Matthew 13:1–23

Matthew 13:1 · Darby

And that [same] day Jesus went out from the house and sat down by the sea.

Matthew 13 opens with an action, not a sermon. Commentators read that small move — out of the house, down to the sea — as a hinge in the book: the King steps away from Israel to a wider field and a new kind of work.

The Same Day

The phrase "that same day" ties this scene to what has just happened. At the end of chapter 12, someone mentioned His mother and brothers to Him. His answer redrew the lines of family.

At the close of the previous chapter our Lord disowned all the natural ties which bound Him to Israel. I am speaking only of His bringing it out as teaching. In terms of history, the moment of the final break with them was the cross. But in terms of His ministry, if we may say so, the break happened, and He signalled it now. He took advantage of a reference to His mother and brothers to say who His real kindred were. They were no longer those connected with Him after the flesh. The only family He could own now were those who did the will of His Father in heaven. He recognises nothing but the tie formed by the word of God received into the heart and obeyed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Out of the House

Both halves of the verse carry a meaning beyond the geography.

Up to this time the house of God was connected with Israel. There God dwelt, as far as this could be said of the earth; He counted it as His habitation. But Jesus went out of the house, and sat by the seaside. We all know what the sea stands for in the symbolic language of the Old and New Testaments. It represents masses of men, roving here and there outside, not under the settled government of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sitting by the Sea

Another writer points to a Scripture that names the symbol outright.

He leaves the house, to sit by the seaside. Let anyone compare the picture of the woman who "is seated on many waters" in Revelation 17:1, and he will find the meaning of this. The angel interprets it for us in that chapter: "The waters that you saw, where the prostitute is seated, are peoples and multitudes and nations and languages." So here the Lord leaves the house, the place of recognised natural relationship. He takes His place, as it were, in the highway of the world's trade, which is what the sea is.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

He also puts distance between Himself and the crowd He teaches.

He separated Himself from the multitude. While in the first part of this Gospel He moves among the crowds, here He takes His place alone. There on the seashore stands the crowd, and He is alone, some way out — no one can reach Him by touch now.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

A New Work: Sowing, Not Reaping

The first words He speaks are about a sower.

He leaves the house, goes to the seaside, no longer seeking fruit in His vineyard, which bore none but bad — sowing that from which fruit was to come. The kingdom of heaven in its mystery, with an absent king, takes the place of Messiah upon earth.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer sets this new work against the law.

The seven parables unfolded there bring in the idea of an entirely new departure and manner of activity on God's part. The law addressed itself to man as though God had until then been seeking to get something from man. He got nothing. Now that day was over, and a new kind of ministry was coming. God was going to put something into man, instead of trying to get something out of him — that was the principle of law: "A sower went out to sow." And "the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven" take the place of the kingdom in open display. That open display is put off to a day of glory still to come.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why Parables Now

The manner of the teaching is itself part of the message. Speaking in stories was not simply a teaching aid.

And now the Lord begins to speak in parables. This is deeply significant of the moment, because this way of speaking was one kind of judgment upon Israel... The Lord tells us Himself that He was now speaking in parables to fulfil the word of the prophet: "You will indeed hear but never understand, and you will indeed see but never perceive." Each parable had its own secret; but it was not given to Israel to know it. The Lord had a people whom these parables would instruct — instruct in mysteries, mysteries of the kingdom; but they left Israel in darkness.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Rejection — "That same day" links back to chapter 12. Jesus had just disowned His natural ties with Israel and called those who do His Father's will His family.

- Departure — The house He leaves pictures Israel, where God had counted His dwelling on earth.

- Reach — The sea stands for peoples and nations. He sits beside it, and the testimony widens far past Israel.

- Method — He stops looking for fruit in a vineyard that gave none, and starts sowing. God now puts something into man instead of asking something from him.

- Mystery — The parables open the kingdom's secrets to His disciples and leave unbelieving Israel in darkness. Its open display waits for a day of glory still to come.

Matthew 13:2 · Darby

And great crowds were gathered together to him, so that going on board ship himself he sat down, and the whole crowd stood on the shore.

Why does the Lord leave the house, sit by the sea, and teach a crowd from a boat? Commentators read each move as deliberate: the scene marks a turning point in God's dealings, and it sets the stage for the seven parables that follow.

Out of the house

Writers see in the house the place God had made His dwelling, and in His leaving it a break with the nation.

Up to this time the house of God was connected with Israel. There God dwelt, as far as this could be said of the earth; He counted it as His habitation. But Jesus went out of the house and sat beside the sea... The very action of our Lord showed that a very widespread testimony was coming... The Holy Spirit here gives us seven connected parables, all brought together into one consistent system, to give a complete account of the new order of things about to begin — Christianity and the Christian world, the true as well as the false.

after-note: DISCUSS not needed

William Kelly

The sea and the wider field

The sea carries a meaning drawn from elsewhere in Scripture. It shows where the message is now heading.

Israel is seen as set aside because of unbelief. The Lord went out of the house — a picture of Israel's house — and sat by the seaside. The sea pictures the Gentile nations (Rev. 17:15). So in Chapter 13 we can expect the teaching of a new era: the gospel going out to all the world. Because of great crowds gathered to hear Him, He preaches from a boat to His audience on the shore of the lake.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Into the boat

The crowds gather, and therefore He gets into the boat. The crowd does not draw Him in; it moves Him further out.

So He leaves the house, the sphere of natural family ties, and takes His place by the sea. The sea is the picture of man in the restlessness and barrenness of nature — man apart from God, and so the Gentiles. The gathering crowd does not hold Him back; it hurries His departure. He gets into a boat and sits down there — taking His place apart from them for good.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Earlier in this Gospel He moved among the crowds, within reach of their touch. Now the water lies between.

He separated Himself from the crowd. In the first part of this Gospel He moves among the crowds; here He takes His place alone. What a scene it must have been! There on the seashore the multitude, and He alone some way off from the shore — No one can reach Him by touch now. All is significant. Then, when all eyes hung upon His lips, He began to speak.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why He now speaks in parables

The change of place goes with a change of style. From the boat He begins to teach in a way that hides as much as it reveals.

And now, in the same way, the Lord begins to speak in parables. This is full of meaning for that moment, because this way of speaking was one form of judgment upon Israel... They had their own secret, each of them; but it was not given to Israel to know it. The Lord had a people whom the parables would teach — teach them mysteries, the mysteries of the kingdom. But the parables left Israel in darkness.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The chapter keeps that line between shore and house, and what He teaches in each place differs.

On the shore of the lake of Galilee the Lord spoke four parables where the crowd could hear: the sower, the weeds, the mustard tree, and the leaven. Inside the house, alone with His disciples, He explained the parable of the weeds... In parables to the crowd the Lord gave the outward character of the kingdom of the heavens, as men would see it. Its aspect from God's point of view He kept for the special instruction of His disciples.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Sowing, not seeking fruit

From the boat He takes up a new role, and it defines the work now beginning.

He leaves the house. That is a sign, I do not doubt, of the immense change in the ways of God. He sits in a boat on the sea and presents Himself as a sower — that is, He no longer seeks fruit, but carries with Him into this world what was to produce it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Out — God had counted that house His dwelling on earth. The Lord leaves it, and Israel's place is set aside.

- Outward — sitting by the sea points to the nations. From here on the testimony reaches far wider than before.

- Off shore — the growing crowd does not hold Him back. It speeds Him into the boat, where He sits apart and out of reach.

- Obscured — from there He speaks in parables. They teach the mysteries of the kingdom to His own people and leave Israel in the dark.

- Onward — He no longer looks for fruit in an old field. He goes out as a sower, carrying what alone can produce fruit.

Matthew 13:3 · Darby

And he spoke to them many things in parables, saying, Behold, the sower went out to sow

Jesus sits by the sea and teaches in parables for the first time, beginning with a man scattering seed. The whole chapter rests on this picture: who sows, what the seed is, and why one seed gives such different results.

after_note: DELETE

Why Parables Now

The disciples noticed the change of method and asked about it. His answer tied the parables to His own rejection.

This is the first time the word parable occurs in the New Testament. The disciples, struck by this method of teaching, asked the Lord: "Why do you speak to them in parables?" (v. 10). The Lord's answer is telling. It confirms that the teaching of the parables of the kingdom of heaven relates to the rejection of the king… This is solemn indeed. They could not see because they had refused to see.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Who the Sower Is

The Lord's own explanation of the next parable tells us who the sower is. (Some older translations read "the sower" here, where the ESV has "a sower".)

The identity of the sower is not difficult to clear up. In explaining the second parable our Lord says: "He who sows the good seed is the Son of Man." Our Lord Himself is the Sower. He came with the precious seed, the fine wheat, and of course He Himself is the grain of wheat. The seed He sows can only bear fruit as it falls on good ground. In the ground it dies, and out of death comes the fruit… We would take this parable in the first sense to apply to the days of our Lord on the earth. In a wider sense we must take it as a picture of the whole age, while He is absent from the earth and the Kingdom is in the hands of men. The sowing He began continues still, and the result of sowing is likewise the same.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Going Out to Sow: A New Departure

A sower does not come to collect a harvest. He comes to put seed in. That reverses what God had been doing with people until now.

The Saviour likened Himself to a sower of seed (Matt. 13:3–8). This marks a new departure in the ways of God with man. In the earlier ages of the world's history God had been looking for fruit from man, above all from Israel. He had every right to do so. But He sought it in vain, because flesh is evil beyond cure… God no longer looks for fruit from man. His present action is to sow the good seed of the gospel, and so produce His own fruit. This work has been proceeding ever since the Son of God came to earth.

Modernised from William Wooldridge FeredayOriginal wording

The Seed

Matthew and Luke name the seed differently, and each name teaches something.

Mark calls the seed simply the word, with no qualification. In Luke we read something more exact: "The seed is the word of God." This phrase states the divine origin of the word… But in Matthew we have not the general term but the specific one. The seed is there described as the "word of the kingdom." This phrase covered the subject of the word, while that of Luke looked to its Author.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One seed, four outcomes: the difference cannot lie in the seed. That changes how we judge apparent failure in preaching.

The seed was pure; it was the word of God. There could be no doubt about its power to grow… So wherever it fell, the only hindrance to a full crop would be the condition of the ground — in other words, the heart of the person it might come to. Men might think of blaming the Word for the apparent failure of the work. Against such thoughts the Lord would warn us… All who preach or teach may make sure that it is the word of God they are using. They can count on it being enough, as the Holy Spirit applies it, to do a divine work in the hearts and consciences of men.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Where This Parable Stands in the Chapter

This parable comes first for a reason. One soil in four bears fruit, and that number shapes what a reader should expect as the message spreads.

The first parable is not a representation of the kingdom, but of the work by which the kingdom is formed. All the other parables in the chapter rest on it… The seed falls on four kinds of ground, and in only one does it bring forth fruit… How empty is the hope that preaching the gospel everywhere would bring blessing everywhere! … Gentiles as well as Jews were to hear the word of the kingdom.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Summary

- Sower. The Son of Man Himself goes out with the seed. The sowing He began still goes on through the whole age of His absence.

- Seed. It is the word of the kingdom. Matthew names its subject, Luke names its Author, and the seed carries its own power to grow.

- Soil. Since the seed is uniform and pure, every failure traces back to the ground, not to the message.

- Speech. Parables opened the kingdom's secrets to the disciples. They left in the dark those who had refused to see.

- Sequel. This first parable is the foundation of the chapter. It shows the work that forms the kingdom, and it warns us not to expect fruit everywhere the message is preached.

Matthew 13:4 · Darby

and as he sowed, some [grains] fell along the way, and the birds came and devoured them;

The parable opens with a sower, and his first seed lands on a packed footpath where nothing can sink in. Two questions follow: why does good seed produce nothing here, and who are the birds that carry it off?

A new work begins

Commentators point out that the picture of a sower marks a change in how God is dealing with people. Before this, He had come looking for fruit that was already there. Now He comes sowing into a world where there was nothing.

The very fact that Christ came as the sower proved that Israel was set aside. If He had still been coming to Israel as His vineyard, He would have come looking for fruit from the vine He planted long ago. He had already come to Israel, looking for fruit and finding none. Now He comes in the new character of the sower, which is a completely different thing. He comes into an empty world, where there was nothing, and He starts a fresh work.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Nothing wrong with the seed

When seed comes to nothing, suspicion falls on the sower or on the seed. This first case clears both.

Here the sowing produces nothing at all. The seed falls on a hard, closed heart. It does not even sprout. Man's spiritual enemy carries it off at once. None of the blame for this failure belongs to the Sower or to the seed. Both are perfect, without a fault of any kind. But the ground was hard and beaten down, never ploughed, and the birds of the air were watching to steal the good seed.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What makes a path a path

A footpath is hard because of everything that has walked over it. Writers apply that to the traffic of an ordinary life.

It is a solemn thing to read even of a man like this that the word was "sown in his heart" (v. 19). That does not mean he was converted. He does not even "understand." But why? Because, like the path, the ground it is sown on is trodden too hard for the seed to sink in. The seed lies out in the open in front of the birds of heaven, almost inviting the tempter to "catch it away." There are many souls like this. They are taken up with things that harden them and deaden them to everything else — business or pleasure, lawful or lawless.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The hearing may be real. It just stops short of the conscience.

The "wayside" hearers are those who hear, but the word never reaches their conscience. It is like seed that falls on the hard road and never sinks below the surface. The birds of the air can eat such seed without trouble. Satan can take away what held only passing interest for the mind and never touched the conscience.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The birds

Christ Himself says what the birds stand for, and the same birds reappear later in the chapter.

Birds are used as symbols of evil agents. In the dream of Pharaoh's baker, the birds ate the baked goods he was carrying on his head (Gen. 40:17). In the parable of the Sower, Christ explains that the birds which ate the seed by the path stand for "the wicked one" (Matt. 13:4, 19). In the parable of the Mustard Seed, the kingdom of heaven becomes a great system with roots in the earth, and the birds of the air shelter under it (Matt. 13:31-32). The Greek word is the same in both parables: πετεινόν.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The picture also shows how quickly the enemy works.

Birds you never saw a moment before appear and carry off crumbs thrown on the ground. In the same way the enemy takes away the seed that was sown, because the hearer did not care for it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Still fully responsible

The Lord's explanation says this hearer "does not understand" (v. 19). One writer argues that this is not about brainpower.

But is this a question of mental capacity, of intellectual understanding? Not at all. The Lord says the word was "sown in the heart." It aimed itself at the conscience, and the hearer could accept it or reject it. But the heart would not have it and turned against it. "And does not understand it" means "he would not understand or receive it."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

So the enemy's activity never cancels the hearer's accountability.

The man who heard it is no less guilty. What was sown in his heart fitted every need — man's nature and man's condition.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sower. Christ did not come to collect fruit from ground already planted. He came to start fresh, sowing the word into a world that had none.

- Seed. The same perfect seed falls everywhere. Where nothing grows, the fault is not in the sower or the seed.

- Soil. The path is trodden hard, so the word stays on the surface. The mind hears it; the conscience never does.

- Snatcher. The birds are the wicked one. He appears out of nowhere and carries off what the hearer left uncared for.

- Solemn. "Does not understand" means "would not receive." The enemy takes only what the heart has already refused, so the hearer stays guilty.

Matthew 13:5 · Darby

and others fell upon the rocky places where they had not much earth, and immediately they sprang up out of [the ground] because of not having [any] depth of earth,

This second ground in the parable looks at first like a success: the seed grows, and it grows fast. The verse raises the question of why fast growth proves nothing, and what is missing under the surface.

Rock under a skin of soil

The ground here is not soil littered with stones. Commentators describe solid rock lying just under a thin layer of earth.

It is rocky ground, not stony: bedrock, with a slight layer of earth over it. In it the seed grows fast, but only at the surface. That is the very thing that destroys it a little while later. At first the rock works like a hot-house: "immediately they sprang up, since they had no depth of soil." Then the sun grew hotter and scorched it. And because it had no root, it withered away.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Speed as a warning sign

The phrase "immediately they sprang up" is not praise. A mind can take in a great deal while the heart never faces its own state.

There was a more hopeful appearance in this case. The word was received, but the ground was rocky; there was no depth of earth. Appearances came very quickly — "immediately they sprang up." There is little or no sense of sin. Everything is taken in far too readily. "The plan of salvation" may be thought excellent. There may be no denying that his mind has been enlightened. But such a person has never measured his awful condition in God's sight. The good word of God is tasted, but the ground is rocky. Conscience has not been properly exercised. Whereas, in a real work of heart, conscience is the soil in which the word of God takes effect. There can never be a real work of God without a sense of sin.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The fault lies in the ground itself

The first hearer had an excuse of sorts. This one has none: the problem is what he is, not what happened to him.

Here it is the nature of the ground that is at fault. With the hearer beside the path, you could argue that circumstances made him what he was. The traffic over that ground had packed it hard. Here it was the nature of the ground itself. The prophet — or rather, God through him — speaks of a "heart of stone" (Ezekiel 36:26). Beyond question, that is exactly what is pictured here. Yet there is earth as well, a surface responsiveness which promises a great deal at the start.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Human nature shown at its best

This soil is not a picture of open rejection. It shows human nature at its most welcoming — and still failing.

In the next class of hearers, the stony ground illustrates the opposition of the flesh. And for this purpose it is pictured, not at its worst, but at its best... Here is not the natural man's rejection of the Word, but his reception of it. Yet there is no more real fruit than in the first case.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Joy that arrives too early

This hearer welcomes the word with joy. Writers treat that instant gladness as evidence against the work, not for it.

Some also received the word with joy. This was proof that the conscience was untouched. When the conscience is reached, the result is anything but joy — until forgiveness is known. The feelings may be stirred for a time, and the word listened to with a joy that will give way to sorrow. The reason truth is taken up so lightly with joy is that there is no root, and so it is received in joy and given up in trouble.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The sun that finds out the root

Heat is what exposes rootless growth. Here is what the burning sun stands for.

Everything is fine with those who receive the word with joy but have no root, while they live at ease in the world. They produce fruit as fair and promising as any seen in the church. But then comes worldly loss and persecution for confessing Christ. When trials and afflictions and the cross meet them on their way, they stumble. These are the scorching sun that withers the seed and all its fruit.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the ground needs first

If shallowness is the problem, the plough is the answer.

The importance of this process in the soul cannot be overestimated. The lack of it is the secret of so much of the shallow profession all around us. The seed gets no deep root in unbroken ground. The deeper the furrow made by the ploughshare of conviction, the deeper the root, and the more abundant the fruit in later days.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Rock — the trouble is bedrock under a thin layer of soil. The fault is in the ground itself, not in anything that happened to it.

- Rush — fast growth is a symptom, not a success. The same shallowness that speeds it up guarantees the collapse.

- Rejoicing — joy before any sense of sin stirs the feelings but never reaches the conscience.

- Roasting — trouble and persecution are the sun. Heat does not create the weakness. It only shows there was never any root.

- Root — the deeper the furrow of conviction, the deeper the root and the fuller the fruit. Ploughing must come before sowing.

Matthew 13:6 · Darby

but when the sun rose they were burned up, and because of not having [any] root were dried up;

Matthew 13:6 is the second half of a two-verse picture: seed that fell on rocky ground, came up fast, and then met the sun. It raises a question every hearer has to face: why did a plant that started so well die so fast?

The rock under the thin soil

The ground here is not soil littered with stones. Commentators describe a shelf of rock just under a thin skin of earth. That explains both the fast start and the quick death.

It is rocky ground, not stony: bed-rock with a slight layer of earth over it. In that thin soil the seed grows fast, but only near the surface. The very thing that destroyed it a little later was what first produced this hot-house growth: "immediately they sprang up, since they had no depth of soil." Later the sun grew hotter and scorched it. Because it had no root, it withered away.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the seed never rooted

So why was there no root? One writer points to the conscience.

In the next case the word is received at once with joy. That tends to prove the heart will not keep it, for the conscience was hardly reached. A conscience touched by the word makes a man serious. He sees himself in the presence of God, and that is always a serious thing, however much His grace attracts him or His goodness gives him hope. If the word has not reached the conscience, there is no root. He received the word for the joy it gave; when it brings trouble, he gives it up.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the sun stands for

The sun is not bad weather. It stands for the trouble that comes to a person because he has taken up the word.

All is well with those who receive the word with joy but have no root, while they live at ease in the world. They produce fruit as fair and promising as any seen in the church. But then loss in the world and persecution come on them for confessing Christ. When trials and afflictions and the cross meet them on their way, they are offended. These are the scorching sun that withers the seed and all its fruit.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same heat would have done a healthy plant good. Sun drives roots downward — unless there is nowhere for them to go.

Normally the sun's rays would have driven the seed to root deeper and firmer, as the root struck downwards in search of moisture. Here the heat withered it instead, and hurried the growth to its total destruction.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Green above, dry below

The trouble was underground, not in the green leaf above.

In this case the seed sprang quickly into life and showed very rapid growth. But the burning sun beat down on these lush young plants. They were so scorched that they withered and died. There was a great deal of green stalk and leaf on display, but no matching root development. So at the crucial moment, when they needed it most, they "lacked moisture" (Luke 8:6), and they withered away. They had no underground connection with springs or streams of water, such as the tree of the first Psalm had.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Withering as the test of what was real

The plant died, and its death showed what it always was. What lasts marks out God's work from man's.

So there is no root in the man himself; Christ is not his real and great necessity. Therefore, "when tribulation or persecution arises on account of the word, immediately he falls away." This is the religion of the flesh, of sentiment, of unreality. This is its end. It lacks the sign and seal of a work that is truly divine — permanence. It "lasts for a while." "I perceive that whatever God does endures forever" (Ecclesiastes 3:14).

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The warning for hearers today

One writer links three phrases from the parable into a chain.

Notice the words, "immediately receives it with joy." There is no deep work of conscience, no moral judgment of self or of sin. As a result there is no depth of root, no power of endurance… We should ponder with the greatest care how these expressions hang together: "immediately, with joy," "no root," "withered away." A person may take in the plan of salvation with the mind only, with no spiritual work in the conscience. That is a great danger. Such a reception often comes with the most joyful emotions. It stirs the natural feelings, but the truth has not entered the heart. The Word has cut no furrow.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Rock — A shelf of bed-rock under a thin skin of soil is the whole problem. What made the seed shoot up fast is what killed it.

- No furrow — Feeling took the word in, but the Word never cut into the conscience. God makes a person serious before He makes him glad.

- No root — There was nothing for roots to go into, so the plant had no hidden supply — unlike the tree planted by streams of water.

- Sun — Heat that should have driven roots deeper scorched the plant instead. The sun stands for trouble and persecution that come because of the word.

- Withered — Permanence is the seal of God's work; what lasts only "for a while" was never more than religion of the flesh.

Matthew 13:7 · Darby

and others fell upon the thorns, and the thorns grew up and choked them;

This is the third ground in the parable of the sower, and it looks the most ordinary. Nothing attacks the seed here. It shares its ground with something already growing, and loses.

Ground Already Occupied

The trouble starts before the sowing. The thorns own the ground first, and Matthew keeps the spotlight on them.

Here the ground is already occupied with something else, and something that is native to the soil as well. The thorns were there before the seed fell among them. So much so that Matthew takes no account of the seed's apparent growth at all — only of the thorns. Luke mentions that growth only to show that the flourishing thorns choked the seed.

Modernised from Messiah the PrinceOriginal wording

What was already there stays hidden until the word arrives and forces it into the open.

In the thorny ground hearers, the roots of thorns already filled the ground before the good seed fell into their hearts. Those roots are the desires for the things of this life, for riches and pleasures. They sprang up and choked the word. Although the roots were already in the heart, they did not spring up until the good seed was sown there. The heart may not show how firmly present things grip it. No one may even realise it, until the word of God comes and tests it.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What the Thorns Are

The Lord Himself explains what the thorns stand for, and Mark and Luke list them.

"Other seeds fell among thorns." There you have the world. The Lord says, "the cares of this age" — that is the first thing mentioned. Then "the deceitfulness of riches, and the desires for other things," or "pleasures of life." Those are the three things mentioned in Mark and Luke.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Poor and Rich Alike

Being poor is no safer than being rich. Each also carries the other's danger.

Poverty and riches, as Agur long ago noted (Prov. 30:8-9), are seen here as alike unfavourable to spiritual life. Yet riches may entice the poor, and care may weigh heavily upon the prosperous rich man. The deceitfulness of riches is so great a snare that the Lord said elsewhere a rich man can hardly enter the kingdom of heaven (Matt. 19:23). But He was careful to keep this from meaning that salvation itself differs for different classes of people. Everyone who realises his need of salvation belongs to one class only: "Christ died for sinners" covers every case.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Nearness, Not Hostility

The second soil failed under open attack. This one fails to something that never looks like an enemy at all.

The influence of present things on eternal things is not openly hostile, as affliction and persecution were in the previous class. But it is just as deadly, and far more dangerous, because it works so quietly. The thorns were growing too near the seed. A mile away it would not have mattered. Because they were close, they could secretly and effectively rob the good seed of the light, air, moisture and nourishment it needed from the soil.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

No Fruit at All

A crowded heart may still say yes to the message. What it cannot do is produce anything.

The Lord shows here how utterly impossible it is to produce fruit for God while the heart is occupied with the world. In Luke the whole range of worldly influences is shown — its cares, its riches, its pleasures. The three combined, or any one of them, may so fill the heart that the word of God does nothing in it. It falls on the ear. The mind may even quietly agree with it. Yet it produces no saving faith in the soul and no fruit in the life, because there is no purpose of heart for God and no break with the world.

Modernised from Messiah the PrinceOriginal wording

Clearing the Ground

You do not clear thorny ground by attacking the thorns. You clear it by filling it with something better.

We all know that since the fall the ground produces thorns and briars. People have tried many methods to get rid of them. Experience has taught the farmer that there is only one way to do it. He may plough and harrow, but for every root he breaks, two plants will grow up, and his field will become a briar patch. Let him instead sow the field with grass seed, and as the grass grows up it will drive out the briars. This is overcoming evil with good... Let the positive things of Christ fill the heart. Let the word of Christ dwell in us richly. Then we will have little room and less desire for the lusts of the flesh.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Room. This soil fails over room. The thorns were in the ground first, so the word arrives to find the space taken.

- Exposure. The roots stay hidden until the word is sown. God's word shows how firmly present things grip a heart.

- Named. The thorns are the world in the heart: the cares of this age, the deceitfulness of riches, the desires for other things. They crowd poor and rich alike.

- Nearness. No open attack ruins this soil. The thorns grow close and steal its light, air and nourishment.

- Fruit. Agreeing with the word bears nothing without a break from the world. Do not fight the thorns; let the things of Christ fill the room instead.

Matthew 13:8 · Darby

and others fell upon the good ground, and produced fruit, one a hundred, one sixty, and one thirty.

Here the seed finally lands where it can work, and the parable reaches a harvest. But the yield is not the same in every case. The Lord names three amounts, and commentators have long asked why.

The Sower and His seed

The picture of God sowing rather than harvesting marks a turn in His dealings with people.

The Saviour likened Himself to a sower of seed (Matt. 13:3-8). This marks a new turn in God's ways with man. In earlier ages God had looked to man for fruit, and to Israel above all. He had every right to do so. But He looked in vain, for the flesh is evil beyond cure... God no longer looks for fruit from man. He now sows the good seed of the Gospel, and so produces His own fruit.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Yet only one throw in four comes to anything, and even that one is mixed.

The sower here is the Lord Himself, yet out of four casts of the seed, three are unsuccessful. Only in the last case does the seed bear ripe fruit. Even there the result is mixed and held back — "some a hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty." Natural things still hinder fruitfulness, more or less.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What makes the ground good

The word "good" raises a problem. Scripture elsewhere describes the human heart very differently.

Someone may ask why the hearts of some are compared to good ground, when Scripture teaches that every heart is deceitful and desperately wicked. It is not because there is anything good in them by nature. Only the facts are given here, not the cause behind them. We simply see the preaching of the word and the receiving of it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The first three soils fail through the devil, human nature, and the world. One influence is left to explain the fourth.

We are not told what has made it good. But if we have the devil, nature, and the world in the first three parables, what influence is left? There is nothing but the Holy Spirit. Today we badly need to say that the plough must come before the seed-basket. What makes the heart good? He who has gone out to plough the unbroken ground and sow the seed.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Three measures, one harvest

The three amounts mark real differences among believers. They do not mark a line between saved and lost.

This group alone describes true believers, and all of them bear fruit, though the Lord names three different measures. Thirty-fold is not large, but it is fruit; sixty-fold is more fruit, and one hundred-fold is much fruit (John 15:2-5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same forces that killed the seed earlier appear here in a weaker form.

In the other cases the power of Satan and the attractions of the world kill the growth completely. Here they only reduce the amount of fruit produced.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Where the fruitfulness comes from

The natural heart rejects the word. So the fruit here needs a cause outside the soil.

If all that is in the natural heart hates and rejects the word, why does it bear fruit here? Our Lord Himself tells us at the start of John 15: "I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser." That is why the seed takes root in any heart and produces fruit. God values and loves every branch of the true vine so much that He Himself stoops to be their vinedresser. First He gives them the power by which the seed takes root and grows. Then, when it becomes a branch in Christ, He prunes it so that it may bear more fruit.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The parable does not say why the yields differ.

Does the difference come from faithfulness or from opportunity? The Lord does not take up the question here. But other scriptures show that God will take both into account in the great Day of Rewards.

Modernised from Messiah and PrinceOriginal wording

The order of the numbers

Matthew counts down from a hundred; Mark counts up from thirty. Commentators differ on whether this carries meaning.

Is this difference of order a mere accident? No, it is designed, and there is a divine purpose in it... the order of the words in Matthew points to the decline of the whole company of people who profess faith — yes, even in the fruit-bearing of the good seed. This is not through any defect in the good seed, which is the Word, but through some bad quality in the good ground.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer doubts that the falling order carries that weight.

The suggestion that an age running to its end may account for the falling numbers will hardly fit here... Even so, may our hearts long to prove in full the work of God in our souls.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sower. God no longer looks to man for fruit. He now sows to produce His own fruit, so the harvest starts with Him.

- Soil. No heart is good by nature. The plough comes before the seed-basket, and only the Holy Spirit explains a soil that receives the word.

- Seed. The word takes root only because the Father Himself acts as the vinedresser. He gives the power, then prunes for more fruit.

- Fruit. Only this fourth group are true believers, and every one bears fruit. Thirty-fold is small, but it is still fruit.

- Measure. Satan and the world killed the seed elsewhere; here they only cut the yield. Faithfulness or opportunity — God counts both in the Day of Rewards.

Matthew 13:9 · Darby

He that has ears, let him hear.

The Lord has just told the crowd the parable of the sower, and He ends it with a challenge instead of an explanation. This short sentence sorts them: some heard only a sound, others took the word home.

The Sentence That Closes the Parable

The parable shows the word received, then dropped — and in some hearts kept and fruitful. The closing call turns that picture into a question for the hearer.

Even where the heart does not refuse the truth, but receives it outwardly, it can abandon it just as quickly. The same will that makes a man gladly receive the gospel makes him drop it in the face of difficulties. But in some cases the word does produce blessed effects. It fell on good ground and brought forth fruit in different degrees. "Who has ears to hear, let him hear." This is a solemn warning to souls. They must look carefully at whether or not they produce according to the truth they have received.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ears That Are More Than Ears

Everyone in the crowd had physical hearing. The ear the Lord means is something else, and it is not self-produced.

While He was here on earth, the Lord often cried, "He who has ears to hear, let him hear." That is, the one who has an inward ear — an ear opened by the Holy Spirit to listen to the messages given and to receive them.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

It is the smallest thing God asks for. Refusing it has cost people before.

It is an ear to hear. It is the very lowest qualification. It is not, Can you work? Can you do anything? Israel in the wilderness had no ear, and was overthrown; so will you be also if you have none. God says: Does My word have any entrance into your hearts? Have you gained any blessing from anything I have ever said to you? Here is My challenge to you: "He who has an ear, let him hear."

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

The Line Between Inside and Outside

The ear shows itself at once in what a person does after the story ends.

He ended it with the solemn words, "He who has ears to hear, let him hear." Having ears to hear, or not having them, would show at once whether a man belonged "within" or "without." Most of His listeners thought it was a pretty story, pleasant to the ear. They left it there, which showed they were outside. Others, including the disciples, were not content with this. They pushed further to reach its inner meaning. They belonged to the inside.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Spoken to One Man at a Time

This call marks a change in how God deals with people. Later teaching never reverses it.

It is not the law laid down to an ordered people on penalty of death. It is the word, wherever received in faith, to produce fruit. The great principle the Lord introduced when He was here is individual responsibility. This He repeats from on high. The kingdom, when set up, in no way weakens it, as we learn here. The church, as we know from elsewhere, brought in the communion of saints, shared submission, and shared action. Even so, God never allows anyone to give up individual responsibility.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Door Left Open to Anyone

The appeal rests on an opened ear, not on birth. So it reaches beyond the crowd in front of Him.

"He who has ears to hear" answers, in principle, to "The sower went out to sow." He spoke it to Israelites, but not to them as a nation in a fixed position. He spoke it to the gracious work going on in their own minds and souls. But in principle, whoever had ears, this being so, it applied to him and was for his profit too; and here any Gentile, or anyone whose ear God opened, came in. It stands as a solemn warning on the sowing of the seed: everything is ruined, and God is acting in grace, taking these pains before judgment falls.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Same Cry Still Sounding

The same call did not stop with that crowd. The Lord sounded it again to churches that had drifted.

It was a summons to the individual to free himself from the heedless mass. The Lord made this appeal to His people on earth. He repeated the same cry to each of the seven churches in Asia: "He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches." In the middle of general church decline, the Lord calls for individual faithfulness in paying attention to His word and His warning.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Ear given. The hearing meant here is an inward ear, opened by the Holy Spirit. It is the lowest thing God asks, and no one can produce it himself.

- Ear tested. What a person does after the parable ends shows whether he is inside or outside. The careless enjoy the story. Others press on for its meaning.

- Ear owned. The call is not law given to a nation. It makes each person responsible, and shared life among believers never cancels that.

- Ear opened wide. The call rests on an opened ear, not on birth. So anyone comes in, Gentile included. Grace takes this trouble before judgment falls.

- Ear still called. The same cry reached the seven churches in Asia. As the church declines, the Lord still asks each person to listen.

Matthew 13:10 · Darby

And the disciples came up and said to him, Why speakest thou to them in parables?

Israel has refused its King. Instead of announcing a kingdom, the Lord tells the crowd a story about a sower — and the disciples want to know why. Their question draws out one of the most solemn answers He ever gave.

A question about something new

The disciples had just heard something new. Their Master had always spoken plainly; now He told a story.

"The disciples came up to Him and said, Why do You speak to them in parables?" This question came right after He had finished this first parable. They had never heard a parable from His lips. Before this, He had spoken to the people and their leaders in simple words that everyone could easily understand. Now, for the first time, He said something they could not grasp. It was veiled. The answer our Lord gives is deeply solemn, because it announces the judgment upon Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the method changed

The change of setting explains the change of method. He leaves the house behind and takes His place by the sea.

The prophet had said, "Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness" — here the King is rejected. Yet if they rejected Him, grace still goes on, and flows out to the Gentiles. The Lord had closed Jewish relationships, and spoken at the end of chapter 12 of a new family, a new relationship formed by the word of God. So He leaves the house, goes to the sea, and instead of a king reigning, it is "Behold, a sower went out to sow."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same words, two opposite effects

A parable does two things at once. The same story that opens the truth to one hearer closes it to another.

The same parable would be just like the cloud of Israel in a former day — full of light to those within, full of obscurity to those outside. So it is with the sayings of our Lord. The crisis with unbelieving Israel was so solemn now that it was not His intention to give clearer light. Conscience was gone. They had the Lord among them, bringing in full light, and He was refused, especially by the religious leaders. He had now broken with them: here was the clue to His conduct. … The truth stayed hidden from the crowd, because they had already rejected the clearest possible proofs that Jesus was the Messiah of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Hearers who had shut their own eyes

His answer links the parables to something that had already happened.

The Lord's answer is telling. It confirms that the teaching of the parables of the kingdom of heaven ties directly to the rejection of the King. This was a case of "judicial blindness." … This is solemn indeed. They could not see because they had refused to see.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Whether the door stayed open

Did God shut these people out on purpose, so that they could never be saved?

This does not mean God hid these things from them because He did not want them converted. In fact, if people would only admit their ignorance and ask in earnest, they too would be converted and find forgiveness of sins. Those who chose to stay ignorant would remain that way.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

This way of teaching also put distance between the Lord and the crowd.

A parable, then, especially in its more formal form, stated divine truth under the cover of an illustration. Only those who were truly hungry for the truth would look inside. For them, there would be no difficulty. … But this speaking in parables suggests a moral distance, a separation between the Lord and the mass of the people. If they were to grasp His teaching, they had to want to.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What "mysteries" means

In His answer the Lord speaks of "mysteries" — the word the ESV translates as "secrets." It does not mean something too deep to grasp. It means a secret now told.

The mystery is no longer "hidden in God" — it is disclosed. You must always keep this in mind when you read about the mystery: it is now revealed, and nothing is left in the dark. The secret is set out in the light of God, and the simplest Christian is expected to receive it. So Christ said to His disciples, "To you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven." … Can any words do more to clear away the common idea that a mystery is something we cannot understand?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Rejection — Israel refused its King. So He leaves the house and sits by the sea. The picture changes from a king reigning to a sower sowing.

- Veil — The disciples had never heard Him speak this way. His first parable hid the truth under a story, and His reply announced judgment on Israel.

- Two sides — One parable works like the cloud of old. It gave light to those inside and darkness to those outside. Conscience in the nation was gone.

- Refusal — The blindness was judicial, yet self-chosen. They could not see because they had refused to see. Only the hungry look inside a parable.

- Secret told — "Mysteries" are not truths too deep to grasp. They are secrets now brought into the light, and the simplest believer is meant to receive them.

Matthew 13:11 · Darby

And he answering said to them, Because to you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of the heavens, but to them it is not given;

The disciples had just asked why their Master taught the crowds in stories instead of plain speech. His answer draws a line straight through His audience. Two questions follow. What are these "secrets of the kingdom of heaven"? And why does one group receive them and not the other?

Why the Lord changed His method

The turn to parables came after a crisis. The same words that opened the truth to some left others in the dark, like the cloud that once stood over Israel.

The same parable would be just like the cloud of Israel long ago — full of light to those inside, full of darkness to those outside. So it is with the sayings of our Lord. The crisis with unbelieving Israel was so solemn that He did not intend to give clearer light. Conscience was gone. They had the Lord among them, bringing in full light, and they refused Him — above all the religious leaders. He had now broken with them: here is the clue to His conduct. It stayed hidden from the crowd, because they had already rejected the clearest possible proofs that Jesus was the Messiah of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The withholding was not random. It answered what the hearers had already done to themselves.

This was a case of "judicial blindness." The Lord quotes Isaiah to show it. That people's heart had grown dull. They barely heard with their ears, and they had shut their eyes. This is solemn indeed. They could not see because they had refused to see.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

What "mystery" means here

The word does not mean a puzzle too deep for anyone to solve. In the Bible it means a secret that God has now told out.

The mystery is no longer "hid in God"; God has disclosed it. Always keep this in mind when you read about the mystery: it is now revealed and nothing is left in the dark. God sets the secret out in His own light, and the simplest Christian is expected to receive it. So Christ said to His disciples, "To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven." All the other mysteries of God are made known in the same way. Could anything more completely clear away the common idea that a mystery is something no one can understand, and that godly people dare not look into?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Revealed, yes — but not to every reader alike. Reading alone will not take it in.

In Scripture the word mystery does not point to what is mysterious, the way people use the word. It presents some distinctive truth that God has disclosed for our understanding. The New Testament holds many such mysteries, and what they contain is there to enlighten the saints. But only those with faith can profit by these divine unveilings. Only the faithful are let into their truths. Only those who have the Spirit of God have the capacity and the power to grasp the mind of God revealed in this way. God wants to bring you and me into His secrets: do we want to know them?

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why the kingdom now has secrets at all

The kingdom itself was no secret. The prophets had already described it. What was new was the shape it took after Israel rejected its King.

We have not had the word "mysteries" before in connection with the kingdom of heaven. The testimony of the prophets about the kingdom had no mystery about it. This comes as a result of Israel rejecting Christ. So notice, in verse 35, that all this stayed secret until now.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

So the kingdom took a form no one had foretold. Its King is not on the scene.

While the King is rejected His kingdom cannot be a public affair. When it is public, the kingdom of heaven will be on open display: the thousand-year reign of Christ. Meanwhile the kingdom is in mystery. The rightful Heir is away, so the kingdom is left in the hands of men who are responsible for it. It stands in a world that has rejected the rightful Heir, a world whose every principle is against God.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

"To you it has been given"

The disciples did not earn their understanding. They had received Him, and knowledge followed as a gift.

Because of their faith, the Lord would make known to them the mystery of the kingdom of God. Even this was a display of His grace. Many prophets and righteous men in Old Testament times had longed to hear the things they were now hearing, but they never had that privilege. You could say this was the Lord's sovereign grace. He chose to bless those who had done what they were responsible to do: they received Him.

Modernised from Mark GrassoOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. The knowledge is a gift, not a reward. The disciples received the Person first; the understanding came after, as grace.

- Given as a secret told. In Scripture a mystery is not something too deep to grasp. It is something once hidden that God has now said out loud.

- Given to those with the Spirit. The secret is out in the open, yet only faith profits by it. The power to take in God's mind comes from God Himself.

- Given because the King was refused. The prophets described a kingdom in open glory. Christ's rejection brought in a kingdom in mystery, run by men while the rightful Heir is away.

- Not given, and why. The same parable lit the way for one group and left the other in the dark. That blindness was God's judgment on people who had first shut their own eyes.

Matthew 13:12 · Darby

for whoever has, to him shall be given, and he shall be caused to be in abundance; but he who has not, even what he has shall be taken away from him.

Jesus has just told the crowd the parable of the sower, and His disciples want to know why He now teaches this way. His answer gives a rule that sounds harsh at first: what a person already holds decides what he receives next.

The Question Behind the Saying

The verse begins with "for". It gives the reason why some understand the Lord's parables and others do not. One writer applies the two halves to two groups: the disciples, and the leaders who had refused Him.

The same parable would be just like the cloud that led Israel long ago — full of light for those inside, full of darkness for those outside... The Lord was among them, bringing in full light, and they refused Him, above all the religious leaders. He had now broken with them, and that is the clue to His conduct... So it was with the disciples. They had already received Him, and now the Lord would give them truth to lead them on. "But from the one who has not" (Israel, who was rejecting Christ), "even what he has will be taken away" — the Lord's presence in person and the proof of His miracles would soon pass away.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What It Means to "Have"

One writer passes on another's description of two kinds of hearer:

Whoever has really made the truths he has heard a living possession will always be given more. But the one who has received it only as something dead and outward will lose even what he seems to have, but really has not.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer ties having to use:

What we do not have in the power of faith for real use, we do not have in deed and in truth.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What Israel Had, and Lost

The second half of the verse lands on a nation with a real head start. One writer explains what Israel held, and what it lacked:

To understand this verse we must see these people in the place of privilege God had given them as a nation. As such they had something the other nations did not have. But they did not have this new thing which Christ was opening out. So as a nation they were about to lose the standing they once had before God. Those who had received Jesus as their Messiah, though, were about to be brought into the kingdom of heaven in its heavenly character.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Responsibility for Light

The saying is not only about Israel long ago. One writer sets it beside the parable of the talents, where a servant loses the one talent he had:

The end of verse 12 is very solemn: "from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away." In another place it reads "seems to have." It is possible to have something that will be taken from you. Where the Lord speaks of the talents, the man with one talent is a servant of the Lord Jesus, yet his talent is taken from him and given to the man who had ten. That talent was light he had; people are responsible for the light they have.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Principle Still Runs

The rule did not end with Israel. One writer applies it to our own day:

But this two-edged sword cuts another way as well. The principle our Lord states here is still at work. The true believers who make up the church have, and in due time we shall have abundance. Meanwhile a Christian world that has fallen away from the faith has not, and will lose even what it boasts of having.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer brings the rule down to one believer's daily life:

If you do not go forward, you will go backward. If you are not making progress, you are falling behind. If you are not entering into what God has given you in His word, you are losing what you already have... Thanks be to the grace of God, this loss is not absolute and final. But we do lose the enjoyment of what is our own.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — The disciples had already received Christ Himself, so He gave them more truth.

- Grasped — To "have" is to make truth a living possession. Truth held only outwardly is what a person merely seems to have.

- Gone — Israel had real privilege as a nation, but not the new thing Christ was opening. Refusing Him, it lost the standing it held.

- Governing — The rule still runs: light is a trust, and people are responsible for the light they have.

- Growing — There is no neutral ground. Not going forward in what God has given is already going backward — losing the enjoyment of it, not the security of it.

Matthew 13:13 · Darby

For this cause I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear nor understand;

Matthew 13 finds the Lord by the sea, teaching the crowds in stories. His disciples ask why He changed His way of speaking, and this verse gives His reason: the crowd could see and hear, yet took nothing in.

Why the teaching style changed

The change did not come out of nowhere.

This is the first time the word parable occurs in the New Testament. The disciples, struck by this way of teaching, asked Him: "Why do you speak to them in parables?" (v. 10). The Lord's answer is telling. It links the parables of the kingdom of heaven directly to the rejection of the king… This was a case of "judicial blindness". The Lord quotes Isaiah to show it: "their eyes they have closed" (v. 15). They could not see because they had refused to see.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

That rejection changed God's dealings with the whole nation.

This rejection of Jesus, and the destruction of Jerusalem that followed, cut short all God's dealings with them as a nation for the time. They were set aside, and a new work began. Meanwhile judicial blindness falls on them, and the words of Isaiah the prophet come true. So He speaks to them in parables… Before this the Lord had not spoken in parables. But now He is the rejected One, and Israel is cut off for the time. None understand except those He instructs.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Who closed the eyes

The verse describes eyes that work and still see nothing. So who closed them?

These people the Lord was speaking about had closed their eyes. It does not say God closed them. They closed them themselves, and so they did not receive the light of this new thing.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The order runs one way, and it still holds today.

Matthew 13:13-15 shows plainly that Israel's wilful blindness came before their judicial blindness… In His absolute justice, God has now confirmed that blindness for the whole time that grace is going out to the Gentiles.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The force of "nor do they understand"

The third failure in the verse is not about eyesight or hearing at all. The Greek word carries the idea of assembling things in the mind.

suniemi (from sun and iemi) means "to bring or set together"… It then stands for the soul's built-in capacity to do this. It joins the outward object to the inward sense. It is to weigh a thing, think it over closely, and so grasp its meaning. See Matthew 13:13-14 and the parallel passages.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

Which failure gets named depends on who was listening:

Take people who did not have the word of God, whom the gospel would test when it went out to them in due time. For them the question was believing something they had never heard before. In Matthew the words go to a people who already had the word, and for them the great thing was to understand it. This they did not do.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One story, two effects

A parable does not hide the truth from everyone. The same words land in two ways.

The same parable would be just like the cloud of Israel in an earlier day — full of light to those inside, full of darkness to those outside. The crisis with unbelieving Israel was so solemn that He did not intend to give clearer light… He kept it from the crowd because they had already rejected the clearest possible proofs that Jesus was the Messiah of God… They loved darkness rather than light. What is the good of a light to one who shuts his eyes?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sharp intelligence is no help here; the difference lies elsewhere.

The design lies on the surface, so the opened eye can read it. Yet, clear as it is, "the wise and prudent" of this world do not see it… But it is always like this in God's teaching: to grasp the truth we must be taught by God. This is absolutely necessary. The keenest intellect is wholly unable to discern the mind of God.

Modernised from J. Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Was this unfair?

The Lord had warned them first.

He had also warned them plainly. If they refused to hear Him, He would bring on them the sentence He went on to pronounce… So they were without excuse. No one can accuse the Lord Jesus of unfairness when He chose to begin speaking to them in parables. The Judge of the earth will always do right, even in judgment.

Modernised from Mark GrassoOriginal wording

Yet the door stayed open to anyone who would ask.

If people would only admit their ignorance and ask in earnest, they too would be converted and find forgiveness of sins. Those who chose to stay ignorant would remain that way.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal first. They saw the clearest proofs and turned them down. Their own hands closed their eyes, and God's judgment then sealed them shut.

- Sentence next. They rejected the King, so His plain speech gave way to parables. He did not take the light away; He veiled it.

- Understanding is the issue. The failing word means to put things together and weigh them; a people who already held God's word would not do it.

- Two sides of one cloud. The same parable is light to those inside and darkness to those outside. Only those taught by God take its meaning.

- Still just, still open. No one can charge God with unfairness here. Anyone who admits ignorance and asks gets an answer, as the disciples did.

Matthew 13:14 · Darby

and in them is filled up the prophecy of Esaias, which says, Hearing ye shall hear and shall not understand, and beholding ye shall behold and not see;

The disciples asked why their Master had begun teaching the crowds in stories they could not decode. His answer reached back seven hundred years, to words God gave Isaiah about a people who would hear and never understand. The Lord said that word was coming true, in full, in the crowd standing in front of Him.

The word "understand"

The verse turns on one verb. Writers who trace the Greek note that "understand" here means more than hearing a sound:

suniemi (from sun and iemi) means "to bring or set together"... As a picture, it came to stand for the soul's own power to do this: it joins the outward object to the inward sense. It means to weigh a thing, think it over carefully, and so grasp what it means.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

So the failure is not in the ears. These people would not put what they heard together with what it meant.

Seven hundred years of waiting

God did not act on Isaiah's word at once. He waited on the nation for centuries:

Israel, as such, had forfeited its place, and therefore was "a people of no understanding" (Isa. 27:11). Long patience had waited on Israel. Seven hundred years had passed since God gave Isaiah the word, "Go and tell this people: you will hear indeed, but not understand." As individuals they might gather around the person of the Lord, but as a nation they were blinded... The testimony to Israel is now closed, though God's final purpose for them is not.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Their choice came first

Does God blind people, or do they blind themselves first? One writer traces the order and the result:

The blinding here is plainly judicial. God Himself has given them sightless eyes and unhearing ears. But why is this? It is no arbitrary judgment. Matthew 13:13-15 shows clearly that Israel's wilful blindness came before their judicial blindness... Now God, in His absolute justice, has confirmed this blindness. It stands for the whole length of the present period of grace to the Gentiles — "until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in."

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Which version He quoted

Matthew's wording of Isaiah does not match the Hebrew text. In the Greek Old Testament the shut eyes are the people's own act, not something done to them. That is the version the Lord used, and He spoke of the prophecy as now completely fulfilled:

Turn to Matthew's Gospel and you will see this. The Lord speaks of the complete fulfilment (anapleroo) of this prophecy, and He quotes the Greek version, not the Hebrew text (Matt. 13:13-15). The people had themselves closed their eyes. Mark and Luke record only the first part of the prophecy, which states Israel's condition of hearing and not understanding. All three agree in showing that the Lord took up teaching in parables because of their unfeeling moral state.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

How long it lasts

In Isaiah the same words are followed by a question and an answer. That answer marks out the age the parables describe:

Our Lord quotes another prophecy of Isaiah, which was now coming true... These words come from Isa. 6:9-10, and there they are joined to what follows. The prophet says, "Then I said, Lord, how long? And He answered, Until the cities lie waste with no inhabitant, and the houses are without people, and the land is utterly desolate, and the LORD has removed people far away, and there is a great forsaking in the midst of the land." The Saviour's quotation from this passage matters. It settles that this predicted period of Israel's desolation is the period in which the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven exist and develop.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Three quotations, one hardening

One writer points out that the same chapter of Isaiah is quoted three times in the New Testament. Read together, the three show one process running to its end:

Paul spoke a final word to the unbelieving Jews before they left, quoting the passage from Isaiah 6 — the passage the Lord Himself quoted in Matthew 13, and John quotes in chapter 12 of his Gospel. This sad and terrible process of hardening and spiritual death had set in even in the days of Isaiah some seven centuries before Christ. It was much stronger when Christ was on earth, and now it has reached its final stage... As a nation they are blinded and without understanding in the things of God, though very sharp about the things of the world. This does not, of course, conflict with God still calling out a remnant according to the election of grace, as Romans 11 states.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Patience. Seven hundred years stood between Isaiah's word and this moment; God waited before He acted on it.

- Refusal. The blinding was not arbitrary — wilful blindness came first, judicial blindness after.

- Their own hands. Matthew quotes the Greek version, where the closed eyes are something the people did to themselves.

- Sentence. Isaiah asked how long, and the answer was desolation. That stretch of time is where the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven run their course.

- Remnant. The nation is set aside for this age, yet grace still calls out people one by one — the hardening is national, never total.

Matthew 13:15 · Darby

for the heart of this people has grown fat, and they have heard heavily with their ears, and they have closed their eyes as asleep, lest they should see with the eyes, and hear with the ears, and understand with the heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

The Lord has just answered a question about why He teaches the crowds in parables. His answer reaches back to Isaiah. Here is a people surrounded by light who cannot take it in. Did God blind them, or did they blind themselves?

Why the Lord turned to parables

The Lord changed how He taught because the nation had rejected Him.

The Lord's answer is telling. It confirms that His teaching in parables about the kingdom of heaven is directly related to the rejection of the king (vs. 11, 13). This was a case of "judicial blindness." The Lord quotes from Isaiah to show this. This is solemn indeed. They could not see because they had refused to see.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The three symptoms named

The verse names three things: a heart, ears, and eyes.

The heart of the people had grown fat. A thick insulation encased it, so that the precious truth of God could make no impression. Their ears had become dulled so as not to hear properly, and they themselves had closed their eyes. This was willful blindness, because they did not want the truth.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The wording matters. Commentators note that this quotation follows the Greek version of the Old Testament. That version puts the closing of the eyes down to the people themselves.

Compare these passages. The Gospels quote this prophecy, and so does the apostle Paul when he speaks to the Jews at Rome. Both point to the nation deliberately closing its own ears. "Their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed" (Acts 28:27). This wording comes from the Greek version of the Old Testament, which gives the passage this turn. Their sin was therefore their own deliberate action, and the nation is held responsible for it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Hardening comes second, never first

This raises the hardest question in the verse: does God make people blind?

The hardening itself is clear and certain. God never made any man bad. But He may give people up to the consequences of their own folly and evil — and in certain cases He does. That is, He hardens in judgment those who despise and reject His grace. All are responsible. Sin destroys the capacity, not the responsibility, of obeying God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer puts the two blindings in order:

The blinding here is a judgment from God. He Himself has given them sightless eyes and ears that do not hear. But why is this? It is no arbitrary judgment. Matthew 13:13-15 shows that Israel's willful blindness came before their judicial blindness. God, in His absolute justice, has now confirmed that blindness for the whole length of the present period of grace to the Gentiles — "until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in."

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Understanding happens in the heart

Mary shows what an open heart does with truth it does not yet understand.

Understanding is of the heart (Matt. 13:15). Mary kept the deep sayings about the Christ in her heart. In secret she kept pondering them, so that she might understand them in time (Luke 2:19, 51).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What healing meant for Israel

The verse ends with healing. For Israel that word covered more than the body.

If Israel would only listen to His voice, every present earthly blessing was to come upon them and overtake them, as the Lord's glorious promise put it. Among these blessings was the removal of all sickness, as we read again and again (Ex. 15:26; Ex. 23:15). So the pardon of their sins and their healing are treated as the same thing (see Matt. 13:15 and Mark).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The door left ajar

A sentence passed on a nation is not a sentence passed on every person in it.

The nation as such is given up to hardness of heart. There is no use in increasing their condemnation with more light. And yet the very fact that He speaks to them at all shows that all are not given up. If any are in earnest enough to look past the outward form, they will still find a gracious heart beating towards them. The national rejection leaves individual responsibility where it always is. He that has an ear, as the Lord tells them, still may hear.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The warning reaches past Israel to anyone who reads it:

Are you a self-satisfied rejecter of the truth? Then beware, in case He gives you up to blindness and hardness of heart too. How long has God held out His hands, ready to receive you?

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Refused — the eyes in this verse are shut from the inside; they could not see because they had refused to see.

- Confirmed — God never starts the hardening. He gives people up to the consequences of their own choice. Sin removes the ability to obey, never the responsibility.

- Heart — understanding is of the heart. Truth pondered there is truth grasped in time.

- Forfeited — what they shut out was healing, which for Israel meant the pardon of their sins.

- Open — the sentence fell on the nation, not on every soul in it; anyone with an ear to hear may still hear, and the warning stands for every reader.

Matthew 13:16 · Darby

But blessed are *your* eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear;

Jesus has just described a crowd who look without seeing and listen without understanding. Then He turns to the small group beside Him and calls their eyes and ears blessed. So where does such sight come from, and can anyone have it today?

A Blessing Set Against a Dark Background

Earlier in the chapter, the same words about seeing and hearing point the other way. One writer shows how the two statements mirror each other, and why the word order changes:

That is how the Lord refers to them in verse 16 of our chapter... It is negative in verse 13, but positive in verse 16. It is striking that when our Lord quotes from Isaiah it says, "You will indeed hear but never understand, and you will indeed see but never perceive." That looks at their side, their responsibility. So hearing comes first. But where God is working in the heart, seeing comes first. The Pharisees saw only what natural eyes can see. They could not see these spiritual realities.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Not a Natural Ability

Sharp senses and a quick mind do not produce this sight.

People say that we gain knowledge in three ways. By observation, using our eyes. By teaching, using our ears. By intuition, using our brains. But these human faculties are of no use when it comes to grasping divine things. That is why we read, "But blessed are your eyes, for they see, and your ears, for they hear."

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

This is why one and the same parable can enlighten one listener and leave another in the dark:

The design lies on the surface, where an opened eye can read it. And yet, clear as it is, "the wise and prudent" of this world do not notice it. Like the pillar of fire, it gives light to Israel and is only darkness to the Egyptian. But it is always like this in divine teaching: to grasp the truth we must be taught by God.

Modernised from J. Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Who the Blessed Ones Are

The Lord Himself says who they are. He points to what they had already done with His voice:

Speaking to His disciples, He said, "Blessed are your eyes, for they see, and your ears, for they hear." They were His followers, because they had heard Him. As the sheep of the "little flock" they had heard the voice of the good Shepherd. When He was instructing His disciples, He described them as those who heard... These had hungered and thirsted after the word of righteousness. They were blessed indeed, for His ministry as the Prophet filled them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What Their Eyes Saw

They did not take it all in at once. Their understanding came later:

Until after the blood had been shed, they knew very little of what those words meant — "Blessed are your eyes, for they see." But what did they see? "The glory of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth." And what they saw, and heard, and touched, they received — the eternal life which was in the bosom of the Father.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What Others Only Longed For

The Lord sets their position beside those who lived before them. One writer draws out the difference in a line:

He Himself emphasised the privileges of their position in Matthew 13:16-17... Others had looked and longed for His coming; the disciples had Him before their eyes day after day.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Same Blessing Reaching Us

The same capacity belongs to believers now:

The Spirit forms in the believer a faculty to understand what is revealed. We read in 1 Corinthians 2:16, "But we have the mind of Christ." This is a remarkable statement. It means we have the thinking faculty of Christ. God has worked in our hearts, so that we recognise He is revealing Himself. And He has given us His Spirit, so that we may understand what is revealed.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

So the same words become a question for us:

The Lord once said to His disciples, "Blessed are your eyes, for they see, and your ears, for they hear." The crowd around them were hard of heart, dull of hearing, and their eyes were closed... Are our eyes and ears spiritually alert in this day? Are we able to enter into the mind of the Lord, and so walk intelligently in a dark world?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Contrast — Verse 16 is the bright reverse of verse 13: closed eyes there, opened eyes here.

- Given — Our own eyes, ears and reasoning cannot reach divine things. God gives this sight.

- Heard — The blessed ones had listened to His voice, like sheep hearing the Shepherd.

- Seen — Their eyes were blessed because they saw the glory of the only Son from the Father, day after day, where others had only longed.

- Alert — The Spirit gives believers now the same capacity to understand. So the question stands: are our eyes and ears awake?

Matthew 13:17 · Darby

for verily I say unto you, that many prophets and righteous [men] have desired to see the things which ye behold and did not see [them], and to hear the things which ye hear and did not hear [them].

The Lord has just explained why the crowd hears only riddles, and now He turns to His own with a word of blessing. This verse shows how much they had. Many faithful people before them wanted the same thing and died without it.

Who the "you" is

The blessing falls on a small group set apart from the nation. One writer explains why the two stand so far apart.

In verse 11 the Lord shows why He speaks in riddles to the crowd. There is now a clear distinction between the remnant and the nation. The nation was under the judgment of blindness that the prophet Isaiah pronounced. Blessed were the eyes of the disciples that saw Emmanuel, the Messiah — the One so many prophets and righteous men hoped for and longed for. All this marks judgment, and a called and spared remnant.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Nothing in them earned that place. One writer shows what stood behind it:

Because of their faith, the Lord would make known to them the mystery of the kingdom of God (v. 11). Yet even this was really a display of His grace. Many prophets and righteous men in Old Testament times had longed to hear the things they were now hearing, but had not had that privilege.

Modernised from Mark GrassoOriginal wording

The word behind "longed"

The word behind "longed" is not a negative word. Older versions translate it "desired."

The word epithumeo means "to desire earnestly," and is often translated "desire," without the thought of the desire being an evil one, as in Matt. 13:17; 1 Tim. 3:1; 1 Peter 1:12.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why they did not see

So why did the prophets miss it? The reason was not in them.

The prophets did not see these things because they were not presented to them. They only came to light when the Lord brought them out. The Father raised up so many of those faithful men and gave them life. They worked wonderfully for God in their day, yet they did not know these wonderful things which have now been made known to us.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The prophets even had to study their own writings. They learned that their service reached past their own lifetime.

The prophets of old spoke both of the sufferings of Christ and of the glories that would follow. But we stand now between sufferings finished and glories yet to come. The prophets were foretelling these things, but they had not yet come. So they searched to see what kind of time the Spirit of Christ in them was pointing to. As they studied their own testimonies, it was revealed to them that they were serving not themselves but us. This is very striking. They were so far from telling out the expectations of their own minds that they had to study their own prophecies to understand them, if possible.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What made that day unrepeatable

Earlier believers had real dealings with God too.

We can recall the privileges of the patriarchs, the prophets and the kings of Old Testament times. The Lord appeared to them and spoke to them. But great as these things were, they could not compare with the presence of the Son of God who had come as man, and the words He spoke and the works He did.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A blessing later readers exceed

That day was not the high point.

But it is plain that even that wonderful privilege was below the mighty increase brought in by His death, resurrection and ascension. That was even more true once the Holy Spirit was given, to grasp it all fully and to bear witness to it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The joy still to come

What about those who longed and died before that day?

Many prophets and righteous men had wanted to see what the disciples saw, but never lived to their day. Will they be robbed of their joy? No. They shall see the day of Christ's glory. They shall see the crop that has come from the seed they sowed in patience and under hardship — seed known perhaps only to themselves and to God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Longing — the word behind "longed" means earnest desire, with nothing bad in it. Prophets and righteous people wanted this with all their heart.

- Withheld — they did not see, because the things were not yet brought out. They studied their own prophecies and learned they were serving a later generation.

- Given — the disciples saw the Messiah Himself. No earlier appearance or word from God could match that.

- Exceeded — even that fell short of what the cross, resurrection, ascension and the gift of the Spirit brought in. Later believers hold more than the disciples held that day.

- Repaid — those who longed and died waiting will still see the day of Christ's glory. They will see the harvest from seed only God saw them sow.

Matthew 13:18 · Darby

*Ye*, therefore, hear the parable of the sower.

The Lord has just told the crowd a story about seed falling on four kinds of ground. Now He turns to His disciples and explains it, and that explanation unlocks the rest of the chapter.

The Lord Interprets His Own Parable

The Lord does not leave the picture to His hearers. He names the birds, the rocky soil and the thorns Himself.

Then follows the explanation of the parable. We have the meaning of "the birds of the air" given to us. It is not left to any guesswork of our own. In Matthew the point is understanding; in Luke, believing. The Jews already knew the word of God, so their great point was to understand what God taught — and self-righteousness never understands. Though they heard with their ears, they did not understand with their hearts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Key to Every Parable That Follows

This first parable comes before the rest for a reason. It sets out the way God now works.

The first parable stands by itself. Unless we understand it, we shall not understand the others. The great work now was to be the sowing of the "word of the kingdom" in the hearts of men. This does not give any special place to the Jew. In verse 19, Jesus said, "When anyone hears," so that opened the door to each hearer of the word, whoever he might be. What was needed was to hear with understanding. Three things work against that: the activities of the devil, the fickleness of the flesh, and the cares and riches of the world. But some do receive the word, and there is fruit in varying measures. This method of divine working is still in use. It marks the day in which we live. Christianity is based not on what it finds in man but on what it produces by the power of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why He Came as a Sower

Christ takes a new role in this parable. The change marks where Israel then stood with God.

The very fact that Christ came as the sower proved that Israel was set aside. If Israel had still been His vineyard, He would have come seeking fruit from the vine He had long before planted. He had come to Israel before, seeking fruit and finding none. He now comes in the new character of the sower, which is quite another thing. He comes into a waste world, where there was nothing, and He begins a fresh work. God is not now looking for fruit from man in one sense, because man has been proved to be a bad tree.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer asks what people can produce on their own.

The Lord came and began to sow the seed which alone can make anyone fruitful. His coming and service proclaimed the ruin of man by the Fall. By nature none of us can be fruitful for God. The first need is the seed, and it must come from outside. The seed is the word of God (Luke 8:11). Nothing less will do. Civilization, training, education and example are all useful in their way. But alone or together, they cannot take the place of the seed. God's voice must be heard in the soul.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why Matthew Calls the Seed "the Word of the Kingdom"

Matthew alone gives the seed this title, and the wording fits the book it sits in.

In Matthew it is the soil. He said, "Hear then the parable of the sower. When anyone hears the word of the kingdom" (13:18-19). It is not hard to see why this should be so in Matthew. There Matthew presents Christ to Israel as the Messiah. Only this Gospel calls the seed "the word of the kingdom." Everything depended on how people received that word about His person and kingdom. That word tested the character of the soil.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

So what stops a hearer from understanding?

We learn another solemn truth from this. The great thing that hinders spiritual understanding is religious prejudice. The Jews were charged with not understanding. They were not idol-worshippers or open unbelievers. But they had a system of religion in their minds, one they had been trained in from childhood. It darkened their grasp of what the Lord was bringing out. So it is now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Gets the Explanation

Everyone in the crowd heard the same words. What they did next divided them.

All heard, but how few cared to know the interpretation... There were those outside — and how many — who did not care to know. There were some who wanted to understand, which showed they were inside. To such it was given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God. This was great favour, but it came with responsibility. The light they received was to be shown to others. So they had to take care what they heard.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Sower — Christ came sowing rather than seeking fruit, because man as he is has none to give.

- Seed — The word of the kingdom comes from outside us. Education, training and example cannot replace it.

- Soil — The seed is faultless, so any failure lies in the ground; the word tests what it lands on.

- Understanding — Matthew asks the hearer to understand, and religious prejudice is the great blocker.

- Key — Miss this parable and the rest of the chapter stays shut. Grasp it, and the light you receive becomes a light to pass on.

Matthew 13:19 · Darby

From every one who hears the word of the kingdom and does not understand [it], the wicked one comes and catches away what was sown in his heart this is he that is sown by the wayside.

Here the Lord starts to explain His own parable. He begins with the saddest case: seed that never gets below the surface. Two questions press. What does it mean to hear and not understand? And how can an enemy carry off what God has just sown?

Why Matthew calls it "the word of the kingdom"

Luke tells the same parable but names the seed differently. That difference fits the aim of each Gospel.

Matthew speaks of understanding — that is the great point for the Gospel writer who speaks of the word of the kingdom. Luke speaks of the word of God — "the seed is the word of God" — so that those who believe (not those who understand) should be saved. Matthew speaks of hearing and understanding, Luke of believing and being saved. This fits the different aims of the Gospels well. In Matthew we see a people of God whom God is already dealing with. The Messiah proclaims the kingdom of heaven and puts them to the test. Those who had set their hearts on worldly things did not understand the Messiah, and did not care for the word of the kingdom.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a question of intelligence

The failure here is not intellectual slowness. The verse itself says where the seed landed — in the heart.

Is it a question of mental capacity, of an intellectual understanding? Certainly not. The Lord says the word was "sown in the heart;" it had appealed to the conscience, and the hearer could either accept it or reject it. But the heart would not have it and turned against it. "And does not understand it" means "he would not understand or receive it."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What hardens the path

A road is hard because of what has passed over it. Commentators point to two different kinds of traffic. One is religious training that leaves no room for anything new from God:

Here is another solemn truth. The main thing that blocks spiritual understanding is religious prejudice. The charge against the Jews was that they did not understand. They were not idol-worshippers or open unbelievers. But they carried a system of religion in their minds, one they had learned from infancy, and it darkened their grasp of what the Lord was bringing out. So it is now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The other is everyday preoccupation. Either way the ground stays too hard for the seed:

The ground where the seed falls is too hard-trodden for it to sink in. It lies exposed to the birds of heaven, and almost tempts the tempter to catch it away. There are many such souls. They are taken up with what hardens them and deadens them to other influences — business or pleasure, lawful or lawless. What matters here is the effect, not how it came about.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Sown in his heart — and still lost

The Lord does not say the word bounced off. He says it landed in the man's heart. That makes the outcome more solemn, not less.

True, the Lord says it was "sown in his heart," and that is a solemn thing... In the parable the word has first been sown in the heart: Satan could not prevent that. It has made its appeal to the conscience and commended itself there as truth. It was sown in the heart for the man to accept or refuse. Conscience approves it, but that is not faith; faith always engages the person's will. Conviction is not acceptance.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The seed suited the hearer's every need, so he cannot hide behind the enemy's work:

The word may be sown in a heart that does not understand it. It may create no link of understanding, of feeling, or of conscience between the heart and God. Then the enemy takes it away, and it does not remain in the heart. The one who heard it is no less guilty. The seed sown in his heart suited every need, both the nature and the condition of man.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The birds and the evil one

In the picture, birds took the seed. Here the Lord names them: the evil one. Nothing is left in this first hearer.

The wayside hearers are those who receive nothing from God. The evil one comes and snatches away what was sown in the heart. Unless the word reaches the conscience, and the man judges his sin before God, there is no new life. The one who only hears stays in a death never lifted from him; he is not born again; he cannot see or enter the kingdom. The seed does not take root. Instead the birds devour it, that is, the enemy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown. The word of the kingdom is placed in the heart itself; Satan cannot stop the sowing, only the taking root.

- Refused. "Does not understand" means the heart would not have it — a decision of the will, not a shortage of intelligence.

- Hardened. Religious prejudice, or plain business and pleasure, beats the path hard. The parable notes the effect, not the cause.

- Snatched. With no root, the enemy carries the word off. The Lord names the birds as the evil one.

- Guilty. The hearer is still responsible. The seed suited his every need, and conviction that stops short of acceptance is not faith.

Matthew 13:20 · Darby

But he that is sown on the rocky places -- this is he who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy,

Jesus has just explained the first kind of soil. Now He turns to seed that falls on rock covered by a thin layer of earth, and to a hearer who takes the word at once with joy — a welcome the Lord still calls a failure.

The ground itself

One writer explains what this ground really is:

"Stony ground" may not mean quite what we usually mean by the word. It is not ground with stones in it, because stones alone would not stop the root from getting down into the earth. What the blessed Lord means here by stony ground is a solid surface of rock, with a very slight and thin coating of earth over it. The seed falls there and — a very remarkable thing — it springs up at once. … It springs up fast in proportion to the lack of depth.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

Feelings moved, conscience untouched

One writer shows which part of the man the word reached, and which part it did not:

"As for what was sown on rocky ground, this is the one who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy" (v. 20). There you have the heart, moved in its affections, but without exercise of conscience. He receives the word with joy right away. There is great gladness about it, but there it ends. Only the Holy Spirit acting on the conscience makes a person see things as they are in God's sight.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the joy comes too soon

One writer sets this joy beside the joy of true converts:

The stony ground hearers are the impressionable yet superficial folk. They respond to the word at once with gladness, but have no real sense of what it means. It was said of true converts that they "received the word in much affliction, with the joy of the Holy Spirit" (1 Thess. 1:6). That affliction came before their gladness. It came from the word convicting them and waking them up to their sin. The stony ground hearer skips over the affliction, because he does not feel his real need. So he lands in a gladness that is only on the surface. It fades when testing comes, and he fades with it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Human nature shown at its best

The first soil showed the word rejected. This one shows it welcomed — and the outcome is the same:

In the next class of hearers, the stony ground illustrates the opposition of the flesh. And for this reason it is pictured, not at its worst, but at its best. This man "hears the word and immediately receives it with joy, yet he has no root in himself." This is not the natural man rejecting the Word. It is the natural man receiving it, and yet there is no more real fruit than in the first case. The seed grows fast. The rocky bed works like a natural hot-bed, so the seed shoots up quickly and full of promise. But the very thing that makes it grow so readily is what stops it from lasting.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Sincere, and still lost

The same writer draws a fine but decisive line:

Such a man believes. He is not insincere, and he is not a hypocrite. The Word simply has no root in him, like seed in stony ground. His heart was never ploughed up by conviction of sin, so it stays as hard as it was. The joy in him was too "immediate"; there was no finding out of self, no taking the place of the lost, that Christ might save. He believed a doctrine; he never came to Jesus. He had joy, not peace. There was no change in the man himself, and no root. Note, it was not what had root that withered, but because it had no root it withered away. It would not have withered had it had root.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

How far a man can go

Another writer draws out what the day of testing exposes:

Let us rejoice with trembling to see how far a person may go, and yet be deceived! … But the testing time came, and if there was no root, there would be no fruit.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Rock — not a field with stones in it, but a slab of rock under a thin layer of earth. The trouble lies underneath, out of sight.

- Speed — the seed springs up fast because the soil is shallow. Quick growth here is the symptom, not the success.

- Joy — the gladness is real, but it comes out of order. Where God works, the word reaches the conscience first, and joy follows conviction.

- Root — nothing withered that had root; it withered because it had none. This man believed a doctrine and had joy, but not peace.

- Fruit — here human nature is at its best. It welcomes the word instead of refusing it, and still bears no more fruit than the first soil. A person can go this far and still be deceived.

Matthew 13:21 · Darby

but has no root in himself, but is for a time only; and when tribulation or persecution happens on account of the word, he is immediately offended.

The Lord is explaining His own parable. This second soil is the most unsettling of the four. The seed springs up fast, the hearer is glad, and then it all collapses. Two words carry the weight: "root" and "immediately." Why does a start that looks so promising end in nothing?

Rock under a thin layer of soil

The picture is not a field with stones scattered through it.

The phrase "on stony ground" does not quite mean what we normally mean by that word. It is not ground with stones in it. Stones by themselves would not stop the root from getting down into the earth. By stony ground the Lord means a solid bed of rock with a very thin coating of earth over it… Its growth at the start is as fast as its withering at the end. It springs up quickly in proportion to how little depth there is… If the first case is indifference, this is shallowness.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Joy that skipped the conscience

Speed and gladness are not the marks of a deep work. Commentators trace the missing root back to something the word never touched.

A conscience touched by the word makes a man serious. He sees himself in the presence of God. That is always a serious thing, however strong the attraction of His grace or the hope His goodness inspires. If the word has not reached the conscience, there is no root. He received the word for the joy it gave; when it brings tribulation, he gives it up.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The parable's three phrases hang together as one chain.

We cannot think too carefully about how these phrases connect: "immediately, with joy," "no root," "withered away." There is great danger in taking in the plan of salvation with the mind only, with no spiritual work in the conscience. This often comes with the most joyful emotions. It works on the natural feelings, but the truth has not gone into the heart. The word has cut no furrow there.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Joy without peace

"Endures for a while" sounds like life that later died. The Lord's own reason says otherwise.

Such a man believes. He is not insincere, not a hypocrite. Simply, the word, like seed in stony ground, has no root in him. His heart, never ploughed up by conviction of sin, stays in unchanged hardness… He had joy, not peace. There was no change in the man himself, and no root. Note, it was not what had root that withered; it withered away because it had no root. It would not have withered if it had had root.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Trouble as the sifter

The trial in the verse is not random misfortune; it arises "on account of the word," and it does a work of its own.

It is God's design for the trial of His saints. It distinguishes true saints from hypocrites. Unsound hearts make a fine show in prosperity, but in a time of persecution they fall away. Hypocrites will follow Christ to the Mount of Olives, but not to Calvary. Suffering times are sifting times. "When He has tried me, I shall come forth as gold."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Caught by the same feelings

Older translations say "offended" where the ESV has "falls away." What springs the trap is the same faculty that welcomed the seed.

He heard the word and immediately received it with joy, yet it had no root in the man himself. It lasts only for a while. But when persecution or tribulation comes because of the word, immediately he is offended — the same word as "immediately" above. Feeling is not conscience. Feeling will act at once to receive. But when trial from within or without tests it, his own feelings turn against him and catch him in a trap.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Where roots are grown

The same sun that scorches shallow corn ripens deep-rooted fruit. What makes the difference lies deeper than the trial itself.

Every test and trial of life has its sure effect on us. They either scorch and wither us, like the corn on rocky ground that dies when the sun is up. Or they bring our Christian life and fruit to maturity. Our secret life with God decides which of the two happens in us. If we are much with Him, we strike our roots down into the knowledge of Him. We draw our refreshment and strength from the hidden springs in Him. Then we need not dread the trial.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Rock — the soil is a slab of stone under a thin skin of earth; the problem is not interference but shallowness.

- Root — the missing root is a conscience the word never reached. Joy came fast because the word had ploughed nothing up first.

- Reality — what withered had never taken root. The Lord's own reason is "because it had no root," not that living faith died.

- Refining — trouble that comes because of the word is God's sifter. It marks off true saints from those who follow Christ only as far as the Mount of Olives.

- Rooting — the same sun that withers the shallow ripens the deep. We strike our roots down in secret with God, before the heat comes.

Matthew 13:22 · Darby

And he that is sown among the thorns -- this is he who hears the word, and the anxious care of this life, and the deceit of riches choke the word, and he becomes unfruitful.

In the parable of the sower, this third soil looks the most promising of the failures. The hearer takes the word in, and something starts to grow. Yet nothing ripens. The reason is not persecution, but the ordinary weight of everyday life.

Ground Already Taken

The trouble starts before the seed lands. The thorns were in the soil already.

The seed fell, but the ground that received it was already overrun with thorns. They appeared well. As far as anyone could see, they had received the seed. There were indeed roots in them, but they were the roots of something else — "other seeds fell among thorns." Those roots were growing there before the seed was scattered. No doubt these thorns seemed weak and unimportant when the word first fell on the soil. Someone may have thought they were pulled up. But the roots stayed in the ground. They sprang up, pushed out the good seed and choked it — and so no fruit came. These hearers profess to receive the word of the kingdom, but they are taken up with the things of this world — its sorrows, its sadness or its delights. The things they busy themselves with are the things that choke the seed — things tied, not to Christ, but to what He will judge.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Question Of Place

The hearer here never rejects the word. He simply ranks it below other things.

The third class of ground, full of thorns, gives the seed no proper welcome either. Perhaps the seed makes a feeble attempt to grow, but the thorns crowd out the grain: it does not continue. This is explained in verse 22 as describing those who, though they hear the word, do not give it a more important place than the cares of this world and the deceitfulness of riches. Present material concerns and desire for this world's goods choke out the more vital, valuable blessing of the word of God. Too many today prefer thorns!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Cares Wearing The Face Of Duty

What makes "the cares of the world" so dangerous is that they rarely look like sin.

These "cares" are very subtle things. They come in as necessary duties, and there is no sin in doing one's duty. In fact, it is right that a man should do his duty in his daily work. But if these duties choke the word, and a man loses his soul through it, what then? And if the love of possession slips into the heart, it checks the power of Christ over the soul and conscience. It eats out the practical life of the Christian, and his soul is withered, withered, withered.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Two Thorns, Two Kinds Of People

The two thorns named here are not aimed at the same person.

The "cares" point especially to the poor man's struggle over how to live at all, how to keep the wolf from the door. This is the struggle for daily food, the cares of this life. If faith does not meet them, they stop the word from thriving in the heart. Those who are well off are especially open to the "deceitfulness of riches," above all when the love of money comes with having it (1 Tim. 6:9-10).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why Money Is Pictured As Thorns

The verse calls riches deceitful. Two pictures show why — one for how empty they are, one for the pain they bring.

As riches are compared to "wind" to show how empty they are (Hosea 12:1), so they are compared to "thorns," to show the trouble they bring (Matt. 13:22). Thorns are no more likely to tear our clothes than riches are to tear our hearts. They are thorns while we gather them; they prick us with worry. As they pierce the hand with the worry of getting, so they wound the heart with the fear of losing.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

It does not take much wealth to do this.

As to the deceitfulness of riches, the smallest possession that the heart is set on is enough to choke the word. How we see this in people who make a profession of faith and have lost all freshness!

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Crowded Out, Not Driven Out

Nothing dramatic happens to this hearer. That is exactly what makes the warning so serious.

This is perhaps a more solemn warning than either of the others. Here the word seems to have taken deeper hold. What overthrows this faith is not the violent assault of persecution, but the quiet influence of things that surround us all. Care for the soul is not despised; it is just crowded out. No sudden attack, no pressure of temptation — just the ordinary wear and tear of life, and, like seed among thorns, the promise of fruit was choked.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

How Thorny Ground Is Cleared

Attacking thorns directly does not clear them. A farmer's field shows the better way.

The farmer may plough and harrow, but for every root he breaks, two plants will grow up, and his field will become a briar patch. Instead, let him sow the field with grass seed, and as the grass grows up it will drive out the briars. This is overcoming evil with good... Let the positive things of Christ fill the heart. Let the word of Christ dwell in us richly, and we will have little room and less desire for the lusts of the flesh.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Roots first. The thorns were in the ground before the seed arrived. The word does not create the rival; it exposes one already there.

- Rivals, not enemies. Cares arrive dressed as necessary duty, and there is no sin in doing your duty — until the duty chokes the word and the soul withers.

- Both ends of the scale. Cares press the poor man scraping for daily bread; the deceit of riches works on those who have plenty. No one is out of range.

- Quiet ruin. No persecution, no sudden attack — just the ordinary wear and tear of life, and the promise of fruit is crowded out.

- Cleared by planting. You do not clear thorns by hacking at roots. Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, and there is little room left for anything else.

Matthew 13:23 · Darby

But he that is sown upon the good ground -- this is he who hears and understands the word, who bears fruit also, and produces, one a hundred, one sixty, and one thirty.

The parable of the sower ends with the one soil that yields a crop. Three questions follow: what made that ground "good," what "understanding" means here, and why the harvest differs from person to person.

One soil in four

One sower, one seed, four soils — and the outcome turns on the ground.

The sower here is the Lord Himself, yet out of four casts of the seed, three are unsuccessful. It is only the last case where the seed bears ripe fruit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the ground is called good

Scripture elsewhere says the human heart is deceitful, so calling any soil "good" needs explaining.

Why are the hearts of some compared to good ground, when Scripture teaches that all hearts are "deceitful and desperately sick"? Not because there is anything naturally good in them. This gives only the facts, not the cause at work. It is simply the fact of the preaching of the word, and the reception of it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

If the first three soils show the devil, human nature, and the world at work, one influence remains to explain the fourth.

We are not told what has made it good, but suppose we have the devil, nature, and the world in the first three cases — what is the only remaining influence? There is nothing but the Holy Spirit. It is very necessary these days to testify that the plough must come before the seed-basket. What makes the heart good? He who has gone out to plough the fallow ground and sow the seed.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Hearing that understands

Everyone in the parable hears. The single word that separates this hearer from the rest is "understands."

What distinguishes the good ground, as far as receiving the word goes, is that a man understands the word. In the opposite case, strictly speaking, he does not understand it. In the two other cases there is the appearance of it, but no fruit. Here one regards nothing but fruit.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer defines that understanding by what the gospel says to a lost person.

What is it here to "understand"? It is the perception that the word of the kingdom, or of God, is what the soul needs. "God shows His love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8). If one may speak this way, God in the gospel says to the sinner: I know your need; you are lost, but I have given My Son to save you.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same parable, three different emphases

Matthew, Mark and Luke each name a different inward action before fruit appears.

In this instance the word is heard in a prepared heart — in an "honest and good heart," as the Lord said (Luke). Looking at the three Gospels, we see three inward actions before the fruit-bearing. 1. Matthew: the hearer understands the word. 2. Mark: he receives it. 3. Luke: he holds it fast.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Each emphasis fits the readers the writer had in view.

In Mark, as with a view to service, it is a question of reception or not. In Luke, as looking on to strangers of the nations, the point is "believing" and being "saved," keeping the word and bringing forth fruit with patience. But the Jew lived in constant contact with religious prejudice and tradition. So he was in particular danger of not "understanding" what was new and of God — the present test of faith.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fruit in three measures

The harvest varies, but no one in this class is barren.

This class alone describes true believers, and all bear fruit, though in three differing measures. Thirtyfold is not large, but it is fruit; sixtyfold is more fruit; and a hundredfold is much fruit (John 15:2-5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The forces that destroyed the first three soils do not disappear once a person believes.

Good ground is always prepared ground. The conscience has been reached, and as a result fruit is produced — but even so, it is in different degrees: some thirty, some sixty, and some a hundredfold. The things which are fatal to the unbeliever may seriously hinder the fruitfulness of the true believer.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What the parable leaves open

One writer weighs two reasons for the different amounts.

Is the difference to be accounted for on the ground of faithfulness or opportunity? The Lord does not take up the question here, but other Scriptures show that both will be taken into account in the great Day of Rewards.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

Summary

- Plough first. Good ground is prepared ground. Nothing in the heart is naturally good, so the plough comes before the seed-basket.

- Seed same. One sower scatters the same word on all four soils; the difference lies in the ground.

- Understanding decides. The mark of this hearer is not hearing but understanding — seeing that this word is what the soul needs.

- Fruit follows. Understanding is proved by a crop, and every one of this class bears some — thirty is not much, but it is fruit.

- Measure varies. The devil, nature and the world no longer destroy the believer, but they can still cut the harvest down.