And when they draw near to Jerusalem, to Bethphage and Bethany, at the mount of Olives, he sends two of his disciples,
Mark's account of the last week opens as Jesus closes in on Jerusalem and stops at two villages east of the city. From there He sends two disciples ahead on an errand He has planned in detail, as the King prepares to present Himself to His own city.
One writer places this journey between the work He had finished and the work still ahead:
William KellyThe Saviour now sets out on His last journey to Jerusalem. As far as testimony went, this was His final presentation of Himself as the Messiah. He had finished His prophetic work, and the people refused it. The great work of atonement still lay ahead. Between the two comes His royal procession, we may call it, to the city of the Great King.
The errand from Bethphage sets up a prophecy:
Hamilton SmithAs they come near to Jerusalem, preparation is made for the Lord to present Himself to Israel as the Son of David. This fulfils the prophecy of Zechariah (Zech. 9:9). It was a fresh witness to the glory of the Lord and a last testimony to the people. Coming as the King He acts with kingly authority.
The two villages are not just names on a map. One writer finds meaning in both, and in the errand that starts here:
Numerical Bible NotesSo they come near to Jerusalem, to Bethphage (the "house of unripe figs") and Bethany (the "house of affliction" or "humiliation"). Both names mean something for Him. Now He sends two of His disciples to bring Him the colt He is to ride into Jerusalem, proclaiming His Kingdom of peace.
Bethany was more than a stop on the road. It was the one place near Jerusalem where He was welcome:
Morrish Bible DictionaryA village on the eastern slope of the Mount of Olives, about 2 miles from Jerusalem, near the road to Jericho. Lazarus, Martha, and Mary lived there. In their house the Lord found a resting place, among people He loved. They were always ready to welcome Him and to give Him the best of what they had. It was from or near Bethany that the Lord ascended.
This hill gathers up Israel's whole story — past, present and future:
The Bible TreasuryIn Zechariah 14 the Lord appears to deliver them, in the place from which the "glory" of the God of Israel departed... From the same place He had entered Jerusalem as their King, according to this prophet (Zech. 9:9), riding on a donkey's colt. On the same Mount of Olives He sat, in Matthew 24, surrounded by His Jewish disciples, after He had left His nation... His nation rejected Him and crucified Him. Then from that same mountain He ascended to heaven (Acts 1). And on that same mountain His feet will stand when He returns to deliver them fully and completely in grace!
Nobody suggested this to Jesus. He arranged it Himself, down to the location of the animal:
C E StuartBut who suggested that? The crowd did not bring an animal richly decorated. The disciples had not prepared the colt, nor asked the Lord to mount it. The Lord took the initiative by sending two of His disciples to the entrance of Bethphage to get it... Zechariah had foretold that the foal would be available for the King's use. The Lord told them exactly where it was standing at that moment.
The two disciples are sent with an answer ready, in case anyone challenges them:
Hamilton SmithIf anyone asked why the disciples were untying the colt, it was enough to answer, "The Lord has need of it," and every question would stop at once. That is what happened, and so it will be in the coming day of glory, when it will be true of Zion that "Your people will offer themselves freely on the day of your power" (Ps. 110:3).
- Timing — This is His last public presentation as Messiah. The prophetic ministry was finished and refused. The atoning work still lay ahead. This royal approach stands between the two.
- Fulfilment — The colt was not improvised. The errand fulfils Zechariah 9:9 and gives the nation a last testimony.
- Names — Bethphage means "house of unripe figs" and Bethany "house of affliction." Both names meant something for Him. Yet Bethany was also the home where He was loved and welcomed.
- Place — The Mount of Olives ties four things together: the glory that departed, the King who entered, the Lord who ascended, and the feet that will stand there again.
- Authority — "The Lord has need of it" was answer enough to stop every question. One day Zion's people will offer themselves just as freely.
and says to them, Go into the village which is over against you, and immediately on entering into it ye will find a colt tied, upon which no [child] of man has ever sat loose it and lead it [here].
The Lord is about to enter Jerusalem for the last time, and He starts by sending two disciples for a colt that no one has ever ridden. Everything hangs on two questions: does He already know it is there, and what right has He to another man's animal?
The errand is not a detail before the entry; it is the entry.
Hamilton SmithAs they came near to Jerusalem, preparations begin for presenting the Lord to Israel as the Son of David. This fulfils the prophecy of Zechariah (Zech. 9:9). This was a fresh witness to the glory of the Lord and a last testimony to the people. Coming as the King, He acts with a king's authority.
Nobody suggested this to Him.
C E StuartThe Lord took the initiative by sending two of His disciples to the entrance of Bethphage to get it. Mark tells us the foal was there, tied at a door outside in the open street... He told them where to find it, what to do, and what to say to the owners. Zechariah had foretold that the foal would be available for the King's use. The Lord made known where it was standing at that moment.
In anyone else, sending two men to untie an animal they do not own would be theft. Here the right rests on who He is.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThis act of the Lord flashes out once more His glory and shows that the King-Messiah is Jehovah. He knew that over there was a donkey tied with a colt, just as He knew the fish and the piece of silver in the sea... He demands the use of the donkey and the colt. He has a right to them, for He is the Creator. He can say, as He has said: "For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle on a thousand hills."
Commentators differ on how much weight the title carries. Gaebelein reads it as Jehovah's own claim. William Kelly thinks the word is left open on purpose, and points to God's hand on the people who watched.
William KellyIt is above all a scene under the governing hand of God. He would and did control the feelings of those who watched the colt being taken. In the same way He later directed the deeds and shouts of the crowd along the road... I suspect "the Lord" is here left vague on purpose. The Lord had need of the donkey's colt, whether they applied the title to Jehovah or to the king who came in His name.
The claim is real, but it is not confiscation.
C E StuartThe owners saw the disciples untying the colt, and asked the reason. They answered as the Master had directed: "The Lord has need of him, and He will send him back here at once." So it seems Mark wrote (11:3). The words show that the Master needed the colt for a short time only. He would return it when He was done with it.
An unbroken colt should have thrown a rider, especially in a shouting crowd. Instead it carries Him quietly. One writer reads the whole sequence — tied, loosed, ridden — as a picture of what happens to a person.
F. B. HoleThe colt was unbroken, for no man had sat on it, and so it was tied up under restraint. It was loosed from restraint, but only so that He might sit on it. Under His powerful hand it was perfectly restrained. This is a parable of how grace sets us free from the bondage of the law.
The same picture is pressed further: the untamed creature stands for a stubborn nation, and its docility for what is still to come.
Leslie M. GrantThe colt of a donkey is surely a picture of Israel in her unbroken state of rebellion, yet held back by being tied (under bondage to law)... They untie the colt, so that the Lord Jesus might have rightful control... The Lord Jesus takes the reins, and the donkey becomes completely docile. How precious is this picture of what His grace can do in the heart of a stubborn person! It is also a picture of what Psalm 110:3 says about Israel in the future — that His people will be willing in the day of His power.
The One who owns the cattle on a thousand hills asks for a borrowed donkey.
F. B. HoleThe Lord had need of that colt, and He knew who the owner was and that His need would meet with a ready response. He was the Servant of the will of God. He knew where to find everything His service needed — the donkey in this chapter, the guest-chamber in Mark 14, and other things at other times.
- Need. He asks for a colt He already owns as Creator. The owners hear that the Lord has need of it, and they let it go.
- Knowledge. He named the village, the animal and the tether in advance, and He told the two what to say. Prophecy promised a foal; He said where it stood.
- Loosed. The colt was tied and held back. They untied it for one purpose: that Christ might take the reins. Freedom here means coming under His hand.
- Willing. The owners hand it over and the crowd's shouts fall into place. God moved every heart involved — a foretaste of the day when His people will be willing.
- Returned. He borrows and sends back. The King's absolute claim never turns into robbery — He takes only what He needs, and only for as long as He needs it.
And if any one say to you, Why do ye this? say, The Lord has need of it; and straightway he sends it hither.
Jesus sends two disciples into a village to take an animal that belongs to someone else. He gives them one sentence to say if anyone stops them — and that sentence raises three questions. Who is "the Lord" here? By what right does He take another man's property? And why did the owners let it go?
The message the disciples carry is not a request but a claim, and it rests on who owns the animal:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThis act of the Lord flashes out once more His glory, and shows that the King-Messiah is Jehovah. He knew that an ass was tied there with a colt, just as He knew about the fish and the piece of silver in the sea. As He commanded the fish with the coin to come to Peter's hook, so here He demands the use of the ass and colt. He has a right to them, for He is the Creator, and He can say as He has said: "For every beast of the forest is mine, the cattle on a thousand hills" (Ps. 50:10).
Mark uses this title for Jesus with striking restraint:
William KellyThe only place where "Lord" stands for Jesus in the undisputed part of Mark is Mark 11:3, and then in Christ's own mouth.
Commentators differ on how much the owners were meant to hear in it — the name of God, Jehovah, or only a royal title. The same writer thinks the wording was left open on purpose:
William KellyI suspect "the Lord" is here, as in Mark 5:19, left purposely vague. The Lord had need of the ass's colt, whether they referred the title to Jehovah or to the king who thus came in His name. If their faith really recognised the Messiah in Jehovah it was most true, and so much the better for those who did.
Foreknowledge alone does not explain why the owners let the colt go:
J. N. DarbyThey were to say simply: "The Lord has need of it and will send it back here immediately." So He knew and ordered a heart at a distance. He showed how David's Lord had good right to be David's Son — indeed, to be received as such by the title of His own person and glory. He who did these things by this divine power and ordering was making His claim in grace, and in no needless untruth, to the place of David's Son. Everything was already subject to Him, whatever He might subject Himself to. This was over several hearts, whoever they were, so that it was not just knowledge of the owner, but control of their hearts.
The colt was not there by chance, and the claim on it ends with a promise:
C E StuartZechariah had foretold that the foal would be ready for the King's use. The Lord made known where it was standing at that moment. It was there ready to bring in the King, as prophecy said. The owners saw the disciples untying the colt and asked the reason. They answered as the Master had directed: "The Lord has need of him, and immediately He will send him back here." So it seems Mark wrote. He meant that the Master needed it for a short time, and would give it back when He had finished with it.
Commentators differ on who does the sending back. The ESV leaves it open:
William KellyThe subject of "sends" is "anyone," not "the Lord" — that is, the man is to send them back, not Jesus. Christ's "the Lord" is plainly used of Himself.
The animal itself carries a lesson about freedom:
F. B. HoleThe colt was unbroken, for no one had sat on it, and so it was tied up under restraint. It was loosed from restraint, but only so that He might sit on it. Under His powerful hand it was perfectly restrained. This is a parable of how grace sets us free from the bondage of the law.
The willingness shown that day points forward to a wider one:
Hamilton SmithComing as the King, He acts with kingly authority. If anyone asked why the disciples were untying the colt, one reply was enough: "that the Lord has need of him." Every question would stop at once. So it happened, and so it will be in the coming day of glory, when it will be true of Zion that "Your people will offer themselves freely on the day of your power" (Ps. 110:3).
- Right. The claim rests on ownership. Every beast of the forest is already His, so the Creator is only collecting what is His own.
- Reach. His word crossed a distance to hearts He had never met. That is more than knowing the owner; it is control of his will.
- Reserve. Almost nowhere else in Mark does "Lord" stand for Jesus, and here it comes from His own mouth. Commentators differ on whether the owners were meant to hear "Jehovah" in it.
- Return. The claim came with a promise to send the animal back. What He takes for His service, He takes for a purpose.
- Release. He had the colt untied only so He could sit on it. Under His hand the unbroken animal stood perfectly steady — a picture of the willing people of Psalm 110:3.
And they departed, and found a colt bound to the door without at the crossway, and they loose him.
Two disciples go ahead with only a description, and find the colt tied at a door in the open street, just as Jesus said. Mark's small details raise big questions: how did Jesus know, by what right did He take another man's colt, and why does untying it matter?
Nobody proposed this ride. The Lord arranged it Himself.
C E StuartThe crowd did not bring a richly decorated animal. The disciples had not prepared the colt, nor asked the Lord to mount it. The Lord took the initiative by sending two of His disciples to the entrance of Bethphage to get it. For the foal was there, tied at a door outside in the open street, as Mark tells us — or perhaps at a cross-way leading round the house. He told them where to find it, what to do, and what to say to the owners. Zechariah had foretold that the foal would be available for the King's use. The Lord made known where it was actually standing at that moment. It was there ready to bring in the King, according to prophecy.
Other writers set this beside the rest of what He knew in advance.
The Bible TreasuryMark 2:8 and John 6:61 prove that His knowledge was not human but divine... He could and did point out beforehand the coin in the fish's mouth, the whereabouts of the donkey's colt, and the man carrying the jar of water.
This detail of place comes from Mark. Some older translations read "in a place where two ways met" instead of the ESV's "outside in the street."
C E StuartTurning to Mark, we learn where exactly at Bethphage the two disciples found the foal. It was tied to a door outside where two ways met, that is, at the crossing... Mark's character as a historian who attends to details comes out here very distinctly.
Two men untying a stranger's animal in the street would look like theft.
Leslie M. GrantOnly the Lord could give such instructions, for all things are His property; for anyone else to do this would be stealing. No difficulty arose, for the words "the Lord has need of him" settled the matter even for the owners, who at first questioned the disciples.
One writer reads the whole scene as governed by God. He also leaves open who "the Lord" in the message is.
William KellyIt is above all a scene under the governing hand of God. He would and did control the feelings of those who watched the colt taken. In the same way He later directed the actions and shouts of the crowd along the road... The Lord had need of the donkey's colt, whether they took the title to mean Jehovah or the king who came in His name.
Why was the colt tied, and what did untying it give?
F. B. HoleThe colt was unbroken, for no one had ever sat on it, and so it was tied up under restraint. It was loosed from restraint, but only so that He might sit on it. Under His powerful hand it was perfectly held in check. This is a picture of how grace sets us free from the bondage of the law.
Reading the older wording, one writer sees a picture of the nation itself standing at a junction.
Leslie M. GrantThe colt of a donkey is no doubt typical of Israel in her unbroken state of rebellion, yet restrained by being tied (under bondage to law). The two ways meeting there show that Israel was now brought to the crossroads: which way would she take? She was outside the door, not having entered into the blessings God has provided for that nation.
That easy consent points forward. One writer sees in it a sample of a day still to come.
Hamilton SmithIf anyone asked why the disciples were untying the colt, it was enough to reply "that the Lord has need of him." Every question would stop at once. So it happened. And so it will be in the coming day of glory. Then this will be true of Zion: "Your people will offer themselves freely on the day of your power" (Psalm 110:3).
- Foreseen — Christ knew where the colt stood, tied at a door in the open, before anyone went to look.
- Owned — Only One who owns all things could send men to untie another's animal; from anyone else it would be theft.
- Loosed — It was untied not to run wild but to carry Him; freedom here means passing under His hand.
- Willing — Objectors raised their question, heard "the Lord has need of it," and let it go.
- Prophesied — Zechariah had said the colt would be ready for the King, and there it stood. It is a small preview of the day when His people offer themselves freely.
And some of those who stood there said to them, What are ye doing, loosing the colt?
Two disciples untie an animal that is not theirs, and bystanders challenge them. The Lord had already given them their answer, and one sentence about His need settled it.
The whole errand began with Jesus, not with the crowd or the disciples. He named the place, the animal, and the words to use before anyone had raised an objection.
C E StuartThe crowd did not bring an animal in rich harness. The disciples had not prepared the colt, nor asked the Lord to mount it. The Lord took the initiative by sending two of His disciples to the entrance of Bethphage to get it. Mark tells us the foal was tied at a door outside in the open street, or perhaps a crossway leading round the house. He told them where to find it, what to do, and what to say to the owners. Zechariah had foretold that the foal would be available for the King's use. The Lord made known where it was standing at that moment. It was there ready to bring in the King, as prophecy said.
Zechariah is the prophet who foretold this King's coming.
The disciples had no argument to make and no permission to produce. They had one sentence, and it was enough.
Hamilton SmithAs they came near to Jerusalem, everything was made ready for the Lord to present Himself to Israel as the Son of David, fulfilling the prophecy of Zechariah (Zech. 9:9)… Coming as the King He acts with kingly authority. If anyone asked why the disciples were untying the colt, one reply was enough: "that the Lord has need of him." At once every question would cease. So it happened. And so it will be in the coming day of glory, when it will be true of Zion: "Your people will offer themselves freely on the day of your power." (Ps. 110:3).
Taking someone else's animal is theft — unless the one who sends you already owns it.
Leslie M. GrantOnly the Lord could give such instructions, because all things are His property. For anyone else to do this would be stealing. No difficulty presented itself, for the words, "the Lord has need of him" settled the matter even for the owners, who at first questioned the disciples.
Commentators differ on what the title "the Lord" meant to those listening. One reads the reply as the owner of all things claiming what is His by right. Another suspects the title is left vague on purpose.
William KellyAbove all, this is a scene under the governing hand of God. He would and did control the feelings of those who saw the colt taken. In the same way He later directed the deeds and shouts of the crowd along the way. "The plans of the heart belong to man, but the answer of the tongue is from the LORD." This is so true here that I suspect "the Lord" is left vague on purpose, as in Mark 5:19. The Lord had need of the donkey's colt, whether they took the title to mean Jehovah or the king who came in His name. Only in the two closing verses of this Gospel can we be sure He is called "the Lord."
Mark notes where the colt stood and what it was tied to. Those details carry a picture.
Leslie M. GrantThey found the colt tied by a door in a place where two ways met. The colt of a donkey surely pictures Israel in her unbroken state of rebellion, yet held back by being tied (under bondage to law). The two ways meeting there show that Israel had now come to the crossroads: which way would she take?… They untie the colt (a picture of release from bondage to law), so that the Lord Jesus may take rightful control… He takes the reins, and the donkey becomes completely tame. How precious this picture is of what His grace can do in the heart of a stubborn person!
The colt was set free for one use only. That has something to say to anyone who serves Christ today.
F. A. HughesThe Spirit of God has been careful to tell us that the disciples did just what the Lord told them. The result was the colt set free for the purpose the Lord needed it for. The Lord Himself has gone from the scene, but His Name and His interests are here. So we should care that all we do and say sets affections free and attaches them in loyalty to an absent Christ.
- He asks first. The errand starts with Christ. He names the place, the colt, and the reply before a single bystander speaks.
- He owns already. For anyone else this would be theft; the claim only stands because everything is His property.
- He needs anyway. The one who owns it all still says He has need of it — and that sentence, not a permit, settles the question.
- He is given willingly. God was governing hearts that day, so the bystanders let them go. It points ahead to Zion's people offering themselves freely on the day of His power.
- He is carried. The colt is untied only so the Lord may ride — the pattern for every service done in His Name while He is absent.
And they said to them as Jesus had commanded. And they let them [do it].
Two disciples walk into a village, untie an animal that is not theirs, and are challenged on the spot. They repeat one sentence, and the objection collapses. What did that sentence claim, and why did it work?
The disciples add nothing of their own. They repeat His words, and the matter is closed. One writer links the scene to the prophet Zechariah, and reads the instant compliance as a preview of a future day:
Hamilton SmithNear Jerusalem, preparation is made to present the Lord to Israel as the Son of David. This fulfils the prophecy of Zechariah (Zechariah 9:9). Coming as the King, He acts with kingly authority. If anyone asked why the disciples were untying the colt, one reply was enough: "the Lord has need of him." At once every question would cease. So it happened. So it will be in the coming day of glory, when it will be true of Zion that "Your people will offer themselves freely on the day of your power" (Psalm 110:3).
The sentence asks no permission. It states a right, and everything turns on whose right it is:
Leslie M. GrantOnly the Lord could give such instructions, because all things are His property. For anyone else, this would be stealing. No difficulty appeared. The owners questioned the disciples at first, but the words "the Lord has need of him" settled the matter even for them.
The owners had every natural reason to refuse, and they did not. One writer looks past them to the hand behind the scene, and weighs how much the title "the Lord" was meant to claim:
William KellyThis is above all a scene under the governing hand of God. He would and did control the feelings of those who watched the disciples take the colt. Later He directed the deeds and shouts of the crowd along the road in the same way. "The plans of the heart belong to man, but the answer of the tongue is from the LORD." This is so true that I suspect the title "the Lord" here is left vague on purpose, as it is in Mark 5:19. The Lord had need of the donkey's colt, whether they applied the title to Jehovah or to the king who came in His name.
The message had a second half. What He claims, He also promises to send back:
C. E. StuartThe owners saw the disciples untying the colt and asked why. They answered as their Master had told them: "The Lord has need of him, and He will send him back here at once." So it seems Mark wrote (11:3). The Master needed the colt for a short time, and would give it back when He had finished with it.
Some read the animal as a picture. It stands tied outside a door where two roads meet:
Leslie M. GrantThey found the colt tied by a door in a place where two ways met. The colt of a donkey is no doubt typical of Israel in her unbroken state of rebellion, yet restrained by being tied (under bondage to law). The two ways meeting there show that Israel was now brought to the crossroads: which way would she take?... They untie the colt (typically from legal bondage), so that the Lord Jesus may be given rightful control. The Lord Jesus takes the reins, and the donkey becomes thoroughly docile. How precious is this picture of what His grace can do in the heart of a stubborn person!
Another writer rejects that reading. For him the detail matters for a plainer reason — He said what would happen, and it happened:
William KellyWriters old and new have laboured to find in this remarkable incident a picture of the Gentiles obeying the gospel, since the Lord received and rode the colt. That seems to me far from intelligent. It was simply the evidence of His divine knowledge, and the assertion among the Jews of His claim as Jehovah Messiah. That claim was proved by facts, and by the submission of human hearts wherever God was pleased to produce it for the honour of His Son. That is why the Spirit records the exact words spoken, and how everything He said came true.
- Claim — "The Lord has need of him" does not ask a favour. It claims ownership. From any other lips the same act would be theft.
- Word — The disciples add nothing of their own. They repeat His sentence, and the objection dies.
- Willingness — The owners let the colt go because God governed their feelings. It is a small foretaste of the day when His people offer themselves freely (Psalm 110:3).
- Return — The claim came with a promise to send the colt straight back; He takes for a purpose, not for keeps.
- Picture — Commentators differ. Some see a stubborn creature untied and made docile under His hand. Others see plain proof of His divine knowledge and His claim as Messiah.
And they led the colt to Jesus, and cast their clothes upon it, and he sat on it;
Jesus is almost at Jerusalem, and two disciples come back from a nearby village with a young donkey no one has ever ridden. In this one verse the King of Israel presents Himself to His city, and every detail counts.
The colt did not belong to the disciples. They took it on the strength of one sentence from Jesus. One writer hears in that sentence the right of Israel's God over all He has made:
William KellyThe sending for the colt shows the Lord as Jehovah, who has a perfect right to all. "The Lord (Jehovah) has need of them." Nothing could be more thorough than His knowledge of circumstances still hidden in the future. How clear His control over the owner's mind and feeling! He was meek, sitting on a donkey, the King of Zion the prophet spoke of. Yet He was as surely Jehovah as He was the Messiah coming in His name. That "need of them" is as amazing as the glory of His person.
Another writer hears the words as a king's command, and notes that they ended every objection:
Hamilton SmithHe comes as the King, and He acts with royal authority. If anyone asked why the disciples were untying the colt, one answer was enough: "the Lord has need of it." Every question stopped at once. So it happened then, and so it will be in the coming day of glory. Then it will be true of Zion that "Your people will offer themselves freely on the day of your power" (Ps. 110:3).
Mark has already told us no one had ever sat on this colt. An unbroken animal carried Him through a shouting crowd and did not bolt. That says something about who He is:
Truth & TestimonyMatthew 21 describes Jesus as meek, yet He also shows features of power. The power of the Creator shows in His sitting on an unbroken colt (Mark 11:2, 7).
The tying, the untying and the sitting carry a lesson beyond that day:
F. B. HoleThe colt was unbroken, for no one had ever sat on it, so they kept it tied up. They untied it for one reason only: so that He might sit on it. Under His powerful hand it stayed completely under control. This is a picture of how grace sets us free from the bondage of the law.
There was no royal harness. The King rode on His followers' own clothing:
C. E. StuartWithout further discussion the two disciples led off the foal. They first laid their garments on its back, and then seated the Lord on it. Nor was that enough: others spread their garments on the road, carpeting the track He was to pass over.
This was not just a burst of enthusiasm. One writer traces the whole scene back to God at work behind it:
J. N. DarbyThe same divine power was controlling the hearts of the disciples and of the crowd. It moved them to give this testimony to the royalty of Jesus, and to fulfil the words of the Prophet. "They threw their cloaks on it, and he sat on it." A new position for the lowly Jesus — yet lovely even in this.
The choice of mount was the message. A donkey was not what people expected a king to ride:
L. M. GrantThere is no record of any king of Israel riding a donkey, for the donkey is the symbol of lowliness. A king would normally ride a horse, the symbol of strength and conquest. That will be true of the Lord Jesus in a future day, when He comes in majestic power as "King of kings and Lord of lords" (Rev. 19:11-16).
Matthew mentions the mother donkey as well; Mark, Luke and John speak only of the colt. One writer sees meaning in what Mark leaves out:
Samuel RidoutThe colt here is seen alone, and not, as in Matthew, in company with its mother. It is grace entirely, not government.
- Claimed. "The Lord has need of it" was enough. He has a perfect right to all, and He controlled the owner's mind and feeling.
- Loosed. The colt was tied because it was unbroken; it was untied for one purpose only — that He might sit on it.
- Steadied. An animal no one had ever ridden carried Him calmly through a shouting crowd. Under His hand it stayed perfectly under control.
- Clothed. He had no saddle and no royal harness. His followers laid down their own garments, and God was moving the hands that laid them.
- Lowly. The King came on a donkey, the sign of lowliness — grace first. The horse of strength and conquest belongs to a future day.
and many strewed their clothes on the way, and others cut down branches from the trees [and went on strewing them on the way].
Jesus rides into Jerusalem, and the crowd turns the road into a carpet of cloaks and cut branches. Commentators read this as a true royal welcome: God moved the people to honour a King who came in humility, and who would be rejected within days.
The garments and the branches were the crowd's way of saying who He was to them. One writer links these acts to the names the people called Him:
J. G. BellettThey spread their garments and scattered branches of trees in the way. These acts expressed the honour in which the crowd held Him, and the joy with which they greeted Him. The people hailed Him as King (Luke 19:38). They called Him "the Son of David," and so recognised His right to the throne of David (Mark 11:10).
The welcome fits a king. The animal He rides does not fit what people expect:
Leslie M. GrantVerse 8 shows this too. Many spread their garments on the road He was riding. Others cut down branches of trees to form an avenue of royal welcome for Him. He came in lowly humility, yet the honour given Him is worthy of the King presented in majesty and glory. Of course, a king in royal splendour would be riding a magnificent war horse, not a donkey. But Zechariah 9:9 had prophesied this unusual and striking event, and God's hand in arranging the scenes is unmistakable.
The crowd had seen His miracles, but excitement and reasoning do not explain this scene. One writer traces it to the power of God:
J. N. DarbyA very great multitude is moved by the power of God. They have also seen His miracles, above all the raising of Lazarus. They go before Him and surround Him. They spread their garments in the way, and cut down branches from the trees to throw on His path. They give Him the place and glory of a king, and in fact recognise Him as the royal Messiah. It is an admirable scene. The question here is not the cold reasoning of man's intellect. Nor is it only the effect of His miraculous deeds, though the scene is a fruit of these. It is the mighty working of God on the minds of the crowd, which makes it testify for a short time to the despised Son of God.
J. G. Bellett adds that the crowd itself did not grasp what it was doing:
J. G. BellettIt may be that they neither understood nor intended any of this. But God moved them to take the part they did, so that the whole scene might present their King, in full form, to the city and nation of the Jews.
The branches recall Israel's Feast of Tabernacles, when the people lived in shelters made of leafy branches. One writer sees this entry as a sketch of that feast, and notes which Gospel leaves the branches out:
H. L. RossierThe branches and palms sketched out this same feast when Jesus entered Jerusalem, in Matthew 21:8, Mark 11:8 and John 12:12. There the crowds acknowledged Him as the son of David and as king of Israel. In Luke 19, we find neither palms nor branches. The disciples do bless the king who comes in the name of the Lord, but they say "Peace in heaven", not "On earth peace" (compare Luke 2:14). And in Luke we see Jesus weep over Jerusalem (v. 41). The true feast of tabernacles, the final feast, still waits for a future day, as Zechariah 14:16 says.
Days later, the same crowd sent Him to the cross. One writer draws the hard lesson:
William KellyIt is a terrible thing to see how fickle the multitude is. They are just the same to this day, and they will never be any other until the Lord changes the face of all peoples. The same crowd cried, "Hosanna to the Son of David!" and applauded Him to the skies. Within a few days that same crowd cried with one mouth, "Crucify him, crucify him!" Applause is only human feeling stirred up for the moment. That feeling can swing to the very opposite, and swing fast.
Older English Bibles say the branches were cut "off the trees." The ESV reads "leafy branches that they had cut from the fields." One writer who studied the oldest manuscripts preferred the second reading, and explained where the other came from:
William KellyThe common wording comes from the usual habit of making this Gospel agree with the parallel passages in Matthew and Luke. The main departure from the common text is in the last clause, where the shorter phrase "having cut them from the fields" is found in the Sinai and Vatican manuscripts, among others.
- God moved. No one organised this welcome, and no argument produced it. God worked on the crowd's minds to draw out testimony to His Son.
- Men honoured. Cloaks and branches on the road expressed the honour and joy of a people greeting their King, the Son of David.
- The King was lowly. The honour belonged to majesty, but He came riding a donkey, just as Zechariah 9:9 had foretold.
- The scene points forward. The branches sketch the Feast of Tabernacles, whose true celebration still lies ahead.
- The applause faded. The same voices soon shouted for His death — excited feeling is no substitute for faith.
And those going on before and those following cried out, Hosanna! blessed [be] he that comes in [the] Lord's name.
The crowds going before and behind Jesus shout an ancient cry as He rides into Jerusalem. The words are not their own, and the real question is whether the city will stand by what its own lips are saying.
The shout is a plea, not a title. It is built from Hebrew words that ask God to save, though in the Gospels it carries a further sense:
Morrish Bible DictionaryThis word, which is the same in Greek, is thought to be a compound of two Hebrew words, and means "save now," as in Psalm 118:25. In the New Testament the sense appears to be "bestow blessing" — "Bestow blessing on the Son of David: bestow blessing, O You who are in the highest."
The crowd is not inventing words. They reach back to a psalm that looks ahead to a day still to come:
C. E. StuartSo the Psalmist wrote by the spirit of prophecy; it refers to the coming day of Israel's final deliverance. "Hosanna," cried the crowd, as they came down the slopes of Olivet and passed into the city... The One spoken of in the psalm was in their midst. He was the King, the heir to David's throne, under whom it will be re-established.
The praise did not rise by accident. One writer traces the scene back to God's hand on the very people who would soon turn against Him:
J. N. DarbyThe same divine power was controlling the hearts of the disciples and of the crowd, to give this testimony to the royalty of Jesus. Those who went before Him were moved to sing the same testimony of Israel, crying out as in Psalm 118... This was really the full language of waiting for the kingdom, acknowledging the Person of the Messiah, and looking up to heaven as its source. So the full testimony was given to the Son of David, the Lord Jesus. The people had set their wills on rejecting Him, yet that same power overruled their minds to honour Him with the fullest testimony to the claim in which He came for their own blessing.
Their words were true. Their grasp of them was not:
William KellyIt was a strikingly bright testimony to the ways of God. That was true of the ever-adorable One who stooped to offer Himself to the acceptance of His people. It was true as well of the fitting cries of the crowd, little as they realised the truth of their own words, or how grave the situation was for their nation and city from that day to this.
The gap between the shout and the heart showed itself within days. One writer turns that collapse into a warning about the worth of crowd excitement:
William KellyIt is a terrible thing to see how fickle the crowd is. They are just the same to this day... The same crowd that cried, "Hosanna to the Son of David!" and applauded Him to the skies, with one mouth cried, "Crucify him, crucify him!" within a few days... their applause was nothing. Applause is only human feeling stirred up in the moment. That feeling can swing to the exact opposite, and very fast.
The moment was a preview, not the fulfilment. Notice also who does the praising while the nation's leaders hold back:
Hamilton SmithAs the Lord enters Jerusalem, a crowd surrounds Him and praises Him as the King. They quote Psalm 118:25-26: "Save now… Blessed is He who comes in the name of the LORD." Such will be the cry of the nation in a day to come, when a remnant awakened to repentance will look to the LORD for salvation. That time had not yet come. But though the leaders of the nation reject the Lord, the babes and infants may give a testimony to His glory.
One writer presses the same hope further. The city that refused Him has not been written off:
William KellyThe despised Messiah is no longer refused. On the contrary, He is most welcome to their hearts: "Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!"... Jerusalem is not abandoned forever. He left her to herself, to her sin and shame in refusing Him. Yet He Himself is our assurance that the very same people and city will look for Him, welcome Him, and be given their song.
- The cry — "Hosanna" means "save now." It is a plea from Psalm 118:25, not a cheer.
- The source — the crowd quotes a psalm about Israel's final rescue under David's heir.
- The hand — God overruled hearts already set against Him, so His Son received this public witness.
- The gap — they said more than they knew. Days later the same voices called for His death. Excited feeling proves nothing.
- The future — a repentant people will say these words again and mean them, welcoming the King they once refused.
Blessed [be] the coming kingdom of our father David. Hosanna in the highest!
The crowd entering Jerusalem blesses more than the One riding in — it blesses a kingdom, and calls David "our father." Their words were truer than they knew, yet the kingdom did not come, and days later the same city crucified Him.
The word the crowd repeats is not applause. It is a plea taken from Psalm 118.
Morrish Bible DictionaryThis word is the same in Greek. It is thought to come from two Hebrew words, and means "save now," as in Psalm 118:25. In the New Testament the sense appears to be "bestow blessing." "Bestow blessing on the Son of David: bestow blessing, You who are in the highest."
Adding "in the highest" tells you where they thought the help would come from.
J. N. DarbyThis was the full language of waiting for the kingdom. It acknowledged the Person of Messiah. It looked up to heaven as the source of it, saying: "Save now in the highest."
"The kingdom of our father David" was not a vague hope. It carried specific promises.
George DavisonThey had in mind the glowing prophecies. The Son of David would enter Jerusalem and take His throne. His law would go out from Jerusalem. Israel would be free from all their enemies, and God would live among them. Had the leaders accepted Him, all this would have been established. Psalm 72, Isaiah 11, and Zechariah 9 are in view in this title. But as we know, He was rejected, and these blessings for Israel are on hold.
For that crowd the promise felt political and immediate.
Truth & TestimonyExpectation ran high among the people. The time of release had come. Rome's rule would end and Israel would be free.
Mark's line differs from the other Gospel accounts. One writer points out what the shouts here do not say.
Morrish Bible DictionaryThe exclamations here do not speak of Him as king, but of their "father David"... So this Gospel proclaims the Lord's connection with Israel as Son of David. Most of it has followed His work in Galilee of the Gentiles.
Kelly keeps the shorter reading, "Blessed be the coming kingdom of our father David," and explains why a longer wording spread:
William KellyThe common text comes from the usual habit of making this Gospel match the parallel passages in Matthew and Luke.
The crowd's cry was more than a passing mood. Something larger than crowd feeling was at work.
J. N. DarbySo the full testimony was given to the Son of David, the Lord Jesus. The people in their will meant to reject Him. Yet their minds were overruled to honour Him. They gave the fullest testimony to the claim in which He came for their own blessing.
That does not mean the singers understood what they were singing.
William KellyIt was a remarkably bright testimony to the ways of God — not only in the One who offered Himself to His people, but in the fitting cries of the crowd. They little realised the truth of their own words, or how serious the moment was for their nation and city from that day to this. God was moving among them. He would have a testimony, true but despised, to the King, however much He humbled Himself.
The words match a scene still ahead, when Israel will mean them.
Hamilton SmithThis will be the cry of the nation in a day to come. Then a remnant awakened to repentance will look to the LORD for salvation. That time had not yet come.
The speed of the collapse exposes what the enthusiasm was worth.
F. B. HoleBut their cry came from a sudden gust of enthusiasm. It had no lasting significance, as what followed showed. Within a week He was crucified. The Lord knew how worthless their excited cry was. So a little later He said, "You will not see me again, until you say, 'Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord'" (Matthew 23:39).
David's own life shows the pattern: anointing, rejection, then rule.
Frank WallaceDavid, the son of Jesse, knew the joy and dignity of being anointed king of Israel. He also knew the bitterness of rejection by the people he was anointed to govern. That came before he ruled with the power of an undisputed king. His greater Son knew that in a fuller way than David ever did. But in the end, like David, His greater Son will subdue all His enemies and rule the whole earth undisputed.
- The cry — "Hosanna" means "save now." It is a plea from Psalm 118, aimed at heaven, not applause for a celebrity.
- The kingdom — "our father David" carried old promises: a throne in Jerusalem, freedom from enemies, and God living with His people.
- The overruling — the people meant to reject Him. Yet God moved among them, and His Son received full public testimony to His claim.
- The gap — they said true words without grasping them. Their enthusiasm collapsed within a week, and the blessings went on hold.
- The certainty — a repentant remnant will one day mean this welcome, and David's greater Son will reign over the whole earth.