John 4:4–42

John 4:4 · Darby

And he must needs pass through Samaria.

Between Judea and Galilee, John records one word about the route — a "must." Was it simply the shortest road? Or was something else drawing Him to a well in Samaria?

Two necessities on one road

The plain reading is a matter of maps: Samaria lay between Judea and Galilee. But the road also brought Him to one particular town. Commentators read a second reason behind the first.

The direct route to Galilee ran through the district of Samaria, so He "had to go" that way. That was a matter of geography. But there was also a necessity tied to the grace of God. It set Him on a road that brought Him to one particular city of Samaria, called Sychar.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Others push further. The shortest road was not the only road open to a Jewish traveller.

Why did He have to pass through Samaria? It is true that the direct route to Galilee ran through Samaria. But strict Jews took other routes, to avoid a people they despised. So the need was not a question of roads and countries. May we not say instead that the need was in the heart of God? Before the world was made, God had purposed blessing for a poor sinful woman in Samaria. To win that soul and gladden the heart of God, Jesus had to go through Samaria.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. One writer takes the necessity as practical, while still allowing God's purpose behind it:

The "must" in chapter 4:4 is a practical one. The straight way was through Samaria, and the Jews usually went that way, though they did not stop in Samaria as they passed. I would not say He went on purpose to meet this woman — though it was God's purpose that He should.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Pushed out of Judea, and grace overflows

He did not leave Judea by choice. The same writer who calls the necessity practical still sees the move as an opening for something larger.

Now, in John 4, Jesus is driven away by the jealousy of the Jews. He begins His ministry outside that people, while still recognising their true place in God's dealings. He goes away into Galilee, but His road led Him past Samaria... Being weary, He sits down outside the town at the edge of the well — for He had to go that way. But this necessity gave occasion for the working of that divine grace which was in the fullness of His Person, and which overflowed the narrow limits of Judaism.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Rejection in one place did not shut down His work; it redirected it.

He went towards Galilee, and had to go through Samaria. There He met the woman and brought blessing to her soul, and that brought blessing to many others too. If some reject His grace, their unbelief does not dry up the channel — it diverts it, and others get it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Standing where a Jew would not stand

Samaria was not neutral ground. Jews kept apart from Samaritans. One writer argues they were right to do so, which makes the Lord's place on that road all the more striking.

The Jews were acting in consistent righteousness when they refused all dealings with the Samaritans... They were to be God's witnesses against the world. They were the clean, kept separate from the unclean, as a testimony to the righteousness of God against a corrupted earth. But Jesus was now standing apart from Israel. He had left Judea, the place of righteousness, and stood in defiled Samaria as Son of God, the Saviour of sinners. He had already gone to Judea looking for righteousness, the proper fruit of that country, and had not found it. He is not going to look for it in Samaria either. Here He must act in another way altogether — in the way of grace only.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Love with its own compulsion

At the well two tired people meet. One writer sets their contrast side by side.

She too was weary, as her words soon show. She was alone, as He was alone — but that only makes the contrast greater. She was in the sin that leaves a person isolated, shamed and condemned; He was in the unique glory of His Person and of His search... They were at opposite extremes, on opposite paths, and yet they met. It was not by her will or her planning, and she did not know what lay ahead of her. On His side it was the love that carried its own necessity: "He had to pass through Samaria."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Must (1). On the surface the word is geography: the straight road from Judea to Galilee ran through Samaria.

- Must (2). Writers see a second necessity too: grace steering Him to one town, one well, one woman. Commentators differ on how far to press this.

- Must, not merit. Samaria was the place Jews avoided. He came there not to look for righteousness, but "in the way of grace only."

- Must, redirected. Jealousy in Judea pushed Him out. Unbelief did not dry up the stream of blessing; it diverted it, and others received it.

- Must, and met. She came for water by her own will; He came by love's own necessity — and their opposite paths crossed at the well outside Sychar.

John 4:5 · Darby

He comes therefore to a city of Samaria called Sychar, near to the land which Jacob gave to his son Joseph.

Jesus leaves Judea for Galilee, and the road takes Him into Samaria, a country the Jews avoided. The verse reads like a travel note, yet the route, the town and the field once given to Joseph each carry weight.

A Road Chosen by Grace

The map explains part of the journey, but not the stop.

The direct route to Galilee lay through the district of Samaria, so geography alone meant He "had to pass through". But there was a second necessity too, one connected with the grace of God. It set Him on a road that brought Him to one particular city of Samaria, called Sychar.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Town and the Well

The town lay near Shechem, and one feature of it has outlasted everything around it.

He reached Sychar, now Askar, about a mile east of Shechem, which is now called Nablus. Close to that city was Jacob's well, and through all the country's changes it has remained to this day. Generations may come and go, dynasties rise and fall, but wells remain from generation to generation. Springs are plentiful in that district by Shechem, yet Jacob dug his own well. That would make him independent of the usual water supply in the country. It may also have marked out his ownership of that piece of land.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

What Jacob Actually Gave His Son

The field was bought land, and it ended up being Joseph's burial place. One writer draws out the irony of the setting.

We find the Lord now at Sychar, a name that means "purchased". The town took its name from the piece of land Jacob bought from the sons of Hamor and gave to Joseph, who was buried there. So all that Jacob had bought — though he meant it otherwise — and all that he could give to his best-loved son, was a grave. It was a good place to speak of another gift and another purchase, free to all who wanted it and looked for it: a spring of life instead of a place of death. Jacob's spring could be both a picture of that new spring and — as every picture must be — an instructive contrast to it.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

That grave points forward:

Joshua 24:32 speaks of the piece of ground in verse 5. It was Joseph's burial place, and his father Jacob had bought it. Joseph's death is a picture of the death of the Lord Jesus, and that death is the very basis for giving the water of life to guilty sinners.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The True Joseph

Why does this verse name Joseph? One writer traces the answer back to Genesis 49.

Joseph is a well-known picture of Christ… Take, for example, John 4:6. Why does it say that "Jacob's well was there"? Surely to catch our attention in some special way; and Genesis 49:22 uncovers the secret. Joseph, we read, is a fruitful bough, a fruitful bough by a well, whose branches run over the wall. So in this tired Man, who sat by the well of Sychar in the noonday heat, we see the true Joseph. Even while we look at Him, we see His branches running over the wall of Judaism, reaching this poor woman of Samaria with their good fruit.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Why "A City of Samaria" Was a Scandal

The people living around Jacob's field were not simply foreigners; they were the product of a mixed settlement recorded in 2 Kings.

The Samaritans of the Lord's day were rightly seen as a corrupt race. 2 Kings 17:24-41 records the beginning of their history. After Assyria carried away the ten tribes, its king resettled the land with men from Babylon and other pagan cities… The result was a corrupt people who "feared the LORD but also served their own gods". So they had some dim knowledge of the Lord, and of the Messiah who was coming.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Standing in Samaria on New Ground

The Jews had a real reason for keeping clear of Samaritans. That is what makes the Lord's presence in this town so striking.

When the Jews refused all dealings with the Samaritans, they were acting in keeping with righteousness… They were to be God's witnesses against the world… But Jesus was now standing apart from Israel. He had left Judea, the place of righteousness. He stood in defiled Samaria as Son of God, the Saviour of sinners. He had already gone to Judea looking for righteousness, the proper fruit of that country, but had not found it. He is not now to look for it in Samaria. Here He must be in another way altogether, in the way of grace only.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Necessity — Samaria was the direct road to Galilee. The stop at Sychar met a second necessity, one belonging to the grace of God.

- Purchase — Sychar means "purchased". Jacob bought this ground, and it became the grave of his best-loved son.

- Grave — All that Jacob's purchase could give his son in the end was a grave. That is the fitting place to speak of a free gift and a spring of life.

- Branches — Genesis 49 calls Joseph a fruitful bough by a well, with branches running over the wall. At this well the true Joseph reaches past Judaism to a Samaritan woman.

- Grace — Judea was the place of righteousness, and it produced none. In Samaria the Lord stands on wholly different ground, as Saviour of sinners.

John 4:6 · Darby

Now a fountain of Jacob's was there; Jesus therefore, being wearied with the way he had come, sat just as he was at the fountain. It was about the sixth hour.

Jesus stops at Jacob's well in Samaria and sits down, worn out from the road. Two questions follow: what does His weariness say about who He is, and why does John note the hour?

Weariness shows He was truly Man

The detail is not about travel. The One who made the world felt the world's tiredness in His own body.

The everlasting God, the LORD, the Creator of the ends of the earth, never faints and never grows weary. Yet here He is a Stranger in the land, wearied with His journey. The One who made every drop of water in the universe is Himself a thirsty Man in the world His hands had made. In heavenly glory, angelic hosts had always surrounded Him. On earth He appears as a lonely Man.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Just as He was

Older translations say He "sat thus" at the well. That small word has drawn careful attention.

Houtōs, "thus" — that is, just as He was (compare Mark 4:36). The "wearied," as Zahn says, emphasises His humanity.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Weary in body, unwearied in love

His body had reached its limit. His love had not.

He sat just as He was — on the well, wearied, thirsty, hungry. How truly Man He was! In His spirit He felt the hatred and rejection of the Jews with perfect sensitivity. In His body He felt the hardships of life too — the heat of the midday sun, the roughness and the length of the way, the pangs of hunger and thirst. And yet He was God, the giver of living water. He was wearied in body but unwearied in His love. At that well side He found both rest and food in doing the will of Him who sent Him.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

The Maker asking a creature for a drink

Sitting on the well, the Maker of the world had no way to reach the water Himself.

He was weary with His journey and sat alone in the world — what an astonishing place! This was the world He had created. More than that, it was the world He had come into in love. And here He is only a weary Man, feeling the rejection of His love. In the place He had taken, He depended for a drink of water on this poor sin-wearied woman — He who had made the water. Grace is in the humbled and obedient Man — that is where what God is shines out.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

About the sixth hour

Commentators differ on the clock here. Some read it as midday, and find in that heat the reason a woman would come to draw water alone.

It is the sixth hour — twelve o'clock. The sun, at its height, was pouring its burning rays on the ground. That is the moment the Lord chooses to pass that way, to meet that soul. The Spirit records the fact. And why? Because that was not the time when women in the East went out to draw water. That was done in the morning, or in the evening, when the heat was not so great (Genesis 24:11). But this woman comes out in the middle of the day... Her sin had isolated her.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Others read the hour as six in the evening, and point to the rest of the chapter.

The time seems to have been six in the evening, for the disciples had gone away into the city to buy food, which might have been for the evening meal. After this the Lord went into the city, and many of the Samaritans believed. They asked Him to stay with them. That was a kindness often shown in the East when the day was far spent.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

Why John names Jacob's well

Why does John mention the well at all? One writer finds the answer in an old picture of Joseph.

Why is it mentioned, "Now Jacob's well was there"? Surely to catch our attention in some special way; and Genesis 49:22 uncovers the secret. Joseph, we read, is a fruitful bough, a fruitful bough by a well, whose branches run over the wall. So in this wearied Man who sat by the well of Sychar, we see the true Joseph. Even while we look at Him, we see His branches running over the wall of Judaism. They reach this poor woman of Samaria with their good fruit.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Weary — and truly Man. Hunger, thirst and tiredness belong to a real human body. The Creator who never grows weary sat down worn out in the world He had made.

- Weary — just as He was. He sat down just as the journey had left Him.

- Weary — yet unwearied. His body gave out; His love did not. Rejected at Jerusalem, He found rest and food in doing His Father's will at a Samaritan well.

- Weary — and therefore asking. Sitting there, He depended on a sinful woman for a drink. Grace shines out through the humbled, obedient Man.

- Weary — and reaching over the wall. At Jacob's well we see the true Joseph. His branches run over the wall to reach a Samaritan woman.

John 4:7 · Darby

A woman comes out of Samaria to draw water. Jesus says to her, Give me to drink

A tired traveller sits by a well in Samaria and speaks first to a woman who has come alone to draw water. His four-word request raises the question of who really needs help here — and who is really giving.

A Man Truly Weary

The Creator sat there depending on His own creation for a drink:

Just think of the Lord Himself. None of the rulers of this world knew Him, yet He was the Lord of glory. He sat there weary on the well, thirsty, depending on this world for a drink of water — the world He Himself made, and it did not know Him! And now He depends on this woman for a drink of water.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

His weariness was not only in His body:

He sat there — just as He was — on the well, weary, thirsty, hungry. How truly Man He was! In His spirit He felt the hatred and rejection of the Jews with perfect sensitivity. In His body He felt the hardships of life too: the heat of the midday sun, the rough and long road, the pangs of hunger and thirst. And yet He was God, the giver of living water. He was wearied in body but unwearied in His love.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Why He Asked at All

He had the power to meet His own thirst another way:

He simply says, "Give me a drink." Why did He ask for a drink of water? The well was deep, and He had nothing to draw with. But could He not have worked a miracle to quench His thirst? For others He works miracles of grace. Yet we never read that He worked a miracle to meet His own needs. There is only one answer. The eternal Son, sent by the Father to be the Saviour of the world, stoops in the greatness of His way to owe a fallen woman a cup of cold water — and so to win the confidence of her lonely heart.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

His request was aimed at something deeper than thirst:

The One who made the heart knows perfectly the way into its affections… God, in the lowliness of a man, asks the Samaritan woman for a favour, a drink of water. But it was to open her heart to her own needs, and to give her eternal life in the power of the Holy Spirit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Woman Who Came

She came out to the well alone. One writer traces that solitude to her sin:

Her sin had cut her off. Her sin drove her into complete loneliness. She avoided the faces and company of people, and went out to be alone — but she walked into the company of God. She avoided the face of man, because she feared his frown and his judgment. But see the grace of Christ: He goes to that place at the very moment He knew He would meet her.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A Request That Crossed a Border

Her answer was surprise, not water. One writer sets it beside Rebekah, a woman asked for a drink at a well long before:

The Lord broke the silence with the simple request, "Give me a drink." Those few words opened the way for everything that followed. Asked by this stranger to meet His need, she answered with surprise… How differently Rebekah had acted, when a stranger asked her for water (Genesis 24:18). But in her day religious argument had not soured people's minds, or made them forget ordinary courtesy.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The Asker Is the Giver

Everything turns on knowing who is asking.

Here is the great truth, and not knowing it ruins the world. People do not know who it is that asks them for a drink… still asking a favour of them. The difference the world does not see is this: it is the Son of God who humbles Himself like this to ask sinners to come. It is the Lord of glory doing it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

His poverty was what made her rich:

He became a poor, needy, lonely man by a well side. That was how He reached a poor fallen woman and brought heaven's best gifts to earth's worst sinners. At the very moment He is enriching us with a fountain of water springing up to eternal life, He Himself has become so poor that He must ask for a drink of water.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Weary — He sat just as He was — hungry, thirsty, tired in body, feeling rejection in His spirit. Yet His love never tired.

- Asking — He worked miracles for others but never for Himself; He chose to owe a fallen woman a cup of water.

- Winning — The One who made the heart knows the way into it; asking her for a favour was how He opened her own need to her.

- Crossing — Grace crossed the border between Jew and Samaritan, into a place where religious argument had killed plain courtesy.

- Giving — The Beggar at the well is the Giver of living water; the world's ruin is not knowing who it is that asks.

John 4:8 · Darby

(for his disciples had gone away into the city that they might buy provisions).

John pauses the conversation at the well to explain why Jesus was alone when the woman arrived. That everyday errand raises real questions about the One who needed food, and about why He wanted to be alone.

Why John Records the Errand

One writer sees the Lord's own choice behind it. Sending the disciples away served two purposes at once:

Weary, hungry and thirsty, He sat at the well side. His power upholds the planets in their tireless courses, and His opened hand satisfies the need of every living thing. Yet He sat there at the well, waiting and alone. He was waiting because at that hour a solitary sinner came to that place, weary, hungry and thirsty in another sense. It was His Father's will that He should meet and bless her there. He was alone because He had sent His disciples away to buy food. That gave them the opportunity of serving Him, and kept them from pushing their unsympathetic presence into the sacred meeting that was to come. Such was His gracious and considerate way with them.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Real Hunger, Real Man

Someone had to buy bread because the Lord needed it. That need shows what kind of body He took:

Birth and growth, eating and drinking, hunger and thirst, weariness and sleep all belong to the human body. They appear here in connection with the body of the Lord. They prove how real the body He took was, and how truly it was marked by all that is characteristic of the human body, sin apart.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The scene has Him both wanting a drink and wanting a meal at the same moment:

Coming to Jacob's well, and being "wearied with His journey", He sat on the well-side. Not only is He weary, but thirsty; for He asks the woman, who at this moment comes to the well, to give Him water to drink. Moreover, since the disciples have gone into the neighbouring city to buy food, the Lord is alone.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Shopping in a Samaritan Town

Jews avoided dealings with Samaritans, yet the disciples went into a Samaritan town to buy food. One writer explains the old rule, and what had changed:

It was quite consistent with righteousness that the Jews refused all dealings with the Samaritans. It was according to their calling to say, "It is unlawful for a Jew to keep company with, or to visit, anyone of another nation;" for this was a testimony against evil, and such testimony was the very trust which Jehovah had committed to Israel... But Jesus was now standing apart from Israel. He had left Judea, the place of righteousness, and was standing in defiled Samaria as Son of God, the Saviour of sinners.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Alone With One Soul

Their absence left the Lord free to deal with one person. One writer sets this meeting beside another one — with Nicodemus, who came to Him at night:

The Lord sat on the well-side about midday, as the time of greatest heat approached. Nicodemus sought Him by night. He sought a Samaritan sinner at midday... Many of us would own that it takes more spiritual skill to deal rightly with an individual than to address a crowd, and makes a bigger demand on our courage.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the hour. Another writer takes the errand itself as the clue:

The time seems to have been six in the evening, for the disciples were gone away into the city to buy food, which might have been for the evening meal.

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

So the woman meets Jesus alone:

He is alone with sinners, settling with them the great interests of their souls, in the grace and power of the Son of God. And blessed it is to see this. It is one of the dearest thoughts to us sinners, that we may be alone with Jesus, and that apostles and churches, or fellow-believers and ordinances, are not needed for this business which is to determine our own personal, individual eternity.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Food They Missed

The disciples left Him hungry. They came back to find Him satisfied already:

The disciples had left Him, in want of rest and drink and food. He had had none. They return to find Him wonderfully refreshed and satisfied, though the sources of it were too deep for them to enter into: "I have food to eat that you do not know about … My food is to do the will of Him who sent me, and to finish His work."

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

Summary

- Errand. The disciples go to buy food. John records this small detail because it explains why Jesus is alone.

- Hunger. The need for that food was real. Hunger, thirst and weariness prove how human the body He took was, sin apart.

- Barrier. Jews kept clear of Samaritans. Yet the disciples buy food in a Samaritan town, while their Master waits there as Saviour of sinners.

- Alone. Their absence leaves room for a private meeting. No apostle, church or ceremony stands between a sinner and Christ.

- Satisfied. They came back with bread and found Him already fed — His food was to do the will of the One who sent Him, and to finish His work.

John 4:9 · Darby

The Samaritan woman therefore says to him, How dost thou, being a Jew, ask to drink of me who am a Samaritan woman? for Jews have no intercourse with Samaritans.

Jesus has asked a Samaritan woman for a drink, and her reply is not an answer but a question: how can a Jew ask anything of her? Her surprise rests on centuries of history and a wall between two peoples.

Who the Samaritans Were

Commentators trace the Samaritans back to the day Assyria emptied the land and refilled it:

The Samaritans of the Lord's day were rightly seen as a corrupt race. 2 Kings 17:24-41 records how they began. After the ten tribes went into captivity, the Assyrian king repopulated the land with men from Babylon and other pagan cities. They lived in the land of the LORD, yet did not fear the LORD, so the LORD troubled them. To deal with this trouble, the Assyrian king sent a priest of the LORD to teach them the ways of the LORD. The result was a corrupt people who "feared the LORD, and served their own gods". So they had some dim knowledge of the Lord, and of the coming Messiah.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A Line God Had Drawn — and Men Abused

God, not human pride, drew the line. He told Israel not to mix with the other nations; the nation then added contempt of its own:

So in reading the Old Testament we cannot miss this: God told His people they were not to mix with other nations. Intermarriage was out of the question. (But this separation was soon abused. Pride entered the heart of that nation, and they began to look down on the Gentiles as dogs. God made the distinction between the Jews and the Gentiles. Looking down on the Gentiles was their own failure, an abuse of God's sovereign grace.)

Modernised from C J DavisOriginal wording

Christ Standing Outside the Line, in Grace

The Jews were right to keep apart; that was their calling. But Jesus had left that ground and stood somewhere else:

The Jews refused all dealings with the Samaritans, and that was fully consistent with righteousness... They were to be God's witnesses against the world. They were the clean kept apart from the unclean, as a testimony to the righteousness of God against a corrupted earth. But Jesus was now standing apart from Israel. He had left Judea, the place of righteousness. He now stood in defiled Samaria as Son of God, the Saviour of sinners... Here He must be in another way altogether, in the way of grace only.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

What She Saw, and What She Missed

How did she know He was a Jew?

"A Jew." She knew He was one by His dress.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

But that was as far as she saw:

All she saw was a weary Jew, and notice how far short of the truth the woman of Samaria comes. What was the truth? The One who had said, "Give me a drink," was the One who made the well and the water in it. He was the Creator Himself. She did not know it. He knew it. Only the grace He could bring could meet and save her, a needy sinner... There are depths of grace in God that promises cannot express.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Closing Comment

Commentators differ on who speaks the last line of the verse:

"For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans." The Revised Version of the Bible treats these words as a parenthesis — that is, as an explanatory comment by the writer of the Gospel. Calvin considered them to be spoken by the woman.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Religious Argument and Plain Kindness

She answers the dispute instead of the request. One writer sets her beside Rebekah, who long before drew water for a stranger at a well:

The stranger asked her to meet His need. She replied with surprise: how could He, a Jew, ask a drink of her, a woman of Samaria? She knew the controversy between the two parties well, and referred to it at once. How different Rebekah's action had been when a stranger asked her for water (Gen. 24:18). But in her day religious argument had not yet soured minds or made people forget ordinary courtesy.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The Wall That Would Come Down

Writers see this meeting as an early sign that the wall would not stand for ever:

In the Gospels, the ministry of the Lord Jesus Himself often gave a preview of the removal of this "wall of partition". Take the woman of Samaria. She could not understand how the Lord, a Jew Himself, could say "Give me a drink" to her, a woman of Samaria, since the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans... Until this "wall of partition" came down, it was "unlawful for a Jew to associate with or visit anyone of another nation" (Acts 10:28).

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Summary

- Wall built. The Samaritans began as a resettled, mixed people who "feared the LORD, and served their own gods".

- Wall God-given. God separated Israel from the nations. The contempt added on top was human pride abusing His grace.

- Wall crossed. Christ left Judea, the place of righteousness, and met her in Samaria in grace only.

- Wall misread. She saw a tired Jew and answered with the old argument. She was speaking to the Creator of the well.

- Wall removed. This meeting points ahead: the barrier that made such contact unlawful would come down.

John 4:10 · Darby

Jesus answered and said to her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that says to thee, Give me to drink, thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.

Jesus sits by a well and asks a local woman for a drink. Then He tells her that if she knew who was asking, she would be the one asking Him. His words name two things she does not know: what God gives, and who is speaking to her.

God Is a Giver

The first half of the verse turns on a word for God's free bounty. One writer sets it against everything people assume about how God deals with them:

God is love, as well as light. Because He is love, He sent His Son to shine in this world, dark as it is through sin. That is not all the love He shows. It is only the beginning of what rises far above every difficulty and need. When it comes to eternal life and redemption, God is not demanding but giving, and giving only. Both are His gift in Christ. The sinner must know Him this way only — not as a receiver but as the Giver. To take any other place would be beneath His majesty. It denies His nature, twists the truth, and leaves no room for love.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Is Speaking

The second half points away from the gift to the Person offering it. One writer draws out the cost of not knowing:

They do not know who it is that asks them for a drink. He is still begging them to be reconciled: "We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God." He is still asking them, in the gentlest and most loving terms, to give themselves to Him. He is still in the place of one asking a favour. The point the world misses is this. The Son of God humbles Himself to ask sinners to come. The Lord of glory is doing it. They do not know who is asking them. So they never ask Him for the gift they must have to enter the kingdom of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Three Things She Did Not Know

That "if" points to what she did not know:

The Lord's reply shows what the woman did not know: her own need, the love of God, and the glory of the One she was standing before. Had she known, she would have asked, and He would have given. She had yet to learn that God is a Giver in love, and that such is her need that she can only be a receiver in grace.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Living Water

The water He offers does not come from that well. One writer links it to a later chapter in John:

By "living water" the Lord indicated the Spirit of God, as is quite clear when we reach chapter 7:39. In the previous chapter God's only Son is His gift to the world. In this chapter the Spirit of God is God's gift to the believer. The Son of God gives that gift, and He was the Speaker seated on the well at Sychar. By the Spirit we have the life within, and by Him the life within springs up to the Source of the life above.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer works from the giver's side:

Christ Himself is the giver here, so "the gift of God" cannot be Himself. He makes no claim on her. Her need is a just claim on His gracious heart. Love and need are face to face in this touching scene, and that is always the point of contact.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

You Would Have Asked

Everything hangs on one small verb:

"You would have asked Him." She had only to speak to that fountain of living water, and the stream would flow into her parched heart. She might speak to Jacob's well forever, and it would do no good; she must toil to draw. You need only speak to this living well, and the waters will flow.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Why, then, does anyone not ask? One writer traces it to pride:

Jesus our Lord alone showed the great, essential truth in all its beauty — "the gift of God." It was new to people in every condition and age. Every soul needs to face it and learn it for itself: God is the Giver, and He will be nothing else to sinful man. Our pride does not like it. Rich or poor, high or low, we want to earn from Him, and we are unwilling to be debtors to nothing but mercy in Christ.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Giver. God meets sinners not as a receiver but as the Giver. Any other place would deny His nature and leave no room for love.

- Given. He gives living water. One writer reads it as the Spirit, whom the Son gives to the believer — life within that springs up to its Source above.

- Unknown. The woman did not know three things: her own need, God's love, and the glory of the Person beside her.

- Unasked. People do not know who is asking them, so they never ask Him. Pride would rather earn than owe everything to mercy.

- Answered. Asking is all it takes. Jacob's well demands hard work; this well answers a single word.

John 4:11 · Darby

The woman says to him, Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep whence then hast thou the living water?

A woman comes to draw water and hears an offer of living water instead. She weighs the offer by what she can see — no bucket, a deep well — and misses the One making it.

Measuring Christ by What He Carries

She tests His words against what she can see. One writer follows her reasoning and names what lies under it:

She understands none of the gracious words she had heard; they were not mixed with faith in her heart. So she reasons against them. If the water was to be drawn from Jacob's well, where was the bucket to let down, for the well was deep? … So the mind argues against the Lord, according to the senses or tradition. That is how fatal ignorance of His Person and of the truth is. Circumstances test faith, and unbelief sinks in them. Unbelief gladly seizes on a great name and its gifts — with or without any right to it — in order to slight a greater name, indeed the greatest of all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why She Cannot Move Past the Rope

Her mind stays on the errand that brought her out. One writer names what she was missing — not a bucket, but the identity of the Man asking her for a drink:

The One who had created the water was there, weary and dependent, so that He might drink it from such a woman — a woman who did not know what she was. … He does not say, "If you knew Me," but, "If you knew who it is that says to you, Give Me to drink." He means the One who has come down so low, getting past all the barriers which kept Him from you. If you knew Him, "you would have asked of Him." … There was the answer: "He would have given you living water." The words seem clear enough. But the poor woman cannot get past the circumstances of her daily work. … she goes no further than her daily toil, though she can see plainly that she is dealing with an extraordinary Person. The Lord was leading her on, and she did not yet know where.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"The Well Is Deep"

Her complaint about the depth describes more than a hole in the ground. One writer hears her whole life in those four words, and finds every person in them:

What a revelation! There are volumes contained in these four words, "The well is deep." They spoke of a weary existence. She was tired of life. Her own will and her sin had left her heart empty. Despised by all, isolated and abandoned, she came at a time when the well was very empty. And is that not what everyone passing through this world finds? "The well is deep." It gets deeper every year he lives. He has to lengthen the rope he uses to draw the water he longs to satisfy his heart with. That gets harder as time goes on, and the Lord tells us why: "Everyone who drinks of this water will be thirsty again."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Answer to "Where Do You Get It?"

She asks where the living water comes from. The answer is not a better bucket but a greater Person:

But what about living water? She understood that to mean running water, not stagnant water. How could that stranger supply it? The well was deep, and He had nothing to draw with. Who was He? Who could He be? … What a story He could have unfolded, had He told her that He had seen Jacob, had wrestled with him, had humbled him, had blessed him! Truly, He was greater than her father Jacob. Jacob dug a well in the ground. He could supply a fountain for the heart.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

No Bucket Needed

Her objection assumes that water takes work. Nobody draws this living water up; you ask for it:

"You would have asked of Him." She had only to speak to that fountain of living water. Then the stream would flow into her parched heart. She might speak forever to Jacob's well, but it would be in vain; she must labour at the drawing. You need only speak to this living well, and the waters will flow.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Summary

- Deep well. Four words describe a whole life. The world's well gets deeper every year, and the rope never reaches what satisfies.

- No bucket. She measures Christ by the equipment He carries. A mind that judges by the senses argues against His words, because it does not know His Person.

- Daily toil. Christ points her to who is speaking with her. She cannot get past the errand that brought her out, though she senses this Man is extraordinary.

- Greater giver. Her question has an answer standing in front of her. Jacob dug a well in the ground; this Man supplies a fountain for the heart.

- Only ask. Jacob's well makes you work the rope. You need only speak to the living well, and the water flows.

John 4:12 · Darby

Art thou greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank of it himself, and his sons, and his cattle?

A woman came to draw water, and Jesus offered her something she could not see. She answered with the one thing she could see: an old well and the ancestor who left it to her. Her question — is this stranger greater than Jacob? — was meant as a defence. It is also the question the whole scene answers.

Unbelief Argues From What It Can See

She has just heard an offer of living water, and instead of asking for it she cross-examines it. One writer traces how her mind moves from the bucket, to the depth of the well, to the name of Jacob:

She understands none of the gracious words she had heard; they were not mixed with faith in her heart. So she reasons against them. If the water was to be drawn from Jacob's well, where was the bucket to let down, for the well was deep? Did He claim to be greater than Jacob? Or was His well better than the one that long ago supplied Jacob and his household — a well which was now theirs? So the mind argues against the Lord, following the senses or tradition. That is how deadly it is not to know His Person and the truth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Tradition As A Place To Hide

Naming Jacob is more than unbelief. It is a retreat to safer ground. The offer was too large to hold, so she reached for something she had inherited:

The woman, however, falls back on tradition — "the well of our father Jacob." Tradition is what human nature in this world always falls back on. It was an effort to escape from something too vast and deep and divine for her to take in.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why A Samaritan Says "Our Father Jacob"

The word "our" carries a whole history. Her claim on Jacob was not personal; it was national, and centuries old:

The Samaritans, though a foreign race, had for centuries taken Jewish ground. They had their temple on Mount Gerizim. They had the Jewish scriptures and spoke of "our father Jacob." They took the Jewish hope as their own — the coming of Messiah (John 4:12, 25).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

So her question is more than a question. She is not just comparing two men. She is putting her ancestry between herself and the offer.

The Detail That Undoes Her Own Argument

She adds that Jacob drank from the well, and his sons, and his livestock. She means it as proof of the well's worth. It is also proof of Jacob's limits:

Her wonder rises, and her eyes are fixed on Him. She would learn from Him: who is He? Greater than her father Jacob, it seems. Yet Jacob himself depended on this one well, and so did his whole household.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The great ancestor was as thirsty as she was.

The One She Was Questioning

The irony is that the Man she measures against Jacob had met Jacob. One writer draws out the story He could have told her, and then sets the two gifts side by side:

Who was she addressing? A proud, self-righteous Jew? A Jew certainly — but One like no one she had ever met. She could never find His equal… What a story He could have unfolded, had He told her that He had seen Jacob, had wrestled with him, had humbled him, had blessed him! Truly, He was greater than her father Jacob. Jacob dug a well in the ground. He could supply a fountain for the heart.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

He Lets Her Discover The Answer

He never says "yes." He does something better — He takes the well she is defending and shows her what it cannot do:

But the Lord does not tell her how much greater than Jacob He is. He knows how to lead her to find this out for herself. He then tells her what she already knew — that though she drank of the water of the well, she would thirst again. From there He goes on to tell her what she had never heard. If she drank of the water He freely gave, she would never thirst again. That water is a well inside the one who receives it, springing up into everlasting life.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Greater questioned. She asks if He outranks Jacob while standing in front of the answer. The mind argues against the Lord from the senses and from tradition.

- Greater hidden. "Our father Jacob" is a refuge, an effort to escape what is too vast and deep and divine to take in.

- Greater claimed. Samaria had taken Jewish ground for centuries. It claimed the temple on Gerizim, the scriptures, the Messiah hope, and the family name.

- Greater exposed. Her own evidence sinks her case — Jacob and his whole household depended on that one well.

- Greater proved. Jacob dug a well in the ground. He supplies a fountain for the heart. Instead of arguing, He lets her taste the difference.

John 4:13 · Darby

Jesus answered and said to her, Every one who drinks of this water shall thirst again;

The woman asked Jesus about drawing water. He turns her question into a verdict on every source of refreshment she has ever tried. His answer sorts all drinking into two kinds: the kind you must come back to, and the kind you never have to come back to.

The nature of an earthly spring

The point is not that the well water was bad. It was good water. The problem lies in what any created supply can and cannot do.

The water of an earthly spring, however good, like every natural blessing, lasts only for the moment. It quenches thirst, only for the thirst to return soon and again and again. That is the nature of all things seen and temporary. The soul, immortal as it is, needs more to satisfy, and God delights in giving when we look to Him in felt need.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "this water" stands for

Jesus points to a real well, but He means more than water. Writers read this water as a picture of everything people reach for to fill the heart.

The water of the well, like all earthly joys, of which it is the symbol, can never satisfy. There is no source of lasting satisfaction in earthly things. Money, pleasure, ambition, duties and earthly relationships, if pursued, may provide a moment's distraction or a passing gratification. But they give no lasting satisfaction. "Everyone who does not know Christ has either a disappointed heart, or a heart seeking what will disappoint it" (J.N.D.).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"The well is deep"

The woman had just said the well was deep. One writer reads that complaint as a picture of ordinary life.

There are volumes contained in these four words, "The well is deep." They spoke of a weary existence. She was tired of life. Her will and her sin had left her heart empty. Despised by all, isolated, and abandoned, she came at a time when the well was very empty. And is this not exactly what every person passing through this world finds? "The well is deep," and it gets deeper every year he lives. He has to lengthen the rope by which he tries to draw the water he would gladly satisfy his heart with. That becomes more difficult as time goes on, and the Lord tells us the reason.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Starting from what she already knew

Notice how He teaches. She has just asked whether He is greater than Jacob. He does not answer by claiming a title. He starts with something she already knew.

But the Lord does not tell her how much greater than Jacob He is: He knows how to lead her to find this out for herself. He then tells her what she herself knew: though she drank of the water of the well, she would thirst again. From this He goes on to tell her what she had never heard.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

A warning aimed at believers too

One writer turns this word on Christians themselves.

On every fountain — broken cisterns, are they not? — of man's digging we may write these words. No matter where man turns for refreshment, he fails to find what can truly quench thirst; pleasure, reputation, power, wealth — whatever the heart of man craves — can never satisfy. As in the book of Ecclesiastes, those who worked hardest to draw water out of these wells had to confess "vanity of vanities." Let us as Christians take note of this and refuse what does not satisfy even the world.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where the offer was heading

She asked for the water, thinking only of saving herself the daily walk. What He said next shows what He was after.

Relief from daily toil was all that she thought of... But He knew her need. He wanted to give her what she really wanted, not what she asked for, so He replied at once, "Go, call your husband, and come here." Conscience must be dealt with before spiritual blessing comes. How wisely, how graciously, He did that!

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Thirst again — the well water was good, but it could not last. Everything seen and temporary quenches thirst only for the thirst to return.

- Thirst again everywhere — money, pleasure, ambition, power, duties, relationships. They all fall under the same verdict.

- Thirst again, deeper — every year he must lengthen the rope. Drawing on this world gets harder as life goes on, not easier.

- Thirst again, and Christians too — write these words over every well of man's digging. Refuse what does not satisfy even the world.

- Thirst no more — He starts with the thirst she already knew. Then He names the gift she had never heard of, and touches her conscience, the place He must deal with before blessing comes.

John 4:14 · Darby

but whosoever drinks of the water which I shall give him shall never thirst for ever, but the water which I shall give him shall become in him a fountain of water, springing up into eternal life.

Jesus meets a Samaritan woman at Jacob's well. She came for ordinary water, and He offers her a gift that ends thirst for good and becomes a spring inside her.

The Well That Never Satisfies

The woman had told Jesus the well was deep. One writer hears in her words the story of every life spent drawing from the world:

There are volumes contained in these four words, "The well is deep." They spoke of a weary existence. She was tired of life. Her will and her sin had only left her heart empty. Despised by all, isolated and abandoned, she came at a time when the well was very empty. And is that not what every man finds as he passes through this world? "The well is deep," and it gets deeper every year he lives. He has to keep lengthening the rope as he tries to draw the water he longs to satisfy his heart with. That becomes harder as time goes on, and the Lord tells us why: "Everyone who drinks of this water will be thirsty again."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A Gift, Not a Payment

The verse turns on the Lord's own promise: I will give. Nothing in the sentence asks for a contribution from the one who drinks.

Mark well what the living water is: the new life in the power of the Holy Spirit. It springs up in glad and holy worship to the Father, and it flows out in fullness of blessing to men. The Lord does not give it in return for any surrender on our part, or effort that we can make, or price that we can pay. "I shall give," said the Lord, and "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink."

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

What the Water Is

One writer names the water and says why it is new:

But now in John 4 we get something wholly new. Jesus gives a divine gift ("I will give"): living water that forms a well within, always springing up into everlasting life, so that there shall be no more thirst. This is the Holy Spirit, whom God gives to live in the one who is born again. He is the power and energy of a life in communion with God, its source and end. Here then is a source of joy apart from all circumstances and independent of them. The joy is the deepest kind, and eternal. The source never fails, though at times the joy may be clouded over here below.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

A Spring Inside the Man

The striking word in the verse is in him. What Christ gives is not a supply kept elsewhere and fetched as needed.

We have everlasting life in Him, and we shall never be separated from Him. The man also has a well of water in himself: "The water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water." This is power coming down from God — heaven is brought down into my heart. It is the power of divine life bringing me into fellowship with the Father and the Son. It is nothing short of all that is in God dwelling in me... There is an eternal spring in my own soul. The man drinks it in — he receives it as a thirsty person — and then it becomes in him a well that makes him a partaker of what is in God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Springing Up — and Flowing Out

The water does not sit still. One writer sets out what it does in a man, and then through him for others:

He proposes to make men independent of the world... In the same way He also proposes to make them contributors to the deep need of thirsty hearts within the world. To have a deep well-spring of satisfaction within, springing up into everlasting life — this is the upper spring. It rises to its Source and Giver in intelligent appreciation and worship. And then these same refreshing waters flow out in rivers to others for their blessing too — this is the lower spring.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Thirst — every well of this world must be drunk from again; the rope only gets longer with the years.

- Gift — Jesus says, "I will give." No surrender, effort, or price buys it; thirst is all He asks.

- Indwelling — writers identify the living water as the Holy Spirit, whom God gives to live in the one born again.

- Inward — Christ puts the spring in him: an eternal spring in the soul, not a store outside that he must go and fetch.

- Upward, then outward — the well rises to its Giver in worship. The same waters then flow out in rivers to other thirsty hearts.

John 4:15 · Darby

The woman says to him, Sir, give me this water, that I may not thirst nor come here to draw.

She heard the offer of living water, and she asked for it. But what she asked for was shaped by the well, the walk, and the water jar. Was this faith? And if her asking was so small, why does Jesus answer by telling her to go and call her husband?

Her Ears, His Words

She takes what He said about water and hears it as water. One writer traces her mistake to where her thinking lived:

Heavenly things are outside the range of her thoughts. Thinking only of her daily needs, she gives the Lord's words a material meaning. Like all people, she would gladly have her daily needs met without the daily toil the fall has brought in. Men would be quite content with earthly blessings if only the curse were gone. "The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned." Apart from the Spirit, human intelligence cannot grasp divine things.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Edge of Her Asking

Christ had offered a spring rising up to eternal life. What she wanted back was a shorter errand. Notice how one commentator measures the exact distance her hopes travelled:

She would gladly learn how she might be relieved of her wants and of her labour for this world. As yet not a ray of heavenly light had entered her. Not to thirst, and not to come here to draw, formed the boundary of her desires from the Saviour — not yet known to be a Saviour, still less the Only-begotten Son.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Her water jar is not just her problem. It stands for the small circle any of us reason inside:

All true intelligence was missing in her. Her weariness and labour absorbed her, and the circle of her thoughts went no further than her water jar — that is, no further than herself, but herself owned by her circumstances. This is human life. People judge revealed things by how they relate to these circumstances.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Small Ask Grace Will Not Despise

She does not know who is speaking to her. She asks anyway — and one writer sees the start of something real in it:

She is attracted and wondering, and faith in this mysterious Speaker is beginning to wake in her soul. So she asks for this gift, promised to her for the asking. She asks, but in truth she does not know the gift of God, nor who it is that says to her, "Give Me a drink." But divine grace that is at work with her will not leave her like this, nor despise the day of small things — which is still that work begun. Her heart is touched, desire awakened, her soul turning towards God.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Prejudice Drops, Need Is Answered

Something has already broken down in her that the opening of the conversation showed was strong — she began by pointing out that Jews have no dealings with Samaritans. Now she asks a Jew for a favour, and Christ answers a deeper request than the one she made:

She, a woman of Samaria, was still ignorant of what the stranger, a Jew, was offering. Yet she puts aside all prejudice, and says, "Sir, give me this water, so that I will not be thirsty or have to come here to draw water." Relief from daily toil was all that she thought of. Yet, wonderful to say, she was now willing to owe a Jew for that. But He knew her need. He wanted to give her what she really needed, not what she asked for, so He at once replied, "Go, call your husband."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Why the Next Word Is About Her Husband

The reply in verse 16 looks like a change of subject. Commentators read it as the only route left open:

It follows that in His reply the Lord entirely passes over the woman's words. It is useless to speak further of things that are too great for a mind too small to take them in. So the Lord takes another way, and the only way by which the darkness of our minds can be cleared. He speaks to the conscience, and wins the heart. Understanding in divine things comes through the conscience, not through the intellect.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

There is also a link between the toil she wants to escape and the life she has been living:

His grace clearly had a strong pull on her. She also felt what a burden of toil was tied to sin — and you may be sure no one can sin in this world without toil and sorrow tied to it. But as yet she thought more about her toil than about her sin, so the Lord now begins to deal with her conscience. Man has a conscience. That conscience must be met and reached, and the springs of the soul's history must be touched with a sense of its sin and guilt. Otherwise there will never be a link with God, or true enjoyment of His grace.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- She asked. She did not know the gift of God, or who was speaking to her. She asked anyway, and grace treats that as the work begun.

- She asked small. Relief from her daily toil was all she wanted from Him.

- We all ask small. Her thoughts went no further than her water jar — no further than herself, held in by her circumstances. We all weigh God's words by how they touch daily life.

- He answers deeper. He gave her what she really needed, not what she asked for, and He did not despise the day of small things.

- Through the conscience. He passes over her words and speaks about her husband. She thought more of her toil than of her sin. Understanding in divine things comes by the conscience, not the intellect.

John 4:16 · Darby

Jesus says to her, Go, call thy husband, and come here.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

John 4:17 · Darby

The woman answered and said, I have not a husband. Jesus says to her, Thou hast well said, I have not a husband;

The woman had asked for water that would end her daily walk to the well. Instead, the Lord told her to go and call her husband. Her four-word answer is true as far as it goes. He agrees with it, and then finishes it for her.

Why the Lord Turned to Her Conscience

So far the conversation had been all gift. One writer explains why that was not the whole of what she needed:

Yet grace alone is not enough. Man is fallen, evil, and hostile to God without knowing it rightly, if he knows it at all. He must know his own moral ruin if he is to be saved and blessed. He must therefore know himself as well as God — himself in God's presence, as God sees him... She already felt something of His grace. But truth enters through the conscience, so that the soul may truly know both grace and truth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Truth Used as a Hiding Place

Her statement was accurate. It was also a screen:

He had been pouring out words of grace. It all flowed over her head. It passed over a heart absorbed with the things of the world. He takes the other side — not the gift of God, but the state of man: "Go, call your husband, and come here." The woman answered, "I have no husband." Quite true. She tells the truth to hide the truth — as people often do in this poor world. The conscience is reached now; and that is where the word always enters.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer puts her unspoken thought into words:

"I have no husband." How naturally we hate the light! Her inward thought was: He does not know me; I must pass myself off on Him as a virtuous woman. But she had to find herself in the presence of One who knew her infinitely better than she knew herself.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

"You Are Right" — Agreement, Not Attack

He does not contradict her. He agrees, and then fills in the rest. Notice what is missing from His reply:

"I have no husband," she answers quickly... How overwhelming, yet how gracious! There was no reproach in His mouth. He knew all men. With one word He drew from her the confession of her real state of sin and shame. He set before her such a picture of her life that it bore witness to her conscience.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

He Knew Before He Asked

The exposure told Him nothing new. He had already offered her living water, knowing her whole story:

She had lived through unusual ups and downs in marriage. And now she was living in sin. She did not tell the Lord that. He told her of her past and her present. She admitted it. He had known it all along, yet had offered her the living water. He had come to seek and to save the lost. So He did not drive her away as too unclean a person to talk with. Nor did His shining as the light make her withdraw, like someone who avoids it.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Conscience as the Doorway

Reaching the conscience opens the way in. It is how a person comes to know God, and how she came to stay rather than run:

Conscience is the avenue by which God, now that man is a sinner, enters his heart. It is also the door of understanding by which man learns God. A man feels that he is known by God, and so learns to know Him... She does not, however, go away. The fact is that the grace of Christ had triumphed, and it was the deep sense of His grace that now held her to the spot.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What She Did With the Exposure

Her answer shows how His words landed. Notice what she did not do:

Her answer proves that His words had entered her conscience, and that her soul fell under them. There was no fighting back, no excuse, no hiding or escaping from His presence. On the contrary, she stood there a convicted sinner. She owned not only that He spoke truly, but that she saw Him to be "a prophet." By the grace now at work in her, though humbled to the dust, she was content to own what she really was, and to receive from Him as from God's own mouth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace first. He offered her living water before He said a word about her husbands. He already knew it all.

- Truth next. Grace alone could not finish the work. She had to see herself as God sees her, and truth enters through the conscience.

- Her dodge. She told the truth to hide the truth. She hoped to pass herself off as a good woman to a stranger who already knew everything.

- His method. He agreed with her words and then completed them. No reproach — just her own life set before her.

- The result. Her conscience was reached, and she did not run. Grace held her at the well, and she owned Him as a prophet.

John 4:18 · Darby

for thou hast had five husbands, and he whom now thou hast is not thy husband this thou hast spoken truly.

The Lord had just told her to call her husband, and she replied that she had none. His answer agrees with her words, then fills in all she left out — five husbands, and a man now who is not her husband.

A life that had searched and come up empty

The short list of husbands sums up a whole life. One writer looks at her coming to the well alone, at the wrong hour, and sees where following her own will had left her.

This woman, tired of life, comes to draw water. Isolated in fact, isolated in her heart, she did not come at the time when women draw water. She had followed after pleasure in doing her own will. She had had five husbands, and she had probably been devoted to them. The one she had was not her husband. She was weary of life; her will and her sin had left her heart void; she was isolated and abandoned by the world.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Truth spoken to keep the truth hidden

Her "I have no husband" was accurate. It also shut a door. Notice how the Lord changes ground from what He gives to what she is.

He had been pouring out words of grace. It all flowed over her head. It passed over a heart absorbed with the things of the world. He takes the other side, not the gift of God, but the state of man — "Go, call your husband, and come here." The woman answered him, "I have no husband." Quite true. She tells the truth to hide the truth — as often happens in this poor world. The conscience is reached now: and that is where the word always enters.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the conscience, and not just the heart

Why press on her past at all? One writer explains why sin must be felt before grace can be enjoyed.

Man has a conscience. That conscience must be met and reached. The springs of the soul's history must be touched with a sense of its sin and guilt. Otherwise there will never be a link with God, or the true enjoyment of His grace.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Complete exposure, with no reproach

The wonder is not only that He knew, but how He spoke. There is no scolding — only her own words taken up and finished.

"I have no husband," she answers quickly. Jesus says to her, "You are right in saying, 'I have no husband'; for you have had five husbands, and the one you now have is not your husband. What you have said is true." How overwhelming, yet how gracious! Not a reproach in His mouth! But He who knew all men drew from her, by a word of His, the confession of her actual state of sin and shame. He set before her such a sketch of her life that her conscience had to testify: in her case at least, all things were naked and laid bare to the eyes of Him with whom she had to do.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Everything brought out in the day of grace

The Lord opened her whole record at that well. One writer shows why the timing of that exposure mattered.

He lets the light in upon her guilty life, and she feels herself in the presence of the Searcher of hearts. But it was the day of grace, and the grace in which He spoke to her enabled her to bear the searching. He told her all that she ever did. It was well for her that it took place in the day of grace. Had it taken place in the day of judgment it would have meant for her an eternity of woe. The great white throne was anticipated. All that could be brought to light was manifested, and there was no condemnation. When it was all out it was all gone.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

The light drew her instead of driving her off

Being found out usually makes people run. She stayed, and then went to tell her town about the Man who told her everything.

This stranger did not resent the light shining into the deepest recesses of her heart, for the light that exposed her in all her sin and need also revealed the heart and mind of God, and the glory of the Person of Jesus, and this divine light did not repel her — it attracted her to the Son of God. God was working with her, otherwise she would have fled when exposed, and hated the light that showed how sinful she was.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Empty. Five husbands and a sixth man left her heart void and her life isolated.

- Evasion. She told the truth to hide the truth; her accurate answer screened the real story.

- Conscience. He turned from the gift to her state, because that is where His word enters and a link with God begins.

- Grace. He laid her whole life bare, yet not one reproach came from His mouth.

- Timing. That well anticipated the great white throne. It all came out in the day of grace, and when it was all out it was all gone.

John 4:19 · Darby

The woman says to him, Sir, I see that thou art a prophet.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

John 4:20 · Darby

Our fathers worshipped in this mountain, and ye say that in Jerusalem is the place where one must worship.

Two Mountains, One Old Quarrel

The Lord has just laid her life bare, and the woman at the well answers by raising the oldest dispute between her people and His: which hill had God chosen? Behind her words stand centuries of rival altars, and her question draws out the first unfolding of Christian worship.

The Mountain She Meant

"This mountain" was Gerizim, in sight of the well where they were talking. Its place in Israel's history, and the temple later built on it, explain her confidence:

This is the mountain in Samaria where the blessings on Israel were spoken, while the curses were spoken on mount Ebal. Deuteronomy 11:29; Deuteronomy 27:12; Joshua 8:33; Judges 9:7. History records that after the temple was rebuilt in the time of Ezra, the Samaritans built a temple on this mountain. They had priests and sacrifices there, and this caused great hostility between the Jews and the Samaritans. Hyrcanus destroyed that temple, yet the Samaritans still clung to the mountain as the right place of worship, as the woman of Samaria said to the Lord. John 4:20.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why She Raised It

Commentators differ on her motive. One reads the shift from her private life to public religion as a move away from the pressure she had just felt:

For her part she at once saw and confessed that He was a prophet. In doing so she was in effect pleading guilty to His charge. Yet, as so often happens when the conscience is wounded, she tried to sidetrack the talk into a religious discussion, and so cut out the personal element.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another reads it as the real cry of a soul that now wants to be right with God:

"Sir," she says, "I perceive that You are a prophet." That is her seal set on the truth of His words. Then, with the desire He has awakened in her — to be with God, as even she, it seems, may be, and so to be right with God and to approach Him in His own way — she puts the question of questions for a Samaritan.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

"Our Fathers" — Age Is Not Authority

Her first argument is inherited practice. But long custom cannot prove that God chose the place:

"Our fathers worshiped on this mountain." That was true. For centuries the rival temple at Gerizim had been the centre of Samaritan worship. But that fact could add nothing to its claim to be the house of God. Yes, she was following in her fathers' footsteps, worshipping as they had done before her. Still the question remained: had God chosen that place to build His sanctuary, so that acceptable worship could be offered there? One word from Scripture would outweigh all the claims of Gerizim.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

"You Say" — Whose Opinion Counts

Her second argument is what the Jews say. Notice what is missing from both halves of her sentence:

With her, as with many today, it was the opinion of men that she thought of. "You say that in Jerusalem is the place where people ought to worship." Notice that she says not a word about God's will in the matter. She shows no thought of any choice Jehovah might have made, or any preference He had shown for one place over another. Yet He had clearly chosen Jerusalem.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The argument over place had a fierce grip on both peoples:

How formidable such barriers seemed to both Samaritans and Jews! The place of worship was to them so vital that they forgot the Object of worship!

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

One Real Worship, One False

The Lord does not treat the rival claims as a matter of taste. One rested on real knowledge of God; the other did not. Yet He sets both aside:

He makes a distinction between Jewish and Samaritan worship. Jewish worship was, in an important sense, genuine worship of the God of the Bible. It rested on real knowledge of the God who had revealed Himself. Samaritan worship was false worship, resting on ignorance of God... The Lord's answer sweeps away the whole idea of an earthly sanctuary — even at Jerusalem, where in former times Jehovah the God of Israel had commanded it.

Modernised from Jesus Speaks on WorshipOriginal wording

Her Small Question, His Great Answer

She asked about geography. The answer reached far past the two hills:

The Lord more than meets every desire of the Samaritan woman's heart. For here we have more than a defence of Israel's worship against its Samaritan rival. Here is the first unfolding of Christian worship ever given by God to man, and it replaces not only the Samaritan system but the Jewish one as well.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Place. Gerizim was the Samaritan centre for centuries. Its rivalry with Jerusalem bred lasting hostility.

- Proof. "Our fathers" appeals to age, and "you say" appeals to opinion; neither asks what God Himself chose.

- Person. Fixed on which hill was right, she overlooked the One she should worship — the very Person standing in front of her.

- Parity denied. Jerusalem's worship was real and God-given. Samaria's was not. Yet the Lord's reply sets aside the earthly sanctuary altogether.

- Portion. Her question about a place drew out the first unfolding of Christian worship. It went beyond both systems she named.

John 4:21 · Darby

Jesus says to her, Woman, believe me, [the] hour is coming when ye shall neither in this mountain nor in Jerusalem worship the Father.

A woman raises the oldest religious argument of her region: which mountain is the right one. Jesus does not pick a side. He tells her an hour is coming when people will worship the Father in neither place. That raises two questions. Why would God set aside the city He Himself had chosen? And what takes its place?

The Son settles the dispute

She asked about place. He answers with His own authority. His verdict clears away both rival systems — Samaritan worship and the temple at Jerusalem.

The Lord replied, "Woman, believe Me" — note His words. He speaks with authority; He knows God as no other could know Him; and He alone can reveal His thoughts. Samaritan worship never had a divine standing. It was a corrupt mixture from the beginning (2 Kings 17:41). Judaism, on the other hand, came from God at the start. But both must stand aside now. The Father stands revealed in the person of the Son of His love; all distance is ended.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why Jerusalem falls too

Setting aside a corrupt mixture is one thing. Setting aside the sanctuary God Himself authorised is another. One writer ties it to the rejection of the Son.

So, in the presence of the Son, false systems disappear. And so does what had God's own warrant as a partial revelation: not only the mountain of Samaria, but Jerusalem itself. How does this come about? Yet so it was. How could Jerusalem possibly hold its place in the presence of the rejected Son of God? The city of the great King! If they had received the great King as King, He would have taken His seat in that city, just as the ancient promise said. But this was exactly what they refused.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A name she had never heard used this way

The key word here is not "mountain" or "Jerusalem" but "the Father." Used of worship, that title was new. And it comes with a condition.

"The Father!" Surely this must have struck her as new language. Israel was God's son, His firstborn (Ex. 4:22), the children of the LORD their God (Deut. 14:1). The LORD was a Father to Israel, and Ephraim was His firstborn (Jer. 31:9). Yet they had never worshipped Him as the Father. That is because no one can know the Father except those to whom the Son will reveal Him (Matt. 11:27)... Each one, then, who knows the Father owes it to the Son of God; and only those who know Him, it is clear, can worship Him. National worship, as such, at once disappears.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Worship with no address on earth

If the holy place is gone, worship is not left homeless. Commentators point to a sanctuary above. They read the present age as a gap between two eras of temple worship.

Christian worship comes in between the pausing of Jewish worship in the past and its return in the future. Christians have no place of worship on earth; they enter no earthly temple. The holiest in the sanctuary above is their one and only place of worship (John 4:21, 23, 24; Heb. 10:19-22); their sacrifices are praise to God and practical kindness to men (Heb. 13:15-16).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Another writer draws out what this means in practice. To treat a building on earth as a sanctuary "is so far to abandon Christian ground, and to go back to the Jews' religion." It also "throws souls at a distance from God." That leaves them feeling they need a priesthood of men to stand between themselves and Him (H. H. Snell).

The coming hour, not the end of Jerusalem

Some readers stumble here. The prophets describe a future day when all nations come to Jerusalem. One writer answers that the two statements belong to different times.

Any supposed difficulty in reconciling John 4:21 with Jerusalem becoming a centre for all nations is imaginary. It comes from confusing "the hour that now is" with the day that shall be. Our Lord was thinking of the time of His rejection and His coming absence in heaven. The prophet had in view the day of His glory for the earth, which is still future. Distinguish the times, and the objection vanishes. Jerusalem has no place in the Christian system. In the coming day of Jehovah it will have a greater and holier place than it ever had of old.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer also notes the wording. Here Jesus says the hour "is coming." He does not yet add "and now is" — that comes two verses later (J. N. Darby).

Summary

- Place — Her question was where. His answer removed the where altogether. Samaritan worship never had God's authority; Jerusalem's worship once did. Both are now set aside.

- Person — "Believe Me" is the credential. The One who knows God as no other can is the only One able to announce the change.

- Father — The new name is the heart of the verse. Israel had never worshipped God as Father. Only those to whom the Son reveals Him can worship Him that way.

- Everywhere — With no sanctuary on earth, the worshipper's one place is the sanctuary above. Sacred buildings and go-between priests push people back to a distance that is already ended.

- Day — The coming hour marks the time of Christ's rejection and absence. It is not the end of Jerusalem's story: a future day of glory for that city still stands.

John 4:22 · Darby

Ye worship ye know not what; we worship what we know, for salvation is of the Jews.

The woman had raised the old argument between Samaritans and Jews about the right place to worship. Jesus moved the question from place to knowledge, and gave one reason for the difference: salvation comes from the Jews.

Worship That Does Not Know Its Object

Jesus tells the woman that her people worship what they do not know. One writer says such worship is not merely empty. Something else stands behind it.

So the Samaritan worship was all wrong. Their break from the worship carried on at Jerusalem had no authority behind it. Salvation was from the Jews. It had to come through them, and not through those who kept up the Samaritan split — and a split is a fair name for it. Besides, they worshipped what they did not know. What a solemn statement! False worship has another being behind it than God. Demons are there, not God (1 Cor. 10:20).

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

The two halves of the verse do two different things to her. One disowns her religion; the other exposes her own condition.

By saying, "You worship what you do not know," He disowned that worship. By saying, "salvation is from the Jews," He showed her that she was not saved. She stood among the Gentiles — "strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world" (Eph. 2:12). So even while they discussed worship, His words went like a blade to her conscience.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Jews Knew

Jesus says "we," putting Himself with the Jews. Their advantage was not something they invented. God gave it to them.

In verse 22 the Lord makes one conclusion impossible for the Samaritan. She might have argued that, since only Christian worship was about to be acceptable to God, and place and race no longer counted, Samaritan worship had been just as good as Jewish. It was not. The Samaritans worshipped what they did not know; the Jews knew what they worshipped, "for salvation," He added, "is from the Jews." They had "the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen." (Rom. 9:4-5.)

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Samaritan worship copied the real thing. It rested on part of the Bible, and it began for a reason that had nothing to do with faith.

The king of Assyria had deported the whole population of the northern kingdom of Israel. The Samaritans were the direct descendants of the people who took their place. They thought it wise to keep the god of that country happy, so they began to copy the worship of the Jews. They had the five books of Moses in a version still called the Samaritan Pentateuch. This was Samaritan worship, and it was a counterfeit worship of the God of Israel.

Modernised from J. S. BlackburnOriginal wording

Salvation as the Reason, Not an Aside

The little word "for" carries the argument. Knowing God depends on salvation, so where there is no salvation there is no true worship.

Compare the Jews with the Samaritans, and the Lord could say nothing else: "We worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews." Worship always matches the revelation God has given. So what could worship be where there was no salvation? Jewish worship was set out in pictures and shadows. Salvation was still a hope, not a relationship and a possession they already held.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That reason is not just about history. It decides how anyone comes to know God.

"We worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews." Do you hear that, dear friends? We come to know God, and to know the Father, through salvation. Do you not see that unless we know God as a Saviour-God, we do not know Him at all?

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Grace in the Setting

Where Jesus said this matters as much as what He said. He was among people who resented the Jews, and He still defended Israel's place.

There was presumption and ignorance in Samaria, and the Lord does not hide the advantage Israel had in every way. But notice that Jesus only says this when He is outside: He defends the Jews while He stands among their rivals, and while He Himself is rejected. What grace! ... The rejected Lord does not deny what truly had honour, even though it was now working against Him. He does not belittle the line of promise.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From the Jews to the Ends of the Earth

Salvation started from one nation, but it was never meant to stop there.

"Salvation is from the Jews" (John 4:22), but now it was to be carried to the ends of the earth. So God woke Cornelius, a Gentile, to want the full blessing as it flowed out, and brought him to know forgiveness through the name of the Lord Jesus.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. Salvation has a channel — it came from the Jews, along the line of promise, and the Christ came from their race.

- Knowledge. The Jews knew whom they worshipped because salvation was among them. Worship always matches the revelation God gives.

- Ignorance. Samaritan worship copied the real thing without the revelation. False worship has another being behind it than God.

- Grace. Jesus defended Israel's place while He stood among their rivals, and while Israel was rejecting Him.

- Reach. What began with one nation went out to the ends of the earth, and reached Gentiles like Cornelius.

John 4:23 · Darby

But [the] hour is coming and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth; for also the Father seeks such as his worshippers.

At a well, a Samaritan woman has just asked Jesus where people should worship — on her mountain, or in Jerusalem. His answer sets that question aside and announces an hour when the Father Himself goes looking for worshippers.

The Hour That Ended the Holy Place

Her question assumed that worship needs a sacred address. The Lord's reply removes it:

First, our Lord here plainly teaches that from now on there would be no special place of worship on earth. Jerusalem had been the sacred place where the temple of God stood. His people travelled there year by year from all parts of the land. But along with the rejection of Christ, their house, until then the house of God, was left to them desolate. Never since that time has there been a material house of God upon earth. The Church is now the dwelling place of God through the Spirit. Our place of worship is now inside the torn veil, in the immediate presence of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Father Revealed

The change is not only in the place but in the One worshipped. Jesus names Him the Father. One writer shows how startling that was for a woman with her past:

We might have pictured the Almighty as needing to be appeased first. Only then would He accept the honour due to Him as Creator, from people who begged for permission to offer it. But now she learned that He is the Father, and that as the Father He is seeking worshippers. Men and women like her, who deserved only everlasting ruin, could worship Him in that relationship. This was new indeed, and full of grace.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

"In Spirit and in Truth"

Each of the two words has a definite sense. Together they rule out empty ritual, and any thought of God that stops short of how He has revealed Himself:

To worship "in spirit" is to worship according to the true nature of God. It is worship in the power of the communion the Holy Spirit gives. It stands in contrast to worship made up of forms and ceremonies, and to the religiousness that human nature can produce. To worship "in truth" is to worship God according to the revelation He has been pleased to give of Himself. So it would not be worship "in truth" now to worship Him only as "a great God," "our Maker," and "a great King above all gods," as in Psalm 95. He has chosen to reveal Himself in another light, as "Father" to those who are His.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Father Seeking

The verse ends with a reason, and it reverses the usual direction of religion:

In this hour it was no longer a question of what man ought to be for God, but of what God is for the sinner. "The Father is seeking such people to worship Him." As for man's worship, it was all worthless. You can build a machine to perform ceremonies if you are clever enough to make one… This is not God demanding worship. As man's duty, worship is quite right. But the Lord is here in grace, and out of the abundance of His heart He says, "The Father is seeking" worshippers. He is not looking at forms of worship; He is seeking vile, broken-down sinners to make them worshippers.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Who Can Be a True Worshipper

So can anyone start worshipping at will? The word true stands in the way, and one writer ties it back to the woman herself:

It is worse than useless, "in the hour that now is," to pretend to worship our God and Father unless we are genuine worshippers. … Adam had become conscious of his sin. So when he heard God's voice in the garden, he hurried to hide from Him. So would all uncleansed worshippers, if they heard His voice today. It is not a question of sincerity, but of salvation. Cleansing by the blood of Jesus is absolutely necessary. We cannot worship Him in spirit and in truth until we know Him by faith, as revealed by and in His Son. And we never know Him like that until His word convicts us of what we have done and what we are, as it convicted the Samaritan woman.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"And Now Is"

Jesus does not push this hour into the future. He says it has already arrived:

Worship is the outgoing of the heart in heaven. Worship for us now is real. It is the greatest privilege the Christian is brought into while on earth. A Christian in this way anticipates the mind and occupation of heaven. He will still be a worshipper when glorified; but he is a worshipper here, for the hour "now is when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth; for the Father seeks such to worship him."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Seeking. The Father is not waiting to be found. He is out looking — and He looks for broken-down sinners, not for people with impressive forms.

- Finding. What He finds, He first makes. The woman was convicted, then cleansed, then a worshipper. Nobody worships "in truth" without coming to know God through His Son.

- Freeing. Because He seeks worshippers, no mountain and no building owns worship. Since Christ's rejection, there has been no material house of God on earth. Believers now worship in God's own presence.

- Filling. "In spirit" means worship that matches God's own nature and rises by the Holy Spirit. "In truth" means worship that matches how He has revealed Himself — as Father, not only as Maker.

- Now. The hour is not pending. Worship is heaven's occupation, started early. It is the highest privilege open to a Christian on earth.

John 4:24 · Darby

God [is] a spirit; and they who worship him must worship [him] in spirit and truth.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

John 4:25 · Darby

The woman says to him, I know that Messias is coming, who is called Christ; when *he* comes he will tell us all things.

The talk at the well has moved from a drink of water to worship. The woman answers with her last hope — a coming Messiah who will explain everything — and she says it to His face.

The title she reached for

She uses two names side by side: Messiah and Christ. They are the same title in two languages, and the title has a precise meaning.

An official title of the Lord Jesus, which came to be used as a name. In John 1:41 and John 4:25 this title is linked with the Messiah of the Old Testament. The Jews and Samaritans were expecting THE MESSIAH, "who is called Christ." ... The Hebrew word is mashiach and means "anointed." The same word is used of the high priest and the king as God's anointed; but the Lord Jesus is emphatically "the Anointed." The title refers to the Lord as Man, anointed with the Holy Spirit.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why a Samaritan was waiting at all

The Samaritans were rivals of the Jews, yet she speaks of a coming Messiah. One writer traces her hope to the Scriptures they kept — the first five books of the Bible.

It is an interesting fact that the Samaritans — the religious rivals of the Jews (John 4) — had a copy of the Pentateuch written in the ancient Phoenician or Hebrew characters. So it was not a translation. They regarded it with unusual reverence, and from it the Samaritan woman learned that Messiah was to come (John 4:25).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

What she expected from Him was instruction rather than rescue. One writer, noting how the phrase about Christ has been read as the writer's own explanation, records this observation on her hope:

"The woman expected a teacher, not a liberator."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer points to where her hope of full teaching likely came from:

Her expectation of full teaching from Him was very probably grounded on the passage in Deuteronomy 18:15-19. When He came, He would settle disputed points and decide every matter of doubt.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Nothing left to fall back on

She does not say this at the start. She says it after Christ has uncovered her life and left her worship with nothing to stand on.

The deep meaning of the Lord's words may be entirely beyond what the woman can grasp, but at least they convince her that she cannot do without Christ. As the Prophet, Christ has spoken to her conscience and brought her face to face with her sins. In the presence of her sins she feels that earthly religion, whether in this place or that, will be of no use. Her sins exposed and her religion withered up, she knows that none but the coming Christ can meet her case. Christ as the Prophet has convinced her of her need of Christ as a Saviour. Her language is really the expression of the desire, "Oh that Christ were come!"

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Handing over what she could not work out

Her sentence admits as much as it believes. She hands the whole problem over to Someone else.

This woman did not have the Spirit, and so she could only look to others to teach her about everything. She felt these things reached out into a far fuller and richer system than she could take in. They were out of her reach. She had been brought to this — to feel that all her wisdom was ignorance. But there was One who would tell her all things. She had this one resource: she had heard and knew that Messiah is coming. So she threw her ignorance over onto Him. It was a happy moment for her soul. "I who speak to you am He," said Jesus. That was enough.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The telling had already begun

She spoke of an explanation still to come. It had already happened to her, point by point, in that talk.

"He will tell us all things" was the estimate she had formed of the Messiah. The One who sat there by the well had told her about her present and past life. He had told her too about the falsity of the Samaritan worship. He had told her what He could give. He had told her about God, and about the worshippers the Father was seeking, and He crowned it all by telling her that He was the Christ.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The one thing still missing

The Lord had reached her conscience. Her heart still had one thing to receive.

One thing more she needed, and He was waiting to give it: to know Him as already come, the One the Father sent. Without that there is no Christianity. He is everything, as He is in all who are His; but He is also for anyone, as the gospel announces, and the woman here discovers.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Anointed. "Messiah" and "Christ" are one title in two languages. It means anointed, and Jews and Samaritans alike were waiting for Him.

- Expected. Her hope came from the first five books of the Bible, which the Samaritans kept — most likely from Deuteronomy 18, where the coming One settles every disputed point.

- Emptied. She says it only after Christ uncovers her past and leaves her religion no shelter. She has nothing left but the Christ who is coming.

- Entrusted. She admitted that all her wisdom was ignorance. She threw that ignorance onto Him, and that was the turning point.

- Encountered. The One she waited for had already explained her, her worship, God, and Himself. She needed only to know Him as present — and He gave that in one sentence.

John 4:26 · Darby

Jesus says to her, I who speak to thee am [he].

The woman at the well has just named her one hope: a coming Messiah who will settle every question. The tired traveller who asked her for a drink answers that He is the One. Why did Jesus make that claim here, and why to her?

The One Open Claim

Commentators note how rare this moment is.

John 4:26 and following — The first direct assertion by our Lord that He is "the Christ," and outside Jewish territory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The title was rare on His own lips. One writer links that silence to the death He came to die.

You never find the Lord saying He is the Christ, except to the woman of Samaria, "I who speak to you am He," and that was to a person who had no right to Christ. He delights to call Himself Son of man. He knew He had come to give His life a ransom for many, and so could not speak of Himself as the Christ. The Gospels are really the history of His rejection. In Samaria it was out of the way to do it, in one sense, because salvation is of the Jews.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Conscience First

Before He tells her who He is, He has told her what she is. That exposure is what makes her long for the One standing there.

In the presence of her sins she feels that earthly religion, whether in this place or that, will be of no use. Her sins exposed and her religion withered up, she knows that none but the coming Christ can meet her case. Christ as the Prophet has convinced her of her need of Christ as a Saviour. Her words are really the expression of the desire, "Oh that Christ were come!"

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Not Merely "I Am He"

The exact wording carries the weight. He does not point to a Messiah somewhere else.

It was not merely, "I am He," but "I who speak to you am He." In these words He reveals His glory. He stands before her as the Messiah. He could, as she had said, tell all things. And He had now, as she had proved, really told all things — things that were terrible to hear for an awakened conscience. But He reveals it along with the sweet, humble, inviting grace of one who was sitting and talking with her. And this gave her soul the right to find freedom where she might have expected to be overwhelmed.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Her Own Test Met

She had said the Messiah would tell them all things. One writer counts up what He had already told her.

The One who sat by the well had told her of her past and present life. He had also told her that the Samaritan worship was false. He had told her what He could give. He had told her about God, and about the worshippers the Father was seeking. And to crown it all, He had now told her that He was the Christ.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Received, Not Explained

Her grasp of His words was thin. What settled the matter was not her understanding but His answer.

Her understanding may have been small. She could not grasp what Jesus had told her. Still, His love meets her where she can receive blessing and life, and He replies, "I who speak to you am He." The work was done: she had received the Lord. A poor Samaritan sinner receives the Messiah of Israel, whom the priests and the Pharisees had rejected from among the people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Two Ways to Meet Him

The well is a pattern, not an exception. A warning comes with it for anyone who puts off the meeting.

Faith always meets Christ. He is the great divine discovery to the soul. All must meet Him on the throne one day. But this will be everlasting ruin for those who do not meet Him now. For them it will be judgment… To meet Him now by faith is life and salvation, as the Samaritan proved. Thousands saw and heard Him while on earth. But where there was no faith, there was no life. It was when the woman believed that she received the blessing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Exposed — He reached her conscience first. Her sins uncovered and her religion emptied out, she needed the very Christ she named.

- Revealed — to that need He gives the one open claim of His ministry, outside Jewish territory, to a woman with no right to it.

- Near — the force is in "who speak to you": the Messiah is not a distant figure but the One already talking with her in grace.

- Received — her understanding was small, but she received Him: a Samaritan sinner welcomed the Messiah the leaders had rejected.

- Now — everyone meets Him in the end. Meeting Him by faith today is the difference between blessing and judgment.

John 4:27 · Darby

And upon this came his disciples, and wondered that he spoke with a woman; yet no one said, What seekest thou? or, Why speakest thou with her?

The disciples come back from town and find their Master at a well in Samaria, talking with a Samaritan woman. They are astonished — yet not one of them asks Him why.

Not Fit for a Rabbi

Their surprise had a reason behind it. Commentators point to a rule of Jewish teaching:

The rule of the Jewish teachers, often quoted (from Dr. John Lightfoot), was that a man should not speak even to his wife in the street... The writer's knowledge of this prejudice is one of the signs that he was himself a Jew.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Custom and grace pulled in opposite directions:

It was contrary to man's thoughts that God should stoop so low, as to sit talking like this to a vile Samaritan woman. The disciples marvelled that He talked with her in this way. It was not fitting, they thought, for a Rabbi. Very likely! But it was fitting for God in grace.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Greater Marvel They Missed

Their astonishment stopped at the sight of Him speaking with a woman. She had far more reason to wonder than they did:

Their wonder was that He spoke with a woman. What was hers, who knew that every secret of her heart lay open before Him? His grace, however, had fully prepared the way... She was not the one seeking, at any rate: the Father was seeking such people. And it was not a matter of talking with her, but of revealing to her. The disciples had much to learn. If they had known what the conversation was about, they would have wondered far more.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Grace Beyond Their Thoughts

They understood one thing about Him and missed another:

Meanwhile the disciples come, and — naturally — marvel at His talking with the woman. They understood that He was their Master, the Messiah. But the grace of God shown in the flesh was still beyond their thoughts.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Their limit went deeper still. Even the glory of His Sonship was beyond them:

The disciples came up and marvelled, for they could not understand the glory that His Sonship gave Him... He was talking with a Samaritan woman; what did this mean? They did not have the Spirit. So they could see nothing of the great harvest that the Spirit — who dwelt in Him without measure — would bring in as the servant of the Father's love.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Question No One Asked

The verse also records what no one said. Commentators differ on what that silence meant. One reads it as communion — a shared sense of His mind that needed no words:

In John 4 the disciples beautifully sensed His spirit, and stood back, keeping silent. That is communion. The deepest and richest communion is often silent. No one said, "Why are You talking with her?"

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Another reads it as distance — thoughts they were not willing to bring to Him:

The disciples, returning from the city, "marveled that he was talking with a woman". Slow to appreciate the greatness of the grace of God, they marvelled, even as we still marvel, at such a scene. Sadly, as so often, ignorance of grace goes with moral distance from the Lord. So they were afraid to tell Him the thoughts passing through their minds. They did not see that God, in the greatness of His grace, had come down into this world in the Person of the Son to seek worshippers.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Marvellous Because It Is Grace

The disciples marvelled at the broken custom. There was something far better to marvel at:

The disciples came and marvelled that He talked with the woman, and well they might, for the grace that made Him do it was marvellous. That grace looks for no merit in its objects, but blesses them because of what it is itself... The Shepherd had found His sheep. The Father had found one of the first of those worshippers who would worship Him in spirit and in truth. The Father and the Son rejoiced together.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Marvel — the disciples marvelled only that He spoke with a woman. Jewish teaching said a man should not speak even to his wife in the street.

- Misplaced — their wonder landed on the broken custom, not on the conversation. If they had known what He was saying, they would have wondered far more.

- Missing — they knew Him as Messiah. But grace shown in flesh was beyond their thoughts, and they saw nothing of the harvest ahead.

- Mute — no one asked Him a thing. Commentators differ: was that silence communion with His mind, or distance from Him?

- Marvellous — the true wonder is grace itself. It looks for no merit, and blesses because of what it is.

John 4:28 · Darby

The woman then left her waterpot and went away into the city, and says to the men,

At Jacob's well a Samaritan woman has just heard Jesus say who He is, and the disciples arrive back from town. She puts down the jar she came for and walks away, and commentators read that small act as proof of a change inside her.

The Jar as a Picture of What Filled Her

The water jar was not just luggage. Writers read it as the measure of her whole world, and they note that the Holy Spirit recorded that she left it.

We saw the poor woman completely absorbed with her water-pot. But the moment her conscience was fully reached, she goes off to testify to the others: if you only get Christ, He will tell you all things. She leaves her water-pot. The Holy Spirit has not recorded it for nothing. The thing that absorbed her is gone. The word and power of Jesus gave her conviction of sin. That same word and power put Christ in the place of the things that had power over her heart: Christ for my righteousness instead of my sins; Christ as the object for my heart instead of my cares.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same writer explains why she could walk away without shame.

She left her water-pot and went into the city, filled with the thoughts of Jesus, to speak to the men of One who had told her all things that she ever did. Where the heart is full, circumstances are most forgotten. Notice too that the importance of Jesus in her mind had taken away the pain of the discovery of her state.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why She Became a Worker

One writer lists the motives that might explain her rush into town, then rejects them all.

She came to the well with an empty pitcher: she left it with a full heart... But what made her a worker in the cause? Was it simply the pleasure of hearing something new? Was it the fascination of listening to a Teacher of commanding ability? Was it self-satisfaction, which enjoys the importance of carrying startling news to other people? Her news was indeed startling; her message was news — good news... But what made her a worker in the cause was that her conscience had first been dealt with by the Lord. Heart work in her came before lip service. And so it must always be in real service for Him.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Straight Back to the Town That Knew Her

She does not go somewhere new to start over. She goes to the one town where her history was public.

She leaves her waterpot in a moment, because now she has Christ instead of her cares as well as her sins. She goes away filled with unspeakable joy... Anyway, she left her waterpot and went into the city, where everybody knew her, and where people might have sneered at her, and where women would not be seen walking on the same side of the street with her, and there announced, "Come, see a man who told me all that I ever did."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Another writer draws the same line, and adds what the town now hears from her.

Now she has found a new Object in life — Christ fills her soul; so she leaves her water pot and returns to the city to become a witness, in the very place of her sin, to the One who has set her free.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Sent by No One, Certain of a Welcome

Jesus gave her no instructions. That is what makes her boldness striking.

He had not formally sent her, yet she went boldly with the invitation. Nor was it merely that she told them to go: "Come, see a Man." She would go along with them. Her heart was in the current of His grace. She counted on the same welcome for others as for herself, however unwarranted that might seem. Such is the power of Divine love even from the very first.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Water Could Wait

Another writer weighs her errand against the moment she was in.

She rightly felt the all-importance of the moment, not for herself only but for others. Her ordinary duty could well wait. It meant nothing to her now to avoid the crowd of women at the well... What were critical tongues now? She had heard the Shepherd's voice... She left her waterpot therefore. To know Him was the great business. Another time was just as good for the waterpot.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The result did not stop with her.

The stream of blessing widens. The woman becomes the messenger of Christ, telling out in the city the blessing she has received... She has left her water-pot behind to carry the news of living water. Her story wins her many listeners, who come out of the city to find the One who has lit up this dark heart with His love.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Conscience — she became a worker only because the Lord had first dealt with her conscience. Heart work came before lip service.

- Exchange — Christ took the place of what had power over her heart. He became her righteousness instead of her sins, and her one object instead of her cares.

- Forgetfulness — where the heart is full, circumstances are forgotten. She left the jar that had held her whole world where it stood.

- Boldness — no one sent her, yet she went to the town that knew her worst. She counted on the same welcome for others that she had received.

- Widening — one abandoned water-pot carried the news of living water, and the city came out to find Him.

John 4:29 · Darby

Come, see a man who told me all things I had ever done is not he the Christ?

The woman came to the well for water and went home without it. What she carries back instead is a question, put to the neighbours who knew her worst.

The Waterpot Left Behind

She left her water jar behind. One writer sees in that dropped jar the sign of a heart with a new object.

We saw the poor woman completely absorbed with her water-pot. But the moment the Lord reached her conscience, she goes off to tell the others. If you only get Christ, He will tell you all things. She leaves her water-pot. The Holy Spirit has not recorded it for nothing. The thing that absorbed her is gone. The word and power of Jesus gave her conviction of sin. That same word put Christ in the place of the things that had power over her heart: Christ for my righteousness instead of my sins; Christ as the object for my heart instead of my cares.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Back to the People Who Knew Her

Her news takes her straight back to the people she had most reason to avoid.

She is a transformed creature. I do not think any man or woman can be filled with the grace of God — the grace that met me in my sins as it met her in hers — without wanting to tell everyone else about Him. She left her waterpot and went into the city. Everybody there knew her. People might have sneered at her, and women would not walk on the same side of the street with her. There she announced, "Come, see a man who told me all that I ever did." What confidence she had in Him!

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Conscience First, Then Speech

Plenty of motives could send someone running with news. One writer traces hers to what the Lord had already done inside her.

But what made her a worker in the cause was that her conscience had first been dealt with by the Lord. Heart work in her came before lip service. And so in real service for Him it must always be. And just because there was conscience work in her, she could not rest content. She had to say to the men of that city, "Come, see a man who told me all that I ever did. Can this be the Christ?" What she had done, and what she was, Christ had told her. A living, Divine Person had done a work in her through personal contact. He had spoken to her conscience; He had reached her heart.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Exposed and Still Loved

Being known that fully is usually a threat. She turns it into proof of who He must be.

And who is this blessed Man? One, she says, "who told me all that I ever did." He told me, but He did not tell anyone else. Then she adds, "Can this be the Christ?" Yes, she was right. This must be the Christ. Who but Christ would tell me all that I ever did, and still love me and draw me to Himself?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

"Come, See" — Not "Take My Word"

Her invitation does not ask them to take her word for it.

Telling them what she had heard, whom she had seen, and whom she had talked with was not enough for her. She wanted others to meet with Him for themselves. They did so. True spiritual instinct prompted her to bring them to Christ, as the thing that would settle their souls in the truth about Him.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

She does not just point down the road. Her word is come, and she means to walk back with them.

He had not formally sent her, yet she went boldly with the invitation. She did not just tell them to go: "Come, see a man." She would go along with them. Her heart was in the current of His grace. Unlikely as it might seem, she counted on the same welcome for others as for herself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Sentence Anyone Can Say

Her words need no training to repeat. One writer sets that against evangelism left to the professionals.

What marks our day is so much official evangelism and so little simple, natural testimony. That testimony is the necessary outflow of full hearts — of people who have been in Christ's company and cannot help saying to those around them what it costs no education and no special gift to say: "Come, see a man who told me all that I ever did. Can this be the Christ?" A great and effective preacher was that poor Samaritan woman! What had made her so? What she says herself, the company of Christ. It is this that loosens the tongue and gives it real eloquence.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Conscience — the work started inside. Heart work came before lip service, and that is the order in all real service for Him.

- Exchange — the dropped waterpot marks a swap. Christ became her righteousness in place of her sins, and the object of her heart in place of her cares.

- Courage — she takes the message into the city. Everybody there knew her, and people might have sneered at her.

- Invitation — she does not send them; she says come, counting on the same welcome for them that she had received.

- Result — she pointed them to Him, not to herself, and they came and met Him for themselves.

John 4:30 · Darby

They went out of the city and came to him.

The woman came to Jacob's well for water and went home without it. This verse is what came of it: a whole town walking out to meet the Man she told them about.

The Waterpot Left Behind

The pot she carried stood for the routine that had filled her days. When something greater took that place, the pot stopped mattering.

The disciples are slow to feel the blessedness of the Lord's grace. But on the woman it has an immediate and practical effect. Until now her daily work had absorbed her, and the water pot was only a symbol of it. Now she has found a new Object in life — Christ fills her soul. So she leaves her water pot and returns to the city. There, in the very place of her sin, she becomes a witness to the One who has set her free.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why She Could Speak

Her errand reversed. She arrived to fill one vessel; she went back for many. What made her a worker was the Lord's work on her conscience.

She left Him, but to serve. She came to the well with an empty pitcher; she left it with a full heart. She had gone in her loneliness to the spring with her waterpot. She would return with many empty vessels — human hearts, which needed what she had known: personal contact with the Christ… What made her a worker in the cause was this: the Lord had first dealt with her conscience. Heart work in her came before lip service. And so it must always be in real service for Him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Message Anyone Can Carry

Preaching here needed no office and no skill. It needed time in Christ's company.

What marks this day is so much official evangelism, with so little simple natural testimony according to the apostolic order — "I believed, and so I spoke". This is the necessary overflow of full hearts. Those who have been in Christ's company cannot help saying to those around what it takes no education and no special gift to say — "Come, see a man who told me all that I ever did. Can this be the Christ?" A great and effective preacher was that poor Samaritan woman! What had made her so? What she says herself: the company of Christ. Christ had been speaking to her. This is what loosens the tongue and gives it real eloquence.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Going With Them, Not Sending Them

She does not stay behind. Her invitation is "come," and she walks back to the well with them.

The moral change was immense. A new world opened to her. It outshone the present with new affections and new duties… She felt who needed Him most, and she acted at once. She left her waterpot, went off to the town, and told the men about Jesus. How well she understood Him! He had not formally sent her, yet she went boldly with the invitation. Nor was it merely that she told them to go: "Come, see a Man." She would go along with them. Her heart was in the current of His grace. It counted on the same welcome for others as for herself, however unlikely that might seem.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Fields Already White

The natural harvest was still four months away. The Lord pointed His disciples to another one, already ripe: the people walking out of the town toward Him.

While sitting by the well the Lord had ministered to one poor woman's soul. But now, lifting up His eyes, He saw — and drew the disciples' attention to — the sight of the people streaming out of the city to meet Him. "Lift up your eyes, and see that the fields are white for harvest." People could not enjoy God's blessing on the soil in an abundant harvest for four months yet. Still, there was a harvest to reap at once. It came from seed sown long before, which had sprouted and was now ripening fast under the presence of Him who will one day appear to Israel in their land as the "Sun of Righteousness."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Her Word Started Them; His Word Settled Them

Being drawn out by someone else's story is a beginning, not an ending. The townspeople say so themselves two days later.

This may draw people, just as the testimony of the woman who met the Lord Jesus at the well drew the men of Samaria (John 4:28-30). But only meeting the Lord Jesus Himself truly brought them to God. We see it in their words to the woman: "It is no longer because of what you said that we believe, for we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this is indeed the Savior of the world" (v. 42).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The older translation this writer quoted reads "this is indeed the Christ, the Savior of the world."

Summary

- Dropped — the waterpot stood for her daily routine; once Christ filled her soul, she left it where it lay.

- Dealt with — the Lord searched her conscience first. Heart work came before lip service, and that is the order in all real service.

- Declared — she used no training and no title, only what she had heard from Christ Himself. She went straight to the people who knew her worst.

- Drawn — the townspeople walking out to Jesus were the harvest the Lord pointed to. It was ripe from seed sown long before.

- Discovered — her word brought them out. His own word convinced them, and they called Him Savior of the world for themselves.

John 4:31 · Darby

But meanwhile the disciples asked him saying, Rabbi, eat.

The woman ran back to town. The disciples came back from buying food and urged a tired Man by a well to eat. His reply — that He had food they knew nothing about — turned a meal into a lesson on what keeps a servant of God going.

The Title They Used

They address Him as "Rabbi" — the title the Jews gave to a teacher.

A title of respect among the Jews, meaning "master, teacher." As far as we know, no one used it before the time of Herod the Great. People used it of the Lord, though the older Authorized Version often translates it "master."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Their request was affectionate, even if their thoughts stopped at the body.

The disciples were occupied with material wants rather than spiritual needs. Yet their words show how much they loved the Lord. We read that they urged Him, "Rabbi, eat." In His reply the Lord did not deny the needs of the body. But He showed that He had a source of food and joy that they knew little or nothing about.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Thinking Of Bread At Such A Moment

He had just won a soul at that well. His followers stood in the same place and thought about lunch. His answer made them feel the distance.

How humbling to find His disciples at such a time occupied with the body and its wants. And this the Lord makes them feel by His answer. They did not yet know such food, disciples though they were. People often misquote it as "His meat and His drink." That is not what it says. Beyond doing His will and finishing His work, there was an inner spring of loving His Father and delighting in Him. But this was His food. He came to do His will. In this He was never wearied, nor should we be even now, whatever the fatigue of the body.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fed Without Food

He sat down at that well hungry, thirsty and tired. One writer sets this beside Mark 4, where sleep restored the same tired Man.

In Mark 4 He had gone through a day of toil, and in the evening He was tired, as any man is after work. Sleep then restores Him for His work in the morning. In John 4 He is weary again, hungry and thirsty as well. He sits on the well at Sychar, waiting until the disciples return from the neighbouring village with food. But when they come back they find Him feasted and rested already. He had had a different refreshment from any they could have brought Him, or that sleep could have provided. He had been happy in the fruit of His labour.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Another writer points out what He never received at that well.

He had asked the woman for a drink from Jacob's well, and we never read that He received it. Now He seemed indifferent to the food the disciples had bought in the city.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A Joy Not Yet Shared

They could offer Him bread. They could not yet share the gladness He was living on.

His was a hidden joy, which no one yet shared or knew: the joy of doing the Father's will for its own sake, and of finishing His work. He was looking forward to a joy shared with others, in the fruit gathered to eternal life. Only the first of these was His portion now. The joy together He had to wait for; He was ever the lonely One, ever solitary. The deepest loneliness is not about place. It is about people. It comes when no one around you understands, and no one shares your feelings and tastes, your thoughts and hopes.

Modernised from R. EvansOriginal wording

What Servants Learn Here

The woman went home having learned who He was. The disciples had a different lesson to learn — how to work for God.

The woman had learnt her lesson: the Christ had come. The disciples were now to learn theirs — the spirit in which true service is to be done, shown in the example of the Master Himself... So He, the One the Father sent, shows us what true service is: simply and faithfully doing the work God marks out for the servant. How quickly people let visible results sway them! The Lord's food as a Servant was to do the work appointed, whatever the results might be.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

This does not make hunger unspiritual. It sets it in its place.

The servants of God get hungry and tired like other people. Even the Son of God sat in weariness on the well of Sychar while His disciples went into the town to buy food. But the spiritual rises above the physical.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Rabbi. The title they use means teacher. The teacher answers their call to eat with a lesson they did not expect.

- Love. Their concern was real; their range was small. They thought of His body in the hour He won a soul.

- Food. Something fed Him that they never carried out of the city: the fruit of His own labour in one sinner's heart.

- Loneliness. That joy was, for the moment, His alone — none around Him could share what He was tasting.

- Service. Do the work God appoints, whatever the results look like. The body's needs are allowed, but never in charge.

John 4:32 · Darby

But he said to them, I have food to eat which ye do not know.

The disciples had gone into the town, bought food, and come back to find Jesus still sitting by the well. They urge Him to eat. His answer points to a supply they had not carried back and did not recognise.

Eating as a Picture of Satisfaction

Scripture uses the word "eat" in more than one way. One of them fits this verse: the contentment a person finds in the work in front of them.

Besides its common use, this word also has a symbolic sense of consuming or destroying: they "eat up my people as they eat bread" (Ps. 14:4)… It also covers receiving, digesting, and delighting in God's words: "Your words were found, and I ate them, and your words became to me a joy and the delight of my heart" (Jer. 15:16)… And it expresses the satisfaction of doing the work that is before the soul. The Lord said, "I have food to eat that you do not know about." John 4:32.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What Had Refreshed Him

Set this scene beside another. In Mark 4 sleep restores Jesus after a hard day. Here He is restored before the food arrives.

In Mark 4 He had gone through a day of toil, and in the evening He was tired, as nature will be after labour. Sleep then comes to Him, to restore Him to His work when the morning came. In John 4 He is weary again, hungry and thirsty too. He sits on the well at Sychar, waiting for the disciples to bring food from the village. But when they come back they find Him already feasted and rested. He had had a different refreshment from any which they could have brought Him, or sleep have provided Him. He had been happy in the fruit of His labour… A poor, careless sinner had been made happy by Him.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

His rest came from a different spring than the one He sat beside.

See the Lord refreshing His spirit when the pride of man rejected Him! Not with the water of the well, but with love that finds its joy in hearts full of misery. He drank from the one refreshing well-spring that has visited this world! He had food to eat His disciples knew nothing of.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A Hunger Deeper Than the Body's

His body's need was real. A deeper need in His soul went beyond it.

In His soul there was a deep need that went far beyond the need of the body. He had been meeting that need of His soul, while the disciples looked after bits of bread for the body. He hungered and thirsted until He had fully done the work His Father sent Him to do.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

"That You Do Not Know"

He says this to the men closest to Him, and it shows how far their thoughts were from His. Older translations read "meat" here where the ESV reads "food."

How humbling to find His disciples at such a time occupied with the body and its wants. And this the Lord makes them feel by His answer. They did not yet know such food, disciples though they were. People often quote it as "His meat and His drink," but that is not what He said. Beyond doing His will and completing His work, there was an inner spring of loving and delighting in His Father. But this was His food. He came to do His will. In this He was never wearied, nor should we be even now, whatever the fatigue of the body.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Lesson for Anyone Who Serves

The verse also teaches how to serve. Commentators differ on where His refreshment lay. Bellett points to the fruit of His work; Stuart points past it.

Labourers are too often influenced by whether results appear or not… Was He indifferent to results? Far from it, as Isaiah 49:4 and Matthew 11:20-24 declare. But He was the perfect Servant, perfect in everything else. His food was to do the will of Him who sent Him and to finish His work. True, in doing it He must have had joy we cannot measure. He saw one poor sinner's heart open under His teaching, like a flower opening in the warmth of the sun… But His food came from elsewhere.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Food — "Eating" stands for the satisfaction of doing the work set before the soul. Jeremiah "ate" God's words the same way and found them his delight.

- Hidden — The supply was real, but the men who had just bought the food could not see it. They thought about the body; He drew on another source.

- Deeper — Under the body's hunger lay a hunger of soul. It would not rest until He finished the Father's work.

- Refreshed — One woman's blessing rested Him more than food or sleep could. He drank from love, not from the well.

- Untiring — That food was the will of the One who sent Him, and it never wore Him out. The same table stands open to His servants today, whatever the body's fatigue.

John 4:33 · Darby

The disciples therefore said to one another, Has any one brought him [anything] to eat?

Jesus has just told His disciples He has food they know nothing about. Instead of asking Him what He means, they turn to each other for an ordinary explanation. Their question assumes someone carried a meal to the well while they were away. It shows how far their thoughts were from His.

Occupied with the body while He was feeding on something else

The disciples had gone into the city to buy food. They came back worried that He had not eaten. Their care was real, but it reached no further than His body.

"But He said to them, I have food to eat which you do not know." How humbling to find His disciples at such a time occupied with the body and its wants. And this the Lord makes them feel by His answer. They did not yet know such food, disciples though they were.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same mistake the woman had just made

Earlier in the chapter the Samaritan woman heard Jesus speak of water and thought of the well. Now the men closest to Him hear Him speak of food and think of a lunch basket.

He seemed to take no interest in the food the disciples had bought in the city. Yet He did have refreshment and food, as He talked with the woman at the well. "Master, eat," His disciples asked Him... His answer, "I have food to eat that you do not know of," told of something they had not brought, which fed Him. They could not grasp His meaning, for their thoughts, like the woman's, were tied to earthly things. So He kindly explained it.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Kelly notes that the comparison is an old one, and that it clears the woman of any special blame:

Augustine remarks here that we should not be surprised that the woman did not understand the water Christ spoke of to her. After all, His own disciples misunderstood what He said about food.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why they could not follow Him there

Their blank response was not just slowness. Darby traces it to something they did not yet have.

The disciples came up and marvelled. They could not understand the glory His Sonship set Him in. He could have sympathy with none but the Father here; the thing was out of their reach. He was talking with a Samaritan woman; what was the meaning of this? They did not have the Spirit, and could see nothing of how large the harvest would be. The Spirit dwelt in Him without measure, and would bring that harvest in as the minister of the Father's love.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where His refreshment came from

They asked whether some man had brought Him something. The answer is no. No errand into the city could supply what fed Him: sinners believing.

The Lord Himself found it so. This He did in Samaria. How free and happy was He there, whether at the well of Jacob or in the village of Sychar. He was there, as at home, for two days; for the ground had been freshly ploughed up and visited. Sinners were learning salvation, and their faith spread a feast for Him. He had food to eat there — food that even the hard work of those who were always with Him could not supply.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

What their mistake teaches

He answers their puzzled question by naming His food outright. That answer sets a measure for everyone who serves Him.

In reply to their questioning, the Lord shows us how blessed the path was that He walked. He says, "My food is to do the will of Him that sent Me, and to finish His work." Here was One who met all the sorrows of earth and the trials of the way. Through it all, one object held Him up: doing the will of the Father. His way was perfect. Seeing that, we may well ask our own hearts what motives keep us going day by day. If we are honest with ourselves, will we not have to admit that at best our motives are very mixed?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

That is why bodily hunger did not rule Him at that moment:

The servants of God get hungry and tired as well as other men. Even the Son of God sat in weariness on the well of Sychar while His disciples went into the town to buy food. But the spiritual rises above the physical. The immediate needs of the body are forgotten when powerful spiritual interests are at work.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Question. The disciples ask each other, not Him, whether someone brought Him food. Their question is about the body; His mind is on the harvest.

- Pattern. They repeat the woman's mistake: she heard "water" and thought of the well; they hear "food" and think of a meal.

- Cause. They did not yet have the Spirit, so the size of the harvest He saw was out of their reach.

- Answer. No one had brought Him anything. His food was the faith of sinners, which His closest companions could not buy or carry.

- Standard. He names it Himself: doing the Father's will. That single motive sustained Him, and it measures the mixed motives that sustain us.

John 4:34 · Darby

Jesus says to them, My food is that I should do the will of him that has sent me, and that I should finish his work.

The disciples urge Jesus to eat, and He answers by speaking of a food they know nothing about. His reply shows what kept Him going, and what true service is.

Two lessons at one well

The chapter holds two conversations, and each has its own pupil. One writer sets them side by side:

The woman had learnt her lesson — that the Christ had come; the disciples were to learn theirs — the spirit in which true service should be performed, as illustrated by the example of the Master Himself. His answer, "I have food to eat that you do not know about," told of something they had not brought, that gave Him support.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Food they did not know about

Why call it "food"? The word names what carried Him through the day, as bread carries us:

Where did it lie? Not merely in outward acts of service. What a character these words give His whole path! His food, the very sustenance of His life, was in carrying out the Father's will.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

The verse is sometimes quoted in a longer form. One writer objects, because the words as they stand point to something deeper than obedience:

How humbling to find His disciples at such a time occupied with the body and its wants. And this the Lord makes them feel by His answer. They did not yet know such food, disciples though they were. People often quote it as "His meat and His drink." That is not what He said. Beyond doing His will and completing His work, there was an inner spring of loving and delighting in His Father. But this was His food.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The will of Him who sent Me

He speaks as one sent. That is a chosen position, not a limitation forced on Him:

As Son, He had the divine right to exercise His own will. But having come into Manhood, He took the place that belongs to man — subjection to His Father's will. He found His sustenance and pleasure in carrying out the will of His Father. He had just been making that will known in relation to worship. What joy there was for the Son in bringing the Father's grace to sinners! And what joy for the Father in seeing His Son make His will known and fulfil it!

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

That same fixed purpose ran the whole length of His life. Nothing bent it:

Satan tempted Him with "the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them." It failed completely to influence His thoughts or His movements. The Pharisees showed envy and scorn. The Sadducees mocked Him with their materialism. His brothers did not believe Him. Crowds gave Him passing praise and wanted to make Him a king. None of it turned Him aside from His steadfast path of unswerving devotion to the will of God.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

The work He came to finish

He does not only speak of doing a will; He speaks of completing a work. The conversation just ended shows part of what that work contained:

Jesus had come to work in this world, as He said in John 4. Now He says, "I have finished the work which You gave me to do." His words in chapter 4 show that His work included securing a company of worshippers for the Father, who would worship Him in spirit and in truth. For this the cross was necessary. Every barrier that kept His own from full blessing had to go.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Sustained, not driven by results

He felt joy when one sinner's heart opened. But that joy was not the fuel:

Was He indifferent to results? Far from it. But perfect Servant, as perfect in everything else, His food was to do the will of Him who sent Him, and to finish His work. True, in doing it He must have had joy — a joy we cannot measure. He saw one poor sinner's heart opened up by His teaching, like a flower opening under the warmth of the sun. He knew that the blessing given to her would bear fruit for many a soul in that city. But His food lay elsewhere.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

What it asks of us

Good intentions and hard work are not the same as service. The difference is who sets the task:

It is not enough to act even with a right motive, if we are acting simply on our own initiative and doing what seems right in our own eyes. A man employed in a workshop may be a good workman, but a poor servant. Service, then, is not just work. It is not even good work, or Christian activity of the most scriptural sort. It is such activity under the direction of the Lord.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

One writer turns that to our own motives:

If we are honest with ourselves, must we not admit that our motives are very mixed at best? And yet, how much simpler our lives would be if we realised, in our little measure, that the Father has a will about us and a plan for us. Then our one desire would be to do the Father's will and finish the work He has given us to do.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Food, not duty. Obedience was not a burden He carried but the sustenance of His life — what He lived on, as we live on bread.

- Sent, therefore subject. As Son He had every right to His own will; as Man He took the place of subjection to the One who sent Him.

- Will before results. He rejoiced when one sinner's heart opened, yet His food lay elsewhere. Faithfulness never rose or fell with visible fruit.

- Work to be finished. The work begun at the well ran on to the cross. Only there did every barrier fall, so the Father could have His worshippers.

- The pattern for us. Service is not activity of our own choosing. It is activity under His direction — and the Father has a will and a plan for each of us to finish.

John 4:35 · Darby

Do not ye say, that there are yet four months and the harvest comes? Behold, I say to you, Lift up your eyes and behold the fields, for they are already white to harvest.

Jesus had just spoken with a Samaritan woman at a well. Now He sets two clocks side by side for His disciples: the farmer's calendar, with four months still to run, and a harvest of souls ready that very hour.

What Jesus Was Looking At

Jesus was not making a general point about the world. Something in front of Him prompted the words.

While He sat by the well the Lord had ministered to one poor woman's soul. But now it seems He lifted up His eyes and saw the people streaming out of the city to meet Him. He drew the disciples' attention to the sight. God's blessing on the soil to produce an abundant harvest was still four months away. Yet there was a harvest to reap at once. It came from seed sown long before, which had sprouted and was now ripening fast in the presence of Him who will one day appear to Israel in their land as the "Sun of Righteousness."

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Two Calendars

The saying about four months belonged to fields the disciples could measure. The Lord points them to another crop, one that never has an off-season.

First, the Lord would engage us with the spiritual harvest, and not the natural. If the disciples were to reap the natural harvest they would have to wait four months. The spiritual need is always present.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Fields Outside the Fence

The startling part is where the ripe grain stood. Samaria was not on the disciples' map of God's work.

He then showed them, as already white for harvest, fields their faith had never surveyed. They knew of no fields except those once divided among the tribes. In their view God's farming had to stay inside that sacred fence. Samaria, they judged, was now outside it, nothing but an unclean place. But there was a secret with God. It was the Son of God, the Saviour of sinners, who had now gone out with seed. His toil had prepared a harvest for the reapers on the defiled plains of Samaria... The harvest in Judea was plenteous, but in Samaria it was ripe for the reapers.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Why the Fields Were White

If ripeness means readiness, what had made these people ready? It was not their goodness.

Whatever the times and seasons of the natural harvest, the fields spiritually were ripe for the reaper. Man, the world, deserved judgment. But the very state of sin that calls for judgment is the state God uses for His call of grace. The gospel comes on the ground of man's total ruin, so it levels all distinctions. Jew, Samaritan, Gentile — what is any of them now but a sinner?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Reaping That Followed

The disciples who heard this were slow to act on it. Someone else gathered the Samaritan harvest later.

They may speak of harvest being four months away. No doubt the great harvest of the coming kingdom can only come in God's time. But for those who have eyes to see, the fields were already white for harvest. Thirsty souls were ready for the water of the word of God, and only needed someone to find them... Yet none of them seemed ready to respond, even after the Spirit of God had come at Pentecost; and Philip... with a fervent gospel heart, goes to Samaria first to reap a bountiful harvest (Acts 8).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Reading the Field You Are In

Looking takes discernment, because no two fields are alike.

Fresh from Judea, where they had enjoyed no reaping, they found at Sychar a crop ready for the sickle. The Samaritans had been taught to expect the Messiah, so once they knew of Him they were willing to receive Him. To have tried to reap in Judea would have been labour with little return. To have started sowing at Sychar would have shown a lack of discernment about the condition of souls in that city... The work in one place is no measure of what the work in another should be. And a labourer greatly blessed in one place cannot assume the next field will be ready for his sickle too.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Within Reach of Your Eyes

Jesus tells them to raise their eyes, not to travel.

Our Lord said, "Lift up your eyes, and see that the fields are white for harvest." The opportunities are not far off. They are within reach of our eyes. Never was there a day when it was more urgent that opportunities should be grasped.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Look up. The disciples were watching the calendar. Jesus was watching people walk out of Sychar toward Him.

- Look now. The natural crop needed four more months. The need of souls is always present, so there is nothing to wait for.

- Look wider. The ripe field lay in Samaria, a place the disciples had ruled out of God's farming.

- Look honestly. Ruin is what ripens a field. The state that deserves judgment is the state grace uses, and it puts Jew, Samaritan and Gentile in one class: sinners.

- Look near. The opportunity is within reach of your eyes. Read each field for itself: Sychar was ripe, Judea was not, and Philip reaped Samaria later.

John 4:36 · Darby

He that reaps receives wages and gathers fruit unto life eternal, that both he that sows and he that reaps may rejoice together.

The disciples come back with food while the Samaritan woman's town streams out toward Jesus. He turns them from lunch to a ripe harvest, and names three things: the reaper's pay, the fruit he gathers, and a joy shared with workers who never saw the crop.

Why Reaping, Not Sowing

The wage here goes to the reaper, not the sower. One writer finds that striking.

It is remarkable that the Lord speaks here about reaping rather than sowing. Sowing, of course, goes on, and has its place elsewhere, as in Matthew 13. In earlier times it was sowing rather than reaping. Now, in this day of grace, reaping is what marks the time — fruit not only of God's past dealings, but of His coming and mighty work.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So who did the sowing? It happened long before this day.

The prophets had worked (the woman was expecting the Christ), and so had John the Baptist. The disciples were only reaping, but the fields were white for harvest. In the very worst times, even when judgment is close at hand, God has His good part. Faith sees it and takes comfort in it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Wages

The reaper already draws pay. One writer says the pay comes in two stages.

The wages: the first instalment comes in this world, through fellowship in service with the great Worker Himself. The servants will receive the full reward in glory.

Modernised from R. EvansOriginal wording

The full reward belongs to a coming day, and to more workers than the twelve.

For their work, the disciples would receive their wages. They would value that reward highly. John showed the same in his letter to the elect lady and her children, when he wrote, "Watch yourselves, so that you may not lose what we have worked for, but may win a full reward" (2 John 8). This reward they will have from Christ in the day of His glory in having part with Him in His kingdom. These "wages" are not for the twelve alone, but for all who serve our Lord Jesus in faithfulness here below.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Fruit for Eternal Life

The fruit gathered is not a thing. It is people.

The fruit reaped for eternal life is people. The labours of the Lord's servants bring them to enjoy the blessings of eternal life. Here the fruit is gathered in. Soon those won for Christ's glory will be on display in that day, even as Paul wrote, "For what is our hope or joy or crown of boasting before our Lord Jesus at his coming? Is it not you? For you are our glory and joy" (1 Thess. 2:19-20).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Set that beside ordinary work, and the contrast is sharp:

The fruit of this service is lasting. For his natural labour, man only secures the things that perish in the using. In this spiritual service the labourer "gathers fruit to eternal life."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Sower Is Not Forgotten

Harvest is visible; ploughing is not. People credit whoever holds the sickle, and the Lord corrects that instinct.

How ready men are to judge a worker's usefulness by the apparent results of his work! How ready they are, at harvest time, to treat the reapers as the one and only class of labourers who have worked the soil! Not so the Lord. He knows who have broken up the ground and sown the seed in the sunless days of autumn and winter, or in the windy days of spring. And when the harvest is reaped and gathered into the barn, He will remember them. He will acknowledge the share they have had in the work carried on for Him on earth.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Rejoicing Together

One writer argues that this joy must include the Lord Himself, since He is both sower and reaper.

Then all will know in power that He was the beginner, sustainer, and end of all true service, uniting in Himself the two characters of sower and reaper. This rejoicing together of sowers and reapers must include Himself. "Rejoice together" — what would that mean apart from Him? Your work may be sowing only, and that is not as pleasant as reaping. But if it is His will, His Spirit in us will say, "Yes, Father, for such was your gracious will." Soon it will be eternal joy together in the rest above.

Modernised from R. EvansOriginal wording

That reshapes how a servant chooses his work — whether to aim at what pays off now or at what pays off then.

If we work for the present we may reap our own harvest, but it will be a poor one. If we sow for the glory that is to come, if we sow by faith, others will reap it — but we shall rejoice together.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Season — this day of grace is a time for reaping, not sowing; the prophets and John the Baptist put the seed in long before.

- Wages — the reaper draws his first pay now; Christ gives the full reward in the day of His glory, to every faithful servant and not the twelve alone.

- Fruit — he gathers people into eternal life; ordinary work secures only what perishes in the using.

- Memory — men credit the reaper, but the Lord knows who broke up the ground in the sunless months. He will acknowledge their share.

- Together — the joy waits so that sower, reaper and the Lord Himself share it. So sow by faith for the coming glory, even if someone else reaps.

John 4:37 · Darby

For in this is [verified] the true saying, It is one who sows and another who reaps.

Here the Lord quotes an everyday farming proverb. He uses it to explain a harvest the disciples had done nothing to produce. Who deserves the credit for such a harvest? And what does the Lord think of the worker whose part never shows?

The proverb behind the harvest

The saying rests on the gap between planting and gathering. Seed goes in long before grain comes out, and in spiritual work the two jobs usually fall to different hands.

But the one who reaps will gain by it, in fact gathering fruit in view of the life that is eternal, in contrast to mere natural gain (v. 36). Then when the reaping is done, both sower and reaper have cause to rejoice together. For the sowing is done generally long before the reaping, and in regard to the word of God planted in souls, it is very commonly done by a different worker than the reaper (v. 37).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Sowing that looks like waste

The first half of the work can look like pure loss.

"One sows and another reaps." The man who does the first part of the work seems to be wasting his time and throwing valuable seeds away on the ground. They sink in, and the black soil covers them. They fall into the ground and die. Often the sower dies too in neglect and poverty; and he and his work are forgotten.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The one who gathers is not the one who did most.

So we would judge wrongly if we thought the reaper had done all the work, just because we see him carrying in the sheaves. We must not forget the sad efforts of his dead fellow worker, which at the time seemed fruitless and hopeless. One man ends his course in complete failure; another wins success. But if each works as God calls him, the work is one, and one God is over it all.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Who had sown at Sychar

The Samaritan woman already expected a coming Christ before Jesus spoke to her. Someone had put that expectation there.

We may note that the reapers gathered fruit for eternal life, and also received their wages. The prophets had laboured — the woman was expecting the Christ — and John the Baptist had laboured too. The disciples were only reaping, but the fields were white for harvest. Even in the very worst times, when judgment is close at hand, God has His own good part, and faith sees it and takes comfort from it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Some of those sowers cannot be named at all — and that is part of the comfort.

Who kept that expectation alive in the hearts of the Samaritans, by teaching them what the Scriptures said? We cannot now tell. The disciples in their day probably knew almost as little about it as we do. But whoever the Lord meant, He wants us to understand this: He overlooks neither their names nor their work.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

A word that checks the reaper's pride

The Lord's words to the apostles guard them against pride.

I take the words "I sent" as marking their character: as apostles, this is your work; do not be proud, or wise in your own eyes. I have sent you to reap what you did no work for. Others — for our Lord did not take the honour to Himself alone — other men have laboured, and you have entered into their labours. But our Lord's joy was in the harvest, in what would be brought in. Their joy in it was softened by remembering who had sown the seed.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Reaping is the character of this day

Sowing still goes on, but writers note that the Lord points His servants here to gathering rather than planting.

It is striking that the Lord speaks here about reaping rather than sowing. Sowing, of course, still goes on, and has its place elsewhere, as in Matthew 13. In earlier times the work was sowing more than reaping. Now, in this day of grace, reaping is what marks the work — fruit not only of God's past dealings, but of His coming and mighty work.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same principle reaches to anyone who has received truth through others' costly work.

We can take no glory to ourselves. "Other men laboured, and you are entered into their labours" (John 4:38) can most truly be said of us, though I fear we have but little availed ourselves of the rich field of blessing laid open to us through their faithful service.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

The joy is held back so it can be shared

So how should we work, whichever half of the job falls to us?

Are we called to sow? Then let us work on without losing heart, even if we never see the fruit of our labour. Are we allowed to reap? Then let us work hard, remembering the responsibility that rests on us. But let us always keep in mind that in a coming day others may share the joy of that harvest which the Lord in His goodness has allowed us to reap.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Two hands, one work. Planting and gathering usually fall to different people at different times. Yet God counts it one work, with Himself over it all.

- The hidden sower. The first worker often dies with nothing to show for it. The Lord still knows his name, and forgets no work that no human record kept.

- The visible reaper. Whoever gathers works ground he never broke. So success calls for humility, not pride.

- The present work. The prophets and John the Baptist had sown. The disciples were sent to reap, and reaping still marks this day of grace.

- The shared joy. In a coming day the sower and the reaper share the joy of the harvest. So no one should work only for results he can see.

John 4:38 · Darby

I have sent you to reap that on which ye have not laboured; others have laboured, and ye have entered into their labours.

Jesus has just spoken with a Samaritan woman at a well. Now He tells His disciples where they stand: they are reaping a harvest they did not begin.

His Sending, His Timing

The verse opens with a commission, not an invitation. One writer explains what sowing and reaping are, and who decides which one you do.

To sow is to spread faithfully whatever testimony God has entrusted to His servants for that day. To reap is to gather in souls by ministry as the fruit of the seed sown. But who are to reap, and when? This the Lord decides, and here He allots to the disciples their portion of work in the field. "I sent you." Their commission came from Him. He never makes a mistake, and He did not send them into the field before the crop was ready.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Others Who Laboured

The Samaritan woman already had a hope she had not invented. Someone had put it there.

"I sent you to reap that for which you did not labor." In earlier times the Lord's servants had borne their testimony, and the disciples were entering into the fruit of their work. The prophets had testified of the Messiah. That is how this poor Samaritan woman had heard about Him, and it had stirred her heart. "When he comes," she says, "he will tell us all things."

Modernised from R. EvansOriginal wording

Commentators differ on who those earlier workers were. One writer sees the Lord's own labour at the well as the sowing that made the field ready.

The Lord had borne the toil of the sower. Tired and worn out, He had talked with the woman. But now He would share the joy of the harvest with His disciples.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

A Warning Against Pride

Reaping is the visible half of the work, and that makes it risky. One writer hears the Lord's words as a warning to the very men He was sending.

"I sent you" I take to be characteristic. As apostles, this is your office. Do not be proud, or wise in your own eyes. I sent you to reap that for which you did not labor. Others have labored — and our Lord did not take the honour to Himself alone — and you have entered into their labor. The one who is lowest, and works for fruit he cannot see, is highest. He is more truly doing the will of the One who sent him, in simple faith. Success gives immediate support, even to the weak.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Reaping Rather Than Sowing

Earlier ages were marked more by sowing. One writer explains why the Lord speaks of reaping here.

It is remarkable that the Lord speaks about reaping now rather than sowing. Sowing, of course, goes on, and has its place elsewhere, as in Matthew 13. In the past there was more sowing than reaping. Now, in this day of grace, reaping marks the time — fruit not only of God's past dealings, but of His own coming and mighty work... These differences remain. Even so, the apostles are marked by reaping rather than by sowing, and so, of course, are other labourers. Everyone knows how clearly this proved true at Pentecost and afterwards.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Every Harvest Owed to Others

One writer applies this to every preacher who has ever seen results in the Lord's work.

No preacher of the gospel has ever gone out to serve the Lord, had success in his work, and been able to say it was all the result of his own prayers and his own service. No servant worth his salt would ever say such a thing. He would admit that every success he had in the Lord's service came because others were praying and others had worked in some way. He and they were working together to secure this fruit for God. We are not all called to be sowers, and we are not all called to be reapers. But we can all do some small service, and we can all plant some seed. Every word spoken for the Lord is seed sown. Every kind act shown to a believer or an unbeliever is seed sown.

Modernised from Frank WallaceOriginal wording

The Hidden Sower's Reward

The verse could sting anyone who sowed for years and saw nothing. It does the opposite.

Many prophets and righteous men had wanted to see what the disciples saw, but never lived to see their day. Will they lose their joy? No. They will see the day of Christ's glory, and the crop that grew from the seed they sowed in patience and under hardship — sowing known perhaps only to themselves and to God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent — the commission, the field, and the timing all come from Him; He does not send reapers into a crop that is not ready.

- Sown — prophets and earlier servants had kept the hope of the Messiah alive before the disciples ever came.

- Shared — no worker's success is his own; others prayed and laboured for the fruit he gathers.

- Sobered — the reaper's warning is pride; the one who works lowest, for fruit he cannot see, is highest.

- Settled — every sower who died without seeing a harvest will see the crop in the day of Christ's glory.

John 4:39 · Darby

But many of the Samaritans of that city believed on him because of the word of the woman who bore witness, He told me all things that I had ever done.

Jesus had left Judea, where the religious leaders had turned hostile, and He stopped at a well outside a Samaritan town. There He told a woman her whole life story, and her one sentence about it turned a crowd of her neighbours toward Him — so what makes a testimony work, and how far can faith go when it rests on someone else's word?

Grace redirected, not stopped

Jesus was in Samaria because Judea had turned hostile. One writer sees in that move what rejected grace does next.

Here the circumstances are completely different. For the moment the Lord is outside the circle of Judaism, among the despised Samaritans. Why? Because of the hostility in the Jewish heart... There He met the woman and brought blessing to her soul, and that brought blessing to many others too. If some reject His grace, their unbelief does not dry the channel up; it redirects it, and others receive it.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Samaritans were a despised people. That a whole town of them believed turned every expectation around.

So despised Samaria stretches out her hands to God, and Galilee, the land of darkness and of the shadow of death, receives Him when Jerusalem rejects Him. The light springs up in the place of darkness. It may be rejected elsewhere, but it is never hidden — except in judgment.

Modernised from R. EvansOriginal wording

The words she repeated

Her whole message was that He had read her life. Notice what she chose to tell people: not that she was innocent, but that she had been found out.

Here again she testifies that His word searched her conscience: "He told me all that I ever did." When a person does not shrink from that kind of examination, it is a good guarantee that the work is Divine. Otherwise grace is easily misused as a cover for sin, or as a light way of dealing with a sinner, instead of judging everything in God's light.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the shame was gone

A woman found out like that would usually hide. Something had taken the sting out of it.

A new object has been revealed to her soul — Christ — and it takes up her whole mind. It takes her up so completely that, without thinking, she becomes a preacher: she proclaims the Lord out of a full heart and with perfect simplicity. He had told her everything she had ever done. At that moment she is not thinking about what it was. Jesus had told it to her, and the thought of Jesus takes away the bitterness of the sin. The sense of His goodness removes the deceit in the heart that tries to hide its sin. In short, her heart is completely filled with Christ Himself.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The messenger God chose

No miracle happened in that town. Look at who carried the message, and at what God chose not to use.

In His grace God uses, not an angel, but a sinner born again, to carry the truth to others, as we see here in Samaria... It was a true work of God, done in the ordinary way of grace: the word dealing with the conscience. There was no miracle, and no persuasive words of human wisdom either, but a demonstration of the Spirit, so that their faith would stand in God's power.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

She never claimed an office. She said what she knew and attached it to a Person.

She told what she knew; she testified of that which she had found, but in connection with a Person. "He told me," she declared, so pointing others to that One who, in grace, had met with her at the well. But how effectively she did her work! The fields were white to harvest... To stand up and preach was not her work... Yet she worked rightly and well, and that without intruding into another's sphere.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Believing on her word — and then past it

These townspeople believed because of someone else's report — faith at second hand.

The power of Jesus' testimony in the conscience is the great doorway into the knowledge of Jesus... Many believed because of this testimony, even at second hand. This is what opened the way for Him, and on that ground they begged Him to stay with them... Her word was the doorway; but once He was let in, everything fits the full glory of the One the heart is now taught to receive.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

She wanted exactly that, and would not have settled for less.

She could not be satisfied with only telling them what she had heard, or who she had seen and talked with. She wanted others to meet Him for themselves... A true spiritual instinct led her to bring them to Christ, as the one thing that would settle their souls in the truth about Him.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Diverted — Rejection in Judea did not stop grace. It turned the stream toward a despised town, and light rose where there had been darkness.

- Exposed — Her one line was that He knew everything about her. When a person does not flinch from that, it is good evidence the work is God's, and that grace is not covering up sin.

- Filled — She can tell her own story because her heart is full of Christ. The thought of Jesus takes the bitterness out of the sin.

- Sent — God used a sinner, not an angel. There was no miracle and no clever speech, so their faith would rest on God's power.

- Surpassed — Her word was the doorway, not the resting place. She wanted them to meet Him for themselves, and everything they found in Him agreed with His full glory.

John 4:40 · Darby

When therefore the Samaritans came to him they asked him to abide with them, and he abode there two days.

The Samaritans were a people others looked down on. Yet when they came out to meet Jesus, they asked Him to stay — and He stayed two days. Two questions follow. Why did He accept? And what did those two days do for them?

A request no one else made

Others met Jesus and asked Him to leave. These people asked the opposite.

The Samaritans begged the Son of God to stay with them, and there He did stay two days (v. 40). What confidence on their part! What grace on His! Others, more favoured, who looked down on them, begged Him with one voice to leave them (Luke 8:37). Who else is ever recorded as making such a request for His presence? But those who asked received a blessing both now and forever, as faith in Him always does.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

He came because He was invited

He had not pushed Himself on the town. He sat at the well, and He entered only when they asked.

Jews had no dealings with the Samaritans. But this was the time of gift and grace. The message went out to those counted worthless too. Jesus did not go to offer Himself to them, though He went when they invited Him. As He said, "Enter no town of the Samaritans." Yet the glory that was in Him, and what He was conscious of in the character and heart of God, went beyond His present ministry.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why He was at ease among them

He stayed two days among a people counted defiled, and He showed no reserve. What made Him free there was what He found in them.

In Samaria He sat at the well with one of the defiled nation, and afterwards stayed for two days among many of them. Conscience was stirred there, and so He is among them without reserve. There is no weight on His spirit. He was in His right place. That place gave Him the opportunity to act from Himself, and to let people learn what He was and why He had come into this world. He found a home in Samaria, because He found stirred consciences there — contrite, humbled hearts.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Faith with no miracle to lean on

No miracle happened there. Yet they came to know who He was.

So without a miracle Samaria acknowledged the Lord. One person first knew Him as a prophet. In the end all who believed there knew Him as Saviour of the world. The fullest confession of His grace came where you would expect the least understanding. But faith gives a new wisdom. It is so different from the old that the wise must become fools if they would be wise according to God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the two days gave them

The woman had brought them a report. The two days turned that report into their own knowledge. They also settled an old argument about which mountain was the right place to worship.

She had learnt from Him who He was. They had learnt from His two days' stay with them what He was, as meeting their need on the broad ground of grace. Here every question about whether Gerizim was better than Moriah fell away. Everything they had argued about in the ritual of Moses must have appeared in a new light. The Saviour of the world had come, had sat with them, had taught them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A picture in the timing

Some commentators read the two days as more than a detail of the itinerary — they see the shape of the present age in it, though this is offered as a suggestion rather than a stated fact of the text.

We should consider well here that it was not His miracles that drew them to Him, but His word. First came His words to the woman, which she testified to, then His own direct word to them. No doubt these two days picture the present age of grace to sinners of every class, Jews and Gentiles.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Asked — Others begged Him to leave; this town begged Him to stay. He never forces His company, but He goes where people want Him.

- Stayed — He came in when they invited Him. He was at home there, because stirred consciences and humbled hearts gave Him a place to be Himself.

- Spoke — No miracle happened in Samaria. Faith came through His word alone — first carried by the woman, then heard first-hand.

- Known — She had learnt who He was. The two days taught them what He was: grace that met their need and ended the old quarrel over the right mountain.

- Blessed — Those who asked for His presence received a blessing now and forever. Faith in Him always receives it.

John 4:41 · Darby

And more a great deal believed on account of his word;

The woman's report brought a crowd of Samaritans out of the town to meet Jesus, and they asked Him to stay. Verse 41 records the result: a second, larger wave of faith — this time from hearing Him.

From her word to His

The count rises from "many" who believed her report to "many more" who believed Him. One writer sees God honouring her testimony, and sees real faith moving past the messenger to the Lord Himself.

It is cheering to see how God honoured the simple testimony of the woman. Many out of that town believed on Him because of her word... But faith, whenever it is real, rises from the instrument to Him who graciously chooses to use it, and God loves to put honour upon the word of Jesus Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why there was more to hear

Those two extra days were their own idea. One writer sets their asking beside others who asked Him to leave.

The Samaritans asked the Son of God to stay with them, and there He did stay two days (v. 40). What confidence on their part! What grace on His! Others more favoured, who despised them, asked Him with one voice to leave them (Luke 8:37). Where else do we read of anyone asking for His presence like this? But those who asked received a blessing both now and forever, as faith in Him always does.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No miracle, only words

Their faith had nothing to do with miracles. It grew from two rounds of speaking — hers, then His.

We should think carefully here. They were not drawn to Him by His miracles, but by His word. First came His words to the woman, which she then told them about. Then came His own direct word to them. No doubt His two days with them are a picture of the present age of grace to sinners of every class, Jews and Gentiles. "And many more believed because of His word" (v. 41). The fruit of His word becomes abundant indeed.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Believing Him, not merely believing about Him

One kind of faith follows miracles. Another rests on the person Himself. The same writer sets the two side by side.

At the feast of the Passover... many believed in His name. But it was because of His miraculous signs. The various people mentioned in Chapter 1 are a clear contrast. They held to the Lord Jesus because of what they saw in Him. The moral beauty of His own person, His truth and His grace drew their hearts. Or others later at Samaria... He had done no miracles there, but His word had penetrated their hearts: they believed Him, not simply believing certain things about Him.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

What the woman was aiming at

The town already believed because of what she said. That was not enough for her.

She had learned for herself the value of meeting Christ in person. She wanted the same for the people of her town, so she urged them to come and see the man who had told her everything she ever did. She could not rest satisfied with simply telling them what she had heard, or whom she had seen. She wanted others to meet Him for themselves. They came, though at first they believed in Him because of what the woman said. She would not let them settle for less than meeting Him, and they did not settle for less.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The pattern for everyone since

Nobody today hears Christ speak in person as these Samaritans did. One writer reads this moment as a picture of how anyone believes now.

This was the simple and blessed fact for these Samaritans. It beautifully foreshadows the true and unchangeable ground of faith for all who would hear and believe the gospel once the Lord was no longer here on earth in person. Anyone and anything may stop a soul in its tracks with revealed truth: a man, a woman, a child; a sermon, a conversation, a book or a leaflet. But whatever the means, the soul believes God. Without believing God there is no true faith, and no divine authority and grace over heart and conscience.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Word, not wonder. No miracle happened in that town. The many more believed because His word reached them, and the fruit was abundant.

- Instrument, then Person. God honoured the woman's testimony, but real faith rises from the messenger to the One who used her.

- Asked and received. Others asked Him to leave; these asked Him to stay. Those two extra days of His own words produced the many more of verse 41.

- Him, not facts about Him. Earlier crowds believed because of miraculous signs. Here they believed Him — not just certain things about Him.

- Your turn to hear. A sermon, a book, a conversation may stop anyone in their tracks — but real faith is the soul believing God for itself.

John 4:42 · Darby

and they said to the woman, [It is] no longer on account of thy saying that we believe, for we have heard him ourselves, and we know that this is indeed the Saviour of the world.

Jesus spent two days in the Samaritan town of Sychar, and the people there said something no Jew of that day would say. This verse raises two questions: what happens when borrowed belief becomes personal, and how a despised village came to call Jesus the Saviour of the world.

From the messenger to the Master

Her story brought them out to Jesus; His own word kept them there.

Faith, whenever it is real, rises from the instrument to Him who is pleased to use it, and God loves to put honour upon the word of Jesus Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The aim of her witness

She had not simply passed on information. She had pushed them toward a meeting she could not arrange for them.

She could not be content to tell them only what she had heard, whom she had seen, and whom she had talked with. She wanted others to meet Him for themselves. They did so. Short of that she would not have them rest; short of that they did not stop. A true spiritual instinct made her bring them to Christ. That was what would settle their souls in the truth about Him.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Not a snub

Their words could have stung her. One writer reads her reaction the other way:

Nothing could have been more welcome to the woman of Samaria than the words of the many who believed because of His own word. They told her plainly that they no longer believed because of what she said, for they had heard Him themselves. Nature might take that as a snub, but grace in her would give the saying a loud Amen.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Her confession and theirs

Some old copies of John read "the Christ, the Saviour of the world" here. Commentators judge those two words a copyist's addition. Leave them out, and two confessions stand side by side:

Here the words "the Christ" should be omitted. Her testimony was that He was the Christ; theirs, that He was the Saviour of the world. She had learnt from His lips who He was. They learnt from His two days' stay among them what He was, as meeting their need on the broad ground of divine grace. Their faith about Him now rested on a firm basis, and they held this title firmly in their hearts — "the Saviour of the world." He could be their Saviour, for He was the Saviour of the world.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

A title no Jew was saying

Gerizim was the mountain where the Samaritans worshipped. The wider name for Christ came from them, not from people with a religious standing to defend.

Notice too that the Samaritans call Jesus "the Saviour." At bottom they knew very well that their Gerizim was nothing. But grace opened their hearts to a wider idea of the Saviour's work. No Jew would have said, "the Saviour of the world."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

No sign, no wonder — only His word

Nothing spectacular happened in Sychar. There was no healing and no miracle. Jesus simply talked with them for two days.

So the Samaritans believed without a miracle, and entered into the blessing all the more deeply. They take their own place: not a word of rivalry with the Jew. They were sinners: Jesus is the Saviour. They were of the world. But "this is indeed the Saviour of the world." God saves us, not because we deserve it, but because He, Jesus, deserves it; and we believe on Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The question the verse puts to the reader

The villagers' words are also a test. Borrowed conviction is a starting point, not a resting place.

Have you, my friend, heard Him for yourself? And do you know indeed that He is the Christ, the Saviour of the world, and therefore your Saviour? One thing is certain: if you know beyond doubt that you have heard the Lord's own word, then you have heard Him.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Instrument. Her word brought them out; real faith always rises from the messenger to the One who used the messenger.

- Meeting. She refused to let them stop at her report — she wanted them face to face with Christ, and that meeting settled their souls.

- Hearing. No miracle happened in Sychar. Two days of His own word carried them past her report.

- Widening. She said "the Christ." They went wider: "the Saviour of the world." No Jew of that day would say it, and it came from people with nothing to boast in.

- Yours. The verse turns their question back on you: have you heard Him yourself? Is He therefore your Saviour?