Judges 6:1–8:35

Judges 6:1 · Darby

And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of Jehovah; and Jehovah delivered them into the hand of Midian seven years.

Judges 6 begins the story of Gideon. It opens with the cause of everything that follows: Israel's evil, and seven years under Midian. Two questions matter here. Whose hand was really the strongest? And how did the people who conquered the land end up hiding in it?

The enemy's power comes from Israel's sin

The verse names the cause before it names the oppressor.

First of all, we are reminded that the unfaithfulness of God's people is what puts power into any enemy's hand. No might of Midian could have prevailed if the Lord had not permitted it. And He would not have permitted it if Israel's condition had not made it necessary. Those who will not learn in communion with God, must do so in the hands of the enemy. "Your evil will chastise you, and your apostasy will reprove you. Know and see that it is evil and bitter for you to forsake the LORD your God." (Jer. 2:19.)

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Midian was only a rod in God's hand

The raiders had no idea that God was using them. One writer sets them beside Assyria, which God called the rod of His anger.

The Midianites did not know that the LORD had delivered Israel into their hands. In reality they were only the rod with which it pleased Him to punish His people. As with the Assyrian (Isa. 10): "Ah, Assyria, the rod of my anger; the staff in their hands is my fury!" When He has finished with His rod, He can break it or burn it. "Shall the axe boast over him who hews with it, or the saw magnify itself against him who wields it?" Satan himself is very often the rod used by God for the discipline of His children.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The shame of a conquering people in caves

Set this chapter next to Israel's entrance into the land and the reversal is stark.

What a humiliating picture! What a reverse for the Israel of God! What a contrast to the conquering army that had crossed the Jordan and walked across the ruins of Jericho! How sad, how humbling, to think of Israel hiding in the dens and caves of the mountains, in terror of the Midianites!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same writer names the evil and what it cost Israel.

Israel's power and glory consisted simply in having the presence of God with them. Without that, they were as water spilled on the ground… But they could not enjoy God's presence while they allowed evil among them. So when Israel forgot their Lord and wandered away from Him into the forbidden paths of idolatry, He had to bring them to their senses by stretching out His governmental rod.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Who Midian was

This oppressor was not a stranger. He was family, and God had already told Israel to fight him.

Midian was a near relative of Israel. He descended from Abraham through Keturah, his second wife, and again and again the Midianites cross paths with the chosen people. In the wilderness the LORD spoke to Moses — who had married Zipporah, daughter of the priest of Midian — and said, "Harass the Midianites and strike them down, for they have harassed you with their wiles." (Num. 25:16-18; Num. 31:1-12.) But now they are in the land itself, though they had never followed the ark across the Jordan… How solemn the warning!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Midian means "strife"

Commentators read the name as a picture of what the world does once it is let in among God's people.

Midian stands for the world, as its history has shown it. The name matches this: it means "strife." "The corruption that is in the world" is "because of sinful desire" (2 Peter 1:4). And "What causes quarrels and what causes fights among you? Is it not this, that your passions are at war within you?" (James 4:1.)… These Midianites were Arab raiders. They wandered and plundered, devouring like locusts what they had no will to produce, as the story here shows. This is what the world is when the professing church lets it in: it has no shared interest with the church, but the reverse, and the effect is simply desolation.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The result is starvation

Each oppression in this book has its own character. Under Midian, Israel loses its food.

Under Jabin, Israel had no weapons (Judges 5:8). Under the yoke of Midian he was starving. This is what our unfaithfulness costs us, and we always suffer it when we seek our portion with the world. It drags us down and takes away our weapons. Our strength leaves us, and we lose every means of resisting… We notice it by the barrenness that invades the soul when, in our folly, we leave the rich food of the house of God for harvests that are only a mirage of the desert.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — Israel's evil comes first in the verse, Midian second. No enemy holds power over God's people except what their own unfaithfulness hands him.

- Rod — Midian is a tool, not a master. God lifts the rod, and when He has finished with it He can break it.

- Kin — The oppressor descended from Abraham, and God had already marked him out as a danger. The trouble came from a relative, not a stranger.

- Strife — The name means strife. That is what the world brings once God's people let it in: raiding, not building, and desolation as the result.

- Famine — Seven years of Midian left Israel starving in caves. That is the opposite of the army that walked over the ruins of Jericho. Their one strength was God's presence, and that presence will not stay where evil is allowed.

Judges 6:2 · Darby

And the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel. Because of the Midianites the children of Israel made for themselves the dens that are in the mountains, and the caves, and the strongholds.

Israel lives in the land God gave them, yet they are the ones hiding underground. The verse raises two questions: how could an enemy bring God's people this low, and what did they lose by hiding?

Why the enemy prevailed

Israel's safety had never rested on their own numbers.

Israel's power and glory consisted simply in having the presence of God with them. Without that, they were like water spilled on the ground, like the autumn leaf before the wind. But they could not enjoy God's presence while they allowed evil among them. So when Israel forgot their Lord and wandered into the forbidden paths of idolatry, He had to bring them back to their senses. He stretched out His governmental rod and made them feel the crushing power of one or another of the nations around them.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The strength of Midian was never the real issue:

This was not because the Midianites were more powerful than the children of Israel. When God was among them and fighting for them, the size of the enemy did not matter. The battle was already decided... The reason for their condition was their own unfaithfulness. They disobeyed God's plain, clear word: have nothing to do with idolatry, and give Him the place in your affections.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

A humiliating reversal

Set the verse beside what this nation once was.

What a humiliating picture! What a contrast to the conquering army that had crossed the Jordan and walked across the ruins of Jericho! How sad to think of Israel crouching and hiding in the dens and caves of the mountains, in terror of the pagan Midianites!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer looks past Israel's shame to what the discipline cost God Himself:

They had never sunk so low. To live like wanderers and fugitives in the land of God, in their own land, was a burning disgrace to Israel... Gideon felt this, and he felt it all the more because he knew their slavery under Midian was the Lord's doing. Israel's moral state left Him no choice but to reduce His people to such a shameful condition. What must God have felt, to deal so with those He loved!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Hidden people, hidden light

God put Israel in that land for a reason. People hiding in holes cannot serve it.

In short, they hid themselves in the earth. God had set them in that land to be a witness for Himself. If they had walked in His ways, their light would have kept shining, and other nations would have learnt how good it was to have Israel's God. But they were no witness for God while they hid in the dens and caves of the earth. It is the same today. God's people whose souls are under the power of earthly things shine no light for Him. Their light is hidden instead of set on the lampstand for all to see.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Who Midian stands for

Commentators read Midian's name as "strife" in two directions. Some see worldliness starting a civil war inside a believer:

Midian means "strife," a fitting name for that spirit of the world which brings the strife of desires into the soul... Look at that happy young Christian: the things of God are his delight, and fellowship with the people of God his only pleasure. But he wanders in heart, and the world finds an entrance. It will not take some blatantly immoral form. He indulges some "harmless pleasure" or forms some "agreeable companionship". Mark the results. Strife with divine things follows.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Others read it of quarrelling among God's people, which leaves them with nothing to feed on:

The food set before the saints is strife and sorrow and backbiting and misrepresentation and cruelties of different kinds. No one can grow spiritually on this food. This was the condition Israel was in. There was no family life, the business life of the nation broke down, and food supply ran very low. In that condition the people were very distressed. It is a very good thing when people do get distressed and cry aloud to God.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

The point of the rod

The oppression itself taught a lesson about who is fit to rule.

Their enemies ruled over them for a complete period, because they had rebelled against the rule of God. So God teaches them, in the land of blessing and privilege, the contrast between His rule and the rule of man. We are always ruled by someone or something. If not by God, then by that power which is hostile to God and His people. We are often brought under that power so that we may learn how much better God's rule is. Under Him our passions are controlled; under the other our very nature is worn out and harassed. This is a discipline that all God's people can come under.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause: Midian did not overpower Israel. Israel's own unfaithfulness handed them over, because their whole strength was God's presence.

- Cost: the nation that walked over the ruins of Jericho now crouched in caves, like fugitives in their own land. God felt that shame too.

- Concealment: hidden people make poor witnesses. A light in a cave tells the nations nothing about Israel's God.

- Character: Midian means "strife." Some read it as worldliness at war inside one soul, others as quarrelling that starves a whole company.

- Cure: God lets an enemy rule so His people learn how much better His rule is. The distress does its work when it makes them cry out to Him.

Judges 6:3 · Darby

And it came to pass when Israel sowed, that Midian came up, and Amalek, and the children of the east, and came up against them.

This verse shows a routine, not a single raid: Israel plants, and three enemy peoples come up together. Why did a nation living in its own land end up farming for its enemies?

Timed to the harvest

The verse ties the raids to the farming year: Midian let Israel sow, then came for what the sowing produced. The cause, though, lay inside Israel.

Those were very dark days in Israel. The land was suffering badly because of the evil of God's people. They sowed their grain, but reaped no harvest. The Midianites came up at harvest time with their cattle and tents, as many as grasshoppers, and destroyed the produce of the land.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Who the raiders were

Midian and Amalek appear often in Israel's story. "The people of the East" is vaguer, and one Bible dictionary traces the name back to Genesis.

One of the ancient peoples who held the land promised to Abraham, Genesis 15:19. Probably the same as bene-Kedem, "children of the east." Judges 6:3.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Not a question of strength

So who really beat Israel? One writer points away from Midian's strength.

"And the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel." Nothing could have prevailed against them, had they been faithful to the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the names suggest

Commentators differ on what Midian pictures. Several start from the meaning of the name, and hear a warning about quarrelling among God's people.

The name Midian means "strife" or "contention"… How often we have seen normal conditions in assembly life disrupted among the people of God because of strife and contention. People seek their own way. Strong-willed people make demands about things that ought never to be considered among the people of God… There is very little worship of the Father and the Son. There is very little testimony to the Lord or to the unconverted. And there is precious little food supply.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Midian does not come alone. One writer treats the partners as a pattern.

When crops had been sown, the Midianites would come. Amalekites and others from the east came with them, destroying the produce of the earth (vv. 3-4). Amalek speaks of the lusts of the flesh, which we may always expect to accompany an attitude of strife (Midian). The result of such an attack will also always be to destroy all spiritual growth and prosperity.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Midian as the world's pull

Others read the raid as a picture of ordinary earthly things taking over a believer's life. On this reading the invaders are not gross wickedness at all.

Now the things of earth are not necessarily bad and grossly sinful. They are things which may be right and proper when kept in their right place, and they may include God's temporal mercies to us. But if they become our object in life they crowd out the things of Christ and heaven. As a result the sunshine leaves the life, the song leaves the lips, and soul prosperity is at an end.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Israel's land was rich, which made the loss bitter. One writer sees the same hunger in Christians who find nothing in their Bibles.

Midian devours or destroys all the fruits of the earth. Canaan was famous, as parts of it still are today, for its wonderful fertility. God could call it "the glory of all lands," and He promised them they should eat their bread without scarcity. How many of the Lord's people have to complain of their leanness. They find so little food, the Bible is a closed book to them, their souls are suffering a famine. The world has devoured the food. You cannot enjoy the world and enjoy Christ. It is impossible.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The promised reversal

Sowing for others to reap is the dark background of a later promise. One writer sets this verse beside days of quiet peace for the same people.

How often had their fathers sown for others to reap! How often had the enemy invaded the land and carried off the produce of the soil! (Judges 6:3, 11.) Their affairs will prosper. God's blessing will be known in their families… "The Lord will bless you out of Zion. May you see the good of Jerusalem all the days of your life. May you see your children's children, and peace upon Israel."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Harvest stolen — Israel sowed, and Midian came at harvest. The work fed the enemy, not the workers.

- Harvest lost — the raiders were not too strong. Nothing could have beaten Israel while they stayed faithful to the Lord.

- Harvest attacked twice — Midian never came alone. Commentators read Amalek as the lusts of the flesh, the companion strife always brings.

- Harvest crowded out — others read the invaders as earthly things. They are right in their place, but ruinous once they become life's object.

- Harvest restored — God promises the same nation days when its own work feeds it, with blessing out of Zion.

Judges 6:4 · Darby

And they encamped against them, and destroyed the produce of the land, until thou come to Gazah, and they left no sustenance in Israel, neither sheep, nor ox, nor ass.

Raiders swept in each year and stripped Israel's fields bare, leaving nothing to eat and nothing to farm with. Two questions press: how did God's people starve in the land God gave them, and what famine does this picture?

The lost harvest had a cause

The stripping of the land was not bad luck. Commenting on the whole passage, one writer fixes the blame before describing the damage.

"And the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel." Nothing could have prevailed against them, had they been faithful to the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

An enemy with no right to be there

Midian was not a stranger. The nation descended from Abraham through his second wife Keturah, which makes their presence in Canaan all the more painful.

But now they are in the land itself, though they had never followed the ark across the Jordan; "and Israel was greatly impoverished because of the Midianites." How solemn the warning!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Raiders who destroy what they never grew

The picture in the verse is of plunderers, not settlers. They had no interest in building anything up.

These Midianites — some think "Midian" is really connected with the modern word "Bedouin" — were Arab raiders, wandering pillagers, devouring like locusts what they had no will to produce, as the story here shows. This is what the world is when it is let into the professing church: it has no shared interest with it, but the opposite; the effect is simply desolation.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

"Till you come to Gaza"

The verse marks how far the ruin reached. That place name may carry more weight than a map reference.

Notice, too, the connection with the Philistines, whose name we have seen means "wanderers"… "As far as Gaza" is no mere geographical limit. "In those days, as in later times, Gaza was the great market for stolen goods, brought there by the Bedouins from their raids." It would be natural for Philistines to join Israel's enemies.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The name behind the ruin

One writer draws a straight line from the meaning of the name Midian to an empty table.

The name Midian means 'strife' or 'contention'… How often we have seen strife and contention disrupt normal life among God's people, with people seeking their own way… There is very little worship of the Father and the Son, very little testimony to the Lord or to the unconverted, and precious little food supply. What the saints are asked to feed on is strife and sorrow and backbiting and misrepresentation and cruelties of different kinds. No spiritual growth is possible on this food.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

"No sustenance" — the state of a starved soul

One writer turns "no sustenance" on the believer who goes looking for life in the world.

Under the yoke of Midian, Israel went hungry — the result of our unfaithfulness, which we always suffer from when we seek our portion with the world. It drags us down and takes away our weapons. Our strength leaves us, and we lose every means of standing firm. Even the sources of life are missing, for the world never feeds anyone. We see it in the barrenness that invades the soul. In our folly we leave the richness of the house of God for harvests that are only a mirage of the desert. This was Israel's experience; Midian "left no sustenance" for him (v. 4).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Canaan was rich land, which makes this emptiness sharper. Another writer finds the same emptiness in Christians who cannot explain their own leanness.

Canaan was known for its wonderful fertility, as parts of it still are today. God could call it "the most glorious of all lands," and He promised them they would eat their bread without scarcity. How many of the Lord's people have to complain of their leanness! They find so little food, the Bible is a closed book to them, their souls are suffering a famine. The world has devoured the food. You cannot enjoy the world and enjoy Christ. It is impossible.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the famine was for

Israel's hunger was not the end of the story. The same writer traces what their cry produced.

The people of Israel cried out for help to the LORD… First, the Lord sent a prophet to bring their sin home to their conscience, and then He sent an angel to raise up a deliverer. He finds Gideon threshing wheat by the winepress to hide it from the Midianites.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — The harvest was not stolen by an unstoppable force. Faithfulness would have kept Midian out; unfaithfulness let the raiders in.

- Character — Midian devoured what it never planted. That is what the world does wherever the church lets it in: it gives nothing and leaves desolation.

- Cost — Strife empties the table. Where contention rules among God's people, worship, witness and food all dry up.

- Condition — "No sustenance" is the believer's own symptom: a closed Bible, a lean soul, a lost appetite. You cannot feed on the world and on Christ at once.

- Cure — The famine drove Israel to cry out, and God answered: a prophet for the conscience, then a deliverer. Emptiness is meant to end in that cry.

Judges 6:5 · Darby

For they came up with their cattle and their tents, and they came as locusts for multitude; both they and their camels were without number; and they entered into the land to destroy it.

Judges 6:5 pictures an invasion as a locust swarm. Who were these raiders, why could God's own nation not stop them, and what does their stripping of the land still picture?

Raiders Who Were Relatives

These invaders were not strangers. They came from the same family line as Israel.

Midian was a close relative of Israel, descended from Abraham through Keturah, his second wife. Again and again they come into contact with the chosen people. In the wilderness the Lord spoke to Moses. Moses had married Zipporah, daughter of the priest of Midian. The Lord said, "Harass the Midianites and strike them down, for they have harassed you with their wiles." (Num. 25:16-18; Num. 31:1-12.) But now they are in the land itself, though they had never followed the ark across the Jordan. "And Israel was brought very low because of Midian." How solemn the warning!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Even the name of these raiders carries a warning for God's people.

The name Midian means "strife" or "contention." How often we have seen normal conditions among God's people disrupted by strife and contention. People seek their own way. Strong-willed people make demands about things that ought never to be considered among God's people. There are personal or family animosities, parties forming, and strife among the saints of God. There is very little worship of the Father and the Son, very little testimony to the Lord or to the unconverted, and certainly precious little food supply.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Why Such Numbers Could Win

So why could Israel not hold them off? The problem was not the size of the swarm.

"And the hand of Midian overpowered Israel." Nothing could have prevailed against them, had they been faithful to the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

They Came to Stay, Not Just to Raid

Verse 5 mentions tents and livestock — the equipment of settlers, not of a passing raid. The reach of the occupation is measured by the text itself.

Scripture describes the oppression in great detail. This helps us see clearly who these Midianites are spiritually. For fear of them the children of Israel are driven to dig dens and caves for shelter. They settled down on the land. With them came the Amalekites and a mixed crowd of eastern tribes. Like a plague of locusts, they destroyed all food and provision. Unlike the Moabites, they did not settle on the borders of the land at Jericho. They swept like a destructive plague over the whole territory, "as far as Gaza," the stronghold of the Philistines.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Locust Comparison

Locusts strip a field they never sowed. One writer carries that picture over into the church.

These Midianites were Arab raiders and wandering plunderers. Some think the name "Midian" is really connected with the modern word "Bedouin." Like locusts, they devoured what they had no will to produce, as the story here shows. This is what the world is when it is let into the professing church. It has no shared interest there, but the opposite. The effect is simply desolation.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Numberless and Never Still

These raiders never stayed still. That restless energy is the warning.

There is an energy in these hordes that marks an enemy constantly on the move. He is always looking for new points of attack. We hardly need reminding how active Satan is to bring people under the power of the world. Before we know it, some small opening has made a way, and the enemy has come in like a flood. Let us not think of the spirit of worldliness as something slow-moving. It is cunning and active, and its name is legion.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the Swarm Costs

The same stripping still happens quietly. One writer names three losses that follow.

Oh, it is pitiful! This is the sad case of thousands of once-flourishing Christians. They have been overcome not by gross sinfulness, nor even by worldliness, but by the "things of earth"! "The family, the business, the things of this life must be attended to," they say. So they neglect the things of Christ, which are their true and proper portion as God's people. Note carefully the threefold result: (1) No fruit for God. (2) No light for others. (3) No provision for themselves.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Kin. Midian came from Abraham through Keturah. The enemy was born inside the family — close enough to know Israel, hostile enough to strip it.

- Cause. Numbers did not defeat Israel; unfaithfulness did. Nothing could have prevailed against them had they stayed faithful to the Lord.

- Settlement. The tents and livestock show an occupation, not a raid. The swarm settled down and swept the land as far as Gaza.

- Appetite. Like locusts, they devoured what they had no will to produce. That is the world let into the church: it gives nothing and leaves desolation.

- Cost. The harvest is stripped before it feeds anyone. The same loss today: no fruit for God, no light for others, no provision for yourself.

Judges 6:6 · Darby

And Israel was greatly impoverished because of Midian. And the children of Israel cried to Jehovah.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 6:7 · Darby

And it came to pass when the children of Israel cried to Jehovah because of Midian,

Midian's raids had stripped Israel bare, and at last the people cried to God. What came back was not a rescuer but a preacher, and that delay carries the lesson.

Poverty felt before help arrives

The cry mattered because Israel at last admitted what it had become. One writer turns the same lesson on the church:

The sin of the church has brought it into desolation. Yet little real cry has gone up to the Lord; and why? We are not aware of how far we have departed from our original standing. We have gained so much of the world's dignity, influence and riches! These things, though they do not hide us from God or from Satan, are hiding our real poverty from ourselves. If we only knew our destitution, if we only cried to the Lord, He would deliver and raise up, "when He sees that their power is gone and there is none remaining, bond or free." Whether for Israel, for one person, or for the church, the lesson to be learned is the same: its own poverty and destitution. No matter how poor we are, if we are aware of our poverty; for there is all fullness in Christ.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A cry wrung out by pain

Yet the cry was not yet repentance. It was the groan of people who wanted their circumstances changed:

When Israel finally cried out to the LORD (v. 7), they cried simply because of their misery. So the Lord did not relieve them at once. He sent a prophet to press on Israel that their own guilt was responsible for these troubles.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two messengers, in order

God sends two messengers to Israel, and the order matters.

Notice the twofold process of the Lord. He sends first a prophet, then an angel. The prophet brings their sin home to their conscience. The angel raises up a deliverer. He loves to rescue His people from the wretched consequences of their failure, but He will have the evil owned first.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God does not rush

The delay is not coldness. It sets a rule for how we handle others in trouble:

The people suffer bitter oppression, and they cry to God. But instead of sending relief at once, He deepens in their souls the sense of the evil of their course. Our first thought is to escape the consequences of our folly and disobedience. God wants us to judge fully what led us into it. His patience and His pity combine in divine proportions, so that we may get the profit of the lesson. Let us not rush to pull His people out of an awkward position. Let us first see that they have been to the bottom of the matter with God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An unnamed man carrying a word

Who was this prophet? The commentators say the question misses the point:

God answered their cry by working a fresh revival, in which He sought to probe the conscience of this poor people more deeply than in the past. "The LORD sent a prophet to the people of Israel." His name is not given, and it does not matter. This man simply carried the word of God, to bring the people into His presence. God has a means by which to bless us: His word, which meets every requirement and ought to be quite enough for us.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Where the fault lies

The message ends by settling one question: whose fault was this?

God had been faithful to Israel, but Israel had not been faithful to God. This was the point of the prophet's testimony. He always proves His own conduct right: "If we are faithless, He remains faithful—for He cannot deny Himself." If we walked as He wants us to walk, nothing could prevail against us — not the world, not the flesh, not the devil. Whenever we find ourselves under the power of our enemies, we must be sure to charge the fault on ourselves, and not on God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Left in the silence

The prophet delivers no plan of escape. He simply goes.

Not a word about how they might be delivered; He did not yet open the way for their return to Him. The prophet disappeared, leaving them under the weight of their responsibility in the presence of grace. God had carried them in His arms and on His heart; He had fought for them. "Have I failed you in any way?" He asks. "But what have you done?" This silence would touch their conscience far more than any reproach. They were impressed, if not convicted. But the word of grace did not yet give the unfaithful people what they needed, and Israel remained powerless before the enemy.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Cry — Recovery starts when God's people feel their own poverty. Until then the cry is only about the pain.

- Delay — The cry does not bring instant relief. We want out of the consequences; God wants us to judge the cause.

- Word — His answer is an unnamed man carrying His word, because the word itself is the means by which He blesses.

- Verdict — God had been faithful; Israel had not. When enemies get the upper hand, the fault is ours, never His.

- Silence — The prophet leaves with no remedy. That silence works on the conscience harder than any rebuke. Then God raises up the deliverer.

Judges 6:8 · Darby

that Jehovah sent a prophet to the children of Israel, who said to them, Thus saith Jehovah the God of Israel I brought you up from Egypt, and brought you forth out of the house of bondage;

Israel cried out to the Lord in their misery, and God answered — but not first with a rescuer. He sent an unnamed prophet. The message begins not with Israel's trouble, but with what God had done for them long before.

A word before a deliverer

The cry that went up was the cry of people in pain, not yet people in repentance. One writer notes how God answered.

When Israel at last cried out to the Lord (v. 7), they cried only because of their misery. So the Lord did not relieve them at once. He sent a prophet to press home to Israel that their own guilt was to blame for these troubles.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God sends a second messenger after the prophet, and the order matters.

Notice the Lord's twofold way of working. He sends first a prophet, then an angel. The prophet brings their sin home to their conscience; the angel raises up a deliverer. He loves to rescue His people from the miserable results of their failure, but He will have the evil owned first.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "a prophet" means here

The man has no name and predicts nothing. That is no gap in the story. The word covers more than prediction.

So a prophet does not only mean someone who can predict future events. The messenger of God who rebuked Israel in the days of Gideon (Judges 6:8) was a prophet.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Why the message starts in Egypt

The prophet's first words point back to the rescue out of slavery. That backward look is the point: the God who acted then has not changed.

They could not have been poorer than they were. But when they felt that poverty and cried to the Lord in their distress, He met them — and He met them as the God of deliverances. He carried their thoughts back to what He had done for them in the past. He had brought them out of their captivity by a great deliverance... and had planted them in a rich inheritance, driving out all their enemies before them. He wanted them to know that He was the same God He had always been. They had changed, but He remained the everlasting God, whose strength cannot fade or fail.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Rescue as the reason to obey

The words "house of slavery" are more than background. One writer says that being bought out of slavery is the strongest motive God gives for obedience.

The fact is that redemption, even when it is only a picture of the greater redemption to come, is a stronger motive to obedience than creation itself... If the aim of all this part of Deuteronomy is to press obedience, then nothing keeps obedience alive like redemption. And if that was true when the deliverance was only an outward one, how much more when it is eternal?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where to lay the blame

The prophet's message does more than recall the past. It uncovers the cause of Israel's present trouble.

He first shows them their sin, as He did when they could not take the city of Ai. That is where the secret of their poverty comes to light. "You are crying to me now," He says in effect, "because you feel how poor you are. But the real cause of your poverty is this — you have sinned against me." They had no one to blame but themselves.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer turns the same point on us.

God had been faithful to Israel, but Israel had not been faithful to God. This was the point of the prophet's testimony... Whenever we find ourselves under the power of our enemies, we must be careful to lay the blame on ourselves, and not on God.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Cry — Israel cried out of misery, not repentance. So God did not relieve them at once. He sent a messenger to press their guilt home first.

- Word — God's first answer is a prophet, His second a deliverer. He rescues His people from the results of their failure, but He will have the evil owned first.

- Reminder — the message opens with Egypt because God is still the God of deliverances. Israel had changed; He had not.

- Claim — the house of slavery is the ground of God's claim. Nothing keeps obedience alive like the memory of being redeemed.

- Verdict — Israel's own sin, not any change in God, caused their poverty. When we find ourselves under the power of our enemies, the fault is ours.

Judges 6:9 · Darby

and I delivered you out of the hand of the Egyptians, and out of the hand of all that oppressed you, and drove them out from before you, and gave you their land,

Midian had crushed Israel, and at last the people cried to the Lord. God's first answer was not a deliverer but an unnamed prophet. He pointed them back to the rescue God had already given them.

A Prophet Before a Deliverer

The chapter has two messengers, and the order matters.

Mark the twofold process of the Lord. He sends first a prophet, then an angel; the one to bring their sin home to their conscience, the other to raise up a deliverer. He loves to rescue His people from the wretched consequences of their failure, but He will have the evil owned first.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The delay between the cry and the rescue is not coldness. It carries a lesson for anyone trying to help others out of trouble.

What holy wisdom we have here. The people are bitterly oppressed, and they cry to God, but instead of sending relief at once, He deepens in their souls the sense of the evil of their course. Our first thought is to get out of the consequences of our folly and disobedience: God's desire is that we should thoroughly judge what led us into it. His patience and His pity combine in divine proportions, so that we may get the profit of the lesson. Let us not be too eager to deliver His people from an awkward position, but rather to see that they have been to the bottom of the matter with God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Real Cause of the Poverty

Israel assumed the problem was Midian. The prophet's list of past rescues removes that excuse.

He first of all shows them their sin, as He did when they could not take Ai. There the secret of their impoverishment is found out. He in effect says: "You are crying to Me now because you feel your impoverishment. But the real cause of your impoverishment is this — you have sinned against Me." They had none to blame but themselves.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer puts it the other way round: the enemy's size was never the deciding factor.

God is a faithful God and He sends a nameless prophet, and he tells the people the reason why they are in this condition. As we have said in previous lectures, this was not because the Midianites were more powerful than Israel. When Israel had God among them, and God fighting for them, it did not matter how great the enemy was. The battle was a foregone conclusion. God was with His people helping them.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

God Clears His Own Name

The prophet's message defends God, not Israel.

God had been faithful to Israel, but Israel had not been faithful to God. This was the point of the prophet's testimony. He always vindicates His own conduct: "if we are faithless, He remains faithful — for He cannot deny Himself." If we were walking as He would have us, neither the world, nor the flesh, nor the devil could prevail against us. Whenever we find ourselves under the power of our enemies, we must be sure to charge the fault on ourselves, and not on God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Egypt as the Pledge of Every Later Rescue

God starts where He always starts: with the rescue from Egypt.

He goes back, as He always does, to the redemption from Egypt — the pledge and the power for all other deliverances — and recalls to them what He had done. He had brought them into this land, had driven the enemy out of it, and told His people not to fear the false gods that the Amorites had served. How simple all this was. How impossible, we might say, ever to fear the powers of evil which had been overthrown. Yet they — and are they alone? — had not obeyed His voice.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Mercy Meant to Produce Confession

The reminder was meant to produce a response.

As He had done many times before, He reminded them through the prophet that He had brought Israel up from Egypt, out of the house of slavery. He brought them to their present land and drove out their enemies before them. The amazing wonder of all this had failed to impress Israel enough to make them cling firmly to the Lord... How little effect God's Word had in their hearts: they did not obey His voice. This message should certainly have brought them down in repentant confession of their guilt, and it may have been so in some measure, for it was this that God was seeking.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Cry — Misery drove Israel to call on God. The cry alone did not bring relief. God first deepened their sense of what had led them there.

- Cause — Their poverty came from their own sin, not from Midian's strength. With God among them, no enemy was too big.

- Record — God lists His own past rescues one by one. His faithfulness is plain, so the blame falls on Israel.

- Pledge — The rescue from Egypt is the guarantee of every later rescue. Fearing powers God has already beaten makes no sense.

- Confession — Mercy remembered is meant to lead to repentance. God sent the prophet before the deliverer, because He will have the evil owned first.

Judges 6:10 · Darby

and I said to you, I am Jehovah your God; fear not the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell. But ye have not hearkened to my voice.

Israel is crying out under Midian's raids, and God answers — but not yet with a rescuer. Through an unnamed prophet He names Himself as their God, recalls all He has done, and ends with the charge that explains their misery.

Grace Rehearsed Before the Charge

Most of the prophet's message is kindness. Only at the end does it turn, and even then He offers no cure.

In a way full of grace, God applied His word to the conscience of the Israelites. He told them all that He had done for them. He led them out, gave them deliverance and victory, and brought them in. Then, having spread out all His goodness before them, He adds one word: "But you have not obeyed My voice." He said nothing about how He would deliver them. He did not yet open the way for their return to Him. The prophet disappeared. He left them under the weight of their responsibility, in the presence of grace... "Have I failed you in any way," He says, "but what have you done?" This silence would touch their conscience far more than any reproach could.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The One Command They Broke

The command He recalls is specific: do not fear the gods of the people whose land you now live in. Those gods belonged to a beaten enemy.

He goes back, as He always does, to the redemption from Egypt. That rescue is the pledge and the power for every other deliverance. He reminds them of what He had done. He had brought them into this land and driven the enemy out of it. He told His people not to fear the false gods that the Amorites had served. How simple all this was. How impossible, we might say, ever to fear powers of evil that God had already overthrown. Yet they — and are they the only ones? — had not obeyed His voice.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why a Prophet Came First

The order matters. Before any deliverer appears in the story, a word arrives that shows the people what they are.

The deliverer has not yet come on the scene. First the Lord answers that cry. Through the mouth of a prophet He shows the people how they had departed from Him. The first great dealing of the Lord with the soul is to show it its failure and its abandonment of Him. The word of God pierces to the division of soul and of spirit, and discerns the thoughts and intentions of the heart. Its great work is to reveal to the soul its own condition. In the earlier age, the prophets did what the word does now.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Enemy Was Never the Real Problem

The trouble did not come from the enemy's power. It came from something inside Israel.

The reason for their condition was their own unfaithfulness. They had disobeyed God's plain and clear word: have nothing to do with idolatry, and keep Him enshrined in their affections. The last word of John's first letter is, "Little children, keep yourselves from idols." That is not a negative statement. It is a very positive one. It simply means, "I want the affections of My people for Myself; I do not want interference from any other source."

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Where the Blame Belongs

The verse sets two records side by side: God's dealings, and Israel's response. Only one of them changed.

God had been faithful to Israel, but Israel had not been faithful to God. That was the point of the prophet's testimony. He always vindicates His own conduct. "If we are faithless, he remains faithful — for he cannot deny himself." If we walked as He would have us walk, the world, the flesh and the devil could not prevail against us. Whenever we find ourselves under the power of our enemies, we must charge the fault to ourselves, not to God... Nothing can weaken our hands but sin; "he who is in you is greater than he who is in the world."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Sentence That Explains Every Defeat

The closing clause of the verse is treated as a diagnosis that reaches far past Midian.

But notice the solemn words at the end of verse 10: "But you have not obeyed my voice." Here lies the secret of the poverty and distress that had overwhelmed Israel, and here lies the secret of every difficulty and defeat, of all lack of spiritual prosperity and power. If we have to mourn today the poverty of the church generally, or the lack of freshness and blessing in our own souls, we may trace that condition back to disobedience to the Word of God.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace first. God opens by listing what He gave — rescue from Egypt, victory, a land. Only after that goodness does the charge land.

- Then the claim. "I am the LORD your God" is the ground of the one command He recalls: do not fear gods that He had already defeated for them.

- Then the silence. The prophet names the failure, offers no cure, and leaves. The word reveals their condition before relief comes.

- Then the blame. Their poverty traces to their own disobedience, never to a change in God, who remains faithful and cannot deny Himself.

- Then us. God still wants His people's affections for Himself, and nothing but sin can weaken our hands.

Judges 6:11 · Darby

And an angel of Jehovah came and sat under the terebinth that was in Ophrah, that [belonged] to Joash the Abi-ezrite. And his son Gideon threshed wheat in the winepress, to secure [it] from the Midianites.

Midian had overrun Israel, and Gideon was reduced to hiding grain from them. Then God moved. He sent no army — He sent a visitor to one man at work. Who is this visitor? Why is Gideon threshing in a winepress? And why did God's choice fall on him?

God's Order of Rescue

The cry of an oppressed people is met in two stages, and the second stage begins here.

First, the Lord sent a prophet to bring their sin home to their conscience. Then He sent an angel to raise up a deliverer. And He finds Gideon threshing wheat by the winepress to hide it from the Midianites.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Day of Small Things

Set this scene beside Joshua's conquest and Israel's fall is plain. Yet the comparison turns out in God's favour.

Joshua could place his foot on the necks of the kings of Canaan. Gideon had to thresh his wheat in a corner to hide it from the Midianites. The day of Joshua was marked by splendid victories; the day of Gideon was a day of small things. But the day of small things for man is the day of great things for God. So Gideon found it... His was a day of barley cakes and broken pitchers, not of astounding miracles and brilliant achievements. But God was with him; and this was enough.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Who Sat Under the Tree

The visitor under the tree is more than a messenger. The work He interrupts also carries a picture.

The angel of the Lord, who is the Lord Himself, came to the home of Gideon the son of Joash. He sat down and appeared to Gideon as he was threshing wheat by the winepress. There he could stay hidden from the Midianites (v.11). Gideon's threshing wheat is a picture of one studying the Word of God, separating the chaff of one's own ideas from the pure seed of the truth of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Wheat: Fed in Secret

The verse names what Gideon was threshing, and that detail carries weight.

We may name this first qualification — feeding on Christ in secret. Wheat is surely a figure of Christ (see John 12:24; John 6:35). It was a time of great difficulty. Idols had taken the place of the Lord. So those who stayed faithful while everything fell apart could only worship the Lord alone and in private. It was the same with Gideon. Baal had an altar in his father's house. But this "mighty man of valor" threshed wheat alone to find food, despite the watchful eye of the Midianites. Alone in his family, and alone in threshing wheat, he gathered strength from communion with the Lord.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Winepress as Hiding Place

A winepress was the last place a raider would look for grain. The picture goes deeper.

The winepress reminds us of the blood of the grape, and of His blood which cleanses from all sin. It may well then suggest the cross, the winepress for Him. And the cross is a real shelter and hiding place for faith from all the power of the world. We take our place by the cross, and no Midianite dare dispute our position.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Names in the Verse

The verse records the names Joash and Abiezer. One writer reads them for their meaning.

His father was Joash, the son of Abiezer — "despairing," the son of "my father is help." The one who despairs of any other help, and knows his own weakness, will turn to the Father. In Him alone our help is found.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why This Man

Nothing about the scene suggests a national deliverer. That is the point.

Nothing could have been more wretched than Gideon's condition here. He was threshing wheat in secret, for fear of the Midianites, to feed his family! But here is one whom the Spirit of God delights to mention; whose name, unrecorded by men, is thought worthy to be recorded by Him (Hebrews 11:32-34). The Spirit of God writes to magnify the grace of God, not to exalt man. He would have us remember small incidents like this one in the history of the soldiers of faith. Then we may see by what weak and insignificant instruments God works. His mightiest victories have always been won by such, and not by those who had resources in themselves.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Hidden — God finds His deliverer in a winepress, doing in secret work that no one sees.

- Fed — The wheat he saved pictures Christ. Feeding on Him in secret is the first qualification for service.

- Sheltered — The winepress that hid him speaks of the cross. There faith takes a place the world cannot dispute.

- Weak — Nothing in Gideon's situation qualified him. The Spirit records the small details so the glory lands on God.

- Found — The Lord Himself came and sat down beside that hidden work. Man's day of small things became God's day of great things.

Judges 6:12 · Darby

And the Angel of Jehovah appeared to him, and said to him, Jehovah is with thee, thou mighty man of valour.

Gideon is beating out wheat inside a winepress, hiding it from Midianite raiders, when a visitor greets him with a title that fits nobody in the scene. Who is speaking, and how can a man in hiding be called mighty?

The Visitor

The one who speaks is called "the angel of the LORD," but writers point out that He speaks and acts as God Himself:

An angel of the LORD (Jehovah) appeared to Gideon. He was a young man threshing wheat by the winepress, hiding it from the raiding Midianites. The Angel of the LORD, Jehovah Himself, astonished the young man by saying, "The LORD is with you, you mighty man of valour." At once He commissioned him to be the deliverer of Israel from the yoke of Midian.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

A Day Of Small Things

The greeting lands in the poorest possible setting. One writer sets Gideon beside Joshua, who had once conquered this same land:

Joshua could put his foot on the necks of the kings of Canaan. Gideon had to thresh his wheat in a corner to hide it from the Midianites. The day of Joshua was marked by splendid victories; the day of Gideon was a day of small things. But the day of small things for man is the day of great things for God. So Gideon found it... His was a day of barley cakes and broken pitchers, not of astonishing miracles and brilliant achievements. But God was with him; and this was enough.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What God Saw In The Winepress

Nothing in the scene justified the title. But God saw courage in the very work that looked like fear:

At first sight he might seem like anything but a man of valour. He is in hiding. A man of valour would be facing the enemy, leading the people against them, and driving them from the land. But God does not see as man sees. He sees the valour in that determination to get the wheat at any cost. He knows the purposes of heart that are forming, even if Gideon himself does not know it. And He sees that it is all bound up with that lowly work of beating out the wheat.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Name Makes The Man

The title was not praise for what Gideon already was. Nothing about him or his family pointed that way:

What a remarkable greeting! Secretly threshing wheat to hide it from the enemy did not look like valour! To the human eye everything about him showed a crushed spirit. But God's "mighty men" have always been complete cowards in themselves, men who distrusted their own strength and wisdom in facing the enemy — "out of weakness made strong." Nobody is a "mighty man of valour" except those to whom it has been said, "The Lord is with you." When God calls a person by a name, He makes that person what the name means; but He takes the lowest man of a lowly tribe to make him His "mighty man of valour."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Might Borrowed, Not Owned

Where, then, was the strength? Writers place it outside Gideon altogether:

"You mighty man of valour!" How hard it was for Gideon to take such astonishing words in! How difficult to apply them to himself! Where was the might, or where was the valour? Certainly not in himself or in his surroundings. Where then? In the living God; exactly where Joshua found his might and his valour.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Because the strength was God's, Gideon's smallness was beside the point:

Gideon's family might be the poorest in Manasseh, and he himself the least in his father's house. But what did Gideon's poverty or his weakness matter, if the Lord, who is rich and mighty, was for him and with him?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Gideon's Reply

Gideon answers with a question about the whole nation, not about himself:

Gideon said to him, "Oh my Lord, if Jehovah is with us" — that is where he takes his stand. He says "if Jehovah is with us", not just "with me". He ties the people to the name of Jehovah, not just to himself. That is always the mark of true faith and love.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Gideon was slow to take that word for himself, and we are no different:

And yet Gideon was slow to make these words his own — slow to grasp them with that lovely appropriating power of faith which so delights the heart of God... We are prone to reason about ourselves and our situation, instead of believing God. We fail to rest quietly in His perfect love and unfailing faithfulness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Presence first. The Lord tells Gideon He is with him before He gives any command. The commission rests on that, not on Gideon's resources.

- Presence names. When God calls a person by a name, He makes that person what the name means.

- Presence sees. God read valour in a man secretly saving wheat, because He does not see as man sees.

- Presence supplies. The might is borrowed. It lies in the living God, where Joshua also found his, so Gideon's poverty counts for nothing.

- Presence must be believed. Gideon was slow to make the words his own. We face the same choice: reason about ourselves, or rest in His unfailing faithfulness.

Judges 6:13 · Darby

And Gideon said to him, Ah my Lord, if Jehovah be with us, why then is all this befallen us? and where are all his miracles that our fathers told us of, saying, Did not Jehovah bring us up from Egypt? And now Jehovah hath cast us off, and given us into the hand of Midian.

A stranger greets Gideon as a mighty man of valour and tells him the LORD is with him. Gideon answers with a protest — the question every believer knows: if God is with us, why does everything look like He has left?

The "If" That Reasons From Circumstances

God's word to Gideon carried no conditions. Gideon answered it with one small word.

Here Gideon reasons from his surroundings. That is where the "if" comes from — that little word of unbelief. His surroundings were of the gloomiest kind. But one bright ray shone in on his depressed spirit. It came from the very heart of God, carried in one short but complete sentence: "The LORD is with you." There was no "if" in this — no doubt, no difficulty, no reserve, no condition. It needed only one thing to become a spring of joy, strength and victory in Gideon's soul: Gideon had to mix it with faith. But "if" is not faith. True faith never answers God with ifs, for the simplest of reasons: it looks only at God, and there are no ifs with Him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Question Already Had an Answer

Gideon asks why all this has happened, as if no one could say. His nation's own past held the answer.

If Gideon had looked back over his nation's history, he might have found plenty of reason for the sad and humbling state he was in. Those stained pages would have given a full answer to his question, "Why then has all this happened to us?" But had Israel's behaviour dimmed the brightness of the LORD's mighty wonders? Not in the sight of faith. God had done great and glorious things for His people, and the record of those deeds lay always under the eye of faith to sustain the soul. Israel had failed — failed shamefully — and the record of that failure lay under the eye of faith too. Faith recognises God's government as well as His grace. It bows in awe before every stroke of His governing rod.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

He Said "Us," Not "Me"

The greeting was personal — the LORD is with you. Gideon refuses to keep it personal.

Gideon said to him, "Please, my lord, if the LORD is with us" — for on that he takes his stand — "if the LORD is with us" — not merely "with me." He binds the people together with the name of the LORD, and not merely with himself — the unfailing mark of true faith and love. "But now the LORD has forsaken us and given us into the hand of Midian." Both were true. It was the LORD who had blessed them. It was the LORD who had handed them over to Midian. That very fact, overwhelming as it is, is exactly what gives confidence. If the Midianites had simply got the better of Israel, that would be nothing for faith.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

There is a right way to measure the state of God's people, and a wrong one.

He has a deep sense of Israel's condition on his soul, though he has no power to help them. He has been comparing that condition with the LORD's title and power. This is the way of faith. It is not for us to compare ourselves with each other; we should compare our condition with the LORD's title and will to bless.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

"The LORD Has Forsaken Us"

Gideon drew his conclusion about God from the wrong starting point.

Gideon had much to learn. His faith was very weak, for he did not count on the goodness of God. Humble, no doubt, but looking at himself, he decided what God must be towards him from what he himself was. "Now," he said, "the LORD has forsaken us." The situation is hopeless, because it is the result of our unfaithfulness. That was Gideon's reasoning — but did God reason like that? "The LORD is with you, you mighty man of valour." How little he knew what was in the heart of God, and how many there are who reason like Gideon.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Complaint Was the Strength

Gideon's protest is not weakness. It is what made him strong.

What was Gideon's might? It was his awareness that things were not what they ought to be. Things were different from what they used to be, and he wanted in his heart to do something to put them right. Suppose we see that things in our own lives, and in the shared testimony, are not as good as they used to be. That will make us ask why. Once we know, we will be very concerned, and we will spend prayer and energy to make it better. But if we go along quite comfortably saying, "Well, everything is all right," and are not much concerned, I do not think things will get better.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Summary

- The "if" exposes the eye. Gideon reasons up from his circumstances. Faith reasons down from God, who set no condition on "The LORD is with you."

- The "why" had an answer. Israel's own history explained the trouble. Faith bows before God's government as it rests in His grace.

- The "us" proves the man. He would not take the promise alone. Tying the whole people to God's name is the mark of true faith and love.

- The "forsaken" was a misreading. Gideon judged what God would be to him by what he was himself — the mistake of a humble man with weak faith.

- The ache became the might. The sense that things are wrong was Gideon's strength. If we are not concerned, things do not get better.

Judges 6:14 · Darby

And Jehovah looked upon him, and said, Go in this thy might, and thou shalt save Israel from the hand of Midian. Have not I sent thee?

Gideon is saving wheat from raiders when God calls him a mighty man of valour and sends him to save Israel. The strength God points him to is a strength he cannot feel. The verse turns on two things: a look from God, and a question that ends all argument.

The Look Before the Command

Some translations render the opening words as "the Lord looked upon him." The command to go is not the first thing in the verse. God turns toward Gideon first.

Here we have the true secret of strength: "The Lord looked upon him." There was divine power in this look, if Gideon could only have taken it in. But sadly, he was still full of questions.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

That look is God taking sides. It puts God's own resources behind a man who has none.

Gideon sees the Lord's hand upon His people, and that it is because of sin. But he identifies himself with the people... The Lord looked upon him. That is the first thing. The man who is really strong and mighty is the one who has come into the secret of Israel's poverty in this way. The Lord has looked upon him. The Lord has identified Himself with him, and shown His heart to be towards him. There is no limit to the might of such a man.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"This Might" — Something Already There

God does not hand Gideon a new power. He points back to what Gideon was already doing: getting his own food at real risk.

It is such a man that God can use as His instrument to deliver Israel. Notice, He does not give him fresh might, but counts the might he had already shown as enough to deliver Israel... God emphasizes the courage of a faith that gets its own food at all hazards.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where that might sits matters. It is not something Gideon owns.

Gideon, whose name means "a great warrior" (an overcomer), seeks to preserve the wheat from the enemy... The exercises of the threshing floor are plain to see. Self-importance, self-confidence and self-seeking have gone. His faith in what God has done and can do is clear. His "might" (v.14) is not connected with what he is in himself, but with his faith in God, and his obedience to God's command.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

"Do Not I Send You?"

In the next verse Gideon lists his disadvantages: a poor family, and the smallest place in it. God's question does not answer that list. It ends it.

His family is poor in Manasseh, and like David, he is the least in his father's house. Yet, what of all this? "Have not I sent you?" withers up all such thoughts, and places a living reality before the soul.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

The size of the instrument is not the question. The one who uses it is.

Unbelief turns the eye in upon self, or out upon our surroundings. It leads us to compare our visible resources with the work God is calling us to... It made very plain that the might he would deliver Israel with was not in himself or in his father's house. It was in the God of Israel. It mattered little whether his family was rich or poor; whether he was little or great. It was God who was about to use him. What was wealth or greatness to Him? He could use a barley cake or a broken pitcher.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Weakness Is Not the Obstacle

Gideon feels smaller after the call than before it. For faith's soldiers that is normal, not failure.

So it always is with the soldiers of faith. They have never felt their own weakness so much as when they are called to be God's mighty men of valour... People often say, "I want to feel that I am strong." What we need is to feel that we are weak; this brings in Omnipotence. We shall have a life of feeling later on in the glory. Now we are called to live a life of faith.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What God saw in Gideon was not confidence but care for a beaten people.

Gideon might well wonder what might the Lord was speaking of, for Gideon only felt weakness. But Gideon had strength he was not aware of. He had a heart of true concern for his people, even while he felt his own helplessness. In God's eyes that was strength. Paul later learned this valuable lesson — "when I am weak, then I am strong" (2 Cor. 12:10).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Look first. God turns toward Gideon before He commands him. The call carries its weight because God identifies Himself with the man.

- Might already shown. God gives no new power. He counts the courage Gideon has already shown as enough.

- Not in himself. His might lies in his faith in God and his obedience, not in his family, his rank or his resources.

- Sending settles it. God's question — "do not I send you?" — ends the list of disadvantages. He is the one using the instrument, and He can work with a barley cake or a broken pitcher.

- Weakness admits Omnipotence. Faith's soldiers feel weakest when God calls them. A heart burdened for God's people is strength in His eyes.

Judges 6:15 · Darby

And he said to him, Ah Lord, wherewith shall I save Israel? behold, my thousand is the poorest in Manasseh, and I am the least in my father's house.

God has just told Gideon to go and save Israel. Gideon answers by measuring the job against his family record: his clan is the weakest, and he is the least in it. Does a man's sense of his own nothingness rule him out of God's service, or is it the very thing that makes him useful?

The description was accurate

Gideon is not exaggerating. One writer lays out the details side by side.

He himself was even weaker than his people. He had no confidence in front of the enemy, for he was "beating out wheat in the winepress to hide it from the Midianites" (v. 11). He had no resources among his relatives, for his family was the poorest in Manasseh. He had no power in himself, for he was the least in his father's house (v. 15). That was the man God visited and chose as His servant — a man who knew how utterly weak he was... When it comes to the work of God in this world, we meet a first great principle: God never asks what man can offer Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Nothingness as a qualification

Writers do not treat this confession as a setback. They call it a qualification, and it moves the question away from Gideon altogether.

Here we get another very important qualification — a sense of his own nothingness... And all the Lord's servants must learn this lesson sooner or later. There is nothing in themselves, in their position, or in their circumstances that God can use. In a word, all our resources and all our strength lie outside of ourselves, in Him. Our sufficiency is of God. It is then no longer a question of what the Midianites are, but of what God is, for we go to meet them in His strength.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why God empties a man first

God lets Gideon feel his poverty at the very moment He sends him. The reason concerns who gets the credit for the victory.

When God is about to use a man, He makes that man keenly aware that he is nothing in himself. If He delivers by Gideon's hand, He must have the glory, not Gideon. The strength must be His, not Gideon's. Strong in the Lord, we are weakest in ourselves. Can we not nearly always trace our failures back to self-confidence?

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Looking in the wrong direction

Not every writer treats the reply as pure humility. Gideon asks what he has to save Israel with, and that question points him the wrong way.

Unbelief turns the eye in on self, or out on our surroundings. It leads us to compare the resources we can see with the work God is calling us to... God's word left no room for Gideon's "how?" It made it very plain that the might he was to deliver Israel with was not in himself or in his father's house, but in the God of Israel. It mattered little whether his family was rich or poor, whether he was small or great. It was God who was about to use him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer puts it more sharply still — a low view of yourself can be as much a hindrance as a high one.

But Gideon, like Moses and many another servant of God, has to come right to the end of himself. He must be done with his humility as well as his pride... He speaks of the poverty of his family, and of how small he is in his father's house. But what have these to do with the living God?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What God answers with

God never disputes the facts Gideon lists. He answers with two things: a commission and a promise of His presence.

First, we have God's commission, wrapped up in those weighty words, "Do not I send you?" Second, we have the assurance of God's presence, set out in these encouraging words, "But I will be with you."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Once those two are in place, the size of Gideon's clan stops counting. The same pattern shows up later in Israel's history.

Gideon's family might be the poorest in Manasseh, and he himself the least in his father's house. But what did Gideon's poverty or his weakness matter, if the Lord, who is rich and mighty, was for him and with him? So, in a later day, Jonathan and his armour-bearer could face a huge army in the might of the Lord. As Jonathan said, "nothing can hinder the LORD from saving by many or by few" (1 Samuel 14:6).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Least is true. Gideon's account of himself is honest at every level: hiding from the enemy, poorest clan, smallest man in the house.

- Least is the qualification. Writers call his sense of his own nothingness a qualification for service, not a disqualification.

- Least protects the glory. God makes a man feel he is nothing, so that God gets the glory for the rescue and the man does not.

- Least can still be unbelief. His "how?" turned his eye inward. One writer says he had to finish with his humility as well as his pride.

- Least plus God is enough. God's reply is a commission and a promise: "Do not I send you?" and "But I will be with you." Poverty stops counting when the Lord who is rich and mighty is the one sending.

Judges 6:16 · Darby

And Jehovah said to him, I will certainly be with thee; and thou shalt smite Midian as one man.

Gideon has just answered God's call by pointing to his poor clan and his own low place in it. The reply never argues with him: it promises God's own presence, and a whole army falling as if it were one man.

No Weapon, but a Presence

Gideon asked what he was supposed to fight with. God's answer names no weapon. It names His presence, and the victory follows from that. (Older translations read "Surely I will be with you"; the ESV has "But I will be with you.")

As with David in another fight of faith, there was no sword in Gideon's hand, nothing at all to go against the Midianites with. But what does that matter? "If God is for us, who can be against us?" He does not go out unarmed. "Surely I will be with you [and as a consequence of that], you shall strike the Midianites as one man."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The call stands whether Gideon feels ready or not.

The Lord allows Gideon no excuse. He has called Gideon and Gideon must obey. But He encourages Gideon by His Word.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Emptiness Comes First

The promise comes only after Gideon sees himself as nothing. That emptiness is not a delay in the story. It is the preparation.

He was now in the place where God's power could come upon and use him. The same was true of the apostle Paul. The thorn in the flesh searched his heart. It brought him face to face with his own complete powerlessness, and with his lack of any natural fitness for the Lord's service. Only then could the Lord say to him, "My grace is sufficient for you." Every servant of the Lord must learn this lesson sooner or later. There is nothing in ourselves, in our position, or in our circumstances that God can use. In a word, all our resources and strength lie outside ourselves, in Himself.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how to read Gideon's protest. Dennett hears humility that fitted him for service. Ridout hears "humble pride" — a fault, though one word from God was enough to remove it.

The Missing Link Supplied

Believing that all power belongs to God is not the same as seeing that power move on your behalf. Without the second, the first can crush a person.

There is a great difference between owning that all power belongs to God, and seeing that power act on our behalf. Often the first conviction only makes us feel our own powerlessness more. And unless we can rest on God acting for us and through us, that feeling will produce despondency. Gideon cannot see how a link can be formed between God and man, so that a man carries out God's power and will. So he pleads how small and unfit he is. To form this link in his soul, the Lord gives him a promise.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

"As One Man"

God's promise does not reduce the number of Midianites. It changes how faith counts them.

See with what grace God rebukes this bit of humble pride in Gideon. It clearly was not deep-seated: one word was enough to displace it. "Surely I will be with you, and you shall strike the Midianites as one man." After all, the enemy is, for faith, but a single one. He is a whole army when he oppresses and terrifies. But the moment faith asserts itself, there is only one man, as when David met the giant.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Instrument Counts for Nothing

If all the strength is God's, the size or ability of the person He sends stops mattering. That truth kills two opposite errors at once.

The humbler the instrument, the more we see the power of God. What difference does it make to the Almighty God whether His instrument is left-handed or right-handed — a man or a woman — a dwarf or a giant? The instrument is nothing. God is all in all... Let us remember these things, so that we may walk humbly and lean always and only on the mighty arm of the living God. This keeps the soul well balanced. It is free from self-confidence and the excitement of the flesh on one side, and from gloom and depression on the other. If we can do nothing, self-confidence is the height of presumption. If God can do everything, despondency is the height of folly.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Emptied. Gideon's sense of being the least is not an obstacle God has to work around. It is the place where God's power can rest on a man, as it rested on Paul.

- Promised. God answers that emptiness with no argument and no weapon. He answers with Himself, and one word forms the link between His power and a weak man.

- Consequence. The victory hangs on the first half of the sentence. Because He is with Gideon, and only because of that, Midian falls.

- Shrunken. The moment faith stirs, a terrifying army counts as one man. David saw the same thing when he faced the giant.

- Balanced. We can do nothing, so self-confidence is presumption. God can do everything, so gloom is folly. His presence removes both.

Judges 6:17 · Darby

And he said to him, If now I have found favour in thine eyes, shew me a sign that it is thou who talkest with me.

The Lord has just promised Gideon His presence and victory over Midian. Gideon's answer is to ask for proof that the speaker under the oak is who He says He is. So is this a weak believer's fear, or a real faith reaching out — and why does God give the sign instead of rebuking him?

Asking after God has already spoken

Gideon asks for a sign after God has already given His word. One writer names both the weakness in that and the one thing Gideon truly wanted.

There is weakness here, no doubt; he should have had simple confidence and not needed a sign. Still, all he really cares for is having the Lord with him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer puts Gideon beside others who asked God to say more than He had already said.

Unbelief then draws its plea from the Lord. It assumes, as it were, that there was something unclear in the revelation God has just given. "If you are the Christ, tell us plainly." Gideon was in this frame of mind in Judges 6:17; and John the Baptist, in his measure, in Matthew 11:3.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

God answers rather than rebukes

One writer admits the weakness in Gideon's asking, then points to what came after it.

He asks for a sign, it is true; and the Lord answers. I am far from denying that there was weakness in Gideon's faith. Nor am I saying there was no drawback here, as with all the others we have looked at. But even allowing all this, we must admit what followed. After the Lord stooped in grace to his weakness, we find the power of God at work in his heart and in his ways.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The gift Gideon wanted to bring

Gideon also wants to bring the visitor a gift. One writer sees in that wish how much Gideon still had to learn about himself.

His faith was very weak, because he did not count on the goodness of God. He was humble, no doubt, but he looked at himself, and from what he was he decided what God must be to him. Even with his humility, there had not yet been true self-judgment. He wanted to offer something, to "bring forth his present" to the Lord (v. 18). He was not trying to do something great for God. He thought that all would be well if God accepted his gift.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Lord's reply changes what the gift is. He tells Gideon to lay it on the rock.

We have already seen that Gideon wanted to offer something to the Lord, but He can accept nothing from man as such. "Take the flesh and the unleavened cakes," He said, "and lay them on this rock, and pour out the broth" (v. 20). The only offering God can accept is Christ. If He did not receive what Gideon offered Him, He accepted what represented Christ in it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A better sign than he asked for

Another writer looks at what Gideon laid on the rock and at the fire that took it up. In that, he says, the sign itself becomes a picture of Christ.

All is put on the rock, another figure of Christ, and fire carries it all up to God. So we might say he brought nothing but Christ, whom God always accepts. What better sign could he, or we, want than that? Suppose we have nothing but Christ, His work and His person. Then God's acceptance of Him is our fullest assurance and pledge that we shall be "more than conquerors through him who loved us."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Peace before service

The sign leads to a discovery Gideon had not asked for. Seeing the angel face to face terrifies him, and God's reply settles him.

Gideon cried "alas!" and the Lord answered, "Peace; do not fear." Then he was ready to begin. The Lord had brought him face to face with the angel of God. There he learned that his family was poor in Manasseh and that he was the least in his father's house. He learned more than that: in himself he had no power at all, and all his resources must come from the living God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Peace is not only relief for Gideon. Another writer counts it as part of what fits a person for service.

From the Lord he gets a further qualification for service: a soul at liberty, at peace before God... Everyone will understand that there can be no true or effective service for the Lord while the soul is taken up with its own condition. It must first be free and at home in God's presence.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Word first. God had already promised His presence; the request for a sign came after the promise, not before it.

- Weakness met. God stooped to Gideon's weak faith instead of rebuking it. His power then worked in Gideon's heart and ways.

- Gift refused. God could not accept Gideon's gift from him as he was. He took only what represented Christ in it.

- Sign given. Fire from the rock burned up the offering. The answer was God's acceptance of Christ, not just a proof of who was speaking.

- Peace produced. The encounter ended in "peace, do not fear," and that freed soul — not the sign itself — was what made him ready to serve.

Judges 6:18 · Darby

Depart not hence, I pray thee, until I come unto thee, and bring forth my present, and set it before thee. And he said, I will tarry until thou come again.

God has just promised Gideon that he will strike down Midian. Instead of moving out, Gideon asks his visitor to wait while he fetches something to set before Him. The verse holds two things at once: a man who still needs proof, and a Lord who is willing to wait for him.

A request that shows weak faith

Gideon asks for a sign right after a direct promise. Commentators call that weak faith — and still point to what he wants most.

There is weakness here, no doubt; he should have had simple confidence, and not have needed a sign. Still, all he really cares about is having Jehovah with him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why he needed proof before he could move

God had already given the promise. Gideon needed something else before he could act on it.

Great as this promise was, Gideon could not yet take it as his own. However wonderful and fitting it was, he could not embrace it. First he had to feel in his own soul the link between himself and God, and know that God accepted him... He had asked for a sign so that his soul could trust the help God promised — in a word, so that he might depend on Him in the great service given to him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What "my present" reveals about him

Gideon wants to bring "my present" to his visitor. One writer asks what that impulse says about the man.

Moreover, despite his humility, he had not yet truly judged himself. He wanted to offer something, to "bring out his present" to Jehovah (v. 18). It was surely not with the idea of doing something great for God, but with the thought that all would be well if God accepted his present.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"I will stay till you return"

Gideon already has God's word, and still asks Him to stay. The answer he gets is a kindness.

But Gideon wants more confirmation, as though he needed it once God had given him His word! Yet the Lord graciously answered Gideon's request and stayed until Gideon brought an offering (v. 18). To Gideon's credit, the offering was very fitting. The young goat is a picture of Christ as the Substitute for the sinner — and Gideon knew he needed a Substitute.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The gift redirected

Gideon brings his present. God never takes it from his hands as a gift. He sends it to the rock instead.

We have already seen that Gideon wanted to offer something to Jehovah, but He can accept nothing from man as man. "Take the flesh and the unleavened cakes," He said, "and lay them on this rock, and pour the broth over them" (v. 20). The only offering God can accept is Christ. He did not receive what Gideon offered Him, but He accepted what represented Christ in it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The sign he asked for, answered in a sacrifice

Gideon wanted proof that he was speaking with God. What he brought to the rock turned out to be the proof.

More than that, Gideon wants to bring an offering; he will be a worshipper. So he brings a young goat, flour and unleavened cakes. All these speak of Christ... It is all put on the rock, another figure of Christ, and fire carries it all up to God. So we might say he brought nothing but Christ, whom God always accepts. What better sign could he — or we — want than that? If we have nothing but Christ, His work and His person, we may be sure that God's acceptance of Him is the fullest assurance and pledge that we shall be "more than conquerors through Him who loved us."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where the whole exchange lands him

Gideon asked for a sign. What he got was a lesson about himself.

His "Alas!" was followed by the Lord's "Peace; do not fear," and then he was ready to begin. He had been brought face to face with the angel of God. There he learned that his family was poor in Manasseh and he the least in his father's house. He also learned that in himself he was completely powerless, and that he must find all his resources in the living God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Ask. Gideon's plea for a sign was weak faith. He should have rested on the word already given. Yet what he wanted was the Lord's presence, not an excuse.

- Wait. "I will stay till you return." God grants what He does not owe, and meets a man where his faith stands.

- Bring. The "present" exposed a heart that still thought all would be well if God accepted his gift. Gideon had not yet judged himself.

- Exchange. God takes nothing from man as man. He moves the gift onto the rock and accepts only what pictures Christ in it.

- Send. The sign and the worship are one act. Face to face with God, Gideon learns he is powerless, hears "Peace; do not fear," and is ready to begin.

Judges 6:19 · Darby

And Gideon went in, and made ready a kid of the goats, and an ephah of flour in unleavened cakes the flesh he put in a basket, and he put the broth in a pot, and brought it out to him under the terebinth, and presented it.

God has just told Gideon to go and save Israel. Gideon asks the visitor under the tree to wait while he goes home and prepares a meal. Was this food for a guest, or an offering to God?

A Gift Meant as a Test

Gideon had already been given God's word and God's promise. Bringing out his present was his way of finding out whether the one speaking to him was who he seemed to be.

Gideon would prove, then, his visitor with an offering, and significantly brings him Abraham's offering of an ephah — that is, three measures — of flour; but Abraham's gift is of fine flour; and instead of Abraham's calf he brings a kid. Though less full a type than that in Genesis, Gideon's offering still speaks of Christ.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

There was something unfinished in the impulse. One writer reads Gideon's request in verse 18 as the mark of a man who had not yet stopped measuring God by himself:

Yet despite his humility, he had not yet truly judged himself. He wanted to offer something, to bring out his present to the LORD (v. 18). He did not mean to do some great thing for God. He was thinking, no doubt, that all would be well if God accepted his present.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What Gideon Actually Carried Out

The items are not random. Each one is a familiar element of Israel's sacrifices, and commentators read them together as a picture of Christ.

More than that, Gideon wants to bring an offering. He will be a worshiper. So he brings the familiar sacrifice — a kid, an ephah of flour and unleavened cakes. All these speak of Christ. The kid here seems to be a peace-offering, yet it also brings sin to mind, since it was the animal most often used for sin in the offerings of the law. It reminds us of Christ made sin for us, and also of the One who is fully acceptable to God. The unleavened cakes and the fine flour belong with the kid. They recall the spotless person of Christ, as the kid pictured His work... If we have nothing but Christ, His work and His person, we can be sure that God's acceptance of Him is the fullest pledge that we shall be "more than conquerors through Him who loved us."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Quantity That Links Three Scenes

The amount of flour matters. The same measure turns up at only two other meetings with God.

Three measures is the same amount as an ephah. Only three other passages in Scripture speak of this quantity of flour, and in every one it is without leaven. Abraham offered cakes of this quantity to the three visitors at his tent door, and he recognised one of them to be his Lord. Gideon did the same when the Angel of the LORD appeared to him as he threshed wheat. Hannah brought this much flour as her offering when she presented Samuel to the Lord at the tabernacle at Shiloh (Gen. 18:1–8; Jdg. 6:19; 1 Sam. 1:24).

Modernised from Simon AttwoodOriginal wording

The Broth in the Pot

Commentators differ over the broth. One takes it as evidence of how little Gideon grasped:

This man of God understood very little of the value of the sacrifices the LORD had commanded Israel. The broth in the pot showed how little he knew. But God saw what was real underneath this feeble faith, and accepted the offering when Gideon laid it on the rock.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer reads the broth in Gideon's favour:

To Gideon's credit, the offering was very fitting. The young goat is typical of Christ as the Substitute for the sinner, and Gideon knew that he needed a Substitute. The broth seems to show how much the offerer valued the sacrifice, since broth is easy to take in.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God Would Not Take It From His Hands

Gideon brought food to eat. The visitor told him to put it on a rock instead.

We have already seen that Gideon wished to offer something to the LORD, but He can accept nothing from man as such. "Take the meat and the unleavened cakes, and put them on this rock, and pour the broth over them," He said (v. 20). The only offering which God can accept is Christ. If He did not receive what Gideon offered Him, He accepted what represented Christ in it. The fire of judgment rose up out of the rock and consumed the meat and the unleavened cakes. The proof of God's interest in him was, in figure, the judgment that fell on Christ.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

From Accepted Offering to Fearless Service

The fire left Gideon in terror. One writer shows what took the terror away:

God had revealed Himself to His servant, and the effect was terror. But the terror passed away when the LORD spoke peace to him. We need not say more about this, since it is the story of every soul that God brings into His presence... While the soul is taken up with its own condition, there can be no true or effective service for the Lord. That service comes only when the soul is set free and at home in God's presence.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Brought. Gideon was humble, yet he still hoped that all would be well if God accepted his present.

- Christ. The goat, the unleavened cakes and the flour all speak of Christ — the goat of His work, the flour of His spotless person.

- Measured. Abraham and Hannah brought this same ephah of flour, each time without leaven, each time to God.

- Refused. God took nothing from Gideon's hands. Fire consumed the food on the rock, and God accepted it only for what it stood for: Christ.

- Freed. After the fire the LORD spoke peace to Gideon, and only a soul at rest in God's presence can serve God.

Judges 6:20 · Darby

And the Angel of God said to him, Take the flesh and the unleavened cakes, and lay them upon this rock, and pour out the broth. And he did so.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 6:21 · Darby

And the Angel of Jehovah put forth the end of the staff that was in his hand, and touched the flesh and the unleavened cakes; and there rose up fire out of the rock, and consumed the flesh and the unleavened cakes. And the Angel of Jehovah departed out of his sight.

Gideon had asked for a sign that it was really the LORD speaking to him. He brought out a meal — a young goat, unleavened cakes and broth. What came back was not power over Midian, but fire on an offering. Commentators see the cross in that moment.

The only offering God can accept

The angel refused the meal as a meal. He told Gideon to lay the meat and the cakes on the rock and pour the broth away. Henri Rossier sees in that God's refusal of anything a man brings on his own:

We have already seen that Gideon wanted to offer something to the LORD, but He can accept nothing that comes from man himself. "Take," He said, "the flesh and the unleavened cakes, and lay them upon this rock, and pour out the broth" (v. 20). The only offering God can accept is Christ. He did not receive what Gideon offered Him, but He accepted what represented Christ in it.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Every part of it speaks of Christ

Each part of the meal is a picture. The goat, the cakes and even the rock they lie on point one way. Samuel Ridout says the sign Gideon was given is the sign we still rest on:

The kid here seems to be a peace offering, but it also suggests sin, since that is what it was most often used for in Israel's sacrifices. So it reminds us of Christ made sin for us, and also of the One who is perfectly acceptable to God. The unleavened cakes and the fine flour belong with the kid, and recall the spotless person of Christ, as the kid recalled His work. It all goes on the rock, another figure of Christ, and fire carries it all up to God. So we might say he brought nothing but Christ, whom God always accepts. What better sign could he, or we, want than that?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Fire from below, not from heaven

The fire does not fall from the sky. It comes up out of the rock the offering rests on. Rossier calls that fire judgment. He notes that Gideon's pot of broth showed how little he understood:

This man of God understood very little of the value of the sacrifices the LORD had commanded Israel. "The broth in the pot" showed his ignorance. But God saw what was real under this weak faith, and He accepted the offering when Gideon laid it "on the rock." The fire of judgment rose up out of the rock and consumed the flesh and the unleavened cakes. The proof that God cared for him was, in picture, the judgment that fell on Christ.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The touch of the staff, and the departure

The angel does not eat the meal. He touches it, and then He leaves. One writer compares the scene with Abraham's visitor in Genesis:

Gideon's offering is a less full picture than the one in Genesis, but it still speaks of Christ. The angel holds back more here than there, but there is still acceptance. At his direction Gideon places the offering on the rock. The angel touches it with his staff, and it goes up in fire as an accepted offering. Then the angel himself leaves. There is no power here for lasting communion, as there was with Abraham. Yet Christ, as Representative of His people, accepted in sacrifice on the cross, is declared the ground on which God can be with them to deliver them. And this is the true assurance of ability for the Gideons of any generation.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Settled first, then sent

God had already called Gideon and given him a promise. But one writer says the sign met a deeper need first:

Great as this promise was, Gideon could not yet make it his own. He could not take hold of it until he felt in his own soul the link between himself and God, and was sure of his own acceptance. So the Lord accepts the offering, has it consumed by a miracle, and disappears from Gideon's sight. In this way He gives him unquestionable proof not only of His own presence and power, but also of His servant's acceptance with Him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer turns this into a warning for anyone busy in God's work:

Faith has something to bring to God that He can accept. Whatever our own failure, Jesus is the same, and the value of His work is unchanged... God never says to a soul, "Peace be to you, fear not," because of service. We are in danger of putting service in the place of the burnt offering.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Brought — Gideon brought a meal; God would only take a sacrifice. What He accepted was not Gideon's gift but what represented Christ in it.

- Laid — kid, unleavened cakes and rock are all read as figures of Christ, so that Gideon effectively "brought nothing but Christ, whom God ever accepts."

- Burned — the fire came up out of the rock, a picture of judgment falling on Christ instead of on the man who brought it.

- Accepted — the broth showed how little Gideon understood. Yet "God saw what was real under this weak faith." Faith that is weak but rests on Christ is still accepted.

- Sent — the sign proved "His servant's acceptance with Him." Service never earns the words "Peace be to you"; it follows them.

Judges 6:22 · Darby

And Gideon perceived that he was an angel of Jehovah; and Gideon said, Alas, Lord Jehovah! for because I have seen an angel of Jehovah face to face ...

Fire has just leapt from the rock and burned up the meal Gideon prepared. His visitor then vanished, and only then does the truth hit him. His cry is not joy but alarm. He now knows who had been standing in front of him, and he expects that meeting to cost him his life.

Whom Gideon had been talking to

Gideon does not say he saw "an angel" in general terms. The title he uses is far weightier. It explains why he feared for his life — and also what he did not actually see.

It troubled Gideon to realise how great this person was whom he had seen — the Angel of the Lord, not just "an angel" (v. 22). For God had said to Moses, "man shall not see me and live" (Ex. 33:20). It is true that God's glory is too great for us to take in. But the Angel (the Lord Jesus) had appeared to Gideon in the form of a man. So Gideon did not see the greatness of God's glory, but only a very limited showing of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The recognition came late

What changed here was not the visitor, but what Gideon understood — and the dread did not last.

Gideon does not seem to realise that he has been face to face with the angel of the Lord until He has departed. Then he is overwhelmed with the solemn fact, and dreads the consequences. But grace quickly reassures him, and he builds an altar to the Lord — Jehovah-Shalom, "Jehovah is Peace."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why nearness to God felt like death

This dread was not a one-off panic. Meeting this visitor had the same effect on others in the Old Testament. And it had to happen before Gideon could fight anyone.

The presence of God withered him up, and he knew it. That is the usual effect, seen again and again in the Old Testament, of meeting the one called there the angel of Jehovah. The very thing that passed the sentence of death on his nature also strengthened him. So Gideon builds an altar, trusting the word given to him... This is the prime necessity — peace, then work; but no service is safe until the person is secure and at peace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Faith or feebleness?

Commentators differ on how to read Gideon's alarm. Some see the normal effect of God drawing near. One writer compares Gideon with Abraham, and calls his fear weakness.

This is another mark of weakness. We do not see this fear in Abraham, in similar circumstances. But Jehovah will give Gideon the confidence to stand before Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The sentence that sets a man free

Gideon's instinct — that being this close to God should finish him — was not superstition. One writer takes it as an accurate verdict on human nature, and as the very thing that fits a person for battle.

He is now certain that he has seen the angel of Jehovah face to face. That very certainty makes him afraid, until His word calms him: he will not die. For us too, whenever we grasp that the Lord is present, we also feel the sentence passed on the flesh. This is where the power to walk rightly comes from, and the energy for the warfare we are called to. "Now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself." Christ crucified confirms this sentence, and He is also our deliverance from ourselves. So, "crucified with Christ," we may still live — no longer we, but Christ living in us.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Emptied, then used

One meeting did two things to Gideon at the same time.

Gideon had spoken to Him with a secret sense that it was Jehovah. Now he knows for certain: he has seen the angel of Jehovah, of God, face to face. It was a real revelation. It was enough to reduce him to nothing in himself, and that is what it did. But it was also enough to make him strong in his walk among others, who had not known Jehovah in the same way.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Face — The one Gideon met was the Angel of the Lord, whom one writer names as the Lord Jesus. His terror fits who was standing there.

- Fear — The dread only broke over him once the visitor had gone, and it rested on a known word: no one sees God and lives.

- Flesh — That fear is an accurate sentence on human nature. Anyone brought near to God feels it, and Scripture says: "now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself."

- Freedom — The sentence of death on self is not the end of Gideon. It is the start of his usefulness. Reduced to nothing in himself, he is made strong to stand among people who had never met God like this.

- First things first — Peace comes before work. No service is safe while the servant is unsettled with God. Commentators differ on whether Gideon's alarm was weakness or the right response.

Judges 6:23 · Darby

And Jehovah said to him, Peace be unto thee fear not; thou shalt not die.

Gideon has just realised who his visitor was, and he is sure the sight will cost him his life. God answers with a word of peace, and commentators treat it as the moment Gideon became fit for service.

Why Gideon expected to die

His fear was not superstition. It rested on a word God had already spoken.

Gideon was troubled when he realised the greatness of the person he had seen. It was the Angel of the Lord, not simply "an angel" (v. 22). For God had said to Moses, "man shall not see me and live" (Ex. 33:20). It is true that God's glory is so great that we cannot take it in. But the Angel (the Lord Jesus) had appeared to Gideon in the form of a man. So Gideon did not see the greatness of God's glory, but only a very limited showing of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A word that ends the terror

Nothing Gideon does changes him. God's word does the work, and the same pattern runs through Scripture.

Now Gideon knows that he had seen an angel of the Lord face to face, and he is filled with fear. But the Lord said to him, "Peace be to you. Do not fear; you shall not die." So he receives from the Lord a further qualification for service — a soul at liberty, at peace before God. God had revealed Himself to His servant, and the effect was terror. But the terror passed away when the Lord spoke peace. We need not enlarge on this, as it is the history of every soul brought into the presence of God (see Isa. 6; Job 42; Luke 5).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The ground of Gideon's peace

God speaks peace right after fire consumed the offering on the rock. That order matters.

The fire of judgment consumed the offering, and the result for Gideon was peace. To be a servant of God, you must know the work of Christ for yourself, and the peace that flows from it. You must be sure that peace has been made, because of what has passed between God and Christ. You must be sure of what God, and not Gideon, thought of the sacrifice. Such is the foundation of all Christian service — how much it has been forgotten! If we have not peace ourselves, how can we proclaim it to others?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

One writer turns this into a warning about service.

Whatever our own failure, Jesus is still the same, and the value of His work is unchanged. God never says to a soul, "Peace be to you. Do not fear," because of service. We are in danger of putting service in the place of the burnt offering.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The same words on the other side of the cross

The same answer of peace appears again later in Scripture.

Here we have the answer that produces peace, and, with peace, worship. It is the same with the risen Jesus. After suffering death, He reveals Himself to His disciples with the same words God uses here, and lays the foundation of the Church gathered together in worship. In Luke 7 we find the same experiences in the woman who was a sinner. She believed in the person of Jesus. His grace had made Him her all; but she did not yet know that someone like her was pardoned and saved, and might go in peace.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Emptied, then strengthened

This meeting left its mark on Gideon in two opposite ways.

It was a real revelation. It was enough to reduce him to nothing in himself, and it did. But it was also enough to strengthen him greatly in his walk among others who had not known the Lord in the same way. God may not use visions like this now, but it is always like this when He raises up a special instrument to deliver His people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Peace first, then work

Gideon takes God at His word and acts on it.

The very thing that put the sentence of death on his nature made Gideon strong. He builds an altar, trusting the word given him, and calls it Jehovah-shalom. So he lays hold of the word of peace and acts on it at once… There is no ground for deliverance in God's way. There is no proper basis for His intervention, except the removal of all barriers between God and our souls. This is the prime necessity — peace, then work; no service is safe until the person himself is settled and at peace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear. Gideon expects to die. He has seen the Angel of the Lord face to face, and God had said, "man shall not see me and live."

- Word. The terror does not fade on its own. God's spoken word of peace ends it.

- Ground. Peace came after the fire consumed the offering. It rests on the accepted sacrifice, never on the servant's work.

- Reach. The risen Christ greets His disciples with the same words, and a sinful woman in Luke 7 learned that someone like her could go in peace.

- Order. Peace first, then worship, then work: no service is safe until the servant himself is at rest before God.

Judges 6:24 · Darby

And Gideon built there an altar to Jehovah, and called it Jehovah-shalom. To this day it is yet in Ophrah of the Abi-ezrites.

Gideon has just met the angel of the LORD, feared he would die for it, and been told instead that peace was his. He does not march out against Midian. He builds. The name he gives the altar, "The LORD Is Peace," raises two questions: what peace does God give, and why would a man on the edge of war set it in stone?

The name on the altar

The name is not a report on Gideon's feelings. It is a statement about God Himself. One writer says the name says more than "we have peace with God" — and that such an altar leaves no room for Baal's.

Gideon, therefore, builds an altar, and calls it Jehovah-shalom — "Jehovah is peace." It is not just that there is peace with God. That would not even be the way to say it, since Jehovah is already the covenant name. No; Jehovah is peace. Peace is found in Him. He has produced it and given it. Whatever the fear, the soul takes shelter in Him. And since this is so, the altar itself is now a challenge to the idols. Jehovah's altar cannot stand beside Baal's, and Israel cannot be delivered with a divided faith.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The name is also an echo. Gideon took the very word God had spoken over him and wrote it above an altar.

A man who is humbled by the presence of God receives strength from God, if that presence is in blessing. Gideon recognises and lays hold of this for himself: Jehovah is with him in peace and in blessing. The word Shalom, translated "Peace be to you," is the same as that used in the name of the altar.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Peace that rests on a sacrifice

The altar follows an offering. In the verses just before, fire consumed it on a rock.

Then he built an altar and called it "Jehovah-shalom" — the LORD is peace. All is full of meaning. The offering he brought typifies Christ; so does the rock upon which it was brought. The fire consumed it all, carried it upward to God. And upon that the assurance of peace is given. Even so He is our peace... So we need not fear, for He has made peace through the blood of His cross, and He is our peace.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Worship before service

Gideon was called to fight. Yet his first act was to build a place of worship. Writers say that order still holds.

The immediate consequence in Gideon's case was — and this gives us a further qualification — that he became a worshipper. He worships God in the character in which He had revealed Himself — as Jehovah who had spoken peace to his soul. The sequence is very instructive. First peace, then worship. The lesson is that only those who have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ can worship... The true servant must first be a worshipper. To go out in service before we are worshippers is to go out knowing nothing of the character of the One we claim to serve.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Another writer applies the order to us.

The first result of what Gideon had just learned was not to press him into service, but to make him a worshipper. Christians today have completely lost sight of this fact... The believer should enter the presence of God as a worshipper before engaging in service.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Peace while the war is still coming

Nothing in Gideon's circumstances had changed when he named the altar. The fighting was still ahead of him.

Gideon does not seem to realise that he has been face to face with the angel of the LORD until He has departed. Then he is overwhelmed with the solemn fact, and dreads the consequences. But grace quickly reassures him, and he builds an altar to the LORD — Jehovah-Shalom, "Jehovah is Peace." Tumult raged all around him, and dreadful conflicts were soon to come. Yet there was one place where all was perfect peace, one Person with whom there was no conflict — Jehovah Himself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A man who felt his own weakness

Gideon knew his own weakness, and his people's.

He felt the ruin and the weakness of all around him. He felt the fallen and humiliating condition of his beloved people. He felt his own littleness, yes, his own emptiness and nothingness. How could he come forward? How could he strike the Midianites? How could he save Israel?

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Peace given. The name means Jehovah is peace — peace is found in Him, produced and given by Him, and the fearful soul shelters in Him.

- Peace grounded. It rests on the offering the fire consumed on the rock, a picture of Christ, who made peace by the blood of His cross.

- Peace worshipped. First peace, then worship: only those at peace with God can worship, and the altar came before the army.

- Peace held. With Midian still in the land and battle ahead, there was one Person with whom there was no conflict.

- Peace remembered. Gideon marked the spot, and the altar still stood at Ophrah — a fearful man's memorial to the word that stilled him.

Judges 6:25 · Darby

And it came to pass the same night, that Jehovah said to him, Take the young bullock, which thy father hath, even the second bullock of seven years old, and throw down the altar of Baal that thy father hath, and cut down the Asherah that is by it;

The word comes to Gideon on the same night he built his altar to the Lord. It sends him not against Midian but against his own father's household. Before he can face a nation's enemy, he must face the idol standing on his family's land.

Testimony that starts at home

The first thing God asks of Gideon is not public bravery but honesty at home:

Here we see that Gideon had to begin at home. God called him to raise the flag of testimony in the very heart of his family — in the very centre of his father's house. This is intensely interesting and deeply practical. Testimony must begin at home. It will never do to rush out into public work while our private and domestic ways are anything but what they ought to be. It is useless to set about throwing down the altar of Baal in public while the very same altar remains standing at home.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the Asherah was

The word translated "grove" in older Bibles does not mean a stand of trees. What people did to it shows what it was made of:

The word "grove" naturally suggests a row of trees. But that cannot be the meaning, since people set groves up "under every green tree." Manasseh put a carved image of the grove that he had made in the temple. Josiah later removed it, burnt it, and ground it to powder. That image was no doubt made of metal. But the groves were of wood, as we learn from the fact that people cut them down and burned them. One passage speaks of planting groves, another of making them, and another of building them. They always go together with idols and images.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

No room for two altars

Gideon had just built an altar to the Lord. That act itself made Baal's altar intolerable:

The altar itself is now a challenge to the idols. The Lord's altar cannot stay in the company of Baal's, and Israel cannot be delivered while its faith is divided. So on the same night — the night of the day when the Lord had appeared — the Lord told him to throw down Baal's altar and cut down the asherah. The asherah was a pillar of wood, the symbol of the Ashtaroth worship that went with Baal's. Then Gideon was to build an altar to the Lord on top of the stronghold where Israel used to retreat from the Midianites, and to offer on it his father's second bull, with the wood of the asherah he had cut down.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer ties the demand to Gideon's own name:

God will not share His glory with Baal. One altar or the other must be thrown down. Gideon is to make good his name, "the cutter down," and to show the vigour of his faith and the reality of his obedience.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Peace, then judgment

God's peace does not leave the idols standing:

There judgment begins. We must "cease to do evil" before we "learn to do good." The Lord comes to us as "the God of peace." Still the call is, "Down with the idols in your father's house." … And what is more, if God says, "Pull down the altar of Baal," He will give strength to do it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The idols as fuel

The wood of the felled image became the wood of the sacrifice:

The positive duty of anyone who would be a testimony for God is, before everything else, to cast down his idols. Why are there so few true servants among Christians, walking in the power of a testimony for Christ? It is because they have not the two altars. And why have they not the second? Because they have not provided themselves wood for the sacrifice. The idols are the wood. Let us overthrow them; let nothing of them remain. Let us begin in the innermost circle of the family. If we do not do this, where will our testimony be? The overthrowing of the idols is the secret of power. The Spirit of the Lord only came upon Gideon when he had done this. We do not now have Baals of stone and groves of wood, as he did, but we have many other idols. Unlike him, we often prefer them to the power of a faithful walk with God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Weak faith that still obeys

Obedience came, but not yet in daylight:

Gideon obeys, but he does it by night, fearing to do it by day. Here nature breaks in. His faith was not yet strong enough to let him testify openly and boldly; but what his faith did enable him to do, that he did.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Home first. God sends Gideon against the idol on his father's land before He sends him against Midian.

- Judgment first. God greets Gideon in peace, then tells him to pull the idols down. We must stop doing evil before we learn to do good.

- One altar. God will not share His glory with Baal, so one altar or the other must fall. Divided faith never wins a deliverance.

- Fuel. The wood of the felled image feeds the fire of the new sacrifice. The idols supply what worship burns.

- Then power. The Spirit came on Gideon only after the idols came down. What God commands, He gives strength to do — even to a man who can only manage it at night.

Judges 6:26 · Darby

and build an altar to Jehovah thy God upon the top of this strong place in the ordered manner, and take the second bullock, and offer up a burnt-offering with the wood of the Asherah that thou shalt cut down.

Gideon has just met God and built an altar called "The LORD is Peace." That same night God tells him to tear down his father's altar to Baal and raise the LORD's altar in its place, with the idol for firewood.

Begin at Home

God does not send Gideon against the raiders from Midian first. He sends him against the altar in his own yard.

Here we see that Gideon had to begin at home. He was called to unfurl the banner of testimony in the very heart of his family — in the very centre of his father's house... Testimony must begin at home. It will never do to rush out into public work while our private and family ways are anything but what they ought to be. It is useless to set about throwing down the altar of Baal in public, while that same altar remains standing at home.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer asks how far one man's obedience has to reach.

Does he worship and obey God for himself? Then that same obedience must be claimed for the whole circle of his responsibilities. Is a man going to be a deliverer for all Israel, while his own family is in bondage?... How many are tempted to invert this order. They may be jealous enough for God's altar for all Israel, and yet have never set it up in their own homes.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One Altar or the Other

The verse does not ask Gideon to add the LORD's altar alongside Baal's. Tearing down the one and building the other is a single command.

He is to cast down his father's altar of Baal, cut down the wooden image, or column, and offer a bull on an altar to the LORD. After all, this is only the natural enlargement of the worship he had just enjoyed. God will not share His glory with Baal. One altar or the other must be thrown down. Gideon is to make good his name, "the cutter down," and to show the vigour of his faith and the reality of his obedience.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Idol Becomes the Fuel

The offering must burn on wood cut from the Asherah — the wooden column beside Baal's altar. Nothing of the false worship survives it.

The positive duty of anyone who would be a testimony for God is, before anything else, to cast down his idols. Why are there so few true servants among Christians, walking in the power of a testimony for Christ? It is because they have not the two altars. And why do they not have the second? Because they have not provided themselves with wood for the sacrifice. The idols are the wood (v. 26). Let us overthrow them, and let nothing of them remain. Let us begin in the innermost circle of the family... The overthrowing of the idols is the secret of power; the Spirit of the LORD only came upon Gideon when he had done this.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"In the Ordered Place"

God fixes the altar's shape and site, not Gideon. The ESV has the stones "laid in due order"; other translations read "in the ordered place." Writers take that phrase as the end of self-chosen worship.

It is of the essence of self-will to say, "I have a right to worship God how I like." Obedience to God is the saint's rule and liberty. No power in the world has any right to interfere with this. And what is more, if God says, "Pull down the altar of Baal," He will give strength to do it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

But Israel's own altar stood at the tabernacle in Shiloh. So how could a new altar on this rock be right? One writer answers that God's command alone settled it.

Gideon worshipped according to a new revelation of God, despite Shiloh and the tabernacle. His rock became the ordered place, or the anointed altar, only because of this revelation and command of God.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Obedience Before Strength

So Gideon obeyed. One writer points out what had to come first, and what could only come after.

Gideon was associated with evil in his father's house. As another has said, "faithfulness within comes before outward strength: evil must be put away from Israel before the enemy can be driven out. Obedience first, and then strength: this is God's order."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What if courage falls short of open testimony?

Though the flesh may hinder testimony, it cannot prevent obedience, if there is faith... The stirrings of the flesh are no excuse for failing to obey what we have faith to do. So it was with Gideon. From the start he learned how hostile his own people were to faithfulness for the truth. The world does not realise that its opposition always draws out of God's witness more than enough power to crush it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Home first. The altar you tear down in public is worthless while the same altar stands in your own house.

- One altar. God will not share His glory; Baal's altar must come down for His to go up.

- Idols as fuel. The wood of the cut-down image feeds the fire — the thing removed becomes the means of worship.

- God's order. God fixed the place. Obedience, not preference, is the believer's rule and freedom.

- Then power. Obedience first, strength second — the Spirit came on Gideon only after the idol fell.

Judges 6:27 · Darby

And Gideon took ten men of his servants, and did as Jehovah had said to him. And it came to pass, because he feared his father's house, and the men of the city, if he did it by day, that he did it by night.

Gideon's first task is not to fight Midian but to tear down the altar in his own family's yard. He does it at night, with ten servants, because he is afraid — so does obedience mixed with fear still count as obedience?

Obedience Before Strength

God's first order sent Gideon against the altar in his own home, not against the enemy camp.

Now the Lord calls Gideon to act; but he must first begin at home… Here we get obedience. Gideon was linked with evil in his father's house. As someone else has said, "faithfulness at home comes before strength outside: evil must go from Israel before the enemy can be driven out. Obedience first, and then strength: this is God's order."… So with Gideon: God could not send him to strike the Midianites until he had pulled down the idol in his father's house… Satan is helpless in the presence of an obedient man. The devil resisted in obedience is the devil defeated.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Fear That Did Not Stop The Work

Gideon was afraid, and he obeyed anyway. One writer calls that the real meaning of courage.

Gideon obeyed, taking ten men who were his servants to do this serious work. They did it at night, because Gideon feared what the men of the city would think. There was timidity in his faith, but faith still acted. True courage does not mean having no fear. It shows itself in doing right despite fear.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Doing Right Quietly, Speaking Up Later

Obeying God and speaking out about it are not the same thing. One can fall short while the other goes ahead.

Even where a person receives and obeys the word of God, the testimony often falls short. Many a true soul is not ready to speak out as openly as he might. It is better when obedience and testimony go together. The flesh may hold back testimony, but it cannot stop obedience, if there is faith… The feelings of the flesh are no excuse for not obeying what we have faith to do. Because of them we may give up the higher place of testimony, but nothing must stop obedience to God's word.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Nothing Left Standing

What Gideon did in the dark was no token gesture.

This is what we may call striking at the very root of the matter. The worship of Baal is completely overturned. This was no small thing. We have little idea what it cost the son of Joash to do this; but by the grace of God, he did it. True, it may have been with fear and trembling — still he did it… No half measures would have worked. There was no use picking a stone out of the idol's altar here and there. The whole structure had to come down from its very foundation.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Idols Pulled Down In The Dark

God never told Gideon to do the work in daylight. He knew the man He had called.

Gideon obeyed at once, without compromise or holding back. For him the idols were nothing compared with the God he knew. This "mighty man of valour" had been short of courage. Fear of the enemy (v. 11), fear of God (v. 23), fear of his father's house (v. 27) were some of his marks. He did his work at night, afraid to do it by day. He still did it, because God had commanded him. Only in the morning did the people of the city see what had been done. The One who knew Gideon's character had not told him: Do this work by day. Let us too, weak as we are, destroy our idols quietly, when no eye is watching… The world will soon see that we have a new altar it does not know, and that the grove is worth nothing to us except as wood to burn.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

When Morning Comes

Gideon still had to face the morning. One writer turns that wait into a question for the reader.

We can imagine how anxiously Gideon may have waited for the next day. Or how calmly, if he simply had God before him… Has anyone been trembling and hesitating to take some plain step of faith? Let them learn from Gideon, and take courage. The consequences you dread would fail to happen. The very people whose opposition you fear will approve.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Home first. Evil had to go from his father's house before God could send him against Midian — obedience first, then strength.

- Night still counts. Fear may hold back your testimony, but it cannot stop obedience, if there is faith.

- Fear obeyed. Courage is not the absence of fear; it is acting rightly while afraid.

- Half measures fail. The whole structure came down, not a stone here and there.

- Morning vindicates. The consequences he dreaded did not come; the very people he feared came round.

Judges 6:28 · Darby

And when the men of the city arose early in the morning, behold, the altar of Baal was broken down, and the Asherah was cut down that was by it, and the second bullock was offered up upon the altar that was built.

The town wakes to a scene it cannot explain away. The altar it had prayed at is rubble, the wooden pole beside it is gone, and a bull has been offered on a new altar built to the God of Israel. What Gideon did in the dark is now the first thing every man in the town sees. A private act of obedience has become public testimony.

Night work, morning light

Gideon did the work after dark because he was afraid. The timing changed nothing about the result. By morning the deed stood in full daylight for the whole town to see.

He did his work at night, because he was afraid to do it by day. He did it all the same, for God had commanded him to. Only in the morning did the people of the city see what he had done... Let us, too, weak as we are, destroy our idols in silence, when no one is watching. Let us not talk loudly about it. Let us do this hard work with fear and trembling, looking to God alone, in the silence of the night. The world will soon see that we have a new altar which it does not know.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Why it started in his father's house

The altar Gideon pulled down belonged to his own family, not to some stranger's town. One writer finds God's order in that.

Faithfulness within comes before outward strength: Israel must put away evil before driving out the enemy. Obedience first, and then strength: this is God's order.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer weighs what the night cost Gideon, and why the idol at home could not be left standing.

Gideon had nothing but death to expect, if it had not been the will of the Lord; but, come what may, "whoever does the will of God abides forever," and Gideon was content to face whatever followed... It would have been a huge inconsistency for a man to go out and deal with the pagan enemies of Israel while his own father's house worshipped Baal... For nothing wounds people more than something that treats their religion as nothing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Nothing left standing

The men of the town found the altar broken down — not damaged, not half taken apart. That thoroughness is the point.

This is what we may call striking at the very root of the matter. The worship of Baal is completely overturned... There would have been no use in picking out a stone here and there from the idol's altar. The whole structure had to be torn down from its very foundation, and the idol itself shamed in front of the very worshippers it had deceived.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The wooden pole beside the altar came down too. The ESV calls it the Asherah; some older translations call it "the grove." One writer notes what God's altar does without:

The grove might add beauty to the altar of Baal, but God's altar must be set up in its own plain simplicity.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Two altars, and the wood between them

The town saw more than an absence. It saw a replacement — a new altar, fuelled by the idol that came down.

The positive duty of one who would be a testimony for God is, before all else, to cast down his idols. Why is it that there are so few true servants among Christians, walking in the power of a testimony for Christ? It is because they have not the two altars. And why have they not the second? Because they have not provided themselves wood for the sacrifice. The idols are the wood... Let us begin in the innermost circle of the family. If we do not do this, where will our testimony be?

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The uproar that follows

The town's outrage is not a sign that Gideon got it wrong. It shows where the town had been resting its confidence.

The action of faith always stirs up the flesh. Israel did not know where their strength was; they thought it was in Baal. Gideon had learned that it was in God. These are testing times... How many think the strength of Christians lies in the things they see around them! The soul taught by God knows it is only in Jehovah Jesus.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

For anyone hesitating

Gideon's dreaded morning came, and the disaster he feared did not.

Is anyone trembling and hesitating to take some plain step of faith? Let them learn from Gideon, and take courage. How all the results you dread would fail to happen! The very people whose opposition you fear will approve. Or if not, what can happen?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Home first. Pull down the idol in your own family before you face the enemy outside — obedience, then strength.

- All the way down. Not a stone picked out here and there. The whole structure comes down, and the pole beside it too.

- Replaced, not just removed. The morning shows two things — an altar gone and an altar built, the old idol burned as fuel for the new sacrifice.

- Daylight comes. Quiet work, done in fear, still ends up in plain view. The world soon notices the new altar it does not recognise.

- Then the noise. Opposition shows that faith has touched what people trusted in. The disaster you dread usually never comes.

Judges 6:29 · Darby

And they said one to another, Who has done this thing? And when they inquired and asked, they said, Gideon the son of Joash has done this thing.

Gideon tore down Baal's altar at night. By morning the whole town stood in front of the ruins, asking who did it. The search that follows raises two questions commentators keep coming back to: why God asked for this act first, and what happens when quiet obedience is found out.

Faithfulness Starts at Home

God sent Gideon against the idol in his own father's yard before He sent him against Israel's enemies. The town even names him by his father: Gideon the son of Joash. Commentators see a fixed order here.

Gideon was tied to evil in his father's house. As someone else has said, "faithfulness at home comes before strength outside: evil must be put out of Israel before the enemy can be driven out. Obedience first, and then strength: this is God's order." … So it was with Gideon. Until he had pulled the idol down in his father's house, God could not send him to strike the Midianites. There is plenty here to make all of us search our own hearts. How often have we grieved over our lack of power in the Lord's service, when we could have traced the cause to some lack of obedience?

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Nothing Left to Argue With

The townsmen woke to an obvious ruin because Gideon left nothing standing. A half-done job would have been useless.

We have little idea what it cost the son of Joash to do this. But by the grace of God, he did it. True, he may have done it with fear and trembling, but he still did it. He struck one strong blow at the whole system of Baal, and it crumbled to dust under his feet. Half measures would have been no use. Picking out a stone here and there from the idol's altar would have achieved nothing. The whole structure had to come down from its very foundation.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Afraid, and Obedient Anyway

Gideon worked after dark because he feared these very men. His fear did not cancel his obedience.

His faith was timid, but faith still acted. True courage does not mean having no fear. It shows itself in doing right despite fear.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Deed Speaks for the Man

Gideon never announced what he had done. The city found him by asking around, because the act spoke for him.

It is better when obedience and testimony go together. But though the flesh may hold back our testimony, it cannot stop obedience, if there is faith… The stirrings of the flesh are no excuse for not obeying what we have faith to do… And if we are faithful, even without strong feeling, our acts will speak for themselves. So testimony will follow, even though it did not go with them. That is what happened with Gideon.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

From Hidden to Hated

Once his name was spoken, his private obedience became public. It cost him, and it gave him a new name.

Only in the morning did the people of the city see what he had done… Let us, too, weak as we are, destroy our idols in silence, when no eye is watching us… The world will soon see that we have a new altar it does not know, and that the grove is worth nothing to us except as wood to burn. Then the world, which has supported us until now, will hate us. It was the altar of testimony that drew everyone's hatred onto Gideon. Hated — but what did it matter? He was given the name Jerubbaal (let Baal plead), and in front of everyone he became the living witness that the things he had once worshipped were worthless.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the Town Was Furious

The men asking this question were Israelites, not foreigners. One writer sees their anger as a pattern, not a one-off.

The action of faith always stirs up the flesh. Israel did not know where their strength was; they thought it was in Baal. Gideon had learned it was in God. These are sifting times. In the Lord's day everything looked to be in beautiful order. But because He was setting aside men's traditions, everyone was against Him. It is the same now. How many people think the strength of Christians lies in the things they see around them! The soul taught by God knows it is only in Jehovah Jesus.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The crowd's question ended in a demand for Gideon's death. One writer notes who answered it.

And from the start, he learns how hostile his own people are to faithfulness for the truth. But how little the world knows that its evil opposition always draws out of God's witness more power than enough to put it down! The people's cry for Gideon's execution is met by Joash's challenge to let Baal plead for himself, if he is a god.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Home first. Gideon had to clear the evil out of his own home before God could send him against the enemy outside. Obedience first, then strength.

- Whole, not partial. Gideon pulled the altar down from its foundation. Half measures would have been useless, and would have left nothing for the city to find.

- Fear allowed, disobedience not. Gideon worked at night because he was afraid. Courage is doing right despite fear, not the absence of fear.

- Acts declare themselves. He said nothing, yet the search found him out. When testimony does not go with obedience, it follows after it.

- Discovery costs. Once named, Gideon faced the town's hatred and a call for his death. It made him a public witness that his old god was worthless.

Judges 6:30 · Darby

And the men of the city said to Joash, Bring out thy son, that he may die, because he has broken down the altar of Baal, and because he has cut down the Asherah that was by it.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 6:31 · Darby

And Joash said to all that stood near him, Will *ye* contend for Baal? or will *ye* save him? he that contends for him, let him be put to death whilst it is yet morning. If he be a god, let him plead for himself, because they have broken down his altar.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 6:32 · Darby

And on that day they called him Jerubbaal, saying, Let Baal plead with him, because he has broken down his altar.

Gideon had pulled down the altar of Baal in his own father's yard, and the men of the town came for his life. His father's reply turned the trial around. The nickname it produced — Jerubbaal, "let Baal contend against him" — stuck to Gideon for life. It was a standing dare to the idol he had insulted.

The Name as an Argument

The name puts the burden of proof where it belongs. A god who cannot defend his own altar has already lost the case. Older translations word it "Let Baal plead against him," and the writers quoted here follow that wording.

This was very simple reasoning: "If he is a god, let him plead for himself." Gideon's decided course had brought matters to a point. Baal was either a reality or a most complete delusion. If the former, let him plead for himself. If the latter, who would think of pleading for him? Nothing could be simpler. Gideon's action was a complete success. The worship of Baal was overturned, and the worship of Jehovah Elohim set up instead.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Why the Case Was Never Debated

Joash never weighed the pros and cons of Baal worship. One writer turns that refusal on anyone tempted to argue a case for evil.

It was of no use to argue the case, except to show the people the folly of pleading for Baal. If the things set aside were Baal's, and if Baal was a god, surely he would arise and take their part. It was of no use to debate. And do not let us suppose that all the arguments of all the good men in the world can make that which is evil, good. It is sad indeed to see the arguments that are devised by the wit of men in defence of evil. The binding duty of the saint is to separate from evil, however much long tradition or anything else supports it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Home Before the Battlefield

The altar Gideon smashed stood on his own family's land. God told him to pull it down before he went out against Israel's enemies.

The will of Jehovah was explicitly declared to Gideon. Apart from the will of the Lord, he had nothing but death to expect. But come what may, "he who does the will of God abides forever," and Gideon was content to accept all the consequences… It would have been a glaring inconsistency for a man to go out against the pagan enemies of Israel while Baal was worshipped in his own father's house.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Writers draw the same order out of the story as a general rule for service.

As another has remarked, "Faithfulness within precedes outward strength. Evil must be put away from Israel before the enemy can be driven out. Obedience first and then strength. This is God's order."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Boldness That Spreads

Joash had owned that altar. Now the man who kept the idol takes his son's side.

Not to be interrupted by the unbelief of those around, he did it by night, and the next morning the challenge to Baal was plain for all to see. So Gideon had to "add virtue" to his faith — the boldness needed by every good soldier of Christ. This boldness is God's means to awaken and embolden others, so that Joash, his father, steps into the ranks.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer traces the same cause and effect back to how far Gideon went:

There is nothing, we repeat, like plain decision — bold, uncompromising faithfulness for Christ, whatever it costs. Had Gideon been less decided, had his line of action been less thorough, his father Joash would not have been so completely won over. It needed just such a way of dealing with Baal to convince a reasonable person that the worship of such a god was a sham and a falsehood.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not a Shield

The new name looks like protection: the crowd goes home and Gideon lives. It did the opposite.

The name "Jerubbaal" was no defence. On the contrary, it brought up the question whether there was power in Satan now that faith was in exercise.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

One writer traces Joash's answer through to the title it gave Gideon.

He answers that the man who pleads for Baal deserves death: it is for Baal himself to avenge the insult. The sarcasm knocks the opposition down at once, and leaves Gideon with the title of idol-challenger, "Let Baal contend!" In the fight that is beginning, the very existence of the man of faith is a sign of victory already won, a pledge of one to come.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The Name in Later Scripture

Later Scripture found the word "Baal" too shameful to keep and swapped it for a word meaning shame.

Ishbosheth means "man of shame"… We know from Chronicles (1 Chron. 8:33) that his original name was Esh-baal. The same change happened to Jerubbaal, turned into Jerubbesheth (2 Sam. 11:21). In Hosea 9:10 Baal himself is called "that shame." It is hard to doubt that people made these substitutions because they felt how shameful idolatry was.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Obedience first. Gideon had to clear evil out of his own home before God would send him against Israel's enemies — "obedience first and then strength."

- No debate. Joash refused to argue the merits of Baal; no amount of clever reasoning can make an evil thing good.

- A plain dare. "Let Baal contend against him" — the name forces the idol either to act or stand exposed as nothing.

- Courage spreads. Gideon's boldness brought the very father who had owned the altar into the ranks. Boldness is God's way of stirring up others.

- A banner, not a shelter. Jerubbaal gave Gideon no protection. It raised the question whether Satan still had power where faith was at work.

Judges 6:33 · Darby

And all Midian and Amalek and the children of the east were gathered together, and went over, and encamped in the valley of Jezreel.

Gideon has just pulled down his father's altar to Baal. The answer comes fast. The whole eastern coalition crosses the Jordan and camps in Israel's richest plain. Why does the storm break just when a man starts to obey? And what does God do with a valley full of enemies?

The price of peace with the world

Commentators read the timing as no accident. As long as Israel put up with Baal, Midian stayed away. The trouble starts when the compromise ends.

When we mix with the world, Satan has no reason to disturb us. Let him be alarmed, and up come Midianites, Amalekites, and the rest.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

These enemies are also read as a picture of what a believer fights inside. Amalek stands for the flesh.

The Midianites, with their allies the Amalekites (a figure of the flesh), came out to fight against Gideon. This was natural, and it is so today. You may be sure of this. If your heart is drawn heavenward, you will have to fight these combined powers. The flesh does not love the things of Christ. It finds its satisfaction in the things of earth.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Two kinds of opposition

Gideon had already faced hostility from his own townspeople over the altar. That anger was held back; this army was not.

At first Gideon met hostility from those who bore the name of the people of God. For a time, the sincerity of his testimony held that hostility in check. Midian and Amalek (v. 33), however, were not held back in that way. The men of the city, in their folly, tried to hinder their own deliverance. The world, for its part, made a determined effort to crush the revival that was to free Israel from bondage.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The ground they chose

They camped on the standing battlefield of the land. Its history runs from Israel's early victories to the last battle of prophecy.

The wide valley or plain around Jezreel, in southern Galilee. It has been called the battlefield of Palestine. Barak won there, and Josiah was defeated there (Judges 5:19; 2 Chronicles 35:22). Megiddo is in the same area. It is also perhaps the place where the great battle of Armageddon will be fought, Revelation 16:16. It is a very fertile plain.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

God's timing, not Midian's

The order of the record matters. The army gathers only after God has finished preparing His man. The gathering serves God's purpose, not Midian's.

Gideon is now a vessel set apart and fit for the Master's use. So we get the crowning qualification of power… Satan can never get ahead of God. While God is preparing Gideon, the Midianites and the rest stay still; when Gideon is ready, God gathers them together for destruction. They marshal their forces to destroy Israel; but the Spirit of the Lord comes upon Gideon, and now it is God Himself against the Midianites.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Size of the threat, measure of the help

A huge enemy camp can be read the other way round. Its size measures the power that is coming to silence it.

God's purpose is to assure the soul of this. Christ has triumphed over every power of evil. Just as surely, every display of evil is a guarantee to us that a far greater power is close at hand. And further, the greater the evil opposition, the plainer the power that overcomes and silences it. In every circumstance of life we should comfort ourselves with this: "when the enemy comes in like a flood, the Spirit of the Lord raises up a standard against him."

The Bible Treasury (the writer quotes Isaiah 59:19 in an older translation)

Darby marks the same moment as a change of stage in the story:

The Midianites come up against Israel. All is ready for the Lord's intervention… This is a new phase in the history; not only faithfulness, but power.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Order of battle

The altar came before the army. Writers press this as the rule, not the exception.

Again let us note, faithfulness does not begin with the Midianites; it begins at home. This is a great principle, whether for an individual soul or for the Church of God. Gideon must attack the evil inside his father's house, and in Israel itself. Only then does the Lord use him to save Israel out of the hands of the Midianites.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Darby ties the Spirit's power to that same faith:

The Midianites come up against Israel. All is ready for the Lord's intervention… The power of the Spirit, which sways the minds of men, is with the faith that acknowledges God, that acknowledges Him in His relationship to His people, and faithfully puts away the evil that does not fit that relationship.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Home first — the altar in his father's house had to fall before the army in the valley could. Usefulness for God starts where you already live.

- Then hostility — an untroubled life can mean an undisturbed enemy. Opposition comes when compromise goes, from religious neighbours and open enemies alike.

- Then the gathering — the enemy musters only when God's man is ready. What looks like Israel's ruin is the enemy collected for destruction.

- Then the power — the size of the camp in Jezreel measures the help. The greater the flood, the plainer the standard God raises.

- Then the victory — the fight is no longer Gideon against Midian. It is God Himself against Midian, on the field where Israel has always fought.

Judges 6:34 · Darby

And the Spirit of Jehovah came upon Gideon, and he blew the trumpet, and the Abi-ezrites were gathered after him.

Midian and its allies have camped in the Valley of Jezreel, and Israel's answer is one man who had been threshing wheat in hiding. What changes him is not new courage but the Spirit of the LORD taking hold of him.

Obedience Before Power

The order of events matters. Gideon had already destroyed the idols at home before any power came on him.

The overthrowing of the idols is the secret of power; the Spirit of the LORD only came upon Gideon when he had done this. We do not have, as he did, Baals of stone and groves of wood. But we have many other idols, and, unlike him, we often prefer them to the power of a faithful walk with God.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer brings this into daily life.

Unqualified obedience to the word of God is the path of power. At certain periods of our lives power has marked our service, at other times it has been missing. Let us then ask ourselves whether we have rebuilt some idol we had destroyed. All public service for the Christian must begin with faithfulness in the small circle where he is called to live.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What "Clothed" Means

The wording here is unusual, and one writer explains it by reversing the picture we expect.

In the case of three men (Gideon, for instance: Judges 6:34) the expression is a peculiar one. It means that the Spirit of the Lord clothed Himself with the man. He took full possession of him for a purpose, and until that purpose was achieved.

Modernised from Other AuthorsOriginal wording

Gideon was not the only man used this way.

There were others like Gideon, Amasai and Zechariah, with whom the Spirit clothed Himself for the time being, so that He might witness through them… But in all these cases the Spirit acted upon men from the outside. He used men for His purpose without reference to their inward moral character.

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

From Hiding to Trumpet

Compare what Gideon's hands were doing before with what his lips do now.

The Spirit of the LORD comes upon Gideon, and he blew a trumpet. This is the same Gideon who was threshing wheat to hide it from the Midianites. Now he puts a trumpet to his lips and sounds out defiance in the face of the enemy. In the same way, Peter had trembled before a servant girl. Once the Spirit clothed him with power, he charged the rulers with the sin of crucifying Christ. The apostles too, being filled with the Holy Spirit, spoke the word of God with boldness (Acts 4:31).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Trumpet Gathers

The first thing the Spirit's power produces is not an attack but a gathering. Trumpets in Israel had a set list of uses.

They were the voice of God, telling the people His mind on four important occasions. They gave the signal for gathering the people together; for the moving of the camps; for battle; and also for the solemn feasts, or worship… Gideon began where God begins (Num. 10). "He sounded the trumpet, and the Abiezrites were called out to follow him." He carried the voice of God, gathering Israel together again after their own failure had scattered them.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Enemies Turned Followers

Abiezer was Gideon's own clan — the very men who had just called for his death. Their change of mind is part of the miracle.

The Spirit of God equips him for special work. In response the men of Abiezer, who had demanded his death not long before, join his standard, and so do Manasseh, Asher and Zebulun. Truly, when the enemy comes in like a flood, the Spirit of God lifts up a standard against him. Let there be the first work of God in a soul, and he will find that others long for freedom from bondage too. They will follow his lead, as he follows Christ.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God's Timing

The armies gather at the exact moment the man is ready.

Satan can never get ahead of God. While Gideon is being prepared, the Midianites and the others stay still. When Gideon is ready, God gathers them together for destruction. They line up their forces to destroy Israel. But the Spirit of the LORD comes upon Gideon, and now it is God Himself against the Midianites. Let us make sure we never move forward against the enemy except in the power of the Spirit of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Altar first. The idol at home came down before the Spirit came on Gideon. Obedience in the small circle opens the door to power in the large one.

- Clothed. The wording means the Spirit clothed Himself with Gideon. He took full possession of him for a purpose, until that purpose was done.

- From outside. In the Old Testament the Spirit acted on such men from the outside, for a time. Their inward moral character had nothing to do with it.

- Trumpet. The first act of that power was not a blow struck but a call sounded — the voice of God gathering a scattered people.

- Standard. The clan that had demanded his death now follows him. When the enemy comes in like a flood, the Spirit lifts up a standard — and it is God Himself against Midian.

Judges 6:35 · Darby

And he sent messengers throughout Manasseh, and they also were gathered after him; and he sent messengers to Asher, and to Zebulun, and to Naphtali; and they came up to meet them.

Gideon has just pulled down Baal's altar in his own father's yard. Now the Spirit of the Lord is on him, he blows a trumpet, and four tribes leave home to follow a man who had been threshing wheat in hiding.

Baal Down Before the Trumpet Up

Gideon could not have rallied Israel against Midian while an idol still stood at home.

Here is Gideon with his own people against him, and the enemies of Israel gathered and camped in Jezreel. But he has peace with God, and the Lord is (so to speak) bound to appear on his side. How does he act? The Spirit of the Lord comes upon him, and he blows the trumpet. Had Gideon been serving Baal, he could not have blown the trumpet like this. But Baal is down, and the altar of God is set up in the ordered place. He sends messengers throughout all Manasseh, and they gather to him too, along with Asher, Zebulun, and Naphtali. All these gather around the man who is least in his father's house, the poorest of the tribe of Manasseh — the man to whom the Lord has said, "Go in this your might."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why Men Came

The men of his own clan had recently wanted him dead for what he did to their altar. The Spirit changed their minds, not Gideon's persuasion.

Everything is ready for the Lord's intervention. The Spirit of the Lord comes upon Gideon. This is a new phase in the history; not only faithfulness, but power. Gideon blows the trumpet, and those who shortly before would have killed him now follow in his train. He sends messengers to all his tribe, and Zebulun, Asher, and Naphtali come up too. The Spirit's power sways the minds of men. It goes with the faith that acknowledges God, and acknowledges Him in His relationship to His people. That faith is faithful to put away the evil that cannot stand with that relationship.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Trumpet Was for Gathering

Israel's trumpets had fixed uses, laid down in the law long before Gideon picked one up. Gideon's first act with the Spirit's power was not an attack but a summons.

We find the use of the trumpets detailed in Numbers 10:1-10. They were the voice of God, telling His mind to the people on four important occasions. They gave the signal to gather the people together. They gave the signal for the camps to move, for battle, and for the solemn feasts or worship... Most of God's children think that Christianity is only about taking the gospel to people who don't believe. Gideon understood the testimony of faith in another way. He began where God begins. "He blew the trumpet, and Abiezer was gathered after him." He carried God's voice, calling Israel together again after their own failure had scattered them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

One Man's Obedience Spreading Outward

The response was not a handful of volunteers. It was a whole country waking up.

In short, there was a thorough awakening. The tide of spiritual energy rose high and carried hundreds and thousands along with it. The work that had begun in Gideon's heart was spreading far and wide, across the whole land. The Spirit of the Lord was displaying His mighty energy, stirring up multitudes to gather round the standard that the hand of faith had raised.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Four Names

Some writers find a lesson in the names of the tribes that answered.

The Spirit of the Lord now clothes Gideon. No mere human wisdom or strength is enough in this fight. We are safe only when we depend on Him. He blows the trumpet, and Abiezer, then all Manasseh, gather behind him. Manasseh's fitness for this place is plain in Gideon, himself a Manassite. The world can only be overcome by the man whose goal lies beyond it, and this is what Manasseh represents. Then Asher, the "happy," Zebulun, the "dweller in relationship," and Naphtali, the "struggler" who overcomes, follow after Manasseh. So Israel's army of victory comes together.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Old Names, Same Loyalty

Two of these tribes had answered a call like this once before, in the days of Deborah and Barak.

We are very glad to see our friends Zebulun and Naphtali here again. They stood out in the revival in Deborah's and Barak's day. They risked their lives in the high places, ready to die to defend what belonged to God. Here they are in the front line again. This is a very fine thing to see — consistency in the desire to maintain what belongs to the Lord. Now this trumpet call led to this army of 32,000 that was going to meet the Midianites.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Summary

- Cleared — the idol came down at home before the trumpet went up in public. Peace with God came first; the call to others came second.

- Clothed — the Spirit came on Gideon, and the same neighbours who had wanted him dead now marched behind him. The power that sways men's minds is the Spirit's, and it goes with faith that puts evil away.

- Called — God gave the trumpet first to gather scattered people, not to start a fight. Gideon began where God begins.

- Carried — a work begun in one hidden heart spread through the whole land. Thousands rallied to a standard that faith had raised.

- Consistent — Zebulun and Naphtali had answered such a call before, and they answered again. This trumpet call raised an army of 32,000 to meet Midian.

Judges 6:36 · Darby

And Gideon said to God, If thou wilt save Israel by my hand, as thou hast said,

Gideon has sounded the trumpet and gathered the tribes. Yet before he marches he goes back to God for proof. He asks God to soak a fleece of wool on the threshing floor with dew while the ground around it stays dry. Two questions follow. Was this faith or unbelief? And what did the wet fleece and dry ground mean?

An "if" laid in front of God's promise

God had already told Gideon that He would use him. The words "as you have said" show Gideon knew it. That is why writers treat the opening "if" as a step backwards.

Perhaps his spirit was overawed when he saw the huge pagan army massing in front of him. For a moment his courage failed, and his heart longed for a fresh sign from the Lord. "Then Gideon said to God, If You will save Israel by my hand, as You have said" — alas, the poor heart can place its unbelieving "if" right in front of the word of God who cannot lie.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Other writers judge the same act more kindly. Gideon wants a sign he can see, and God met that same desire in others without complaint.

The boldness of faith, even when it seems to need confirmatory signs, never offends our gracious God. When He promised all blessing to Abraham, and that he would inherit the land of Canaan, Abraham asks, "How am I to know that I shall possess it?" Is God offended that His word is not enough? Ah, no, but He gives the wonderful night vision of the furnace and the flaming torch.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how much blame Gideon deserves. None of them says God withheld the answer.

God gives more than Gideon asked for

What Gideon gets back is not correction but kindness.

But oh, the matchless grace of God! His love that never reproaches! His tender thoughtfulness! He graciously meets the weakness of His poor servant... What condescending grace! Instead of harshly rebuking Gideon's unbelieving "if," He confirms his wavering faith with evidence beyond measure.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the fleece and the dew stand for

Writers also read the picture as a map of God's dealings with His people. The wool sits in the middle of the open floor, just as one nation sits among many.

The fleece in the middle of the ground is the type of Israel in the middle of the nations. The dew is the symbol of divine grace and mercy. It is the Lord who forsakes and who refreshes Israel. Israel today is like the fleece without the dew, while the ground, the Gentiles, have the grace of God. But before long the dew will fall upon Israel again and the time of their blessing and fullness will come.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

On the second night the fleece stayed dry and the floor was wet. Writers read that sign the same way, but for a different time.

When the dew is seen upon the floor and not the fleece, it suggests the blessing that has come to the Gentiles during the period of Israel's rejection. We might say the present time.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A foreshadowing of Christ

One writer sees the wet fleece on dry ground as a portrait of one Man in a world that had nothing for God.

In Himself He was always that. In God's eyes He was beautiful beyond compare, and every thought, word and action was completely delightful to His Father. He was indeed like the fleece wet with the dew of heaven, in the middle of the barren dryness — the moral desert of Sahara — that ruled on every side.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Another writer turns the picture into a prayer for ourselves: to carry a character the world cannot produce.

Are we prepared to say to God, "Let the dew be upon the fleece; let us be saturated, baptised, entirely marked by what the earth does not have"? That is Christ. Only as our hearts and minds feed on Him will we bear the heavenly character and stand out from what belongs to the earth.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Should we put out a fleece?

Many treat this chapter as permission to ask God for a visible sign before making a decision. One writer answers that.

But let believers remember that the Spirit of God lives in us. We can depend on God's Word together with the leading of the Spirit. So we need no confirming signs — only real communion with the Lord and faith in His Word.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Dew asked. Gideon puts an "if" in front of a promise God had already spoken. The heart wants something it can see, not just God's bare word.

- Dew given. God does not rebuke the "if". He answers it twice, giving weak faith more evidence than Gideon asked for.

- Dew on the fleece. Wet wool on a dry floor pictures grace and mercy resting on Israel among the nations.

- Dew on the ground. The reversed sign pictures blessing reaching the nations while Israel is set aside. That is the present time. Israel's refreshing is still to come.

- Dew in us. Christ is the true fleece, wet with heaven in a dry world. Believers now have the Spirit and the Word. So the call is to soak in Him, not to look for signs.

Judges 6:37 · Darby

behold, I put a fleece of wool on the threshing-floor; if dew shall be on the fleece only, and it be dry upon all the ground, then shall I know that thou wilt save Israel by my hand, as thou hast said.

The armies of Midian are camped in the valley, and Gideon is about to lead Israel out against them. First he asks God for a sign overnight: wool laid on the threshing floor, wet with dew while the ground around it stays dry.

A servant who wanted more than a promise

God had already promised to save Israel by Gideon's hand. So his "if" stands in front of a word that needed no proving. One writer sees here the instinct of every human heart:

How remarkable! And yet we need not be surprised if we know anything of our own hearts. Anything for the poor human heart except the bare word of the living God. A sign, a token, something the eye can see. The word of God is not enough for unbelieving nature.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

God's answer: more than Gideon asked for

Commentators differ on the request. Some call it distrust; others say God is never offended when faith asks for confirmation. Both agree on how He answered:

But oh, the matchless grace of God! His love that never scolds! His tender thoughtfulness! He graciously meets the weakness of His poor servant... What grace, that He should stoop so low! He does not rebuke Gideon's unbelieving "if." Instead He confirms his wavering faith with more evidence than Gideon asked for.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer sets Gideon beside Abraham:

The boldness of faith, even when it seems to need confirming signs, never offends our gracious God. God promised Abraham every blessing, and that he would inherit the land of Canaan. Abraham asks, "How am I to know that I shall possess it?" Is God offended that His word is not enough? No — He gives the wonderful night vision of the furnace and the flaming torch.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why dew, and why a fleece

Dew carried a settled meaning in Israel's life and language:

Dew was the familiar sign of God's favour. It was largely the source of the land's fertility. Without it the land would have been parched and barren. Isaac uses this figure when he pronounces the blessing on Jacob. Moses repeats it in his closing blessing on the tribes. Elijah shows God's judgment on the land by declaring that no dew would fall... All refreshing, for Israel or for the Church, comes by the Holy Spirit. The divine dew is His blessed influence, bringing refreshing and help. Just as the land bears no fruit without dew, nothing grows where the Spirit's work is hindered.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A fleece is the wool cut off a sheep. That matched the nation's condition under Midian:

And how the people had been sheared, we might say, by the Midianites, until nothing was left but the fleece, a remnant.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The fleece and the ground: a picture of Israel and the nations

Writers have also read the fleece and the ground as a sketch of a longer history:

The fleece in the middle of the ground is a picture of Israel in the middle of the nations. The dew is the symbol of divine grace and mercy. It is the Lord who forsakes and who refreshes Israel. Israel today is like the fleece without the dew, while the ground, the Gentiles, has the grace of God. But before long the dew will fall on Israel again, and the time of their blessing and fullness will come.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A foreshadowing of Christ

One writer looks at the wet fleece and sees more than a sign for Gideon:

His first sign was a fleece of wool soaked with dew, while everything around it was dry. Is this not a picture of the Lord Jesus in this world? Everything in this world (apart from God acting by His Spirit) was dry and lifeless as far as God was concerned.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

What the wet fleece asks of us

One writer turns Gideon's request into a prayer for the reader:

Gideon's request was that the fleece should be soaked with what the earth knew nothing of... Are we prepared to say to God: "Let the dew be on the fleece; let us be soaked, baptized, entirely marked out by what the earth does not have?" That is Christ, surely. Only as our hearts and minds feed on Him will we carry the heavenly character and stand out from what is of the earth... Your own efforts will always be fruitless. You cannot perform a miracle. Only the power of God can bring this about.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Laying out a fleece today

This passage is often used as a method for finding God's will:

Today some Christians use this history as an excuse. They expect a material sign from God about what His will may be in a given matter. But let believers remember that we have the Spirit of God living in us. We can fully depend on God's Word together with the leading of the Spirit. So we need no confirming signs — only genuine communion with the Lord and faith in His Word.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Doubt. Gideon's "if" stands in front of a promise God had already made. The human heart wants something the eye can see, not the bare word of God.

- Grace. God meets weak faith with kindness and gives more proof than Gideon asked for.

- Dew. Dew is the familiar sign of God's favour and stands for the Spirit's refreshing. Where it is withheld, the land is barren.

- Israel. The sheared fleece on the floor pictures Israel among the nations — dry now, but the dew of God's favour will fall on them again.

- Christ. The fleece soaked with dew in a dry world pictures the Lord Jesus. The believer's prayer is to be marked out by that same heavenly character.

Judges 6:38 · Darby

And it was so. And when he rose up early on the morrow, he pressed the fleece together, and wrung dew out of the fleece, a bowl-full of water.

Gideon had asked for a sign: a fleece of wool left out overnight, wet while the ground around it stayed dry. By morning it held a bowlful of dew — which raises two questions: why did a called man need proof, and what does the fleece picture?

A heart that wanted more than God's word

God had already given Gideon His word. One writer points to the small word Gideon set in front of it.

The poor heart can place its unbelieving "if" right in front of the word of God who cannot lie... Anything for the poor human heart but the naked word of the living God. A sign, a token, something that the eye can see. The word of God is not enough for unbelieving nature.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

God answers without rebuke

God could have rebuked His servant. Instead He answered with more than Gideon asked.

But oh, the matchless grace of God! His love that never scolds! His tender care! He graciously meets the weakness of His poor servant... What grace, that stoops so low! Instead of sharply rebuking Gideon's unbelieving "if," He confirms his wavering faith with overflowing evidence.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

One writer measures the answer against ordinary dew.

To see how fully God answered, he wrung the water out of the fleece and found a bowl full of water! Those of us who have left clothes outside overnight may have found them damp in the morning. But there was never a bowl full of water in them from the dew.

Modernised from L. A. StasselOriginal wording

Two kinds of asking for a sign

So why grant Gideon a sign, when God refused the Jews who asked for one?

It is one thing to seek a sign in order to believe in God. It is quite another to seek one that confirms us in the rightness of the path we have entered, and in God's support of us in it. The first the Lord will not grant or allow. "No sign will be given to this generation," He says to the Jews... The divine path must be begun and entered in faith, without signs. But the Lord keeps giving evidence to confirm the soul that is in the right path.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The fleece and the ground around it

One writer reads the wool as Israel and the dew as God's grace.

The fleece in the midst of the ground is the type of Israel in the midst of the nations. The dew is the symbol of divine grace and mercy. It is the Lord who forsakes and who refreshes Israel. Israel today is like the fleece without the dew, while the ground, the Gentile nations, shares in the grace of God. But before long the dew will fall upon Israel again and the time of their blessing and fulness will come.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Read that way, the present dryness is not abandonment.

His very chastenings are a pledge of future mercy. The Jews are dry now, while blessing has come to the Gentiles. That very dryness is sure proof that God will one day step in for His beloved earthly people.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Dew on one place only

One writer sees the soaked fleece in a dry world as a picture of Christ.

His first sign was that of a fleece of wool saturated with dew, while all around was dry. Is this not a picture of the Lord Jesus in this world? All in this world (apart from God's acting by His Spirit) was dry and lifeless as far as God was concerned. There was not a drop of refreshing moisture for God in the world.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Another writer follows that picture to the cross.

There He was made a curse when He took our sins upon Himself. There the dew was wrung from Him. He cried out: "I thirst." ... But now the dew is on all the ground. The ground that sin cursed can now receive the blessing of God! Everyone can now receive the "dew of heaven!"

Modernised from L. A. StasselOriginal wording

What it asks of us

One writer turns Gideon's request into a question for us.

Are we ready to say to God: "Let the dew be on the fleece. Let us be soaked, baptized, completely marked by what the earth does not have"? ... You may tell me that this is your desire, but that all your efforts have been in vain. And let me assure you that your efforts always will be fruitless. You cannot perform a miracle.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — Gideon set an unbelieving "if" in front of a promise God had already spoken. The eye wanted what the word had already given.

- Gift — God did not scold the weakness. He gave more than Gideon asked — a fleece yielding a bowlful.

- Limit — God does not give signs to start faith. He gives them to steady a soul already walking in the path He appointed.

- Reach — the fleece pictures Israel among the nations. Israel is dry today while the nations receive grace, but the dew will fall on Israel again.

- Result — the dew wrung out is what reaches the dry ground; no effort of ours produces it, only God.

Judges 6:39 · Darby

And Gideon said to God, Let not thine anger be hot against me, and I will speak but this once! Let me prove, I pray thee, but this once with the fleece; let it, I pray thee, be dry upon the fleece only, and upon all the ground let there be dew.

Gideon has already asked God for a sign with the fleece, and God gave it. Now he asks for the same test in reverse, and he starts by begging God not to be angry — which raises the question readers still bring here: is this faith, or unbelief?

Grace That Answers Again

Gideon had proof enough, and still he asked for more. Commentators dwell less on his weakness than on the God who answers him anyway.

And yet all this was not enough. Gideon seeks still further confirmation… Such is the abounding grace and endless patience of the God we have to deal with. Who would not trust Him, and love Him, and serve Him?

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Gideon himself expects a rebuke for asking:

God gives another proof of how graciously He stoops to us. He grants a sign to strengthen the weak but real and sincere faith of Gideon. As he repeats his request (v. 39), Gideon feels that God might well discipline him for his lack of faith. Still, the Lord grants what he asks.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Faith or Failure?

Commentators differ on how to read the second request. One view treats it as a low point: Gideon tests a God who had already spoken clearly.

All God's orders to Gideon were clear and simple. But when Gideon asked God for signs, everything became unclear and complicated… Having tested God, Gideon now put Him to a test in return. What poor faith! What feeble confidence in Him! But the God of grace patiently did what His servant asked.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Others see the same request as bold faith, not failure:

The boldness of faith, even when it seems to need confirming signs, never offends our gracious God. When He promised Abraham every blessing, and the land of Canaan, Abraham asked how he could know he would inherit it. Is God offended that His word is not enough? No — He gives him the wonderful night vision of the furnace and the flaming torch.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Dew Meant

The sign works because dew already carried a settled meaning in Israel.

Dew was the familiar sign of God's favour. Much of the land's fertility came from it, and without it the land would have been parched and barren… And Hosea, describing the restoration of the nation when God will bless them again, describes Him as saying, "I will be like the dew to Israel; he shall blossom like the lily; he shall take root like the trees of Lebanon."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same writer draws the line from dew to the Holy Spirit:

We know that all refreshing, whether for Israel or the Church, is by the Holy Spirit, and that the divine dew is His blessed influence bringing refreshing and help. Just as without the dew the land would stop being fruitful, so without the Spirit's unhindered work there can be no fruit. Barrenness will be the result.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Fleece and the Ground

Commentators read the wool on the threshing floor, with open ground all round it, as a picture of Israel among the nations.

The fleece of the shorn sheep pictures desolate Israel, which will be filled with the dew of God's blessing while drought lies on the nations around. But the reverse may also be of God: while His mercies refresh the nations around, Israel for her sins may be left dry. Either way, this is no mere natural event… To see His hand in every condition, however opposite, and to own His power and rule everywhere — this is the secret of wisdom, and of strength no less.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Read that way, the dry fleece with wet ground speaks of the present stretch of history:

The dew on the floor and not on the fleece suggests the blessing that has come to the nations during the time of Israel's rejection. We might say the present time.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Dry Fleece and the Cross

One writer sees the cross of Christ in the reversal.

This time the fleece of wool was dry, while all around was dew. How movingly this reminds us of the cross of Christ. God forsook Him who was as the dew of the morning, so that the dew of God's grace might rest on the dry and barren waste of humanity.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Asking God for Signs Today

The chapter is often used to justify "putting out a fleece." One writer draws a careful line through it.

Seeking a sign to establish belief in God is one thing. Seeking one to confirm that the path we have entered is right, and that God supports us in it, is quite another. The first the Lord will not grant or allow… The divine path must be begun in faith, without signs. But the Lord keeps on giving evidence to confirm the soul that is in the right path.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Dew — the settled sign of God's favour and fruitfulness. Where it falls there is blessing; where God holds it back, barrenness.

- Dew on the fleece — God's favour resting on His own people while all around them stays dry.

- Dew on the ground — the reversal Gideon asks for here: blessing reaching the nations while Israel stays dry.

- Dryness borne — blessing for the barren ground came at a cost: God forsook the One who was as the morning dew.

- Dew for the doubter — God did not rebuke Gideon for asking twice. He answered him, and confirmed a servant already on the right path.

Judges 6:40 · Darby

And God did so that night, and it was dry upon the fleece only, but on all the ground there was dew.

Gideon has already seen the wool soaked with dew on dry ground, and now he asks God to run the test backwards — dry wool, wet earth. God gives him what he asks, which raises two questions: why a second sign, and what does the reversal picture?

Asking Again After God Has Spoken

Gideon already had God's word, yet he asked for one more sign. One commentator sees what that reveals about the human heart:

How remarkable! And yet we need not be surprised if we know anything of our own hearts. Anything for the poor human heart but the plain word of the living God. A sign, a token, something the eye can see. The word of God is not enough for unbelieving nature.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

God Answers Without Rebuke

God answers the same night, and without a word of rebuke. One commentator sees the character of God in that reply:

And yet all this was not enough. Gideon seeks still further confirmation... Such is the abounding grace and endless patience of the God we have to deal with. Forever praised be His holy name! Who would not trust Him, and love Him, and serve Him?

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Two Kinds of Asking for a Sign

So why does God refuse signs elsewhere and grant one here? One writer draws a line between two kinds of asking:

It is one thing to seek a sign in order to believe in God. It is a very different thing to seek one that confirms we are on the right path, and that God supports us in it. The first the Lord will not grant or allow. "No sign will be given to you," He says to the Jews, when they asked for a sign as a ground of belief. We must enter God's path by faith, without signs. But the Lord keeps giving evidence to confirm the soul that is on the right path, and that it will succeed there.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Fleece and the Ground

One writer reads the wool as Israel and the bare ground as the nations around them. On that reading, the two signs mark two eras:

When Gideon asks for the dew on the fleece, it speaks of God giving His blessing to His persecuted people. This is true not only of that time, but of the last days, when He will be as the dew to Israel. When the dew appears on the floor and not on the fleece, it suggests the blessing that has come to the Gentiles during the period of Israel's rejection. We might say the present time.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same writer adds that a dry season is not abandonment:

But whether He gives or withholds blessing, God is showing Himself for His people. His very chastenings are a pledge of future mercy. The Jews are dry now, while blessing has come upon the Gentiles. That very dryness is a sure proof that God will one day step in for His beloved earthly people.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Dry Fleece and the Cross

Another writer sees the second sign pointing forward to Christ — one dry thing in a world covered with dew:

And this brings us to Gideon's second sign. This time the fleece of wool was dry, while all around was dew. How movingly this reminds us of the cross of Christ. God forsook Him who was as the dew of the morning, so that the dew of God's grace might rest on the dry and barren waste of humanity... "my strength is dried up like a potsherd." (Ps. 22:15)

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The dryness, on this view, had a purpose beyond itself:

God forsook His Son so that His attitude toward this world might be one of grace and blessing, so that the dew of His goodness might rest on it.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

A Prayer to Pray

A dry fleece in a soaked field is a picture of not absorbing your surroundings. One writer turns the sign into a request a believer can make:

Gideon had one more request to make before he took the field; it was that the fleece might be dry and all the earth wet. Here we have the negative side of the matter, which naturally follows the positive. For us it means this: let us be free in heart and character from what soaks the earth. Let its maxims, principles, ways, hopes and ambitions have no place in our lives. They can only spoil our enjoyment of Him.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Doubt asks. Gideon had God's word and still wanted something his eye could see. The word of God is not enough for unbelieving nature.

- Grace answers. God does not scold. He gives the sign that same night — "abounding grace and endless patience."

- Confirmation, not proof. God refuses a sign asked as a ground for believing. He gives one to steady a soul already walking in the right path.

- The dew moves. Wet fleece on dry ground pictures blessing on Israel. Dry fleece on wet ground pictures blessing reaching the nations while Israel waits. The dry season is itself a pledge that mercy will return.

- The dry One. At the cross Christ was dried up so that the dew of God's grace could fall on a barren world. Now we are called to stay dry of what soaks that world.

Judges 7:1 · Darby

And Jerubbaal, who is Gideon, arose early, and all the people that were with him, and they encamped beside the spring Harod; and he had the camp of Midian on the north by the hill of Moreh in the valley.

Two armies face each other across a valley. One man leads Israel, and he carries two names: Gideon, and the name he was given after he pulled down Baal's altar. What happens next at the spring shows why God was more concerned about the size of Israel's army than about Midian's.

Two names, one man

The verse puts both names side by side. One writer reads them together as a picture of the man who now takes the field:

With his faith refreshed, Jerubbaal, the challenger of the idols — who is also Gideon, the "cutter-down" — rises up early with all the people, and camps opposite the enemy by the spring of trembling (Harod). And there, right in front of the vast host of Midian, God makes him send away more than two thirds of his small army.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Gideon did not choose that second name. It came to him along with people's hatred:

He was hated. But what did that matter? He received the name Jerubbaal (let Baal plead). In front of everyone he became the personal witness that the things he once worshipped were worthless.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Home before the battlefield

Gideon did not start at the battlefield. He started at home:

God's weapons cut down the evil at home before they cut it down abroad. This is the principle of 2 Timothy 2:21: "Therefore, if anyone cleanses himself from what is dishonorable, he will be a vessel for honorable use, set apart as holy, useful to the master of the house, ready for every good work." The Lord's vessel must not hold anything that is unsuited to the Lord.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

A spring named "trembling"

The name of the place matters. One reference work describes Harod as "a well, or more correctly a spring… a large pool, at which many might drink at the same time" (Morrish Bible Dictionary). The name itself means trembling, and it described the men camped there:

Now we see Gideon together with the people. This is not so much his preparation for the service as theirs. The whole army, some thirty-two thousand men, camps at a well with a fitting name — the well of Harod, or "trembling." No doubt that described the state of most of them. For when the Lord had him announce through the army that all who were afraid should go home, twenty-two thousand took the offer.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Positioned so the credit cannot be misplaced

The moment the camp is pitched, God steps in — not to reinforce Gideon, but to reduce him:

Ready in this way, he "rose early and encamped beside the spring of Harod" with all the people who were with him. Here the Lord steps in, to declare the work as His own. Israel must have no room to boast against God and say, "My own hand has saved me."… It must have tested Gideon's faith to see 22,000 of the people leave his ranks. But where there is faith, this is always the demand.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Crowds are not strength

Gideon had a real army behind him. God would not use it:

Thirty-two thousand men followed Gideon. But Jehovah will not have so many. He alone must be glorified in their deliverance. Their faith was so weak, even while the Spirit of God was at work, that twenty-two thousand men were content to turn back at Gideon's invitation, right in front of the enemy. The movement produced by the faith of another is quite a different thing from personal faith.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

That pull toward numbers did not die with Midian:

There is a subtle desire for numbers in all of us. Why do we want statistics — numbers of conversions, numbers of members — unless we think the power lies in the numbers?… We should indeed rejoice for the many who receive blessing. But our eye is not to be on the many; it is to be on the Lord.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The way up runs downward

The pattern of this chapter runs through all of God's dealings:

He never honours us when we are thinking that we are anything. Great blessing has often come after deep humbling, sometimes even humbling in the eyes of others. We were brought low, and the Lord lifted us up.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cleared — Gideon pulled down the idol at home before God sent him out against the enemy. God cleans the vessel before He uses it.

- Named — the name "Jerubbaal," let Baal plead, came to him through the hatred of others, and it made him a living witness that his old idols were worthless.

- Trembling — he camps at a spring whose name, Harod, matched the state of most of his army.

- Reduced — God steps in at once to cut the numbers, so Israel could never say that their own hand had saved them.

- Lifted — He does not honour us while we think we are something; He brings low first, then raises up.

Judges 7:2 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Gideon, The people that are with thee are too many for me to give Midian into their hand, lest Israel vaunt themselves against me, saying, Mine own hand hath saved me.

Gideon has gathered 32,000 men against Midian, and God's first word to him is that he has too many. The reason is not military but moral: Israel might claim the victory as its own.

A Plea Never Heard in War

God's objection would sound strange on any battlefield. He is not reading the odds the way a general reads them.

"The LORD said to Gideon, 'The people with you are too many.'" What a blessed thing it is to have One to guide us who is entirely independent of circumstances!… No one going to war in this world had ever heard such a reason before. It is good to have God to judge for us, whether in peace or war, service or suffering.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God Claims the Work as His Own

God steps in early to settle who will own the victory. Watching the army shrink cost Gideon something.

Here the Lord steps in, in order to declare the work as His own. Israel must have no room to boast against God and say, "My own hand has saved me."… It must have been a trial to Gideon's faith to see 22,000 of the people retire from his standard: but this is always the demand where there is faith. If he has believed, he must not lose heart when the means he counted on almost entirely melt away. But Gideon is now strong in God, taught by God's gracious dealing, and he is not discouraged. He need not be: it is better for a man of faith to be with a few faithful people than with many who are weak and wavering.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Weakness Is the Method, Not the Problem

Israel came out in force. God's way of winning runs the other direction.

In this day of battle with the Midianites, the army of Israel went out thirty-two thousand strong… It is God's way to work in the weakness of man, so that "the surpassing power belongs to God and not to us."

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

What God Is Guarding Against

God is guarding against something real. We take the credit even while serving Christ.

Flesh cannot be trusted. It will turn the very service of Christ into an occasion of self-exaltation. It will use the very name of Him who made Himself nothing in order to make itself something. It will build up its own reputation by seeming to further the cause of Him who made Himself of no reputation. Such is flesh! Such are we in ourselves!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Mackintosh names a quieter danger: living on someone else's faith.

There is always great danger of our being mere imitators of other people's faith; of copying their example without their spiritual power… Let us be simple, and humble, and real. We may be very small, our sphere very narrow, our path very retired; but it does not matter in the least, provided we are precisely what grace has made us… Then our God can use us, without fear of our boasting.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Counting Heads Today

This danger did not end with Israel.

At such a period God takes special care to hold down the pride that would attach credit to man in a work which belongs to Himself alone. The Christian world today boasts of how many followers it has, thinking that numbers are a factor in the work of God. If He does any work, she takes the credit for herself. Like Laodicea, she is proud of her resources: "I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Aim: A People Who Trust Him

Cutting the army down was not only about preventing a boast. God had something to teach.

God's great design in His dealings was to teach Israel to trust in Himself. He wants to find in His people a true heart. A true heart makes a strong hand. Having confidence in the Captain of our salvation and not in ourselves, we do not faint at the sight of our enemies.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Too many. God's only complaint about Gideon's army is its size. No one going to war ever heard such a reason before.

- The danger. Big numbers would let Israel boast. So God shrinks the army first and claims the work as His own.

- The reason. Flesh turns the service of Christ into self-exaltation. It uses the name of the One who made Himself nothing to make itself something.

- The method. God works in man's weakness, so that the surpassing power belongs to Him and not to us. Small is His setting, not His problem.

- The aim. He is teaching His people to trust Him. A true heart makes a strong hand. Trust the Captain of our salvation, not yourself, and the sight of the enemy will not make you faint.

Judges 7:3 · Darby

And now proclaim in the ears of the people, saying, Whoever is timid and afraid, let him go back and turn from mount Gilead. And there went back of the people twenty-two thousand; and there remained ten thousand.

Before the battle with Midian, God's first move is to shrink Gideon's army. This proclamation sends more than two-thirds of the men home. Why would the Lord weaken the force He Himself had gathered, and what does He look for in the ones who stay?

God's Verdict: "Too Many"

The order to cut the army down comes from a Commander who does not count the way armies do. One writer notes how strange this order sounds beside any other war council.

What a blessed thing it is to have One to guide us who is entirely independent of circumstances! "The people that are with you are too many." Never before in going to war in this world was such a plea heard. It is good to have God judge for us, whether in peace or war, service or suffering.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Reasons for the Proclamation

Sending the fearful home serves two purposes. It keeps panic out of the army, and it keeps man from claiming the credit.

God had always provided for this. In the law He had directed this proclamation, so that timid men would not start a panic by spreading their fear. But He has another reason here. There were too many people for the truth to be perfectly plain: divine power, not human power, had won the victory. Man is too prone to boast, and he must lose every chance to do so, or boast he surely will.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God Repeats His Own Law

Gideon is not inventing a rule of his own. One writer shows that God is recalling a command He had already given through Moses.

This was a direct appeal to His own word in Deuteronomy 20:8: "Is there any man who is fearful and fainthearted? Let him go back to his house, lest he make the heart of his fellows melt like his own." How precious it is to find God recalling His word given through Moses!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Makes a Man Fearful

One writer reads the surrounding law in Deuteronomy and finds that fear is tied to what a man is holding on to.

The same passage teaches us that those who were fearful and trembling were those who had something to lose. A servant of God is full of courage for his work when he has nothing to lose here. The excellence of Christ has made him despise what the world values. Alas, how many fearful ones there are in our days, just as there were then... God wants undivided hearts for His work — hearts that have nothing to lose and fear nothing.

Modernised from Henri RossierOriginal wording

How Fear Spreads — and Its Cure

A frightened man must leave before the fighting starts. His fear does not stay his own.

Faint-heartedness is terribly contagious. It spreads rapidly. It withers the arm that should bear the shield, and paralyses the hand that should wield the sword. The only cure for this illness is simple confidence in God. We need a firm grasp of His faithfulness, a child-like trust in His word, and a true personal knowledge of Him. We must know God for ourselves. His word must be everything to us. Then we can walk alone with Him, and stand alone with Him in the darkest hour.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Borrowed Faith and the Real Thing

The twenty-two thousand came out when Gideon called them. In front of the enemy, that was not enough.

Their faith was very weak, even while the Spirit of God was at work. Standing in front of the enemy, twenty-two thousand men were content to go home at Gideon's invitation. Being moved by someone else's faith is quite a different thing from having faith of your own.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Losing Numbers, Gaining Strength

On paper Gideon has just crippled himself. One writer says the opposite is true. He hears the same test in the Lord's own words to a man who offered to follow Him.

To all appearance, Gideon was weakening his own hands. At the first proclamation, twenty-two thousand left him. But he did not lose strength; their leaving made him stronger. If these fearful, faint-hearted men had stayed, they would have discouraged the rest.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

We know that the Lord Jesus sent out the proclamation, "Let those who will follow Me count the cost." One man said to Him, "Lord, I will follow you wherever you go." He answered, "Foxes have holes and the birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." And then there was fearfulness and faint-heartedness. Many had nothing but Christ, and everything else was against them. So they turned back and walked with Him no more.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Too many. God's complaint against Gideon's army is its size — a plea no other war council ever heard. He judges for His people in peace or war, service or suffering.

- Too catching. The fearful go home first because fear spreads. It withers the arm that should bear the shield. The cure is knowing God well enough to stand alone with Him.

- Too attached. The fearful men were the men with something to lose. God wants undivided hearts that have nothing to lose and fear nothing.

- Too borrowed. Being moved by someone else's faith is not the same as personal faith. It collapses in front of the enemy.

- Too glorious to share. The army must shrink until it is plain that divine, not human, power won the day — so Gideon lost 22,000 and was the gainer.

Judges 7:4 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Gideon, Still the people are many; bring them down to the water, and I will try them for thee there, and it shall be, that of whom I shall say unto thee, This shall go with thee, the same shall go with thee; and of whomsoever I shall say unto thee, This shall not go with thee, the same shall not go.

Gideon's army has already shrunk from thirty-two thousand to ten thousand. God says the number is still too high. This second sifting asks the men nothing: God brings them to water and watches.

Why the Army Must Shrink

The reduction is not a military calculation. God is guarding the credit for the victory.

And the Lord said, "The people with you are too many for me to give the Midianites into their hand, lest Israel boast over me, saying, 'My own hand has saved me.'" It is God's way to work in the weakness of man, "so that the surpassing power belongs to God and not to us."

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

God Does the Testing

God says He will do the trying. He also refuses to let any human advantage count.

God will not allow human learning, influence, moral character, or anything else to come in as any part of our deliverance... There is such a thing as the trial of our faith. We are very often quite unable to test one another, but God knows the best way of doing it in each case.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The men were never told a test was running.

How solemn it is to remember that God tests us without our knowledge. If we knew when the test was coming, we would be on our best behaviour. But God watches us when we least think it, and He accepts or rejects us for the posts of danger and honour.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Drink of Water as the Dividing Line

The ten thousand had already passed the test of courage. The brook divided them by how they drank.

These people were really not afraid to go to the battle, as those were who had left earlier; they were all soldiers ready for war. The test was this: whether, on that thirsty day, they would lap the water, putting the hand to the mouth, or bow down and drink at their ease. The three hundred chosen ones, the men by whom the Lord was about to work, had no time for stopping. Their hearts were in the work, and they merely took a drink as they went on their way.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Being In Life's Affairs, or Tangled In Them

The three hundred drank and moved on. Paul draws the same line for a soldier.

Paul speaks of the soldier who is not "entangled in civilian pursuits" (2 Tim. 2:4); all that we can safely take, if we would "please the one who enlisted" us, is just a drink along the way. There is a very great difference between being in the circumstances of this life and being entangled with them. When the Lord tested them, those who bowed down were not fit for His use. They were no more fit than the faint-hearted, though they were not faint-hearted themselves. They had to go home.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What the Water Reveals About Ordinary Needs

The water was one of God's mercies. The test lay in what the men did with it.

Here we see the true use of the mercies of God. We need food and clothing and shelter, and God puts all of them within our reach. How shall we treat them? If our aim is to get as much of them as possible, we have become their servants. We cannot face the enemy, because we have begun to set our minds on earthly things. But if we take them only as God's mercies, and are content with what we have, we shall prove ourselves fit vessels for His service. We are here not to pile up treasure on earth, but for the testimony of the Lord.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Dismissed, but Still God's People

Failing a test of fitness is not the same as failing to belong.

It is not a question of salvation; it is a question of service. Gideon dismissed thirty-one thousand seven hundred men from his army. They were as much Israelites as the three hundred who remained. But they were not fitted for the moment of conflict; they were not the right men for the crisis. And why?... They could not trust God and surrender self. They were full of fear when they ought to have been full of faith. They made refreshment their object instead of conflict.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

How God Still Wins

The pattern did not stop with Gideon.

Only three hundred stood the test. Their hearts were in God's battles that day. They did not refuse the blessing when it came their way, out of a strict self-denial, but they were not entangled by it. That was the point... And God delivered Israel by the three hundred self-denying men. The victory was won. And God is delivering many at the present hour by means of the faithful, prayerful, earnest, self-denying few.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Summary

- Too many. God thins the ranks so that no one can say a human hand won the battle; He works in weakness on purpose.

- Tried by God. We cannot test one another, but God can, and He tested them without warning.

- Tried by water. Courage was tested first. Then a plain drink of water showed who took it and went on, and who settled down at ease.

- Tried, not rejected. The thousands sent home were true Israelites. They failed a test of service, not of salvation.

- Trusted with the work. God uses those who trust Him and surrender self — few, self-denying, hearts in the battle.

Judges 7:5 · Darby

And he brought down the people to the water; and Jehovah said to Gideon, Every one that lappeth of the water with his tongue, as a dog lappeth, him shalt thou set by himself; likewise every one that boweth down on his knees to drink.

Gideon's army has already shrunk from thirty-two thousand to ten thousand. God says the number is still too large. The last sifting turns on a drink of water, and it decides who goes into battle.

Why God kept reducing the army

Everyone who was afraid had already gone home. So why cut the ten thousand further?

Here the Lord steps in to declare the work as His own. Israel must have no room to boast against God and say, "My own hand has saved me." … But though less than a third of the original number remained, even that number the Lord calls "too many." He orders a test for the whole remaining company, to sift it and prove who was really fit to fight and testify for Him. To human eyes this test looks simple and unimportant. Spiritually, it searches the heart.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What the two ways of drinking revealed

Every man left at the water was ready to fight. The stream drew the line.

God's ways are strange to human reasoning; the unbeliever laughs at them. Unlike those who left earlier, these men were not afraid to go into battle. They were all soldiers ready for war. Here was the test. On that thirsty day, would they lap the water, putting their hand to their mouth? Or would they bow down and drink at their ease? The three hundred chosen ones were the men through whom the Lord was about to work. They had no time to stop. Their hearts were in the work, and they took a drink as they went on their way.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The dog's way of drinking

Why should the way a man drinks matter?

Kneeling down and drinking at leisure is the natural way for a man to do it. They showed by this that they were inclined to take things easy and satisfy their need to the full. Taking the water into the hand and lapping it like a dog is not the natural way for a man to drink. They were less absorbed with satisfying their natural wants. They showed by it their eagerness to press on.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

There is more in the dog picture than speed.

These three hundred, who lapped the water as a dog laps, drinking what the hand carried to the mouth, were not only the devoted ones, but the humble ones. They remind us of the poor Syrophoenician woman. When she was compared to a dog, she answered, "Yes, Lord," happy to depend only on His grace (Mark 7:28). God wants devoted yet humble witnesses.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

A test with no announcement

Nobody warned the men at the water.

The test seems a plain one. We must quench thirst, but it must not become so absorbing that it takes first place. The needs of this life are obvious, but are they first with us? Do we snatch up the things of this life as we pass, or are they what occupies us completely? … How solemn it is to remember that we are tested without knowing it. If we knew when the test was coming, we would be on our best behaviour. But God is watching us when we least think it. He accepts or rejects us for posts of danger and honour. … Only one thing can make us answer to God's test: a heart that is absolutely set upon His will.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Not a question of salvation, but of usefulness

Were the men sent home any less God's people?

The thirty-one thousand seven hundred sent home from Gideon's army were just as much Israelites as the three hundred who remained. But they were not fitted for the moment of conflict. They were not the right men for the crisis. And why? … They could not trust God and surrender self. They were full of fear when they should have been full of faith. They made refreshment their object instead of conflict.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The issue is not refusing life's blessings. It is how much room we give them.

Being in the circumstances of this life is one thing. Being entangled with them is a very different thing. When the Lord tested them, those who bowed down were not fit for His use — no more fit than the faint-hearted, though these men were not faint-hearted. They had to go home.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The pattern seen in Christ Himself

Two ways of taking a blessing — and the Lord Himself shows one of them.

Some seek their ease. They enjoy to the full the blessings which God's providence has placed in their path. Others have one aim only: to win the victory. They refuse to turn aside from their object. They taste the water along the way, and find in it only what strengthens them for their service. It is said of the Lord, "He will drink from the brook by the way" (Psalm 110:7). When He drank in this way, "He set His face to go to Jerusalem" (Luke 9:51), the place of His agony and death.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Too many. God shrank the army so the victory could never be credited to Israel's own hand.

- Too small to notice. The deciding test was a drink of water — trivial to human eyes, searching in what it exposed.

- Too absorbed. The men who knelt and drank at leisure put refreshment before the fight.

- Too late to prepare. The men were tested without knowing it, which is how God still weighs His servants.

- Enough for God. The men sent home were true Israelites. The issue was not salvation but fitness for service. Three hundred were enough.

Judges 7:6 · Darby

And the number of them that lapped, with their hand to their mouth, were three hundred men; and all the rest of the people bowed down on their knees to drink water.

Gideon's army has already dropped from thirty-two thousand men to ten thousand. God now sifts it again by one small thing: the way each man takes a drink.

The test at the water

The men still standing had already passed one test: the frightened had gone home. What set the three hundred apart was something finer than courage.

God's ways look strange to human sense, and unbelievers mock them. These men were not afraid to go into battle, unlike those who left earlier. They were all soldiers, armed and ready for war. The test was this: on that thirsty day, would they lap the water with the hand to the mouth, or bow down and drink at their ease? The three hundred chosen ones, the men the Lord was about to work by, had no time to stop. Their hearts were in the work, and they took only a drink as they went on their way.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Drinking like men, or like soldiers

Kneeling to drink is the natural, comfortable way — which is exactly why it disqualified a man here.

"Everyone who laps the water with his tongue, as a dog laps" — not those who took the water with ease, as at ordinary times, and like men. This was the very thing they wanted deliverance from: themselves and their comforts. The question here was not only faint-heartedness, but whole-hearted devotion to the Lord and to the work in front of them. If we are to be good soldiers of Jesus Christ, we must not live as mere men do, or tangle ourselves up in the affairs of this life. The faith that counts on God is willing even to be counted as a dog before Him. Those God would use must not seek their own ease or honour.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Mercies tasted on the way

The water was a kindness from God, not a trap. The question was whether a man stopped there. One writer points to the Lord Himself as the pattern.

Some seek their ease and enjoy to the full those blessings which providence has placed in their path. Others have one aim only: to win the battle. They do not let anything turn them aside from it. They taste the water on the way, and find in it only what strengthens them for their service. It is said of the Lord, "He will drink from the brook by the way" (Psalm 110:7). When He drank like that, "He set His face to go to Jerusalem," the scene of His agony and death (Luke 9:51). Nothing holds a Christian back in his testimony like taking his ease. He settles down to enjoy the earthly blessings God gives him, instead of simply tasting them as he passes.

Modernised from Henri RossierOriginal wording

The test lands on what every one of us needs:

We need food and clothing and shelter, and these are all put within our reach. How shall we treat them? If our object is to get as much of these things as possible, we have become their servants.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Fitness for service, not salvation

The men sent home were not outsiders.

It is not a question of salvation; it is a question of service. It is not a question of being a child of God, but of being a proper servant of Christ. The thirty-one thousand seven hundred sent home from Gideon's army were just as much Israelites as the three hundred who stayed. But they were not fit for the moment of conflict. They were not the right men for the crisis. And why? Was it that they were not circumcised? No. What then? They could not trust God and surrender self. They were full of fear when they ought to have been full of faith. They made refreshment their object instead of conflict.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Examined while you are not looking

Nobody at the stream knew that God was watching how he drank. That silence is the sharpest part of the story.

The needs of this life are real, but are they chief with us?… How solemn it is to remember that God tests us without our knowledge. If we knew when the test was coming, we would be on our good behaviour. But God is watching us when we little think it, and accepting or rejecting us for the posts of danger and honour.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the number had to fall

Ten thousand willing soldiers were still too many, and the reason was not military.

The Lord's hand alone must be seen. This was what Israel needed — that the Lord should have His place in their hearts and their faith. And it suited God's just judgment on Israel that the rest should be left out of the glory of the work.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Tested twice. First the fearful go home; then God sets aside the comfortable. The second sifting cuts finer than the first.

- Tested by water. The drink was a real mercy and a real need. What divided the men was not that they drank, but that some stopped.

- Tested unawares. No man at the stream knew God was watching, and one drink of water showed the state of his heart.

- Tested for service. Those sent home were as truly God's people as those kept; the question was fitness for the fight, not salvation.

- Tested down to three hundred. The army shrank until only God's hand could explain the victory.

Judges 7:7 · Darby

And Jehovah said to Gideon, By the three hundred men that lapped will I save you, and give Midian into thy hand; and let all the people go every man to his place.

Gideon started with thirty-two thousand men; only three hundred remained after God sifted them at the water. Here God names the number He will use, which raises two questions: why cut down His own army, and what marked the men He kept?

Why the Army Had to Shrink

The reduction was not military strategy. God had already given Gideon the reason.

When all the people went up with Gideon, the LORD said to him: "The people with you are too many for me to give the Midianites into their hands." The danger was that Israel would boast against the LORD, saying, "My own hand has saved me." At such a time God takes special care to hold down the pride that would give man credit for a work that belongs to Him alone.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Others treat this as a standing rule, not a one-off.

Jonathan once said, "Nothing can hinder the LORD from saving by many or by few" (1 Samuel 14:6). When God is working, victory lies with the few rather than with the many. Gideon's three hundred men accomplished great things for God (Judges 7:7).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What the Water Test Measured

The men who drank on their knees were not cowards. The fearful had already gone home. This next test measured something else.

This at once separated two kinds of men: those who cared nothing for themselves, but only for what God had given them to do. The rest, even at such a moment, could stop to consult their own habits, their own preferences, their own ease. I believe this is exactly the truth meant here for our instruction. With a little handful of that kind, Gideon was to do his errand.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The difference showed in how each man handled a real need on a hot day.

God's ways are strange to human reasoning; the unbeliever scoffs at them. These people were genuinely not afraid to go into battle, unlike those who left earlier. They were all soldiers ready for war. The test was this: in that thirsty day, would they lap the water, putting the hand to the mouth, or bow down and drink at their ease? The three hundred chosen ones — those through whom the LORD was about to work — had no time for stopping. Their hearts were in the work, and they merely took a drink as they went on their way.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Fitness for Service, Not Standing With God

The dividing line was not membership in God's people.

What was the great question raised about Gideon's company? Was it whether a man was an Israelite, a son of Abraham, a circumcised member of the congregation? Not at all. What then? Simply whether he was a fit vessel for the service at hand. And what made a man fit for such service? Confidence in God and self-denial. God rejected those who were afraid (v. 3), and He rejected those who consulted their own ease (v. 7). The 31,700 whom He rejected were as truly Israelites as the 300 He approved, but they were not fit servants; the 300 were.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Tested by a Mercy

The thing that exposed the ten thousand was not a temptation to sin. It was a gift.

"Bring them down to the water, and I will test them there," is God's command. Water is one of God's greatest mercies. In this case a plentiful supply lay within reach of the army. The way they treated it showed their fitness to be God's warriors, or their unfitness. Nine thousand seven hundred stooped down to get as much as they could, and for the moment seemed to forget the fight. The three hundred took just what would meet their immediate need, and no more. The Lord's battle controlled them, and everything else waited.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Sending the Rest Away

The verse ends with a dismissal. That command still cuts against our habit of measuring strength by size.

There is a subtle craving for numbers in all of us. Why do people want statistics, numbers of conversions, numbers of "members"? Is it not because they think the power is in the numbers? Numbers have too often been the occasion for the pride that goes before destruction. Far be the thought that we should refuse numbers for their own sake. We should certainly be glad for the many who receive blessing, but our eye is not to be on the many — it is to be on the Lord.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Too many. God called Gideon's army too large, because a big army would let Israel claim, "My own hand has saved me."

- Tested. The water was not a hardship but a mercy; how each man drank revealed whether the battle or his own comfort held him.

- Few. Three hundred stayed on their feet, taking only a drink by the way — their hearts were in the work.

- Sent home. Those dismissed were true Israelites. The test was fitness for service, not standing with God.

- Saved. "With the 300 men who lapped I will save you" — God claims the victory as His before a single blow falls.

Judges 7:8 · Darby

And they took the victuals of the people in their hand, and their trumpets; and all the men of Israel he sent away, every man to his tent, but retained the three hundred men. Now the camp of Midian was beneath him in the valley.

God has sifted Gideon's army from thirty-two thousand men down to three hundred. The food and the trumpets stay with the few, the rest go home to their tents, and the enemy camp lies spread out in the valley below.

Why the Army Had to Shrink

The reduction was not a military decision but a protection against a boast. God gave the reason Himself.

When all the people went up with Gideon, the Lord said to him: "The people with you are too many for me to give the Midianites into their hand." The danger was that Israel would boast over the Lord and say: "My own hand has saved me." At such a time God takes special care to hold down the pride that would credit man with a work that belongs to Him alone. The Christian world today boasts of the number of its followers, thinking it sees in that a factor in the work of God. If He does any work, it claims the credit. Like Laodicea, it takes pride in its resources: "I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Small and Tested, Not Large and Respectable

The problem is not numbers, but untested numbers.

This is especially true in a day of decline, when God has raised up a remnant testimony to His truth. Numbers, if they are not truly clear — and I might say tested as these were — will only make the testimony unwieldy. A little company, tried and tested by God Himself, is far better than a large and respectable body that wins the world's respect by its size.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Marked the Three Hundred

The men sent away were not cowards; the fearful had already gone home. The difference was a drink of water.

God's ways are strange to human sense: the unbeliever laughs at them. These people were not afraid to go to battle, unlike those who had left earlier. They were all soldiers ready for war. The test was this: whether on that thirsty day they would lap the water, putting the hand to the mouth, or bow down and drink at their ease. The three hundred chosen ones were the men by whom the Lord was about to work. They had no time to halt, because their hearts were in the work. They only took a drink as they went on their way.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What They Carried

Two things stay in the hands of the three hundred.

These men took their trumpets in their hands, symbols of testimony, but they also took their food (v. 8). We cannot overcome without being fed, and Israel was proof of this under the terrible yoke of Midian, which left them without supplies.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Sent Home, and Left Out of the Glory

God cut the numbers further, and the men He sent home lost something real.

But ten thousand men are still too many. The Lord's hand alone must be seen. This was what Israel needed: the Lord must have His place in their hearts and faith. And it fitted the just judgment of God in Israel that, when it came to their part in the work, they should be left out of its glory.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Service, Not Salvation

A man sent home to his tent still belonged to God.

I need not say that this is no question of salvation. It is a question of service, of testimony. Can God use us as instruments to free His beloved people from the bondage of the world? Surely He cannot if we are partly bound to the world ourselves. How dreadful to think that we are not fit for service, and God has to set us aside! May it lead us to search our hearts. Is there a hidden slavery to the world in us, or a failure to put God's interests first? A small thing may show our state, even something as small as a drink of water. Only one thing can make us pass God's test, and that is a heart absolutely set on His will. "One thing I do," says the apostle.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Coming Down to the Water

The water test was not only for Gideon's men.

At the same time, dear friends, would not you and I have wanted our place to be with "the three hundred"? Shall we let the chance of confessing Jesus slip because we are saved? In the experience of almost every believer there is a coming down to the water — some turning point, when he either goes on in devotedness to the Lord, or else sinks into an ordinary, commonplace Christian. Not one of us is too obscure to be tested on whether he will put God's honour first, or present things.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Too many. God cut the army down so that no one could say his own hand had won the victory.

- Too thirsty. The men who knelt to drink at their ease were not cowards; the three hundred drank on the move, because their hearts were in the work.

- Too small to boast. In a day of decline, a little company tried by God is worth more than a large body the world respects.

- Enough to carry. They kept food and trumpets: supply for the fight and a testimony to sound.

- Enough to lose. The men sent home kept their salvation, but not their share in the glory. The test decided who served, not who was saved.

Judges 7:9 · Darby

And it came to pass in that night, that Jehovah said to him, Arise, go down to the camp; for I have given it into thy hand.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 7:10 · Darby

And if thou fear to go down, go thou with Phurah thy servant down to the camp;

God has just stripped Gideon's army down to three hundred men and told him to go down into the Midianite camp. Then comes a clause that reads his heart before he speaks: but if you are afraid to go down.

The Fear God Anticipates

The order to go down came with a built-in allowance. One writer traces that allowance to what God saw in His servant.

The Lord recognizes, however, the strain of all this upon Gideon's faith. He Himself now tenderly offers a means of encouragement. The enemy themselves were to provide it.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Obedience Comes First

Verse 9 is a command; verse 10 is a kindness. The command comes first.

Then comes another remarkable dealing of God with other instruction for us. "The LORD said to Gideon, 'Arise, go down against the camp, for I have given it into your hand.'" He was encouraged, though the work looked extremely dangerous. But what is that to the Lord? Ours is only to obey.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Sign Offered, Not Demanded

Earlier Gideon had asked for signs. This time he asks for nothing — the encouragement is God's own idea.

Again the patient care of God gives Gideon absolute assurance of victory before he goes into the fight. You will notice that Gideon does not ask for this sign, but takes it up when it is offered by God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God's answer depends on what the sign is asked to do.

Seeking a sign to establish belief in God is one thing. Seeking one to confirm us in the rightness of the path we have already entered is quite another. The first the Lord will not grant or allow. "No sign will be given," He says to the Jews, when they asked for a sign as a ground of belief. The divine path must be begun and entered in faith, without signs. But the Lord constantly gives evidence to confirm the soul that is in the right path, and that it will succeed there.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Fear Written Down Without Cover-Up

Scripture could have left this clause out. Gideon is remembered as a warrior, yet the record says he was afraid.

There is no book in the world comparable to the Bible for transparency. The writer was inspired to tell as calmly of Gideon's fear as of his courage. "If you are afraid to go down, go down with Purah." Who but God could speak out so simply? He was afraid, and takes the servant with him. Where is the honour of the successful warrior? It belongs to God alone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Fear Gained Him

Down in the camp, Gideon heard himself talked about.

In Judges 7:13 Gideon hears himself compared to a cake of barley bread. He would not have heard this if he had not been afraid (Judges 7:10). But it showed him all the more whose hand must give the victory.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The picture was not a flattering one, and that is the point.

The cake of barley bread was no great thing in itself or in men's eyes. But so it is that God delivers, not by wit, power, or wealth, but by His Spirit working through a despised instrument.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Listening to the Enemy

What Gideon heard in the camp has a wider use.

Nothing could be more alarming than the fearful odds against the people of faith — the world, the flesh, and the endless hostility of Satan! Who would not be faint-hearted if we saw only this? God is pleased to let Gideon hear what is in the Midianites' hearts. So too He is pleased to let us know very often what is in the hearts of our enemies.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The size of the opposition carries its own message.

As surely as Christ has triumphed over every power of evil, so surely we may conclude that every display of evil is really only a guarantee to us that a power is at hand for us that is more than superior to it. And the greater the evil opposition, the more marked and clear the power that will overcome and silence it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Encouraged Before the Battle

The trip did its work before a single blow was struck.

How many and varied are the ways of the Lord on behalf of His servants! In the enemy's camp the interpretation of a dream announces Gideon's success, and he hears how they already count on their own overthrow... Gideon was greatly encouraged by this. The God of the dew was brought near to him again. He worshipped, and returned in full assurance of victory before the conflict had begun.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear named. God does not wait for Gideon to confess being afraid; He names the fear in the same breath as the command.

- Fear allowed. The path still had to be entered in faith. But once a servant is on the right path, the Lord keeps giving evidence that it will succeed.

- Fear recorded. Scripture states the fear as plainly as the courage, so that the honour of the victory lands on God alone.

- Fear rewarded. Because he was afraid, Gideon heard himself called a loaf of barley bread. That comparison showed him whose hand would win.

- Fear answered. He came back worshipping, sure of the outcome before the fighting started.

Judges 7:11 · Darby

and thou shalt hear what they say; and afterwards shall thy hand be strengthened, and thou shalt go down unto the camp. And he went down with Phurah his servant to the outside of the armed men that were in the camp.

The night God sent Gideon down to the enemy camp, He added a word for Gideon's fear: take Purah, go down, and listen. Here Gideon takes that word. The man chosen to lead three hundred against a whole army walks to the edge of their camp with one servant, to listen.

Grace That Meets a Wavering Servant

The order came the same night the sifting of the army ended. Its wording makes room for fear.

This sifting must have tested Gideon's faith as well as his followers', for the drop in numbers threw him still more on dependence on God. "The same night" — now that the company is prepared, there must be no delay — the Lord tells him, "Go down against the camp." But with unusual graciousness, and with willingness to meet and strengthen any wavering in Gideon's faith, He adds, "If you are afraid to go down, go down with Purah your servant, and you shall hear what they say." How many are the ways of the Lord on behalf of His servants!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Walking up to an enemy camp looked dangerous. One writer weighs that danger against the Lord who gave the order.

He was encouraged, though it was a service of immense danger in appearance; but what is this to the Lord? Ours is only to obey.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Record That Does Not Flatter Its Hero

Scripture could have left Purah out of the story. It names him, and it names why he came.

There is no book in the world comparable to the Bible for transparency. The writer was inspired to tell as calmly of Gideon's fear as of his courage. "If you are afraid, go down with Purah." Who but God could speak out so simply? He was afraid, and takes with him the servant. Where is the honour of the successful warrior? It belongs to God alone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Words Overheard, Hands Strengthened

God's promise was that Gideon would hear what the enemy said among themselves. One writer takes that as God's way with His people still.

Nothing is more alarming than to see the fearful odds against the people of faith. Look at them: the world, the flesh, and Satan's unceasing hostility! Who would not be faint-hearted, if we saw only this? God is pleased to let Gideon hear what is in the Midianites' hearts. So too is He pleased to let us know, very often, what is in the hearts of our enemies. "Have you come here to torment us before the time?" lets out the secret. Almost everything the intelligent Christian hears tells him, "Be strong."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Armed Men in the Camp

Gideon reached the outposts of the armed men. One dictionary follows that word elsewhere in the Old Testament.

We read that the Israelites went out of Egypt "harnessed," or "by five in a rank" as the margin reads. Exodus 13:18. The same word, chamushim, is translated "armed" in reference to the way the Israelites crossed the Jordan, when they had plenty of time to arrange themselves in proper order. Joshua 1:14; Joshua 4:12. It is also translated "armed" when it refers to the army of the Midianites and the Amalekites as they were arranged in the camp before action. Judges 7:11. From this we gather that the Israelites did not travel in disorder... it was God who was bringing them out, and it would have been unworthy of Him to have had them moving as a disorderly rabble.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So Gideon crept up to the ordered ranks of a disciplined army, not a sleeping rabble. His one companion is identified simply:

Military attendant on Gideon. Judges 7:10-11.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Sign He Never Asked For

Notice when the assurance came: before the fight, not in the middle of it.

Once again God's patient care gives Gideon full assurance of victory before he goes into the fight. You will notice that Gideon does not ask for this sign, but uses it when God offers it. It is more than a sign. It begins in figurative language, and then the enemy himself gives the interpretation, along with the assurance of complete victory.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One writer turns this into a question for the reader.

You remember that Gideon feared to do his first work by day. Why should you not take the path of faith even with trembling? That is far better than boasting. May our God give us the courage of obedience, and though trembling, may we follow on in His path.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear allowed. God met Gideon's fear with graciousness. He gave him a servant and promised to strengthen his wavering faith.

- Fear recorded. The Bible tells of Gideon's fear as calmly as of his courage. That leaves the honour of the victory with God alone.

- Fear answered from outside. The enemy's own words strengthened Gideon's hands. God is still pleased to let His people hear what is in their enemies' hearts.

- Fear walked through. Gideon still had to walk down to an army drawn up for battle, with only one servant. God strengthened him on the way, not instead of the way.

- Fear outmatched. He did not ask for this sign. He used what God offered. Walking the path of faith while trembling is far better than boasting.

Judges 7:12 · Darby

And Midian and Amalek and all the children of the east lay along in the valley as locusts for multitude; and their camels were without number, as the sand upon the sea-shore for multitude.

Gideon has just watched his army shrink from thirty-two thousand to three hundred. Now God sends him down to the edge of the enemy camp. What he sees first is not a weapon or a promise, but the size of the army he must face.

The sight God arranged

Gideon's own army had nearly vanished before he ever saw the enemy's.

Gideon and his 300 men were on a hill above the camp of the Midianites, while 31,700 of his men returned home! There is no doubt the Lord knew that Gideon would feel pitifully weak with his small company. So He told Gideon to go down to the camp with only Purah his servant, to hear what those in the camp might be saying (vv. 10-11). Verse 12 tells us of the huge number of men and camels that might well have struck fear into Gideon's heart.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Scripture does not hide how the leader felt about it.

There is no book in the world as open and honest as the Bible. The writer tells of Gideon's fear as calmly as of his courage. "If you are afraid to go down, go down with Purah your servant." Who but God could speak so plainly? He was afraid, and he takes the servant with him. Where is the honour of the successful warrior? It belongs to God alone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who lay in the valley

The comparison to locusts is not only about numbers. It matches the way these raiders lived and what their name means.

Midian in this way stands for the world, as its history has shown it to be, and the name matches this, meaning "strife." … These Midianites were Arab raiders and wandering plunderers. Some think the name "Midian" is really linked to the modern word "Bedouin." Like locusts, they devoured what they had no will to produce, as the story here shows. This is what the world is when it is let into the professing church. It shares no interest with the church, but the opposite, and the result is nothing but ruin.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Three hundred against a full valley

Set side by side, the two armies make no military sense.

What is this "host of Israel"? Three hundred men! The Midianites are "like locusts in abundance," while the LORD's "host" is only a handful of men! It is most important to see the dignity given to the three hundred. God does not count us by what we are in ourselves, but by what He makes us.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Gideon cut down to size

Standing in front of that valley, Gideon then overhears a dream in which he himself is a loaf of cheap bread.

Then God placed him in front of the enemy, who lay along the valley like locusts in abundance, and drew his portrait through the mouth of one of them. This mighty warrior was compared to a cake of barley bread — coarse, plain food. And this was "the sword of Gideon"! What a sword to strike such a crowd with! But in reality, the sword of Gideon was "the sword of the LORD" (v. 20), and that is where the power lay.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Big numbers, bigger power

So why let Gideon look at the odds at all?

His purpose is to assure the soul of this. Christ has triumphed over every power of evil. We may be just as sure that every display of evil is only a guarantee to us that a power is at hand for us, far greater than it. And further, the greater the evil opposition, the clearer and more obvious the power that will overcome and silence it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The end of the battle showed what those numbers were worth.

"The cake of barley bread" and "the broken pitchers" proved a match for all the power of the Midianites and the Amalekites. And this was so even though they "lay along the valley like locusts in abundance, and their camels were without number, as the sand that is on the seashore in abundance." God was with the cake of barley bread and the pitchers. He will always be with those who are ready to take the low place, ready to be nothing and to make Him their all in all. … It does not matter what the difficulties are, or how many our enemies are, or how strong. All must give way before the presence of the living God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen — God walked Gideon up to the camp. He counted the men and the camels before the battle, not after.

- Named — Midian means strife. These were wandering raiders who stripped the land like locusts and took what they never grew.

- Counted — three hundred men faced a valley packed like locusts. God counts us not by what we are in ourselves, but by what He makes us.

- Shrunk — God showed Gideon the enemy's size, then let him hear himself called a cake of cheap barley bread. The sword that mattered was the LORD's.

- Overturned — the larger the opposition, the clearer the power that silences it. Numbers give way before the presence of the living God.

Judges 7:13 · Darby

And Gideon came, and behold, a man was telling a dream to his fellow; and he said, Behold, I dreamed a dream, and lo, a cake of barley-bread tumbled into the camp of Midian, and came to the tent, and smote it that it fell, and overturned it; and the tent lay along.

On the night before the battle Gideon is still afraid. He goes down to the edge of the enemy camp and overhears a soldier describing a dream. A loaf of the cheapest bread rolls in and flattens a tent. God used that strange picture to steady a frightened man. It says as much about Gideon's smallness as about Midian's fall.

A word from the enemy's camp

The encouragement comes from a man in the opposing army, and his companion gives the meaning.

One of the army of Midian had a dream, and Gideon is allowed to hear him tell it to his friend. It is simple almost to the point of being crude... His companion interprets it in plain words: "This is no other than the sword of Gideon the son of Joash, a man of Israel; God has given into his hand Midian and all the camp." So from the lips of the enemy he receives God's assurance that the whole movement will succeed.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God has often spoken this way, and not only to His own people.

There is plenty of evidence in the Scriptures that God often made His mind known to people through dreams. He did this not only with those who obeyed Him, but also with those outside Israel. Gen. 20:3, 6; Judges 7:13.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why barley bread

The kind of grain in the dream carries the message.

Barley bread, because of its coarseness, was the food of the poorest peasants only... The Midianite's dream of a cake of barley bread rolling into the camp was a vivid picture of how desperate the starving, poverty-stricken Israelites had become. Yet by the Lord's help the despised cake overturned the tent of the oppressor (Judges 7:13).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer draws attention to what the dream did not show — no weapon appears in it at all.

Barley bread is the poorest of all foods — the food of paupers. So it suggested poverty and feebleness — the very lessons stressed all along. The fact, too, that it was food and not a sword that was to overthrow Midian is significant. When the people of God are feeding on Christ, they are getting a sword for the enemy. God can use even our feeble and partial understanding of Christ as a most effective weapon.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Comfort that leaves no room for pride

God answers Gideon's fear, but the answer costs him something.

Divine encouragement is never given to puff up the flesh. Anything of pride and self-importance must have been badly wounded. God shows His favoured servant what is coming: he will strike down the Midianites as one man. Even so, He makes him feel that in himself he is only a "cake of barley bread."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the enemy fears

What frightens the enemy is not Israel's strength.

Nothing strikes such terror into the heart of the enemy as a sense of weakness among God's people... So this cake of barley bread, awkward as the comparison seems, testifies of God at work and of man's utter helplessness... No wonder Gideon could take courage. Even from the mouth of his enemies he learns how weak God's people are. A weakness that has thrown them on Him is a pledge of His victory. If I am strong, then Satan only has myself to deal with. If I am weak and cast on God, it is another matter.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The barley loaf as a picture of Christians

The same writer who saw Gideon humbled by the image turns it on the reader.

If Christians lost their worldliness and were more like the cake of barley bread — the plainest thing possible — the world would stand more in fear of them. We have dressed ourselves in the world's trappings and wanted its respectability. So it thinks we have to go to it for help... Let us settle down quietly into simple, God-fearing, God-acknowledging Christianity. Then, though we look like a plain cake of barley bread, the world would feel about us as the Midianite speaks of Gideon to his friend.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

From dream to worship

What Gideon heard sent him back a different man.

He hears how his enemies already count on their own defeat... These hints are given to us with a purpose, and that purpose is to encourage us to press on more boldly. Gideon was greatly encouraged by this. The God of the dew was again brought near to him, and he worshipped, and went back in full assurance of victory before the fight had even begun.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear — God met Gideon's fear at the enemy's campfire. The assurance he needed came from the mouth of the enemy himself.

- Barley — the poorest loaf, the food of paupers. It stood for the poverty and weakness of Israel.

- Humbling — the comfort came in a form that wounded pride. God promised Gideon the victory, then showed him he was only a barley cake.

- Terror — a sense of weakness in God's people is what alarms the enemy. Weakness casts them on God, and that is a pledge of His victory.

- Worship — Gideon heard the dream and worshipped. He went back to camp sure of the outcome before the battle started.

Judges 7:14 · Darby

And his fellow answered and said, This is nothing else save the sword of Gideon the son of Joash, the man of Israel God hath given into his hand Midian and all the host.

Before the battle, God sends Gideon down to the edge of the enemy camp. There a Midianite soldier explains a dream about a loaf of barley bread — and the explanation hands Gideon the whole army before a single trumpet sounds.

God's message through enemy lips

This word of assurance does not come to Gideon in private. It comes out of the camp he is about to attack.

The message comes from God Himself, spoken through the lips of the enemy. Gideon had been learning the lesson of weakness in his own soul. That same lesson struck terror into the hearts of his enemies. … If I am strong, it is simply myself that Satan has to meet. If I am weak and cast upon God, it is another matter. Satan knows then whom he has to meet — the Lord of hosts.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A portrait drawn by a Midianite

The dream did not flatter Gideon. The soldier calls him a sword, but the picture is a loaf of coarse bread.

Then God placed him in front of the enemy, who lay in the valley like locusts for number. Through the mouth of one of them He drew Gideon's portrait. This mighty man of valour was compared to a cake of barley bread — coarse, homely food — and this was "the sword of Gideon"! A fine sort of sword to strike down such a multitude! But in reality the sword of Gideon was "the sword of Jehovah" (v. 20), and that is where the power lay.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same message that steadied Gideon also humbled him:

Divine encouragement never puffs up the flesh. Anything of pride and self-importance must have been badly wounded. God shows His favoured servant what is about to happen: he will strike the Midianites as one man. Yet God makes him feel that in himself he is only a "cake of barley bread."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Bread called a sword

The dreamer saw bread; his friend said "sword." The two images look like a mismatch.

"Bread" and a "sword" seem the most mismatched figures; and yet both are figures of the word of God. And barley bread is the bread of the poorest. It may here speak of that word as its despisers rate it, or more likely of even its simplest and lowest truths. For what more than these is needed against Midian and Amalek, that is, the world and the lusts of the flesh, as they break in here on the Church of God?

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The choice of barley says something about the people God uses:

Barley bread is the poorest of all foods — the food of the destitute. So it suggested poverty and feebleness, the very lessons stressed all along. It matters, too, that food and not a sword was to overthrow Midian. When the people of God are feeding on Christ, they are getting a sword for the enemy. God can use even our weak and partial grasp of Christ as a highly effective weapon.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An enemy already beaten

The verse ends in the past tense: God has already handed Midian over. That tells Gideon the true state of the army in front of him.

Gideon learned to know himself, but God also revealed to him the moral state of the enemy he was called to face. It was a defeated foe. "God has given into his hand Midian and all the camp," said the Midianite to his fellow (v. 14). May we understand this truth better in connection with our three enemies — the flesh, the world and Satan. The flesh is crucified, the world is overcome, Satan is judged. This fills us with courage in front of them. Gideon grasped all this, and worshipped.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Commentators differ over what the barley cake pictures. Some see Gideon's own weakness; others see the plainest truths of God's word. One writer looks past the bread to the sword:

And then we read of this barley loaf: "This is no other than the sword of Gideon" (Judges 7:14). This sword of Gideon shows us that the Lord has conquered the enemy and the world. Here Gideon becomes a type of the Lord Jesus.

Modernised from Max BilleterOriginal wording

What the world fears

If a barley cake is what frightened Midian, then respectability is not our strength.

Is there not instruction for us in this? Suppose Christians were stripped of their worldliness, and were more truly like the "cake of barley bread" — the plainest thing imaginable. Then the world would fear them more. We have dressed ourselves in its trappings and wanted its respectability, so it assumes we must come to it for help. … Let us quietly settle down into simple, God-fearing, God-acknowledging Christianity. Then, though outwardly only a cake of barley bread, the world would feel about us as the Midianite spoke of Gideon to his friend.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Bread — God pictured His servant as the cheapest food there was: coarse barley, not steel.

- Portrait — an enemy spoke Gideon's own likeness. God's encouragement lifted his courage and wounded his pride.

- Sword — bread and sword are one picture. Feeding on Christ and on the plainest truths of God's word is the weapon against the world and the flesh.

- Already given — the Midianite spoke of a victory God had already granted. The flesh is crucified, the world overcome, Satan judged.

- Worship — Gideon worshipped before the battle began. A people content to look like barley bread are the people the world learns to fear.

Judges 7:15 · Darby

And it came to pass when Gideon heard the telling of the dream and its interpretation, that he worshipped. And he returned into the camp of Israel, and said, Arise; for Jehovah hath given into your hand the camp of Midian.

At night Gideon crept to the edge of the enemy camp. There he overheard a stranger's dream about a barley loaf, and a friend's reading of it. What he does next is the surprise: he bows down in worship, and only then calls his men to arms.

Worship comes before the fighting

Gideon worships while the Midianite army is still untouched.

Before he goes to battle, he worships in the full confidence of victory. The worship of faith is always the worship of confidence. If we were more truly, in our own eyes, the "cake of barley bread," there would be more abounding praise.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Good news tends to send us hurrying off to enjoy it.

Blessings tend, because of what we are, to lift us up; and we run off with them to enjoy them, and forget God. Trouble brings us to our knees. It is good when our blessings also have this effect. See the beautiful example of this in Gideon (Judges 7:15). He did not rush off elated to tell the hosts of Israel the cheering news he had heard, but first worshipped.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The encouragement that humbles

Gideon heard himself described as a barley loaf — the cheapest bread there was.

Divine encouragement is never to the puffing up of the flesh. It must have cut deeply into any pride and self-importance. God shows His favoured servant what is coming to pass, and that he will strike the Midianites as one man. At the same time He makes him feel that in himself he is only a "cake of barley bread."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The dream showed Gideon how his people looked in enemy eyes. Another writer says that view is exactly what terrifies an enemy.

Nothing strikes such terror into the heart of the enemy as seeing a sense of weakness among God's people. Here is what speaks of the greatest poverty, of the greatest weakness — barley. And it is a loaf of barley bread, tossed over into the camp, that is going to destroy the whole power of the enemy. No wonder Gideon could take courage when he learned from his enemies' own mouths that God's people are weak. A weakness that has thrown them upon Him is a pledge of His victory. If I am strong, then Satan only has myself to meet. If I am weak and thrown upon God, it is another matter. Little wonder that Gideon bows in worship as he sees this clearly.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

"Into your hand" — the self that drops out

Speaking to the camp, Gideon changes one small word.

Here again there is the setting aside of self. He does not say "into my hand," but "into your hand." The Lord had said "into your hand" (v. 9), and the Midianite "into his hand" (v. 14).

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The men he calls to arms number three hundred. Where the ESV says he returned to "the camp of Israel," older translations read "the host of Israel."

What is this "host of Israel"? Three hundred men! The Midianites are as many as grasshoppers, and the LORD's "host" is only a handful of men! It is most important to see the dignity attached to the three hundred. God reckons not according to what we are in ourselves, but according to what He makes us.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the three hundred carry

Gideon then arms the three hundred — but not with weapons.

Full of joy and confidence, Gideon returned to the camp of Israel and told the men to rise. Then he divided the three hundred into three companies. He "put a trumpet in every man's hand, with empty pitchers, and lamps within the pitchers." These three things represent the principles of God's testimony in the struggle with Satan and the world.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

So what broke Midian's army?

It was not their skill, nor their strength, but their testimony that God used. They testified loudly to the LORD's mission, the LORD's will, and the LORD's delivering of the Midianites into their hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. God's encouragement reached Gideon through an enemy's dream. It came in the shape of a barley loaf — the plainest bread there was.

- Humbled. God's encouragement never puffs us up. It made Gideon feel he was nothing in himself — and that sense of weakness is what the enemy dreads most.

- Worshipped. He bowed before the fight, not after it — the worship of faith is worship that is already sure of the outcome.

- Handed over. Rising from worship he says "your hand," not "my hand." Self drops out, and God gives three hundred men the dignity of His own host.

- Sounded. What they carry is trumpet, pitcher and lamp — testimony, not weaponry — and that is what routs Midian.

Judges 7:16 · Darby

And he divided the three hundred men into three companies, and he put a trumpet in every man's hand, and empty pitchers, and torches within the pitchers.

Gideon sends three hundred men into battle with no sword, no spear and no shield. Each man carries a trumpet, a clay jar, and a torch hidden inside. Commentators read this strange kit as a picture of how God works with His people. Why arm them like this, and why does the light stay hidden at first?

Weapons that look useless

By any military standard the kit makes no sense.

The weapons of their warfare were the most foolish things imaginable — trumpets, pitchers, and lamps in the pitchers! Faith's weapons must be mighty through God alone.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Even the small band is split again before the fight begins.

Gideon divided these three hundred men into three companies — as if even that number was too great to be trusted together. They were all armed alike, and in a strange way. They had no sword, no bow, no spear. In one hand they held only pitchers, earthen vessels with a light hidden inside. In the other hand they held a trumpet that was to sound out the note of victory.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Three items, three principles

Rossier reads the trumpet, the jar and the lamp as one picture of witness.

If the trumpets represent the word of God in testimony, and the pitchers represent ourselves, what are the lamps but the life of Jesus, the light of Christ? The first two only serve to show the third in the surrounding darkness. Gideon's men blew the trumpets, and broke the pitchers, and the light shone out all about them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The trumpet's four uses

Israel's trumpets had four uses, and battle was only one of them.

We find the use of the trumpets detailed in Numbers 10:1-10. They were the voice of God, telling the people His mind on four important occasions. They gave the signal for gathering the people together, for the journeying of the camps, for battle, and also for the solemn feasts or worship. What the sound of the trumpets once meant for Israel, we now find in the word of God, in another and very precious way. By it God speaks to us. It regulates and directs the gathering together, the walk, the warfare, and the worship of the children of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Empty jars, but not left empty

The verse calls the jars empty, but Gideon does not leave them that way.

Notice that the pitchers had been empty, but Gideon put the lights — the brands or torches — inside. This helps us understand the treasure in the earthen vessels that Paul speaks of. From the context, it is clearly the knowledge of the glory of God. God had caused that glory to shine in our hearts, displayed in the face of the glorified Christ. But once we receive it, by the working of sovereign power and grace, it does not come and go. It remains as a lasting possession.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Rossier looks at what the jars themselves were worth:

The empty pitchers were probably some of the containers that had held the people's food. Now empty and worthless, they were only fit to be broken. When God raises up a testimony, He only glorifies Himself in instruments which He has broken.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the light is hidden first

A lamp sealed inside pottery gives no light at all.

Here you have the pitcher whole, with the light down inside it — and so the pitcher hides the light. There is nothing to do but break the pitcher. Then the light shines out unhindered. And you can understand that the more valuable the pitcher is, the less likely it is to be broken.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God, not us, does the breaking — and that is a comfort, not a threat.

Now, I do not have to break the pitcher, blessed be God for that. That is God's part. He will break the pitcher — be sure of that. If you are walking with God, you are certain to be in His mind when He breaks it. And take care that you do not put something else in the way to stop the light from shining.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

The vessel is not the light

The Christian's Friend names the two weapons we fight with now.

Now, the weapons we have to fight with are testimony by word of mouth and our own insignificance. Our power is in giving testimony to Jesus. We must never leave the place of being only "earthen vessels." Remember: the vessel only contains the light. Let us not pretend that it is the light.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Trumpet — the voice of God. In Numbers 10 it gathered, guided, and called to battle and worship. The word of God does all four for His people now.

- Vessel — the jars were empty and worthless in themselves. God still used them, and He glorifies Himself only in instruments He has broken.

- Lamp — the treasure inside is the knowledge of God's glory in the face of Christ. It stays there as a lasting possession.

- Breaking — a whole jar hides its own light. God Himself breaks it. The more we prize the vessel, the harder we resist.

- Victory — no sword, bow or spear. The weapons look foolish on purpose, so that the power is God's alone. Never confuse the vessel with the light.

Judges 7:17 · Darby

And he said to them, Look on me, and do likewise; behold, when I come to the extremity of the camp, it shall be that, as I do, so shall ye do.

Gideon's three hundred men stand in the dark above a valley packed with the army of Midian. They carry no swords — only trumpets, clay jars and torches hidden inside — and their leader gives them one order: watch me, and copy me.

A leader who shows, not only tells

The order is simple. Gideon gives his men no plan to follow, only a person to copy.

Then Gideon told them to look at him and to do as he did. What a lovely picture of having Christ as our true leader! He does not only tell us what to do: He shows us by His own example, and we need only to follow Him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The eye fixed on one object

Copying a leader in the dark only works if you never look away from him. One writer makes this the way a Christian knows what to do from moment to moment.

To know what to do at any given moment, we must have the "single eye." When Gideon was about to attack the Midianites, he said to his followers, "Look at me, and do likewise." So it must be now with the Christian. He must look on Christ so that he may do what he sees Him doing. His eye must be on Christ alone, seeing nothing but Christ, desiring nothing but His mind and His glory.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What they saw him do

The command is empty until you know what the model does. Gideon sounded his trumpet and smashed the jar in his own hand.

Gideon blew his trumpet and broke his own pitcher at the same time. He commanded his companions to do the things they had "heard and seen" in their leader. As soon as they obeyed the word and followed his example, their enemies fled and they won a great victory. Breaking the pitchers mattered just as much as blowing the trumpet. Until they broke them, the pitchers hid the light inside; then the light shone out.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Equipment that makes no military sense

Three hundred men went out against an army with no sword in hand. Their equipment was itself the lesson.

The weapons of their warfare were the most foolish things imaginable — trumpets, pitchers, and lamps in the pitchers! Faith's weapons must be mighty through God alone.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the jar has to be smashed

A whole jar hides the flame it carries. One writer applies the breaking to self.

This self has now become the recipient of the grace of divine light. God has shined into the heart — now what are you to do? It is a question between the light that has shined in, and the vessel that contains the light and may hinder it from shining out. The vessel has received the light. That is what grace has done, and the same grace shows itself through a broken vessel.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same writer weighs the jar's value against the treasure inside it.

The only way to let the light shine out is to break the pitcher. And you can understand that the more valuable the pitcher is, the less likely it is to be broken. And the more you realise that it is an earthen vessel in which you hold the treasure, the more ready you will be to break it, so that the treasure may be shown.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Trumpet and light belong together

Each man carried a trumpet and a torch. God asks for both.

God does not want the trumpet testimony and darkness. He wants the testimony accompanied by light. He does not want words only. It makes no difference how powerful the words are, how true and clear they are, or what trumpet ring of victory they carry. He wants more than words. He wants the broken vessel, so that the light may come to the front.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The outcome of simple imitation

They did what they had seen their leader do.

They came in the middle of the night, just after the changing of the watch. They blew the trumpets and broke the pitchers, so the torches showed. So 300 lights suddenly appeared around the camp of Midian. The Midianites rushed from their tents, and the sound of the trumpets and the sight of the lights threw them into confusion.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Look — the order is not a plan but a person; the leader goes first and the followers copy what they see.

- Look only — the eye must be fixed on Christ alone, seeing nothing else and wanting nothing else.

- Break — Gideon smashed his own jar; the light cannot shine while the vessel stays whole.

- Blow — trumpet and light go together; God wants testimony carried by a broken life, not words alone.

- Stand — foolish weapons in obedient hands put a whole army to flight, because faith's weapons are strong through God alone.

Judges 7:18 · Darby

And when I blow with a trumpet, I and all that are with me, ye also shall blow the trumpets around the whole camp, and shall say, For Jehovah and for Gideon!

Gideon's three hundred men stand in the dark around a camp too big to count. Their orders are not to charge, but to watch, blow, and shout — so what is the real weapon here?

(Older translations read the shout as "The sword of the LORD and of Gideon," and use "Jehovah" for "the LORD." The writers below follow that older wording.)

Look on me, and do likewise

Before he tells them what to shout, Gideon tells them to watch him. One writer hears the Lord Jesus in those words.

A little later he says, "Look on me, and do likewise" (verse 17). In this expression Gideon foreshadows the Lord Jesus. Our Lord says to us today: "Look on me, and do likewise."

Modernised from Max BilleterOriginal wording

What the trumpet was for

The trumpet was not a noise-maker. Israel's law had already fixed its use, and battle was only one of the four things it called men to.

We find the use of the trumpets detailed in Numbers 10:1-10. They were the voice of God, telling the people His mind on four important occasions. They gave the signal to gather the people, to move the camps, to go to battle, and to keep the solemn feasts or worship. What the sound of the trumpets once meant for Israel, we find today in the word of God, in another and very precious way. By it God speaks to us. It regulates and directs how the children of God gather together, walk, fight, and worship.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Weapons that look like nothing

Trumpets, clay jars, and torches are not an arsenal. By any military measure the equipment is absurd, and that is the point.

The weapons of their warfare were the most foolish things imaginable: trumpets, pitchers, and lamps in the pitchers! Faith's weapons must be mighty through God alone.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Notice what the men are not carrying. They do not swing a sword here. They speak one.

The thought throughout is the stripping away of one thing after another, taking from him one prop after another. In the end he and the little band with him face that mighty host that covers the whole face of the earth. He is left with the three hundred, and not even a sword in their hands, only a sword on their lips. They have the trumpets and the torches, and that cry, "The sword of the Lord and of Gideon." The sword here is a spoken sword, not a sword in their hands.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Two names in one cry

The shout puts the Lord's name first and Gideon's second. One writer says God led Gideon a long road before he could say it.

God led His servant along a long road of testing to the final victory. The many details are full of interest and instruction, but we must pass over them today. It is enough to say this: all God taught him brought him at last to a conquering faith. He could link his name with God's and cry, "The sword of the Lord and of Gideon." His whole thought and purpose was one with the Lord's. He was like that other good soldier who could say, "The testimony of the Lord, and of me His prisoner."

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

On every side of the camp

Gideon's company blows first, and every other man answers from his own place. One writer turns that into direct instruction for us.

The three hundred stood, every man in his place around the camp, and cried: "The sword of Jehovah, and of Gideon!" This simple cry puts the world to rout! Bear testimony to Christ. Live Christ, taking no account of self. Let the two-edged sword of the Lord be your weapon. Then all the power of Satan and of the world will be unable to resist you.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Look — Gideon's first order is not "attack" but "watch me." One writer hears Christ saying the same words to us today.

- Sound — the trumpet was God's voice for gathering, marching, fighting, and worship. Today His word does all four.

- Weapons — jars, torches and horns are the most foolish equipment imaginable. Faith's weapons are mighty through God alone.

- Sword — there is no blade in a single hand; the sword is on their lips, spoken, not swung.

- Name — the cry joins the servant's name to the Lord's, because his whole purpose has become one with His. Three hundred voices call it out, and the camp breaks.

Judges 7:19 · Darby

And Gideon, and the hundred men that were with him, came to the outside of the camp in the beginning of the middle watch; and they had but newly set the watch; and they blew the trumpets, and broke the pitchers that were in their hands.

In the dark, Gideon and a hundred men reach the edge of the Midianite camp, with three hundred ringing it in all. Not one carries a sword — only a trumpet and a clay jar with a torch inside, which raises two questions: why this hour, and why these weapons?

The hour God chose

The verse fixes the moment. Israel counted the night in watches, and this one had a set span:

The middle watch, from 10 P.M. to 2 A.M.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The sentries had only just changed, so the freshest guards were the ones caught off guard. Then Midian's own swords did the fighting:

They came in the middle of the night, just after the changing of the watch. They blew the trumpets and broke the jars, and the torches shone out. So 300 lights suddenly appeared around the camp of Midian. The Midianites rushed from their tents. They heard the trumpets and saw the lights, and fell into confusion. They thought the enemy had got inside their camp, so they struck out with their swords at others who had swarmed out of their tents.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Weapons that make no military sense

Nothing in Gideon's equipment could wound anybody:

The weapons they fought with were the most foolish things imaginable — trumpets, jars, and lamps inside the jars! Faith's weapons must be mighty through God alone.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The trumpet: the voice of God

The trumpet was not just noise. Israel's law had already fixed what its blasts meant:

They were the voice of God, telling the people His mind on four important occasions. They gave the signal to gather the people together, to move the camps, to go to battle, and also for the solemn feasts or worship. What the sound of the trumpets once meant for Israel, we now have in another and very precious way, in the word of God. By it God speaks to us. It regulates and directs the gathering together, the walk, the warfare, and the worship of the children of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Each man carried two things at once. One writer takes them as two kinds of witness:

Now, let us take the trumpet as a figure of the testimony of the lip, and the torch as a figure of the testimony of the life. And both of these forms of witness are necessary to fight the "good fight" of faith.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Why the jar had to break

The jars were ordinary containers, worth nothing once emptied. Why smash them? Because of how God works:

Empty jars represented what Gideon and his warriors were in themselves. Like Paul's earthen vessel, these empty jars were only fit to be broken. When God raises up a testimony, He glorifies Himself only in instruments He has broken.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Only a broken jar lets the light out. One writer turns that on the Christian:

What a strange way to fight — and how full of instruction for us! We too have to bear testimony, not of ourselves, but of Christ, as they blew the trumpets. We too must have death working in us, if there is to be life in those we serve, and the earthen vessels must break. That is how the light can shine out brightly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Every man where he was told

A plan like this falls apart if one man moves early or wanders off:

Every man could be trusted to stand where he was told, and to do what he was told, even in the darkness of midnight and at the edge of the enemy's camp. Unquestioning obedience like this was needed to carry out the unusual kind of attack the Lord planned for them to make on the invaders.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

So what won the battle?

God used not their skill and not their strength, but their testimony — their loud testimony to the Lord's mission, the Lord's will, and the Lord's handing of the Midianites over into their hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The trumpet, the jar and the torch still shape a witness today:

Bear testimony to Christ. Live Christ, taking no account of self. Let the two-edged sword of the Lord be your weapon, and all the power of Satan and of the world will be unable to resist you. Despite the broken jars, they found their safety and strength in the trumpets of Israel, whose notes were so piercing, and in the lamps of God, whose light was so bright.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Timing — The attack came in the middle watch, just after fresh guards took their posts. Surprise, not strength, opened the battle.

- Weapons — Trumpets, jars and torches were the most foolish weapons imaginable. That is why the victory belongs to God alone.

- Voice — The trumpet stands for the word of God. It directs how His people gather, walk, fight and worship.

- Breaking — The torch only showed when the jar broke. God glorifies Himself in instruments He has broken.

- Place — Three hundred men stood where they were told. They lifted lip and life together, and routed an army they never touched.

Judges 7:20 · Darby

And the three companies blew the trumpets, and broke in pieces the pitchers, and held the torches in their left hand, and the trumpets in their right hand for blowing, and cried, The sword of Jehovah and of Gideon!

This verse carries out the plan of the verses before it: in the dark, three companies blow the trumpets, smash their jars and shout. Not one of the three hundred men holds a weapon — a torch fills one hand and a trumpet the other.

Weapons that were no weapons

The whole chapter has taken things away from Gideon, until he has nothing left to fight with. One writer counts what the three hundred still had in their hands. (The commentators quote an older translation of the cry: "The sword of the LORD and of Gideon.")

The thought throughout is stripping off one thing after another, robbing him of one prop after another. At last he stands with the little band that is with him, facing that mighty host that covers the whole face of the earth. He is left with the three hundred, and not even a sword in their hands, only a sword on their lips. They have the trumpets and the torches, and that cry, "The sword of the LORD and of Gideon." The sword is a spoken sword, not a sword in their hands.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Testimony, not skill

The men blew, but the power was not in them. One writer turns that into a lesson for us.

Strange way of fighting this — and how full of instruction for us! We too have to bear testimony, not of ourselves, but of Christ, as they blew the trumpets. We too must have death working in us, if life is to work in those we serve, and the earthen vessels breaking. That is how the light can shine out brightly… God did not use their skill or their strength, but their testimony — their loud testimony of the LORD's mission, the LORD's will, and the LORD's giving of the Midianites into their hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the jars had to break

The trumpets, the jars and the lamps make one testimony. One writer gives each part its meaning.

Of what use were these empty jars? To hold the lamps, the third and most important part of testimony for God… If, in testimony, the trumpets stand for the word of God, and the jars for ourselves, what are the lamps but the life of Jesus, the light of Christ? The first two only serve to make the third visible in the darkness around them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Commentators differ on whose hand does the breaking. Some leave that work with God:

Now, I do not have to break the jar, blessed be God for that. That is God's part. But He will break it, be sure of that. And if you are walking with God, you are certain to be in His mind when He breaks it.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

Others press it as a choice faith makes now, and warn against the half-measure of setting self carefully aside for later use:

The best and most effective way is not to take your light out, so to speak, and set the jar carefully to one side to use again. It is to break the jar, and that is the end of it. That is what faith will do.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Two names in one cry

Gideon had heard the enemy compare him to a loaf of barley bread. That picture makes the shout of this verse striking.

The enemy compared this mighty man of valour to a cake of barley bread, coarse and plain food — and this was "the sword of Gideon"! A fine sword indeed to strike this huge army with! But in reality the sword of Gideon was "the sword of the LORD," and that was where the power lay.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The joining of the two names is the end of a long training, not a boast at the start of one.

As a result of all that God taught him, he was able at last, in conquering faith, to link his name with God's, and to cry, "The sword of the LORD and of Gideon." His whole thought and purpose was bound up and one with the Lord's, like that other good soldier who could say, "The testimony of the Lord, and of me His prisoner."

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The same equipment today

One writer names the two weapons we fight with now, and adds a warning.

Now the weapons we have to fight with are testimony by word of mouth and our own insignificance. Our power is in giving testimony to Jesus. It lies in never leaving the place of being only "earthen vessels." Remember that the vessel only holds the light. Let us not pretend that it is the light.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Stripped: God took away every prop. Three hundred men faced a vast army with no sword in their hands — only a sword on their lips.

- Sounded: The trumpet was testimony, not talent. God used their loud witness to Him, not their skill.

- Broken: The jar held the light but also hid it, so it had to break. Commentators differ on whether God breaks it or faith breaks it now.

- Shining: Trumpets picture the word of God, jars picture us, lamps the life of Jesus. The first two exist to make the third visible in the dark.

- Shared: The cry joins two names, but the power was the Lord's. The man He used was only a barley loaf.

Judges 7:21 · Darby

And they stood every man in his place round about the camp; and all the host ran, and cried out, and fled.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 7:22 · Darby

And the three hundred blew the trumpets, and Jehovah set every man's sword against his fellow, even throughout the camp. And the host fled to Beth-shittah towards Zererah, to the border of Abel-meholah, by Tabbath.

The three hundred never drew a sword. They blew their trumpets and stood still, while the huge Midianite army tore itself apart in the dark.

What happened inside the camp

One writer retells the night attack that turned Midian's army on itself.

They came in the middle of the night, just after the changing of the watch. They blew the trumpets and broke the pitchers, uncovering the torches. So 300 lights suddenly appeared around the camp of Midian. The Midianites rushed from their tents. They heard the trumpets, saw the lights, and fell into confusion. They thought the enemy had got inside their camp. So they lashed out with their swords at other men who had swarmed out of the tents. So the Lord set every man's sword against his own companions, and the whole army fled.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The places named in the verse mark the line of that flight, running down toward the Jordan valley.

Bethshittah. Place near the Jordan valley. Judges 7:22.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Not skill, but testimony

The men did no fighting. What God used was the noise they made about Him.

The war-cry went up: "The sword of the Lord, and of Gideon." Each man stood in his place around the camp. The whole army ran, cried out, and fled. And the three hundred blew their trumpets. It was not their skill or their strength that was used. It was their testimony — their loud testimony to the Lord's mission, the Lord's will, and the Lord's handing over of the Midianites into their hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The pitchers had to break

The jars were only fit to be smashed. Writers see in this God's pattern with everyone He uses.

Empty pitchers represented what Gideon and his warriors were in themselves. Their leader had just learned this lesson in the camp of Midian. The three hundred had to learn it too, each one for himself. Like Paul's earthen vessel, these empty pitchers were only fit to be broken. When God raises up a testimony, He glorifies Himself only in instruments He has broken. He carried His gospel to the nations by a Saul whom He had first cast down in the dust on the road to Damascus.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer names the weapons we fight with, and warns about who gets the credit.

The weapons we fight with are testimony by word of mouth and our own insignificance. Our power is in giving testimony to Jesus. We must never get out of the place of being only "earthen vessels." We must remember that the vessel only holds the light; let us not pretend that it is the light. The surpassing power must be of God and not of us.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Trumpet and lamp — word and life

Each man carried a trumpet and a torch. One writer reads them as the two halves of any real witness.

Let us take the trumpet as a figure of the testimony of the lip, and the torch as a figure of the testimony of the life. Both of these forms of witness are needed to fight the "good fight" of faith.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Of the three items, the light is the one that matters.

In this testimony the trumpets represent the word of God, and the pitchers represent ourselves. What then are the lamps but the life of Jesus, the light of Christ? The first two only serve to make the third visible in the surrounding darkness... It is God Himself who takes care to break the vessels, "so that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our mortal flesh."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A pattern God repeats

One writer sees this same night repeated in a day still ahead.

A panic — that is the force of the word "tumult" — will seize the nations besieging Jerusalem. It will be like the panic that fell on the Midianites when Gideon and his three hundred men attacked. It will be like the one that came on the army of Ammon, Moab and Edom as they advanced against Judah in the days of Jehoshaphat. The huge army will melt away and destroy itself.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The few draw in the many

The rout did not stay with the three hundred.

It is encouraging that testimony breeds testimony. The three hundred were used to reunite the people. The men of Israel gathered and pursued Midian. All the men of Ephraim came, joined the chase, and shared in the spoil. We shall see this result if we are faithful.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Testimony, not swords. God did not use fighting skill. He used three hundred men who stood still and bore loud witness to Him.

- Testimony breaks the vessel. The jars were only fit to be smashed. God glorifies Himself in instruments He has broken, so the credit cannot land on them.

- Testimony has two halves. The trumpet is witness by the lip, the lamp is witness by the life — and the light shines only once the vessel gives way.

- Testimony routs the enemy. God turned Midian's swords on Midian. Writers expect the same panic on the nations besieging Jerusalem, whose army will melt away.

- Testimony spreads. The few who stood in place drew the rest of Israel into the chase. Testimony breeds testimony.

Judges 7:23 · Darby

And the men of Israel were called together out of Naphtali, and out of Asher, and out of all Manasseh, and pursued after Midian.

The three hundred have already won: they blew their trumpets, broke their jars, and watched Midian turn its swords on itself. Now the tribes who missed that night come out to chase a beaten army — so what share do the many have in a victory God gave to a few?

Victory First, Numbers After

Kelly notes the order of events. Faith acts first; numbers arrive later.

But if faith does not wait for numbers, nor rest on them in the battles of the Lord, others follow when the enemy has received a clear defeat.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why They Were Not in the Battle

Most of these men had been in Gideon's camp. God sent them home on purpose. Darby ties that sifting to the question of who gets the credit.

But ten thousand men are still too many. Jehovah's hand alone must be seen. Only those may remain who do not stop to drink at their ease. They refresh themselves in haste, as the chance comes, more taken up with the fight than with their own comfort along the way. This was what Israel needed: Jehovah must have His place in their hearts and in their faith. And it fitted the just judgment of God in Israel that, as far as their part in the work went, they had no share in its glory.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Profiting by Another's Faith

So the men of Naphtali, Asher and Manasseh come out to a fight that is already decided. Darby asks who really won it, and what the crowd's part in it was.

It is Jehovah who does everything. The trumpets and the lamps alone announce His presence, and that of His servant Gideon. The crowd of Israel pursue the enemy. They profit by the work of faith, though they have no faith themselves — the usual result of such a movement.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Leader Who Will Not Hoard the Credit

Gideon could have kept the win for himself and his three hundred. Instead he sends word to Ephraim and widens the circle.

The people flock to the victory, just as they will, whenever individual faith has opened the way, and it is a comfort to think that this is the case. We saw the same in Ehud's case: he blew a trumpet, and Israel gathered after him. But first he had to kill the king of Moab alone. So here, once the battle is won and the enemy is in flight, the rest of Israel gather and join the pursuit. Gideon in fact sends messengers to show that he does not want the credit, if we may use that word, of the victory for himself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Ridout also warns that a shared victory carries a cost.

We come next to something that, sadly, becomes all too common as the book of Judges goes on: the strife connected with the victory, and in a sense growing out of it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Finishing What the Three Hundred Started

The pursuit is not a victory lap. It is the practical work of finishing the rout — cutting the fleeing army off from water.

The enemy being routed, Israelites from Naphtali, Asher and Manasseh gathered and pursued the Midianites (v.23). Gideon also sent messengers throughout Ephraim. They were to bring their armies to help mop up, by taking from the enemy the watering places that matter so much to an army's welfare. In doing this they also captured and killed two princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb. They brought their heads to Gideon on the other side of Jordan.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Calling Others In, Without Setting Yourself Up

Darby draws the lesson for anyone who wants to call others into God's work.

We are powerless in ourselves for blessing, and we have found this out. But we have proved how good simple dependence on God is. So we can, like Gideon, call others to share with us. But let us not be setting up ourselves. Everything depends on the presence of the Holy Spirit, ungrieved, unhindered. Let this be told, and let us hide ourselves.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Few win. Faith does not wait for numbers; the three hundred acted while the rest of Israel was at home.

- Glory kept. God sent the larger army home so that His hand alone would show — and they had no share in the glory of the work.

- Many follow. Once Midian breaks, the crowd joins the pursuit and gains from a faith it did not have.

- Credit shared. Gideon widens the circle instead of guarding his honour — though strife often grows out of a victory.

- Work finished. The pursuit takes the water sources and the princes of Midian. A night's rout becomes a full deliverance.

Judges 7:24 · Darby

And Gideon sent messengers throughout mount Ephraim, saying, Come down against Midian, and take before them the waters unto Beth-barah, and the Jordan. And all the men of Ephraim were called together, and took the waters unto Beth-barah, and the Jordan.

Gideon's three hundred men have just broken the Midianite camp, but the enemy is still running. So Gideon sends messengers across the hill country of Ephraim with one order: take the water crossings before Midian can escape.

Faith Acts First, Numbers Follow

God had cut the army down to three hundred. Only after the win did the rest of Israel come running. One commentator marks the order:

Faith does not wait for numbers, and it does not lean on them in the battles of the Lord. But others follow once the enemy has clearly been beaten. Israel gathered from Naphtali, Asher and all Manasseh and chased Midian, and Gideon sent messengers throughout all the hill country of Ephraim — and so the victory was complete.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why The Water Crossings Mattered

Water was the one thing a fleeing army could not do without:

Gideon also sent messengers throughout Ephraim to bring their armies in to finish the work. They were to take from the enemy the watering places that an army needs so badly. In doing this they also captured and killed two princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb, then brought their heads to Gideon on the other side of Jordan.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Man Who Sent For Help

Gideon did not keep this victory to himself. One writer reads his motive in the sending:

Gideon sends messengers to show them that he does not want the credit of the victory himself. He sends messengers to Ephraim, to go down and take the crossings of the Jordan, so that they can wipe out the enemy completely.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One writer draws from that same invitation a lesson for anyone who has learned their own weakness:

We are powerless in ourselves to bring blessing, and we have found this out. But we have also proved how good it is to depend simply on God. So, like Gideon, we can call others into fellowship with us (v. 24, 25). But let us not set ourselves up. Everything depends on the presence of the Holy Spirit, ungrieved and unhindered. Let this be told, and let us hide ourselves.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Real Place, But Not The First Place

Ephraim had a real share in this victory, though not the leading share. One writer also finds meaning in the names of the two men they killed:

Ephraim is now called to take part in the fight. They answer the call and win a decisive battle. They take two princes of Midian — Oreb and Zeeb, the "Raven" and the "Wolf" — and bring their heads to Gideon, on the other side of Jordan. There is indeed a place for Ephraim in a fight like this, though it is not the first place. The spiritual meaning again throws light on the history. The names of the princes killed seem to show that they stand only for the rougher and lower of Israel's enemies — or the Church's; and the word used is the plain word "princes," not "kings."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Jealousy After The Victory

Jealousy followed the victory, and argument is not what answers it:

Here, Christian reader, is the true way to overcome jealous and envious brothers. The cake of barley bread and the empty pitcher can overcome jealous Ephraimites as well as hostile Midianites. A self-hiding spirit is the grand secret of victory over envy and jealousy, in all their hateful forms. It is difficult, if not impossible, to quarrel with a man who is down in the dust, in true self-abasement.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer turns the mirror on the complainers themselves:

Here is Ephraim, though: they are simply jealous, because God had used a more spiritual instrument than themselves. Jealousy is a proof that God cannot use you. If you are jealous of another, if you envy the spiritual state or spiritual power of another, it is just the proof that God cannot use you. You would not be jealous of another if God could use you. What jealousy should teach you first is to go down in the dust and own to God that you are not a faithful instrument. The man who envies his brothers should rather criticise himself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Pattern For A Later Day

Scripture later points back to this victory as a picture of one still to come:

Isaiah 10:26 shows that Gideon's victory over Midian at the rock of Oreb foreshadows the final victory over the Assyrian. In the same way, Barak's victory over Sisera at Megiddo pictures the final slaughter of the armies that will gather in the last days at Armageddon.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Few first. Faith does not wait for a crowd; the crowd arrives once God has already broken the enemy.

- Then many. Gideon refuses the credit and calls others in: take the waters, finish the job.

- Real work. The water crossings were the practical prize; holding them turned a rout into a complete victory.

- Second place. Ephraim's part was genuine but not first, and the two they killed were princes, not kings.

- Self hidden. The same self-emptiness that beat Midian also quiets envy: no one can quarrel with a man in the dust.

Judges 7:25 · Darby

And they took two princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb; and they slew Oreb upon the rock Oreb, and Zeeb they slew at the winepress of Zeeb; and they pursued Midian, and brought the heads of Oreb and Zeeb to Gideon beyond the Jordan.

Gideon's attack has scattered Midian, and the men of Ephraim now block the shallow crossings of the Jordan, where a fleeing army has to pass. The verse asks who owns a victory, and why two death sites were worth naming.

A victory handed round

Gideon does not keep the closing work for himself. He calls in the tribe that missed the night attack.

After the victory, with the enemy in flight, the rest of Israel gather together and join in the pursuit. Gideon, in fact, sends messengers to show them that he does not want the credit, if we may use that word, of the victory himself. He sends messengers to Ephraim. They are to go down and take the fords of Jordan, so that they may wipe out the enemy entirely.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One writer draws the line between calling others in and putting yourself forward:

We are powerless in ourselves for blessing, and we have found this out. But we have proved how good it is to depend on God alone. So we can, with Gideon, call on others to have fellowship with us. But let us not be setting up ourselves. Everything depends on the presence of the Holy Spirit, ungrieved and unhindered. Let this be told, and let us hide ourselves.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Raven and wolf

One writer reads the two names, and the two places where they died, as a picture:

The two princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb, were slain. Oreb means "raven" and Zeeb means "wolf." Oreb, the raven, is slain on the rock and Zeeb, the wolf, at the winepress. The raven is the bird that represents darkness and evil, so it is the type of corruption. The wolf is the destroyer of the sheep. The rock and the winepress are pictures of the Lord Jesus Christ and His Cross. There the victory over both was won.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why can a winepress stand for the cross? One writer traces it back to what a press produces:

The winepress reminds us of the blood of the grape, and of His blood that cleanses from all sin. It may well then suggest the cross, the winepress for Him. And this is indeed an effective shelter and hiding place for faith from all the power of the world. We take our place by the cross, and no Midianite dare dispute our position.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Princes, not kings

Ephraim comes into the fight late, and the men they kill are named by rank:

Ephraim is now called to take part in the contest, and they respond and win a decisive battle. There is indeed a place for Ephraim in such a contest as this, though it is not the first place. The spiritual meaning again lights up the history. The names of the princes slain seem to show that they represent only the ruder and lower of Israel's — or the Church's — enemies. According to the plain word, they are "princes," not "kings."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The place where the work told

The ground Ephraim held matters as much as the men they killed:

Nor is it wise or right to run down the work of Ephraim. Oreb and Zeeb — Raven and Wolf — the princes of Midian, had fallen at their hands at the fords of Jordan. These names suggest the destructive character of that world whose prince spares no one. But the fruits of the Spirit overcome the hosts of this world, and the principalities and powers who lead them. When works are in their true place — at the Jordan, the river of death — they do their work most effectively.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Their share in the win was real, but it did not keep them content:

The men of Ephraim are seen at the close of chapter 7 slaying Oreb and Zeeb. (They are allowed to come in for blessing as a result.) Now they turn and argue with Gideon for not having called them at the first.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The rock remembered

The rock kept the dead prince's name, and a prophet later took up that day:

In Isaiah 10:26, the victory of Gideon over Midian at the rock of Oreb foreshadows the final victory over the Assyrian. The victory of Barak over Sisera at Megiddo does the same. It pictures the final slaughter of the armies that will gather in the last days at Armageddon.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Shared, not hoarded. Gideon sends for Ephraim so the pursuit is not his own trophy. A man who has proved his own weakness can call others in without pushing himself forward.

- Named. Raven and Wolf mean corruption and the destroyer of sheep. They fall at a rock and a winepress — pictures of Christ and His cross.

- Ranked. They are princes, not kings — the coarser, lower enemies. Ephraim's place in the fight is real, but it is not the first place.

- Placed. Ephraim's work told at the fords of Jordan. Service done in its true place, at the river of death, does its work best.

- Remembered. The rock keeps Oreb's name, and Isaiah takes that day as the pattern of a final deliverance still ahead.

Judges 8:1 · Darby

And the men of Ephraim said to him, What is this thing thou hast done to us, that thou calledst us not, when thou wentest to fight with Midian? And they disputed with him sharply.

Opposition from friends

Midian had been routed, and the next battle Gideon faced came from inside Israel. One writer notes that this second kind of trouble is the harder of the two, and that Gideon handled it very differently from the way he handled outright hostility later in the chapter:

Once Midian was overcome, Gideon had to meet another difficulty of a different kind: the opposition of those who count as his friends. This opposition takes more wisdom to overcome than the opposition of open enemies. The men of Ephraim scold him for not calling them to the battle. With them he takes the lower place — the place of grace. That is the true, wise and godly position to hold toward those who want to be noticed. Gideon could have replied that God had specially called and chosen him and the three hundred; but he does not.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why Ephraim was angry

Ephraim's complaint was not about strategy. It grew out of a place of honour they had lost:

The men of Ephraim contended with Gideon. In Deborah's time they had held the place of honour (Judges 5:14). But since then there had been decline. Gideon, taught by God, had not summoned them, and they had fallen to second rank. This difference made them jealous of what the Lord had entrusted to their companions. They envied the energy of faith and its results in others. "What is this that you have done to us?" Ephraim, taken up with his own importance, thinks of himself instead of thinking of God. This is a frequent source of strife between believers. Such quarrels are far more painful and trying than conflict with the world.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer traces church quarrels to the same self-seeking, and names the cure:

The internal strife was born in selfishness. Ephraim scolded him sharply because he had not called them to the fight. Gideon's wise and gracious answer turned aside the threatening split. How beautifully it illustrates Philippians 2:1-5. All church quarrels begin with self-seeking vainglory. The remedy is "in humility count others more significant than yourselves."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"Why didn't you take us with you?"

One writer hears the same complaint today, and puts the fault on those who hung back:

This is just what the half-hearted Christian does. He is very angry at not being associated with those who are wholehearted. But whose fault is it? Whenever there is any energy of the Spirit of God working in the church, such people speak like the men of Ephraim: "Why not have taken us with you?" Faith's answer is very simple. "Because then we would have had to go on your ground. What we have to do is to go wherever the Lord leads. We cannot stop to make deals and agreements." No Christian has a right to stop on his way for another; he must go forward himself in individual faithfulness. The effort to drag others along with us is really only a device of Satan to keep ourselves back.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Gideon's answer

Gideon's reply grew out of a lesson God had already taught him:

God had made him understand that his courage and strength did not come from himself. He had also shown him that Gideon's sword, by itself, was worth as little as a loaf of barley bread. So in Ephraim's presence, the servant the Lord had used for this great deliverance took care not to speak of himself. He gave his attention to what God had done through his brothers. "What have I done now in comparison with you? Is not the gleaning of the grapes of Ephraim better than the grape harvest of Abiezer?" He took the lowest place and acknowledged the zeal for God they had shown. Let us act the same way. When we speak of our brothers, let us list not their failures but what God has worked in them.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What was at stake

Ephraim's pride broke out twice in this period, and the two outbursts ended differently:

As descendants of Joseph, Ephraim seems always to have aspired to leadership in the nation. Already in the time of the Judges that pride had twice broken out in haughty behaviour. Gideon's little band won a mighty victory over the Midianites. Then the men of Ephraim scolded him sharply for not calling them to the war, because they envied the fame of such a victory. Gideon's most gracious answer to their haughty scolding prevented a disaster (Judges 8:1-3). Later they scolded Jephthah even more haughtily, and that brought on Ephraim a terrible, though deserved, punishment (chapter 12:1-6).

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Pride starts it. Ephraim had slipped from the place of honour. Their question was jealousy of what God had entrusted to others.

- Friends wound deepest. Opposition from friends takes more wisdom to overcome than the attacks of open enemies.

- Half-heartedness complains. "Why not take us with you?" is the voice of those who would not go. Faith goes where the Lord leads and strikes no bargains.

- Humility disarms. Gideon did not defend himself. He named what God had done through his accusers, counting others more significant than himself.

- The outcome proves it. A gracious answer prevented disaster here. The same pride, met later by Jephthah, brought Ephraim a terrible punishment.

Judges 8:2 · Darby

And he said to them, What have I done now in comparison with you? Are not the gleanings of Ephraim better than the vintage of Abi-ezer?

Gideon has just crushed Midian with three hundred men. Now the tribe of Ephraim turns on him with sharp words for not calling them to the fight. His reply does not defend his own record. It praises theirs — and the question is why.

The Picture in the Words

Gideon answers with a picture from the vineyard. His reply rests on a rule in Israel's law about who gets the leftovers, and on the name of his own clan.

At the harvest and the grape harvest, the law strictly forbade owners to glean their own fields. They always had to leave what was left for the poor (Leviticus 19:9-10; Leviticus 23:22; Ruth 2:2-23). Gideon calmed Ephraim's anger by saying, "Is not the gleaning of the grapes of Ephraim better than the grape harvest of Abiezer?" Abiezer was Gideon's family name (Judges 8:2).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Gideon calls Ephraim's scraps a better crop than his own full harvest. One commentator points out that this was not mere flattery. It was true.

It is admirable to find a man who knows how to calm ruffled feelings. He does it even for those who did little to secure the victory. These men of Ephraim did help, and Gideon only said what was quite true. Everybody knows that an army loses far more men when the battle turns than while it rages. Only a few fall during the fighting itself. Once it becomes a flight, the dead may be very many.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the Quarrel Came From

Ephraim's complaint was not about strategy. They had held the front rank in an earlier generation, and losing it stung.

In Deborah's day they had held the place of honour (Judges 5:14). But since then there had been decline, and Gideon, taught by God, had not called them out. They had dropped to second rank. That difference made them jealous of what the Lord had entrusted to their companions. They were jealous of the energy of faith, and of what it produced in others. Ephraim, taken up with his own importance, thinks of himself instead of thinking of God. This is a frequent source of strife between believers. Such quarrels are far more painful and trying than conflict with the world.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer puts it more sharply. The men who complained had heard the same trumpet as everyone else.

All this was uncalled for and unworthy. Had they not heard the sound of the trumpet calling Israel to the battlefield? Had they not heard that the battle flag was flying? Why had they not rushed to the fight at the start? It was an easy thing to come in at the close and gather the spoil. It was easy then to find fault with the one who had been God's real instrument.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Weapon of a Lowered Place

Gideon could have argued his case. Instead he says nothing about himself. What silences the attack is not evidence but self-abasement.

Here is the true way to overcome jealous and envious brothers. The barley cake and the empty pitcher can defeat jealous Ephraimites as well as hostile Midianites. A self-hiding spirit is the great secret of victory over envy and jealousy in all their ugly forms. It is difficult, if not impossible, to quarrel with a man who is down in the dust in true self-abasement. "What have I done now in comparison with you?" That is the language of someone who had learned something of the real meaning of self-surrender.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

This is where Gideon's earlier training pays off, and it turns into a rule for how we speak about each other.

God had made Gideon understand that his courage and strength did not come from himself, and that his sword, in itself, was worth as little as a cake of barley bread. So, standing in front of Ephraim, he took care not to speak of himself. He gave his attention to what God had done through the hands of his brothers... He took the lowest place. He recognised the zeal for God that they had shown, after all, to their credit. So the humility of this servant of God removes a great difficulty. Let us act in the same way, and when we speak of our brothers, let us count up not their failures but what God has worked in them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What Was Left Unfinished

The soft answer worked — their anger cooled. But writers observe that calming a quarrel is not the same as curing it. Ephraim brought the same complaint against Jephthah, who led Israel later.

Gideon's humility had calmed him the first time. But nothing had reached his conscience, and he had never judged himself. So he brought the same accusations against Jephthah. A fault in our Christian life left unjudged will show up again sooner or later in similar circumstances.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Gleaning. Gideon calls Ephraim's leftovers better than his own full harvest. A fleeing army loses more men than a fighting one, so the compliment was also true.

- Jealousy. Ephraim's anger came from losing first place. Quarrels among God's people start when a man thinks of his own importance instead of God.

- Self-hiding. Gideon answers with no defence at all. You cannot pick a fight with someone already in the dust.

- Speech. The cure he models is practical: when you talk about others, count what God has done in them, not what they failed at.

- Unfinished. The anger cooled, but the pride was never judged. Ephraim made the same complaint again to Jephthah later on.

Judges 8:3 · Darby

Into your hands hath God delivered the princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb; and what was I able to do in comparison with you? Then their spirit was appeased toward him, when he said that word.

Gideon has just crushed Midian with three hundred men. Now the men of Ephraim confront him in anger, because he did not call them to the fight. His reply in this verse hands them the credit for capturing Oreb and Zeeb — and the quarrel dies on the spot.

An answer that was true, not flattery

Ephraim complained only after the danger had passed. Gideon's reply met them kindly, and it was also true to the facts of how a battle ends:

Many who had no heart for the work when everything looked dark are quick to complain about the conquerors… It is wonderful to find someone who knows how to handle irritated tempers, even in people who have done little to secure the victory. These men of Ephraim no doubt helped, and Gideon only said what was quite true. Everyone knows, I suppose, that an army loses far more men when the battle turns and it flees than while the fighting rages. Few fall during the struggle; many are cut down once it becomes a rout. So we can see how Gideon's mild answer might be strictly true. But we do well to weigh how lowly it was. The man who bore the brunt and faced all the danger was willing to take the least place and give the highest place to others, now that God had worked for His people. Sadly, it is as sweet as it is rare.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ephraim's real share in the work

Oreb and Zeeb were two Midianite leaders. Ephraim caught and killed them at the Jordan crossings, and their names carry a picture:

It is neither wise nor right to belittle the work of Ephraim. Oreb and Zeeb — "Raven" and "Wolf" — the princes of Midian had fallen at their hands at the fords of the Jordan. These names suggest the destructive character of that world whose "prince" spares nobody.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Gideon chose not to say

He had a strong case in reserve and left it unused:

They did not stop to consider that it was God who ordered the assault on Midian. They likely did not know that God had cut the army down to 300 instead of enlarging it by adding Ephraim. Gideon could have pointed these things out to them. Instead he took the wiser way: a soft answer that turned away their anger.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the anger collapsed

What beat Midian's army also beats a rival's envy:

Here, Christian reader, is the true way to overcome jealous and envious fellow believers. The barley loaf and the empty jar can defeat jealous Ephraimites as well as hostile Midianites. A self-hiding spirit is the great secret of victory over envy and jealousy, in all their ugly forms. It is hard, if not impossible, to quarrel with a man who is down in the dust, in true self-humbling.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Power and grace travel together

The man God had just used most is the man who speaks most gently:

Where the power of God is most at work, there is always the deepest grace, and the awareness that all that we are, we are by the grace of God… Gideon values others above himself. Nothing hinders blessing, personal or shared, like a feeling of being superior to others… Gideon puts himself and his three hundred in the shade, and brings the victory of the men of Ephraim into the light… It is a blessing when we can sink ourselves, so that others may come to the front. If anyone quarrels with us, let us seek grace to go down, take the lowest place, and give them credit.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same complaint, a different answer

Ephraim later brought the same complaint to Jephthah. The outcome shows what Gideon's answer spared Israel:

In Gideon's case a soft answer turned away wrath. Jephthah went straight on the defense. He told Ephraim, in effect, that he had expected them to rescue Israel from the Ammonites. When they failed to do this, he risked his own life and attacked the Ammonites, and God gave them into his hands. So Jephthah made it clear to them that they were in the wrong. But people rarely take it well when someone proves them wrong, and here it led straight into conflict.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how far this is a rule for every dispute. One writer sets a limit to it: "Some cases we must meet and deal with in grace. In other cases we must contend earnestly for the faith" (The Bible Treasury).

Summary

- Down — Gideon goes low first. No one can pick a quarrel with a man already in the dust.

- Credit — He hands Ephraim their true share. God gave them Oreb and Zeeb — "Raven" and "Wolf" — at the Jordan.

- Withheld — He also held back his winning argument: God Himself had cut the army to three hundred.

- Cooled — Anger dies and the camp holds together. Jephthah met the same complaint, proved his point, and got a war.

- Source — Where God's power works most, grace runs deepest. Nothing blocks blessing like feeling above others.

Judges 8:4 · Darby

And Gideon came to the Jordan, [and] passed over, he and the three hundred men that were with him, faint, yet pursuing.

Midian's camp broke and fled in the night, and the survivors are running east. The verse asks what every tired believer asks: what do you do when your strength is gone but the work is not finished?

Faint, Yet Pursuing

Writers dwell on what these three words refuse to say:

What three little words could be more blessedly descriptive of the Christian than these? Not "faint and sitting down," not "faint and giving up," but "faint, yet pursuing." We have to do with Him who "gives power to the faint" (Isaiah 40:29). "To him who has no might he increases strength." Here is a good use to make of our faintness and weariness: we draw on the full supply of grace and strength in Christ. Scripture says, "Be strong in the Lord and in the strength of His might." But to whom? To the one who has no strength in himself, who would give up his course if strength were not supplied to him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Weakness as the Engine

One writer goes further. He reads the faintness not as something Gideon beat, but as the thing that drove him:

Gideon cannot linger. He presses forward to make the victory complete. He crosses the Jordan and follows the fleeing army, "faint yet pursuing." What is the link between those two words? We might almost read it as "pursuing them because faint." It is still "out of weakness made strong." The man's own faintness and helplessness are what lead him to press on, for it is God who is working in him. He is like one of the old warriors in David's day whose hand stuck to the sword. Gideon has lost sight of everything but God, and he will never rest until he has overthrown the whole power of the enemy.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Daily Cost of Service

The exhaustion at the Jordan is not a one-off. It is the normal state of those who serve — the body wears down while the aim stays fixed:

Gideon and his companions met a second difficulty, far harder than the first. They were "faint yet pursuing." Outwardly they were perishing day by day, which is what believers face as they bear their testimony. At the same time they pressed forward to reach the goal, whatever it cost (2 Corinthians 4:16; Philippians 3:12).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Weakness Is No Excuse

One battle won does not end the war. The same writer presses the point:

One victory won, and the conflict starts again. Do we find ourselves fainting in spirit? Still let us go on, for our God gives strength to the weak. It is painful, no doubt, to feel our own weakness day after day. We want the battle to be over. But let us remember that now is our time of war. What we need is to live day by day on God. He is faithful, and He will supply strength for the occasion and the need. Weakness should be no hindrance to going forward — "faint, yet pursuing." If felt weakness were a reason for standing still, who was weaker than Gideon?

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Bright Lesson and a Searching Question

The same verse that praises the 300 also examines the reader. One writer points to the apostle Paul as the man who kept this up, and notes how little others thought of Gideon's persistence:

Here we have another lesson, bright as to the conquerors, but a painful one as to others. The Christian has a divine spring of power against weariness. But are we always "pursuing" like this? Paul was. "This one thing I do." How little others valued it in Gideon! He asked for refreshment for the 300 men, but he meets with taunts and abuse.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Victory Is the Lord's

Gideon's pursuit is swift and thorough, yet the honour is not his. One account traces his course and then places the credit where it belongs:

He is cautious, almost timid, until God gives him three signs to confirm his faith. But once he is sure that God is with them, he does not hesitate. He is swift, strong and thorough in action. He scatters the huge armies of Midian, follows them to the Jordan "faint yet pursuing," and captures and kills their rulers. His army had shrunk from 32,000 men to 300… But the victory itself is of course no special credit to Gideon: it is the Lord's doing and marvellous in our eyes.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Faint — The verse never says Gideon stopped being tired. It says he never sat down. Not "faint and giving up," but "faint, yet pursuing."

- Supplied — Emptiness qualifies you; it does not disqualify you. God "gives power to the faint," and He gives strength to the one who has none of his own.

- Pursuing — The weakness itself drives the chase: "pursuing them because faint." Out of weakness made strong, because God is working in the man.

- Complete — He crosses the Jordan rather than stopping at the victory already won. Faith that has lost sight of all but God will not rest until it has broken the enemy's whole power.

- His — The body wears down, the runner reaches the goal at any cost, and the win belongs to the Lord, not to Gideon.

Judges 8:5 · Darby

And he said to the men of Succoth, Give, I pray you, loaves of bread to the people that follow me, for they are faint; and I am pursuing after Zebah and Zalmunna, kings of Midian.

Gideon has crossed the Jordan with three hundred exhausted men. He is still chasing the two Midianite kings, and he stops at an Israelite town to ask for bread. The answer he gets turns a small request into a test of loyalty.

Asking His Own People for Bread

The men Gideon asks are his own people. He is fighting their war.

Gideon and his 300 men pursued Zebah and Zalmunna, the kings of Midian. They grew weary after a long day's fighting. Crossing the Jordan, they came to Succoth, a city of Israel, and there asked for bread for the army (v. 5). They had every right to it, for they were fighting Israel's battles. But the leaders of the city refused proudly. In effect they said that if Gideon had already defeated Zebah and Zalmunna, he might have reason to expect food from Succoth (v. 6).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Names That Their Conduct Denied

Succoth and Peniel both have meaningful names. One writer sets those names against the answer the two towns gave. (Peniel is another spelling of Penuel.)

What a contradiction to their names. Midian, you remember, is the world and its power, and Succoth means "tents"; it is a pilgrim word. Men who lived in tents should have been completely willing to help overthrow the power of the world. And Peniel means "the face of God." Men who look on the face of God should have been ready to give all the help they could to capture the kings of Midian, Zebah and Zalmunna. How their conduct gives the lie to their names.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Faint — And Still Going

Gideon explains his request by saying his men are worn out. Some translations read "faint, yet pursuing" in verse 4 where the ESV has "exhausted yet pursuing." One writer sees the weakness itself as the reason the pursuit continues.

What is the connection between those two words? I think we might almost read it, "pursuing them because faint." It is still "out of weakness made strong." It is the very faintness and helplessness of the man that leads him to press on, for it is God who is working in him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same words are read as a description of ordinary Christian life — not a temporary low patch, but the normal shape of the journey.

What three little words could be more descriptive of the Christian than these — not "faint, and sitting down," not "faint, and giving up," but "faint, yet pursuing." We deal with Him who "gives power to the faint" (Isaiah 40:29). "To him who has no might He increases strength." Our faintness and weariness have a blessed use: they draw on the full supply of grace and strength in Christ.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

No Supplies From the Other Side

One writer reads Succoth's refusal as a picture of the world itself.

This history teaches us next that the world is neither able nor willing to refresh the man of faith. The world never gives. It may concede something to us if we concede something to it, but it never gives. What it asks from us is usually the sacrifice of faithfulness.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer hears unbelief in that refusal: it wants proof before it will commit.

To them it seemed a foolish thing to be fighting with three hundred men against such enemies. So we seem to be very fools when we speak of certain glory. We must make up our minds to this. "You say you are kings and priests to God, that you are to have glory," is the taunt of unbelief, "but you cannot show us anything for it. When we see you in the glory, we will believe."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Holding Back Is Taking Sides

The refusal came from inside Israel. One writer treats holding back the bread as a choice of sides.

Ephraim had gone out to fight the enemy. But the men of Succoth held back, and they were in fact on the side of Midian. No one can be neutral at a time when the lines between Christ and the world are drawn. No one can be neutral without being on the side of the enemy. "Whoever is not with me is against me," says the Lord. So these men were as much the enemies of God as Midian was. They were more so, because they claimed to be God's people.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Two Kinds of Opposition, Two Responses

In the same chapter Gideon meets a complaint from Ephraim and a refusal from Succoth. He answers the two in opposite ways.

The men of Ephraim scold him for not calling them to the battle. With them he takes the lower place, the place of grace. That is the true, wise and godly position to hold toward those who want to stand out... But toward the men of Succoth and Penuel, who refused to supply bread to the "faint yet pursuing," he acts very differently. They must receive no quarter. Their conduct in refusing food to the 300, while they were fighting the enemy, was against the cause of God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Faint. Gideon asks for bread because his men are spent. He admits the weakness rather than hiding it.

- Pursuing. The faintness does not stop the chase; strength comes from God who gives power to those who have none.

- Refused. Succoth is an Israelite town whose name means tents. It denies food to the men fighting its battles.

- Exposed. Holding back at such a moment is not neutrality; it places a professed people of God on the enemy's side.

- Answered. Gideon meets Ephraim's complaint with grace and Succoth's betrayal with judgment. The response fits the fault.

Judges 8:6 · Darby

And the chief men of Succoth said, Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna already in thy hand, that we should give bread to thine army?

Gideon crosses the Jordan with three hundred exhausted men. He is still chasing the Midianite kings, and he asks a town of his own countrymen for bread. The leaders of Succoth sneer at him instead. Why would God's own people mock a man fighting their battle?

The Request and the Refusal

Gideon was asking his own nation for food while he fought for their freedom.

Gideon and his 300 men came to Succoth, a city of Israel, and asked for bread for the army (v. 5). They had every right to it, for they were fighting Israel's battles. But the leaders of the city refused with scorn. They said, in effect, that if the men had already defeated Zebah and Zalmunna they might have reason to expect food from Succoth (v. 6).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Keeping a Foot in the Enemy's Camp

To refuse bread was to pick a side, and Succoth did not pick Gideon's.

So here, among the people of God, was a whole city that carried the name of Israel and yet refused all shared responsibility with those who were bearing witness for the LORD. They said, "Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna already in your hand, that we should give bread to your army?" They had confidence in the enemy, and they would not compromise themselves by taking Israel's side. Many today carry the name of Christ and still want the friendship and the backing of the world. Afraid of compromising themselves, they make common cause with our enemies. They make the road harder for believers and keep them from being overcomers.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Commentators read the scene from two angles. Some take Succoth as a picture of the world, which "is neither able nor willing to supply refreshment to the man of faith" (J. N. Darby). Others stress that these men were Israelites, which makes the guilt worse.

No one can be neutral at a time when the lines between Christ and the world are drawn. To be neutral is to be on the side of the enemy. "Whoever is not with me is against me," says the Lord. So these men were as much God's enemies as Midian was — even more so, because they claimed to be the people of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Names That Told the Truth They Denied

The two towns Gideon approached carried meanings that made their answers absurd.

They were Israelites, and they were to share in the victory. What a shameful answer the men of Succoth and Penuel give, and what a contradiction to their names! Midian stands for the world and its power. Succoth means "tents", a pilgrim word, and men who lived in tents should be completely willing to help overthrow the power of the world. And Penuel means "the face of God." Men who look on the face of God should be ready to give all the help they can to capture the kings of Midian, Zebah and Zalmunna.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Demand for Proof

Succoth demanded visible results before it would lift a finger. Unbelief still talks that way.

To the leaders of Succoth and Penuel it seemed foolish to fight such enemies with three hundred men. So we look like fools too when we speak of a glory that is certain. We must make up our minds to this. The world has no resources to give us for the conflict we are in. "You say you are kings and priests to God, and that you are to have glory," is the taunt of unbelief, "but you cannot show us anything for it. When we see you in the glory, we will believe."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Supply From God, Not From Succoth

Gideon's men were "faint, yet pursuing" (v. 4; ESV: "exhausted yet pursuing"), and they kept going without the bread.

What three little words could describe the Christian better than these? Not "faint and sitting down," not "faint and giving up," but "faint, yet pursuing." We have to do with Him who "gives power to the faint" (Isaiah 40:29). "To him who has no might he increases strength." This is a blessed use to make of our faintness and weariness: it draws on the full supply of grace and strength in Christ.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Grace for Ephraim, Judgment for Succoth

Gideon had just answered the complaining men of Ephraim gently. Succoth gets the opposite.

With the men of Ephraim, who scold him for not calling them to the battle, he takes the lower place — the place of grace. That is the true, wise and godly position to take towards people who want to be noticed. But he acts very differently towards the men of Succoth and Penuel, who refused bread to the "faint yet pursuing". They get no mercy. Refusing food to the 300 while they fought the enemy set them against the cause of God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Even so, the reckoning waited. Gideon did not turn aside to settle the score: "Zebah and Zalmunna must not be allowed to escape; the judgment of the rebellious cities will be executed later" (H. L. Rossier).

Summary

- Faint — Gideon's men were exhausted, and their own people owed them bread.

- Refused — Succoth would not back a man who had not yet won. They trusted the enemy, not God.

- Exposed — one town was named "tents", the other "the face of God". Both denied their names. Staying neutral that day meant siding with Midian.

- Supplied — the three hundred went on anyway. God gives power to the faint, and the world's bread was never their real supply.

- Answered — Gideon met Ephraim's complaint with grace and Succoth's contempt with judgment. He finished the battle first.

Judges 8:7 · Darby

And Gideon said, Therefore when Jehovah delivers Zebah and Zalmunna into my hand, I will thresh your flesh with thorns of the wilderness and with briars.

Gideon and his three hundred men are worn out, still chasing two Midianite kings across the Jordan. They ask the Israelite town of Succoth for bread, Succoth sneers, and this verse is Gideon's reply.

Why Succoth Refused

The refusal was not about short supplies. Succoth was backing the winner it expected — an attitude still common wherever people hedge their bets:

They had confidence in the enemy, and would not compromise themselves by taking part with Israel. Many today bear the name of Christ and yet seek the friendship and alliance of the world. For fear of compromising themselves, they make common cause with our enemies. They make the way harder for believers and keep them from being overcomers.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same taunt meets anyone who stakes everything on a glory no one can see yet:

To them it seemed a foolish thing to be fighting with three hundred men against such enemies. So we seem to be very fools when we speak of certain glory. We must make up our minds to this. The world has no resources to give us for the conflict we are in. Unbelief taunts us: "You say you are kings and priests to God, and that you are to have glory. But you cannot show us anything for it. When we see you in the glory, we will believe."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Offence of Neutrality

Gideon had just answered the complaining men of Ephraim with grace. Succoth gets no such treatment.

With the men of Ephraim, who scold him for not calling them to the battle, he takes the lower place — that of grace… But he acts very differently towards the men of Succoth and Penuel. They refused to supply bread to men who were exhausted but still chasing the enemy, and they are to get no mercy. Their conduct in refusing food to the three hundred, while they fought the enemy, was against the cause of God and took the part of traitors to His name and glory.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Succoth thought it was standing aside. It was not.

No one can be neutral at a time when the lines between Christ and the world are drawn. No one can be neutral without being on the side of the enemy. "Whoever is not with me is against me," says the Lord. So these men were really as much the enemies of God as Midian; more so, because they were the professed people of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why Thorns

Gideon reaches for no sword. He picks the scrub of the desert, and that choice carries its own message.

He takes the briars of the wilderness to teach the men of Succoth. The briars and thorns speak of the curse that man's sin brought on this world.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Gideon's promise is to teach them. Thorns become the lesson for people who refuse an easier one.

How many of God's people get lashed by the briars and thorns of this life because they are neutral in the question between Christ and the world… You will be taught by thorns, if you will not be taught by the word of God… What a bitter way to learn — by sad experience and estrangement from God, instead of beating out the wheat and being made fit as the Lord's instrument.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Judgment Promised, Then Postponed

Notice the order in the verse: first the Lord gives the kings into Gideon's hand, then Gideon comes back. He will not let the insult pull him off the chase.

The man of God kept on his way; the shameful conduct of Penuel no more stops him than that of Succoth. Everything in its own time for God's witness. Satan seeks to bring in confusion about this, so as to make obstacles for us. Zebah and Zalmunna must not escape. The judgment of the rebellious cities comes later.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Question of Severity

The punishment sounds harsh. One writer ties it to Israel's particular calling, and to the difference between God's dealings then and now:

He asked for refreshment for the three hundred, but he meets with taunts and abuse. Gideon remembers this to their cost at a later hour, for it was heartless. Once the victory was secured, answering the outrage against the Lord's people in carrying out His work has its serious place. Israel was called to be the stage where God displayed His earthly righteousness. That is the true explanation of these things, which sometimes puzzle the Christian mind when it has not learned the difference between the dispensations.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. Succoth withheld bread from men fighting its own battles. It still had confidence in the enemy and would not risk taking sides.

- Neutral. There is no third side between Christ and the world. Commentators read Succoth as being on Midian's side, and worse for carrying God's name.

- Patience. Gideon does not turn aside to settle the score. He takes the kings first, and the cities wait their turn.

- Thorns. His tool is the curse the ground bears because of sin. Refuse to learn from God's word, and the briars will teach you instead.

- Taught. The verse's own word is teach. What unbelief mocks as foolish now, it will believe when it sees the glory.

Judges 8:8 · Darby

And he went up thence to Penuel, and spoke to them in like manner. And the men of Penuel answered him as the men of Succoth had answered.

Gideon is chasing the two Midianite kings with three hundred exhausted men, and the town of Succoth has just refused them bread. Penuel, an Israelite town, gives the same answer — so why do God's own people treat God's deliverer worse than the enemy does?

Two Israelite Towns, One Refusal

Succoth and Penuel belonged to Israel, not to Midian.

Succoth rejected them, refusing even to give them bread. So here, among the people of God, was a whole city. It bore the name of Israel, yet it had disowned all shared responsibility with those who were bearing testimony for the Lord. They said, "Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand, that we should give bread to your army?" They had confidence in the enemy. They would not compromise themselves by taking sides with Israel.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Penuel repeats the insult, and Gideon answers with a threat aimed at their tower.

Another city in Israel, Penuel, when asked for food, spoke to Gideon in the same insulting way. How sad it is when God's people not only give no support to those fighting God's battles, but insult them instead! In Penuel's case, Gideon tells them that when he came back he would tear down their tower. The tower was there to watch for enemy attacks, but Penuel had no interest in opposing the enemy. So what use was their tower?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Names They Contradicted

The two place names carry meanings that their behaviour flatly denies.

Weak in body, he asks the men of Succoth and of Penuel for food. They were Israelites, and they were going to share in the victory. But oh, the shame of their answer! What a contradiction to their names. Midian, you remember, is the world and its power, and Succoth means "tents"; it is a pilgrim word. Surely men who lived in tents ought to have been perfectly willing to help overthrow the power of the world. And Penuel means "the face of God." Men who look on the face of God would surely be ready to help capture Midian's kings, Zebah and Zalmunna. How their conduct gives the lie to their names.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Sitting Out Is Taking a Side

Gideon had just answered the complaining men of Ephraim gently. Succoth and Penuel get no such words.

They mock Gideon, and so you find he had no gentle words for them, as he had for the men of Ephraim. It is a very different thing. Ephraim had taken the field against the enemy. But the men of Succoth were holding back, and were really on Midian's side. No one can be neutral at a time when the lines between Christ and the world are drawn. No one can be neutral without being on the enemy's side. "Whoever is not with me is against me," says the Lord. So these men were really as much God's enemies as Midian — more so, because they were His professed people.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Taunt Faith Should Expect

Behind the refusal lies a calculation: three hundred faint men could not beat the kings of Midian. The world still does that sum on believers.

Gideon was going forward in the confidence of victory, though he knew he was faint. These princes of Succoth and men of Penuel would not come to the help of the Lord against the mighty. To them it seemed foolish to fight such enemies with three hundred men. In the same way we seem complete fools when we speak of glory that is certain. We must make up our minds to this. The world has no resources to give us for the conflict we are in.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Settled Later, Not Forgotten

Gideon threatens Penuel but does not stop to carry it out. First the kings, then the reckoning.

Everything in its time for God's witness. Satan seeks to bring in confusion about this, to create obstacles for us. Zebah and Zalmunna must not escape. Judgment on the rebellious cities comes later.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same delay works on a larger scale. God keeps account of scorn aimed at His servants.

By and by the tables will be turned. The taunts and reproaches of the world will bring judgment down on their own heads. We are told of one special thing the Lord is coming to judge: "all the harsh things that ungodly sinners have spoken against him" (Jude 15). There is no present ridicule of His saints that will not be counted as against Himself in that day.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Name. Penuel means "the face of God" — and the men who bore that name refused bread to the man fighting God's battle. A name contradicted by conduct is the whole tragedy of this verse.

- Neutral. They thought they were staying out of it. When the lines are drawn, no one is neutral; holding back put them on Midian's side.

- Nerve. Their scorn was really a bet on the enemy's odds — three hundred faint men could not win. The world offers no resources for this conflict, so expect the taunt.

- Nothing gained. Their watchtower guarded a city with no interest in the enemy; a defence kept for self alone is useless.

- Not forgotten. Gideon presses on and settles the account afterwards. Delayed judgment is not cancelled judgment — and scorn poured on God's servants lands at last on His own account.

Judges 8:9 · Darby

And he spoke also to the men of Penuel, saying, When I come again in peace, I will break down this tower.

Gideon crosses the Jordan with three hundred exhausted men, still chasing the two Midianite kings. He asks two Israelite towns for bread; both refuse, Penuel insults him as Succoth did, and Gideon leaves it with a promise about the day of his return.

A tower with nothing to guard

Gideon aims his threat at Penuel's tower. One writer points out the irony: a watchtower held by people with no interest in the fight.

Another city in Israel, Penuel, when asked for food, spoke in the same insulting way to Gideon. How sad it is when God's people give no support to those fighting God's battles, and insult them instead! Gideon tells Penuel that when he returns he will tear down their tower. The tower was there to watch for enemy attacks, but Penuel had no interest in opposing the enemy. Then of what use was their tower?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Bearing the name, backing the enemy

Commentators read the refusal from two angles. Succoth refused first, and Penuel answered the same way. One writer sees a whole city inside Israel that had cut itself out of the nation's cause.

So right among the people of God stood a whole city that carried the name of Israel. It had thrown off any shared responsibility with those who stood as witnesses for Jehovah. They said, "Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna already in your hand, that we should give bread to your army?" They trusted the enemy, and would not risk themselves by siding with Israel. Many today carry the name of Christ and still want the world's friendship and alliance. Afraid of putting themselves at risk, they take the side of our enemies. They make the road harder for believers and hold them back from being overcomers.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The taunt of unbelief

The second angle hears unbelief in their answer. They mocked a man who claimed a victory he could not yet show.

Gideon went forward sure of victory, though he knew he was faint, and these leaders of Succoth and the men of Penuel would not come to help Jehovah against the mighty. To them it looked foolish to fight such enemies with three hundred men. In the same way we look like complete fools when we speak of a glory we are certain of. We must make up our minds to this. The world has no resources to offer us for the conflict we are in. "You say you are kings and priests to God, and that you are to have glory," is the taunt of unbelief, "but you cannot show us anything for it. When we see you in the glory, we will believe."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The insult does not stop the pursuit

Gideon says his piece and keeps walking. The kings come first, and the threat waits for its own hour.

The man of God kept on his way. Penuel's shameful conduct stopped him no more than Succoth's had. Everything in its own time for God's witness. Satan tries to confuse us here, so that he can put obstacles in our way. Zebah and Zalmunna must not escape; the rebel cities will come under judgment later.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the reckoning was right

Gideon's later punishment of these towns troubles many readers. One writer explains it as the answer to an outrage done to God's people while they were doing God's work.

He asked for food for the three hundred, but he met taunts and abuse, and Gideon remembered it at their cost in a later hour; for it was heartless. Once the victory was won, the wrong done to Jehovah's people while they were carrying out His work had to be put right, and that has its solemn place. Israel was called to be the stage where God displayed His righteousness on earth. That is the true explanation of these things, which sometimes trouble Christians who have not learned how God's ways differ from one age to another.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A returning day that turns the tables

Gideon's "when I come again" has a longer echo. God does not forget the mockery aimed at His servants, and a day of accounting is coming.

We must keep going, feeling our weakness and sure of victory. In time the tables will be turned. The taunts and insults of the world will bring judgment down on their own heads. One special thing the Lord is coming to judge, we are told, is "all the harsh things that ungodly sinners have spoken against Him." (Jude 15.) In that day He will count every present mockery of His saints as aimed at Himself.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. Penuel would not feed men fighting God's battle, and repeated Succoth's insult.

- Emptiness. Their tower watched for enemies they had no wish to fight. The defence they trusted was already useless.

- Motive. They trusted the enemy instead of risking themselves for Israel. Many still carry God's name while courting His opponents.

- Delay. Gideon did not argue or turn aside. The kings came first, and the rebel cities would face judgment later.

- Return. "When I come again in peace" is the hinge. God counts today's ridicule of His servants as spoken against Himself, and the tables will be turned.

Judges 8:10 · Darby

Now Zebah and Zalmunna were in Karkor, and their camp with them, about fifteen thousand [men], all that were left of the whole camp of the children of the east; for there had fallen a hundred and twenty thousand men that drew sword.

The chase pauses here for a count. Fifteen thousand fighting men are still camped at Karkor, and a hundred and twenty thousand have already fallen. So why does Gideon, with three hundred tired men, press on against an enemy that still outnumbers him fifty to one?

The Count

The numbers are not decoration. They show how little of Midian's army survived, and who brought it down.

Zebah and Zalmunna were in Karkor, with 15,000 men, for 120,000 of their army had been killed, an amazing decimation (v. 10). The 15,000 were clearly paralyzed with fear and unable to resist the assault of 300 men! They had traveled some miles and felt safe from any more fighting (v. 11). Then the attack came and routed them completely. Of course it was the Lord who gave the victory, and they took the two kings, Zebah and Zalmunna, captive (v. 12).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why did so many die? One writer explains where an army actually loses its men.

Everyone knows, I suppose, that an army suffers its main destruction when the battle turns, far more than while it rages. Few fall during the struggle itself. Many more are cut down once it has become a flight.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strength Out Of Weakness

Gideon reached this point faint, and still chasing. One commentator ties those two words together instead of setting them against each other.

What is the connection between those two words? We might almost read it as, "pursuing them because faint." It is still "out of weakness made strong." The very faintness and helplessness of the man is what makes him press on, for it is God who is working in him. Like one of the old warriors in David's day, whose hand stuck to the sword, Gideon has lost sight of all but God. He will never rest until he has overthrown the whole power of the enemy.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

First Things First

Not every obstacle came from Midian. Some of it came from Israel's own towns.

Succoth rejected them, refusing even to give them bread. Here, among the people of God, was a whole city bearing the name of Israel that had thrown off any shared responsibility with those who stood for the Lord. They had confidence in the enemy, and would not compromise themselves by taking part with Israel. Many today bear the name of Christ and yet want friendship and alliance with the world. For fear of compromising themselves, they make common cause with our enemies. They make the road harder for believers and keep them from being overcomers. Our hearts, like Gideon's, should be wholly in the conflict. The man of God kept on his way. The shameful conduct of Penuel stops him no more than that of Succoth did. Everything in its time for God's witness. Satan tries to confuse us about this, so as to put obstacles in our way. Zebah and Zalmunna must not escape; the rebellious cities face their judgment later.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What The Names Say

The place names in this stretch of the chapter carry meaning, though commentators admit the ground here is uncertain.

Much depends here upon the names, and the meaning of some of them is hard to determine. Karkor, from a root meaning "to dig," describes deep, soft, level ground — the usual rendering is "deep ground."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A Pattern For Later

The two kings are more than beaten soldiers. One writer reads their names and finds in them both the crime and the sentence.

Zebah, "sacrifice," points here not to the way of approach to God, but to the "slaughter" the world delights to inflict on the people of God, without mercy — as Zalmunna, "shade," or "refuge denied," suggests. So a like slaughter would come back on them, without mercy to shelter them: "For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy." This victory over Midian becomes the pattern for the final overthrow of Israel's enemies, both in the prayer of the suffering remnant (Ps. 83), and in what Isaiah predicted (Isa. 9:4).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Count — 120,000 had already fallen and 15,000 remained. An army loses most of its men in flight, not in the fight.

- Weakness — Gideon came to Karkor faint, and that is the point. He was "pursuing them because faint," because God was the one working in him.

- Reach — the 15,000 felt safe, far from any more fighting. Three hundred tired men routed them, because the Lord gave the victory.

- Order — Zebah and Zalmunna must not escape. The towns that refused bread get their answer afterwards. Finish the enemy first, settle accounts second.

- Result — the names spell it out: Zebah, "sacrifice"; Zalmunna, "refuge denied." Those who showed no mercy find none, and Midian's fall becomes the pattern for the last overthrow of God's enemies.

Judges 8:11 · Darby

And Gideon went up by the way of them that dwell in tents on the east of Nobah and Jogbehah, and smote the camp; for the camp was at its ease.

Gideon has already broken Midian's army, yet he is still marching — over the Jordan, past towns that refused his hungry men bread, to the last enemy camp at Karkor. Verse 11 finds his worn-out three hundred attacking that camp, and it raises a question: why does faith press on when strength is gone?

An army that thought it was safe

The army Gideon struck was all that was left of a much larger host.

Zebah and Zalmunna were in Karkor with 15,000 men, for 120,000 of their army had been killed, an amazing reduction. The 15,000 seemed almost paralyzed with fear. They could not resist an assault by 300 men! They had travelled some miles and felt safe from any more fighting. Then Gideon's men attacked and routed them completely. Of course it was the Lord who gave the victory.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The road by the tent-dwellers

Gideon comes by the tent dwellers' road, and the verse marks his route with place names. One writer weighs what each one means.

Much depends here upon the names, and the meaning of some of them is hard to determine… Karkor comes from a root meaning "to dig." It describes deep, soft, level ground — usually given as "deep ground." Jogbehah means "elevation," or "it is exalted." Nobah means "barking."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Pursuing because faint

Older translations describe Gideon on this march as "faint, yet pursuing." Ridout reads that exhaustion not as a limit on the pursuit but as the reason for it.

Gideon cannot linger. He presses forward to make the victory complete. He crosses the Jordan and follows the fleeing army, "faint yet pursuing." What is the connection between those two words? We might almost read it, "pursuing them because faint." It is still "made strong out of weakness." The man's own faintness and helplessness is what drives him on, for it is God who is working in him… Gideon has lost sight of everything but God. He will never rest until he has overthrown the whole power of the enemy.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Ridout also notes the help Gideon never got on that march:

But he goes on without their help, and God gives the whole host of Midian, and Zebah and Zalmunna also, the kings, into his hands.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One victory over, the next battle begins

One writer makes Gideon's weary march a picture of the Christian's daily life.

What three little words could describe the Christian better than these? Not "faint, and sitting down." Not "faint, and giving up." But "faint, yet pursuing." We have to do with Him who "gives power to the faint," and "to him who has no might He increases strength" (Isaiah 40:29)… It is a blessed use to make of our faintness and weariness — to draw on the full supply of grace and strength in Christ… One victory achieved, the conflict goes on afresh. We want to feel that the battle is over; but let us remember that now is our time of war… But weakness ought to be no hindrance to our going forward — "faint, yet pursuing." If felt weakness were a reason for standing still, who was ever as weak as Gideon?

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A pattern for the final victory

Ridout reads the names of the two Midianite kings, and then the whole campaign, as pointing forward.

Two kings, rather than one, would suggest the duplicity of the world, its variety, and the varied forms in which Satan presents himself. Zebah means "sacrifice." Here it suggests not the way of approach to God, but the slaughter the world delights to inflict on God's people, without mercy — as Zalmunna, "shade," or "refuge denied," also suggests. So the same slaughter would fall on them, with no mercy to shelter them: "For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy." This victory over Midian became the pattern for the final overthrow of Israel's enemies. It shapes the prayer of the suffering remnant (Psalm 83) and the fulfilment Isaiah predicted (Isaiah 9:4).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Faint — Gideon reaches this camp with nothing left in himself. The writers make his weakness the reason he keeps going: "pursuing them because faint," for God was working in him.

- Forward — one victory does not end the war. Weariness should send us to the full supply of grace and strength in Christ. It is no excuse for sitting down: "weakness ought to be no hindrance to our going forward."

- Alone — refused bread by his own people, he goes on without their help — and God hands him the whole host anyway.

- Secure — the enemy had put miles between itself and the battle and felt safe. That false sense of safety is where the blow lands. The Lord gave the victory, not the three hundred.

- Pattern — this defeat of Midian becomes Scripture's picture of the last overthrow of Israel's enemies. Psalm 83 prays for it; Isaiah 9:4 promises it.

Judges 8:12 · Darby

And Zebah and Zalmunna fled, and he pursued after them, and he took the two kings of Midian, Zebah and Zalmunna, and discomfited all the camp.

Gideon and his three hundred men catch up with the two Midianite kings, scatter the rest of their army, and take the kings alive. It ends a chase that began with a worn-out band crossing the Jordan. Why did the pursuit have to go this far? And who won it?

Pursuit That Does Not Stop Halfway

One writer asks why a worn-out man kept running. He quotes the older wording of verse 4, "faint yet pursuing," where the ESV reads "exhausted yet pursuing":

He crosses over the Jordan and follows after the fleeing army, "faint yet pursuing." What is the link between those two words? We might almost read it as "pursuing them because faint." It is still a case of being "made strong out of weakness." The man's very faintness and helplessness is what leads him to press on, for it is God who is working in him. Like one of the old heroes in David's day, whose hand stuck to the sword, Gideon has lost sight of everything but God. He will never rest until he has overthrown the whole power of the enemy.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An Army That Felt Safe

Another writer sets the numbers beside the mood in the enemy camp:

Zebah and Zalmunna were in Karkor with 15,000 men, for 120,000 of their army had already fallen — an amazing reduction (v. 10). Fear had clearly almost paralysed the 15,000. They could not resist the assault of 300 men! They had travelled some miles and felt safe from any more fighting (v. 11). Then Gideon attacked and routed them completely. Of course it was the Lord who gave the victory, and they took the two kings, Zebah and Zalmunna, captive (v. 12).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Kings, Not Just Princes

Earlier two Midianite princes had fallen. Here Gideon takes the kings, and one writer sees meaning in there being two of them:

To Gideon belongs the honour of destroying not just the princes, but the kings of Midian. Perhaps the fact that there were two suggests the double-dealing and variety in the world, and the many forms in which Satan presents himself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same writer reads their names as a record of what they did, and of what came back on them:

Zebah means "sacrifice." Here it does not point to the way of approach to God. It points to the "slaughter" that the world loves to inflict on the people of God, without mercy — as Zalmunna, "shade," or "refuge denied," shows. So the same slaughter would fall on them, with no mercy to shelter them: "For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy." This victory over Midian becomes the pattern for the final overthrow of Israel's enemies. You see it in the prayer of the suffering remnant (Psalm 83), and in the fulfilment Isaiah predicted (Isaiah 9:4).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Taunt of Unbelief

One writer connects the scorn Gideon met with the scorn believers meet now:

The princes of Succoth and the men of Penuel would not come to help the Lord against the mighty. To them it seemed foolish to fight with three hundred men against such enemies. We seem to be great fools too when we speak of certain glory. The world has no resources to give us for the conflict we are in. "You say you are kings and priests to God, that you are to have glory," is the taunt of unbelief, "but you cannot show us anything for it; when we see you in the glory, we will believe."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

First the Kings, Then the Cities

Gideon had promised to deal with Succoth and Penuel, but he did not turn aside to do it while the kings were still loose. One commentator draws a rule of priority out of that order:

Our hearts, like Gideon's, should be wholly in the conflict. The man of God kept on his way. The shameful conduct of Penuel no more stops him than that of Succoth. Everything in its time for God's witness. Satan seeks to bring in confusion about this, so as to make obstacles for us. Zebah and Zalmunna must not escape; the judgment of the rebellious cities comes later.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Faint — Weakness kept Gideon moving instead of stopping him. He pressed on because God was working in him.

- Pursuing — He would not settle for a partial win. He chased until the whole power of the enemy fell.

- Secure — The enemy felt safe, and that was the opening. Fifteen thousand men collapsed before three hundred, and the Lord gave the victory.

- Kings — Gideon takes the two heads, not just the princes. Their names picture the many forms the world and Satan take, and they spell out slaughter and refuge denied — now repaid without mercy.

- Order — The kings first, the rebellious cities afterwards. Everything in its time; confusion about the order is how the enemy makes obstacles.

Judges 8:13 · Darby

And Gideon the son of Joash returned from the battle, from the ascent of Heres.

Gideon has captured the two kings of Midian and now turns back from the chase. Waiting for him are two towns of his own people who refused his men bread — and the question of what a servant of God does once the fighting is over.

Victory First, Reckoning After

Gideon did not break off the chase to settle his grievance. He finished the work first.

He asked for food for the three hundred, but he met taunts and insults. Gideon remembered this, and it cost them later, for it was heartless. Once the victory was won, what was needed to answer the outrage done to Jehovah's people while they were doing His work has its solemn place. Israel was called to be the stage where God displayed His earthly righteousness. That is the true explanation of all these things, which sometimes puzzle Christians who have not been taught how God's ways differ from one age to another.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Refusal That Brought Him Back

Succoth was not a foreign city. It bore the name of Israel, and one writer sees the same spirit at work now.

So here, among the people of God, stood a whole city that bore the name of Israel. It had thrown off all shared responsibility with those who were testifying for Jehovah... Many today bear the name of Christ and yet want the world's friendship and alliance. Afraid of compromising themselves, they side with our enemies. They make the road harder for believers and keep them from overcoming... Everything has its time for God's witness. Satan tries to confuse us about this, so as to put obstacles in our way. Zebah and Zalmunna must not escape; the judgment of the rebellious cities would come later.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Two Kinds of Opposition

The men of Ephraim also complained, and Gideon answered them gently. Succoth and Penuel got something else.

The men of Ephraim scold him for not calling them to the battle, and with them he takes the lower place. That is the place of grace, and it is the true, wise and godly position to hold towards those who want to be seen... But he acts very differently towards the men of Succoth and Penuel, who refused bread to the men who were "exhausted yet pursuing." They must receive no mercy. They refused food to the 300 while those men were fighting the enemy. That was against the cause of God, and it took the side of traitors to His name and glory... The principle is the same in both ages. Some cases we must meet and deal with in grace; in others we must contend earnestly for the faith.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

No Neutral Ground

Their crime was not open hostility. It was sitting out the conflict — and that, one commentator argues, is a side.

Ephraim had gone out to fight the enemy, but the men of Succoth held back, and so they were on the side of Midian. No one can be neutral at a time when the line between Christ and the world is drawn. No one can be neutral without being on the side of the enemy. "Whoever is not with me is against me," says the Lord. So these men were as much the enemies of God as Midian — more so, because they claimed to be God's people.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Taunt Answered by the Outcome

Until the victory came, the scorn looked reasonable: three hundred exhausted men against a huge army. One writer applies that mockery to believers today.

Gideon went forward sure of victory, though he knew he was worn out. These princes of Succoth and the men of Penuel would not come to help Jehovah against the mighty. To them it looked foolish to fight three hundred men against such enemies. So we look like fools when we speak of a glory that is certain. We must make up our minds to this. The world has no resources to give us for the conflict we are in.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Danger on the Way Home

Gideon comes home a winner. One writer notes that his ruin began here, on the side he was not guarding.

He had energy, to gather and purify the people for battle and for the pursuit of the enemy. He had humility, which freed him from all self-confidence and led him to rely completely on Jehovah. And yet the enemy was about to set a trap for him on the side that seemed to need the least watching. In the end that trap brought about the moral ruin of this great leader in Israel.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Return. Gideon finished the chase first. He answered the insult only after he had won the victory.

- Refusal. Succoth and Penuel refused bread to men fighting God's battle. They bore the name of Israel but had dropped all shared responsibility with God's witnesses.

- Neutrality. Holding back is not safety. Men who claimed to belong to God stood with the enemy instead.

- Discernment. Gideon met Ephraim's complaint with grace and Succoth's betrayal with judgment. One servant, two responses, each fitted to the case.

- Risk. The road home proved more dangerous than the battlefield. The trap came where Gideon thought no watching was needed.

Judges 8:14 · Darby

And he caught a youth of the men of Succoth, and inquired of him; and he wrote down for him the chief men of Succoth, and the elders thereof, seventy-seven men.

Gideon has captured the two Midianite kings and is heading home. His road takes him back through Succoth. That Israelite town had mocked him and refused food to his exhausted men. There he catches one young man. That young man gives him the names of the seventy-seven men who spoke for the city.

The list of seventy-seven names

The names tell Gideon who to hold responsible, and he acts on them at once.

On the way back from the battle, as they came near Succoth, Gideon caught a young man who lived in that city. He wanted to learn from him who the leaders and elders of Succoth were. The young man gave him 77 names (v. 14). So Gideon confronted these leaders with the fact that he had now captured Zebah and Zalmunna. He reminded them of their insulting words (v. 15), and "taught" them with the thorns and briars of the wilderness, just as he had promised (v. 16).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A city inside Israel that had sided with the enemy

The seventy-seven were not foreigners. They led an Israelite city that had put its confidence in the enemy.

Succoth turned them away and refused even to give them bread. So here, among the people of God, was a whole city that carried the name of Israel, yet had thrown off all shared responsibility with those who stood as witnesses for the LORD… They put their confidence in the enemy, and would not risk their own position by siding with Israel. Many today carry the name of Christ, and yet look for the world's friendship and partnership. Afraid of compromising themselves, they side with our enemies. They make the road harder for believers, and they keep them from being overcomers.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Names that contradicted the men who bore them

The names of these two towns carried meaning. Both pointed the opposite way from what their men did.

Remember that Midian stands for the world and its power. Succoth means "tents." It is a pilgrim's word. Men who lived in tents should have been more than willing to help overthrow the power of the world. And Peniel means "the face of God." Men who are looking at the face of God should have been ready to give every help in capturing Zebah and Zalmunna, the kings of Midian. Their behaviour made a lie of their names.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why there was no middle ground

Gideon treats these seventy-seven far more harshly than he treated Ephraim. The difference is where each group stood.

Ephraim had gone out to fight the enemy. The men of Succoth held back, and so they were really on Midian's side. No one can be neutral at a time when the line between Christ and the world is clear. To be neutral is to be on the enemy's side. "Whoever is not with me is against me," says the Lord. So these men were as much the enemies of God as Midian was — and more so, because they claimed to be the people of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Grace in one case, firmness in the other

Gideon's two responses are not a contradiction. Each answers a different kind of opposition.

The men of Ephraim scold him for not calling them to the battle. With them he takes the lower place — the place of grace. That is the true, wise and godly way to treat people who want to be noticed… But he acts in a very different way towards the men of Succoth and Penuel. They refused bread to men who were "exhausted yet pursuing"… They held back food from the 300 while the 300 were fighting the enemy, and that set them against the cause of God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Taught by thorns

The thorns were a lesson, and not only for Succoth.

How many of God's people are whipped by the briars and thorns of this life, because they stay neutral in the question between Christ and the world. Are you standing in a neutral place between God and the world? You will get the thorns on your back. You will be taught by thorns, if you will not be taught by the word of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Named. One young man writes down seventy-seven names. The men who mocked Gideon are now known one by one.

- Neutral. Succoth held back from the battle, and holding back was itself taking the enemy's side.

- Name betrayed. A town called "tents" — a pilgrim word — lived as though it had settled down with the world it should have helped overthrow.

- Not one rule. Gideon met Ephraim's complaint with grace. He met Succoth's refusal with discipline. Different opposition needs different treatment.

- Nothing wasted. What God's people will not learn from His word, they end up learning from the thorns.

Judges 8:15 · Darby

And he came to the men of Succoth, and said, Behold Zebah and Zalmunna, with whom ye did upbraid me, saying, Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna already in thy hand, that we should give bread to thy men that are weary?

Gideon comes back from battle with the two Midianite kings and walks into the town that had jeered at him. Why does a refusal of bread matter so much, and why is Gideon, so gentle with complaining Ephraim, so hard on his own countrymen here?

The Taunt Returned

Gideon does not argue with Succoth. He produces the evidence they had demanded and quotes them to themselves.

Returning from the battle, as they neared Succoth, Gideon caught a young man who lived in that city. He wanted to learn from him who the leaders and elders of Succoth were. The young man gave him 77 names (v. 14). So he confronted these leaders: he had now captured Zebah and Zalmunna. He reminded them of their insulting words (v. 15).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Unbelief Was Really Saying

Their question was not a real question. They wanted proof of victory before they would give any help. Darby hears the same voice in the world's mockery of believers today.

Confident of victory, Gideon was going forward, though he knew he was worn out. Meanwhile these leaders of Succoth and the men of Penuel would not come to the help of the Lord against the mighty. To them it seemed a foolish thing to fight such enemies with only three hundred men. So we seem to be great fools when we speak of certain glory. We must make up our minds to this. The world has no resources to give us for the conflict we are in. The taunt of unbelief says, "You say you are kings and priests to God, and that you are to have glory. But you cannot show us anything for it. When we see you in the glory, we will believe."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Neutrality Was Not Neutral

Succoth had not joined Midian. It only refused to take sides while the battle was on. Ridout argues that this put the city on the enemy's side.

Ephraim had taken the field against the enemy, but the men of Succoth were holding back, and were really on the side of Midian. No one can be neutral in a time when the lines between Christ and the world are drawn. No one can be neutral without being on the side of the enemy. "Whoever is not with me is against me," says the Lord. So these men were really as much the enemies of God as Midian; more so, because they were the professed people of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The refusal is also read as a wish to stay safely on good terms with the winning side:

They had confidence in the enemy, and would not compromise themselves by taking part with Israel. Many today bear the name of Christ and still want the friendship and alliance of the world. For fear of compromising themselves, they make common cause with our enemies. This makes the way harder for believers, and keeps them from being overcomers.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Two Kinds of Opposition, Two Responses

Ephraim quarrelled with Gideon and got a soft answer; Succoth met a hard one. The difference is not temper but the nature of the offence.

But toward the men of Succoth and Penuel, who refused to supply bread to the "exhausted yet pursuing," he acts very differently. They must receive no mercy. They refused food to the 300 while the 300 were fighting the enemy. That was against the cause of God, and it took the part of traitors to His name and glory. The principle is the same in both ages. Some cases we must meet and deal with in grace. In others we must contend earnestly for the faith.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Everything in Its Time

Gideon did not turn aside to settle the score when the insult was fresh. The kings were caught first; Succoth was dealt with afterwards, exactly as he had said.

The man of God kept on his way; the shameful conduct of Penuel no more stopped him than that of Succoth. Everything in its time for God's witness. Satan seeks to bring in confusion about this, so as to make obstacles for us. Zebah and Zalmunna must not be allowed to escape; the judgment of the rebellious cities will be carried out later.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Mockery Is Never Forgotten

Darby applies Succoth's mockery to every believer who is laughed at today.

We have not one thing to show, nothing the natural man can take notice of. Our wisdom is foolishness. We must go on feeling our weakness, confident of victory. By and by the tables will be turned. The taunts and reproaches of the world will bring down judgment on their own heads. One special thing the Lord is coming to judge is "all the harsh things that ungodly sinners have spoken against Him" (Jude 15). There is no present ridicule of His saints that will not be counted as against Himself in that day.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Taunt. Succoth demanded proof before it would help. Gideon brought the proof and gave them their own words back.

- Unbelief. The same voice still says it will believe when it sees the glory, and gives the believer nothing until then.

- Neutrality. Refusing to take sides puts a person on the enemy's side — and worse, when that person carries God's name.

- Answer. Ephraim's complaint met grace; Succoth's betrayal met judgment. The answer fits the offence.

- Reckoning. God counts every taunt against His people as a taunt against Himself, and He will answer it in His day.

Judges 8:16 · Darby

And he took the elders of the city, and thorns of the wilderness and briars, and with them he taught the men of Succoth.

Gideon has captured the two Midianite kings and comes back to the town that had mocked him and refused his exhausted men a meal. The verse calls what he does to its leaders "teaching" — so why treat fellow Israelites so harshly, and what were thorns meant to teach?

A town of Israel that would not take sides

Succoth was not enemy territory. The refusal came from inside God's own people.

Succoth rejected them, refusing even to give them bread. So here, in the middle of the people of God, was a whole city bearing the name of Israel. It had dropped all shared responsibility with those who were bearing testimony for the Lord. They said, "Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand, that we should give bread to your army?" They trusted the enemy. They would not compromise themselves by taking Israel's side.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why they held back

Their sneer was about evidence. Gideon had three hundred worn-out men and no captured kings to show, so backing him looked like a bad bet.

Gideon was going forward in the confidence of victory, though he knew he was faint. But these leaders of Succoth and the men of Penuel would not come to the help of the Lord against the mighty. To them it seemed a foolish thing to fight such enemies with three hundred men. So we seem to be great fools when we speak of certain glory. We must make up our minds to this. The world has no resources to help us on in the conflict we are engaged in. Unbelief taunts us: "You say you are kings and priests to God, that you are to have glory. But you cannot show us anything for it. When we see you in the glory, we will believe."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The threat kept, but not first

Gideon announced the punishment on his way out and carried it out only on his way back. The order matters: he crushed the enemy first, then dealt with the traitors at home.

He does not stop for the punishment he threatens them with: "faint yet pursuing," they press on.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Thorns as the teacher

Gideon first had to find out who the town's leaders were. The verse says he "taught" them, and the lesson landed on their bodies.

As they neared Succoth on the way back from the battle, Gideon caught a young man who lived in that city, to learn from him who the leaders and elders of Succoth were. The young man gave him 77 names (v. 14). So he faced these leaders with the news that he had now captured Zebah and Zalmunna. He reminded them of their insulting words (v. 15), and "taught" them with thorns and briars of the wilderness, as he had promised (v. 16). This meant the thorns and briars tore their bodies (v. 7) — certainly a painful punishment, to say the least! Then he tore down the tower of Penuel and killed the men of the city (v. 17), likely meaning the leaders among them. We are not told why the punishment of the men of Succoth differed from that of Penuel, but no doubt Gideon had a reason for this.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ridout turns the scene on the reader who wants to stay uncommitted:

How many of God's people get whipped with the briars and thorns of this life, because they are neutral in the question between Christ and the world. Do you take a neutral place between God and the world? You will get the thorns on your back. You will be taught by thorns, if you will not be taught by the word of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why Ephraim got grace and Succoth did not

Earlier in the same chapter, the men of Ephraim complained to Gideon, and he gave way to them. Why did Succoth get thorns instead?

The men of Ephraim complain that he did not call them to the battle, and with them he takes the lower place. That is grace — the true, wise and godly position to hold toward those who want to be noticed... But toward the men of Succoth and Penuel, who refused to supply bread to the "faint yet pursuing," he acts very differently. They must receive no mercy. They refused food to the three hundred while those men were fighting the enemy. That was against the cause of God, and took the part of traitors to His name and glory. The same principle holds in both Old and New Testament times. There are cases we must meet and handle in grace; but we are, on the other hand, to contend earnestly for the faith.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Neutral — Succoth was Israelite soil, yet it cut itself off from those bearing testimony for God. It trusted the enemy instead.

- Unbelief — its taunt demanded proof of victory before it would risk anything. Faith has nothing to show until the glory comes.

- Timing — Gideon finished the war first and settled with the traitors afterward. Faint yet pursuing, he would not stop for revenge.

- Taught — the "teaching" was real thorns on real backs. Refuse to learn from the word of God, and thorns become the teacher.

- Two answers — grace answered complaining Ephraim; firmness answered treacherous Succoth. The same chapter holds both, and we need both.

Judges 8:17 · Darby

And he broke down the tower of Penuel, and slew the men of the city.

Gideon had warned Penuel what he would do if they turned him away. Now he is back — and two questions stand out: why the tower, and why fellow Israelites instead of Midianites?

A threat carried out to the letter

Gideon is keeping an earlier promise. One writer looks closely at who was killed.

Then he broke down the tower of Penuel and killed the men of the city (v. 17), likely meaning the leaders among them. We are not told why there was a difference between the punishment given to the men of Succoth and those of Penuel, but no doubt Gideon had a reason for this.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the tower

The tower was not picked at random. It was the town's defence.

Another city in Israel, Penuel, when asked for food, spoke in the same insulting way to Gideon. How sad it is when God's people give no support to those fighting God's battles, and insult them as well! In the case of Penuel, Gideon tells them that when he returned he would tear down their tower. The tower was there to watch for enemy attacks, but Penuel had no interest in opposing the enemy. Then of what use was their tower?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A name that told the truth about them

The town's own name should have shaped its behaviour. Both towns Gideon turned on carried names that pointed somewhere better than their conduct went.

They were Israelites, and they were to share in the victory. What a contradiction to their names! Midian, you remember, is the world and its power. Succoth means "tents." It is a pilgrim word, and men who lived in tents ought to be perfectly willing to help overthrow the power of the world. And Peniel means "the face of God." Men who are looking on the face of God would surely be ready to give all the help they could to capture the kings of Midian, Zebah and Zalmunna. Their conduct makes a lie of their names.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Sitting out the battle is a side

Penuel had not joined Midian. They had only declined to help. The commentary argues that in a conflict like this, declining is itself a position.

They mock Gideon, and so you find that he had no gentle words for them, as he had for the men of Ephraim. Ephraim had taken the field against the enemy, but the men of Succoth were holding back, and were really on the side of Midian. No one can be neutral in a time when the lines between Christ and the world are drawn. No one can be neutral without being on the side of the enemy. "Whoever is not with me is against me," says the Lord. So these men were really as much the enemies of God as Midian; more the enemies, because they were the professed people of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A related reading sees the refusal as a town quietly backing the winning side:

They had confidence in the enemy, and would not compromise themselves by taking part with Israel. There are many in the present day who bear the name of Christ, and yet seek the friendship of and alliance with the world; who, through fear of compromising themselves, make common cause with our enemies.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Two responses from the same man

Earlier in the chapter Gideon answered a complaint from Ephraim gently. One writer sets the two responses side by side.

The men of Ephraim scold him for not calling them to the battle. With them he takes the lower place — the place of grace, the true, wise and godly position to hold towards people who want to be noticed... But he acts very differently towards the men of Succoth and Penuel, who refused bread to men exhausted but still chasing the enemy. They must be shown no mercy. Their refusal of food to the 300, while the 300 fought the enemy, worked against the cause of God and took the part of traitors to His name and glory... Some cases we must meet and deal with in grace; in others we must contend earnestly for the faith.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The mockery came back on them

Penuel's words had been a sneer at a small, exhausted force chasing kings it had not yet caught. The fallen tower is that sneer answered.

We must go on feeling our weakness, confident of victory. In time the tables will be turned. The taunts and insults of the world will bring down judgment on their own heads. One thing the Lord is coming to judge, we are told, is "all the harsh things that ungodly sinners have spoken against him," Jude 15. There is no ridicule of His saints now that will not count as ridicule against Himself in that day.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. Penuel gave no bread to men fighting for them, and mocked them for asking.

- Neutrality. Holding back was not staying out of the fight. It put them on Midian's side — and worse, since they claimed to be God's people.

- Name. Peniel means "the face of God"; their behaviour contradicted the name they carried.

- Tower. Their one defence fell. They had no interest in resisting invaders anyway.

- Measure. The same Gideon who answered Ephraim with grace showed Penuel no mercy. Grace and firmness each have their place — and the kings came first, the reckoning after.

Judges 8:18 · Darby

Then said he to Zebah and Zalmunna, What sort of men were they that ye slew at Tabor? And they answered, As thou art, so were they; each one resembled the sons of a king.

Gideon has captured the two kings of Midian, and his question about Tabor turns a national war into a family matter. Their answer — the dead men looked like Gideon, like royal sons — raises three questions: why that compliment was dangerous, where the likeness came from, and what it pictures.

A crime with no record

Judges never tells the story of Tabor. One writer notes the gap, then questions the ground Gideon took against the two kings.

This killing at Tabor must have taken place some time before, but we have no record of it. They answered that those men resembled Gideon, their appearance being as sons of a king (v. 18). So Gideon tells them they were his own brothers, and if Zeba and Zalmunna had let them live, Gideon would not kill them (v. 19). Gideon may have been too partial in saying this, for these kings were enemies of God, which is more serious than their attitude toward individual Israelites who were Gideon's relatives.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Praise from a beaten enemy

The kings' reply flatters Gideon, and one writer sees danger in it.

The defeated kings praised Gideon freely (v. 18-21), and that praise was all the more dangerous because they seemed to have no selfish motive for it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer weighs what that flattery did to Gideon:

This speech does not appear to have turned Gideon aside from God's path. But he seems to have lost a true sense of the power of the enemy, and to have despised it instead of fearing it… Two things are fitting for us when we fight the enemy. We need fear and trembling about ourselves, and full assurance about God, which shuts out all alarm, for we know that Satan and the world are defeated foes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Where the family likeness came from

Where did that royal look come from? One writer traces it back to Gideon threshing wheat in hiding, and to what he then did with the wheat.

But something very fine is said about Gideon. He threshed wheat in secret, despite all that was going on around him (verse 11). And I think we can infer something more from verse 19 of this chapter. He shared it with his brothers, and the result was that his brothers were like himself; each one "resembled the son of a king."… If we read the Scriptures only in order to give out, it will be a poor thing. But if we read the Scriptures, if we are threshing wheat, there will be one inevitable result: we shall want to share the wheat with our brothers.

Modernised from Ministry in the Church of GodOriginal wording

Marked out by resemblance

Another writer reads the scene as a picture of Christ and His own.

Do we not have a lovely picture here of Christ claiming as His brothers those whom the great men of this world have persecuted and killed? The kings had to admit the likeness that Gideon's brothers bore to him, and the royal dignity that marked them. And do not Christ's brothers carry His own features — traits of moral dignity and beauty that mark them as associated with Him?

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The same writer hears more in the kings' words than a comparison of faces:

The words of Zebah and Zalmunna, "As you are, so were they," remind us of what is said of the children of God, "as He is so also are we in this world" (1 John 4:17). We have been brought before the Father to share the place of His own Son. Like Gideon's brothers, we have a relationship of closest intimacy and affection with Him who is ours. We are "accepted in the Beloved," loved as He is loved, sharing His place of favour and relationship.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The day of reckoning

One writer sets this moment beside Saul of Tarsus, and what the Lord said to him from heaven.

When the time of reckoning came, the enemies of God's people had to acknowledge the true likeness of those they had killed, and Gideon was not ashamed to call them his brothers. Saul of Tarsus had been persecuting the saints of God in ignorance. He had not thought that he was "breathing threats and murder" against the brothers of Christ when he persecuted the disciples of Jesus of Nazareth. But his distress must have been great when the Lord from heaven acknowledged those Saul had been trying to destroy as His brothers — yes, as part of Himself.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Likeness formed. Gideon threshed wheat in secret under enemy occupation and shared it with his brothers, and they came to look like him.

- Likeness seen. Even hostile kings could not miss it: the men at Tabor carried the bearing of royal sons.

- Likeness owned. Gideon claimed the dead as his own brothers — a picture of Christ claiming as His brothers those the world has killed.

- Likeness flattered. In praising the dead men the kings praised Gideon, and one writer warns that such praise is most dangerous when it looks sincere.

- Likeness weighed. One writer judges Gideon too partial here, treating a family wrong as weightier than the kings' standing as enemies of God.

Judges 8:19 · Darby

And he said, They were my brethren, the sons of my mother. [As] Jehovah liveth, if ye had saved them alive, I would not slay you.

Gideon has captured Zebah and Zalmunna, the two kings of Midian, and before he kills them he asks about men they had killed at Tabor. Their answer turns a battle into a family matter: the dead men were his own brothers, and they looked like sons of a king.

The plain sense

One writer walks through the exchange, then questions the reason Gideon gives for killing the kings.

Gideon asked Zebah and Zalmunna what kind of men they had killed at Tabor. This killing must have taken place some time before, but we have no record of it. They answered that those men resembled Gideon, their appearance being as sons of a king (v. 18). So Gideon tells them they were his own brothers, and if Zebah and Zalmunna had let them live, Gideon would not kill them (v. 19). Gideon may have been too partial in saying this, for these kings were enemies of God, which is more serious than their attitude toward individual Israelites who were Gideon's relatives.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Mercy refused, mercy denied

Gideon's words turn on what the kings did not do: they did not spare his brothers. One writer finds the same principle in the meaning of their names.

Zebah means "sacrifice." Here the name points not to the way of approach to God, but to the slaughter that the world delights to inflict on the people of God, without mercy — which is what Zalmunna, "shade," or "refuge denied," suggests. So the same slaughter would come on them, with no mercy to shelter them: "For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy." This victory over Midian becomes the pattern for the final overthrow of Israel's enemies. We see it in the prayer of the suffering remnant (Ps. 83), and in the fulfilment Isaiah predicts (Isa. 9:4).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The family likeness

One writer hears deep feeling in Gideon's reply, and reads the likeness as a picture of Christ and His people.

There is something very touching in what Gideon said to Zebah and Zalmunna, the kings of Midian. He asked what kind of men they had killed at Tabor. Their answer was, "As you are, so were they; each one resembled the children of a king." And is not Gideon's reply full of feeling? "They were my brothers, the sons of my mother." Do we not have a lovely picture here of Christ owning as His brothers those who have been persecuted and killed by the great men of this world? And do not the brothers of Christ have His own features, traits of moral dignity and beauty that mark them as associated with Him?

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Owned at the reckoning

The same writer carries this forward to Saul of Tarsus, who persecuted God's people without knowing whose brothers they were.

When the time of reckoning came, the enemies of God's people had to acknowledge the true likeness of those they had killed, and Gideon was not ashamed to speak of them as his brothers. Saul of Tarsus had been persecuting, in ignorance, the saints of God. When he persecuted the disciples of Jesus of Nazareth, he had not thought that he was "breathing threats and murder" against the brothers of Christ. Then the Lord from heaven acknowledged as His brothers — yes, as part of Himself — those whom Saul had been seeking to destroy. How great his distress must have been.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

How the likeness was formed

Why did Gideon's brothers look like him? One writer finds the answer earlier in Gideon's story, and turns it into a lesson about reading the Bible.

There is something very fine said about Gideon: he threshed wheat in secret, despite all that was going on around him (verse 11)… And I think we can infer something more from the 19th verse of chapter 8. He shared it with his brothers, and the result was that his brothers were like himself; they "resembled the children of a king." If we read the Scriptures only to give out, it will be a poor thing. But if we read the Scriptures, if we are threshing wheat, there will be one inevitable result: we will want to share the wheat with our brothers.

Modernised from Ministry in the Church of GodOriginal wording

The danger hidden in the compliment

The kings' praise did not stop with the likeness. They went on to compliment Gideon's own strength, and one writer sees a trap in it.

This was fresh flattery, and Gideon ought to have protested against it, for he had learned a completely different lesson in the school of God. In reality, his strength was the exact opposite of anything that came from man… In his better days, Gideon would not have accepted this flattery, nor allowed the adversary to plant a seed of self-confidence in his heart.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Likeness given. The dead men at Tabor carried Gideon's own features and royal bearing — a picture of believers marked by the traits of Christ.

- Likeness formed. It grew from wheat threshed in secret and then shared — reading Scripture for yourself, then passing it on.

- Likeness owned. Gideon was not ashamed to call them his brothers; Christ likewise owns the persecuted as part of Himself.

- Likeness avenged. The kings gave no mercy at Tabor, so no mercy sheltered them — and their fall is the pattern for the final overthrow of Israel's enemies.

- Likeness guarded. The same praise turned into flattery about Gideon's own strength — flattery he should have refused, since his strength was never his own.

Judges 8:20 · Darby

And he said to Jether his firstborn, Arise, slay them! But the youth drew not his sword; for he feared, because he was yet a youth.

Gideon has caught the two kings of Midian. Before killing them, he learns that they had murdered his own brothers. He then hands the sword to his eldest son — and the boy is too afraid to use it. Why give a child a soldier's work?

The order and the boy who could not obey

One writer traces the order back to a change in Gideon. He had stopped treating the enemy as a real danger. So he handed a child a task no child should be given.

Gideon does not appear to have left God's path because of this speech. But he seems to have lost a true sense of the enemy's power. He despised the enemy instead of fearing him... Two things suit us when we fight the enemy. One is fear and trembling about ourselves. The other is full assurance about God, which shuts out all alarm. We know that Satan and the world are defeated foes. Gideon realized these things imperfectly. He entrusted to his son Jether the task of killing these two kings. "But the young man did not draw his sword, for he was afraid." In Judges 7 the Lord had separated those who were afraid. He withdrew them from the conflict. Here Gideon handed a child the destruction of an enemy he despised. He did not act in keeping with the ways of God. God does not call those who are only children in the faith to perform public, brilliant actions. A child goes to school, not to war.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Flattery as the real weapon

The same writer looks at what happened next. The kings refused the boy and called on Gideon instead, praising his strength.

Then those kings said, "Rise yourself and fall upon us, for as the man is, so is his strength." This was a fresh piece of flattery. Gideon should have protested against it, for he had learned a completely different lesson in God's school. In reality his strength was the exact opposite of human strength. Did he not know it when the angel of the Lord said to him — the least in his father's house — "Go in this might of yours"? Had he not grasped it on that solemn night? God revealed to him that a cake of barley bread was about to overturn all the tents of Midian. In his better days Gideon would not have accepted this flattery. He would not have let the enemy plant a seed of self-confidence in his heart.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Earlier he states the rule behind it.

Let us distrust the flattery of the world. A moment's thought before the Lord would tell us this: the world flatters to weaken us and to strip us of the weapons we fight it with.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the two kings stood for

Why did these two kings have to die? One writer reads the meaning of their names and finds an answer there.

The name Zebah means sacrifice. Here it suggests not the way of approach to God, but the slaughter which the world delights to inflict on the people of God without mercy. The name Zalmunna means shade, or refuge denied, and it points the same way. So the same slaughter would fall on them, with no mercy to shelter them: "For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy." This victory over Midian becomes the pattern for the final overthrow of Israel's enemies. We see it in the prayer of the suffering remnant (Psalm 83) and in the fulfilment Isaiah predicted (Isaiah 9:4).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The brothers Gideon owned

Gideon called the murdered men his brothers. Another writer takes that as a picture of a coming reckoning.

When the time of reckoning came, the enemies of God's people had to admit the true likeness of those they had killed. Gideon was not ashamed to call them his brothers. Saul of Tarsus had been persecuting the saints of God in ignorance... Think how great his distress must have been. The Lord from heaven owned as His brothers — yes, as part of Himself — the very people Saul was trying to destroy. A terrible day awaits those who have killed the servants of the Lord Jesus. At His judgment seat He will confess as His brothers the saints who suffered oppression, torture and martyrdom for His name's sake.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why the young are spared the front line

Jether's fear was not disgrace; he was simply not yet grown. Scripture elsewhere marks off the same stages, and the youngest are kept out of that particular fight.

Notice those three things. Now you see that a "babe" is not exposed to meeting the devil in this form. Such a one is sheltered, just as in our homes on earth... The infant state is protected by the love that busies itself with the very weaknesses, exposure and inability found in infancy... But when you come to manhood, there you have to meet and face the real obstacles of life; and in God's family the first thing that meets a person when he reaches this state of manhood is the devil — Satan.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Summary

- Strength misplaced. Gideon had stopped fearing the enemy, and contempt for a foe is what put a sword in a child's hand.

- Strength untested. Jether's fear only proved he was a boy. A child goes to school, not to war.

- Strength flattered. "As the man is, so is his strength" was praise aimed at Gideon's self-confidence — the world flatters to disarm.

- Strength borrowed. His real might was never his own: the least in his father's house, a barley cake overturning Midian's tents.

- Strength vindicated. The kings who showed no mercy received none. The brothers they killed, Gideon owned by name — a picture of the day when the Lord will own His own before those who killed them.

Judges 8:21 · Darby

Then Zebah and Zalmunna said, Rise thou, and fall on us; for as is the man, so is his strength. And Gideon arose, and slew Zebah and Zalmunna; and he took the moons that were on their camels' necks.

Gideon's long chase ends here. The two Midianite kings who escaped the battle now die by his own hand. His young son could not strike them, and the kings themselves asked for the blow. The verse holds justice long delayed, a boy's fear, a taunt dressed as a compliment, and the ornaments Gideon carries home.

Vengeance kept for its proper time

The towns of Succoth and Penuel had insulted Gideon on the way. He did not stop to settle that score until the kings were in his hand. One writer sees an order of priority there.

While the work was still to be done, they were taken up with the work and passed on: there is time enough for vengeance when the work is done.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same order holds through the whole chase. One writer sees a real danger in losing it.

Everything in its time for God's witness. Satan tries to confuse us about this, so that he can put obstacles in our way. Zebah and Zalmunna must not escape. Judgment on the rebellious cities will come later.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Judgment measured by their own conduct

Their names, one writer notes, describe what they had done to others — and what now comes back on them.

Zebah means "sacrifice." Here that does not point to the way of approach to God. It points to the slaughter that the world delights to inflict on the people of God, without mercy. Zalmunna means "shade," or "refuge denied," and shows the same thing. So the same slaughter came on them, with no mercy and no shelter: "judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy." This victory over Midian is made the pattern for the final overthrow of Israel's enemies, both in the prayer of the suffering remnant (Ps. 83), and in what Isaiah predicts (Isa. 9:4).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A compliment aimed at the conqueror

"As the man is, so is his strength" sounds like admiration. It praises Gideon's own strength, and that is the opposite of what God had taught him.

Then those kings said: "Rise yourself and fall upon us, for as the man is, so is his strength." This was fresh flattery, and Gideon should have refused it. He had learned a completely different lesson in the school of God. In reality, his strength was the exact opposite of what belongs to man. Did he not know it when the angel of the Lord said to him — the least in his father's house — "Go in this might of yours"? Had he not proved it on that solemn night? God showed him that a cake of barley bread was about to overturn all the tents of Midian. In his better days, Gideon would not have accepted this flattery. He would not have let the adversary plant a seed of self-confidence in his heart.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The praise of a beaten enemy is not harmless. It is a tactic.

Let us be suspicious of the flattery of the world. A moment's thought before the Lord would tell us why. The world flatters to weaken us, and to strip us of the weapons we fight it with.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The son who could not draw his sword

Before Gideon acted, he handed the task to his son Jether. The boy's fear shows a mistake in the father. He had come to think too little of the enemy.

He entrusted to his son Jether the task of killing these two kings. "But the young man did not draw his sword, for he was afraid." In Judges 7, the Lord had separated those who were afraid and kept them out of the fight. Here Gideon handed over to a child the destruction of an enemy he despised. That was not in keeping with the ways of God. God does not call those who are still children in the faith to perform public and brilliant actions. A child goes to school, not to war.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Danger on the side that felt safe

Gideon wins. He takes the ornaments from the camels' necks and rides home a victor. Yet one writer marks this point as the place where the danger changed direction.

In all this history, I am not sure I have said enough about two marks joined together in Gideon: humility and energy of faith. Energy gathered and purified the people for battle and for the pursuit of the enemy. Humility freed him from all self-confidence and led him to depend on the Lord completely. And yet the enemy was about to set a snare for him on the very side that seemed to need the least watching. In the end that brought about the moral ruin of this outstanding leader in Israel.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Finish first. The insults from Succoth could wait; the kings could not. Deal with the enemy while the work is on, and settle the rest afterwards.

- Measure returned. Their names spell out slaughter and refuge denied — and that is exactly what they received.

- Flattery attacks. "As the man is, so is his strength" was praise meant to weaken. It plants self-confidence where God plants dependence.

- Children don't fight. Handing a boy a job he was not ready for showed a leader who had started to despise an enemy he once feared.

- Watch the strong side. Gideon's humility looked like his safest ground. That is where the enemy set the snare.

Judges 8:22 · Darby

And the men of Israel said to Gideon, Rule over us, both thou, and thy son, and thy son's son also; for thou hast saved us from the hand of Midian.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 8:23 · Darby

And Gideon said to them, I will not rule over you, neither shall my son rule over you Jehovah will rule over you.

Gideon has just crushed Midian. Israel offers him a crown — for him, his son, and his grandson. He turns it down and points the nation to its true ruler.

What the Offer Really Was

The men of Israel meant it as gratitude. But their reasoning gave the credit to the man who had held the sword, and Gideon saw where that road ends.

Gideon had earned the respect of Israel. The people who saw the Lord feed the five thousand wanted to take Him by force and make Him king (John 6:15). In the same way, the men of Israel wanted Gideon to reign over them, and his sons to reign after him (v. 22). They thought this was the way to perpetuate the blessing that God had brought to them through Gideon. But this would be confidence in the vessel, not confidence in the Lord. Gideon saw this at once and refused their proposal, telling them the Lord should rule over them, not Gideon or his sons (v. 23).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Handing the Power Back

Gideon refused not only a throne for himself but a family line after him. He did not treat the authority God had lent him as something he could pass on.

Gideon refused this principle absolutely, even for himself or his descendants. He had left the power with Him who had given it, God Himself: "I will not rule over you, and my son will not rule over you; the LORD will rule over you" (Judges 8:23). So too Moses, when told that he could not lead Israel any further than the border of the land, and that he must lay down his leadership, did not presume to name his successor, much less to think of his own son as taking up what he had laid down.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Flattery from God's Own People

Earlier chapters show Gideon tested by enemies and by angry fellow Israelites. This test came dressed as admiration, and writers see it as the harder one.

But we see him exposed to a fresh snare (vv. 22-23). It is no longer the flattery of the world, but that of the people of God… They put their leader in the place of the LORD and offer him the sceptre… None are more prone to clericalism than the people of God. It is not only the curse of Christendom. It is also the natural bent of a believer's heart. When a ministry is blessed, we are apt to treat the servant as a "minister" in the human sense, and so lose sight of God… The aim of Gideon's ministry was that God should have first place, and lose none of His authority over His people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The One Who Also Refused a Crown

The crowd once wanted to make Jesus king. He refused. Writers see the same principle in Gideon.

The Lord Jesus would not be made king by the people (John 6:15). He came in His Father's name, and they would not receive Him that way. He would not be received in His own name… Gideon retires; he will not take the place of rule that belongs only to the LORD. He knows what happens if the people fix their minds on Gideon: nothing but weakness and dishonour. But if they acknowledge the LORD and lean on Him, there will be strength and blessing.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same principle shows up in Paul when believers began to set him up as their leader.

Paul hides himself. He had received great revelations from the Lord, and he had a wide range of knowledge. Yet the moment he sees people starting to set Paul up, he says, "Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom you believed, even as the Lord gave to every man? I planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase"… Had he put himself forward, Christ would not have been seen. This principle was true of Gideon and true of Paul. It is true of every believer who acts in faith.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Request That Followed

The story does not stop at verse 23. Having declined the crown, Gideon asked for the gold earrings of the plunder — and writers treat that request as the undoing of his fine answer.

Great service often breeds self-satisfaction. It also breeds a hunger for honour, which unspiritual people are far too ready to give us. The crowd urges Gideon to rule over them, but he replies, "I will not rule over you… the LORD will rule over you." How could he take the place of the God who had so blessed and honoured him? So far he spoke in the wisdom of the Spirit. But then he asked for the earrings taken from the enemy. That showed a hidden wish to keep a memorial of his own service, even though he had refused the place of power and dignity. What could such a desire produce but a snare?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Credit — Israel looked at the man God had used, not at God, so their thanks came as a crown.

- Confidence — A permanent ruler would have meant confidence in the vessel, not confidence in the Lord.

- Crown declined — Gideon refused the throne for himself and for his sons, and named the LORD as Israel's ruler.

- Christ — Jesus would not be made king by the crowd. Paul hid himself when believers began to set him up. The pattern holds for every servant of God.

- Caution — Gideon refused the throne, then asked for the gold. A hidden wish to be remembered can turn a great victory into a snare.

Judges 8:24 · Darby

And Gideon said to them, I would desire a request of you give me every man the earrings of his booty; for they had golden earrings, because they were Ishmaelites.

Gideon has just beaten Midian and refused Israel's offer of a crown. In the next breath he asks each man for the gold rings taken from the enemy, and commentators treat that one request as the turning point of his story.

After the refusal, a request

Gideon's answer to the offer of kingship was faith at its clearest. His next sentence was not. One writer links the request to what great success does to a person:

Great service often breeds self-satisfaction. It also breeds a wish to be lifted up, and unspiritual people are only too ready to grant it. The crowd urges Gideon to rule over them. He replies, "I will not rule over you; the LORD will rule over you." How could he take the place of the God who had so blessed and honoured him? So far he spoke in the wisdom of the Spirit. But his request for the earrings of his spoil shows a hidden desire to be remembered for his services. He had refused the place of power and dignity, yet that desire stayed. What could such a desire produce but a snare, whether in the form of an ephod or anything else?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The gold of the enemy

The verse explains where the gold came from. These rings came off the Ishmaelites, the people Gideon had just defeated.

Such is man, even the best of men, when left to himself. Here we see the very man who had led his brothers on to victory over Midian now leading them into dark and detestable idolatry. The earrings of the Ishmaelites did what their swords could not do. The loving gifts of the men of Israel proved far more dangerous than the sharp scolding of the men of Ephraim. The scolding drew out a lovely spirit of self-emptying. The gifts proved a snare to Gideon and to the whole house of Israel.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Not greed, but a memorial

Gideon was not lining his own pockets. He meant the gold for a good purpose.

Gideon did not covet these things as Achan did, whose greed brought judgment on Israel. He was noble-hearted and unselfish, and wanted to make good use of the gold. Long before, Aaron had asked for such ornaments and made the golden calf with them. Gideon had thrown down the idols and had no wish to set them up again. But he was full of a sense of his own importance, so he wanted to set up a memorial of his victory at Ophrah, his home town. This memorial was to be an ephod, something God Himself had appointed. It was part of the clothing worn by the priest who represented the people before God. It was indeed a beautiful object, yet in the LORD's eyes it was worthless apart from the high priest who wore it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The crown refused, the priesthood wanted

One writer turns this on the reader. After a deep experience of God, the danger is to feel closer to Him than others are:

He has brought you low and made you learn that you are nothing in yourself. He has broken the earthen vessel to pieces. You have had an amazing experience of nearness to God, and other people look on with wonder... There is the snare. You think you hold a place of special nearness to God, the place of a priest. You begin to want to act as a kind of go-between for the people you may have led in victory and God who is their King. You refuse the kingship, but you want the priesthood... Priestly work belongs either to Christ alone, the unique High Priest, or, if to any man, then to all His people alike, with no distinction among them.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Trying to make the blessing last

The ephod came from an instinct we all know:

Man looks for something to make present blessing last. This has always been one of his crooked ways. "What guarantee have you that it will last?" he asks. Faith answers, "None at all, except the presence of the Holy Spirit." If we try to secure it by other means, then like Gideon we make an ephod... Before long we keep up the form, having lost the power, and we worship the form instead of God. People paid divine honours to Gideon's ephod in just the same way. What is it to have a set of principles, however scriptural, without the power of the Spirit?

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Ephods still get made

The same trap works now, and one writer names its modern forms:

The Christian world is no stranger to ephods. It holds many things God appointed apart from Christ, and imagines it can approach God by them. The church, ministry, baptism, the Lord's supper, even prayer — cut off from their source, they become ephods, and people bow down before them. Form takes the place of God, and souls fall back into idolatry.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Spoil. The gold came off the beaten Ishmaelites, and it defeated the man their swords could not.

- Request. He refused the throne, then asked for a memorial. The hidden wish to be remembered outlived the public refusal.

- Memorial. His aim was good and his object was God-given, yet an ephod without the high priest wearing it was worthless.

- Snare. What we set up to keep the blessing becomes a form that replaces it, and then takes the worship owed to God.

- House. The snare did not stop with Gideon. It caught his own house, and Israel with it.

Judges 8:25 · Darby

And they said, We will willingly give [them]. And they spread a garment, and cast therein every man the earrings of his booty.

Israel has just offered Gideon the crown. He refused it, saying the Lord would rule over them. Then he asks the army for the gold earrings taken from Midian. The people agree at once, and this cheerful, generous moment is where the story of Israel's deliverer turns.

A request made after a crown refused

Gideon's refusal of the crown was noble. What he asked for next came from a different place:

The crowd asks Gideon to rule over them. He replies, "I will not rule over you; the Lord will rule over you." How could he take the place of that God who had blessed and honoured him? So far he spoke in the wisdom of the Spirit. But his request for the earrings of his spoil shows a hidden desire to keep the memory of his services alive, even though he had refused the place of power and dignity. What could such a desire produce but a snare, whether in the form of an ephod or anything else?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Greed was not the motive. One writer names what was at work instead:

Gideon did not covet these things as Achan did, when he brought judgment upon Israel. He was noble-hearted and unselfish, and wanted to make good use of the gold... he had thrown down the idols, and in no way sought to set them up again. But he was impressed with a sense of his own importance, and he wanted to put up a memorial of his victory at Ophrah, his home town. This memorial was to be an ephod, something God Himself had appointed. It was part of the clothing that the priest wore when he stood before God for the people. It was a beautiful object, yet in the Lord's eyes it was worthless apart from the high priest who wore it. Sadly, all Israel looked on this ephod as a way to approach God, and went and bowed down before it. Even Gideon and his house fell into the snare.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The spread garment and the willing hands

The men of Israel do not hesitate. They spread out a cloak and pour their plunder into it — and that eager generosity is the trap. One writer weighs it against the earlier quarrel with the men of Ephraim:

Such is man, even the best of men, when left to himself. Here we see the very man who had led his brothers on to victory over Midian now leading them into dark and detestable idolatry. The earrings of the Ishmaelites did what their swords could not do. The gifts of love from the men of Israel proved far more dangerous than the sharp scoldings of the men of Ephraim.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same admiration that offered him a throne now fills a cloak with gold. Writers note how readily God's people push a servant into a place that belongs to God alone:

They put their leader in the place of Jehovah and offer him the sceptre... The fact that a ministry is blessed tends to make us treat the servant as a "minister" in the human sense, and so lose sight of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Ishmaelite gold turned into priestly cloth

These fighters wore their wealth because they lived as roaming raiders. The size of the pile of gold shows what Gideon had in mind:

Yet in almost the same breath in which he refuses the kingship, he stretches out his hand to take the priesthood. Nothing less can be meant by what he does with the gifts he now asks of them, the rings of the spoil... As warlike nomads it was natural for them to carry much of their wealth on their persons. The use of all this gold shows plainly that Gideon is making a high priestly ephod.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Why a memorial became a snare

The wish to make blessing last is one every generation repeats:

Man looks for something to make present blessing permanent. This has always been one form of his perversity. "What guarantee have you that it will last?" he asks. Faith answers, "None whatever, except the presence of the Holy Spirit." If we try to secure it by other means, then like Gideon we make an ephod. We try to make blessing permanent and to secure it for others. Very soon we keep up the form, having lost the power, and we worship that instead of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What Israel built at Ophrah has copies still. The problem is not the object itself, but the object kept apart from Christ:

Christendom is no stranger to ephods. It holds many things of God's appointment apart from Christ, and imagines it can approach God by them. When the church, ministry, baptism, the Lord's supper, and even prayer are cut off from their source, they become ephods, and people bow down before them. Form takes the place of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Gift — The people gave willingly; the sin in this scene begins with generosity, not theft.

- Gold — Gideon wanted no throne, only a monument. He turned the gold of Israel's enemies into a priest's garment he had no right to make.

- Grip — Admirers are more dangerous than critics: the earrings did what Midian's swords could not.

- Gap — No form can keep blessing alive. Only the Holy Spirit's presence can, and form without power becomes an idol.

- Guard — Even Gideon and his house fell into the snare he made. A good man's memorial became Israel's idol.

Judges 8:26 · Darby

And the weight of the golden earrings that he requested was a thousand seven hundred [shekels] of gold; besides the moons, and eardrops, and the purple garments that were on the kings of Midian, and besides the chains that were about their camels' necks.

Gideon has just turned down a crown. This verse weighs what he asked for instead — and the question the commentators press is what a man does with the trophies of a battle he did not win by his own strength.

Spoils That Belonged to God

Why did Gideon ask for the gold at all?

He wanted some monument to mark his victory. These earrings were the spoils of triumph, and everyone acknowledged they came from the Lord.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What an Ephod Was

Gideon melted this gold into an ephod. The object itself was not wrong; what he did with it was.

He had certainly not asked God about this matter. He clearly thought it was a nice religious symbol of God's approval. How deceiving such a thing was! An ephod was the most important article of the high priest's clothing. It was the garment that held the breastplate with its twelve precious stones (Ex. 39:2-21). But Gideon was not a priest. And God never told anyone to set up an ephod on its own. It was made to be worn.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two Readings of Gideon's Motive

Commentators differ sharply on what was in his heart. Some read the request as a quiet grab at an honour he had just publicly refused.

When they wanted to make Gideon king he refused. But while he refused that honour he tries to grasp another, the priesthood. He gathers the gold to make a priestly ephod and puts it in Ophrah. It became a snare for all Israel as well as for Gideon... The gold was taken from the enemy. It was a self-glorification of the victor Gideon. He and all Israel forgot that the glory belonged to the Lord. Gideon claimed an honour that did not belong to him. The same has been done among Christians: man put in the place of the Lord and His work, and the instruments used in the power of the Spirit of God exalted instead of Him who supplied the instrument.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Others take a gentler view: a local man wanting to honour his home town, whose good intention went wrong.

Gideon took the trinkets with no greedy or ambitious purpose. He acted out of a kind of local patriotism, wanting an ephod for Ophrah, his home town. His aim was no doubt innocent, like that of others who have collected relics for the church, and the result was just as unfortunate. Yet through his long rule he brought no dishonour on his name that would have kept him from a place among the faithful in the letter to the Hebrews.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Gold Where Swords Failed

Refusing the throne did not make Gideon safe. The danger changed shape: it now came from his own people's gifts, not from Midian.

Here we see the very man who had led his brothers on to victory over Midian now leading them into dark and detestable idolatry. The earrings of the Ishmaelites did what their swords could not do. The love-tokens of the men of Israel proved far more dangerous than the sharp scolding of the men of Ephraim.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Trying to Make Blessing Last

Behind the request lies an instinct every generation shares: to build something that will keep a good thing going.

Man seeks something to make present blessing permanent. This has always been one way of his perverseness. "What security have you that it will last?" he asks. Faith answers, "None whatever, but the presence of the Holy Spirit." If we try to secure it by other means, then, like Gideon, we make an ephod. We seek to secure the blessing for others, and in a very short time we keep up the form, having lost the power. We worship that instead of God, just as Gideon's ephod had divine honours paid to it... Such arrangements may spring from a feeling of piety, but they show a lack of dependence upon God. We cannot secure the truth of God by arrangements of our own.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Rival Centre at Ophrah

It pulled the nation's attention to the wrong town.

A monument goes up which can only add to the ruin. So their Ophrah became a gathering centre, and the ephod became the centre of Ophrah. It displaced the divine sanctuary at Shiloh, the true centre of gathering for Israel. Gideon was not a proud man, but his heart was deceived, and he was no longer upright before God. He had set up a "serpent" that would in the end destroy his family. As soon as he died, Israel went back to outright idolatry and made Baal-berith their god.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Victory. The gold in this verse is evidence that God, not Gideon, broke Midian — everyone acknowledged these "spoils of triumph" came from Him.

- Souvenir. Gideon wanted the win remembered, and turned the spoil into an ephod: a God-given object put to a use God never gave.

- Snare. What Midian's swords could not do, Midian's earrings did. Gifts from friends proved more dangerous than enemies.

- Substitute. Form outlived power. Ophrah replaced Shiloh, and a memorial became a rival to God Himself.

- Vigilance. No arrangement of ours can keep a blessing alive. Only the presence of the Holy Spirit can, and the truth of God is never secured by plans of our own.

Judges 8:27 · Darby

And Gideon made an ephod of them, and put it in his city, in Ophrah. And all Israel went thither a whoring after it; and it became a snare to Gideon, and to his house.

Gideon had just refused a crown, telling Israel that the LORD would rule them. Then he asked for the gold earrings from the plunder and made an ephod that drew the nation away from God.

The ephod itself

The ephod was not Gideon's invention. God had appointed it as part of the high priest's clothing. One writer looks at Gideon's motive, and at where the fault lay.

He was noble-hearted and unselfish, and wished to make good use of the gold... but, impressed with a sense of his own importance, he wished to set up a memorial of his victory at Ophrah, his native town. This memorial was to be an ephod, an article of divine appointment. It was part of the clothing the sacrificing priest wore when he stood before God for the people. It was indeed a beautiful object, yet in the LORD's eyes it was worthless apart from the high priest who wore it. Sadly, all Israel treated this ephod as a way to approach God, and went and bowed down before it. Even Gideon and his house fell into the snare.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God meant the garment to be worn, not displayed.

An ephod was the most important article of the high priest's clothing. It was the garment that held the breastplate with its twelve precious stones (Ex. 39:2-21). But Gideon was not a priest. And God never suggested setting up an ephod by itself. A priest was meant to wear it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A refused crown, an accepted monument

Gideon turned down rule over Israel. One writer sees the same desire return in a hidden form.

How could he take the place of that God who had so blessed and honoured him? So far he spoke in the wisdom of the Spirit. But he asked for the earrings of his plunder. That shows a hidden desire to commemorate his services, though he had refused the place of power and dignity. What could such a desire produce but a snare, whether in the form of an ephod or anything else?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Gideon's worst damage came after the battle was won.

Here we see the very man who had led his brothers on to victory over Midian now leading them into dark and detestable idolatry. The earrings of the Ishmaelites did what their swords could not do. The loving gifts of the men of Israel proved far more dangerous than the sharp scolding of the men of Ephraim.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Trying to make blessing last

The urge behind the ephod is a common one.

People look for something to make present blessing permanent. This has always been one form of human waywardness. "What guarantee have you that it will last?" they ask. Faith answers, "None whatever, except the presence of the Holy Spirit." If we try to secure it by other means, then like Gideon we make an ephod. We try to make blessing last and to secure it for others. But very soon we keep up the form, having lost the power, and we worship that instead of God — just as people paid divine honours to Gideon's ephod. What is the use of holding a set of principles, however scriptural, without the power of the Spirit?

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A rival centre

The ephod did not just sit in a town. It moved the nation's centre of worship.

So a monument goes up, and it can only add fuel to the growing ruin. Their Ophrah became a gathering centre, and the ephod became the centre of Ophrah. It displaced the divine sanctuary at Shiloh, the true centre of gathering for Israel. Gideon was not a proud man, but his heart deceived him, so he was no longer upright before God... He had a large family around him, but he had set up a "serpent" that would in the end destroy his descendants.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Ephods now

The pattern did not end with Gideon.

The Christian world is no stranger to ephods. It has many things of God's own appointment apart from Christ, and it imagines it can approach God by them. Separate the church, ministry, baptism, the Lord's supper, or even prayer from their source, and they become ephods. People then bow down before them. Form takes the place of God, and souls fall back into idolatry.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A long record of faithfulness gave Gideon no immunity, and it gives none to anyone else.

It reminds us that we need God to keep us every inch of the way, right to the very end. There is not a moment when we can afford to lapse in vigilance. "Let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall" (1 Cor. 10:12)... We may have been successful at some moment in our lives for the Lord. That does not mean we will be immune from temptation or failure.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Summary

- Gift — Gideon's motive was not greed. He wanted a memorial of his victory, and the snare came shaped like something God Himself had appointed.

- Form — God designed the ephod for a priest to wear, not to display. A right thing in the wrong place became an idol.

- Substitute — Ophrah replaced Shiloh. Whatever we set up to guarantee blessing takes the place of the God who gave it.

- Snare — Midian's swords failed to break Israel. Midian's gold did it, and the rescuer led the rescued into idolatry.

- Watchfulness — Only the Spirit keeps blessing alive. Past victories secure no future step.

Judges 8:28 · Darby

And Midian was subdued before the children of Israel, and they lifted up their heads no more. And the land had rest forty years in the days of Gideon.

Judges 8 ends the Gideon story with a summary line: a beaten enemy, and a land left quiet for forty years. Commentators read that quiet as God's work, not Gideon's. They also watch what Gideon did with the peace once he had it.

Midian broken for good

The verse is final: Midian never rose against Israel again. One writer looks behind the victory to its real author.

Clearly this was a work of God. Its effects reached far, even after the energy of faith that marked its beginning had ceased.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The man God used

Why could God use this man? One writer points to what Gideon wanted and whom he loved.

Gideon was a man of faith, and he holds an honourable place in the list God gives in Hebrews 11. He had God's glory before him as his object, and loved the people of the Lord, and groaned over their low state. So he was a fitting instrument for God to use. God used him with great power to rout Midian completely, so that they raised their heads no more.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A pattern for a greater deliverance

The defeat of Midian does not stay in Judges. Later Scripture reaches back for it.

Scripture makes this victory over Midian the pattern for the final overthrow of Israel's enemies. You see it in the prayer of the suffering remnant (Psalm 83), and in the fulfilment Isaiah predicts (Isaiah 9:4).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Peace that cannot be stored up

Forty years is a long calm. How do you make it last? Gideon's answer was an ephod — a priestly garment — set up in his home town. One writer treats that as the standing mistake of blessed people.

Man looks for something to make present blessing last. This has always been one way he goes wrong. "What guarantee have you that it will last?" he asks, and faith answers, "None at all, except the presence of the Holy Spirit." If we try to secure it some other way, as Gideon did, we make an ephod. We seek to make blessing last and to secure it for others. But very soon we keep up the form, having lost the power, and we worship the form instead of God, just as Gideon's ephod received divine honours. What is a set of principles, however scriptural, without the power of the Spirit?

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same writer states the limit of Israel's quiet in a single line.

The restoration lasted no longer than there was individual energy of faith.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the quiet years produced

Gideon's fighting days were over. Commentators point to two results: a rival centre of worship, and a home shaped by ease.

Ophrah became their gathering centre, and the ephod became the centre of Ophrah. So they displaced the divine sanctuary at Shiloh, the true centre of gathering for Israel. Gideon was not a proud man, but his heart was deceived, and he was no longer upright before God. He lived in his own house and rested from his glorious work. He had a large family around him, but he had set up a "serpent" that would one day destroy his line. As soon as he closed his eyes in death, Israel went back to complete idolatry and made Baal-berith their god, making a demon their chief and "Lord of the covenant."

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

One writer sees the same drift in Gideon's family life.

His huge family and many wives do not suggest the spiritual strength seen in men of faith, even back in the days of the patriarchs. And Abimelech, the son of the concubine, is too closely connected with this coarseness for us to miss the lesson. Ease and self-pleasing give birth to many a fruitful source of evil later on.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Victory — God's. God broke Midian so completely that it never raised its head again, and the effects ran on past the faith that began the fight.

- Rest — given. The forty years of quiet grew out of God's work through one man. God's glory was his object, and his people's low state was his grief.

- Rest — held. Peace lasted only as long as living faith lasted. When Gideon died, Israel went straight back to idols.

- Rest — hoarded. Gideon tried to make the blessing permanent with an ephod. The form outlived the power, and people ended up bowing to the form.

- Rest — pointing forward. Scripture makes Midian's defeat the pattern of the final overthrow of Israel's enemies. The quiet under Gideon points beyond itself.

Judges 8:29 · Darby

And Jerubbaal the son of Joash went and dwelt in his house.

The fighting is over. Gideon has beaten Midian, and the land is at rest. The man who tore down the altar of Baal now goes home, and the rest of his story happens in his household, not on a battlefield.

Peace That Outlived Gideon's Faith

The peace that followed was God's work, and it outlasted the faith that won it. One writer sees a warning in the size of the household Gideon went home to.

Clearly it was a work of God. Its effects reached far, even after the energy of faith that marked its beginning had ceased. His huge family and many wives do not suggest the spiritual strength seen in men of faith, even in the days of the patriarchs. And surely Abimelech, son of the concubine, is tied too closely to this coarseness for us to miss the lesson. Ease and self-pleasing give birth to many a fruitful source of evil later on.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Name That Went Home With Him

The verse calls him Jerubbaal. His father gave him that name after he pulled down an altar of Baal.

The first thing he was told to do was to throw down the altar of Baal and put up an altar to Jehovah, and offer an offering on it. Gideon obeyed, but he did it by night, because he was afraid to do it by day. The men of the city wanted him put to death, but his father protected him, saying, Let Baal plead for himself, and symbolically named Gideon JERUBBAAL, "Let Baal plead."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Household Built Against God's Word

One writer counts who lived in that house, and weighs it against God's word about marriage.

Gideon then lived in his own house, with no more exploits to occupy him. We are told he had seventy sons of his own, because he had many wives (v. 30). He also had a concubine, who bore him one son named Abimelech. God had said, "Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh" (Gen. 2:24). So having more than one wife was contrary to God's will, though many believers in the Old Testament did so.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The name he gave that son shows how far he had drifted.

But as Gideon grew older, his faith grew dimmer, and I fear his pride increased. When his concubine, the servant girl, bore him a son, he called him "Abimelech" (Judges 8:31). And what does "Abimelech" mean? It means "My Father is King." The very place he had refused in his early days he now seeks to seize, and his son's name betrays his sad fall.

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

The Snare Already Waiting Indoors

He had already refused to be king. What trapped him was not a crown but a piece of priestly clothing.

Israel wanted Gideon to rule over them, but he refused, saying, "The LORD will rule over you." He asked the army for the golden earrings taken from the enemy. With these he made an ephod and placed it in his city. All Israel followed it into idolatry, and it became a snare to Gideon and his house. A memorial of God's intervention is not the same as present faith in the God who intervened. The time of victory is a time of unusual danger, when many, being off their guard, have fallen.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The instinct behind it is one that outlives Gideon by centuries.

Man looks for something to make present blessing last. This has always been one of his crooked ways. "What guarantee have you that it will last?" he asks. Faith answers, "None at all, except the presence of the Holy Spirit." If we try to secure it by other means, then like Gideon we make an ephod. We try to make blessing last, and to secure it for others. But in a very short time we keep up the form, having lost the power, and we worship that instead of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The House Israel Forgot

What Israel forgot after Gideon's death, the New Testament tells believers to remember.

Israel was guilty again of not remembering the Lord God who had delivered them from their enemies, and forgot Gideon and his house (vv. 34-35). It is with good cause that Christians are told, "Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith" (Heb. 13:7). Paul speaks here of leaders who have passed away. We are not to forget their faith and their example.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- House won. The victory was God's work, and its effects reached far — even after the faith that began it had cooled.

- House named. He goes home as Jerubbaal, "Let Baal plead" — the name he earned the night he tore down Baal's altar.

- House filled. Many wives and a concubine filled that home with seventy sons and one Abimelech — a pattern one writer calls contrary to God's will.

- House snared. The golden ephod tried to make past blessing permanent. A memorial of God's help is not the same as present faith in God.

- House forgotten. He died, Israel ran back to the Baals, and forgot the house he left behind. Scripture tells believers to do the opposite: remember your leaders and imitate their faith.

Judges 8:30 · Darby

Now Gideon had seventy sons who had come out of his loins, for he had many wives.

Judges 8 closes the story of the man God used to break Midian. It then turns from the battlefield to his home. The note about seventy sons and many wives is not praise for Gideon's success. It is the first warning of a family that would destroy itself in the next chapter.

From the Battlefield to the House

The fighting is over, and Gideon settles down at home. One writer sees a large family around him — and a danger Gideon had set up himself.

He was not a proud man, but his heart was deceived, and he was no longer upright before God. He lived in his own house (v. 29) and rested from his glorious labours. He was surrounded by a large family, but he had set up a "serpent" that would in the end destroy his own line.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Many Wives, One Rule

The verse gives the reason for seventy sons: many wives. One writer measures that against the rule God gave at creation.

Gideon then lived in his own house, with no more exploits to occupy him. We are told he had seventy sons, his own offspring, because he had many wives (v. 30), as well as having a concubine who bore him one son named Abimelech. God had said, "Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh" (Gen. 2:24), so having more than one wife was contrary to God's will, though many believers in the Old Testament did so.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ease After Victory

One writer reads the size of this household as a sign of Gideon's spiritual state, not just a family statistic.

His enormous family and many wives do not suggest the spiritual vigour seen in men of faith, even in the days of the patriarchs. And Abimelech, son of the concubine, is tied too closely to this coarseness for us to miss the lesson. Ease and self-pleasing give birth to many a fruitful source of evil later on.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Question for Fathers

Seventy sons raises a practical question. One writer sets Gideon beside other leaders in Israel with large families.

Among earlier rulers in Israel we read that Gideon had seventy sons (Judges 8:30). Jair had thirty (Judges 10:4). Abdon had forty (Judges 12:14). Rehoboam had twenty-eight sons and sixty daughters (2 Chron. 11:21). Such numbers are large. How could one father care for them all? … Children are a great responsibility entrusted to us by God. It was never His original intention that our children should be brought up by others.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Where the Seventy Ended

The story of these seventy sons ends in the next chapter. One writer asks whether their deaths had a cause, and finds it here.

We can hardly pass by the tragic end of Gideon's sons, seventy men, killed on one stone. It seems strange, when we remember the bright beginning of Gideon's story. But was there not a cause? … It was Abimelech, "the son of his maidservant" (Judges 9:18), who murdered his seventy brothers. We read that Gideon "had many wives." This in itself was not of God; but it made it still more inexcusable that he should take his maidservant as concubine. It was the gratifying of this lust that caused the death of all these sons of Gideon.

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

A Snare Inside the Victory

Gideon's greatest victory did not protect his house. One writer traces how the danger got in.

How often we see that the result of the victory of faith is too great for the faith that won it! Gideon refused to reign himself, and refused it for his son: the LORD, he said, would rule over them. But he asked for the gold earrings taken from the enemy, and made an ephod of them, and put it in his city, Ophrah. All Israel went there and prostituted themselves after it, and it became a snare to Gideon and to his house. Peace followed, and Gideon died at a good old age, leaving seventy sons, besides one born of a concubine.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Victory — Gideon's faith brought Midian down. But the fruit of such a victory can outgrow the faith that won it.

- Ease — with no battles left, he settled at home. Ease and self-pleasing breed evil that shows up later.

- Wives — many wives explain the seventy sons. That broke the one-flesh rule God gave at creation, as many Old Testament believers did.

- Sons — seventy children raise the question of whether one father could care for them all. Children are a trust from God, not a job to hand to others.

- One stone — Abimelech, the concubine's son, killed the seventy brothers on one stone. The house that self-indulgence built did not outlive its builder.

Judges 8:31 · Darby

And his concubine that was in Shechem, she also bore him a son, and he gave him the name of Abimelech.

Gideon had refused the crown, both for himself and for his son. Yet this verse records a son born to a servant woman in Shechem, and a name that means "my father is king" — the start, commentators say, of the bloodshed in the next chapter.

A household built against God's own pattern

One writer measures Gideon's household against the standard God set at the very beginning:

We are told Gideon had seventy sons of his own, because he had many wives (v. 30). He also had a concubine, who bore him one son, named Abimelech. God had said, "Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh" (Gen. 2:24). So having more than one wife was contrary to God's will, though many believers in the Old Testament did so.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The name that took back his words

Gideon did not just father this son; he named him. The name he chose reverses the words he once spoke to Israel:

But as Gideon grew older, his faith grew dimmer, and I fear his pride increased. When his concubine, the servant woman, bore him a son, "he called" him "Abimelech" (Judges 8:31). And what does 'Abimelech' mean? It means "My Father is King." The very place he had refused in his early days, now he seeks to seize, and his son's name betrays his sad fall… Then he had said: "I will not rule over you, and my son will not rule over you."

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

Commentators differ on who chose the name. Another writer thinks the mother may have given it:

But he rises as king. Someone gave him his name — perhaps his mother, to show his link to the great man of Israel, and to cover the shame of his birth. The name itself, "My father was king," shows how the subtle spirit was at work, whether it was ever spoken out loud or not. That is the very thing that his father was not. His father refused to be king, and said God alone should be their king.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the text says "in Shechem"

The verse also names where this son was born. That detail ties him to two peoples:

Abimelech was the offspring of an unlawful union: the son of Gideon and the concubine in Shechem. He was half Israelite and half Canaanite. Abimelech means "my father was king"; he claims therefore supremacy, lordship over the people Israel on the basis of succession. His father had refused that honor; the illegitimate offspring claims it… And this man who lorded it over the people bears the same name as the Philistine kings.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The mixing went wider than one household. Look at the god Israel chose:

Israel had once again fallen into idolatry, and had taken Baal-berith to be their god. The name means "lord of the covenant." The worship of Baal was at least a sign of a covenant with the Canaanites, whose god he was. The history here gives clear proof of an alliance with the pagan nations… Baal-worship and mixing with the Canaanites are certainly at their worst in the story of crime and bloodshed that follows here.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What this one son cost

One writer traces the killing in the next chapter straight back to this one relationship:

We cannot pass by the tragic end of Gideon's sons, seventy persons, killed on one stone. It seems strange, when we remember the bright beginning to the story of Gideon. But was there not a cause?… It was Abimelech, "the son of his female servant" (Judges 9:18), who murdered his seventy brothers. We read that Gideon "had many wives." That in itself was not of God. It was even less excusable that he should take his "female servant" as concubine. It was the gratification of this lust that caused the death of all these sons of Gideon.

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

The trap was already in place

The family in this verse is the house Gideon left behind. One writer looks past its size to what Gideon had set up:

Gideon was not a proud man, but his heart was deceived, and he was no longer upright before God. He lived in his own house (v. 29) and rested from his glorious labours. A large family surrounded him, but he had set up a "serpent" that would in time destroy his line.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. Gideon refused the crown for himself and for his son, and said God alone would rule Israel.

- Relaxation. He then rested in his own house with many wives, which commentators call contrary to God's will.

- Renaming. The boy's name, Abimelech, means "my father is king" — the very title Gideon had handed back to God. Commentators differ over who chose it.

- Relations. Shechem tied the boy to the Canaanites, and Israel took Baal-berith, "lord of the covenant," as their god.

- Reaping. One son of a servant woman killed Gideon's seventy sons. The "serpent" Gideon set up destroyed his own line.

Judges 8:32 · Darby

And Gideon the son of Joash died in a good old age, and was buried in the sepulchre of Joash his father, in Ophrah of the Abi-ezrites.

Gideon's long life ends in the town where he had set up the golden ephod. The verse reads like a peaceful ending, yet the chapter around it asks a harder question: what survives a man of faith once he is gone?

Rest that God Gave

The forty years of calm before this verse were not Gideon's achievement. One writer traces that rest to God, then names the question Gideon left unsettled at his death.

One verse toward the close of this chapter (Judges 8:28) tells how completely Midian was overcome: "Thus Midian was subdued before the people of Israel, and they raised their heads no more. And the land had rest forty years in the days of Gideon." Clearly it was a work of God. Its effects reached far, even after the energy of faith that marked its beginning had ceased. That brings us to the end of Gideon's life. Notice this too: he seemed to settle the question of kingship. But by raising the question of priesthood, he has in fact raised the question of kingship again, as you will see in what follows.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Ephod He Left Behind

Gideon's death leaves the ephod behind him. One writer asks what it was worth by then.

What use was the ephod now? It had completely failed to do what Gideon no doubt designed it to do. Men of God have meant well, and have tried to make provision for the pure truth. Have their efforts not repeatedly ended in the same way? What we have to look to most is not keeping this or that doctrine in the foreground. It is the ungrieved presence of the Holy Spirit. Let us remember that He is the Holy Spirit, always holding down the flesh. If I have set something up, that something becomes an object to me instead of the Lord. His glory must be the prominent thing.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why Men Build Monuments

Another writer sets the question and the answer side by side as a short exchange.

Man looks for something to make present blessing permanent. This has always been one form of his waywardness. "What guarantee have you that it will last?" he asks, and faith answers, "None whatever, except the presence of the Holy Spirit." If we try to secure it by other means, then like Gideon we make an ephod. We try to make blessing permanent, to secure it for others. Very soon we keep up the form, having lost the power, and worship that instead of God — just as Gideon's ephod received divine honours.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Commentators weigh those forty years differently. The same writer sums up his view in one line.

The restoration lasted no longer than the individual energy of faith.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

As Soon as He Died

The very next verses show the nation turning. What they adopted, and what they forgot, both matter.

Gideon died at a good old age (v. 32). As soon as he died, Israel again went back to their idolatrous worship of the Baals, and particularly Baal-Berith, meaning "lord of the covenant." This speaks of Israel sinking into a covenant relationship with God that is not God's covenant at all. It is only a promise to serve the Lord that comes from the flesh. God's covenant with Israel was the law of Moses, but false lords promote a falsified covenant. So Israel was guilty again of not remembering the Lord God who had delivered them from their enemies, and they forgot Gideon and his house (vv. 34-35). It is with good reason that Christians are told, "Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith" (Heb. 13:7). Paul speaks here of leaders who have passed away.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Remembered for His Faith

The last word on Gideon is not the ephod.

Israel wanted Gideon to rule over them, but he refused, saying that the LORD would rule over them. He asked the army for the golden earrings taken from the enemy. With these he made an ephod and placed it in his city. All Israel went after it in idolatry, and it became a snare to Gideon and his house. Alas, the man of faith who had thrown down the altar of Baal was now led astray by a golden ephod! A memorial of God's intervention is not present faith in the God who has intervened. The time of victory is a time of unusual danger, when many, being off their guard, have fallen. He is called Gedeon in Hebrews 11:32, where his faith is spoken of.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — The forty years of quiet were God's work, reaching further than the faith that first won them.

- Guarded wrongly — Gideon tried to make that blessing permanent with a golden ephod. The monument became the object, and took the Lord's place.

- Gone with the man — The recovery lasted no longer than one man's faith, and his ephod raised again the kingship he had refused.

- Grabbed by idols — As soon as he died, the people took a false "lord of the covenant." They forgot the God who delivered them, and the house of the man He used.

- Grace remembers — The ephod became a snare, yet Hebrews names him for his faith. We are told to remember leaders who have died, and to imitate their faith.

Judges 8:33 · Darby

And it came to pass when Gideon was dead, that the children of Israel turned again, and went a whoring after the Baals, and set up Baal-Berith as their god.

Gideon tore down his father's altar to Baal and refused a crown. Yet as soon as he died, Israel ran back to the gods he had destroyed — so why did the recovery collapse so fast, and who was Baal-berith?

The snare Gideon left behind

The relapse did not begin at Gideon's funeral. He had asked for the gold of the spoil and made an ephod — a priestly garment — and set it up in his own town, Ophrah. One writer traces the drift in a leader's heart:

What a humbling fact, that the leaders of the people should be the instruments to lead them back into idolatry! Often, after a promising start, the heart lets the flattery of the world work on it. The desire slowly grows to matter in the world and be recognised by it... So their Ophrah became a gathering centre, and the ephod became a centre of Ophrah, pushing aside God's sanctuary at Shiloh, the true centre of gathering for Israel. Gideon was not a proud man, but his heart was deceived, and he was no longer upright before God. He was surrounded by a large family, but he had set up a "serpent" which would in the end destroy his line.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Victory outlasting the faith that won it

Gideon won a real victory of faith. The problem was not the size of that victory but what Israel trusted to hold it:

What Gideon asked for becomes a snare to himself and his house. How painful this is! How often we see that the result of the victory of faith is too great for the faith that won it... So the breakdown in the faith that had done such things was plain and pitiful. For it was an effort to keep by a form what only grace can sustain, and grace comes from the same source.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"The Baals" — a plural that measures the guilt

How the word is translated sharpens the charge against Israel:

Judges 2:11, Judges 3:7, Judges 8:33, Judges 10:6, 10 should be rendered "the Baalim" — not one, but many male gods... The article "the", when it is used, brings out how great their guilt was: they left the one God to serve the many, the true God for the false ones.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Baal-berith: a covenant with the wrong people

The name points to a partnership. One writer shows who Israel's partner was:

Israel had once again lapsed into idolatry, and taken Baal-berith to be their god. The words mean "lord of the covenant"... The worship of Baal was at least a sign of covenant with the Canaanites, whose god he was, and the history here gives clear proof of alliance with the heathen... Baal-worship and mixing with the Canaanites are certainly at their worst in the story of crime and bloodshed that follows here.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the emphasis. Another reads the name as a fake copy of Israel's own covenant with God: "a promise of serving the Lord that is merely of the flesh," because "false lords advocate a falsified covenant."

Forgetting the Deliverer, and then the deliverer

Israel forgot two things at once, and the second still speaks to Christians today:

Israel was guilty again. They did not remember the Lord God who had delivered them from their enemies, and they forgot Gideon and his house. It is with good cause that Christians are told, "Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith" (Heb. 13:7). Paul speaks here of leaders who have passed away. We are not to forget their faith and their example.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

No enemy at the gate this time

Elsewhere in Judges, idolatry brought a foreign oppressor. Here the ruin turns inward:

Turning away from God, of course, keeps producing all the wretched fruit of that turning away: bondage and degradation. But here we do not seem to have bondage to any power outside. The internal condition is what is dwelt upon.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What a form cannot hold

One writer weighs what the ephod achieved in the end:

What use was the ephod now? It had completely failed to do what Gideon surely designed it to do. Men of God have tried to make provision for the pure truth. Have their well-meant efforts not ended the same way again and again? The great thing we have to watch is not whether we keep this or that doctrine to the front. It is the ungrieved presence of the Holy Spirit... If I have set up something, that something becomes an object to me, instead of the Lord.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — The collapse started before the funeral. Gideon's gold ephod pushed aside the true centre at Shiloh and became "a snare to himself and his house."

- Speed — Israel turned the moment Gideon died. The reform had never reached the heart, and a form holds people only while the man behind it lives.

- Exchange — Israel traded the one true God for "the Baals," many false ones. They made Baal-berith, "lord of the covenant," their god — a bond with Canaan instead of God.

- Amnesia — Israel forgot the God who rescued them, and forgot Gideon's family too. Thanks to God and honour for faithful leaders rise and fall together.

- Result — This time no foreign oppressor came. The rot stayed inside and broke out in crime and bloodshed — a form cannot preserve what only grace sustains.

Judges 8:34 · Darby

And the children of Israel remembered not Jehovah their God, who had delivered them out of the hand of all their enemies on every side.

Gideon dies, and within a single verse Israel slips back into Baal worship. The cause is not a strong enemy but a failed memory — so how does a nation forget a rescue like that?

Forgetting Runs Ahead of Idolatry

The verse sits inside a refrain that keeps returning through the book. One commentator notes how worn the repetition feels. He also marks what is different here: no foreign army is holding Israel down.

Here again is what we meet so often that one almost grows tired of the repetition... Turning away from God means, of course, that all the wretched fruit of that turning goes on — bondage and degradation. But here we do not seem to have bondage to any power outside. What is dwelt on is the inward condition.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Replaced the Memory

Verse 33 names the god they chose, and the name itself tells the story. Another writer follows the forgetting through to verse 35, where Israel also drops Gideon's family.

As soon as he died, Israel went back to their idol worship of the Baals, and above all to Baal-Berith, which means "lord of the covenant." This shows Israel brought down to a covenant relationship with God that is not God's covenant at all. It is only a promise to serve the Lord, and it comes from the flesh... So Israel was guilty again of not remembering the Lord God who had delivered them from their enemies, and they forgot Gideon and his house. It is with good cause that Christians are told, "Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith" (Heb. 13:7). Paul speaks here of leaders who have died.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Faith That Won the Victory Could Not Hold It

One writer sees here the breakdown of a faith that had already done great things. The mistake was trying to keep the blessing by a form instead of by God's grace.

Here was a clear and sad breakdown in the faith that had done such things. For it was an attempt to keep by a form what only grace from the same source can sustain. How blessed it is for the Christian, and for the church, that the Holy Spirit is present with us for ever!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Monument That Prepared the Fall

Gideon had set up a memorial of his victory in his own town of Ophrah — an ephod, a priestly garment. One writer treats what followed his death as the fruit of that choice.

What a humbling fact, that the leaders of the people should be the instruments to lead them back into idolatry!... So a monument goes up, and it can only add more material to the ruin. Their Ophrah became a gathering centre, and the ephod became the centre of Ophrah. It pushed aside the divine sanctuary at Shiloh, the true centre of gathering for Israel. Gideon was not a proud man, but his heart was deceived, and he was no longer upright before God... No sooner had he closed his eyes in death than Israel returned to unmixed idolatry.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Once Gideon was gone, the thing he had made proved useless. Another commentator asks why such efforts end the same way.

Of what use was the ephod now? It had entirely failed to do what Gideon doubtless meant it to do. Men of God have tried to make provision for the pure truth with good intentions. Have not their efforts ended the same way again and again?... If I have set up something, that something becomes an object to me instead of the Lord. His glory must be the prominent thing. How quickly the church departed from God at the very first, even in Paul's days! "For they all seek their own interests, not those of Jesus Christ" (Phil. 2:21).

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Same Weakness in Us

The failure is not Israel's alone. One writer turns it on us: the danger is not open rebellion, but resting in God's gifts instead of in God.

Are we not prone to forget the Lord our God, to rest in His gifts instead of Himself? Alas! alas! we cannot deny it. We rest in the stream, instead of going up to the Fountain. Mercies, blessings and benefits lie scattered along our path in rich abundance. We turn them into an occasion for self-satisfaction and self-congratulation, instead of finding in them the blessed ground of continual praise and thanksgiving.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Forget first. Israel fell through a failed memory, not through an outside oppressor. The problem was inward.

- Forget, then substitute. What filled the gap was "lord of the covenant" — a covenant relationship that is not God's covenant at all.

- Forget, then discard. Israel also forgot Gideon's family. Christians are told the opposite: remember leaders who have died, and imitate their faith.

- Forget, because a form replaced grace. Gideon's ephod tried to keep by a form what only God's grace can sustain. Whatever we set up becomes an object to us instead of the Lord.

- Forget, unless we go to the Fountain. The cure is not stronger memory of the gifts but resting in the Giver Himself.

Judges 8:35 · Darby

And they shewed no kindness to the house of Jerubbaal-Gideon, according to all the good that he had done to Israel.

Gideon died at a good old age, and Israel turned straight back to Baal. This verse records the second half of that failure: they also forgot the man God used to rescue them.

Two forgettings, one root

The idol they picked had a telling name. One writer ties its meaning to both halves of Israel's failure.

As soon as Gideon died, Israel went back to their idol worship of the Baals, and above all to Baal-Berith, which means "lord of the covenant." This shows Israel brought down to a covenant relationship with God that is not God's covenant at all. It is only a promise to serve the Lord made in the strength of the flesh. God's covenant with Israel was the law of Moses, but false lords push a false covenant. So Israel was guilty again of not remembering the Lord God who had delivered them from their enemies, and they forgot Gideon and his house.

after_note: DELETE

Leslie M. Grant

The name points past the idol to the people who owned it. One writer also notices how often the record calls Gideon by his other name, Jerubbaal.

The words mean "lord of the covenant"... The worship of Baal was at least a sign of a covenant with the Canaanites, whose god he was. The history here gives clear proof that Israel had made an alliance with the pagan nations... The name Jerubbaal, too, is brought up again and again.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Blessing that could not be stored

Why did the collapse come so fast? One writer points to Gideon's ephod, the thing he set up to keep the blessing in place.

Man seeks something by which to keep present blessing going. This has always been one of his twisted habits. "What security do you have that it will last?" he asks. Faith answers, "None at all, except the presence of the Holy Spirit." If we try to secure it by other means, as Gideon did, we make an ephod... God has worked in reviving ways. Men whose hearts overflowed with love to God and to their fellow-men have said, "Oh, we will make this blessing last," and nothing but evil has come of it. We cannot secure the truth of God by arrangements of our own... There was the energy of the Spirit working in Gideon, but it was he who prepared the way for Israel's falling away again.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same point is put in a single line: the recovery lasted no longer than the personal faith that produced it.

The restoration lasted no longer than there was individual energy of faith.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The collapse traced back to the victor

The failure was not only the people's. One writer traces it back to the man who won the victory.

How plain and sad was the breakdown in the faith that had done such things. It was an effort to keep by a form what only grace from the same source can sustain. How blessed for the Christian, and for the church, that the Holy Spirit is present with us for ever! And a form, however well meant, is no protection from the worst idolatry. Instead it paves the way for any and every idol, as we see here after Gideon's death among the children of Israel, quick to forget the LORD and the man He had used to rescue them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No enemy outside the camp

Turning from God usually brings bondage. One writer notes what is different here.

Turning away from God means, of course, that all the wretched fruit of that turning goes on — bondage and degradation. But here we do not seem to have bondage to any power outside. This passage dwells on the condition inside.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The trouble came from inside Israel — from the leader the people chose for themselves.

They are ungrateful to the house of Gideon. War breaks out among them through the leader they set up. Instead of fighting the enemies of God, he only seeks to rule over the people, who are now at peace.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why remembering matters

Is remembering God's servants optional? One writer answers from Scripture.

Scripture, then, not only allows but commands us to remember those whom God has given as leaders of His people. To forget them often means forgetting the truth they brought. It paves the way for that "building the tombs of the prophets" by a godless generation who ignore every warning those prophets spoke... What gives value to the remembrance of a leader is the word of God he was identified with, the message he brought.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Remember God. Israel's first failure was to forget the God who had rescued them from every enemy.

- Remember His servant. The two forgettings come together. Ingratitude to Gideon's house was the visible side of the hidden sin.

- Remember the source. No ephod and no plan of man can store up blessing. Only the presence of the Holy Spirit keeps it alive. Gideon's own try at securing it opened the door to the fall.

- Forgetting rots within. No foreign oppressor appears this time. The damage is inside. A ruler rises who fights God's people instead of God's enemies.

- Forgetting loses the truth. Forget the leaders God gave, and you soon forget the truth they carried. That is why Scripture commands us to remember them.