Judges 5:1–31

Judges 5:1 · Darby

Then sang Deborah and Barak, the son of Abinoam, on that day, saying,

The enemy is beaten, and the next thing Israel does is sing. Their song is the only one in the whole book of Judges, which raises a question: why does God record praise like this at all?

Singing Starts When the Battle Is Won

The song belongs to "that day" — the day of the victory itself.

They were joined together in the action that overcame the Lord's enemies. Deborah directed and Barak followed. The battle was won, the enemies were destroyed, and that was a time for celebration. This is the only song in the book of Judges. To tell the truth, after the death of Joshua, there was not much to sing about! There was much to be sad about. Israel did many terrible things. But in the Bible it is always true: when victory comes, singing begins.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Two Voices Where a Nation Once Sang

Compared with the song at the Red Sea, this one is small — and that smallness is itself part of the message.

The first thing that follows the deliverance is praise. In a day of ruin, though, that praise is surely very different from what it was at the beginning, when they came out of Egypt. The whole nation joined their leader in the song of deliverance; not a voice was silent... What a contrast to Judges 5! "Then sang Deborah and Barak." One woman and one man — two by themselves — two witnesses of a time of ruin. But the Lord is present, and the Spirit of God is there. If these two are the witnesses of the ruin, they can still rejoice and celebrate the greatness of the work of the Lord. Renewal of praise is the mark of a true revival, and the children of God, when restored in soul, feel this as their first need. Deborah and Barak do not cut themselves off, even though not all the people are with them. They acknowledge the unity of the nation. Their praise expresses what all Israel should have given Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Barak's Name Beside Hers

Deborah's name comes first, yet Barak sings with her — and Scripture remembers him for faith.

Barak's faith is like that of many who can follow if another will lead, though they cannot take first place. It is very gracious of God to mention Barak in Hebrews 11:32, among the cloud of witnesses who had become victorious by their faith.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Song That Tells Us How God Saw the Battle

Songs are rare in the Old Testament histories, so this one carries weight beyond the moment.

We come now to Deborah's song of triumph. Barak is associated with her, but the words are evidently those of the prophetess. It is one of the few songs in the Old Testament histories. So we can surely expect it to unfold God's thoughts about the victory.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Answering Those Who Object to It

Readers have stumbled over a song that rejoices in an enemy's destruction. Two writers answer it. One warns that the objection, carried through, would not stop at this song.

Many souls have found it hard to see how the Spirit of God could compose such a song — a song that triumphs more than usual in the slaughter and ruin of the enemy... The same principle that would remove this song and deny that it is inspired would, in my opinion, cut off and destroy the Old Testament itself... The Spirit of God did work. But He worked according to the state of the people of God at that time. Who but an unbeliever can deny the wisdom and the goodness of God in such a guidance?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another points to where the song starts and where it lands.

Some have classed it with the savage battle-hymns and victory songs of pagan nations. They liken it to the wild chant of a conqueror whose thirst for blood has been satisfied by the cruel overthrow of his enemies. Such estimates of this song, so often made by the critics of the Bible, are incorrect. Deborah speaks as a prophetess. She begins with ascribing praise to Jehovah; she ends with Jehovah.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why New Songs Follow Revivals

What happened on that day still happens whenever God revives His people.

Most of the hymns Christians sing today are the products of revivals of one kind or another. A real revival brings the power of the Spirit at work among the people of God, with blessing for the unconverted and blessing for the saints of God. Whenever that happens, we find a rich addition of hymns to the Lord and to God the Father, because of what has been achieved.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Summary

- Victory first. In Scripture the singing starts when the victory comes. This is the only song in Judges, because there was so little to sing about.

- Then praise. Praise is the first thing deliverance produces, and a renewed song is the mark of a people restored in soul.

- Two are enough. One woman and one man sang where a whole nation once sang. Yet the Lord was present, and their praise stood for what all Israel owed Him.

- Followers counted. Barak, who could follow but not lead, is joined to Deborah in the song and later named among the faithful.

- Songs outlast the day. Objections miss that the song begins and ends with the Lord — and every real revival since has added its own hymns.

Judges 5:2 · Darby

For that leaders led in Israel, For that the people willingly offered themselves, Bless Jehovah!

The song of Deborah and Barak opens not with the battle but with the two things that made the victory possible: leaders who led, and people who came forward of their own will. Where does that willingness come from, and why does the verse turn it into praise to God?

One Word, Two Readings

The word behind the first clause is rare, and translations differ over it. One writer works out its sense from the surrounding lines and from a related root:

In Deuteronomy 32:42 and Judges 5:2 the same noun is translated "revenges" and "avenging." It is found nowhere else. What can it mean? The context in Judges helps us understand it. The leaders and people of Israel have won a victory. God is to be praised, the leaders having led, and the people having willingly offered themselves. Two things confirm this meaning: the way the two clauses in Judges 5:2 are built, and the sense of the root when compared with the Arabic, where it means to project, to stand out. So leadership fits the context in both places.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Commentators differ, and some say so openly. One admits the gap between the older reading and the newer one, then explains why he works with "leaders led":

I do not know anything at all about textual criticism and the ancient languages of Hebrew and Greek, and I find it very difficult to understand how the Authorised Version says, "Praise ye the Lord for the avenging of Israel," and Mr Darby's translation says, "For that leaders led in Israel... Bless Jehovah!" But for the moment I would like to use what Mr Darby rendered, that leaders led, and when the leaders led, the people willingly offered themselves. Now this is always true.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

A Song Sung in a Broken Day

Israel had sung a victory song before. The contrast with this one is sharp.

The whole nation joined their leader in the song of deliverance; not a voice was silent. Imagine the harmony of those 600,000 voices... What a contrast to Judges 5! "Then sang Deborah and Barak." One woman and one man — just the two of them — two witnesses of a time of ruin. But the Lord is present. The Spirit of God is there... Renewed praise is the mark of a true revival, and God's children, when restored in soul, feel this is their first need.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why God Is Blessed for It

So why does the praise go to God for what people did?

The reason for praise is what God's grace has produced in the leaders and among the people. God recognises that, and so He encourages His own people, who are so unsteady and weak.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Two Halves of One Victory

The verse names leaders and people in the same breath, and neither half stands alone.

We cannot doubt that there was some connection between the leaders leading and "the people willingly" offering themselves. Confidence in their leaders would produce willingness in the people. It was a good partnership, and without it the battle would not have been so successful. The leaders could not have done their work without a willing people, and the people could not have done it without good leaders.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The same pattern shows up in the church today, where leading means pointing people to Christ:

In a smaller sense we also have those we call leaders, rulers, elders, pastors, overseers — people whose concern is leading, directing or caring for the people of God... these people are leading the saints of God to Christ. They are directing them to His glory, His power and His offices... And so when leaders do this in a spiritual, humble way, subject to the leading of the Holy Spirit and the direction of the Lord, the people will willingly offer themselves; or will they?

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Those Who Stayed Behind

Praise for those who offered themselves raises a question about the rest.

When the Holy Spirit works like this, the usual effect is that the people willingly offer themselves (Judges 5:2). Still, the Spirit of God has shown us that unbelief among the people had kept many of them back. So they lost the display of God's power, and the experience of it. God's judgment amounts to a curse where there was a complete holding back, a refusal to stand with the people in their weakness.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What "Offered Themselves" Means

Others in Scripture offered themselves in the same way, and it always started in the same place:

Paul says concerning the Macedonian saints who had given money for brothers in Judea, "They first gave their own selves to the Lord, and to us by the will of God" (2 Cor. 8:5)... Scripture records that one of Jehoshaphat's officers "willingly offered himself to Jehovah" (2 Chron. 17:16). In all these cases it was God who was uppermost in their minds; they yielded themselves and all that they had to Him, in appreciation of His grace to them.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. Some translate the rare word in the first line as "avenging," others as "leaders led." The second clause and the root's sense of standing out point to leadership.

- Grace. Praise rises for what God's grace produced in leaders and people. He recognises it and uses it to encourage the weak and unsteady.

- Partnership. Leaders could not do the work without a willing people, and the people could not act without leaders. Confidence in the leaders drew that willingness out.

- Cost. Those who held back lost the experience of God's power. A complete refusal to stand with God's people in their weakness met with His judgment.

- Song. Only two voices sang where a whole nation once sang. Yet renewed praise in a day of ruin marks a true revival, and restored souls feel it as their first need.

Judges 5:3 · Darby

Hear, ye kings; give ear, ye princes, I, [even] I, will sing to Jehovah; I will hymn to Jehovah the God of Israel.

Deborah and Barak sing on the day Sisera's army falls. Their song opens by calling the rulers of the earth to listen. Two questions follow. Why does a song of praise summon kings? And why does the singer stress her own "I"?

A song after victory

Singing is rare in the book of Judges. Something has to happen before it starts.

They were joined together in the action that overcame the Lord's enemies. Deborah directed, Barak followed, they won the battle, they destroyed the enemies, and that was a time for celebration. This is the only song in the book of Judges. To tell the truth, after Joshua died, there was not much to sing about! There was much to be sad about. Many terrible things went on in the nation of Israel. But it is always true that in the Bible, when victory comes, singing begins.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Two voices, not six hundred thousand

Compare this with the song at the Red Sea. The difference is hard to miss.

The whole nation joined their leader in the song of deliverance; not a voice was silent. Imagine the harmony of those 600,000 voices, joined as one on the seashore, celebrating the victory the Lord had won! "I will sing to the LORD, for he has triumphed gloriously." What a contrast to Judges 5! "Then sang Deborah and Barak." One woman and one man — two by themselves — two witnesses of a time of ruin; but the Lord is present, the Spirit of God is there... Renewed praise is the mark of a true revival. When God's children are restored in soul, they feel this is their first need. Deborah and Barak do not cut themselves off, even though not all the people are with them. They acknowledge the unity of the nation. Their praise expresses what all Israel should have offered.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why kings and princes are called to listen

Deborah has a reason for calling kings. It has to do with her subject, and with the ground she stands on.

Deborah knows the dignity and nobility of her song. So she calls kings and princes to listen while she sings to the LORD. Under the guidance of the Spirit of God, the prophetess sings of great events. The victory "by the waters of Megiddo" that day points ahead to a far greater triumph over the forces of evil. Of this we read in Revelation 16, where, under the influence of Satan and his instruments, "the kings of the whole world" are gathered together at Megiddo, or Armageddon, "for battle on the great day of God the Almighty."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Invited to hear, but not to sing

The rulers get a hearing, not a part. Older translations read "I, even I, will sing," and that doubled "I" marks off who the singers are.

Praise belongs exclusively to the saints. "I, even I," they say. Kings and princes are invited to listen, but they have no part in the song, for the deliverance of Israel is their ruin.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Shared praise still leaves room for a voice of one's own.

It is a blessed thing to belong to the countless crowd who share one theme and one joy. But it is also blessed to have our own voice and our own personal joy. The more distinct the better. Would the apostle have felt it the same thing to say, "Who loved us, and gave Himself for us," true as it may be, as to say, "Who loved me, and gave Himself for me"? Certainly he would not.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The one who leads the song

One more detail carries weight: the singer is a woman.

It was a woman who raised the song of thanksgiving at Sisera's overthrow. This links our story with the defeat of Pharaoh at the Red Sea, and with the defeat of Goliath in the valley of Elah... Now, at the defeat of Sisera, Deborah sings. This shows the grace of God most beautifully. The woman was the first to fall for the tricks of Satan, and the woman is a picture of the Church — the Bride of Christ, made up of all who have believed the gospel of our salvation. No one will appreciate the Lord's triumph over death and the devil like this ransomed host. From them will rise the fullest and sweetest song of praise.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Victory first. In Scripture, singing follows a won battle. Judges holds only one song, because there was so little else to sing about.

- Song in ruin. Six hundred thousand voices sang at the Red Sea; here two sing — and they sing anyway, on behalf of the whole nation. Renewed praise is the mark of real revival.

- Summons outward. The song is noble enough to summon kings and princes. The field of Megiddo it celebrates points on to Armageddon.

- Singers only. Rulers may listen, but they have no part. Praise belongs to the people God has delivered.

- Sweetest voice. A woman leads the triumph song. Commentators see in her a picture of the Church, whose praise will one day be the fullest of all.

Judges 5:4 · Darby

Jehovah, when thou wentest forth from Seir, When thou marchedst out of the fields of Edom, The earth trembled, and the heavens dropped, Yea, the clouds dropped water.

Deborah's victory song does not start with the battle she has just won. It starts with the Lord Himself marching out of Edom long before her day, with the earth shaking and the clouds pouring rain — so why does she reach back that far?

The march out of Edom

The place names are not decoration. They mark the moment Israel came out of the desert, and the moment the nations had reason to be afraid.

His power had certainly been known when He came out from Edom in the middle of Israel. Edom is singled out, because that is where the people came out at the end of their desert journey, to threaten the nations with their might — a might that was not their own. For the earth quaked, and the heavens dropped at the presence of Jehovah, Israel's God... Now, awake again to the blessing of obedience, they had given themselves to their Saviour-God, and He who had declared Himself "forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin" had stepped in and delivered them.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The verse names a direction, not just a place.

Jehovah going out from Seir shows which way the cloud of glory appeared. The marching tells of Jehovah leading His army. Rahab told the spies that "the fear of you has fallen upon us, and that all the inhabitants of the land melt away before you."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Majesty that shrinks the enemy

The song opens by praising God for deliverance through leaders and a willing people. It does not stay with them.

First of all we have the general theme: praise to God for deliverance through leaders who, with a willing people, offered themselves for the work. But at once the thought turns to Him who is the source of all victory, Jehovah Himself. We see Him in His majesty as He came out from Edom, leading His people, as we might say, on to victory after their desert journey... Straight away the soul is lifted into an atmosphere of majesty. How small the things of the flesh look, how weak the mightiest enemy, in the presence of a majesty that is divine.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Terror to some, refreshment to others

The same presence did two opposite things, depending on who was standing there.

The peoples trembled, and their great men quaked, because of Jehovah, the God of Israel. But for Israel there was the refreshment of God's presence, shown in rain from the clouds of heaven.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why rain? Because of the word the verse uses for "dropped."

The word is used for "rain," as in Judges 5:4: "the clouds dropped water"... and related to this is the thought of anything flowing out, as in "the mountains shall drip sweet wine" (Amos 9:13). Growing out of this, or close to it, the same word describes speech as pouring out.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why recovery starts at the beginning

Deborah sings in a ruined country, and her mind goes straight back to the beginning. Writers see a rule for recovery in that.

These words recall the beginning of Moses' song in Deuteronomy 33, to which Psalm 68:7-8 also refers. In these we find another important principle of revival. Souls are led back to the first blessings, seeking again what God gave at the beginning. Instead of being guided by what passed before their eyes, they ask themselves, "What has God wrought?" This is our safeguard in a day of ruin.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A pattern repeated across Scripture

Deborah is not the only one who sings of this march. It runs through other parts of Scripture, and it points forward.

Deuteronomy 33:2 says that the Lord came from Sinai, out of Seir and from Paran to deliver His people and to give them the law. According to Judges 5:4 Deborah sang about the Lord's intervention, coming from Seir, to destroy the enemies of His people. We find the same in Psalm 18:8-20, but there it has more to do with the enemies of the last days. Psalm 68 links the deliverance out of Egypt with the deliverance of the people in the last days. Psalm 77 draws from the deliverance out of Egypt the confidence that the Lord will deliver His people in the time of the Great Tribulation. And so, all these portions, just as Habakkuk's prayer, sing of God's past intervention to save His people as a pledge of the deliverance in the last days.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- He marches. Seir and Edom mark where Israel left the desert. The verse shows the Lord at the head of His army.

- He, not they. The might that frightened the nations was never Israel's own. Deborah turns from the leaders and the willing people to the source of all victory.

- Earth trembles. In the presence of that majesty, the strongest enemy on the field becomes a small thing.

- Heavens drop. The word is the ordinary word for rain: the same presence that shook the nations refreshed His own people.

- Faith looks back. Recovery in a ruined day starts with one question: what did God do at the beginning? That past rescue is the pledge of the rescue still to come.

Judges 5:5 · Darby

The mountains quaked before the face of Jehovah, That Sinai, from before Jehovah the God of Israel.

Deborah and Barak sing after a victory, yet their song does not begin with the battle. It begins with God coming from Seir, the earth quaking and the heavens pouring down — so why does a fresh victory send the singers back to a mountain in the desert?

The Song Lifts the Eye to God

Before the song names a single warrior, the praise turns to the God who won the fight. It sets Him against the desert journey and the mountain where He entered into covenant with Israel.

First comes the general theme: praise to God for deliverance through leaders who offered themselves for the work, along with a willing people. But at once the thought turns to the source of all victory, Jehovah Himself. We see Him in His majesty as He came out from Edom, leading His people on to victory after their desert journey. That majesty is tied to Mount Sinai too, where He gave the law and entered into covenant with them. At once the soul is lifted into that atmosphere of majesty. How small the things of the flesh look, and how weak the mightiest enemy, in the presence of a majesty that is divine.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why Sinai Is Singled Out

Deborah does not say "the mountains" and leave it there. She names one in particular. One writer takes that mountain as a picture of where authority over Israel came from.

"The mountains quaked before the LORD" (v. 5). Mountains stand for authorities, and that includes Mount Sinai, which expresses the authority of law over Israel. God showed His awesome majesty when He gave the law. "Now Mount Sinai was wrapped in smoke because the LORD had descended on it in fire. The smoke of it went up like the smoke of a kiln, and the whole mountain trembled greatly" (Ex. 19:18). Who will not fear before a God of such magnificent power and splendor?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Shaking Marks What Is Temporary

The quaking is not only a display of power. One writer reads it as a clue about the law given there.

At Sinai, in Exodus 19, the whole mountain quaked greatly at the presence of the Lord of the whole earth, when, among countless angels, a fiery law went out for His people Israel. The mountain quaked because the Lord was showing Himself in connection with something that was only for a time and would be set aside. There is no quaking in that which remains.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Sinai Held the Secret of Israel's Strength

Edom and Sinai are not random landmarks. One writer ties each one to a moment in Israel's story.

His power had already been known when He came out from Edom in the midst of Israel. Edom gets special mention, because that is where the people came out at the end of their wilderness journey, ready to threaten the nations with their might. That might was not their own. The earth quaked and the heavens poured down at the presence of Jehovah, Israel's God. Sinai, before this, had done so, where Israel had come into covenant with Him; and there the secret of their strength and the conditions of its continuance had been declared.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Recovery Always Looks Backwards First

One writer sees this reaching back as the mark of real revival. It also answers the advice that believers should fit in with their own age.

These words recall the beginning of Moses' song in Deut. 33, to which Ps. 68:7-8 also refers. In these we find another important principle of the revival. Souls are led back to the first blessings, seeking again what God gave at the beginning. Instead of being guided by what passed before their eyes, they ask themselves, "What has God wrought?" This is our safeguard in a day of ruin. Let us not say, like unfaithful Christians, we should adapt ourselves to the time in which we live.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

An Old Rescue as a Promise of a Coming One

Deborah's picture belongs to a family of songs. One writer reads them all as pointing forward.

Deuteronomy 33:2 says that the Lord came from Sinai, out of Seir and from Paran to deliver His people and to give them the law. According to Judges 5:4 Deborah sang about the Lord's intervention, coming from Seir, to destroy the enemies of His people. Psalm 68 identifies the deliverance out of Egypt with that of the people in the last days. And so, all these portions, just as Habakkuk's prayer, sing of God's past intervention to save His people as an earnest of the deliverance in the last days.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Backwards — the song traces a fresh victory back past Edom to Sinai, where God entered into covenant with Israel.

- Majesty — lift your eyes to that majesty, and the strongest enemy looks small.

- Authority — the mountain that quaked is where the law came from. Its shaking showed the power behind that law.

- Temporary — things shake when God appears in connection with what will pass away. What remains does not shake.

- Forwards — His coming from Seir long ago is the pledge that He will deliver His people again.

Judges 5:6 · Darby

In the days of Shamgar the son of Anath, in the days of Jael, The roads were unused, and the travellers on highways went by crooked paths.

Deborah's song pauses to look back at life under the enemy. Two names date that misery, Shamgar and Jael, and behind them lies a question for God's people in every age: what happened to the open road?

Two Names That Date the Darkness

The verse names two people from opposite ends of the land. God used both against the oppressor.

Next we see the low condition of the people and the causes of their wretched state, before God stepped in for them. In the days of Shamgar and Jael, no one could use the highways. These two lived in the two parts of the land, the North and the South, and each delivered the people from the enemy in their own way. The people feared the dreaded enemy, so they had to move about over lonely side-paths.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Deborah names two deliverers inside a picture of ruin. God had rescued His people, and the rescue had not stirred them.

And this was in the days of Shamgar, the deliverer of the south, whose victory had not shamed others into faith. It was in the days of Jael, by whom, though only a woman, God had now once more delivered them. It lasted until Deborah herself rose up to be a mother to those who had forsaken their Father-God. How pitifully low this great people had fallen!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The Root Beneath the Empty Roads

The closed roads were a symptom. Behind them lay a choice the nation had made about God Himself.

They had been brought low because of their departure from Him. They had chosen new gods, and so war was in their gates. The land was stripped and desolate. The people were shut up inside the walls of their cities, and they did not dare venture out into the open country. Travellers went to their destination by unused, roundabout paths. The tide of war swept right up to the gates, for Israel was defenceless and unarmed.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What Was Lost When the Highways Emptied

Ridout pictures the ordinary life those empty roads had replaced, and hears in the crooked side-paths the mark of a weak faith.

What a picture of the results of spiritual bondage. The psalmist could say, "He leads me in paths of righteousness for His name's sake." And surely in God's path there should never be fear of the enemy. But here are deserted highways. Once there was busy traffic between city and city, with companies of men carrying the produce of the land to the various places of exchange and returning with gold or goods. Once the families of Israel went in with singing to the place where the Lord had put His name. Now all is emptiness. A lonely traveller, driven by need to move from his place, hides from his enemies by taking his way over lonely paths. May we not well believe that these paths, called "crooked" in the margin, suggest the wavering and uncertainty that mark a weak faith?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Byways: Every Man His Own Route

The highway was where the nation had travelled together. Losing it cost them more than safety.

This is the result of the enemy's yoke. The people could no longer walk safely along the highways, the roads on which all had walked together, because that is where they met the enemy. So the travellers chose the side-paths, each one following the choice of his own heart. Is it not this that also marks the church of God in our day?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Keeping the Highway in the Heart

Grant answers the byways with a psalm about the heart.

This is a reminder of Psalm 84:5, "Blessed are those whose strength is in you, in whose heart are the highways to Zion." The highways lead straight on to a certain destination. So having the highways in the heart speaks of going onward without hindrance towards the goal in glory of being with the Lord (Philippians 3:14). Such a heart is not inclined to turn into the byways. Those winding paths may draw less attention, but they are not the straight paths of faith. Let us be firm in decision, making Christ in glory our one real Object, and not turning to one side or the other.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ over the byways. Some hear fear and hiding in them. Others hear each man choosing his own road.

Summary

- Departure. The roads did not close by accident. Israel chose new gods, and desolation followed their departure from the Lord.

- Dread. Fear of the enemy emptied the open road. A nation that once travelled it lived shut inside its walls.

- Detour. Each traveller left the shared highway for his own winding path. Safety cost them walking together.

- Deliverers ignored. God used Shamgar and Jael in those very years. Their victories still did not shame the nation back into faith.

- Direction. The answer to the byways is a heart with the highways in it: one Object, Christ in glory, and no turning aside.

Judges 5:7 · Darby

The villages ceased in Israel, Ceased until that I Deborah arose, That I arose a mother in Israel.

Before Deborah's song celebrates the victory over Sisera, it looks back. It remembers a land where ordinary life had stopped, and it names the moment that changed. So what had "ceased" in Israel? And why does the song mark the turning point by the rise of a mother rather than a commander?

The word behind "villages"

The Hebrew word here appears nowhere else, which is why translations differ. One writer traces the word to its root and argues for a sense older English versions missed.

To make sense of it, the King James Version in both places adds the words inhabitants of. So what does this word mean, when it is found nowhere else? Its root carries the sense of cleaving or dividing, and so of judging. From there we reach the idea of a ruler, which fits the context: "As for a ruler they ceased in Israel."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Either reading points to the same collapse. If the word means "leaders," the verse mourns that guidance in Israel had run out.

First she remembers with joy the days when the leaders led; then she laments the time when the leaders ceased to be. Where are the leaders today?

Modernised from Norman AndersonOriginal wording

What emptied villages meant

Village life is life without walls. When it stops, people crowd behind defences, and that shows who controls the land.

But when the enemy threatens, or the oppressor rules, the villages must cease. The people must crowd into the large walled cities, either for better protection, or to stop them escaping from slavery. Where are the villages now, the unwalled towns with homes dotted among the trees and nearby fields? They speak of a rest and safety that cannot exist while the oppressor threatens.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer looks at the same empty villages and sees a lost unity, restored only in part through Deborah.

The places where the people used to live in peace, surrounded by their families, were deserted. This visible unity of the people had disappeared until the day Deborah was raised up to restore Israel in part. Is the unity of the family of God any clearer today? A faithful few may act on it, but it no longer exists in full, except to faith and in the counsels of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"Until I arose"

The song makes one woman the turning point. One writer links her strength to where she had been sitting: under her palm tree in chapter 4.

The power of the enemy seems to have brought everything to a standstill; there was no response toward God. But then we read in verse 7, "until I arose; I, Deborah, arose as a mother in Israel." Deborah lived under the palm tree (ch. 4:5). She had the sense of victory in her soul, and with that sense of victory she gathered the forces of God's people, and the enemy was crushed. To know divine love intimately, and to carry a settled sense of the victory of Christ in our souls — these are resources available to us today.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Why "a mother," not "a leader"

The title Deborah gives herself is the surprise of the verse, and its point.

How beautiful to read this! She does not say, "a leader in Israel," but "a mother." It was because of her mother's heart that she was moved as she was, out of care for the people as though they had been her children.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Shame and encouragement

Commentators differ over what her rise says about the men of Israel.

At the time we are speaking of, a woman judged Israel. It was a sign of God's almighty power, for she was a prophetess. But it was contrary to God's ordinary dealings, and a disgrace to men.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer turns the same fact toward encouragement.

"Until I arose; I, Deborah, arose as a mother in Israel" (v.7) — a woman with the interests of the Lord at heart. She was prepared to take this stand. I think that in Deborah there is a great deal of encouragement for the sisters: that they too can stand up, be faithful to the Lord, and do something for Him.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

One person is enough

One writer sums up her story and draws the wider lesson from it.

She became a "mother in Israel," and was a prophetess who judged Israel. It was she who urged Barak to attack Jabin, who had oppressed Israel for twenty years. This led to the defeat of their enemies. Deborah is a beautiful example of how, under God, the faith of a single person can rouse those in deep discouragement into action, and from there to victory.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Ceased. Translators read the rare Hebrew word as "villagers" or as "rulers"; either way, normal life and guidance in Israel had stopped.

- Cause. Empty villages mean an oppressor rules. People leave the open country for the safety of walls.

- Gift. Deborah rose from her quiet place under the palm tree. She carried a sense of victory before the battle began.

- Reach. She called herself a mother, not a leader; care for the people as her own children was what moved her.

- Result. The faith of one person roused a discouraged nation into action, and from action into victory.

Judges 5:8 · Darby

They chose new gods; then was war in the gates Was there a shield or spear seen among forty thousand in Israel?

Deborah's song traces Israel's collapse back to one choice. The people took new gods, and then war reached the city gates. The verse also counts the cost: forty thousand men, and not a shield or spear among them. How did a whole nation end up so defenceless?

Idols first, war after

New gods come first in the verse, war second. One writer reads that order as a rule that holds beyond Deborah's day.

But let us ask why things were like this in Deborah's day, and in our own day. "They chose new gods; then was war in the gates." Ah, it is the old story of hearts turning away from God, and of idolatry, which we have already looked at. Let us remember that war follows departure from our God. That departure may be partial or complete, hidden or obvious. Whatever takes His place exposes us to the attacks of our bitter foes.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What a "new god" is

Departure from God is not only an ancient problem. Would people today really choose new gods? One writer raises that objection and answers it.

This is the result of departure from God. It is a sad result, and it is not limited to God's ancient people, Israel. If we get away from the Lord, and seek the things of this present world, we shall expose ourselves to the enemy. Someone might say, but surely Christians would not choose new gods? But the Apostle John writes to us, "Little children, keep yourselves from idols" (1 John 5:21). Everything that would challenge Christ's right to fill the heart is an idol! And many things have been allowed into the church, and into the Christian's life, that have disputed Christ's claim to reign without a rival.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The gates

The gate was not just the way into a town. It was where the people settled public business. So war in the gates meant the enemy had reached the seat of decision.

If you read the book of Ruth, you will remember the time when Boaz wanted Ruth for his wife. Another man had a prior claim as a closer relative, and the matter had to be looked into. So they went up to the gate (4:1). The gate in the Old Testament stood for the place of administration… At the gates the people met to discuss matters and to settle them according to the mind of the Lord.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

No shield, no spear

The second half of the verse asks a question, and the answer is that no weapons were left. One writer presses the same question on the church today.

"Was there a shield or spear seen among forty thousand in Israel?" No longer were there weapons to combat evil. Where now are the weapons? What has been done with the sword of the Spirit? Where is the power of the Word to resist the false doctrines swarming right in the middle of Christendom? They eat away like a canker. They trample the wonderful name of Christ in the dust… Even the shield of faith has been thrown to the ground. Evil has the upper hand, and the people of God are powerless to withstand it.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Disarmed by the enemy

The two halves of the verse work as cause and effect. Idolatry did more than offend God. It left the nation with nothing to fight with. (The writer below quotes an older translation, which words the second half as a statement rather than a question.)

Israel had foolishly chosen new gods (v.8), and the loss of their defence followed: "not a shield or spear was found among forty thousand in Israel." So Satan injected his idolatrous religion into Israel. In doing so he stripped Israel of any protection against the Philistines and Canaanites. Evil nations use these tactics today. They urge other nations to disarm, telling them this is the way to have peace. But when those nations disarm, they find themselves exposed to the enemy's oppression. But the Lord tells believers to "Put on the whole armor of God" (Eph. 6:11), for the enemy is both deceitful and treacherous.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Owning the ruin

What should those who see this ruin actually do about it?

In the confusion that exists, the faithful are to grasp how great the evil is, and to bow their heads in humiliation. It is not enough to realise our heavenly blessings. God wants us, His people, to know just how much we have dishonoured Him in the present state of things. He wants this so that we may separate from it. If we are in the testimony of God, we withdraw from evil.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Choice — the verse begins with a decision, not a disaster. The people chose new gods, and war followed. Departure from God comes before defeat by the enemy.

- Idol — a new god is anything that challenges Christ's right to fill the heart. John's warning to keep yourselves from idols shows the danger did not end with Israel.

- Gates — war reached the place where the elders settled the nation's affairs. The enemy does not stop at the border; he presses into the seat of decision.

- Disarmed — forty thousand men without shield or spear. Idolatry robbed them of their defence. In the same way, neglect of the Word and of faith leaves believers with no weapons against error.

- Humiliation — The song names the ruin instead of excusing it. Facing how far we have dishonoured God is the first step. Then comes separation from the evil, and taking up the whole armour of God again.

Judges 5:9 · Darby

My heart is toward the governors of Israel, who offered themselves willingly among the people. Bless Jehovah!

Deborah's song looks back on a nation that had lost its weapons and its nerve. In the middle of that ruin she finds something worth singing about: men in authority who stepped forward of their own free will. Two questions follow. What makes service willing, and why does Deborah's heart go out to those who serve?

A Call Answered in a Day of Ruin

Israel had no weapons left. The song's praise rises out of that very weakness, and one writer notes that not everyone who heard the call obeyed it. The older translation he uses reads "governors" where the ESV reads "commanders."

It was in this time of weakness and ruin that the call came from the LORD. Deborah sings in triumph, "My heart goes out to the commanders of Israel who offered themselves willingly among the people. Bless the LORD." And is there not a call from the Lord for faithful men today? No one can deny the ruin of the church. We must take account of it, but it is not a reason to give up. It is a reason to seek to answer the call of the Lord. No doubt many governors in Israel heard the call and did not respond to it. But for those who did answer, Deborah blesses the LORD. The people, as seen in Judges 5:2, "willingly offered themselves"; here, the governors who answered the call "offered themselves willingly among the people."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Where Deborah's Heart Goes

Her words are not distant approval. She puts herself alongside the men she names.

The soul sees what the Spirit of God has done, and joins itself to it. The heart of Deborah is with the faithful in Israel. She takes her place openly with those who offered themselves willingly. She sees what God has done in the middle of the ruin, and says: "Bless the Lord!" She is glad to see this small testimony here on earth among the governors.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Who Produced the Willingness

So who produced this willingness? Commenting on the opening line of the song, the same writer points past the men to God.

The reason for praise is what the grace of God has produced in the leaders and among the people. God recognises that, and so encourages His own people, weak and wavering as they are.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same willingness appears elsewhere in Scripture, and one writer gathers four examples of it.

David said: "Who am I, and what is my people, that we should be able thus to offer willingly? For all things come from you, and of your own have we given you" (1 Chronicles 29:14). Paul says of the Macedonian believers who had given money for believers in Judea, "They gave themselves first to the Lord and then by the will of God to us" (2 Corinthians 8:5). Deborah said of some in her day, "the people willingly offered themselves" (Judges 5:2, 9). Scripture says of one of King Jehoshaphat's officers that he "willingly offered himself to the LORD" (2 Chronicles 17:16). In all these cases God was first in their minds. They gave themselves and all that they had to Him, out of thankfulness for His grace to them.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Authority That Goes Into Battle

The men praised here hold office, and their office does not keep them out of the fighting.

Those who govern must be ready to take part in the conflict when the need arises. They are the ones to whom the Lord has given the grace to care for divine order in the assembly. Timothy was not only to pass on to faithful men the truth given through the apostle Paul. He was also to "share in suffering as a good soldier of Christ Jesus" (2 Timothy 2:3). And to carry out what the Lord gave him to do, he was to "be strengthened by the grace that is in Christ Jesus." Where there is a willing heart, the Lord will supply the grace to serve Him.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Effect on Everyone Else

The phrase "among the people" matters. These men did not volunteer in isolation.

Yet, despite the lack of weapons, Deborah says her heart was with the rulers of Israel. They offered themselves willingly to go into battle with Sisera (v. 9). Their good influence spread to the people as well.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One writer sets out both halves of that order.

The leaders were faithful to their charge. In answer, the people willingly offered themselves to carry out the will of God. Two things are needed if God's people are to prosper spiritually: faithfulness in the leaders, and willingness in the people to do God's will.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Ruin — The call came when Israel was at its weakest. Weakness is no reason to give up.

- Grace — Every willing volunteer is the work of God's grace. He sees it and encourages His own.

- Self — The gift is the person, not just his resources. They gave themselves and all they had to Him.

- Spread — The leaders offered themselves among the people, and their good influence reached everyone else.

- Praise — Deborah takes her place with the faithful, and her song ends where the credit belongs: bless the LORD.

Judges 5:10 · Darby

Ye that ride on white she-asses, ye that sit on carpets, and ye that walk by the way, consider.

In the middle of her victory song, Deborah turns to people who were nowhere near the fighting: the well-off, the comfortable, and the ordinary traveller. Why single out these three, and what are they meant to say?

Three ranks, one summons

The three descriptions are not decoration. Commentators read them as a sweep across the whole of society. Translations also differ over the command itself: "tell of it" in modern versions, "consider" or "meditate" in older ones. One writer ranks the three groups from top to bottom:

The prophetess calls on the different classes to consider what had taken place. First there are those "that ride on white donkeys," the sons of the kings. Then come the nobility who are at ease, those "that sit on carpets." Last come the common people, who "walk by the way." Whether riding, sitting or walking, all are to consider her words. That is, she wants every class to ponder them, at all times.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What the white donkeys stood for

The donkey here is not a poor man's animal. Another writer takes the three groups together and names what they share:

Then the prophetess turns to those who were peacefully enjoying blessings they had got back. She says: "Meditate, you who ride on white donkeys." The white donkey was a sign of wealth and prosperity. The sons of noble families and of the judges had this privilege. It is like an appeal to those who enjoy the fruit of the victory without fighting. "You who sit on rich carpets," those who have the benefit of rest and quiet with the blessings that come with them. "You who walk by the way," those who enjoy the security that has been won. Deborah addresses these people, and invites them to "meditate." They have done nothing in this victory but taste its fruits.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Commentators differ over the middle phrase. Some read it as sitting on expensive rugs, a picture of ease. Others read the seat as a judge's bench.

Judges who stayed out of the fight

Read the second way, the verse turns sharp. These men judged other people's conduct while keeping clear of the danger themselves:

But there were some who did not act on the call of God. Instead, they were riding on white donkeys, sitting in the place of judges, walking far from the noise of the archers. They chose not to be involved, yet were judges. Many today do the same. They can stand back and criticise the way things are done. They think their judgment is very wise, yet they take no part in fighting against the enemy. They are told to speak. What can they say for themselves?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

From judging to telling

The command to speak is not left hanging. The same writer follows these bystanders to the end of the story:

However, in the end they would have reason to recount the righteous acts of the Lord, among the watering places. They would be refreshed and helped by the Lord's blessing, though they were not part of the army. Then, instead of only judging, the clear evidence of God's working would humble them, and they would speak of it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Their speech has one subject. Even the fighters did not put themselves at the centre:

While enjoying the fruits of their victory they do not speak of what they had done, but of what the Lord had done in His righteousness.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A real deliverance, a partial one

Safe roads and comfortable seats can look like everything has been put right. Rossier warns against that, and applies it to any season of renewal:

Do not forget this. However blessed these times were, they were not the restoration of Israel. In the same way, the revivals of our days are not the re-establishment of the church... it was still a time of ruin and of only partial restoration. How necessary it is for the people of God in our days to remember these things!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Spared. Riders, sitters and walkers all hold something they did not fight for: wealth, ease and a safe road won by others.

- Summoned. The song reaches every rank — riding, sitting or walking — and leaves out no class and no moment.

- Searched. The verse finds people who judge the fight from a safe seat: wise opinions, no involvement.

- Speaking. Those told to speak have one honest subject: not their own part, but the Lord's righteous acts.

- Sobered. Peace regained is a real mercy, but not a finished restoration. A revival is not the same as everything being made right.

Judges 5:11 · Darby

Because of the voice of those who divide [the spoil] in the midst of the places of drawing water; There they rehearse the righteous acts of Jehovah, His righteous acts toward his villages in Israel. Then the people of Jehovah went down to the gates.

Deborah's song pauses in the middle of the battle report. It turns to a quieter scene: people gathered at the wells, retelling what the LORD has done. Three questions follow. What are the LORD's "righteous triumphs" — older translations read "righteous acts"? Who is doing the telling? And why does the song end with the people marching down to the gates?

The meaning of "righteous acts"

One writer traces this expression through the Old Testament and finds a settled sense:

In the Old Testament the expression "the righteousness of the Lord" always carries the sense of God's faithfulness to His character and promises, shown in His ways toward a sinful people… [Samuel] then recounts the many times God delivered them, when they cried to Him, despite their sin and disobedience. God sent one judge or deliverer after another to save them from the hand of their enemies (compare Judges 5:11 for the same expression).

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

What the victors talk about

One writer looks at what the victors said while they rested and shared out the spoil:

The victors did not only take their share as they divided the spoil "in the midst of the places of drawing water." There, where they rested and were refreshed, they could also "rehearse the righteous acts of the LORD." While they enjoyed the fruits of their victory, they do not speak of what they had done, but of what the LORD had done in His righteousness.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Words that are hard to translate

The Hebrew here is very short, and translations differ. The ESV reads "to the sound of musicians," while older English versions read "archers" — the wording these writers quote. One writer shows how much translators must add:

"They that are delivered from the noise of archers." Here again, to make sense, the older English version supplies a great deal. In Hebrew we have only two words. Everything turns on the meaning of one participle. Proverbs 30:27 helps us here: the locusts have no king, yet they all go out in ordered bands. So we get the idea of an orderly procession, which fits the context in Judges. We may translate it "more than (that is, louder than) the noise of men marching in procession."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same difficulty runs through the second half of the verse, where the ESV has "his villagers in Israel":

To make sense, the older English version supplies "inhabitants of" in both places. What, then, does the word mean? It is found nowhere else. The root carries the sense of splitting, dividing, and so judging. From that we reach the idea of a ruler, which fits the context: "As for a ruler they ceased in Israel." "The righteous acts of His ruler."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A word to those who stayed out

The song does not speak only to the soldiers. It also turns to the riders, the seated and the walkers, who were far from the fighting.

There were some who did not act on the call of God. Instead, they were riding on white donkeys, sitting in the place of judges, walking far from the noise of the archers. They chose not to be involved, yet they acted as judges. Many today do the same. They can stand back and criticize the way things are done. They think their own judgment very wise, yet they take no part in the fight against the enemy. They are told to speak. What can they say for themselves?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Deborah does not leave them outside the blessing. She calls them in, to think:

It is like an appeal to those who enjoy the fruit of the victory without fighting for it… Deborah speaks to these people, and invites them to "meditate." They have done nothing in this victory but taste its fruits. Only some had fought, and their voices rang out where the spoil was divided, at the places of drawing water.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the victory was not

The same writer warns against reading too much into the celebration. A genuine deliverance is not the same thing as a nation put right:

We must not forget that however blessed these times were, they were not the restoration of Israel… The conquerors could recount the righteous acts of the Lord toward the unprotected cities of Israel. The people had risen up to go down to the gates and face the enemy. Yet it was still a time of ruin and of only partial restoration.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Down to the gates

The verse ends with the people on the move. One writer links their march to the gates with why Israel's villages had ceased:

God had allowed the villages of Israel to cease, because the people worshipped idols, and in the hour of victory this is not forgotten. The victors not only tasted the LORD's goodness; they also spoke of His righteousness. Having considered God's righteous acts, "Then the people of the LORD went down to the gates." In the hour of triumph the people return to the place of judgment. Their return shows clearly that they wanted to walk in the light of God's will, according to His word.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Righteous acts — the phrase means God's faithfulness to His own character and promises. He kept rescuing a people who had failed Him.

- Retold — at the wells the talk is not about what the fighters did, but about what the LORD did.

- Repeated to all — the song reaches the riders, the seated and the walkers. They took no part in the battle, and now they are told to think and to speak.

- Restrained — the joy is real. Yet writers warn that this was partial recovery in a time of ruin, not Israel restored.

- Returning — after retelling God's righteous acts, the people go down to the gates. That is the place of judgment, where they walk by God's will.

Judges 5:12 · Darby

Awake, awake, Deborah! awake, awake, utter a song! Arise, Barak, and lead captive thy captives, thou son of Abinoam!

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 5:13 · Darby

Then come down, thou, the remnant of nobles, [as his] people; Jehovah! come down with me in the midst of the mighty ones.

Deborah's song pauses here to name who came to the battle: a small band of nobles who followed Barak, with the Lord coming down among them. Two questions follow. What does the line mean, since the Hebrew can be read two ways? And who are the "mighty"?

The Translation Question

One writer traces the difference between the two readings to a single Hebrew root. He lets the battle itself settle which reading fits:

Another translation of this verse is as follows: "Then part of the people came down among the nobles: the Lord came down for me among the mighty." The difference of translation turns on the root of one word. It may come from the root meaning to descend, or from the root meaning to rule. The Septuagint connected it with the first. That gives a sense in perfect agreement with the details of the battle. Barak came down from the mountain to the valley (Judges 4:14; Judges 5:15), and the Lord went before him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

That is why the ESV has the people marching down rather than ruling.

A Remnant, Not a Nation

The word "remnant" is honest about how few responded. One commentator turns that into encouragement:

Now Israel is called to come down to the place she was in at the beginning, to fight and to bear testimony in a scene where God is still leaving her. We cannot expect, even in a time of religious awakening, to see all the people come down. It will never be more than "a remnant of the nobles." But how great the privilege, for God reckons this remnant "as His people." In His eyes it is the blessed representation of them. What joy of heart it should be to the faithful to see even one witness separated to God from the mass. However much we may desire it, we must not expect more, for otherwise it would not be a day of ruin.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Nobles and the Mighty

Commentators differ. Some read the nobles as the faithful few who answered the call. One writer reads both titles as the enemy's. He then names the tribes who took their stand, and the one that hesitated:

The nobles and the mighty (v. 13) were those who oppressed Israel, and the Lord came down against them. Ephraim, Benjamin and Zebulun are mentioned favourably, and also Issachar. They took their stand with Deborah and Barak, and willingly went with them into battle. But Reuben was clearly troubled by internal disunity and did not come to any firm decision. There were divisions and great resolves of heart, but these seem to have been like New Year's resolutions that completely fail. How many there are who seem to have real concern, yet never take a decided stand for the Lord!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Either way, the Lord is the One who comes down, and the strong are not too strong for Him.

Nobility Redefined

If the nobles are the faithful, the song is re-ranking Israel. Rank no longer belongs to the well-placed:

Those who had followed Barak are seen as "the remnant of nobles." And Jehovah is asked to come down with the prophetess among His mighty ones. It is the victory of Jehovah, and those who have answered His call are to surround Him, the true nobility of His people.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Coming Down for Me

The last clause is personal — Deborah says the Lord came down for me. The same writer draws the comfort out of that phrase:

And what a portion is ours! "The Lord came down for me against the mighty." Should not that be enough for us? He who has ascended on high is the same One who comes down with us to give us the victory in every fresh conflict.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The line just before speaks to Barak about his captives. Writers read that as a picture of a greater victory:

No doubt Barak leading his captives away comes before us as a picture of Him who secured the great victory over all the forces of evil by going into death. This expression reminds us of Psalm 68:18. It reminds us too of its quotation in Ephesians 4:8-10, and of Colossians 2:15: "He disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Down, not up. The key verb can mean "rule" or "descend." Barak came down from the mountain to the valley, so the battle itself favours "descend" — with the Lord going before him.

- Down to few. Those who answer are only a remnant; a day of ruin will not produce more. Yet God counts that remnant as His people, the blessed representation of them.

- Down to the noble. Nobility here is not position but response. The victory gathers around those who answered God's call.

- Down for me. Deborah's confidence is personal. The God who comes down against the mighty comes down for the one who trusts Him.

- Down, then up. The One who has ascended on high led His captives away in triumph. And He still comes down with His people in every fresh conflict.

Judges 5:14 · Darby

Out of Ephraim [came] those whose root was in Amalek; After thee was Benjamin among thy peoples. Out of Machir came down governors, And out of Zebulun they that handled the staff of the ruler.

Deborah's song turns from praise to a roll call. She names tribe by tribe who answered the summons against Sisera and what each one brought to the field. They answer one question: who came down when God called?

God keeps the record

The victory belongs to God alone. Even so, He keeps count of who came and who held back.

Surely it is God's victory alone. Yet see how exactly He marks the faithfulness of all whom He joins to Himself. And with what holy jealousy He points out the one who lags behind and the one who is indifferent.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Ephraim, faithful on hostile ground

Ephraim heads the list. Other translations read, "out of Ephraim came those whose root was in Amalek." Amalek was an enemy people still living on Ephraim's ground.

There was Ephraim, first in the roll of honour, and those who came were settled in Amalek. They were like those of Pergamos, to whom the Lord said, "I know where you dwell, where Satan's throne is. Yet you hold fast my name, and you did not deny my faith even in the days of Antipas my faithful witness, who was killed among you, where Satan dwells" (Rev. 2:13). The presence of Amalek among the people of Ephraim was the evidence of their failure. Yet despite all the weakness and failure, there were those who proved faithful to Jehovah in the time of testing.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Benjamin, unremarkable and present

Benjamin comes next in the list, among his own people, with no exploit attached to his name.

After Ephraim was Benjamin, among the peoples of Jehovah. There may be nothing outstanding to record of Benjamin, but he was ready to take his place and his part among the people in the time of conflict. Like the Philadelphians of Revelation 3, they may have had "but little power," yet they were faithful. They answered the call of Jehovah in simple obedience.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Machir sends its rulers

Machir was the eldest son of Manasseh. His descendants "were warlike and were the foremost in the tribe" (Morrish Bible Dictionary).

"Out of Machir," the son of Manasseh, "came down governors" — those who administered the law of God. These were ready not only to administer what Jehovah had commanded in times of peace, but to take their part in days of conflict. Those who truly seek God's will among the people of God must be ready to enter conflict for the truth, to "contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Zebulun sends its writers

The last clause names men known by what they carried. Where the ESV has "the lieutenant's staff," the writer below reads "the staff of the ruler, or of the scribe."

"Out of Zebulun" there were "those that handled the staff of the ruler," or of the scribe. The teachers of the law from Zebulun were very different from those who opposed the Lord Jesus when He was on earth. At Megiddo the scribes were brave in standing against the enemies of God. How sad, then, to find this same class attacking the Divine Servant of God with bitterness. They sought to trap Him in His words, and they joined with those who crucified Him. Some are taught the mind and will of God, and they teach His commandments to others. Like the scribes of Zebulun, they should be ready to obey God's command in the hour of danger.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Both the leaders and the led

Zebulun appears twice in the song, and the second mention widens the praise beyond its officials.

The tribe of Zebulun came from the conflict with double honours. First, in Judges 5:14, the leaders of the tribe received an honourable mention. Then in Judges 5:18, the whole tribe — the ordinary people — received the highest praise. This calls to mind the Apostle Paul writing to the saints at Philippi. He addressed not only the saints, but also those who cared for them, the "overseers and ministers." His praise, "I thank my God in all my remembrance of you," was for the leaders as much as for the led.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A place of honour can be lost

Ephraim's top billing here did not hold. By Gideon's day the same tribe is quarrelling because Gideon did not call them.

The men of Ephraim quarrelled with Gideon. In the time of Deborah they had been in the post of honour (Judges 5:14). But since then there had been decline, and Gideon, taught of God, had not called them out. They had fallen to the second rank. That difference made them jealous of what Jehovah had entrusted to their companions. They envied the energy of faith in others and what it produced. "What is this that you have done to us?" Ephraim, taken up with his own importance, thinks of himself instead of thinking of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Called. The song names names. God marks who was faithful and points out who lagged behind.

- Came. Ephraim came down though Amalek still held their ground. Past failure did not cancel present faithfulness.

- Counted. Benjamin brought nothing remarkable but himself. That was enough to place him among the people of the Lord.

- Contributed. Machir's governors and Zebulun's scribes brought their peacetime skills into the battle. Those who teach God's will must also stand for it in danger.

- Cautioned. Zebulun's honour reached leaders and people alike. Ephraim later lost its first place — a place of honour lasts only as long as you keep answering the call.

Judges 5:15 · Darby

And the princes in Issachar were with Deborah; And Issachar, like Barak; They were sent into the valley at his feet. In the divisions of Reuben there were great resolves of heart!

Deborah's song names the tribes one by one. Here it sets two of them side by side. Issachar's leaders go down into the valley with Barak. Reuben stays home, with nothing to show but searchings of heart. The question is simple: when God's people were in danger, who moved?

Issachar at Barak's feet

The verse says two things about Issachar. Its princes were with Deborah. Then the tribe "rushed at his heels" into the valley — older translations read "at his feet." One writer finds two places in those lines: privilege, and subjection.

The princes were brought into Deborah's company, so they stood in the place of greatest privilege. The prophetess had the mind of God, and she was the one who passed it on to Israel. In this respect, they were like Barak. But while they shared Barak's place of communion, they were also subject to him. He sent them into the valley of Megiddo under his command.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The same writer moves from Barak's feet to the Lord's.

Yet, while this high privilege is ours, we must never forget that Jesus is our Lord, and our place is "at His feet." Like Mary of Bethany, we are to stay at His feet: to learn His word, to bring Him our sorrows and problems for an answer, and to worship and adore. In the conflict we are to be "strong in the Lord and in the strength of His might."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Reuben's divided tribe

The ESV reads "clans of Reuben"; older translations read "divisions." One writer finds the split inside the tribe itself.

Issachar took their stand with Deborah and Barak (v. 15), and willingly went with them into battle. But internal disunity troubled Reuben, and he never reached a decided conclusion. There were divisions and great resolves of heart, but these seem like New Year's resolutions that fail completely. How many people seem to have real concern, yet never take a decided stand for the Lord!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Reuben was Jacob's oldest son. One commentator traces this failure back to the man himself.

First of these is Reuben, the first-born and natural leader. But his instability had cost him the leadership, which passed to Ephraim. His character stays with him still, as, sadly, many of us know, and the same wavering and selfishness mark him still.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Resolve that never became action

One writer imagines how the talk in Reuben's tents may have sounded.

You could imagine the elders of the tribe of Reuben saying, "Oh, we must do something about this. We must go over to help our brothers. Remember, we made a promise to Moses that we would help in a case like this. Yes, we will need to gather our army together, get the spears ready, get the swords ready" — but they did not move an inch! There was great resolve of heart to do something, but that was as far as it got. They never did a thing to help Barak and Deborah in this fight against the enemy.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

What held Reuben back

One writer points back to an old choice.

You remember that Reuben, Gad and the half tribe of Manasseh chose the land east of the Jordan as their portion, on the wilderness side. Their reason for doing so was, "your servants have cattle." Here we have the bleating of the sheep still holding them down. There may be divided motives, a stirring of heart to join the noble company of faithful ones. There may be great resolves of heart and great searchings of heart, but there is no real decision. They stay with the sheepfolds, just as Dan stays with his ships and Asher with his trade by the sea.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Searchings of heart while others bled

Another writer weighs Reuben's heart-searching against what Zebulun and Naphtali spent that day.

That was what Reuben gave. His brothers were giving their heart's blood in the agony of that struggle, and Reuben was giving his heart-searchings. Zebulun and Naphtali were risking their lives on the high places of the field, locked in a death grip with a brave enemy. Reuben was among the sheepfolds, searching his heart about what he ought to do — sitting on the fence. I expect he had almost made up his mind by the time the battle was over. Well, it is a convenient way. And he has left many descendants.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What the delay cost

One writer counts what the delay cost.

Reuben missed a golden opportunity. Others were enduring the trials of the conflict and reaping the spoils of victory, while "In the divisions of Reuben there were great searchings of heart." No doubt there were laments and self-judgment afterwards, which were right after such a failure. But these could never make up for the missed opportunity.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Privilege — Issachar's princes stood with Deborah, who had the mind of God. Nearness to God's word comes first.

- Place — Issachar followed Barak into the valley, under his command. Our place is at the Lord's feet, to learn, to bring Him our troubles, and to worship.

- Divided — Reuben's split was inside the tribe. The concern was real; the decision never came.

- Detained — cattle chosen long before kept Reuben among the sheepfolds on the day of battle.

- Too late — heart-searchings are not heart's blood. Regret afterwards, however right, cannot buy back the lost opportunity.

Judges 5:16 · Darby

Why abodest thou among the sheepfolds, To hear the bleating of the flocks? In the divisions of Reuben there were great deliberations of heart!

Deborah's song names the tribes of Israel one by one. When it reaches Reuben, praise turns into a question: the other tribes fought, and Reuben stayed home with the sheep.

Reuben's Older Choice

One writer traces the failure back to a choice made long before Deborah's day.

You remember that Reuben, Gad and the half tribe of Manasseh chose as their portion the land east of Jordan, on the wilderness or earth side. Their reason for doing so was, "your servants have cattle." Here we have the bleating of the sheep still holding them down. There may be divided motives, a stirring of heart to join the noble company of the faithful. There may be great resolves of heart and great searchings of heart, but there is no true decision. They remain with the sheepfolds, as Dan stays in his ships, and Asher with his commerce by the sea.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Word "Sheepfolds"

The word behind "sheepfolds" is unusual. One writer gives its likely sense.

Most now, with the Revised Version, say "sheep-folds," or better "hurdles" — pens or stalls for cattle. The word comes from a verb meaning "to place," and its dual form carries the idea of two things set opposite one another. The reference seems to be to Genesis 49:14 and Judges 5:16, where a word only slightly different in form is used (mishpethaim). Most agree it means "hurdles" or "sheep-folds."

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The writers on this page quote an older translation: "the bleating of the flocks" where the ESV has "the whistling for the flocks," and "the divisions of Reuben" where the ESV has "the clans of Reuben."

Resolves That Never Reached Action

Reuben was not short of feeling. The rebuke is about timing.

Despite his great resolves of heart, Deborah has to say to Reuben, "Why did you stay among the sheepfolds, to hear the bleating of the sheep?" There is a time to be among the sheep — not to get caught up in their bleating, but to feed them and shepherd them, as the Lord commanded Peter. But in the time of conflict we are to wear "the whole armor of God," and to take our share "in suffering as a good soldier of Jesus Christ" (2 Tim. 2:3). Reuben missed a golden opportunity. No doubt there were laments and self-judgment, which were proper after their failure, but these could never make up for the missed opportunity.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A Tribe That Stopped Short

This tribe had a habit of stopping short. Beside what the others gave, Reuben's heart-searching looks like a substitute for devotion.

The tribe carries the disease of wavering permanently. When they came to the Jordan they stopped short, and though they promised — and surely meant — to cross over and fight Israel's battles, they never did. They were the first to be carried away captive. His brothers were in the agony of a life-and-death struggle, giving their heart's blood. Reuben was giving his heart-searchings. Zebulun and Naphtali were risking their lives on the high places of the field, locked in a death grip with a strong enemy. Meanwhile Reuben was among the sheepfolds, searching his heart about what he ought to do — sitting on the fence, as the saying goes. I expect he had nearly made up his mind about the time the battle was over. Well, it is a convenient way. And he has left many descendants.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Comfort That Muffled the Call

Another writer names what kept Reuben back, then turns the question on us.

But look — Reuben hesitates at the border to think it over. Why this indecision? "Why did you stay among the sheepfolds, to hear the bleating of the flocks?" The trumpet calling the people together had no voice for Reuben's heart. He was so prosperous that he preferred to stay and enjoy the wealth he had gained, resting among the sheepfolds. Fellow Christians today, is that our position? Have we been content with "great searchings of heart"? Are we lacking in decision in testimony for Christ?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Price of Staying Home

Holding back has its own cost.

Reuben thought it was far better to watch his sheep than risk losing them while away on the Lord's business. How is it with us? Are we seeking money or souls? Which is it? When we love "to hear the bleating of the flocks" — that is, when our own interests, our business, our families and our worldly success command us — we spoil our joy and do not often "utter a song." Reuben had a chance to be devoted, and missed it.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Choice. Reuben settled east of the Jordan because of cattle. In Deborah's day "the bleating of the sheep" was still holding the tribe down.

- Comfort. Prosperity, not ignorance, kept Reuben back: the trumpet that gathered Israel "had no voice for Reuben's heart."

- Considering. Reuben truly wrestled with the choice — "great resolves of heart" — but resolves that never became action left him out of the battle.

- Cost. While others gave their heart's blood, Reuben gave his heart-searchings. Later self-judgment was proper, but it "could never make up for the missed opportunity."

- Call. The question is turned on us: when our own interests give the orders, we spoil our joy and seldom have a song.

Judges 5:17 · Darby

Gilead abode beyond Jordan; And Dan, why did he remain in ships? Asher sat on the sea-shore, And abode in his creeks.

Deborah's song of victory names names — not only the tribes that fought, but the ones that stayed home, and it asks why. Gilead, Dan and Asher each had a good reason for missing the battle. The song turns those reasons into questions we still have to answer.

Gilead Beyond the Jordan

The first group had settled on the far side of the Jordan, outside the land proper, and was content there. One writer reads their absence as a settled state of mind, not a one-off failure:

Those days were past when Gilead, armed for war, went with his brothers in their conquests of Canaan. Now he is satisfied with his worldly position — shall I say, worldly religion? He is outside the real borders of the land, beyond the Jordan. He feels no further need, and stays where he is.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

What makes the silence worse is that an earlier generation from the same territory had made a promise and kept it:

They were not like an earlier generation who, though they chose to live on the wilderness side of the Jordan, said, "We will take up arms, ready to go before the people of Israel, until we have brought them to their place" (Num. 32:17). Gad, and probably the half tribe of Manasseh, did not even have the resolve or the searching of heart that marked Reuben. They were content to settle down in their own affairs beyond the Jordan, with no care for God's interests in the land.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Distance as an Excuse

Their absence had a reasonable explanation. The fighting was somewhere else.

Gilead stayed beyond the Jordan (v. 17). This was the land they had chosen. They were content not to help the rest of Israel in their conflict. We too may find it easy to excuse ourselves from the conflict of God's people, just because we live a little distance away from them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Dan and His Ships

Dan's reason was trade. One writer imagines the conversation, and notices that the excuse could even be dressed up as obedience:

I suppose he must have said something like, "Well, I am too busy to be taken up with this battle. Let them get on with it. Zebulun and Naphtali are quite able to handle this affair. I have my business to carry on. I have my own affairs to look after. This is righteousness. It does say we are to be diligent in business." It is so easy to quote a Scripture when it suits us. But here was a tribe who had the opportunity to serve the Lord, and they lost it. They stayed in their ships; they looked after their own personal interests.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

Asher by the Coast

Asher's reason was not profit but comfort.

Some, like Dan, seek prosperity in present things; others, like Asher, seek ease and safety, for "Asher sat on the sea-shore, and stayed in his creeks." It is very pleasant to the natural man to rest in the attractive air of the sea-shore. It is very comforting to feel safe in the creeks. But it was completely unworthy of God's people to care for their own interests in a time of crisis, on the day of battle. They had a duty to help in the time of danger. They also had the privilege of showing loyalty to the Lord their God. Dan was like those who hid their light under the "bushel" of business, and Asher like those who hid their light under the "bed" of ease (Mark 4:21).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

(Older translations call these landings "creeks" or "breaches.")

Whose Interests Come First

The problem is not ordinary work. It is what comes first.

You and I will never be worth anything unless we put God's interests first. I do not care who you are; I do not care how little you have to do. You may not be a preacher, you may not be a public worker in God's service; but, my brother, if you make your business more important than God's, you have no wish to engage in conflict for Him. The same is true if you put your household, your family and your daily affairs above the concerns of God's people.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Place. Gilead settled beyond the Jordan, outside the land. He was content there, and felt no further need.

- Profit. Dan stayed with the ships. Fishing and trading mattered more than the battle, and he had a verse ready to cover it.

- Pleasure. Asher sat by the coast for ease and safety — the light under the bed, as Dan's was under the bushel.

- Pretext. Distance, work and comfort all sound reasonable. Each one is still on offer to us today.

- Priority. The song's one test: whose interests come first. Put God's first, and the wish to fight for Him follows.

Judges 5:18 · Darby

Zebulun is a people [that] jeoparded their lives unto death, Naphtali also, on the high places of the field.

Deborah's song stops to call the roll of Israel's tribes, and the results are uneven. Some stayed with their flocks, some stayed by their ships, and two tribes went to the front — which raises the question every generation has to answer: what will a believer risk for the Lord's cause?

Praise After a List of Absentees

The verses just before this one name the tribes who stayed home. One writer walks through their excuses, then notes the turn the song takes:

"Gilead stayed beyond the Jordan." The days were past when Gilead, equipped for war, went with his brothers in their conquests of Canaan. Now he is content with his worldly position — shall I say, his worldly religion? He is outside the land itself, beyond the Jordan. He feels no further need and stays where he is. "Asher stayed on the sea shore." When it was a question of fighting, where was Asher? Taken up with his own concerns, his business. He had not made the smallest sacrifice in them to take part in the Lord's battle. But Deborah does not dwell on the account of evil. Full of joy, she delights in telling every instance of devotedness to the Lord.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Lives Risked for the Freedom of God's People

Another writer names what drove these two tribes, and what their risk won them:

In sharp contrast to Dan and Asher, "Zebulun is a people who risked their lives to the death." They were prepared to sacrifice everything, even life itself, to win the liberty of the people of God. And they have had the rich reward of seeing this written down on the page of inspiration. Naphtali shared Zebulun's self-sacrifice, privilege and honour, for "Naphtali, too, on the heights of the field" put their lives at risk. These two faithful tribes remind us of the believers in Smyrna. The Lord said to them, "Do not fear what you are about to suffer… Be faithful unto death, and I will give you the crown of life" (Rev. 2:10).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Reuben's Heart-Searchings

The same song names Reuben a few verses earlier. One writer sets his choice beside these two tribes:

His brothers, in the agony of that deadly struggle, were giving their heart's blood. Reuben was giving his heart-searchings. Zebulun and Naphtali were "risking their lives on the heights of the field," locked in a death grip with a brave enemy. Reuben was among the sheepfolds, searching his heart about what he ought to do. In the expressive American phrase, he was "sitting on the fence." I expect he had almost made up his mind by the time the battle was over. Well, it is a convenient way. And he has left many descendants.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Leaders and People Commended Together

Zebulun is named twice in the song. One writer weighs both mentions:

The tribe of Zebulun came away from the conflict with double honours. First, in Judges 5:14, the leaders of the tribe received an honourable mention. Then in Judges 5:18 the whole tribe, the ordinary people, received the highest commendation. This calls to mind the Apostle Paul writing to the believers at Philippi. He addressed not only the saints, but also those who cared for them, the "overseers and ministers." The commendation, "I thank my God in all my remembrance of you," was for the leaders and for the led alike.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Courage That Is Missing

One writer turns the verse into a question for today:

Ah, where is such courage today? Where are those who are willing to "lay down their lives for the brothers"? They have only one motive — the glory of Christ in the deliverance of His people. Such men are linked with heaven. In the bold imagery of the song, "the stars in their courses" fight alongside them, while on earth the river carries off the slain.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Same Ground, Centuries Later

The land these two tribes fought for is the Galilee of the fishermen. One writer traces what came out of it:

The fishermen of Galilee have found that fulness which the ancient thinkers always sought but never found. Galilee is the land of Zebulun and Naphtali (Isa. 9:1; Matt. 4:15), the two tribes who long ago "risked their lives to the death on the heights of the field" against the enemies of God. From there rose the great Light that shines on those who sit in darkness and the shadow of death.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Risk. Zebulun and Naphtali risked everything, even life itself, to win freedom for God's people.

- Excuse. Gilead stayed beyond the Jordan. Asher stayed at the shore, taken up with his own business, and made no sacrifice for the Lord's battle.

- Delay. Reuben gave heart-searchings where others gave heart's blood. He made up his mind about the time the battle ended.

- Record. Scripture wrote their courage down. The honour fell on the ordinary people of the tribe as much as on its leaders.

- Light. The ground they risked their lives for is Galilee. There the great Light rose on those sitting in darkness.

Judges 5:19 · Darby

Kings came, -- they fought; Then fought the kings of Canaan; At Taanach, by the waters of Megiddo; They took no spoil of silver.

Deborah's song turns from the tribes who came and the tribes who stayed home to the battle itself. Canaanite kings fought together on the plain by Megiddo, and the scene closes with one puzzling line about silver.

The ground itself

Megiddo was both a city and the valley around it. One writer gives its location, its other name, and what the "waters" were:

City and valley on the borders of Issachar and Manasseh. Joshua conquered it. Later it appears among the cities from which Manasseh did not drive out the inhabitants... The rout of Sisera's army happened in this district, and at Megiddo Josiah fell when he rashly attacked Pharaoh Neco... The valley is also known as "the valley of Jezreel." The "waters of Megiddo" probably refer to the plentiful springs found in that district.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A small place, a great victory

Notice the wording: not one king, but kings. What made the day memorable was not the size of the town but the odds:

It was not that Megiddo was a place of any great size or note. God looks at the principle at stake. Israel was in a low state. The Lord used a prophetess to fill them with courage. Encouraged by her, they won a great victory over their enemies.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No spoils of silver

Commentators differ over which side the last line describes. One reads it of the Canaanite kings, who marched out to plunder and came away empty. That writer sees the same reversal waiting for the world powers at the end. The quote below keeps the older wording, "no spoil of silver":

Like Jabin the king of Canaan and Sisera his commander in chief, the kings of the last days will take "no spoil of silver." Instead of plundering others, they will be plundered, just as Zechariah 14 prophesies.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another reads it of Israel's own fighters, who took nothing for the risk they ran. His older wording is "they took no gain of money":

The song names Zebulun and Issachar in particular as Barak's allies, and as the ones who bore the brunt of the fight. It names Zebulun again with Naphtali, as a people who risked their lives. This was not from selfish motives, for "they took no gain of money."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Who won it

The song describes the battle, but it does not hand the credit to the men who fought:

In verses 19-22 we have another mark of faithfulness. They do not boast in themselves or even think of themselves. They credit the victory to God alone, and proclaim its heavenly character.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The name Armageddon

Two writers connect this battle with the last gathering of the nations. One is cautious about the name Armageddon, but sure about the place it points to:

There may be doubt about the exact meaning of the word Armageddon, but there is none about the fact that it refers in some way to the valley of Megiddo. This is where God overthrew the most powerful Gentile oppressors, when He rose up to deliver His people... This is clearly a fine picture of the great battle still to come. Then Christ will come down from heaven to deliver His people, destroy His enemies, and set up His glorious rule.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

The same plain later saw a day of mourning, when Josiah fell there in battle. One writer explains why the name Armageddon looks back to Deborah's day and not to that grief:

For Megiddo in the day of the Judges was a reminder of joy and triumph to Israel. In the time of Josiah it was a place of gloom; all Judah and Jerusalem mourned for Josiah... For this reason I think that Armageddon — that is, the mountain of Megiddo — refers not to the sorrow for Josiah, but to the gathering and defeat of the Gentile kings in Judges.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Place. Taanach and the waters of Megiddo lie in one valley, also known as the valley of Jezreel. The "waters" are most likely its plentiful springs.

- Odds. Megiddo was no great city. What marks the day is that a people in a low state, stirred by a prophetess, beat a coalition of kings.

- Spoil. Commentators differ on the last line. Some read it of Canaan's kings, who came to plunder and got nothing. Others read it of Israel's fighters, who risked their lives for no pay.

- Credit. The fighters took no money and no glory. They gave the victory to God alone — the mark of faithfulness.

- Echo. The name Armageddon points back to this plain. Megiddo becomes a picture of the last gathering of the nations, where the plunderers are plundered.

Judges 5:20 · Darby

From heaven was the fight; The stars from their courses fought with Sisera.

The song of Deborah and Barak looks back on a battle Israel's soldiers fought at the Kishon. Yet here the singers lift their eyes off the battlefield and describe a war fought from the sky, which raises the question: who really won the day?

Victory Handed Back to God

The part of the song that describes the fighting never praises the fighters. One writer sees this as a mark of faithfulness:

In verses 19-22 we see another mark of faithfulness. They do not boast in themselves, or even think of themselves. They give the credit for the victory to God alone, and declare that it came from heaven.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The song then measures the defeat against the enemy's own strength:

Next comes the battle itself and the defeat of the enemy. Heaven and earth join together against the oppressors of God's people. Above, the stars in their courses fought against them. Below, the Kishon swept them away with its stream. The mighty ones showed what they were by the stamping of their frightened horses. Such is the strength of those who are with God: the mightier the foes, the greater the defeat.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

An Authority Canaan Could Not Reach

Sisera's army could beat anything on the ground. The verse says he met something else. One writer connects this with the men who once demanded to know by what authority Jesus acted:

When the kings of Canaan fought, they found that the heavens fought against them, and the stars. This points to a spiritual authority higher than anything on earth — an authority Canaan was not ready to meet. It was earthbound men who challenged the authority of the Lord Jesus as He acted for God on earth... In the same way, heaven's authority defeated Sisera and his armies. Without this, Barak and his men could not have gained the victory.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The God of All Hosts

Why call the stars fighters at all? One answer looks past this one battle:

Scripture shows that there is a mighty heavenly host, and rulers and powers in the unseen world. God is the God of them all. He is also God of all the forces of nature, which He has often used to punish His enemies. "From heaven the stars fought, from their courses they fought against Sisera."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Another writer reads this as a pattern rather than a one-off:

In the days of Joshua the Lord threw down great stones from heaven on the enemy. In Deborah's time the very stars in their courses fought against Sisera. So it will be in the day to come. His thunderbolts will cause terrible destruction among the enemies of His people (Joshua 10:11; Judges 5:20).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Not a Distant Onlooker

The men who went into that valley on the strength of God's word were not left to manage alone:

Barak and his willing helpers would have been no match for the armies of Jabin. But they went out relying on the word of the Lord... God does not watch the battles of His people as an outsider with no interest in them. At the right moment He steps in with His heavenly resources and wins the victory for His own... And what was true of Israel is true of ourselves: we have never called in vain for the help of the Lord.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Samuel Ridout asks who it is that heaven fights alongside:

Where are those who are willing to lay down their lives for fellow believers, who have only one motive — the glory of Christ in the deliverance of His people? Such men are linked with heaven. In the bold imagery of the song, the stars in their courses fight with them, while on earth the river carries away the slain.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Megiddo and the Battle Still Ahead

The song names Megiddo two verses earlier. One writer explains what that old battlefield pictures:

This is where the most powerful Gentile oppressors were overthrown, when God rose up to deliver His people... It is easy to see what a striking picture this gives of the great battle still to come. Then Christ will come down from heaven to deliver His people, destroy His enemies, and set up His glorious rule... The name Armageddon probably refers less to the place than to the character of their overthrow, pictured in the great battle "by the waters of Megiddo."

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Summary

- Heaven fights. The song credits the win to a battle fought from above. The stars fought, and the fighters claimed no glory for themselves.

- Heaven outranks. Sisera's army could face any force on earth. It could not face an authority above the earth — the same authority that silenced the men who questioned Jesus.

- Heaven commands. God rules the unseen host and the forces of nature. He has often turned creation itself against His enemies.

- Heaven engages. He does not watch His people struggle from a distance. He steps in at the right moment with His own resources. No cry for His help has ever gone unanswered.

- Heaven returns. Writers read Megiddo as a preview of a final battle, when Christ descends to deliver His people and set up His rule.

Judges 5:21 · Darby

The torrent of Kishon swept them away, That ancient torrent, the torrent Kishon. My soul, thou hast trodden down strength!

The song of Deborah and Barak turns from the clash of kings to the ground they fought on. It credits the victory to a stream. What did a seasonal brook have to do with the fall of a powerful army? And why does the singer speak to her own soul?

The Place God Chose

Kishon was only a brook. Its flooding is what the song describes.

A brook that rises in the mountains of Esdraelon. It runs north-west to the Mediterranean, close to Mount Carmel. It was the scene of the victory of Deborah and Barak over the army of Sisera. The song pictures the river as "sweeping away" the enemy, which well describes the rushing torrent. When there is much water it is in places quite impassable.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

God had named the place before the battle.

God had said He would influence Sisera to come to Kishon (ch. 4:7). It may be that the torrent literally swept many of his army away, perhaps because Israel's army had trapped them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Name as a Snare

The name of the stream carries its own commentary.

The scene of the conflict is at the river Kishon, where, at a later day, Elijah killed the false prophets (1 Kings 18:40). Its name comes from a root meaning to bend, and people usually translate it as "winding." Other words come from the same root and are closely tied to it: "a bow" and "to lay a snare." So the name suggests a weapon of war, and the ambush that the schemer himself falls into. Kishon seems to be the place of his own choice for the battle. Into the pit which he had dug for others, he falls himself. Yet all had been foreseen and provided by God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Attacked From Above and Below

The verse before this one puts the stars in the fight. This verse puts the water in it.

Next we have the actual conflict and overthrow of the enemy. Heaven and earth unite against the oppressors of the people of God. The stars in their courses fought against them from above. The Kishon swept them away with its stream from below. The mighty ones showed themselves such by the stamping of their frightened horses. Such is the strength of those that are with God: the mightier the foes, the mightier only is the overthrow.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Nature as God's Weapon

Israel's swords started the rout. The flood finished it.

Divine power was at work unseen for Deborah and Barak. But there was more: "The torrent Kishon swept them away." God stepped in and used the forces of nature to complete the defeat of Jabin's powerful army. … All the mighty power of the enemy is trodden beneath the feet of God's servant who trusts in Him. As for us, we should have no fear of our enemies. God has given us His armour so we can stand against every attack. And "the God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet" (Rom. 16:20).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Word to Her Own Soul

The closing line of the verse is addressed inward. The ESV reads it as a call to march on with might. Older translations read it as you have trodden down strength, and the writer quoted below works from that wording. Read that way, it is not a boast.

The honour had passed into the hand of a woman, for Israel was out of order. Wrongdoing had come in with a disturbing force. The remedy, if it was to come at all, had to come from God's own hand. And so it was. So in her magnificent song she sings — "O my soul, you have trodden down strength." It is a confession that the source of her strength and victory was all in God. In the power of the Spirit, and in that alone, she had fought the battle of the Lord and won.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

A Rehearsal of a Larger Day

Commentators see the battlefield itself pointing forward.

Judges 5:19-22 describes the great battle. It is a great battle mainly because of what it pictures. It was fought at Megiddo, and it pictures the time of slaughter in store for the nations. They will gather at Armageddon, just before the Lord Jesus sets up His kingdom on earth.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Drawn — God had already said He would bring Sisera to Kishon; the enemy marched to a place chosen for him.

- Snared — the name comes from a root meaning to bend, linked to words for a bow and a trap. The ground Sisera chose became his own pit.

- Surrounded — the stars fought above and the stream swept below. Heaven and earth closed on the oppressors together.

- Swept — God used the forces of nature to finish what the swords began. So His servants need not fear their foes.

- Sung — Deborah tells her own soul that all the strength was God's. The whole battle previews the gathering of the nations at Armageddon.

Judges 5:22 · Darby

Then did the horse-hoofs clatter with the coursings, The coursings of their steeds.

Deborah's song moves from the clash of kings at Megiddo to one sound: hooves hammering the ground as Sisera's horses run. The song turns Canaan's war horses into proof of collapse, and asks what human strength is worth when God enters a battle.

The battlefield as a pattern of the last battle

Commentators read verses 19 to 22 as a preview of a far larger battle still ahead.

Judges 5:19 to 22 describes the great battle. It is a great battle mainly because of what it pictures. It was fought at Megiddo, and it stands for the time of slaughter waiting for the nations. They will be gathered together at Armageddon, just before the Lord Jesus sets up His kingdom on earth. On that great day there will be not only the kings of Canaan, but "the kings from the rising of the sun," and "the kings of the whole habitable world" (Rev. 16:12, 14).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Hoofbeats as the sound of panic

A second writer turns from the kings to the fight itself.

Next we have the actual conflict and overthrow of the enemy. Heaven and earth unite against the oppressors of the people of God. The stars from their courses fought against them above; the Kishon swept them away with its stream below. The mighty ones showed how mighty they were by the stamping of their frightened horses. Such is the strength of those who are with God: the mightier the enemies, the mightier their overthrow.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why horses carry this weight in Scripture

Horses meant war, and God had already told His people where not to place their trust. The lines below come from an older translation.

In the days our book speaks of, and in the East, the horse was used mainly for war. God warned His people not to put their trust in this powerful weapon: "The horse is a vain thing for safety." "Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we will remember the name of the Lord our God" (Ps. 20:7). It is He who "has triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider He has thrown into the sea" (Ex. 15:1). The Lord is exalted far above all His creatures. Deliverance must come, not from horses, but from the Lord on high.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Strength trodden underfoot

The next writer ties the hooves to the torrent of Kishon in the line before, quoting both verses from an older translation.

God does not watch the conflicts of His people from a distance. At the right moment He steps in with His heavenly resources to win the victory for His own. Here He used the forces of nature to complete the rout of King Jabin's powerful army. Deborah, as the instrument of God, can say, "My soul, you have trodden down strength!" as she recalls how "the horse-hoofs clatter with the coursings, the coursing of their steeds." All the mighty power of the enemy is trodden under the feet of God's servant who trusts in Him. We should have no fear of our enemies. God has given us His armour so that we can stand against every attack, and "The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet" (Rom. 16:20).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Who gets the credit

Notice who the singers refuse to talk about.

Then in verses 19-22, we have another characteristic of faithfulness. They do not boast in themselves or even think of themselves. They give the victory to God alone, and proclaim its heavenly character.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer looks at how the whole campaign ended:

To crown the defeat, the great Sisera, the hero of so many victories, fell before a woman and a tent peg! The very weakness and smallness of the means used made it clear that all the honour and glory was God's.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Boast. The horse stood for military strength. God warned His people not to trust it.

- Panic. The mighty ones showed how mighty they were by the stamping of their frightened horses. The hooves are the sound of flight, not of attack.

- Overthrow. Heaven and earth close in. The stars fight from above, the Kishon sweeps from below, and the mightier the foe, the greater the fall.

- Glory. Verses 19-22 give the victory to God alone. The means He used were so weak that no one else could claim the honour.

- Ahead. The battle at Megiddo pictures the nations gathered at Armageddon. God promises believers the same trodden-down strength now: "The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet."

Judges 5:23 · Darby

Curse Meroz, saith the Angel of Jehovah; Curse, curse the inhabitants thereof; For they came not to the help of Jehovah, To the help of Jehovah among the mighty.

Deborah's song curses one small town. Meroz never fought against Israel. It stayed home while the battle raged. The angel of the LORD speaks the curse, and it raises a hard question: why is doing nothing treated as taking a side?

A town known only by its curse

Meroz sat close enough to strike at Sisera, the enemy commander Israel had just beaten. What it did with that position is the only thing Scripture tells us about it.

Meroz appears to have been a town in an especially good position to help destroy Sisera's army. But Meroz seems to have deliberately refused to come "to the help of the LORD, to the help of the LORD against the mighty." So it brought on itself the curse of the angel of the LORD. In refusing to help Deborah and Barak, Meroz had refused to help the LORD. This is the only mention of Meroz in Scripture. It was clearly a large town with a wonderful opportunity to serve the LORD. The opportunity was lost. The curse settled that it would be forgotten for ever, except in connection with its curse.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Cursed for doing nothing

Other tribes also stayed away, yet no curse falls on them. Commentators trace the difference to where Meroz stood.

Meroz had done nothing, and yet they were bitterly cursed. They are cursed because they had done nothing — nothing! — while their brothers were locked in a death-struggle on the high places of the field to save the testimony of God from destruction. Meroz stood at the centre of a war fought for God's work, and its own survival was at stake. There was some excuse for the inaction of Gilead and the others — though they are rebuked — because they were not locally involved. But there was none at all for Meroz. It was in the thick of the responsibility. Yet with mean and selfish cowardice it left the labour and the danger to others, while it was happy to enjoy the results.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same writer contrasts how onlookers judge such neutrality with how Deborah judged it:

In a great crisis, some people stay neutral. Shallow-minded people admire them for their good sense and fairness. But Deborah knew them through and through. She saw that their good sense is cowardice and their fairness is heartless indifference. So she curses them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Comfort as the cause

One writer gives two reasons for the curse, and finds the second in the town's name.

Why is Meroz singled out like this? I have no doubt it was for two reasons. First, because their location placed them where their help would have been effective. But then, as always, the failure suggests something else as its cause. Meroz means "built of cedars," or, as we might say, dwellers in cedar palaces. You could say it represents the luxury of spiritual self-pleasing, in contrast to the lowliness of serving the Lord.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Help given to the Lord Himself

The charge is not that Meroz failed to help Barak. It is that Meroz failed to help the LORD.

Notice the remarkable words used about the people of Meroz. They "did not come to the help of the LORD, to the help of the LORD against the mighty." Think of it: we are not called to help one another, but to help the Lord. Of course He does not need our help for Himself. He can, and one day will, overthrow all His enemies and ours with the sword that comes out of His mouth. But our Lord identifies Himself with His poor brothers who suffer or sit in prison. He treats help given to them as help done to Himself. So it is here.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same curse in the New Testament

One writer carries the curse beyond Israel's battle. It falls on anyone who bears the name of Christ but has no heart for Him.

In these troubled times some people do not take sides with Christ. They link themselves with His name and with God's people, yet their hearts are indifferent to Him. Let them be cursed. "If anyone has no love for the Lord, let him be accursed" (1 Corinthians 16:22).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The other side: anyone can be a help

The warning has a positive twin. Small service counts, because the Lord hands out work by size of heart, not size of gift.

It is a great thing to be free, fresh and simple in heart. Then you are ready in the Lord's hand to do just what He gives you to do. Everyone has his own little place for God... The Lord gives each of us an opportunity in our little corner to serve Him and His people sweetly and simply. This is open to everyone.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Position — Meroz sat where its help would have counted most. Distant tribes were only rebuked; Meroz was cursed.

- Comfort — its name means "built of cedars." Ease and self-pleasing kept its people at home.

- Neutrality — standing aside looks like good sense to onlookers. Deborah calls it cowardice and cold indifference.

- Identification — the charge is refusing to help the LORD. He counts help given to His afflicted people as given to Himself.

- Opportunity — Meroz lost its one chance and is remembered only for the curse. Everyone else still has a little corner in which to serve.

Judges 5:24 · Darby

Blessed above women shall Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite be, Blessed above women in the tent!

Deborah's song has just cursed the town of Meroz for staying home. Now it turns and crowns a woman who was not even an Israelite — so why does the song's highest praise go to an outsider?

A Blessing Set Against a Curse

The song sets Jael directly opposite the town that failed. One writer marks the reversal: the town with a plain duty did nothing, while the woman with every excuse acted:

In contrast with the curse upon Meroz, we have next the blessing upon Jael, where the iron warrior lies in utter collapse at the feet of a woman. Meroz had failed in the plain path of duty. But Jael, who might have been excused, forgets her womanhood and her foreign birth. She forgets the ordinary claims of hospitality and the pity given to someone in distress, and strikes for the Lord and for His people.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The verse blesses her among women who live in tents. One writer sets that tent against the cedar palaces of Meroz:

Put side by side the mighty cedar temple palaces of Meroz, and the lowly tent of Jael. A cedar palace and a curtain! Oh, how many of God's people have brought a curse upon themselves for having a cedar palace which stole their heart away from Christ. On the other hand, the tent of a pilgrim and its pin — those are things that can serve in victory... it is a blessed truth that those who are Jaels, who take their place on God's side and His work — their name will not be missing from that song of triumph on the day of the Lord's celebration, in glory.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Outsider Given Honour

Jael was not an Israelite, yet the song gives her the highest praise. One writer notes she is not the first stranger God has honoured:

Next, in Jael, the wife of Heber the Kenite, we see the stranger again made illustrious. It was by her hand, in a very special way, that God subdued the king of Canaan before the children of Israel.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

An Undivided Heart

The verse names her as the wife of Heber. Heber had made his own peace with Israel's enemy, which makes her choice sharper:

Heber's act does not seem to have been one of faith. He kept apart from the people in their low estate, to free himself from the responsibility of Israel's sad condition. What is more, he was at peace with the open enemy of his people, and he had arranged things so that Jabin would not trouble him. But a weak woman lived under Heber's tent. She refused safety at such a price, and would not own any alliance with the enemy of her nation. Israel had undivided possession of her heart.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Faith, Not Instinct

So what is the song blessing? Not her love for a country — one writer names the reason:

Like Meroz, she had a golden opportunity that would never come her way again. She seized it with both hands — literally: one hand holding the tent peg, the other swinging the hammer. It was not a natural action for a woman, but it was an act of faith. Faith controlled the feelings of nature and showed her what to do to help deliver God's people. It was not merely an act of patriotism: it was an act of faith... The claims of God must come before the feelings of nature or the claims of men.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Moral Difficulty

Readers stumble at a blessing on a killing that broke the claims of hospitality. One writer answers from the story around it:

People have shown great indignation at this act of Jael, and even Christians have blamed her severely. But it was foretold that the LORD would "sell Sisera into the hand of a woman," and right after the deed we read, "So on that day God subdued Jabin the king of Canaan before the people of Israel." ... The song makes clear that Sisera was an enemy not only of God's people, but of the Lord Himself. So God empowered Jael to take his life... Where an act carries out God's righteous judgement, it rises far above what would be right under the ordinary rules of hospitality or war. Of course in some cases the thing done may be according to the will of God, but not the way in which it is done.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Curse answered. The song sets the blessing on Jael against the curse on Meroz. Meroz had a plain duty and refused it; Jael had every excuse and acted.

- Tent over palace. Meroz had cedar palaces; Jael had a curtain and a tent peg. A cedar palace can steal the heart from Christ; a pilgrim's tent and its peg serve in victory.

- Stranger honoured. Jael was a stranger to Israel, yet God subdued Canaan's king by her hand.

- Undivided heart. Her husband bought safety by keeping peace with Israel's enemy; she refused safety at that price.

- Faith, not feeling. Her act came from faith, not patriotism or natural feeling — and the song of triumph keeps her name.

Judges 5:25 · Darby

He asked water, she gave milk; In the nobles' bowl she brought forth cream.

Deborah's song pauses at a tent door, where a beaten general asked for water and Jael handed him milk in a nobleman's bowl. Commentators read that small detail as the measure of Jael's heart, and as a pattern for treating a thirsty enemy.

What She Gave Him

Older translations say Jael brought "butter in a lordly dish." The ESV calls it curds in a noble's bowl. It was not the butter we spread on bread today.

This was curdled milk. Genesis 18:8; Deuteronomy 32:14. Jael brought Sisera "butter" to drink, Judges 5:25... Curdled milk is a common drink in the East, and mixed with honey it tastes very good.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

More Than He Asked For

He asked for water. She brought out the best thing she had, and served it in a way that honoured his rank.

When the enemy of the people of God comes to her, this woman shows grace. She brings out the best thing she has in her tent to honour Sisera's rank. She hands him the drink in a bowl fit for a nobleman. Is this not the very opposite of contempt? Should we not act this way towards the enemies of God, giving them more than they ask for their thirst and their food? God's witnesses go on with grace beyond the worst enemies of Christ.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Milk, Then The Tent Peg

Two lines later, the hands that carried the bowl take up a hammer. One writer follows a single thread through both scenes.

When Sisera asked for water, she gave him milk, a picture of giving the simple, elementary truth of God even to an enemy (v. 25). But Sisera pictures one who does not respond to the truth, and grace refused results in judgment. The tent peg also stands for the truth of God, which supports the believer's pilgrim character, because it keeps the tent in place... She illustrates the faith that is willing to use the truth, whether in grace or in judging for God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Kindness That Was Not Compromise

Her husband Heber chose safety. Jael refused it.

He was at peace with the open enemy of his people... But a weak woman lived in Heber's tent. She refused safety at that price, and she would not accept an alliance with the enemy of her nation. Israel had undivided possession of her heart... Jael hides him. He asks for a drink of water, and she gives him something better, milk. She does not treat him at first as an enemy, but with pity. Yet when the enemy of her people stands in front of her, she becomes pitiless. The only weapons she had were the tools of a woman who keeps the tent.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Pattern For Facing An Opponent

One writer turns Jael's order — listen first, act after — into a rule for meeting people who argue against God.

A man comes to you with all his arguments. You do not agree with them, but you listen to him. That is how you catch him in his own cleverness. I will gladly welcome a man who denies God, if I can put an end to his unbelief. If I can get the nail of pilgrim truth through his head, then I am willing, dear friends, to sit and hear him argue his unbelief.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Commentators Differ On The Deed

Not every writer reads the song's praise as approval of all Jael did. One warns against a further step, while still crediting her faith.

We must be careful not to treat these deeds as carrying God's approval, above all the detail of what Jael did. It was an act of courage and of faith. Faith moved her, and that faith led her to kill Sisera, the enemy of Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Small Hand God Used

Jael had no sword. One writer names what she did have, and what God did through it.

Sisera, thirsty and worn out, looked for shelter in Jael's tent. She killed him by driving a tent peg through his head with a hammer. This shows how God can strengthen a feeble instrument to work out His deliverance.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Asked — He asked for water. Curdled milk was an ordinary Eastern drink, and it is what she poured out for him.

- Given — She gave more than the request and served it in her finest bowl. That is the opposite of contempt, and the pattern for how God's witnesses treat His worst enemies.

- Refused — The milk pictures the simple truth of God offered even to an enemy. Sisera pictures the man who will not respond. Grace refused ends in judgment.

- Undivided — Her kindness was not compromise. Her heart already belonged to God's people. So she could show pity first and strike after.

- Feeble — A tent, a bowl, a peg and a hammer were all she had. God delivers through instruments that look useless. Commentators differ over how much of the deed itself God approved.

Judges 5:26 · Darby

She put her hand to the tent-pin, And her right hand to the workmen's hammer; And she smote Sisera, she struck through his head, Shattered and pierced through his temples.

Deborah's song slows down and lingers on one moment. A woman's two hands, one on a tent peg, the other on a workman's hammer. Israel's oppressor lies dead on the floor of her tent. Two questions follow. Why did God choose so small a weapon? And why does a song celebrate a killing?

A weapon taken from the tent

The tools named here are not military. They belong to the woman who pitches and strikes a tent, and the tent is where she wins.

The instrument she used for Israel's deliverance was even more worthless than Shamgar's. The only weapons she had were the tools of a woman who keeps the tent. With them she deals the fatal blow to the head of the enemy. Jael, like Deborah and every woman of faith, does not go at all beyond her sphere. She carries out her work of vengeance inside her dwelling, with the weapons the tent supplied her, and gains the victory there. She handles the weapons of her narrow sphere with as much skill as a man could have shown, for if her hand had trembled in the least, everything would have been lost.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The smallness of the means is the point

A celebrated commander died under a wooden spike. Commentators read that contrast as deliberate.

To crown the defeat, the great Sisera, the hero of so many victories, fell before a woman and a tent peg! Barak had been told beforehand that this enterprise would not be for his honour. He took it up reluctantly and timidly, and so it turned out. The very weakness and insignificance of the means employed made it clear that all the honour and glory was God's.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Samuel Ridout explains why Barak's share of the victory was cut short:

Therefore the full victory will not be his, but Sisera will fall by the hands of Jael, a feeble woman. How our blessed God would check, with a holy jealousy, all usurpation of His place even by the instrument He may please to use.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Was Jael right to do it?

Many readers find the killing shocking. Leslie Grant weighs two things: her motive, and the fact that this was wartime.

If her action had come from selfish motives, this would have been murder. But Sisera was an oppressor of the people of God, and it was a time of war. So the Lord approved of her killing this enemy of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A second objection goes wider. Should the Spirit of God write a song that rejoices over an enemy's ruin? William Kelly answers:

The root of the difficulty seems to be this: people are apt to judge from their own circumstances. Suppose we think God's Spirit is bound to say nothing but what suits a Christian. Then I grant you, we could not have the song of Deborah. But then we could not have had the Old Testament as it is. The Spirit of God did work, but He worked according to the state of the people of God at that time.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

An undivided heart behind the blow

Jael did not strike out of temper. She struck because of where her heart was fixed.

The heart of Jael was wholly with the God of Israel, with the Israel of God. When it became a question of truth, and of treating the enemy as an enemy, she showed the greatest energy. This woman is, at this moment, in the narrow sphere of the house, the real leader of the armies of the Lord. She is in the front rank, honoured by God to gain the victory, for she has an undivided heart for His people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A head crushed by the woman's hand

J T Mawson hears an older promise in this wound. He starts from the dead commander's name.

Sisera was the great leader, and his name means "he that binds with chains", and we are well aware that the great captive-maker is Satan himself. In the end he was destroyed by something very weak in itself. His head was bruised, even to death, by a woman and a tent peg. And Jesus, the woman's Seed, has bruised the serpent's head. Men despised Him, because He was meek and lowly; His death was weakness and folly in their eyes.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The peg and hammer in your own hand

Ridout makes the tent peg itself the secret of Jael's power, and then turns it on the reader.

The only weapon she has is feeble enough, but it says: here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come. It was the tent peg that killed the mighty man. The one who has a tent peg is the one who is separate from the world, a true stranger and pilgrim. Take that pilgrim life of yours and lay hold of it with your hands — the practical life. Take up the hammer of God's word — it is a hammer in your right hand. Take hold of peg and hammer, and put to death the principles that are eating the very life out of your soul.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Small hand. Jael fights with a tent-keeper's tools and wins inside her own tent, without leaving her sphere.

- Small weapon. A wooden peg fells a commander of iron chariots, so that the honour can belong to nobody but God.

- Guarded glory. Barak heard in advance that the campaign would not bring him honour. God keeps the crown from the instrument He uses.

- Whole heart. She struck when truth was at stake, because her heart was undivided for God's people.

- Crushed head. The pierced skull points ahead. The woman's Seed has bruised the serpent's head, and men saw only weakness in His death.

Judges 5:27 · Darby

Between her feet he bowed, he fell, he lay down Between her feet he bowed, he fell; Where he bowed, there he fell, overcome.

Deborah's song slows down here and tells one moment three times over: the enemy commander goes down at the feet of a woman in a tent. Commentators read the scene as God's own account of how He overturns great power. They differ, though, over the way Jael did it.

Power through weakness

God had said beforehand that He would hand Sisera over to a woman. He did not use Heber, Jael's husband, but Jael herself.

It is not Heber, however, but his wife Jael who is used by God. She has faith that identifies her with the people of God, and makes their enemies her own... Let us just notice the lesson repeated all through the book. The way of power is through weakness. God will only use the instrument that is weak enough to give itself up into His hands.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Grace before judgment

Before the peg came the milk. One writer asks what that kindness should teach us.

Now Jael is honoured; the one with a little strength is blessed. "He asked for water and she gave him milk; she brought him curds in a noble's bowl." When the enemy of the people of God comes to her, this woman shows grace. She brings out the best thing she has in her tent, in recognition of Sisera's rank. Is this not the very opposite of contempt? Is this not how we should act towards the enemies of God? We should give them more than they ask for their thirst and their nourishment.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer reads the same scene as a picture of grace offered and refused.

When Sisera asked for water, she gave him milk, a picture of giving the simple, elementary truth of God even to an enemy (v. 25). But Sisera pictures one who does not respond to the truth, and grace refused results in judgment... She illustrates the faith that is willing to use the truth, whether in grace or in judging for God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A tent peg and a hammer

A tent peg killed Sisera, not a sword — the gear of a temporary home. One writer turns that into a challenge to the reader.

Jael takes the witness of her pilgrim life — she is a pilgrim and a stranger — and kills him. The only weapon she has is feeble enough, but it says, "here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come." It was the tent peg that killed the mighty... Take that pilgrim standing of yours. Take hold of it with your hands — the practical life. Take hold of the hammer of God's word; it is a hammer in your right hand. Now apply it to that argument of yours that would tamper with God's truth.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A disputed method

She showed him hospitality and then killed him. Writers differ on whether the song's praise covers the way she did it. One answers that she was carrying out God's judgment, which puts her act in a different class.

People have shown great indignation at this act of Jael, and even Christians have condemned her. But it was foretold that the LORD would "sell Sisera into the hand of a woman"... And Deborah, in her song of praise, declared Jael to be "most blessed of women." This song shows that Sisera was an enemy not only of God's people but of the Lord Himself. She prophetically says, "So may all your enemies perish, O LORD!"... So God empowered Jael to take his life. Sometimes an act is clearly the carrying out of God's righteous judgment. Such an act rises far above what would be right under the ordinary rules of hospitality or of war.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Another draws a line between the service and the way it was done.

Jael did a great service to Israel, no doubt... But praise for her action does not have to mean approval of the way she carried it out. It was wholly treacherous... If she had taken a more straightforward course, trusting God, she would have succeeded just as well.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A larger defeat pictured

The song repeats the collapse until it ends in one word: dead. One writer sees in this one man's ruin a far greater one.

Sisera was the great leader, and his name means "he who binds with chains," and we are well aware that the great captive-maker is Satan himself. In the end something very weak destroyed him. A woman and a tent peg bruised his head, even to death. And Jesus, the woman's Seed, has bruised the serpent's head.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Weakness chosen. God passes over the strong. He uses the instrument weak enough to leave itself in His hands.

- Weakness supplied. The weapon is a tent peg and a hammer: the tools of someone who lives as a stranger, not a soldier's sword.

- Weakness offering grace. Milk in a noble's bowl came before the peg — more than the enemy asked, given while he was still an enemy.

- Weakness judging. Grace refused ends in judgment; the same faith that pours the milk drives the peg.

- Weakness winning. The captive-maker falls at a woman's feet — an early picture of the woman's Seed bruising the serpent's head.

Judges 5:28 · Darby

Them other of Sisera looketh out at the window, And crieth through the lattice, Why is his chariot so long in coming? Why tarry the trampings of his chariots?

Deborah's song ends far from the battlefield, inside an enemy palace. Sisera led the army Israel had just destroyed, and his mother stands at her window, watching the road for him. We already know what she does not. Her son is dead, and the delay that puzzles her means judgment has already fallen.

The Window and the Lattice

She is looking through a lattice. One reference work explains what that was:

The window of the East was made of trellis work. It let in air and light, yet screened the room from view. Judges 5:28; 2 Kings 1:2; Song of Songs 2:9.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Question Behind the Delay

She is not afraid he has lost. She is impatient for a victory she takes for granted.

The mother of Sisera looked through the window and wondered anxiously why he took so long to come home (v.28). Sisera and his armies were used to winning their battles with no difficulty. Her wise friends, and she herself, thought the answer was that Sisera and his men were taking time to gather and divide the spoil taken from Israel — girls and garments, and so on. What a shock it would be to these women to find that both Sisera and his armies were not only defeated, but destroyed!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Wise Ladies With Wise Reasons

The women around her supply explanations, and every one of them is wrong. One writer sees here how human cleverness explains away the delay of God's judgment:

She has her wise ladies around her, this mother of Sisera, the leader of intellectual denial of God's truth. They can give wise reasons why the chariot-wheels of the supposed conqueror are late. In a day that is coming fast, the wise of the earth will be ready in the same way, with plenty of reasons why the victorious march of man's mind is late. But for man, in the pride of his rebellion, there is no triumph, no spoils, no embroidered garment to dress the flesh. When they say "peace and safety," sudden destruction will fall on them, and they will not escape.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Solemn Irony

There is no pity in the way Deborah paints this scene. The same writer names the tone of it:

Last of all comes a piece of solemn irony in the description of Sisera's mother. It reminds us of that awful word, "He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision." The derision of the Lord! What an awful thought!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer sums up what the scene does to her pride:

(Verses 28, 30) Another scene takes place in the palace of Sisera's mother, whose pride is humbled to the very dust.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Two Women Seen by a Third

Deborah sings about two women. One writer notices which two she picks out:

Note in passing that, despite the high position God gave her, Deborah keeps her character as a mother in Israel. She shows remarkable understanding of what belongs to her own sphere as a woman. She celebrates what honours Jael, the woman of faith, and she announces what brings down judgment on the haughty woman.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The Same Words, Turned Around

One writer turns the same question toward the return of Christ. He starts with what a real hope does to a life:

A man's life is always shaped by his real hopes. If a man is heir to an estate, his life is shaped by the hope of inheriting it. If we knew more of the power of the Spirit as "the guarantee of our inheritance," we would stop arguing about the time or manner of our Master's arrival. As "prisoners of hope," we would be looking out eagerly from our prison windows, saying, "Why is His chariot so long in coming? Why tarry the wheels of His chariot?"

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Where the Song Ends

The window scene is not the last word. One writer reads the song's ending as a picture of how things finish for both sides:

So all the enemies of the Lord will perish, while for those who love Him there is glory and rest in store.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Watching. She stands behind a lattice, seeing out while hidden from view, asking why her son's chariot is late.

- Assuming. Past victories trained her to expect another. She hears the delay as spoil being counted, not as defeat.

- Explaining. Her wise companions give confident reasons for the delay, just as human wisdom explains away the delay of judgment.

- Reversing. The irony is deliberate. A palace's pride sinks to the dust, and Scripture calls this the laughter of the One who sits in the heavens.

- Waiting rightly. Ask the same question about Christ's return, and it becomes the cry of hope. The song closes with ruin for God's enemies and glory for those who love Him.

Judges 5:29 · Darby

The wise amongst her ladies answer [her], Yea, she returneth answer to herself,

Deborah's song ends far from the battlefield. It moves to a palace, where Sisera's mother waits at a window and her noblewomen explain why her son is late. The verse turns on one quiet detail. She gives herself the answer she wants to hear, and it is wrong.

A Mother at the Window

The song shifts to the enemy's side. Deborah thinks of the women of Canaan waiting at home.

Deborah also thinks of how the women of Canaan would be affected at this time. The mother of Sisera looked through the window and wondered anxiously why he took so long to come home (v.28). Sisera and his armies usually won their battles with no difficulty. Her wise friends, and she herself, thought they knew the answer. Sisera and his men were taking time to gather and divide the spoil taken from Israel — girls and garments, and so on. What a shock it would be to these women to find that both Sisera and his armies were not only defeated, but destroyed!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

She Answers Herself

The verse says her wisest ladies answer her, and then adds that she answers herself. One writer notes that she does not take her ladies' explanation. She repeats it to herself. He then looks at the prize she expected.

Her "wise ladies" offer to explain the cause of the delay. She does not listen to them. She repeats to herself, "Have they not found and divided the spoil? ... two pieces of dyed work embroidered for the neck as spoil?" Here we have a hint about the use in Old Testament times of these coloured garments. They were worn as marks of distinction, "for the neck as spoil," Sisera's mother says. He should wear this coloured prize as a mark of honour fitting such a mighty conqueror as he, she thought.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The Irony of Heaven

Deborah does not just report this scene. She sings it. One writer hears a sharper note in her song.

Last we have a piece of solemn irony in the description of the mother of Sisera. It reminds us of that awful word, "He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision." The derision of the Lord! What an awful thought!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer sums up the change in one line:

Another scene is taking place in the palace of Sisera's mother, whose pride is humbled to the very dust.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Wise Reasons for the Delay

The verse calls these women wise. Ridout takes that word and reads it into our own day.

This mother of Sisera has her wise ladies about her. She is the leader of intellectual denial of God's truth. And they can give wise reasons why the chariot-wheels of the supposed conqueror are so slow. So too, in a day that is coming fast, the wise of the earth will be ready. They will have plenty of reasons for the delay of the victorious march of man's mind. For man, in the pride of his rebellion, there is no triumph, no spoils, no embroidered garment to adorn the flesh. "While people are saying, 'There is peace and security,' then sudden destruction will come upon them... and they will not escape."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Spoil Expected, Defeat Received

The palace has it backwards. The victory and the spoil went to the other side.

The enemy of God's people, and all connected with him, are utterly confounded. Instead of the expected victory with lavish spoils, there is defeat and destruction. The palm of triumph and the rejoicing belong to God's people. The mourning belongs to those who thought to keep them in chains and to plunder them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Deborah's song ends by looking ahead. One writer marks the limit of what Deborah could see:

The mother of Sisera waits for the return of her victorious son. She expects nothing but good, and her wise ladies are with her. It is a remarkable irony. So all the enemies of the Lord will perish, while for those who love Him there is glory and rest in store. Deborah could only express a longing: that the enemies might perish, and that those who love Him might be like the sun in its might and splendour. It was her prayer. Through the full light of prophecy we know more. We know how the enemies of God will perish, and that the glory will belong to those who love Him.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — A mother waits at a window and asks why her son is late. His armies always won with ease, so his delay worries her.

- Answer — Her wisest ladies reply, but she answers herself. She repeats the comforting explanation instead of taking it from them.

- Spoil — She pictures the plunder shared out: captured girls, and embroidered garments that mark out a great conqueror.

- Irony — The song does not weep with her. It sets her confident reasoning against the God who holds His enemies in derision. Her pride falls to the dust.

- Reversal — The expected victory and its lavish spoils turn into defeat and destruction. The triumph belongs to God's people. The mourning belongs to those who planned to plunder them.

Judges 5:30 · Darby

Have they not found, divided the booty, A damsel, two damsels, to each? A booty of dyed stuffs for Sisera, A booty of dyed stuffs of embroidery, Dyed stuff of double embroidery for the neck of a spoiler?

The song of Deborah ends inside an enemy palace. Sisera's mother waits at the window and calms her fear with a picture of her son dividing the loot — captured women and embroidered cloth. The reader already knows he is dead.

The scene behind the words

These are not Deborah's own words. They belong to a woman waiting at home, and her companions give her the answer she wants to hear.

The mother of Sisera looked through the window in anxious wonder at why he took so long to come home. Sisera and his armies were used to winning their battles with no difficulty. Her wise friends, and she herself, thought the answer was this: Sisera and his men were taking time to gather and divide the spoil taken from Israel — girls, garments and the rest. What a shock it would be to these women to find that both Sisera and his armies were not only defeated, but destroyed!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The vocabulary of plunder

Two phrases need unpacking. "Have they not sped?" simply means have they not succeeded — the older word comes from a root meaning to hasten or prosper, as one reference work notes on this verse. The dyed and embroidered cloth is explained by the last clause of the verse itself.

Here we have a hint as to the use in Old Testament times of these garments of many colours. They were worn as marks of distinction, "fit for the necks of those who take the spoil," Sisera's mother says. He should wear this "prey of many colours" as a distinctive honour becoming such a mighty conqueror as he, she thought.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

What "a damsel or two" reveals

The casual arithmetic over captured girls is not incidental detail; it tells you what kind of army this was, and what Israel had been living under.

The sins of Israel had brought them once more into the bondage of the Canaanites. The Canaanites treated them with unusual harshness. Their earlier conquerors, the Philistines, had ruled them more mildly and wisely. The highways, Deborah says, were deserted. The people cowered and crept along the side roads to hide from the brutal Sisera and his troops.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Irony, and the laughter of heaven

The song never corrects Sisera's mother. It lets her keep talking, and the reader hears how hollow her hope is.

Last we have a piece of solemn irony in the description of the mother of Sisera. It reminds us of that awful word, "He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision." The derision of the Lord! What an awful thought!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Confident explanations for a delay that means defeat

The women around Sisera's mother have an explanation ready for the missing chariots. Ridout hears an echo of it in our own day.

This mother of Sisera has her wise ladies about her. She leads the intellectual denial of God's truth, and they can give wise reasons why the chariot wheels of the supposed conqueror are so slow. In a day that is coming fast, the wise of earth will be ready in the same way. They will have plenty of reasons why the victorious march of man's mind is delayed. Ah, for man, in the pride of his rebellion, there is no triumph, no spoils, no embroidered garment to adorn the flesh. When they say "peace and safety," sudden destruction will fall, and they will not escape.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A pattern that reaches forward

Gaebelein looks past the palace window to the end of the story.

Verses 24-31 are a vivid description of what took place. We see the mother of Sisera waiting for the return of her victorious son. She expects nothing but good and her wise ladies are with her. It is a remarkable irony. So all the enemies of the Lord will perish, while for those who love Him there is glory and rest in store.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A point where commentators differ

Commentators differ here. Some read the whole song as prophecy. Another writer warns that recording a song is not the same as approving every line of it.

The Holy Spirit records that Deborah and Barak sang these things, but in no way puts His sanction on all that they say. Take the very natural, but rather savage, way they praise every detail of Jael's heroic treachery. They also rejoice over the horror they expect from Sisera's mother. She watches for him to come home while he lies dead in Jael's tent, with a tent peg nailing his head to the floor.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Expectation. A mother at a window expects loot; her wise companions confirm it. The delay she is explaining away is the silence of a destroyed army.

- Exposure. The women counted out and the embroidered cloth show the character of Sisera's rule — the same brutality that had emptied Israel's highways.

- Emptiness. The many-coloured garments were marks of honour for a conqueror. For proud rebellion there is no triumph, no spoils, no garment to adorn it.

- Echo. The confident reasons of the "wise ladies" are still the world's reasons. When people say peace and safety, sudden destruction falls and no one escapes.

- End. So all the enemies of the Lord perish — and for those who love Him, glory and rest are in store.

Judges 5:31 · Darby

So let all thine enemies perish, Jehovah! But let them that love him be as the rising of the sun in its might. And the land had rest forty years.

Deborah's song ends with a prayer, not a battle report. It sets two futures side by side: the Lord's enemies perish, and those who love Him rise like the sun.

The Highest Point in the Book

Commentators call this song the high point of the book of Judges. This verse is where it lands.

In the victory and song of Deborah and Barak we reach the highest point in the book of Judges. It reaches on, as a picture, to the full victory for Israel and for the earth which will bring in the glories of the millennium.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Deborah's words are a longing, not a report of something finished.

Thus all the enemies of the Lord will perish, while for those who love Him there is glory and rest in store. Deborah could only express a longing that the enemies might perish, and that those who love Him might be as the sun in might and splendour. It was her prayer. We know more, through the full light of prophecy, how the enemies of God will perish and the glory will be for those who love Him.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Whose Enemies?

She does not pray against her own opponents. She has handed the quarrel over to God.

The enemy of God's people, and everyone connected with him, are completely confounded. Instead of the expected victory with lavish spoils, there is defeat and destruction. But Deborah credits it all to the Lord. To her, the enemy of Israel was the enemy of the Lord, so she can say, "So let all Your enemies perish, Lord!"

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Words for a Later Deliverance

One writer puts this line on the lips of a future generation. When judgment falls on Satan's two chief agents, Deborah's words are the ones that fit.

There is no struggle with almighty power. Christ "takes" these two wicked instruments of Satan and at once executes judgment, casting them alive into hell… The godly remnant of that day will hear of the mighty deliverance their expected Messiah has worked for them. Then they may well cry out in the language of Deborah and Barak: "So let all Your enemies perish, O Lord: but let those who love Him be as the sun when he goes forth in his might."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Sun Image

Older translations read "those who love Him" where the ESV has "your friends"; the writers quoted here follow the older wording. The brightness promised to them belongs first to Christ Himself.

Here we have one more recovered blessing that marks the awakening: Deborah declares her hope. She looks on to that glorious day. The Lord will have executed judgment, and then He will make the saints in Israel shine out like the sun itself. They will be like Him whose face was, in the eyes of the prophet, "like the sun shining in full strength." (Revelation 1:16, compare Matthew 13:43)

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

This love comes from God's work in them. The forty years of rest also point to a longer rest to come.

As for God's people, at the end the law will be written on their hearts. They will "love Him," and because of this they will "be as the rising of the sun in its might." They will take their character from Him who will "rise as the Sun of Righteousness with healing in His wings" (Malachi 4:2). After Deborah's victory, "the land had rest for forty years." But when the Lord comes and secures the mighty victory for His people, the land will have rest for the long millennial day.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Between the Song and the Sunrise

The same chapter curses Meroz for staying out of the fight (Judges 5:23). Read together with verse 31, the promised morning becomes a reason to get involved now.

Are any who profess Christianity indifferent to this conflict? Let them hear the solemn words: "Curse Meroz, said the angel of the Lord… because they did not come to the help of the Lord, to the help of the Lord against the mighty," Judges 5:23. Why did Reuben stay by the sheepfolds while the great conflict raged? Why do Christians today, loving ease and comfort, stay in the safety of the sheepfolds? God's glorious gospel goes out, and all the power and cunning of Satan opposes it… May the Lord give us grace, so that we may forget ourselves and go out to the conflict… until the morning dawns. Then all His enemies will perish, and those who love Him will be as the sun when he goes out in his might.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Prayer, not report. Deborah's closing words are a longing for a day she could not yet see. Later Scripture fills in what she could only ask for.

- God's quarrel. She treats Israel's enemy as the Lord's enemy, and leaves their ruin to Him.

- A love God gives. God writes His law on their hearts, and that produces the love the verse describes.

- Borrowed brightness. Their brightness is not their own. They take their character from the Sun of Righteousness.

- Rest that outlasts forty years. Deborah's victory bought forty years of quiet. The victory this song points to brings rest for the whole millennial day. Until that morning dawns, the call is to be in the conflict, not by the sheepfolds.