Now to me a word was secretly brought, and mine ear received a whisper thereof.
Eliphaz stops arguing from what he has seen in life and tells Job about a word that reached him at night. The question is simple: can a true word from God, half-heard and aimed at the wrong man, heal anyone?
The word came in secret, and to one man only.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz describes in the most vivid language a night vision he had experienced in quiet secrecy, one that had a deep effect on him. No doubt God intended by this to awaken the serious attention of Eliphaz, and He succeeded.
Job's day had no written Bible. God spoke to people one at a time, and He had a purpose in doing it.
Samuel RidoutIn the days of the patriarchs, we may say that God gave no revelation of Himself except to the individual. God made His mind known this way to Noah, to Abraham, and even to those who were largely ignorant of Him, such as Abimelech and Laban (Gen. 20:3, etc.; Gen. 31:24). A dream or vision was often used, but it was a divine revelation. Eliphaz refers to such a communication, in beautiful language, but not as definitely as Elihu does here (see Job 4:12-21). Elihu makes it plain that God speaks to man in this way. When all is silent, He speaks in a still, small voice and makes His mind known. His purpose is to correct wrong thoughts and actions, to draw man back from his own plans, and to hide pride from him.
A whisper in the dark is far less than what God has since shown us. And the fear it caused tells us about the man who heard it.
William KellyAnd now he brings in a vision of the night. He was very serious. And God has often used visions of the night. It is true we have something a great deal better. We have the vision of the day. We have the great vision of Christ shown in human flesh. We have the vision of God showing Himself. He speaks and acts for us in this world of sin and death... "Fear came upon me, and trembling" — clearly he did not have enough of grace; grace does not make people afraid in this way. It is judgment that does so, and this is what these good men are full of; they were full of the spirit of judgment.
What he heard was not comfort but rebuke.
William KellyNext Eliphaz sets out an oracle of the night, in a mysterious and awesome style. It impressed on his own soul the folly of one claim. Earthly, sinful, weak man claims to be more just than God by putting His dealings on trial.
True words can still miss their target — and turn back on the speaker.
Samuel RidoutThis is all quite true, and in other settings entirely fitting. But it falls beside the mark, because it does not meet Job's need. Truly, in God's sight all are as an unclean thing. But does that do away with the righteousness found in the children of God? If all are unclean in God's sight, then Eliphaz must take his place beside Job. He is by no means ready to do that. So every explanation of suffering fails.
He heard a word about all mankind and posted it to one address only — his friend's.
Leslie M. GrantHow true such words are, and how well they apply to all of mankind! But Eliphaz was applying them only to Job, not to himself. He did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "broken in pieces."... But a vision or dream is meant to apply directly to the one who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. In the same way, we may hear good ministry which we think fits others better than ourselves... If Eliphaz had learned the lesson God intended, he would not have spoken to Job the way he did.
This vision fits how Eliphaz argues in general.
C. H. MackintoshFrom these sentences it seems very clear that Eliphaz belonged to that class of people who argue mostly from their own experience. His motto was, "As I have seen." Now, what we have seen may be true enough, as far as we are concerned. But it is a total mistake to build a general rule on individual experience, and yet it is a mistake thousands make. What, for instance, had the experience of Eliphaz to do with Job?
- Whisper. Eliphaz caught only a fragment of a word in the night. The little he heard left him shaking.
- Fear. Grace does not frighten a man this way. His dread shows the spirit behind his advice: judgment.
- True. The message was sound: no one can put God's dealings on trial. God did speak by dreams before there was a written Bible.
- Misapplied. A vision is meant for the one who receives it. Eliphaz aimed it at Job and left himself out, so his words missed Job's need.
- Better. One man's experience cannot become everyone's rule. We have the vision of the day — Christ revealed — not a whisper in the dark.
In thoughts from visions of the night, when deep sleep falleth on men --
Eliphaz is answering Job, and he backs his case with something that came to him at night, while other people lay in deep sleep. Two questions follow. What kind of sleep was that? And does a night vision qualify a man to explain another man's pain?
The Hebrew word behind "deep sleep" here is tardemah. It is never used of an ordinary night's rest. It marks sleep that comes from outside the sleeper.
The Bible TreasuryA deep sleep — tardemah — is a term never used of natural sleep. It is used of sleep that is either supernatural, for a special purpose (Gen. 2:21; Gen. 15:12; Job 4:13; Job 33:15), or spiritual, part of God's governmental dealing with man. (Prov. 19:15; Isa. 29:10.)
In those early days God dealt with people one by one. A dream then was not just a dream.
Samuel RidoutIn the days of the patriarchs, we may say that God gave no revelation of Himself except to the individual. God made His mind known this way to Noah, to Abraham, and even to those who were largely ignorant of Him, like Abimelech and Laban (Gen. 20:3, etc.; Gen. 31:24). A dream or vision was often used, but it was a divine revelation. Eliphaz refers to such a communication, in beautiful language...
Something far better has come since. And the fear that came with the vision shows what filled Eliphaz.
William KellyGod has often used visions of the night. It is true we have something a great deal better. We have the vision of the day. We have the great vision of Christ shown in flesh. We have the vision of God showing Himself, and God speaking and acting for us in this world of sin and death... Fear and trembling came on him. Clearly he did not have enough grace. Grace does not make people afraid like this. It is judgment that does so, and this is what these good men are full of; they were full of the spirit of judgment.
The trouble with Eliphaz is not what he heard.
F. B. HoleFrom verse 12 onwards, the position Eliphaz takes becomes clearer. He starts to describe a terrifying experience of his own. He saw a spirit appear, and heard a word of warning about man's frailty and impurity before his Maker. What he heard is perfectly true. No mortal man can be more pure or just than God. In both he falls infinitely short of God's glory.
The problem is the use Eliphaz makes of it. A true statement can still be the wrong verdict on a man.
William KellyEvery word may be true in itself; He says it all with the utmost dignity and force. Yet he misapplies it, and it is one-sided, so as a whole it is wrong in effect. Eliphaz assumes that God is displaying His government right now. He assumes God measures out prosperity or trouble in exact proportion to what people deserve. This is false ground. It spoils the application, above all to someone like Job, whom Satan was allowed to attack.
A vision has a first audience: the person who receives it. Eliphaz forgot that, and aimed his at Job.
Leslie M. GrantBut a vision or dream is meant to apply directly to the one who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. In the same way, we may hear good teaching which we think fits others better than ourselves. Eliphaz could see that Job's excellence was going away. But the excellence of Eliphaz would go away too, as with all men... If Eliphaz had learned the lesson God intended, he would not have spoken to Job the way he did.
Behind everything Eliphaz says lies one habit of mind.
C. H. MackintoshThese sentences make it clear that Eliphaz belonged to the class of people who argue very much from their own experience. His motto was, "As I have seen." Now, what we have seen may be true enough, so far as we are concerned. But it is a total mistake to build a general rule on one person's experience. Yet thousands make that mistake.
- Sleep — The word for "deep sleep" is never used of ordinary rest. It marks sleep God sends for a purpose.
- Speech — In those days God spoke to people one at a time, by dream and vision. Eliphaz's night vision was one of these.
- Substance — What the voice said was true: no mortal is more just or pure than God.
- Slip — The message was for the man who received it, but Eliphaz aimed it at Job instead of himself.
- Standard — Eliphaz built his rule on "as I have seen," and it failed. We have something far better: the vision of the day, God showing Himself in Christ.
Fear came on me, and trembling, and made all my bones to shake;
Eliphaz is answering Job, and here he reaches for his strongest proof: something that happened to him at night. His shaking bones make the message that follows sound like a word from God — but does dread prove that God has spoken?
A whisper reaches Eliphaz in the deep sleep of night. Then comes terror, then a form he cannot make out.
Samuel RidoutNext, in words of great solemnity and lofty poetic beauty, Eliphaz describes his vision of the greatness and holiness of God. In the silent hours of the night, an apparition had come before him, making him tremble with a dread he could not name. While seeing nothing, he had felt the whisper of "a still small voice," and it made his hair stand up.
God spoke to people one by one in those days, often through a dream or vision. Eliphaz's night vision fits that pattern.
Samuel RidoutIn the days of the patriarchs, we may say that there was no revelation of God except what was given to the individual. God made His mind known this way to Noah, to Abraham, and even to those who were largely ignorant of Him, such as Abimelech and Laban. A dream or vision was often used, but it was a divine revelation. Eliphaz refers to such a communication, in beautiful language, but not as definitely as Elihu does here.
God had a purpose in the terror itself.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz describes in vivid language a night vision he had experienced in quiet secrecy, and it had a deep effect on him. He was evidently in a deep sleep when a fit of fear and trembling seized him (v.14). A spirit passed before his face, making his hair stand up. A form was present, but its appearance could not be made out. No doubt God intended by this to awaken the serious attention of Eliphaz, and He succeeded.
Commentators differ here. Where the ESV says "dread," older translations say "fear" — and one writer says that fear shows what Eliphaz lacked.
William KellyAnd God has often used visions of the night. It is true that we have something far better. We have the vision of the day. We have the great vision of Christ manifested in flesh. We have the vision of God showing Himself, and God speaking and acting for us in this world of sin and death... "dread came upon me, and trembling" — clearly he did not have enough of grace; grace does not make people fear in this way. It is judgment that does so, and that is what these good men were full of; they were full of the spirit of judgment.
What the voice actually said was true.
F. B. HoleFrom verse 12 onward, the position Eliphaz takes comes more clearly to light. He begins to tell of a rather terrifying experience of his own. He saw some spirit apparition, and received a word of warning about man's frailty and impurity in the presence of his Maker. What he heard is perfectly true. No mortal man can be more pure or more just than God. In both he falls infinitely short of God's glory.
The problem is the use he made of it. A true statement about human uncleanness cannot explain why Job is suffering. And if it could, it would catch Eliphaz too.
Samuel RidoutThis is all quite true, and in other connections most fitting; but, as already said, it misses the mark, because it does not meet Job's need. Truly, in God's sight, all are as an unclean thing. But does that set aside the fact that there is such a thing as righteousness in the children of God? If all are unclean in God's sight, then Eliphaz must take his place beside Job — something he is by no means ready to do — and every explanation of suffering fails.
This dread is not unique to Eliphaz. One writer hears it again in Jesus' disciples at sea.
The Bible TreasuryThey cried out in fear, for they thought they saw a ghost. The appearance of their Master filled them with more alarm than the fury of the storm seems to have done. That fear — the fear of the unknown — took hold of them, the fear Eliphaz spoke of when he said, "dread came upon me, and trembling, which made all my bones shake."
- Night. In that age God spoke through dreams and visions, and Eliphaz's experience follows that pattern.
- Dread. The shaking bones were God's way of waking Eliphaz up, and they worked.
- Judgment. Commentators differ on the fear. One calls it a mark of judgment, not grace, and says that spirit shapes all Eliphaz then says.
- Truth. The message he heard — that no mortal is more just or pure than his Maker — is true.
- Day. True words can still miss the mark. They did not meet Job's need, and they left Eliphaz no ground to stand above Job. What we have now is not a form in the dark but the vision of the day: Christ manifested in flesh.
And a spirit passed before my face -- the hair of my flesh stood up --
Eliphaz has just told Job that a message reached him in the night, and now he describes what came with it. Everything he says to Job afterwards rests on this moment, so two questions matter: what was it, and was he right to build on it?
The verse describes a sensation more than a sighting. He felt something before he saw anything. His body reacted before his mind could name it.
Samuel RidoutWith deep seriousness and great poetic beauty, Eliphaz describes his vision of the greatness and holiness of God. In the silent hours of the night, a ghostly figure came before him and made him tremble with a dread he could not name. Though he saw nothing, he felt the whisper of "a still small voice," that made his hair stand up.
The experience left a mark on him, and one writer reads a purpose behind it.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz uses vivid language to describe a night vision he had in private, and it affected him deeply. He was clearly in a deep sleep when a fit of fear and trembling shook him (v.14). A spirit passed before his face, causing his hair to stand up. A form was there, but he could not make out what it looked like. No doubt God meant this to get the serious attention of Eliphaz, and He succeeded.
The reaction was terror. That tells you something about the message Eliphaz was carrying to a suffering man.
William KellyGod has often used visions of the night. It is true we have something far better. We have the vision of the day. We have the great vision of Christ shown in human flesh. We have the vision of God showing Himself, and God speaking and acting for us in this world of sin and death... The fear and trembling that came over him show he did not have enough grace; grace does not make people afraid like this. It is judgment that does so, and this is what these good men are full of; they were full of the spirit of judgment.
This dread of the unknown was not unique to Eliphaz. It gripped the disciples too, at the very moment help arrived:
The Bible TreasuryThe appearance of their Master filled them with more alarm than the fury of the storm seems to have done. The same fear that Eliphaz described — the fear of the unknown — took hold of them.
Whatever the form was, no one can fault what it said.
F. B. HoleHe begins to tell of a terrifying experience of his own. He saw some kind of spirit, and he received a word of warning about man's weakness and impurity in the presence of his Maker. What he heard is perfectly true. No mortal man can be more pure or just than God. In both he falls infinitely short of God's glory.
The failure was in the delivery. Eliphaz took a private warning and aimed it at somebody else.
Leslie M. GrantSuch words are true, and they apply to all mankind. But Eliphaz applied them only to Job, not to himself... But a vision or dream is meant for the person who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. In the same way, we may hear good teaching and think it fits other people better than it fits us... If Eliphaz had learned the lesson God intended, he would not have spoken to Job the way he did.
Eliphaz builds his argument on what he saw that night. One writer names the habit behind that:
C. H. MackintoshThese sentences make it clear that Eliphaz belonged to the kind of people who argue mainly from their own experience. His motto was, "As I have seen." Now, what we have seen may be all true enough, so far as we are concerned. But it is a complete mistake to build a general rule on one person's experience, and thousands make that mistake. What, for instance, had the experience of Eliphaz to do with Job? It went for nothing in Job's case. As soon as Eliphaz stopped speaking, Job went on with the tale of his own sorrows, without paying the slightest attention to his words.
- Received. Something passed before Eliphaz in the dark. He felt it more than he saw it, and his hair stood on end at a form he could not make out.
- Real. The word that came with it was true — no mortal is more pure or more just than his Maker.
- Redirected. A dream is meant for the one who has it. Eliphaz aimed it at Job instead of himself, and that single move turned truth into cruelty.
- Rule. He rested his case on what he had seen himself. One man's experience cannot become the rule for another man's suffering.
- Replaced. Night visions have given way to something better: the vision of the day — God shown in Christ. What Eliphaz felt was dread, and dread is the mark of judgment, not of grace.
It stood still; I could not discern the appearance thereof a form was before mine eyes; I heard a slight murmur and a voice
Eliphaz has been telling Job about something that came to him in the night. Here he reaches the heart of it: a shape he could not name, a hush, then a voice — and the question of whose message it was, and who it was for.
One writer reads the scene as God gaining a man's full attention.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz describes in the most graphic language a night vision he had experienced in quiet secrecy, one that had a deep effect on him… A form was present, but he could not make out its appearance. No doubt God intended by this to awaken the serious attention of Eliphaz, and He succeeded.
The silence breaks into words, and the message speaks to man's standing before God.
William KellyNext Eliphaz sets out a message of the night, in mysterious and awe-filled style. It impressed on his own soul how foolish it is when man finds fault with God's dealings and so claims to be more just than God. Man is of the earth, sinful and weak.
One writer weighs the whole speech and finds the fault not in its words but in what Eliphaz assumes.
William KellyEvery word may be true in itself; it is all said with the greatest dignity and force. Yet he applies it wrongly, and he sees only one side. As a whole, then, it is wrong. Eliphaz assumes that God is displaying His government right now. He thinks God measures out prosperity or trouble to each person exactly as they deserve. This is false ground. It ruins the application, especially to someone like Job, whom God gave up to Satan's attacks and tried to the end.
In his later speeches Eliphaz keeps appealing to the same authority: what he himself has seen.
F. B. HoleIt is clear that his argument rests mainly for its force on his own powers of observation. He trusted those powers for his opinion about the meaning of the disasters that had fallen on Job.
One writer asks who the message was really for.
Leslie M. GrantHow true and how fitting such words are for all mankind! But Eliphaz was applying them only to Job, not to himself. He did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "broken in pieces." This had happened to Job, so Eliphaz took his vision as applying directly to Job. But a vision or dream is meant to apply directly to the one who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. In the same way, we may hear good ministry that we think fits others better than ourselves… If Eliphaz had learned the lesson God intended, he would not have spoken to Job the way he did.
Eliphaz's own reaction to the vision was fear. One writer takes that fear as a clue to his state, and points to a far clearer vision we have now.
William KellyAnd now he brings in a vision of the night. He was very serious. And God has often used visions of the night. It is true that we have something far better. We have the vision of the day. We have the great vision of Christ made known in flesh. We have the vision of God showing Himself, and God speaking and acting for us in this world of sin and death… "Fear came upon me, and trembling" — he clearly did not have enough grace. Grace does not make people afraid in this way. It is judgment that does so, and this is what these good men are full of; they were full of the spirit of judgment.
Commentators weigh the vision differently. One takes such night messages as real dealings of God with a person:
Samuel RidoutIn the days of the patriarchs, we may say there was no revelation of God except what was given to the individual… A dream or vision was often used, but it was a divine revelation. Eliphaz refers to such a communication, in beautiful language, though not as clearly as Elihu, a later speaker in this book, does here.
Another points out that not everything Eliphaz said carries the same weight:
Frederick W GrantYet Eliphaz for all that could say many a true thing — truth he had doubtless learned from God, and could speak as from Him; and one such saying the Holy Spirit certifies for us through the mouth of Paul. That could not certify the things the same Eliphaz said which were not right.
- Vision. A form stood before Eliphaz that he could not make out. God used the strangeness to seize his attention, not to satisfy his curiosity.
- Voice. After the silence came the message: no one can claim to be more just than God. Finding fault with His dealings is folly.
- Truth. Every word of it may be true on its own. The error lay underneath: Eliphaz assumed that present blessing and present trouble measure a person exactly.
- Target. A vision is meant first for the one who receives it. Eliphaz aimed it at the sufferer opposite him, and so learned nothing from it himself.
- Light. His night vision produced trembling, not grace. The fuller vision came later, in Christ made known in flesh.
Shall [mortal] man be more just than +God? Shall a man be purer than his Maker?
Eliphaz answers his suffering friend by telling him about a vision in the night. A voice asked him two questions, and both are true. But can a true statement about God still be the wrong word to a broken man?
Fear and trembling came with this vision. One writer reads that reaction as a clue to what filled Eliphaz.
William KellyHe refers to what he saw or heard then. "Now a thing was secretly brought to me, and my ear received a little of it. In thoughts from the visions of the night, when deep sleep falls on men. Fear came upon me, and trembling" — clearly he did not have enough of grace; grace does not make people afraid in this way. It is judgment that does so, and this is what these good men are full of; they were full of the spirit of judgment.
The question sets man beside God, not beside other men. Older translations read "more just than God." One writer shows how the word "mortal" carries part of the argument.
Samuel Ridout"Shall mortal man be more just than God?" — or "just before God," in His presence. Compared with His holiness, even the heavenly beings are unclean. The seraphim veil their faces as they proclaim Him. How much less can mortal man, whose mortality is a witness of his sin, boast. His breath is in his nostrils. His life is like a tale soon told, over in a day — like the short-lived moth.
Writers agree that what the voice said cannot be argued with, on either count.
F. B. HoleHe begins to tell of a terrifying experience of his own. He saw some ghostly figure, and heard a warning about man's frailty and impurity in the presence of his Maker. What Eliphaz heard is perfectly true. No mortal man can be more pure or just than God. In both he falls infinitely short of God's glory.
Eliphaz took the message as a description of Job. One writer turns it into a warning for anyone who hears teaching with someone else in mind.
Leslie M. GrantHow true and fitting such words are for all mankind, but Eliphaz was applying them only to Job, not to himself, because Eliphaz did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "broken in pieces." This had happened to Job, so Eliphaz took his vision as applying directly to Job. But a vision or dream is meant to apply directly to the one who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. In the same way, we may hear good ministry which we think fits others better than ourselves.
Because no wrong had been found in Job, the whole speech becomes an example of the judging we are told to avoid.
William KellyThat is the very thing we must not do. "Judge not, that you be not judged." When we find evil in someone who bears the Lord's name, we are bound to judge him; but no one found any evil in Job at all. And when we find no evil, we are bound not to judge; we are not to give way to our own thoughts; we are to wait on God to make it all plain… [The vision] is all very true, but it did not apply to the case at all.
The voice leaves the question hanging. Job asks it again later, and one writer shows where the answer comes.
An Outline of Sound WordsIn Job 9:2 Job asks, "How can a man be in the right before God?" The answer comes from the Lord Jesus. He spoke a parable "to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous." The proud Pharisee paraded his self-righteousness before God, and he stands condemned. The repentant tax collector "beat his breast, saying, God, be merciful to me, a sinner!" He "went down to his house justified, rather than the other" (Luke 18:9–14). The Lord answered Job's question by showing that the way to be just with God is by condemning ourselves before Him, confessing in true sorrow that we are sinners, and casting ourselves on His mercy. The full answer waited for the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus. In the letter to the Romans we learn that God justifies us by His grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, on the principle of faith.
- True. No mortal man is more just or more pure than his Maker; measured against God, man "falls infinitely short of God's glory."
- Mortal. The word carries the argument: a life as brief as a moth's is itself a witness of sin, so boasting before God is absurd.
- Yours. A vision in the night is meant first for the man who receives it. Eliphaz aimed it at Job and left himself out, as we do with good teaching.
- Judged. No one found evil in Job, so true words became a weapon. Where we find no evil, we are not to judge but to wait on God.
- Answered. The question hangs open here. The tax collector's cry for mercy begins the answer; Christ's death and resurrection complete it.
Lo, he trusteth not his servants, and his angels he chargeth with folly
Eliphaz has just told Job about a frightening experience of his own, and here he reports the warning he heard. The warning measures every creature against God, and it starts not with man but with God's servants in heaven. The question is whether such a sweeping truth was the right word for a suffering man. Older translations say "folly" where the ESV says "error." The writers quoted here follow that older wording.
Commentators agree that what Eliphaz heard was true. The problem lies elsewhere.
F. B. HoleFrom verse 12 onwards, we see more clearly where Eliphaz stands. He starts to tell a frightening experience of his own. He saw some kind of spirit, and he heard a warning about man's weakness and impurity before his Maker. What he heard is completely true. No mortal man can be more pure or just than God. In both he falls infinitely short of God's glory.
Writers read the second line differently. One takes it of the angels who fell:
James BoydPsalm 102 puts it beyond question that the elect angels obey the will of God in all they do. They have no will contrary to the will of God. I take it that the angels He charged with folly (Job 4:18) were fallen angels.
Another reads it more widely. Everything the creature has had to do with is defiled, though not guilty:
God does not lean on His servants. The reason lies in what a creature is: something that has to be held up.
James BoydNo creature can keep himself in blessing by his own obedience. God's power must keep every creature He sets in blessing with Himself. All who have stood on the ground of their own responsibility have fallen. There are fallen angels as well as fallen men, and there are elect angels as well as elect men. It is impossible to imagine a creature that supports itself.
The comparison begins in heaven and then drops to man. If heaven's own beings are unclean beside God, mortal man has far less to say for himself.
Samuel Ridout"Shall mortal man be more just than God?" — or "just before God," in His presence. Compared with His holiness, even the heavenly beings are unclean. The seraphim cover their faces as they proclaim Him. How much less can mortal man boast of himself, since his mortality is a witness of his sin. His breath is in his nostrils. His life is over in a day, like a story that is told — like the short-lived moth.
Here is the flaw. Eliphaz used a truth that levels everyone to single out one sufferer.
Samuel RidoutThis is all quite true, and in another setting it would be fitting. But, as already said, it misses the mark, because it does not meet Job's need. In God's sight all are indeed an unclean thing. Yet does that cancel the righteousness that really exists in the children of God? If all are unclean in God's sight, then Eliphaz must take his place beside Job. He is not at all ready to do that, and so his whole explanation of suffering fails.
The vision had a first hearer, and Eliphaz forgot who that was:
Leslie M. GrantHow true and applicable are such words to all of mankind, but Eliphaz was applying it only to Job, not to himself, because Eliphaz did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "broken in pieces." … But a vision or dream is intended to apply directly to the one who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. Similarly, we may hear good ministry which we think to be more applicable to others than to ourselves.
If God can charge even heaven's servants, then stability must come from above the creature.
The Christian's FriendFailure clung to everyone until the Son came. Angels served man, but even angels He could charge with "folly." (Job 4:18.) … But now the Son has come, and entry, stability, and rest for eternity are ours — I mean, they belong to all believers — in association with Christ in heavenly blessing. … He is greater than the angels, for He is the Son.
- Charge. The warning starts at the top. God places no trust even in His heavenly servants, so the standard is not human at all.
- Creature. Nothing created stands on its own. God's power holds up every being He keeps in blessing, angels included.
- Descent. The argument then drops from angels to man. If heaven's own beings are unclean beside God, mortal man has nothing to boast of.
- Misfire. The doctrine was true and the aim was wrong. It levels Eliphaz as surely as Job, and he would not stand beside him.
- Son. No servant and no angel could give stability. The Son can. He is greater than the angels, and in Him believers have entry, stability, and rest.
How much more them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foundation is in the dust, who are crushed as the moth!
Eliphaz has just described a night vision. The voice he heard drives one point home. If God finds fault even in His heavenly servants, what standing can a man have — a creature housed in mud, resting on dust, and snapped as easily as a moth? Commentators agree the words are true. What divides the chapter is whether they were true for Job.
The verse is not Eliphaz's own reasoning. He gives it as a message that reached him in the night:
William KellyNext Eliphaz gives, in a mysterious and dreadful style, a message of the night. It had pressed one thing on his own soul. Earthly, sinful, weak man is foolish to claim he is more just than God by putting God's dealings on trial.
The image comes from ordinary building work. It matters what the cheapest houses in that world were made of:
Morrish Bible DictionaryTemporary houses and those for the poor were often built of mud. A thief could dig straight through such a wall, and left alone these houses soon became a heap of rubbish.
That is the body a man lives in. One writer draws the same comparison while insisting man is still a marvel:
James McBroomWith all his marvellous ability, desires and far-reaching activity, he lives in a house of clay. He is a vessel made of dust, and it cannot rise above the earth it is part of. In his moral and spiritual nature he is fitted to rise up and answer the deepest thoughts of God. Yet his body ties him to the creation beneath him. Man is indeed a marvellous piece of divine workmanship.
The moth is short-lived, and the comparison is not flattering. Here man's death points to something deeper than weakness:
Samuel RidoutCompared with God's holiness, even the heavenly beings are unclean. The seraphim veil their faces as they proclaim Him. How much less can mortal man, whose mortality is a witness of his sin, boast of himself. His breath is in his nostrils. His life is over in a day, like a story that is told — like the short-lived moth.
Commentators do not dispute the doctrine. They dispute the use Eliphaz makes of it:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThis vision describes the greatness and majesty of God and of course is again true. That it was a real vision cannot be doubted. Man's smallness, his utter nothingness, is made known in this vision. But did this meet the need of suffering Job? It could not explain the reason for Job's suffering. And something like this is suggested by these words: Job, you are just like other men before God, and your present affliction shows it. You thought you were right with God, and that He blessed and protected you. But He is holy and just, so your suffering shows you are reaping the consequences of your sin, as others do.
The flaw: Eliphaz turns a truth about all men into a verdict on one man:
Samuel RidoutThis is all quite true, and in another setting it would fit well. But, as already said, it misses the mark. It does not meet Job's need. True, in God's sight all are an unclean thing. But does that cancel the truth that righteousness does exist in the children of God? If all are unclean in God's sight, then Eliphaz must take his place beside Job, a thing he is by no means ready to do.
Eliphaz never counted himself among the crushed. That mistake carries a lesson for anyone who listens to teaching:
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz was applying it only to Job, not to himself. He did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "broken in pieces." But a vision or dream is meant to apply directly to the person who has it. Eliphaz missed that one important fact. Similarly, we may hear good ministry which we think to be more applicable to others than to ourselves. Eliphaz could see that Job's excellence was going away. But his own excellence would go away too, as it does with all men.
Man's frailty is only one half of the account. The other half comes from God's side:
J. N. DarbyIt is a testimony to man's lowliness, if we look at man as he is in himself — "crushed," as Job says, "before the moth." But the moment I reach God's thoughts about man, I see God setting him over the works of His hand, and crowning him with glory and honour. That has put man into a wonderful place.
- Clay. The image is a mud hut on a dust footing — the kind of house that collapses into rubbish if left alone. That is the body every person lives in.
- Moth. Death is more than fragility. Man's mortality itself witnesses that he is a sinner before a holy God.
- True. Commentators do not question the vision's doctrine. Man's nothingness before God is real, and Eliphaz reported it faithfully.
- Misfired. Eliphaz aimed at Job a truth that covered himself as well. It explained nothing about Job's suffering, and it let Eliphaz stand outside a verdict he belonged in.
- Crowned. In himself, man is crushed like a moth. In God's thoughts, God sets him over the works of His hands and crowns him with glory and honour.
From morning to evening are they smitten without any heeding it, they perish for ever.
Eliphaz is passing on a voice he heard in a night vision. The voice puts every person in one picture: a life so frail it can break within a single day, and end with no one taking any notice. The words sound weighty and true. That raises the real question here. Does a true statement about mankind make the right word for a suffering man?
Why does the speech reach for a moth and a single day? One writer explains how it uses frailty as evidence about man himself. He quotes an older translation of the question asked a few verses earlier.
Samuel Ridout"Shall mortal man be more just than God?" — or "just before God," in His presence. Compared with His holiness, even the heavenly beings are unclean. The seraphim veil their faces as they proclaim Him. How much less can mortal man, whose mortality is a witness of his sin, boast of himself. His breath is in his nostrils; like a tale that is told, his life is measured in a day — like the short-lived moth.
The speech is not false. The fault lies in a hidden assumption: God settles accounts now, so a man's circumstances show what he deserves.
William KellyEvery word may be true in itself. He says it all with the greatest dignity and force. Yet he misapplies it and tells only one side, so in effect the whole is mistaken. Eliphaz assumes that God is displaying His government now, and measures prosperity or hardship to men exactly as they deserve. This is false ground, and it ruins the application. It fails most of all with a man like Job, whom God gave up to be attacked by Satan and tried right to the end — an end that was not bitter, but sweet.
True words are hard to dismiss. That is what makes them dangerous in the wrong hands.
William KellyAbstract truth is altogether useless for the saints of God. Things which are true, but misunderstood and misapplied, may do more harm than many a false thing. Misapplied truth gives an error the apparent authority of God. The error then carries all the more weight, because it comes as the truth. Say a foolish thing, or one clearly false, and people despise it. But no believer can shrug off the truth of God. So when someone misuses the truth of God — when he uses it to crush a man whom God cares about intensely at that moment — how foreign and offensive that is to His mind!
The words describe every mortal. Yet Eliphaz aimed them at the one man who looked the part, and never turned them on himself.
Leslie M. GrantHow true and fitting such words are for all of mankind! But Eliphaz applied them only to Job, not to himself. He did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "beaten to pieces." That had happened to Job, so Eliphaz took his vision as applying directly to Job. But a vision or dream is meant to apply directly to the one who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. In the same way, we may hear good ministry which we think fits others better than ourselves. Eliphaz could see that Job's excellence was going away. But his own excellence would go away too, as it does with all men.
Eliphaz's picture ends with people perishing unnoticed. God's own thought of man runs the other way.
J. N. DarbyGod made man in His own image. This is never said of angels… It is a testimony to man's lowliness, when you look at man as he is in himself — "crushed," as Job says, "before the moth." But the moment I turn to the thoughts of God about man, I see God setting him over the works of His hand, and crowning him with glory and honour. That has put man into a wonderful place.
- Frail — set beside God's holiness, a human life is measured in a day. It can break between morning and evening, like a short-lived moth.
- True — nothing Eliphaz says here is false in itself. His words are weighty, and they fit every mortal.
- Misapplied — Eliphaz assumes God pays out rewards and punishments in plain sight now. That assumption turns a true statement into a false charge.
- Dangerous — truth aimed at the wrong man does more harm than an obvious lie. It lends God's authority to the error, and no believer can shrug it off.
- Half — Eliphaz stops at what man is in himself. God's thoughts go further: He crowns man with glory and honour.
Is not their tent-cord torn away in them? they die, and without wisdom.
Eliphaz ends his night vision with a picture of a life falling apart. The tent-cord is pulled up, the man dies, and he dies without wisdom. On their own the words are true. The question commentators press is why Eliphaz aimed them at a suffering friend.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThis vision describes the greatness and majesty of God and of course is again true. No one can doubt it was a real vision. It makes known man's smallness, his utter nothingness. But did this meet the need of afflicted Job? It could not explain the reason for Job's suffering. These words suggest something like this — Job, you are just like other men before God. Your suffering now shows it. You thought you were right with God, and that He blessed and protected you. But He is holy and just. So your suffering shows you are reaping the consequences of your sin, as others do.
Older translations render this verse as the man's excellence going away. The words fit every human being, but Eliphaz read them as a description of the man in front of him.
Leslie M. GrantHow true these words are, and how well they fit all mankind! But Eliphaz applied them only to Job, not to himself. He did not consider himself "crushed before a moth" and "broken in pieces." That had happened to Job, so Eliphaz treated his vision as pointing straight at Job. But a vision or dream is meant to apply directly to the one who has it, and Eliphaz missed that one important fact. In the same way, we may hear good ministry that we think applies more to others than to ourselves. Eliphaz could see that Job's excellence was going away. But the excellence of Eliphaz would go away too, as with all men.
True words can still be the wrong words. And if Eliphaz meant them about everyone, they covered him too.
Samuel RidoutThis is all quite true, and in other settings it fits well. But, as already said, it misses the mark, because it does not meet Job's need. Truly, in the sight of God, all are as an unclean thing. But does that set aside the righteousness that really exists in the children of God? If all are unclean in the sight of God, then Eliphaz must take his place beside Job. He is not at all ready to do that. And every explanation of suffering fails.
Eliphaz judged Job by what he could see. One writer states the rule that covers a case like this.
William KellyAnd yet that is the very thing we are called not to do. "Judge not, that you be not judged." When evil shows up in someone who bears the name of the Lord, we must judge him. But there was no evil in Job at all. And where evil does not show up, we must not judge. We are not to give way to our own thoughts. We are to wait on God to make it all plain.
God later said Eliphaz had not spoken what was right. Yet the New Testament quotes his words as Scripture. One writer explains how both can be true.
William KellyOne thing here is too remarkable to pass by. The Spirit of God uses as Scripture the very words that Jehovah later treated as a false estimate — not only of Job, but of Himself... You only have to examine the words of Eliphaz to see that in themselves they contain nothing but truth. But weigh them as applied to Job, and they are wrong beyond excuse... The New Testament quotes the words of Eliphaz in both 1 Corinthians and Hebrews, and there the application is perfectly good. In the Old Testament story the application was wrong, and God reproved the speakers for it.
- True. The vision was real, and what it says about human frailty is true of everyone.
- Misaimed. Eliphaz turned a truth about all people into a verdict on one man. It still could not explain why Job suffered.
- Unapplied. A vision is meant first for the one who receives it; Eliphaz saw Job's excellence going, never his own.
- Useless. True words that miss the sufferer's need do no good. Taken honestly, they put Eliphaz beside Job, not above him.
- Instructive. Where we find no evil, we do not judge; we wait on God. The New Testament quotes these same words as Scripture, used the right way.