Behold, happy is the man whom +God correcteth; therefore despise not the chastening of the Almighty.
Eliphaz ends his first speech with a real truth: the man God corrects is a happy man, and no one should look down on that correction. The trouble is who he aimed it at — a man he had already decided was hiding secret sin.
Eliphaz's statements are true on their own. The trouble is what he does with them:
F. B. HoleSome of the things Eliphaz says in this chapter are completely true. For example, "Man is born to trouble, as the sparks fly upward," in this world of sin. It is also true that God "takes the wise in their own craftiness," and that "Happy is the man whom God corrects." But we can see that he put all these facts forward in a way that turned them against poor Job.
The whole speech rests on one wrong assumption:
William KellyEvery word may be true in itself. He says it all with great dignity and force. Yet he applies it wrongly and one-sidedly, so in effect the whole thing is wrong. Eliphaz assumes that God is displaying His government right now, and that He measures prosperity or hardship exactly to what people deserve. This is false ground. It spoils the application, especially to someone like Job, who had been handed over to Satan's attacks.
Read closely, the word "happy" is the very thing that shuts Job out of the sentence in the speaker's mind. Kelly points out the irony, and how the sentence came true anyway:
William Kelly"Behold, happy is the man whom God corrects" (ver. 17). He never thought that this was true of Job. He knew that Job was very unhappy, and so he did not count him as one of these at all... Eliphaz never imagined that it would come true in Job's own case. It was a vague sort of sermon; and although he called Job to apply it, he had no idea that God would apply it.
Job felt none of this happiness, and Eliphaz's tone made it worse:
Leslie M. GrantAgain, he voices an excellent principle, "Happy is the man whom God corrects" (v.17). But Job did not feel happy. Of course, God was only beginning His correcting work with Job, and Job did not discern it... If Eliphaz had spoken this to Job in a kind and encouraging way, it might have helped him. Instead he blamed Job for not gaining that blessing by confessing he was guilty of secret sin.
The word behind "chastening" is a teaching word first, and a word for punishment after that:
J. N. DarbyWe have the word musahr, meaning instruction, warning, advice; it covers chastisement too; Prov. 1:3; Job 5:17.
The command not to despise God's discipline has a companion warning elsewhere in Scripture — not to lose heart under it. Each warning rests on a separate fact:
J. N. DarbyGod does not only govern the world for outward blessing. He also governs each person directly and personally — a most gracious and precious truth... The Word draws two conclusions from this truth, that it is God's love. It will not be without a cause in me. It will never be without love in God. So I am not to despise it, because there is a cause in me that makes the Holy God of love act this way. I am not to lose heart, because it is His love that does it. It is the correcting of a son in whom his Father delights.
Correction does not mean God has turned away. It marks out the people He owns:
Edward DennettThe principle is this: "As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent." (v. 19) Hardly anyone would question that this principle applies to those in relationship with Christ (compare Job 5:17-18; Proverbs 3:11-12; Amos 3:2; Hebrews 12:5-8). It lies at the very foundation of the way God governs His people in this world... So this warning comes out of the tenderness and the love of His own heart.
To take chastening well, the sufferer has to look past everything in the foreground — people, circumstances, even the enemy at work in Job's story:
Samuel RidoutNo matter how great the afflictions are, or how often they come, deliverance will arrive in due time... We are led to look past every apparent cause, every human instrument, and even Satan himself. We are led to see that Hand which "will never cause His child a needless tear." So our blessed Lord took that great affliction at the hands of God: "The cup which my Father has given Me, shall I not drink it?"
- Cause. Correction is never random: it will not be without a cause in the one corrected, and never without love in God.
- Word. The word translated "chastening" means instruction, warning and advice. It teaches; it does not just punish.
- Proof. Correction proves relationship, not rejection. It comes out of God's tenderness, and it lies at the foundation of how He deals with His people.
- Response. Two dangers, two answers: do not despise it, because there is a cause in you; do not lose heart, because it is His love doing it.
- Aim. Truth used as an accusation stops helping. Eliphaz's saying was excellent, but he thought prosperity measured a man's standing with God. So he called happy a group he never imagined Job could join.
For he maketh sore, and bindeth up; he woundeth, and his hands make whole.
Eliphaz is speaking to Job, and his words about God are true: the hand that strikes is the hand that heals. The trouble is his target — a man whose suffering had nothing to do with hidden sin.
One hand sends the trouble, and the same hand brings the relief. The quotation below follows an older translation, where the ESV's "his hands heal" reads "His hands make whole."
Samuel RidoutThe relief also comes from the same blessed source: "His hands make whole." How good it is to know that all the trial and the relief — comes from Him.
The wound is His, so there are two wrong responses: making light of it, and giving up under it. Faith looks past every visible cause to the hand behind it.
Samuel RidoutHappy indeed is he who receives chastening at the loving hands of God; we are neither to despise nor to faint under such dealings. No matter how great the afflictions, or how often they come, deliverance will arrive in due time... Let the sufferer only say, "It is your hand," "I know that in faithfulness you have afflicted me." The Scriptures are full of this precious truth for the child of God. This truth leads us to look past all apparent causes, all human instruments, or even Satan himself, to see that Hand which "will never cause His child a needless tear."
Every clause of the verse can be defended. The fault lies in the theory underneath it. Eliphaz thinks God settles every account now, so a man's troubles show what he deserves.
William KellyEvery word may be true in itself; all is said with the utmost dignity and force; yet it is misapplied and one-sided, and so, in effect, wrong as a whole. Eliphaz assumes that God at the present time is displaying His government, giving each person exactly the prosperity or trouble he deserves. This is false ground, and it spoils the application, above all to a man like Job, handed over to Satan's attacks and tested by God to the end — not the bitter end, but the sweet.
Said kindly, the same words could have helped Job.
Leslie M. GrantAgain, he voices an excellent principle, "Happy is the man whom God corrects" (v.17). But Job did not feel happy. Of course, God was only beginning His correcting work with Job, and Job did not discern it... If Eliphaz had spoken this to Job in a kind and encouraging way, it might have helped him. Instead he was blaming Job for not gaining such blessing — for not confessing that he was guilty of secret sin.
Quote this verse at the wrong moment and it does more damage than an obvious mistake. Nobody can dismiss it.
William KellyAbstract truth is altogether useless for the saints of God. Things that are true, but misunderstood and misapplied, may do more harm than many a thing that is false. Misapplied truth gives an error the apparent authority of God. That error carries all the more weight because it comes as the truth. If someone says a foolish thing, or one clearly false, people despise it; but no believer can slight the truth of God. So if people misuse the truth of God — if they use it to crush someone who is an object of intense interest to God at the time, how foreign and offensive to His mind!
The principle itself is not limited to Job. It runs through Scripture, and its root is love.
Edward DennettHardly anyone will question that this principle applies to those in relationship with Christ (compare Job 5:17-18; Proverbs 3:11-12; Amos 3:2; Hebrews 12:5-8, and others). It lies at the very foundation of the way God governs His people in this world... It is therefore out of the tenderness, out of the love of His own heart, that this warning proceeds. He never afflicts willingly.
Eliphaz said it too soon and too coldly, but the end of the book proved it true. Job's healing came, though not through confessing the secret sin Eliphaz imagined.
Samuel RidoutNow Jehovah can lift His hand from the sufferer, and turn all the grievous captivity into full and prosperous recovery. Job can say, I "have received double from the Lord's hand." The relatives and acquaintances who had fled from him and despised him return with gifts and sympathy.
- One hand. The stroke and the healing come from the same hand. The sufferer never has to work out which part of his life God is behind.
- One response. Neither despise the correction nor faint under it; say instead, "It is your hand."
- One motive. He never afflicts willingly. Rebuke and chastening flow from love — a principle running from Job through Proverbs to Hebrews.
- One misuse. True words aimed at the wrong person do more harm than plain error. They lend God's authority to a false verdict.
- One outcome. The hand that wounded Job lifted. He received double, and the verse proved true — though not on Eliphaz's terms.