Jude 1:1–25

Jude 1:1 · Darby

Jude, bondman of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to the called ones beloved in God [the] Father and preserved in Jesus Christ

The letter opens not with a claim to rank but with a description of the readers: called, loved, and kept. Before he warns anyone about corruption, Jude tells the people of God who they are and whose hands hold them.

The writer names himself a servant

Jude was, by family, a brother of the Lord Jesus, yet he lets that go unmentioned. One writer explains why that silence is beautiful. He points to James, who wrote the same way:

It is true James does not call himself "the Lord's brother," but "the Lord's servant"; and this is very beautiful. If there had been any self-seeking, he would have been the one to say, "I am the Lord's brother! You must not forget I am the Lord's brother." But that would not have been from the Spirit of God at all. When he was the Lord's brother, he was an unbeliever... He had received the truth of Christ's Person not as son of Mary but as the Son of God, as the Messiah, the Lord of all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same restraint warns anyone who trades on family name or background:

He is content with two titles — "servant" (bondman) "of Jesus Christ, and brother of James."... then Jude too was a brother of the Lord by natural birth. If so, what grace and humility he shows in not calling attention to it! And what a lesson for all who take, or try to take, a place among believers on the ground of human distinction or birth!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Saints by calling, not by ambition

The word "called" is not a description of what these readers were aiming at. It describes what God did to them:

Jude reminds his readers that if they were saints, they were saints through grace, by a divine and sovereign call. That call came to them in the power of the Holy Spirit through the word of God. It reached their hearts and consciences, and separated them from the world, to be God's people. We cannot recall too often that it was God's call that made us saints. So we are not called to be saints; we are saints by God's calling.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Beloved in God the Father

Older translations read "sanctified" here. Commentators say "beloved" is the better-supported reading, and it ties the reader to two Persons at once:

He does not write to the saints of one particular assembly, nor to Jewish believers as distinct from Gentile ones. All saints are before him. He views them in two ways: first in relation to God the Father, and then in relation to Jesus Christ. The word "beloved" seems to be better supported than "sanctified."

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

To be loved in God the Father is more than being loved from a distance. It places the believer inside a relationship:

So Jude sets the saints in the immediate presence of God. He teaches them that they are the objects of His heart. He wants them to know that God has brought them, as such, to enjoy a close relationship with Him; for He is their Father, as well as God.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Kept — by Christ or for Christ

The ESV reads "kept for Jesus Christ"; older translations read "preserved in Jesus Christ." Commentators differ over the force of that phrase, and one says he cannot settle it:

It is not exactly "preserved in." It may be "by" or "for." These are the two options for that word. I do not see how it can be "in"... It brings in another idea, and it is true either way. We are preserved by Christ, and we are preserved for Christ.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Either way, the safety does not rest on the believer's grip. Nor does the strength of the surrounding evil change it:

This is especially comforting. No matter how dark the days may be, and however strong the current of evil, those who are "the beloved of God called saints" will be preserved in Jesus Christ. They are kept for Him as members of His body, till He comes. He keeps His own... It is the blessed assurance that the believer's keeping rests in His own hands.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

An address for a day of collapse

Jude's greeting answers the letter's grim subject in advance: people abandoning the faith. It also echoes a prayer of Jesus:

Jude begins by declaring the faithfulness of God and the character of His care for the saints. This answers to the prayer of Jesus in John 17. They were called ones, sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ. What a happy testimony! It magnifies the grace of God. "Holy Father," our Lord said, "keep them": and these were sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ. The apostle writes in view of many abandoning the holy faith; he addresses those who are kept.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Notice, too, that no city or congregation is named. That omission fits the letter's theme:

This epistle of Jude, which in an especial manner treats of the ruin, as well as that of John, which puts the faithful on their guard against the antichrists, by no means address themselves to a church, but to all who compose the church in general, to the faithful as having a common interest, a common destiny.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Servant first — Jude could have claimed family ties to Jesus, but never does. He takes the place of a servant, and that rebukes any standing claimed by birth or human distinction.

- Called by God — believers are not aiming to become saints. God's call made them saints and separated them from the world.

- Beloved in the Father — the better-supported reading puts the saints in God's immediate presence. They are the objects of His heart, and He is their Father.

- Kept in Christ — commentators differ over whether it means preserved by Christ or for Christ. Both are true, and either way the keeping rests in His hands, not ours.

- Kept for the ruin ahead — the greeting answers the Lord's own prayer, "keep them." Jude writes to all saints, not to one assembly, because many would abandon the faith.

Jude 1:2 · Darby

Mercy to you, and peace, and love be multiplied.

Jude writes to believers who are in real danger, and his greeting is unlike any other in the New Testament. Why does he begin with mercy, and why ask for it to be multiplied?

A greeting found nowhere else

Letters to churches normally open with grace and peace. Jude opens another way:

Then in verse 2 we have, "May mercy, peace, and love be multiplied to you." This is the only place where mercy is wished to believers as a whole. When the apostle writes to individual people, to Timothy and Titus for instance, he says "Mercy." But when he writes to believers as a whole, he says "Grace and peace."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why mercy comes first

One writer asks why mercy appears here at all:

Why does Jude bring "mercy" in here? Because they badly needed the comfort. A person should always feel the deep need of mercy. That is true above all when danger is near, and true again when he feels his own unworthiness. So Jude now gives that comfort to all these believers, because their danger is close at hand.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer explains why Jude does not open with grace, as letters to churches do:

He wishes them mercy first, not grace, as he does when writing to churches. Here the believers are not viewed as "in Christ," but as people in circumstances of serious need. Peace and love come with it, to make a threefold provision for meeting the adversity. And since God is the source, these things can be multiplied.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What the peace and the love are

The peace asked for here is not the question of a person's standing before God being settled. It is something carried into the middle of danger, and love is named as the element the believer lives in:

Mercy is the first thing (see v. 21), for in the circumstances they were in this was their first need: mercy for their weakness. It is the constant outflow of God's tender compassion to protect them, to sustain them, and to guard them among the dangers of their path. Also peace — not peace with God, but peace itself, absolute peace, which fills the whole soul. In its power we can walk calmly in the face of the greatest dangers and the most vicious enemies. Love is added — the expression of the divine nature, that holy circle and atmosphere into which God brings the redeemed, and in which they live and move and have their being. And Jude desires all these to be multiplied to them. Note the order: mercy, then peace as the fruit of mercy, then love as the sphere of the soul's life.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The force of "multiplied"

One writer works out the difference with plain arithmetic:

Multiplication increases numbers far more than addition does. If you add 10 and 10 together you make 20, but if you multiply them you make 100. So God promised to Abraham: "I will surely bless you, and I will surely multiply your offspring as the stars of heaven and as the sand that is on the seashore" (Genesis 22:17). Our God and Father always delights to make His blessings abound toward His own. And we are so needy that we need them all.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Another writer applies this to the days Jude describes:

What is more, believers can still enjoy the blessings of "mercy," "peace," and "love," however dark the day. And not only enjoy them, but see them "multiplied." If evil abounds and difficulties multiply, then mercy and peace and love will also be multiplied.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Mercy and personal dependence

Mercy comes up again near the end of the letter. One writer links the two:

Only in Jude do we have "May mercy, peace, and love be multiplied to you." Then in verse 21 we read, "waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life." Here Jude has in view the drift of Christendom away from God, at a time when things were moving fast toward judgment. So we find believers urged to keep themselves "in the love of God." This is again a question of their state, and it shows that when the Christian profession had slipped, and was still slipping, personal dependence becomes urgent.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Mercy — the signal. Nowhere else does a letter wish mercy to believers as a group rather than to individuals like Timothy and Titus. It marks them out as people in danger.

- Mercy — the supply. It comes first because it meets weakness and unworthiness. Peace follows as its fruit, and love is the air the soul then lives in.

- Mercy — the multiplier. Not added but multiplied. God delights to make His blessings abound, and they rise as the difficulties rise.

- Mercy — the source. God Himself is the source, so the three are supplies for hard times, not a polite opening line.

- Mercy — the response. When the Christian profession slips, mercy calls for more dependence on God, not less.

Jude 1:3 · Darby

Beloved, using all diligence to write to you of our common salvation, I have been obliged to write to you exhorting [you] to contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints.

Jude sat down to write one letter and ended up writing another. He meant to write about the salvation Christians share, but sent instead an urgent call to defend a faith already given and now under attack.

Why the letter changed course

One writer calls this change of plan unique, and shows why the dropped subject was not needed:

Jude had planned to write a treatise about "the common salvation." But he found himself turned aside from that plan. Instead he wrote this short letter, urging the defence of the faith. This is a remarkable admission and quite unique. The "common salvation" — that is, the salvation we all share — is indeed an endless theme... In fact an inspired explanation of that salvation was already available in Paul's letter to the Romans. And in the inspired Word God does not repeat Himself.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The redirection itself teaches something about how Scripture came to us:

Here is a very fine illustration at the close of the New Testament of how the Word of God was given. Jude had a desire to write about the common salvation. But the Holy Spirit wanted him to write about something else and made him do so — not in his own words but in words given by God.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What "the faith" means

Jude's word "faith" needs care here:

"The faith" Jude speaks of is not the personal faith by which we believe, but that which is to be believed — the truth. When error spreads and opposition raises its head, explaining the truth is not enough. We must contend for it. This means conflict. But when Christ is attacked and the truth is at stake, we must not shrink from fighting the good fight of faith on any plea of Christian love.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

And Jude means the faith — the whole of it, not one favourite doctrine:

We are not simply to contend for a particular truth. This has indeed been done. The result is that the truth as a whole has been lost. Sects have formed to hold on to one truth, such as holiness, the presence of the Spirit, the unity of the church, or the coming of the Lord.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The force of "once"

The small word "once" carries the weight of the verse (older versions read simply "once delivered"):

"Once" is an ambiguous word. It might mean "once upon a time," once at a particular moment; but that is not the force of the word here at all. It means "once for all." And what a blessing it is that in this book... we have the holy deposit we are called to believe, given to us in full, "once for all." Every truth we are to receive is revealed in the word of God. Every difficulty and every departure from the truth is guarded against there in one way or another.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That closes the door on later additions, however respectable their source:

The faith allows no addition, no change and no development... We may have much to learn about the truth. God may grant fresh light on truth already revealed, and we should grow in our grasp of it. But the truth itself has been delivered to the saints once for all. And it is for this that we are to contend. Not the truth held in part by the early Fathers, handed down by tradition, hardened into creeds or blurred by faulty teaching. It is the faith once delivered to the saints, in the very form it was delivered.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Contend for, not merely against

The word Jude uses is strong. Older translations read "contend earnestly," and one writer renders it "to earnestly agonize for the faith" (F. B. Hole). But the direction of that effort matters:

There are times, indeed, when contending for the truth means exposing evil. But the great business of God's people is with the truth, not the error. Jude does not say earnestly expose the error, but "earnestly contend for the faith."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Every believer's task

Jude addresses ordinary believers, not a qualified few:

Only the Apostles were given the authority to explain the faith and commit it to the inspired Writings. Only a few were given to be pastors and teachers... How likely, then, that most believers would jump to the conclusion that defending the faith was also the business of a few. That is why this call was needed.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Sword in one hand, trowel in the other

One writer compares us to the men who rebuilt Jerusalem's wall under Nehemiah, working with a weapon at hand:

He would have us, in a word, like Nehemiah's builders, with the sword in one hand and the trowel in the other... Notice that the sword is more for defence than for attack. But we must not avoid conflict when the faith once delivered to the saints is at stake.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Diverted. Jude meant to write about the salvation all believers share. The Spirit turned his pen to a warning instead. That turn shows how God's Word was given.

- Deposited. "The faith" is not your believing but the thing believed: the truth, handed over as a whole, not in pieces.

- Final. "Once" means once for all — no additions, no development, no tradition or creed allowed to reshape it.

- Defended. Aim at the truth, not at error. Jude's word means to agonize for it.

- Everyone's. The call came to ordinary believers, not only to apostles and teachers. Every believer builds with one hand and holds the sword with the other.

Jude 1:4 · Darby

For certain men have got in unnoticed, they who of old were marked out beforehand to this sentence, ungodly [persons], turning the grace of our God into dissoluteness, and denying our only Master and Lord Jesus Christ.

Jude has just urged his readers to fight for the faith. Here is the reason: the danger was already inside the door. These men slipped in unnoticed, and the verse names two marks of them. They twist grace into an excuse for sin, and they deny the Master they claim to serve.

Men who crept in, not men who walked out

The word "unnoticed" carries the whole force of the warning. These men looked respectable enough to be welcomed in. In John's letter the bad people went out; here they stayed:

"For certain people have crept in unnoticed." Jude writes at a slightly earlier point in time than John. When John wrote his First Letter, the bad people went out — the antichrists went out (1 John 2:19). But the danger here was that they were inside. Certain men had crept in unnoticed. That is, at first they looked respectable, of course. "Who long ago were designated for this condemnation" — "condemnation" is not exactly what the word means; it is "to this judgment."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Designated long ago — and admitted through carelessness

Two things stand side by side here. God had already seen these men, and those guarding the door failed to spot them. The same writer explains what "ungodly" means:

First, they had crept into the assembly "unnoticed." That is, no one saw what they really were when the assembly received them. In a day of evil there is no more serious responsibility than that of the gatekeepers (see 2 Chronicles 23:19), whose duty is to admit only those with a clear right to enter… The gatekeepers had failed. Yet these men had been "marked out beforehand to this sentence." The all-seeing eye of the Spirit of God had seen them already, and the ground of their condemnation had been settled and announced in advance. In their essential character they were "ungodly" men. They had no fear of God before their eyes. They acted with no reference to Him, shutting God out of their thoughts, acts, and ways.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Grace twisted into sensuality

The first mark is a twist. God's grace saves people and teaches them to say no to worldly desires. These men used it as cover for indulging themselves:

First they turned the grace of God into sensuality. In the letter to Titus we learn that grace is the principle on which God is saving men. By it He teaches the believer to say no to ungodliness and worldly desires and to live self-controlled, upright and godly lives in this present age (Titus 2:11-12). These ungodly men took the great principle by which God saves men from sin and teaches them self-control, and used it as their chance to gratify the flesh and indulge their lust — while keeping up a respectable Christian profession and moving in the Christian circle.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Some people say grace is too dangerous a teaching to preach openly. The answer here runs the other way:

We sometimes hear people today objecting to the doctrines of grace on the ground that they may be abused. The answer is that they have been abused, and the abuse was in full swing before the first century ended. Scripture tells us how they were abused. Yet instead of advising us to drop the doctrines of grace, it urges us to contend for them!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Denying "our only Master"

The word behind "Master" is not the usual word for "Lord." It speaks of ownership, not of nearness:

Note that the word used here for "Lord" is not the usual one. The same term occurs in Luke 2:29, Acts 4:24, Jude 4. It means the Lord as "sovereign master." It is also used in 2 Peter 2:1: "even denying the Master who bought them." Here we do not have the nearness in which we know Him as "our Lord." We have the general relation of authority, in which the Lord is Master of the whole world — of all men, bad or good.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

They did not deny Him in words. They refused His will, and that refusal is lawlessness at its root:

They seized on grace as an excuse for sin, continuing in sin so that grace might abound (Romans 6:1). And they rejected the authority of Christ, who was in fact their only Master… In a word, they refused the will of Christ, so that they might be free to do their own will… This is the essence of all lawlessness. It was therefore a true falling away from the faith, even though they still stood outwardly on Christian ground… These ungodly men existed in Jude's day. But do not forget that they have their counterparts in every age of the church, and so in our own time.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The judgment already named

Jude does not leave the "condemnation" vague. Later in the letter he says who carries it out:

Verse 4 shows the character that suits the enemy to take at a particular time. Those who had "crept in unnoticed" are the ones on whom the Lord will carry out judgment when He comes. Enoch prophesied about them (v. 14, 15). The Lord will judge the same set of people who were coming in during the apostle's days.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Entry. The danger walked in quietly and looked respectable. The antichrists went out; these men stayed inside.

- Character. "Ungodly" means living with no reference to God, while still passing as a Christian.

- Grace. They took the very thing that teaches us to say no to worldly lusts and used it as permission to indulge them.

- Authority. Denying "our only Master" means refusing His will so they can do their own — the essence of lawlessness.

- End. God marked them out long ago, and the Lord will judge them when He comes. Meanwhile the answer to abused grace is not to drop it but to contend for it.

Jude 1:5 · Darby

But I would put you in remembrance, you who once knew all things, that the Lord, having saved a people out of [the] land of Egypt, in the second place destroyed those who had not believed.

Jude has just described people who slipped in among Christians and turned God's grace into an excuse for sin. Then he reaches back to Israel's rescue from Egypt. God saved that people, and later destroyed them. Jude asks his readers to remember what they already know.

A Reminder, Not New Teaching

Jude says he is stirring up memory rather than supplying information. One writer explains why Jude repeats such a familiar fact, and which state of soul he targets.

That fact is a very solemn thing for the writer to bring before them. It was meant to make them serious, and to deliver them from that careless state of soul which takes it for granted that no harm can happen, because we have all been so blessed and led into the truth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "Saved" Means Here

The word "saved" here needs care. Saved from what, and saved for how long? One writer marks the limits.

"The Lord, having saved a people" — mark that — "out of the land of Egypt" — that is the sovereign grace that shows the salvation. I am not speaking of it now as eternal salvation. It was sovereign grace that chose Israel. They were not chosen for everlasting glory, but only delivered out of Egypt… In one sense they came into the narrower circle of what were God's people, and in one sense they were also saved. But they gave up the grace; they abandoned God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Afterward" — A Second Act of God

Some read the word translated "afterward" as "the second time." That points to a second act of God toward the same people. One phrase then holds forty years of judgment.

The first act was that He "saved" them, He brought them out by means of the Passover lamb, which was His first great act of "saving"… What was "the second time"? When He "destroyed" them. It is not vague; it says "the second time," and that is the great point. When Israel set up the golden calf, "the second time" began. God went on striking and striking until everyone was destroyed except Caleb and Joshua.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Unbelief Is the Charge

Jude does not blame immorality for their end. He names unbelief. One writer marks who this warning pictures, and who it does not.

The things that happened to them are not pictures of true believers. They are pictures of those who profess faith in Christ, and most of these today have no faith in His sacred Word. This is the sense of the warnings of Scripture — "afterward destroyed those who did not believe"; "they were unable to enter because of unbelief" (Hebrews 3:18-19). The unbelief shows itself in unholy and unrighteous behaviour. Those things have to be dealt with, but the root evil is unbelief. The mere profession of faith in Christ saves no one.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Where This Example Leads

Jude is not only describing an evil. He is showing where it ends.

Jude not only portrays the character of the evil, but he also shows what it involves and where it leads. It involves the hopeless state of people who abandon the faith, and it leads to overwhelming judgment. To prove this, Jude recalls three terrible examples from history. The first is Israel, saved out of Egypt but later destroyed in the wilderness. What was the secret of their downfall? Lust and lawlessness. They lusted after the things of Egypt, and they rebelled against God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Moral Order of the Three

One writer explains why Israel's case belongs here, and why the three examples come in this order.

The case of Israel shows that the judgment will proceed on the ground of their having occupied the place of the people of God… The Israelites destroyed in the wilderness did not believe; they were children with no faith. Only two of those who came out of Egypt were spared — Caleb and Joshua… The sin of the angels who did not keep their first position was rather that of disobedience… In the case of Sodom and Gomorrah it was the will of the flesh, self-will in lust. And note the moral order: first unbelief, then disobedience, and finally the flesh given free rein — an order shown again and again in the word of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Personal Question

The verse leaves the reader with something to settle, not just something to observe.

Though Israel was brought out of Egypt, this was no proof that all were believers. Later on, because of unbelief, many were destroyed. A mere outward connection with God's testimony gives no security. They had seen God's power and grace, yet they were destroyed… Let each one make sure he is truly born again, and not in such a condition.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Remember — Jude adds no new teaching. He wakes up truth they already knew, to break the idea that past blessing rules out danger.

- Rescued — the salvation here is rescue out of Egypt by the Passover lamb. It was sovereign grace to a whole people, not a promise of everlasting glory.

- Rejected — the charge against them was unbelief. Bad behaviour was the symptom, unbelief the root. Profession alone saved no one.

- Repeated — all three examples show the same slide: first unbelief, then disobedience, then the flesh let loose.

- Reckoned — an outward link to God's testimony gives no security. Each reader must settle the question of new birth himself.

Jude 1:6 · Darby

And angels who had not kept their own original state, but had abandoned their own dwelling, he keeps in eternal chains under gloomy darkness, to [the] judgment of [the] great day;

Jude is warning believers about ungodly men among them. He backs the warning with three examples from the past. The second example goes beyond the human race. God gave these angels a place, they walked out of it, and He has held them ever since, waiting for judgment.

Second Of Three Warnings

The verse sits between two other examples: Israel, and the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Each one makes the same point from a different angle.

In verses 5-7, we have three cases. They show that God's judgment cannot be reversed, and that it rests on the kind of evil these ungodly men were committing. With Israel the evil was plain, complete unbelief. The unbelievers were destroyed, even though at the start they shared in many privileges. In the case of the angels, their sin was in one word, apostasy. They totally abandoned their original place and state. That is apostasy: and for any creature to do that, whether angel or man, is to be doomed beyond hope. Sodom and the cities around her gave themselves up to unrestrained vice. They broke through boundaries that God had set, and their judgment is eternal. Three terrible warnings!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Place They Left

"Their own position of authority" and "their proper dwelling" describe something given, not taken. Their sin was not a lack of standing. It was refusing to stay where God put them.

Fallen angels are another example of those who enjoyed a position of favour and yet left their original place. There is no suggestion that these had eternal life, but they had a position of dignity from which they fell, leaving their own dwelling — that is, the place in which God had put them, which is of course rebellion. In this case there is no possible salvation for them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Not The Spirits At Large Today

These chained angels are not the evil powers at work in the world now. One writer connects them instead with the "sons of God" of Genesis 6, and points to the contrast with Satan, who is still free.

But angels other than the devil also fell. Of some, Scripture says they are kept "in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment of the great day." But Satan roams all over the world now, and others with him, so they are not in chains under darkness... "The sons of God," in Genesis 6:2, were angels, just as in Job, "the sons of God" presented themselves before God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how far this reaches. Some take it of one group of angels only. Others think it may describe the state of all fallen angels, and admit the point is hard to settle.

Chains, Darkness, And The Day

The word rendered "eternal" is one of two words Scripture uses. One writer explains why the chains take this one and not the other. Older translations render it "everlasting."

The "everlasting chains," in which He has kept and still keeps the apostate angels under gloomy darkness, point to the judicial action of His power. They do not point to His nature or to His gracious purposes, which suit and call for the other word.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

As for when "the great day" arrives, writers are careful not to say more than the text does.

Scripture says nothing about angels being judged at the Great White Throne, so we must be content with Jude's general statement: they will be judged at the great day. The apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 6 tells us that we will judge angels together with Christ.

Modernised from H. B. CoderOriginal wording

The Road Apostasy Travels

Taken with the other two examples, the verse traces a sequence in four steps.

First, the underlying evil in every case was lust in some form. Second, the effort to satisfy that lust led to rebellion against the authority of God. Third, rebellion against God meant abandoning the position in which God had placed them. This is apostasy. Fourth, in every case apostasy brought overwhelming judgment. There is no hope for the apostate.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The examples are ancient. The danger they point to is present.

How solemn the warnings of these terrible examples are! How plainly they announce that the corruption and rebellion which marks the great mass of people claiming the Christian name today is leading to the hopeless horror of apostasy — the total abandonment of the Christian position. For apostasy there is neither recovery nor remedy.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Kept, given. God gave these angels a position of dignity and a home. The place was a gift, not something they earned.

- Kept not. They left it. Lust led to rebellion. Rebellion led them out of the place God had set, and that is what the writers call apostasy.

- Kept now. The chains and gloom show God's power acting in judgment. These are not the spirits roaming free today, but angels already confined.

- Kept until. Their case waits for "the judgment of the great day." Scripture says no more, and the writers refuse to add to it.

- Keep watch. Corruption and rebellion mark the Christian name today, and they lead the same way. For apostasy there is no recovery and no remedy.

Jude 1:7 · Darby

as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities around them, committing greedily fornication, in like manner with them, and going after other flesh, lie there as an example, undergoing the judgment of eternal fire.

Jude points to Sodom and Gomorrah as his third and final warning from history, and he says those ruined cities are still on display. Two hard questions follow: what was their sin, and how can a fire that fell so long ago be called "eternal"?

Third in a chain of three

Jude has just named Israel in the wilderness and the angels who left their place. One writer reads all three as the same pattern.

Israel fell to lusting, rebelled against God, and so abandoned the place of outward relationship with God that He had given them. This was apostasy and led to their judgment — they were destroyed. The angels lusted and abandoned the angelic position in which God had set them. This, too, was apostasy, and as a result they are abandoned to judgment. Sodom and Gomorrah lusted and abandoned the natural order which God had ordained. This again was apostasy, exposing them to the judgment of "eternal fire."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The sin that broke through a boundary

Jude does not just say these cities sinned. He shows how far past ordinary sin they went.

Here it is clear that this was a breaking out, not just into sin, but into something outrageous beyond measure. It was not only evil. It went against even fallen nature. That is what is in view here. The Holy Spirit describes the very same people in a different way, to suit His purpose.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Left lying as a public exhibit

The verse says these cities "serve as an example." Their ruin is still there for anyone to see.

Those cities still lie under the weight of their doom, swallowed up in the judgment that overtook them. The Spirit of God points to this as both a warning and an example. It warns that judgment is certain to come. It shows that this judgment is eternal. Let all such as these corrupters of God's grace and rebels against the authority of Christ beware!

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

What "eternal fire" points to

Some say the phrase means only that the cities burned up and lie in ruins to this day.

It is not very hard to see that Jude, in speaking of these "cities," speaks of the people in them. The people had sinned, and the judgment fell on the people. The fire and brimstone from heaven was the type or pattern of that "eternal fire" in which they suffer still. The temporary fire that destroyed them from the earth was not the eternal one, and Scripture does not say it was. But the wrath of God shown against them is a sample, a specimen, of what could not be temporary: that wrath against sin which is the "eternal fire." The fire that destroyed them was "eternal fire" if you look, not at the material fire, which was both its instrument and its symbol, but at the divine wrath shown in it.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The same word "eternal" describes other things in Scripture. Weaken it here and you weaken it there too.

If destruction in 2 Thessalonians 1:9 is not really "everlasting," then salvation in Hebrews 5:9 is not either. And if the fire in Jude 7 is not "eternal," then neither is the glory in 2 Timothy 2:10.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The slide, and where it ends

One writer reads Jude's three examples as steps in a single slide downward.

All apostasy starts with unbelief in what God has spoken… They gave up the place assigned to them. This is the next step in the progress of apostasy. Unbelief leads to rebellion against God. Sodom and Gomorrah come next. Here we find the grossest immoralities, and the pursuit of unnatural desire. These vicious things are still in the world, and why are they so prominent in our days? Because of unbelief… So apostasy develops like this: unbelief, then rebellion against God and His revealed truth, then immorality, then anarchy. We can trace these steps in our own times.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why Lot had to get out first

One writer weighs what an angel said to Lot before the fire fell.

The angel said, "I can do nothing till you arrive there." Why could he not? Not because God lacked power to judge, but because it is a fixed principle of God's ways that punishing, eternal wrath must never touch His people. The judgment of these cities was not only a matter of God's government. Punishing wrath was involved too, as we see in Jude 7. The "punishment of eternal fire" could never touch Lot, since he was a righteous man, though a misguided one.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Lust — all three of Jude's examples start with desire. Desire grows into rebellion against God.

- Leaving — each group walked out of the place God gave them. Sodom walked out of the natural order He had set. That is apostasy.

- Limit — their sin broke through a boundary. It went beyond even what fallen nature does.

- Lasting — the fire from heaven was only the pattern. Strip "eternal" of its weight here, and you strip it from salvation and glory too.

- Lot — judgment could not fall while one righteous man was still inside. The verse that warns the ungodly also reassures the believer.

Jude 1:8 · Darby

Yet in like manner these dreamers also defile [the] flesh, and despise lordship, and speak railingly against dignities.

Jude has just set three ruined examples in front of his readers — Israel in the wilderness, the angels who left their place, and Sodom and Gomorrah. Now he turns to the men who had slipped in among the saints, and the same marks are on them: defiled flesh, contempt for authority, and a loose tongue.

The Link Back to Verses 5-7

The "yet in like manner" is not a change of subject. It ties the men described in verse 4 to the judgments just recited. The writers below use an older wording: "despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities" where the ESV reads "reject authority, and blaspheme the glorious ones."

He now returns and points out that these men followed similar courses. They did so despite these public and well-known examples of the certainty of God's judgment against evil.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Dreamers

The word "filthy" in the older wording was added by the translators. The charge here is subtler than open indecency.

What he says is, "Likewise also these dreamers." I do not know any reason for putting in the word "filthy." You will see the word is in italics. There is a great deal of wickedness where there is nothing wrong in the words used. It is only in the idea. Nothing may sound offensive, yet it undermines all that is precious in people who live in the imagination of their own hearts instead of letting the word of God guide them. Why? Because the word of God is an expression of God's authority, and His will is the only thing that ought to guide us, as well as all mankind.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer reads the dreaming as a preference for private revelation over what God has already said.

Their dreaming may be taken as an indication that they had forsaken reality for unreality. How many a false teacher would rather regard his dreams as directive and revelatory than God's sound and inerrant Word.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Defiling the Flesh

The first mark is corruption of the body, and it keeps strange company with religion.

They "defile the flesh" — a phrase that means moral and bodily corruption. It is remarkable that everywhere in Scripture a high religious profession with nothing real behind it is always joined to abominable sins.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Despising Dominion

The second mark is not a quarrel with one particular ruler. It is a temper of soul.

This is self-will in man fully grown. He asserts himself and his rights, and at the same time refuses to acknowledge any authority above him. The text does not say which dominion or "lordship" is meant. What it condemns is the spirit of these dreamers — a spirit that will not submit to anything. It is the spirit of insubordination, the growing spirit of the world today.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The seed of it, one writer says, is not only in false teachers.

Refusing to submit to lawful authority — that was the principle at work. Verse 8 describes it again as lordship despised. And, oh, beloved, are not the seeds of it found in each heart? It first shows itself when a small child disobeys his parents. It shows itself still in the desperate waywardness, self-will and rebellion of our hearts, even though we are the Lord's children.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

Speaking Evil of Dignities

The third mark grows out of the second. Contempt inside becomes railing outside.

Last comes the fruit of despising dominion: speaking evil of dignities, railing against them. It is the tongue fully let loose. These people have no reverence for God or man, and they disown all allegiance. They say, in the words of the Psalmist, "With our tongue we will prevail, our lips are with us; who is master over us?" (Psalm 12:4.)

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

One writer gives a careful answer about who these dignities are.

The false teachers spoke evil of glories, which I assume suggests angelic powers.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Michael's Restraint

The next verse answers these men by contrast, and the contrast reaches even to Satan.

Even Michael the archangel is a sobering example for us. Though himself in a high position, he would not dare to rail against Satan, who is a dignity also. We must show him serious respect, for he is a dignity. Satan is not an authority over believers, and they must not obey him. But they must not ridicule him or dare to show contempt toward him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Opposite Spirit

Jude warns against a second error too, so that avoiding one does not tip us into the other.

God forbid that anyone should say or write anything that would tend to weaken or undermine the spiritual authority of rulers, pastors, teachers or overseers given by the Lord Himself. God forbid that anyone should stir up in the churches a spirit of disregard and opposition against any true spiritual authority appointed by God. Such a spirit is not from above but from beneath. Jude warns us against two evil extremes. One is "showing favouritism to gain advantage." The other is "despising dominion and speaking evil of dignities."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Dreaming first. The root sin is living by your own imagination instead of by the word of God, which carries His authority.

- Then the body. Dreaming ends in defiled flesh. In Scripture, a big religious profession with nothing behind it always sits next to shameful sin.

- Then authority. Self-will refuses every authority above it. Jude names no particular office, because he condemns the unsubmissive spirit itself.

- Then the tongue. Railing is the fruit of that contempt. It is the speech of people who give reverence to no one, in heaven or on earth.

- The pattern to copy. Michael would not rail even at Satan. Copy that restraint: never weaken true God-given authority, and never flatter men to gain advantage.

Jude 1:9 · Darby

But Michael the archangel, when disputing with the devil he reasoned about the body of Moses, did not dare to bring a railing judgment against [him], but said, [The] Lord rebuke thee.

Jude has just described men who defile the flesh, reject authority, and insult glorious beings. Beside them he sets Michael the archangel, who would not insult even the devil when the two argued over the body of Moses.

Why Jude Brings Michael In

Jude does not tell this story to satisfy curiosity about angels. He holds it up against the men he is exposing.

The only reason this dispute between the archangel and Satan is brought in is to show the real character of those who speak evil of dignities. These men allow themselves to speak with insults. The archangel would not, even when dealing with Satan, the embodiment of all evil, and even though he knew Satan's hatred of the people of God. Instead he acted "with the seriousness of one who acts according to God," and appealed to the judgment of God Himself. And in doing so he uses the very words the Lord Himself uses: "The Lord rebuke you." The Lord said this when Satan stood at His right hand to resist Jehovah's gracious action for Jerusalem, represented by Joshua the high priest (Zechariah 3:1-2).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Who Michael Is

Scripture names Michael in only a handful of places, and one pattern runs through them all.

But who is Michael (which means "who is like God")? This distinguished angel is named five times in Scripture (Daniel 10:13, 21; Daniel 12:1; Jude 9; Revelation 12:7). He seems to be the leader of the angelic ranks, since Jude calls him "the archangel." In Daniel 10:13, where Michael is first named, the margin calls him "first of the chief princes" (ESV: "one of the chief princes"). In each of the five passages where his name occurs, and in their contexts, the Jewish people are in question. Clearly he is the angel charged with guarding the interests of Israel.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The Body of Moses

Why fight over a dead body? One answer looks at how Israel treated Moses while he lived, and at what his corpse could have become.

The accounts of Moses in Exodus and Numbers show how constantly the people of Israel argued with him, grumbled against him, and spoke evil of him... But the moment he was dead, what would that same devil not have given for the body! He had stirred the people up against Moses while Moses was alive. The dead body would have become a relic... So the devil would have gained twice over. First he set them against Moses while he was alive. And he would have gained still more after Moses' death, by making them worshippers of Moses. So we can easily understand why the Lord buried the body Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Commentators differ here, and some refuse to settle it at all.

Of the nature of his reasoning with the devil about the body of Moses we have absolutely no knowledge. Speculations on the subject have been endless, above all those built on the mysterious statement in Deuteronomy 34:6. But this is one of God's secrets, and man cannot penetrate it.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

A Fact Told Only Once

Because the event appears nowhere else in Scripture, some have treated it as borrowed folklore. Others answer that the source is the Spirit, not tradition.

Jude does not quote from tradition. He does not quote from a source that is no longer available, nor, as some suppose, from one of Zechariah's visions (chapter 3). The Holy Spirit revealed to him what actually happened when Moses had died.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What matters is who is speaking.

If this is confined to that one Scripture, so be it; one clear word of God is as sure as a thousand.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Not Answer Back

Michael's restraint is a pattern to copy. Insults drag the better man down to the worse.

Suppose two people are trading insults, a good man and a bad man. If the bad man's abuse provokes the good man to answer in kind, the good man comes down to his level. It does not lessen the other man's abuse at all... Here we have the beautiful conduct of the angel as a pattern for the saint. We should not be provoked. When people insult us, we should not insult them back, but act as the Lord Himself acted. He committed Himself to Him who judges righteously.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

There is also something owed to what Satan still is, fallen though he is.

The devil is fallen now, but he was once a high dignity in the angelic realm. Until God strips him of that rank, his dignity should be respected. Even so high an angelic dignity as Michael respected it. He did not take it on himself to rebuke him, but left the Lord to do it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Contrast. Jude sets men who insult authority beside the archangel who would not. The verse exists to make that comparison sting.

- Contender. Scripture names Michael five times. He leads the angels and guards Israel's interests, so his restraint is not weakness but rank under orders.

- Corpse. The devil wanted Moses' body. Many say he meant to make it a relic for worship, which is why God buried Moses Himself. Others say the reason stays God's secret.

- Confidence. Scripture records the event nowhere else, yet one clear word of God is as sure as a thousand.

- Copy it. Answering abuse with abuse lowers you to the abuser's level. Michael's "The Lord rebuke you" hands the case to the Judge. That is the pattern to follow.

Jude 1:10 · Darby

But these, whatever things they know not, they speak railingly against; but what even, as the irrational animals, they understand by mere nature, in these things they corrupt themselves.

Jude has just pointed to Michael the archangel, who would not hurl abuse even at the devil. These men are his opposite: they attack what they cannot know, and they ruin themselves by what they do know.

Who "these" are

The word "these" points back to people Jude has already described. They are not outsiders attacking from a distance. They hold a place inside the church.

"But these speak evil" — this now refers to people who had been baptised and had taken their place in the church. Even so, they were giving in to every form of corruption, and were abandoning the very things they professed. I do not say that they were outside. This is the difference between Jude and John. When we come to John's Epistle they went out; but the corrupting thing in Jude is that there they are poisoning others.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two different words for knowing

The verse uses two words for knowing. What they "know not" is conscious knowledge. What they "know naturally" is knowledge picked up by experience, the way an expert knows his trade.

epistamai mainly means to know something by being close to it… It is the knowledge gained by experience — the knowledge of an expert… In Jude 10 there is what they do not know (they had no conscious knowledge of it, oida), and what they know naturally, epistamai.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

Why they cannot know

"Speak evil" translates a harsh word — the same one used for blasphemy. What they attack is the very thing their condition shuts them out of.

The reader will notice how the word railing keeps coming back. In verses 8 and 10 it is translated "speak evil." To show what it means, it is enough to say that the gospels use the same word in the phrase "blaspheme against the Holy Spirit" (Mark 3:29). It is a word that shows the will and the corruption of the heart at deadly work… They speak abusively against the things they do not know. These are probably the spiritual things, the divine truths the Christians around them spoke of — things they could not grasp. For "the natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned" (1 Cor. 2:14). As for the things they understand by mere nature, in these they corrupt themselves, using them only to satisfy their own appetites and passions.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Lower than the animals

The comparison to unreasoning animals is not just calling these men animal-like. An animal that follows instinct is only being an animal. A man who does the same adds something the animal never had.

In the things they know naturally they corrupt themselves. As one has truly said, "a man cannot become like an animal without sinking far below the animal; and what in the animal only shows the absence of a moral element, in man will show the presence of an immoral one."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Both halves of the charge

Neither side of their life escapes. Their ignorance produces abuse. Their knowledge produces filth. Older translations put the second half of the verse as "in these things they corrupt themselves," and the writers quoted here follow that wording.

Verse 10 contains a very cutting indictment. Men who are ignorant as well as arrogant usually fall to abusing what they do not understand. These men did that. They also corrupted themselves in the natural things they did understand… Things spiritual they rail at. In things natural they corrupt themselves. Truly a terrible indictment!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The warning for us

Jude's contrast between Michael and "these" leaves a lesson about our own speech. Answering abuse with abuse never wins.

Suppose two people are railing, a good man and a bad man. The bad man's railing provokes the good man to rail. Then the good man goes down to the level of the bad. It does not lessen the other man's railing at all… The angel's beautiful conduct is a pattern for the believer. We should not be provoked. When we are insulted, we should not insult back, but act as the Lord Himself acted. He committed Himself to Him who judges righteously.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Yet Kelly is careful to separate two things that look alike. Jude himself writes with great force against these men, and that is not the same fault.

Strong language against what is good is disgraceful. Against what is bad it is thoroughly right… Railing is abuse of what is good. Here we have the sharpest and most cutting exposure of what is evil.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Inside. These men are not outside critics. They hold a place among Christians and poison others from within.

- Ignorant. They attack spiritual truth. As natural men, they cannot reach it.

- Abusive. The word for "speak evil" is the word for blasphemy. It shows the will and the heart's corruption at work.

- Debased. What they do understand, they understand only by instinct. In a man, instinct produces immorality, not innocence. It sinks him below the animal.

- Answered. Michael is the pattern. He did not insult back but left the case with the Lord. Naming evil is still right, because exposing what is bad is not railing.

Jude 1:11 · Darby

Woe to them! because they have gone in the way of Cain, and given themselves up to the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.

Jude pronounces a woe on men who teach error inside the church, and points back to three names: Cain, Balaam and Korah. Commentators read the three as one road with three stages, and the road ends in the word "perished."

Three stages of one decline

The three names are not chosen at random. Each marks a distinct way the self takes control of religion.

He traces the progress of the apostasy that he foretells, under three heads. First, "the way of Cain," which was a way of self-will in approaching God: he ignored God's way and came in his own way. Second, "the error of Balaam for reward." This was self-seeking under cover of religion. Third, "Korah's rebellion," which was self-assertion in the things of God. Jude shows that when the opposers reach this third stage, they will perish.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why Korah comes last

Korah lived long before Balaam, so Jude's list is not a timeline. The three verbs climb instead — here in an older translation — and Jude holds Korah back to the end for a reason.

Note the progression in these statements: "gone"; "ran greedily after"; and "perished." … The Apostle Jude places "the rebellion of Korah" out of its historical order, for Korah came before Balaam in the history of Israel (Num. 16). But Jude mentions Korah's great sin last in this passage because it is so serious.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The way of Cain

Cain took the place of a worshipper, and there was nothing wrong with the offering he brought. The defect lay somewhere else.

Cain sees nothing wrong with the offering itself — with the materials it was made of. But there was one vital defect that ruined him completely: there was no faith. There is no mention of God, which there must be; and there was no judgment of his own sinfulness either.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Cain's way is not irreligion at all.

That was "the way of Cain," and millions are rushing along that road at this moment. Such people are by no means without the religious element in their character. They would like to offer something to God; to do something for Him. They deem it right to present to Him the results of their own toil. They are ignorant of themselves, ignorant of God … They reject God's remedy to cleanse, and they put man's effort to improve in its place. This is "the way of Cain."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The error of Balaam

Balaam is the man who made religion pay. Jude ties his error to gain.

Covetousness ruled this desperately wicked man. To get gain he would gladly make money out of the people of God. He was even ready to preach error if that would win him the reward. This has rightly been called the church error. Think how many people hold high office in the professing church and simply use the position to make money out of the people of God. They are ready to teach error to get rewards.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The rebellion of Korah

Korah's rebellion was a grab at the priesthood. Commentators read it as a revolt aimed at Christ.

Korah's rebellion is a revolt against the authority of Christ and against the special character of His priesthood. A man stirs up this revolt who holds the position of a minister but pretends that he is a priest. In doing so he sets aside the only true heavenly priesthood, the priesthood of Christ.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Korah's sin ran in two directions at once, and both are visible now.

The sin of Korah was twofold. He openly rebelled against Moses and Aaron, saying, "You have gone too far! … why then do you exalt yourselves above the assembly of the LORD?" And, not content with his own position, he seized the place of priestly intercession that belonged to Aaron alone (Num. 16:3, 9-10). He sought to drag Moses and Aaron down to the level of the congregation, and to lift himself up to the level of Aaron. … Christ is degraded to the level of fallen man, and man is exalted to the level of God.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the woe is final

Jude does not say these men were in danger of perishing. He says they perished. Commentators draw a line here between slipping back and apostasy — abandoning the faith for good.

For the person who slips back there is a way of recovery. For the apostate there is nothing but a fearful expectation of judgment, and a fiery anger that will consume God's enemies.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Self-will — Cain's way is worship on man's own terms: an offering without faith, and no judgment of his own sin.

- Self-seeking — Balaam's error turns religion into a trade. It teaches what pays, and makes money out of God's people.

- Self-assertion — Korah's rebellion is the end of the road. A minister claims to be a priest, and pushes aside the priesthood of Christ.

- Progression — the verbs mark the slide: they went, they ran, they perished. Jude lists Korah last, out of historical order, because his sin is the worst.

- Finality — the one who slips back can be restored. The apostate has no road back, only the judgment this woe announces.

Jude 1:12 · Darby

These are spots in your love-feasts, feasting together [with you] without fear, pasturing themselves; clouds without water, carried along by [the] winds; autumnal trees, without fruit, twice dead, rooted up;

Jude piles up image after image. He is describing men who had slipped in among believers and sat at their shared meals as if they belonged. Each picture takes something that ought to promise good — a meal, a shepherd, a cloud, a tree — and shows it empty.

Hidden reefs at the love feast

The words "hidden reefs" point to a danger under the surface. The setting is a shared meal the early Christians called a love feast.

Some scholars think the word for spots is better translated "sunken rocks" (spilos). They are like icebergs, hiding their danger below the surface. This was what the ones Jude writes about were like while revelling at the love feasts (agapai). These feasts appear to have been a shared evening meal among the Lord's people in the early years of the church. The meal ended with the Lord's Supper... These men were spots or blemishes in the Christian company. They had crept in among the saints at this early date, but they had no link with Christ their Head. They were pasturing themselves, tending their own wants, seeking their own things. These intrusions were false shepherds without an atom of love for others. This is like the shepherds in Ezekiel 34:8 who "have fed themselves, and have not fed my sheep." They not only neglect the sheep, they also lead them astray.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

Feasting without fear

"Without fear" here is no compliment. It shows a hard heart at a sacred table.

These men were a hidden danger to the saints they met with. Being what they were, they feasted together with them without fear, pasturing themselves. What a proof of hard hearts and seared consciences! They were hypocrites, yet they mingled with the saints of God. They claimed to enjoy what the saints enjoyed, and they were not afraid.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Clouds that carry no rain

In a dry land a cloud on the horizon raises hope. Jude's point is what happens when it passes over and nothing falls.

They are like clouds carried along on the winds, yet without water. In the land where Jude wrote, clouds were welcome as giving promise of rain. So these men looked as if they were bringing refreshment to God's weary people. But they had nothing to give. Satan's power drove them along, and the wind is a picture of that power.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Grant looks at what steers them.

Clouds, with great promise of blessing, but empty of true refreshment. They are carried about by winds, shifting in any direction that circumstances and their own inclinations lead them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Trees in the season when fruit is due

Autumn is the test. A tree with no fruit at harvest has failed at the one time it was meant to deliver.

Then again they are like trees "whose fruit withers," or "autumn trees." Autumn is when we expect to find fruit on the trees, but these trees have none. These men are marked by promise without performance, for they are twice dead — first by nature and then as coming under the judgment of God. When Jude speaks of them as rooted up, he is no doubt looking ahead to the judgment they will come under.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Twice dead

Commentators differ on the second death. Hole ties it to judgment. Grant ties it to apostasy — turning away from a faith once claimed.

They are twice dead. First in nature, which is true of all unbelievers. Second in regard to their spiritual pretence. They had the advantage of a link with the testimony of God, in which there is life, but they revolted from it into the dead state of apostasy. Being plucked up by the roots is no doubt prophetic.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Walter Scott presses what that second death looks like from the outside: it is "the open, public renunciation of all external relationship to God, as in Jude 12 — 'twice dead,' even when physically alive."

Why the warning lands inside the church

The shock of the verse is who it is about. Jude is not describing the world outside. He is describing people at the same table.

I cannot imagine anyone but an inspired man daring to use such firm and solemn language about those who were inside the church. That is a marked point of this letter... Jude looks especially at those who took the place of salvation, those who gathered to the name of the Lord... There is nothing more dangerous than a departure from the faith.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Promise. Every image in the verse offers something: a shared meal, a shepherd, a rain cloud, a fruit tree. Every one of them fails to deliver.

- Emptiness. The clouds hold no water. They look like refreshment, but they have nothing to give. A power not their own drives them along.

- Season. Autumn is when fruit is due, so barren trees at that point mean promise without performance.

- Death. "Twice dead" means dead by nature, like all unbelievers, and dead again by turning away from the testimony of God.

- Uprooting. Jude speaks of the uprooting as already done. Their judgment is settled.

Jude 1:13 · Darby

raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shames; wandering stars, to whom has been reserved the gloom of darkness for eternity.

Jude ends his list of pictures with the sea and the sky. He is describing men who had slipped into the Christian gatherings. Both look impressive from a distance. Both end in nothing. So where does a life cut loose from God finish?

Waves that cannot rest

The sea image is force with nothing steering it. Notice what these waves put on display, and that the word for shame is plural.

They are also like waves of the sea, raging and foaming. They were uncontrolled except by the power of Satan, and it was their own shame that they displayed. The word, we are told, is in the plural, "shames." It means the things which were a shame to them, not that they felt any shame in them. Probably they did not, but gloried in them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

adds missing word-meaning of "foaming out"; tightens lead-in

"But the wicked" — a solemn word of contrast — "are like the tossing sea; for it cannot be quiet, and its waters toss up mire and dirt." Or, as we read in Jude, "wild waves of the sea, casting up the foam of their own shame." What a vivid picture, drawn by the Holy Spirit, of the state of a soul without God! And at the foot of the canvas He adds only this word, as an eternal inscription: "There is no peace," says my God, "for the wicked."

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Stars off their orbit

A star is meant to hold a course. These had broken from theirs, and nothing could pull them back.

They were also "wandering stars," stars which had left their own orbit and were now rushing, uncontrolled and uncontrollable, to their destruction; and so Jude adds, "for whom the gloom of utter darkness has been reserved forever."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What holds a planet steady is not itself but the sun it circles. Take that away and you have the description of every man apart from God.

Instead of being like a planet, shining with steady light and moving evenly onward in its orbit, controlled by the sun, man has become like a "wandering star," pursuing an erratic course he knows not where; though Scripture significantly says, "for whom the gloom of utter darkness has been reserved forever" (Jude 13).

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Darkness kept in reserve

These men set themselves up as lights. Jude says where that light ends, and what happens to shame that is never covered.

He speaks of these would-be "illuminators" and says they are like comets or shooting stars. They are not exactly on an aimless wander. Like planets moving on a fixed path, they are set in their harmful ways, wandering from the way of truth and following a path of error and deceit. They have no light to give. Only a fearful gloom and murkiness of spiritual darkness is reserved for them forever. Their doom there is a perpetual exposure of their shame. They remain eternally unforgiven and forever unatoned for, with nothing to cover their sins and shame.

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

That darkness is not an arbitrary sentence. It is what is left when God is shut out.

It is the home of wicked spirits and will mark the place of punishment of the wicked. Matthew 8:12; 2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6, 13. God is light, and Christ came into the world as the true light. Everything shut out from God, or opposed to God and to the Lord Jesus, must share in moral darkness.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Evil inside the circle

The sting is where these people stood: not outside the church, but among those gathered in the Lord's name.

I cannot imagine anyone but an inspired man daring to use such decided and solemn language about those who were within the church. Jude looks especially at those who took the place of salvation, those who were gathered to the name of the Lord... There is nothing more dangerous than a departure from the faith, the Christian faith. We are responsible not only for what man is and has done, but also for what grace has made known — most of all if we turn from it in unbelief. What is so evil as apostasy?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one who keeps

Darkness is what is "reserved" for the wandering star. The letter ends on the opposite note.

When we come to verses 24 and 25, how delightful is the contrast with all that has gone before! We come out from the darkness of human wickedness and apostasy. We come out even from the struggles and efforts of true saints in the presence of the evil. We come into the clear light of the power and glory of God. Our eyes are lifted to "Him who is able to keep you from stumbling." Here, and here only, is real rest for the heart.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Loose — the waves are uncontrolled and the stars have left their orbit. Nothing holds either one on course.

- Loud — the foam they throw up is their own shame. The word is plural: the disgraceful things themselves, which they gloried in instead of blushing at.

- Lightless — they set up as lights, yet they have none to give, and nothing will ever cover their shame.

- Locked in — the gloom reserved for them is what remains when God, who is light, is shut out.

- Kept — the danger sat inside the circle of those gathered to the Lord's name. The only rest is in "Him who is able to keep you from stumbling."

Jude 1:14 · Darby

And Enoch, [the] seventh from Adam, prophesied also as to these, saying, Behold, [the] Lord has come amidst his holy myriads,

Jude has been describing men who slipped into the Christian company unnoticed. Now he quotes Enoch, who spoke before the flood, and those old words raise three questions: why Enoch is called the seventh from Adam, who comes with the Lord, and how the prophecy reached Jude.

A prophecy aimed at "these"

The words are not a general announcement of judgment. Jude says Enoch prophesied "about these" — the very men he has been describing.

The epistle is striking in this: it shows the decline of the church. False brothers came in unnoticed. Their character marked out the state of the professing church in the last days. They are the object of the Lord's judgment when He appears.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

That gives the whole letter its shape. One writer traces the line from the opening warning to this closing scene:

Certain men have crept into the Christian profession (verse 4) — that is the start. Enoch's prophecy, that judgment will be executed on all (verses 14, 15), declares the finish.

Modernised from Dr. Daniel W. PatersonOriginal wording

"The seventh from Adam"

Commentators differ on those four words. One takes them as plain identification, then explains how a prophecy from that far back reaches beyond its own day:

There is something unusual when it says, "Enoch, the seventh from Adam." People have made something of that because they do not understand it. But it is very simple. There was more than one Enoch. There was an Enoch before this one — an Enoch the son of Cain. We should not look for prophecy in a son of Cain... We can hardly doubt that Enoch prophesied about the people of his own day. Prophecy always takes its start from what is present... But the Spirit of God also reaches from the beginning right on to the end.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another finds meaning in the number itself:

Enoch was number seven in the line of descent through Seth. Genesis 5 shows it plainly. But one might wonder why Jude should spend even four words drawing our attention to it. Seven is in Scripture the number of perfection and completeness... Ten patriarchs lived before the flood. It was fitting, then, that number seven should be the one in whom faith and the life of faith came out in its completeness.

Modernised from Frank Binford HoleOriginal wording

Which coming this is

Scripture names more than one future judgment, and only one fits a Lord who arrives with others. (Where the ESV says "holy ones", the writers quoted here say "saints".)

Now there are only two scenes named in Scripture to which this can refer. One is the judgment of the great white throne at the end of the world, and Scripture says nothing there about the saints being present. The other is the coming of Christ to take His earthly dominion. There, as we have already seen, the saints go out with Him as the armies of heaven, clothed in His likeness. They are His companions in executing judgment on His foes.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Coming for them, then with them

If the Lord arrives surrounded by His own, a question follows about how they got there.

A thoughtful listener might have asked, "How can so many saints come with the Lord?" The obvious answer would be that He must come for them before He can bring them with Him.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Enoch's own life pictured that answer:

Enoch was taken up to heaven so that he would not see death. He was carried away from the earth before the judgment of the flood. So he is a type of the church — a picture of the saints who will be caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. That happens before the man of sin appears and the great tribulation comes.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Jude and the book of Enoch

Many suggest Jude borrowed from an old Jewish book that carries Enoch's name. Comparing the two settles it:

The existing book of Enoch, translated into the Ethiopic language, may have had a Hebrew original, as it is a Jewish production... It was probably written after Jude gave the words of Enoch by divine inspiration. Jude's words (verses 14, 15) are divine truth, so the matching language in the Ethiopic is certainly false. For this fake book makes the Lord execute judgment on His saints. That goes directly against His own word in John 5:24.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer leaves open how Jude got the words:

We have no indication that it was passed down in any written form, and it was quite possible for the Holy Spirit to have given it again to Jude. I do not venture to say that this is how it happened; we really do not know. But we do know, however Jude got it, that it is divine.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the message came from

Enoch's message grew out of his manner of life.

The man who walked with God was entrusted with a testimony... God is sure to reveal His mind to the man who values fellowship with Him, for He loves to share His thoughts with His own.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Walk — Enoch walked with God, and that fellowship gave him God's message of coming judgment to pass on.

- Warning — Enoch spoke "about these": the men who slipped into the Christian company unnoticed, who face the Lord's judgment when He appears.

- Withdrawal — God took Enoch to heaven before the flood, a picture of saints caught up before the tribulation.

- With — the Lord returns with His holy ones, so He must first come for them.

- Warrant — the words do not come from a Jewish book that has the Lord judging His own saints. The Spirit gave them, and they carry God's authority.

Jude 1:15 · Darby

to execute judgment against all; and to convict all the ungodly of them of all their works of ungodliness, which they have wrought ungodlily, and of all the hard [things] which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.

Jude quotes a warning that Enoch spoke before the flood, and that day of judgment has still not come. The verse names what the Lord comes to do — and it lists words alongside deeds on the charge sheet.

The oldest prophecy in the Bible

This is the earliest prophecy the Bible records. God took Enoch out of the world before judgment fell on it.

To a Christian, the preservation of this prophecy has a moving interest. The passage adds, to a truth taught elsewhere, that Enoch prophesied it. So we have a testimony that even before the flood the man of God had already announced the judgment of the world he was leaving. He "walked with God," and God took him out of the world, as the church will one day be taken. "Known to God are all His works, from the beginning of the world." He fixes all His purposes beforehand. That stays true whatever His patience may be, and however He deals with man in long-suffering and righteousness before He carries those purposes out.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Who is judged and who comes with Him

The verse puts two groups in view. The "all" who face judgment are not the ones who arrive with the Lord.

"Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints, to" — what does Scripture say? — to "execute judgment upon all." This is not the saints. The "all" are completely distinct from the saints. The saints had been caught up, and now come with Him who executes the judgment on all the sinners found in that day. "To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all" — to make it perfectly plain who are meant — all "that are ungodly among them."

required note on non-ESV wording

That order of events explains how believers can be with Him at the very moment judgment falls.

When the wickedness of man rises then to its full height, God will strike in judgment. The Lord Jesus, who once bore judgment for our sakes, is then to be its Executor, and that oldest of all prophecies given through the lips of a man will be fulfilled: "Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints to execute judgment upon all" (Jude 14, 15). Beforehand the saints will have been "changed" according to 1 Corinthians 15, and "caught up" according to 1 Thessalonians 4, so they are with Him in a glorified condition.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Four uses of one word

One word keeps returning in this verse. Each use covers a different part of a person's life.

He will execute judgment, bringing solemn conviction to all the ungodly. This word "ungodly" comes four times in verse 15. It marks first men's characters, second their conduct, third their motives, and fourth their words. In all of these things they choose to refuse any recognition of God, and yet they keep up a pretence of religion. What sheer terror it will be for them when their hypocrisy is unmasked!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Hard speeches

Jude charges words as well as deeds. Kelly weighs which of the two does more harm.

Here it is plain that ungodly words are just as bad in their own way as ungodly deeds. Sometimes an ungodly word does more harm than an ungodly deed. For instance, an ungodly deed might be an act of unrighteousness in a man, but an ungodly word might be a slur on Christ. This is worse, especially if people accept it. People are quite ready to cry out against an ungodly deed. Even worldly men can judge ungodly deeds well enough. Yet the same people would be deceived by hard and ungodly words against the Lord and His grace and truth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Jude charges these words as spoken against the Lord Himself. That charge reaches further than it looks.

We are told that one special thing the Lord is coming to judge is "all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him," Jude 15. There is no present ridicule of His saints that will not be counted as against Himself in that day.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where Jude aims it

Enoch spoke to the world before the flood. Jude applies the words to a narrower target.

It is important to notice the use the Spirit of God makes of Enoch's words in Jude. He does not apply them to the world, but to the professing Church. This short letter has for its theme the entry, growth, and judgment of evil in Christendom. "The ungodly amongst them" means wicked men amongst Christians. How many in our day, in pulpit and press, are saying "hard speeches against Him"!

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why believers need not answer back

Because the verdict is certain, believers can leave insults unanswered.

Hard speeches against the Christ of God must stir the righteous indignation of the true children of God. And yet to a very large extent they can afford to treat the authors of these hard speeches with silent contempt. They know that the time is soon coming when God will deal with all in judgment. For centuries He has kept silence and borne with long-suffering patience. All that time men have grown ever bolder in rebellion, heaping up wrath against the day of wrath. But at last every "hard speech" will receive its crushing answer, and every opposer will be silenced and condemned.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Spoken first. The earliest recorded prophecy came from a man God took out of the world before judgment fell. God fixes His purposes long before He carries them out.

- Comes with. The saints come with the Lord, not among the "all" He judges. He caught them up first.

- Convicts fourfold. "Ungodly" appears four times over character, conduct, motives and words — the whole person, religious pretence and all.

- Counts words. Hard speeches stand beside ungodly deeds, and mockery aimed at His people is counted as spoken against Him.

- Closes the case. Jude aims the warning at Christendom itself. Mocked believers can stay silent now, because every hard speech will get its answer then.

Jude 1:16 · Darby

These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their lusts; and their mouth speaks swelling words, admiring persons for the sake of profit.

Jude has just recalled Enoch's prophecy of the Lord coming to judge. Now he turns back to the men he is exposing and describes their words, their motives and their manners. The picture is ugly: grumbling, self-pleasing, big talk and flattery for profit. Commentators press one uncomfortable question. Is this only about them?

Grumbling that nothing can satisfy

The first two words are not just synonyms. One commentator explains the exact sense of the second:

He says, "These are grumblers," and he adds, "malcontents" — not content with their lot. That is the strict literal meaning of the word. They are people who like to be something more and greater than they are — greater than God ever called them to be. They want to be somebody.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That explains why their grievances never get resolved. The problem is not where they think it is:

Jude calls them grumblers and complainers. They are dissatisfied people with grievances. But the cause of it all does not lie in the people they blame. It lies in their own lusts. Their lusts so dominate them that nothing would satisfy them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Desires wider than sexual sin

Many read "following their own sinful desires" as sexual sin only. Kelly, using the older wording "lusts", widens it and links that appetite to the flattery at the end of the verse:

"These are grumblers, malcontents"; and what is the cause of that? "Walking after their own lusts." Do not suppose that lust means only gross lust. There are refined lusts — vanity, pride, ambition. What are all these but lusts? They are all lusts. They are the lusts of the devil... They love to gather a party around them, above all if they can count some rich people in it, "to gain advantage."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel in the wilderness, and flattery for profit

Jude's words carry the reader back to a nation that grumbled its way through the desert. They also expose what the flattery is for:

Grumbling and complaining marked Israel in the wilderness, above all the mixed crowd who travelled with them... The next clause goes down to the root of the evil — following their own sinful desires. They were governed by their own inclinations and desires, and not by the will of God... Finally, they were loud and boastful talkers, using swelling words. They were flatterers too, fawning on anyone they could make a profit out of. Scripture tells us again and again that God shows no favoritism. But favoritism is exactly what these "dreamers" showed, and they showed it for their own advantage.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Praise transferred from Christ to men

The verse before speaks of harsh words against the Lord. This verse speaks of boastful words about men. One writer sets the two side by side:

But those who have belittled Christ have always exalted man. If they have spoken harsh words against the Christ of God, they have also spoken boastful words about sinful men. Belittling Christ is always linked with admiring man. And behind the harsh words against Christ there is always a low way of life... Lust is the real secret of antagonism to Christ and admiration of man.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The same test in a believer's heart

The habit Jude names is not confined to the men he is exposing. It can hide behind a good profession:

We may put on a good show of faith in front of one another. Yet too often, in our hearts which God sees, we may be "showing favoritism to gain advantage". We then value riches and social position more than spirituality and the lowly graces of the One who was "gentle and lowly in heart".

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

One character, from Enoch to the end

Why aim a prophecy from Enoch's day at people troubling Christians now? Because the type of man has not changed:

Enoch prophesied of these. I do not know anything more striking than that. There are the same people now as in Enoch's day... But Jude carried us on to the coming of the Lord. The people on the earth when the Lord comes will be the same kind of wicked people as in the days of Enoch and of Jude. Evil, you see, goes on. Evil retains its own terrible character.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Root — Their own desires drive everything else in the verse. Those desires include the refined kinds: vanity, pride and ambition.

- Grumbling — Desire rules them, so they grumble and complain. Their grievance lies in themselves, not in the people they blame.

- Flattery — The same appetite produces big talk and flattery. They fawn on important people to get something out of them.

- Exchange — Belittling Christ and admiring man travel together. They keep their praise from Him and spend it on people who can pay.

- Mirror — This fault is not far from us. A good show of faith can still hide a heart that values riches and status above the lowly graces of Christ.

Jude 1:17 · Darby

But *ye*, beloved, remember the words spoken before by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ,

Jude has just described men who crept in among God's people, and now he turns to the believers themselves. His first instruction to them is not something new: he tells them to remember what the apostles had already said.

The turn toward the beloved

Jude now speaks to the saints, who had kept clear of the evils he described.

Jude next turns his attention to the saints themselves, to those who were walking apart from the evils he had pointed out. He strengthens their souls with the words of wisdom and guidance they needed. He also shows them how they may be kept safe from the tricks and seductions of the enemy. And what a relief it must have been to turn from his solemn condemnation of these men who had abandoned the faith to the encouragement of the beloved saints!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The name Jude gives them carries more than his own affection:

Jude addresses the saints here, and in verse 20, as "beloved." In this he expresses his own love in the Spirit, and he is also in communion with the heart of God the Father concerning His people.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Remember the words, not just the ideas

Jude tells them to remember words. Older translations read here "the words spoken beforehand by the apostles."

If we are to contend for the faith, how important it is that we "remember" the very words in which the truth came to us through the apostles. Critics may question the apostles' words, and theologians may belittle them. But the Word itself states that if a man is spiritual, he will acknowledge that the things written by the apostles are "the commandments of the Lord" (1 Cor. 14:37). What is more, submitting to apostolic teaching is the great test that shows by what spirit a man speaks (1 John 4:6).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What Jude is pointing them back to

These readers had heard the apostles with their own ears.

So Jude points out the antidote: "the words spoken beforehand by the apostles." Notice, not traditions, but words spoken in their own hearing. "They told you" — the apostles' own words. What those words were to the people who heard them, their writings are to us.

Modernised from Six LettersOriginal wording

Which apostles said it

Jude does not name the apostles he means. We can still read their warnings.

Well, we have at least two of these apostles. Surely that is quite enough. Very likely the other apostles taught the very same things by word of mouth. But we have this warning about these characters, written down by two besides Jude: one the apostle Paul, the other Peter in both his letters.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer points to the place where such a warning stands written:

Jude also tells us to remember the things the apostles of the Lord had said before he wrote this letter. In 2 Peter 3:3 we read about mockers coming in the last time, following their own lusts. But clearly the other apostles had testified to the same effect.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why forewarning is a mercy

God warns His people ahead of time, and that changes how they meet the evil when it comes.

First and foremost, he would have them recall the warnings the apostles had given... The Lord never leaves His people without advance warning about the dangers and enemies they will meet. If they store His warnings in their minds, they are neither surprised nor discouraged when there are fears inside as well as fights outside. They are ready for conflict with every form of Satan's hostility. The Lord Himself said to His disciples, "For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect. See, I have told you beforehand" (Matt. 24:24-25).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Corruption in the church can then be met without shock, and even with strengthened confidence:

So while we cannot help grieving over the corruption, there is no reason for surprise and no need to be disheartened; rather our faith should be confirmed as we see the apostles' words fulfilled.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The first resource named

Jude gives the beloved several things to do, and this one comes first.

"But you, beloved" (verses 17, 20) — how refreshing to see how Jude marks out the loyal-hearted and holy brothers of Christ... And the first thing he asks is this: "remember" the spoken words of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ. This points us first of all to the supreme authority of Scripture, the sure foundation and unfailing resource for faith in this day of evil.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Beloved — Jude turns from the men who abandoned the faith to the saints he loves. What he hands them first is a memory, not new teaching.

- Remember — the call is to the very words the truth came in through the apostles. Scripture calls those words the commandments of the Lord.

- Not tradition — the readers had heard the apostles speak. What those spoken words were to them, the apostles' writings are to us.

- Forewarned — Paul and Peter wrote the warnings down. So evil in the church brings no surprise and no discouragement.

- Resource — remembering comes first in what Jude asks. Scripture is the sure foundation and unfailing resource for faith in an evil day.

Jude 1:18 · Darby

that they said to you, that at [the] end of the time there should be mockers, walking after their own lusts of ungodlinesses.

The apostles had already warned that scoffers would come, and Jude tells his readers to remember it. Nothing about them should shake believers, because that warning named both the time they would appear and the desires driving them.

The warning was already on record

Jude does not claim a fresh revelation; he points back to what the apostles had said. One writer counts at least two of them who left the warning in writing. Jude, he says, describes a worse stage of the same evil.

We have at least two of these apostles. Surely that is quite enough. Very likely the other apostles taught the very same things by word of mouth. But two others besides Jude wrote this warning down about these characters — the apostle Paul, and Peter in both his letters... And I think that Jude goes still further, and that his letter came after Second Peter, for this reason: there is an advance of evil. Peter speaks of unrighteous men; Jude speaks of men that once seemed to have the truth, and through their bad life, bad ways, pride, vanity, or whatever it was, they lost it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What a mocker is

A mocker treats sacred things as a joke while wearing the Christian name.

He tells the saints that they have been well warned of these things. "There will be mockers, walking after their own worldly, ungodly lusts." You will not only find men of God — they are always there. You will find mockers and scoffers, who profess the name of Christ and scoff at everything that is divine.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Kelly ranks mockery among the worst features of evil, and traces it to men who set themselves up as thinkers.

Not merely unrighteous men, or lawless men, but one of the worst features of evil — "mockers"... Here we find that it is not little children in their folly, but the case of men who claimed wisdom; and the way they showed it was by "mocking"!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Passions set on ungodliness

The phrase is tighter than it first sounds. It is not simply that these men have strong desires and happen to be ungodly; ungodliness is the thing they want.

"Mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts" — their own lusts of ungodly things. The wording is stronger than that. Their lust was after ungodliness. This is what characterised their lust. It is not a vague term; it is a very exact term — "lusts of ungodliness."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Men who once sat among the saints

Jude's mockers are not outsiders throwing stones at the church from a distance.

These mockers once looked respectable. They once spoke well. They were received, they were baptised; they remembered the Lord Jesus, taking part in the assembly, no doubt. Very likely they had been preachers. But here it was clear that they were given up to their own lusts of ungodliness, and that they were mockers. So they turned with the greatest spite and hatred against the truth that once separated them from the world. They claimed to be believers, but in reality they were clearly Satan's agents.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"The last time"

One reference work ties the phrase to a mark rather than a date, and separates it from the "last days" spoken of elsewhere:

The apostle John spoke of this as already present. There were many antichrists, and this showed that the last time (literally, hour) had begun. 1 John 2:18. Turning away from apostolic doctrine was a sign of the last time (it was not exactly the "last days," as in 2 Timothy). No further revelation was to come, and if people refused this doctrine, nothing but judgement could follow.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Kelly presses the point home for today: "The last time was therefore to be an especially evil time, and it is a very solemn thing that we are in that time most fully now."

William Kelly

Why the reminder steadies believers

The point of remembering the warning is not gloom. Seeing the prediction come true should have the opposite effect.

What a comfort that we have not been left unwarned of the terrible evil. Enoch prophesied of the evil; the apostles warned us of it. So we cannot help grieving over the corruption. But there is no ground for surprise, and no need to be discouraged. Instead, seeing the apostles' words come true should confirm our faith.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Foretold — Jude adds nothing new. Paul and Peter had already written the warning down. Jude records a later, worse stage of the same evil.

- Mockers — the mark is not lawlessness alone but scorn. These men profess the name of Christ and scoff at everything divine.

- Lusts — "ungodly passions" is exact language. Ungodliness itself is what these men want, not just what they fall into.

- Insiders — they were once received, baptised, and part of the assembly, perhaps even preaching. Then they turned on the truth that had separated them from the world.

- Steadying — the warning came in advance. Seeing it come true is no reason for surprise or discouragement. It confirms that the apostles' words are true.

Jude 1:19 · Darby

These are they who set [themselves] apart, natural [men], not having [the] Spirit.

Jude has been describing men who slipped in among believers unnoticed. Here he sums them up in three short strokes, and older translations read "who separate themselves" and "sensual" — two words the whole verse turns on.

What "sensual" means

The word is easy to misread. It does not point first to immoral living, but to what these men lacked.

Every man has a soul, converted or not. Now, when we believe, we receive a nature that we never had before; we receive life in Christ. These men described here had nothing but their natural soul. They had not received life in Christ. They were merely "natural" men. "Sensual," in our language, is very often taken to mean people who are abandoned to immoral ways. These people may have been so, but that is not the meaning of the word. It is the same word that 1 Cor. 2:14 translates "natural man" and sets against the "spiritual man." So he adds here, "not having the Spirit."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The word also says what drives such men from the inside.

"Sensual" means soul-led: their own appetites and feelings govern them. Not having the Spirit, they know nothing of His power, as believers do.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Separation inside, not outside

The men Jude has in view had not walked out of the church. They drew a line inside it.

"These are they who separate themselves" means separating "within," not "without," at all. The early part of this letter makes this plain: certain men crept in. Unnoticed, they had "crept in," not "gone out." We can understand it if we bear in mind the Pharisees. The Pharisees never separated themselves from Israel. Yet the very name Pharisee means "a separatist." They were separatists within Israel, and these men were separatists within the church. In both cases it was not going out, but making a party of pride and self-righteousness within.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From inside, they kept up their work and blamed others for the trouble.

The false teachers were separating themselves. That does not mean they had left the meetings of the saints; they made subtle distinctions between themselves and others. They carried on their corrupting work from within. They made separations by their false course — no doubt accusing the saints who stayed in the truth of being the real cause of the division!

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

The spirit behind the separating

Pride can dress itself up as faithfulness. Jude's one sentence shows what God sees underneath.

They will, all the same, "separate themselves" — not from evil, moral or doctrinal, of course, but in a proud, Pharisaical spirit. They boast of superior knowledge or intellectual progress. They pretend to despise the humble Christians who still believe and rest in the word of God. They take a position apart, and may form themselves into a school of opinion. But God does not approve those who commend themselves. In one sentence Jude strips these apostates of their fine clothing and shows them as they appear before the eye of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Without the Spirit

The last phrase settles the case, and it also explains the divisions. Commentators differ over the exact wording of the first phrase.

To have the Spirit is the sure mark of really belonging to Christ. Jude describes these men as "they who separate themselves." It is very much open to question whether the word "themselves" is really in the original. The Revised Version puts it simply "who make separations." The Holy Spirit is the power of unity. These men without the Spirit were the ones stirring up disunity.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Spirit marks off this present time from every age before it.

To be without the Spirit is to lack the great privilege of a Christian. Here is the great difference between a believer now resting on redemption and an Old Testament believer. Those believers were waiting for the Spirit in the days of the Messiah. The Messiah has been rejected, yet God has poured out the Holy Spirit on us — not on those who are still waiting for the Messiah. These men had taken their place in the church, but they did not have the Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The separation God does want

The verse condemns one kind of standing apart, not every kind.

This kind of separation is completely unacceptable to God because it comes out of a feeling of superiority to others. In contrast with this there is a separation that God delights in, because it is a separation to Him. In such a case there is an answer in the heart to what He has worked in it. There is love and devotion to Him and a desire to please Him.

Modernised from Paul DronsfieldOriginal wording

Summary

- No Spirit. The last phrase is the root of the whole description. Having the Spirit is the sure mark of belonging to Christ.

- Only soul. With no life in Christ, these men have nothing but their natural soul. Appetite and feeling govern them. "Sensual" means natural; it does not by itself mean immoral.

- Inside, not outside. They had crept in, not gone out; like the Pharisees, they were separatists within, making a party of pride.

- Divisive by nature. The Spirit is the power of unity. Those without Him make the separations, then blame the faithful for the split.

- Two separations. God rejects the separation that feels superior. He delights in the separation that is to Him, out of love and devotion.

Jude 1:20 · Darby

But *ye*, beloved, building yourselves up on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Spirit,

Jude has been describing ungodly men inside the Christian company. Now he turns to the believers themselves and calls them "beloved." This verse gives them two things to do: a building work and a praying life.

Written to the Saints Themselves

Kelly notices who is missing from Jude's wording:

This is very carefully worded. This letter says nothing at all about leaders, or guides, or rulers, or preachers, or teachers either. As far as there were any, they generally have a very bad character... The saints themselves are here exhorted directly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Boyd points to where this faith came from:

"Building up yourselves on your most holy faith." As men depart from it, you be more careful of it. Get your soul better built up in it. It is a most holy faith. It is not the invention of man, and the devil has never had anything to do with it. That faith is from heaven itself.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

"Most Holy Faith": the Thing Believed

Kelly insists "the faith" here does not mean the believing that goes on inside us.

This is the only place in all the New Testament where faith is called our "most holy faith."... It is the thing that we believe, which is the meaning of it here. It is not about praising people, but about what these people receive from God... There is a great difference between faith and "the faith." Here it is "the faith." Faith is a quality of you, and me, and every believer. But that is not the sense here, which is, "the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints," as he says in this very letter.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Built on It, Not in It

Some translations read "on your most holy faith" rather than "in." Ridout hangs the sense of the verse on that small word.

That verse is often misquoted. People say, build up yourself in your most holy faith. They speak as if the faith were something inside us, to be strengthened and built up in. That is not the thought. We are to build ourselves up on that solid, holy foundation — the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. That is the faith. We cannot strengthen that, but we can strengthen ourselves upon that.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Hole adds why nothing can be added to the faith itself:

We have already seen in this letter that God has committed the faith to us as a perfect and completed thing. It needs no building up: we can add nothing to it. It is we who need the building up... We do not have a most holy place today as Israel had long ago. Instead we have a most holy faith. No one may trespass on it or tamper with it.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

How the Building Is Done

The Christian's Friend turns it into a daily question:

Do we go to the word of eternal truth every morning? Do we read it and think it over, depending on the Spirit? Do we pray over it, and take it in as food that renews our inner self?... And we can be sure that those who build themselves up will value what others build into them, and will gain from the ministry God has given those others.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Praying in the Holy Spirit

Hole reads praying "in" the Spirit as the exact opposite of the men Jude has described:

Not "to the Holy Spirit," as though we were to think of Him as an Object of faith outside ourselves. It is "in" Him that we are to pray. Now prayer is the expression of dependence upon God, who is outside ourselves. We are very dependent. We are to know it, and to confess it in practice by praying. In this we shall be the very opposite of the ungodly men whom Jude has described to us. They feel they are enough in themselves.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Kelly is candid that not all prayer qualifies:

There is a great deal of prayer that is not in the Holy Spirit... Where there is prayer in the Holy Spirit, every word of it is fully acceptable to God. Every word of such prayer expresses exactly what God means at that time. But there are prayers that begin in the Spirit and do not end in the Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why This Verse Comes First

Hole explains why fighting comes after building:

Remember that the main burden of this letter is that we should earnestly contend for the faith... Some people love a fight for its own sake. They would rush into conflict for a cause they hardly understand, if they understand it at all... We must first be built up on the faith. Only then does it become the banner we fight under.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Beloved — Jude names no leaders, guides or teachers here. He speaks straight to ordinary believers.

- Foundation — "the faith" is the thing we believe, not our believing. It was delivered once, complete, and the New Testament calls it "most holy" only here.

- Building — we cannot strengthen the foundation. We strengthen ourselves on it, by reading the word daily and taking it in as food.

- Breathing — prayer in the Spirit confesses our dependence. It is the reverse of men who think they are enough in themselves, and much prayer never reaches it.

- Result — build first, then fight. The faith must be our foundation before it becomes our banner.

Jude 1:21 · Darby

keep yourselves in the love of God, awaiting the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.

Jude writes to believers living among much evil, where some fall and others stand. Verse 21 tells them where to stay while that goes on, and what to watch for.

Keeping Yourself in a Love That Never Changes

The love here is God's love to us, not ours to Him. The wording points to a state we are to stay in.

Notice that the word "keep", as often happens in similar exhortations, is in a past tense (the aorist). Its force is that we are to seek to be in that state. Perhaps it also reminds us of our own powerlessness, and of our need of constant grace to be kept there. The love referred to is God's love to us, which never varies and never changes. Jude simply wants us to live in the sense and enjoyment of it. Nothing can separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus. Most Christians know this. It is quite another thing to live with that awareness in our souls.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Not Only His Light, but His Love

Jude names the highest thing a believer could keep himself in. It is also the answer to the evil around us.

"Keep yourselves in the love of God." Could we keep ourselves in anything better? Was there ever anything higher? Love is of God, and we are to keep ourselves in it, instead of being provoked by the evil things around us, instead of yielding because others yield. This must mean great confidence in God, and delight in what God's own nature is — the activity of His nature. Light is the moral character of God's nature; love is the active character of God's nature. Light does not allow any impurity; love goes out to bless others. We are called to keep ourselves not only in the light of God, but in the love of God. We are in the light already; God brought us there as Christians.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Surrounded by It, Then Shaped by It

Staying in that love is not passive. God holds us, and we are to hold on to His love in return.

His love has a firm hold on us, and He will never let us go. But we are also to have a firm hold on it in the quiet places of our hearts. We are to be bathed in it, just like a bucket or some other vessel that has been thrown into the ocean. Then it is in the ocean, and the ocean is in it. So if we keep ourselves in the love of God, the love of God will be in us, giving its beautiful character to our lives.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why Jude Says "Mercy"

Why does Jude say mercy? One writer ties it to what the sight of so much evil makes a believer feel.

In fact, when one sees the fruits of man's heart, one feels that it must be His mercy. His mercy presents us without spot before His face in that day, for eternal life with a God of holiness. No doubt it is His unchangeable faithfulness, but in the presence of so much evil one thinks rather of the mercy. It is mercy that has made the difference between those who fall and those who stand.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Mercy answers our weakness, and it runs the whole length of the road.

I think mercy is brought in here especially because of the great need — the distress, the weakness, everything that tended to cast people down. No, he says, do not be downcast, look for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ. Is it only along the way? No, it is all along the way, to the very end — "that leads to eternal life", the great consummation. This could not be unless they already had eternal life in Christ now.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Crowning Mercy

The believer has tasted this life already. A last mercy brings him into its fullness.

Keeping ourselves in the love of God will lead to "waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life." Mercy upon mercy meets our need at every step of our journey. But the crowning mercy will take us right out of the scene of need. It will take us to meet the Lord in the air, and into the fullness of life in life's eternal home. On earth we may have caught a glimpse of its glory and a taste of its sweetness. In heaven we enter on its fullness.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Kept, not earning. The love here is God's love to us, unchanging; the call is to live in the conscious enjoyment of what already holds us.

- Kept from bitterness. Staying in that love is the answer to being provoked by the evil around us, or to giving way because others give way.

- Kept and changed. Held in that love like a vessel in the ocean, the love then fills us and marks our lives.

- Kept by mercy. When many fall away, mercy is what marks out those who stand — and God gives it all along the road, not only at its end.

- Kept to the end. The mercy waited for is the crowning one: out of the scene of need, into the fullness of a life the believer already has.

Jude 1:22 · Darby

And of some have compassion, making a difference,

Jude has just told his readers to build themselves up, to pray, and to keep themselves in the love of God. Now he turns them outward, toward people caught up in error. Two questions follow: who are the "some," and why must we treat them differently?

A note on wording: the ESV reads "have mercy on those who doubt." The older translation these writers use reads "Of some have compassion, making a difference." Their comments follow that older wording.

Where the compassion comes from

Compassion like this is not something we produce. One writer traces it to its source.

"And of some have compassion." If we are to fulfil that exhortation, compassion must first flow into our hearts, and where does it come from? It does not spring up from false teaching, or from the flesh, or the world. This tender pity that spends its all to bless those in distress and danger is a divine quality. And if our hearts are to be full of it, we must build ourselves up in the faith, pray in the Spirit, and keep ourselves in the love of God. We must be conscious of the eternal and incorruptible riches that are ours in heaven above.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Making a difference

Treating one person differently from another sounds unfair. One writer meets that objection head on.

"Of some have compassion, making a difference; and others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire." Some might say there is partiality, that this is never right; yet God calls upon us to make a difference. But we must take care that we do not make differences in order to please ourselves, but because we believe God would have us do it. Nothing more calls for an exercised conscience than this. Saints very often have a common routine, a rule for dealing with everybody: but this is not God's way. The saints of God must weigh many circumstances, principles, and states of souls in each case that comes before them. There may be hardly two persons who would have to be dealt with alike.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A single fixed rule would be far easier. Another writer notes that ease is precisely why it is not God's way:

It would be much easier, no doubt, to have a rigid rule applicable in all cases, which would remove all exercise of mind as to how things should be dealt with, but such is not God's way.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Who the "some" are

Compassion here does not cover everyone involved in the evil. One writer draws the line between those who spread error and those who fall for it.

One more thing to notice: dealing with such people needs discernment. "Of some," says Jude, "have compassion, making a difference." There may be leaders in the evil, corrupters of the truth. We should keep completely apart from them; they are to be rejected altogether. Others are misled — simple souls whom clever speech has deluded and plausible reasoning has entangled. We are to seek these out and recover them.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Compassion and separation together

Christ Himself is the pattern. One writer sets out what each part of Jude's instruction costs the one who obeys it.

Unbounded compassion for the people of God must always go together with uncompromising separation from the evil that holds them. So it was with Christ. Of Him one has rightly said: "In Christ there is a compassion that knows no limit to the sinner combined with infinite separation from his sin." To show compassion we shall need divine love. To make a difference will call for divine wisdom. To pull any "out of the fire" will need divine power. And to "hate the garment spotted by the flesh" will demand divine holiness.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Going after them, from firm ground

The compassion Jude commands is active. It goes looking, and it keeps looking when people push it away.

"Of some have compassion, making a difference." ... There are poor, feeble Christians who need your help; lame ones, ready to turn out of the way. They have to be sought out, to be cared for. They may sometimes tell you they do not want your care, but we are not to be discouraged. Go after them, seek them. Seek them in the grace of Christ, and the love of Christ.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Reaching in, though, is not the same as climbing in.

It is a fatal mistake to think that we must go into the fire ourselves to pluck people out of it. This would never do... How can I best pull a man out of a swamp? Surely not by going into the swamp, but by standing on firm ground and from there lending him a helping hand.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A disputed text

Commentators differ over the wording itself. One writer explains why he is cautious here:

I find this passage unusually hard to explain, and the reason is this. The original authorities and the best authorities are all in confusion about it. This is very rarely the case in the New Testament, but it is the case here... Now I believe there are three classes, and not two only. That will show how uncertain it is.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. Compassion is a divine quality. It fills the heart that builds up in the faith, prays in the Spirit, and keeps in the love of God.

- Discernment. "Making a difference" rules out one routine for everybody. It calls for an exercised conscience in every case.

- Distinction. Seek out the misled and recover them. Stand apart from those who corrupt the truth.

- Balance. Limitless compassion for the person joins uncompromising separation from the evil. That takes divine love, wisdom, power and holiness at once.

- Position. You cannot pull anyone out of the fire by entering it. Reach from firm ground, and reach again when they refuse.

Jude 1:23 · Darby

but others save with fear, snatching [them] out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jude 1:24 · Darby

But to him that is able to keep you without stumbling, and to set [you] with exultation blameless before his glory,

Jude ends a letter full of warning — false teachers, fallen angels, apostasy, coming judgment — with a burst of praise. The last word is not about what the believer must do, but about what God is able to do: hold the wavering upright now, and set them one day before His own glory without a flaw.

From the Wreck to the Rest

The turn at verse 24 is deliberate. After pages of human corruption, the letter lifts the reader's eyes to Someone else.

When we come to verses 24 and 25, how delightful is the contrast with all that has gone before! We come out from the darkness of human wickedness and apostasy, and even from the struggles and efforts of true saints in the presence of the evil, into the clear light of the power and glory of God. Our eyes are lifted to "Him who is able to keep you from stumbling." Here, and here only, is real rest for the heart.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Earlier the letter told believers to build themselves up, to pray, to keep themselves in the love of God. Those commands do not carry a person home.

We are to contend for the faith, building ourselves up on it, and we are to work to rescue others from defilement and doom, but we can find no rest in ourselves or our efforts. We may have grace to keep ourselves in the love of God, at least in some measure, yet we can only find rest in the fact that He is able to keep us from falling, and to present us faultless before the presence of His glory.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Able to Keep — Every Step

The promise is not a single rescue but a continuous holding. Where the ability lies, and where failure lies, are two different places.

How fitting, when the dangers, the evils, the horrible wickedness of turning away from all Christian grace and truth might have the effect of greatly discouraging a weak soul! No one ought to be discouraged; not one. "Now to Him who is able to keep" clearly refers to every step of the way, and there is power in Him to keep. It is we who fail in dependence. Never does He fail in power to preserve.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Because the power is His and never short, stumbling can never be blamed upward.

It is still true that God is able to keep us from falling, however hot the fiery trial or fierce the temptation. There is no excuse, then, to be offered if we fall; the fault is wholly our own, and it demands unsparing self-judgment.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Word "Faultless"

This is not a mild word. It is the word Scripture uses of Christ's own offering.

The word "faultless" is the same one used of the Lord Himself when it says He "offered himself without blemish to God" (Hebrews 9:14). Such will be the perfected condition of the saints; and it must be so, since otherwise they could not stand before the presence of the glory of God.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

That condition is not reached by improvement here. It arrives when the body is redeemed too.

That will only be because we are glorified; that will only be because we are like Him. He was the only One intrinsically faultless, and He is the One who, by redemption — and then by its completion for the body, since redemption now concerns only the soul, but when He comes it will be for the body as well — will present us faultless in both soul and body.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Whose Exceeding Joy?

Commentators differ on whose joy the verse names. One reads it as God's joy overflowing beyond even ours.

He is their only Resource, sufficient in this way for the present; and as to the future, He will present every believer without blemish before the presence of His glory. What wonderful power and grace, so far above the vanities of religious pretence! And it will be "with exceeding joy" — that is, His joy will exceed. Ours will certainly be unspeakable and full of glory, but His will exceed ours.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another names that joy as the Father's, and traces it to the same source as the welcome of a son who was lost.

Whose joy is that? Not simply our own — that "exceeding joy," though we share in it and it is reflected in us. The "exceeding joy" is the joy of the Father who has got back the lost, now found, the one dead, now alive again, and He makes the whole house ring with the music that is in His own heart first.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Two Endings, One Doxology

The letter closes by setting the end of the corrupters beside the end of the faithful.

"I see the corruption that has come in, I see the rising tide of evil, I see that the saints may fail in 'building,' and 'praying,' and 'keeping themselves'; but I see there is One in the glory who is able to keep them from stumbling, bring them safely home, and present them faultless before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy. I see the judgment day is coming for the ungodly professors — a day of gloom and sorrow; but I see the presentation day is coming for all His saints — a day of glory and exceeding joy."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The certainty of that day is meant to shape today, not only to be awaited.

Can He not do it — a God of limitless power? You might not think it, but the heart believes it, because He has said it. Is it enough to wait for it, until the church is presented faultless? Surely not. We want to walk according to it now.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Able — The verse moves the eye off our own contending and onto God's power; that is the only place a heart finds rest.

- Kept — His power covers every step of the road, so failure is never a shortage in Him but a lapse in our dependence.

- Faultless — The word is the one used of Christ's own spotless offering; nothing less could stand before the glory of God.

- Presented — The flawless condition comes with glorification, soul and body, when He comes — not by gradual self-improvement now.

- Joy — Commentators read the exceeding joy as God's own, overflowing beyond ours; and a coming day that certain should govern how we walk today.

Jude 1:25 · Darby

to the only God our Saviour, through Jesus Christ our Lord, [be] glory, majesty, might, and authority, from before the whole age, and now, and to all the ages. Amen.

Jude spends his whole letter exposing corruption among the people of God, and then he stops describing and starts praising. This last verse names the One who receives the praise, the way it reaches Him, and how long it lasts.

Praise rising out of ruin

This closing burst of praise is not a change of subject. Jude has looked at the evil until he has seen all of it, and now God alone fills his view.

Jude has exposed the evil in all its horror. He has warned, encouraged, and urged on the believers. But his final resource is God Himself, and all that God is for His people. The size of the evil and the weakness of the believers fade from his view, and God alone remains. So he can close the most solemn letter ever written with the most glorious burst of praise.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"The only God our Saviour"

Jude calls God our Saviour, not Christ our Saviour. The reason lies in who kept these believers through everything the letter has described.

Now Jude adds, "To the only God." Who could have met all this confusion? Who could have planned and provided all this grace and truth? Who could have kept people like us through it all? Remember our total weakness and how exposed we are. Remember the hatred of the enemy, and the contempt of those against us and of all who are drawn away. Remember every pull to go wrong, and worst of all, the hostility that any measure of faithfulness stirs up. Yet He does keep us through it all. It is "the only God our Saviour", not only Christ our Saviour. Christ is the One who accomplishes it all, but here Jude looks at God as the source, and that takes nothing away from Christ. It was the delight of Christ on earth to present God as a Saviour God, and not merely that He Himself was that personal Saviour, the Son of man.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Honour returned to the One men throw off

The letter has described people who throw off God's authority. The closing words hand back to Him exactly what they refuse Him. Older translations read "power" where the ESV reads "authority".

Who is able to keep us?… Here it is the only God, our Saviour. Why does he give these great things to God? Because there are those who deny the only Lord God and our Saviour, Jesus Christ. The apostle gives glory and majesty, dominion and power to the One whom man throws off.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

A word that slipped in from Romans

Older English Bibles read "the only wise God" here. One commentator explains where that extra word came from.

"To the only [wise] God." The word "wise" has crept in here. In all the correct texts the word "wise" drops out in this place. It is right in Romans 16:27… I suppose it was that verse that led the ignorant monk, or whoever was copying Jude, to "correct" it, as he thought. But we cannot correct it. All these human corrections are innovations, and our aim is to get back to what God wrote and what God gave.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Glory that runs the length of time

Jude does not stop at "now and ever". His praise reaches back before time began and on into every age to come.

It is very interesting to notice how fitting Jude's closing words are… He looks at the full extent of eternity. This is much more precise than the wording of the Authorised Version, and it follows the reading of the best authorities.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

All events, from the beginning on into the future, are clearly in His hands. Through them all He stays the same… This is His true glory. He does not get it from anything else. It shines out of Himself, the shining out of what He is, for the full blessing of eternity, whatever the ages still to come may discover of Him in their turn.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Learning the song early

Believers will sing this praise in glory. They get the words now, while the fight is still on.

Their joy will surely find its voice in this song of praise, which was given to them while they were still down here in the stress of the conflict… So the songs of heaven can be learned on earth. God is above all time and He never changes, so His praise is eternal.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Only — Jude finishes his survey of the evil, and God alone is left in view. That is why the most solemn letter in the Bible ends in the brightest praise.

- Saviour — Jude names God as the source of salvation and Christ as the One who accomplishes it. Calling God our Saviour takes nothing away from Christ.

- Through — the praise reaches God through Jesus Christ our Lord, and it hands back the honour that the men in this letter throw off.

- Wise — the best manuscripts leave "wise" out of Jude. The word belongs in Romans 16:27, and a copyist carried it over from there.

- Forever — the glory covers all time: before it began, now, and every age to come. God does not gain it; it shines out of what He is. And the song can be learned down here, in the middle of the fight.