:

He that believes on the Son has life eternal, and he that is not subject to the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides upon him.

Read Full Chapter

Commentary for this Verse

This chapter ends by dividing the whole human race in two. The dividing line is a Person. Everything turns on what a person does with the Son. Commentators press hard on three words: "has," "does not obey," and "remains."

(The writers below quote an older translation, which reads "believes not" where the ESV has "does not obey," and "abides" for "remains.")

Two outcomes, no third option

The verse offers no middle ground:

Now we come to the result, as far as man is concerned, of the presence and work of Christ on earth, and of the going out of all in gospel testimony… For all it must be either the life or the wrath. The blessing cannot be had without faith in the Person in whom the blessing is.

James Boyd

Why the Son decides it

The reason lies in what the Father has given the Son:

Further, as Son the Father loves Him, and has put all into His hand… He is set up as God's testimony, with God's words from heaven, from where He came… Eternal life and wrath depend on His being believed in or the contrary.

J. N. Darby

"Has" — a possession, not a promise

Earlier in the chapter the wording is that the believer should have eternal life. Here the tense changes, and the change matters:

If the word in John 3:15-16 is that the one who believes should have eternal life, it is very definite in John 3:36 of the same chapter that the believer on the Son has eternal life… We do not have to wait until we get to heaven to receive this divine life, or to learn whether it is ours. We have it now, and God's word assures us that we have it now.

An Outline of Sound Words

What unbelief means here

What kind of unbelief does the verse mean? One writer answers:

The force of "the wrath of God abides on him" is that he has deserved it, and that if he rejects Christ, he lies under it still… In this last verse of the chapter "the wrath of God abides" if they do not bow to Christ's authority. It is not disobeying Him in the details of a command, or anything of that sort; the "believes not" means "is not subject to" Him.

J. N. Darby

Submission to Him is where real obedience starts, not where it ends:

Practical obedience flows from submission to His Person, and proves the reality of the heart-subjection of faith.

William Kelly

"The wrath of God" — not the wrath of the Father

The change of title in the last clause is deliberate. Wrath is never named as the Father's toward His own:

He that believes not the Son — not obeying Him to whom the Father has given all things — "shall not see life, but the wrath… of God." Not the wrath of the Father. There is no wrath there, not an atom, but perfect fullness of blessing, of love. He is Father, always Father, and nothing but Father in love and perfectness: "the Father loves the Son."

J. N. Darby

The weight of the word "remains"

This verse closes two doors. One is the idea that everyone is saved in the end. The other is the idea that the lost stop existing:

This verse entirely sets aside the notion of all being restored and eternally saved… It is quite true they shall not see life; but — tremendous fact! — "the wrath of God abides on him." This, beyond all question, flatly contradicts annihilationism. If the wrath of God is to remain on the unbeliever, it is utterly impossible that he can be made an end of. Annihilation and abiding wrath are completely incompatible. We must either erase the word "abiding" from the inspired page, or abandon the notion of annihilation entirely. To hold both is out of the question.

C. H. Mackintosh

Yet this wrath is a present condition, and one thing can still change it:

The unbeliever is "judged already." His whole condition is settled by the very fact that he has rejected the Son of God. The wrath of God, instead of His favour, now rests on him and has become his condition. Only one thing reverses it: his coming to terms with the Son of God before it is too late. Otherwise that wrath becomes his fixed and abiding condition for an eternity without end.

J. A. Trench

Who is speaking?

Commentators differ over whether verses 35-36 continue John the Baptist's testimony or are the evangelist's own comment. One argues from the content itself:

I think the internal evidence is clear that the testimony of John the Baptist closes with verse 34, and that verses 35 and 36 are the comment of the Evangelist. For John's answer from verse 27, however given of God, does not go beyond the measure of his spiritual knowledge, while the closing verses 35 and 36 reflect the deeper and higher truth which the Lord taught His disciples.

The Bible Treasury

Others hold the words are the Baptist's, and one writer notes that the question does not affect their authority — both men spoke by the same Spirit.

Summary

- Person — the verse sorts people by one thing: their response to the Son whom the Father loves and to whom He has given all things.

- Possession — "has" is present tense. The believer holds eternal life now, on the authority of God's word, and does not wait for it in heaven.

- Posture — "does not obey" means refusing to be subject to Him. Real obedience in daily life grows out of that submission and proves it genuine.

- Present wrath — wrath is not only a future warning. It rests on the unbeliever already, and it is God's wrath, never the Father's toward His own.

- Permanence — "remains" rules out both universal salvation and annihilation. Yet the condition can change: a person may still come to terms with the Son before it is too late.