And it came to pass after Jehovah had spoken these words to Job, that Jehovah said to Eliphaz the Temanite, Mine anger is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends; for ye have not spoken rightly of me, like my servant Job.
God's last word in this book is not to Job but about him. His anger burns against the three friends who came to comfort Job and stayed to accuse him, because they spoke wrongly about God — while Job, for all his rash words under pressure, spoke rightly.
The book opens and closes outside the poetry. Both ends frame everything argued in between.
William KellyThe plan or structure is very distinct. There is a prologue in Job 1, 2 with a corresponding conclusion or epilogue in the last chapter (Job 42:7-17). The question is raised in heaven between God and Satan, the man on earth most concerned being wholly ignorant of it until grace prevailed and the word revealed all.
Note also who is addressed. Eliphaz is named, and one writer sees a reason in that.
William KellyHe singles out the oldest of them. Of the three, this man had spoken with the least bitterness — but he was still guilty, for as the wisest he ought to have known best.
On the surface the three had argued for God's righteousness the whole way through. That is what makes God's verdict startling.
Samuel RidoutBut God does not accept honour at the expense of truth. It is His glory that all His attributes blend in one harmonious light. Can He then accept a defence of His character and ways that is built on a false charge? Such a charge stamps wickedness and hypocrisy on a man of whom He Himself had said, "There is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil." Can He let so monstrous a theory of suffering pass — the theory these men worked out, that suffering is always the unerring finger pointing to wickedness? That it is all in wrath? What then becomes of His testing of His own? What becomes of the sanctifying effect of chastening?
Their failure had a practical cost too. Whatever they said about God did not reach Job.
C. H. MackintoshNo doubt they had spoken of God. But what they said about Him was cloudy, distorted, and false… They completely failed to bring God before the soul of their friend. So they also failed to produce the self-judgment he needed.
Much of what the three said was true in itself. That is where the danger lay, as one writer explains.
William KellyBut God felt seriously about men who claimed to speak properly, while underneath that calm surface they failed to apply the truth of God to the case… Abstract truth is altogether useless for the saints of God. Things that are true, but misunderstood and misapplied, may do more harm than many a thing that is false. Misapplied truth gives the apparent authority of God to an error, and that error carries all the more weight because it comes as the truth… So if someone uses the truth of God wrongly — if he applies it to crush a man who is an object of intense interest to God at the time — how foreign and offensive to His mind!
Job's speeches contain plenty God could not approve. So what did God count as right?
William KellyWhere then was the thing that was right? There is this much we can easily see. He certainly said what was right when he humbled himself completely before God… Job justified God at his own expense. He no longer claimed his own righteousness. He claimed his own nothingness and vileness in dust and ashes before God, whom he acknowledges without reserve to be perfectly right.
Another writer notices what God forgets here, and what He keeps.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHere is a beautiful lesson. Job has confessed and Jehovah has forgiven. He forgets all Job's sinful words; He remembers them no more. But in infinite grace He takes the few sentences scattered through Job's speeches where he honoured the Lord and showed his trust in Him. With these He is well pleased… And so He acknowledges Job as His servant.
God speaks to the three because they said nothing after He answered Job.
William KellyHe observed that none of these three men said a word. They did not profit by it like Job. If they had truly profited by it, they would have joined Job and said, "O Lord, forgive our folly. We have sinned not only against You, but against our dear friend Job." But no. They held their tongues, as so many people do when they are very wrong.
Then comes the turn. God ties Job's own future to the men who wronged him.
An Outline of Sound WordsWhat a great favour God gave His servant! He enabled him to intercede for those who had so greatly abused him, and He accepted his intercession on their behalf… And how good for us to see how God connects Job's intercession with his return to prosperity. We read, "And the LORD restored the fortunes of Job, when he had prayed for his friends" (Job 42:10).
- Right speaking. Job spoke rightly when he humbled himself completely and justified God at his own expense.
- Wrong speaking. The friends made all suffering a punishment. To defend God, they condemned a man God Himself had called blameless.
- Misapplied truth. Truth aimed at the wrong person can do more harm than open falsehood. It lends God's apparent authority to an error.
- Forgiven and named. God remembers Job's rash words no more. He treasures the few that honoured Him, and calls him "my servant" in front of his accusers.
- Prayer that restores. The man they accused becomes the man who prays for them. Job's own restoration follows that prayer.
And now, take for yourselves seven bullocks and seven rams, and go to my servant Job, and offer up for yourselves a burnt-offering; and my servant Job shall pray for you, for him will I accept lest I deal with you [after your] folly, for ye have not spoken of me rightly, like my servant Job.
God has spoken to Job, and Job has repented in dust and ashes. Now God turns to Job's three friends. His anger falls on them, and His remedy puts the sacrifice in their hands and the prayer in the mouth of the man they had accused.
They claimed to speak properly. What God objected to was how they used true words against a man He cared about.
William KellyGod felt gravely about men who claimed to speak properly but completely failed to apply the truth of God to the case… Things that are true, yet misunderstood and misapplied, may do more harm than many a thing that is false. Misapplied truth gives the apparent authority of God to an error, and that error carries all the more weight because it comes as the truth… If someone uses the truth of God wrongly — if he applies it to crush a person God is deeply concerned about at that time — how foreign and offensive to His mind!
There was also what they did not say. Job had taken God's words to heart; they said nothing.
William KellyWhy did God speak to Eliphaz? He noticed that none of these three men said a word. They did not profit by it as Job did. If they had, they would have joined Job and said, "O Lord, forgive our folly; we have sinned not only against You, but against our dear friend Job." But no, they held their tongues, as so many people do when they are very wrong.
Job said many rash things during the long debate. God's approval rests on his last words.
William KellyJob's mistakes are obvious enough. Where then was the thing that was right? … He said the right thing when he humbled himself completely before God… Job said what was right in his last words, when he answered the Lord's appeal to him. There God brought him into His own presence… Job justified God at his own expense. He no longer asserted his own righteousness. He owned his own nothingness and vileness in dust and ashes before God, whom he admits without reserve to be perfectly right.
The distinction God draws is narrow and precise, and one writer insists it is not about who read the situation correctly.
Frederick W. GrantAll of them, Job included, had erred in the interpretation of God's dealings, if that were all; and on that account, first Elihu becomes interpreter for Him, and then God Himself speaks. But Job had spoken rightly of God; and his friends had not.
The number of animals and the kind of offering both matter.
The Christian's FriendThey had sinned, so they needed a sacrifice. Otherwise the Lord must have dealt with them according to their folly. Only the burnt offering He prescribed here could spare them from such dealing… He commanded them to bring seven bulls and seven rams, and the whole formed only one burnt offering. One sacrifice was enough in God's eyes; it was not to be repeated.
Why a burnt offering, and not a sin offering? The date of these events explains it.
William KellyAt this time it does not appear that there were sin offerings. This is a strong sign of the very early date of the book, or rather of the events recorded in it. It must have been before the law. Under the law of Moses a sin offering would of course have been offered. But before the law set out its careful and detailed rules for what sin required, people regularly brought the burnt offering.
God does not simply forgive the three men. Their way back runs through a sacrifice, and through Job.
F. B. HoleThey were to act in a way that did two things. First, it bore witness to sacrifice as the only ground on which sinful men may deal with God. Second, it humbled them, because they had to ask for the prayers of the very man they had been accusing and slandering. They were to be the humble applicants, and Job was to act as a priest of God!
The same pattern appears in the New Testament, where one believer prays for another who has sinned.
J. N. DarbyIf the sin is not a sin to death, and the brother has not repented of it, it may still lead to his being cut off, taken away with a stroke. Then prayer is to be made, and his life will be spared… So, in Job 42:8, Job's intercession turns aside the effect of God's displeasure.
Job's own restoration came at the moment his heart turned toward the men who had hurt him most.
William KellyHe did not only turn their punishment away when Job prayed. He turned Job's own captivity when his heart went out on their behalf… His heart was active in grace. He had seen grace, and now he showed grace — and this for the very people who had wounded him most. No one in the world had wounded Job as his three friends had.
- Wrong speech. God's complaint was not about religious talk in the abstract. It was about true words misapplied to crush a man He cared about.
- Right speech. The words God approved were Job's last ones. He judged himself and justified God at his own expense.
- Sacrifice first. The seven bulls and seven rams made one burnt offering. Without it God would have dealt with them according to their folly.
- Accepted person. Their forgiveness came through Job. The man they had accused became the man who prayed for them.
- Grace returned. God turned Job's captivity at the very moment he prayed for the men who had wounded him most.