Now the feast of the dedication was celebrating at Jerusalem, and it was winter.
John gives both a date and a season: the Lord is in Jerusalem for a festival the law of Moses never commanded, and the weather is cold. Why record a man-made feast at all, and why mention the winter?
This festival was not one of the feasts God appointed in the law. It remembered the day the temple was cleansed after a foreign king had defiled it.
A yearly feast celebrating the dedication of the temple by Judas Maccabeus after Antiochus Epiphanes polluted it, 165 B.C. It began on the 25th of the month Chisleu and lasted eight days. The dedication of the temple under Ezra was on the 3rd of Adar, Ezra 6:15-16; but that was not made a yearly feast. The dedication of the temple under Solomon was at the Feast of Tabernacles. 1 Kings 8:2; 2 Chronicles 5:3.
The wording John chooses is worth noticing, and so is the timing of the month.
The Maccabean Jews set up the "Feast of Dedication," also called the "Feast of Lights." It remembered the re-dedication of the temple after the victories of Judas over Antiochus Epiphanes, who had desecrated it. The Chanuka generally falls in the month of Chisleu, or December, and so the mention of "winter." Notice that the Evangelist does not speak of it as a "feast" — that is, as if it had divine sanction.
Kelly is reading the original wording, which names the dedication without calling it a feast. English versions such as the ESV supply the word.
People have used this verse to argue that Jesus endorsed observances added by men. One writer answers that the text says only where He was, not what He joined in.
Many of us know the attempt to use the opening of verse 22 to support tradition and human authority in divine things. But it is useless. Here we learn nothing about our Lord taking part in any observances of men, whatever they may have been. We learn only that He was then in Jerusalem, winter as it was, and walking in Solomon's porch.
The porch still carried Solomon's name. But the temple the Lord walked in was not Solomon's temple.
The feast of the dedication of the temple came two months after the events just told, yet the connection with them is clear. The dedication being remembered was not Solomon's. It was the re-dedication by Judas Maccabaeus, after Antiochus had profaned the temple. Yet the Lord walking in Solomon's porch (or colonnade) is surely meaningful: it carries us back to that first dedication, if only by contrast. The massive foundations of Solomon's structure remained, but only in ruin... The glory was gone, the Living Voice that had once spoken to them was silent now. The ark and mercy seat were gone — the throne of the divine Inhabitant, where the covering blood should have been sprinkled.
Consider who was walking in that temple, and how the priests treated Him.
And now we have the surpassingly wonderful PERSON walking there. Shall we see the priests paying homage to the One greater than the temple, greater than the sacrifices, greater than the types and shadows?... And yet He was unknown. He was insulted, called a Samaritan, an outcast, charged with being demon-possessed, and no priest did Him homage. No wonder we have the sentence, "It was winter." Truly it was spiritual winter. Not a leaf on the dead tree of ritualism; the shell had no kernel, the profession had no reality, ordinances gave no satisfaction.
Commentators read the season as a picture of the nation's state.
"It was winter." Yes, "winter!" All was now over with Israel. They had ignored their springtime of mercy and refused the light of their summer. They closed their eyes to the long lingering shadows of their autumn, and now their "winter" had come. Their harvest was past and their summer ended.
Yet another writer points the same picture forward, because seasons change.
In Solomon's porch walked One whose glory far surpassed that of the famous king. Yet He was unwanted and unacknowledged... The Holy Spirit notes, "It was winter." This describes the condition spiritually as well as physically. When Israel is in a better frame of mind, summer will come, for themselves and for all nations.
Earlier in the chapter the Shepherd gathers His sheep. What is winter to them?
It may be "winter" outside (v. 22), but not for those within who are resting on Jesus' breast. No chilling blasts are felt inside the circle of the Father's love.
- Feast — A December festival remembering the cleansing of the temple under Judas Maccabeus. The law never commanded it, and John does not treat it as having divine sanction.
- Porch — Solomon's name still stood over the building. But the glory, the ark and the mercy seat were gone.
- Winter — The word fits the month and the nation. Their religion kept its anniversaries, but the tree was bare and the shell had no kernel.
- Person — On the temple's greatest day, the One greater than the temple walked there unknown, and no priest honoured Him.
- Warmth — One writer looks on to a summer for Israel. Meanwhile no cold reaches those inside the Father's love.
And Jesus walked in the temple in the porch of Solomon.
A colonnade is a covered walkway; this one stood on the temple grounds and carried the name of Solomon, Israel's greatest king. Commentators read that name — and the winter John notes — as a picture of the nation's state, and of the One walking among them unrecognised.
The mention of winter carries two meanings. It also sets the Lord's own walk against the deadness around Him.
In John 10:22-23 our blessed Lord was in the temple in Solomon's porch. The temple was a magnificent structure, with all its show of religious service, and the feast of dedication was in progress. Yet "it was winter." That was true of the season of the year. It was also a perfect description of the nation's condition. Where there was no life spiritually there was no movement toward God, for all its fair show. But there is something else to notice: "Jesus walked." What a delight for the Father to look down on His beloved Son in that winter scene! In Him alone He found something for Himself. There was One who walked for His glory, where every step gave off a sweet fragrance in contrast to the corruption.
The occasion was not one of the appointed feasts of Israel, and its date explains the mention of winter.
The Maccabean Jews set up the "Feast of Dedication," also called the "Feast of Lights." It marked the rededication of the Temple after the victories of Judas over Antiochus Epiphanes, who had desecrated it... It generally falls in the month of Chisleu, or December, and so the mention of "winter." Notice that John does not speak of it as a "feast." He does not treat it as if it had Divine sanction.
The feast marked a later dedication, not Solomon's own. The name on the porch sets the two eras side by side.
Yet the Lord walking in Solomon's porch, or colonnade, is significant. It carries us back to that first dedication, if only by way of contrast. The massive foundations of Solomon's building remained, but only in ruin. However much people tried to repair it, it testified to the failure and ruin that had come in... As it stood, it was the very witness of their showy rule-keeping, which covered up the decay and desolation underneath. The Glory had departed. The Living Voice that once spoke to them was silent now. The Ark and Mercy-seat were gone — the place for the sprinkling of the covering blood, the Throne of God who dwelt there.
There are plain reasons for the shelter, and for the crowd that gathered round Him.
It was winter, and Jesus was walking in the Temple in Solomon's porch. The season of the year may account for that. Further, we gather from the mention of this porch in Acts 3:11 and 5:12 that it was a place where people gathered. While He was walking there the Jews came round Him. With a show of earnest desire they said to Him: "How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly."
A question hangs over the scene. Would the priests honour the One walking among them?
And now we have the surpassingly wonderful PERSON walking there. Shall we have the priests paying homage to the One greater than the Temple, greater than the sacrifices, greater than the types and shadows? All this that lay before His eye was but the shadow. He was the SUBSTANCE. Without Him they would never have been, just as a shadow could not exist without the substance that casts it.
Much happened in that one spot before the Lord left it.
Solomon's Porch saw the remarkable blessing given to the sheep, and the definite condemnation of the unbelievers. It also heard that wonderful announcement of the Lord's oneness with the Father. And it was the place He left, to go back to where the testimony first began. It showed, in no small measure, the moral glory of His person, the stubbornness of His foes, and the end of His work among that guilty nation.
- Season — the December cold explains the covered walkway. Winter also pictures the nation: full religious show, no life.
- Setting — the feast marked a later rededication of the temple. John never calls it a feast God appointed.
- Shadow — the name "Solomon" recalled a glory now gone. No Ark, no Mercy-seat, no Voice: only massive foundations and patched ruin.
- Substance — the temple and its sacrifices were only the shadow. The One walking there cast it, and the priests gave Him no homage.
- Sheep — that same porch heard the blessing given to His sheep and His oneness with the Father. There His work among that nation closed.