Israel hath sinned, and they have also transgressed my covenant which I commanded them, and they have even taken of the accursed thing, and have also stolen, and dissembled also, and they have put it among their stuff.
God answers Joshua's cry about the defeat at Ai by naming the cause, and the cause is not the enemy but the camp itself. One man buried treasure under his tent, yet God charges a whole nation.
The verse never names Achan. God's words fix the offence on the plural "they."
The whole congregation is held responsible for the evil. "A little leaven leavens the whole lump." Unbelief may ask how all are involved in the sin of one. But the Word of God settles the question — "Israel has sinned" — "they have taken" — "they have stolen" — "they have lied." The assembly was one: one in privilege, one in responsibility. As such, the sin of one was the sin of all, and all were called to clear themselves thoroughly by putting away the accursed thing from among them.
(Older translations read "the accursed thing" where the ESV has "the devoted things.")
If God charged only the doer, no one else would have a stake in dealing with the wrong.
Can we not see the wisdom of God in holding those associated with evil as responsible as the ones who do it? What guarantee would there be that evil would ever be judged? The whole company of Christians would be defiled by the presence of unjudged sin, because of the false tenderness or indifference of some.
This shared accountability was new. It came with the blessing God had just given them.
But notice, it is not Achan, it is not only the wrongdoer, but Israel. There was no such identification before the crossing of the Jordan. The principle of an evil thing affecting the camp was always true, but now it is made far more precise and definite. The greater the blessing of God to His people, the greater their responsibility.
The theft itself was small. The verse puts the weight on a broken covenant.
Where was the enormity of this sin? Achan had disobeyed God and broken His express covenant. The command was that all the perishable goods in Jericho should be burned with fire, and the silver and the gold devoted to Him in His treasury. But Achan disregarded this command. No doubt there was a vast amount of valuable treasure in Jericho, and Achan took only a small fraction of the whole. But this act of disobedience happened at the conquest of the very first of the many cities of Canaan. And it was the act of a responsible man in Israel. All must now learn how serious it is to ignore the word of Jehovah their Saviour, and that the sin of one man may leaven a community.
The charge comes in stages: he took, he stole, he lied, he hid the goods among his own things. That last step, the hiding, shows up again in the early days of the church.
In the early days of Israel's history in Canaan, as in the early days of Christianity, we find God quick to judge evil among His people. He brought the secret sins of those who seemed to be for Him out into the light. Ananias and Sapphira, like Achan, "lied." But God is not deceived. It is for us to open our eyes to our own actions, and to seek to see ourselves as God sees us... Our secret sins are all bare in the light of His face. "All are naked and exposed to the eyes of Him to whom we must give account." Lying will sooner or later be shouted from the housetops.
Defeat did not mean God had failed His people. His own holiness required it.
There were other elements in that glory besides power. There was holiness. That holiness made it impossible for Him to give the approval of His presence where evil went unjudged... The same grace that had given them victory at Jericho would have given it at Ai, if things had been right. But they were not right, and so defeat, not victory, was the order of the day. How could there be victory with an accursed thing in the camp? Impossible! Israel must judge the evil, or Jehovah must judge Israel.
The man who caused the trouble already knew where it was.
When Israel turned their backs at Ai, Achan was not expected to search the tents of his brothers for the cause. It was under his feet in his own tent, where he himself had put it. Depend upon it, the cause of the blight on the gatherings of believers at home and abroad is locked up in your heart and mine. There can be no revival of vitality and power until secret sins are brought to the light and judged individually before the Lord.
- Hidden. One man hid the loot under his tent, and no one else knew — yet God named the offence Israel's.
- Shared. The people were one in privilege and in responsibility. So the sin of one was the sin of all, and all had to clear it out.
- Weighed. The weight lay not in the price of the goods, but in a broken covenant at the very first city.
- Blocked. God's holiness would not back unjudged evil. The grace that took Jericho withheld victory at Ai.
- Searched. The remedy starts under your own floor, not in your neighbour's tent — secret sin brought to light before God.
And the children of Israel shall not be able to stand before their enemies they shall turn their backs before their enemies, for they have made themselves accursed. I will no more be with you, except ye destroy the accursed thing from your midst.
God's answer to Joshua's grief is not comfort but diagnosis. The defeat at Ai has a cause, and the cause is inside the camp. One man's theft brought down a whole army and cost Israel the presence of God. The verse ends with the one condition that would bring that presence back. (Older translations call these "the accursed thing," and the writers quoted below use that older wording.)
Only Achan took the plunder, yet the whole nation cannot stand. One writer traces this to what made Israel one body — God living among them:
The whole assembly was involved in the evil. How was this? The divine presence gave a unity to the whole assembly; it bound them all together in such a way that all were involved in the sin of the one. It was one assembly, and so it was impossible for anyone to take independent ground. The sin of each was the sin of all, because God was in their midst, and He could not countenance unjudged evil. The congregation had to clear itself of the evil before the Lord could lead it to victory. Had He allowed them to triumph at Ai, it would have argued that He was indifferent to the sin of His people.
The obvious objection is that nobody else knew. Another writer answers it, and carries the principle on to the church:
The people might have said: Does that concern us? How could we have known about a hidden thing, and not having known it, how are we responsible? To all that we reply that God always has the unity of His people before His eyes. He sees each person as part of one whole, responsible for the others. The suffering and sin of one is the suffering and sin of all. If that is true of Israel, how much more of us, the church of God — one body united by the Holy Spirit to the Head in heaven.
The thing that defeated an army began as a look. One commentator walks through Achan's own account of it:
He had followed his natural inclinations; he began where we all begin, where the first man began. "I saw." His eyes were the way into his heart, but there was no sentinel to watch. It is through the eyes that the accursed thing takes possession of the heart and provokes it to lust: "I coveted them." "Then when lust has conceived, it brings forth sin": "I took them." The fine Babylonian garment could feed the pride of life. The silver and gold could satisfy every craving. They became Achan's prey — or rather, they made him their prey.
"I will be with you no more" is not God abandoning a weak people:
If the Lord is present to give victory over His enemies, He is also present to discipline His people. "Israel has sinned!" God does not say, One man has sinned — find him out. No; it is the six hundred thousand of Israel, because Israel is one nation. God cannot go on with unjudged evil. Weakness is no hindrance, wickedness is. Can God lend the sanction of His presence to evil? Never! If we are God's dwelling place, we must be holy.
The last clause is the door left open. It ties the outcome of every future battle to one thing:
Yet God also showed a way of escape. In the same verse He goes on to say, "neither will I be with you any more, except you destroy the accursed from among you." The outcome of Israel's battles depended on whether God could be with them, and this could only be so if they removed from among themselves what was cursed. Hidden and unjudged sin is the death knell to spiritual victory.
Notice the direction of the command: Israel is not told to leave, but to clear itself.
Separation from evil is always God's principle of action. If we are on God's ground, we separate by putting away the evil. If we are not on God's ground, we separate by coming out of the evil. Achan's sin brought defilement on Israel, and the Lord said, "I will be with you no more, unless you destroy the devoted things from among you." This is the first kind of separation. Israel was on God's ground, and the true principle was not to go out of Israel, but to put away the evil from it.
The valley where Achan was judged did not stay a byword for shame. Later prophets reached for it as an encouragement:
Where evil exists, judging it is the only way anyone can enter into the forgiveness and favour of God. So Hosea says that the valley of Achan (Achor) shall be a "door of hope," and she (Israel) shall sing there. And Isaiah says, "The valley of Achor shall be a place for the herds to lie down in." Hope shines nowhere so brightly as on the spot where sin has been judged. No place gives a sinner rest like the foot of the cross.
- Presence unites. God dwelling in the camp made Israel one, so the sin of one became the sin of all — no one could stand on independent ground.
- Presence exposes. God is present to give victory over His enemies, and present to discipline His people; His nearness both wins battles and finds sin.
- Presence withholds. Defeat at Ai was not weakness but wickedness. A victory with Achan in the camp would have said God is indifferent to evil.
- Presence stays on one condition. "Unless you destroy the devoted things" — Israel must clear the evil out from within, not walk away from it.
- Presence turns Achor into hope. Judge the sin, and blessing begins; the valley of Achan became a door of hope.
Rise up, hallow the people, and say, Hallow yourselves for to-morrow; for thus saith Jehovah the God of Israel, There is an accursed thing in the midst of thee, Israel thou shalt not be able to stand before thine enemies, until ye take away the accursed thing from your midst.
Israel has just been beaten at Ai, and God's answer points away from the enemy and back into Israel's own camp. It raises the questions that shape the chapter: how one man's sin makes a whole nation guilty, what "consecrate yourselves" asks, and why God links His presence to removing the devoted things.
The theft was one man's, yet God speaks to the whole nation. Commentators explain why.
The whole assembly was involved in the evil. How was this? The presence of God gave a unity to the whole assembly; it bound them all together in such a way that all were involved in the sin of the one. It was one assembly, and so it was impossible for anyone to take independent ground. The sin of each was the sin of all, because God was in their midst, and He could not tolerate unjudged evil. The evil involved the whole congregation, and they had to clear themselves of it before the LORD could lead them on to victory. If He had let them win at Ai, it would have meant He was indifferent to the sin of His people.
Most Christians today miss this side of things.
But most of God's people do not understand the corporate side. Sadly, they go through the world without troubling themselves about their fellow Christians. Corporate responsibility is unknown to them.
God names the reason for the defeat: not weak troops, but something they kept. One writer draws out what that means for people God has blessed.
The greater God's blessing to His people, the greater their responsibility. God's rich grace deals with all our evil and puts it away. Yet what dishonours Him after He has blessed us like this makes us nothing before the enemy. The worst evil disappears before the power of redemption. But an evil that people would count very small, if cherished or overlooked, later becomes a source of immense weakness in the presence of Satan. Is this a reason for distrust? Not in the least. It is the greatest possible reason for watchfulness and care.
Joshua's first order is not to attack but to set the nation apart. One writer explains what that looked like in practice.
Joshua must consecrate the people. That means separating them from normal daily life to focus on one important matter: a devoted thing was in their midst, and it had to be taken away. We might wonder why God did not deal with this without involving the whole congregation. But everyone had to learn in the open that God is a God of true holiness. Dealing with it in public would impress the seriousness of such sin on every person, and guard against further breaches. The war had to be put on hold, to show that God governs among His own.
Notice the timing in the command.
God said, "Consecrate yourselves for tomorrow." We are called to consecrate ourselves before the moment of action, not at it. Why are we so often unable to judge evil and to act for God? Because we have not consecrated ourselves beforehand. Why is it that so often at the worship meetings our hearts are cold and our lips silent in praise? Because we have not obeyed the word: "Consecrate yourselves for tomorrow."
The word "until" sets a condition. One writer traces what hangs on it.
Yet God also showed a way of escape. In the same verse (7:12) He goes on to say, "I will be with you no more, unless you destroy the devoted things from among you." The outcome of Israel's battles depended on whether God could be with them, and this could only be so if they removed from among themselves what was devoted to destruction. Hidden and unjudged sin is the death knell to spiritual victory.
The guilt spread to everyone, but the punishment would not.
God would make them all feel that they were involved. Yet in His goodness He makes careful provision to bring out the one offender, now that they are truly waiting on God and humbling themselves over it. When they are unwatchful and prayerless, all share in the sorrow. But when His people draw near to God, He traces the sorrow home to the one who is guilty. They clear themselves by the very fact that they all humbled themselves before God.
- Presence. God living in their midst made the camp one; that is why the sin of one was charged to all.
- Weakness. Redemption answers the worst evil. A small evil, kept and unjudged, leaves us weak before the enemy.
- Consecration. Set yourself apart before the day of action, not during it. Cold worship and weak discernment come from skipping this.
- Removal. God's presence, and so victory, waited on one thing: destroying what was devoted. The warning itself held the way out.
- Grace. When the whole people humble themselves, God traces the guilt home to one man and clears the rest.
And ye shall be brought near in the morning according to your tribes; and it shall be, that the tribe which Jehovah taketh shall come forward by families, and the family which Jehovah taketh shall come forward by households; and the household which Jehovah taketh shall come forward man by man.
One hidden theft had already cost Israel a defeat at Ai, and God's answer was not a battle plan but a summons to court. Why did God, who already knew the thief, make the whole nation come forward group by group until the one guilty man stood alone?
Everyone must appear, because God counted one man's theft as the nation's sin. Commentators explain why.
The whole assembly was involved in the evil. How was this? God's presence made the whole assembly one. It bound them together so that the sin of the one involved them all. It was one assembly, and so it was impossible for anyone to take independent ground. The sin of each was the sin of all, because God was in their midst, and He could not tolerate evil that went unjudged. The whole congregation was involved, and had to clear itself of the evil before the Lord could lead it on to victory. If He had let them win at Ai, it would have meant that He did not mind the sin of His people.
Israel had just lost a battle, so the trouble looked military. Commentators put the problem elsewhere.
Suppose the accursed thing gets in among the people who bear witness for God. Then our task is to sanctify ourselves and put the evil away from among us. It is not a question here of power, but of holiness and of obedience... To sanctify oneself is to separate oneself from all evil to God. It is impossible without holiness to have God with us.
The verse says the LORD takes the tribe, though men do the bringing forward. How? One writer answers from the way Israel made other choices.
By referring to Joshua 7:14-18 you will see how the lot was used to discern the mind of the LORD among His people. Though not stated in so many words, this would be the way the discovery was made. Strikingly, we find this way of choosing first used by the LORD in Leviticus 16:8. It was the divine way of making a selection between the two goats. Numbers 26:55, Joshua 13:6 and many other places show this to be the meaning.
Handing the search to God was a mercy to the innocent. The many were suffering for what one man had done.
God would make them all feel that they were involved. Yet in His own goodness He carefully provided that the guilty man himself should be brought out, now that they are waiting on God and humbling themselves because of it. So when they are unwatchful and prayerless, all share the sorrow. But when His people draw near to God, the sorrow is traced home to the one who is guilty. They clear themselves by all humbling themselves before God. This act shows that they are not willingly tolerating evil, so God takes the matter into His own hands and the offender is soon brought out.
God could have named Achan in a sentence. Instead the circle tightens from tribe, to clan, to household, to one man.
The Lord could have exposed Achan as the offender at once. Instead, in His great wisdom, He made all the tribes come as though all were under suspicion. This would call for serious heart searching among all, so that they would not merely resent Achan but would all be humbled by the evil.
A thief might reason that no one would ever find one tent among thousands. God's presence in the camp cut both ways.
The sinner might try to tell himself that discovery was impossible. He might cling to the hope of escaping among the many thousands of Israel. Miserable delusion! He might be sure his sin would find him out. The same presence that secured blessing for each person was just as faithful in exposing the most secret individual sin.
A whole night lay between the command and the search. Each narrowing step gave Achan a fresh chance to speak first.
The night passed, and Achan did not confess his sin... Surely he knows that discovery is near, that the lot will fall on him. "Achan, why not even now confess your sin? Why not own before the Lord that you have broken His command, and that the stolen goods are in your tent?" But his heart was hard. He had resisted the first whispers of his conscience, and now he would not listen to its shouts.
- One — one man's theft became the nation's sin. God's presence bound the camp into one body, and that body could not shelter unjudged evil.
- All — so God summoned all. Every tribe came forward as if under suspicion, and the manhunt became a search of every conscience.
- Narrowed — tribe, clan, household, man. God took the matter into His own hands, so the search cleared the innocent and found the guilty.
- Missed — Achan had a night and four public steps in which to speak. He silenced his conscience each time, until exposure replaced confession.
- Restored — the issue was never firepower but holiness. Israel could not face its enemies until it put the evil away.
And it shall be, that he who is taken with the accursed thing shall be burned with fire, he and all that he hath, because he hath transgressed the covenant of Jehovah, and because he hath wrought wickedness in Israel.
In one breath God names the sentence and the reason: fire, a broken covenant, an outrageous act. Why should a hidden theft of silver, gold and a garment count as an attack on the whole nation's standing with God?
What Achan took was small next to the plunder of a whole city. Commentators point elsewhere — to the command he broke and the moment he broke it.
Achan had disobeyed God and broken His express covenant. God commanded Israel to burn all the perishable goods in Jericho with fire, and to devote the silver and the gold to Him in His treasury. Achan ignored that command. No doubt there was a vast amount of valuable treasure in Jericho, and Achan took only a small fraction of the whole. But this disobedience happened at the conquest of the very first of Canaan's many cities. And it was the act of a responsible man in Israel. All must now learn how serious it is to ignore the word of the Lord their Saviour. They must learn too that the sin of one man may spread through a community like leaven.
Readers stumble over the severity long before they stumble over the theft. One writer answers that objection twice. First he points to the relationship Israel stood in with God. Then he points to the first sin and what it cost the world.
And may we not ask the one who objects: how could God approve of evil in His people? How could He go on with it? What should He do with it? He was about to judge the seven nations of Canaan. Could He then be indifferent to sin in His people? Most certainly not. His word is, "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities." He took them into relationship with Himself, and that was the very ground of His dealing with them in holy discipline.
It is the height of folly for man to reason about the severity of divine judgment. It is just as foolish to reason about the seeming mismatch between the sin and the punishment. All such reasoning is false and irreverent. What brought in all the misery, the sorrow, the desolation, the sickness, pain and death? What brought all the untold horrors of the last six thousand years? What was the source of it all? Just the one little act — as man would call it — of eating a bit of fruit? But that little act was that terrible thing called sin — yes, rebellion — against God!
The sentence reaches past the man to his household and his goods. One writer explains why that is not the punishing of children for a father's sin.
His sons and daughters shared this judgment. That shows they knew of his crime and did not report it, for in Israel children were not to be put to death for their father's sins (Deut. 24:16). Achan's animals were also destroyed, however. Israel raised a great heap of stones over the remains, a testimony to God's holiness in judgment.
God could have named Achan at once. Instead He sifted the nation tribe by tribe, family by family, man by man. Commentators see goodness in both the delay and the result.
The Lord could have exposed Achan as the offender at once. But in His great wisdom He made all the tribes come forward as though all were under suspicion. This would call for serious heart searching among them all. Then no one would feel mere resentment against Achan; instead the evil would humble them all.
God would make them all feel that they were involved. Yet in His own goodness He makes careful provision that the one offender should be brought out, now that they are waiting on God and humbling themselves because of it. So when they are unwatchful and do not pray, all share in the sorrow. But when His people draw near to God, the sorrow is traced home to the one who is guilty.
Achan sinned alone, yet the whole nation had to deal with it. One writer places that shared holiness beside personal holiness, and says Christians neglect it.
In Joshua 5 we have individual holiness, and in Joshua 7 corporate. Israel had to put away what had come into the middle of the congregation. Otherwise the nation would be defiled and share in the accursed thing. God's children rarely understand these two sides of practical holiness. Christians more often seek the first — individual holiness — and treat the second as unimportant.
- Covenant — Achan's theft was small in value, but it broke an express command of God. One man's sin can spread through a whole community.
- Relationship — God had taken Israel into relationship with Himself. That is why He would not ignore sin among them, and why the penalty was not out of proportion.
- Household — Achan's family shared the sentence because they knew and said nothing. Israel's law never put children to death for a father's sin.
- Search — the sifting of tribe, family and man humbled everyone before it named one man. All judged themselves instead of resenting Achan.
- Shared holiness — personal purity was not enough. The whole people had to put away the evil that had come among them.