And Jehovah answered Job out of the whirlwind and said,
Job and his friends have argued for chapter after chapter, and Elihu has spoken last. Now God answers for Himself. Why does He speak out of a storm? And why does the man who begged for this meeting end up wishing he had stayed silent?
Job had cried out for a hearing with God. One writer notes how that cry was answered: by word, not by sight, and only once Elihu had finished.
One more thing crowns Elihu's work: the incomparable favour Job had also, in a frantic way, begged for. He asked that a man rather than God might meet him; but he asked that he might find God too. And so he does. God appears. Jehovah Himself gives His answer from the whirlwind... this is the special value at the close of the book of Job: God does not wait until the day of judgment to decide where there is faith to look for Him. Only now it is His word, and in no way an appearance of God in visible form. Jehovah meets him here, when Elihu's word had done its work.
The Hebrew name behind "the LORD" has been almost absent since chapter 2. Here it returns, and with it a rebuke that is better than God's silence.
Here, then, we have Jehovah — notice that this name has not appeared after Job 2 (except in Job 12:9) in the historical part... He speaks according to His authority and His relationship. That is exactly what "Jehovah" means. It is God not merely in the abstract, but God in relation to man upon the earth. And so He answers Job. But He answers him here because it was a rebuke out of the whirlwind... And it is a terrible thing when God does not rebuke a soul upon the earth. What does it mean? It means judgment by and by for ever. Everyone God brings into living relationship with Himself has His interference.
The storm is not just scenery. God speaks from the very thing that pictured Job's confusion.
The whirlwind had continued a long time, and is still blowing when the Lord speaks in these verses. The whirlwind itself was meant to impress on Job that all his swirling troubles and confusion stood under the Creator's controlling hand. "The LORD has His way in the whirlwind and in the storm, and the clouds are the dust of His feet" (Nahum 1:3).
Another writer notes what the roar of that wind really was, and who it was for.
Wind is not visible; yet when it blows hard, men feel its pressure and hear its roar. As the whirlwind came near, its roar was the voice of Jehovah Himself. He spoke to Job alone.
God's opening question is aimed at Job, not at Elihu. It exposes what all his words had achieved.
Out of that whirlwind Jehovah replies to Job's empty questions and laments — not to Elihu, who had been God's spokesman leading up to this. So it was not Elihu who darkened counsel. "My desire is that the Almighty would answer me," was Job's closing word (Job 31:35). He is now to have his wish granted; but how different the effect! "As a prince would I go near to Him" (v. 37), he had declared. "I am vile" is what he has to say when he hears His voice. Jehovah asks, "Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" To darken counsel is to hide the purposes of God and the truth. Job had poured out a flood of words — laments, protests, accusations. Much was true and excellent. But as far as God's purposes went, it was all spoiled by one thing: he exalted his own righteousness at the expense of Jehovah's.
What follows this verse is striking for what it leaves out.
The other very striking thing comes at the end. All the cloud of words had died away, and Jehovah answers Job out of the whirlwind. What will He say?... He didn't do it! Not one word of explanation of Himself did God utter. Not one word to answer the questions that Job had asked. His words were entirely concerned with the things of this earth and nature.
Where all the arguing had failed, God's presence succeeded.
These moments in the presence of God produced a result that all the talk of the three friends, and even of Elihu, had not achieved. Here was a man who stood out among men, with a good word from God Himself. Now he had discovered his own utter sinfulness in the deepest springs of his being. A discovery we all in our turn have to make!
- Asked — Job begged for a hearing with God, and he got it: by God's word, not by a vision.
- Answered — God speaks out of the whirlwind. The swirling trouble that had spun Job's life around was always under the Creator's hand.
- Named — the name "Jehovah" returns after chapter 2. It means God in relationship, so even His rebuke proves that relationship is alive.
- Silent — He explains nothing about Job's suffering. He speaks only of earth, sky and creatures.
- Seen — that presence did what three friends and Elihu could not. Job saw his own sinfulness and called himself vile.
Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
After chapters of argument, and then Elihu's speech, God answers Job out of the storm — and His first word is a question, not comfort. Who is He rebuking, what does it mean to "darken counsel," and why does He open with a challenge instead of an answer?
Job had begged for a hearing from God. He gets it — but not the effect he expected. God's question exposes who is speaking.
"My desire is that the Almighty would answer me," was Job's closing word (Job 31:35). He is now to have his wish granted; but how different the effect! "As a prince would I go near to Him" (v. 37), he had declared. "I am vile" is what he has to say when he hears His voice. Jehovah asks, "Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" To darken counsel is to hide the purposes of God and the truth. Job had poured out a flood of words — laments, protests, accusations. Much of it was true and excellent. But as far as God's purposes went, he spoiled it all by exalting his own righteousness at the expense of Jehovah's. Instead of light, the clear flame of divine truth, it was all a smoke-cloud of unbelief that blotted out the sun in the sky. Who is this? Is it some divine being, Jehovah's equal, calling the other's acts into question? Was it some mighty angel, gifted with heavenly wisdom, that dared lay a charge against his Maker? No, it was a man, frail, ignorant, sinful.
Some read this opening line as a rebuke of Elihu, the young man who spoke last. The words themselves point elsewhere.
It should be very clear to everyone that God is not speaking to Elihu. He confirms what Elihu had said, and He answers Job directly (v. 1). Most of what God says is in the form of questions. His first question is, "Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" (v. 2). In other words: "Who do you think you are, Job?" Job's words lacked the knowledge he ought to have had, and God will drive that home to him.
The charge is not that Job was godless. It is about the limits of what he knew. God now turns the questions back on the man who had been asking them.
"Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" He does not mean that Job did not know Him at all. He did mean that Job's knowledge was limited, and that he knew nothing like enough about God's dealings… God is going to ask him many questions. Job had been questioning the dealings of God. Now God turns it back on him; now He says, I am going to ask you, and answer Me like a man if you can.
This rebuke is not God abandoning Job. It is proof of a living link between them.
It was meant to be a rebuke and that Job should really feel it and profit by it. And it is a terrible thing where God does not rebuke a soul upon the earth. What does it mean? It means judgment by and by for ever. God steps into the lives of those He has brought into living relationship with Himself. That is not just the fact that they are in relationship — it is the proof of it.
Notice, too, how God speaks — He asks what a man can follow.
And yet Jehovah is not seeking to crush Job, but rather to bring him to a true knowledge of himself and of God. God will not ask questions which a man cannot understand… When Jehovah speaks to Job like this, it shows His purposes of mercy for him. His appeal is to reason, and so to conscience.
What follows this question is striking for what it leaves out. Job is never told why any of it happened.
The other very striking thing comes at the end. All the cloud of words had died away, and Jehovah answers Job out of the whirlwind. What will He say? How will He explain what Job's friends failed to explain? How will He finish the explanations Elihu began? He didn't do it! Not one word of explanation of Himself did God utter. Not one word to answer the questions that Job had asked. He spoke only about the things of this earth and nature.
God spoke to one man, but the question reaches far past him.
This is God's question to all the vain words of men. They may be the cries of imagined wrong. They may be the empty efforts of human reason to explain the state of the world around us, and of the human family in particular. Whatever form they take, they only darken true wisdom. Write this divine question over the doorway of every library. Its volumes of human science, history and philosophy shut out the revelation of God, whether on purpose or in ignorance.
- Darkening — to darken counsel is to hide God's purposes and the truth. Job spoiled his flood of words by exalting his own righteousness at God's expense.
- Addressed — the rebuke lands on Job, not Elihu. God confirms what Elihu said, then turns to the man who demanded an answer.
- Limited — the charge is not that Job knew nothing of God. It is that he knew far too little of God's dealings to say what he said.
- Merciful — God is not crushing Job but bringing him to know himself and God. He asks questions a man can follow. Where God never rebukes a soul, that silence is far worse.
- Unexplained — Job gets a voice, not a reason. God speaks of earth, sea and creature, and never tells him why the suffering came.
Gird up now thy loins like a man; and I will demand of thee, and inform thou me.
Job had ended his defence, sure that he could face God and win. God's answer comes back as a summons: stand up, and take questions.
Job had challenged the Almighty to meet him face to face. He thought he had spoken his last word.
Calamity had not broken him. Insult and scorn could not subdue his proud spirit. He would hold his head up without fear before the best of his fellow men. Even in the presence of the Almighty he would stand up as a prince. What could a man say after that? That surely was the climax, the limit, and Job felt it so to be, for he added, "The words of Job are ended." But they were not. The Almighty took up his challenge. He had heard all his proud words and now He answers him and demands that Job should open his mouth again.
The word for "man" in God's reply is not the word Job had used of himself.
If he had longed wistfully to find God, Jehovah does answer him... He had asked God, challenging Him to such a meeting. God replies: "Gird up now your loins like a man." It is not now, "What is mortal man?" as Job had said... He used the word "man" in the sense of mortality or weakness. But God uses a very different word: "Gird up now your loins like a hero," for that is pretty much the force of the word. It means a strong man. He had challenged God to this judicial trial, and he was now heard.
Older translations read "gird up your loins" where the ESV has "dress for action." The picture comes from everyday clothing. The New Testament uses the same figure for a heart put in order before any work starts.
"Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth." This is the first thing... Our state comes first, and there is no divine activity until the heart is perfectly in order. The loins are the seat of strength when they are properly tied up. But they stand for the deep affections and movements of the heart. This picture comes from the customs of the country where these instructions were given. People there wore long garments, which got in the way of their work unless they tied them up. We get the expression in Job 38:3 — "Gird up now your loins like a man" — that is, to see what he had to say to God.
Job had been putting God's dealings on trial. Now God turns the questioning around and tells Job to make things known to Him.
And Jehovah does answer out of the storm. He challenges Job to gird up his loins as a hero: let the creature then make the Creator know, seeing that He now asks questions of him! What a proud thing the flesh is, and no better in the saint than in the sinner! Would Job also set aside the moral dealings of Jehovah? Worse still, would he condemn Him so as to justify himself? Grace produces the exact opposite in every soul born of God. It makes a person ready to take God's part against self, to judge his own ways, and to bow to the word.
The summons sounds severe. Writers read it as kindness rather than crushing.
And yet Jehovah is not seeking to crush Job, but rather to bring him to a true knowledge of himself and of God. Let him gird up his loins like a man. God will not ask questions which a man cannot understand. His loins are girded with truth, and he can answer — as indeed he does — these questions. The very fact that Jehovah addresses Job this way shows His purposes of mercy for him. His appeal is to reason, and so to conscience.
One writer draws out the limit God sets on what He asks.
God expects Job to take only a man's place. The questions God asks are simple enough for a man to understand. Yet Job would find himself helpless to answer them.
- Challenge — Job demanded that the Almighty answer him and said he would approach Him as a prince. This verse is God accepting that challenge.
- Strength — The word for "man" here means a hero, a strong man, not the frail mortal Job had called himself.
- Girding — People tied up their long robes before work. The picture is a heart set in order, the same figure as the belt of truth.
- Reversal — God now asks the creature to inform the Creator. Grace produces the opposite instinct: taking God's part against self.
- Mercy — God does not ask what a man cannot understand. The appeal to reason and conscience shows His purpose was Job's recovery, not his ruin.
Where wast thou when I founded the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding.
Job had defended his innocence at length and questioned God's fairness. God answers at last — not with an explanation of Job's suffering, but with a question about how the earth began.
God's reply is made of questions. They test whether Job is fit to judge God at all.
The whole address is largely in the form of questions. Job had presumed to sit in judgment on the Lord and His ways; his competence for this is tested: what does he know? What can he do? The creature is so small in power, so ignorant, and yet so full of empty pride. Shall he presume to instruct God about His duties, to point out His failures, in fact to take over what belongs to Him alone?
God speaks like a builder laying a foundation. Yet the earth hangs in space with nothing under it. One writer asks how that can be, and who was there to watch it happen.
"Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?" (v.4). Does the earth have foundations — an earth that turns in space with nothing to hold it up? Yes, it could not even exist without a basic foundation of truth, but could Job explain this? Can anyone today explain it? No! For one thing, none of us was present when God laid these foundations. And who can understand how creation came into existence? "For he spoke, and it came to be; he commanded, and it stood firm" (Psalm 33:9). The earth's foundations and the earth itself were created at the same instant, simply by the word of God.
Many readers expect God's speech to explain why Job suffered. One writer notes it does not — not even to finish what Elihu, the last man to speak before God, had started.
When, in the end, all the cloud of words had died away, the Lord answers Job out of the whirlwind. What will He say? How will He explain the things that Job's friends have failed to explain? How will He complete the explanations that Elihu began? He didn't do it! God did not utter one word of explanation about Himself. Not one word to answer the questions Job had asked. His words were entirely about the things of this earth and of nature.
Some assume science has now answered what Job could not. One writer replies that naming a law is not the same as naming the Law-giver.
Present-day knowledge can talk in a learned way about nebulae and the solar system, about attraction and the laws of gravitation. It can explain how these laws work together to give the earth its shape and its stable place among the heavenly bodies. It can explain how the particles of the earth hold together, by the laws of cohesion and chemical affinity. But law means a Law-giver. Who established these laws? How do they act without ever failing? Revelation, and revelation alone, gives the answer — "in him all things hold together" (Col. 1:17). Where was Job, where was man, when the Lord established and set these laws in motion?
God's questions stay on the outward world. One writer weighs that world against something far greater.
In these words God takes up only a small part of His wisdom and power in the outward world. He does so because that part is so small a thing compared with the ways of His grace. They are no more than what, so to speak, His fingers have formed... Do you suppose that His ways with us are merely the product of such skill? They speak of incomparably more. His heart, His thoughts, His plan of love and goodness — all that God is — has come out in the blessing of His saints.
Job already believed God existed. The verse still asks him to answer "if you have understanding" — and one writer points to what his faith was missing.
"Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?" "By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God." This is where faith begins. So is the truth that whoever comes to God must believe that He is. Job did believe in God as existing, but his faith was not simple and settled in the might of God, in His greatness. He is now called to consider whether he could explain or know the origin of any of God's works.
- Absent — Job was not there when the earth was founded. He judged how God runs a world whose first moment he never saw.
- Unanswerable — Neither Job nor modern science can say who laid the earth's foundation. Describing a law is not the same as naming the Law-giver.
- Unexplained — God never tells Job why he suffered. He answers a demand for reasons by displaying Himself instead.
- Outer edge — Creation is only the fringe of God's wisdom. If the fringe silences us, His deeper ways in grace are far beyond our judgment.
- Faith — Job's need was not more facts but settled trust in God's greatness. That trust is where real understanding begins.
Who set the measures thereof -- if thou knowest? or who stretched a line upon it?
At last God speaks to Job, and He answers with questions instead of explanations. They start with the earth: who measured it, and who stretched the line across it — and the aside "surely you know!" shows he cannot say.
Job had spent chapter after chapter demanding that God explain Himself. When God answers, He reverses the roles and puts Job in the witness box.
"Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" He does not mean that Job did not know Him at all. But He did mean that his knowledge was limited, and that he had no adequate knowledge of the dealings of God. Job had been questioning the dealings of God. Now God turns it back on him; now He says, I am going to ask you, and answer Me like a man if you can. "Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?" What an overwhelming question! What did Job know about it? "Who determined its measurements — surely you know!" He did not know. "Or who stretched the line upon it?"
The words "surely you know" invite an answer Job cannot give. He knows only that God could have done it.
"Who determined its measurements — surely you know!" (v.5). Of course Job knew that only God could do this. "Who stretched the line upon it? To what were its foundations fastened?" (v.6). Certainly the foundations of the earth are not fastened to anything visible to us. Whether Job knew this at that time or not, he could not answer God's question.
One writer hears an echo of this verse in Paul's own talk of measure.
It almost looks as if Paul were alluding to God's work in creation, as stated in Job 38:5, where God Himself asks, of the earth, "Who determined its measurements — surely you know! Or who stretched the line upon it?" He is a God who works by measure and by line, whether in creation or in the administration connected with His grace.
Later generations can describe how the earth holds together far better than Job could. Describing is not the same as answering.
Present day knowledge can speak in detail about nebulae and the solar system, about attraction and the laws of gravitation. It can explain that the working together of these laws has given the earth its shape and its steady relation to the heavenly bodies. It can explain that the particles of the earth cling together by the laws of cohesion and chemical affinity. But law means a Law-giver. Who has established these laws? How do they act unfailingly? Revelation, and that alone, gives the answer — "By Him all things consist" (Col. 1:17). Where was Job, where was man, when the Lord established and set in motion these laws and principles? The form of the question met Job's knowledge at that time; it equally meets man's advanced knowledge at the present.
One writer hears in God's "who?" a hint of Someone else present at creation.
Who, Jehovah further asks, has laid down the measures of this great fabric and set His line upon it? The question suggests the possibility of another Presence. It points to One who was with Him, and who acted for Him in laying down and carrying out the whole vast plan. Who was this? "The Lord possessed Me in the beginning of His way, before His works of old… Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth" (Prov. 8:22, 25). Or in the language of the New Testament, "All things were made by Him" (John 1:3).
The tone sounds crushing. The aim is not.
And yet Jehovah is not seeking to crush Job. He is seeking to bring him to a true knowledge of himself and of God… The very fact that Jehovah addresses Job in this way shows His purposes of mercy for him. His appeal is to reason, and so to conscience. He leads Job through the vast, and yet familiar, scenes of creation. Can he solve one of ten thousand of its riddles?
The questions do their work. By the end Job is not better informed; he is changed.
Though Job had heard something about the Lord, it was not enough to meet Job's actual need. Now the Lord brought him face to face with His own greatness and glory. The result was, "I abhor myself." It was not simply a matter of what he had done that he abhorred, but himself. This was the root of what he may have done, and God was dealing with that root: the pride of Job's very character. Every believer needs to be brought down to this very point.
- Reversal. Job demanded answers from God; God answers by asking, and the first question is one Job cannot touch.
- Silence. "Surely you know" asks for an answer Job cannot give. He knows only that God did it.
- Measure. The line and the measurements show a God who works by exact proportion, in creation and in His dealings of grace alike.
- Law-giver. Science can describe the laws that hold the earth together. It still cannot say who set them, so the question meets today's reader as it met Job.
- Mercy. The questions are not meant to crush, but to bring a man to know himself and God. They end not in information but in "I abhor myself."
Whereupon were the foundations thereof sunken? or who laid its corner-stone,
God finally answers Job out of the storm, and He begins not with Job's suffering but with the making of the world. The verse reads like a builder's challenge — footings, a cornerstone, a site no human being ever saw.
These questions are not curiosity. God aims them at a man who had argued with Him about His government. They show how little Job knows of even the outer edge of God's power.
God appears on the scene for the express purpose of flattening the pretensions of man. He does it in the most magnificent language, as far as I know, that was ever spoken on such subjects — language worthy of Him who is said to have spoken it. Jehovah appears to put Job in his true place, and that place was dust and ashes. Jehovah only touches the skirts of His power, the outer edge of His glory; yet what had man to say? And did he who could not explain God's least things presume to judge the deepest part of His ways and designs?
Footings for the earth raise an obvious problem. What could they rest on? One writer, whose translation reads "foundations" where the ESV has "bases," finds two truths here. He notes that Scripture stated the second long before anyone else did.
"To what were its foundations fastened?" Two things are true of the earth. Stability for the time — that is the point here, and that is why the verse speaks of foundations. But this same book of Job gives another view: the earth hangs on nothing. That never entered anyone's mind until recent times. Even scientists have only just arrived at it. But there it was in Scripture before them.
Ordinary builders sink footings into rock or sand. God had neither.
Jehovah begins with the earth, the home of man. Does Job know the history of his own dwelling place? Where was he when the great Architect laid its foundations? They were sunk not in shifting sand, nor on lasting rock, but in the empty space of apparent nothingness.
The measuring line of the previous verse hints at more than one worker on the project, and commentators trace that hint through the rest of Scripture.
Who, Jehovah further asks, has laid down the measures of this great structure and set His line upon it? The question suggests the possibility of another Presence, of One who was with Him, His agent in laying down and carrying out the whole vast plan. Who was this? "The LORD possessed Me at the beginning of His work, the first of His acts of old… Before the mountains had been shaped, before the hills, I was brought forth" (Prov. 8:22, 25). Or in the language of the New Testament, "All things were made through Him" (John 1:3). Here was a truth more wonderful even than creation.
Job could not answer. Neither, says one writer, can the laboratory — and the search for the bottom-most law drives the reader past nature to Christ.
The corner stone, the foundation of the earth — who laid it? Where is it? What is the basic law of physics or of chemistry? Does science know any more now than Job did then? Atoms and ions are grouped together, clasped and unclasped, as other great laws are brought to bear on them. Where is the foundational law? "For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ" (1 Cor. 3:11). To be brought to God, to know Him, is the object of all facts.
Job was absent, but the site was not empty. The singing of verse 7 tells us who stood there.
God is speaking here to Job, a man on earth. He names sons of God who were present, and who showed their delight, when He made the foundation of the earth firm and laid the corner-stone. Intelligent creatures, heavenly beings, already existed then, and they watched God prepare the earth for man.
- Who asks — God meets Job's complaints with questions. They put a man who judged His deepest ways back where he belongs: dust and ashes.
- Who founded — the earth stands firm, yet hangs on nothing. Scripture said so long before science caught up.
- Who else was there — the question hints at Another present at the work, spoken of in Proverbs 8 and in "All things were made through Him."
- Who laid the cornerstone — no chemistry or physics reaches the foundational law. The only foundation anyone can build on is Jesus Christ.
- Who watched — heavenly beings already existed. They showed their delight as God prepared the earth for man, and man himself was nowhere on the scene.
When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
God answers Job by asking about the day He laid the earth's foundations. Job was not there to see it, but others were — and they sang.
Job had spoken and murmured against God. God's reply strips away every claim man makes for himself.
God appears on the scene for the express purpose of destroying the pretensions of man. Here the Lord uses the most magnificent language I know of on such subjects. He appears to put Job in his true place, and that place was dust and ashes. Who and what was Job to speak or murmur against God? The Lord only touches the skirts of His power, the outer edge of His glory; yet what had man to say? And did the man who could not explain God's least things presume to judge the deepest part of His ways and designs?
The verse names two choirs. One is named "sons of God." Who they are answers another question: when did angels come into being?
There is no doubt the sons of God are angels (Job 1:6), who were therefore created before the earth was. If "the morning stars" are literal stars, then the stars too were created before the earth was. Some may object that Genesis 1:16 seems to place the making of the stars on the fourth day, when the earth was made over. But that notice is likely not in time order. It records a creation earlier than the history of the fourth day. We may question whether literal stars can sing, but science tells us a harmony of sound comes from the stars. At the very least there was a great celebration among God's creatures when He created the earth.
Commentators differ here. The next writer reads the stars' song as poetry, and the angels' shout as a sound truly heard.
Job 38:7 seems to express in poetry the joy of the heavenly bodies when God first brought them in as the hosts of heaven. With it came the audible shout of the angels, whom this book, like Genesis, calls God's sons.
The name given to these beings says something about their character. Their joy also stands in contrast with a confession that is forced.
The expression "sons of God" seems to suggest not merely a spirit-nature, but moral likeness to God as well. The mention of "Satan" in contrast underlines this further. "Sons of God" shouted for joy when God founded the material universe. We know too that infernal beings will also own that Jesus Christ is Lord (Philippians 2:10-11). But that is by compulsion; the worship of the "sons of God" flows out of their hearts.
That first chorus did not last. One writer follows what became of creation's music, and what will become of it.
There has been a creation song, when the earth came fresh from the hands of God and "the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy." But sin spoiled that beautiful creation, and singing gave way to weeping, and songs to groans. In the thousand-year day to come, earth will become new. Creation's groan will stop, and heaven and earth will unite in a new song.
The song here answers a question God asks just before it: who laid the earth's corner stone? Science still has no answer.
The corner stone, the foundation of the earth — who laid it? Where is it? What is the basic law of physics or of chemistry? Does science know now any more than Job did then? Other great laws come to bear on atoms and ions, grouping them, clasping and unclasping them. Where is the foundation law? "For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ" (1 Corinthians 3:11). To be brought to God, to know Him, is the object of all facts, and nature is only in harmony with the great mediatorial law when it leads us to Him. Only when seen this way do we hear the morning stars sing together. Only then do the sons of God shout aloud for joy.
- Foundation. God answers Job's complaint by pointing back to the day He founded the earth. Job never saw it, and he was in no place to judge the One who did.
- Witnesses. The "sons of God" are angels, so angels existed before the earth did. Some take the "morning stars" as literal stars; others as poetry for the same heavenly host.
- Worship. Their shout was not forced. Evil powers will one day confess Christ because they must; these sang out of their hearts.
- Silence. Sin broke the song: singing gave way to weeping, and songs to groans.
- New song. The corner stone question points past physics to Christ. The earth that lost its music will join heaven in a new song.