Behold, happy is the man whom +God correcteth; therefore despise not the chastening of the Almighty.
Eliphaz ends his first speech with a real truth: the man God corrects is a happy man, and no one should look down on that correction. The trouble is who he aimed it at — a man he had already decided was hiding secret sin.
Eliphaz's statements are true on their own. The trouble is what he does with them:
F. B. HoleSome of the things Eliphaz says in this chapter are completely true. For example, "Man is born to trouble, as the sparks fly upward," in this world of sin. It is also true that God "takes the wise in their own craftiness," and that "Happy is the man whom God corrects." But we can see that he put all these facts forward in a way that turned them against poor Job.
The whole speech rests on one wrong assumption:
William KellyEvery word may be true in itself. He says it all with great dignity and force. Yet he applies it wrongly and one-sidedly, so in effect the whole thing is wrong. Eliphaz assumes that God is displaying His government right now, and that He measures prosperity or hardship exactly to what people deserve. This is false ground. It spoils the application, especially to someone like Job, who had been handed over to Satan's attacks.
Read closely, the word "happy" is the very thing that shuts Job out of the sentence in the speaker's mind. Kelly points out the irony, and how the sentence came true anyway:
William Kelly"Behold, happy is the man whom God corrects" (ver. 17). He never thought that this was true of Job. He knew that Job was very unhappy, and so he did not count him as one of these at all... Eliphaz never imagined that it would come true in Job's own case. It was a vague sort of sermon; and although he called Job to apply it, he had no idea that God would apply it.
Job felt none of this happiness, and Eliphaz's tone made it worse:
Leslie M. GrantAgain, he voices an excellent principle, "Happy is the man whom God corrects" (v.17). But Job did not feel happy. Of course, God was only beginning His correcting work with Job, and Job did not discern it... If Eliphaz had spoken this to Job in a kind and encouraging way, it might have helped him. Instead he blamed Job for not gaining that blessing by confessing he was guilty of secret sin.
The word behind "chastening" is a teaching word first, and a word for punishment after that:
J. N. DarbyWe have the word musahr, meaning instruction, warning, advice; it covers chastisement too; Prov. 1:3; Job 5:17.
The command not to despise God's discipline has a companion warning elsewhere in Scripture — not to lose heart under it. Each warning rests on a separate fact:
J. N. DarbyGod does not only govern the world for outward blessing. He also governs each person directly and personally — a most gracious and precious truth... The Word draws two conclusions from this truth, that it is God's love. It will not be without a cause in me. It will never be without love in God. So I am not to despise it, because there is a cause in me that makes the Holy God of love act this way. I am not to lose heart, because it is His love that does it. It is the correcting of a son in whom his Father delights.
Correction does not mean God has turned away. It marks out the people He owns:
Edward DennettThe principle is this: "As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent." (v. 19) Hardly anyone would question that this principle applies to those in relationship with Christ (compare Job 5:17-18; Proverbs 3:11-12; Amos 3:2; Hebrews 12:5-8). It lies at the very foundation of the way God governs His people in this world... So this warning comes out of the tenderness and the love of His own heart.
To take chastening well, the sufferer has to look past everything in the foreground — people, circumstances, even the enemy at work in Job's story:
Samuel RidoutNo matter how great the afflictions are, or how often they come, deliverance will arrive in due time... We are led to look past every apparent cause, every human instrument, and even Satan himself. We are led to see that Hand which "will never cause His child a needless tear." So our blessed Lord took that great affliction at the hands of God: "The cup which my Father has given Me, shall I not drink it?"
- Cause. Correction is never random: it will not be without a cause in the one corrected, and never without love in God.
- Word. The word translated "chastening" means instruction, warning and advice. It teaches; it does not just punish.
- Proof. Correction proves relationship, not rejection. It comes out of God's tenderness, and it lies at the foundation of how He deals with His people.
- Response. Two dangers, two answers: do not despise it, because there is a cause in you; do not lose heart, because it is His love doing it.
- Aim. Truth used as an accusation stops helping. Eliphaz's saying was excellent, but he thought prosperity measured a man's standing with God. So he called happy a group he never imagined Job could join.
For he maketh sore, and bindeth up; he woundeth, and his hands make whole.
Eliphaz is speaking to Job, and his words about God are true: the hand that strikes is the hand that heals. The trouble is his target — a man whose suffering had nothing to do with hidden sin.
One hand sends the trouble, and the same hand brings the relief. The quotation below follows an older translation, where the ESV's "his hands heal" reads "His hands make whole."
Samuel RidoutThe relief also comes from the same blessed source: "His hands make whole." How good it is to know that all the trial and the relief — comes from Him.
The wound is His, so there are two wrong responses: making light of it, and giving up under it. Faith looks past every visible cause to the hand behind it.
Samuel RidoutHappy indeed is he who receives chastening at the loving hands of God; we are neither to despise nor to faint under such dealings. No matter how great the afflictions, or how often they come, deliverance will arrive in due time... Let the sufferer only say, "It is your hand," "I know that in faithfulness you have afflicted me." The Scriptures are full of this precious truth for the child of God. This truth leads us to look past all apparent causes, all human instruments, or even Satan himself, to see that Hand which "will never cause His child a needless tear."
Every clause of the verse can be defended. The fault lies in the theory underneath it. Eliphaz thinks God settles every account now, so a man's troubles show what he deserves.
William KellyEvery word may be true in itself; all is said with the utmost dignity and force; yet it is misapplied and one-sided, and so, in effect, wrong as a whole. Eliphaz assumes that God at the present time is displaying His government, giving each person exactly the prosperity or trouble he deserves. This is false ground, and it spoils the application, above all to a man like Job, handed over to Satan's attacks and tested by God to the end — not the bitter end, but the sweet.
Said kindly, the same words could have helped Job.
Leslie M. GrantAgain, he voices an excellent principle, "Happy is the man whom God corrects" (v.17). But Job did not feel happy. Of course, God was only beginning His correcting work with Job, and Job did not discern it... If Eliphaz had spoken this to Job in a kind and encouraging way, it might have helped him. Instead he was blaming Job for not gaining such blessing — for not confessing that he was guilty of secret sin.
Quote this verse at the wrong moment and it does more damage than an obvious mistake. Nobody can dismiss it.
William KellyAbstract truth is altogether useless for the saints of God. Things that are true, but misunderstood and misapplied, may do more harm than many a thing that is false. Misapplied truth gives an error the apparent authority of God. That error carries all the more weight because it comes as the truth. If someone says a foolish thing, or one clearly false, people despise it; but no believer can slight the truth of God. So if people misuse the truth of God — if they use it to crush someone who is an object of intense interest to God at the time, how foreign and offensive to His mind!
The principle itself is not limited to Job. It runs through Scripture, and its root is love.
Edward DennettHardly anyone will question that this principle applies to those in relationship with Christ (compare Job 5:17-18; Proverbs 3:11-12; Amos 3:2; Hebrews 12:5-8, and others). It lies at the very foundation of the way God governs His people in this world... It is therefore out of the tenderness, out of the love of His own heart, that this warning proceeds. He never afflicts willingly.
Eliphaz said it too soon and too coldly, but the end of the book proved it true. Job's healing came, though not through confessing the secret sin Eliphaz imagined.
Samuel RidoutNow Jehovah can lift His hand from the sufferer, and turn all the grievous captivity into full and prosperous recovery. Job can say, I "have received double from the Lord's hand." The relatives and acquaintances who had fled from him and despised him return with gifts and sympathy.
- One hand. The stroke and the healing come from the same hand. The sufferer never has to work out which part of his life God is behind.
- One response. Neither despise the correction nor faint under it; say instead, "It is your hand."
- One motive. He never afflicts willingly. Rebuke and chastening flow from love — a principle running from Job through Proverbs to Hebrews.
- One misuse. True words aimed at the wrong person do more harm than plain error. They lend God's authority to a false verdict.
- One outcome. The hand that wounded Job lifted. He received double, and the verse proved true — though not on Eliphaz's terms.
He will deliver thee in six troubles, and in seven there shall no evil touch thee.
Near the end of his first speech, Eliphaz turns from rebuke to promise: God rescues His people from trouble after trouble. But Job's children are dead and his body is covered in sores — so can true words still be the wrong thing to say?
One commentator sums up where Eliphaz's appeal finally lands:
William KellyIn the end Eliphaz urges Job to submit to the correcting hand of God, who would surely deliver him from all evil and bless him with all good. And he says this not only in his own name, but in his friends' name too, counting confidently on their full agreement.
Nothing Eliphaz says here is untrue about God. The problem is what he assumes underneath it:
William KellyEvery word may be true in itself. He says it all with great dignity and force. Yet he misapplies it, and it is one-sided, so in effect the whole thing is wrong. Eliphaz assumes that God is right now displaying His rule, measuring prosperity or hardship exactly by what people deserve. This is false ground, and it spoils the way he applies his words, especially to someone like Job.
The same words could have helped Job. What ruined them was the blame carried with them:
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz could tell him, "Therefore despise not the discipline of the Almighty, for He wounds, but He binds up; He shatters, but His hands heal. He will deliver you from six troubles; in seven no evil shall touch you." If Eliphaz had said this to Job in a kind and encouraging way, it might have helped him. But he was blaming Job for not gaining that blessing by admitting he was guilty of secret sin.
The promise of rescue follows straight after the picture of a God who wounds:
Samuel RidoutSo the relief also comes from the same blessed source: "His hands heal." How good it is to know that all the trial and the relief comes from Him.
The counting — six, then seven — points to trouble that keeps returning, not one crisis. Repeated blows call for neither contempt nor collapse:
Samuel RidoutHappy indeed is the one who receives correction from the loving hands of God. We are neither to despise it nor to lose heart under such dealings. However great or often repeated the afflictions are, deliverance will come in due time.
Eliphaz does not leave the number vague. He names the troubles, from public disaster down to the private wound Job was feeling at that moment:
Samuel RidoutEliphaz mentions the worst outward trials, famine and war, even to the point of destruction. He also mentions the inner, bitter pains Job was suffering at that very moment, caused by the biting tongue. No harmful animal can injure him, for when someone is right with God, He makes all things his friends… We can carry the view further, in the clearer light of the New Testament, and ask: "Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword?"
The strangest thing about this promise is that it came true. It did not come true on Eliphaz's terms, or because Job took his advice:
William KellyAnd the remarkable thing is that this was how it ended. Little did Eliphaz think that his words would come true in Job's case. It was more of a general sermon. He called on Job to apply it, but he had no idea that God would apply it, and that God would bring Job out more blessed than ever.
- One hand — the hand that wounds is the hand that heals. Trial and relief come from the same source.
- Six, then seven — the count says the troubles keep coming. No number of repeated blows uses up God's deliverance.
- Named, not vague — Eliphaz names them: famine, war, the biting tongue, wild animals. The promise covers public disaster and private pain alike.
- True but misaimed — Eliphaz assumes God measures prosperity and hardship by what people deserve. That false ground turns a true promise into an accusation.
- The end proved it — God, not Eliphaz's advice, brought Job out more blessed than before. Eliphaz never expected his own words to come true.
In famine he will redeem thee from death, and in war from the power of the sword.
Eliphaz is speaking here. He is listing the blessings that would be Job's if Job took his advice: famine and the sword would lose their power over him. It sounds like a promise anyone would want. But commentators press a harder question. Are the words true, and was Eliphaz the right man to say them to Job?
Eliphaz keeps pointing back to what he has seen with his own eyes. That is the base of his whole argument.
F. B. HoleAs we open Job 5, we find Eliphaz continuing on this note and again he refers to what he had seen. Verse 3 begins, "I have seen …" And if we turn to Job 15, which holds his second speech, we again find him saying, "That which I have seen I will declare." So it is clear that the weight of his argument rests mainly on his own powers of observation. In those powers he trusted for his opinion of the meaning of the calamities that had fallen on Job.
Famine and the sword open a longer list. Eliphaz moves from the worst outward trials to an inner pain: the wound made by a cruel tongue.
Samuel RidoutGoing into detail, Eliphaz mentions the worst outward trials: famine and war, even to the point of destruction. He also mentions those inner, bitter pains caused by the biting tongue, which Job was suffering at that very moment. No harmful beast can injure him, for when a person is right with God, He makes all things his friends… We can carry the view further in the clearer light of the New Testament, and ask: "Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? … No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us."
God later said these men had not spoken the truth about Him. Yet the New Testament quotes Eliphaz as Scripture. How can both be so?
William KellyYet this is too remarkable to pass by. The Spirit of God uses as Scripture the very words that the LORD later treated as a false picture, not only of Job but of Himself… You only have to examine the words of Eliphaz to see that in themselves they hold nothing but truth. But weigh them as applied to Job, and they are wrong beyond excuse… The New Testament quotes the words of Eliphaz, both in the first letter to the Corinthians and in the letter to the Hebrews. There the application is perfectly right. In the Old Testament story the application was wrong, and God rebuked the men who spoke it.
The rescue in this verse comes from God's own hand. So does the affliction. A sufferer who sees this has solid ground under him.
Samuel RidoutHappy indeed is the person who takes correction from the loving hands of God. We are not to despise such dealings, and we are not to lose heart under them. However great the afflictions, and however often they come, deliverance will arrive in due time… Let the sufferer only say, "It is Your hand," and, "I know that in faithfulness You have afflicted me." The Scriptures are full of this precious truth for the child of God. They lead us to look past every apparent cause, past every human instrument, past even Satan himself, and to see that Hand which "will never cause His child a needless tear."
Job did get the blessings Eliphaz describes. But they came by a different road. That gap shows the weakness of advice built on watching other people.
Leslie M. GrantIn verses 20 to 27 Eliphaz describes the many blessings that would be Job's if he took the advice of Eliphaz. God did in the end give these blessings to Job, but only after He spoke to him in chapters 38-41. God broke Job down, so that he judged the pride of his own sinful nature. Eliphaz had not seen what Job truly needed — the same need Eliphaz himself had… Can we depend on another person's word so far as to know it is fact? No: we need more than another person's observation, we need the Word of God to be certain as to any serious matter.
- Source — Eliphaz argues from what he has seen happen to other people. He reads Job's disasters by those same powers of observation.
- Scope — He names the worst outward trials, famine and war. Then he moves inward, to the pain caused by the biting tongue.
- Standing — In themselves the words hold nothing but truth, and the New Testament quotes them as Scripture. Applied to Job, they were wrong beyond excuse.
- Sameness — Affliction comes from the loving hand of God. So the sufferer can say, "It is Your hand," and look past every human instrument.
- Sequel — The blessings did come to Job, but only after God spoke and broke him down. For certainty on any serious matter we need the Word of God, not another person's observation.
Thou shalt be hidden from the scourge of the tongue; and thou shalt not be afraid of destruction when it cometh.
Eliphaz ends his first speech with a list of promises: rescue from famine, from war, from ruin, and shelter from cruel words. The comfort sounds real, but it comes from a man who has already decided why Job is suffering — and a true sentence aimed at the wrong man does damage.
Almost every line here is true on its own. The problem is the assumption underneath it.
William KellyEvery word may be true in itself. It is all said with great dignity and force. Yet it is misapplied and one-sided, and so, in effect, wrong as a whole. Eliphaz assumes that God is right now displaying His government, measuring prosperity or trouble to people exactly as they deserve. This is false ground, and it undermines the application, especially to a man like Job, who was handed over to be attacked by Satan.
The same true statements, arranged as Eliphaz arranges them, become an accusation.
F. B. HoleSome of the sayings of Eliphaz in this chapter are perfectly true. For instance, "Man is born to trouble, as the sparks fly upward," in this world of sin. It is also true that God "takes the wise in their own craftiness," and that "Happy is the man whom God corrects." But we can see that he put all these facts forward in a way that turned them against poor Job.
The phrase names a real weapon. The prophet Jeremiah felt it: his enemies planned to silence him with words.
Georges AndréThey decided to "strike him with the tongue" and to spread false rumours about him. Backbiting and slander would stop his preaching and keep anyone from listening to his words. When David had a similar experience he prayed to God, saying, "Hide me from the secret plots of the wicked... who have sharpened their tongue like a sword, and have aimed their arrow, a bitter word" (Ps. 64:2-3). The "scourge of the tongue" is mentioned in Job 5:21.
Beside famine and war, the tongue is a different kind of trouble — and it was Job's own trouble as Eliphaz spoke. The New Testament takes the same list further.
Samuel RidoutGoing into detail, Eliphaz mentions the worst outward trials — famine and war, even to destruction. He also mentions the inner, bitter pains caused by the biting tongue, which Job was suffering at that very time... We can carry the view further in the clearer light of the New Testament, and ask: "Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword?... No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us."
Who stands behind the trouble, and behind the rescue? One writer traces both to the same hand.
Samuel RidoutWe are led to look past every apparent cause, past every human instrument, past even Satan himself. We are to see that Hand which "will never cause His child a needless tear." So our blessed Lord took that great affliction from the hands of God: "Shall I not drink the cup that the Father has given me?"
The fault was not only in what Eliphaz said, but in how he said it.
Leslie M. GrantIf Eliphaz had said this to Job in a kind and encouraging way, it may have helped him. Instead, he was blaming Job for not gaining that blessing by confessing that he was guilty of secret sin.
The picture Eliphaz painted did in the end describe Job's life — though not because his diagnosis was right.
William KellyThe remarkable thing is that this really was the end. Eliphaz had little idea that it would come true in Job's case. It was more of a vague sermon. He called Job to apply it, but he had no idea that God would apply it, or that God would bring Job out more blessed than ever.
Eliphaz ended by pointing to what he had searched out himself. That is the weak link.
Leslie M. GrantAgain, it is his own observation that he depends on, but he urges Job to hear it and know for himself. Can we so depend on another person's word as to know it is fact? No: we need more than another person's observation, we need the Word of God to be certain as to any serious matter.
- Source. Every trial and every relief traces back to one Hand. The wounding and the healing are not two rival powers, but one God at work.
- Scourge. The tongue stands beside famine and war because slander is a real weapon. Its wound is inward, and Job was bleeding from it as Eliphaz spoke.
- Shelter. The promise of shelter from cruel words is true. But Eliphaz built it on his own observation, and observation cannot settle a serious matter. Only God's Word can.
- Misfire. True words aimed at the wrong man become accusations. Eliphaz's mistake was to assume that prosperity today shows who deserves what.
- Outcome. Job did receive what Eliphaz described, but by a road Eliphaz never imagined. So be slow to explain another person's suffering.
At destruction and famine thou shalt laugh, and of the beasts of the earth thou shalt not be afraid.
Eliphaz has moved from rebuke to promise. He paints the future he believes Job could have, if only Job would admit his fault. It is a life so safe that famine and wild animals are a joke, not a threat.
The bold picture of safety in this verse does not rest on a word from God. It rests on what one man had watched happen over a long life, and he says so repeatedly.
F. B. HoleAs we open Job 5, we find Eliphaz continuing on this note and again he refers to what he had seen. Verse 3 begins, "I have seen …". Turn to Job 15, which records his second speech, and again we find him saying, "what I have seen I will declare" (verse 17). So his argument rests mainly on his own powers of observation. He trusted those powers to tell him what Job's disasters meant.
He had turned what he saw into a fixed law about how God deals with people now. It left him blind to the trial in front of him.
William KellyHe is genuinely shocked at Job's outburst. He then sets out his law that God repays every person in this present life. He does this more to lift Job out of his wild despair into godly speech than to condemn him as ungodly. If Job did fear God, as Eliphaz still believed, why was that not his confidence? Why were his upright ways not his hope? Clearly Eliphaz knew as little as Job about where this trial came from, what it was, and what it was for.
The verse names famine, destruction and wild animals. Eliphaz also gives a reason why none of them can touch the right man.
Samuel RidoutComing to the detail, Eliphaz names the worst trials from outside: famine and war, even to destruction. He names the inner, bitter pains too, caused by a biting tongue — the very pains Job was suffering at that moment. No harmful beast can injure such a man, for when one is right with God, He makes all things his friends. The home of the righteous stays secure, and his descendants bear witness to the faithfulness of God. Death only closes this beautiful picture in calm — the old believer gathered to his ancestors like a sheaf of grain fully ripe. We can extend the view in the clearer light of the New Testament, and ask: "Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? … No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us."
A sentence can be true in itself and still be wrong in the mouth that speaks it. That is how the New Testament can quote Eliphaz as Scripture while God still reproved him.
William KellyYou only have to examine the words of Eliphaz to see that in themselves they contain nothing but truth. But weigh them as applied to Job, and they are wrong beyond excuse. How wise is the way of the Lord! How deep and admirable is what God has given us in the Scriptures! The New Testament quotes the words of Eliphaz both in the first letter to the Corinthians and in the letter to the Hebrews. There the application is entirely right. In the Old Testament story the application was wrong, and God reproved the speakers for it.
Job did end up laughing at ruin instead of fearing it. But it came by a road Eliphaz never imagined.
Leslie M. GrantIn verses 20 to 27 Eliphaz describes the many blessings that would be Job's if he took the advice of Eliphaz. In the end God did give these blessings to Job. That came after He spoke to Job in chapters 38-41 and broke him down to judge the pride of his own sinful nature. But Eliphaz had not seen what Job truly needed — the very need Eliphaz had himself.
The same words can help or wound, depending on the aim behind them.
Leslie M. GrantIf Eliphaz had said this to Job in a kind, encouraging way, it might have helped him. Instead he was blaming Job for not gaining such blessing, since Job would not confess that he was guilty of secret sin.
- True. The picture of fearless safety here is beautiful, and nothing in the words themselves is false. The New Testament even quotes Eliphaz as Scripture.
- Untrue to Job. The same words were wrong beyond excuse when aimed at Job, and God reproved the speakers for it.
- Sourced wrongly. Eliphaz built his case on his own observation — "I have seen" — not on any word from God. He knew nothing of where Job's trial came from, or what it was for.
- Said wrongly. Spoken kindly, this promise might have helped Job. Spoken as a charge of hidden sin, it only blamed him.
- Fulfilled anyway. Job did receive these blessings. But God gave them after He spoke and broke down Job's pride — not on the terms Eliphaz set.
For thou shalt be in league with the stones of the field, and the beasts of the field shall be at peace with thee.
Eliphaz ends his first speech with a promise of a world made friendly — even its rocks and its wild animals. He says it to Job, a man who had just lost his children, his wealth and his health. The words are lovely. But commentators ask whether the man saying them had any right to aim them at Job.
Eliphaz's speech builds to an appeal. He urges Job to bow under God's correcting hand. Then he paints what would follow: safety from famine, war and slander, and this line about the field and its beasts.
William KellyIn the end, Eliphaz advises Job to submit to the chastening hand of God. God would surely rescue him from all evil and bless him with all good. And Eliphaz says this not just for himself, but in the name of his friends, whose full agreement he counts on with confidence.
The picture moves from public disasters to private ones, and then out to the land itself.
Samuel RidoutGoing into detail, Eliphaz mentions the worst outward trials: famine and war, even destruction. He also names the inner, bitter pains Job was suffering at that very moment, caused by the biting tongue. No harmful beast can hurt him. When someone is right with God, He makes all things that person's friends. The home of the righteous stands secure. His children will bear witness to the faithfulness of God.
Here is the puzzle of the whole speech, and one writer's answer to it.
William KellyGod Himself declares that what they said was not right. Yet the Holy Spirit gives it all by inspiration, and uses the words of one of these men as Scripture. These two things can be reconciled, and very simply. You only have to examine the words of Eliphaz to see that in themselves they contain nothing but truth. But weigh them as applied to Job, and they are inexcusably wrong. The New Testament quotes the words of Eliphaz, in the first letter to the Corinthians and in the letter to the Hebrews — and there the application is perfectly good.
A promise is only as good as the authority behind it. Eliphaz builds his case on what he has watched happen to people, and then reads Job's disasters by that rule.
F. B. HoleIt is clear that his argument rests for its force mainly on his own powers of observation. In those powers he trusted for his opinion about the meaning of the disasters that had fallen on Job.
Grant puts the same test to the reader:
Leslie M. GrantCan we depend on another person's word so far as to know it is fact? No. We need more than another person's observation. We need the Word of God to be certain about any serious matter.
Job did end up with this restored, peaceful life. What Eliphaz got wrong was not the outcome but the route, and the diagnosis behind it.
Leslie M. GrantIn verses 20 to 27 Eliphaz describes the many blessings that would be Job's if he took his advice. In fact God did give these blessings to Job in the end. It happened after He spoke to Job in chapters 38-41 and broke him down, so that Job judged the pride of his own sinful nature. But Eliphaz had not discerned what Job really needed — the same need that Eliphaz himself had.
The world today does not offer this — land and animals that are no threat. Other writers place that state in a coming day, when man's place over creation is put right again.
T. B. BainesAgain, the ferocity of the wild beasts is restrained, and man's supremacy established. All nature is made subject to the Son of Man — the Second Man: "all sheep and oxen, and also the beasts of the field, the birds of the heavens, and the fish of the sea" (Ps. 8:7-8). So "the wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat … and a little child shall lead them" (Isa. 11:6).
The same hope reaches further than farms and flocks. Ridout carries the verse forward into words the New Testament gives believers:
Samuel Ridout"Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? … No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us."
- Peace promised. The verse crowns Eliphaz's picture of a restored life. Field, beasts and home are all at peace with a man who bows to God's correcting hand.
- Peace explained. When someone is right with God, He makes all things that person's friends — even the animals that could harm him.
- Peace misapplied. The words in themselves contain nothing but truth. Aimed at Job, they are inexcusably wrong.
- Peace mis-sourced. Eliphaz built his rule on what he had seen in life. So he could state a true promise and still misread the man in front of him.
- Peace fulfilled. Job did receive these blessings — but only after God Himself spoke, and by a road Eliphaz never understood. The same peace waits for all creation.
And thou shalt know that thy tent is in peace; and thou wilt survey thy fold, and miss nothing.
Eliphaz closes his first speech to Job with a picture of a life put back together: a home at peace, a flock counted and complete. But commentators ask a harder question. Did the man who spoke these words understand the sufferer in front of him?
One writer gives a plainer rendering of verse 24, taken from an older translation that is close to the ESV. He reads it together with the two verses that follow.
F. B. HoleThe advice given toward the end of his speech was good. Job should not despise the chastening of the Almighty. He should accept the correction. Then the tide of evil would turn and blessing would come in. The closing verses speak of God's deliverance coming in; of renewed prosperity. Verse 24 has been rendered, "You shall know that your tent is in peace; and you will survey your fold, and miss nothing." Verse 25 speaks of many descendants. Verse 26 speaks of Job himself reaching the end of his life at a good old age.
The book of Job records the speeches, but it does not approve of them. One commentator gives the rule for reading any line from the friends.
Leslie M. GrantThis does not mean that Job's words, or those of his three friends, were a revelation from God. It means that God gave an accurate record of what they said, even though in some cases what they said was wrong. In other cases their words were right, but their application of the truth was not correct.
Eliphaz ended his speech with a picture of how Job's story could finish. The book ends that way — and that is the last thing he expected.
William KellyAnd the remarkable thing is that that was the end; and little did Eliphaz think that it would be verified in Job's case. His speech was more like a general sermon. He called Job to apply it, but he had no idea that God would apply it, and that God would bring Job out more blessed than ever.
The outcome matched; the route did not. God restored Job after He spoke and broke him down — not after Job confessed the hidden sin his friends imagined.
Leslie M. GrantIn verses 20 to 27 Eliphaz describes the many blessings that would be Job's if he took the advice of Eliphaz. In the end God did give Job these blessings, after He spoke to him in chapters 38-41 and Job was broken down to judge the pride of his own sinful nature. But Eliphaz had not seen what Job really needed — the same need that Eliphaz himself had.
The kind words carry a second message. Job had no such peace or plenty at that moment, and Eliphaz thought he knew why.
F. B. HoleThese things did mark Job's later days, as we know. But Eliphaz was hinting at something else. He meant that Job had no such prosperity at that moment because God was punishing him for sin — sin that had lain hidden under the surface of his life in the past. Eliphaz closed by confidently claiming that his words were true. "So it is," he declared, for he had searched it out and seen it for himself.
Commentators differ in tone here. Another notes that the same words, said kindly, could have done Job good.
Leslie M. GrantIf Eliphaz had spoken this to Job in a kind and encouraging way, it might have helped him. Instead he was blaming Job for not gaining such blessing, because Job would not confess that he was guilty of secret sin.
Take the accusation away, and the closing lines are still worth reading.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe first address of Eliphaz closes with a wonderful climax, but it rests on the same wrong premises: that Job had sinned, and that he must seek God. Yet Job had not renounced God; he had not left Him. Apart from that, these closing words of Eliphaz declare the gracious power of the Almighty in a most blessed way. Read these verses and take the help and comfort they breathe.
- Picture — the verse promises a settled home and a full flock: shelter and living both secure again.
- Premise — the promise rests on a false assumption: that Job's ruin proved hidden sin. The words are lovely. The diagnosis is wrong.
- Application — people can misuse a true statement. Right words in the wrong hands wound instead of heal, and tone decides which.
- Prophecy — Eliphaz described Job's real ending without knowing it. God fulfilled the sermon he meant only as pressure.
- Path — God restored Job after He spoke and broke him down, not after the confession his friends demanded. Same ending, a different road.
And thou shalt know that thy seed is numerous, and thine offspring as the herb of the earth.
Eliphaz closes his first speech by painting Job's future: a household full of children and a peaceful old age. The promise is beautiful, yet it comes with a condition attached, and Eliphaz aims it at a man who is suffering. Are these words true, wrongly used, or a prophecy the speaker never meant?
Eliphaz ends his speech with a picture of a life put back together. One commentator sets out the sequence:
F. B. HoleThe closing verses speak of God's deliverance coming in; of renewed prosperity. One translation of verse 24 reads, "You shall know that your tent is in peace; and you will survey your fold, and miss nothing." Verse 25 speaks of many descendants. Verse 26 speaks of Job himself coming to his end in ripe old age.
The New Testament quotes Eliphaz, yet God later tells him he has not spoken rightly. Both things stand. The difference lies between the words themselves and the man they were aimed at:
William KellyYou only have to examine the words of Eliphaz to see that in themselves they contain nothing but truth. But if we weigh them as applied to Job, they are inexcusably wrong. How wise is the way of the Lord! How deep and admirable is what Scripture gives us! The New Testament quotes the words of Eliphaz, both in the first letter to the Corinthians and in the letter to the Hebrews. There the application is perfectly good. In the history given in the Old Testament the application was wrong, and the speakers were reproved for it.
So the promise of a flourishing family is a true description of God's goodness. What was wrong was the use Eliphaz made of it against Job.
Every blessing in verses 20 to 27 comes with an "if" attached. Eliphaz names the condition himself:
Leslie M. GrantIn verses 20 to 27 Eliphaz describes the many blessings that would be Job's if he took the advice of Eliphaz. In fact, God did give these blessings to Job later, after He spoke to him in chapters 38 to 41 and Job was broken down to judge the pride of his own sinful nature. But Eliphaz had not seen what Job really needed — the same need that Eliphaz himself had.
Eliphaz was right that Job needed changing. He was wrong about what had to change, and wrong about the way there.
Read alongside the last chapter of the book, this verse reads like a forecast. Eliphaz meant it as a general rule. God meant to apply it to Job:
William KellyThe end would be that "your offspring shall be many, and your descendants as the grass of the earth. You shall come to your grave in ripe old age, like a sheaf gathered up in its time." The remarkable thing is that this was the end. Eliphaz had little idea that it would come true in Job's case. It was more a vague sermon. He called Job to apply it, but he had no idea that God would apply it.
The fulfilment came, but not on Eliphaz's terms. The last verses of the book close where this verse pointed:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinWe have reached the end. It is an end of peace, a perfect day. He sees four generations, and at the ripe old age of 140 years he is gathered to his fathers.
One writer follows the picture to its end, then carries the same confidence into hardship, where nothing looks prosperous at all:
Samuel RidoutThe dwelling of the righteous stays secure, and his descendants will bear witness to the faithfulness of God. Death only closes the beautiful picture with calmness — the aged saint gathered to his fathers like a sheaf of grain fully ripe. We can carry the view further in the clearer light of the New Testament, and ask: "Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? … No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us."
- True. The words hold nothing but truth. It is the way Eliphaz aimed them at Job that commentators call inexcusably wrong.
- Conditional. Eliphaz offers the big family and the ripe old age only if Job takes his advice.
- Misdiagnosed. He saw that Job needed something, but not what Job needed — the same need Eliphaz himself had.
- Fulfilled. The picture did come true — four generations, and death at 140. But it came after God spoke, not after Job took Eliphaz's advice.
- Extended. The secure home and the ripe harvest of a life point further still. In the clearer light of the New Testament, nothing separates us from the love of Christ.
Thou shalt come to the grave in a ripe age, as a shock of corn is brought in in its season.
Eliphaz ends his first speech to Job with a picture of a long life closing in peace. A man is carried to his grave at full age, gathered like grain when the harvest is ready. The words are beautiful. But Eliphaz says them to a man in agony, and he attaches a condition: accept God's correction, and this will be yours.
The final verses of Eliphaz's speech promise a reversal — trouble ending, prosperity returning, a family growing. Read simply, this verse is the last item on that list.
F. B. HoleThe advice given toward the end of his speech was good. Job should not despise the discipline of the Almighty. He should accept the correction, and then the tide of evil would turn and blessing come in. The closing verses speak of God's deliverance coming in, and of renewed prosperity. One rendering of verse 24 reads, "You shall know that your tent is at peace, and you shall inspect your fold and miss nothing." Verse 25 speaks of many descendants, and verse 26 of Job himself coming to his end in ripe old age.
The advice was sound. The assumption behind it was not: Eliphaz treated Job's ruin as correction Job had brought on himself.
Eliphaz has just listed the worst dangers a life can meet. This verse closes the list with a farmer's picture.
Samuel RidoutGoing into detail, Eliphaz mentions the worst outward trials of famine and war, even to the point of destruction, and the inner, bitter pains Job was suffering from at that very moment, caused by the biting tongue. No harmful animal can injure him, for when a person is right with God, He makes all things his friends. The home of the righteous stays secure, and his children will bear witness to the faithfulness of God. Death only closes the beautiful picture with calmness — the aged saint gathered to his fathers like a shock of corn fully ripe.
The point of the sheaf is that none of those dangers cut the man down before his season.
Eliphaz held this out as something Job could have if he took the correction. He never expected God to give it on other terms.
William KellyThe remarkable thing is that this was exactly how it ended. Eliphaz never thought his words would come true in Job's case. He was preaching in a vague sort of way. He called Job to apply it, but he had no idea that God would apply it, and that God would bring Job out more blessed than ever.
So the speech is not worthless. Later Scripture picks up its words, and Job's own story proved true the very sentences he could not bear to hear.
William KellyNotice that the Holy Spirit is pleased to endorse the words of Eliphaz. He does this not only in the earlier revelations, but in the fullest light of the New Testament. We see it in the apostle's use of them when writing to the Corinthians and to the Hebrews. And the outcome in the book itself set a remarkable seal on the truth of his closing words — a seal Eliphaz himself most likely did not expect. At the time, no doubt, those words fell coldly on the ear and heart of the sufferer.
Job did reach a full old age and a restored house. The question the book answers is how he got there.
C. H. MackintoshHappy scene! Precious fruit of divine ministry! What remains? What more is needed? What is left, but for the hand of God to lay the top stone on the beautiful structure? Nor is this lacking, for we read, "the LORD gave Job twice as much as he had before." But how? By what means? Was it by his own independent industry and clever management? No; all is changed. Job is on new moral ground. He has new thoughts of God, new thoughts of himself, new thoughts of his friends, new thoughts of his circumstances; all things have become new.
For Eliphaz, the ripe sheaf was the last frame of the picture. Later light carries the same scene further.
Samuel RidoutYes, we may look on beyond the death of the aged saint to the glorious resurrection, and catch the light of the bright hope of the Morning Star: "the Lord Himself will descend from heaven … and we who are alive … will be caught up … to meet the Lord in the air."
- Counsel. Eliphaz's closing advice was sound: accept God's correction, and blessing follows.
- Picture. The verse frames death as harvest — a life gathered when ripe, not cut down early by famine, war, or violence.
- Blind spot. He offered it as a condition to a suffering man, sure that Job was the one who had to change.
- Fulfilment. Job did reach that full old age — by God's hand, and on new moral ground, not by clever management.
- Horizon. Eliphaz's promise stops at the grave. Later revelation carries the same scene on to resurrection and the Lord's return.
Behold this, we have searched it out, so it is; hear it, and know thou it for thyself.
Eliphaz ends his first long speech to Job with a verdict, not a question, and he signs it in the plural: we looked into this, it holds, now take it in. That raises two questions — what had he searched out, and can one sufferer rest on another man's findings?
This verse closes a speech that runs across two chapters. One writer judges that closing section by what lies under it, not just by how well it is put.
Samuel RidoutThe seventh and closing section of the speech is admirable in expression and excellent in its doctrine, if its inner meaning is seen. In the mouth of Eliphaz, as the high point of his masterful speech, it must be taken with all the qualifications already mentioned.
What lies under it is an assumption: that Job is suffering for his own sins. The same writer weighs the advice first on its own, then with that assumption added.
Samuel RidoutSo, taken by itself, this counsel is good; but remembering the underlying principle that Job is suffering for his sins, it can only irritate. It is as though he were saying: "Sin is common to all, just as trouble is. So humble yourself as a sinner before God, and He will exalt you." It is all the more subtle because it comes so near the truth.
The evidence Eliphaz offers is what he himself has watched happen. His case stands or falls with his own eyes.
F. B. HoleIt is clear then that his argument mainly rests for its strength upon his own powers of observation. In those powers he trusted for his opinion of the meaning of the calamities that had fallen upon Job.
That is why the closing appeal — hear it, and know it for your good — asks more than it can deliver. One writer puts the test as a question:
Leslie M. GrantAgain, it is his own observation that he depends on, but he urges Job to hear it and know it for himself. Can we depend on another person's word to the point of knowing it is fact? No: we need more than another person's observation, we need the Word of God to be certain about any serious matter.
The verse does not say "I have searched it out." Eliphaz closes as a spokesman, certain the other two stand behind him.
William KellyIn the end Eliphaz advises Job to submit to the chastening hand of God, who would surely deliver him from all evil and bless him with all good. And he gives this advice not only in his own name, but in the name of his friends, whose complete agreement he counts on with confidence.
Much of what Eliphaz says is sound in itself. The trouble is that he presses it on a man whose case it does not fit, and he presses it as settled fact.
William KellyThere may be more harm done by things which are true, misunderstood and misapplied, than by many a thing that is false; because misapplied truth gives the apparent authority of God to an error, which has all the more weight because it comes as the truth. If a foolish thing is said, or one plainly false, people despise it; but no believer can slight the truth of God.
This also guards how we read the verse. Scripture records the speech, but that does not make it a word from God.
Samuel RidoutSimilarly here we have an inspired record of what Job and his three friends said, but while most of it was true, it was out of place and misapplied.
The promises of the closing verses did come to pass in Job's life. They came through a road Eliphaz never mapped.
William KellyThe remarkable thing is that this was how it ended. Eliphaz little thought it would come true in Job's case. It was more a sermon in a vague way. He called Job to apply it. But he had no idea that God would apply it, or that God would bring Job out more blessed than before.
- Searched — Eliphaz's authority is what he has watched happen. His whole case rests on his own eyes.
- Claimed — from that base he declares the matter settled and asks Job to take it in. But one man's observation cannot settle a serious matter. For that we need the Word of God.
- Shared — he speaks as "we," counting on his two friends to back him. Agreement is not proof.
- Misapplied — most of what he says is true, yet out of place. Misapplied truth lends God's apparent authority to an error. That makes it weigh more than an open lie.
- Fulfilled — the blessings he describes did come. But God applied them, not Eliphaz, and He brought Job out more blessed than before.