Judges 9:22–57

Judges 9:22 · Darby

And Abimelech ruled over Israel three years.

Gideon refused to be king and said God alone should rule Israel. One chapter later his son holds that place for three years, and those years show what comes of taking what God never gave.

A Name That Claimed What Gideon Refused

His very name was a claim. One writer traces how deep the ambition ran:

Disobedience produces its fruit, and now you find Abimelech, son of Gideon, rising up to take the place of his father... He rises as king. Someone gave him his name — perhaps his mother, to show his link to the great man of Israel and to cover the shame of his birth. The name shows how the subtle spirit was at work, whether it found expression or not: "My father was king." That is the very thing his father was not. His father refused to be king, and said God alone should be their king. And yet here is the son who declares that his father was king. What is more, he declares in the strongest way that his son also is going to be king.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Ruler, Not Judge

God raised up judges to lead Israel. Abimelech wanted a higher place than that:

The wretched Abimelech was not a judge. He sought a still higher position: he had himself proclaimed king (v. 6). Among the people he took the title used by those who rule over the nations. By claiming this title openly (v. 2), he acted in the opposite way to a judge whom God had raised up. To seize this place, he used purely human methods.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A King Made by a Faction

The text says he ruled over Israel, yet the crowd that crowned him was tiny. One writer measures the gap between the claim and the reality:

Then a small segment of Israel's population, the people of Shechem and of Beth Millo, gathered together and made Abimelech king. There appeared to be no energy on the part of the other tribes to resist this arrogant seizing of authority. It may be that most just ignored him, for nothing is said of his even attempting to attract the other tribes to him. Yet he was considered king over all Israel (v. 22).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Three Years, No Blessing

The reign was short, and no blessing came with it:

Abimelech's rule lasted only three years. It was truly a matter of man ruling man to his hurt. God could not bless a kingdom set up in such a way. Both Abimelech and the men of Shechem had left Him out of their calculations. Both came to a tragic end. Today men do likewise. They too will find that God will not be mocked.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

The Hand Behind the Collapse

The three years end when the men of Shechem turn against the king they made — and behind that, God Himself:

After Abimelech had reigned only three years, God stepped in. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended both them and Abimelech to suffer the consequences of working together in wickedness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer traces each step back to God, and answers whether that is righteous:

It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought back on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask, in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Bramble Spirit Today

The bramble is not only an old story. The desire for a place above others is a live danger:

Let us not be seeking a place. Let us not be like Abimelech, wanting to step into the empty chair of the leader before him, the place his father had refused... wherever people think that certain ones are rulers, and will stay rulers despite anything in themselves or in the saints, be sure it is the bramble — a plant with no fruit for God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Shadow Cast Forward

Some writers read Abimelech as a picture of a ruler still to come:

The glory of the LORD and the blessing of His people were not before him; he wanted to exalt himself — he would be king... Now the Lord has declared that "everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted." Abimelech proved that word true, and so will the evil figure he foreshadows in the future.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Claim — The name means "my father was king," asserting the one thing Gideon had refused.

- Crown — A faction at Shechem made him king; the nation never chose him, yet Scripture counts him as ruling over Israel.

- Contrast — He was no judge raised up by God, but a man taking the title of the surrounding nations by human methods.

- Clock — Three years is the whole of it; a kingdom built by leaving God out cannot be blessed.

- Collapse — God Himself set the king and his makers against each other. The evil of both came back on their own heads.

Judges 9:23 · Darby

And God sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the citizens of Shechem; and the citizens of Shechem dealt treacherously with Abimelech,

Abimelech killed his brothers and bought a crown with silver from a pagan temple. Three years later the alliance that held him up cracked. Scripture traces the crack straight back to God. The verse forces two questions: how can God send an evil spirit, and why would He send one here?

God's timing behind the breakdown

Nothing here happened by accident. The break came at a moment God chose, and both sides were targets.

Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and changed how the men of Shechem felt about him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God meant both they and Abimelech to suffer for the wickedness they had shared in (vv. 23-24). They had made Abimelech king, but they felt no loyalty to him, so they were ready to pull him down.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What "God sent an evil spirit" means

The same wording appears elsewhere in Scripture. Behind it stands a rule about evil itself: it never acts without God's leave, and never past the limit He sets.

Evil as well as good has its commission from God — not its existence, but its liberty to act, and the limits of its action. So we see in Job in early times, and in Ahab's case later; and what a comfort it is to know this. Nothing can escape from the divine government by the fact or admission of its being evil. How should it? Only in this way can we be at peace, assured that no waves can rise higher than the footstool of His throne.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Not every such sending means the same thing. One writer draws a line between a spirit sent as sentence and a trouble sent as training.

But let me add this. A "messenger of Satan" may be sent out from the presence of God against either the flesh or the heart of man. An evil spirit from the Lord came upon Saul, and a lying spirit came upon the prophets of Ahab. 1 Sam. 16; 1 Kings 22. The Lord was beginning solemn acts of judgment. So He sent these messengers of Satan against the hearts of those who were justly under judgment. But other messengers of Satan reach only the body or the circumstances, as in the case of Paul and of Job. And this is only discipline, not judgment.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

A partnership that deserved to fall apart

Bribery formed the bond God broke. Money from an idol's temple paid for the murder of Gideon's family.

Treasure taken from the house of a false god kept this man in power. That silver did the devil's work. Baal's treasure took the place of Jehovah's power. It gave him the means to persecute and cut off the offspring of faith, the family of God (v. 5).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the spirit produced

Abimelech kept his throne for a while. Look at what life in Israel became under him, and at the one man who stood apart.

Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Internal quarrels, treacheries, struggles for power — these were the troubles that shook the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred. But Jehovah, in His grace, made a ray of light shine in the middle of the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony... And should there be, as here, only a single witness left for God in this world, may we be that one.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Punishment measured, then stopped

The same hand that let Abimelech loose also cut him down. God used him as an instrument of justice, and no further.

The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had helped in the wicked murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's wrath praise the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his wrath. God brought on him the miserable destruction he fully deserved.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The warning carried over

Abimelech traded on his father's name for his own gain. The same principle reaches past ancient Shechem.

In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when a man uses anything of the sort for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap: if he sows to the flesh, of the flesh he reaps corruption.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — an idol's silver bought the alliance, and murder sealed it. God broke what guilt had built.

- Commission — evil does not get its existence from God. Its freedom to act, and the limits of that freedom, come from Him.

- Character — a spirit sent in judgment strikes the heart. Trials that touch only the body are discipline, not judgment.

- Consequence — that spirit brought no peace. It brought treachery and slaughter, with one faithful witness still shining in the dark.

- Close — God used Abimelech's rage as far as justice required, then stopped him. What a man sows, he reaps.

Judges 9:24 · Darby

that the violence [done] to the seventy sons of Jerubbaal might come, and their blood be laid upon Abimelech their brother, who slew them, and upon the citizens of Shechem, who had strengthened his hands to slay his brethren.

Here God explains why Abimelech and Shechem turned on each other. The blood of Gideon's seventy sons was coming back on the men who shed it. The verse names two guilty parties, not one — the man who swung the sword and the city that paid for it.

The Crime Being Repaid

Verse 24 looks back to a massacre paid for out of an idol's treasury. One writer follows the money and shows what it bought:

Money taken from the house of a false god supported this man's influence. The usurper appealed to the pockets of the people, and did not despise the unholy source the money came from. This silver did the devil's work. Baal's treasure took the place of Jehovah's power. It gave the usurper the means to persecute and cut off the descendants of faith, the family of God.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Jerubbaal is Gideon's other name. So the seventy men killed here were Gideon's own sons.

Two Guilty Parties

The verse does not let Shechem shelter behind Abimelech. They "strengthened his hands," so the blood is laid on them too. One writer shows how their partnership broke apart:

After Abimelech had reigned only three years, God stepped in. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech… But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but had no sense of loyalty to him, so were willing to remove him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God's Hand Behind the Quarrel

The falling-out looks like ordinary politics. Scripture says it was God. And what God used to punish Shechem was the very man Shechem had crowned:

The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the justice of divine retribution. But when he tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger. God brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God's Righteous Government

Modern readers flinch at a God who repays blood with blood. The same writer answers the objection head-on:

God it was who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous. The teaching of these later days has produced a weak and soft religion. It winces at the bare idea of God using His holy government to carry out justice. He goes on carrying it out all the same.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The End of Abimelech

Abimelech had every military advantage and still did not escape. Older translations render the second saying below as "He who kills with the sword must be killed with the sword":

Righteous retribution follows in due time. God "considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you," and "if anyone is to be slain with the sword, with the sword must he be slain."… But God had decreed his destruction. Abimelech was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and final victory looked all but certain. Then a woman threw a piece of a millstone on his head and crushed his skull. God is not limited in His means.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Principle Still Standing

What happened at Shechem was not a one-off. One writer states the rule behind it, then marks off what it does not touch:

"Whatever one sows, that will he also reap." This, however, is not grace but government. Still it is true of a saint as well as of a sinner… I shall never reap the reward of my sins in eternal blessedness, for it is infinite grace. But in the way of righteous government I shall reap the reward of my wrongdoing down here.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood — this verse settles a debt. Seventy of Gideon's sons were murdered, and God had not forgotten them.

- Hands — Shechem never held the knife. But they strengthened the hands that did, and the verse charges them with the same murder.

- Partners — both were guilty, so God turned them against each other. Each became His tool of judgment on the other.

- Limits — God used Abimelech's rage only as far as justice required. Then a woman's millstone stopped him. God is not short of means.

- Harvest — what Shechem sowed, Shechem reaped, and the rule still holds. This is God's government here and now. It is not His grace, which settles sin for eternity.

Judges 9:25 · Darby

And the citizens of Shechem set liers in wait for him on the tops of the mountains, and they robbed all that came along that way by them. And it was told Abimelech.

The men of Shechem crowned Abimelech king. Three years later they set ambushes for him in the hills, and the travellers on that road paid for it. Why did the partnership break so fast, and who was behind the break?

The Alliance Turns on Itself

The men who crowned Abimelech felt no duty to keep him.

Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but felt no loyalty to him, so were willing to remove him. They put men in ambush against Abimelech, robbing all the people who passed that way. But Abimelech was told about this and of course avoided the danger to himself.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God Behind the Breakdown

Behind the quarrel between Abimelech and Shechem, one writer sees God's hand.

It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought all their evil back on the heads of the men of Shechem. And we may ask, in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous. Modernist teaching in recent times has produced a weak and soft religiosity. It flinches at the very idea of God exercising His holy government in executing justice. He goes on executing it all the same; and before long we may see further striking displays of it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Word Spoken Three Years Earlier

Jotham was the one son of Gideon who escaped the killing of his brothers. Three years before this ambush, he stood on the mountain and put Shechem to a test.

If this was truthful and sincere dealing, then let them rejoice in Abimelech and let him rejoice in the people of Shechem. Of course it is clear this was not truthful dealing, but grossly wicked. So Jotham adds, "But if not, let fire come out from Abimelech and devour the leaders of Shechem and Beth-millo; and let fire come out from the leaders of Shechem and from Beth-millo and devour Abimelech." God had put this prophecy into Jotham's mouth, and it came true only three years later. But Jotham then ran away, going to Beer to live at a distance from his cruel brother.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Throne Built on Violence

Where did this kingdom come from? One writer traces it back to its foundation.

He sets himself to exercise authority over the people of God, and to do so he builds his throne on violence. There must be violence if there is rule of that kind; if there is the rule of man, it must be by violence. So he kills all his brothers, all the many sons of Gideon, with a single exception. Having cut off all rivals this way, he goes to Shechem, his mother's town, the town according to nature.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Is Left When God's Witness Is Gone

Highway robbery, plotting, and betrayal are not isolated crimes here. They are the atmosphere of a nation that has driven out its one faithful voice.

Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. There were internal quarrels, treacheries, and struggles for supremacy. Harvests ended in drunken celebration, and drunkenness vented itself in curses. Then came the ambition of Gaal, the schemes of Ebed, the cunning of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. Such were the troubling elements that disturbed the camp of Israel when the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred. But the Lord, in His grace, caused a ray of light to shine in the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony. We may say this again with confidence as we pass through difficult times.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Collusion. Shechem and Abimelech built their partnership on the murder of Gideon's sons. God made both partners pay for it.

- Collapse. Three years was all the loyalty lasted — men who crown a king by bribe will ambush him by night.

- Cause. The verse reads like politics. Scripture names the mover: God sent the evil spirit between them.

- Casualties. Abimelech was warned, so the ambush missed him. The travellers on that road paid instead.

- Comfort. Even in a scene of treachery and slaughter, God did not leave Himself without a witness. Jotham's word came true.

Judges 9:26 · Darby

And Gaal the son of Ebed came with his brethren, and went over to Shechem; and the citizens of Shechem put confidence in him.

Three years into Abimelech's reign, the city that crowned him wants someone new. A stranger named Gaal arrives and wins its trust at once — and the chapter shows what becomes of people who keep trusting the nearest strong man.

An opportunist arrives

Gaal reads the mood of a discontented city and moves in. What follows is a feast in the temple of the local idol.

Another man, Gaal, the son of Ebed, was ready to take advantage of the situation. He came to Shechem and won over the confidence of the Shechemites. He was a similar character to Abimelech, aspiring to have all authority in his hands. To celebrate the promotion of Gaal, the people gathered grapes from their vineyards and pressed out the juice. They went into the house of their idol, eating and drinking and cursing Abimelech. Such is the folly of men of the world.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God behind the falling-out

Gaal's opening was no accident. Something had moved Shechem to turn on the king it made.

Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended both them and Abimelech to suffer the consequences of their shared wickedness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Is that just? One writer puts the question plainly:

God it was, who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was, who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Misplaced confidence

Shechem had trusted one man and been burned. Now they trust another. Earlier in the chapter Jotham had called their king a bramble, a thorn bush.

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. That is especially true when it is a question of God's things.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The pattern did not end at Shechem:

Men must have a leader. How ready they are to follow any upstart who can promise enough good times to come! And how constantly disappointed and deceived they are by those they follow. That must be the experience of all through life. It lasts until they find and follow the true Leader, the One whom God has appointed to be the Shepherd and Leader of men.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Jotham's words coming true

Jotham had warned of fire between the city and its king. Gaal is the match.

Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham prophesied. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He led them to curse Abimelech and to rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo, and at first he seemed to be winning everything.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What the two names carry

The two names in this verse carry meaning. One writer reads them as part of the message, and applies the story to later church history.

Take Abimelech as a short picture of the rise and downfall of the power of Rome in Christendom. Then we may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude" — which is indeed the translation of his name. That loathing drives the nations to throw off their allegiance to the man they first lifted into power.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer records how the revolt of Gaal ended:

He is overcome. Abimelech and his officer Zebul are victorious.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Disgust with a tyrant is not the same as deliverance from him.

A picture of life without God's testimony

Set the whole cast side by side and see what Israel's camp had become.

Internal quarrels, betrayals, struggles for supremacy. Grape harvests that end in drunken hilarity, and drunkenness spilling over into curses. The ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the unsettling elements that troubled the camp of Israel, once the testimony of God had left it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Confidence given. Shechem's leaders trust a newcomer who saw an opening. It is the same misplaced confidence that made Abimelech king.

- Confidence engineered. God moved Shechem to turn, so that both partners in wickedness would suffer for it.

- Confidence celebrated. They marked Gaal's rise with a harvest feast in an idol's house and curses on the king they once cheered.

- Confidence betrayed. Gaal's rebellion collapsed; loathing your tyrant is not the same as escaping him.

- Confidence that holds. Trusting in man is trusting a bramble. The Leader God appointed, the Shepherd of men, never disappoints those who follow Him.

Judges 9:27 · Darby

And they went out into the fields, and gathered their vineyards, and trode [the grapes], and made rejoicings, and went into the house of their god, and ate and drank, and cursed Abimelech.

Abimelech had bought his crown with silver from an idol's temple, then killed his brothers to keep it. Verse 27 is the first spark: the men who crowned him hold a harvest feast in that idol's temple, and end it by cursing him.

Whose House They Feasted In

The verse says they went into "the house of their god." Commentators name that god. The name itself shows how far Israel had joined itself to its neighbours.

Israel had once again lapsed into idolatry, and taken Baal-berith to be their god. The words mean "lord of the covenant." That may simply mean "covenant-lord," and it may mean more. The worship of Baal was at least a sign of covenant with the Canaanites, whose god he was. The history here gives clear proof of alliance with the pagan nations. Baal-worship and mixing with the Canaanites are found at their worst in the story of crime and bloodshed that follows here.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The Harvest That Should Have Been Joy

A grape harvest once carried a meaning in Israel. Jotham's parable, earlier in this chapter, says what it was.

The vine said: "Should I leave my wine, which cheers God and man, and go to be promoted over the trees?" New wine is the joy found in the shared communion of men with God. Israel lost that joy — the highest joy anyone could desire — when they adopted the spirit and ways of the nations.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

A Feast That Ends In Curses

This was not innocent high spirits. One writer lists the feast among the signs of a camp that God's testimony had left. He follows the line from the wine straight to the curses.

Abimelech was successful. The evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Internal quarrels, betrayals, struggles for supremacy; grape harvests that produced drunken hilarity; drunkenness finding its outlet in curses. Then the ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. Such were the disturbing elements which troubled the camp of Israel, once the testimony of God had left it.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The party even had an occasion behind it.

To celebrate the promotion of Gaal, the people gathered grapes from their vineyards, pressed out the juice and went into the house of their idol, eating and drinking and cursing Abimelech. Such is the folly of men of the world.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where Israel Had Chosen To Stand

The cursing at this feast fits a choice the nation had already made.

Long before, Moses had decreed that six tribes should stand on Mount Ebal to curse, and six on Mount Gerizim to bless. Joshua remembered this when the people entered Canaan. But since then Israel had morally chosen Ebal, the place of cursing. Jotham chose Gerizim, the place of blessing, and he stood there alone.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Same Mouths That Crowned Him

Shechem had cheered for Abimelech. Now Shechem curses him. Commentators see God's hand behind the change, and guilt on both sides.

After Abimelech had reigned only three years, God intervened by moving the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer for joining together in wickedness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The curses at the feast grew into open rebellion. The rebellion grew into a fire that burned both ways.

Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham prophesied. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous men of Shechem. He led them to curse Abimelech and to rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king in turn, to devour them and the house of Millo.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Lesson For Anyone Choosing Leaders

The warning outlives Shechem. Men lifted up a man, and reaped betrayal and fire.

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. That is true above all when it is a question of God's things.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Idol — The feast fills the temple of Baal-berith, "lord of the covenant." Worship of that god was itself proof that Israel had allied with the Canaanites.

- Wine — Wine in this chapter stands for joy shared between God and man. Israel lost that joy when it took up the spirit and ways of the nations around it.

- Curse — Drunken cheer turns into cursing, and the mouths that crowned Abimelech now curse him. Israel had morally chosen Ebal, the mountain of cursing, while Jotham stood alone on Gerizim, the mountain of blessing.

- Fire — God moved Shechem against Abimelech, so that both partners in the crime would bear the cost. The curse at the feast grows into the fire Jotham foretold, and it consumes each side in turn.

- Warning — The chapter is the bitter harvest of one man's pride and a city's folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God.

Judges 9:28 · Darby

And Gaal the son of Ebed said, Who is Abimelech, and who is Shechem, that we should serve him? is he not the son of Jerubbaal? and Zebul his overseer? Serve the men of Hamor the father of Shechem! and why should *we* serve him?

The city that lifted Abimelech into power has turned against him. At a harvest feast a man named Gaal says out loud what the men of Shechem already feel. His question challenges Abimelech's right to rule. It also offers himself in Abimelech's place.

A boast at the harvest feast

Gaal speaks as though the city is already his. One writer sets his boast beside what he said next:

Gaal could then be very bold in asking, "Who is Abimelech, and who are we of Shechem, that we should serve him?" (v. 28). This is only a case of one broken piece of pottery quarrelling with another. The proud words fall from his lips: "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech" (v. 29). Then he sent a message for Abimelech to build up his army and come out to battle.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The name behind the challenge

Gaal does not simply attack Abimelech. He points Shechem back to an older name — Hamor, the city's prince in Jacob's day:

Prince of the Hivites and father of Shechem. Jacob bought a piece of ground from his family, and Joseph was buried in it. Genesis 33:19; Joshua 24:32; Judges 9:28. He is called Emmor in Acts 7:16. Simeon and Levi killed him with the sword, along with Shechem and all the males of the city, to avenge their sister Dinah.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the appeal reaches back past Israel, to a family line that fell to the sword long before.

Loathing bred by servitude

The names in this scene carry their own commentary. One writer reads them as a picture of what happens when people tire of the ruler they themselves raised up:

We may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude." That is in fact the translation of his name. It stirs the nations to throw off their allegiance to the very man they first lifted into power. No wonder the descendants of the "wild ass" (Hamor) rebel against so harsh a yoke as the one they had put their own necks into! But escaping from it is another matter. It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Words thrown back at him

Gaal's boast did not go unanswered. Zebul, the officer he had just named, threw the words back at him:

Zebul was ready to distract him, and told him he was only seeing the shadows of the mountains as if they were men. But Gaal kept watching, and insisted there were two companies of people coming from different directions (v. 37). Then Zebul taunted Gaal with the reminder of his own words, "Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised (v. 28). Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal had to gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself; he could do nothing else.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A camp without testimony

Gaal's ambition is one item on a longer list. One writer sets them side by side to show what the scene had become:

Abimelech was successful. The evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Once the testimony of God had left the camp of Israel, unsettling elements troubled it. There were internal quarrels, betrayals, and struggles for supremacy. Grape harvests produced drunken merriment, and drunkenness vented itself in curses. There was the ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, and the violence of Abimelech.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer then turns to the one witness left:

He does not leave Himself without testimony. We can say this again with confidence as we pass through difficult times. And if there is, as here, only a single witness left for God in this world, may we be that one — that despised Jotham, the last of all, but standing firm for God.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Beware of trusting in man

Shechem trusted one man, and it went wrong. Now Gaal asked the city to trust him instead. One writer draws the lesson of Abimelech's pride and Shechem's folly:

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable, Judges 9 — and especially when it is a question of God's things.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Trust misplaced. Shechem trusted Abimelech. When that soured, it moved its trust to Gaal — one broken piece of pottery quarrelling with another.

- Trust in names. Gaal's argument rests on ancestry. He calls the city back to Hamor, whose house fell to the sword long before.

- Trust bred of loathing. His name means loathing bred by servitude. People throw off the ruler they raised up. Throwing him off is easier than escaping him.

- Trust that traps. Zebul repeated Gaal's boast back to him. Gaal had committed himself, and now he had no choice but to fight.

- Trust that holds. In a camp of ambition, craft and violence, God kept one witness standing. The chapter's warning holds: do not trust in man, above all in the things of God.

Judges 9:29 · Darby

Oh! would that this people were under my hand! then would I remove Abimelech. And he said to Abimelech, Increase thine army, and come out.

Shechem's people crowned Abimelech king, and now they have turned against him. At a harvest feast Gaal offers himself as the man who could remove him, raising the question: what is a leader worth when people, not God, put him there?

A Second Abimelech

Gaal is no better than the man he wants to replace. He wins the city with the same appetite for power, in a setting of feasting and cursing.

Another man, Gaal, the son of Ebed, was ready to take advantage of the situation, and coming to Shechem, won over the confidence of the Shechemites. He was a similar character to Abimelech, aspiring to have all authority in his hands. To celebrate the promotion of Gaal, the people gathered grapes from their vineyards and pressed out the juice. They went into the house of their idol, eating and drinking and cursing Abimelech. Such is the folly of men of the world.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two Broken Pots

The wish for the people to be under his hand is a claim to command. But set beside the man he challenges, it is a quarrel between equals, and neither is worth anything.

Gaal could then be very bold in asking, "Who is Abimelech, and who are we of Shechem, that we should serve him?" (v. 28). This is only a case of one broken piece of pottery fighting with another, and the proud words fall from his lips: "Would that this people were under my hand! Then I would remove Abimelech" (v. 29). Then he issued a message for Abimelech to increase his army and come out to battle.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Meaning Hidden in His Name

His name carries the mood he is trading on. It also carries the trap: shaking off a yoke is easier to shout about than to do.

We may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred by "servitude." That is in fact what his name means. It is what stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the man they themselves first lifted into power. No wonder the descendants of Hamor — whose name means "wild ass" — rebel against so harsh a yoke, when they put their own necks into it. But escaping it is another matter.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Who Set the Quarrel in Motion

Gaal thinks he is seizing an opening. God made that opening, and God made it to catch both sides.

Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the results of joining together in wickedness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Boast Comes Back to Him

Gaal gets his answer sooner than he expects. The man standing beside him at the gate throws his own words back at him.

Then Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words: "Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The crowd that cheered him does not stand with him either.

The men of Shechem receive a rival to Abimelech. They receive him in a half-hearted way, and then thrust him out to meet Abimelech, who puts him to flight.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Camp That Had Lost Its Witness

Gaal's ambition is one thread in a tangle. Each figure in the chapter adds a different vice. Together they show what remains when God's testimony leaves.

Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. There were quarrels within, betrayals and struggles for the top place. There were grape harvests that ended in drunken laughter, and drunkenness that poured itself out in curses. There was the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel, once the testimony of God had left it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Only Safe Hand

Jotham had already named the alternative to brambles fighting brambles.

The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail. He is the true Vine, the Olive and the Fig Tree of which Jotham spoke in contrast to the useless bramble. Yes, all His people's need is found in Him.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Same hand. Gaal wants the people "under my hand" — the very craving that produced Abimelech. Swapping one grasping ruler for another changes nothing.

- Same clay. The contest is one broken pot fighting another. The proud words come from a man who is himself only a broken piece.

- Same yoke. His name means loathing bred of servitude. People rebel against a yoke they put their own necks into, and find escaping it is another matter.

- Same reckoning. God moved Shechem against Abimelech so both partners in the wickedness would reap it. Gaal's rebellion is the tool, not the escape.

- Another hand. Brambles burn each other; the Vine, Olive and Fig Tree bear fruit. The Lord alone is our sufficiency, and He meets every need of His people.

Judges 9:30 · Darby

And Zebul the ruler of the city heard the words of Gaal the son of Ebed, and his anger was kindled;

Judges 9 tells how Shechem made Abimelech king and then turned against him. This verse catches the moment his deputy in the city hears that a rival is speaking against him. The anger that flares here sets a battle in motion. But the deeper question is who directs these quarrels, and why.

Gaal's Boast That Lit The Fuse

Zebul's anger answers something said. A newcomer named Gaal had won the city's confidence, and his talk grew bold.

Gaal then could be very bold in questioning, "Who is Abimelech and who is Shechem, that we should serve him?" (v. 28). This is only a case of one piece of broken pottery from the earth fighting with another, and the proud words fall from his lips: "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech" (v. 29). Then he issued a message for Abimelech to increase his army and come out to battle.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The names in this story carry meaning too. One writer links Gaal's name to the feeling that breeds revolt:

Take Abimelech as a short picture of the rise and ruin of Rome's power in Christendom. Then perhaps we may see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred by "servitude" — which is in fact what his name means. That loathing stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the very man they first lifted into power.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The Ruler Of The City

Zebul's title names a job, not an honour. He held the city for someone else:

Governor of Shechem for Abimelech while the latter was absent. Judges 9:28-41.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So an attack on Abimelech's right to rule was an attack on the post Zebul held.

Anger That Worked In Secret

Zebul did not confront Gaal. He had kept quiet while the city's mood turned, and he used that quiet to act.

However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathize with Gaal, though he had evidently kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech to warn him of what Gaal was doing (vv. 30-31). He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack the city in the morning (vv. 32-33).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Craft, Not Courage

Zebul is not a hero of the story. Set beside the others in the chapter, his part has its own flavour — and the whole cast together shows what Israel had become.

Quarrels at home, betrayals, struggles for the top place, grape harvests that ended in drunken merrymaking, drunkenness that poured itself out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech — these were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred. But Jehovah, in His grace, caused a ray of light to shine in the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Whose Anger Was It?

The quarrel between Shechem and its king did not begin with Gaal or Zebul. Earlier in the chapter the cause is named, and one writer refuses to soften it:

It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who paid back the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same rule reaches far beyond Abimelech:

In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when anyone uses such a thing for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown — Abimelech seized power for self and not for God. Every later scene in the chapter is the harvest of that sowing.

- Loathing — Gaal's boast is the resentment of people who lifted a man into power and then could not bear the yoke they chose.

- Office — Zebul governed Shechem for the absent king. His anger is the anger of a man whose own place depends on Abimelech's.

- Craft — He answers with craft, not courage. He keeps quiet and sends a secret message that puts an army outside the walls by night.

- Reaped — Behind the ambition, the craft and the violence stands God. His righteous hand repays both the king and the city, and still leaves one witness for Himself in the dark.

Judges 9:31 · Darby

and he sent messengers to Abimelech craftily, saying, Behold, Gaal the son of Ebed and his brethren are come to Shechem, and behold, they shut up the city against thee;

Shechem made Abimelech king, and three years later the same city turned against him. The warning came from Zebul, Abimelech's own governor inside the walls.

A city turning on the king it made

The trouble did not begin with Gaal. One commentator traces the revolt to God's own hand, and to guilt on both sides:

Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proved too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of joining together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, yet felt no loyalty to him, so they were willing to remove him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The message sent in secret

Zebul never sided with Gaal, but he said nothing out loud. He acted in secret instead, and sent Abimelech more than a warning:

However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathize with Gaal, though he had clearly kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech to warn him of what Gaal was doing. He also advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack in the morning. Abimelech acted on this advice, having all his army ready for a surprise attack on Gaal and his men.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Older translations call the message "craftily" sent, and say Gaal's men were shutting the city up against Abimelech rather than stirring it up. The next morning showed how crafty Zebul was. He stood beside Gaal and lied to his face. Gaal saw men coming down from the hills, and Zebul told him he was only seeing shadows. Then he threw Gaal's own boast back at him:

Zebul was ready to distract him, and told him he was only seeing the shadows of the mountain as if they were men. But Gaal was now watching closely. He insisted that two companies of people were coming from different directions. Then Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words: "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" These, he said, were the very people Gaal had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Names that carry the meaning

One writer finds the character of both men in their names. Gaal's name means loathing bred of servitude. Zebul's part is craft, not loyalty:

In Gaal, the son of Ebed, we may perhaps see the "loathing" bred of "servitude" — that is exactly what his name means. It is a loathing that stirs the nations to throw off their allegiance to the very man they first lifted into power... And Zebul, whose character all through is craft, is Abimelech's officer to keep the city obedient. He may easily stand for the appearance of holiness that a power like Rome knows so well how to use when it enforces its claims.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Commentators differ over the larger picture. One reads Abimelech's rise and fall as the course of Rome's power. Another sees him as a foreshadowing of the man of sin, an evil ruler still to come:

In the Old Testament Scriptures the Spirit of God has drawn our attention to several men who clearly foreshadow the coming man of sin. Among them Abimelech the son of Gideon holds a solemn place.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A camp with no testimony left

The secret message is one strand in a chapter of double-dealing. One writer lists the whole scene, naming each man by the vice he brought:

Quarrels at home, betrayals, fights for the top place, grape harvests that ended in drunken laughter, drunkenness that poured itself out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God's righteous hand in the quarrel

Secret messengers and betrayals look like human scheming and nothing more. One writer names the older crime underneath them, and God as the one repaying it:

The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who paid Abimelech back for his own wickedness. It was God who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Collusion. Shechem backed the murder of Gideon's sons and made Abimelech king. God intended both sides to reap what that shared wickedness earned.

- Rebellion. Gaal's name means loathing bred of servitude. It is the resentment that turns on the very man it once lifted into power.

- Craft. Zebul keeps quiet, sends word in secret, then tells Gaal he is seeing shadows. His weapon is deceit, not courage.

- Collapse. Once God's testimony left the camp of Israel, ambition, advice, craft and violence were all it had.

- Government. This is not just politics. God sent the evil spirit between them and returned their evil on their own heads, and He was right to do it.

Judges 9:32 · Darby

and now, rise up by night, thou and the people that are with thee, and lie in ambush in the fields.

Abimelech's own kingmakers have turned against him, and a newcomer named Gaal now holds the city's confidence. Zebul, Abimelech's officer inside Shechem, secretly tells him to march at night and lie in wait in open country — but who is really directing that march?

The Advice Zebul Sends

The verse is one line inside a secret message. One writer sets out the whole exchange:

However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathise with Gaal, though he had evidently kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech, warning him of what Gaal was doing (vv. 30-31). He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack in the morning (vv. 32-33). Abimelech acted on this advice, having all his army ready for a surprise attack on Gaal and his men.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Quarrel God Had Set in Motion

The rebellion did not begin with Gaal. Three years earlier, something turned Shechem against the king they had crowned:

Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God intervened. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of working together in wickedness (vv. 23-24).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer says plainly who was behind it:

It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who paid back the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Three Men, Three Kinds of Ambition

One writer traces what each man brings to the quarrel:

We may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude" — which is exactly what his name means. That loathing stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the man they themselves first lifted into power… Zebul shows craft all the way through. He is Abimelech's officer, there to keep the city obedient.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer lists what filled the camp once God's testimony was gone:

Internal quarrels, treacheries, struggles for supremacy. Grape harvests that ended in drunken partying, and drunkenness that spilled over into cursing. The ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the disturbing elements that troubled the camp of Israel, once God's testimony had left it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the Night Attack Finally Won

Zebul's plan worked. Abimelech took the field, beat Gaal, and went on to level the city — and the victory was itself the judgment Jotham had foretold:

Just as Jotham prophesied, fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He made them curse Abimelech and rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo. At first he seemed to carry all before him. But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and the final victory looked all but sure, when a woman threw a piece of millstone down on his head and crushed his skull.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Lesson for Us

A chapter of ambushes and betrayals leaves one practical warning:

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly, and teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable, Judges 9 — and especially so when it is a question of God's things.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The same writer points to where trust does belong:

The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Trust — Shechem lifted a bramble into power. This verse is part of the bitter harvest. Beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God.

- Treachery — Zebul keeps quiet, then sends word in secret. But the rebellion he reports was God's own doing. Both sides would suffer for the wickedness they shared.

- Craft — Gaal is the loathing bred by servitude. Zebul is the crafty officer who keeps the city obedient.

- Retribution — the ambush worked and Shechem fell. Then a woman's millstone ended Abimelech. God is not unrighteous when He takes vengeance.

- Refuge — a camp without God's testimony bred only quarrels and craft. The Lord alone is our sufficiency, and His love and power never fail.

Judges 9:33 · Darby

And it shall be in the morning when the sun is up, thou shalt rise early, and fall upon the city; and behold, he and the people that is with him shall come out against thee, and thou shalt do with him as thou shalt find occasion.

Shechem made Abimelech king, and now the city has turned on him and is backing a rival named Gaal. Verse 33 is the second half of a secret message from Zebul, the city's own governor. He plans a night march and a dawn raid — but who is really directing all this scheming?

The Advice in the Message

Zebul was Abimelech's officer in a city that had turned against Abimelech. Verse 33 sets the timing of the attack, and one writer lays out the whole plan:

However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathise with Gaal, though he had evidently kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech to warn him of what Gaal was doing (vv. 30-31). He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack the city in the morning (vv. 32-33). Abimelech acted on this advice, having all his army ready for a surprise attack on Gaal and his men.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Man Standing Beside the Target

The plan depended on Gaal seeing nothing until it was too late. At dawn the man who had sent the letter stood beside Gaal, talking him out of what his own eyes were telling him:

Early in the morning Gaal went out and stood at the entrance to the city gate. He said to Zebul, who was with him, "Look, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains!" Zebul was ready to put him off. He told him he saw only the shadows of the mountain, as if they were men. But Gaal was watching closely now. He insisted that two companies of people were coming from different directions. Then Zebul taunted Gaal with the reminder of his words, "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" ... Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Alliance Broke Apart

Zebul could only write that letter because Shechem and its king had already fallen out. The split had a deeper cause than politics:

Abimelech had reigned only three years when God stepped in. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of joining together in wickedness (vv. 23-24). They had made Abimelech king, but they felt no loyalty to him, so they were willing to remove him from power.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two Hands on the Same Sword

Shechem and Abimelech each fought for their own ends. The end of the chapter says another hand was at work, and it shows how far God let Abimelech's success run:

The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to chastise them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's wrath praise the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his wrath. He brought on him the miserable destruction which he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse — and that curse came true.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the Whole Scene Shows

These plots and quarrels show what Israel had become. The same passage shows where to stand when things go that way:

Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Once the testimony of God had left the camp of Israel, unsettling things troubled it. There were internal quarrels, treacheries and struggles for supremacy. There were grape harvests that ended in drunken laughter, and drunkenness venting itself in curses. There was the ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul and the violence of Abimelech... And if only a single witness is left for God in this world, as here, may we be that one. May we be like that despised Jotham — the last of all, but standing firm for God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Collusion. Shechem and Abimelech shared one crime, and God meant both of them to suffer for it.

- Division. God moved the men of Shechem to turn against the king they had crowned. Their falling out was the start of the reckoning.

- Craft. Abimelech's own officer in the city kept quiet, sent word in secret, then stood at the gate calling an advancing army "shadows." Gaal had committed himself and could do nothing else.

- Restraint. God used Abimelech's violence to punish Shechem as it deserved. When Abimelech tried to push further, God cut his wrath short and destroyed him.

- Testimony. Israel's camp was full of ambition, treachery and violence. One despised witness still stood for God. In such times, that is the place to want.

Judges 9:34 · Darby

And Abimelech rose up, and all the people that were with him, by night, and they lay in ambush against Shechem in four companies.

By night Abimelech splits his force into four companies against Shechem — the city that crowned him three years before. The move looks like good soldiering. But why is a king ambushing the city that made him, and who started the quarrel?

A tip-off from inside the city

The plan was not Abimelech's. The city's own governor sent it to him, after staying silent while Gaal stirred Shechem up against the king.

Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathise with Gaal, though he had clearly kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech, warning him of what Gaal was doing (vv. 30-31). He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack in the morning (vv. 32-33). Abimelech acted on this advice, having all his army ready for a surprise attack on Gaal and his men.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God behind the quarrel

The split between the king and the city did not begin with Gaal. One writer traces it back to God, and to a reckoning aimed at both sides.

Abimelech had reigned only three years when God intervened. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of collusion in wickedness (vv. 23-24). They had made Abimelech king, but had no sense of loyalty to him, so were willing to depose him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One writer names God as the actor at every stage, and answers the charge that this makes Him unjust.

The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. God it was who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Night attack as prophecy coming true

Jotham had prophesied that fire would break out between Shechem and its king. The night attack is that fire starting to burn.

Fire came out from the men of Shechem as Jotham prophesied, to devour Abimelech. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He made them curse Abimelech and rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo, and at first he appeared to carry everything before him. But God had decided on his destruction.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What an alliance of self-interest produces

The night attack is one move in a longer breakdown. One writer lists the forces pulling Israel apart at this point.

Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Internal quarrels, betrayals, struggles for supremacy. Grape harvests that ended in drunken excitement, and drunkenness venting itself in curses. The ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the disturbing forces that troubled the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Borrowed reputation, personal harvest

Abimelech's career ran on his father's name. One writer draws a rule out of it that reaches far beyond Abimelech.

In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anything of that sort is used for self and not for God, bitter disappointment must follow. If there is anything in his history more striking than the rest, it is how solemnly God repaid him. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer turns the warning on us.

Let us not be seeking a position. Let us not be like Abimelech, wanting to step into the empty chair of some predecessor — a chair his father had actually refused.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown — Abimelech took the throne through the murder of Gideon's sons, and Shechem shared the guilt. "What a man sows he must reap" governs the rest of the chapter.

- Sent — God moved the city against its king. He meant both sides to answer for their shared wickedness.

- Secret — betrayal sets the ambush up. Abimelech's own governor in Shechem kept quiet, then warned him.

- Success — the surprise attack works. Early victory proves nothing, because God had already decided on his destruction.

- Settled — Jotham's prophecy came true to the letter. The God who repaid Abimelech was righteous in doing it.

Judges 9:35 · Darby

And Gaal the son of Ebed went out, and stood in the entrance of the gate of the city. Then Abimelech rose up, and the people that were with him, out of the ambush.

This verse is the hinge of a trap: Gaal steps out at daybreak to take the city gate as Shechem's new strongman. He does not know that Abimelech's men have been hiding in the fields all night, and that they rise the moment he appears.

The Morning Gaal Walked Into

The verse catches two movements at once: Gaal taking his stand, and the hidden force rising. One commentator sets the scene and follows it through the exchange that comes next, when Gaal squints at the hillsides and is told he is only seeing shadows:

Early in the morning Gaal went out and stood at the entrance to the city gate, and he said to Zebul who was with him, "Look, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains!" Zebul was ready to divert him, and told him he saw only the shadows of the mountain as if they were men. But Gaal was now intent on watching, and insisted that there were two companies of people coming from different directions.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why He Could Not Back Out

Gaal stands in the gate because his own mouth has already put him there. He had boasted in public. Zebul, the man at his side, throws that boast back at him when the troops appear:

Zebul taunted Gaal with his own words: "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Gate Was the Seat of Power

Standing "in the entrance of the gate" is not a detail about geography. In Israel, the gate was where the city settled its business. To sit there was to hold rank:

Gates protected a city, but "in the gate" was also the place where people settled many important matters. When Boaz wanted the question of Ruth and the inheritance settled, he went up to the gate. There he debated the matter with a nearer relative, then closed it, with the elders as witnesses. To "sit in the gate" was a place of honour... It should have been the place of true judgement and justice, but was not always so.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Ambush Behind the Ambush

Behind both men stands God Himself. He stirred up the quarrel between Abimelech and Shechem, and He meant both sides to pay for the wickedness they had shared in:

Abimelech had reigned only three years when God stepped in. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should pay for working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but felt no loyalty to him, so they were willing to remove him. They set men in ambush against Abimelech and robbed everyone who passed that way.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Shechem set the first ambush. In this verse Abimelech rises out of one against them. Another writer follows the same thread of retribution, back to the warning Jotham had spoken over the city:

Righteous retribution follows in due course, for "God considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you." Fire came out from the men of Shechem as Jotham prophesied, to devour Abimelech; Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites and caused them to curse Abimelech and to rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them, and at first he appeared to be winning everything. But God had decreed his destruction.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What the Names Say

The names in this verse carry their own message. One writer weighs what Gaal's name means for a people living under a ruler of their own making:

In Gaal, the son of Ebed, we may perhaps see the "loathing" bred of "servitude." That is indeed the translation of his name. It is what drives the nations to throw off their allegiance to the man they first lifted into power. The descendants of Hamor — whose name means "wild ass" — may well rebel against so harsh a yoke, when they put their own necks into it! But escaping it is another matter.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Whatever the names hint at, the chapter leaves one plain lesson:

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. That is true above all when God's things are at stake.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Yoke. Shechem chose Abimelech; Gaal's name means the loathing bred by servitude. The yoke they resent is one they fastened on themselves.

- Gate. The gate should be the place of true judgement. Gaal takes that seat of honour wanting only power.

- Boast. His earlier words have fixed him in place. When the troops appear, Zebul quotes them back, and Gaal must fight on short notice.

- Ambush. Shechem set ambushes against Abimelech first; now he rises from one against them. God had stirred the quarrel so both partners in the same wickedness would pay.

- Lesson. Beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God.

Judges 9:36 · Darby

And Gaal saw the people, and said to Zebul, Behold, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains. And Zebul said to him, Thou seest the shadow of the mountains as men.

Shechem crowned Abimelech king, then turned against him and backed a newcomer named Gaal — the ruin Jotham had warned would fall on both. In verse 36 Gaal's eyes tell him the truth, and Zebul's words talk him out of it.

The Misdirection at the Gate

Zebul was Abimelech's officer inside the city. So when Gaal spots movement on the high ground, Zebul answers in a way that keeps him standing there a little longer.

Early in the morning Gaal went out and stood at the entrance to the city gate. He told Zebul that people were coming down from the tops of the mountains. Zebul was ready to divert him, and told him he saw only the shadows of the mountain as if they were men. But Gaal was now intent on watching, and insisted that there were two companies of people coming from different directions.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Words Quoted Back

Gaal had come to Shechem talking big. The words Zebul throws back at him at the gate are his own.

Gaal then could be very bold in questioning, "Who is Abimelech and who is Shechem, that we should serve him?" This is only one piece of broken pottery fighting with another. The proud words fall from his lips, "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech." Then he issued a message for Abimelech to increase his army and come out to battle.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

When the taunt lands, Gaal has no way back out of it.

Then Zebul taunted Gaal with the reminder of his words, "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Gaal's Name Means

One writer finds the motive of the whole revolt in the meaning of Gaal's name.

We may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude." That is indeed the translation of his name. Such loathing drives people to throw off their loyalty to the very man they first lifted into power. But breaking free is another matter. Zebul, whose character throughout is that of craft, is Abimelech's officer to keep the city in obedience.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Israel Without God's Testimony

Zebul's craft and Gaal's ambition were only two items on a longer list of what was wrong with Israel at the time.

Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Internal quarrels, treacheries and struggles for supremacy troubled the camp of Israel when the testimony of God had left it. So did grape harvests that ended in drunken hilarity, and drunkenness venting itself in curses. So did the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul and the violence of Abimelech. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred; but the Lord, in His grace, caused a ray of light to shine in the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony, and we may say that with confidence as we pass through difficult times. Even if only one witness is left for God in this world, may we be that one — that despised Jotham, the last of all, but standing firm for God.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

A Rival Without Backing

The city that took Gaal in did not stand behind him.

The men of Shechem receive a rival to Abimelech. They receive him in a half-hearted way, and then thrust him out to meet Abimelech, who puts him to flight. The men of Shechem are still at enmity with Abimelech, so he comes into open conflict with them and overthrows them.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Curse Working Itself Out

Neither man at the gate controls this morning. Both are working out what Jotham had already said would happen.

Fire came out from the men of Shechem as Jotham prophesied, to devour Abimelech. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He caused them to curse Abimelech and rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo. At first he seemed to carry everything before him. But God had decreed his destruction.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast. Gaal's power was in his mouth. He asked who Abimelech was that anyone should serve him, and promised to remove him if the city were his.

- Blind spot. Zebul's answer at the gate was not a report but a distraction. He called an advancing army nothing more than shadows.

- Bind. Gaal had committed himself, and could do nothing else. When the taunt came, he had to fight on Abimelech's timing, with an army gathered on short notice.

- Betrayal. Shechem took him up half-heartedly, pushed him out to face Abimelech, and let Abimelech put him to flight.

- Background. Jotham's word stood behind all the craft and ambition. Abimelech seemed to carry everything before him, but God had already decreed his destruction — and God never left Himself without a witness.

Judges 9:37 · Darby

And Gaal spoke again, and said, Behold, people are coming down from the high part of the land, and one company is coming along by the way of the Magician's oak.

Gaal has led a revolt in Shechem and challenged Abimelech in public. Now he stands at the city gate at dawn, watching movement on the hills. Zebul, Abimelech's officer, stands beside him and says he is only seeing shadows.

What Gaal Saw

The verse is the second half of an argument. Gaal points once at the mountaintops. Zebul tells him it is a trick of the light. Gaal looks again, and now he names two companies and where each one is coming from.

Early in the morning Gaal went out and stood at the entrance to the city gate. He said to Zebul, who was with him, "Look, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains!" Zebul was ready to distract him. He told Gaal that he saw only the shadows of the mountain, which looked like men. But Gaal was watching closely now. He insisted that two companies of people were coming from different directions.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Diviners' Oak

One of the landmarks Gaal names is not neutral scenery. He traces the second company to a tree. Some translations call the spot a "plain," but the word behind it means something else.

Not the 'plain' but the 'oak' of Meonenim, that is, the Enchanter's Oak, or 'the regarders of times,' as the margin note puts it.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The oak carried the name of these men. Here is what they did:

An observer of times had his lucky and unlucky days. Nothing could be started without asking the gods first… Others read omens for the same purpose: to find out the will of their god. Their answers came from thunder, lightning, the clouds, the flight of birds, or the appearance of certain birds.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Boast That Set the Trap

Gaal's alarm at the gate is the price of an earlier boast. He had promised in public to get rid of Abimelech.

Gaal could then be very bold in asking, "Who is Abimelech and who is Shechem, that we should serve him?" This is only a case of one piece of broken pottery from the earth fighting with another. The proud words fall from his lips: "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech." Then he issued a message for Abimelech to increase his army and come out to battle.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Zebul answers the boast with the boaster's own words, and Gaal is trapped:

Then Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words: "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal had to gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Three Kinds of Men, Not One Good One

There is no hero in this scene. The man watching, the man lying to him, and the man marching down the hills are all cut from the same cloth.

Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Quarrels within, betrayals, and struggles for power troubled the camp of Israel. Grape harvests ended in drunken laughter, and drunkenness poured itself out in curses. Then there was the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the cunning of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the things that disturbed the camp once the testimony of God had left it.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Hand Behind the Quarrel

The split between Abimelech and Shechem was no political accident. God sent it.

God it was, who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was, who rendered again the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who rendered upon the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Revolt That Fails

Some writers see a larger picture here, starting from what the two names mean. Commentators differ on how far to press such readings.

Then there is the revolt of Gaal (loathing), the son of Ebed (servitude), and he opposed Abimelech. Something similar happened in the Christian world. Because Rome ruled in a domineering way, people revolted against her. They tried to overthrow the church power that oppressed them. But Gaal's attempt fails. He is overcome. Abimelech and his officer Zebul are victorious.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast. Gaal asked in public, "Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him?" That boast is why he now stands at the gate with nothing ready.

- Blind. Zebul called the advancing men shadows on the hills. Gaal saw them clearly only on the second look, and by then it was too late.

- Bound. He had committed himself and could do nothing else. Words spoken in confidence become chains when the test arrives.

- Backdrop. The landmark he names is the Enchanter's Oak. The ground already carried the name of men who read omens instead of asking God.

- Behind. God sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and Shechem. The quarrel Gaal exploited was the opening move of a judgment neither side escaped.

Judges 9:38 · Darby

Then said Zebul to him, Where is now thy mouth, thou that saidst, Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him? is not this the people that thou hast despised? go out now, I pray, and fight against them.

Gaal had mocked Abimelech in public, asking who he was that anyone should serve him. Now Abimelech's men are coming down the hillsides in full view, and Zebul stands at the gate beside Gaal and hands the boast straight back.

The Boast Handed Back

The taunt comes at the end of a short exchange at the city gate.

Zebul was ready to put Gaal off, and told him he was only seeing the shadows of the mountain, as if they were men. But Gaal was watching closely now. He insisted that two companies of men were coming from different directions. Then Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words, "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. They were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal had to gather his army at short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Words Too Big to Back Up

The taunt bites because Gaal had said more than he could back up.

Gaal could then be very bold in asking, "Who is Abimelech and who is Shechem, that we should serve him?" This is only a case of one potsherd of the earth striving with another. The proud words fall from his lips: "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech." Then he sent a message telling Abimelech to build up his army and come out to battle.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two Men of the Same Kind

Gaal was no deliverer. He saw an opening and took it. The men who had made Abimelech king now celebrated his rival.

Another man, Gaal the son of Ebed, was ready to take advantage of the situation. He came to Shechem and won over the confidence of the Shechemites. He was a similar character to Abimelech, aspiring to have all authority in his hands. To celebrate Gaal's promotion, the people gathered grapes from their vineyards and pressed out the juice. Then they went into the house of their idol, eating and drinking and cursing Abimelech. Such is the folly of men of the world.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Some writers also find meaning in the names of the men involved.

Perhaps we may see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude." That is in fact the translation of his name. It is this loathing that stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the man they first lifted into power. No wonder the descendants of the "wild ass" (Hamor) rebel against a yoke as harsh as the one they had put their own necks into! But escaping from it is another matter. Zebul, whose character all through is craft, is Abimelech's officer, there to keep the city in obedience.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

A Quarrel God Was Using

The rebellion that Gaal exploited did not begin with him.

Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in, moving the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the results of working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but they had no loyalty to him. So they were willing to remove him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Gaal's rebellion is one link in a chain. It ends with Abimelech dead, and neither side escapes.

Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham prophesied. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He caused them to curse Abimelech and to rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king in turn, to devour them and the house of Millo. At first he seemed to sweep everything before him. But God had decreed his destruction.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Lesson for Us

The whole ugly episode grows from one root: a people who had put their confidence in a man instead of God.

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable — and to beware most of all when it is a question of God's things.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Words. Gaal's bold question was his own. Zebul only had to repeat it, and it became the charge against him.

- Weight. The boast carried no weight. The quarrel was "one potsherd of the earth striving with another" — two broken bits of pottery, two men out for themselves.

- Wiles. Zebul's part is craft from start to finish. He stalled Gaal at the gate, then turned on him.

- Working. God moved the Shechemites against Abimelech. Both partners in wickedness reaped what they had sown together.

- Warning. The chapter's harvest of bitterness teaches us to beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God.

Judges 9:39 · Darby

And Gaal went out before the citizens of Shechem, and fought against Abimelech.

Gaal had won Shechem's loyalty and mocked Abimelech from a safe distance. Now Abimelech's troops are at the city, and two questions arise: how did Shechem's new leader get trapped, and who was really behind the quarrel?

A boast that left no way back

Gaal did not plan this fight, and neither did the leaders of Shechem who marched out with him. Zebul stood beside him at the gate and threw Gaal's own words back at him as the troops came into view.

Then Zebul taunted Gaal with the reminder of his words, "Who is Abimelech... that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Gaal, a second Abimelech

Shechem did not swap a tyrant for a deliverer.

Another man, Gaal, the son of Ebed, was ready to take advantage of the situation, and coming to Shechem, won over the confidence of the Shechemites. He was a similar character to Abimelech, aspiring to have all authority in his hands.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

So neither side here holds the higher ground. Gaal's own words show what drove him.

This is only a case of one piece of broken pottery fighting with another, and the proud words fall from his lips, "Would that this people were under my hand! Then I would remove Abimelech."

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The ally who was an informer

Abimelech's army arrived at dawn for a reason. The ruler of the city had been feeding him information while pretending to back the rebellion.

However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathize with Gaal, though he had clearly kept quiet. He sent secret messengers to Abimelech to warn him of what Gaal was doing. He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack the city in the morning.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Some commentators read the whole chapter as a picture of a later religious power, and Zebul's craft has a place in that reading.

Zebul's character throughout is one of craft, and he is Abimelech's officer, there to keep the city in obedience. He may well represent the show of holiness that a power like Rome knows so well how to use when it enforces its claims.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The fire already predicted

This battle is not a random breakdown of order. Shechem had already been warned that the bramble they trusted would end up burning them.

The cedars of Lebanon were to fall before the bramble's fire! In saying that, an element of prophecy appears. The men of Shechem and others began by putting their trust in the wicked upstart Abimelech. But very soon an evil spirit sprang up between the two parties. It ended in fire from Abimelech consuming the men of Shechem and their tower, and in the destruction of Abimelech himself.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The quarrel had a cause deeper than politics.

God it was, who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was, who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What is left when testimony is gone

Read as a whole, the chapter shows what fills a nation once God's testimony has left it. It also shows what God still looks for: one faithful witness.

These were the things that troubled the camp of Israel when the testimony of God had left it: internal quarrels, treacheries, struggles for power, grape harvests that ended in drunken laughter, drunkenness finding its outlet in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech... And if there is, as here, only a single witness left for God in this world, may we be that one. May we be that despised Jotham — the last of all, but standing firm for God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast — Gaal boasted that he would remove Abimelech. His own words dragged him into a fight he was not ready for.

- Mirror — Shechem traded one grasping man for another. It was one piece of broken pottery striking another.

- Craft — the man at Gaal's side was Abimelech's informer. Loyalty on the outside, betrayal underneath — that is how such power keeps its grip.

- Fire — Jotham had warned that the bramble's fire would burn the trees that trusted it, and the bramble too. This battle is where that burning starts.

- Witness — when God's testimony leaves a people, ambition, treachery and violence fill the gap. The call is to be the one person still standing for God.

Judges 9:40 · Darby

And Abimelech pursued him, and he fled before him, and there fell many wounded, as far as the entrance of the gate.

Shechem made Abimelech king, and then turned on him. The fighting came to a head outside the city wall. Gaal marched out, Abimelech chased him down, and the wounded lay all the way back to the gate. It reads like a plain battle report. Commentators press two questions. Why did Gaal fight at all? And whose hand drove the slaughter?

A fight Gaal was not ready for

Gaal had boasted that Abimelech was nobody worth serving. When Abimelech's men came into view, Zebul threw that boast back at him.

Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words: "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him that these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal had to gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself. He could do nothing else.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The rout, and the end of Gaal

The chase stops at the city entrance. What follows for Gaal is not death in battle but quiet removal, and then silence.

Abimelech had the stronger army and the advantage of surprise. He crushed Gaal's followers, and many fell wounded. But at this point Abimelech withdrew to Arumah, while Zebul drove Gaal and his brothers out of Shechem. This was in fact better for Gaal, since he would probably have been killed if he had stayed in Shechem. Nothing more is said about what happened to him after this.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The man who wanted Abimelech's throne leaves the story without an ending.

The meaning of the names

Some commentators read the two rivals as a pattern. A people lift a man to power, then turn against him. The names, they say, hold the clue.

In Gaal, the son of Ebed, we may perhaps see the "loathing" bred by "servitude" — that is in fact what his name means. It is this loathing that stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the very one they first lifted into power. No wonder the descendants of the "wild ass" rebel against a yoke as harsh as the one they had put their own necks into! But escaping from it is another matter.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

This is an application, not the plain sense of the text. Other writers stay with the history and draw the lesson from the events.

Winning the chase, still under judgment

Abimelech is winning here. Commentators see Jotham's word coming true in that very success. Fire comes out from the king to devour the men who made him. But the win does not save him.

Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham prophesied. Gaal the son of Ebed won the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He made them curse Abimelech and rebel against him. So fire comes out in turn from the false king, to devour them and the house of Millo. At first he seemed to carry all before him. But God had decreed his destruction.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The same writer follows the story to its end.

The power that makes Abimelech is not the power that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Behind the quarrel, a righteous God

Why were Gaal and Abimelech fighting each other at all? One writer traces the quarrel itself back to God, and calls that righteous.

It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought all their evil back on the heads of the men of Shechem. And we may ask, in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not. He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A dark page with one light in it

Taken as a whole, the chapter shows what a people become when the testimony of God has left them. Yet one witness remained.

Quarrels among themselves, betrayals, struggles for the top place, grape harvests that ended in drunken partying, drunkenness that poured itself out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech — these were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel, once the testimony of God had left it... And if only a single witness is left for God in this world, as here, may we be that one.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast — Gaal's loud words about Abimelech left him no way out; he had to fight on someone else's timing.

- Rout — the wounded lay all the way to the gate. Zebul then drove Gaal out, and nothing more is said of him.

- Rival — Gaal's name speaks of the loathing bred by servitude. That loathing throws off a yoke, but it does not escape it.

- Win — at first Abimelech carried all before him. But the power that made him could not unmake him; a woman's hand awaited him at Thebez.

- Hand — God Himself was behind the quarrel, and He repaid both sides. Even when everything has collapsed, it is worth being the one witness left for Him.

Judges 9:41 · Darby

And Abimelech dwelt at Arumah. And Zebul drove out Gaal and his brethren, that they might not dwell in Shechem.

Abimelech's men have beaten Gaal's followers in the field. He now pulls back to Arumah while his officer Zebul clears Gaal out of Shechem, and the revolt looks finished — yet the city that crowned Abimelech still stands, and Jotham's words are not finished with it.

What the Verse Records

The two sides now pull apart. Abimelech withdraws, and Zebul finishes the work inside the city. Gaal loses everything here, and one writer counts that loss as his rescue.

Abimelech's army was stronger, and it had the element of surprise. It crushed the followers of Gaal, and many fell wounded. But at this time Abimelech withdrew to Arumah, while Zebul drove Gaal and his brothers from Shechem. Actually, it was better for Gaal that they did this, for he likely would have been killed if remaining in Shechem. The account says nothing, though, about what happened to him after this.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Arumah itself is a small detail with no story attached to it — reference works can say little more than where it sat.

City or district apparently near Shechem, the home of Abimelech. Judges 9:41.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Champion Welcomed, Then Pushed Out

The rebellion breaks up inside the city as much as on the battlefield. One writer shows Jotham's words coming true in both directions.

The details show us how this prophecy of Jotham's came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech, and fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem. The men of Shechem receive a rival to Abimelech. They receive him in a half-hearted way, and then thrust him out to meet Abimelech, who puts him to flight. The men of Shechem are still at enmity with Abimelech, and he is put into open conflict with them, and overthrows them.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Names Carry the Lesson

The two names in this verse have been read as a description of what was really going on. Gaal's very name is said to spell out the mood that started the rebellion, and the outcome of it.

Then there is the revolt of Gaal (loathing), the son of Ebed (servitude), and he opposed Abimelech. Something similar happened later in the Christian world. Rome ruled in a domineering way, and people revolted against her. They tried to overthrow this church oppressor. But Gaal's attempt fails. He is overcome. Abimelech and his officer Zebul are victorious. The revolt has failed.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Zebul does the expelling here. Another writer weighs his methods across the whole chapter, and reads the detail of the story as pointing beyond one small town.

The story is told with such full detail that there is much more in it than the affairs of one small Israelite city; yet the commentators treat it as little more than that. Nor can we expect full light on it all at once... Zebul's character all through is craft, and he is Abimelech's officer, there to keep the city obedient. He may easily stand for the apparent holiness that a power like Rome knows so well how to use to enforce its claims.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how far to press a picture like this.

Arumah Is a Pause, Not Peace

Settling at Arumah left Shechem unpunished, and within a day Abimelech was back. His treatment of the city exposes what his earlier appeal to kinship had been worth.

Abimelech had not yet captured the city of Shechem. For some reason people were coming out of it the next day. He heard this and approached the city with three companies, lying in wait... All that day Abimelech fought against the city. He took it and tore it down. He sowed it with salt, so that nothing fruitful would grow there. He had told the Shechemites before that he was their flesh and blood, and had won their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Success on a Short Leash

Abimelech's early success was real. It settled nothing about how he would end.

Accordingly fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo, and he seemed at first to carry all before him. But God had decreed his destruction.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Shechem's earlier crime explains why God allowed him these victories. God, not an enemy army, then fixed the limit.

The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God used Abimelech's anger to display the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger. God brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Chosen — Shechem crowned Abimelech, then welcomed Gaal half-heartedly as a rival. Crowds that make a leader can unmake him.

- Loathed — Gaal's name means loathing, and his father's name means servitude. People who lift a harsh ruler into power soon turn on him.

- Expelled — Zebul, a man of craft, drives Gaal out. Losing the city likely saved Gaal's life, and the account says no more about him.

- Paused — Arumah is not rest. Shechem still stood, and the next day Abimelech destroyed the very kin he had once claimed in order to win them.

- Judged — Abimelech seemed to carry all before him. But God had already decreed his end. God used his anger to punish Shechem, then held back the rest.

Judges 9:42 · Darby

And it came to pass on the morrow, that the people went out into the field; and they told Abimelech.

The day after Abimelech put a rival to flight, life in Shechem looked normal again. People walked out to their fields, and word of it reached Abimelech, camped nearby. That small report ended in the ruin of a whole city. It also raises the question the chapter keeps pressing: who is directing this war between a king and the people who made him king?

The Field and the Gate

One writer follows what Abimelech did with that report:

The city of Shechem had not yet fallen, and for some reason people were coming out of it the next day. Abimelech heard this (v. 42) and with three companies approached the city, lying in wait. When he saw people coming out of the city he attacked. One company took the city gate. The other companies destroyed those who had come out (vv. 43-44). Abimelech fought against the city all that day. He overcame it and tore it down, and sowed it with salt so that nothing useful would grow there (v. 45). Earlier he had told the people of Shechem that he was their own flesh and blood (v. 2), and so won their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Taking the gate left the people in the field with nowhere to run back to.

The Man Who Called Them Brothers

Abimelech had first won Shechem by appealing to family ties. Another writer names what came in with him:

In Judges 8 we saw the people of Israel wanting to hand authority to their leader. Here a wolf takes the Shepherd's place and grabs the flock to eat it... He used the brothers of his mother, who was Gideon's concubine, to win over the men of Shechem by posing as their brother. They trusted this traitor. Their moral state was so low that they even forgot the bond that tied them to all Israel, and said of Abimelech: "He is our brother." For them, brotherhood had lost its true meaning. It had become only a label for one party.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Who Set Them Against Each Other

The split between Abimelech and Shechem did not start with either side. One writer says who started it, and why:

After Abimelech had reigned only three years, God intervened by moving the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the man's arrogance had become too much for them. But God meant both them and Abimelech to suffer the consequences of joining together in wickedness (vv. 23-24).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer puts it more bluntly, naming God as the actor at each turn:

It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who paid Abimelech back for his wickedness. It was God who brought all their evil back on the heads of the men of Shechem. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" No, He is not. He is very righteous.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Jotham's Words Coming True

Earlier, Jotham had said that fire would come out from each side and burn up the other. One writer traces how that word came true:

...the details show us how this prophecy of Jotham's came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and burns up Abimelech. Fire comes out from Abimelech and burns up the men of Shechem. The men of Shechem take in a rival to Abimelech. They receive him half-heartedly, then push him out to face Abimelech, who puts him to flight. The men of Shechem are still hostile to Abimelech. He is brought into open conflict with them, and he overthrows them.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Limit Set on the Conqueror

So Abimelech's victory served a purpose that was not his own, and it had a limit:

The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's rage show the justice of His own repayment. But when Abimelech tried to go further than that, God held back the rest of his rage and brought on him the miserable destruction he had earned. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and that curse came true.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Shared guilt. Shechem and Abimelech were partners in the murder of Gideon's sons, so both were marked for the same judgment.

- Division. God moved the Shechemites to turn on the king they had made — the first step of judgment was not an army but a quarrel.

- Ambush. One report was enough. Three companies, the gate seized, the city levelled and sown with salt.

- Kinship betrayed. They called him "our brother"; he destroyed his own flesh and blood — a wolf in the Shepherd's place.

- Limit. God used Abimelech's rage as far as justice needed, then held it back and turned it on his own head. Jotham's words came true to the letter.

Judges 9:43 · Darby

And he took the people, and divided them into three companies, and lay in ambush in the field. And he looked, and behold, the people came forth out of the city; and he rose up against them and smote them.

Abimelech now turns his army on Shechem, the very city that made him king. He splits his men, hides them in the open fields, and cuts down the townspeople as they walk out of their gate. Commentators press a moral question rather than a military one: who stands behind a slaughter like this?

The Ambush Step by Step

One writer walks through the ambush company by company. He also names who Abimelech was killing.

The city of Shechem had not been captured, and for some reason people were coming from the city the next day. Abimelech heard this (v. 42). He came near the city with three companies and lay in wait. When he saw people coming out of the city he attacked. One company took the gate of the city, while the other companies destroyed those who had come out (vv. 43-44). He had told the Shechemites before that he was their flesh and blood (v. 2), and so won their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Wicked Man as God's Rod

The men Abimelech ambushed were not innocent. They had shared in his earlier crime, and one writer sees God's own hand behind the whole thing — and a limit set to it.

The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's wrath show the justice of His retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his wrath, and brought on him the miserable destruction he fully deserved.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Winning Everything, Losing All

At this point Abimelech looks unstoppable. One writer shows that his early success was not the end of the story.

Fire comes out from the false king to devour the men of Shechem and the house of Millo, and at first he appeared to carry all before him. But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and the final victory looked all but sure. Then a woman threw a piece of millstone on Abimelech's head and broke his skull. God is not restricted to means. He Who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use the same kind of instrument here, when everything else had failed.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Violence Where Witness Has Gone

One writer gathers this ambush with the other betrayals of the chapter into a single list. He traces them all to a people who had lost God's testimony, yet he still finds one ray of light.

Internal quarrels, treacheries, struggles for power, drunken grape harvests, drunkenness that broke out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech — these were the things that troubled the camp of Israel. They came in when the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred. But Jehovah, in His grace, caused a ray of light to shine in the middle of the darkness.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Bramble You Crowned

Jotham's parable had already called Abimelech a bramble. This ambush is the harvest of that choice, and one writer draws the lesson about trusting man.

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly, and teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable, Judges 9 — and especially so when it is a question of God's things.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Another writer turns the same warning on us, and on any wish for a place above God's people.

Let us not be seeking a place. Let us not be like Abimelech. He wanted to step into the empty chair of the man before him — a chair his own father had refused. Let us not seek to be Abimelechs in any sense of the word. Whether it is one man or a dozen makes no difference. The principle is the same. Wherever there is a spirit of succession, wherever people think that certain men are rulers and will stay rulers despite anything in themselves or in the saints, you may be sure it is the bramble. It is what has no fruit for God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Crowned — Shechem made Abimelech king as their own flesh and blood. Here he ambushes and kills that same flesh and blood.

- Chastised — the ambush is God's government at work. He used Abimelech to punish men who had shared in the murder of Gideon's sons.

- Contained — God made Abimelech's rage show His justice. Then He held back the rest of it and destroyed him when he pushed further.

- Crushed — the man who seemed to carry all before him fell under a piece of millstone thrown by a woman. God is not restricted to means.

- Cautioned — do not trust the bramble, and do not become one. Whoever craves a place over God's people has no fruit for God.

Judges 9:44 · Darby

And Abimelech, and the companies that were with him, rushed forward, and stood in the entrance of the gate of the city; and two of the companies ran upon all that were in the fields, and slew them.

Judges 9 follows Gideon's death: his son Abimelech killed his brothers to seize power, the men of Shechem backed him, and three years later the alliance broke into war. Verse 44 is the moment the war turns, and it raises two hard questions: why did God allow it, and what did Abimelech win?

The Trap at the Gate

The attack in this verse is planned, not a chance clash. One commentator walks through the movements and then points to the irony in them.

The city of Shechem had not been captured, and for some reason people were coming out of the city the next day. Abimelech heard this and with three companies approached the city, lying in wait. When he saw people coming out of the city he attacked. One company occupied the gate of the city. The other companies destroyed those who had come out. All that day Abimelech fought against the city. He overcame it and demolished it, sowing it with salt to make it unfit for bearing fruitful plants. He had told the Shechemites before that he was their flesh and blood, and gained their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Quarrel Began

The quarrel between Abimelech and Shechem did not begin with either of them.

Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God intervened. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer for working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but had no sense of loyalty to him, so were willing to depose him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Word Fulfilled to the Letter

Jotham was the one brother who escaped Abimelech's killing of his family. He left a prophecy behind him, and the slaughter in the field is part of its outcome.

I will not go into the details. They are very interesting and profitable reading, and they show us how this prophecy of Jotham's came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech. Fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem. The men of Shechem take in a rival to Abimelech. They welcome him half-heartedly, then push him out to meet Abimelech, who puts him to flight. The men of Shechem are still hostile to Abimelech, and he is brought into open conflict with them, and overthrows them. They flee to their tower. He brings branches of these very trees — brings his brother's parable, we might say — sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God's Hand in the Slaughter

If God stirred the quarrel, is He implicated in the bloodshed? One writer answers by naming God as the actor at every stage — and refuses to apologise for it.

God it was who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was who paid back the wickedness of Abimelech. God it was who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. ... Modern teaching in these later days has produced a corrupted and soft religion. It flinches at the bare idea of God using His holy government to carry out justice. He goes on carrying it out all the same.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Victory That Settles Nothing

Verse 44 is Abimelech at his most effective. It is also the start of his end.

It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. In the story in Judges, the millstone is the cause of Abimelech's destruction; yet it is character that brings destruction from God.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A People Without God's Testimony

The chapter as a whole shows what Israel had become, and what God still kept alive in it.

Internal quarrels, betrayals, struggles for power, grape harvests that ended in drunken partying, drunkenness that broke out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech — these were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, slaughter, and hatred. But Jehovah, in His grace, made a ray of light shine in the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown — Shechem crowned a man who had murdered his brothers. God Himself stirred the falling-out, so that both partners in that crime would reap it.

- Sprung — The trap at the gate and in the field is Jotham's warning coming true: fire out of Abimelech, burning the men who lit him.

- Seized — He took the city, levelled it, and salted the ground. The man who called Shechem his own flesh and blood then destroyed it.

- Spent — The power that made him could not keep him. He wins at Shechem only to die at Thebez under a woman's millstone.

- Shown — Where God's testimony is gone, a people turns to treachery, slaughter and hatred. Yet God never leaves Himself without a witness.

Judges 9:45 · Darby

And Abimelech fought against the city all that day; and he took the city, and slew the people that were in it, and broke down the city, and sowed it with salt.

Shechem made Abimelech king; now he tears that same city down, kills its people and scatters salt over the ruins. Two questions follow: why he turned on the city that crowned him, and what the salt meant.

What the salt was for

The salt was aimed at the ground itself. The ruin fell on the very people who had first backed him.

All that day Abimelech fought against the city, overcame it and demolished it, sowing it with salt to make it unfit for bearing fruitful vegetation (v. 45). He had told the Shechemites before that he was their flesh and blood (v. 2) and won their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Salt in Scripture

Salt appears in the offerings and in covenants. It also appears in judgments, and this verse is on that list.

It was used in the grain offering, and in other offerings (Lev. 2:13), also in connection with covenants (Num. 18:19; 2 Chr. 13:5, etc.); and in judgments (Gen. 14:3; Deut. 29:2; Judges 9:45; Jer. 17:6). These uses powerfully declare the lasting nature of the truth that salt pictures.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

God had already warned Israel about salted ground. The New Testament picks up salt again, this time as a warning about people rather than soil.

In the same way, the Lord declared what would happen if Israel rebelled and fell under the curse. Their whole ground would be brimstone and salt, like the overthrow of Sodom (Deuteronomy 29:23). The New Testament adds the terrible picture of salt that loses its taste. Such salt is no use for the land or for the manure heap, so it is thrown out.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Jotham's parable coming true

Jotham had prophesied against Abimelech and the men of Shechem. Verse 45 is one half of it coming true.

I will not go into the details, though they make very interesting and profitable reading. They show us how Jotham's prophecy came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech, and fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem... When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees — the parable of his brother, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower and burns up those who had sided with his rival.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Sowing and reaping

One rule explains how Abimelech's story ends, and it holds for everyone.

In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when anyone uses such a thing for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of God's retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap: if he sows to the flesh, of the flesh he reaps corruption.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The power that could not protect him

His victory here did not secure him. The force that put him on top could not keep him there.

It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. Here the millstone reminds us of Babylon's overthrow. In Revelation 18:21 the New Testament takes up the symbol the Old Testament prophet used.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The one man who stayed out of it

Jotham took no part in the fighting. He left for Beer, a name that means "a well."

He cannot join in all this conflict and strife, so he flees to Beer and dwells there. Beer is "a well," and he dwells by the well, while the people of God carry on their ugly strife over authority. He drinks from the fountain of the word of God, the only place that gives strength and refreshment.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown. Abimelech used his father's reputation for himself, and what a man sows he must reap.

- Reaped. He levels the city that crowned him, destroying his own flesh and blood without hesitation.

- Salted. Salt marks a judgment meant to last. The ground is left barren, like the curse God warned rebellious Israel about.

- Spent. The power that made him could not unmake him; he prevails at Shechem only to die at Thebez.

- Spared. Jotham left the strife and lived by the well. He drank from God's word while king and city destroyed each other.

Judges 9:46 · Darby

And all the men of the tower of Shechem heard [that], and they entered into the stronghold of the house of the god Berith.

Shechem lies in ruins. The men of its tower need somewhere to hide, and the place they pick is the temple of their god. The verse asks the question the whole chapter has been building toward. What happens when the only refuge left to you is one you invented?

Nowhere else to run

These men were not inside the city. They moved only after news of Shechem's fall reached them. One commentator links their choice of hiding place to an earlier refusal:

But the men of the tower of Shechem were clearly not in the city of Shechem. When they heard of Shechem's fall, they gathered in a stronghold inside the temple of an idol, Berith (v. 46). What else could they do, when they had refused God as their stronghold?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A god named "covenant"

Their god carries the name Berith. Israel had turned to Baal-Berith as soon as Gideon died, and one commentator explains what that name means:

As soon as Gideon died, Israel went back to worshipping the Baals as idols, and above all Baal-Berith, which means "lord of the covenant." This shows Israel sinking to a covenant relationship with God that is not God's covenant at all. It is only a promise to serve the Lord that comes from the flesh. God's covenant with Israel was the law of Moses, but false lords promote a counterfeit covenant.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

So these men hid in the house of a covenant god, having already walked away from the real covenant. Another writer traces this Baal worship back to the company Israel had been keeping:

The worship of Baal was at least a sign of a covenant with the Canaanites, whose god he was, and the history here gives clear proof of an alliance with the pagan nations… The Hebrew word used for the "lords" of Shechem is an unusual one, and it keeps coming back (verses 2, 6, 7, 18, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 39, 46, 47, 51). That can hardly be an accident. It probably points to most of them being Canaanites.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Shechem, of all places

An idol temple standing at Shechem is not a neutral detail. This was the location where Israel had once heard God's law read aloud to them:

Idolatry and the reign of Abimelech go together here, as they do in the later fulfillment this history pictures. And Shechem, the very spot where God proclaimed His law, is now the center of falling away from Him.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The bramble's shadow

Jotham had already told them what Abimelech would be worth to them in a crisis. He pictured a thornbush offering shade. One writer weighs what that shade was worth:

The shadow of a bramble! In the heat of Palestine you could hardly imagine anything less protective. And the bramble invited them to trust in that, with the alternative of being devoured!… The men of Shechem and others began by putting their trust in the wicked upstart Abimelech. But very soon an evil spirit sprang up between the two sides, and it ended in fire from Abimelech destroying the men of Shechem and their tower.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The next verses fulfill Jotham's words to the letter. One writer shows how the fire ran both ways:

Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech, and fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem… When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees. He brings his brother's parable with him, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What a man sows

The men in this tower had made Abimelech king. Now their king is piling wood against their door. One writer finds here the clearest lesson of Abimelech's whole story:

In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anything of that sort is used for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If one thing stands out in his history above all, it is the solemn fact of God's repayment. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Refused. They refused God as their stronghold. So when trouble came, the only place left to run to was an idol's temple.

- Renamed. Berith means "lord of the covenant." It was a counterfeit of the real covenant — a promise to serve that came only from the flesh.

- Relocated. Their false worship sat on the very ground where God once proclaimed His law. A famous holy place guards no one.

- Revealed. Jotham had warned that a thornbush gives no shade. The tower proved him right. Abimelech burned it with branches from the trees of his parable.

- Reaped. The men who crowned Abimelech died by his fire. What a man sows, he must reap — that is the settled way of God.

Judges 9:47 · Darby

And it was told Abimelech that all the men of the tower of Shechem had gathered together.

Abimelech has just destroyed Shechem, and the survivors from its tower have crowded into one last stronghold. Word of that gathering reaches him — so where does a people who have rejected God expect to find safety?

A Refuge With No God In It

The tower was not inside the city, and the place those men ran to was a shrine. One writer notes where they went and why:

But the men of the tower of Shechem were clearly not in the city of Shechem. When news of Shechem's destruction reached them, they gathered in a stronghold at the temple of an idol, Berith (v. 46). What else could they do when they had refused God as a stronghold? Abimelech heard this and led his men to the location.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Name of the God They Sheltered Under

The god's name carries a meaning. So does the word this verse uses for the "leaders" of the tower:

Israel had once again fallen into idolatry and taken Baal-berith to be their god. The name means "lord of the covenant"... Worshipping Baal was at the very least a sign of a covenant with the Canaanites, since he was their god. The history here gives clear proof of an alliance with the pagan nations... The word used here for "lords" (baale) is unusual in Hebrew, but is "often found in the Phoenician dialect." The way it keeps coming back in this chapter can hardly be an accident. It probably points to most of these men being Canaanites, and it ties them to the Phoenician Baal-worship of Canaan.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The place itself makes this worse. Shechem was the spot where Israel had once heard God's law read out:

So idolatry and the reign of Abimelech belong together here, just as they do in the larger fulfillment this foreshadows. And Shechem — the very spot where the law of Jehovah was proclaimed — is now the center of the nation's turning away from God.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Burned By the Trees of the Parable

Jotham was Gideon's one surviving son. He had told the men of Shechem a story about trees choosing a king, and the bramble they chose promised them fire. Now Abimelech hears where they are, cuts branches from the trees, and the story closes on itself:

...they show us how Jotham's prophecy came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech. Fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem... When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees. He brings his brother's parable with him, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower and burns up those who had sided with his rival.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Shadow They Had Asked For

The bramble in Jotham's story had offered shade. That offer was the whole problem:

In verse 15 we see Jotham as a master of sarcasm and a man of prophetic vision. The shadow of a bramble! In the heat of Palestine you could hardly picture anything that gives less shelter. And the bramble invited them to trust in that, with the alternative of being devoured!... The men of Shechem and others began by putting their trust in the wicked upstart Abimelech. But very soon an evil spirit sprang up between the two sides. It ended with fire from Abimelech destroying the men of Shechem and their tower — and with Abimelech himself destroyed too.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Whose Hand Struck the Tower

Abimelech acted from spite, yet the burning of that tower was not only his doing. The chapter's own closing verses account for it:

The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God used Abimelech's anger to display the justice of His own judgment. But when Abimelech tried to go further than that, God held back the rest of his anger. God then brought on him the wretched destruction he so fully deserved. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and that curse came true.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why So Much Detail For One Small Town

Scripture tells these small movements in detail: the gathering, the report, the branches. One writer found that detail far too full for a local feud:

All of this is told in such full detail that there must be far more in it than the affairs of one small Israelite city. Yet commentators treat it as little more than that. Nor can we expect to gain full light on it all at once.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Refused. These men had turned down God as their stronghold. The only refuge left was a shrine of Baal-berith, "lord of the covenant" — a god borrowed from the Canaanites.

- Reported. Their gathering was no secret. The news went straight to the man who had just destroyed their city, and he came for them.

- Repaid. Abimelech burned them with branches cut from the trees of Jotham's parable. The prophecy came true to the letter.

- Ruled. Behind one man's spite stood God's hand in government. He used Abimelech's anger to repay the accomplices in murder, then stopped him and destroyed him too.

- Refuge. The bramble's shade gave no shelter at all. The question it leaves is simple: what are we sheltering under?

Judges 9:48 · Darby

Then Abimelech went up to mount Zalmon, he and all the people that were with him; and Abimelech took an axe in his hand, and cut down a bough from the trees, and took it up and laid it on his shoulder, and said to the people that was with him, What ye have seen me do, make haste, do as I have done.

Abimelech is at war with the men of Shechem, and here he shows his soldiers how to burn down the tower they are hiding in. About a thousand people will die in that fire, so the commentators ask what kind of man gave the order — and whose judgment was at work.

The hill he climbed

One dictionary connects the name with Salmon, and places the hill near the fighting.

Salmon is perhaps the same as Mount Zalmon in Judges 9:48, the Hebrew being the same, a wooded mountain near Shechem.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The trees were near at hand. Abimelech did not need to plan a siege; he only needed an axe and a slope full of timber.

A bramble in charge

His brother Jotham had already described him in a story about trees.

The trees elect a bramble bush to rule them. The bramble's answer is very significant: "If I am to be ruler, then you have either got to bow to me, or fire will come out and burn up all the trees, from the cedar of Lebanon in its height down to the smallest of them." It is rule or ruin.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

So the axe on Zalmon is in character. This was also a deliberate turn away from the man who raised him.

Abimelech did not only forget his father's example. He deliberately chose the opposite path of proud self-pleasing.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Gideon's example pointed one way. His son led a crowd up a hill to burn a tower full of people.

Carrying his brother's parable on his shoulder

There is a sharp irony in the material he chose. Jotham's parable had been about trees; now trees are the weapon.

When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees — brings the parable of his brother, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The words "do as I have done" gave the order. His brother had drawn the picture first.

The shelter that could not hold

The people he attacked had already chosen a refuge of their own.

When they heard that Shechem had been destroyed they gathered in a stronghold of a temple of an idol, Berith (v. 46). What else could they do when they had refused God as a stronghold? Abimelech heard this and led his men to the location. They cut down branches of trees and used these to set a fire. The fire burned into the stronghold and destroyed it, killing about one thousand men and women.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

They had made Abimelech king and then turned on him. When the fire came, the idol's temple gave them no shelter.

God's hand in the judgment

Read on its own, the scene looks like one strong man getting his way. The commentators read it as the settling of an account.

So the first part of Jotham's parable was fulfilled: fire came out from Abimelech and consumed the men of Shechem (v. 20), those who had made Abimelech king. This was an awesome judgment of the city and the tower of Shechem!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

And the limit set on Abimelech's success is as telling as the success itself.

The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to chastise them as they deserved. So God made the wrath of Abimelech praise the justice of divine retribution. But when he tried to go beyond this, God restrained the rest of his wrath and brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God used the man who gave the orders on Zalmon, and then judged him too.

Summary

- Axe. Zalmon was a wooded hill near Shechem. The weapon was whatever grew on the slope — an axe, and a crowd willing to copy their leader.

- Example. Abimelech turned from his father's path to proud self-pleasing. A bramble ruler leaves two options: bow, or burn.

- Fire. The branches he carried were the very picture from Jotham's parable, now set against the door of the tower.

- Refuge. The men of Shechem had refused God as a stronghold, so they crowded into an idol's temple — and a thousand died there.

- Reckoning. Fire from Abimelech consumed those who had crowned him, just as Jotham's parable said. God used that wrath to punish their guilt, then stopped him and destroyed him.

Judges 9:49 · Darby

And all the people likewise cut down every man his bough, and they followed Abimelech, and put [them] to the hold, and burned the hold with fire upon them. And all the men of the tower of Shechem died also, about a thousand men and women.

About a thousand men and women die in a single fire at Shechem, killed by the man they themselves had crowned. Two questions press on the verse. Why did they die in that particular building? And whose hand was behind the flames?

The Refuge They Chose

The people who died here were not caught in the open. They had run to the safest place they knew — a stronghold attached to the temple of their god, Berith. One writer traces what happened from the moment Shechem fell:

But the men of the tower of Shechem were evidently not in the city of Shechem. When they heard that Shechem had been destroyed they gathered in a stronghold of a temple of an idol, Berith. What else could they do when they had refused God as a stronghold? Abimelech heard this and led his men to the location. They cut down branches of trees. With these they set a fire that burned into the stronghold and destroyed it, killing about one thousand men and women. So the first part of Jotham's parable was fulfilled: fire came out from Abimelech and consumed the men of Shechem, those who had made Abimelech king.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The god whose temple they hid in had a name with a meaning of its own. And the place had once stood for something very different:

Israel had once again lapsed into idolatry, and taken Baal-berith to be their god. The words mean "lord of the covenant"... Idolatry and the reign of Abimelech are connected; and Shechem, at the very spot where the law of the Lord was proclaimed, is now the centre of apostasy.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Branches and the Parable

Jotham had told the men of Shechem a story about trees. It ended with a thorn-bush that threatened to burn everything around it. One writer watches that story come back on them:

The details show us how this prophecy of Jotham's was fulfilled to the very letter... When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees. He brings his brother's parable, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Fire on Both Sides

The parable threatened the king as well as the people. One writer traces what happens when people put a ruler in God's place:

The tendency of man's heart is to make another king than God, and to put leaders in His place. This destroys the use and blessing for which God gives the olive, the fig, the vine, and all His various gifts... Royalty comes naturally to the thorn-bush. It needs to give up nothing, but it has nothing in its gift but thorns. But worse would come than this. The fire of God's wrath would come from this side and from that, and destroy both king and people.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Reaping What Was Sown

Abimelech had built his career on his father's name. One writer finds in his story a principle that holds far beyond it:

In the case of Abimelech it is seen most clearly... In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when anything of that sort serves self and not God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If anything in his history stands out above the rest, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Hand Behind the Fire

A thousand people die and Abimelech walks away the winner. Reading the chapter to its end, one writer shows God using him and then stopping him:

The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's anger serve the justice of divine retribution. But when he tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger. He brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse, and it was fulfilled.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Refuge — They ran to an idol's temple for safety. They had already refused God as their stronghold.

- Fire — The boughs that burned the tower came from the very trees of Jotham's parable. His word was fulfilled to the letter.

- Both ways — The fire ran in two directions: at the people who crowned a thorn-bush, and at the thorn-bush itself.

- Harvest — Abimelech traded on his father's reputation for his own ends. What a man sows he must reap.

- Government — God used Abimelech's anger to repay Shechem for its share in murder. Then He stopped him short and destroyed him.

Judges 9:50 · Darby

And Abimelech went to Thebez, and encamped against Thebez, and took it.

Abimelech has just burned the tower of Shechem. The march on Thebez is his next move: one more city, one more siege, one more easy win. What the verse does not tell you is that this is the last thing he will ever do successfully.

The Man Who Marched on Thebez

Abimelech's career began with a name he had not earned. God had used his father Gideon. The son traded on that reputation for himself, and the chapter records what that cost him.

In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anything of the sort is used for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Thebez: The Same Method, A Different City

Nothing about this siege is new. Abimelech comes to Thebez to repeat Shechem: burn out the people who take shelter in the tower. That repetition is where God stops him.

Then Abimelech goes after another man to another city. There he is seeking to do the same thing, to burn out those who had found shelter in the tower. Then a woman's hand with a piece of millstone makes an end of him — weakness using a simple tool of daily labour, the daily humble work of a weak woman. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech, and all his power with him. It is done by the hand of a woman.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Victory Almost in Hand

Abimelech does take Thebez. The point is where his winning stops.

But God had decreed his destruction. Abimelech was fighting against the tower of Thebez, with the final victory all but certain, when "a woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use similar means here, when everything else had proved useless.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The instrument matters as much as the outcome:

Again a woman became the vessel of God's power, and a worthless fragment of a once useful millstone became the instrument.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Line He Was Not Allowed to Cross

The end of Judges 9 looks back over the whole campaign, including this march on Thebez.

The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the justice of divine repayment. But when he tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger and brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Shechem had made him; Shechem could not save him.

It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Both Sides of the Wall

The siege left no one on either side untouched.

City in Ephraim. Abimelech took it, except for the tower. A piece of a millstone thrown from that tower killed him. So the besieged and the besieger were all punished in their sin.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the Millstone Pictures

Shechem had made him; Shechem could not save him. One writer reads the millstone itself as a symbol:

It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. Here the millstone reminds us of Babylon's overthrow. In Revelation 18:21 the New Testament takes up the symbol used by the Old Testament prophet. There Babylon herself is pictured by the millstone, as the hard and merciless grinder of God's wheat. In the story in Judges, the millstone is the cause of Abimelech's destruction. Yet these two things are almost one: it is character that brings destruction from God. And the woman's hand — what is it but the Church of God? Her cries have gone up to God, and in this way she brings the punishment. The millstone and the woman's hand are complementary thoughts that complete the picture.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Borrowed glory. Abimelech built on his father's reputation but used it for himself. What a man sows he must reap.

- Repeated method. Thebez is Shechem all over again: same tower, same fire, same plan. That repetition is where God stops him.

- Interrupted victory. The city falls and the win looks certain. God's decree of destruction lands at the top of his success, not in defeat.

- Weak instrument. A woman's hand and a broken millstone finish what armies could not. God is not limited to the means men respect.

- Fixed limit. God used Abimelech's rage to repay Shechem. When he pushed past that line, God turned the rest of that rage on his own head.

Judges 9:51 · Darby

But there was a strong tower in the midst of the city, and thither fled all the men and women, all the citizens of the city; and they shut it behind them, and went up to the roof of the tower.

At Shechem, Abimelech burned a tower full of people. Now the whole of Thebez — men, women and leaders — has shut itself inside a second tower and climbed to the roof.

Where the verse stands in the story

Abimelech's plan at Thebez was the one that had worked at Shechem: burn the tower with the people inside. The roof they climb to in this verse is where the stone that stopped him came from:

Abimelech, confident from his victories, then went on to Thebez and took the city. But the people of the city escaped to a strong tower and barred it against him (v. 51). Again Abimelech meant to burn this tower, but he made the mistake of going too close. A woman in the tower (her name unknown) dropped a large millstone from the top of the tower onto Abimelech's head, crushing his skull.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A curse coming due

Earlier in the chapter a man named Jotham had spoken a parable against Abimelech and the men of Shechem. One writer shows the judgment falling in both directions:

Fire came out from Abimelech and devoured the men of Shechem. But when he thought to do the same to the men of Thebez, no fire came out from him. Instead, a piece of a broken millstone came down from a woman of Thebez and struck him a death-blow. The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the wrath of Abimelech praise the justice of divine retribution. But when he tried to go beyond this, God restrained the rest of his wrath and brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse, which was fulfilled.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Borrowed reputation, personal ruin

Abimelech traded on his father's reputation. One writer reads his fall as a principle, not bad luck:

In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anyone uses such a thing for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God is not short of instruments

Nothing had stopped Abimelech so far. The blow came from inside the tower he meant to burn:

But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, with the final victory all but sure, when "a certain woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had proved useless.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Weakness, not strength, ended him:

A woman's hand with a piece of millstone — weakness using a simple tool of daily work — makes an end of him. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech, and all his power with him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Walls do not keep a city

The people of Thebez trusted stone and height. One writer weighs what even a well-defended city is worth on its own:

Jerusalem may yet be rebuilt and fortified so well that people think no one can break in. The sentries may stay on the alert. The city may take every care against attack. But the hardest efforts of human strength and care will be useless unless the Lord keeps the city.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The tower that holds

The same picture of a strong tower is used elsewhere of God Himself:

"The Name of the LORD is a strong tower; the righteous man runs into it and is safe." The Name stands for Jehovah Himself. He is the place of refuge, of shelter, protection and safety for all who in faith turn to Him. In Him is our peace and safety. The Hebrew meaning of "is safe" is "set on high." So if we flee to Him and become His, we are lifted high in Him, seated in Christ in heavenly places.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Tower one: Thebez trusts stone and height. Walls hold only when the Lord keeps the city.

- Tower two: Abimelech trusts his run of victories. That confidence walks him under the wall.

- The blow: a woman drops a millstone, a tool of daily work. God is not limited to the means men expect.

- The principle: what a man sows he reaps. A reputation borrowed for self, not used for God, ends in ruin.

- The refuge: the Name of the LORD is the strong tower that never falls. Whoever runs into it is set on high.

Judges 9:52 · Darby

And Abimelech came to the tower, and fought against it, and he drew near to the entrance of the tower to burn it with fire;

Abimelech is at the height of his power, moving from the ruins of Shechem to one last tower at Thebez. The verse catches him at the door with fire in his hand — but who decides how this siege ends?

The tactic that had already worked

He had used this method before. At Shechem the people fled to their tower, and he burned the door down on them. His weapon came from his brother Jotham's parable about trees.

When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees. He brings his brother's parable, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One step too close

The verse turns on a single detail: he drew near. He had the city, and his confidence took him one step too far.

Abimelech, in the confidence of conquest, then went on to Thebez and took the city. But the people of the city escaped to a strong tower and barred it against him (v. 51). Again Abimelech meant to burn this tower down. His mistake was going too close.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

No shortage of means

Abimelech looked certain to win. But God had already decided how this would end, and He was not short of ways to do it.

But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and the final victory looked all but sure. Then "a certain woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had proved useless.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Older translations read "a piece of a millstone" here, which is why writers speak of a broken fragment.

The instrument God picked

The man at the door had power, and a record of burning people out of towers. What ended him was a tool from an ordinary day's work.

Abimelech goes after another man, to another city. There he tries to do the same thing: to burn out those who had found shelter in the tower. Then a woman's hand with a piece of millstone makes an end of him — weakness using a simple tool of ordinary daily work, the humble daily work of a weak woman. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech and all his power with him. It is done by the hand of a woman.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Note what God chose to use: a woman, and a piece of something already thrown away.

Again a woman became the vessel of God's power, and a worthless fragment of a once useful millstone became the instrument.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Fire that ran out

God had set a limit to this man. Earlier God used him against men who deserved punishment. When he pushed past that point, God stopped him.

The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the praise of divine justice. But when he tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger. God brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse, and that curse came true.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the chapter is for

The chapter began with people trusting a man. Here the harvest of that choice comes in.

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. That is true above all when it is a question of God's things.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Approach. Abimelech brings to the tower door the same fire that worked at Shechem. He took the tactic from his own brother's parable.

- Overconfidence. He had taken the city and the victory looked certain. His one error was going too close.

- Decree. His destruction was not an accident of the siege. God had settled it, and He is not limited in the means He uses when everything else has failed.

- Instrument. A woman's hand and a broken piece of millstone — a worn-out tool of daily work — ended the man and all his power.

- Harvest. Jotham's parable held both a prophecy and a curse. Both came true, and trusting a bramble brought a bitter harvest.

Judges 9:53 · Darby

and a woman cast the upper stone of a handmill on Abimelech's head, and crushed his skull.

Abimelech had murdered seventy of his brothers to make himself king. At Thebez he stood at the door of one last tower with fire in his hand. Then a woman no one names ended him with a stone she used for grinding grain. So who holds the real power in this story? And how does God settle accounts with a man like this?

The Blow at the Height of Success

The stone falls at the moment Abimelech looks unstoppable.

But Abimelech was a forceful man. It looked as if his cruel rule would be fastened even more firmly on Israel's shoulders. Then, all at once, deliverance came. Abimelech had taken Thebez, and the survivors there fled in desperation to a tower. He was about to set the tower on fire and destroy them. Just then a blow struck him down. And how? A woman threw down from the tower a piece of a millstone.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Punishment Shaped Like the Crime

The way he died was not random. It fits a pattern that runs right through Scripture.

the punishment is often of the same kind as the sin that caused it. Scripture gives many examples of this. Jacob deceived his father when the old man could not see. Later Leah's crafty father deceived Jacob in the dark. Jacob's sons sold their brother Joseph into Egypt, and they themselves had to come into Egypt… Abimelech killed his seventy brothers on one stone. He himself died when a piece of a millstone was thrown on his head… As we sow, so we reap.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

God's Hand Behind Both Halves of the Story

Two judgments run through this story, not one. A curse spoken earlier by Jotham also reaches its end here.

Fire came out from Abimelech and destroyed the men of Shechem. He planned to do the same to the men of Thebez. But no fire came out from him this time. Instead a piece of a broken millstone came down from a woman of Thebez and dealt him a death blow… The men of Shechem had shared in the wicked murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his anger and brought on him the miserable destruction he fully deserved. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and that curse came true.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Weakest Hand, the Humblest Tool

God used no army here. He used a woman and the upper stone of her hand mill — the tool she worked with every day.

A woman's hand with a piece of millstone makes an end of him. Here is weakness using a simple tool of daily work — the humble daily work of a weak woman. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech and all his power with him. A woman's hand does it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Pride Speaking with a Crushed Skull

His last words are not remorse but reputation management. He calls his armour-bearer so the record will not read as it in fact reads.

He could only call quickly to his armour-bearer to kill him with his sword. He did not ask this to escape the pain. He asked it so that people would not say that a woman killed him! (vv. 53-54). Such was the pride of this godless man. Whatever he was thinking, the Lord still used a woman to defeat him. The record gives no reason to admire Abimelech.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Millstone That Reappears in Prophecy

Some writers see the falling millstone as a picture that points beyond Thebez. Revelation uses the same image for the fall of Babylon.

It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. Here the millstone reminds us of Babylon's overthrow. In Revelation 18:21 the New Testament takes up the same symbol the Old Testament prophet used. There Babylon herself is pictured as the millstone, the hard and merciless grinder of God's wheat. In the story in Judges, the millstone is the cause of Abimelech's destruction. Yet the two thoughts are almost one: it is character that brings destruction from God.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Sowing. Abimelech killed seventy brothers on one stone. A piece of a millstone then killed him. The punishment matched the crime: as we sow, so we reap.

- Timing. The blow fell when his grip looked tightest, with the fire already in his hand at the tower door.

- Restraint. God used his violence to punish guilty Shechem. Then God stopped him and destroyed him.

- Weakness. A weak woman and a broken household tool ended him. The power that made him king could not unmake him.

- Pride. Dying, he cared only that no one say a woman killed him. The record says it anyway, and gives him no honour.

Judges 9:54 · Darby

Then he called hastily to the young man that carried his armour, and said to him, Draw thy sword, and slay me, that they say not of me, A woman killed him. And his young man thrust him through, and he died.

Abimelech grabbed power for himself, and the chapter ends with him lying under a tower at Thebez with a crushed skull. His dying concern was not his soul but his name — that no one should be able to say a woman had killed him.

Pride That Outlives the Man

The command to the young armour-bearer was not a plea for relief from pain. He was trying to edit the record of his own death.

A woman in the tower (her name is unknown) dropped a large millstone from the top onto Abimelech's head. It crushed his skull. All he could do was call quickly to his armour bearer to kill him with his sword. That was not to save him from suffering. It was so that people would not say that a woman killed him! Such was the pride of this ungodly man. Whatever his thoughts were, it was still a woman whom the Lord used to defeat him, and the record certainly inspires no admiration for Abimelech.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Weakness God Used

The stone that ended him was not a weapon. It was a tool of ordinary daily work, thrown by weak hands.

Then Abimelech goes after another man to another city. There he tries to do the same thing, to burn out those who had found shelter in the tower. Then a woman's hand with a piece of a millstone makes an end of him — weakness using a simple tool of daily work, the humble daily work of a weak woman. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech, and all his power with him. A woman's hand does it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same writer draws the wider lesson elsewhere in this book.

Notice here the lesson that is repeated all through this book. The way of power is the way of weakness. God will only use an instrument weak enough to give itself up into His hands.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God Is Not Tied to Methods

Abimelech was winning. Victory over the tower looked certain. That is the moment God chose.

But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and the final victory looked certain. Then "a certain woman threw a piece of a millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted in the means He uses. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had failed.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Jotham's Curse Comes Due

Abimelech's fire consumed Shechem. At Thebez the fire failed him, and something else came down instead.

Fire came out from Abimelech and devoured the men of Shechem. But when he planned to do the same to the men of Thebez, no fire came out from him. Instead a piece of a broken millstone came down from a woman of Thebez and dealt him a death-blow. The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been willing partners in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his anger and brought on him the miserable destruction he had fully earned. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and it came true.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Borrowed Reputation, Personal Harvest

Abimelech's whole standing came from his father's name.

In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when anyone uses such a thing for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything in his history that stands out more than the rest, it is the seriousness of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap: if he sows to the flesh, from the flesh he will reap corruption. And this is just as true of the believer as of the man who carelessly or lightly bears the name of the Lord Jesus.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sowing. Abimelech built on his father's name for his own gain. His end was the harvest of that seed, and commentators warn that the rule holds for believers too.

- Curse. Jotham's parable was prophecy and curse together. Fire from Abimelech consumed Shechem; at Thebez God stopped the fire.

- Weakness. God chose a nameless woman and a household grinding stone. All through this book, power runs by way of weakness.

- Freedom. God had already used a woman to bring down Sisera. He is not restricted to means when every other means has failed.

- Reckoning. His last thought was his reputation, not his soul. The order to his armour-bearer changed nothing: a woman still brought him down.

Judges 9:55 · Darby

And when the men of Israel saw that Abimelech was dead, they went every man to his place.

The chapter that began with a self-made king ends with an army walking home. One stone from an unnamed hand emptied the field. Why did a movement that looked unstoppable collapse the moment one man fell?

Kingdom Held Up by One Man

Abimelech's cause had no life apart from him. His soldiers' next move proves it.

With Abimelech dead, there was no leader and no reason for his servants to fight any longer. They all left and returned to their homes (v. 55). So, just as God had prophesied through Jotham, Abimelech destroyed the Shechemites, and a Shechemite woman killed him. Whether Abimelech or the men of Shechem, they all reaped what they had sown. Their gross evil recoiled on their own heads (vv. 56-57).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators trace the collapse back to how the throne began.

Abimelech's rule lasted only three years. It was truly a matter of man ruling man to his hurt. God could not bless a kingdom set up in such a way. Both Abimelech and the men of Shechem had left Him out of their calculations. Both came to a tragic end. Today men do likewise. They too will find that God will not be mocked.

Modernised from Eugene P. Vedder Jr.Original wording

Power Used for Self

Abimelech did not build his own standing. He borrowed it from his father. The warning here reaches anyone who carries a good name.

In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anything of the sort is used for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. And if there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap: if he sows to the flesh, of the flesh he reaps corruption.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Weakest Instrument

No army stopped Abimelech. A household tool did.

Then Abimelech goes after another man to another city. There he is trying to do the same thing, to burn out those who had found shelter in the tower. While he does it, a woman's hand with a piece of millstone makes an end of him — weakness using a simple instrument of daily, humble toil. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech, and all his power with him. It is done by the hand of a woman.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Character, Not Rivalry

The men who made Abimelech king later turned on him. Their hostility is not what ended him.

It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. Here the millstone reminds us of Babylon's overthrow. In Revelation 18:21 the New Testament takes up the symbol the Old Testament prophet used. There Babylon herself is pictured by the millstone, as the hard and merciless grinder of God's wheat. In the story in Judges, the millstone causes Abimelech's destruction. Yet these two things are almost one: it is character that brings destruction from God.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Where the Lesson Lands

Jotham had told a story about trees looking for a king. The olive, fig and vine all refused. Only the bramble, a thorn bush, accepted. Commentators read the rest of the chapter as the harvest of that choice.

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. This is even more so when it is a question of God's things.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The alternative is not a better man. It is reliance on the Lord Himself.

The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail. He is the true Vine, the Olive and the Fig Tree of whom Jotham spoke, in contrast to the useless bramble. Yes, all His people's need is found in Him.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown. Abimelech took the reputation his father earned under God and used it for himself; what a man sows he must reap.

- Struck. No army unmade him. A woman's hand and a fragment of a millstone did — it is character that brings destruction from God.

- Scattered. A rule with no root in God had nothing to hold it once its one man fell. The soldiers went home.

- Settled. Both the usurper and the men who crowned him reaped their own evil; God will not be mocked.

- Sheltered. Shechem chose the bramble, and it destroyed them; the Lord alone — the true Vine, Olive and Fig Tree — never fails those who lean on Him.

Judges 9:56 · Darby

And God rendered back the wickedness of Abimelech, which he did to his father in slaying his seventy brethren.

Judges 9 reads like pure human scheming: a rigged kingship, a civil war, a falling millstone. Then the chapter closes by naming God as the one who paid Abimelech back for killing his seventy brothers.

God behind the whole chapter

The chapter reads like a chain of human schemes, but the closing verses supply the missing name.

The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's anger serve the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his anger. God then brought on him the miserable destruction he so fully deserved. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and it was fulfilled.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The crime that was repaid

The verse counts the murder of the brothers as evil done to their father. And the murder was planned, not sudden.

His relatives gave Abimelech a little money — seventy shekels of silver. With it he hired worthless and reckless men to carry out his evil plans. Then, to stop any chance of opposition, he went to Ophrah and killed the other sons of Gideon. Only the youngest, Jotham, escaped by hiding. This awful crime of mass murder of his own brothers meant nothing to him. None of them had shown any desire to reign over Israel, but he wanted to make sure that none of them would.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God is not tied to any one instrument

Abimelech was winning at Thebez when his life ended. One writer draws out what God's choice of instrument shows.

But God had decreed his destruction. Abimelech was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and final victory looked certain. Then "a certain woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had proved useless.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

His last act was to protect his reputation, and even that failed.

All he could do was call quickly to his armor bearer to kill him with his sword. He did not ask this to escape suffering. He asked it so that people would not say a woman killed him! Such was the pride of this ungodly man. Whatever his thoughts were, it was still a woman whom the Lord used to defeat him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Grace forgives; government still repays

God "returned" Abimelech's evil to him. One writer places that repayment beside forgiveness, and shows they are not the same thing.

"Whatever one sows, that will he also reap." The sin of sowing weeds may be forgiven, but the reaping must match the sowing. The first is grace, the second is government. Each acts in its own sphere, and neither interferes with the other.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Some readers flinch at this side of God. One writer answers them.

It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask, in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not. He is completely righteous. Modern teaching has produced a weak, watered-down religion. It flinches at the bare idea of God using His holy government to carry out justice. He carries it out all the same.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A pattern that points forward

Abimelech is not the last ruler to grab power and fall. One writer sees his end as a preview of a larger one.

So it will be with the wilful king of the future, the blasphemous persecutor of God's saints. The Lord Jesus "will kill him with the breath of His mouth and bring him to nothing by the appearance of His coming."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Returned, not random. The closing verses explain the whole chapter. God's hand in government was behind it all.

- Returned to the guilty. Abimelech's murder of his brothers was cold and calculated. The verse says God paid back that exact crime.

- Returned by any means. A woman's millstone did what nothing else had done. God is not restricted to means.

- Returned, though forgiven. Grace can forgive the sin, yet the reaping still matches the sowing. Grace and government each act in their own sphere.

- Returned again one day. What fell on Abimelech points ahead. The wilful king still to come will meet the same God, and the Lord Jesus will destroy him.

Judges 9:57 · Darby

And all the evil of the men of Shechem did God render back upon their heads; and upon them came the curse of Jotham the son of Jerubbaal.

Judges 9 ends with a verdict, not a battle report. The final verse looks past the burning towers and the broken skull and names God as the one who was acting. Abimelech's crime and Shechem's share in it both came back on the men who did them.

God behind the whole thing

The chapter is full of human scheming. One writer names the real actor behind it, then answers the objection that follows.

It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God repaid on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous. The modern teaching of these later days has produced a weak and soft religion. It flinches at the bare idea of God using His holy government to carry out justice. He carries it out all the same; and before long we may see further striking expressions of it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A wicked man used, then stopped

A man can serve God's purpose and still answer for his own crime. The same writer shows where God drew the line.

The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the wrath of Abimelech serve the justice of divine repayment. But when he tried to go further, God held back the rest of his wrath and brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse, and it came true.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The curse of Jotham

Jotham had no army and no throne. One writer shows where his words came from, and how fast they landed.

Of course it is clear this was not honest dealing, but grossly wicked. So Jotham adds, "But if not, let fire come out from Abimelech and devour the leaders of Shechem and Beth-millo; and let fire come out from the leaders of Shechem and from Beth-millo and devour Abimelech" (v. 20). This was a prophecy God had put into the mouth of Jotham, and it was fulfilled only three years later.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Everyone reaped his own sowing

The verse names two guilty parties, and neither one escapes. The judgment fits what each had done.

As God had foretold through Jotham, Abimelech destroyed the Shechemites, and a Shechemite woman killed him. Whether Abimelech or the men of Shechem, they all reaped what they had sown. Their gross evil came back on their own heads (vv. 56-57).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The rule, and the means God chose

This repayment is not only an Old Testament idea. One writer grounds it in the New Testament, then points to the small thing God used at the moment Abimelech looked sure to win.

Righteous retribution follows in due course: "God considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you," and "if anyone is to be slain with the sword, with the sword must he be slain" (2 Thessalonians 1:6; Revelation 13:10). God had decreed his destruction. When he was fighting against the tower of Thebez, with final victory all but certain, "a certain woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not limited to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had proved useless.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A pattern that repeats

The principle in this verse is not tied to one hillside town. The same writer sees the same self-exalting spirit in a ruler still to come.

Now the Lord has declared that "Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted" — Abimelech proved the truth of it, and so will the godless counterpart of the future.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The warning left for readers

Abimelech's pride and Shechem's folly ended in the same ruin. One writer draws out the lesson for readers now.

The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable, Judges 9 — and especially so when it is a question of God's things.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown. Shechem helped murder Gideon's sons, then crowned the murderer. This verse is the crop they planted.

- Spoken. God put the prophecy in Jotham's mouth, and it came true just three years later.

- Sent. The evil spirit, the fire, the millstone: the text credits all of it to God, not to politics or bad luck.

- Stopped. God used Abimelech to punish Shechem, then restrained the rest of his wrath and destroyed him.

- Settled. Both parties got back what they gave. God brings down the man who lifts himself up — then, and in the future.