Shall [mortal] man be more just than +God? Shall a man be purer than his Maker?
Eliphaz answers his suffering friend by telling him about a vision in the night. A voice asked him two questions, and both are true. But can a true statement about God still be the wrong word to a broken man?
Fear and trembling came with this vision. One writer reads that reaction as a clue to what filled Eliphaz.
William KellyHe refers to what he saw or heard then. "Now a thing was secretly brought to me, and my ear received a little of it. In thoughts from the visions of the night, when deep sleep falls on men. Fear came upon me, and trembling" — clearly he did not have enough of grace; grace does not make people afraid in this way. It is judgment that does so, and this is what these good men are full of; they were full of the spirit of judgment.
The question sets man beside God, not beside other men. Older translations read "more just than God." One writer shows how the word "mortal" carries part of the argument.
Samuel Ridout"Shall mortal man be more just than God?" — or "just before God," in His presence. Compared with His holiness, even the heavenly beings are unclean. The seraphim veil their faces as they proclaim Him. How much less can mortal man, whose mortality is a witness of his sin, boast. His breath is in his nostrils. His life is like a tale soon told, over in a day — like the short-lived moth.
Writers agree that what the voice said cannot be argued with, on either count.
F. B. HoleHe begins to tell of a terrifying experience of his own. He saw some ghostly figure, and heard a warning about man's frailty and impurity in the presence of his Maker. What Eliphaz heard is perfectly true. No mortal man can be more pure or just than God. In both he falls infinitely short of God's glory.
Eliphaz took the message as a description of Job. One writer turns it into a warning for anyone who hears teaching with someone else in mind.
Leslie M. GrantHow true and fitting such words are for all mankind, but Eliphaz was applying them only to Job, not to himself, because Eliphaz did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "broken in pieces." This had happened to Job, so Eliphaz took his vision as applying directly to Job. But a vision or dream is meant to apply directly to the one who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. In the same way, we may hear good ministry which we think fits others better than ourselves.
Because no wrong had been found in Job, the whole speech becomes an example of the judging we are told to avoid.
William KellyThat is the very thing we must not do. "Judge not, that you be not judged." When we find evil in someone who bears the Lord's name, we are bound to judge him; but no one found any evil in Job at all. And when we find no evil, we are bound not to judge; we are not to give way to our own thoughts; we are to wait on God to make it all plain… [The vision] is all very true, but it did not apply to the case at all.
The voice leaves the question hanging. Job asks it again later, and one writer shows where the answer comes.
An Outline of Sound WordsIn Job 9:2 Job asks, "How can a man be in the right before God?" The answer comes from the Lord Jesus. He spoke a parable "to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous." The proud Pharisee paraded his self-righteousness before God, and he stands condemned. The repentant tax collector "beat his breast, saying, God, be merciful to me, a sinner!" He "went down to his house justified, rather than the other" (Luke 18:9–14). The Lord answered Job's question by showing that the way to be just with God is by condemning ourselves before Him, confessing in true sorrow that we are sinners, and casting ourselves on His mercy. The full answer waited for the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus. In the letter to the Romans we learn that God justifies us by His grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, on the principle of faith.
- True. No mortal man is more just or more pure than his Maker; measured against God, man "falls infinitely short of God's glory."
- Mortal. The word carries the argument: a life as brief as a moth's is itself a witness of sin, so boasting before God is absurd.
- Yours. A vision in the night is meant first for the man who receives it. Eliphaz aimed it at Job and left himself out, as we do with good teaching.
- Judged. No one found evil in Job, so true words became a weapon. Where we find no evil, we are not to judge but to wait on God.
- Answered. The question hangs open here. The tax collector's cry for mercy begins the answer; Christ's death and resurrection complete it.
Lo, he trusteth not his servants, and his angels he chargeth with folly
Eliphaz has just told Job about a frightening experience of his own, and here he reports the warning he heard. The warning measures every creature against God, and it starts not with man but with God's servants in heaven. The question is whether such a sweeping truth was the right word for a suffering man. Older translations say "folly" where the ESV says "error." The writers quoted here follow that older wording.
Commentators agree that what Eliphaz heard was true. The problem lies elsewhere.
F. B. HoleFrom verse 12 onwards, we see more clearly where Eliphaz stands. He starts to tell a frightening experience of his own. He saw some kind of spirit, and he heard a warning about man's weakness and impurity before his Maker. What he heard is completely true. No mortal man can be more pure or just than God. In both he falls infinitely short of God's glory.
Writers read the second line differently. One takes it of the angels who fell:
James BoydPsalm 102 puts it beyond question that the elect angels obey the will of God in all they do. They have no will contrary to the will of God. I take it that the angels He charged with folly (Job 4:18) were fallen angels.
Another reads it more widely. Everything the creature has had to do with is defiled, though not guilty:
God does not lean on His servants. The reason lies in what a creature is: something that has to be held up.
James BoydNo creature can keep himself in blessing by his own obedience. God's power must keep every creature He sets in blessing with Himself. All who have stood on the ground of their own responsibility have fallen. There are fallen angels as well as fallen men, and there are elect angels as well as elect men. It is impossible to imagine a creature that supports itself.
The comparison begins in heaven and then drops to man. If heaven's own beings are unclean beside God, mortal man has far less to say for himself.
Samuel Ridout"Shall mortal man be more just than God?" — or "just before God," in His presence. Compared with His holiness, even the heavenly beings are unclean. The seraphim cover their faces as they proclaim Him. How much less can mortal man boast of himself, since his mortality is a witness of his sin. His breath is in his nostrils. His life is over in a day, like a story that is told — like the short-lived moth.
Here is the flaw. Eliphaz used a truth that levels everyone to single out one sufferer.
Samuel RidoutThis is all quite true, and in another setting it would be fitting. But, as already said, it misses the mark, because it does not meet Job's need. In God's sight all are indeed an unclean thing. Yet does that cancel the righteousness that really exists in the children of God? If all are unclean in God's sight, then Eliphaz must take his place beside Job. He is not at all ready to do that, and so his whole explanation of suffering fails.
The vision had a first hearer, and Eliphaz forgot who that was:
Leslie M. GrantHow true and applicable are such words to all of mankind, but Eliphaz was applying it only to Job, not to himself, because Eliphaz did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "broken in pieces." … But a vision or dream is intended to apply directly to the one who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. Similarly, we may hear good ministry which we think to be more applicable to others than to ourselves.
If God can charge even heaven's servants, then stability must come from above the creature.
The Christian's FriendFailure clung to everyone until the Son came. Angels served man, but even angels He could charge with "folly." (Job 4:18.) … But now the Son has come, and entry, stability, and rest for eternity are ours — I mean, they belong to all believers — in association with Christ in heavenly blessing. … He is greater than the angels, for He is the Son.
- Charge. The warning starts at the top. God places no trust even in His heavenly servants, so the standard is not human at all.
- Creature. Nothing created stands on its own. God's power holds up every being He keeps in blessing, angels included.
- Descent. The argument then drops from angels to man. If heaven's own beings are unclean beside God, mortal man has nothing to boast of.
- Misfire. The doctrine was true and the aim was wrong. It levels Eliphaz as surely as Job, and he would not stand beside him.
- Son. No servant and no angel could give stability. The Son can. He is greater than the angels, and in Him believers have entry, stability, and rest.
How much more them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foundation is in the dust, who are crushed as the moth!
Eliphaz has just described a night vision. The voice he heard drives one point home. If God finds fault even in His heavenly servants, what standing can a man have — a creature housed in mud, resting on dust, and snapped as easily as a moth? Commentators agree the words are true. What divides the chapter is whether they were true for Job.
The verse is not Eliphaz's own reasoning. He gives it as a message that reached him in the night:
William KellyNext Eliphaz gives, in a mysterious and dreadful style, a message of the night. It had pressed one thing on his own soul. Earthly, sinful, weak man is foolish to claim he is more just than God by putting God's dealings on trial.
The image comes from ordinary building work. It matters what the cheapest houses in that world were made of:
Morrish Bible DictionaryTemporary houses and those for the poor were often built of mud. A thief could dig straight through such a wall, and left alone these houses soon became a heap of rubbish.
That is the body a man lives in. One writer draws the same comparison while insisting man is still a marvel:
James McBroomWith all his marvellous ability, desires and far-reaching activity, he lives in a house of clay. He is a vessel made of dust, and it cannot rise above the earth it is part of. In his moral and spiritual nature he is fitted to rise up and answer the deepest thoughts of God. Yet his body ties him to the creation beneath him. Man is indeed a marvellous piece of divine workmanship.
The moth is short-lived, and the comparison is not flattering. Here man's death points to something deeper than weakness:
Samuel RidoutCompared with God's holiness, even the heavenly beings are unclean. The seraphim veil their faces as they proclaim Him. How much less can mortal man, whose mortality is a witness of his sin, boast of himself. His breath is in his nostrils. His life is over in a day, like a story that is told — like the short-lived moth.
Commentators do not dispute the doctrine. They dispute the use Eliphaz makes of it:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThis vision describes the greatness and majesty of God and of course is again true. That it was a real vision cannot be doubted. Man's smallness, his utter nothingness, is made known in this vision. But did this meet the need of suffering Job? It could not explain the reason for Job's suffering. And something like this is suggested by these words: Job, you are just like other men before God, and your present affliction shows it. You thought you were right with God, and that He blessed and protected you. But He is holy and just, so your suffering shows you are reaping the consequences of your sin, as others do.
The flaw: Eliphaz turns a truth about all men into a verdict on one man:
Samuel RidoutThis is all quite true, and in another setting it would fit well. But, as already said, it misses the mark. It does not meet Job's need. True, in God's sight all are an unclean thing. But does that cancel the truth that righteousness does exist in the children of God? If all are unclean in God's sight, then Eliphaz must take his place beside Job, a thing he is by no means ready to do.
Eliphaz never counted himself among the crushed. That mistake carries a lesson for anyone who listens to teaching:
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz was applying it only to Job, not to himself. He did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "broken in pieces." But a vision or dream is meant to apply directly to the person who has it. Eliphaz missed that one important fact. Similarly, we may hear good ministry which we think to be more applicable to others than to ourselves. Eliphaz could see that Job's excellence was going away. But his own excellence would go away too, as it does with all men.
Man's frailty is only one half of the account. The other half comes from God's side:
J. N. DarbyIt is a testimony to man's lowliness, if we look at man as he is in himself — "crushed," as Job says, "before the moth." But the moment I reach God's thoughts about man, I see God setting him over the works of His hand, and crowning him with glory and honour. That has put man into a wonderful place.
- Clay. The image is a mud hut on a dust footing — the kind of house that collapses into rubbish if left alone. That is the body every person lives in.
- Moth. Death is more than fragility. Man's mortality itself witnesses that he is a sinner before a holy God.
- True. Commentators do not question the vision's doctrine. Man's nothingness before God is real, and Eliphaz reported it faithfully.
- Misfired. Eliphaz aimed at Job a truth that covered himself as well. It explained nothing about Job's suffering, and it let Eliphaz stand outside a verdict he belonged in.
- Crowned. In himself, man is crushed like a moth. In God's thoughts, God sets him over the works of His hands and crowns him with glory and honour.