Luke 15:4–32

Luke 15:4 · Darby

What man of you having a hundred sheep, and having lost one of them, does not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness and go after that which is lost, until he find it?

Tax collectors and open sinners crowded in to hear Jesus. The religious leaders complained that He welcomed such people and ate with them. His reply is a question drawn from ordinary life: a man, his flock, and one missing animal.

The Complaint That Drew Out the Parable

The parable answers a complaint. It defends God's welcome of sinners before people who found that welcome offensive.

God, in the person of the Lord Jesus, had come so very near to the sinner that the legalism of the scribes and Pharisees took offence at it. "This man receives sinners, and eats with them." That was the charge laid against divine grace in the court of man's legal, proud, self-righteous heart. But it was the very glory of God — God manifest in the flesh — God come down to earth to receive sinners. He left His Father's throne not to search for righteous people; why would He search for them? Who would think of going to look for anything but what was lost?

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Three Parables, Three Persons

This verse opens the first of three linked stories. Commentators see the Father, the Son and the Spirit each at work across them.

The parable of the lost sheep pictures the work of the Son. The parable of the lost coin shows the work of the Spirit. The parable of the prodigal son paints in vivid colours the warmth of love with which the Father welcomes the wanderer home.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

An Appeal to Their Own Hearts

Jesus asks His critics to judge the case by what they would do themselves with a missing sheep.

The first thing the Lord Jesus does is to justify God in being good to sinners. He appeals at once to the natural heart of man. "What man of you, having a hundred sheep?" The shepherd puts the sheep on his shoulder and brings it home rejoicing. Have I not a right to seek lost sinners? Is it not a right thing for God to come among tax collectors and sinners? This may not suit a moral man, but it suits God. It is His privilege to come where sin is, and to come near to ruined sinners, because He can deliver them out of it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

All the Movement Is the Shepherd's

The sheep never goes looking for the Shepherd. Every verb of effort belongs to the one who goes after it.

With us it is not a question of our going in search of Christ. It is the man Christ Jesus, the good Shepherd, going after us — after what was lost… It was He who came, and He who took on the labour. It was His to endure the suffering unto death, even the death of the cross. It was He who found and saves the lost sheep… No doubt the sheep does reap the benefit. Yet it was not the sheep that sought the Shepherd, but the Shepherd the sheep.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Until He Finds It"

The Shepherd keeps going until He finds it. Commentators dwell on what that cost Him.

And oh, what tireless grace breathes in the words "until he finds it"! Jesus, our gracious Shepherd, would not let anything defeat Him in the work He had taken up. He came ready to meet every obstacle in His way. He knew all that lay before Him before He could lay His hand on the lost one. He knew He had to face all the malicious opposition of Satan, who would dispute every step of the way with Him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Ninety-Nine and the Open Country

Notice where the shepherd leaves the ninety-nine. The ESV calls the place open country; older translations call it a wilderness.

The ninety-nine stand for the Pharisee and scribe class. They were left not in the fold but in the wilderness — a place of barrenness and death. The one lost sheep stands for the tax collector and sinner class: those who are lost, and know it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Readers still ask who the ninety-nine really are. One writer answers that they are a reflection, not a real group.

The mistake is in treating as real what is only an image in a mirror. The Lord holds that mirror before His audience so that they may recognise themselves. So He must picture them as they themselves think they are — and He uses that estimate at once to convict the one side and to encourage the other.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — The parable answers a complaint. Jesus welcomed sinners, and religious men took offence that God had come that near.

- Seeker — God does the searching, not the sinner. The Shepherd here is the Son. The woman and the father in the next two stories show the Spirit and the Father at the same work.

- Question — The Lord appeals to His critics' own hearts. Any of them would go after a lost sheep. Why deny Him the right to seek lost people?

- Until — The search has no cut-off point. It runs through opposition and cost to the cross itself. The sheep adds nothing to it but its lostness.

- Mirror — The ninety-nine stand in barren open country, not safety. They picture people who think they need no rescue, and the Lord holds that picture up so they can see themselves in it.

Luke 15:5 · Darby

and having found it, he lays it upon his own shoulders, rejoicing;

The Pharisees and scribes had grumbled that Jesus welcomed sinners and ate with them. He answered with a picture: a man searching for one straying sheep out of a hundred. In verse 5 the search succeeds. Everything in it belongs to the shepherd — the finding, the lifting, the carrying, the joy.

Grace that succeeds

Matthew tells the same parable, and the two accounts word the finding differently:

Luke has, "Having found"; Matthew has, "if it should come to pass that he find." The simple explanation is this. Luke's record views the matter from the standpoint of grace. Matthew's views it from that of responsibility.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The story gives the sheep one activity only — wandering. Everything else is the shepherd's, and the parable never even tells us how the sheep felt about it:

The sheep showed its activity in wandering, and in wandering far away. The shepherd showed his activity in going after it to bring it back. No effort was too great, no distance too far for him to go... All that we read of the sheep is its wandering, not a word of its feelings when found. The One who had come to seek and to save the lost draws attention only to the shepherd's feelings. The murmuring Pharisees did not understand what was going on. They did not see why the tax collectors and sinners were drawn to the Lord. They did not share His joy when such people found their way to Him.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Carried, not driven

Finding the sheep was only the first step.

He no sooner finds the sheep than he puts it in the most secure place — "he lays it on his shoulders." How? Complaining of the weight, or the trouble? Oh, no: he lays it on his shoulders "rejoicing." How little the sheep knew of the deep feelings of joy filling the shepherd's soul. It would probably add to his trouble by kicking, plunging, and struggling to tumble off its place of safety and rest. But no matter for that: the shepherd had hold of it, and in that he rejoiced. A loving heart and a powerful shoulder could overcome every obstacle.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Shoulders, plural

One writer weighs the plural against a promise in Isaiah:

In the fifteenth chapter of Luke's Gospel the shepherd has the once lost sheep upon his shoulders. It is his "shoulders," mark, not his shoulder only. Christ is that shepherd, and the Christian is the sheep. The future government of the world is going to rest upon "His shoulder." "His shoulders" are beneath the helpless sheep (Isaiah 9:6; Luke 15:5). The shoulder is the symbol of strength. "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me," Christ says.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Where safety rests

The shepherd carries the sheep, so its safety never depends on its own grip.

As sheep, our security is the responsibility of our Shepherd (1 Peter 2:25). Of each saved sheep it is written, "When He has found it, He lays it on His shoulders, rejoicing." The sheep's struggles would not be to stay on, but to get off. We are not saved by our "holding on," for sheep have no hands to hold on by. The rejoicing Shepherd now carries all the Lord's sheep along on His shoulders, and so all are equally saved. The Shepherd will see to it that not one shall slip off His shoulders.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Whose joy?

The word "rejoicing" attaches to the shepherd, and that is the point of the whole chapter:

In Luke 15 the great principle set out is that it is God's happiness when we are brought back to Him. Of course the joy of the restored one comes in, but it is not the primary thing. The object of all three parables is not to show our joy, but the joy of God in our restoration. The three parables all teach the same grace, but we get, I believe, the joy of the Son, of the Spirit, and of the Father.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

In open country the shepherd had no one to share that joy with. So he holds on until he reaches home.

The shepherd could not bear to let the sheep off his shoulders until he got home. He knew there was no one in the desert who could share his joy... He had to wait until he and his precious charge were inside the quiet walls of his happy home. Then came the outburst of real joy.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Found — Luke drops Matthew's "if" from the finding. This is the story told from the side of grace, where the search cannot fail.

- Lifted — the shepherd does not drive the sheep home. He puts it in the safest place he has, his own shoulders, and makes no complaint about the weight.

- Shoulders — both are under the sheep, while one carries the world's government. The shoulder stands for strength, and all of it works for the helpless.

- Held — sheep have no hands to hold on with. The Shepherd's responsibility, not the sheep's effort, keeps them safe on the way home.

- Rejoicing — the joy is the Shepherd's, and He carries it all the way home before He shares it. God's happiness over the lost is what the murmurers missed.

Luke 15:6 · Darby

and being come to the house, calls together the friends and the neighbours, saying to them, Rejoice with me, for I have found my lost sheep.

The search ends and the celebration begins. But notice who throws the party and who gets invited. The shepherd's first act at home is not to show off the sheep. He calls in company to share his own gladness. So whose joy is salvation?

The Wilderness and the Home

The shepherd carries the sheep the whole way home before anyone celebrates. One writer explains why the joy had to wait.

Finally, notice the words, "when he comes home." This is the high point of the story. There could be no calling together of friends and neighbours in the wilderness. The wilderness is the place that draws out Divine love in seeking and Divine power in saving the lost. It has to be the scene of the shepherd's worry and hard work, because it is a place of danger to the sheep. The shepherd could not bear to let the sheep off his shoulders until he got home. He knew there was no one in the desert who could share his joy. There were wolves there, but that was all.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Joy Belongs to the Finder

The sheep is safe. But the story presses a different point.

One word stands out in this three-part story: "I have FOUND." The Shepherd found the sheep. The woman found the silver. The Father found the son. The sheep, the silver and the son were saved, and no one will question that. But that is not what the Lord is showing here. He is showing that they were lost and found. They were lost — to whom were they lost? To the Shepherd, the woman and the Father. But we do not talk of a thing as lost that has no value. We do not seek what is worth nothing; and when we have found what we had lost, the joy is ours.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

"Rejoice With Me" as the Root of Worship

The call is not "be happy for yourself" but "share my joy." One writer says worship begins right there.

Some suppose this is only about the sinner's need to be saved, or his joy when he is saved. That forgets the fullness of love in God and in Christ Jesus our Lord. There is a far deeper joy, and this is the foundation of all true worship. Our joy is not just the feeling of our own rescue. It is our appreciation of His delight in rescuing us, His joy in our salvation. This is communion, and there can be no worship in the Spirit without it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Friends and Neighbours

The shepherd calls in those already close to him. That closeness is what the critics in front of Jesus lacked.

The Shepherd shares His joy with His friends and neighbours. He says to them, "Rejoice with Me, for I have found My sheep that was lost." Those who live in close communion with the Son of God know what this means, and are blessed by it. His interests are theirs. What He achieves in saving grace gives them material for holy triumph and delight. But where did these religious men stand with Him? Instead of rejoicing in His joy, they could only offer cold criticism of His goodness to the needy and lost.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

One writer names who those friends are.

Then the reception, the gathering together of the friends, the angels, to tell them all to rejoice with Him!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

God's Own Gladness as His Defence

The critics objected to the company Jesus kept. His answer was not an argument but a picture of God's own gladness.

Only think of that! Ask the Lord God for a reason for His ways of salvation with you and me, and He says that He takes delight in them. They make Him and His glorious dwelling rejoice. Would his neighbours complain at the shepherd's joy over his lost sheep now found? Would the woman's friends begrudge her pleasure? So it is with God. It is His own joy in the salvation of sinners that Jesus offers as His warrant. Let us hold this thought in our hearts: our God has done nothing less than make our salvation the scene of His own happiness.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Three Calls to Rejoice

Some link the shepherd, the woman and the father with the three Persons of the Godhead, each with a part in one recovery.

One writer has suggested that in verse 6 "Rejoice with me" may be the Father and the Holy Spirit rejoicing in the work of the Son. In verse 9 it would be the Father and the Son rejoicing in the work of the Spirit. And "let us eat and be merry" in verse 23 would be the Father, Son and Holy Spirit rejoicing together. No doubt we are brought into this joy too. But these verses seem to point to the joy that belongs to the Persons in the Godhead as They recover man for Their pleasure.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sought — the wilderness is where love searches and power saves. No one out there can share the joy.

- Carried — the shepherd keeps the sheep on his shoulders the whole way home, so the arrival is His work.

- Found — the word that stands out is "I have found." What is lost is lost to someone, and no one searches for what has no value.

- Shared — "Rejoice with me" widens His gladness into company: friends, neighbours, angels.

- Answered — the critics wanted a reason for His kindness to sinners. The reason is God's own delight, since He has made our salvation the scene of His happiness.

Luke 15:7 · Darby

I say unto you, that thus there shall be joy in heaven for one repenting sinner, [more] than for ninety and nine righteous who have no need of repentance.

Religious leaders had complained that Jesus welcomed disreputable people and ate with them. He answers with the parable of the lost sheep, then tells them what heaven celebrates: one repenting sinner set against ninety-nine who need no repentance.

Spoken to Murmurers

Two groups stood around Jesus: outcasts drawn to Him, and religious leaders who resented it.

There is a drawing power in the person of Christ that brings tax collectors and sinners to hear Him. The Pharisees and scribes resented this. In proud self-righteousness they condemned Him for receiving and eating with sinners. Sad indeed that they can discern the sin of others while blind to the sin of their own hearts.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same moment produced two opposite feelings on earth. Heaven joins only one of them.

He was rejoicing. The Pharisees were murmuring. But others would share His joy. The inhabitants of heaven could understand it, and they all will have part in it. … It is enough for now to call attention to the untiring love of the true Shepherd in seeking, and to His unceasing joy at finding. The Lord was telling out secrets of His own heart.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The Ninety-Nine

The comparison is no compliment to a better class of people. It points straight at the men who were complaining.

The ninety-nine who need no repentance never know they are lost, so they will never be debtors to God's mere mercy. Such were those Pharisees who were finding fault with grace… What is the definition, then, that the Lord gives of a repenting sinner? A "lost sheep." You see, He was speaking to the heart — not mere doctrine. He spoke this way to lay hold of the souls around Him. These poor sinners, at least, would know that the lost sheep meant them. And these Pharisees would know that the ninety-nine who needed no repentance were themselves. In fact, there were no such persons.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

But suppose such people could be found. Heaven's joy would still fall on the other side.

On earth you cannot find the "ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance." But it is sadly easy to find ninety-nine who imagine themselves to be such. Yet even if they existed, there is more joy in heaven over one repentant sinner than over them. All the countless holy angels in heaven have never caused such joy as one repentant sinner. What astounding grace this is!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Joy Over Repentance

The joy has a precise object. It is not the rescue itself.

Notice, finally, that it is joy "over one sinner who repents," not exactly over his salvation. It is joy over a soul brought to confess its sin, judge itself, and vindicate God. We tend to be more occupied with the deliverance from immediate danger. In short, we tend to feel for the human side far more than we enter into God's moral glory or His grace. The joy in heaven is over the repenting sinner.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So everything turns on the word "repents." The usual definitions of it fall short.

Some say it is sorrow for sin. Some say it is a change of mind, resting on the literal meaning of the word. Others say it includes the decision to forsake sin and to do the will of God in the future. In truth it is none of these, nor all of them combined… Scriptural repentance is nothing less than our siding with God in His judgment of our sins. It is taking His part against ourselves, and so bowing in the dust before Him in true self-judgment.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Heaven's Scale of Values

One sinner outweighs everything the world calls great.

Empires may rise and fall. Kings may step down or be crowned. These things shake the world and fill the front pages of our newspapers, but they do not move heaven. Yet if one sinner repents and turns to God, if the Shepherd finds one sheep, there is joy in heaven. Incredible! Yes, we would say that, if Jesus had not told us — but He surely knows what heaven values.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The Mind of Heaven — and Ours

Since the verse reports what heaven feels, it also exposes what we feel.

But man as such does not rejoice when his fellow turns in sorrow and self-judgment to God. This is not the feeling of the earth, where sin and selfishness reign. But it is certainly the mind of heaven… The Lord here assures us that a repentant sinner sets the keynote of joy on high. There are no murmurers there; it is universal delight in love. Is it so with us?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Murmur — The verse answers a complaint. Religious men resented that Jesus received sinners. They saw sin in others and missed it in themselves.

- Mirror — The ninety-nine who need no repentance are those same complainers, as they saw themselves. No such person exists.

- Meaning — Heaven's joy is over a repenting sinner. That means one who sides with God against himself in true self-judgment, not just one pulled out of danger.

- Measure — Heaven's scale is not ours. Empires rise and fall without moving heaven. One returning sinner sets its keynote of joy.

- Match — Earth murmurs where heaven rejoices. There are no murmurers in heaven, so the test is simple: does our joy match heaven's?

Luke 15:8 · Darby

Or, what woman having ten drachmas, if she lose one drachma, does not light a lamp and sweep the house and seek carefully till she find it?

The middle parable of Luke 15 is the shortest of the three: a woman, a house, a lamp, and one small silver coin. Everything turns on what is lost, who does the searching, and why she takes such trouble over so little.

A coin, not a sheep

In the first parable a living animal wanders off. Here the lost thing cannot move at all.

This time a sheep does not stand for the lost creature. A sheep has life of a certain sort, but it has that life only to go astray. In this parable the lost piece of money is a lifeless thing, and that best expresses what a lost sinner is in the mind of the Spirit of God. He not only slipped aside... but meanwhile the soul is only a dead thing spiritually, with no more power to return than the missing piece of silver.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The two pictures fit together. Each matches a way the letters of the New Testament describe the sinner.

Here that which is lost is lifeless, in contrast with the first parable, which represents a living thing as going astray (the lost sheep). The letters to the Romans and to the Ephesians view the sinner from these two points of view. Activity in sin is the point in Romans; death — spiritual death — is the point in Ephesians.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Who the woman pictures

Commentators differ over whom the woman stands for:

Some, including Stier and Alford, have followed Bengel in treating the woman as a symbol of the Holy Spirit, since the Hebrew word for spirit is feminine. Maclaren, however, on this verse and on verse 4, says that "the owner should be the seeker … Jesus." The mention of "friends and neighbours" (verses 5, 9) seems to support this.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Lost inside the house

Where the coin was lost matters as much as what it was.

Unlike the sheep, which had strayed upon the mountains, the piece of silver was lost in the house. 2 Timothy 2:20 compares the great professing mass called Christendom to "a great house" holding a mixed collection of the precious and the vile. So it is not only the immoral and the wicked who are lost, but many religious people too. You may find perishing souls in both the tavern and the "place of worship."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Lamp, broom, and a careful search

She lights, sweeps, and searches. Each act pictures a stage in how God reaches a person.

The lamp being lit speaks of testimony. Sweeping the house reminds us of spreading the gospel of grace far and wide. The diligent search is the special care of personal concern for individual souls. How wonderful that the living God gives the Church the great privilege of sharing His care for souls.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A lamp still needs someone to light it — and silver says something about what the lost thing is worth.

So it fits that we now hear of a lamp lit for the search. The lamp is, of course, the Word of God shining in the darkness of the world. Yet the Spirit of God must light it if it is to show where the lost soul is. That soul often lies in corners dark and secret enough, covered with the dust and grime of sin. You would not recognise it at all as having the value it has for God. A lost piece of silver speaks of that value. A lost soul may easily outweigh the whole world gained. In Israel the atonement money was paid in silver, and it is atonement that shows the true value of a soul gained for God — regained, for He is the owner of it all through.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Love that cannot rest

Ten coins, one missing — and the woman turns the whole house over for it.

There is another thing in the second parable: the hard work of this love. It searches eagerly, determined to succeed in finding what was lost. She does everything to get the money. The woman lights the lamp and sweeps the house. She could not stop this task of love — diligent, active love — until she found the piece. It was her affair and her interest again, because the money was hers.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

From that everyday care the parable reasons upward:

What diligence and hard work for one coin worth eightpence! In ordinary life the shepherd could care that much for his sheep, and the woman that much for her coin — called in the original a drachma. If they could be so concerned, was it surprising that the Lord should care for sinners? They are immortal creatures, of far more value than a drachma or a sheep.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Lost. The coin cannot stray and cannot return; it pictures a soul with no power in itself to come back to God.

- Owned. The silver was hers before it was missing, and that ownership is why she will not let the loss stand.

- Lit. The lamp is the Word of God, and the Spirit of God must light it before it shows where the lost soul lies.

- Swept. The search is thorough and personal — the whole house turned over for one piece.

- Found. She stops only "until she finds it," and the worth of one soul is what makes such effort reasonable.

Luke 15:9 · Darby

and having found it she calls together the friends and neighbours, saying, Rejoice with me, for I have found the drachma which I had lost.

The woman finds her lost coin, and her first move is to gather people to be glad with her. Why does her joy need company, and whose joy is it in the end?

The Joy Is the Argument

Jesus answers His critics with a picture of gladness. One writer asks how anyone standing nearby could resent a woman's delight over her recovered coin:

Would his neighbours, do you think, complain at the shepherd's joy over his lost sheep now found by him? Or would the woman's friends resent her pleasure as she swept her piece of money into her lap? So it is with God. It is His own joy in the salvation of sinners that Jesus offers as His warrant and His defence. Hold this thought deeply: the gospel of our peace is a spring of joy to Him Who planned and accomplished it. Our God has done nothing less than lay the scene of His own happiness in our salvation, as these parables show us.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

"The Coin That I Had Lost"

She calls the coin hers. What makes it matter is not what it can do:

The piece of money, like the sheep, could do nothing. It was the joy of those who had lost them to get them back again, because they valued them. Worthless in one sense, yet to God's love the sinner is immensely valuable.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Who the Woman Is

Commentators differ here. One writer sets the two readings side by side:

Stier and Alford have followed Bengel in treating the woman as a symbol of the Holy Spirit, the Hebrew word for which is feminine. Maclaren, however, observes that "the owner should be the seeker … Jesus." The mention of "friends and neighbors" seems to support this.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A third writer holds the two together:

The woman is not a picture of the Spirit, but of the Church of God, in which the power of the Spirit works to seek the lost. It is wonderful that the Church has the great privilege of sharing with the living God in His care for souls, and in His joy over the repentance of the lost… The woman also expected others to rejoice with her in finding the silver.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Shared Within the Godhead

The shared joy in this chapter goes back further than the woman's friends:

In every case — whether it is the Son, or the Father, or the Holy Spirit — there is communion. Here that joy spreads to everyone who enters into the mind of God. So there is real delight on every side. Each Person of the Godhead has His own fitting place and part in the wonderful work of redemption. Beyond that, there is deep divine joy in the result of redemption.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer takes the detail further, matching each "Rejoice with me" to a Person of the Godhead:

One has suggested that this may refer to the Father and the Holy Spirit rejoicing in the work of the Son in verse 6. In verse 9 the Father and the Son rejoice in the work of the Spirit. "Let us eat and celebrate" (verse 23) would be Father, Son and Holy Spirit rejoicing together. God does bring us into a joy of our own. But these verses seem to point to the distinct joy of the Persons in the Godhead over the recovery of man for Their pleasure.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Joy That Spreads

This joy does not stay where it starts. It grows as it travels:

And the joy of the Holy Spirit — will He not make it felt in the hearts of His people? He must have "friends" to share it with. It spreads, multiplying itself as it travels from heart to heart, the way a fire grows with fresh fuel.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Value — The coin could not find itself. It mattered because it belonged to her, and that is the sinner's worth to God's love.

- Finding — She does not announce a search. She announces a result: what was lost is hers again.

- Sharing — Her first act after finding is to gather people. Joy like this looks for company.

- Communion — Father, Son and Spirit each have a part in this work. Each shares the gladness the others bring.

- Overflow — The Spirit gives the same joy to His people. It spreads from heart to heart, like fire given fresh fuel.

Luke 15:10 · Darby

Thus, I say unto you, there is joy before the angels of God for one repenting sinner.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Luke 15:11 · Darby

And he said, A certain man had two sons;

Luke 15 opens with religious leaders complaining that Jesus welcomes tax collectors and sinners. He answers with three pictures of something lost and found, and the third begins here — with a man, two sons, and a home one of them will leave.

Why the Lord Told a Third Story

The first two stories used a straying sheep and a lost coin. Neither could show what happens inside a person.

The Saviour adds a third parable to complete and confirm the truth of God's grace in saving the lost who repent. The first showed the sinner carelessly straying by his own act. The second showed him dead and unfeeling until the Spirit works through the living word. The third uses the figure, not of a sheep or a coin, but of a man. It points to a work done inside the conscience, and to the welcome the returning soul finds in the Father's love and in the privileges of grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Lord tells the three as one story, and each part shows a different Person at work.

But in blessed contrast with man's awful condition, we get the activity of God — the Son, the Spirit, and the Father. The Son seeks the lost sheep. The Spirit frees the wanderer from the death that lies upon him. The Father receives the lost one when he comes back. We have there not three parables, but one. "He told them this parable," it says. Why? Because He was bringing out the activity of the love of God to man, the lost sinner.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A Man, Because Man Has a Conscience

A sheep and a coin have no mind of their own. A man does.

Now in the third parable we have the effect produced. The work is not only conversion or pardon. Nothing done in this way would be enough without the full bringing of the soul to God, and into fellowship with Him too — the new and close relationship of a son by grace. This is what the third parable sets forth. And so it is no longer a sheep or a coin, but a man. It is there that we find intelligence and conscience, and so much the more guilt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

This is not one man's story only.

So the parable of the lost son takes man from the very start. It traces the beginning of his leaving, then the course and character of a sinner's misery on the earth, then his repentance, then his final peace and joy in the presence of God — who Himself rejoices as truly as man objects. In practice this is true of every sinner. It begins with a little yielding to sin, or a wish to be independent of God, and in every person's history the evil goes deeper and deeper.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Sons, Two Kinds of People

The word "sons" here does not mean these two are believers. It rests on a wider tie — that every human being comes from God.

In verse 11 the two sons of a certain man do not picture true believers as sons of God. They picture those who by creation are God's offspring (Acts 17:28). In the younger son we see the tax collectors and sinners of verse 1. In the elder son we see the self-righteous Pharisees... The elder son's nearness to his father was only outward, just as was that of the Pharisees in relation to God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer names the two classes these sons stand for, and traces the wandering back to the first man.

The Saviour now pictures two sons — one wasteful, the other self-righteous (Luke 15:11-32). These represent the lawless and the religious classes... In the same way most men live with no regard at all for Him whose offspring they are. They squander His rich gifts — health, money, and abilities — on their own desires. The first man aimed at independence of God, and the love of this has marked all his descendants since.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Complaint Answered

Both sons want their own way, and that exposes the objectors as much as the wanderer.

This is man, all men, without exception. Every man desires to have his own way. In this the self-righteous Pharisee is quite as determined as the sinner. The elder son disputes his father's right to receive the repentant prodigal. God's ways, whether in grace or in judgment, never please the natural man.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Summary

- One parable. The sheep, the coin and the son are not three lessons but one — the Son seeking, the Spirit working, the Father receiving.

- A man, not a coin. The third picture swaps the sheep and the coin for a person. Only a person has a conscience, and only there can the work go inward.

- Two sons. Both are God's offspring by creation. One wastes everything openly. The other stays near, but only on the outside.

- One root. The wish to be independent of God is what makes both of them alike, and it is where every sinner's history starts.

- One end. The story runs the whole distance. It goes from the first step away, through the misery, to full fellowship with God as a son by grace.

Luke 15:12 · Darby

and the younger of them said to his father, Father, give to me the share of the property that falls [to me]. And he divided to them what he was possessed of.

This chapter tells three stories: a lost sheep, a lost coin, and a son who leaves home on purpose. The third one opens before any wild living, with what the son asks his father. Everything that follows — the far country, the pigs — traces back to that one sentence.

The need for a third parable

The first two parables tell of a straying sheep and a lifeless coin. Commentators say a third one is needed, because man's departure from God has a story of its own.

A third parable is necessary. We need not only a strayed sheep and a lost, lifeless piece of money, but also the moral history of man away from the presence of God, and coming to Him again. So the parable of the lost son takes man from the very first. It traces the beginning of his departure. It follows the course and character of a sinner's misery on the earth, his repentance, and his final peace and joy in the presence of God... In other words, there is a little yielding to sin, or a desire to be independent of God. Then comes a further and further depth of evil in every person's history.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The demand is the sin

Nothing scandalous has happened yet. Yet one writer finds the whole essence of sin in these words, before the son spends a penny.

It is the principle of distrust in God, and it results in every form of self-will. I like my own way and not God's. I am determined to have my own will and my own way, whether God wills it or not... This is the very essence of sin, and the root of all other sins. It comes from the unbelieving thought that we can do better for ourselves than God is willing to do for us. So we do not count on Him, we do not wait for Him, but take things into our own hands and follow our own way. "Give me the share of property that is coming to me" is the language of self-will — the worst sin of the prodigal son.

Modernised from Andrew MillerOriginal wording

He wanted the gift, not the Giver

Notice what he asks for: the property, handed over now. He does not ask his father for anything else.

He is not content that his father should keep his portion, but will have it to enjoy himself, independent of the hand from which it comes. It is no surprise that in a little while he would be freer still. The far country is for him an escape from his father's eye, just as the independent portion had been an escape from his father's hand.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The father divides his property

The father agrees without a word of argument. Commentators read that silence as God's way with a responsible creature.

"And he divided his property between them." Man is tested — he is responsible; but in fact he is not stopped from having his way, God only keeping the upper hand for the carrying out of His own gracious purposes. Still, as far as appearances go, God allows a man to do what he pleases. This alone will tell what sin means, what the heart seeks, and what man is with all his pretensions — and the worse the more he pretends.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What he received was no small allowance:

His father richly endowed him with goods. He gave him enough to enable him to make a great and honourable success in life. But he had other plans, and as soon as he got possession he turned his back on his father.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Both sons got a share

The father divides his property between two sons. Commentators link the pair to the two groups listening to Jesus in verse 1.

In the younger son we see the tax collectors and sinners of verse 1, and in the elder son the self-righteous Pharisees. The younger son demanded what he could get, and went far from the father to enjoy it. Yet notice that the father divided his property between the two sons. The elder received his full share, but stayed close to his father, where that share would not be wasted. Yet he had no real heart for his father, let alone for his brother. His nearness to his father was only outward.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Already gone before he left

If the demand is the sin, then the far country only exposes what was already true at the door.

This is simply our history, as men. Whether living in vice or not, we have all turned our backs on God. The son here was far happier, as a man, going from home than returning; he was doing his own will. This is the secret of all sin. The prodigal was just as completely a sinner when he stepped, rich, across his father's doorway. He was no more a sinner later, feeding with the pigs in the far country.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Root. The portion, not the pigsty, is where sin starts — distrust of God working itself out as self-will.

- Portion. He asks for what his father owns, but refuses the hand that holds it. Independence from the hand soon becomes distance from the eye.

- Granted. The father divides his property without argument. God likewise lets a man have his way, keeping the upper hand for His own gracious purposes.

- Both. The elder son received his share too, and he never left. Yet his nearness was only outward. The story divides the crowd into open sinners and respectable ones.

- Exposed. The far country adds nothing to his guilt. It only shows the heart that spoke at the door. The parable then traces that heart all the way home again.

Luke 15:13 · Darby

And after not many days the younger son gathering all together went away into a country a long way off, and there dissipated his property, living in debauchery.

The younger son does not wait once he has his share in hand. Within days he is gone, the money with him — and Luke's few words show why a heart wants distance from God, what it does with His gifts, and what that "freedom" costs.

Eager to be gone

The short delay before he leaves shows what he really wanted. The money mattered, but getting away from his father mattered more.

There was eagerness to get away from his father. As far as his will was concerned, it was a complete abandoning of his father to do his own pleasure. He wished to be so far away that he could act according to his own heart without restraint. There, in a far country, he squanders his property in reckless living. It is the picture of a man left to himself, doing his own will in this world, with ruinous results for the next world as well as this one.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The asking in verse 12 and the journey in verse 13 are two steps of one desire. Each one puts more distance between the son and his father.

He is not content to let his father keep his portion. He will have it for himself, to enjoy independently of the hand it comes from. You do not wonder to learn that in a little while he would be freer still. The far country is his escape from his father's eye, just as the portion in his own hands was an escape from his father's hand.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

What the property stands for

The property he squanders is not just money in a story. It stands for everything a person receives from God.

The "property" that he gets and squanders is his portion in natural things. God has in fact divided it among people. They may use it as answerable to Him who gave it, or perhaps abuse it in complete forgetfulness of Him. The far-off country he seeks puts him at once among the many who habitually turn their backs on God.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Freedom with an owner

Distance from his father felt like liberty. But someone owns the ground he now stands on.

"And there," having reached the far country, he went on cheerfully in his own will as long as he could. He "squandered his property in reckless living." Anyone who lives beyond his means looks rich for a time. In the same way the sinner, wasting his soul, seems happy. But if he thinks himself happy, it is because he has got to a distance from God, where nothing restrains his will. Yet after all he is in the devil's country, and enslaved to him. Liberty of will is just slavery to the devil.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Spending on what cannot satisfy

Money is only the visible part of what a person spends.

So it is with a sinner. You will see one wasting health, talents and energies chasing some bubble that long escapes his grasp. When he reaches it at last, it vanishes from his sight and gives no satisfaction to his craving heart.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

The heart, not the scandal

It is easy to read this verse as being about the disreputable. Several writers press the opposite point — the wild spending was the symptom.

It was not the "reckless living" that made this younger son a prodigal, but the heart that was in him, and God looks at the heart. He asked his father for his share of the property, and his father gave him goods in plenty. He gave him enough to make a great and honourable success of life. But he had other plans. As soon as he had possession, he turned his back on his father. He broke loose from all restraint, travelled far from home, and lived for his own pleasure without any reference to his father's will.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

If that is true, then the journey did not make him worse in kind, only more visible.

When the prodigal left his father's house, he was as wicked as he was later. He was glad to get away from his father and do his own will... When he crossed his father's doorstep he was as guilty as when he was eating husks in the far country — only not as degraded.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Distance wanted. The gap between verse 12 and verse 13 is short because the will was already set. First he escapes his father's hand, then his father's eye.

- Distance funded. What he carries away is a trust. God divides natural gifts among people. Each person answers to the Giver for them, or forgets Him and wastes them.

- Distance enjoyed. Away from restraint the sinner looks rich and feels free. But the far country has an owner, and liberty of will is slavery to the devil.

- Distance emptied. He pours out health, talents and energy chasing a bubble. It vanishes when he catches it, and his heart still craves.

- Distance exposed. The wild living did not create the prodigal. The heart did. He was as guilty stepping over his father's doorstep as he was later, eating husks in the far country.

Luke 15:14 · Darby

But when he had spent all there arose a violent famine throughout that country, and he began to be in want.

The younger son's money runs out, and at the very same moment the country he chose runs dry. Commentators press one question here: does hunger by itself bring a person back to God?

The bitter end of a chosen path

This is the second half of a story the son started himself.

It is the picture of a man left to himself, doing his own will in this world. The ruin runs on into the next world as well as this one. "And when he had spent everything, a severe famine arose in that country, and he began to be in need." Again this is the picture. It shows not only the active course of sin, but its bitter results. Sin indulged in brings misery and want. There is a void that nothing can satisfy, and the selfish waste of all means only makes this felt more in the end.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The only place that could supply him

His want was not bad luck. It followed from his own choice.

He had left the only place where all his need could be supplied — his father's house. He had treated his portion and his father's as two separate things. So he had to learn that his own could run out. We can get to the bottom of all human circumstances and resources. Every cup of human or earthly happiness, however deep and however full of good things, can be drained to the bottom.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Famine in the land, not just his pocket

Notice what the verse says arose: a famine over the whole country.

He has spent everything, and then a severe famine arises in the land. It is not only that his own resources are at an end; the whole land of his choice is stripped and empty. This comes true for us when we have not only lost what was our own. We also come to find that in all the world there is nothing to supply ourselves from. This is not just our own experience, unusual as ours might seem; the cry of want is everywhere. How can we even beg from beggars?

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The famine touches more than the ruined. It shows in the effort people put into staying entertained.

There is in many a heart the sense that there is a famine in the world. Why are there so many concerts and great exhibitions? Because of the famine. They try to keep their spirits up, to do without God, but it is all in vain; they cannot. They would not have to take such pains to make themselves happy if they really were happy.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Want, not yet repentance

The verse says he began to be in need. The story does not turn homeward here.

He "began to be in need," but his will was not touched yet, as we shall see shortly. Many a heart is uneasy in the world, but that alone never brings anyone back to God... A man of the world says you must have everything the world holds to know that the world can never satisfy you. But knowing that the whole world cannot satisfy would never turn a man to God. He must know more — that he is perishing; not merely unsatisfied, but ruined.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Where God begins

Commentators differ on how much weight to give this moment. Some read it only as the low point of the descent; others see God already at work in it, making a man willing.

Take the prodigal, for instance. When he was brought to his last penny and began to be in want, he came to himself. This was the beginning of the compelling, when the poor prodigal opened his eyes to his condition... The Holy Spirit makes you willing when He makes you see your need.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Where the parable stops, and where the gospel goes on

The same emptiness can be a beginning — and the parable points beyond itself for the rest.

"He began to be in need" — the experience sooner or later of every sinner... It is a blessed beginning when it throws us on the boundless love and infinite resources of the God of all grace... This parable does not tell us how all this is done in righteousness. We learn that elsewhere. Christ suffered, the Just for the unjust, to bring us to God. The forgiveness of sins and eternal blessing are for His sake and in Him.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Spent. He left the one place that could supply his every need. Every other cup runs dry.

- Famine. His pocket was empty and so was the whole country — you cannot beg from beggars.

- Want. The cry of want is everywhere, and the pains people take to stay happy prove they are not.

- Willing. Want alone does not turn a heart to God; a man must learn he is not just unsatisfied but perishing.

- Welcome. Want becomes a blessed beginning when it throws a man on God's boundless love. Christ suffered, the Just for the unjust, to bring us to God.

Luke 15:15 · Darby

And he went and joined himself to one of the citizens of that country, and he sent him into his fields to feed swine.

The young man has spent everything, and a famine has struck. Instead of going home, he ties himself to a stranger and ends up feeding pigs.

(The writers below quote an older translation, which reads "joined himself to a citizen of that country.")

Why Hunger Did Not Send Him Home

Need did not send him back to his father. It sent him deeper into the country that had already ruined him.

When the famine came, he began to be in want. That never turns the heart to God. Instead he joined himself to a citizen of that country, and was sent into his fields to feed pigs. Drinking and pleasure and excitement did not satisfy, and no one gave to him. There is no giving there; there is selling oneself. When the heart is away from God, want never turns it to Him, but to whatever satisfies the flesh.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The reason is simple: a man who still has another option will not think of home.

But the prodigal "began to be in want." And what then? Did he think of the father? No. As long as he had any other resource, he would not think of returning home. So he joined himself to a citizen of that country instead. This was terrible. This is how Satan crushes those who serve him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Who The Citizen Is

This man belongs to the far country in a way the son never did.

Then he goes and joins himself to a citizen of that far-off land — one who belongs to it as, in this story, even the prodigal did not. Men have come into this condition, but they are not looked on as hopelessly caught in it. Elsewhere there is a Father's heart that travels after them; there is the step of One who goes after what is lost. But the citizen of that far-off land has no ties — not even, one may say, broken ties elsewhere. The devil is certainly such a citizen. The herd he is feeding and fattening for destruction speaks plainly about him.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

And this employer offers no kindness in return for service.

That certain citizen is the devil. Who ever found any pity in the devil's heart? He disguises himself as an angel of light, as the Bible says he does, but there is no mercy in him. He is "a murderer from the beginning." Yet as surely as a man runs from God, he runs into the arms of the devil.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Not A Fellow Citizen, But A Slave

He asked for a place. He received a chain.

Now we see the sinner's degradation, because love is not there; self is. The citizen does not treat him as a fellow citizen, but as a slave. There is no slavery so deep or so degrading as the slavery of our own desires. So he is treated as a slave: sent into the fields to feed pigs. How must that have sounded to a Jewish ear?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Masters Only

The picture is not limited to one runaway son.

Everyone who is not walking in communion with God and in subjection to the gospel of Christ is serving Satan in this way. There is no middle ground. Reader, who are you serving? Are you serving Christ or Satan?

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Real Guilt

Yet the swine field is not where the sin began. It is only where the sin arrived.

He was brought to a sense of his guilt; and what was it? Feeding with the pigs? No, that was the fruit of it. His guilt was in leaving his father's house, turning away from God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Mercy in the Failure

The service fails — and one writer stops to thank God for that.

A sad picture of Satan's service: waiting on men who are wholly given up to their own desires, longing even to be as they are. Thank God, it is all in vain. That failure is simply His mercy and the door of hope.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Want. Emptiness by itself does not send anyone to God; the son's hunger drove him further into the far country, not out of it.

- Attachment. Instead of going home, he joined himself to a citizen of that land. Commentators identify that citizen as the devil, who belongs there and has no ties anywhere else.

- Slavery. The citizen does not receive him as an equal; he uses him as a slave. No bondage is deeper than bondage to your own desires.

- Alternative. There is no third option: a person is either walking with God or in the service of Satan.

- Mercy. The guilt was the leaving, not the pig field. And the pig field satisfies nobody — that emptiness is God's mercy and the door of hope.

Luke 15:16 · Darby

And he longed to fill his belly with the husks which the swine were eating; and no one gave to him.

The younger son has spent everything, and a famine has stripped the far country bare. Now he stands in a field of pigs, so hungry that their food looks good to him. This verse is the floor of his fall — and, commentators say, the place where hope can begin.

What the pods were

One writer explains what these pods were, and where the real sting of the scene lies.

The pigs had food — the fruit of the carob, or locust tree. It was food for pigs, and only the poorest people ate it. The pigs had enough; he had not. He could not even add the husks, or pods, of that tree to his own small share, much as he wanted to. The reason given is this: no one gave him anything. The pigs had everything they needed, but no one cared for him.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The depth of the fall

One writer points to what the son has really become in that field.

He went and joined himself to one of the citizens of that country; and he sent him into his fields to feed pigs. Now we find the sinner's degradation; for love is not there, but self is. The citizen does not treat him as a fellow-citizen, but as a slave. There is no slavery so deep or degrading as that of our own lusts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"No one gave him anything"

The verse ends with a flat statement: no one gave him anything. One writer turns that into a rule about the country the son chose.

There is no giving in the "far country," not even of husks. Satan sells all, and dearly — our souls are the price. You must buy everything. The world's principle is "nothing for nothing"; everything must bring its price. Your gratifications there must be bought at the cost of reputation and soul. If you sell yourself to the devil, you will get husks: he will never give you anything. If you want to find a giver, you must come to God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Kelly holds the same fact up against God's character.

He has sunk to the lowest depth of want and misery; yet no one gives to him. God is the giver, man grudgingly pays his debts, if he pays them: never to God, only half-heartedly to man. But no one gives: so the prodigal found.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why emptiness alone is not enough

Hunger has not taken him home yet. It has taken him deeper into the far country, down to the pig field. One writer explains why.

He "began to be in want"; but his will was not touched yet. Many a heart is not easy in the world; but that alone never brings anyone back to God. Very few people reach a certain age without having "begun to be in want." But then they go looking for satisfaction in pleasure or in vice — in one thing or another, it does not matter what — and last of all in God. A man of the world says you must have everything the world offers to know that the world can never satisfy you. But knowing that the whole world cannot satisfy would never turn a man to God. He must know more — that he is perishing; not merely unsatisfied, but ruined.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The mercy hidden in a longing that fails

If the pigs had shared, the story might have ended in that field. One writer treats the failure of his craving as God's kindness — the very thing that leaves a door open.

A sad picture of Satan's service — waiting on men who are wholly given up to their own lusts, and longing even to be like them. Thank God, that longing is in vain. This is simply His mercy, and the door of hope.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

One writer asks why the Lord drew the picture this low.

In this last of the three parables the Lord follows the sinner all the way down to his lowest degradation: eating husks with the pigs. We should remember here what pigs meant to the people He was speaking to. And he is there by his own choice. Why was the picture drawn like this? To show that nothing could put the sinner beyond the reach of grace.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Pods. Carob pods were pig food, eaten only by the very poorest; the pigs had enough, the son had none.

- Slavery. He asked for freedom and got a master: no slavery is deeper than the slavery of our own lusts.

- No giving. The far country sells and never gives; if you want a giver, you must go to God.

- Not enough. Emptiness alone drives a man further out, not home. He must learn that he is perishing, not just unsatisfied.

- Mercy. No one filled his craving. That failure is the door of hope: nothing puts a sinner past the reach of grace.

Luke 15:17 · Darby

And coming to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have abundance of bread, and *I* perish here by famine.

The turning point of this parable is a thought, not a rescue party. A starving young man, feeding pigs in a far country, remembers his father's house — so what happened inside him, and who caused it?

Coming to His Senses

The phrase describes a man returning to sanity, not just to sorrow. One writer calls the slavery of sin itself a madness, and says God uses the misery it brings.

Oh, the dreadful slavery of sin! What wretchedness! And no man can give relief. And yet this very wretchedness and self-loathing is what God is using to bring this poor prodigal to himself. He came to himself. Yes — is not the slavery of sin, rushing wilfully, madly, to certain everlasting misery, is it not madness?

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Another writer finds the signs of that madness in the details of the story.

The prodigal had shown quite a few signs of an unsound mind. First, he was a servant of swine; yet, being a Jew, he should have despised swine as unclean. God has passed His sentence on swine. This insane young man was setting his own opinion against God's, in a practical way.

Modernised from C J DavisOriginal wording

Behind the Change

The son thinks his own thoughts and speaks his own words. One writer points behind them to another cause.

Following the work of Christ seen in the shepherd, we have the work of the woman, which pictures the movements of the Spirit of God. The words in verse 17 — "when he came to himself" — would point to the inward effect of the Spirit's work in the heart of the believer. The first movement in any one of us towards God was not from ourselves; there was a complete change from the moment when "he came to himself".

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Another writer marks the order here, and names who stands behind it.

Now the work of God's goodness begins. He comes to himself, before he comes to God. It is God giving him the conviction of his state. So he feels that even those with the lowest place in his father's house are well, even amply, provided for compared with him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Discoveries at Once

The verse holds a comparison: plenty in one place, perishing in another. One writer calls that double sight the point every conscience must reach.

When he comes to himself, he says the servants have more than enough bread, while he perishes with hunger. There is goodness in God, and badness in me. However wise and clever a man may be, no work of conscience has begun until he reaches that point. And without that, there is no real work at all: There is goodness in God, and badness in me.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What moves him is more than hunger.

"When he came to himself," there is a total change. He was like a madman before, identified with the place where the famine was. The goodness of God comes into his heart. It is not, I shall get it, or, How will I be received? But the sense of goodness is awakened in the soul, and this produces a want of another kind — a sense of the blessedness of God!

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Hunger as the Teacher

He learns nothing by reasoning. He learns by starving — and that, one writer argues, is how God is found.

Wisdom and philosophy never found out God. He makes Himself known to us through our need; necessity finds Him out. Who is it that really discovers the value of bread? The chemist? No; a hungry man. The sinner's heart — yes, and the saint's heart too — is put in its right place in this way.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The One Thing He Still Gets Wrong

His plan is to come back on wages, as one of the hired men. Commentators point out that the category he wants to enter does not exist at that house.

He says, "How many of my father's hired servants have more than enough bread!" And there is not even one hired servant in his father's house!... But in His house He has only children at His table: as it was said of the passover-feast, the type of it, "No foreigner or hired servant may eat of it." (Ex. 12:45.)

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

His turning is real, though his plan is wrong. The father overrules it.

He is brought to a sense of his guilt; and what was it? Feeding with the swine? No, that was the fruit of it; his guilt was in leaving his father's house, turning away from God... But the father does not give him time for that. We hear nothing more about hired servants.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Madness. Coming to himself means recovering his reason. The far country was a form of madness, and hunger broke it.

- Movement. The first step home was not his own. Writers call it the inward work of the Spirit, giving him conviction of his state.

- Measurement. He sees two things in one glance: goodness in God, ruin in himself. Until a person reaches that, no real work has begun.

- Meal. Need, not cleverness, discovers God — a hungry man knows the worth of bread better than a chemist does.

- Mistake. He plans to return as a hired servant. His father's house has no such position, and the father never lets him finish the offer.

Luke 15:18 · Darby

I will rise up and go to my father, and I will say to him, Father, I have sinned against heaven and before thee;

The younger son has spent everything, and hunger has driven him to think about home. Here he makes up his mind. He will get up, go back, and speak first about his sin. The words he plans tell us what repentance is.

"I will arise and go"

The son is still in the far country when he says this. Nothing has changed in his circumstances. What has changed is the direction of his heart. One writer treats that turn as the decisive thing.

His conscience wakes up, but his heart is drawn: "I will arise and go to my father." That is everything. He had turned his back on his father and left God behind him. He has not reached his father yet. But he has turned his face towards him, and his heart too, and that is an immense thing! He has not peace yet; but it is an immense thing when God and the soul meet.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A note on this verse quotes another writer's summary:

Repentance is the sinner's return to the Father. … Faith makes the return possible.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "against heaven" means

Is "heaven" here just another word for God? One writer answers that the son names two different things.

Heaven is God's throne, and earth is His footstool. So we can easily see why that highest place of divine glory is tied to every thought of purity, love, and worship. But heaven is not the same as God. The son names heaven as the spotless seat of His honour, set against this earth that man's will and sin and lusts have defiled. Then he names someone else: "you," "Father."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Heaven is the place our sin offended. So it is the last place we would expect salvation to come from.

Who would have thought that our salvation would come from heaven? That is the last place we would have expected it from, because heaven is what we had sinned against. "Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you," cried the repentant prodigal, and that is true of us all. Our sins were an insult to God's majesty, a challenge to His supremacy, and a proof that we hated Him. We might have expected judgment from heaven — wrath, fire, and brimstone — but not love and salvation.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Repentance: self-judgment, not regret

He does not plan to explain himself or make excuses. He plans to name his sin to the one he sinned against.

Repentance implies self-judgment in the presence of God. It is a change of mind about myself, about others, and about God. It is a change that humbles me in the dust and puts me in my true and proper place before Him. I say then, like the prodigal, "I have sinned against heaven and before you, and am no more worthy to be called your son."

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Saying "Father" — and finding out who He is

Notice the first word of his planned speech. He calls the one he wronged "Father." One writer calls that open confession the high point of a person's life.

"I have sinned," said the prodigal. Have you known the moment when you found that you have sinned? When you found that you were undone, and lost, and naked? When you went down before God with the words, "Father, I have sinned"? I call this the grandest moment of a sinner's experience on earth, when he gets before God, and finds out — what? That the One he has offended and sinned against, the One he thought was against him, is for him. He is waiting in grace to receive him. He is on his side.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A real turning, with limited knowledge

His resolve is real, but he still knows little of his father's goodness. One writer sees the same mix in Peter.

He knew that there was goodness there, and that it was all over with him where he was. His need, everything, told him he must get back. But he did not yet know how great that goodness was. We see the same thing in Peter (Luke 5); he goes and falls at the feet of Jesus, and says, "Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O Lord!" What an inconsistency! at the knees of Jesus, and yet telling Him to go away!

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Arise — The change starts with a turned will, not better circumstances. His face and heart are toward the father while he is still far off.

- Go — Repentance is the sinner's return to the Father, and faith is what makes that return possible.

- Heaven — Sin offends the seat of God's honour. The wonder is that salvation came from the very heaven we sinned against.

- Father — He confesses to the one he wronged and calls Him Father, and discovers that the offended One is on his side.

- Enough — He knows there is goodness at home, but not yet how much; a true turning can start with a small view of grace.

Luke 15:19 · Darby

I am no longer worthy to be called thy son make me as one of thy hired servants.

Still in the far country, the younger son rehearses his speech. Only half of it survives when he meets his father. What he says about himself is true; what he asks for shows how little he yet knows the one he is going back to.

"I am no longer worthy"

The two halves of his confession do different work. One states the fact; the other passes sentence on himself.

"I will arise and go to my father, and I will say to him, Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you" — that is confession. "And am no longer worthy to be called your son" — that is repentance. He judges himself. That causes joy in heaven, for when man repents heaven rejoices.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What a hired servant was

He asks to be treated as one of the hired servants; older translations put it, "Make me as one of your hired servants." That place was not a lesser room in the family. It was outside the household.

Hired servants were different from the house servants, who were usually slaves. They worked by the day and received their pay at the end of the day. A priest's hired servant did not count as one of the family, and could not eat the holy things. The slaves, though, counted as part of the family.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A speech composed before he met his father

He assumes his father will treat him according to what he has become. That is the mistake.

The last words betray the usual legal state. It is one who thinks God must act according to his condition. Grace never does this. He had wronged his father. He had been guilty of folly, excess, and lewdness. The most he could imagine was his father giving him the lowest place — if he received him at all. He felt that he deserved humiliation. Had he judged more rightly, he would have seen that he deserved much worse.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Humility, or pride in disguise?

Asking to be a hired servant sounds like humility. One writer says it is the opposite.

The prodigal son no doubt thought it would be very humble of him to say, "Make me as one of your hired servants." But this was pride and legality still left in his heart, not humility... The prodigal had no more right to a servant's place than to a son's. He had forfeited all claim on the ground of righteousness. He had only one plea to offer: his pressing need. Only grace could receive him.

Modernised from Andrew MillerOriginal wording

Why a servant's place would not do

The father has his own reasons for refusing the arrangement, and they are not only about the son's comfort.

This "make me as one of your hired servants" will not do for the father, even if it would do for the son. To receive him and treat him like this would be constant misery to the father's heart, and degradation to the son. His very place in the house would be a constant reminder of his sin! Nor would it be a testimony to the servants in the house about the father's love. The father cannot have sons in his house as servants.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same writer says many hearts are still in this state. They lower the standard of what the Father must do to fit what they think they deserve, and would take a servant's place in the house.

The line he never got to say

In front of his father, the confession comes out and the bargain does not.

The prodigal had not yet come to feel that it must be grace or nothing. But the father did not give him time to say, "Make me as one of your hired servants." He let him tell out the confession of his sin, but no more — his father was on his neck, kissing him! How could he say, "Make me a hired servant," when his father was on his neck, making him conscious that he was still a son? The prodigal drew his judgment about his father's heart from what the father actually was to him, and not from any abstract reasoning about it.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Repentance. "I have sinned" is confession. "I am no longer worthy" is repentance — the man passing sentence on himself, while heaven rejoices over it.

- Rehearsal. He drafted the hired-servant plan in the far country, measuring his father's love by his own record.

- False humility. Asking for the lowest place looks humble. But he had no claim to a servant's place either. Only grace could receive him.

- Refusal. A son kept in the house as a hired hand would be a standing memorial of his sin, and no witness to the father's love.

- Interruption. He got out the confession and never reached the bargain. With his father's arms round his neck, his place came from his father, not from his own plan.

Luke 15:20 · Darby

And he rose up and went to his own father. But while he was yet a long way off, his father saw him, and was moved with compassion, and ran, and fell upon his neck, and covered him with kisses.

"He arose and came to his father"

The parable has already shown a son who wasted everything and came to himself in a foreign country. Verse 20 is where the son's journey home meets the father's run.

Everything turns on the word "arose." Plans and regrets are not the same as motion.

"I will arise and go to my father." Many times he may have said, "I ought to go to my father," or, "I must go to my father." But he never reached his father until he actually got up. It took the energy of faith to arise.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

He came without cleaning himself up first, and he came still not knowing what he would find.

There was certainly repentance in the prodigal. He says, "Make me as one of your hired servants." But there was no such thought in God's heart at all, though it is what the prodigal's experiences bring him to. But his father meets him in all his rags. The proofs of his reckless living are on him. Until he met his father, he did not know his father's heart.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"While he was still a long way off"

The distance is not accidental. The same expression described where he had gone to spend his living.

"While he was still a long way off" — the word is the same as the far country — "his father saw him." How keen are the eyes of love! "And felt compassion" — How tender is the heart of love! "and ran" — How swift are the feet of love! "and embraced him and kissed him." Love cannot be held back. He covered him with kisses, for that is the word.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Recognition at that range says something about the one watching.

The father's heart had kept his image. That is why he could recognise him in the distance, coming home so different from the way he had set out. He seems to have been watching for him too. When he saw him, he forgot everything except that this was his son returned... This is a picture of God Himself!

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

"Felt compassion"

The word for compassion has a striking history in the Gospels.

The word translated compassion only occurs in Matthew, Mark and Luke. There are twelve references. It refers eight times to the Lord (Matt. 9:36; Matt. 14:14; Matt. 15:32; Matt. 20:34; Mark 1:41; Mark 6:34; Mark 8:2; Luke 7:13), once in a request made to Him (Mark 9:22), and twice in parables that speak of Him (Matt. 18:27; Luke 10:33). The only other reference is in Luke 15:20, where it refers to the Father.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

"And ran"

Of the two figures in the verse, only one runs.

But his father saw him coming from a great distance and ran to meet him. He embraced him and covered him with kisses before the son had said a word. This is the only indication in Scripture of God running.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The manner of the welcome carries as much weight as the fact of it.

He does not send out a servant to tell the son who went astray to turn aside into one of the outbuildings. He does not send him off to the kitchen, or even shut him up in his own room. No; he himself runs. He lays aside, you might say, his fatherly dignity to show his fatherly love. He is not satisfied with simply taking the wanderer back. He must prove that his whole heart is in the reception.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

"Embraced him and kissed him"

The father says nothing about the past, and it was the father who first moved the son to come.

It is not the son who runs. Even though the son was still a long way off, the father saw him. It was the father who ran, embraced him and kissed him. The son would not have dared to do that, still less would he have expected his father to do so. But grace always surprises the thoughts of men... Not a word about his wicked ways! And yet the father was the one who had worked in secret. He produced in the son the conviction of his own evil and the longing to be in his father's presence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Even a place among the servants was more than he could claim.

The prodigal had no more right to be received as a servant than as a son. He had forfeited all claim on the ground of righteousness. He had only one plea to offer: his pressing need. He could only be met in grace. Had he been met in righteousness, he would have been condemned for ever. But grace reigns; there is no mention of his sins. The question of sin was settled between God and Christ on the cross... Grace steps in first; the Father ran to meet him, embraced him and kissed him. Reconciliation is expressed and accomplished the moment they meet. He receives the kiss of peace at once; grace is free.

Modernised from Andrew MillerOriginal wording

Summary

- Arise — The turning point is not the wish but the movement; many say "I ought to go" and never go.

- Seen — Love's eyes reach the whole distance of the far country. The father knows his son before the son can explain himself.

- Compassion — A word the Gospels use of the Lord again and again. Only here does it describe the Father.

- Ran — The one place Scripture shows God running, and He runs by laying His dignity aside.

- Kissed — Reconciliation is complete the moment they meet, before the son has said a word. Not a word about his sins: the cross settled that question.

Luke 15:21 · Darby

And the son said to him, Father, I have sinned against heaven and before thee; I am no longer worthy to be called thy son.

The son rehearsed a speech in the far country. He delivers it inside his father's embrace — and one line goes missing. What he says names his sin. What he leaves out shows how far grace had already run ahead of him.

"Against heaven and before you"

The son names two parties he has wronged. Why bring heaven into it? One writer keeps heaven and the Father distinct rather than merging them:

Heaven is Jehovah's throne, and earth is His footstool. So we can easily see how that highest region of divine glory is linked with every thought of purity, love, and worship. But heaven is not the same as God Himself. On the contrary, the prodigal names heaven as the unstained seat of His honour, in contrast with this wholly defiled earth of man's will and sin and lusts. Then he marks out someone distinct: "you," "Father."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That address makes the outcome astonishing:

Who would have thought that our salvation would come from heaven? That would be the last place we would expect it from, because it was against heaven that we had sinned. "Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you," cried the penitent prodigal, and that is true of us all. Our sins were a slur on God's majesty, a challenge to His supremacy, and a proof that we hated Him. We might have expected judgment from heaven — wrath, fire, and burning sulfur — but not love and salvation.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

A confession with nothing added

The son's words are short. Notice what he leaves out:

Now it was time for the prodigal to speak. His own need and his father's love made his words direct and short… Here was sincerity and true repentance. He made no excuses; he did not cast the blame on others; he did not even plead for mercy. In that sacred, solemn hour he forgot everyone else. Only his father and himself were left — his sin and his father's love. This is how the sinner comes to God, and love greater than his sin welcomes him.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The line he could not finish

In verse 19 the son planned to ask for a hired servant's place. Here that line never comes — and the reason is the embrace he is standing in:

He was not yet in the full liberty of grace, so he says to himself, "make me as one of your hired servants." He is brought to a sense of his guilt. And what was that guilt? Feeding with the pigs? No, that was the fruit of it. His guilt was in leaving his father's house, turning away from God… But the father does not give him time for that. We hear nothing more about hired servants… He could not have been a servant with the father's arms round his neck.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The change is not that he thinks better of himself. It is that he has stopped setting the terms:

The prodigal comes back to his father, and there is not a word about "Make me as one of your hired servants." What made the difference? His idea of his position now flowed from his father's thoughts, not his own. Why? The father was on his neck, kissing him. It was not a question of what would be, but the settled awareness of what already was.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Grace does not shrink the confession

The father's love did not make the son's sin feel smaller. One writer weighs even the words the son did say, including "no longer worthy to be called your son," and finds them still claiming too much:

It was the father who made the son feel all that was in himself far more deeply, now that the prodigal had come to him. Our Lord leaves the evil unmentioned here. That does not mean the father was indifferent to it… "I have sinned against heaven and before you" was right without question. But it would have been better still if he had said nothing at all about anything he could be worthy or unworthy of. The sad truth was that he was worthy of nothing but chains or death.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Words are not the test

Saying "I have sinned" is not by itself proof of repentance. Scripture records both kinds of speaker:

Many men in Scripture take the place of saying, "I have sinned." It is very remarkable that not all of them get cleansing. David, Nehemiah, Job, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, Micah, the prodigal son, and the thief on the cross all took the place of sinners. They all received cleansing or blessing. But look at Pharaoh, Balaam, Achan, Saul, Shimei, and Judas. These all confess they have sinned, yet they perish… There was no hatred of the sin. There was no desire to turn from it and give it up. There was no true repentance.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Address. Sin is first against heaven, God's throne — and then against the Father the son is speaking to.

- Answer. From that same offended heaven came not fire and wrath but love and salvation.

- Arms. The son confesses inside the embrace, not in exchange for it. The father's welcome comes before the speech.

- Absence. The plan to ask for a servant's place dies unsaid. A son cannot bargain for wages while his father is kissing him.

- Authenticity. The prodigal said "I have sinned" and received blessing. Pharaoh and Judas said the same and perished. The difference is a real turning from the sin.

Luke 15:22 · Darby

But the father said to his bondmen, Bring out the best robe and clothe him in [it], and put a ring on his hand and sandals on his feet;

The son had rehearsed a speech asking for a place among the hired workers, and he never gets to finish it. Before he can ask for the lowest place in the house, the father starts giving orders. Every item ordered is the mark of a son.

A confession cut short

The son's sense of his own unworthiness was accurate, but it did not set the terms of his welcome. Shame stops the words "make me a hired servant" in his throat:

Now, in a different spirit from the one that first prompted it, he can pour out his confession. "Make me a hired servant," he cannot say, for shame. And his rightful admission of unworthiness is cut short by the father's insistent joy. The father orders the best robe brought out and put on him, with a ring for his hand and sandals for his feet. He could never have claimed this, even if he had never wandered. It is his now, because the father delights to have him back.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Welcome is one act of the father's love; clothing him is another:

God shows His love towards us as wretched sinners, but then clothes us with Christ. His love welcomes us while we are still in our rags, but here the same love acts in another way. He brings us into the house as He would have us be there, with His mind expressed about the value of a son. The father's mind was that a son of his was worth it all, and that it was worthy of him to give it. How little worthy it would have been of a father acting in grace to keep him as a servant in the house!

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The best robe, ready before he arrived

The robe raises a question: when was it made ready?

It has been well said that the best robe put on the prodigal was ready in the Father's house before he ever got there. He did not add a single stitch to it. It wrapped him in its folds and gave him entry, fit for the Father's house.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The first clothes God ever made cost a life. One writer hears the gospel in that:

God makes coats of skin and clothes them. Life had to be given up to provide those skins. So from Eden we may hear the gospel preached: "Bring quickly the best robe, and put it on him." The best, the most costly robe, comes through the Lord Jesus Christ giving up His life.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Ring and shoes: relationship and a son's rights

The ring and the sandals are not decoration. The rags come off, and both gifts settle where the son now stands:

He is clothed in "the best robe." Like Joshua the priest in Zechariah 3, off come the filthy garments and on go festival robes. The ring would suggest status and relationship, but lasting for ever: "He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world." The shoes (or sandals) show the full privileges and rights of sonship: "And because you are sons, God has sent the Spirit of His Son into our hearts, crying, 'Abba! Father!' So you are no longer a slave, but a son, and if a son, then an heir through God."

Modernised from Mark BestOriginal wording

The writer quoted earlier says what each gift does:

The ring joins the working hand to God for ever, and the feet are given shoes for the whole road ahead, whatever it may be.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Fit for the house, by the father's standard

Would the son now look out of place among the household servants?

When the prodigal walked into the father's house at his father's side, nothing in that house was more splendid than he was. He was dressed in the best the house could produce. What servant in the house could say he was not fit to be there? But who can tell all that the Father has done, and will yet do, for everyone who believes?

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The servants who carry the robe out

The father gives the robe, but servants fetch it and put it on. One preacher saw his own work in that:

"Bring quickly the best robe," He says to the servants — and that is my part of the work. That is the evangelist's work: to tell you of Christ, and to try to show you how attractive He is. It is to tell you that you have nothing to do, and that Christ has done it all for you. Christ Himself is the best robe. There is the best robe for the worst sinner.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The servants had to know where the robe was kept. That is a challenge to anyone who sets out to help others (George Davison).

Summary

- Cut short. The father's joy, not the son's plan to be a hired servant, decides how he comes home.

- Ready. The best robe was in the house before the son came home, and he added not one stitch to it.

- Costly. Like the skins God made in Eden, the covering required a life given up — Christ Himself is the robe.

- Sonship. Ring and shoes hand him relationship and the full rights of a son, not a hired man's wage.

- Carried out. The father supplies the robe and sends servants to bring it. The evangelist shows Christ, the best robe for the worst sinner.

Luke 15:23 · Darby

and bring the fatted calf and kill it, and let us eat and make merry

The father has already interrupted his son's confession with a robe, a ring and sandals. Now he gives one more order — kill the calf, set the table, and sit down to eat with him.

An animal kept back for one occasion

The calf in the story was not picked at random. Only a well-off household kept one.

Rich people kept a calf ready for any special meal. Abraham presented such a calf, tender and good, to the angels, Genesis 18:7. It is also described as "the fatted calf" in the parable of the Prodigal Son. Luke 15:23.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The best thing in the house had been waiting for this day.

The fatted calf — the thing reserved. The greater the depth to which God goes down in mercy, the greater the height to which His grace will rise. If God has cleared the ground, He occupies it.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

What the calf stands for

Commentators differ here. Most read the killing of the calf as a picture of the death of Christ, on whom the restored son is now fed.

They killed the fatted calf to satisfy his hunger, and so that others too might eat in fellowship with him. The calf pictures Christ, the perfect sacrifice on whom we are privileged to feed, the solid food that gives sustenance and strength. The whole house rejoiced that the son was restored. But the food of that rejoicing is a picture of Christ and Him crucified, for this is the basis of all blessing to mankind.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Turpin, in the passage quoted above, takes it differently — for him the son had already been received and clothed before the calf was mentioned, so the calf is "the sphere of delight in which God places the saved one," not the sacrifice itself. Others tie the calf specifically to the peace offering, the sacrifice that God and the worshipper shared.

The fatted calf would perhaps suggest a peace offering, which, as we know, is the fellowship offering. For the remarkable thing is that we can actually enjoy fellowship with the Father and with the Son, and so enter this circle of holy joy that the words "Let us eat, and be merry" would suggest.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

"Let us eat" — who sits down

The father does not send a plate out to his son. He joins the meal. That small word "us" decides who is at the table.

Who are the "us" here invited to "eat and celebrate"? It is the Father and the returned prodigal son. God says, "I have found My delight in Him, and now you come and find your delight in Him too." So at His own invitation I feed on what the Father feeds on.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The happiest person at the feast

Every word in this verse is the father's. He orders the feast and calls the house to share his gladness.

No doubt it is joy to the sinner to be received, but it is the joy of God to receive him. "It was fitting to celebrate and be glad" — and not merely fitting that the child should be glad to be back in the house. The father is the happy one. The return of the prodigal is joy to heaven, whatever men, whatever Pharisees may think about it.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A feast for now, not only later

The meal is not a preview of heaven kept on hold. It is the son's present share in his father's gladness.

It sets out the joy of God reproducing itself in all who are there. It is not a sketch of what we shall taste when we go to heaven. It is the spirit of heaven made real now on earth, in the worship of those who are brought to God. It is not at all a question of what we were, except to heighten what grace gives and makes us. Everything turns on the excellent efficacy of Christ and the Father's own joy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Joy with no closing line

The story tells us when the rejoicing started. It never tells us when it stopped.

Feasting had to take place, so the fatted calf was to be killed; and throughout the house gladness was to reign. "They began to be merry." But there was no end to it. We learn what caused it, and when it began, but never when it ceased.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Reserved — the household fattened one calf and kept it back for a great day; God's best was ready before the son turned home.

- Killed — most read the slain calf as Christ, the sacrifice the restored sinner now feeds on. Others read it as the sphere of delight God brings him into.

- Shared — "let us eat" puts the father at the same table, feeding on what the son feeds on.

- His joy first — the son's gladness is real, but the father is the happy one; the reasons for the feast are all spoken by him.

- Never ended — the rejoicing starts here on earth, in worship, and Scripture never tells us when it stops.

Luke 15:24 · Darby

for this my son was dead and has come to life, was lost and has been found. And they began to make merry.

The father has just called for the best robe, the ring and the feast, and now he gives his reason. Two questions follow: in what sense was a living young man "dead," and whose joy does this house celebrate?

What "Dead" Means

The father is not describing a burial. Commentators tie the word to the son's whole time away from home.

It may help to see what "dead" really means. The father was not saying that his son had been physically dead and buried, but had been dead to him all the time he was in the far country. So it was with us. We were very much alive in this world — Scripture says we "walked" in it — but quite dead in relation to God, without one movement in our souls towards Him.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

That description is not reserved for the worst people. It is the verdict on the whole race, and it names the very people God offers His favour to.

But who, and what are such? The lost and dead (Luke 15:24). That is the description given us by Him who came to seek and to save the lost (Luke 19:10). How many answer to this? All of Adam's race. By nature, none of his children are morally in any other class. God offers a share in His favour to such people. On the lost and dead He can freely bestow it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Conversion, Not Merely Recovery

Some read the returning son as a believer who has wandered and come back. The wording of this verse rules that out.

Verse 24 proves that this case is one of a lost and ruined soul being brought to God and saved. He was dead, having no spiritual life, but now alive. He was lost, totally away from God, but now found. You could not say these things of a believer who simply needed restoration. "And they began to celebrate." Such joy begins with conversion and goes on for eternity. Eight points describe the conversion of the young man: revived, remembering, resolved, repentant, returning, received, restored, and feasted.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Everything Given Belongs to Grace

The son comes home confessing, with nothing to offer. What he receives is the full outfit of a son.

Grace brings us into the nearer and better relationship of "sons of God by faith in Christ Jesus" (Gal. 3:26). The prodigal only enters this state when he finally comes back to his father, confessing his sins and casting himself upon divine grace. The best robe, the ring on his hand, the shoes on his feet, the fatted calf — all these belong to the relationship of grace, and to nothing else. They belong to the person who is born of God by believing in the name of Jesus. It is God magnifying Himself to the lost.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Calf and the Word "Us"

One small word in the invitation shows who this meal is for.

Christ is the fatted calf of Luke 15. God says, "Bring the fattened calf and kill it, and let us eat and celebrate." Who are the "us" here invited to "eat and celebrate"? It is the Father and the returned prodigal son. God says, I have found my delight in Him, and now do you come and find your delight in Him too. So at His own invitation I feed on what the Father feeds on.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Whose Joy the Feast Celebrates

Once the son is home, the story stops talking about him and starts talking about the father.

When the son comes to the father, you never hear a word about the son — plenty about him while he is coming, but now you hear about the father and his joy in having him. The poor prodigal was happy enough. Yet it is not said to be "fitting to make him happy" — he already had the best robe. What is fitting is to celebrate and be glad, for this son of mine was lost and is found. He tells it to us so that we should know it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Beginning With No End

The chapter sets two "beginnings" against each other.

The wayward and repentant son pictures both in one — he was lost and found, dead and alive again! In the third part we see fullness of joy reached. The once repentant sinner, now clothed in the best robe, stands in his Father's presence and calls Him "Father" in a new way. We are then told, "They began to celebrate!" Earlier it says, "He began to be in need!" That beginning ended when he came to his father, but the other knows no ending.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Dead — not buried, but with no life towards God at all; alive in the world, without a single movement of the soul toward Him.

- Found — this is a soul saved, not a believer tidied up. You cannot say "dead, now alive" of someone who only needed restoring.

- Given — robe, ring, shoes and calf belong to grace alone, and are God making Himself great in the eyes of the lost.

- Shared — the calf is Christ, and the invitation is "let us eat." The Father invites you to delight in what already delights Him.

- Endless — the son's "began to be in need" ended at the father's door; the "began to celebrate" has no ending.

Luke 15:25 · Darby

And his elder son was in the field; and as, coming [up], he drew nigh to the house, he heard music and dancing.

The younger son has come home, and the house is full of joy over him. This verse turns to the other son, who was out in the field while the celebrating began.

The field: near the house, outside the joy

One writer takes "the field" as the clue to the whole man.

"His elder son was in the field." There was joy inside, and he was outside it. "The field" is the place of work. The sincere religious man is always a hard worker. He has a zeal for God, but it is not based on knowledge. He sets out to build a righteousness of his own, so he does not submit to the righteousness of God (Rom. 10:2-3). Like the elder son, he is "near" to the Father's house, but he never gets inside, and he never feels the warmth of the Father's heart.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What the music and dancing were

The word behind "dancing" is worth pausing over, because it says something about the scale of the Father's gladness.

The word there translated "dancing" is the plural of "Choros", which is where our word "Chorus" comes from. It means "a choir, or a band of singers." The Father's heart was so full of joy at receiving back his son, who was lost and is found, that He had to have an abundant, lavish supply of singers. Not one band, but "bands of singers," gathered to sound out the Welcome Home!

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

A sound he could not understand

The sound carries out to him. The meaning does not.

The joy of true Christian worship, of living fellowship in grace, makes no sense to the natural heart. This was the sound that grated on the ears of the elder son... He could grasp debt. He could press a claim of right. He could see failure and pass judgment on it. But he did not hesitate to judge God Himself... His heart was outside his father's home. He did not share the spirit of the love his father was showing to the son who had come back. He was a stranger to grace, so he had no part in all this joy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer points out that he was puzzled before anyone told him about his brother.

It is not that he has heard yet of the return of his brother. It is not that he is simply a stranger to grace. But the sounds themselves are strange to him: "he called one of the servants and asked what these things meant." He is the picture of that joyless, cheerless service which finds nothing in God. Where faith and love are, the soul works surrounded by music, and is never outside the Father's presence.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Who the elder son stands for

Jesus told this parable to men who objected that He ate with sinners. One writer is careful to say who this figure is not.

He is not a self-righteous Christian, any more than the prodigal stands for a believer caught in a sin... But here it is one who would not come in. Every Christian is brought to God. He may not fully enjoy or understand his privileges. But he knows keenly where he falls short, he feels his need of God's mercy, and he is glad when others receive it. Would the Lord describe the Christian as outside the presence of God? So the elder brother here, I have no doubt, stands for those who condemned Jesus for eating with sinners.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Heaven, or here and now

Commentators differ on whether the celebration pictures heaven or the present. One writer gives the elder son's arrival as his reason for placing the scene on earth.

Some will no doubt exclaim, "That is heaven." Not at all. It is here, it is now. It is true of the Christian in this world... But I deny that this scene of joy in the parable means heaven, and I will tell you why. The eldest son was in the field; and when he came to the house, he did not understand the reason of such joy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer points the same words forward, in a warning to a young believer about the world's amusements:

The day is coming when we will have "music and dancing" (Luke 15:25), but it is not down here.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Outside. The elder son is in the field, the place of hard religious work. He is close enough to hear the house, never close enough to feel its warmth.

- Sound. What reaches him is a chorus, bands of singers, the lavish overflow of a Father's gladness over one son who came home.

- Strange. He hears the joy and has to ask what it means; debt, duty and failure he understands, but grace is a foreign language to him.

- Sour. The parable aims at those who complained that Jesus ate with sinners. It does not picture believers who fail, but people who will not come in.

- Inside. The joy is real, present, and near enough to hear from the field. The question the parable leaves open is whether the one outside will come in.

Luke 15:26 · Darby

And having called one of the servants, he inquired what these things might be.

The younger son is inside the house, dressed and welcomed. The older one comes in from work, hears the music, and stops a servant to ask what it means — and that one question shows where his heart has been living.

A Sound He Had Never Heard at Home

The music comes from his own father's house, yet it sounds foreign to him. One commentator says the natural heart cannot make sense of such joy:

The joy of true Christian worship, of living fellowship in grace, is unintelligible to the natural heart. This was what struck the elder son's ears as something repugnant. "And he called one of the servants and asked what these things meant." He could have understood debt. He could have argued for what was right. He could see failure and pass sentence on it. But he did not hesitate to judge God Himself, as we shall see.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Debt, rights and failures are categories he can work with. Gladness over a returned sinner is not.

Near the House, Far from the Father

He has to ask because he does not already know. One writer traces that gap to where he had been:

The elder son spoiled everything for himself by his self-importance. He came back from the field. The field is a picture of the world, and the world can have a religious side too, standing close to God on the outside. He heard music and dancing in the house. He had not been near enough to know the father's joy, so he asked a servant (v.26).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer takes up the field as the place of work:

"The field" is the place of labour. The sincere religionist is always a hard worker. He has a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge... Like the elder son, he is "near" to the Father's house, but he never gets inside, and he never experiences the warmth of the Father's heart.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Servant Who Knew More

He puts his question to a servant. The Greek word behind it means a child:

παῖς, 'a child,' regardless of age, and so used for a servant... Luke 15:26.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One commentator draws out the reversal. The servant had taken in the father's gladness; the son had to have it explained:

The sound of joy reached the elder son's ears. The natural conclusion would have been that he should share in his Father's joy. If his Father was joyful, some blessed thing must have happened. But there was NO real union or sympathy between his Father's heart and his. A selfish mind is not made for joy. The workings of grace are unintelligible to it. He asks a servant boy (pais) what made his Father's house happy, and he was told — told in terms that ought to have awakened every sympathy and every feeling... For the servant boy had caught, and to some degree entered into, the joy of the house.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Work Without Music

His surprise shows what his years of service had been like. One writer sees a religion full of work and empty of joy:

It is not that he has heard yet of his brother's return. It is not that he is simply a stranger to grace. The sounds in themselves are unfamiliar to him. He is the picture of that joyless, cheerless service which finds nothing in God... There is work of a certain kind perhaps in plenty, but it is work in the field only — far off. Such work is no test of piety... And where faith and love are, the soul works surrounded by music, and is never outside the Father's presence.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Whom the Elder Son Pictures

One writer names who this figure stands for:

In the elder son the Lord vividly portrays the self-righteous, those who murmur against grace, such as the Pharisees and scribes. They are many in every age, especially where Scripture is widely available and people boast of religion.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer adds a caution. This figure is not a picture of a Christian at all:

Every Christian is brought to God. He may not fully enjoy or understand his privileges. But he has a keen sense of his shortcomings. He feels his need of divine mercy, and rejoices in that mercy for others. Would the Lord describe the Christian as outside the presence of God?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Field — He worked hard, but "far off." Work like that proves nothing. It kept him outside the very house he worked for.

- Sound — Grace makes a noise the natural heart cannot place. He could handle debt, rights and failure; joy over a rescued sinner was foreign.

- Question — Having to ask what the joy meant was his confession. He had never been close enough to his father to guess.

- Servant — A household boy had caught the father's joy and could explain it. Nearness to the father, not years of service, is what gives understanding.

- Choice — This is not a believer who has stumbled. It is the self-righteous man, who hears grace and still stays outside.

Luke 15:27 · Darby

And he said to him, Thy brother is come, and thy father has killed the fatted calf because he has received him safe and well.

The elder son comes in from the field, hears music in the house, and has to ask a servant what is going on. The answer he gets — a brother home, a calf killed, a father's welcome — is what turns him cold.

The son who had to ask

He lived on the estate, yet the sound of gladness meant nothing to him until someone explained it. One commentator ties this to where he had been and to what his mind could handle:

The natural heart cannot understand the joy of true Christian worship, of living fellowship in grace. That joy struck the elder son's ear as something offensive. "And having called one of the servants, he inquired what these things might be." He could have understood debt. He could have pressed a claim of right. He could see failure and pass judgment on it. But he did not hesitate to judge God Himself... He was a stranger to grace, so he had no part in all this joy. He was pursuing his own things. No doubt he was active and intelligent "in the field," in the world, away from the scene of divine mercy and spiritual joy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two family words

The servant does not say "the runaway" or "that son of his." He uses two family words, and one commentator weighs them:

The servant told him, "Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fattened calf, because he has received him back safe and sound." "Your brother," "your father" — these words should have drawn gentle and kindly feelings from him. Instead, they stirred up opposition at once. He did not care at all about his brother's welfare. He had no part in the shared joy.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The servant is not a neutral messenger. He shares the joy of the house, and his words give the elder son two reasons to share it too:

He asks a servant boy what has made his Father's house happy. The servant tells him — and tells him in words that ought to have awakened every sympathy and every feeling. The words give him a double motive: what he should have felt himself, and what the Father felt, if the Father's mind had been his... For the servant boy had caught, and in some measure entered into, the joy of the house.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"Safe and sound"

The servant's last words are about more than safety. One writer, commenting on a letter that wishes a Christian named Gaius good health, points to where the same word is used:

John expressed his desire for Gaius's well-being. The word translated "be in health" is found in Luke 7:10 and 15:27, where the King James translation renders it "whole" and "safe and sound."

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

What the killed calf means

One writer reads the killed calf as a picture of Christ. Notice who sits down to eat:

Christ is the fattened calf of Luke 15. God says, "Bring the fattened calf and kill it, and let us eat and celebrate." Who are the "us" invited here to "eat and celebrate"? It is the Father and the returned prodigal son. God says, "I have found my delight in Him, and now you come and find your delight in Him too." So at His own invitation I feed on what the Father feeds on.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The reason for the feast

The son had wanted a place among the hired workers. The reason the servant gives for the feast is not the son's plan but the Father's own welcome:

The servants he would have joined were the servants and instruments of God's grace, goodness and bounty. He could not take a place among them as a hired man. This shows how the Father receives the sinner. The welcome does not follow the thoughts awakened in the sinner's heart when he comes to himself. It follows the thoughts of the Father, which rest on His own joy... His shame and his time away were no secret. They were known as the occasion of the Father's joy at his return. The Father goes out to him. First He puts all the honour of His acceptance and joy on him. Then He brings him into the house.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The man left outside

One commentator sees in the elder son a kind of person who has never died out:

In the elder son the Lord paints a sharp picture of the self-righteous, those who murmur against grace, such as the Pharisees and scribes. There are many of them in every age, above all where Scripture is widely known and people boast of religion.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. He is near enough to hear the music and too far off to know what it means. Grace makes no sense to a mind that only counts debt, rights and failure.

- Told. The servant hands him two motives: your brother, and your father — what he should feel, and what his father already feels.

- Whole. "Safe and sound" is a health word — elsewhere in Luke the same word is translated "whole."

- Fed. The killed calf pictures Christ, and the Father invites the returned son to feed on what He Himself delights in.

- Outside. The feast rests on "he has received him" — the Father's joy in the welcome, not the son's own terms. The man who refuses that joy is the only one left outside the house.

Luke 15:28 · Darby

But he became angry and would not go in. And his father went out and besought him.

The house is full of joy because a lost son has come home, and one man stands outside refusing to join in. His refusal turns the parable's spotlight from the son who came home to the brother who never left.

Anger aimed at the father

The elder son is not upset at a stranger. He is upset with his father. That shows how little the two shared.

The elder brother (the self-righteous person) was angry, and would not go in. God had shown what He was in Himself, by His Son, in receiving the lost son. Now He would show what they were in themselves. The elder brother had no communion with his father — for if the father was happy, why was he not happy too? If such a vile person as the tax collector gets in, that makes my righteousness count for nothing! And it is truly so, for where God's happiness is, self-righteousness cannot come.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The insult he meant for his brother landed somewhere else.

Angry with whom? Angry with his father. Why was he so angry with his father? Because he had received back his repentant brother and had not said a word about his sins. He had shown grace and mercy instead of judgment. He may have meant to insult his brother, but in reality it was his father whom he insulted.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

The will behind the refusal

One writer follows the Greek word behind "refused" into other passages. These quotations use an older translation.

For thelo see John 6:67, "Will you also go away?" It is not simply the act, but the will to do it: "Is it your will or disposition?" "Are you also disposed to go away?" In Luke 15:28, "he was angry, and would not go in."

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

The same will splits people into two groups.

The one was hungry and went in; the other was angry and stayed out. The arrival of grace always divides men into these two classes. Some know they are worthy of nothing. Others imagine they are worthy of more than they have got.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Who the elder son pictures

Grace itself is what this man cannot bear.

The joy of grace is unbearable to the self-righteous man. He has no heart for God's goodness to the lost. The scene of joyful communion with the Father stirs up in him fierce opposition to God's way and will... But here it is one who would not come in, while every Christian is brought to God... The elder brother here, I have no doubt, represents those who condemned Jesus for eating with sinners. He stands for the self-righteousness of the Jew in particular, and of anyone who denies grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The type is not tied to one nation or one century.

The Pharisee thinks he has righteousness for God. The elder brother pictures him. You do not need to be a Jew to be a Pharisee. The elder brother is the Pharisee in every age... A Pharisee has no sense of sin, or else he would know he was a sinner; no sense of holiness, or of love.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The father's appeal

The father does not stay inside with the joy. The word for his pleading is a continuous one — he kept it up.

Luke 15:28 — "Besought," or "kept beseeching" (imperfect). Adeney: "There is a Gospel even for the Pharisees."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Nothing shut this son out except his own will.

This elder brother had no door closed in his face. "He was angry, and would not go in." There was no indifference toward him either — quite the opposite: "his father came out and entreated him."

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The cost of staying outside

Every voice in the story catches the father's joy except one, and the parable leaves him where he chose to stand.

Take care that your heart is not turning the love and grace God shows to a fellow sinner into something sour. "He would not go in." The father reasoned with him. He said, "It is your brother come back" — not "my son", but "your brother" (love is high enough for anything). It was all in vain. He could not share the spirit that moved everyone in the house, from the father down to the lowest servant. "He remained outside," and had none of the happiness and none of the joy.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Grace came out to him, and still he would not have it.

The Father went out even to this Pharisee, but nothing could win the self-righteous man.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Anger — The elder son's rage is aimed at his father, not his brother. The father showed mercy instead of judgment.

- Will — "Would not" describes what a man wants, not an accident. He was angry, not hungry, so he stayed out while the starving son went in.

- Mirror — The portrait fits those who condemned Jesus for eating with sinners. It fits the self-righteous man in any age.

- Grace — The father came out and kept pleading. There is good news even for those who resent it, and no one shut the door on him.

- Loss — Nothing could win him. He shut himself out and had none of the joy the whole household shared.

Luke 15:29 · Darby

But he answering said to his father, Behold, so many years I serve thee, and never have I transgressed a commandment of thine; and to me hast thou never given a kid that I might make merry with my friends

"These many years I have served you"

The elder son has heard the music, learned why it is playing, and refuses to go in — and this verse is his answer to a father who came out and pleaded with him. Every word of it is a defence of himself and an accusation against the one he calls neither "father" nor "brother."

The word "served"

One writer points to the word he chose for those years:

"Serve." The verb is δουλεύειν, "to serve as a slave." Compare Hebrews 2:15, which speaks of people held in slavery all their lives.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"I never disobeyed your command"

One writer takes the reply line by line and marks what each claim really shows:

His father comes out in the fullness of love and pleads with him. The son answers with an indignation against divine love that looks pious but is really impious. That kind of feeling belongs to the natural mind and does not shock it. "Look, these many years I have served you" — hollow and wretched service! "And I never disobeyed your command" — the unhappy sinner had no sense of sin! "Yet you never gave me a young goat, that I might celebrate with my friends." So he was bold enough to judge his father, just as the self-righteous man does not shrink from judging God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer meets that boast with a question, then a verdict:

Enough, enough — "I never disobeyed." Could a man with a grain of conscience speak like this? Elder son, loveless brother, stranger to the joys of the Father's house.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

"You never gave me a young goat"

His complaint names what he wanted, and it was not his father's company. That one line puts him closer to his brother than he would admit:

If the younger son pictures the repentant sinner, the elder son is a true picture of the spirit of the Pharisee. The one was hungry and went in; the other was angry and stayed out. When grace arrives it always divides people into these two classes. Some know they are worthy of nothing. Others imagine they are worthy of more than they have got. The elder son said, "You never gave me a young goat, that I might celebrate with my friends." So he too found his company and his pleasure in a circle of friends outside his father's circle. Only the character of the friends differed: the younger son's had a bad name, and his own, we may suppose, were respectable.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

He never once calls him "Father," and even the animal he asks for is smaller than the one killed for his brother:

The younger son had addressed his father, and had done it in a respectful way, saying, "Father." The elder brother spoke to him as well, but in words of reproach, and with no recognition that he was speaking to his father. Surely the contrast between a calf and a young goat was deliberate. A young goat is smaller, and worth far less. He had never had even that, though he said he could count up years of unbroken, faithful service.

after_note: DELETE

C E Stuart

A wage, not a gift

He is not asking for a gift. He believes he has earned one, and that is why he got nothing:

Man's ruin magnifies God's grace. The more deeply a man feels his ruin, the more he values that grace. The elder brother never got a young goat so that he might celebrate with his friends — and why? Because he imagined he had earned it. "Look," he says, "these many years I have served you, and I never disobeyed your command." Vain man! How could he expect the ring, the robe, or the fattened calf? If he had received them, they would have been only the trappings of self-righteousness. They would not have been the ornaments that grace puts on the believing sinner.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Who the elder son pictures

Commentators give the man a name: the Pharisee, who is sure he has the righteousness God requires. That type did not die out with him:

The Pharisee thinks he has righteousness for God; we have that described in the elder brother. You do not need to be a Jew to be a Pharisee — what the Lord calls a whitewashed tomb, full of all uncleanness. The elder brother is the Pharisee in every age; it is the most hateful thing that exists. A Pharisee has no sense of sin, or else he would know he was a sinner; no sense of holiness, or of love. It is the most thorough selfishness, with no thought for anything else. "You never gave me a young goat, that I might celebrate with my friends."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Service. The word behind "I have served you" means slave labour. He lived in his father's house on the footing of a slave.

- Claim. "I never disobeyed" is a sentence no honest conscience could form. It shows a man with no sense of sin at all.

- Complaint. He wanted the young goat for a party with his friends, away from his father. His chosen circle sat outside the father's, just like his brother's.

- Wage. He got nothing because he thought he had earned something. The robe and the calf would only have decorated his self-righteousness.

- Door. The younger son was too hungry to stay out. The elder was too angry to go in. Grace still divides people that way in every age.

Luke 15:30 · Darby

but when this thy son, who has devoured thy substance with harlots, is come, thou hast killed for him the fatted calf.

The elder son has been out in the field, and when he learns why the house is full of music he refuses to join it. This verse is his reply to his father's pleading. It is a charge against his brother, and behind that, against his father's generosity.

The Word He Refused to Say

One word is missing from his complaint: "brother." He also picks his own word for the property.

He does not call the prodigal his brother, but tauntingly "this son of yours." And though it was what the father had given, he calls it "your property." Every time, he puts the worst side forward.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Man Without a Sense of Sin

The charge is loud about someone else's failure and silent about his own. Commentators recognise a familiar religious type in him.

The Pharisee thinks he has righteousness for God; we have that described in the elder brother. You do not need to be a Jew to be a Pharisee — what the Lord speaks of as a whitewashed tomb, full of all uncleanness. The elder brother is the Pharisee in every age; it is the most hateful thing that exists. A Pharisee has no sense of sin, or else he would know that he was a sinner; no sense of holiness, or of love.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Young Goat and the Fatted Calf

His grievance turns on a comparison of two animals. He measures his brother's welcome against the smallest thing he says he never got.

The contrast between a calf and a young goat must have been deliberate — the goat is smaller and worth far less. He had never had even that, though he said he had served for years without a break.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The older brother has nothing to show for those years. His idea of what he had earned explains why.

The elder brother never got a young goat so that he might celebrate with his friends; and why? Because he imagined he had earned it. "Look," he says, "these many years I have served you, and I never disobeyed your command." Vain man! How could he expect the ring, the robe, or the fatted calf? If he had got them, they would have been only the trappings of self-righteousness. They would not have been the ornaments that grace puts on the believing sinner.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Two Kinds of Celebration

He objects to a party in the house while wanting a party of his own. That detail exposes how little distance there is between the two sons.

If the younger son pictures the repentant sinner, the elder son shows the spirit of the Pharisee. The one was hungry and went in; the other was angry and stayed out. The arrival of grace always divides men into two classes. Some know they are worthy of nothing. Others imagine they are worthy of more than they have got. The elder son said, "You never gave me a young goat, that I might celebrate with my friends." So he too found his company and pleasure among friends outside his father's circle. The only difference was in the character of the friends.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Grace Still Comes Out to Him

The father does not answer the accusation with an accusation. He had already left the feast to plead with this son. Commentators apply this to anyone who thinks grace is soft on sin.

Is there anyone who would say that divine grace approves of sin? Let him read his own verdict in the spirit of the elder brother here. Yet let even such a person see how grace speaks to him. "His father came out and entreated him." We see the patience of love toward this wretched man. Love was patient not just with a poor prodigal, but with this one who did not share in the general joy.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where the Parable Leaves Him

The younger son is inside; the older one is still outside, holding his complaint. Commentators note that the parable never shows him crossing the threshold.

The result is that he "would not go in"; he has no part in the Father's joy of grace. He has only satisfaction in himself. He has reproaches for the saved sinner, and insult for the God of all grace and His boundless goodness to "this son of yours."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Wording. He says "this son of yours," not "my brother." He calls what was spent "your property" — each time picking the version that sounds worst.

- Blindness. The complaint has no sense of sin in it; a man who could say he never disobeyed a command shows he does not know himself.

- Arithmetic. He compares a young goat to a fatted calf, and thinks service should have earned him at least the smaller one.

- Friends. He wanted to celebrate outside his father's circle. That puts him nearer his brother's old life than he thinks.

- Outside. Grace came out and pleaded with him. The parable leaves him standing outside — pleased with himself, hard on the forgiven, insulting the Father's goodness.

Luke 15:31 · Darby

But he said to him, Child, *thou* art ever with me, and all that is mine is thine.

The father leaves the party and goes outside to a son who has just accused him of unfairness. His first word is not rebuke but affection. So who is this elder son, and why does he hear such warm words while standing outside in anger?

The Word "Child"

The father says nothing about the long list of services just thrown at him. He reaches instead for the tie that no service created.

The father now speaks, passing over, however, all reference to the claim of unfailing and devoted service. Had the elder brother really done all that he declared, he had only done his duty — nothing more. The silence of the father, therefore, on that point, may be understood. But he speaks — and what does he say? He would make known the proper place and portion of a child. "Child," he said, reminding him of the birth tie, "you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours." To be with the father is the proper place of the child. All that the father has is his.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

He chooses a tender word, and he uses it on a son who has just insulted him.

Truly the patience of God is as wonderful as His love. So the father keeps on: "But he said to him, Child, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours." Nothing can exceed the tender mercy of the father, even toward the unthankful and the evil, the ungrateful and rebellious son.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who The Elder Son Pictures

The elder son is not a stumbling believer. He is the man who resents that God is kind to the undeserving.

The joy of grace is intolerable to the self-righteous man; he has no heart for God's goodness to the lost... Would the Lord describe the Christian as outside the presence of God? So the elder brother here, I have no doubt, represents those who condemned Jesus for eating with sinners. It is the self-righteousness of the Jew in particular, and indeed of anyone who denies grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "All That Is Mine Is Yours" Means

Commentators differ on the exact reference. Some read it of the privileges God gave Israel. Those gifts never took away His freedom to bless others.

The father replies, "Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours." God gave the oracles, the covenants and the promises to the Jews. But He will not give up the right to show His grace to sinners, because of the self-righteous selfishness of the Jews, or of anyone else.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Others read it of the earthly portion the careful man still holds.

Heavenly grace, when it gives the best robe, does not thereby give back lost health, wasted substance, the natural things that may be gone forever. These things still belong to the careful, sensible person, such as the elder son was. The meaning here should be very plain. God would appeal in this way to those who receive daily from His hand, yet are content to live at a practical distance from Him.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

A Nearness That Was Only Outward

The son's own words give him away.

His nearness to his father had been external only. His work had come from some motive other than love. His idea of real happiness was to be away from the father, in the company of his friends. A terrible exposure of the religious man's true state of heart in relation to God.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Spoken From The Father's Side

If the son was never truly near in heart, the sentence still stands — because it describes the father, not the son.

There was no real nearness to the father, then, in this elder son... What remains for us? Surely, as to the younger, so to the elder, it was the father's heart that spoke. From his side, "You are always near me" tells of One who is not distant from His creatures, in whose heart they live near indeed.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Grace That Comes Outside To Plead

The father had to leave the house to say these words.

Is there anyone who would say that divine grace approves of sin? Let him read his own judgment in the spirit of the elder brother here. Yet let even such a man see how grace speaks to him. "So his father came out and entreated him." We see the patience of love toward this wretched man. He is not merely a poor prodigal. He is the one man who had no share in the general joy.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Child. The father answers an insult with a word of relationship, not with a defence of his own fairness. His tender mercy reaches even the ungrateful.

- Comes out. The father leaves his own feast to plead with the one man not celebrating. Grace reaches the self-righteous as well as the ruined.

- Always with me. The son's nearness was outward only. The words still stand, because they speak of a Father who is not distant from His creatures.

- All that is mine. It may mean Israel's covenants and promises, or the earthly portion still in a careful man's hands. Either way, God keeps His right to show grace to sinners.

- Still outside. The parable ends with him refusing to go in. Yet the proper place of a child is with the father.

Luke 15:32 · Darby

But it was right to make merry and rejoice, because this thy brother was dead and has come to life again, and was lost and has been found.

The parable ends outside the house, with the father pleading with the older son who will not come in. His last words give the reason for the party — and hand back the word that son had just refused to use.

"It was fitting" — joy as an obligation

The word behind "fitting" carries the force of what must be done.

This word is often translated "must" and "ought." The father was bound to celebrate when the prodigal son came home.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

That necessity has a mirror image.

It is logically necessary that Heaven should celebrate and be glad when the son who was lost comes home. Yes — if the weeping and wailing of hell are a logical necessity, then the music and gladness of Heaven are just as necessary.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The Father inside His own celebration

The father does not tell the servants to enjoy themselves while he watches. He counts himself in.

"Let us eat and celebrate." It is not, "Let him eat and celebrate." Again he says, "It was fitting that we should celebrate and be glad." There was only one exception to the delight in the house. The elder brother (the self-righteous person) was angry, and would not go in… if the father was happy, why was he not happy too?… If such a vile person as the tax collector gets in, this makes my righteousness go for nothing! It is truly so; for where God's happiness is, self-righteousness cannot come.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

(Older translations read "that we should make merry and be glad" here; the ESV has "to celebrate and be glad.")

One writer draws out what this shows about God:

"It was fitting to celebrate and be glad." Wonderful thought! God Himself delighting in the joy of grace and putting Himself in it along with others.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Your brother" — a tie the father will not let go

The elder son had just said "this son of yours." The father answers by naming the tie his son was trying to drop.

Notice again: "this your brother was dead, and is alive." The words "your brother" matter. God will not in any way allow anyone to deny a proper relationship.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer applies this to family ties in general.

A brother stays a brother, whatever the ups and downs of his affairs, and whatever his ways are like. In the parable, the father reminds the elder son that the prodigal was his brother.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

"Dead… and is alive" — what the words mean

The father is not speaking about a funeral. He is describing where his son stood in relation to him.

The father was not saying that his son had been physically dead and buried. His son had been dead to him all the time he was in the far country. So it was with us. We were very much alive in this world… but quite dead in relation to God, with no movement in our souls towards Him.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

This language also rules something out.

He was dead, having no spiritual life, but now alive. He was lost, totally away from God, but now found. You could not say this about a believer who simply needed restoring.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The son who stayed outside

The two sons picture two kinds of people.

If the younger son pictures the repentant sinner, the elder son accurately represents the spirit of the Pharisee. The one was hungry and went in; the other was angry and stayed out. The arrival of grace always divides people into two classes. Some know they are worthy of nothing. Others imagine they are worthy of more than they have.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One writer states the case the parable makes, and how it ends.

If people in this life would take back someone who had gone wrong — and who could doubt it? — should God be denied the joy of welcoming someone who repents? Here, then, the parable ends. The elder brother is never seen to enter the house; he shuts himself out of it. The prodigal had entered it, never to leave it. Self-righteous people, like the elder brother, were in danger of shutting themselves out of the Father's house. They did not understand how God could show favour to those who truly repent, and delight in them.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Fitting. The joy is not optional. The word means it had to happen. Heaven's music over one sinner coming home is as necessary as hell's weeping over one who is lost.

- Shared. The father says "let us celebrate," not "let him celebrate." God does not host the joy from a distance. He is inside it, delighting in His own grace.

- Brother. The elder son said "this son of yours." The father answers "this your brother." God will not let anyone cancel a relationship He has formed.

- Alive. "Dead" means a soul with no movement towards God, not a body in a grave. It does not describe a believer who has only wandered.

- Outside. One son was too hungry to stay out, the other too angry to go in. The story ends with the door open and the self-righteous man still on the wrong side of it.