Luke 2:4–7

It was not carried out at the time in view here as first proposed. But it was enough to call the parents of our Lord from Nazareth in Galilee to Bethlehem. That accomplished not man's census, but God's prophecy. God took care that it should be fulfilled just enough to carry out His purposes.

The proud Roman Emperor, Caesar Augustus, set all the machinery in motion to bring this taxing about. He little thought that it was to fulfil the Scripture: "But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days" (Micah 5:2). That prophecy came more than seven centuries before the birth of our Lord. In it we see His manhood, the place of His birth, and also the careful assertion of His deity.

From the time a woman among the Jews was engaged, she was considered legally the wife of the man she was betrothed to. So the Lord, while really the Son of His mother Mary, was legally of Joseph; and both Joseph and Mary were of the royal line. So the Lord Jesus represented David on both sides. But as the law required, He was the descendant of Solomon on the legal side. He was without question the Son of Mary, descended from the Nathan branch. Yet by law He could not be Messiah while a living representative of the Solomon branch remained. Being the legally reputed Son of Joseph as well as Mary's child, the Lord was descended exactly as He needed to be, in every required respect "David's Son," the Messiah.

He was an obscure village carpenter. This proved the truth of the prophet's words that the tabernacle of David had fallen down and lay in ruins (Amos 9:11). Yet he showed marks of true royalty according to God: in his mercy toward the weak and, as he thought, the failing, and in his trust in the Word of God and his obedience to it.

Bethlehem is "the House of Bread," fittingly the birthplace, long afterward, of Him who as the "Bread of God" came down from heaven to give life to the world. Judah, "praise," is the royal tribe through which in grace the "King" was to come. Praise always flows from knowing the fullness of blessing that is ours in Christ. So food and worship are closely connected — Bethlehem is in Judah.

Once a Jewish woman was betrothed, the law counted her as the wife of the man she was promised to. So the Lord was really the Son of His mother Mary, and legally the son of Joseph. Both Joseph and Mary were of the royal line. The Lord Jesus, therefore, represented David on both sides; but as the law required, He was the descendant of Solomon on the legal side. He was the Son of Mary and descended through Nathan's branch of David's family. Even so, He could not be the Messiah under the law while a living representative of Solomon's branch remained. But the Lord was counted by law as Joseph's son, as well as being Mary's child. So His descent was exactly what was needed to make Him "David's Son," the Messiah, in every required respect.

More than seven hundred years before the birth of Christ the prophet Micah had said in the name of Jehovah, "But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days." The chief priests and scribes quoted these words when Herod asked where Christ should be born. So they took them as a prediction of the Messiah's birthplace. But Mary's home was at Nazareth in Galilee, and the time was drawing near for the birth of her holy Child.

Caesar Augustus acts for the sake of his subjects. Yet without knowing it, he is the means of fulfilling the prophecy that Jesus should be born in Bethlehem... All the world is in movement to bring about one event that prophecy required. The poor carpenter, with Mary, His betrothed wife, must be in the city of David, and David's heir must be born there and then... Who cared to notice the poor Jew, though he might be of the house and line of David? The things that are completely unimportant to man fill the heart and eye of God.

Even the people of God were placed in servitude. Remarkably, the mother of the Messiah had to obey the decree of the Roman Emperor, and so did His legal father. They went up for the census to their own city, the city of David, Bethlehem, and so fulfilled the prophecies... The decree was not carried out at the time proposed here. But it went far enough to call the parents of our Lord from Nazareth in Galilee to Bethlehem. That accomplished not man's census, but God's prophecy.

The circumstances of His birth show how complete the humiliation is into which He has come. Caesar is lord of the world, and orders it as he pleases, for his own purposes... yet He is in it as under Caesar's rule, Joseph and Mary being brought out of Nazareth to Bethlehem to be enrolled as of David's line. Despite all this, the power of the world is working, without knowing it, to fulfil a prophecy about One it does not know. Once this is done, the plan drops as if it had never been.

The virgin who lived at Nazareth had to be taken to Bethlehem. There she gave birth to Him whose kingdom would in time break the Roman empire in pieces and fill the whole earth. She was poor. Naturally she would not have left Nazareth at such a time. They seem to have been friendless too, at Bethlehem. The inn was crowded. No one offered them a home.

The appointed time (Galatians 4:4) had come. According to prophecy the Saviour had to be born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2). But Mary lived in Nazareth. God in His own marvellous way ordered everything. He directed Caesar Augustus to issue the decree of taxation at just such a time and in just such a way. He ordered the journey of Joseph and his promised wife Mary too, so that she had to be in Bethlehem when the time came for her to give birth.

"The fullness of time" is an important expression here. The Seed was spoken of in Eden, but God let some 4,000 years run their course before He sent Him forth. In this we may see the perfect wisdom of His ways. He would allow man to fully show his condition. He tried the creature in a variety of ways, under conscience and under law, sending prophets, and so on. But what was the result? Man proved himself in every way a creature beyond cure. Sin, wrongdoing and hostility were everywhere.

The emperor and his decree are only insignificant instruments. Caesar Augustus acts with his own subjects in view. Yet without knowing it, he is the means of fulfilling the prophecy that Jesus would be born in Bethlehem. The entire course of the world runs outside the current of God's thoughts. The central fact for Him and for His kingdom here is the babe's birth at Bethlehem; but the emperor has no thought about it... Who cared to notice the poor Jew, though he might be of the house and lineage of David? The things that are perfectly indifferent to man fill the heart and eye of God.

It was not carried out at the time proposed here. But it went far enough to call the parents of our Lord from Nazareth in Galilee to Bethlehem. That accomplished not man's census, but God's prophecy. God took care that it should be fulfilled just enough to carry out His purposes.

If God is sovereign in His purposes, His sovereignty is no less displayed in His choice of instruments to fulfil them. More than seven hundred years before the birth of Christ, the prophet Micah had said in the name of Jehovah: "But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in Israel, whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days."

But we see God's hand in her movements. The Emperor in Italy was the instrument that made the Virgin leave her home for Bethlehem, and give birth to her child there... She was poor. In the normal course she would not have left Nazareth at such a time. They seem to have been friendless at Bethlehem too. The inn was crowded. No one offered them a home... The world did not want the presence of the One whose birth heaven would rejoice over.

There seemed no likelihood that the Babe would be born at Bethlehem. But the Emperor commanded that everyone should go to his own town for the census. God arranged it in His providence to fulfil His word. So it is today. There is no movement in the world that God is not ruling directly, or overruling indirectly, for the gathering of His people.

The Son of God is born in this world, but He finds no place there. The world is at home in the inn, or at least its resources find it a place there. The inn becomes a measure of man's place in the world, and of the welcome the world gives him. The Son of God finds no place at all, except the manger. Does the Holy Spirit record this detail for nothing? No. There is no room in this world for God, or for what is of God. That makes the love which brought Him down to earth all the more perfect. He began in a manger and ended on the cross, and in between He had nowhere to lay His head.

Luke always loves to present moral features. So it is very instructive for us that Jesus lay in the manger, not in the inn. The children of men found their place in the inn according to their means, as it suited them. Those who had money could command a place in proportion to what they were willing to pay. But the parents of the Lord were so poor that people at the inn utterly despised them. The only place where they could find shelter for the Babe was a manger. Yet this did not stop the outflow of divine grace, and only unbelief could deny the divine glory of the One laid there.

He ignored the imperial city of Rome. He passed by the royal city of Jerusalem and chose Bethlehem, though it was "little among the thousands of Judah." He also passed by the poor fare the village inn could supply, and chose the shelter of the ox's stall. There in Bethlehem's stable the One "whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting" was born and cradled in a manger.

Who would have thought of the Son of God coming to earth as a Man in the way He did? Look for the Son of the Highest whom the angels are celebrating, and what do you find? A "babe" — the weakest of beings. "Wrapped in swaddling cloths" — the badge of helplessness, worn by One who had clothed Himself with light as with a garment. "Lying in a manger" — in the company of the animals!

"First-born son," prototokos; but when Luke speaks of an only son he uses monogenes: Luke 7:12; Luke 8:42; Luke 9:38.

"Firstborn son" in Luke 2:7 proves that the perpetual virginity of Mary, and the worship of Mary in extreme ritual religion, are fictions.

He was rich and He became poor. A man in conversation with me denied the eternal deity of our Lord Jesus Christ. He argued that Jesus began to exist in the manger at Bethlehem. My answer was this Scripture: He was rich, and He became poor. If what that man believed was true, then our Lord never was rich before He was poor, and the Scripture is a lie. There was none poorer than He on the day He was born in David's city. A manger was His cradle and a stable His shelter!

So the poorest child who has become aware of his sin may realise this: the Son of God has been younger than he is, and lower than he is. He brought all the might of Omnipotence into swaddling cloths, and all the wealth of God's matchless grace into a stable.

We live in a day when people seem to have less and less time for one another. Children, and unborn children, are often unwanted. Young people have trouble finding their place in society, and more and more elderly people live in hard circumstances. It reminds us of the words, "There was no place for them in the inn" (Luke 2:7). It should not be like that, yet even we as believers may show the same wrong attitude.