Leviticus 26:27–39

Leviticus 26:27 · Darby

And if for this ye hearken not to me, but walk contrary unto me,

This verse comes near the end of a long warning God gave Israel. Blow after blow had already fallen, and each one had failed to bring them back. So the words "if you will not listen" open one more step. What does God do when correction has not changed a heart?

Slow to anger

The judgments in this chapter come in stages. One writer shows what each blow was aiming at:

How ready the Lord was to bless His people! How full was the blessing He could give them! He would have delighted to walk among them. But they would not have it. So judgment had to come. Yet how slow to anger! He would only deal blow after blow when each earlier one had failed to bring them to repentance. At last exile had to be their lot.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Walking contrary

To "walk contrary" is to go the opposite way to God. One writer traces Israel's misery to that:

He said it to Israel again and again: they walked contrary to Him, and that was why they were miserable. God knows that walking with Him is what secures the happiness and holiness of His people. A way of their own will always end in misery. And even now, after all He has revealed of Himself in Jesus — even now He says to faith, "Walk before me."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Discipline from God's own hand

Verse 28 gives the answer, and it is personal. God names Himself as the one who strikes:

The furnace of wrath grows hotter against guilty Israel, and the Lord says, "I Myself will discipline you sevenfold for your sins." They would eat the flesh of their own sons and daughters. The high places and sun-pillars they had honoured would be cut down. Their own dead bodies would be heaped on those of their idols, and His soul would abhor them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strictest with those nearest

Belonging to God is no shelter from His hand. The same writer sets two other passages beside this one:

He is gracious beyond measure. But we know Him who said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord," and again, "The Lord will judge his people." "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God" (Heb. 10:30-31). He punished the vile practices of the doomed nations who had pushed into His land. He chastens His own people even more strictly. "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities" (Amos 3:2).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "seven times" means

Readers have long asked what that number means. One writer denies that it measures a length of time and points ahead to a future crisis for Israel:

Some have guessed at the meaning of the words about judgments coming on them seven times. These "seven times" cannot mean the exact length of Israel's scattering. They point ahead instead to the time of Jacob's trouble. That is the last seven years of the times of the Gentiles, when their judgments will be at their worst.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Government, not grace

This chapter shows God governing His people. One writer warns us not to mix that up with grace:

We are very prone to confuse two things that Scripture keeps clearly apart: God's government and God's grace. This confusion does harm in many ways. It is sure to weaken our sense of the dignity and solemnity of government, and of the purity, fullness, and elevation of grace. It is quite true that in government God keeps the sovereign right to act in patience, long-suffering, and mercy. But we must never confuse that with the unconditional working of pure and absolute grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The way back

The chain of "ifs" turns at verse 40. A door opens, on two terms:

With verse 40 a ray of light begins to shine. A door of hope opens, if two things happen. First, they must confess their iniquities. Second, they must accept the punishment their iniquities have brought on them. This second condition comes up twice, you notice, and it clearly matters a great deal. Both things appear in Daniel's prayer (Dan. 9), so he got a speedy answer. A man may confess his sin. But if he still kicks against the punishment it brings, his confession is only surface-deep and lacks real, deep sorrow. This is as true for us today as it was for Israel long ago. God's governmental dealings with His children are always in love, but they are also in strict righteousness.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- If — the whole chapter hangs on repeated conditions. God moves to the next stroke only when the last one has failed to bring repentance.

- Contrary — going the opposite way to God is what makes a people miserable. His call, then and now, is to walk before Him.

- Fury — the discipline now turns personal and sevenfold. God names Himself as the one who strikes.

- Nearness — belonging to God brings stricter dealing, not lighter. He judges those He has known.

- Return — the door opens on two things: confessing the sin and accepting the punishment. A confession that resents the rod is only surface-deep.

Leviticus 26:28 · Darby

then I will walk contrary unto you also in fury; and I, even I, will chastise you seven-fold for your sins.

Leviticus 26 sets two futures before Israel side by side. Verse 28 sits deep inside the darker one. There God meets their opposition with His own. Why does He speak of fury against the people He loves, and what is He after?

Where the verse stands

Both halves of the chapter turn on one thing: what Israel would do. Verse 28 falls in the second half.

Leviticus 26, which we have now reached, has a very solemn character. Verses 1-13 give a glowing picture of the earthly blessing and prosperity that obedience would bring. Verses 14-39 give a terrible forecast of the evils that disobedience would bring.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Discipline delivered in stages

God's warning does not fall as one blow. It is counted out in stages.

These steps, as detailed here, are five in number. How they tell of the longings of the LORD's heart over His rebellious people, chastising them only as much as was needed to lead them to repentance.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Verse 28 almost repeats verse 24. That repetition is part of the message.

Verses 27 and 28 practically repeat verses 23 and 24. How wearying it must have been for God to find Israel rebellious again and again, despite His many disciplinary dealings! But His chastisement would then bring something dreadful: they would eat the flesh of their own sons and daughters (v. 29). Compare 2 Kings 6:26-29.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

"I myself"

God names Himself as the one who acts. He does not hand this to anyone else. And Israel's nearness to Him does not soften the blow. It is the reason for it.

He is gracious beyond measure. But we know Him who said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord," and again, "The Lord will judge his people." It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God (Heb. 10:30-31). He punished the vile practices of the doomed nations who had intruded into His land. How much more strictly does He chasten His own people. "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities" (Amos 3:2).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Words that came true

These were not empty threats. The stage named in verse 28 came, and it came in the order given.

If the Lord's dealings still would not reform them, and they kept walking contrary to Him, then He would walk contrary to them. He would punish them seven times for their sins... Should that fail too, the Lord would walk contrary to them in fury. The people, brought to the last extremity, would eat their own children... That happened at last in the days of Zedekiah. Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem brought the predicted miseries, as Lamentations 1 and 2 describe.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

A lesson wider than Israel

God gave the warning long before the events. History then carried it out in public. Israel's story became a lesson for every other nation.

But, sad to say, Israel failed altogether. They had a solemn and appalling picture set before their eyes in verses 14-33 of this chapter. Even so, they forsook the Lord and served other gods, and so brought on themselves the severe judgements threatened in this section... They read aloud, to all the nations of the earth, a most impressive lesson on the moral government of God. These nations would gain much by studying that lesson. And our own hearts would do well to ponder it too.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where the severity is heading

The punishment is not where the chapter ends. The lowest point is the turning point.

When they are brought this low, into misery and shame, the goodness of God leads them to repentance. What a lesson to all the nations! Yet the nations never learn it, until Israel shows the way. Israel is forgiven by grace, at the very time when they cannot forgive themselves before the LORD and His anointed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Contrary, foretold. The chapter first promises blessing for obedience. Verse 28 belongs to the warning that runs from verse 14 to verse 39.

- Contrary, measured. The threatened dealings come in five steps. God chastises only as far as He must to bring His people to repentance.

- Contrary, repeated. Verses 27-28 restate verses 23-24. Israel stayed rebellious through all God's disciplinary dealings.

- Contrary, and personal. God says He Himself will act. Being the people He has known does not shield them — "you only have I known… therefore I will punish you."

- Contrary, until they turn. At the lowest point, God's goodness leads them to repentance. The nations learn the lesson only when Israel shows the way.

Leviticus 26:29 · Darby

And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat.

Leviticus 26 sets out a rising scale of discipline for a people who keep turning away from God. Verse 29 sits near the bottom of that scale, where starving parents feed on their own children. The horror raises three questions. Why would God say such a thing? Did it ever happen? Is there anything past it?

A Step on a Ladder

The verse is not a random threat. It comes late in a chain of judgments — sword, hunger, disease — and each stage arrives only after the one before it fails to bring repentance.

If the Lord's dealings still did not correct them, and they went on walking contrary to Him, then He would walk contrary to them. He would punish them seven times for their sins. He would bring a sword to avenge the covenant, along with the two things that so often come with it: hunger and disease. Should that too fail, the Lord would walk contrary to them in fury. The people, pushed to the very last extreme, would eat their own children. And Jehovah would destroy the idols, showing them up to be idols.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The Refused Alternative

God repeats His warning here because Israel keeps repeating its rebellion. Another road stayed open the whole way down, and Israel refused it.

Verses 27 and 28 repeat almost exactly what verses 23 and 24 said. How tiring it must have been for God to find Israel rebelling again and again, in the face of all His discipline! But His discipline would then bring the awful experience of eating the flesh of their own sons and daughters (v. 29)! Compare 2 Kings 6:26-29. Instead of turning to God in repentant faith and praying to Him, they would take the horrible alternative: murdering their children to satisfy their bodily hunger!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Words That Came True

Centuries later, an enemy army shut Samaria in and the food ran out. What the city then did was no accident of war. God had said it in advance, and He allowed the siege that brought it about.

Now, in the government of God, God lets the enemy besiege Samaria, and "a great famine" follows in the city. Desperate need grips the people inside, and the solemn prophecy spoken more than five hundred years earlier comes true. Moses had warned the people of God about this. If they turned away from Him, the time would come when their enemies would besiege them. Need would press them so hard that tender, delicate women would eat their young children in secret (Lev. 26:21-29; Deut. 28:49-57). This abomination had at last come to pass.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Samaria was not the only time. Writers trace the same scene at other sieges of Jerusalem, generations apart.

The same horror occurred during the siege of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar (Lam. 4:10) and also, according to Josephus, during the siege by Titus in A.D. 70.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Government, Not the Whole of God

Verse 29 shows God ruling and judging His own people. Commentators warn that readers easily mix up two things the Bible keeps apart.

We very easily confuse two things that the Bible keeps apart: God's government and God's grace. The evils that come from this confusion are various. It is sure to weaken our sense of how dignified and serious God's government is. It also weakens our sense of how pure, full, and high His grace is. It is quite true that God in government reserves to Himself the sovereign right to act in patience, long-suffering, and mercy. But when He shows those attributes from His throne of government, we must never confuse them with the unconditional actings of pure and absolute grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not the Last Word

Verse 29 is terrible, but the chapter does not stop there. Once the discipline has done its work, everything turns on a promise God made long before Israel failed.

Then they will confess and humble themselves before God. On that, He will remember His covenant with their fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and He will remember the land. They will never be completely destroyed, for their God is that Jehovah who brought them out of Egypt to be their God.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — Moses named this horror centuries before it happened, so no one could call it an accident.

- Graduated — each stage of discipline came only after the one before it failed to bring repentance. This one sits near the end of the ladder.

- Refused — prayer and repentance stayed open at every stage. Israel reached this depth by choosing anything but turning back.

- Fulfilled — the words came true at Samaria under siege, and again at Jerusalem under Nebuchadnezzar and later Titus.

- Outlasted — God's government is not His grace. When the discipline has run its course, He remembers a covenant older than Israel's failure, and He will not destroy them completely.

Leviticus 26:30 · Darby

And I will lay waste your high places, and cut down your sun-pillars, and cast your carcases upon the carcases of your idols; and my soul shall abhor you.

Leviticus 26 sets two futures before Israel: blessing if they obey, judgment in stages if they refuse. Verse 30 sits in the last and heaviest stage, where God turns on the idols His people chose over Him.

Judgment delivered in stages

The threats of this chapter come in stages, not in one blow. The stages show what God was after.

These steps, as set out here, are five in number. How they tell of the longing of Jehovah's heart over His rebellious people! He disciplines them only as much as is needed to lead them to repentance. (1) He threatens sickness, along with slaughter by their enemies, and the crops of the soil, the fruit of their labours, left at the mercy of the invader (verses 16-17). If that had brought them to repentance, God's dealing in government would have stopped. But when that failed, drought and the famine that follows would come (18-20).

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What a "high place" was

A high place was a shrine of a particular kind. Israel found such shrines already standing in Canaan.

The usual word for the high place is bamah. It means what is high or raised up, and then the hills where people built altars. Such places stood in Canaan before the Israelites entered it, and they had orders to destroy them. If the Israelites had such places, God would destroy them and cut down their images.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Dead bodies on dead idols

The picture in the second half of the verse is exact. Worshippers fall on the very spot where they had looked for help. Their bodies lie on the broken figures they trusted.

God would destroy those places. In those very places some would die, and their bodies would lie on the lifeless forms of their broken idols (v. 30). It is as much as to say, "Where is the help they expected the idol to give to its deluded victim?"

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

"My soul will abhor you"

This is the fifth and last step. God once treated the nation as the apple of His eye; now His soul turns from them in loathing.

Should that too fail, the Lord would walk contrary to them in fury. Then (5) the people, driven to the last extremity, would eat their own children. And the idols — shown to be nothing but idols — Jehovah would destroy. The people He had once regarded as the apple of His eye He would abhor. He would lay their cities waste and bring their sanctuaries to desolation.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Words that came true

The warning did not stay on the page. It landed when Babylon carried the nation away.

In Leviticus 26 God threatens the people if they fail in their conduct… "But if you will not listen to me" (v. 14) — He warns them of the heaviest judgments, and at last He will cast them out of their land (v. 31-39). This is exactly what happened to them when Babylon carried them away captive (compare 2 Chronicles 36:21 with Leviticus 26:34). The land enjoyed her Sabbaths while Jerusalem lay desolate. Once every seven years there was to be a year of rest, but the people had no faith in God to keep it. Because they would not believe God and let the land rest, God found this way to enforce obedience to His law.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where the chapter ends

The loathing in verse 30 is real, but it is not God's last word. The chapter ends with mercy.

Israel made and worshipped idols. Israel rebelled, despising their nearness to Jehovah. Israel braved His discipline. Israel brought waste on their cities and desolation on their land. But away in exile they will confess their sin and accept its punishment from Jehovah. He will remember His covenant with their fathers, and remember their land. Mercy will glory over judgment. Jehovah's end is this: He is full of tender compassion and pity.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Patience — the judgments fall in five steps. God's aim in each one is repentance. Had any step worked, His hand would have stopped there.

- Provocation — Israel had orders to tear down the high places on entering the land. They kept them, so God tore them down Himself.

- Exposure — bodies fall on broken idols and ask what the idol cannot answer: where was the help they expected from it?

- Reversal — the people once treated as the apple of His eye hear that His soul will abhor them. Their cities and sanctuaries fall with their shrines.

- Mercy — the same chapter that threatened exile ends with confession. God remembers His covenant, and mercy glories over judgment.

Leviticus 26:31 · Darby

And I will lay waste your cities and desolate your sanctuaries; and I will not smell your sweet odours.

Leviticus 26 sets two futures before Israel: blessing if they listen, and heavier and heavier correction if they refuse. This verse sits near the end of that second list, and it raises two hard questions — why would God ruin His own house, and is there any way back?

Place in the chapter

God does not send every blow at once. Each one aims to turn the people back to Him, and the next comes only after the last has failed.

How ready the Lord was to bless His people! How full was the blessing He could have given them, since He would have delighted to walk among them. But they refused. So judgment had to come. Yet how slow He is to anger! He sent the next blow only when the one before it had failed to bring them to repentance. At last exile had to be their lot.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Judgment nearest to God's own people

Being close to God raises the standard instead of lowering it.

You might have thought it hard to find blows heavier than those the Lord had already brought on His people in the first half of our chapter. But Israel grew stubborn and kept on in their sin, so here we see Him deal even more terribly with their hard rebellion. He is gracious beyond measure... If He punished the vile practices of the doomed nations who had pushed into His land, He disciplines His own people even more strictly. "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities" (Amos 3:2).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Idolatry as the cause

One writer links this threat to a scroll read aloud to a king of Judah centuries later.

We learn from Huldah the prophetess's answer to Josiah the king (2 Kings 22:16-17) that this part of God's word was in the book which Shaphan the scribe read aloud to the king. We are told that the destruction of Jerusalem, especially because of idolatry, was predicted in that book, and that it would certainly be carried out. Deuteronomy 28 predicted the sorrows that would follow the people's sins. But Leviticus 26:31-32 plainly foretells what Deuteronomy 28:52 only hints at — the destruction of their cities and their sanctuaries, especially because they practised idolatry.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A sanctuary left in ruins

As long as God's house stands, He still takes their side. Its fall is the sign that He no longer does.

God calls His house at Jerusalem the place of His sanctuary... This is not simply God permitting the people to be trodden down as discipline for their sins. For that to happen, the temple itself is let fall, as it was at the time of the captivity in Babylon. It has to be so, for God to show that He has completely handed His people over to the fruit of their ways. While He owns His honour there, He must stand up and defend them, even while He disciplines them. But once the temple is destroyed and their city laid flat, He does leave them to the full-grown fruit of their sins — though He may still intend to bring them back.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Worship that God refuses

The last clause is about the offerings themselves. One writer, on the same threat in Amos, names what made them hateful to God.

Their pretence of honouring Him with sacrifice and feast day, with song or harp, was hateful to Him, because it all went together with self-will, turning away from His word, and setting up idols.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fulfilled in history

These words later came true at a fixed point in history.

The people He once treasured as the apple of His eye He would come to detest... That took place at last in the days of Zedekiah. The sorrows foretold here came true during the siege of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, which Lamentations 1 and 2 describe.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Government, not the end of grace

This chapter shows God governing His people. One writer warns against mixing that up with grace.

We very easily confuse two things that the word keeps clearly apart: God's government and God's grace... It is quite true that in His government God keeps the sovereign right to act in patience, long-suffering and mercy. But when He shows these qualities from His throne of government, we must never mistake them for the unconditional working of pure and absolute grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Even the lowest point has an aim beyond itself:

Once they are brought down to the lowest misery and disgrace, the goodness of God leads them to repentance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — idolatry is why the cities and sanctuaries fall. Leviticus says plainly what Deuteronomy only hints at.

- Patience — the blows come one at a time. Each waits to see whether the one before it brought repentance. Exile is the last step, not the first.

- Privilege — being the people God knew meant stricter, not softer, dealing.

- Refusal — when self-will and idols stand behind the incense, the ritual itself becomes hateful to God. A fallen temple shows He no longer shields them.

- Purpose — the ruin was real history under Nebuchadnezzar. Even so, God's goodness uses it to lead them to repentance. His government is never the same thing as His grace.

Leviticus 26:32 · Darby

And I will bring the land into desolation; that your enemies who dwell there in may be astonished at it.

God does not stop at scattering the people. He strikes the ground itself, and the nations who move in and take over can only stare at what they find. Why aim the judgment at soil and stone, and does the ruin of a land mean God has finished with it?

Cities, Sanctuaries and Soil

The threat is very specific. One writer compares it with the warnings in Deuteronomy, and points back to the day the book of the law was read aloud to King Josiah.

From Huldah the prophetess and her answer to King Josiah we learn that this part of God's word was in the book which Shaphan the scribe read aloud to the king. The destruction of Jerusalem, especially because of idolatry, was foretold in that book, and it would certainly happen. Now Deuteronomy 28 predicted the sorrows of the people because of their sins. But Leviticus 26:31-32 plainly foretells what Deuteronomy 28:52 only hints at: the destruction of their cities and their sanctuaries, and that especially because of their idol worship.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Prediction Turned Into History

This chapter has not stayed on the page. One writer sets it beside the record of the nation from the days of Moses until now.

This chapter is a summary of all the later prophecy of Holy Scripture concerning Israel. It is just as truly a summary of Israel's history. This is so strictly true that we can describe the history of that nation, from the days of Moses until now, in a single way. It is simply this chapter translated from the language of prediction into the language of history.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the Enemies Are Astonished

The astonishment is not just at ruins. Those who took possession found that the land would not work for them.

This is all that the enemy could do. He could not make it yield its fruit to him. We already see this in the long sabbaths of rest the land has had while Israel has been banished from it. It would not yield its strength to any of the nations, and the people now in possession are simply plunderers, and nothing else. But for the time being this suits the Lord's purpose. They are, as it were, His watchmen against anyone else coming in who might mean to make the land his own. Waves of invaders still sweep over it, and it stays under a government that makes anything like prosperity impossible. All this is only the sign that the land is still waiting for her true inhabitants.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Barrenness as Safekeeping

The same desolation that punished Israel also guarded her inheritance. One writer points to the low rainfall as God's own means to that end.

Please make a special note of this. God's government, visiting the land with barrenness and dryness, was the way He chose to preserve the land for the people. The rightful inhabitants were scattered among the nations. So the way to keep the land for them was to make it undesirable to its conquerors and to the nations around it. The scantiness of the rainfall accomplished this in a very remarkable way. Indeed, one cannot imagine any other way of reaching this end. It is truly the finger of God.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The Sabbath the Land Was Owed

Israel had not let the land have the rest God commanded. The desolation collects that unpaid debt.

He would go on to devastate their cities and sanctuaries, to the astonishment of their enemies living there. Their land would not escape either. They had despised His sabbaths in days, in years and in jubilee years, so there would be a judicial sabbath: the land would be desolate while Israel was in the enemies' land. The land that flows with milk and honey would lie desolate and have rest. This was in place of the rest it did not have when the tribes lived there.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Covenant and the Land

The chapter does not end in ruin. Its closing verses reach back to God's covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob — and the land is named there too.

God does not close this searching word of His without remembering His covenant — as it is said, His covenant with Jacob, and His covenant with Isaac, and His covenant with Abraham. He speaks here in this strikingly emphatic way of His covenant with every one of them. So even from the mouth of the One they had sinned against so long and so deeply, there would be a threefold witness for His mercy in that day. "And I will," says He, "remember the land."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. God foretold the ruin of cities, sanctuaries and soil, and named idolatry as its cause.

- Fulfilled. Israel's history since Moses reads like this chapter turned from prediction into record.

- Resisted. The enemies who settled there could not make the land yield its strength to them.

- Preserved. The same barrenness that punished Israel kept the land unwanted by anyone else.

- Remembered. The chapter closes with a threefold witness to God's mercy — and with God remembering the land itself.

Leviticus 26:33 · Darby

And I will scatter you among the nations, and will draw out the sword after you; and your land shall be desolation, and your cities waste.

Leviticus 26 lays two futures before Israel: blessing if they walk with God, and judgment that grows heavier stage by stage if they refuse. This verse is where that second road ends, and it raises the hardest question of the chapter: if God empties His own land, is the promise finished?

A land held on terms

Israel's grip on Canaan was never absolute. One writer sets out the terms they entered on.

But the Israelites have never had an unconditional possession of the land of Canaan. They entered on these terms: "If you walk in My statutes and observe My commandments and do them, then I will give you your rains in their season," and other promised blessings... So the Israelites never had more than a conditional hold on the land. And a conditional gift is clearly no fulfilment of an unconditional promise.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

The sword that follows

Scattering is not the end of the sentence. God draws the sword and sends it after them, and a later prophet uses the very same words.

Another phrase found only in Ezekiel and the books of Moses is, "I will draw out a sword after them." Compare Ex. 15:9 and Lev. 26:33 with Ezek. 5:2, 12 and Ezek. 12:14. Notice that in both Lev. 26:33 and Ezek. 12:14 the threat of drawing the sword comes with the threat of dispersion, expressed in the original in the very same words.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Rest the land was owed

The desolation is not just ruin; it is repayment. Israel owed the land a rest every seventh year, and the numbers add up.

There is no record of the Sabbatical year and the year of Jubilee ever being kept. Lev. 26:34-35 predicts what would happen if the Israelites did not let the land keep the sabbaths. It reads almost like a prophecy: the land should lie desolate "because it did not rest on your Sabbaths." In Jer. 25:11-12; Jer. 29:10; Dan. 9:2 the desolation lasts seventy years. The land was to rest one year in every seven, so the 70 years answer to 70 × 7 = 490 years... In this, as in everything else, it seems they failed to obey. But God will make the Jubilee good to them in grace when they own their Messiah.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Fulfilled to the letter

The warning became history, and the ruin stayed visible for centuries.

Cities would be laid waste and their place of worship destroyed, the land becoming so desolate that even their enemies would be astonished. The people of Israel would be scattered among the nations. They would not lose their identity, but they would be persecuted without mercy wherever they went. All these things have taken place. For centuries the land lay desolate, though in 1948 the Jews regained part of it with a government of their own.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A lesson addressed to everyone

The scattered nation is not only a warning to itself. Others are meant to read it.

Under the heavy weight of these judgements they are suffering at this very hour. Scattered and stripped, wasted and outcast, they are the monuments of Jehovah's unbending truth and justice. They read aloud to all the nations of the earth a most striking lesson about the moral government of God. Those nations would profit by studying that lesson closely, and our own hearts would do well to ponder it too.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The door left open

The chapter does not stop at scattering. A few verses later hope returns, on two conditions.

With verse 40 a ray of light begins to shine. A door of hope is opened, if two things come to pass. First, there must be the confession of their iniquities. Second, the acceptance of the punishment that their iniquities have brought upon them... A man may confess his sin. But if he still fights against the punishment it brings, his confession is only surface-deep, and lacks the depth of real sorrow for sin.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

And when they repent, God remembers a covenant older than Sinai.

In chapter 26 God sets them in the land on the condition of their obedience, and warns them of the consequences. But notice what God remembers when they repent. It is not the covenant of Sinai, nor the covenant of Moses, but His own unchangeable covenant with Abraham. That covenant drew Him back — not to their righteousness, but to His own faithfulness for the sake of their fathers.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Terms — Israel held the land on condition of obedience. A conditional gift is not the unconditional promise made to Abraham.

- Sword — In the original wording, scattering and a drawn sword come together. Exile was not escape but pursuit, and Ezekiel repeats the threat in the same words.

- Sabbaths — The empty land took back the rests Israel withheld. Seventy years of desolation answered 490 years of disobedience.

- Witness — Scattered but never absorbed, the nation still shows every people how God governs.

- Covenant — The door opens again when confession accepts the punishment. God then goes back past Sinai to His own faithfulness to the fathers.

Leviticus 26:34 · Darby

Then shall the land enjoy its sabbaths all the days of the desolation, when ye are in your enemies' land; then shall the land rest, and enjoy its sabbaths.

Leviticus 26 sets two futures before Israel: blessing if they listen, and growing judgments if they will not. Verse 34 names one of the strangest. The land itself receives the rest its people refused to give it, while they are far away in enemy country.

The Rest Israel Never Gave

Every seventh year the ground was to lie unworked. What stopped Israel from keeping it was not ignorance. It was sight.

I now turn to one more instance of the power of the visible and its effect on Israel — the way it turned them aside from keeping the Sabbatical year. Here it is all the more striking and solemn, because Jehovah had made special provision to meet the case (see Lev. 25:20-21). The desire of His heart was that the land should keep a sabbath to the Lord. Nothing could be more clear, or more beautiful in what it pictures. Did Israel hold to the mind of Jehovah in this? Jehovah promised to command His blessing on them in the sixth year, so that it would bring forth fruit for three years. As far as they were concerned, that promise was in vain. The visible work of man's hands, their sowing and reaping, was greater and better to them than His blessing.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

How much rest was owed? The length of the exile answers.

There is no record that Israel ever kept the Sabbatical year or the year of Jubilee. Lev. 26:34-35 predicts what would happen if the Israelites did not let the land keep the sabbaths. It reads almost like a prophecy: the land should lie desolate because it did not rest during your sabbaths. In Jer. 25:11-12; Jer. 29:10; Dan. 9:2 the actual desolation is said to be seventy years. And as the land was to have rested one year in every seven, it follows that the 70 answers to 70 × 7 = 490 years.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Whose Land It Was

The verse gives the sabbaths to the land, not to Israel. So whose land was it?

The sabbath year was the same truth written large, so that everyone could read and see it. It brought the land into prominence: "a year of rest for the land," of which Jehovah was landlord, and Israel His tenants — holding it only as long as He allowed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The rest was a sign of who owned the ground. And it took in more than the farmer.

The land was to enjoy its sabbaths, as a lasting sign that it belonged to the Lord. So it, as well as man, must share God's rest. Here, however, the poor and the beasts of the field are prominent. God had care for both. Whatever the distance between them, both alike are His creatures. This reminded the children of Israel that they were only tenants.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Sabbath Kept by Judgment

Israel's refusal did not cancel God's rest. He took it another way. What they would not give, He collected.

Their land too would not escape. They had despised His sabbaths — in days, in years, in jubilees. So there would be a judicial sabbath: the land would lie desolate while Israel was in the enemies' land. The land that flows with milk and honey would lie desolate and rest. It would take the rest it never had while the tribes lived there.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Commentators point to the exile in Babylon as the moment this came true.

Leviticus 26 holds threats for the people if they should fail in their conduct. "But if you will not listen to me" (v. 14) — He threatens them with the heaviest judgments, and at last with driving them out of their land (v. 31-39). This is exactly what happened when they were carried captive to Babylon (compare 2 Chron. 36:21 with Lev. 26:34), and the land enjoyed its sabbaths while Jerusalem lay desolate. Once every seven years there was to be a year of rest. But the people had no faith in God to keep it. Because they did not believe God, He found this means of enforcing obedience to His law.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What Follows the Desolation

The chapter does not end in the emptied land.

A promise follows this threat: "If they confess their iniquity… then I will remember my covenant with Jacob" (v. 40-42). That is, they would be brought back.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the law never got from them, mercy will one day give: "the Jubilee will be made good to them in grace when they acknowledge their Messiah" (Morrish Bible Dictionary).

Summary

- Owner. The land was Jehovah's; Israel held it as tenants, and its seventh-year rest was the standing sign of whose it was.

- Refusal. Ruled by what they could see, they prized their own sowing and reaping above God's promise of a sixth-year harvest. No record shows them ever keeping the sabbath year.

- Collection. God did not drop His claim. He took as a "judicial sabbath" what they would not give: the land rested while its people were gone.

- Arithmetic. Seventy years of desolation answer to 490 years of unkept sabbaths — the debt counted to the last year.

- Return. The threat is not the last word. Confession brings God back to His covenant. Grace will yet make good the Jubilee Israel never kept.

Leviticus 26:35 · Darby

All the days of the desolation it shall rest, [the days in] which it did not rest on your sabbaths, when ye dwelt therein.

God tells Israel what their empty land will do while they live in a foreign country. It will catch up on the rest they refused to give it. The verse turns a national disaster into strict accounting: every seventh year of rest they withheld, the land now takes back in desolation.

A Sabbath Enforced by Judgment

The rest here is not a gift but a sentence. One writer names what kind of sabbath it is:

Their land would not escape either. They had despised His sabbaths — in days and years and jubilee years — so there would be a judicial sabbath: the land would lie desolate while Israel was in the enemies' land. The land flowing with milk and honey would lie desolate and have rest, in place of the rest it did not get when the tribes lived there.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Whose Land It Was

Leaving the fields alone every seventh year was Israel's admission of who owned the ground. Breaking the command cost them the ground itself:

The land was the Lord's, as all land is, but here the Lord asserts His claim to it. By giving up his right of ownership every seventh year, the Israelite admitted who he held it from. For that year he was not the owner: the harvest belonged to anyone as much as to him, and it was appointed as a Sabbath to Jehovah. That year Jehovah fed everyone freely with what grew up under His hand without human farming. Israel's whole hold on the land depended on this recognition of the divine lordship. Because they broke this command, the land was to enjoy the Sabbaths that had been taken from it, lying empty while the people were driven out.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The same writer carries the claim forward to Jesus' story about tenant farmers:

In His parable of the tenant farmers, the Lord directly links their rejection of Himself with their rejection of Jehovah's rights over the vineyard He had rented out to them. Here the idea carried by the Sabbatical year is extended and developed (Matt. 21:33-41). The prophets had been His servants, sent to collect His fruit: "Finally He sent His Son to them, saying, 'They will respect My Son.' But when the tenants saw the Son, they said to themselves, 'This is the heir. Come, let us kill Him and have His inheritance.'" So comes the righteous sentence on them.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the Rest Was Never Given

Why would a whole nation ignore one command? One writer traces it to plain greed:

So God's word through Jeremiah came true: the land of Israel would be left desolate, to enjoy the sabbaths it had not enjoyed for years. The people were greedy. They wanted crops in the seventh year as well as in the six years God had given them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer traces it to unbelief:

Once every seven years there was to be a year of rest. But the people did not have faith in God to keep it. Because they did not believe God and would not allow the sabbath years, God found this way of enforcing obedience to His law.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Arithmetic of Seventy Years

The verse ties the length of the desolation to the number of sabbaths owed. One writer counts them:

There is no record of the Sabbatical year and the year of Jubilee ever being kept. Leviticus 26:34-35 predicts what would happen if the Israelites did not let the land keep its sabbaths. It reads almost like a prophecy. In Jer. 25:11-12; Jer. 29:10; Dan. 9:2 the actual desolation is said to be seventy years. And as the land was to have rested one year in every seven, it follows that the 70 years answer to 70 × 7 = 490 years. Now the kingdom began in 1095 B.C., and Jerusalem was taken in 606 B.C., which is just 490 years. It seems that in this, as in everything else, they failed to obey. But the Jubilee will be made good to them in grace when they acknowledge their Messiah.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Rest Longer Than Anyone Expected

Another writer notes how long that rest ran:

Verses 34 and 35 expect that they would ignore the commands about the sabbath, especially about the land. So God would give the land a long sabbatical rest, when they were driven out and it lay desolate. We all know how long a rest that land has had until quite recent years.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God Remembers the Land

The chapter does not end with an empty field:

God does not close this searching word of His without remembering His covenant — as it says, with Jacob, and His covenant with Isaac, and His covenant with Abraham. He speaks here with unusual emphasis of His covenant with each one of them. So even from His own mouth, the One they had sinned against so long and so deeply, there would be a threefold witness for His mercy in that day. "And I will," says He, "remember the land."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Owner. Every seventh year Israel admitted that the land was the Lord's and they were only tenants.

- Robbery. Greed and unbelief made them work the land every year, taking rest that belonged to God.

- Repayment. The desolation is a judicial sabbath. The land collects while they are gone what they refused to give while they were there.

- Reckoning. Seventy years of rest answer to 490 years of missed sabbaths. God's accounts balance.

- Remembrance. The chapter that empties the land ends with God remembering His covenant — and remembering the land. He will yet make good the Jubilee in grace.

Leviticus 26:36 · Darby

And as to those that remain of you -- I will send faintness into their hearts in the lands of their enemies, that the sound of a driven leaf shall chase them, and they shall flee, as fleeing from a sword; and they shall fall when none pursueth;

Leviticus 26 has climbed through warning after warning, and this verse shows the end of the road: survivors abroad, running from a blowing leaf. It raises two questions: who sent that fear, and whether this is the end of their story.

The two halves of Leviticus 26

The verse belongs to the darker half of a chapter built on a single contrast.

Leviticus 26, which we have now reached, has a very solemn character. Verses 1-13 give a glowing picture of the earthly blessing and prosperity that would follow their obedience. Verses 14-39 give a terrible forecast of the evils that would follow, if disobedience marked them... But it was all strictly conditional. It runs, "If you walk … then I will give." Everything depended on their obedience, and that "If" proved fatal.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Terror with no enemy in it

What makes this picture unusual is that nothing is chasing them. The panic is real; the pursuer is not.

Fear of their enemies would be so great that the sound of a shaken leaf would make them run. They would expect injury or death when no one was pursuing them (v. 36). They would be no help to one another in their selfish anxiety to deliver themselves alone. In the lands in which they had sought shelter they would in effect be "eaten up" (v. 38).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Courage given, courage withdrawn

The faintness God sends replaces something they once had.

Instead of the courage He once gave them against all odds, they would fall into abject terror... Those left of them in their enemies' lands would pine away in their own iniquities, and in the iniquities of their fathers with them (38, 39).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So what had Israel's protection ever rested on?

The presence of God should always have been their shield and defence. No weapon formed against them could prosper. But only an obedient people could enjoy that presence. Jehovah could not sanction disobedience or wickedness by His presence. The uncircumcised nations around them might depend on their skill and their military resources. Israel had only the arm of Jehovah to depend on. He would never stretch out that arm to shield unholiness or disobedience. Their strength was to walk with God in a spirit of dependence and obedience. As long as they walked that way, a wall of fire surrounded them, protecting them from every enemy and every evil.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The conscience behind the panic

Scripture elsewhere states the principle behind a fear that runs from nothing.

To fear an enemy much mightier than yourself is not blameworthy. But to fear without cause — when you are unbeatable — is cowardice indeed, and Scripture marks such a spirit as shameful. It is solemn to learn that Scripture places the "cowardly" with the "unbelieving" among those condemned to the lake of fire (Revelation 21:8). An evil conscience makes a coward. "The wicked flee when no one pursues, but the righteous are bold as a lion" (Proverbs 28:1).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

From warning to history

The threat did not stay a threat.

But Israel failed altogether. Despite the solemn and appalling picture set before their eyes in verses 14-33 of this chapter, they forsook the Lord and served other gods. So they brought on themselves the severe judgments threatened in this section... Scattered and stripped, wasted and outcast, they are the monuments of Jehovah's unbending truth and justice. They read aloud, to all the nations of the earth, a most impressive lesson about the moral government of God. These nations would gain much by studying that lesson closely. And it would be healthy for our own hearts to ponder it too.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Beyond verse 36

The chapter that threatens dispersion does not stop there.

A promise follows this threat: "But if they confess their iniquity… then I will remember my covenant with Jacob," and so on (vv. 40-42). That is, God would bring them back.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Shield — Israel's safety was God's presence, not their own strength. That presence stayed with an obedient people, and it would not cover disobedience.

- Withdrawal — The courage was God's gift, not Israel's own. When He took it back, abject terror filled its place.

- Terror — The judgment is inward. No enemy pursues, yet a rustling leaf drives them, and they are no help to one another.

- Witness — Scattered and wasted, the nation became a public lesson to every people about the moral government of God.

- Door — The chapter's last word is not terror but confession, and a covenant God remembers.

Leviticus 26:37 · Darby

and they shall stumble one over another, as it were before a sword, when none pursueth; and ye shall have no power to stand before your enemies.

Leviticus 26 sets two futures before Israel. Obedience brings God's presence and protection. Disobedience brings blow after blow of discipline. Verse 37 sits near the bottom of that second road. A nation that once could not be beaten now trips over its own people, and nobody is chasing them. Where had their strength gone?

Courage Turned to Terror

Courage had been God's gift to this people. Take it away and only terror is left:

Instead of the courage He once gave them against all odds, they would fall into abject terror.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where Their Strength Had Been

Their defence was never skill or weapons. It was God Himself, and He would not back disobedience:

The presence of God should always have been their shield and protection. No weapon formed against them could prosper. But only an obedient people could enjoy that presence. The Lord could not use His presence to approve disobedience or wickedness. The uncircumcised nations around them might depend on their own skill and weapons. Israel had only the arm of the Lord to depend on. That arm could never be stretched out to shield unholiness or disobedience. Their strength was to walk with God in a spirit of dependence and obedience.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why an Empty Field Terrifies

The sword in this verse is imaginary. The fear is real, and it has a source:

To fear an enemy much stronger than yourself is not blameworthy. But to fear when there is no reason to — when you cannot be beaten — is cowardice indeed, and scripture brands such a spirit. It is solemn to learn that scripture lists the "fearful" (cowardly) with the "unbelieving" among those condemned to the lake of fire (Revelation 21:8). An evil conscience makes a coward. "The wicked flee when no one pursues, but the righteous are bold as a lion" (Proverbs 28:1).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Small Evil Left Alone

One writer reads a later defeat the same way. The wrongdoer was one man; the weakness was the whole nation's:

It is not the wrongdoer alone, but Israel. The greater God's blessing to His people, the greater their responsibility. God's grace is rich: it deals with all our evil and puts it away. Yet whatever dishonours Him, after He has blessed us like this, makes us nothing before the enemy. The worst evil disappears before the power of redemption. But take an evil a man would count very small. If he holds on to it or overlooks it, it later becomes a source of weakness beyond measure in the presence of Satan. Is this a reason for distrust? Not in the least. It is the greatest possible reason for watchfulness and care.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Falling Over Each Other

The verse pictures men tripping over their own countrymen. Panic does not only destroy courage; it destroys the bond between them:

Fear of their enemies would be so great that the sound of a shaken leaf would make them flee. They would expect injury or death when no one was chasing them (v. 36). They would be no help to one another in their selfish anxiety to save themselves alone.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

History Read Aloud

These warnings did not stay on the page. Israel's later history put them on public display:

Under the heavy weight of these judgements they are suffering at this very hour. Scattered and stripped, wasted and outcast, they are the monuments of the Lord's unbending truth and justice. They read aloud, to all the nations of the earth, a most impressive lesson on the moral government of God. Those nations would gain much by studying that lesson deeply. Our own hearts would do well to think it over too.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Mercy at the Bottom

The chapter does not stop at the stumbling. The collapse has a purpose beyond itself:

Brought down in this way to the lowest misery and degradation, the goodness of God leads them to repentance. What a lesson to all the nations!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Presence — Their strength was never numbers or weapons; it was the Lord walking among them, and that arm "could never be stretched out to shield unholiness or disobedience."

- Withdrawal — Take that presence away and courage "against all odds" becomes "abject terror," with no enemy in sight.

- Conscience — The pursuer is inward. "An evil conscience makes a coward," which is why an empty field can rout an army.

- Leaven — Achan's hidden theft shows the size of the cause: "what a man would count a very little evil, if cherished or overlooked, becomes afterwards a source of incalculable weakness."

- Mercy — The misery is not the last word; brought to the lowest point, "the goodness of God leads them to repentance."

Leviticus 26:38 · Darby

And ye shall perish among the nations, and the land of your enemies shall eat you up.

Leviticus 26 has piled warning on warning, and here it reaches the lowest point: Israel is outside the land, swallowed up by the countries they fled to. Does "perish among the nations" mean the end of the nation?

The Last Blow in a Long Series

This sentence is not a sudden outburst. It closes a long story that started with God wanting to bless.

How ready the Lord was to bless His people! How full was the blessing He could give them, delighting as He would have done to walk among them. But they would not. So God had to deal with them in judgment. Yet how slow He was to anger! He sent each new blow only after the one before it had failed to bring them to repentance. At last exile had to be their lot.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Swallowed by the Lands That Sheltered Them

Verse 36 sets the scene. They run in panic, and the place of shelter consumes them.

Fear of their enemies would be so great that the sound of a shaken leaf would make them flee. They would expect injury or death when no one was pursuing them (v. 36). They would be no help to one another in their selfish anxiety to deliver themselves alone. In the lands where they had sought shelter they would be, in effect, "eaten up" (v. 38). Their iniquity would bring more and more suffering in their enemies' lands.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Prediction Turned into History

These words did not stay on the page.

This is so exactly true that we can describe the history of that nation, from the days of Moses until now, in one way. It is simply this chapter translated from the language of prediction into the language of history.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

That fulfilment is not only a fact about Israel. It is a public lesson about how God governs.

Scattered and stripped, wasted and outcast, they stand as monuments of Jehovah's truth and justice, which never bend. They read aloud, to all the nations of the earth, a striking lesson about the moral government of God. Those nations would gain much by studying that lesson closely. It would do our own hearts good to think about it too.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Perish, Yet Not Destroyed

The word "perish" is real, but it is not the chapter's last word. A few verses later God rules out the total end of the nation.

Yet the whole nation was not to perish. God would not cast them away, nor would He abhor them to destroy them utterly and break His covenant with them. For He was Jehovah their God.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Their survival through such judgment has only one explanation.

This chapter predicts that the people would pass through judgment, devastated by sword, famine and disease. Yet they would go on existing in their enemies' land. Israel's preservation throughout the long period of these executed judgments is a miracle. It cannot be explained in any other way.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Covenant That Outlives the Failure

If the people broke the agreement made at Mount Sinai, on what ground could they ever be restored? The answer reaches back past Sinai to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the fathers of the nation.

Leviticus 26 shows the results of Israel's disobedience. It brings out all their sad history until they "perish among the nations" (v. 38). But it adds something more. If they confess their sins while scattered — "if their uncircumcised hearts are humbled, and they then accept the punishment of their iniquity, then I will remember" — what? My covenant at Mount Sinai? No, but "My covenant with Jacob, and also My covenant with Isaac, and also My covenant with Abraham I will remember, and I will remember the land" (vv. 41, 42). Restoration, then, will be on the ground of the still unfulfilled covenant with the fathers.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Why does a promise made to people long dead still count?

The value of a covenant made with those who have died comes out here. The wrongdoing of later generations cannot set aside a covenant made with people who have already passed away, a covenant that was not cancelled before their death.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Government and Grace

Judgment belongs to God's government. Grace is another thing, and confusing the two damages both.

We are very prone to confuse two things that Scripture clearly distinguishes: God's government and God's grace. This confusion causes many evils. It is sure to weaken our sense of the dignity and seriousness of government. It also weakens our sense of the purity, fullness and height of grace.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Patience first. The exile came last, not first; every earlier blow was an appeal that failed to bring repentance.

- Consumed. The lands they fled to for shelter became the very thing that ate them up.

- Prediction. Israel's history since Moses is this chapter turned from prediction into history.

- Preserved. They perish, yet the nation is not destroyed. Only a miracle explains such survival.

- Remembered. Restoration rests on the older covenant with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, not on the broken agreement at Sinai. Government and grace must never be confused.

Leviticus 26:39 · Darby

And they that remain of you shall waste away through their iniquity in your enemies' lands; and also through the iniquities of their fathers shall they waste away with them.

Leviticus 26 promises blessing for obedience and warns of judgment after judgment for those who refuse to repent, ending with the people scattered in their enemies' lands. Verse 39 is the lowest point of that warning, and it raises two hard questions: what does it mean to rot away because of iniquity, and why are the fathers' sins named as well?

The bottom of a long descent

The verse is not a sudden stroke. It is the end of a chain in which each judgment answers a refusal to repent.

Then comes the effect of the broken covenant, described at length: judgments in stages, growing greater as they keep refusing to repent, ending in total scattering, and in their being consumed in their enemies' land.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Not weakness on God's part

Exile could look like proof that God was too weak to defend His people from invaders. The reason lay elsewhere.

But why should they experience the bitterness and degradation of exile? Why waste away in the land of their enemies? Jehovah was their God. Exile could never come from His being unable to shield them from the invader. But it could come from His being unwilling to do it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What wasting away means

The ESV says "rot away"; older translations read "waste away" or "pine away". The words describe more than a body wearing out. Writing on the same phrase in Ezekiel, one commentator shows what is left when guilt has nowhere to go.

The destruction that began was so sweeping that nothing would remain for them but wasting away in their iniquities and groaning to one another. Jehovah Himself was treating the sanctuary as common by His judgment, just as they had by their transgressions and their detestable practices. What a picture of despair! The sorrow lies too deep for tears, and an overwhelming sense of guilt forces people to abandon hope.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The fathers' sins named too

The verse adds the iniquities of the fathers. So does God punish children for what their parents did? One writer points to the exact wording God used, and to what God says elsewhere:

He has Himself assured us that He "visits the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generation." But He then adds a most necessary guard against what would otherwise be misread: "of those who hate Me." And elsewhere the Lord condemns in the strongest terms the proverb Israel had taken up from just such a misreading: "The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge." (Ezekiel 18) He not only says, but swears, that they will have no reason to use such a proverb. The son will not bear the iniquity of the father, and the father will not bear the iniquity of the son. The righteousness of the righteous will be on him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be on him. And the repentance of anyone will turn away his doom.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The chapter itself shows the way out. In the verses that follow, the people confess their own iniquity and their fathers' together. A later generation did this. One writer shows how deep their confession went.

They also confessed the iniquities of their fathers, and they did so because the Lord's hand had been on them for this very reason. It was because of the sins of their fathers that they had suffered captivity in Babylon... So they went down to the root of all the evil, and told out before God their fathers' sins as well as their own. Their humbling on that day, therefore, was no mere surface work.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Prophecy that became history

These warnings did not stay on the page. One commentator counts their fulfilment as proof that this book is inspired:

God calls this nation to blessing, yet He threatens it with the most awful judgments and disasters. And all of these have become historical facts. Jewish history, over many weary centuries, records how these solemn words kept coming true. So this chapter gives us very valuable and powerful evidence of inspiration: it foretold the curses, and history fulfilled them to the letter.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Not the last word

Verse 39 is the floor, not the end. One commentator reads even this lowest point as God's kindness at work.

When they are brought down like this to the lowest misery and shame, the goodness of God leads them to repentance. What a lesson to all the nations!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Graduated — the judgments in this chapter rise step by step as the people refuse to repent. Verse 39 is the last rung, not a random blow.

- Willing, not weak — exile never proved that God could not protect His people. It proved He chose not to.

- Wasting — to rot away in iniquity is to carry sin you never confess, a despair too deep for tears.

- Inherited — God visits the fathers' sins on those who share the fathers' hatred of Him. The cure is confession that goes to the root, naming their sins as well as our own.

- Restored — the lowest point is where God's goodness turns them to repentance, and every nation has a lesson to learn from it.