Luke 1:5–17

Luke 1:5 · Darby

There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest, by name Zacharias, of the course of Abia, and his wife of the daughters of Aaron, and her name Elizabeth.

Luke's Gospel now names its first date and its first people: a king, a priest, a wife, and a week of temple duty. Every detail here is ordinary. Yet each one reports the state of Israel at the moment God broke a long silence.

How Luke Begins

Luke has told his friend why he writes. Now he starts the story itself, and he starts it plainly.

After this address to his friend, by way of introduction, Luke enters on his subject, great and blessed as it is, with all possible simplicity. Nothing can be more perfect in its season... It is like a simple story being told, a tale of other days, when truth used to be plain and unvarnished. The mind is held for a moment, charmed by the plainness of it — and yet by the skill of the divine hand, which leads the thoughts so gently into the deepest and most wonderful scenes.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Herod the King

The date is not neutral. Who Herod was, and where his family came from, shows how far Israel had fallen.

The Herods came from Idumea, and the Roman government made them rulers in name over Judea and Galilee. The name Idumea is the Greek equivalent of Edom, the land of the descendants of Esau. So the position of the Jews in the days of the Gospels was humiliating in the extreme. They were not only under the rule of the Gentile power at Rome, but a son of Esau ruled over them in the land. This order was not what God announced from the beginning — that, of Jacob and his brother, the "older shall serve the younger" (Gen. 25:23). But through the unfaithfulness of the chosen people, this divine order was reversed for the time, and Esau had the upper hand, though he was an enemy of God and His truth.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Course of Abijah

The phrase points to an arrangement set up long before and still running. Older translations spell Zechariah as "Zacharias."

Ezra restored the courses of the priests and Levites when the people came back from captivity (Ezra 6:18), and we find them still in operation in the New Testament. Zacharias, the father of John the Baptist, was of the course of Abia. This no doubt refers to Abijah, the eighth name listed in 1 Chronicles 24:10. At the end of his service he returned to his house (Luke 1:5, 23). The length of service was a week, beginning from the Sabbath.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Godly People in a Ruined Setting

The public state of things was ruined. That is not the whole picture.

There might be a foreign prince over them — an Edomite — and high priests in strange confusion, as we shall see shortly. Yet for all that, there was a priest properly married to one of the daughters of Aaron: Zacharias, of the course of Abia... The state of Israel was low, and outwardly most irregular. Still, in the middle of it all there were godly ones. The only thing that enabled anyone to walk in such a way in Israel was the faith of the coming Messiah, and this at least had not disappeared. On the contrary, God's Spirit was working in the hearts of a few, preparing them for the One who was coming.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not the Famous Ones

Rank counts for nothing here.

Luke begins by speaking of the priesthood in Israel in the days of Herod. But he passes by the high priest and the other prominent men. He singles out Zacharias, an otherwise very ordinary priest, and his wife Elizabeth, both of the line of Aaron... They had no child and were advanced in age. So they were a fitting picture of Israel's condition of desolation, out of which only the grace of God can bring blessing.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Two Names

The couple's names are not incidental.

For about 400 years the Lord had sent no communication to His people Israel. At last God breaks the silence of heaven... The names of the aged and devout couple are significant. Zacharias means "Jehovah remembers," and Elizabeth means "the oath of God." Join the two together and you have the sentence "Jehovah remembers the oath of God." The time of remembrance had come. Prophecy is about to be fulfilled.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Remembered. Zacharias means "Jehovah remembers" and Elizabeth "the oath of God." Together they spell out what God was about to do after four hundred years of silence.

- Remembered under Herod. The date fixes the low point: an Edomite, a son of Esau, ruling the people he was meant to serve, under Rome.

- Remembered in the temple. Ezra's priestly courses were still turning. Abijah was the eighth, and each course served a week.

- Remembered in a few. In all the disorder, God's Spirit was working in a few. What kept them walking rightly was faith in the coming Messiah.

- Remembered through the overlooked. The high priest gets no mention. Grace starts with an ordinary childless couple, the picture of Israel's desolation.

Luke 1:6 · Darby

And they were both just before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.

Luke's story starts in the temple, with an elderly priest and his wife. Israel was under a foreign ruler and its religious life was in disorder, yet God singles this couple out. What does it mean to call them righteous before God? And in what sense was their walk blameless?

A faithful couple in a ruined day

Israel's public condition was low. Even so, some people still lived godly lives. One commentator names the one thing that made that possible.

Israel's state was low, and on the outside very disordered. Yet in the middle of it all there were godly ones. Only one thing enabled anyone in Israel to walk that way: faith in the coming Messiah. That faith at least had not disappeared. God's Spirit was working in the hearts of a few, preparing them for the One who was coming. Zacharias and Elisabeth were among these few. They were expecting in faith, and where that is real, it gives power to walk rightly. The only souls who walked well, even according to the law, were those who looked beyond the law to Christ. Those who merely rested in the law broke it, though the law might be their boast.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "righteous before God" means here

What kind of righteousness is this? One writer draws a line, then makes it practical.

This is not the righteousness of God that believers have in the Lord Jesus through His work on the cross, which we often speak about. It is practical righteousness. Do we do what is right in the sight of the Lord on a daily basis? … Secondly, Zacharias and Elizabeth walked according to Scripture. They walked in all the commandments and statutes of the Lord. To do this, we need to know God's Word as a whole — not just a few favourite verses — and apply it to our lives. … Thirdly, Zacharias and Elizabeth walked in the fear of the Lord, blameless. That is, they were afraid of doing anything that was displeasing to God. What an example! They did not talk much; they did not have a long sermon prepared for John, their son, to read. No, they walked, which speaks of the life they led.

Modernised from Hansruedi GrafOriginal wording

The word "blameless"

One dictionary traces the word translated "blamelessly" through its other uses.

The word amemptos (from a, "not," and memphomai, "to blame") means "without blame." In his former life Paul had nothing to accuse himself of when it came to the righteousness of the law (Phil. 3:6). Zacharias and his wife were irreproachable (Luke 1:6). The saints too should be irreproachable (Phil. 2:15; 1 Thess. 3:13). Had the first covenant been "faultless," there would have been no place for a second (Heb. 8:7).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Two of a small, hidden company

They were not alone. Luke's opening chapters show a few others of the same character.

This is the lovely picture the Holy Spirit paints, without one wrong stroke: a few people in Jerusalem, in the middle of decay and spiritual death, who "feared the Lord, spoke often to one another, and thought upon His name." They stood outside the activity of the day, and those in power and influence did not know them. But the Lord knew them, and they knew one another. That was enough for their souls. Their hearts were fixed on "the consolation of Israel," "the Lord's Christ." He was enough to satisfy their every desire, and He was the object of all their hopes.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What opened heaven to them

Their obedience was not what brought heaven near. One writer points to what did.

It was not their righteousness that opened heaven to them, but their need and infirmities. Elizabeth was barren, and by now they were both old. Their point of real blessing lay right there — in their sorrow and weakness. For to the barren wife and the childless husband Gabriel comes with a word of promise from heaven.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

A blameless record and a hesitating heart

Soon after this, Zacharias doubted what the angel told him. One writer turns that back on us.

This is the heart of man. It is the heart of even such an honoured man as Zacharias, a man with a remarkable record: "righteous before God, walking blamelessly in all the commandments and statutes of the Lord." And yet he was not willing to take Gabriel at his word! Are we any better? … Only we are worse. It is the word of the Lord God Himself that we so often hesitate to take just as it stands, without a question.

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Faith first. Their blameless walk did not come from law-keeping. It came from looking past the law to the coming Messiah. Those who only rested in the law broke it.

- Then daily life. This righteousness is daily conduct that pleases God. It is not the righteousness believers have through the work of Christ.

- Then a clean record. "Blameless" means there was nothing to accuse them of. The same word shows the first covenant was not faultless, so a second one was needed.

- Hidden but known. They belonged to a small company that the powerful never noticed. Their hearts were fixed on the Lord's Christ, and being known by Him was enough.

- Need opened heaven. Heaven opened to them at the point of their need, not their record. Their barrenness and old age were where the real blessing came in.

Luke 1:7 · Darby

And they had no child, because Elizabeth was barren, and they were both advanced in years.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Luke 1:8 · Darby

And it came to pass, as he fulfilled his priestly service before God in the order of his course,

Luke's Gospel opens with a work roster: a priest reporting for his turn of duty in the temple, in a land ruled by Herod. It reads like an administrative detail, yet this is where heaven breaks in on an ordinary working day.

The Jewish framework

Luke sets the story inside Israel's old order. Herod's reign gives the date, and a priest is the first person we meet.

But we find ourselves at once in a Jewish setting. The Jewish ordinances of the Old Testament, and the thoughts and hopes tied to them, are the frame around this great and solemn event. Herod, king of Judea, gives us the date. The first person we meet on the way is a priest, righteous and blameless, who belongs to one of the twenty-four groups.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What his division was

The divisions worked as a rota. Older translations call a priest's group his "course".

It was the "heads of their fathers' houses" (1 Chronicles 24:4) who served in these priestly courses by turn. They were elders who represented the priesthood, because there were too many priests for all of them to serve in the temple. The work of Zacharias was to burn incense in the temple, where only priests could enter. So he acted as a go-between: the people prayed while he made intercession. This was God's order in Israel, very different from the order now in the Church of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

This rota outlasted the exile.

Ezra restored the courses of the priests and Levites when the people came back from captivity (Ezra 6:18), and we find them still working in the New Testament. Zacharias, the father of John the Baptist, belonged to the course of Abia. This almost certainly means Abijah, the eighth name listed in 1 Chronicles 24:10. When his service ended he went home (Luke 1:5, 23). Each turn of service lasted a week, starting from the Sabbath (2 Chronicles 23:8).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Something real inside a hollow religion

The scene is not a golden age. It is real devotion inside a religion that had mostly gone hollow.

So here at the start we find a distinctly Jewish scene. Zacharias is a priest in one of the courses (the eighth) set up by King David... The godliness of Zacharias and his wife Elisabeth, the seriousness of the priestly service he was carrying out, and the waiting people standing outside — all of this gives a glimpse of the reality that was still left inside a system full of empty formality. The phrase "in the days of Herod the king" points to that: times of lawless indulgence in sin, covered over with an outward show of careful ceremony.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The priesthood itself had not died out.

Luke 1 confirms it. The priesthood had been kept up, and we see a priest serving "before God in the order of his course".

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Daily duty, and a prayer God had not forgotten

Zacharias was doing what his turn required, nothing more. That plain obedience is where God answered a prayer he had lost sight of.

They had prayed about it, as we find later on. Zacharias seems even to have lost sight of his own prayer, but God had not. And so "it came to pass, as he fulfilled his priestly service before God in the order of his course" — for here he was faithful to the demand of daily duty — "it fell to him by lot, according to the custom of the priesthood, to enter into the temple of the LORD to burn incense."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Heaven breaks in on a working day

Nothing announced the change in advance.

The morning breaks, the heavens open, and the dreary wastelands of Israel are visited again. All of this happens in an instant. There are no messengers sent ahead, no wonderful signs of the coming change. The priest is at the usual altar, the people are in their usual places, and life is running its ordinary daily course.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Order. The twenty-four divisions went back to David. Ezra restored them after the exile, and they still ran in Zacharias' day. Each one served a week, Sabbath to Sabbath.

- Office. As priest he stood between God and the people. They prayed outside while he made intercession inside. Grant notes that this was God's order for Israel, and not the order in the Church today.

- Ordinary. He was doing nothing exceptional, only what "daily duty" required of him that week.

- Overlooked. He had prayed for a child and lost sight of the prayer. God had not.

- Opening. Heaven broke in with no warning signs — at the usual altar, in the middle of ordinary life. The real devotion left in a formal system was small, but God met it there.

Luke 1:9 · Darby

it fell to him by lot, according to the custom of the priesthood, to enter into the temple of the Lord to burn incense.

Luke opens his account of the Messiah not in a palace but in temple routine, where an aging priest draws the lot to carry incense into the holy place. The details are small — a turn of duty, a custom, a lot — yet commentators find in them the state of Israel, God's sovereign hand, and a picture of Christ Himself.

An ordinary priest, an ordinary duty

Luke passes over the famous names of the day and settles on an ordinary priest and his wife.

Luke begins by speaking of the priesthood in Israel in the days of Herod. But he passes over the high priest and the other prominent men. He singles out Zacharias, an otherwise very ordinary priest, and his wife Elizabeth. Both came from the priestly line of Aaron, and both were comparatively righteous before God and blameless as far as the law went (v.6). Zacharias means "God has remembered." Elizabeth means "God has sworn." The names fit exactly, because God was about to keep His great promise about the Messiah.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What made him ready for the moment was simply that he was at his post, doing what the day required.

"It came to pass, as he fulfilled his priestly service before God in the order of his course" — for here he was faithful to the requisition of daily duty — "it fell to him by lot, according to the custom of the priesthood, to enter into the temple of the LORD to burn incense."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The lot

The system behind that lot was old and carefully ordered. The task Zacharias drew was the rarest one a priest could get.

David set up the twenty-four courses of the priesthood, as 1 Chronicles 24 records. The course of Abia (or Abijah) was the eighth of them. In the times of the Gospels each course served as priests in the temple of the Lord for one week at a time... On any given day, at both the morning and the evening sacrifice, the priests cast four lots. The lots decided who would prepare the altar, who would kill the sacrifice, who would offer the incense, and who would burn the sacrifice on the altar. The third lot, to offer the incense, was the most coveted and could fall to any priest only once in his lifetime.

Modernised from The True WorshipOriginal wording

Behind what looks like chance, one writer sees a choice made by God.

So Zacharias comes into the temple in the order of his course, and the lot falls to him to burn incense when he goes in. The lot is the expression of the sovereign will of God, which in man's extremity has ever been his resource.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What the incense speaks of

The same writer draws a line between two things the sacrificial system kept distinct — and notes which one comes first in Luke's story.

Incense is the fragrance of Christ to God — perhaps not the fragrance of atonement, but of Christ Himself. And that is what is in view here. Later it becomes clear that atonement must be by His blood... yet in fact, when He did come, the need for His death was kept well in the background... the incense came before the blood, just as it did on the day of atonement.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The timing matters too. The announcement came while that fragrance was rising.

How appropriate that he should be offering incense in the temple at the very time when God announces to him, through an angel, the beginning of the fulfilment of His purposes. The true Priest would appear in the true sanctuary. There He would offer up what will be an eternal fragrance before God — the excellence of His own person.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

"Into the temple of the Lord"

The phrase names an exact spot. One commentator asks whether that spot carries meaning of its own.

Is there not something significant about the place where God sent this message to Zacharias? He stood in the holy place as the priestly remnant, though fruitless as far as Jewish hopes went. This was not like a prophecy announced to the world by an inspired man. "Entering into the temple of the Lord," i.e., the holy place... everything else, even the area holding the altar of burnt sacrifice, is called "outside."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A distance now removed

One man went inside. Everyone else stayed outside. Writers point to how different things are now.

The work of Zacharias was to burn incense in the temple where only priests could enter. So he acted as a go-between: the people prayed while he prayed for them inside. This was God's order in Israel, and it is very different from God's order now in the Church.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The change shows in how far a worshipper may now go in.

When the temple system began, the lot fell to other priests to burn incense, as we see in Luke 1:9... Our privilege, as priests of God, is not only to enter the holy place. We may go right into the holiest of all, through the blood of Jesus, and there we worship before the face of God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Duty. Zacharias was keeping his turn of service, faithful to the daily duty, when God met him.

- Lot. The lot gave him the most prized task a priest could receive. Writers see God's sovereign will behind it.

- Incense. What rose from that altar pictures Christ Himself — His excellence to God, coming before the blood in the order of the story.

- Place. He stood in the holy place as the priestly remnant. The announcement came there, not out to the watching world.

- Access. He went in alone while the people waited outside. That distance is now gone for those who draw near through the blood of Jesus.

Luke 1:10 · Darby

And all the multitude of the people were praying without at the hour of incense.

Luke opens with a scene, not a sermon: a priest burning incense inside, and a praying crowd standing outside. One short line shows how Israel worshipped, and how far the people stood from God.

The word "outside"

The verse turns on where each person stands. One writer asks why it matters that this message came to Zacharias inside the holy place.

Is there not something significant in the place where this message came to Zacharias? He stood as the priestly remnant, but fruitless according to Jewish hopes, in the holy place. It was not like a prophecy sent out by an inspired man to the world. "Entering into the temple of the Lord" means the holy place. It matches "the house" in Solomon's temple proper. The rest, where even the altar of burnt sacrifice stood, is called "without." Taking the circumstances into account, the wording is clear and telling.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Worship measured in degrees of nearness

Those positions were the system. Nearness to God came in ranks, and the crowd stood at the bottom.

To Israel belonged the service of God, but it was a worship of relative nearness to God. The high priest was nearest, and the priests came next. These were inside worshippers. The Levites came after them, attendants on the priests, employed about the tabernacle. Then came the people, who were outside worshippers. As Scripture says, "the whole multitude of the people were praying outside at the hour of incense" (Luke 1:10). But even there, even in the outer court, no Gentile could approach.

Modernised from James L HarrisOriginal wording

A temple says something about the worshipper's position. That is why the heavenly city has none.

A temple speaks of distance between God and the worshipper, whatever privileges of access and worship go with it. That was the case in the temple of the kingdom. The Lord did indeed dwell in it, between the cherubim over the mercy seat. But the worshippers stayed outside while the priest burned incense in the holy place (see Luke 1:10). So we read that there is no temple in the heavenly Jerusalem. Instead, the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. We understand at once that all distance is gone.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

One man prays for many

The people prayed. But they prayed through someone else.

The work of Zacharias was to burn incense in the temple, where only priests could enter. He was therefore an intermediary: the people prayed while he made intercession. This was God's order in Israel, so different from what exists now in the Church of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why prayer and incense belong together

The rising smoke pictured what makes any prayer welcome to God.

What was done at this golden altar also pictures some of the great privileges of believers, the "holy priesthood" of this present age. The wonderful incense pictured the incomparable excellencies of the person and work of our Lord. Prayer and the offering of incense are closely connected (see Psalm 141:2, Luke 1:10, Revelation 8:3). So we are reminded that acceptable prayer and praise must always be in His name and fragrant with Him.

Modernised from H. F. G. ColeOriginal wording

That same pairing reappears later in Scripture, where prayers are answered because of what is added to them.

The incense burnt on the golden altar at the time of prayer (Luke 1:10) symbolised the perfect acceptance of Christ giving power to the people's petitions... from this golden altar of incense the prayers of the remnant for deliverance and judgment rise to God, perfumed with all the fragrance of Christ, and draw down a swift answer.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Faith still alive in a bad time

The crowd outside is evidence, not just background. Under Herod's rule, real faith survived inside a religion mostly gone cold.

All that is best in Judaism comes out here. The godliness of Zacharias and his wife Elisabeth, the seriousness of the priestly service he was doing, the attitude of the waiting people outside — all give a glimpse of the reality still left in the middle of what was full of formalism and emptiness. The phrase "in the days of Herod the king" suggests as much: times of lawless indulgence in sin with an outward show of ceremonial correctness.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The prayer God had not forgotten

The crowd outside was praying. The priest inside had prayed too, long before this day.

They had prayed about it, as we find later. Though Zacharias seems even to have lost sight of his own prayer, yet God had not... "And all the multitude of the people were praying outside at the hour of incense." We have here a full and vivid picture of what was going on then in Israel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The picture repeated

The shape of this moment — one man inside, the rest outside — appears again when Christ ascends.

When the priest Zacharias went into the temple, the whole crowd acknowledged the power of his entrance there. They were outside, praying at the time of incense... So here the risen Son of Man enters within the cloud, as within the veil of the true temple. The people outside acknowledge the power of His ascension there. They look after Him again, and worship.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Outside. The word marks real distance. Only the priest entered the holy place. Everything else, even the altar of sacrifice, counted as "without."

- Ranked. Israel's worship worked in degrees of nearness: high priest, priests, Levites, then the people. No Gentile came even that far.

- Represented. The people prayed while one man interceded inside. That arrangement belonged to Israel, not to the Church.

- Perfumed. Incense pictures the excellence of Christ. Prayer is welcome to God only as it rises with that fragrance.

- Answered. God answered a forgotten prayer in that distant, praying scene. That road ends with no temple and no distance at all.

Luke 1:11 · Darby

And an angel of [the] Lord appeared to him, standing on the right of the altar of incense.

In the temple at Jerusalem an aging priest burns incense while the crowd prays outside. Why does heaven break its long silence at this altar, and why does the angel stand on its right side?

Heaven's long silence broken

The appearance is startling because nothing like it had happened for generations. One writer connects the moment to the meaning hidden in the couple's own names:

For about 400 years the Lord had sent no communication to His people Israel. The silence of heaven is at last broken. Zacharias the priest, serving in the temple, sees the angel Gabriel. He is the same wonderful being who brought heaven's messages to Daniel. The names of the aged and pious couple are significant. Zacharias means "Jehovah remembers." Elizabeth means "the oath of God." Put the two names together and they read: "Jehovah remembers the oath of God." The time of remembrance had come. Prophecy is about to come true.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

That silence had not left God without a people:

It is very beautiful to see how God breaks 400 years of silence. He speaks to Zacharias in the temple about the Forerunner. The curtain lifts, and He lets us see the faithful remnant. There had been such a remnant all through those 400 years.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

An ordinary day of duty

Zacharias was not seeking a vision. He was simply taking his turn of duty in the temple. He had even lost sight of the prayer God was about to answer.

They had prayed for a child, as we find later. Though Zacharias seems even to have lost sight of his own prayer, yet God had not... Here he was faithful to the requirement of daily duty... "And there appeared to him an angel of the Lord standing on the right side of the altar of incense." In this form such a visit was unknown for a long while. It was a gracious intervention of God. This was not just an occasional visit to heal the sicknesses and weaknesses of the people, as we find in another Gospel. It was for the more glorious purpose of announcing the forerunner of the Messiah Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the right side

Where the angel stood carries meaning too:

Zacharias, then, at the incense-altar sees the angel of the Lord. He stands at the right side of the altar — the right hand of power. The power of what the altar speaks of is with him. And his visit, as we see at once, expresses the sweet fragrance of Christ to God.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Incense, prayer, and intercession

The timing of the visit matters as much as the place:

The godly priest had often prayed for this blessing, but until now the answer had been delayed. Now, at the moment of his regular service, Zacharias drew near to burn incense. By the law, that incense was to go up as a sweet fragrance before God — a picture of the Lord's intercession. While the people were praying outside the holy place, the angel of the Lord appears to the priest on the right side of the altar of incense.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same altar points forward beyond Zacharias to a better Priest than he:

How fitting that he should be offering incense in the temple at the very time when God announces to him, through an angel, the first beginnings of the fulfilment of His purposes. Those purposes would be fulfilled when the true Priest appeared in the true sanctuary. There He would offer up an eternal fragrance in the presence of God — the excellence of His own person.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God keeps His own dates

The visit lands at a fixed point in a long-announced schedule, not at random:

Things were low indeed in Judah, the fruit of Israel's sin. But God had not forgotten His promise, and He did not delay keeping it. If He fixes a time, He keeps to it... He announced to Daniel the date from which the weeks of years must run before Messiah the Prince would be cut off. That moment was now near. So Gabriel came to earth again and appeared in the temple, by the altar of incense.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Remembered. The two names together read: "Jehovah remembers the oath of God." After four silent centuries, the time of remembrance had come.

- Preserved. The silence never emptied the land of faith. The temple scene shows a faithful remnant that had been there all along.

- Positioned. The angel stands at the right side — the side of power — because the power of what that altar speaks of is with him.

- Perfumed. Incense went up while the people prayed outside. It pictures the Lord's intercession. It also points on to the true Priest, whose own excellence is an eternal fragrance before God.

- Punctual. God had not forgotten His promise. When He fixes a time, He keeps to it — and Gabriel arrived on the day He had set.

Luke 1:12 · Darby

And Zacharias was troubled, seeing [him], and fear fell upon him.

Heaven had been silent for centuries. Then a priest named Zechariah — older translations call him Zacharias — took his turn of service in the temple and met a messenger from God. His first reaction was not joy but dread. That reaction raises the question of this verse. Why does God's nearness frighten even a good man, and what does God do about that fear?

A long silence broken

Two small details carry the weight here: who the messenger is, and what this couple's names mean.

For about 400 years the Lord had sent no communication to His people Israel. The silence of heaven is at last broken. The serving priest Zacharias sees the angel Gabriel. This is the same wonderful being who brought heaven's messages to Daniel. The names of the aged and pious couple are significant. Zacharias means "Jehovah remembers," and Elizabeth means "the oath of God." If we join them together we have the sentence "Jehovah remembers the oath of God." The time of remembrance had come. Prophecy is about to be fulfilled.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The errand was bigger than the relief God had sometimes sent His people.

A visit like this had been unknown for a long time. It was a gracious intervention of God. It was not merely occasional relief for the healing of sicknesses and weaknesses of the people, as we find in another Gospel. It was for the more glorious purpose of announcing the forerunner of the Messiah Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God's nearness frightens

Zechariah is not unusual here. The same fear comes over anyone who senses that God has come close. The reason lies inside the person, not in the visitor.

He was frightened; so is every man when God gets near to him. Sinner, you will get frightened when you have the sense that God draws near to you. Jacob was afraid when God drew near on the night he was left alone by the river. The shepherds were afraid when God sent the angels to tell them the Saviour was born. Cornelius was afraid. There never was a man yet who was not afraid when the Lord drew near. Conscience tells him — just as conscience told me — that a sinner in his sins is not fit for God.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A godly life that still cannot come close

This man's godliness was outstanding. His terror shows what a life under the law can and cannot produce. One writer sets him beside Mary.

The law does not produce intimacy with God, any more than it produces fruit. Zacharias was an outstandingly godly man, yet when he saw the angel he "was troubled, and fear fell upon him." Finally, the law does not produce confidence; grace alone calls that out. Mary was not only pious, but humble and simple — an object of grace, and not an exponent of the law. "You have found favour with God," said the angel.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Reading God's kindness as a threat

The timing is what stings. God came with the very blessing this couple had long asked for, and dread met Him.

Yet fear falls upon Zacharias. This cannot surprise us. We who belong to God misread His goodness like this far too often. God means us good, and we charge Him with evil. We have not fully learned the lesson of His love, so the fear that brings torment takes hold of us. How often He has to say to us, "Fear not," when He is about to give us perhaps the very blessing we have long sought.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The two words that answer the fear

The angel does not argue with the fear or scold it. He speaks two words, and they are God's own words.

Zacharias had been serving the Lord in the temple, as others, and the angel's visit was a surprise to him. He was not quite prepared for it. Listen to the angel's language: "Fear not." Does the thought of nearness to God awaken alarm in your soul? Very right that it should, in one sense. We are all creatures in revolt against God, but how blessed to see God quieting such alarms! The angel speaks the mind of God: "Fear not." Can your heart let in the comfort of that?

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how much blame to place on Zacharias. Some see a natural reaction to a visit he was not prepared for. Others see the law's failure to give a man confidence before God.

Summary

- Silence. Four centuries passed with no word from heaven. The silence breaks while Zechariah is serving in the temple as usual.

- Sight. The messenger is Gabriel, known already from Daniel. The couple's own names spell out the message: God remembers His oath.

- Fear. Dread is the normal human response when God comes near. Conscience knows that a sinner in his sins is not fit for God.

- Failure. Zechariah's outstanding godliness under the law kept him upright, but it never made him easy with God. Grace calls out confidence; law-keeping never does.

- "Fear not." God quiets the very alarm His nearness caused. He speaks just as He is about to give the blessing long asked for.

Luke 1:13 · Darby

But the angel said to him, Fear not, Zacharias, because thy supplication has been heard, and thy wife Elizabeth shall bear thee a son, and thou shalt call his name John.

An old priest stands alone in the sanctuary, burning incense while the crowd prays outside. Heaven breaks a long silence and speaks his name. The angel's first words answer a fear; the rest answer a prayer the man had almost given up on.

"Do not be afraid"

The angel deals with fear first. Older translations put it "Fear not," and Scripture repeats that word whenever a frail person is called to meet God.

This word is heard above all at those solemn moments when weak, frail human beings of flesh are called to meet God. Even when He reveals Himself only by a mighty angel, a messenger from heaven, the soul He speaks to is deeply troubled. Like Zacharias or Mary, it needs this very comforting word: "Fear not."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A prayer God had not forgotten

Zechariah — the writers below use the older spelling, Zacharias — and his wife carried a sorrow at home. They had taken it to God long before this day.

But they had no child, because Elizabeth was barren, and both were advanced in years. They had prayed about it, as we find later. Though Zacharias seems even to have lost sight of his own prayer, God had not... Was it so strange, after all, that this son should be born beyond nature to this godly couple? No one could have expected such a thing. But once it is announced as God's intention, our hearts see how wise and fitting it is.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The answer is not a substitute for what he asked. It is what he asked, and more.

This, we may suppose, was a prayer he had prayed for a long time. The Lord had a better purpose for Zacharias than his own, though this was indeed an answer to that prayer.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the answer was so slow

Why did God wait so long? The answer to that question came with the news itself.

The answer to his prayer had surely been long in coming. But now the delay was explained, as he learned who his son was to be. God answers prayer at the right time. All may now see the reason for the delay. God's purposes are carried out in His appointed way.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The name carries the message

The family does not choose this child's name. Heaven gives it, and it completes what the parents' names already say. In the quote, Jehovah is the older English form of the Lord's name.

"John" means "Favour of Jehovah." It fits beautifully with the names of Zacharias and Elizabeth. Together those two names say, "Jehovah remembers the oath of God," and the blessed result of that remembering is "the Favour of Jehovah." Gabriel — the name means "God is mighty" — announces that Zacharias' prayer had been heard. The answer was now given. The prayers of many years had not been forgotten. God's time for the answer had come.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Far past what he asked

The angel does not stop at the birth. He tells the father what this son will do.

Zacharias had asked for a son. He got an answer that his son should be the immediate forerunner of the long-expected Messiah... Far beyond the aged priest's desires or ideas God was about to go. The son he asked for would not come to serve in his father's place in the sanctuary at Jerusalem. He would come to bow the hearts of multitudes like reeds before the wind, and to make ready a people for the Lord.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Praying without expecting

There is a gap between asking God and expecting God to answer. That gap is the warning in this story for everyone who prays.

Unbelief works in such a subtle way. Believers often pray, and pray hard, yet the last thing they seem to expect is that God will grant what they ask! Old Zacharias had prayed that he might have a son; so it appears from Luke 1:13. He had faith to pray, but not faith to believe that God would grant his prayer. When the angel Gabriel tells him that his prayer is heard, and that his wife will bear him a son, he does not rejoice and worship. He asks, "How shall I know this?" But our God is very gracious. For this unbelief He disciplines Zacharias by taking away his speech for a time, yet He still does not withhold the answer to his prayer.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. The prayer was old and seemed forgotten by the man who prayed it — but not by God, who kept it until the right hour.

- Held. The delay was not refusal. It was timing. God answers prayer at the right time and in His own way.

- Named. John means "the favour of Jehovah" — the answer arrives carrying God's grace in its very name.

- Enlarged. He asked for a child; he received the forerunner of the Lord. God's reply outran the request.

- Exposed. Zechariah had faith to pray but not faith to believe. God disciplined the unbelief and still gave the gift.

Luke 1:14 · Darby

And he shall be to thee joy and rejoicing, and many shall rejoice at his birth.

Gabriel comes to Zacharias, an aged priest who had long prayed for a son. The angel promises far more than a child, and that raises a question: why should many people rejoice at one family's answered prayer?

A prayer answered beyond what was asked

Zacharias had prayed for one thing. The angel's reply goes far past it.

As to Daniel so to Zacharias, Gabriel came in answer to prayer, and both times God let him announce more than had been asked. Daniel was concerned about the end of the captivity. He got an answer that looks on to the future and final deliverance of his people. Zacharias had asked for a son. He got an answer that his son would be the immediate forerunner of the long-expected Messiah. His prayer was heard. His wife would bear a son, bringing joy to the father's heart and causing many to rejoice at his birth. His name was to be John, a reminder of God's graciousness. He was to be great in the sight of the Lord… God was about to go far beyond the aged priest's desires or ideas.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The long wait was not a refusal. One writer points to God's timing:

The answer to his prayer had certainly been long in coming. But the delay was now explained, as he learned who his son was to be. God answers prayer at the right time.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Joy arriving where fear stood

Just before this, the angel tells Zacharias, "Do not be afraid." One writer sees our own reaction in that order:

Yet fear falls upon Zacharias: sadly, this cannot surprise us. We are far too used to His own people misreading His goodness like this. God means us good, and we charge Him with evil. Because we have not fully learned the lesson of His love, the fear that brings torment takes hold of us. How often He has to say to us, "Fear not," when He is about to give us perhaps the very blessing we have long sought.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why "many" and not the parents only

The joy reaches past the parents because of what the child is sent to do.

This is true at least of Zacharias. The angel has to tell him that his prayer is heard, and that a son will be born to him — a joy not to himself only but to many. For the child comes, filled with the Spirit, to turn many to God in Israel. He goes before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah, to make ready a people for the Lord.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Luke later records the day the promise came true:

Gabriel had announced that many would rejoice at John's birth, and the historian now records how it came true (1:58)… A wonderful child was born, but a greater had yet to appear.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A measured joy, and a greater one behind it

One writer sets this joy beside the joy announced at another birth:

John's task was "to make ready for the Lord a people prepared" (1:17). If his birth was a matter of joy, the birth of the Lord Himself was a subject of even greater joy: "Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy" (2:10). The angel used the word mega: mega-joy!

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Joy from the first page to the last

The joy of this verse is where Luke's account begins. It is also where it ends:

And now the gospel, which began with joy (Luke 1:14), closes with joy. They "returned to Jerusalem with great joy," for the angels had assured them of the Lord's personal return. Nor could that joy be dampened, nor did they hide it, for "they were continually in the temple blessing God."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Another writer gives the reason for so much joy in this Gospel:

Luke has much joy, because much of grace.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Prayer — Zacharias asked for a son and was given the forerunner of the Messiah. The long delay was not a refusal but God's timing.

- Fear — the joy is announced right after the angel says, "Do not be afraid." We often read God's goodness as a threat, just as the blessing we asked for arrives.

- Grace — Luke's account is full of joy for one reason. It is full of grace.

- Many — the gladness does not stop with the parents. The child comes filled with the Spirit, to turn many in Israel back to God.

- Greater — John's birth brings joy; the Lord's birth is announced as mega-joy. The book that opens with joy closes with disciples blessing God in the temple.

Luke 1:15 · Darby

For he shall be great before [the] Lord, and he shall drink no wine nor strong drink; and he shall be filled with [the] Holy Spirit, even from his mother's womb.

An angel came to a priest named Zacharias and told him what his son John would be like. Three things mark the boy out: greatness before God, no wine, and the Holy Spirit from the very start of his life.

Great before the Lord

One writer compares what the angel says about John with what he says about Jesus a few verses later.

The contrast between these two messages is worth noticing. John was to be "great before the Lord." Of Jesus the angel said, "He will be great." All John the Baptist's greatness depended on the Person whose coming he announced. Jesus was great in Himself and of Himself. From where I write, I can see, in the light of the rising sun, the shadow of a chestnut tree stretching out to enormous size. Yet that shadow is not a picture of the size of the tree, but a witness to the sun's rising and splendour.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

No wine or strong drink

Why forbid wine? The angel's words point to an old vow of separation.

This is Nazariteship, or at least the first mark of it. John could only be great before the Lord by being a Nazarite. From Numbers 6 we see that to be a Nazarite was "to separate oneself to the Lord." There were three distinct signs. First, the Nazarite kept away from wine and strong drink. Next, he let the hair of his head grow. Finally, he "came near no dead body." He gave up wine — the sign of joy in the heart of the natural man among his equals. His long hair announced that he had given up the dignity and rights of man for subjection to the will of God. And last, he avoided everything that could bring him into contact with sin, whose wages is death. … Seeing him, the world would have said, "He is a sad, gloomy man who hates people." What a mistake! This natural joy is the only joy the world knows. In the prophet's heart, the joy that close fellowship with the Saviour gives took its place. The two cannot exist together. We enjoy the second only as far as we deny ourselves the first.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Luke names only one of those three signs. Still, God set John apart from birth — and unlike another man marked out the same way, he never lost it.

It seems that John the Baptist was under this or a similar vow from birth. In Luke 1:15, abstinence from wine or strong drink is mentioned, but not the other two things. Here we have a contrast. Samson's strength was physical; John's strength was spiritual. The one lost his Nazariteship, the other kept it until he died a martyr's death.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Holding that place is one thing. Living it out is another.

A child can be a Nazarite, but this is the work of God. We have two instances of Nazarites from their birth: one who went on blamelessly, and another who failed sadly — John the Baptist and Samson. Samson served God, and did great things too, but he also sought and did his own will, so that his life ended in his being taken prisoner. So you see it is not everything to be in the place of a Nazarite: there must be self-denial and patient perseverance in the ways of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Filled with the Spirit from his mother's womb

This filling is not what a Christian receives today. The difference lies in what filling is for.

This is said of John the Baptist. Now we know he was not in the Church, but the forerunner of our Lord. He was not sealed with the Spirit nor baptized by the Spirit, but he was filled with the Spirit. Filling has to do with power and service, and John was equipped for his service from earliest childhood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That equipping was tied to one job that belonged to one man.

It was also God's sovereign ordering that he should be filled with the Holy Spirit from his birth. There was only one John the Baptist: it would be folly for another to aspire to be the same as he (Jer. 1:5). John would be divinely prepared for his unique service of preparing the way of the Lord.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The two halves belong together

The verse puts the ban on wine and the filling side by side. One writer reads that order as a lesson for every believer.

Here it is as if the special power of the Holy Spirit were connected with Nazariteship. Many Christians imagine that to be filled with the Holy Spirit is a special favour that could only belong to privileged ones among God's people. Not at all. Every believer is a temple of the Holy Spirit, but not every believer is filled by Him. And why? Is it a lack of power on the part of the Holy Spirit? Certainly not. What is lacking, even among Christians who know deliverance, so that they are not filled with the Spirit? The reality of Nazariteship. As Ephesians 5:18 says, "Do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Great — John's greatness was borrowed, not his own. Like a shadow, he was a witness to the One whose coming he announced.

- Separated — the ban on wine is the first mark of a Nazarite: a man set apart to God, who gives up the world's joy, his own dignity, and all contact with death.

- Filled — John was never sealed or baptized with the Spirit, yet he was filled with Him from the womb. Filling is power for service.

- Kept — Samson was a Nazarite from birth and lost it. John kept his to a martyr's death. The place alone is not enough; it takes self-denial and patience.

- Applied — the same order stands for us: real separation first, then fullness of the Spirit.

after_note: DELETE

Luke 1:16 · Darby

And many of the sons of Israel shall he turn to [the] Lord their God.

The angel Gabriel is describing a child who has not yet been born. The promise raises two questions: who is "the Lord their God" the people turn to, and why does the angel say many and not all?

The aim of the mission

One writer reads this line as the goal of John's whole ministry. He links it to what the angel had just said about the child:

"He will be great before the Lord, and he must not drink wine or strong drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother's womb." He was to be a Nazirite, separated to the Lord. That separation was not only outward; it came with inward and special power of God. "And he will turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord their God." This would be the characteristic aim of his mission — to recall them to God, from whom they had departed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer marks the limit of that work:

John was now to recall the people in the spirit and power of Elijah. It is repentance. It is not, of course, the great work of God in putting away sin — that could only be done by one, even Jesus the Lord. Nor is it the power of the Holy Spirit poured out on Israel. This also could only be done by Christ.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What made him great

So what made John great? One writer contrasts his message with that of every prophet before him:

It was said of John that he should be great in the eyes of the Lord, and what made him great would be that he would "turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord their God." Other prophets had turned the people back to the law they had broken, to the Sabbath they had violated, to the sacrifices they had neglected, or to the Temple they had defiled. But when John the Baptist came, the nation had broken down completely, and that whole era was about to end. So he turns their hearts to the Lord Jesus Christ — the One who was coming.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

The covenant name behind "the Lord"

The title here is not a general word for God. One writer notes what it stands for in this part of Luke:

In verses 6, 9, 11, 15, 16 and 17, "Lord" is the equivalent of the Old Testament "Jehovah," so the coming of the Messiah is to be the coming of Jehovah.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

That coming shaped the character of John's message:

Indeed, the angel Gabriel said of John that he should go before the Lord "in the spirit and power of Elijah;" and that is what marked the searching, sifting nature of his testimony. It was preparation for the One who was coming. It said, in fact, that God was coming.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Who the "many" turned out to be

So who were the many? One writer describes the group John's ministry brought to light:

When God worked in many, as He did through John's ministry, He brought to light a company of people who walked in the steps of the men of faith of old. So in practice they formed "the remnant" so often spoken of — the core of God's Israel, over whom Christ was to reign. The beginning of Luke's gospel sets out the moral character of this remnant beautifully. They trusted in God's mercy, felt their need of a Saviour, and learned salvation "in the forgiveness of their sins." They looked for nothing in themselves that could give them any claim to the promised blessings.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why "many" and not all

One writer reads the word many as a careful limit. The turning John achieved was real, but it did not reach the whole nation:

In the spirit and power of Elijah came Jehovah's messenger, John the Baptist, and he turned many of the sons of Israel to Jehovah their God. The language seems careful to guard against the mistake of thinking this was the predicted mission of Elijah the prophet... So for the time the moral restoration of the Jews was partial. Most of the people did not repent, family bonds were completely broken, and a curse struck the land from that day to this. But it will not always be so. For grace will work in a remnant once more in the last days.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Turn — the word that defines John. His mission was to recall Israel to the God they had walked away from.

- Turn, not reform — earlier prophets sent people back to law, Sabbath, sacrifice and temple. John came at the end of a broken era, and he turned hearts to the coming Christ.

- Turn to whom — "the Lord their God" carries the Old Testament covenant name. The Messiah's coming is God's own coming, and that is why John's preaching searched and sifted.

- Turned many — the turning was repentance, and it left a remnant: people who trusted God's mercy, felt their need of a Saviour, and claimed nothing in themselves.

- Not yet all — the turning was partial. One writer looks on to a later day, when grace will work in a remnant again.

Luke 1:17 · Darby

And *he* shall go before him in [the] spirit and power of Elias, to turn hearts of fathers to children, and disobedient ones to [the] thoughts of just [men], to make ready for [the] Lord a prepared people.

An angel is describing the work of a son not yet born. John will walk ahead of the Lord with Elijah's spirit and power, mend broken family ties, and get a people ready. Two questions follow. In what sense was John "Elijah"? And what makes a people ready for God?

Whose Coming Was Being Announced

The child would go "before Him." Commentators point out that the "Him" in this passage is not a lesser figure, and that the wording of the whole section says so.

In verses 6, 9, 11, 15, 16 and 17, "Lord" is the equivalent of the Old Testament "Jehovah," so the coming of the Messiah is to be the coming of Jehovah. There were to be people on earth who were prepared to receive Christ when He came.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Spirit and Power of Elijah

Why Elijah, of all the prophets? One writer looks at Elijah's own story, then marks where John's work stopped.

Elijah was the prophet who took up the broken obligations of the people. That is why he went to Horeb… Horeb was where God gave the law, and Elijah went back there, feeling how far the people had departed from God. John should now recall the people in the spirit and power of Elijah. It is repentance. It is not, of course, the great work of God in putting away sin — only one could do that, Jesus the Lord. Neither is it the power of the Holy Spirit poured out on Israel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not Elijah Himself

The angel says "spirit and power," not "Elijah." That small difference answers a question people raised about John himself.

John was not the same person as Elijah. His service before the Lord was "in the spirit and power of Elijah." John's ministry had the same character as Elijah's. It pressed hard on Israel the guilt of their disobedience to the law. The reference here is to Malachi 4:6. Some of the Jews took it to mean Elijah in person, but John denied that reading (John 1:21).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Because John's fulfilment was moral rather than literal, writers hold that Malachi's promise still has a future side to it.

Though Luke 1:17 clearly refers to Malachi 4:5-6, even there it applies only in a moral way, or to faith, not as history. This is how our Lord Himself puts the case in Matthew 11:14: "if you are willing to accept it, he is Elijah who is to come." Nothing is farther from His mind than to set aside a future action of Elijah before the great and terrible day of Jehovah comes. That description in no way suits His first coming in grace, even though moral judgement goes with that grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Hearts Turned, Minds Changed

The identity of the "fathers" is not agreed. Some have read them as ordinary parents whose affection for their children had faded; others read them as the ancestors of the nation.

Plummer points to a fading of parental affection. Augustine's idea, adopted by Calvin, was that the "fathers" means the patriarchs.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Bringing the Disobedient to Wisdom

The next phrase says more than it seems. One writer shows what the wording leaves out. His translation reads "the thoughts of just men."

Luke 1:17 leaves a word out, and the sense is packed. John was to turn disobedient ones not merely to the thoughts of just men, but so as to remain in them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Making Ready a Prepared People

The last clause holds two jobs at once.

John was to prepare the way; the people were to prepare their hearts. The holy men of old saw this ahead of time and spoke of it, as the Holy Spirit moved them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What Hangs on It

Malachi's book ends on the edge of a curse.

What the last verse of Malachi says may seem unclear, but Luke 1:17 makes its bearing plain. The "disobedient" will be turned to "the wisdom of the just," and so a people prepared for the Lord. In this way there will be a godly remnant. Otherwise a curse would strike the whole earth.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Coming. John walked ahead of the "Lord" — the Old Testament name of God. The Messiah's arrival is God's own arrival.

- Character. John came in Elijah's spirit and power. Elijah carried the people's broken obligations back to Horeb. So John's call was searching repentance, not the removal of sin or the outpouring of the Spirit.

- Person. John was Elijah in character, not in person. He said so himself. Commentators hold that Malachi's promise still waits for more before the day of the Lord.

- Change. John was to unite hearts and teach the disobedient. They were not just pointed toward the wisdom of the just. They were to settle and stay in it.

- Result. A herald prepares the road; a people prepares its heart. Where that happens, God has a remnant, and the earth escapes the curse.