And Simon Peter answering said, *Thou* art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
Just before the cross comes into view, Jesus takes His disciples aside and asks who people say He is. The answers vary. Then one man answers for them all, and everything after that turns on his reply.
The disciples report only guesses. One writer says the Lord asked because human uncertainty draws out the faith of His own.
There was the usual answer of men, the uncertainty of human opinion. "He said to them, But who do you say that I am?" He asked because the very uncertainty of men brings out the faith of God's elect. So there is no time at all that God does not turn for good to the believer.
Peter's first title, "the Christ," names Jesus as Israel's promised King. Yet in the same chapter He tells the disciples to stop announcing it. The whole direction of His ministry changes.
The public preaching of the kingdom to the Jews was now to stop. He no longer offered Himself to the nation as their Messiah or Christ. Instead He told His disciples to tell no one that He was the Christ. Instead of pointing to national acceptance and an earthly crown, He speaks of national rejection and an earthly cross. Instead of the old hope of the prophetic kingdom, He mentions a new thing which He was about to establish: the assembly or Church. He had set aside the name Messiah, which linked Him with the throne of David. In its place, for the Church, He takes up a title just made known and infinitely higher: the "Son of the living God."
Peter does not stop at "Son of God." He says "the living God," and one writer shows how much rests on that one word.
He owns Him to be the Son of the One in whom is life and life-giving power. The life of God cannot be destroyed, and the Son of the living God cannot be overcome. In Him is that power of life which nothing can defeat. Satan had the power of death; the Son of God has the power of life. The unchangeable power of life, even though He goes into death, cannot be overcome by death. It is the very reverse. He annuls death. Every other man was overcome by death; the Son of the living God could not be. It is worth noticing the force of "living" here, because He goes on to speak of death, and of "the gates of hell," which mean Satan's kingdom. The Assembly is founded on the unchanging power of life in the Son of God. So the kingdom of death cannot touch it.
That power was not merely claimed; it was demonstrated when the tomb could not hold Him.
The resurrection of the Son of God, according to the power of life which was in Him, is the foundation and measure of the life and security of the church, and it was sheltered, and the church by it, from all the attacks of him who had the power of death. In vain the tomb wrapped itself in darkness — out of the middle of it came life more powerful than ever.
The Lord does not trace this confession to Peter's own thinking. He points to another source, and the Father still opens hearts the same way today.
"Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah," said the Lord, "for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven." We all come to this same blessedness if we know our Lord as "the Christ, the Son of the living God." It is the Father's work to reveal Him to us this way. How wonderful it is! We have not only tasted that the Lord is gracious, equal to all our deep need. The Father in His grace has also opened our hearts to a new position, a new calling, a new place of favour, by revealing to us who His Son is.
Mark and Luke record only the first half of Peter's answer — and in neither place does the Lord speak of building. That difference is not accidental.
If He had been only the Christ, the Messiah of Israel, that would not have been a firm enough basis for the Church. His Messianic dignity might have been rock enough for Israel, since it was their faith and hope. Psalm 2 also speaks of Him in that dignity as Son of God. But "the Son of the living God" was a revelation of His glory that went far beyond it. Once you know and confess the Lord in this His highest glory, He begins for the first time to announce His building of His Church.
Commentators differ on how to name the rock. Some point to the confession, others to the Person confessed in it.
That confession was the rock on which Christ would build His Church — not poor Peter, who so soon denied his Lord and Master. Peter was a stone — a living stone — built into the rock, but the foundation is the confession of Christ Himself.
- Question — Human opinion about Jesus ran out in uncertainty. The Lord's question brought out the faith of His own.
- Gift — Peter did not work this out. The Father revealed it, and the same blessedness belongs to everyone who knows Him this way.
- Word — "Living" is the key word. He is Son of the One in whom is life and life-giving power, and He annuls death.
- Reach — The Lord lays "the Christ" aside as a public title. The higher name takes its place, and He announces a new thing: the Church.
- Result — The Church rests on that unchanging power of life. The kingdom of death cannot touch it; the gates of hell will not prevail.
And Jesus answering said to him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona, for flesh and blood has not revealed [it] to thee, but my Father who is in the heavens.
Peter has just confessed who Jesus is, and Jesus points straight to the source of that confession. The verse shows how anyone comes to know who Jesus is.
Jesus calls Peter blessed. But the confession behind that blessing was not Peter's own achievement:
Jesus Himself declares that the soul who knows Him as the Son of the living God is blessed of the Father. No doubt Peter had learned much from the Lord, as he had followed that lovely and blessed life of devotion and self-sacrifice. But the Father took hold of that uneducated, unlettered Galilean fisherman and taught him the truth. The blessed Man he was following was the Son of the living God. The Father Himself alone can teach you this blessed truth, my friend. No university course and no human teaching can give your soul this knowledge of the Son. But the Father loves to teach the willing soul that seeks Christ.
So what does "flesh and blood" mean here?
Here "flesh and blood" means everything that belongs to man as he now is. It means man in his present condition: a poor, weak, miserable creature... So here the Lord says, "Flesh and blood has not revealed this to you ... but My Father who is in heaven." You have no power to discover this by man's wisdom.
This settles what argument can and cannot do:
So we have no hope of convincing the natural man that the Son is God. Argument will not do it, and no proof of any kind will do it, apart from the work of the Holy Spirit. Jesus said to an apostle, "flesh and blood has not revealed this to you." And we are also told that the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God.
Jesus does not say God, or the Almighty, but My Father. That choice of name is itself part of the gift:
We have tasted that the Lord is gracious and equal to all our deep need. But the Father in His grace has done more. By revealing to us who His Son is, He has opened our hearts to a new position, a new calling, a new place of favour. The revelation is from heaven, and God has made it not as the Almighty or as Jehovah, but as Father, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The Lord calls him Simon, son of Jonah, not Peter. Commentators see a deliberate contrast:
Was not this to emphasise his lowly position as a man? Apart from divine grace, was he not merely Simon, son of Jonah?... Here, at Caesarea Philippi, the contrast is between two things. On one side is what man is by nature, weak at the core. On the other is the high privilege given to the apostle: to declare the divine glory of his Master more fully than ever before. So we see there is a very pointed contrast between Simon Bar-jona and Peter.
What Peter confessed reached past the title Israel was waiting for:
A confession so remarkably rich drew out the Saviour's recognition of His Father's grace to Simon Barjona... He was the Son of the living God. If He had been only the Christ, the Messiah of Israel, that would not have been a strong enough basis for the Church. His dignity as Messiah might have been rock enough for Israel, since it was their faith and hope. But "the Son of the living God" was a revelation of His glory that went far beyond it.
Receiving a revelation and living up to it are two different things:
Though he had just made the blessed confession of Christ which the Father had revealed to him... when the Lord spoke of His path of humiliation, as Son of Man, Peter could not bear it... Peter's flesh was not broken down enough to walk in the power of the truth he had received and rejoiced in. So it is with us.
- Source — Peter did not reach this himself. The Father in heaven revealed it, and so Jesus calls him blessed.
- Limit — "flesh and blood" is man as he now is, and no amount of human wisdom or argument reaches this truth.
- Name — God gives it as Father, not as Almighty, so the revelation brings a new place of favour along with it.
- Contrast — Jesus names him Simon, son of Jonah — the weak man by nature — and hands him this high privilege.
- Foundation — the Father showed more than "Messiah." He showed the "Son of the living God," the one basis of the Church.
And *I* also, I say unto thee that *thou* art Peter, and on this rock I will build my assembly, and hades' gates shall not prevail against it.
Peter has just confessed that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. The Lord answers by announcing something new: He will build a church of His own. Two questions have divided readers ever since. What is the rock? And what is this church He promises to build?
The Lord's words turn on a difference between two Greek words that English hides. One writer sets them side by side:
The Lord now speaks to Peter by the name He had given him. Peter is petros, a stone. The rock He builds on is petra, the great rock foundation. And the gates of hell — the schemes and plots of Hades, the underworld — will not prevail against it.
So the new name is a gift of grace tied to what Peter had just said, while the foundation itself is the truth he confessed:
By grace Peter had confessed what no one ever had: that Christ was the Son of the living God. The Lord acknowledges the grace given to him. He gives him the name Peter, a stone. So by grace, through his confession, Peter shares in the very thing he confessed. For it was on that truth — that Christ is the Son of the living God — that He would build His church.
The tense of the verb matters. The Lord had not built anything yet:
Notice the expression. It is not, I have been building; but I will build My Church. He had not built it yet, nor begun to build it: it was altogether new. I do not mean that no one believed in Him before, or was born again of the Spirit. But it is a mistake to call all believers from the beginning to the end of time "the Church."
If the building had not started, something first had to happen:
When the Lord spoke, He had not begun to build. "I will build" is future. That building could not begin until Christ had finished the work of redemption, until He had risen and gone up into heaven, and until the Holy Spirit had come.
The Lord calls this building His own. That ownership decides what it will be like:
Here we see what the church is for Christ. He says, "I will build my church." Many other Scriptures speak of the church as belonging to God. But here the Son of God speaks of it as His own, as something He Himself is building… Men can spoil, break and ruin what they build. What Christ is building stays perfect, and nothing can break into it.
Commentators read "the gates of hell" as the power of death, and they tie the promise back to the confession it rests on:
So the gates of hades — the power of death, held by Satan — will not prevail against the church. For the resurrection declared Christ to be Son of God with power, above all the power of Satan. The church is built on this rock, on His being the Son of the living God. So Satan's power, the power of death, could not overthrow it.
The exact word the Lord uses matters:
Note, it is His church, and He is still building. No wonder then that the gates even of Hades shall not prevail against it. They shall not "prevail." The Lord does not say that His church will escape heavy and painful blows. He says the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. This should comfort us; for His church must stand.
Knowing the doctrine is not the end of it. One writer presses the verse home:
So it is not enough to say, "I have Christ," however blessed that is. If I know that He is the Son of God, I must also believe that He is now building the church. Do I know my place in His church? Am I walking in the life of Christ, a living stone in my proper place in the house He is building?"
- Confession — Peter names who Jesus is first. Only then does the Lord announce the building.
- Foundation — Grace gives Peter a name meaning "stone." But the rock underneath is the truth he confessed: Christ, the Son of God.
- Future — "I will build" is future. The work waited for redemption, resurrection, ascension, and the coming of the Spirit.
- Ownership — He calls it "My church." Men can ruin what they build. Nothing can break what Christ builds.
- Outcome — Death and Satan may strike heavy blows. They cannot prevail, because the risen Son of God is the foundation.
And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of the heavens; and whatsoever thou mayest bind upon the earth shall be bound in the heavens; and whatsoever thou mayest loose on the earth shall be loosed in the heavens.
Peter has just confessed Jesus as "the Christ, the Son of the living God." The Lord answers with a promise to build, and then a promise of keys. What are these keys? Who holds them? How far does the power to bind and loose reach?
The Lord does not hand over heaven's gate. He does not hand over the church He has just promised to build.
Did Christ give Peter the keys of heaven? Impossible. Men have painted pictures of the Lord and His apostles, and Peter with keys hanging at his belt, while a flock of sheep surrounds them. So many people think Peter has the keys of the Church. There are none such. This is a pure fallacy. Sheep are not fed by keys, and Christ does not build with keys. The value of keys is to open doors, and once the doors are opened the keys are of no more use.
One writer names what the Lord never said, and what He never meant:
People have badly misapplied these words, and have built the most terrible doctrines on them... The Lord did not say that He gave him the keys of heaven. And with the loosing on earth and loosing in heaven, the Lord never meant that the eternal destiny of one single soul was left in Peter's hands.
If the keys belong to the kingdom of heaven, everything depends on what that phrase means — and it is not a synonym for heaven or for the church.
There is no deeper mistake than confusing "the kingdom of heaven" with "heaven." The kingdom of heaven is the rule of heaven over the earth... We must not confuse the kingdom of heaven with Christ's church. The kingdom of heaven is what He governs... it is the scene of profession, and so there may be all sorts of things there that are far from Christ; weeds as well as wheat.
One writer links these keys to an Old Testament picture — the steward who runs the royal house:
"I will place on his shoulder the key of the house of David"... A housekeeper, or steward, has the keys, and administers the household affairs as a trust. Peter did so in the kingdom and with full authority.
Keys open doors, and Peter opened two — one for Jews, one for Gentiles, who were not Jews:
God chose Peter to preach the first sermon after the Holy Spirit came down from heaven. Three thousand people were brought to repentance, and were baptised at once in the Saviour's name. But these were Jews only. In Acts 10 the same apostle proclaims Christ for the first time to a Gentile gathering. Everyone in Cornelius' house believed, and they received Christian baptism straight away.
Binding and loosing also show up in the record. One writer sees Peter's welcome of both Jews and Gentiles as "loosing," and his rebuke of Simon the sorcerer as "binding." Simon was baptised as a professed subject of the kingdom, yet he "had never been built by the Lord into His church" (F. B. Hole).
The verse says "on earth" twice, and that limit is deliberate.
The promise limits itself to earth as the sphere of this binding or loosing... The earth is the only place where the binding applies. Heaven is the seat of authority for the kingdom, so "shall be bound in heaven" simply means that heaven would confirm the act of its representatives on earth. There is power on earth, and for earth, only. Yet whoever rebels against it rebels against the authority of heaven.
Heaven does not approve just anything, either. One writer warns that these words are "not unconditional and absolute." He adds that "the throne of heaven can only approve what is righteous and according to God's Word and of His Spirit" (Raymond K. Campbell).
One writer is blunt about succession, and points to where the same words appear again:
Does this authority given to the apostle pass on to successors? There is no hint of such a thing in Matthew 16:19. The Saviour's words give nothing beyond a personal commission. But in Matthew 18:18 the very same words appear in a completely different setting. Peter is not in view there, but the assembly of God's people, gathered in any place on earth and at any time... To receive into fellowship from the world outside is to "loose"; to put away a wrongdoer is to "bind"; to welcome the repentant one back again is to "loose" again.
- Keys — of the kingdom of heaven: not of heaven, and not of the church. Christ builds; keys open doors.
- Kingdom — heaven's rule over the earth: the scene of profession, holding weeds along with wheat.
- Stewardship — a key is a steward's badge. Peter administered the kingdom as a trust; nothing beyond his personal commission passes on.
- Use — Peter turned the key at Pentecost for Jews, and at Cornelius' house for Gentiles. He bound and loosed in the discipline recorded in Acts.
- Limit — the binding is on earth. Heaven confirms what its representatives do there, and can only approve what agrees with God's Word.