And Job answered Jehovah and said,
Job's last speech is not another defence. It is a reply to the God he had spent chapters wishing he could confront — and it settles the whole argument of the book.
This is Job's second reply after God has spoken, and it ends the long dispute:
William KellyWe have now the second and closing answer of Job to Jehovah. The three friends have not a word to say. They are as silent before His solemn intervention and appeal as they were when the sufferer silenced them, and when they could not speak with Elihu. Here is the moral solution of the book. It comes before the formal sentence on the great controversy in verses 7 and 8, and before the open mark of divine blessing that follows in verses 10-17.
The verse also serves as a hinge in the structure of the book:
Samuel RidoutThis portion forms the connecting link between the present part and the last main division of the book. As showing the effect upon Job of Jehovah's words, it belongs to the fourth division; as introductory to the conclusion of the whole book it belongs to the brief fifth division.
What Job now says takes back the ground he had defended for chapter after chapter.
Samuel RidoutAgain Job responds to the piercing, humbling words of Jehovah. Again he repeats his confession in a complete way. He acknowledges that God is all-powerful. Nothing can block His purposes, and those purposes display His power, wisdom and goodness as fully as His works do. There is a complete surrender and reversal of all that he had previously said against God.
The striking feature of Job's reply is where its language comes from. God had asked, "Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" — and Job now says it back about himself.
William KellyThe friends are silent; Job does not believe in his heart only but makes confession with his mouth. He murmurs no more. He resents no more. He questions no more. He openly owns, as something realised in his soul, that Jehovah is able for all things, and that no purpose is withheld from Him… Not a word now about his friends, or about their lack of understanding, honesty and love, however true that was. He judges himself before God. He takes the words God had applied to him — the withering proof of his presumption — and makes them the lowly words of a man who felt his need of learning from God.
Job's complaint had been that he could not find God to plead his case. Now God has drawn near, and the effect is not vindication but self-loathing.
Samuel Ridout"I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear" — Job had been correctly instructed in a general way, but he had only learned about God. "But now my eye sees you." He had been brought face to face with God — not with his eyes, though the awful glory was in the sky — but he had a perception of God in his soul, through his enlightened reason and chiefly through conscience. God had drawn near, personally near. Job was conscious of the indescribable holiness, as well as the power, that belong to Him. Previously he had been in the presence of man, and could more than hold his own with the best of them. In God's presence no creature can boast, and Job was at last in that glorious, holy Presence.
Job's problem was never one bad argument. It was his whole view of God, and everything else stood or fell with it.
C. H. MackintoshHere, then, was the turning point. Job now calls all his earlier statements about God and His ways "words without knowledge." What a confession! What a moment in a man's history, when he discovers that he has been all wrong! What a thorough breakdown! What profound humiliation!… To get right thoughts about God is to begin to get right about everything. If I am wrong about God, I am wrong about myself, wrong about my fellow men, wrong about everything.
The restored fortunes of chapter 42 come after this speech, not before it — and one writer insists the order matters.
F. B. HoleGod blessed Job abundantly, turning his captivity and giving him twice as much as he had before. He did this when Job had prayed for his friends — and not until then… Yet God held that tide of blessing back until Job was deeply changed in spirit and character. Job, therefore, was not a loser but a gainer by God's dealings, even in material things.
- Answer. Job's closing reply to God is what the whole book drives at. The friends have nothing left to say. The dispute is settled here, before God gives His verdict and His blessing.
- Reversal. His words take back everything he had argued against God. It is a complete surrender, not a partial one.
- Echo. He turns God's own charge on himself. He drops the subject of his friends. Self-judgment replaces accusation.
- Sight. Job could hold his own with any man. In God's presence no one can boast. Hearing about God became seeing Him.
- Gain. Restoration follows the changed man, not the won argument. Job came out of God's dealings richer, not poorer.
I know that thou canst do everything, and that thou canst be hindered in no thought of thine.
For many chapters Job has argued, protested, and demanded a hearing. Then God answers out of the whirlwind, and Job's reply confesses the two things he had questioned: God's power and God's plans.
Job does not keep this to himself. He says it out loud, and the complaining is over.
William KellyThe friends are silent; Job does not believe in his heart only but makes confession with his mouth. He murmurs no more, he resents no more, he questions no more. He now admits openly, as something he knows in his soul, that the Lord is able for all things, and that no purpose is withheld from Him. Evil in men or Satan, ruin everywhere in this fallen world, had touched Him in no way at all.
Job's earlier speeches came out of a gap in his knowledge of God. Another man in the Bible had to learn the same thing.
Leslie M. GrantHe now realises that ignorance of God had driven his earlier words. God "can do everything." This reminds us of Peter's words to the Lord Jesus, "Lord, you know everything" (John 21:17). Peter needed the same lesson Job needed. He too had shown too much confidence in the flesh when he insisted that he would not deny the Lord Jesus, even if all the others did.
Job had spoken against God. Now he takes all of it back, and he sees more in God's purposes than raw strength.
Samuel RidoutHe acknowledges God's omnipotence, and that He cannot be thwarted in His purposes, which exhibit His power, wisdom and goodness as fully as do His works. There is a complete surrender and reversal of all that he had previously said against God.
One writer takes the same truth beyond Job's own life. God's purpose settles what is coming for the whole world.
An Outline of Sound WordsHis counsel will stand, and He will do all His pleasure… God will show His supremacy. He will secure, for His own glory and pleasure, all that He has purposed for the blessing of this poor world.
Commentators differ here, because translators render the Hebrew in two ways. Some read the line as God's purpose being unstoppable. Others follow an older translation, "no thought can be withheld from You," and read it as God knowing every thought a man has.
H. H. SnellIn God's presence, as it were under God's eye, Job learned by experience that He was Almighty. He learned that God searches every thought of the heart.
Job's "I know" is not new information. What changed is the way he holds it.
William Kelly"Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?" Why, it was himself; he owns it. Then comes his great confession: "I had heard of You by the hearing of the ear." I knew it as a report outside myself. But now I have made it my own. I have applied it to my own soul, my own circumstances, my own state — "but now my eye sees You. Therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes." That was the great moral victory God had won.
Once someone admits that God can do all things, putting God on trial has nowhere left to stand.
C. H. MackintoshIf man could fathom the government of God, he would no longer be man, but God… If God is to be God, then His ways, the workings of His government, the mysteries of His providence, His purposes, His counsels and His judgments must lie far beyond the reach of the greatest human or angelic mind. No angel, no man and no devil can comprehend God… When the soul takes this place, all unbelieving questions come to an end. Until then there is little use in discussion.
And the same confession, held by anyone, becomes a resting place rather than a defeat:
F. A. HughesWhatever may happen in this world, we can confidently rest in the knowledge that God can "do everything, and that no thought can be withheld from You."
- Cause — Job's wrong words came from not knowing God. Here he admits that the real problem was his ignorance, not God's injustice.
- Knowledge — He had heard of God by report; now his eye sees Him, and second-hand knowledge becomes his own.
- Power — God can do all things, so nothing stops His purposes. They show His wisdom and goodness, not just His strength.
- Reach — The purpose that ruled Job's life rules the world too. God will secure everything He has planned for it.
- Result — Take this place, and the arguing with God ends.
Who is he that obscureth counsel without knowledge? therefore have I uttered what I did not understand; things too wonderful for me, which I knew not.
Job has just heard God speak, and he answers by turning God's own question against himself. This verse is the hinge. A man who argued his case for chapters now admits he had been talking about matters he never understood.
The words "who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?" are not Job's invention. He is quoting the opening question God had put to him, and by quoting it he agrees with it. Some readers have aimed that question at Elihu, one of the men who had spoken to Job.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHere we have his full answer, his complete bowing down before Jehovah. He acknowledges first Jehovah's supreme power. He is all-powerful and can do all things. Then he quotes Jehovah's own words (38:2; 40:2). "You have asked me, Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?" It is strange that some interpreters misuse these words, as if the Lord were rebuking Elihu again. No — as we have shown before, He rebukes Job for the wild and reckless charges he had made against the Lord. And now Job acknowledges that Jehovah's rebuke is right.
To darken counsel is to throw a shadow over God's ways by talking about them. Job's speeches had not cleared the mystery of his suffering; they had made it darker.
Samuel RidoutQuoting Jehovah's own words, he asks himself, Who is he who darkens counsel? — who dares to throw a shadow upon the Almighty! There are mysteries in His ways, as there are in all creation and providence. But no one gains anything by rebelling against these mysteries of God's counsel. He did not even know the simplest truths of nature in their hidden meaning. Yet he had spoken of things beyond the reach of a limited mind, and so he had spoken folly. How different he had been from the devout psalmist: "Such knowledge is too wonderful for me; it is high, I cannot attain it" (Ps. 139:6). He had intruded into the things of God, and had dared to speak evil of divine omnipotence and goodness!
Job's confession is about reach, not honesty. He had handled subjects far above him, and behind that lay how little he knew of God.
Leslie M. GrantHe now realises that his earlier words came out of ignorance of God, who "can do everything." This reminds us of Peter's words to the Lord Jesus, "Lord, you know everything" (John 21:17). Peter had to learn the same lesson as Job. He too had trusted himself too much, insisting that he would never deny the Lord Jesus, even if everyone else did. Job fully admits to the Lord that he had spoken without knowing what he was saying — things too wonderful for him. He had tried to handle matters far beyond his understanding, and he found himself humiliated.
Job had spent chapter after chapter answering his friends. Notice who is missing from his confession.
William KellyHe complains no more, he resents no more, he questions no more. He openly owns, as something real in his soul, that Jehovah is able to do all things, and that no purpose is withheld from Him. Evil in men or Satan, and ruin everywhere in this fallen world, had touched Him in no way. His own difficulties and arguments were only the unsubmissive heart of a man who darkened counsel without knowledge, as Jehovah Himself had said at the start. Now it was Job who declared his own ignorance. He did not understand — things too wonderful for him that he did not know. Not a word now about his friends, or their lack of intelligence, honesty and charity, however true that was. He judges himself before God. He takes the words God had used against him — the crushing proof of his presumption — and makes them his own. They become the humble words of a man who felt his need to learn from God, and who wanted that learning worked in him.
Job's outward life was excellent. The problem was what that excellence had done to his opinion of himself.
F. B. HoleJob had opened his mouth "in vain," or "in vanity." His words were many, but they carried no knowledge. The excellence of Job's outward life had betrayed him into an inward spirit of vanity. That vanity was the root of his failure to truly know himself. Job himself confesses this in Job 42:3.
- Knowledge missing. Job's speeches were many but empty. Many words are not the same as understanding, and God's question exposes the gap.
- Knowledge borrowed. He repeats God's own words instead of building a defence. That is the mark of a rebuke he now accepts as true.
- Knowledge overreached. He reached for matters beyond any creature's grasp. The reaching cast a shadow over God's ways instead of clearing them.
- Knowledge turned inward. The friends vanish from his answer. The man who judged everyone else now judges himself before God.
- Knowledge at the root. A fine outward life had bred inward vanity. His real ignorance was not about God's world but about himself.
Hear, I beseech thee, and I will speak I will demand of thee, and inform me.
Here Job takes God's own words onto his own lips, and they sound like a demand for a hearing. Yet he has just admitted he spoke about things he did not understand.
The line is not Job's invention. He repeats back to God the challenge God had already thrown at him — and he does it twice in this short speech.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHere we have his full answer, his complete prostration before Jehovah. He acknowledges first Jehovah's supreme power. He is omnipotent and can do all things. Then he quotes Jehovah's own words (38:2; 40:2). You asked me, "Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?" … And now Job acknowledges that Jehovah's rebuke is right. It is all true, he says, I uttered things I did not understand, things too wonderful for me, beyond my grasp. Hear me now, Jehovah, I will speak. Once more he quotes Jehovah's word. You have said (40:2), "I ask of you, answer Me." Here then is MY answer, he replies.
Repeating a question can be defiance or surrender. Here the repeating is Job bowing.
Samuel RidoutJob is still applying Jehovah's words to himself. He asks, "Who is this?" and says, "Hear, and I will speak." It is as though he would bow low to these questions by repeating them, and so give his answer to his divine Questioner. And what an answer it is! It is the only answer human pride can give to God: "I have heard of You by the hearing of the ear." Job had received right instruction in a general way, but he had only learned about God. "But now my eye sees You."
Earlier Job had asked for this meeting, and was sure how it would go. He gets it, with the roles reversed.
F. B. HoleLook back at the beginning of Job 23. There Job had spoken with self-confidence about his wish to meet God. He felt sure he could set out his case before Him, fill his mouth with arguments, and know the words in which God would answer him. Now the moment came for that wish to come true. Jehovah tells him to brace himself like a man and to be ready to answer the voice of God. The questioning would now come from God.
Job had gone further than wanting a hearing. He had said he would come near to God as a prince — and God took up the boast.
J. T. MawsonHe winds up what he thought would be his final speech with a challenge to the Almighty Himself. "Behold, my desire is that the Almighty would answer me," he cries. "I would declare to Him the number of my steps. AS A PRINCE I WOULD GO NEAR TO HIM." … The Almighty took up his challenge. He had heard all his proud words and now He answers him and demands that Job open his mouth again. "Gird up your loins like a man; for I will question you, and you answer Me" (chap. 38:3).
Job's earlier questions had been protests. The same words can come from two very different hearts, and that difference decides everything.
H. L. RossierYou can ask any question in two ways. You can ask in humility, with a sincere desire to learn. Or you can ask in presumptuous rebellion against the answer, whatever it may be. In the first case the questioner truly takes the place of a learner, and that is the right thing for him to do. In the second case he assumes there is no satisfactory answer, or that the answer is certainly being kept from him.
Job now takes the place of the learner. He has stopped instructing God and started listening.
God's questions left Job with nothing to say for himself.
William KellyGod laid Job low on every point. He overwhelmed him in every way with a sense of his own ignorance and presumption. Job had talked about the far more wonderful ways of a God who deals with a man's heart, a man's soul, a man's circumstances now. The Lord does not put that last part into words. It was God showing His majesty, power, wisdom and goodness in outward things. If that were true of God, how much more in spiritual things?
Nothing his friends said had reached him this way.
F. B. HoleThese moments in the presence of God had produced a result which all the talk of the three friends, and even of Elihu, had not achieved. This man stood out among men, and even God Himself had given him a testimonial. Yet he had discovered his own utter sinfulness in the deepest springs of his being. A discovery we all in our turn have to make!
- Challenge — God told Job to brace himself and answer Him. Job now says those same words back to God.
- Echo — Repeating the question is his way of bowing to it. He hands the argument over instead of continuing it.
- Learner — The same question can come from humility or from rebellion. Job has moved from rebellion to humility.
- Sight — What he had known by report he now knows by encounter: heard by the ear, then seen with the eye.
- Result — Questions he could not answer did what all the talk of his friends could not. They laid him low and showed him to himself.
I had heard of thee by the hearing of the ear, but now mine eye seeth thee
Job has spent long chapters defending himself and demanding an answer from God. Now God is near, and Job's knowledge of Him turns first-hand — at the cost of everything he thought of himself.
Job sets two ways of knowing God side by side. The second is not seeing with the eyes:
F. B. HolePreviously he had known of Him by "the hearing of the ear"; that is, by tradition. But now, said he, "my eye sees you"; that is, he grasped God in a new and living way. He did not "see" in a literal sense, as 1 Timothy 6:16 assures us, yet the eye is only the organ of sight and it is the mind that sees. Again and again we say, "I see," when something that made no appeal to our eyes has sunk into our minds.
Until now Job had only ever measured himself against men:
Samuel RidoutHe perceived God in his soul, by his enlightened reason and above all by conscience. God had drawn near, personally near, and Job was conscious of that indescribable holiness, as well as power, that belong to Him. Previously he had been in the presence of man, and could more than hold his own with the best of them. In God's presence no creature can boast... All the "filthy rags" of an imagined personal righteousness dropped from him.
In the next verse Job's loathing lands on something deeper than his words:
Leslie M. GrantThough Job had heard something about the Lord, it was not enough to meet Job's actual need. Now he came face to face with the greatness and glory of the Lord. The result was, "I abhor myself." He did not abhor only what he had done. He abhorred himself. That self was the root of whatever he may have done, and God was dealing with the root: the pride of Job's very character.
Job had once described his days of honour with these same two senses. The reversal is exact:
F. B. HoleThere was a time when things were very different for Job. He was prosperous, flourishing, and very pleased with what he had done. Then he stated, "when the ear heard me, then it blessed me; and when the eye saw me it gave witness to me." Now he says, "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you. Therefore I abhor myself and repent in dust and ashes." When the eye was filled with Job there was one story to tell. When Jehovah filled the vision, and Job appeared only in the light of His presence, the story was quite another.
Job did not discover himself by looking inward. The order is fixed:
James BoydThe light that shows us what we are is the light of God. So our knowledge of Him always runs ahead of our knowledge of ourselves: "My eye sees you: therefore I abhor myself." Peter learned what a sinful man he was in the presence of the Saviour. This is what holds us up as we come to know ourselves.
Job's long discipline had a goal, and here it is reached:
J. N. DarbyThis is the effect of having seen God, and of finding himself in His presence. God's work was finished — the work of His perfect goodness. That goodness would not leave Job until it had made him know himself, and had brought him into God's own presence. The discipline reached its object, and Job now has more blessings around him than before.
God teaches in two schools, and Bible study is only one of them:
F. B. HoleWe do not underrate the importance of Bible study... There are things that can only be learned in God's Bible-study School... But to graduate in the knowledge of God that comes by experience, we must enter His school of discipline — a school whose course lasts a lifetime.
- Hearing — Job's old knowledge came by tradition. It was real, but it was not enough.
- Seeing — this is no vision for the eyes. God draws near, and the mind and conscience take Him in.
- Self — the sight exposes more than bad words. Job abhors the root: the pride of his own character.
- Order — God is seen first. Self-knowledge follows the light, so no one finds himself out by looking inward.
- End — this was God's aim all along. Once Job knows himself in God's presence, the discipline is done and blessing follows.
Wherefore I abhor [myself], and repent in dust and ashes.
God has just spoken to Job out of the whirlwind, and these are Job's closing words. Here the book answers the question it has been driving at: what brings a good man to the end of himself? (Older translations read "I abhor myself"; the ESV renders it "I despise myself.")
Job's self-loathing follows from what verse 5 says: he has seen God. Studying the huge creatures God had just described could never have produced it:
William Kelly"I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you." It was nothing external now; no mere distant rumour. "Now my eye sees you. Therefore I abhor myself." Do you think that searching into the structure or habits of behemoth and leviathan would have led to anything of the sort? Certainly not. He was dealing with God Himself, who used them for that very purpose, and so turned Job from everything else to Himself.
Job could hold his own against his human critics. Before God he collapses — and what he abhors is not just his speeches:
Samuel RidoutBefore this, Job had been in the presence of men, and he could more than hold his own with the best of them. In God's presence no creature can boast, and Job was at last in that glorious, holy Presence. All the "filthy rags" of an imagined personal righteousness dropped from him, and he stood in all the naked horror of pride and rebellion against God. "Therefore I abhor" — what? The whole past, every unjust suspicion, every hot accusation, every despairing, restless lament? Yes, more, the author and source of these — "I abhor myself." Who can doubt that Job's repentance goes beyond judging his words? He judged himself. The very absence of the pronoun stresses the thought: "I abhor." I stand out before everyone, described by one word — "abhor."
Job stops defending himself and agrees with God about himself. That agreement is what "repent" means here:
J. N. DarbyNow it is not a question of condemnation but of sin. When the sinner has judged himself, the fear of condemnation has passed away... So Job takes God's side against himself. He laid himself before God, and abhorred himself; and then he repents in dust and ashes; for it is only in the presence of God that we learn repentance. True repentance, at its fullest, is this: our sin is so fully brought out that we take God's side of the question. We judge ourselves, and we justify Him. Then it is that He justifies us, and makes us accepted in the Beloved.
Agreeing that human nature is corrupt costs nothing. Job speaks in the singular:
C. H. MackintoshIt is one thing to say "We are all vile." It is quite another to feel, deep down in the heart, that "I am vile." We can only learn that, and keep living in it, in the immediate presence of God. The two things must always go together: "My eye sees You" — "Therefore I abhor myself." As the light of what God is shines in on what I am, I abhor myself... It is of little use to claim very low thoughts of self while we are quick to resent any injury done to us — any imagined insult, slight, or put-down.
Job ends up in the dust. Writers read that low place as the aim of the whole story:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe puzzle of the book of Job is solved. God allowed the afflictions to come on His servant Job. It was not only to show His power. It was for Job's good, to draw him into the place of nearness and blessing. And that place is the dust, "in dust and in ashes."
Job was devout in his prosperous days too. What was missing was this sentence, and God drew it out of him for a reason:
Samuel RidoutThese are the words for which we may say the Lord had long been listening. He had not heard them in the days of the patriarch's prosperity, though his piety was unquestioned... God's purpose was to draw out just this confession. And why? To humiliate him? No, but to give him the true glory — to let him, out of the dust, see the glory of the Lord, and never again to have a cloud upon his soul.
- Sight — Report about God left Job intact; a personal view of God undid him. Verse 5 causes verse 6.
- Self — He does not renounce his arguments only. He renounces the person behind them.
- Side — Repentance here is Job changing sides: judging himself, justifying God. Once a person judges himself, the fear of condemnation goes and acceptance follows.
- Singular — "We are all vile" is a doctrine; "I am vile" is repentance. The test is whether small insults still sting.
- Soil — Dust and ashes look like the ruin of Job's life. They are the place of nearness God aimed at all along, and where true glory is given.
And it came to pass after Jehovah had spoken these words to Job, that Jehovah said to Eliphaz the Temanite, Mine anger is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends; for ye have not spoken rightly of me, like my servant Job.
God's last word in this book is not to Job but about him. His anger burns against the three friends who came to comfort Job and stayed to accuse him, because they spoke wrongly about God — while Job, for all his rash words under pressure, spoke rightly.
The book opens and closes outside the poetry. Both ends frame everything argued in between.
William KellyThe plan or structure is very distinct. There is a prologue in Job 1, 2 with a corresponding conclusion or epilogue in the last chapter (Job 42:7-17). The question is raised in heaven between God and Satan, the man on earth most concerned being wholly ignorant of it until grace prevailed and the word revealed all.
Note also who is addressed. Eliphaz is named, and one writer sees a reason in that.
William KellyHe singles out the oldest of them. Of the three, this man had spoken with the least bitterness — but he was still guilty, for as the wisest he ought to have known best.
On the surface the three had argued for God's righteousness the whole way through. That is what makes God's verdict startling.
Samuel RidoutBut God does not accept honour at the expense of truth. It is His glory that all His attributes blend in one harmonious light. Can He then accept a defence of His character and ways that is built on a false charge? Such a charge stamps wickedness and hypocrisy on a man of whom He Himself had said, "There is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil." Can He let so monstrous a theory of suffering pass — the theory these men worked out, that suffering is always the unerring finger pointing to wickedness? That it is all in wrath? What then becomes of His testing of His own? What becomes of the sanctifying effect of chastening?
Their failure had a practical cost too. Whatever they said about God did not reach Job.
C. H. MackintoshNo doubt they had spoken of God. But what they said about Him was cloudy, distorted, and false… They completely failed to bring God before the soul of their friend. So they also failed to produce the self-judgment he needed.
Much of what the three said was true in itself. That is where the danger lay, as one writer explains.
William KellyBut God felt seriously about men who claimed to speak properly, while underneath that calm surface they failed to apply the truth of God to the case… Abstract truth is altogether useless for the saints of God. Things that are true, but misunderstood and misapplied, may do more harm than many a thing that is false. Misapplied truth gives the apparent authority of God to an error, and that error carries all the more weight because it comes as the truth… So if someone uses the truth of God wrongly — if he applies it to crush a man who is an object of intense interest to God at the time — how foreign and offensive to His mind!
Job's speeches contain plenty God could not approve. So what did God count as right?
William KellyWhere then was the thing that was right? There is this much we can easily see. He certainly said what was right when he humbled himself completely before God… Job justified God at his own expense. He no longer claimed his own righteousness. He claimed his own nothingness and vileness in dust and ashes before God, whom he acknowledges without reserve to be perfectly right.
Another writer notices what God forgets here, and what He keeps.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHere is a beautiful lesson. Job has confessed and Jehovah has forgiven. He forgets all Job's sinful words; He remembers them no more. But in infinite grace He takes the few sentences scattered through Job's speeches where he honoured the Lord and showed his trust in Him. With these He is well pleased… And so He acknowledges Job as His servant.
God speaks to the three because they said nothing after He answered Job.
William KellyHe observed that none of these three men said a word. They did not profit by it like Job. If they had truly profited by it, they would have joined Job and said, "O Lord, forgive our folly. We have sinned not only against You, but against our dear friend Job." But no. They held their tongues, as so many people do when they are very wrong.
Then comes the turn. God ties Job's own future to the men who wronged him.
An Outline of Sound WordsWhat a great favour God gave His servant! He enabled him to intercede for those who had so greatly abused him, and He accepted his intercession on their behalf… And how good for us to see how God connects Job's intercession with his return to prosperity. We read, "And the LORD restored the fortunes of Job, when he had prayed for his friends" (Job 42:10).
- Right speaking. Job spoke rightly when he humbled himself completely and justified God at his own expense.
- Wrong speaking. The friends made all suffering a punishment. To defend God, they condemned a man God Himself had called blameless.
- Misapplied truth. Truth aimed at the wrong person can do more harm than open falsehood. It lends God's apparent authority to an error.
- Forgiven and named. God remembers Job's rash words no more. He treasures the few that honoured Him, and calls him "my servant" in front of his accusers.
- Prayer that restores. The man they accused becomes the man who prays for them. Job's own restoration follows that prayer.
And now, take for yourselves seven bullocks and seven rams, and go to my servant Job, and offer up for yourselves a burnt-offering; and my servant Job shall pray for you, for him will I accept lest I deal with you [after your] folly, for ye have not spoken of me rightly, like my servant Job.
God has spoken to Job, and Job has repented in dust and ashes. Now God turns to Job's three friends. His anger falls on them, and His remedy puts the sacrifice in their hands and the prayer in the mouth of the man they had accused.
They claimed to speak properly. What God objected to was how they used true words against a man He cared about.
William KellyGod felt gravely about men who claimed to speak properly but completely failed to apply the truth of God to the case… Things that are true, yet misunderstood and misapplied, may do more harm than many a thing that is false. Misapplied truth gives the apparent authority of God to an error, and that error carries all the more weight because it comes as the truth… If someone uses the truth of God wrongly — if he applies it to crush a person God is deeply concerned about at that time — how foreign and offensive to His mind!
There was also what they did not say. Job had taken God's words to heart; they said nothing.
William KellyWhy did God speak to Eliphaz? He noticed that none of these three men said a word. They did not profit by it as Job did. If they had, they would have joined Job and said, "O Lord, forgive our folly; we have sinned not only against You, but against our dear friend Job." But no, they held their tongues, as so many people do when they are very wrong.
Job said many rash things during the long debate. God's approval rests on his last words.
William KellyJob's mistakes are obvious enough. Where then was the thing that was right? … He said the right thing when he humbled himself completely before God… Job said what was right in his last words, when he answered the Lord's appeal to him. There God brought him into His own presence… Job justified God at his own expense. He no longer asserted his own righteousness. He owned his own nothingness and vileness in dust and ashes before God, whom he admits without reserve to be perfectly right.
The distinction God draws is narrow and precise, and one writer insists it is not about who read the situation correctly.
Frederick W. GrantAll of them, Job included, had erred in the interpretation of God's dealings, if that were all; and on that account, first Elihu becomes interpreter for Him, and then God Himself speaks. But Job had spoken rightly of God; and his friends had not.
The number of animals and the kind of offering both matter.
The Christian's FriendThey had sinned, so they needed a sacrifice. Otherwise the Lord must have dealt with them according to their folly. Only the burnt offering He prescribed here could spare them from such dealing… He commanded them to bring seven bulls and seven rams, and the whole formed only one burnt offering. One sacrifice was enough in God's eyes; it was not to be repeated.
Why a burnt offering, and not a sin offering? The date of these events explains it.
William KellyAt this time it does not appear that there were sin offerings. This is a strong sign of the very early date of the book, or rather of the events recorded in it. It must have been before the law. Under the law of Moses a sin offering would of course have been offered. But before the law set out its careful and detailed rules for what sin required, people regularly brought the burnt offering.
God does not simply forgive the three men. Their way back runs through a sacrifice, and through Job.
F. B. HoleThey were to act in a way that did two things. First, it bore witness to sacrifice as the only ground on which sinful men may deal with God. Second, it humbled them, because they had to ask for the prayers of the very man they had been accusing and slandering. They were to be the humble applicants, and Job was to act as a priest of God!
The same pattern appears in the New Testament, where one believer prays for another who has sinned.
J. N. DarbyIf the sin is not a sin to death, and the brother has not repented of it, it may still lead to his being cut off, taken away with a stroke. Then prayer is to be made, and his life will be spared… So, in Job 42:8, Job's intercession turns aside the effect of God's displeasure.
Job's own restoration came at the moment his heart turned toward the men who had hurt him most.
William KellyHe did not only turn their punishment away when Job prayed. He turned Job's own captivity when his heart went out on their behalf… His heart was active in grace. He had seen grace, and now he showed grace — and this for the very people who had wounded him most. No one in the world had wounded Job as his three friends had.
- Wrong speech. God's complaint was not about religious talk in the abstract. It was about true words misapplied to crush a man He cared about.
- Right speech. The words God approved were Job's last ones. He judged himself and justified God at his own expense.
- Sacrifice first. The seven bulls and seven rams made one burnt offering. Without it God would have dealt with them according to their folly.
- Accepted person. Their forgiveness came through Job. The man they had accused became the man who prayed for them.
- Grace returned. God turned Job's captivity at the very moment he prayed for the men who had wounded him most.
Then Eliphaz the Temanite, and Bildad the Shuhite, and Zophar the Naamathite, went and did according as Jehovah had said unto them; and Jehovah accepted Job.
Job's three friends had spent the whole book sitting in judgment on him. Now God sends them to Job with animals for sacrifice, and the verse ends with a verdict nobody expected: God receives the man they had condemned.
For chapters these three had sat as judges over Job's case. God's instruction turned that around.
William KellyIt was all perfectly clear now; so clear, that he could act for those who were wrong. "Otherwise I will deal with you according to your folly, for you have not spoken of Me what is right, as My servant Job has." Now they were humbled. So the men who had been sitting in judgment on Job took the place of offenders against God, and they looked to Job to plead with the Lord for them.
God did not simply correct their words. He sent them for a sacrifice first.
The Christian's FriendThey had sinned, so they needed a sacrifice, otherwise the Lord would have had to deal with them according to their folly. So nothing could free them from that dealing except the burnt offering God prescribed here. A sacrifice can therefore deal with the question of sin once it has been committed. Job's friends proved this. God commanded them to bring seven bulls and seven rams — seven of each kind, a perfect number. The whole made only one burnt offering, for one sacrifice was enough in God's eyes; it was not to be repeated. Nothing was to be lacking that would assure them their sin was settled, perfectly and for ever. God in His grace provided this.
The kind of offering named is itself a clue about when these events happened.
William KellyAt this time there do not seem to have been sin offerings. That is no small hint of how early the book is, or rather how early the events it records are. All this must have happened before the law. Under the law given in Leviticus they would of course have offered a sin offering. But before the law gave that careful and detailed instruction for cases of sin, people regularly offered the burnt offering.
Picture the men. The one praying was still sick and still ruined.
F. B. HoleIt must have been an extraordinary scene. Verse 10 shows that the change in Job's body and in his fortunes came only after he prayed for his friends. Here were the three friends, well-off gentlemen of the east, with their sacrifices. And here was Job, a wasted figure covered with boils. Yet this poor physical wreck is in touch with God, and able to hold up his hands in gracious and priestly intercession.
The verse closes with God's own verdict on Job. One writer traces where that acceptance finally rests.
F. B. HoleJob's prayer was effective since he was now right with God, and not only right with his friends. We have the plain statement, "The LORD accepted Job." The man who condemned and disowned himself stands accepted before God. This has always been God's way… But we have to move on to the New Testament to find the basis on which the acceptance rests. The character of the acceptance that is ours today is found in the words, "blessed us in the Beloved" (Eph. 1:6). In Job's day this had not yet come to light.
A note on wording: older translations end this verse "the LORD accepted Job," and read Ephesians 1:6 as "accepted in the Beloved." The ESV has "accepted Job's prayer" and "blessed us in the Beloved."
Job praying for the men who wronged him reminded one writer of someone greater.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinWhat a sweet scene this is, as Job prays for his humbled friends. How it again reminds us of Him who always lives to make intercession for His people. God has accepted Him in His great sacrificial work on the cross, and we are accepted in Him.
This scene has a direct use when believers fall out with one another.
F. B. HoleLet us not miss how all this applies to ourselves. Disputes arise among brothers and sisters in Christ. If they happen away from the presence of God, debate can be fierce and division can follow. But let them feel the presence of God, let them judge and hate self, and a completely different spirit takes over and they reach a right solution.
- Sin. The friends' wrong words about God were real sin, and nothing could shield them from God dealing with them except the burnt offering He named.
- Sacrifice. Seven bulls and seven rams together made one offering — one sacrifice was enough in God's eyes, never to be repeated.
- Intercessor. God did not bypass the man they had wounded; He sent them to him, and a boil-covered Job lifted priestly hands for them.
- Accepted. The man who had just disowned himself is the man God receives — and the New Testament names the ground of it, "blessed us in the Beloved."
- Us. Do the same with disputes among believers: bring them into God's presence, judge self, and a different spirit takes over.