But in the sixth month, the angel Gabriel was sent of God to a city of Galilee, of which [the] name [was] Nazareth,
Luke's account moves from the temple in Jerusalem to a small town in the north, and from a priest to an unknown young woman. The same angel carries both errands. Why did God choose this place and this person to announce the Messiah's birth?
The setting of this second visit says as much as the message. One writer draws out what the change of place means:
The angel Gabriel is sent from God in the sixth month (of Elizabeth's pregnancy) with a more important message. After the long silence of centuries, heaven speaks again. In Luke it speaks in a more familiar way than in Matthew, where Joseph receives the messages, but in a dream. Here we have open, face-to-face speech. And the most important message comes not in the temple, but in a private home. God is coming near in His grace; and He always reveals Himself more fully the nearer He comes.
Gabriel is not a new figure in Scripture. God had sent him once before with a message about the Messiah:
It was the angel Gabriel who was sent to Daniel to make known long ago the Messiah's coming and cutting off, in the famous prophecy of the seventy weeks (Dan. 9:26). Now he comes to Mary, the one promised in marriage to Joseph, and announces to her — "the virgin" of a still older prophet (Isa. 7:14) — the birth of that Messiah.
Every detail of the address points downward. The angel passes by the religious centre of the nation, and the royal line he reaches has fallen:
The angel's mission now is not to the temple, nor to Jerusalem. It is to Galilee of the Gentiles, and to Nazareth. It is to a virgin promised in marriage to a man named Joseph, of the fallen house of David. The virgin's name is Mary, or Miriam ("exalted"). All is in ruin here, when God comes in to revive and raise to higher glory.
How far that house had fallen shows up in Joseph's trade, and how little it mattered to God:
In Nazareth, that despised place, there was found a young virgin, unknown by the world, whose name was Mary. She was promised in marriage to Joseph, who was of the house of David. But everything in Israel was so out of order that this descendant of the king was a carpenter. But what is this to God? Mary was a chosen vessel; she had found favour in the eyes of God.
Nothing about the town or the woman explains the errand. That mismatch is the point:
What was there in Nazareth and what in Mary that led the angel there? The city was small, obscure, and belonging to Galilee. The virgin was unknown, and, as she says, "of humble estate" (v. 52). There was no match between the place, the person, and the promise. But we must remember that grace owes nothing to what it finds here. And He whose coming is now announced comes to lowly circumstances and to humble, repentant hearts. He did not despise the virgin's womb.
This is not an accident of history but a settled pattern in how God works, and it fits the whole tone of Luke's Gospel:
Luke records the visit of Gabriel to Mary, a lowly virgin, at Nazareth in circumstances of the greatest poverty, but rich in faith… This is in perfect keeping with the Gospel, which sets out that surpassing grace that has come down to the very lowest in the eyes of men. Mary might be poor, and Nazareth despised, but these are what God will take up to accomplish His purposes.
The priest in the temple and the young woman in Nazareth answered the same angel in opposite ways:
The priest under the law did not believe the message of grace that Gabriel brought. So this representative of Israel could not speak until the day when God fulfilled His promise in grace. Then he could praise the Author of his salvation, as the faithful remnant will one day. Mary was not only godly, but humble and simple — an object of grace, and not a representative of the law. "You have found favour with God," said the angel. She was submissive: "Behold, I am the servant of the Lord." Her confidence was in the word of God, for she added, "let it be to me according to your word."
- Sent by God. The silence of centuries breaks with open, face-to-face speech, not a dream. The nearer God comes, the more He shows of Himself.
- Sent through Gabriel. This same messenger told Daniel long ago when the Messiah would come. Now he announces that the time has arrived.
- Sent to Nazareth. He passes by the temple and Jerusalem for an obscure town in Galilee. There David's royal line has sunk to a carpenter's trade.
- Sent to Mary. There was no match between the place, the person and the promise. Grace owes nothing to what it finds here.
- Received by faith. The priest doubted and fell silent. The unknown young woman answered, "let it be to me according to your word" — the fitting reply to a message of pure grace.
to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name [was] Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name [was] Mary.
God sends the angel Gabriel to a small town in Galilee, to a young woman nobody had heard of. She is promised in marriage to a man from David's royal line, and both facts shape the rest of Luke.
One writer weighs the gap between the messenger and the address:
What was there in Nazareth and what in Mary that led the angel there? The city was small, obscure, and belonging to Galilee. The virgin was unknown, and, as she says, "of low degree" (v. 52). The place, the person, and the promise did not match each other. But we must remember that grace owes nothing to anything here. He whose coming is now announced comes to lowly circumstances and to broken and humble hearts. He did not despise the virgin's womb.
Another writer reads the ruin of the nation into the address:
The angel's mission now is not to the temple or to Jerusalem. It is to Galilee of the Gentiles, to Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man named Joseph, of the fallen house of David. The virgin's name is Mary, or Miriam ("exalted"). All is in ruin here, when God comes in to revive and raise to higher glory.
"Of the house of David" sounds like a title of honour. In daily life it had sunk very low.
In Nazareth, that despised place, there was found a young virgin, unknown by the world, whose name was Mary. She was betrothed to Joseph, who was of the house of David. But everything in Israel was so out of order that this descendant of the king was a carpenter. But what is this to God? Mary was a chosen vessel; she had found favour in the eyes of God.
Both Mary and Joseph came from David, but by different branches. One writer sets out which line each of them belonged to:
Mary is the principal figure of the two in Luke, and there, I believe, the genealogy is hers… There were two lines that came down unbroken to those days — the house of Solomon and the house of Nathan. Mary was the representative of Nathan's family, as Joseph was of Solomon's.
Betrothal in Israel was not an engagement in the modern sense. It carried the weight of the marriage itself.
The Jews looked on this as being as binding as marriage. Only a divorce could end it… Mary, the mother of the Lord Jesus, was betrothed to Joseph. He thought about divorcing her quietly, but the angel of the Lord told him the truth about her condition.
A claim to David's throne could not rest on Mary alone.
The Messiah had to be born not merely of a virgin, nor of a virgin daughter of David, but of one legally united to Joseph — in the eye of the law, really his wife… Let people slander as they might, Mary must be betrothed to Joseph. Otherwise the Lord Jesus would not have a proper title to the throne of David.
There was a further obstacle. The royal line running through Joseph lay under a prophetic curse:
A curse struck the direct line of descent, yet the line kept its legal title. So it could hand on to another what could be of no use to itself. The marriage of Joseph and Mary was, in the wisdom of God, the means of accomplishing this. The Lord's birth from Mary made Him the real Son of David (Luke 1:32) while the marriage of His mother made Him David's legal heir.
Luke twice calls Mary a virgin. That word guards a truth the gospel cannot do without:
We may be the 150th generation from Adam, but we are simply "after his kind". We could go on reproducing ourselves and push the first man and his race endlessly into eternity. We should still only have fallen man… There never was a real and original second man until Jesus was born, and that broke the inherited chain of sin and death. He was conceived by the Holy Spirit's power. Discard the virgin birth, and you have lost this great foundation truth of the gospel.
The verse names her and gives her no title. One writer marks the limit:
She was a woman, uniquely favoured because God chose her out of all the virgins of Israel to be the mother of the Lord. Yet the more we make of Mary, the less we make of the divine miracle of this holy birth.
- Place — Nazareth was small, obscure and in Galilee. The angel went there, not to the temple or Jerusalem.
- Person — an unknown young woman of humble estate, betrothed to a carpenter who came from the royal line.
- Promise — the place, the person and the promise did not match — grace owes nothing to anything here.
- Proof — betrothal was as binding as marriage. So Jesus was Mary's real Son and Joseph's legal heir, and His title to David's throne stood up in law.
- Purity — "virgin" is not decoration. Without conception by the Holy Spirit we have only Adam's fallen race again, and the foundation of the gospel is gone.
And the angel came in to her, and said, Hail, [thou] favoured one! the Lord [is] with thee [blessed art *thou* amongst women].
In Luke's Gospel, the birth of Jesus opens with an angel greeting a young woman in Nazareth. Two questions follow. What does the greeting say about Mary? And what does it say about the God who sent it?
The place had no standing. The household had no wealth.
This was the last place man would have chosen for God's purpose. In the world's eyes, the name of the town was enough to condemn anyone who came from there. There a young woman, unknown to everyone the world recognised, was engaged to a poor carpenter. Her name was Mary. But everything was in confusion in Israel: the carpenter was of the house of David. God never forgets His promises, and He never overlooks the people they concern. Here was the place where they would be fulfilled. Whether Nazareth was small or great made no difference. It only showed this: God expects nothing from man; man expects everything from God.
Gabriel had brought news of the Messiah before.
It was Gabriel who was sent to the prophet Daniel long ago, to make known the Messiah's coming and cutting off in the famous prophecy of the seventy weeks (Daniel 9:26). Now he comes to Mary, the one engaged to Joseph, and announces to her — "the virgin" of an even older prophet (Isaiah 7:14) — the birth of that Messiah. No wonder he greets her as a favoured one, with whom the Lord was… She is the chosen channel of the wonderful purposes that would yet fill her own people, and the whole world, with blessing. She is the appointed mother of One in whom God was about to solve every difficulty sin had brought into the world, and to do it by a righteous triumph over it. He would even make it possible for God to bless those who believed, sinners though they had been.
The words are not a random compliment. They move outward in three steps, and the first word carries the theme of the whole Gospel.
Gabriel's greeting speaks of great grace given to Mary. ("Favour" and "grace" translate the same Greek word.) It speaks of the Lord's presence with her, and of her being blessed among women. So her personal blessing comes first: great grace given to her. Then comes her relationship to the Lord: His presence with her. Then her relationship to others: blessed among women.
Older translations render the greeting "highly favoured"; the ESV has "O favored one." A moment later Gabriel tells Mary she has found favour with God.
The expressions "found favour" and "highly favoured" do not mean the same thing at all. She herself had found favour, so she was not to fear. But God, by His own choice, had given her this grace — the immense favour of being the mother of the Lord. In this she was the object of God's sovereign favour… Finding favour with God refers to Mary's own spiritual state. Being highly favoured refers to her being God's chosen vessel for the birth of Jesus. But the two are truly connected.
Gabriel's praise is high. His wording is also measured.
The angel tells her she is "highly favoured" (Luke 1:28). Could any woman have a higher favour than to be the mother of our Lord in His human birth? "Blessed are you among women" (Luke 1:28) is the angel's greeting. "Blessed" she certainly was. Note, it does not say "Most blessed." The language is restrained. There is no room there for the worship of Mary.
There is also a question about the text. Some manuscripts add a second clause here and others do not, and the ESV ends the greeting at "the Lord is with you!"
"Hail, favoured one!" said Gabriel to Mary. The words "Blessed are you among women" belong to the meeting with her cousin Elizabeth. The Revised Version agrees, following the best authority. The Latin Vulgate leaned towards heaping honour on Mary, and many followed it.
There is an opposite mistake.
Humanly speaking, Mary was most highly favoured. God singled her out by a supreme distinction. It is even possible that, in a right desire to keep clear of Roman Catholic error, Protestants have overlooked the remarkable honour God gave her. If that is an error at all, it errs on the right side.
- Favour, not merit. "Favour" and "grace" translate the same Greek word. The greeting names a gift to Mary, not a wage she earned.
- Favour lands low. God chose a despised town and a poor carpenter's home. Man expects everything from God; God expects nothing from man.
- Favour has two senses. She had found favour with God herself. She was also chosen as the vessel for the Lord's birth. The two are linked, but not the same.
- Favour flows outward. Grace given to her, then the Lord with her, then blessing reaching others.
- Favour keeps its measure. The wording is restrained: "blessed," not "most blessed." The best manuscripts leave out the second clause. Yet the honour God gave her is real.
But she, [seeing] [the angel], was troubled at his word, and reasoned in her mind what this salutation might be.
Gabriel has just greeted Mary, and her first response is not speech. She keeps silent and turns the greeting over in her mind. Was her trouble a failure of faith, or something else?
Who Mary was explains how she took the greeting.
But Mary, when she saw the angel — who no doubt appeared in human form (see Luke 24:4) — "was greatly troubled at the saying, and tried to discern what sort of greeting this might be." That is, she reasoned inwardly about the nature of Gabriel's words. She was asking what their "aim and meaning" were. We can understand this if we recall her character and position. She was a devout, God-fearing woman, and, whatever her ancestry, she seems to have lived in lowly circumstances. Meekness, humility, and faith were the clear marks of her spiritual life. So she might well be troubled at what she had heard, and reason about what the angel's words meant. This was not the natural mind reasoning as the offspring of doubt. It sprang from perplexity of soul.
Older translations say Mary "cast in her mind." The Greek word behind that phrase turns up all through Luke, translated differently each time.
The word "thoughts" (dialogismoi) stands for inward reasonings. The same Greek word occurs in the following passages, though it is not always translated "thoughts." (1) Mary "cast in her mind" what manner of greeting the angel's was (Luke 1:29). (2) The people "mused" in their hearts whether John the Baptist was the Messiah or not (Luke 3:15). (3) Jesus said to the disciples when He appeared among them, Why do thoughts arise in your hearts? (Luke 24:38)… (5) The rich man whose crops were plentiful worked out his plans for future ease after he had "thought within himself" (Luke 12:17).
Gabriel does not press on with his announcement while Mary is still unsettled.
God gave Gabriel insight into Mary's feelings. So he first calms her mind. Then he assures her that she has found favour with God, preparing her for the amazing message he was sent to bring. We say "in preparation" for Gabriel's message, because a soul must be at peace and free before it can receive divine things.
How she waited matters as much as what she heard.
Mary was perplexed at such words, as no doubt also by the sudden appearance of the angel, but wisely waited in silence for an explanation. "Fear not," he says, to set her at rest. Again he speaks of her as favoured by God — grace, or favour, is a subject Luke brings out beautifully. No human merit could deserve such honour as being chosen by God to be the mother of the Messiah.
The greeting that unsettled her carried an enormous weight.
No wonder he greets her as a favoured one, with whom the Lord was… Mary, though troubled, pondered what the meaning of this greeting might be. The angel tells her not to fear, for she has found favour with God. She is the chosen channel of the wonderful purposes that would yet fill the world, and her own people too, with blessing. She is to be the appointed mother of One in whom God was about to solve, by a righteous triumph, every difficulty that sin had brought into the world. In Him God could even bless those who believed, sinners though they had been, and make them triumph righteously through Him and with Him.
Commentators separate two kinds of favour here.
"The expressions 'found favour' and 'highly favoured' do not at all mean the same thing. Personally she had found favour, so she was not to fear. But God had given her this grace of His own choice, this immense favour: to be the mother of the Lord. In this she was the object of God's sovereign favour." We can add that finding favour with God refers to Mary's spiritual state. Being highly favoured speaks rather of God choosing her as the vessel for the birth of Jesus. But the two things are certainly connected.
- Troubled — Her trouble came from perplexity of soul, not from a doubting mind. She waited in silence for the meaning of the greeting.
- Thinking — The same Greek word covers the crowd musing over John and the rich man planning his future ease. The word is neutral. The heart behind it decides.
- Calmed — Gabriel settles her before he announces anything. A soul must be at peace and free before it can receive divine things.
- Favoured — "Found favour" and "highly favoured" are not the same. One speaks of her spiritual state. The other speaks of God's own choice of her, which no merit could earn.
- Purposed — Through the Son she would bear, God would solve every difficulty sin brought into the world, and bless believing sinners with a righteous triumph.
And the angel said to her, Fear not, Mary, for thou hast found favour with God;
Gabriel had already brought a message to Zacharias the priest. Now he comes to Mary, and his first word deals with her fear. The verse turns on one phrase — she has found favour with God — and the message that follows rests on it.
The greeting troubled Mary, and the angel does not press on until she is settled. Commentators see an order here: peace first, then the message.
She might well be troubled at what she heard, and reason about it — not out of doubt, but out of a puzzled heart, wondering what the angel's greeting meant. God gave Gabriel insight into Mary's feelings. So he first calms her mind. Then, to prepare her for the astonishing message he came to bring, he assures her that she has found favour with God. We say "in preparation" for Gabriel's message, because a soul cannot receive divine things until it is at peace and free.
Mary was not the only one who needed that word.
Sometimes He reveals Himself only by an angel, a mighty heavenly messenger. Even then the soul He speaks to is deeply troubled. It needs, like Zacharias or Mary, this very comforting word, "Fear not."
Luke's Gospel keeps grace in view, and favour is another word for it. Nothing in Mary earned what she was about to receive.
"Fear not," he says, to set her at rest. Again he speaks of God's favour toward her. Luke emphasises this subject — grace, or favour — beautifully. No human merit could deserve such an honour: that God should choose her to be the mother of the Messiah.
Verse 28 calls her highly favoured. This verse says she has found favour. Writers keep the two apart.
The expressions "found favour" and "highly favoured" do not have the same meaning at all. She herself had found favour, so she was not to fear. But in His sovereignty God had given her this grace, this immense favour, of being the mother of the Lord. In this she was the object of God's sovereign favour… Finding favour with God refers to Mary's spiritual state. Being highly favoured speaks more of her place as God's chosen vessel for the birth of Jesus. But the two things are certainly connected.
The priest Zacharias doubted his message. Mary submitted to hers. Commentators trace the difference to grace.
The law does not produce confidence. Grace alone calls that out. The priest under the law did not believe the message of grace that Gabriel brought… Mary was not only pious. She was humble and simple — an object of grace, not a representative of the law. "You have found favour with God," said the angel. She was subject: "Behold, I am the servant of the Lord." Her confidence was in the word of God, for she added, "Let it be to me according to your word."
In her own song, Mary names her own need.
Mary was the mother of our Lord according to the flesh. She was surely "blessed among women," chosen for the highest honour possible to a woman. In her song she says, "my spirit rejoices in God my Savior" (Luke 1:47). Now if Mary had been sinless she had no need of a Saviour — and she certainly needed a Saviour, like the rest of us.
Another writer holds both sides together.
Mary is great in that she is nothing. Yet God favours her in a way no one else shares.
The favour was not a private honour.
The angel tells her not to fear, for she has found favour with God. She is the chosen channel of wonderful purposes. Those purposes would yet fill her own people, and the world too, with blessing. She is to be the appointed mother of the One in whom God was about to solve every difficulty sin had brought into the world, and to do it by a righteous triumph over sin.
And what came to her as a rare distinction is now the settled ground of every believer.
David the king found favour in the sight of God, and so did Mary of Nazareth, the mother of Jesus. But these were exceptional cases. The New Testament shows that standing in the favour of God is not limited to a few. All who are justified have it alike.
- Fear stilled. God quiets the heart before He entrusts it with anything. Gabriel's "Do not be afraid" clears the way for the message.
- Favour given. "Found favour" is the language of grace — no merit could qualify anyone to carry the Messiah.
- Favour distinguished. Found favour speaks of her own state before God. Highly favoured speaks of the unique task God gave her.
- Favour received. Law left Zacharias doubting; grace made Mary submissive — "let it be to me according to your word."
- Favour extended. Hers was an exceptional case. In the New Testament the same standing in God's favour belongs alike to all who are justified.
and behold, thou shalt conceive in the womb and bear a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus.
The angel tells Mary what is about to happen, and he names the child himself. Everything he says next about greatness, a throne, and a kingdom rests on the one who carries that name.
"Jesus" is not just a label. The name carries a meaning, and that meaning is far bigger than the home the child was born into.
As you can see from Hebrews 4:8, Jesus is the Greek form of Joshua, or Jehoshua. The name means "Jehovah is salvation," or "whose salvation is Jehovah." So there is good reason for the common observation that the name Jesus means Jehovah the Saviour. If so, what a subject this sets before our souls to think about — yes, and to adore! God Himself declares that a child born into the world, of lowly parentage in man's esteem, is Jehovah the Saviour!
The name would have raised no eyebrows in first-century Israel. Other men wore it, before and after Him.
"Jesus." The name (Jeshua), Nehemiah 8:17, was very common among the Jews of the time. Colossians 4:11 mentions a Jesus called Justus, one of the Jews. One of the Lord's own human ancestors bore the same name — see Luke 3:29. The Talmud wanted to get rid of the original meaning of "the name" (James 2:7). So while it uses "Jeshua" for everyone else who bore that name, it regularly calls the Lord by the clipped name Jesu.
after_note: DELETE
The lowliness of the name and the glory in it belong together:
It is His personal, human name: the name which tells us of His grace and tenderness, His lowly life, His sorrow, and His death. But this name also carries divine glory with it, for it means JEHOVAH THE SAVIOUR. Yes, the very name of His humiliation, the one written in mockery on His cross, declares to us the greatness of His person and the love of His heart.
The angel says the conception happens in her womb. That small phrase settles a question about where the Lord's humanity came from.
It is wrong and misleading to say that the human nature of Christ was created in the virgin's womb — that is, formed out of nothing. Such a claim plainly departs from Scripture. Mary undoubtedly had her part in the sacred mystery, as the angel said to her, "You will conceive in your womb and bear a son." Some claim that the Lord's "holy humanity was created by a creative act of the Holy Spirit." That claim in effect denies the angel's own words to Mary about her conception.
In Matthew, the angel gives the same instruction to Joseph. Each Gospel has a reason for its choice.
Here again Joseph was the one who acted in public, while in Luke (Luke 1:31) Mary gave the name. The difference comes from the point of view the Holy Spirit gives us of our Lord's person in the two Gospels. In Luke He was proving that Jesus, though divine, was truly man — a partaker of humanity apart from sin. In our case it is sinful human nature; in His case it was holy… One great aim of that Gospel was to prove His holy manhood. It shows how fully and how suitably He could be a Saviour of men. He could take up the sorrows and the misery, and on the cross suffer for the sinfulness of others — Himself the Holy One.
The angel does not stop at the name. He goes straight on to speak of a throne.
So he says, "you shall call his name Jesus" — a Divine Saviour. "He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David." This is another and quite different glory. It joins His title of Messiah to saving power… Even in the lowest sphere, how far His kingdom is from being a mere human dominion!
The first half of the angel's message has already come true. Commentators read that as the guarantee of the rest.
Surely every "shall" in this wonderful passage must come true, as really and as literally as the birth of Jesus did. God said He should be born: it came to pass. God says He shall reign over the house of Jacob: it will surely come to pass.
- Named — Jesus is the Greek form of Joshua. It means "Jehovah is salvation," so God calls a child of humble parents Jehovah the Saviour.
- Common — the name was ordinary among Jews of that day. The name of His humiliation is the very name that carries His divine glory.
- Conceived — the angel says Mary will conceive. She truly had her part, so His humanity was not formed out of nothing.
- Holy — Luke sets out to prove real manhood without sin. That is why Mary gives the name here, while Joseph gives it in Matthew.
- Reigning — the saving name comes with a throne and a kingdom. The "shall" of His birth came true, so the "shall" of His reign will too.
*He* shall be great, and shall be called Son of [the] Highest; and [the] Lord God shall give him the throne of David his father;
Gabriel tells Mary who her child will be, and what God will give Him. Two glories meet in one person — a divine title and a royal throne — and the angel speaks both over a child not yet born.
Gabriel had already promised Zacharias a great son, John. The two announcements do not describe greatness in the same way.
The contrast between these two messages is worth noticing. John would be "great in the sight of the Lord." Of Jesus the angel said, "He shall be great." All John the Baptist's greatness depended on the Person whose herald he was. Jesus was great in Himself and of Himself. From where I write, I can see the shadow of a chestnut tree in the light of the rising sun. The shadow grows to a giant size. Yet the shadow does not show how big the tree is. It witnesses to the sun's rising and splendour. Such was John.
Where the ESV reads "Son of the Most High," the older translation used in the quotes below says "Son of the Highest." The title was not new. It had a long history among the people who heard it.
"The Highest." The Old Testament Elyon. It was the usual name for God among the Greek-speaking Jews scattered abroad. It appears again in verses 35 and 76.
The striking thing is who carries that name: a child about to be born.
Here we are told that He — the One who should be born — "should be great," and, born into this world, "should be called the Son of the Highest." He had been the Son of the Father before the world was. But this child, born on earth, would be called the Son of the Highest — such as He was down here. He would fully prove His right to that title by His acts, and by everything that showed what He was. It is a precious thought to us, and full of glory, that a child born of a woman rightly bears this name, "Son of the Highest." It is supremely glorious for One who is in the position of a man, and really was such before God.
The order of the angel's two statements matters.
He (not Mary) would be great, called "the Son of the Highest," a dignity far higher than could be given to Him by Mary, indeed an eternal dignity. Therefore the Lord God would give to Him the throne of His father David. First mentioned is His being Son of the Highest, His eternal deity; then Son of David, which involves His manhood, being born of Mary.
God gives this throne. The gift rests on birth-right and on God's own purpose.
But other things still were connected with the One who should be born. God would give Him the throne of His father David. Here again we plainly see that He is considered as born, as man, in this world. The throne of His father David belongs to Him. God will give it to Him. By right of birth He is heir to the promises — the earthly promises which, as to the kingdom, belonged to the family of David. But it would be according to the counsels and the power of God.
Joseph was not the child's real father, so how does David's line reach Him? Commentators differ over whose family record Luke traces, but not over the descent itself.
Whose line does Luke give us, Joseph's or Mary's? Some have long held it is Joseph's, as Matthew's is; others say it is Mary's. No one has yet settled the question. The Lord's Davidic descent is unquestionable, whichever view is adopted. Peter affirmed it (Acts 2:30), and Paul also (Acts 13:23; Rom. 1:3; 2 Tim. 2:8), and the Lord Himself declared it (Matt. 22:45; Mark 12:37; Luke 20:41; Rev. 22:16). The angel Gabriel's words to Mary (Luke 1:32) speak of it, and so does Zacharias in his song (1:69). Yet both knew — certainly Gabriel, and doubtless Zacharias — that Joseph was not the real father of the child about to be born. Mary's child was really David's seed.
Gabriel announces the throne. Announcing it is not the same as receiving it.
He was about to come as the Son of David according to the flesh, but He is also David's Lord. He is the One who spoke these words to the prophet Nathan. Of Him God announced: "the Lord God shall give unto Him the throne of His father David. And He shall reign forever and of His kingdom there shall be no end." That throne and that kingdom He has not yet received. He fills the Father's throne in the highest heaven.
- Great. John was great in the sight of the Lord. Jesus is great in Himself, and every other greatness only points to Him.
- Named. "The Most High" is the Old Testament name Elyon. The child born on earth is called His Son, and He proved that name by everything He did.
- Ordered. The angel names the eternal dignity first and the throne second: Son of the Most High, therefore Son of David.
- Given. God hands over the throne. It is His by right of birth, held by God's counsel and power.
- Awaited. David's true heir came through Mary's line. He has not taken that throne yet. He fills the Father's throne in heaven while the promise still stands.
and he shall reign over the house of Jacob for the ages, and of his kingdom there shall not be an end.
The angel's message to Mary ends with a throne, a people, and a length of time. It raises three questions: which kingdom is meant, who its subjects are, and how an endless reign fits a Saviour who suffered.
Christ does not take this reign for Himself. God gives it to Him, and He receives it as a man born into David's line.
Here again we see Him clearly: born into this world as a man. The throne of His father David belongs to Him. God will give it to Him. By right of birth He is heir to the promises. These are the earthly promises about the kingdom that belonged to David's family. But it would all come about by the counsels and the power of God. He would reign over the house of Jacob, not only over Judah. His would not be a weak, passing power with a short life. It would last throughout the ages.
The angel names the people He will rule: the house of Jacob, wider than Judah alone. Some writers take that name at face value.
Why should we not expect this word of the Lord, spoken by His angel, to be fulfilled? I cannot see any reason why I should doubt this, or any other part of God's word. The subjects, then, of His Kingdom will be the house of Jacob, not the Church of God.
Behind the angel's words stands God's older promise to David. That promise has not yet come true in Israel's history.
Again, "Your house and your kingdom shall be made sure forever before me. Your throne shall be established forever" (2 Sam. 7:16). God has never yet fulfilled this promise to Israel. The question is whether it will come true literally in their history, or spiritually in the Church. Nothing in the prophecy seems to point to the Church, and nothing in the Church seems to point to the prophecy.
The obvious objection is that Jesus never reigned. Writers answer it by dividing His two comings.
We all know full well that instead of reigning, He suffered when He was here before. But when He comes again, He comes to reign. He will reign over the house of Jacob, as we have seen in so many Scriptures. But more than that, as we have seen in many others, He will "have dominion from sea to sea, and from the River to the ends of the earth."
Jeroboam once seized ten parts of Israel's kingdom. Christ's reign carries no such weakness.
The foundations of His throne rest in the deep places of eternity. His sceptre carries the stamp of immortality, and His crown the stamp of incorruptibility. No Jeroboam will rise then to seize ten parts of the kingdom. It will be one undivided whole forever, under the peaceful rule of Him who is "gentle and lowly in heart."
Commentators differ over what "no end" covers. Davison reads it as a guarantee against any successor, not a claim about the eternal state.
after
It does not mean that the kingdom will go on forever in the eternal state. It means that it will not have a successor. Kingdoms exist to keep hostile powers in subjection as well as to protect their subjects. Indeed one is the outcome of the other. But there are no hostile powers in the eternal state, so the kingdom will not be necessary. This is clear from 1 Cor. 15:24-26.
Darby traces the same point back to Daniel's prophecy.
As Daniel had predicted, no one else would ever take it. It would never pass to another people. God would establish it by His counsels, which never change, and by His power, which never fails. Christ will exercise a royal rule that nothing can dispute. He will hand it over to God when all things are fulfilled, but nothing will ever tarnish its royal glory in His hands.
One question remains. Is this just an earthly throne like any other?
Even at its lowest level, how far His Kingdom is from being a mere human dominion!
- Given — The throne is not taken by force. God gives it to the One born as heir of David's line.
- Given to a people — He will rule the house of Jacob, which writers keep distinct from the Church.
- Given, but delayed — At His first coming He suffered instead of reigning; the reign belongs to His return.
- Given without rival — No Jeroboam divides it, and no successor replaces it.
- Given without limit — Even in its most earthly form, this rule is far more than human dominion.
But Mary said to the angel, How shall this be, since I know not a man?
Gabriel has told Mary she will bear a son, and she answers with one honest question: how? Much hangs on how we read it — whether she doubted, and how this Child came into the world.
Earlier in the chapter, a man questioned an angel and lost his speech for it. Mary's words sound similar, yet Gabriel answers her instead of rebuking her.
And Mary said to the angel, "How will this be, since I am a virgin?" She does not doubt; she asks with confidence. So there is no striking dumb and no sign of unbelief, as with Zacharias, who asked, "How shall I know this?" There may be a question in the spirit that needs an answer but shows no lack of faith. There might be another not so different in form which really sprang from unbelief. God does not judge by appearance, but by the heart.
One writer weighs her question against the request of Zacharias.
Zacharias had constantly asked for a son. It was only a question of God's goodness and power to grant his request, and God's clear declaration brought him to a point where he had only to trust it. He did not trust God's promise. It was only the exercise of God's extraordinary power within the natural order of things. Mary asks, with holy confidence, since God has so favoured her, how the thing is to be accomplished, outside the natural order. Of its accomplishment she has no doubt.
Her question exposes what she took for granted about the incarnation — God the Son entering the world as a man.
When the angel Gabriel announced the honour about to be given to her in the great work of incarnation, she asked, not in a spirit of scepticism but of honest ignorance, "How will this be, since I am a virgin?" Clearly she thought that the birth of this glorious Person, who was about to appear, would follow the ordinary principles of generation. In God's great goodness, her thought becomes the occasion for developing much valuable light on the central truth of incarnation.
Commentators differ on what exactly puzzled her. Another points to the titles she has just heard.
The coming Child was to have David as His ancestor and yet be the Son of the Highest! She did not ask for a sign, since she accepted the angel's words, but she did ask for an explanation.
Her asking did not stop the plan. It drew out the fullest answer in the passage.
Mary replied to the angel, "How will this be?" What was promised had to happen outside the order of nature. Even so, distrust did not prompt her question. We see this because God allowed Gabriel to give a full and complete answer to her question. That answer reveals two things: the miraculous conception of our blessed Lord, and that the Child so born should be called the Son of God.
Mary's description of herself also settles an old question about translation.
The Old Testament was carefully translated into Greek in the version commonly called the Septuagint, and our Lord quoted from it again and again. That translation plainly understood the word "virgin" as Mary herself shows in Luke 1:34. It rendered the word parthenos, which does mean "virgin."
Some have read her words as a vow of lifelong virginity. One writer rejects that, since an earlier verse in the chapter rules it out:
Schanz abandons his usually sensible interpretation by taking Mary's words as a vow of virginity, which verse 27 rules out.
If the child had come the ordinary way Mary assumed, everything would be different.
Sinful men have sinful children… Does it matter, then, or does it not, how the Lord was born into this world? Had He come by natural generation, would He not have been like every other man? To deny the virgin birth is to deny His pre-existence in the Godhead. It also denies the holiness of His Manhood. Without these two great truths about His glorious Person, He could not have been the Saviour.
- Ask. Mary's "how" is faith seeking light, not doubt demanding proof. God reads the heart, not the wording.
- Contrast. Zacharias would not trust a promise inside nature's order. Mary never doubted one outside it.
- Assume. Her question shows she expected an ordinary birth. That mistake became the occasion for light on the incarnation.
- Answer. Because she asked in faith, God let Gabriel answer in full: the miraculous conception, and the Child called the Son of God.
- Depend. Her own words about herself anchor the virgin birth. Deny that birth and you deny His pre-existence and the holiness of His Manhood — and He could not be the Saviour.
And the angel answering said to her, [The] Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and power of [the] Highest overshadow thee, wherefore the holy thing also which shall be born shall be called Son of God.
Gabriel told Mary she would bear a son who would reign forever. She asked how, since she had no husband. This verse is his answer — how a virgin could bear a child, and why that child would be called Son of God.
Zechariah had asked a similar question earlier in the chapter and lost his speech for it. Mary does not.
She does not doubt; she asks in trust. So she is not struck silent, and there is no sign of unbelief — unlike Zechariah, who asked, "How shall I know this?" A question may rise in the spirit and need an answer, yet show no lack of faith. Another question, close to it in wording, might spring from unbelief. God does not judge by appearance, but by the heart.
The verse says two things about what God will do. One writer reads them as two distinct acts, not one act stated twice.
"The Holy Spirit will come upon you" means that the Holy Spirit produced the human nature of our Lord in the virgin by a creative act. And so He had a completely holy nature. "And the power of the Most High will overshadow you." This is not a repetition of the first statement. It means that the Son of God, who is the Most High, overshadowed the virgin. He united Himself with the human nature the Spirit had prepared. He is called "that holy thing" in His very being, because He fits into no class.
Commentators differ. Others read the whole verse as one act of divine power: "it was not to be nature, but divine power" (William Kelly).
Older translations render the phrase "that holy thing." That word choice separates this child from the first man God made.
There is no taint at all in that "Son of Man." It does not say "that innocent thing," but "that holy thing." The first man before the fall was innocent and guiltless. But that condition was only negative, and it was unstable. He was of the earth, earthy — made of dust; with a spirit, but a creature, and nothing more. The second Man is out of heaven. He was "holy," and had a positive, inherent, lasting character, utterly incapable of sin. His positive holiness came from the direct, divine work of the Spirit in His incarnation, apart from fallen nature.
This birth did not simply add one more descendant to Adam's family.
When the fullness of time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of woman (Gal. 4:4), yet conceived under the direct action of the Holy Spirit (Luke 1:35). That is why, although the Deliverer came by the woman, He was not an ordinary son of Adam at all. The virgin birth means that the Lord Jesus, while truly Man, was yet a Man of a new order.
The word "therefore" ties the name to the miracle just described.
"Therefore the child to be born will be called holy — the Son of God," and not just Son of Man. This is very important. "Son of God" is a title that belongs to our Lord in His divine glory before He became a man, and here too. When He became a man, He did not stop being the Son of God. As incarnate He was still the Son of God. And the same was true when He rose from the dead. So the title belongs to Him in all three conditions in which Scripture shows our Lord: Son of God as a divine Person; Son of God when He became a man; Son of God risen from the dead and gone to heaven.
What this verse teaches is narrower than the full doctrine of the Son:
It is not here the doctrine of the eternal relationship of Son with the Father. The Gospel of John, the letter to the Hebrews and the letter to the Colossians establish this precious truth and show how important it is. But here it is the One born by the miraculous conception who, on that ground, is called the Son of God.
This verse does Luke's work, not John's.
The power of the Holy Spirit did what would otherwise have been impossible. "That holy thing" born of the virgin was the "Son of God," even as to His humanity. This does not by itself declare what John declares. It is not the same as the Word becoming flesh. Luke's is the Gospel of the Manhood, as John's is of the Deity of the Lord. Both sides are essential to His proper glory.
- Question — Mary's "how" came from faith, not doubt, and God answered it fully; He reads the heart behind the words.
- Power — The conception was not nature at work but God at work: a creative act of the Holy Spirit.
- Holy — He is holy, not merely innocent. Adam could lose his innocence; nothing could touch this holiness.
- Name — "Therefore" links the name Son of God to the miracle. Yet the title was His before He became man, and His again when He rose.
- New — Born of a woman yet not of Adam's line, He is a Man of an entirely new order.
And behold, Elizabeth, thy kinswoman, she also has conceived a son in her old age, and this is the sixth month to her that was called barren
Gabriel has just told Mary that she will bear the Son of God. Then, without being asked, he adds a second piece of news: an elderly relative is already six months pregnant. Why does the angel attach this quieter miracle to the greater one, and what does the pairing of these two mothers teach?
The verse fixes the timing of Gabriel's visit to Mary by the calendar of Elizabeth's pregnancy. That detail marks a shift in how God was dealing with people.
God sends the angel Gabriel in the sixth month of Elizabeth's pregnancy with a more important message. After the long silence of centuries, heaven speaks again. In Luke it speaks in a closer way than in Matthew, where Joseph receives the messages, and receives them in a dream. Here we have open, face-to-face speech, and the most important message comes not in the temple but in a private home. God is coming near in His grace; and the nearer He comes, the more fully He reveals Himself.
Gabriel offers Elizabeth's case as evidence. One writer puts the reason plainly:
The less wonderful birth is set before her to strengthen her faith to believe in the more wonderful birth. "For nothing will be impossible with God" (Luke 1:37).
Mary had asked how this could happen. Commentators separate her question from the doubt of Zacharias, Elizabeth's husband.
What God promised had to be outside the order of nature. Even so, unlike Sarah and Zacharias, it was not distrust that prompted her question. We see this because God let Gabriel give her a full and complete answer… But to strengthen the faith God had already given her, He also sent Gabriel to tell her of His grace to her relative Elizabeth. "For," he said, giving the unchanging basis of all belief, "nothing will be impossible with God."
Both women conceive by God's power, yet the two births are not on the same level. The angel even names Elizabeth as the one "called barren." One writer shows how far apart the two children stand:
John comes as a child of promise. A special gift of God renewed a natural power in his mother. But Jesus comes as Son of God, born by no natural power at all, but by the Holy Spirit, beyond nature altogether. One is the child of a barren wife, the other the child of a virgin… Elizabeth was the mother of the saved, Mary the mother of the Saviour. Elizabeth's child was the sanctified, Mary's the Sanctifier.
The same writer explains why the child of a barren woman pictures the saved. It "tells us of God's grace and gift to those who were found powerless and lacking."
Mary now had two impossible pregnancies to think about, not one.
Gabriel's visit then ended. But first he told Mary that her relative Elizabeth was expecting a child, news she was clearly hearing for the first time. The barren woman was to become fruitful. The virgin was to bear a son. Both were miracles.
Gabriel stops there and says nothing more about Elizabeth's child.
He needed to add nothing more about John. This was enough to move Mary to visit Elizabeth, which was what God intended. Mary's simple faith is beautiful. She gladly took the place of a servant and accepted Gabriel's word, unlike Zacharias, who did not believe (v.38).
The ESV calls Elizabeth Mary's "relative." Older translations say "cousin." People often stretch this family link further than the text allows.
John the Baptist and our Lord were not first cousins, though people often say so by mistake. Mary and Elizabeth were the cousins, as we read in Luke 1:36… God did not send him to identify a relative, but to identify the Son of God, and to bear witness of this to Israel.
- Nearness. After centuries of silence, heaven speaks again. Not in the temple, but in an ordinary home, face to face. God was coming near in grace.
- Evidence. Gabriel gives Mary the lesser wonder to strengthen her faith for the greater one. Six months of it are already there for her to go and see.
- Difference. Elizabeth's son came by a natural power renewed. Mary's Son came beyond nature altogether: mother of the saved, and mother of the Saviour.
- Response. Mary hears just enough to stir her, and answers as a servant. Her question was inquiry, not the distrust of Zacharias.
- Limit. The kinship between the two women is real. But God sent John to identify the Son of God, not a relative.
for nothing shall be impossible with God.
Gabriel has just told Mary that she will have a son, though she has no husband, and pointed her to her relative Elizabeth, who is pregnant in old age. His closing sentence is the ground under the whole announcement, and commentators read it as a word about God's power and as the base of Mary's faith.
The words come at the end of a message that no ordinary birth could explain. One writer treats them as the settling of the whole matter:
This last statement from the angel "who stands in the presence of God" needs no comment. It drives away all doubt for those who will believe. The birth of the Saviour was miraculous, it was by God's power, it was God's work. No man had any part in it; the Son of Mary was holy and undefiled. He was the Son of God... Unbelief says it is against every law of nature, and impossible. Faith answers in the words of Gabriel, who knew God's power well: "nothing will be impossible with God."
Mary had asked how such a thing could happen. One commentator says her faith was already there, and explains why the angel added the news about Elizabeth:
She already had God-given faith. To strengthen it, God sent Gabriel to tell her of His grace to her cousin Elizabeth. "For," he said, giving the unchanging basis of all belief, "nothing will be impossible with God." God would not be God if this were not so; and, as the Lord Himself taught, "All things are possible for one who believes." Mary had learned this deep in her soul. Her answer shows it: "Behold, I am the servant" (the bondservant) "of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word."
Translations differ here because the Greek manuscripts differ. One writer, comparing revised versions with the older English text, notes the change at this exact point:
In verse 37 there is a bold change of reading in the Greek, which gives the wording "no word from God shall be without power."
Read that way, the promise covers more. God can do anything. And every word God speaks carries its own power to happen.
The word Gabriel used is not limited to Mary's situation. One writer applies it beyond the birth itself:
Admit superhuman power, and all difficulty vanishes. "Nothing," we read, "will be impossible with God" — "no thing," neither the virgin birth, nor the raising of the dead!
The same writer presses the point at the level of physical law: "His power is infinite, and no physical law is beyond that power. Nature is clearly subservient to the will of its Maker."
Gabriel had brought a similar promise to Zacharias earlier, and Zacharias had not believed it. He could not speak until his son was born. One commentator traces how that ended:
On the eighth day after the child's birth the father could speak again. He praised God, and prophecy through a human voice returned. It had been silent for ages. Now it burst out afresh as Zacharias blessed God for visiting and redeeming His people... His unbelief had vanished. Nothing will be impossible with God, Gabriel had said, and to that Zacharias added his Amen.
If nothing is impossible with God, the practical question becomes how a person comes to rely on that. One writer connects the promise to the condition of the one who trusts it:
So faith links the believer to the almighty power of God and puts that power to work. We could even say it brings God Himself in to act for His people. That is why, in the words of our Lord, nothing is impossible to them. But never forget that faith is a real thing. It is a divine plant, and it only grows out of the soil of a broken will. First we must come to the end of ourselves and our resources. We must learn how helpless we are. Only then do we throw ourselves on God and depend fully on Him and His power.
- Power — Gabriel's sentence holds up the whole announcement. The birth "was by God's power, it was God's work." No human father had a part in it.
- Basis — One writer calls it "the unchanging basis of all belief," because "God would not be God if this were not so."
- Reach — The word is "no thing." Neither the virgin birth nor the raising of the dead lies outside it. Nature is under the will of its Maker.
- Reading — Some manuscripts give "no word from God shall be without power." Then the promise rests on what God has spoken, not only on what He can do.
- Response — Mary answered by calling herself the Lord's servant. Zacharias doubted first, then added his Amen. Faith like that grows only "out of the soil of a broken will."
And Mary said, Behold the bondmaid of [the] Lord; be it to me according to thy word. And the angel departed from her.
An angel has just told a young woman that she will bear a son who will be called the Son of God. Her answer is short, and it gives away everything: she calls herself the Lord's servant and asks only that His word be done.
Mary does not pick a title of honour. She uses the word for the lowest place in a household; older translations read "handmaid" or "bondmaid." She is not the first believing woman to use it of herself:
In Scripture these words often mean a female slave, as with Hagar the Egyptian, Genesis 25:12. But women also used them of themselves as a term of humility. Hannah spoke this way to the Lord and to Eli, 1 Samuel 1:11, 16, 18. Abigail spoke this way to David, 1 Samuel 25:24-41. And Mary and Elizabeth used it as handmaids of the Lord, Luke 1:38, 48.
By taking that place she claims nothing and controls nothing. One writer sees this as the very thing that makes her great:
The angel tells her of the blessing God's almighty power has given to Elizabeth. Mary bows to the will of her God, the submissive vessel of His purpose. In her piety she sees a height and greatness in these purposes. They left her one place only: subjection to the will of God, as their passive instrument. This was her glory, through the favour of her God.
Earlier in the chapter Zacharias questioned an angel, and God struck him dumb. Mary asked a question too, and nothing like that happened to her. The difference lies in the heart, not in the wording:
"But Mary said to the angel, How will this be, since I am a virgin?" She does not doubt. She asks with confidence. So God does not strike her dumb, and there is no sign of unbelief, as there was with Zacharias, who asked, "How shall I know this?" A question may rise in the spirit and need an answer, yet show no lack of faith. Another question could look much the same and still spring from unbelief. God does not judge by appearance. He judges the heart.
Her answer is not the calm of someone with nothing to lose. It cost her, and one writer shows how faith acts when the cost is plain:
In all the range of Scripture there is no instance of a more exalted faith nor of a more complete submission. She could not be blind to what this might cost her in this world. Matthew tells us that she became an object of suspicion and inner trouble even to Joseph. But faith never reasons and is never confused. It counts on God. If He calls us to any service, or to walk in any path, He will both guide and sustain us, whatever the trial or persecution. The calm of a soul which rests in the will of God is beyond words, and this was Mary's inheritance at this moment.
Her closing words tie her whole future to what God has said. What comes of it is the Son of God coming in flesh:
To Mary the whole thing was supernatural. Her faith marks her as a true-hearted and dependent saint. She could only say, "Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word" (v. 38); and the angel departed from her. She places herself completely in the hands of God, to be His honoured vessel for the incarnation — the coming in flesh of "that holy thing," "Son of the Highest" and "Son of God."
The title she takes here is the one she keeps. Scripture's last picture of her shows nothing changed:
This is the last time Scripture shows Mary the mother of Jesus. She simply takes her place with the rest, humbled by God's grace towards her, not exalted by it. What a grief it would have been to her to know the place a church that had fallen away from the truth would later give her! No one prays to her, and she does not even lead in prayer. She remains what she was at the beginning, "the handmaid of the Lord," and with this she passes out of the history.
At the wedding in Cana her one recorded instruction points away from herself:
And Mary understood it, saying to the servants, Whatever He says to you, do it. She was still the meek bond-servant of the Lord... He, not she, is the One above all to be heard... She herself could not save others, nor plead for them as He does. She needed to pray herself, since she was a sinner like others, to be saved by faith.
- Servant — Mary's word for herself means a household slave. Hannah and Abigail used it too, as a term of humility.
- Servant asks — Her question carried no unbelief. God judges the heart, not the form of the words, so no rebuke came.
- Servant yields — Bowing to God's will left her nothing of her own. That was her glory.
- Servant pays — Even Joseph suspected her. Faith does not reason out the cost; it counts on God to guide and sustain.
- Servant stays — At the end she is praying with others, not prayed to. She is still what she called herself here: the Lord's handmaid.
And Mary, rising up in those days, went into the hill country with haste, to a city of Judah,
Gabriel had just told Mary that God had also visited her relative Elizabeth, and Mary sets out at once for the hill country. Two questions sit in this short verse: why the hurry, and why Elizabeth?
The urgency here is not panic. Commentators tie it to the message she had just heard, and to what God meant to do through the meeting.
Mary then travels to Judea in haste to visit her cousin Elizabeth. Notice that her haste here is good, because it rested on the word of God given to her. The Lord had planned this visit to strengthen and encourage faith in both of these favoured women.
The journey did something for Mary herself.
Mary had asked for no sign to be given her. Yet she "drinks from the brook by the way," and goes "with haste," as one who feels the weight of what God had told her. She goes to find refreshment with her relative, who is joined to her in faith, and now joined to her by this new work of God as well — the work that is starting to bring in the blessing they had long waited for.
Mary had a secret too large to hold alone, and only one person on earth could share it.
Whenever God's grace works in people's souls, it draws them together in the bonds of divine love. That is how it was with Mary and Elizabeth. Gabriel had revealed to Mary that God had also visited her cousin Elizabeth. Mary sensed what God was going to do through her — whether or not she grasped the full meaning of the message she had received. She came to feel that there was one friend to whom she could pour out her soul.
What Mary carried was not just her own good news. It was news about God, and it touched promises she already knew well.
She was carrying news that weighed on her — news of God's faithfulness to His word, and of His unquenchable love for His people. She could not do anything but go "in haste." What thoughts must have filled her adoring heart as she hurried on her errand! She was one of the holy women of Judah, and she knew well the scriptures that spoke of the coming King and the glory of His kingdom. Scriptures such as these: "How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him who brings good news, who publishes peace, who brings good news of happiness, who publishes salvation, who says to Zion, 'Your God reigns'" (Isaiah 52:7); or again, "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your king is coming to you" (Zechariah 9:9).
No crowd watched this meeting, and that is part of its beauty.
There is nothing more beautiful of its kind than this picture of the fellowship between these devout women. The world did not know them, yet God used them as instruments of His grace to carry out His purpose, and the results are glorious and endless. They keep out of sight, moving in a scene where nothing enters but piety and grace. But God is there, as little known to the world as these poor women were, preparing and carrying out the very thing that angels long to understand in its depths. This takes place in the hill country, where these devout relatives lived.
The place itself carries a moral note.
These devoted women are away from the world, in "a town in Judah," high ground that pictures a high moral level. There they share a precious secret that God Himself has given them. Humility and contented lowliness run through their whole conversation.
These two women came from different social worlds.
Now Elizabeth and Mary come together. I know of no more beautiful example in Scripture of communion in the Holy Spirit than this. Elizabeth was the wife of the high priest; Mary was engaged to a carpenter. Perhaps they would never have met but for this. Now they meet not just in the flesh, but in the spirit... Communion arises when people forget the flesh and act only in the spirit. Elizabeth did not grudge, and Mary was not proud. Elizabeth kept a meek place, and Mary a humble one. There is plenty of social contact today, but too little communion, even among the people of God.
- Word first. Mary moved because God had spoken. Haste is right when it obeys a word already given.
- Gift shared. Grace draws hearts together. Mary looked for the one friend who could receive what God had given her.
- Scripture stirred. She carried news of God's faithfulness. The King the prophets promised was coming.
- Hidden ground. The hill country hid them from the world, yet God was there, working out purposes angels long to understand.
- Real communion. A priest's wife and a carpenter's bride-to-be met with no pride and no grudging. Rank neither creates such fellowship nor blocks it.
and entered into the house of Zacharias, and saluted Elizabeth.
A young woman walks into a house in the hill country and greets her older relative. It is one of the most ordinary sentences in the Gospels. Yet this greeting makes an unborn child leap. It fills Elizabeth with the Holy Spirit. It draws out her confession that Mary's child is her Lord.
Writers trace the visit back to how Mary received the angel's message.
Mary's meek acceptance points to that acceptance of faith which marks her out for all time as blessed among women in her unique position. It also makes her the example for everyone who receives the testimony of God and bows to it. The announcement itself took place between Mary and the angel alone. Now we see the fellowship of these two holy women.
Of all the doors in Israel, Mary went to this one.
Whenever there is a work of grace in souls they are drawn together in the bonds of divine love. So it was with Mary and Elizabeth. Gabriel had revealed to Mary that God had also visited her cousin Elizabeth. Mary carried a sense of what God would accomplish through her — whether or not she understood the full meaning of the message she had received. It made her feel that there was one friend to whom she could pour out her soul.
One writer notes what Mary never asked for.
Before leaving, however, he had pointed her to Elizabeth as a sign of the power of God at work, to which nothing is impossible. Mary had asked for no sign. Still she "drinks from the brook by the way," and goes "with haste," as one feeling the weight of what had been told her. She goes to seek refreshment with her relative — a woman linked to her in faith, and now also by this new work of God which was beginning to bring about the long-awaited blessing.
Mary's words are not recorded. Elizabeth's answer is — and it shows she knew what no one had told her.
Elizabeth had surely learned from her husband Zechariah that her son John was to be the forerunner of the Messiah, the messenger of the Lord promised by Malachi (Mal. 3:1). But of whom, and when, was the Messiah to be born? These questions were still unsolved for her and her husband. Then, suddenly, they were answered. Mary crossed the threshold of her house, greeted her cousin, and the expectant mother of John learned who was to be the mother of her Lord... She knew both Mary's expectations and Mary's faith. When and how did she learn all this? Mary had not had time to speak of it. No whisper of it carried by human means had reached the hill country of Judea. Mary evidently, as Matthew teaches us, had not even told Joseph, to whom she was betrothed (Matt. 1:18-19). How did Elizabeth know? She told it, as only she could: "For behold, when the sound of your greeting came to my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy" (Luke 1:44). The mother of her Lord was there.
Notice where the honour lands, and where Mary keeps herself.
Mary then arises, enters the house of Zechariah and greets her relative Elizabeth. This gives occasion to the wonderful homage paid even by the unborn babe, Elizabeth's child, to her who was the predestined mother of the Messiah — homage in honour of the Messiah Himself. As a result, Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. She breaks out in acknowledgment of the place God had given Mary: "And why is this granted to me that the mother of my Lord should come to me?" It is remarkable how her words own that even the child not yet born was the Lord. We find just the same thing with Mary herself. She has no notion of being taken out of the place of a needy sinner.
The visit also shows what God's work had done to Mary herself.
The message of the angel was not without fruit in the heart of Mary; and by her visit to Elizabeth she goes to acknowledge the wonderful dealings of God. The piety of the virgin shows itself here in a touching way. God's marvellous intervention humbled her, instead of lifting her up. She saw God in what had taken place, and not herself. The greatness of these wonders brought God so near to her that she lost sight of herself.
- Grace moves. Where God works in souls, He draws them together; Mary's journey is that pull in motion.
- Grace seeks company. She went to the one friend to whom she could pour out her soul. She asked for no sign; faith went, and found refreshment.
- Grace speaks. No one recorded her words. Yet the greeting told Elizabeth what Mary had not even told Joseph.
- Grace crowns the Child. The homage stirred by that greeting was honour to the Messiah. Mary never steps out of the place of a needy sinner.
- Grace hides the vessel. The wonder humbled her rather than raising her; God stood so near that she disappeared from her own sight.
And it came to pass, as Elizabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elizabeth was filled with [the] Holy Spirit,
Mary greets her cousin Elizabeth, and two things happen at once: the unborn child stirs, and the Holy Spirit fills Elizabeth. How did Elizabeth know who had just arrived?
No one in the world was watching this meeting.
Nothing of its kind is more beautiful than this picture of these godly women together. The world did not know them. Yet they were the instruments of God's grace for carrying out His purpose, and the results are glorious and endless. They keep out of sight, in a scene where nothing enters but godliness and grace. But God is there. The world knew Him as little as it knew these poor women. And He was preparing and accomplishing what the angels long to explore in its depths.
Elizabeth's answer shows she already knows Mary's situation and Mary's faith. No messenger had brought the news.
Mary stepped into her house and greeted her cousin. So the expectant mother of John learned who was to be the mother of her Lord... She knew both Mary's expectations and Mary's faith. When and how did she learn all this? Mary had not had time to speak of it. No whisper of it carried by human means had reached the hill country of Judea. It seems Mary had not even told Joseph, her fiancé, as Matthew teaches us.
Luke gives the answer in the same verse.
What was it that made her address her young relative like that? We are not told that she had heard of the angel's visit to Mary, so how did she know what lay before her? The answer is that she "was filled with the Holy Spirit" (v. 41), and she spoke by divine inspiration.
Notice when this filling happens.
Here again we have filling with the Spirit before Pentecost, showing how distinct it is from sealing and baptism. With Elizabeth and Zacharias it was clearly like prophecy. Scripture even says that Zacharias prophesied. It was a special visit of the Spirit. For that time it gave them the power to speak their joy and praise in inspired words.
Scripture also says "full of the Holy Spirit." The two phrases are not the same.
"Full of the Holy Spirit" seems to tell us what usually marked a person's life... "Filled with the Spirit" is different. Scripture uses it of people God takes up for His service, whether for a longer or a shorter time. You can see examples in Elisabeth and Zacharias (Luke 1:41, 67), in the company at Pentecost, and in Peter and Paul.
This was more than a mother's ordinary feeling. It was the first homage paid to Jesus by a human being.
And earlier still, while yet unborn, He was worshipped, I may say, by the leaping of the child in the womb of Elizabeth, at the greeting of Mary.
That first testimony set the pattern for John's whole life.
Already in his mother's womb he gives his first testimony to the presence of Him who was to come. Then he is kept in the desert until the day he appears publicly to Israel.
The Spirit's power here did not puff Elizabeth up.
Here the living power of the Spirit of God comes with a lowly, humble spirit. It finds delight in the blessing of another, and recognises that Mary is to be the mother of the Lord.
- Greeting — An ordinary hello starts it all. The world sees nothing, but God is there, working out His purpose.
- Leap — The unborn John answers first. He gives his earliest testimony to the One who was coming, before he can speak a word.
- Filling — The Holy Spirit fills Elizabeth long before Pentecost. This is a special visit that gives inspired speech, and it differs from sealing and baptism.
- Voice — Her words are revelation, not information. No one had told her who Mary was carrying.
- Lowliness — The Spirit's power shows itself in humility. Elizabeth takes joy in someone else's blessing.
and cried out with a loud voice and said, Blessed [art] *thou* amongst women, and blessed the fruit of thy womb.
Mary has just heard she will bear the Messiah, and she goes to the hill country to visit her relative Elizabeth. The Holy Spirit fills Elizabeth, and she cries out these words — but where did they come from, and how much honour do they give Mary?
Elizabeth knows Mary's news before Mary has said a word about it. No one could have carried it to her:
She knew both Mary's expectations and Mary's faith. When and how did she learn all this? Mary had not had time to speak of it. No whisper of it carried by human messenger had reached the hill country of Judea. Mary evidently, as Matthew teaches us, had not even told Joseph, to whom she was betrothed.
The answer is in the verse just before: the Holy Spirit filled her. That filling had a purpose:
The Spirit filled her so that she could speak the inspired words she said to Mary: "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb."
Elizabeth's opening words are not her own invention. Gabriel had already greeted Mary in the same terms. That repetition is the point:
We see at once that Elizabeth, as one "filled with the Holy Spirit," is in complete agreement with the mind of God about Mary. Gabriel had said to her, "Blessed are you among women," and Elizabeth now says, "Blessed are you among women," adding, "and blessed is the fruit of your womb." God's power opened her eyes, so she saw as God saw. She declares His own estimate of the one He had chosen for this singular favour.
The blessing's second half turns from the mother to the Child in her womb:
It is remarkable how beautifully Elizabeth owns that even the child not yet born was the Lord. We find just the same thing with Mary herself. She has no notion of being taken out of the place of a needy sinner. And the miraculous birth of John does not lessen Elizabeth's sense of the Messiah. It adds to it.
Elizabeth was carrying a miracle son of her own. Still, she takes the lower place, and one writer draws the lesson:
Herself the object of God's favour, she still took the lowest place before the one who was to become the mother of her Lord. Let this instruction sink deep into our hearts: when the Spirit of God is working in souls, He banishes all envy, strife, and jealousy. Love then flows out freely, and humility is the fruit of love. Then she described the effect Mary's greeting had on her, and proclaimed a third kind of blessedness. Mary was blessed as the object of God's sovereign favour. She was blessed as the vessel for the incarnation of our Lord. And she was blessed because of her faith.
Writers weigh the exact wording here, because people have stretched it far. The quote below uses an older translation of the angel's greeting in verse 28, where the ESV reads "O favored one":
The angel tells her she is "highly favoured" (Luke 1:28). Could any woman have a higher favour than to be the mother of our Lord according to the flesh? "Blessed are you among women" is the angel's greeting. "Blessed" she certainly was. Note, it does not say "Most blessed." The language is restrained.
In her own reply a few verses later, Mary calls God her Saviour:
Though the mother of our Saviour, she herself found her Saviour in God.
Later another woman calls out something very like Elizabeth's words. Jesus answers by pointing elsewhere:
A woman, alive to the joy of having a son like Jesus, declares aloud the value of such a natural family tie to Him. The Lord puts this blessing, as He did in the case of Mary, on those who heard and kept His word.
- Filled — No one had told Elizabeth Mary's news. The Spirit filled her so that she could speak these words.
- Echoed — She repeats Gabriel's own greeting. Her verdict on Mary is God's verdict, not a relative's warm welcome.
- Owned — The blessing runs past the mother to the unborn Child, whom she calls her Lord.
- Freed — Where the Spirit works, envy goes. Elizabeth rejoiced in another woman's honour instead of guarding her own.
- Shared — Mary was blessed as chosen, as the vessel, and for her faith. And Jesus later held out a blessing to anyone who hears God's word and keeps it.
And whence [is] this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
Elizabeth is the older woman, and she is expecting a son of her own. Yet when her young relative walks in, she treats the visit as an honour she cannot account for. Her question turns on two words: who is "my Lord," and why should His mother come to her?
Mary's child is not yet born. Elizabeth already speaks of Him as her Lord.
Elizabeth, filled with the Holy Spirit, breaks out into an acknowledgment of the place God had given Mary. "And why is this granted to me that the mother of my Lord should come to me?" It is remarkable how beautifully she acknowledges that even the child not yet born was the Lord.
That confession came before He entered the world.
The One these women spoke of, the Babe of Bethlehem, will soon be acknowledged as supreme in the universe. But before His birth, before He came into this world in lowly Manhood, Elizabeth's words already bore testimony to His supremacy — "my Lord."
In that world "Lord" was also an ordinary word of respect between people. The same word does far more work here.
These words are usually translated "lord." People use them as a term of respect between one person and another… Scripture gives the title "Lord" to God (Ps. 90:1, Adonai). In the New Testament it gives the same title to the Lord Jesus, not only as a term of respect, but as owning His constituted lordship (Acts 2:36; Phil. 2:11). For the Christian He is the Lord above all, eclipsing every other, and the Christian delights to claim Him as "My Lord."
Because the name carries that much, it is not one to handle casually.
How beautiful the language of the older woman calling the Virgin "the mother of my Lord." Surely this was a great revelation she received. With holy reverence we also should use that worthy Name. It has been well said, "Let us remember the deep meaning of the words 'the Lord' and beware of using them lightly and carelessly."
Elizabeth names a secret Mary has had no chance to tell her. So where did she learn it?
Mary crossed the threshold of Elizabeth's house and greeted her cousin. The expectant mother of John then learned who was to be the mother of her Lord… She knew both Mary's expectations and Mary's faith. Mary had not had time to speak of it. No whisper of it had reached the hill country of Judea by any human means. Mary clearly, as Matthew teaches us, had not even told Joseph, to whom she was betrothed (Matt. 1:18-19). How did Elizabeth know?
Nothing in the account says that anyone told her.
What was it that made her address her young relative like that? We are not told that she had heard of the angel's visit to Mary, so how did she know what lay ahead of her? The answer is that she "was filled with the Holy Spirit" (v. 41), and she spoke by divine inspiration.
Elizabeth had God's favour on her own life. Still she puts herself below the younger woman.
With her eyes opened by the power of God, she saw as God saw. She speaks God's own estimate of the one He had chosen for this singular favour. Filled with the Spirit, she also acknowledged with meekness and humility that the grace of God had lifted Mary high… She was herself an object of God's favour. Yet she took the lowest place before the one who was to become the mother of her Lord.
Mary answers Elizabeth moments later. Her reply shows how she took the honour given her.
Mary had no thought of exaltation. She says, "all generations will call me blessed," but not a blesser. She was the object of blessing, not the giver or mediator of it. "He who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is His name" — not a word of her own. "And His mercy is for those who fear Him from generation to generation" — not for those who pray to or worship me.
Both women keep their eyes on the same Person, not on each other.
Humility and contented lowliness mark their whole conversation… He was the One who filled their vision… Mary herself is content to take the "humble estate" of a "servant." God's mighty thoughts were not to reach their completion in Mary. Someone else has well said of her — "she lost her place if she made anything of herself, but in truth she did not," a helpful word for today!
- Lord already. Before Bethlehem, before He was born, Elizabeth calls the unborn child her Lord.
- Lord revealed. No one told Elizabeth. The Holy Spirit filled her, so she saw as God saw and spoke by inspiration.
- Lord honoured. Because He is Lord, the older woman takes the lowest place before the younger. She asks why such a visit should come to her at all.
- Lord alone the blesser. Mary is the object of blessing, never its giver — called blessed by all generations, but "not a blesser."
- Lord mine. The Christian claims Him as "My Lord" — a name too weighty to use lightly.
For behold, as the voice of thy salutation sounded in my ears, the babe leaped with joy in my womb.
Two expectant mothers meet in the hill country, and neither child has been born yet. The first to welcome Jesus is the baby inside Elizabeth, who leaps at the sound of Mary's voice.
Nobody had told Elizabeth. Mary had only just arrived, and no news of her had reached the hill country.
Mary crossed the threshold of Elizabeth's house, greeted her cousin, and the expectant mother of John learned who was to be the mother of her Lord. We do not know what words Mary used, but we have her answer. It came from a woman filled with the Holy Spirit. She lifted up her voice with a loud cry. She knew both Mary's expectations and Mary's faith. When and how did she learn all this? Mary had not had time to speak of it. No whisper of it carried by human means had reached the hill country of Judea. How did Elizabeth know? She told it, as she alone could declare it: "For behold, when the sound of your greeting came to my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy." The mother of her Lord was there.
The baby's leap honoured Mary. But the honour behind it was for the Messiah she carried.
Mary then arises, enters the house of Zacharias and greets her relative Elizabeth. This gives occasion to the wonderful homage paid even by the unborn child, Elizabeth's son. He paid it to Mary, the chosen mother of the Messiah, in honour of the Messiah Himself. The result was that Elizabeth, filled with the Holy Spirit, breaks out into an acknowledgment of the place God had given Mary. "And why is this granted to me that the mother of my Lord should come to me?" It is remarkable how beautifully she owns that even the child not yet born was the Lord.
Years later John and Jesus would meet at the Jordan as men who had never met — John raised in Judea, Jesus in Galilee — and John would still know Him instantly. That instinct has a starting point in this verse.
On the Lord's approaching John to be baptized, John at once acknowledged Him — acknowledged Him without any introduction. There seems to have been in his soul some consciousness that this was He. He had, indeed, acknowledged Him even before He was born (Luke 1:44). The world knew Him not, but John knows Him, and so condemns the world.
John gave up wine, one of the ordinary pleasures men enjoy together. From the outside his life looked joyless. It was not.
He deprived himself of wine — the sign of joy to the heart of the natural man in the company of his equals. ... This passage shows him as set apart in a special way from everything that makes up the joy of a sociable man. The world, on seeing him, would no doubt have said, "He is a sad and gloomy man who hates people." What a mistake! The world knows only this natural joy. In the prophet's heart another joy took its place — the joy that communion with the Saviour gives.
Elizabeth had a child of her own coming. Her inspired words go to Mary's blessing instead.
As Mary entered the house and spoke, the baby in Elizabeth's womb leaped. Elizabeth, filled with the Holy Spirit, broke out in a short but beautiful prophecy. Here the living power of the Spirit of God goes together with a lowly humility. She finds delight in the blessing of another, and she recognizes that Mary is to be the mother of the Lord.
The greeting Mary got at the door did something for her own faith.
The greeting Mary received shows that her visit to Elizabeth was of the Lord. That greeting must have confirmed her faith in a remarkable way. As soon as Elizabeth heard her relative's greeting, it reminded her of her own condition. At the same moment the Holy Spirit filled her and moved her to proclaim the blessedness of the one whom the Lord had so honoured by His grace.
- Joy first. John leaped in the womb. It is the first honour Jesus received, and neither child had been born.
- Joy revealed. No messenger had reached the hill country. The Holy Spirit filled Elizabeth, and she knew who stood at her door.
- Joy confessed. Elizabeth worships instead of pointing to herself. She calls the unborn child "my Lord" and she delights in another woman's blessing.
- Joy sustained. John gave up the ordinary pleasures the world lives on. Communion with the Saviour gave him a different joy in their place.
- Joy that lasts. What began with a leap in the womb ended at the Jordan. There John knew Jesus with no introduction, while the world did not.
And blessed [is] she that has believed, for there shall be a fulfilment of the things spoken to her from [the] Lord.
Elizabeth ends her greeting with a word about Mary's faith, not about her honour. Mary is blessed because she believed God would do what He said. So what makes believing God's word a blessing? And how does it differ from the unbelief seen a few verses earlier, in this same house?
Elizabeth is not paying Mary the warm compliment of an older relative. Something else is at work in her words.
Notice at once that Elizabeth, "filled with the Holy Spirit," shares God's own mind about Mary. Gabriel had said to her, "Blessed are you among women." Elizabeth now says the same, and adds, "and blessed is the fruit of your womb." God had opened her eyes. She saw as God saw, and she spoke His own verdict on the woman He had chosen for this rare honour.
The greeting names more than one blessing, and this verse supplies the last of them. It rests on something Mary did — she took God at His word.
Mary was blessed as the object of God's sovereign favour. She was blessed as the one through whom our Lord came into the world as a man. And she was blessed because of her faith — a faith that rose above every obstacle and rested on the almighty power of God. Like Abraham, she did not waver at the promise of God through unbelief, but "found strength in faith," giving glory to God. She had taken a firm hold of God's word. She had no doubt that He would do what He had promised. She honoured God in this way, and now God gave her, through Elizabeth's lips, the assurance that the Lord's word to her would come true.
Mary had asked the angel how such a birth could happen. Commentators are careful to distinguish that question from unbelief.
God had shown Mary such favour that she asks with holy confidence how this would happen, since it lay outside the natural order. She has no doubt that it would happen — Elizabeth calls her the one who believed.
Elizabeth had watched her own husband, Zacharias, lose his speech because he did not believe. That memory gives her words their edge.
At the same time she acknowledges that God has shown special favour to Mary's soul. "Blessed is she who believed, for there will be a fulfilment of what was spoken to her from the Lord." Elizabeth knew that unbelief was what had struck her husband. She sets his failure against Mary's humble, believing heart.
The certainty is not in the strength of Mary's believing but in the source of the message. It came from the Lord Himself.
She calls Mary the mother of her Lord — the One at whose voice her own baby had leaped for joy. She declares her blessed as well for the faith that received God's message. And what the Lord had spoken to her would surely happen.
The blessing pronounced here honours Mary's faith. It does not lift her out of the ranks of those who need saving — her own song, moments later, says otherwise.
Mary was the mother of our Lord as a man. She was "blessed among women," chosen for the highest honour a woman could have. Yet in her song of praise she says, "my spirit rejoices in God my Savior" (Luke 1:47). If Mary had been sinless, she would have had no need of a Savior. But she did need one, just like the rest of us.
What Elizabeth commends is not unique to Mary. Anyone who rests on what God has said stands on the same ground.
Gabriel brought Mary a message from heaven, and she answered, "let it be to me according to Your word" (Luke 1:38). That answer is the language of everyone who rests on what God has said. How simple! How beautiful! Faith never makes itself an object. It looks up to the Lord and says, "I want no better guarantee of certain blessing than the one 'Your word' gives me."
- Word spoken. The certainty rests on the source. The Lord Himself spoke to Mary, so His word would stand.
- Word believed. Mary's question was about how, never about whether — asking God for understanding is not the same as doubting Him.
- Word doubted. God left Zacharias unable to speak because of his unbelief, in the very house Mary entered. Elizabeth sets his failure beside Mary's believing heart.
- Word confirmed. Elizabeth, filled with the Spirit, saw as God saw. Through her, God assured Mary that He would keep His promise.
- Word for us. Faith never makes itself the object. It asks no better guarantee than God's own word. That ground is open to anyone — even to Mary, who called God her Savior.
And Mary said, My soul magnifies the Lord,
Mary has been visiting Elizabeth, and their meeting ends in a song about God, not about herself. Her opening words make God great. The rest of the song shows what that costs the one who says it.
The song does not appear out of nowhere. It closes a visit where two believers talked together about what God was doing. One writer shows where such talk leads:
What freshness and joy the person of Christ brings into the fellowship of these saints! Souls overflow. Conversation turns into adoration. Those who talk with one another are bound to learn what worship is.
Mary speaks of her soul here, and of her spirit in the next line. One writer separates the two, and explains why she uses the title Lord:
Her soul (the center of her emotions and affections) magnified the Lord, Jehovah. Her spirit (the center of her understanding and intelligence) rejoiced in God her Savior. In verse 46 the title Lord shows her submission to His authority. In verse 47 she worships the supreme God who in grace became her Savior. She knew she was a sinner who needed His salvation, just as we all do.
Mary makes God large by keeping herself small. That is the hinge of the whole song:
She acknowledges God as her Saviour in the grace that has filled her with joy. She also owns her own low place — a picture of the condition of the remnant of Israel. That low place gave God's greatness its opening to act, with full testimony that everything came from Him. Whatever godliness suited the instrument He used — and Mary did have it — she was great only so far as she hid herself. For then God was everything... She would have lost her place by making something of herself, but she did not.
Another writer turns this into a lesson for every reader:
May we all take this blessed lesson to heart. Grace cannot have its full sway in our souls unless we take our true place of nothingness before God.
Many lift Mary far above the place she claims for herself. One writer weighs her own words about being called blessed:
It is remarkable how simply Scripture answered in advance the monstrous unbelief that lowers God as much as it lifts up a human being. Mary had no thought of exaltation. She says, "All generations shall call me blessed," but not a blesser. She was the object of blessing, not the giver or mediator of it. "For the Mighty One has done to me great things; and holy is His name" — not a word of her own. "And His mercy is to generations and generations to them that fear Him" — not to those who pray to or worship me.
Mary did not invent these phrases. One writer names where they came from:
The wonderful burst of praise from Mary's lips beautifully echoes the Old Testament Scriptures. This devout woman knew the Word of God. It filled her heart, and the Holy Spirit used that Word to shape her praise. Her song touches many Psalms, but it reminds us above all of Hannah's inspired song (1 Samuel 2). Notice also Mary's deep humility and her acknowledgment of the need of a Saviour.
What begins with "my soul" does not stay personal. One writer shows how her own mercy opens out into the mercy promised to a nation:
Where the Spirit of God does a real work in the souls of His people, their hearts rise to the source their blessing came from. So with Mary. Her first thought is the Lord who had visited her with such indescribable grace... The mighty action of the Holy Spirit merged her individuality into Israel for the moment, so she rejoices in Israel's God and Saviour. She does speak of herself in the next verse, but even then only as the chosen instrument of the blessing that was coming on Israel.
Writers often compare this song with Hannah's. One marks a difference in timing:
Mary, on the other hand, sees the deliverance as already accomplished — accomplished in the One who was about to be born.
- Small. Mary is great only while she hides herself. Then God is everything. Make something of yourself and you lose your place.
- Saved. She calls God her Saviour, owning herself a sinner who needed His salvation, as we all do.
- Submitted. Calling Him Lord is her surrender to His authority. Her soul's affections and her spirit's understanding move toward Him together.
- Scriptural. Her praise is an echo of the Old Testament she knew by heart — many Psalms, and above all Hannah's song.
- Shared. Generations call her blessed, but never a blesser. She receives the blessing; she does not give it. Her joy widens into Israel's promised mercy.
and my spirit has rejoiced in God my Saviour.
Mary's song rises in two lines, and the second adds a word the first does not have — "my Saviour." That one word shows where her joy came from, and it raises the question of what she knew about herself.
Verses 46 and 47 use two different words for Mary's inner life. One writer gives each word its own meaning.
Her soul (the center of her emotions and affections) magnified the Lord, Jehovah. Her spirit (the center of her understanding and intelligence) rejoiced in God her Saviour. In verse 46 she uses the title Lord, which shows her submission to His authority. In verse 47 she worships the supreme God, who in grace became her Saviour. She knew herself to be a sinner who needed His salvation, just as we all do.
Her whole inner being moves in one direction at once, which is what marks out a heart truly turned toward God.
Do we not see how soul and spirit act in unison in connection with a saint of God, and the aspirations and emotions Godward, lofty and pure?
The word "my" carries the verse. She does not sing of a Saviour for others. She claims One for herself.
We must not omit to notice that Mary spoke of "God my Saviour." Though the mother of our Saviour, she herself found her Saviour in God.
One writer presses this against the claim that Mary was born without sin.
Like all who are taught of God, she recognised her sinful state. She needed a Saviour, and she had found One in God Himself. The immaculate conception is the teaching that the Virgin Mary was born sinless. How can anyone hold it when she herself confessed she was a sinner in finding God as Saviour?
Her joy is not in what she is, but in what God is toward her.
She acknowledges God her Saviour in the grace that has filled her with such joy. At the same time she owns her utter littleness. The instrument God uses may be holy, and Mary was. Even so, she was great only as long as she hid herself, for then God was everything. If she had made something of herself, she would have lost her place. But she did not. God kept her there so that His grace would be fully shown.
The rest of the song keeps her in that place. Her own words rule out any move to make her a giver of blessing.
Mary had no thought of exaltation. She says, "All generations shall call me blessed," but not a blesser. She was the object of blessing, not the giver of it… "And His mercy is to generations and generations to those who fear Him" — not to those who pray to or worship me.
The words are personal, but they are not her own invention. She had filled her mind with Scripture.
The wonderful outburst of praise from Mary's lips is a beautiful echo of the Old Testament Scriptures. The devout Virgin knew the Word of God. Her heart was full of it, and the Holy Spirit used the Word to express her praise. Her song touches many Psalms, and above all it reminds us of Hannah's inspired song (1 Samuel 2).
One writer compares the two songs. Mary's reaches higher, and Hannah's loses nothing.
Hannah begins: "My heart rejoices in the Lord." Mary says: "My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior." The heart is tied more to earth and the body. The soul and spirit have closer links with heaven and eternity. But this makes the song of Hannah none the less perfect or profitable to us.
One writer reads Mary as speaking for more than herself. Her low estate pictures the condition of a whole people.
She owns her own low estate — a figure of the condition of the remnant of Israel. That low estate gave occasion for God's greatness to step in, with a full testimony that everything came from Himself.
She read her own case as a pattern of how God works.
In the mercy shown to her she saw a pledge. God will finally lift up those who fear Him and scatter the proud and mighty of this world… She had no thought of Israel deserving anything under the covenant of law. Everything depended on the covenant of promise. God was filling the hungry and sending the rich away empty. This is always God's way.
- Lowness — Mary's joy starts where she starts: at her own littleness. She was great only as long as she hid herself and let God be everything.
- Saviour — From that low place she claims God as my Saviour. That is the confession of someone who knows she is a sinner. It is why one writer says this verse disproves the teaching that she was born sinless.
- Whole — Soul and spirit move together toward God. One line submits to His authority. The next worships Him as Saviour.
- Scripture — She voices her joy in borrowed words. Her heart was full of the Psalms and of Hannah's song, and the Spirit used what she already knew.
- Wider — Her case shows God's way: the hungry filled, the rich sent away empty, the lowly lifted. Mercy rests on promise, never on deserving.
For he has looked upon the low estate of his bondmaid; for behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed.
God has looked on a lowly woman, and her answer is not to claim greatness but to name her smallness. In the same breath she says that every generation to come will call her blessed. The verse holds two things together: how small she was, and how lasting her honour would be.
One writer defended the translation "low estate" against a reviewer who wanted "humiliation":
According to the reviewer, the Greek word tapeinosis must be translated in Luke 1:48 as "humiliation." But those who may be supposed to know the language translate it "low estate," as the reader may see in the Revised Version and in the translations of Alford, Wordsworth, Darby, and others. It is plain, too, that Mary was speaking of her outward condition, not of the state of her soul, when she poured out her heart to God.
The second term she chooses for herself — "servant," older versions "handmaiden" — carries the same weight:
These words often refer in scripture to a female slave, as applied to Hagar the Egyptian, Gen. 25:12; but were also used by women themselves as a term of humility, as when Hannah spoke to Jehovah and to Eli, 1 Sam. 1:11, 16, 18; as Abigail to David, 1 Sam. 25:24-41; and by Mary and Elizabeth as handmaids of the Lord. Luke 1:38, 48.
Mary gives no reason why God chose her. She only says that He looked:
Her song is thankfulness for the grace and favour given to her, the lowly one, and it is tied to the hopes and blessing of Israel. I repeat it: Mary is great because she is nothing. Yet God has favoured her in a way that has no parallel, and all generations will call her blessed.
Her contentment with the low place has a reason:
She herself is content to take the "low estate" of a "handmaiden." God's mighty thoughts were not going to be fulfilled in Mary. "Jehovah's Christ" was in view, and in Him alone would God's eternal purpose and the establishing of universal blessing and glory be fulfilled. It has been well said of Mary by another — "she lost her place if she made anything of herself, but in truth she did not," a helpful word in the present day!
Mary receives blessing here. She does not hand it out. One writer notes how the wording guards in advance against a later error:
It is remarkable how simply Scripture has answered in advance the monstrous unbelief of man, which lowers God as much as it exalts a human being. Mary had no thought of exaltation. She says, "All generations will call me blessed," but not a blesser. She was the object of blessing, not the giver or mediator of it. "He who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is His name" [not a word of her own]. "And His mercy is for those who fear Him from generation to generation" [not that pray to or worship me].
Mary's song does not stop with her. Her own low place stands for Israel's:
It is true that she speaks of herself here. She says that God has regarded the low estate of His handmaiden (bondsmaid), and that from now on all generations will call her blessed. But even so, this is only as the chosen instrument of the blessing that was coming upon Israel. It was the thought of Israel's salvation out of their low estate that filled her soul.
One writer sets her honour beside the reputations of the world's powerful:
In verse 48 she recognizes His tender mercy and care for her in her low estate. Hers was an honour that would never fail to draw the respect of all generations. While the great and mighty of this world are forgotten, this lowly, humble woman has an honour that will never be forgotten.
Some people make far too much of that honour. Others ignore it. One writer answers both:
Christ once corrected a woman who called His mother blessed. At first sight His words might seem to clash with Mary's own inspired song. Did she not say that from now on all generations would call her blessed? … Mary was most highly favoured in the flesh, singled out by a supreme distinction. It is even possible that, in a proper desire to steer clear of Roman error, Protestants may have overlooked the remarkable honour given to the Virgin.
- Low — "Low estate" describes Mary's outward circumstances. "Servant" is the word used of a female slave. She names her smallness, not her merit.
- Looked — Everything starts with God looking at her. She was great, as one writer puts it, in being nothing.
- Blessed — She is the object of blessing, never the giver. She said generations would call her blessed, not pray to her.
- Beyond — God lifted her up as the chosen instrument of blessing for Israel, not as a private favour.
- Lasting — The world forgets its powerful, but it remembers this lowly woman. Her honour is real: do not inflate it, and do not ignore it.
For the Mighty One has done to me great things, and holy [is] his name;
These words come from Mary's song of praise. She does not turn the moment toward herself. She turns it toward God. Her words name two things about Him at once: the power that acted, and the holiness of the One who acted.
Mary names the power that acted. She never explains how it acted.
The way the overshadowing power of the Highest worked upon Mary is not described. She herself declared, "He who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is His name" (Luke 1:49). The Holy Spirit's work here is secret and beyond our searching. Even so, divine power made certain that the child born of Mary was called the Son of God.
The second half of the verse is not a new subject. It guards the first half, because power in the world is not a safe thing.
To God she also ascribes infinite power, the mighty One who dealt with her in such power as with no other. But she hurries to add, "and holy is His name." In the world, power knows nothing of holiness. God's power is different: it is sanctified — set apart — from every corrupting element. There too is the gentle, tender side of His character, showing mercy without ceasing to those who fear Him.
Mary puts herself on the receiving side. Her words leave her no room to pass blessing on to others.
It is remarkable how simply Scripture met man's monstrous unbelief in advance. That unbelief lowers God as much as it exalts a human being. Mary had no thought of exaltation. She says, "All generations shall call me blessed," but not a blesser. She was the object of blessing, not the giver or mediator of it. "For He who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is His name" [not a word of her own]. "And His mercy is for those who fear Him from generation to generation" [not that pray to or worship me].
God singled her out. That could have made her think more of herself. It did the opposite.
The marvellous intervention of God humbled her, instead of lifting her up. She saw God in what had taken place, not herself. The greatness of these marvels brought God so near her that she was hidden from herself. She yields herself to His holy will. But God fills too much of her thinking here to leave any room for self-importance.
The very next line moves from "me" to "those who fear him." What God did for her, she saw as the opening of blessing for her whole people.
The thought of Israel's salvation out of their low condition filled her soul when she said, "He who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is His name." She adds at once, "And His mercy is for those who fear Him from generation to generation." That shows it was God's chosen Israel that filled her mind.
Others hear in her words the joy of people who had waited long for this child:
So when at last the Christ of God became a man, there were those who were in harmony with heaven. They recognised that God had stepped in, and they could rejoice over the birth of the long promised heir. With joy Mary delights to own, "He who is mighty has done great things for me."
Her song is not something she invented on the spot. It echoes words she already knew, including the song of Hannah, a mother who also sang after God gave her a son.
The marvellous outburst of praise which comes from Mary's lips is a beautiful echo of the Old Testament Scriptures. She knew the Word of God; her heart was filled with it, and the Holy Spirit used the Word in the expression of her praise. Her words touch many Psalms, and above all they recall Hannah's inspired song (1 Samuel 2). Notice also Mary's deep humility and her acknowledgment of the need of a Saviour.
- Power. Mary traces the "great things" to "He who is mighty." Divine power made certain that the child born of Mary was called the Son of God, and how it happened is never described.
- Holiness. She adds "holy is His name" at once: unlike power in the world, God's power is set apart from every corrupting element.
- Humility. God's stepping in humbled her instead of lifting her up. He came so near that she lost sight of herself.
- Position. She is the object of blessing, not its giver — "blessed," she says, but never a blesser.
- Reach. What God did "for me" flows outward to "those who fear Him," generation after generation.
and his mercy [is] to generations and generations to them that fear him.
Mary sings this song after Elizabeth greets her, and it turns from what God did for one woman to what He does for all who fear Him. Two questions sit inside the line: who counts as one who fears Him, and how far does that mercy run?
Mary does speak about herself in this song. One writer reads her wording closely and points out what she never claims:
Mary had no thought of exaltation. She says, "All generations will call me blessed," but not a blesser. She was the object of blessing, not the giver of it. "For He who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is His name" — not a word of her own. "And His mercy is for those who fear Him from generation to generation" — not to those who pray to or worship me.
Up to this point the song has been naming God Himself — Lord, Saviour, Mighty One, holy. At verse 50 the song changes gear, and mercy is what it names first:
From verse 46 to 49 she speaks of God Himself: "the Lord," "God my Saviour," "He who is mighty," "holy is His name." But from verse 50 to 55 the stress falls on what He has done. Mercy comes first, then strength (verse 51), by which He humbles the pride of the proud... In verse 52 we see His rule, putting down the mighty of this world and exalting the lowly... Verse 54 tells of His help to His suffering servant Israel, remembering mercy after long years of captivity — and this according to His promise to Abraham and his descendants, not according to the covenant of law.
The mercy has a named recipient: those who fear Him. A commentator explains what that fear is, and what its absence proves:
The natural man is said to lack this quality completely. In the believer it stands out as the ruling principle of action. Whether a person has it or not is the real difference between a true believer and someone who is a hypocrite or is fooling himself. An idea of grace held only in the head, without the fear of God, produces lawlessness... The grace of God is never separable from His fear... Those who hate God dread Him and would run from Him, when they think of Him at all: His fear is the treasure of His children.
The verses that follow show mercy in action. God scatters the proud and fills the hungry. Another writer draws out the state of soul that receives such mercy:
The next three verses set out how God acts in grace, and the state of soul needed to receive it. The proud in their own thoughts cannot stand before a holy God in judgment. Neither can the mighty on their thrones, nor the rich and self-sufficient. The gospel is always preached to the poor. God exalts those of low degree, and fills the hungry with good things.
So how far does this mercy run? One writer notes what the word "generation" means in a context like this:
In a genealogy such as Matthew 1, or where the context calls for it as in Luke 1:50, the word "generation" no doubt means a lifetime.
Whose lifetimes? The same writer sees Mary speaking not for herself alone but for a whole people:
For the moment the mighty action of the Holy Spirit merged her as an individual into Israel, and so she rejoices in Israel's God and Saviour... She adds at once, "And His mercy is for those who fear Him from generation to generation," which shows that God's chosen Israel filled her mind.
- Holy — the verse follows straight on from "holy is His name." The God who shows this mercy is named first as mighty and holy.
- Mercy — verse 50 is the hinge where the song stops describing who God is and starts listing what He does. Mercy heads that list, before strength, rule and provision.
- Fear — the mercy has an address: those who fear Him. That fear is reverence that governs behaviour, not terror that runs away. An idea of grace without it produces lawlessness.
- Low — the proud, the mighty and the self-sufficient cannot stand before a holy God. The lowly and the hungry are the ones He exalts and fills.
- Generations — here "generation" means a lifetime. The mercy runs on, lifetime after lifetime, to a whole people whose God remembers His promise.
He has wrought strength with his arm; he has scattered haughty [ones] in the thought of their heart.
Mary's song moves from what God has done for one unknown woman to what His arm does across the whole world order. The line about strength is the hinge. The same power that showed mercy to a lowly woman scatters the proud. And it strikes pride at its source: the heart.
Mary sings about God's power, but she claims none of it. Her greatness lay in staying out of sight.
She acknowledges God her Saviour in the grace that has filled her with such joy. At the same time she admits her utter littleness. God might use a holy instrument — and Mary truly was one — yet she was only great so long as she hid herself. Then God was everything. By making something of herself she would have lost her place; but this she did not. God kept her, so that His grace might be fully shown.
The wording of the song itself guards against the honour later heaped on her. She expects to be called blessed, but never says she blesses.
Mary had no thought of exaltation. She says, "All generations shall call me blessed," but not a blesser. She was the object of blessing, not the giver or mediator of it. "For the Mighty One has done great things for me; and holy is His name" — not a word of her own. "And His mercy is to generations and generations to those who fear Him" — not who pray to or worship me.
Mary's song shifts partway through. Where strength falls in that order matters.
Notice that in verses 46 to 49 she speaks of God Himself — "the Lord," "God my Savior," "He that is mighty," and "Holy is His name." But verses 50 to 55 stress what He has done. She names His mercy first, then His strength (verse 51). By that strength He humbles the pride of the ungodly, showing judgment along with strength. He brings down to dust the imaginations and high things that exalt themselves against the knowledge of God.
Mary's word for the proud is precise. It names an attitude, and it points to where that attitude starts.
Pride. There are several words translated this way in the Greek Testament. The one used here (hyperephania) carries the sense of a spirit of self-exaltation in a man, joined with looking down on others. The Pharisees are glaring examples. They trusted in themselves that they were righteous and despised others (Luke 18:9). But the Gentiles are no more free from guilt in this than the Jews (Rom. 1:30). This arrogance shows itself in boastful words and empty deeds. But its origin is within the heart. That line from Mary's song shows it: "he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts." This form of haughtiness is offensive to God and open to His swift judgment. Both James and Peter write that "God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble" (James 4:6; 1 Peter 5:5).
This verse and the two after it are not random examples. They show who cannot stand before God, and who receives from Him.
These next three verses set out how God acts in grace. They also show what a soul must be like to receive it. The proud in the imagination of their hearts cannot stand before a holy God in judgment. Neither can the mighty on their thrones, nor the rich, the self-sufficient. It is the poor who always hear the gospel preached. And so it is the lowly whom God exalts, and the hungry whom He fills with good things.
Nothing had changed yet. No throne had fallen, no proud man had been scattered. Yet Mary sings in the past tense.
Mary regards the deliverance as already accomplished — accomplished in the One who was about to be born.
Her own case became her evidence for everything else she sings.
Her sense of the extraordinary mercy God showed her in her humble circumstances called out this song. She was descended from David, yet she was only engaged to the humble carpenter of Nazareth. In the mercy shown to her she saw the pledge of the final exaltation of those who fear God, and the scattering of the proud and mighty of this world.
- Arm, not applause. The strength Mary praises is God's own. She stays great only by hiding herself, so His grace is what shows.
- Arm as judgment. The song first names who God is, then what He does: mercy first, then strength. By that strength He humbles the pride of the ungodly.
- Arm reaching the heart. The pride God scatters is self-exaltation mixed with contempt for others. He strikes it at its source in the heart, not just in its boastful words.
- Arm sorting people. The proud, the mighty on thrones, and the self-sufficient rich cannot stand before God. The poor hear the gospel, God exalts the lowly, and He fills the hungry.
- Arm already at work. Mary speaks of the deliverance as done, because it is done in the Child about to be born. The mercy she received is the pledge of the scattering and the exaltation still to come.
He has put down rulers from thrones, and exalted the lowly.
Mary is standing in a village house with her relative Elizabeth, and she sings about emptied thrones. Her song looks past her own situation to a settled pattern in God's dealings. So who are "the mighty"? And has this reversal already happened, or is it still coming?
The word behind "mighty" points to people who hold authority. One reference work traces the same Greek word elsewhere in the New Testament:
dynastēs, "powerful one." Jehovah is the only Sovereign — 1 Timothy 6:15. The word also occurs in Luke 1:52: Jehovah "has brought down 'the mighty' from their thrones." And in Acts 8:27 the eunuch was a man "of great authority": such men at times had more power than the kings.
Mary's praise moves in steps. One commentator maps the flow:
In verses 46 to 49 she speaks of God Himself — "the Lord," "God my Saviour," "He that is mighty," and "Holy is His name." But verses 50 to 55 emphasise what He has done. She mentions His mercy first, then His strength (verse 51), which humbles the pride of the ungodly… Verse 52 shows His rule: He puts down the mighty of this world and exalts the lowly. Verse 53 deals with His administration: He fills the hungry with good things and sends the rich away empty. He reverses the cruel order of the world.
Mary was not announcing something new. God has always handed out His honours the same way:
Such honours were not given to many who were "wise according to worldly standards"; "not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth" (1 Cor. 1:26). There have been some from these exalted ranks, but they have been the first and most ready to own that they had no claim at all to such distinction. There is a grand song in the Old Testament, sung by a Spirit-inspired woman who knew something about the ways and grace of God. She sang, "He raises up the poor from the dust; he lifts the needy from the ash heap to make them sit with princes and inherit a seat of honour" (1 Sam. 2:8). Mary, the mother of our Lord, had learnt the same great truth… This is God's way and it magnifies His grace; it is such as these that He blesses.
Mary was one of the lowly herself, and the verse points at her own place:
Mary had no thought of exaltation. She says, "all generations will call me blessed," but not a blesser. She was the object of blessing, not the giver or mediator of it… "He has brought down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of humble estate" — this alludes to her own place as well as Elizabeth's.
Hiding herself is what kept her in that place:
She acknowledges God her Saviour in the grace that has filled her with such joy, while at the same time she owns her utter littleness… she was only great so long as she hid herself, for then God was everything. By making something of herself she would have lost her place; but this she did not.
What Mary sings runs through the rest of Luke, and it comes with a condition:
The parables found only in Luke set before us for the most part the tender compassions of God, and that grace of His which flows out without measure wherever there is need. But notice that this grace only reaches those whose need is clear. The parables, like the whole Gospel, illustrate the words of Mary: "He has brought down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of humble estate; He has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich He has sent away empty" (1:52-53). These words may be taken as a key to the Gospel.
The verse also looks ahead. In Mary's case it was already true, but the world at large still runs the other way:
The world as we see it today is a barren wilderness. In it the lowly are oppressed, the proud are exalted, and unrighteousness prevails… When the glory of the LORD is revealed, He will deliver His downtrodden people. He will exalt "those of humble estate" — "every valley shall be lifted up." He will humble all the pride of man — He will bring down "the mighty from their thrones" — "every mountain and hill be made low"… The pride and unrighteousness of man are not going to triumph for ever, and the godly will not always be a downtrodden and suffering people. Humility ends in exaltation, and suffering leads to glory.
- Rule. The verse shows God's rule in action: pride humbled, thrones emptied, the lowly lifted. It is the middle step of a song that moves from mercy to strength to rule to administration.
- Reversal. He overturns the cruel order of the world; the only true Sovereign unseats the powerful ones.
- Pattern. This is not new. Hannah sang it first, and Paul restates it: not many powerful, not many of noble birth.
- Place. Mary illustrates her own line. She stayed great only while she hid herself, receiving blessing and never dispensing it.
- Reach. The same grace fills Luke's Gospel. But it reaches only those whose need is out in the open. And the public finish is still ahead: humility ends in exaltation.
He has filled the hungry with good things, and sent away the rich empty.
Mary's song sets two groups side by side, with opposite outcomes. Commentators ask who the "hungry" are, why riches leave a person empty, and whether this reversal belongs to that time, to now, or to the end.
One writer reads this line as a picture of how God runs His world.
Verse 53 deals with His administration. He fills the hungry with good things and sends the rich away empty. He reverses the cruel order of the world. The law is left entirely out of Mary's prophecy, for here the glory of God and the person of Christ is the theme. What she says applied at the time, and it will apply again at the end of the Tribulation.
This is not a one-off event but God's settled way.
In the mercy shown to her she saw a pledge: God will finally exalt those who fear Him and scatter the proud and mighty of this world... She had no thought of Israel having deserved anything under the covenant of law. All depended upon the covenant of promise. The hungry were being filled and the rich dismissed empty. This is ever God's way.
"Rich" here means more than money. It marks the person who feels he needs nothing from God.
The proud in the imagination of their hearts cannot stand before a holy God in judgment. Neither can the mighty on their thrones, nor the rich, the self-sufficient. God always preaches the gospel to the poor. So it is those of low degree whom He exalts, and the hungry whom He fills with good things. The Lord Himself taught the same lesson: "Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you shall be satisfied." Then, turning to the other side, He said, "But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation. Woe to you who are full now, for you shall be hungry." (Luke 6:20-26.)
God's invitation keeps reaching the people the world passes over.
But if the rich man had no desire and so went away empty, He fills the hungry with good things: He preaches the gospel to the poor (Luke 1:53; 4:18). It was the common people who heard Jesus gladly... The search went through the streets and the lanes of the city, and gathered in all the despised of men — "the poor and crippled and blind and lame." This did not exhaust divine grace. The servant said, "Sir, what you commanded has been done, and still there is room."
No one is refused at the door. Those who leave empty brought that emptiness in with them.
Matthew Henry: "None are sent away empty from Christ, but those that come to Him full of themselves."
Nearness to Christ works the other way round: it deepens the sense of need.
It is need that brings us to Him first, and makes us to know Him; and in His presence the sense of need, need met by Him, is ever maintained. "I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing," is what no soul in the presence of Christ can say. Rich He is; and for us those riches are available; but the richer He is in our eyes, the poorer we are in our own.
Luke's own parables run on the same principle.
The parables found only in Luke are very different from those in Matthew. For the most part they set before us the tender compassions of God, and that grace of His which flows out without measure wherever there is need. But notice that this grace only reaches those whose need is plain. In the parables, as in the whole Gospel, we see the words of Mary, most blessed of women, illustrated. We may take those words as a key to the Gospel.
Mary herself is the first illustration of her own line, and she takes the lower place in it.
Mary had no thought of exaltation. She says, "All generations shall call me blessed," but not a blesser. She was the object of blessing, not the giver of it.
One writer applies the verse to the manna — the bread God gave Israel each morning in the desert.
The gathering "every morning" speaks of spiritual diligence. It speaks of an ever-present desire for the spiritual growth that only feeding on the manna can give. But the desire must be there on our part... How sad when the things of this world spoil our taste, so that in our hearts we treat this "bread of the mighty" as "light food."
God keeps the hunger He gives.
God never bids us seek Him in vain... "He satisfies the longing soul" (Ps. 107:9). God will not let us lose our longing.
- Hunger qualifies. Grace "only reaches those whose need is plain" — an admitted emptiness is the one thing God fills.
- Fulness disqualifies. Only those who "come to Him full of themselves" go away empty.
- Reversal rules. God "reverses the cruel order of the world" — He did it then, and He will do it again at the end.
- Promise, not law. What the hungry receive rests on "the covenant of promise," with the law "left entirely out of Mary's prophecy."
- Appetite lasts. We gather manna every morning, yet "God will not let us lose our longing" — the hunger He gives is the hunger He satisfies.
He has helped Israel his servant, in order to remember mercy,
Mary's song ends by turning from what God has done for her to what He has done for a whole nation. The last note she strikes is mercy. Two questions sit inside this short line. In what sense is Israel God's "servant"? And how could Mary speak of help as already given?
The word behind "servant" is pais. It is a common word, and Israel is not the only one it names.
pais, 'a child,' regardless of age, and so used for servant. Matthew 8:6, 8, 13; Matthew 14:2; Luke 7:7; Luke 12:45; Luke 15:26; Acts 4:25. The word is applied to Christ in Matthew 12:18; Acts 3:13, 26 (translated 'Son'); Acts 4:27, 30 (translated 'child'); and to Israel and to David in Luke 1:54, 69.
The help Mary celebrates rests on nothing Israel had earned. Their record ruled that out.
God has remembered His promises to the fathers, which seemed forgotten for so long. They are mercies only, for Israel's complete failure could allow no claim at all. That made them witness all the more to what was in Him, so they could not fail. The help that came to Israel was only the wrapping around a wider purpose of blessing, which the promise to Abraham declared without any conditions.
Which covenant Mary reaches back to matters. She does not name Sinai, the mountain where God gave the law. One writer sees the whole future of the nation resting on that choice.
Notice carefully how mercy is laid as the ground of Israel here. We know the Psalms, so this will be familiar to us. Paul leaves them on this: "In order that they also may be objects of mercy." All this is the true and full ground of Israel's restoration in the latter day, and casts great light on it. It rests on Abraham alone — not on Sinai, not even on Jacob or Israel. It is a present fulfilment of the promise and covenant made to Abraham by mercy, and that mercy comes from on high.
The lines before this one describe God scattering the proud, unseating rulers, and filling the hungry. Verse 54 is where that sequence lands.
Verse 54 tells of His help to His suffering servant Israel. He remembers mercy after long years of Israel's captivity. This is according to His promise to Abraham and his seed — not according to the covenant of law. Mary's prophecy leaves the law out completely, for here the glory of God and the person of Christ is the theme. What she speaks had direct application at the time and will also have application at the end of the Tribulation.
Mary speaks of the rescue in the past tense, though nothing had yet changed in Israel. Her confidence rests on a person.
Mary regards the deliverance as already done — done in the One who was about to be born. So she says that "God has helped His servant Israel, in remembrance of His mercy; as He spoke to our fathers, to Abraham, and to his seed for ever."
The distance between the promise and its fulfilment did not shake that confidence.
Faith gives substance to the things we hope for. The stretches Israel would have to cross before these words came true were dreary. Yet at this moment Mary looked over the accomplishment of all God's purposes of grace for His earthly people.
Mary's praise keeps to one people and one line of promise. An older song in Israel's history ran along the same lines.
The character of the thoughts that fill the heart of Mary is Jewish. It reminds us of Hannah's song in 1 Samuel 2, which speaks prophetically of this same blessed intervention of God. But Mary goes back to the promises made to the fathers, and takes in the whole of Israel.
The earthly blessings Mary sang of did not come at once. The reason lies in how the nation received Christ.
Verses 69-74 recall both the promises to the fathers and the promise to David's house: "He has raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of His servant David… to perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember His holy covenant, the oath which He swore to our father Abraham." It is almost needless to say that the earthly blessings were deferred, because the nation rejected Christ.
- Servant. The word covers both child and servant. Luke applies it here to Israel and to David — a nation owned by God, not one that had proved itself.
- Mercy. Israel's failure left no claim, so the help comes as mercy only; the song traces it to Abraham, never to Sinai.
- Remembrance. God remembers what He promised long ago. The promise to Abraham carried no conditions, so it could not fail.
- Reach. The help to one nation wrapped a wider purpose inside it. The promise to Abraham's seed reached far past Mary's day.
- Result. Mary spoke of the deliverance as already done, secured in the Child about to be born. The nation rejected Him, so the earthly side of it waits still.
(as he spoke to our fathers,) to Abraham and to his seed for ever.
Mary's song ends where Israel's hope began — with a promise God made to Abraham generations earlier. So the question the verse turns on is simple: did God act because Israel deserved it, or because He had given His word?
The verse gives the reason God moved: He was remembering something He had said. One writer stresses that a remembered promise leaves Israel with no claim of its own.
God has remembered His promises to the fathers, which had seemed forgotten for so long. They are mercies only, for Israel's complete failure could allow no claim at all. All the more did they point to what was in Him, and so they could not fail. The help that came to Israel in fact held within it a purpose of wider blessing, which the promise to Abraham declared without conditions. For in fact the Christ of Israel is the Son of man. The Seed of the woman crushes the serpent's head. Life, righteousness and sanctification are in Him. Crucified in weakness, He is the wisdom of God and the power of God, by grace through faith, alike for all.
Mary traces the coming birth to a promise, not to a bargain. That distinction shapes the whole song.
She also saw that the coming of her Child would fulfil the promise God made to Abraham — God's unconditional promise. She had no thought of Israel having deserved anything under the covenant of law. All depended upon the covenant of promise. God was filling the hungry and sending the rich away empty. This is always God's way.
Luke's sentence is packed tight, and readers can wonder which phrase "to Abraham" belongs with. One commentator weighs the wording.
"To Abraham" certainly seems to hang upon "to remember mercy," and the "for ever" appears to confirm this. Still, the whole sentence holds together as one idea, for His mercy was much in the promise.
Nothing had changed for Israel when Mary sang. Yet she speaks of the promise as already kept, and one writer shows why that is faith.
Mary closes her song with the words already mentioned: "He has helped His servant Israel, in remembrance of His mercy, as He spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his offspring forever." Faith gives substance to what is hoped for. At this moment Mary surveyed the accomplishment of all God's purposes of grace for His earthly people, however bleak the road Israel still had to travel before these words came true. Indeed, everything was both secured and established in the person of Him who was about to be born into this world.
The same writer sets her beside Hannah, whose song looked ahead to a deliverance still to come:
Mary, on the other hand, regards the deliverance as already accomplished — accomplished in the One who was about to be born.
Mary's hope keeps to one line, and her song echoes an older one.
The character of the thoughts that fill Mary's heart is Jewish. It reminds us of Hannah's song in 1 Samuel 2, which speaks prophetically of this same blessed intervention of God. But Mary goes back to the promises made to the fathers, and takes in the whole of Israel.
If the promise reaches "for ever," what happened when the nation refused Christ? One writer sets this verse beside words sung later in the same chapter.
Again, when Christ came: "as he spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his offspring forever" (Luke 1:54-55). Verses 69-74 recall both the promises to the fathers and the promises to David's house: "He has raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David … to show the mercy promised to our fathers and to remember his holy covenant, the oath that he swore to our father Abraham." It hardly needs saying that the earthly blessings were put off, because the nation rejected Christ.
A postponed promise is still a sure one. One writer says where that certainty rests:
What she sang then came from the Holy Spirit, whose power had filled her virgin womb with the Lord's incarnate Christ. Those joyful hopes will come true at the appointed time. For the blessings her song has in view are all secured in Him who was raised from the dead.
- Cause — a word given. God helped Israel because He had spoken to Abraham, not because the nation had earned it.
- Ground — mercy only. Israel's failure left no claim; what God remembered was His own promise, so it could not fail.
- Terms — unconditional. The blessing rests on the covenant of promise, not on the covenant of law, and it comes by grace through faith, alike for all.
- Reach — "for ever." The promise runs to Abraham's offspring with no end date. The earthly blessings were put off when the nation rejected Christ, not cancelled.
- Certainty — a Person. Everything Mary sang is secured in the Child then about to be born and now raised from the dead. That is why faith can sing in the past tense.
And Mary abode with her about three months, and returned to her house.
Luke's account of the visit closes almost as quietly as it began: a length of time, and a journey home. Three months pass in one line, and commentators ask what filled them, and why Scripture says nothing about them.
The three months bring Mary right up to the birth of John. One writer traces the order of events and marks where the record of their talk stops:
With the last notes of her song, the record of all that passed between those two ends for us. Yet for about three months those holy women enjoyed each other's company. Then Mary retraced her steps northward to Nazareth, and Elizabeth's full time drew near for the birth of her son.
The visit was not just a family call. Mary knew that God was at work in Elizabeth too, and that shared work drew the two women together:
Wherever there is a work of grace in souls, they are drawn together in the bonds of divine love. So it was with Mary and Elizabeth. Gabriel had revealed to Mary that God had also visited her cousin Elizabeth. She had a sense of what God would accomplish through her, whether or not she understood the full meaning of what she had been told. And she was made to feel that there was one friend to whom she could pour out her soul.
Luke records nothing at all of those weeks. One commentator reads that silence as deliberate, and says what we can still be sure of:
For three months Mary stayed with her elderly relative, and then returned to her own house. Scripture draws a veil over the conversations of these holy women. But we may be sure they helped one another's faith and joy in the Lord. The visit ended, and Mary went back to her home... Meanwhile, that home was the one spot on earth that drew and held the attention of heaven.
Mary does not stay where the wonder is. She goes home to her own quiet path, and that is how God's ways move forward:
After three months with Elizabeth, she returns to her house. She humbly follows her own path, so that God's ways may be accomplished.
Two women hid themselves in the hill country, with no audience at all. The same writer sets what the world could see beside what God was doing there:
They hide themselves. Nothing enters the scene they move in but piety and grace. But God is there, as little known to the world as these poor women were. He is preparing and accomplishing what the angels long to explore in its depths... They hid themselves. But God had visited their hearts and touched them with His grace, and they answered these wonderful visits from above with their shared piety. The grace of God was truly reflected in the calm of a heart that knew His hand and His greatness, trusting His goodness and bowing to His will. We are favoured: we are let into a scene the world shut itself out of by its unbelief and its distance from God, and in which God was at work.
Mary was not alone in this. She belonged to a small circle of people God had kept for Himself, marked out by nothing the world would notice:
Notice the character of the remnant God had reserved for Himself. Zacharias and Elizabeth were obedient, keeping all the Lord's commandments blamelessly. Simeon was just and devout. He was in step with God's thoughts, waiting for the consolation of Israel... There was Anna at her prayers, serving God with fasting and prayer night and day. There were Joseph and Mary, simple and devout, governed by the mind of heaven. There was nothing of human greatness in any of these. There was nothing to draw the world's attention. But how highly favoured of God they were!
- Drawn — God's work in two hearts pulls them together. Mary travelled because she had one friend she could pour out her soul to.
- Hidden — Scripture draws a veil over three months of talk. We are told only that it happened.
- Helped — the stay was not wasted. The two helped one another's faith and joy in the Lord.
- Home — Mary goes back to her own humble path. God works out His purposes by that ordinary road.
- Watched — the world saw nothing here. Yet heaven's attention rested on this one spot, and the angels longed to look into it.