And Jesus, having sat down opposite the treasury, saw how the crowd was casting money into the treasury; and many rich cast in much.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And a poor widow came and cast in two mites, which is a farthing.
Jesus sits down opposite the temple offering box and watches the crowd file past with their gifts. The one giver He singles out drops in the smallest coins there were. The verse raises the question the whole scene turns on: by what measure does God value what we give?
The people casting in their money had no idea who was studying them. One writer draws out how ordinary the scene looked and how searching it really was.
Charles Henry MackintoshHow little did these people know whose eye was watching them as they cast in their offerings! How little they thought that One was examining them! His eye could reach the deepest depths of their hearts and read the motives behind what they were doing. Maybe the showy Pharisee was there, displaying his wealth and making a proud show of his religion. Jesus saw it all, weighed it all, judged it all.
That watching has not stopped.
Samuel RidoutContrasted with the hypocrisy of the scribes and the showy generosity of the rich, our Lord singles out the poor widow whose heart is in what she gives, a gift measured not by its apparent worth, but by its character. And He still sits opposite the treasury and watches what we cast into it.
She appears immediately after the Lord's warning about the religious teachers, and the placing is deliberate.
Samuel RidoutHis enemies having been silenced, in faithfulness the Lord now warns against their sanctimonious pride (38-40) and contrasts their covetousness, which would devour widows' houses, with the devotion of a poor widow who would cast all her living into the treasury (41-44). This last, Mark and Luke alone record.
The verse names two of the smallest coins in use. Older translations call them mites, and their total a farthing:
J. N. Darby"Lepton" is the smallest coin. "Quadrans" equals 2 lepta.
Why does the verse break the sum into two coins instead of naming the total? Two coins gave her a choice.
C. H. MackintoshReader, did you ever notice the shape in which she had her living? Why does the Spirit take such care to say "Two mites, which make a farthing"? Why not be content to say, "She threw in a farthing"? Ah, this would never do. That would have hidden the real beauty of it, the true touch of wholehearted devotion. If she had had it all in one piece, she must have either given all or nothing. Having it in two, she had the option of keeping half for her own living. Most of us would call it extraordinary devotion to give half of all we had in the world to the Lord's cause. But this poor widow had a whole heart for God.
God applies a different test.
William KellyGod does not go by the amount. He judges not by what you put in, but by what you keep back for yourself. In her case she kept back nothing — she gave it all. Those who gave out of their plenty kept the greater part for themselves. The test of generosity is not what you give, but what you keep. The much that you hold back for your own enjoyment proves how little you gave. But when nothing is left, and everything goes into the treasury of God, there you see divine love and faith truly at work. This poor woman was a widow, and it might have seemed that she of all people had a right to keep what little she had; but no — little as it was, all was for God.
She was funding the upkeep of a building the Lord had already condemned.
F. B. HoleAnd yet the widow gave her two mites to the temple chest that received contributions for the upkeep of the temple building! The Lord had already turned His back on the temple and now was pronouncing its doom. She did not know this. Her understanding was a little behind the times, yet the Lord accepted her gift and valued it by the devoted heart behind it. What a comfort this fact is!
The money may even have ended up in the worst hands.
J. N. DarbyPerhaps the widow's mite helped to pay Judas. But she gave it to the Lord, and her heart, taken up with that small coin, did not escape the Lord's eyes or the notice of His love.
The popular name for this story halves what she did.
William J HockingNow, calling this incident "The Widow's Mite" is a mistake. The widow did not contribute her mite; she gave both her mites — all that she had. Her wholehearted, self-denying devotion drew out the Lord's praise and approval. She gave up all her living to the service of God.
- Seen — The Lord sat opposite the treasury and read the motive behind every coin. He still watches what we put in today.
- Weighed — He judges not by what you put in but by what you keep back. The test is not what you give, but what you keep.
- Halved — Two coins meant she could have kept one. She kept neither, and that is why the Spirit records the sum in pieces.
- Accepted — She gave to a temple already condemned, yet the Lord valued her wholehearted devotion even though she did not understand.
- Named — Call it "the widow's mite" and you cut her gift in half; she gave both, all her living.
And having called his disciples to [him] he said to them, Verily I say unto you, This poor widow has cast in more than all who have cast into the treasury
At the temple treasury, Jesus watches the crowd drop in their money, then calls His disciples over. His verdict reverses the obvious sum: two coins worth almost nothing outweigh the offerings of the wealthy.
None of the givers that day knew who was reading them. One writer pictures the crowd filing past the boxes:
C. H. MackintoshHow little did these people know whose eye was watching them as they cast in their offerings! How little they thought of the One examining them! His eye could reach the deepest depths of their hearts and read the motives behind what they were doing. Perhaps the showy Pharisee was there, showing off his wealth and making a grand display of his religion. Perhaps the cold, going-through-the-motions worshipper was there too, dropping his usual coin into the treasury with no heart in it. Jesus saw it all, weighed it all, judged it all.
"More than all" is not flattery; it is an accurate total, reached by a different method of counting.
William KellyGod does not go by the amount given; He judges not by what you give, but by what you keep back for yourself. In this case she kept nothing back — she gave it all. Those who gave out of their plenty kept the greater part for themselves. The test of generosity is not what you give, but what you keep. But when nothing is left, and everything goes into God's treasury, that is the true working of divine love and faith. That is what God values. It expresses not only generous giving, but complete confidence in Him.
Her whole living was two coins that together made a farthing, as the older translation these writers use puts it. The text could have said simply "a farthing" — but the count of two carries the point.
C. H. MackintoshReader, did you ever notice the form in which she had her living? Why does the Spirit take such care to say "two mites, which make a farthing"? Why not simply say, "She threw in a farthing"? Ah, that would never do. It would not have brought out the real point of beauty, the true touch of wholehearted devotion. If she had had it all in one piece, she would have had to give either all or nothing. Having it in two, she had the option of keeping half for her own living.
Because of this, the familiar expression "the widow's mite" gets her story backwards.
A J PollockNever were coins so wrongly spoken about as these two mites. Someone asks a rich man with thousands to give to a good cause. He writes a cheque for £5 and says with an easy smile, "Well, here is the widow's mite." Is that so? The widow did not give the one mite, but the two, and that was all she had. The widow's mite would be half the rich man's fortune; the two mites, everything he owned. Still, the Lord's commendation of this poor widow's act is very cheering to those who can spare only a little. The Lord appreciates such wholehearted giving.
Her coins went into a treasury run by corrupt men, and the Lord had just denounced them. One writer faces the awkward result:
J. N. DarbyHere the Lord denounces the scribes who corrupted the word of God which they claimed to explain. They kept up the form of godliness. They wanted their own glory and other people's money — even the money of widows, whom they got close to by pretending to be devout. So their judgment would be all the more terrible. But God does not forget His own among the hypocrisy of people who only look religious. They may make mistakes. Perhaps the widow's mite helped to pay Judas. But she gave it to the Lord, and her heart, taken up with that mite, did not escape the Lord's eyes or the notice of His love.
She walked away from the treasury with empty hands. The same eye that recorded the gift saw that too.
William J HockingShe was poor. Her total assets came to one farthing. Yet if she was poor in pennies, she was rich in grace. Like the churches in Macedonia, her deep poverty overflowed in the riches of her generosity. She could not give more than two mites; she would not give less, though it left her with nothing. And you may be sure that He who noticed her noble gift saw her empty purse too, and provided for her, as He loved to do.
- Seen — Nobody at the treasury knew who was watching. Jesus saw every gift, weighed it, and judged the motive behind it.
- Weighed — The measure is not what you give but what you keep back. What you hold on to proves how little you gave.
- All — Two coins meant she could have kept half. She kept nothing, and that is why the text records "two mites" rather than one farthing.
- Misnamed — Calling a small cheque "the widow's mite" turns her act upside down. She gave both coins, all she had. Her example cheers those who can spare little, not those sparing themselves.
- Kept — Her gift may have propped up a corrupt system. But she gave it to the Lord. He noticed her heart, saw her empty purse, and provided for her.
for all have cast in of that which they had in abundance, but she of her destitution has cast in all that she had, the whole of her living.
The Lord had just warned about religious leaders who devour widows' houses. Now He sits facing the temple treasury and watches the money go in. Two small coins from a poor widow outweigh every large gift given that day. The reason He gives turns generous giving upside down.
He does not weigh the sum in the box. He weighs what stays behind in the pocket.
William KellyGod does not go by the amount given. He judges by what you keep back for yourself, not by what you hand in. In her case she kept back nothing — she gave it all. Those who gave out of their plenty kept the greater part for themselves. The test of generosity is not what you give, but what you keep. Keeping much for your own comfort proves how little you really gave. But when nothing is left, when everything goes into God's treasury, you see the true working of Divine love and faith. That is what God values. It expresses not only generous giving, but complete confidence in Him.
Mark notes that her money was in two coins, not one. That small detail carries the point of the story.
C. H. MackintoshWhy does the Spirit take such care to say "two mites, which make a farthing"? Why not be content to say, "She threw in a farthing"? Ah! this would never do. It would have missed the real point of exquisite beauty — the true touch of whole-hearted devotion. If her money had been in one piece, she would have had to give all or nothing. Because it was in two, she could have kept half to live on. Most of us would call it remarkable devotion to give the Lord's cause half of all we had in the world. But this poor widow had a whole heart for God.
The popular phrase "the widow's mite" therefore gets her story backwards.
William J. HockingThe widow did not contribute her mite; she gave both her mites — all that she had. She handed over all she had to live on for the service of God. That whole-hearted, self-denying devotion is what drew the Lord's praise and approval.
The praise for the widow comes straight after a warning.
C. E. StuartFirst comes the warning against the showy scribes, who talked well but lived badly. Then comes the Lord's praise for the poor widow, whose self-denying offering stood against the greed of the scribes and Pharisees.
Her coins went into hands that were far from clean. That did not spoil the gift.
J. N. DarbyGod does not forget His own in the middle of all this hypocrisy from people who only seem religious. They may make mistakes. The widow's mite may even have helped to pay Judas. But she gave it to the Lord, and her heart, taken up with that little coin, did not escape the Lord's eyes or the notice of His love. The rich had given much, but the widow offered herself as a living sacrifice to the Lord; she gave everything she owned. She might have used it better. But she gave her mite to the Lord from the bottom of her heart, and He accepted it. We should think about this.
What she did with her living matched what He was doing with His life.
C. H. MackintoshIt is fairly easy to give tens, hundreds and thousands out of our savings. It is hard to deny ourselves a single luxury or comfort, let alone something we really need. But she gave all her living to the house of her God. This is what gave her a spirit so close to the blessed Lord's own. He could say, "Zeal for Your house has consumed Me." She could say, "Zeal for Your house has consumed my living." So she was very near to Him.
Giving everything left her with nothing — and with One who had seen it all.
J. Wilson SmithBy throwing in all she had to live on, she had reached the extreme of destitution and left herself in absolute poverty. She was a widow and she was poor, yet she loved the interests of the Lord and the honour of His house. With a faith and devotion that put others to shame, she threw her two mites into His treasury. That was her "all." But One saw what she had done, and fully valued such unusual self-denial. Did she suffer? Did she lose? Was her Lord to be her debtor? No. The blessed hand that recorded her hidden act of devotion for us to copy would enrich her a hundredfold in this present life, and answer her faith in His own generous way.
- Measure — The Lord counts what you keep back, not what you drop in. The test of giving is what you have left.
- Choice — She had two coins, so she could have kept half. The second coin proves she held nothing back.
- Contrast — Her self-denial stands against the scribes, whose religion emptied widows' houses.
- Channel — The hands that took her coins were not clean, yet she gave the gift to the Lord and He accepted it.
- Nearness — Giving all she had put her in the same spirit as the One whose zeal for God's house consumed Him. And He who saw her empty purse would not stay her debtor.