The wing of the ostrich beats joyously -- But is it the stork's pinion and plumage?
Job has demanded a hearing with God; God answers by taking him on a tour of creatures he never made and cannot manage. The ostrich is one of the strangest exhibits: a bird with wings that cannot fly, and a mother who leaves her eggs in the dust.
Older English Bibles put a peacock in this verse. Commentators agree this is a mistake. The reason is as much history as language.
William KellyThe Authorised Version is far from a correct representation. The peacock seems to have been first known, even to Israel, in the days of Solomon, and the name is an Indian word turned into Hebrew. It is the ostrich which is really in the first clause, contrasted with the stork in the second. "The wing of the ostrich flaps joyously: but has she the stork's pinion and plumage?" ... Certainly the peacock is not meant here. The peacock is more striking for its splendid tail when spread out, and that does not enter into the description given. The ostrich, unlike the stork, has no power of flight. It runs at the greatest speed, and it has none of that parental fondness which marks the stork.
Two Hebrew words lie behind the verse. One of them names a cry.
Morrish Bible Dictionarynotsah means "plumage," and it is translated ostrich in Job 39:13-18. Job 39:13, however, refers to the ostrich by the plural word renanim, which means "a crying or wailing." The Authorised Version translates that word "peacocks."
The ESV above ends with "the pinions and plumage of love." The writers quoted here read that clause as naming the stork. The verse then turns on a comparison: one bird flaps in excitement, the other is known for what the first one lacks.
William KellyThere is a contrast here between the ostrich and the stork. The ostrich makes a great fluttering, and it is also stupidly indifferent to its young. The stork is the most affectionate bird that God created. No other bird has such great care for its offspring.
Her wings never lift her off the ground. The passage goes on to show what she does with her eggs.
Leslie M. GrantThe ostrich is another most interesting creature of God. It is a bird, but not a flying bird. It uses its wings only to help it run at a fast rate. Also, unlike other birds, she makes no comfortable nest to lay her eggs in and hide them from predators. She leaves them in the ground and warms them in the dust, in places where beasts or men may walk. She does not consider that these eggs can easily be broken.
The passage does not blame the bird. It traces her behaviour back to God, who takes the sense away.
William KellyGod gives one bird its remarkable character of affection. From another bird He takes away even the most basic sense — a bird of immense power and great speed, so fast that an ostrich could outrun a racehorse for a while.
The strange bird carries a lesson for Job himself.
Leslie M. GrantJob was to learn from the ostrich that God does not do what man might naturally expect, nor does God need to give us His reasons.
The neglect leaves a question hanging. The eggs lie in the open, yet the young birds still live.
Samuel RidoutHere is a creature that God Himself has apparently deprived of the ordinary instincts of a mother. Yet Someone — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.
Job's complaint was never about ostriches. It was about how God was handling him. The bird is an argument from the smaller case to the greater.
William KellyHe dwells on two things in particular — His supremacy, and also His power, joined with the most tender care... In fact, Job was laid low on every point. A sense of his own ignorance overwhelmed him in every possible way. He had been presumptuous in talking about the far more wonderful ways of a God who deals with a man's heart, soul and circumstances now... It was God showing His majesty, power, wisdom and goodness in outward things. If that were true of God, how much more in spiritual things?
- Bird — the creature is the ostrich, not the peacock. The peacock reached Israel only in Solomon's day, and its name came from India.
- Contrast — the verse sets the flapping ostrich against the stork, the most affectionate of birds. She has none of the stork's pinion and plumage.
- Withheld — she leaves her eggs in the dust, where a passing foot could break them. God took even basic sense away from her.
- Sovereign — the same God who gives one bird deep affection withholds sense from another, and gives her speed that outruns a racehorse. He owes us no reasons.
- Kept — the brood survives anyway, cared for by Someone Job never thanked. If God's hand is that steady over birds, Job's own case is safe in it.
For she leaveth her eggs to the earth, and warmeth them in the dust,
The ostrich is one exhibit in a long parade of creatures God sets before Job, a suffering man who wanted answers. She buries her eggs in the dust and walks away. Why would the Creator make a mother like that?
One commentator describes a bird that does the opposite of what nesting birds do:
Leslie M. GrantThe ostrich is another most interesting creature of God — a bird, but not a flying bird, using its wings only to help it run at a fast rate. Also, unlike other birds, she makes no comfortable nest to lay her eggs in and hide them from predators. She leaves them in the ground and warms them in the dust, in places where animals or people may walk. She does not consider the danger: these eggs break easily.
The verse begins with "For," tying it to the wing mentioned just before. Translations of that earlier line differ, and commentators read it as a contrast between two birds:
William KellyThere is nothing here about peacocks at all. It is a mistake. It should read, "The wing of the ostrich waves joyously; is it the pinion and plumage of the stork?" The first part of the verse is about the ostrich, and the second part about the stork. The ostrich, with its great fluttering and its stupid indifference to its young, stands in contrast to the stork. The stork is the most affectionate bird that God created. No bird has such great care for its offspring.
The same writer says where that difference comes from:
William KellyAnd who is to dispute with God? The God who gives one bird its remarkable character of affection takes the commonest sense away from another bird of immense power and great swiftness. An ostrich could outrun a racehorse for a while.
Critics have long said the description is inaccurate. Commentators differ on how much of the bird's behaviour is real neglect and how much observers misread. One note explains the bird's name and records what watchers have found:
Morrish Bible DictionaryIn the previous verse the ostrich is named by a word that means "a crying or wailing." The ostrich leaves its eggs in the sand, well covered up. The sun keeps them warm by day, and the parent sits upon them at night. The bird leaves other eggs unprotected nearby, to feed the young birds when they hatch, and these may be trampled on. As for the parents' indifference to their young, people say that when a hunter comes near, the birds leave their nests and often cannot find the place again in the wide desert. But dead jackals have been found near the nests, killed by the parent birds.
Another writer answers the critics by asking who is speaking here:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinIt would be amusing, if it were not so sad, when critics declare that the author of "the poem" made a mistake about the eggs of the ostrich. But it is not an "author" who speaks. It is the Creator Himself, and He knows more about His creatures than all the "scientists" in the world.
The eggs left in the dust are not left unwatched. One commentator puts the point as a question:
Samuel RidoutAll things, however wild and seemingly senseless, are His creatures, and He does not forget them. Here is a creature that God Himself seems to have deprived of the ordinary mother's instincts. Yet some One — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.
Job had been arguing with God's handling of his life. The ostrich is a creature man cannot account for. One writer draws the response that fits:
William KellyAs to the ostrich, let its wing speed ever so joyously, God is still sovereign here, whatever man may reason… But this is not without God, who takes in more than man can grasp. Let man then mark, learn, and worship, and not set up to judge God or to murmur.
The whole tour of wild creatures is building to one point about Job himself:
Samuel RidoutIt is significant that the series opens and closes with mention of beasts and birds of prey. They might seem worthless, or even harmful, and yet He cares for them with unerring wisdom. Shall He fail to watch over His child who knows and trusts Him?
- Contrast. The stork guards its young. The ostrich leaves hers in the dust. The difference is God's doing, not the birds'.
- Sovereignty. God gave one bird tender care. He withheld ordinary sense from another. He gives no reasons.
- Care. The eggs lie unguarded, yet they hatch. Someone is watching over a brood their own mother forgot.
- Worship. The honest response to a creature you cannot explain is to mark, learn, and worship, not to argue with the One who made it.
- Comfort. If God cares even for creatures that look worthless, the child who trusts Him will not be the one He overlooks.
And forgetteth that the foot may crush them, or that the beast of the field may trample them.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
She is hardened against her young ones, as though they were not hers; her labour is in vain, without her concern.
God answers Job by pointing him to the ostrich. She leaves her eggs in the sand and treats her chicks as if they were not hers — and the verse asks what such a bird says about the God who made her.
The ostrich breaks the pattern we see in almost every other mother. One commentator ties her harshness and its cause into a single lesson for Job:
Leslie M. GrantShe also treats her young harshly, as though they were not hers (v.16). How unlike most mother birds or animals! Why is this so? "Because God deprived her of wisdom, and did not endow her with understanding" (v.17). Sad to say, some human mothers act like the ostrich in this matter, but it is abnormal. But Job was to learn from the ostrich that God does not do what man might naturally expect. He does not need to give us His reasons.
God does not show Job the ostrich on her own. He sets her beside a bird that loves its young:
William KellyThe ostrich, on the contrary, leaves its young to get through as best they can. She leaves her eggs out in the sand, to come to maturity there or to be destroyed. She does not care about them... And who is to dispute with God? God gives one bird its remarkable character of affection. From another bird He takes away the commonest sense — a bird of immense power and great swiftness, able to outrun a racehorse for a while.
Two birds, one Maker, opposite natures.
Readers differ over what this verse describes. Reports about the bird itself add to the puzzle:
Morrish Bible DictionaryThe passage speaks of the ostrich leaving her eggs unprotected and hardening herself against her young. The ostrich leaves its eggs in the sand, well covered up. The sun keeps them warm by day, and the parent sits on them at night. She leaves other eggs unprotected nearby as food for the chicks when they hatch, and these may get trampled. As to the indifference of the parents to their young, reports say that when a hunter approaches, they leave their nests. Often they cannot find the place again in the wide desert. Yet people have found dead jackals near the nests, killed by the parent birds. Some suppose that Job 39:16 refers to other birds laying eggs in the ostrich's nest, so that the chicks which hatch are "not hers."
The mother does not care for her chicks. Yet they live, and that raises a question:
Samuel RidoutAll things, however wild and senseless they seem, are His creatures, and He does not forget them... Here is a creature God Himself seems to have deprived of the ordinary mother's instincts. Yet some One — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.
Scripture later uses this bird as the lowest measure of human cruelty. When Jerusalem fell, the prophet compared its mothers to her:
William KellyNo wonder the Chaldean enemy was bitter in reproach and cruel in punishment. But, sad to say, the chosen nation's cup of indignity was not full until they themselves turned the most bitter of all against their own kin, out of sheer want and misery. "Even jackals offer the breast; they nurse their young; but the daughter of my people has become cruel, like the ostriches in the wilderness."
God never explains the ostrich to Job. One writer names the response that fits:
William KellyBut this is not without God. He takes in more than man can grasp, and it pleases Him, of His own will and wisdom, to deprive the ostrich of wisdom. Yet He has also given her a swiftness that mocks the swiftest horse with its rider. Let man then mark, learn, and worship, and not set himself up to judge God or to murmur. That would be folly more guilty than the desert racer's, as well as irreverence and rebellion.
- Made so. Her hardness toward her young is no accident. God withheld wisdom from her by His own choice.
- Not explained. God tells Job what He did, never why. He "does not do what man might naturally expect," and owes us no reasons.
- Not uniform. The same Maker gave one bird remarkable affection and gave this one none. He gave her speed instead, enough to outrun a racehorse.
- Not forgotten. Though the mother fails, the brood survives; someone still feeds what no parent guards.
- Not ours to judge. The right answer to a creature we cannot explain is worship, not complaint.
For +God hath deprived her of wisdom, and hath not furnished her with understanding.
God questions Job about the ostrich for six verses, and this line explains why she acts as she does. Why would God leave one of His own creatures without wisdom, and what was a suffering man meant to learn from it?
Older English Bibles read "peacocks" in verse 13. The Hebrew points to the ostrich instead, and sets her beside the stork:
Morrish Bible DictionaryThe word notsah means "plumage," and it is translated ostrich in Job 39:13-18. But Job 39:13 calls the ostrich renanim, a plural word meaning "a crying or wailing." The King James Version translates it "peacocks." The passage is obscure. Job 39:13 may be better translated: "The wing of the ostrich beats joyously: but is it the stork's pinion and plumage?" The passage then speaks of the ostrich leaving its eggs unprotected, and being hard toward its young.
Why does she act this way? The verse gives the reason, and the wording varies between translations: some say God "deprived her of wisdom," the ESV says He "made her forget wisdom."
Leslie M. GrantAlso, she treats her young harshly, as though they were not hers (v.16). How unlike most mother birds or animals! Why is this so? "Because God deprived her of wisdom, and did not endow her with understanding" (v.17). Sad to say, some human mothers act like the ostrich in this matter, but it is abnormal. But Job was to learn from the ostrich that God does not do what man might naturally expect. Nor does God need to give us His reasons.
Two birds stand side by side in the chapter. One was given a mother's affection; the ostrich was not. The same hand made both:
William KellyAnd who is to dispute with God? The God that gives one bird its remarkable character of affection takes away the commonest sense even from another bird of immense power and great swiftness, so that an ostrich could outrun a racehorse for a while — "she scorns the horse and his rider."
So what is a man supposed to do with a God who works like this?
William KellyBut this is not without God, who takes in more than man can grasp. So let man take note, learn, and worship. Let him not set himself up to judge God or to grumble. That would be folly more guilty than the desert racer's own, and irreverence and rebellion besides.
The ostrich is not the only wild creature in the chapter. Set her among the rest, and what she lacks points to Someone who does not lack it:
Samuel RidoutAll things, however wild and seemingly senseless, are His creatures, and He has not forgotten them. Here is another one: the ostrich of the desert. Her wings vibrate as she races with the speed of the wind… Here is a creature whom God Himself seems to have deprived of the ordinary motherly instincts. Yet Someone — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.
If the helpless brood is still cared for, then care does not depend on the carer we can see. Job's case looked the same: left alone to all appearances, yet never outside God's keeping.
All these questions about creatures had one target — Job himself:
William KellyWho is it? — was it you, Job, that managed all these things? Was it you that cared for them all, provided for them all? Were you born when they began? In fact, Job was laid low on every point. The sense of his own ignorance and presumption overwhelmed him in every possible way. He had been talking about the far more wonderful ways of a God who deals with a man's heart, a man's soul, a man's circumstances now… It was God showing His majesty, power, wisdom and goodness in outward things. If that were true of God, how much more in spiritual things?
- Withheld. The ostrich neglects her eggs and is hard toward her young. God kept wisdom and understanding from her. The verse names this as His act, not an accident of nature.
- Balanced. What He withholds in one place He supplies in another: the same bird that lacks common sense can outrun a horse.
- Compared. One bird gets a mother's affection; the ostrich gets none. God makes one creature unlike another, and no one may dispute it.
- Covered. Even the brood left in the dust survives — proof that God's care does not depend on the carer we can see.
- Silenced. Job had to draw the line upward. If God's wisdom and goodness reach a desert bird, they reach a man's heart and circumstances too. What God asks for is worship, not complaint.
What time she lasheth herself on high, she scorneth the horse and his rider.
This verse ends God's picture of the ostrich — a bird with no ordinary sense, yet fast enough to outrun the best horse. Job had demanded answers from God, and God points him instead to a creature no man would have designed.
These verses are hard to translate. A reference work explains what the last line records:
Morrish Bible DictionaryThe passage is obscure... Job 39:18 refers to the speed of the bird, which has often exceeded that of the best horses.
One writer describes the bird behind that speed:
Leslie M. GrantThe ostrich is another most interesting creature of God. It is a bird, but not a flying bird. It uses its wings only to help it run fast.
God has just said He took wisdom from her. Now He shows what He gave her instead. Where the ESV says she "laughs at" the horse, the older wording quoted below is "scorns."
William KellyThe ostrich, by contrast, leaves its young to get through as best they can. It leaves its eggs exposed in the sand, to grow or to be destroyed. She does not care about them... "because God has deprived her of wisdom." And who is to dispute with God? The God who gives one bird its remarkable affection takes the commonest sense away from another bird of immense power and great speed. So an ostrich could outrun a racehorse for a while — "she scorns the horse and his rider."
Job wanted God to explain Himself. Here he gets a fact instead of a reason.
Leslie M. GrantBut Job was to learn from the ostrich that God does not do what man expects. God does not need to give us His reasons. The speed of the ostrich also is amazing, far exceeding the speed of a horse (v.18). Why? Because God chose to make it this way.
She leaves her eggs in the dust and treats her young as strangers.
Samuel RidoutHere is a creature that God Himself seems to have deprived of the ordinary instincts of a mother. Yet some One — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.
The same question runs through God's whole tour of the animals here.
Samuel RidoutDoes he see that prowling lioness? Who gives it food for its young? Who listens to the hungry croak of the raven? Who preserves the brilliant but stupid ostrich, the prancing battle-horse? Who guides the eagle, the king of birds, with its home high above? There is but one answer.
The right response is not to analyse God but to worship Him.
William KellyBut this is not without God. He takes in more than man can grasp. Of His own will and wisdom, He is pleased to deprive the ostrich of wisdom. Yet He has also given her a swiftness which mocks the swiftest horse with its rider. Let man then mark, learn, and worship, and not set up to judge God or to murmur. This would be folly more guilty than that of the racer of the desert, as well as irreverence and rebellion.
Speed is also the hinge to the next creature in the chapter.
Samuel RidoutThe swiftness of the ostrich leads naturally to the next creature. Jehovah passes to the horse — swiftness, strength and grace in one body — and above all to the war-horse... What part has Job had in designing and creating so remarkable a creature?
And the whole argument was never about birds.
William KellyIt was God showing His majesty, power, wisdom and goodness in outward things. If that were true of God, how much more in spiritual things? And this is the great lesson of the Book that Job had to apply.
- Withheld. God took wisdom from one bird, while giving another bird its remarkable affection.
- Given. In its place He put a speed that leaves the best horse and its rider behind, because He chose to make her that way.
- Unexplained. Job learns that God does not act as man expects and owes no reasons for how He shares out His gifts.
- Sustained. Even the brood left in the dust survives, because one Hand cares for what the parent neglects.
- Answered. God shows this power and care in outward things. Job can trust the same hands with his own soul, and worship instead of argue.