Judges 13–16

Judges 13:1 · Darby

And the children of Israel again did evil in the sight of Jehovah; and Jehovah gave them into the hand of the Philistines forty years.

Israel falls again here, and God leaves them under Philistine rule for forty years. Two things set this fall apart from the ones before it: how long the punishment lasted, and how quietly the people took it.

The weight of the rod

Scripture says nothing here about what Israel did. The size of the punishment is the only comment God gives.

God gives us no details of this fresh fall, but we can tell what He thought of it by the weight of the rod He laid on His people; and the Philistines were the punishment. Nothing shows the state of Israel more plainly than this fact. Until now they had been held down by enemies from outside... Here we find the enemy settled inside Israel's own borders, destroying as he goes.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Forty years, and still not over

Earlier oppressions had felt long. This one set a record, and even the deliverer God sent did not finish the job.

There had never yet been a time when Israel was so enslaved... In the days of Gideon, seven years under an enemy seemed a long time, and we were right to think so. But here we hear of a far longer period under the Philistines. They were the fiercest and most stubborn of Israel's hostile neighbours, and all the more painful because they lived inside the border. For forty years the people groaned under their hard rule. We shall also find that Samson's feats of power, great as they were, in no way broke the neck of Philistine oppression.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who the Philistines were

The Philistines lived in the land God had given Israel, but they had arrived by a route of their own.

They came from Egypt (Gen. 10:13-14). They had left Egypt behind and reached the land God had promised to His people, but they had not come by His way. They took an easy short cut that let them avoid the Red Sea and the River Jordan. Those two crossings pictured deliverance and blessing through the death and resurrection of Christ, and they had no place in the Philistines' history... They are a picture of a Christianity made worldly, religion made acceptable to people who have not been born again.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The missing cry

Israel's earlier troubles at least drove the people to call on God. This time that cry is missing.

The people had fallen back into unfaithfulness, and now enemies inside the country held them down — the Philistines, who had settled in Israel's territory. This was the last stage in the story of decline. The children of Israel no longer cried to Jehovah. They accepted the situation and did not even want rescue from it (Judges 15:11). To go on living quietly as slaves, they tried to get rid of the man who came to set them free. A complete turning away from God was close at hand.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Grace that moves first

No one asked for rescue. So the rescue that follows traces back to God alone, and He set it going before Samson was born.

With Samson we see from the very start the sovereign grace that prepares the deliverance. The angel of the Lord announces his birth, and no one on man's side seems to have asked for it. He is the son of a woman who could not have children, and the preparation for his coming starts before his birth. That last point implies that there are still conditions to meet if deliverance is to come.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The answer to an enemy inside

An enemy inside the camp calls for a different answer. One writer gives it in a single word.

Now what is the resource of the Lord's people at such a time? One word answers the question: Nazariteship. Today we should be marked by complete separation, and by a true, whole-hearted consecration to God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Nazarite lived under a vow of separation to God. The same writer notes that the vow did not always last a lifetime.

Under the law, when everything looked in order on the outside, the Nazarite vow lasted only for a time (Num. 6). In a time of ruin it became permanent, as we see in the example before us. Samson was a Nazarite from his mother's womb.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Relapse. Israel fell away again, and this fall went deeper than any before it: never had the people been so enslaved.

- Rod. God records no details of the sin. The weight of the punishment is His comment on it — forty years, longer than any bondage before.

- Inside. This enemy was no raider from beyond the border but a settler within it, and one writer calls that the last stage of decline.

- Silence. The people no longer cried to the Lord. They preferred quiet slavery to freedom, and even tried to get rid of the man who came to free them.

- Grace. God moved first. He announced a deliverer to a woman who could not have children, before anyone asked, and the resource He gave His people was a life wholly separated to Himself.

Judges 13:2 · Darby

And there was a certain man of Zoreah, of the family of the Danites, and his name was Manoah. And his wife was barren and did not bear.

Israel has lived under Philistine rule for forty years, and this time no cry for help goes up. Against that silence, the story turns to one unknown household. The man comes from a tribe with a poor record, and his wife cannot have children.

The silence before the promise

In Judges the people usually cry out to God in their trouble, and He answers. This time there is no cry.

We read of fresh departure, but of no return nor cry to Jehovah. He does act toward them in goodness, and provides a deliverer. But the deliverance itself still depends on their repentance, so it cannot happen. Samson's victories bring, at most, only some relief from their distress. And he himself fails at the last and dies, though he kills more of the Philistines at his death than in his life.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A man of Zorah, of the Danites

The verse names the tribe before the man. Dan was not a promising choice.

In the case of Samson we see how everything shows God's hand working in sovereignty. He chooses the tribe of Dan, already disgraced as the first in Israel to fall into idolatry (Judges 18). He can do as it pleases Him. No one asked Him to, yet the Lord appeared to Manoah's wife and announced the birth of this child — to her, who had been barren until then.

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

The names themselves carry meaning — the tribe, the town, and the man.

The predicted deliverer is of the family of Dan. Dan already speaks of the service of rule — a rule that must first of all be over oneself, if it is to bring blessing. Manoah is a man of Zorah, a name that reminds us of the sting of sin. His own name, "rest," already announces victory over that sting. That victory comes through submission: "Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls." Here is the Danite spirit from which the helper springs.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The barren wife and a familiar pattern

A childless woman receiving a promise is something the Bible returns to again and again, and one writer draws the common thread.

This time God chose to prepare a deliverer from the tribe of Dan, and He begins with the mother of the child to be born. The Angel of the Lord appeared to her, telling her that though she was barren, she would conceive and bear a son (v.3). The same was true of Sarah (Gen. 18:11-14), and later of Hannah (1 Sam. 1:2, 20), then also of Elizabeth, wife of Zacharias (Lk. 1:7, 13). In all such cases, does the Lord not seek to make it plain that the son born is to be in a special sense His?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why her name is left out

The verse gives the husband's name but never hers, and she carried the added weight of being childless.

The angel of the Lord appeared to the wife of Manoah, a Danite. She was not the one that men would have chosen. Even her name is not given. She was a barren woman — a reproach among the people of Israel, despised in the eyes of the other women. But this nameless, despised woman, from the lowest of Israel's tribes, was the vessel God chose. Through her He could work out His own will. So we see the great truth emphasized, that His ways are not the ways of men. "I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing." That is the boast of a Christianity gone worldly. It walks by the flickering gleam of its own dim light. But "God chose what is foolish in the world... God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, so that no human being might boast in the presence of God," 1 Cor. 1:27-29.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

One faithful household in a ruined nation

When a whole nation stops listening, God still keeps a few who do listen.

In the middle of this hopeless situation, God set apart a godly remnant, and sent His messages to them. Manoah and his wife feared Jehovah, listened to His voice and spoke to one another (compare Mal. 3:16). They are a striking picture of the remnant — the Marys, Elizabeths, Annas, Zacharias and Simeons — who waited for the true Messiah, the Saviour of Israel.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Strength held by separation

The deliverer born to this home would be a Nazarite — someone set apart to God.

From Philistine bondage the deliverer is a Nazarite... For the Nazarite pictures the separation from the world that belongs to the true church. It is separation from the world's intoxicating joys, from its legal claims, and from its pollutions. Let that separation be lost, and all strength is lost. The conqueror becomes the slave. The clear sight of the judge becomes blindness. The history of Samson repeats itself. How many times has it been, in fact, repeated!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Silence. Israel never turned back and never cried out. God still gave a deliverer, but full rescue waited on a repentance that never came.

- Sovereignty. No one asked Him, yet God passed over the likely choices and took the disgraced tribe of Dan. He can do as it pleases Him.

- Weakness. God chose a nameless, childless woman as His vessel. He picks what the world despises, so that no one can boast before Him.

- Remnant. A whole nation stopped listening. One couple still feared the Lord and talked together — that is what faith looks like in a ruined time.

- Separation. The deliverer's strength was Nazarite strength, held by separation. Lose the separation, and the conqueror becomes the slave.

Judges 13:3 · Darby

And the Angel of Jehovah appeared to the woman, and said to her, Behold now, thou art barren and bearest not; but thou shalt conceive and bear a son.

Israel had lived under Philistine rule for forty years, and this time nobody cried for help. God moved anyway, and the first person He told was a woman with no name and no children.

A deliverance nobody asked for

In the book of Judges, rescue had always followed a cry of distress.

Because of Israel's further disobedience, the Lord brought them under bondage to the Philistines for forty long years (v. 1). In this case we are not told that Israel was broken enough to cry to God for deliverance. It seems that as time went on, Israel became less and less sensitive to the seriousness of their evil condition. But God nevertheless had His eye on His people.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Israel was not just silent. They had settled into the arrangement, and they turned on the man who came to break it.

The Israelites in this instance did not raise the cry for deliverance as on former occasions. They seem to have accepted the yoke and become contented with their lot. This became very evident when Samson began to deliver them, for they scolded him, saying: "Do you not know that the Philistines are rulers over us? What then is this that you have done to us?" They were so completely out of sympathy with all his efforts that they bound him with cords and handed him over to his foes.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

A barren woman, chosen

The message names her barrenness before it names the son.

With Samson we see, from the very start, the sovereign grace which prepares the deliverance. The angel of the Lord announces his birth, with no apparent seeking on man's part. He is the son of a woman who is naturally barren, and the preparation for his coming begins before his birth. This last point implies that there are still conditions to be met if deliverance is to come.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Notice too what the verse leaves out. Her husband has a name; she does not.

The angel of the Lord appeared to the wife of Manoah, a Danite. She was not the one that men would have chosen. Even her name is not given, and she was a barren woman — a reproach among the people of Israel and looked down on by the other women. But this nameless and despised woman of the smallest of Israel's tribes was the vessel chosen by God, through whom He could work out His own will. So we see the great truth emphasised, that His ways are not the ways of men… The woman received God's message in simple and unquestioning faith. Her weakness and reproach are made to stand out, so that it might be clear that this deliverance was to come from God, and not by the power of man. It was out of weakness, barrenness, and death that God was to bring strength and victory.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The messenger who was more than a messenger

The text calls the visitor "the angel of the LORD." That title runs through the Old Testament for the One who brings God's mind to people.

The word for "messenger" is "angel," and this suggests a supernatural revealer of the mind of God. We find this often throughout the Old Testament, where the "angel" made known the will of God (see Judges 2:1; Judges 13:3). The "angel of Jehovah" is indeed His representative, so completely so that He is spoken of as Jehovah Himself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

In some of these appearances the Lord Himself is the speaker. The proof is in what He says.

In certain cases it is plainly the Lord who so presents Himself. See the instances of the Angel who spoke to Abraham… and again of the Angel who visited Manoah, bringing the news of the approaching birth of Samson. In each case the language the Angel used could only have been used by Jehovah Himself.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The mother placed under the vow

The son's vow begins with his mother. She must carry it before he can.

What marks a remnant at all times is Nazariteship — complete "separation to the Lord." This woman had to take Nazariteship upon herself, because she was the one God chose to present the promised deliverer to the people… The Nazariteship of Samson involved that of his mother. In order to honour the deliverer of Israel, his witnesses needed to carry his own character before the eyes of all. This is true at all times. If we do not show Christ down here in His character of complete separation to God, we are not witnesses for our Saviour.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A household that still listened

The nation had stopped listening. God found a husband and wife who had not.

In the middle of this hopeless state of things, God separated a godly remnant and addressed His communications to them. Manoah and his wife feared Jehovah, listened to His voice and spoke to one another (compare Mal. 3:16) — a striking picture of the remnant — the Marys, Elizabeths, Annas, Zacharias and Simeons who waited for the true Messiah, the Saviour of Israel.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Silence. Israel had grown comfortable under Philistine rule and never cried out. God's eye was still on them.

- Visit. Grace moves first. God announces the birth before anyone asks, through a messenger who speaks as the Lord Himself.

- Weakness. God picks a barren, unnamed woman from the smallest tribe. Out of weakness He brings strength and victory.

- Separation. The son's separation to God begins with his mother. Whoever presents God's deliverer must first carry his character.

- Remnant. When a whole nation stops listening, God speaks to the few who still do. Those who waited for the Messiah were such a few.

Judges 13:4 · Darby

And now beware, I pray thee, and drink not wine nor strong drink, and eat nothing unclean.

Israel lay under Philistine oppression when a messenger promised a childless woman a son. First, though, came rules for her own eating and drinking: the mother had to live as her son would live.

Why the vow lasted a lifetime

The kind of deliverer God raises up says something about the state of His people. One writer sees this lifelong separation as proof of how far Israel had drifted from God:

In the next chapter (Judges 13) we begin a new kind of instrument God raised up for His purpose. In this case the state of the people was such that God separates him to Himself as a Nazarite. There could be no stronger proof that the people, as a whole, were far from God. In all ordinary cases a Nazarite was someone who had taken a special vow of separation to God. But that vow lasted only a short time. Here it was an extraordinary Nazariteship, stretching through his whole life.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What wine and strong drink stand for

The ban is not on something shameful. Wine belongs to harvest, celebration and song, which is exactly why giving it up says so much:

Wine, the grape, is a figure of human joy and human strength. The harvest time, when they gathered the grapes and the juice burst from the vats, always meant celebration, songs and gladness. It was the time of joy... It comes at the high point of the year, when everything is ripe and ready to enjoy.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Giving up wine raises a question: where do joy and strength come from instead?

The Nazarite had to stay away from "wine and strong drink." These would point to what gratifies, stimulates and excites the flesh... As Nazarites we do not need the joys of men. We do not need the world to hold us up. Our joy and strength are in the Lord.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Not eating anything unclean

The second half of the command reaches beyond drink. This vow also differs from the law of separation in Numbers 6:

Compare Numbers 6:1-8, which chapter speaks of the vow as being voluntary. But God had decided this for Samson before his birth... Eating unclean meats would speak of indulging in unclean, sinful practices. Her character and actions would shape the son she was to have. We too have a responsibility not to be a bad influence on others.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the mother shares the vow

Why do the restrictions fall on her at all? Because a witness has to carry the mark of the one he represents:

The Nazariteship of Samson involved that of his mother. To honour the deliverer of Israel, his witnesses had to carry the stamp of his own character where everyone could see it. This is true at all times. If we do not show Christ down here in His character of entire separation to God, we are not witnesses for our Saviour.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

A barren woman, and glory to God

The account never names her, and the angel's message passes over her husband. One writer finds purpose in that silence:

It is to the woman, however, that the angel first appears, and we are not told her name. The angel reminds her of her barrenness, so that God's grace and power may stand out all the more. She herself is nothing. Her name does not matter, and the angel's message does not mention her husband's name either. Everything here is of God... What a blessing follows when God receives all the glory! Man admits that by nature he has forfeited everything, so that grace may be grace.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Separation that can be held or lost

A separated calling can still be blurred by the company a person keeps:

Samson had to be a "Nazarite to God from the womb." He was to deliver God's people from the unholy oppression they were under. So he had to be completely separate from all the enjoyments among them. His mother is taught this, and trains him accordingly. Our early training has a special and lasting effect on our later life. By training I mean the company that surrounds us. Samson was a Nazarite, but he grew up close to the Philistines and at home among them. As a result, he never seems aware of the great moral contrast that should exist between a Nazarite and a Philistine.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — Israel had fallen far from God under the Philistines. So God called for separation that lasts a whole lifetime, not the short vow of ordinary cases.

- Gift — The deliverer starts in a barren womb, and the story never gives the mother a name. All the credit goes to God.

- Cost — She gives up wine, not sin. Wine stands for natural joy and strength, and unclean food goes too. Her joy and strength must come from the Lord instead.

- Reach — Numbers 6 makes the vow a free choice. Here God decides it before birth, and the mother's character shapes the son she will raise.

- Result — Separation kept is strength. Samson grew up at ease among the Philistines, and he never seemed to feel the difference between a Nazarite and a Philistine.

Judges 13:5 · Darby

For lo, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son, and no razor shall come on his head; for the boy shall be a Nazarite of God from the womb; and he shall begin to save Israel out of the hand of the Philistines.

Israel had sunk so low under the Philistines that no one even cried to God for help. Yet God promised Manoah's wife a son set apart to Him from the womb, with hair no razor would touch, sent only to begin Israel's rescue.

Grace that moves before the cry

Every earlier decline in Judges records Israel crying to the Lord. This one does not.

This is the sixth and last decline of Israel in this book, and the darkest period. The Philistines lorded it over Israel. This time we miss the words found in every earlier departure from Jehovah: "And the people of Israel cried out to the LORD." There is no cry here, and no return to the Lord. It seems the greatest indifference controlled the people, so that they had no desire to cry to the Lord. And when we come to the deliverance we find that it was an imperfect one. God announced Samson's work in one phrase: he would begin to save Israel from the hand of the Philistines. And how did he end? He died as a captive of the Philistines.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A vow he did not choose

A man took the Nazirite vow on himself, and only for a set time. Samson's case was different in two ways.

The name Nazirite means "a separated one." According to Numbers 6 a man might vow to separate himself to the Lord for a set period. If he did, he came under a threefold obligation, which he had to keep "all the days of his separation." The only case recorded in the Old Testament is Samson. He was to be a lifelong Nazirite from his birth, as we see in Judges 13:5. He did not take the vow on himself — God placed it on him, and his supernatural strength depended on his keeping it faithfully. We all know the story of how he was seduced away from it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why no razor

One writer explains what long hair on a man stood for.

Long hair separated the Nazirite, in figure, from self, his dignity, and all that goes with it. It was at the same time the token of dependence and dishonour (1 Cor. 11). The Nazirite's long hair announced in public that he had given up his dignity and personal rights as a man, so that he could devote himself to the service of God. What was glory for the woman was shame for him. The man born to this dignity set it aside; the man appointed to rule submitted to the Lord as a wife to her husband. Without this dependence there can be neither service for God nor power for it. What was a sign of weakness for the Nazirite became the source of his strength.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Separated to God, not just from things

The words to God matter more than the list of things the boy had to avoid.

Nazariteship was the outstanding feature in the man who was to overthrow the power of the Philistine. Twice over in the announcement to Manoah's wife the angel of the Lord stated: the child shall be a Nazirite to God. A Nazirite had to be separate from certain things. But what he was separated to mattered more than all of this. He was to be "to the Lord," a devoted vessel for the service of God.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Only the beginning

God promised a start, not a finish.

Samson had in him the Spirit of Nazariteship, that is, separation to the Lord. Note it well, my reader: he was raised up to "begin to save Israel from the hand of the Philistines." He would only start the work, for he was not Christ! He might "begin" the work; the true David alone could finish it. Note too that his name, Samson, means "Sun-like," from Shemesh — the "Sun" of Righteousness Himself.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Samson measured against Christ

How far does Samson picture Christ? One writer limits the likeness to his mission.

Samson, the Nazirite, is hardly a type of Christ except in his mission (Judges 13:5). He is rather a picture of the testimony that the church of God gives. That testimony stands in separation from the world, in the power of the Spirit, and in communion with the Lord. His history, though full of acts of power, is still one of the saddest accounts in the word. Compare his Nazariteship with that of Christ, and how striking Samson's shortfall appears!

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The lasting lesson

The rule holds beyond Samson.

Samson is the only person in Israel spoken of as a Nazirite, and his being "a Nazirite to God from the womb" was the secret of his great strength. Separation to God is the secret of spiritual strength. Whenever a man gives up moral separation, he loses spiritual power and the sense of the Lord's support.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace first. Israel never cried for help this time. God announced a deliverer anyway. The rescue started on His side, not theirs.

- Grace given, not earned. Samson never chose the vow. God placed it on him before birth, and his strength hung on keeping it.

- Grace worn openly. The uncut hair was a public surrender of a man's dignity and rights: weakness by nature, strength before God.

- Grace aimed somewhere. He was separated to God, a vessel for His service; what he was separated from mattered less than who he was for.

- Grace unfinished. God promised him a beginning only. The full rescue waited for another, and Samson died a prisoner of the enemy he came to break.

Judges 13:6 · Darby

And the woman came and told her husband, saying, A man of God came to me, and his appearance was like the appearance of an angel of God, very terrible; but I did not ask him whence he was, neither did he tell me his name.

Israel had lived under Philistine rule for forty years. Then a stranger walked up to a childless woman and told her she would have a son. She went to her husband with the news. Her report describes a visitor she could not identify. His face frightened her, and He left no name behind.

Grace That Was Never Asked For

Nothing in the chapter records anyone praying for a deliverer. The visit arrives entirely from God's side.

From the very start, Samson's story shows us the sovereign grace that prepares the deliverance. His birth is announced by the angel of the Lord, apart from any apparent seeking on man's part. He is the son of a woman naturally barren, and the preparation for his coming comes before his birth. This last point implies that there are still conditions to be met if deliverance is to come.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Her barrenness is not an obstacle to the plan; it is part of it. One writer puts the point sharply:

She received God's message in simple, unquestioning faith. Her weakness and shame are made to stand out. This makes it clear that the deliverance was to come from God, and not by the power of man. It was out of weakness, barrenness, and death that God was to bring strength and victory.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The Visitor Who Left No Name

She calls Him "a man of God" and compares His face to an angel's. Commentators read this appearing as God Himself coming in visible form.

It is true that in Old Testament times there were heavenly visitors to earth, who appeared as angels. In certain cases it is plainly the Lord who presents Himself this way. Take the Angel who spoke to Abraham. Abraham recognised who He was when the doom of the cities of the plain was announced. Take the Man who wrestled with Jacob at the brook Jabbok. Take again the Angel who visited Manoah with the news that Samson was about to be born. In each case the language the Angel used could only have been used by Jehovah Himself.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The name He held back here is given later in the chapter. One writer ties the answer to Isaiah's prophecy:

The messenger, the Angel of the Lord, is the One who appeared to Moses in the burning bush — Jehovah Himself. When asked "What is your name?" He answers: "It is Wonderful" (Isaiah 9:6).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Awe Without Acquaintance

Her own words admit two gaps: she did not ask where He came from, and He did not tell her His name. Commentators read her differently. One notes the simple faith with which she took the message. Another reads her admission as a measure of how little she knew God.

This poor woman had very little understanding. She did not know where the angel came from or who He was. She did not even ask Him. That shows how slight her acquaintance with God was. The presence of the God of promises did not give her confidence. It frightened her. All she saw in the angel's face was something "very terrible."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

(Older translations read "very terrible" where the ESV has "very awesome.")

What God Asks For Before Understanding

Manoah prayed for a second visit so he could learn more. The answer he received put something else first.

Knowledge is not the first thing God requires. Manoah and his wife had genuine godliness. But neither that nor knowledge is enough to keep us in the middle of the ruin. What they needed before knowledge was true personal separation to God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Wife Who Carried the Message Home

She did not keep the encounter to herself. Her report sent her husband to prayer.

The woman then came to her husband, Manoah, to tell him of this unusual visit and the message given her by the Angel. Manoah was impressed, but felt it a heavy responsibility to raise a son who was to have a special place in Israel. So he prayed that God would send the Angel back to teach them how to care for and train their son. God answered this request by the Angel appearing again to the woman while she was alone.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Unsought. No one asked for a rescuer. Sovereign grace began the deliverance before the deliverer was born.

- Unnamed. She could only call Him a man of God with an angel's face. Commentators say this was the Lord Himself. The name He held back is given later: "Wonderful."

- Unknown. Her honest report shows how little she knew Him. His presence frightened her; it did not reassure her.

- Unhurried. Manoah asked for more information. God pressed separation to Himself first, not a fuller explanation.

- Unkept. She did not hold the news back but carried it home, and a praying household received a second visit.

Judges 13:7 · Darby

And he said to me, Behold, thou shalt conceive and bear a son; and now drink not wine nor strong drink, and eat not anything unclean; for the boy shall be a Nazarite of God from the womb to the day of his death.

Manoah's wife repeats the messenger's words to her husband. She adds one detail: the boy's separation will last his whole life. Why does God set a man apart before he is born? And what happens when that man lets the separation go?

Why God Set One Man Apart

God now raises up a new kind of deliverer, and that difference says something about the nation's state.

In Judges 13 we begin a new kind of instrument God raised up for His purpose. The state of the people was such that God separates him to Himself as a Nazarite. You could not ask for stronger proof that the people, as a whole, were far from God. Normally a Nazarite was someone who had taken a special vow of separation to God, but only for a short time. Here it was an extraordinary Nazariteship, stretching through his whole life.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

When God's people have accepted the rule of their enemies, one road back remains open.

When God's people lose the truth of their calling, and through unfaithfulness submit to the rule of the enemy, only one thing gives power: Nazariteship — entire separation to God... Samson was raised up to deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philistines. He could only fulfil that mission by being separated to God from his birth, by staying apart from the joys of human life and from all the defilements of the world, and by keeping complete subjection to God's authority and dependence on His strength.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What the Word Itself Means

The title itself carries the meaning, and the meaning stings. (Older translations spell it "Nazarite".)

The very word "Nazarite" means separation. How it cuts, that word "separation"; how it hurts; how self-righteous it sounds. But God says that true victory for His people must come on the lines of Nazariteship — separation from the very things the world counts absolutely necessary.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From the Womb — Not a Vow He Chose

Numbers 6 describes a vow a person takes up for a set time and then lays down. Samson's case reverses the order: God announced the separation before Samson could agree to it.

In Numbers 6 Nazariteship is a vow of separation to the Lord for a particular time and purpose. When the time ended, the Nazarite kept the prescribed rites and returned to the ordinary life of one of God's people. He therefore pictures someone called out for special service. In the power of the Holy Spirit, such a person rises above the claims and enjoyments of nature. He gives up his name and place among men. Nothing distracts or entangles him, so he walks the path of holiness completely at the Lord's disposal. God marked Samson out for a particular mission. But this came before his birth, so he pictures something wider: Christians in general. They are set apart to God from the very start, whatever position they may finally have to occupy.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Mother Under the Same Rule

The instructions about wine and unclean food in this verse fall on her, not on the child.

This woman had to take Nazariteship upon herself, because she was the vessel chosen by God to present the promised deliverer to the people... The Nazariteship of Samson involved that of his mother. To honour the deliverer of Israel, his witnesses had to carry the stamp of his own character where everyone could see it. This is true at all times. If we do not show Christ down here in His character of entire separation to God, we are not witnesses for our Saviour.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Where the Strength Came From

Samson's uncut hair looks like an arbitrary rule until you watch what happens when it goes.

Samson's strength was a mystery to the Philistines... But that great strength depended entirely on his consecration as a Nazarite. When his hair was cut off, he became as weak as a child: even a woman, Delilah, was then stronger than he.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The Place Without the Walk

Samson kept the position described in this verse. He did not keep the walk that belongs to it.

A child can be a Nazarite; but this is the work of God. We have two examples of Nazarites from birth. One went on blamelessly, the other failed sadly: John the Baptist and Samson... Samson served God, and did great things too. But he also sought and did his own will, so his life ended with him as a prisoner... So you see it is not everything to be in the place of a Nazarite. There must be self-denial and patient perseverance in the ways of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Separation begins in ruin. The nation as a whole had drifted far from God, so He set one man apart for life. An extraordinary collapse called for an extraordinary separation.

- Separation is the word. "Nazarite" means separated — separation from the very things the world counts necessary.

- Separation is given, not chosen. The Numbers 6 vow was temporary. Samson's began in the womb — a picture of believers marked out for God from the start.

- Separation spreads. The mother lived under the same rules. Those who present the deliverer must carry his character.

- Separation is strength. Samson's power rested on his consecration. But holding the place without self-denial ended in captivity, not victory.

Judges 13:8 · Darby

Then Manoah prayed to Jehovah, and said, Ah Lord! let the man of God which thou didst send come again unto us, I pray thee, and teach us what we shall do unto the child that shall be born.

A messenger from God promised Manoah's wife a son with a special place in Israel. Manoah's first move was not celebration but prayer — he asked God to send the visitor back and teach them how to raise the boy.

A prayer that takes God at His word

Manoah had not seen the messenger himself. He had only his wife's report, and he prayed on it.

There was real faith in God's word, and a true desire to know the mind of God. In answer to this prayer, the angel of the Lord returns to Manoah's wife, who hurried to call her husband.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The weight behind the request

Manoah did not pray out of curiosity. The job in front of him felt bigger than he was.

Manoah was impressed, but felt it a heavy responsibility to train a son who was to have a special place in Israel. He prayed therefore that God would send the Angel back to teach them how to care for or train their son (v. 8). God answered this prayer: the Angel appeared again to the woman while she was alone.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Grace grants a second visit

Commentators read Manoah differently. Some see plain faith. Others see a man eager to hear it all over again, who learned nothing his wife had not already been told.

Manoah had prayed that the Lord would send the messenger a second time, and He in grace grants the request. But notice, when the angel comes he comes to her — he always comes to weakness — and she goes and calls for her husband. When he comes, notice that Manoah is very anxious to hear all about it over again. He gets no more than his wife had already received: simple instructions about Nazariteship.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Both readings agree on the main fact: God listened. As one writer puts it, husband and wife together brought the matter to God, and God answered.

The woman then tells her husband of the angel's visit, and they both plead with Jehovah, Manoah especially, that the man of God might be sent again. Jehovah listens, and His angel appears to the woman, who calls her husband, and both see the angel as he repeats his message with its solemn command.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Separation comes before information

Manoah asked what to do with the child. The reply pointed back to his wife and to the rules she had already been given. That redirection is the heart of the chapter.

Manoah himself, a man of sincere piety, had little understanding, but he wanted more. He wished to know "what to do with the child" (v. 8), and then "what is his work" (v. 12). The angel of Jehovah did not answer his questions. Instead he said: "Of all that I said to the woman let her beware… All that I commanded her let her observe" (vv. 13, 14). Why? Because knowledge is not the first thing God asks of us. Manoah and his wife had true piety. But neither knowledge nor piety is enough to keep us while everything around is in ruin. What they needed before knowledge was true personal separation to God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Nazariteship means a life set apart to God. In Samson's case it was to last his whole life, and one writer ties that to the state God's people were in.

Separation from what an Israelite was normally allowed was not only commanded but made lifelong in Samson's case. I cannot help believing this is significant of what was due to God because of the state His people were then in.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The mother's part

The angel gave no training plan. What He repeated instead landed on the mother.

The Angel of the Lord, however, did not give any more information than He had given to Manoah's wife. He does not say anything about the boy's training. Why not? Because the boy should be trained just as any other boy should be trained. But He does stress the responsibility of the mother. She was not to eat anything that came from the vine, or drink wine, or eat anything unclean (vv. 13-14). This is a striking witness that the character and actions of a mother will have great influence over her children.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Manoah's prayer models for parents

Manoah's instinct was to ask God how to do this. Every parent needs the same instinct.

We are not called to make them anything. We are simply called to do our duty by them, and leave results to God. We are instructed and commanded to bring up our children "in the discipline and instruction of the Lord." When is this bringing up to begin? When are we to start the sacred work of training our little ones? Surely at the beginning. The very moment we enter a relationship, we enter also the responsibility that relationship brings… It is true — and thank God for it — that His grace is enough for us in this as in everything else. And "If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Faith. Manoah had only second-hand news of a promise. He prayed on it anyway — real faith in God's word, and a real desire to know God's mind.

- Weight. He felt that raising this son was a heavy responsibility. He would not try it on guesswork.

- Grace. God sent the messenger back, and sent him to the wife first — God comes to weakness.

- Separation. Manoah got nothing beyond what his wife already had. Knowledge is not the first thing God asks of us; separation to Him is.

- Duty. Parents cannot make their children anything. They can start at the beginning, do their duty, ask God for wisdom, and leave the results to Him.

Judges 13:9 · Darby

And God hearkened to the voice of Manoah; and the Angel of God came again to the woman whilst she sat in the field; but Manoah her husband was not with her.

Manoah learned of the visitor only second-hand, from his wife, and he asked God to send the man back to teach them how to raise the promised son. Verse 9 is the answer: God listened, and the messenger came again — not to the man who prayed, and not to the house, but to the woman, alone in the field.

A prayer God was willing to answer

One writer traces the prayer back to its cause:

Manoah was impressed, but felt it a heavy responsibility to train a son who was to have a special place in Israel. He prayed therefore that God would send the Angel back to teach them how to care for or train their son (v. 8). God answered this request by the appearance of the Angel again to the woman while she was alone. She ran to call her husband, who came at once (vv. 9-11).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two things lay behind the prayer:

There was real faith in God's word, and a true desire to know the mind of God. In answer to this prayer, the angel of the Lord returns to Manoah's wife, who made haste to call her husband.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

God answers — on His own terms

Manoah asked God to send the messenger to them. The messenger came again to her.

Manoah had prayed that the Lord would send the messenger a second time, and He in grace grants the request. But notice, when the angel comes he comes to her — he always comes to weakness — and she goes and calls for her husband.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A hesitant man steadied by a second visit

Manoah was slower than his wife to be sure of what he had heard. God met that uncertainty with a second visit:

It is the woman who receives the divine communication most readily. Manoah, godly as he is, does not feel so sure of its character and meaning. But he looks to God, and is confirmed by the angel's second visit. This is still to the woman first, but she may call her husband, so that he too may hear from the angel's lips.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Who the messenger was

Verse 9 calls Him "the angel of God." Manoah did not yet see who stood in front of him:

Manoah as yet recognizes only a human messenger, even while he recognizes the message… He cannot yet understand, and would learn the name of the speaker, so that when His word comes true they may give Him honor as a man. So the angel asks why he should ask after His name. Yet He adds what might well justify the question: His name is "Wonderful," a name which Isaiah later gives to Immanuel (Isaiah 9:6). And here, indeed, God and man are brought together in one Person.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The same word, not a new one

Manoah asked to be taught. The angel gave him back the instruction his wife already had — the Nazirite rules of a life set apart to God — and one writer draws out why:

Instead of answering his questions, the angel of Jehovah said to him: "Of all that I said to the woman let her beware. She may not eat of anything that comes from the vine, neither let her drink wine or strong drink, nor eat any unclean thing. All that I commanded her let her observe." Why? Because knowledge is not the first thing God asks for. Neither knowledge, nor even the true piety of Manoah and his wife, is enough to keep us while everything around us is in ruin. What they needed before knowledge was true personal separation to God — a separation patterned and measured by the Nazirite life of the one who was about to appear.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the weak one is the one visited

The chapter never gives her a name:

Here is a poor nameless woman, nameless helplessness; what could be weaker than that?… The word of God reaches nameless helplessness. That living word assures her that life and power will come through her — the nameless one, whose weakness alone appeals to God. When did weakness ever appeal to Him in vain? When did a sense of utter helplessness ever lay itself at God's feet without His making use of it? It is our strength, our energy, that He has to break to pieces. It is our helplessness that He can use, our utter worthlessness.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. Manoah prayed out of real faith in God's word and a genuine desire to know God's mind about the child — and God listened.

- Answered. God answered in grace, but on His own terms: the messenger came back to the wife, not to the husband who prayed.

- Weakness. He always comes to weakness. God keeps visiting a woman with no name. He never turns away helplessness laid at His feet.

- Confirmed. The second visit steadied Manoah, who still saw only a man — though the name of his visitor was "Wonderful," God and man brought together in one Person.

- Separation. Manoah got no new information, only the old instruction repeated. Knowledge is not the first thing God asks for; separation to Himself comes first.

Judges 13:10 · Darby

Then the woman hasted and ran, and informed her husband, and said to him, Behold, the man has appeared to me, that came to me that day.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 13:11 · Darby

And Manoah rose up and went after his wife, and came to the man, and said to him, Art thou the man that didst speak to the woman? And he said, I am.

Manoah had asked God to send the man of God back to teach him and his wife how to raise the promised son. This verse is the answer to that prayer, and his opening question shows how little he still knew about the visitor in front of him.

A prayer taken seriously

The first message came to his wife while she was alone. Manoah asked God to send it again, for both of them.

When the angel of God spoke to the wife of Manoah about the birth of Samson, Manoah prayed to the Lord. He said, "O Lord, please let the man of God whom You sent come again to us and teach us what we are to do with the child who will be born" (Judges 13:8). There was real faith in God's word, and a true desire to know the mind of God. In answer to this prayer, the angel of the Lord returns to Manoah's wife, who hurried to call her husband.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The second visit

God answered the prayer, but the messenger went to the wife again. Manoah had to walk to where she was.

Manoah had prayed that the Lord would send the messenger a second time, and He in grace grants the request. But notice, when the angel comes he comes to her — always comes to weakness — and she goes and calls her husband. When he comes, notice that Manoah is very anxious to hear it all over again. He gets no more than his wife had already received: simple instructions about being a Nazirite.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Who the visitor was

Manoah's question treats the visitor as a man. Writers compare this visit with other Old Testament appearances of the same kind.

It is true that in Old Testament times there were heavenly visitors to earth who appeared as angels. In certain cases it is plainly the Lord who presents Himself this way. See the Angel who spoke to Abraham about the doom of the cities of the plain, and how Abraham recognised who He was. See the Man who wrestled with Jacob at the brook Jabbok. See again the Angel who visited Manoah with the news of Samson's coming birth. In each case the Angel spoke words that only the Lord Himself could have spoken.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The reply is short: "I am."

What he asked, what he got

Manoah wanted instructions: what to do with the boy, and what the boy would do. The answer sends him back to what his wife must avoid.

Manoah himself, a sincere and godly man, had little understanding, but he wanted more. He wished to know "what to do with the child" (v. 8), then "what shall he do" (v. 12). Instead of answering his questions, the angel of the Lord said to him: "Of all that I said to the woman, let her beware"... Why? Because knowledge is not the first thing God requires. Neither knowledge nor even the true godliness Manoah and his wife had is enough to keep us standing in the middle of the ruin. What they needed before knowledge was true personal separation to God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer points to where the instruction went instead:

The Angel of the Lord, however, did not give any more information than He had given to Manoah's wife. He says nothing about the boy's training. Why not? Because the boy should be trained just as any other boy should be trained. But He does stress the responsibility of the mother. She was not to eat anything that came from the vine, nor to drink wine, nor eat anything unclean (vv. 13-14). This is a striking witness that the character and actions of a mother will have great influence over her children.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Two people God could talk to

The nation was in ruin. God's word went to a husband and wife who prayed and listened together.

In the middle of this hopeless state of things, God set apart a godly remnant and addressed His communications to them. Manoah and his wife feared the Lord, listened to His voice, and spoke to one another. They are a striking picture of the remnant — the Marys, Elizabeths, Annas, Zechariahs and Simeons — who waited for the true Messiah, the Saviour of Israel.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Asked — Manoah prayed for the messenger to come back, and behind it lay real faith and a true desire to know God's mind.

- Answered — God sent the visitor back, but to the wife again. Grace comes to weakness, and Manoah had to follow her to it.

- Approached — He asked, "Are you the man?" He was speaking to One whose words only the Lord could speak.

- Answered less — He got no new information, only the call to separation. Knowledge is not the first thing God asks for.

- Together — God set apart a couple who feared Him and spoke to one another, and gave them His message for a ruined nation.

Judges 13:12 · Darby

And Manoah said, When thy words then come to pass, what shall be the child's manner and his doing?

Israel had been under Philistine rule for forty years when an angel promised a childless woman a son set apart to God. When the messenger came back at her husband's request, Manoah asked about the boy: what would his life be, and what would his work be?

What Manoah's question meant

The older English rendering makes Manoah sound like a man asking for a childcare manual. One writer, reviewing the translation, argues the Hebrew is doing something different:

Judges 13:12, Manoah's question, as given by the Authorised Version ("How shall we order the child? and how shall we do to him?") fails to convey what he really did say. "What shall be the manner (condition) of the child, and his work?"

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

So the question is not about method. Manoah wants to know what this child is to be, and what he is to do.

A father feeling the weight

The question did not come from idle curiosity. Behind it lay a prayer:

Manoah was impressed, but felt it a heavy responsibility to train a son who was to have a special place in Israel. He prayed therefore that God would send the Angel back to teach them how to care for or train their son (v. 8). God answered this request by sending the Angel again to the woman while she was alone. She ran to call her husband, who came at once, and he asked how the boy should be trained in view of his work.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Notice who God went to: the wife again, and not Manoah.

The answer that adds nothing new

The messenger repeats what he told the wife. He says nothing about how to raise the boy:

The Angel of the Lord however did not give any more information than He had to Manoah's wife. He does not say anything about the boy's training. Why not? Because the boy should be trained just as any other boy should be trained. But He does emphasize the responsibility of the mother. She was not to eat anything that came from the vine, or drink wine, or eat anything unclean (vv. 13-14). This is a striking witness that the character and actions of a mother will have great influence over her children.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The father asked about the child; the answer came back about the parent.

Separation comes before knowledge

Another writer sees an order of priorities in that refusal. Manoah was sincere and wanted to understand more. But understanding was not God's first concern:

Manoah himself, a sincerely godly man, had little understanding, but he wanted more. He wished to know "what to do with the child" (v. 8), then, "what shall he do" (v. 12, margin). Instead of answering his questions, the angel of the Lord said to him: "Of all that I said to the woman let her beware…" Why? Because knowledge is not the first thing that God requires. Neither knowledge nor even true godliness, such as Manoah and his wife had, is enough to keep us in the middle of the ruin. What they needed before knowledge was true personal separation to God — a separation patterned and measured by the Nazirite separation of the one who was about to appear.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer explains why the mother had to share her son's Nazirite life — the life of a person set apart to God:

Samson's Nazirite separation involved his mother's too. To honour the deliverer of Israel, his witnesses had to show everyone the mark of his own character. This is true at all times.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The One Manoah was questioning

Manoah did not realise whose instructions he was receiving. He asked for a name, and the answer settled it:

Manoah asked Him His Name, so that he might honour Him when the child was born, and the answer was, "Why do you ask My name, seeing it is wonderful (or secret)?" This was nothing less than one of the appearances of God in the Old Testament, the Lord being present in the form of an angel.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Instruction given in advance

The instruction Manoah asked for was definite, and God gave it to the parents, not to the boy. One writer draws out what that meant later on:

God had instructed his parents entirely apart from him. Their failure was their own, separate from Samson's failure. What answer could Manoah give to the angel of the Lord who had given him such definite instruction as to how they should bring him up?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Ask. Manoah's question is about what his son will be and what his work will be — a father wanting God's mind, not a technique.

- Answered. God heard the prayer and sent the messenger back a second time.

- Redirected. The messenger gave no new instruction about the boy. He turned instead to the mother's own conduct, because a mother's character shapes her child.

- Separation first. God's first requirement was not knowledge, and not even sincere godliness. It was real personal separation to Him — measured by the separation of the son who was coming.

- Sobering. God gave clear instruction to both parents. Their later failure did not come from ignorance.

Judges 13:13 · Darby

And the Angel of Jehovah said to Manoah, Of all that I said unto the woman let her beware

Manoah had just asked how to raise the promised son. The angel's reply gives him nothing new; it sends him back to what his wife had already heard.

A question answered by repetition

Manoah prayed for a second visit so that he could hear the instruction himself. What he received was the same message over again.

When he comes you notice that Manoah is very anxious to know all about it over again. He gets no more than his wife had received before — simple instructions about Nazariteship.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer draws out why the angel says nothing about how to bring the boy up.

The Angel of the Lord, however, did not give any more information than He had given to Manoah's wife. He says nothing about the boy's training. Why not? Because the boy should be brought up just like any other boy. But He does emphasise the responsibility of the mother.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Separation comes before knowledge

Manoah asked his questions in sincerity. One writer says God wanted something from him before knowledge.

Instead of answering his questions, the angel of Jehovah said to him: "Of all that I said to the woman let her be careful… all that I commanded her let her observe." Why? Because knowledge is not the first thing God requires. Neither knowledge nor even true piety, such as was found in Manoah and his wife, is enough to keep us while everything around is in ruin. What they needed before knowledge was true personal separation to God — a separation whose pattern and measure was the Nazirite life of the son who was about to appear.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the mother was told to watch

A Nazirite was someone set apart to God by a vow, with the rules listed in Numbers 6. One writer checks those rules against what the mother was told.

She is told not to drink wine or strong drink and not to eat anything unclean. So she is commanded, as the mother of the Nazirite, the same things that apply to the Nazirite himself in Numbers 6. But one thing addressed to the Nazirite in Numbers 6 is not mentioned for his mother — that she should let her hair grow long. Why not? Did God forget her? No, God did not forget her; God assumes that a woman's hair grows freely, without being cut.

Modernised from Eric TachoiresOriginal wording

A mother's life shapes her son's

Each restriction pictures something she is to hold back from, and the effect reaches past her.

Wine speaks of exhilarating joy, and certainly a mother should give up any self-indulgent living (1 Tim. 5:6). Eating unclean meats would speak of indulging in unclean, sinful practices. She was to have a son who would be influenced by her character and actions. We too have a responsibility not to influence others badly.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ridout names a second thing wine stands for.

Wine, the grape, is a figure of human joy and human strength… wine is a figure, too, of stimulus, that which stimulates the natural man. People speak of being strengthened as with wine — the blood racing, every muscle tense under a stimulus that has given, sadly, a false strength. That is how wine speaks of human joy and human strength.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Obedience holds the strength in place

These rules did not end with the mother. One writer shows what hung on Samson's own keeping of them.

There was one separated to God, set apart for Jehovah, and therefore placed under defined obedience; his hair was not to be cut. While he kept the command, his strength stayed with him. There might have seemed little connection between uncut hair and all-conquering strength. But God was in it. A God we obey and honour is a God of strength to us. It was God's strength, given to one who so definitely recognised Him; it was a gift whose keeping hung on obedience. The point I insist on is this: the sign of his separation to obedience was the hinge on which the possession of that given strength turned. When the sign was there, so was the strength; when it went, the strength went with it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The parents answered for themselves

Because the instruction was given to them directly, their obedience was their own matter — not something that stood or fell with their son's later conduct.

God had instructed his parents quite apart from him. It was a failure on their part, entirely separate from Samson's failure. What answer could Manoah give to the angel of the Lord, who had given him such definite instruction about how they should bring him up?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Asked. Manoah wanted a rule for the child. The angel gave him back the rule his wife already had, and no more.

- Answered. God asked first for separation, not information. Sincere piety alone would not keep them.

- Shared. The mother lived under the Nazirite's own rules. Her character would shape the son she carried.

- Held. Samson's power was a gift. Obedience to the sign of his separation held it in place, and when the sign went, the strength went.

- Accountable. The parents answered to God for their own obedience, whatever their son became.

Judges 13:14 · Darby

she shall not eat of anything that cometh of the vine, neither shall she drink wine or strong drink, nor eat anything unclean all that I commanded her shall she observe.

Manoah had asked the Angel a practical question: what should they do with the boy who was coming? The Angel gives no new instructions and only repeats what his wife had already heard — so why does God answer a question with a command?

Separation Before Knowledge

One writer treats that silence as the point of the passage.

He wanted to know "what to do with the child" (v. 8), then "what shall he do" (v. 12, margin). Instead of answering his questions, the angel of the Lord said to him: "Of all that I said to the woman let her beware… all that I commanded her let her observe" (vv. 13, 14). Why? Because knowledge is not the first thing that God requires. Neither it, nor even true piety, such as was found in Manoah and his wife, is enough to keep us in the middle of the ruin. What they needed before knowledge was true personal separation to God. That separation had its pattern and its measure in the Nazariteship of the one who was about to appear.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer notes what the Angel leaves out, and where He puts the weight.

The Angel of the Lord however did not give any more information than He had to Manoah's wife. He does not say anything about the boy's training. Why not? Because the boy should be trained just as any other boy should be trained. But He does emphasize the responsibility of the mother.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Mother Under Her Son's Vow

A Nazarite was a person set apart to God by a vow, with rules laid out in Numbers 6. One writer lines up that list with what the Angel told Samson's mother.

In verses 4, 7, and 14, she is told not to drink wine or strong drink and not to eat anything unclean. So she is commanded, as the mother of the Nazarite, the same things that apply to the Nazarite himself in Numbers 6. But Numbers 6 addresses one thing to the Nazarite that is never mentioned to his mother, who should let her hair grow long. Why not? Did God forget her? No, God did not forget her, but God assumes that a woman's hair grows freely, without being cut.

Modernised from Eric TachoiresOriginal wording

Why should her diet matter for his calling? One writer answers by pointing to what she was chosen to carry.

This woman had to take Nazariteship on herself. She was the vessel chosen by God to present the promised deliverer to the people… The Nazariteship of Samson involved that of his mother. To honour the deliverer of Israel, his witnesses had to carry the stamp of his own character where everyone could see it. This is true at all times. If we do not show Christ here in His character of complete separation to God, we are not witnesses for our Saviour.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Vine And Wine: Two Different Words

The verse names the vine and it names wine. Are they two words for one thing? One writer answers from the Hebrew of the matching rule in Numbers 6.

In Numbers 6, gephen — the regular word for the vine — appears, and so does yayin, which also appears in Judges 13:14. Yayin is not a synonymous filler; it is there for greater accuracy. It is true that gephen alone is the general Hebrew term for "vine." Still, yayin is clearly added here, because it conveys not the same idea but another one, completing and defining the sense.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What The Vine Stands For

The ban covers the whole plant, not just the drink. So what is dangerous about wine?

Our joy comes from a purer spring than the wine vat. Our strength comes from a mightier source than anything that merely stimulates nature. By wine, Scripture does not mean the literal, material thing. It means whatever stimulates and stirs up the flesh. One can be a complete teetotaler about wine, and yet be absolutely under its power, spiritually speaking. We have to avoid everything that simply gives fleshly energy, fleshly stimulus, or fleshly excitement in the things of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Wine, Uncleanness, And Influence

Why these bans at all? One writer starts with how Samson came under them, then reads what wine and unclean food stand for.

Numbers 6:1-8 speaks of the vow as being voluntary. But God had decided this for Samson before his birth… Wine speaks of exhilarating joy, and certainly a mother should give up any kind of "living in pleasure" (1 Tim. 5:6, older wording). Eating unclean meats would speak of indulging in unclean, sinful practices. She was to have a son who would be influenced by her character and actions. We too have a responsibility not to influence others badly.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Separation first. Manoah asked what to do. God repeated a command instead, because separation comes before knowledge.

- Separation shared. The mother took on her son's restrictions. The one who carried the deliverer had to carry his stamp.

- Separation exact. The ban reaches past the cup to the whole plant. The Hebrew has one word for the vine and another for wine.

- Separation inward. Wine pictures whatever stirs up the flesh. A person can drink nothing and still live on it.

- Separation seen. Her food was never a private matter. A mother's character and actions shape her child, and our lives shape others.

Judges 13:15 · Darby

And Manoah said to the Angel of Jehovah, I pray thee, let us detain thee, and we will make ready a kid of the goats for thee.

Manoah has just heard the promise of a son repeated, and his response is to keep his visitor a little longer over a meal. He still thinks his guest is only a man of God, and the reply he gets changes everything he planned.

A guest treated as an equal

Manoah's offer of food comes from real piety, but it misreads who is standing in front of him. The instructions Manoah wanted repeated concerned Nazariteship — the life of someone set apart for God. One writer follows what he does when the messenger returns:

When he comes, notice how anxious Manoah is to hear all about it over again. He learns no more than his wife had already heard — simple instructions about Nazariteship. Then he bustles about to do something religious. There has to be a feast. He is going to bring this messenger, though he calls him a man of God, rather down to his own level. He will share his hospitality with him. He also wants to know his guest's name, so that he may honour him once all these things come true.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Not bread, but a burnt offering

The reply in the next verse turns the young goat from a dinner into a sacrifice. The reason lies in who the visitor is:

Manoah was clearly a God-fearing man, and he wanted to prepare a meal for the Angel. But the Angel told him He would not eat his food; yet if he wanted to offer a burnt offering, he must offer it to the Lord (vv. 15-16). The Angel was the Lord Himself, but Manoah did not know this. No one may bring an offering to a mere man or a mere angel.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The refusal is not a rebuff. It moves Manoah out of the role of host into something higher:

So far Manoah recognizes only a human messenger, even while he recognizes the message. The angel simply insists on obedience to the word already given. When Manoah wants to entertain him, the angel will take nothing from him as a man. Instead the angel tells him to offer a burnt offering to Jehovah. Like Gideon, this makes Manoah a priest to the Lord. God rebukes the believer's unbelief by bringing him into closer intimacy. He turns him from man to God, and puts him in a place where he may approach as a priest.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why it had to be a burnt offering

The particular offering matters. Manoah wanted to give his visitor a share of the meal. The burnt offering gives man no share at all:

In this offering of Manoah and his wife we see the burnt offering. It is Christ in all His blessed perfection — wholly burnt, a sweet savour to God (Leviticus 1). The burnt offering was all for God; no man could eat any of it. But along with it God provided a grain offering (vv. 19, 23), and the priest could eat from that.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The table exchanged for the rock

Manoah lays the young goat not on his own table but on a rock. The change of place carries its own lesson:

Manoah meant this as a simple act of hospitality, no doubt with a religious character. Now it becomes a sacrifice, to be placed on the rock. That rock reminds us of the Rock of ages, the only Rock, the one firm thing in a world as weak and unstable as water. It is on the Rock, Christ Jesus. The feast is not spread on Manoah's table. It is placed on the enduring Rock. That is the only basis of relationship, and the only basis of power for anyone who is to be a Nazarite and a witness for God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Knowledge comes after the sacrifice

Manoah asked for a name and for more instruction. He got neither until he had made the offering. Another writer sees this order as deliberate:

The starting point of these truths is the sacrifice. Manoah was more intelligent than Gideon (compare Judges 6:19). He took the kid with the grain offering and offered them on a rock to Jehovah. The cross is the foundation of all our knowledge as children of God. Manoah wanted to know many things which Jehovah could not reveal to him before the sacrifice.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Offer. Manoah's instinct is generous but mistaken. He treats his visitor as a man of God on his own level, and prepares a meal for Him.

- Refusal. The Angel will not eat. An offering belongs to the Lord alone, never to a man or an angel.

- Redirection. Manoah loses the role of host and gains a better one. God turns him from man to God and gives him a priest's place of approach.

- Rock. The meal moves from his table to the rock. Hospitality becomes a burnt offering — wholly God's, with nothing kept back for man.

- Revelation. The answers come only after the sacrifice. The offering is the foundation of all Manoah wanted to know.

Judges 13:16 · Darby

And the Angel of Jehovah said to Manoah, Though thou shouldest detain me, I will not eat of thy bread; and if thou wilt offer a burnt-offering, thou shalt offer it up to Jehovah. For Manoah knew not that he was the Angel of Jehovah.

Manoah wants to keep his visitor longer and set food before Him, because he does not know who stands in front of him. The answer redirects everything: no meal, and the offering must go to the LORD.

The refusal of a meal

Manoah's instinct was generous, and it was religious. But he was treating his guest as an equal — a good man to be thanked and fed.

When he comes you notice Manoah is very anxious to know all about it over again. He gets no more than his wife had got before, simple instructions about Nazariteship. Then he bustles about to do something religious. There has to be a feast. He is going to bring this messenger, though he calls him a man of God, onto his own level. He will share his hospitality. He wants to know the name of his guest, so that he may honour him after all this comes true.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The refusal was not rudeness. It guarded a line that must never be crossed.

Manoah was clearly a God-fearing man, and he wanted to prepare a meal for the Angel. But the Angel told him He would not eat his food, yet if he wanted to offer a burnt offering he must offer it to the LORD. The Angel was the Lord Himself, but Manoah did not know this, and an offering must not be made to a mere man nor a mere angel.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Turned from man to God

The correction did more than stop Manoah. It moved him nearer to God than he had aimed.

Manoah as yet recognises only a human messenger, even while recognising the message. The angel insists only on obedience to the word already given. When Manoah wants to entertain Him, He will not accept anything from him as a man. He tells him instead to offer a burnt offering to Jehovah. Like Gideon, Manoah is made a priest to the Lord in this way. God rebukes the believer's unbelief by bringing him into closer intimacy. He turns him from man to God, and puts him in a place where he may approach God as a priest.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

From a table to an altar

The offering named here explains why the meal was refused.

This offering of Manoah and his wife sets the burnt offering before us. It is Christ in all His blessed perfection, wholly burnt, a sweet savour to God (Leviticus 1). The burnt offering was all for God, and no one could eat any of it. But along with it God provided a grain offering (vv. 19, 23), and the priest might eat of that.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

And the place the food ended up was not the one Manoah had in mind.

Manoah meant it as a simple act of hospitality, religious no doubt. Now it becomes a sacrifice to lay on the rock. That rock reminds us of the Rock of ages, the only Rock, the only firm thing in a world as weak and unstable as water... It is on the Rock Christ Jesus. That is the only basis of communion with God. So the feast is not spread on Manoah's table. It is laid on the enduring Rock, the only basis of relationship, and the only basis of power for anyone who is to be a Nazarite and a witness for God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The One Manoah did not recognise

The verse ends by telling us Manoah was in the dark. Commentators see the Son of God Himself in this visitor. Their proof is what He did with the sacrifice.

Who but the Son of God would have dared to identify Himself with the burnt offering, rising to God in its smoke and fragrance? This name "Secret" (pahlah) (v. 18) identifies Him with the Son, who was to be called "Wonderful" (pahlah) (Isaiah 9:6). As John found, it is a serious error to mistake an angel for the Lord (Revelation 19:10; 22:9). It is far worse to mistake the Son of God for an angel!

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

Summary

- Refused. The visitor would not eat Manoah's bread. An offering may go to no one but the LORD — not to a man, not to an angel.

- Redirected. The visitor turned Manoah's hospitality from man to God, and drew him nearer — into a priest's place before God.

- Replaced. The intended meal became a sacrifice: a burnt offering is wholly for God, with none of it eaten by man.

- Relocated. The food went onto the rock, not onto Manoah's table. Christ is the only firm basis of relationship with God in an unstable world.

- Revealed. Manoah did not know who stood there. The One who rises to God in the flame of the offering bears the name "Wonderful" — never to be mistaken for an angel.

Judges 13:17 · Darby

And Manoah said to the Angel of Jehovah, What is thy name, that when thy word cometh to pass we may do thee honour?

Manoah has just heard the promise of a son repeated. Now he asks the visitor for a name, so he can pay him honour once the promise comes true. He means well. But the name he asks for belongs to someone he has not yet recognised.

What Manoah Was Asking

Manoah treats his visitor as a guest to be repaid, and the name is part of the repayment plan.

Then he bustles about to do something of a religious character. There has to be a feast. He is going to bring this messenger, though he calls him a man of God, rather on a level with himself. He will share his hospitality, and he wants to know the name of his guest, so that he may honour him after all these things have been fulfilled.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The problem is not the wish to honour, but where the honour is aimed.

However, Manoah wanted to know this man's name so that he could honour him after his word came to pass (v.17). So Manoah's thoughts were too much on the messenger, not on the Lord.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Recognising The Message Without Recognising The Speaker

Manoah believed the message. He had not grasped who was speaking it, so the angel turned him from entertaining a guest to offering a sacrifice.

Manoah so far recognises only a human messenger, even while he recognises the message... When Manoah wants to entertain him, the angel refuses to receive anything from him as man, and tells him to offer a burnt offering to Jehovah instead... That turns him from man to God, and gives him a place where he may approach God as a priest does. But Manoah still cannot understand, and wants to learn the name of the speaker, so that when his word comes true they may honour him as they would a man. So the angel asks why he should ask after His name — and then adds something that might well justify the question: that it was "Wonderful," a name which Isaiah later gives us as Immanuel's (Isa. 9:6). And here, indeed, God and man are brought together in one Person.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A Name Beyond Grasping

The answer turns his question back on him. The Hebrew word behind it is also a name given to the promised Child in Isaiah's prophecy.

One of the names given to this Child is "Wonderful" [Hebrew pele, meaning something not to be grasped or understood]. The same word is used when the Angel of Jehovah (in this case clearly the Lord Himself) appeared to Manoah and his wife, prophesying the birth of a son.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

This is not a dodge. And the same name in Isaiah settles who the visitor was.

Judges 13:18, "a secret," rather "wonderful," as in the margin. He does not conceal His name. See Isaiah 9:6, "His name shall be called Wonderful." So the One who appeared to Manoah was Jehovah Jesus.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Answer At The Altar

Manoah gets his answer in a different order than he expected. The sacrifice comes first, then sight.

The starting point of these truths is the sacrifice... The cross is the foundation of all our knowledge as children of God. Manoah wanted to know many things which Jehovah could not reveal to him before the sacrifice. But once this foundation was laid, the angel did wondrously.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

They gained more than a name that day.

There was no need for them to ask further about the Name of the One who is Wonderful, for He made known to them who He was. What divine secrets were theirs that day — secrets to sustain them in the difficult days in which they lived.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why The Name Points To Christ

Manoah's promised son is to be a Nazirite — someone set apart to God by a vow. The hidden name points past that child to another.

It is as though the messenger simply points away from the outward Nazirite separation he had been telling them about. He points to One — not himself, the messenger of God, but One who is the "Wonderful, the Counsellor, the Mighty God, the Father of eternity, the Prince of Peace," as Isaiah says in his ninth chapter. He puts Christ before them, and then, as though to emphasise it further, disappears in the sacrifice.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Asking. Manoah meant well. But he aimed the honour at the messenger, not at the Lord, and treated Him as a guest on his own level.

- Withheld. The reply is no refusal. He names Himself "Wonderful" — a word for what cannot be grasped or understood.

- Named. Isaiah gives that same name to the promised Child. So commentators identify the visitor as Christ Himself.

- Shown. Talk could not give what the altar gave. Jehovah could reveal nothing to Manoah before the sacrifice.

- Pointed. The hidden name turns their eyes off outward separation and onto Christ. Once He makes Himself known, the question needs no answer.

Judges 13:18 · Darby

And the Angel of Jehovah said to him, How is it that thou askest after my name, seeing it is wonderful?

Manoah asked the visitor's name so he could honour Him once the promised son arrived. The answer gave him no name, and that refusal became the clearest sign of who was standing there.

A name too great to grasp

Older English Bibles rendered the word "secret," with "wonderful" in the margin. Writers who compared the two readings saw a disclosure, not a refusal — and a link to a well-known prophecy:

Judges 13:18, "a secret," rather "wonderful," so the margin. He does not conceal His name. See Isaiah 9:6, "His name shall be called Wonderful." So the One who appeared to Manoah was Jehovah Jesus.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The word itself means more than astonishment:

In English letters the Hebrew word is "Pehleh." It carries the idea of a riddle, a mystery no one can explain. It goes beyond anything the mind can work out, let alone put into words. His humanity cannot be searched out except through revelation. He is the miraculous entry of the eternal hand of God into time! The same word occurs in Scripture where the Angel of the Lord announced the birth of Samson to Manoah and his wife.

Modernised from Scripture QuarterlyOriginal wording

Where Manoah's attention had drifted

Manoah asked so he could honour the messenger later. One writer reads the reply as a correction:

However, Manoah wanted to know this man's name so that he could honour him after his word came to pass (v. 17). So Manoah's thoughts were too much on the messenger, not on the Lord. That is why the Angel asked him why he enquired about His name, seeing it is wonderful (v. 18). In other words, His name was above Manoah's understanding, a name to cause him to wonder.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Revelation follows the sacrifice

What Manoah could not learn by asking, he learned by offering:

The starting point of these truths is the sacrifice. Manoah took the young goat with the grain offering and offered them on a rock to Jehovah. The cross is the foundation of all our knowledge as children of God. Manoah wanted to know many things that Jehovah could not reveal to him before the sacrifice. But once this foundation was laid, the angel did a wonderful thing… They found in the fire of the sacrifice a new way, not opened before. It was a way for the representative of Jehovah to go up to Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The flame then showed who the visitor was:

As the flame of the sacrifice burned, the Angel of the Lord went up in the flame (vv. 19-20). What a demonstration to Manoah and his wife that this Visitor was no less than the Lord Himself! The Lord Jesus is the true burnt offering, the one that goes up in fire to God. So this visit is an Old Testament appearing of the Lord Jesus, before the time He actually became man.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Past the Nazirite to the Wonderful One

The chapter has been about a boy set apart to God from birth — a Nazirite, whose vows included never cutting his hair. One writer sees the hidden name lifting the parents' eyes past that boy:

Is it not significant that the very name the messenger hides from him suggests the Name above every name? He does not say, "My name is secret," but "seeing it is wonderful." Does it not point to the very thing we have been saying about being a Nazirite? "His name shall be called Wonderful." Whose name? The name of the only Nazirite who ever lived… He puts Christ before them. Then, as if to stress it further, He disappears in the sacrifice.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Withheld then, spoken now

Jacob had asked the same question long before, on the night he wrestled at the brook. The answer to Manoah goes further:

No doubt the mysterious wrestler was Christ — Jehovah — and while He would not tell His name… yet He blessed Jacob. A little later the angel foretold the birth of Samson to Manoah and his wife… The truth comes out more fully than in Genesis. "Wonderful" is just the word for Christ.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Why the delay? One writer answers it in the plainest terms:

The full revelation waited for the right time, when God would be manifested in flesh. It needs no explanation. It is plain enough to an ordinary mind. If the Lord Himself was to be fully made known to men, He had to come as Man. This He did. "The Word," who "was God, … became flesh and dwelt among us." Had He come in angelic or any other form, men could not have understood.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — Manoah asked for a name so he could honour the messenger; commentators say his thoughts were on the messenger, not on the Lord.

- Word — The Hebrew behind "secret" or "wonderful" means a riddle no one can explain. Isaiah gives the same name: "His name shall be called Wonderful."

- Sacrifice — Before the offering, Jehovah could not tell Manoah what he asked. After it, the Angel went up in the flame. The cross is the foundation of all our knowledge as children of God.

- Person — The hidden name points past the Nazirite boy to the only Nazirite who ever lived, whose name is Wonderful.

- Revelation — The full answer waited until God came as Man. Had He come in any other form, men could not have understood.

Judges 13:19 · Darby

Then Manoah took the kid and the oblation, and offered it up to Jehovah upon the rock. And he did wondrously, and Manoah and his wife looked on.

Manoah has just asked his visitor for a name and heard the answer "Wonderful." The meal he planned now becomes a sacrifice, and the guest who would not eat acts out that name while the couple watch.

From meal to sacrifice

Manoah's first instinct was to feed his guest. The Angel turned that aside: such a gift belongs to God alone.

Manoah was clearly a God-fearing man, and he wanted to prepare a meal for the Angel. But the Angel told him He would not eat of his food, yet if he wanted to offer a burnt offering he must offer it to the Lord (vv. 15-16). The Angel was the Lord Himself, but Manoah did not know this, and an offering must not be made to a mere man nor to a mere angel.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The rock that became an altar

The food goes on bare stone instead of a table. Commentators see in that rock a picture of the one foundation for drawing near to God.

Manoah meant it as a simple act of hospitality, no doubt with a religious character to it. Now it becomes a sacrifice to be put on the rock. That rock reminds us of the Rock of ages, of the only Rock, the only thing firm in a world as weak and unstable as water... It is on the Rock Christ Jesus. That is the only basis of communion with God. The feast is not spread on Manoah's table. It is put on the lasting Rock — the only basis of relationship, and the only basis of power, for anyone who is to be a Nazirite and a witness for God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Nazirite was someone set apart to God by a special vow — Samson, the son promised here, was one from birth. And the stone Manoah used was not rejected as unofficial:

The rock on which they placed their offerings is accepted as an altar by the Lord.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Two offerings, two portions

Manoah brings two gifts. Older translations call the second a "meat offering"; the ESV calls it a grain offering. Each one does something different:

The burnt offering is before us in this offering of Manoah and his wife. It is Christ in all His blessed perfection, wholly burnt, a sweet savour to God (Leviticus 1). The burnt offering was all for God; none of it could be eaten by man. But along with it we find God provided a grain offering (vv. 19, 23), and of this the priest might eat.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The same writer shows what that second gift means for the worshipper.

God has called us in to share, in our measure, in His own delight in Christ and His work. There is a grain offering. He has given to the believer that same blessed Christ to be the continual food of his soul.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The visitor acts out His name

Manoah was told the name was "Wonderful," and the next thing recorded is wonderful action. The name and the deed match.

The messenger acts according to the name He has given... He is that wondrous Stranger who came again and again in the Old Testament, with His face veiled and His identity hidden. Yet He gave enough hints to remind us that Jehovah and the angel of the Old Testament is, after all, our Jesus, who is Jehovah the Saviour... It is as if He would say to this lowly, weak, helpless couple: if you are to be true Nazirites, you must follow Me by faith where I am. You must see Me as I am, first identified with the Rock, as the altar.

after fix reason placeholder This shows us the Person of Christ. Then the sacrifice upon it... speaks of the work of Christ.

Samuel Ridout

Sacrifice first, then understanding

Manoah's questions went unanswered until he had offered. The wonder came after the sacrifice.

The starting point of these truths is the sacrifice... The cross is the foundation of all our knowledge as children of God. Manoah wanted to know many things which the Lord could not reveal to him before the sacrifice. But once this foundation was laid, the angel did wonderfully.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Worship away from the appointed place

This offering happens on a rock, not at God's appointed place of worship. Writers count it, with two other cases, as true worship even so.

Manoah turns what he had supposed to be a meal into a sacrifice, because the Lord had revealed His wish that it should be so (Judges 13:15, 19)... All three were cases of true worship, even though they clearly departed from God's own established worship.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Redirected. The Angel refused the food as a meal and took it as a sacrifice. An offering belongs to God alone.

- Rock. The altar was bare stone — Christ as the one firm basis of communion, relationship and power.

- Twofold. The burnt offering went up wholly to God. The grain offering gave the worshipper a share in what delights Him.

- Wonderful. The act of verse 19 proves the name given in verse 18 — the veiled visitor is the Lord Himself.

- Order. The sacrifice came first, the revelation after. The cross is the foundation of all a believer learns later.

Judges 13:20 · Darby

And it came to pass, as the flame went up from off the altar towards the heavens, that the Angel of Jehovah ascended in the flame of the altar; and Manoah and his wife looked on, and fell on their faces to the ground.

Manoah had asked the stranger's name and got no answer. Instead he got a sight: the flame of his own offering carried the visitor up to heaven, and that sight told him who the stranger was.

Who Went Up in the Flame

This visitor was no created messenger. No servant of God would take the place of the sacrifice:

Only the Son of God would have dared to identify Himself with the burnt offering, going up to God in its smoke and fragrance. The name "Secret" (pahlah) in verse 18 links Him with the Son who would be called "Wonderful" (pahlah) in Isaiah 9:6. It is a serious error, as John found, to mistake an angel for the Lord; but much more to mistake the Son of God for an angel!

Modernised from VariousOriginal wording

Real angels act differently. Gabriel stood at an altar in the temple, and he did nothing of the kind:

Gabriel the messenger stands at the altar, but he will not go up in the flame of the altar, as the angel-Jehovah did long ago (Judges 13:20). He stands in the temple, but he will not speak of himself as greater than the temple, as Jesus-Jehovah did later. He fills his place as a servant, and takes no higher.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Nothing Revealed Before the Sacrifice

The order of the chapter matters. The offering comes first; only then does heaven open:

The cross is the foundation of all our knowledge as children of God. Manoah wanted to know many things which Jehovah could not reveal to him before the sacrifice. But with that foundation in place, the angel did wonderfully... In the fire of the sacrifice they found a new way, never opened before — a way for the representative of Jehovah to go up to Him. Their gaze was fixed on the angel, and they saw a glorious person. Only when he had disappeared from before their eyes did they know where his home was.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Rock, the Offering, and the One on High

The scene has three parts, and each one says something about Christ:

You must see Me as I am, first of all identified with the Rock, as the altar. This shows us the Person of Christ. Then the sacrifice on it... speaks of the work of Christ. So as He goes up in the smoke of the sacrifice, He says to them, in effect: You must identify Me with One on high. He has linked you with His sacrifice and the Rock.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Watching: What the Fire Says

The couple did nothing but watch; older translations read "looked on." One writer explains what the fire meant:

The fire is judgment. But what need was there of the judgment of God on Him? Though the burnt offering shows Christ in all His absolute perfection, the fire proclaims that He took the place of judgment. The sin and the sinner needed this, and the holiness of God demanded it. But then God has accepted that work. Yes, He finds His delight in it.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Nobody can measure what that offering is worth to God — but watching is within reach of anyone:

Can you fathom what that blessed Christ is to God — the burnt-offering? No, you cannot; but you can do what Manoah and his wife did. You can "look on" and see what God's estimate is... And note that it is God's WISH for me to be occupied in this way. It will be the theme of eternal occupation in heaven, and if so it is fitting that it should be my theme on earth.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Faces to the Ground

What they saw drove them to the ground. The same sight should still do that in us, and more deeply, because God has shown us more:

This wonderful act revealed something else, not for Manoah, but for us: the separation to God that the angel had spoken about is now heavenly in character. The angel, in parting from them, went up into heaven... Set apart in heaven, He draws us after Himself and fixes our eyes on Himself. His purpose is that the heavenly character of the One whom the world has rejected may be reproduced in us here below. Manoah and his wife had only a faint glimpse of this revelation, though it teaches us much. They "fell on their faces to the ground." Darkness is increasing. Shall we not adore in fuller measure the God who has revealed to us not only a heavenly and glorified Christ, but our place in Him?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Sacrifice first. Manoah got no answers until the offering lay on the rock. The cross is the foundation of everything God shows His children.

- Fire. The flame that burned up the offering is judgment. God's holiness demanded it, and God has accepted the work and delights in it.

- The Person. No servant would take the place of the burnt offering. The One who rose in its flame bears the name Wonderful of Isaiah 9:6.

- A way up. In that fire they saw a road not opened before, and a Person now at the end of it, linked to them by His sacrifice.

- Watching and worship. They could not measure the offering, but they could look on and fall on their faces. That is still the believer's occupation, on earth and in heaven.

Judges 13:21 · Darby

And the Angel of Jehovah appeared no more to Manoah and to his wife. Then Manoah knew that it was the Angel of Jehovah.

Manoah and his wife watched their visitor vanish upward in the flame of their own sacrifice. Only then did they know who He was — and commentators ask why God let them see it so late.

Why understanding came last

Manoah had asked a string of questions and received almost nothing. One writer traces the change to what Manoah did next — He offered a sacrifice on a rock, and the recognition grew out of that act.

The starting point of these truths is the sacrifice. Manoah, more intelligent than Gideon, took the kid with the grain offering and offered them on a rock to the Lord. The cross is the foundation of all our knowledge as children of God. Manoah wanted to know many things which the Lord could not reveal to him before the sacrifice. But with this foundation in place, the angel did a wonderful thing… Their gaze fixed on the angel, they saw a glorious person. Once he had disappeared from their sight, they knew where his home was.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer points to what God asked of them first. When Manoah asked what to do with the child, the answer only repeated the rules of separation given to his wife.

Because knowledge is not the first thing that God requires. Neither knowledge nor even true devotion to God, such as Manoah and his wife had, is enough to keep us while everything is in ruins. What they needed before knowledge was true personal separation to God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Who the visitor was

The proof came in the way He left. After that, He never appeared to them again.

As the flame of the sacrifice burned brightly, the Angel of the Lord ascended in the flame. What a demonstration to Manoah and his wife that this Visitor was no less than the Lord Himself! The Lord Jesus is the true burnt offering, that which ascends in fire to God. So this visit is one of the theophanies of Scripture. That is, the Lord Jesus appeared in Old Testament times, before He actually became man. No one can say what body He came in, or whether it was a solid physical body. But each appearing was temporary.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A name above understanding

Manoah had earlier asked for a name and never got one. That silence now looks deliberate.

Manoah wanted to know this man's name so that he could honour him after his word came to pass. So Manoah's thoughts were too much on the messenger, not on the Lord. The Angel asked why he wanted to know His name, since that name is wonderful. In other words, His name was above Manoah's understanding, a name to cause him to wonder.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer looks at how Scripture shows the Lord, and finds only one word fits.

Think of the Lord in the Old Testament appearings of Christ, or as living in the unapproachable light that no one has seen or can see. The only fitting thing to say is "Wonderful!"

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Eyes that followed Him upward

The visitor left by going up, and the couple's hearts went with Him. Rossier draws out what that departure did to them.

At that moment the hearts and the interests of this poor, faithful few were drawn away from this world. They followed the angel, going up with him to heaven. These simple believers could from then on speak of a path that led to heaven. They could speak of a person who was there, who had become their object while they were still here below.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What recognition cost them

Knowing brought no relief at first. Manoah's first reaction was fear. One writer sees his reasoning as sound, as far as it went.

Verse 21 tells us that Manoah realized they had seen the Angel of the Lord. He rightly concludes that this was God, and he was afraid they would die because they had seen God. For God had said to Moses, "Man shall not see me and live." However, this was not a full revelation of God, but only partial.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Sacrifice first. The sacrifice on the rock came before the recognition. The cross is the foundation of what believers know of God.

- Separation first. God asked this couple for a separated life before He answered their questions. Knowledge is not what He asks for first.

- Ascent reveals. He left as the burnt offering leaves, rising in the flame. That showed them He was the Lord Himself.

- Name withheld. The Angel gave no name, because His name was above Manoah's understanding — a name meant to make him wonder.

- Gaze redirected. Once He vanished, they had a path to heaven and a person there — an object above, while they lived below.

Judges 13:22 · Darby

And Manoah said to his wife, We shall surely die, because we have seen God.

Manoah has just watched his visitor vanish upward in the flame of his own sacrifice. He realises he has seen God, and the discovery terrifies him. His theology is right, but his conclusion is wrong — and his wife's answer shows why.

What Manoah Got Right

Manoah's alarm was not superstition. He reasoned from words God had spoken to Moses. One commentator shows where his logic held, and where it failed:

Verse 21 tells us that Manoah realized they had seen the Angel of the Lord. He rightly concludes that this was God (v. 22). He was afraid that they would die because they had seen God! For God had said to Moses, "man shall not see me and live" (Ex. 33:20). However, this was not a full revelation of God, but only partial.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

An Old Instinct

Manoah was not the first to think this way. The same fear appears all through Scripture when God draws near. It also shows how a person truly comes to know himself:

It was the common judgment of all those who, in old times, feared God, that they could not see Him and live. They had carried that conscience with them ever since Adam retreated from the presence of God among the trees of the garden. Manoah judged that he must die because he had seen God. Gideon expected the same. Ezekiel fell on his face, and Daniel's healthy appearance turned to ruin when they came into contact with the glory. Isaiah learned the uncleanness of his lips when he saw the King, the Lord of hosts. This was truly learning themselves — not by themselves or among themselves, but by God.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Wife's Reply

His wife answers his dread with two facts. God accepted their offering, and God gave them a promise. One writer sets her faith against his fear:

He reasoned in his ignorance of God, but his wife did not. She knew better, and she answered his fears by her faith... Happy woman! She could speak of an accepted sacrifice and a spoken word. She knew that the God who had accepted the one and spoken the other had thoughts of good towards them, not of evil... These devout people of Dan had brought their offering. She had no doubt that the Lord had accepted it from their hand. And because of that offering He had accepted them too, according to His word.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Another writer names the love behind her answer. A love already proved settles every smaller fear:

Like so many Christians today, Manoah was filled with fear when he found himself in the presence of God. "He said to his wife, we shall surely die, for we have seen God" (v. 22). His companion was a true helper for him. Is there any room for fear, she said, when God has accepted our offering? The love of God, proved to us at the cross, is the positive guarantee of everything else. "He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things?" (Rom. 8:32)

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the Sacrifice Came First

Manoah wanted answers, but they did not come until he had offered his sacrifice. That order matters:

The starting point of these truths is the sacrifice... The cross is the foundation of all our knowledge as children of God. Manoah wanted to know many things which the Lord could not reveal to him before the sacrifice. But with that foundation in place, the angel did wondrously... In the fire of the sacrifice they found a new way, never opened before. It was a way for the representative of the Lord to go up to Him. Their eyes stayed fixed on the angel, and they saw a glorious person. They now knew where he lived, because he had disappeared from their sight.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"Wonderful" — And We Live

Manoah heard that God's name is Wonderful, and it made him certain he would die. For us the outcome is the opposite:

Manoah, having heard that the name of God was Wonderful, said, "We shall surely die," Judges 13:22. In our day we also have seen that His name is Wonderful, but we live!

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

What she had in a shadow, we have in full — and the same two grounds still carry the weight:

We can speak of an accepted sacrifice and a spoken word, and we have full assurance that God will deny neither. He will honour the sacrifice and fulfil His word, for both matter infinitely to Him and to us. He is revealed in both, and having seen Him by faith so revealed, we shall not die but live, and live above the circumstances that threaten to crush us now.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight. Manoah was right that he had seen God. He was right that no one can see God and live. But what he saw was a partial revelation, not a full one.

- Fear. Fear in God's presence is an old instinct of conscience, going back to Adam. It is also how people have always learned who they are — by God, not by measuring themselves against each other.

- Sacrifice. God had already accepted their offering. A God who receives your sacrifice is not about to kill you.

- Word. Her faith held two things together — an accepted sacrifice and a spoken promise. Both proved that God's thoughts toward them were good.

- Life. We have seen for ourselves that His name is Wonderful. Manoah expected to die for it; we live.

Judges 13:23 · Darby

But his wife said to him, If Jehovah were pleased to kill us, he would not have received a burnt-offering and an oblation at our hands, neither would he have shewed us all these things, nor would he at this time have told us [such things] as these.

Manoah had just seen the angel of the LORD go up in the flame from the altar. He was sure that seeing God meant death. His wife answered his fear with a simple argument built on what God had already done.

Fear Met by Faith

She points to two facts her husband cannot deny: God received a sacrifice, and God spoke. One writer traces her confidence back to the law of the burnt offering, where God said what acceptance would mean for the person who brought it:

Happy woman, she could speak of an accepted sacrifice and a spoken word. She knew that the God who had accepted the one and spoken the other had thoughts of good and not of evil towards them. She must have known how the Lord had spoken to Moses. He said, "When any one of you brings an offering to the LORD … he shall lay his hand on the head of the burnt offering, and it shall be accepted for him to make atonement for him" (Lev. 1). These devout people of the tribe of Dan had brought their offering. She had no doubt that the Lord had accepted it from their hand, and had accepted them because of it according to His word.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The Simplicity of Her Reasoning

Her argument has no complicated steps. One writer sees that plainness as the mark of faith itself:

It is still the woman who enters into the mind of God. … Her reasoning is simplicity itself, and its truth proves itself. Faith is always simple. Unbelief is hard work and goes the long way round, for it is the effort of human will against God — and hard work it must be.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What the Two Offerings Were

She names two gifts God received: a burnt offering and a grain offering — Older translations call the second the "meat offering." The two were not handled in the same way:

This offering of Manoah and his wife sets the burnt offering before us — Christ in all His blessed perfection, wholly burnt, a pleasing aroma to God (Leviticus 1). The burnt offering was all for God; none of it could be eaten by man. But along with it we find God provided a grain offering (vv. 19, 23), and of this the priest might eat.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Acceptance as the Guarantee of Everything Else

If God has accepted the greater gift, the smaller mercies follow. One writer carries that logic into the New Testament:

Like so many Christians today, Manoah was filled with fear when he found himself in the presence of God. He said to his wife, "We shall surely die, for we have seen God" (v. 22). His companion was a true helper to him. Is there any room for fear, she said, when God has accepted our offering? The love of God, proved to us at the cross, is the positive guarantee for everything else. "He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things?" (Rom. 8:32)

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Two Views of Her Faith

Commentators differ on how far her insight reached. One reads her answer as unusual spiritual perception:

Like Gideon, Manoah thought he would die at seeing the angel of the Lord. But his wife shows remarkable intelligence. She says that the acceptance of their offerings, and the good news from the angel, clearly showed that the Lord would not kill them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another grants her faith but measures it against Hannah, the mother of Samuel:

This was simple, straightforward logic. She was without doubt a believer, but she does not appear to have the same spiritual exercise as Hannah did (1 Sam. 2:1-10).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Same Argument, Still Unanswerable

Her argument was not left behind in her own story. God's delight in being near us and His delight in showing mercy cannot be pulled apart:

How completely may we trust Him for the forgiveness of our sins, and for our blessings in grace! He would not delight in fellowship with us, and in His nearness to us, if He did not also delight in two things: the mercy He has shown us, and our believing, ready and assured acceptance of peace at His hand in Jesus. The reasoning of Manoah's wife with her husband applies to this — and there is sweet comfort in that artless but unanswerable argument of faith.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Accepted. God took their burnt offering, which was all for Him, and a grain offering, of which the priest might eat.

- Accepted, therefore spoken. The God who took the sacrifice also spoke; she rested her whole answer on both.

- Accepted, therefore simple. Her reasoning is plain and proves itself; unbelief is the hard, roundabout road.

- Accepted, therefore guaranteed. Love proved at the cross settles everything smaller: He who gave His own Son will not withhold the rest.

- Accepted, therefore unafraid. Manoah expected death; his wife saw a God with thoughts of good and not of evil towards them.

Judges 13:24 · Darby

And the woman bore a son, and called his name Samson. And the child grew, and Jehovah blessed him.

A woman who had no children bears a son and names him Samson. The verse then adds only two notes about the years that follow: he grew, and God blessed him. It is the brightest moment in a life that later collapses. So what does God's blessing on a child guarantee?

A birth of God's choosing

No one earned this birth or asked for it. One writer traces the whole account back to God's free choice, down to the tribe involved.

In the case of Samson we see how everything shows God's hand working in sovereignty. He chooses the already dishonoured tribe of Dan — the first in Israel to fall into idolatry (Judges 18). He can do as it pleases Him. Unasked, the Lord appeared to Manoah's wife and announced the birth — to her who had been childless until then — of this child.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

The name she gave him

Commentators differ over what "Samson" means. Each reading points to a different centre for his story.

The name has more than one explanation. "Sun-like" is the simplest reading from the root of the word, and Deborah's song gives it some support (Judges 5:31). Yet Josephus explains it as "strong," and that seems to point more to the lesson of his story. The secret of strength shows itself in him, both in his victories and in his failure and defeat.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Another writer keeps the "sun-like" reading and ties the name to how far Samson's work could go.

He would only start the work — for he was not Christ! He might "begin" the work: the true David alone could finish it. It is worth noting here that his name Samson means "Sun-like" — from Shemesh, the "Sun" of Righteousness Himself.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Blessed because Israel was so far gone

The blessing on this child was not a sign that things were going well in Israel. It was the opposite. The deliverer God raised up shows how far the nation had fallen.

In this case the state of the people was such that God sets him apart to Himself as a Nazirite. There could be no stronger proof that the people as a whole were far from God. In all ordinary cases a Nazirite was someone who had taken a special vow of separation to God, but only for a short time. In this case it was an extraordinary Nazirite vow, stretching through his whole life.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A short bright start

Read the chapter and you notice how little space this happy period gets. One writer sets that proportion beside the opening years of the church.

Samson grew, the LORD blessed him, and the Spirit of the LORD began to stir him. The book of Acts shows the same features of growth (Acts 6:7), blessing (Acts 4:32-33) and the moving of the Holy Spirit (Acts 9:31). Yet Judges says very little about this period of Samson's life, compared with the detail it gives about his failure. In the same way, the church's early days were very brief compared with the centuries of failure that followed.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Blessing is not the same as obedience

God's blessing rested on the growing boy. It did not settle how he would live.

God was working with him, but we do not see in Samson a serious concern to let the Word of God guide him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One writer makes that gap the frame for the whole life.

There are two distinct things: what God intended Samson to be, and what he was. These are two very different things. The history of Samson as he was gives us plenty of material for warning. But the history of Samson as God intended him to be shows us who and what alone can deliver God's people from the power of the Philistines — from the power of a religion that is only outward.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the verse offers parents

One writer lists what this home had going for it.

Here we see a child of promise, and one who gave the brightest promise. We see godly parents, and a true desire to bring their son up as he should go, "and the young man grew, and the LORD blessed him."

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

Samson later failed. One writer finds comfort even there.

This in no way excuses Samson for all his wilfulness and sin. But it does bring great comfort to an aching heart to know that it is God's prerogative to bring good out of evil… Samson's name appears in the honour lists of Hebrews 11.

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. The birth came unasked, to a childless woman, in a tribe already marked by idolatry. God chose it all.

- Named. Commentators read "Samson" as "sun-like" or as "strong". The second points to the theme that runs through his victories and his defeat alike: strength.

- Blessed. The blessing rested on a life set apart to God from birth. That lifelong separation showed how far Israel had drifted.

- Tested. Blessing came with him; obedience to God's Word did not come with it. Judges spends far more space on his fall than on his bright start.

- Remembered. What God intended Samson to be and what he became are two different histories. Yet his name still stands in the roll of faith in Hebrews 11.

Judges 13:25 · Darby

And the Spirit of Jehovah began to move him at Mahaneh-Dan, between Zoreah and Eshtaol.

Samson has been born, has grown, and God has blessed him — and now, before he has done anything at all, the Spirit begins to stir him at Mahaneh-dan. It raises two questions the rest of his story answers. What is this power? And why does it rest on a man who ends in ruin?

(The quotations below follow older translations, which read "began to move him at times," in "the camp of Dan.")

The Spirit Prepares the Instrument

God prepares a man inwardly before He uses him in public. One writer lists others made ready the same way:

Samuel was exercised in heart before he was manifested, and David likewise, and Ezra, and Nehemiah, and the rest of them, though in different ways. The Spirit of God was getting the instrument ready before the hand of God used it. As we read of Samson, "the Spirit of the Lord began to move him at times in the camp of Dan between Zorah and Eshtaol."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Power That Comes and Goes

"At times" is not a throwaway phrase. It shows how the Spirit worked then. He came for a purpose, then lifted, and did not stay:

Again it says about Samson, "The Spirit of the Lord began to move him at times" (Judges 13:25). It also says that "the Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon him" (Judges 14:6; 15:14)… The thought of the Holy Spirit abiding is never suggested in Old Testament Scripture. It was merely His coming upon a man in the character of power.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

For the Christian now, this power is not occasional:

We too may win such victories. We do not depend on a temporary action of the Holy Spirit coming on us from outside. We win because, through redemption, the Holy Spirit has sealed us, and He is the Spirit of power.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why This Man Was Set Apart

The stirring falls on a man already set apart as a Nazarite — someone separated to God by vow. One writer reads Samson's unusual case as a verdict on the nation:

In this case the state of the people was such that God sets him apart to Himself as a Nazarite. There could not be a stronger proof that the people, as a whole, were far from God. Normally a Nazarite was someone who had taken a special vow of separation to God, but only for a short time. Here it was an extraordinary Nazariteship, stretching through his whole life.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Separation is not just a rule attached to Samson. It is where his strength comes from:

Samson, as a type, sets before us the principle of Nazariteship: entire separation to God. That separation is the source of strength in conflict with our enemies. These enemies are seen as ones who seek to gain the upper hand among the people of God, within their own borders and in their own heart.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Gift Is Not Character

Power from God is no measure of the person carrying it:

Still, we cannot judge the moral worth of a man of God by the greatness of his gift. Nowhere in Scripture do we find a stronger man than Samson, nor one weaker morally… Samson was a Nazarite, and the Spirit of God often came on him. But his heart had never been judged, so his state did not match the gift he used.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Place Named

"Mahaneh-dan" is a place name, and its story comes later in the book:

In Judges 13:25 it should read, as the margin has it, "Mahaneh Dan," a place named because of what happened there, as told in Judges 18:12.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Bright Start, Briefly Told

Three things mark Samson's early years, then Scripture hurries to his collapse:

Samson grew, Jehovah blessed him, and the Spirit of Jehovah began to move him. The book of Acts shows the same features of growth (Acts 6:7), blessing (Acts 4:32-33) and the moving of the Holy Spirit (Acts 9:31). Yet very little is said about this period of Samson's life in Judges, compared with the details given about his failure.

Modernised from Greg QuailOriginal wording

God's Ways Overrule Ours

Samson's life ends in ruin, yet the purpose that starts here still arrives:

God always works out His ways, and He does it through many circumstances that are far from matching His thoughts. More than that, He uses those very circumstances to carry out His purposes — here, the deliverance of Israel by an instrument He shaped for that end… Unfaithfulness on our part does not disturb the ways of God. It was by the death of a blind Samson that Jehovah won the greatest victory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Blessed — growth, blessing and the Spirit's stirring open Samson's story. The same three marks open the church's story in Acts.

- Stirred — this is preparation, not yet public service. The Spirit made the instrument ready before God's hand used it.

- At times — the power came and went. The Spirit did not yet stay; today the Holy Spirit seals the believer.

- Separated — the stirring rests on a lifelong Nazarite. Separation to God is itself the source of strength against enemies inside the borders.

- Untested — gift never measures the man. Samson was the strongest man and the weakest in character, a heart never judged — yet his failure did not disturb God's ways.

Judges 14:1 · Darby

And Samson went down to Timnathah, and saw a woman in Timnathah of the daughters of the Philistines.

Samson was a Nazarite: a man set apart to God from birth, raised up to begin saving Israel from the Philistines. Yet the first act we read of is a walk down to a Philistine town, where a woman caught his eye.

A step in the wrong direction

The verse begins with a direction: Samson went down.

So when you read that Samson goes down, it means something. The first step he takes is a downward step. He goes down to what is claimed as "a portion" of the Philistines. Once there, he forms an alliance with his enemies. So the first step Samson took was an alliance with the enemies of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the eyes saw, and what the word had said

Samson wanted what he saw. He never weighed it against what God had said.

The desire of Samson showed that the word of God did not have its right weight with him. His parents knew much less of God's purposes than he did, but much more of His word. They said to him: "Is there not a woman among the daughters of your relatives... that you must go to take a wife from the uncircumcised Philistines?" The word of God was clear on this point: "You shall not intermarry with them... for they would turn away your sons from following me, to serve other gods" (Deut. 7:3-4). Why did Samson not pay attention to this?... In the life of Samson, three women mark the three stages which led to the loss of his Nazariteship. The first pleased his eyes; he formed a passing connection with the second (Judges 16:1), and he loved the third (Judges 16:4).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

One look is never a small thing.

This tendency to look for what "pleases the eyes" in the world led Samson into endless trouble. Only the power of God could rescue him. Scripture shows many believers whose first look toward the world brought trouble they could not undo. We have to watch against that with fear and trembling, for we can never predict what pit a single desire may open for us.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"Right in my eyes"

His parents object. Samson answers with a preference, not a reason.

Samson asked his parents to get the woman for him as a wife (v. 2). They knew how inconsistent this was, and protested that he ought at least to find an Israelite wife. Samson did not even defend himself in this, but answered, "Get her for me, for she is right in my eyes" (v. 3). He showed no sign of seeking God's will in finding a wife, but relied only on his personal feelings.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Linked to the enemy he was sent to fight

One step decides the shape of everything that comes after.

All the events spring out of Samson's attempt to connect himself with the very people from whom he is to "begin to save" Israel. That is a sad sign of how his story ends. The alliance is what brings on the conflict. The Philistine and the Nazarite cannot really unite, and trying to do so only shows how far apart they are by nature.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The damage is not only Samson's. The same test falls on us.

But here is a man whose testimony is to be one of separation, and the first thing he does is to link himself with the enemy... A man who can take a Philistine to his heart cannot be an uncompromising witness against them. Let us apply this to our own relationship with this world. Who can take the world into his heart and still bear faithful testimony against it?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Overruled, not approved

Verse 4 says this was from the LORD. What does that mean?

His marriage to the woman of Timnah was of God (Judges 14:4). That is, God used it as an occasion against the Philistines. But the act itself went against God's express command. It is a sign of the condition they were in.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Even so, God saw something real in him.

But Samson was not single-eyed; he brought a divided heart to the work. He tried to combine pleasing his own eyes with his hatred of the enemy of his people. He was holding out his left hand to the world while wanting to fight it with his right. Yet God took note of what there was for Him in this divided heart. "It was of the Lord," who could use even Samson's weaknesses to carry out His purposes of grace toward His people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Down. His first step is a step down. He heads for Philistine ground before he ever asks for a wife.

- Sight. Desire came through his eyes. One look opened a pit he could not foresee, and three women in turn cost him his separation to God.

- Self-will. His parents objected. He gave no reason back, only that she was right in his eyes.

- Alliance. The Nazarite and the Philistine cannot mix. Take the world into your heart, and you cannot witness against it.

- Overruled. God used the marriage against the Philistines. He never excused the act, which broke His plain command.

Judges 14:2 · Darby

And he went up, and told his father and his mother, and said, I have seen a woman in Timnathah of the daughters of the Philistines; and now take her for me as wife.

Samson's first recorded act as Israel's deliverer is an order to his parents: he has seen a Philistine woman and wants her as his wife. How can a man raised up to fight the Philistines ask them for a bride?

The Downward Step

Samson had already gone down to Timnah before he spoke to his parents. One writer treats that direction as a moral clue.

When you read that Samson goes down, it is suggestive. The first step that he takes is a downward step. But more than that: he went down to Timnath, and saw a woman in Timnath, of the daughters of the Philistines. He goes down to what is claimed as "a portion" of the Philistines, and in going down he makes an alliance with his enemies. So Samson's first step was an alliance with the enemies of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The drift started before he spoke a word. Another writer puts it in the heart:

In heart he had already declined from his calling, or he could not have thought of such a thing.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Sight Before Judgment

Samson's whole case is what he saw. One writer traces his later troubles back to that first look.

This tendency to seek in the world what "pleases the eyes" led Samson into endless difficulties. Only the power of God could deliver him from them. Scripture gives many examples where a first look toward the world lands the believer in trouble that cannot be repaired. We have to watch against that with fear and trembling. We can never tell beforehand what abyss a single lust may open for us. Grace can keep us, but we must not trifle with it, or imagine we can use it as a cover for our lusts or an excuse for our sins.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"Get Her for Me"

Samson knew what the Philistines were doing to Israel. It made no difference to what he wanted.

He knew the Philistines were oppressors of Israel, yet he mixed with them when it pleased him, and he attacked them when he pleased. This strange inconsistency is sometimes seen in the children of God today … He showed no evidence of seeking God's will in finding a wife, but depended only on his personal feelings.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The parents gave way. One writer says they should not have, and sees Samson in the young today:

A strong, wilful, wayward young man was Samson. We might say the parents should not have yielded so easily to his demand, "Get her for me; for she pleases me well" (Judges 14:3). And very probably this is true. Is not Samson, just here, a true picture of modern youth? "She pleases me well," or, "It pleases me well," is too often reason enough for the young (or the old) to act in many things. They quite forget the One of whom it is said, "Christ did not please Himself."

Modernised from George C. WillisOriginal wording

Older translations read "she pleases me well" in verse 3. The ESV has "she is right in my eyes."

A Witness Disarmed

Samson's calling was to stand separate from the Philistines. His first move went the other way.

Here is a man whose testimony is to be one of separation, and the first thing he does is to link himself with the enemy. He has settled the whole question of his relationship and testimony at once. A man who takes a Philistine to his heart cannot be an uncompromising witness against them. Let us apply this to our own relationship with the world. Who can take the world to his heart and still bear faithful witness against it?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Of the Lord — but Not the Marriage

Was any of this from the Lord? One writer draws a sharp line between the end God intended and the means Samson chose.

Notice! It was not the union that was of the Lord, but the intended antagonism to the Philistines — not the means, but the end. Union there could have been none. The opposite happens. When two opposed things are forced together, the recoil and the built-in differences only show up more clearly. The means Samson chose was no divine way to disarm evil forces. The intention was divine; the means were clearly human. So the marriage never takes place, and yet the intention and the divine desire are fully declared and answered.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Down. The verse opens with a descent, not a decision. Going down to Timnah was already an alliance with the enemies Samson was raised to fight.

- Seen. What began as a look became a demand. A first glance toward the world can open an abyss no one foresaw.

- Self. "She pleases me well" is his whole reason. Feeling stands in the place of God's will — unlike the One who did not please Himself.

- Silenced. A man who takes the enemy to his heart cannot testify against him. The alliance settled his witness before his work began.

- Sovereign. God's purpose against the Philistines stood. The end was His; the means were Samson's. The marriage never happened, and the purpose still did.

Judges 14:3 · Darby

And his father and his mother said to him, Is there no woman among the daughters of thy brethren, and among all my people, that thou goest to take a wife of the Philistines, the uncircumcised? And Samson said to his father, Take her for me, for she pleases me well.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Judges 14:4 · Darby

And his father and his mother did not know that it was of Jehovah, that he was seeking an occasion against the Philistines. Now at that time the Philistines were ruling over Israel.

Samson has just demanded a Philistine wife, and his parents did not know that God had a purpose running underneath it. So how can a wrong step be "from the LORD," and does that make it right?

An enemy inside the land — and the only power against it

The last line of the verse explains why Israel needed a deliverer at all.

Two things marked the time of Samson's arrival. God's people were growing more and more corrupt; and "at that time the Philistines ruled over Israel." … The Philistines were not a scourge, a punishment sent from outside. They lived in Israel's own territory, in the land of promise. So to accept their rule was to give up their own title to the land. God's favour had given them that land as an inheritance no one could take away. … One of the main lessons of Samson's life comes from these two facts. God's people may lose the truth of their calling and, through unfaithfulness, submit to the rule of the enemy. Then complete separation to God is the only way of power.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What was "from the LORD"

The phrase does not cover everything in the story. Commentators draw a careful line between the marriage itself and the collision it produced.

Notice! It was not the union that was from the LORD, but the intended opposition to the Philistines — not the means, but the end. There could have been no union at all. … The means Samson proposed was no divine way of cancelling out evil forces. The intention was divine, but the means were clearly human. So the marriage never takes place, and the intention and divine desire is fully declared and answered.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

God's purpose is no cover for our will

Some read the verse as a quiet excuse for Samson. It is not one.

Look at it in detail and you will see he has no thought of God in it. God has His thoughts in it, blessed be His name; He overrules even our follies and mistakes. … But it is one thing for God to have His purpose and quite another thing for me to be accomplishing that purpose. God will accomplish His purposes despite my disobedience. But I can never use His purposes to endorse my disobedience.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The good that followed came from somewhere other than the alliance.

Samson's marriage to a daughter of Timnath was clearly a positive sin, an open breach of the LORD's commands. The blessing the Lord gave him when the Philistines wronged him does not justify it at all. He did not find blessing in his marriage — quite the opposite.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A divided heart that God still noticed

Samson hated the enemy's rule. At the same time, he wanted his own pleasure.

Samson was not single-eyed; he brought a divided heart to the work. He tried to combine pleasing his own eyes with his hatred of his people's enemy. So he held out his left hand to the world while wanting to fight it with his right. Yet God took note of what there was for Him in this divided heart. "It was from the LORD" — He could use even Samson's weaknesses to carry out His purposes of grace towards His people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Scripture tells it without flinching

The verse tells the failure plainly and offers no apology for it.

If man had written the story, would he have dared to speak out this plainly? Without inspiration, I doubt any believer would have wanted to write that verse, or many others, as God has written them. … Now I am far from denying that it is right for us to feel the pain and shame of Samson's ways. But God's Spirit always assumes one thing — the perfect goodness and unswerving holiness of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Seeking an occasion ourselves

One part of Samson's motive is worth copying.

Mixed as Samson's motives were, "he sought an occasion" in a time of ruin. And why? To deliver Israel by striking the enemy that held them in bondage. May this motive be ours also. "Redeeming the time" (seizing opportunities), says the apostle, "because the days are evil" (Eph. 5:16). May we then, set apart to God ourselves, have hearts filled with tender pity for our brothers and sisters still in bondage under the world's yoke. May we seek an occasion, in love and the energy of the Spirit, to deliver them from it. … His desire was so intense that it found the occasion, where the lazy and indifferent, meeting an obstacle in their path, would have turned back.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Occasion needed. The Philistines ruled from inside the promised land. Israel's danger was not a scourge from outside but a master they had accepted at home.

- Occasion sovereign. What was "from the LORD" was the clash God intended, not the union Samson proposed. The end was God's, not the means — and the marriage never even took place.

- Occasion divided. Samson hated the enemy's rule and pleased his own eyes at the same time. He held out one hand to the world and fought it with the other. God still used what was for Him in that divided heart.

- Occasion no excuse. God's purpose runs on despite our disobedience. But no one may use that purpose to excuse it. The blessing came after the wrong, never out of it.

- Occasion ours. Copy Samson's one good motive. In a ruined time, look hard for the opening to free others from the world's yoke, where the indifferent would turn back.

Judges 14:5 · Darby

And Samson went down, and his father and his mother, to Timnathah; and they came to the vineyards of Timnathah. And behold, a young lion roared against him;

Samson's first act of strength happens on a road he should not have been walking. He is going down to a Philistine town to take a wife, and a young lion meets him on the way.

Going down to Timnah

Commentators take the word "down" as more than geography. One writer reads the journey as a step onto enemy ground that God still held inside His purpose:

Samson was called by God to be a true Nazarite — a man set apart to God — but in the life that was meant to display that Nazarite character he failed. "He went down to Timnath" is a worrying beginning. It was a step in the wrong direction. He stepped onto the territory of the enemy to enter into an alliance with the Philistines... Timnath means "portion assigned." He left his occupation to seek a portion with the Philistines. Yet it was of the Lord in the sense that He permitted it for a wise purpose. And on that wrong course he came to the vineyards of Timnath and met the roaring lion. The lion is a picture of Satan (Amos 3:8; 1 Peter 5:8). He roared at the Nazarite, as Satan still roars against anyone who bears the marks of separation to God.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how much blame the journey itself carries. Another writer stresses that God Himself moved Samson against the oppressors, whatever his own motives were:

Whatever Samson's motives and conduct may have been, it was the Holy One, as we are told, who prompted him against the aggressors of Israel... So there was an arrest on the road. We know that a spirit of ease and self-indulgence is quick to find a lion in the way. It can invent one where none exists. But here was a real lion, and it roared against the self-willed young man.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why a lion, and why now

The lion was no random hazard on the road. One writer ties the attack to the reason Samson was born at all:

Keep in mind that Samson came into the world for one express purpose: to overthrow the Philistines and so set God's people free. Since this was his mission, it is not surprising that a young lion — a picture of Satan's power — roared against him.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

A roar is noise before it is teeth. One writer draws out the tactic behind the noise:

Nothing is more terrifying than the roar of the lion. Satan tried to frighten the holy soul of Christ, to make Him abandon the divine path that led down to the sacrifice. In the power of the Holy Spirit, and in perfect dependence on His Father, the Lord withstood him in the garden on the Mount of Olives... In just the same form Satan presents himself to the children of God. "Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour" (1 Peter 5:8). If he does not succeed in luring us, he tries to frighten us. Now the young lion faced Samson, coming up against him from the country of the Philistines. Here his Nazariteship showed its full power, and that power is the power of the Spirit of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Nothing in his hand

Samson is unarmed, and that empty hand is taken as the lesson of the scene. The point drawn is about method — how the Philistines are to be beaten at all:

Here the Lord teaches him that it is not by an unholy alliance with evil, but by outright opposition to it that he must overcome; and in the long run he practically comes to this.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same writer presses the contrast between the weapon Samson did not need and the marriage he thought he did:

God appears to be teaching him this. His Spirit can enable him to overcome the direct enemy without any help, for he had "nothing in his hand." How much more can He do it without any human plan of an unholy union. Unaided, Samson faces this terrible enemy and succeeds so completely that through God he "tore the lion in pieces as one tears a young goat."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A message to the man himself

The encounter is read as God speaking to His servant at the exact moment his heart had already wandered:

But when the young lion roared against him, "the Spirit of the Lord rushed upon him, and he tore the lion in pieces as one tears a young goat." This was surely God's voice to His servant, reminding him that he would be above all the enemy's power as long as he walked in keeping with his call and mission.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A victory he told no one about

His parents were on the road with him. One writer notes what Samson told them, and what he did not:

Samson's victory over the lion of Timnath was not only a proof of strength; it was a secret between him and God. When his eyes were drawn to the daughter of the Philistines, he told his parents about it; about his victory he told no one... All that, kept unbroken between his soul and God, was for him the only means of following a path of blessing in this world.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Down. The road to Timnah took Samson onto enemy ground — yet God permitted it for a wise purpose.

- Roar. The lion pictures Satan's power. When he cannot lure us, he tries to frighten us.

- Spirit. The strength was not Samson's own. The Spirit came on him, and there his separation to God showed its full power.

- Empty. He had nothing in his hand. He needed no weapon — and far less the Philistine marriage he was travelling to make.

- Secret. The victory stayed between him and God. One writer calls that hidden communion his only way to walk a path of blessing.

Judges 14:6 · Darby

and the Spirit of Jehovah came upon him, and he rent it as one rends a kid, and nothing was in his hand. And he did not tell his father or his mother what he had done.

Samson is on his way to Timnah to marry a Philistine woman when a young lion roars at him. The Spirit of the LORD then rushes on a self-willed man, and the verse closes with a secret he keeps from his parents.

The Spirit of the LORD rushed upon him

The verse describes power arriving from outside the man, not a permanent indwelling. One writer calls this amazing, given where Samson was going, and he separates it from what believers know now.

A young lion roared at him, so there was an arrest on the road. We know that the spirit of ease and self-indulgence easily finds a lion in the way. It can even make one where there is none. But here was a real lion, and it roared at the self-willed youth. Then "the Spirit of the LORD rushed upon him" — an amazing fact to some minds, given the circumstances. This is the agent of divine power at work. It is in no way the seal of redemption or the pledge of the inheritance, as we know Him dwelling in us now, since Jesus shed His blood.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Nothing in his hand

The verse notes that Samson was empty-handed. One writer reads the whole scene from there: an open attack is less dangerous than a seduction, and no weapon shared the credit for the win.

Satan appears here in one of his many forms. The seduction may lead into the ambush, and the ambush into open assault. But in open attack he is less to be feared than elsewhere. The soldier of Christ is more easily lulled to sleep than beaten in battle. The Spirit of the LORD comes on Samson at once, and he wakes up to his strength. He tears the lion without a weapon in his hand, as easily as one would tear a young goat. It is the power of God, but worked out in the living energy of a man stripped bare of all other help. With such help the mightiest foe goes down as easily as the weakest. There is no need to measure difficulties. Just be sure of this: the greatest opposition means the greatest triumph. And it is the glory of the clay jar that the power's excellence belongs to God and not to us.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A lesson on the road he was already taking

Samson was travelling toward a marriage with the enemy. The lion met him on that very road. The way he won taught him how to deal with the enemy.

Here the Lord teaches him how he must overcome. It is not by an unholy alliance with evil, but by direct opposition to it. And in the end he does come to this.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer hears God's voice in the same event, with a condition attached.

But when the young lion roared against him, "the Spirit of the LORD rushed upon him, and he tore the lion in pieces as one tears a young goat." This was surely God's voice to His servant. It reminded him that he would be stronger than all the enemy's power, as long as he walked in keeping with his call and mission. "The lion," as another has said, "has no strength against one who belongs to Christ."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

He told no one

The verse ends with Samson saying nothing to his father and mother. That silence fits a pattern in his life.

Samson's victory over the lion of Timnah was not only a proof of strength; it was a secret between him and God. He told his parents about the Philistine woman who had caught his eye. About his victory he told no one. Samson's life was full of secrets and at the same time full of acts of power. Even his Nazarite separation was a secret, a link between his own soul and the LORD that no one knew about. This link is for us communion.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Great gift, small man

The same note sounds again and again in Samson's story: the Spirit of the LORD rushing on him. It never measures the man himself.

When we see these words we may be sure that the conflict is entirely according to God and without mixture. We can also win such victories. Our victories do not depend on a temporary action of the Holy Spirit coming on us from outside. They rest on redemption: God has sealed us with the Holy Spirit, who is the Spirit of power. Still, we cannot measure the moral worth of a man of God by the greatness of his gift. Nowhere in Scripture do we find a stronger man than Samson, nor one weaker morally.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Spirit — The strength was not Samson's. The Spirit rushed on him from outside, as the agent of divine power, not as the seal of redemption believers now have.

- Empty-handed — He held no weapon, so nothing could share the credit. The greater the opposition, the clearer it is that the power is God's.

- Straight on — The Lord taught him on the road to a Philistine wedding: beat the enemy head-on, never by alliance.

- Secret — He told no one. That hidden link between his soul and God is what communion means.

- Gift is not character — No man in Scripture is stronger than Samson, and none is weaker morally. A great gift is no measure of the man.

Judges 14:7 · Darby

And he went down and talked with the woman; and she pleased Samson well.

Samson has just torn a lion apart with his bare hands. Now he walks on into Timnah, a town of the Philistines, to talk with the woman he has chosen. The verse records no prayer and no counsel — only a man judging a choice by what looked good to him.

What "Right in His Eyes" Means

Older translations end the verse "she pleased Samson well." One writer links that wording to the sentence that closes the whole book of Judges.

Decline is immediate and rapid: "And Samson went down." His affection was not set among the people of God. He became motivated by lust and not love — the lust of the eyes. The German Bible translates the last phrase of verse 3, "she pleases me well," as "she is right in my eyes." That fits the closing summary of the book of Judges, given in its final verse.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The Question He Never Asked

The same phrase appears twice in the chapter — once to his parents, once here after he had seen her again. One writer treats that repetition as the key to the whole failure.

It is quite true that "it was from the LORD, for he was seeking an opportunity against the Philistines." But it was still true that this alliance with a woman of the world — "the world inside the enclosure of God's people" — was a clear departure from the path of separation. It was open disobedience to the word of God. What was it, then, that drew him into this sin? Twice we are told that the Philistine woman pleased Samson well (chap. 14:7)... Two things led him astray — the lust of the eyes, and the satisfying of his affections. This woman answered the desires of his heart. He went ahead to get what he wanted, without seeking counsel from God. The question was never asked whether she pleased God; it was enough that she pleased Samson.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Strong Against the Lion, Weak Before the Woman

Verse 6 and verse 7 sit side by side. The man who had just destroyed a lion now gives way to a look.

Then in the power of the Spirit who came upon Samson he tore the lion apart like a young goat. Then he saw the woman and she pleased him well. Strange contrast! In the power of the Spirit he tore the lion, and then falls victim to the enemy in another form. How often this is the case in the experiences of God's people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer draws out why the vineyard was the more dangerous place of the two.

It is quite natural that the vineyards of Timnah should contain lions too. Satan is here too, in one of his many forms. The enticement may lead into the ambush, and so into the open attack. But we have less to fear from him here than elsewhere. The soldier of Christ is more easily lulled to sleep than beaten in battle.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A Divided Heart, Still Used by God

Verse 4 says the marriage was from the LORD. Writers point out that this explains God's purpose. It does not excuse Samson's motive.

Samson was not single-eyed; he brought a divided heart to the work. He tried to combine pleasing his own eyes with his hatred of the enemy of his people. He was holding out his left hand to the world while wanting to fight it with his right. Yet God took note of what there was for Him in this divided heart. "It was from the LORD" — He could use even Samson's weaknesses to carry out His purposes of grace toward His people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Secret He Kept

Verse 6 says he did not tell his parents what he had done to the lion. Verse 7 shows what he did talk about. Samson was a Nazirite, a man set apart to God.

Samson's victory over the lion of Timnah was not only a proof of strength; it was a secret between him and God. When his eyes turned to the daughter of the Philistines, he told his parents about it. About his victory he told no one... Even his Nazirite separation was a secret, a link, unknown to anyone, between his own soul and the LORD. This link is for us communion... He kept all of that unbroken between his soul and God. That was his only way of walking a path of blessing in the middle of this world.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Eyes. The verse turns on sight: what was right in Samson's eyes, not what was right in God's. The same standard closes the whole book of Judges.

- Question. He asked whether she pleased him. He never asked whether she pleased God. He moved ahead without seeking counsel.

- Contrast. The Spirit's power tore a lion apart in verse 6; a look undid him in verse 7 — the enemy simply changed form.

- Danger. The vineyard is riskier than the battlefield. Satan lulls a soldier to sleep more easily than he beats him in a fight.

- Secret. Samson spoke about the woman and said nothing about the victory. That hidden link with God, kept unbroken, was his only way of walking a path of blessing.

Judges 14:8 · Darby

And he returned after a time to take her, and he turned aside to see the carcase of the lion; and behold, [there was] a swarm of bees in the carcase of the lion, and honey;

Samson stops on the road to Timnah to look at the lion he had killed, and finds bees and honey in the carcass. The sight becomes his riddle, and it raises a question: why did the man who saw it never learn from it?

A victory kept between himself and God

Samson killed the lion with no one else there, and he kept it that way. One writer counts four things Samson held back in this chapter.

The victory of Samson over the lion of Timnah was not only a proof of strength; it was a secret between him and God. He told his parents when the Philistine woman caught his eye. About his victory he told no one. His life was full of secrets and at the same time full of acts of power. Even his life as a Nazirite was a secret — a link between his own soul and the Lord that no one knew about. This link is, for us, communion. We meet four secrets in this chapter. Samson did not tell his parents his plans, or the part the Lord had in them (v. 4). He did not tell them of his victory (v. 6), where he got the honey (v. 9), or his riddle (v. 16).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Out of the eater, something to eat

Samson found the honey inside the body of the enemy that had attacked him. Commentators press that reversal hardest.

A swarm of bees had made a hive in the sun-dried carcass of the lion. Death had made room for abundant life and ordered work. The product is the honey that, with milk, gave the land of Canaan its special character. So the eater yielded food, and the strong yielded sweetness. God's mightier power met and subdued the power that was against us. Out of it always comes sweetness and refreshment for the people of God... The cross showed this most gloriously, where power appeared in weakness... The battlefield becomes a banqueting hall. The table is spread not only "in the presence of our enemies," but out of what they themselves provided.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer names who the lion stands for, and why believers need not fear him.

This is the "riddle," the secret of God's people. The lion has no strength against one who belongs to Christ. Christ has destroyed the strength of him who had the power of death. By the might of the Spirit of Christ our warfare is victory, and honey flows from it. But this is carried on in the secret of communion with the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Bees in a lion: two natures, not one improved

One writer reads the hive inside the predator as a picture of being born again.

When a man is born again, the Spirit of God produces a new life in him through the Word received by faith. That life and nature is as different from the old as the nature of the bee was from the nature of the lion... What is more, the new does not improve the old, any more than the bees or their honey improved the lion's carcass. Hear the word of the Lord to Nicodemus: "That which is born of the flesh is flesh"... "and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit," John 3:6.

Modernised from George CuttingOriginal wording

Clever with the riddle, slow with the lesson

Samson could turn the honey into a puzzle for others. He could not turn it into guidance for himself.

Is it not clear that Samson barely understood what God was teaching him by the lion he killed, and by the lion's carcass he found with the honey in it? Carried away by his uncontrolled feelings (whatever end God might turn it all to, for He always governs), he was mighty to act; but in understanding he was little more than an unconscious instrument.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

This gap between knowing a truth and applying it is treated as a common experience, not a one-off failure.

This gives rise to the riddle, which Samson knew but could not apply to his own situation. How often this is the case with us! How much sorrow and self-will we bring on ourselves, because we do not take truth in by faith and see how well it fits us... This explains why God so often lets us carry on with our own plans. We have learned truth which, if we applied it, would replace those plans altogether and cast us more consciously on God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The other reading: honey on enemy ground

Commentators differ on whether the honey is only a blessing here. One suggests that the enemy who failed to frighten Samson tried a sweeter approach.

Satan as a lion is put to flight and destroyed. That is one form of defeat. But then comes the honey — subtle and appealing, found in what looks like a harmless carcass, a beaten foe — and it will draw the soul away from God. I do not think these two applications contradict each other... But look at the picture in the light of the facts: Samson was departing from God. So I would commend the view I have suggested. He was on a downward path, and Satan, finding his roar did not frighten Samson, tried what honey could do for him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The odd scene also holds a mirror up to Samson himself.

This is completely out of character for bees, for they normally avoid corruption of any kind... Honey pictures the ministry of the Word of God, which is sweet... God gifted Samson to help others. But by keeping company with the Philistines, he tied his ministry to the corruption of death... Bees swarming in a dead body did not fit. Neither did Samson's company with the enemy, and that should have troubled him just as much.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret — Samson killed the lion with no one watching, and told no one afterwards. That hidden link with God is what we call communion.

- Sweetness — the honey lay in the body of the enemy. God subdues what was against us, and it becomes food.

- Separation — bees in a lion picture a new life. It does not improve the old life. It is as different as spirit is from flesh.

- Shortfall — Samson could pose the riddle but never applied it. Truth we admire but never apply leaves us walking our own way.

- Snare — sweetness tasted on enemy ground can pull a soul off course. Where the roar failed, honey may win.

Judges 14:9 · Darby

and he took it out in his hands, and went on, and ate as he went. And he came to his father and to his mother, and gave them, and they ate; but he did not tell them that he had taken the honey out of the carcase of the lion.

On the way to Timnah, Samson had killed a lion. Later he passed that way again and found bees and honey inside the carcass. This one verse holds the sweetest picture in his story and the first sign of his ruin. Commentators read it from both sides.

Honey out of the dead lion

The victory came before the sweetness, and the sweetness came out of the very thing that had threatened him.

Before his marriage Samson had slain the lion, and had found honey in its carcass. He had strength from God while he walked in his integrity. This is the "riddle," the secret of God's people. The lion has no strength against one who belongs to Christ. Christ has destroyed the strength of him who had the power of death. By the might of the Spirit of Christ our warfare is victory, and honey flows from it. But this is carried on in the secret of communion with the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Applied to the gospel, the enemy's defeat becomes the table where believers are fed.

The conquered lion became the source of food. In the same way, when we were captives of Satan and in his power, our blessed Lord came down and overthrew him... That very occasion becomes the means of our spiritual food, the richest sustenance of heaven, honey out of the carcass. Surely from the cross of Christ all sweetness and all food has come.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Fed first, then sharing

The order in the verse matters: he is eating on the road before he reaches his parents.

If we win a victory over him — now made easy — and treat him as a defeated foe, our souls will be filled with strength and sweetness. We shall be able to give others some of what we have received. But, like Samson who ate as he went along, our own souls will have been fed first. Let us never treat Satan as a friend. If we do, we shall come away from that meeting beaten and weakened, embittered and starved.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Four things he did not tell

Samson was a Nazarite, a man set apart for God. Not telling his parents fits a pattern in this chapter. One writer reads his silence as communion kept unbroken.

The life of Samson abounded with secrets and at the same time with acts of power. Even his Nazariteship was a secret — a link between his own soul and Jehovah that no one knew about. This link is for us communion. We meet with four secrets in this chapter. Samson had not told his parents his intentions, nor the part Jehovah had in these things (v. 4). He had not told them of his victory (v. 6), nor where he had got the honey (v. 9), nor his riddle (v. 16). He kept all that unbroken between his soul and God. That was his only way of following a path of blessing in the middle of this world.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Others read the silence as concealment. One writer traces it to the law's ban on eating what is unclean. That ban, he says, "caused Samson to conceal from his father and mother where he got the honey" (The Bible Treasury). What he would not name, he still handed to them to eat.

Samson's parents are linked with him through this whole chapter. He drags them down into this defilement completely, making them share in his own folly... They might have said, We brought him up as a Nazarite, but he left the path of obedience when he grew up.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Sweetness in the wrong country

Honey was never evil in itself; where it is eaten is the question.

Honey is sweetness. You will remember that the land of Canaan is described as a land flowing with milk and honey. Honey in Canaan is good... But honey in the Philistines' land surely suggests something. As far as God is concerned, the question of eating honey is settled in connection with the sacrifices, where He forbade it. It stands for natural sweetness and natural attractiveness. Sweet things of a heavenly kind are of course proper food in a heavenly place. But to feed nature, and to enjoy the sweets of nature on the enemy's ground, I think is something else.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same writer keeps both readings: "I do not think these two applications contradict one another." Looking at Samson's downward path, he adds that "Satan, finding that his roar did not terrify Samson, tried what honey could do for him" (Samuel Ridout).

Truth he could state but not use

He could turn the incident into a riddle for others long before it did anything for him.

Carried away by his unchecked feelings, he was mighty to act — whatever end God might turn it all to, for He always governs. But as to understanding, he was little more than an unconscious instrument.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Victory first. Samson killed the lion before he found the honey. Sweetness here is the fruit of a beaten enemy, not a gift lying in the road.

- Feed, then feed others. Samson ate as he walked and only then shared; what has fed your own soul is what you have to give.

- Secrecy cuts both ways. Commentators differ. One sees a secret strength kept between Samson and God. Others see a man hiding where the food came from, because it was unclean.

- Shared defilement. He gave his parents food he would not explain. They shared his folly without knowing it.

- Power is not understanding. He was mighty to act, yet he grasped little of what he was doing.

Judges 14:10 · Darby

And his father went down to the woman, and Samson made there a feast; for so used the young men to do.

Samson's wedding feast happens in Philistine country, and it follows the custom of the young men of that day. Commentators ask what such a party cost a man set apart for God.

The Word Behind "Feast"

The Hebrew word behind "feast" says something about what was served.

The literal meaning of the word for 'feast' in Judges 14:10 (Hebrew mishteh) is 'drinking' or 'banquet'.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Samson was a Nazarite — a man vowed to be separate for God, and wine had no place in that life. Commentators differ on whether he broke that separation here. One writer points to what the account never says:

Samson was on slippery ground. This woman caught his eye, and he wanted to take her as his wife; for alliance with the world follows the lust of the eyes. Then he made a feast (v. 10) and sat down at it. No doubt he kept up the outward marks of his Nazariteship, since we are not told that he drank wine with the Philistines. Yet this meal ended sadly for him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer sees a pattern of broken separation running through Samson's life:

Samson was a judge through whom God brought about great victories. It is all the more tragic to see that again and again he seemed to break off his Nazarite separation. Instead of staying separate for God, he kept company with the enemies (Jdg. 14). His life was not free from contact with death or the enjoyment of wine (see Jdg. 14:9, 10).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The Place and the Custom

The verse fixes a place. His father goes down, and Samson holds the feast there. One writer shows how much of the story happens on that same ground.

Samson again went down into the territory of the Philistines. It was there that he made a feast. It was there that he did what was customary among the young men. It was there that he made a friend (v. 20). He played a game of cunning with those who were experts at cunning games, and he lost.

Modernised from Greg QuailOriginal wording

One Link Becomes Thirty

The feast brings thirty Philistine companions with it. One writer treats them as the price of the one tie Samson had already made, and as the point where the conflict starts.

This leads on to what follows, where the deep lack of fellowship between Nazarite and Philistine comes out clearly, and the strife that had to come begins. Samson goes on to complete his marriage. He makes a feast, as the custom was, and he receives thirty companions, all Philistines, to be with him. A man who is making a life-union with a woman of this people cannot refuse a wider tie.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The same thing happens when a believer takes up one principle that Scripture does not give:

You take only one, you are just going to marry one Philistine, and you find your house is full. You have got thirty, and they are companions for you, they are your friends. They are your spiritual companions. Take up one unscriptural principle, and a whole host of others just as unscriptural will come with it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Guest List Without His Own People

The verse opens with his father going down with him. Look at who else fills the room.

He made a feast to celebrate the occasion. Thirty young men, all Philistines, were brought there as guests, to be Samson's companions. We do not read of any Israelite guests except his father and mother.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the Week Cost Him

The feast is where Samson's secret slipped out of his hands, and where his happiness drained away.

Let us return to Samson's feast. He set his riddle before the Philistines, and he was right to think they would understand nothing about it. If it had not been for the feast, he would never have been in danger of giving himself away. But the enemy managed to rob him of the secret he had hidden so carefully. The world works on us quietly, and we lose our communion with God… But did this man of God have much peace and joy during the days of the feast? Far from it: it was a struggle with tears, worry and pressure (v. 17).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer turns the whole episode into one piece of advice:

May we learn from this lesson. If our dealings with the world have brought us painful experiences, let us hurry back to the Father's house. We never should have left it, even in thought. He lives there, and communion with Him is the source of our peace and happiness for the whole of our journey.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Down — Samson goes down to Philistine ground for the feast, and what he loses, he loses there.

- Drinking — the word for "feast" means a drinking banquet. Wine had no place in a life set apart for God, and commentators differ on whether Samson broke that separation.

- Custom — he did what "the young men used to do," copying the people he was meant to stay separate from.

- Thirty — one tie never stays single. The wife brings thirty companions, and nothing borrowed from the world comes alone.

- Back — the week brought tears and pressure, not joy. The way back is the Father's house he should never have left.

Judges 14:11 · Darby

And it came to pass when they saw him, that they brought thirty companions, and they were with him.

Samson comes to Timnah to complete his marriage. The wedding feast seats him among thirty young men of the very people he should have been fighting. What happens to a man set apart for God when he picks his company from God's enemies?

One Link Becomes Thirty

Samson cannot keep a secret, and he cannot keep his distance.

Samson is always telling his secrets. He is always eager to talk about things that nobody ought to know but himself. Things Philistines should never know about, he wants to tell them... He went down to marry one woman, and he finds he has thirty Philistines as companions. What kind of companions are these for a man who is to be the bitter enemy of these people? He is linked with one, and that one has grown to thirty. There he is with a whole company of Philistines in his house, and he associated with them.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Marrying into that nation carried terms Samson did not set.

What follows brings out clearly the basic lack of fellowship between Nazirite and Philistine, and the strife that had to come begins. Samson goes ahead with his marriage. He makes a feast, as the custom was, and receives thirty companions, all Philistines, to be with him. A man who ties his life to a woman of this people cannot refuse a wider connection.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Feasting Where He Should Have Been Fighting

Samson came into enemy country, and the enemy met him with a welcome.

Samson went to where the enemy was, not to fight but to feast. The enemy's mask was a mask of friendship... We should reject anything that denies, in teaching or in practice, that "friendship with the world is enmity with God."

Modernised from Greg QuailOriginal wording

The Outward Marks Still Standing

Samson was a Nazirite — a man separated to God by a vow that kept him from wine and from contact with death.

Samson was on slippery ground. His eyes were captivated, and he wanted to take this woman for his wife. That is the pattern: alliance with the world follows the lust of the eyes. Then he made a feast (v. 10) and sat down at it. He no doubt kept the outward marks of his Nazariteship, since we are not told that he drank wine with the Philistines. Yet this meal had a sorrowful ending for him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Another reading takes the feast itself as a breach of the vow:

Samson was a judge through whom God brought about great victories. It is all the more tragic to see that he seemed to break his Nazariteship again and again. Instead of being separated for God, he associated with the enemies (Judges 14). Contact with death and the enjoyment of wine were not unknown during his life. Samson's life gives us a warning. It shows in a striking way what happens when someone called to be separated to God fails.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The Companions Turn On Him

What did the week of feasting cost him?

The world has an insidious effect on us, leading to the loss of our communion with God. If our hearts, like Samson's, cling in any way to what the world offers us, it will not be long before we lose our communion. Losing communion does not at first mean losing strength, but it is the road that leads there. As long as the Nazirite vow lasts, even outwardly, strength will not be lacking — as Samson proved to the Philistines in the matter of the thirty changes of garments. But did this man of God have much peace and joy during the days of the feast? On the contrary, it was a struggle with tears, worry and pressure (v. 17)... Samson would never have thought that his thirty companions, helped by his wife, would lay traps to plunder him. The thirty changes of garments belonged to him by right.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Same Company Kept Today

The same alliance shows up in church life today.

He went down to Timnath alone. He met the woman, then he made a feast and was surrounded by thirty Philistines as companions. He had allied himself with the enemy. This compromise, this mixing with the enemies of the cross of Christ, is the common thing today. It has led to the grieving of the Spirit and the loss of power... People look to the world for help in getting deliverance from the world! Worldly attractions, eloquent speakers, exquisite music, clever schemes for gathering crowds — all these are daughters of the Philistine, very fair, all serving religion and pleasing us well. But they are very, very dangerous.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- One. Samson went down for one Philistine tie. The whole collapse starts with that single link.

- Thirty. One tie brought thirty more. He could not marry into that people and refuse their company.

- Feast. He came where the enemy was, not to fight but to eat. The enemy wore the mask of friendship.

- Loss. Clinging to what the world offers costs communion first. His wedding week turned into tears, worry and pressure.

- Plunder. The thirty "companions" ended as the men who robbed him. Ask the world for help against the world, and you invite the same danger.

Judges 14:12 · Darby

And Samson said to them, Let me now propound a riddle to you; if ye clearly explain it to me within the seven days of the feast, and find [it] out, then I will give you thirty shirts, and thirty changes of garments.

At his wedding feast in Timnah, Samson turns a secret into a public bet with thirty Philistine guests. The secret is honey he found in a dead lion, and it raises two questions: why stake something he had shared only with God, and what does the riddle mean?

The wager

One writer notes how little sense the prize makes for the man offering it.

Samson proposed a riddle to the thirty young men. If they solved it, he would give them thirty linen garments and thirty changes of clothing. If they did not solve it, they must give the same to him. This was a foolish proposal, for what would he — one man — do with the clothes for thirty men? Still, the men accepted the wager.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One alliance, thirty companions

The thirty men he bets against were not friends he chose. They came with the marriage.

He went down to marry one woman, he finds he has thirty Philistines as companions. What kind of companions are these for a man who is to be the bitter enemy of these people? He is linked with one, and that one has grown to thirty. There he is with a whole company of Philistines in his house, and he associated with them.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Ridout draws the lesson out for anyone who thinks a single concession stays single:

You take but one, you are just going to marry one Philistine, and find your house is full. You have got thirty, and they are companions for you, they are your friends. They are your spiritual companions. You cannot take up one unscriptural principle on its own. A whole host of others, just as unscriptural, follow with it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What he is staking

The answer to the riddle was something Samson had told nobody. One writer weighs what that kind of secret was worth to him.

Samson's victory over the lion at Timnah was not only a proof of strength. It was a secret between him and God… Even his life as a Nazarite, set apart to God, was a secret. It was a link between his own soul and Jehovah, and no one else knew of it. This link is for us communion. We meet with four secrets in this chapter. Samson had not told his parents what he meant to do, nor the part Jehovah had in these things (v. 4). He had not told them of his victory (v. 6), nor where he got the honey (v. 9), nor his riddle (v. 16). He kept all that unbroken between his soul and God. For him that was the only way to follow a path of blessing in the middle of this world.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Riddles, wisdom, and changes of clothing

Riddles were a normal part of a feast. One writer asks what kind of wisdom this one really tests, and why the prize is clothing.

At once the riddle is proposed. Riddles were common enough in those days, as a test of wisdom. And we have to remember that wisdom in Scripture is not simply what the world counts wisdom, but what is wisdom before God… But if they can solve it, then each one shall have a change of garments. For anyone who can see into the secrets of a life lived with God must have his "habits" changed to match it. They could not see into it. By dishonest dealing with the Philistine wife they learned it, and they were repaid with Philistine garments from Ashkelon.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The answer the riddle points to

The answer to the riddle lies in the dead lion. One writer traces the gospel in it.

Satan is the eater, the lion. "Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour." The conquered lion became the source of food. In the same way, when we were captives of Satan and in his power, our blessed Lord came down and overthrew him. So Satan's mastery over us gave the very occasion for Christ to overthrow him. That occasion becomes the means of our spiritual food, the richest food of heaven, honey out of the carcass. Surely from the cross of Christ all sweetness and all food has come.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the guests were stuck

The guests never got the answer. One writer takes that failure as a picture of religion without life.

The Philistines who came to the wedding feast were only outwardly attached to Samson. They did not taste the honey from the lion's carcass, and the whole matter was nothing more than a riddle to them. These Philistines stand for people who have accepted the form of Christianity without its power. To all such, the truth of God is only so many doctrines to be discussed and riddles to be solved. For "the natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned."

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Alliance — one marriage to a Philistine woman brought thirty Philistine companions into his house.

- Compromise — one unscriptural principle never comes alone; a whole host follows it.

- Secret — his victory over the lion was a link between his soul and God alone, and that link is communion.

- Stake — he wagers that secret for garments; the men who pry it out get Philistine clothes from Ashkelon.

- Sweetness — the riddle's answer is the cross: food out of the eater, honey out of the strong. Those with only an outward tie to Samson never tasted it.

Judges 14:13 · Darby

But if ye cannot explain [it] to me, then shall ye give me thirty shirts, and thirty changes of garments. And they said to him, Propound thy riddle, that we may hear it.

Samson sits at his own wedding feast with thirty Philistine guests. He bets the secret of his life with God against thirty sets of clothes — and the men across the table are the people he was meant to fight.

The Terms of the Wager

The stake is lopsided from the start. One commentator notes the plain absurdity of it.

Samson proposed a riddle to the thirty young men, telling them that if they solved it he would give them thirty linen garments and thirty changes of clothing. If they did not solve it, then they must give the same to him. This was rather a foolish proposal, for what would he (one man) do with the clothes for thirty men? However, they accepted the wager.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why a Riddle at All

Behind the question of what he staked lies a sharper one: why he was playing this game with these men at all.

Samson is always telling his secrets. He is always anxious to talk about things that nobody ought to know but himself. Things that surely Philistines ought not to know about, he wants to tell them. And notice, he does not come right out and tell them plainly, but he puts a riddle to them. He went down to marry one woman, and he finds he has thirty Philistines as companions. What kind of companions are these for a man who is to be the bitter enemy of these people? He is linked with one, and that one has grown to thirty.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What He Was Really Staking

What he staked is not a clever puzzle. It is what God showed him on the road, where he killed a lion and later found honey in its carcass.

Before his marriage Samson had killed the lion and had found honey in its carcass. He had strength from God while walking in his integrity. This is the "riddle," the secret of God's people. The lion has no strength against one who belongs to Christ. Christ has destroyed the strength of him who had the power of death. By the might of the Spirit of Christ our warfare is victory, and honey flows from it. But this is carried on in the secret of communion with the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Thirty Changes of Garments

The prize Samson names is not random. A change of garments means a change of habits, so no Philistine could collect it honestly.

Right away we find the riddle proposed. Riddles were common in those days, as a test of wisdom. And we have to remember that in Scripture wisdom is not simply what the world counts wisdom, but what is wisdom before God. The riddle, in its spiritual meaning, is a true test of this, and no one should imagine that a Philistine can explain it. Samson has no such thought. But if they can do this, then they shall each have a change of garments. Anyone who can see into the secrets of a life with God must have habits changed to match it. They could not see into it. They learn it by dishonest dealing with the Philistine wife, and they are repaid with Philistine garments. So they are suitably dressed, and with their own shame, and so the necessary strife begins.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A Prize Won the Wrong Way

They won the bet, but not honestly. Samson paid them with garments taken from other Philistines. That is not a true change of garments, and the difference is the whole point.

He gives them, not changes of clothing in the spiritual sense, but simply other garments like the very ones they wore, Philistine robes. For the man who gets the gospel secret in a way that is not God's way may get a change of clothing. There are plenty of people who get the gospel secret in their heads but not in their hearts. Plenty can tell you that out of Satan's power has come the sweetness of God's blessing. They say it off because they have heard somebody else say it. They have not learned it in their own soul. They may get a change of clothing, but it is only a new garment of the old creation.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- The secret was his strength. He staked more than a puzzle. It was what God taught him on the road, and it was meant to be kept in communion with the Lord.

- The secret was wagered. He set it against clothes, among the men he should have fought, because he could not resist telling what nobody else should know.

- The secret has a matching prize. The stake was garments for a reason. Whoever can read a life lived with God must have their own habits changed to match it.

- The secret cannot be guessed. No Philistine could see into it. They got the answer only by dishonest dealing with Samson's wife.

- The secret can be counterfeited. Learn it second-hand and you get a change of clothes that is still the old wardrobe. The head fills with gospel words and nothing underneath is new.

Judges 14:14 · Darby

And he said to them, Out of the eater came forth food, And out of the strong came forth sweetness. And they could not in three days explain the riddle.

Samson kills a lion on the road to Timnah, and later finds bees and honey inside its dried-out carcass. At his wedding feast he turns that private moment into a riddle for thirty Philistine guests. What do the eater and the strong one stand for? And why could no one at that table solve it?

The Eater and the Food

Most commentators read the lion as the enemy of God's people. The honey is what came out of his defeat at the cross.

Satan is the eater, the lion. "Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour." The conquered lion became the source of food. In the same way, when we were captives of Satan and in his power, our blessed Lord came down and overthrew him. "Through death He destroyed the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil." So Satan's mastery over us gave Christ the occasion to overthrow him. That occasion becomes the means of our spiritual food, the richest food heaven has — honey out of the carcass. Surely from the cross of Christ all sweetness and all food has come.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Strength Undone by Weakness

Samson won by sheer strength. The One this picture points to won the opposite way.

In that image we see the enemy in great power, but God infinitely above him. He is able to use the least worthy vessel of His power, and He sees fit to do it. Out of the slain enemy He provides the sweetest refreshment. How triumphantly Christ our Lord has done this — but in how different a way! Absolutely pure Himself, He was made sin for us, so that we might become God's righteousness in Him. Out of that defeat He gave us our unfailing comfort. What a bright contrast between Samson and the Man who overthrew Satan on that cross! There He Himself reached the very lowest point of weakness. For He won by no outward strength but by suffering. He was crucified in weakness, but rose in the power of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Battlefield Becomes a Table

This is not only about one past victory. The same thing happens wherever God's power meets what is against His people.

God's mightier power has met and subdued the power that was against us. Out of that defeated power there always comes sweetness and refreshment for the people of God. This happens because life has come in where death was, and order has risen out of the grip of corruption... The same is true, in measure, in every defeat of the enemy where the Spirit of God works in the living energy of the saint of God. The battlefield becomes a banquet hall. The table is spread not only "in the presence of our enemies," but out of what they themselves supplied.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the Guests Were Stuck

Three days passed and the guests were stuck. One writer links that failure to what the riddle was really testing.

The riddle, in its spiritual meaning, is a true test of wisdom as God counts it, and no one should imagine that a Philistine can explain it. Samson has no such thought. But if they can do it, each of them will get a change of clothing. Anyone who can see into the secrets of a life with God must have his habits changed to match. They could not see into it. They learn it by dishonest work on the Philistine wife.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The Riddle in a Sickbed

One writer wrote these words to a sick friend, to explain how he had lived through his own griefs.

My comfort is, "You, Lord, are above it and behind it." So I can give thanks for it as one of the "all things." With a broken heart and a subdued will, I have given thanks for sorrows that cut deep into my own soul. I do not say this lightly, but as before God. You know I could not have lived through this and that. Your grace let me receive it from Your hand, and find that out of the eater came something to eat.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

A Warning in the Honey

Ridout gives that reading first, then adds a second one. Where Samson ate his honey matters.

Honey is sweetness, and the land of Canaan is called a land flowing with milk and honey. Honey in Canaan is good... But honey in the land of the Philistines surely suggests something. "Have you found honey? Eat only enough for you." As far as God is concerned, the question of eating honey was settled with the sacrifices, where He forbade it. It stands for natural sweetness and natural attractiveness. Sweet things of a heavenly kind are, of course, the right food in a heavenly place. But to feed nature, and to enjoy the sweets of nature on enemy ground, I think is something else. Satan as a lion is put to flight and destroyed. But out of a carcass that seems able to do no harm comes that subtle honey which will draw the soul away from God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Out of the eater — the lion is the enemy who devours; his defeat, not his absence, supplies the food.

- Out of the cross — Christ won by suffering, not by muscle. He was crucified in weakness and raised in the power of God, and our sweetness comes from that defeat of the strong one.

- Out of the battlefield — the pattern repeats in every defeat of the enemy. The table is spread in front of our enemies, out of what they themselves supplied.

- Out of sorrow — the words fit a sickbed as well as a wedding feast: grief taken from God's hand becomes food.

- Out of reach — no Philistine can read this riddle. The secret belongs to a life with God, and honey eaten on enemy ground is a snare, not a meal.

Judges 14:15 · Darby

And it came to pass on the seventh day, that they said to Samson's wife, Persuade thy husband, that he may explain to us the riddle, lest we burn thee and thy father's house with fire. Have ye invited us to impoverish us, -- is it not [so]?

Samson's wedding feast has turned sour: the thirty Philistine companions cannot solve his riddle, so they threaten his bride instead of answering. The cost of his alliance with the enemy lands first on her.

Betrayed by the company he chose

The threat does not fall on Samson but on the woman he married, and it comes from her own friends. Samson is a Nazarite, a man under a vow that set him apart for God — and this is the company he keeps.

The person who wants to tell the secret, and yet does not want to, will find that the secret comes out. Think of the person who plays with the enemies of God. He is not quite ready to open his heart to them, but he still hints at ways they might get into the secret of his spiritual life. He will find that the very principle he has taken as the partner of his life is the one that betrays him into giving up the secret he guards so jealously. That is what Samson finds. His wife's friends threaten her that they will burn her house with fire if she does not get the secret out of him somehow. Fine company for a Nazarite to keep. So, in fear of that threat, she spends what should be a very happy time in tears. She knows well that her companions are cruel enough to carry out what they say.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the feast cost him

Samson had kept the story of the lion between himself and God. It was the feast that put it within reach of the Philistines.

He put his riddle to the Philistines, rightly supposing they would understand nothing about it. Indeed, if it had not been for the feast, he would not have been in danger of betraying himself. But the enemy succeeded in robbing him of what he had so carefully hidden. The world has a subtle, damaging effect on us. It leads to the loss of our communion with God. … But did this man of God have much peace and joy during the days of the feast? On the contrary, it was a struggle with tears, worry and pressure. … Samson would never have thought that his thirty companions, helped by his wife, would set traps to plunder him. The thirty changes of clothes belonged to him by right.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A bride pulled two ways

She has a husband on one side and her own people on the other. Their threat decides where she stands.

A marriage attempted in such circumstances must end as it does here: she puts the Philistine cause above her own husband. Her devotion to him dissolves in fear of her own people. They threaten her with ruin unless she betrays him. If she had clung to him in true devotion, as she should have, he would certainly have saved her from the disaster she dreaded. But failing to do this, she betrays and compromises the one she should have suffered for.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The fire she ran from

The threat in this verse came true later, and the betrayal bought her nothing.

They take their revenge, not on Samson, but on the woman who had betrayed him. They burn her and her father's house with fire. That was the very fate she had feared, and the threat of it had made her act unfaithfully to Samson. This teaches us that whatever we try to escape through unbelief and unrighteousness is sure to be our eventual doom. We may escape it for a moment, but our escape is, after all, the sure road to it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

God keeps His own character in a dark story

Nothing in this scene has God's approval — not the marriage, not the threat, not the treachery. That did not stop Him from acting.

He rescued failing Samson from the direct consequences of his sinful association, but He dealt out justice for treachery at the hands of their own people. … We can all understand righteousness where the ground is clearly approved by God. But is it not also strengthening to find that God knows how to give effect to His principles, even where everything was dark and faulty?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A failure God works through

The pressure applied here is what breaks off the marriage — and the breaking off is what frees Samson for the work he was born to do.

God brings about His ways not only by means of things He approves. He also makes everything work toward the result He wants — our very faults, His discipline, the opposition of Satan and of the world. Our unfaithfulness does not disturb the ways of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Alliance. The feast tied Samson to the Philistines. Sitting at their table put his secret within reach, and closeness to the world cost him communion with God first.

- Pressure. Threatened with fire, the bride weeps through what should have been a happy week. The man who chose her becomes the man she works against.

- Betrayal. Fear of her own people dissolved her loyalty. Had she clung to Samson, he could have saved her from the very thing she dreaded.

- Boomerang. What she betrayed him to escape fell on her anyway. What we flee through unbelief becomes the road to it.

- Overruling. God still dealt justly with the treachery. He used the wreckage of Samson's own folly to carry His purpose forward.

Judges 14:16 · Darby

And Samson's wife wept before him, and said, Thou dost but hate me, and lovest me not. Thou hast propounded the riddle to the children of my people, and hast not explained it to me. And he said to her, Behold, I have not explained it to my father nor my mother, and shall I explain it to thee?

Samson has set the men at the feast a riddle they cannot answer, and the seventh day has come. Now his wife weeps and accuses him of hating her, pressing for the answer he has kept even from his own parents.

The four secrets of Samson's life

The riddle is not the only thing Samson has kept quiet. One writer counts the hidden things in this chapter and names what held them together. (A Nazarite was a man set apart to God by a vow.)

The victory of Samson over the lion of Timnath was not only a proof of strength; it was a secret between him and God. When his eyes were drawn to the Philistine woman, he told his parents about her. About his victory he told no one. Samson's life was full of secrets and at the same time full of acts of power. Even his Nazarite vow was a secret — a link between his own soul and the LORD that no one knew about. For us, that link is communion. We meet four secrets in this chapter. Samson had not told his parents what he planned, or the part the LORD had in these things (v. 4). He had not told them of his victory (v. 6), or where he got the honey (v. 9), or his riddle (v. 16). Keeping all of it unbroken between his soul and God was his only way to walk a path of blessing in the world.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why she had no claim on it

Samson answers her demand by pointing to his parents. Another writer goes further: the secret was never his to give, because it belonged to a relationship she stood outside. (A Philistine was an outsider to Israel, God's people.)

So we cannot claim the secret of the Lord, the close relationship of God's people to Him, and the feelings it produces. The secret and the strength of the Lord belong to His redeemed people alone. How could Samson tell this to his Philistine wife? What weight would the special privileges of God's people carry with someone outside their number? And how can we speak of such privileges while we disown them by the very relationship we stand in? We disown them by handing over this secret. We then stop being separated and consecrated to God, and stop trusting Him as we can trust no one else.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Her tears and her loyalty

She says he hates her. But the reason for her crying is in the verse before, where her countrymen threaten her.

To answer a riddle like this the men would have to read Samson's mind. Samson gave them the seven days of the feast to find the answer. On the seventh day they threatened his wife with death if she would not get the answer for them (v. 15). She did not tell Samson about the threat, as a wife ought to have done. Instead she wept and begged him for the answer to the riddle. When Samson gave in, she passed the answer to the Philistines. How clear a proof was this that her heart was not with her husband but with her native people.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A secret half-held

Samson refuses her at first. One writer says a refusal like this is already half-given: the man hints at ways into his secret even while he holds it back.

Samson wants to tell his secret. Notice this: the man who wants to tell a secret, and yet does not want to, will find that it comes out. Think of the person who plays with the enemies of God. He is not quite ready to open his heart to them, yet he hints at ways they might get into the secret of his spiritual life. He will find that the very thing he took as the partner of his life is what betrays him, drawing out of him the secret he has guarded so closely.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the alliance delivered

A week of feasting should be a happy time. This one was not, and the writer traces that to what the world does to a heart that clings to it.

If our hearts cling in any way to what the world offers, as Samson's did, it will not be long before we lose our communion with God. Losing communion does not mean losing strength at once. It is, however, the road that leads there… But did this man of God have much peace and joy during the days of the feast? Far from it: it was a struggle with tears, care and pressure (v. 17). The very woman he had chosen betrayed him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

From this secret to the last one

One writer reads this loss as a warning of the loss that ends Samson's life.

Samson met his end because he told his secret. Right here at the beginning, his telling of it warns of what the end may be. He tells one secret here, and in the end he has to tell the deeper one: the secret of his whole separation to God, the secret of whatever testimony and power he has.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret — What Samson kept hidden — God's purpose, the lion, the honey, the riddle — was his link with God. That link is what communion means.

- Exclusive — The secret and the strength of the Lord belong to His redeemed people alone. Share them with an outsider and you give away the separation they rest on.

- Tears — She wept because her own people threatened her life, not because Samson hated her. She hid their threat from him, and that showed where her heart lay.

- Slippage — A man who half-guards a secret while playing with God's enemies will lose it. The partner he chose is the one who takes it.

- End — Losing communion does not cost strength at once, but it is the road there. The small secret given up here warns of the deeper one he gives up at the end.

Judges 14:17 · Darby

And she wept before him the seven days, while they had the feast. And it came to pass on the seventh day, that he explained it to her, for she pressed him. And she explained the riddle to the children of her people.

Samson's wife weeps through all seven days of the wedding feast. On the last day he gives in, tells her the answer to his riddle, and she hands it straight to her own people.

The Riddle: A Secret Between Samson and God

Before the feast, Samson had killed a lion and later found honey in its carcass. Samson was a Nazirite — a man set apart to God from birth. Writers point to how much of his life he kept hidden.

Samson's victory over the lion of Timnath was not only a proof of strength; it was a secret between him and God. When his eyes were drawn to the daughter of the Philistines, he told his parents about it; about his victory he told no one. Samson's life was full of secrets and at the same time full of acts of power. Even his Nazirite calling was a secret, a link between his own soul and the Lord that nobody knew about. This link is, for us, communion.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

The riddle was no party game. Darby traces it back to the lion and the honey.

Before his marriage Samson had killed the lion and had found honey in its carcass. He had strength from God while he walked in his integrity. This is the "riddle," the secret of God's people. The lion has no strength against one who belongs to Christ. Christ has destroyed the strength of the one who had the power of death. By the might of the Spirit of Christ our warfare is victory, and honey flows from it. But this is carried on in the secret of communion with the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

No Share in the Secret

The problem was not only that Samson talked too much. It was that the person asking had no share in the thing being asked about.

We cannot appeal to the secret of the Lord — the close relationship of God's people to Himself, and the feelings it produces. The secret and the strength of the Lord belong to His redeemed people alone. They are their right and their strength. How could this be told to his Philistine wife? What effect would privileges that belong only to God's people have on someone outside? How can we speak of these privileges when we disown them by the very relationship we are standing in? We disown them by handing over this secret. Then we stop being separated and consecrated to God. This experience should have kept Samson from taking a similar step later. But in many ways experience is useless in the things of God, because we need faith at the moment; it is God Himself whom we need.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Seven Days of Tears and Pressure

Her tears look like love. But weigh what the week of feasting cost Samson.

But did this man of God have much peace and joy during the days of the feast? On the contrary, it was a struggle with tears, worry and pressure (v. 17). It is hard to imagine that mixing with the world would produce such bad results, but it does.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Her silence is as telling as her weeping. Her countrymen had threatened her, and she sided with them.

She did not tell Samson about the threat, though a wife surely ought to have. She wept as she urged him to tell her the answer to the riddle. When Samson gave in, she told the Philistines the answer. What a clear proof this was that her heart was not with her husband but with her own people.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Small Surrender That Forecasts a Larger One

This small surrender at the feast points ahead to the last one.

Samson met his end because he told his secret. Right here at the beginning, his telling of a secret warns of how it may end. He tells this secret now. In the end he has to tell the deeper secret of his whole separation to God — the secret of any testimony and power he may have.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Betrayal Turned to Blessing

Commentators weigh what she lost by betraying him, and what the Lord did with the broken marriage.

If she had only clung to him in true devotion, as she should have, he would surely have saved her from the disaster she dreaded. Instead she betrays and compromises the one she should have suffered for. Samson is betrayed by the one he trusted most, where he would least expect treachery. But the Lord turns it into blessing, and the intended union is broken off. He must give it up to pay the penalty he had brought on himself by revealing his secret to the Philistine.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret. The riddle was Samson's own experience of God's strength — honey out of a dead lion. It belonged to communion with God, not to a wedding feast.

- Pressure. The tears were pressure, not love. Her heart was with her own people, and she hid the threat from him.

- Surrender. He gave away the smaller secret at the feast. Later he gave away the greater one — his separation to God.

- Exposure. Hand God's secret to someone who has no share in it, and you stop being separated and consecrated to God.

- Mercy. God turned the betrayal into blessing. He broke off the union, and Samson paid the price for giving the secret away.

Judges 14:18 · Darby

And the men of the city said to him on the seventh day before the sun went down, What is sweeter than honey, And what stronger than a lion? And he said to them, If ye had not ploughed with my heifer, Ye had not found out my riddle.

On the last day of the feast, the men of the city hand Samson his own answer. He knows at once that no one guessed it. His reply about the heifer names the betrayal. It also leaves a harder question: whose fault was it that the secret got out?

An answer nobody could have guessed

The riddle came out of something only Samson had seen: a lion he had killed and a honeycomb inside its carcass. No outsider could have reasoned his way to it.

To answer a riddle like this the men would have to be able to read Samson's mind... Of course no one would think of honey coming from a lion, and they knew nothing of a dead lion with honey in its carcass.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One writer reads the riddle as a real test of wisdom. No Philistine could solve it without cheating.

In its spiritual meaning, the riddle is a true test of wisdom before God, and no one should imagine that a Philistine can explain it. Samson does not expect them to. But if they can do it, each of them will get a change of garments. Anyone who can see into the secrets of a life with God must have his "habits" changed to match. They could not see into it. They learned it by dishonest dealing with the Philistine wife.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The heifer, and the misplaced blame

A heifer is a young cow, put to work pulling a plough. That is the word Samson picks for his wife.

It is insulting to his wife that he calls her a heifer. But what did he expect after telling the answer to his wife, who was a Philistine?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Samson points the finger outward. Another writer suggests the sentence would have been truer the other way round.

He tells the riddle to his wife. She, of course, tells it to her companions and Samson's. Then they give him the answer. He sees the treachery and says, "If you had not plowed with my heifer, you would not have found out my riddle." Ah, if he had only turned it round: "If I had not plowed with your heifer." But he blames them, you see. He blames them for an alliance he had formed himself, and that alliance is how his secret reached them.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What he lost

Samson's life was full of things kept between himself and God. One writer gives that hidden link a name.

The life of Samson abounded with secrets and at the same time with acts of power. Even his Nazariteship was a secret, a link, unknown to any, between his own soul and Jehovah. This link is for us communion... He kept all that unbroken between his soul and God. That was the only way for him to walk a path of blessing while living in this world.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The feast is where he lost it. The same writer counts the cost of those seven days.

But the enemy managed to rob him of what he had hidden so carefully. The world works on us in a quiet, creeping way, and that leads to the loss of our communion with God. If our hearts cling in any way to what the world offers us, as Samson's did, we will soon lose our communion... But did this man of God have much peace and joy during the days of the feast? On the contrary, it was a struggle with tears, care and pressure (v. 17).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The first telling of a secret

The pattern set here returns later in his life with far worse results.

Samson met his end because he told his secret. Right at the start, this telling of a secret warns how it may end. Here Samson tells the riddle. In the end he has to tell the deeper secret of his whole separation to God — the secret of any testimony and power he may have.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Honey as an image

The Philistines reach for honey as the standard of sweetness. Elsewhere in Scripture that same sweetness carries a caution.

People count honey as the sweetest thing nature gives, and Judges 14:18 shows this. Honey, like leaven, had no place in the offerings people brought to God. Our Lord Jesus Christ was grace itself. But the grace of God is not natural sweetness, the kind close to human niceness, because truth as well as grace has reached us in Him.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God's hand in the wreckage

One writer looks at where the wife went wrong, and at what God did with the wreck.

If only she had held on to him in true devotion, as she should have, he would surely have saved her from the disaster she feared. Instead she betrays and compromises the one she should have suffered for... but the Lord turns it into blessing, and the planned union is broken off.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret — the riddle came out of something only Samson and God knew. That unbroken link was his path of blessing.

- Alliance — he tied himself to the Philistines. The feast is where the secret leaked out.

- Tears — days meant for joy became a struggle with tears and pressure. His own wife gave the answer away.

- Blame — he blamed them for an alliance he had formed himself. The honest version was, "If I had not plowed with your heifer."

- Overruling — God used the betrayal to break off a union Samson should never have sought. But the habit of telling secrets would one day cost him everything.

Judges 14:19 · Darby

And the Spirit of Jehovah came upon him, and he went down to Ashkelon, and slew of them thirty men, and took their spoil, and gave the changes of garments unto them that explained the riddle. And his anger was kindled, and he went up to his father's house.

Samson's wife had pressed the riddle's answer out of him and passed it to her people. Now the bet falls due. Two hard questions follow. Why does the Spirit of the LORD rush on a man in this state? And why does the debt cost thirty men in Ashkelon their lives?

Power on a man whose heart was never judged

The phrase "the Spirit of the LORD rushed upon him" comes back again and again in Samson's story. It tells us what the fight is worth. It does not tell us what the fighter is worth.

A third expression constantly occurs in these chapters: "The Spirit of Jehovah came upon him" (Judges 13:25; Judges 14:6, 19; Judges 15:14). When we see these words we may be sure that the conflict is entirely according to God and without mixture… Nevertheless, it is important to remark that we cannot estimate the moral worth of a man of God by the greatness of his gift. Nowhere in Scripture do we find a stronger man than Samson, nor one weaker morally… Samson was a Nazirite, upon whom the Spirit of God often came, but he was also a man whose heart had never been judged, and so his state was not in keeping with the gift he exercised.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Ashkelon: ground Israel never held

Samson did not pick this city at random.

One of the five principal cities of the Philistines. It fell to the lot of Judah, who took Ashkelon and its surrounding areas, Judges 1:18, but they did not really subdue it. It was in the hands of the Philistines when Samson came down to it.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the thirty garments were worth

Samson staked clothing on his riddle. The riddle tested whether a Philistine could read the secret of a life with God.

If they can do this, they shall each have a change of garments. Anyone who can see into the secrets of a life with God must have his "habits" changed to match it. They could not penetrate it. They learn it by dealing dishonestly with the Philistine wife, and their pay is Philistine garments from Ashkelon… So the clothes suit them, and they wear their own shame. And so the necessary strife begins.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

They stole the answer instead of finding it. So the clothes they won were the kind they already wore. One writer applies this to people who repeat a truth they never learned for themselves.

He gives them other garments like the very ones they wore — Philistine robes, not a change of clothing in the spiritual sense… A man may get the gospel secret in a way that is not God's way. He can still get a change of clothing. Plenty of people get the gospel secret in their heads, but not in their hearts… They may get a change of clothing, but it is only a new garment of the old creation. It is only turning over a new leaf, mere reformation, not the soul really set free.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Anger kindled, spoil given away, father's house regained

The verse ends in anger, and the anger was Samson's own. What ended the alliance was grace.

The grace of God preserved Samson from the final consequences of his mistake, and delivered him from an alliance God could not approve… "And his anger was kindled" (v. 19). Samson was a very selfish man, and he acted from the sense of the wrong done to him. Yet he won the victory over the enemies of Jehovah, and kept none of their spoil for himself; it went back to the world it came from. Then he left the scene of so much unhappiness and "went up to his father's house," which he never should have left to settle among the Philistines.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God's purpose running through a man's faults

Samson's motive was private anger. God's purpose was moving through it all the same.

God always works out His ways, and does so through a multitude of circumstances that are far from matching His thoughts. More than that, He uses these very circumstances to carry out His purposes… God brings about His ways not only by means of things He approves. He also makes our own faults, His discipline, and the opposition of Satan and of the world — in a word, everything — serve the result He wants. Our unfaithfulness does not disturb the ways of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Being used is not the same as understanding. Samson set a riddle he barely grasped himself.

Carried away by his unchecked feelings, he was mighty to act (whatever end God might turn it all to, for He always governs). But in understanding he was little more than an unconscious instrument. Yet he did propose a most instructive riddle, which set out rightly the condition of the people of God at that time.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Gift. The Spirit rushing on Samson certifies the fight, not the fighter. No one in Scripture was stronger, and no one weaker in his moral state.

- Gap. His heart was never judged, so his power and his state did not match. Ability is no measure of the man.

- Ground. Ashkelon was Philistine ground Judah had taken but never subdued. Samson paid the riddle's debt out of enemy soil.

- Garments. A stolen answer buys only Philistine robes — a change of clothes from the old creation, not a heart set free.

- Going home. His anger was selfish, yet he kept no spoil and went back to his father's house, the place he should never have left. God works His purpose out even through our faults.

Judges 14:20 · Darby

And Samson's wife was [given] to his companion, whom he had made his friend.

Samson's wedding week ends in insult. The bride's father gives her to the man who had stood beside Samson as his best friend. The verse raises the question Samson's whole life keeps asking. What happens when a man set apart for God ties himself to the people he should be fighting?

How Samson lost his wife

The break-up has a simple human explanation. Samson stormed off in anger, and her father took his absence for desertion.

Samson's anger was such, however, that he did not stay with his wife, but went back to his father's house, where he remained for a while. The girl's father evidently considered this to be desertion, and therefore gave his daughter to Samson's close friend, one of the thirty companions of the Philistines (v. 20). Of course there was carelessness on Samson's part as well as looseness on the girl's father's part.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The friend of the bridegroom

The word "companion" hides a role. This man had been the friend of the bridegroom — the one trusted to serve the wedding, later used by John the Baptist as a picture of his own place beside Christ.

At first, indeed, he goes to visit his wife with a young goat, unaware of what has taken place, and finds she has been given to the one who had acted as his "friend" — the "friend of the bridegroom": a custom to which John the Baptist later makes his well-known allusion (John 3:29). His anger breaks out, not as private vengeance against the woman of Timnah, however, but against the Philistines as a whole.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

No Philistine bond holds

Samson had treated the marriage as a real tie. The Philistines had not, and when he objected they simply offered him another woman.

He goes down at wheat harvest to visit his wife with a young goat, and finds that she has been taken from him — for surely no Philistine alliance is binding, even on their side, much less on the side of faith. She is taken from him, and when Samson protests, his father-in-law answers that he thought she had been abandoned, and therefore he had given her to a friend, and he offers another one. Philistines are always ready to do that, to offer some fresh link with themselves.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Friendship that wore a mask

The wedding took place on enemy ground. The thirty "companions" and the "friend" were the enemy wearing a smile.

Samson went to where the enemy was, not to fight but to feast. The enemy's mask was a mask of friendship. We should reject everything that has the character of denying that "friendship with the world is enmity with God," whether it is a teaching or a practice.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Why the union had to break

Some writers read the loss of the bride as God's own doing. He did not work a miracle. He let the friendship turn into open hostility.

We always carry a little of the world with us when, as children of God, we have mingled with it. But God uses this to separate us from the world by force and completely. He makes union impossible. He sets us in direct conflict with the world, in the very things that had formed our link with it. We had better have remained apart. But it is necessary that God should deal with us in this way... Think of a Nazirite married to a Philistine! God must break off a union like this by causing enmity and hostility to arise.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same event is described elsewhere as rescue. God used Samson's own weakness and his wife's unfaithfulness as the tool.

But God rescued His servant from the alliance he had contracted — not by any active intervention, but by allowing Samson's weakness and his wife's unfaithfulness to stir up strife and enmity between Samson and his uncircumcised friends. Freed from that entangling yoke, God could again be with him, and use even His servant's folly to punish the enemies of His people.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The road home

The chapter ends with Samson back under his father's roof. That return carries the lesson of the whole story.

Then he left the scene of so much unhappiness and "went up to his father's house," which he never should have left to settle among the Philistines. May we learn from this. If our dealings with the world have brought us painful experiences, let us hurry back to the Father's house. We never should have left it, even in thought.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Alliance. Samson went down to the Philistines to feast, not to fight, and the friendship offered him was a mask over enmity.

- Anger. Samson went home in a rage. His father-in-law read the absence as desertion and gave the bride away.

- Loss. The bond Samson thought binding meant nothing to the other side. His own best man received his wife, and her father offered another woman as if it were a small matter.

- Mercy. Commentators read the loss as God's rescue. The strife itself broke a union God had to end.

- Return. The verse leaves Samson back at his father's house. That is the place he should never have left, and the place to hurry back to after any painful tangle with the world.

Judges 15:1 · Darby

And it came to pass after a time, in the days of the wheat-harvest, that Samson visited his wife with a kid of the goats. And he said, I will go in to my wife into the chamber; but her father would not suffer him to go in.

Samson comes back to his Philistine wife with a gift in his hand, ready to take up the marriage again. Her father shuts the door. The verse raises the question the rest of the chapter answers: what happens when a man set apart to God holds on to a tie he should never have made?

The Visit and the Closed Door

Samson brings a present and asks for his wife. Her father blocks the door.

After some time Samson decided to visit his wife, and he took a young goat as a gift. She was apparently still in her father's house, and her father refused to let him go into her room. He told him he thought that Samson hated the girl, so that he had given her to his friend. Then he offered her younger sister as a substitute.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Tie Failed

Samson had married a Philistine woman. Commentators see the shut door as the natural end of such a bond.

He goes down at the time of the wheat harvest to visit his wife with a young goat, and finds that she has been taken from him. Surely no Philistine alliance is binding, even on their side, much less on the side of faith.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Offer of a Substitute

The father does not just say no. He has a replacement ready.

When Samson protests, the father-in-law answers that he thought she had been abandoned, so he had given her to a friend, and he offers another one. Philistines are always ready to do that — to offer some fresh link with themselves.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Strength Without a Judged Heart

A Nazarite was a man under a vow of separation to God. Samson kept the strength and lost the holiness. The word carnal below means ruled by your own nature.

We cannot measure the moral worth of a man of God by the greatness of his gift. Nowhere in Scripture do we find a stronger man than Samson, nor one weaker morally... Samson was a Nazarite, and the Spirit of God often came on him. But he was also a man whose heart had never been judged, so his state did not match the gift he used. Not once, from the start of his career to the end, did he hesitate to follow the path of his lusts. He went, without a struggle, wherever his heart led him. Despite the power of the Spirit, he was a carnal man. When he visited his wife with a young goat, his kindness was carnal. When the world offered him another woman, one he did not want, in exchange for the one he longed for, his anger was carnal. This is always how the world treats us, to our loss and shame, when we have wanted something from it. What it gives, after so many fine promises, has no value to the child of God and cannot satisfy him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God Breaking Off What Should Never Have Begun

Commentators read the shut door as God's hand as much as the father's.

We always carry a little of the world with us when, as children of God, we have mingled with it. But God uses this to tear us away from it completely. He makes union impossible by setting us in direct conflict with the world in the very things that had formed our connection with it. We had better have remained apart. But God must deal with us this way when union with the world becomes a habit, tolerated in the church. Think of a Nazarite married to a Philistine! God must break off a union like this by causing enmity and hostility to arise.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Our Plans and God's Purpose

Samson never gets what he came for. That failure fits a larger pattern.

God works out His ways not only through things He approves of, but also by making everything work toward the result He wants — our own faults, His discipline, the opposition of Satan and of the world. Our unfaithfulness does not disturb the ways of God... Very often, to our humiliation, our own ways come to nothing. Look at Samson, who never did take the daughter of the Philistine as his wife.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

One caution follows. What drives Samson from here on is his own grievance. He goes to take vengeance on the Philistines for a personal wrong, and one writer calls it "a mere personal vengeance" (Samuel Ridout).

Summary

- Compromise — the marriage to a Philistine was the root; this verse is only the bill arriving.

- Closed door — no bond made with the world is binding on the world's side; the man who gave Samson his wife now shuts the door on him.

- Substitute — refuse one link and the world offers another; what it gives back cannot satisfy a child of God.

- Carnal — the gift in his hand and the rage in his heart came from one unjudged heart; strength is no measure of a man.

- Purpose — Samson's plan came to nothing; God used the wreck of it to force the break Samson would never have chosen.

Judges 15:2 · Darby

And her father said, I verily thought that thou didst utterly hate her; therefore I gave her to thy companion. Is not her younger sister fairer than she? Let her, I pray thee, be thine instead of her.

Samson returns to Timnah to claim his wife. Her father meets him at the door with an excuse and a counter-offer, and both show how little an alliance with the Philistines was ever worth.

The excuse and the substitute

One commentator reads the exchange as proof that a bond like this holds on neither side:

Surely no Philistine alliance is binding, even on their side, much less on the side of faith. She is taken from him. When Samson protests, the father-in-law answers that he thought she had been abandoned, so he had given her to a friend — and he offers another one. Philistines are always ready to do that — to offer some fresh link with themselves.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The offer of the younger sister is not repentance. It is the same connection repackaged.

Blame on both sides

The father is not the only one at fault. Samson had walked out in anger at the end of the feast and stayed away at his father's house. Her father read that silence as desertion:

The girl's father seems to have taken this as desertion. So he gave his daughter to Samson's close friend, one of the thirty companions of the Philistines. Of course there was carelessness on Samson's part as well as looseness on the girl's father's part.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The companion who received her

Her father did not give her to a stranger. This man had stood at Samson's own wedding as the bridegroom's closest friend:

At first he goes to visit his wife with a young goat, not knowing what has happened. He finds she has been given to the one who had acted as his "friend" — the "friend of the bridegroom." John the Baptist later refers to this custom in his well-known words (John 3:29).

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the marriage fell apart

Samson was a Nazirite, a man set apart to God, and he had tied himself to a Philistine household. One commentator sees the break-up as God forcing apart what should never have been joined:

We always carry a little of the world with us when, as children of God, we have mingled with it. But God uses this to separate us from the world by force, and completely. He makes union impossible by setting us in direct conflict with the world in the very things that had formed our connection with it. We had better have remained apart… Think of a Nazirite married to a Philistine! God must break off a union like this by causing enmity and hostility to arise.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Lord's hand was in this affair from the start. One writer marks out carefully what that covers and what it does not:

Note this — it was not the union that was of the Lord, but the intended opposition to the Philistines: not the means, but the end. Union there could never have been. The means Samson proposed was no divine way of neutralising evil. The intention was divine, but the means were clearly human. So the marriage never takes place, while the divine desire is declared and answered in full.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Carnal kindness, carnal anger

The goat Samson brought and the rage he leaves with come from one root. A man can carry real power from God and still act out of self:

Nowhere in Scripture do we find a stronger man than Samson, nor one weaker in moral strength… When he visited his wife with a young goat, his kindness was carnal. When the world proposed giving him another woman, whom he did not want, in exchange for the one he so deeply desired, his anger was carnal. This is how the world always treats us, to our loss and shame, when we have wanted something from it. What it gives, after so many fine promises, has no value to the child of God, and cannot satisfy him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Samson's answer is revenge, and one writer weighs it against a New Testament command:

This awakened Samson's anger and he now considered that he would be blameless in harming the Philistines. He did not understand what the New Testament tells believers: "Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, 'Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.'"

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Excuse. The father claimed he thought Samson had abandoned her. Then he offered the younger sister — a fresh tie from the world to replace the broken one.

- Betrayal. Her father gave her to the friend of the bridegroom, the closest man at Samson's own wedding.

- Rupture. The alliance collapses because it could never hold. Commentators see God setting Samson against the world in the very thing that had joined him to it.

- Purpose. What came from the LORD was the conflict with the Philistines, not the marriage. The aim was divine; the method was Samson's own.

- Motive. Samson's kindness and his fury both came from self. What the world hands back can never satisfy, and revenge is not the believer's to take.

Judges 15:3 · Darby

And Samson said to them, This time I am blameless toward the Philistines, though I do them harm.

Samson has come back to Timnah with a young goat, expecting to find his wife. Her father has given her to the friend who stood beside him at the wedding. Samson answers with open war, and his first move is to claim that this time nobody can blame him.

The Broken Alliance Behind the Words

The marriage had already collapsed in the previous chapter. On his return Samson meets not only loss, but an offer to tie him to the same people again.

He goes down at wheat harvest to visit his wife with a young goat, and finds she has been taken from him. No Philistine alliance is binding, even on their side, much less on the side of faith. When Samson protests, the father-in-law says he thought she had been abandoned, so he gave her to a friend. He offers another one. Philistines are always ready to do that: offer some fresh link with themselves. Samson resents this, and now goes to take vengeance on the Philistines for this personal wrong.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Claim to Be Innocent

Samson judges his own case: the wrong done to him clears him of guilt for whatever he does next. Commentators weigh that claim against a later word of Scripture.

This awakened Samson's anger, and he now considered that he would be blameless in harming the Philistines. He did not understand what the New Testament tells believers: "Beloved, never avenge yourselves … for it is written, 'Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.'"

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God has His own purpose running through this story. Samson cannot hide behind it.

His parents, we are told, did not know that it was of the Lord that he might find an occasion against the Philistines to overthrow them. God's purposes will be accomplished despite my disobedience, but I can never use His purposes to endorse my disobedience. I cannot be a partner with God while I disobey Him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Personal Grudge or Public War?

Commentators differ on Samson's target. Some hear only a man settling a score, and they apply it to church life today.

Someone allies himself with what is not of God. Then he finds that they have broken faith with him and treated him in a very shabby way. There is the personal resentment. How often you meet people who say the church they did so much for has treated them outrageously. They worked, gave their money, their time, everything else, and met with nothing but ingratitude. The result is anger and the desire for vengeance. Many a church quarrel comes from this personal animosity, not from zeal for God's honour.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Others read the same words as a deliberate widening of the fight beyond the family that wronged him.

His anger breaks out, not as private vengeance against the woman of Timnah, but against the Philistines as a whole.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Anger Without the Spirit

Samson had taken the Nazirite vow, which set him apart to God. Commentators test what he does next against that vow, and against what the record does not say.

Was it of the Lord when he took the three hundred foxes (the word means jackals) and the firebrands to destroy the grain, the vineyards and the olive groves? We find no record that the Spirit of the Lord came upon him for this work. He acted out of revenge, because they had given his wife to another. As an Israelite under the Nazirite vow, he should never have taken her. It was anger, not a judgment commanded by the Lord.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer traces this to something deeper than one bad decision. Samson's gift and his moral state never matched.

Nowhere in Scripture do we find a stronger man than Samson, nor one weaker in moral terms. He was a Nazirite, and the Spirit of God often came upon him. But his heart had never been judged, so his state did not match the gift he used. When he visited his wife with a young goat, his kindness came from the flesh. The world then offered him another woman, whom he did not want, in exchange for the one he longed for — and his anger came from the flesh too.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God Working Through the Wreckage

None of this leaves God at a loss. The collapse of the marriage is what frees Samson for God's service.

God rescued His servant from the alliance he had formed. He did not step in directly. He let Samson's weakness and his wife's unfaithfulness stir up strife and hostility between Samson and his uncircumcised friends. Once Samson was free of that entangling yoke, God could be with him again, and use even His servant's folly to punish the enemies of His people.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Alliance — The friendship with the Philistines that made the marriage is what now makes the injury. The world always has "some fresh link with themselves" to offer.

- Excuse — "This time I shall be innocent" is Samson's own verdict, not God's. Vengeance belongs to the Lord.

- Cover — God's purpose to find an occasion against the Philistines will stand. It still never excuses disobedience.

- Motive — Commentators differ: a blow at Philistia, or a personal wound. Either way the record says nothing of the Spirit coming on him, and the anger came from the flesh.

- Overruling — God breaks the yoke Samson would not break. He uses even His servant's folly against the enemies of His people.

Judges 15:4 · Darby

And Samson went and caught three hundred jackals, and took torches, and turned tail to tail, and put a torch in the midst between the two tails.

Samson's marriage at Timnah has collapsed, and his wife now belongs to another man. His answer turns a Philistine harvest into a wall of fire, and it raises two questions: which animal did he catch, and was this God's work or his own revenge?

Foxes or Jackals?

One writer answers a proposal to read the word as bundles of wheat rather than animals.

The same word occurs in about half a dozen other passages of the Bible, and is always translated "foxes." It will hardly be argued that wheaten sheaves, great or small, spoil the vines... I do not pretend to say that jackals may not be meant, as some have thought... After all, the question between them is of small importance. You can picture the widespread fire that must have followed such a number of swift animals rushing here and there with a flaming firebrand between each pair.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer prefers "jackals," and points to how the animals travel.

Was it of the Lord when he took the 300 foxes and the firebrands to destroy the grain, the vineyards and olive groves? They were jackals, to be exact. It would have been hard work to catch 300 foxes, for they go alone, but jackals go in packs. We find that there is no record that the Spirit of the Lord came upon him for this work.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Silence in the Text

Elsewhere in Samson's story the record notes that the Spirit of the LORD came on him. Here that note is missing. One writer explains what the phrase signals when it does appear.

One expression occurs again and again in these chapters: "The Spirit of the LORD came upon him" (Judges 13:25; 14:6, 19; 15:14). When we see these words, we can be sure that the conflict is according to God, with nothing mixed in... we cannot estimate the moral worth of a man of God by the greatness of his gift. Nowhere in Scripture do we find a stronger man than Samson, nor one weaker morally.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Revenge Dressed as Warfare

Samson tells himself he is now in the clear. One writer measures that reasoning against a later command.

But this made Samson angry. He now reckoned that he would be blameless in harming the Philistines. He did not understand the New Testament instruction to believers, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord" (Rom. 12:19)... This of course was only personal revenge on Samson's part. No Philistines were killed, but their goods destroyed. Samson in this case did not at all consider the glory of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Creature He Chose

Samson was a Nazirite — a man under a vow that set him apart to God. One writer looks at the animal he chose and sees a picture of what an angry man reaches for.

He is angry because of the way he himself was treated, so he goes and takes jackals. That is a strange thing for a Nazirite to be tampering with. The jackal is the most unclean beast that roams around Palestine. It feeds on carrion, and it hides the bones it preys on in the earth until it is ready to renew its rotten meal. It is a striking picture of the flesh, which feeds on decay, on carrion, on corruption. He burned up grain, vineyards and olive orchards, but in the land these things stand for spiritual blessings. Why not drive out the Philistine and enjoy them? Why burn them up and leave the enemy?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Torch in the Hand, or Torch on a Tail

An earlier judge also used fire, and the comparison exposes what Samson did with his.

Could you imagine Jephthah, even with all his harshness, turning jackals loose among the enemy? Does that look anything like Gideon? He held his torch in his hand, and did not use it to inflame the flesh. He held it simply to maintain a testimony... Let us beware of trying to use the flesh against one another. Beware of stirring up and inflaming what feeds on corruption. Suppose you tell a whispered word that you know will stir up resentment and make enmity. It seems to me that you are then getting ready to put the torch to a jackal and turn it loose.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God Still Working Through It

The wrong motive did not stop God from using the outcome against Israel's oppressors.

His marriage to a woman of Timnah was "of the Lord" in this sense. In the ways of God it became an occasion against the Philistines, the people he had allied himself with.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — Commentators differ on the animal. One says the term is always rendered "foxes"; another prefers "jackals" because jackals move in packs. One writer calls the question a small one.

- Silence — Elsewhere the record says the Spirit of the LORD came on Samson. Here it says nothing of the kind.

- Motive — Samson counted himself blameless. But the raid destroyed property, killed no Philistine, and left God's glory out of view.

- Creature — The jackal feeds on carrion, and a man set apart to God had no business touching it. It pictures the flesh, and the fire tied to it burned grain, vines and olives while the enemy stood.

- Warning — Gideon carried his torch as testimony; Samson tied his to a jackal. A whispered word that stirs resentment lights the same fuse. Yet God still turned the whole affair against the Philistines.

Judges 15:5 · Darby

And he set the torches on fire, and let [them] run into the standing corn of the Philistines, and burnt up both the shocks, and also the standing corn, and the olive gardens.

Samson's answer to losing his wife was not a raid on soldiers but a fire let loose in the fields of Philistia at harvest time. Two questions follow: what drove a man set apart to God to fight this way, and what did his fire destroy?

What Samson actually did

The Hebrew word behind "foxes" is read by commentators as jackals, and the difference matters practically — foxes are solitary, jackals run in packs, so three hundred could be taken. One writer also notes what is missing from the record:

Was it of the Lord when he took the 300 foxes (literally, jackals; it would have been hard work to catch 300 foxes, for they go alone, but jackals go in packs) and the firebrands to destroy the grain, the vineyards and olive groves? We find that there is no record that the Spirit of the Lord came upon him for this work... It was anger, not a judgment commanded by the Lord. And by touching the jackal, an unclean beast, he had defiled himself.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The timing made the damage enormous

The fire was set when the crops were ripe and partly cut, and the Philistines' response shows how much they feared the man who lit it:

He catches three hundred jackals and joins them in pairs by the tails, with a lighted torch between the tails. Then he lets the terrified animals go into the grainfields and olive groves, just at the time of harvest. The destruction must have been immense. Samson had already become so terrifying that the Philistines do not take revenge on him, their Israelite enemy. Instead they take cowardly vengeance on those who had provoked his anger, and burn the woman of Timnah and her father with fire.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Revenge, not God's glory

Samson had a real grievance. One writer weighs his answer to it against a New Testament command:

He did not understand the New Testament instruction to believers, "Never avenge yourselves... for it is written, 'Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord'" (Rom. 12:19)... This burned up the standing grain and the stacked grain that had already been cut, and it spread into the vineyards and olive groves. This of course was only personal revenge on Samson's part. No Philistines were killed, but their goods destroyed. Samson in this case did not at all consider the glory of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Power and character are not the same thing. Another writer applies that to Samson:

Samson was a Nazarite, and the Spirit of God often came on him. But he was also a man who had never judged his own heart. His state did not match the gift he exercised... When he visited his wife with a young goat, his kindness was carnal. When the world offered him another woman he did not want, in place of the one he longed for, his anger was carnal.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

A Nazarite handling unclean animals

A Nazarite was a man under a vow of separation to God. The animal Samson chose matters:

He goes and takes jackals — a strange thing for a Nazarite to be tampering with. It is the uncleanest beast that roams around Palestine. It feeds on carrion, and hides the bones of its prey in the earth until it is ready to renew its rotten meal. It is a striking picture of the flesh, which feeds on rottenness, on carrion, on corruption... He is not caring what they do, and I don't read that he killed a single Philistine by doing it. He burnt up grain, he burnt up vineyards, he burnt up olive orchards, but in the land these things stand for spiritual blessings... Why not drive out the Philistine and enjoy the grain, the olives and the vineyards? Why burn them up and leave the enemy?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the fire consumed

Grain, vines and olives are the three staples of the land — the produce of field, vineyard and orchard that stood for God's blessing on His people. That is why writers read this destruction as a warning about quarrels among believers:

How often God's people act in the same way, in an undignified manner, biting and devouring each other... Whenever an unchristlike spirit shows itself among the children of God — the spirit of malice, envy and vainglory — it robs the people of God of their joy and peace.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same writer who compared the jackal to the flesh presses the point into everyday speech:

Let us beware of fighting with jackals, let us beware of trying to use the flesh against one another. Beware of stirring up and inflaming that which feeds on corruption. If you tell a whispered word that you know is going to stir up resentment, to make enmity, it seems to me that you are getting ready to put the torch to a jackal and turn it loose.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God overruling the mess

None of this frustrates God's purpose. The Philistines had wronged Samson, and their own act of judgment on his wife's family fell back on their heads:

Now freed from that entangling alliance, Samson could have God with him again, and God could use even His servant's folly to punish the enemies of His people. The world may succeed in luring the servants of God away from their steadfastness, but whenever it does so, it brings itself under God's just judgment.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Motive — Samson lit the fire over a private grievance, and no record says the Spirit of the LORD came on him for it.

- Method — a man separated to God harnessed the unclean scavenger, a picture of using the flesh as a weapon.

- Measure — the fire destroyed property at harvest and killed no Philistine. Samson spent his strength and won nothing for God.

- Fallout — grain, vines and olives picture spiritual blessing. Quarrels among God's people burn that blessing and cost them their joy and peace.

- Overruling — God still brought the Philistines under judgment. He can use a servant's folly, but that never excuses it.

Judges 15:6 · Darby

And the Philistines said, Who has done this? And they answered, Samson, the son-in-law of the Timnite, because he took his wife and gave her to his companion. And the Philistines came up, and burned her and her father with fire.

Samson's raid has left huge destruction behind it, and the Philistines turn not on him but on the woman and her father. Their answer to "Who has done this?" sends them against their own people, and puts her in the very fire she had betrayed Samson to avoid.

The Fate She Betrayed Him to Escape

Earlier the Philistines had threatened the woman and her father's house with ruin unless she betrayed Samson. She gave in, and the threat found her anyway.

The second exploit, brought on by Samson's wife being given to his friend, stirs the Philistines to greater violence. They take their revenge, but not on Samson. They punish the one who had betrayed him, and her father's house, which they burn with fire. This was the very fate she had so feared. The threat of it had made her act unfaithfully to Samson. This teaches us a lesson. Whatever we try to escape from by unbelief and unrighteousness is sure to be our end after all. We may escape it for a moment, but our escape is, in the end, the sure road to it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

She faced a choice between two loyalties. One writer reads it as fear of her own people winning out over her devotion to Samson.

Her devotion to him dissolves before the fear of her own people, who threaten her with ruin unless she betrays him. If she had clung to him in true devotion, as she should have, he would surely have saved her from the disaster she dreaded. But failing to do that, she betrays and compromises the one she should have suffered for.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

God's Righteousness Seen Even Among Enemies

Who carried out the sentence? Not Samson, and not Israel, but the Philistines themselves. One writer sees God's own character at work in that.

This again leads the Philistines to take bitter revenge on the people of Timnath who had treated him so badly. In the end the very fate fell on them that the woman had first committed the basest treachery to escape. (Compare Judges 14:15 with Judges 15:6.) Now it was that God worked for His glory. He rescued failing Samson from the direct consequences of his sinful association. But He also repaid treachery, and He did it by the hands of their own people. For "the righteous Lord loves righteousness."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer finds this encouraging, because God kept to His own character in a setting that was entirely dark.

We can all understand righteousness where God clearly approves the ground. But is it not also strengthening to our hearts to find that God knows how to give effect to His principles even where everything was dark and faulty? Even now, while everything is out of order and His enemy is in power, He holds to His own character, owning and using all He can.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why They Struck Their Own

The Philistines had a clear target and chose an easier one. Fear explains the swerve.

The destruction must have been immense. The fear of Samson had already grown so great that they did not take revenge on their Israelite enemy. Instead they took cowardly revenge on those who had provoked his anger, and burned the Timnite woman and her father with fire. But this does the very opposite of calming him. He strikes them hip and thigh with a great slaughter.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The verse calls the new husband Samson's "companion." One writer explains the role that man had held.

Samson finds that his wife has been given to the one who had acted as his "friend" — the "friend of the bridegroom." John the Baptist later refers to this custom (John 3:29).

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Revenge in Place of Repair

Nobody in this chapter asks how to mend the trouble. Each side only asks how to hit back.

The Philistines wanted to know who was responsible for this destruction. They learned that Samson had done it, because his father-in-law had given his wife to another man. So they came and burned both the girl and her father to death. People generally do not stop to think what might help in a bad situation; they only want revenge in some way.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Samson answers in the same spirit. One writer admits the mixture in it, and still sees God at work underneath.

Samson found in their vengeance a fresh opportunity for doing the work of God. Here again we find much mixture: "Yet will I be avenged of you," and it is not added that the Spirit of Jehovah came upon him. But if He did not openly appear, God was behind the scene, and despite everything, it was a deliverance for the people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear. The Philistines threatened her and her father's house, and she betrayed Samson to escape it. Fear, not love, decided her course.

- Flight. She ran from the fire by being unfaithful. What we try to escape through unbelief and unrighteousness becomes the very road to it.

- Fire. The threat of Judges 14:15 lands in Judges 15:6. The escape lasted only a moment.

- Fairness. God dealt with treachery through the hands of her own people. He holds to His own character even where the whole setting is dark and faulty.

- Fury. Burning her did not calm Samson; it fed him. Revenge never closes an account; it opens the next one.

Judges 15:7 · Darby

And Samson said to them, If ye act thus, for a certainty I will avenge myself on you, and then I will cease.

Samson speaks after the Philistines burned his wife and her father to death, paying him back for the fire he had set in their fields. His vow — revenge, and then a stop — raises the question of his whole life: was he delivering Israel, or settling a private quarrel that God turned to good for His people?

The provocation

The Philistines did not strike back at Samson himself. One writer traces where their vengeance fell instead, and what it left Samson free to claim.

The second exploit came after Samson's wife was given to his friend. It stirs the Philistines to greater violence. They take out their vengeance not on Samson, but on the one who had betrayed him and on her father's house, which they burn with fire. This was the very fate she had feared, and the threat of it had made her act unfaithfully to Samson. This teaches us a lesson. Whatever we try to escape by unbelief and unrighteousness is sure to be our doom in the end. We may escape it for a moment, but our escape is, after all, the sure road to it. This act, however, increases Samson's right of vengeance, and we read that he "struck them hip and thigh with a great blow."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Eyes finally opened

Samson had wanted this marriage. One writer explains how God broke it off, and what Samson saw once it was gone.

God rescued His servant from the alliance he had made. He did not do this by any active intervention. He allowed Samson's weakness and his wife's unfaithfulness to stir up strife and hostility between Samson and his uncircumcised friends. Samson was now free from this entangling yoke. So God could again be with him, and use even His servant's folly to punish the enemies of His people. The world may succeed in luring the servants of God away from their steadfastness. But whenever it does, it brings itself under God's just judgment. … Samson was no longer blinded by his natural affections. He now saw the real character of the Philistines.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A mixture of motives

The text does not say the Spirit of the Lord came on Samson here, as it does elsewhere in his story. One writer weighs that silence.

Samson found in their vengeance (v. 7) a fresh opportunity for doing the work of God. Here again we find much mixture: "I swear I will be avenged on you," and it is not added that the Spirit of Jehovah came upon him. But if He did not openly appear, God was behind the scene, and despite everything it was a deliverance for the people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

When we settle our own scores

The wrong done was real. But Samson set the measure of the payback himself, and one writer does the arithmetic.

Samson, however, was not happy that his wife and her father had been murdered, and it was his turn again to take revenge (v. 7). He attacked the Philistines with a great slaughter (v. 8). If we take judgment into our own hands we will very likely be unfair. We will go much farther in paying back in a wrong way than the wrong deserved. The Philistines had killed two people. Samson killed a great many! The Lord used this, because the Philistines were oppressing Israel. But Samson's motives were not for God's glory. They were for his own advantage.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Open conflict, at last

Until now Samson's fights with the Philistines had been private. One writer marks the change, and measures what came before it.

Then, at last, Samson takes open and public ground. He now strikes the Philistines hip and thigh, and there is a great slaughter. But how long it has been before he gets into direct and open conflict! How much of all this has been purely idle and beneath the dignity of a servant of God! It was a strange display of strength. That strength was superhuman, yet it did not seem to suggest divine power.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Provocation. The Philistines took their own revenge, and it fell on the woman who had betrayed Samson. What she tried to escape by unfaithfulness became her end.

- Clarity. Losing the marriage opened Samson's eyes to the real character of the Philistines. God freed him from that yoke, and then used even his folly against the enemies of His people.

- Mixture. Nothing is said of the Spirit coming on him here. Yet God stayed behind the scene and made it a deliverance for Israel.

- Excess. The Philistines killed two. Samson killed a great many. Judgment in our own hands goes far past the wrong.

- Turning point. From this blow Samson stands in open conflict at last. One writer still asks how much of his earlier strength ever suggested divine power.

Judges 15:8 · Darby

And he smote them hip and thigh with a great slaughter. And he went down and dwelt in the cleft of the cliff Etam.

The Philistines had burned Samson's wife and her father, and this verse is his answer. It moves twice — a great slaughter, then a retreat to a rock — and commentators read both as turning points.

Open Conflict at Last

One writer marks this verse as the turning point, and regrets how long it took to arrive:

The Philistines pay Samson's wife and his father-in-law back for all this by going and burning her and her father with fire. Then, at last, Samson takes open, public ground. He strikes the Philistines hip and thigh, and there is a great slaughter. But how long it has taken him to get into direct, open conflict. And how much in all this strange display of strength was simply idle and beneath the dignity of a servant of God — strength that was superhuman, yet did not seem to suggest divine power.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Freed From the Alliance

Samson had insisted on a Philistine wife. One writer traces how God undid that marriage without stepping in directly:

But God rescued His servant from the alliance he had made. He did not step in directly. He allowed Samson's weakness and his wife's unfaithfulness to stir up strife and hatred between Samson and his Philistine friends. Freed from that entangling yoke, God could be with him again, and use even His servant's folly to punish the enemies of His people. The world may succeed in luring the servants of God away from their steadfastness. But whenever it does, it brings God's just judgment on itself... Samson was no longer blinded by his natural affections, and now he saw the Philistines for what they really were.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Mixed Motives, Real Deliverance

The words just before the blow are personal: Samson says he will be avenged. One writer weighs that against the good that came out of it:

Samson found in their revenge (v. 7) a fresh opportunity for doing the work of God. Here again we find much mixture: "I will be avenged on you." And the text does not add that the Spirit of the LORD came upon him. But if He did not appear openly, God was behind the scene, and, despite everything, it was a deliverance for the people.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Rock Etam

The older wording — dwelling "in the top of the rock" — is misleading. A reference work corrects it:

A place in Judah where Samson lived for a short time (Judges 15:8, 11). The older English translation reads unclearly, "he went down and dwelt in the top of the rock Etam." It is better translated "dwelt in the cleft of the rock Etam."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Ridout reads the rock as a picture of Christ, and Samson's move into it as the point where the account starts to improve:

"The rock badgers are a people not mighty, yet they make their homes in the cliffs." And when he takes the place of dwelling in the rock, which suggests the thought of Christ and of hiding in Him, you may expect something more now than what we have had so far, and so you will find it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

(The older translation he quoted reads, "The coneys be a feeble folk, but their dwelling is in the rock.")

The Price of Breaking With the Enemy

The rock did not bring peace. One writer finds in what follows a picture of Israel at its lowest:

After this we see the Philistines suffering the severest punishment from Samson, who "struck them hip and thigh with a great blow, and he went down and stayed in the cleft of the rock of Etam." There he meets a new trial, and it shows us the state of Israel in the most painful light. Can we go any lower, whether we look at the people of God or at the last deliverer in the book of Judges? ... But if God's people have come into subjection to the world, no one is so heartless towards — if not bitter against — the man who breaks completely with the enemy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rossier draws the same line forward to the reader:

When a believer takes sides with God against the world, he is bound to find himself alone, and Samson understood this. Those who would be witnesses for Christ in a day of ruin must expect to be set aside — and, sadly, set aside by the people of God.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Entanglement — Samson's Philistine marriage held him back. God used the enemy's own cruelty to break the tie. Only then did Samson see the Philistines for what they were.

- Delay — writers regret how long he took to reach open conflict. His superhuman strength had gone on things beneath a servant of God.

- Mixture — the Spirit is not named here, and the motive is revenge. Yet God stood behind the scene, and the result was a deliverance for His people.

- Rock — better read as the cleft of the rock, a place of shelter. Ridout sees Samson's move there as the point where the account turns upward.

- Isolation — the man who breaks with the world must expect to stand alone, and God's own people may set him aside first.

Judges 15:9 · Darby

And the Philistines went up, and encamped in Judah, and spread themselves in Lehi.

Samson has withdrawn to the rock Etam, and now a Philistine army marches into Israel and camps at Lehi. One man's refusal to compromise has brought on a national invasion — and it falls on Judah, the tribe that should have welcomed its deliverer.

Why the enemy moved

What brought their army up was one man they could not buy:

The next important event in Samson's history was that the Philistines tried to make him a prisoner. They found that he would make no compromise with them. He was an open and determined foe, so they "came up and encamped in Judah and made a raid on Lehi." … Their aim was to bind the Nazarite and so make him helpless.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

(A Nazarite is someone set apart to God by a special vow.)

Samson had already pulled back from their territory. Distance did not cool them:

Samson had made himself an outlaw. He had now retired from conflict — retreated, as it were, from the territory of the Philistines — and had taken his place among the men of Judah. Even so, they are bound to have their revenge. They were far from being overcome by what he had done; they press on, and must have his blood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The name of the place

"Lehi" means jaw-bone. The name is in the text before the jaw-bone appears in the story:

The blows he has inflicted have now thoroughly roused the Philistines. They invade Judah with an army, and camp in Lehi. The place takes its name ahead of the event, from the "jaw" which he uses to defeat them; and it becomes to them a place of crushing defeat.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Commentators differ on whether the place already carried that name:

Whether the place had this name before the victory or after is not clear. Samson afterwards called it Ramath-lehi, the "hill of the jaw-bone."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Camped in Judah

The army camped in Judah, the royal tribe, whose name means praise. See how low its people had sunk:

Judah! is this the tribe for the praise of Jehovah? is this the tribe that men praise? Did the Philistines only have to call, and at once three thousand men stood willing and prompt to betray the champion of Israel? … Not only were they in slavery, but content to be slaves, yes, traitors. Could a people sink lower in human things?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Worse still, they did not want rescue at all:

Not only does Israel no longer cry to Jehovah, but they do not wish to be delivered. The man of God, their rightful deliverer, was a burden to them. … By identifying themselves with the enemy who enslaved them, Judah was no longer Judah. They had morally exchanged their name for that of the Philistines.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A pattern that repeats

Comfort with the world turns the one who stands apart into a problem. The same pattern runs on to the trial of Jesus:

When God's people become worldly and corrupt, they cannot bear those who are really separate. What they want, in this condition, is ease and prosperity; and to get it they must avoid conflict and buy peace at any price. So they must sacrifice the Samsons to win the enemy's goodwill. We see this most fully when the Jews urged Pilate to condemn our blessed Lord and Saviour.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Where Samson was standing

Samson himself was above them all, on the rock. Where he stood decided the outcome:

But Samson stayed at the top of the rock Etam. … The top of the rock is clearly the place from which to get the victory. It stands for stability and strength; for what is immovable, and against which the storms beat in vain. Our Lord has become a rock to us. He has laid a foundation broad and deep, and no assault or storm can shake that foundation. He who builds on it is safe forever.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Separation was also what made him useful to Israel:

Just as he lived in separation from the Philistines, in open conflict with them, he had power to judge the people of God. He could be no real judge for them when he was down allying himself with his enemies.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Refuse — the invasion came because Samson "would make no compromise with them." A life the enemy cannot buy, the enemy must attack.

- Revenge — retreat did not end it: "they press on, and must have his blood." Withdrawal buys no peace.

- Lehi — the camp is named "jaw-bone" before the jaw-bone is used: their chosen battlefield "becomes to them a place of crushing defeat."

- Judah — the enemy camps in the royal tribe and finds allies there. A people "content to be slaves" hand over their own deliverer, as Judah later handed over Christ.

- Rock — Samson's standing ground answers it all. "The top of the rock is clearly the place from which to get the victory," and only in separation could he judge Israel at all.

Judges 15:10 · Darby

And the men of Judah said, Why are ye come up against us? And they said, To bind Samson are we come up, to do to him as he has done to us.

The Philistine army camps inside Judah, and Judah's first reaction is not to fight but to ask why. The answer names one man and one purpose — and what God's own people then do with that answer is the real test of this chapter.

The Aim: Bind the Nazarite

The Philistines do not say they have come to kill Samson. They have come to bind him. One writer sees the enemy's whole strategy in that one word:

The next important event in Samson's history came when the Philistines tried to take him prisoner. They found that he would make no compromise with them. He was an open and determined foe. To bind the Nazarite and so make him helpless was their object.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

A Nazarite was a person set apart to God.

"As He Did to Us"

The second half of their answer is a demand for payback. Distance settles nothing with an enemy set on revenge:

Samson had made himself an outlaw. He had now retired from the conflict and pulled back, as it were, from Philistine territory, and had taken his place among the men of Judah. Still they are determined to have their revenge. They were far from being beaten by what he had done; they press on, and must have his blood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Judah Speaks Like a Philistine

Notice who says "us" in this verse, and who says it in the next. One commentator sets those two sentences side by side and weighs how far Judah has fallen:

Nowhere in the book of Judges do we find a lower moral state than this. Israel no longer cries to Jehovah; worse than that, they do not want to be delivered. The man of God, their rightful deliverer, was a burden to them. The Philistines said: "We have come up ... to do to him as he did to us" (v. 10). Judah said: "What is this that you have done to us?" (v. 11). By identifying themselves with the enemy who enslaved them, Judah was no longer Judah. In moral terms they had traded their own name for the name of the Philistines. Their fellowship with the enemy was complete. Both were enemies of the testimony. Judah was far the worse: they preferred slavery to the unhindered power of the Spirit of God, and Samson was the instrument of that power.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer adds that this is the natural cost of standing with God against the world:

When a believer takes sides with God against the world, he is bound to find himself alone. Samson understood this. Those who would be witnesses for Christ in a day of ruin must expect to be pushed aside — and sadly, it is the people of God who push them aside.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Shame of the Royal Tribe

Judah was the worthiest tribe of all, the tribe men praised. That makes the speed of their surrender the sharpest detail here:

Judah! is this the tribe for the praise of Jehovah? is this the tribe that men praise? At the Philistine's call, could three thousand men step forward so willing and prompt to betray the champion of Israel? Three thousand men of Judah! Three thousand Philistines one could understand. But how dreadful the state of Israel had become. Three thousand men of the worthiest tribe obeyed the Philistines like this. They joined against the strong deliverer, to hand him over, bound a prisoner, to the mercy of those who hated him and despised them! Not only were they in slavery, but content to be slaves — yes, traitors.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Peace Bought at Any Price

Samson was among his own people when the enemy arrived. Why did no one stand with him?

Samson was now in the middle of the chosen people, and surely he might count on their help and support. Far from it. They had accepted the rule of their enemies and forgotten their true position. They saw the Nazarite as a disturber of their peace. When God's people become worldly and corrupt, they cannot put up with those who are truly separate. In that condition they want ease and prosperity. To get it, they avoid conflict and buy peace at any price. So they sacrifice the Samsons to win the good will of the enemy.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A Shadow of a Later Handing Over

One writer sees the outline of a far greater betrayal in what Judah did here:

So Samson, through God's mysterious ways, was cut off from his own people. They handed him over. Later the people of Judah handed over the Lord Jesus in the same way — the true Nazarite, who came to save them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Aim — The enemy does not ask for Samson's life, only for his ropes. A man who will not compromise must be made helpless.

- Motive — Behind the demand is revenge. Samson's retreat did not satisfy them; they press on and must have his blood.

- Drift — Judah now says "us" the way the Philistines say it. By siding with their oppressors, they traded their own name for the enemy's.

- Cost — Worldly people cannot tolerate the truly separate. They want ease, so they avoid conflict and sacrifice the deliverer to buy the enemy's goodwill.

- Shadow — Judah hands over its own deliverer. Later, Judah handed over the Lord Jesus, the true Nazarite who came to save them.

Judges 15:11 · Darby

Then three thousand men of Judah went down to the cleft of the cliff Etam, and said to Samson, Knowest thou not that the Philistines rule over us? And what is this that thou hast done to us? And he said to them, As they did to me, so have I done to them.

Samson has attacked the Philistines and withdrawn to the cleft of the rock Etam. Now three thousand of his own countrymen climb that rock — not to thank their deliverer, but to scold him and hand him over.

Judah's Shame

The tribe that should have led Israel hands its deliverer to the enemy. One writer dwells on the number:

Judah! Is this the tribe for the praise of Jehovah? Could the Philistines call up three thousand men so willing and quick to betray the champion of Israel? Three thousand men of Judah! One could understand three thousand men of the Philistines. But how deplorable was the state of Israel, when three thousand men of the worthiest tribe obeyed the Philistines like this! They joined against the strong deliverer to hand him over, bound as a prisoner, to the mercy of those who hated him and despised them! Is it they who say to Samson, "Do you not know that the Philistines are rulers over us?" Not only were they in slavery, but content to be slaves — yes, traitors.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Slavery Preferred

Judah does not deny the oppression. They state it as a fact they have no wish to change.

Samson's testimony disturbed the quiet slavery of the three thousand men of Judah. So they agree to help the world that wants to get rid of him. They would rather carry the Philistine yoke than face the difficulties and risks that this testimony brings. Nowhere in the book of Judges do we find a lower moral state than this. Not only does Israel no longer cry to Jehovah; they do not even want to be delivered. The man of God, their rightful deliverer, was a burden to them.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The same writer draws out what that alliance made of them:

By joining themselves like this to the enemy who enslaved them, Judah was no longer Judah. In moral terms they traded their name for that of the Philistines. Their fellowship with the Philistines was complete. Both were enemies of the testimony. But Judah was far worse. They preferred slavery to the unhindered power of the Spirit of God, and Samson was the instrument of that power.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Troublemaker

Judah's question is the protest of people whose comfort has been disturbed. One writer hears the same protest whenever someone raises a warning voice:

If any man raises a voice of warning against the evil doctrines or worldly practices all around us, people see him as a troublemaker. They must shut his mouth. They must bind him and hold him back. They will tell him that it is wrong to go to extremes, and that moderation is the great thing to aim at. But by that standard, being lukewarm is right and fire stands condemned, because fire is far too hot.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Samson's Defence

Samson answers that he only paid the Philistines back in kind. One writer weighs that payback, and the rock Samson withdrew to:

Samson was not happy that his wife and her father had been murdered, and it was his turn again to take revenge. He attacked the Philistines with a great slaughter. If we take judgment into our own hands we will very likely be unfair, going much further in paying back in a wrong way than the wrong deserved. The Philistines had killed two people. Samson killed a great many! The Lord used this, because the Philistines were oppressing Israel. But Samson was not acting for God's glory. He was acting for his own advantage... At this time Samson went to dwell in the cleft of a rock, certainly a better place than among the Philistines, because this speaks of dwelling in Christ.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Bound Without Resisting

The lowest moment in this scene is also the most beautiful:

Things are at the lowest point with him, while on the other hand the grace on his part is beautiful. He knows God has given him strength. Still, he cannot use it against the people he is called to deliver. He quietly lets them bind him and hand him over to the Philistines. Here Judah, the lion tribe, sinks to the lowest humiliation.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Delivered Up By His Own

One writer sees in this betrayal the shadow of a later one:

Judah was the tribe that Shiloh would come from. Yet Judah showed the same weakness of godly principle toward Samson that marked them later, when they handed the Lord Jesus over to Pilate... Samson is like Him here, though at a moral distance beyond measure — Him of whom it is said, "He came to his own, and his own people did not receive him."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Bondage — Judah treats Philistine rule as settled. They were slaves, and content to be slaves.

- Blame — Bondage turns the rescuer into the offender. The man who disturbs their peace is the one they question.

- Betrayal — Three thousand men of the royal tribe act as the enemy's police. One writer calls it the lowest moral point in the book of Judges.

- Binding — Samson will not turn his strength on his own people. The strongest man in Israel quietly lets them tie him up.

- Behind it all — Samson's motives were mixed, yet God used his blows against the oppressor. A deliverer handed over by his own people points on to Christ, who came to His own, and His own people did not receive Him.

Judges 15:12 · Darby

And they said to him, We are come down to bind thee, that we may give thee into the hand of the Philistines. And Samson said to them, Swear to me that ye will not fall on me yourselves.

The Philistines camp in Judah. Judah's answer is not an army but three thousand men sent to tie up their own deliverer and hand him over. Samson does not resist. He asks only that they will not strike him down themselves.

Judah's Surrender

One writer places this moment at the lowest point in the whole book:

The three thousand men of Judah, whose quiet servitude was disturbed by Samson's testimony, agree to help the world that wants to get rid of him… Nowhere in the book of Judges do we find a lower moral state than this. Not only does Israel no longer cry to the Lord, they do not wish to be delivered. The man of God, their rightful deliverer, was a burden to them… By identifying themselves with the enemy who enslaved them, Judah was no longer Judah. In character they had exchanged their own name for that of the Philistines.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Separation Becomes An Offense

Why would his own nation arrest its rescuer? One writer traces it to what a comfortable people want most:

They had accepted the rule of their enemies and forgotten their true position. So they treated the Nazirite as a disturber of their peace, and agreed to hand him over to the Philistines. When God's people become worldly and corrupt, they cannot put up with those who are really separate. What they want, in that condition, is ease and prosperity. To get it they must avoid conflict and buy peace at any price. So they must sacrifice the Samsons to win the goodwill of the enemy.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A Nazirite was a man set apart to God by a special vow.

A Shadow Of Christ

Judah was the tribe the Messiah would come from. One writer sees in Judah's act here a rehearsal of a far darker day:

Judah was the tribe from which Shiloh should come. Yet Judah showed him the same weakness of godly principle that later marked them when they handed the Lord Jesus over to Pilate… What a trying moment for Samson! His own people, for whom he had fought, valued nothing he did. How like Him of whom it is said, "He came to his own, and his own people did not receive him" — though Samson stands at an untold moral distance below Him. What special sorrow the true servant must bear from the very people he serves most earnestly and perfectly!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Samson's One Condition

He asks one thing, and it is not rescue. One writer sees a man who will not break with his own people, even as they betray him:

Samson says to the men of Judah, I will only ask you one thing. You will not kill me, will you? This is the only bright gleam in his whole history. No, they say, we will not kill you, we will hand you over to the Philistines. He can meet them. He is not afraid of them. What matters is the vital link with his own people, the people of God. If that link is kept, and they do not cut him off, spiritually speaking, he will meet the Philistine.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One writer points to the restraint behind that request:

In the power of the strength and the gentleness of God, he will not touch his own people, however ungracious they are to him. So he makes them promise solemnly that they will not fall on him themselves.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

New Ropes That Could Not Hold

Samson let them tie him up. One writer reads the scene as God's people restraining the very power sent to free them:

Samson allowed them to bind him, and this finds its counterpart in the history of Christendom. The people of God have treated the Holy Spirit much as Judah treated Samson. His power disturbed them. They did not want the liberty of the Spirit, so they have hindered His action. They have tied Him up, as it were, with their new methods — like the new cords with which Judah bound their liberator, while saying to him all the time, "We will surely not kill you." Samson could have acted very differently. These worthless fetters were to him like so many spiders' webs, as he proved later.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The ropes held only as long as there was no fight.

So they bind him with the ropes, which suggest regulations to hold him down, and hand him over safe enough to the Philistines, as they think. But when he comes face to face with the enemy, faith stirs itself. These new ropes, the regulations his own people put on him, snap like tow touched by fire. They have no power to hold him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where The Strength Lay

Being tied up cost Samson nothing, because his strength was never his own.

But at a given moment, the power of the Spirit bursts every bond… Then God made use of a bone thrown away in the fields, the worthless jawbone of a donkey, to win a striking victory… Such instruments are we in the hands of the Spirit of God (see 1 Cor. 1:27-29), yet it pleases the Lord to link our names with His victory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Bondage accepted — Judah's problem was not Philistine power. It was Philistine rule they had stopped resenting. They no longer wanted rescue.

- Deliverer resented — a people who settle for ease treat the separated man as the threat. They buy their peace by handing him over.

- Betrayal foreshadowed — the tribe that handed Samson over later handed Jesus to Pilate. A servant's sharpest sorrow comes from the people he serves.

- Bonds permitted — Samson let them tie him and asked only that his own people not strike him. The restraint was theirs; so was the shame.

- Power released — face to face with the enemy, the new ropes snapped like tow in a fire. No rope of man's making can hold the strength God gives.

Judges 15:13 · Darby

And they spoke to him, saying, No; but we will bind thee fast, and deliver thee into their hand; but we certainly shall not put thee to death. And they bound him with two new cords, and brought him up from the cliff.

The Philistines did not need to capture Israel's deliverer — his own tribe did it for them. Two questions follow: how did God's people sink to arresting their rescuer, and why did Samson let them?

Judah Hands Over Its Own Champion

The men who came to bind Samson were from Judah, the tribe whose name means praise. One writer cannot get past the number, or the errand.

Judah! Is this the tribe for the praise of Jehovah? Is this the tribe that men praise? Were there three thousand men, at the Philistines' call, so willing and prompt to betray the champion of Israel? Three thousand men of Judah! Three thousand men of the Philistines one could understand. But what a dreadful state Israel had come to! Three thousand men of the worthiest tribe obeyed the Philistines like this. They joined against the strong deliverer to hand him over, bound as a prisoner, to the mercy of those who hated him and despised them!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Behind the arrest lies something worse than fear.

Samson's testimony disturbed the quiet servitude of the three thousand men of Judah. So they agree to help the world that wants to get rid of him. They prefer the yoke of the Philistines to the difficulties and risks that come from this testimony. Nowhere in the book of Judges do we find a lower moral state than this. Not only does Israel no longer cry to Jehovah, but they do not wish to be delivered. The man of God, their rightful deliverer, was a burden to them. By siding with the enemy who enslaved them, Judah was no longer Judah. They morally traded their name for that of the Philistines. Both were enemies of the testimony, though Judah was far the worse. Judah preferred slavery to the unhindered power of the Spirit of God, of which Samson was the instrument.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Strength That Submits

Samson could have scattered them. One writer finds beauty in the fact that he did not.

Things are now at their lowest point with him. On the other hand, the grace he shows is beautiful. He knows the strength God has given him. Yet he cannot use it against the people he is called to deliver. He quietly submits to being bound and handed over to the Philistines. Judah, the lion-tribe, stands here in deepest humiliation.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The One Condition He Asked

Samson asked one thing of them. One writer finds in it the single link still holding deliverer and people together.

Samson says to the men of Judah, I will only ask you one thing. You will not kill me, will you? This is the only bright gleam in his whole history. No, they say, we will not kill you, we will hand you over to the Philistines. He can meet them. He is not afraid of them. What he needs is that the vital link with his own people holds. As long as they will not cut him off, spiritually speaking, he will face the Philistine.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Two New Ropes

Judah tied their own deliverer with new cords. One writer turns those cords into a picture of how God's people can treat the Spirit among them.

The people of God have acted towards the Holy Spirit much as Judah did to Samson. His power disturbed them. They did not want the liberty of the Spirit, so they have hindered His action. They have tied Him down, as it were, with their new methods. These are like the new cords with which Judah bound their liberator. All the while they said to him, "We will surely not kill you." Samson could have acted very differently. These worthless fetters were to him like so many spiders' webs, as he proved later. The strong man laughed at their new cords, but he consented to be bound.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Deliverer Given Up By His Own

One writer sees this handing-over repeated on a far greater day.

Samson, through God's unsearchable ways, was separated from his own people. They gave him up, just as the people of Judah later gave up the Lord Jesus, the true Nazarite, who came to save them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the Ropes Could Not Hold

The binding looked final. Both sides had misjudged what they were holding.

The men of Judah knew as little about the source of Samson's power as the Philistines did. What a sight! God's chosen vessel a prisoner — or so it seemed — in the hands of the men of Judah! And what could Samson do, with three thousand men of Judah against him as well as the Philistine army? By himself, nothing — but the conflict was not his, it was the Lord's; and the Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon him. It was no longer one man against thousands; it was the LORD against His enemies.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Bondage — Judah had stopped asking for rescue. Their own deliverer had become a burden, so they sided with their masters against him.

- Binding — new cords on God's man: a picture of the restraints His people lay on the Spirit's free working.

- Consent — Samson's strength was real, yet he would not turn it on his own people; he let himself be tied.

- Condition — he asked one thing: do not kill me. The link with his people held, so he could still face the enemy.

- Breaking — bound and outnumbered, he was not fighting his own battle. The ropes fell away when the Spirit of the Lord came on him.

Judges 15:14 · Darby

When he came to Lehi, the Philistines shouted against him. And the Spirit of Jehovah came upon him, and the cords that were on his arms became as threads of flax that are burned with fire, and his bands loosed from off his hands.

Samson is at his lowest point here: his own people have tied him with new ropes and handed him over, and the Philistines shout in triumph. Then everything turns, and commentators ask where that strength came from — and why so strong a man was so weak in character.

Whose fight it was

One writer reads the turn in this verse as a change of who is fighting, not a change in what Samson could do.

By himself he could do nothing. But the conflict was not his; it was the Lord's. And the Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon him. It was no longer a question of one man against thousands. It was the LORD against His enemies.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Cords like burnt flax

The ropes do not stretch or break; they stop being ropes. The weapon that follows is worth no more than they were.

But, at a given moment, the power of the Spirit bursts all bonds. "Then the Spirit of the LORD rushed upon him, and the ropes that were on his arms became as flax that has caught fire." Then God used a bone thrown away in the fields — the worthless jawbone of a donkey — to win a striking victory. We are such instruments in the hands of the Spirit of God (see 1 Corinthians 1:27-29). Yet it pleases the Lord to link our names with His victory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The cords his own people tied

The ropes were not Philistine ropes. Samson let his own tribe bind him. One writer sees there a picture of how God's people treat the Spirit's power when it unsettles them.

The people of God have acted towards the Holy Spirit in much the same way that Judah acted towards Samson. His power disturbed them. They did not want the liberty of the Spirit, so they have hindered His action. They have tied Him down, as it were, with their new methods, like the new cords with which Judah bound their liberator... The strong man laughed at their new cords, but he agreed to be bound.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

"Came upon" — the older way of working

The ESV says the Spirit "rushed upon him"; older translations read "came mightily upon him." One writer weighs what that coming meant in Old Testament times.

We read about Samson, "The Spirit of the Lord began to move him at times" (Judges 13:25). We also read that "the Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon him" (Judges 14:6, Judges 15:14)... Old Testament Scripture never suggests the thought of the Holy Spirit remaining. It was merely His coming upon a man in the character of power.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

One writer contrasts that coming from outside with what believers have now.

We may win victories like Samson's too. Not by depending on a temporary action of the Holy Spirit coming upon us from outside, but because through redemption God has sealed us with the Holy Spirit, who is the Spirit of power.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Great power, small man

Commentators are blunt: Samson's strength was a gift, never a certificate of character.

It is important to notice that we cannot judge the moral worth of a man of God by the greatness of his gift. Nowhere in Scripture do we find a stronger man than Samson, nor one weaker morally... Samson was a Nazirite — a man set apart to God by vow. The Spirit of God often came upon him. But he had never judged his own heart, so his state did not match the gift he used.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The gift was not guaranteed forever. Another writer traces where the notices of the Spirit stop.

It is worth noting that the Spirit of God worked mightily in Samson, a judge of Israel (Judges 13:25; Judges 14:6, 19; Judges 15:14). Samson betrayed his Nazirite vow to the crafty Delilah and lost his strength. After that, there are no more references to the Spirit working in him (Judges 16:17). When devotion to God was treated lightly, the Spirit's help was withdrawn.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The cords you are wearing

One writer turns the picture on the reader. The ropes on Samson's arms become the secret sin no one else can see.

Is there some silent chain wound around your heart, without a sound but without fail — and it may be, without your knowing it?... Perhaps it is some secret sin, something you cherish and allow in your heart and ways. No one else sees it. There it rusts and clings to you. Be warned, and look to Him who has pointed it out. His unerring eye has seen it. Just as surely, He can snap the chains that bind your heart. They will be like "the ropes that were on [Samson's] arms" — they will become "as flax that has caught fire."

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

Summary

- Bound first. His own people tie him, and the enemy cheers. The low point is where the power starts, not an obstacle to it.

- The fight changes owner. Once the Spirit comes on him, it is no longer one man against thousands. It is the Lord against His enemies.

- Cords, then a jawbone. The ropes turn to burnt flax, and a discarded bone wins the day. God works through what is worthless, and still links our names to His victory.

- Gift is not goodness. No man in Scripture was stronger than Samson, and none weaker in character. Power never proves the state of a heart.

- Your cords too. The fire that freed Samson's arms meets the silent chain around a heart. The One whose eye sees that chain can snap it.

Judges 15:15 · Darby

And he found a fresh jawbone of an ass, and put forth his hand and took it, and slew with it a thousand men.

Samson's own countrymen have just tied him with new ropes and handed him over to the Philistines, and the ropes have dropped off his arms like burnt flax. What follows is one man, one thrown-away bone, and a thousand dead enemies — so whose strength was that?

Borrowed strength

Enemies stand on both sides of Samson — three thousand men of Judah behind him, the Philistine army in front. One writer sees the moment as a change in whose fight it is.

The men of Judah knew as little about the source of Samson's power as the Philistines did... And what could Samson do, with three thousand men of Judah against him as well as the army of the Philistines? By himself, nothing. But the conflict was not his; it was the Lord's, and the Spirit of the Lord came powerfully upon him. So it was no longer a question of one man against thousands; it was the LORD against His enemies.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Philistines drew the wrong conclusion from what they saw.

The enemy no doubt thought Samson was just a man of tremendous strength. But the Spirit of God was the one who gave him that strength.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A bone from the field

Samson did not pick this weapon for its quality. It lay there worthless, and it gave the battlefield its name.

Then God used a bone thrown away in the fields, the worthless jawbone of a donkey, to win a great victory. The place took the name Ramath-lehi, from the name of that despised tool used in the fight. We are such tools in the hands of the Spirit of God (see 1 Cor. 1:27-29), yet it pleases the Lord to link our names with His victory, as if the jawbone of a donkey had killed "heaps upon heaps."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

That pattern runs through Samson's whole story, not just this scene.

True to God's way, the tools he used for his mighty feats were of the simplest kind. Once we read that "he had nothing in his hand" (Judges 14:6). Another time the only tool was "a fresh jawbone of a donkey," and with it he killed a thousand men (Judges 15:15).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

No swap for a sword

Swords lay all around him, and Samson kept the bone.

After killing a few of them, he did not even swap the jawbone for one of their swords. In his hand the jawbone worked perfectly well. If more than a thousand were there, the rest must have run away as fast as they could.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A strange weapon for a strange hour

The strangeness of the weapon matches the state of the nation.

To anyone who sees what a witness it is that the people had gone far from Him, the same principle stands out here in full strength. The man is left on his own. Then there are the events that had brought about the break with the enemy. There is the mind of Judah, not exactly treacherous to the Israelite, yet cowering before the Philistines. And now Samson uses the strangest of war weapons against them — the jawbone of a donkey.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A shadow on the victory

Commentators differ on whether Samson's choice was faultless. One writer sees a cost hidden inside the triumph.

An ass is typical of a strong self-will. The natural man is like a wild ass's colt. He takes up that unclean weapon, and he does win a victory with it. But you never use the flesh, an unclean thing, and never use self-will, without suffering for it. No matter how right the cause, if you use a wrong weapon it will hit back sooner or later... He did not realize that the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but mighty through God... He may boast if he likes, but he has used an unclean weapon, and there is a shadow even upon this which is the brightest side of his life.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What is in your hand

The practical use of the story is not admiration but action.

Great works have often been done by the faith and energy of people who had only small means — means that looked useless, or even worth despising. If we take this lesson to heart, we will not sit down waiting for swords or royal sceptres before we start work. We will hear the voice of God saying to us, What is that in your hand? A stick? Moses broke the power of Egypt with one like it. What has David not done with a stone? Or Gideon with torches and jars? Or Samson with the jawbone of a donkey?

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Source — By himself Samson was nothing. The Spirit of the Lord came on him, and the fight was no longer one man against thousands; it was the Lord against His enemies.

- Instrument — God reached for a bone thrown away in a field. Such worthless things are what He uses, and He still links our names with His victory.

- Sufficiency — Samson never swapped the jawbone for a Philistine sword. In a hand God is strengthening, the poor tool is enough.

- Shadow — Ridout warns that a wrong weapon in a right cause still costs something. A good aim does not make a wrong means clean.

- Summons — Don't wait for swords before you begin. The question God puts is not what do you lack but what is that in your hand.

Judges 15:16 · Darby

And Samson said, With the jawbone of an ass, a heap, two heaps, With the jawbone of an ass have I slain a thousand men.

The Weapon God Chose

Samson's song names his weapon twice, and that repetition is the point. How did a thousand armed men fall to a bone picked up in a field?

But at a given moment the power of the Spirit bursts all bonds… Then God used a bone thrown away in the fields, the worthless jawbone of a donkey, to win a remarkable victory. The place took its name, Ramath-lehi, from the contemptible tool used in the fight. Such instruments are we in the hands of the Spirit of God (see 1 Cor. 1:27-29), but it pleases the Lord to associate our names with His victory, as if the jawbone of a donkey had slain "heaps upon heaps."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The pattern runs through the whole book. Writers note that God repeatedly picked tools nobody would have picked.

Their persons show how God has chosen the weak things to accomplish His purposes. One was left-handed. Another used an ox-goad; still another pitchers and trumpets, and one had for a weapon the jawbone of a donkey. One was a woman.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Strength Was Not His Own

The answer lies in the verse just before the song, where the Spirit of the Lord came on Samson.

By himself he could do nothing. But the fight was not his, it was the Lord's, and the Spirit of the Lord came on him in power. So it was no longer one man against thousands. It was the LORD against His enemies.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

One writer points out that Samson never traded up. Swords were lying everywhere on that field.

After killing a few of them, he did not even swap the jawbone for one of their swords. In his hand the jawbone worked perfectly… The enemy no doubt thought Samson was just a man of huge strength. But the Spirit of God gave him that strength.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Wordplay in the Song

One writer renders the song to bring out its play on the word donkey:

Once He used the mouth of a living donkey to rebuke the madness of a prophet. Now He uses the jaw of a dead one as a weapon to defeat an army. The song of deliverance stresses this: "With the jaw of a donkey I have made donkeys of them; with the jaw of a donkey I have struck down a thousand men."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The animal itself carries the insult, and it names their fault.

In Scripture the donkey does not stand for stupidity, as it does for us. It usually stands for refusing the yoke, and that seems to be the meaning here. The easy victory showed that these men were rebels against the yoke of God's rule — a rule it was pointless to resist anyway.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

A Shadow Over the Triumph

Not everything here is bright. Samson was under a Nazirite vow, which forbade him to touch anything dead — and a bone was exactly that.

A donkey pictures a strong self-will… He takes up that unclean weapon, and he certainly does win a victory with it. But you never use the flesh, an unclean thing. You never use self-will without suffering for it. No matter how right the cause, if you use a wrong weapon it will turn back on you sooner or later… He may boast if he likes, but he has used an unclean weapon. A shadow lies even over this, the brightest part of his life.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer names the exact rule he broke, and applies it to us:

In using the jawbone of a donkey, Samson again broke the rules of his Nazirite vow by touching the bone of a dead animal (Num. 6:6). He pictures a believer using a wrong weapon to fight God's battles… So we too may fight for the truth with the means of the flesh. God may still give grace for a victory, but no credit goes to the vessel… It is not enough to be on the right side. We must also act rightly if we want a reward for our work.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Followed the Song

In the next verses Samson drops the bone and nearly dies of thirst.

With a jawbone he laid heaps upon heaps, and after the work he sang with a soul full of joy. Then he threw the jawbone away, and his own needs hit him hard… Great service for others will not meet the needs of the soul. Only the Lord can meet them. However brilliant our service, our own souls will starve unless the Lord Himself sustains them. Service alone never sustains.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer sees that as the right end for the bone, and turns it on our habit of praising gifted people:

It has served his purpose, so let it go. After all, it is nothing more than the poor jawbone of a dead donkey!… Everywhere we hear what a wonderful man this man is! What marvellous power in the gospel! What beauty in his teaching!… Samson might just as well have said, "What a powerful jawbone! What a wonderful jawbone!"

Modernised from F. C. JenningsOriginal wording

Summary

- Bone. God won the day with something dead, thrown away in a field. The tool was worthless, so the victory could belong to no one but Him.

- Breath. The bone did nothing until the Spirit of the Lord came on Samson. It was not one man against thousands, but the Lord against His enemies.

- Boast. The song puns on the donkey: an animal that will not take the yoke, matching a people who would not bow to God's rule.

- Blemish. Touching a dead bone broke his Nazirite vow. You can be on the right side and still fight with the wrong weapon, and it will cost you later.

- Bareness. Straight after the song came raging thirst. Service for others never feeds the servant; only God does that.

Judges 15:17 · Darby

And it came to pass when he had ended speaking, that he cast away the jawbone out of his hand, and called that place Ramath-Lehi.

Samson's song of triumph ends, and the first thing he does is open his hand and let the weapon fall. The place then takes its name from that weapon. Why does the winner drop what won the battle, and what is the name meant to preserve?

Letting the instrument go

The gesture is deliberate. One commentator reads the dropped jawbone as a refusal to let the tool take the credit:

He will not keep it. It might become a snare to him: Israel might go chasing after it as they did after Gideon's ephod. It has served his purpose, now let it go — after all it is nothing more than the poor jawbone of a dead donkey! Oh, that we could learn something from this! It is such a day for exalting the poor, foolish instruments that God, in His goodness, may use. Do we not hear everywhere what a wonderful man this man is! What marvellous power in the gospel! What beauty of exposition! What magnetism! What a clever man he is! Yes, indeed, Samson might just as well say, "What a powerful jawbone! What a wonderful jawbone! What a magnetic jawbone!" No, no — put the poor jawbone where it belongs. It must not take away from the glory of Him to whom all glory alone is due.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

The name on the map

The name itself comes from the weapon:

Place in Judah, near to the land of the Philistines. It was where Samson killed a thousand men with the jawbone of a donkey. Judges 15:9-17. Lehi means "jawbone," but whether the place had this name before the victory or after is not clear. Samson called the place RAMATH-LEHI, "hill of the jawbone."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The name does more than mark a battlefield:

He casts the instrument of destruction out of his hand, and calls the place the "Jawbone Height." The lesson is worthy of preserving in the name.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why God chose such a weapon

The weapon itself carries a message. God works through what counts for nothing:

Then God made use of a bone cast away in the fields, the worthless jawbone of a donkey, to gain a remarkable victory. We are such instruments in the hands of the Spirit of God (see 1 Corinthians 1:27-29). Yet it pleases the Lord to link our names with His victory, as if the jawbone of a donkey had killed "heaps upon heaps."

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A shadow over the brightest day

Not every writer reads the weapon so kindly. Samson lived under the Nazirite vow, a vow of separation to God:

For an Israelite, the most defiling thing of all was to touch a bone. Yet Samson takes up an unclean weapon against the Philistines: the jawbone of a donkey, evidence of death, and from an unclean animal. A donkey is a picture of strong self-will. The natural man is like a wild donkey's colt. He takes up that unclean weapon, and he does gain a victory with it. But you never use the flesh, an unclean thing, and you never use self-will, without suffering for it. No matter how right the cause, if you use a wrong weapon, sooner or later it will rebound. So I think we have here a sign that the man did not value his Nazirite standing. He did not realise that the weapons of our warfare are not worldly, but mighty through God. Oh, to use spiritual weapons in spiritual conflict! Do not take up the enemy's weapon. Do not come down to the enemy's level, however remarkable it was for him to pile up heaps and heaps of Philistines with that one jawbone. He may boast if he likes. But he has used an unclean weapon, and a shadow falls even over this, the brightest part of his life.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

So commentators differ. Some see wisdom in the weapon God chose. Ridout sees carelessness about the vow.

What the empty hand exposes

The jawbone drops, and Samson has nothing left but himself. What happens next is the point:

He had laid heaps upon heaps with a jawbone, and had sung with great joy of soul after his work. Then he threw away the jawbone, and his own personal needs came upon him. "He was very thirsty." Great services for others will not supply the soul's necessities. Only the Lord can supply them. However brilliant our services, our own souls will starve unless the Lord Himself sustains them. Service alone never sustains. On the contrary, the fresher the service, the more we shall be conscious of our own need and dependence on God for personal support.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Instrument dropped. The victory ends with an open hand. The jawbone has done its work. Keeping it would only turn a tool into something people chase after.

- Instrument named. Ramath-lehi means "hill of the jawbone." The place remembers the weapon, not the strong man.

- Instrument worthless. God won a great victory with a bone thrown away in a field. He still linked His servant's name to it. We are useful on the same terms.

- Instrument unclean. Others read the bone as death and self-will in Samson's hand. A wrong weapon rebounds sooner or later. It casts a shadow over even his best day.

- Instrument empty. With the jawbone gone, the thirst appears. Work done for others feeds nobody's soul. Only the Lord Himself supplies the servant.

Judges 15:18 · Darby

And he was very thirsty, and called on Jehovah, and said, Thou hast given by the hand of thy servant this great deliverance, and now shall I die for thirst, and fall into the hand of the uncircumcised?

Samson has just killed a thousand men with the jawbone of a donkey. Moments later the victor is dying — not of wounds, but of thirst, and his cry asks why God would let that happen at the height of his success.

Service that does not feed the servant

The order of events matters. Samson sings his victory song, throws the jawbone away, and only then feels his own need. One writer draws out the principle:

He used a jawbone to lay heaps upon heaps, and he sang with a thrilled soul after his work. Then he threw the jawbone away, and his own personal wants hit him. "He was very thirsty." Great services for others will not supply what the soul needs. Only the Lord can supply that. However brilliant our services, our own souls will starve unless the Lord sustains them directly. Service by itself never sustains. On the contrary, the fresher the service, the more we will feel our own need and our dependence on God for personal support. No great deliverance granted will supply one drop of relief to the weary soul.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why the moment of victory is the moment of danger

Samson's fear is not death alone. It is dying this way — falling into the power of the enemy he has just beaten. One writer calls that fear healthy, not faithless:

People have often noted that the moment of victory is the moment of greatest weakness, and Samson felt this. This was his fear: to fall into the hands of the uncircumcised, to be in their power. Scripture speaks of the Philistines this way again and again. Circumcision speaks of cutting off and setting aside the flesh, and it had no place with them. So it was right that the Nazarite should fear coming under their power. I wish there were more of this fear today; it would make us more like Samson in his dependence upon God.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

(A Nazarite was a man under a vow that set him apart for God.)

The argument he puts to God

Notice what Samson reasons with. He does not plead his own record; he holds up what God has already done as the ground for what God must do next.

But God, who cares for His poor servant, must make him feel his own need of the same lesson. The heat and exhaustion of the fight leave him with a thirst that could kill him. The man who had been dealing out death to others now faces a danger his own hand cannot save him from. He can only cry to Jehovah, and plead with Him His recent intervention on his behalf as the argument for a new one. It is a good argument with the Unchangeable One. He is not a man, that He should change His mind. He is the One "with whom there is no variation or shadow due to change." The lesson, too, must be complete to be a lesson. And He who has just delivered Samson from the hands of the uncircumcised cannot allow him now to fall into them.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Where the water came from

The next verse is often pictured as water from the jawbone. One dictionary corrects that:

Judges 15:19 is better translated, "God clave the hollow place that is in Lehi," that is, in the rock, not in the jaw-bone.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer takes that cleft rock as a picture, and draws the practical lesson:

If we do not want to lose the results of conflict, we must use the word of God for our refreshment, and not only for battle. In his extremity, Samson called on Jehovah. God showed him a refreshing spring flowing out of a rock that His own hand had split open. The rock everywhere and always is Christ. "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink" (John 7:37). Let us get back into Christ's presence after conflict.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A rare prayer from a strong man

God answered the cry, and the name Samson gave the place records what he learned:

From God alone must that come. And so, in answer to Samson's cry, God relieves him, and he calls the place En-hakkore, "the well of him that called." He commemorates not his service, but his dependence on God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

It is worth weighing how seldom Samson called on God at all:

Samson was not a man of prayer. Only twice in all his history do we hear him speaking to God (Judges 15:18; Judges 11:28).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

(Rossier's text prints Judges 11:28; Samson's other recorded prayer is in Judges 16:28.)

Summary

- Victory. Samson felled a thousand enemies, then lay helpless himself — the win did not water the winner.

- Thirst. Work done for others never feeds the worker; the fresher the service, the sharper the sense of personal need.

- Fear. Samson dreaded falling into the hands of the uncircumcised. That dread is the very thing that kept him dependent.

- Cry. He argued from God's past deliverance to God's present help — a sound argument with the God who does not change.

- Well. God split the rock, and Samson named the place after the caller, not the conqueror — a memorial of dependence, not achievement.

Judges 15:19 · Darby

And God clave the hallow rock which was in Lehi, and water came out of it. And he drank, and his spirit came again, and he revived. Therefore its name was called En-hakkore, which is in Lehi to this day.

Samson has just cut down heaps of the enemy with a donkey's jawbone. Now the man no one could beat in battle is dying of thirst. His cry, and God's answer in the cleft rock, turn a monument of his own strength into a monument of his dependence.

The hollow place, not the jawbone

Some have read the verse as if water burst out of the bone Samson had thrown away. The name he gave the place points instead to what he did there.

Samson gave this name, meaning "the caller's spring," to the place where God gave him water in answer to his call. There is no doubt that the spring was in the rock, not in the jawbone. The words that follow show it: "it is at Lehi to this day."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Lehi means "jawbone": the place took its name from the weapon.

Service does not feed the servant

Notice the order. He sings over the heaps of slain, throws the jawbone away, and only then feels his own need.

He used a jawbone to lay heaps upon heaps, and he sang with delight of soul after his work. Then he threw the jawbone away, and his own personal needs troubled him. "He was very thirsty." Great services for others will not supply the soul's needs. Only the Lord can supply them. However brilliant our services, our own souls will starve unless the Lord Himself sustains them. Mere service never sustains. On the contrary, the fresher the service, the more we will feel our own need, and our dependence on God for personal support.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The danger that follows a win

Winning the fight was not the end of the danger. What Samson needed next could not be won by fighting.

The believer's activity is not everything; conflict does not quench thirst... If we do not want to lose what the conflict has won, we must use the word of God to refresh us, and not only for battle. In his extremity, Samson called on the LORD, who showed him a refreshing spring flowing out of a rock that God's hand had split open. The rock everywhere and always is Christ. "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink" (John 7:37). Let us get back into Christ's presence after conflict. His word will refresh us. Samson was alive to the dangers that closely follow victory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The first time his soul turns to God

The thirst did what the fighting never did. It sent him to God.

Then after the victory is won, another bright gleam comes out. Poor dear man, it is the first time we hear his soul going out to God. "My soul thirsts for God, for the living God." We find him parched with thirst. Even after this great victory, the most severe thirst afflicts his soul. Well it might, since he had used an unclean weapon, and well might he find a parched dryness in his soul. But he turns to God, he calls for help, and in the place that bore the name of his victory — Lehi, "the jawbone" — God splits open a place in the rock for him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God heard him, faults and all

The chapter gives no polish to Samson's character. That is what makes God's answer so striking.

Divine power never failed Samson against the enemy. More than that, the LORD's tenderness toward His poor servant stands out. Did He turn away when the thirsty man called on Him, as he cried to God in his distress? Bad as the features we have seen were, we have worse still to see. Yet when he called, God heard and answered him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From the spring to twenty years of judging

The rock frames the whole episode. Samson lived in a rock before the battle, and water came out of rock after it.

This section begins and ends with the rock. He lived in the rock, and out of the rock, under God's splitting hand, the water flows out for his refreshment. The well is called En-hakkore, "the spring of him that called" to God. It is in connection with that, growing out of all that, that we read he judged Israel twenty years... In this period of complete separation from the Philistines, he lived in the rock. He broke the bonds that even his own people would put on him. He stood out in all the energy of faith in God. Then, and only then, could he judge the people of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Called. En-hakkore means "the spring of him that called." Samson named the place after his cry, not after his victory.

- Cleft. God split open the rock at Lehi, not the jawbone Samson had thrown away. The spring was still there long after.

- Drank. Service for others never feeds the servant's own soul. Only the Lord does that. The fresher the service, the deeper the need.

- Revived. The moment after victory is the moment of greatest danger — the refreshment comes from the rock, and the rock is Christ: "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink."

- Ruled. The man who called, and lived in the rock, judged Israel for twenty years. Power to lead God's people grew out of dependence on God.

Judges 15:20 · Darby

And he judged Israel in the days of the Philistines twenty years.

Judges 15 ends not with a battle but with a quiet line of record-keeping: twenty years of judging. Why is it placed here, before the darkest chapter of Samson's life — and what does judging mean while the Philistines still rule?

A seal on the first half

Samson's early career holds much that is shameful and much that is great. This single line takes back none of it. One writer reads the line as God's own verdict on the public work of a flawed servant:

The first part of Samson's history closes with these words: "And he judged Israel in the days of the Philistines twenty years" (v. 20). Despite all the failures we have pointed out, it contains God's approval of the public career of His servant. The next chapter shows us the loss of his Nazariteship.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Nazariteship meant devotion to the Lord. The note also works as an ending, even though Samson's story is not over. One writer says the Spirit of God placed it here on purpose:

It appears to me that the Spirit of God brings in this little notice of his judging Israel here to show that this is the normal close of his history. Nor should we wonder at it. Not that God did not work mightily afterwards, and even more in his death than in his life.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The rock and the spring behind the twenty years

The twenty years are not listed on their own. They grow out of what came just before: Samson living in the rock, and God opening the rock to give him water. One writer ties the two together:

This section begins and ends with the rock. He lived in the rock, and out of the rock, under God's cleaving hand, the water flows out for his refreshment. The well is called En-hakkore, the spring of the one who called on God. Out of all that, and in connection with it, we read that he judged Israel twenty years... He lived apart from the Philistines, in open conflict with them. In that same way he had power to judge the people of God. He could be no real judge for them when he was down allying himself with his enemies.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Judging while the enemy still rules

The phrase "in the days of the Philistines" matters. Samson judged, but the Philistines still held Israel down:

Verse 20 tells us that he judged Israel twenty years. What form his authority took may be a little difficult to understand. But he was able to withstand the Philistines that long. He never threw off their yoke of oppression over Israel.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That limit had a reason. The man who would break Philistine power had not yet come:

God would use another man at a later date to destroy the power of the Philistines. He was a man of a different spirit, with a hand very different from Samson's. I mean, of course, David, the son of Jesse. Whatever might be done now was only the beginning of deliverance for Israel. God would magnify His power, but only as a witness now and then; nothing more.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A lonely office

Samson served these twenty years alone. The Spirit gave him power, but Israel gave him no help:

In all this portion we note too, that "The Spirit of the Lord" came upon him in his mighty acts (Judges 13:25; Judges 14:6, 19; Judges 15:14). And we also notice that he is not accompanied by Israel in these acts. No, even the men of Judah come down to bind him and to deliver him into the Philistines' hand!

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

What kept him standing

One writer names three things needed to stand for Christ — the same three that run through Samson's story here:

Do we want to contend boldly for the truth, to stand for Christ, keeping His Word and not denying His Name? Then three things are absolutely needed: (1) Nazariteship — devotion to the Lord. (2) The Rock — the knowledge of the perfect stability of all God's purposes in Christ risen from the dead. (3) The well of water — dependence on the Spirit of God for refreshment of soul and power for service.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Rock. Samson judged from the rock, living apart from the Philistines and in open conflict with them. He lost that power when he allied with them.

- Spring. His rule grew out of En-hakkore, the spring of the one who called on God. God refreshed him there, and the twenty years followed.

- Seal. For all his failures, this verse is God's approval of his public work. It closes that work; his Nazariteship is lost in the next chapter.

- Limit. He withstood the Philistines but never threw off their yoke. This was only the beginning of deliverance; David would break their power.

- Alone. The Spirit came on him in his mighty acts, yet Israel never joined him. The men of Judah came to hand him over bound.

Judges 16:1 · Darby

And Samson went to Gazah, and saw there a harlot, and went in to her.

Judges 16 opens with the strongest man in Israel walking into a Philistine city and into a prostitute's house. He ends the night by tearing the city gates out of the ground and carrying them off. Two questions follow. How did a man set apart to God get here? And why did his strength stay when his conscience went?

The next step down

This verse is not a sudden collapse. It is the next step on a road Samson was already walking.

We now enter a new period in Samson's history. It is marked by the loss of his Nazariteship and by his restoration… In Judges 15, God preserved His servant despite himself, in a definite involvement with a woman who served other gods. But that did not correct the natural tendency of his heart. And the first verse of this chapter shows us where that tendency led him. He had courted the idolatrous world, and now he goes after the defiled world, not fearing a temporary association with it. A worldly leaning left unjudged is bound to lead us into more serious falls.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Nazarite was someone under a vow of separation to God, marked out by uncut hair.

Failure never confessed

One writer traces this fall to an earlier failure Samson never faced.

Once we have lost our Nazariteship, we never recover our former condition. Not unless we fully face the fact, judge ourselves thoroughly, and come back into communion… Samson needed to confess his failure and sin. But there is no trace of it, and that accounts for the sad record at the beginning of chapter 16. He had clearly lost all sense of what suited his divine call and mission. So Satan grew bolder with his temptations, and now appeals not to the natural affections, as before, but to fleshly lusts. Samson's eyes were his constant snare.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A victim inside first

Before his enemies ever close in, something inside him has already taken him.

Samson goes down to Gaza to gratify his own appetites, caring little what stain this might leave on the name of God and on the name of His people. He goes down there a victim to the flesh. And, dear friends, if someone is a victim to the flesh inside, in time he will be a victim on the outside too, where all can see it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Strength that outlives conscience

The gates come off the hinges anyway. One writer reads that surviving power not as God's approval but as His patience.

It may seem strange that a man could have any power at all who had so completely sacrificed his conscience, as Samson had. But it is a sad fact: the strength remains for a while after conscience has gone. It seems to be the lingering mercy of God, holding a person back where even conscience is asleep, where something has stopped it from acting.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An escape, not a victory

The escape looks like a display of power. One writer weighs what it actually achieved.

Samson was allowed to deliver himself by his great strength — but that was all. He won no victory over the Philistines and brought no glory to God. He simply escaped from the hands of his foes. And let the reader notice that the name of God does not appear in the incident. What a contrast to the close of the previous chapter. There Samson called on the Lord. He owned God's hand in the rescue he had just received and asked Him for more help, and God heard His servant's cry. Here he seems to act in self-confidence, using for his own ends what God had given him — a further proof of his sad state of soul.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The victory this scene only shadows

The gates on Samson's shoulders point past him to a greater deliverance.

More than once Samson's history reminds us of Christ's — for instance, his victory over the lion of Timnah, and again in the feat of the gates of Gaza. Like Samson, the Lord woke from the sleep of death. He broke the gates of the enemy's terrible fortress and brought his schemes to nothing… Death was Satan's stronghold. It no longer has doors to hold us. It has become a passage for us. No bolt could imprison Christ there, and no power can keep us there.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Tendency. A worldly leaning left unjudged carries a person on: first he courts the idolatrous world, then he enters the defiled one.

- Silence. Samson never confessed his earlier failure. So the enemy grew bolder, aiming now at lust instead of affection.

- Inside. He was a victim to the flesh within long before his enemies closed in outside. The inward surrender comes first.

- Strength. Strength that outlives conscience is not God's approval. It is His lingering mercy — a warning Samson ignored.

- Escape. He got out, but he won nothing, and God's name never appears. The gates point past him to Christ, who broke death's doors, so death is now only a passage for us.

Judges 16:2 · Darby

[And it was told] the Gazathites, saying, Samson is come hither. And they surrounded [him], and laid wait for him all night at the gate of the city, and were quiet all the night, saying, In the morning light we will kill him.

Samson is asleep in an enemy city, and word of his arrival travels fast. The men of Gaza surround the house. They set an ambush at the city gate and settle down to wait for daylight. Two questions follow. How did a man set apart to God by vow — a Nazirite — end up here? And why does his strength still hold when his conscience does not?

How He Came to Be There

Nothing in this ambush is sudden. Commentators trace it back to a leaning of heart that Samson never judged.

He had courted the idolatrous world, and now he goes after the defiled world, not fearing temporary association with it. A worldly tendency left unjudged necessarily leads us into more serious falls.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer measures the fall by what Samson no longer bothers to keep up.

He does not even keep up the outward forms, but now indulges his own desires, despite the stain it leaves on his own moral character... He goes down there a victim to the flesh. And if a man is a victim to the flesh inside, it is only a matter of time before he is a victim on the outside, where everyone can see.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Trap at the Gate

Gaza was a Philistine city, and its gate was the one way out. So they lock it and wait in silence. The plan assumes the gate will hold him.

When the Gazites knew he was in the prostitute's house, they surrounded the place. They waited to kill him in the morning. They had locked the gate of the city. But Samson got up at midnight. With no one to stop him, he took hold of both gateposts and the doors of the gate and carried them to the top of a hill. He could easily have thrown them aside. Clearly he wanted to show his contempt for the Philistines by making them do heavy work to get their gates back.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators also read the city's name as part of the picture. Why does the trap fail at all?

It is true that he survived at Gaza, though the Gazites were determined to kill him. He had not then given up his Nazirite vow. And he still proved stronger than the Philistines' strength — which is what the name Gaza means.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Strength That Outlives Conscience

The puzzle is not that the ambush failed. It is that a man in this condition still had power at all.

Samson had sacrificed his conscience completely. It may seem strange that such a man could have any power at all. But it is a sad fact that the strength remains for a little while after conscience has gone. It seems to be the lingering mercy of God that would hold one back even where conscience is asleep... By keeping some of that strength, God in His mercy would still have a word for the soul.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer sees the whole display as aimed at the enemy, not at God.

Yet here, though he had fallen lower than ever, we find power put forth in these shameful circumstances... The man went out in the confidence of his strength. To all appearance he did things just to make the enemy feel what he could do. There was about as little thought of God in it as you could find in a man who feared Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

An Escape, Not a Recovery

Carrying off the gates looks like total victory. One writer calls it something else.

After all, it was a retreat this man of might was beating. He was running away from the Philistines. Even supposing he did carry their gates on his shoulders, he was running away from them. He was not facing them. He had no power to face them. How could he have power when his own conscience was not right with God?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That is why the escape settles nothing. Hebron is a town in the hill country far inland, and its name is the point here.

Hebron means communion. Shaking off a power for the time being is not enough. It takes more than that for the soul to get back to God, to communion.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Drift. A worldly leaning that is never judged does not stay still. It carries a believer from compromise into a worse fall.

- Ambush. The enemy locks the gate and waits in silence. That same gate became the thing Samson carried away.

- Mercy. Strength that outlives conscience is a warning from God's patience. It is not His approval.

- Retreat. Carrying the gates away was an escape in the dark, not a victory face to face. No power is real while the conscience is wrong with God.

- Unheeded. Samson kept the strength and missed the warning. Escaping a trap is not the same as getting back to God.

Judges 16:3 · Darby

And Samson lay till midnight; and he arose at midnight, and seized the doors of the gate of the city, and the two posts, and tore them up with the bar, and put [them] upon his shoulders, and carried them up to the top of the mountain that is before Hebron.

Samson is shut inside Gaza, the enemy's own city, by men who mean to kill him — but at midnight he tears out the city gate and walks away with it. Commentators read the scene two ways: as power left in a man whose conscience was asleep, and as a picture of a greater rescue to come.

Gaza: the enemy's strength defeated

The city's own name carries the point of the night.

It is true that he survived at Gaza, though the Gazites were determined to kill him. He had not then given up his Nazarite vow, and he still proved stronger than the Philistines' strength, which is the meaning of Gaza.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Power that outlives conscience

Samson's conscience was asleep, yet his strength still worked. One writer explains how that can be.

It may seem strange that a man could have any power at all after sacrificing his conscience so completely, as Samson had. But it is a sad fact: the strength remains for a little while after conscience has gone. This seems to be the lingering mercy of God, which would hold a man back even where conscience is asleep and kept from acting.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An escape, not a victory

The night ends with Samson free and the Philistines unharmed. One writer points to what the account leaves out.

God allowed Samson to deliver himself by his great strength — but that was all. He won no victory over the Philistines, and brought no glory to God. He simply escaped from the hands of his foes. And let the reader notice that the name of God does not appear in the incident. What a contrast to the close of the previous chapter. There Samson called on the Lord. He acknowledged God's hand in the rescue he had just received and asked Him for still more help. And God heard His servant's cry.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Another writer counts what the night actually achieved.

True, God had not left him to the consequences of his pride and lust. The strength of the Nazarite had not deserted him. But he had only made a grand mockery of the enemy; he had done him no harm. The strength that should have delivered Israel he used here only to deliver himself. He was the one who had to flee, not the Philistines. He had shown his strength, but gained no dignity.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The hill toward Hebron — and no further

The place he carried them to matters as much as the feat itself.

The account says he carried the gates up to the top of a hill that is before Hebron — or, as the meaning is, the hill that looks toward Hebron. It looks as if he were going toward Hebron, but Hebron is many miles away from that place. Gaza is down by the seashore, and Hebron is far off in the hill country of Judea... Hebron means communion, and it takes more than shaking off a power for the time being to bring the soul back to God, back to communion.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Stopping on that hilltop pictures a recovery that goes part of the way and stops.

We give up something in part, but it is only cut off above the root. We cut off the outward fruit, yet we never cut clean away from the root of the thing itself, and above all, we never truly get back to God... There is great danger in a partial restoration to communion, in travelling the road part of the way to Hebron and stopping short of it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A greater One who carried gates away

One writer sees in this night a picture of Christ's resurrection.

More than once the history of Samson reminds us of Christ — his victory over the lion of Timnath, for instance, and again the taking of the gates of Gaza. Like Samson, the Lord awoke from the sleep of death and brought the schemes of the enemy to nothing by breaking the gates of his terrible fortress... Death, the stronghold of Satan, no longer has doors to hold us. It has become a passage for us. No bolt could imprison Christ there, and no power can keep us there.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Gates lifted. Gaza means strength. The city named for strength lost its gates in one night, carried off on one man's shoulders.

- Gates without God. The power held, but God's name never appears. Samson escaped, and that was all: no victory, no glory to God.

- Gates instead of enemies. Samson used strength meant for Israel to save himself. He mocked the enemy without harming him.

- Gates set down short of Hebron. Hebron means communion, and he only faced that way. Partial recovery cuts off the fruit and leaves the root.

- Gates finally broken. What Samson only pictured, Christ did. He rose from the sleep of death and broke the gates of that fortress. Death now holds no bolt against those who are His.

Judges 16:4 · Darby

And it came to pass afterwards that he loved a woman in the valley of Sorek, whose name was Delilah.

After years of astonishing strength, the man set apart to God gives his heart to a Philistine woman. Commentators read this verse as the last step of a slow decline, and it raises one question — what happens when our love settles where God's heart is not set?

The Word "Loved"

Samson had failed before through his eyes and his appetites. This time one word in the verse marks something new.

One word, which the Spirit of God uses, gives the key to this last trap. It says, "After this he loved a woman in the Valley of Sorek, whose name was Delilah." This word "loved" shows that Satan had now found Samson's special weakness. He combined the two earlier temptations into one. He drew Samson to Delilah through his natural affections and through his bodily desires at the same time.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The same writer applies this to us. The moment our hearts are set on what the Lord's heart is not set on, we are out of communion. And out of communion, we soon become easy prey to every passing temptation.

Three Women, Three Stages

The fall did not begin in this verse. Samson was a Nazirite: a man under a vow that set him apart to God. One writer traces three women, and three steps down.

In Samson's life, three women mark the three stages that led to the loss of his Nazirite standing. The first pleased his eyes. He formed a passing connection with the second (Judges 16:1), and he loved the third (Judges 16:4). When he gave his affections, the last hour of his Nazirite life had sounded.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Valley of Sorek

The place itself carries the message. A Nazirite's vow forbade him the fruit of the vine.

Sorek means "the vine." It is a sad sight. The victorious Nazirite, who had lived on the rock and drunk from the well there, now goes down to drink from the brook that ran through the valley of the vines. As a Nazirite he had refused the fruit of the vine, and at the start of his career he had killed a lion in the vineyards. There he overcame the strong one. Now, in the valley of the vines, he falls victim to Delilah, whose name means weakness.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the name. Another reads Sorek as "a snare," and hears in the going down a moral descent, not just a change of place.

The Strong Man and the Weak Woman

Her name carries the point. Weakness brings down Israel's strongest man.

Here is the strong man caught in the trap, and the weak woman — whose very name seems to mean "weakness" or helplessness. That very woman, in her weakness and helplessness, is the one who draws him and holds him. Nothing can free him from her power, because his own heart has come under that power.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Samson had every warning. Delilah tried more than once to hand him over, and he stayed.

Here we meet more than the old sin repeated, and in its most corrupt form. With it comes an infatuation as extraordinary as his disgrace. Without that infatuation, the repeated attempts to seize him would have opened his eyes to her trickery and their murderous hatred. But the way of those who break God's law is hard, and the guilty man falls under this strange woman's spell again and again. Such is the blinding power of sin. Was he ignorant of her vileness, or of his own danger?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Was Actually at Stake

Strip away the drama and one thing was on trial. Samson's uncut hair was not a magic charm but a visible sign of a life given to God.

His unshaven hair carried his unbeatable strength, by God's will. Only one thing was really involved — obedience... It is the perfection of the creature, giving God His place and man his own. It is the lowliest place for anyone here on earth, and at the same time the morally highest, as it is for the angels above.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Kelly adds that Samson fell as Adam fell, and as everyone since has fallen. Only Christ stood, though He was tried as no one else ever was.

Summary

- Descent — The fall came slowly. One woman pleased his eyes. One he visited briefly. The third he loved, and each step went deeper than the last.

- Affection — The word "loved" is the hinge. Earlier traps caught his senses. This one caught his heart — and once the heart is caught, the last hour has sounded.

- Location — He went down to the valley of the vine, the very thing his vow forbade. Another reading of the name is "a snare." Moral descent has a geography.

- Blindness — He had plenty of proof of Delilah's design, and stayed anyway. Such is the blinding power of sin.

- Obedience — Behind the hair, the strength and the secret stood one issue: obedience. It gives God His place and man his own. Samson lost it; Christ never did.

Judges 16:5 · Darby

And the lords of the Philistines came up to her, and said to her, Persuade him, and see in what his great strength is, and with what we may prevail against him, that we may bind him to overpower him; and we will each give thee eleven hundred silver-pieces.

The five Philistine rulers do not attack Samson. They go to the woman he loves and put a price on the one thing they cannot break: the secret of his strength.

A Conversation He Never Heard

They lay this plot while Samson is away. One writer treats that hidden meeting as the hinge of the whole story.

The most important thing in the story may be a conversation Samson never heard and never knew about. The five lords of the Philistines came to Delilah and said, "Entice him, and see where his great strength lies" (Judges 16:5). This is very like the time when Satan asked the Lord's permission to deal with Job, to test him and afflict him. As far as we can see, from the start of that story to the end, Job never knew what lay behind his terrible suffering.

Modernised from J. S. BlackburnOriginal wording

From Threats to Silver

Earlier the Philistines had used terror on someone close to Samson. With Delilah they change the currency.

He goes down there and links himself with her, and the Philistines make full use of that. If he has put himself under the power of a principle that is not according to God, a visible power will soon take hold of him — something more than the power over his heart. They offer this woman pay. Philistines are not very careful about how they do things. The first time, they appealed to one of Samson's friends with a threat: they would burn her and her father's house with fire. Now they appeal to this one with silver — eleven hundred pieces of it — if she will only entice from him what he had never yet disclosed: the secret of his strength.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Word "Entice"

The rulers do not say "seize him" or "frighten him." Where the ESV has "seduce him," older translations read "entice him" — and that word had already appeared once in Samson's story.

Samson's weakness was now plain to see. Even the lords of the Philistines, Satan's instruments, had found the quickest way to trap their enemy. "Entice him," they say to Delilah, "and see where his great strength lies, and by what means we may overcome him." Notice the word "entice." It is the same word Samson's "companions" used at his wedding feast. It unfolds the secret of Satan's method. He will terrify where possible; but failing that, he always turns to enticements. Many a servant of the Lord has stood in the front line of the battle. By God's grace he never flinched under Satan's fiercest attacks. Yet afterwards he fell an easy victim to this more subtle temptation.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why They Wanted the Secret, Not the Man

The Philistines had felt Samson's power without ever understanding it.

Until now, Samson had guarded his close and secret relationship with God, despite everything. He had something the world could not understand. The world could not rise to its source. His strength remained a riddle to his enemies. No doubt they saw its effect, but that effect was aimed at them. So they were all the more eager to wrest the secret of it from him, and to learn what weapons to use against this servant of the Lord.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Last Position Still Holding

Samson had already failed openly and often. Yet the enemy still had ground to take.

It seems strange, almost unthinkable. Samson had failed so openly, and yet the stronghold of his heart was still on the right side. It was not in the hands of the enemy, although it had been unfaithful time and again. But the stronghold, the innermost soul of the man, was still for God, who in mercy had so far stepped in on his behalf. Now Delilah is to lay siege to that stronghold of his heart. She is to draw the key from him, so that the enemy may rush in and take full possession.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Is Lost When the Secret Is Told

One writer weighs what a person loses by handing God's secret to a stranger.

Samson had no excuse for yielding to Delilah's flattery. But she had trapped him in her snares; otherwise he would have drawn back in horror from what she asked. "The secret of God, the possession of His confidence, is the highest of all privileges. To betray it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position in which His grace has placed us: it is to lose it."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret targeted. His strength was a riddle his enemies could feel but not explain. So they set out to wrest its secret from him and learn what weapon would work.

- Secret besieged. His heart's stronghold was still on God's side; Delilah's task was to get the key to it so the enemy could rush in.

- Secret enticed. They do not say "seize him" but "entice him" — Satan terrifies where he can, and where he cannot, he allures.

- Secret priced. They threatened one woman with fire; this one they paid — eleven hundred pieces of silver.

- Secret betrayed. To hold God's confidence is the highest privilege; to hand it to a stranger is to despise that place — and to lose it.

Judges 16:6 · Darby

Then Delilah said to Samson, Tell me, I pray thee, in what is thy great strength, and with what thou mightest be bound to overpower thee.

Delilah asks Samson straight out what makes him strong, and how an enemy could tie him down and beat him. The Philistine rulers have bribed her to ask, and the strange thing is not the question but that Samson stays to hear it.

A strength his enemies could not explain

The rulers went to Delilah because nothing about Samson accounted for what he did. His power was not in his build. It came from his place before God as a Nazirite — a man set apart to God, marked by hair that was never cut.

We should not imagine Samson to be a giant with an impressive physique. Samson's strength was a mystery to the Philistines. They had to turn to Delilah: "Persuade him, and see in what his great strength is." But that great strength depended entirely on his consecration as a Nazirite. When his hair was cut off, he became as weak as a child.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Samson is in this conversation because he gave way to his own heart. Even so, his secret had held until now.

This is where the path ends for the child of God who gives way to the first stirrings of his natural heart, instead of judging them. Until now Samson had guarded his close, secret relationship with God, despite everything. He had something the world could not understand, and its source was beyond the world's reach. His strength remained a riddle to his enemies. No doubt they saw its effects — effects aimed at themselves. That made them all the more eager to wrench the secret out of him, so they could find out what weapons to use against this servant of the Lord.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Enticement, not force

The rulers send a woman, not an army. That choice shows how the enemy usually works.

He will terrify where possible. Failing that, he always turns to enticements. Many a servant of the Lord has stood in the front line of the battle. By God's grace he never flinched under Satan's fiercest attacks. Yet afterwards he fell an easy victim to this more subtle temptation.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

No disguise, and no excuse

She states her purpose openly, so the fault here is Samson's.

Samson had no excuse for giving in to Delilah's flattery. But she had caught him in her net, or he would have drawn back in horror from her request. "The secret of God, the possession of His confidence, is the highest of all privileges. To betray it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position in which His grace has placed us: it is to lose it."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

His answer: a boast, not the truth

Samson neither tells the truth nor walks away. He answers with a boast about an old victory.

Have you boasted of some past victory in such a way that it has become the start of a fresh trap? Samson here is thinking of his past victory over the Philistines, how he snapped the cords. He says, I will do it again... And so he did — he broke the cords, but he now had a fresh cord around his soul. It was boasting in a past victory in front of someone who had no business knowing anything about it — and he had no business being with her at all.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why uncut hair meant strength

Nothing in nature links long hair to power. The link was obedience to what God had commanded.

There might have seemed little connection between uncut hair and all-conquering strength. But God was in it. A God who is obeyed and honoured is a God of strength to us. This was God's strength, given to a man who recognised Him so clearly. It was a gift he kept only by obeying — by staying true to the vow of separation to God that he had taken.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same secret holds for anyone serving God today, and the danger to it is quiet, not loud.

The secret of his strength is what we have been seeing all through. It is the secret of a judged self, of weakness, of utter helplessness leaning on almighty strength... there is no power he need fear so much as hidden alliances with what is not according to God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same question, better asked

The same question can be put to Christ Himself.

We must now ask our beloved Lord Delilah's question: "Please tell me the secret of where your great strength lies." The answer comes at once. He always walked His pathway with the "joy of the Lord" as His strength.

Modernised from Dr. Daniel W. PatersonOriginal wording

Summary

- The secret is separation. Samson's power was never muscle; it rested wholly on his consecration to God, marked by uncut hair.

- The secret stays hidden. His enemies saw the effects but not the source, so they had to buy the answer from someone close to him.

- The secret draws enticement. Where the enemy cannot frighten a servant of God, he charms him — and front-line men fall to that more easily.

- The secret dies when you tell it. To hand God's confidence to a stranger is to despise the position grace gave you, and so to lose it.

- The secret is safest in Christ. Ask Him Delilah's question, and the answer comes at once: the joy of the Lord was His strength.

Judges 16:7 · Darby

And Samson said to her, If they should bind me with seven fresh cords which have not been dried, then should I be weak, and be as another man.

The Philistine rulers have paid Delilah to find out where Samson's strength comes from. His first answer is a lie dressed up as a confession. Why would a man who could see the trap still play with it?

The Answer He Gave

Older translations call the ESV's "fresh bowstrings" "green withs". One writer looks at what the words mean and at how little Samson meant by them:

He first of all tells her an untruth, when she asks to know the secret of his strength and how he might be bound. What he first tells her is plainly not serious. He seems to have no intention of letting her know the real secret of things. He says, If they will bind me with seven green withs — the margin says seven new cords that were never dried — then I shall be as weak as another man.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

He was not fooled about who wanted him tied up:

Samson should certainly have seen the motive behind Delilah's demand. Who would want him stripped of strength except the Philistines? In fact, he very likely did see it, for he deceived her with his answer (v. 7).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the Enemy Had Not Taken

Samson had failed often before this. Yet one part of him had still not gone over to the enemy.

It seems strange, almost unthinkable, that a man who had failed as openly as Samson should still have a heart whose citadel was on the right side. It was not in the hands of the enemy, although it had been unfaithful time and again. But the stronghold, the inmost soul of the man, was still for God, who in mercy had so far stepped in on his behalf. Now Delilah lays siege to that citadel of his heart. She means to get the key from him, so that the enemy may rush in and take full possession.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Lie Built on an Old Victory

The false answer was not random. Samson reached back to a fight he had already won — and that reaching cost him more than he knew.

Samson here is thinking of his past victory over the Philistines, how he snapped the cords. He says, I will do it over again. I will tell her just what the men of Judah did to me, and then I will show what wonderful power I have. And so he did — he broke the cords; but he had a fresh cord around his soul. It was boasting in a past victory in front of a woman who had no business knowing anything about it. He had no business being there at all. He did not tell her the truth. He did not give her the real secret of his strength. But he tampered with her, and before long she knows more.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why Hair Held the Strength

The secret she was digging for looked trivial from the outside: uncut hair. Why should that hold any strength?

Here was a man separated to God, set apart for the LORD, and so placed under a defined obedience. His hair was not to be cut. While he kept the commandment and the precept, his strength was with him. There might seem to be little connection between long or uncut hair and all-conquering strength. But God was in it, and an obeyed, honoured God is a God of strength to us. It was God's strength, given to a man who so plainly recognised Him. Keeping the gift hung on obedience — on staying true to the vow of separation to God he had taken up.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Three Rescues, Then Silence

The bowstrings snapped, and so did the next two traps. Those escapes were not Samson's cleverness.

Three things had failed to quench the power of the Spirit: the seven green withs that were never dried, the new ropes that were never used, and the seven locks of his head woven into the web. God still sustained His poor, unfaithful servant. But when he gave away his secret, the mark of his dependence gone and the bond of communion between his soul and God broken, what remained for him? All his strength had vanished. God's past deliverances, despite his moral bondage, only deceived him and lulled him into security. Three times he had got himself out at the critical moment. Why not a fourth?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret — Samson's power was never in his muscles. It lay in a vow, and his uncut hair was the sign of the obedience God tied the gift to.

- Siege — the citadel of his heart was still God's here. Delilah's whole work is to get the key to it.

- Trifling — his answer was a lie, told to a woman who had no business asking. The real cords snapped, but a fresh cord went round his soul.

- Mercy — three false answers met three rescues. God kept sustaining an unfaithful servant, and Samson read that patience as proof he could always shake himself free.

- Silence — when the secret went, communion and strength went with it. The escape that had worked three times did not work a fourth.

Judges 16:8 · Darby

Then the lords of the Philistines brought up to her seven fresh cords which had not been dried, and she bound him with them.

Samson is living with Delilah in the valley of Sorek. The Philistine rulers have paid her to find the source of his strength. Here they act at once on the false answer he gave her.

A lie told in fun

Samson does not hand over his secret here. He plays with the question, and borrows his answer from his own past.

He first tells her an untruth when she asks the secret of his strength and how he might be bound. It is clearly said in fun. He apparently has no intention of letting her know the real secret. He says, if they bind me with seven green cords that were never dried, then I shall be as weak as any other man. I have thought that Samson had this in mind: the men of Judah once bound him with cords and handed him over to the Philistines. No doubt he remembered how he snapped those cords like a strand of flax.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Behind the lie sits a boast, and the boast tied him tighter than the cords did.

Have you boasted of some past victory in such a way that it has become the start of a fresh trap? Samson here is thinking of his past victory over the Philistines, how he snapped the cords. And so he did have that power. But he had a fresh cord around his soul. It was boasting about a past victory in front of someone who had no business knowing about it. And he had no business being with her at all.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the cords cost

Delilah did not supply the cords. The Philistine rulers brought them, and they had already paid her. Their method had changed since the last time they went after Samson.

They offer this woman pay. Philistines are not too troubled about right and wrong in the way they do things. The first time, they went to one of Samson's friends with a threat: they would burn her and her father's house with fire. Now they come to this one with silver — 1,100 pieces of it. She has only to draw out of him what he had never yet disclosed: the secret of his strength.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Men waiting in the room

While Delilah tied him, armed men waited out of sight. Grant asks why they did not kill him where he lay.

When he was asleep Delilah tied him up with these cords while Philistine men were waiting. Then she called his name, telling him that the Philistines were upon him. We may wonder why the Philistines did not simply go in while he slept and kill him. But it seems they wanted to take him alive, to gloat over him in front of the crowd. Samson broke the cords as though they were mere strands of yarn.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The inner fortress still held

The cords gave way, but the Philistines were after something ropes cannot reach.

The fortress of his heart was still unbreached. It seems strange, almost unthinkable. A man who had failed as openly as Samson still had a heart whose fortress was on the right side. It was not in the hands of the enemy, although it had been unfaithful again and again. But the stronghold, the innermost soul of the man, was still for God... Now Delilah lays siege to that fortress of his heart. She wants the key, so that the enemy may rush in and take full possession.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where his strength came from

Delilah is hunting for a weakness in his body. Samson was a Nazarite — a man set apart to God, marked out by uncut hair.

The face of the true Nazarite had to be the face of a man: he had to be brave and unflinching in front of the enemy. But he also had to wear the long hair, like the hair of a woman, because all his power lay in dependence on God. This had to be the clearest of all the marks on him, even though it shamed him in the eyes of others. If he lost it, he became as weak as other men.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Why the first refusal was not enough

His reasons for refusing never changed. What wore down was his endurance.

Satan was working on the weakness of the human heart. He knew that souls are often betrayed by persistence. It was so with Samson. There was as much reason to refuse at the end as at the start. But Delilah pressed him daily with her words and urged him, until his soul was troubled to death and he told her all his heart.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Bought. The cords came from the Philistine rulers. They had learned that silver worked where threats of fire had failed.

- Borrowed. Samson's lie recycled an old victory. Showing it off to someone with no right to hear it was the first binding.

- Besieged. The ropes were never the target. Delilah laid siege to the one thing still held for God — his heart.

- Bound to God. His strength lay in dependence on God, marked by uncut hair. Lose that mark and he was as weak as other men.

- Broken down. Delilah did not argue the secret out of him. She wore it out of him by daily pressure.

Judges 16:9 · Darby

Now she had liers in wait abiding in the chamber; and she said to him, The Philistines are upon thee, Samson! And he broke the cords, as a thread of tow is broken when it touches the fire; and his strength was not known.

A bedroom becomes a trap. Men wait in the inner room, and Delilah shouts a warning she arranged herself. Samson snaps his bonds and never learns that she betrayed him. The verse leaves us with a puzzle — Samson lied, yet his strength held. Why did God still stand by him?

The cords and the hidden men

The ESV calls the cords "fresh bowstrings." An older translation calls them "green withs." One reference book explains the word:

Slender twigs twisted into a rope. Judges 16:7-9.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The men in the inner room were not there to kill him but to capture him, and they had to run for it:

We may wonder why the Philistines did not simply go in while he slept and kill him. But it seems they wanted to take him alive to gloat over him before the crowd. Samson broke the cords as though they were mere strands of yarn. Of course the men would quickly get out of there!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

An answer borrowed from an old victory

Samson's answer reached back to an earlier escape from cords. That memory cost him.

Have you boasted of some past victory in such a way that it has become the beginning of a fresh snare? Samson here is thinking of his past victory over the Philistines, how he snapped the cords. He says, I will do it over again... And so he did — he broke the cords, but he had a fresh cord around his soul. It was just that boasting in a past victory in the presence of one who had no business to know anything about it, and in whose presence he had no business at all.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Playing with the trap instead of leaving it

Lies bought Samson time. They did not get him out of the room.

There was no excuse for Samson in giving in to Delilah's charms. He did not want to tell her his secret. But he could not give up his pleasures, so he used one dodge after another to keep it. His fatal mistake was that he played with the temptress instead of resisting her. So she drove him out of his refuge of lies again and again. At last she found the way into his strong fortress. Then, without a struggle, he fell into the hands of the Philistines.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The same danger reaches past Samson:

Playing with what is not of God is no help to my communion with Him. Trifling with it, or linking the things of God with the things of the world, will end in shipwreck and ruin, just as Samson found.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the strength held

The cords broke because the real bond had not yet been cut. The mark of his dependence on God was still in place.

Three attempts had failed to quench the power of the Spirit: the seven green withs that were never dried, the new ropes that no one had ever used, and the seven locks of his head woven into the web. God still sustained His poor, unfaithful servant. But then he gave away his secret. That removed the mark of his dependence and destroyed the bond of communion between his soul and God. What was left for him? All his strength had vanished.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The secret of his strength

The verse ends with the secret still safe. One writer weighs what such a secret is worth:

Holding a friend's secret, and keeping it, proves you are close to him. But the secret of God, having His confidence, is the highest of all privileges. To betray it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position His grace has given us. It is to lose that position. What have the enemies of God to do with the secret of God? It was in this way that Samson gave himself up to his enemies. No attempt against him had any power as long as he kept his Nazirite separation to God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The danger in a rescue

Verse 9 ends in triumph, and that is the trap. The escape taught him nothing, and the next time he would answer more easily.

He takes one step after another, coming nearer and nearer to the cliff. At last he plunges over it recklessly. Each step taken makes the next easier. With each one his eyes are more completely sealed. Then, when his ruin is complete, he is unaware of it until the consequences overtake him.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret kept. The secret of his strength was not known. While it held, no cord could hold him.

- Secret shared. God's confidence is the highest of privileges; handing it to an enemy is the way to lose it.

- Secret toyed with. He would not tell the truth, and he would not walk away. He played with the trap.

- Secret narrowed. Each dodge brought him a step closer to the edge, and each step made the next one easier.

- Secret gone. Boasting of an old victory put a fresh cord around his soul. When the bond with God went, the strength went too.

Judges 16:10 · Darby

And Delilah said to Samson, Behold, thou hast mocked me and told me lies. Now tell me, I pray thee, with what thou mightest be bound.

Samson's first lie has just collapsed. Delilah now accuses him of making a fool of her, and she asks the same question again. The startling thing is not her persistence but his: he keeps answering, and treats a question about his own capture as a game.

Enticement, Not Force

The Philistine rulers had told Delilah to entice Samson. That one word explains how a strong man was undone by a conversation.

Notice the word "entice"; it is the same word used by Samson's "companions" at the marriage feast. It reveals the secret of how Satan works. He will terrify where he can. When that fails, he always turns to enticement. Many a servant of the Lord has stood in the front line of the battle. By God's grace he never flinched under Satan's fiercest assaults. Yet afterwards he fell an easy victim to this more subtle kind of temptation.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A Second Question, A Second Lie

Samson's escape from the bowstrings was a mercy meant to wake him. His answer about new ropes shows he read it as a licence instead.

The next time he gets a little stronger. Let them bind me with ropes. He is getting stronger, and, if he only knew it, he is adding another cord to those that were to bind him. He has gone further down the road. In that I think we see God's mercy laying His hand on him, to bring him back and restore him, even though he refuses to listen. Instead he takes a deeper step into evil. So with these ropes he is now bound. If he breaks loose again, he is held more tightly than before. He tampers a second time, after his conscience has been awakened — and above all, awakened a second time by the mercy of God. He still goes on with the thing. That shows the man to be in greater danger than ever before.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Answering At All

Samson never told Delilah the truth, so on the surface his secret was safe. Yet the danger lay in the bargaining itself, not in the secret.

Wherever a person tampers with evil, wherever he has anything to do with it at all — answering it, even if the answer is a wrong one, keeping some separation in the soul and yet at the same time being linked with it — the step has been taken, and the soul is in the hands of the enemy.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Delilah is accusing a man whose judgment had already failed. She had shown her hand once, and he acted as if she had not.

He should have known by now that she was working with the Philistines to destroy him. But his feelings had blunted his judgment.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Refuge Of Lies

Delilah asked outright how he could be tied up. Samson's lies were not a defence of his secret. They were a way to keep the secret and the woman at the same time.

Samson was not willing to reveal it. He could not give up his pleasures, so he used one evasion after another to keep it. His fatal mistake was that he played with the temptress instead of resisting her. So he was hunted out of his refuge of lies again and again. At last the way into his strong fortress was found, and without a struggle he fell into the hands of the Philistines.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Strength That Survived Three Lies

Samson's strength held through all three bindings. The reason was not Samson himself.

Three things had failed to quench the power of the Spirit: the seven fresh bowstrings that had never been dried, the new ropes that had never been used, and the seven locks of his head woven into the web. God still sustained His poor, unfaithful servant. Despite his moral bondage, God had delivered him in the past. Those past deliverances only deceived him and lulled him into a false sense of safety.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Worn Down By Repetition

This is the second time Delilah asks. The method is to ask again until the man is too tired to refuse.

By this device Satan brought about the fall of Samson in an earlier day. Delilah "pressed him hard with her words day after day, and urged him," until "his soul was vexed to death." In the end Samson gave way before the persistence of his treacherous wife and "told her all his heart." The devil knows the weakness of human nature. Under persistent pressure it will often betray the saint into giving way from sheer weariness.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Enticed, not attacked. Satan terrifies where he can. Where he cannot, he charms. Samson stood through open assault and fell to a friendly question.

- Answered, not refused. Samson never told the truth, yet answering at all was the surrender. Bargain with evil while keeping a little inward distance, and you are already in the enemy's hand.

- Hidden, not escaped. Each evasion was a hiding place. He was hunted out of it again and again, because he wanted the secret and the sin.

- Rescued, not warned. Three escapes showed God still sustaining him. Samson read them as proof he was safe. Past deliverances became the very thing that lulled him.

- Pressed, not persuaded. The devil's simplest device is repetition. Human nature gives way from sheer weariness. So the second question is the one to refuse.

Judges 16:11 · Darby

And he said to her, If they should bind me fast with new ropes, with which no work has been done, then should I be weak, and be as another man.

Delilah has already tied Samson up once and shouted that the Philistines were on him. Her aim is no secret. Yet he answers her again, handing her a second false recipe for his own capture. The real question is not why the ropes failed, but why he lay down beside the same trap twice.

A Second Answer That Binds Him Tighter

His first answer named fresh bowstrings. This one names something stronger. One writer sees that escalation as Samson's own work: each answer adds a strand to the rope that will hold him:

The next time he gets a little stronger. If he only knew it, he is simply adding another cord to those with which he was to be bound. He has got on further in the downward way. I think we see God's mercy in that, laying His hand on him to bring him back and restore him. But he refuses to listen, and takes a deeper step into evil. So here with these ropes he is now bound, and if he breaks himself loose again, he is more tightly held than he was before.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Fatal Mistake: Playing Along

Samson never means to tell the truth here. So was the lie the failure? One writer puts it earlier — in the fact that he is playing along at all:

There was no excuse for Samson in yielding himself to the flattery of Delilah. But she had caught him in her trap, or he would have drawn back in horror from her request. "The secret of God, the possession of His confidence, is the highest of all privileges. To betray it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position in which His grace has placed us: it is to lose it." Samson did not want to reveal it. He could not give up his pleasures, so he used one excuse after another to keep it. His fatal mistake was that he played with the temptress instead of resisting her. The result was that he was hunted out again and again from his refuge of lies, until at last the way into his strong fortress was found.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

One writer applies that loss to the reader:

If the soul's separation from the spirit of the world breaks down, the secret is given up. You have handed your secret to the enemy. And just as surely, you have lost your strength; you have lost all spiritual power.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Escapes That Only Deceived Him

Samson breaks the new ropes too. One writer asks what that escape really proved:

Three bindings had not been able to quench the power of the Spirit: the seven green cords that had never been dried, the new ropes that had never been used, and the seven locks of his head woven with the loom. God still sustained His poor, unfaithful servant. But when his secret was made known, the mark of his dependence removed, the bond of communion between his soul and God broken, what was left for him? All his strength had vanished. Despite his moral bondage, God had delivered him in the past. Those deliverances only deceived him and lulled him into a false sense of safety. Three times he had got himself free at the critical moment. Why not a fourth?

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Strength Held on a Condition

Samson says he would be weak, like any other man. He lies about the method, not about the principle. The strength was never his own. But why should it hang on uncut hair?

There was one separated to God, set apart for the LORD. He was therefore placed under a defined obedience: his hair was not to be cut. While he kept the command, his strength was with him. There might have seemed little connection between long or uncut hair and all-conquering strength. But God was in it. A God we obey and honour is a God of strength to us. It was God's strength, given to a man who clearly recognised Him. It was a gift, and keeping it hung on obedience — on staying true to the vow of separation to God that he had taken.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Warning in a Second Chance Wasted

Here is a man going back to a snare he has already escaped. The escape should have taught him. Instead it dulled him:

Has God ever used your conscience to deliver you from a snare, and yet you have gone back to that same snare? Then I know your conscience is less sensitive than it was before, just as Samson's was.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Gift — Samson's strength was God's, given to a man set apart to Him, and held on the condition of obedience to the vow.

- Game — He never means to betray that secret. His fatal mistake is playing with the temptress instead of resisting her.

- Grip — Every fresh answer adds another cord. He breaks the new ropes, and is held tighter than before.

- Grace misread — Three escapes were God still sustaining an unfaithful servant. Samson read them as safety: three times free, why not a fourth?

- Grief — A conscience that has escaped a snare and walks back into it comes back less sensitive than it went.

Judges 16:12 · Darby

And Delilah took new ropes, and bound him with them, and said to him, The Philistines are upon thee, Samson! Now there were liers in wait abiding in the chamber. And he broke them from off his arms like a thread.

Samson has already broken one set of bindings, and instead of walking away he stays and plays the game again. Delilah asks again, he gives another false answer, and men wait in hiding for the ropes to hold — yet he snaps the new ropes like thread.

A lie built on an old victory

Samson's answer reaches back to a past victory, when ropes had already failed to hold him.

Have you boasted of some past victory in such a way that it has become the beginning of a fresh snare? Samson here is thinking of his past victory over the Philistines, how he snapped the cords... And so he did — he broke the cords, but, dear friends, he had a fresh cord around his soul. It was simply boasting about a past victory in front of someone who had no business knowing anything about it. And he had no business being with her at all. He did not tell her the truth. He did not give her the real secret of his strength. But he tampered with her, and in a little while she knows more.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the ropes still snapped

The ropes fail. One writer counts three such escapes, then asks what was left once Samson told the secret.

Three things could not quench the power of the Spirit. They were the seven fresh bowstrings that had never been dried, the new ropes that had never been used, and the seven locks of his head woven into the web. God still sustained His poor, unfaithful servant. But then he told the secret. That removed the mark of his dependence. It broke the bond of communion between his soul and God. What was left for him? All his strength had vanished.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Each escape ties a tighter cord

Breaking free looks like success. One writer reads the second escape as God's mercy reaching for Samson, and as a step further down.

The next time he gets a little stronger. Let them bind me with ropes. He is getting stronger, and, if he only knew it, he is simply adding another cord to the ones he is to be bound with. He has gone further down the road. I think we see God's mercy laying His hand on him, to bring him back and restore him. Yet he refuses to listen to that mercy... Here he tampers a second time, after his conscience has been awakened — and above all, awakened a second time by the mercy of God. He still goes on with the thing. That shows the man to be in greater danger than ever before.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer traces the same downward steps, and what they do to a man's eyes.

He takes one step after another, drawing nearer and nearer to the cliff. At last he throws himself over it recklessly. Each step taken makes the next easier. Each step seals his eyes further. Then, when his ruin is complete, he is unaware of it until the consequences catch up with him.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Blind to an obvious trap

Twice now men have waited in hiding at Delilah's call. Anyone could read that. Samson does not.

Delilah sells herself to the Philistine lords to trap the champion of Israel, who is now led astray by his lusts. Otherwise the repeated efforts to seize him would have opened his eyes to her trickery and their murderous hatred... Such is the blinding power of sin; for was he ignorant of her vileness, or of his own danger?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the ropes could never reach

No binding works, because his strength was never in his arms. It hung on one thing, and that is what Delilah is hunting.

Here was a man separated to God, set apart for the Lord. That placed him under defined obedience: his hair was not to be cut. While he kept the command, his strength was with him. There might have seemed little connection between uncut hair and all-conquering strength. But God was in it, and a God who is obeyed and honoured is a God of strength to us. It was God's strength, given to a man who recognised Him so clearly. Keeping that gift hung on obedience — on staying true to the vow of separation he had taken.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Ridout turns the scene into a rule that reaches well past Samson.

Any playing with what is not of God, which is no help to my communion with Him, will in the end bring shipwreck and ruin. So will any trifling with it. So will any linking of the things of God with the things of the world — just as Samson found.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret. Samson's strength rested on obedience to his vow of separation to God. That is the secret Delilah is after.

- Trifling. He answers with a lie drawn from an old victory. He keeps the real secret back, but he stays where he should not be.

- Rescue. The ropes snap, but that is God still sustaining an unfaithful servant, not approval of the game.

- Warning. Each escape is mercy knocking. Refused, it becomes another cord. Every step down makes the next one easier.

- Blindness. Two ambushes should have opened his eyes. Sin sealed them instead, and ruin came before he knew it.

Judges 16:13 · Darby

And Delilah said to Samson, Hitherto thou hast mocked me and told me lies. Tell me with what thou mightest be bound. And he said to her, If thou shouldest weave the seven locks of my head with the web.

The answer that came close

Samson has already put Delilah off twice with a lie about cords and ropes. This third reply is different: for the first time he names his hair.

Then comes his third answer to her. He is still trifling with her, but the moth is drawing ever closer to the candle, and now he touches what is the secret of his strength. He says, if you weave the seven locks of my head with the web. He is speaking about his hair; he is not going to tell her that if they shave off that hair, or anything of that kind. But the hair was the source of his strength. Now you can see how close he had come to giving away the secret of it… He is telling her falsely, but he is talking about the very thing.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the seven locks stood for

The hair itself was not the power. It was the sign of a vow: Samson was a Nazarite, a man consecrated to God, and uncut hair was the mark of it.

Samson's great strength lay in his seven locks. They were the symbol of his unbroken vow — of his consecration to God… While Samson's seven locks stayed uncut, no enemy could gain any advantage over him. The Spirit remained in power with him, so long as he kept the secret of his communion with God. But alas, alas, how difficult for a Nazarite to retain his locks in the lap of Delilah!

Modernised from Andrew MillerOriginal wording

Why speaking of it at all was the failure

Even a false answer about the locks was a step too far. Ridout puts it in everyday terms:

It is as if a man were talking to the world about his faith. He may not quite give away the secret itself. He may not be fully joined to the world, but he is talking about the one thing that separates him from the world. What right had Samson to talk to a Philistine about his Nazarite vow? None at all.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer states the principle behind that:

To hold a secret and keep it proves close friendship. But the secret of God — having His confidence — is the highest of all privileges. To betray it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position in which His grace has placed us; it is to lose it. What have the enemies of God to do with the secret of God? That is how Samson gave himself up to his enemies.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Three escapes that taught him nothing

Samson broke free from the loom just as he had broken the cords. The rescues were real, and they were God's — but they became the very thing that made him careless.

Three attempts had failed to quench the power of the Spirit: the seven green cords that were never dried, the new ropes that were never used, and the seven locks of his head woven with the web. God still sustained His poor, unfaithful servant… Despite his moral bondage, his past experience of God's deliverances only deceived him. It lulled him into a sense of security. Three times he had freed himself at a critical moment. Why not a fourth?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Where trifling with evil ends

Verse 13 is not the end of the story. What begins as playing with the truth ends with handing it over.

So he takes the last step. She will have it all out of him. You may be sure of this. Anyone who plays with evil, anyone who tampers with it, will go all the way with it, unless God in His mercy steps in. That is what poor Samson did here.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The outward sign without the inward one

The Nazarite vow covered three things — no wine, no contact with death, and uncut hair. Samson mentions only the last.

Is it not significant that he does not speak of his abstinence from wine, or separation from death? His past life would show that he had not been careful about those parts of his Nazarite separation. The long hair suggested conscious weakness, a spirit of dependence on God. Is it not possible for these to remain after a man has lost the holy separation of heart?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- The secret — Samson's strength lay in a vow, not in muscle. The seven locks were the symbol of his consecration. While they stayed uncut, no enemy could touch him.

- The slippage — Two lies were about ropes. This one names his hair. He is still lying, yet he is now discussing the very thing that separates him from his enemies.

- The sin — Handing God's secret to a stranger is not a small slip. It despises the place grace gave you, and it loses it.

- The sparing — He broke the loom just as he broke the cords, because God kept sustaining an unfaithful servant. But past rescues became a pillow. He assumed there would always be a fourth.

- The surrender — Whoever plays with evil goes the whole distance unless God intervenes. You can keep the outward sign of dependence long after the heart's separation is gone.

Judges 16:14 · Darby

And she fastened it with the pin, and said to him, The Philistines are upon thee, Samson! And he awoke out of his sleep, and tore out the pin of the beam, and the web.

Delilah has demanded Samson's secret twice, and twice he has lied. His third answer comes far closer to the truth, and he still gets away — which is the very thing that deceives him.

The Answer That Comes Too Close

The first two replies were about cords and ropes — things outside himself. This one is about his hair, and one commentator marks the shift.

He is still playing games with her, but the moth is drawing ever closer to the candle. Now he touches the secret of his strength. He is speaking about his hair... But the hair was the source of his strength, and now you can see how near he had drawn to disclosing the secret of it. He is talking about his own spiritual strength, and he is telling her, as it were, how that strength can be taken from him. He is telling her falsely, but he is talking about the very thing. It is as though a man were talking to the world about his faith. He may not fully belong to the world. But he is talking about the one thing that separates him from it. What right had Samson to talk to a Philistine about his Nazirite vow? None at all. It reminds us of Eve talking with the serpent.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A lie that circles the truth is still a conversation about the truth.

Why the Hair and Not the Wine

A Nazirite was a man set apart to God by a vow: uncut hair, no wine. Of all the parts of that vow, hair is the one Samson reaches for.

Is it not significant that he does not speak of his abstinence from wine, or separation from death? His past life suggests that he had not been careful about those parts of his Nazirite separation. The long hair spoke of conscious weakness and a spirit of dependence on God. Is it not possible for these to remain after the holy separation of heart has been lost?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The outward sign can outlive the inward reality. Another writer draws out what that sign meant to the onlookers:

His strength stayed a mystery to his enemies. They saw what it could do, but only as it struck them. That made them all the more eager to tear the secret out of him. They wanted to know what weapons would work against this servant of the LORD. His long hair, a look no one else had, was also a public declaration of separation to God. But if he had not given his secret away, the world would never have guessed the truth. What pictured dependence and self-forgetfulness was, for the Nazirite, the source of his strength.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Secret Not Meant for Strangers

Samson held on to his secret, but he held it with excuses instead of walking away.

"The secret of God, the possession of His confidence, is the highest of all privileges. To betray it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position His grace has placed us in. It is to lose it." Samson was not willing to reveal it. Unable to give up his pleasures, he used one excuse after another to keep it. His fatal mistake was to play with the temptress instead of resisting her. So they hunted him out of one refuge of lies after another, until at last they found the way into his stronghold.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Verse 14 is one of those refuges of lies.

The Escape That Deceived Him

The loom gives way, the pin comes out, and nothing appears to have changed. That appearance is the trap.

Three times the power of the Spirit held. Seven fresh bowstrings that had never been dried, new ropes that had never been used, the seven locks of his head woven with the web — none of these could quench it. God still sustained His poor, unfaithful servant. God had delivered him before, even while he was in moral bondage. Those past rescues only deceived him and lulled him into feeling safe. Three times he had got himself out at a critical moment. Why not a fourth?

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Surviving a sin is not the same as being clear of it.

Where Dallying Ends

Verse 14 is not a stopping place; it is the step before the last step.

So he takes the last step. She will have it all out of him. You may be sure that anyone who plays with evil, who tampers with it, will go the whole length of it, just as poor Samson did here, unless God in His mercy steps in. Yes, he says, take my hair. That is the point. He has come to the end, and if my hair goes, if my Nazirite separation is lost, I shall be as weak as any other man.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

And the loom is worked while he sleeps — a detail one writer turns into a general warning:

The saint's sleeping time is Satan's tempting time. Every fly dares to creep on a sleeping lion. Even the weakest temptation is strong enough to overthrow a Christian who is napping in false security. Samson asleep, and Delilah cut his locks.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Nearer. Each answer brings Samson closer to the real secret. The third names his hair — the one thing that separates him from the world.

- Sign. The long hair stood for dependence on God and self-forgetfulness. That is why the world could never guess it was his source of strength.

- Secret. Holding God's confidence is the highest privilege; handing it to a stranger is to despise it, and to lose it.

- Sleep. Delilah weaves while Samson sleeps. Even the weakest temptation can overthrow a believer who naps in false security.

- Snare. Three escapes did not teach him; they lulled him. One lie after another is hunted out, until at last his enemies find the way in.

Judges 16:15 · Darby

Then she said to him, How canst thou say, I love thee, when thy heart is not with me? these three times hast thou mocked me, and hast not told me in what is thy great strength.

Delilah has already tried three times to bind Samson, and each time he has escaped. Now she changes tactics. Instead of asking for his secret, she attacks his love for her. She uses the word "love" to pry at the one thing he has never given away.

The Demand of a Woman Who Had No Love

Her complaint is that his love cannot be real while he keeps something back. One writer weighs that complaint against her own record, and adds a warning for anyone who stays in such a tie.

She kept pressing him daily, asking him how he could say he loved her when he withheld this information from her (v. 15). Of course this was hypocrisy, for she had proved she had no love for him. But if we stay in evil relationships we will soon give in to evil.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Heart Already Divided

Delilah says his heart is not with her. A writer finds a deeper division behind that, and explains why it could not last.

Samson loved Delilah. His heart was divided, and God could not go on with this. It is impossible for our affections to go out to the world and likewise to God. "No servant can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other" (Luke 16:13). In loving Delilah, Samson as much as said that he hated and despised God; when, in actual fact, he belonged to Him. This woman's influence over him increased more and more. From then on his heart was taken captive, and before long he gave up his whole secret.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the Enemy Was Really After

The Philistines had felt Samson's strength but could not explain it. A writer shows why that unsolved puzzle made them press so hard for the secret.

Up to now Samson had guarded his close and secret relationship with God, despite everything. He had something the world could not understand, and it could not reach the source of it. His strength stayed a puzzle to his enemies. No doubt they saw its effect, but they saw it aimed at themselves. That made them all the more eager to force the secret out of him, so they could learn what weapons to use against this servant of the Lord.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Playing with the Question Instead of Refusing It

By his third answer Samson was talking about his hair. The detail he gave was false, but the subject was the real one. A writer shows what that kind of talk amounts to.

He is talking about his own spiritual strength. In effect, he is telling her how that strength can be taken from him. He is telling her falsely, but he is talking about the very thing. It is as though a man were talking to the world about his faith. He may not quite give out the secret itself. He may not be fully joined to the world, but he is talking about the one thing that keeps him apart from it. What right had Samson to talk to a Philistine about his Nazirite separation? None at all.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Worn Down by Repetition

Verse 15 is not an argument. It is pressure applied until resistance breaks. A writer sets Samson beside Nehemiah, who met the same tactic and escaped it.

Delilah "pressed him hard with her words day after day, and urged him, so that his soul was vexed to death." Finally Samson gives way under the persistence of his treacherous wife and "told her all his heart." As a result he was robbed of his strength, the Lord left him, and he fell prey to his enemies (Judges 16:15-21). The devil knows how weak human nature is. Under constant pressure it will often betray the believer into giving way from sheer weariness. Nehemiah escapes this trick by simply repeating his former answer: "I answered them in the same manner."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The One Thing at Stake

Samson's uncut hair marked him as a Nazirite — a man set apart to God. One writer names the one thing that sign was really testing.

By God's will, his unbeatable strength hung on his uncut hair. There was only one thing really involved — obedience... Do we know what obedience is in God's eyes, even when it may be shown in the simplest way? It is the perfection of the creature, giving God His place, and man his own.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Heart given. Samson's love went to a Philistine woman. A heart cannot be given to the world and to God at once.

- Heart accused. Her question is hypocrisy from a woman who had proved she had no love for him. Stay in an evil tie, and you will give in to it.

- Heart hunted. His enemies could not explain his strength, so they worked to drag its secret out of him.

- Heart worn down. Daily pressure, not argument, broke him. Nehemiah escaped by repeating the answer he had already given.

- Heart surrendered. It all came down to obedience — dependence on God shown by one simple mark, and gone the moment he gave it up.

Judges 16:16 · Darby

And it came to pass when she pressed him daily with her words and urged him, that his soul was vexed unto death;

Delilah has already asked Samson three times where his strength lies, and three times he has lied to her. Now she changes weapons: no force and no cleverness, just daily pressure, until he is worn out and sick of living.

Pressure as a weapon

Delilah does not defeat Samson by argument. She refuses to stop asking. One writer sets this beside Nehemiah, who met the same tactic from his enemies and survived it:

Nehemiah gave a firm answer, but the enemy would not be put off. He repeats the same demand "four times." Satan used this trick to bring about Samson's fall in an earlier day. Delilah "pressed him hard with her words day after day, and urged him," until "his soul was vexed to death." Finally Samson gives way to the persistence of his treacherous wife and "told her all his heart." This robbed him of his strength. The Lord departed from him, and he fell as prey to his enemies (Judges 16:15-21). The devil knows how weak human nature is. Under constant pressure it will often betray the believer into giving way out of sheer weariness. Nehemiah escapes this trick by repeating his former answer, as he says, "I answered them after the same manner."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A dull defence, but it holds. What was true the first time is still true the fourth.

Where the pressure found him

The pressure worked because of where Samson was standing. Both the valley and the woman carry names, and one writer reads them:

Grace resisted hardens the heart. Samson has still not learned his lesson, and we find him now in the vale of Sorek — "entanglement." No strong city holds him here. There is nothing but a weak woman's arms, and they are stronger than the gates of Gaza. Delilah means "exhausted, weak." We are often overcome by what looks weak to us, for here at least we credit ourselves with a strength we do not have… He takes one step after another, drawing nearer and nearer to the cliff he plunges over at last. Each step taken makes the next one easier. With each one his eyes are more completely sealed.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Playing with the secret

His three false answers were not innocent games. By the third he was circling the truth, talking about his hair with the woman who had trapped him:

He is still playing with her, but the moth is drawing ever closer to the candle. Now he touches the real secret of his strength… But the hair was the source of his strength. You can see how near he had come to giving that secret away. He is talking about his own spiritual strength. In effect, he is telling her how to take that strength from him. He is telling her falsely, but he is talking about the very thing. It is as though a man were talking to the world about his faith. He may not quite give out the secret itself. He has not fully joined the world, but he is talking about the one thing that separates him from it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Vexed to death — and why

Samson got what he wanted, and it is killing him:

Samson was not very happy under Delilah's yoke. "When she pressed him hard with her words day after day, and urged him, his soul was vexed to death" (v. 16). That was all he got from what had attracted him most! He would gladly have refused, but he was no longer able to. A man of the world may find his joy in the world; a believer, never. Deep down, Samson's heart was in some measure with God and with the Israel of God. From that fact came all this conflict, struggle, vexation and misery. Our conscience speaks and we have no real rest; our joy is spoiled.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What he handed over

The next verse says he "told her all his heart." One writer weighs what that betrayal really cost:

The secret of God, the possession of His confidence, is the highest of all privileges. To betray it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position His grace has placed us in: it is to lose it.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The loss he could not feel

Samson's strength came from his Nazarite separation — a life set apart to God. Here is what he lost with it:

As long as he kept his Nazarite separation he was unbeatable, for the power of God worked with great force through His servant. But once he lost this, he was weak, like any other man. And not only that — "he did not know that the LORD had left him." The surest sign of backsliding is not knowing your own condition. The backslider slowly gets used to losing the enjoyment of the Lord's presence.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Pressure. Satan's weapon here is not argument but repetition. Constant pressure makes people give way out of sheer weariness.

- Position. It worked because Samson was already in "entanglement," the valley where each step made the next one easier.

- Proximity. He kept talking about the one thing that marked him off from the world, and the moth drew closer to the candle.

- Pain. The thing he wanted most left his soul vexed to death, because a believer can never find real joy in the world.

- Poverty. Telling the secret cost him the place grace had given him. The worst sign of the loss: he did not know it had happened.

Judges 16:17 · Darby

and he told her all his heart, and said to her, There has not come a razor upon my head; for I am a Nazarite of God from my mother's womb; if I should be shaven, then my strength would go from me, and I should be weak, and be like all mankind.

Samson's last defence falls here. Worn down by Delilah, he hands over the secret that had kept him unbeatable: his hair had never been cut. So where did his strength come from, and why did telling it end it?

Pressure, Not Force

Delilah did not overpower Samson. She wore him down by asking day after day.

Satan used this same trick — asking again and again — to bring about Samson's fall long ago. Delilah "pressed him hard with her words day after day, and urged him," until "his soul was vexed to death." In the end Samson gave way to the persistence of his treacherous wife and "told her all his heart." He lost his strength, the Lord left him, and he fell prey to his enemies. The devil knows how weak human nature is. Under constant pressure it will often betray the believer into giving way from sheer weariness.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

He had wanted to refuse and could not. And what the telling cost him went far beyond his hair.

But when he gave away his secret, the mark of his dependence went with it, and the bond between his soul and God ended. What was left for him? All his strength had vanished... He would gladly have refused, but he was no longer able to. A man of the world may find his joy in the world; a believer, never.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the Hair Mattered

a Nazirite — someone set apart to God by vow — Samson wore in public a sign that would have looked like humiliation to anyone else.

Man is selfish by nature, and nothing matters more to him than himself and his own dignity. Long hair separated the Nazirite, as a picture, from all that. It was at the same time the sign of dependence and of dishonour. The long hair declared openly that he had given up his dignity and personal rights as a man, to devote himself to the service of God... Without this dependence there can be neither service for God nor power for it. What was a sign of weakness for the Nazirite became the source of his strength.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Paul learned the same lesson.

The Apostle Paul was a true Nazirite when he wrote: "I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me... For when I am weak, then I am strong." He had learned that complete dependence meant true power. The Lord had said to him: "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness."

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

A Secret Handed to a Stranger

Samson never meant to tell her. He played with the danger instead of ending it.

"The secret of God, the possession of His confidence, is the highest of all privileges. To betray it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position His grace has given us. It is to lose it." Samson indeed was not willing to reveal it... His fatal mistake was that he toyed with the temptress instead of resisting her.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The strength was never magic in the hair. It hung on one thing, and God stayed true to it.

His unbeatable strength hung on his uncut hair, because God had willed it so. Only one thing was really involved — obedience... Whatever his low state through unchecked appetites, whatever his failures before, God's strength never failed him while he kept the secret with God. The strain made no difference. The Lord at least stayed true to the secret; He could not do otherwise.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Like Any Other Man"

His own words name what he lost.

Up to this point his path had been one of strength and victory. That was because it had been a path of holy Nazirite separation. But Delilah's lap proved too much for Samson's heart. One woman's trap did what a thousand Philistines could not do. Samson fell from the high position of the Nazirite down to the level of an ordinary man.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What He Did Not Mention

He mentions the razor only. The rest of his vow goes unmentioned.

Is it not significant that he does not speak of his abstinence from wine, or separation from death? His past life shows that he had not been careful about those parts of his Nazirite separation. The long hair suggested conscious weakness and a spirit of dependence on God. Is it not possible for these to remain after the heart has lost its holy separation?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Dependence — the uncut hair was a public sign that Samson had given up his own rights to belong to God. The mark of weakness was the source of his strength.

- Pressure — no enemy overpowered him. Delilah's daily asking wore him down until he gave way from sheer weariness.

- Betrayal — sharing God's secret with a stranger is despising the place grace gave you, and losing it.

- Faithfulness — his failures never stopped the strength. It went only when he gave the secret away, for God stayed true to it longer than Samson did.

- Descent — set apart from birth, he ends the verse calling himself ordinary. That is what he became.

Judges 16:18 · Darby

And Delilah saw that he had told her all his heart, and she sent and called for the lords of the Philistines, saying, Come up this time, for he has told me all his heart. And the lords of the Philistines came up to her, and brought the money in their hand.

Samson had lied to Delilah again and again about the source of his strength. This time she knows the lying has stopped, and the Philistine rulers arrive with the payment already counted out.

The secret told

Twice over, the verse says Samson told her all his heart. A shared secret is the proof of a close friendship, and the highest secret of all belongs to God.

To hold a secret and keep it proves you are close to a friend. But the secret of God — having His confidence — is the highest privilege of all. To hand it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position His grace has given us. It is to lose that position. What have the enemies of God to do with the secret of God? It was in this way that Samson gave himself up to his enemies. Nothing they tried could touch him as long as he kept his Nazarite separation.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Nazarite was someone set apart to God, marked out by uncut hair.

How she knew

Delilah's earlier attempts had all failed on Samson's lies. This time she sends for the rulers without testing him first. She could tell the difference.

He had told her so many lies that the Philistines did not believe him any more; but, dear friends, she believed him. This wretched prostitute of a world knows when you have told your secret. It knows well when the Christian has given up separation from it. It knows when everything has broken down.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The price in their hands

The rulers bring silver with them, and the size of the payment says something about the woman who took it.

A Philistine prostitute from the valley of Sorek, loved by Samson. The Philistines bribed her, and she teased Samson until he told her where his great strength lay (Judges 16:4-18). The size of the reward offered her — 5,500 shekels — makes it likely that she was a political courtesan. We wonder at Samson's folly. He had plenty of proof of what she was planning. But he was far from God, so his light had become darkness — and how great that darkness was! The "lap of Delilah" should be a clear warning to everyone.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Worn down, not overpowered

Samson was not overpowered. He was worn down.

Satan used the trick of constant asking to bring about the fall of Samson in an earlier day. Delilah pressed him with her words day after day until he was sick to death of it. In the end Samson gave way to his treacherous wife's endless pressing and told her all his heart. The result was that he lost his strength. The Lord left him, and he fell prey to his enemies (Judges 16:15-21). The devil knows how weak human nature is. Under constant pressure it will often betray the believer into giving way out of sheer weariness.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The order of the losses

One loss opened the door to the next.

The Philistines sent Delilah money, and what was the next thing? Off came Samson's hair. The first thing he lost was his separation. The next thing he lost was his strength. Then he lost his liberty. This time they truly captured him. Had they not bound him before? Yes, with new ropes, but the ropes were like cobwebs to him. Next he lost his eyes, and last of all he lost his life. Lose your separation, and your strength, your liberty, your eyesight and your life all follow.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The real target

Samson's fall did not stay private. It became a public argument about whose God was stronger.

Let us not be mistaken about this. The enemy was more hostile to God than to Samson. The defeated Nazarite now looked like proof that the false god Dagon had beaten the true God. The lack of reality in Christians is the world's most powerful weapon against Christ. When the world despises the unfaithful believer, it is really Him that it gets the chance to despise.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Told — Samson gave away the secret of God. To hand that to a stranger is to despise the place grace has put you in, and to lose it.

- Sold — the rulers come with the money ready. The world pays only when it is sure the secret is out, and Delilah's fee was large enough to mark her as no ordinary hire.

- Worn down — force never broke Samson. Daily pressure did, and the enemy still counts on weariness rather than strength.

- Shorn — the losses came in order. First his separation, then his strength, then his liberty, then his eyes, then his life.

- Scorned — the target behind Samson was God Himself. An unfaithful believer becomes the world's best weapon against Christ.

Judges 16:19 · Darby

And she made him sleep upon her knees, and called a man, and she caused him to shave off the seven locks of his head; and she began to overpower him, and his strength went from him.

Judges 16:19 is the turning point of Samson's life. He falls asleep on Delilah's lap, his seven locks are cut, and his strength drains away. The verse raises the question the whole story has been circling: where did that strength come from, and what did hair have to do with it?

Sleep in the enemy's lap

The shaving does not happen to a man on guard. It happens to a man who has stopped being awake. One writer links telling the secret with falling asleep.

At last he took the final step, and "told her all his heart" (v. 17). Then came sleep: "She made him sleep on her knees" (v. 19). The soul loses all sense of its relationship with God, and falls into a heavy sleep in the polluted air of corruption. Then the enemy, waiting in ambush for this moment, moved in. They bound the strong man, put out his eyes, and treated him as one of their most miserable slaves.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

When the world learns the secret

Samson had lied to Delilah again and again, and the Philistines had stopped believing him. This time she was certain, and she acted while he slept.

He had told her so many lies that the Philistines did not believe him any more, but, dear friends, she believed him. This world is a wretched prostitute, and it knows when you have told your secret. This wretched world knows well when the Christian has given up separation from it, and when everything has broken down. After that it is a little more sleeping, a little more of the laziness he had long since fallen into. He puts his head on this poor wretched world's lap, and then all is gone. He wakes only to find his strength gone forever. Gone, not to be restored in any true sense. His strength is gone, and gone by his own fault.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the seven locks stood for

Uncut hair was the visible mark of Samson's vow as a Nazirite — a man set apart for God. One writer reads that hair against 1 Corinthians 11, where long hair is a woman's glory and a man's shame.

Long hair separated the Nazirite, as a picture, from self and personal dignity. At the same time it was the mark of dependence and of dishonour (1 Cor. 11). The long hair of the Nazirite announced that he had given up his dignity and his personal rights as a man. He did this to devote himself to the service of God. What was glory for the woman was shame for him... Without this dependence there can be neither service for God nor power for it. What was a sign of weakness for the Nazirite became the source of his strength.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Where the strength came from

Paintings give Samson a bodybuilder's frame. The verse itself argues against that reading, since a haircut is what undoes him.

In pictures Samson is always shown as a man of huge build, but that isn't the idea at all. The Philistines said to Delilah, "Entice him, and see where his great strength lies." They couldn't understand where Samson's strength came from. It didn't come from his body. It lay in his separation to God, so that "the Spirit of the LORD rushed upon him." Once Delilah had his hair shaved off, he was as weak as a child. Even Delilah "began to overpower him."

Modernised from Paul DronsfieldOriginal wording

That last phrase follows an older translation. The ESV reads that she "began to torment him."

Where the razor works today

If the long hair stands for a dependent spirit, what does losing it look like now? One writer points to a habit we drop quietly.

Dependence finds its natural and normal expression in prayer... Let us be sure of this: there is no greater danger than losing a sense of the need of prayer. Neglected private prayer means the loss of the dependent spirit — the long hair... The enemy can even use our knowledge of grace to weaken our sense of dependence, and so make prayer less constant.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The chain of losses

The losses do not stop with the hair and the strength.

He had lost his separation, and now that his strength was gone he lost his liberty. Next he lost his eyes, and last of all he lost his life. Lose your separation, and your strength, your liberty, your eyesight and your life all follow. Samson is the awful picture of a man who went right down from the top to the bottom.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret. Samson's fall began when he told the secret. The world can tell when a believer has handed it over, and it acts at once.

- Sleep. The head laid on the enemy's lap comes before the razor. The soul loses its sense of nearness to God and slips into heavy sleep.

- Shearing. The uncut hair was the badge of dependence and of accepted shame. What looked like weakness was the source of his strength.

- Strength. It never lay in his muscles but in his separation to God, so the moment the sign went, he was as weak as a child.

- Slide. Separation goes first, then strength, then liberty, then his eyes, then his life. The guard against that slide is dependence kept alive in prayer.

Judges 16:20 · Darby

And she said, The Philistines are upon thee, Samson! And he awoke out of his sleep, and thought, I will go out as at other times before, and disengage myself. And he knew not that Jehovah had departed from him.

Samson wakes from Delilah's lap and expects his old power to work as usual. It is gone. The saddest line in the story is that he did not know it had gone. So where did his strength come from? And how can a man lose God's presence without noticing?

Where the strength lay

Samson's power was never in his body. Commentators tie it to what his uncut hair stood for.

Pictures always show Samson as a man of huge build, but that isn't the idea at all. The Philistines said to Delilah, "Entice him, and see where his great strength lies." They couldn't understand where Samson's strength came from. It didn't come from his body. It lay in his separation to God, so that "the Spirit of the LORD came mightily upon him." Once they had shaved his hair off, he was as weak as a child.

Modernised from Paul DronsfieldOriginal wording

The link between hair and might looks arbitrary until you see what held it together.

Samson was separated to God, set apart for the LORD, and his hair was not to be cut. While he kept that command, his strength was with him. There might have seemed little connection between long or uncut hair and all-overcoming strength; but God was in it: and an obeyed, honoured God, is a God of strength to us.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The long road down

Nothing here happened in one night. One writer sets out the fall as a staircase:

Here are the downward steps: — He loved a woman in the valley of Sorek. Verse 4. He told her all his heart. Verse 7. She made him sleep upon her knees. Verse 19. They cut off the seven locks of his hair. Verse 19. The Lord departed from him. Verse 20. The Philistines took him. Verse 21. They put out his eyes, bound him with bronze chains, and he ground grain in the prison. Verse 21.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Why he did not know

Three earlier escapes had taught Samson the wrong lesson.

Three things had not been able to quench the power of the Spirit: the seven green branches that had never dried, the new ropes that had never been used, and the seven locks of his hair woven into the web. God still sustained His poor, unfaithful servant. But then he gave his secret away. The mark of his dependence was gone. The bond of communion between his soul and God was broken. What was left for him? All his strength had vanished. God had rescued him in the past, despite his moral bondage, and those past rescues only deceived him and lulled him into feeling safe. Three times he had got himself out at a critical moment. Why not a fourth?

Modernised from Henri RossierOriginal wording

Turpin marks the exact turning point. God helped Samson through every earlier crisis, "but the moment he gave away the secret, God helps him no more" (W. T. Turpin).

"As at other times"

One small word in his boast had quietly stopped being true.

What a sad sight Samson was, going out to shake himself, "as at other times"! Sadly, the "as" was out of place. He might shake himself, but it was no longer "as at other times." The power was gone. The Lord had left him. The once powerful Nazarite became a blind prisoner. Instead of triumphing over the Philistines, he had to grind grain in their prison. Samson never regained his freedom. Through God's mercy he was allowed one more victory over his enemies, but that victory cost him his life. God's Nazarites must keep themselves pure or lose their power. For them, power and purity cannot be separated.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The danger belongs to those with a long record of success. The beginner knows he must lean on God. The veteran "is in danger of saying with Samson, 'I will go out as at other times and shake myself'" (H. Forbes Witherby).

The wider damage

Samson's shame was not his alone.

Do not mistake this. The enemy was more hostile to God than to Samson. The beaten Nazarite now seemed to be a witness that the false god Dagon had defeated the true God. The lack of reality in Christians is the world's most powerful weapon against Christ.

Modernised from Henri RossierOriginal wording

The warning left for us

The point is not to study Samson but to check ourselves.

He did not even know that his power had gone. How many a soul has tampered with the world, and gone on tampering with it! He does not know that his spiritual strength is gone. He did not know that the Lord was not with him, and he goes out. He may shake himself, but if he has lost the secret of his strength, his dependence on God, he is as weak as the weakest.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. Samson's strength was never physical. It lay in his separation to God — and a God obeyed and honoured is a God of strength to us.

- Slide. The fall came by steps — a love, a secret told, a sleep, a shearing — not by one sudden shock.

- Sleep. Earlier rescues came in mercy while he was already compromised. They only lulled him into feeling safe.

- Self-confidence. "As at other times" was his ruin: he trusted a past pattern instead of a present God.

- Sight. He lost his power without knowing it. The surest sign of decline is not feeling it — and the world sees the emptiness before we do.

Judges 16:21 · Darby

And the Philistines seized him, and put out his eyes, and brought him down to Gazah, and bound him with fetters of bronze; and he had to grind in the prison-house.

This verse is the lowest point of Samson's life. The man raised up to break Philistine power is now blind, chained, and grinding grain for them in their own city.

The last step of a long descent

Capture was not a sudden accident. It was where a long walk away from God ended. Samson was a Nazarite — a man set apart to God, with uncut hair as the badge of it.

This was the depth of degradation to which his departure from God brought him. The one whose name means "As the sun" now grinds for the enemies of the Lord, in the blindness and darkness of his lost Nazariteship.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Gaza — chosen ground becomes prison ground

Gaza was not a new place for Samson. He had gone there once on his own feet, for his own pleasure.

The Philistines take Samson and bring him down to that very city of Gaza, where in his folly he had amused himself. They bind him and bring him down to the place he had once gone to willingly. The scene of his own willing bondage becomes the scene of his unwilling bondage too. Now he has to grind corn. The very strength he has left goes to grinding corn for the Philistines, instead of his being God's free man to judge his beloved people. What an awful warning, what an awful lesson it is for us.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The eyes that led him into sin

Commentators notice which part of him the Philistines destroyed.

And notice how God's government repays. Samson used his eyes to lust after a woman of the Philistines. The Philistines put out his eyes. Bound with bronze shackles, he ground corn in the prison. What a sad end Samson's feasting came to! True, in his death he killed more of his enemies than in his life, but he died with them.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The men who blinded him were God's enemies, yet they served His purpose.

The Philistines would rather not kill Samson, but did all they could to humiliate him. They put his eyes out, confined him in prison and gave him the hard labour of grinding. A believer today, out of communion with the Lord, may find himself humiliated by those who hate his Lord. God often uses ungodly people to discipline His own.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Grinding, when he might have been honoured

The same prison can mean two opposite things, depending on how a man came to be there.

And remember this. A person may avoid the distinctive testimony that belongs to a Christian. That cowardice is his own fault, and God may put him into the very position he is trying to dodge. He might have come into it by faithfulness, as Joseph did. Then God would have supported and honoured him. Instead, through his unfaithfulness, he may have to learn in shame with Samson the lessons God must teach His own, because He loves them.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

The enemy was aiming past Samson

The Philistines wanted more than a slave. They wanted a trophy.

Then the enemy, lying in wait for this moment, moved in. He bound the strong man, put out his eyes, and treated him as one of their most wretched slaves. Samson is now only a poor blind slave, the sport of the enemies of Jehovah. Let us not mistake this. The enemy was more hostile to God than to Samson. The defeated Nazarite now seemed to be the witness that the false god Dagon had beaten the true God. The lack of reality in Christians is the world's most powerful weapon against Christ. When the world despises an unfaithful believer, it is really Him that it gets the chance to despise.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What never grew back

His hair did grow again. But writers do not smooth over what this verse cost him.

As to Samson, his hair began to grow again. He had learnt. He was learning over again that there was no strength in himself. The badge of dependence, the badge of separation and Nazariteship, is coming back. But he has lost something that will never come again. He has lost his eyesight, and he can never regain it. God never fully restores what a person has once forfeited by his own deliberate and repeated fault. He may partially restore.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Descent. The chains came last, not first. Samson's departure from God brought him down to this depth long before the Philistines ever bound him.

- Down to Gaza. He once walked into the city for pleasure. He came back in chains, and his willing bondage became unwilling bondage.

- Eye for eye. What he had used to sin with is what he lost, and God let hostile hands do the disciplining.

- Two prisons. Joseph and Samson both sat in prison. Faithfulness put one there, and God honoured him. Unfaithfulness put the other there to grind.

- Loss that lasts. The hair grew back. At his death Samson killed more enemies than in his life, but he died with them, and his eyes never returned. God may restore in part; He does not always restore everything.

Judges 16:22 · Darby

But the hair of his head began to grow after he was shaved.

Judges 16 leaves Samson blind and a prisoner of the Philistines. Then, almost in passing, it notes that his hair started to grow back — and asks whether a man who threw away his calling can get anything back.

What the Hair Stood For

Samson's strength was never in his hair as such. The uncut hair was the visible sign of a vow — he belonged to God, and the sign held only as long as the obedience did.

Samson … was one separated to God, set apart for the Lord … his hair was not to be cut. As long as he kept the command and rule, his strength stayed with him. There might have seemed to be little connection between uncut hair and all-conquering strength. But God was in it. A God who is obeyed and honoured is a God of strength to us.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

So when the hair starts again, more than hair is returning:

As for Samson, his hair began to grow again. He had learnt. He was learning over again that there was no strength in himself. The badge of dependence, the badge of separation and Nazarite calling, is coming back…

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

How It Was Lost

The hair went because a secret went first. Samson gave away what belonged only between himself and God. The same danger faces anyone who advertises their own separation or dependence.

True Nazarite living — separation to God — is of the heart. The world sees the effects in life, joy, and power, without understanding them. But the separation itself is a secret between the soul and God. Announcing that I am separate makes others think about me. Saying that I am depending on God means I am no longer doing it, since I am taking credit to myself. By doing that I hand my secret over to the world and, like Samson, give up my flowing hair to its scissors. Once Satan and the world have learned the secret of my strength, they will not rest until they have taken it from me.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Growth Begins in the Prison

The regrowth happens in the worst place in Samson's life, and it is the point where he finally prays.

Thank God, the history of the last of the judges does not end with this defeat. God will have the final victory despite the unfaithfulness of His witnesses. Samson recovered his Nazarite calling in this state of bitter humiliation… Samson was not a man of prayer. Only twice in all his history do we hear him speaking to God. Here his enemies were celebrating their triumph. And Samson cried to the Lord… Samson's end was a splendid victory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Notice the word "began". What came next was not instant:

We must begin over again. It took time for Samson to recover, along with his hair, the strength to pull down the pillars in Dagon's temple.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Real Recovery, Permanent Loss

The verse gives back the hair. It does not give back the eyes.

He has lost his eyesight, and he can never get it back. That is because God never fully restores what a person has once thrown away by their own deliberate, repeated fault. He may partly restore… We are, after all, only a poor recovered remnant in the mercy of God, with limited vision.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Writers differ in emphasis here. Some stress the loss; others stress that a fresh start is possible at all, and that the consequences run alongside the grace rather than cancelling it:

There is something particularly encouraging: we also see God's grace in the life of Samson, restoring him and enabling a fresh start to be made. Even if the consequences of his failure remain with him, we read that his hair began to grow again… Samson calls on God to help him, and God responds.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Why God Acts at All

The reason the story turns is not Samson's merit. There is another side to it:

As for Samson, his dependence grows. He gets his weakness, and so he gets his strength. Then there is God's side of it. The Philistines always make mistakes; Satan always overreaches himself. The Philistines are now going to give the credit to someone else. They are going to credit Dagon, their god. So now it is not a question between poor failing Samson and the Philistines, but a question between Dagon and God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Holding Recovery Humbly

The growth starts in a prison, so it gives no ground for boasting.

How we delight in any little sign of recovery. How the Lord Jesus delights in it too. Let us not overrate it, or take pride in it, or claim things as though we had achieved them. Instead, let us acknowledge any recovery as evidence of past failure and present inadequacy. Samson's final victory was not something anyone would boast about. Let us make recovery our aim, as people who know their own weakness. Let us not make it our claim, as though we had no idea of our true condition.

Modernised from Greg QuailOriginal wording

Summary

- Sign — The uncut hair was never magic; it was the mark of a life set apart, and strength followed obedience, not hair.

- Secret — Strength left when the secret left. Separation kept between the soul and God holds; separation put on show is already given away.

- Start — Growth begins in the prison, in humiliation, and it is there that a man who rarely prayed finally cried to God.

- Scars — The hair returns; the eyes do not. Recovery is real, but what a person threw away by choice may never come back in full.

- Stakes — The real contest is Dagon against God, not Samson against the Philistines. So recovery is something to aim at, never to boast in.

Judges 16:23 · Darby

Then the lords of the Philistines gathered together to sacrifice a great sacrifice to Dagon their god, and to rejoice; for they said, Our god has given Samson our enemy into our hands.

The Philistine lords throw a victory party, and they hand Dagon the credit for capturing Samson. That one boast turns a local defeat into a public claim about which god rules. It forces an answer the Philistines never expected.

Who Dagon Was

Dagon had temples in the main Philistine cities. He turns up more than once in Israel's history.

The national god of the Philistines, whose main temples were at Gaza and Ashdod. Some trace the name to dag, "fish"; others trace it to dagan, "corn," making him a god of farming. This was the idol that fell to pieces before the ark of Israel. Later the Philistines hung the head of Saul in its temple.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Contest Changes Hands

Samson had failed, and his enemies had reason to celebrate. But they did not stop at Samson. They named their god as the one who handed him over.

But as for Samson, his dependence grows. He gets his weakness, and so he gets his strength. Then as to God's side of it. Ah, the Philistines always make mistakes. Satan always overreaches himself. The Philistines are now going to give the credit to someone else. They are going to give it to Dagon their god. So now it is not a question between poor failing Samson and the Philistines. It is a question between Dagon and God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Must Answer for Himself

Israel had seen this pattern before, when the Philistines captured the ark of God.

The Philistines took God's ark from Israel. So long as it was a question between Israel and the Philistines, God lets His ark go. Israel had turned away from Him and were a sinful people; they had no right to the ark. But they carry the ark into the house of Dagon and set it before Dagon, as if admitting that Dagon rules. Then God must speak for Himself, as He always will, and Dagon falls. So when they hold a great celebration for Dagon and give him the credit for the victory over Samson, they are defying God. They are throwing in His face what they had done. Therefore God must speak. He does speak — and to great effect.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Who the Enemy Is Really Aiming At

Samson is the one in chains, blinded and mocked. Yet the insult reaches past him.

Samson is now only a poor blind slave, the sport of the enemies of Jehovah. Let us not be mistaken about this. The enemy was more hostile to God than to Samson. To all appearance, the defeated Nazirite now stood as proof that the false god Dagon had beaten the true God. The lack of reality in Christians is the world's most powerful weapon against Christ. In despising the unfaithful believer, the world is really seizing its chance to despise Him.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

(A Nazirite was someone set apart to God by a special vow.)

Mercy Hidden in the Ruin

The boast forces God to answer. That answer comes through the very man they are laughing at. His losses turn out to be gains.

The Philistines call it the triumph of their god that Samson has fallen into their hands. So Jehovah must show Himself. Samson too, though blinded, begins to see more clearly than when the lust of his eyes held him captive. His chains set him free; his darkness gives him light. It is the goodness of God that leaves His people to the consequences of their sins. He does it so that the bitter fruit may condemn the tree, and so that they may find fellowship with Him by experience, however painfully. How much better to learn by His word through faith!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Restored, but Not Rescued

God defends His name, and He does not abandon the man who has ruined himself. Still, Samson does not escape untouched.

God remembers His own glory, and His poor servant humbled under the chastening of his sin. The Philistines gather to enjoy their victory and glorify their false gods. But Jehovah had His eye on all this. In his humiliation, the thought of the Lord had more power over Samson's heart; his Nazirite separation was regaining strength. … A slave and blind for life, his condition gives him an opportunity that his strength had never won for him. But he is blind and enslaved, and he must himself perish in the judgment he brings on the wickedness of his enemies. He had identified himself with the world by listening to it, and he must share the judgment that falls on the world.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Credit misplaced. The Philistines hand Dagon the credit for a victory their idol never won. That boast, not Samson's failure, is what provokes God.

- Contest transferred. Once the credit goes to Dagon, the fight is no longer Samson against the Philistines. It is Dagon against God.

- God speaks. God lets His own people suffer for their sin. But He will not leave His name in an idol's temple — the ark had already proved that.

- The real target. An unfaithful believer becomes the world's weapon against Christ. The mockery aimed at Samson lands on God.

- Strength returned. Blinded, Samson sees. Chained, he is free. But he had tied himself to the world, so he goes down under the judgment that falls on it.

Judges 16:24 · Darby

And when the people saw him, they praised their god; for they said, Our god has given into our hands our enemy, and the destroyer of our country, even him who multiplied our slain.

In Dagon's temple the crowd is not just mocking a prisoner — they are worshipping. Their song gives their idol the credit for beating the man who wrecked their country, and that raises the real question: whose name gets the credit?

The Credit Given to Dagon

The moment the Philistines put their god's name on this victory, the dispute stopped being a local one. Commentators note that in doing so the enemy overplays his hand.

The Philistines always make mistakes. Satan always overreaches himself. They are now going to give the credit to someone else. They are going to give it to Dagon, their god. So now it is not a question between poor failing Samson and the Philistines. It is a question between Dagon and God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same pattern shows up with the ark of the covenant, the chest that stood for God's presence with Israel. The Philistines captured it and set it in front of Dagon.

While it was only a question between Israel and the Philistines, God let His ark go. Israel had turned away from Him and sinned, and they had no right to the ark. But the ark is carried into the house of Dagon and set before Dagon, as if Dagon were supreme. Then God must speak for Himself, as He always will, and Dagon falls. So when the Philistines hold a great feast for Dagon and give him the credit for the victory over Samson, they are defying God, pure and simple. They throw in His face what they have done. So God must speak. And He does speak — how powerfully!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What a Ruined Witness Preaches

A Nazarite was a person set apart to God by a vow, with uncut hair as the mark of it. Samson, blind and in chains, looked like proof that Dagon was the stronger god — and one writer turns that on God's people.

His enemies have blinded him. To them, at least, this proves that Dagon is stronger than God! Have not God's people done the same? Have they not fallen into the hands of the uncircumcised? Have they not lost their Nazarite separation by mixing with worldly people? And so, by accepting the evil, they testify without words that evil is greater than good, and that the world holding them captive is stronger than God.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

God Watching the Celebration

The feast goes on as if God had nothing to say about it. Yet He was remembering two things there, and neither one was Dagon.

The Philistines give their false god the credit for their success. God remembers His own glory, and His poor servant humbled under the discipline of his sin. The Philistines gather to enjoy their victory and glorify their false gods. But Jehovah had His eye on all this. In his humiliation, the thought of the Lord had more power over Samson's heart; his Nazarite strength was returning. Who would fear a blind and suffering prisoner? But who in this world knows the secret of Jehovah?… He had joined himself to the world by listening to it, and he must share the judgment that falls on the world.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Making Sport Today

Samson's lowest moment is that he becomes the entertainment. One writer sees the same thing happening today.

They gather in huge crowds to hold a feast to Dagon, and they want Samson to entertain them. How low that man Samson has sunk, to be the entertainment for the Philistines! … I see a gifted man, a man who can speak well, a man who knows the Scriptures. I see him — shall I say it? — playing up to a worldly spirit in the professing church… Many a man who looks like a real Samson is really a poor, blinded slave of the Philistines.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the Judgment Fitted

The judgment that followed fitted what the crowd was doing.

It was fitting that such an awesome judgment should fall on the Philistines just then. They were enjoying the humiliation of a man who had once been strong and had lost his strength. More than that, they were offering sacrifice to Dagon, their idol, and so insulting and challenging the God of heaven and earth. Their god had no power to deliver them from a catastrophic end under the judgment of the God of Israel.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Credit misplaced. Once Dagon got the credit, the fight was no longer the Philistines against a fallen man. It was Dagon against God.

- Credit demanded. Give an idol God's honour to His face, and God answers for Himself. He did it when the Philistines set the ark before Dagon, and Dagon fell.

- Credit lost. A believer tangled up with the world preaches without words. The message is that evil beats good, and that the captor beats God.

- Credit hijacked. A gifted speaker can end up amusing the very crowd his gifts were meant to resist. The man who looks like a Samson may be the blind slave.

- Credit restored. God remembered His own glory and His humbled servant. The feast that insulted Him ended with Dagon unable to save anyone in the building.

Judges 16:25 · Darby

And it came to pass when their hearts were merry, that they said, Call for Samson, that he may make us sport. And they called for Samson out of the prison-house, and he played before them; and they set him between the pillars.

Samson's last public appearance is a joke at a religious party — blind, shaved, and dragged out of prison to amuse the crowd. How did God's strong man become the world's entertainment, and what is God doing while the Philistines laugh?

The fall of a strong man

One writer measures how far Samson has fallen, then turns it on any gifted believer today:

They gather in great crowds to hold a feast to Dagon, and they want Samson to entertain them. Oh how low that man Samson has sunk, to be the entertainment of the Philistines! I see a gifted man, a man able to speak well, a man with a knowledge of Scripture, and I see him — shall I say it? — flattering a worldly spirit in the professing church. To me it looks like either grinding corn for the Philistines, or entertaining them. Many a man who looks a real Samson is in fact a poor, blinded slave of the Philistines.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where the strength went

He is there because he gave away a secret that belonged to God.

To hold and keep a secret proves you are close to a friend. But the secret of God, being trusted with His confidence, is the highest privilege of all. To betray it to a stranger, whoever he may be, is to despise the precious position His grace has given us; it is to lose it. What do the enemies of God have to do with the secret of God? That is how Samson gave himself up to his enemies. Every attempt against him was powerless as long as he kept his Nazirite separation. When he lost that separation, Samson still looked as strong and impressive as before. But the LORD was no longer with him. "I will go out as at other times and shake myself free." But he did not know that the LORD had left him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Blind, and seeing at last

His chains and his darkness do more than punish him:

Samson, now blinded, begins to see more clearly than when the lust of his eyes held him captive. His bonds set him free; his darkness gives him light. It is the goodness of God that leaves His people to the consequences of their sins. He does it so the bitter fruit may condemn the tree, and so they may find fellowship with Him through experience, however painful. How much better to learn by His word through faith!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Recovery is not the same as full restoration:

His hair began to grow again. He was learning all over again that there was no strength in himself. But he has lost something that will never come back. He has lost his eyesight, and he can never get it back. God never fully restores what a person has once thrown away by his own deliberate, repeated fault.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The mockery changes the contest

By giving the credit to their idol, the Philistines change who they are fighting:

The Philistines always make mistakes; Satan always overreaches himself. The Philistines are now going to give the credit to someone else. They are going to give it to Dagon their god. Now the question is no longer between poor failing Samson and the Philistines. It is between Dagon and God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The blind prisoner nobody fears

The helplessness they laugh at is what puts him in position, and it decides how he dies.

Who would be afraid of a blind, broken prisoner? But who in this world knows the secret of the LORD? He is a slave, robbed of his sight for ever. Yet his state gives him an opportunity his strength could never win before his unfaithfulness took that strength away. But he is blind and enslaved, and he must himself perish in the judgment he brings on the wickedness of his enemies. He had identified himself with the world by listening to it, and he must share the judgment that falls on the world.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A death that outweighs a life

God answers the mockery Himself:

What a God we have to deal with, as Samson had! How He magnified Himself in that hour of deep humiliation and agony. They put Samson on show before those uncircumcised haters of Israel, who wrongly hoped they were watching their idol triumph over the LORD. Samson found it easier to die for His name than to go on living like this in Philistia. But God kept great things for his death. What a picture of — and yet what a contrast to — the death of Him who carried His complete devotion to the will of God to the very end. He did not only do that will; He suffered it to the uttermost.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret — Samson's strength hung on a confidence kept with God. Once he handed it to an enemy, he looked the same but had no power.

- Sport — a gifted man who loses that separation ends up entertaining the world. The same danger meets anyone who uses real ability to please a worldly spirit.

- Sight — his eyes never came back. God does not fully restore what deliberate, repeated sin has thrown away.

- Seeing — yet the blind prisoner sees more clearly than he ever did with two good eyes. God lets consequences teach what His word could have taught first.

- Showdown — once the Philistines gave the credit to Dagon, the fight was no longer about Samson but about God. Their great celebration became the hour of their ruin.

Judges 16:26 · Darby

And Samson said to the lad that held him by the hand, Let loose of me, and suffer me to feel the pillars upon which the house stands, that I may lean upon them.

Samson stands in Dagon's temple as a blind prisoner, brought out to entertain the crowd that once feared him. He asks the boy leading him to let him feel the pillars that hold up the building, and that small request is not what it seems.

Led by a boy

The detail that measures Samson's fall is the hand he is holding. One writer traces the whole slide, from the loss of his hair to the loss of his freedom:

Samson lost his hair, and his power was gone. "He did not know that the LORD had left him." How far we may get from God without knowing it! His hair gone, his power gone, he was at once easy prey for his enemies, who put his eyes out. His disobedience left him a helpless creature, led by a boy.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Binding, blinding, grinding

His ruin came in stages, and not all of it was the enemy's doing:

Samson first loses his strength, and that is his own folly. Next the Philistines put out his eyes, because a religion of mere outward form cannot bear open eyes. He has lost his discernment, and this he never regains. What a humiliation! What an irreparable loss. One writer has called this three-stage ruin the "binding, blinding, grinding" bondage of sin.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Darkness that gave him sight

Losing his eyes did something for Samson that having them never did:

Samson also, blinded, begins to see more clearly than when the lust of his eyes held him captive. His bonds set him free; his darkness gives him light. God is good, and that goodness leaves His people to the consequences of their sins. The bitter fruit condemns the tree. Then, through that experience, however painful, they find fellowship with Him. How much better it is to learn by His word through faith!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why he wanted to feel the pillars

His guards put him right where he wanted to be, and his excuse is thinner than it sounds:

When they brought Samson out to their huge idol temple, they gloated over his humiliated condition (v. 25). But they placed him in just the position that he wanted, between two pillars that supported the temple. These pillars must have been close together... The boy was unsuspecting, though Samson would not need two pillars to lean on.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The end of himself

Commentators read his posture — feeling for the pillars, then bowing — as the act of a man at the end of his own resources:

God is going to intervene, and He does it through this very man whose weakness is now so obvious. He has been crushed; he has been brought to the end of himself... he says, in effect, I must get free of this bondage. But there is only one way, and that is by getting free of himself. Samson reaches the end of his bondage when he reaches the end of himself. He takes hold of those pillars. The Philistines have no Jachin or Boaz holding up their temple, as God's temple is upheld by the everlasting truth of their names: "He will establish" and "In Him is strength." Then, bowing himself, as if admitting his own utter folly, he tears down the whole wretched building. He is crushed under the load that crushes his enemies too.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Dagon against God

The Philistines have given their idol the credit for beating Samson:

The Philistines are going to give the credit to Dagon their god. So now it is not a question between poor failing Samson and the Philistines, but a question between Dagon and God... When they hold a great celebration for Dagon, and credit him with the victory over Samson, they are doing nothing but defying God. They throw in His face what they have done, and so God must speak. He does speak — and how effectively.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An end better than the beginning

The chapter does not close on the failure. Another writer notes how rare prayer was in this man's life, and how much weight his last one carries:

Samson got back his place as a man set apart to God in this state of bitter humiliation... Samson was not a man of prayer. Only twice in all his history do we hear him speaking to God. Here, while his enemies were celebrating their triumph, Samson cried to the LORD. For my own part, I value in a man of God an end brighter than the beginning... Yes, Samson's end was a splendid victory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Bound — the fall came in three stages: binding, blinding, grinding. His own folly cost him his strength, and his enemies took his eyes.

- Blind — with his eyes gone he began to see more clearly than when his eyes ruled him; his darkness gave him light.

- Leaning — feeling for the pillars looked like a tired man steadying himself. No one needs two pillars to lean on.

- Emptied — he got free of his bondage only when he got free of himself.

- Answered — the Philistines gave their idol the credit. The quarrel was no longer with Samson but with God, and God spoke.

Judges 16:27 · Darby

Now the house was full of men and women; and all the lords of the Philistines were there; and upon the roof there were about three thousand men and women, who looked on while Samson made sport.

The House Packed From Floor to Roof

Samson stands blind and chained between two pillars while a nation crowds in to watch him. The verse pauses to count the audience — and that count becomes the measure of the judgment about to fall.

The House Packed From Floor to Roof

One writer describes the scene:

The temple was full of people, including the lords of the Philistines. About 3,000 men and women were on the roof. It seems to have been a viewing deck, giving them a clear view of what was happening inside.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Lowest Point of a Strong Man

The rulers and the crowd had come for one reason: to watch him perform.

Brought as low as he could be, Samson becomes their entertainment as well as their slave. But God was about to magnify Himself and His own ways.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Contest Changes Hands

The crowd had not simply beaten a man. They gave the credit for their victory to Dagon, their god. That changed who the real opponent was.

The Philistines always make mistakes; Satan overreaches himself always. The Philistines are now going to give credit to someone else. They are going to give credit to Dagon their god. So now it is no longer a question between poor failing Samson and the Philistines. It is a question between Dagon and God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Three Thousand Spectators Could Not See

Every eye in the building was on Samson, yet nobody in the building understood what they were looking at. His helplessness was what gave him his opening.

The Philistines ascribe their success to their false god. God remembers His own glory, and His poor servant humbled under the chastisement of his sin... Who would fear a blind and afflicted prisoner? But who in this world knows the secret of the Lord? A slave, and blind for life, his condition gives him an opportunity. His strength had never been able to win it, before his unfaithfulness took it from him... He had identified himself with the world by listening to it, and he must share the judgment that falls on the world.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Ruin at the Peak of the Celebration

The timing is the point. One writer applies it to the world and to the assembly of God's people:

If the unfaithfulness of the assembly has given the world power over it, the world for its part has attacked the rights of God by corrupting the assembly. So the world brings judgment down on itself at the very moment of its greatest triumph. That judgment puts an end to the existence of the Nazarite, and to his misery as well. At the same time it destroys the whole glory of the world in one common ruin.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Nazirite was a man set apart to God by a vow. Samson does not walk away from this ruin; he dies in it.

Still Making Sport Today

One writer turns the scene on the reader. Gifts of speech and Bible knowledge can be spent pleasing the crowd.

How low has that man Samson sunk, to make sport for the Philistines! I see a gifted man, a man with abilities of eloquence, a man with a knowledge of Scripture, and I see him — shall I say? — flattering a worldly spirit in the professing church... Many a man who looks like a real Samson is really a poor, blinded slave of the Philistines.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The End of Himself

The way out of that room was not more strength. It was the collapse of self-confidence.

He has been crushed, he has been brought to the end of himself. And there, as he performs for the Philistines, he says, in effect: I must get clear of this bondage. But there is only one way, and that is by getting clear of himself. Samson gets to the end of his bondage when he gets to the end of himself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Commentators differ over what was in Samson's heart at that moment. One reads his prayer as still self-centred. "Even at the end of his life it was not God's glory that meant most to him, but revenge for personal harm" (Leslie M. Grant). Others see real faith there, and point to Hebrews:

Perhaps he was the person the writer, by the Spirit of God, had in mind when he wrote of those who "by faith ... were made strong out of weakness" (Hebrews 11:34). We read of the deep groaning prayer in which Samson called to the Lord to give him back his strength. He asked it so that he might fulfil his purpose at the end.

Modernised from J. S. BlackburnOriginal wording

Summary

- Watched. The house was full, and three thousand more lined the roof to stare at a broken man.

- Worshipped. The crowd gave Dagon the credit for the win. That turned a local victory into a challenge against God Himself.

- Written off. No one feared the blind prisoner. No one in that building knew the secret of the Lord.

- Wrecked. The world's judgment fell at the very peak of its celebration, burying its glory in one common ruin.

- Warned. A gifted believer can end up entertaining the crowd that holds him captive. Freedom starts when he comes to the end of himself.

Judges 16:28 · Darby

And Samson called to Jehovah, and said, Lord Jehovah, remember me, I pray thee, and strengthen me, I pray thee, only this once, O God, that I may take one vengeance upon the Philistines for my two eyes.

Samson's last recorded words are a prayer. A blind prisoner stands between two pillars while a crowd laughs at him. It is a real cry to God, and God answers it. Yet what he asks for raises a hard question: can God hear a prayer when the heart behind it is still wrong?

A prayer with a personal grievance in it

He asks for strength to pay the Philistines back for the loss of his sight. Commentators do not smooth this over.

He prayed to the Lord for special strength, so that he could take vengeance on the Philistines for his two eyes (v. 28). Even at the end of his life it was not God's glory that meant most to him, but revenge for personal harm. Yet he was a believer, as Hebrews 11:32 shows, and God answered his prayer by giving him superhuman strength.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same weakness shows even here, and yet the prayer does not go unheard.

I am far from doubting that God worked in the man He had made the champion of His people. I feel sure that in moral terms he saw more clearly without them than he ever had with them. He had far too often made a wretched use of them in the past. And even now, despite God's work in his soul, was there nothing weightier to lament over than the loss of those two eyes? Nothing deeper? It was Samson feeling for himself, yet not unpitied by the Lord; for there was One above Samson who heard.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Dagon against God

The Philistines had gathered to celebrate their win. Their own boasting turned the day against them.

Ah, the Philistines always make mistakes. Satan always overreaches himself. The Philistines are now going to give the credit to someone else. They are going to give the credit to Dagon their god. So now it is no longer a question between poor failing Samson and the Philistines. It is a question between Dagon and God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

"Strengthen me only this once"

His strength was never his own muscle. It hung on his vow of separation to God, marked by uncut hair.

Here was one separated to God, set apart for the Lord. So he was placed under a defined obedience: his hair was not to be cut. While the command was kept, his strength stayed with him. Uncut hair and all-conquering strength might seem to have little to do with each other. But God was in it. A God whom we obey and honour is a God of strength to us. It was God's strength, given to one who recognised Him so plainly. Keeping the gift hung on obedience.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Recovery, but not everything back

Something came back to him. Something did not.

As to Samson, his hair began to grow again. Ah, he had learnt. He was learning over again that there was no strength in himself. The badge of dependence, the badge of separation, is coming back — but he has lost something that will never come again. He has lost his eyesight, and he can never get it back. God never fully restores what a person has once thrown away by deliberate, repeated fault. He may restore in part.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Praying at last — and dying in the judgment he calls down

The ending, though, is not a defeat. One writer weighs a life by how it closes.

Samson was not a man of prayer. Only twice in all his history do we hear him addressing God. Here, while his enemies were celebrating their triumph, Samson cried to the LORD. For my part, in a man of God I value an end brighter than the beginning — though this is surely not the highest thing. Yes, Samson's end was a splendid victory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

But he cannot escape the ruin he brings down.

Who would fear a blind and afflicted prisoner? But who in this world knows the secret of the Lord? He is a slave, blind for the rest of his life. Yet his position gives him an opportunity that his strength had never been able to win, back before his unfaithfulness took that strength away. But he is blind and enslaved, and he must perish himself in the judgment he brings on the wickedness of his enemies. He had identified himself with the world by listening to it, and he must share the judgment that falls on the world.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A likeness that is mostly a contrast

Samson's death achieved more than his life. Commentators see here a picture that points beyond him — and a sharp contrast.

What a figure of — and contrast with — the death of Him who carried His complete devotedness to the will of God all the way to that final point. He did not merely do God's will; He suffered it to the very end. So by His death He righteously secured what no living obedience could have touched.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Weakness prays. Samson's request still carries his old self-interest — revenge "for my two eyes." Yet God did not throw out this flawed cry. One above Samson heard.

- Strength is a gift. He asks for strength because the power was never his own. It hung on his separation to God, and God gives it.

- Recovery is partial. The hair grows back, the eyesight never does. God may restore in part, but deliberate, repeated fault costs what He does not fully give back.

- God's glory decides it. The Philistines gave the credit to Dagon. So the contest was no longer Samson against his enemies. It was Dagon against God.

- Victory costs him. He kills more in dying than in living. But he had joined himself to the world, so he shares its judgment — unlike the One whose death secured what no living obedience could touch.

Judges 16:29 · Darby

And Samson took hold of the two middle pillars upon which the house stood (and he supported himself upon them), the one with his right hand and the other with his left.

Samson is blind and in chains. His captors have brought him out of prison to amuse a crowd in the temple of Dagon, the god of the Philistines. He reaches for the two pillars that hold the building up. This is his lowest moment, and it is where God acts. Two questions follow: where does strength come from, and why did this victory cost Samson everything?

Placed exactly where he wanted to be

The Philistines chose where to stand him. One commentator points out that they chose the one spot Samson wanted, and that the boy leading him suspected nothing.

When they brought Samson out to their huge idol temple, they gloated over his humiliated condition. But they placed him in just the position that he wanted, between two pillars that supported the temple. These pillars must have been close together. Samson asked a boy who was guiding him to let him feel the pillars so he could lean on them. The boy suspected nothing, though Samson would not need two pillars to lean on.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The real contest

The Philistines gave the credit for their victory to their own god. One writer says that changed who the real contest was between.

The Philistines always make mistakes. Satan always overreaches himself. The Philistines are now going to give the credit to someone else. They are going to give the credit to Dagon their god. So now it is not a question between poor failing Samson and the Philistines. It is a question between Dagon and God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Strength found at the end of himself

The same writer sets two buildings side by side. The Philistine house rests on pillars that can be pulled down. God's house rests on two pillars called Jachin and Boaz, and their names say what God does.

He has been crushed, he has been brought to the end of himself. There, as he performs feats of strength in front of the Philistines, he says in effect: I must get clear of this bondage. But there is only one way, and that is by getting clear of himself. Samson gets to the end of his bondage when he gets to the end of himself. He takes those pillars. The Philistines have no Jachin or Boaz at their temple to hold it up. God's temple is held up by the everlasting truth of "He will establish" and "In Him is strength."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Two pillars, held fast

Samson had very little left. One writer turns that into a charge for believers who also feel they have little left.

All Samson had was two pillars, and he held them fast and made use of them. What a responsibility we have. Some features of the church may be out of reach now, because of the ruin that has come into it. That does not mean we should give up. We must seek to keep what belongs to the whole church — but in simplicity, not claiming any greatness for ourselves, and recognising how feeble our effort is, as Samson did.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The cost of the victory

One writer weighs the manner of this death, and what it showed about Samson and about Israel.

Though the dying hour of Samson brought more honour to God than all his life, its manner was in itself a chastening. In this, too, we can see a picture of the condition Israel had come to, like what was seen in the life and person of Samson. For what can be more humiliating than that a man's death should matter more than his life? Things had come to this point, and it brought no glory to anyone involved. The best thing for Israel and Judah, the best thing for God's glory, and the best thing for Samson himself, was that he should die.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Comparison with Christ

Commentators differ over reading this scene as a picture of the cross. One holds back. He says the comparison "seems too partial, too much contradicted by other parts" of the story (F. W. Grant). Another draws the link, but as a contrast rather than a likeness.

Samson found it easier to die for His name than to live like that in Philistia. But God kept great things for his death. What a picture of the death of Christ — and yet what a contrast! He alone carried His complete devotion to the will of God right to that final point. He did not only do God's will; He suffered it to the very end. So, by His death, He righteously secured what no living obedience could have touched.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Bondage — his chains were the outward sign of an inner bondage. He got free of the Philistines only by getting free of himself.

- Pillars — two pillars were all he had left, and he held them fast. Weakness is no excuse for letting go of what remains.

- Dagon — the crowd had turned this into a contest between their idol and the God of Israel. God acted for His own name, not only for Samson's.

- Cost — the victory was real, but his death mattered more than his life, and that is a humiliation, not a trophy.

- Contrast — Samson died under the ruin of his own failure. Christ went to death in full obedience, and won what no living obedience could reach.

Judges 16:30 · Darby

And Samson said, Let me die with the Philistines! And he bowed himself with might; and the house fell on the lords, and on all the people that were therein. So the dead that he slew at his death were more than those whom he had slain in his life.

Samson's story ends in a Philistine temple. He is blind and mocked, standing between two pillars in a building packed with his enemies. His last act killed more enemies than his whole life had. Was that a triumph, a tragedy, or both?

The end of himself

Samson's last act came after he had lost everything. One writer ties that emptiness to what God then did through him:

God is going to intervene, and He does it through this very man whose weakness is now so obvious. He has been crushed, he has been brought to the end of himself... Samson gets to the end of his bondage when he gets to the end of himself. He takes hold of the two pillars of the Philistine house. Then he bows himself, as if admitting his own utter folly, and tears down the whole wretched building. He is crushed beneath the load which crushes his enemies too.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Dagon against God

The crowd had gathered to credit their god with Samson's capture. That celebration changed who the real opponents were.

The Philistines always make mistakes. Satan always overreaches himself. The Philistines are now going to give the credit to someone else. They are going to give it to Dagon their god. So now it is not a question between poor failing Samson and the Philistines. It is a question between Dagon and God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The collapse settled the case. Another writer sums up what Dagon could do for his worshippers:

They were offering sacrifice to Dagon, their idol, and so insulting and challenging the God of heaven and earth. Their god had no power to deliver them from a catastrophic end under the judgment of the God of Israel.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

More honour in his death than in his life

Commentators do not read this ending as pure glory. One holds two things together: Samson's death honoured God, and the way it came was itself a discipline.

Though the dying hour of Samson brought more honour to God than all his life, the way it happened was itself a discipline... For what can be more humiliating than that one's death should be more important than one's life? Things had reached a shameful point for everyone involved. The best thing for Israel and Judah, the best thing for God's glory and for Samson himself, was that he should die.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer reads the same ending more brightly, and compares it with how Solomon finished:

Samson was not a man of prayer. Only twice in all his history do we hear him speaking to God. Here, while his enemies were celebrating their triumph, Samson cried to the LORD... to end like that was far better than to finish as Solomon did, in idolatry, after a magnificent reign of wisdom and power. Yes, Samson's end was a splendid victory.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A dim picture of a greater death

One writer sees a picture of Christ here, and the sharp difference too:

Samson felt it easier to die for His name than to live like this in Philistia. But God reserved great things for his death. What a picture of Christ's death, and yet what a contrast with it. He alone carried His complete devotion to the will of God right to that final point. He did not only do God's will; He suffered it to the very end. So by His death He righteously secured what no living obedience could have touched.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The pattern carries into Christian experience:

In practice Christ's death overcame all foes of every kind... Samson died with the wicked. But in that last terrible struggle he glorified God, for "the dead whom he killed at his death were more than those whom he had killed during his life." This is a true summary of every soul that has learned the power of Christ's death. The one who conquers there overcomes every foe, even him who has the power of death. It teaches us that death alone can deliver the strongest man from the place of temptation and failure.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What is left, held fast

Samson finished with almost nothing — and used it. One writer turns that into encouragement for anyone left with little:

All Samson had was two pillars, and he held them fast and made use of them... At the very end he bowed himself with all his might. His power was small by comparison, but bowing himself put it to real use.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The result outlived him. The Philistines fall silent in the record afterwards:

That day destroyed so many of them at once, and no doubt many of their leading lords and chiefs among them. It would have a subduing effect on their spirits.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Emptied — Samson only gets free of his bondage when he gets to the end of himself. The load that crushes his enemies crushes him too.

- Prayed — Samson speaks to God only twice in his whole story, and the last time is here. Writers call his end a splendid victory; one also calls it a discipline.

- Challenged — the Philistines gave Dagon the credit. So the contest became their god against God, and their god could not save them.

- Foreshadowed — his death is a picture of Christ's death and its opposite. Christ secured by dying what no living obedience could reach.

- Multiplied — two pillars, held fast, were enough. He killed more at his death than in his life, and the Philistines stayed quiet for years.

Judges 16:31 · Darby

And his brethren came down, and all the house of his father, and took him, and brought him up, and buried him between Zoreah and Eshtaol in the sepulchre of Manoah his father. And he had judged Israel twenty years.

Samson's story ends with a funeral, not a battle cry: his family carry him home and bury him in his father's grave. The verse then repeats an earlier line — twenty years judging Israel — and that raises the chapter's real question: what did his life achieve?

Two halves of one life

One writer treats the twenty-year note as a dividing line in Samson's record.

The note about his judgeship in Israel, which lasted twenty years, divides the story of Samson's deeds into two parts. The first part gives the heroic acts that win him the place of recognised authority, which he keeps for a time. The second shows his fall and ruin through being unfaithful to his calling as a Nazarite, though in his death he is victorious once more.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What "judged Israel twenty years" covers

The phrase sounds national. The promise given before his birth spoke only of a beginning, and his area was one corner of the land.

The angel told his parents that he was to be a Nazarite (that is, a separated one) from his birth. Israel was in bondage to the Philistines, the internal enemies of God's people, and God had to raise up a Nazarite to work out their deliverance. The words "he judged Israel twenty years" no doubt mean the south-west parts of the land, near Philistine country. It was said of Samson before his birth: "He shall begin to deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philistines."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer weighs what those twenty years changed.

Samson's relatives were at least concerned not to leave his body in the rubble of the Philistine temple. The twenty years he had judged Israel did not relieve Israel of Philistine oppression, though he was a thorn in the side of the Philistines.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Honour and chastening together

This ending is a victory, but one writer reads a rebuke in it too.

Samson's dying hour brought more honour to God than all his life. Yet the way he died was itself a kind of chastening… For what can be more humiliating than that a man's death should matter more than his life? Things had come to this point — a shameful one for everyone involved. The best thing for Israel and Judah, the best thing for God's glory and for Samson himself, was that he should die.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Better to finish well than to start well

Another writer refuses to let the record close in defeat, and sets Samson's finish beside Solomon's.

Thank God, the history of the last of the judges does not close with this defeat. God will have the final victory in spite of the unfaithfulness of His witnesses… To end like Samson, whose life held so many contrasts… was far better than to end his career like Solomon, worshipping idols after a magnificent reign of wisdom and power. Yes, Samson's end was a splendid victory.

Modernised from Henri L. RossierOriginal wording

Partial recovery

God gave Samson something back, but not everything.

As to Samson, his hair began to grow again. He had learned. He was learning over again that there was no strength in himself. The mark of dependence, the mark of separation as a Nazarite, is coming back. But he has lost something that will never come back. He has lost his eyesight and can never get it back. God never fully restores what a person has once thrown away by his own deliberate, repeated fault. He may restore in part.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The final verdict on him

Scripture's last word on Samson is not in Judges at all.

Despite Samson's failures, God achieved the purpose for which He had raised him up: He subdued the Philistines. But it only came about through Samson's own death. Scripture names Samson among the cloud of witnesses who "obtained a good report through faith," but it does not record his acts there. Heb. 11:32.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Separation. He was a Nazarite — a man set apart to God — and the whole record turns on whether he kept that place or gave it up.

- Fall. The second half of his life is the story of being unfaithful to that calling, and it cost him his eyes.

- Recovery. The hair grew back, but the sight never did. God may restore in part; what a person throws away by repeated fault is not always given back.

- Victory. His death brought God more honour than all his living years. That is a real triumph, and a humbling verdict on the years before it.

- Verdict. The twenty years never lifted the Philistine yoke. Yet his name stands among those commended for faith — his acts unlisted, his faith counted.