Job 9:11–24

Job 9:11

Lo, he goeth by me, and I see [him] not; and he passeth along, and I perceive him not.

Job is deep in misery, and he answers his friends by describing a God whose power he can trace everywhere but whom he can never see. So the verse raises the hardest question a sufferer asks: if God is at work in my life and I cannot see Him, how can I get a hearing with Him?

Where the verse sits in Job's reply

Chapter 9 is one long speech in stages. This verse opens the stage where Job turns from God's power to God's distance. One writer sets out the parts of the speech:

Job's reply begins quietly, moves on to bitter charges against God, and ends in a wail. It falls into seven parts... (1) God supreme; who can contend with Him? (Job 9:1-4). (2) His irresistible power (verses 5-10). (3) His inaccessibility, and His dealing as He pleases (verses 11-24). (4) Job's utter weakness (verses 25-28). (5) Longing for a daysman (verses 29-35)...

Samuel Ridout

No access to the One who hides Himself

The pain in the verse is not doubt that God exists. It is that God moves past Job without stopping, and Job cannot summon Him to explain.

Now Job comes to the heart of his trouble. His words are beautiful poetry; only the misery of his complaint runs deeper. He says he can have no access to this great and mighty Being who hides Himself and gives account of His ways to no one. He passes by, unseen as the wind; He acts in anger, but no one can ask a reason.

Samuel Ridout

Unseen in action, yet unstoppable in effect

Job has just spoken of God's works as past finding out. The point of this verse is that the Worker stays unseen while the work stands unopposed.

As he says, God "does great things past finding out, yes, wonders without number" (v.10). In fact, God moves in such a way that Job could not see Him at work, though God can do what no one can hinder (vv.11-12).

Leslie M. Grant

Job's real difficulty — and what it exposed

Job never suspected that his troubles came from some other hand. That certainty is what made his trouble so hard. It also began to work on something in Job himself.

"Behold, He passes by me, and I see Him not; He moves on, but I do not perceive Him"... That is exactly where Job was. He was quite sure that it was of God, and that is the very thing that made the difficulty. Because his conscience was pure toward God, and he knew the goodness of God, and yet how was this? He could not understand it... He was not a proud man; but as all men are, until they learn in the way I have described, he had a very good opinion of himself. That must all come down.

William Kelly

Why searching for God can never succeed

One writer takes Job's words as an honest confession of something true of everyone, not just a bad mood in a bad week. If we cannot find God by looking, He must show Himself.

One serious effect of sin entering the world was that mankind lost the true knowledge of God. Once lost, no effort of man's will or intellect could win back that highest and best of all knowledge... Job confessed his inability in that direction, saying, "Behold, He passes by me, and I see Him not; He moves on, but I do not perceive Him" (Job 9:11). Since, therefore, we cannot discover God, it is necessary that He should make Himself known to us. Revelation becomes a necessity. God reached the crowning point of that revelation of Himself when He made Himself known in Christ as Father.

F. B. Hole

The umpire Job longed for

Later in the same chapter Job asks for a "daysman" — an umpire who could lay a hand on both sides at once. Commentators point to Christ as the answer to that longing.

He is, indeed, that "Daysman" whom Job sighed for, who "might lay His hand upon us both" (see Job 9:32-33). Job knew that God is not a man as he was. So there was an absolute need for One great enough to lay His hand upon God, yet gracious enough to lay His hand upon someone like Job.

F. B. Hole

Others trace the same longing forward inside the book itself, to the man Elihu who steps in later to speak for God:

He reminds Job of his own desire for such a person: "Neither is there any daysman between us, who might lay his hand upon us both" (Job 9:33)... To this desire Elihu now replies: "Behold, I am as you wish, in God's stead; I also am formed out of the clay. Behold, my terror shall not make you afraid, neither shall my hand be heavy upon you."

Samuel Ridout

Summary

- Unseen. God passes by and moves on; Job can trace the effects everywhere but cannot see the One at work, and cannot hinder Him.

- Inaccessible. This verse opens the section on God's inaccessibility. The pain is not that God is absent. It is that He gives account of His ways to no one.

- Undeniable. Job never doubted the hand was God's. That certainty, with a clear conscience, made the trial so hard. It also began to bring down his good opinion of himself.

- Unfindable. No effort of will or intellect can recover the knowledge of God. So God must reveal Himself, and He reached the high point of that when He made Himself known in Christ as Father.

- Answered. The chapter cries out for a daysman who could lay a hand on both sides. Christ answers that cry — great enough to touch God, gracious enough to touch a man like Job.

Job 9:12

Behold, he taketh away who will hinder him? Who will say unto him, What doest thou?

In this chapter Job describes God's power, and that same power is what crushes him. Verse 12 is where his description turns into a complaint: God takes away, and no one can call Him to account.

Where the verse falls in Job's speech

Here Job turns from God's power to God's distance.

Coming to the heart of his trouble, Job says that he can have no access to this great and mighty Being, who hides Himself and gives no account of His ways to anyone. His words are beautiful poetry, and only the misery of his complaint runs deeper than their beauty. He passes by, unseen as the winds; He deals in anger, but no one can ask a reason.

Samuel Ridout

Why the truth of it made his pain worse

Job never doubted where his losses came from. That certainty is what tightened the knot.

"Behold, He snatches away; who can turn Him back? Who will say to Him, What are You doing?" That is exactly where Job was. He was quite sure that it was of God, and that is the very thing that made the difficulty. Because his conscience was pure toward God, and he knew the goodness of God, and yet how was this? He could not understand it, and neither did they in the slightest degree.

William Kelly

Sovereignty is not bare power

Job states the fact in despair. Taken on its own, the same fact gives rest, because of who this sovereign One is.

He does according to His will in the army of heaven and among the inhabitants of earth, and none can stay His hand or say to Him, "What are You doing?" We rest, because we know who reigns. It is not mere sovereignty, the almighty despotism of bare will, to which we bow because we must, but the sovereignty of wisdom, holiness and goodness — of One in whom love is revealed in light.

Frederick William Grant

The question God allows

No one has the standing to cross-examine God. Yet God did not shelter behind His rights. He opened His dealings to full examination.

He is, and must be, sovereign in His doing, so that "none can stay His hand, or say to Him, What are You doing?" Yet He will allow the question, and let everything come into the fullest light. He takes away Job's hedge and allows Satan wide limits within which to deal with him. The end, of course, is blessing for the sufferer and full vindication of God's perfect ways.

Frederick William Grant

The real question underneath

Earlier in the chapter Job asked how a man could be right with God. His words about a God no one can stop come out of that unsolved problem. He saw God's power and God's mercy, but no righteous ground where the two could meet.

Job did not doubt that God would see him through all his difficulties. But he could not see on what righteous ground God would do it. If man was a poor sinful man, and God still showed him saving mercy, how was man to be just? You cannot put justice and sins together until you have Christ, who died for the sins and rose again for the believer's justification.

William Kelly

Later in the same speech Job looks for a "daysman" — an umpire who could stand between himself and God.

Where is there a daysman, a mediator who could enter into judgment, laying his hands upon God and Job alike? Consumed with terror, Job cannot speak. Thank God, we know, as Job later knew in part, that there is such a Daysman.

Samuel Ridout

The purpose behind the taking away

Job also assumed that God neither hears nor replies. That assumption was wrong, and so was his verdict that the wounds had no cause.

That was great ignorance of God, because God does answer and God does hear. "For He breaks me with a tempest" — and that was true — "and multiplies my wounds without cause." Ah, without cause; that is a little too much to say. He had His own wise cause; He had His own blessed purpose. He meant that Job should be a far happier man, and brighter in his state, than he had ever been before.

William Kelly

Summary

- Fact. No one can hold God back or call Him to account. That is true of God, whoever says it.

- Colour. Job says it in despair, as of a God who hides Himself and explains His ways to no one. The mistake is in his tone, not in the fact.

- Character. God rules by wisdom, holiness and goodness, not by bare will. Knowing who reigns turns that fact into rest.

- Patience. God need not answer. Yet He allows the question and brings the whole case into the light. The end is blessing for Job and full vindication of His ways.

- Answer. Job longed for someone to stand between himself and God. There is such a Daysman: Christ, who died for our sins and rose again for the believer's justification.

Job 9:13

+God withdraweth not his anger; the proud helpers stoop under him

Bildad has just been talking about how God deals with the wicked and the righteous, and Job does not dispute it. But he presses the question Bildad never faced: if God is this strong, how can any man stand before Him and be right?

The Question Behind the Chapter

The whole speech grows out of one question Job asks at the start of the chapter.

He began by acknowledging that God's disciplinary ways are right. But he raised the all-important question: how could a man be right with God? In our day people use the short sentence, "Get right with God," to awaken interest in the gospel message. It might well provoke the reply, "Yes, but how is it to be achieved?" That is the very question Job asked in verse 2. The rest of the chapter shows how earnest and sincere he was in asking it, for he suggested and examined four possible answers. Each suggestion begins with an "If."

F. B. Hole

Who the Helpers of Rahab Are

"Rahab" here is not a person but a name. Older translations render the phrase as "the proud helpers."

A poetical name, signifying 'insolence,' given to Egypt. Ps. 87:4; Ps. 89:10; Isa. 51:9.

Morrish Bible Dictionary

Job's picture, then, is of the mightiest backers of the proudest power on earth.

Coming to the heart of his trouble, Job declares that he can have no access to this great and mighty Being who hides Himself and gives no account of His ways to anyone. He passes by, unseen as the winds. He deals in anger, but no one can ask a reason — not even the "proud helpers," the "helpers of Rahab" (Egypt). They can only bow under Him.

Samuel Ridout

Anger That Is Not Turned Back

The first half of the verse says as much as the second. Job is not describing a temper that cools.

He will not withdraw His anger from anything contrary to Him, and He will lay flat under His feet those who identify themselves with the proud.

Leslie M. Grant

The Argument Turned on Himself

Job draws the conclusion in the next line: if they stoop, what chance has he? The comment below quotes an older translation of the verse.

"If God will not withdraw His anger, the proud helpers do stoop under Him. How much less shall I answer Him?" There he is beginning to feel his weakness. He was not a proud man; but as all men are, until they learn in the way I have described, he had a very good opinion of himself. That must all come down. If a man is to be blessed, or a woman, the blessing will not come by a good opinion of oneself. That is wrong, and the greatest hindrance to the blessing of God and the enjoyment of His grace.

William Kelly

The Question Bildad Missed

What Job says about God's power is true — so true that God Himself will press the same point on him at the end of the book. The error in this debate lies elsewhere.

Bildad had talked truisms about God's dealing with the wicked and the righteous. But he had not faced the question: how can mortal man have a standing of righteousness with God? For his own part Job admitted man's inability, and God's right to act according to His power. In fact, it was exactly what Job himself experienced when the LORD put His questions to him at the close of the book. To dispute it is to court destruction. So to blame his sufferings on secret wickedness showed ignorance of God's sovereign ways.

William Kelly

The Cry It Produces

Because no one can stand under that anger, Job reaches for something he cannot find.

All efforts to change the judgment are useless. And oh — where is there a daysman, a mediator who could enter into judgment, laying his hands on God and Job alike? Consumed with terror, Job cannot speak. Thank God, we know, as Job later knew in part, that there is such a Daysman.

Samuel Ridout

Summary

- Question. The chapter runs on one question — how can a man be right with God? — and verse 13 is Job's evidence that he cannot manage it himself.

- Rahab. The name means insolence — a poetic name for Egypt. Its "helpers" are the strongest allies pride ever recruited.

- Stooping. If those helpers bowed, no one else can stand. Job's next words draw the obvious conclusion about himself.

- Humbling. A good opinion of oneself is the greatest hindrance to God's blessing. Job's had to come down.

- Daysman. The verse leaves a man with no footing before God. That is why Job cries out for a mediator — and we know there is one.

Job 9:14

How much less shall I answer him, choose out my words [to strive] with him?

Job is answering his friend Bildad, and he has just spent a dozen verses describing a God who moves mountains, seals up the stars, and passes by unseen. Against all that, his question here is simple: does a man have any words that could stand up in God's presence?

Where Job's confidence starts to break

In the verse just before, even the proudest helpers bow under God. One commentator hears the first crack in Job's own confidence:

"If God will not withdraw His anger, the proud helpers stoop under Him. How much less shall I answer Him?" There he is beginning to feel his weakness. He was not a proud man; but as all men are, until they learn better, he had a very good opinion of himself. That must all come down. If a man is to be blessed, the blessing will not come by a good opinion of oneself. That opinion is wrong. It is the greatest hindrance to the blessing of God and to the enjoyment of His grace.

William Kelly

Older translations read "how much less shall I answer Him," which ties Job's question straight to the verse before.

Words chosen for a plea, not a defence

Job weighs what words he could choose, then drops the idea. The only speech he can imagine is of a different kind:

What words does Job have with which to answer God? He feels unable to choose words that might have any effect. However righteous he may be, he felt hopelessly unable to make any impression on God by his speaking. He feels he could only beg for mercy from Him whom he calls "my Judge." Even then he doubted that God would listen to his voice.

Leslie M. Grant

Why clearing his own name fails

The rest of Job 9 works through the options. The first is the obvious one: could Job clear his own name?

Could he justify himself? This would at least mean giving up the defiant attitude and quietly admitting he was wrong, and so needed to be justified. Self-justification is a very attractive idea, yet Job raised it only to dismiss it as unworkable. He knew he had only to open his mouth to condemn himself. What is more, anyone who would justify himself before the searching eye of God must prove his own perfection. Nothing short of that would satisfy.

F. B. Hole

What made it worse is that Job was sure the blows came from God. One writer puts it like this: "He cannot answer Him in His majesty, and he does not see His love."

J. N. Darby

Why he needs someone in between

If Job cannot speak for himself, the only hope is that someone else speaks for him. Later in the chapter he says he knows of no such person. The qualifications he lists show why:

How clear it is that Job knew he was a sinful creature before his holy Creator. He knew he had in himself no means of getting right. That being so, his only hope was that a third party would step in; but he knew of no such third party, or "daysman." His three friends could not take the part, and no other man could. The daysman must be great enough to lay one of his hands upon Almighty God, and gracious enough to lay the other upon poor, diseased and sinful Job.

F. B. Hole

One dictionary explains the older word "daysman": it "signifies 'mediator,' or 'umpire'" — one who "might lay his hand on us both."

Morrish Bible Dictionary

The answer Job could not reach

Job's own book leaves the problem open. One writer names the person who answered it:

Christ became the mediator between God and men. And He is not just a mediator. He is a mediator who is as divine as the God before whom He acts as mediator for us. If there had not been the hand of God in the cross, there could have been no divine redemption… therefore what now comes in is the righteousness of God. And there is nothing against that. But it is a justifying righteousness; it is not a condemning righteousness. The same God who condemned under the law saved under grace, because of Christ.

William Kelly

Summary

- Collapse. Job's "how then can I answer Him?" is the sound of a good opinion of himself coming down. That collapse opens the door to blessing; it does not close it.

- Speechless. He can find no words with any weight before God; the only speech left to him is a plea for mercy to his own Judge.

- Dead ends. Self-defence fails: his own mouth would convict him. Nothing less than perfection would satisfy the searching eye of God.

- Gap. What he needs is a daysman — someone great enough to lay a hand on God and gracious enough to lay the other on a sinful man. Job knew of no one.

- Answer. Christ became that mediator — as divine as the God He stands before for us. He brings in a righteousness that justifies instead of condemning.

Job 9:15

Whom, though I were righteous, [yet] would I not answer; I would make supplication to my judge.

Job answers his friends with the question that runs under the whole book: how can a man be right with God? Verse 15 is his verdict on his own case. Even a clean record would leave him nothing to say in that court — only a plea for mercy from the One who is judging him.

Before God as Judge

Job is not arguing with his friends here. He is before God as Judge, and that is where every believer comes too.

Job 9. This chapter brings out the state of Job's mind. He says, "I know it is so of a truth. But how should man be just with God?" He gets before God as Judge, and his perplexity is very great. He cannot answer God one in a thousand.

Charles Stanley

The same writer presses the question onto the reader, and not only onto Job:

Poor Job! He does not know now which way to turn. And is not this the case with every believer the moment he gets before God as Judge? How can he or you be just before God? Would not one sin of a thousand utterly condemn you?

Charles Stanley

Innocence with nothing to say

Job does not deny that he has lived uprightly. He denies that it gives him any case here. He cannot even find words that would count.

What words could Job use to answer God? He feels unable to choose words that might have any effect. However righteous he may be, he felt hopelessly unable to make any impression on God by his speaking. He feels he could only beg for mercy from Him whom he calls, "my Judge."

Leslie M. Grant

Translations differ on the last phrase: some read "my judge," as this writer does, while the ESV has "my accuser."

The collapse of self-confidence

One writer reads Job's refusal to answer not as despair but as real godliness. Getting there costs a man his good opinion of himself.

There he is beginning to feel his weakness. He was not a proud man. But like all men before they learn this lesson, he had a very good opinion of himself. That must all come down. If a man or a woman is to be blessed, the blessing will not come through a good opinion of oneself. That is wrong. It is the greatest hindrance to the blessing of God and to the enjoyment of His grace. "Though I am in the right, I cannot answer him." There, you see, was true godliness.

William Kelly

Hope without a footing

Job trusts God. What he cannot see is any ground for that trust.

He fully believed that God was faithful to him, and faithful to His children in general. But where was the ground for it? Well there was no ground yet at all. It was all hope. It was a hope in the Christ who was coming. But they did not know how Christ would answer to that hope. They only knew it would be all right, but how, they had no idea.

William Kelly

The longing for someone in between

Job cannot argue his case and cannot clear himself. So he reaches for someone to stand between him and God — a "daysman."

How clear it is that Job knew he was a sinful creature before his holy Creator, and that he had in himself no way of getting right. Since that was so, his only hope was for a third party to step in. But he knew of no such third party, no "daysman." His three friends could not play the part, and neither could any other man. The daysman must be great enough to lay one of his hands on Almighty God, and gracious enough to lay the other on poor, diseased, sinful Job.

F. B. Hole

The answer Job could not yet have

Job's question did not stay unanswered.

Compared with other men, Job knew that he had been righteous, and God Himself had confirmed this when He spoke to Satan. But only the New Testament gives a full answer to Job's question. It says of believers, "you are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God — and righteousness and sanctification and redemption." Christ's sacrifice on Calvary has laid a righteous basis for our eternal salvation. So God counts us righteous through faith in Christ. Of course Job could not understand this at the time, for Christ had not yet died for us.

Leslie M. Grant

Summary

- Question — Stand before God as Judge and one question matters: how can a man be right with God? One sin out of a thousand would condemn him.

- Verdict — However upright he may be, his words make no impression. Being right before men gives him no case before God.

- Posture — So he stops arguing and begs. A good opinion of oneself is the greatest hindrance to God's blessing and grace.

- Gap — Job has no way of getting right in himself. So he wants a daysman — someone great enough to lay a hand on God, and gracious enough to lay the other on a sinful man.

- Answer — What Job could only hope for has come. Christ has become righteousness for believers, and God counts them righteous through faith.

Job 9:16

If I had called, and he had answered me, I would not believe that he hearkened to my voice, --

Job 9 is Job's reply to his friends, and verse 16 is one of its starkest lines. Even if God answered his call, Job could not believe he had been heard.

The question driving the chapter

Job's words here are not a stray complaint. They belong to one question that runs through the whole chapter.

This drew from Job the striking words recorded in Job 9. He began by admitting that God's disciplinary ways are right, but he raised the all-important question: how can a man be right with God? In our day people have used the short saying, "Get right with God," to awaken interest in the Gospel message. It may well prompt the reply, "Yes, but how is that to be done?" That is exactly the question Job asked in verse 2. The rest of the chapter shows how earnest and sincere he was in asking it, for he suggested and examined four possible answers. Each suggestion starts with an "If."

F. B. Hole

What the words say

Verse 16 belongs with verse 15, where Job says he would plead for mercy rather than argue his case. Verse 17 then explains why he expects nothing: the blows keep falling.

What words does Job have to answer God? He feels unable to choose words that might have any effect. However righteous he may be, he felt completely unable to make any impression on God by speaking. He feels he could only beg for mercy from the One he calls "my Judge." Even then he doubted that God would listen to his voice (vv.15-16). Instead of listening, Job saw God crushing him with a tempest and adding to his wounds for no real cause (v.17).

Leslie M. Grant

The word translated "called" carries a legal weight — the sense of summoning someone to court. One rendering of the lines brings that out:

Though I had cited Him, and He had answered me, / I would not believe that He would listen to me.

William Kelly

Majesty without love

Job's trouble is that he sees God's majesty but not His love, and yet he cannot get away from Him.

Then Job takes up another case. He cannot answer Him in His majesty, and He does not see His love… He is troubled in his soul about it… God is not a man, as we are. Job would have escaped God's presence if he could, but he could not. He was completely wrong about this, but he could not get away from God.

J. N. Darby

Where Job was wrong

Job's feeling was real, but his conclusion about God was wrong.

Well, that was great ignorance of God. God does answer, and God does hear. He delights in His children now. Now that they are cleared, now that they know Him, He delights in perfect closeness and love with Himself. "For He crushes me with a tempest" — and that was true — "and multiplies my wounds without cause." Ah! without cause; that is a little too much to say. He had His own wise cause; He had His own blessed end. He meant that Job should be a far happier man and brighter in his state than he had ever been before.

William Kelly

What the despair was reaching for

Job's doubt that his voice is heard drives him toward something he cannot supply — someone to stand between him and God.

It is clear that Job knew he was a sinful creature before his holy Creator, and that he had no way in himself of getting right. So his only hope was for a third party to step in; but he knew of no such third party, or "daysman." His three friends could not play that part, and neither could any other man. The daysman must be great enough to lay one hand on Almighty God, and gracious enough to lay the other on poor, sick, sinful Job.

F. B. Hole

Christ meets that need, and takes away the fear Job carried.

God has taken away the fear in Christ, and there is a daysman between us, such as Job felt the need of.

J. N. Darby

Summary

- Question. The chapter runs on one enquiry — how a man can be right with God — and Job tests four answers, each beginning with "If."

- Despair. Verse 16 is the low point of that testing: he would only beg for mercy, and even then doubted God would listen to his voice.

- Distortion. Job saw God's majesty but not His love, and could neither answer Him nor escape Him.

- Correction. God does answer and God does hear; the wounds Job called causeless had a wise cause and a good end in view.

- Daysman. Job needed a go-between great enough to lay a hand on God and gracious enough to lay the other on him. Christ is that daysman, and in Him God has taken away the fear.

Job 9:17

He, who crusheth me with a tempest, and multiplieth my wounds without cause.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Job 9:18

He suffereth me not to take my breath, for he filleth me with bitternesses.

Job is answering Bildad. Instead of defending himself, he describes a God so strong that no one can argue a case against Him — and here the blows land faster than Job can recover.

The Plain Sense of the Words

Job read the blows as proof that God was not listening to him.

Instead of God listening, Job saw Him as crushing him with a tempest and multiplying Job's wounds without any actual cause. This seemed so relentless that Job felt God was not giving him time to even catch his breath, so that bitterness filled him.

Leslie M. Grant

"Without Cause"

Job's description of the storm is accurate; his verdict on it is not. There was a reason for every wound, and it was a kind one.

"For He breaks me with a tempest" — and that was true — "and multiplies my wounds without cause." Ah! without cause; that is a little too much to say. He had His own wise cause; He had His own blessed end. He meant Job to be a far happier man, in a brighter state than he had ever been in before. Until Christ came, that could only be done by making him a bag of broken bones — so Job would learn that all the goodness was in God and all the badness was in himself.

William Kelly

Bitterness Under a Calm Surface

Job speaks calmly here. The calm is not peace, and what he grants about God is not praise.

Although he speaks quietly, there is an intense bitterness in what Job says here. He seems to agree with Bildad that God is just. Job says, "Of course He is just, for there is no appeal from whatever He does. He has both wisdom and power, and can crush any useless effort to reason with Him." This is terrible. It is not someone humbly asking God for a reason, as Jeremiah does in similar circumstances. It is the hardness of despair — might is right, and God has might on His side.

Samuel Ridout

No Way to Wash Himself Clean

A few verses later Job takes the thought to its end. If the verdict is already fixed, washing himself changes nothing — and out of that dead end comes his cry for a go-between.

Job hints that there is no use in trying to clear himself. If he is already pronounced wicked, he labours in vain to convince God that he is not. He may wash his hands in innocence, in snow water — and then this irresistible Power takes him and plunges him into the ditch! All efforts to change the judgment are useless. And oh — where is there a daysman, a mediator who could step into the case and lay his hands on God and Job alike? Consumed with terror, Job cannot speak. Thank God, we know, as Job later knew in part, that there is such a Daysman.

Samuel Ridout

Daysman is the older word for an umpire or go-between who can put a hand on both parties.

Honest and Still Wretched

Job was not pretending; his conscience was clear. His misery came from somewhere else.

When there is real integrity of heart, there is struggle. The sense of integrity, without the knowledge of righteousness, is the cause of much misery in the heart. Job says, "Let not His fear terrify me." He had this fear. God has taken away the fear in Christ, and there is a daysman between us, such as Job felt the need of.

J. N. Darby

Summary

- No breath. The blows come faster than Job can recover. He gets no pause, and they leave him full of bitterness.

- No cause? The wounds were real, but "without cause" claims too much. God had His own wise cause and His own blessed end: a happier Job than before.

- No appeal. Job grants that God is just — but only because no one can argue with strength. That is despair, not worship.

- No washing. If the verdict is already settled, snow water changes nothing. So Job reaches for a daysman, someone who can lay a hand on both sides at once.

- No fear. A clear conscience without the knowledge of righteousness still leaves misery. In Christ, God has taken that fear away — He is the daysman Job was feeling for.

Job 9:19

Be it a question of strength, lo, [he is] strong; and be it of judgment, who will set me a time?

Job is answering his friends, and his reply keeps hitting the same wall: God is too great to argue with. Here he weighs two ways a man might settle his case with such a God — raw power or a fair hearing — and finds both doors shut.

A case with no courtroom

Job never denies that God has justice on His side. His complaint is that no court will ever hear him.

If Job thought of strength — and he had none — it pressed on him that God is strong. If he thought of justice, of course God has both strength and justice on His side. But Job felt he was not even allowed a day in court to plead his cause.

Leslie M. Grant

Why the lawsuit collapses

The second half of the verse asks who could summon God to court. Older translations read it as "who will set me a time?" — who could even fix a date for the hearing? Either way the answer is nobody, and the reason lies as much in what man is as in what God is.

How vain to think of a favourable outcome in a lawsuit with God! It would dishonour His glory to think that He could stoop to such a contest, or listen to a creature's argument against His ways. Not only must He crush all opposition, but a man's own mouth would condemn him, and he himself would be proved perverse. So he would not dare to think of such a plea for himself, but of crying out for mercy.

William Kelly

Majesty seen, love unseen

Job's estimate of God's power is right. What he cannot see is God's love — and he cannot get away from Him either.

He cannot answer Him in His majesty, and he does not see His love… But he has to do with God, and he cannot help it. He cannot escape His hand. He is not a man, as we are. Job would have got away from God's presence if he could, but he could not; he was all wrong about this, but he could not get away from God.

J. N. Darby

The book does not let these words stand. One writer traces Job's charge that God destroys the blameless and the wicked alike, then turns to speak to Job himself:

Oh Job, for these words you will yet loathe yourself, and repent in dust and ashes.

Samuel Ridout

The missing third party

A few verses later Job asks for a "daysman" — an umpire who could stand between the two sides. No one within his reach could do it.

How clear it is that Job knew he was a sinful creature before his holy Creator, and that he had in himself no means of getting right. That being so, his only hope was for a third party to step in; but Job knew of no such third party, or "daysman." His three friends could not fill the role, and no other man could either. The daysman must be great enough to lay one of his hands on Almighty God, and gracious enough to lay the other on poor diseased and sinful Job.

F. B. Hole

The answer Job could not reach

The deadlock of this verse is not the last word. What Job could only ask for, one writer says, has now come.

He needs another to help him, to bring him in touch with God, to make him just with God. He calls for a daysman, an umpire, one who might lay His hand on God and on him, the sinner, so that the rod may be taken from him and he may be freed from fear. We find the daysman foreshadowed later in this book. But He has come: Christ Jesus our Lord.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

The change begins when a man stops calling the world wicked and says instead that he himself is wicked.

When I come to the point of saying (not that the world is wicked, but) that I am wicked, I have the "daysman" between me and God. He is the One who has come to me in all the wickedness of my heart, and has come to me because I am like that. Now I have not only God working in me… but God doing a work for me. He brings in a righteousness (His own) for the sinner. He works a work for us.

J. N. Darby

Summary

- Deadlock. Job tests both routes to God — force and legal argument — and both close: God is stronger, and no one can call Him to trial.

- Reason. A lawsuit against God cannot succeed. A man's own mouth would condemn him, so he can only cry out for mercy.

- Blind spot. Job's view of God's majesty is right; what he misses is His love — and he cannot escape His hand either way.

- Missing man. Job needs a mediator big enough to lay one hand on God and gentle enough to lay the other on him. He knew of no one who could do it.

- Arrival. Commentators name that Mediator as Christ. In Him God does not only work in the sinner; He works for him, bringing in a righteousness of His own.

Job 9:20

If I justified myself, mine own mouth would condemn me; were I perfect, he would prove me perverse.

Job has asked how anyone can be right with God. In this verse he tests the answer most people reach for first: pleading his own case. It defeats itself. Speaking in his own defence would only supply the evidence against him.

Just among men, or just with God

The question driving the chapter is not whether Job is a decent man. One writer, quoting verse 2 in an older translation, points out that the weight of Job's question falls on its last two words.

There is more emphasis in this chapter than we often realise. "How should a man be just with God?" The emphasis falls on "with God." A man may be just in a certain sense. He may not fail in any way that troubles his conscience in his dealings with other people. But to be just with God is another thing altogether… How to be just with God is a wholly different question, and this is what Job's inner struggles brought him to.

J. N. Darby

An option raised only to be dropped

The idea in verse 20 has an obvious appeal, and Job gives it only a moment.

At verse 20, Job suggested another possible answer. How could he be just with God? Well, could he justify himself? That would at least mean giving up his defiant attitude. It would be a quiet admission that he was wrong and needed to be justified. Self-justification is a very attractive proposition. Yet Job only stated it to dismiss it as unworkable. He knew he had only to open his mouth to condemn himself.

F. B. Hole

Standing before God as Judge

Job is now standing before God as Judge. One writer turns that same position on the reader.

He gets before God as Judge, and his perplexity is very great. He cannot answer God one question in a thousand… How can he, or you, be just before God? Would not one sin out of a thousand utterly condemn you? Yet this is the desperate struggle of Job, and of every human heart — to be just before God.

Charles Stanley

Why the claim to be perfect backfires

The second half of the verse says the claim to be blameless would expose the opposite. A claim that passes easily among people collapses in God's presence.

Our consciences may be quite at ease while we are far from God and not yet awake to Him. But the moment we have to face what we are in God's presence, we see that our case is desperate. We all know more or less what self-righteousness is. We can carry on with it well enough until God's eye is upon us… A man may have an excellent character, and deserve it too, but he has not a perfect conscience. But the moment we recognise God's presence, the veil is off. We see God, and His word searches the thoughts and intentions of the heart.

J. N. Darby

Whose verdict is in view

Commentators differ on who would prove Job perverse. One takes it as God's own verdict on the claim.

How can Job confront such a One? If he tried to justify himself, his own mouth and lips would condemn him at once. And if he said he was perfect and blameless, God would only prove his perverseness.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

Another reads it as Job's despair over the men sitting in front of him: they will never believe him.

If he were allowed his day in court to plead his case, he felt that just opening his mouth would ruin him, righteous though he was. Even though blameless, his mouth would prove him perverse (v.20). What does he mean? Is he not saying that no matter how blameless he is, his very speaking proves to his friends that he must be dishonest and perverse?

Leslie M. Grant

The way out that Job has not yet seen

The dead end of verse 20 is not the end of the matter. Giving up the case is what opens the door.

Nothing matters more morally than to see this: whenever we justify ourselves, we condemn God. And when we condemn ourselves, we justify God… The moment true self-judgment breaks the soul down, God rises before it in all the majesty of His grace as a Justifier. But as long as a spirit of self-defence or self-satisfaction rules us, we stay complete strangers to a deep blessing — the blessing of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works. The greatest folly anyone can be guilty of is to justify himself, since God must then impute sin. But the truest wisdom is to condemn oneself utterly, for in that case God becomes the Justifier.

C. H. Mackintosh

Summary

- The question. Job is not asking whether he is respectable among men. He is asking how anyone can be just with God.

- The attempt. Self-justification is "a very attractive proposition." Job raises it, then drops it as unworkable.

- The collapse. He needs only to open his mouth to convict himself. One sin out of a thousand is enough. A claim to be perfect proves the opposite.

- The disagreement. Commentators differ over whether it is God or Job's friends who would prove him perverse.

- The reversal. Justify yourself, and God must impute sin. Condemn yourself utterly, and God becomes the Justifier.

Job 9:21

Were I perfect, [yet] would I not know my soul I would despise my life.

Job's friends insist that his suffering proves his guilt. He answers with a far bigger question — how can anyone be right with God — and in verse 21 his own claim to be blameless falls apart.

Four Answers, Tested and Dropped

Chapter 9 is Job's search for an answer. One writer counts the options he raises and drops:

He began by admitting that God is right to discipline. But he raised the all-important question: how can a man be right with God? In our day the short sentence, "Get right with God," has been used to awaken interest in the gospel message. It might well provoke the reply, "Yes, but how is it to be achieved?" This is exactly the question Job asked in verse 2. The rest of the chapter shows how earnest and sincere he was in asking it, for he put forward and examined four possible answers.

F. B. Hole

Verse 21 sits inside the second answer: justifying himself. The same writer explains why it fails:

Self-justification is a very attractive idea. Yet Job raised it only to dismiss it as impossible. He knew he had only to open his mouth to condemn himself. And anyone who would justify himself under the searching eye of God must prove his own perfection. He went on to say that even if he were perfect, God would judge and destroy him. Job only knew perfection as human standards measure it.

F. B. Hole

The Man Who Did Not Know Himself

The verse's middle line, "I regard not myself," reads as a condition in older translations: "Were I perfect, yet would I not know my soul." Either way, Job does not know his own heart. One writer makes that the key to the whole book:

But with all this, Job had never sounded the depths of his own heart. He did not know himself. He had never really grasped the truth of his own utter ruin and total depravity. He had never learnt to say, "I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwells no good thing." We must grasp this point, or we will not understand the book of Job. We will not see the purpose of the deep and painful trials Job had to pass through. First we must face a solemn fact: his conscience had never really been in God's presence, and he had never seen himself in the light.

C. H. Mackintosh

Despair That Tips Into Accusation

Losing confidence in himself does not bring Job peace. It turns into a charge against God, and one writer answers him plainly:

Even if he knew himself innocent, he is completely lost and despairs of his life. God is a destroyer of guilty and innocent alike, and mocks when they perish. The earth is in the hands of the wicked — is it not so? Oh Job, for these words you will yet abhor yourself, and repent in dust and ashes.

Samuel Ridout

The Purpose Behind the Breaking

Job says his wounds come without cause. One writer agrees about the pain, but not about the word "cause":

"For He breaks me with a tempest" — and that was true — "and multiplies my wounds without cause." Ah, without cause; that is a little too much to say. He had His own wise cause; He had His own blessed end. He meant that Job should be a far happier man and brighter in his state than he had ever been before; and until Christ came it could only be by making him a bag of broken bones — to learn that all the goodness was in God and all the badness was in himself.

William Kelly

What Job Was Missing

Job ends the chapter wanting someone to stand between himself and God:

If only there were an effective go-between, how different it would be; but, says Job, "it is not so with me." Have we ever thanked God with enough warmth that it is so with us? The fact is that though he may not have known it, Job was longing for the coming of Christ. We can now rejoice in the "one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus" (1 Tim. 2:5). By Him the ransom price was paid, so that it is possible for a man to be just with God.

F. B. Hole

The end of the book cures Job's blindness to himself:

In gaining this knowledge of God, Job gained a matching knowledge of himself by experience, for he added, "I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes." So it always is. The more we know of God, the more, by contrast, we know ourselves. Self-knowledge of this sort is very painful but it is very healthy, for it leads to salvation from self, which is a deliverance of the first order.

F. B. Hole

Summary

- Question — Job is not defending his reputation. He asks how any man can be right with God, and no answer he tries holds.

- Collapse — Self-justification needs a perfection Job cannot produce. The "blameless" he claims fits human standards, not God's.

- Blindness — He does not know his own heart. He had never yet seen himself in God's light.

- Purpose — Job called his wounds causeless. God had a wise cause: to teach him that all the goodness was in God and all the badness in himself.

- Answer — What he lacked was a mediator. What he gained at the end was the sight of God, and with it the true knowledge of himself.

Job 9:22

It is all one; therefore I said, he destroyeth the perfect and the wicked.

Job has just admitted that he cannot win an argument with God. Now he says something bolder: God treats the blameless and the wicked the same way — a plain fact about life, or a charge against God?

"It is all one"

One writer reads the opening words as Job's protest that God's dealings make no difference between him and a guilty man.

Job insists that he is blameless (v.21), yet even so he came to despise his life (v.21). He found himself on the same level as a wicked man: "it is all one thing." God's dealings lumped the righteous and the wicked together. "Therefore I say, He destroys both the blameless and the wicked" (v.22). It is true that this seems to be the case more often than not in our present life. But how different it will be in the long run!

Leslie M. Grant

An observation his friends would not face

One writer takes Job's stubbornness here as an honest reading of the world.

The greatest disaster might come, and God send it, and many completely innocent people might die just as much as the wicked. Say the sack of a city, or a plague sent by God in His moral government. These things are real, I say, and Job stuck to that. All their talk never drove him from the plain fact they dodged and shut their eyes to. "The earth," he says, "is given into the hand of the wicked." … These things happen. Innocent people suffer. Guilty people escape. All of it goes on every day… Things are out of order, and will be until the Lord takes the reins.

William Kelly

Or a charge against God

Commentators differ here. Where one hears a plain fact, another hears an accusation that has crossed a line.

The words that follow sound almost like the ravings of a madman. He speaks out, but not in the fear of God. He acts as if he does not care. He says it is all the same to him whether he is right or wrong, because God destroys the perfect and the wicked alike. In other words, God is unjust… If God has not done all this, who has? These are horrible words. The one who accuses God to believers as much as he accuses believers before God must have whispered them into his despairing soul.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

The argument the verse is finishing

The words close one of several answers Job has been testing to his own question: how can a man be right with God?

At verse 20, Job suggested another possible answer. How could he be just with God? Could he justify himself?… Self-justification sounds very attractive, yet Job raised it only to dismiss it as impossible. He knew he had only to open his mouth to condemn himself. Anyone who would justify himself before the searching eye of God must prove his own perfection. Nothing less would do… He went on to say that even if he were perfect, God would judge and destroy him. He only knew perfection as people measure it.

F. B. Hole

Why Job cannot walk away

Someone who decided God is indifferent might drop the subject. Job cannot.

A disaster comes, and the best family may fall victim to it. Shall I give up God then, and not trouble myself about it? But he has to do with God, and he cannot help it. He cannot escape His hand… Job would have got away from God's presence if he could, but he could not. He was all wrong about this, but he could not get away from God.

J. N. Darby

Where the chapter is heading

Later in the chapter Job asks for someone to stand between himself and God. One writer says that request was answered.

"For He is not a man, as I am, that I should answer Him, and we should come together in judgment. There is no arbitrator between us." That is what Christ became. Christ became the mediator between God and men. He is not only a mediator; He is a mediator who is just as divine as the God before whom He acts for us… What is brought in now is the righteousness of God. There is nothing against that. But it is a justifying righteousness, not a condemning righteousness. The same God who condemned under the law saved under grace, because of Christ.

William Kelly

Summary

- Complaint. "It is all one" means Job feels lumped in with a guilty man. As he sees it, God draws no line between the blameless and the wicked.

- Fact. Innocent people do die alongside the guilty in disasters, and Job would not pretend otherwise to please his friends. Things stay out of order until the Lord takes the reins.

- Overreach. Others read the same words as Job speaking without the fear of God. He is calling God unjust — words the accuser whispered to him.

- Dead end. The verse closes Job's try at self-justification. Perfection measured by human standards cannot survive God's searching eye.

- Answer. Job cannot escape God's hand, so he asks for someone to stand between. Christ became that mediator, and He brings in a righteousness that justifies instead of condemning.

Job 9:23

If the scourge kill suddenly, he mocketh at the trial of the innocent.

Job is answering Bildad, and his words have turned dark. He has just said that God destroys the blameless and the wicked alike; now he charges God with amusement while disaster sweeps the innocent away — a true picture of the world, or a false picture of God? (Older translations read "he laughs at the trial of the innocent"; the sense is the same.)

The question behind the outburst

Job did not reach this sentence out of nowhere. Chapter 9 is his search for one answer: how can a man be right with God? He tests each possibility and throws it away, including the idea of clearing his own name.

At verse 20, Job suggested another possible answer. How could he be just with God? Well, could he justify himself? This would at least mean giving up the defiant attitude. It would be an unspoken admission that he was wrong, and so needed to be justified. Self-justification is a very attractive idea. Yet Job only raised it in order to dismiss it as unworkable. He knew he had only to open his mouth to condemn himself.

F. B. Hole

What Job saw was real

The facts Job pointed at are not imaginary. A scourge — a disease sweeping through a country — does not check a person's character before it strikes.

Job is troubled in his soul about it. "He destroys the perfect and the wicked. If a scourge slays suddenly, He will laugh at the trial of the innocent." A scourge comes, and perhaps the best family falls victim to it. Shall I give up God then, and not trouble myself about it? But he has to do with God, and he cannot help it. He cannot escape His hand.

J. N. Darby

Mistaking patience for mockery

Job is so uneasy about what he is saying that he keeps God's name out of these verses. The delay he calls mockery is really God holding back judgment.

Job grows bolder and says it out. Yet his piety still holds back the name of God, as in verses 22 and following. He shrank from seeming to put God's rule of the world on trial. But he does speak bitterly of God's patience while judgment delays, as if God were mocking at the trial of the innocent. This is what no saint should conclude from His allowing wrong and sorrow for a little while.

William Kelly

The voice behind the words

Read plainly, the verse says God enjoys the death of the innocent. That is no longer a complaint about circumstances. It is a charge against God's character, and one writer traces where such a thought comes from.

He assumes indifference. He says it is all the same to him whether he is right or wrong, for God destroys the perfect and the wicked alike. In other words, He is an unjust God. When the scourge of disease marches through the land and kills suddenly, He only mocks at the innocent who are taken away. The earth is given by Him into the hands of the wicked; injustice reigns everywhere. If God has not done all this, who then is it? These are horrible words. Some being must have whispered them into his despairing soul — the being who accuses God to His people as much as he accuses God's people before Him.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

Why the world looks this way

Job's error is not in his eyesight but in his timing. He judges the world as if God had already settled every account.

This was what Job found so hard to understand — how those who did evil prospered, while the righteous were persecuted. This is just because the time of judgment has not come. The time of mercy is going on now, and we cannot have mercy and judgment at once. So all is a riddle now. There is too much badness for man to think that things come from God. And there is too much goodness, even in all the ruin and misery, for him to say that they do not come from God.

J. N. Darby

The answer to the suspicion

Later in the book another voice answers this suspicion head on. Job feared that God's greatness leaves Him careless about small sufferers.

In one word he sweeps away the unholy suspicions Job had been harbouring — "God is great, and does not despise anyone." He is infinite in power, yet He looks with compassion on the weakest of His creatures... How comforting is the truth, "He despises no one!" His greatness is never an occasion for scorn. His wisdom is infinitely powerful, but never used against weakness.

Samuel Ridout

Summary

- Facts: Job's observation is honest. Disaster falls on the best families just as often as on the worst.

- Conclusion: What he built on it is false. From real facts he makes an unjust God, amused by the suffering of the innocent.

- Source: The accuser whispers such thoughts. He slanders God to His people as much as he slanders them to God.

- Timing: The world looks like mockery only because judgment has not yet come. This is the time of mercy, so all stays a riddle.

- Character: God is great and despises no one. His greatness is never an occasion for scorn.

Job 9:24

The earth is given over into the hand of the wicked [man]; he covereth the faces of its judges. If not, who then is it?

Job has just said that God destroys the blameless and the wicked alike. Here he goes further. Bad men run the world, and the courts that should stop them see nothing. How much of this is plain fact, and how much is despair talking?

The fact Job would not let go

Job's friends looked away from something plain. He kept naming it.

All their talk did not drive him away from the plain fact which they dodged and shut their eyes to. "The earth," he says, "is given into the hand of the wicked." And is that not true?... And further, "He covers the faces of its judges" — that is, He allows them to give completely wrong and unjust verdicts. Somehow their faces are veiled from the light, and they judge by appearances. It is very certain that this is not the way to judge soundly... innocent people suffer; guilty people escape; these things happen every day... Things are out of course, and will be until the Lord takes the reins.

William Kelly

The challenge in "If it is not He, who then is it?"

Job's closing question puts his friends in a corner. Yet there is a conclusion no believer should draw while God holds back judgment.

He does speak bitterly of God's patience while judgment delays, as if mocking at the trial of the innocent. This is what no saint should conclude from His allowing wrong and sorrow for a little while. But there is no denying that He veils the faces of judges. The wicked sit in the highest seats of the world's authority. If it is not so, who is it? Can Bildad or Eliphaz contradict the fact, or leave God out of it?

William Kelly

Where the observation turns into an accusation

Job does not just report the injustice. He lays it at God's door.

But the words that follow sound almost like the ravings of a madman. He speaks out, but not in the fear of God... God destroys the perfect and the wicked alike; in other words, He is an unjust God. The earth is given by Him into the hands of the wicked; injustice reigns everywhere. If God has not done all this, who then is it? These are horrible words. They must have been whispered into his despairing soul by the accuser. He accuses God to believers just as much as he accuses believers before God.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

What happens when a sufferer reasons it out alone

Job worked this out on his own. Where that leads is the warning here.

When we see everything on earth in confusion, it seems to many people that there is no God in control of things at all. In all of these things, if we depend on our own understanding, we shall be left in complete confusion. Job needed the verse written much later in history: "Trust in the LORD with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding" (Prov. 3:5).

Leslie M. Grant

Why the wicked do hold the earth for now

Why do the wicked hold the earth at all? One writer starts with what Job saw and what Eliphaz believed.

Job knew that "The tents of robbers are at peace, and those who provoke God are secure" (Job 12:6). Eliphaz thought instead that "in prosperity the destroyer will come upon" the wicked (Job 15:21). What Eliphaz thought was sometimes right, but it was not always right, as the writer of Psalm 73 knew, and as we know from what is all around us. God has allowed Satan to become the god and prince of this world. Satan has authority to dispose in some way of the kingdoms of this world (Luke 4:6). Once we realise that, the prosperity of the wicked will not puzzle us.

An Outline of Sound Words

The need this drives Job toward

Later in the same chapter Job asks for someone to stand between himself and God — a "daysman" in older translations.

How clear it is that Job knew he was a sinful creature before his holy Creator. He also knew he had no way in himself of getting right. That being so, his only hope was for a third party to step in; but no such third party, or "daysman," was known to him. His three friends could not play the part, and no other man could either. The daysman must be great enough to lay one of his hands on Almighty God. He must be gracious enough to lay the other on poor diseased and sinful Job.

F. B. Hole

Summary

- The fact. Job is right. The earth is in wicked hands, and judges give crooked verdicts. What Eliphaz believed about the wicked was sometimes true, but not always.

- The fault. Job moves from seeing the injustice to blaming God for it. One writer traces those words to the accuser, who accuses God to believers and believers to God.

- The reason. God has allowed Satan to act as god and prince of this world, so the success of the wicked should not shake us.

- The delay. God allows wrong and sorrow for a little while. Things are out of course and will stay so until the Lord takes the reins.

- The need. Reasoning alone leaves a sufferer in confusion. Job needed a mediator big enough to touch God and gracious enough to touch him.