Luke 24:1–42

Luke 24:1 · Darby

But on the morrow of the sabbath, very early indeed in the morning, they came to the tomb, bringing the aromatic spices which they had prepared.

The Sabbath was over, and at first light women were walking back to the grave with burial spices in their hands. Luke opens his resurrection account not with an empty tomb but with real love serving a Man they believed was still dead.

The Sabbath That Stopped Their Work

Their errand had waited a full day. One writer draws out what that pause reveals about the limits of even the finest human love.

The Sabbath day had interrupted the loving labours of the women with their spices. "On the first day of the week, at early dawn," they returned. Love is usually quick-sighted; it might sense coming danger where others were dull; it might have a feeling of death where others saw triumph. But none except God could anticipate the resurrection. Their labour was useless, as far as their own object was concerned, whatever grace might make of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Prepared Spices Reveal

The women prepared the spices before the sabbath, then set them aside while they kept the day of rest. That order tells us three things about them at once.

"Then they returned and prepared spices and ointments. On the Sabbath they rested according to the commandment." This shows three things very clearly. First, their affection for Christ. Second, that they had no expectation of the resurrection. And last, their devout piety, seen in their submission to the word of God. They longed to lavish the marks of their deep love on the dead body of their Lord. But the sabbath followed at once. So these holy women quietly waited and rested in obedience to the commandment before carrying out their plan.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Working for Christ Instead of Trusting Him

Their journey was an act of service for someone they thought needed it. One writer sees in that a mistake we still repeat: we would rather work for Christ than believe He has already done our work for us.

It is much easier for us to do Christ's business than to believe that He has done ours. Not one form of human religion takes up that thought. So it was with the disciples. They could bring their spices and their ointments, but they were not yet able to believe the mighty fact that He had been doing their business... They came as the living to the dead, instead of believing that He, as the living One, has come down to us who were dead. We will spend our days in penances, but we will not trust Him.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

A Delay That Came From God

Their unbelief is part of the evidence for the resurrection. One writer also reads the sabbath pause not as an unfortunate delay but as God's doing, because the errand was never needed.

The closing verses of Luke 23 and the opening part of this chapter make it very plain that none of His disciples expected His resurrection. This makes the testimony to it all the stronger and more satisfying. They were not enthusiastic dreamers, ready to believe anything, but materialistic and downcast, ready to doubt everything. The women come before us first. They had no thoughts except those suitable to an ordinary funeral. Their minds were full of the tomb, His body, and the customary spices and ointments. But the Jewish sabbath came in between and stopped their activities. This was of God, for their activities were wholly unnecessary. By the time they could have taken them up again, they would not have found the sacred body.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Day Itself Matters

Luke marks the day with care. The old day of rest had held the body of Jesus in the tomb. The day that follows marks a new beginning.

Christ lay in the grave that sabbath. But now He is risen — risen on the first day of the week, the firstfruits of those who slept... This is why we do not celebrate the rest of the old creation — we were utterly lost as part of it. We celebrate the resurrection of our blessed Lord instead, as the foundation and beginning of the new, now that redemption is accomplished. So after His resurrection He meets His disciples on that first day of the week when they were together. And on the next first day, the Lord's day, the same thing happens.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Fitting the Four Accounts Together

Matthew, Mark, Luke and John each tell this morning in a different way, and commentators differ on the exact order of events. One writer lines them up like this:

The first text [Matthew 28:1] speaks not of the resurrection day but of the sabbath that came before it — late on that day, at dusk, when the next day was to begin by Jewish reckoning... The Sabbath was past, as we hear in the second [Mark 16:1], and the women named bought the spices to embalm Him. But when they came to the tomb very early next morning, they learnt that the Lord was risen. That is what the third text [Luke 24:1] says. The fourth [John 20:1] tells us of two separate visits of Mary of Magdala.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Love — The spices prove real affection for Christ. Their obedience shows too: they waited out the sabbath first.

- Limit — That same love expected a corpse. Only God could anticipate the resurrection — and because no disciple expected it, their later testimony carries all the more weight.

- Mistake — They came to do something for Christ, rather than believe He had done everything for them.

- Mercy — The interruption was God's, sparing them a service that was never necessary.

- Morning — Their needless errand brings them to the start of a new creation: the old rest is over, and the Lord's day has begun.

Luke 24:2 · Darby

And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre.

The women who set out for the tomb that morning had one plan: to finish the burial. Instead they found the grave already open. Everything turns on two questions: who moved the stone, and what for?

A stone Luke has not mentioned before

Luke never told us that a stone had been set at the tomb. It appears here for the first time, already rolled back:

"The stone rolled away." Luke, in keeping with a peculiarity of his record, has not mentioned this stone before.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Opened for witnesses, not for an escape

So why move the stone at all? One writer says the answer has nothing to do with letting the Lord out:

Coming to the grave, these devoted women find that God had been there before them, and the stone is rolled away. It was not rolled away so that the body of the Lord might leave the grave. It was rolled away so that disciples might enter and see that the place where He had been laid is empty. No stone, however great, could hold the body of the Lord in the grave.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

That means the moment of rising came earlier than the moment of opening, and the state of the tomb shows it:

When Mary Magdalene came to the tomb, an angel had come down from heaven and had already rolled the stone, which was very large, away from its mouth. The Lord was no longer there. He was risen, in divine power, in perfect calmness. All the grave-clothes lay in good order in the tomb... The great stone was no obstacle to the Lord's going out. The divine power that raised Him from the dead, and the spiritual body He then had, made it easy for Him to leave the tomb.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Love that came prepared for the wrong thing

These writers never question the women's love. They question what the women expected. They came ready to care for a body, and the open grave undid the whole errand:

The Sabbath day had interrupted the loving labours of the women with their spices. "On the first day of the week, at early dawn" they returned. Love is usually quick-sighted. It might sense coming danger where others were dull... None but God could anticipate the resurrection. Their labour was useless, as far as their own aim went, whatever grace might make of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Devotion and understanding are two different things. One can run far ahead of the other:

The women, taken up with their own thoughts and affections, come with their spices to anoint the dead body of Jesus. Yet He was already living before God in the fragrance of His work and offering... At first this threw them into an unexpected difficulty: they did not find the Lord's body. Nor did they know He was risen. They did not understand that no judgment and no sin remained. There may be real and great love for Jesus without understanding this.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why an empty grave is so hard to take in

Their slowness was not unusual. One writer traces it to what the resurrection forces a person to face:

But men, and even saints, are slow to appreciate the resurrection. It brings God too near to them. Nothing is more characteristic of Him than raising the dead. Resurrection from among the dead must be learnt from divine teaching, for only He could reveal it in His grace. This breaks in on the whole course of the world. It shows a power above nature, victorious over Satan, which delivers even from divine judgment.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The morning a new order began

The stone moved on a particular day. One writer reads that day as a fresh start, not a repair of the old order:

The sabbath of the old creation passes in gloom and sorrow. Then the first day of the new week comes, and with it the First-born from among the dead. He is the Head of a new creation, living on in the power of His immortal life... The stone is rolled away; the tomb empty!

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Stone. Luke mentions the stone only here, and only once it lies rolled away.

- Sight. It was rolled back not to let the Lord out, but to let others in; no stone could have held Him anyway.

- Silence. He had already risen in calm divine power, and the grave-clothes lay in order. The opening followed the rising; it did not cause it.

- Love. The women's love was real and their spices were ready. But their errand assumed a dead Christ. Great love can exist without understanding.

- Sunrise. The empty tomb on the first day of the week marks a new beginning. The Firstborn from the dead lives in the power of a life that does not end.

Luke 24:3 · Darby

And when they had entered they found not the body of the Lord Jesus.

The women had watched His burial. At first light they came back to finish it, and stepped into a tomb with no one in it. What they did not find became the first evidence of the resurrection. It also shows how much real love for Christ can still miss.

Love at daybreak

They came as early as the sabbath allowed, carrying spices for a corpse. One writer notes how far affection can see, and where it stops:

The sabbath day had interrupted the loving labours of the women with their spices. "On the first day of the week, at early dawn" they returned. Love usually sees quickly. It might sense coming danger where others are dull. It might feel death coming where others saw triumph. Only God could foresee the resurrection. As far as their own aim went, their work was useless — whatever grace might count it worth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Affection without faith

Their errand was warm and wrong at the same time. One writer finds comfort in that mixture, and draws the line the Lord keeps between love and faith:

There is something very comforting in it. It is ignorance and affection mingled. Ignorance took them to look for the living among the dead. Affection took them too, counting the dead body of the Lord worth more than everything around them. What are you to do with ignorant affection? Just what Christ did with it. He could appreciate it, but He was not satisfied with it. He will not have love in the place of faith. Love is the principle that gives; faith is the principle that takes.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

What they missed while He was already risen

The body was missing because Christ had finished His work and stood accepted before God:

The women, taken up with their own thoughts and affections, come with their spices to anoint the dead body of Jesus. But He was already living in the fragrance of His work and offering before God. He had accomplished everything that set man afresh before God the Father, the last Adam in living acceptance. Then an unexpected difficulty met them at first, for they did not find the Lord's body. Neither did they know He was risen. They did not understand that there was neither judgment nor sin remaining. There may be real and great love to Jesus without understanding this.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The opportunity that had passed

Another writer lists everything their love had already done, and then names the one thing it lacked:

In Luke 24:1 we have women who loved the Lord. Surely they loved Him! Had they not watched Him on the cross? Had they not seen that precious body taken down and laid in a tomb? Did they not return to their homes and spend many hours preparing spices to embalm His body? … Why did they return? Was it not to embalm His body? Yes, it was, but it was too late, for verse 3 tells us they "did not find the body of the Lord Jesus." Yes, they were too late. He was risen and alive for evermore. The opportunity to anoint His body had passed. They loved Him, but they had not learned His mind.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What the missing body meant

The missing body raises a question: was the body that rose the same one they had buried?

He bore our sins in His body on the tree, and that body was laid in the grave. It was the same precious body that was raised again, but made alive now by the Spirit. His blood had been poured out for our redemption. Thomas saw the marks, and they convinced him. They declare plainly that it was the very same body: the temple raised from death to die no more.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

For the women standing there, the loss of their errand was the gain of everything:

"Him who lives"! What could that mean to these downcast women? He whom they sought was not there, but was risen! The tomb was empty. The spices and ointments were useless. But if He was alive again, the power of death had been broken — and all that could mean.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Love. These women came first and came early. They counted His dead body worth more than everything around them.

- Lack. Love alone was not enough. Ignorance sent them to look for the living among the dead, and Christ will not have love stand in the place of faith.

- Late. Their spices were useless; the moment had passed. They loved Him, but they had not learned His mind.

- Living. They carried ointment for a corpse. He was already living before God, His work done, with no judgment and no sin left.

- Life. The very body they laid in that grave rose again, so the empty place meant Christ had broken the power of death.

Luke 24:4 · Darby

And it came to pass as they were in perplexity about it, that behold, two men suddenly stood by them in shining raiment.

The women came with spices and found the grave open and empty. Then two men stood beside them — but who were they, how many were there, and why did they come just then?

Love without understanding

The women had come to finish a burial, not to greet a living Lord.

It is ignorance and affection mingled. Ignorance took them to look for the living among the dead. Affection took them too, counting the dead body of the Lord as worth more than everything around them. What are you to do with ignorant affection? Just what Christ did with it. He could appreciate it, but He was not satisfied with it. He will not have love in the place of faith... It is Christ who has visited me in my grave, not I who have visited Him in His grave. He is the living One, I am the dead one.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Perplexity at an empty tomb

Their confusion made sense. Nothing at the tomb added up.

Safe in the tomb the previous evening and guarded by the soldiers, it was there no longer. Was it stolen? Who would steal it? Besides, the linen clothes in which it had been wrapped were there. It is very unlikely that anyone would take the body and leave the shroud. Where were the guards? It seems they had already disappeared, terrified by the appearance of the angel (Matthew 28:4). No human being was around to explain the unexpected event. They were perplexed, and no wonder. Their suspense, however, did not last long. For two men stood by them in dazzling apparel. Perplexity now gave way to fright. With their faces bowed to the ground, they listened to what these heavenly beings said.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Two men, standing

Luke's picture is not Matthew's or Mark's. The number, the human form and the standing posture all fit his own theme.

Matthew has the angel in his majesty, a fitting royal attendant. Mark has a young man in a long white robe. Here we have two men. That suggests both the general theme of the Gospel of the Son of Man, and enough witness to His resurrection. They are not sitting, as the one in Mark is, but they stood by them in dazzling clothing.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One angel or two?

Matthew and Mark mention one figure. Luke and John mention two. Commentators differ on how the accounts fit. Some hold that the appearances happened at separate moments that morning.

Matthew mentions an angel rolling the stone away and sitting on it in view of the guards at the grave (Matt. 28:2-4). Mark speaks of the women seeing a young man sitting in the grave, clothed in a long white garment (Mark 16:5). John speaks of Mary Magdalene seeing two angels in white sitting inside the tomb (John 20:11-12). All four of these must have happened at different times, yet not far apart. It is good to see this abundant angelic testimony to the fact of the resurrection of Christ.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Others point to the different groups of women who came.

Notice that the second group of women spoken of here (compare John) see two angels. An earlier group had seen only one.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The first announcement of the resurrection

Two witnesses to the resurrection reached the women that morning, one after the other.

Instead of the dead body they found two men in dazzling clothing. From their lips they heard that the Lord was now "the living One" and not among the dead. So the first testimony to His resurrection came from the lips of angels. The words He Himself had spoken during His life gave a second testimony. He had predicted His death and His resurrection. When reminded of His words, they remembered them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A correction they needed

The two men brought more than comfort. Their words exposed what the women expected to find.

They were afraid. They were looking for a dead body — a shining stranger might well startle them. The angels had come straight from heaven, the witnesses of the risen and victorious Lord. They had not been thinking of that, so the angels made them afraid... That was a rebuke. Do you like to see love rebuked? It is not pleasant, but it is faithful. They were doing the work of love, but the work of unbelief too.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Perplexed — The women faced an empty tomb. The grave clothes were still lying there. There were no guards and no one to explain it.

- Interrupted — Their suspense was short. Two men in dazzling apparel stood beside them. Their confusion turned to fear, and they bowed to the ground.

- Witnessed — Luke's two men suit his theme of the Son of Man. They also supply enough testimony to the resurrection. Commentators differ on why the accounts vary: different moments, or different groups of women.

- Corrected — Their love was real, but it was looking for a dead body. Christ values affection yet will not accept it in the place of faith, so the angels' word came as a faithful rebuke.

- Remembered — Heaven's messengers gave the first announcement of the resurrection. The Lord's own earlier words gave the second. The women remembered them.

Luke 24:5 · Darby

And as they were filled with fear and bowed their faces to the ground, they said to them, Why seek ye the living one among the dead?

The women came to the tomb with spices, expecting to finish a burial. The body was gone; they bowed to the ground in fear, and two men in shining clothes answered them with a question that named the Lord as the living One.

An errand of love, carried out in unbelief

They came prepared for a funeral, so the shining strangers frightened them. One writer holds both sides together: their love was real, and so was the unbelief under it.

So they bring their spices and ointments to the tomb, and there the angels meet them. They were afraid. They were looking for a dead body — they might well be startled by a glittering stranger. The angels were fresh from heaven, the witnesses of the risen and victorious Lord. They had not been thinking of that, so the angels put them to fear... That was a rebuke. Do you like to see love rebuked? It is not pleasant, but it is faithful. They were about the business of love, but the business of unbelief too. So in everything God is proved right.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

"The living One"

Older translations render the phrase "the living One" — a title for who Jesus now is. Put what the women came to do beside what the angels told them.

The women come before us first. They had no thoughts beyond an ordinary funeral. Their minds were on the tomb, His body, and the usual spices and ointments... Instead of the dead body they found two men in shining clothes. From their lips they heard that the Lord was now "the living One," not among the dead. So the first testimony to His resurrection came from the lips of angels.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why resurrection is so hard to receive

The women were not the only slow ones. One writer finds the trouble in all of us: resurrection brings God too near.

But people, and even believers, are slow to value the resurrection. It brings God too near to them. Nothing marks Him out more than raising the dead. And resurrection from among the dead most of all must be taught by God Himself, since only He could reveal it in His grace. For it breaks into the whole course of the world. It shows a power above nature, victorious over Satan, that delivers even from God's judgment. And here it was the Deliverer Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Words already spoken, and lost

The angels tell them nothing new. They point back to what Jesus had said in Galilee, and one writer traces the sorrow at the tomb to forgotten words.

The day Luke 24 speaks of was the brightest day that had ever dawned on this poor sinful world. And yet... their hearts were the exact opposite of it. They were bowed down and broken in heart. They were disappointed and upset, with everything gone. His cross had killed all their hopes and His grave had buried them... In the eighth verse it says, "And they remembered his words."... their hearts had been leaky vessels for those words. His words had dropped through those poor leaky vessels and were gone. They had forgotten them... And how often it is so with you and me; we have forgotten His words.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Looking for Him in the wrong place

The question outlives that morning. One writer turns it on anyone who ties Christ to what this world can offer.

The angels announce it (v. 4-8). They almost reproach the disciples for being so untrue to their special blessing that they still cling to earthly hopes, when they say, "Why do you seek the living One among the dead?" For us He is not in this world at all. So to expect to find Him here, or to tie Him to earthly hopes, is to seek the living One among the dead.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What the answer opens up

Answer the question, and the spices lose their purpose. Something far larger takes their place.

"The One who lives"! What could that mean to these downcast women? The One they were looking for was not there — He had risen! The tomb was empty and the spices and ointments were useless. But if He was alive again, then death's power was broken, and everything that could mean with it. A living, risen Christ — that is the starting point of real, living Christianity!

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

The women themselves show what that does.

Now see the immediate effect on these very women. We read that "they came and held him by the feet and worshipped Him" (Matt. 28:9). Their perplexity gave place to worship, and their desolate hearts were filled with gladness.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Seeking wrongly. Their love was real, but they came looking for a dead body. Love aimed at the wrong place still needs correcting.

- Seeking forgetfully. Jesus had told them in Galilee what would happen. Their hearts were leaky vessels, and His words had dropped through and gone.

- Seeking Him living. The angels give Him a title, not just a report. He is the living One, and death's power over Him is broken.

- Seeking here. For us He is not in this world at all, so tying Christ to earthly hopes repeats the women's mistake.

- Seeking ends in worship. Once they knew He was alive, confusion turned to worship. A living, risen Christ is where real Christianity starts.

Luke 24:6 · Darby

He is not here, but is risen remember how he spoke to you, being yet in Galilee,

The women came at dawn with spices for a body. Instead they met two men in dazzling clothes, who asked them a question and gave them a command. The message at the empty tomb is not only that Christ is alive. He had said so in advance — and His followers had forgotten.

The Announcement at the Empty Tomb

The angels do not argue for the resurrection. They state it. One writer notes the three witnesses that met the women that morning:

The two angels reminded the women of what Christ had said in Galilee — that on the third day He would rise again. "And they remembered his words" (Luke 24:8). These words came to them at that moment. They confirmed what the open grave proclaimed and what the angels declared: "He is not here, but has risen."

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

The empty tomb made their spices useless, and it told them something far larger:

"The One who lives"! What could that mean to these downcast women? The One they were looking for was not there, but was risen! The tomb was empty; the spices and ointments were useless. But if He were alive again, the power of death had been broken, along with everything that could mean.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

A Rebuke Wrapped in Good News

The angels' opening question is not just information. One writer calls it a rebuke of real love:

They were looking for a dead body — they might well be startled by a shining stranger. The angels were fresh from heaven, the witnesses of the risen and victorious Lord. The women had not been thinking of that, so the angels frightened them. And they said, "Why do you seek the living among the dead? He is not here, but has risen. Remember how He told you, while He was still in Galilee." That was a rebuke. Do you like to see love rebuked? It is not pleasant, but it is faithful. They were busy with the work of love, but with the work of unbelief too.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The same question meets readers today who still fasten their hopes to this world:

For us, He is not in this world at all. To expect to find Him here, or to try to tie Him to earthly hopes, is to seek the living One among the dead.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why Resurrection Is So Slow to Sink In

The slowness was not just theirs. One writer explains why this truth is hard for everyone:

But people, and even saints, are slow to appreciate the resurrection. It brings God too near to them. Nothing is more characteristic of Him than raising the dead. And resurrection from among the dead most of all must be learned by divine teaching, since only He could reveal it in His grace. For this breaks in on the whole course of the world. It displays a power greater than nature, a power victorious over Satan, which delivers even from divine judgment.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Remember How He Told You"

The angels point them back to what they had heard. One writer traces the disciples' confusion to one root:

First of all, it is very serious to think that the words of the Lord Jesus had been forgotten by them. The apostles' state seems to have been the darkest of all in this respect. The confusion of unbelief covered their hearts and minds. The news the women brought back from the tomb had no place with them; it all seemed like "idle tales."

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

The change came at once, and the same words are now in our hands:

"And they remembered His words" — and with that everything was changed for them... It is very good to see how they left the tomb at once when they remembered His words... How it shows us the power of the words of Jesus! Now we have them written, praise the Lord!

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

Galilee — Said Long Before Jerusalem

Galilee matters here. The prediction came long before Jerusalem:

He was risen. But He had said this in advance, while in Galilee, before He even came up to Jerusalem: the Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Luke's account of that morning differs from the others:

In Matthew we have the angel in his majesty, a fitting royal attendant. In Mark we have a young man in a long white robe. Here we have two men. This suggests both the general theme of the Gospel of the Son of Man, and enough witness of His resurrection... The two then remind the women of His words when He was in Galilee. This part is unique to Luke and very instructive.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Forgotten — Their confusion at the tomb had one root: the Lord's own words had slipped out of their hearts.

- Rebuked — The angels' question rebukes real love that was mixed with unbelief. Faithful correction is not always pleasant.

- Reminded — In Galilee, before Jerusalem, He had told them what would happen to the Son of Man.

- Remembered — His words came back to them, everything changed, and they left the tomb at once. Today we hold those same words in writing.

- Risen — The empty grave says death's power is broken. Stop looking for Him among earthly hopes.

Luke 24:7 · Darby

saying, The Son of man must be delivered up into the hands of sinners, and be crucified, and rise the third day.

Inside an empty tomb, two shining messengers give the women no fresh news. They hand back words Jesus had already spoken in Galilee, which raises the sharpest question of the chapter: why did those who loved Him most forget them?

A rebuke inside a comfort

The angels ask a question before they give the news. The women came looking for a dead body, and the answer from heaven corrects them as well as comforts them.

They were afraid. They were looking for a dead body — they might well be startled by a shining stranger. The angels were fresh from heaven, the witnesses of the risen and victorious Lord. They had not been thinking of that, so the angels put them to fear. And they said, "Why do you seek the living among the dead? He is not here, but has risen: remember how He told you, while He was still in Galilee." That was a rebuke. Do you like to see love rebuked? It is not pleasant, but it is faithful. They were about the business of love, but the business of unbelief too.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The "must" behind the cross

The saying carries a word of necessity: the Son of Man must be delivered up. That necessity looks like a contradiction until you ask what it was for.

He was the Deliverer from Satan's power. The disciples were as nothing in the presence of the enemy. That was natural enough. But what shall we say when we hear that the Son of Man will be delivered into the hands of men? Here unbelief is always at fault. It never knows how to put these two things together. It does seem a moral and mental contradiction that the mightiest of deliverers should look like the weakest of all beings, delivered into the hands of men, His own creatures! But so it must be. If a sinner was to be saved for eternity, and if the grace of God was to make a righteous basis for justifying the ungodly, then Jesus, the Son of Man, must be delivered into the hands of man. And then a far fiercer fire must burn — the divine judgment, when God made Him sin for us.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What sinful men did, and what God did

"Sinful men" names the human hands at the cross. What God did there, at the same hour, was something else.

These verses bring two things together so closely that we can hardly separate them. There is the Lord's treatment at the hands of sinful men, and there is His bearing our sins under the hand of a holy and righteous God. Both happened at the same time, when our Lord allowed Himself to be taken by wicked hands and crucified. Yet we must be clear: not one thing that men did to Him had any part in the work of redemption.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The third day, named in advance

The prediction ended with a date. Their failure to remember it was not a lack of information.

But men, and even saints, are slow to appreciate the resurrection. It brings God too near to them. Of all things, none is more characteristic of Him than raising the dead. Above all, resurrection from among the dead has to be learned by divine teaching, since only He could reveal it in His grace. Resurrection breaks in upon the whole course of the world. It displays a power greater than nature, victorious over Satan, and it delivers even from divine judgment. Here it was the Deliverer Himself. He had often told the disciples of it, and He had even named the third day. Yet those who were most faithful did not understand at the time, and so did not remember afterwards — not until the fact had taken place and heavenly messengers recalled His words to them again.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Remembered words move feet

Once His words came back to them, the women did not stay at the tomb. Memory moved their feet.

"And they remembered His words"; and so everything changed for them. They can now put on the garments of praise. It is very blessed to see how they left the tomb at once when they remembered His words… How it shows us the power of the words of Jesus! Now we have them written, praise the Lord! We have them in what is called the "Word of God." We have the very words of Jesus.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

The report they carried, however, landed on ears as slow as their own had been.

The Living One was not with the dead. He was risen, as He said. Joy must have filled their hearts, and have given wings to their feet. But who believed them? The apostles heard the women, but could not credit their report. It was just idle talk.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Word spoken. Jesus had already said it all in Galilee: handed over, crucified, and raised on the third day.

- Word necessary. The "must" comes from grace. For the ungodly to be justified on a righteous basis, the Deliverer had to be delivered up.

- Word precise. Sinful men crucified Him. At the same hour God dealt with our sins. One cross, two very different things.

- Word forgotten. His most devoted followers came looking for a body. Love without faith met a faithful rebuke at the tomb.

- Word remembered. Remembered words emptied the tomb of mourners and sent them out with news. The first hearers called it idle talk.

Luke 24:8 · Darby

And they remembered his words;

At the empty tomb the angels do not argue the resurrection from the evidence. They send the women back to what Jesus had already said in Galilee — and this one short line raises the question of why His closest followers needed the reminder at all.

Words spoken beforehand, forgotten

Jesus had told them all of this Himself, down to the third day. One writer explains why even faithful hearts are slow here:

But men, and even believers, are slow to value the resurrection. It brings God too near to them. Nothing is more characteristic of Him than raising the dead. And resurrection from among the dead must above all be learned by divine teaching, since only He could reveal it in His grace. It breaks in on the whole course of the world. It shows a power above nature, victorious over Satan, that delivers even from divine judgment. Here it was the Deliverer Himself. He had often told the disciples of it; He had even named the third day. Yet those who were most faithful did not understand at the time. And they did not remember afterwards either — not until it had happened, and heavenly messengers brought His words back to them again.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three witnesses that agree

Three things agreed that morning, and each backed the others:

The Galilean women came to the tomb and did not find the body of the Lord Jesus. There they saw two angels. The angels reminded them of what Christ had said in Galilee: that on the third day He would rise again. "And they remembered his words" (Luke 24:8). These words came to them at that moment. They confirmed what the open grave proclaimed and what the angels declared: "He is not here, but has risen."

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

A theme running through Luke

This short line is typical of Luke. One writer traces the same emphasis through the whole Gospel:

"And they remembered his words." This last point always matters greatly to Luke. He stresses the value of every part of God's word, and above all the words of Jesus.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From the tomb to the telling

One writer draws out what memory did to the women that morning — and what it leaves with us:

"And they remembered His words"; and so everything changed for them: they can now put on the garments of praise. It is very blessed to see how they left the tomb at once when they remembered His words... They "returned from the tomb" (v. 9). That is one great change already made. How it shows us the power of the words of Jesus! Now we have them written, praise the Lord! We have them in what is called the "Word of God." We have the very words of Jesus.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

What forgetting costs

The same writer turns the verse around and applies the gloom of that morning to us. Sadness, he argues, often has a traceable cause:

Oh, what a voice all this has for us; for how often do we forget His words and sayings! Is there one here tonight who has forgotten His words? That is why you are sad — full of gloom and hopelessness. You have forgotten the Saviour's words; they have ebbed away out of your hearts. Is it any wonder, then, that your heart is miserable and your soul confused?

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

Storing the word so it can return

Words only come back at the right moment if they went in first. One writer turns that into practical advice for reading:

So if you commit parts of the Bible to memory, you clearly prepare yourself. Help and comfort from the Scriptures will then be there when you most need them. For instance, the verses you read or learned this morning may not have a direct application to you today. Days and weeks may pass; and then in a moment of sharp trial they will come to you, like the arm of a strong man, to lean upon. But they would not come to you like that if you had not previously learned or read them.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Summary

- Spoken — Christ had told them plainly of His death and resurrection, and had even named the third day.

- Forgotten — even the most faithful missed it at the time and forgot it afterwards. It took heavenly messengers to bring His words back.

- Recalled — once His words came back, they matched what the empty grave and the angels both said.

- Changed — the women did not stay at the tomb. They left at once and carried the report to the others.

- Stored — words return in the hour of need only if you read and learn them first. Forget them, and gloom fills the space they leave.

Luke 24:9 · Darby

and, returning from the sepulchre, related all these things to the eleven and to all the rest.

The women who went to the tomb leave it carrying a message. What turned them from the grave, what exactly did they carry, and who was waiting to hear it?

Words Remembered

The angels had just reminded them of the words of Jesus. One commentator ties what they did next to that moment of remembering:

"And they remembered His words"; and so everything was changed for them: they can now put on the garments of praise. It is very blessed to see how they left the tomb at once when they remembered His words. They returned from the tomb. How it shows us the power of the words of Jesus! Now we have them written, praise the Lord! We have them in what is called the "Word of God." We have the very words of Jesus.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

The same writer notes what had gone wrong before that moment — the words had been given, and lost:

Their hearts had been leaky vessels as to those words. His words had dropped through those poor leaky vessels and were gone. They had forgotten them. For the Lord had often spoken of it. There was plenty of testimony that He would be killed by men, by His own people, and raised up again the third day. But they had forgotten it all. And how often it is so with you and me; we have forgotten His words.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

What "All These Things" Contained

The phrase covers more than an empty grave. It holds three kinds of evidence — and it still met unbelief:

The women returned and told all these things to the eleven. That is, they gave them the evidence of the angels, of the Lord's own words, and of their own eyes: the body was not in the tomb. Yet they did not believe. The modern sceptic might call these things "idle tales;" well, that was just how they appeared to the disciples.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Messengers Who Did Not Yet Understand

They carried the news before they had grasped it. One writer draws out how the Lord valued that limited but real devotion:

There was no real faith in the resurrection. But there was enough to fill their hearts and send them to tell the disciples what they had seen and heard. These faithful women, faithful even if ignorant, were not forgotten by the Lord. The service of those whom the Lord sent may have overshadowed them. Yet His ways are grace, and He has kept the memory of them, and of their early seeking of the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Eleven — And All The Rest

Luke names two audiences: the eleven apostles, and a much wider circle. The same writer notes how loosely Luke sums the whole scene up:

Verse 12 is also given as a confirming fact. It comes after the very vague general statement about all the women telling the apostles and all the rest. They were about one hundred and twenty, men and women. These preparatory facts are really almost introductory to the account of the journey to Emmaus.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Luke gives no timetable. He does not say which woman spoke to whom, or when.

First Heralds

One writer looks at the errand the angel gave these women:

It has been observed that women were employed as the first heralds to announce the Lord's resurrection. Granted... We know that the women were commissioned by the angel to advise the eleven of the empty tomb. We know that they discharged their mission faithfully.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Remembered. The angels gave them nothing new — only the words of Jesus they already had and had let slip. Recovered words turned mourners into messengers.

- Returned. The moment His words came back, they stopped lingering at the grave. Faith does not stay where Christ no longer is.

- Reported. They carried three strands of evidence to the eleven: what angels said, what Jesus had said, and what their own eyes saw.

- Refused. The fullest evidence still sounded like idle tales. Unbelief is not cured by more facts.

- Remembered by God. These women were faithful, even though they did not understand. The Lord did not forget them. He kept the record of their early seeking of Him.

Luke 24:10 · Darby

Now it was Mary of Magdala, and Johanna, and Mary the [mother] of James, and the others with them, who told these things to the apostles.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Luke 24:11 · Darby

And their words appeared in their eyes as an idle tale, and they disbelieved them.

The women came back from the tomb with the first news of the resurrection. The men who had walked with Jesus for years dismissed it. Luke records their unbelief without softening it, and that unbelief shows where real faith comes from.

What "an idle tale" Means

The word behind the phrase is blunt, and critics today have their own version of it.

"An idle tale." Writers today use a now familiar word for the women's report: they call it "legend." It is worth noticing that the disciples said it first. They called the report λῆρος, a fable. But those honest men soon had to cross the line, pull down the bridges behind them and burn their boats.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Unbelief about the resurrection did not start with outsiders.

You may think it a strange thing that the testimony of these dear, devoted women was not believed. Make what you like of it, but it was so. In fact, the Spirit of God tells us that people treated their testimony as "idle tales." That testimony was the resurrection of Jesus, the victory of redeeming love, the witness to all that His death accomplished. When it was first announced, even His own people called it an idle tale. Little wonder there is unbelief today.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why They Could Not Take It In

The disciples had already heard the promise from Jesus Himself. Their problem was not a shortage of information.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Underneath the forgetfulness lies something the human heart resists by nature.

Would you call the apostles Corinthians, who used intellectual reasoning to deny the resurrection? Or Sadducees, the corrupt sect that denied the resurrection? I could not say that... How then do you account for their unbelief? Ah, it is hard to believe that God is doing your business in this world. It is much easier for us to do Christ's business than to believe that He has done ours. Not one form of human religion takes up that thought. So it was with the disciples. They could bring their spices and their ointments. But they were not yet able to believe the mighty fact that He had been doing their business... We will spend our days in penances, but we will not trust Him.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Not Forgotten by the Lord

The apostles rejected the message, but the errand was not wasted.

They did not really have faith in the resurrection, but they had enough to fill their hearts and to make them tell the disciples what they had seen and heard. These women were faithful, even if they did not understand. The Lord did not forget them. Even if the service of those whom He sent overshadowed theirs, He, whose ways are grace, has preserved their memorial and their early seeking of the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Unbelief That Argues for the Truth

Their refusal to believe did two things.

But God's wisdom is seen in this. It tested whether the disciples believed Christ's own words, which the angels' report to the women confirmed. Moreover, the cynicism of the disciples is clear proof that they had no thought of inventing a false story of resurrection to deceive the world.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same point cuts against the charge that the first witnesses were gullible.

If they had been credulous, eager to believe any tale they heard, one could understand that their testimony would carry no weight. But when disciples who were slow to believe the astounding news of our Lord's resurrection were convinced of its truth by undeniable evidence, their testimony should not be denied.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Where Faith Rests

Even seeing the empty tomb did not settle them. Something else was missing.

No doubt they were amazed, but they went home. Nothing they did matched the immense fact of the resurrection. Why? Because as yet they did not know the Scripture, that He must rise from the dead. Scripture is now the resting place for faith. No matter what the external evidence, there is no true faith apart from the written word. The disciples had known neither His word nor the written word.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

Luke 24:12 · Darby

But Peter, rising up, ran to the sepulchre, and stooping down he sees the linen clothes lying there alone, and went away home, wondering at what had happened.

The women had come back from the tomb with news the apostles dismissed as nonsense, and only one man moved. Peter had denied his Master days before, yet he got up and ran — and what he found left him puzzled, not believing.

Peter Runs Anyway

Peter had every reason to stay away from that tomb.

He had slept when he ought to have watched and prayed. Then, when the crisis came, he denied his Master — and the denial was all the worse because it came after His solemn warning. But he was not a Judas — very far indeed from it. He loved the Lord, and the Lord Himself knew that he loved Him. So, despite his deep and shameful sin, news he could not explain stirred his heart: the body had disappeared from the tomb. It was Peter's eagerness — burning not less now, but more, from the sense of his recent wrong — that drove him not merely to take a glance, but to go in and look at everything closely.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Luke singles Peter out among the apostles, and one writer sees a reason for it.

Still, Peter was seriously interested, and ran to the grave. It was likely at this time that John also ran there (John 20:3-10), but Luke's interest centres on the grace of God at work in Peter's heart with a view to his restoration.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What The Linen Cloths Proved

Peter saw grave cloths and no body. That combination is itself an argument.

What clear evidence this gives that the body had not been taken away by enemies any more than by friends! Why should either leave the linen wrappings behind? Who but someone rising from sleep would arrange the coverings in this calm and orderly way? It must have been His own doing as He rose from among the dead. He laid aside what did not suit His new condition, and what He no longer needed. Here we may contrast the very different way Lazarus appeared when the Lord raised him. That difference points to the different character of the Resurrection.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer pictures how the scene looked to the eye.

The linen cloths are lying by themselves, and the head cloth is in its place. Everything looks as natural as the bed a man leaves after a night's sleep. It was not as though the clothing had been taken off Him, but as though He had gone out of it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Wonder Is Not Faith

The apostles heard the women's report and stayed where they were.

The women returned and told the eleven apostles all these things. They laid out the evidence of the angels, of the Lord's own words, and of their own eyes: the body was not in the tomb. Yet they did not believe. A modern sceptic might call these things "idle tales"; that is just how they appeared to the disciples. Peter, however, with his usual impulsiveness, went a step further. He ran to the tomb to see for himself, and what he saw confirmed their words so far. Yet in his mind wonder, rather than faith, was stirred.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Peter did reach a conclusion at the tomb. It just did not go deep.

Still, there was no depth in the conviction Peter could not help forming. He returned home, wondering at what had happened. Wonder is in no way the expression of the intelligence that faith gives; it rather implies the clear lack of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sight Without The Word

A deeper problem lay behind the wondering. Their eyes had taken in the evidence, but the word had not yet taken hold of their minds.

They did not know the scriptures which declared that it must be so. Sadly, Jesus did not have their hearts, and the word did not have their understanding. They go to their own homes; they look no further; they are astonished, John at least convinced. Understanding from God did not enlighten them, and love for Christ did not move them: they went to their own homes.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

One Visit Or Two

Luke has Peter alone; John's account has him running with another disciple. Commentators differ on how the two records fit. One takes them as the same run; another reads Luke as a second, later visit.

John 20:5 speaks of Peter's first visit, when "the disciple whom Jesus loved" went with him. Luke is speaking of the second visit, made alone, which came out of the report of the angels' words. On returning from this later visit, Peter met the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace moves first. Peter had denied his Lord, yet he was not a Judas. Love for the Lord got him off the ground and running to the tomb.

- Grace leaves evidence. Cloths left in order and no body point away from any thief: He laid the wrappings aside calmly, as One who no longer needed them.

- Grace outruns understanding. Peter's eyes had the evidence; his heart had no faith. He went home marveling, and wonder is not the intelligence faith gives — it shows its absence.

- Grace waits on the word. They still did not know the Scriptures that said it must happen this way, so they went home.

- Grace finishes what it starts. Luke tells Peter's run because he is tracking God's work in Peter with restoration in view. Returning from that visit, Peter met the Lord.

Luke 24:13 · Darby

And behold, two of them were going on the same day to a village distant sixty stadia from Jerusalem, called Emmaus;

Jesus had risen that morning. Yet two of His followers spent that day walking away from Jerusalem, and Luke names only one of them.

The place and the distance

Luke measures the trip rather than describing the place.

A village about sixty furlongs from Jerusalem — that is, about 7 miles. The two disciples were travelling there on the day of the resurrection, and the Lord made Himself known to them. Some identify it with ruins at Khamaseh, about 8 miles south-west of Jerusalem; others with el Kubeibeh, about 7½ miles north-west. But there is nothing to settle which.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Two of them — and only one name

Luke names Cleopas and leaves his companion unnamed. Guesses about the second traveller run into a detail later in the chapter. When the two get back to Jerusalem, the eleven are already there without them.

It is of no consequence who the unnamed one may have been. They were disciples shaken by the crucifixion of the Messiah. Grace would comfort them, founding their faith on the Word, and giving the saints to see the unseen Jesus — the One they did not know while they looked with natural eyes. Some have supposed that the companion of Cleopas was Nathanael; others have been sure he was Peter. We may rest assured that they were mistaken, and that he could not have been an apostle. When the two returned to Jerusalem, they found "the eleven" among those gathered together (verse 33). The great point is the Lord's grace. He led them out of human thoughts to Himself as the Object of all the Scriptures — the One who first suffers and then enters His glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The direction they walked

They are not walking toward something; they are walking away. One writer reads that departure as a break with more than a city.

Two disciples were travelling to Emmaus (possibly meaning "in earnest longing"), away from Jerusalem and the temple. Luke 24:13 suggests that when they left Jerusalem, they also left the whole man-made Judaic system. God gave that system at first, but it had become a human religion. By rejecting their own Messiah it shut out the very God who had given it. On paper the two disciples were still in Judaism. But when they came back (v. 33), they stood on different ground with the other disciples. The risen Lord taught them, so they might be a testimony to Jews and Gentiles (v. 47).

Modernised from Alfred E. BouterOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Others read the walk as plain discouragement — "not lack of interest, but rather lack of faith," as Samuel Ridout puts it.

What they had been hoping for

Their sadness was real, but it grew out of an expectation the Scriptures had never promised them.

They had very strong expectations centred on the Messiah, and they believed they had found Him in Jesus... They did think that "he was the one to redeem Israel," but to them that meant redeeming them by power from all their national foes, rather than redeeming them to God by His blood. His death had shattered their hopes of this redemption by power and by glory. Their disappointment grew out of hopes they had cherished which the Word of God never supported. They expected the glory without the sufferings.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The root beneath the sadness

Their disappointment had a root, and it went deeper than grief.

They were occupied with their own thoughts about Christ rather than God's thoughts. Their minds were full of human thoughts, so they could not grasp divine thoughts — they were "slow of heart to believe" all that the prophets have spoken. Unbelief was at the back of their disappointment. Unbelief turned their feet away from the Lord's people; unbelief set their tongues reasoning, filled their hearts with sadness, and held their eyes fast closed so that they could not discern the Lord.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The One who follows

The next verses show how the Lord deals with disciples who walk away.

He sends no messenger to call these straying saints back to His presence. When all goes well with His people, angels, apostles, prophets and others may carry out His commands, as we know from many fine scenes recorded in the Word. But is there a wandering sheep — dejected and disappointed? Then look: "JESUS HIMSELF" will draw near to restore... How different, sadly, is the way we often take with one another. Does a brother wander away from us? How quick we are to draw away from him. But on the day the Emmaus disciples drew away, Jesus Himself drew near. What a Saviour! When we were far away He came near, and when we draw away He draws near.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Seven miles. Two disciples walked the seven miles to Emmaus on resurrection day itself, to a village no one can now locate.

- Away. Their backs were to the city. One reading takes that departure as a break with the whole religious system they had grown up in.

- Why. They expected the glory without the sufferings. The Word of God had never promised the hopes they built.

- Beneath it. Unbelief was the root. Their own thoughts about Christ crowded out God's and closed their eyes to Him.

- Who follows. He sends no messenger. When they draw away, Jesus Himself draws near, leading them out of their own thoughts to Himself as the subject of all the Scriptures.

Luke 24:14 · Darby

and they conversed with one another about all these things which had taken place.

Two followers of Jesus leave Jerusalem on the day He rose. All they have just seen — the trial, the cross, the empty tomb — fills their talk. Luke tells us what they were discussing before he tells us who joined them on the road.

The subject of their talk

Luke does not just say they were talking. He tells us what filled their words.

Their hearts were deeply interested in Christ. God has been careful to tell us what they were speaking about. They could think of nothing else, though I do not doubt they were bewildered by what had happened to the One they loved.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

When the Lord later asked what they were talking about, their answer named Him.

When He asked them what they were talking about, they said, "Concerning Jesus of Nazareth." They were disappointed, yet the topic of their conversation was Jesus.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Talk that was also reasoning

Their talk was also reasoning, and it left them sad. Commentators trace both to one root.

They dwelt on their own thoughts about Christ instead of God's thoughts. Their minds were full of human thoughts, so they could not take in God's thoughts. They were "slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken." Unbelief lay behind their disappointment. Unbelief turned their feet away from the Lord's people. Unbelief set their tongues reasoning, filled their hearts with sadness, and held their eyes shut so that they could not recognise the Lord. And what was the unbelieving thought that filled their minds? Simply this: they wanted to bring Christ back into their own circumstances, for glory now, and for ease and blessing on earth.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

How much of this was their own fault? One writer answers carefully.

Their minds were full of the things that had happened. Their intellect was at work, and they reasoned. There seems to be no self-will or stubbornness in the way they acted. But they were very sad at heart, and deeply puzzled.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

A listener they did not expect

While the two talked, someone was hearing every word. One writer links this road to a scene in Malachi.

Malachi 3:16 speaks of those who fear the Lord talking often with one another, while the Lord listens and hears. Later these two could have said how blessed that was, but their blessing was greater. For the Lord came near, talked with them, and walked with them. What joy it must have been to Him to watch these two taken up with Him!

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Wrong direction, right subject

Their feet were carrying them away from the city and the other believers. Their talk was still full of Christ.

Remember, they belonged to the company at Jerusalem, but they were not in their place. They were walking away, as if it was all over and lost. Things had turned out very differently from what they expected, and they were disappointed. Is this not a picture of many today?… Did the Lord forget these two wanderers, as they talked together of all these things that had happened? No. It was while they talked and reasoned like this that Jesus Himself drew near and went with them.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

No messenger, but Himself

The answer to their talk was not a message about the Lord. It was the Lord Himself.

He sends no messenger to call these straying believers back to His presence… But if there is a wandering sheep — downcast and disappointed — look, "JESUS HIMSELF" will draw near to restore… Sadly, the way we often take with one another is very different. Does a fellow believer wander away from us? How quick we are to draw away from him. But on the day these two drew away, Jesus Himself drew near. What a Saviour! When we were far away He came near, and when we draw away He draws near.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The question turned on us

The Lord's first words to them asked what they were discussing. That makes this verse a test of our own talk.

"Slow of heart" and unbelieving — yes, indeed. The glory of that lowly Man as the Christ of God, the subject of all the Scriptures, had not lit up their beings. But they were speaking together of Him… How should we answer the question, "What is this conversation that you are holding with each other?" If our minds and hearts were firmly fixed on our Lord, and on the glories of His person which He has shown us, we would speak less of the failures and divisions among His people, except in secret prayer and confession. We would speak more of Himself and His interests.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Summary

- Subject — Luke records what the two were discussing. It was Christ. Their hearts held on to Him even while they walked away.

- Flaw — the same talk was reasoning. Their own thoughts about Christ crowded out God's thoughts, and left them slow to believe and sad.

- Listener — as in Malachi 3:16, the Lord hears those who speak of Him together. Here He does more. He draws near and walks with them.

- Person — He sends no messenger to fetch the wanderers back. Jesus Himself comes near at the very moment they draw away.

- Test — His question to them is the question to ask of our own talk. Is Christ our subject, or the failures of His people?

Luke 24:15 · Darby

And it came to pass as they conversed and reasoned, that Jesus himself drawing nigh, went with them;

Two disciples are walking away from Jerusalem. They are going over the collapse of everything they had hoped for. Then a stranger falls into step beside them. Who is He, and why does He come this way instead of announcing Himself?

"Jesus Himself"

One writer points to the small word Himself. It keeps coming back through the rest of the chapter.

Now I ask you to notice that little word "himself." I think the great point of Luke 24 is "himself." Soon you will find, "He explained to them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself" (Luke 24:27). A little later we find, "Jesus himself stood among them" (Luke 24:36). And then again, "See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself" (Luke 24:39). The great point is a risen Man, the same Jesus, but risen. That is undoubtedly the point of the evangelist in this chapter.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

He comes in person, not by proxy

He sends no one in His place. He comes Himself, and He comes to people who are walking the wrong way.

No messenger is sent to call these straying saints back to His presence. When all goes well with His people, angels, apostles, prophets and others may carry out His orders. We know this well from many a fine scene recorded in the Word. But is there a wandering sheep — dejected and disappointed? Then look, "JESUS HIMSELF" will draw near to restore. No stranger can share in the work that goes on between a wandering saint and "Jesus Himself." … But on the day the Emmaus saints drew away, Jesus Himself drew near. What a Saviour! When we were far away He came near, and when we draw away He draws near.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Talking and reasoning

They were talking and reasoning as they walked. One writer notes that we are told what filled their minds.

Their hearts were deeply interested in Christ. God has been careful to tell us what they were speaking about. They could think of nothing else, though I have no doubt they were bewildered by what had happened to the One they loved.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Another writer sees their walk as a picture repeated today.

Let us remember that they belonged to the company at Jerusalem, but they were not in their place. They were walking away, as if everything were over and lost. Things turned out very differently from what they expected, and they were deeply disappointed. Is this not a picture of many today? They belong to the church of God, the assembly. They are members of the body of Christ. But as to their position they are so sad, from reasoning about the things that have happened, that although they belong to it — "two of them" — they are walking with their backs to the assembly and their faces towards Emmaus.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

He listens first

He drew near close enough to hear every word.

We have examples in the New Testament of His close acquaintance with the thoughts and conversation of His people. He gave Ananias a commission about Saul of Tarsus. He repeated to doubting Thomas the words Thomas had spoken to his fellow disciples. Both show that our words never escape His ears. And the journey of the two disciples to Emmaus, when He Himself drew near and walked with them, tells us how interested He is in everything that concerns His own — yes, even in their doubts and fears.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The choice of company

He could have gone anywhere that day. He went to two people who had lost heart.

He might have gone to Jerusalem and convinced the leaders of the people that He was indeed the Christ. He might have gone to Pilate and convinced him that he had crucified an innocent Person. But He did neither. There were those two discouraged disciples who had lost their faith. They were turning their backs on the place where He would meet His own. His heart went out in sympathy and pity towards them, so He joins Himself to their company. Are you sad? Are you full of anxiety? The Lord knows that. He wants to make His presence a great reality to you.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Why He walks instead of announcing

He knew everything already. Yet He begins with questions instead of telling them who He is.

He Himself knew all their thoughts and the cause of their trouble. Yet by His questions He draws out what was in their minds. In other words, He led them to empty their hearts before He speaks a single word. He might have said at once, "Here I am, risen from the dead." But He first sought to bring their souls into a right state to grasp the truth of His resurrection.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- He draws near Himself. No messenger, no substitute: as the two walk away, He closes the distance.

- He draws near as the risen Man. Himself is the keyword of the chapter — the same Jesus, now risen, seen and known.

- He draws near listening. Their subject was Him, and He was near enough to hear it — interested even in their doubts and fears.

- He draws near unhurried. He could have gone to Jerusalem or Pilate. He chose two discouraged people going the wrong way.

- He draws near questioning. He lets them empty their hearts first. Then He brings them to where they can grasp the resurrection.

Luke 24:16 · Darby

but their eyes were holden so as not to know him.

Two disciples walk beside the risen Christ and never once know who He is — Luke says their eyes were kept from it. Was that veil God's kindness or their own failure, and what did He give them while it lasted?

A purpose in the delay

Recognition withheld was not recognition denied. One writer explains what was at stake. Knowing Him too soon would have propped up their old hopes.

Now you see the purpose of their eyes being held until this moment. Suppose they had recognised Him, known Him, and accepted Him earlier. That would have confirmed all the Jewish thoughts and hopes that were so alive in their souls. They are to know Him as the One who died, the One who passed through death.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Faith trained instead of sight satisfied

Their eyes stayed shut, so the Lord reached them another way. He opened the Scriptures to them — and that is how believers are meant to live.

The holding of the disciples' eyes was of importance. In the state they were in, to recognise Jesus would have satisfied their own thoughts. Instead the Lord won their hearts with all that God had said of Him, and gave them understanding of the Scriptures. Then, in an act of close friendship that recalled the great truth of His death, He brought His great deliverance to mind. "We walk by faith, not by sight."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the cause

Not everyone traces the blindness to God's plan alone. One writer looks at the two men and finds the fault in them.

It is plain they had failed in faith. The Lord's words were a rebuke; His slowness to give them what they asked was a greater rebuke still.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer traces it to disappointment. They had left the place where they belonged.

They were of the company at Jerusalem, but not in their place. They were walking away, as if everything were over and lost. Things had turned out very differently from what they expected. They were sadly disappointed.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

The One who drew near while they drew away

Whatever held their eyes, it did not hold Him back. They moved away from Him. He moved towards them.

Is there a wandering sheep — dejected and disappointed? Then look: "Jesus Himself" will draw near to restore… But in the day that the Emmaus saints drew away, Jesus Himself drew near. What a Saviour! When we were far away He came near, and when we draw away He draws near.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

He could have proved who He was to the men in power. He went instead to two men who had given up.

He might have gone to Jerusalem and convinced the leaders of the people that He was indeed the Christ. He might have gone to Pilate and convinced him that he had crucified an innocent Person. But He did neither. Instead there were those two disheartened disciples who had lost their faith. They had turned their backs on the place where He would meet His own. His heart went out to them in sympathy and pity.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Unrecognised is not absent

Why could they not tell it was Him? One writer suggests the risen Christ was on ground only faith can reach — and that failing to recognise Him says nothing about whether He is there.

He appears to them, as Mark says, "in another form"… The suggestion is that in resurrection He was not on the same plane as before, but on a higher one, where then and now faith alone can grasp Him… In Matthew He promises, "behold, I am with you always." Is that not an assurance that He is with His people in person, even if our eyes are held so that we do not recognise Him — our blessed, risen Lord?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From held eyes to opened eyes

Their eyes did not stay held. Verse 31 says they were opened. One writer asks what made the difference.

Have you ever noticed that their eyes were "held" in verse 16, and their eyes were "opened" in Luke 24:31? Now, dear friends, why was that? Many things are allowed to come in and hinder the soul… I tell you what will open the eyes — a burning heart. When your affection is right you will very soon see things.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Held. Their eyes were kept shut on purpose, so that they would not take back their old hopes instead of knowing the One who died.

- Drawn near. While they walked away, He walked with them; when we draw away, He draws near.

- Taught. He held back sight and gave them the Scriptures instead — the school of walking by faith, not by sight.

- Present. Recognised or not, He is with His people — the risen Lord on ground that faith alone reaches.

- Opened. The burning heart comes before the open eye — and even now, unrecognised never means absent.

Luke 24:17 · Darby

And he said to them, What discourses are these which pass between you as ye walk, and are downcast?

The risen Jesus catches up with two disciples walking away from Jerusalem. He does not announce Himself. Instead He asks about their conversation and their heavy faces. Why does He ask what He already knows — and why were followers of Christ sad on the very morning of His resurrection?

The picture the words paint

The verse ends with the two travellers halting in the road. That detail links them to the mood of the whole group of disciples that morning.

Here, in Mark, the disciples' unwillingness to believe Mary's testimony is given prominence, and also their unwillingness to believe the two who had travelled that day to Emmaus... The state of the disciples when Mary came to them we also learn only here. "They mourned and wept" (v. 10). This fits perfectly with the behaviour of Cleopas and his companion, who, when a Man they took for a stranger spoke to them, "stood still, looking sad."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Their direction of travel said as much as their faces. They were leaving the very place where the mystery would have been cleared up.

Their backs were toward Jerusalem. They had satisfied themselves that His body was not in the tomb. Their faces were toward Emmaus. It was the third day, and it was all over. No wonder their hearts were sad.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

The root of the sadness

So what lay underneath the sadness?

What was the root of the disappointment of the Emmaus disciples? This — they were occupied with their own thoughts about Christ rather than God's thoughts. Their minds were filled with human thoughts, so they could not grasp divine thoughts. They were "slow of heart to believe" all that the prophets have spoken. Unbelief was behind their disappointment. Unbelief turned their feet away from the Lord's people. Unbelief set their tongues reasoning. It filled their hearts with sadness. It held their eyes shut, so that they could not recognise the Lord.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The problem was not that they had aimed too high in what they hoped from Jesus.

They had decided between themselves that it was no longer any use trying to stand for the One they had followed. Everything had failed. The One they supposed was to redeem Israel had been crucified like the worst of criminals. They thought that was the end, and so they had lost hope. But it was not that they had expected too much of the Lord Jesus — they did not expect enough.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Why He asks a question He can answer

He does not open with proof. He asks a question, and lets them speak first.

Notice the way the Lord deals with these two erring saints. It should be a great help to all who seek to shepherd the Lord's people, and to those who are pastors by a divine gift. He Himself knew all their thoughts and the cause of their trouble. Yet by His questions He draws out what was in their minds. In other words, He led them to empty their hearts before He speaks a single word. He might have said at once, "Here am I, risen from the dead." But first He sought to bring them into a right state of soul, so that they could take in the truth of His resurrection.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Even His follow-up, "What things?", is deliberate.

He replies, "What things?" How skilful His love is in drawing out their hearts! Well He knew, but there is nothing so skilful in this world as love, nothing.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

Drawing near to those who walk away

He meets their sadness in person, not by sending word. And He comes while they are walking the wrong way.

He sends no messenger to call these straying saints back to His presence... Is there a wandering sheep — dejected and disappointed? Look: "JESUS HIMSELF" will draw near to restore... How different, sadly, is the way we often treat one another. Does a brother wander away from us? How quick we are to draw away from him. But on the day the Emmaus saints drew away, Jesus Himself drew near. What a Saviour! When we were far away He came near, and when we draw away He draws near.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Honesty of heart

Their sadness read the events wrongly. Even so, it was honest, and He valued that.

The Lord delights in reality, in truthfulness of heart. These disciples, as they walked, were sad. That sadness was real; it was the feeling that matched their circumstances, as they judged them to be... And Jesus loves that reality. Jesus loves that everything about us should have the stamp of truth in the inward parts. And He joins Himself to these sad ones. He shows them that the things which had happened at Jerusalem, as they were saying, were really for them, and not against them. He makes what was shaking their faith confirm it.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The cure He applies

He meets their sorrow by opening the Scriptures to them.

This use of the Scriptures by our Lord is very significant. The word of God is the truest, deepest, weightiest testimony. That is so even though the risen Jesus Himself was there, the living demonstration of it in person... The word of God — here the Old Testament interpreted by Jesus — is the most valuable means for finding out the mind of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sad — They stood still, looking sad, their backs to Jerusalem. Their faces matched their feet.

- Cause — They held their own thoughts about Christ instead of God's. Unbelief set them reasoning and kept their eyes shut.

- Question — He knew everything already, yet He asked. They emptied their hearts before He spoke a word of truth.

- Nearness — He sent no messenger. On the day they drew away, Jesus Himself drew near.

- Cure — He met honest grief with the Scriptures. They are the surest testimony to the mind of God, even with the risen Christ standing there in person.

Luke 24:18 · Darby

And one [of them], named Cleopas, answering said to him, Thou sojournest alone in Jerusalem, and dost not know what has taken place in it in these days?

On the day Jesus rose, two friends were walking from Jerusalem to Emmaus. They were going over the events that had shattered them. A stranger falls in beside them and asks what they are discussing. Cleopas is amazed. He assumes this man must be the only person in the city who has not heard.

Who Cleopas was

The Gospel names the speaker but tells us little else about him. One reference work gives the bare facts and a possible link to another name:

He was one of the two disciples walking to Emmaus on the day of the resurrection, when the Lord drew near and talked with them. He is thought to be the same person as Cleophas (or Clopas in the Greek), mentioned in John 19:25.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A question shaped by sadness

Before Cleopas spoke, the Lord had asked why the two were downcast. One writer traces both the sadness and the reasoning back to a single root:

He remarked on that sadness as He asked what they had been talking about. Sadly, unbelief was the cause of both. If only they had believed what they had so often heard, they would have escaped all of it — the reasoning, the sadness, and the weary walk.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Why He asked what He knew

Jesus answers Cleopas with two words: "What things?" Yet He knew those things better than anyone alive. Some have taken such questions as proof that He was ignorant of the answers. One writer rejects that, and points to this very exchange:

So Scripture gives no ground at all for the claim that when He "asked for information, it was because He wanted it" — that is, because He did not know. You do not need to study Socrates to know that a question can be put for the sake of the person questioned. Luke 24:18-19 shows it clearly. The Lord's "What things?" did not come from ignorance of His own recent sufferings. He asked only to teach the two disciples.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

He questioned them to open their hearts before He gave them the truth:

He Himself knew all their thoughts and the cause of their trouble. Yet He used His questions to draw out what was in their minds. In other words, He led them to empty their hearts before He speaks a single word. He might have said at once, "Here am I, risen from the dead." But He sought first to bring them into a right state of soul, ready to take in the truth of His resurrection.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What He looks for

What drew Jesus on that road was not how much they understood, but how genuine they were:

The Lord sometimes puts Himself in our company so that we may learn just where we are in the history of our souls. He likes us to be real and genuine... And what does He find here? I have no doubt this was very attractive to His heart: a sad couple who understood little, yet a couple deeply interested in Him and in His things.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The "stranger" who knew it all

Cleopas could not imagine that anyone in the city had missed these events. He was speaking to the one Man who knew them from the inside:

Little did Cleopas know how deeply acquainted this "Stranger" was with these things. What follows shows it. Their hearts burned as the unknown speaker drew them like a magnet to the Scriptures they had overlooked in unbelief.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Where the ESV has "visitor," older translations read "stranger." The word was truer than Cleopas knew:

He truly was a "Stranger in Jerusalem." The city refused her rightful Lord, rejected Him, crucified Him. He, for whom there was no room in the inn, and who had nowhere to lay His head, was pushed aside for Barabbas the robber. For His love He received hatred... Yet He who is a stranger in Jerusalem seeks to be a resident in the hearts of His people.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Where the conversation was heading

Having drawn out their story, Jesus did not settle the matter by simply revealing Himself. He opened the Old Testament instead:

The accuracy and light of the Scriptures showed where men, and even believers, had overlooked much. The Jews had been content with the general testimony to the nation's hopes and the glory of the kingdom. But, as the Lord showed them, they had passed by what was deeper and now most essential — the sufferings of Christ. He drew the evidence from the written Word of the Old Testament, rather than resting on present facts alone or on His own fresh revelations.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Stranger: Cleopas thought this man knew least about the events. He knew them best. He had lived them.

- Sadness: their downcast walk and endless reasoning had one cause. They did not believe what they had already been told.

- Questions: the Lord asked what He already knew. A question can serve the person answering it. He empties the heart before He fills it.

- Honesty: what drew Him was not their understanding but their honesty. They were sad and confused, yet still deeply interested in Him.

- Residence: the One treated as a stranger in His own city asks to be no visitor but a permanent dweller in the heart.

Luke 24:19 · Darby

And he said to them, What things? And they said to him, The things concerning Jesus the Nazaraean, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people;

A stranger joins two travellers on the road to Emmaus and asks what they have been discussing. Their answer sums up all they knew about Jesus — and all they thought they had lost. What they say about Him is true. But it stops far short of the whole truth.

"What things?"

The Lord already knew the whole story. He asked anyway. One writer sees a purpose in that: He wanted them to speak their sorrow out loud before He answered it.

Everyone who seeks to care for the Lord's people, and everyone who is a pastor by a gift from God, should find great help in watching how the Lord dealt with these two straying believers. He knew all their thoughts and the cause of their trouble, yet He used questions to draw out what was in their minds. In other words, He led them to empty their hearts before He spoke a single word. He could have said at once, "Here am I, risen from the dead." But He first wanted to bring their souls into the right state to understand the truth of His resurrection.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Another writer hears love in the same question.

He answers, "What things?" How skilful His love is at drawing out their hearts! He knew well enough, but there is nothing in this world so skilful as love, nothing… Now you can see how much they knew, and what their hearts were tied to concerning His Person.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Mighty in deed and word

Scripture gives a plain test of a true prophet, and Jesus met it in full.

What abundant testimony we have in Scripture that the Christ was the Prophet (see Luke 24:19; John 3:2; 4:19; 6:14; 9:17; 7:40; Acts 2:22; 3:22). Now, a prophet was known by two things — what he said, and what he did. No one ever spoke like Christ. He spoke as one who had authority, and His word was always with power. No one ever did such miracles as He did.

Modernised from Frederick Edward MarshOriginal wording

Before God and all the people

They do not only report what the crowds thought. They add God's own estimate of Him, and then they name who was to blame for His death.

They simply stated the facts about Jesus of Nazareth. He was a prophet mighty in deed and word, not only in the eyes of the people, but "before God" — something no honest mind could fail to see. They also knew that the chief priests and rulers were fully responsible for handing Him over to be condemned, and for crucifying Him. They did not mention Rome or Pilate.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where their faith stopped

Their confession was true. It was also too small to carry them through His death.

To them Jesus of Nazareth was "a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people," and there their faith stopped. They did not yet see in Him the Son of God whom death could not hold. So to them His death was the sad end of His story… Their disappointment grew out of hopes they had cherished that the Word of God never gave them. They expected the glory without the sufferings.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Redemption by power, redemption by blood

They had hoped for rescue by power. He was about to teach them a redemption of another kind.

He drew out their thoughts to lead them into the truth. The sorrows of His rejection seemed to them impossible to explain, and quite against what they expected. He wanted them to see that the Word of God required those very sorrows. Then those sorrows would confirm their faith instead of endangering it. They had looked for redemption by power. Now, in His suffering to the very end, the Just for the unjust, they learn redemption by blood — and not only that, but a new life out of death, and greater than death.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The root beneath the sadness

The problem was not that they had no thoughts about Christ. It was whose thoughts they were.

But what was the root of the disappointment of the Emmaus disciples? This — their minds were full of their own thoughts about Christ instead of God's thoughts… Unbelief turned their feet away from the Lord's people. Unbelief set their tongues reasoning, filled their hearts with sadness, and held their eyes shut, so that they could not recognise the Lord.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — He knew every detail, yet He asked. He wanted them to empty their hearts before He filled them.

- Confession — A prophet was known by what he said and what he did. No one ever matched Him in either.

- Ceiling — Their faith stopped at "prophet". They had not yet seen the Son of God whom death could not hold, so the cross looked to them like the end.

- Correction — They looked for redemption by power. He taught them redemption by blood, the Just for the unjust.

- Cause — Under the sadness lay their own thoughts about Christ in place of God's. That unbelief kept their eyes shut.

Luke 24:20 · Darby

and how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him up to [the] judgment of death and crucified him.

Two followers of Jesus are walking to the village of Emmaus. They are telling a stranger the news from Jerusalem, and this verse is the heart of their report: their own religious leaders had handed Jesus over to be sentenced and killed. Every fact is true. Yet the story has left them heartbroken. What were they missing?

Who Bears the Guilt

The two men name names. They do not blame Rome or its governor. They point to the chief priests and to their own rulers.

They saw how fully the chief priests and rulers were responsible for handing Him over to be condemned, and for crucifying Him. They did not mention either Rome or Pilate.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That does not clear Rome. The word "delivered" means a handover: the leaders passed Jesus on to the civil power. One writer traces the guilt on both sides:

Jesus had to be condemned by man in every role — religious and civil. The Jews, acting in the name of religion, carried the chief guilt. They stirred up the civil authorities and pressed them to give in against their own conscience, as we see in the mock trial before Pilate. So we see He was "despised and rejected by men." Not by one class of men only, but by every class.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Accurate Facts, Absent Faith

They can give a correct account of the trial, the sentence and the cross. What they cannot do is believe it means anything good.

His crucifixion, death and burial fill their whole conversation as they walk along, sad. Their love for Him is strong, and as deep as it is real. But faith is missing, so they are cast down and full of sorrow. Their minds fret and their spirits are wounded by what He suffered at the hands of sinful men.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Words They Had Heard And Lost

Jesus had told them in advance that this would happen. His words had not stayed with them.

Their hearts had been leaky jars for those words. His words had dripped through those poor leaky jars and were gone; they had forgotten them. The Lord had often spoken of it. There was plenty of testimony to the fact that He would be killed by men, by His own people, and raised up again the third day. But they had forgotten it all.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

The same blind spot ran through their reading of the prophets. Some texts they loved. Others they never took in:

They had their favourite texts, and those texts spoke of the great power of the Messiah — power that would crush their enemies and make them the head of the nations. These they read and cherished and loved. But the texts that spoke of His sorrows, how well He knew grief, His humiliation, rejection and death — these they had neither understood nor believed.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Redemption By Power Or By Blood

They had hoped for a rescue by force. The condemnation and the cross taught them a different rescue altogether.

But He drew out their thoughts to lead them into the truth. The sorrows of His rejection seemed impossible to explain, and the opposite of all they expected. He wanted them to see that God's Word itself called for those sorrows, so that the cross would confirm their faith instead of endangering it. They had looked for redemption by power. Now, in His suffering to the uttermost, the Just for the unjust, they learn redemption by blood. And not only this: in Him God shows us a new life out of death, a life greater than death, and makes it ours.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Jesus Himself Draws Near

They are walking away from Jerusalem and away from the other believers.

No messenger is sent to call these straying believers back to His presence. When all goes well with His people, angels, apostles, prophets and others may carry out His orders, as we know well from many a fine scene in the Word. But is there a wandering sheep — downcast and disappointed? Then "JESUS HIMSELF" will draw near to restore… In the day that the Emmaus believers drew away, Jesus Himself drew near. What a Saviour! When we were far away He came near, and when we draw away He draws near.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Delivered. The two blame the chief priests and their own rulers, not Rome or Pilate. The chief guilt lay with those who acted in the name of religion.

- Facts. Their report is accurate. Facts about the cross, held without faith, produced only sadness.

- Forgotten. Jesus had often said He would be killed and raised the third day. Their hearts were leaky jars, and the words ran out.

- Redemption. They expected redemption by power. The cross taught them redemption by blood — the Just for the unjust.

- Drawn near. They walked away from Jerusalem and Jesus Himself walked beside them. When His people draw away, He draws near.

Luke 24:21 · Darby

But *we* had hoped that *he* was [the one] who is about to redeem Israel. But then, besides all these things, it is now, to-day, the third day since these things took place.

Two followers of Jesus walk away from Jerusalem on the third day, and a stranger asks what they are discussing. Their answer holds faith and collapse at once, and everything turns on what "redeem Israel" meant to them and to God.

The Hope That Died at the Cross

They speak in the past tense because a whole picture of the future had just collapsed.

We can hardly imagine the expectations stirred in them by the coming of Israel's Messiah. Visions filled their eyes: freedom from the Roman yoke, a national revival, glory and splendour under David's Son. They expected a large share in it themselves. "We had hoped," they said, "that He was the one to redeem Israel." Now that vision lay shattered. He did not take David's throne and overthrow Caesar. Instead, Caesar's soldiers lifted Him up on a cross, and the whole people fastened Caesar's yoke on their own necks more firmly than ever. They said openly, "We have no king but Caesar." Sick at heart, and unable to solve the riddle of His claims, which they accepted, and of His sudden and dramatic disappearance, Cleopas and his companion were on the point of giving up their discipleship and going home.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Redemption by Power, or Redemption by Death

For them "redeem" meant one thing: rescue by power.

Their thought was the redemption of Israel by power. They had no idea of a new and heavenly life, though of course they had it. Even for the Christ, death had to come in, so that God would be vindicated and man really blessed. Moses and all the prophets had taught this.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Mourning the Very Thing He Had Secured

They blamed the cross for ending redemption. The cross is what secured it.

The blood of His cross made peace in God's mind. To their minds it was still bitter anguish and cruel disappointment. His words had fallen on ears still deaf to the meaning of His death. They did not know the Scripture that He must suffer in this way, so that they, or anyone, might have redemption. On the resurrection day the downcast pair on the way to Emmaus showed the state of them all. They said to Him, "We had hoped that He was the one to redeem Israel." Yet that was the very thing for which He had laid the effective and everlasting basis!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Third Day, Read as Defeat

They felt like orphans, and they read the calendar the same way.

To their own thoughts they were thrown on the world, friendless and fatherless, orphans indeed. The third day had brought them almost nothing of the light of His resurrection morning. They only mention the day to Him as the measure of how far His death had left them deserted. "It is now the third day since these things happened."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Faith Asleep, Not Dead

Their sentence sounds like failure. One writer finds faith and love inside it.

They give their account, showing at once their faith and how their whole souls were taken up with the Lord. It must have refreshed His blessed heart to hear them speak like this. Despite their ignorance and disappointment, and despite the weakness of their faith, love to Him was there. "We had hoped that He was the one to redeem Israel" tells not of a dead hope, but a sleeping one.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Cure for Disappointment

One writer treats Cleopas as a case study for every disappointed believer.

Disappointed people have some little "Israel" of their own that fills their thoughts, just as Cleopas did. If Israel had been redeemed just as Cleopas expected, he would have been overjoyed. It was not so, and he lost his enthusiasm and interest. He had to learn that although Israel stood right at the centre of the bright little picture his imagination had painted, it was not at the centre of God's picture. God's picture is the real one, and its centre is Christ risen from the dead. Jesus joined them, drew out their thoughts and won their confidence. Then He opened up to them not things concerning Israel, but "things concerning HIMSELF." The sure cure for disappointment is to have Christ filling every picture our minds hold — not work, not even Christian work, not fellow believers, nor even the church, not self in any of its many forms, but Christ.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Hope. They believed the right Person but expected the wrong thing: freedom from Rome, David's throne, national glory. The cross flattened all of it.

- Redemption. They wanted Israel freed by power. God's way ran through death, which alone vindicated God and brought man real blessing.

- Irony. They mourned the cross as the end of redemption. It is the everlasting basis on which redemption rests.

- Timing. The third day carried the light of His rising. They read it as the measure of how far His death had left them deserted.

- Cure. Their hope was sleeping, not dead. Jesus woke it by moving the centre of the picture from their small "Israel" to Himself.

Luke 24:22 · Darby

And withal, certain women from amongst us astonished us, having been very early at the sepulchre,

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Luke 24:23 · Darby

and, not having found his body, came, saying that they also had seen a vision of angels, who say that he is living.

Two disciples are walking to Emmaus. They tell a Stranger why they are so sad, and in the middle of their story comes this report from the women: angels had said He was alive. So why did such astonishing news leave them downcast? What would turn a report into faith?

Angels speak first

The women's own errand was stopped before it began. What they met at the tomb instead came in two parts:

The Jewish sabbath came in between and stopped the women's preparations. This was of God, for those preparations were completely unnecessary. By the time the women could take them up again, the sacred body was not to be found. Instead of the dead body they found two men in shining garments. From their lips they heard that the Lord was now "the living One" and not among the dead. So the first testimony to His resurrection came from the lips of angels. A second testimony came from the words He Himself had spoken during His life. He had predicted His death and His resurrection. When reminded of His words, they remembered them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The manner of the message

The angels tell the women He is alive — but they do not arrange a meeting, and their words carry a rebuke:

The announcement comes by angels, and that fact alone gives it an air of distance. The reserve and reproof running through the message make that distance greater. They do not even promise a meeting with Him: He is alive; had He not told them He would rise? Why seek the living One among the dead? The women are confused and terrified; the apostles doubt: these are tales, idle tales, born in the minds of excitable, dreamy women.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Facts accepted, truth missed

The two on the road repeat the women's words correctly. Still they cannot make anything of them:

Comparing the Gospels, we find, first, that the disciples were all in great perplexity. They had no idea of resurrection. John tells us this plainly, and the same thing shows in what the two on the road to Emmaus admit… Some people believed particular details, or facts, but no one understood the great truth.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The value of their slowness

Their slowness to believe has an unexpected benefit. It clears them of the charge that they made the story up:

The apostles would not accept the word of the women about the resurrection of the Lord. The women no doubt repeated what the angels said, that the Lord had declared long before that He would be crucified and rise again the third day. The disciples probably asked, if He were raised, why had no one seen Him alive? But God's wisdom shows here. It was a test of the disciples' faith in Christ's own words, backed up by the angels' report to the women. And the cynicism of the disciples is clear proof that they had no thought of inventing a false story of resurrection to deceive the world.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Steps of evidence, rising to Christ Himself

The women's report is real evidence, but not the last kind. The proofs came in stages, each stronger than the one before:

The empty tomb would have been a precious gift to faith, and it was enough for John (John 20:8). The testimony of the angels would have been stronger testimony. But the crown of all was to see Him, to handle Him, to watch Him eat, to hear Him speak. This was indeed the full fruit.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What finally settled it

When Jesus joins them, He does not offer more proof. He turns them to what was already written:

Jesus hears their sad story from their own lips. He brings out the state of their hearts. Then He opens the Scriptures, instead of just pointing to the facts as evidence. This use of the Scriptures by our Lord is very significant. The word of God is the truest, deepest, weightiest testimony — even when the risen Jesus Himself is there as its living proof in person.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Even their sad report was a first light of faith:

So already, without their knowing it, a resurrection faith was dawning in them. It needed only the confirmation of the Word to set their hearts burning, and to make them ready for the risen Lord to appear to them Himself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Angels first. The first witness to the resurrection came from angels. The second came from words Jesus had already spoken, and they had forgotten them.

- Angels keep their distance. Their message holds back and rebukes. It promises no meeting with Him. It points away from the grave without ending the search.

- Facts without faith. They believed the details but missed the great truth. You can repeat a report word for word and still be in despair.

- Doubt as evidence. Their doubt tested their faith in Christ's own words. It also proves they were not inventing a story to deceive the world.

- From report to Person. The empty tomb was a gift to faith. The angels' word was stronger. But the crown was to see, hear and handle Him — and it was the Scriptures, not the evidence alone, that made their hearts burn.

Luke 24:24 · Darby

And some of those with us went to the sepulchre, and found it so, as the women also had said, but him they saw not.

On the road out of Jerusalem, Cleopas has just told a stranger everything that happened there. Others had checked the tomb and the women were right, yet no one had seen Jesus — so why did an empty grave change nothing in these two men?

The Report Held Up

The women's story was not left as rumour. Others went to the grave and came back saying the same thing. That is where Cleopas's summary ends, and it ends in disappointment.

Cleopas ended his explanation by saying that men who went to the grave had confirmed that the Lord's body was gone. But they had not seen Him. You may wonder why these two left Jerusalem without waiting to see how it all turned out. But discouragement was a strong influence — and too often it still is with us.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What those men found is described more fully elsewhere: no angels, no voices, just an empty tomb and the grave-clothes lying in order.

For themselves apparently satisfied with this negative proof of the resurrection, they return to their own home.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Where The Grief Lay

The closing words of the verse are the point of the whole speech. Everything before them is preparation for one loss.

There was yet more. Some of the disciples went to the tomb as well and found it just as the women had said. Then Cleopas added the words that held the cause of all their grief: "But Him they did not see."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Those closing words carry a lesson beyond that one morning. Signs and messengers, real as they were, could not take the place of Christ Himself.

They had seen the empty tomb. They had listened to the angel. But Jesus they had not seen. As we read in Luke's Gospel, "Him they did not see." Apart from Christ Himself, the great stone rolled away, the empty tomb and the vision of angels only leave us trembling and amazed.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Proof Without Faith

Why did men who saw the tomb with their own eyes just go home? One writer traces it not to weak evidence, but to Scripture they had never taken in.

Peter and John were slow in the same way. The resurrection was plain when they entered the empty tomb. The folded napkin and the careful order of the linen clothes showed that nobody had secretly taken the body of Jesus away. He had risen by His own power. No doubt they were amazed, but they went home. Nothing they did matched the immense fact of the resurrection. Why? Because they still did not know the Scripture, that He must rise from the dead. Scripture is now the resting-place for faith. No matter what the external evidence, there is no true faith apart from the written word.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Unrecognised Listener

The strangest thing here is who was listening. They told the story of a missing Christ to the Christ walking beside them. Mary had made the same mistake at the tomb.

Mary mistook Him for the gardener, and these two take Him for a stranger in Israel. The third day had brought so little of the light of His resurrection morning into their thoughts. They mention the day to Him only as the measure of how deserted His death had left them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Lord's Answer

He listens to the whole account. Then He settles it, not by pointing at the facts, but by turning them to what was already written.

Jesus hears this tale of sorrow from their lips. He brings out the state of their hearts. Then He opens the Scriptures, instead of just appealing to the facts as evidence. This use of the Scriptures by our Lord is very significant. The word of God is the truest, deepest, weightiest testimony — even when the risen Jesus Himself was there as its living demonstration in person.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

He could have given them fresh proof. He chose the written word they already had.

The written Word was enough to have taught them everything that had happened. He first rebuked them for being slow of heart to believe it, and then turned them to it. He would settle their faith on what God had already given. He gave them no fresh revelation. They must stand on the written word of God... What He sought for those two, He still seeks: that souls should take God at His word, and rest on what He has revealed.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Confirmed. Others went to the tomb and found the women's report accurate. The facts were never the problem.

- Missing. Cleopas ends on the loss behind all his grief: the tomb was empty, but they had not seen Jesus.

- Not enough. Without Christ Himself, a rolled-away stone, an empty grave and even angels only leave people amazed and trembling.

- Unread. Peter and John saw the ordered grave-clothes and still went home. They did not yet know the Scripture that He must rise.

- Answered. Jesus filled the gap not with fresh proof but with the written word. That is where faith still rests today.

Luke 24:25 · Darby

And *he* said to them, O senseless and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken!

Two disciples walk away from Jerusalem in gloom. The risen Christ joins them, and they do not recognise Him. His first word is not comfort but rebuke. So why does He blame their hearts and not their circumstances? And what had they failed to believe?

The Diagnosis Behind the Sadness

Their grief looked like a fair response to a crucifixion. The Lord traces it elsewhere.

This unusual Stranger spoke to them tenderly and faithfully, with surprising words: "O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken!" (v.25). Their own lack of faith in the Word of God had led to their discouragement. After all, the Old Testament prophets had given clear witness to the sufferings and death of the Messiah of Israel.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Weight Falls on the Word "All"

They were not unbelievers. They believed part of what the prophets said. That partial faith was the problem.

Such is the real secret of unbelief in believers. They fail because they do not believe all. With only a partial view of divine truth, they easily exaggerate one point or another. And since they do not read Christ throughout Scripture, they tend to dodge the rejection in the world that disciples must accept, or at least go through, if they follow the Master. They will share His glory later on just as surely.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same narrow reading is still possible today.

They had their favourite texts and dwelt on them. They had not taken in all the Scriptures, and had not realised that He was the theme of them all. If we realise that, we shall pay greater attention to the Scriptures. We shall read them more often, and not stay with our favourite texts.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The Part They Had Skipped

Which part of the prophets' witness had they left out?

There was one thing they all seemed to fail to grasp about Christ, and that was the necessity of His sufferings. It was foretold that the Christ was to be the centre of all the coming glory. But it was also foretold — and this is where the difficulty came, a difficulty with thoughtful Jews even today — that "the Christ must suffer." They could believe all those glowing prophecies about Him, the throne, the dominion and the glory. But when it was said He would be wounded for their transgressions and bruised for their iniquities, they seemed unable to connect that with the Messiah, the Christ who is yet to reign so gloriously.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Root of Their Disappointment

Their minds were already full — of the wrong thoughts.

They were occupied with their own thoughts about Christ instead of God's thoughts. With minds full of human thoughts they were unable to grasp divine thoughts — they were "slow of heart to believe" all that the prophets have spoken. Unbelief lay behind their disappointment. Unbelief turned their feet away from the Lord's people. Unbelief set their tongues reasoning, filled their hearts with sadness, and held their eyes shut, so that they could not recognise the Lord.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Rebuke Aimed at Restoring

The rebuke is the first step in a work of restoration.

Finding out what is in our hearts does not restore us, important as that is in the work of restoration. We do need true thoughts of our own hearts, to learn how we wander onto a wrong path. But we must have true thoughts of His heart, so that our feet may be brought back to a right path. This is the way the Lord takes with the two disciples. Having exposed all that was in their hearts, He reveals all that is in His heart. And revealing what is in His heart turns their "slow hearts" into "burning hearts."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

One Person Holds the Whole Book Together

One Person ties the whole Bible together.

The theme here is "Himself," and truly His name runs like a golden thread through every part of God's Word. Oh, dear friends, have your hearts found that out? Christ is the centre of Scripture; He is the centre of all the thoughts and purposes and counsels of God. If you do not have Christ simply before your soul you can never understand the Scriptures.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

The Same Charge Today

The charge gets turned around today.

Sadly, these days a man is counted a fool if he does believe all that the prophets have spoken. In many learned circles — and in not a few religious circles too — the man who says openly, as every true man should, that he believes every line of Holy Scripture with all his heart will almost surely meet a sneer of contempt.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — Their sadness came from unbelief, not from their circumstances. The prophets had spoken of His sufferings long before they happened.

- Partial — The rebuke rests on one word: all. Believers fail by keeping a few favourite texts and skipping the rest.

- Skipped — What they had left out was the suffering Messiah; they held the glory and could not join it to the wounds.

- Heart — The slowness sits in the heart, not just the head. Minds full of their own thoughts about Christ cannot take in God's thoughts.

- Burning — He exposes their hearts in order to reveal His own. The slow heart becomes a burning heart, and the golden thread through all Scripture is Himself.

Luke 24:26 · Darby

Ought not the Christ to have suffered these things and to enter into his glory?

Two followers of Jesus were walking away from Jerusalem to the village of Emmaus, in grief. They were sure the cross had ended everything they hoped for. The risen Lord answers them with a question, not with proof that He is alive. That question turns the cross from an accident into a necessity.

The part of prophecy they had skipped

The disciples knew their Scriptures. Their problem was that they believed only part of them. They welcomed the promises of a reigning Messiah. They had no room for a wounded one.

There was one thing they all seemed to fail to grasp about Christ, and that was the necessity of His sufferings. It was foretold that the Christ was to be the centre of all the coming glory. But it was also foretold — and this is where the difficulty came — that the Christ must suffer. They might believe all those glowing prophecies about Him: the throne, the dominion and the glory. But when the prophets said He was going to be pierced for their transgressions and crushed for their iniquities, they seemed unable to connect that with the Messiah who is yet to reign so gloriously.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why it had to be

The verse turns on one word: necessary. His suffering was not bad luck, and not a plan that went wrong.

In the world as it is, Christ could not help but suffer; and everyone who is perfected shall be as He is. It is morally inevitable. God's own nature makes it so, and the Word requires it as well. It could not be otherwise, God being what He is, and man a sinner held in bondage to the enemy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The shorter route He turned down

A crown was once offered to Him without a cross, and He turned it down.

He has indeed come — but not to claim those rights. Instead He let man have his hour, and let the power of darkness assert itself, so that He might carry out redemption by His death. Satan, who has wickedly seized the crown, even offered it to Him during the temptation in the wilderness. He refused it. He would not take that short and easy way to glory. He chose the hard road that lay through death and resurrection.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Redemption by blood, not by power

Their hope had been a Messiah who would break Rome's grip. What they receive on the road is something larger than what they had wanted.

He drew out their thoughts to lead them into the truth. The sorrows of His rejection seemed impossible to explain, and did not fit what they expected. Yet He led them to see that the divine Word itself required those sorrows... They had looked for redemption by power. Now, in His suffering to the very limit, the Just for the unjust, they learn redemption by blood. And not this only: a new life out of death and above it, given to us in Him, with Satan's power in sin and its consequences defeated for ever.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "His glory" means

He was already glorious long before Bethlehem, so the phrase needs care.

What glory is this? He is Himself the Source and Centre of glory, so nothing could be added to Him. But His death and resurrection brought a whole new order of things into being. He takes His place at the Head of that, in the full power of redemption glory.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

William Kelly draws the same line, and shows why it matters to us.

His glory is the consequence of His sufferings. I am not speaking, of course, of His personal external glory. That is another thing. I speak of the glory He takes as man, for this is what brings us in — although it could not have been, had He not been God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The key to the whole Bible

After the question He opened the Scriptures to them, from Moses onward. The way He did it shows how the whole Bible is put together.

He Himself — all homage to His glorious Person! — is the divine centre of all the things contained in the Scriptures from cover to cover. He is the golden chain that joins every part of the inspired book, from Genesis to Revelation, into one marvellous and magnificent whole.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same order for His people

The pattern He set is not His alone. It runs on into the lives of those who follow Him, with one great difference.

And truly the saints' way to salvation lies along the same road (Rom. 8:17): "provided we suffer with him in order that we may also be glorified with him." There is only this advantage: He went first and beat the road flat. Now we can cross it, though apart from Him it would have been impassable to us.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Must, not might. His suffering was not a plan that failed. God's own nature demanded it, and the Word had said it.

- Refused shortcut. In the wilderness Satan offered Him the crown without a cross. He chose the hard road through death instead.

- Blood, not power. They wanted a Messiah who would break Rome; He gave them redemption by His own blood, the Just for the unjust.

- Glory as man. Nothing could be added to His eternal Person. As man He entered a new place: Head of a new order won by resurrection.

- Same road. Suffering first, then glory: that is the believer's order too. He walked the road ahead of us and made it passable.

Luke 24:27 · Darby

And having begun from Moses and from all the prophets, he interpreted to them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

The two disciples walking to Emmaus had lost hope, because their Messiah had died on a cross. Now the risen Lord walks beside them unrecognised and opens the Old Testament to them — why the Scriptures, and not a sight of His face?

What "Moses and all the Prophets" Covers

The two names are not a short reading list. They are a way of naming the entire Hebrew Bible.

The phrase "Moses and all the Prophets" takes in the whole of the Old Testament. "Beginning with Moses" means the five books of Moses — Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Then come "all the Prophets," and "He interpreted to them in all the Scriptures" — that is, the Old Testament Scriptures — "the things concerning Himself."

Modernised from Robert F KingscoteOriginal wording

That starting point settles a question people still argue over: who wrote those first five books.

He spoke with great care of Daniel as "the prophet" near the close of the Old Testament, and of Moses at the beginning as the writer of the law. He does not simply leave the Jewish view of Moses unchallenged. He affirms it, and He insists on it Himself, again and again, in the plainest terms.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One Subject Running Through Every Book

If Christ runs through the Scriptures from Genesis onwards, He is not one theme among many. He holds the whole book together.

He Himself — all honour to His glorious Person! — is the divine centre of all the things contained in the Scriptures from cover to cover. He is the golden chain. It binds every part of the inspired volume, from Genesis to Revelation, into one marvellous and magnificent whole.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What He showed them reached beyond the passages we call predictions. The same teaching is open to us today.

This would include types (pictures) of Himself, of His sacrifice and of His resurrection glory, as well as direct prophecies. How marvellous this long discourse must have been! Yet it was only for these two, however much we might wish someone had written it down for us. But it is the work of the Holy Spirit today to take the things of Christ and show them to us. So, by diligent faith and submission to Him, we too may learn the same things.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Word Before the Sight

He was alive and walking beside them. He could have settled everything by pointing to the plain facts. He opened the Scriptures instead.

Jesus hears their sad story from their own lips. He brings out the state of their hearts. Then He opens the Scriptures, instead of just pointing to the facts as evidence. This use of the Scriptures by our Lord is very significant. The word of God is the truest, deepest and weightiest testimony — even when the risen Jesus Himself stood there as its living proof in person... From then on it was not a question of a living Messiah on the earth, but of One who had died and risen, now seen by faith in the word of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Notice what He withheld as much as what He gave.

The written Word was enough to have taught them about all that had happened. First He rebuked them for being slow of heart to believe it. Then He turned them back to it. He would settle their faith on what God had already given. He gave them no fresh revelation. They must stand on the written word of God. That done, He made Himself known as risen from the dead... What He sought for those two, He seeks for still, that souls should take God at His word, and rest on what He has revealed. The sooner a soul does that, the sooner it will have peace with God.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Sufferings First, Then Glory

The story He drew out of the Scriptures has two parts in a set order. Human thinking would gladly drop the first.

To reveal the love of His heart He expounds "to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself". And as He expounds He passes before them the touching story of His sufferings and His glories. The disciples, with their poor human thoughts, would have spared Him the sufferings. That would have kept His glories from Him.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

From Themselves to Christ

The change in these two men was a change of subject.

The two disciples had been thinking of the things concerning themselves. The Lord leads them to "the things concerning Himself". Their desire was to bring Christ into their circumstances. He would lead them into His, and have them know Him as the Risen One outside this present evil world.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Anyone who has been moved by good teaching about Christ can guess a little of what that walk was like.

Think what it must have been to hear Him going through the Scriptures from Moses on, and from type, shadow, figure, offering and sacrifice, picking out what told of Himself, and so explaining it that their hearts began to burn. No wonder — the fact was this: they had never met such a Stranger, they had never had such teaching, and never had such company before.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Scope. "Moses and all the Prophets" means the whole Old Testament. Christ started at page one and left nothing out.

- Centre. Across that whole range He is the one subject: the golden chain binding every part of the volume into one.

- Method. He opened the Scriptures instead of simply appearing. He wanted their faith to rest on the written word, not on what they could see.

- Order. What He drew out was sufferings first and glory after — the very sequence their hopes had reversed.

- Result. He turns hearts from their own concerns to Himself, and has them know Him as the Risen One outside this present world.

Luke 24:28 · Darby

And they drew near to the village where they were going, and *he* made as though he would go farther.

The two disciples reach their village at the end of the day. The risen Lord walks with them, still unrecognised. He then acts as if He is travelling on. It looks like a small detail. But everything that follows at Emmaus turns on it.

He never forces His company

He had walked the whole road with them. Even so, He does not invite Himself in. He leaves the next move to them.

How beautiful that touch is. Christ never forces His company on us. He did not force it that day, and He does not do it today. I can tell you exactly how much of Christ you will get. As much as you really want. "He acted as if He were going farther." And now the right state appears. They constrained Him, saying, "Abide with us." Here we see the courtesy that always marked Him. It was one of the perfections of His path as a Man. What right had He to enter that house? He had a right, but He did not assert it. The question was this: did they want Him?

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The courtesy of a stranger

To their eyes He was only a fellow traveller who had fallen in beside them. A stranger has no claim on a home. What we know Him to be decides what He claims.

"He acted as if He were going farther." How perfect that little movement was! What title had He, a Stranger as He seemed to be, to push Himself on them? He had only joined them on the road, with the courtesy of someone travelling the same way. What right had such a person to cross their threshold? If Jesus is only a Stranger in our eyes, He will still walk outside. Until we know Him as the Saviour, the Lover of our souls, He asks for nothing. But when we know Him as the Son of God who has loved us and given Himself for us, then He claims a place in our hearts and our homes. Then He will live with us and eat with us, as it were, uninvited.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Drawing away in order to draw out

The move is deliberate. Having spent the road opening the Scriptures to them, He now puts their new-found affection to the proof.

The Lord had exposed their hearts and revealed His heart, but for what purpose? Clearly to lead them to desire His company above everything else. Now He will test them to see if His purpose has been reached... He had drawn near to win their hearts; He will now draw away to lead out their hearts in longing desire after Him. And they respond beautifully to the Lord's testing. He wants them. He had endured the sufferings of the cross to have them. But He has so dealt with them that at last they want Him.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

He loves to be constrained

Was He unwilling to stay? From the outside the move looks like a refusal. From His heart it is the opposite.

The deepest love was shown in that action of the Blessed One. If you look at it merely from the outside, you would fail to see how blessed it is. But He drew off so that He might draw out. Though He tried to leave them, His heart was toward them... How gladly He goes! That is why He drew off. Blessed be His name forever, He loves to be constrained.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

The strength of the word "constrained"

Their reply in the next verse is no polite offer. The word itself carries weight — and it met no resistance in Him.

He knew the state of their souls, and that there was still more work to be done before they were fully restored. That further work was the revelation of Himself. So when He acted as if He were going farther, it was only to bring out the request He knew would come — that He would stay with them. The word "constrain" is a strong one; its force is that they would take no denial... How much, we might say, they would have lost if they had not constrained Him to enter!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The guests become hosts — and the host, a Guest

Writers connect this scene with the risen Christ standing outside a door and knocking. Once inside, the roles quietly reverse.

The Lord will not force His presence where and when it is not wanted. The heartbroken travellers to Emmaus constrained Him to enter, and He went in to stay with them. In the presence of the risen Jesus everything is changed: He becomes the host and they His guests.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Summary

- He draws near. On the road He exposes their hearts and reveals His own, kindling a desire He means to test.

- He draws back. Reaching the village He acts as though going on — not coldness, but love drawing off to draw out.

- He waits. He never forces His company; we get as much of Christ as we truly want.

- They constrain. Their words take no denial, and He loves to be constrained.

- He enters. Inside, everything changes: the Guest becomes the Host and they His guests.

Luke 24:29 · Darby

And they constrained him, saying, Stay with us, for it is toward evening and the day is declining. And he entered in to stay with them.

The two travellers reach their village, and their companion acts as if He will walk on. Their plea, stay with us, raises two questions: why did He act that way, and why does such a plea please Him so much?

He drew away to draw them out

He had drawn near to them on the road. Commentators see the moment at the door as a test: did they now want His company?

The Lord had exposed their hearts and revealed His heart, but to what end? Clearly to lead them to desire His company above all else. Now He will test them to see if the "end of the Lord" is reached... He had drawn near to win their hearts, He will now draw away to lead out their hearts in longing desire after Him. And very blessedly they respond to the testing of the Lord... He wants them. He endured the sufferings of the cross to have them. But He has so dealt with them that at last they want Him.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The strength of the word "constrained"

The ESV says the disciples "urged him strongly" and asked Him to "stay." Older translations say they "constrained" Him and asked Him to "abide."

Only twice is the word here translated "constrained" found in the New Testament. The other place uses it in exactly the same way. Lydia "constrained" Paul and Silas to stay with her (Acts 16:15). In the same way the two disciples "constrained" our blessed Lord, saying, "Abide with us." It is a strong word. In classical Greek it can even mean doing violence to someone. In the passages referred to, it means constraining in the sense of taking no denial. How such a constraint must have delighted the Lord's heart! With what joy He would answer a plea pressed like that!

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

He never forces His company

He does not force His way in. One writer notes that the pressure runs both ways between Christ and His people.

He will never compel me to have His company. I do not deny what I may call the compulsion of grace upon the sinner. But with a believer He does not act like that. Do you and I covet His company? "He made as though He would have gone further"... There is such a thing as the love of Christ constraining us. But here it was the love of saints constraining Him. It is reciprocal constraint.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

He did not turn the day back

They asked because the light was fading. Notice what He did not do about it.

It was not that He revived the day. He did not turn the shadow back on the sundial, not even by one degree. He did not command the sun to stand still. The day still declined. But they had found One who could comfort them among the shadows. So when they reached the point where their ways seemed to divide — for He made as if He would go further — they could not part with Him. They had to keep Him as their comfort in the darkness of the night.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

That plea, in its older wording, has travelled far beyond Emmaus:

Luke 24:29. — "Stay." The Authorized Version has "abide," which inspired Lyte's well-known hymn, "Abide with me."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What happened when He came in

One writer applies the scene to our own homes.

We get as much of the Lord's company as we desire, and if He is to stay with us we must constrain Him. These two disciples constrained Him and He entered their house and stayed with them. First He put them right about Himself, individually, and then He took His place in their home: He was Lord there. It is the only place He can take... They supposed that He was their guest, but in fact they were His guests.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

The same words on our lips

The verse is read as a pattern for believers whose own day is running out.

The disciples on their way to Emmaus asked the Lord: "Stay with us, for it is toward evening and the day is now far spent"... Look at the state of His testimony on earth. Don't we have to say, "it is toward evening" and the day of grace is "far spent"? Is there not the same desire in our hearts, to ask: "Lord, abide with us, be near to us"? This verse shows that the attitude of a broken heart has the assurance of His nearness.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Summary

- He withdraws. The move to go further was not indifference but testing — He drew away to draw out their desire for Him.

- They constrain. The word means taking no denial; the only other time it appears, Lydia used the same pressure on Paul and Silas.

- He never forces. He never compels a believer to keep Him, and we get as much of His company as we desire.

- He abides. He did not turn the day back or stop the sun; He became their comfort inside the darkness that stayed.

- He reigns. Invited in as a guest, He took the place of Lord in the house — the pattern for any home that gives Him first place.

Luke 24:30 · Darby

And it came to pass as he was at table with them, having taken the bread, he blessed, and having broken it, gave it to them.

Two grieving disciples had asked a stranger to stay the night. At the table He reversed the roles and served them Himself. Two questions follow: what did this simple act mean, and why did they know Him at that exact moment?

The guest becomes the host

The house was theirs. But the moment He handled the bread, the evening changed hands.

Here of course He takes His true place. He must be the master of the house. He is not the guest now. All is His. And sitting at the table, what does He do? "He took bread, and blessed it, and broke it, and gave it to them." At once there is a recognition of Himself, and of His authority.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The act carried a claim no ordinary visitor could make.

Sitting down to a meal with them, the Lord took the place of the host without warning. He took bread, blessed it by giving thanks, broke it, and gave it to these two disciples. Only the Son of God would have the right to do this in the home of another.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What "blessed" means

The word "blessed" can sound mysterious, as if He worked something on the bread itself. Older translations read "blessed it," while the ESV has simply "he took the bread and blessed." One writer keeps the sense plain.

The Jews already practised the breaking of bread. They broke bread with those who were grieving (Jeremiah 16:7). The Lord took up this custom for the breaking of bread. "He took bread, and blessed it" (Luke 24:30) means He gave thanks to God, no more.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The setting is worth noticing too.

At the evening meal in Emmaus, He "took bread, and blessed" (Luke 24:30). This time the meal was private, not public. It was in the house, not on the hillside. Probably only two people were there with the Lord, not a great crowd. The risen Lord gave thanks at a little cottage meal!

Modernised from AnonymousOriginal wording

Not the Lord's Supper — but the sign of His death

Was this the Lord's Supper? Commentators say no — but the act was chosen with purpose.

This was not the Lord's Supper. But Jesus deliberately used that act of breaking the bread, the act the Lord's Supper keeps setting before us. In it, as we know, bread is broken — the sign of His death. So Jesus, there with them Himself, was pleased to let the truth of His death flash upon the two souls at Emmaus. They came to know Him in the breaking of bread — in that most simple but striking action which symbolises His death.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why recognition came at that moment, and not before

Teaching alone had not opened their eyes. Recognition came through an act tied to His death.

We are to feed on Christ — not only as a living Messiah, and not only as the One alive again for ever in resurrection. We must feed on Him as the One who died, His body broken and His blood shed in atonement. This is how the Lord was known to the disciples at Emmaus, though it was not the Lord's Supper... But what actually revealed Him was the moving fact of His being personally with them in the breaking of bread. It was Himself who broke the bread. There could be no mistake.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same act pointed forward as well as back — it cut them loose from the old way of knowing Him.

By making Himself known in the meaningful act of "breaking bread," the Lord showed plainly that His death had cut them off from every connection with Him "after the flesh." At the same time it drew their hearts after Him as the One "risen out of death."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Lord at your table

This scene reaches any home that welcomes Him.

They supposed that He was their guest, but as a matter of fact they were His guests. He took bread, and blessed it and handed it to them. There was in that village of Emmaus one home at least that recognised Him as Lord. We may only have a small cottage, perhaps only one room. But what a wonderful thing to be able to say: "Within the four walls of this room the Lord has His true place."

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

And what happened over a plain supper can happen again in unremarkable moments.

Wherever the heart is made ready by faith in the word of God and submission to it, the Lord will bring His past grace back to us. He does this in many a simple act — not necessarily in the "breaking of bread," but in countless little ways. Then the heart may not only burn; there is a flash of recognition of Himself, and the soul is restored to the enjoyment it knew before.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Invited — They thought they had welcomed a guest into their home; in fact they were His guests.

- Enthroned — At the table He took the host's place, an authority the writers say belongs to the Son of God alone.

- Blessed — The word means simply that He gave thanks to God, and He did it at a small private meal, not a public one.

- Broken — Not the Lord's Supper, but the same telling act: bread broken as the sign of His death.

- Revealed — Recognition came through that sign. He is known as the One who died and rose again, not as they had known Him before.

Luke 24:31 · Darby

And their eyes were opened, and they recognised him. And he disappeared from them.

Two travellers walked the road to Emmaus beside a companion they could not place. They knew Him at last over a meal — so why did their eyes open just then, and why did He go the instant they saw Him?

Known in the sign of His death

They knew Him over a broken loaf. Kelly ties that detail to the one sure way of knowing Jesus.

There is only one way of knowing Jesus that can be trusted… So our Lord breaks bread with the disciples. This was not the Lord's Supper. But Jesus used that act of breaking bread with meaning, the same act the Lord's Supper keeps setting before us. In it bread is broken, and that is the sign of His death… He had blessed the bread, broken it, and was handing it to them. Just then their eyes were opened, and they recognised their risen Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Darby takes it further. What they needed was not His presence in the body, but His death.

It was no longer just a question of His bodily presence as the One who had come in flesh. Redemption was necessary, and so was faith in it. We are to feed on Christ not only as a living Messiah, and not only as the One who is alive again for evermore in resurrection. We must also feed on Him as the One who died, His body broken and His blood shed in atonement… He was gone in a moment — "vanished from their sight." But He gained what He came for. They had life through His death.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The guest becomes the host

They had invited Him in as a stranger. At the table the roles reverse. He takes the host's place, and their eyes open.

But if He stoops to sit at a meal with His own people, He must always take the first place. He must be supreme in every circle He enters. Let us remember this when we want His presence. So HE took the bread, and blessed and broke it and gave it to them… This simple act of our blessed Lord opened their eyes. They knew Him, and He vanished from their sight… But why did He leave so quickly? His work was done. He had found His wandering sheep, and He had restored their souls.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why He went at the very moment they saw Him

He goes the very moment they know Him. Hole finds the reason in another meeting that same day.

But why did He withdraw from their sight just as they had recognized Him? For the same reason, no doubt, that He had told Mary not to touch Him earlier that same day (see John 20:17). He wanted to show them from the start that resurrection had brought Him into new conditions. So their dealings with Him had to rest on a new basis.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Seeing Him with their own eyes had not made them know Him. Losing sight of Him did.

Under His teaching they had just seen that He Himself was the theme of all Scripture. Yet even while they listened, and their hearts burned as they did, they only saw Him with their natural eyes. They did not know Him. Now He vanishes from sight, and they do know Him by faith. What an exchange!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The written word first

Before He revealed Himself, He had spent the road turning them back to the Scriptures. Stuart notes what He did not do.

The written Word was enough to have taught them all that had happened. He first rebuked them for being slow of heart to believe it, and then turned them to it. He would settle their faith on what God had already given. He gave them no fresh revelation. They had to stand on the written word of God. That done, He made Himself known as risen from the dead. His work with them was finished. He vanished from their sight.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Out of their circumstances into His

Hamilton Smith reads the shortness of the visit as purpose, not loss.

So at last the Lord does come into their circumstances for a brief moment. But He comes only to lead them out of their circumstances into His own. Having made Himself known, He vanishes from their sight… But how did they know Him? Not as in the days before the cross, in their circumstances, but as the One who was dead but is alive for evermore.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The effect was immediate. Despite the miles already walked and the coming night, they turned around.

They at once retrace their steps in their earnest desire to join the little company of the Lord's people gathered together at Jerusalem. And having reached their own company they find, to their great delight, that they are in the company of the Risen Lord, and in His company there is no room for dissatisfied or disappointed hearts.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Word first. He gave them no new revelation on the road. He settled their faith on what God had already written, and then made Himself known.

- Sign second. Their eyes open over broken bread, the sign of His death. This was not the Lord's Supper, but the act carried the same meaning.

- Place third. The invited guest takes the first place at the table. They know Him once He is supreme in the room.

- Sight withdrawn. He disappears to teach them the new ground of resurrection. From now on they hold Him by faith, not by sight.

- Circle exchanged. He steps into their world for one moment, only to lead them out of it into His.

Luke 24:32 · Darby

And they said to one another, Was not our heart burning in us as he spoke to us on the way, [and] as he opened the scriptures to us?

Two disciples left Jerusalem in disappointment, and a stranger walked with them, opened the Scriptures, then vanished the moment they knew Him. Only afterwards did they name what had been happening inside them, and their question still asks what makes a heart burn.

What lit the fire

The verse names two things: His talking, and His opening of the Scriptures. One writer looks behind both, to the Person doing them.

Now, I do not think we ought to play down that burning heart. I am always afraid of that. We ought not to make little of it, and yet we ought not to make everything of it. What was it that made their heart burn while He talked with them and while He opened the Scriptures to them? Was it not Himself? Do not tell me that anything He does is small or trifling. It was He who did it. It was He who lit that fire, He who kindled that flame. It was His love that struck, as it were, the match in their souls.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

Slow hearts made burning hearts

Earlier on the road He had called them slow of heart. The change between that word and this one is the measure of what He did.

He does not stop there. Discovering what is in our hearts matters greatly in the work of restoration, but it is not enough to restore us. We do need true thoughts about our own hearts, so we can learn how we wander into a wrong path. But only true thoughts of His heart will bring our feet back to a right path. This is the way the Lord takes with the two disciples. Having exposed everything that was in their hearts, He reveals everything that is in His heart. And revealing what is in His heart turns their "slow hearts" into "burning hearts" (25, 32). He sets their hearts ablaze with love to Himself by revealing the love that is in His heart.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Opened Scriptures, not favourite verses

What He opened was not a selection. It was all of it, and He was its subject.

They had their favourite texts and had dwelt on them. They had not taken in all the Scriptures, and had not realised that He was the theme of the Scriptures. If we realise that, we shall pay greater attention to them. We shall read them more often and not live on our favourite texts. As He talked with them, His words gladdened and warmed them, although they did not know who He was. He was talking about the right Person, and they loved Him. Their hearts were moved as He opened the Scriptures to them. So although they did not know Him, He took His right place in their thoughts.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Two openings, and the part only He can do

Later in the same chapter He opens something else. Only He can give that second opening.

We shall make little progress in divine understanding unless we take time to meditate. The apostle can set certain truths before us, but he cannot give us understanding. This the Lord alone can do. So we read that the Lord did not only open the Scriptures to the disciples. He also opened their minds to understand the Scriptures (Luke 24:27, 32, 45).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A test to apply to yourself

One writer turns the disciples' question into a question for the reader, and does not soften it.

It is a wonderful thing when God opens up the Scriptures, because ministry that presents Christ this way always makes the heart burn. If the Spirit of God comes and ministers Christ in His love, grace, beauty, and glory to your soul, you may depend on it, your heart will respond. And if it does not respond, you may well question whether you are a child of God at all… Do you say, "You will set many of our hearts shaking"? Well, if they shake first and burn after, it will be all right. And if they never burn, there is something wrong somewhere.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Where a burning heart goes

They had finished their day's journey. Their burning hearts sent them straight back out.

They had enjoyed sweet conversation with Him, their hearts burning within them while He talked with them on the road, and while He opened up the Scriptures to them. They must return at once, and let those at Jerusalem who had been mourning and weeping (Mark 16:10) know what they had to tell. Spiritual joy is unselfish. There is the desire that others should share in it. Those sixty furlongs — about eight miles — no doubt seemed like nothing as they walked, intent on rejoining the company in the upper room.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Kindled — no subject and no conversation lit that fire. Christ Himself did, and His love struck the match.

- Melted — He exposed their slow hearts, then revealed His own. His heart is what turned slow into burning.

- Opened — He gave them all the Scriptures with Himself as the theme, curing them of living on a few favourite texts.

- Understood — He opens the Scriptures, and He opens the mind. Teaching can set truth before us; only He makes us see it.

- Sent — a burning heart cannot sit still or keep the joy; it walks the eight miles back to tell the others.

Luke 24:33 · Darby

And rising up the same hour, they returned to Jerusalem. And they found the eleven, and those with them, gathered together,

The two travellers had just recognised their guest in the breaking of bread, and He had vanished. They turn around, walk the same road back, and find a company already gathered in Jerusalem.

That Same Hour

They had told Him the day was nearly over. Now, tired as they are, they take the same seven-mile road again.

They realised they should be back with the other disciples. They spoke to each other of how their hearts burned within them while He had spoken to them, opening up the Scriptures. Though they had said the day was far spent when they arrived home, they had no hesitation about returning that seven miles or more back to Jerusalem. What a change in their attitude! They likely walked back faster than they had walked home, however tired they had felt before. The reality of Christ's resurrection makes the company of His saints attractive indeed, and their strength came back.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Joy That Cannot Sit Still

Their first thought is not their own rest. It is the people in Jerusalem who were still mourning.

They had enjoyed sweet conversation with Him. Their hearts burned within them while He talked with them on the road, and while He opened up the Scriptures to them. They must return at once, and let those at Jerusalem who had been mourning and weeping know what they had to tell them. Spiritual joy is unselfish. There is the desire that others should share in it. Those miles no doubt seemed as nothing as they went along, intent on rejoining the company in the upper room. When they reached it, they found the eleven gathered together — Thomas was not there (John 20:24) — and others with them.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Turned Back Toward the Gathered Company

One writer takes their walk to Emmaus as a picture of believers today: part of the company at Jerusalem, yet walking away from it.

Let us remember they were of the company at Jerusalem, but not in their place. They were walking away, as if all were over and lost. Things turned out very differently from what they had expected. They were sadly disappointed… But what a change when their eyes were opened and they knew Him! They rose that same hour and returned to Jerusalem. What a picture! While our souls are in that condition, not knowing the Lord among the gathered believers, our backs are sure to be turned to Jerusalem. And the moment we truly know Him, our face turns at once toward the gathered company.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Another writer draws out why the Lord walked all that way with them only to disappear at the table.

He goes with them to the end, and then He shows them that He has no business at Emmaus… Was it the Spirit that was leading these two toward Emmaus? No, for the Spirit had been leading others to gather together in Jerusalem… So they return to Jerusalem, despite the distance and their tiredness. There they find the disciples gathered together! Was it a matter of indifference to Him whether or not these two were going to Emmaus? Was He concerned only about the number gathered in the little room? Oh, no. He does not reveal Himself among them until these two are brought back to Jerusalem, to those already gathered there.

Modernised from William J LoweOriginal wording

The Eleven — And Those With Them

Luke names who was in the room. That detail shapes who heard what the Lord said next.

It was not only the eleven who were there when the Lord came into their midst; so it was not an apostolic company. It is good to remember this, and Scripture is very clear about it. "And they rose that same hour and returned to Jerusalem. And they found the eleven and those who were with them gathered together." The apostles were there. But the brothers were there too, and the sisters as well, I judge. The two from Emmaus joined them, and then the Lord comes to the assembled company and tells them His mind.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

News Met by News

They arrive carrying a story to tell. Before they can tell it, the room tells them the same thing about Simon.

They go to tell their news. As they get in at the door, their own faith gets a beautiful confirmation, because someone at once exclaims, "The Lord has risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!" God always confirms the soul that receives and answers to the truth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What They Found in the Room

Two sets of full hearts meet — and the next thing recorded is that He stands among them.

They had come with overflowing hearts, longing to tell what they had heard and seen, but they found those gathered together with overflowing hearts also, testifying to the resurrection of their Lord. So we are not surprised to read that, as they were speaking, Jesus Himself stood among them and said, "Peace to you." We say we are not surprised, because hearts filled to overflowing with Himself will always command His presence… Whenever we speak to one another of Christ, He will always be one of the company.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Recognition. Knowing the risen Christ did not keep them at the table. The same hour they got up and walked the whole road back.

- Restoration. They belonged to the company but were out of their place. The moment they knew Him, they turned back toward the gathered disciples.

- Unselfish joy. They set out again at once because others in Jerusalem were still weeping and had not yet heard.

- Wider company. "Those who were with them" means the company that evening was not made up of apostles only.

- News confirmed. Before they could speak, the room told them the Lord had risen indeed and had appeared to Simon.

Luke 24:34 · Darby

saying, The Lord is indeed risen and has appeared to Simon.

The two disciples back from Emmaus burst in with news they could hardly hold in — and found the same news already on the lips of the group inside. Their greeting holds two things: death defeated, and a name no one expected to hear.

Faith Confirmed at the Door

One writer notices what happens to the messengers at that door:

They go to tell their news. As they get in at the door, they find their own faith confirmed in the most beautiful way. Someone at once exclaims, "The Lord has risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!" God always confirms the soul that receives and answers to the truth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What "Risen Indeed" Carries

Those two words carry far more than a report that a body moved:

"The Lord has risen indeed" (Luke 24:34). But how much that means! It is God's seal on every word He had spoken and everything He had done during His life. It was also the complete reversal of the world's judgment, both civil and religious. That world had rejected Him and thrown Him out as a criminal and a blasphemer. More than that, it was God declaring that He accepted the sacrifice for sin our Lord had offered on the cross. It also declared that death had no power over Him. It declared that Satan's power was crushed forever, and that God's Holy One could not see corruption (Acts 2:27, 31). "Christ, being raised from the dead, will never die again" (Rom. 6:9).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Name Nobody Expected

Simon Peter had denied knowing Jesus. The risen Lord goes to him first:

The servant who denied the Lord will have a private meeting with the Lord he denied. For we read, "The Lord has risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!" How wonderful this grace is. We would have thought He would appear to the disciple Jesus loved, or to the devoted woman who anointed His feet. But grace takes a more wonderful way and appears first to the disciple who had denied Him.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why It Reassured the Whole Room

The news was not only Peter's comfort. Every man in that room had run away too:

They were faithless men; they had abandoned Him and fled at the first blast of the storm. Might He not cast them off and choose others who would not fail Him? That would have been their natural thought, but He had appeared to Simon. Simon who had denied Him three times, and who had cursed and sworn about it. The man whose sin was the worst was the first to be sought out by the Lord. "The Lord has risen indeed" declared that He was greater than the greatest enemy outside them; "and has appeared to Simon" declared that His grace was more than equal to the greatest failure within them.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

A Meeting With No Transcript

Scripture reports the meeting but says nothing of what was said there:

What was personally between Himself and Peter, He dealt with personally on the day of His resurrection. On that day we are told, "The Lord has risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!" (Luke 24:34). No one else heard a word of this meeting. Yet the Lord also spoke to Peter in front of the disciples. They were involved in the matter to some degree, and His words were meant to re-establish confidence among them (John 21:15-22).

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

One writer notes what that meeting did for Peter:

We are not told what took place at that meeting; it probably could not be told. It is enough for us to know that the Lord appeared to Simon. At that meeting He restored and strengthened his faith, and set his heart completely at rest. So he was able to join his brothers that evening, when the Lord stood among them.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Peter Before the Twelve

Another writer weighs the order of the appearances — one man first, then the group of twelve disciples:

The risen Lord appeared to Cephas — that is, Simon Peter — before He stood among "the twelve." No one could matter more than Simon at that moment, when his soul needed reassurance so deeply. But no single man could carry the weight of the whole company who knew him best. So the twelve are named next.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Belief Still Lagging

One writer looks at how the group actually received the news:

During that day the Lord appeared to Simon Peter, and also to the disciples travelling to Emmaus. When these two got back that night, they found the disciples occupied with the Lord's appearing to Peter. But there was much unbelief in their minds, though such a testimony seems to have had a strong influence on them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Risen — the resurrection is God's seal on everything Jesus said and did. It overturns the world's verdict against Him.

- Indeed — this is not a rumour. God confirms the truth to those who receive it and act on it.

- Simon — the first man the risen Lord sought out was the one who denied Him. The worst failure got the first visit.

- Privately — no one recorded what was said at that meeting. The Lord's public words to Peter came later, in front of the others.

- Then the twelve — Peter first, then the whole group. Personal grace and public evidence both stand.

Luke 24:35 · Darby

And they related what [had happened] on the way, and how he was made known to them in the breaking of bread.

Two disciples had walked eight miles from Jerusalem in sorrow. They met a Stranger who turned out to be the risen Lord, and they walked straight back. This verse is their report. It raises two questions. Why tell about the road at all? And what did the breaking of the bread show them?

Joy that could not sit still

They had barely started the meal at Emmaus when they got up and left. One writer notices what that cost them.

Would they sit quietly at Emmaus and go on with their supper? They had walked nearly eight miles out. They must cover the same distance again if they were to sleep at Jerusalem... They must return at once, and let those at Jerusalem who had been mourning and weeping know what they had to tell. Spiritual joy is unselfish. There is the desire that others should share in it.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

What made them speak was not stronger conviction about doctrine but a sight of Him:

They are witnesses. They are not merely people who hold the right beliefs about Scripture — they have seen the Lord themselves. Such a view unseals the lips. They must speak; they cannot do otherwise.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

News waiting at the door

They came to give a report and received one first — the Lord had already appeared to Simon Peter.

They go to tell their news. As they get in at the door, their own faith is confirmed in the most beautiful way: someone at once exclaims, "The Lord has risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!" God always confirms the soul that receives and answers to the truth.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Two reports were arriving from different directions. The Lord meant it that way.

Filled with the one great event that began a new world, they hurried back to Jerusalem... Then the two told the story of their wonderful journey. More wonderful still was their recognition of Jesus in the breaking of bread. The Lord was proving that there should be independent witnesses.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why "what had happened on the road" mattered

Half their report was about the walk, where He opened the Scriptures to them. That was deliberate teaching.

The written Word was enough to have taught them about all that had gone on. Reproving them first for slowness of heart in believing it, He turned them to it. He would settle their faith on what God had already granted. He gave them no fresh revelation. They must stand on the written word of God. That done, He made Himself known as risen from the dead... What He sought for those two, He seeks for still: that souls should take God at His word, and rest on what has been revealed.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The sign by which He was known

The second half of their report names one action. Commentators note it echoed the upper room, and that it identified Him as a Man who had died.

How touching also is the way by which He makes Himself known. "He took the bread and blessed and broke it and gave it to them." Would it not at once recall that other scene in the upper room? There He took bread, and gave thanks, and broke it and gave it to them, saying, "This is My body, which is given for you." The whole act proclaimed who He was, and recalled His dying love.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Was this meal the Lord's Supper? Commentators draw a careful line:

This was not celebrating the Lord's Supper with them. Yet it took up that part of it — the act of breaking the bread — which was the sign of His death.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Recognised, then gone

He disappeared at the moment they knew Him. Writers treat that as the pattern for every believer since.

They had indeed lost their Messiah as they once knew Him in flesh and blood. Now they had their first glimpse of Him in the new resurrection conditions He had entered, and that first glimpse completely changed them. Under His teaching they had just seen that He Himself was the theme of all Scripture. But even while they listened, and their hearts burned as a result, they only saw Him with their natural eyes and did not know Him. Now He vanishes from sight, and they do know Him by faith. What an exchange!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

He is only rightly seen by the Christian when unseen... For the present, new things have come in. The Redeemer has gone to heaven, not come to Zion. On earth His own disciples know Him in the breaking of bread. Faith alone knows His presence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Word first. He gave them no new revelation on the road. He turned them back to the Scriptures already written, so their faith would rest there.

- Sign second. The broken bread proclaimed who He was and recalled His dying love. It was the sign of His death, though this meal was not the Lord's Supper.

- Sight withdrawn. The instant they recognised Him, He was gone. They exchanged seeing Him with natural eyes for knowing Him by faith.

- Lips unsealed. People who have seen the Lord cannot stay quiet. Joy in Him is unselfish, and it walks eight miles at night to share the news.

- Witness confirmed. They arrived and heard that He had appeared to Simon. Two witnesses met from different directions, and each confirmed the other.

Luke 24:36 · Darby

And as they were saying these things, he himself stood in their midst, and says to them, Peace [be] unto you.

The two disciples back from Emmaus were still telling their story when the risen Lord stood among them. He greeted them with an everyday word, peace — yet they first had to be sure this was the same Jesus who had died.

The Room He Entered

This was not a triumphant welcome. He came to a group hiding behind shut doors, and He used words any Jew would use at a door.

John, who was there, tells us the doors were shut for fear of the Jews. Yet the Lord stood among them and greeted them with words everyone knew: "Peace be to you." It was the usual Jewish greeting (Luke 10:5). They were terrified and frightened at what they saw, for they thought it was a spirit.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A Greeting That Had Become a Gift

The same familiar phrase now carried more than it ever had. Earlier in Luke, Jesus sent seventy messengers out to say "Peace be to this house" — a wish. Here the risen Christ is not wishing.

"Peace be to you," the risen Saviour said to His disciples when He came back to them. He let them read their title to peace. Peace was now not merely wished for. He pronounced it with authority and handed it to them on the strength of the Cross. Jesus now gave peace to them, because He had already made it for them… We do not just say, like the seventy He sent out, "Peace be to this house," as a greeting or a good wish. We proclaim the sure, settled, purchased peace, which sinners have a title to in the blood of the Cross.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

How That Peace Reaches a Person

Christ made peace at one point in history and announced it at another. How does it become yours?

He rises from the dead, and the very first word He says to the company is, "Peace to you."… How do you get it? "Being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ" (Rom. 5:1). Christ is it. On the cross He made it. Risen, He proclaims it. In faith you receive it, and in the power of the Holy Spirit you enjoy it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why They Were Still Afraid

He announced peace, yet the room filled with terror. What He did next shows where troubled hearts are meant to look.

When the Lord appeared among His disciples on the day of the resurrection, He found them troubled by thoughts arising in their hearts. At once He dispels their fears by directing their gaze to Himself. He says, "See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself" (Luke 24:36-39). Looking within filled them with doubts and fears. Looking outward at their risen Lord, they saw at once in His hands and feet the proofs that He had died for them and that He was risen. This brought peace and joy into their hearts.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Trouble He Took Over Their Certainty

He would not leave them guessing about who He was.

The end of the Gospel of Luke is the basis of every record in the Acts. It is remarkable how Jesus, in perfect grace, takes pains to make the disciples certain that He was the same Jesus whom they had known. Luke tells us there that He ate and drank to show it (Luke 24:36, etc.).

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The body He showed them had flesh and bones. One thing it did not have.

"A spirit," He said, "does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have." He was clothed in His body raised from the dead. Flesh and bones marked it out, for He was, and is, a Man. It should be noted that there is no mention of blood. Blood, which is the life of the flesh (Lev. 17:14), was poured out when He died (Luke 22:20). That life given up was never taken back.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Standing in the Middle

The little group in that room was the start of something that has not ended.

"As they were talking about these things, Jesus Himself stood among them." Around Him stood the company of disciples who were His own, whom He never ceased to love. There was the beginning of His kingdom, the start of His Church on earth over 1,900 years ago… That company began on the resurrection day. It continues to this day, and you, Christian, are part of it. If we have given the Lord His place in our hearts we will not assert ourselves in His circle.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Made — The greeting did not create peace. Christ made it at the cross, then came from that finished work to announce it.

- Pronounced — An everyday greeting became a settled gift. He did not wish them peace; He gave what He had already purchased.

- Received — He made peace on the cross and proclaims it risen. You take it by faith and enjoy it in the power of the Spirit.

- Proved — Looking outward cured their fear, not looking inward. He showed them hands, feet, flesh and bones — the same Jesus, risen.

- Gathered — He stood in the middle of His own, and that circle has never closed. Every believer since belongs to the company He entered that evening.

Luke 24:37 · Darby

But they, being confounded and being frightened, supposed they beheld a spirit.

The disciples had just been saying that the Lord had risen, when He Himself stood among them. Why did people who had just spoken of resurrection take Him for a ghost, and how did He calm them?

Faith on their lips, fear in their hearts

These were not strangers. They were the very people who had just announced the resurrection out loud. One writer sets the confession beside the collapse:

They too needed a risen Saviour's challenge to bring them to their senses — to calm their fears and lift their drooping spirits. They had just declared to their two brothers from Emmaus, "The Lord is risen indeed." Yet when their risen Lord appeared they did not know Him. He had to challenge their hearts with His stirring words: "Why are you troubled, and why do doubts arise in your hearts?"

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What frightened them

Commentators differ on the cause. One says they knew whose face they were looking at. What shook them was the way He arrived:

Here it is plain they recognised the form of the Lord. In none of His appearances to them do we find anything ghostly that would make them think they saw a spirit. The two on the road to Emmaus had just before taken Him for an ordinary man… His sudden appearance, with the door shut, staggered them… So it was not a question of whether it was Jesus or someone else, but whether it was Jesus in the body or as a spirit only.

Modernised from Frederick William GrantOriginal wording

Another traces it to failed recognition, and sees in it something wider in us all:

They most likely failed to recognise Him. They were not expecting Him to come at that time or in that way. So they imagined they saw a phantom until the Master said, "It is I."… In general, the hidden unbelief of man's heart stops him from accepting divine power and love at work in ways beyond the ordinary.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Peace announced, peace not yet enjoyed

He had already greeted them before the fear rose. Many still live in that gap between His word and their feelings:

At the start of that day the disciples did not enjoy peace. We read, "But they were startled and frightened and thought they saw a spirit." Many believers today, sad to say, are terrified and frightened. Why? They have not got Christ simply before them… Are you troubled in your mind? Have you any ground for it?… This is Christ's way with the troubled. We see others troubled and perhaps say, "Poor souls." Then we leave them in their misery and make no real effort to help. In all this we are not much like Christ. He always stoops to put a troubled person at peace.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A real body, not a ghost

Their guess was wrong in a way that mattered. The Lord answered it with evidence they could see:

There was His body; it was risen. Who could doubt any longer that it was really the same Jesus who died, and will yet come in glory? "See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself!"… The point here is the reality of the resurrection. The risen Jesus is the same one they had known as their Master — still man, not a spirit, but having flesh and bones, and able to eat with them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Feelings are not faith

Fear was not the only feeling in that room. Joy came next, and it hindered them just as much:

It may be worth noticing that our natural feelings often work against faith. It was so with the disciples at this moment. First they were terrified and frightened, and supposed they had seen a spirit. Afterwards they did not believe for joy. Both their fear and their joy — their natural emotions — were hindrances to faith. But it should be added that emotions produced by the Spirit of God are helps to faith, not hindrances.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The direction of the cure

Notice what the Lord did not tell them to examine. He turned their eyes outward:

At once He drives away their fears by directing their gaze to Himself… Looking within filled them with doubts and fears. Looking outside themselves at their risen Lord, they at once saw in His hands and feet the proofs that He had died for them and that He was risen. This brought peace and joy into their hearts.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Confession — They had said "The Lord is risen indeed" and still did not know Him. Right words are not the same as a heart at rest.

- Cause — Some writers say the shut door and sudden arrival staggered them. Others say they failed to recognise Him, because they expected nothing of the sort. Either way, unbelief was underneath.

- Correction — He answered their word "spirit" with hands, feet, flesh and bones. It was the same Jesus who died — risen, and still a man.

- Caution — Fear blocked their faith, and so did joy. Feelings, whichever way they swing, do not measure what is true.

- Cure — Their fears rose from within. Their peace came from outside: He fixed their eyes on Himself, and He still stoops to put a troubled person at peace.

Luke 24:38 · Darby

And he said to them, Why are ye troubled? and why are thoughts rising in your hearts?

The risen Lord has just spoken peace into the room, and the response is terror — the disciples take Him for a ghost. His answer is a question, not a rebuke. It points to where the fear began: in their own hearts.

A question asked in grace

The question is not cold. One writer traces the fear to its cause, then sets Christ's way with troubled people beside our own.

There are many believers today who are terrified and frightened. Why? They do not have Christ simply before them... Are you troubled in your mind? Listen to what He says. Have you any ground for it? Have you any occasion for it? "Why are you troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?" This is Christ's way with the troubled. We see others troubled. Perhaps we say, "Poor souls," but we leave them still in their misery, making no great effort to help them. In all this we are not much like Christ. No, He always stoops to put a troubled person at peace.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What the doubts are

The ESV says "doubts." One commentator gives two other ways the word has been translated.

Luke 24:38. — "Reasonings." American Revisions: "questionings."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

These questionings are not harmless. When our own thoughts take the place of God's, we pay for it.

You will find that the thoughts you have are not always God's thoughts. The thoughts of your heart are a frequent cause of loss of communion, trial, and discomfort to you. "Why do thoughts arise in your hearts?" was the question our risen Saviour asked His disciples. It was followed by, "Then He opened their understanding, that they might understand the Scriptures." It brought Him before them instead of themselves.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Look outward, not inward

The Lord does not send them searching inside themselves. He turns their eyes to Himself.

It is the outward look to Christ risen that gives the inward peace, and the word of God that gives assurance. The Lord appeared among His disciples on the day of the resurrection. He found them troubled by thoughts arising in their hearts. At once He dispels their fears by directing their gaze to Himself. He says, "Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself." Looking within filled them with doubts and fears. Looking outward at their risen Lord, they at once saw in His hands and feet the proofs that He had died for them, and that He was risen. This brought peace and joy into their hearts.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Hands and feet: a real body, not a ghost

He answers the fear of a ghost with His own body. Even the words He picks carry meaning.

"Why do thoughts arise in your hearts?" He asked them. "Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself: handle Me and see; for a spirit has not flesh and bones, as you see Me have"! ... Why did our risen Lord say "flesh and bones," and not "flesh and blood"? His blood had been poured out for our eternal redemption.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Love that cannot bear to be doubted

Behind the question stands a wounded affection. The One asking it had died for the very people now unsure of Him.

He had said to them, "Peace be to you." It touched His tender heart that there should be trouble or a thought in their hearts! How could such deep, sincere love bear to be doubted? He had loved them to death... One had denied Him, and all had forsaken Him. But now God had raised Him from the dead, for their justification... how could He then bear a cloud of trouble, or one doubting thought, in the hearts of those He had so loved?

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Grace that stoops to weakness

Christ does not lift them up into glory here. He comes down to where they are.

The whole scene in Luke 24 has this character. He meets men in their weakness. He does not take them up to the higher place in glory... "Why do thoughts arise in your hearts... handle Me and see... it is I Myself." How gracious!

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace spoken. He greets them with peace before He asks the question. The trouble was in the room, not in His heart toward them.

- Thoughts risen. The "doubts" are reasonings, or questionings. Our own thoughts take the place of God's, and cost us communion and comfort.

- Eyes outward. Looking within produced fear. Looking at the risen Lord produced peace, and His word gives assurance.

- Hands and feet. The proof is a real body: flesh and bones, not a spirit. He does not say "flesh and blood," because His blood had already been poured out for redemption.

- Grace stooping. He meets them in their weakness instead of lifting them to glory. His love cannot bear a doubt from those He died for.

A note on wording: where the ESV says "doubts," older translations say "thoughts arise in your hearts." Where the ESV says "See my hands and my feet," they say "Behold." Several quotes above use the older wording.

Luke 24:39 · Darby

behold my hands and my feet, that it is *I* myself. Handle me and see, for a spirit has not flesh and bones as ye see me having.

The disciples had already heard that the Lord was risen. Yet when He stood among them, they thought they were seeing a ghost. His answer was not an argument but an invitation: look at the hands and feet, and put your own hands on Him.

"It is I myself"

He met their fear with the simplest proof of all. He gave them Himself, to see and to touch.

He presents Himself to His disciples. Their hopes are ruined and their future is scattered, and they are terrified and afraid. They had laid all their hopes in the grave of Jesus, never to rise again, as they thought... And how does He reassure their hearts? He presents HIMSELF, saying, "See my hands and my feet, that it is I MYSELF."

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

The words "I myself" answer what they feared. A visit from His departed spirit would not have been Him as they knew Him.

To those who had known Him as the living man among them, a mere visit from His departed spirit would not have been "Himself." It is not a question of exact definitions, but of the heart, and the Lord answers the heart. They saw Him. They did not believe that a living man could come among them in that mysterious way, so they thought they saw a spirit. He answers that by telling them to prove He had flesh and bones.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Not a spirit, but a spiritual body

The proof went further than touch. He asked for food and ate in front of them.

It is the Lord Himself, risen from the dead. He is a real man, with hands and feet, able to be touched and seen — not a spirit, but a spiritual body. Of this He gave the fullest proof by going on to eat in their presence. As having a body He could eat; as having a spiritual body He did not need to eat. So the resurrection of the body had its glorious proof in His own person. Their faith needed that, and nothing could support it more strongly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why "flesh and bones" and not "flesh and blood"

Blood belongs to a life that wears out and must be replaced.

The blood applies to the present life. It is the vehicle of change. It is what implies the need of continual sustenance and renewal. A body that needs no renewal cannot need blood to renew it. So the Lord speaks of Himself as risen from the dead, not as having flesh and blood, but as having flesh and bones... He has poured out His blood and left it with the earthly life He had lived. He has entered a new sphere, keeping all that makes Him truly man, but not the conditions of the old earthly life.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Some reduce the risen Christ to a spirit in an unseen world. The word He left out answers them.

Spiritists say that Christ is the supreme Spirit in the unseen world. But God says He is a Man, in a raised, glorified body at His right hand! Why did our risen Lord say "flesh and bones," and not "flesh and blood"? His blood had been poured out for our eternal redemption.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

What this settles about our own resurrection

Some treat "spiritual" as the opposite of physical. This verse settles what the believer's raised body will be.

Scripture does not speak that way. The Spirit tells us that the body the saints will have in the resurrection will be incorruptible and immortal, and spiritual as well. When He rose from the dead our Lord Jesus Christ said to His disciples, "Touch me, and see. For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have." His body was still "flesh and bones," yet it was spiritual. The body of the believer will be the same in resurrection.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The hands and the feet

He showed them the hands and the feet that had served them long before the nails went through.

What wonders those "hands" had worked in their sight! How those "feet" had walked the path ahead of them, never growing tired! Now each one shows, in the mark of the nails, man's cruel and murderous hatred of Him — and even more strongly, the Saviour's love for sinners.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Feelings are not faith

Terror came first, then joy — and neither one produced belief.

Our natural feelings are often in conflict with faith. It was so with the disciples at this moment. At first they were terrified and afraid, and thought they had seen a spirit. Later, their joy kept them from believing. Both their fear and their joy — their natural emotions — were hindrances to faith. But it should be added that emotions produced by the Spirit of God are helps to faith and not hindrances.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Himself. He did not argue them out of their fear; He gave them His own Person to look at and to touch.

- Bones. "Flesh and bones" says the body is real; the silence about blood says He never took back the life He poured out at the cross.

- Handled. He told them to touch Him, then ate in front of them. That proves a real body — one that could eat, but no longer needed to.

- Spiritual. His risen body was spiritual and still flesh and bones; the believer's raised body will be of the same kind.

- Faith. Fear kept them from believing, and so did joy. Only He Himself, seen and touched, settled their hearts.

Luke 24:40 · Darby

And having said this he shewed them his hands and his feet.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Luke 24:41 · Darby

But while they yet did not believe for joy, and were wondering, he said to them, Have ye anything here to eat?

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Luke 24:42 · Darby

And they gave him part of a broiled fish and of a honeycomb;

It is the evening of resurrection day. The disciples are standing in a room with a Man they had watched die. They are too glad and too startled to trust their own eyes. What they hand Him — a piece of broiled fish — settles the question that words alone had not. Some translations also add a honeycomb to the meal, which is why several writers name both.

Joy that could not yet believe

Their problem was not coldness but confusion. Joy and wonder ran ahead of faith, and His question about food met them right there.

Wonder and joy were mingled in their minds, and I can understand the mixed state of their hearts. They were thrilled with joy, while hampered with unbelief and wonder. His words, "Have you anything here to eat?" made the reality of His presence absolute to them... All was now clear. Every mist of doubt rolled away as they saw Him eat.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A body that could eat, though it needed nothing

His eating proves He has a body. It does not mean He was hungry. Commentators draw a careful line here between what the risen Lord was able to do and what He required.

It is the Lord Himself, risen from the dead. He is a real man, with hands and feet they could touch and see. He is not a spirit, but has a spiritual body. Of this He gave the fullest proof by proceeding to eat in their presence. As having a body He could eat; as having a spiritual body He did not need to eat. So His own person gave the resurrection of the body its glorious proof. Their faith needed this, and nothing could support it more strongly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Real matter, no longer a body for earth

The same act says two things at once. It rules out a phantom, and it also shows a body that is no longer tied to earthly conditions.

Scripture also shows us that the resurrection body does not depend on earthly conditions. At the same time, it can enter into them. He ate the broiled fish and honeycomb to show them His body was truly material. Yet it was no longer a body for the earth.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the body itself had to be proved

Why does a meal matter so much? One writer answers: rescuing the spirit alone would have left the body as Satan's trophy.

Suppose God had said, "Satan has ruined your body, so I will take you to be with Me in spirit." That would have confirmed Satan's victory over the body. Did God come into the world to do that?... it is necessary to see that He has got a victory in this world; so to prove this, the Lord stoops down in a wonderful way. "He said to them, Have you anything here to eat?" Why was all that? Simply to verify that it was no mere spirit that stood before them. The Lord came to fight a battle for you — real flesh and blood you can touch. Manhood you can touch was destroyed, so manhood you can touch must be redeemed.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The same Man, stooping to their table

Risen and glorified, He does not hold Himself at a distance. He is still the same Man His friends knew.

The Lord presents Himself as the very same Man... Here also His hands, His feet, all that marked His manhood, His previous wounds are presented. He eats... The Lord shows it to them in a very ordinary, close-up way. He eats and drinks in front of them — how far He stoops! But this was reality and truth. It restored their souls and made them know Him as still a Man — risen indeed, but a Man, truly and really.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Their food here, His food later

Notice whose meal this was. The fish came from their own supper. A later meal by the lake turns that around.

The Lord was about to give them the strongest proof that His Person was real. So He eats the broiled fish and honeycomb they had provided for themselves. This assures them it is really Himself. When you come to John 21, again there was broiled fish, but this time He provided it, to assure them that He cared for them. How rich and deep is the grace that ever provides that which will confirm our faith, and feed and sustain our souls.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Evidence for them, love from Him

The meal met a need, but not His own. Behind the evidence stands His love for His own.

The One they killed on a tree ate and drank with His own after He rose from the dead. He did not need the food. They needed the evidence that He was alive from the dead — a truly risen Man, Who loved His own who were in the world, and loved them to the fullest.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Doubt — their unbelief came from joy, not hardness, and He answered it with a fact they could watch.

- Body — as a man He could eat; as risen He did not need to, so the meal proves reality without implying weakness.

- Victory — Satan ruined the manhood you can touch, so Christ redeemed the manhood you can touch. A rescued spirit alone would leave the body lost.

- Stooping — the risen Lord takes food His friends had kept for themselves. Later, by the lake, He provides the meal Himself.

- Witness — He did not need the fish. They needed the evidence that He was alive, and that evidence became the ground of their faith.