And Abimelech son of Jerubbaal went to Shechem to his mother's brethren, and spoke to them, and to all the family of the house of his mother's father, saying,
Gideon — the verse calls him Jerubbaal — had refused the crown of Israel and said the LORD alone would rule them. Now his son by a servant woman goes to his mother's hometown to seek that very throne, and the whole chapter grows out of that visit.
Abimelech means "my father is king." It says the opposite of what Gideon said.
He rises as king. Someone gave him his name — perhaps his mother, to show his link with the great man of Israel, and to cover the shame of his birth. That name shows how the subtle spirit was at work, whether it found expression or not: "My father was king." That is the very thing his father was not. His father refused to be king, and said God alone should be their king. And yet here is the son of his father declaring that his father was king. He declares further, in the strongest way, that his son also is going to be king.
This son did not appear from nowhere.
His enormous family and many wives do not suggest the spiritual vigour seen in men of faith, even in the days of the patriarchs. And surely Abimelech, son of the concubine, is too closely tied to this coarseness for us to miss the lesson. Ease and self-pleasing give birth to many a fruitful source of evil later on.
Refusing a crown is not the end of the danger.
It teaches us this. We may refuse a public place of exaltation and still have no defence against the most subtle and more dangerous snare: supposing that the memorials of our service can in any way add to the worship of God. This is using service as a way of exalting self, and that must "become a snare to us and to our house."
Abimelech's first move is not to Israel but to his mother's people.
Having cut off all rivals, he goes to Shechem, the town of his mother, the town according to nature. It matters that this town lies in the tribe of Ephraim, which is always, as you know, reaching out for rule. There he gets the men of Shechem to endorse him and recognise him as king.
Where did his power come from? Another writer points to his birth.
The sources of his power are that he is half Canaanite, half Israelite — son of Gideon on the one side, though son of the slave woman on the other. In this he is another Ishmael, and he carries the same symbolic meaning that the apostle gives to Ishmael in Galatians 4.
Here is the case he asks his mother's family to put to Shechem.
Abimelech did not only forget his father's example; he deliberately chose the opposite path of proud self-pleasing. He wanted to rule over Israel. He saw that to do this he must find a following that would reject all seventy of Gideon's sons born to him by his wives. So he persuaded his mother's relatives to speak to the men of Shechem. They were to ask which is better: that seventy of Gideon's sons should rule over them, or just one. He points out that he himself is their own flesh and bone. No one had suggested that Gideon's seventy sons should rule over Israel. Those sons likely knew that their father had refused the place of ruler. But a small minority can often force its way into prominence.
He moved as soon as his father died, and one writer names what drove him.
As soon as the judge, his father, was dead, he gathered his mother's family together and urged them to use their influence with the men of Shechem on his behalf. The glory of the LORD and the blessing of His people were not before him; he wanted to exalt himself — he would be king... It was by fair speeches that the son of Gideon won his way.
The chapter ends where such a beginning must end.
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble in Jotham's parable — and above all when it is a question of God's things.
- Seed — Ease and self-pleasing at the end of Gideon's life produced the son who opens this chapter; the ephod he kept became a snare "to us and to our house."
- Name — "My father is king" claims for Gideon the very thing Gideon refused, and stakes the son's claim to follow him.
- Kin — His first appeal goes to his mother's family and hometown: rule built on natural ties, not on God's calling.
- Words — Fair speeches win his way for him. The offer of one ruler instead of seventy rests on kinship, and no one had asked for seventy rulers.
- Harvest — Judges 9 is the bitter crop of that sowing. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God.
Speak, I pray you, in the ears of all the citizens of Shechem, Which is better for you, that seventy persons, all sons of Jerubbaal, rule over you, or that one man rule over you? And remember that I am your bone and your flesh.
reason: claim not in quotes; very hard sentences
The question — seventy rulers or one — never came from Abimelech's own mouth. One writer shows who he sent to ask it.
Abimelech did not just forget his father's example. He deliberately chose the opposite path of proud self-pleasing. He wanted to rule over Israel. He saw that this meant finding a following that would reject all 70 of Gideon's sons, the sons his wives bore him. So he persuaded his mother's relatives to speak to the men of Shechem. They were to ask which was better: rule by 70 of Gideon's sons, or rule by one man. His appeal is that he himself is their own flesh and bone.
Abimelech's question assumes that seventy men were reaching for power. One writer points out that this threat was invented.
No one had suggested that Gideon's 70 sons should rule over Israel. Those sons likely knew that their father had refused the place of ruler. But a small minority can often force its way into prominence.
The name Abimelech carries a meaning. One writer finds in it the sad slide of Gideon himself.
As Gideon grew older, his faith grew dimmer, and I fear his pride increased. His concubine, the servant woman, bore him a son, and he called him "Abimelech." And what does "Abimelech" mean? It means "My Father is King." The very place Gideon had refused in his early days, he now seeks to seize, and his son's name betrays his sad fall. "My Father" (that is, Gideon) "is King": sad, sad departure from the noble faith he once had. Earlier he had said, "I will not rule over you, and my son will not rule over you." Now he seeks the place of king.
The verse ends with a claim of kinship. One writer shows what kind of throne that claim builds, and why Shechem was the town for it.
He sets himself to rule over the people of God, and to do that he builds his throne on violence. There must be violence if there is rule of that kind; if there is the rule of man, it must be by violence. Therefore he kills all his brothers, all the many sons of Gideon, with a single exception. Having cut off all rivals in this way, he goes to Shechem, the town of his mother, the town according to nature. Shechem lies in the tribe of Ephraim, and Ephraim is always reaching out for rule. There he gets the men of Shechem to endorse him and recognize him as king.
No force appears in this verse, only words. One writer names both the method and the principle that finally caught up with Abimelech.
The Lord has declared that whoever humbles himself will be exalted, and whoever exalts himself will be brought low. Abimelech proved that true. Gideon's son won his way by smooth speeches. "His speech was smooth as butter, yet war was in his heart; his words were softer than oil, yet they were drawn swords" (Psalm 55:21). All this deceives the crowd and leads it away, as it led the men of Shechem.
The verse leaves a question for the reader. One writer asks whether we want the chair another man stepped away from.
Let us not be seeking a place. Let us not be like Abimelech, who wanted to step into the empty chair of the man before him — a chair his own father had refused… Wherever people think that certain ones are rulers, and will be rulers despite anything in themselves or in the saints, you can be sure it is the bramble. And the bramble has no fruit for God.
- Ambition. Abimelech wanted to rule, so he first invented a reason for Shechem to reject his seventy brothers.
- Invention. The rival he warned about never existed. None of Gideon's sons wanted the place their father refused.
- Kinship. His claim was not right but blood: Shechem was his mother's town, the town according to nature.
- Flattery. Smooth speech opened the door. Then came the murder of his brothers, because a man who seizes rule must keep it by violence.
- Fruitlessness. The man who grasps at a place others refused is the bramble — no fruit for God. Whoever exalts himself will be brought low.
And his mother's brethren spoke of him in the ears of all the citizens of Shechem all these words. And their heart inclined after Abimelech; for they said, He is our brother.
Gideon is dead, and his son by a servant woman goes to Shechem to build a following. Verse 3 is the moment the city's heart turned. No word from God won it. One claim of family ties did, spoken through his mother's relatives.
Gideon had refused to rule Israel. His son wanted the opposite, and he worked the one advantage he had in that town: family.
Abimelech did not just forget his father's example. He chose the opposite path on purpose, a path of proud self-pleasing. He wanted to rule over Israel. He saw that to do this he must find a following that would reject all 70 sons Gideon had by his wives. So he persuaded his mother's relatives to speak to the men of Shechem. They asked the men whether it is better that 70 of Gideon's sons should rule over them, or just one. He appeals to this: he himself is their own flesh and bone.
But look at the choice he set before them.
No one had suggested that Gideon's 70 sons should rule over Israel. Those sons likely knew that their father had refused the place of ruler. But a small minority can often push its way into power.
The three words that swung Shechem sound warm. Warm words can hide a trap.
Here a wolf takes over the Shepherd's place, and seizes the flock to devour it… To seize a place that was not his, he used purely human methods. His mother was Gideon's concubine, and through her brothers he deceived the men of Shechem under the appearance of brotherhood. They put their trust in this traitor. Their moral state was so low that they even forgot the bond that united them to all Israel. They said of Abimelech: "He is our brother." Brotherhood had lost its true meaning for them. It had become only the name of a party.
So talk won the city. That kind of talk splits people into two groups.
Now the Lord has declared that "he who humbles himself will be exalted and he who exalts himself will be humbled," and Abimelech proved it true. Fair speeches won the son of Gideon his way… All this deceives the crowd and leads them away, as it did the Shechemites. But the faithful few, "the people who know their God," are kept safe.
A heart does not turn overnight. The people who listened to Abimelech were not simply loyal Israelites making a bad call.
Israel had once again fallen back into idolatry, and taken Baal-berith to be their god. The name means "lord of the covenant"… The worship of Baal was at least a sign of covenant with the Canaanites, whose god he was. The history here gives clear proof of an alliance with the pagan nations… This word [for "lords"] keeps coming back, and that can hardly be an accident. It probably points to most of them being Canaanites, and it links them to the Phoenician Baal-worship of Canaan… Baal-worship and mixing with the Canaanites are certainly at their worst in the story of crime and bloodshed that follows here.
Once the city said yes, Abimelech needed money to move.
Treasure taken from the house of a false god kept this man's influence alive. The usurper appealed to the people's pockets, and he was not ashamed of the impure source the money came from. This silver did the devil's work. Baal's treasure took the place of the Lord's power. It gave the usurper the means to persecute and cut off the family of God.
Abimelech grabbed a place above the people. True leadership among God's people runs the other way.
The lesson of government, dear friends, is the lesson of service. He rules best who serves best. The true head of the people is the one who is at their feet serving them. Some bring the people the precious fruits of God's grace — the olive, the fig, the vine. These are the ones, and the only ones, who rule or lead the saints of God by their service.
- Ground. The city's heart was ready before Abimelech opened his mouth. A town that worshipped Baal and mixed with the Canaanites was open soil for a usurper.
- Word. In Shechem's mouth "brother" no longer meant the tie binding all Israel; it had narrowed to the name of a party.
- Flattery. Fair speeches carried him. The crowd followed; the people who knew their God did not.
- Harvest. Idol money paid for his rise. It gave him the means to cut off Gideon's house.
- Rule. He rules best who serves best. The true head of God's people is the one at their feet, serving.
And they gave him seventy pieces of silver out of the house of Baal-Berith, and Abimelech hired with them vain and wanton men, and they followed him.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And he came to his father's house, to Ophrah, and slew his brethren the sons of Jerubbaal, seventy persons upon one stone; but there remained Jotham the youngest son of Jerubbaal; for he had hid himself.
Gideon had refused to rule Israel, but one of his sons wanted the crown. This verse shows what he paid for it, and it raises three questions: where did such a man come from, why was one brother spared, and what did God do about it?
Abimelech wanted the throne, and seventy brothers stood in his way. One writer explains why a rule like his always needs blood.
He sets himself to exercise authority over the people of God, and to do so he builds his throne on violence. There must be violence if there is rule of that kind; if there is the rule of man, it must be by violence. So he kills all his brothers, all the many sons of Gideon, with a single exception.
What makes the crime worse is that there were no rivals to remove. The threat existed only in Abimelech's mind.
No one had suggested that Gideon's 70 sons should rule over Israel… Then, to stop any chance of opposition, he went to Ophrah and killed the other sons of Gideon. Only the youngest, Jotham, was able to hide (v. 5). This awful crime of mass murder of his own brothers meant nothing to him. None of them had shown any aspiration to reign over Israel, but he wanted to make sure that none of them would.
The murderer did not appear from nowhere. His very name — Abimelech means "my father is king" — records a change in the old warrior who had once turned the crown down.
As Gideon grew older, his faith grew dimmer, and I fear his pride increased. When his servant girl, his concubine, bore him a son, "he called him Abimelech" (Judges 8:31)… Once he had said, "I will not rule over you, and my son will not rule over you." Now he seeks the place of king, and his servant girl's son seizes that place at the cost of all his brothers except the youngest. Terrible result of their father's self-indulgence and pride — but "whatever one sows, that will he also reap."
Another writer looks at where his power came from.
The sources of his power are clear: he is half Canaanite, half Israelite — Gideon's son on one side, but the slave woman's son on the other.
The seventy died on one stone. One writer reads this bloodshed as a sign of a dark day still ahead.
Abimelech soon developed a thirst for blood — sadly typical of the dark day at hand. "He went to his father's house at Ophrah and killed his brothers the sons of Jerubbaal, seventy men, on one stone." How quickly Israel forgot what they owed to Gideon! A power that has abandoned God is always a persecutor of God's people.
One son got away. Writers note where he hid, and what he did with the life he kept.
Naturally, he first had to clear his way by wiping out Jerubbaal's true successors. But a remnant escapes into hiding at Beer, the "well" — a good place for God's refugees. That remnant is Jotham, who is still able to make his testimony heard against the usurper.
Abimelech's reign ended when a woman dropped a millstone on his head. Scripture ties that death straight back to this verse.
God is not limited in His means. The One who once sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use the same means here, when everything else had failed. "Thus God returned the evil of Abimelech, which he committed against his father in killing his seventy brothers. And God also made all the evil of the men of Shechem return on their heads, and upon them came the curse of Jotham the son of Jerubbaal" (Judges 9:56-57).
Later in this chapter, Jotham tells a story about trees choosing a king. The useful trees refuse, and the crown goes to the bramble, a thorn bush. One writer turns that picture on the reader.
Let us not be seeking a place. Let us not be like Abimelech, wanting to step into the empty chair of someone before him — a chair his own father had refused… Some think that certain people are rulers, and will go on being rulers regardless of anything in themselves or in the saints. Wherever you find that thought, you may be sure it is the bramble. It is simply that which bears no fruit for God.
- Seed — Gideon refused the crown. Then he named a servant girl's son "my father is king." His pride and self-indulgence planted this harvest.
- Ambition — The rule of man is built on violence, and Abimelech's was. Seventy men died, though none of them had ever sought to reign.
- Pattern — A power that has left God always turns on God's people. The stone at Ophrah points to a darker day ahead.
- Remnant — One brother hid, and that brother became the witness. God kept a voice alive against the usurper.
- Harvest — A woman's millstone ended his reign, and Scripture gives the reason: God returned Abimelech's evil on his own head. Whatever one sows, that he reaps.
And all the citizens of Shechem gathered together, and all the house of Millo, and went and made Abimelech king, by the memorial-oak that is in Shechem.
Gideon had refused the crown for himself and his sons, saying that God alone should rule Israel. One chapter later, the people he had rescued crowned his son Abimelech at Shechem, and the rest of the chapter shows what that choice cost.
The men who made Abimelech king were not the nation.
Only a small part of Israel's population gathered and made Abimelech king: the people of Shechem and of Beth Millo. The other tribes showed no energy to resist this arrogant seizure of authority. It may be that most just ignored him, for nothing is said of his even attempting to attract the other tribes to him. Yet he was considered king over all Israel.
The pillar in this verse was not a random landmark.
Joshua made a covenant with the people, and gave them a statute and an ordinance in Shechem. He wrote the words in the book of the law of God. He took a great stone as a witness and set it up there under an oak.
Crowning a murderer on that exact spot was not carelessness. It was open defiance, and one witness stood up against it.
Jotham's name means "Jehovah is perfect," and in that name he carries the character of a true witness. The men of Shechem, with shameless boldness, gather at the stone Joshua set up, to make Abimelech king — the man who had murdered his own brothers. There Jotham appeals to them from Mount Gerizim in the fable of the trees.
The name "Abimelech" means "my father was king." Gideon had insisted on the opposite.
He rises as king. Someone gave him his name — perhaps his mother, to show his link with the great man of Israel and to cover the shame of his birth. The name shows how the subtle spirit was at work, whether it was spoken out or not: "My father was king." That is the very thing his father was not. His father refused to be king, and said God alone should be their king. Yet here is a son declaring that his father was king — and declaring, in the strongest way, that his own son will be king too.
He reached Shechem over his brothers' bodies.
He sets himself to rule over the people of God, and to do it he builds his throne on violence. Rule of that sort must have violence; if man rules, it must be by violence. Therefore, he slays all his brothers, all the many sons of Gideon, with a single exception. Having cut off all rivals, he goes to Shechem, the town of his mother, the town according to nature. It lies in the very tribe of Ephraim, the tribe that is always reaching out for rule, and there he gets the men of Shechem to endorse and recognise him as king.
So what marks someone who is not chasing a crown?
The lesson for us in all this is that no believer and no people going on with God needs promotion. He moves quietly in the place God has given him, and his life, character and service speak for themselves. Ambition leaves such people cold, except the ambition to honour God. But a graceless, self-centred man is glad to take the flattery of foolish men. He climbs over them into a tyrant's place, and nothing matches it but the pride that comes before destruction. Christ, on the contrary, humbled Himself. God highly exalted Him.
Abimelech's story does not end with the crown.
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anything of that sort is used for self, and not for God, the result must be bitter disappointment. If anything stands out in his history, it is the solemn fact of God's retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.
- A minority. One town and one clan made a king for the whole nation, and the other tribes let it happen.
- The stone. They crowned him at the stone Joshua set up as a witness to God's covenant. The reminder of God's rule became the stage for man's.
- The name. "My father was king" claimed the very title Gideon had refused. Gideon had said the Lord should rule instead.
- By violence. Man's rule must hold itself by force, so the brothers died before the crowning.
- The reckoning. Using God's reputation for self ends in disappointment. What a man sows, he reaps.
And they told it to Jotham, and he went and stood on the top of mount Gerizim, and lifted up his voice, and cried, and said to them, Hearken to me, ye citizens of Shechem, that God may hearken to you.
Abimelech murdered his brothers and took the crown at Shechem. One son escaped. He climbed the mountain above the city and shouted down at the men who had crowned Abimelech. He asks them to listen to him so that God will listen to them. Then he tells them a story about trees.
Jotham speaks because he is the only one left alive to speak:
How quickly Israel forgot what they owed to Gideon! A power that has turned away from God always persecutes God's people... We read, "Jotham the youngest son of Jerubbaal was left, for he hid himself." God enabled him to bear witness. He "went and stood on top of Mount Gerizim" (the mountain of blessing; Deut. 27). There he told Israel in the most serious terms where they stood in relation to the man who had seized power.
One writer sees that single voice as God's own light in a dark hour:
Jehovah, in His grace, caused a ray of light to shine in the middle of the darkness. He does not leave Himself without a witness. We can say that again with confidence as we pass through difficult times. Suppose only one witness is left for God in this world, as here. May we be that one — the despised Jotham, last of all, but standing firm for God.
The choice of mountain carried its own message:
In the past Moses had ordered six tribes to stand on Mount Ebal to pronounce the curse and six on Gerizim to pronounce the blessing. Joshua had remembered this when the people entered Canaan, but since then Israel had in practice chosen Ebal, the place of cursing. Jotham chose Gerizim, the place of blessing, and he stood there alone. As God's witness, he faced the whole people. He lifted up his voice and spoke a fable in their hearing. It proclaimed the blessing of faith, and also what would follow from the people's unfaithfulness.
The crowd below had gathered at a place Joshua once marked:
Jotham ("Jehovah is perfect") carries in his name the character of a true witness. With shameless boldness, the Shechemites gather at the stone Joshua set up, to make Abimelech, the killer of his own brothers, king. There Jotham appeals to them from Gerizim with the fable of the trees.
In Jotham's story the olive, the fig and the vine are each offered the crown, and each refuses:
The tendency of man's heart is to make someone other than God king. People put leaders in His place. So they destroy the use and blessing for which God gives the olive, the fig and the vine — His various gifts. But those who are truly worthiest are the surest to refuse. They will not leave their places of happy service, their sweetness and their fruit, just to "wave over" the trees, fluttering in the wind above them.
Another writer explains what these three trees stand for in Scripture:
The fatness of it in man honours God and means power for worship towards God and for service towards others. Saints who grasp this highest of all privileges want no promotion. It is enough to be what God has made them.
Only the thorn-bush takes the crown, and it has nothing to give up:
The bramble had no beauty and no use. It was known mainly for its thorns. Those thorns showed the curse resting on the plant world as the fruit of man's sin, according to Genesis 3:18. It was quite willing to accept promotion and lord it over others.
Jotham asked Shechem to hear him so that God would hear them. They did not hear. One writer reads the end of his speech, about their dealings with Gideon's family, as more than anger:
Of course it is clear this was not truthful dealing, but grossly wicked. So Jotham adds, "if not, let fire come from Abimelech and devour the men of Shechem, and let fire come from the men of Shechem and from Beth Millo and devour Abimelech!" (v. 20). This was a prophecy God had put into Jotham's mouth, and it was fulfilled only three years later.
- Hear — Jotham asks Shechem to listen to him so that God will listen to them. Everything that follows turns on their answer.
- Alone — one hidden survivor stands on the mountain of blessing. That is all the testimony God needs in a dark hour.
- Fruit — olive, fig and vine all refuse the crown. Bearing fruit where God placed them is better work than waving over others.
- Thorns — the only candidate with nothing to lose takes the throne. The bramble can rule because it has no fruit to give up.
- Fire — what Shechem refused to hear came back as judgment, just three years later.
The trees once went forth to anoint a king over them; and they said to the olive-tree, Reign over us.
Abimelech killed his brothers to make himself king, and only Jotham escaped to answer the men of Shechem with a story about trees looking for a king. It raises two questions: why did the trees want a ruler at all, and why did the best of them say no?
The parable is not decoration. It explains what happened, and it comes from the one brother Abimelech failed to kill.
He sets himself to exercise authority over the people of God, and to do it he builds his throne on violence. There must be violence if there is rule of that kind; if there is the rule of man, it must be by violence. So he kills all his brothers, all the many sons of Gideon, with a single exception. Having cut off all rivals, he goes to Shechem, his mother's town, the town of natural ties… There he gets the men of Shechem to endorse and recognise him as king. Then his brother Jotham, the one who had escaped, puts forward his parable. It is most striking, and it holds the whole lesson of this chapter.
The trees take the first step. Nobody asks them to find a ruler — the wish starts with them.
Man's heart tends to make another king than God, and to put leaders in His place. That destroys the use and blessing for which God gave the olive, the fig and the vine — His various gifts. But the worthiest are the very ones sure to refuse. They will not leave their places of happy service, their sweetness and their fruit, to go and "wave over" the trees — to do nothing but flutter in the wind above them.
The trees ask the olive first. Its oil pictures something God's Spirit works in His people.
The fatness of the olive tree is the oil pressed from its fruits.
The Spirit of God would produce, and work out in God's people in daily detail, a character in line with the promise and purpose of God at any given time… The fatness of it in man honours God and means power for worship towards God and for service towards men. Saints who grasp this highest of all privileges want no promotion. It is enough to be what God has made them.
W. H. Westcott · W. H. Westcott
The fruitful trees refuse the crown, but God's people still need leading. The answer runs opposite to Abimelech's way.
Who, then, is to rule over them? If those who bear fruit for God will not be rulers over His people, who is to be the ruler? The lesson of government, dear friends, is the lesson of service, and he rules best who serves best. In real, practical terms, the head of the people is the one at their feet serving them.
Three fruitful trees decline, and the search ends with the one candidate that has nothing to give up.
Each had its own place in the scheme of creation and had no wish to be other than it was. The bramble had neither beauty nor usefulness. It was known most of all for its thorns. Those thorns showed the curse resting on plant life as the fruit of man's sin, according to Genesis 3:18. It was quite willing to accept promotion and lord it over others.
Jotham aimed the story at Shechem. The same test lands on anyone who wants a place above God's people.
What a lesson about what rule is among the people of God! How it searches our hearts as we think of it! It makes us realise how easy it is to become mere brambles. How easy it is to seek a place over the heads of the saints instead of at their feet… Do you want believers to look up to you? Then you are a bramble, if you covet that. The people others look up to are those who do not take the place. They are seeking to bear precious fruit for God and for the blessing of the saints.
- The wish — The trees look for a king. That pictures the heart's tendency: to set up another king than God, and to put leaders in His place.
- The cost — Ruling has a price. The fruitful tree would have to leave the fatness, sweetness and wine God gave it, just to wave above the others.
- The contentment — Those who grasp this privilege want no promotion. It is enough to be what God has made them.
- The candidate — The bramble says yes, because it has nothing to give up. It has no beauty and no use — only thorns that carry the curse of Genesis 3:18.
- The correction — Among God's people, the lesson of government is the lesson of service. The real head is the one at their feet. Wanting others to look up to you makes you a bramble.
And the olive-tree said to them, Should I leave my fatness, wherewith by me they honour God and man, and go to wave over the trees?
Jotham was the one son of Gideon who survived when his brother Abimelech killed the rest of their brothers. He stands on a mountain top and tells a parable: the trees go looking for a king. The trees ask the olive first, and it refuses. It will not trade what it produces for a crown. (The ESV says "my abundance" where older translations say "my fatness," and "gods and men" where they say "God and man." The writers quoted here use the older wording.)
The parable works by contrast: three fruitful trees turn the crown down, and a thorn-bush takes it.
The parable concerned four "trees": the olive, fig, vine and the bramble, or thorn-bush. The trees invited each one in turn to become king over them. The olive had its fatness, which brought honour to both God and man. Each had their own place in the scheme of creation and had no wish to be other than they were. The bramble had no beauty and no use. It was known mainly for its thorns. Those thorns showed the curse resting on plant life as the fruit of man's sin, according to Genesis 3:18. It was quite willing to accept promotion and lord it over others.
The word names something concrete: the tree's own product, and the place it already holds.
They ask the olive tree, but the olive tree is content with God's order. It represented Israel in its place of privilege. "Should I leave my fatness, by which, through me, they honour God and man." The fatness of the olive tree is the oil pressed from its fruits.
The oil itself stands for something greater. And the power it pictures comes with a condition.
Oil answers to the anointing and the power of the Holy Spirit, which brings honour to God and men. The Israel of God can only know this power while it stays completely separate from the nations and their ways. The nations set up kings over themselves (1 Samuel 8:5), while Jehovah was the only ruler of His people as long as they stayed faithful.
"God and man" is not a single audience. The olive's oil reaches upward and outward at once.
That fatness in a person honours God. It means power for worship toward God and service toward people. Saints who grasp this highest of all privileges want no promotion. It is enough to be what God has made them.
Notice who is missing from the olive's answer: the olive itself.
This honour holds no temptation for the olive. It gives a beautiful reply: "Should I leave my fatness, by which, through me, they honour God and man, and go to be promoted over the trees?" There is no selfish thought here. It is enough that God and man are honoured, and the one who bears the fruit is content to be left unnoticed.
The man telling this parable had a claim to rule himself.
Jotham could have claimed the right to rule the people after his father's death just as fairly as Abimelech. But he had learned that staying humbly with God, in the place He has given, is far more blessed than reaching for a place of dignity in the eyes of men. God does give honour, but not to those who seek it.
All three trees use the same verb, and that is the hinge of the parable. Promotion is not an addition — it is an exchange.
Please note that in all three cases they knew the place — the honoured place — God had given them. In each case they ask, and well they might, "Should I LEAVE." Here comes in a very important principle, which the young Christian will do well to remember. If you step out of the place God has set you in, you leave your power for glorifying God and blessing man. You gain nothing but loss and sorrow.
One writer follows this fatness back to its root, and asks who shares it.
In the fullest sense the root is Christ Himself. The fatness, that is spiritual enrichment, did not come to a man because he was born a Jew, descended from Abraham. It came because he shared Abraham's faith, and shared in the blessing that Abraham enjoyed. And this is open to Gentiles as well.
And the fruitful trees point to one Person.
The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail. He is the true Vine, the Olive and the Fig Tree of which Jotham spoke, in contrast to the useless bramble.
- Fatness — the olive's "fatness" is the oil pressed from its fruit; it is what the tree already has and already gives.
- Source — that oil answers to the power of the Holy Spirit, and Israel could only know that power while it stayed separate from the nations.
- Reach — the fatness runs two ways: worship toward God, service toward people. Nothing in the olive's answer is about the olive.
- Cost — all three trees ask "Should I leave?" Leave the place God gave you and you lose your power to glorify God and bless man. You gain only loss.
- Root — the enrichment belongs to those who share Abraham's faith, Gentiles included. The root, and the true Olive, Fig and Vine, is Christ Himself.
And the trees said to the fig-tree, Come thou, reign over us.
In Jotham's story the trees are hunting for a king, and when the olive tree refuses they turn to the fig tree. The offer is flattering, but the parable turns on what it would cost a tree already doing the work God gave it.
The parable answers a man who murdered his way to power. One commentator reads the whole chapter through it:
He sets himself to exercise authority over the people of God, and to do it he builds his throne on violence. There must be violence if there is rule of that kind; if there is the rule of man, it must be by violence. So he kills all his brothers, all the many sons of Gideon, with a single exception. With all rivals gone, he goes to Shechem, his mother's town, and gets the men of Shechem to accept him as king. Then his brother Jotham, the one who had escaped, gives his parable. It is most striking, and it holds the whole lesson of this chapter.
The search for a king comes from a pull in every human heart. The same pull explains why the best candidates keep saying no:
The tendency of man's heart is to make some other king than God, and to put leaders in His place. This destroys the use and blessing for which God gives the olive, the fig and the vine — His various gifts. But the very ones who are truly worthiest will surely refuse. They will not leave their spheres of happy service, their sweetness, and their fruit, to go and "wave over" the trees — to flutter idly in the wind above them.
The fig tree is not a random choice. In Scripture it points to Israel:
Sweetness and good fruit are what marked the fig tree in Jotham's parable. Israel was chosen as a nation among the nations to bear fruit for God, as Luke 21:29 shows: "Look at the fig tree, and all the trees" — the fig tree is set apart from the rest.
Among God's people the fig's work is to feed and heal, not to rule:
The fig tree pictures above all the gracious nourishment and healing that comes through bearing fruit for God. The fig tree produces sweet, wholesome fruit, and it says: If I am to rule, I must stop being fruitful. I would far rather provide food for the people of God than govern them. So if the Spirit of God has enabled someone to bear fruit that nourishes, refreshes, heals and sustains God's people — the gift seen in a pastor and teacher — who would trade that place for rank over them as master or lord?
The fig tree's reply in the next verse measures the crown against what it already produces:
In Jotham's parable, after the olive tree was asked to reign and refused, the trees asked the fig tree to reign over them. But the fig tree answered much like the olive. It was already bearing good fruit: should it leave this in order merely to wave its branches above the trees?
Promotion looks like a step up. The parable counts it the other way:
Each one said, "Shall I leave?" To give up fruitfulness in order to take a brilliant position was not really addition, it was subtraction of a very serious kind — it was giving up their true purpose in life, the only reason for their existence.
To stay a fig tree is to accept that people remember the fruit and forget the tree:
The fig tree is tried next, with "You come and reign over us." It replies, "Shall I leave my sweetness and my good fruit and go hold sway over the trees?" It is enough that its fruit has gladdened and strengthened others. The tree that bore it may be forgotten. Next the vine is approached… The bramble has nothing to leave, and honour tempts it at once. We know the sad end, the end that always follows, of such beginnings — both people and ruler destroy each other.
Many believers look for a strong leader to settle their troubles. This parable questions that hope:
It was a lump of figs that gave healing and recovery to King Hezekiah. Jotham's parable may well teach us that leadership is not necessarily the answer to the troubles among the saints. Past times have proved this. Goodness and sweetness are features that were seen in Christ. Perhaps unknown believers who live near the Lord and show these traits are better equipped to bring healing and recovery among the saints.
- Invitation. The trees ask the fig tree to reign. The olive has already refused the same offer, and the askers want a king instead of God.
- Cost. Saying yes means leaving sweetness and good fruit behind. That is not a step up but a subtraction from the tree's whole reason for existing.
- Sweetness. The fig gives nourishment and healing to God's people. Commentators link it with Israel, chosen to bear fruit, and with service that feeds instead of ruling.
- Obscurity. People enjoy the fruit and forget the tree. The worthiest are content with that, and it is why they refuse the crown.
- Bramble. The one with nothing to lose takes the throne, and ruler and people destroy each other. Leadership alone was never the cure for Shechem's troubles.
But the fig-tree said to them, Should I leave my sweetness, and my good fruit, and go to wave over the trees?
Gideon's son Jotham told this story when Abimelech seized power. In it the trees go looking for a king — and the fig tree, asked to rule, says no.
The fig tree's refusal is one answer out of four, and the last answer decides the story.
In the book of Judges we read an interesting story told by Jotham, Gideon's son. As far as I know it is the first "parable" in the Bible. He spoke of the trees choosing a king. In his story they asked four trees in turn to become king: the olive, fig tree, vine and bramble (Judges 9:8-15). It was the bramble who accepted the position, but on his terms. It was a picture of the wilful Abimelech, who seized the power and came to a bad end.
Each of the first three trees names something it already produces. The fourth names nothing, because it has nothing.
The olive had its richness, which honoured both God and man. The fig tree had its sweetness and good fruit. The vine had its wine which cheered God and man. Each had their own place in the scheme of creation and had no wish to be other than they were. The bramble had neither beauty nor usefulness. It was known mostly for its thorns. They displayed the curse resting on the plant creation as the fruit of man's sin, according to Genesis 3:18. It was quite willing to accept promotion and lord it over others.
Why would a tree with good fruit want a crown? Older translations word the offer as being "promoted over the trees."
God does give honour, but not to those who seek it... The trees try the fig tree next: "Come and reign over us." It replies, "Should I leave my sweetness and my good fruit and go hold sway over the trees?" Its fruit has gladdened and strengthened others. That is enough. The tree that bore it may be forgotten. The bramble has nothing to leave, and honour tempts it easily. We know the sad end, the unchanging end, of such beginnings: both people and ruler destroy each other.
Some commentators read the fruitful trees as pictures of Israel under God's blessing. The fig tree's fruit then stands for something Israel could only keep on one condition.
The fig tree said: "Should I leave my sweetness and my good fruit...?" (v. 11). Israel could only bear fruit when separated from the nations.
The same two words turn up again in the Gospels, on a tree with no fruit at all.
Sweetness and good fruit are what marked the fig tree in Jotham's parable. God chose Israel as a nation among the nations to bear fruit for Him. Luke 21:29 shows this: "Look at the fig tree, and all the trees." The fig tree stands apart from the rest. Our Lord cursing the barren fig tree shows how Israel failed to respond to all God's goodness.
Many assume a troubled group of believers mainly needs a strong leader. One writer draws a different lesson from the fig tree.
We have noted that it was a cake of figs that gave healing and recovery to Hezekiah. Jotham's parable may well teach us this: leadership is not necessarily the answer to the troubles among the saints... As we think of goodness and sweetness, these are features that were seen in Christ. Perhaps unnoticed believers are better equipped to bring healing and recovery among the saints. They live near the Lord and show these traits. We recall the words of the Lord: "whoever would be first among you must be slave of all" (Mark 10:44).
So where does such sweetness come from? One writer looks first at the life of Christ.
How precious was the fruit He bore when down here! Richness, sweetness, and cheer marked all His lovely ways. It gladdened the hearts of God and man. Our loving Father wants some of this divine beauty to reappear in the lives of His children. Let us also remember this: the very spot where God has placed us is where we are to show the fruit. Our sphere may be lowly and unnoticed. Even so, let us not think we could be more fruitful elsewhere.
- Place. Each fruitful tree had its own place in creation and no wish to be anything else. For the fig tree, that place was sweetness and good fruit.
- Fruit. The fig tree weighs fruit against promotion. Better to be forgotten, it decides, while others are fed.
- Separation. If the trees picture Israel, then Israel could bear fruit only while it stayed separate from the nations.
- Barrenness. The tree known for sweetness is the same tree later found bare. The Lord cursed that barren fig tree.
- Christ. Sweetness marked Him, and it shows again in believers right where God has placed them. Only the bramble wanted a higher post.
Then said the trees to the vine, Come thou, reign over us.
Jotham has escaped the killing of his brothers and is shouting a story down from Mount Gerizim at the men who have just crowned Abimelech king. In his story the trees pass a crown from tree to tree, and here it reaches the vine.
The parable opens with trees hunting for a ruler. Shechem had just done the same. One writer names the strange double instinct behind that search:
People feel their need of rule. Yet once rule is in place, nothing rebels against it like the human heart.
Jotham's stand on the mountain and the trees he names both look past his own day. These three trees are the images Scripture returns to again and again for Israel:
He was able to bear testimony: he went and stood on the top of Mount Gerizim, the mountain of blessing, and solemnly set before Israel where they stood in relation to the man who had seized power. In his speech he brings forward, one after another, the three trees that Scripture constantly uses as emblems of the Jewish nation: the olive, the fig tree, and the vine. All three refused the rule they were offered. The bramble took it, in the person of Abimelech. So Jotham is a picture of those among the Jewish people who will be persecuted for their testimony, but who will be kept by a faithful God right through to the end.
Each tree in the parable carries its own idea, and the vine's is distinct from the other two. Its produce goes upward before it goes outward:
The great thought of the vine is that it supplies wine, which cheers the heart of God and man. The olive pictures something else: the blessing of God to man, seen in its rich root and fatness. The fig tree pictures something else again: Israel's special place among the nations, bearing fruit for God as a nation. The vine has its own thought attached to it: cheer for GOD, as well as for man. It is not so much the blessing of God to man as the response to GOD. Wherever there is response to God, man is blessed in making the response.
Of the three trees, the vine looks the least impressive. That makes its reply sharper, not weaker:
The vine was still more lowly and weak, but it was producing the grapes that made wine to cheer both God and man. Exchanging this just to flaunt its own pride over others had no appeal to the vine.
His parable carries one settled principle, and his own life backs it up:
Jotham, son of Jerubbaal, gives wise and timely counsel: fruitfulness is better than honour, and pleasing the Lord is better than a great name among men. Jotham could have claimed the rule after his father's death as fairly as Abimelech. But he had learned that to stay humbly with God, in the place He has given, is far more blessed than to reach for a path of dignity in the sight of men. God does give honour, but not to those who seek it.
This has a direct use for anyone who thinks their life would count for more somewhere else:
Fruit is Christ reproduced in our ways. It is not a matter of gift, by which one may preach or work; some have such gift and some do not, but all may bear fruit. Let us also remember that the very place where God has put us is the exact spot where the fruit should show. However lowly and unnoticed the place God calls us to move in, let us not think we could be more fruitful elsewhere.
Jotham's trees all decline, and Shechem ends up with a thorn bush for a king. Writers point beyond the parable to the One who answers to all three of the good trees at once:
The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail. He is the true Vine, the Olive and the Fig Tree that Jotham spoke of, in contrast to the useless bramble. Yes, all His people's need is found in Him.
- Demand. The trees go from tree to tree looking for a ruler. They picture a people who feel their need of rule, then rebel once they have it.
- Gift. The vine already holds what a crown cannot give: wine that cheers God and man. It pictures a response that goes up to God first.
- Refusal. The lowliest of the three trees answers most clearly. It will not trade real fruit for a place above the others.
- Principle. Fruitfulness beats honour. Pleasing the Lord beats a good name among men. God gives honour, but not to those who chase it.
- Place. Your fruit is meant to appear where God has already placed you. Christ, the true Vine, is where that fruit comes from.
And the vine said to them, Should I leave my new wine, which cheers God and man, and go to wave over the trees?
Jotham tells a story about trees looking for a king. The vine refuses the crown, and its answer raises the question of this verse: how can wine cheer God?
Four plants appear in the story. Each answer turns on what that plant already produces:
The parable concerned four "trees": the olive, fig, vine and the bramble, or thorn bush. The trees invited each one in turn to become king over them. The olive had its fatness, which honoured both God and man. The fig tree had its sweetness and good fruit. The vine had its wine which cheered God and man. Each had their own place in the scheme of creation and had no wish to be other than they were. The bramble had neither beauty nor usefulness. It was known mainly for its thorns. Those thorns showed the curse resting on plant life as the fruit of man's sin, according to Genesis 3:18. It was quite willing to accept promotion and lord it over others.
The claim that wine gladdens God puzzles readers. One commentator answers from the olive's earlier reply, where oil honours God and man:
The explanation is easy for anyone who will look at verse 9. Clearly it points to the use of oil and wine in the offerings to God. They had just as much place in the honour, service, and social life of man.
Others read the phrase as gladness shared between the two parties named:
New wine is the joy found in the shared communion of men with God. No enjoyment is higher. Israel lost it when they adopted the spirit and ways of the nations.
The offerings gave that gladness a fixed daily place:
From the day the Aaronic priesthood was fully established, not one day was to pass without a drink offering. It went with the morning and evening burnt offering. Every day the bronze altar held something offered in picture that could cheer the heart of anyone who understood it. And now we are taught what the drink offering was to consist of: strong wine, poured out to the Lord. For wine it is, as Jotham says in his parable, "which cheers God and man." And surely the altar held in picture what was well fitted to do this — the lamb of the burnt offering. It foreshadowed the perfect surrender of the Lord Jesus Christ to do His Father's will.
Israel itself is God's vine. What did He find when He came for its wine?
In the Scriptures, wine speaks of earthly joy, and God sought that joy from His earthly people, Israel. Isaiah 5 compares Israel to a vine. Verse 2 of that chapter tells all that God did so that it would bear fruit. He had done everything that could be done. Yet when He came to taste the fruit, there was no wine for Him. He could have no joy in His earthly people.
The vine will not trade what it yields for a place above the others. The same choice faces Christians:
What a lesson for us Christians! The world is to the church what the nations were to Israel. If we give in to its requests, we abandon our oil, our fruit, our new wine. That is, we give up our spiritual power, the works which God has prepared for us, and the joy of communion. Oh, can we answer every offer of the world like this? Should I leave what is my happiness and my strength? Should I trade it for fruitless turmoil, or to satisfy the desires and ambitions of men's hearts?
Jotham himself had a claim to his father's place and did not press it:
Jotham had as fair a claim as Abimelech to rule the people after his father's death. But he had learned something better. To stay humbly with God, in the place He may have given, is far more blessed than to aim at a path of dignity in the sight of men. God does give honour, but not to those who seek it.
The lowliness of the plant is itself part of the picture:
The vine is a lowly plant, dependent and clinging. It is content with God's order… It yields wine and has its place in giving gladness to God and man. Christ is the lowly man of God's pleasure, the true vine, yielding fruit for the Father, always doing the things that please Him. Saints too remain in Christ, live by His life, are fed by His love, and quietly express that life in fruit.
- Fruit first. The olive has fatness, the fig sweetness, the vine wine. The bramble has only thorns, and thorns show the curse.
- Joy shared. Wine here is gladness God and man share. Israel lost that joy when they took up the ways of the nations.
- Joy poured out. The daily drink offering set wine on the altar beside the lamb. It pictured Christ's perfect surrender to His Father's will.
- Joy withheld. God looked for wine from His own vine, Israel, and found none. He could take no joy in His earthly people.
- Joy kept. The vine refuses promotion; the trade would cost it its fruit. God gives honour, but not to those who look for it.
Then said all the trees to the thorn-bush, Come thou, reign over us.
Three trees have already refused the crown, and now the whole forest offers the throne to the bramble — a thorn-bush with no fruit at all. Jotham is showing the men of Shechem what they did when they made Abimelech king.
Why did the trees not simply stop asking? One writer traces it to something in the human heart:
The tendency of man's heart is to make another king than God, and to put leaders in His place. In doing so it destroys the use and blessing for which God gives the olive, the fig, the vine, and all His various gifts. But those who are truly worthiest will certainly refuse to leave their places of happy service, their sweetness, and their fruit. They will not go to "wave over" the trees — to flutter idly in the wind above them. So royalty comes naturally to the thorn-bush, which need give up nothing, but which has nothing in its gift but thorns.
The refusals did not change the trees' minds. They only changed their standards.
They ask the Bramble. They are stubborn in their wrongdoing, and these refusals do not stop them. Because they are determined to have a king, they find that God in anger may give them one, and take him away in His wrath. Their choice may turn out to be one of the basest of men. The trees could only accept the bramble's authority over them by putting themselves down.
The olive, fig and vine each had something to lose by taking the throne. The bramble did not, and that is exactly why it said yes.
The olive had its fatness by which both God and man were honoured. The fig tree had its sweetness and good fruit. The vine had its wine which cheered God and man. Each had their own place in the scheme of creation and had no wish to be other than they were. The bramble had neither beauty nor usefulness. It was known mainly for its thorns. Those thorns showed the curse resting on the plant creation as the fruit of man's sin, according to Genesis 3:18. It was quite willing to accept promotion and lord it over others.
Emptiness, not ability, is what leaves a man free to grab a position.
The three trees Jotham names carry a settled meaning in Scripture, and the bramble had a name and a face:
In his speech he brings forward in turn the three trees that Scripture uses again and again as emblems of the Jewish nation: the olive, the fig tree, and the vine. All of them turned down the rule they were offered. The bramble accepted it at last, in the person of Abimelech.
The same writer sees this pattern reaching far beyond Abimelech:
The devil himself will one day lift up a man — the political antichrist — as the puppet of his own ambition. He will give him his power, his throne, and great authority. Yet in God's picture of him (Revelation 13) he is only a beast. But with what result? Only the destruction of the puppet and of all who trust in him, and the final confusion and overthrow of Satan himself. The Shechemites of our chapter find out in the long run that their choice becomes their affliction and punishment.
The application is not only political. Where fruitfulness declines to lead, something fruitless will offer to.
If those who are bearing fruit for God will not be rulers over His people, who really is to be the ruler? The lesson of government is the lesson of service, and he rules best who serves best.
And the warning cuts inward before it cuts outward:
How this lesson searches our hearts, as we think of it! It makes us realise how easy it is to become mere brambles, and to seek a place over the heads of the saints instead of at their feet... The people who are looked up to are those who do not take the place, but who are seeking to bear precious fruit for God, and for the blessing of the saints.
Jotham's words were not merely clever. They came true.
Fire came out from Abimelech and devoured the men of Shechem. But when he meant to do the same to the men of Thebez, no fire came out from him. Instead, a piece of a broken millstone came down from a woman of Thebez and dealt him a death-blow. The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing... Jotham's parable not only contained a prophecy but a curse, which was fulfilled.
- Demand. The trees wanted a king so much that three refusals did not stop them. They lowered the standard instead of dropping the desire.
- Refusal. The fruitful trees would not trade real service for an empty place above others.
- Vacancy. The bramble had nothing to give up, and that is precisely why it accepted.
- Debasing. The trees could only crown the thorn-bush by putting themselves under it. Anything lifted up that way ends in ruin, for itself and for all who trust it.
- Fire. What they crowned burned them. Jotham's parable was both prophecy and curse, and God's government carried it out.
And the thorn-bush said to the trees, If in truth ye anoint me king over you, come, put confidence in my shadow; but if not, fire shall come out of the thorn-bush and devour the cedars of Lebanon.
Jotham's parable has worked its way down the ranks of the trees: the olive, the fig and the vine all refuse the crown, and only the thornbush says yes. Its answer is the point of the whole story: an offer of shelter and a threat of fire, from the one plant with no shade to give.
The three trees that turned down the crown each had something to lose. The bramble, or thornbush, had nothing.
The olive had its richness, which honoured both God and man. The fig tree had its sweetness and good fruit. The vine had its wine which cheered God and man. Each had their own place in the scheme of creation and had no wish to be other than they were. The bramble had neither beauty nor usefulness. It was known mainly for its thorns. Those thorns showed the curse resting on the plant world as the fruit of man's sin, according to Genesis 3:18. It was quite willing to accept promotion and lord it over others.
Behind the refusals lies a warning about what the trees were doing in the first place.
Man's heart tends to make another king than God and to put leaders in His place. This destroys the purpose for which God gave the olive, the fig and the vine — His various gifts. But the worthiest are the very ones who will refuse. They will not leave their happy service, their sweetness and their fruit, to go and "wave over" the trees. So kingship comes easily to the thorn-bush. It has nothing to give up, and nothing to give except thorns.
The bramble is a thin, straggling weed. Its shadow is a joke, and so is its threat against the cedars.
There is utter sarcasm in the phrase "the shadow of the bramble". And fire coming out of the thin straggling weed called the bramble, to burn up the mighty cedars of Lebanon — that is irony at its best.
The bramble does not ask for loyalty. It demands submission, and it names the penalty for refusing.
The spirit of rule is the spirit of service. The moment it passes into rule merely, it passes away from service and fruit-bearing. Get away from fruit-bearing and you get emptiness. That is what you have here. The trees elect a bramble bush to rule them. The bramble's answer is very telling: "If I am to be ruler, then you have either got to bow to me, or fire will come out and burn up all the trees, from the cedar of Lebanon in its height down to the smallest of them." It is rule or ruin.
The bramble aims its threat upward, at trees far above it.
This is arrogant dictatorship, but Israel had allowed this very thing in the case of Abimelech. He served only his own pride. The cedars' dignity stood far above the bramble. Yet, contemptible as he was in his pride, he would threaten them with destruction from his own person!
Jotham aimed the parable at Abimelech. Writers aim it closer to home.
What a lesson about what rule is among the people of God! How it searches our hearts... It makes us realise how easy it is to become mere brambles. How easy to seek a place, not at the feet of God's people, but over their heads... Do you want believers to look up to you? Ah, you are a bramble, if you covet that. People look up to those who do not take the place, but who seek to bear precious fruit for God.
The threat was not empty talk. Jotham's words turned out to be a forecast.
In verse 15 we see Jotham as a master of sarcasm and a man of prophetic vision. An element of prophecy appears here. The men of Shechem and others began by putting their trust in the wicked upstart Abimelech. But very soon an evil spirit sprang up between the two parties. It ended in fire from Abimelech consuming the men of Shechem and their tower, and Abimelech himself was destroyed.
That fire had a source behind Abimelech.
But something worse than thorns would come — the fire of God's wrath, which from this side and from that would destroy both king and people.
The parable leaves the trees under a thornbush. Scripture does not leave the world there.
The reign of the thorn-bush has been all that man has yet seen. His choice of rulers will produce nothing else until the Abimelechs have received their judgment. Then the time of revival will come, with the presence of the Risen One. He was once crowned with the thorn, and now with glory forever.
- Fruit refuses. The olive, fig and vine would not leave real usefulness for an empty position above others.
- Thorn accepts. The one with nothing to give up is eager for the crown. Thorns mark the curse, not fitness to rule.
- Shadow threatens. A bramble offers shade it does not have, then demands submission on pain of fire — rule or ruin.
- Fire answers. The words came true. Abimelech and the men of Shechem destroyed each other, and God's wrath is the fire that destroys both king and people.
- Thorns crowned. Every human bramble-reign ends this way, until the One once crowned with thorns reigns in glory.
Now therefore, if ye have dealt truly and sincerely in that ye have made Abimelech king, and if ye have dealt well with Jerubbaal and his house, and if ye have done to him according to the deserving of his hands;
Jotham is Gideon's one surviving son; his brother Abimelech killed the rest. He has just told the men of Shechem a story about trees, and now he puts them to the test: did they act honestly in making Abimelech king?
Jotham does not accuse outright. He puts the matter as an "if," and lets the facts decide.
Jotham then applied this parable in a practical way. Suppose the Shechemites had acted in truth and sincerity in making Abimelech king. Suppose they had truly dealt well with Gideon and his house. Then they would have reason to rejoice in Abimelech. But Jotham reminds them what his father had done. He risked his life fighting for Israel and delivered them from the Midianites.
The answer is not in doubt. What they had done to Gideon's house settles it.
Of course it is plain that this was not truthful dealing, but deeply wicked. So Jotham adds, "if not, let fire come from Abimelech and devour the men of Shechem, and let fire come from the men of Shechem and from Beth Millo and devour Abimelech!" God had put this prophecy into Jotham's mouth. It came true only three years later.
"Jerubbaal" is Gideon's other name. The verse asks whether Shechem dealt well with his house. Their new king had already answered that.
Abimelech soon developed a thirst for blood. He went to his father's house at Ophrah and killed his brothers, the sons of Jerubbaal, seventy men, on one stone. How quickly Israel forgot what they owed to Gideon! But Jotham, the youngest son of Jerubbaal, was left alive, because he had hidden himself. He was able to bear witness. He went and stood on the top of Mount Gerizim — the mount of blessing — and solemnly showed Israel where they stood with the man who had seized the throne.
Jotham's "if" rests on the story he has just told. In it the olive, the fig and the vine all turn down the crown. Why would the best refuse?
Man's heart tends to set up some king other than God and to put leaders in His place. This destroys the use and blessing God gave the olive, the fig and the vine — His various gifts. But the worthiest are the very ones who refuse. They will not leave their happy service, their sweetness and their fruit, to go and "wave over" the trees — to flutter in the wind above them.
The oil and the wine in the story stand for something Israel once had.
Oil answers to the anointing and the power of the Holy Spirit. By it God and men are honoured. The Israel of God can only know this power while kept completely separate from the nations and their principles. New wine is the joy found in shared fellowship between men and God. It is the highest joy anyone could want, and Israel lost it when they took up the spirit and ways of the nations.
The trees turned away from the fruitful trees and took the thorn. It named its price at once.
The moment you get away from fruit bearing, you get emptiness, and that is what you have here. The trees elect a bramble bush to rule them. Its answer is very telling: if I am to be ruler, then you have either got to bow to me, or fire will come out and burn up all the trees, from the tall cedar of Lebanon down to the smallest of them. It is rule or ruin.
Abimelech got the crown he wanted. Shechem got the king they chose.
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable — above all when it is a question of God's things.
If the fruit-bearers will not rule, the question stands: who should?
The lesson of government is the lesson of service, and he rules best who serves best. The real head of the people is the one at their feet serving them. Those who bring them the precious fruits of God's grace — the olive, the fig, the vine — are the ones, and the only ones, whose service rules and leads God's people.
- Fruit refuses. The olive, fig and vine would not give up what honours God and feeds people just to wave above the trees.
- The thorn grasps. Where fruit is refused, emptiness rules. The bramble took the throne and set its terms: "bow or burn" — rule or ruin.
- The question. Jotham's "if" makes Shechem weigh two things: how they treated Gideon's house, and how he risked his life to save them.
- The verdict. It was not honest dealing but deep wickedness. The fire Jotham named fell on both king and city within three years.
- The lesson. Beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God. Those who really lead God's people are the ones at their feet, serving.
-- for my father fought for you, and endangered his life, and delivered you out of the hand of Midian;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
but ye are risen up against my father's house this day, and have slain his sons, seventy men, upon one stone, and have made Abimelech, the son of his handmaid, king over the citizens of Shechem, because he is your brother;
Jotham was the one son of Gideon who escaped the massacre. He stands on Mount Gerizim and puts the men of Shechem on trial. He lists what his father did for them, then what they did to his father's house. This verse is the charge itself: seventy sons killed on one stone, and a ruler chosen for one reason — he was one of their own.
Jotham sets two records side by side — what Gideon did for Shechem, and what Shechem did to his house:
Suppose the Shechemites had acted in truth and sincerity in making Abimelech king. Suppose they had really dealt well with Gideon and his house (v. 16). Then they would have reason to rejoice in Abimelech (v. 19). But in verses 17 and 18 Jotham reminds them that his father had risked his life fighting for Israel, and had delivered them from the Midianites (v. 17). He tells them they had risen against his father's house. They killed 70 of his sons (less one), and made Abimelech king — the son of Gideon's female servant (v. 18).
The man they installed was the opposite of the man they owed:
They are ungrateful to the house of Gideon. War breaks out among them through the leader they set up. Instead of fighting the enemies of God, he only seeks to rule over the people who are now at peace.
Jotham names the new king by his mother. One writer traces the whole disaster back into Gideon's household:
We can hardly pass by the tragic end of Gideon's sons — seventy persons, killed on one stone. It seems strange, when we remember the bright beginning to the story of Gideon. But was there not a cause? Sadly, once again we find there surely was a reason for this tragedy. It was Abimelech, "the son of his female servant" (Judges 9:18), who murdered his seventy brothers. We read in Judges 8:30 that Gideon "had many wives." This in itself was not of God. But it made it even less excusable that he should take his female servant as concubine. It was the gratification of this lust that caused the death of all these sons of Gideon.
Commentators differ on what that phrase signals. Another writer treats Abimelech's mixed birth as the source of his hold on Shechem:
The sources of his power are plainly that he is half Canaanite, half Israelite, son of Gideon on the one side, though son of the female servant on the other. He is, in this respect, another Ishmael.
That is the whole qualification Jotham can find for the new king. Family ties decided it. Writers warn that such ties have a real place, but a limited one:
Nature's ties are very strong. They are perfectly legitimate before God in their proper place. But when they interfere in the things of God, they become a hindrance and a source of trouble and sorrow. Scripture provides many examples of nature's claims opposing God's will. Abraham wanted Ishmael, the son of the slave woman, to live before Him. God refused his request (Genesis 17:18-19).
The seventy deaths bought the throne. Abimelech had to clear away every rival first:
He sets himself to exercise authority over the people of God, and to do that he builds his throne on violence. There must be violence if there is rule of that kind; if there is the rule of man, it must be by violence. Therefore he kills all his brothers, all the many sons of Gideon, with a single exception. Having cut off all rivals, he goes to Shechem, the town of his mother, the town according to nature.
Jotham lists these facts so that the curse he pronounces next will be just. God settled the account in full — and Jerubbaal, in the quote below, is Gideon's other name:
Righteous retribution follows in due course, since God considers it just "to repay with affliction those who afflict you" (2 Thessalonians 1:6). Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham had said... God had decreed his destruction. While Abimelech was fighting against the tower of Thebez, with victory all but sure, a woman threw a piece of millstone down on his head and broke his skull... "Thus God returned the evil of Abimelech, which he committed against his father in killing his seventy brothers. And God also made all the evil of the men of Shechem return on their heads, and upon them came the curse of Jotham the son of Jerubbaal" (Judges 9:56-57).
- Debt. Gideon risked his life to save them. Verse 18 weighs what Shechem did against that unpaid debt.
- Denial. They set up a leader who fought for power over God's people instead of fighting God's enemies.
- Blood. "Because he is your relative" was the only credential. Natural ties are right in their place, but ruinous when they decide the things of God.
- Violence. Rule of that kind has to build its throne on violence: seventy brothers removed, one stone, one survivor.
- Reckoning. God returned Abimelech's evil on his own head, and Shechem's evil on theirs. Jotham's curse landed where he aimed it.
-- if ye then have dealt truly and sincerely with Jerubbaal and with his house this day, rejoice ye in Abimelech, and let him also rejoice in you;
Jotham has just told the men of Shechem a story about trees choosing a king. Now he turns it on them with one condition. If they really dealt well with Gideon's family, let them enjoy their new king. The rest of the chapter shows what that enjoyment cost them.
Verse 19 is a test, not a concession. Jotham allows their claim for a moment. Then he asks whether it fits what they did to Gideon's family. (Older translations read "in truth and sincerity.")
Suppose the Shechemites had acted in truth and sincerity in making Abimelech king. Suppose they had really dealt well with Gideon and his house (v. 16). Then they would have reason to rejoice in Abimelech (v. 19). But in verses 17 and 18 Jotham reminds them what really happened. His father had risked his life fighting for Israel and delivered them from the Midianites (v. 17). Then they turned on his father's house. They killed seventy of his sons, all but one, and made Abimelech king — and Abimelech was the son of Gideon's slave woman (v. 18).
Those facts answer Jotham's own question. The next verse passes sentence.
Clearly their dealing was not truthful. It was grossly wicked. So Jotham adds that if not, fire should come from Abimelech and devour the men of Shechem, and fire from the men of Shechem and from Beth Millo should devour Abimelech (v. 20). God had put this prophecy into Jotham's mouth, and it came true only three years later.
What were they invited to rejoice in? In the parable, their new king offers them his shade.
In verse 15 we see Jotham as a master of sarcasm and a man of prophetic vision. The shadow of a bramble! In the heat of Palestine you could hardly imagine anything less protective. And the bramble invited them to trust in that shade — or else be devoured! The cedars of Lebanon were to fall before the bramble's fire!
The fruitful trees had refused the crown because they had something better to do. That is why the office fell to the one candidate with nothing to lose and nothing to give.
The human heart tends to set up some other king than God. It puts leaders in His place. So it destroys the use and blessing that God gave the olive, the fig, the vine and all His various gifts. But the worthiest are the very ones who refuse. They will not leave their happy service, their sweetness and their fruit just to "wave over" the other trees — to flutter in the wind above them. So kingship comes easily to the thorn-bush. It has to give up nothing, and it has nothing to give but thorns.
The joy Jotham offered both sides turned into ruin for both. Scripture names whose hand was behind it.
It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who paid Abimelech back for his wickedness. It was God who brought all the evil of the men of Shechem down on their own heads. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.
The parable is not only about ancient politics. It also asks who should lead among God's people. Wanting the place is what rules a person out.
What a lesson as to what rule is amongst the people of God! How it searches our hearts as we think of it! It shows us how easy it is to become mere brambles — to seek a place over the heads of God's people instead of at their feet. The one who rules is the one who does as Christ did and serves among them. Do you want God's people to look up to you? Ah, you are a bramble, if you covet that. The people others look up to are those who do not take the place. They are seeking to bear precious fruit for God, and for the blessing of His people.
Shechem's mistake was placing its confidence in a man. The trees Jotham named point elsewhere.
The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail. He is the true Vine, the Olive and the Fig Tree of which Jotham spoke in contrast to the useless bramble. Yes, all His people's need is found in Him.
- Condition — Jotham's "if" is a test the Shechemites cannot pass. Their joy in Abimelech only holds if they really dealt well with Gideon's house.
- Verdict — the murder of Gideon's sons answers the question, so the "if not" of verse 20 takes effect instead.
- Choice — they crowned the one tree with nothing to give up and nothing to give but thorns. They took shelter under a bush that gives no shade.
- Consequence — the joy Jotham offered both sides became fire for both sides. God Himself repaid them.
- Cure — real rule bears fruit and serves; it does not chase a place. Confidence belongs to the Lord, never to a bramble.
but if not, let fire come out from Abimelech, and devour the citizens of Shechem and the house of Millo; and let fire come out from the citizens of Shechem and from the house of Millo, and devour Abimelech.
Jotham has just told the Bible's first parable: trees looking for a king, who settle on a thornbush. Now he turns that story on both Abimelech and the men of Shechem. Everything hangs on the words that open the verse: "but if not."
Jotham does not start with doom. First he allows that the men of Shechem may have acted rightly. Then he tells them they did not.
If this was truthful and sincere dealing, then let them rejoice in Abimelech. And let him rejoice in the people of Shechem (v. 19). Of course it is evident this was not truthful dealing, but grossly wicked. […] This was a prophecy God had put into the mouth of Jotham and it came true only three years later.
The fire in Jotham's curse is the bramble's own weapon, taken straight from the parable. The choice of plant is the whole argument.
The parable concerned four "trees": the olive, fig, vine and the bramble, or thorn-bush. The trees invited each one in turn to be their king. The olive had its fatness whereby both God and man were honoured. The fig tree had its sweetness and good fruit. The vine had its wine which cheered God and man. Each had their own place in the scheme of creation and had no wish to be other than they were. The bramble had neither beauty nor usefulness. It was known mainly for its thorns. Those thorns displayed the curse resting on the plant creation as the fruit of man's sin, according to Genesis 3:18. It was quite willing to accept promotion and lord it over others.
The bramble's answer shows what rule becomes when it stops serving.
The spirit of rule is the spirit of service. The moment it passes into that of rule merely, it passes away from that of service and of fruit bearing. The moment you get away from fruit bearing, you get emptiness, and that is what you have here. The trees elect a bramble bush to rule them. Its answer is very significant. If I am to be ruler, you must either bow to me, or fire will come out and burn up all the trees — from the cedar of Lebanon in its height down to the smallest of them. It is rule or ruin.
Jotham asks for fire in two directions, and the chapter records both. The alliance that began in murder turned on itself.
Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham prophesied. Gaal the son of Ebed won the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He made them curse Abimelech and rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo. At first he appeared to carry all before him. But God had decreed his destruction. While he was fighting against the tower of Thebez, with the final victory all but sure, "a certain woman cast a piece of millstone upon Abimelech's head" and crushed his skull. God is not restricted to means.
The wording of verse 20 is a request. The last verses of the chapter name who granted it — and commentators press the point that this is not an embarrassment to be explained away.
The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. […] God it was who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was who paid back the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous. The modern teaching of these later days has produced a weak, watered-down religion. It flinches at the bare idea of God exercising His holy government in carrying out justice. He goes on carrying it out all the same.
Writers apply the bramble to anyone who wants a position over others instead of fruit for God.
What a lesson this is about rule among the people of God! How it searches our hearts. How it makes us realise how easy it is to become mere brambles, and to seek a place over God's people instead of at their feet. […] Do you want people to look up to you? Ah, you are a bramble, if you covet that. The people who are looked up to are those who do not take the place, but who are seeking to bear precious fruit for God.
The three trees that refused the crown point to someone better.
The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail. He is the true Vine, the Olive and the Fig Tree of which Jotham spoke, in contrast to the useless bramble. Yes, all His people's need is found in Him.
- Condition — "If not" is the hinge. The curse falls only because the dealing was wicked, not truthful.
- Character — The bramble has no fruit, no shade, no use; all it can offer a kingdom is fire.
- Choice — Fruitless authority can only say bow or burn. It is rule or ruin.
- Consequence — Fire ran both ways within three years, just as Jotham said. The partners in murder destroyed each other.
- Court — God's government stood behind the whole collapse and repaid both sides. The answer to the bramble is the Lord Himself, the true Vine, Olive and Fig Tree, who meets every need.
And Jotham ran away, and fled, and went to Beer, and dwelt there, because of Abimelech his brother.
Jotham has just called down his fable of the trees from Mount Gerizim on the men of Shechem below. Now Gideon's last surviving son runs. Two questions follow: was this a failure of nerve, and why does the writer name the small place he ran to?
The order matters. Jotham speaks first, and the words are not his own.
This was a prophecy God had put into the mouth of Jotham and it was fulfilled only three years later. But Jotham then ran away, going to Beer to live at a distance from his cruel brother (v. 21).
Abimelech had killed seventy of his brothers. Jotham is what remains, and his name carries his role.
Jotham ("Jehovah is perfect") bears in his name the character of a true witness.
His escape keeps a witness alive. One man survives a purge meant to leave nobody. The next writer calls Gideon by his other name, Jerubbaal.
Of course, Abimelech's way has to be cleared by wiping out Jerubbaal's true successors. Even so, a remnant escapes into hiding at Beer, the "well" — a good place for God's refugees. That remnant is Jotham, who is still able to make his testimony against the usurper heard.
The name of the town is the point. Jotham does not flee to nowhere. He settles by water while the people of God fight over who will rule.
Now look at the contrast with Jotham. He cannot join in all this conflict and strife, so he flees to Beer and lives there. Beer means "a well," and he lives by the well, while the people of God carry on their ugly quarrel over authority. He drinks from the fountain of the word of God. That is the only place nourishment and refreshment come from.
Ridout does not leave this in ancient history. He reads Jotham's move as the recurring instinct of believers whenever those in power start fighting each other over position.
For example, bishops have fought with bishops, and pope with pope, over whose claim to first place should be allowed. While they did, the saints of God have been glad to withdraw into the quiet of the word of God. There they drink from a stream of life and love infinitely better than all the Abimelechs in the world. Like fruitful branches growing by the well, they have had something even for those in need; the branches hang over the wall.
Another writer ties the name back to a stop on Israel's journey. There God promised water, and the people sang. On that reading, Jotham's refuge is a gathering point, not a hiding hole.
He went to Beer and lived there. That is "the well of which the LORD said to Moses, 'Gather the people together, so that I may give them water,'" the well Israel celebrated in a song (Num. 21:16-18). So it is with the faithful witnesses. The Christian world around them is already ripe for judgment, and they withdraw to Beer, the true gathering point. That is where the fountain of living water is (compare Jer. 2:13). It is the place of songs and praises too.
Commentators differ in emphasis. One reads Beer as only a safe distance from a murderous brother. Others find the meaning in the name itself.
Jotham disappears from the narrative, but his warning does not. Everything he called down came true without him lifting a hand.
Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham had prophesied… But God had decreed his destruction. Abimelech was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and final victory looked all but sure. Then "a certain woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted to particular means… "Thus God returned the evil of Abimelech, which he committed against his father in killing his seventy brothers. And God also made all the evil of the men of Shechem return on their heads, and upon them came the curse of Jotham the son of Jerubbaal" (Judges 9:56-57).
- Speak, then go. Jotham delivers God's message before he runs. The flight follows the testimony; it does not replace it.
- A remnant survives. Seventy brothers die, but the witness whose name means "Jehovah is perfect" lives on, and Beer makes a good place for God's refugees.
- The refuge is a well. He does not retreat into nothing — he drinks at the fountain of the word of God while others fight over who will rule.
- The well gathers. The same name marks the place where God said He would gather the people and give them water, and where Israel sang.
- The word does the work. Jotham never returns, yet fire falls just as he said, and his curse lands on Abimelech and Shechem alike.
And Abimelech ruled over Israel three years.
Gideon refused to be king and said God alone should rule Israel. One chapter later his son holds that place for three years, and those years show what comes of taking what God never gave.
His very name was a claim. One writer traces how deep the ambition ran:
Disobedience produces its fruit, and now you find Abimelech, son of Gideon, rising up to take the place of his father... He rises as king. Someone gave him his name — perhaps his mother, to show his link to the great man of Israel and to cover the shame of his birth. The name shows how the subtle spirit was at work, whether it found expression or not: "My father was king." That is the very thing his father was not. His father refused to be king, and said God alone should be their king. And yet here is the son who declares that his father was king. What is more, he declares in the strongest way that his son also is going to be king.
God raised up judges to lead Israel. Abimelech wanted a higher place than that:
The wretched Abimelech was not a judge. He sought a still higher position: he had himself proclaimed king (v. 6). Among the people he took the title used by those who rule over the nations. By claiming this title openly (v. 2), he acted in the opposite way to a judge whom God had raised up. To seize this place, he used purely human methods.
The text says he ruled over Israel, yet the crowd that crowned him was tiny. One writer measures the gap between the claim and the reality:
Then a small segment of Israel's population, the people of Shechem and of Beth Millo, gathered together and made Abimelech king. There appeared to be no energy on the part of the other tribes to resist this arrogant seizing of authority. It may be that most just ignored him, for nothing is said of his even attempting to attract the other tribes to him. Yet he was considered king over all Israel (v. 22).
The reign was short, and no blessing came with it:
Abimelech's rule lasted only three years. It was truly a matter of man ruling man to his hurt. God could not bless a kingdom set up in such a way. Both Abimelech and the men of Shechem had left Him out of their calculations. Both came to a tragic end. Today men do likewise. They too will find that God will not be mocked.
The three years end when the men of Shechem turn against the king they made — and behind that, God Himself:
After Abimelech had reigned only three years, God stepped in. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended both them and Abimelech to suffer the consequences of working together in wickedness.
Another writer traces each step back to God, and answers whether that is righteous:
It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought back on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask, in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.
The bramble is not only an old story. The desire for a place above others is a live danger:
Let us not be seeking a place. Let us not be like Abimelech, wanting to step into the empty chair of the leader before him, the place his father had refused... wherever people think that certain ones are rulers, and will stay rulers despite anything in themselves or in the saints, be sure it is the bramble — a plant with no fruit for God.
Some writers read Abimelech as a picture of a ruler still to come:
The glory of the LORD and the blessing of His people were not before him; he wanted to exalt himself — he would be king... Now the Lord has declared that "everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted." Abimelech proved that word true, and so will the evil figure he foreshadows in the future.
- Claim — The name means "my father was king," asserting the one thing Gideon had refused.
- Crown — A faction at Shechem made him king; the nation never chose him, yet Scripture counts him as ruling over Israel.
- Contrast — He was no judge raised up by God, but a man taking the title of the surrounding nations by human methods.
- Clock — Three years is the whole of it; a kingdom built by leaving God out cannot be blessed.
- Collapse — God Himself set the king and his makers against each other. The evil of both came back on their own heads.
And God sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the citizens of Shechem; and the citizens of Shechem dealt treacherously with Abimelech,
Abimelech killed his brothers and bought a crown with silver from a pagan temple. Three years later the alliance that held him up cracked. Scripture traces the crack straight back to God. The verse forces two questions: how can God send an evil spirit, and why would He send one here?
Nothing here happened by accident. The break came at a moment God chose, and both sides were targets.
Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and changed how the men of Shechem felt about him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God meant both they and Abimelech to suffer for the wickedness they had shared in (vv. 23-24). They had made Abimelech king, but they felt no loyalty to him, so they were ready to pull him down.
The same wording appears elsewhere in Scripture. Behind it stands a rule about evil itself: it never acts without God's leave, and never past the limit He sets.
Evil as well as good has its commission from God — not its existence, but its liberty to act, and the limits of its action. So we see in Job in early times, and in Ahab's case later; and what a comfort it is to know this. Nothing can escape from the divine government by the fact or admission of its being evil. How should it? Only in this way can we be at peace, assured that no waves can rise higher than the footstool of His throne.
Not every such sending means the same thing. One writer draws a line between a spirit sent as sentence and a trouble sent as training.
But let me add this. A "messenger of Satan" may be sent out from the presence of God against either the flesh or the heart of man. An evil spirit from the Lord came upon Saul, and a lying spirit came upon the prophets of Ahab. 1 Sam. 16; 1 Kings 22. The Lord was beginning solemn acts of judgment. So He sent these messengers of Satan against the hearts of those who were justly under judgment. But other messengers of Satan reach only the body or the circumstances, as in the case of Paul and of Job. And this is only discipline, not judgment.
Bribery formed the bond God broke. Money from an idol's temple paid for the murder of Gideon's family.
Treasure taken from the house of a false god kept this man in power. That silver did the devil's work. Baal's treasure took the place of Jehovah's power. It gave him the means to persecute and cut off the offspring of faith, the family of God (v. 5).
Abimelech kept his throne for a while. Look at what life in Israel became under him, and at the one man who stood apart.
Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Internal quarrels, treacheries, struggles for power — these were the troubles that shook the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred. But Jehovah, in His grace, made a ray of light shine in the middle of the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony... And should there be, as here, only a single witness left for God in this world, may we be that one.
The same hand that let Abimelech loose also cut him down. God used him as an instrument of justice, and no further.
The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had helped in the wicked murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's wrath praise the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his wrath. God brought on him the miserable destruction he fully deserved.
Abimelech traded on his father's name for his own gain. The same principle reaches past ancient Shechem.
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when a man uses anything of the sort for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap: if he sows to the flesh, of the flesh he reaps corruption.
- Cause — an idol's silver bought the alliance, and murder sealed it. God broke what guilt had built.
- Commission — evil does not get its existence from God. Its freedom to act, and the limits of that freedom, come from Him.
- Character — a spirit sent in judgment strikes the heart. Trials that touch only the body are discipline, not judgment.
- Consequence — that spirit brought no peace. It brought treachery and slaughter, with one faithful witness still shining in the dark.
- Close — God used Abimelech's rage as far as justice required, then stopped him. What a man sows, he reaps.
that the violence [done] to the seventy sons of Jerubbaal might come, and their blood be laid upon Abimelech their brother, who slew them, and upon the citizens of Shechem, who had strengthened his hands to slay his brethren.
Here God explains why Abimelech and Shechem turned on each other. The blood of Gideon's seventy sons was coming back on the men who shed it. The verse names two guilty parties, not one — the man who swung the sword and the city that paid for it.
Verse 24 looks back to a massacre paid for out of an idol's treasury. One writer follows the money and shows what it bought:
Money taken from the house of a false god supported this man's influence. The usurper appealed to the pockets of the people, and did not despise the unholy source the money came from. This silver did the devil's work. Baal's treasure took the place of Jehovah's power. It gave the usurper the means to persecute and cut off the descendants of faith, the family of God.
Jerubbaal is Gideon's other name. So the seventy men killed here were Gideon's own sons.
The verse does not let Shechem shelter behind Abimelech. They "strengthened his hands," so the blood is laid on them too. One writer shows how their partnership broke apart:
After Abimelech had reigned only three years, God stepped in. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech… But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but had no sense of loyalty to him, so were willing to remove him.
The falling-out looks like ordinary politics. Scripture says it was God. And what God used to punish Shechem was the very man Shechem had crowned:
The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the justice of divine retribution. But when he tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger. God brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved.
Modern readers flinch at a God who repays blood with blood. The same writer answers the objection head-on:
God it was who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous. The teaching of these later days has produced a weak and soft religion. It winces at the bare idea of God using His holy government to carry out justice. He goes on carrying it out all the same.
Abimelech had every military advantage and still did not escape. Older translations render the second saying below as "He who kills with the sword must be killed with the sword":
Righteous retribution follows in due time. God "considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you," and "if anyone is to be slain with the sword, with the sword must he be slain."… But God had decreed his destruction. Abimelech was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and final victory looked all but certain. Then a woman threw a piece of a millstone on his head and crushed his skull. God is not limited in His means.
What happened at Shechem was not a one-off. One writer states the rule behind it, then marks off what it does not touch:
"Whatever one sows, that will he also reap." This, however, is not grace but government. Still it is true of a saint as well as of a sinner… I shall never reap the reward of my sins in eternal blessedness, for it is infinite grace. But in the way of righteous government I shall reap the reward of my wrongdoing down here.
- Blood — this verse settles a debt. Seventy of Gideon's sons were murdered, and God had not forgotten them.
- Hands — Shechem never held the knife. But they strengthened the hands that did, and the verse charges them with the same murder.
- Partners — both were guilty, so God turned them against each other. Each became His tool of judgment on the other.
- Limits — God used Abimelech's rage only as far as justice required. Then a woman's millstone stopped him. God is not short of means.
- Harvest — what Shechem sowed, Shechem reaped, and the rule still holds. This is God's government here and now. It is not His grace, which settles sin for eternity.
And the citizens of Shechem set liers in wait for him on the tops of the mountains, and they robbed all that came along that way by them. And it was told Abimelech.
The men of Shechem crowned Abimelech king. Three years later they set ambushes for him in the hills, and the travellers on that road paid for it. Why did the partnership break so fast, and who was behind the break?
The men who crowned Abimelech felt no duty to keep him.
Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but felt no loyalty to him, so were willing to remove him. They put men in ambush against Abimelech, robbing all the people who passed that way. But Abimelech was told about this and of course avoided the danger to himself.
Behind the quarrel between Abimelech and Shechem, one writer sees God's hand.
It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought all their evil back on the heads of the men of Shechem. And we may ask, in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous. Modernist teaching in recent times has produced a weak and soft religiosity. It flinches at the very idea of God exercising His holy government in executing justice. He goes on executing it all the same; and before long we may see further striking displays of it.
Jotham was the one son of Gideon who escaped the killing of his brothers. Three years before this ambush, he stood on the mountain and put Shechem to a test.
If this was truthful and sincere dealing, then let them rejoice in Abimelech and let him rejoice in the people of Shechem. Of course it is clear this was not truthful dealing, but grossly wicked. So Jotham adds, "But if not, let fire come out from Abimelech and devour the leaders of Shechem and Beth-millo; and let fire come out from the leaders of Shechem and from Beth-millo and devour Abimelech." God had put this prophecy into Jotham's mouth, and it came true only three years later. But Jotham then ran away, going to Beer to live at a distance from his cruel brother.
Where did this kingdom come from? One writer traces it back to its foundation.
He sets himself to exercise authority over the people of God, and to do so he builds his throne on violence. There must be violence if there is rule of that kind; if there is the rule of man, it must be by violence. So he kills all his brothers, all the many sons of Gideon, with a single exception. Having cut off all rivals this way, he goes to Shechem, his mother's town, the town according to nature.
Highway robbery, plotting, and betrayal are not isolated crimes here. They are the atmosphere of a nation that has driven out its one faithful voice.
Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. There were internal quarrels, treacheries, and struggles for supremacy. Harvests ended in drunken celebration, and drunkenness vented itself in curses. Then came the ambition of Gaal, the schemes of Ebed, the cunning of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. Such were the troubling elements that disturbed the camp of Israel when the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred. But the Lord, in His grace, caused a ray of light to shine in the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony. We may say this again with confidence as we pass through difficult times.
- Collusion. Shechem and Abimelech built their partnership on the murder of Gideon's sons. God made both partners pay for it.
- Collapse. Three years was all the loyalty lasted — men who crown a king by bribe will ambush him by night.
- Cause. The verse reads like politics. Scripture names the mover: God sent the evil spirit between them.
- Casualties. Abimelech was warned, so the ambush missed him. The travellers on that road paid instead.
- Comfort. Even in a scene of treachery and slaughter, God did not leave Himself without a witness. Jotham's word came true.
And Gaal the son of Ebed came with his brethren, and went over to Shechem; and the citizens of Shechem put confidence in him.
Three years into Abimelech's reign, the city that crowned him wants someone new. A stranger named Gaal arrives and wins its trust at once — and the chapter shows what becomes of people who keep trusting the nearest strong man.
Gaal reads the mood of a discontented city and moves in. What follows is a feast in the temple of the local idol.
Another man, Gaal, the son of Ebed, was ready to take advantage of the situation. He came to Shechem and won over the confidence of the Shechemites. He was a similar character to Abimelech, aspiring to have all authority in his hands. To celebrate the promotion of Gaal, the people gathered grapes from their vineyards and pressed out the juice. They went into the house of their idol, eating and drinking and cursing Abimelech. Such is the folly of men of the world.
Gaal's opening was no accident. Something had moved Shechem to turn on the king it made.
Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended both them and Abimelech to suffer the consequences of their shared wickedness.
Is that just? One writer puts the question plainly:
God it was, who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was, who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.
Shechem had trusted one man and been burned. Now they trust another. Earlier in the chapter Jotham had called their king a bramble, a thorn bush.
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. That is especially true when it is a question of God's things.
The pattern did not end at Shechem:
Men must have a leader. How ready they are to follow any upstart who can promise enough good times to come! And how constantly disappointed and deceived they are by those they follow. That must be the experience of all through life. It lasts until they find and follow the true Leader, the One whom God has appointed to be the Shepherd and Leader of men.
Jotham had warned of fire between the city and its king. Gaal is the match.
Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham prophesied. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He led them to curse Abimelech and to rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo, and at first he seemed to be winning everything.
The two names in this verse carry meaning. One writer reads them as part of the message, and applies the story to later church history.
Take Abimelech as a short picture of the rise and downfall of the power of Rome in Christendom. Then we may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude" — which is indeed the translation of his name. That loathing drives the nations to throw off their allegiance to the man they first lifted into power.
Another writer records how the revolt of Gaal ended:
He is overcome. Abimelech and his officer Zebul are victorious.
Disgust with a tyrant is not the same as deliverance from him.
Set the whole cast side by side and see what Israel's camp had become.
Internal quarrels, betrayals, struggles for supremacy. Grape harvests that end in drunken hilarity, and drunkenness spilling over into curses. The ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the unsettling elements that troubled the camp of Israel, once the testimony of God had left it.
- Confidence given. Shechem's leaders trust a newcomer who saw an opening. It is the same misplaced confidence that made Abimelech king.
- Confidence engineered. God moved Shechem to turn, so that both partners in wickedness would suffer for it.
- Confidence celebrated. They marked Gaal's rise with a harvest feast in an idol's house and curses on the king they once cheered.
- Confidence betrayed. Gaal's rebellion collapsed; loathing your tyrant is not the same as escaping him.
- Confidence that holds. Trusting in man is trusting a bramble. The Leader God appointed, the Shepherd of men, never disappoints those who follow Him.
And they went out into the fields, and gathered their vineyards, and trode [the grapes], and made rejoicings, and went into the house of their god, and ate and drank, and cursed Abimelech.
Abimelech had bought his crown with silver from an idol's temple, then killed his brothers to keep it. Verse 27 is the first spark: the men who crowned him hold a harvest feast in that idol's temple, and end it by cursing him.
The verse says they went into "the house of their god." Commentators name that god. The name itself shows how far Israel had joined itself to its neighbours.
Israel had once again lapsed into idolatry, and taken Baal-berith to be their god. The words mean "lord of the covenant." That may simply mean "covenant-lord," and it may mean more. The worship of Baal was at least a sign of covenant with the Canaanites, whose god he was. The history here gives clear proof of alliance with the pagan nations. Baal-worship and mixing with the Canaanites are found at their worst in the story of crime and bloodshed that follows here.
A grape harvest once carried a meaning in Israel. Jotham's parable, earlier in this chapter, says what it was.
The vine said: "Should I leave my wine, which cheers God and man, and go to be promoted over the trees?" New wine is the joy found in the shared communion of men with God. Israel lost that joy — the highest joy anyone could desire — when they adopted the spirit and ways of the nations.
This was not innocent high spirits. One writer lists the feast among the signs of a camp that God's testimony had left. He follows the line from the wine straight to the curses.
Abimelech was successful. The evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Internal quarrels, betrayals, struggles for supremacy; grape harvests that produced drunken hilarity; drunkenness finding its outlet in curses. Then the ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. Such were the disturbing elements which troubled the camp of Israel, once the testimony of God had left it.
The party even had an occasion behind it.
To celebrate the promotion of Gaal, the people gathered grapes from their vineyards, pressed out the juice and went into the house of their idol, eating and drinking and cursing Abimelech. Such is the folly of men of the world.
The cursing at this feast fits a choice the nation had already made.
Long before, Moses had decreed that six tribes should stand on Mount Ebal to curse, and six on Mount Gerizim to bless. Joshua remembered this when the people entered Canaan. But since then Israel had morally chosen Ebal, the place of cursing. Jotham chose Gerizim, the place of blessing, and he stood there alone.
Shechem had cheered for Abimelech. Now Shechem curses him. Commentators see God's hand behind the change, and guilt on both sides.
After Abimelech had reigned only three years, God intervened by moving the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer for joining together in wickedness.
The curses at the feast grew into open rebellion. The rebellion grew into a fire that burned both ways.
Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham prophesied. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous men of Shechem. He led them to curse Abimelech and to rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king in turn, to devour them and the house of Millo.
The warning outlives Shechem. Men lifted up a man, and reaped betrayal and fire.
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. That is true above all when it is a question of God's things.
- Idol — The feast fills the temple of Baal-berith, "lord of the covenant." Worship of that god was itself proof that Israel had allied with the Canaanites.
- Wine — Wine in this chapter stands for joy shared between God and man. Israel lost that joy when it took up the spirit and ways of the nations around it.
- Curse — Drunken cheer turns into cursing, and the mouths that crowned Abimelech now curse him. Israel had morally chosen Ebal, the mountain of cursing, while Jotham stood alone on Gerizim, the mountain of blessing.
- Fire — God moved Shechem against Abimelech, so that both partners in the crime would bear the cost. The curse at the feast grows into the fire Jotham foretold, and it consumes each side in turn.
- Warning — The chapter is the bitter harvest of one man's pride and a city's folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God.
And Gaal the son of Ebed said, Who is Abimelech, and who is Shechem, that we should serve him? is he not the son of Jerubbaal? and Zebul his overseer? Serve the men of Hamor the father of Shechem! and why should *we* serve him?
The city that lifted Abimelech into power has turned against him. At a harvest feast a man named Gaal says out loud what the men of Shechem already feel. His question challenges Abimelech's right to rule. It also offers himself in Abimelech's place.
Gaal speaks as though the city is already his. One writer sets his boast beside what he said next:
Gaal could then be very bold in asking, "Who is Abimelech, and who are we of Shechem, that we should serve him?" (v. 28). This is only a case of one broken piece of pottery quarrelling with another. The proud words fall from his lips: "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech" (v. 29). Then he sent a message for Abimelech to build up his army and come out to battle.
Gaal does not simply attack Abimelech. He points Shechem back to an older name — Hamor, the city's prince in Jacob's day:
Prince of the Hivites and father of Shechem. Jacob bought a piece of ground from his family, and Joseph was buried in it. Genesis 33:19; Joshua 24:32; Judges 9:28. He is called Emmor in Acts 7:16. Simeon and Levi killed him with the sword, along with Shechem and all the males of the city, to avenge their sister Dinah.
So the appeal reaches back past Israel, to a family line that fell to the sword long before.
The names in this scene carry their own commentary. One writer reads them as a picture of what happens when people tire of the ruler they themselves raised up:
We may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude." That is in fact the translation of his name. It stirs the nations to throw off their allegiance to the very man they first lifted into power. No wonder the descendants of the "wild ass" (Hamor) rebel against so harsh a yoke as the one they had put their own necks into! But escaping from it is another matter. It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez.
Gaal's boast did not go unanswered. Zebul, the officer he had just named, threw the words back at him:
Zebul was ready to distract him, and told him he was only seeing the shadows of the mountains as if they were men. But Gaal kept watching, and insisted there were two companies of people coming from different directions (v. 37). Then Zebul taunted Gaal with the reminder of his own words, "Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised (v. 28). Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal had to gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself; he could do nothing else.
Gaal's ambition is one item on a longer list. One writer sets them side by side to show what the scene had become:
Abimelech was successful. The evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Once the testimony of God had left the camp of Israel, unsettling elements troubled it. There were internal quarrels, betrayals, and struggles for supremacy. Grape harvests produced drunken merriment, and drunkenness vented itself in curses. There was the ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, and the violence of Abimelech.
The same writer then turns to the one witness left:
He does not leave Himself without testimony. We can say this again with confidence as we pass through difficult times. And if there is, as here, only a single witness left for God in this world, may we be that one — that despised Jotham, the last of all, but standing firm for God.
Shechem trusted one man, and it went wrong. Now Gaal asked the city to trust him instead. One writer draws the lesson of Abimelech's pride and Shechem's folly:
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable, Judges 9 — and especially when it is a question of God's things.
- Trust misplaced. Shechem trusted Abimelech. When that soured, it moved its trust to Gaal — one broken piece of pottery quarrelling with another.
- Trust in names. Gaal's argument rests on ancestry. He calls the city back to Hamor, whose house fell to the sword long before.
- Trust bred of loathing. His name means loathing bred by servitude. People throw off the ruler they raised up. Throwing him off is easier than escaping him.
- Trust that traps. Zebul repeated Gaal's boast back to him. Gaal had committed himself, and now he had no choice but to fight.
- Trust that holds. In a camp of ambition, craft and violence, God kept one witness standing. The chapter's warning holds: do not trust in man, above all in the things of God.
Oh! would that this people were under my hand! then would I remove Abimelech. And he said to Abimelech, Increase thine army, and come out.
Shechem's people crowned Abimelech king, and now they have turned against him. At a harvest feast Gaal offers himself as the man who could remove him, raising the question: what is a leader worth when people, not God, put him there?
Gaal is no better than the man he wants to replace. He wins the city with the same appetite for power, in a setting of feasting and cursing.
Another man, Gaal, the son of Ebed, was ready to take advantage of the situation, and coming to Shechem, won over the confidence of the Shechemites. He was a similar character to Abimelech, aspiring to have all authority in his hands. To celebrate the promotion of Gaal, the people gathered grapes from their vineyards and pressed out the juice. They went into the house of their idol, eating and drinking and cursing Abimelech. Such is the folly of men of the world.
The wish for the people to be under his hand is a claim to command. But set beside the man he challenges, it is a quarrel between equals, and neither is worth anything.
Gaal could then be very bold in asking, "Who is Abimelech, and who are we of Shechem, that we should serve him?" (v. 28). This is only a case of one broken piece of pottery fighting with another, and the proud words fall from his lips: "Would that this people were under my hand! Then I would remove Abimelech" (v. 29). Then he issued a message for Abimelech to increase his army and come out to battle.
His name carries the mood he is trading on. It also carries the trap: shaking off a yoke is easier to shout about than to do.
We may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred by "servitude." That is in fact what his name means. It is what stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the man they themselves first lifted into power. No wonder the descendants of Hamor — whose name means "wild ass" — rebel against so harsh a yoke, when they put their own necks into it. But escaping it is another matter.
Gaal thinks he is seizing an opening. God made that opening, and God made it to catch both sides.
Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the results of joining together in wickedness.
Gaal gets his answer sooner than he expects. The man standing beside him at the gate throws his own words back at him.
Then Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words: "Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.
The crowd that cheered him does not stand with him either.
The men of Shechem receive a rival to Abimelech. They receive him in a half-hearted way, and then thrust him out to meet Abimelech, who puts him to flight.
Gaal's ambition is one thread in a tangle. Each figure in the chapter adds a different vice. Together they show what remains when God's testimony leaves.
Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. There were quarrels within, betrayals and struggles for the top place. There were grape harvests that ended in drunken laughter, and drunkenness that poured itself out in curses. There was the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel, once the testimony of God had left it.
Jotham had already named the alternative to brambles fighting brambles.
The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail. He is the true Vine, the Olive and the Fig Tree of which Jotham spoke in contrast to the useless bramble. Yes, all His people's need is found in Him.
- Same hand. Gaal wants the people "under my hand" — the very craving that produced Abimelech. Swapping one grasping ruler for another changes nothing.
- Same clay. The contest is one broken pot fighting another. The proud words come from a man who is himself only a broken piece.
- Same yoke. His name means loathing bred of servitude. People rebel against a yoke they put their own necks into, and find escaping it is another matter.
- Same reckoning. God moved Shechem against Abimelech so both partners in the wickedness would reap it. Gaal's rebellion is the tool, not the escape.
- Another hand. Brambles burn each other; the Vine, Olive and Fig Tree bear fruit. The Lord alone is our sufficiency, and He meets every need of His people.
And Zebul the ruler of the city heard the words of Gaal the son of Ebed, and his anger was kindled;
Judges 9 tells how Shechem made Abimelech king and then turned against him. This verse catches the moment his deputy in the city hears that a rival is speaking against him. The anger that flares here sets a battle in motion. But the deeper question is who directs these quarrels, and why.
Zebul's anger answers something said. A newcomer named Gaal had won the city's confidence, and his talk grew bold.
Gaal then could be very bold in questioning, "Who is Abimelech and who is Shechem, that we should serve him?" (v. 28). This is only a case of one piece of broken pottery from the earth fighting with another, and the proud words fall from his lips: "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech" (v. 29). Then he issued a message for Abimelech to increase his army and come out to battle.
The names in this story carry meaning too. One writer links Gaal's name to the feeling that breeds revolt:
Take Abimelech as a short picture of the rise and ruin of Rome's power in Christendom. Then perhaps we may see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred by "servitude" — which is in fact what his name means. That loathing stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the very man they first lifted into power.
Zebul's title names a job, not an honour. He held the city for someone else:
Governor of Shechem for Abimelech while the latter was absent. Judges 9:28-41.
So an attack on Abimelech's right to rule was an attack on the post Zebul held.
Zebul did not confront Gaal. He had kept quiet while the city's mood turned, and he used that quiet to act.
However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathize with Gaal, though he had evidently kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech to warn him of what Gaal was doing (vv. 30-31). He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack the city in the morning (vv. 32-33).
Zebul is not a hero of the story. Set beside the others in the chapter, his part has its own flavour — and the whole cast together shows what Israel had become.
Quarrels at home, betrayals, struggles for the top place, grape harvests that ended in drunken merrymaking, drunkenness that poured itself out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech — these were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred. But Jehovah, in His grace, caused a ray of light to shine in the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony.
The quarrel between Shechem and its king did not begin with Gaal or Zebul. Earlier in the chapter the cause is named, and one writer refuses to soften it:
It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who paid back the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.
The same rule reaches far beyond Abimelech:
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when anyone uses such a thing for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.
- Sown — Abimelech seized power for self and not for God. Every later scene in the chapter is the harvest of that sowing.
- Loathing — Gaal's boast is the resentment of people who lifted a man into power and then could not bear the yoke they chose.
- Office — Zebul governed Shechem for the absent king. His anger is the anger of a man whose own place depends on Abimelech's.
- Craft — He answers with craft, not courage. He keeps quiet and sends a secret message that puts an army outside the walls by night.
- Reaped — Behind the ambition, the craft and the violence stands God. His righteous hand repays both the king and the city, and still leaves one witness for Himself in the dark.
and he sent messengers to Abimelech craftily, saying, Behold, Gaal the son of Ebed and his brethren are come to Shechem, and behold, they shut up the city against thee;
Shechem made Abimelech king, and three years later the same city turned against him. The warning came from Zebul, Abimelech's own governor inside the walls.
The trouble did not begin with Gaal. One commentator traces the revolt to God's own hand, and to guilt on both sides:
Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in and moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proved too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of joining together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, yet felt no loyalty to him, so they were willing to remove him.
Zebul never sided with Gaal, but he said nothing out loud. He acted in secret instead, and sent Abimelech more than a warning:
However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathize with Gaal, though he had clearly kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech to warn him of what Gaal was doing. He also advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack in the morning. Abimelech acted on this advice, having all his army ready for a surprise attack on Gaal and his men.
Older translations call the message "craftily" sent, and say Gaal's men were shutting the city up against Abimelech rather than stirring it up. The next morning showed how crafty Zebul was. He stood beside Gaal and lied to his face. Gaal saw men coming down from the hills, and Zebul told him he was only seeing shadows. Then he threw Gaal's own boast back at him:
Zebul was ready to distract him, and told him he was only seeing the shadows of the mountain as if they were men. But Gaal was now watching closely. He insisted that two companies of people were coming from different directions. Then Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words: "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" These, he said, were the very people Gaal had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was.
One writer finds the character of both men in their names. Gaal's name means loathing bred of servitude. Zebul's part is craft, not loyalty:
In Gaal, the son of Ebed, we may perhaps see the "loathing" bred of "servitude" — that is exactly what his name means. It is a loathing that stirs the nations to throw off their allegiance to the very man they first lifted into power... And Zebul, whose character all through is craft, is Abimelech's officer to keep the city obedient. He may easily stand for the appearance of holiness that a power like Rome knows so well how to use when it enforces its claims.
Commentators differ over the larger picture. One reads Abimelech's rise and fall as the course of Rome's power. Another sees him as a foreshadowing of the man of sin, an evil ruler still to come:
In the Old Testament Scriptures the Spirit of God has drawn our attention to several men who clearly foreshadow the coming man of sin. Among them Abimelech the son of Gideon holds a solemn place.
The secret message is one strand in a chapter of double-dealing. One writer lists the whole scene, naming each man by the vice he brought:
Quarrels at home, betrayals, fights for the top place, grape harvests that ended in drunken laughter, drunkenness that poured itself out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it.
Secret messengers and betrayals look like human scheming and nothing more. One writer names the older crime underneath them, and God as the one repaying it:
The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who paid Abimelech back for his own wickedness. It was God who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.
- Collusion. Shechem backed the murder of Gideon's sons and made Abimelech king. God intended both sides to reap what that shared wickedness earned.
- Rebellion. Gaal's name means loathing bred of servitude. It is the resentment that turns on the very man it once lifted into power.
- Craft. Zebul keeps quiet, sends word in secret, then tells Gaal he is seeing shadows. His weapon is deceit, not courage.
- Collapse. Once God's testimony left the camp of Israel, ambition, advice, craft and violence were all it had.
- Government. This is not just politics. God sent the evil spirit between them and returned their evil on their own heads, and He was right to do it.
and now, rise up by night, thou and the people that are with thee, and lie in ambush in the fields.
Abimelech's own kingmakers have turned against him, and a newcomer named Gaal now holds the city's confidence. Zebul, Abimelech's officer inside Shechem, secretly tells him to march at night and lie in wait in open country — but who is really directing that march?
The verse is one line inside a secret message. One writer sets out the whole exchange:
However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathise with Gaal, though he had evidently kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech, warning him of what Gaal was doing (vv. 30-31). He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack in the morning (vv. 32-33). Abimelech acted on this advice, having all his army ready for a surprise attack on Gaal and his men.
The rebellion did not begin with Gaal. Three years earlier, something turned Shechem against the king they had crowned:
Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God intervened. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of working together in wickedness (vv. 23-24).
Another writer says plainly who was behind it:
It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who paid back the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.
One writer traces what each man brings to the quarrel:
We may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude" — which is exactly what his name means. That loathing stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the man they themselves first lifted into power… Zebul shows craft all the way through. He is Abimelech's officer, there to keep the city obedient.
Another writer lists what filled the camp once God's testimony was gone:
Internal quarrels, treacheries, struggles for supremacy. Grape harvests that ended in drunken partying, and drunkenness that spilled over into cursing. The ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the disturbing elements that troubled the camp of Israel, once God's testimony had left it.
Zebul's plan worked. Abimelech took the field, beat Gaal, and went on to level the city — and the victory was itself the judgment Jotham had foretold:
Just as Jotham prophesied, fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He made them curse Abimelech and rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo. At first he seemed to carry all before him. But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and the final victory looked all but sure, when a woman threw a piece of millstone down on his head and crushed his skull.
A chapter of ambushes and betrayals leaves one practical warning:
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly, and teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable, Judges 9 — and especially so when it is a question of God's things.
The same writer points to where trust does belong:
The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail.
- Trust — Shechem lifted a bramble into power. This verse is part of the bitter harvest. Beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God.
- Treachery — Zebul keeps quiet, then sends word in secret. But the rebellion he reports was God's own doing. Both sides would suffer for the wickedness they shared.
- Craft — Gaal is the loathing bred by servitude. Zebul is the crafty officer who keeps the city obedient.
- Retribution — the ambush worked and Shechem fell. Then a woman's millstone ended Abimelech. God is not unrighteous when He takes vengeance.
- Refuge — a camp without God's testimony bred only quarrels and craft. The Lord alone is our sufficiency, and His love and power never fail.
And it shall be in the morning when the sun is up, thou shalt rise early, and fall upon the city; and behold, he and the people that is with him shall come out against thee, and thou shalt do with him as thou shalt find occasion.
Shechem made Abimelech king, and now the city has turned on him and is backing a rival named Gaal. Verse 33 is the second half of a secret message from Zebul, the city's own governor. He plans a night march and a dawn raid — but who is really directing all this scheming?
Zebul was Abimelech's officer in a city that had turned against Abimelech. Verse 33 sets the timing of the attack, and one writer lays out the whole plan:
However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathise with Gaal, though he had evidently kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech to warn him of what Gaal was doing (vv. 30-31). He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack the city in the morning (vv. 32-33). Abimelech acted on this advice, having all his army ready for a surprise attack on Gaal and his men.
The plan depended on Gaal seeing nothing until it was too late. At dawn the man who had sent the letter stood beside Gaal, talking him out of what his own eyes were telling him:
Early in the morning Gaal went out and stood at the entrance to the city gate. He said to Zebul, who was with him, "Look, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains!" Zebul was ready to put him off. He told him he saw only the shadows of the mountain, as if they were men. But Gaal was watching closely now. He insisted that two companies of people were coming from different directions. Then Zebul taunted Gaal with the reminder of his words, "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" ... Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.
Zebul could only write that letter because Shechem and its king had already fallen out. The split had a deeper cause than politics:
Abimelech had reigned only three years when God stepped in. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of joining together in wickedness (vv. 23-24). They had made Abimelech king, but they felt no loyalty to him, so they were willing to remove him from power.
Shechem and Abimelech each fought for their own ends. The end of the chapter says another hand was at work, and it shows how far God let Abimelech's success run:
The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to chastise them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's wrath praise the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his wrath. He brought on him the miserable destruction which he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse — and that curse came true.
These plots and quarrels show what Israel had become. The same passage shows where to stand when things go that way:
Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Once the testimony of God had left the camp of Israel, unsettling things troubled it. There were internal quarrels, treacheries and struggles for supremacy. There were grape harvests that ended in drunken laughter, and drunkenness venting itself in curses. There was the ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul and the violence of Abimelech... And if only a single witness is left for God in this world, as here, may we be that one. May we be like that despised Jotham — the last of all, but standing firm for God.
- Collusion. Shechem and Abimelech shared one crime, and God meant both of them to suffer for it.
- Division. God moved the men of Shechem to turn against the king they had crowned. Their falling out was the start of the reckoning.
- Craft. Abimelech's own officer in the city kept quiet, sent word in secret, then stood at the gate calling an advancing army "shadows." Gaal had committed himself and could do nothing else.
- Restraint. God used Abimelech's violence to punish Shechem as it deserved. When Abimelech tried to push further, God cut his wrath short and destroyed him.
- Testimony. Israel's camp was full of ambition, treachery and violence. One despised witness still stood for God. In such times, that is the place to want.
And Abimelech rose up, and all the people that were with him, by night, and they lay in ambush against Shechem in four companies.
By night Abimelech splits his force into four companies against Shechem — the city that crowned him three years before. The move looks like good soldiering. But why is a king ambushing the city that made him, and who started the quarrel?
The plan was not Abimelech's. The city's own governor sent it to him, after staying silent while Gaal stirred Shechem up against the king.
Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathise with Gaal, though he had clearly kept quiet. He sent messengers secretly to Abimelech, warning him of what Gaal was doing (vv. 30-31). He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack in the morning (vv. 32-33). Abimelech acted on this advice, having all his army ready for a surprise attack on Gaal and his men.
The split between the king and the city did not begin with Gaal. One writer traces it back to God, and to a reckoning aimed at both sides.
Abimelech had reigned only three years when God intervened. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the consequences of collusion in wickedness (vv. 23-24). They had made Abimelech king, but had no sense of loyalty to him, so were willing to depose him.
One writer names God as the actor at every stage, and answers the charge that this makes Him unjust.
The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. God it was who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.
Jotham had prophesied that fire would break out between Shechem and its king. The night attack is that fire starting to burn.
Fire came out from the men of Shechem as Jotham prophesied, to devour Abimelech. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He made them curse Abimelech and rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo, and at first he appeared to carry everything before him. But God had decided on his destruction.
The night attack is one move in a longer breakdown. One writer lists the forces pulling Israel apart at this point.
Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Internal quarrels, betrayals, struggles for supremacy. Grape harvests that ended in drunken excitement, and drunkenness venting itself in curses. The ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the disturbing forces that troubled the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it.
Abimelech's career ran on his father's name. One writer draws a rule out of it that reaches far beyond Abimelech.
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anything of that sort is used for self and not for God, bitter disappointment must follow. If there is anything in his history more striking than the rest, it is how solemnly God repaid him. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.
Another writer turns the warning on us.
Let us not be seeking a position. Let us not be like Abimelech, wanting to step into the empty chair of some predecessor — a chair his father had actually refused.
- Sown — Abimelech took the throne through the murder of Gideon's sons, and Shechem shared the guilt. "What a man sows he must reap" governs the rest of the chapter.
- Sent — God moved the city against its king. He meant both sides to answer for their shared wickedness.
- Secret — betrayal sets the ambush up. Abimelech's own governor in Shechem kept quiet, then warned him.
- Success — the surprise attack works. Early victory proves nothing, because God had already decided on his destruction.
- Settled — Jotham's prophecy came true to the letter. The God who repaid Abimelech was righteous in doing it.
And Gaal the son of Ebed went out, and stood in the entrance of the gate of the city. Then Abimelech rose up, and the people that were with him, out of the ambush.
This verse is the hinge of a trap: Gaal steps out at daybreak to take the city gate as Shechem's new strongman. He does not know that Abimelech's men have been hiding in the fields all night, and that they rise the moment he appears.
The verse catches two movements at once: Gaal taking his stand, and the hidden force rising. One commentator sets the scene and follows it through the exchange that comes next, when Gaal squints at the hillsides and is told he is only seeing shadows:
Early in the morning Gaal went out and stood at the entrance to the city gate, and he said to Zebul who was with him, "Look, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains!" Zebul was ready to divert him, and told him he saw only the shadows of the mountain as if they were men. But Gaal was now intent on watching, and insisted that there were two companies of people coming from different directions.
Gaal stands in the gate because his own mouth has already put him there. He had boasted in public. Zebul, the man at his side, throws that boast back at him when the troops appear:
Zebul taunted Gaal with his own words: "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.
Standing "in the entrance of the gate" is not a detail about geography. In Israel, the gate was where the city settled its business. To sit there was to hold rank:
Gates protected a city, but "in the gate" was also the place where people settled many important matters. When Boaz wanted the question of Ruth and the inheritance settled, he went up to the gate. There he debated the matter with a nearer relative, then closed it, with the elders as witnesses. To "sit in the gate" was a place of honour... It should have been the place of true judgement and justice, but was not always so.
Behind both men stands God Himself. He stirred up the quarrel between Abimelech and Shechem, and He meant both sides to pay for the wickedness they had shared in:
Abimelech had reigned only three years when God stepped in. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should pay for working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but felt no loyalty to him, so they were willing to remove him. They set men in ambush against Abimelech and robbed everyone who passed that way.
Shechem set the first ambush. In this verse Abimelech rises out of one against them. Another writer follows the same thread of retribution, back to the warning Jotham had spoken over the city:
Righteous retribution follows in due course, for "God considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you." Fire came out from the men of Shechem as Jotham prophesied, to devour Abimelech; Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites and caused them to curse Abimelech and to rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them, and at first he appeared to be winning everything. But God had decreed his destruction.
The names in this verse carry their own message. One writer weighs what Gaal's name means for a people living under a ruler of their own making:
In Gaal, the son of Ebed, we may perhaps see the "loathing" bred of "servitude." That is indeed the translation of his name. It is what drives the nations to throw off their allegiance to the man they first lifted into power. The descendants of Hamor — whose name means "wild ass" — may well rebel against so harsh a yoke, when they put their own necks into it! But escaping it is another matter.
Whatever the names hint at, the chapter leaves one plain lesson:
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. That is true above all when God's things are at stake.
- Yoke. Shechem chose Abimelech; Gaal's name means the loathing bred by servitude. The yoke they resent is one they fastened on themselves.
- Gate. The gate should be the place of true judgement. Gaal takes that seat of honour wanting only power.
- Boast. His earlier words have fixed him in place. When the troops appear, Zebul quotes them back, and Gaal must fight on short notice.
- Ambush. Shechem set ambushes against Abimelech first; now he rises from one against them. God had stirred the quarrel so both partners in the same wickedness would pay.
- Lesson. Beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God.
And Gaal saw the people, and said to Zebul, Behold, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains. And Zebul said to him, Thou seest the shadow of the mountains as men.
Shechem crowned Abimelech king, then turned against him and backed a newcomer named Gaal — the ruin Jotham had warned would fall on both. In verse 36 Gaal's eyes tell him the truth, and Zebul's words talk him out of it.
Zebul was Abimelech's officer inside the city. So when Gaal spots movement on the high ground, Zebul answers in a way that keeps him standing there a little longer.
Early in the morning Gaal went out and stood at the entrance to the city gate. He told Zebul that people were coming down from the tops of the mountains. Zebul was ready to divert him, and told him he saw only the shadows of the mountain as if they were men. But Gaal was now intent on watching, and insisted that there were two companies of people coming from different directions.
Gaal had come to Shechem talking big. The words Zebul throws back at him at the gate are his own.
Gaal then could be very bold in questioning, "Who is Abimelech and who is Shechem, that we should serve him?" This is only one piece of broken pottery fighting with another. The proud words fall from his lips, "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech." Then he issued a message for Abimelech to increase his army and come out to battle.
When the taunt lands, Gaal has no way back out of it.
Then Zebul taunted Gaal with the reminder of his words, "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.
One writer finds the motive of the whole revolt in the meaning of Gaal's name.
We may perhaps see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude." That is indeed the translation of his name. Such loathing drives people to throw off their loyalty to the very man they first lifted into power. But breaking free is another matter. Zebul, whose character throughout is that of craft, is Abimelech's officer to keep the city in obedience.
Zebul's craft and Gaal's ambition were only two items on a longer list of what was wrong with Israel at the time.
Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Internal quarrels, treacheries and struggles for supremacy troubled the camp of Israel when the testimony of God had left it. So did grape harvests that ended in drunken hilarity, and drunkenness venting itself in curses. So did the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul and the violence of Abimelech. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred; but the Lord, in His grace, caused a ray of light to shine in the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony, and we may say that with confidence as we pass through difficult times. Even if only one witness is left for God in this world, may we be that one — that despised Jotham, the last of all, but standing firm for God.
The city that took Gaal in did not stand behind him.
The men of Shechem receive a rival to Abimelech. They receive him in a half-hearted way, and then thrust him out to meet Abimelech, who puts him to flight. The men of Shechem are still at enmity with Abimelech, so he comes into open conflict with them and overthrows them.
Neither man at the gate controls this morning. Both are working out what Jotham had already said would happen.
Fire came out from the men of Shechem as Jotham prophesied, to devour Abimelech. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He caused them to curse Abimelech and rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo. At first he seemed to carry everything before him. But God had decreed his destruction.
- Boast. Gaal's power was in his mouth. He asked who Abimelech was that anyone should serve him, and promised to remove him if the city were his.
- Blind spot. Zebul's answer at the gate was not a report but a distraction. He called an advancing army nothing more than shadows.
- Bind. Gaal had committed himself, and could do nothing else. When the taunt came, he had to fight on Abimelech's timing, with an army gathered on short notice.
- Betrayal. Shechem took him up half-heartedly, pushed him out to face Abimelech, and let Abimelech put him to flight.
- Background. Jotham's word stood behind all the craft and ambition. Abimelech seemed to carry everything before him, but God had already decreed his destruction — and God never left Himself without a witness.
And Gaal spoke again, and said, Behold, people are coming down from the high part of the land, and one company is coming along by the way of the Magician's oak.
Gaal has led a revolt in Shechem and challenged Abimelech in public. Now he stands at the city gate at dawn, watching movement on the hills. Zebul, Abimelech's officer, stands beside him and says he is only seeing shadows.
The verse is the second half of an argument. Gaal points once at the mountaintops. Zebul tells him it is a trick of the light. Gaal looks again, and now he names two companies and where each one is coming from.
Early in the morning Gaal went out and stood at the entrance to the city gate. He said to Zebul, who was with him, "Look, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains!" Zebul was ready to distract him. He told Gaal that he saw only the shadows of the mountain, which looked like men. But Gaal was watching closely now. He insisted that two companies of people were coming from different directions.
One of the landmarks Gaal names is not neutral scenery. He traces the second company to a tree. Some translations call the spot a "plain," but the word behind it means something else.
Not the 'plain' but the 'oak' of Meonenim, that is, the Enchanter's Oak, or 'the regarders of times,' as the margin note puts it.
The oak carried the name of these men. Here is what they did:
An observer of times had his lucky and unlucky days. Nothing could be started without asking the gods first… Others read omens for the same purpose: to find out the will of their god. Their answers came from thunder, lightning, the clouds, the flight of birds, or the appearance of certain birds.
Gaal's alarm at the gate is the price of an earlier boast. He had promised in public to get rid of Abimelech.
Gaal could then be very bold in asking, "Who is Abimelech and who is Shechem, that we should serve him?" This is only a case of one piece of broken pottery from the earth fighting with another. The proud words fall from his lips: "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech." Then he issued a message for Abimelech to increase his army and come out to battle.
Zebul answers the boast with the boaster's own words, and Gaal is trapped:
Then Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words: "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal had to gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.
There is no hero in this scene. The man watching, the man lying to him, and the man marching down the hills are all cut from the same cloth.
Abimelech was successful; the evil spirit triumphed, but it will never be a spirit of peace among men. Quarrels within, betrayals, and struggles for power troubled the camp of Israel. Grape harvests ended in drunken laughter, and drunkenness poured itself out in curses. Then there was the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the cunning of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech. These were the things that disturbed the camp once the testimony of God had left it.
The split between Abimelech and Shechem was no political accident. God sent it.
God it was, who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was, who rendered again the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who rendered upon the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.
Some writers see a larger picture here, starting from what the two names mean. Commentators differ on how far to press such readings.
Then there is the revolt of Gaal (loathing), the son of Ebed (servitude), and he opposed Abimelech. Something similar happened in the Christian world. Because Rome ruled in a domineering way, people revolted against her. They tried to overthrow the church power that oppressed them. But Gaal's attempt fails. He is overcome. Abimelech and his officer Zebul are victorious.
- Boast. Gaal asked in public, "Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him?" That boast is why he now stands at the gate with nothing ready.
- Blind. Zebul called the advancing men shadows on the hills. Gaal saw them clearly only on the second look, and by then it was too late.
- Bound. He had committed himself and could do nothing else. Words spoken in confidence become chains when the test arrives.
- Backdrop. The landmark he names is the Enchanter's Oak. The ground already carried the name of men who read omens instead of asking God.
- Behind. God sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and Shechem. The quarrel Gaal exploited was the opening move of a judgment neither side escaped.
Then said Zebul to him, Where is now thy mouth, thou that saidst, Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him? is not this the people that thou hast despised? go out now, I pray, and fight against them.
Gaal had mocked Abimelech in public, asking who he was that anyone should serve him. Now Abimelech's men are coming down the hillsides in full view, and Zebul stands at the gate beside Gaal and hands the boast straight back.
The taunt comes at the end of a short exchange at the city gate.
Zebul was ready to put Gaal off, and told him he was only seeing the shadows of the mountain, as if they were men. But Gaal was watching closely now. He insisted that two companies of men were coming from different directions. Then Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words, "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. They were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal had to gather his army at short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.
The taunt bites because Gaal had said more than he could back up.
Gaal could then be very bold in asking, "Who is Abimelech and who is Shechem, that we should serve him?" This is only a case of one potsherd of the earth striving with another. The proud words fall from his lips: "If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech." Then he sent a message telling Abimelech to build up his army and come out to battle.
Gaal was no deliverer. He saw an opening and took it. The men who had made Abimelech king now celebrated his rival.
Another man, Gaal the son of Ebed, was ready to take advantage of the situation. He came to Shechem and won over the confidence of the Shechemites. He was a similar character to Abimelech, aspiring to have all authority in his hands. To celebrate Gaal's promotion, the people gathered grapes from their vineyards and pressed out the juice. Then they went into the house of their idol, eating and drinking and cursing Abimelech. Such is the folly of men of the world.
Some writers also find meaning in the names of the men involved.
Perhaps we may see in Gaal, the son of Ebed, the "loathing" bred of "servitude." That is in fact the translation of his name. It is this loathing that stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the man they first lifted into power. No wonder the descendants of the "wild ass" (Hamor) rebel against a yoke as harsh as the one they had put their own necks into! But escaping from it is another matter. Zebul, whose character all through is craft, is Abimelech's officer, there to keep the city in obedience.
The rebellion that Gaal exploited did not begin with him.
Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God stepped in, moving the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward him. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer the results of working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but they had no loyalty to him. So they were willing to remove him.
Gaal's rebellion is one link in a chain. It ends with Abimelech dead, and neither side escapes.
Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham prophesied. Gaal the son of Ebed gained the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He caused them to curse Abimelech and to rebel against him. So fire comes out from the false king in turn, to devour them and the house of Millo. At first he seemed to sweep everything before him. But God had decreed his destruction.
The whole ugly episode grows from one root: a people who had put their confidence in a man instead of God.
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable — and to beware most of all when it is a question of God's things.
- Words. Gaal's bold question was his own. Zebul only had to repeat it, and it became the charge against him.
- Weight. The boast carried no weight. The quarrel was "one potsherd of the earth striving with another" — two broken bits of pottery, two men out for themselves.
- Wiles. Zebul's part is craft from start to finish. He stalled Gaal at the gate, then turned on him.
- Working. God moved the Shechemites against Abimelech. Both partners in wickedness reaped what they had sown together.
- Warning. The chapter's harvest of bitterness teaches us to beware of trusting in man, above all in the things of God.
And Gaal went out before the citizens of Shechem, and fought against Abimelech.
Gaal had won Shechem's loyalty and mocked Abimelech from a safe distance. Now Abimelech's troops are at the city, and two questions arise: how did Shechem's new leader get trapped, and who was really behind the quarrel?
Gaal did not plan this fight, and neither did the leaders of Shechem who marched out with him. Zebul stood beside him at the gate and threw Gaal's own words back at him as the troops came into view.
Then Zebul taunted Gaal with the reminder of his words, "Who is Abimelech... that we should serve him?" He told him these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal must gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself: he could do nothing else.
Shechem did not swap a tyrant for a deliverer.
Another man, Gaal, the son of Ebed, was ready to take advantage of the situation, and coming to Shechem, won over the confidence of the Shechemites. He was a similar character to Abimelech, aspiring to have all authority in his hands.
So neither side here holds the higher ground. Gaal's own words show what drove him.
This is only a case of one piece of broken pottery fighting with another, and the proud words fall from his lips, "Would that this people were under my hand! Then I would remove Abimelech."
Abimelech's army arrived at dawn for a reason. The ruler of the city had been feeding him information while pretending to back the rebellion.
However, Zebul, the ruler of the city, did not sympathize with Gaal, though he had clearly kept quiet. He sent secret messengers to Abimelech to warn him of what Gaal was doing. He advised him to take his army by night and wait in the field outside the city, ready to attack the city in the morning.
Some commentators read the whole chapter as a picture of a later religious power, and Zebul's craft has a place in that reading.
Zebul's character throughout is one of craft, and he is Abimelech's officer, there to keep the city in obedience. He may well represent the show of holiness that a power like Rome knows so well how to use when it enforces its claims.
This battle is not a random breakdown of order. Shechem had already been warned that the bramble they trusted would end up burning them.
The cedars of Lebanon were to fall before the bramble's fire! In saying that, an element of prophecy appears. The men of Shechem and others began by putting their trust in the wicked upstart Abimelech. But very soon an evil spirit sprang up between the two parties. It ended in fire from Abimelech consuming the men of Shechem and their tower, and in the destruction of Abimelech himself.
The quarrel had a cause deeper than politics.
God it was, who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was, who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God, who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous.
Read as a whole, the chapter shows what fills a nation once God's testimony has left it. It also shows what God still looks for: one faithful witness.
These were the things that troubled the camp of Israel when the testimony of God had left it: internal quarrels, treacheries, struggles for power, grape harvests that ended in drunken laughter, drunkenness finding its outlet in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech... And if there is, as here, only a single witness left for God in this world, may we be that one. May we be that despised Jotham — the last of all, but standing firm for God.
- Boast — Gaal boasted that he would remove Abimelech. His own words dragged him into a fight he was not ready for.
- Mirror — Shechem traded one grasping man for another. It was one piece of broken pottery striking another.
- Craft — the man at Gaal's side was Abimelech's informer. Loyalty on the outside, betrayal underneath — that is how such power keeps its grip.
- Fire — Jotham had warned that the bramble's fire would burn the trees that trusted it, and the bramble too. This battle is where that burning starts.
- Witness — when God's testimony leaves a people, ambition, treachery and violence fill the gap. The call is to be the one person still standing for God.
And Abimelech pursued him, and he fled before him, and there fell many wounded, as far as the entrance of the gate.
Shechem made Abimelech king, and then turned on him. The fighting came to a head outside the city wall. Gaal marched out, Abimelech chased him down, and the wounded lay all the way back to the gate. It reads like a plain battle report. Commentators press two questions. Why did Gaal fight at all? And whose hand drove the slaughter?
Gaal had boasted that Abimelech was nobody worth serving. When Abimelech's men came into view, Zebul threw that boast back at him.
Zebul taunted Gaal by reminding him of his own words: "Who is Abimelech that we should serve him?" He told him that these were the very people he had despised. Now they were ready to fight before Gaal was, and Gaal had to gather his army on short notice. But he had committed himself. He could do nothing else.
The chase stops at the city entrance. What follows for Gaal is not death in battle but quiet removal, and then silence.
Abimelech had the stronger army and the advantage of surprise. He crushed Gaal's followers, and many fell wounded. But at this point Abimelech withdrew to Arumah, while Zebul drove Gaal and his brothers out of Shechem. This was in fact better for Gaal, since he would probably have been killed if he had stayed in Shechem. Nothing more is said about what happened to him after this.
The man who wanted Abimelech's throne leaves the story without an ending.
Some commentators read the two rivals as a pattern. A people lift a man to power, then turn against him. The names, they say, hold the clue.
In Gaal, the son of Ebed, we may perhaps see the "loathing" bred by "servitude" — that is in fact what his name means. It is this loathing that stirs the nations to throw off their loyalty to the very one they first lifted into power. No wonder the descendants of the "wild ass" rebel against a yoke as harsh as the one they had put their own necks into! But escaping from it is another matter.
This is an application, not the plain sense of the text. Other writers stay with the history and draw the lesson from the events.
Abimelech is winning here. Commentators see Jotham's word coming true in that very success. Fire comes out from the king to devour the men who made him. But the win does not save him.
Fire came out from the men of Shechem to devour Abimelech, just as Jotham prophesied. Gaal the son of Ebed won the confidence of the treacherous Shechemites. He made them curse Abimelech and rebel against him. So fire comes out in turn from the false king, to devour them and the house of Millo. At first he seemed to carry all before him. But God had decreed his destruction.
The same writer follows the story to its end.
The power that makes Abimelech is not the power that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez.
Why were Gaal and Abimelech fighting each other at all? One writer traces the quarrel itself back to God, and calls that righteous.
It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought all their evil back on the heads of the men of Shechem. And we may ask, in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" Indeed He is not. He is very righteous.
Taken as a whole, the chapter shows what a people become when the testimony of God has left them. Yet one witness remained.
Quarrels among themselves, betrayals, struggles for the top place, grape harvests that ended in drunken partying, drunkenness that poured itself out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the advice of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech — these were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel, once the testimony of God had left it... And if only a single witness is left for God in this world, as here, may we be that one.
- Boast — Gaal's loud words about Abimelech left him no way out; he had to fight on someone else's timing.
- Rout — the wounded lay all the way to the gate. Zebul then drove Gaal out, and nothing more is said of him.
- Rival — Gaal's name speaks of the loathing bred by servitude. That loathing throws off a yoke, but it does not escape it.
- Win — at first Abimelech carried all before him. But the power that made him could not unmake him; a woman's hand awaited him at Thebez.
- Hand — God Himself was behind the quarrel, and He repaid both sides. Even when everything has collapsed, it is worth being the one witness left for Him.
And Abimelech dwelt at Arumah. And Zebul drove out Gaal and his brethren, that they might not dwell in Shechem.
Abimelech's men have beaten Gaal's followers in the field. He now pulls back to Arumah while his officer Zebul clears Gaal out of Shechem, and the revolt looks finished — yet the city that crowned Abimelech still stands, and Jotham's words are not finished with it.
The two sides now pull apart. Abimelech withdraws, and Zebul finishes the work inside the city. Gaal loses everything here, and one writer counts that loss as his rescue.
Abimelech's army was stronger, and it had the element of surprise. It crushed the followers of Gaal, and many fell wounded. But at this time Abimelech withdrew to Arumah, while Zebul drove Gaal and his brothers from Shechem. Actually, it was better for Gaal that they did this, for he likely would have been killed if remaining in Shechem. The account says nothing, though, about what happened to him after this.
Arumah itself is a small detail with no story attached to it — reference works can say little more than where it sat.
City or district apparently near Shechem, the home of Abimelech. Judges 9:41.
The rebellion breaks up inside the city as much as on the battlefield. One writer shows Jotham's words coming true in both directions.
The details show us how this prophecy of Jotham's came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech, and fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem. The men of Shechem receive a rival to Abimelech. They receive him in a half-hearted way, and then thrust him out to meet Abimelech, who puts him to flight. The men of Shechem are still at enmity with Abimelech, and he is put into open conflict with them, and overthrows them.
The two names in this verse have been read as a description of what was really going on. Gaal's very name is said to spell out the mood that started the rebellion, and the outcome of it.
Then there is the revolt of Gaal (loathing), the son of Ebed (servitude), and he opposed Abimelech. Something similar happened later in the Christian world. Rome ruled in a domineering way, and people revolted against her. They tried to overthrow this church oppressor. But Gaal's attempt fails. He is overcome. Abimelech and his officer Zebul are victorious. The revolt has failed.
Zebul does the expelling here. Another writer weighs his methods across the whole chapter, and reads the detail of the story as pointing beyond one small town.
The story is told with such full detail that there is much more in it than the affairs of one small Israelite city; yet the commentators treat it as little more than that. Nor can we expect full light on it all at once... Zebul's character all through is craft, and he is Abimelech's officer, there to keep the city obedient. He may easily stand for the apparent holiness that a power like Rome knows so well how to use to enforce its claims.
Commentators differ on how far to press a picture like this.
Settling at Arumah left Shechem unpunished, and within a day Abimelech was back. His treatment of the city exposes what his earlier appeal to kinship had been worth.
Abimelech had not yet captured the city of Shechem. For some reason people were coming out of it the next day. He heard this and approached the city with three companies, lying in wait... All that day Abimelech fought against the city. He took it and tore it down. He sowed it with salt, so that nothing fruitful would grow there. He had told the Shechemites before that he was their flesh and blood, and had won their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!
Abimelech's early success was real. It settled nothing about how he would end.
Accordingly fire comes out from the false king to devour them and the house of Millo, and he seemed at first to carry all before him. But God had decreed his destruction.
Shechem's earlier crime explains why God allowed him these victories. God, not an enemy army, then fixed the limit.
The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God used Abimelech's anger to display the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger. God brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved.
- Chosen — Shechem crowned Abimelech, then welcomed Gaal half-heartedly as a rival. Crowds that make a leader can unmake him.
- Loathed — Gaal's name means loathing, and his father's name means servitude. People who lift a harsh ruler into power soon turn on him.
- Expelled — Zebul, a man of craft, drives Gaal out. Losing the city likely saved Gaal's life, and the account says no more about him.
- Paused — Arumah is not rest. Shechem still stood, and the next day Abimelech destroyed the very kin he had once claimed in order to win them.
- Judged — Abimelech seemed to carry all before him. But God had already decreed his end. God used his anger to punish Shechem, then held back the rest.
And it came to pass on the morrow, that the people went out into the field; and they told Abimelech.
The day after Abimelech put a rival to flight, life in Shechem looked normal again. People walked out to their fields, and word of it reached Abimelech, camped nearby. That small report ended in the ruin of a whole city. It also raises the question the chapter keeps pressing: who is directing this war between a king and the people who made him king?
One writer follows what Abimelech did with that report:
The city of Shechem had not yet fallen, and for some reason people were coming out of it the next day. Abimelech heard this (v. 42) and with three companies approached the city, lying in wait. When he saw people coming out of the city he attacked. One company took the city gate. The other companies destroyed those who had come out (vv. 43-44). Abimelech fought against the city all that day. He overcame it and tore it down, and sowed it with salt so that nothing useful would grow there (v. 45). Earlier he had told the people of Shechem that he was their own flesh and blood (v. 2), and so won their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!
Taking the gate left the people in the field with nowhere to run back to.
Abimelech had first won Shechem by appealing to family ties. Another writer names what came in with him:
In Judges 8 we saw the people of Israel wanting to hand authority to their leader. Here a wolf takes the Shepherd's place and grabs the flock to eat it... He used the brothers of his mother, who was Gideon's concubine, to win over the men of Shechem by posing as their brother. They trusted this traitor. Their moral state was so low that they even forgot the bond that tied them to all Israel, and said of Abimelech: "He is our brother." For them, brotherhood had lost its true meaning. It had become only a label for one party.
The split between Abimelech and Shechem did not start with either side. One writer says who started it, and why:
After Abimelech had reigned only three years, God intervened by moving the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the man's arrogance had become too much for them. But God meant both them and Abimelech to suffer the consequences of joining together in wickedness (vv. 23-24).
Another writer puts it more bluntly, naming God as the actor at each turn:
It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who paid Abimelech back for his wickedness. It was God who brought all their evil back on the heads of the men of Shechem. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous who takes vengeance?" No, He is not. He is very righteous.
Earlier, Jotham had said that fire would come out from each side and burn up the other. One writer traces how that word came true:
...the details show us how this prophecy of Jotham's came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and burns up Abimelech. Fire comes out from Abimelech and burns up the men of Shechem. The men of Shechem take in a rival to Abimelech. They receive him half-heartedly, then push him out to face Abimelech, who puts him to flight. The men of Shechem are still hostile to Abimelech. He is brought into open conflict with them, and he overthrows them.
So Abimelech's victory served a purpose that was not his own, and it had a limit:
The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's rage show the justice of His own repayment. But when Abimelech tried to go further than that, God held back the rest of his rage and brought on him the miserable destruction he had earned. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and that curse came true.
- Shared guilt. Shechem and Abimelech were partners in the murder of Gideon's sons, so both were marked for the same judgment.
- Division. God moved the Shechemites to turn on the king they had made — the first step of judgment was not an army but a quarrel.
- Ambush. One report was enough. Three companies, the gate seized, the city levelled and sown with salt.
- Kinship betrayed. They called him "our brother"; he destroyed his own flesh and blood — a wolf in the Shepherd's place.
- Limit. God used Abimelech's rage as far as justice needed, then held it back and turned it on his own head. Jotham's words came true to the letter.
And he took the people, and divided them into three companies, and lay in ambush in the field. And he looked, and behold, the people came forth out of the city; and he rose up against them and smote them.
Abimelech now turns his army on Shechem, the very city that made him king. He splits his men, hides them in the open fields, and cuts down the townspeople as they walk out of their gate. Commentators press a moral question rather than a military one: who stands behind a slaughter like this?
One writer walks through the ambush company by company. He also names who Abimelech was killing.
The city of Shechem had not been captured, and for some reason people were coming from the city the next day. Abimelech heard this (v. 42). He came near the city with three companies and lay in wait. When he saw people coming out of the city he attacked. One company took the gate of the city, while the other companies destroyed those who had come out (vv. 43-44). He had told the Shechemites before that he was their flesh and blood (v. 2), and so won their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!
The men Abimelech ambushed were not innocent. They had shared in his earlier crime, and one writer sees God's own hand behind the whole thing — and a limit set to it.
The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's wrath show the justice of His retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his wrath, and brought on him the miserable destruction he fully deserved.
At this point Abimelech looks unstoppable. One writer shows that his early success was not the end of the story.
Fire comes out from the false king to devour the men of Shechem and the house of Millo, and at first he appeared to carry all before him. But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and the final victory looked all but sure. Then a woman threw a piece of millstone on Abimelech's head and broke his skull. God is not restricted to means. He Who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use the same kind of instrument here, when everything else had failed.
One writer gathers this ambush with the other betrayals of the chapter into a single list. He traces them all to a people who had lost God's testimony, yet he still finds one ray of light.
Internal quarrels, treacheries, struggles for power, drunken grape harvests, drunkenness that broke out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech — these were the things that troubled the camp of Israel. They came in when the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, of slaughter, and of hatred. But Jehovah, in His grace, caused a ray of light to shine in the middle of the darkness.
Jotham's parable had already called Abimelech a bramble. This ambush is the harvest of that choice, and one writer draws the lesson about trusting man.
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly, and teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable, Judges 9 — and especially so when it is a question of God's things.
Another writer turns the same warning on us, and on any wish for a place above God's people.
Let us not be seeking a place. Let us not be like Abimelech. He wanted to step into the empty chair of the man before him — a chair his own father had refused. Let us not seek to be Abimelechs in any sense of the word. Whether it is one man or a dozen makes no difference. The principle is the same. Wherever there is a spirit of succession, wherever people think that certain men are rulers and will stay rulers despite anything in themselves or in the saints, you may be sure it is the bramble. It is what has no fruit for God.
- Crowned — Shechem made Abimelech king as their own flesh and blood. Here he ambushes and kills that same flesh and blood.
- Chastised — the ambush is God's government at work. He used Abimelech to punish men who had shared in the murder of Gideon's sons.
- Contained — God made Abimelech's rage show His justice. Then He held back the rest of it and destroyed him when he pushed further.
- Crushed — the man who seemed to carry all before him fell under a piece of millstone thrown by a woman. God is not restricted to means.
- Cautioned — do not trust the bramble, and do not become one. Whoever craves a place over God's people has no fruit for God.
And Abimelech, and the companies that were with him, rushed forward, and stood in the entrance of the gate of the city; and two of the companies ran upon all that were in the fields, and slew them.
Judges 9 follows Gideon's death: his son Abimelech killed his brothers to seize power, the men of Shechem backed him, and three years later the alliance broke into war. Verse 44 is the moment the war turns, and it raises two hard questions: why did God allow it, and what did Abimelech win?
The attack in this verse is planned, not a chance clash. One commentator walks through the movements and then points to the irony in them.
The city of Shechem had not been captured, and for some reason people were coming out of the city the next day. Abimelech heard this and with three companies approached the city, lying in wait. When he saw people coming out of the city he attacked. One company occupied the gate of the city. The other companies destroyed those who had come out. All that day Abimelech fought against the city. He overcame it and demolished it, sowing it with salt to make it unfit for bearing fruitful plants. He had told the Shechemites before that he was their flesh and blood, and gained their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!
The quarrel between Abimelech and Shechem did not begin with either of them.
Abimelech had reigned only three years. Then God intervened. He moved the men of Shechem to change their attitude toward Abimelech. No doubt the arrogance of the man had proven too much for them. But God intended that both they and Abimelech should suffer for working together in wickedness. They had made Abimelech king, but had no sense of loyalty to him, so were willing to depose him.
Jotham was the one brother who escaped Abimelech's killing of his family. He left a prophecy behind him, and the slaughter in the field is part of its outcome.
I will not go into the details. They are very interesting and profitable reading, and they show us how this prophecy of Jotham's came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech. Fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem. The men of Shechem take in a rival to Abimelech. They welcome him half-heartedly, then push him out to meet Abimelech, who puts him to flight. The men of Shechem are still hostile to Abimelech, and he is brought into open conflict with them, and overthrows them. They flee to their tower. He brings branches of these very trees — brings his brother's parable, we might say — sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.
If God stirred the quarrel, is He implicated in the bloodshed? One writer answers by naming God as the actor at every stage — and refuses to apologise for it.
God it was who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. God it was who paid back the wickedness of Abimelech. God it was who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. ... Modern teaching in these later days has produced a corrupted and soft religion. It flinches at the bare idea of God using His holy government to carry out justice. He goes on carrying it out all the same.
Verse 44 is Abimelech at his most effective. It is also the start of his end.
It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. In the story in Judges, the millstone is the cause of Abimelech's destruction; yet it is character that brings destruction from God.
The chapter as a whole shows what Israel had become, and what God still kept alive in it.
Internal quarrels, betrayals, struggles for power, grape harvests that ended in drunken partying, drunkenness that broke out in curses, the ambition of Gaal, the counsels of Ebed, the craft of Zebul, the violence of Abimelech — these were the troubles that disturbed the camp of Israel once the testimony of God had left it. It became a scene of sorrow, slaughter, and hatred. But Jehovah, in His grace, made a ray of light shine in the darkness. He does not leave Himself without testimony.
- Sown — Shechem crowned a man who had murdered his brothers. God Himself stirred the falling-out, so that both partners in that crime would reap it.
- Sprung — The trap at the gate and in the field is Jotham's warning coming true: fire out of Abimelech, burning the men who lit him.
- Seized — He took the city, levelled it, and salted the ground. The man who called Shechem his own flesh and blood then destroyed it.
- Spent — The power that made him could not keep him. He wins at Shechem only to die at Thebez under a woman's millstone.
- Shown — Where God's testimony is gone, a people turns to treachery, slaughter and hatred. Yet God never leaves Himself without a witness.
And Abimelech fought against the city all that day; and he took the city, and slew the people that were in it, and broke down the city, and sowed it with salt.
Shechem made Abimelech king; now he tears that same city down, kills its people and scatters salt over the ruins. Two questions follow: why he turned on the city that crowned him, and what the salt meant.
The salt was aimed at the ground itself. The ruin fell on the very people who had first backed him.
All that day Abimelech fought against the city, overcame it and demolished it, sowing it with salt to make it unfit for bearing fruitful vegetation (v. 45). He had told the Shechemites before that he was their flesh and blood (v. 2) and won their support. Now he has no hesitation in destroying his own flesh and blood!
Salt appears in the offerings and in covenants. It also appears in judgments, and this verse is on that list.
It was used in the grain offering, and in other offerings (Lev. 2:13), also in connection with covenants (Num. 18:19; 2 Chr. 13:5, etc.); and in judgments (Gen. 14:3; Deut. 29:2; Judges 9:45; Jer. 17:6). These uses powerfully declare the lasting nature of the truth that salt pictures.
God had already warned Israel about salted ground. The New Testament picks up salt again, this time as a warning about people rather than soil.
In the same way, the Lord declared what would happen if Israel rebelled and fell under the curse. Their whole ground would be brimstone and salt, like the overthrow of Sodom (Deuteronomy 29:23). The New Testament adds the terrible picture of salt that loses its taste. Such salt is no use for the land or for the manure heap, so it is thrown out.
Jotham had prophesied against Abimelech and the men of Shechem. Verse 45 is one half of it coming true.
I will not go into the details, though they make very interesting and profitable reading. They show us how Jotham's prophecy came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech, and fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem... When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees — the parable of his brother, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower and burns up those who had sided with his rival.
One rule explains how Abimelech's story ends, and it holds for everyone.
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when anyone uses such a thing for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of God's retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap: if he sows to the flesh, of the flesh he reaps corruption.
His victory here did not secure him. The force that put him on top could not keep him there.
It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. Here the millstone reminds us of Babylon's overthrow. In Revelation 18:21 the New Testament takes up the symbol the Old Testament prophet used.
Jotham took no part in the fighting. He left for Beer, a name that means "a well."
He cannot join in all this conflict and strife, so he flees to Beer and dwells there. Beer is "a well," and he dwells by the well, while the people of God carry on their ugly strife over authority. He drinks from the fountain of the word of God, the only place that gives strength and refreshment.
- Sown. Abimelech used his father's reputation for himself, and what a man sows he must reap.
- Reaped. He levels the city that crowned him, destroying his own flesh and blood without hesitation.
- Salted. Salt marks a judgment meant to last. The ground is left barren, like the curse God warned rebellious Israel about.
- Spent. The power that made him could not unmake him; he prevails at Shechem only to die at Thebez.
- Spared. Jotham left the strife and lived by the well. He drank from God's word while king and city destroyed each other.
And all the men of the tower of Shechem heard [that], and they entered into the stronghold of the house of the god Berith.
Shechem lies in ruins. The men of its tower need somewhere to hide, and the place they pick is the temple of their god. The verse asks the question the whole chapter has been building toward. What happens when the only refuge left to you is one you invented?
These men were not inside the city. They moved only after news of Shechem's fall reached them. One commentator links their choice of hiding place to an earlier refusal:
But the men of the tower of Shechem were clearly not in the city of Shechem. When they heard of Shechem's fall, they gathered in a stronghold inside the temple of an idol, Berith (v. 46). What else could they do, when they had refused God as their stronghold?
Their god carries the name Berith. Israel had turned to Baal-Berith as soon as Gideon died, and one commentator explains what that name means:
As soon as Gideon died, Israel went back to worshipping the Baals as idols, and above all Baal-Berith, which means "lord of the covenant." This shows Israel sinking to a covenant relationship with God that is not God's covenant at all. It is only a promise to serve the Lord that comes from the flesh. God's covenant with Israel was the law of Moses, but false lords promote a counterfeit covenant.
So these men hid in the house of a covenant god, having already walked away from the real covenant. Another writer traces this Baal worship back to the company Israel had been keeping:
The worship of Baal was at least a sign of a covenant with the Canaanites, whose god he was, and the history here gives clear proof of an alliance with the pagan nations… The Hebrew word used for the "lords" of Shechem is an unusual one, and it keeps coming back (verses 2, 6, 7, 18, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 39, 46, 47, 51). That can hardly be an accident. It probably points to most of them being Canaanites.
An idol temple standing at Shechem is not a neutral detail. This was the location where Israel had once heard God's law read aloud to them:
Idolatry and the reign of Abimelech go together here, as they do in the later fulfillment this history pictures. And Shechem, the very spot where God proclaimed His law, is now the center of falling away from Him.
Jotham had already told them what Abimelech would be worth to them in a crisis. He pictured a thornbush offering shade. One writer weighs what that shade was worth:
The shadow of a bramble! In the heat of Palestine you could hardly imagine anything less protective. And the bramble invited them to trust in that, with the alternative of being devoured!… The men of Shechem and others began by putting their trust in the wicked upstart Abimelech. But very soon an evil spirit sprang up between the two sides, and it ended in fire from Abimelech destroying the men of Shechem and their tower.
The next verses fulfill Jotham's words to the letter. One writer shows how the fire ran both ways:
Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech, and fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem… When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees. He brings his brother's parable with him, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.
The men in this tower had made Abimelech king. Now their king is piling wood against their door. One writer finds here the clearest lesson of Abimelech's whole story:
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anything of that sort is used for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If one thing stands out in his history above all, it is the solemn fact of God's repayment. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.
- Refused. They refused God as their stronghold. So when trouble came, the only place left to run to was an idol's temple.
- Renamed. Berith means "lord of the covenant." It was a counterfeit of the real covenant — a promise to serve that came only from the flesh.
- Relocated. Their false worship sat on the very ground where God once proclaimed His law. A famous holy place guards no one.
- Revealed. Jotham had warned that a thornbush gives no shade. The tower proved him right. Abimelech burned it with branches from the trees of his parable.
- Reaped. The men who crowned Abimelech died by his fire. What a man sows, he must reap — that is the settled way of God.
And it was told Abimelech that all the men of the tower of Shechem had gathered together.
Abimelech has just destroyed Shechem, and the survivors from its tower have crowded into one last stronghold. Word of that gathering reaches him — so where does a people who have rejected God expect to find safety?
The tower was not inside the city, and the place those men ran to was a shrine. One writer notes where they went and why:
But the men of the tower of Shechem were clearly not in the city of Shechem. When news of Shechem's destruction reached them, they gathered in a stronghold at the temple of an idol, Berith (v. 46). What else could they do when they had refused God as a stronghold? Abimelech heard this and led his men to the location.
The god's name carries a meaning. So does the word this verse uses for the "leaders" of the tower:
Israel had once again fallen into idolatry and taken Baal-berith to be their god. The name means "lord of the covenant"... Worshipping Baal was at the very least a sign of a covenant with the Canaanites, since he was their god. The history here gives clear proof of an alliance with the pagan nations... The word used here for "lords" (baale) is unusual in Hebrew, but is "often found in the Phoenician dialect." The way it keeps coming back in this chapter can hardly be an accident. It probably points to most of these men being Canaanites, and it ties them to the Phoenician Baal-worship of Canaan.
The place itself makes this worse. Shechem was the spot where Israel had once heard God's law read out:
So idolatry and the reign of Abimelech belong together here, just as they do in the larger fulfillment this foreshadows. And Shechem — the very spot where the law of Jehovah was proclaimed — is now the center of the nation's turning away from God.
Jotham was Gideon's one surviving son. He had told the men of Shechem a story about trees choosing a king, and the bramble they chose promised them fire. Now Abimelech hears where they are, cuts branches from the trees, and the story closes on itself:
...they show us how Jotham's prophecy came true to the very letter. Fire comes out from the men of Shechem and consumes Abimelech. Fire comes out from Abimelech and consumes the men of Shechem... When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees. He brings his brother's parable with him, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower and burns up those who had sided with his rival.
The bramble in Jotham's story had offered shade. That offer was the whole problem:
In verse 15 we see Jotham as a master of sarcasm and a man of prophetic vision. The shadow of a bramble! In the heat of Palestine you could hardly picture anything that gives less shelter. And the bramble invited them to trust in that, with the alternative of being devoured!... The men of Shechem and others began by putting their trust in the wicked upstart Abimelech. But very soon an evil spirit sprang up between the two sides. It ended with fire from Abimelech destroying the men of Shechem and their tower — and with Abimelech himself destroyed too.
Abimelech acted from spite, yet the burning of that tower was not only his doing. The chapter's own closing verses account for it:
The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God used Abimelech's anger to display the justice of His own judgment. But when Abimelech tried to go further than that, God held back the rest of his anger. God then brought on him the wretched destruction he so fully deserved. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and that curse came true.
Scripture tells these small movements in detail: the gathering, the report, the branches. One writer found that detail far too full for a local feud:
All of this is told in such full detail that there must be far more in it than the affairs of one small Israelite city. Yet commentators treat it as little more than that. Nor can we expect to gain full light on it all at once.
- Refused. These men had turned down God as their stronghold. The only refuge left was a shrine of Baal-berith, "lord of the covenant" — a god borrowed from the Canaanites.
- Reported. Their gathering was no secret. The news went straight to the man who had just destroyed their city, and he came for them.
- Repaid. Abimelech burned them with branches cut from the trees of Jotham's parable. The prophecy came true to the letter.
- Ruled. Behind one man's spite stood God's hand in government. He used Abimelech's anger to repay the accomplices in murder, then stopped him and destroyed him too.
- Refuge. The bramble's shade gave no shelter at all. The question it leaves is simple: what are we sheltering under?
Then Abimelech went up to mount Zalmon, he and all the people that were with him; and Abimelech took an axe in his hand, and cut down a bough from the trees, and took it up and laid it on his shoulder, and said to the people that was with him, What ye have seen me do, make haste, do as I have done.
Abimelech is at war with the men of Shechem, and here he shows his soldiers how to burn down the tower they are hiding in. About a thousand people will die in that fire, so the commentators ask what kind of man gave the order — and whose judgment was at work.
One dictionary connects the name with Salmon, and places the hill near the fighting.
Salmon is perhaps the same as Mount Zalmon in Judges 9:48, the Hebrew being the same, a wooded mountain near Shechem.
The trees were near at hand. Abimelech did not need to plan a siege; he only needed an axe and a slope full of timber.
His brother Jotham had already described him in a story about trees.
The trees elect a bramble bush to rule them. The bramble's answer is very significant: "If I am to be ruler, then you have either got to bow to me, or fire will come out and burn up all the trees, from the cedar of Lebanon in its height down to the smallest of them." It is rule or ruin.
So the axe on Zalmon is in character. This was also a deliberate turn away from the man who raised him.
Abimelech did not only forget his father's example. He deliberately chose the opposite path of proud self-pleasing.
Gideon's example pointed one way. His son led a crowd up a hill to burn a tower full of people.
There is a sharp irony in the material he chose. Jotham's parable had been about trees; now trees are the weapon.
When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees — brings the parable of his brother, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.
The words "do as I have done" gave the order. His brother had drawn the picture first.
The people he attacked had already chosen a refuge of their own.
When they heard that Shechem had been destroyed they gathered in a stronghold of a temple of an idol, Berith (v. 46). What else could they do when they had refused God as a stronghold? Abimelech heard this and led his men to the location. They cut down branches of trees and used these to set a fire. The fire burned into the stronghold and destroyed it, killing about one thousand men and women.
They had made Abimelech king and then turned on him. When the fire came, the idol's temple gave them no shelter.
Read on its own, the scene looks like one strong man getting his way. The commentators read it as the settling of an account.
So the first part of Jotham's parable was fulfilled: fire came out from Abimelech and consumed the men of Shechem (v. 20), those who had made Abimelech king. This was an awesome judgment of the city and the tower of Shechem!
And the limit set on Abimelech's success is as telling as the success itself.
The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to chastise them as they deserved. So God made the wrath of Abimelech praise the justice of divine retribution. But when he tried to go beyond this, God restrained the rest of his wrath and brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved.
God used the man who gave the orders on Zalmon, and then judged him too.
- Axe. Zalmon was a wooded hill near Shechem. The weapon was whatever grew on the slope — an axe, and a crowd willing to copy their leader.
- Example. Abimelech turned from his father's path to proud self-pleasing. A bramble ruler leaves two options: bow, or burn.
- Fire. The branches he carried were the very picture from Jotham's parable, now set against the door of the tower.
- Refuge. The men of Shechem had refused God as a stronghold, so they crowded into an idol's temple — and a thousand died there.
- Reckoning. Fire from Abimelech consumed those who had crowned him, just as Jotham's parable said. God used that wrath to punish their guilt, then stopped him and destroyed him.
And all the people likewise cut down every man his bough, and they followed Abimelech, and put [them] to the hold, and burned the hold with fire upon them. And all the men of the tower of Shechem died also, about a thousand men and women.
About a thousand men and women die in a single fire at Shechem, killed by the man they themselves had crowned. Two questions press on the verse. Why did they die in that particular building? And whose hand was behind the flames?
The people who died here were not caught in the open. They had run to the safest place they knew — a stronghold attached to the temple of their god, Berith. One writer traces what happened from the moment Shechem fell:
But the men of the tower of Shechem were evidently not in the city of Shechem. When they heard that Shechem had been destroyed they gathered in a stronghold of a temple of an idol, Berith. What else could they do when they had refused God as a stronghold? Abimelech heard this and led his men to the location. They cut down branches of trees. With these they set a fire that burned into the stronghold and destroyed it, killing about one thousand men and women. So the first part of Jotham's parable was fulfilled: fire came out from Abimelech and consumed the men of Shechem, those who had made Abimelech king.
The god whose temple they hid in had a name with a meaning of its own. And the place had once stood for something very different:
Israel had once again lapsed into idolatry, and taken Baal-berith to be their god. The words mean "lord of the covenant"... Idolatry and the reign of Abimelech are connected; and Shechem, at the very spot where the law of the Lord was proclaimed, is now the centre of apostasy.
Jotham had told the men of Shechem a story about trees. It ended with a thorn-bush that threatened to burn everything around it. One writer watches that story come back on them:
The details show us how this prophecy of Jotham's was fulfilled to the very letter... When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees. He brings his brother's parable, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.
The parable threatened the king as well as the people. One writer traces what happens when people put a ruler in God's place:
The tendency of man's heart is to make another king than God, and to put leaders in His place. This destroys the use and blessing for which God gives the olive, the fig, the vine, and all His various gifts... Royalty comes naturally to the thorn-bush. It needs to give up nothing, but it has nothing in its gift but thorns. But worse would come than this. The fire of God's wrath would come from this side and from that, and destroy both king and people.
Abimelech had built his career on his father's name. One writer finds in his story a principle that holds far beyond it:
In the case of Abimelech it is seen most clearly... In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when anything of that sort serves self and not God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If anything in his history stands out above the rest, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.
A thousand people die and Abimelech walks away the winner. Reading the chapter to its end, one writer shows God using him and then stopping him:
The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's anger serve the justice of divine retribution. But when he tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger. He brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse, and it was fulfilled.
- Refuge — They ran to an idol's temple for safety. They had already refused God as their stronghold.
- Fire — The boughs that burned the tower came from the very trees of Jotham's parable. His word was fulfilled to the letter.
- Both ways — The fire ran in two directions: at the people who crowned a thorn-bush, and at the thorn-bush itself.
- Harvest — Abimelech traded on his father's reputation for his own ends. What a man sows he must reap.
- Government — God used Abimelech's anger to repay Shechem for its share in murder. Then He stopped him short and destroyed him.
And Abimelech went to Thebez, and encamped against Thebez, and took it.
Abimelech has just burned the tower of Shechem. The march on Thebez is his next move: one more city, one more siege, one more easy win. What the verse does not tell you is that this is the last thing he will ever do successfully.
Abimelech's career began with a name he had not earned. God had used his father Gideon. The son traded on that reputation for himself, and the chapter records what that cost him.
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anything of the sort is used for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.
Nothing about this siege is new. Abimelech comes to Thebez to repeat Shechem: burn out the people who take shelter in the tower. That repetition is where God stops him.
Then Abimelech goes after another man to another city. There he is seeking to do the same thing, to burn out those who had found shelter in the tower. Then a woman's hand with a piece of millstone makes an end of him — weakness using a simple tool of daily labour, the daily humble work of a weak woman. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech, and all his power with him. It is done by the hand of a woman.
Abimelech does take Thebez. The point is where his winning stops.
But God had decreed his destruction. Abimelech was fighting against the tower of Thebez, with the final victory all but certain, when "a woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use similar means here, when everything else had proved useless.
The instrument matters as much as the outcome:
Again a woman became the vessel of God's power, and a worthless fragment of a once useful millstone became the instrument.
The end of Judges 9 looks back over the whole campaign, including this march on Thebez.
The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the justice of divine repayment. But when he tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger and brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved.
Shechem had made him; Shechem could not save him.
It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez.
The siege left no one on either side untouched.
City in Ephraim. Abimelech took it, except for the tower. A piece of a millstone thrown from that tower killed him. So the besieged and the besieger were all punished in their sin.
Shechem had made him; Shechem could not save him. One writer reads the millstone itself as a symbol:
It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. Here the millstone reminds us of Babylon's overthrow. In Revelation 18:21 the New Testament takes up the symbol used by the Old Testament prophet. There Babylon herself is pictured by the millstone, as the hard and merciless grinder of God's wheat. In the story in Judges, the millstone is the cause of Abimelech's destruction. Yet these two things are almost one: it is character that brings destruction from God. And the woman's hand — what is it but the Church of God? Her cries have gone up to God, and in this way she brings the punishment. The millstone and the woman's hand are complementary thoughts that complete the picture.
- Borrowed glory. Abimelech built on his father's reputation but used it for himself. What a man sows he must reap.
- Repeated method. Thebez is Shechem all over again: same tower, same fire, same plan. That repetition is where God stops him.
- Interrupted victory. The city falls and the win looks certain. God's decree of destruction lands at the top of his success, not in defeat.
- Weak instrument. A woman's hand and a broken millstone finish what armies could not. God is not limited to the means men respect.
- Fixed limit. God used Abimelech's rage to repay Shechem. When he pushed past that line, God turned the rest of that rage on his own head.
But there was a strong tower in the midst of the city, and thither fled all the men and women, all the citizens of the city; and they shut it behind them, and went up to the roof of the tower.
At Shechem, Abimelech burned a tower full of people. Now the whole of Thebez — men, women and leaders — has shut itself inside a second tower and climbed to the roof.
Abimelech's plan at Thebez was the one that had worked at Shechem: burn the tower with the people inside. The roof they climb to in this verse is where the stone that stopped him came from:
Abimelech, confident from his victories, then went on to Thebez and took the city. But the people of the city escaped to a strong tower and barred it against him (v. 51). Again Abimelech meant to burn this tower, but he made the mistake of going too close. A woman in the tower (her name unknown) dropped a large millstone from the top of the tower onto Abimelech's head, crushing his skull.
Earlier in the chapter a man named Jotham had spoken a parable against Abimelech and the men of Shechem. One writer shows the judgment falling in both directions:
Fire came out from Abimelech and devoured the men of Shechem. But when he thought to do the same to the men of Thebez, no fire came out from him. Instead, a piece of a broken millstone came down from a woman of Thebez and struck him a death-blow. The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the wrath of Abimelech praise the justice of divine retribution. But when he tried to go beyond this, God restrained the rest of his wrath and brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse, which was fulfilled.
Abimelech traded on his father's reputation. One writer reads his fall as a principle, not bad luck:
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anyone uses such a thing for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap.
Nothing had stopped Abimelech so far. The blow came from inside the tower he meant to burn:
But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, with the final victory all but sure, when "a certain woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had proved useless.
Weakness, not strength, ended him:
A woman's hand with a piece of millstone — weakness using a simple tool of daily work — makes an end of him. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech, and all his power with him.
The people of Thebez trusted stone and height. One writer weighs what even a well-defended city is worth on its own:
Jerusalem may yet be rebuilt and fortified so well that people think no one can break in. The sentries may stay on the alert. The city may take every care against attack. But the hardest efforts of human strength and care will be useless unless the Lord keeps the city.
The same picture of a strong tower is used elsewhere of God Himself:
"The Name of the LORD is a strong tower; the righteous man runs into it and is safe." The Name stands for Jehovah Himself. He is the place of refuge, of shelter, protection and safety for all who in faith turn to Him. In Him is our peace and safety. The Hebrew meaning of "is safe" is "set on high." So if we flee to Him and become His, we are lifted high in Him, seated in Christ in heavenly places.
- Tower one: Thebez trusts stone and height. Walls hold only when the Lord keeps the city.
- Tower two: Abimelech trusts his run of victories. That confidence walks him under the wall.
- The blow: a woman drops a millstone, a tool of daily work. God is not limited to the means men expect.
- The principle: what a man sows he reaps. A reputation borrowed for self, not used for God, ends in ruin.
- The refuge: the Name of the LORD is the strong tower that never falls. Whoever runs into it is set on high.
And Abimelech came to the tower, and fought against it, and he drew near to the entrance of the tower to burn it with fire;
Abimelech is at the height of his power, moving from the ruins of Shechem to one last tower at Thebez. The verse catches him at the door with fire in his hand — but who decides how this siege ends?
He had used this method before. At Shechem the people fled to their tower, and he burned the door down on them. His weapon came from his brother Jotham's parable about trees.
When they flee to their tower, he brings branches of these very trees. He brings his brother's parable, we might say. He sets fire to the door of the tower, and burns up those who had sided with his rival.
The verse turns on a single detail: he drew near. He had the city, and his confidence took him one step too far.
Abimelech, in the confidence of conquest, then went on to Thebez and took the city. But the people of the city escaped to a strong tower and barred it against him (v. 51). Again Abimelech meant to burn this tower down. His mistake was going too close.
Abimelech looked certain to win. But God had already decided how this would end, and He was not short of ways to do it.
But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and the final victory looked all but sure. Then "a certain woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had proved useless.
Older translations read "a piece of a millstone" here, which is why writers speak of a broken fragment.
The man at the door had power, and a record of burning people out of towers. What ended him was a tool from an ordinary day's work.
Abimelech goes after another man, to another city. There he tries to do the same thing: to burn out those who had found shelter in the tower. Then a woman's hand with a piece of millstone makes an end of him — weakness using a simple tool of ordinary daily work, the humble daily work of a weak woman. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech and all his power with him. It is done by the hand of a woman.
Note what God chose to use: a woman, and a piece of something already thrown away.
Again a woman became the vessel of God's power, and a worthless fragment of a once useful millstone became the instrument.
God had set a limit to this man. Earlier God used him against men who deserved punishment. When he pushed past that point, God stopped him.
The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the praise of divine justice. But when he tried to go beyond this, God held back the rest of his anger. God brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse, and that curse came true.
The chapter began with people trusting a man. Here the harvest of that choice comes in.
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. That is true above all when it is a question of God's things.
- Approach. Abimelech brings to the tower door the same fire that worked at Shechem. He took the tactic from his own brother's parable.
- Overconfidence. He had taken the city and the victory looked certain. His one error was going too close.
- Decree. His destruction was not an accident of the siege. God had settled it, and He is not limited in the means He uses when everything else has failed.
- Instrument. A woman's hand and a broken piece of millstone — a worn-out tool of daily work — ended the man and all his power.
- Harvest. Jotham's parable held both a prophecy and a curse. Both came true, and trusting a bramble brought a bitter harvest.
and a woman cast the upper stone of a handmill on Abimelech's head, and crushed his skull.
Abimelech had murdered seventy of his brothers to make himself king. At Thebez he stood at the door of one last tower with fire in his hand. Then a woman no one names ended him with a stone she used for grinding grain. So who holds the real power in this story? And how does God settle accounts with a man like this?
The stone falls at the moment Abimelech looks unstoppable.
But Abimelech was a forceful man. It looked as if his cruel rule would be fastened even more firmly on Israel's shoulders. Then, all at once, deliverance came. Abimelech had taken Thebez, and the survivors there fled in desperation to a tower. He was about to set the tower on fire and destroy them. Just then a blow struck him down. And how? A woman threw down from the tower a piece of a millstone.
The way he died was not random. It fits a pattern that runs right through Scripture.
the punishment is often of the same kind as the sin that caused it. Scripture gives many examples of this. Jacob deceived his father when the old man could not see. Later Leah's crafty father deceived Jacob in the dark. Jacob's sons sold their brother Joseph into Egypt, and they themselves had to come into Egypt… Abimelech killed his seventy brothers on one stone. He himself died when a piece of a millstone was thrown on his head… As we sow, so we reap.
Two judgments run through this story, not one. A curse spoken earlier by Jotham also reaches its end here.
Fire came out from Abimelech and destroyed the men of Shechem. He planned to do the same to the men of Thebez. But no fire came out from him this time. Instead a piece of a broken millstone came down from a woman of Thebez and dealt him a death blow… The men of Shechem had shared in the wicked murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his anger and brought on him the miserable destruction he fully deserved. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and that curse came true.
God used no army here. He used a woman and the upper stone of her hand mill — the tool she worked with every day.
A woman's hand with a piece of millstone makes an end of him. Here is weakness using a simple tool of daily work — the humble daily work of a weak woman. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech and all his power with him. A woman's hand does it.
His last words are not remorse but reputation management. He calls his armour-bearer so the record will not read as it in fact reads.
He could only call quickly to his armour-bearer to kill him with his sword. He did not ask this to escape the pain. He asked it so that people would not say that a woman killed him! (vv. 53-54). Such was the pride of this godless man. Whatever he was thinking, the Lord still used a woman to defeat him. The record gives no reason to admire Abimelech.
Some writers see the falling millstone as a picture that points beyond Thebez. Revelation uses the same image for the fall of Babylon.
It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. Here the millstone reminds us of Babylon's overthrow. In Revelation 18:21 the New Testament takes up the same symbol the Old Testament prophet used. There Babylon herself is pictured as the millstone, the hard and merciless grinder of God's wheat. In the story in Judges, the millstone is the cause of Abimelech's destruction. Yet the two thoughts are almost one: it is character that brings destruction from God.
- Sowing. Abimelech killed seventy brothers on one stone. A piece of a millstone then killed him. The punishment matched the crime: as we sow, so we reap.
- Timing. The blow fell when his grip looked tightest, with the fire already in his hand at the tower door.
- Restraint. God used his violence to punish guilty Shechem. Then God stopped him and destroyed him.
- Weakness. A weak woman and a broken household tool ended him. The power that made him king could not unmake him.
- Pride. Dying, he cared only that no one say a woman killed him. The record says it anyway, and gives him no honour.
Then he called hastily to the young man that carried his armour, and said to him, Draw thy sword, and slay me, that they say not of me, A woman killed him. And his young man thrust him through, and he died.
Abimelech grabbed power for himself, and the chapter ends with him lying under a tower at Thebez with a crushed skull. His dying concern was not his soul but his name — that no one should be able to say a woman had killed him.
The command to the young armour-bearer was not a plea for relief from pain. He was trying to edit the record of his own death.
A woman in the tower (her name is unknown) dropped a large millstone from the top onto Abimelech's head. It crushed his skull. All he could do was call quickly to his armour bearer to kill him with his sword. That was not to save him from suffering. It was so that people would not say that a woman killed him! Such was the pride of this ungodly man. Whatever his thoughts were, it was still a woman whom the Lord used to defeat him, and the record certainly inspires no admiration for Abimelech.
The stone that ended him was not a weapon. It was a tool of ordinary daily work, thrown by weak hands.
Then Abimelech goes after another man to another city. There he tries to do the same thing, to burn out those who had found shelter in the tower. Then a woman's hand with a piece of a millstone makes an end of him — weakness using a simple tool of daily work, the humble daily work of a weak woman. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech, and all his power with him. A woman's hand does it.
The same writer draws the wider lesson elsewhere in this book.
Notice here the lesson that is repeated all through this book. The way of power is the way of weakness. God will only use an instrument weak enough to give itself up into His hands.
Abimelech was winning. Victory over the tower looked certain. That is the moment God chose.
But God had decreed his destruction. He was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and the final victory looked certain. Then "a certain woman threw a piece of a millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted in the means He uses. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had failed.
Abimelech's fire consumed Shechem. At Thebez the fire failed him, and something else came down instead.
Fire came out from Abimelech and devoured the men of Shechem. But when he planned to do the same to the men of Thebez, no fire came out from him. Instead a piece of a broken millstone came down from a woman of Thebez and dealt him a death-blow. The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been willing partners in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the anger of Abimelech serve the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his anger and brought on him the miserable destruction he had fully earned. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and it came true.
Abimelech's whole standing came from his father's name.
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But when anyone uses such a thing for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. If there is anything in his history that stands out more than the rest, it is the seriousness of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap: if he sows to the flesh, from the flesh he will reap corruption. And this is just as true of the believer as of the man who carelessly or lightly bears the name of the Lord Jesus.
- Sowing. Abimelech built on his father's name for his own gain. His end was the harvest of that seed, and commentators warn that the rule holds for believers too.
- Curse. Jotham's parable was prophecy and curse together. Fire from Abimelech consumed Shechem; at Thebez God stopped the fire.
- Weakness. God chose a nameless woman and a household grinding stone. All through this book, power runs by way of weakness.
- Freedom. God had already used a woman to bring down Sisera. He is not restricted to means when every other means has failed.
- Reckoning. His last thought was his reputation, not his soul. The order to his armour-bearer changed nothing: a woman still brought him down.
And when the men of Israel saw that Abimelech was dead, they went every man to his place.
The chapter that began with a self-made king ends with an army walking home. One stone from an unnamed hand emptied the field. Why did a movement that looked unstoppable collapse the moment one man fell?
Abimelech's cause had no life apart from him. His soldiers' next move proves it.
With Abimelech dead, there was no leader and no reason for his servants to fight any longer. They all left and returned to their homes (v. 55). So, just as God had prophesied through Jotham, Abimelech destroyed the Shechemites, and a Shechemite woman killed him. Whether Abimelech or the men of Shechem, they all reaped what they had sown. Their gross evil recoiled on their own heads (vv. 56-57).
Commentators trace the collapse back to how the throne began.
Abimelech's rule lasted only three years. It was truly a matter of man ruling man to his hurt. God could not bless a kingdom set up in such a way. Both Abimelech and the men of Shechem had left Him out of their calculations. Both came to a tragic end. Today men do likewise. They too will find that God will not be mocked.
Abimelech did not build his own standing. He borrowed it from his father. The warning here reaches anyone who carries a good name.
In him we have a man who took advantage of the reputation for the power of God that had worked through his father. But where anything of the sort is used for self, and not for God, bitter disappointment must be the result. And if there is anything more marked than another in his history, it is the solemnity of divine retribution. This is always true in the ways of God. What a man sows he must reap: if he sows to the flesh, of the flesh he reaps corruption.
No army stopped Abimelech. A household tool did.
Then Abimelech goes after another man to another city. There he is trying to do the same thing, to burn out those who had found shelter in the tower. While he does it, a woman's hand with a piece of millstone makes an end of him — weakness using a simple instrument of daily, humble toil. She takes the millstone and throws it out, crushing Abimelech, and all his power with him. It is done by the hand of a woman.
The men who made Abimelech king later turned on him. Their hostility is not what ended him.
It is not the power that makes Abimelech that can unmake him. He prevails against Shechem, only to perish by a woman's hand at Thebez. Here the millstone reminds us of Babylon's overthrow. In Revelation 18:21 the New Testament takes up the symbol the Old Testament prophet used. There Babylon herself is pictured by the millstone, as the hard and merciless grinder of God's wheat. In the story in Judges, the millstone causes Abimelech's destruction. Yet these two things are almost one: it is character that brings destruction from God.
Jotham had told a story about trees looking for a king. The olive, fig and vine all refused. Only the bramble, a thorn bush, accepted. Commentators read the rest of the chapter as the harvest of that choice.
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable. This is even more so when it is a question of God's things.
The alternative is not a better man. It is reliance on the Lord Himself.
The Lord alone is our sufficiency. His love and grace and power can never fail. He is the true Vine, the Olive and the Fig Tree of whom Jotham spoke, in contrast to the useless bramble. Yes, all His people's need is found in Him.
- Sown. Abimelech took the reputation his father earned under God and used it for himself; what a man sows he must reap.
- Struck. No army unmade him. A woman's hand and a fragment of a millstone did — it is character that brings destruction from God.
- Scattered. A rule with no root in God had nothing to hold it once its one man fell. The soldiers went home.
- Settled. Both the usurper and the men who crowned him reaped their own evil; God will not be mocked.
- Sheltered. Shechem chose the bramble, and it destroyed them; the Lord alone — the true Vine, Olive and Fig Tree — never fails those who lean on Him.
And God rendered back the wickedness of Abimelech, which he did to his father in slaying his seventy brethren.
Judges 9 reads like pure human scheming: a rigged kingship, a civil war, a falling millstone. Then the chapter closes by naming God as the one who paid Abimelech back for killing his seventy brothers.
The chapter reads like a chain of human schemes, but the closing verses supply the missing name.
The last two verses of the chapter point out that God's hand in government was behind the whole thing. The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons. God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made Abimelech's anger serve the justice of divine retribution. But when Abimelech tried to go further, God held back the rest of his anger. God then brought on him the miserable destruction he so fully deserved. Jotham's parable held not only a prophecy but a curse, and it was fulfilled.
The verse counts the murder of the brothers as evil done to their father. And the murder was planned, not sudden.
His relatives gave Abimelech a little money — seventy shekels of silver. With it he hired worthless and reckless men to carry out his evil plans. Then, to stop any chance of opposition, he went to Ophrah and killed the other sons of Gideon. Only the youngest, Jotham, escaped by hiding. This awful crime of mass murder of his own brothers meant nothing to him. None of them had shown any desire to reign over Israel, but he wanted to make sure that none of them would.
Abimelech was winning at Thebez when his life ended. One writer draws out what God's choice of instrument shows.
But God had decreed his destruction. Abimelech was fighting against the tower of Thebez, and final victory looked certain. Then "a certain woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not restricted to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had proved useless.
His last act was to protect his reputation, and even that failed.
All he could do was call quickly to his armor bearer to kill him with his sword. He did not ask this to escape suffering. He asked it so that people would not say a woman killed him! Such was the pride of this ungodly man. Whatever his thoughts were, it was still a woman whom the Lord used to defeat him.
God "returned" Abimelech's evil to him. One writer places that repayment beside forgiveness, and shows they are not the same thing.
"Whatever one sows, that will he also reap." The sin of sowing weeds may be forgiven, but the reaping must match the sowing. The first is grace, the second is government. Each acts in its own sphere, and neither interferes with the other.
Some readers flinch at this side of God. One writer answers them.
It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. It was God who brought down on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask, in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not. He is completely righteous. Modern teaching has produced a weak, watered-down religion. It flinches at the bare idea of God using His holy government to carry out justice. He carries it out all the same.
Abimelech is not the last ruler to grab power and fall. One writer sees his end as a preview of a larger one.
So it will be with the wilful king of the future, the blasphemous persecutor of God's saints. The Lord Jesus "will kill him with the breath of His mouth and bring him to nothing by the appearance of His coming."
- Returned, not random. The closing verses explain the whole chapter. God's hand in government was behind it all.
- Returned to the guilty. Abimelech's murder of his brothers was cold and calculated. The verse says God paid back that exact crime.
- Returned by any means. A woman's millstone did what nothing else had done. God is not restricted to means.
- Returned, though forgiven. Grace can forgive the sin, yet the reaping still matches the sowing. Grace and government each act in their own sphere.
- Returned again one day. What fell on Abimelech points ahead. The wilful king still to come will meet the same God, and the Lord Jesus will destroy him.
And all the evil of the men of Shechem did God render back upon their heads; and upon them came the curse of Jotham the son of Jerubbaal.
Judges 9 ends with a verdict, not a battle report. The final verse looks past the burning towers and the broken skull and names God as the one who was acting. Abimelech's crime and Shechem's share in it both came back on the men who did them.
The chapter is full of human scheming. One writer names the real actor behind it, then answers the objection that follows.
It was God who sent the evil spirit between Abimelech and the men of Shechem. It was God who repaid the wickedness of Abimelech. God repaid on the heads of the men of Shechem all their evil. And we may ask in the words of Scripture, "Is God unrighteous to inflict wrath?" Indeed He is not: He is very righteous. The modern teaching of these later days has produced a weak and soft religion. It flinches at the bare idea of God using His holy government to carry out justice. He carries it out all the same; and before long we may see further striking expressions of it.
A man can serve God's purpose and still answer for his own crime. The same writer shows where God drew the line.
The men of Shechem had been wicked accomplices in the murder of Gideon's sons, and God used Abimelech to punish them as they deserved. So God made the wrath of Abimelech serve the justice of divine repayment. But when he tried to go further, God held back the rest of his wrath and brought on him the miserable destruction he so richly deserved. Jotham's parable contained not only a prophecy but a curse, and it came true.
Jotham had no army and no throne. One writer shows where his words came from, and how fast they landed.
Of course it is clear this was not honest dealing, but grossly wicked. So Jotham adds, "But if not, let fire come out from Abimelech and devour the leaders of Shechem and Beth-millo; and let fire come out from the leaders of Shechem and from Beth-millo and devour Abimelech" (v. 20). This was a prophecy God had put into the mouth of Jotham, and it was fulfilled only three years later.
The verse names two guilty parties, and neither one escapes. The judgment fits what each had done.
As God had foretold through Jotham, Abimelech destroyed the Shechemites, and a Shechemite woman killed him. Whether Abimelech or the men of Shechem, they all reaped what they had sown. Their gross evil came back on their own heads (vv. 56-57).
This repayment is not only an Old Testament idea. One writer grounds it in the New Testament, then points to the small thing God used at the moment Abimelech looked sure to win.
Righteous retribution follows in due course: "God considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you," and "if anyone is to be slain with the sword, with the sword must he be slain" (2 Thessalonians 1:6; Revelation 13:10). God had decreed his destruction. When he was fighting against the tower of Thebez, with final victory all but certain, "a certain woman threw an upper millstone on Abimelech's head and crushed his skull." God is not limited to means. He who sold Sisera into the hands of a woman could use a similar instrument here, when everything else had proved useless.
The principle in this verse is not tied to one hillside town. The same writer sees the same self-exalting spirit in a ruler still to come.
Now the Lord has declared that "Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted" — Abimelech proved the truth of it, and so will the godless counterpart of the future.
Abimelech's pride and Shechem's folly ended in the same ruin. One writer draws out the lesson for readers now.
The ninth chapter of Judges records for us the bitter harvest of his pride and their folly. It teaches us to beware of trusting in man — the bramble of Jotham's parable, Judges 9 — and especially so when it is a question of God's things.
- Sown. Shechem helped murder Gideon's sons, then crowned the murderer. This verse is the crop they planted.
- Spoken. God put the prophecy in Jotham's mouth, and it came true just three years later.
- Sent. The evil spirit, the fire, the millstone: the text credits all of it to God, not to politics or bad luck.
- Stopped. God used Abimelech to punish Shechem, then restrained the rest of his wrath and destroyed him.
- Settled. Both parties got back what they gave. God brings down the man who lifts himself up — then, and in the future.