John 12:4–6

John 12:4 · Darby

One of his disciples therefore, Judas [son] of Simon, Iscariote, who was about to deliver him up, says,

At the supper in Bethany, Mary pours her most costly ointment on Jesus and the scent fills the house. Then one of His own disciples breaks in with an objection, and John names him and adds the one fact that explains everything that follows.

The First Words We Hear From Judas

Judas belonged to the twelve disciples from the start, yet this is the first time we hear him speak. One writer traces the line from this scene to the betrayal.

Here someone comes on the scene of whom little has been heard before: Judas Iscariot, that is, a man of Kerioth in Judea. He shared that name with his father, Simon, as John in fact tells us (John 6:71; 13:26). He was one of the twelve, and is always named last in the list, and the only one of them, as far as we know, who was a native of Judea. Until the supper at Bethany, nothing special is recorded of him, though the Lord had in the sixth chapter of John clearly referred to him as a devil. Even then the Lord knew his character and his terrible treachery in full. But circumstances had to bring out what was within. Here in the house of Simon the leper he opened his mouth for the first time we read of (John 12:4), and the rebuke he received from the Lord was what pushed him into his treachery.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Love Poured Out, Deceit Exposed

Mary's ointment and Judas's objection meet in the same room, moments apart.

Sadly, in the middle of the fragrance of love the deceit of the traitor lies hidden. Jesus is the Light, and in His presence all show their true colours. The act that expressed the love of a devoted saint now exposes the lust of a heartless sinner. Mary is delighted to spend what is "very costly" on the One who is of infinite worth. Judas is coldly calculating the price of the ointment. Three hundred pence was a working man's wage for a year, a sum that would keep a poor household for a year. His one regret is that, under the profession of giving to the poor, he has not been able to add this sum to his own dishonest gains.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Concern for the Poor as a Cover

The objection sounded generous. It was a cover.

Heartless man! Hiding his covetousness under the cloak of caring for the poor. No one can have a true heart for the poor who does not love Christ. Judas — a man who professed faith, an apostle, and all that he was — loved money: sadly, a common enough love. He had no heart for Christ, although he may have preached and cast out demons in His blessed name.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The True Measure of Christ

Behind the arithmetic lies the real issue: what Christ is worth.

All good or evil turns, at bottom, on a true or false estimate of Him. We may be slow — and we are — to learn the lesson, though it matters more than any other... So Judas Iscariot speaks up — one of His disciples, and the man about to give Him up. He asks why the ointment was not sold for three hundred denarii and given to poor people. He never thought of Jesus! Yet Mary's act might naturally have awakened affection. What was He not to her?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Put the two numbers side by side.

Notice that Judas betrayed his Master for one tenth of the value of what Mary lavished on Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

How Far One Man's Words Travelled

The objection did not stop with the man who made it.

John tells us that Judas found fault with Mary's act. Mark says there were "some," and Matthew that the Lord's "disciples" had indignation... John traces the root of this failure to the covetous heart of Judas. It seems his pretended piety and concern for the poor influenced all the disciples. What a contrast! The scent of Mary's ointment filled the house; the evil thought of Judas spread its harmful influence over the hearts of all the disciples!... What a solemn warning! An evil tendency that we feed may grow until it masters us completely. It leads us to commit the most appalling sins, as it did with this man. Covetousness, the love of money, led Judas on step by step, blinding his soul, until he completed his frightful sin by betraying his Lord for thirty pieces of silver.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Light. Jesus is the Light. In His presence everyone shows their true colours: the same ointment revealed Mary's love and Judas's lust.

- Estimate. All good or evil comes down to a true or false estimate of Christ. Judas priced the perfume and never thought of the Person.

- Mask. Concern for the poor was a cloak over covetousness; no one has a true heart for the poor who does not love Christ.

- Spread. Judas's pious-sounding words carried the other disciples with him. The scent of the ointment filled the house; so did his evil thought.

- Warning. An evil tendency we feed grows until it masters us. The man who priced the perfume at a year's wages sold his Master for a tenth of that.

John 12:5 · Darby

Why was this ointment not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor?

Judas speaks up in the middle of a meal of love, and his words sound generous — a large sum, redirected to the poor. John records the question, then tells us what was really behind it — teaching the reader to weigh not just the words but the man who speaks them.

The Sum He Named

Judas knew what the ointment was worth, and he priced it while Mary was still pouring it out.

While Mary is delighted to spend what is "very costly" on the One who is of infinite worth, Judas is coolly calculating the price of the ointment. Three hundred pence was a year's wages for a working man. It was enough to meet the needs of a poor man's household for a year. His one regret is that, under the profession of giving to the poor, he has not been able to add this sum to his unlawful gains.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Set that figure beside the price he later took for his Master.

Notice this: Judas betrayed his Master for one-tenth the value of what Mary lavished on Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Person He Left Out

Judas prices the gift and names a charity. The One in front of him is missing from his own question.

He never thought of Jesus! Yet Mary's act might naturally have awakened affection. What was He not to her? Judas works out the lowest selling price of the nard. He falsely puts poor people forward, though he had no real care for them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Charity As A Disguise

The poor are mentioned, but not loved. Love for the poor and love for Christ cannot be pulled apart.

Heartless man! Hiding his covetousness under the cloak of caring for the poor. No one can have a true heart for the poor who does not love Christ. Judas — a man who professed faith, an apostle, all that he seemed to be — loved money. Sadly, that love is far from rare. He had no heart for Christ, though he may have preached and driven out demons in His blessed name.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

That pose has never gone out of fashion, and believers still fall for it.

He posed as a very practical man, fully aware of the value of solid, material help for the poor. Mary, in his view, was wasting something valuable, moved by silly sentiment. The world is exactly of that opinion today. The religion that suits its taste puts all the emphasis on material and earthly good for people. And today, as much as then, worldly-minded believers readily agree with the world and echo its opinions.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Who Decides What Is Waste

The word "waste" only makes sense once you have decided what something is worth. Judas measured the ointment; the real measurement was of him.

The most that some could say about Mary's act was that it was marked by waste. How little He was in their eyes, when they measured service to Him this way! The true measure of any service is the Person it is done for.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

The same judgment runs through public opinion today. It praises one sort of giving and mocks the other.

How humbling this false judgment of the disciples ought to be to us! They would not have counted it waste if it had been done for the poor. They counted as waste what came from whole-hearted devotion to Christ. This was human nature! And so it still is. Whom does the world applaud? Those who spend their time on charitable and humanitarian projects, while it calls a man a fool for giving up anything for Christ. What the world calls "waste," because it was done for Christ, is precious to God.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

One Voice, And The Lord's Answer

John names one objector, but the complaint did not stop with him. A single greedy heart set the tone for the room.

John traces the root of this failure to the covetous heart of Judas. It seems his pretended piety and concern for the poor influenced all the disciples. What a contrast! The fragrance of Mary's ointment filled the house. The evil thought of Judas spread its harm through the hearts of all the disciples!

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Jesus answers the objection Himself.

The Lord defends Mary: "Leave her alone, so that she may keep it for the day of my burial. For the poor you always have with you, but you do not always have me." Spending energy or resources in worship is no waste. Worship is the most worthy cause there ever was.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Price. Judas valued the ointment at a working man's wages for a year — and later sold Christ Himself for a tenth of it.

- Person. His question counts everything and considers no one. Mary poured out her gift for Jesus, yet Jesus never enters it.

- Pretence. Care for the poor was the cloak, not the motive; no one truly has a heart for the poor who has no heart for Christ.

- Perspective. "Waste" depends on who receives the gift — the worth of the Person is the true measure of the service.

- Poison. One greedy voice infected the whole room. Mary's fragrance filled the house, and so did his complaint.

John 12:6 · Darby

But he said this, not that he cared for the poor, but because he was a thief and had the bag, and carried what was put into [it].

A woman's costly gift has just filled the house with perfume. One voice at the table objects on behalf of the poor. John then tells us what was really behind that objection, and the answer raises the hardest question of the scene: how could a man sit so near to Christ and stay so far from Him?

The Spirit uncovers what the man covered

The objection sounded generous. John's comment takes the mask off, and one writer sets Judas beside Mary, who hid nothing in her worship.

In Judas we have the very reverse of all this. He covers up, and the Spirit of God uncovers, and shows it to us. He did not care for the poor, he cared for the bag, he carried what was put in it. There is no trying to make a good appearance when we have Him before us.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Another writer breaks the objection into its parts: the price, the pretence, and the profit.

Judas makes a cold calculation of the lowest selling price of the nard. He puts poor people forward as a pretence, for he had no real care for them. He would have liked that sum added to his unlawful gains. Nothing is more withering, or more calmly true, than the comment of the Holy Spirit in verse 6.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The moneybag and the stealing

The Greek words behind "moneybag" and "used to help himself" say more than the English shows. Older translations render them as "the bag" and "carried what was put in it."

The word glossokomon does not mean "bag," but a chest (Revised Version margin, "box"); and the verb ebastazen may be rendered "used to take away" (steal).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The theft was quiet enough to go unnoticed by the men who trusted him with the money.

Judas was unfaithful. On the outside he must have been able to make a fair show of honesty. If not, the other disciples would never have trusted him to continue as their treasurer. Still, he could not hide the fact from the Spirit of God. The Spirit puts it on record that he "carried" what was put in the bag. That is, he was a secret thief. The Apostle Paul says that servants should not steal. They should show all good faithfulness, so that they adorn the doctrine of God in all things (Titus 2:10).

Modernised from Scripture QuarterlyOriginal wording

Charity used as a cover

Judas played the practical man against a woman wasting money on sentiment. The world still likes that pose.

Greed ruled Judas, and he had become a thief. He was not only a thief but a hypocrite. He masked his self-seeking by claiming to care for the poor. He posed as a very practical man, wide awake to the value of solid, material benefits for the poor. Mary, in his view, was wasting something valuable, moved by silly sentiment. The world holds exactly that opinion today. The religion that suits its taste puts all the emphasis on material and earthly benefits for people.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Another writer puts the test the other way round. Real care for the poor starts with love for Christ.

Heartless man! hiding his covetousness under the cloak of caring for the poor. No one can have a true heart for the poor who does not love Christ. Judas — a man who professed faith, an apostle, all that he was — loved money, a love that is sadly common. He had no heart for Christ, although he may have preached and cast out demons in His blessed name.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

In the light of Christ

Sitting in the same room as Mary did not make him like her. It made the difference visible.

Sadly, in the middle of the fragrance of love the deceit of the traitor is lurking. Jesus is the Light, and in His presence all are shown in their true colours. What was the expression of the love of a devoted saint becomes the occasion for exposing the desire of a heartless sinner. Three hundred pence was a working man's yearly wage, enough to keep a poor household for a year.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

From greed to betrayal

One writer traces the steps that led from this room to the betrayal.

First came desire. Second came a way to satisfy it: his office as keeper of the bag. All this goes on alongside religion, in the very company of Christ, day after day. Third, he is led on to the final form of his crime, at a time and in circumstances of the greatest blessing to a true disciple. Fourth, his heart is hardened, so that he betrays Him even with a kiss.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The warning is turned on the reader.

What a solemn warning! An evil tendency that we feed may grow until it masters us completely. It can lead us to commit the most appalling sins, as it did with this man.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Uncovered. Judas covered his motive. The Spirit of God uncovered it, in the calmest and most withering comment of the chapter.

- The bag. The word is a chest, and "carried" means he used to take away — he was the trusted treasurer and a secret thief at once.

- The mask. Care for the poor was the cloak; no one truly has a heart for the poor who has no heart for Christ.

- The light. Mary's love did not soften him. It exposed him. In Christ's presence everyone shows their true colours.

- The road. Desire, then an office that fed it, then a hardened heart, then a kiss. An evil we feed can end by mastering us.