And Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said,
Job has poured out his grief in chapter 3, and now the silence breaks: Eliphaz the Temanite speaks first. What comfort does he bring, and why does a speech full of true sentences end up wrong?
This one line opens the long argument of the book. As it opens, one figure drops out of the story.
William KellyHere the great debate begins, built on Job's outburst. He was now completely overcome by the calamity God had allowed to fall on him. As a godly man, Job knew very well that God could have prevented it, unless He had a purpose in it. Of that purpose Job knew nothing. But it is worth noticing this before I say more: Satan completely disappears. He had been utterly defeated.
The friends sat with Job for a week without a word. What broke the silence was not a message from God but their own thoughts.
William KellyThey began to think — and thinking is a dangerous thing. In God's presence we judge self and hear Him. These thoughts of ours, how often they mislead us! What we need is to pray and listen, so that we may receive His word from God. Ah, that is another thing, and exactly what is needed! Their ear was not open... The three friends first kept this dead and distressing silence toward Job. He soon learned, in bitterness, what came out of that silence. Though he began, they followed; but it was their own thoughts and not the mind of God.
"Temanite" tells us where Eliphaz came from: Teman, a place known for its wise men. His name and his country both carry meaning.
Samuel RidoutThey came from districts noted for men of wisdom: "Is wisdom no more in Teman? Is counsel perished from the prudent? Is their wisdom vanished?" (Jer. 49:7)... Some have defined the name Eliphaz as "God is strength," and others as "God is fine gold." Both meanings point at least to the greatness and supremacy of God. His country, Teman, means "the south," the country lying under the sun, open to the light. But we have learned that while the south country is open to the light, it is apt to be dry and arid, as Arabia indeed was. It needs, as Achsah said, "springs of water." Light without life can never help.
The speech that follows this verse is not crude abuse. What Eliphaz says is true, yet something in it is missing.
Samuel RidoutWhat he says is perfectly true. Job had comforted others in times of distress, and he should have borne up under his own trials. And yet would we not expect some words of sympathy from a friend — a "brother born for adversity"? Would not grace always teach us to "weep with those who weep"? The blessed Man of Sorrows did not scold sufferers like this. Human sorrow moved Him to compassion, even to tears. It is this harshness which shows a wrong principle in Eliphaz, one that comes out more clearly as he goes on.
Commentators differ in tone here. One notes that Eliphaz at least begins gently before the argument hardens.
F. B. HoleThe silence of a week being broken, Eliphaz was moved to speak. His earliest words, at the beginning of Job 4, have a gentle and considerate spirit. He acknowledged that Job had been a helper and support to others.
Each of the three friends argues from a different base. Eliphaz builds on what he has seen.
Morrish Bible DictionaryEliphaz argued from personal experience. He said, "I have seen that those who plough iniquity and sow wickedness reap the same" (Job 4:8). Bildad is the voice of tradition and the authority of the past... Zophar showed law and religiousness.
The flaw is not that what he saw was false. It is that he made it a rule for everyone.
C. H. MackintoshHis motto was, "As I have seen." Now, what we have seen may be true enough, as far as we are concerned. But it is a total mistake to build a general rule on one person's experience. And thousands of people make that mistake. What, for instance, had the experience of Eliphaz to do with Job?
All three friends start from the same assumption.
That assumption led them to a verdict God Himself rejected.
Morrish Bible DictionaryHe and his companions did not understand God, nor His dealings in discipline with a righteous man... So they condemned Job as an evildoer. They took what God had brought on him as the proof. God's wrath was kindled against them, for they had not spoken correctly of Him.
- Silence — Seven wordless days ended here; what filled the gap was thinking, not listening to God.
- Source — Eliphaz spoke his own thoughts, not the mind of God, and that is where the failure began.
- Standard — His rule was "as I have seen." He made his own experience a law for another man's life.
- Sympathy — His words were true, but true words without compassion wound. Light without life can never help.
- Sentence — The friends read Job's suffering as proof of guilt. They condemned an innocent man, and God's anger fell on them, not on him.
If a word were essayed to thee, wouldest thou be grieved? But who can refrain from speaking?
Job's friends have sat with him in silence, and Eliphaz is the first of them to speak. He opens with a polite question rather than a charge — but polite words are not always the right words for a suffering man.
One writer describes what the friends' silence meant, and what it cost the eldest of them to speak at all:
William KellyHe knew perfectly well what their gloomy silence meant. There was no real sympathy in their hearts toward him. There they sat, thinking their dark thoughts about Job the whole time, yet afraid to let them out. But at last Eliphaz gathers courage. He is the eldest of them, and he shows far more calmness, dignity and self-restraint than the ones who follow. He ventures to speak in a kind of apologetic tone. He says, "If one ventures a word with you, will you be impatient? Yet who can keep from speaking?"
His opening is gentle, and his next words praise Job. But the kindness rests on a wrong reading of what was wrong with him.
Leslie M. GrantJob's three friends could only think of God's justice in relation to Job's sufferings. They had no idea of God's love. Eliphaz no doubt thought his remarkable knowledge and speaking ability would help Job. But his diagnosis of Job's ailment was completely wrong. He begins gently and kindly. Then he rightly reminds Job that he had instructed many and had strengthened weak hands. His words had supported those who stumbled, and he had strengthened the feeble knees.
What Eliphaz goes on to say is not false. That is what makes his speech so hard to answer.
William KellyThe apostle Paul quotes the words of Eliphaz in the New Testament. God Himself pronounces that what they said was not right; yet the Holy Spirit gives all by inspiration, and uses the words of one of them as Scripture. Look at the words of Eliphaz on their own, and they contain nothing but truth. But weigh them as applied to Job, and they are inexcusably wrong. How wise is the way of the Lord! In the Old Testament history the application was wrong, and God reproved the speakers for it. In the New Testament the application is as right as the words themselves; everything is in place.
Eliphaz was right to expect strength from a man who had strengthened others. Still, a friend at a sickbed owes more than accuracy.
Samuel RidoutWhat he says is perfectly true. Job had comforted others in times of distress, and he should have borne up under his trials. Yet would we not expect some words of sympathy from a friend — a "brother born for adversity"? Would not grace always teach us to "weep with those who weep"? The blessed Man of Sorrows did not scold sufferers like this. Human sorrow moved Him to compassion, even to tears. It is this harshness which shows a wrong principle in Eliphaz, one that comes out more clearly as he goes on.
Eliphaz had just praised Job for lifting people who were falling.
Leslie M. GrantInstead, Eliphaz effectively thrust a sword into Job's soul. He criticised Job for being depressed when trouble comes to him. Why did Eliphaz not do as he says Job had done in the past, strengthening the weak hands and upholding those who stumbled? It is easy for us to see what we think is wrong in another without providing for him what might be for his help.
Later in the book, Job answers all of this by naming what the friends had become — and by saying what he would have done in their place. Commentators note that his own reply exposes the gap between speech and comfort:
Leslie M. GrantInstead of comfort, they had given heartless accusations, which Job calls "words of wind." He says that if they were in his place, he could heap up words against them in similar cruel accusation, but he would not do so: he would use his words to strengthen and encourage them in order to give them some relief. He longed for this himself, but they had nothing for him.
- Permission — Eliphaz asks before he speaks, then admits he cannot stay silent. His tone is apologetic, and he is the calmest of the three friends.
- Diagnosis — his courtesy covers a wrong reading of the case. The friends saw only God's justice in Job's suffering, and nothing of His love.
- Application — his words are true in themselves, and the New Testament later quotes them. Aimed at Job, they were inexcusably wrong.
- Sympathy — true words without compassion turn harsh. Grace weeps with those who weep.
- Help — Eliphaz praised Job for strengthening weak hands, then failed to do it himself. Seeing a man's fault is easy; giving him help is the hard part.
Behold, thou hast instructed many, and thou hast strengthened the weak hands;
Eliphaz answers Job by looking back at the man Job used to be — a teacher of many, and a support to weak hands. Is that praise meant as comfort? Or is it the first move in a case against his friend?
Eliphaz is not flattering. His picture of Job's past is accurate. One commentator says that fact should have shaped how Eliphaz went on to speak.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz no doubt thought his remarkable knowledge and skill in speaking would help Job. But his diagnosis of Job's illness was completely wrong. He begins gently and kindly... Then he rightly reminds Job that he had instructed many. He had strengthened weak hands. His words had supported those who stumbled, and he had strengthened the feeble knees. Since this was true, should Eliphaz not have given proper weight to such fine character in Job, and shown some real appreciation of it?
The compliment is a run-up. Eliphaz recalls what Job gave others, then asks why Job cannot supply it to himself. One commentator names what is missing.
Samuel RidoutWhat he says is completely true. Job had comforted others in their distress, and he should have held up under his own trials. Yet would we not expect some words of sympathy from a friend — a "brother born for adversity"? Would not grace ever teach us to "weep with those who weep"? The blessed Man of Sorrows did not scold sufferers like this. Human sorrow moved Him with compassion, even to tears. This harshness shows a wrong principle in Eliphaz.
The irony turns back on the speaker. Eliphaz describes help he is not giving.
Leslie M. GrantWhy did Eliphaz not do as he says Job had done in the past, strengthening the weak hands and upholding those who stumbled? It is easy for us to discern what we think is wrong in another without providing for him what might be for his help.
Job had words that lifted falling people. Now those same words cannot lift him — and that experience, one writer says, is not unique to Job.
Numerical Bible NotesSimple, all this — to see and say it about someone else! With the chill and the shadow on us, is it always so easy?... It is the same for more than Job. At the critical moment, when the demand comes for us to show strength, there is nothing but weakness. The arguments we ourselves used with others still stand where they did, but they do not help. They have not been refuted, but they do not comfort us. We need more than argument: the living strength of the God of strength alone is enough in the day of personal need. And then, perhaps, we realise a terrible thing: how much of the energy that carried us along was not that strength at all.
On its own, the sentence sounds like a tribute. One commentator sees a darker source behind it.
C. StanleyAnd now Satan renews the attack through friend Eliphaz. He shoots poisoned arrows through his lips, in chapter 4:3-8. "You have instructed many." It is terrible when Satan can fix a poor believer's thoughts on himself. "What!" he says, "is this you? You, who profess so much — you who instruct others — you who are looked up to?"... It is the first hint that Job is a hypocrite. We shall find this wedge driven, blow after blow, as we go on in the book.
Job could not do for himself what he had done for others. One writer sets that failure beside a greater sufferer.
J. G. BellettThe furnace usually has to set saints right. It reduces or silences some impatience, selfishness or complaint... Job was overcome. Trouble touched him and he fainted, though he had often strengthened weak hands and held up falling people with his words. "The strongest are knocked off their feet," as an old writer says. Peter sleeps in the garden, and in the judgment hall tells lies and swears to them. But there has been One whom the furnace, heated seven times, proved to be precious beyond expression.
- Gave — Job's record was real: he taught many, steadied weak hands, and held up people who were falling.
- Got — Job did not receive what he gave. Eliphaz offers criticism where a friend owed sympathy, and never strengthens the hands he praises.
- Failed — the arguments that once helped others did not help Job. Only the living strength of God is enough in the hour of personal need.
- Turned — the compliment opens a case. behind it lies the first hint that Job is a hypocrite, a wedge driven harder as the book goes on.
- Contrast — Job fainted when trouble touched him. One alone went through the furnace and came out precious beyond words.
Thy words have upholden him that was stumbling, and thou hast braced up the bending knees
Job has just broken a week of silence with a lament so dark that his friends cannot sit still. Eliphaz answers first. He opens with no accusation at all, but with praise for the good Job once did for other broken people.
Eliphaz's first words sound like respect. One writer traces how quickly the tone changes once the courtesy is spent.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinChapter 4:1-5. Eliphaz is the most dogmatic of the three friends, and in his first address he makes much of the greatness and justice of God. He had come to comfort, but he could bring little comfort to the afflicted man. He begins very politely: "If one replied to you (to Job's lament), would you be grieved? But who can refrain from speaking?" But at once he stabs Job to the heart.
The praise here is not a gift. It sets up the reproach that follows.
William KellyEliphaz the Temanite appears to be the oldest and the more dignified of the three friends. He rebukes Job first of all for a lack of firmness in facing the deep distress that had come on his family and himself. He is not content with this. He also blames Job: the man who knew so well how to meet others in their sorrows failed when the trouble came on himself.
Nothing Eliphaz says here is false. The problem is what he leaves out.
Samuel RidoutIn his opening words, Eliphaz begins the criticism that runs through everything the friends say. What he says is completely true. Job had comforted others in times of distress, so he should have borne up under his own trials. And yet would we not expect some words of sympathy from a friend — a "brother born for adversity"? Would not grace always teach us to "weep with those who weep"? The blessed Man of Sorrows did not scold sufferers like this. Human sorrow moved Him with compassion, even to tears. It is this harshness that shows a wrong principle in Eliphaz, which comes out more clearly as he goes on.
Job's words had propped up people who were slipping. Now the same words fail to comfort the man who spoke them.
Numerical Bible NotesSimple, all this — to see and say it about someone else! With the chill and the shadow on us, is it always so easy? "You have instructed many … your words have upheld him who was stumbling, and you have made firm the feeble knees: but now it has come upon you, and you faint." (Job 4:3-5.) So it is indeed with more than Job. At the critical moment, when we are called on to show strength, there is nothing but weakness. The arguments we used with others stand where they did, but they are of no use. No one has disproved them, yet they do not comfort us. We need more than argument: only the living strength of the God of strength is enough in the day of personal need. And it is a terrible thing, perhaps, to realise then how much of the energy that has carried us along was not that strength.
A record of helping others can become a weapon against the helper. One writer reads this passage as an attack coming through a friend's mouth.
C StanleyAnd now Satan renews the attack through his friend Eliphaz. He shoots poisoned arrows through Eliphaz's lips, in chapter 4:3-8. "You have instructed many." It is terrible when Satan can fix a poor believer's thoughts on himself like this. "What!" he says, "is this you? You, who profess so much — you who instruct others — you who are looked up to? What dishonour you will bring on the name of Christ if all that you are comes out before the world. Your sin is dreadful, because of the very profession you make." … This is the thin end of Satan's great wedge. It is the first hint that Job is a hypocrite. We shall find this wedge driven, blow after blow, as we go on in the book.
Words that hold up a falling man must carry more than good advice.
W T TurpinThere must be school time in God's family, and everything must be fully tested and proved. If we are walking with God, are we not aware how little we are able to help one another? It is painful to see how well able we seem to be to find the weak points in one another. To tell a man he is at the bottom of a deep ditch is one thing; it is quite another to be able, through grace, to lift him out of it. We must know the hand and heart of God, and His sustaining power, for ourselves. Then we can meet others in their varied circumstances. Like a skilled doctor, we shall know what each medicine is worth and be ready to use it. The doctor must have gone to school to learn. In the same way, we must walk through this great hospital of suffering — this present world. We must taste the comfort of God ourselves before we can offer it to others.
- Strength given — Job's help was real. His words steadied people who were stumbling, and even his critic admits it.
- Strength tested — the arguments we once used on others still stand. Yet they give no comfort when the shadow falls on us.
- Strength misused — every word Eliphaz says is true. But truth without sympathy turns harsh. The Man of Sorrows wept with sufferers instead of lecturing them.
- Strength attacked — the enemy turns "you have instructed many" into self-accusation. It is the first wedge in the charge that Job is a hypocrite.
- Strength renewed — only the living strength of God is enough in the day of personal need. Only those who have tasted His comfort can pass it on.
But now it is come upon thee, and thou grievest; it toucheth thee, and thou art troubled.
Eliphaz speaks first, praising the Job everyone knew — the man whose words held up others who were falling. Then he turns that record into a question: why does the comforter collapse when the trouble is his own?
Eliphaz has his facts right. Job had strengthened weak hands. But a true statement can still be the wrong thing to say to a suffering man.
Samuel RidoutIn his opening words, Eliphaz begins the fault-finding that marks the friends' words all the way through. What he says is true. Job had comforted others in distress, and he should have borne up under his own trials. And yet, would we not expect some words of sympathy from a friend — a "brother born for adversity"? Would grace not always teach us to "weep with those who weep"? The blessed Man of Sorrows did not scold sufferers like this. Human sorrow moved Him with compassion, even to tears.
The irony goes deeper. Eliphaz describes the very help Job once gave others, and then withholds it.
Leslie M. GrantInstead, Eliphaz all but thrust a sword into Job's soul. He criticised him for being depressed when trouble came to him (v.5). Why did Eliphaz not do as he says Job had done in the past, strengthening the weak hands and upholding those who stumbled? It is easy for us to see what we think is wrong in another without giving him what might help him.
The verse is not only about Eliphaz. The counsel we gave others with ease may not hold us up when the blow lands on us.
Numerical Bible NotesSimple, all this — to see and say it about someone else! With the chill and the shadow on us, is it always so easy? So it is with more than Job. At the critical moment, when the hour calls for strength, we have nothing but weakness. The arguments we used with others still stand where they did, but they do not help. No one has refuted them, yet they bring us no comfort. We need more than argument: the living strength of the God of strength alone is enough in the day of personal need. And it is a terrible thing to realise then how much of the energy that has carried us along was not that.
Behind the praise lies a fixed rule. If suffering always punishes sin, Job's collapse must expose hidden sin in him.
Samuel RidoutIn the argument of the three friends there is one unified line of thought, resting on a shared principle. That principle is this: all suffering is punishment, not instruction. It rests on God's justice rather than on His love — though the two are always joined in all His ways. Such a principle must fail to tell the sufferings of the righteous from those of the wicked. The friends carried it to its logical end. So Job's sufferings had to be for sin not yet found out, and his only hope of relief was to confess that sin and be shown mercy.
The friends said many true things. The harm lay in where they aimed them.
William KellyAbstract truth is completely useless to the saints of God. Truth that is misunderstood and misapplied may do more harm than many a false thing. Misapplied truth lends the apparent authority of God to an error, and it carries all the more weight because it comes as the truth. If someone says a foolish or clearly false thing, people dismiss it; but no believer can brush aside the truth of God. So when people use the truth of God wrongly, to crush someone who at that moment is an object of intense interest to God — how foreign and offensive that is to His mind!
One writer traces the strategy behind the words. Eliphaz uses Job's own reputation to turn Job's thoughts back on himself.
C StanleyAnd now Satan renews the attack through his friend Eliphaz. Poisoned arrows are shot through his lips, in chapter 4:3-8. "You have instructed many." It is terrible when Satan can fix a poor believer's thoughts on himself like this. "What!" he says, "is this you? You, who profess so much — you who instruct others — you who are looked up to?" ... This is the thin end of Satan's great wedge. It is the first hint that Job is a hypocrite. We shall find this wedge driven, blow after blow, as we go on in the book.
- Touched. The trouble Job once helped others through has now reached him. The man who steadied the falling is himself dismayed.
- Tested. Job's pain does not refute the arguments he once used. They just fail to comfort him. Argument was never the strength that carried him.
- Twisted. Eliphaz's facts are true. But his rule — suffering means punishment — cannot tell a righteous sufferer from a wicked one.
- Turned into a weapon. Truth aimed wrongly does more harm than open error. It lends God's authority to a wrong conclusion.
- Turned inward. The reproach makes Job look at Job; real help would have pointed him instead to the living strength of God.