John 7:45–46

John 7:45 · Darby

The officers therefore came to the chief priests and Pharisees, and they said to them, Why have ye not brought him?

The chief priests and Pharisees sent temple police to arrest Jesus, and the men came back empty-handed. This verse is the demand for an explanation — and the men sent to silence Him end up speaking for Him.

Why they sent officers

They had run out of ways to answer Him. Only force was left.

The chief priests in Jerusalem had sent officers to arrest this wonderful Speaker and bring Him from the temple. There He had been boldly stating His mission, where He came from, and who He was. But His statement was so strong, so definite, so clear that they could think of no other way to silence Him than force. They envied His fame and feared Him as a rival. So the officers got their orders.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Who "the officers" were

The word translated "officers" here is not the ordinary word for a household servant or a slave. It carries official weight, and John uses it again in chapters 18 and 19.

Another word is hypēretēs, also translated "servant." Two other words, doulos and diakonos, are translated the same way. Doulos is a slave; diakonos is an ordinary servant, at table and so on; but hypēretēs is more official. The first meaning of the word is a "rower," and so it generally means someone who has a distinct service. We could only translate this word as "servant." Here are the places where it occurs: Matthew 5:25; Mark 14:54; Luke 1:2; 4:20; John 7:32, 45, 46; 18:3, 12, 18, 22, 36; 19:6; Acts 5:22, 26; 13:5; 26:16; 1 Corinthians 4:1.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Face to face with the Speaker

They went meaning to obey. First they stopped to listen.

No wonder the officers were fascinated! They expected a noisy agitator against Rome or some other government. Instead they stood face to face with a speaker so calm, so dignified, so uncompromising and yet so bold. He more than overawed them. They felt powerless to carry out their orders. The superiority of that presence, the majesty of that Person forced them into admiration of Him.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

The question that produced a confession

The demand for an explanation backfired. In front of their masters, the officers had to say what His words had done to them.

There were darker traits, however, in the religious leaders than in the crowd, and this is what the Spirit brings before us next. The officers answered, "Never man so spoke as this man." The Pharisees answered them, "Are you also deceived? Did any one of the rulers believe on Him, or of the Pharisees? But this crowd that does not know the law, they are accursed" (verses 46-49). Here conscience answered to the words of the Lord. It answered in such a way that, in front of their masters, they let slip a confession of the power with which He spoke. But the Pharisees, with unbreakable hardness, throw the officers' weakness back at them, challenge them to name one ruler or Pharisee who believed, and show their contempt for ordinary people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Their confession was not a claim to have understood Him.

They did not understand what He said. But they felt that no mere man ever spoke as He did. His words placed Him in a completely different category. They might be ignorant, but their senses were not entirely deadened.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What the failed arrest set off

One refusal sets the rest of the chapter moving. No hand is laid on Jesus, the Pharisees turn their anger on the people, and Nicodemus, one of the rulers, asks for the law to be kept.

In this Gospel the crowd and the Jewish leaders are always kept apart, and the difference is clear here. His time was not yet come. They send officers to take Him, and these return, struck by what He said, without laying a hand on Him. The Pharisees are angry, and show their contempt for the people. Nicodemus risks a word of justice according to the law, and brings their contempt on himself. But each one goes away to his own home.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Errand. The leaders had no answer left for Him. They envied His fame, so they sent temple police to bring Him in.

- Encounter. The men went meaning to obey. Then they listened, and His presence left them powerless to arrest Him.

- Confession. Asked why they came back empty-handed, they confessed the power in His words.

- Limit. They did not understand what He said, yet they felt His words put Him in a class of His own. Conscience can feel more than the mind grasps.

- Timing. No hand closed on Him. His time had not yet come.

John 7:46 · Darby

The officers answered, Never man spoke thus, as this man [speaks].

The chief priests' guard went out to seize Jesus and came back with nothing but a sentence about how He talked. The men sent to arrest Him ended up as witnesses for Him.

Words that disarmed the arrest

The officers had a simple job and failed at it. The reason they gave was the effect of what they heard.

Picture the scene. The Pharisees and chief priests had sent their officers to arrest our Lord. The officers came back, but empty-handed. When asked why they had not brought Jesus, their excuse was that never man spoke like this Man. His very words so marked Him out as God's Messenger that they became His protection from arrest.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Their excuse was an admission of defeat. A second reason lay behind it, one they knew nothing about.

They admitted that they had been overcome by His words themselves. Those words were "spirit and life." The power in them could not be resisted, and it held them back from carrying out their mission. His hour had not yet come.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

The force of the wording

The wording matters. Their sentence puts the weight on how He spoke. (The writers quoted here use an older translation, which reads, "Never man spoke like this man.")

The officers now returned to their masters, the arrest not carried out. The words of Christ had made an impression. "Never man," they said, "so spoke." For that is how we should read it.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Not like the teachers they knew

These men had heard plenty of religious teaching. They were comparing Jesus with the scribes, the official teachers of the law.

He spoke "not as the scribes." No doubt the scribes were very correct in their talks, and could tell you all about everything. They had literal exactness — that would be most interesting and most intellectual. But while He had that in a way beyond theirs, He had a power that always made the word of God to be the sword of the Spirit. In His hand its connection and its application were perfect. It always suited the occasion. People could resist it, and they did. They rejected both His words and Him. But even so they had to own that "never man spoke like this Man."

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Where such words came from

The officers could describe the effect. They could not say where such power came from, or what refusing it costs.

His words came warm from the heart of the Father. They lost nothing of their grace beyond words, their freshness, their passion, or their life-giving strength on their journey through the lips of Jesus… To reject His words was to reject everlasting life. It is the same with the gospel, for the gospel is the Word of life.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Conscience in the servants, hardness in the masters

The scene turns on the gap between the hired men and the men who hired them. The officers let something slip; their superiors would not.

Here conscience answered to the words of the Lord. At the very least, it drew an unintended confession out of them, in front of their masters, about the power with which He spoke. It was not as the scribes. But the Pharisees are hard beyond breaking. They throw the officers' weakness back at them. They challenge them to name one ruler or one Pharisee who believed. And they show their contempt for the mass of their countrymen.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A witness from the wrong side

These words came from His enemies' own men. That gives them a weight no friendly witness could carry.

The officers whom the Pharisees sent to take Him came back overwhelmed by the grace and power of His words. They declared, "Never man spoke like this man" (John 7:46). When Christ was brought into his judgment hall, Pilate said three times over, "I find no fault in him"… The dying thief said, "This man has done nothing wrong."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent — the leaders sent men to arrest Him. His words alone sent them back empty-handed, for His hour had not yet come.

- Struck — what stopped them was the way He spoke. He was as exact as the scribes, but with a power they never had, and His word always fitted the occasion.

- Sourced — His words came warm from the Father's heart, losing nothing on the way through His lips.

- Refused — those same words touched the officers' conscience. In the rulers they met hardness, and the rulers answered with contempt for their own men and for the crowd.

- Verdict — the confession comes from the other side. It stands beside Pilate's "I find no fault in him" and the dying thief's "This man has done nothing wrong."