Leviticus 7:28–34

Leviticus 7:28 · Darby

And Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying,

Leviticus 7:28 opens a fresh word from the LORD. The subject is not how the peace offering is killed, but how it is shared: what the worshipper carries, what the fire takes, and what the priests receive. That raises the question these verses answer — how close may an ordinary Israelite come, and what may he enjoy?

The Law of the Offering

This offering is not about trespass or forgiveness. These verses give its "law" — who brings what, and how near a man may come.

It is not brought because of any trespass. No forgiveness is connected with it, and it is not said to make atonement… In Leviticus 7:11-21 and 28-36 we have "the law" of this offering. Verse 30 appoints that the offerer is to bring the portions that are to be burnt to the altar with his own hands. This is special to the peace offering. He is not to put these on the altar — the priest must do that — but bring them to it. It is the nearest approach for the Israelite (not a priest) to God.

Modernised from ForeshadowsOriginal wording

His Own Hands

Verse 30 puts the weight on the offerer's own hands.

This passage is a picture of presenting the excellencies of Christ to God the Father. You cannot do that second-hand. It calls for personal exercise of heart, pictured by the stress laid on the offerer's own hands.

Modernised from Scripture QuarterlyOriginal wording

What one person brings, others eat. So the offering asks what we give to the people around us, not just what we take in.

"His own hands shall bring the offerings of the Lord made by fire" (v.30)… It is not only what we gain from others, but what do they gain from us? This peace offering would raise the question with every one of us: What are we adding to the little company where we belong, that spiritually enriches them? It is not a question of giving lectures or standing up and preaching the gospel. It is the bringing of anything that bears the character of Christ Himself.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Four Portions, Four Joys

One animal is divided, and God names who receives each part.

When we come to the law of the peace offering, there is a portion for Jehovah, for the priest who offers it, for the priests in general, and for the company. There is God's joy, Christ's own joy; the priests generally, as such, rejoice, and so does the company of the faithful.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Breast and the Shoulder

Two parts of the animal are singled out in the verses that follow, and each one pictures something in Christ.

We now come to the final revelation about the peace offering, and its subject is the right sharing out of the different parts of the sacrifice among everyone concerned. Chapter 3 has already described how Jehovah's part was prepared and offered. Here we learn that the breast was waved and the right shoulder heaved. Both acts mean the same thing: an open acknowledgement that the portion waved or heaved was for God. The breast speaks of the affections, the right shoulder of a person's strength, which in Christ were both given wholly to God. The breast was for Aaron and his sons. God gave it to them, and what it pictures God has given us — the love of Christ to share in. The right shoulder was for the priest who offered, the picture of the Lord Himself. For who knew as He did the strength needed to do God's will!

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Eating as Fellowship

Sharing a sacrificial meal was never neutral. It showed who the eater was in fellowship with.

They sprinkled the blood on the altar and then ate the sacrifice. So those who knowingly shared in it were counted as partakers of the altar. This was the way of showing communion, whether with an idol or between a believer and God… Christ is presented here as the perfect burnt offering, wholly given up to God in death for His glory. But He is also an offering on which we feed. He is not only God's delight; He is that of which we can partake with Him. He is the subject-matter of communion.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Keeping the Joy Real

Joy in the Lord is easy to lose hold of. It can drift away from the sacrifice that gave rise to it.

If Christians in gladness of heart come to seek the Lord in communion, the Spirit is present… But if they are not very watchful, their joy degenerates. It outlasts what is spiritual and becomes joy in the flesh. The real test and power of this is its connection with the sacrifice offered.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. A new word from the LORD opens the sharing out of the peace offering. Verses 28-36 are its "law" — the rules of who receives what.

- Hands. The worshipper carries his own portion to the altar. No one can do it for him, and it is the nearest a non-priest could come to God.

- Gift. God gives the breast, which pictures the affections, to Aaron and his sons. The shoulder pictures strength, and it goes to the priest who offered.

- Reach. One sacrifice feeds God, the offering priest, the priests, and the whole company. Four portions, four joys.

- Result. Eating makes the eater a partaker of the altar. The joy stays real only while it stays tied to the sacrifice.

Leviticus 7:29 · Darby

Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, He that presenteth the sacrifice of his peace-offering to Jehovah shall bring his offering to Jehovah of the sacrifice of his peace-offering.

The Lord speaks again here, and His word opens the last section of the law of the peace offering. Everything that follows — the fat, the breast, the shoulder, the shared meal — turns on one thing: the person who brings the offering must carry it to the altar himself.

Why this law is placed last

The peace offering comes third in the opening chapters, but its law comes last. One writer sees a reason for that:

No other offering opens up the worshipper's communion as fully as the peace offering does. In the burnt offering, Christ offers Himself to God. In the grain offering, we have Christ's perfect humanity. Then, moving on to the sin offering, we learn that sin at its root is fully met. In the trespass offering, there is a full answer to the actual sin in the life. But none of them opens up the teaching of the worshipper's communion. That belongs to the peace offering, and this, I believe, is why the law of that offering stands where it does. It comes last of all. It teaches us that when it is a question of the soul feeding on Christ, it must be a full Christ.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer gives a practical reason:

The law of the peace offering runs from verse 11 to verse 34. The order of the offerings is changed, and here it comes last. The reason, we suppose, is this. In the other cases only the priests shared in the offering. Here the ordinary person who brought it was allowed a share as well.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the offerer himself carried

One writer marks out what this offering is not, and what it asks of the one who brings it:

It is not brought because of any trespass. No forgiveness is connected with it, and it is not said to make atonement… In Leviticus 7:11-21 and 28-36 we have "the law" of this offering. Verse 30 lays down that the offerer must bring the portions that are to be burned to the altar with his own hands. This is special to the peace offering. He is not to put them on the altar — the priest must do that — but he brings them to it. This is the nearest an Israelite who is not a priest can come to God.

Modernised from H. C. PresslandOriginal wording

No second-hand worship

One writer draws out what those hands picture for us:

In picture, this passage speaks of presenting the excellencies of Christ to God the Father. No one can do that second-hand. It calls for real exercise of heart, pictured by the stress laid on the offerer's own hands.

Modernised from Scripture QuarterlyOriginal wording

Bringing something that is of the Lord

One writer starts with the source of what we bring:

First of all we must be sure that it is "of the Lord". It is no good bringing something that comes from ourselves, something we have imagined or something we like. There is no room for such offerings in the divine circle. But however small it is, even if it is only one small feature of Christ, there is room for it in that circle. We must be sure that what we bring is entirely "of the Lord". It must be divine in origin.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The same writer adds that no one is left out:

We are all able to bring something. One thing about this peace offering is that its width brings everyone in. Who cannot give thanks to God? Who cannot freely offer something for the pleasure of God?… Whatever we bring as a peace offering becomes food for the souls of the saints; it is an offering to God. Whatever we bring, the idea is spiritual food that enriches the company we belong to.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The portions God claims

One writer traces who receives each part:

A fresh word from the Lord in verses 28-36 claims the breast that is waved and the shoulder that is lifted up out of the peace offering. The breast was for the whole priestly family, Aaron and his sons; the shoulder was for the priest who offered. Each was their fixed portion for ever from the children of Israel. So the Lord had His part, and the Israelite was free to enjoy his own — himself, his family, and any Israelite he invited to share, as long as they were clean. Only in this last word from Him, and in solemn, emphatic language, do we find that He reserved a special portion, not to weaken the fellowship but to deepen it. Aaron and his sons, as we have seen, stand for Christ and His own. For us, communion falls short if it does not take in the Head and the body, all the saints.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Last, on purpose. This law closes the list because no other offering opens up the worshipper's communion so fully — and because here the ordinary offerer gets a share too.

- Of the Lord. What we bring must be divine in origin. Something we imagined or simply liked has no place; the smallest feature of Christ does.

- By his own hands. The offerer carries the portions to the altar himself. This is special to the peace offering, and no one can do it for him.

- Unto the Lord. God reserved a portion for Himself and for the priests — not to weaken the fellowship but to deepen it.

- For the company. What we bring to God as His food becomes food for His people, and it enriches the circle we belong to.

Leviticus 7:30 · Darby

His own hands shall bring Jehovah's offerings by fire, the fat with the breast shall he bring the breast, that it may be waved as a wave-offering before Jehovah.

Leviticus 7:30 ends the rules for the peace offering by saying who carries what to the altar. The worshipper brings the fat and the breast himself, which raises two questions: why his own hands, and what do the two portions stand for?

Brought by the offerer's own hands

The stress falls on one detail: the offerer's own hands do the carrying.

This passage speaks in picture form of presenting the excellencies of Christ to God the Father. That is something which cannot be done second-hand. It calls for personal exercise of heart, pictured by the stress laid on the offerer's own hands.

Modernised from Scripture QuarterlyOriginal wording

There is a limit to how far he goes:

"The law" of this offering says that the offerer must bring the portions that are to be burnt to the altar with his own hands. This is special to the peace offering. He is not to put these on the altar — the priest must do that — but bring them to it. It is the nearest approach for the Israelite (who is not a priest) to God. The breast was given to Aaron and his sons; the rest belonged to the offerer, for himself and his household.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

The fat goes up first

The verse names the fat before the breast. Commentators read that order as deliberate.

The fat speaks of the excellency of the offerings, and it always goes to God; the fat comes first. Before we can help other believers, we must be going on with our own souls before God. We must present the thing to God Himself — the excellencies of that offering — if the people of God are going to get the benefit of a food offering in that circle.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Commentators differ on what the fat pictures. One answers two rival readings head-on:

The offering is called "the food" or "bread" of the fire offering to the Lord. How wonderful that He and we enjoy the same offering! How far from the truth of Christ it is, then, to find in this burning of the fat "the offering up of our good affections to God in all our prayers and praises." Far worse still is to call it "the putting to death of our corrupt affections and lusts, and the burning up of them by the fire of divine grace." … No; it was neither our good offered up, nor our bad put to death, but the inward energy of Christ Himself, as the perfect and lasting ground of communion for God and His family.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the waving meant

The wave offering was a motion, not a burning, and the motion had a recognised shape and sense.

The rabbis explain that the heave shoulder was moved up and down, and the wave breast waved from side to side. The actions were done "before the Lord." They seem to picture those who moved the offerings as really in His presence, with their hands filled with Christ.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Waving and heaving are not interchangeable terms:

The idea in a heave-offering was the taking up of a part to offer it to God. The idea of the wave-offering is wider: it implies consecration to God, for it was waved before the Lord.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The breast becomes food for the priests

The breast is waved before God, then handed back as the portion of Aaron and his sons. It stands for the love of Christ.

The priest waved the breast before it was eaten by "Aaron and his sons." The waving would speak of our grasp and enjoyment of the love of Christ. It matches the delight that God has in it. None of the priestly sons are shut out from enjoying "the love of Christ"; it was the portion of all to feed on the breast.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Bringing something, at cost

The offerer carries what others will feed on. Commentators apply this to what each believer brings to God's people.

We should all bring something to that company that is of help to them; it is not only what we gain from others, but what do they gain from us? … There may be testing about it — the offerings of the Lord are "made by fire," tested by holy discernment in the power of the Spirit of God. It is called a sacrifice, and that means it may cost us a little to keep the thing going. It costs time and opportunity we could have used on ourselves, but which we are quite prepared to give to the company for the blessing of all.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Own hands. The offerer carries his own offering. This is the nearest a non-priest comes to God, and no one can do it for him.

- Fat first. God's portion goes up before anyone feeds. It stands for the inward energy of Christ — not our good offered up, and not our bad burned away.

- Waved, not burned. The breast is moved before the Lord. That gesture means consecration, made by people in His presence with hands full of Christ.

- Given back. What is waved before God returns as food for Aaron and his sons. No member of the priestly family is shut out of it.

- Costing something. The verse asks what each person brings to enrich others. Such an offering is tested by fire, and it costs time and self.

Leviticus 7:31 · Darby

And the priest shall burn the fat on the altar; and the breast shall be Aaron's and his sons'.

This verse belongs to the rules for the peace offering. That sacrifice fed everyone connected with it: part burned for God, part given to the priests, the rest eaten by the worshipper. So why does God keep the fat, and why does He hand the breast to Aaron and his sons?

The Fat Belongs to God

The fat was burned, not eaten. Writers link it to what only God could measure in Christ.

The fat stood for the inner excellence and energy of the sacrifice offered to Jehovah. So it was not for the priests to use. It was a fragrance of rest to Him who alone could fully value it in the One that sacrifice pictured.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God Is Served First

The burning comes first in the verse; the breast comes after. One writer draws a lesson from that order.

Notice here that the LORD (Jehovah) had His part first. That part was the inward worth and excellencies of the victim. He alone knew, or could measure, the real worth and inward energy and affection of our Lord Jesus Christ. This is an important point. We may be sure that those who walk in fellowship with the Father seek His glory and His things first. Those who make a rule of attending to the things of God after they have done their own things know little of communion, even if they do know peace.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

Waved Before It Was Eaten

The breast did not go straight to the priests. It was first waved — a gesture the writers describe from the rabbis and read as a picture of standing in God's presence.

The rabbis explain that the heave shoulder was moved up and down, and the wave breast waved from side to side. They did these actions "before the Lord." This seems to picture those who moved the offerings as truly in His presence, with their hands full of Christ.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Commentators also pair the breast with the right shoulder of the heave offering. The order of the two carries its own lesson.

The wave breast speaks of the movement of affection. The heave shoulder speaks of the movement of strength. But the wave breast always came before the heave shoulder. That is, love lies under the vertical heave offering. The ability behind the movement of strength is love.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

The Breast Speaks of Love

Why the breast? Commentators take it as the place of affection — the love of Christ, given to His people as their portion forever.

Aaron and his sons typify all believers. The breast was their portion. What does the breast speak to us of? The place of affection. The love of the Lord Jesus to us is beyond words, and it is our portion forever. We must always remember that the blessed Lord Jesus loves all His people. As individuals we say, He "loved me and gave Himself for me." As one people we say, He "loved the church and gave Himself up for her."

Modernised from Robert F. KingscoteOriginal wording

Commentators differ on who Aaron and his sons picture. Kingscote takes them together as all believers. Another writer separates them, and reads the waving as pointing to Christ in heaven.

Aaron is typical of Christ, and his sons speak of God's saints as worshipers. When the offering came to the Lord, the breast was waved as a wave offering to the Lord and then given to Aaron and his sons. The sacrifice of course speaks of Christ sacrificed on Calvary. But the wave breast reminds us of His exaltation in heaven. The breast shows the warmth of His love flowing out now, and that is wonderful food for true worshipers.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

One Animal, Four Portions

The verse divides the animal, but it does not divide the people. Every party fed on the same sacrifice.

So God, the offering priest, Aaron and his sons, and the person who brought the animal all fed on the same thing — the same animal. It becomes, then, a very simple picture of communion with God, with the Lord Jesus Christ — the offering Priest — and with one another as believers.

Modernised from Robert F. KingscoteOriginal wording

Food That Shapes the Eater

The priests ate the breast, and food changes the one who eats.

The breast was the common portion of Aaron and his sons. Eating it shaped the one who ate. So today the love of Christ is the common portion of all the saints, together with Christ. When a believer takes that love in, it forms and nourishes him. We shall love in the way that Christ loved.

Modernised from Scripture QuarterlyOriginal wording

Summary

- God's portion. The fat goes to the altar first — the inward excellence of Christ, given back to the only One who can fully value it.

- God's order. He takes His part before His people take theirs. Reverse that order and you may know peace, but you will know little of communion.

- God's gift. What He takes, He also gives. The breast, waved in His presence, becomes the portion of Aaron's family.

- God's reach. The breast is the seat of affection — the love of Christ, held in common by all His people, not rationed to a few.

- God's result. Eaten, that love forms the eater; those fed on Christ's affection begin to love as He loved.

Leviticus 7:32 · Darby

And the right shoulder of the sacrifices of your peace-offerings shall ye give as a heave-offering unto the priest.

The law of the peace offering ends by sharing one animal among everyone involved. So why does the right shoulder — the ESV's "right thigh" — go to the priest who served at the altar, and why must the worshipper be the one to hand it over?

One animal, several portions

Each party connected with the sacrifice received a portion of the same animal.

Put these verses together, and it becomes very clear. First, the fat was God's, and it was burned on the altar as a sweet savour. Second, the breast belonged to Aaron and his sons. Third, the right shoulder belonged to the offering priest — a picture of the Lord Jesus. As I said before, the one who brought the animal ate the rest of it with his friends. So God, the offering priest, Aaron and his sons, and the person who brought the animal in sacrifice all fed upon the same thing — the same animal. It becomes, therefore, a very simple picture of communion with God, and with the Lord Jesus Christ — the offering Priest — and with one another as believers.

Modernised from Robert F KingscoteOriginal wording

What "heave offering" means

The ESV's word "contribution" is what other versions call a "heave offering." Heaving and waving were two different motions, and both took place in God's presence.

The rabbis explain that the heave shoulder was moved up and down, while the wave breast was waved from side to side. Both actions were done 'before the Lord.' They seem to show that those who moved the offerings stood in His presence, with their hands full of Christ.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The two words can overlap, but one of them carries more weight.

The heave offering was more absolute than the wave offering, though the same offering could sometimes be called by either name, depending on the aspect in view. The heave offering was not the whole of what was offered, but a part offered to Jehovah. The whole breast was waved, and the right shoulder was heaved. The breast stood for the affections as a whole, and the shoulder for the strength that could best carry the burden. Christ and His own, near to God, enjoy the love together; and He, as the Priest who offered, has His special joy in what stood for the support of the weak.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the shoulder, and why the right one

One writer asks why God claimed only one shoulder, but claimed the whole breast.

God claimed in this way a portion of what the shoulders symbolize, while all that the breast pictured was declared to belong to Him. The shoulder seems to stand for capability for service; and the right shoulder means that what was best able to bear the burden should be given up to Him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer ties that strength to the cross.

The right shoulder stood for strength, and it went to the one who pictured the Lord Jesus. Who but the One who gave up His life on the cross could know what strength that took?

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Claimed by God, given to the priest

The worshipper hands the portion over, but it is never his to keep back or to grant as a favour.

It was the priest's due; but God would not leave him to claim it. The person who brought the sacrifice was to give him the right shoulder. To Aaron and his sons, the males of the holy priesthood, he was to give the breast. The Lord claimed these portions, the right shoulder to be heaved, and the breast to be waved; and then, as His, gave them to the priests. This rule for the officiating priest was never to be abolished.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Food for strength

Commentators differ on who the offering priest stands for. Others apply the shoulder to the believer who brings Christ before God. For them, eating the portion is where strength for daily life comes from.

The right shoulder was the portion of the priest who offered the blood and the fat of the peace offering. As we present Christ to God in communion, we can feed on Him. In His walk down here He was always for the will and pleasure of God, and in this way we would gain the strength to walk "even as He walked."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Claimed. God takes the right shoulder first; the worshipper gives it, but the portion is God's before it is the priest's.

- Heaved. Waving moved the breast from side to side. Heaving lifted the shoulder up and down, and it is the more absolute act of the two.

- Strength. The breast stands for the affections, and God takes all of it. The shoulder stands for the power to carry a load, and God claims one of the two.

- Given back. What God claims, He hands to the priest as food. The strength pictured in the shoulder becomes something a person lives on.

- Shared. God, the offering priest, Aaron's sons and the worshipper all eat from one animal. That shared meal is a picture of communion.

Leviticus 7:33 · Darby

He of the sons of Aaron that presenteth the blood of the peace-offerings, and the fat, shall have the right shoulder for [his] part.

Leviticus 7 divides the peace offering among everyone connected with it, and this verse names one man's share: the priest who handled the blood and the fat. Why does he receive what the other priests do not, and what does the right thigh — called the "right shoulder" in older translations — stand for?

Everyone Has a Named Share

The peace offering was never eaten by one party alone. Each share went to a different person, and each person stands for someone in the picture.

If we turn to the law of the offerings, we find that the rest was eaten. The breast was for Aaron and his sons, a picture of the whole church. The right shoulder was for the priest who sprinkled the blood, and he is more especially a picture of Christ as the offering priest. The rest of the animal was eaten by the man who presented it, and by those he invited.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Portion Was Given, Not Claimed

The verse names a due, yet the worshipper is the one told to hand it over — and that due never ran out.

When the peace offering had been dealt with correctly at the altar, the priest who offered it received his appointed portion. The person who brought the offering had to give it to him. It was the priest's due; but God would not leave him to claim it: the person who brought the sacrifice was to give him the right shoulder... This rule about the officiating priest was never to be cancelled. In the wilderness the portion was his, and in the land too (Deut. 18:3); once they were in the land, the two cheeks and the stomach are named as his portion as well. The right shoulder pictures strength, and it went to the man who pictured the Lord Jesus. For who but the One who gave up His life on the cross could really know what strength that took?

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Blood And Fat: What Qualifies Him

The verse ties the portion to a specific act — offering the blood and the fat. Those two items never belonged to any priest; they were God's. The priest's own share is something else, and it is his for ever.

The whole breast was waved and the right shoulder was heaved. The breast stands for the affections as a whole, and the shoulder for the strength that could best carry the burden. Christ and His own enjoy the love together in nearness to God. He, as the Priest who offered, has His own special joy in what stood for the support of the weak. But the fat, or inward energy, like the blood, was Jehovah's portion. So while all shared communion in Christ, each one had what was specially due to him, on unchanging grounds and for ever.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer names the reason this priest must have a share.

The offering priest is a picture of the Lord Jesus, who offered Himself without spot to God. He must surely have His part in all this blessed communion and joy and worship, because it has all come about through Him.

Modernised from Robert F. KingscoteOriginal wording

One Animal, Four Tables

Every portion came off one animal, and four parties ate from it.

So God, the offering priest, Aaron and his sons, and the person who brought the animal as a sacrifice all fed on the same thing – the same animal. It becomes, then, a very simple picture of communion with God, with the Lord Jesus Christ – the offering Priest – and with one another as believers.

Modernised from Robert F. KingscoteOriginal wording

Where Commentators Differ

The writers above read the right shoulder as Christ's portion, the offering priest. Another carries the application further, to strength passed on to the one who eats.

But the right shoulder became the portion of the priest that offered the blood of the peace offering (Lev. 7:33). So that the offerer was reinforced in his strength for walk by eating. There is thus a singular reflex action between our assimilation of Christ and our strength for right conduct in the responsible sphere of our lives.

Modernised from Scripture QuarterlyOriginal wording

A similar line appears elsewhere, tying the shoulder to those who bring Christ before God:

But the right shoulder was the portion of the priest who offered the blood and the fat of the peace offering. As we present Christ to God in communion, we can feed on Him who, in His walk down here, always lived for the will and pleasure of God. In this way we would gain the strength to walk "even as He walked" (1 John 2:6).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- One victim. God, the offering priest, Aaron's household and the worshipper all ate from the same animal. That one source is what makes the offering a picture of communion.

- One act qualifies. The portion goes to the priest who handled the blood and the fat; the fat and blood themselves stayed God's and were never any priest's food.

- One symbol. The right shoulder stands for strength — the strength it took to give up life on the cross. Only the One who did it knew that fully.

- One gift. God told the worshipper to hand the portion over. The priest never had to claim what was already his due.

- One permanence. Each party received what was specially theirs, on unchanging grounds and for ever. This priest's due was never cancelled, in the wilderness or in the land. Commentators differ on whether the worshipper also feeds on that strength for daily walk.

Leviticus 7:34 · Darby

For the breast of the wave-offering, and the shoulder of the heave-offering, have I taken of the children of Israel from the sacrifices of their peace-offerings, and have given them unto Aaron the priest and unto his sons from the children of Israel by an everlasting statute.

This verse closes the law of the peace offering with a transfer: God takes two parts of every peace offering and hands them to Aaron and his sons. Why these two parts, why give them away instead of just keeping them, and what does a share fixed "as a perpetual due" tell us about God?

God Claims, Then Gives

The breast and the shoulder — the ESV calls it the thigh — never pass straight from the worshipper to the priest. They go up to God first and come back as His gift. So the priest never has to demand his share.

It was the priest's due, but God would not leave him to claim it… The Lord claimed these portions — the right shoulder to be heaved, the breast to be waved. Then, as His own, He gave them to the priests.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What the Breast and Shoulder Stand For

The two parts chosen are not random cuts of meat. Each pictures something in Christ that the worshipper needs.

What are we to learn from this rich and generous gift of "the wave breast and heave shoulder" as the priests' food? Only this: that all the unsearchable, perfect love of Christ, and His almighty power too, are laid open to us for the everlasting comfort and strength of our souls. The breast is the seat of the affections, the shoulder the source of power; both are set before us here. And as we feed, the need of our souls is met in the most precious way. It spreads out before us both the affections and the strength of Him who made peace for us by the blood of His cross.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

Why the Breast Comes First

Each part moved a different way, and the order never changed.

The wave offering was waved from side to side. After that, the right shoulder of the heave offering was lifted up and down. One is the movement of affection, the other the movement of strength. But the wave breast always came before the heave shoulder. Love lies under the upward heave offering: the ability behind the movement of strength is love.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Who Receives Which Part

The verse names Aaron and his sons together. Yet the two parts go to different people, and each carries its own picture.

The breast speaks of the affections, the right shoulder of a person's strength, which in Christ were both consecrated to God. The breast was for Aaron and his sons. God gave it to them; and what it pictures God has given us — the love of Christ to share in. The right shoulder was for the priest who offered, the type of the Lord Himself. For who knew as He did the strength needed to do God's will! The rest of the animal the offerer could feast on at home with all his friends who were clean, a picture of Israel's communion with God in the sacrifice of Christ in a day to come. So Christ Himself, Christians, and Israel all have fellowship with God in the death and life of Christ.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The Waved Breast and the Living Christ

The animal died, yet the breast was lifted and waved before God. That action points beyond the death.

The sacrifice of course speaks of Christ sacrificed on Calvary, but the wave breast reminds us of His exaltation in heaven, the breast indicating the warmth of His love flowing out now, which is wonderful food for true worshipers to feed upon.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A Portion Settled For Ever

The words "a perpetual due" make this more than a temporary arrangement. No one can lose his share.

The whole breast was waved and the right shoulder heaved — the symbols of the affections as a whole, and of the strength best able to carry the burden. Christ and His own, near to God, enjoy the love together. As the Priest who offered, He has His special joy in the part that stood for the support of the weak. So while all had their communion in Christ, each one had what was due to him in particular, on unchangeable ground and for ever.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

When the Provision Was Despised

God provided generously for the priests. Some of them still grabbed more than their share.

How great was their sin! They profaned the sacrifices of the people, and to that they added shameless gluttony, though God had made ample provision to support them. But no, this was not enough. They had to have more. If the poor, bullied people of God did not give it willingly, they would take it by force… They stopped at nothing to satisfy their appetites, and robbed both God and His people in their shameless greed.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Taken — God claims the breast and shoulder first. What reaches the priest comes as God's gift, not as a debt he must chase.

- Given — the two parts picture the love and the power of Christ, spread out as food for His people's comfort and strength.

- Ordered — the breast is waved before the shoulder is heaved. Love lies underneath the strength.

- Shared — the breast goes to Aaron and his sons, the shoulder to the priest who offered, the rest to the worshipper. Christ, Christians and Israel all have fellowship in the one sacrifice.

- Secured — the share is held "as a perpetual due," on unchangeable ground. Only greed can spoil a provision so settled.