Joel 2:30–32

Joel 2:30 · Darby

And I will shew wonders in the heavens and on the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.

After promising to pour out His Spirit, God announces something men will see: blood, fire and columns of smoke. When do these signs come, are they literal sights or pictures, and why does God show them at all?

A Separate Announcement

The verse does not carry on the thought of the outpoured Spirit. One writer marks a break in the prophecy at this point.

But God had a new thing to give them. He would pour out His Spirit on all flesh. The young men and the old men of the people would have visions and dreams. Even on male and female servants this rain from heaven would come down. Verse 30 takes up the subject again from another angle, and does not follow on directly.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same writer elsewhere marks the same break, and names what the day of the Lord falls on.

Then there is another testimony… The day of the Lord is on the northern army; the "day" is the judgment of the Lord. Verses 28, 29 go together; but verses 30, 31 are distinct from them, and refer to what takes place beforehand.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Before the Day of the Lord

These signs are not the judgment itself.

In Joel 2:30 we learn that these things take place before the day of the Lord — before the execution of judgment. Many things come before that day. They are not even events on earth, but early steps in God's government.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Warning Before the Blow

Why send signs at all? One writer sees here a settled habit of God, and reads it back into daily Christian experience.

God will show His power in a remarkable outward way before He carries out the judgment. God always sends a testimony before the thing itself. He does not strike before He warns. It is so in His dealings with us every day. What Christian feels God's chastening before the Spirit of God has warned him? He gives us the chance to put ourselves right morally; and if we do not heed the teaching, then comes the sorrow. And so it is here. These wonders cannot help attracting the mind and attention of men. But men will not really heed them. They are deluded and hardened under God's judgment. They will turn a deaf ear to it all. So the great and terrible day of Jehovah will overtake them like a thief.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Pentecost Was Not the Fulfilment

Peter quoted this passage on the day the Spirit came. Yet what verse 30 lists shows why it was not fulfilled that day.

Now this prophecy was not fulfilled at Pentecost. Peter did not quote it to show that it was fulfilled that day. He quoted it to show the scoffing Jews that this sudden miraculous power was nothing more than their own prophets had foretold as the effect of the Spirit's outpouring. There were no wonders in heaven, no blood, fire or smoke. So the apostle could not have meant that the prophecy was really fulfilled then.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Another writer looks at Peter's exact wording. The New Testament has a set phrase for a fulfilled prophecy, and Peter did not use it.

In so many passages in the New Testament we find the phrase "that it might be fulfilled." But when Peter uses the prophecy in Acts chapter 2, that phrase is missing. Instead we read that he said, "But this is that which was spoken by the Prophet Joel" (Acts 2:16). There is a great difference between this and an outright declaration that the passage was fulfilled.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Sights or Symbols

Commentators differ on how to read the blood, fire and smoke. Kelly, quoted above, expects an outward display that men will see. Another writer reads them as pictures, drawing on how Revelation uses the same words.

So this is a figurative description. It is borrowed from Joel's magnificent prophecy about the events before the day of the Lord… These passages show the time and the circumstances. They also show the right way to read the figures used in Revelation. The time is before the coming of "the great and terrible day of the Lord." The circumstances are God's judgment of the nations. The interpretation of the figures is the overthrow of the powers of the earth by great social and political upheavals.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

Summary

- Break. Verse 30 starts a fresh line of testimony; verses 28-29 belong together, and 30-31 stand apart from them.

- Before. The next verse dates the wonders: they come before the day of the Lord, before God carries out judgment.

- Warning. God does not strike before He warns. The signs give men time, just as the Spirit warns a Christian before chastening falls.

- Deaf. The wonders will grip men's attention, but men will not heed them, so the day still arrives on them like a thief.

- Unfinished. No blood, fire or smoke appeared at Pentecost. Peter never said Joel was fulfilled — only "this is that." The full accomplishment is still ahead.

Joel 2:31 · Darby

The sun shall be changed to darkness, and the moon to blood, before the great and terrible day of Jehovah come.

Joel puts two signs in the sky. A darkened sun and a moon like blood come before the day of the LORD. So when do these signs happen? Are they literal? And what is this "great and awesome day"?

Signs Before, Not During

Everything hangs on the small word "before." Joel first promises the Spirit poured out, then adds the wonders in the sky. One writer keeps the two apart, and puts both ahead of the day.

Then comes another testimony: wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood and fire and pillars of smoke, the sun turned to darkness and the moon to blood — all before the great and terrible day of the Lord comes. The day of the Lord falls on the northern army; the "day" is the judgment of the Lord. Verses 28 and 29 belong together, but verses 30 and 31 are separate from them, and refer to what happens before.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God Warns Before He Strikes

The signs are not the judgment. They are the warning that comes first — and God works the same way with His own people today.

There will be a striking outward display of divine power before God carries out the judgment. God always sends a testimony before the thing itself. He does not strike before He warns. He deals with us the same way every day. What Christian is disciplined before the Spirit of God has first spoken to him?… These wonders are bound to catch people's attention, but they will not truly heed them. Deluded and hardened under God's judgment, they will turn a deaf ear to it all, and so the great and terrible day of Jehovah will overtake them like a thief.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not Fulfilled at Pentecost

Peter read this passage aloud on the day the Spirit came (Acts 2). His exact wording matters — and so does the word he never used.

It is strange that all these teachers use the word "fulfillment" about this prophecy… But the Holy Spirit did not use the word "fulfillment" at all. He avoided saying that on purpose. So many places in the New Testament carry the phrase "that it might be fulfilled." Yet when Acts 2 draws on this prophecy, that phrase is missing. Instead Peter says, "this is what was uttered through the prophet Joel" (Acts 2:16). There is a great difference between that and a flat declaration that the passage was fulfilled.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Peter also chose where to stop reading. That stopping point splits Joel's prophecy in two.

Peter stops at the general statement of salvation, which holds true in every age. He deliberately holds back from quoting to the end, because that end applies only to the future, when the Lord returns to reign at Jerusalem.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

Literal Sky or Political Collapse?

Commentators differ here. Some take the signs at face value, expecting the heavens themselves to change.

In Joel the sun goes dark, and the moon turns to blood, before the day comes. And I take it that if the sea in its appointed place literally becomes like the blood of a dead man, then the moon literally turns to blood too.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Others read the same imagery as a picture of governments falling.

Of course this is not to be taken literally. Such an upheaval would destroy the universe completely, yet the world goes on long after these events. So it is a description in figures… These figures mean the overthrow of the powers of the earth through great social and political upheavals. The sun, the highest authority, goes dark, and the lesser powers, the moon and stars, are either shaken or completely overthrown.

Modernised from T. B. BainesOriginal wording

What "Great and Awesome Day" Means

The day means God's hand shown openly against evil on earth. So it cannot be the same event as Christ coming to gather His people to Himself.

Could there be a clearer example of the folly of treating the day of Jehovah, with its terrors for the earth, as the same thing as Christ's coming to take His own up on high?… The idea of His "day" always assumes a public display of His hand.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Terrible — and Also Merciful

The same day that terrifies the nations rescues those who wait for God. Joel says so himself in the very next verse.

It is just as true that His return will bring salvation. The day is to be one of mercy as well as judgment: mercy to the remnant who wait for Him in a spirit of repentance, judgment to the nation… in Joel, there is deliverance for the remnant whom the Lord calls (Joel 2:32).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Warning — "God always sends a testimony before the thing itself. He does not strike before He warns." The darkened sun is the notice, not the sentence.

- Before — verses 30 and 31 stand apart from the promise of the Spirit. Both come before the day. The signs mark the timing; they are not the day.

- Unfulfilled — Peter said "this is what was uttered," never "that it might be fulfilled." He also stopped mid-verse. The full event is still ahead.

- Debated — do sun and moon go dark for real, or do they picture earthly powers being overthrown? Commentators differ.

- Two-sided — the day is terrible for the world, merciful for those who call on the Lord. The warning comes first so that people will call before it lands.

Joel 2:32 · Darby

And it shall be that whosoever shall call upon the name of Jehovah shall be saved for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as Jehovah hath said, and for the residue whom Jehovah shall call.

Joel closes his warning about the day of the Lord with an open door. The Lord saves anyone who calls on His name. The verse holds two things together. The promise is wide enough for "everyone who calls." Yet the deliverance sits in Zion, among a remnant God Himself calls. Much of the New Testament turns on how the two fit.

Everyone who calls: blessing by grace

The word "everyone" is not decoration. It settles two things: how the blessing comes, and how far it reaches. That mattered in a system that had trained people to think in ranks.

"Whoever will call upon the name of Jehovah shall be delivered" shows that the blessing is by faith, and so by grace... all this is of great importance, because the Jewish system tended by its very nature to limit God and to make classes within the Jews. Only the family of Aaron could go into the sanctuary. Only Levites could touch the holy vessels safely. But this greatest blessing of God will go out with grace that makes no distinctions at all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The remnant whom the Lord calls

The verse has two callings in it, and they run in opposite directions. People call on the Lord; the Lord calls the remnant. One writer puts the order plainly.

Here we find that salvation, or deliverance, is in Zion for Israel in the last days. But it is connected with the call of God, and it will be made in a remnant. It will be there for all, for "whoever shall call on the name of the Lord," but the call of God has to come in to make it effective. He calls a remnant, and this remnant gets the benefit of the deliverance that is in Zion.

Modernised from H. P. BarkerOriginal wording

Zion and Jerusalem

Joel names two places, and each one carries a meaning. The writers here quote an older translation. It reads "deliverance" and "the remnant" where the ESV has "those who escape" and "the survivors."

The city of Jerusalem remains the great and royal centre. Mount Zion appears again, the sign of grace for the kingdom which Jehovah will set up in that day.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where Peter stopped

At Pentecost Peter quoted Joel, but he broke off in the middle of this verse. That deliberate stop tells you the two halves belong to different times.

He stopped in the middle of a verse. "Whoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved." Joel gives a reason for that, adding, "for in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance... and in the remnant whom the Lord shall call." Peter stops at the general statement of salvation, which is true in every age. But he holds back on purpose from quoting to the end. That end applies only to the future, when the Lord returns to reign at Jerusalem.

Modernised from C. E. StuartOriginal wording

The door opened to the nations

Paul takes the same clause in Romans 10 and builds his case for the nations on it. The wording God chose was already larger than its first setting.

The original immediate application was deliverance in Zion for a remnant; Joel 2:32. But God had supplied the blessing in words that let in the Gentile too when the time came. This way of grace of His was far more important than the Jewish privilege. It took for granted the testimony that made known the Lord on whom they were to call.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The writers hold both applications together. The "whoever" is true now. Joel's Zion clause still waits for the day of Israel's deliverance.

The Lord we call on

Joel says Jehovah — the name printed as "the LORD" in the verse above. Paul quotes the line and applies it to Jesus. That move is not a slip of the pen.

"Whoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Notice in passing one of the many incidental proofs of the Deity of Christ. This verse is quoted from Joel 2:32, where the reference is to Jehovah beyond doubt. In Romans 10 it is applied to the Lord Jesus. Then He is Jehovah! If He were not, He would not be qualified to be the Saviour of men.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

No one calls on a stranger

A promise this wide raises a practical problem: nobody calls on a name they have never heard. That is why the promise puts preachers on the road.

How important then is the gospel, in which He is presented as Lord, so that faith may submit to Him... If men are to be saved they must hear the gospel and God must send it. With Him it all begins. God sends the preacher. The preacher delivers the message. Men hear of Christ and they believe in Him. Then they call upon the Lord and are saved.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- God calls first. The deliverance is real for all who call. But "the call of God has to come in to make it effective." He calls the remnant, and the remnant calls on Him.

- Grace, not rank. Deliverance comes by faith, and so by grace. That sweeps away the classes the old system had built.

- Everyone means everyone. The wording God chose let the nations in when the time came. That way of grace outweighs the earlier privilege.

- Jesus is the name. Joel says Jehovah, Paul applies it to Jesus — only He is qualified to save.

- Two halves, two days. Peter quoted the wide promise and stopped. The Zion clause still waits for the Lord's return to reign at Jerusalem.