Leviticus 14:2–32

Leviticus 14:2 · Darby

This shall be the law of the leper in the day of his cleansing he shall be brought unto the priest,

Leviticus 13 ends with the leper shut outside the camp, calling out that he is unclean. Chapter 14 opens with God setting out the rules for the day that exclusion ends. The verse raises the question the whole chapter answers: on that day, who does the work?

Holiness first, then grace

The exclusion of chapter 13 was not God's last word on the man He had driven out. One commentator sets the two chapters side by side:

C. E. Stuart

Healed but not yet clean

The chapter assumes the disease has already stopped. That is a separate matter from the ceremony that follows:

Healing and purification are two different things. A man who is healed is not by that fact cleansed for God. No work in the soul, however necessary, can truly restore him. For that, God's grace in Christ must come in.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The priest in this chapter never cures anybody. His job is to give the verdict:

It was the priest's job to pronounce a leprous man unclean, and it was also his job to pronounce a man clean when he was cured. The law had no power to heal. It only took notice of whether a man had been healed or not. The work of ceremonial restoration started only after something else had already cured the disease.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

"He shall be brought" — not "he shall come"

The wording is passive, and that is deliberate:

So others seek out the person who is to be restored. He is not told to go and find the means of restoration himself. Hands are ready to serve him.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Someone unnamed does the bringing. One writer points to that friend as a model:

The friend who brought the leper to the priest mattered greatly. May we be more like him — unnamed, almost unmentioned, and yet the link in the chain without which the leper could not have been cleansed.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Out of the camp to the leper

The unclean man cannot come to where the priest lives, so the priest goes out to him:

Seen as a picture, the priest stands for the Mediator, the Saviour. As the leper could not come where He was, the priest must go out of the camp to the leper. Indeed "the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Telling the leper to come would have been useless advice, and the text never gives it:

It is not said, "the leper shall go." That was completely out of the question. It was no use talking to the leper about going or doing... He might make efforts to get clean, but his efforts could only prove him unclean and spread the defilement further. Before he could be pronounced "clean," a work had to be done for him. It was a work he could neither do nor help to do. Another had to carry it out entirely. The priest did it all. The leper did nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Clean by another's verdict, then clean in practice

The leper's certainty did not rest on his feelings but on a sentence spoken over him:

There the leper stood, looking at God's work for him, then receiving God's remedy, and hearing God's sentence. He did nothing to earn any good thing, but received everything from the God of Israel... Whatever he felt, and whatever others said to him, he knew he was under the power of the blood. Through that alone, God's Priest had "pronounced him clean."

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Only after that verdict does the man become active — and the reason for his activity has changed:

From verse 1 to the end of verse 7, as we have seen, the leper does nothing. All he brings to the priest is his leprosy and uncleanness. Everything is done for him. But the moment the priest has pronounced him clean and has let the bird go free, the leper begins to work. He does not work to be cleansed before God — he is clean before God already. He works to bring his outward life into line with his standing before God.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Healed — the cure comes first and comes from God alone; no ritual, effort or payment could produce it.

- Brought — the verb is passive on purpose. Someone else carries him in, and that unnamed friend is the link without which nothing happens.

- Met — the unclean man cannot come in, so the priest goes out to him.

- Pronounced — someone else speaks the verdict "clean" over him, so his assurance never rests on how he feels.

- Working — his work starts only after the verdict, and it brings his life into line with a standing he already has.

Leviticus 14:3 · Darby

and the priest shall go out of the camp; and when the priest looketh, and behold, the sore of leprosy is healed in the leper,

The law for cleansing a leper does not open with a command to the sick man. It opens with the priest, who goes out to the outcast, looks, and finds the disease already healed before any ceremony starts.

The Priest Goes, Not the Leper

The man shut out cannot come to God's house. So God's priest comes out to him.

So we read, "the priest shall go out of the camp." It is not said, "the leper shall go." That was out of the question. It was no use talking to the leper about going or doing. Shut up in dreary loneliness, where could he go? Held in helpless defilement, what could he do? … He might make efforts to get clean; but his efforts could only prove him unclean, and spread the defilement further. Before he could be pronounced "clean," a work had to be done for him. It was a work he could neither do nor help to do, a work that another had to carry out entirely… The priest accomplished all. The leper did nothing.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Outside the Camp

Commentators read the priest's walk out of the camp as a picture of Christ. He did not stay in glory. He came to where the defiled man was.

But the Priest Himself has made a way. So we read in verse 3, "the priest shall go out of the camp." The great High Priest, the Lord Jesus Christ, came out of His glory more than 1900 years ago. He came down to this sad, wicked world. Even down here, "He went out, bearing his own cross, to the place called The Place of a Skull." John 19:17. Yes, the Priest has already gone outside the gate. (Hebrews 13:12.) He sees you, poor defiled sinner, and He has already gone where you are.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Healed First, Then Cleansed

The verse assumes a cure that has already happened.

Note this carefully: the ceremonies did not cleanse the leper. They began only when it was clear that he was already cleansed. The healing that is in view is an act of God, which took place while the leper was still outside the camp. The priest had to go outside the camp and inspect him. If the man was cleansed, the priest had the responsibility of pronouncing him clean. He then carried out the set ceremony, which pictured the ground and basis of that cleansing.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What "Healed" Pictures

Leprosy stands for sin at work in a person. That makes healed and cleansed two different things.

In general, leprosy is sin acting in the flesh… Here its activity has been stopped, and so, though he is a leper, he is to be counted clean… Such a man was healed, but not yet cleansed. The sacrifices had not yet taken effect for him, and he was not yet back in relationship with God inside the camp. In the picture, he is a sinner judging himself before God. He is defiled by sin and knows it, and the activity of sin has stopped, because he is in the place of repentance… He is still a sinner. Though he has repented, the death and resurrection of Christ have not yet taken effect for him. But while he is still a sinner, the working of the flesh has now stopped, and so he may be said to be "healed."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Second Look

The priest had looked at this man before and shut him out. Now he looks again, searching for the opposite thing.

Those eyes of flame search you once again. Before they searched you to find if there was one spot of leprosy, and the priest had to pronounce you unclean. Now they search you to see if there is one spot without leprosy. If you truly are "all covered," the priest may pronounce you clean… In the same way, our Priest, the Lord Jesus Christ, searches the sinner who comes to Him. Is he truly coming as a poor, lost, ruined, guilty sinner? Has he no good word to say for himself? Is he full of sin?

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

How Far the Picture Reaches

William Kelly applies this first to Israel, driven out of their land as the leper was driven out of the camp — and then widens it.

Leprous Israel will certainly be cleansed. Prophecy declares it in sure, abundant, and glowing testimony… But here the picture is so general that we have no right to narrow how it applies. We should see instead how grace fits it to the need of every and any ruined sinner.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Distance. The leper stands outside, unable to come in, unable to clean himself, and able only to spread what he has.

- Descent. The priest crosses that distance himself. Commentators see the same move again when Christ went outside the gate.

- Cure. The healing is God's act, done before any ceremony starts. The ceremonies rest on it; they do not cause it.

- Inspection. The second look asks whether the plague is over. The sinner who admits he is wholly lost is the one who can be pronounced clean.

- Reach. Israel, driven out of the land, will be cleansed too. The picture is broad enough to cover any ruined sinner.

Leviticus 14:4 · Darby

then shall the priest command to take for him that is to be cleansed two clean living birds, and cedar-wood, and scarlet, and hyssop.

Leviticus 14 sets out what happens when a leper is healed and comes back among God's people. The list of items in this verse looks strange, so what is each one there to say?

Healing comes before the ceremony

The ritual of verse 4 is not what makes the leper well. By the time the priest gives this command, God has already healed him. The birds, wood and yarn only explain how.

We must carefully note that the ceremonies did not cleanse the leper. They only began when it was quite clear that he was cleansed. The healing in view is an act of God, which took place while the leper was still outside the camp. The priest had to go outside the camp and inspect him. If he was cleansed, the priest had to pronounce him clean. Then the priest carried out the prescribed ceremony, which pictured the ground and basis of his cleansing.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Taken for him

The priest commands every item, and others bring it for the leper. He does nothing himself.

On the face of it, others did the work for the leper first of all; he did none of it himself. The priest gave the command: take two clean living birds for the man to be cleansed, and cedar wood, scarlet and hyssop. Then he commanded further that one bird be killed in an earthen vessel over living water.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Then that changes. After the blood, the man has his own work to do.

So the leper stood by while the bird was killed for him, and he was sprinkled with its blood. But after this service he could act. First he washed his clothes, shaved off all his hair, and washed himself in water, so that he might be clean. After that he could enter the camp.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why the birds must be clean

The offering is small — just two birds. But one word in the command carries great weight.

When the leper was to be cleansed, God prescribed a very lowly offering — two sparrows. But they had to be clean. This is how God teaches us in pictures about His Holy One: "He committed no sin" (1 Peter 2:22); "who knew no sin" (2 Cor. 5:21); "in him there is no sin" (1 John 3:5).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Two birds: one killed, one released

One death is not the whole story. The priest dips the second bird in the blood of the first, tying the two together.

The two clean birds set forth Christ dead and risen — the one killed, the other let loose into the open field. But there is far more here, for the bird that was to die was killed in an earthen vessel over living water. How plainly this points to Him! Through the Eternal Spirit He offered Himself spotless to God, willing to be crucified in weakness. Again, see the pains taken to identify the living bird with the slain one. The priest dipped it in the blood of the bird killed over the living water. What could be clearer?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The second bird carries as much weight as the first.

In the slain bird He is delivered up for our trespasses; in the freed bird He is raised for our justification. It is liberty out of condemnation... Yet how few consider what the resurrection of Christ means. "If Christ has not been raised ... you are still in your sins." Without it there is no justification. There is no assurance that the sacrifice is enough and acceptable. There is no certainty that there will ever be any resurrection at all.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Cedar, scarlet and hyssop

The other three items cover the whole of nature and the glory of man.

Notice too that the cedar wood, the scarlet and the hyssop were to be dipped into the blood of the slain bird. The cedar is the most majestic of trees, hyssop is the humblest of herbs, and scarlet speaks of the glory of men. The death of Christ has stained the pride of all human glory. It has stained all that is natural to this first creation, from the greatest things to the least.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

They are dipped, not burned up. What the cleansed man keeps, he now sees differently.

He was to see all that belonged to nature, and the glory of the world, dipped in the blood of the slain bird. In the same way now, whatever matches those emblems should be seen through the cross. The cedar wood, hyssop and scarlet were not destroyed. Dipped in the blood, they appeared in a new light — and so should it be with us.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Healed first. The ceremony never cured anyone. It started only after God had healed the man, and it explained the basis of his cleansing.

- Done for him. The priest commands and handles every item on the man's behalf. The leper adds nothing to the work done for him.

- Clean birds. The birds had to be clean. That pictures the sinless One: He committed no sin, knew no sin, and in Him there is no sin.

- Dead and risen. The priest killed one bird in an earthen vessel over living water. He dipped the other in its blood and set it free: Christ delivered up for our trespasses, raised for our justification.

- Cedar to hyssop. The tallest tree, the lowest herb and the world's glory all go into the blood. The cleansed man then sees them through the cross. He washes, and comes home to the camp.

Leviticus 14:5 · Darby

And the priest shall command that one bird be killed in an earthen vessel over running water

The leprosy was already healed before this ceremony began. The rite that follows raises three questions: why a bird, why a clay pot, and why water as well as blood?

Everything Done For Him

The leper does not arrange his own cleansing. Another acts throughout.

We have seen that in the first place all was done for the leper, not by him. Another was active, not himself. He was to be brought to the priest; and the priest had to go out of the camp. The all-important thing was that the priest, not the leper, should look and find the sore of leprosy stopped — or rather healed. The priest had to direct the means then to be used.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Blood Must Be Shed

The priest's looking, by itself, changed nothing. A life had to be given up.

There was far more to be done than the Son being sent and becoming man. It would have helped the leper very little if the priest had merely gone out from the camp and looked on his low and miserable condition. Blood-shedding was absolutely necessary before leprosy could be removed. The death of a spotless victim was needed. "Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins" (Hebrews 9:22).

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The symptom itself looked tiny. Leprosy began as a bright spot on the skin.

Who would have thought that that little "bright spot" appearing on some member of the congregation was a matter of such grave consequence? But that little "bright spot" was nothing less than the energy of evil, showing itself openly. It was the sign of the dreadful working of sin in the nature. Before that person could be fit for a place in the assembly, or enjoy communion with a holy God, the Son of God had to leave those bright heavens and come down to the lowest parts of the earth, to make full atonement for what showed itself as only a little "bright spot."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A Bird In A Clay Pot

The verse names no species. A creature of the sky dies shut inside earth.

An earthen vessel; inside that earthen vessel, a pure spotless bird. The heavens are the home of the bird — the heavens are its native air — but it comes down and enters a vessel of earth. And in that earthen vessel it is killed. What a picture of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. He leaves His home in the heavens, He leaves His throne above, He comes down to this sad world and takes a body of earth.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Another writer reads each part of the picture, and notes what the figure does not show.

The bird represents the Lord as a heavenly Being, gaining the capacity to suffer and die in the manhood He had taken; the earthen vessel pictures that manhood. The living water here, as ever, is a type of the Eternal Spirit through whom He offered Himself without blemish to God. It is striking that the figure does not show the vessel broken while the bird escapes unhurt. It shows the death of the bird itself, and Scripture is always divinely perfect: such apparent slips are not blemishes, nor even the unavoidable shortfall of all figures, but things that call for the deepest and most reverent attention.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The Living Water

Writers render the "fresh water" of this verse as running, or living, water. One presses it toward the reader, as the means by which Christ's death comes home to a particular person.

The bird was killed over "running water." Water is a type of the word of God as applied by the Holy Spirit, and running water speaks of the Holy Spirit in activity. "Christ … through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without blemish to God" (Hebrews 9:14).

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Others press the same water toward the hearer, as the means by which that death reaches a particular person.

Running water has life and power in it. Water in the Bible very often speaks of the Word of God. And the running, or living, water tells us of the living Word of God, applied by the Spirit of God to our hearts. It takes the death of Christ, and tells me in the living power of the Spirit that the Lord Jesus Christ died for me. It was for my sins that He suffered. You have often seen that bird killed in the earthen vessel. But, dear reader, have you ever seen Him killed over the running water?

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Why Water As Well As Blood

The blood of this bird does not go in to God as a ransom. Its aim lies elsewhere.

The object of the birds was the cleansing of the leper; it was application to the defiled man, not the ransom presented to God. It could only happen on the ground of the blood-shedding and satisfaction. But the immediate action was the purifying, so there was water as well as blood. The Spirit, in the power of the word, makes the death of Christ available in the power of His resurrection.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Healed first. The ceremony begins only after the leprosy is healed. The rite shows the ground of cleansing; it does not produce the cure.

- Commanded, not earned. The priest orders every step. Another acts for the man, who does nothing himself.

- Death required. A look of pity would not have cleansed him. A spotless life had to be given up.

- Heaven in clay. A bird of the sky dies inside a vessel of earth. That earth pictures the manhood Christ took, and the bird dies, not just the vessel.

- Living water. The running water speaks of the Spirit through whom Christ offered Himself, and of the word that brings His death home to the heart. The aim of the whole rite is to purify the defiled man.

Leviticus 14:6 · Darby

as to the living bird -- he shall take it, and the cedar-wood, and the scarlet, and the hyssop, and dip them and the living bird in the blood of the bird that was killed over the running water;

The cleansing of a healed leper begins with a strange scene: one bird killed, and a second bird dipped in its blood and set free. Why two birds rather than one, and why bind wood, dye and a common herb into the ceremony at all?

Two birds, one death

The two birds are not two sacrifices. They are one picture in two halves.

The two clean birds set forth Christ dead and risen — the one killed, the other let loose into the open field. But there is far more here, for the bird that was to die was killed in an earthen vessel over living water. How plainly this points to Him! Through the Eternal Spirit He offered Himself spotless to God, willing to be crucified in weakness. So Christ was given up for our offences and raised for our justification, as the apostle says (Rom. 4:25).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The clay pot and the water

Two details fix where the bird died: a clay pot, and fresh running water.

One bird was killed in a clay pot over running water. That is of course the death of Christ come in the flesh — the clay pot — and it cannot be separated from the living water of the word. Birds belong to the sky, so a case like this one calls for the highest thought of His being and His person.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The dipping that joins them

The dipping ties the two birds together. The living one does not just outlive the other; it carries its blood.

The priest takes the second bird, the living bird, along with the cedar wood, scarlet and hyssop. He plunges them all under the blood of the dead victim. He then sprinkles the leper seven times from it. This identifies the man in the most solemn way with everything that has happened. He then lets the living bird loose in the open field, and the leper is pronounced clean. The meaning of all this is very plain. It is the death and resurrection of Christ. In the slain bird He is delivered for our offences; in the freed bird He is raised again for our justification. It is liberty out of condemnation... the bird being dipped in the blood of the slain one is identified with it. It is in a sense the same bird.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Blood carried upward, not inward

Where the blood goes next also matters.

The bird that was released was first dipped in the blood of the slain bird, and so was identified with it. Two birds were needed in the type to set forth Christ in death and in resurrection. As the released bird soared into the heavens it carried the blood not into the sanctuary but into the heavens. This was the basis of all that followed.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Cedar, scarlet and hyssop

Three ordinary materials go under the blood with the bird.

Notice too that the cedar wood, the scarlet and the hyssop were to be dipped into the blood of the slain bird. The cedar is the most majestic of trees, hyssop is the humblest of herbs, and scarlet speaks of the glory of men. The death of Christ has stained the pride of all human glory. It has stained all that is natural to this first creation, from the greatest things to the least.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

So what became of the three materials themselves?

He was to see all that was of nature, and the glory of the world, dipped in the blood of the slain bird. In the same way now, whatever answers to those emblems should be viewed through the cross. The cedar wood, hyssop and scarlet were not destroyed. When dipped in the blood they appeared in a new light, and so should it be with us.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Where the leper stands

Through all of this the man himself does nothing. He is present, but the priest acts.

On the face of it, the work was first of all done for the leper, not in the least degree by himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Only afterwards does he act, and his washing follows the cleansing:

So the leper stood by while the bird was killed for him, and he was sprinkled with its blood. But once this service was done, he was able to act. The first thing he did was wash his clothes, shave off all his hair, and wash himself in water, so that he might be clean. After that he could enter the camp.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Two birds, one Saviour. One killed, one released — the same life seen through death and out the other side, "in a sense the same bird."

- Dipped, therefore joined. The living bird is bound to the slain one by its blood. Death and resurrection are one picture, not two.

- Blood that flies. The blood does not go into the sanctuary but into the open sky. That ascent is the basis of all that follows.

- Cedar to hyssop. The highest and the lowest of nature go under the blood, and scarlet for human glory with them. The cross leaves nothing in the old creation untouched.

- Done for him. The leper only stands there while it is done; his washing comes after the blood, never instead of it.

Leviticus 14:7 · Darby

and he shall sprinkle upon him that is to be cleansed from the leprosy seven times, and shall pronounce him clean, and shall let the living bird loose into the open field.

In this verse a leper stops being unclean, and he does none of it himself: the priest sprinkles, the priest speaks, the priest lets the bird fly. What made him clean, who could say so, and why did one bird go free?

Blood Alone

How much leprosy a man had made no difference to where he stood:

The leprosy might be great or small, many spots or few, long-standing or recent. Still the leper was unclean. He was utterly unclean, unfit for the camp of Israel, until the priest sprinkled him with the blood of the sacrifice. Every other washing was useless, every other remedy pointless. He could go here or there, do this or that, cover his spots and hide his sores — he was still utterly unclean. But the moment the priest sprinkled him with the blood, he pronounced him clean. It was the blood that made the difference.

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Seven Times

The count of seven carries its own message:

The priest then sprinkled the blood seven times on the leper, and when this was done he pronounced him "clean." Seven tells of the perfect application of the blood, for "the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin" (1 John 1:7)... sprinkling the blood seven times was enough for the priest to pronounce him clean.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Who Says "Clean"

The verse hands both the sprinkling and the verdict to the priest, never to the man:

It belonged to God, and to Him alone, to plan and carry out a work that could cleanse the leprosy perfectly. And it belonged to God, and to Him alone, to pronounce the leper "clean." So Scripture says that the priest shall sprinkle, and "he shall pronounce him clean." It does not say, "the leper shall sprinkle, and pronounce, or imagine, himself clean." That would never do. God was the Judge — God was the Healer — God was the Cleanser... There is the most precious connection between the three things in verse 7: the blood is sprinkled, the leper pronounced clean, and the living bird let loose. Not a single syllable tells us what the leper was to do, to say, to think, or to feel.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same writer turns this on anyone who waits to feel forgiven:

So many are troubled by the question of feeling it, realising it, and making it their own. They fail to see what the leper's case shows: the sprinkling of the blood was as independent and as divine as the shedding of it... The plan of deliverance was divine; the provision of the sacrifice was divine; the shedding of the blood was divine; the sprinkling of the blood was divine. The record of the result was divine. In short, it was all divine.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Bird Let Loose

Only after the blood and the verdict does the second bird go free:

We could hardly have a more perfect picture of the resurrection of Christ than the living bird let loose into the open field. It was not let go until its companion had died. The two birds stand for one Christ in two stages of His blessed work — death and resurrection. Ten thousand birds let loose would not have availed for the leper. It was that living bird, rising into the open heavens, carrying on its wing the sign that atonement was finished. That is what announced the great fact: the work was done.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where that blood was carried is itself part of the picture:

The priest first dipped the living bird in the blood of the slain bird, marking it as one with it... As the released bird soared upward, it carried the blood into the heavens, not into the sanctuary. This was the basis of all that followed.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Cedar, Scarlet, Hyssop

The blood touched more than the man:

The cedar wood, the scarlet and the hyssop were also dipped in the blood of the bird that was slain, and this has a worthy meaning. The death of Christ has pronounced, for the one who is cleansed, death on everything man deals with here. The chosen emblems of the highest in nature and of the lowest, along with that which pictures the conventional glory of the world, were dipped in the blood... every evil is counteracted for the believer in Christ's atoning death.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Clean, Then Cleansing

The verdict is not the end. Washing and shaving follow in verses 8 and 9:

It may seem strange that the priest pronounced the leper clean in verse 7. Yet this is the sure and cheering ground on which he begins the practical work of cleansing himself in verses 8 and 9. God's own verdict gives the highest assurance. It does not cancel the moral cleansing the LORD calls for in every respect. On the contrary, it gives priceless encouragement to start on every detail and work it through.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood — no washing, no cover-up and no improvement touched leprosy. The sprinkled blood alone made the difference between unclean and clean.

- Seven — seven sprinklings mark the cleansing as perfect. Nothing had to be added to it.

- Verdict — the man never sprinkles himself or calls himself clean. The plan, the sacrifice, the shedding, the sprinkling and the record all come from God.

- Flight — the freed bird carries its companion's blood up into the heavens. It pictures the resurrection, announcing that the work is done.

- Then walk — the verdict of verse 7 does not replace the washing of verses 8 and 9. Being called clean is the ground on which practical cleansing starts.

Leviticus 14:8 · Darby

And he that is to be cleansed shall wash his garments, and shave all his hair, and bathe in water, and he shall be clean; and afterwards shall he come into the camp, and shall abide outside his tent seven days.

Leviticus 14 describes how a man healed of a skin disease was brought back from exile to the people of God. Verse 8 comes after the priest has already declared him clean — so why is there still washing, shaving and a seven-day wait outside his own tent?

Pronounced Clean First, Then Cleansing

Verse 8 marks a turn in the chapter.

If you have followed the first seven verses of this chapter, you will have noticed something. The man does not have to do one single thing. Everything was done for him... But now all is changed. Now the leper starts to work.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The order matters. The washing does not earn the verdict; the verdict makes the washing possible.

It may seem strange that the priest pronounced the leper clean back in verse 7. But that verdict is the sure and cheering ground for starting the practical work of cleansing himself in verses 8 and 9. Being pronounced clean by divine authority gives the highest assurance. It does not replace the moral cleansing the Lord calls for in every respect. On the contrary, it gives priceless encouragement to go into every detail and work through it, as here.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Blood and Water

The priest sprinkled blood on him in verse 7. Now water comes in, and the two are not interchangeable.

The blood shed and sprinkled, precious and effective as it is judicially for the unclean, is not all. There is and must be a moral cleansing also by the water of the word applied to the sinner. Out of the pierced side of Jesus flowed not blood only but water... The sinner needs for blessing not only expiation, but purification.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

They also differ in how often each one comes.

The bird was slain only once. The blood was sprinkled only once, but the water may be applied many times... This showed the constant need for cleansing from the defilements of this world. Not by blood — that was done once, and once only — but by water, the water of the Word.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The Clothes

The first thing washed is not the man himself but what he wears.

The clothes tell us of that which touches us — our associations — that with which we have to do, that which the world around sees as connected with us. Perhaps people have been used to seeing us in the gambling halls, or in other evil places. All these associations and ways must be "washed." How do we wash our ways and associations? We get that question answered for us in Psalm 119:9 — "How can a young man keep his way pure?" That is the question. Here is God's own answer: "By guarding it according to your word."

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

This is also what makes him fit to walk back in among the people.

The blood has been applied in its expiating power. Then comes the washing of water. This expresses the action of the word on the character, the habits, the ways. It makes the person fit for a place in the public assembly, morally and practically — and not only in God's view, but in the view of the congregation too.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Shaving Off All the Hair

The shaving was no small thing for an Israelite.

It was a mark of shame and reproach... But now all this hair must come off. All his own natural beauty and glory must go. Everything that might shelter any uncleanness must be cut off, at any cost.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The cost showed the moment he walked down the street.

In that land every man had a fine head of hair and a big bushy beard. So the cleansed leper, without hair or beard, would indeed be a spectacle. As he walked down the street, many a finger would point at him, many a joke would be cracked at his expense. But was it not worth while? Was it not infinitely better to be cleansed and among the Lord's people without a beard, than to wander outside the camp with a beard, crying "Unclean! Unclean!"

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Inside the Camp, Outside the Tent

The verse grants him one thing and withholds another: he may enter the camp, but not his own tent, for a week.

He had been sprinkled with blood and washed with water. That entitled him to a place in the public assembly. Even so, he could not enter his own tent. He could not yet enjoy the private, personal privileges that belonged to his own particular place in the camp. In other words, he knew redemption through the shed and sprinkled blood, and he took the word as the rule for his person and all his habits. But he had still to be brought, in the power of the Spirit, into full and intelligent communion with his own place, portion, and privileges in Christ.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer draws the same distinction as two stages — public restoration first, then the eighth day:

First, the restoration to a place among the people of God, from whom he had been separated; and this is done upon the first day, when he returns to the camp; secondly, on the eighth day, there is a new and only now complete cleansing, by which he is brought fully to God, and restored to his tent also.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Verdict, then work. The man washes because the priest has already declared him clean, not to get himself declared clean. Up to verse 7 he does nothing at all.

- Blood, then water. The blood dealt with guilt once and for all. The water of the word keeps working on habits, again and again.

- Clothes, then hair. First the outer layer — the company and ways that others see, washed by heeding God's word. Then his own natural beauty and glory go, whatever people say.

- Camp, then tent. Cleansing restores him to public fellowship at once, but private enjoyment of his own place waits for the days that follow.

Leviticus 14:9 · Darby

And it shall come to pass on the seventh day, that he shall shave all his hair, his head, and his beard, and his eyebrows, even all his hair shall he shave, and he shall wash his garments, and shall bathe his flesh in water, and he is clean.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Leviticus 14:10 · Darby

And on the eighth day he shall take two he-lambs without blemish, and one yearling ewe-lamb without blemish, and three tenth parts of fine flour mingled with oil, for an oblation, and one log of oil.

The priest declares the healed leper clean — but the instructions do not stop there. On the eighth day he comes back with lambs, flour and oil in hand. Why does a clean man still need a whole set of offerings? What do the things in his hands stand for?

The eighth day

Scripture does not call this day the first day of a new week. It calls it the eighth.

"The eighth day" in Scripture seems to have a special significance. Seven days completed the week, ending with the Sabbath on the seventh day. The following day was "the morrow after the Sabbath," or the first day of a new week. But here it is not called the first day, or "the morrow after the Sabbath," but "the eighth day." … In these verses we have, in picture, an entirely new beginning. Christ has reigned on this earth for a thousand years. All sin is put down. The devil is banished forever. And an eternity of joy and peace begins. It is truly a new beginning for all: as the Lord says, "Behold, I am making all things new." Revelation 21:5.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Clean, and still bringing offerings

The man has already been declared clean. The offerings of this verse come after that verdict, not before it.

Though at the end of verse 9 the leper is now said to be clean, yet on this same eighth day he must bring two male lambs, one ewe lamb of the first year, all without blemish … and one log of oil.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Every offering in his hands

The list is not random. The animals, the flour and the oil cover almost the whole range of Israel's offerings — and the man carries them all.

Now the man who was so recently an outcast leper comes to be presented before the Lord. In his hand is every offering but the peace offering. They tell out all the various aspects and excellencies of the mighty sacrifice of Christ Himself. The trespass offering, meal offering, sin offering and burnt offering are all included. So is the log of oil, which tells of the Holy Spirit, through whom Christ offered Himself. (Hebrews 9:14.) Because of these offerings the man once so far off comes near, so very near to God.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The trespass offering first

The priest kills one of the two male lambs first. He kills it as a trespass offering — the offering for wrong actually done.

The entire range of offerings is brought in here. But the trespass offering is killed first, because the leper is seen as an actual trespasser. This is true in every case. As those who have trespassed against God, we need Christ as the one who atoned, on the cross, for those trespasses. "He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree." The first view the sinner gets of Christ is as the reality that the trespass offering pictured.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The ceremony that set apart the priests started from a different offering.

The ritual of the eighth day points forward to the work of Christ in the light of His resurrection. It points to how richly the Christian takes hold of that work, and to the gift of the Holy Spirit that follows. … Here the conscience is cleansed from dead works, so that the man may serve or worship a living God. He is at home, as it were, coming not just into the camp but into his tent. In its measure this is a consecration like the priests'. Only here it rests not on a sin offering (Lev. 8:14; Lev. 9:2) but on a trespass offering (Lev. 14:12-13), because a holy relationship had been violated and that had to be met.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fine flour mixed with oil

The flour offering carries its own picture — not of death, but of a life.

The meal offering showed something more: all the perfectness of the grace of Christ in His life. Here is humanity, pure without doubt, but kneaded with oil. It is humanity with all the strength, the taste, and savour of the Holy Spirit in its nature. That is the aspect presented here: not humanity anointed with oil — that is, power — but humanity kneaded with oil in its substance.

after_note: DELETE Now the man is clean.

J. N. Darby

One log of oil

One log is a small, fixed measure, and it has to serve the whole ceremony.

It is lovely to see the way that oil never fails. It is sprinkled before the Lord seven times. It is put on the ear, thumb and toe of the leper. And there is still more left. It reminds us of the word, "he gives the Spirit without measure." John 3:34. Whatever need we have for His power and energy, we may be sure that the Spirit of God is more than enough for our every need.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

When the full amount was out of reach

The list here is the full requirement. Later in the chapter a smaller list is allowed, and commentators note what may be reduced and what may not.

The allowance of grace here is only for falling short on the eighth day, and it is here that poverty is found now and has long been found. Few rise up to the riches of God's grace in its Christian form and fulness. But the principle must be maintained if the right measure is lacking. … The priest began with the lamb slain for a trespass offering, and not a sin offering simply, still less a ram of consecration of sweet savour. … The defilement must be felt and met adequately.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- New day. The eighth day is not simply the next day; it marks an entirely new beginning, all things made new.

- Already clean. The verdict of cleanness comes first, in verse 9; the offerings of verse 10 follow it rather than earn it.

- Full hands. The man carries nearly every offering at once, each one telling out a different excellence of the one sacrifice of Christ.

- Trespass first. The first lamb dies as a trespass offering, because a holy relationship had been violated and must be met.

- Oil left over. One log serves the whole ceremony, and there is still more left — the Spirit given without measure.

Leviticus 14:11 · Darby

And the priest that cleanseth [him] shall present the man that is to be cleansed and those things before Jehovah, at the entrance of the tent of meeting.

It is the eighth day. A man who a week earlier was shut outside the camp now stands at the entrance of the tent of meeting. Two things stand out. He does not walk up on his own; the priest presents him. And he does not come empty-handed.

The Eighth Day

The timing is not accidental. Scripture gives the eighth day a meaning of its own.

Seven days completed the week, ending with the Sabbath on the seventh day. The following day was "the morrow after the Sabbath," or the first day of a new week. But here it is not called the first day, or "the morrow after the Sabbath," but "the eighth day." In Leviticus 23 we can notice the difference. In verses 11, 15 and 16 we read of "the morrow after the Sabbath." These verses tell in type of the resurrection of Christ and the coming of the Holy Spirit. But in verses 36 and 39 we do not get "the morrow after the Sabbath," but "the eighth day." In these verses we have, in figure, an entirely new beginning. As the Lord says, "Behold, I am making all things new."

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Presented, Not Self-Introduced

The man had already washed himself and shaved off all his hair. That mattered, but it did not open the door.

On the first day the priest went out to the leper; on the eighth day the former leper took his place at the door of the tent of meeting, but only with the appointed sacrifices. Without them he could have had no business there. Only on the ground of sacrifice could he again stand at the place where the people gathered to meet with God. Unless he had washed and shaved, it would have been presumption to draw near. But without the sacrifices as well, he had no right to approach. And even with these, he needed the priest to present him before the Lord.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The Nearness He Is Given

What he carries in his hand decides how near he may come.

Now that man who so recently was an outcast leper comes to be presented before the Lord. In his hand is every offering except the peace offering. They tell out all the various aspects and excellencies of the mighty sacrifice of Christ Himself. The trespass offering, grain offering, sin offering and burnt offering are all included. So is the log of oil, which tells of the Holy Spirit, through whom Christ offered Himself (Hebrews 9:14). By virtue of these offerings the man once so far off approaches so near, so very near to God. I do not recall any other Israelite, apart from the priests and Levites, who came so near the Lord. No one else had this wonderful privilege of being presented before the Lord in this way.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Why the Trespass Offering Leads

The verse brings the man and the whole set of offerings forward together. Which one comes first carries meaning.

The whole range of offerings is introduced here. But the trespass offering is killed first, because the leper is viewed as an actual trespasser. As those who have trespassed against God, we need Christ as the one who atoned on the cross for those trespasses. The first view the sinner gets of Christ is as the fulfilment of the trespass offering.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A Consecration Like a Priest's

What follows this presentation repeats the ceremony that set the priests apart, with one difference.

Here we have the conscience cleansed from dead works to serve or worship a living God, and to be at home, as it were, coming not merely into the camp but into his tent. In its measure it is a consecration like the priests'. Only here it is founded not on a sin offering but on a trespass offering. A holy relationship had been violated, and that had to be met. And the priest applied its blood to the right ear, right thumb, and right big toe. The whole man is brought under the most holy blood — what he hears and does, and his walk. He belongs wholly to God in thought, work, and way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the Picture Points

The New Testament uses the same word — present — for what God does with people who were once shut out.

That man only eight days before had been a vile leper, outside the camp, crying, "Unclean! Unclean!" Now he is brought, not only inside the camp, but to the house of God, and there presented before the Lord. Happy, wonderful, blessed place! Yet that place is ours. "And you, who once were alienated and hostile in mind, doing evil deeds, he has now reconciled in his body of flesh by his death, in order to present you holy and blameless and above reproach before him" (Colossians 1:21-22). "Alienated and hostile in mind" exactly describes the leper outside the camp.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Brought. He is presented; he does not present himself. Washing and shaving were not enough.

- Bought. He stands at the door on the ground of sacrifice alone. Without the offerings he had no business there.

- Nearest. Sacrifice carries a former outcast as near to God as priests and Levites came.

- Claimed. Blood on ear, hand and foot marks the whole man as God's — what he hears, what he does, where he walks.

- New. The eighth day is not day one again but a fresh beginning, pointing on to the day God makes all things new.

Leviticus 14:12 · Darby

And the priest shall take one he-lamb, and present it for a trespass-offering, and the log of oil, and wave them as a wave-offering before Jehovah.

On the eighth day the healed leper stood at the tent door with lambs, flour, and a small measure of oil. The priest took one lamb for a guilt offering and waved it alive before the LORD — why that offering, and why alive?

Why a Trespass Offering Comes First

The chapter calls for several offerings. The one killed first — the guilt, or trespass, offering — tells us how the leper is still seen.

This chapter brings in the whole range of offerings. But the trespass offering is killed first, because the leper counts as an actual trespasser. This is true in every case. We have trespassed against God, so we need Christ as the One who atoned on the cross for those trespasses. "He Himself bore our sins in His body on the tree." The sinner's first sight of Christ is as the One that trespass offering pictured.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer reads the whole eighth day as a picture, and notes which sacrifice the leper's restoration rests on.

The ritual of the eighth day pictures the work of Christ in the light of His resurrection, the rich share the Christian has in it, and the gift of the Holy Spirit that follows. In its measure this is a consecration like the priests'. But here it rests on a trespass offering, not a sin offering, because a holy relationship had been broken and that had to be met.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Waved Before It Was Killed

Here the priest lifts a living lamb. Commentators differ on what this points to. One sees a life lived wholly for God — the very thing the man had failed in.

The priest brought the lamb to the altar, waved it, and then killed it. This order appeared only on this occasion. Note that the lamb was waved before death. That was the token that the man here on earth should be for God, as the One whom that lamb pictured was for God in His life. And here, when we read his history as a picture, is exactly where the man had failed.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Another sees the lifting itself as the point.

The waving speaks of Christ ascended back to glory, though in the picture the waving came before the killing of the sacrifice.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The Oil Lifted With the Lamb

The lamb does not go up alone. The priest waves the log of oil with it.

What joy beyond words for the Lord to receive that lamb of the trespass offering, along with the poor leper! It told of that Lamb of God's own providing, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. It told of God's only Son. And with it was the log of oil, speaking of the Holy Spirit. The three Persons of the Trinity are all engaged in welcoming the ransomed sinner to His home above.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Neither part can be spared. But the picture has a limit.

Without the atonement we could not receive the Holy Spirit. Without the Spirit we have no power to serve God. The priest's action here reminds us of these things. But we must not take that action to teach that the Spirit is received a second time. That can no more happen than the Lord can die again.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The Offering Belongs to the Priest

The priest does not only offer this lamb — he also eats it.

But the trespass offering, like the sin offering, was the priest's. When the priest eats the trespass offering he makes the trespass of the man who offers it his own. What unspeakable grace! And this is just what our great High Priest has done for us.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The One Offering Nobody Could Skip

God makes room for a man too poor to bring all of this. But the allowance stops at one point.

If a man could not obtain everything the law prescribed, God would accept smaller offerings for the grain, sin, and burnt offerings. No one was to be left outside for lack of the means of full restoration. Yet all had to bring the sacrifice appointed for the first day, and the lamb for the trespass offering. No one could set these aside. Everyone alike had to own, in this picture, the ground he stands on and his need of a sacrifice to restore him. The words of the woman of Tekoa are true here, and this rule for the leper reminds us of them: God "devises means so that the banished one will not be an outcast."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Trespass. The healed man is still treated as one who wronged God; the first offering names the debt, not just the stain.

- Relation. The offering is a trespass offering, not a sin offering: a holy relationship had been broken, and that breach had to be met.

- Lifted. The lamb is waved alive — pointing, some say, to a life lived wholly for God, and others to Christ raised to glory.

- Paired. The oil rises with the lamb — Son and Spirit together welcome the restored man: atonement first, then power to serve.

- Limit. God lowers the cost for the poor, but never removes this lamb — no one is restored on any other ground.

Leviticus 14:13 · Darby

And he shall slaughter the he-lamb at the place where the sin-offering and the burnt-offering are slaughtered, in a holy place; for as the sin-offering, so the trespass-offering is the priest's it is most holy.

Leviticus 14 sets out how a person healed of a serious skin disease came back into God's presence. Verse 13 settles two things about the first offering he brings: where the lamb dies, and who it belongs to.

Why a Guilt Offering Leads

Older translations call the guilt offering the trespass offering. The reason it comes first lies in how the man is regarded:

The whole range of offerings comes in here. But the trespass offering is killed first, because the leper is viewed as an actual trespasser. This is true in every case. As those who have trespassed against God, we need Christ as the One who atoned, on the cross, for those trespasses. "He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree." The first view a sinner gets of Christ is as the fulfilment of the trespass offering.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The disease was more than defilement to wash away. It was a wrong done to God, and that changes what a person must learn about himself:

Leprosy was counted not only unclean, but an actual trespass against the Lord, calling for the trespass offering. So we need to realise that sin does more than defile us. Each one of us has "sinned against the Lord." It is good when we are brought to cry, "Against you, you only, have I sinned." Psalm 51:4. The poor prodigal had to learn that lesson, as we see when he cried, "I have sinned against heaven, and before you." Luke 15:21.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

The Place of the Killing

The place of the killing matters. So does what the man learns from it:

One male lamb is offered for him as a trespass offering. So his sin is confessed and judged. The lamb is even killed in the place where the sin offering and the burnt offering are killed. He knows it is for him, and it shows him that his sin is forgiven by it, so that in this way he can approach the sanctuary of God.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

He had often stood in that place before, with no sacrifice needed. Coming back was different:

Suppose he had dared to come there just because he had washed his body and shaved off all his hair. Would he have been received? Certainly not. Unless he had washed and shaved, it would have been presumption to draw near. But without the sacrifices too, he had no right to approach. And even with these, he needed the priest to present him before the Lord. Now, presented in the right way, he stood where he might often have stood before without needing a sacrifice or any priest to present him. He learned that there was a way back into God's presence, but death alone could open it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The Offering Belongs to the Priest

The verse gives the offering to the priest, exactly as the sin offering was given. What the priest then does with it points to Christ:

But the trespass offering, like the sin offering, was the priest's. When the priest eats the trespass offering he makes the trespass of the man who offers it his own. What indescribable grace! And this is just what our great High Priest has done for us.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

"It Is Most Holy"

Why is the offering for wrongdoing ranked most holy?

Granted, the offering was to meet a specific failure, against God or against man. It dealt not with moral wrong only, but with failure in their relationship before Jehovah. All the more necessary, then, that the trespass offering should be most holy. Even in human matters, the wrong was "against Jehovah," and it demanded full satisfaction in both directions. It is found perfectly and only in Jesus Christ and Him crucified. And it produces results even now toward people as well as toward God. See Saul the persecutor become Paul the sufferer. See the proud, abusive man become a lowly servant of God and of man for Jesus' sake. Never did the holiness of God stand out so clearly. Never did it receive such immeasurable evidence as when God made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us — yes, a curse for those under the curse — so that those who believe on Him should be cleared for ever.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Foundation of the Eighth Day

Everything that follows on the eighth day rests on this one lamb. The ceremony echoes another one:

It is, in its own measure, a consecration like the priests'. Only here it is founded not on a sin offering (Lev. 8:14; Lev. 9:2) but on a trespass offering (Lev. 14:12-13); for a holy relationship had been violated, and that had to be met.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Trespass. The healed man is treated as one who wronged God, not just as one who was unclean — so a guilt offering leads the way.

- Place. The lamb dies where the sin and burnt offerings die, in the holy place. A way back into God's presence exists, but death alone opens it.

- Priest's. The offering becomes the priest's — a picture of the High Priest making the offerer's trespass His own.

- Most holy. A holy relationship was broken, so the offering that repairs it ranks as most holy. God's holiness shines brightest there.

- Foundation. The whole eighth-day consecration rests on this lamb. The restored man is set apart by a guilt offering, not by his own washing.

Leviticus 14:14 · Darby

And the priest shall take of the blood of the trespass-offering, and the priest shall put it on the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and on the thumb of his right hand, and on the great toe of his right foot.

A skin disease had shut this man out of the camp. He is well again, and on the eighth day the priest marks him with sacrificial blood — ear, thumb and toe, each on the right side. Why those three places, and why blood on a man who is already healed? (Where the commentators below say "trespass offering," they are using the older rendering of what the ESV calls the guilt offering.)

Why this offering, and why the eighth day

The eighth day opens with a sacrifice, and it is not the sacrifice used to install priests.

The ritual of the eighth day points forward to the work of Christ, seen in the light of His resurrection. It points to all the Christian gains from it, and to the gift of the Holy Spirit that follows... Here the conscience is cleansed from dead works, to serve or worship a living God, and to be at home — coming not merely into the camp, but into his tent. It is in its measure a consecration like the priests'. Only here it rests on a trespass offering, not on a sin offering. A holy relationship had been violated, and that had to be met. And the priest applied its blood to the right ear, right thumb, and right great toe. The most holy blood covers the whole man — what he hears, what he does, and how he walks. He belongs wholly to God in thought, work, and way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Priests received blood on those same three places when they were set apart. But their blood came from a different sacrifice.

The blood put on the leper's ear, thumb and great toe came from a trespass offering, because what is pictured there is the cleansing of a sinner. But the blood that consecrated priests for God's service came from a communion offering.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Three points that stand for the whole person

Ear, hand and foot together map out a life.

In cleansing the leper, and in consecrating the priest, the blood goes on three parts of the man: the tip of the right ear, the thumb of the right hand, and the great toe of the right foot. Together these three show what he is. By the ear he is to receive the word of God; with the hand, to do the enjoined work; with the foot, to walk in His blessed ways. This is clearly the man in his whole responsibility.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The ear comes first

The order matters. Hearing comes before doing and walking — and one Man had His ear opened with no blood at all.

Then the blood goes on the ear. If I am to do the will of God, I must know it. The ear is cleansed first; then come the hands to do and the feet to walk. The blessed Lord had His ear opened, but no blood was needed there. He was sinless.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A claim, not just a cleansing

The ritual is God stating a claim over the person He has restored.

This symbolized two things. First, there is no approach to God except on the ground of the atoning sacrifice of our Lord. Second, the amazing love of that Sacrifice claims nothing less from us than the consecration of our lives to Him, who loved us and gave Himself for us... Not only should there be a response on our side, but the glad acknowledgment of the claim that God makes on His side.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

The three marks also set a limit on thought, action and walk.

No thought is to go into our mind, we are to do nothing with our hand, and there is to be nothing in our walk, unfit for the blood of Christ.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Oil follows blood, never the reverse

Later in the ceremony the priest puts oil on those same three spots, on top of the blood.

At the consecration of the priests, and at the restoration of the leper, the blood of sacrifice went on ear and hand and foot. It marked the whole man as redeemed. After the blood came the oil, a picture of the Spirit. With the leper in particular, we are told that the oil went on ear and hand and foot, on top of the blood. So the Spirit of God seals us because of the blood, the work of Christ. It is not a matter of personal worthiness or of personal faithfulness, but of the value of the work of Christ.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Healed, then claimed. The man is already well before verse 14 begins; the blood does not cure him, it marks out who he now belongs to.

- Guilt met. The blood comes from a guilt (trespass) offering, because a holy relationship had been violated and had to be met.

- Whole man covered. Ear, hand and foot stand for what a person hears, what he does and where he goes — his whole responsibility.

- Hearing leads. The ear is touched first: you cannot do God's will until you know it, so listening comes before service and walk.

- Blood before oil. The anointing lands on the same three spots, but always on top of the blood — the Spirit's seal rests on the value of the sacrifice, not on the man's worthiness.

Leviticus 14:15 · Darby

And the priest shall take of the log of oil, and pour it into his, the priest's, left hand;

The blood of the trespass offering is already on the healed man's ear, hand and foot. Now the priest pours the log of oil into his own palm — so why must the oil pass through his hand, and go before the Lord, before it ever reaches the man?

The order: water, then blood, then oil

Writers read the fixed order of this ritual as a picture of how God works in a person.

As when the leper was cleansed and purified under the law, he was first washed with water, then sprinkled with blood, then anointed with oil (Lev. 14:8-9, and 14-18). This is a clear picture of our purification by the word of God when we are converted and born again. Then comes the sprinkling of the blood of Christ, and last the anointing of the Holy Spirit, which seals us for the day of final redemption.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Before God, before the man

The priest holds the oil in his left hand, dips his right finger, and sprinkles it seven times toward God.

Now the priest turns away from the leper. For the moment the leper is forgotten, and the oil is "sprinkled before the Lord."... I think this tells us of the perfect delight that God has in His Holy Spirit. Sometimes we forget that the Holy Spirit is the third Person of the Godhead. He is not merely an "influence," but the true and living God.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Why seven times?

Seven speaks of perfection. Look around this world, with all its sorrow and sin and suffering. How wonderful to remember that, in spite of it all, One dwells down here now who is altogether well pleasing to God in heaven... Although He dwells in every believer, and is their strength and power for all things of God, yet we need to remember that first of all He is down here for God, and for His glory.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Oil where the blood had been

The priest then puts the oil on the same three places already marked by the blood of the trespass offering.

Then follows the anointing from the Holy One (15-18). The waving of everything too was before Jehovah, and so was the application, as with the priestly consecration. The oil was put where the blood had been. How clearly this pictured the full blessing first enjoyed at Pentecost. Christ's death did more than remove evil. In the Holy Spirit's power we enter into all its fullness before God, so that we know and enjoy it for ourselves: we have redemption in Christ through His blood, and priestly access to the sanctuary as well... how much we owe to the Spirit, sent in Person to live in us and with us!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

More than cleansing

If the blood dealt with what the ear, hand and foot had done, the oil sets those same members to new use.

So not only are our members cleansed by the blood of Christ, but also consecrated to God, in the power of the Spirit. God's work is not only negative, but positive. The ear is no longer to be the channel for passing on defilement, but to be "swift to hear" the voice of the Good Shepherd. The hand is no longer to serve unrighteousness, but to reach out in acts of righteousness, grace, and true holiness. The foot is no longer to walk in foolish paths, but to run in the way of God's holy commandments. And finally, the whole man is to be dedicated to God in the power of the Holy Spirit.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Oil on blood: an anointing that stays

This order of blood first, then oil, is not unique to the leper.

In the consecration of Aaron and his sons the oil was put on the blood. The oil pictures the Holy Spirit; the blood pictures the atoning sacrifice of Christ, applied in all its blessed power. This is why the Spirit is never taken away. He is given to live in us on the righteous ground of the finished atoning work of our Lord on the cross.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Order. Water, then blood, then oil. Washing comes first, then forgiveness, then the anointing of the Spirit — never the other way round.

- Godward. The priest sprinkles the oil seven times before the Lord before a drop reaches the man. The Spirit is here first of all for God and for His glory.

- Upon. The oil goes exactly where the blood already was. The Spirit comes on the ground of Christ's work, not alongside it.

- Onward. What the blood forgave in ear, hand and foot, the oil now empowers — hearing, doing and walking turned to God's use.

- Abiding. Because the oil rests on the blood, the indwelling rests on a finished work, and so it is never withdrawn.

Leviticus 14:16 · Darby

and the priest shall dip his right finger in the oil that is in his left hand, and shall sprinkle of the oil with his finger seven times before Jehovah.

The man being cleansed is standing right there. Yet the first seven sprinklings of oil never touch him — they go toward God, and that raises the question of who this oil is for.

Where the Sprinkling Happened

The verse counts the sprinklings but never says where the priest stood. One writer offers two possible spots:

Then the priest was to sprinkle the oil seven times before the Lord — perhaps at the altar of burnt offering, or possibly at the door of the tabernacle.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The Man Is Set Aside for a Moment

Up to now the ceremony has been about the healed man. At this moment the priest turns away from him:

We have seen that the oil speaks of the Holy Spirit. Now the priest turns away from the leper. For the moment the man is forgotten, and the oil is "sprinkled before the Lord." As we have seen, the leper himself was presented before the Lord, in the power of the Holy Spirit and on the basis of the sacrifice of Christ. But now the oil is sprinkled before the Lord. I think this tells us of the perfect delight that God has in His Holy Spirit. Sometimes we forget that the Holy Spirit is the third Person of the Godhead. He is not merely an "influence." He is the true and living God.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Seven Times

The same writer reads the number seven, and then looks at the world we live in now:

Seven speaks of perfection. How wonderful it is to remember, when we look around this world with all its sorrow and sin and suffering, that despite all of it there is One who lives down here now who is altogether well-pleasing to God in heaven. You remember how God the Father delighted to look down from the open heavens when His Son lived on this earth, and to say of Him, and of Him alone, "You are My beloved Son; with You I am well pleased." In the same way God can look down now upon the Holy Spirit, and to all eternity He will be His delight in heaven. He dwells in every believer, and He is their strength and power for all the things of God. Yet we need to remember that first of all He is down here for God, and for His glory.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

More Than a Man Set Apart

One writer contrasts this anointing with the mere setting apart of a man for a job:

Then the anointing takes place, and the power and action of the Spirit of God is at work in the man's consecration. But note first that this action happens before the Lord, in His presence. It is not, so to speak, a prophetic action, coming out from Him with a partial revelation, a light shining in a dark place. It is the full, present anointing and action of the Spirit of God before God Himself. The oil was sprinkled seven times before the Lord, not merely a person set apart in holiness for a task, but the Holy Spirit (the Comforter) present, and present in His fullness, and acting towards the Lord. We are no more to grieve the Spirit of God than we are to allow or do anything inconsistent with Christ's blood. His holy understanding of God is to govern our thoughts and acts and ways.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the Anointing Pointed Forward To

The verses that follow put this same oil on the man himself. One writer sees the whole sequence as a picture of Pentecost drawn in advance:

Then follows the anointing from the Holy One (15-18). The waving of it all was done before the Lord, and so was the application, just as at the consecration of the priests. The oil was put where the blood had been. How clearly this pictured in advance the full blessing first enjoyed at Pentecost. Christ's death was not only for the removal of evil. It was entered into in all its fullness before God, and in the power of the Holy Spirit, so that a believer personally knows and enjoys it all — having redemption in Christ through His blood, and priestly access to the sanctuary as well.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- God first. Before any oil touches the healed man, the priest turns away from him and sprinkles it seven times "before the Lord."

- A Person, not a force. Writers read the oil as the Holy Spirit, and this Godward sprinkling as God's delight in Him. He is "not merely an 'influence'" but "the true and living God."

- Full, not partial. Seven speaks of perfection. The sprinkling shows the Spirit "present in His fullness, and acting towards the Lord," not a partial light in a dark place.

- For His glory before ours. He dwells in every believer as their strength, yet "first of all He is down here for God, and for His glory."

- Then the man. Only after this does the oil go where the blood had gone. That pattern, one writer says, "pictured in advance the full blessing first enjoyed at Pentecost."

Leviticus 14:17 · Darby

And of the rest of the oil that is in his hand shall the priest put on the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and on the thumb of his right hand, and on the great toe of his right foot, upon the blood of the trespass-offering.

The priest has already put the blood of the guilt offering on the healed leper's right ear, thumb, and big toe. Now he adds oil to those same three spots, on top of the blood: first a sacrifice, then the Spirit, then a whole life claimed for God.

Oil Upon Blood

The oil never touches bare skin. It goes only where the blood already is, and that order never changes.

You must get blood before you get oil, and the oil may come immediately after the blood, as in the case of the leper. When I am cleansed by the blood of Christ, then the Holy Spirit can come and dwell in me.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Blood Beneath the Oil

The verse names whose blood the oil goes on: "the blood of the guilt offering." Older translations call it the trespass offering. One writer compares that sacrifice with the one used to consecrate priests. They are not the same.

The blood put on the leper's ear, thumb and big toe was the blood of a trespass offering, because what is pictured there is the cleansing of a sinner. But it was the blood of a communion offering that consecrated priests for the service of God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Ear, Hand, and Foot

The priest marks three body parts: the ear, the hand, and the foot. A person listens, acts, and walks with these. Each one now gets a new purpose.

Not only are our members cleansed by the blood of Christ, but also consecrated to God, in the power of the Spirit. God's work is not only negative, but positive. The ear is no longer to be the way defilement gets in, but to be "swift to hear" the voice of the Good Shepherd. The hand is no longer to serve as the instrument of unrighteousness. It is now to be stretched out in acts of righteousness, grace, and true holiness. The foot is no longer to walk in folly's paths, but to run in the way of God's holy commandments. And, finally, the whole person is to be dedicated to God in the energy of the Holy Spirit.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The ear comes first in the list. That has a practical edge for anyone God has cleansed:

Those who are saved by grace and sealed by the Spirit are warned again and again about what they allow into their ears. … The precious blood claims the ear. The Spirit pictured by the oil is the power God gives, so that the ear may be used in a way that pleases Him.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Not an Upgrade to the Natural Man

The oil rests on blood, never on bare flesh. So the anointing is not an improvement of the man as he was.

Note well that the blood was first placed on the leper's ear and hand and foot, and afterwards the oil (Lev. 14:17). The Spirit's power is not something added to what I am as a mere natural man. The work of Christ must be grasped, its results formed in the soul.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

Oil That Does Not Run Out

The verse speaks of "the oil that remains in his hand." The priest has already sprinkled oil seven times before the LORD, and there is still more. The next verse pours the rest on the man's head.

It is lovely to see the way that oil never fails. The priest sprinkles it before the Lord seven times, and puts it on the ear, thumb and toe of the leper, and there is still more left. It reminds us of the word, "God gives the Spirit without measure" (John 3:34). Whatever need we have for His power and energy, we may be sure that the Spirit of God is more than enough for our every need. … Those in Israel who were anointed were the priests, the kings, and, in one case at least, a prophet — and the cleansed lepers! What a wonderful company he is brought into.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Order — Blood first, then oil. The Spirit comes after the sacrifice, never before it.

- Ground — The oil rests on the blood of the guilt offering. That sacrifice cleansed a defiled sinner; a different one consecrated priests.

- Reach — Ear, hand, foot: hearing, acting, walking. The cleansing is not abstract; it lands on the exact parts of life a person uses.

- Power — The anointing is not added strength for the natural man. It is God's own power making real what the blood has already secured.

- Overflow — The oil never runs out. The priest pours the rest on the man's head. That marks his whole person, and sets a former outcast among the anointed of Israel.

Leviticus 14:18 · Darby

And the remainder of the oil that is in the priest's hand he shall put upon the head of him that is to be cleansed, and the priest shall make atonement for him before Jehovah.

A healed leper comes back on the eighth day, and the priest empties his hand: the last of the oil goes on the man's head. The questions are why any oil is left, why it goes there, and why a rite so full of oil ends with the word "atonement."

Oil that Runs Out Over

One writer sees the oil left over as a supply that never runs out, and notices who else in Israel ever had oil poured on the head:

It is lovely to see the way the oil never fails. Although it was sprinkled before the Lord seven times, and put on the ear, thumb and toe of the leper, there is still more left. It reminds us of the word, "God gives the Spirit without measure" (John 3:34). Whatever need we have for His power and energy, we may be sure that the Spirit of God is more than enough for our every need. … Those in Israel who were anointed were the priests, the kings, and, in one case at least, a prophet — and the cleansed lepers!

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Why the Head

Ear, hand and foot were each touched on their own. Commentators read the head in two ways. One links each place the oil touches to a power the Spirit gives:

The oil is a picture of the Holy Spirit. He is the power by which the ear takes in the truth. He is the power that puts a person's actions right and corrects the walk. Put on the head, it shows the mind coming under the power of the Spirit.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Another notes that the oil went only where the blood had already gone:

These parts of the body were already marked with blood. So the oil was put on the blood… The rest of the oil was poured on the head of the cleansed leper, a picture of the whole man being claimed for God.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Oil Without Blood

The head is the one place blood never touched. One writer takes that omission as a picture of Christ Himself.

No blood is put upon the head itself, but the remainder of the oil is poured on it. "The head of every man is Christ," and when Christ personally is pictured, He is anointed without blood, for He was personally sinless and needed no expiation. So when the high priest is consecrated on his own (Lev. 8:6-12), he is bathed and then the oil is put on him straight away. It is the same as when our Lord was baptised in the Jordan. He was "anointed by the Holy Spirit" when the divine Spirit came down on Him at once in the form of a dove. Had it been anyone else, atonement would have been required before the anointing could take place.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Outcast and the High Priest

One writer sets this moment beside the day the high priest himself was anointed.

Here the high priest himself could say: "After Moses sprinkled the anointing oil seven times on the altar and its vessels, he poured it on my head" (Lev. 8). How remarkable the likeness here. The leper who had been shut out and the high priest both had oil poured on their heads at the door of the tent of meeting. Under the ceremonial law, only these two had the oil poured on the head… The astonishing ordeal the healed leper went through certainly pictured the amazing place the believer is now brought into, through and in Christ.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What the Anointing Is Not

The verse ends with atonement. One writer asks what actually made that atonement:

It was not, I think, the oil that made the atonement, but the blood of the trespass offering. In Leviticus 17:11 we read, "it is the blood that makes atonement by the life." Blood, not oil, makes atonement. Blood alone can cover sins. But this statement comes at the end of verse 18. It closes the section that includes both the trespass offering and the oil. So it shows us how closely the Spirit of God is connected with the offering of our Lord Jesus Christ (Heb. 9:14).

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Received Personally

The rite echoes the consecration of priests, yet its starting point is not the same.

In the case of the leper, it is different from the consecration of the priests. This is not consecration to God first of all… The first thought is cleansing — consecration from defilement. Yet we do reach up to the anointing oil, and here it is poured on the head of the cleansed one. He is seen on his own as one who shares in the Holy Spirit before God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood first. The atonement named at the end of the verse rests on the trespass offering, not on the oil; blood alone covers sin.

- Oil after. Where the blood had gone, the oil followed — the Spirit's power for the ear that hears, the hand that serves, the foot that walks.

- Oil over. There is always a remainder, because the Spirit is not given by measure.

- Oil on the head. The head takes oil and no blood; commentators read it as the mind brought under the Spirit, or the whole man claimed for God.

- Oil that lifts. Only two men in Israel had oil poured on the head: the high priest and the cleansed outcast. The man shut out ends the day where the highest in Israel stood.

Leviticus 14:19 · Darby

And the priest shall offer the sin-offering, and make atonement for him that is to be cleansed from his uncleanness; and afterwards shall he slaughter the burnt-offering.

This verse falls on the eighth day of the leper's restoration. The priest has already put blood and oil on the man's ear, hand and foot. Two more sacrifices still follow: a sin offering and a burnt offering. If the man is healed and already marked with blood, what is left to do?

Healed Is Not the Same as Cleansed

The man in this chapter is already healed. That alone does not settle matters with God.

The healing and the purification are different things. Healing does not by itself make a man cleansed for God. No work in the soul, however necessary, can truly restore him. For that, God's grace in Christ must come in.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Why a Sin Offering Follows the Trespass Offering

The order of the sacrifices is not accidental. The trespass offering came first (verse 12). Only now comes the sin offering. One deals with what we have done. The other deals with where it came from.

"The priest shall offer the sin offering, to make atonement for him who is to be cleansed from his uncleanness." Here we have a picture of Christ. He is not only the bearer of our trespasses, but also the One who made an end of sin, root and branch... As the trespass offering, Christ put away all my trespasses. As the sin offering, He met the great root from which those trespasses came. He met all; but it is as the trespass offering that I first know Him, because that is how I first need Him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

So the cross dealt with more than a list of wrongs.

Not only are all the trespasses blotted out by the blood of the trespass offering, but even that old incurable root of sin was judged. The sin offering told out that nothing but death could deliver us from this. That old nature is not forgiven, it is judged.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

The Burnt Offering Moves in the Opposite Direction

The word "afterward" in the verse fixes the order: the sin offering first, then the burnt offering. The same act of laying hands on the animal now means something different. This time the exchange runs the other way.

In the trespass offering, the offerer put his hand on the head of the offering. All his sins and trespasses passed over from him to it, and he was left clear and free from guilt. In the burnt offering, the offerer again put his hand on the head of the offering. But now all the power and worth of the offering passes over to the offerer. The burnt offering is especially God's part in that mighty offering at the cross. The man did not bring the burnt offering because he had sinned. He brought it as the highest mark of worship that man could offer to God.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Oil Does Not Replace Blood

Verse 18 has just described the oil poured on the man's head. That could look like the high point. This verse does not stop there.

Verse 18 gives a powerful picture, crowning the details before it. Yet the Spirit's power is set out there in full. See how carefully God marks, after it, in verse 19, the sin offering offered, as well as the burnt offering and the meal offering that went with it. Each one was needed to make atonement for the man who was to be cleansed from his uncleanness. All were offered so that he should be clean, and know it with the utmost assurance. For atoning virtue Christ is everything; yet the Spirit has His own blessed function.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Washing Was Not Enough

The man had already washed and shaved off all his hair. None of that gave him the right to draw near to God.

Suppose he had come there on the strength of having washed his body and shaved off all his hair. Would God have received him? Certainly not. Unless he had washed and shaved, drawing near would have been presumption. But without the sacrifices as well, he had no right to approach. And even with these, he needed the priest to present him before the Lord... He learned that there was a way back into God's presence, but death alone could open it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Healed — the disease stopping is not the same as being clean before God; only grace in Christ restores.

- Trespasses — the trespass offering came first, because we first meet Christ as the One who puts away what we have done.

- Root — the sin offering of verse 19 goes deeper, to the nature that produced those acts; it is not forgiven, it is judged.

- Acceptance — the burnt offering reverses the flow. The worth of the offering now passes to the man, and worship rises to God.

- Assurance — the oil of verse 18 does not replace atonement. God adds these sacrifices so the cleansed man is clean and knows it.

Leviticus 14:20 · Darby

And the priest shall offer the burnt-offering and the oblation upon the altar; and the priest shall make atonement for him, and he shall be clean.

This verse ends the ritual for a man healed of leprosy — a disease that had shut him out from everyone. Why does he still need atonement after the washing and the shaving, and what do the last two offerings add?

Four offerings, one Christ

One writer sets the grain offering beside the burnt offering, and then names all four sacrifices this cleansing used:

The grain offering pictures "the man Christ Jesus" in His perfect human life. In the case of the cleansed leper it stands closely joined with the burnt offering. So it is in the experience of every saved sinner. We first know that our trespasses are forgiven, and the root or principle of sin judged. Only then can we enjoy communion with God about that blessed One, in our measure and by the power of the Spirit. He lived a perfect human life down here, and then offered Himself without spot to God on the cross. So the four classes of offerings are set before us in their divine order in the cleansing of the leper: the trespass offering, the sin offering, the burnt offering, and the grain offering. Each one shows its own aspect of our blessed Lord Jesus Christ.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Clean, and sure of it

One commentator weighs the Spirit's place beside the offerings that make atonement:

The Spirit's power is set out here in full. Yet see how carefully God marks, right after this in v. 19, the sin offering, the burnt offering, and the grain offering that goes with it. Each one was needed to make atonement for the man who was to be cleansed from his uncleanness. All of them were offered so that he should be clean, and know it with the utmost assurance. For atoning power Christ is the all; yet the Spirit has His own blessed work.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "atonement" covers

Another writer takes the word "atonement" at its root, and draws out what this threefold covering secures — and what it rules out:

Atonement means "covering." He is covered by the blood of the trespass offering, covered by the blood of the sin offering, and covered by the blood of the burnt offering. No fault or flaw or spot or stain can ever be found in that man, so recently an outcast leper, unfit for the company of even his fellow-men. More than that, God sees him in all the excellencies, beauty and righteousness of the One those lambs represented… It was not the washing and not the shaving that fitted him for that wonderful Presence, though those were right and needful, but the blood, and the blood alone.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The offering that answers no sin

The same writer shows which way the benefit flows in this offering, and why the man brought it:

In the burnt offering, the offerer again put his hand on the head of the offering. But now all the efficacy and virtue of the offering passes over to the offerer. The burnt offering is especially God's part in that mighty offering at the cross. The man did not bring the burnt offering because he had sinned. He brought it as the highest mark of worship that man could offer to God.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Who the leper pictures

Commentators differ here. One reads the ritual as a picture of a sinner brought to God for the first time: "It pictures a sinner cleansed from an impurity that would otherwise be fatal, rather than a believer tripped up along the way" (William Kelly). Another reads the closing words as a recovery:

Priestly service goes on at the altar, and a pleasing aroma (the acceptability of the sacrifice of Christ) is delighting the heart of God. All the while the recovered and cleansed leper stands before God with heart and conscience fully purged. He is there to know the blessedness of his portion in communion with God. How much is implied in the words, "And he shall be clean!"

Modernised from C CrainOriginal wording

Where grace leaves him

One writer insists this is not just a return to where the man was before:

God visited the leper where he was; but He did not leave him there. He went out ready to do a work. On the strength of that work He could bring the leper into a higher place, and higher communion, than he had ever known before… If any case could fully test and settle the question of human effort, human merit, and human righteousness, the leper is, beyond question, that case.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Covered — atonement means covering. Three offerings cover the man, so God now sees him in the excellencies of the One the lambs pictured.

- Cleansed — the blood alone fits him for God's presence. The washing and the shaving were right and needful, but they could not do it.

- Certain — God marks every offering, so the man is clean and knows it with the utmost assurance.

- Communion — his trespasses are forgiven and the root of sin judged. Now he can enjoy communion with God about the One who lived a perfect life and offered Himself without spot.

- Consecrated — the last offering answers no sin at all. It is the highest mark of worship man can bring. It leaves the outcast higher than he had ever stood before.

Leviticus 14:21 · Darby

But if he be poor, and his hand be not able to get it, then he shall take one lamb for a trespass-offering, for a wave-offering, to make atonement for him; and one tenth part of fine flour mingled with oil for an oblation; and a log of oil,

Restoring a healed leper was expensive. Leviticus 14 asks for two male lambs, a ewe lamb, three tenths of an ephah of fine flour, and a log of oil. Verse 21 turns to the man who cannot afford it. How much will God lower the cost — and how much will He not?

Grace measured to ability

One writer sees in this provision how God deals with people everywhere:

When a man was to be cleansed and brought back to the privileges of the camp of Israel, God was so considerate of his circumstances that He made a special provision for one who was poor. This principle runs all through Scripture. God looks for, and accepts from us, only according to our ability: "it is acceptable according to what a person has, not according to what he does not have."

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Same foundation for rich and poor

The earlier stages — the two birds, the washing, the shaving — never changed with a man's means:

At his first appearance before the priest the leper has nothing to provide, whether he is poor or rich. The two birds picture the foundation truth: we are justified from all things by Him who was delivered for our offences and raised again for our justification. The leper does not provide them; he simply looks on. He stands still and sees the salvation of God. The priest orders the birds to be taken for him. Nor is there any change for the poorest in Israel as to washing himself, washing his clothes, or cutting off his hair... The difference begins only on the eighth day, the start of a new period. Even then every returning leper, however poor, must provide one lamb for a trespass offering. For rich and poor alike, this lamb was to be waved alive before the Lord. That was the only time in Israel an offering was waved alive. It showed that the man who had lost all his privileges by uncleanness confessed and acknowledged his trespass, and saw it all put away by the death and blood-shedding of the spotless lamb.

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

What poverty may not reduce

What drops is the cost, not the list. The poor man still brought all four offerings:

God met the person according to his ability, though he could not do without even one of the offerings. Nothing less than the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ can enable God righteously to restore a soul to communion with Himself, and put the person back in his place among God's saints. A trespass offering, a sin offering, a burnt offering, a grain offering — the poorest had to bring each one, just as the richest Israelite did. But the man's inability to afford the more costly ones was not to stand in the way of his coming with what he could get.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The one lamb that remains is the guilt offering — the trespass offering in older wording. One writer shows why it could not shrink:

In the provision for poverty that follows, the trespass offering keeps its full character. Consecration to the Lord must not be lessened. The ear, the hand, and the foot must be as fully His whether we have little or much with which to serve Him.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Acceptance and enjoyment

Poverty here is not only about money. Commentators read it as a picture of how little we grasp:

The allowance of grace here is only for falling short on the eighth day; and this is where poverty is found now, and long has been. Few rise up to the riches of God's grace in its Christian form and fulness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That shortfall touches what we enjoy, not where we stand:

The sacrifices of "the eighth day" are connected with the soul's communion. So the measure of what the soul takes in affects them. But whatever that measure may be, the grace of God can meet it with those deeply touching words, "such as he is able to get." More than that, the two turtledoves gave the poor the same privileges the two lambs gave the rich. Both alike pointed to "the precious blood of Christ," which has infinite, unchanging, and eternal power in the judgement of God. All stand before God on the ground of death and resurrection. All come into the same place of nearness; but all do not enjoy the same measure of communion.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The ESV puts that phrase as what a man "can afford."

Valued by God's estimate

A cheaper offering might seem to buy a lesser welcome. But the valuation is not ours to make:

How often we are "poor"! Our grasp of Christ is often so poor! Yet if we do trust in His precious blood, we have pardon and cleansing. Thank God, it is not my estimate of His worth that matters, but God's. Instead of the lambs for the sin offering and burnt offering, I can perhaps only afford pigeons. But my acceptance and my cleansing are not affected by that... Keenly as we may feel our poverty, never let it keep us away from God.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Poverty acknowledged. God provides for the man who cannot afford the full offering. He accepts what a person has.

- Foundation untouched. The birds, the washing, and the shaving are the same for rich and poor. At that stage the man brings nothing; he stands still and looks on.

- List unchanged. The poor man still brings all four offerings: trespass, sin, burnt, and grain. The cost drops; the requirement does not.

- Consecration unchanged. Ear, hand, and foot must be as fully His as ever: having little to serve with never means belonging to God less.

- Valuation unchanged. Doves buy the same standing as lambs, because the worth counted is God's estimate of Christ, not ours.

Leviticus 14:22 · Darby

and two turtle-doves, or two young pigeons, as his hand may be able to get the one shall be a sin-offering, and the other a burnt-offering.

God made a way back for the healed leper, but the full ritual called for three lambs — more than some could ever afford. This verse lists the cheaper offering. Does it buy a lesser cleansing?

"Whichever he can afford"

The verse measures the offering by the man's means. One writer follows that rule far beyond this chapter.

In restoring the man to cleanness and to the privileges of the camp of Israel, God was so considerate of his circumstances that He made a special provision for one who was poor. This principle runs through all of Scripture. God looks for and accepts from us only according to our ability: "It is accepted according to what a man has, and not according to what he does not have."

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Grace does not wait for the man to climb to the offering; it lowers the offering to the man.

Grace meets the needy one just where he is, and as he is. The atoning blood comes within reach of the very lowest, the very poorest, the very feeblest. All who need it can have it. "If he is poor" — what then? Let him be cast aside? Ah no; Israel's God could never deal that way with the poor and needy. There is ample provision for all such in the gracious words, "Such as he can get; even such as he is able to get." Most exquisite grace!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Poor in pocket, poor in grasp

The shortfall falls on the two offerings this verse names. One writer sees in it a picture of the offerer's own small understanding.

The ritual was the same as in the first case, but the birds took the place of lambs in the sin offering and the burnt offering. This pictures a poverty of understanding about the sin offering and the burnt offering. Many are too poor spiritually to see how sin is dealt with and condemned in the sacrifice of Christ. They have only a small understanding of that sacrifice being above all for the glory of God (the burnt offering). How good it is then to see God's gracious care for the weak.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A bird's blood, a bullock's worth

So what carried the cleansing?

Now, the grasp may be feeble, the faith may be wavering, the experience may be shallow. But let the reader remember, for his soul's joy and comfort, that what matters is not the depth of his experience, the stability of his faith, or the strength of his grasp. It is the divine value, the unchanging power of the blood of Jesus. This gives great rest to the heart. The tender thoughtfulness of our ever gracious God shows in this: the blood of a turtledove was as effective for the poor as the blood of a bullock for the rich.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Even at this lowest level, the creature chosen still says something true about the Saviour.

One who was unable to bring a lamb would be allowed to bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons as a sacrifice. This pictures one who is poor in his grasp of the value of the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus as fully atoning for sin. At least he recognises that the Lord Jesus is from heaven (pictured by the birds), therefore above him, and though his understanding is weak, God receives his offering.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Nothing else was reduced

The substitution touches only the last two animals. Everything the priest did with blood and oil went on in full.

Then and not till then, for poor as for rich, comes the anointing from the Holy One. The oil follows the blood. The priest sprinkles this oil in full before Jehovah, then puts it on each part of the poor leper and pours the rest on his head. He did everything as carefully for him as for the richest. But two turtledoves, or two young pigeons, such as he could get, were enough, one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Grace lowered the cost; it did not empty the list.

Notice that there is no difference at all in the earlier part of the process of restoration. At his first appearance before the priest, the leper has nothing to provide, whether he is poor or rich... he simply looks on. He stands still and sees the salvation of God. The priest commands that the birds be taken for him... This difference only begins on the eighth day, and even then every returning leper, however poor, must provide one lamb for a trespass offering.

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Do not let poverty keep you away

The verse's comfort is meant to be used, not admired.

How often we are "poor"! Our grasp of Christ is often so poor! But still, if we do trust in His precious blood, we have pardon and cleansing. Thank God, it is not my estimate of His worth but God's estimate that matters... Our faith may be terribly small, our appreciation of His worth almost nothing. But if we come in that name, the One to whom we come knows His true worth and value, and we are accepted in Him. However keenly we feel our poverty, never let that keep us away from God.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Poverty named. God Himself writes the poor man's case into the law: He accepts what a man has, not what he does not have.

- Poverty pictured. Birds in place of lambs picture a small grasp of the sin offering and the burnt offering — how God judged sin, and how the sacrifice glorified Him.

- Poverty priced. A turtledove's blood cleansed the poor as fully as a bullock's blood cleansed the rich. The value rests on God's estimate of the sacrifice, not the offerer's.

- Poverty unhindered. One lamb was still required of every leper, rich or poor, and the priest did every step as carefully for the poor man as for the richest.

- Poverty welcomed. Never let a sense of poverty keep you from God. Come in that name, and you are accepted in Him.

Leviticus 14:23 · Darby

And he shall bring them on the eighth day of his cleansing unto the priest, unto the entrance of the tent of meeting, before Jehovah.

Leviticus 14:23 closes the instructions for a healed leper who could not afford the full set of offerings. Two questions drive the passage: why is there a second stage at all, when the man has already been declared clean, and what happens when a worshipper cannot bring what a rich man brings?

Why an Eighth Day at All

The chapter divides the leper's recovery into two acts. This verse belongs to the second.

This work of restoration has two distinct parts, and we must not confuse them. First comes the restoration to a place among the people of God, from whom he had been separated. That happens on the first day, when he returns to the camp. Second, on the eighth day, there is a new and only now complete cleansing. By it he is brought fully to God, and restored to his tent as well. In the first part, the man who has been in living death is restored, as it were, to life. In the second part, he is brought back into communion with God, and so with His people.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

That eighth day did not repeat the first. It began a new life for the man.

And that eighth day really was a new beginning for that poor leper. The days of wandering alone outside the camp are gone forever. No longer away from home and loved ones — a life of love, joy, peace and worship has begun. Because of the offerings he brings, the man once so far off comes so near, so very near to God. I do not recall any other Israelite, apart from the priests and Levites, who came so near the Lord. No one else had this wonderful privilege of being presented before the Lord in this way.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Nothing but Sacrifice Opens the Door

The verse sends him to the entrance of the tent of meeting, and not empty-handed.

On the eighth day the former leper took his place at the door of the tent of meeting, but only with the appointed sacrifices. Without them he had no business there. On the ground of sacrifice, and on that alone, could he stand again where the people gathered to meet with God. Had he dared to come there on the ground of having washed his flesh and shaved off all his hair, would he have been received? Certainly not... and even with the sacrifices, he still needed the priest to present him before the Lord. Now, rightly presented, he learned that there was a way back into God's presence, but death alone could open it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

When the Worshipper Is Poor

The verse allows for a man who cannot bring the full set of offerings.

Grace meets the needy one just where he is, and as he is. The atoning blood is brought within reach of the very lowest, the very poorest, the very feeblest. All who need it can have it. "If he is poor" — what then? Is he to be cast aside? No; Israel's God could never deal with the poor and needy like that. There is ample provision for all such in the gracious words, "such as he can get; even such as he is able to get."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where the Allowance Begins — and Where It Stops

The concession is narrower than it first appears.

There is no difference at all in the earlier part of the restoration. At his first appearance before the priest, the leper has nothing to provide, whether he is poor or rich... Nor is there any change for the poorest in Israel as to cleansing himself, washing his clothes, or cutting off his hair... The difference begins only on the eighth day, the start of a new period. Even then, every returning leper must provide one lamb for a trespass offering, however poor he is.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

The priest did not cut the poor man's ceremony short.

After the blood of the trespass offering, and not before, comes the anointing from the Holy One, for poor as for rich. For the priest did everything as carefully for him as for the richest. But two turtledoves, or two young pigeons, such as he could get, were enough, one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Whose Valuation Counts

Commentators apply this poverty to the believer.

How often we are "poor"! Our grasp of Christ is often so poor! But if we do trust in His precious blood, we have pardon and cleansing. Thank God, it is not my estimate of His worth, but God's estimate, that matters... Keenly as we may feel our poverty, never let that keep us away from God.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Poor in means. The shortfall is not in the man's need but in what he can bring. Writers see here a believer whose grasp of Christ is small, though the cleansing is not.

- Poor, yet required. The concession starts only on the eighth day. Every returning leper must still bring one lamb for a trespass offering, however poor.

- Poor, yet presented. Washing and shaving could not get him to the door. Only sacrifice opened the way, and only the priest could present him.

- Poor, yet anointed in full. Blood and oil went on the poor man exactly as on the richest. The priest cut nothing short for him.

- Poor, yet accepted. God's estimate of the offering decides his acceptance, not his own. So poverty is never a reason to stay away.

Leviticus 14:24 · Darby

And the priest shall take the he-lamb of the trespass-offering, and the log of oil, and the priest shall wave them as a wave-offering before Jehovah.

This verse repeats the ceremony of verse 12 almost word for word. But now the man cannot afford the full set of offerings. Is a cheaper cleansing a lesser cleansing?

Where poverty makes no difference at all

The concession only appears on the eighth day. Before that, every Israelite went through the same steps, rich or poor.

There is no difference at all in the earlier part of the process of restoration. At his first appearance before the priest the leper has nothing to provide, whether he is poor or rich. He does not bring the two birds; he simply looks on. He stands still, and sees the salvation of God. There is no change for the poorest in Israel either, as to washing himself, washing his clothes, or cutting off his hair… The difference only begins on the eighth day, which starts a new period. Even then, every returning leper, however poor, must provide one lamb for a trespass offering.

after_note: DELETE

H. H. Snell

The one thing that could not be reduced

Three lambs could become one. Three measures of flour could become one. But the lamb for the trespass offering and the log of oil did not change.

The allowance of grace here is only for falling short on the eighth day… But the principle must be kept even if the right measure is lacking. The full offering was two male lambs without blemish, one female lamb like them, three measures of fine flour with oil for the offering, and a log of oil besides. If the leper could not manage that, he was to take one lamb with one measure mixed with oil for the offering, and a log of oil. This was essential for rich and poor alike… The defilement must be felt and met in full.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A trespass, not only a stain

The first lamb to die answers for wrongdoing against God. Older translations call this the trespass offering.

The whole range of offerings comes in here. But the trespass offering is killed first, because the leper counts as an actual trespasser. This is true in every case. As those who have trespassed against God, we need Christ as the One who atoned on the cross for those trespasses. "He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree." The first view the sinner gets of Christ is as the fulfilment of the trespass offering.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The disease was uncleanness; but it was also a debt owed.

We see that leprosy was not only counted unclean, it was also counted an actual trespass against the Lord, calling for the trespass offering. So we need to realise that we are not only defiled by sin — we have each one personally "sinned against the Lord."

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Waved while still alive

Elsewhere the waving came after the animal was killed. Here the lamb is lifted before the Lord while it still lives, and the poor man's lamb is no exception.

In both cases this lamb was to be waved alive before the Lord. This was the only time in Israel that a lamb was waved alive. It showed that the man who had lost all his privileges through uncleanness was confessing and acknowledging his trespass. He saw it all put away by the death and shed blood of the spotless lamb.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

A log of oil that never runs short

The same log of oil has to serve the whole rite.

It is lovely to see the way that oil never fails. The priest sprinkles it before the Lord seven times, and puts it on the ear, thumb and toe of the leper. Even so, there is still more left. It reminds us that God "gives the Spirit without measure" (John 3:34)… The oil meets every requirement towards God and towards men in full. Even then there is still more, and it goes on the head of the man who is to be cleansed. Those in Israel who were anointed were the priests, the kings, and in at least one case a prophet — and the cleansed lepers!

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Nothing withheld from the poorest

The priest's hands moved no faster over the cheap offering than over the costly one.

There is judicial cleansing in the sprinkled blood of the trespass offering. This blood is the leper's consecration to God, suited to the new creation, and so it is applied to the renewed mind, to his work, and to his walk. Then, and not until then, for poor as for rich, comes the anointing from the Holy One… The priest sprinkles all of this oil before the Lord first. Only then does he put it on each part of the poor leper, and pour the rest on his head… His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Same: before the eighth day nothing differs. Every leper washes, shaves and cleanses alike. Poverty changes only what he carries in his hands.

- Required: the lamb of the trespass offering and the log of oil could not be scaled down. The defilement had to be met in full.

- Owed: leprosy was more than uncleanness. It counted as an actual trespass against the Lord, so the trespass offering dies first.

- Lifted: the lamb is waved alive before it dies. The man confesses his trespass and sees it put away by the spotless lamb.

- Poured: one log of oil covers the sprinkling, the ear, the hand and the foot, and still overflows onto his head. The poorest man leaves anointed like a priest or a king.

Leviticus 14:25 · Darby

And he shall slaughter the he-lamb of the trespass-offering; and the priest shall take of the blood of the trespass-offering, and put it upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and upon the thumb of his right hand, and on the great toe of his right foot.

This verse sits inside a short law for the leper who cannot afford the full set of offerings. What God lets him leave out, and what He will not let anyone leave out, is the whole point of it.

The lamb that could not be scaled down

God let the poor man bring less of almost everything. He allowed no change at all in the blood.

The poor leper might not be able to take two unblemished he-lambs and one ewe lamb like them, with three measures of fine flour, with oil for the grain offering, and a log of oil besides. In that case he was to take one lamb, with one measure of oil mixed in for the grain offering, and a log of oil. This was indispensable for rich or poor alike. The priest began with the lamb killed as a trespass offering. It was not simply a sin offering, and still less a ram of consecration with its sweet aroma. That was the blood sprinkled on each of those parts of his body, and nothing else and nothing less was allowed. The defilement had to be felt, and it had to be fully met.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why a guilt offering

The ESV calls it a guilt offering; older translations say "trespass offering." The leper was not the only person who needed one. A Nazirite was someone specially devoted to God.

A leper could not be cleansed without one (Lev. 14:10-14). A Nazirite who had defiled the head of his consecration could not renew that consecration either. First he had to bring a year-old he-lamb as a trespass offering to the Lord. (Num. 6:12.) In both these cases God's rights had really been infringed. The leper teaches us what God's professed people ought to be for God, but had not been.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Ear, thumb and toe

Why the ear, the thumb and the toe, and not some other spot?

In the cleansing of the leper, and in the consecration of the priest alike, the blood is put on three parts of the man: the tip of the right ear, the thumb of the right hand, and the great toe of the right foot. Together these three show what he is. By the ear he is to receive the word of God; with the hand, to do the work he is given; with the foot, to walk in His blessed ways. This is clearly the man in his whole responsibility.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Each of those three spots answers to a history of failure.

The blood of the trespass offering that has blotted out all our trespasses now marks the ear and thumb and toe of the cleansed leper. It is the badge, the mark, on everyone who enters those courts of glory. Not one of us can deny that his head, with all its intellect and ability, needed cleansing by that precious blood. He has used his hands many times to sin against the Lord. But now the blood on the right thumb is the sign that all has been forgiven. How often have our feet carried us astray, to go our own way (Isaiah 53:6). But now the blood on the right toe tells everyone that the Lord has laid on Him all their iniquity.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Blood first, then the oil

The order was fixed, and the priest kept it for the poor man too.

The sprinkled blood of the trespass offering brings judicial cleansing. That blood is the leper's consecration to God. It suits the new creation, and so it is applied to the renewed mind, and for work, and for walk. Then and not till then, for poor as for rich, comes the anointing from the Holy One... For the priest did everything as carefully for him as for the richest... His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Communion, not standing

A smaller offering marks a smaller measure of communion. It does not mark a smaller place before God.

Whatever that measure may be, the grace of God can meet it with those deeply touching words, "such as he is able to get." And more than that, the two turtledoves gave the poor the same privileges the two lambs gave the rich. Both alike pointed to "the precious blood of Christ," which is of infinite, unchanging, and eternal value in the judgement of God. All stand before God on the ground of death and resurrection. All are brought into the same place of nearness; but all do not enjoy the same measure of communion.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The concession exists so that cost never becomes the reason a restored person stays outside.

If he could not get all that was prescribed, God would receive smaller offerings for the grain, sin, and burnt offerings. No one should be kept outside because they did not have the means of being fully reinstated. Yet all had to bring the sacrifice appointed for the first day, and the lamb for the trespass offering. These could not be dispensed with, for all alike had to own by the type what the ground of standing is, and the need of a sacrifice for restoration.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Trespass — the blood comes from a guilt offering, because the man being restored had really trespassed against God's rights.

- Lamb — the rest of the offering could shrink, but the lamb could not. Nothing other or less was allowed, for rich or poor.

- Ear, hand, foot — blood on these three points claims the whole man: to hear God's word, do His work, walk His ways.

- Equal — the priest did as much for the poor man as for the richest. Poverty could not cut short his cleansing.

- Result — all come into the same nearness. What differs is not standing, but how much communion we enjoy.

Leviticus 14:26 · Darby

And the priest shall pour of the oil into [his], the priest's, left hand,

These instructions come from the last part of the leper's cleansing (vv. 21–32). There God makes a way for a man who cannot afford the full set of offerings. The striking thing is what changes and what does not: the lambs are reduced to birds, but the priest still pours the oil into his own palm exactly as before.

Grace measured to the man's ability

Verse 26 repeats for the poor man what the law already said for the rich one. The anointing comes at the same point, and it means the same thing.

Then and not till then, for poor as for rich, comes the anointing from the Holy One. The oil follows the blood, and it pictures divine power. It does not picture life only, nor redemption, or rather purification by blood, which dedicates a person to God. This oil is completely sprinkled before Jehovah first, before any of it is put on each part of the poor leper's body, and the rest is poured on his head. For the priest did all as carefully for him as for the richest. His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What poverty could not reduce

The concession has limits. God lowers the cost of the offerings. He does not shorten the list.

Each one had to bring a lamb for the trespass offering and a log of oil. But the grain offering was cut to one-tenth of an ephah, and birds could take the place of the animals for the sin offering and the burnt offering. So God met the person according to his ability. Yet he could not do without even one of the offerings. Nothing less than the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ can enable God to restore a soul to communion with Himself in righteousness, and to give the person back his place among God's saints.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Oil held in another man's hand

The leper never handles the oil himself. The priest pours it into his own palm and puts it where the blood already is.

Now we see the reason for the log of oil. The priest poured some of the oil into the palm of his hand. With it he anointed the tip of the leper's right ear, the thumb of his right hand, and the big toe of his right foot. These parts were already marked with blood. So the oil was put on the blood. The ear is what receives communications; the hand and foot carry them out. The oil is symbolic of the Holy Spirit. Only in the strength and power of God's Holy Spirit will the believer be able to respond in a way suitable to such divine love and grace. The rest of the oil was poured out on the head of the cleansed leper — a picture of the whole man being claimed for God.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Blood before oil

Blood went on the man's ear, thumb and toe first (v. 25). Only then comes the oil.

It is deeply interesting to see that the oil was put on the blood of the trespass offering. The blood of Christ is the divine basis of the operations of the Holy Spirit. The blood and the oil go together. As sinners we could know nothing of the oil apart from the blood. The oil could not have been put on the leper until the blood of the trespass offering had first been applied. "In him you also, when you heard the word of truth… and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Oil that does not run out

One log of oil has to cover every stage. The surprise is what is left at the end.

It is lovely to see the way that oil never fails. Although sprinkled before the Lord seven times, and put on the ear, thumb and toe of the leper, there is still more left. It reminds us of the word, "he gives the Spirit without measure" (John 3:34). Whatever need we have for His power and energy, we may be sure that the Spirit of God is more than enough for our every need. Every requirement of the oil towards God, and towards men, has been fully met. Still there is more, and this is poured on the head of the man who is to be cleansed. Those in Israel who were anointed were the priests, the kings, and, in one case at least, a prophet — and the cleansed lepers! What a wonderful company he is brought into!

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Poor. The man cannot afford the full offerings. God writes the alternative into the law instead of shutting him out.

- Same. Blood on ear, thumb and toe. Oil into the priest's palm, oil on the blood, the rest on the head. Poverty scales none of it down.

- Required. The value of the animals could shrink. Not one of the offerings could go, and the log of oil stayed full.

- Order. The oil always follows the blood, never comes before it. The sacrifice is the ground of the Spirit's work.

- Enough. One log covers the sprinkling before God and the anointing of the man, and still runs over onto his head — a Spirit given without measure.

Leviticus 14:27 · Darby

and the priest shall sprinkle with his right finger of the oil that is in his left hand seven times before Jehovah.

This verse sits inside a shorter version of the cleansing ceremony, written for a healed leper too poor to bring the full set of offerings. Birds take the place of the lambs. But the oil does not change, and neither does the sevenfold sprinkling of it before the LORD.

Where grace makes allowance

The allowance for poverty does not touch the early stages of the leper's restoration. One writer traces where the difference begins:

There is no difference at all in the earlier part of the restoration. At his first appearance before the priest, the leper has nothing to provide, whether he is poor or rich. The two birds picture the foundation truth of being justified from all things by Him who was delivered for our offences and raised again for our justification. The leper does not provide them; he only looks on... This difference only begins on the eighth day, the start of a new period. Even then, every returning leper must bring one lamb for a trespass offering, however poor he is.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

What poverty may not reduce

The poor man's list still includes the same measure of oil, and the priest handles it just as he would for a rich man. One commentator draws out why:

There is judicial cleansing in the sprinkled blood of the trespass offering, which is the leper's consecration to God... Then, and not till then, for poor as for rich, comes the anointing from the Holy One. The oil that follows the blood pictures divine power — not life only, and not redemption, or rather purification by blood, which dedicates to God. The priest sprinkles this oil fully before the LORD before he puts any of it on each part of the poor leper, and pours the rest on his head. For the priest did all as carefully for him as for the richest... His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The oil goes to God first

None of this oil touches the man yet. It goes toward God first, and that order carries weight:

Then the anointing takes place, and the power and action of the Spirit of God is at work in the man's consecration. But note first where that action happens. It is before the LORD, in His presence... It is the full present anointing and action of the Spirit of God before God Himself. The priest sprinkled the oil seven times before the LORD... He then put it where the blood had been put. We are no more to grieve the Spirit of God in these things than we are to allow or do anything inconsistent with Christ's blood.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why seven

Seven times, not once. One writer reads the number as a pointer to God's own delight:

Seven speaks of perfection. Look around this world, with all its sorrow and sin and suffering. How wonderful to remember that, despite all these things, One dwells down here now who is altogether well-pleasing to God in heaven... In the same way God can look down now upon the Holy Spirit, and to all eternity He will be His delight in heaven. He dwells in every believer, and is their strength and power for all things of God. Yet we need to remember this first of all: He is down here for God, and for His glory.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

A full claim on a poor man

The oil from this sprinkling goes next onto ear, hand and foot, where the blood went. A cheaper offering buys no smaller surrender:

In the provision for poverty that follows, we find the full character of the trespass offering still kept. Consecration to the Lord must not be lessened. The ear, the hand and the foot must be as wholly His, whether we have little or much to serve Him with.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Small faith, same standing

Why allow a smaller offering at all? One writer ties it to the soul's own measure, not to its standing before God:

The sacrifices of "the eighth day" are connected with the soul's communion. So the measure of the soul's understanding must affect them in some degree. But whatever that measure may be, the grace of God can meet it with those deeply touching words, "such as he is able to get." And not only that: the two turtledoves gave the same privileges to the poor as the two lambs gave to the rich. Both alike pointed to "the precious blood of Christ," which is of infinite, unchanging and eternal value in the judgement of God. All stand before God on the ground of death and resurrection. God brings all into the same place of nearness, but all do not enjoy the same measure of communion.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Same start. Poverty changes nothing in the first stage — the leper provides nothing for the two birds and only looks on.

- Same oil. Rich and poor bring the same oil, and the priest does every action as carefully for the poor man as for the richest.

- Same aim. The priest sprinkles the oil seven times before the LORD before any of it touches the man — the Spirit is here for God's glory first.

- Same claim. Ear, hand and foot are marked as before: a smaller offering never means a smaller surrender.

- Same ground. All stand before God on death and resurrection. What differs is how much communion they enjoy, not how far God accepts them.

Leviticus 14:28 · Darby

And the priest shall put of the oil that is in his hand upon the tip of the right ear of him that is to be cleansed, and upon the thumb of his right hand, and on the great toe of his right foot, upon the place of the blood of the trespass-offering.

Leviticus 14:28 belongs to the rule for a healed leper who cannot afford the full set of offerings. Even here the oil goes on the same right ear, right thumb and right toe — on the exact spot the blood had already touched.

Poverty changes the offering, not the cleansing

The earlier verses allow a cheaper sacrifice for a poor man. They do not allow a shorter ceremony. One writer walks through the poor leper's ritual and notes that the priest left nothing out:

The sprinkled blood of the trespass offering brings judicial cleansing. That blood is the leper's consecration to God. It suits the new creation, and so it is applied to the renewed mind, to the work, and to the walk. Then, and not till then, for poor as for rich, comes the anointing from the Holy One... The oil which follows the blood pictures divine power. The priest sprinkled this oil before the LORD before putting it on each part of the poor leper, and poured the rest on his head. He did all this as carefully for him as for the richest. His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer names what could never be reduced. Whatever else the poor man could skip, one lamb had to die and its blood had to touch him:

This was necessary for rich or poor alike. The priest began with the lamb killed for a trespass offering. It was not simply a sin offering, and still less a ram of consecration for a pleasing aroma. That was the blood the priest sprinkled on each of those parts of his body. Nothing else and nothing less was allowed. The defilement had to be felt and fully met.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Oil on the place of the blood

The verse says where the oil goes: on top of the blood already there. Older translations call the guilt offering the trespass offering, the name used in the quotes below. Commentators read the oil as a picture of the Holy Spirit, and the order as deliberate.

It is striking that the priest put "the oil" "upon the blood of the trespass offering." The blood of Christ is the divine basis of the work of the Holy Spirit. The blood and the oil go together. The priest could not put the oil on the leper until he had first applied the blood of the trespass offering. "In him you also... were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit." The divine accuracy of this picture draws out the praise of the renewed mind.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer draws out what follows. The oil rests on the blood, not on the man's own worth:

The oil can be poured upon the blood. The Holy Spirit seals the value of the blood. What is sealed is not the grasp our hearts have of that value. It is not our appreciation of it, and it is not our intelligence. Instead, God puts His seal on the value of the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ... The oil rests on the blood. In this way God expresses His own satisfaction in the worth of that blood. He also marks the one sprinkled by it as His own for ever.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Three places, one whole man

The ear, the thumb and the toe each have a job to do, and the oil reaches every one of them:

These parts of the body were already marked with blood. So the priest put the oil on the blood. The ear receives messages; the hand and foot carry them out. The oil is a symbol of the Holy Spirit. Only in the strength and power of God's Holy Spirit will the believer be able to respond in a way that suits such divine love and grace. The priest poured the rest of the oil on the head of the cleansed leper, a picture of the whole man being claimed for God.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Small offering, full acceptance

The poor man's doves were worth far less than a lamb. One writer applies this to believers whose grasp of Christ is small:

There are some now who are "rich in faith." Their grasp and enjoyment of the perfections and glory of Christ go far beyond that of others. But the feeblest in the faith, the most trembling babe, is accepted just the same. Set beside others, his estimate of Christ is only like comparing the value of a young pigeon with a "lamb of the first year." Yes, God is so considerate and gracious that He accepts the offerings. He gives the leper all the atoning value of the sin offering. He accepts him in all the acceptability of the burnt offering. He does this not by the measure of the leper's faith and intelligence, but by His own estimate of Christ, which the offerings pictured.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood first. The blood of the trespass offering touched the leper first. Nothing came before it, for rich or poor.

- Oil after. The oil lands on the very spot the blood touched. The Spirit's work rests on Christ's work, never apart from it.

- Whole man. Ear to hear, hand to serve, foot to walk — and the rest poured on the head, claiming every part of the person for God.

- Poverty allowed for. God took the cheaper offering, and the priest carried out every step as carefully for the poorest as for the richest.

- Acceptance measured by Christ. The value sealed is the worth of the blood, not the size of the offering or the strength of the offerer's faith.

Leviticus 14:29 · Darby

And the remainder of the oil that is in the priest's hand he shall put upon the head of him that is to be cleansed, to make atonement for him before Jehovah.

Leviticus 14:29 closes the ceremony for a healed leper who could not afford the full set of offerings. It ends where the rich man's ceremony ended: leftover oil on the head, and atonement made for him. So what does God scale down when a person comes to Him with nothing?

One law for rich and poor

The cheaper offerings change what the man brings, not what the priest does for him. One writer notes that the order holds — blood first, then oil — and that the priest's care never varies:

There is judicial cleansing in the sprinkled blood of the trespass offering. That blood is the leper's consecration to God, suited to the new creation, and so applied to the renewed mind, for work and for walk. Then and not till then, for poor as for rich, comes the anointing from the Holy One... The priest sprinkles all of this oil before Jehovah before he puts it on each part of the poor leper, and pours the rest on his head. For the priest did everything as carefully for him as for the richest. ... His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The log of oil is never reduced

Poverty could reduce the lambs and the flour. It could not reduce the log of oil:

Grace makes allowance here only for falling short on the eighth day. That is where poverty is found now, and long has been. Few rise up to the riches of God's grace in its Christian form and fulness. But the principle must be kept even when the right measure is lacking. The full offering was two unblemished male lambs and one ewe lamb like them, with three measures of fine flour, with oil for the offering, and a log of oil besides. A poor leper who could not bring that was to bring one lamb, with a measure of flour mixed with oil for the offering, and a log of oil. This was indispensable for rich or poor alike.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The oil that never runs out

The priest still had oil in his hand when everything else was done. One writer finds two things in what was left — a supply that never runs out, and surprising company:

It is lovely to see the way the oil never fails. The priest sprinkles it before the Lord seven times, and puts it on the ear, thumb and toe of the leper, and there is still more left. It reminds us of the word, "he gives the Spirit without measure." John 3:34... The oil has met every requirement towards God and towards men in full, and there is still more. The priest pours this on the head of the man who is to be cleansed. Those in Israel who were anointed were the priests, the kings, and, in one case at least, a prophet — and the cleansed lepers! What a wonderful company he is brought into!

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

The head receives oil but never blood

Why does the head receive oil and not blood? One writer points to Christ:

No blood is put upon the head itself, but the rest of the oil is poured on it. "The head of every man is Christ." When Christ Himself is pictured, He is anointed without blood, for in Himself He was sinless and needed no atonement for sin. So when the high priest is consecrated on his own (Lev. 8:6-12), he is bathed, and then the oil is put on him straight away. It was the same when our Lord was baptised in the Jordan. He was "anointed by the Holy Spirit" when the divine Spirit came down on Him at once, in the form of a dove.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What the atonement rests on

The verse names the anointing and the atonement in one breath. One writer shows which of the two the closing words belong to:

After this the priest pours the oil on the head. The whole man is in this way invigorated and refreshed, and held together by the very thing that unites us to Christ Himself, for "he who is joined to the Lord becomes one spirit with him." (1 Cor. 6:17.) The end of the sentence, "to make atonement for him before the LORD," does not refer to the anointing with oil. It refers to the trespass offering, which the anointing carries out in practice.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Accepted on God's valuation, not ours

A pigeon was worth a fraction of a lamb. The poor man's acceptance was not:

There are some now who are "rich in faith," whose grasp and enjoyment of the perfections and glory of Christ are far beyond that of others. But the feeblest in the faith, the most trembling babe, is just as accepted. Compared with others, such a person's estimate of Christ would only be like comparing the value of a young pigeon with a "lamb of the first year." Yes, God is so considerate and gracious that He accepts the offerings. He gives the leper all the atoning value of the sin offering, and accepts him in all the acceptability of the burnt offering. This is not according to the measure of his faith and intelligence, but according to His own estimate of Christ, which the offerings prefigured.

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Summary

- Poverty allowed — the concession is real: fewer lambs, less flour. God meets the man where his means end.

- Oil unreduced — the log of oil is the one item no poverty could shrink; God gives the Spirit without measure.

- Head crowned — the leftover oil goes where no blood went. It puts the cleansed outcast among anointed priests and kings.

- Atonement grounded — the closing words rest on the trespass offering, not on the anointing. The oil carries out what the blood secured.

- Acceptance equal — a trembling beginner stands with the mature believer. God values both by His own estimate of Christ.

Leviticus 14:30 · Darby

And he shall offer one of the turtle-doves, or of the young pigeons, of what his hand was able to get;

The full ritual for the cleansed leper on the eighth day called for three lambs. Verse 30 belongs to a shorter version, written for the man who could not afford them. Two small birds now stand where two lambs stood, measured by what his hand can reach. Does a cheaper offering mean a smaller cleansing?

Where the Allowance Applies

The earlier stages of the leper's cleansing made no allowance for money. The concession comes late, and at one point only:

When the leper first comes to the priest, he has nothing to provide, whether he is poor or rich. The priest has the birds taken for him; the leper simply looks on... Nothing changes for the poorest in Israel either, in washing himself, washing his clothes, or cutting off his hair... It is only on the eighth day, the beginning of a new era, that this difference begins.

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Even on that eighth day, the poor man could not swap every item for birds. One lamb stayed on the list for everyone:

The allowance of grace here applies only to falling short on the eighth day... The full offering was two unblemished male lambs and one ewe lamb like them, with three measures of fine flour, with oil for the grain offering, and a log of oil besides. If the leper could not manage that, he was to take one lamb, with one measure of oil mixed for the grain offering, and a log of oil. This was essential for rich or poor alike... The defilement must be felt and fully met.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Priest's Work Is Not Shortened

The birds buy no shorter ceremony. The oil comes next, and the priest handles all of it:

Then and not till then, for poor as for rich, comes the anointing from the Holy One... The priest sprinkles this oil in full before the LORD before he puts any of it on each part of the poor leper, and pours the rest on his head. For the priest did everything as exactly for him as for the richest. But two turtle doves, or two young pigeons, such as he could get, were enough. One was for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Poverty Pictures

The cheaper offering does not lower what this man owes God. The birds still stand for Christ:

In the provision for poverty that follows, the trespass offering keeps its full character. Consecration to the Lord must not shrink: the ear, the hand and the foot must be wholly His, whether we have little or much to serve Him with. But two turtle-doves or two young pigeons take the place of the lambs for the other offerings... Yet it is Christ, and Christ is God's, and the warmth of the heart is more than accuracy about Him.

Modernised from F W GrantOriginal wording

Weak Faith, Full Acceptance

Money decided which creature he brought. It did not decide how far God accepted him:

The real poverty of the Israelite came out in the sin offering and burnt offering. He could not provide so many lambs, so God in His grace accepted a pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons, instead... Some today are "rich in faith." Their grasp and enjoyment of the perfections and glory of Christ go far beyond that of others. But take the feeblest in faith, the most trembling new believer. Set his estimate of Christ beside theirs and it is like comparing a young pigeon with "a lamb a year old." Both are accepted alike.

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

Accepted on God's Valuation

If the size of the offering set the value, the poor man would always be second class. Commentators answer that the poverty is real, and that it settles nothing:

How often we are "poor"! Our grasp of Christ is often so poor! But still, if we do trust in His precious blood, we have pardon and cleansing. Thank God, it is not my estimation of His worth, but God's estimation, that is so important. Instead of the lambs for the sin offering and burnt offering, I may only be able to afford pigeons. But my acceptance and my cleansing are not affected by that... However keenly we feel our poverty, never let it keep us away from God.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Poverty acknowledged. God writes a second, cheaper version of the ritual for the man whose hand cannot reach the full price. The allowance starts only on the eighth day.

- Poverty limited. No one may swap the lamb of the trespass offering. Rich and poor alike must meet the trespass in full.

- Poverty overruled. Blood on ear, hand and foot; oil sprinkled and poured. The priest performs every step for him as exactly as for the richest.

- Poverty interpreted. The small birds picture a small grasp of Christ. Yet they still point to Christ, and warmth of heart counts for more than accuracy about Him.

- Poverty answered. Both the sin offering and the burnt offering are there. Acceptance rests on God's estimate of Christ, not the offerer's.

Leviticus 14:31 · Darby

of what his hand was able to get shall the one be a sin-offering, and the other a burnt-offering, with the oblation; and the priest shall make atonement for him that is to be cleansed before Jehovah.

Verse 31 closes the rule for a healed leper who cannot afford lambs. Two small birds stand where two lambs stood, so the question is whether a cheaper offering buys a smaller cleansing.

A note on wording: older translations read "such as he is able to get" where the ESV has "whichever he can afford." Several quotes below use the older wording.

Nothing dropped, only made smaller

The rule for the poor cut the cost of the offerings. It did not remove any of them.

God met the person according to what he could afford, yet not one of the offerings could be left out. Nothing less than the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ can enable God, in righteousness, to restore a soul to communion with Himself and put the person back in his place among God's saints. So the poorest still had to bring every offering asked of the richest Israelite. Each man had to bring a trespass offering, a sin offering, a burnt offering and a meat offering. If he could not afford the dearer ones, that was not to stop him coming with such as he was able to get.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Equal standing, unequal enjoyment

One writer links the eighth-day offerings to the soul's communion, then says what the two doves still secured for the poor man.

The sacrifices of "the eighth day" are tied to the soul's communion. So they must, to some degree, depend on how much the soul takes in. But whatever that measure is, the grace of God can meet it with those deeply touching words, "such as he is able to get." More than that, "the two turtle doves" gave the "poor" the same privileges the two lambs gave the rich. Both pointed to "the precious blood of Christ," and in God's judgement that blood has endless, unchanging, eternal power. All stand before God on the ground of death and resurrection. God brings them all into the same place of nearness, but they do not all enjoy the same measure of communion.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where the poverty shows

Grace makes its allowance at one point only, and one writer finds the same shortfall among believers now.

The allowance of grace here is only for the falling short on the eighth day. This is where poverty is found now, and where it has long been found. Few rise up to the riches of God's grace in its Christian form and fullness. But the principle must be kept even when the right measure is lacking.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer weighs the priest's work for the poor man against his work for the rich.

The priest did everything as carefully for him as for the richest. Two turtle doves, or two young pigeons, such as he could get, were enough: one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What was not reduced

The birds replaced the lambs, but one part of the ritual had no cheaper version.

In the provision for poverty that follows, the trespass offering keeps its full character. Consecration to the Lord must not be cut down. The ear, the hand and the foot must be wholly His, whether we have little or much to serve Him with. But two turtle doves or two young pigeons take the place of the lambs for the other offerings. They bring in the thought of the heavenly One again, as on the first day, yet here not fully the divine thought. Yet it is Christ, and Christ is God's, and the warmth of the heart is more than accuracy as to Him.

Modernised from F W GrantOriginal wording

Accepted on God's valuation, not ours

The priest made atonement "before the LORD." Whose estimate, then, settles the matter?

Some today are "rich in faith." Their grasp and enjoyment of the perfections and glory of Christ go far beyond that of others. But the feeblest in faith, the most trembling babe, is just as accepted. Put his estimate of Christ beside another's, and it is like comparing the value of a young pigeon with a "lamb of the first year." God is so thoughtful and gracious that He accepts the offerings. He gives the leper all the atoning value of the sin offering, and accepts him in all the acceptability of the burnt offering. He does this not by the measure of the man's faith and understanding, but by His own estimate of Christ, which the offerings pictured.

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

So one writer turns the poor man's pigeons into a plain appeal:

However strongly we feel our poverty, never let it keep us away from God. Come as we are, in that worthy name, and all will be well.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Poverty — grace lowers the price for the man who cannot afford lambs, never the requirement.

- Provision — he still brought every offering, because nothing less than the sacrifice of Christ restores a soul to communion.

- Parity — two birds won the poor man the privileges two lambs won the rich, since both pointed to the same blood.

- Price — consecration got no discount: ear, hand and foot belonged wholly to God, small offering or large.

- Pronouncement — the priest made atonement "before the LORD," so acceptance rests on God's estimate of Christ, not on our grasp of Him.

Leviticus 14:32 · Darby

This is the law for him in whom is the sore of leprosy, whose hand cannot get what is [regularly prescribed] in his cleansing.

This closing line sums up everything from verse 21 onward. It is a whole law written for one man: the leper who cannot pay for his own cleansing. Does a smaller offering buy a smaller cleansing?

What the "law" covers

Commentators note which part of the ceremony this poverty clause touches. It does not reach back to the two birds of the first day. It governs only the offerings of the eighth day.

From verse 21 to 32 we have the law for the man with a case of leprous disease who cannot afford the offerings for his cleansing. This refers to the sacrifices of "the eighth day," and not to the "two birds alive and clean." The birds could never be left out, because they set forth the death and resurrection of Christ as the only ground on which God can receive a sinner back to Himself. The sacrifices of "the eighth day" are tied to the soul's communion. So they must, in some degree, be affected by the measure of the soul's grasp. But whatever that measure may be, the grace of God can meet it with those deeply touching words, "whichever he can afford."… It is not a question of salvation… It is only a question of the soul's communion, of its enjoyment of Christ.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where rich and poor stood alike

Everything before the eighth day ran the same course for every leper, rich or poor.

There is no difference at all in the earlier part of the restoration. At his first appearance before the priest the leper has nothing to provide, whether he is poor or rich. The two birds picture the foundation truth of being justified from all things by Him who was delivered for our offences and raised again for our justification. The leper does not provide them. He simply looks on. He stands still and sees the salvation of God. The priest commands that the birds be taken for him… The difference begins only on the eighth day, the start of a new period. Even then every returning leper, however poor, must provide one lamb for a trespass offering. In both cases this lamb was to be waved alive before the Lord. This was the only time in Israel that a sacrifice was waved alive. It showed that the man who had lost all his privileges through uncleanness confessed his trespass, and saw it all put away by the death and blood-shedding of the spotless lamb.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

The one offering no one could skip

Grace lowered the cost. But it did not remove the lamb whose blood touched ear, hand and foot.

The allowance of grace here is only for the falling short on the eighth day. This is where poverty is found today, and long has been. Few rise up to the riches of God's grace in its Christian form and fullness. But the principle must be kept even when the right measure is lacking… The poor leper was still to take one lamb, with one measure of oil mingled for the offering, and a log of oil. This was indispensable for rich and poor alike. The priest began with the lamb slain for a trespass offering… Such was the blood sprinkled on each part of his body. Nothing other or less was permitted. The defilement must be felt and fully met.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Poverty changed the price, not the result

The anointing oil followed the blood. The priest gave it the same care for the man who brought birds as for the man who brought lambs.

Then, and not till then, for poor as for rich, comes the anointing from the Holy One… The priest sprinkles all this oil before Jehovah first. Then he puts it on each part of the poor leper and pours the rest on his head. The priest did everything as exactly for him as for the richest. But two turtledoves, or two young pigeons, whichever he could get, were enough — one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. His poverty must not hinder his full cleansing and acceptance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the poor man pictures

Writers read the smaller offering as a picture of a small grasp of Christ's sacrifice rather than a smaller salvation.

The ritual was the same as in the first case, but the birds took the place of lambs in the sin offering and the burnt offering. In this is seen a poverty of apprehension as to the sin offering and burnt offering. There are many who are too poor spiritually to realise properly how sin is dealt with and condemned in the sacrifice of Christ, and they have only a small understanding of that sacrifice being above all for the glory of God (the burnt offering). How good it is then to see God's gracious care for the weak.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The comfort for a poor believer

The verse names the man least able to bring anything. That is exactly why no one should stay away.

How often we are "poor"! Our grasp of Christ is often so poor! But if we do trust in His precious blood, we have pardon and cleansing. Thank God, it is not my estimate of His worth, but God's estimate, that matters… Our faith may be very small. Our appreciation of His worth may be tiny. But if we come in that name, the One to whom we come knows His true worth and value, and we are accepted in Him. However keenly we feel our poverty, never let it keep us away from God.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Poor. The verse is a whole law written around one word — the man whose hand cannot reach the required offerings.

- Provided. His poverty never touched the first day. The priest took the two birds for him — Christ's death and resurrection — while he stood still and looked on.

- Required. Grace still asked one lamb for the trespass offering, its blood on ear, hand and foot. Nothing less would do.

- Equal. The priest worked as exactly over the pigeons as over the lambs. Poverty could not hinder full cleansing and acceptance.

- Accepted. The smaller offering pictures a small grasp of Christ, not a smaller Christ. What counts is God's estimate of His worth, not ours.