Judges 20:1–2

Judges 20:1 · Darby

And all the children of Israel went forth, and the assembly gathered together as one man, from Dan to Beer-sheba, and the land of Gilead, unto Jehovah at Mizpah.

Judges 20 opens with the whole nation on the move, gathered at Mizpah "to the LORD." Commentators ask what was missing in that unity, and why God let Israel lose twice before He gave them the victory.

A crime that concerned the whole nation

The crime at Gibeah was local, but the call to deal with it went to every tribe. One writer explains why these chapters exist, and why the discipline fell on the whole nation:

The chapters that follow (Judges 17-21) are not part of the historical order of this book. They lift the veil to show some incidents of the inner life of this people whom the patience of God bore with so long... If the state of God's people as a whole gives rise to sins that need discipline, the whole people share in the chastisement that follows. The effect is to make them take their condition to heart. That condition had stopped them from putting down evil, or from punishing it as soon as it happened. But God sets the people in His presence. He judges the whole matter, and all the people must have to do with it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Gathered to the Lord at Mizpah

They gathered "to the LORD," so the meeting place was right. One writer finds the flaw elsewhere — in the order they did things:

Very little seemed to be lacking in this united protest against evil. There was zeal to look into the evil and to purify themselves from it, and also a sense of Israel's corporate responsibility... They recognised the centre of the people's unity, for it was "to the LORD" that they gathered at Mizpah. What then was lacking in Israel? One thing, "the first love"... They had listened, discussed, decided, and then consulted God (v. 18). Instead of starting with the word of God they had left it to the last. Not that it was left out, but it no longer held the first place.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"As one man" — with one tribe missing

Three times the chapter says Israel acted as one man. Rossier weighs that show of togetherness against who was missing:

On the surface the eleven tribes looked nearly as united as when Israel purged themselves of Achan's sin and were restored at Ai. Still, it was no longer God's unity. It was no use that the people "were gathered together as one man" (v. 1), or "arose as one man" (v. 8), or were "knit together as one man" (v. 11), against Gibeah. God could not recognise the unity of Israel while Benjamin was missing.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

From Dan to Beersheba

The phrase marks the full length of the land, and the gathering was by representatives rather than by every last man:

And the summons was not in vain. Israel gather, by their representatives, from Dan to Beersheba, apart only from the tribe involved, and the Levite at Mizpeh tells the whole terrible story — naturally saying little about his own part in it.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Set beside the opening of Judges, the same national muster now points the other way:

From Dan to Beersheba into the land of Gilead they gathered at Mizpah to hear the story of the Levite. Benjamin refused to give up the wicked men. Instead of humbling themselves, admitting the dreadful guilt and bringing the guilty ones to judgment, they gathered together to fight their own brothers... What a contrast with the beginning of the book! There they were to fight against the common enemy; here against their own brothers.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Zeal that was selective

The tribes stood together against this evil. One commentator notes the evil they left alone:

All the tribes were united in insisting that judgment must be carried out against those who were guilty of criminal abuse and murder. They did not have the same zeal for God's glory in judging the idolatry of Dan. In fact, Dan was included in the stand against this moral wickedness. Dan wanted to cast out the speck in his brother's eye while ignoring the plank in his own eye! (Matt. 7:4)

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Indignation is not yet self-judgment

Anger at a scandal feels like faithfulness. The same writer asks what such a scandal should do first to those who judge it:

I am afraid the people of God too often see it that way. The feeling that rules here is simply indignation against the offenders. Yet in reality the whole matter goes much deeper. We may take it as an unchanging principle: every such shocking exposure among the people of God should bring us all to our knees in sober, real self-judgment. That must come before we take any part in judging the evil... The sin was Israel's sin, and it showed a corrupt inner state that also required judgment.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Israel's two defeats taught the same lesson. Notice what they asked God, and what they did not:

They merely ask who is to go up first. Jehovah points out Judah, but Judah is defeated. They expected an easy victory, but they lost twice. Humbled and in tears, the people turn to Jehovah again... Gibeah well deserved this discipline. But to carry it out, Israel itself needed discipline.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Gathered. The crime at Gibeah called out the whole nation, from Dan to Beersheba. Sin among God's people is never private.

- Gathered to the Lord. They met at the right centre; the flaw was that they listened, discussed and decided first, and asked God last.

- Gathered as one man. The show of unity was real to the eye, but God could not own it while one tribe was missing.

- Gathered in selective zeal. They were united against Gibeah's wickedness while Dan's idolatry marched alongside them unchallenged.

- Gathered, then broken. Two defeats came before the victory. The evil needed judging, and so did the judges.

Judges 20:2 · Darby

And the heads of all the people, of all the tribes of Israel, presented themselves in the congregation of the people of God, four hundred thousand footmen that drew sword.

A crime at Gibeah has shocked every tribe, and the nation's leaders now stand before God at Mizpah with an army behind them. It looks like Israel at its best — but was this gathering as sound as it looked?

What Drew Them Together

Israel's yearly feasts were meant to gather the nation. One writer points out what it took to bring them in.

Only one thing brings the people together and holds them together. Evil has been committed, and until that evil is judged, not a man of them will go to his home. Do you read of the Feast of Tabernacles drawing the whole nation together with joy? Year after year God quietly invited them to come up and keep the feast, and to enjoy the holy fellowship of His things. But they had preferred to live among the surrounding nations... Only this unspeakable corruption shocks them out of their sleep and makes them flow together. They are drawn not by grace, not by the attractiveness of love and goodness... An evil has been committed, and it stirs them for the time being into remarkable faithfulness to God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Whole People Involved

The verse gathers "all the tribes of Israel" for a sin committed in one town. That reach is deliberate.

If the state of God's people as a whole gives rise to sins that need discipline, the whole people share in the chastening that follows. Its effect is to make them take their condition to heart. That condition had stopped the sin from being checked, or punished at once when it happened. But God sets the people in His presence. He judges the whole matter, and all the people must have to do with it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Fair Appearance of Unity

Much about this meeting was right. The tribes gathered to the Lord, and only one of them was missing.

Very little seemed lacking in this unanimous protest against evil. They were eager to look into it and to purify themselves from it, and they felt that all Israel shared the responsibility... Above all, the gathering, the actions and the feelings of the eleven tribes made a fair show of unity. Only one tribe was absent — the smallest, and a guilty one at that. They acknowledged the centre of the people's unity, for they gathered "to Jehovah" at Mizpah. What then was lacking in Israel? One thing, "the first love."... Toward God, this love had grown cold. They had listened, discussed and decided, and only then consulted God. Instead of starting with the word of God, they left it to the last.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The missing tribe is the point. One tribe stood outside the assembly of the people of God.

To all appearance, the eleven tribes presented a nearly perfect unity. Yet it was no longer God's unity. The people "were gathered together as one man." They "arose as one man." They were "knit together as one man" against Gibeah. It was all in vain: God could not recognise the unity of Israel while Benjamin was missing.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Four Hundred Thousand Swords

The verse counts the army. The following verses show what that counting did to them.

But to be fit to be used by God to deal with evil involves much more than being willing to be His instrument. They are too ready, as we see in the result. Their anger is too quick, too unrelenting, too merciless. Theirs is the reckless haste of vengeance, and not the solemn discernment of divine judgment. They do not remember their own sins, they bring no sin-offering to God, no tears of repentance. They build on their numbers; no doubt on the justice of their cause also, but in self-righteousness and without any suspicion of themselves. So they go up to strike, and instead they are struck heavily and disastrously.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators weigh this gathering differently. One sees real zeal spoiled by a single lack. Another sees self-righteousness and haste.

Judgment That Begins at Home

For anyone facing scandal among God's people, the question is what comes first.

Here is an unchanging principle. Every such shocking exposure among the people of God should bring us all to our knees in sober, real self-judgment. That comes before we take any part in judging the evil... Israel could not rightly regard itself as clear of evil when it had to act in this solemn case. The sin was Israel's sin, and it showed a corrupt inward state that also needed judgment. The nation must come to feel it as the guilt of the whole nation, not just of the offenders.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Gathered. What God's feasts could not do, a scandal did. A nation that would not gather for joy gathered for judgment.

- Involved. A sin in one town became the business of every tribe. The state that allowed it was everyone's to take to heart.

- Hollow. The unity looked real and was even centred on the Lord. It was still not God's unity while Benjamin stood outside.

- Confident. They built on four hundred thousand swords and on a just cause. They brought no repentance and no suspicion of themselves, and the attack went disastrously against them.

- Reversed. Self-judgment comes before judging evil. Israel reversed the order and asked God only after deciding.