Job 38–41

Job 38:1 · Darby

And Jehovah answered Job out of the whirlwind and said,

Job and his friends have argued for chapter after chapter, and Elihu has spoken last. Now God answers for Himself. Why does He speak out of a storm? And why does the man who begged for this meeting end up wishing he had stayed silent?

The meeting Job asked for

Job had cried out for a hearing with God. One writer notes how that cry was answered: by word, not by sight, and only once Elihu had finished.

One more thing crowns Elihu's work: the incomparable favour Job had also, in a frantic way, begged for. He asked that a man rather than God might meet him; but he asked that he might find God too. And so he does. God appears. Jehovah Himself gives His answer from the whirlwind... this is the special value at the close of the book of Job: God does not wait until the day of judgment to decide where there is faith to look for Him. Only now it is His word, and in no way an appearance of God in visible form. Jehovah meets him here, when Elihu's word had done its work.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The name that returns

The Hebrew name behind "the LORD" has been almost absent since chapter 2. Here it returns, and with it a rebuke that is better than God's silence.

Here, then, we have Jehovah — notice that this name has not appeared after Job 2 (except in Job 12:9) in the historical part... He speaks according to His authority and His relationship. That is exactly what "Jehovah" means. It is God not merely in the abstract, but God in relation to man upon the earth. And so He answers Job. But He answers him here because it was a rebuke out of the whirlwind... And it is a terrible thing when God does not rebuke a soul upon the earth. What does it mean? It means judgment by and by for ever. Everyone God brings into living relationship with Himself has His interference.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why a whirlwind

The storm is not just scenery. God speaks from the very thing that pictured Job's confusion.

The whirlwind had continued a long time, and is still blowing when the Lord speaks in these verses. The whirlwind itself was meant to impress on Job that all his swirling troubles and confusion stood under the Creator's controlling hand. "The LORD has His way in the whirlwind and in the storm, and the clouds are the dust of His feet" (Nahum 1:3).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer notes what the roar of that wind really was, and who it was for.

Wind is not visible; yet when it blows hard, men feel its pressure and hear its roar. As the whirlwind came near, its roar was the voice of Jehovah Himself. He spoke to Job alone.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The charge: words without knowledge

God's opening question is aimed at Job, not at Elihu. It exposes what all his words had achieved.

Out of that whirlwind Jehovah replies to Job's empty questions and laments — not to Elihu, who had been God's spokesman leading up to this. So it was not Elihu who darkened counsel. "My desire is that the Almighty would answer me," was Job's closing word (Job 31:35). He is now to have his wish granted; but how different the effect! "As a prince would I go near to Him" (v. 37), he had declared. "I am vile" is what he has to say when he hears His voice. Jehovah asks, "Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" To darken counsel is to hide the purposes of God and the truth. Job had poured out a flood of words — laments, protests, accusations. Much was true and excellent. But as far as God's purposes went, it was all spoiled by one thing: he exalted his own righteousness at the expense of Jehovah's.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An answer that explains nothing

What follows this verse is striking for what it leaves out.

The other very striking thing comes at the end. All the cloud of words had died away, and Jehovah answers Job out of the whirlwind. What will He say?... He didn't do it! Not one word of explanation of Himself did God utter. Not one word to answer the questions that Job had asked. His words were entirely concerned with the things of this earth and nature.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

What the voice accomplished

Where all the arguing had failed, God's presence succeeded.

These moments in the presence of God produced a result that all the talk of the three friends, and even of Elihu, had not achieved. Here was a man who stood out among men, with a good word from God Himself. Now he had discovered his own utter sinfulness in the deepest springs of his being. A discovery we all in our turn have to make!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Asked — Job begged for a hearing with God, and he got it: by God's word, not by a vision.

- Answered — God speaks out of the whirlwind. The swirling trouble that had spun Job's life around was always under the Creator's hand.

- Named — the name "Jehovah" returns after chapter 2. It means God in relationship, so even His rebuke proves that relationship is alive.

- Silent — He explains nothing about Job's suffering. He speaks only of earth, sky and creatures.

- Seen — that presence did what three friends and Elihu could not. Job saw his own sinfulness and called himself vile.

Job 38:2 · Darby

Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?

After chapters of argument, and then Elihu's speech, God answers Job out of the storm — and His first word is a question, not comfort. Who is He rebuking, what does it mean to "darken counsel," and why does He open with a challenge instead of an answer?

The Answer Job Asked For

Job had begged for a hearing from God. He gets it — but not the effect he expected. God's question exposes who is speaking.

"My desire is that the Almighty would answer me," was Job's closing word (Job 31:35). He is now to have his wish granted; but how different the effect! "As a prince would I go near to Him" (v. 37), he had declared. "I am vile" is what he has to say when he hears His voice. Jehovah asks, "Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" To darken counsel is to hide the purposes of God and the truth. Job had poured out a flood of words — laments, protests, accusations. Much of it was true and excellent. But as far as God's purposes went, he spoiled it all by exalting his own righteousness at the expense of Jehovah's. Instead of light, the clear flame of divine truth, it was all a smoke-cloud of unbelief that blotted out the sun in the sky. Who is this? Is it some divine being, Jehovah's equal, calling the other's acts into question? Was it some mighty angel, gifted with heavenly wisdom, that dared lay a charge against his Maker? No, it was a man, frail, ignorant, sinful.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Aimed at Job, Not Elihu

Some read this opening line as a rebuke of Elihu, the young man who spoke last. The words themselves point elsewhere.

It should be very clear to everyone that God is not speaking to Elihu. He confirms what Elihu had said, and He answers Job directly (v. 1). Most of what God says is in the form of questions. His first question is, "Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" (v. 2). In other words: "Who do you think you are, Job?" Job's words lacked the knowledge he ought to have had, and God will drive that home to him.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What "Without Knowledge" Means

The charge is not that Job was godless. It is about the limits of what he knew. God now turns the questions back on the man who had been asking them.

"Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" He does not mean that Job did not know Him at all. He did mean that Job's knowledge was limited, and that he knew nothing like enough about God's dealings… God is going to ask him many questions. Job had been questioning the dealings of God. Now God turns it back on him; now He says, I am going to ask you, and answer Me like a man if you can.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Rebuke That Is Mercy

This rebuke is not God abandoning Job. It is proof of a living link between them.

It was meant to be a rebuke and that Job should really feel it and profit by it. And it is a terrible thing where God does not rebuke a soul upon the earth. What does it mean? It means judgment by and by for ever. God steps into the lives of those He has brought into living relationship with Himself. That is not just the fact that they are in relationship — it is the proof of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Notice, too, how God speaks — He asks what a man can follow.

And yet Jehovah is not seeking to crush Job, but rather to bring him to a true knowledge of himself and of God. God will not ask questions which a man cannot understand… When Jehovah speaks to Job like this, it shows His purposes of mercy for him. His appeal is to reason, and so to conscience.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

No Explanation Given

What follows this question is striking for what it leaves out. Job is never told why any of it happened.

The other very striking thing comes at the end. All the cloud of words had died away, and Jehovah answers Job out of the whirlwind. What will He say? How will He explain what Job's friends failed to explain? How will He finish the explanations Elihu began? He didn't do it! Not one word of explanation of Himself did God utter. Not one word to answer the questions that Job had asked. He spoke only about the things of this earth and nature.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The Question Still Stands

God spoke to one man, but the question reaches far past him.

This is God's question to all the vain words of men. They may be the cries of imagined wrong. They may be the empty efforts of human reason to explain the state of the world around us, and of the human family in particular. Whatever form they take, they only darken true wisdom. Write this divine question over the doorway of every library. Its volumes of human science, history and philosophy shut out the revelation of God, whether on purpose or in ignorance.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Darkening — to darken counsel is to hide God's purposes and the truth. Job spoiled his flood of words by exalting his own righteousness at God's expense.

- Addressed — the rebuke lands on Job, not Elihu. God confirms what Elihu said, then turns to the man who demanded an answer.

- Limited — the charge is not that Job knew nothing of God. It is that he knew far too little of God's dealings to say what he said.

- Merciful — God is not crushing Job but bringing him to know himself and God. He asks questions a man can follow. Where God never rebukes a soul, that silence is far worse.

- Unexplained — Job gets a voice, not a reason. God speaks of earth, sea and creature, and never tells him why the suffering came.

Job 38:3 · Darby

Gird up now thy loins like a man; and I will demand of thee, and inform thou me.

Job had ended his defence, sure that he could face God and win. God's answer comes back as a summons: stand up, and take questions.

A Challenge Taken Up

Job had challenged the Almighty to meet him face to face. He thought he had spoken his last word.

Calamity had not broken him. Insult and scorn could not subdue his proud spirit. He would hold his head up without fear before the best of his fellow men. Even in the presence of the Almighty he would stand up as a prince. What could a man say after that? That surely was the climax, the limit, and Job felt it so to be, for he added, "The words of Job are ended." But they were not. The Almighty took up his challenge. He had heard all his proud words and now He answers him and demands that Job should open his mouth again.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

"Like a Man" — the Force of the Word

The word for "man" in God's reply is not the word Job had used of himself.

If he had longed wistfully to find God, Jehovah does answer him... He had asked God, challenging Him to such a meeting. God replies: "Gird up now your loins like a man." It is not now, "What is mortal man?" as Job had said... He used the word "man" in the sense of mortality or weakness. But God uses a very different word: "Gird up now your loins like a hero," for that is pretty much the force of the word. It means a strong man. He had challenged God to this judicial trial, and he was now heard.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Girding the Loins

Older translations read "gird up your loins" where the ESV has "dress for action." The picture comes from everyday clothing. The New Testament uses the same figure for a heart put in order before any work starts.

"Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth." This is the first thing... Our state comes first, and there is no divine activity until the heart is perfectly in order. The loins are the seat of strength when they are properly tied up. But they stand for the deep affections and movements of the heart. This picture comes from the customs of the country where these instructions were given. People there wore long garments, which got in the way of their work unless they tied them up. We get the expression in Job 38:3 — "Gird up now your loins like a man" — that is, to see what he had to say to God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Roles Are Reversed

Job had been putting God's dealings on trial. Now God turns the questioning around and tells Job to make things known to Him.

And Jehovah does answer out of the storm. He challenges Job to gird up his loins as a hero: let the creature then make the Creator know, seeing that He now asks questions of him! What a proud thing the flesh is, and no better in the saint than in the sinner! Would Job also set aside the moral dealings of Jehovah? Worse still, would he condemn Him so as to justify himself? Grace produces the exact opposite in every soul born of God. It makes a person ready to take God's part against self, to judge his own ways, and to bow to the word.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Mercy in the Summons

The summons sounds severe. Writers read it as kindness rather than crushing.

And yet Jehovah is not seeking to crush Job, but rather to bring him to a true knowledge of himself and of God. Let him gird up his loins like a man. God will not ask questions which a man cannot understand. His loins are girded with truth, and he can answer — as indeed he does — these questions. The very fact that Jehovah addresses Job this way shows His purposes of mercy for him. His appeal is to reason, and so to conscience.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One writer draws out the limit God sets on what He asks.

God expects Job to take only a man's place. The questions God asks are simple enough for a man to understand. Yet Job would find himself helpless to answer them.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Challenge — Job demanded that the Almighty answer him and said he would approach Him as a prince. This verse is God accepting that challenge.

- Strength — The word for "man" here means a hero, a strong man, not the frail mortal Job had called himself.

- Girding — People tied up their long robes before work. The picture is a heart set in order, the same figure as the belt of truth.

- Reversal — God now asks the creature to inform the Creator. Grace produces the opposite instinct: taking God's part against self.

- Mercy — God does not ask what a man cannot understand. The appeal to reason and conscience shows His purpose was Job's recovery, not his ruin.

Job 38:4 · Darby

Where wast thou when I founded the earth? Declare, if thou hast understanding.

Job had defended his innocence at length and questioned God's fairness. God answers at last — not with an explanation of Job's suffering, but with a question about how the earth began.

A test of what Job knows

God's reply is made of questions. They test whether Job is fit to judge God at all.

The whole address is largely in the form of questions. Job had presumed to sit in judgment on the Lord and His ways; his competence for this is tested: what does he know? What can he do? The creature is so small in power, so ignorant, and yet so full of empty pride. Shall he presume to instruct God about His duties, to point out His failures, in fact to take over what belongs to Him alone?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The earth's foundation

God speaks like a builder laying a foundation. Yet the earth hangs in space with nothing under it. One writer asks how that can be, and who was there to watch it happen.

"Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?" (v.4). Does the earth have foundations — an earth that turns in space with nothing to hold it up? Yes, it could not even exist without a basic foundation of truth, but could Job explain this? Can anyone today explain it? No! For one thing, none of us was present when God laid these foundations. And who can understand how creation came into existence? "For he spoke, and it came to be; he commanded, and it stood firm" (Psalm 33:9). The earth's foundations and the earth itself were created at the same instant, simply by the word of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

No explanation given

Many readers expect God's speech to explain why Job suffered. One writer notes it does not — not even to finish what Elihu, the last man to speak before God, had started.

When, in the end, all the cloud of words had died away, the Lord answers Job out of the whirlwind. What will He say? How will He explain the things that Job's friends have failed to explain? How will He complete the explanations that Elihu began? He didn't do it! God did not utter one word of explanation about Himself. Not one word to answer the questions Job had asked. His words were entirely about the things of this earth and of nature.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Modern knowledge and the same question

Some assume science has now answered what Job could not. One writer replies that naming a law is not the same as naming the Law-giver.

Present-day knowledge can talk in a learned way about nebulae and the solar system, about attraction and the laws of gravitation. It can explain how these laws work together to give the earth its shape and its stable place among the heavenly bodies. It can explain how the particles of the earth hold together, by the laws of cohesion and chemical affinity. But law means a Law-giver. Who established these laws? How do they act without ever failing? Revelation, and revelation alone, gives the answer — "in him all things hold together" (Col. 1:17). Where was Job, where was man, when the Lord established and set these laws in motion?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Only the outer edge of His glory

God's questions stay on the outward world. One writer weighs that world against something far greater.

In these words God takes up only a small part of His wisdom and power in the outward world. He does so because that part is so small a thing compared with the ways of His grace. They are no more than what, so to speak, His fingers have formed... Do you suppose that His ways with us are merely the product of such skill? They speak of incomparably more. His heart, His thoughts, His plan of love and goodness — all that God is — has come out in the blessing of His saints.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where faith starts

Job already believed God existed. The verse still asks him to answer "if you have understanding" — and one writer points to what his faith was missing.

"Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?" "By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God." This is where faith begins. So is the truth that whoever comes to God must believe that He is. Job did believe in God as existing, but his faith was not simple and settled in the might of God, in His greatness. He is now called to consider whether he could explain or know the origin of any of God's works.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Absent — Job was not there when the earth was founded. He judged how God runs a world whose first moment he never saw.

- Unanswerable — Neither Job nor modern science can say who laid the earth's foundation. Describing a law is not the same as naming the Law-giver.

- Unexplained — God never tells Job why he suffered. He answers a demand for reasons by displaying Himself instead.

- Outer edge — Creation is only the fringe of God's wisdom. If the fringe silences us, His deeper ways in grace are far beyond our judgment.

- Faith — Job's need was not more facts but settled trust in God's greatness. That trust is where real understanding begins.

Job 38:5 · Darby

Who set the measures thereof -- if thou knowest? or who stretched a line upon it?

At last God speaks to Job, and He answers with questions instead of explanations. They start with the earth: who measured it, and who stretched the line across it — and the aside "surely you know!" shows he cannot say.

The questioner questioned

Job had spent chapter after chapter demanding that God explain Himself. When God answers, He reverses the roles and puts Job in the witness box.

"Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge?" He does not mean that Job did not know Him at all. But He did mean that his knowledge was limited, and that he had no adequate knowledge of the dealings of God. Job had been questioning the dealings of God. Now God turns it back on him; now He says, I am going to ask you, and answer Me like a man if you can. "Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?" What an overwhelming question! What did Job know about it? "Who determined its measurements — surely you know!" He did not know. "Or who stretched the line upon it?"

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

An examination Job could not pass

The words "surely you know" invite an answer Job cannot give. He knows only that God could have done it.

"Who determined its measurements — surely you know!" (v.5). Of course Job knew that only God could do this. "Who stretched the line upon it? To what were its foundations fastened?" (v.6). Certainly the foundations of the earth are not fastened to anything visible to us. Whether Job knew this at that time or not, he could not answer God's question.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Measure and line

One writer hears an echo of this verse in Paul's own talk of measure.

It almost looks as if Paul were alluding to God's work in creation, as stated in Job 38:5, where God Himself asks, of the earth, "Who determined its measurements — surely you know! Or who stretched the line upon it?" He is a God who works by measure and by line, whether in creation or in the administration connected with His grace.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Knowledge that has grown, silence that has not

Later generations can describe how the earth holds together far better than Job could. Describing is not the same as answering.

Present day knowledge can speak in detail about nebulae and the solar system, about attraction and the laws of gravitation. It can explain that the working together of these laws has given the earth its shape and its steady relation to the heavenly bodies. It can explain that the particles of the earth cling together by the laws of cohesion and chemical affinity. But law means a Law-giver. Who has established these laws? How do they act unfailingly? Revelation, and that alone, gives the answer — "By Him all things consist" (Col. 1:17). Where was Job, where was man, when the Lord established and set in motion these laws and principles? The form of the question met Job's knowledge at that time; it equally meets man's advanced knowledge at the present.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Who held the line?

One writer hears in God's "who?" a hint of Someone else present at creation.

Who, Jehovah further asks, has laid down the measures of this great fabric and set His line upon it? The question suggests the possibility of another Presence. It points to One who was with Him, and who acted for Him in laying down and carrying out the whole vast plan. Who was this? "The Lord possessed Me in the beginning of His way, before His works of old… Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth" (Prov. 8:22, 25). Or in the language of the New Testament, "All things were made by Him" (John 1:3).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The kindness behind the cross-examination

The tone sounds crushing. The aim is not.

And yet Jehovah is not seeking to crush Job. He is seeking to bring him to a true knowledge of himself and of God… The very fact that Jehovah addresses Job in this way shows His purposes of mercy for him. His appeal is to reason, and so to conscience. He leads Job through the vast, and yet familiar, scenes of creation. Can he solve one of ten thousand of its riddles?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where the questions land

The questions do their work. By the end Job is not better informed; he is changed.

Though Job had heard something about the Lord, it was not enough to meet Job's actual need. Now the Lord brought him face to face with His own greatness and glory. The result was, "I abhor myself." It was not simply a matter of what he had done that he abhorred, but himself. This was the root of what he may have done, and God was dealing with that root: the pride of Job's very character. Every believer needs to be brought down to this very point.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Reversal. Job demanded answers from God; God answers by asking, and the first question is one Job cannot touch.

- Silence. "Surely you know" asks for an answer Job cannot give. He knows only that God did it.

- Measure. The line and the measurements show a God who works by exact proportion, in creation and in His dealings of grace alike.

- Law-giver. Science can describe the laws that hold the earth together. It still cannot say who set them, so the question meets today's reader as it met Job.

- Mercy. The questions are not meant to crush, but to bring a man to know himself and God. They end not in information but in "I abhor myself."

Job 38:6 · Darby

Whereupon were the foundations thereof sunken? or who laid its corner-stone,

God finally answers Job out of the storm, and He begins not with Job's suffering but with the making of the world. The verse reads like a builder's challenge — footings, a cornerstone, a site no human being ever saw.

Why God asks instead of explains

These questions are not curiosity. God aims them at a man who had argued with Him about His government. They show how little Job knows of even the outer edge of God's power.

God appears on the scene for the express purpose of flattening the pretensions of man. He does it in the most magnificent language, as far as I know, that was ever spoken on such subjects — language worthy of Him who is said to have spoken it. Jehovah appears to put Job in his true place, and that place was dust and ashes. Jehovah only touches the skirts of His power, the outer edge of His glory; yet what had man to say? And did he who could not explain God's least things presume to judge the deepest part of His ways and designs?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Foundations for a world that hangs on nothing

Footings for the earth raise an obvious problem. What could they rest on? One writer, whose translation reads "foundations" where the ESV has "bases," finds two truths here. He notes that Scripture stated the second long before anyone else did.

"To what were its foundations fastened?" Two things are true of the earth. Stability for the time — that is the point here, and that is why the verse speaks of foundations. But this same book of Job gives another view: the earth hangs on nothing. That never entered anyone's mind until recent times. Even scientists have only just arrived at it. But there it was in Scripture before them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Architect and His building site

Ordinary builders sink footings into rock or sand. God had neither.

Jehovah begins with the earth, the home of man. Does Job know the history of his own dwelling place? Where was he when the great Architect laid its foundations? They were sunk not in shifting sand, nor on lasting rock, but in the empty space of apparent nothingness.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Who stretched the line?

The measuring line of the previous verse hints at more than one worker on the project, and commentators trace that hint through the rest of Scripture.

Who, Jehovah further asks, has laid down the measures of this great structure and set His line upon it? The question suggests the possibility of another Presence, of One who was with Him, His agent in laying down and carrying out the whole vast plan. Who was this? "The LORD possessed Me at the beginning of His work, the first of His acts of old… Before the mountains had been shaped, before the hills, I was brought forth" (Prov. 8:22, 25). Or in the language of the New Testament, "All things were made through Him" (John 1:3). Here was a truth more wonderful even than creation.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The cornerstone modern knowledge still cannot locate

Job could not answer. Neither, says one writer, can the laboratory — and the search for the bottom-most law drives the reader past nature to Christ.

The corner stone, the foundation of the earth — who laid it? Where is it? What is the basic law of physics or of chemistry? Does science know any more now than Job did then? Atoms and ions are grouped together, clasped and unclasped, as other great laws are brought to bear on them. Where is the foundational law? "For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ" (1 Cor. 3:11). To be brought to God, to know Him, is the object of all facts.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Someone was watching

Job was absent, but the site was not empty. The singing of verse 7 tells us who stood there.

God is speaking here to Job, a man on earth. He names sons of God who were present, and who showed their delight, when He made the foundation of the earth firm and laid the corner-stone. Intelligent creatures, heavenly beings, already existed then, and they watched God prepare the earth for man.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Summary

- Who asks — God meets Job's complaints with questions. They put a man who judged His deepest ways back where he belongs: dust and ashes.

- Who founded — the earth stands firm, yet hangs on nothing. Scripture said so long before science caught up.

- Who else was there — the question hints at Another present at the work, spoken of in Proverbs 8 and in "All things were made through Him."

- Who laid the cornerstone — no chemistry or physics reaches the foundational law. The only foundation anyone can build on is Jesus Christ.

- Who watched — heavenly beings already existed. They showed their delight as God prepared the earth for man, and man himself was nowhere on the scene.

Job 38:7 · Darby

When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

God answers Job by asking about the day He laid the earth's foundations. Job was not there to see it, but others were — and they sang.

Why God Asks

Job had spoken and murmured against God. God's reply strips away every claim man makes for himself.

God appears on the scene for the express purpose of destroying the pretensions of man. Here the Lord uses the most magnificent language I know of on such subjects. He appears to put Job in his true place, and that place was dust and ashes. Who and what was Job to speak or murmur against God? The Lord only touches the skirts of His power, the outer edge of His glory; yet what had man to say? And did the man who could not explain God's least things presume to judge the deepest part of His ways and designs?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Was Singing

The verse names two choirs. One is named "sons of God." Who they are answers another question: when did angels come into being?

There is no doubt the sons of God are angels (Job 1:6), who were therefore created before the earth was. If "the morning stars" are literal stars, then the stars too were created before the earth was. Some may object that Genesis 1:16 seems to place the making of the stars on the fourth day, when the earth was made over. But that notice is likely not in time order. It records a creation earlier than the history of the fourth day. We may question whether literal stars can sing, but science tells us a harmony of sound comes from the stars. At the very least there was a great celebration among God's creatures when He created the earth.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. The next writer reads the stars' song as poetry, and the angels' shout as a sound truly heard.

Job 38:7 seems to express in poetry the joy of the heavenly bodies when God first brought them in as the hosts of heaven. With it came the audible shout of the angels, whom this book, like Genesis, calls God's sons.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Quality of Their Joy

The name given to these beings says something about their character. Their joy also stands in contrast with a confession that is forced.

The expression "sons of God" seems to suggest not merely a spirit-nature, but moral likeness to God as well. The mention of "Satan" in contrast underlines this further. "Sons of God" shouted for joy when God founded the material universe. We know too that infernal beings will also own that Jesus Christ is Lord (Philippians 2:10-11). But that is by compulsion; the worship of the "sons of God" flows out of their hearts.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Song That Stopped

That first chorus did not last. One writer follows what became of creation's music, and what will become of it.

There has been a creation song, when the earth came fresh from the hands of God and "the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy." But sin spoiled that beautiful creation, and singing gave way to weeping, and songs to groans. In the thousand-year day to come, earth will become new. Creation's groan will stop, and heaven and earth will unite in a new song.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The Corner Stone

The song here answers a question God asks just before it: who laid the earth's corner stone? Science still has no answer.

The corner stone, the foundation of the earth — who laid it? Where is it? What is the basic law of physics or of chemistry? Does science know now any more than Job did then? Other great laws come to bear on atoms and ions, grouping them, clasping and unclasping them. Where is the foundation law? "For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ" (1 Corinthians 3:11). To be brought to God, to know Him, is the object of all facts, and nature is only in harmony with the great mediatorial law when it leads us to Him. Only when seen this way do we hear the morning stars sing together. Only then do the sons of God shout aloud for joy.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Foundation. God answers Job's complaint by pointing back to the day He founded the earth. Job never saw it, and he was in no place to judge the One who did.

- Witnesses. The "sons of God" are angels, so angels existed before the earth did. Some take the "morning stars" as literal stars; others as poetry for the same heavenly host.

- Worship. Their shout was not forced. Evil powers will one day confess Christ because they must; these sang out of their hearts.

- Silence. Sin broke the song: singing gave way to weeping, and songs to groans.

- New song. The corner stone question points past physics to Christ. The earth that lost its music will join heaven in a new song.

Job 38:8 · Darby

And who shut up the sea with doors, when it burst forth, issuing out of the womb?

God answers Job out of the storm with questions, turning from the earth's foundations to the birth of the sea. The sea bursts out like a newborn, and God shuts the doors on it — so why ask a man crushed by suffering about waves?

Why God Asks Instead of Explains

Job wanted an answer about his suffering. What he gets is an examination paper on creation he cannot begin to fill in.

What questions these are. They cover every field of what man calls "natural sciences" — geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy, and so on. Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken his words would have been folly... But what is the aim of the Lord in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the needed true knowledge of himself and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Ocean as a Newborn Child

The imagery of the verse is birth. Something enormous and untamed bursts into being, and God treats it the way a mother treats an infant.

Well, it was a very bold child, this new ungovernable creature that came into existence! And so He speaks about covering it up and swaddling it. "And prescribed limits for it and set bars and doors, and said, Thus far shall you come, and no farther, and here shall your proud waves be stayed." For who can control the ocean?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer traces the same scene back to a world with no dry land.

Jehovah passes from the earth to "that great and wide sea." He describes it not in its original creation, as part of the heavens and the earth, but as gushing out from its mother's womb. It covered the whole face of the world, and "darkness was over the face of the deep." Left to itself it would have swallowed everything. But its Maker was its Master. He set bounds to it, breaking the land, as it were, into great mountain chains to make a place for it, barred and closed so it could not escape. Its storms and fury in His almighty hands are only the wailings of a newborn baby. He wraps it in the swaddling clothes of clouds and thick darkness, and hushes it to rest.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where Human Power Stops

Job faces a force he can sail on but never command.

Man gazes on it with awe, but cannot control its power. His "thousand fleets sweep over it in vain"; he "marks the earth with ruin," but his control stops at the shore.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Doors on the Sea of Evil

The God who set limits on the water sets limits on wickedness too.

So too in the ocean of evil — the pride of Satan which burst out in rebellion against God, when the angels did not keep their first position. God's restraining hand holds it all in check. The wicked, like the foaming sea, seem to rise higher and higher in their violence and pride. But God says to them, "Thus far shall you come, and no farther." In this way He shows His power to restrain evil. Job watched evil seem to win. He looked into the dark surging of his own self-willed heart. He might well have been appalled. Who but God can control evil?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same restraint protects God's people when the world threatens to overwhelm them.

The great Sea is a picture of the Gentile nations (Rev. 17:15). It is so often in a state of upheaval and unrest, seeking to push into the land, but the power of God holds it in check... Though the world may threaten to swamp the testimony of the people of God, yet God is greater than the world, and will preserve His people.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Swaddling Bands and the One Who Wore Them

Commentators differ on how far to press these images. One writer keeps the chapter to one theme — the greatness of God in nature. He writes: "Some see something typical in them but I do not believe there is the slightest justification for this" (Truth & Testimony). Another hears in the wrapping of the sea an echo of a later birth.

Creation itself is, we would reverently say, a divine humbling... The swaddling bands of Ocean are only a figure of those bands which He who made all things took upon Himself, when He became flesh. The whole universe, immense and boundless, forms the garments of the infinite God, who reveals Himself in this way.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Birth. God pictures the sea bursting out like a child from the womb — not a rival power, but a creature with a beginning.

- Doors. The One who made it wrapped it in cloud and darkness and set bars around it; its fury is only an infant's crying in His hands.

- Limits. Man sails the ocean but cannot govern it. His control stops at the shore, and so does his knowledge.

- Evil. The same hand that bounds the water bounds wickedness and Satan's pride: thus far, and no farther.

- Aim. God asks it all to humble a suffering man into true knowledge of himself — the reply Job needed, not the one he asked for.

Job 38:9 · Darby

When I made the cloud its garment, and thick darkness a swaddling band for it;

God answers Job's complaint with questions about the ocean: where it came from, and who dressed it. Here the sea, the one thing no man can control, is a newborn baby, and God wraps it in cloud.

A newborn wrapped in cloud

The verse belongs to a birth scene. The sea bursts out "from the womb" in verse 8. A swaddling band is the strip of cloth wrapped tightly round a newborn, and that is what God reaches for.

"Or who shut in the sea with doors, when it burst out from the womb? When I made clouds its garment and thick darkness its swaddling band." Well, it was a very bold child, this new creature that came into existence and would not be controlled! And so He speaks about covering it up and swaddling it. "And I marked out for it the limit I had decreed, and set bars and doors, and said, Thus far shall you come, and no farther; and here shall your proud waves be stayed" — for who can control the ocean?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Storm heard as an infant's cry

The same image explains why the sea has never swallowed the land.

Left to itself it would have covered everything. But its Maker was its Master, and He set bounds to it. He broke the land, as it were, into great mountain chains to make a place for the sea, barred and closed so nothing could escape. In His almighty hands its storms and fury are only the wailing of a newborn baby. He wraps it in the swaddling clothes of clouds and thick darkness, and hushes it to rest.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Which moment God is describing

One writer places this moment in the creation account. It is not the first act of creation, he says, but the day God divided the waters and dry land appeared.

"Who shut in the sea with doors?" (v. 8). God is not speaking here of the original creation. He is speaking of His separating the waters above from the waters beneath (Gen. 1:6-7). At first the earth was covered with water. Then He separated the waters and the dry land appeared. As the Word of God caused the appearance of the land, so His Word caused the waters to be gathered "into one place" (Gen. 1:9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God asks it at all

Job had set himself up as judge of how God runs the world. The question about the sea answers him by asking where he was.

God's first move is to overwhelm the man who claimed to sit in judgment on His moral ways. He makes Job feel his complete ignorance and powerlessness in the smallest works of divine power, even in creation. Where was Job when Jehovah founded the earth?… And where when He set limits to the sea? A man left baffled by such a question was in no position to judge God's deep things. Angels were there to shout for joy when the sea was born and wrapped in clouds and thick darkness. Its wild lawlessness fought to rise against God's restraint, but He set bars and doors.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same hand over evil

The line drawn for the sea is also drawn for evil.

It is the same with the ocean of evil — the pride of Satan that burst out in rebellion against God, when the angels did not keep their first place. God's restraining hand holds all in check. The wicked, like the foaming sea, seem to rise higher and higher in their violence and pride, but God says to them, "Thus far shall you come, and no farther." Job watched wickedness that seemed to be winning. He looked into the dark surging of his own self-willed heart. He might well have been appalled. Who but God can control evil?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The One who dressed the sea, asleep in a boat

One writer takes the verse to the disciples, alarmed by a storm at sea with their Lord in the boat.

Had they considered that He was the Creator of the universe, would they have felt a moment's alarm? Was it not He who, ages before, shut in the sea with doors and made clouds its garment? Was it not He who said, "Thus far shall you come, and no farther; and here shall your proud waves be stayed"? Would, or could, the sea swallow its own Lord and God?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Born. The sea bursts out of the womb — a new, bold creature no one can control.

- Wrapped. God's answer to that eruption is clothing, not combat: cloud for a garment, thick darkness for a swaddling band.

- Hushed. What overwhelms us is an infant's wailing in His hands; He wraps it and quiets it.

- Bounded. The same hand that dressed the ocean set bars and doors and a line it cannot cross. That restraint holds evil and the proud too, not just water.

- Silenced. Job had judged God's ways, but he was not there at the swaddling. The question leaves him no ground to judge God's deep things.

Job 38:10 · Darby

When I cut out for it my boundary, and set bars and doors,

God speaks out of the storm and turns Job's attention to the ocean — asking who fixed its limit and hung its gates. This is not a lesson in geography. God is questioning a proud man, and the answer reaches every force that rages and cannot be tamed.

Bars and Doors

The bars and doors of the verse are the coasts and mountains that hold the water in. One commentator goes back to the moment God shaped them.

The Lord turns from the earth to "that great and wide sea." He does not describe it in its original creation, as part of the heavens and the earth, but as gushing out from its mother's womb. It covered the whole face of the world, and "darkness was over the face of the deep." Left to itself it would have swallowed everything. But its Maker was its Master. He set bounds to it, breaking the land, so to speak, into great mountain chains to make a place for it, barred and shut so that it could not escape.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Author Behind the Law

A modern reader may say that physics holds the tides, not a word from God. One writer answers that.

People may speak of "natural laws" as causing this phenomenon, but who is the Author of natural law?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where Man's Power Ends

Man can sail across the limit God set, but he cannot move it.

At the beginning God restrained this restless mighty ocean. He restrained it again when in judgment He let it swallow the earth. Man gazes at it with awe, but cannot control its power. His "thousand fleets sweep over it in vain"; he "marks the earth with ruin," but his control stops at the shore.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Asks

God's speech is a string of questions Job cannot answer. One commentator states the purpose behind them, and notes that time has not improved our position.

Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken, his words would have been folly. And we, 3000 years or more later, with all our boasted progress and scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature, still cannot answer these questions in a satisfying way. … But what is the Lord's aim in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man, and to humble man. To bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needed, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Ocean of Evil

One writer applies the same limit to something Job found far more troubling than tides.

So too in the ocean of evil — the pride of Satan that burst out in rebellion against God, when the angels did not keep their first position. God's restraining hand holds everything in check. The wicked, like the foaming sea, seem to rise higher and higher in violence and pride. But God says to them, "Thus far shall you come, and no farther." This shows His restraining power over evil. Job watched wickedness that seemed to be winning, and he looked into the dark surging of his own self-willed heart. He might well have been horrified. Who but God can control evil?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Comfort for the Tossed

The same limit reaches Job's own suffering, and every believer's.

How striking is the spiritual meaning of God's control of the seas! Job felt as though the waves of the sea were swallowing him in a string of painful troubles that seemed out of control. Believers may pass through times of turbulent unrest and distress, as though tossed by the waves of a rolling sea. But God is in perfect control of it all, and He can quiet the sea at once, just as the Lord Jesus did when His disciples were so alarmed: "He awoke and rebuked the wind and said to the sea, 'Peace! Be still!' And the wind ceased, and there was a great calm" (Mark 4:39).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Limit. God carved out a place for the sea and barred it shut; left to itself the water would have covered everything.

- Limit set by a Person. Behind what we call natural law stands an Author — the boundary is a decree, not an accident.

- Limit man cannot move. Ships cross the ocean, but man's control stops at the shore. God's questions expose that and humble our pride.

- Limit on evil too. Satan's rebellion and human wickedness rise like foam. God says to them what He says to the surf: this far and no farther.

- Limit as comfort. The troubles that seem to be swallowing you are inside the boundary, and the One who set it can say "Peace! Be still!" and bring a great calm.

Job 38:11 · Darby

And said, Hitherto shalt thou come and no further, and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?

God answers Job out of the storm with question after question, and one is about the sea: who shut it in, and who told it where to stop? The answer is a boundary set by a voice — and Job's own life felt as wild as the surf.

Why God Asks About the Ocean

The speech is not a lecture on geography. Kelly reads it as God dismantling the confidence of a man who had been arguing his own case:

God appears on the scene for the express purpose of destroying the pretensions of man. Here He uses language more magnificent than any I know of on such subjects — language worthy of Him who is said to have spoken it. The LORD appears to put Job in his true place, and that place was dust and ashes. He only touches the edges of His power, the outer border of His glory; yet what had man to say? What could Job answer? Not a word. And did the man who could not explain God's least things presume to judge the deepest part of His ways and designs?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Sea As a Newborn Child

The picture in these verses is birth. Ridout follows it through to the calm at the end:

Left to itself it would have covered everything; but its Maker was its Master, and set bounds to it, breaking the land as it were into great mountain chains to make a place for it, barred and closed so it could not escape. Its storms and fury, in His almighty hands, are only the wailing of a newborn baby; He wraps it in the swaddling clothes of clouds and thick darkness, and hushes it to rest.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Law, Not an Accident

The sea's limit can look like nothing more than physics. Leslie Grant asks who stands behind the physics:

This is confirmed in verses 10 and 11. God "prescribed limits for it and set bars and doors" and said, "Thus far shall you come, and no farther." People may speak of "natural laws" as causing this, but who is the Author of natural law?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Same Voice in the Boat

The Gospels record that voice again. One writer ties this line to the moment the disciples watched a storm die at a word:

The disciples marvelled as He rebuked the winds and the sea. They did not understand that with them was the same blessed Person who once said to the sea, when God formed the earth, "Thus far shall you come, and no farther, and here shall your proud waves be stayed" (Job 38:11).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Proud Waves and Proud Wills

Ridout carries the boundary from water over into the moral world, where Job's own heart lay:

So too in the ocean of evil — the pride of Satan which burst out in rebellion against God, when the angels did not keep their first position. God's restraining hand holds it all in check. The wicked, like the foaming sea, seem to rise higher and higher in their violence and pride, but God says to them, "Thus far shall you come, and no farther." Job watched wickedness appear to win. He looked into the dark surging of his own self-willed heart. He might well have been horrified. Who but God can control evil?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Boundary Around a Sufferer

The same limit runs around a believer's suffering. Fereday ties the sea's fixed shore to Job's measured trial:

He who sits on the throne will never let the enemy seize the reins of government. His controlling hand measures everything that must fall upon His own, and the enemy has no power to go beyond that measure. When Satan sought Job's ruin, God allowed him to afflict Job only step by step, exactly as He prescribed.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

When the Restraint Becomes Removal

For now the waves are held back rather than removed. Ridout looks ahead to a state where the barrier is no longer needed:

We look forward to the time when this control will be absolute, in that new heavens and new earth, when "there shall be no more sea." On that day God will banish evil to its eternal home, away from His redeemed creation. Looking ahead to it, we can own Him as supreme alone.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- A line is drawn. God shut the sea behind bars and doors and told it where to stop — the coastline is a spoken command, not a coincidence.

- The line silences pride. God touches only the edges of His power, and Job has no answer. A man who cannot explain the tide cannot judge God's ways.

- The line has a voice. The One who hushed the newborn sea in clouds and darkness is the One the disciples watched still a storm with a word.

- The line runs around evil. Wickedness and Satan rise like surf and stop at the same command; God measured Job's own trial step by step.

- The line becomes absolute. In the new heavens and new earth there is no more sea — God banishes evil, and He alone is supreme.

Job 38:12 · Darby

Hast thou since thy days commanded the morning? hast thou caused the dawn to know its place,

God speaks to Job out of the storm. Instead of explaining his suffering, He asks questions about the world — the earth's foundations, the sea's limits, and now the daily arrival of light. The question is simple and unanswerable: has Job ever once given the order that started a morning?

Questions Instead of Answers

Job had set himself up to judge God's ways, and this is the answer he gets. The questions are not for information. They are meant to expose how little he knows about the ordinary workings of the world he lives in.

This is the man who claimed to sit in judgment on God's moral ways. The first thing done is to overwhelm him with the sense of his utter ignorance and powerlessness in the smallest things of divine energy, even in creation. Where was Job when Jehovah founded the earth? ... He whose understanding stood baffled at such a question was not in a position to judge of His deep things.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Beyond Human Command

The sunrise is the most familiar event there is. No one has ever caused one or delayed one.

Has Job ever commanded a single morning to appear, or caused the dawn to know the place of its appearing? With all his supposed knowledge and power, man cannot command the forces of nature to do his bidding. Day by day the light appears in its appointed place. It floods the earth with light, and the guilty flee from it. Evening falls, and no word of man can stop or hurry this constant action. Only One gave His command at the beginning: "Let there be light." Since that time evening and morning have known their appointed time and place.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Ridout notes two exceptions. Joshua halted the day, and the shadow moved back on King Hezekiah's sundial. Both happened at God's word, not man's.

Job's Own Night

The question lands hard because Job had been sitting in darkness, longing for relief. If commanding the morning were in his power, his troubles would already be over.

Did Job decide when the morning was to dawn? What a question for the man who thought he could in effect make God accountable to him! The morning always follows the night, and what man can change this amazing fact? Job had been feeling the darkness of night in the hard experiences he had suffered. If he could command the morning, then he could bring complete relief to the trials of darkness. But only God can cause the dawn to know its place.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Light That Uncovers

Daylight reaches the ends of the earth and ends the cover that night gives to evildoers.

"…that it might take hold of the ends of the earth" — that is, when the sun rises to gild it — "that the wicked might be shaken out of it?" The darkness of night gives the opportunity for murder and burglary and all the other crimes of men, more than any other time. "It is turned as clay to the seal." When the earth is in darkness, you can no more make it out than clay before the seal is pressed into it. But the moment the light shines, there you find its shape and its beauty as God fixed it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Morning Still to Come

Commentators read the sunrise here as a picture as well as a fact.

When the millennial day dawns it will embrace "the ends of the earth," and the wicked will be shaken out of it. The wicked love darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil. At that day the light of "the Sun of righteousness," rising with "healing in His wings," will expose them. The Lord Jesus, the true Light, will so expose the wicked as to shake them out of the earth.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Hope Hidden Inside the Rebuke

The questions humble Job, but there is kindness in the choice of subject. God picks the one thing that always ends — night.

This appeal to day and night is most effective. Shall Job accuse One who is Light, who sees all things as they are? Shall he doubt One who knows the secrets of his heart, and the reason for these chastenings? Do not these questions give a hint that God will cause Job's night to end, and at the appointed time cause His dawn to visit the poor sufferer?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Command. The morning comes by an order Job never gave. Only One said "Let there be light," and evening and morning have kept their appointed time ever since.

- Place. The dawn "knows its place." It rises where and when God appoints, and no human word can hurry it or hold it back.

- Exposure. Night is the cover for crime. When light takes hold of the ends of the earth, the world's shape stands out like clay under a seal, and evildoers are shaken out.

- Prospect. Writers see in that sunrise a picture of a coming day. The Sun of righteousness will rise, and the true Light will expose the wicked who loved darkness.

- Comfort. The same God who ends every night can end Job's. The question that humbles him also hints at a dawn appointed for him.

Job 38:13 · Darby

That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, and the wicked might be shaken out of it?

Out of the storm, God asks Job whether he has ever ordered a sunrise, sent its light to the far edges of the earth, and shaken the wicked off the ground. The question is not astronomy but a test: if Job cannot govern one daybreak, how can he judge the One who governs them all?

The Question Put to Job

Job had been demanding an explanation from God. God answers by asking who runs the daybreak.

Did Job decide when the morning was to dawn? (v.12). What a question for the man who thought he could in effect make God accountable to him! The morning always follows the night, and what man can change this amazing fact? Job had been feeling the darkness of night in the hard experiences he had suffered. If he could command the morning, then he could bring complete relief to the trials of darkness. But only God can cause the dawn to know its place.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Dawn Reaching the Edges of the Earth

First light spreads until it grips the far rim of the world — the "skirts", or ends, of the earth. With light comes a plain effect on how people behave.

"That it might take hold of the ends of the earth" — that is, when the sun rises to gild it, as it were — "that the wicked might be shaken out of it?" This is because the darkness of the night is exactly what gives the opportunity for murder and burglary and all the other crooked dealings of men more than any other time.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Light That Exposes

Nothing changes shape at sunrise; only what can be seen changes. The next verse compares this to soft clay taking the mark of a seal.

As the mark of the signet-ring on the formless clay, so the light stamps on the face of the earth the varied forms and colours of all things. They stand out like a lovely garment — or the reverse, a scene of ruin — under the light. The light shows all things as they are: "Anything that becomes visible is light" (Eph. 5:13). The night is the light of the wicked; they hate the light, and will not come to it, in case their deeds should be exposed. The coming of the light stops their deeds. Their uplifted arm is broken.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Picture of a Coming Day

Commentators also read this sunrise as the preview of a far larger daybreak.

Verse 13 reminds us that when the millennial day dawns it will embrace "the ends of the earth," and the wicked will be shaken out of it. The wicked, who love darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil, will at that day be exposed by the light of "the Sun of righteousness" arising with "healing in His wings." The Lord Jesus, the true Light, will so expose the wicked as to shake them out of the earth.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

How the Daylight Shapes a Life

The light that exposes evil also shapes how God's people live now, and where they will live at last.

So the light of God's presence detects evil. When He causes the dawning of a new day — "The day of the Lord" — evildoers will be shaken out of the earth. For this reason, His people, who are "children of light, children of the day," order their life by the light. For this reason, in that fair land where there is no night, nothing unclean can enter. It is the home of the light. None could remain there but the sons of light. "Its lamp is the Lamb."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Hope Hidden in the Question

The question that silences Job also carries a promise. The God who never fails to bring a morning has one for him too.

This appeal to day and night is most effective. Shall Job accuse One who is Light, who sees all things as they are? Shall he doubt One who knows the secrets of his heart, and the reason for these chastenings? Do not these questions give a hint that God will cause Job's night to end, and at the appointed time cause His dayspring to visit the poor sufferer?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Whose morning — Job wanted his darkness to end, but he could not command a single sunrise; only God causes the dawn to know its place.

- What light does — daybreak changes nothing on the ground. It stamps the earth like a seal on clay, so everything stands out as it is.

- Why the wicked scatter — night covers murder, theft and crooked dealing. When light takes hold of the earth's far edges, the raised arm is broken.

- The larger dawn — the same pattern points ahead to a day when the Sun of righteousness rises, exposes evil and shakes the wicked out of the earth.

- The believer's answer — children of the day live by the light now. They are heading for a land where night never falls and the Lamb is its lamp.

Job 38:14 · Darby

It is changed like the signet-clay; and [all things] stand forth as in a garment

God's questions to Job move from the earth's foundations to something Job saw every morning: daybreak. Why point a suffering man to a sunrise, and what does a seal pressed into clay have to do with it?

The Setting: God's Questions About the Dawn

The verse sits inside a run of questions about day and night. God asks Job who commands them:

Has Job ever commanded a single morning to appear, or caused the dawn to know the place of its appearing? With all his supposed knowledge and power, man cannot command the forces of nature to do his bidding. Day by day the light appears in its appointed place. It floods the earth, and the guilty flee from it. Evening falls, and no word of man can stop or hurry this constant action. Only One gave His command at the beginning: "Let there be light." Since that time evening and morning have known their appointed time and place.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Picture: Clay Under the Seal

The image comes from ordinary business in the ancient world. A seal was a stone with a design cut into it, and it left its mark on soft clay:

Stones with words, letters, or symbols cut into them. In ancient times people pierced these stones and hung them from the arm or the neck by a cord or chain, or set them in rings and wore them on the finger. They pressed the design into pieces of clay attached to official documents. In the East such a document is not considered genuine unless it carries a seal.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

At night the earth is the blank clay. The dawn is the stamp:

"It is turned as clay to the seal." While the earth lies in darkness, you cannot make it out at all. It is like clay before the seal is pressed into it. But the moment the light shines, there you find its shape and its beauty as God fixed it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

(Kelly quotes an older translation of the phrase; the ESV reads, "It is changed like clay under the seal.")

The Second Image: Standing Out Like a Garment

The verse adds a second picture: clothing. What the light uncovers is not always lovely:

The signet-ring leaves its mark on formless clay. In the same way, the light stamps the varied forms and colours of all things on the face of the earth. They stand out like a lovely garment — or the reverse, a scene of ruin — under the light. The light shows all things as they are: "Anything that becomes visible is light" (Eph. 5:13). The night is the light of the wicked; they hate the light and will not come to it, in case their deeds should be exposed.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

(The older translation reads "whatsoever doth make manifest is light.")

The Wider Reach: A Morning Still to Come

Ridout reads this daybreak as a picture of a larger one. What sunrise does to those who work in the dark, God's own day will do to evil everywhere:

So the light of God's presence detects evil. When He causes a new day to dawn — "the day of the Lord" — evildoers will be shaken out of the earth. For this reason His people, who are "children of the light and of the day," order their life by the light. For this reason, in that fair land where there is no night, nothing that defiles can enter. It is the home of the light. None could remain there but the sons of light. "The Lamb is the light of it."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Point for Job Himself

These questions are aimed at a suffering man who had argued with God. Inside the challenge is a promise:

This appeal to day and night is most effective. Shall Job accuse One who is Light, who sees all things as they are? Shall he doubt One who knows the secrets of his heart, and the reason for these chastenings? Do not these questions hint that God will end Job's night, and at the appointed time send His dawn to visit the poor sufferer?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Whose morning — Job never commanded a single sunrise. God said, "Let there be light," and evening and morning have kept their appointed time and place ever since.

- Light stamps — the dark earth is blank clay. Daylight presses down like a seal, and shape and beauty appear as God fixed them.

- Light clothes — the same light brings out forms and colours like a garment. What it uncovers may be lovely, or a scene of ruin.

- Light exposes — this is why the wicked prefer night and will not come to the light: it shows all things as they are.

- Light dawns — a greater morning will shake evildoers out of the earth. The God who sends it can also end the night of a sufferer like Job.

Job 38:15 · Darby

And from the wicked their light is withholden, and the uplifted arm is broken.

God is questioning Job out of the storm about the daybreak — who commands the morning, and what it does when it comes. This verse is the last line of that picture: light is bad news for those who needed the dark, and the lifted arm is broken.

Darkness as the wicked man's working hours

The verse assumes the wicked have a light of their own, and it is not daylight. Ridout names what it is:

The night is the light of the wicked; they hate the light, and will not come to it, in case their deeds should be exposed. The coming of the light stops their deeds. Their uplifted arm is broken.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

This is not poetry alone. Kelly reads the dawn's shaking of the wicked as something anyone can observe about human behaviour at night:

Because the darkness of the night is exactly what gives the opportunity for murder and burglary and all the other dishonest dealings of men, more than any other time.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Light that exposes

Withholding the wicked man's light is not God adding a punishment from outside. It is what light does when it arrives. Light shows everything as it really is, beautiful or ruined.

A signet ring stamps its mark on shapeless clay. In the same way, the light stamps the varied forms and colours of all things on the face of the earth. Under that light they stand out like a lovely garment — or the opposite, a scene of ruin. The light shows all things as they are: "Anything that becomes visible is light" (Eph. 5:13).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The arm that was lifted

The second half of the verse pictures a raised arm. Grant reads it as the arm of opposition to God, and then applies it to Job himself, who had come near to doing the same thing:

Because the wicked love darkness, light is withheld from them (v.15). Their arm, lifted up in opposition to God, is simply broken. Job should certainly have been deeply impressed by this. He had been dangerously close to raising his arm against God, and in this way acting as the wicked do.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A dawn still to come

Ridout reads this daybreak as a picture of a larger morning still to come.

So the light of God's presence detects evil. When He causes a new day to dawn — "the day of the Lord" — evildoers will be shaken out of the earth. For this reason His people, who are "children of light, children of the day," order their lives by the light. For this reason, in that fair land where there is no night, nothing unclean can enter. It is the home of light. None could remain there but the sons of light. "Its lamp is the Lamb."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same light that ends Job's night

The picture cuts both ways. The God who brings morning to expose evil is the God who can bring morning to a suffering man.

This appeal to day and night is very effective. Will Job accuse One who is Light, who sees all things as they are? Will he doubt One who knows the secrets of his heart, and the reason for these chastenings? Do these questions not hint that God will bring Job's night to an end, and at the appointed time cause His dawn to visit the poor sufferer?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Night — Darkness is the only "light" the wicked have. They use it as cover, and Kelly notes that night is when crime happens.

- Dawn — Light does not debate evil. It exposes evil, stamping everything into view like a seal pressed into clay.

- Withheld — Losing that light is not an extra penalty. God simply removes the cover their deeds required.

- Broken — The arm raised against God is broken at daybreak. Grant applies this to Job, who had come close to raising his own.

- Morning — The same light that shakes out evildoers is the light that ends Job's night. God's people, children of the day, order their lives by it.

Job 38:16 · Darby

Hast thou entered as far as the springs of the sea? and hast thou walked in the recesses of the deep?

God answers Job out of the whirlwind. He does not explain Job's suffering. He asks questions instead — about the sea's hidden sources and an ocean floor no foot has walked. The point is not geography. It is the gap between what Job claimed to know and what he knows.

Where the Verse Sits

The questions of Job 38 are not a random list. One writer groups them in seven parts. This verse opens the fourth part, where God turns from the seen to the unseen:

We come now to these questions about God's creation. They give us a complete cycle of divine truth as shown in His works, grouped in seven parts. (1) The foundations of the earth (verses 4-7). (2) The bounds of the sea (verses 8-11). (3) Day and night (verses 12-15). (4) Unknown depths (verses 16-21). (5) The elements (verses 22-30). (6) The heavenly bodies (verses 31-33). (7) The clouds and their control (verses 34-38).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Secret Things

Having just spoken of light that exposes everything, God now asks about what stays hidden:

In close connection with the all-revealing power of the light, God probes Job further. Does he know secret things? — "which belong to God." The hidden depths of the sea with its countless dead; the gates of death and what lies beyond. Has Job searched this out?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Beneath the Surface

Job could see the surface of the sea and no more. One writer notes how much life that surface hides:

Now God asks Job if he had entered the springs of the sea or walked in search of the depths (v.16)… All the population of earth — human, animals, insects and birds — is nothing compared to the population of the seas. Life fills the seas in all areas and at every level. Job had no idea of what was unseen beneath the surface of the seas.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ignorance Before Judgment

Job had been passing verdicts on how God governs the world. The questions strip away his standing to do so:

The first thing God does is to overwhelm the man who pretended to sit in judgment on God's moral ways. He makes him feel his utter ignorance and powerlessness in the least things of divine power, even in creation… The man whose understanding stood baffled at such a question was in no position to judge His deep things… Had Job even visited the fountains of the sea, or gone to explore the secret of the great deep?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Aim of the Questions

Another writer states the purpose behind all these questions. He adds that time has not closed the gap:

These questions cover every department of what man calls the "natural sciences." They take in geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy, and more. Job had not a single answer to these questions and if he had spoken his words would have been folly. And we, 3000 years or more later, still cannot answer these questions in a satisfactory way. All our boasted progress and our scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature have not changed that… But what is the aim of the Lord in asking these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the needed true knowledge of himself and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Only Earthly Things

Everything God asks about here belongs to the visible world:

It is enough to show what God said to overwhelm Job in his self-confidence. His ignorance was so great and his powerlessness was evident. He lacked the wisdom to enter into even the outer works of God. And, after all, what was God speaking about? Earthly things… And Job is completely unable to answer one of these questions. In fact they are not answered to this day, for all the bragging of science. If that is the case about earthly things, what about the heavenly?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From Ocean Depths to God's Depths

One writer turns God's question back on the reader:

One of the questions God asked Job was, "Have you walked in the recesses of the deep?" I would ask myself and others this. Are we content with the outward side of Christianity? Or have the deep things of God gripped our hearts in power?… Are we content with only a surface knowledge of the things of God? Or do we know, in the power of the Spirit of God, the blessedness of the deep things of God that He has revealed to us?

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

The Result

The questioning is not cruelty; it works something in Job that argument never could:

But this message tests and humbles man. He who boasted in his righteousness, who seemed to consider his knowledge enough, is obliged to own his ignorance, weakness, and his unrighteousness. It is divinely done, and done so effectively that the lesson brings Job to his true place for all time.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Depth exposes. The verse opens God's section on "unknown depths." He turns from what light reveals to what stays hidden — the secret things that belong to Him alone.

- Depth unexplored. Job had never entered the sea's springs or walked its floor. A whole world of life lay under a surface he could only look at.

- Depth disqualifies. A man baffled by the ocean was in no position to sit in judgment on God's moral ways.

- Depth humbles. The aim was not information but to bring Job to a true knowledge of himself and free him from the pride of his heart.

- Depth invites. These were only earthly things. The same question still presses. Are we content with surface Christianity, or have we entered the deep things of God?

Job 38:17 · Darby

Have the gates of death been revealed unto thee? and hast thou seen the gates of the shadow of death?

God's questioning of Job moves down from the springs of the sea to the one place no living person has ever explored — the realm of the dead. This is not a riddle about geography. Job has been arguing about God's ways, so God asks him one thing: does he know where death takes people?

What the Gates Are

Where the ESV has "the gates of deep darkness," older translations read "the shadow of death." One commentator explains what lies behind those gates:

Now He goes down lower still. Sheol, or Hades, as we have it — that is, the place where departed spirits are kept — is pictured here as the heart of the earth, and it may in fact be so. It is not the same thing as the lake of fire. But here we have a prison for those who have died.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Force of the Question

Another writer weighs the question against all the dead the world has already swallowed:

Had the gates of death been opened to him? (v.17). Of course the seas have swallowed countless millions of people, including those drowned in the flood of Noah's day. But apart from this, did Job understand where death had taken all those it had claimed through the years?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God Asks

God's questions come in a long chain. One commentator explains what they were doing to Job:

The first thing God does is to overwhelm him. This man claimed to sit in judgment on God's moral ways. So God fills him with a sense of his utter ignorance and helplessness before the least works of divine power, even in creation… A man whose understanding was baffled by such a question was in no position to judge God's deep things… Had the gates of death been revealed to him?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer names the aim behind the whole series:

What is the aim of the Lord in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the needed true knowledge of himself and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Still Addressed to Us

One commentator ties this question to the "secret things" that belong to God, and puts it to readers now:

Does he know the secret things — those "which belong to God"? The hidden depths of the sea with its countless dead; the gates of death and what lies beyond. Has Job searched this out?… Does modern science truly know it?… Jehovah addresses these questions not only to Job, whose knowledge was limited to his own time, but to people today.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same writer points to where the answers lie:

What is the key to all these questions? It is God, the true knowledge of Himself. Knowing Him, we know the Author and Source of all knowledge. Leave Him out, and the sum of all science is a blank wall, with the hidden truth still lying beyond it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the Questions Produced in Job

The questions had an effect. Job answered God twice:

Job had dared to sit in judgment on Jehovah and His ways. So God tests whether he is fit for it: what does he know? What can he do?… Job's two answers show the effect. In the first, he humbles himself and lays his hand on his mouth. In the second, he fully confesses his sinful pride and hates what he is. This prepares the way for his outward recovery and return to prosperity.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Gates Finally Opened

No man could answer God's question — but One has since passed through those gates and come back:

In no other way could the gates of death be opened for us than by His resurrection from the dead. He has opened them, and He holds their keys, as the One who lives forever. To all who put their faith in Him He says, "Fear not, I am the first and the last, and the living one. I died, and behold I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of Death and Hades" (Rev. 1:17-18). He is Master of death and the grave… He has flooded the darkness of death with the light of hope.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Gates. The question points to Sheol, where departed spirits are kept. It is a prison for the dead, and it is not the lake of fire.

- Locked. Job had never been through them. He could speak about death, but he did not know where death had taken the millions it had claimed.

- Purpose. God asks what Job cannot answer. The aim is to humble a man who sat in judgment on His ways and to free him from the pride of his heart.

- Ours. The questions still stand. They reach people today, and without the knowledge of God all our science ends at a blank wall.

- Opened. Job laid his hand on his mouth. We have the answer he never got: Christ has opened the gates of death by rising, and He holds the keys of Death and Hades.

Job 38:18 · Darby

Hath thine understanding compassed the breadths of the earth? Declare if thou knowest it all.

God is questioning Job out of the storm, and now He turns from hidden things to something Job could see — the earth's own expanse. The question tests whether Job, who had argued about God's ways, can measure even the ground under his feet.

Placing the Question

The sequence of questions moves from what lies hidden to what lies open, and Job fails at both.

Now He comes up to the surface. "Have you perceived the breadth of the earth?" What do you know about it? "Declare if you know it all."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "Comprehended" Asks

Measuring a thing is not the same as taking it in. The question still stands after every advance in knowledge.

"Have you comprehended the expanse of the earth? Declare, if you know all this" (v.18). In Job's day he surely did not know that the earth was formed as a huge ball turning in space. Even today we are told the earth is 25,000 miles around. Who can grasp how great that is? Scientists have learned a great deal about God's creation. Yet the more they learn, the clearer it becomes that their ignorance is far greater than their knowledge.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Addressed To Every Generation

The question did not stop with Job. It reaches the reader with the same force.

Does he know secret things? — "which belong to God." … Has he fully known the expanse of the earth — all that it contains? Does modern science really know it? … The Lord asks these questions not only of Job, whose knowledge was limited to his own day, but of people today.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Asks At All

God's question is not after information. It aims at the man who cannot answer it.

Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken his words would have been folly. … But what is the aim of the Lord in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man, and to humble man. It was to bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needed, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Great Things And Small Alike

God does not only humble Job with what is vast. He points to the smallest things He has made, and the effect is the same.

So it is clear that God is bringing all Job's proud talk to nothing. But He is not satisfied with showing how small man is by what is vast. He also takes up things we might think are small by comparison. … So it makes little difference whether we look at the greatest of God's works or at the least. Everywhere we meet something completely beyond the reach of man. … Job had even claimed to judge the moral depths of God. Yet he could not face, and had no real idea of, what God is in the smallest part of His universe.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From Earth To Eternity

Everything God names here belongs to the visible world. That limit is part of the argument.

It is enough to show what God said to overwhelm Job's self-confidence. His ignorance was great. His powerlessness was plain. He lacked the wisdom to enter even the outer works of God. And, after all, what was God speaking about? Earthly things. … Job cannot answer even one of these questions. In fact no one has answered them to this day, for all the boasting of science. If that is how it stands with earthly things, what about the heavenly? What about the eternal things? There we depend on God completely. We know nothing but what He tells us, and this is all our blessing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where The Answers Begin

These questions do have a key, and it is not found by measuring.

What after all is human knowledge but a knowledge, as Socrates said, of our ignorance? … What is the key to all these questions? It is God, the true knowledge of Himself. Knowing Him, we know the Author and Source of all knowledge. Leave Him out of account, and the sum of all science is a blank wall, beyond which the hidden truth still lies.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — God asks Job about the ground under his feet: has he taken in the whole expanse of the earth?

- Ignorance — Job had no answer, and neither has anyone since. The more we learn about creation, the plainer our ignorance becomes.

- Everyone — These questions are not only Job's. They reach people today with the same force, because secret things belong to God.

- Humbling — Their aim is the man, not the facts: to show God greater than man, and to free Job from the pride of his heart.

- Dependence — If earthly things defeat us, heavenly and eternal things leave us wholly dependent on God. Knowing Him is where all real knowledge starts.

Job 38:19 · Darby

Where is the way to where light dwelleth? and the darkness, where is its place,

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Job 38:20 · Darby

That thou shouldest take it to its bound, and that thou shouldest know the paths to its house?

God keeps questioning Job, and this question treats light and darkness as if each had a home of its own. Could Job lead them back there? The point is not science but authority. A man who cannot lead the daylight home cannot judge how God treats a sufferer.

Light and darkness pictured as having a home

The verse pictures two places, each with a road leading to it. One commentator renders the lines this way:

What is the way the light dwells, and darkness, where is its place, that you might bring it to its boundary, and that you might know the path to its house? You know! for you were then born, and the number of your days is great.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That is this writer's own translation of verses 19–21; the ESV speaks of taking it "to its territory" and discerning "the paths to its home."

A question that would never have occurred to a man

God is not asking Job for information.

Could Job take the light or the darkness back to its original place of dwelling? (v.20). The very question would not have arisen in men's minds, but God raises it simply to show how greatly man's knowledge is limited. The irony of verse 21 is striking. Was Job born when light first appeared? Had he lived so many years? Of course God means these words only to put Job in his place.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Still unanswered today

Job was not the last person stuck for an answer.

What is the "home," or origin of light, or of darkness? Men have been asking about "the origin of evil." What do they know apart from divine revelation? In recent years modern science has seen more clearly that the sun is not the origin of light. Light exists apart from the sun and apart from any other visible source. Jehovah addresses these questions not only to Job, whose knowledge was limited to his own time, but to people today.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer moves from the puzzle of light in nature to the One behind it.

In Job 38 God asked Job two questions, "Where is the way to where light dwells?" (v. 19) and "By what way is the light parted?" (v. 24). Where does light come from and what is its nature? These are natural things, things we see in nature, and they are almost impossible to explain. How much more is this true of Him who is the source of all light?

Modernised from Arend RemmersOriginal wording

Why God asks instead of explaining

God's questions here cover every field of knowledge. They have one aim.

What questions these are. They cover every field of what man calls "natural sciences" — geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy, and so on. Job had not a single answer to these questions. If he had spoken, his words would have been folly… But what is the Lord's aim in asking them? To show that God is greater than man, and to humble man. It is to bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needs, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

From the smallest things to the deepest ways

Here is the logic of the whole speech. God shows Job only the edge of His power, and Job already has no answer.

Jehovah only touches the edges of His power, the outer region of His glory. Yet what had man to say? What could Job answer? Not a word… And did the man who could not explain God's smallest works dare to judge the deepest part of His ways and plans? For is anything so deep as His purposes, His affections, and His ways with the saints He loves? And all this while they are weak and face a mighty, cunning enemy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Mercy hidden inside the challenge

These questions are not only crushing. One writer finds a hint of hope in them.

Shall Job accuse One who is Light, who sees all things as they are? Shall he doubt One who knows the secrets of his heart, and the reason for this discipline? Do not these questions give a hint that God will cause Job's night to end, and at the appointed time cause His dawn to visit the poor sufferer?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — Can Job lead light and darkness home to their own borders? The question is there to show how little a man knows.

- Ignorance — Where light comes from was beyond Job. Writers say it is still beyond us, so the question reaches readers today.

- Irony — God adds that Job must know, since he was born back then. The line puts Job in his place.

- Purpose — God asks all this to humble man, to give Job a true knowledge of himself, and to free him from pride.

- Argument — God stays with His smallest works. A man who cannot explain those cannot judge His deepest dealings with those He loves.

Job 38:21 · Darby

Thou knowest, for thou wast then born, and the number of thy days is great!

God has just asked Job where light and darkness live. Now He adds a line about Job's own age, as if Job had been alive when light began.

Question or irony

Some versions render the line as a question. Others read it as irony. One writer says the choice does not change what God is saying:

In close connection with the all-revealing power of the light, God probes Job further. Does he know secret things? — "which belong to God." What is the "home," or origin, of light, or of darkness? Whether we regard verse 21 as a question, as in our version, or as a statement in divine irony — "You know it, for then you were born" — the meaning is obvious.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Job is being asked about

The subject just before this verse is where light and darkness come from. That is not a settled matter even now:

"Where is the way to the dwelling of light, and where is the place of darkness?" (v.19). God had said, "Let there be light" on the first day of the remaking of the earth (Gen. 1:3), before the sun was set in its place on the fourth day. Some scientists thought the sun was the source of light. Further study has convinced them that light exists apart from the sun. Where does it come from? We do not know any more about this than Job did. So the origin of light and the origin of darkness are matters of which mankind is totally ignorant.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The sting in "the number of your days"

The irony points at Job's own years:

Could Job take the light or the darkness back to its original place of dwelling? (v.20). The very question would not have arisen in men's minds. God raises it only to show how limited man's knowledge is. The irony of verse 21 is striking. Was Job born when light was introduced? Had he lived so many years? Of course these words of God are simply intended to put Job in his place.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Still unanswered today

These questions were not aimed only at a man of the ancient world. The same paper lies open in front of every generation:

And yet let not modern science claim the ability to answer where Job could not. Outward knowledge has advanced. Men have discovered great laws and principles of nature. But can today's scientist give truer and more satisfying replies to these questions from God than Job could? What, after all, is human knowledge but a knowledge, as Socrates said, of our ignorance? What is the key to all these questions? It is God, the true knowledge of Himself. Knowing Him, we know the Author and Source of all knowledge. Leave Him out of account, and the sum of all science is a blank wall, beyond which the hidden truth still lies.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God asks at all

God has an aim in all this questioning, and it concerns Job himself:

What questions these are. They cover every department of what man calls "natural sciences" — geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy. Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken, his words would have been folly. But what is the Lord's aim in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the needed true knowledge of himself and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

From light and darkness to the unseen

Everything God has raised so far is visible and earthly. That is the force of the argument:

And after all, what was God speaking about? Earthly things. Every one of these things is merely natural, and has to do with what is visible, what is seen and temporal. And Job is completely unable to answer even one of these questions. In fact they are not answered to this day, for all the boasting of science. If that is the case about earthly things, what about the heavenly? What about the eternal things? There we are entirely and absolutely dependent upon God. We know nothing but what He tells us, and this is all our blessing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Ignorance. Question or irony, the verse lands the same way. Job cannot say where light lives. He was not there when it began.

- Ignorance still. The origin of light and darkness is still beyond us. New discoveries mainly show us how little we know.

- Ignorance humbled. God's aim is not to crush Job but to break his pride and bring him to true knowledge of himself.

- Ignorance answered. The key to every one of these questions is God Himself; leave Him out and all knowledge ends at a blank wall.

- Ignorance turned to trust. If the visible world defeats us, we can only take the eternal world from God's hand. That dependence is our blessing.

Job 38:22 · Darby

Hast thou entered into the storehouses of the snow, and hast thou seen the treasuries of the hail,

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Job 38:23 · Darby

Which I have reserved for the time of distress, for the day of battle and war?

God answers Job with a string of questions he cannot answer. Here they turn to the weather — and to a store God keeps back for a day He has already named.

Storehouses in God's Hand

So where is this store kept? One writer asks that, and he will not stop at the answer science gives.

The snow and hail are laid up in storehouses — where? They are not in some hidden place, in vast masses. They are not merely in the invisible vapour filling the sky, as science would now say. Behind all that, those storehouses of mercy and of judgment are in the hand of God. His word produces them — the snow, for protection of the grass in winter, and for cooling and refreshing in summer; the hail, in smiting plagues and sweeping judgments (Isa. 28:17). Snow, we are told, forms when cold acts on vapour and turns its molecules into crystals of lovely and varied shape. Who planned those shapes? Whose laws do these tiny crystals obey?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Same Substance, Opposite Errands

Snow and hail are both frozen water, yet God gives each different work.

In the snow there are treasures Job knew nothing about, and the same is true of the hail. While the snow may be for protection, the hail is reserved for times of trouble, battle and war. Both snow and hail are frozen water, but how different they are when falling on earth!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Reserved, Not Yet Spent

The verse does not say God has spent the hail. He keeps it in reserve. That turns a weather question into a warning about what is still to come.

So the wrath of God rests upon the world, held back indeed by His patient love, which at the same time has provided a place of refuge. But still there are "the storehouses of the hail" which He has "reserved for the time of trouble, for the day of battle and war." And they will be poured out yet, while the heavens proclaim His righteousness in it. What makes it so terrible is this: it is the action of righteousness. Faith looks ahead to it, and takes it home now as something that governs one's thoughts and conduct.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Opened Before

God asked Job about a store he had never seen. Yet Scripture records times when God opened it on His enemies.

And He shows that God has a store that man knows nothing about. God makes it act whenever He pleases… Look at the case of the Amorites, who, on the road to Beth-horon, fell by the hailstones that God rained upon them. And, again, in other cases He rained fire and brimstone on the cities of the plain.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Whiteness Holds

If the hail's treasure is stored wrath, the snow's treasure runs the other way. One writer reads its whiteness as a picture of what God has ready for sinners now.

Next to its coldness, and perhaps more striking than that, snow is the standard for absolute whiteness, for purity… But what "treasures" of whiteness does God reserve? He is light. The snow reflects the sunlight, and that suggests how fully His essential righteousness shines out in the work of redemption — the work that lets Him say: "though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow" (Isa. 1:18). Sins that once cried for vengeance now reflect the glory of God's character, through the precious blood of Christ!… In the "redemption that is in Christ Jesus," He has endless stores of whiteness and protection for the sins of the world. What fearful judgments will follow the rejection of that grace!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Asks at All

Why ask a man questions he cannot possibly answer?

Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken, his words would have been folly. And we live 3000 years or more later, with all our boasted progress and our scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature. We are still unable to answer these questions in a satisfying way… But what is the Lord's aim in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the needed true knowledge of himself and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Stored — Snow and hail are not loose forces of nature. They are kept supplies, and the storehouse is in God's hand. His word opens it.

- Sorted — The same frozen water goes out on two errands. Snow covers and protects. Hail waits for the day of battle and war.

- Reserved — God's wrath still rests on the world. His patience holds it back, and He has provided a place of refuge.

- Released — God has opened that store before — on the Amorites at Beth-horon, and on the cities of the plain. He will open it again. Righteousness is what makes it so terrible.

- Received — God's other treasure is open now. He has endless stores of whiteness, so scarlet sins become white as snow. Refuse that grace, and only the hail is left.

Job 38:24 · Darby

By what way is the light parted, [and] the east wind scattered upon the earth?

God answers Job out of the storm with questions, not with an explanation of his suffering. Job has argued about how God governs a sufferer; now God asks him to account for a sunrise and a gust of desert air.

Why the Question Is Asked

These questions have a purpose, and it is not to teach Job science:

What questions these are. They cover every department of what man calls "natural sciences" — geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy. Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken his words would have been folly. And we, three thousand years later, with all our boasted progress and our discoveries of the great laws of nature, still cannot answer them in any satisfactory way... But what is the Lord's aim in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man. To bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needed, and to set him free from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Ordinary Things, Not Only Vast Ones

God's questions do not stop at what is huge and far away. They come down to small things too:

God is here bringing to nothing all the proud talk of Job. But He is not satisfied with showing man's littleness by what is vast. He takes up what we might think of as comparatively small things... It matters little whether we look at the greatest or at the least of the works of God. Everywhere we meet what is entirely beyond the reach of man's mind... Job had even presumed to judge God's moral dealings. But he could not face what God is in the least part of His universe. He had not the slightest adequate idea of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Parting of the Light

The first half of the verse asks how light is parted and shared out. One writer follows that reach, then asks what it can and cannot teach us:

How amazing are the "partings" of the light — reaching every part of the earth where its rays fall. How unimaginably swift are "the wings of the morning," flashing from sun to earth in a few moments. How beautiful those "partings" are in the spectrum, where the rainbow paints the whole landscape in living colours. Why and how is one object green, another blue, another red?... Science has much to tell us that might well fill us with wonder and amazement, and with awe and worship — of Whom? The more we know only of His displays, the less we really know of Himself. We know Him only as He makes Himself known in Christ.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Light and East Wind in One Breath

The verse sets light beside the east wind. That pairing carries the lesson Job needed:

Man likes to think he is in control of things. But can he control the snow, the hail, or the wind? Verse 24 inserts the matter of the way in which light is diffused before speaking of the east wind. For Job had to realise that the light of God was at work in all His actions. It was at work just as surely when He sent His east wind of strong adversity. God's ways had really been darkness to Job, so he did not understand the way God was diffusing His light.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The East Wind in His Fists

The east wind rises in the same quarter as the dawn. It does not arrive like the dawn:

From the east, the apparent source of the light, comes also the sweeping east wind, spread over the land in the storm. It is a picture of wrath — the wrath of Him who in the light had spoken so quietly. But even the east wind is held in His fists, controlled by His will.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That image runs the same way through Scripture:

The east wind was destructive to plants and dangerous to ships at sea. It is a symbol of the withering power of God's judgments.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What Comes After the Storm

The verses that follow move from wind to rain. That order holds hope for Job:

But storms and storm-clouds are only the prelude to the rain. Here too God is seen, bringing refreshment after the storm. So with Job — his chastening will be followed by the showers. Who knows how to "divide," to distribute, these refreshing showers? Man would distribute them unevenly, or at the wrong time. God knows when and how to send the welcome relief.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — God does not defend Himself to Job. He asks him to trace light and wind back to their source, to humble him and bring him to true knowledge of himself.

- Small — God points not only to the vast heavens but to the least part of His universe. There too man is at a loss.

- Light — the parting of light reaches everywhere and is beautiful beyond explaining. But knowing what God displays is not knowing God. He makes Himself known in Christ.

- Wind — the east wind blows from the same east as the dawn. It pictures wrath, and God holds it "in His fists, controlled by His will."

- Rain — the storm is only the prelude. God alone knows when and how to send the showers, and showers follow Job's chastening.

Job 38:25 · Darby

Who hath divided a channel for the rain-flood, and a way for the thunder's flash;

God answers Job out of the storm, and His questions turn to the weather. Who cut the channel for the rain? Who marked out the road the thunderbolt travels? Job had been judging how God runs the world. Now God asks whether he understands even the rain.

The Question Behind the Question

These questions are not a nature lesson for its own sake. God aims them at a man who had set himself up to judge God's dealings.

The first thing done is to overwhelm him. This is the man who claimed the right to sit in judgment on God's moral ways. He is made to feel his utter ignorance and powerlessness in the smallest things of divine power, even in creation. Where was Job when Jehovah founded the earth? What did he know of its fixed measure, or of the line stretched out on it... The man whose understanding was baffled by such a question was in no position to judge God's deep things.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Dividing the Waters

An older translation reads, "who has divided a watercourse for the overflowing of waters." To divide here means to portion out. God does not dump the rain. He hands it out in the right measure, at the right moment.

Storms and storm clouds are only the opening act before the rain. Here, too, we see God bringing refreshment after the storm. So it is with Job: after his chastening will come the showers. Who knows how to "divide," to distribute, these refreshing showers? Man would hand them out unevenly, or at the wrong time. God knows when and how to send the welcome relief.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Way for the Thunderbolt

The verse ties lightning and rain together. One writer tells of a man who startled his questioners by pulling out a pocket Bible and reading them these lines:

"When He made a decree for the rain, and a way for the lightning of the thunder" (Job 28:26); "He causes the vapours to ascend [evaporation, or forming of clouds] from the ends of the earth; He makes lightnings for the rain" (Psalm 135:7)... His audience was much impressed. They might well be so.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

These verses are quoted from an older translation. Ridout puts it the other way round: the storm is what carries the rain. "The lightning and thunder are only the vehicles on which the showers come, as Science now declares."

Rain Where No One Lives

The question runs on into the next line: the rain falls on land where no one lives. That clause undoes the idea that creation exists to serve us.

Well, God does think of animals, He thinks of even the insect; He thinks of where no man is; there He has His thoughts and His plans and His goodness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer draws out the moral edge. If God waters empty ground, then measuring His work by what it does for us is pride:

But God's work is not limited to human needs, little as we may understand these things. Our merely human thoughts circle around ourselves, and that is nothing but improper pride. God's thoughts are infinitely higher than we naturally imagine (Isa. 55:8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the Study Should End

Knowing the mechanism does not answer the question God asked. Explanations of how storms work are a starting point, not a stopping point.

Let Science tell us all it can discover about the laws and effects of snow crystals, about the changing temperature of air currents, about electric discharges and equalizations. Let us go as deep as we can into these second causes. We shall still find them to be only the outer court of His tabernacle, the display of His attributes. They lead us on into the holiest place of all: His revealed Person, as seen in Christ Jesus.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Who. Every clause is a "who" question, put to a man who had judged God's ways. The aim is to leave him feeling his "utter ignorance and powerlessness in the smallest things of divine power."

- Divided. The channel is cut and the water is portioned out. Man "would hand them out unevenly, or at the wrong time." God "knows when and how to send the welcome relief."

- Way. Even the lightning has a set road, and the verse ties that road to rain — a link the Bible states long before science could explain it.

- Where no man is. Rain falls on empty land, because "God's work is not limited to human needs." His thoughts reach animals, insects, and ground no one will ever see.

- Beyond. Second causes are only the outer court. They lead on to "His revealed Person, as seen in Christ Jesus" — where Job's storm-questions were driving all along.

Job 38:26 · Darby

To cause it to rain on the earth, where no one is; on the wilderness wherein there is not a man;

God is questioning Job out of the storm, and here the questions turn to rain that falls where nobody lives. Why would God water ground that no one will ever walk on? And what does that say to a man who fears God has stopped caring about him?

The Voice behind the questions

These questions are not a lecture on weather. One writer points out that what changed Job was the speaker, not the subject matter:

The voice that came to Job out of the whirlwind brought him into God's presence. Until now he had been greatly ignorant of His character. He had said many excellent things about God, but he had never before known His actual presence. This, we will find, is the key to the amazing change worked in Job.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Rain where no one is watching

So who is the rain for, if not for people? One writer answers:

God does think of animals. He thinks even of the insect. He thinks of where no man is. There He has His thoughts and His plans and His goodness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Wider than human needs

If rain falls where it helps nobody, God's work is wider than human needs. That exposes something in the way we think:

Sometimes the rain causes overflowing floods. Sometimes this happens where nobody lives at all. Sometimes it happens where it badly affects the people living there. But God's work is not confined to the needs of humans, little as we may understand these things. Our merely human thoughts centre around ourselves, which is only unseemly pride. God's thoughts are infinitely higher than we naturally imagine.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Grant points to Isaiah, where God says: "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the LORD" (Isaiah 55:8, ESV).

Who decides where the showers fall

The verse assumes Someone decides where the water goes, and when. One writer sees in that a word for Job himself:

But storms and storm-clouds are only the prelude to the rain. Here too we see God bringing refreshing after the storm. So with Job, the showers will follow his chastening. Who knows how to "divide," to distribute, these refreshing showers? Man would distribute them unevenly, or at the wrong time. God knows when and how to send the welcome relief.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Mercy that reaches the smallest thing

Rain on empty land is not waste. It reaches the places no one owns, and the life no one counts:

This rain is spread so widely. It reaches beyond the places where people live, out to the waste places of the earth. Wherever the tiniest blade of grass grows, there you see the truth that "His mercy is over all that He has made."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Note: Ridout quotes the older wording, "His tender mercies are over all His works" (Psalm 145:9).

The comfort hidden in the question

Job's fear that God had overlooked him meets its answer in God's care for every creature:

Had Job been thinking that God did not consider his welfare? Was there any creature, small or mighty, that Jehovah did not care for — the leviathan of the flood waters, or the sparrow on the housetop? He cared for every creature of His in its need. Would God not care for Job too, the highest creature on earth, who also had a life beyond the grave?

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Summary

- Voice. What broke Job was not new facts about weather but meeting God Himself. He had spoken well about God without ever knowing His presence.

- Reach. Rain falls where no person lives. God's thoughts, plans and goodness reach places where no one is watching.

- Measure. We would spread the showers unevenly and at the wrong time. God alone knows when and where to send relief, and the storm is only the prelude to it.

- Mercy. Wherever the smallest blade of grass grows in the waste places, His mercy is over all that He has made.

- Trust. He cares for every creature in its need. So He has not stopped caring for the sufferer who feels forgotten.

Job 38:27 · Darby

To satisfy the desolate and waste [ground], and to cause the sprout of the grass to spring forth?

God answers Job out of a whirlwind, and He answers with questions. One question asks why rain falls on empty land where nobody lives — and what that says to a suffering man who has been arguing with God.

Rain where no one lives

The verse sits in a run of questions about water: channels, thunderbolts, and rain on empty land. One writer draws out that God's attention does not stop where human settlement stops:

God does think of animals, He thinks of even the insect; He thinks of where no man is; there He has His thoughts and His plans and His goodness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Waste ground that gets satisfied

The words "waste and desolate" describe land written off as useless. Yet rain reaches it, and the smallest result carries a witness:

How widely distributed is this rain, reaching out beyond the homes of man, to the waste places of the earth. Wherever the tiniest blade of grass grows, we see the truth that "His tender mercies are over all His works."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Man is not the measuring stick

If rain is only for crops and cities, then rain on an empty desert looks like waste. One writer says that complaint exposes us, not God:

Sometimes the rain causes overflowing floods. Sometimes it falls where no one lives at all. Sometimes it falls where the people living there feel its effects deeply. But God's work is not confined to the needs of humans, little as we may understand these things. Our mere human thoughts centre on ourselves, which is only improper pride. God's thoughts are infinitely higher than we naturally imagine (Isa. 55:8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Not mechanics, but family

We can explain weather as a chain of causes. One writer uses the language of family instead:

Nor are these things merely acts; they are, so to speak, the offspring of God's love and care. Rain and dew, ice and frost, are all the children of the great and good God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Studying the process does not lead away from God. The closer we trace it, the further in it takes us:

Let science tell us all it can discover of the laws and effects of the snow crystals, of the changing temperature of the air currents, and of electric discharges and how they even out. Let us go as deep as we can into these second causes. We shall find that they are the outer court of His tabernacle, the display of His attributes. They lead us on into the holiest place, His revealed Person, as seen in Christ Jesus.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The showers come after the storm

Storms come first, then rain, then green shoots. One writer reads that order as a word to Job:

But storms and storm-clouds are only the prelude to the rain. Here, too, we see God bringing refreshing after the storm. So with Job: the showers will follow his chastening. Who knows how to "divide," to distribute, these refreshing showers? Man would distribute them unevenly, or at the wrong time. God knows when and how to send the welcome relief.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God asks instead of explains

God never tells Job why he suffered. He asks questions instead, and Job cannot answer one of them:

Job had not a single answer to these questions. If he had spoken, his words would have been folly. And we live 3000 years or more later, with all our boasted progress and scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature. We are still unable to answer these questions in a satisfactory way… But what is the Lord's aim in asking these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man. To bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needed, and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Reach. The rain goes past the last house on the map. Where no man is, God still has His thoughts, His plans and His goodness.

- Waste. God satisfies the ground everyone else has given up on. One blade of grass there proves His tender mercies are over all His works.

- Pride. Ask why God waters an empty desert, and you are measuring His work by our use of it. Such thoughts centre on ourselves.

- Fatherhood. Rain, dew, ice and frost are not bare events. They are the children of the great and good God, and the laws behind them are only His outer court.

- Timing. Showers follow Job's storm. Man would send relief unevenly or too late; God knows when and how. The questions that silence Job free him from the pride of his heart.

Job 38:28 · Darby

Hath the rain a father? or who begetteth the drops of dew?

God answers Job with a question about the weather instead of an explanation. He pictures rain and dew as children with a father, and asks Job to name him.

Questions, not a lecture

God's reply to Job is surprising for the language it uses.

These words are not so much a revelation of truth as a question. They ask Job whether he knows the truths that lie all around him in God's vast creation. It is this which makes these words of Jehovah so wonderful. He does not speak "in a tongue no man can understand." He speaks in the language of nature — about the earth, the sky, the clouds and rain, and animals and birds.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God asks

The questions are unanswerable on purpose. They are not set to inform Job but to take something out of him.

What questions these are. They cover every branch of what people call "natural sciences" — geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy, and so on. Job had no answer to a single one of them, and if he had spoken his words would have been foolish. Even now, with all our boasted progress and our scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature, we are still unable to answer these questions in a satisfying way... But what is the aim of the Lord in putting these questions? It is to show that God is greater than man and to humble man. It is to bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needs, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Rain and dew are God's offspring

The word "father" in the verse is not decoration. Ridout presses what it implies about rain and dew.

These things are not merely acts; they are, so to speak, the offspring of God's love and care. Rain and dew, ice and frost, are all the children of the great and good God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The scale of that fathering runs right down to the single drop.

Jehovah said to His servant Job, "Has the rain a father?" as if to show that the mighty God fathers even a drop of rain. Millions of tons of water rise from the oceans each day by evaporation. The clouds hold it as vapour until the ruler of nature needs it to water His garden.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

Nothing falls at random

Weather looks like one of the most random things in the world. The verse aims straight at that impression.

Where and when the rain falls may seem to us completely random, but it depends simply on the will of our God and Father, who never makes a mistake.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

How God makes a drop of dew

So how does God beget a single drop of dew? One writer follows the cooling that makes it.

As air cools it can hold less water. The point where the air can hold no more has a name — the "dew point." When the cooling air reaches the dew point, the extra water vapour in the air condenses and forms dew. Dew will form on anything that is cool enough compared with the air around it... This is a very gentle and delicate process, and is the way God "begets each drop of the dew."

Modernised from L. A. StasselOriginal wording

Care beyond human need

We tend to measure God's works by what they do for us. Grant names that instinct for what it is.

Sometimes the rain causes overflowing floods, sometimes even where no one lives, and sometimes where the people are greatly affected by it. But God's work is not confined to the needs of humans, little as we may understand these things. Our merely human thoughts centre on ourselves, and that is nothing but improper pride. God's thoughts are infinitely higher than anything we imagine on our own (Isa. 55:8-9).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the explanations lead

Modern science can describe condensation, temperature and cloud physics. Ridout does not treat that as a rival answer, but as a doorway.

Let science tell us all it can discover about the laws and effects of snow crystals, about the changing temperature of air currents, about electric charges and how they even out. Let us go as deep as we can into these secondary causes. We will find that they are the outer court of His tabernacle, the display of His attributes. They lead us on into the holiest place of all, His revealed Person, as seen in Christ Jesus.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Father. The verse names God as the parent of rain and dew. They are His children, born of His love and care.

- Fathered. He fathers even a single raindrop, and He begets each drop of dew in a gentle, delicate process.

- Faultless. What looks random to us follows the will of a God and Father who never makes a mistake.

- Far-reaching. His work is not limited to human needs. Rain falls where no one lives, and our self-centred picture of His purposes is only pride.

- Floored. God asks these questions to humble Job and bring him to true knowledge of himself. The study of nature's causes leads on to God Himself, revealed in Christ Jesus.

Job 38:29 · Darby

Out of whose womb cometh the ice? and the hoary frost of heaven, who bringeth it forth?

God's questions to Job move from the sea and the dawn to small, everyday things — rain, dew, ice and frost. He asks about each one in the language of birth, and the question presses a man who has been arguing with God to admit how little he knows.

What the Question Actually Asks

The verse sits inside a short run about weather, and each line asks after a parent for something no one has ever seen born. One writer takes the three verses together and shows how ordinary they look until you try to answer them:

"Has the rain a father? Or who has begotten the drops of dew?" (v.28). Where and when the rain falls may seem to us completely random, but it depends simply on the will of our God and Father, who never makes a mistake. In the same way, frost is always sent by Him in perfect wisdom for every occasion (v.29). How it is possible for water to harden like stone is only explained by God's law in sending the cold (v.30). Who really understands this?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Scripture Supplies the Answer

Job has no answer, but Scripture does. A Bible dictionary traces the word for ice to the psalm that answers God's question:

Frozen water or snow. God demanded of Job, "From whose womb did the ice come forth, and who has given birth to the frost of heaven?" It is answered in the Psalms: it is God who "hurls down His crystals of ice like crumbs; who can stand before His cold?" Job 6:16; Job 38:29; Ps. 147:17.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Not Bare Force, But Fatherly Care

The birth language is not accidental. It says something warmer than raw power:

Nor are these things merely acts; they are, so to speak, the offspring of God's love and care. Rain and dew, ice and frost, are all the children of the great and good God. "These are Your works, Parent of all good!"

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Asks at All

These are not riddles for their own sake. One writer reads the whole series as aimed at one result in Job:

They cover every department of what man calls "natural sciences." These include geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy, and so on. Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken his words would have been folly. And we live 3000 years or more later. With all our boasted progress and our scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature, we are still unable to answer these questions in a satisfying way. All the boastings of science about getting at the secrets of creation are nothing but foam. One breath of the Almighty scatters man's speculations to the winds, when they are made apart from Him and His Word. But what is the Lord's aim in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the needed true knowledge of himself and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Explaining the Mechanism Is Not Answering the Question

We can now describe how water freezes and how frost forms. That knowledge does not retire the verse, because the question was never about mechanism:

Let science tell us all it can discover of the laws and effects of the snow crystals, of the changing temperature of the air currents, of electric charges building up and evening out. Let us go as deeply as we can into these secondary causes. We shall find them to be the outer court of His tabernacle, the display of His attributes. They lead us on into the holiest place, into His revealed Person, as seen in Christ Jesus.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Effect It Should Have on Us

Admitting ignorance is only half the lesson. The other half is what a believer does next:

What is the effect, then, on a godly man who really believes in Him and His guidance? What is the effect of knowing our ignorance to be so immense? Reliance upon God. That was the great thing in which Job failed, murmured and found fault. He could not understand it. He might have believed and ought to have believed, and that is where we fail too, for we are quite as ready to reason and murmur as Job.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- His question — God asks who fathered the ice and frost. No creature can claim them; nobody has ever watched them born.

- His answer — Scripture gives what Job could not. God Himself hurls down the ice, and no one can stand before His cold.

- His children — the birth image is deliberate. Rain, dew, ice and frost are the offspring of God's love and care, not just displays of strength.

- His purpose — God asks in order to humble Job, to bring him to a true knowledge of himself and free him from pride of heart.

- His hand — knowing how frost forms explains the process, not the Maker. The honest response to that ignorance is to rely on God instead of complaining.

Job 38:30 · Darby

When the waters lie hidden as in stone, and the face of the deep holdeth fast together.

Job demanded a hearing with God. God answers out of the whirlwind with questions, not explanations. Here He asks about water that turns solid and a sea whose surface locks shut. The question is not "how does ice form?" but "who does this, and were you there?"

Water turned to stone

One writer links the rain, the frost and the hardening of water to one will behind them all:

"Has the rain a father? Or who has begotten the drops of dew?" (v.28). Where and when the rain falls may look completely random to us, but it depends only on the will of our God and Father, who never makes a mistake. In the same way, He always sends frost in perfect wisdom for every occasion (v.29). Only one thing explains how water can harden like stone: God's law in sending the cold (v.30). Who truly understands this?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ice has a parent

The previous verse asks whose womb the ice came from. One writer takes that picture seriously and traces the cold back to its source:

How can we explain ice coming from a womb? A womb is a warm place. Each of us was formed in one! Can ice come from such a place? And how is ice formed? Ice contains much less energy than liquid water. As energy leaves, things get colder. Water freezes at 0 degrees Celsius (32 degrees Fahrenheit). But we must remember where that energy came from before it could leave. It came from the sun. God sent it to us. He sends it and He prepared the way for it to leave. All is in His control. All is for the display of His love and care for us. The ice has come from His "womb"!

Modernised from L. A. StasselOriginal wording

Not nature but a Person

We usually file the freezing of the deep under weather. One writer names what we lose when we speak only of impersonal forces:

It is sad when we reduce everything to an impersonal nature, as if these things simply had to happen, with no reference to anything in particular. But these verses show that God is at work behind what people call nature, and He works with full intelligence.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Why God asks about ice at all

Job had set himself up as judge of God's ways. God does not begin by explaining suffering. He begins by showing Job how little he knows of the smallest works of creation:

The first thing God does is to overwhelm the man who dared to sit in judgment on His moral ways. He makes him feel his complete ignorance and helplessness in the smallest works of divine power, even in creation.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The limits of science

It is tempting to think these questions are now closed, since we can explain freezing. One writer meets that head on:

And yet modern science must not claim it can answer where Job could not. Outward knowledge has advanced, and great laws and principles of nature have been discovered. But can the scientist of today give truer and more satisfying answers to these questions of God than Job could long ago? … What is the key to all these questions? It is God, the true knowledge of Himself. Knowing Him, we know the Author and Source of all knowledge. Leave Him out, and all of science is a blank wall, with the truth still hidden beyond it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From the frozen deep to trust

The same writer presses further. Ice and frost are not just things God does:

These things are not just acts; they are, so to speak, the offspring of God's love and care. Rain and dew, ice and frost are all the children of the great and good God.

Can we doubt Him? Shall we misjudge Him? Our unbelief and discontent testify against us, just as Job's complaints did against him.

Samuel Ridout · Samuel Ridout

Summary

- Cold comes from Him. Water hardens like stone only because God sends the cold — and even then, who truly understands it?

- Cold has a father. The ice comes from His "womb": He sent the energy in, He prepared the way for it to leave, and all of it displays His love and care.

- Cold is not a machine. It is sad to reduce this to impersonal nature. God Himself works, with full intelligence, behind what people call nature.

- Cold silences the critic. God overwhelms the man who sat in judgment on His moral ways. He shows him his own ignorance in the smallest works of creation.

- Cold invites trust. Rain, dew, ice and frost are children of the great and good God. So doubt and discontent, like Job's complaints, testify against us.

Job 38:31 · Darby

Canst thou fasten the bands of the Pleiades, or loosen the cords of Orion?

God answers Job out of the whirlwind with questions, not explanations. This one points to two groups of stars: can a man tie or untie what holds the heavens in place?

The Answer Job Asked For

Job had demanded that God reply to him. He got his wish, though not in the way he expected.

Out of that whirlwind, or golden storm-cloud, Jehovah replies to the vain questionings and lamentations of Job... "My desire is that the Almighty would answer me," was Job's closing word. He is now to have his wish granted; but how different the effect! "As a prince would I go near unto Him," he had declared. "I am vile" is what he has to say when he hears His voice.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Bands and Cords

The name behind "Pleiades" carries a picture, and the Hebrew points to a clearer rendering of the line.

Kimah. The Hebrew means "a heap or collection." Scripture names it alongside Arcturus and Orion, so it almost certainly refers to the group of stars we still call the Pleiades. The same Hebrew word appears as "seven stars" in Amos 5:8. There are many stars in the group, but seven are visible to the naked eye. Job 38:31 is better translated, "Can you fasten the bands of the Pleiades, or loosen the cords of Orion?"

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Turning Seasons

Commentators read the binding and loosing in more than one way. One reading turns on the seasons.

Some think the Pleiades are pictured here as a cluster of brilliant jewels: "Can you fasten the shining brooch on the bosom of the night?" Others point out that the Pleiades belong to Spring, and Orion to Winter. To loose the cords of Orion would be to break up Winter. To bind the sweet influences of the Pleiades would be to delay Spring. Can you hold back the coming of Spring, or bring Winter to an end? Can you change the ordered, onward march of the hosts of heaven, or move the North out of its place?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Pull That Holds a Whole System

Others read the chains as real forces that hold the stars in place.

The Lord draws his attention first to the Pleiades, meaning "the heap of stars." He asks if Job can "bind the chains of the Pleiades." Astronomers discovered "that the whole solar system is moving forward around Alcyone, the brightest star in the Pleiades"... The planets circle the sun. But the sun and all the planets circle Alcyone at the rate of 422,000 miles per day! Such are the chains of the Pleiades that hold the whole solar system captive. Could Job bind such forces? Could he loose the belt of Orion, the force that keeps Orion in its orbit?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The name itself may carry a hint.

Kima, the Pleiades, means a "hinge," or pivot — that on which all the heavenly bodies turn. Science points out that the whole visible universe is slowly turning round an unknown centre, seemingly not far from this hinge. What if God were hinting to Job at the great centre which holds all things to itself, showing him the One who holds all things in His hand?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Not a Lesson in Astronomy

So why did God ask Job about the stars?

Were the words of the Almighty meaningless to Job when He said, "Can you fasten the bands of the Pleiades, or loosen the cords of Orion?" These questions were not asked to interest Job in astronomy. They were asked to turn his attention to how small he is, compared with the greatness of the One he was fighting against, and to bring him to admit the hopeless folly he was pursuing. We can be sure the Lord's questions were in no way mysterious to him. They pointed to things he already knew something about.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Time has not made these questions any easier to answer.

What questions these are. Job had not a single answer to them... And we live 3000 years or more later, with all our boasted progress and our scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature. We still cannot answer these questions in a satisfactory way... But what is the Lord's aim in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man, and to humble man. He wants to bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needs, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Effect on Job

So what did all this do to Job?

Jehovah answered Job out of the whirlwind. He did not argue, and He did not even instruct. He displayed the witness of His majesty and power. So Job had to say, "Behold, I am of small account; what shall I answer you? I lay my hand on my mouth."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Bind — the line reads better as fastening the bands of the Pleiades and loosening the cords of Orion. The name means a heap of stars, seven of them visible to the eye.

- Loose — commentators differ. Some read it as holding back spring or ending winter. Others read it as the real forces that swing a whole solar system around Alcyone.

- Know — these questions were no mystery to Job. God asked them to show him how small he is beside the One he was arguing with.

- Fail — thousands of years later, science still cannot answer them. All our boasted progress falls short.

- Bow — God did not argue or instruct; He displayed His majesty, and Job laid his hand on his mouth.

Job 38:32 · Darby

Dost thou bring forth the constellations each in its season? or dost thou guide the Bear with her sons?

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Job 38:33 · Darby

Knowest thou the ordinances of the heavens? dost thou determine their rule over the earth?

God's questions to Job now move to the sky. Does Job know the fixed laws that govern the stars — and could he make those laws rule the earth below?

Why God asks instead of explains

God's whole speech comes as a string of questions. They put Job's fitness to judge God on trial.

Most of the address comes in the form of questions. Job had presumed to sit in judgment on Jehovah and His ways, so God tests his competence for it. What does he know? What can he do? Shall the creature dare to instruct God about His duties, to point out His failures, in fact to take over His rights? He is so puny in power, so ignorant, and so full of empty pride.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The laws of heaven and their grip on the earth

The verse assumes that what happens above shapes what happens below. One writer turns the question back on Job:

"Do you know the ordinances of the heavens? Can you establish their rule on the earth?" Conditions have an immense effect upon the earth. All of it is having an influence, either of a terrible kind or a beneficial kind. Who is it that has fixed all that? Was it you, Job?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Names known, ordinances unknown

Job was not ignorant of the night sky. The question moves past what he could name to what he could not do.

So the stars were common knowledge this early in history, and their names have stayed the same. But did Job know the ordinances God had established in the heavens? Did he even understand how the stars relate to the earth — let alone set them in places of dominion over the earth? Astrologers try to link the movement of the stars to events on earth, but their efforts only expose how little they know.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Heaven's rule by design

The phrase "their rule on the earth" points to an arrangement God built into this world from the start. Writers see in it the arrangement God built into this world from the start.

It is important to see this. When God formed the present system of this world, He made a heaven to this earth, so that heaven should rule the earth. The earth's blessing, in material things and in moral things, depends on its connection with heaven.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

That arrangement is not cold machinery. The opening chapters of Job show the comfort in it.

Every great movement of the powers here below turned on the mind of heaven. And the opening chapters let us know it is just as true of a single saint... The world might be in confusion, the eyes of the judges blinded, oppression in the place of righteousness, groaning and misery everywhere. Yet despite the misrule and rebellion, heaven is the spring and centre of power... Even Satan himself cannot act without God. What an immense comfort!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Modern science and the same questions

It is tempting to think that later science has supplied what Job lacked.

And yet modern science must not claim it can answer what Job could not. There has been advance in outward knowledge, with discoveries of great laws and principles of nature. But can the scientist of today give truer and more satisfying replies to these divine questions than the patriarch of old could?... What is the key to all these questions? It is God, the true knowledge of Himself. Knowing Him, we know the Author and Source of all knowledge. Leave Him out of account, and the sum of all science is a blank wall, beyond which the hidden truth still lies.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The One who can

The question has an answer — just not from Job.

One thing we do know. He, and He alone, can hold the stars in His hand. He numbers them and calls them all by name, and brings them out in due order, "because he is strong in power, not one is missing" (Isa. 40:26). The prophet reminds afflicted Israel that this One knows their affliction and their way.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Question, not lecture. God answers Job's complaints with questions. They test whether Job is fit to judge God's rule at all.

- Ordinances. The fixed laws that hold the stars are God's own arrangement. Job neither set them nor understood them.

- Dominion. God made heaven to rule the earth. Earth's blessing, in material and moral things, hangs on that link.

- Comfort. Power springs from heaven. Nothing on earth — not even Satan — can act apart from God.

- Answer. The One who names every star and never loses one is the same One who knows the afflicted person's way.

Job 38:34 · Darby

Dost thou lift up thy voice to the clouds, that floods of waters may cover thee?

God answers Job at last — not by explaining his suffering, but by asking him about clouds, rain and lightning. Here He asks whether Job can shout at the sky and get a downpour in reply.

Speaking to the Clouds

The picture is a man shouting an order at the sky. A heavy cloud will not obey him:

He had spoken of the rain in verses 25-28. Now He asks whether Job could order the clouds to drop their water whenever he wanted. We may see the clouds dark and heavy, and think at such a time that we could tell them to pour out their rain. Yet it may be that no rain falls at all. Lightning may trigger a rainfall, but who can send the lightning?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One Voice the Clouds Obey

What is impossible for Job is simple for God. The questions then move from the sky into man's own mind:

"Can you send forth lightnings, that they may go and say to you, 'Here we are'? Who has put wisdom in the inward parts or given understanding to the mind?" It comes down to man now. "Who can number the clouds by wisdom? Or who can tilt the waterskins of the heavens, when the dust runs into a mass and the clods stick fast together?" Well, all that is perfectly simple to God, and God has command in every bit of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God Asks

These are not riddles for their own sake. They sweep across every science, and they are aimed at something in Job:

And then the rain clouds, the lightnings and their control. What questions these are. They cover every field of what man calls "natural sciences" — geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy, and the rest. Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken his words would have been folly. And we, 3000 years or more later, are still unable to answer these questions in a satisfactory way. That is true for all our boasted progress and all our scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature. All the boasting of science about getting at the secrets of creation is nothing but foam. One breath of the Almighty scatters man's speculations to the winds, when they leave Him and His Word out. But what is the aim of the Lord in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the needed true knowledge of himself and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Beaten by Small Things Too

The sea and the stars dwarf any man. But God does not stop at the huge things:

He is not satisfied with showing man's smallness by what is vast. He also takes up things we might think small. He has travelled through the immense heavens and the uncontrollable sea, then the treasures of the snow and the hail, of the lightning and the waters. He looks at the heavenly bodies one by one. Then, towards the end of the chapter, He comes down to the little things of nature, where man is just as much at a loss. So it matters little whether we look at the greatest of God's works or the least. Everywhere we meet what man cannot know at all. Job had even claimed to judge the depths of God morally. But he could not face, and had not the slightest real idea of, what God is in the least part of His universe.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Clouds of Rain, Clouds of Grief

Job's own life was under a dark sky. One writer hears two kinds of cloud in these questions:

The LORD ends this part of His speech with fresh questions about the clouds, storms, and rain. Can Job bring down rain, or speak to the lightning flash? Does he have the understanding heart that knows the reason for the clouds — whether clouds of rain or clouds of grief? Can that heart bring the refreshing showers upon the dusty earth? What food for reverent meditation we have in all this.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Answer God Wants

God does not hand us power over the sky. He turns our eyes to the One who holds all power:

To Him all power in heaven and earth has been given. He has not given us power to change the order of nature, or to go up into those heavens. But He teaches us to give the true answer to His questions, and that answer is, "We see Jesus."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Your voice. God asks Job whether the clouds will obey him. A man may stand under a heavy sky and see no rain fall.

- God's voice. What Job cannot command, God commands — clouds, lightning and hard-baked ground alike.

- Every size. The questions run from the vast heavens down to small things, and man is equally at a loss with both.

- The aim. God asks to humble Job, to give him true knowledge of himself, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

- The answer. God gives us no power over nature. He teaches us the one reply that fits — "We see Jesus."

Job 38:35 · Darby

Dost thou send forth lightnings that they may go, and say unto thee, Here we are?

God answers Job out of the storm with a question about the lightning. The point is not weather but power: who gives the orders in this universe?

Why God Asks Instead of Explains

These questions sweep across the whole of nature, and Job could not answer one of them. They also have an aim:

And then the rain clouds, the lightnings and their control. What questions these are. They cover every field of what man calls "natural sciences." That means geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy, and more. Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken, his words would have been folly... But what is the Lord's aim in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man, and to humble man. It is to bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needs, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Test Anyone Can Try

Anyone can test this under a dark sky. The question about the lightning follows straight after the question about the clouds:

He had spoken of the rain in verses 25-28. Now He adds a question (v.34): could Job give orders to the clouds to drop their water when Job wanted it? We may see the clouds dark and heavy, and think at such a time that we could tell them to pour out their rain. But it may be that no rain falls at all. Lightning may trigger a rainfall, but who can send the lightning? (v.35).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Lightning Reports to Someone

The lightning does answer, "Here we are" — but not to Job. It answers to the One who made it. So does everything else God points to:

God speaks first about the lifeless things — the earth, sea, clouds, hail and rain. He shows three things about them. First, that He designed them; second, that He created them; and third, that He controls them. Consider the whole range of lifeless things that make up the world, and the whole range of living creatures. God commands them all... The lesson for Job was this. It was far too great for him to try to get to the bottom of things and look for explanations. God in His counsels and actions is altogether too big for us.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Great Things and Small

God does not only crush Job with the size of the universe. He also takes up the smallest things He has made:

It is clear that God is here bringing to nothing all the proud talk of Job. But He does not stop at showing man's littleness by what is vast. He takes up what we might think are small things... So it matters little whether we look at the greatest works of God or at the least. Everywhere we meet what is completely beyond man's understanding... Job had even claimed to judge the depths of God morally. But he could not face what God is in the least part of His universe, and he had not the slightest idea of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Knowing More Does Not Solve

We can now describe how lightning works. That was never the question. God asked who sends it:

Outward knowledge has advanced, and we have discovered great laws and principles of nature. But can the scientist of today give truer and more satisfying answers to these divine questions than Job could long ago? After all, what is human knowledge but a knowledge of our own ignorance, as Socrates said?... What is the key to all these questions? It is God, the true knowledge of Himself. Knowing Him, we know the Author and Source of all knowledge. Leave Him out of account, and the sum of all science is a blank wall, beyond which the truth still lies hidden.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Storm Before Shower

The storm is not the end of the story. Rain follows it, and Job's trial has the same shape:

But storms and storm-clouds are only the prelude to the rain. Here too God is seen, bringing refreshing after the storm. So with Job: the showers will follow his chastening. Who knows how to divide, to distribute, these refreshing showers? Man would distribute them unevenly, or at the wrong time. God knows when and how to send the welcome relief.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Command. The verse asks who gives orders to the lightning. God designed it, made it and controls it, and it answers "Here we are" to Him alone.

- Confession. God asks not to gain information but to humble Job — to bring him to a true knowledge of himself, out of the pride of his heart.

- Coverage. Job is beaten at both ends of the scale. He cannot handle the vast heavens, and he cannot handle the least thing God makes.

- Consequence. A man who cannot explain a rainstorm is in no position to sit in judgment on God's moral dealings with him.

- Comfort. The storm comes before the rain. God alone knows how and when to send the showers of relief.

Job 38:36 · Darby

Who hath put wisdom in the inward parts? or who hath given understanding to the mind?

God answers Job with questions, not explanations — about the earth, the sea, the stars and the rain. Then He turns inward, to the mind that has been arguing with Him, and asks who gave it its wisdom.

From the Vast to the Small

This question about the mind comes near the end of a long list, among the smaller items on it. Its place there is deliberate.

He is not satisfied with showing man's smallness by what is vast. He also takes up what we might think of as small things. He has travelled through the immense heavens and the uncontrollable sea, then the treasures of the snow and the hail, of the lightning and the waters. He notices various heavenly bodies in detail. But towards the end of the chapter He comes down to the little things of nature, where man fails just as badly. So it matters little whether we gaze at the greatest of God's works or look into the least. Everywhere we meet what is completely beyond man's understanding.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Deserves the Credit

God moves from the weather no man controls to the mind a man thinks he owns.

Lightning may trigger a rainfall, but who can send the lightning? If man does have any wisdom at all, who has put it in his mind? Is he to have the credit for this? Or does he manufacture his own understanding?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Learning Without the Giver

Centuries of study have not made this question easier to answer. Modern science stands before it where Job stood, and one writer names the key that unlocks it.

And modern science should not claim it can answer what Job could not. Outward knowledge has advanced. Men have discovered great laws and principles of nature. But can the scientist of today give truer and more satisfying replies to these questions from God than Job could long ago? What after all is human knowledge but a knowledge, as Socrates said, of our ignorance? What is the key to all these questions? It is God, the true knowledge of Himself. Knowing Him, we know the Author and Source of all knowledge. Leave Him out, and the sum of all science is a blank wall, with the hidden truth still lying beyond it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Heart That Reads the Clouds

Understanding is given for a purpose. A heart that has it can read the clouds — clouds of rain, and clouds of grief.

Can Job bring down rain, or speak to the lightning flash? Does he have the understanding heart that knows the reason for the clouds — whether clouds of rain or of grief — and that can bring the refreshing showers on the dusty earth?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Asks at All

God is not testing Job's education. The questions aim at his pride.

And then the rain clouds, the lightnings and their control. What questions these are! They cover every department of what man calls "natural sciences" — geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy. Job had not a single answer to these questions. If he had spoken, his words would have been folly… But what is the Lord's aim in asking them? To show that God is greater than man, and to humble him. To bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needed, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Argument Carried Upward

Everything God has asked so far belongs to the visible world. Job fails there. What then of the world he cannot see?

After all, what was God speaking about? Earthly things. Every one of them belongs to the natural world, and has to do with what is visible, with what is seen and temporary. Job is completely unable to answer even one of these questions. In fact no one has answered them to this day, for all the boasting of science. If that is how it stands with earthly things, what about the heavenly? What about the eternal things? There we depend on God entirely and completely. We know nothing except what He tells us.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Gift. Another put whatever wisdom a man has into his mind. He does not manufacture his own understanding.

- Reach. God's questions run from the immense heavens down to the least things in nature. At both ends man meets what is beyond him.

- Blindness. Leave God out and the sum of all learning is a blank wall; know Him, and you know the Source of all knowledge.

- Aim. These questions are not an exam in science but a cure for pride, bringing a man to the true knowledge of himself.

- Result. The mind fails even on visible things. For heavenly and eternal things we depend on God alone — we know only what He tells us.

Job 38:37 · Darby

Who numbereth the clouds with wisdom? or who poureth out the bottles of the heavens,

God's questions move from the stars down to the clouds just above Job's head. Job was ready to argue with God about His ways, but can he explain even the weather?

Questions Instead of Answers

God's answer to Job comes as a string of questions. One writer weighs how far they reach, and why God asks them.

And then the rain clouds, the lightnings and their control. What questions these are. They cover every department of what man calls "natural sciences." That includes geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy and more. Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken his words would have been folly. And we live 3000 years or more later. We boast of our progress and of our scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature. Yet we still cannot answer these questions in a satisfactory way. All the boasting of science about getting at the secrets of creation is nothing but foam. One breath of the Almighty, and man's speculations, apart from Him and His Word, are scattered to the winds. But what is the aim of the Lord in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the needed true knowledge of himself and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Counting What Will Not Hold Still

The dare to number the clouds tests the wisdom man claims for himself.

If man does have any wisdom at all, who has put it in his mind? Is he to have the credit for this? Or does he manufacture his own understanding? If one thinks he is wise, let him number the clouds! They are always changing and on the move, and often amazing in their magnificence. So we are wise to observe and marvel at the display they present, rather than to try to number them. May such lessons deeply impress us.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Waterskins of Heaven

The second half of the verse pictures the clouds as containers being tipped over. One translation of these lines brings out that picture:

Who regulates the clouds by wisdom, / Or who inclines the pitchers of heaven, / When the dust is poured into hardness, / And the clods are compacted together?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Tipping such vessels is not only a matter of power but of measure, since the same water can either save a harvest or drown it.

Passing from the starry heavens to the sky nearer the earth, Job describes the clouds in beautiful and scientifically accurate language. They are the containing vessels for the waters above the earth. It is God who gathers the vapours of the sky and condenses them into the thick clouds. If these waters fell upon the earth without restraint, the result would be a destructive flood. So He binds these waters in the clouds. He sends them down in gentle showers, as He wills and as the thirsty earth needs.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Small Things Defeat Man Too

After the vast heavens and the sea, God turns to the small things of nature. The effect on Job's argument is the same.

He does not stop at showing man's littleness by what is vast. He also takes up what we might think are small things by comparison. He has gone over the immense heavens and the uncontrollable sea, and then the treasures of the snow and the hail, of the lightning and the waters. He notices various heavenly bodies in detail. But towards the end of the chapter He comes down to the little things of nature, where man is just as much at a loss. So it matters little whether we gaze at the greatest works of God or look into the least. Everywhere we meet what is completely beyond man's reach... What could better expose the futility of man's accusing God? Job had even claimed to judge the moral depths of God. But he could not face what God is in the least part of His universe, and he had not the slightest adequate idea of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From Weather to the Sufferer's Own Story

Because this section closes God's questions about sky and storm, one commentator reads the clouds in two senses at once.

The LORD closes this part of His address with fresh questions about the clouds, storms, and rain. Can Job bring down rain, or speak to the lightning flash? Does he have that understanding heart which knows the reason for the clouds, whether of rain or of grief? Is it a heart that can bring the refreshing showers upon the dusty earth? What food for reverent meditation we have in all this.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Question. The verse asks; it does not inform. The wisdom to count the clouds and the power to pour them out belong to God alone.

- Wisdom. No one can count the clouds, because they never hold still. The wise response is to watch and marvel.

- Measure. God holds the water in the clouds. Poured out all at once it would flood the earth, so He sends it in gentle showers the dry earth needs.

- Scale. The least works of God humble man as much as the stars do. The greatest and the smallest are both past us.

- Trust. The man who cannot explain a rain cloud cannot judge God's moral ways. The God who times the showers times the griefs too.

Job 38:38 · Darby

When the dust runneth as into a molten mass, and the clods cleave fast together?

God's questions to Job have climbed through the stars and storms, and here they come down to mud: rain falls until dry dust packs into solid clods. The small scale is the point — Job can no more explain the soil than the sky.

Simple to God

The verse ends a run of questions about clouds and rain. One writer points out how simple all of it is to God:

"Who has put wisdom in the inward parts? Or who has given understanding to the mind?" It comes down to man now. "Who can number the clouds by wisdom? Or who can tilt the waterskins of the heavens… when the dust runs into a mass and the clods stick fast together?" All that is perfectly simple to God, and God has command over every bit of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer turns the question on Job — not only power over the rain, but the understanding behind it:

Jehovah concludes this portion of His address with fresh questions about the clouds, storms, and rain. Can Job bring down rain, or speak to the lightning flash? Does he have the understanding heart that knows the reason for the clouds — whether clouds of rain or of grief? Can he bring the refreshing showers upon the dusty earth?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Greatest and least

God has already pointed Job to the heavens, the sea, the snow and the hail. Now He comes down to soil and mud, and the change of scale is the point:

He is not content to show man's littleness by what is vast. He also takes up what we might think are small things. He travels over the immense heavens and the uncontrollable sea, then the treasures of the snow and the hail, of the lightning and the waters. He notices heavenly bodies one by one. But toward the end of the chapter He comes down to the little things of nature, where man is just as much at a loss. So it matters little whether we gaze at the greatest of God's works or look into the least. Everywhere we meet what is entirely beyond man's understanding… Job had even claimed to judge the depths of God morally. He could not face what God is in the least part of His universe, and he had no adequate idea of it at all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The aim behind the questions

The questions have an aim. One writer names it, and notes that centuries have not supplied the answers:

And then the rain clouds, the lightnings and their control. What questions these are! They cover every department of what man calls "natural sciences" — geology, meteorology, geography, oceanography, astronomy, and the rest. Job had not a single answer to these questions, and if he had spoken, his words would have been folly. And we live 3000 years or more later, with all our boasted progress and our scientific discoveries of the great laws of nature. We are still unable to answer these questions in a satisfactory way. But what is the Lord's aim in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man, and to humble man. To bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needs, and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

From weather to God's ways

The hand that sends rain can also hold it back. One writer links God's goodness in nature with His dealings with people:

If in goodness He meets and supplies the needs of all His creatures by His skilful handling of the forces of nature, then it is easy to see how He may deal with the sins of men and nations. He has only to order the working of these forces so that the supplies are cut back. God makes this work out in such a way as to leave unbelieving men without excuse. For the living God made heaven and earth and sea and all things in them. He "did not leave Himself without witness, for He did good by giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying your hearts with food and gladness" (Acts 14:15-17).

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

Where it lands

The questions were never answered by Job. They were answered in him:

Jehovah answered Job out of the whirlwind (Job 38, 39). He did not argue, and He did not even instruct. He displayed the witness of His majesty and power, until Job had to say, "Behold, I am of small account; what shall I answer you? I lay my hand on my mouth. I have spoken once, and I will not answer; twice, but I will proceed no further" (Job 40:3-5).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Dust — The question moves from stars to soil. Rain packs dry powder into solid clods, and all of it is simple to God.

- Scale — The least of God's works humbles Job as much as the greatest. Great or small, man meets what is beyond his understanding.

- Aim — The questions are not after information. They show that God is greater than man, and free Job from the pride of his heart.

- Reach — The God who sends rain can also hold it back. He deals with men and nations the same way, and the rains are His witness.

- Answer — Job never answers a single question. He lays his hand on his mouth — and that silence is what God was after.

Job 38:39 · Darby

Dost thou hunt the prey for the lioness, and dost thou satisfy the appetite of the young lions,

God has been questioning Job about the vastness of creation, and now He stops at a lion crouching in its den. The real question is who keeps the world alive, and whether a suffering man can trust that God.

From the Vast to the Small

God has already pointed Job to what is vast. Now He turns to small things, and Job is just as helpless there.

It is clear that God is here bringing to nothing all the proud talk of Job. But He does not stop at showing man's littleness by what is vast; He takes up what we might think are small things by comparison... So it matters little whether we look at the greatest or the least of God's works; everywhere we meet what is entirely beyond man's understanding... What could better expose how empty it is for man to accuse God? Job had even claimed the right to judge the depths of God morally. Yet he had no real idea of what God is in the smallest part of His universe, and he could not face it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Shift from Creator to Provider

Commentators mark this verse as a turn in God's speech. Up to now He has spoken of how He made the world. From here He speaks of how He keeps it alive.

We come next to see His wisdom and power displayed in His protecting and providing care over all His creatures. In this portion we pass from the glories of the Creator to look at the wisdom and goodness of the God of Providence. He has not only devised the wonderful plan of the universe. He has also filled the earth with living creatures who depend on Him for life and all things.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God Answers His Own Question

The question is rhetorical, and God answers it Himself. He does not just watch the hunt; He feeds the hunters.

"Can you hunt the prey for the lion?" It says, That is what I do — I find food for the lions and for the young lions too. There they are crouching in their dens, waiting in hiding for their prey. I do not let them die for lack of proper food. "Who provides food for the raven?" It is not only the great lion. It is also the much smaller raven, when its young ones cry to God — there it is, they cry to Him. They do not murmur; they cry. They tell their want. God has put that into them. It is a cry, and God hears it as directed to Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Lion and the Raven Together

God names the lion first, then the raven: the king of the beasts and a far smaller bird. One writer speaks of the lioness here — the mother hunting for her young.

If the king of wild beasts is named first, it is not without purpose that the raven follows. The contrast is marked; but the LORD cared for both. He is good to all, and His tender mercies are over all His works. Was Job the one to hunt prey for the lioness, and fill the craving of her young...? Was it for Job to provide the raven with meat?... He who counts the hairs of our heads sees every sparrow that falls... So here the LORD shows that man may boast of his scanty knowledge of beasts and birds and call their classification science. Even so, it is God's work, not man's, to enter into the need of every one and watch over it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Start with Predators

God begins with hunters — the animals that kill, and that man treats as enemies. That matters for Job, whom an unseen enemy was tearing apart.

God not only tolerates but cares for these creatures which prey upon others. They are part of His wise plan — once put under the hand of man and subject to him, but now turned against him as enemies. So Satan, whose attacks Job was feeling, was only a creature of God's will. Even by his hatred he worked out the purposes of God. If Job is ignorant of his schemes, God is not, and will bring good out of all his ravening and roaring.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Argument Turned Toward Job

A young bird's cry reaches God. That leaves one question for Job.

It is said here, "its young ones cry to God." Whether they do so with understanding or not is not the question. God recognises their cry. If so, did God not hear the cry of Job? Of course He did, though He did not answer Job at just the time and in the way Job thought He ought to.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Small. God turns from the vast to a den and a nest. Man is as helpless before the least of God's works as before the greatest.

- Provider. God moves from how He designed the universe to how He feeds every living thing in it.

- Cry. The raven's young cry to God. He put that cry into them, and He takes it as addressed to Himself.

- All. He feeds both the king of beasts and the small raven — His care reaches every creature He made.

- You. God hears a young raven; He heard Job too, and answered in His own time, not Job's.

Job 38:40 · Darby

When they crouch in [their] dens, [and] abide in the thicket to lie in wait?

God has been answering Job by walking him through creation — the heavens, the sea, the snow, the lightning. Now He comes down to a lion waiting in its den. The question is not about animals at all. It asks who feeds a hunter that no man could feed, and what that says about the God Job has been arguing with.

Where the question falls in God's answer

The lion comes at the end of a long sweep through creation.

God is here bringing to nothing all the proud talk of Job. But He is not content to show man's littleness only by what is vast. He also takes up what we might think comparatively small things. He has crossed the immense heavens and the uncontrollable sea, and then the treasures of the snow and the hail, of the lightning and the waters. At last, towards the end of the chapter, He comes down to the little things of nature, where man is just as much at a loss. So it matters little whether we look at the greatest or at the least of God's works. Everywhere we meet what is entirely beyond man's grasp.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A question that is really a claim

God asks whether Job hunts for lions. One writer hears the question as God's own answer.

"Will you hunt the prey for the lion?" It says, That is what I do; I find food for the lions and for the young lions too. There they are crouching in their dens, "and they lie in wait in their thicket." I do not let them die for want of proper food.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why start with predators

Of all creatures, hunters look the least needy.

He begins with the beasts of prey. That is not where we would likely begin. We think of predators as needing no outside care. But they need the care of God as much as every other creature. God has made them as they are, and provides for them in the very fact that they are able to hunt their own food. Who would think of hunting food for them, at least while they are in the wild?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Classifying animals versus feeding them

Job might name the creatures. He could never attend to each one's hunger.

If man boasts of his small knowledge of beasts and birds, and calls their classification science, Jehovah shows whose work this really is. It is His province, not man's, to enter into and watch over the need of every one. He watches those most remote from human dwellings, and no less those whose croaking may disturb man's ease. They are always before God, who has made them all and provides for each as a faithful Creator.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The hunter on a leash

The lion in the thicket is a killer, and God still feeds it. One writer follows that thought to the enemy behind Job's suffering.

God does not merely tolerate these creatures that prey on others — He cares for them. They are part of His wise plan: once put under man's hand and subject to him, but now turned against him as enemies. In the same way, Satan was only the creature of God's will. Job was feeling his attacks, yet even his hatred worked out God's purposes. If Job is ignorant of his schemes, God is not, and will bring good out of all his tearing and roaring.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The argument God is making to a sufferer

The whole list of animals is framed by creatures man would gladly be rid of. That framing carries the point Job is meant to feel.

It is significant that the series opens and closes with beasts and birds of prey. They might seem worthless, if not positively harmful, and yet He cares for them with unerring wisdom. Shall He fail to watch over His child who knows and trusts Him?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer puts the same reasoning as the question Job had been silently asking.

Had Job been thinking that God did not consider his welfare? Was there any creature, small or great, that Jehovah did not care for — the leviathan of the deep waters, or the sparrow on the housetop? He cared for every creature of His in its need. Would He not care for Job, the highest creature on earth, who also had a life beyond the grave?

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Summary

- Least. God comes down from stars and seas to a lion in a den. Man is out of his depth in God's smallest works as much as His greatest.

- Feeds. The question is God's own testimony: He finds food for the lions and their young, and does not let them die of hunger.

- Equips. Provision for a predator looks like ability — God made it able to hunt, and that is His care for it.

- Rules. God does not just tolerate the hunters — He cares for them. Satan too was only a creature of God's will, serving purposes he never intended.

- You. God cares for every creature in its need. He will not overlook Job, the highest creature on earth, who has a life beyond the grave.

Job 38:41 · Darby

Who provideth for the raven his food, when his young ones cry unto God, [and] they wander for lack of meat?

God has been questioning Job about His works — the sea, the snow, the stars, the hunting lion — and now about a raven's starving chicks. If God hears the croak of a raven, what about the man who thinks his own cry has gone unheard?

Why God Turns to Small Things

Why does God move down from the heavens to a hungry bird?

God is here bringing to nothing all the proud talk of Job. But He is not satisfied with showing man's littleness by what is vast. He also takes up what we might think are quite small things... It matters little whether we look at the greatest of God's works or at the least. Everywhere we meet something completely beyond the reach of man. Job had even claimed to judge the moral depths of God. But he could not face, and had not the slightest idea of, what God is in the least part of His universe.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why a Raven

Of all birds, God names an unclean one with a harsh voice.

God considers the young. Even a bird as unclean as the raven has its food provided by Him. It is wonderful to read that the helpless young ravens cry to God. Animals recognise the Creator by their instincts and look to Him for food. The sound may not be the sweet song of a lark, but only the croak of a raven. It reminds us of the witness this same Creator gave when He came in the form of a creature. "Consider the ravens: they neither sow nor reap, they have neither storehouse nor barn, and yet God feeds them. Of how much more value are you than the birds!" (Luke 12:24).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Scripture has more to say about this bird: its name, and the times God used it to feed others.

The word oreb comes from a root meaning "to be black"... When Noah sent the raven out from the ark, it could no doubt find food, though the dove could not, because it can feed on dead flesh... The meat-eating ravens brought flesh as well as bread to Elijah, and this shows God's miraculous power. He made them feed His servant. They are greedy eaters, and they have no storehouse or barn. Yet God feeds them, and He will surely feed those who trust in Him.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Cry That Reaches God

The chicks cannot hunt, and they have nothing stored. All they can do is make noise — and the verse sends that noise straight to God.

It is not only the great lion, but the much smaller raven, when its young ones cry to God — there it is, they cry to Him. They do not murmur; they cry. They tell their want, God has put that into them. It is a cry, and God hears it as directed to Himself. "They wander about for lack of food." But He hears and answers.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Argument Aimed at Job

Job had complained that God would not answer him.

The raven is a bird of prey (v.41), but if God did not provide the prey for them and their young, how could they continue to exist? It is striking that the verse says here, "its young ones cry to God." Whether they understand what they are doing is not the question. God recognises their cry. If so, did God not hear the cry of Job? Of course He did, though He did not answer Job at just the time and in the way that Job thought He ought to.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

From Scavengers to Sons

The choice of animals in the list is itself part of the argument.

It is significant that the list of animals opens and closes with beasts and birds of prey. They might look worthless, or even harmful, yet He cares for them with unerring wisdom. Shall He fail to watch over His child who knows and trusts Him?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Small. God humbles Job with a starving chick, not only with the heavens. Man is out of his depth in the least corner of creation as much as in the greatest.

- Unclean. God picked a black scavenger, not a songbird. His care does not stop at what we find attractive or useful.

- Cry. The young ravens do not murmur; they cry. God put that instinct in them, and He takes the sound as addressed to Himself.

- Heard. If a raven's croak reaches God, Job's cry was never ignored — God answered, but not on Job's timetable or in Job's way.

- More. The same Creator later stood on earth and pointed to these birds: no barn, no harvest, yet fed — and you are worth far more.

Job 39:1 · Darby

Knowest thou the time when the wild goats of the rock bring forth? dost thou mark the calving of the hinds?

God answers Job with questions, and in Job 39 they turn from the world's structure to the creatures that fill it. The chapter opens with two births no human ever sees, and asks a suffering man what he can learn from animals he cannot reach or help.

Creatures Out Of Man's Reach

God's first example lives where no one can follow. One commentator walks through the verse:

"Do you know the time when the wild goats of the rock give birth?" They are generally very hard for man to reach. They are found in the great heights of the mountains. "Can you watch when the deer give birth? Can you number the months that they complete? Or do you know the time when they bring forth? They bow themselves; they bring forth their young ones, they cast out their pangs; their young ones are in good condition" — though they are hunted to death, and man is fond of feeding on them, yet God provides for them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

(He uses an older translation; the ESV says "mountain goats" and "the calving of the does.")

Not A Test Of Science

These questions sound like a quiz about animal biology. One commentator says that reading misses the point:

Think of the blindness of rationalism. Here is a magnificent disproof of human presumption and complaint against God. Rationalism sees in it no more than Job's ignorance of how long a deer, or another animal named, takes in gestation! Clearly the question here is not zoological learning. It is about the kind and generous care that goes with perfect knowledge of every creature. His watchful oversight matched the goodness and wisdom that made them. It covered young and old, beast and bird, even the least familiar and the hardest to reach. If God cared like that, was it not for Job to listen and learn, instead of darkening counsel with words without knowledge?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Counted One By One

God's care is not aimed at the species in general. It reaches each animal at the moment that animal needs it. The same writer ties this to what Jesus told His disciples:

Again, was it Job who looked after the mountain goat, or kept watch over the deer at a time most critical for themselves and their offspring? Certainly there is not one whose months El does not count, whose time of bearing He does not know. He counts the hairs of our heads. He sees every sparrow that falls, and has His part in all. The Saviour told this to the trembling disciples to encourage them as they went out at His word.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"El" is a Hebrew name for God.

What Job Cannot Do

Knowing a fact is not the same as keeping a life. Job may know how long these animals carry their young. The question goes further:

What does Job know about the habits of the wild animals living in the mountains no one can reach? "The high mountains are for the wild goats" (Ps. 104:18). He might know in general how long these elusive creatures carry their young. But does he know and watch over each parent animal, guard its life, and bring it safely through its time of danger? How amazing and how consistent it all is, and how completely beyond man's knowledge or power. And these young ones, kept for a short time by their parent, then going off on their own — who watches over them?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Comfort Hidden In The Question

God's care for these cliff animals is not only about animals. One writer applies it to people in trouble:

If God cares for these "rock-climbers," will He not watch the steps of His timid people who are trying to climb over the rugged rocks of adversity? Will He not be with them in the birth-pangs of frightening experiences, and give them a happy outcome from all their troubles?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Counted Days And The Birth Of Christ

One writer carries this question about timing into the birth of Christ:

Days of God are being fulfilled; days that God is counting; days, we may say with spiritual sensitivity, that Mary counted. Think of God entering into this great matter, the fulfilment of days. He says to Job, "Do you know when the mountain goats give birth?" (Job 39:1). The sympathetic interest of God in these great matters — entirely beyond the understanding of men! The number of Mary's days was fulfilled. In Galatians we are told, "When the fullness of time had come." These were days counted by God, days counted by the angels.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

Summary

- Reach — The examples lie beyond man: high rocks, elusive animals, births nobody attends.

- Care — The point is not zoology. It is care joined to perfect knowledge, and Job's part was to listen and learn.

- Counted — God counts the months of every animal that carries young. He knows the hour of every birth no human eye sees.

- How much more — If God brings a wild goat safely through her danger, He keeps His people climbing the rocks of adversity.

- Timing — The God who times a deer's calving also fulfilled the counted days that brought Christ into the world.

Job 39:2 · Darby

Dost thou number the months that they fulfil? and knowest thou the time when they bring forth?

God is still questioning Job, and His questions have moved from how the world was made to the wild deer on the hills. Counting months and knowing the hour of a birth sounds like a small thing. Job cannot do it. God does it for every animal alive.

The Turn from Sky to Living Creatures

God's questions do not stay in the sky.

In the material world God shows Job that he knows nothing about how any of His works began. Now, in Job 39, God makes him think about how unable he is to rule over the animal world.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Notice which animals He picks.

The Lord now turns Job's attention to animals not in the least aggressive, the wild goats and the deer. Indeed, instead of being aggressive, they are elusive. Did Job understand all about them? — when they bear their young, how many months they carry them, and so on. How much Job knew at the time we do not know. There is more general knowledge of these things now. Even so, how many people know all about such matters from real experience with the animals themselves?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

God Counts What No One Records

The verse turns on counting, and on knowing a time. Who does that counting?

Again, was it Job who looked after the mountain goat? Did he keep watch over the deer at the time of greatest danger to themselves and their young? Certainly there is not one whose months God does not count, not one whose time of bearing He does not know. He who counts the hairs of our heads sees every sparrow that falls, and has His part in all. The Saviour told the trembling disciples this to encourage them, as they went out at His word.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not Zoology, but Care

It would be easy to read the verse as a quiz about animal biology.

Think of the blindness of rationalism! Here is a magnificent disproof of human pride and complaint against God, and rationalism sees no more in it than Job's ignorance of how long a deer, or another animal named here, carries her young. Clearly the question here is not about zoological knowledge. It is about the generous care that goes together with perfect knowledge of every creature. God kept such watchful oversight over young or old, beast or bird, even the least familiar or the hardest to reach, and He did it with the goodness and wisdom that made them. If so, was it not for Job to listen and learn, instead of darkening counsel by words without knowledge?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Knowing a fact and keeping watch are not the same thing.

He might know in general how long these elusive creatures carry their young. But does he know and watch over each parent animal, guard its life, and bring it safely through its time of danger? How amazing and uniform it all is, how utterly beyond man's knowledge or power. And these young, for a brief time sustained by their parent, then going off by themselves — who watches over them?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Comfort for the Sufferer

Job was a man in the middle of terrible loss. Ridout turns this picture toward people in trouble.

If God cares for these "rock-climbers," shall He not watch the steps of His timid people who are seeking to climb over the rugged rocks of adversity? Will He not be with them in the birth pangs of fearful experiences, and give them a happy outcome from all their troubles?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God Who Numbers Months

Another writer follows this counting of months to a later birth.

Days of God are being fulfilled; days that God is numbering; days, we may say with spiritual delicacy, that Mary numbered. The sympathetic interest of God in these great matters is entirely beyond the understanding of men! The number of Mary's days was fulfilled. Galatians tells us, "When the fullness of time had come." These were days numbered by God, days numbered by the angels.

Modernised from F. A. HughesOriginal wording

The God who counts the months of a deer counted those days too.

Summary

- Counted. No creature's months go uncounted by God, and no birth in the wild happens outside His knowledge.

- Cared for. The counting is not cold record-keeping. In God, perfect knowledge and generous care go together.

- Hidden. God names animals that keep away from people. His attention reaches where no human eye looks.

- Humbled. Job could not rule or even track the animal world, so he was in no position to correct the God who does both.

- Comforted. If He brings a deer safely through her hour of danger, He will bring His own people through theirs to a good end.

Job 39:3 · Darby

They bow themselves, they give birth to their young ones, they cast out their pains;

God questions Job about the wild goats and deer of the mountains, down to the hour when their young are born. The question is not whether Job knows the timing, but who is present at the birth — and what that says about the God Job has complained about.

A Birth No One Attends

These animals live where people cannot follow. No one watches the birth this verse describes. One writer asks whether Job could do more than know a general fact about the species:

What does Job know about the habits of the wild animals living in the unreachable mountains? "The high mountains are for the wild goats" (Psalm 104:18). He might know in general how long these shy creatures carry their young. But does he know each parent animal? Does he watch over it, guard its life, and bring it safely through its time of danger? How amazing and how consistent it all is, and how completely beyond man's knowledge or power. And these young, kept for a short while by their parent, then going off on their own — who watches over them?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Pangs Cast Away

"They cast out their sorrows" in older versions renders what modern translations give as labour pains ending. One rendering of the passage sets the bowing, the bearing, and the letting go in a single sweep:

They bow themselves, they bring forth their young, / They cast away their pangs. / Their young fatten, grow up in the desert, / They go forth, and return to them no more!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer notes what surrounds these births: these are hunted animals, yet their young come through and thrive.

"Their young ones are in good liking" — though they are hunted to death, and man is fond of feeding on them, yet God provides for them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a Lesson in Zoology

Some have read the question as a quiz about how long animals carry their young. One writer answers that reading:

Think how blind rationalism is. Here is a magnificent disproof of human pride and complaint against God, and all it sees is that Job did not know how long a hind or some other animal named takes to carry her young! Clearly the question here is not about animal science. It is about the kind care that goes with perfect knowledge of every creature. God kept this watch over young and old, beast and bird, even the least familiar or the most unreachable. His care matched the goodness and wisdom that made them. So was it not for Job to listen and learn, instead of darkening counsel by words without knowledge? And His ways with His people go far deeper than His dealings with the animal world.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The One Who Counts the Months

The chapter keeps asking Job whether this watch is his to keep. One writer gives the answer, and carries it from the deer to the disciples:

Again, was it Job who looked after the mountain goat, or kept watch over the hinds at a time most critical for themselves and their offspring? There is not one whose months God does not count, and not one whose time of bearing He does not know. He counts the hairs of our heads. He sees every sparrow that falls, and has His part in all. The Saviour told the trembling disciples this to encourage them, as they went out at His word.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why It Was Said to a Suffering Man

Job was suffering, and he had complained about God's dealings with him. One writer argues from the wild goat up to Job himself:

Man does not care for these animals, but God does. And if God cares for these climbers of the rocks, how much more does He care for humans who face difficulties that may seem impossible to overcome? Let Job consider this well.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer applies the climb and the birth pangs to God's own people:

If God cares for these "rock-climbers," will He not watch the steps of His timid people who are trying to climb over the rugged rocks of adversity? Will He not be with them in the birth-throes of terrifying experiences, and give them a happy outcome from all their troubles?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Hidden. The birth happens in mountains no human visits, so if anyone is watching over it, it must be God.

- Counted. God knows more than the species in general. He counts the months of each creature and knows her hour of bearing.

- Released. The birth is over, the danger passes, and the young are strong — God's provision, not man's.

- Misread. The question is not a test in animal science. The point is God's kind care, joined to perfect knowledge of every creature.

- Applied. If God stays with a doe in her hour of danger, He stays with His people in theirs. He gives them a happy outcome from all their troubles.

Job 39:4 · Darby

Their young ones become strong, they grow up in the open field, they go forth, and return not unto them.

Job 39:4 belongs to a long line of questions God puts to Job, holding up one creature after another before a man who had argued about God's ways. The young mountain goats grow strong, leave, and never come back — so who, if not Job, watched over them?

Place in Jehovah's Answer

God turns from the wonders of creation to living creatures. The list has an aim.

From the wonders of lifeless creation above, beneath, and around, Jehovah now turns to the animal kingdom. The lion, the raven, the wild goat or ibex, the wild ass, the wild ox, the ostrich, the horse, the hawk, and the eagle appear one after another. They are there to convince the man who dares to sit in judgment on God's doings that he is ignorant and powerless.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a Test of Zoology

It would be easy to read these verses as a quiz on natural history. Commentators press hard against that reading.

Think of the blindness of rationalism! Here is a magnificent disproof of human presumption and complaint against God. Yet rationalism sees no more in it than Job's ignorance of how long a hind, or other animal named, takes to carry her young. Clearly the question here is not knowledge of animals. It is the kind care that goes together with perfect knowledge of every creature. Suppose God kept such watchful oversight over young or old, beast or bird, even the least familiar or the hardest to reach. Then Job's part was to listen and learn, not to cloud the matter with words without knowledge.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strong in a Place Beyond Man

Where does this care happen? Far from people, and among animals men hunt for food.

"Do you know when the mountain goats of the rock give birth?" (Job 39:1). Man can rarely reach them. They live high up in the mountains. "Their young ones become strong; they grow up in the open; they go out and do not return to them." Though men hunt them to death and are fond of eating them, God still provides for them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Young That Leave and Never Come Back

The closing line describes a parting: the mother's brief care ends, and the young go off alone.

What does Job know about the habits of the wild animals living in mountains he cannot reach? "The high mountains are for the wild goats" (Ps. 104:18). He might know in general how long these elusive creatures carry their young. But does he know and watch over each parent animal, guard its life, and bring it safely through its time of danger? How amazing and how steady it all is, and how far beyond man's knowledge or power. And these young, kept for a short while by their parent, then going off on their own — who watches over them?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From the Rocks to the Sufferer

The argument now runs upward, from the animals to man himself.

Then what about the goats of the rock and their young? His all-seeing eye saw them out on the desert rocks, and He watched over their young. Could He not then watch the steps of His higher creature, man, His own offspring?

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same picture becomes comfort for people in trouble.

If God cares for these "rock-climbers," will He not watch the steps of His timid people as they climb the rugged rocks of adversity? Will He not be with them in the birth-pangs of frightening experiences? Will He not give them a happy outcome from all their troubles?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Counted — God keeps a count no man keeps. Job may know in general how long a wild goat carries her young. He never watched over a single one of them.

- Cared for — What God counts, He also keeps. The questions are not about animal facts but about "the kind care that goes together with perfect knowledge of every creature."

- Concealed — This care happens where no one is looking: high rocks, open country, creatures "the least familiar or the hardest to reach." God's goodness needs no audience.

- Continued — When the young "go out and do not return," the mother's care ends and God's does not. He provides for the hunted, and He watches the young that go off alone.

- Concluded — If He watches the young goat, He watches the sufferer. "Could He not then watch the steps of His higher creature, man?" That is the question the whole parade of creatures leaves with Job.

Job 39:5 · Darby

Who hath sent out the wild ass free? and who hath loosed the bands of the onager,

God is questioning Job about the creatures He made. Here He points to an animal nobody owns, turned loose in the wilderness with no driver — and He asks who granted it that freedom.

The Point of the Question

The chapter is often read as a test of Job's knowledge. One writer answers that God, not man, decides how each creature lives.

Clearly the question here is not one of zoological knowledge, but of that kind care which goes with perfect knowledge of every creature. God watched over them all with such care — young and old, beast and bird, even the least familiar or the most out of reach. He did so according to the goodness and wisdom that made them. Was it not for Job, then, to listen and learn, instead of darkening counsel with words without knowledge? And certainly His ways with His people are far deeper than His dealings with the animal realm. Yet even there we see His sovereign disposal everywhere. He, not man, has made them what they are, and ordered their habits and their homes. He has given some animals to carry man's loads. Others He has freed from any such service, like the wild donkey. Its house is the desert and its home the steppe, where a city's noise and a driver's shouts are unknown.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Creature Beyond Human Reach

So where does an animal like this live, and who feeds it?

The wild donkey is a completely different kind of creature, found mainly in the plains or wilderness. Man just does not control the habits of this animal that is "free as the breeze." Though it lives in "the barren land," God somehow sustains it in finding food. It keeps away from the noise of the city and is not like the tame donkey that must obey the direction of a driver.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Dependence Underneath the Freedom

A suffering man might envy such freedom. One writer turns that envy into hope.

He is entirely different from the wild goats in ways and habits. But one thing he has in common with them: he is completely dependent on his Creator. What control has Job over a creature like this, who knows no bonds and serves no master? As he thinks of their freedom, Job might sigh under his own burdens. God is able to loosen his bonds. Let him not doubt, but wait on God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Mirror Held Up to Man

The verse gives the creature two names, and one reference work reads both as a picture of man — not a flattering one.

The wild donkey is very wild and very swift. It is seldom tamed. It is therefore a fitting emblem of man's natural birth (Job 11:12).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Another writer turns the picture on the reader.

In the Word of God the donkey is not only presented as unclean; it is also the very synonym for self-will. Read the Lord's account of him in His reasoning with His servant in Job 39:5-8. And what is sin? ... sin is lawlessness. In other words, sin is doing our own will and neglecting the will of God. Who can claim to be exempt here? Who among us does not love to have his own way, whatever it costs?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A Portrait of a Nation

One writer sees a real people in this description: the descendants of Ishmael, Abraham's son by Hagar.

Scripture shows us how God governs the world in providence, apart from His covenant. It does this in the very books that reveal the dealings of His electing grace... No more vivid a sketch was ever drawn than the one given of Ishmael's descendants in the words quoted [Job 39:5-8]. Such exactly are the Bedouins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — The "who" in the verse has one answer, and it is not Job; God alone set this creature loose and no man ever tamed it.

- Care — The subject is not animal facts. It is God's kind oversight of creatures too far off for man to notice. Job's part was to listen, not argue.

- Freedom — God gave some animals to carry man's loads. This one He freed from all service. Even wildness is an assignment.

- Mirror — Writers see in this untamed animal a picture of man as he is born. It pictures self-will too, and self-will is sin: doing our own will and neglecting God's.

- Release — The freest creature alive still depends on its Maker. The God who loosed its bonds can loose Job's. So let him wait on God.

Job 39:6 · Darby

Whose house I made the wilderness, and the salt plain his dwellings?

God points Job to a creature that lives where nothing grows, and asks who gave it that ground. Job had been demanding answers; now he must name who houses an animal he does not feed, own, or command.

The house God Himself assigned

The words "home" and "dwelling place" are the language of a landlord, not a bystander. One writer sees the same hand behind every animal in the chapter.

He, not man, has made them what they are, and ordered their habits and their habitations. If He has given some to carry man's loads, He has freed others from any such service. Take the wild donkey, with its house in the desert and its dwelling place on the open plain. There no city noise and no driver's shouts ever reach him. He can range the mountains at will as he searches out every green thing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A house that produces nothing

"Arid plain" and "salt land" name ground that grows no crop. Yet the animal placed there does not starve.

The wild donkey is a totally different type of creature, found mainly in the plains or wilderness. Man just does not control the habits of this animal, which is "free as the breeze." He lives in "the barren land," yet God somehow sustains him in finding food. He avoids the noise of the city and is not like the tame donkey that must obey the direction of a driver.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Free creature, burdened man

Job, tied down by suffering, might have envied that freedom. One writer turns the envy into hope.

What control has Job over a creature like this, who knows no bonds, serves no master? As he thinks of their freedom, Job might sigh beneath his burdens. God is able to loosen his bonds. Let him not doubt, but wait on God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The picture of a will that answers to no one

Elsewhere in Scripture this animal stands for something in us. One writer gathers those passages, quoting them from an older translation.

In the Word of God the donkey is not only represented as unclean; it is also the very synonym for self-will. Read the Lord's account of him when He reasons with His servant in Job 39:5-8. And what is sin? … In other words, sin is doing our own will and neglecting the will of God. Who can claim to be exempt here? Who among us does not love to have his own way at whatever cost? … Job 11:12 is very pointed when it says: "Vain man would be wise, though man be born a wild donkey's colt." Genesis 16:12, correctly rendered, says of Ishmael, "He will be a wild donkey of a man."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Another writer applies the picture to Job himself.

But in some respects Job was like the wild donkey — independent, rebellious, wanting his own way. So he had another object lesson to consider.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A description that has outlived Job

One writer reads these words as a sketch of a real people whose life still matches them.

No more graphic a sketch was ever drawn than is given of Ishmael's descendants in the words quoted here (Job 39:5-8). Such exactly are the Bedouins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the question was for

The chapter's parade of animals had a purpose beyond the animals.

Clearly the question here is not about knowledge of animals. It is about the kind care that goes with perfect knowledge of every creature. God watched over young and old, beast and bird, even the least familiar and the most out of reach, according to the goodness and wisdom that made them. Was it not for Job, then, to listen and learn, instead of darkening counsel by words without knowledge? And certainly His ways with His people are far deeper than His dealings with the animal world.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Given. The desert is not where the donkey escaped to; it is the house God handed him. The verse is God naming what He assigned.

- Sustained. The ground yields nothing, yet God feeds the creature. He keeps what no man owns or controls.

- Free. No driver, no master, no bonds — and still living on what God gives. Real freedom runs on His supply.

- Mirrored. The unbridled donkey is Scripture's picture of self-will, and Job had to see himself in it.

- Applied. If God tracks a creature no one values, He is not neglecting a suffering man. Job's part was to stop arguing and learn.

Job 39:7 · Darby

He laugheth at the tumult of the city, and heareth not the shouts of the driver;

God is questioning Job out of the storm. Here He points to the wild donkey — an animal nobody owns, nobody feeds, nobody drives. Who arranged a life like that? Who gave one animal a stall and a master, and another the open waste and no voice to obey?

Who Loosed the Bands

One writer sets out what these animal questions were for: God's care for each creature, and His free hand in deciding how each one lives.

This is plainly not a question about animal science. It is a question about the kind care that goes with perfect knowledge of every creature. Suppose God did watch so carefully over young or old, beast or bird, even the least familiar or most out of reach. Suppose His care matched the goodness and wisdom which made them. Was it not then for Job to listen and learn, instead of darkening counsel by words without knowledge? … He, not man, has made them what they are, and ordered their habits and their homes. Some He has given to be the burden-bearers of man. Others He has freed from any such service — like the wild donkey, with its house in the desert.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No City, No Driver

The verse names two sounds — city noise and a driver's shout — and this donkey answers to neither. One writer shows how he lives instead.

The wild donkey is a completely different creature. He is found mainly in the plains or wilderness. Man does not control the habits of this animal that is "free as the breeze." He lives in "the barren land," yet God somehow sustains him in finding food. He avoids the tumult of the city and is not like the tame donkey that must obey the direction of a driver.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Mirror Held Up to Job

The same writer turns the portrait back on the man listening to it.

Would men have even thought of creating an animal like this? But in some respects Job was like the wild donkey — independent, rebellious, wanting his own way. So he had another object lesson to consider.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer hears longing here rather than rebuke. Job was the one in chains, while this creature roamed free.

What control has Job over a creature like this, who knows no bonds, serves no master? As he thinks of their freedom, Job might sigh beneath his burdens. God is able to loosen his bonds. Let him not doubt, but wait on God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Picture of Self-Will

Other parts of Scripture use this animal as a symbol. One writer takes it straight to the meaning of sin.

In the Word of God the donkey is not only represented as unclean; it is also the very synonym for self-will. Read the Lord's account of him as He reasons with His servant in Job 39:5-8. And what is sin? … "Sin is lawlessness." In other words, sin is doing our own will and neglecting the will of God. Who can claim to be exempt here? Who among us does not love to have his own way at whatever cost?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Desert Dwellers

One writer applies the picture to a real people: the descendants of Ishmael, a son of Abraham.

No sharper picture of Ishmael's descendants was ever drawn than the words quoted here: "He scorns the tumult of the city; he hears not the shouts of the driver" (Job 39:5-8). The Bedouins are exactly like this.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Better Freedom

The wild donkey hears no driver. One writer sets the opposite picture beside him: a horse that does.

The wild donkey likes his own wild ways. He likes to run about at will and refuses to be bridled or tamed, or to submit himself to another's will. Is this not a striking picture of the heart that has never been changed by God? But a horse in Pharaoh's chariots has been broken in. It has learned to give up its own wishes. It yields to the pull of the rein in its master's hand, and so spends its energy in its master's service.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Freedom given. The donkey did not win his liberty; God loosed the bands and assigned him the desert instead of the stall.

- Freedom fed. No driver means no feeder either. Yet God feeds him in the barren land, and His care reaches the creature that serves no man.

- Freedom mirrored. God held up a mirror. Job too was independent and wanting his own way. Commentators differ here: some read the scene as rebuke, others as comfort that God can loosen Job's bonds too.

- Freedom exposed. Hearing no driver is the picture of self-will. Doing our own will in place of God's will is what sin is.

- Freedom fulfilled. Real freedom is not running loose in the desert. It is the broken horse in the chariot, giving its strength to the rein and to its Master's service.

Job 39:8 · Darby

The range of the mountains is his pasture, and he searcheth after every green thing.

God's answer to Job runs through creature after creature. Here He stops at the wild donkey — an animal no one owns, feeding where no farmer plants. Who arranged that life, and what does it say to Job?

The Creator Assigned the Habitat

One writer puts the wild donkey next to the working animals. The same hand arranged both.

He, not man, has made them what they are, and ordered their habits and their homes. He has given some animals the work of carrying man's burdens. Others He has kept free from any such service. Take the wild donkey. Its house is the desert and its dwelling-place the open country. There a city's noise and a driver's shouts are unknown. It can range the mountains at will as it searches out every green thing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fed Where Nothing Grows

The pasture in this verse is not rich farmland.

The wild donkey lives in "the barren land," yet God somehow sustains him in finding food. ... His pasture is the lower ranges of the mountains, not the rocks. There he may find green vegetation.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Care for Creatures Men Ignore

God's care reaches creatures men would write off. The argument then runs from them to Job.

The series opens with God's provision for beasts and birds of prey, as seen in the lion and the raven. Next, the wild animals of the mountain and desert come under His all-wise care... They might seem worthless, even harmful, yet He cares for them with unerring wisdom. Shall He fail to watch over His child who knows and trusts Him?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Portrait Job Could Recognise

Commentators also read the animal as a mirror held up to Job.

Would men have even thought of creating an animal like this? But in some respects Job was like the wild donkey — independent, rebellious, wanting his own way. So he had another object lesson to consider.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The lesson is not for Job alone.

In the Word of God the donkey is not only unclean; it is also the very picture of self-will. Read the Lord's account of him as He reasons with His servant in Job 39:5-8. And what is sin? Scripture defines it in 1 John 3:4: "sin is lawlessness." In other words, sin is doing our own will and neglecting the will of God. Who can claim to be exempt here? Who among us does not love to have his own way whatever the cost?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Comfort for a Man in Bonds

Suffering held Job down while this animal roamed free.

Moving from the mountain to the plain, the Lord points out the one creature that lives in those waste places: the wild donkey. He is quite different from the wild goats in ways and habits. But he shares one thing with them: he depends completely on his Creator. What control has Job over a creature like this, who knows no bonds and serves no master? As he thinks of their freedom, Job might sigh under his burdens. God is able to loosen his bonds. Let him not doubt, but wait on God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Description That Still Fits

One writer applies the same description to a people still living this way.

No more vivid sketch was ever drawn than the one given of Ishmael's descendants in the words quoted... Such exactly are the Bedouins. No sober Christian supposes an ongoing miracle in Ishmael's case. Yet what God said of that race is as sure as what He said of Israel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Freed by God. God gave this donkey his freedom. He made the desert his home and kept him clear of human service.

- Fed by God. His pasture is barren ground below the rocks. God feeds him there as he searches out every green thing.

- Known by God. His care reaches even the creatures men count worthless. It will not fail His child who trusts Him.

- Mirrored in Job. Independent, rebellious, wanting his own way: the animal pictures self-will. God asks Job to see himself in it.

- Released by God. The One who loosed this creature's bands can loose Job's; the lesson ends not in envy of the free but in waiting on God.

Job 39:9 · Darby

Will the buffalo be willing to serve thee, or will he lodge by thy crib?

God turns from the wild donkey of the desert to an animal even stronger, and asks Job whether he could ever put it to work. The question is not about farming. It asks whether Job can master even one beast that God made free.

Which Animal Is Meant

Older English Bibles call this creature a "unicorn." That name came from an early Greek translation, not from the Hebrew text.

The Hebrew word is reem. The Septuagint translated it by two Greek words, hadros and monokeros, and from the second of these the Authorised Version took the word 'unicorn.' Nothing in Scripture suggests that the animal had only one horn. In fact Deuteronomy 33:17 speaks of 'the horns of a unicorn' (see margin). It must have been an animal the Israelites knew well. Its great strength and wildness are its main features: it cannot be put to use, like the tame ox, for farm work.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Rising Scale

A single-horned beast can be ruled out on geography alone. The three creatures of this chapter also come in a rising order.

There is only one animal with a single horn, the Indian rhinoceros, and it is found only in southern Asia. Here the word should be the wild ox. We have the wild goat (v. 1), the wild donkey (v. 5), and now the wild ox (v. 9). They follow one after another. This is a more powerful animal than either of the others. There is a rising in the scale.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strength That Man Cannot Use

The wild ox has more than enough muscle for the plough. That is what makes the question sting. The power is there, and Job cannot get at it.

The wild ox is understood to be a large antelope that cannot be tamed. Can its will be broken by men as domesticated cattle are, so that it willingly serves the authority of man? (v. 9). Would it willingly lie down in a manger where cattle are quite content? Could Job make it plod along a furrow, pulling a plough as oxen were taught to do? (v. 10). The strength of the antelope was more than enough for this, but how could man make use of such strength? Could he trust such an animal to bring home grain from the field? (v. 12). Of course the answer to all these questions is no. But this teaches us that God's creation holds much variety that man cannot even understand. It also shows up man's limits against God's unlimited resources.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Dominion With Boundaries

God gave man rule over the creatures, yet He kept some of them outside that rule. The wild ox is one of them, and God never handed it over to Job.

Job cannot pretend — and neither can anyone else, whatever they think or say — that he can bring the wild ox down to the ordinary work of man. No one can make him submit quietly to his control or care. His strength might be priceless. But God made all things, and He gave Adam dominion over fish and bird, cattle, every creeping thing, and all the earth. Even so, He did not tie the wild ox to the furrow with a cord, or make him harrow behind Job. Nor did He ask Job to leave the work of the field in his hands, at the beginning or at the end.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God Asks At All

God is not giving a lesson in nature study. He is pressing a man who had been arguing with his Maker.

But what is the Lord's aim in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needed, and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Hidden Comfort

There is more here than rebuke. The One who rules what Job cannot touch also holds Job's own wild troubles.

God is still speaking about wild creatures. He asks if Job can control the great wild ox and make it serve him, or the wild antelope of the plains. Will it plough and carry the loads of farm work like the ox? That wild, untamed nature yields to One only. Can Job doubt that He will control all things, even the wild powers of evil, and make them the obedient servants of His will? So God will take the wild, wandering thoughts of His poor servant captive. He will bring a rich harvest of blessing out of his bitter experiences.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Wild — "Reem" means a wild ox, not a one-horned creature. Its mark is strength no one can tame.

- Rising — Goat, donkey, wild ox: God climbs a scale, each animal further beyond Job's reach than the last.

- Useless — Its power is greater than any plough ox's. Yet no man can borrow it.

- Bounded — Adam's rule over the creatures was real, but limited. God kept some animals outside it, and never asked Job to manage them.

- Yielded — What refuses every human hand yields to One. That is the humbling, and it is also Job's comfort: the same hand tames the wild powers set against him.

Job 39:10 · Darby

Canst thou bind the buffalo with his cord in the furrow? or will he harrow the valleys after thee?

God answers Job out of the whirlwind with a long series of questions about the animals. Here He points to one beast that has never pulled a plough. The challenge is simple. Job cannot make this creature work a field for him. How then can he sit in judgment on the God who made it?

Which Animal Is Meant

Older translations call this animal a "unicorn." One writer tests that older name against what Scripture actually says.

Nothing in Scripture suggests that the animal had only one horn. In fact Deuteronomy 33:17 speaks of "the horns of a unicorn" in the older wording, and it must have been an animal the Israelites knew well. Its great strength and untameable nature are the main features. Man cannot use it for farm work as he uses the tame ox.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Another writer names the creature and shows where it stands among the animals God lists.

There is only one animal with a single horn, the Indian rhinoceros, found only in Southern Asia, but here it should be the wild ox. We have the wild goat (v. 1), the wild donkey (v. 5), and now the wild ox (v. 9). They follow one another in order. This is a more powerful animal than either of the others. There is a rising in the scale.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strength Man Cannot Use

The sting of the question is not that the animal is weak. Its strength is real, and useless to Job.

The wild ox is understood to be a large antelope that cannot be tamed. Could Job make it plod along a furrow, pulling a plough as oxen were taught to do? (v. 10). The strength of the antelope was more than enough for this, but how could man make use of such strength? Could he trust such an animal to bring home grain from the field? (v. 12). Of course the answer to all these questions is no. But this teaches us that God's creation holds much variety that man cannot even understand. It shows up man's limits against God's unlimited resources.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Who Assigned the Yoke

Some animals carry man's loads. Others never will. God, not man, settled which is which.

Whatever men think or say, neither Job nor anyone else can put the wild ox to man's ordinary work. No one can make it submit quietly to his control or care. Its strength might be priceless. But God made all things, and He gave Adam rule over fish and birds, cattle, every creeping thing, and all the earth. He did not tie the wild ox to the furrow with a rope. He did not make it harrow behind Job. He did not ask Job to hand the labours of the field over to it, at the beginning or at the end.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God Asks at All

These are not riddles about farming or zoology. They ask who Job is next to the God who made these creatures.

In the material world God proves Job ignorant of the origin of any of His works. Now in Job 39 He requires Job to think about how unable he is to rule over the animal world. Whether it is the unicorn, the horse, or the eagle, each and all are stronger than Job. How much more should He who created them and gave them their qualities command Job's reverence and fear!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Hidden Comfort

There is mercy inside the rebuke. The nature that yields to no man still yields to its Maker.

Will the wild ox plough and carry the burdens of daily labour like the tame ox? That wild, untamed nature yields to One only. Can Job doubt that He will control all things, even the wild powers of evil, and make them the obedient servants of His will? So God will bring the wild and wandering thoughts of His poor servant into captivity. He will bring a rich harvest of blessing out of his bitter experiences.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Wild, not one-horned. Scripture never gives this creature a single horn. Its marks are great strength and a nature no man can tame.

- Strength without service. Its power is real and worth having, yet Job cannot rope it, cannot make it harrow, cannot trust it to carry a harvest home.

- A rising scale. Goat, then wild donkey, then wild ox — each step puts a stronger creature further out of Job's reach.

- The yoke is God's to give. He assigned some animals to serve man and left others free; Job never had the say in that, at the beginning or at the end.

- Humbled, then harvested. The questions leave Job in reverence before his Maker. The One who alone masters the untameable can master Job's wandering thoughts too, and bring blessing out of his bitterness.

Job 39:11 · Darby

Wilt thou put confidence in him, because his strength is great? and wilt thou leave thy labour to him?

God's questions to Job climb from the wild goat to the wild ass, and now to an animal far stronger. Job had argued with God, and now God asks him: would you trust that strength enough to leave your farm work to it?

Place in the sequence

The animals in this chapter come in a deliberate order, each stronger than the last:

So we have had the wild goats, and then the wild ass; and now what is called here a "unicorn." I do not know why it is called that… but here it should be the wild ox. We have the wild goat (v. 1), the wild ass (v. 5), and now the wild ox (v. 9). They follow one another in rotation. This is a more powerful animal than either of the others. There is a rising in the scale.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The animal behind the name

Older Bibles call this animal a "unicorn". The Hebrew word behind that name points to a real animal, one Israel knew well. Its two marks are the two this verse raises: great strength, and a refusal to be handled:

The Hebrew word is reem… There is nothing in the Scripture to suggest that the animal had only one horn; indeed Deuteronomy 33:17 speaks of "the horns of a unicorn"… and it must have been some animal the Israelites knew well. Its main characteristics are great strength and a nature no one can tame: unlike the tame ox, it cannot serve on a farm.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Strength God never gave to man

Job could not answer yes. God never assigned this creature to human service, even though He gave Adam dominion at the beginning:

Whatever people think or say, neither Job nor anyone else can pretend to put the wild ox to man's ordinary work. No one can make it submit quietly to his control or care. Its strength might be priceless. But God made everything, and He gave Adam dominion over fish and birds, cattle, every reptile, and all the earth. Even so, He did not bind the wild ox with Job's rope in the furrow, or set it to harrow behind him. He never asked Job to leave the work of the field to this animal, at the beginning or at the end.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God Himself drew the line between working animals and free ones:

He, not man, has made them what they are, and ordered their habits and their dwellings. He has given some animals to carry man's burdens. Others He has left free from any such service, like the wild ass, with its house in the desert and its home on the open plain.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From the creature to the Creator

The chapter is an argument, not a nature tour. God makes Job measure himself against animals he cannot govern, and then against the One who made them:

In the material world God proves that Job cannot explain how any of His works began. Now in Job 39 God makes him consider how unable he is to rule the animal world. Whether it is the unicorn, the horse, or the eagle, each and all are superior to Job in strength. How much more should He who created them and gave them their qualities command Job's reverence and fear!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same questions expose the gap between what man can manage and what God holds in hand:

The wild ox is understood to be a large antelope that no one can tame. Could Job make it plod in a furrow, pulling a plough, as oxen were taught to do? Its strength was more than enough for this, but how could man make use of such strength? Could he trust such an animal to bring home grain from the field? Of course the answer to all these questions is no, but this teaches us that there is much variety in God's creation that man cannot even understand, and it shows up man's limitations against God's unlimited resources.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The comfort hidden in the challenge

The questions humble Job, yet they also carry a promise. What no man can tame still answers to God — and that includes Job's own runaway thoughts:

That wild, untamed nature yields to only One. Can Job doubt that He will control all things? He will take even the wild powers of evil and make them the obedient servants of His will. So God will take captive the wild and wandering thoughts of His poor servant. He will bring a rich harvest of blessing out of his bitter experiences.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Power — the wild ox has great strength, and no one can tame it. It will not serve on a farm as a tame ox does.

- Permission — God never handed that strength to man. He gave Adam dominion, yet He keeps some animals as burden-bearers and leaves others free.

- Proportion — one animal already outmatches Job in strength. The Creator who gave it that strength deserves his reverence, not his arguments.

- Perspective — questions no man can answer expose his limits, and set them against God's unlimited resources.

- Promise — Job's own wandering thoughts yield to God as well. He brings a harvest of blessing out of bitter experience.

Job 39:12 · Darby

Wilt thou trust him to bring home thy seed, and gather it into thy threshing-floor?

This is God's last question to Job about one animal, the wild ox. Job had been judging how God runs the world, and here God asks whether Job could manage one animal.

The Animal in Question

Older translations call this creature a "unicorn." One writer doubts that name and sets the animal in its place in the sequence:

Now comes the creature called here a "unicorn." I do not know why anyone gave it that name. There is only one animal with a single horn: the Indian rhinoceros, found only in Southern Asia. But here it should be the wild ox. We have the wild goat (v. 1), the wild ass (v. 5), and now the wild ox (v. 9). They follow one another in turn. This is a more powerful animal than either of the others. There is a rising in the scale.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strength Without Usefulness

The animal is not weak. That is the problem — Job could never trust that strength with his harvest:

Could Job make it plod in a furrow, pulling a plough as oxen were taught to do? (v.10). The strength of the antelope was more than enough for this, but how could man make use of such strength? Could he trust such an animal to bring home grain from the field? (v.12). Of course the answer to all these questions is no. But it serves to teach us that God's creation holds much variety that is beyond man even to understand. It also shows up man's limits compared with God's unlimited resources.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Who Decides Which Creatures Serve

God gave Adam dominion over the animals, yet this one will not take the yoke. God chose it that way:

Whatever men think or say, no one — not Job, not anyone else — can claim to harness the wild ox for man's ordinary work. No one can make it submit quietly to his control or care. Its strength might be priceless. But God made all things. He gave Adam dominion over fish and bird, cattle, every reptile, and all the earth. Yet He did not tie the wild ox with a rope to the furrow, or make it harrow behind Job. He did not ask Job to leave the work of the field to this animal, either at the start or at the end.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer widens this to all creatures:

He, not man, has made them what they are, and ordered their habits and their homes. Some He has given to be the burden-bearers of man. Others He has set free from any such service, like the wild ass, whose home is the desert and the open plain.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God Asks at All

The questions have a target, and the target is Job's view of himself:

But what is the aim of the Lord in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man, and to humble man. It is to bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needs, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The wild ox is a small thing beside the sea and the stars, and that is just the point:

So it matters little whether we gaze at the greatest of God's works, or look into the least. Everywhere we meet what is entirely beyond man's understanding… Job had even presumed to judge the moral depths of God. But he could not face what God is in the least part of His universe, and he had not the slightest adequate idea of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Job's Own Harvest

What Job cannot do with a wild animal, God is doing with Job:

That wild, untamed nature yields only to One. Can Job doubt that He will control all things, even the wild powers of evil? Will He not make them the obedient servants of His will? So God will take captive the wild and wandering thoughts of His poor servant. He will bring a rich harvest of blessing out of his bitter experiences.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Wild ox. The "unicorn" of older versions is the wild ox. It comes third in a rising scale of strength, after the wild goat and the wild ass.

- Untamed. Its power is real. But no man can bind it to a furrow or trust it to carry grain home. God's creation holds strength that man cannot use.

- Assigned. God, not man, decided which animals bear burdens and which go free — service and freedom are both His to give.

- Humbling. God aims the question at Job's pride. Job had judged God's moral ways, yet he could not master the smallest part of God's world.

- Harvest. The One who tames the untamable is taming Job's wandering thoughts. He will bring a rich harvest out of Job's suffering.

Job 39:13 · Darby

The wing of the ostrich beats joyously -- But is it the stork's pinion and plumage?

Job has demanded a hearing with God; God answers by taking him on a tour of creatures he never made and cannot manage. The ostrich is one of the strangest exhibits: a bird with wings that cannot fly, and a mother who leaves her eggs in the dust.

Which Bird Is Meant

Older English Bibles put a peacock in this verse. Commentators agree this is a mistake. The reason is as much history as language.

The Authorised Version is far from a correct representation. The peacock seems to have been first known, even to Israel, in the days of Solomon, and the name is an Indian word turned into Hebrew. It is the ostrich which is really in the first clause, contrasted with the stork in the second. "The wing of the ostrich flaps joyously: but has she the stork's pinion and plumage?" ... Certainly the peacock is not meant here. The peacock is more striking for its splendid tail when spread out, and that does not enter into the description given. The ostrich, unlike the stork, has no power of flight. It runs at the greatest speed, and it has none of that parental fondness which marks the stork.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Hebrew words lie behind the verse. One of them names a cry.

notsah means "plumage," and it is translated ostrich in Job 39:13-18. Job 39:13, however, refers to the ostrich by the plural word renanim, which means "a crying or wailing." The Authorised Version translates that word "peacocks."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Set Against The Stork

The ESV above ends with "the pinions and plumage of love." The writers quoted here read that clause as naming the stork. The verse then turns on a comparison: one bird flaps in excitement, the other is known for what the first one lacks.

There is a contrast here between the ostrich and the stork. The ostrich makes a great fluttering, and it is also stupidly indifferent to its young. The stork is the most affectionate bird that God created. No other bird has such great care for its offspring.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What The Wings Are Not For

Her wings never lift her off the ground. The passage goes on to show what she does with her eggs.

The ostrich is another most interesting creature of God. It is a bird, but not a flying bird. It uses its wings only to help it run at a fast rate. Also, unlike other birds, she makes no comfortable nest to lay her eggs in and hide them from predators. She leaves them in the ground and warms them in the dust, in places where beasts or men may walk. She does not consider that these eggs can easily be broken.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Wisdom Given, Wisdom Withheld

The passage does not blame the bird. It traces her behaviour back to God, who takes the sense away.

God gives one bird its remarkable character of affection. From another bird He takes away even the most basic sense — a bird of immense power and great speed, so fast that an ostrich could outrun a racehorse for a while.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The strange bird carries a lesson for Job himself.

Job was to learn from the ostrich that God does not do what man might naturally expect, nor does God need to give us His reasons.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Who Keeps The Eggs?

The neglect leaves a question hanging. The eggs lie in the open, yet the young birds still live.

Here is a creature that God Himself has apparently deprived of the ordinary instincts of a mother. Yet Someone — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From Birds To A Man's Heart

Job's complaint was never about ostriches. It was about how God was handling him. The bird is an argument from the smaller case to the greater.

He dwells on two things in particular — His supremacy, and also His power, joined with the most tender care... In fact, Job was laid low on every point. A sense of his own ignorance overwhelmed him in every possible way. He had been presumptuous in talking about the far more wonderful ways of a God who deals with a man's heart, soul and circumstances now... It was God showing His majesty, power, wisdom and goodness in outward things. If that were true of God, how much more in spiritual things?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Bird — the creature is the ostrich, not the peacock. The peacock reached Israel only in Solomon's day, and its name came from India.

- Contrast — the verse sets the flapping ostrich against the stork, the most affectionate of birds. She has none of the stork's pinion and plumage.

- Withheld — she leaves her eggs in the dust, where a passing foot could break them. God took even basic sense away from her.

- Sovereign — the same God who gives one bird deep affection withholds sense from another, and gives her speed that outruns a racehorse. He owes us no reasons.

- Kept — the brood survives anyway, cared for by Someone Job never thanked. If God's hand is that steady over birds, Job's own case is safe in it.

Job 39:14 · Darby

For she leaveth her eggs to the earth, and warmeth them in the dust,

The ostrich is one exhibit in a long parade of creatures God sets before Job, a suffering man who wanted answers. She buries her eggs in the dust and walks away. Why would the Creator make a mother like that?

What the Verse Describes

One commentator describes a bird that does the opposite of what nesting birds do:

The ostrich is another most interesting creature of God — a bird, but not a flying bird, using its wings only to help it run at a fast rate. Also, unlike other birds, she makes no comfortable nest to lay her eggs in and hide them from predators. She leaves them in the ground and warms them in the dust, in places where animals or people may walk. She does not consider the danger: these eggs break easily.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Stork in the Background

The verse begins with "For," tying it to the wing mentioned just before. Translations of that earlier line differ, and commentators read it as a contrast between two birds:

There is nothing here about peacocks at all. It is a mistake. It should read, "The wing of the ostrich waves joyously; is it the pinion and plumage of the stork?" The first part of the verse is about the ostrich, and the second part about the stork. The ostrich, with its great fluttering and its stupid indifference to its young, stands in contrast to the stork. The stork is the most affectionate bird that God created. No bird has such great care for its offspring.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer says where that difference comes from:

And who is to dispute with God? The God who gives one bird its remarkable character of affection takes the commonest sense away from another bird of immense power and great swiftness. An ostrich could outrun a racehorse for a while.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Observers Have Found

Critics have long said the description is inaccurate. Commentators differ on how much of the bird's behaviour is real neglect and how much observers misread. One note explains the bird's name and records what watchers have found:

In the previous verse the ostrich is named by a word that means "a crying or wailing." The ostrich leaves its eggs in the sand, well covered up. The sun keeps them warm by day, and the parent sits upon them at night. The bird leaves other eggs unprotected nearby, to feed the young birds when they hatch, and these may be trampled on. As for the parents' indifference to their young, people say that when a hunter comes near, the birds leave their nests and often cannot find the place again in the wide desert. But dead jackals have been found near the nests, killed by the parent birds.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Another writer answers the critics by asking who is speaking here:

It would be amusing, if it were not so sad, when critics declare that the author of "the poem" made a mistake about the eggs of the ostrich. But it is not an "author" who speaks. It is the Creator Himself, and He knows more about His creatures than all the "scientists" in the world.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Someone Still Cares for the Eggs

The eggs left in the dust are not left unwatched. One commentator puts the point as a question:

All things, however wild and seemingly senseless, are His creatures, and He does not forget them. Here is a creature that God Himself seems to have deprived of the ordinary mother's instincts. Yet some One — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Only Fitting Response

Job had been arguing with God's handling of his life. The ostrich is a creature man cannot account for. One writer draws the response that fits:

As to the ostrich, let its wing speed ever so joyously, God is still sovereign here, whatever man may reason… But this is not without God, who takes in more than man can grasp. Let man then mark, learn, and worship, and not set up to judge God or to murmur.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Argument Aimed at Job

The whole tour of wild creatures is building to one point about Job himself:

It is significant that the series opens and closes with mention of beasts and birds of prey. They might seem worthless, or even harmful, and yet He cares for them with unerring wisdom. Shall He fail to watch over His child who knows and trusts Him?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Contrast. The stork guards its young. The ostrich leaves hers in the dust. The difference is God's doing, not the birds'.

- Sovereignty. God gave one bird tender care. He withheld ordinary sense from another. He gives no reasons.

- Care. The eggs lie unguarded, yet they hatch. Someone is watching over a brood their own mother forgot.

- Worship. The honest response to a creature you cannot explain is to mark, learn, and worship, not to argue with the One who made it.

- Comfort. If God cares even for creatures that look worthless, the child who trusts Him will not be the one He overlooks.

Job 39:15 · Darby

And forgetteth that the foot may crush them, or that the beast of the field may trample them.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Job 39:16 · Darby

She is hardened against her young ones, as though they were not hers; her labour is in vain, without her concern.

God answers Job by pointing him to the ostrich. She leaves her eggs in the sand and treats her chicks as if they were not hers — and the verse asks what such a bird says about the God who made her.

A mother without a mother's instinct

The ostrich breaks the pattern we see in almost every other mother. One commentator ties her harshness and its cause into a single lesson for Job:

She also treats her young harshly, as though they were not hers (v.16). How unlike most mother birds or animals! Why is this so? "Because God deprived her of wisdom, and did not endow her with understanding" (v.17). Sad to say, some human mothers act like the ostrich in this matter, but it is abnormal. But Job was to learn from the ostrich that God does not do what man might naturally expect. He does not need to give us His reasons.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The contrast God draws

God does not show Job the ostrich on her own. He sets her beside a bird that loves its young:

The ostrich, on the contrary, leaves its young to get through as best they can. She leaves her eggs out in the sand, to come to maturity there or to be destroyed. She does not care about them... And who is to dispute with God? God gives one bird its remarkable character of affection. From another bird He takes away the commonest sense — a bird of immense power and great swiftness, able to outrun a racehorse for a while.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two birds, one Maker, opposite natures.

A disputed passage

Readers differ over what this verse describes. Reports about the bird itself add to the puzzle:

The passage speaks of the ostrich leaving her eggs unprotected and hardening herself against her young. The ostrich leaves its eggs in the sand, well covered up. The sun keeps them warm by day, and the parent sits on them at night. She leaves other eggs unprotected nearby as food for the chicks when they hatch, and these may get trampled. As to the indifference of the parents to their young, reports say that when a hunter approaches, they leave their nests. Often they cannot find the place again in the wide desert. Yet people have found dead jackals near the nests, killed by the parent birds. Some suppose that Job 39:16 refers to other birds laying eggs in the ostrich's nest, so that the chicks which hatch are "not hers."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Care for the helpless brood

The mother does not care for her chicks. Yet they live, and that raises a question:

All things, however wild and senseless they seem, are His creatures, and He does not forget them... Here is a creature God Himself seems to have deprived of the ordinary mother's instincts. Yet some One — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The ostrich as a warning picture

Scripture later uses this bird as the lowest measure of human cruelty. When Jerusalem fell, the prophet compared its mothers to her:

No wonder the Chaldean enemy was bitter in reproach and cruel in punishment. But, sad to say, the chosen nation's cup of indignity was not full until they themselves turned the most bitter of all against their own kin, out of sheer want and misery. "Even jackals offer the breast; they nurse their young; but the daughter of my people has become cruel, like the ostriches in the wilderness."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The response God is after

God never explains the ostrich to Job. One writer names the response that fits:

But this is not without God. He takes in more than man can grasp, and it pleases Him, of His own will and wisdom, to deprive the ostrich of wisdom. Yet He has also given her a swiftness that mocks the swiftest horse with its rider. Let man then mark, learn, and worship, and not set himself up to judge God or to murmur. That would be folly more guilty than the desert racer's, as well as irreverence and rebellion.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Made so. Her hardness toward her young is no accident. God withheld wisdom from her by His own choice.

- Not explained. God tells Job what He did, never why. He "does not do what man might naturally expect," and owes us no reasons.

- Not uniform. The same Maker gave one bird remarkable affection and gave this one none. He gave her speed instead, enough to outrun a racehorse.

- Not forgotten. Though the mother fails, the brood survives; someone still feeds what no parent guards.

- Not ours to judge. The right answer to a creature we cannot explain is worship, not complaint.

Job 39:17 · Darby

For +God hath deprived her of wisdom, and hath not furnished her with understanding.

God questions Job about the ostrich for six verses, and this line explains why she acts as she does. Why would God leave one of His own creatures without wisdom, and what was a suffering man meant to learn from it?

The bird in question

Older English Bibles read "peacocks" in verse 13. The Hebrew points to the ostrich instead, and sets her beside the stork:

The word notsah means "plumage," and it is translated ostrich in Job 39:13-18. But Job 39:13 calls the ostrich renanim, a plural word meaning "a crying or wailing." The King James Version translates it "peacocks." The passage is obscure. Job 39:13 may be better translated: "The wing of the ostrich beats joyously: but is it the stork's pinion and plumage?" The passage then speaks of the ostrich leaving its eggs unprotected, and being hard toward its young.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A nest left in the dust

Why does she act this way? The verse gives the reason, and the wording varies between translations: some say God "deprived her of wisdom," the ESV says He "made her forget wisdom."

Also, she treats her young harshly, as though they were not hers (v.16). How unlike most mother birds or animals! Why is this so? "Because God deprived her of wisdom, and did not endow her with understanding" (v.17). Sad to say, some human mothers act like the ostrich in this matter, but it is abnormal. But Job was to learn from the ostrich that God does not do what man might naturally expect. Nor does God need to give us His reasons.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Wisdom withheld by design

Two birds stand side by side in the chapter. One was given a mother's affection; the ostrich was not. The same hand made both:

And who is to dispute with God? The God that gives one bird its remarkable character of affection takes away the commonest sense even from another bird of immense power and great swiftness, so that an ostrich could outrun a racehorse for a while — "she scorns the horse and his rider."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So what is a man supposed to do with a God who works like this?

But this is not without God, who takes in more than man can grasp. So let man take note, learn, and worship. Let him not set himself up to judge God or to grumble. That would be folly more guilty than the desert racer's own, and irreverence and rebellion besides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The brood still cared for

The ostrich is not the only wild creature in the chapter. Set her among the rest, and what she lacks points to Someone who does not lack it:

All things, however wild and seemingly senseless, are His creatures, and He has not forgotten them. Here is another one: the ostrich of the desert. Her wings vibrate as she races with the speed of the wind… Here is a creature whom God Himself seems to have deprived of the ordinary motherly instincts. Yet Someone — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

If the helpless brood is still cared for, then care does not depend on the carer we can see. Job's case looked the same: left alone to all appearances, yet never outside God's keeping.

What Job was meant to learn

All these questions about creatures had one target — Job himself:

Who is it? — was it you, Job, that managed all these things? Was it you that cared for them all, provided for them all? Were you born when they began? In fact, Job was laid low on every point. The sense of his own ignorance and presumption overwhelmed him in every possible way. He had been talking about the far more wonderful ways of a God who deals with a man's heart, a man's soul, a man's circumstances now… It was God showing His majesty, power, wisdom and goodness in outward things. If that were true of God, how much more in spiritual things?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Withheld. The ostrich neglects her eggs and is hard toward her young. God kept wisdom and understanding from her. The verse names this as His act, not an accident of nature.

- Balanced. What He withholds in one place He supplies in another: the same bird that lacks common sense can outrun a horse.

- Compared. One bird gets a mother's affection; the ostrich gets none. God makes one creature unlike another, and no one may dispute it.

- Covered. Even the brood left in the dust survives — proof that God's care does not depend on the carer we can see.

- Silenced. Job had to draw the line upward. If God's wisdom and goodness reach a desert bird, they reach a man's heart and circumstances too. What God asks for is worship, not complaint.

Job 39:18 · Darby

What time she lasheth herself on high, she scorneth the horse and his rider.

This verse ends God's picture of the ostrich — a bird with no ordinary sense, yet fast enough to outrun the best horse. Job had demanded answers from God, and God points him instead to a creature no man would have designed.

A bird built to run

These verses are hard to translate. A reference work explains what the last line records:

The passage is obscure... Job 39:18 refers to the speed of the bird, which has often exceeded that of the best horses.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

One writer describes the bird behind that speed:

The ostrich is another most interesting creature of God. It is a bird, but not a flying bird. It uses its wings only to help it run fast.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

One thing withheld, another given

God has just said He took wisdom from her. Now He shows what He gave her instead. Where the ESV says she "laughs at" the horse, the older wording quoted below is "scorns."

The ostrich, by contrast, leaves its young to get through as best they can. It leaves its eggs exposed in the sand, to grow or to be destroyed. She does not care about them... "because God has deprived her of wisdom." And who is to dispute with God? The God who gives one bird its remarkable affection takes the commonest sense away from another bird of immense power and great speed. So an ostrich could outrun a racehorse for a while — "she scorns the horse and his rider."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No reasons offered

Job wanted God to explain Himself. Here he gets a fact instead of a reason.

But Job was to learn from the ostrich that God does not do what man expects. God does not need to give us His reasons. The speed of the ostrich also is amazing, far exceeding the speed of a horse (v.18). Why? Because God chose to make it this way.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The brood that survives anyway

She leaves her eggs in the dust and treats her young as strangers.

Here is a creature that God Himself seems to have deprived of the ordinary instincts of a mother. Yet some One — Who? — cares for the helpless brood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same question runs through God's whole tour of the animals here.

Does he see that prowling lioness? Who gives it food for its young? Who listens to the hungry croak of the raven? Who preserves the brilliant but stupid ostrich, the prancing battle-horse? Who guides the eagle, the king of birds, with its home high above? There is but one answer.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Job is asked to do with it

The right response is not to analyse God but to worship Him.

But this is not without God. He takes in more than man can grasp. Of His own will and wisdom, He is pleased to deprive the ostrich of wisdom. Yet He has also given her a swiftness which mocks the swiftest horse with its rider. Let man then mark, learn, and worship, and not set up to judge God or to murmur. This would be folly more guilty than that of the racer of the desert, as well as irreverence and rebellion.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From bird to battle horse

Speed is also the hinge to the next creature in the chapter.

The swiftness of the ostrich leads naturally to the next creature. Jehovah passes to the horse — swiftness, strength and grace in one body — and above all to the war-horse... What part has Job had in designing and creating so remarkable a creature?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

And the whole argument was never about birds.

It was God showing His majesty, power, wisdom and goodness in outward things. If that were true of God, how much more in spiritual things? And this is the great lesson of the Book that Job had to apply.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Withheld. God took wisdom from one bird, while giving another bird its remarkable affection.

- Given. In its place He put a speed that leaves the best horse and its rider behind, because He chose to make her that way.

- Unexplained. Job learns that God does not act as man expects and owes no reasons for how He shares out His gifts.

- Sustained. Even the brood left in the dust survives, because one Hand cares for what the parent neglects.

- Answered. God shows this power and care in outward things. Job can trust the same hands with his own soul, and worship instead of argue.

Job 39:19 · Darby

Hast thou given strength to the horse? hast thou clothed his neck with the quivering mane?

God has been questioning Job out of the whirlwind, from the foundations of the earth down to the wild animals. Now He points to the creature a man knows best — the horse — and asks who put that strength there and who dressed that neck.

A question, not a lesson

God's speech is a chain of questions Job cannot answer. This one aims at his pride, not at his knowledge of animals.

What have you to do with it? … It is a splendid description indeed, but it is all meant to overwhelm Job with the folly of pretending to talk about God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer states the aim of the entire series of questions:

To show that God is greater than man and to humble man, to bring Job to the needed true knowledge of himself and to deliver him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Strength clothed in beauty

Older translations read "clothed his neck with thunder." The ESV has "clothe his neck with a mane." Commentators picture the same thing: a mane that quivers as the horse moves. Power and beauty arrive together.

Job is asked if he has given strength to the horse, and combined it with the grace and beauty expressed by his flowing mane. His prancing is as agile as the grasshopper. His neighing and shrill snorting strike terror to the heart… Here is a beast that is not exactly wild, yet it has all the strength and swiftness of the wildest. What part has Job had in devising and creating so remarkable a creature?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the horse, of all creatures

The animals before this one are creatures a man watches from a distance. The horse is the one he owns and prizes, and that is why the question stings.

Here He comes down to where we might be disposed to think ourselves at home. Other animals may be strange and distant. Man, and the Arab above all, might imagine he has some right to speak about what he most loves to use for work or ease, for pride or love. But what had he to do with giving the horse its might or fluttering mane? its locust-like bound? the glory of its snorting, a terror to others?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The wrong thing to trust

The horse's strength is God's gift, so it can never take God's place. God's people needed that warning.

God warned His people not to put their trust in this mighty agent of war: "The war horse is a false hope for salvation." … It is He who "has triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider He has thrown into the sea" (Exodus 15:1). Jehovah is infinitely exalted above all His creatures. Let Job remember how small he too is, and humble himself before Him who is God over all. His deliverance must come, not from horses, but from the Lord on high.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Israel's law made the same point.

Horses were forbidden to Israel (Deuteronomy 17:16), and they were brought from Egypt. In Scripture the horse stands for strength (Job 39:19; Psalm 147:10), swiftness (Jeremiah 4:13; Habakkuk 1:8), fearlessness (Job 39:18; Jeremiah 8:6), majesty (Esther 6:8), and strength in the battle.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Where real power comes from

The horse stands for power. One writer uses that picture to ask why Christians show so little of it.

The horse is a symbol of power… Now the Holy Spirit is given that the believer may have power. Our Lord told the disciples to wait for the promise of the Father — "until you are clothed with power from on high." Why are Christians so little marked by power? We fear Christians do not judge the flesh on the one side, or walk in the Spirit on the other. Do both, and there will be power.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — God handed the horse its strength. The horse never earned it, and Job never supplied it.

- Clothed — God dressed that neck with a quivering mane. He joins beauty to force, so His strength is never brute force alone.

- Near — God picks the animal man prizes and handles most. The question lands where Job felt sure of himself.

- Trusted — the strength is God's gift, so leaning on it is folly. Deliverance comes from the Lord, not from horses.

- Received — no one can manufacture this strength. It must be received, and so Christ told His disciples to wait for power from on high.

Job 39:20 · Darby

Dost thou make him to leap as a locust? His majestic snorting is terrible.

God's questions from the whirlwind have moved from one creature to the next, and now they reach the animal Job knew best — the war horse. He asks who gave it that leap and that terrifying snort.

What the Words Describe

The picture is a horse ready for battle. One commentator walks through the details — strength, mane, leap and snort — and asks who supplied them:

Jehovah moves on naturally from the swiftness of the ostrich to the horse. The horse is a picture of swiftness, strength and grace, and here it is the war horse above all. Job is asked if he has given strength to the horse, and joined it to the grace and beauty of his flowing mane. His prancing is as nimble as a grasshopper's. His neighing and shrill snorting strike terror into the heart... What part has Job had in devising and creating so remarkable a creature?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Older translations read the first line as making the horse "afraid as a grasshopper." The ESV instead pictures a leap like the locust's.

Why God Chose the Horse

The other creatures are strange and distant. This one man had tamed and taken pride in, and that is why the question lands so hard.

From this Jehovah turns to the war horse. He describes it in a way worthy of Him who spoke. The impression is all the more vivid, because here He comes down to ground where we might think ourselves at home. Other animals might be more or less strange and distant. Man, and the Arab above all, might imagine he had some right to speak of what he most loves — to use for work or for ease, for pride or affection. But what had he to do with giving the horse its might or its fluttering mane? its locust-like bound? the glory of its snorting, a terror to others?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strength Man Could Never Have Invented

A horse obeys its rider, yet none of its courage comes from the rider. Man can tame such a creature; he could never have thought it up.

The Lord now turns to the horse. It is a tame animal, very strong and remarkably fearless, yet controlled by its rider. Had Job given such strength to this amazing creature? (v.19). Or could he frighten him? (v.20)... He does not shy away from danger, but rushes right into it... Again, this is another creature that man would not have thought of creating, especially any man who loves peace. Job meets it as one more object lesson, telling him that God is greater than Job.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Power Never Meant to Be Trusted

The animal that terrifies an enemy is the wrong place to rest your hope.

The horse, especially in the days our book speaks of, and in the East, was used mainly in war. God warned His people not to put their trust in this mighty instrument of war: "The war horse is a false hope for salvation." "Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God" (Ps. 20:7). It is He who "has triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider He has thrown into the sea" (Ex. 15:1). Jehovah is infinitely exalted above all His creatures. Let Job remember how small he too is, and humble himself before Him who is God over all. His deliverance must come, not from horses, but from the Lord on high.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Aim of the Question

The magnificence of the description is not the point. God aims it at a man who had been talking about Him beyond his knowledge.

Now He comes to the horse itself, and the war horse in particular... "Can you make him leap like the locust? His majestic snorting is terrifying" (vv. 19–25). Well, it is a splendid description indeed. But it is all meant to overwhelm Job with the folly of pretending to talk about God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the Believer Finds Power

One writer applies the picture to the Christian, whose power must also come from outside himself.

The horse is a symbol of power... Now the Holy Spirit is given that the believer may have power. Our Lord told the disciples to wait for the promise of the Father — "until you are clothed with power from on high." Why are Christians so little marked by power?

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not gained — the leap and the snort are strength God gave. Job could not create the horse or frighten it.

- Given at home — God picks the one creature man tames and boasts in. Even there, nothing starts with man.

- Given, so unmatched — no peace-loving man would have dreamed up a horse that charges into danger.

- Given, so not to be trusted — Scripture calls the war horse a false hope. Deliverance comes from the Lord, not from strength.

- Given, so be humbled — all this splendour is meant to silence a man who talked about God beyond his knowledge.

Job 39:21 · Darby

He paweth in the valley, and rejoiceth in [his] strength; he goeth forth to meet the armed host.

God answers Job by walking him through one creature after another — the lion, the wild ass, the ostrich, and now a war horse straining to charge. Why answer a man's hard questions about his own life with an animal that runs toward battle?

The Parade of Creatures

The horse does not stand alone. It is one in a line of creatures God sets before Job.

Jehovah has shown the wonders of lifeless creation above, beneath, and around. Now He turns to the animal kingdom. The lion, the raven, the wild goat or ibex, the wild ass, the wild ox, the ostrich, the horse, the hawk, and the eagle appear one after another. They are there to convince the man who ventures to sit in judgment on God's doings of his own ignorance and powerlessness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Familiar Ground

The earlier creatures were distant and wild. The horse is the one animal a man owns and uses — which is why God picks it.

From this Jehovah turns to the war-horse. He describes it in a way worthy of Him who spoke. The impression is all the more vivid, because here He comes down to ground where we might be inclined to think ourselves at home. Other animals might be more or less strange and distant. Man, and Arab man above all, might think he had some right to speak of what he most loves to use for work or comfort, for pride or affection. But what had he to do with giving the horse its might or its fluttering mane? its locust-like bound? the glory of its snorting, a terror to others? its pawing, impatient of restraint, and exulting in its strength? or its fearless advance, no matter what the clang or the flash of arms?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Straight at the Danger

The pawing in the valley belongs to an animal that runs toward danger instead of away from it.

The Lord now turns to consider the horse. It is a tame animal, with great strength and no fear at all, yet controlled by his rider. Had Job given such strength to this amazing creature? (v.19). Or could he frighten him? (v.20). It is a war horse particularly in this case, an animal that "goes out to meet the weapons" (v.21). He does not shy away from danger, but rushes right into it. Swordsmen opposing him do not slow him down (v.22)... Though he is not a wild animal, when engaged in war, he seems to have the qualities of the wildest of animals.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

That raises a question: who would ever design a creature like this?

Again, this is another creature that man would not have thought of creating — least of all a man who loved peace. It is one more object lesson for Job, to tell him God is greater than Job.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Strength No One May Lean On

The horse's strength is real. God still told His people not to lean on it.

In the days our book speaks of, and in the East, the horse was mainly an animal of war. God warned His people not to trust this mighty instrument of war. "The war horse is a false hope for salvation." "Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God" (Ps. 20:7)... So infinitely exalted is Jehovah above all His creatures. Let Job remember how small he too is, and humble himself before Him who is God over all. His deliverance must come, not from horses, but from the Lord on high.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Point of the Portrait

The beauty of the description is not the goal. The goal is a man with nothing left to say.

Now He comes to the horse itself; and the war horse in particular... What have you to do with it?... Well, it is a splendid description indeed, but it is all for the purpose of overwhelming Job with the folly of his pretending to talk about God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What God displays in horses and eagles is meant to be carried over into something far weightier.

In fact, Job was laid low on every point. In every possible way he was overwhelmed with the sense of his own ignorance and presumption. He had been talking about the far more wonderful ways of a God who deals with a man's heart, man's soul, man's circumstances now... It was God showing His majesty, power, wisdom and goodness in outward things. If that were true of God, how much more in spiritual things?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Power for the Believer

One writer takes the charging horse as a picture of a power the Christian is meant to know.

The horse is a symbol of power. Read the graphic description of the horse by the Lord in Job 39:19-25... Now the Holy Spirit is given that the believer may have power. The disciples were told by our Lord to wait for the promise of the Father — "until you are clothed with power from on high." Why are Christians so little marked by power? We are afraid... the way is not made plain... in other words, on the one side to judge the flesh, on the other to walk in the Spirit. Then there will be power.

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not earned. The horse's strength and courage come from God. Job did not give them, and no rider can.

- Chosen on purpose. God picks the one animal man tames, so the lesson lands on familiar ground, not out in the far desert.

- Fearless by design. It runs at the danger it should flee — a creature no peace-loving man would have invented.

- Never a refuge. Real strength is still a false hope for salvation. Deliverance comes from the Lord, not from horses.

- Silence, then trust. God's wisdom and goodness show like this in outward things. How much more in His dealings with a human heart.

Job 39:22 · Darby

He laugheth at fear, and is not affrighted; neither turneth he back from before the sword.

God has been putting question after question to Job. At this point the subject is the war horse, an animal that runs at armed men instead of away from them. The question underneath the picture is simple: who put that courage there, and what claim does Job have on it?

Why God Points at a Horse

The horse section is not a nature lesson for its own sake. God is answering a man who had talked about His ways as though he understood them.

Now He comes to the horse itself, and the war horse in particular. "Have you given the horse strength? Have you clothed his neck with thunder?" What have you to do with it? … It is a splendid description indeed, but it is all for the purpose of overwhelming Job with the folly of his pretending to talk about God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fearlessness That Runs Toward the Danger

The verse describes more than calm nerves. The horse does not just put up with the battle. It heads into it, and armed men in front of it change nothing. Yet all that force still answers to a rider.

The Lord now turns to the horse. It is a tame animal, very strong and remarkably fearless, yet controlled by its rider. In this case it is a war horse, an animal that charges into the clash of arms (v.21). He does not shy away from danger, but rushes right into it. Swordsmen opposing him do not slow him down (v.22).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The One Animal Man Thinks He Owns

Other creatures in these questions feel strange and distant. The horse does not. It is the animal a man would most readily claim as his own, and still he gave it nothing.

From this the LORD turns to the war horse. He describes it in a way worthy of Him who spoke. The impression is all the deeper, because here He comes down to where we might think ourselves at home. Other animals might be more or less strange and distant. But man, and the Arab above all, might think he has some right to speak about what he most loves to use — for work or ease, for pride or love. What did he have to do with giving the horse its might, or its fluttering mane? … Or its undismayed advance, no matter what the clang or the flash of weapons?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Design No Human Mind Would Have Produced

Left to himself, a man would never have thought up an animal that enjoys a battlefield. That is part of God's argument to Job.

Here is another creature that man would not have thought of creating, especially any man who loves peace. Job faces this as another object lesson, to tell him that God is greater than Job.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Strength Worth Admiring, Not Trusting

The same courage God praises here is the courage His people were warned never to lean on. Admiring the horse and trusting it are two different things.

The horse, especially in the days our book speaks of, and in the East, was chiefly used in war. God warned His people not to put their trust in this mighty instrument of war. "The war horse is a false hope for salvation." "Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God" (Psalm 20:7). … Let Job remember how small he too is, and humble himself before Him who is God over all. His deliverance must come, not from horses, but from the Lord on high.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where the Believer's Courage Comes From

The horse can also be read as a picture of power. If that is so, where does a Christian's own power come from?

The horse is a symbol of power. Read the striking description of the horse by the Lord in Job 39:19-25. … Now the Holy Spirit is given so that the believer may have power. Our Lord told the disciples to wait for the promise of the Father — "until you are clothed with power from on high." Why are Christians so little marked by power?

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not earned. God put this fearlessness into the horse. Job added nothing.

- Given closest to home. God chose the animal man feels most entitled to claim. Even there Job had no answer.

- Given beyond invention. No peace-loving man would invent a creature that runs into battle. God is greater than Job.

- Given, so not to be trusted. God warned His people not to lean on the very strength He praises. Deliverance comes from the Lord, not from horses.

- Given still today. If the horse pictures power, the believer's power is a gift too — the Holy Spirit, promised by the Father.

Job 39:23 · Darby

The quiver rattleth upon him, the glittering spear and the javelin.

God answers Job out of the storm, and His reply is a tour of the animal kingdom. Job wanted an explanation for his pain; he gets a war horse that charges at spears, and a question about who gave it that nerve.

The procession of creatures

The horse does not appear alone. It is one item in a sequence, and the sequence has a purpose.

From the wonders of creation without life — above, beneath, and around — Jehovah now turns to the animal kingdom. The lion, the raven, the wild goat or ibex, the wild ass, the wild ox, the ostrich, the horse, the hawk, and the eagle appear one after another. They come to convince the man who dares to sit in judgment on God's doings that he is ignorant and powerless.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Familiar ground

The other creatures are wild and distant. The horse lives alongside man, and that makes the lesson land harder.

From this Jehovah turns to the war horse, described in a way worthy of the One who spoke. This makes a more vivid impression, because here He comes down to where we might think ourselves at home. Other animals might be more or less strange and distant. A man, and an Arab man above all, might imagine he had some right to speak of the animal he most loves to use — for work or comfort, for pride or affection. But what had he to do with giving the horse its might, or its fluttering mane? its locust-like bound? the glory of its snorting, a terror to others? its pawing, impatient of restraint, and exulting in its strength? or its undismayed advance, no matter what the clang or the flash of arms?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Weapons that mean nothing

The verse names a quiver of arrows, a flashing spear, a javelin. None of it turns the horse back.

He does not shy away from danger, but rushes right into it. Swordsmen opposing him do not slow him down (v.22). The spear and the javelin mean nothing to him, but the clash of arms seems only to increase his fierceness and rage (v.24). Though he is not a wild animal, when engaged in war, he seems to have the qualities of the wildest of animals.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer points to the rider's gear beating against the horse's sides:

The arms and equipment of his rider clash against his sides as he rushes over the ground, "swallowing it" in his headlong speed... Here is a beast, not exactly wild, but given all the strength and swiftness of the wildest. What part has Job had in devising and creating so remarkable a creature?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Not a design man would have chosen

The comparison is not between Job and the horse, but between Job and God.

Again, this is another creature that man would not have thought of creating — especially any man who loved peace. Job meets it as another object lesson, telling him that God is greater than Job.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Strength on loan

The horse is fearless, but God gave it that nerve. So God told His people where not to look for safety:

The horse, especially in the days our book speaks of, and in the East, served mainly in war. God warned His people not to trust this mighty instrument of war: "The war horse is a vain hope for safety." "Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God" (Ps. 20:7)... So infinitely exalted is Jehovah above all His creatures. Let Job remember how small he too is, and humble himself before the God over all. His deliverance must come, not from horses, but from the Lord on high.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The believer's power

One writer reads the horse as a picture of power for Christians today.

The horse is a symbol of power. Read the graphic description of the horse by the Lord in Job 39:19-25... Now the Holy Spirit is given that the believer may have power. Our Lord told the disciples to wait for the promise of the Father — "until you are clothed with power from on high." Why are Christians so little marked by power?

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Given, not grown — God gave the war horse every trait it has, including its nerve under a rattling quiver. The verse asks where that came from.

- Given to a familiar creature — God picks the animal Job knew best. The one creature Job felt at home with turns out to be God's work.

- Given a courage man wouldn't invent — No lover of peace would design a beast that runs at spears. The design itself shows God is greater than Job.

- Given, so never trusted — The strength is lent, so leaning on it fails. Deliverance comes from the Lord, not from horses.

- Given still — The same pattern holds now. God gives the Holy Spirit so the believer may have power — which raises the question of why Christians show so little of it.

Job 39:24 · Darby

He swalloweth the ground with fierceness and rage, and cannot contain himself at the sound of the trumpet

God answers Job out of the storm. He points him to a war horse in full charge — a creature so wild with fury that no trumpet blast can settle it. The real question is not about horses. Who gave this animal its power? And what does that say about the man who has been arguing with its Maker?

The Creature Job Cannot Account For

God picks the horse on purpose. Of all the animals in this chapter, it is the one a man might feel he knows — until God asks him who put the fire in it.

From this Jehovah turns to the war-horse, and He describes it in a way worthy of Him who spoke. The picture strikes us all the more because here He comes down to ground where we might think ourselves at home. Other animals may seem strange and distant to us. But a man — an Arab above all — might think he has some right to speak about the creature he most loves to use, for work or comfort, for pride or affection. Yet what did he have to do with giving the horse its strength, or its fluttering mane? Its leap like a locust's? The glory of its snorting, a terror to others? … See how in its furious rage it seems to bite the ground. Nothing can hold it back when the trumpets sound.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Swallowing the Ground

The phrase describes speed, not appetite. The horse covers ground so fast that the earth disappears under him. The weapons around him do nothing to slow his charge.

Nothing can turn him from his onward dash to meet the charging hosts. The weapons and gear of his rider clash against his sides as he rushes over the ground, "swallowing it" in his headlong speed. Here is an animal that is not exactly wild, yet is given all the strength and speed of the wildest. What part did Job have in designing and creating such a remarkable creature?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

You might expect weapons and noise to stop him. They do the opposite.

The spear and the javelin mean nothing to him, but the clash of arms seems only to increase his fierceness and rage (v.24). He is not a wild animal, yet in war he seems to have the qualities of the wildest of animals. The sound of the trumpet does not stop him, but spurs him on (vv.24-25). As long as the noise and shouting of the battle goes on, he keeps advancing.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the Parade of Animals

The horse is not alone. God parades one creature after another in front of Job, and the list has a purpose.

The lion, the raven, the wild goat or ibex, the wild donkey, the wild ox, the ostrich, the horse, the hawk and the eagle appear one after another. They come to convince the man who dares to sit in judgment on God's doings that he is ignorant and powerless.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Kelly says plainly what the beauty of the description is for:

Well, it is a splendid description indeed, but it is all for the purpose of overwhelming Job with the folly of his pretending to talk about God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strength That Cannot Save

A creature this strong is still only a creature. Scripture warns against trusting it.

In the days our book speaks of, and in the East, the horse was used mainly for war. God warned His people not to put their trust in this mighty agent of war: "The war horse is a false hope for salvation." "Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the Lord our God" (Ps. 20:7). It is He who "has triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider He has thrown into the sea" (Ex. 15:1). Jehovah is exalted far above all His creatures. Let Job remember how small he is too, and humble himself before the One who is God over all. His deliverance must come, not from horses, but from the Lord on high.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

(Scripture here follows the ESV. Older versions read "The horse is a vain thing for safety" and "we will remember the name of the Lord our God.")

From Outward Power to Inward Lesson

The speech never names Job's real problem. It argues from the visible to the invisible and leaves him to draw the line.

In fact, God laid Job low at every point. In every possible way He overwhelmed him with the sense of his own ignorance, and of how bold he had been to talk about the far more wonderful ways of a God who deals with a man's heart, his soul, his circumstances now. The Lord does not express that last part. It was God showing His majesty, power, wisdom and goodness in outward things. If that were true of God, how much more in spiritual things?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer takes the same picture forward as an image of what believers lack and need:

The horse is a symbol of power… Now the Holy Spirit is given that the believer may have power. The disciples were told by our Lord to wait for the promise of the Father — "until you are clothed with power from on high." Why are Christians so little marked by power?

Modernised from A J PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Power given. The horse's fierceness and rage are not his own doing. God asks Job who gave the creature its strength, its mane, its leap and its terrifying snort.

- Power unstoppable. He swallows the ground in headlong speed. Spear and javelin only sharpen his fury. The trumpet that should stop him drives him on.

- Power borrowed. Strong as he is, he is still a creature. Scripture calls the war horse a false hope for salvation. Deliverance comes from the Lord, not from horses.

- Power that humbles. The whole parade of creatures is aimed at one man. It shows Job that he is ignorant and powerless, and in no place to sit in judgment on God's doings.

- Power applied. God shows His wisdom and goodness in a creature like this. How much more in His dealings with a man's heart? That was the lesson Job had to learn.

Job 39:25 · Darby

At the noise of the trumpets he saith, Aha! and he smelleth the battle afar off, the thunder of the captains, and the shouting.

God's questions about the horse end on a battlefield. The animal hears the trumpet, answers it, and catches the scent of war before it arrives. The picture is vivid. The question behind it is sharper: who put that fearlessness there, and what does that say about the God Job has been arguing with?

Why God Describes a Horse at All

God is not giving Job a nature lesson. Its aim is to break a man's confidence in his own judgment about God.

Now He comes to the horse itself, and to the war horse in particular. "Have you given the horse strength? Have you clothed his neck with thunder?" What have you to do with it? (vv. 19-25). It is a splendid description indeed, but it is all for the purpose of overwhelming Job with the folly of his pretending to talk about God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The horse is one item in a long parade. God brings out each creature as evidence in the same case.

From the wonders of the lifeless creation above, beneath and around, Jehovah now turns to the animal kingdom. The lion, the raven, the wild goat or ibex, the wild ass, the wild ox, the ostrich, the horse, the hawk and the eagle appear one after another. They show the man who dares to sit in judgment on God's doings how ignorant and powerless he is.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Cry Among the Trumpets

The cry "Aha!" is the horse's answer to the trumpet, and one Hebrew word carries it.

The war-horse answers the trumpet with Ha, Ha: he is ready. Job 39:25. The same Hebrew word is translated AH, AHA.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The noise that ends the verse — the thunder of the captains and the shouting — only drives him forward. What would send another animal running does the opposite here.

He does not shy away from danger, but rushes right into it. Swordsmen opposing him do not slow him down (v. 22). The spear and the javelin mean nothing to him, but the clash of arms seems only to increase his fierceness and rage (v. 24). Though he is not a wild animal, when engaged in war he seems to have the qualities of the wildest of animals. The sound of the trumpet does not stop him, but spurs him on (vv. 24-25). As long as the noise and shouting of the battle continues, he continues his advance.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Courage That Was Given

Job did not give the horse its strength. God presses that point on him.

Did Job give the war horse his strength, or clothe his neck with the rustling mane, or make him leap like the locust? The picture of the war horse in battle is sublime too. God shows Job a glimpse of His works, and of the wisdom that created them, as well as His care in keeping them. Such is the God whom Job has spoken against.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Magnificent, and Still No Refuge

Admiring the animal is one thing; leaning on it is another. One writer sets this animal beside God's warning to Israel.

The horse, especially in the days our book speaks of, and in the East, was used chiefly in war. God warned His people not to put their trust in this mighty instrument of war: "The war horse is a false hope for salvation." "Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God" (Ps. 20:7). It is He who "has triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider he has thrown into the sea" (Ex. 15:1). So infinitely exalted is Jehovah above all His creatures. Let Job remember how small he is, and humble himself before Him who is God over all. His deliverance must come, not from horses, but from the Lord on high.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Power Christians Lack

Another writer reads the horse as a picture of power and asks why believers show so little of it.

The horse is a symbol of power. Read the graphic description of the horse by the Lord in Job 39:19-25... Now the Holy Spirit is given so that the believer may have power. Our Lord told the disciples to wait for the promise of the Father — "until you are clothed with power from on high." Why are Christians so little marked by power?

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — the horse's fearlessness is strength God handed out; Job never gave it, and could not have.

- Given, therefore humbling — God lines the horse up with the lion, ostrich, hawk and eagle. Job judged God's ways, yet he knows and controls nothing.

- Given, and eager — the cry at the trumpet means "he is ready"; spears and shouting only speed him up.

- Given, but not a refuge — God warned Israel not to trust horses; deliverance comes from the Lord, not from the strongest creature He made.

- Given, and still on offer — the God who clothed this neck with thunder now gives His Spirit; the Christian receives power and never produces it.

Job 39:26 · Darby

Doth the hawk fly by thine intelligence, [and] stretch his wings toward the south?

God's questions to Job have moved from lifeless creation to living creatures — the lion, the ostrich, the war horse, and now the hawk. The verse asks who set the bird's course south. Behind it stands a bigger question: is a man who cannot answer fit to judge God's ways with him?

Where the Question Sits

The hawk stands in a line of creatures, and God brings each one forward for the same reason.

From the wonders of lifeless creation above, beneath, and around, Jehovah now turns to the animal kingdom. The lion, the raven, the wild goat or ibex, the wild ass, the wild ox, the ostrich, the horse, the hawk, and the eagle appear one after another. They come to convince the man who dares to sit in judgment on God's doings of his own ignorance and powerlessness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The hawk question is a test. It measures Job against the role he had taken up as God's judge.

Job had presumed to sit in judgment on Jehovah and His ways; his competence for this is tested: what does he know? What can he do? Shall the creature — so weak in power, so ignorant, so filled with empty pride — presume to instruct God about His duties? Shall he point out God's failures, and in fact take over what belongs to Him alone?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Who Gave the Hawk Its Powers

The hawk's skill in the air came from somewhere, and Job did not put it there.

Now He looks at the hawk, and the eagle more particularly. "Is it by your understanding that the hawk soars?" Who was it that gave these special powers to all these animals and birds? "Is it at your command that the eagle mounts up and makes his nest on high?"

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Wings Toward the South

The word for hawk covers a family of birds, and some of them travel south each year.

The Hebrew word is nets, and it covers the different species of hawk, of which there are several. Some at least of the hawks are migratory. This is thought to be what Job 39:26 refers to in the words "spreads his wings toward the south." The most common of the smaller hawks in Palestine is the Kestrel.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Instinct is a name for that behaviour, not an explanation of it. The usual reasons given do not fit what birds do.

Jehovah comes back to the creatures that live by preying on others. He asks whether it is Job's wisdom that directs the hawk to take its southward journey as winter approaches. What is this mysterious power, called instinct, that moves the birds to migrate to warmer regions? If it is only the lack of food, why do they fly while food is still plentiful, as the swallows do? And why in flocks? And why to the south? "Even the stork in the heavens knows her times, and the turtledove, swallow, and crane keep the time of their coming" (Jeremiah 8:7).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Instinct Has an Author

Not every creature has this sense of timing. So where did the hawk get it?

Of course scientists would say it is by instinct that birds migrate to a warmer climate. But polar bears, for instance, do not have this instinct, and neither do penguins. Who gave this instinct to some birds? Only their Creator.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Familiar Sights, One Answer

God points at what a suffering man could see from where he sat. Every sight leads back to one answer.

And so Jehovah comes down to the human level and points out these familiar things in the scene around the suffering saint. Does he see that prowling lioness? Who gives it food for its young? Who listens to the hungry croak of the raven? Who guides the hawk in its homing flight, or the king of birds, the eagle, with its home on high? There is only one answer.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the Silence Achieved

The hawk and the eagle close the case, and Job has nothing to say.

The hawk too may teach him a lesson. Is it by Job's instructions that the hawk soars high into the air? Is it by his command that the eagle mounts up and builds his nest at a dizzy height, where he watches for his prey? Job could give no answer. His silence is agreement.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

But the humbling is not the end. There is a promise waiting on the other side of the lesson.

Let Job only learn his lesson, and he will be satisfied with good things. His youth will be renewed like the eagle. He will mount up with wings, never again to grow weary.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — God answers Job's complaint with questions. What does Job know? What can he do? They test his fitness to judge God's ways.

- Wisdom — God gave the hawk its skill in flight. Job never gave a bird one power it has.

- South — the spread wings mean migration. Hunger cannot explain it, since birds leave while food is still plentiful.

- Giver — polar bears and penguins have no such timing. The instinct points back to the Creator who gave it.

- Silence — Job has no answer, and his silence is agreement. Learn the lesson, and God renews his strength like the eagle's.

Job 39:27 · Darby

Doth the eagle mount up at thy command, and make his nest on high?

Near the end of the speech from the whirlwind, God asks Job whether the eagle climbs to its nesting crag on his orders. Only one answer is possible, and the real subject is not the bird but the man arguing with God.

Where the Question Falls

The eagle is the last in a procession of creatures God parades before Job. Each one is chosen for a reason, and the cumulative effect is what matters.

Jehovah has shown the wonders of the lifeless creation above, beneath, and around. Now He turns to the animal kingdom. The lion, the raven, the wild goat or ibex, the wild ass, the wild ox, the ostrich, the horse, the hawk, and the eagle appear one after another. They convince the man who dares to sit in judgment on God's doings that he is ignorant and powerless.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Flight Beyond Man's Reach

Two things lie outside Job's power here: the eagle's flight, and the idea of a bird at all.

God tells Job to consider the eagle too. Did Job command it to rise in flight to the tremendous heights of the mountains? In fact, if man, when he was created, had never seen a bird, would it even enter his mind to create such a creature?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A high crag meant something different in a world without climbing gear.

To understand the Bible's references to things like eagles, we have to remember that these were days before modern rock-climbing equipment. In every eagle story, the idea is never far away that the eagle belongs to a region beyond the reach of all natural powers.

Modernised from J. S. BlackburnOriginal wording

Why God Asks at All

The questions have a purpose, and one writer states it plainly.

But what is the aim of the Lord in putting these questions? To show that God is greater than man, and to humble man. To bring Job to the true knowledge of himself that he needed, and to free him from the pride of his heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Small Things Silence Him as Surely as Great

God could have stopped at the stars and the sea. Instead He comes down to birds and beasts, and the argument only tightens.

He does not content Himself with showing man's littleness by what is vast. He takes up what we might think are smaller things... So it matters little whether we gaze at the greatest of God's works or look into the least. Everywhere we meet what is entirely beyond man's understanding... Job had even pretended to judge God's moral depths. But he could not face what God is in the least part of His universe, and he had no adequate idea of it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Power That Also Cares

God shows Job two things held together, and He shows them in dangerous creatures as well as gentle ones.

What He dwells on are two things in particular — His supremacy, and His power joined with the most tender care. That care is not only for harmless animals such as sheep and lambs, but for lions and lionesses, which are certainly formidable. And the eagle — an object of special interest to God... Was it you, Job, who managed all these things? Was it you who cared for them all, provided for them all?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Picture Behind the Bird

Elsewhere in the Bible, the same eagle pictures how God carries His own people.

"Like an eagle that stirs up its nest, that flutters over its young, spreading out its wings, catching them, bearing them on its pinions, the LORD alone guided him" (Deuteronomy 32:11-12)... On the crag of rock, out of man's reach, she builds her nest and rears her young. The time comes when she would teach her young ones to gaze at the sun and soar from the rock themselves.

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

Job's Answer

When the questions end, Job stops talking.

It is Jehovah-God, then, who alone orders and alone knows. His kind wisdom takes in every creature, and not least those clearly outside all the care or even the knowledge of man. Is he then to contend with God, or, if he is so presumptuous, can he pretend to instruct God? Job feels and owns his vileness; he goes no further down that road.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — God points to the eagle's climb and its high nest. Job never commanded it and could not have imagined it.

- Ignorance — Creature after creature shows the man who judges God's doings that he is ignorant and powerless.

- Smallness — God argues from the least of His works as well as the greatest; man is at a loss either way.

- Care — God joins supremacy to tender care, and that care reaches creatures no human eye watches over.

- Silence — Job stops arguing, owns what he is, and goes no further — which was the aim from the start.

Job 39:28 · Darby

He inhabiteth the rock and maketh his dwelling on the point of the cliff, and the fastness

Near the end of His speech from the whirlwind, God walks Job past creature after creature he never made and cannot govern. The last of them is the eagle, whose home is a cliff edge no man can reach. If Job cannot account for where an eagle sleeps, how can he sit in judgment on the way God runs his life?

A creature that answers only to God

The eagle's home on the crag is one item in a much longer list. The same three facts hold at every step of it.

God speaks first about the inanimate things, the earth, sea, clouds, hail and rain. He shows three things about them. First, that He designed them; second, that He created them; and third, that He controls them. Consider the whole range of inanimate things that make up the world and the whole range of living creatures, and God commands them all. It says, "Is it at your command that the eagle mounts up and makes his nest on high?" All the eagles on the earth, all moving to execute the demands of God.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The rock God gave the eagle

The verse does not just describe an eagle's habits. It says who chose them, and what Job should have learned from that.

God exercises a watchful oversight over every creature — young or old, beast or bird, even the least familiar or the hardest to reach — with the goodness and wisdom that made them. If that is true, was it not for Job to listen and learn, instead of darkening counsel by words without knowledge? And His ways with His people are certainly far deeper than His dealings with the animal world. Yet even there we see His sovereign control everywhere. He, not man, has made them what they are, and ordered their habits and their habitations.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That same rock, out of human reach, is where the next generation is raised and taught to fly.

On the crag of rock, where no man can come, she builds her nest and rears her young. Then the time comes when she sets out to teach her young ones to gaze at the sun and to soar from the rock themselves. So she stirs up her nest and flutters over her young. The young ones must dare the open air below, and she flings them off the rock!

Modernised from F. G. PattersonOriginal wording

Keener eyes than the eagle's

The stronghold is also a high perch, and God gave the bird eyes to match it. The lesson runs upward from the eagle to its Maker.

Job was to learn from this that the One who made the eagle and its penetrating eyes surely has keener eyes than the eagle. His judgments can be fully trusted.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Power that is never cold

The parade of creatures is not a display of raw force. Two things stand out in this parade of creatures, and they belong together.

What He dwells on are two things in particular — His supremacy, and His power joined with the most tender care. That care is not just for the gentle animals, such as sheep and lambs and the like, but for lions and lionesses, which are certainly very formidable. And the eagle — an object of interest to God particularly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Job's nest and the eagle's rock

God's picture of a nest set safe on a rock had a sharp edge for Job. He had used the same picture of himself.

Job, though the most righteous man on earth at that time, was in danger of being puffed up as a result. He said himself, "I shall die in my nest" (Job 29:18), and it is also recorded that "he was righteous in his own eyes" (Job 32:1). In the first statement Job was in danger of putting his confidence in the wealth God had blessed him with. In the second he was sure he deserved it. But it was God and not the nest who was his safeguard, and his righteousness was according to divine estimation and not according to his own.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Why put Job through all this questioning at all?

And yet Jehovah is not seeking to crush Job, but rather to bring him to a true knowledge of himself and of God. Let him get ready for action like a man. God will not ask questions which a man cannot understand. With the belt of truth fastened on, he can answer — as indeed he does — these questions. The very fact that Jehovah speaks to Job like this shows His purposes of mercy for him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Commanded. The eagle flies and nests at God's word, not man's. He designed, created and still controls every creature in this chapter.

- Housed. God ordered the habits and homes of His creatures. He gave the eagle its crag, and no man can climb to it.

- Seen. God made the eagle's piercing eyes. His own sight is keener still, so His judgments can be trusted.

- Cared for. What God displays here is supremacy joined to tender care, extending to lions and eagles as much as to lambs.

- Taught. Job meant to die in his own nest. God stirred it, not to crush him, but to teach him that God, not the nest, was his safeguard.

Job 39:29 · Darby

From thence he spieth out the prey, his eyes look into the distance;

God answers Job with a long run of questions about His creatures, and the hawk and the eagle come near the end of them. Here the eagle scans for food from its high rock — so what is a hunting bird meant to teach a suffering man about God?

Why God Asks About a Bird

The verse sits inside a run of questions about the hawk and the eagle. One commentator gathers these questions around the One who gave the birds their powers:

Now He looks at the hawk, and at the eagle in particular. "Does the hawk fly by your wisdom?" Who was it that gave these special powers to all these animals and birds? "Is it at your command that the eagle mounts up and makes his nest on high?" (vv. 26-30).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Eye That Reaches Farther Than Man's

The verse is about sight, and about what the eagle does the moment it sees.

From the highest heights the eagle observes its prey (v.29). Its amazing eyes see a small creature from the greatest distances. Then it drops like an arrow to catch its prey and carry it to its young ones in the nest.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer treats this as the design of a Creator who both made the creature and directs it:

He shows three things about them. First, He designed them. Second, He created them. Third, He controls them. Consider the whole range of inanimate things that make up the world and the whole range of living creatures, and God commands them all. It says, "Is it at your command that the eagle mounts up and makes his nest on high?" (Job 39:27). All the eagles on the earth, all moving to execute the demands of God.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Hunting as Care

The eagle hunts to feed its young. One commentator sets this whole part of the book under God's providing care:

In this part we move from the glories of the Creator to the wisdom and goodness of God as the One who provides. He not only planned the wonderful design of the universe. He has also filled the earth with living creatures, and they depend on Him for life and all things.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Elsewhere the same writer notes which creatures God chooses to speak about:

He dwells on two things in particular. One is His supremacy. The other is His power, joined to the most tender care — not only care for good animals, such as sheep and lambs, but for lions and lionesses, which are truly fearsome. And the eagle in particular is an object of interest to God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From Sharp Eyes to Sure Judgment

The far-seeing eye also points to God's judgments. One commentator applies it to Job:

All this tells us that God has a means of carrying out His judgments, whether man understands it or not. Job was to learn from this that the One who made the eagle and its penetrating eyes, surely has eyes more keen than the eagle, and His judgments can be fully trusted.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the Argument Lands

The run of questions ends by putting one challenge to Job:

It is Jehovah-God then who alone orders and alone knows. His kind wisdom takes in every creature, and not least those that are clearly outside all the care or even the knowledge of man. Is he then to argue with God? And if he is so presumptuous, can he pretend to instruct God?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen — The eagle's whole advantage is sight. From its height it marks a small creature far below, then drops on it like an arrow.

- Given — That sight was not self-taught. The bird mounts, nests, and hunts at God's command, one of many creatures He designed, made, and still directs.

- Fed — The prey it sees becomes food for its young. God's care covers lions and birds of prey, not only sheep and lambs.

- Outmatched — The Maker who gave the eagle such eyes has keener eyes still. Job can trust the judgments of the One who sees everything.

- Silenced — God alone orders and alone knows, including what lies far outside man's care or knowledge. A man who cannot command a bird cannot instruct God.

Job 39:30 · Darby

And his young ones suck up blood; and where the slain are, there is he.

Job 39 ends God's tour of the animal world with its sharpest-eyed creature: a bird that nests on a crag and finds the dead on a battlefield. Job had been arguing with God about how the world is run, and this last picture asks who designed that chain, from the nest on the rock to the blood in the young birds' beaks.

The Question Behind the Picture

God's questions about the hawk and the eagle are not a nature lesson.

Now He looks at the hawk, and the eagle more particularly. "Does the hawk fly by your wisdom?" Who was it that gave these special powers to all these animals and birds? "Does the eagle mount up at your command, and make her nest on high?"

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer notes that this splendid description has a purpose: it is "all for the purpose of overwhelming Job with the folly of his pretending to talk about God."

Eyesight That Argues for God's Sight

The eagle's penetrating eyes point to something greater. One writer draws the lesson Job was meant to learn.

All this tells us that God has a means of carrying out His judgments, whether man understands it or not. Job was to learn from this: the One who made the eagle and its penetrating eyes surely has eyes keener than the eagle. His judgments can be fully trusted.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Which Bird Is Meant

The bird here may not be the lone eagle we picture today. A crowd of birds arriving at a dead body fits another bird of that region.

This is probably the bird known as the Griffon Vulture or Great Vulture... though the word may include other species. Its habits match what Scripture says about the eagle, and these birds are common in Palestine. No sooner does an animal fall than these birds gather in numbers on its carcass... The true eagle is a solitary bird, but vultures are seldom found alone... Its swiftness is proverbial, and it rests on the highest rocks.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Scavengers in the Service of God

The scene is grim: young birds lapping blood. Yet one writer sees the bird still serving God's will, and looks ahead to a final feast.

Does the eagle rise to dizzy heights at man's command, and build its nest on some high crag, from where its eye takes in the far-off prey for its helpless young? It follows that battle into which the horse has rushed, and "where the slain are, there is he." God uses these all to fulfil His will, and He sustains and cares for them. He will call them to one great feast at last, when the angel summons them: "Come, gather for the great supper of God, to eat the flesh of kings... and the flesh of all men, both free and slave, both small and great" (Revelation 19:17-18).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Judgment with an Eagle's Speed

The picture did not stay in Job. One writer shows where the Lord used it, and what it meant for Israel.

The Lord makes some allusion to Job 39:30, though it is a proverbial expression, which one need not go far to find the meaning of. Where the carcass of Israel is, there will the judgment of God descend with the sight and speed of an eagle.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Others have read the picture differently. One writer rejects those readings and applies it to Israel.

The revolting interpretation that "the carcass" means Christ, and "the eagles" the transfigured saints, or the reverse, deserves rebuke rather than discussion... Applied to Israel, all is simple. The carcass represents the apostate part of that nation; the eagles, or vultures, are the figure of the judgments that fall upon it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the Argument Lands

Verse 30 ends the animal survey. One writer states where the whole parade leaves Job.

So it is Jehovah-God who alone orders and alone knows. His kind wisdom takes in every creature, not least the creatures that are clearly outside all the care, or even the notice, of man. Is Job then to contend with God? Or, if he is so bold, can he pretend to instruct God?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Creator — The question is not how the eagle behaves. It asks who gave the bird its powers, its nest on high, and its far-seeing eyes.

- Eyes — Job must reason upward from the bird's eyesight. The One who made those eyes sees further still, so His judgments can be trusted.

- Servants — Even birds feeding on the dead serve God's will. He cares for them, and He will summon them to a final feast.

- Echo — The Lord took up this line again. God's judgment falls with an eagle's sight and speed.

- Silence — The bird that sees everything leaves Job with nothing to say. He cannot contend with God, much less instruct Him.

Job 40:1 · Darby

And Jehovah answered Job and said,

The voice out of the whirlwind pauses, and God turns from creation to speak to one man by name. Why does He pause here, and what is He asking Job to do?

A break in the questions

God's questions have run on for chapters. One writer notes the break and what fills the space around it:

The words of Jehovah fill four chapters, with a brief interlude at the opening of Job 40. He puts question after question to Job for him to consider and answer, if he could. All of them concern the mighty power that had acted in creation.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Those questions were about creation. Now the aim narrows to the man himself:

Just notice how directly He puts the question in Job 40 to Job in person. "Moreover Jehovah answered Job, and said, Shall the one who contends with the Almighty instruct Him?" He ought to be able, if he judges God. This is what fills Job with shame... Job had contended with the Almighty.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The name God gives him

The challenge that follows names Job by what he has been doing:

And Jehovah answered Job, and said, Is the censurer to correct with the Almighty? The reprover of God, let him answer it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer sets that challenge against who God is:

It is Jehovah-God then, who alone orders and alone knows. His kind wisdom takes in every creature, including those clearly outside all the care or even the knowledge of man. Is he then to contend with God, or, if he is so presumptuous, can he pretend to instruct God?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What was actually wrong with Job

Job's friends had accused him of hidden crimes. God's charge is different, and one writer locates it precisely:

Here lies the root of Job's trouble: he had sat in judgment on God — he had accused the Almighty of evil.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

God takes Job at his word

Job had asked for exactly this hearing. He wanted God to answer so he could lay out his case. Now the request is granted, and the effect is not what he expected:

Job had said that if God would only listen to him, he would present his whole case showing how God was unfair in His dealings. So now God gives Job the opportunity to do this. He asks Job, "Shall the one who contends with the Almighty correct Him?" Where were Job's arguments then? How crushing God's words were to the misplaced pride of Job!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the whirlwind and not a gentle voice

One writer ties the storm to what Job still needed to learn:

It was not the lesson of a sinner that Job had to learn. He already knew the grace of God. It was the lesson of a saint he needed to be taught, or taught more fully. That is why the Lord seats Himself in the whirlwind. Suppose Job had needed to learn the lesson of a sinner for the first time. Then the Lord would rather have spoken to him in "the still small voice," the tone that suits grace... But Job was already a saved sinner. He knew the grace, but had still to be taught the rights, of God.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The answer God was waiting for

Job does reply. One writer weighs what that answer admits:

He says, "Behold, I am vile; what shall I answer You? I lay my hand over my mouth..." Job goes deeper here than apologising for what he has said. He expresses his judgment of himself as a person... Then he judges also what he had spoken more than once, and says he lays his hand over his mouth. This is just what Romans 3:19 says of all mankind: "that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God."

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Yet Job's confession is not the end of the story:

Here the test of Job is all but over. Yet in faithfulness Jehovah will probe still further, into the deepest corners of his heart, to lay bare its potential evil. So we must listen further to what the Lord has to speak.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- The pause — The questions about creation break off. God turns to speak to Job in person.

- The charge — Job had sat in judgment on God and accused Him of wrong.

- The invitation — Job had demanded a hearing. God grants it, and asks His critic to answer.

- The purpose — Job already knew God's grace. Now he had to learn God's rights, so the voice came out of a storm.

- The result — A hand over the mouth. That is the answer God waited for, and the posture every mouth takes before Him at last.

Job 40:2 · Darby

Shall he that will contend with the Almighty instruct [him]? he that reproveth +God, let him answer it.

God answers Job with a question of His own: can a man who argues with the Almighty correct Him? Job had asked for this meeting, and now he must make his case or drop it.

The hearing Job asked for

This verse is God taking Job at his word. The ESV calls him a "faultfinder". The older wording the writers use asks whether the man who contends with the Almighty can correct Him.

Job had said that if God would only listen to him, he would present his whole case. He would show how God was unfair in His dealings. Therefore now God gives Job opportunity to do this. He asks Job, "Shall the one who contends with the Almighty correct Him? He who rebukes God, let him answer it." Where were Job's arguments then? How withering God's words were to Job's shameless pride!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A claim, not a mood

To rebuke God is to claim you can instruct Him. The question asks Job to make that claim good.

If he judges God, he ought to be able to instruct Him. This is precisely what fills Job with shame. Job had contended with the Almighty. God brought Job right down from his own high opinion of himself. He was ashamed that he had complained against God and His ways without understanding the least of them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The root of Job's trouble

So where did Job go wrong? One writer points past the suffering to Job's own answer, quoted here in older wording.

Here lies the root of Job's trouble: he had sat in judgment upon God; he had accused the Omnipotent of evil. God has come near. He has made His presence felt, and pulled back the veil from nature to show part of His character. What is the effect on the proud man? "I am vile; what shall I answer You?" "I will lay my hand on my mouth."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the answer is obvious once stated

The question answers itself, once you grant one plain truth.

If God is greater than man, then, obviously, He, and not man, must be the Judge of what is right. The unbelieving heart refuses this. So it keeps sitting in judgment on the works and ways and word of God — on God Himself. In his godless folly, man sets himself up to judge what is and is not worthy of God. He decides what God ought and ought not to say and do.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A hard question from a tender heart

The question sounds harsh. One writer looks at the heart behind it.

Poor Job. He little knew the tenderness of the heart that was leading him to sound the depths of his own mind. He was to learn himself in his own insignificance, in the smallness of his outlook, in the poverty of his ideas of God... In short, deep sorrow was to teach him two things. Without knowing it, he had been making JOB his own centre. And the worst immorality is to judge GOD by what Job thought He ought to be and do.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

What God is working toward

Pride like Job's is not unique to him. One writer sets it against what grace produces.

What a proud thing is the flesh, and no better in the saint than in the sinner! Would Job also set aside the moral dealings of Jehovah? Worse still, would he condemn Him to justify himself? Grace produces the exact opposite in every soul born of God. It makes a person ready to take God's part against self, to judge his own ways, and to bow to the word, however withering its blast on every way or word, thought and feeling. Such is repentance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Contend — Job had demanded a hearing to argue that God was unfair. This verse gives him what he asked for, and his arguments vanish.

- Correct — the question tests a claim. Anyone who rebukes God is claiming to instruct Him, and would have to be able to make that good.

- Cause — Job's real trouble was not his losses. He had sat in judgment on God and charged Him with wrong.

- Common — the same reflex runs deeper than Job. Since God is greater than man, He, and not man, must decide what is right; yet the heart still rules on what is worthy of God.

- Converse — grace works the other way round. It takes God's part against self, judges one's own ways, and bows to His word. That is repentance.

Job 40:3 · Darby

And Job answered Jehovah and said,

Job 40:3 is one line of narrative, yet it turns the whole book. After thirty-seven chapters of argument, and after God's questions out of the storm, Job speaks again — now to answer God, not to plead his case.

The Hearing Job Asked For

Earlier Job had asked God to answer him, and he expected to face Him with dignity.

"My desire is that the Almighty would answer me" was Job's closing word (Job 31:35). Now he is to have his wish granted — but how different the effect! "I would go near to Him like a prince," he had declared (verse 37). "I am worthless" is what he has to say when he hears His voice.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Question That Silenced Him

God had challenged Job to answer. His reply is not the argument he once planned.

It is one thing to review the opinions of men, as Job might review those of his friends. It is quite another to sit in judgment on Jehovah's ways. Job had wished to come near His seat, and plead his own cause. Here He was now, if Job could answer, according to the boldness of his reproofs. The only answer he does make is to acknowledge himself worthless. He had no answer to the divine challenge beyond the confession implied in laying his hand on his mouth. The folly of refusing to submit is now before his soul. He had spoken too much: silence suited him. It was for Jehovah to speak.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Majesty, Not Argument

Chapters 38–39 never answer Job's question about why he suffers. God shows Himself instead.

Jehovah answered Job out of the whirlwind (Job 38, 39). He did not use argument, or even instruction. He displayed the witness of His majesty and power, so that Job had to say, "Behold, I am of small account: what shall I answer you? I lay my hand upon my mouth: once have I spoken, and I will not answer; yes twice, but I will proceed no further" (Job 40:3-5).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

More Than Taking Back His Words

Job could have withdrawn a few rash statements. His answer reaches past his speeches to himself.

Job goes deeper here than apologising for what he has said, for he expresses his judgment of himself personally. Indeed, how true it is that we ourselves, in our sinful nature, are worse than the worst thing we have ever said or done. Then he also judges what he had spoken more than once, and he says he lays his hand over his mouth. Romans 3:19 says the same of all mankind: "so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God."

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Silenced, But Not Yet Finished

God does not stop here. He speaks again from Job 40:6 on, and Job's fuller confession comes only in chapter 42.

There is in this confession the owning of what he is — worthless. But in the second confession he will go much further than this.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

God speaks again for a reason.

God will not leave His servant with his lesson half learned. He plows deeper into his heart until He reaches and judges the hidden depths of pride.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Job Was Repenting Of

Job was not a scandalous man, and his repentance was not about a hidden immoral life.

Was Job deeply sorry for a life of open sin and immorality? Oh, no! this was not Job's case at all. He was a true man of God; and had spent one of the most moral and upright lives on record… Then of what did he repent? He repented of this: — his striving to establish his own righteousness.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Self-Judgment Rests on Trust

A man crushed with no confidence in God would only despair. Commentators read Job's collapse and his trust as arriving together.

Here then, in Job's case, we see both — his own worthlessness, and his confidence in God. It was his confidence in God, we may be very sure, that made him feel and own his worthlessness. His grace is the power. The last thing a man comes to is to think badly of himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Answered. Job demanded a hearing with God. Verse 3 records him getting it, and the prince who meant to argue can only call himself a man of small account.

- Silenced. God explained nothing about Job's suffering. He showed His majesty instead, and that alone stopped the mouth thirty-seven chapters of debate could not stop.

- Deeper. Job does more than regret his words. He judges himself, and owns the self-righteousness behind them. Scripture passes that verdict on everyone.

- Unfinished. This is the first of two answers. God speaks again, because He will not leave the lesson half learned, and the full repentance comes in chapter 42.

- Trusting. Job's low view of himself grew out of confidence in God, not despair. Grace is the power that brings a man to think badly of himself, and that is the last thing he learns.

Job 40:4 · Darby

Behold, I am nought what shall I answer thee? I will lay my hand upon my mouth.

Job had demanded a hearing with God, and now he has one. After all his long speeches, his answer is a few words and then silence. Why does seeing God make a man turn against himself instead of defending himself — and is that confession the end of the matter, or only the start? (The writers below quote older translations, which render the opening words "I am vile.")

The Answer God Was Waiting For

Job's reply is short. It ends his case, and with it his complaint that God had treated him unfairly.

And Job answers — and what an answer it is! It is the answer God was waiting for. "Look! I am vile; what shall I answer You? I will lay my hand upon my mouth." He admits that he had spoken too much, and that now he cannot answer and will go no further. He is completely silenced. He admits his own nothingness and vileness, that his words were wrong, and that he has nothing else to say. He was sure that a God who had spoken to him of creation and His creatures, showing His power, wisdom and care, could never be unjust in His dealings with man.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Wish Granted, the Effect Reversed

Job had asked for this very meeting. He had also pictured how he would handle it.

"My desire is that the Almighty would answer me," was Job's closing word (Job 31:35). Now he gets his wish — but what a different result! "As a prince would I go near to Him" (verse 37), he had declared. "I am vile" is what he has to say when he hears His voice.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Judging God, Not Just Men

Job had done more than weigh up his friends' arguments. He had judged God.

It is one thing to weigh up the opinions of men, as Job might weigh those of his friends. It is quite another to sit in judgment on God's ways. Job had wanted to come near God's throne and plead his own case. Now here God was — ready for Job to answer, if he could, as boldly as he had rebuked. The only answer he gives is to admit that he is vile. He had no answer to God's challenge except the confession that lay in putting his hand over his mouth… He now sees how foolish his refusal to submit was. He had spoken too much. Silence was what suited him. It was God's turn to speak.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three Words in Place of Self-Defence

New thoughts about God gave Job new thoughts about himself. His whole defence went with them.

His new thoughts about God brought new thoughts about himself at once. So we find that the careful self-defence, the passionate self-importance, the loud self-praise, the long arguments in his own favour — he lays it all aside. One short sentence of three words takes its place: "I am vile." And what is there to do with this vile self? Talk about it? Set it up? Fill his mind with it? Take advice about it? Make provision for it? No — "I abhor it."

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same writer adds where such a confession has to be learned.

It is one thing to say "We are all vile," and quite another to feel, deep down in the heart, that "I am vile." The second of those can only be known, and felt day after day, right in God's presence.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A Real Start — but God Goes Further

Job's confession here is real, but it is not the end of the road.

In God's presence his mouth is stopped. Then he said, "I am vile"; "I will lay my hand on my mouth." But God must take Job further, because He is bringing him to Himself. Job must come to confess not only that there is no good in him, but that there is a great deal of evil… So Job takes God's side against himself. He laid himself before God, and abhorred himself. Then he repents in dust and ashes, for it is only in God's presence that we learn repentance.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Hand on the Mouth and the Whole World

Job now judges himself, not just his words. And what silenced him must silence everyone.

Job goes deeper here than apologising for what he has said. He passes judgment on himself. And how true it is that we ourselves, in our sinful nature, are worse than the worst thing we have ever said or done. Then he judges what he had spoken more than once, and says he lays his hand over his mouth. It is just as Romans 3:19 says of all mankind: "so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God."

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Sight — Job stopped arguing only when God spoke. We learn what we are in God's presence, not in debate.

- Silence — He had judged God's ways. Now he has no reply, and a hand on the mouth is all that fits when it is God's turn to speak.

- Self — The confession is personal, not general: not "people are bad," but "I am vile."

- Deeper — This is the answer God waited for, but not the end. God goes further, until Job abhors himself and repents.

- Everyone — What silenced Job must silence all. Scripture says it plainly: every mouth stopped, the whole world accountable to God.

Job 40:5 · Darby

Once have I spoken, and I will not answer; yea twice, but I will proceed no further.

God speaks to Job at last. He asks whether a man who argues against the Almighty is fit to correct Him. Job's reply is short. He covers his mouth, admits he has already spoken twice, and says he is finished — but God is not finished with him.

The Question That Ends the Argument

Job had contended with the Almighty through chapter after chapter. Now God puts one question to him, and it fills him with shame.

Notice how God puts the question in Job 40 straight to Job himself. "Then the LORD answered Job and said, Shall he who contends with the Almighty instruct Him?" Anyone who judges God ought to be able to instruct Him. This is precisely what fills Job with shame... Job had contended with the Almighty. "He who rebukes God, let him answer it." And Job does answer... He no longer stays silent like the others.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

(The ESV renders God's question, "Shall a faultfinder contend with the Almighty? He who argues with God, let him answer it." Older translations ask instead whether such a man can instruct God.)

Not an Apology, but a Verdict on Himself

Job counts up his speeches — once, then twice. The hand on his mouth reaches past his words to the man himself.

Job goes deeper here than apologising for what he has said. He passes judgment on his own person. Indeed, how true it is that we ourselves, in our sinful nature, are worse than the worst thing we have ever said or done. Then he judges what he had spoken more than once, and says he lays his hand over his mouth. Romans 3:19 says the same of all mankind: "that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God."

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God Paraded Creation Before Him

God had just paraded His works before Job, down to the great beasts behemoth and leviathan. The point was never the creatures.

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work? And what is man if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"I Will Proceed No Further" — But God Will

Job announces he is done talking. God is not done working.

He had said his words were ended, and now he says he will proceed no further. Oh yes, Job will proceed a little further yet. There is in this confession the owning of what he is — vile. But in the second confession he will go much further than this.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

A second speech from God follows in the very next verse.

God will not leave His servant with his lesson half learned. He plows deeper into his heart until He reaches and judges the hidden depths of pride. The second address therefore dwells upon this pride so common to the creature.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From Shut Mouth to Open Confession

A closed mouth is only half the work. The other half is a mouth opened in honest confession. Only then does God bless Job.

Job acknowledges his vileness. First he shuts his mouth before God, stopping his presumptuous words. Then he opens it in genuine confession before the gracious God who dealt with him. He now stood in God's presence in a truth and reality he had never known before: "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes." Then God can fully bless him, and pardon his friends, putting each in his place.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the Silenced Man Finds

Silence before God sounds like the worst outcome. It turns out to be the doorway to finding Him.

Job found it so: it was the end of his difficulty. "I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes," lifted him right out of where he was, and gave him more than he had before... And here, again, we get a sinner with his sins, standing before God with a stopped mouth. He finds only that God is for him and not against him.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Contend — Job argued against the Almighty. God's one question shows that a man who judges God ought to be able to instruct Him.

- Silenced — the hand on the mouth is more than regret over words. Job judges himself. Scripture says the whole world stands before God with that same stopped mouth.

- Turned — the parade of creation was never meant to make Job a student of nature. It turned him from his own thoughts to God Himself.

- Deeper — "I will proceed no further" ends Job's speaking, not God's working. God plows on to the root of pride.

- Accepted — the mouth shut in shame is later opened in confession. The man with nothing left to say finds God for him, not against him.

Job 40:6 · Darby

And Jehovah answered Job out of the whirlwind and said,

God has already spoken to Job out of the whirlwind once. Verse 6 shows Him starting again from the same storm — so why does Job need a second speech?

A second speech, not a repetition

The first answer had made an impression. It had not reached the bottom of Job's heart.

In this second speech these impressions go deeper. God will not leave His servant with his lesson half learned. He plows deeper into his heart, until He reaches and judges the hidden depths of pride. So the second speech dwells on this pride, which is so common to the creature. He invites Job, in effect, to see whether he can humble the proud and bring them low. The clear implication is that Job himself belongs in that group.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The whirlwind

God speaks from inside the storm, and the storm itself carries part of the message.

The whirlwind had lasted a long time, and it is still blowing when the Lord speaks in these verses. The whirlwind itself was meant to impress one thing on Job. Every circumstance of swirling trouble and confusion was under the controlling hand of the Creator. "His way is in whirlwind and storm, and the clouds are the dust of His feet" (Nahum 1:3).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Job had begged for this meeting. Now he gets it.

Job had also begged, in his frantic way, for one incomparable favour. He asked that a man, rather than God Himself, might meet him; but he asked to find God too. And so he does. God appears. The Lord Himself gives His answer from the whirlwind... this is the special value of the close of the book of Job: God does not wait till the day of judgment to decide where there is faith to look for Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Girded like a hero

What follows in verse 7 is a challenge. God will ask the questions, and Job must answer.

And the Lord does answer out of the storm. He challenges Job to gird up his loins like a hero: let the creature then teach the Creator, since God is now the One asking him questions! What a proud thing the flesh is — no better in the believer than in the sinner! Would Job put God's moral dealings on trial and set them aside? Worse still, would he condemn God so that he himself might be justified? Grace produces the exact opposite in every soul born of God. It produces a readiness to take His side against self, to judge one's own ways, and to bow to His word.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rebuke that is also kindness

The sharp challenge has another side to it. Verse 7 reads "Dress for action like a man" in the ESV; older translations say "Gird up your loins."

In the call, "Gird up your loins now like a man," we have encouragement as well as rebuke. God is not crushing His poor foolish servant. He is appealing to his reason as well as his conscience... Will Job cancel and deny God's righteous judgment, and condemn God so that he can set up a petty human righteousness? This is what lay at the bottom of Job's complaints. He was suffering trouble he did not deserve. He was a righteous man, yet he was treated as though he were unrighteous.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An invitation to the throne

God's next questions do not ask for information. They make Job an offer he cannot accept.

If Job really is qualified, God in effect invites him to take his seat on the throne of divine judgment. Let him put on his robes of pomp and dignity. Let him dress himself in grandeur and majesty. Let him pour out his anger on everyone who is proud, and bring him low. What awful, holy irony! And yet how just it is on God's part. If Job can sit in judgment on God, then surely he is qualified to run all His affairs better than He can!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The great beasts God describes next are not a nature lesson.

People talk as if God's aim were simply to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings His works forward to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He who made them? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God? ... He would turn us away from ourselves to trust in Himself. Do you think that after this Job was taken up with behemoth or leviathan? Not at all — he was taken up with God. That was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Again. God speaks a second time because He will not leave the lesson half learned. He plows deeper, until He reaches and judges Job's hidden pride.

- Storm. He speaks from the whirlwind that is still blowing. Every swirling trouble sits under the Creator's controlling hand.

- Hero. God calls Job to gird up his loins like a hero. Now the creature must teach the Creator, who is the One asking the questions.

- Mercy. The call is encouragement as well as rebuke. God appeals to Job's reason and conscience instead of crushing him.

- Throne. God offers Job His own majesty and the task of humbling the proud. It is holy irony: anyone fit to judge God must be fit to run His affairs. The whole display aims to turn Job away from himself and toward God.

Job 40:7 · Darby

Gird up now thy loins like a man I will demand of thee, and inform thou me.

God speaks to Job out of the storm again, and He calls him to stand up and answer. Job had wanted a meeting with God to argue his case. He gets one — but God asks the questions.

The storm still blowing

God had already answered from the whirlwind, and He has not stopped.

The whirlwind had continued a long time, and is still blowing when the Lord speaks in these verses. The whirlwind itself was meant to press one truth on Job. Every swirling trouble and confusion stood under the controlling hand of the Creator. "His way is in whirlwind and storm, and the clouds are the dust of His feet" (Nahum 1:3).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Job's wish granted

Job's earlier wish is answered here, though not in the shape he imagined.

Look back at the beginning of Job 23. There Job confidently said he wished he could reach God. He felt sure he could lay out his case before Him, fill his mouth with arguments, and know the words God would use to answer him. Now the moment came for that wish to be granted. Jehovah tells him to gird up his loins like a man and be ready to answer the voice of God. The questions would now come from God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The force of "like a man"

Older translations open the verse, "Gird up your loins like a man"; the ESV has "Dress for action like a man." The word for "man" here is not the one Job used of himself. It carries strength, not weakness.

God's word here is not "mortal man." Job had said, "What is man, that you are mindful of him?" He used the word "man" in the sense of mortality or weakness. But God employs a very different word: "Gird up now your loins like a hero"; for this is pretty much the force of the word. It means a strong man. He had challenged God to this judicial trial, and now he was heard.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rebuke, but not crushing

The call to stand up has two edges.

God still speaks to Job out of the whirlwind, as He had already appeared to him. So His divine glory and majesty are still before Job. Yet in the call, "Gird up your loins now like a man," we have encouragement as well as rebuke. God is not crushing His poor foolish servant. He is appealing to his reason as well as his conscience... But this appeal is mainly to his conscience. Will he cancel and deny God's righteous judgment, and condemn God in order to set up a small human righteousness of his own?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The offer of the throne

If Job is fit to judge God, let him take the throne and rule.

If indeed he is thus qualified, Jehovah as it were invites him to take his seat upon the throne of divine judgment. Let him put on his robes of splendour and dignity. Let him dress himself in grandeur and majesty. Let his wrath pour out on everyone who is proud, and bring him low. What awful, holy irony! And yet how divinely just. If Job can sit in judgment on God, he must be qualified to run all His affairs better than He does! He can crush the proud rebellion of every evildoer and bring people into the dust before him. Has he done that with his own proud and rebellious heart? Has he humbled even his friends? How much less the whole world.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why a second round of questions

God does not stop at one round of questions.

The Lord's questions here continue through chapter 41, so that Job's answer is found in chapter 42:1-6. But the Lord had deeper work to do in Job's soul. His questions probe Job's heart more deeply than Job ever expected.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the probing leads

The end of this dealing is not despair but the discovery that no one saves himself.

Job had to learn that only the living God is the Saviour. He does not save those who deserve it. He saves those who are humbled to the dust and admit they deserve nothing but judgment. God saves by grace, through the great value of the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus at Calvary. At that time Job knew nothing of that great sacrifice. But he could still know he was a sinner, depending only on the grace of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Challenge — Job asked to argue his case before God. He gets the meeting, but God asks the questions.

- Call — "Like a man" means like a hero, a strong man. God calls Job to stand at full strength for the trial he demanded.

- Kindness — the call rebukes Job and lifts him at the same time. God appeals to his reason and conscience instead of crushing him.

- Throne — God offers Job His own seat of judgment. The holy irony is plain: Job cannot even humble his own proud heart.

- Saviour — the deeper probing brings Job down to the dust. That is where the living God saves those who admit they deserve nothing.

Job 40:8 · Darby

Wilt thou also annul my judgment? wilt thou condemn me that thou mayest be righteous?

God answers Job out of the storm, and He does not explain Job's suffering. He asks a question instead. Behind all Job's protests lay a quiet assumption: if Job was right, God must be wrong. This verse drags it into the open.

The charge inside the question

"Put me in the wrong" is the first half of the charge. One writer traces it back to what lay underneath Job's complaints.

God is not crushing His poor foolish servant. He is appealing to his reason as well as his conscience. But the present appeal is especially to his conscience. Will he annul and deny God's righteous judgment? Will he condemn God so that he may set up a petty human righteousness? This is what lay at the bottom of Job's complaints. He was suffering affliction he did not deserve. He was a righteous man, treated as though he were unrighteous. The conclusion was then unavoidable — the One afflicting him was unjust!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Then take the throne

God then offers Job the seat his reasoning had claimed, with the robes and the wrath that go with it.

If he is truly qualified, Jehovah as it were invites him to take his seat on the throne of divine judgment. Let him put on his robes of pomp and dignity. Let him dress himself in grandeur and majesty. Let his wrath pour out on everyone who is proud, and bring him low. What awful, holy irony! And yet how divinely just. If Job can sit in judgment on God, he is qualified to run all His affairs better than God does! He can put down the proud rebellion of every evildoer and bring men into the dust before him. Has he done that with his own proud and rebellious heart? Has he humbled even his friends? How much less the whole world.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why this is not only Job's problem

The verse exposes a rule that reaches far past one man's story.

Whenever anyone pleads for the flesh, for anything merely human — righteousness, wisdom, or strength — the plea can only stand by condemning God.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Two options, and only two

If God's verdict on us stands, our own verdict on ourselves must fall. One writer shows where the wrong answer leads.

How pointless to think God is at fault! How impossible to find anything but perfection in the Holy One! Do that, and you will indeed silence all the harps of heaven, darken its blessed light, and bring disaster and ruin everywhere... But it is an old argument, and a common one: "Will you condemn me that you may be in the right?" We must do that, or else submit to that judgment of God ourselves. For it is written of us, "None is righteous, no, not one." It is written too that "whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God."

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

What Job repented of

Job's later repentance is often misread as sorrow over scandalous sin. His own life rules that out.

Was he deeply sorry for a life of open sin and immorality? Oh no, this was not Job's case at all. He was a true man of God, and had lived one of the most moral and upright lives on record. Like Paul, as far as his life among men went, he was blameless, in a way that not one in ten thousand can speak of. Then what did he repent of? He repented of this — his striving to establish his own righteousness. God was now revealed to him, and he hated himself.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

The right thing, said at last

God's question aims at a reversal, and Job makes it in the end.

Job had said what was right in his last words, his answer to Jehovah's appeal to him. There God brought him into His presence... Now Jehovah brings the depths of his heart to light. Now he himself had got there at last... Job justifying God at his own expense. Job maintaining, not his righteousness now, but his own nothingness and vileness in dust and ashes before God. He owns without reserve that God is perfectly right.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- The charge. Job's complaint hid a conclusion: undeserved suffering meant an unjust God. To keep his own righteousness, Job had to deny God's.

- The mirror. God answers by offering Job the throne: if he can judge God, let him dress in majesty and humble every proud man on earth.

- The rule. Any plea built on human righteousness, wisdom or strength can only stand by putting God in the wrong.

- The choice. Either we condemn God, or we accept His verdict — that no one is righteous and every mouth is stopped.

- The turn. Job's repentance was not about gross sin. It was about trying to establish his own righteousness. He ends by justifying God at his own expense.

Job 40:9 · Darby

Hast thou an arm like God? or canst thou thunder with a voice like him?

God has already walked Job through the wonders of creation. Now He turns from the world outside to the man himself. Has Job the power that would qualify him to judge God's ways? The question is not about Job's arguments but about his arm.

The Charge Behind the Question

God's question replies to something buried in Job's complaints.

God is not crushing His poor foolish servant, but appealing to his reason as well as his conscience. ... Will he set aside God's righteous judgment, and condemn God so that he may establish a petty human righteousness? This is really what lay at the bottom of Job's complaints. He was suffering affliction he did not deserve — a righteous man, treated as though he were unrighteous. So the conclusion was unavoidable: the One afflicting him was unjust! The Lord would press home upon Job how serious this sin was. He has dared to judge God — on what grounds? Has he divine power and majesty? Can he speak in a voice of thunder?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

An Arm Like God

Job has already failed the test of wisdom. So God moves to a second measure: strength. The verse uses El, one of the Bible's names for God.

Wisdom goes beyond power, and nowhere more than in moral ways. Perhaps then, if Job fails here, he can compare in strength. Has he an arm like El? Does he thunder with a voice like His? Let us see him dress himself in majesty, grandeur, honour and beauty. What! That poor object of pity!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Thunder Only God Can Make

Men do raise their voices against what God does.

God's thunder is certainly heard, though He Himself is not seen. Men may lift up their voices in protest at His sovereign actions, but "who can thunder with a voice like His?" In the end, His voice will completely overpower the combined voices of all mankind.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Majesty and the Ash Heap

The verses after this one invite Job to dress in splendour and rule. Set that picture beside the man God is speaking to.

Had his own right hand even stopped the raiders who drove away his possessions? Or turned aside the storm that swept away his children? He had needed a piece of broken pottery to scrape himself. His clothing was sackcloth, not glory and majesty. His seat was the ashes of a ruined life, not the throne of glory. Is it cruel of the Lord to deal like this with a poor heart-broken creature? Rather let us ask: would it have been kindness to leave him holding his pride around him like a garment, and complaining bitterly against the Almighty? Pride can only be brought low in one way — by being brought face to face with its nothingness in the presence of the majesty and boundless goodness of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The invitation hides a test.

If Job can sit in judgment on God, he surely is qualified to run all His affairs better than He does! He can crush the proud rebellion of every evildoer and bring men into the dust before him. Has he done that with his own proud and rebellious heart? Has he humbled even his friends? How much less the whole world.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Asks

So why does God display His power at all?

Men talk as if God's purpose was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us before Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God? ... He would turn us away from ourselves to trust in Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not by My Own Right Hand

The challenge ends by asking what Job's own hand can do.

Could Job's right hand save him? No more than he could humble everyone who is proud. Job had to learn that only the living God is the Saviour. He saves, not those who deserve it, but those who are humbled to the dust, so that they recognise they deserve nothing but judgment. God saves by grace, through the great value of the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus at Calvary. Of course at that time Job knew nothing of that great sacrifice, but he could still know that he was a sinner, dependent only on the grace of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- The charge. Job claimed to be righteous while God wronged him. That claim put God in the wrong — so God asks what power gives Job the right to judge Him.

- The arm. Job failed the test of wisdom, so God measures him by strength instead. Set beside El, he has no arm to show.

- The voice. Men protest against God's dealings. His thunder will one day drown out every voice raised against Him.

- The ashes. The man invited to put on majesty sat in sackcloth on ashes. He scraped himself with broken pottery. His own right hand had saved nothing.

- The aim. God shows His power not to crush Job. He turns Job from himself to the God who saves by grace everyone humbled to the dust.

Job 40:10 · Darby

Deck thyself now with glory and excellency, and clothe thyself with majesty and splendour.

God speaks to Job out of the storm. He does not answer Job's questions about suffering. He hands him a challenge instead. Job sits in ashes, scraping his sores, and God tells him to put on the clothing of God Himself. Why say that to a man already broken?

The charge underneath the challenge

The command to put on glory follows a question about Job's righteousness. One writer sees the appeal aimed above all at Job's conscience.

God is not crushing His poor foolish servant, but appealing to his reason as well as his conscience. Job has already learned God's power, wisdom and goodness, and in some measure he has always known them. But this appeal is above all to his conscience. Will he set aside God's righteous judgment and deny it? Will he condemn God so that he can set up a petty human righteousness of his own? This is what lay at the bottom of Job's complaints. He was suffering affliction he did not deserve. He was a righteous man, yet he was treated as though he were unrighteous. So the conclusion could not be avoided — the One afflicting him was unjust!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The absurdity of the picture

One writer renders the four words of the verse as "majesty, grandeur, honour and beauty" — royal robes. Put them on the man they were offered to, and the picture becomes painful.

Perhaps then, if Job fails here, he can compare in strength. Has he an arm like God's? Does he thunder with a voice like His? Let us see him dress himself with majesty, and grandeur, and honour, and beauty. What! that poor object of pity! Let him pour out the outbursts of his anger. What! that miserable, broken sufferer!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

An invitation to the throne

These robes are not just for show. Whoever wears them must then deal with every proud man. So the offer is God's own seat, on the terms Job's own words implied.

If he really is qualified for that, Jehovah is in effect inviting him to take his seat on the throne of divine judgment. Let him put on his robes of splendour and dignity. Let him dress himself in grandeur and majesty. Let his anger pour out on everyone who is proud, and bring him low. What awful, holy irony! And yet how just it is. If Job can sit in judgment on God, then surely he is qualified to run all God's affairs better than He does!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Garments that fit only one wearer

Scripture uses this language of God. Set it beside Job's actual clothing, and the question answers itself.

Can such language be used of Job? — "O LORD my God, you are very great! You are clothed with splendor and majesty, covering yourself with light as with a garment" (Ps. 104:1-2). "Those who walk in pride he is able to humble" (Dan. 4:37). If so, then Jehovah Himself will be the first to praise him, and to confess that he is able to help himself. But had his own right hand even stopped the raiders who drove away his possessions? or turned aside the storm that swept away his children? Sadly, all he had was a piece of broken pottery to scrape himself with. His garment was sackcloth, not glory and majesty. His seat was the ashes of a ruined life, not the throne of glory.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why this is kindness

The obvious objection is that such irony is harsh. One writer answers it by asking what the alternative would have been.

Is it cruel of Jehovah to deal like this with a poor heart-broken creature? Ask instead: would it have been kindness to leave him wrapped in his pride like a garment, hurling complaints at the Almighty? Only one thing brings pride down: coming face to face with its own nothingness before the majesty and boundless goodness of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One garment must come off before another goes on. Job is wearing pride, and the challenge strips it away.

The reader's share in it

God spoke this command to one man. The weakness it exposes belongs to everyone.

The irony of such words is evident; Job needed humbling himself. How could he even hope to humble others? But there are many proud people today. We are helpless to humble any of them, but God will bring down the pride of everyone to the dust.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Robes — the verse offers Job a wardrobe of majesty, dignity, glory and splendour. Scripture puts that clothing on God.

- Throne — to wear it is to take the seat of judgment. Job's complaints had already claimed that seat.

- Mirror — the offer works by contrast. Job's real clothing was sackcloth, his tool a piece of broken pottery, his seat the ashes.

- Kindness — the irony is mercy, not cruelty. Pride only comes off when it stands beside the majesty and goodness of God.

- Reach — no one can humble the proud, in the world or in themselves; God alone brings pride down to the dust.

Job 40:11 · Darby

Cast abroad the ragings of thine anger, and look on every one that is proud, and abase him

God answers Job out of the storm. He does not explain Himself. Instead He tells Job to put on the robes of divine majesty and deal with every proud man on earth. To abase the proud means to bring them low. This is not a job God expects Job to do. It is a mirror held up to a man who had been judging God's rule while sitting on an ash heap.

The throne Job is offered

The line follows a summons to put on splendour, and the words carry the sense of flinging out anger in every direction and then looking each proud man in the face until he bows:

Put on then majesty and grandeur, and honour and beauty put on; scatter abroad the outbursts of your anger, see every proud one, and humble him; see every proud one — make him bow, and tread down the wicked in their place.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What is being handed over is not a chore but a position. One writer reads the whole passage as an offer of God's own seat:

Then He tells him: "Adorn yourself with majesty and dignity; clothe yourself with glory and splendour." Dress yourself in majesty and power. Come and take My place, and then, dressed like this, let Job be in God's place, rule and deal with proud man and the evildoers.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What Job claimed

The offer only makes sense against what Job had been saying. His complaint had a conclusion buried inside it:

Will he set aside and deny God's righteous judgment, and condemn God so that he can set up a petty human righteousness? For this is really what lay at the bottom of Job's complaints. He was suffering affliction which he did not deserve. He was a righteous man, treated as though he were unrighteous. The conclusion then was unavoidable — the One who was afflicting him was unjust!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The irony of the command

If Job can sit in judgment on God's rule, he must be fit to run it. Read the command against the picture of the man who receives it:

Let us see him deck himself with majesty, and grandeur, and honour, and beauty. What! that poor object of compassion! Let him scatter abroad the outbursts of his anger. What! that woe-begone sufferer! Yes, if he dares to sit in judgment on God's dealings, let him first see every proud one and humble him, see every proud one — make him low, and tread down the wicked in their place.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The gap between the costume and the man is the whole argument:

Can such language be used of Job? — "You are clothed with splendour and majesty, covering yourself with light as with a garment" (Ps. 104:1-2). "Those who walk in pride He is able to humble" (Dan. 4:37). If so, then Jehovah Himself will be the first to praise him and confess that he is able to help himself. But had his own right hand even stopped the raiders who drove away his possessions? Or turned aside the storm that swept away his children? Sadly, he had needed a piece of broken pottery to scrape himself. His clothing was sackcloth, not glory and majesty. His seat was the ashes of a ruined life, not the throne of glory.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Who can bring pride down

The test exposes Job. It also shows who does hold this power:

The irony of such words is obvious; Job needed humbling himself. How could he even hope to humble others? But there are many proud people today. We are helpless to humble any of them, but God will bring down the pride of everyone to the dust.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Severity that is kindness

The tone sounds harsh against a man already stripped of everything. One commentator meets that objection:

Is it cruel of Jehovah to deal like this with a poor heart-broken creature? Rather let us ask, would it have been kindness to leave him wearing his pride like a garment, railing against the Almighty? Pride can only be brought low this way — by being brought face to face with its nothingness in the presence of the majesty and boundless goodness of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Humble, or humbled

God humbles Job here because Job was not humble. There is a better road:

The invariable way of God is this: "He who humbles himself will be exalted," and faith alone gives humbling of self. There are two forms of it: the happiest of all is to be humble; the next best thing is to be humbled. It is better to be humble than to be humbled, but there is no comparison between being humbled and being lifted up. Humility is the effect of grace; being humbled is the effect of God's righteous government, where we are not humble.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- The claim. Job's complaint carried a buried verdict — that God was unjust — and the question about abasing the proud drags that verdict into the light.

- The offer. God does not argue. He offers Job His own place: put on majesty, and rule the proud. That is His answer to anyone who thinks he could run the world better.

- The irony. A man sits in sackcloth on an ash heap, scraping himself with broken pottery. God tells him to clothe himself in splendour and crush the wicked where they stand.

- The reach. Nobody can humble the proud — not Job, not us. God alone brings every proud person down to the dust.

- The kindness. God brings a man low out of kindness, not cruelty. Leaving him wearing his pride would have been the cruel thing. Better still to be humble before God does the humbling.

Job 40:12 · Darby

Look on every one that is proud, bring him low, and tread down the wicked in their place

God is still speaking out of the storm, and He hands Job something he never asked for: His own throne. The order to bring every proud man low is not advice for living — it is a test of whether Job can do God's work.

The throne offered

The verse sits inside an invitation. God dresses Job in majesty and tells him to judge the world — the work Job's complaints implied he could do better.

Suppose Job really is qualified in this way. Then Jehovah in effect invites him to take his seat on the throne of divine judgment. Let him put on his robes of splendour and dignity. Let him dress himself in grandeur and majesty. Let the outpourings of his wrath flow out on everyone who is proud, and bring him low. What awful, holy irony! And yet how divinely just. If Job can sit in judgment on God, he surely is qualified to run all His affairs better than He does! He can put down the proud rebellion of every evildoer, and bring men into the dust before him. Has he done that with his own proud and rebellious heart? Has he humbled even his friends? How much less the whole world.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The charge exposed

The challenge aims at something Job had said. His complaint carried a conclusion he may never have meant to state.

Will he cancel and deny God's righteous judgment, and condemn God, to establish a petty human righteousness? This is really what lay at the bottom of Job's complaints. He was suffering affliction that he did not deserve. He was a righteous man, yet he was treated as though he were unrighteous. The conclusion, then, was unavoidable — the One who was afflicting him was unjust!

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Irony aimed at pride

God is not asking Job to try this. He is showing Job what Job is not.

It is divine irony, but it was needed to humble Job still further. He had been so proud. He had defended his righteousness so stubbornly, justifying himself and accusing God. How could he do what Jehovah asked him to do?

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Job's condition at that moment sharpens the contrast. The man told to put down the wicked of the earth was helpless.

There was Job — a poor, miserable man in the greatest possible bodily misery. All his flesh was corrupt, and the worms were already feeding on him before he had died. "Adorn yourself with majesty and dignity; clothe yourself with glory and splendor." Why do you not put down all the bad people in the world? But he was entirely dependent on God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who brings the proud low

The command Job cannot obey is one God carries out Himself — and still does.

The irony of such words is obvious; Job needed humbling himself. How could he even hope to humble others? But there are many proud people today. We are helpless to humble any of them, but God will bring down the pride of everyone to the dust.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

From weakness to grace

The failure runs deeper than judging the proud. It reaches to whether Job can rescue himself at all.

Could Job's right hand save him? No more than he could humble everyone who is proud. Job had to learn that only the living God is the Saviour. He saves — not those who deserve it, but those who are humbled to the dust and know they deserve nothing but judgment. God saves by grace, through the great value of the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus at Calvary. Of course, at that time Job knew nothing of that great sacrifice. But he could still know that he was a sinner, dependent only on the grace of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Severity that is kindness

On its own the speech sounds harsh. Seen as treatment, it is kindness.

Is it cruel of Jehovah to deal like this with a poor, heart-broken creature? Instead, let us ask: would it have been kindness to leave him wearing his pride like a garment, and railing against the Almighty? Pride can be brought low in only one way. It must come face to face with its own nothingness, in the presence of the majesty and boundless goodness of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Brought low — the throne. God offers Job His seat and His robes. Job's complaints had already assumed he could run God's affairs better.

- Brought low — the charge. Under the complaint lay the claim that God was unjust and Job was right; the challenge drags it into the open.

- Brought low — the irony. The words are irony. Job's own broken body answers them: he cannot humble the proud, for he is one of them.

- Brought low — the reach. No one can bring the proud down, but God will bring the pride of everyone to the dust.

- Brought low — the grace. The hand that cannot save belongs to the very person God saves. He saves those humbled to the dust, who know they deserve nothing.

Job 40:13 · Darby

Hide them in the dust together; bind their faces in secret.

God is still speaking out of the storm. He hands Job a challenge: if you are fit to judge Me, take My throne and do My work. This verse names the last act of that work — burying the proud out of sight. Can any man's arm do it?

The task God sets before Job

This demand closes a string of commands. One writer sets out the whole passage, ending with what God promises if Job can carry it out:

So put on majesty and grandeur; put on honour and beauty. Pour out the outbursts of your anger. Look at everyone who is proud, and humble him. Look at everyone who is proud — make him bow. Tread down the wicked where they stand. Hide them in the dust together; bind their faces in secret. Then even I will praise you, that your right hand saves you.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The last phrase follows an older translation; the ESV reads "bind their faces in the world below." God never means Job to take the offer up. Another writer reads it as irony aimed at the fault Job had shown:

It is Divine irony, but it was needed to humble Job still more. He was so proud. He had so stubbornly defended his own righteousness, justifying himself and accusing God. How could he do what Jehovah asked him to do?

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

An invitation to the throne

These commands are, in effect, an offer of God's own seat. It is a just offer, because Job had already claimed that seat by his words:

If he really is qualified for this, Jehovah is inviting him, so to speak, to take his seat on the throne of divine judgment. What a terrible, holy irony! And yet how just it is. If Job can sit in judgment on God, he is surely qualified to run all His affairs better than He can! He can put down the proud rebellion of every evildoer, and bring men into the dust before him. Has he done that with his own proud and rebellious heart? Has he humbled even his friends? How much less the whole world.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The gap between the man and the task shows in his body. He must clothe himself in splendour while he sits in ashes:

But had his own right hand stopped the raiders who drove away his possessions? Had it turned back the storm that swept away his children? Sadly, all it had taken up was a piece of broken pottery to scrape himself with. His clothing was sackcloth, not glory and majesty. His seat was the ashes of a ruined life, not the throne of glory.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Severity that is mercy

Words this sharp, spoken to a man who has lost everything, look cruel. The alternative would have been worse:

Is it cruel of Jehovah to deal like this with a poor, broken-hearted man? Let us ask instead: would it have been kindness to leave him wearing his pride like a garment, and raging against the Almighty? There is only one way to bring pride low. It must be brought face to face with its own nothingness in the presence of the majesty and boundless goodness of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Pride is not a sinner's problem only

Job was a godly man, which is what makes this exchange so searching. What God exposes here lives in believers too, and grace produces the opposite:

What a proud thing the flesh is, and no better in the saint than in the sinner! ... Grace produces the very opposite in every soul born of God. It makes a person ready to take God's side against self, to sit in judgment on his own ways, and to bow to His word, however scorching its blast on every way or word, thought and feeling.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The hand that can save

The challenge ends in the next verse: if Job can bury the proud, God will admit that Job can save himself. Job can do neither.

Could Job's right hand save him? (v.14) No more than he could humble everyone who is proud. Job had to learn that only the living God is the Saviour. He saves, not those who deserve it, but those who are humbled to the dust and recognise that they deserve nothing but judgment.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same writer turns the verse outward. Everyone reaches this dust; the only question is when.

However strong a person's pride may be, everyone will be humbled down to the dust in the end... How much better to humble ourselves before God now, in sober self-judgment, before God has to bring on us the humiliation of being cast into the lake of fire!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Dust as challenge — God tells Job to bury the proud out of sight. Only God can do that work, and He offers it to a man who had judged His ways.

- Dust as irony — God tells a man in sackcloth and ashes to robe himself in majesty. The mismatch is the argument.

- Dust as mercy — leaving Job wrapped in his pride would not have been kind. Only God's majesty brings pride face to face with its own nothingness.

- Dust as warning — the flesh is no better in a believer than in an unbeliever. Every proud person comes to the dust: now by self-judgment, or later by judgment.

- Dust as salvation — Job's right hand could not humble the proud or save him. God saves people brought low enough to admit they deserve nothing.

Job 40:14 · Darby

Then will I also praise thee, because thy right hand saveth thee.

God does not answer Job's questions here — He hands Job the throne and dares him to sit on it. If Job can clothe himself in majesty and bring down every proud man, God Himself will agree that Job's own hand can save him.

The challenge is irony

The verse is the last line of a dare that God never expected Job to take up.

The conviction that now had seized Job had to be driven into him yet more deeply. So God challenged him again. He had been guilty of setting aside the judgment of God, and condemning Him to maintain his own righteousness. This was really a very great sin, and in verses 9-14 God condemns him in a most searching way. The language is ironic. Let him not argue with God. Let him turn his attention instead to the proud and powerful among men, and bring them low. Then it might be admitted that he could save himself.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The irony is not cruelty for its own sake. It has a target.

It is divine irony, but needed in order to humble Job still more. He who was so proud and had so stubbornly defended his righteousness in self-justification and God-accusation, how could he do what Jehovah asked him to do?

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

An invitation to God's throne

Job had judged how God runs the world. So let Job run it.

If he is qualified for this, Jehovah in effect invites him to take his seat on the throne of divine judgment. Let him put on his robes of splendour and dignity. Let him dress himself in grandeur and majesty. Let the outpourings of his wrath flow out on everyone who is proud, and bring him low. What awful, holy irony! And yet how divinely just. If Job can sit in judgment on God, he surely is qualified to manage all His affairs better than He does! He can crush the proud rebellion of every evildoer, and bring men into the dust before him. Has he done so with his own proud and rebellious heart? Has he humbled even his friends? How much less the whole world.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The state of the man being challenged

Set the demand beside the man it was addressed to, and the answer gives itself.

There was Job — a poor, miserable man with all his flesh rotting and the worms feeding on him before he had even died — in the greatest possible bodily misery. "Adorn yourself with majesty and dignity; clothe yourself with glory and splendor." "Pour out the overflowings of your anger, and look on everyone who is proud and abase him." Why do you not put down all the bad people in the world? But he was entirely dependent on God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What his own right hand had actually done

The phrase "your own right hand can save you" is measured against Job's real record, not his arguments.

If so, then Jehovah Himself will be the first to praise him, and to admit that he is able to rescue himself. But had his own right hand even stopped the raiders who drove away his possessions? Or turned aside the storm that swept away his children? Sadly, it had taken a piece of broken pottery to scrape himself with. His clothing was sackcloth, not glory and majesty. His seat was the ashes of a ruined life, not the throne of glory.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The opposite of what grace produces

The flesh's readiness to justify itself at God's expense is contrasted with what God works in a soul He has given new life.

What a proud thing the flesh is, and no better in the saint than in the sinner! Would Job also put God's moral dealings on trial and set them aside? Worse, would he condemn Him to have himself justified? Grace produces exactly the reverse in every soul born of God. It gives a readiness to take His part against self, and to sit in judgment on one's own ways. It bows to the word, no matter how harshly that word blows on every way or word, thought and feeling. That is repentance.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Only God saves

If Job's right hand cannot save him, someone else must.

Could Job's right hand save him? No more than he could humble everyone who is proud. Job had to learn that only the living God is the Saviour. He saves, not those who deserve it, but those who are humbled to the dust and recognise they deserve nothing but judgment. God saves by grace, through the great value of the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus at Calvary. Of course, Job knew nothing of that great sacrifice at that time. But he could still know that he was a sinner, dependent only on the grace of God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- The dare — God offers Job His own throne and wrath on one condition: bring down every proud man. The offer is irony, aimed at a man who had judged God's dealings.

- The exposure — Job's right hand had not stopped the raiders or the storm. Sackcloth and ashes, not majesty, were Job's actual clothing and seat.

- The sin named — Job had set aside God's judgment and condemned Him to keep his own righteousness intact.

- The reversal — Grace works the opposite instinct: taking God's side against self, judging one's own ways, and bowing to His word. That is repentance.

- The Saviour — No right hand saves itself. God saves by grace, and He saves those humbled to the dust who own they deserve nothing.

Job 40:15 · Darby

See now the behemoth, which I made with thee he eateth grass as an ox.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Job 40:16 · Darby

Behold now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the muscles of his belly.

God points Job to one huge beast, behemoth, and tells him to look at where its power sits. The question behind it is personal. If Job cannot match this creature, why is he arguing with the God who made it?

Which creature is behemoth

Commentators differ over which animal this is. One writer names the hippopotamus and corrects the name itself:

"Behemoth" means what is called the hippopotamus. It ought not to be called a river-horse at all, which is what "hippopotamus" means. It is a river-ox. It is like an ox rather than a horse... Many claim that "behemoth" means an elephant. But read the account and you will see it is very unlike an elephant. The one likeness is that it is a big creature with enormous strength, and beyond that, nothing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Others think the details of the description do not fit any animal alive today:

Some have thought this refers to a hippopotamus. But that animal has a small tail, while behemoth "moves his tail like a cedar" (v.17). Perhaps this animal has now become extinct, for its tail seems to resemble that of a dinosaur.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why the loins

Other passages use the same word for the loins. One writer gathers them, using an older translation that keeps the word "loins" throughout:

"Gird up now your loins like a man", God said to Job, twice, and to others also. Elijah girded up his loins and ran before Ahab (1 Kings 18:46). There are many other references, Behemoth for example... "his strength in his loins" (Job 40:16). But exactly the same word is used of the woman of worth (Proverbs 31:17)... Taken together they certainly confirm what we have always heard, that the loins are the seat of strength.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

The verse names the loins and the belly. The description that follows spreads the same note over the whole animal:

Every part of his body speaks of strength — loins and body, legs and bones, even tail, are alive with this power... His Creator gave him sharp sword-like teeth, and with them he mows down the grass like an ox. He is harmless too when not stirred up, for the other beasts play in the same pasture.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Only a creature

God sets this beast beside Job, and the comparison is the sting:

Behemoth then is a powerful, uncontrollable beast which lives for itself. How weak then is man compared with this beast and its marvellous strength. Yet it is only a beast and Job is a man. How detestable then must Job's pride and boasting appear in the sight of the Lord.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Strength that serves nobody

Strength on this scale might sound admirable. Notice what it is worth to anyone else:

He is an untameable, uncontrollable beast. He is of no use for man's service. The whole description gives one impression — absolute power used for utterly selfish ends. It lives for itself, refusing to yield its strength to the service of others.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Strength you trust in

The same writer turns the picture on the reader:

And yet he is only a creature, given superhuman strength by God for His all-wise purposes. Let Job consider this creature, self-sufficient and unstoppable. Let all who are tempted to trust in their own strength consider him too, whether strength of body, as here, or of heart and mind. How puny their own arm will appear.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Readings of the symbol

Some writers see more than an animal here, and they do not agree on what. One starts from the kind of man behemoth resembles:

The character of behemoth is like that of many strong, capable men. They know how to subdue others, but have no heart to help them... So behemoth seems to be specially symbolic of Antichrist. He is a land animal, and Antichrist will rise out of the land (of Israel), as Revelation 13:11 shows us... It is God who has made him, though he refuses to recognise God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another sees the two beasts of chapters 40 and 41 as pictures of evil working in two directions:

Behemoth is the enemy within us; leviathan is the enemy without us.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Made — behemoth is no rival to God. He is a creature God made, and that is what humbles Job.

- Strong — Scripture treats the loins as the seat of strength. Here every part, from bones to tail, says the same.

- Selfish — this strength serves no one. It cannot be tamed and lives only for itself.

- Searching — God sets the beast before everyone who trusts his own strength, of body or of mind. Their own arm looks small.

- Symbolic — commentators read the creature further. Some see a picture of Antichrist, others evil at work inside a man. All agree God made him.

Job 40:17 · Darby

He bendeth his tail like a cedar; the sinews of his thighs are woven together.

God points Job to one animal and walks through its body piece by piece. Verse 17 is part of that list: the tail, and the tightly knit sinews of the thighs. This is not a lesson in zoology. If Job cannot match a single creature God made, how can he argue with the Creator?

Which Creature?

God calls this animal behemoth. Commentators differ over which creature that is, and verse 17 is the reason. Many say it is the hippopotamus. One writer argues from its diet that the name means river-ox, not river-horse:

"Behold now behemoth, which I made with you" — when I made you I made him. "He eats grass as an ox." I have, therefore, good reason for saying that it is a river-ox, and not at all a river-horse.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Others say the tail in this verse rules that out:

Some have thought this refers to a hippopotamus, but that animal has a small tail, while behemoth "makes his tail stiff like a cedar" (v.17). Perhaps this animal has now become extinct, for its tail seems to resemble that of a dinosaur.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

An Anatomy of Power

The survey runs from loins to tail, and no part of this animal is weak:

Every portion of his anatomy speaks of strength — loins and body, legs and bones, and even tail, are alive with this power. So he is a chief of God's creatures, excelling in strength. His Creator gave him sharp, sword-like teeth, and with them he mows down the grass like an ox. He is harmless too when nothing stirs him up, since the other animals play beside him in the same pasture.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That strength is never turned to anyone's benefit:

In other words, he is an untamable, uncontrollable beast. He is of no use for man's service. The entire description gives the impression of absolute power used for utterly selfish ends. It lives for itself, refusing to yield its strength to the service of others.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Measure of Job

The same hand made both the animal and the man:

How weak man is compared with this beast and its marvellous strength! Yet it is only a beast and Job is a man. How abominable then must Job's pride and boasting appear in the sight of the Lord.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The creature's strength is a gift from God, and the lesson reaches past bodily strength:

And yet he is only a creature. God gave him superhuman strength for His own all-wise purposes. Let Job, and everyone tempted to trust his own strength, look at this creature, self-sufficient and unstoppable. That strength may be strength of body, as here, or of heart and mind. How puny their own arm will look.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Still Only a Creature

However great the beast, God knit the sinews of verse 17. The whole picture stays in His hand:

Note the striking words, "he is the first of the ways of God" (v.19). God created him as an object lesson for us of unstoppable strength. Only the God who made him can bring him down to nothing — a picture of putting him under the judgment of the sword.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Picture of Pride

Commentators have long read a moral meaning in behemoth and in leviathan, the creature described next, and they offer it as likely rather than certain:

Both beasts stand for power and pride. So it does not seem entirely far-fetched to agree with another commentator, Wordsworth: "It seems probable that behemoth represents the Evil One at work in the animal and fleshly parts of man's own make-up, and that leviathan pictures the Evil One at work as the enemy outside him. Behemoth is the enemy inside us; leviathan is the enemy outside us."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Read that way, Job would find the creature's likeness in his own heart:

To Job, behemoth would stand for that creature of pride which thrives among people who profess to belong to God. In the pride of his own self-righteousness, "proclaiming himself to be God," he would catch glimpses of this evil thing. One day it would grow into a full and hideous falling away from God. What more dreadful exposure of the evil of pride could he, or we, have? Self-righteousness, self-seeking, pride of conduct or of character, denies its need of Christ and of God. Such is sin in the flesh — incorrigible and hideous. Who can subdue it or change its nature?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Who Holds the Reins

That question has an answer. No man can tame this beast, but it does not run free:

And yet behemoth is controlled, though not by man. God is over all... The Spirit will control the flesh, and while He lives in the Church He does not allow evil to develop fully. In a smaller way too, the Spirit controls and holds back the activity of the flesh. "Walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Made — God framed this beast, tail and sinew alike. Commentators differ on whether it is a hippopotamus or a creature now extinct, since a hippo's tail is nothing like a cedar.

- Massive — every part of the body is a study in strength, yet all of that power lives for itself and serves no one.

- Measured — set beside this creature, Job's arm looks tiny; so does anyone's strength of body, heart or mind.

- Mirrored — read as a picture, behemoth is the enemy inside us: self-righteousness and pride that denies its need of God.

- Mastered — what man cannot control, God controls. The Spirit holds the flesh in check, and only the God who made this beast can bring it down.

Job 40:18 · Darby

His bones are tubes of bronze, his members are like bars of iron.

God answers Job by describing an animal — its loins, its tail, and here its bones. What does He want a suffering man to learn from a skeleton of bronze and iron?

Which creature is this

Commentators have long debated what behemoth is. One reading takes it as a river-ox:

"Behemoth" means what is called the hippopotamus. We ought not to call it a river-horse at all, which is what "hippopotamus" means. It is a river-ox. It looks more like an ox than a horse, with its own odd features, and they are very odd... Many insist that "behemoth" means an elephant. But read the account and you will see it is very unlike an elephant, apart from being a big creature with enormous strength. Beyond that, nothing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer thinks no living animal fits:

Some have thought this refers to a hippopotamus, but that animal has a small tail, while behemoth "moves his tail like a cedar" (v.17). Perhaps this animal has now become extinct, for its tail seems to resemble that of a dinosaur.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Bones of bronze

The metal named here carries a settled meaning across Scripture:

These verses, and others we could add, make the symbolic meaning of the copper clear. It stands for durability, strength, and refusal to bend, whether in protection, in chains, or in war. Applied to the nature of God, it would declare His unchanging character, His strength, and the impossibility of escaping His judgment. On the other side, it would declare the safety of those He protects.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Note: older translations call this metal "brass" or "copper"; the ESV reads "bronze."

Armoured, yet a grass-eater

The body is built for power, yet the diet is grass:

Huge as behemoth is, he eats plants like the ox. The elephant is vulnerable underneath, but here the sinews are of surpassing strength. He bends his tail like a cedar. The sinews of his thighs are knit tightly together, and his bones are like copper and iron. Yet, masterpiece as he is of God's ways, he has only a scythe-like tooth to graze the mountains, where all the beasts of the field play.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strength with an owner

Verse 18 belongs to a list running from loins to tail to bones. That list leads to a title in verse 19, and to a limit on it:

In behemoth every part of his body added to his exceptional strength (vv.16-18): his loins, his body, legs and bones and even his tail. Strikingly, the text says, "he is the first of the ways of God" (v.19). God has created him as an object lesson for us of resistless strength. Only the God who made him can bring him down to nothing.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Power that serves nobody

All that strength raises a question: what is it for?

In other words, he is an untamable, uncontrollable beast. He is of no use for man's service. The entire description gives the impression of absolute power used for utterly selfish ends. It lives for itself, refusing to yield its strength to the service of others.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The mirror held up to Job

This lesson in anatomy has a target — the man listening:

And yet he is only a creature. God gave him superhuman strength for His own all-wise purposes. Let Job look at this creature, self-sufficient and unstoppable. Let everyone tempted to trust his own strength look too — strength of body, as here, or of heart and mind. How small their own arm will seem.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Some go further. They read the beast as a picture of something worse than animal pride, though only as a suggestion:

Some have thought this creature must picture Satan, chief among God's creatures (Ezek. 28), outstanding in strength and pride... "It seems likely that behemoth stands for the Evil One at work in the animal and fleshly parts of man's own make-up, and that leviathan pictures the Evil One at work as man's enemy outside him. Behemoth is the enemy within us; leviathan is the enemy without us."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Made — behemoth is God's creature; commentators differ on whether it is a river-ox, a hippopotamus, or an animal now extinct.

- Metal — bronze and iron speak of durability and strength; this frame will not bend.

- Chief — every part, down to the tail, adds strength, so that he heads God's works — yet only his Maker can bring him down.

- Useless — all that power serves itself alone. It yields nothing to anyone. That is strength at its most worthless.

- Mirror — Job, and everyone trusting his own strength of body or mind, should look at those iron limbs and see how small his own arm is.

Job 40:19 · Darby

He is the chief of God's ways he that made him gave him his sword.

God answers Job by pointing him to a single animal — behemoth — and calls it the first of His works, then adds a puzzling line about a sword. Why answer a suffering man with a beast, and whose sword is it?

The Title: First of God's Ways

The phrase marks this creature out as the peak of what God made among the animals. Other translations read "the chief of God's ways" where the ESV has "the first of the works of God." One writer takes it as a rank of greatness:

The Lord asks Job to consider the behemoth. It is certainly the hippopotamus (the Greek name means river-horse). A description of this powerful beast follows. He calls the behemoth the "chief of the ways of God," one of His greatest works in animal creation. The behemoth is one of Job's fellow-creatures, "which I made along with you."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The title is not for admiration only. It is teaching material:

In behemoth every part of his body added to his exceptional strength (vv.16-18) — his loins, his body, his legs and bones, and even his tail. The text says of him, "he is the first of the ways of God" (v.19). God has created him as an object lesson for us of strength that nothing can resist. Only the God who made him can bring him down to nothing, and so, as a picture, put him under the judgment of the sword.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Sword: Two Readings

Commentators differ on the second half of the verse. Grant, above, reads it as God's power to destroy what He made. Another writer argues the sword is not aimed at the beast but given to it:

I think the words in verse 19 do not mean that God brings the sword near to kill him. They mean that the One who made him gave him a sword — really a scythe. It is a scythe more than a sword, and that is pretty much what the tusk of a hippopotamus is. It has great power for splitting things of all kinds, and for cutting.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

On either reading the weapon comes from the Maker's hand.

The Lesson: Strength That Shames Job's Own

God made this creature alongside Job. That comparison is the point of the whole description:

And yet he is only a creature. God gave him strength greater than any man's, for His own all-wise purposes. Let Job look at this creature, self-sufficient and unstoppable. Let everyone look who is tempted to trust his own strength — strength of body, as here, or of heart and mind. How weak their own arm will look then.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The comparison does not stop at strength. It reaches Job's pride:

So behemoth is a powerful, uncontrollable beast that lives for itself. How weak man looks next to this beast with its amazing strength! Yet it is only a beast, and Job is a man. How hateful, then, Job's pride and boasting must look to the Lord.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Character: Power Without Service

Being first among God's works is not the same as being useful. This creature's greatness is turned inward:

In other words, he is an untamable, uncontrollable beast. He is of no use for man's service. The entire description gives the impression of absolute power used for utterly selfish ends. It lives for itself, refusing to yield its strength to the service of others.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That turns into a question for the man listening — and for the reader:

So he is untameable and uncontrollable. Man could do nothing with him, as he does with an ox or a horse. He was also completely selfish: he was of no use to any man or animal. Would Job want to be like this — strong and self-confident, with no real aim of helping others?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Wider Picture: A Figure of Pride

Some see more than an animal here, though only as a picture, not a fixed identification:

Some have thought this creature must stand for Satan, in his character as the chief of God's creatures (Ezek. 28), outstanding in strength and pride. The same would be true of leviathan, in the next chapter. Both beasts stand for power and pride.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer applies this same verse to the worst evil the Bible predicts. Even that evil is still something God made:

Antichrist himself is still a creature of God and in His hand, with all the powers and abilities he twists to his own ruin. As God says of behemoth (Job 40:19), "the One who made him can bring His sword near to him."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Made. God calls behemoth the first of His works — one of His greatest animals, and Job's fellow-creature.

- Armed. Its weapon comes from its Maker. Commentators differ: is the sword the tusk God gave it, or the judgment God can bring against it?

- Unstoppable. God set behemoth before Job as an object lesson in strength nothing can resist. Anyone who trusts his own arm — body, heart or mind — should see how small it is.

- Selfish. All that power serves no one: untameable, of no use to man or beast, living only for itself.

- Still a creature. However great or evil the strength — even Antichrist's — it remains made, and in the hand of the One who made it.

Job 40:20 · Darby

For the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.

God answers Job by pointing at one huge animal, called behemoth. This verse tells us where that animal feeds. Why answer a broken, arguing man with a picture of a grazing beast?

Where the Verse Sits

The final section of God's reply narrows from the whole sweep of creation down to two creatures. One writer marks the deliberate narrowing:

Again, in the last two chapters of Jehovah's answer (Job 40, Job 41), on which I must be very brief, we have God surveying, not the whole realm of nature, but quite enough, and more than enough, to convict Job of ignorance and incapacity to speak before God. This he needed to learn in order that he might distrust himself as well as confide in God. In these He takes up, as we may see, only two of His creatures — one, a powerful beast of the earth, in Job 40; the other, an equally mighty monster of the deep, in Job 41. There is behemoth on the one hand, and leviathan on the other.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Mountains as His Pasture

The mountain is not his home, but he can go there for his food. One writer follows the line phrase by phrase:

"The mountains yield food for him" — he can go to the mountain nearby if he likes — "where all the wild beasts play. He lies under the shady trees" — that is where he loves to be — "hidden among the reeds and in the marsh."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer notes what he grazes with, and why the animals nearby are safe:

His Creator gave him sharp teeth like swords, and with them he mows down the grass like an ox. He is harmless too when he is not stirred up, for the other beasts play in the same pasture. He lies down in the shade and takes his ease. He fears nothing, even if a raging flood should try to swallow him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Fed, and Therefore Not Self-Made

The mountains do not simply happen to grow grass. The supply is traced back to God, and the beast's ease is the point of the picture:

God has supplied food for him too (v.20). He could lie down without fear of anything, though other beasts were all around him. He is the very picture of self-confident power. Even the river may rage while he is at peace (v.23).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Strength That Serves No One

One writer sums up what such an animal is good for:

In other words, he is a beast no one can tame or control. He is of no use for man's service. The whole description gives the impression of absolute power used for completely selfish ends. It lives for itself, and refuses to give its strength to the service of others.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same writer then puts Job, and us, beside this creature:

And yet he is only a creature. God gave him this superhuman strength for His own all-wise purposes. Let Job look at this creature, and let everyone else who is tempted to trust his own strength look too — strength of body, as here, or of heart and mind. Nothing can resist him, and he needs no one. Next to that, how weak their own arm will look.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Which Animal?

Commentators differ on what this animal is. One writer argues it is the hippopotamus, and says the name points to an ox rather than a horse:

"Behemoth" means the animal we call the hippopotamus. We should not call it a river-horse at all, which is what "hippopotamus" means. It is a river-ox. It is like an ox rather than a horse... Many insist that "behemoth" means an elephant. But when you read the account you will see it is very unlike an elephant. It is a big creature with enormous strength, and beyond that, nothing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer looks at the tail and suggests an animal no longer alive:

Some have thought this refers to a hippopotamus. But that animal has a small tail, while behemoth "moves his tail like a cedar" (v.17). Perhaps this animal has now become extinct, for its tail seems to resemble that of a dinosaur.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Point Is Not Nature Study

A verse about mountain pasture can easily be turned into a nature lesson. One writer warns that this reverses God's aim:

Men talk as if God's aim was only to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think Job stayed busy with behemoth or with leviathan after this? Not at all. He was busy with God, and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Fed. God supplies the grass on those mountains. Even the strongest creature eats from a table he did not set.

- Fearless. He lies down with no fear while other beasts play around him — the very picture of self-confident power.

- Useless. No one can tame him, and he is no use to anyone. All that strength is spent on himself.

- Mirrored. Job must look at strength that lives for itself. Beside it, his own arm looks small.

- Redirected. The beast is never the destination. God shows His work to turn us away from the work and onto Himself.

Job 40:21 · Darby

He lieth under lotus-bushes, in the covert of the reed and fen

Job 40 closes with God pointing Job to a single animal and describing, in detail, where it chooses to lie down. Job had spent chapters defending himself, and God answers by describing a beast at rest in the reeds — a creature Job could never subdue.

The creature in view

Commentators differ over which animal behemoth is. One of them tests the usual candidates against the description itself:

"Behemoth" means what is called the hippopotamus. It ought not to be called a river-horse at all, which is what "hippopotamus" means. It is a river-ox. It is like an ox rather than a horse... Many insist that "behemoth" means an elephant. But read the account and you will see it is very unlike an elephant. It is a big creature with enormous strength, and beyond that, nothing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where he chooses to lie

A beast this size could sleep anywhere. God notes the low, shaded ground he prefers:

He does not love to lie down on high ground. He lies under the lotus plants, where the reed and the marsh give him cover. The lotuses shade him, and so do the willows. No swelling floods startle him. He waits calmly even for a Jordan rushing at his mouth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rest without fear

Two things make that rest possible. He is fed, and nothing around him counts as a threat:

God has supplied food for him as well (v. 20), and he could lie down with nothing at all to fear, even though other beasts were all around him. He is the very picture of self-confident power. Even the river may rage while he is at peace (v. 23).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Strength that serves no one

That calm has a dark side. This animal spends all its power on itself.

In other words, he is an untamable, uncontrollable beast. He is of no use for man's service. The whole description gives one impression: absolute power spent on completely selfish ends. It lives for itself, refusing to yield its strength to the service of others.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Job cannot master this beast. Yet one thing is harder still to bring down:

He called Job's attention to behemoth and to leviathan — probably the hippopotamus and the crocodile. They had brute strength but no human intelligence. It would be more easy to subdue them than to bring down proud man.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The point aimed at Job

God does not display this picture for admiration. He holds it up against the man who had been arguing his case with Him.

And yet he is only a creature. God gave him this more-than-human strength for His own all-wise purposes. Let Job look at this creature, self-sufficient and unstoppable. Let everyone tempted to trust in his own strength look at it too — strength of body, as here, or of heart and mind. How weak their own arm will look.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Shame is not the only result. The God who can do everything has also taken trouble over man:

To an upright mind like Job's, these descriptions were well suited to overwhelm him. He who could do everything had stooped to make man the object of His ways on earth. He ordered all things to shape man into submission of heart to Himself... Job therefore should be deeply ashamed of his self-sufficiency.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a nature lesson

These chapters are often read as a celebration of wildlife. That misses what the description was for:

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A figure of pride

Some writers go further and read the beast as a picture of evil itself. They hold it as a possibility, not a settled reading:

Some have thought this creature must stand for Satan, as the chief of God's creatures, outstanding in strength and pride... "It seems likely that behemoth stands for the Evil One at work in the animal and fleshly parts of man's own make-up. Leviathan pictures the same Evil One at work as an enemy from outside. Behemoth is the enemy within us; leviathan is the enemy without us."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Setting — He does not pick the high ground. He lies down under the lotus shade, screened by reed and marsh, undisturbed even when the river floods.

- Ease — That rest is the whole portrait: fed, surrounded by other beasts, and afraid of nothing. Self-confident power at rest.

- Selfishness — The same strength is untamable and useless to anyone. It refuses to serve anyone else.

- Mirror — Job must weigh his own arm against a creature he cannot subdue. And proud man is harder to bring down than that beast.

- Aim — The description is not given so we study the animal, but so we stop studying ourselves. Job ended up occupied with God, not with behemoth.

Job 40:22 · Darby

Lotus-bushes cover him with their shade; the willows of the brook surround him.

God answers Job out of the storm. He does not explain his suffering. Instead He gives a long look at one animal — a huge beast He calls behemoth. The beast lies at ease in the shade of the lotus trees, and the willows of the brook close round him. Why does God answer a broken man's questions with a picture of a beast at rest, and what was Job supposed to see in it?

The creature in view

The verse names marsh plants — lotus and willow — so the beast belongs in wet ground by a stream. One writer reads that setting, and the animal's diet of grass, and calls him a river-ox rather than a river-horse, the hippopotamus others proposed.

"Behold now behemoth, which I made with you" — when I made you I made him. "He eats grass as an ox." I have, therefore, good reason for saying that it is a river-ox, and not at all a river-horse... "The mountains yield food for him" — he can go to the mountain if he likes, or stay near it — "where all the beasts of the field play. He lies under the shady trees" — that is where he loves to be — "in the cover of the reeds and the marsh."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Commentators differ. Another writer looks at the size of the tail and suggests the animal may no longer exist.

Some have thought this refers to a hippopotamus, but that animal has a small tail, while behemoth "moves his tail like a cedar" (v.17). Perhaps this animal has now become extinct, for its tail seems to resemble that of a dinosaur.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Ease without fear

The trees of the verse form a canopy over a creature at ease. Under it he feeds, harms nobody unless provoked, and fears nothing.

His Creator gave him sharp, sword-like teeth, and he mows down the grass like an ox. He is harmless too when not roused, for the other beasts play in the same pasture. He lies down in the shade, taking his ease; for he fears nothing, even if a raging flood should seek to engulf him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That untroubled rest has another side. Ask what use the animal is to anyone.

So no one can tame him or control him. Man could do nothing with him as he does with an ox or a horse. Also he was totally selfish: he was of no service to any man or animal. Would Job want to be like this, strong and self-confident, with no real aim of helping anyone?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God points to an animal

Readers easily stop at the wonder of the creature itself. God's aim runs the other way.

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He who made them? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A mirror held up to pride

Job had been defending himself. God sets this beast, lying safe in the shade, beside Job as a measure of his own strength.

And yet he is but a creature, endowed by God, for His all-wise purposes, with superhuman strength. Let Job look hard at this creature, self-sufficient and unstoppable. Let everyone tempted to trust his own strength look too — strength of body, as here, or of heart and mind. How puny will their own arm appear.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One writer goes further and reads the beast as a picture of pride.

To Job, behemoth would stand for that creature of pride which flourishes among the professed people of God. Self-righteousness, self-seeking, pride of conduct or of character, denies its need of Christ and of God. Such is sin in the flesh — incorrigible and hideous. Who can subdue it or change its nature?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What it produced in Job

The proof that the lesson landed is Job's own reply at the end. Studying the animal was never going to produce it.

"I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you." It was nothing external now; no mere distant rumour... Do you think that searching into the structure or habits of behemoth and leviathan would have led to anything of the sort? Certainly not. He had to do with God Himself, who used them for the express purpose, and had thereby turned Job from all to Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Shade. The lotus trees and willows shelter a beast lying at ease, afraid of nothing, not even a raging flood.

- Strength. That fearlessness rests on power no man can tame; no one puts him to work like an ox or a horse.

- Selfishness. Yet all that strength serves no one. The beast lives for itself.

- Mirror. God points Job, tempted to trust his own strength of body and mind, to this beast — and Job's own arm looks tiny.

- Sight. The creature was never the destination. God used it to turn Job from himself, until Job said his eye now saw God.

Job 40:23 · Darby

Lo, the river overfloweth -- he startleth not he is confident though a Jordan break forth against his mouth.

God answers Job by pointing at an animal He made, called behemoth. Verse 23 is the peak of that description: the river can rage, and the beast does not flinch.

The Picture in the Verse

One writer describes where this beast likes to lie down, and how it meets the flood there.

High ground is not where he loves to lie down. He lies under the lotuses, where the reed and the marsh give him cover. The lotuses are his shade, and the willows too. No swelling floods startle him: he waits calmly for a Jordan rushing to his mouth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The verse names the Jordan. One dictionary explains what its flooding meant to people who lived near it:

The 'SWELLING' of Jordan is mentioned as causing dangers or difficulties. It not only stopped people crossing at the usual fords. It also disturbed the wild beasts in their lairs on its banks, as is mentioned three times (Jeremiah 12:5; 49:19; 50:44).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Identity of Behemoth

Commentators differ on which animal this is. Some read the passage as a portrait of the hippopotamus, and of God's greatness in making it.

The Lord asks Job to consider the behemoth. It is surely the hippopotamus (the Greek word means river-horse). A description of this powerful beast follows. He calls the behemoth the "chief of the ways of God," one of His greatest works in animal creation. The behemoth is one of Job's fellow-creatures, "which I made as I made you." He has tremendous strength in his loins and legs. He rests under the shady trees and fears nothing.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Others object that the description does not fit that animal at all:

Some have thought this refers to a hippopotamus. But that animal has a small tail, while behemoth "moves his tail like a cedar" (v.17). Perhaps this animal is now extinct, since its tail seems to look like a dinosaur's.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

(Grant quotes an older translation of verse 17. The ESV reads, "He makes his tail stiff like a cedar.")

Either way, God made the creature, and Job could not tame it.

Calm in the Middle of a Flood

Verse 23 puts its weight on the beast's calm, not on the flood.

He is the very picture of self-confident power. Even the river may rage while he is at peace (v.23). He drinks in great amounts of water rather than be drowned in it.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Strength That Serves No One

But calm is not the same as good. One writer asks what the beast does with all that power.

In other words, he is an untamable, uncontrollable beast. He is of no use for man's service. The whole description gives the impression of absolute power used for completely selfish ends. It lives for itself, refusing to give its strength to the service of others.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Points to It

People often read these chapters as nature writing. One writer says that misses why God gave them.

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them? And what is man if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Mirror Held Up to Job

God sets this creature in front of Job as a measuring stick.

And yet he is only a creature, given by God, for His all-wise purposes, with superhuman strength. Let Job consider this creature, self-sufficient and unstoppable. Let everyone do the same who is tempted to trust in their own strength — strength of body, as here, or of heart and mind. How small their own arm will look.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

And the final sting is the comparison of ranks:

Behemoth then is a powerful, uncontrollable beast which lives for itself. How weak, then, is man compared with this beast that has such marvellous strength. Yet it is only a beast, and Job is a man. How hateful, then, must Job's pride and boasting appear in the sight of the Lord.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Flood. A flooding Jordan drove wild beasts from their lairs. This beast does not move.

- Confidence. Another animal would drown. This one drinks the water in. That is self-confident power.

- Selfishness. That power is untamable and useless to anyone; it lives for itself and will not lend its strength to serve.

- Smallness. Set beside such strength, the arm a man trusts in — body, heart, or mind — looks tiny.

- God. The beast is never the point. God shows His works to turn us from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. Job ended up occupied with God, not behemoth.

Job 40:24 · Darby

Shall he be taken in front? will they pierce through [his] nose in the trap?

God's answer to Job ends His description of behemoth with a hunter's question: can anyone catch this creature, or lead him about with a ring through his nose? Job had argued his case against the Almighty. Now God asks him a smaller question: can he master even one animal made alongside him?

The question of verse 24

The question closes a long description of the animal. God works down the body, part by part, before asking whether man has any hold on him.

Every part of his body speaks of strength. Loins and body, legs and bones, and even his tail are full of this power. He is a chief of God's creatures, excelling in strength. His Creator gave him sharp sword-like teeth, and he mows down the grass like an ox. He is harmless too when he is not roused, for the other beasts play in the same pasture. He lies down in the shade, taking his ease, for he fears nothing, even if a raging flood should try to swallow him. Can he be caught in a trap, like some smaller animal, or held with a cord and ring through his nostrils?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Which animal

Commentators differ over which animal behemoth is. One writer looks at the tail and doubts the usual answer.

Some have thought this refers to a hippopotamus. But that animal has a small tail, while behemoth "makes his tail stiff like a cedar" (v.17). Perhaps this animal has now become extinct, for its tail seems to resemble that of a dinosaur.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Strength that serves no one

The point of the unanswerable question is not zoology. It holds a mirror up to Job.

So he is untameable and uncontrollable. Man could do nothing with him as he does with an ox or a horse. Also he was totally selfish: he was of no service to any man or animal. Would Job want to be like this, strong and self-confident, with no real object of being of help to others?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The measure taken of Job

The comparison cuts in two directions at once. Job cannot handle the beast — and the beast, for all its power, ranks below him as a creature.

Behemoth then is a powerful, uncontrollable beast which lives for itself. How weak then is man compared with this beast that has such marvellous strength. Yet it is only a beast, and Job is a man. How hateful then must Job's pride and boasting appear in the sight of the Lord.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The challenge widens from animals to people.

Job however could not tackle leviathan or behemoth, nor could he subdue proud man. How then could he contend with God? This was powerfully driven home into his heart.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why God describes His creatures

So why does God describe these creatures at such length? One commentator warns that it is easy to miss the point.

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work, and what is man if he dares to judge such a God? … Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A picture beyond the animal

Some writers go further and read behemoth and leviathan as pictures of something more than animals. This is offered as a suggestion, not a settled reading.

So it does not seem far-fetched to say with Wordsworth, "It seems probable that behemoth represents the Evil One working in the animal and bodily side of man's own make-up. Leviathan pictures the Evil One at work as his enemy from outside. Behemoth is the enemy within us; leviathan is the enemy without us."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Uncatchable. No trap takes him by the eyes, no ring goes through his nose — the question expects the answer "no one."

- Untameable. Unlike an ox or a horse, no one harnesses this strength; it serves no man and no animal.

- Useless. Power that lives for itself is the picture held up to Job, with the quiet question of whether he would want to be like it.

- Unequal. Job cannot master a beast. He cannot humble proud men. So he cannot contend with God.

- Unforgettable. The aim was never to make Job a student of animals but to bow him before their Maker — which is exactly what happened.

Job 41:1 · Darby

Wilt thou draw out the leviathan with the hook, and press down his tongue with a cord?

God turns from behemoth to a creature of the water. The question He puts to Job sounds almost comic: could Job land this one on a fishing line, or pin his tongue down with a cord? The point is not the animal. It is the distance between a man's strength and God's.

The creature behind the question

Commentators take Leviathan to be the crocodile. The verse offers him ordinary fishing gear.

Leviathan was a water creature. He appears to be the crocodile, the most fearsome of all water animals — unless he was some similar animal that is now extinct. Job could use a hook to catch fish, but how futile the thought of a hook for a crocodile! No attack can get through his jaws or his nose. Could Job persuade him to answer softly and give in? The very appearance of the crocodile is hostile and intimidating. No one could ever tame him for play, as people tame some birds and animals, and certainly not as a pet for girls!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

This animal does not keep away from people.

In Job 41 comes a still longer description of "leviathan," and I understand that to be the crocodile. The crocodile is a very dangerous beast. It is not so shy of people; on the contrary, it preys on men, women, and children, if it can get hold of them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The edge in God's tone

God's tone here is sharp. Job had spoken as a man who could judge God's ways.

"Can you draw out Leviathan with a fishhook?" You who can do such wonders! You can talk about God. You can judge for God. You can find fault with God! Well, can you catch Leviathan with a hook? You ought to be able to do that. "Or press down his tongue with a cord?" Stay away from him! Do not fight him. "Behold, the hope of a man is false." Spears and arrows are nothing to him. Even a musket ball cannot pierce the skin of a crocodile.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a servant, not a pet, not a trade

The verse names a hook and a cord on the tongue. The questions after it run through every other way a man might master an animal.

Can a net or hook take him, or a line pressing down on his tongue? Can you tie him up like an ordinary fish, with a reed rope through the gills? Is he shy and eager to please, or loyal and obedient? Will he become a plaything, like a pet bird, to amuse the household? Is he a regular item in the markets, bought and sold? If he cannot be caught as a fish, can darts and weapons bring him down? Anyone who has tried it will remember the terrible fight, and never try it again.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From the creature to the Creator

The chapter is not really about the animal. The creature is an argument about its Maker.

If this is so with this mere creature, who can stand before the Creator? Who has first given to the LORD, that he can demand it back again? Or, as the apostle asks, "Who has given a gift to Him that he might be repaid?" (Rom. 11:35).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Job had wanted to argue his case with God.

Job however could not tackle Leviathan or behemoth, nor could he subdue proud man. How then could he contend with God? This was powerfully driven home into his heart.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A picture of pride and power

Commentators differ over how far this description reaches. Some see only a lesson from creation. Others see a picture of human power set against God.

This creature comes up out of the water, and so suggests the first Beast of Revelation 13, the great world-power. In behemoth we see the spirit of falling away from revealed truth in religion; in leviathan we see the same spirit in civil government. And it is not limited to nations wanting to be first. The same strong self-will, which puts up with no contradiction, shows up in the single person too — a refusal to be tamed or to submit to authority. Who has ever tied down and held the proud will of man?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Read that way, the description points past the animal — and back at Job himself.

Both the behemoth and the leviathan picture Satan, his character and his rule. He is king over all the sons of pride. Now see the conclusion Job could easily draw. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. The LORD has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out the depths of it. Job has cherished pride, the Devil's crime.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Hook. God offers Job ordinary fishing tackle for a creature no tackle can hold. That is the whole point of the question.

- Creature. Commentators take Leviathan to be the crocodile: no one can tame him, sell him, play with him, or fight him and want a second try.

- Creator. If no one can master the creature, who can stand before the Creator who made him?

- Pride. Read as a picture, the beast portrays self-will that submits to no authority — in world-powers, and in Job's own heart.

- Surrender. Job could not master the animal. He could not master proud man. So how could he contend with God? That was driven home into his heart.

Job 41:2 · Darby

Wilt thou put a rush-rope into his nose, and pierce his jaw with a spike?

God ends His questioning of Job with Leviathan, the last and greatest creature He names. This verse is one of a string of mocking questions: if Job cannot rope and lead this one creature, why is he arguing with the God who made it?

Fishing tackle against a monster

One writer hears God turning Job's own confidence back on him.

You who can do such wonders; you can talk about God, and judge for God, and find fault with God! Well, can you catch Leviathan with a hook? You ought to be able to do that. … Be off with you! Do not fight him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the rope and the hook mean

The questions of these verses run through the ordinary uses a man has for a fish or a pet.

Can he be captured with a net or hook, by a line pressing down on his tongue? Can he be tied up like an ordinary fish, with a rush rope passed through the gills? Is he timid and fawning, or loyal and obedient? Can he be made into a plaything, like a bird, to amuse the household?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One writer takes the creature to be a crocodile. The parts a fisherman grabs first are the parts no one can grab.

Job could use a hook to catch fish, but how pointless the thought of a hook for a crocodile! No attack of any kind can get through his jaws or his nose.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

From the creature to the Creator

The questions are not about wildlife. No man can answer one of them, and they all drive at a single conclusion.

If this is true of a mere creature, who can stand before the Creator? Who has first given to the Lord, that he can demand it back again?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Not a nature lesson

These chapters can read like poetry about the wonders of the animal world. One writer says that misses the point.

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us before Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them, and what is man if he dares to judge such a God? … Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with Leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Leviathan pictures

Writers agree the beast stands for something beyond itself, but they differ on what. Some read him as the adversary of God and man:

God now shows Job, under the figure of Leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one this king over all the children of pride is. … But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Others read him as human power in revolt. This writer sets Leviathan beside behemoth, the great creature God described just before:

If in behemoth we have the spirit of turning away from revealed truth in religion, in Leviathan we see that spirit in civil government. … This is not limited to nations. The same spirit of strong self-will, which will take no contradiction, shows itself in the individual too. It is an untamable refusal to submit to authority. Who has ever bound and held the proud will of man?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The hook God Himself puts in

Job cannot put a hook in this creature's nose. God says elsewhere what He will do to a proud king who raged against Him.

God's answer is, "Because you have raged against me and your complacency has come into my ears, I will put my hook in your nose and my bit in your mouth, and I will turn you back on the way by which you came" (Isaiah 37:29). Compare these words with God's words to Gog in Ezekiel 38:4, "I will turn you about and put hooks into your jaws, and I will bring you out."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Ridicule. The question mocks Job: a rope and a hook are fishing gear, and no attack gets through this creature's jaws and nose.

- Creature. No man can rope, lead or tame this one creature. So no man can stand before the One who made it.

- Creator. God's object in the whole description was to lead Job into complete dependence on Him.

- Pride. Commentators differ on what Leviathan pictures: Satan, human government in revolt, or the proud will no one has ever bound. All read him as pride that will not submit.

- Reversal. What no man can do, God does: He puts His own hook in the nose of the proud and turns them back the way they came.

Job 41:3 · Darby

Will he make many supplications unto thee? or will he speak softly unto thee?

God is questioning Job, and He turns to one more creature: leviathan. The question in this verse is absurd on purpose — would such a monster ever beg Job for mercy or speak softly to him? — and its point is not the animal, but the God who made it.

The Wording of the Question

The verse sits inside a long run of questions. God asks Job whether he can catch this creature, tame it, or sell it. Here is one writer's own rendering of those lines:

Do you put a rush rope in his nose, or pierce his jaw with a thorn? Will he beg you again and again? Will he speak tender words to you? Will he make a covenant with you? Will you take him as a slave forever? Will you play with him like a pet bird, or tie him up for your girls?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Language of Surrender

"Many pleas" and "soft words" are the language of a beaten enemy asking for terms. God asks Job to picture it, and the picture falls apart at once.

Job could use a hook to catch fish, but how useless the thought of a hook for a crocodile! (v.1). No attack can get through his jaws or his nose (v.2). Could Job persuade him to answer softly and so submit to him? (v.4). The very look of the crocodile is hostile and frightening.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The questions keep coming, and each one runs into the same wall.

Is he timid and cringing, or loyal and obedient? If he cannot be caught as a fish, can he be attacked with darts or weapons? Anyone who has tried it will remember the terrible battle, and never try again. Everyone who opposes him gives up in despair; no one dares stir him up or stand before him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From the Creature to the Creator

The argument does not stop at the animal. If one creature is this far beyond Job, what must its Maker be?

Like the behemoth, the leviathan is a strong beast that cannot be tamed… Then He declares that he is fierce, and that the very sight of him overwhelms a man. And if a creature is so mighty and strong, what must the One be who called this creature into existence? Verses 10 and 11 should be read: "Who then is able to stand before Me (the Creator)?… all beneath the heavens is Mine."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why God Points at His Works

Some read these chapters as nature writing. One writer says that this misses the reason God brought them up.

Men talk as if God's object was only to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God?… He would turn us away from ourselves to trust in Himself. Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Leviathan Stands For

Commentators differ on the identity of the animal and on how far it pictures something beyond itself. Some keep it plain and literal:

Well now, in Job 41, comes a still longer description of "leviathan," and I understand that to be the crocodile. The crocodile is a very formidable beast. It is not so shy of the human kind; on the contrary, it preys upon men, women, and children, if it can get hold of them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Others read the portrait as a picture of an enemy no human can negotiate with:

God now shows to Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one he is — this king over all the children of pride… But what could be God's purpose in describing the power of the enemy like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

The Comfort Hidden in the Terror

The picture is frightening. But notice who is painting it, and the fear turns to relief.

Now what a relief this is. Looked at in himself, the believer has no power to overcome Satan… Independence from God is what opened the door to Satan at the start. Simple dependence on God alone is what can shut it… It is very gracious of God to tell us how great the power of the enemy is. He does it so that we may know that our only resource is a firm trust in Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Question — God asks if leviathan will beg Job for mercy or speak softly to him. The answer is no, and it is meant to be obvious.

- Refusal — soft words would mean surrender. This creature surrenders to no one: not to hook, thorn, weapon or cage.

- Creator — if one made thing is beyond taming, the One who made it is beyond arguing with.

- Redirection — God describes the animal so that we will stop studying ourselves and look at Him.

- Dependence — God tells us how strong the enemy is, and that is a kindness. It drives the helpless to trust Him, and that trust is their only strength.

Job 41:4 · Darby

Will he make a covenant with thee? wilt thou take him as a bondman for ever?

God is questioning Job about leviathan — a beast he cannot catch, cannot fight, and cannot tame. Verse 4 asks whether this creature would ever come to terms with a man and serve him for life.

The creature in view

Writers usually identify leviathan with the crocodile. One follows God's questions from the creature back to its Maker.

The leviathan has generally been identified with the crocodile. Like the behemoth, the leviathan is a strong and untamable beast. Jehovah asks, Can you draw up leviathan with a hook? Can you pierce his jaw with a reed? Will he make a covenant with you? Will you take him for a servant forever? Then He declares that he is fierce, and even at the sight of him one is cast down. And if a creature is so mighty and strong, what must the One be who called this creature into existence?

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

No treaty, no service

A covenant needs two parties who agree on terms. A servant forever means one party holds the other for life. Leviathan gives neither, even to a man who could catch him.

But suppose he is caught. Is he soft and yielding, ready to serve forever? Can you play with him as you would with a bird or a deer, a toy for girls? No, he is no commodity for traders, no game for the hunter, no safe opponent in battle. The very sight of him might knock a man flat, and the man who would provoke him is reckless. Yet what is that compared with standing before God? Who has ever given anything to Him that He should repay it, when all under heaven is His?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The wording of the verse before it — about soft words — is read as an attempt to talk the animal into surrender.

Could Job persuade him to respond softly to him in order to bring about his submission? (v.4). The very appearance of the crocodile is hostile and intimidating. He would certainly never be tamed to engage in play like some birds or animals, and certainly not as a pet for girls! (v.5).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God describes His works

These chapters are often quoted as nature writing. One writer says that is the opposite of their purpose.

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them, and what is man if he dares to judge such a God?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A power beyond man

Commentators differ over whether leviathan carries a meaning beyond the animal itself. Some stay with the creature and its Maker. Others read it as a picture of an enemy no man can bind.

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one he is — this king over all the children of pride! This world has rejected the King of Righteousness. It has preferred the horrible slavery of Satan. But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Him.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Another writer reads the water-creature as pointing forward to a future world power.

But let us remember it is God who made this beast: who then could possibly stand against God? This shows the fearful, untamable character of leviathan, as wild and unapproachable as behemoth, and it reminds us of the first beast of Revelation 13, the beast who rises out of the sea. … This Beast, along with the Antichrist, will form a powerful union of such strength that they will not be afraid to challenge their own Creator! While no man can stand before them, however, the Lord will bring them down to a crushing, humiliating defeat.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What it produced in Job

Job's own words at the end show what all these questions accomplished.

"I have heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you." It was nothing external now, no mere distant rumour. … Do you think that searching into the structure or habits of behemoth and leviathan would have led to anything of the sort? Certainly not. He had to do with God Himself, who used them for this very purpose, and had by them turned Job away from everything to Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Untamable. Writers identify leviathan with the crocodile: a strong, untamable beast — no hook, no reed, no bargain.

- No covenant. A covenant needs two parties who can hold each other to terms. Job cannot even catch this creature, let alone keep him for life.

- The Maker. If one creature is this mighty, what must the One be who called it into existence?

- Beyond man. Some read leviathan as a picture of an enemy stronger than any man: Satan, or a world power bold enough to challenge its Creator.

- The point. God shows His works to turn us from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. Job ended up occupied with God, not with the beast.

Job 41:5 · Darby

Wilt thou play with him as with a bird, and wilt thou bind him for thy maidens?

God has been questioning Job about a creature no man can catch or tame. Now He asks something stranger still: could Job keep this monster on a string, a pet for the girls?

The plain sense of the question

The picture behind the verse is a household pet — a small bird tied by a thread, handled by girls. Commentators place the crocodile beside that picture.

The very appearance of the crocodile is hostile and intimidating. He would certainly never be tamed to engage in play like some birds or animals, and certainly not as a pet for girls!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The verse sits inside a chain of refusals. God names every use a man might have for a creature, then rules each one out.

But if he is caught, is he soft and yielding, ready to give lifelong service? Or can you play with him like a bird or a deer, as a plaything for girls? No — he is no commodity for traders, no game for the hunter, no safe opponent in battle. The very sight of him could knock a man flat, and anyone who would provoke him is a fool.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The edge of God's questioning

God is speaking to a man who had been ready to judge His ways. The questions carry a sting.

"Can you draw out leviathan with a hook?" You who can do such wonders! You can talk about God. You can judge on God's behalf, and you can find fault with God! Well, can you catch leviathan with a hook? You ought to be able to do that. "Or press down his tongue with a cord?" Off with you! Don't you fight him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From the creature to the Creator

If a man cannot leash an animal, what is he doing squaring up to the One who made it?

If this is true of a mere creature, who can stand before the Creator? (That is how verse 10 should be translated. It leads into verse 11: "Who will stand before Me?") Who has first given to the Lord, so that he can demand it back again?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Kelly draws the same conclusion from both creatures — behemoth, the great beast of the chapter before, and leviathan here.

Nothing could be more vivid than these two accounts, or more forceful than the conclusion for Job and anyone else. These are mere animals, made by God's creative will. If their might is so great, how foolish it is to resist, criticise, or even judge His ways!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The untamable will

The untamable creature has a human parallel. What no one can tame in the water, no one has tamed in the human heart.

This spirit is not only national. The same strong self-will, which puts up with no contradiction, shows itself in individuals too — an untamable refusal to submit to authority. Who has ever bound and held the proud will of man?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Grant turns the creature into a question Job must answer about himself.

So he is untamable and uncontrollable. Man could do nothing with him as he does with an ox or a horse. He was also completely selfish: he was of no use to any man or animal. Would Job want to be like this — strong and self-confident, with no real aim of being a help to others?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What leviathan pictures

Commentators differ on what the creature stands for beyond itself. Some see the power of Satan behind it. Others see the same proud will at work in nations and in single people. Both readings land in the same place: Job needs to depend on God, not on himself.

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one this king over all the children of pride is... But what could God's aim be in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do everything."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Untamable. No hook, no rope, no leash — you can tie a bird for a child's amusement, but never leviathan.

- Unusable. The chapter dismisses every human use in turn: no servant, no trade goods, no game, no safe opponent.

- Unanswerable. If a made thing defeats you, the Maker is beyond argument — "who can stand before the Creator?"

- Unbridled. The same wild self-will lives in a man's heart; no one has ever leashed human pride.

- Undone. Job's only way out is not mastery but dependence: "I know that You can do everything."

Job 41:6 · Darby

Shall partners make traffic of him, will they divide him among merchants?

God's questions to Job about leviathan fill a whole chapter, and verse 6 uses market language: could traders bargain over him and sell him off in pieces? The question sounds almost comic, and that is the point — but commentators also ask what larger power the creature stands for.

The creature no market can handle

The verse sits in a chain of questions. Each one tests a different way to master an animal, and the market question is one more failed method:

Can you catch him with a net or a hook, or with a line pressing down on his tongue? Can you tie him up like an ordinary fish, with a rope of reeds through his gills? Is he timid and eager to please, or loyal and obedient? Can you make him a plaything, like a bird, to amuse the household? Is he a regular item in the markets, bought and sold? If he cannot be caught like a fish, can you attack him with darts and weapons?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The mockery is deliberate. Another writer runs through the same failures and ends with the man who tries anyway:

If secured, is he soft and yielding, ready to do perpetual service? Or can you play with him as you would with a bird or a deer, a toy for girls? No — he is no commodity for traders, no game for the hunter, no safe opponent in a fight. The very sight of him might knock you flat, and the man who would provoke him is a fool.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Merchants and a meal

The word for "merchants" here is the same Hebrew word used in other trade verses:

The same Hebrew word is translated "merchant" in Job 41:6, Proverbs 31:24 and Isaiah 23:8. So Zechariah 14:21 may mean, "there shall no more be the merchant in the house of the LORD of hosts."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Traders buy meat in order to sell it. One writer asks the obvious follow-up question:

Who would think of trying to get his flesh and make a dinner of him? Harpoons were useless against him, because they could not pierce his outer covering.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

From the creature to the Creator

The chain of questions has an aim. It moves from the creature to its Maker, and then to what any man could claim from Him:

If this is so with a mere creature, who can stand before the Creator? Who has first given to the LORD, that he can demand it back again? Or, as the apostle asks, "Who has given a gift to Him that he might be repaid?" (Romans 11:35).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how far the picture reaches. Some stay at the level of nature and set the creature beside man himself:

They had brute strength but no human intelligence. It would be easier to subdue them than to bring down proud man. In Job's day human inventions had hardly begun. So this was probably not as clear then as it is now, when we subdue these mighty creatures with ease — but not proud man!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A power for evil, and God's aim in showing it

Others read a further layer, linking leviathan to the dragon and to the world-power:

The description is not only of a mighty power, but of a power for evil. So Satan is called the dragon (Revelation 20:2). He rules the earth through his instrument, the ruler of Egypt, and of him it is said, "In that day the LORD with His hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and He will slay the dragon that is in the sea" (Isaiah 27:1).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

If that reading is right, the chapter has a purpose beyond natural history. God shows Job a strength far greater than his own, and the effect on Job is the point:

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one this king over all the children of pride is. But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into entire dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Untamable. Hook, rope, pet, dinner, harpoon — the questions change, the answer never does. It is always no.

- Unsellable. No trader can price him, cut him into portions or carry him to market.

- Unassailable. The sight of him alone can knock a man flat, and only a fool provokes him.

- Unanswerable. The argument climbs from creature to Creator: if a made thing defeats you, who can stand before the One who made it?

- Undone. Some see Satan and the world-power in leviathan; others see only brute strength. The aim is the same — Job's pride gives way to dependence on God.

Job 41:7 · Darby

Wilt thou fill his skin with darts, and his head with fish-spears?

God's questions to Job move from the land to the water. Here they settle on one creature that no weapon can touch. Verse 7 asks if Job can drive harpoons into its hide. Behind that question stands a bigger one: who can master anything in God's world?

The creature and the weapons

Commentators identify leviathan with the crocodile. Verse 7 names the gear a hunter would reach for, and rules it out.

Leviathan was a water creature. He appears to be the crocodile, the most fearsome of all water animals, unless he was another animal like it that is now extinct... Harpoons were useless against him, because they could not get through his outer covering (v.7). If anyone was bold enough to lay a hand on him, let him remember the fight that came of any such attempt, and never do it again! (v.8).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A harpoon was made to hold fast once it struck.

Irons shaped like a harpoon, which go into the flesh easily but cannot be pulled out again. God, to show His wisdom and power to Job, speaks of the leviathan, or crocodile, which barbed irons cannot enter. Job 41:7.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A challenge aimed at Job's confidence

Job had talked about God's ways and found fault with them. So God asks him to handle one animal.

"Can you draw out Leviathan with a fishhook?" You who can do such wonders; you can talk about God; and you can judge for God, and you can find fault with God! Well, can you catch leviathan with a hook?... Do not fight him. "Behold, the hope of him is in vain." Spears or arrows are nothing to him. Even a musket ball cannot pierce the skin of a crocodile. "His scales are his pride." It is not only that he has enormous strength, and that no ordinary weapon can wound him; he is also so confident in it himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's purpose in the description

Chapters like this are often read as nature study. Kelly says that misses what God is doing.

People talk as if God's only purpose was to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings forward His works to turn us away from our thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A power that cannot be attacked

Several writers see more here than an animal.

In all this first part of the description, we see the fierce, unapproachable, untameable character of this creature. The clear conclusion is the one already pointed out: if the creature is so mighty, what must the Creator be? But, as I have said, we should expect something more here than a declaration of God's greatness and power. This is not only a mighty power; it is a power for evil. So Satan is spoken of as the dragon (Revelation 20:2)... "In that day the LORD with his hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea" (Isaiah 27:1).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Commentators differ on what leviathan pictures. Ridout points to Satan himself. Grant points to a world empire still to come.

Leviathan is a water creature. He plainly pictures the non-Jewish power that will rise during the Tribulation, a revival of the Roman Empire... Of him people will say, "Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?" (Revelation 13:4)... While no man can stand before them, however, the Lord will bring them down to a defeat of abject humiliation.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the lesson lands

If no weapon works, what is left for a believer to do?

Now what a relief this is. The believer looked at in himself has no power to overcome Satan. Man failed before him while he was still innocent. How much less can he stand now that he has fallen. It was independence of God that opened the door for Satan at first; and it is simple dependence on God alone that can shut it... It is very gracious of God to tell us how great the power of the enemy is. He does it so we may know that our only resource is a firm trust in Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Weapon — the harpoon was built to sink in and never come out; against this creature it does not even enter.

- Failure — God names every tool Job could reach for and rules each one out. Job's own strength comes up short.

- Redirection — God describes His works not to make us study them, but to turn us from ourselves to Himself.

- Enemy — writers see a power for evil here. Some read leviathan as Satan. Others read it as a coming world empire.

- Resource — God tells us how strong the enemy is as a kindness. It leaves dependence on Him as the one thing needed.

Job 41:8 · Darby

Lay thy hand upon him; remember the battle, -- do no more!

God ends His answer to Job with a long look at one creature. In verse 8 the description turns into a dare. God tells Job to lay a hand on leviathan — and warns him, in the same breath, that one round will cure him of ever trying again.

The Dare Is a Warning

The question is not an invitation but a dismissal. Job has talked about God and judged His ways, so God asks whether he can handle one animal.

"Can you draw out leviathan with a hook?" You who can do such wonders; you can talk about God, and you can judge for God, and you can find fault with God! Well, can you catch leviathan with a hook? You ought to be able to do that. "Or press down his tongue with a cord?" (vv. 1–8). Be off with you! Do not fight him. "Behold, the hope of him is in vain." Spears or arrows are nothing to him, and even a musket ball has no power to pierce the skin of a crocodile.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Every Method Already Tried

Verse 8 sits at the end of a list. Each earlier question rules out one way of handling him: fishing, taming, selling, spearing. Only bare hands are left. One memory of that battle then settles the matter for good.

Can he be captured with a net or hook, by a line pressing down on his tongue? Can he be bound like an ordinary fish with a rush rope passed through the gills? Is he timid and fawning, or loyal and obedient? Can he be made into a plaything, like a bird, for the amusement of the household? Is he a regular item in the markets, bought and sold? If he cannot be caught as a fish, can he be attacked with darts, with weapons? Whoever has tried this will surely remember the fearful battle, and will never try again. He is the despair of all opposition; none dare stir him up or stand before him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Force of the Words

A closer rendering shows how compressed the line is — three short blows, with the memory of the fight doing the arguing.

Do you fill his skin with pikes, or his head with fish-spears? Put your hand on him — remember the battle — you will not do it again: Behold, his hope proves false.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From the Creature to the Creator

The animal is never the point. The argument runs upward: if a made thing is beyond Job, what is the One who made it?

If such is the might of mere brutes, the effect of God's creative will, what folly to resist, censure, or even judge His ways!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Leviathan Pictures

Commentators differ here. Some read the chapter as a description of a crocodile. Others say it points to more than natural history.

In all this first part of the description we see how fierce, unapproachable and untamable this creature is. The obvious conclusion is the one already drawn: if the creature is so mighty, what must the Creator be? But, as already said, we should expect something more here than this declaration of God's greatness and power. This is not only a mighty power; it is a power for evil. So Scripture calls Satan the dragon (Rev. 20:2).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Ridout finds the same defiance in the great empires of history.

Man's rule, as opposed to God's — how common it has been! In Nebuchadnezzar we have this pride displayed at the very summit of Babylon's greatness. And ever since his day, how kings have dreamed of world-empire — Median, Grecian, Roman, and all the lesser Caesars since that day. How fierce and cruel they have been — how intractable, how untamable. Who could dispute with them at the height of their power — "remember the battle, do so no more."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why Knowing This Is Kindness

Learning that a fight is unwinnable sounds crushing. Taken the right way, it is the opposite.

Now what a relief this is. The believer, looked at in himself, has no power to overcome Satan. Man failed before him when innocent; much less, then, now that he is fallen, is he able to stand. It was independence of God that opened the door to Satan at first, and it is simple dependence on God alone that can shut it. May God give us a deep sense of dependence on Himself. It is very gracious of God to tell us what the power of the enemy is, so that we may know that our only resource is a firm trust in Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Dare — The invitation to lay a hand on leviathan is not encouragement but a warning: "Do not fight him."

- Defeat — Hook, rope, market, spear: God rules out every method first. Whoever tries the last one will "remember the fearful battle" and never try again.

- Deduction — If one creature of God's making is beyond Job, then to "resist, censure, or even judge His ways" is folly.

- Depth — Some read leviathan as the crocodile. Others see "a power for evil" behind it — the pride that rose in Nebuchadnezzar and in every empire since.

- Dependence — God tells us how strong the enemy is, and that comes as a relief. It drives us off self and onto Him, where "our only resource is a firm trust in Himself."

Job 41:9 · Darby

Lo, hope as to him is belied is not one cast down even at the sight of him?

God's final speech to Job ends with a long portrait of leviathan, a creature no man can capture or fight. Verse 9 draws the conclusion, and it is aimed at Job himself. Who is this creature, and why does God press it on a suffering man who has been demanding a hearing?

A creature that ends all opposition

The verse belongs to a run of taunting questions about catching, taming and fighting the beast. One commentator hears God telling Job to give up the fight before it starts. Ordinary weapons cannot even pierce the creature's skin:

"Can you draw out Leviathan with a fishhook?" You who can do such wonders; you can talk about God; and you can judge for God, and you can find fault with God! "Or press down his tongue with a cord?" (vv. 1-8). Be off with you! Do not fight him. "Behold, the hope of a man is false." Spears or arrows are nothing to him, and even a musket ball has no power to pierce the skin of a crocodile.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The hope that fails belongs to the attacker. The man who survives one fight with this creature never comes back for a second:

Anyone who has tried this will remember the terrible battle, and will never try again. He is the despair of all who oppose him. No one dares stir him up or stand before him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Which animal

One writer settles on the crocodile rather than the whale or dolphin. He draws his point straight from the creature's strength:

The leviathan described here seems beyond doubt to be the crocodile, not the dolphin or the whale, as some learned men have argued. Nothing could be more vivid than these descriptions, and nothing more forceful than the conclusion they press on Job and on everyone else. If mere animals are this mighty, and God made them by His will, what folly it is to resist His ways, or criticise them, or even judge them!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From the creature to the Creator

The description of the animal is only a step. The verses that follow turn the question to God Himself:

If this is true of a mere creature, who can stand before the Creator? (That is how we should translate verse 10, and it leads on to verse 11: "Who will stand before Me?") Who has first given to the Lord, so that he can demand it back again? Or, as the apostle asks, "Who has given a gift to Him that he might be repaid?" (Rom. 11:35).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A picture of the power of evil

Several writers see more here than a strong animal. The name reappears in the prophets for a hostile power that God alone can destroy:

The chapter describes not only a mighty power, but a power for evil. So Scripture calls Satan the dragon (Rev. 20:2). And as ruler of the earth, acting through his instrument the ruler of Egypt, he is the one spoken of here: "In that day the LORD with His hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and He will slay the dragon that is in the sea" (Isa. 27:1).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Commentators differ on where this points. Some see Satan himself. Others see a ruler still to come. Either way, the end is settled:

The Lord assures Job that any hope of overcoming Leviathan is futile: the very sight of the beast should overwhelm his would-be attacker. No human is so fierce that he would dare to stir up such a creature (v.10). But let us remember it is God who made this beast: who then could possibly stand against God? … This Beast, along with the Antichrist, will form a union so strong that they will not be afraid to challenge their own Creator! While no man can stand before them, however, the Lord will bring them down to a defeat of abject humiliation.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God shows Job an enemy he cannot beat

Read this way, the description does more than humble Job. It clears away a false hope so a true one can take its place:

The believer looked at in himself has no power to overcome Satan. Man failed before him while still innocent. Now that he has fallen, he is even less able to stand. It was independence of God that opened the door for Satan at first; and it is simple dependence on God alone that can shut it. It is very gracious of God to tell us how strong the enemy is. Then we know that our only resource is a firm trust in Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Vain hope. The hope that fails is the attacker's own. Hook, cord and weapon all fail, and one battle cures a man of trying again.

- Vain against a creature. Leviathan, most likely the crocodile, is only something God made. Resisting or judging its Maker is folly.

- Vain before the Creator. The argument climbs from the beast to verse 10: "Who will stand before Me?" No one has ever given God anything He must repay.

- Vain against the enemy. Read as a picture of the power of evil, leviathan is beyond any man's strength. Yet the Lord will bring it down.

- Hope that holds. Independence from God opened the door to the enemy. Only dependence on God shuts it. He shows us the enemy's power so that we will trust Him alone.

Job 41:10 · Darby

None is so bold as to stir him up; and who is he that will stand before me?

God's questions to Job end with a creature no one would dare to wake. The point is not the animal. It is the One who made it. If a man will not face leviathan, how could he face leviathan's Maker?

From the Creature to Its Maker

The chapter argues by comparison, from the hook and the reed up to the closing question:

Most identify leviathan with the crocodile. Like behemoth, leviathan is a strong and untamable beast. Jehovah asks: Can you draw out leviathan with a hook? Can you pierce his jaw with a reed? Will you take him for a servant forever? Then He declares that he is fierce, and even the sight of him casts a man down. And if a creature is so mighty and strong, what must the One be who called this creature into existence? Verses 10 and 11 should read: "Who then is able to stand before Me (the Creator)? Who gave to Me first, that I should repay him? Since all beneath the heavens is Mine."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Not Even Worth Trying

The chapter runs through every use a man might make of leviathan. Each one is absurd. And that is nothing next to the real subject.

Can you play with him like a bird or a deer, a toy for girls? He is no commodity for traders, no game for the hunter, no safe opponent in battle. The very sight of him might knock you flat, and the man who would provoke him is a fool. Yet what is that compared with making a stand before God?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No Claim on God

The second half of the verse turns from the beast to God. The next verse says why: no one has ever put God in their debt.

If this is true of a mere creature, who can stand before the Creator? (This is how verse 10 should read. It leads up to verse 11, "Who will stand before Me?") Who has ever given to Jehovah first, so that he can demand it back? Or, as the apostle asks, "Who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?" (Romans 11:35).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Strength That Pictures Something Worse

Commentators differ on what leviathan pictures. Some see a power for evil, and behind it Satan himself:

This describes not only a mighty power, but a power for evil. Scripture calls Satan the dragon (Revelation 20:2). As ruler of the earth, working through his instrument the ruler of Egypt, he is the one spoken of here: "In that day the LORD with his hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea" (Isaiah 27:1).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Others link the same creature to the beast of Revelation, whom no one will dare to fight:

No human is so fierce that he would dare to stir up such a creature (v.10). But let us remember it is God who made this beast. Who then could stand against God?… Of him people will say, "Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?" (Revelation 13:4). No man can stand before the beast and the Antichrist. Yet the Lord will bring them down to a humiliating defeat.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why Job Needed to Hear It

So why did God describe such an enemy to Job at all?

Under the figure of leviathan, God now shows Job that the power of Satan is too great for him. … But what could be God's purpose in describing the power of the enemy? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Him. "I know," says Job, "that you can do all things." … It was independence of God that opened the door to Satan at first, and simple dependence on God alone can shut it.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

What Finally Broke Him

God did not put these creatures before Job as a subject to study. He put them there to bow Job before Himself.

God brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He who made them, and what is man if he dares to judge such a God?… "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you." It was nothing external now, no distant rumour… "Therefore I despise myself." Do you think that studying the build or habits of behemoth and leviathan would have led to anything like that? Certainly not. He was dealing with God Himself. God used those creatures for that very purpose, and through them turned Job away from everything else to Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Stand: the creature. No one dares wake leviathan. No hook holds him, no trader wants him, no one tames him.

- Stand: the Creator. The verse turns on a comparison — if a made thing is beyond you, the One who made it is further beyond you still.

- Stand: no claim. Verse 10 leads into verse 11. No one can stand before God, and no one has ever given Him anything He must repay.

- Stand: the evil power. Commentators differ here. Some see Satan the dragon. Others see the coming beast people call unbeatable. Both say God will bring it down.

- Stand: Job's collapse. God's aim was dependence, not zoology. Job stopped defending himself when his eye saw God.

Job 41:11 · Darby

Who hath first given to me, that I should repay [him]? [Whatsoever is] under the whole heaven is mine.

God's speech from the whirlwind ends with leviathan, a creature no one can hook, tame, or fight. If no one dares face that beast, who can face its Maker — and what could anyone ever hand God that was not already His?

From the Creature to the Creator

The whole leviathan description builds to this verse. One writer reads verse 10 as the lead-in, so the challenge shifts from the animal to God Himself.

If this is true of a mere creature, who can stand before the Creator? (For this is how verse 10 should be rendered — "Who will stand before Me?" — leading up to verse 11.) Who has first given to Jehovah, that he can demand it back again? Or, as the apostle asks, "Who has first given to Him, and it shall be repaid to him again?" (Rom. 11:35).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer lists what nobody can do with this creature, then asks what facing God would be like.

He is no commodity for traders, no game for the hunter, no safe opponent for battle. The very sight of him might knock a man flat, and the man who provokes him is reckless. Yet what is that compared to making a stand before God? And who ever gave to Him that He should repay, since all under heaven is His?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Untamable Will

The creature no one can tame has a human counterpart. One writer traces the same refusal to be mastered in the will of man.

The principle — independence of God, seeking to make a name for itself — has been visible since the days of Cain, who built a city, and of Nimrod, who founded the first great world-empire (Gen. 10:8-10). This is not limited to national greatness. The same spirit of strong self-will, which puts up with no contradiction, shows up in the individual too — an untamable refusal to be under authority. Who has ever bound and held the proud will of man?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Nobody Gives to God First

The first half of the verse rules out a whole way of relating to God. Man keeps trying to reverse the roles, and Scripture keeps refusing.

Man would gladly make God a receiver instead of a giver. But this cannot be. "It is more blessed to give than to receive," and God must have the more blessed place. God can accept the smallest gift from a heart that has learned the deep truth in those words, "Of your own have we given you." But the moment a man dares to take the place of the first giver, God's reply is, "If I were hungry, I would not tell you." For "He is not served by human hands, as though He needed anything, since He gives to all life and breath and everything." Praise is all that we can offer to God. But we can only offer it when we know clearly that our sins are all put away, and that comes only through faith in the accomplished atonement.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Another writer turns the question on people who treat their own good works as a claim on God.

We have neither known His mind, nor had anything to do with His counsel. Still less have we given to Him first, so that He should be in debt to repay us. This has been Israel's folly, and the folly of many more. They would gladly make themselves creditors of God, as though their good works and assumed righteousness were a claim upon Him! Elihu rightly demanded of Job, "If you are righteous, what do you give Him? Or what does He receive from your hand?" (Job 35:7).

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Everything Under Heaven Is Mine

The second half of the verse gives the ground for the first: since all is His already, no gift of ours can be first. One writer notes how easily talk of rights leaves God out.

How seldom those who talk of rights seem to think that God has any! They are absorbed in themselves, in man; God is in none of their thoughts. Yet if any rights are to be respected at all, His must come first — the One whose sovereign will gave us being and everything else. If we think ourselves entitled to do what we like with what is ours, what shall we say of Him? We ourselves and all that we have belong to Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Conclusion Job Was Meant to Draw

All of this aimed at one man: Job, who had been judging God's ways.

If such is the strength of mere animals, made by God's creative will, what folly to resist, criticise, or even judge His ways!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Creature, then Creator. No one dares provoke leviathan. So no one can make a stand before the One who made him.

- Nothing given first. No one has ever put God under obligation. The same question turns up again in Romans 11:35.

- Because all is His. Since everything under heaven already belongs to God, no gift can be original — "of your own have we given you."

- The reversed roles. Man keeps trying to make God a receiver and himself a creditor, treating good works as a claim. But God gives to all life and breath and everything.

- The result in Job. If mere animals are beyond him, it is folly to resist, criticise, or judge God's ways.

Job 41:12 · Darby

I will not be silent as to his parts, the story of his power, and the beauty of his structure.

At verse 12 God promises to hold nothing back about leviathan — its limbs, its strength, its frame. Why spend so many words on a monster no one can catch, and what was Job meant to learn from it?

No Silence About the Enemy's Strength

God begins by refusing to stay quiet about the creature. That refusal says as much about God as about leviathan:

But the Lord says of Leviathan, "I will not keep silence concerning his limbs, or his mighty strength, or his goodly frame" (v.12). The Lord would not hesitate to describe him exactly as he is. He describes him so we would know that He knew him perfectly and took full account of his strength.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Where the Detailed Description Begins

This verse opens the door to the rest of the chapter, where even the creature's shields carry a kind of majesty:

Details are then given, from verse 12 to the end. … Then what majesty the curved shields have! They close as tight as a seal, so no breath can get in, and every part holds together and cannot be pulled apart.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer runs through the creature's parts and lands on its pride:

A more detailed description of the leviathan follows. His frame is strong; his outer garment is so invulnerable — who can strip it off? His teeth are terrible; who can open the doors of his face, that is, his mouth? His scales, his armour, are his pride.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

From the Creature to the Creator

God is not giving Job a nature lesson. The greatness of the work points to the greatness of the One who made it:

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our thoughts and bow us to Himself; for if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work, and what is man if he dares to judge such a God?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Yet greatness is not the whole lesson. The creature also stands for something evil:

In all this first part of the description, we have the fierce, unapproachable, untamable character of this creature. The conclusion is clear, as already shown: if the creature is so mighty, what must the Creator be? But, as we said, we should expect something more than this declaration of God's greatness and power. This is not only a mighty power; it is a power for evil.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Leviathan Stands For

Commentators differ on what leviathan pictures. One writer pairs leviathan with behemoth and reads both as figures of the same enemy:

Both beasts typify power and pride. So we must admit that Wordsworth's comment does not seem entirely far-fetched: "It seems probable that behemoth represents the Evil One acting in the animal and fleshly parts of man's own makeup. Leviathan symbolises the Evil One working as his enemy from outside. Behemoth is the enemy within us; leviathan is the enemy outside us."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer turns the creature's title on Job himself:

He is king over all the sons of pride. … And now the conclusion which Job could easily draw. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out its depths. He had cherished pride, the Devil's crime.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Result God Wants

Learning how strong his enemy is leaves Job one place to go:

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. … But what could God's object be in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Speaks — God refuses to keep silent about leviathan. He names the enemy's power out loud.

- Measures — God lists the limbs, the strength, the frame. He knows this creature perfectly and has taken full account of what it can do.

- Outmatches — If the creature is this mighty, what must the Creator be?

- Exposes — Leviathan's armour is his pride, and he is king over the sons of pride. A proud person belongs to that king.

- Bends — The whole description moves Job off himself and onto God, who can do all things.

Job 41:13 · Darby

Who can uncover the surface of his garment? who can come within his double jaws?

God speaks to Job out of the storm and points him to one creature: who could handle it? The questions about stripping its hide and bridling it are not lessons in zoology — they take aim at a man who had been arguing with God.

The creature in view

Commentators take leviathan to be the crocodile. They read the pictures in this verse as plain descriptions of its body. One writer ties each question to a part of the animal:

A more detailed description of the leviathan follows. His body is strong. His outer garment cannot be pierced — who can strip it off? His teeth are terrible — who can open the doors of his face (his mouth)? His scales, his armour, are his pride. This is a good description of the crocodile's hide.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Others have argued for the dolphin or the whale. One commentator notes that most settled on the crocodile once they studied the question closely, and that no description could be more vivid, or the lesson for Job more forceful.

William Kelly

Nothing hidden from God

Just before this verse, God says He will not hide the creature's limbs or strength. Holding nothing back is part of the argument:

The Lord would not hesitate to describe him exactly as he is. He wanted us to know that He knew this creature through and through, and took full account of his strength… Men have caught crocodiles and kept them in large pools of water. But who would dare get into the same pool, as some people do with dolphins?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Armour with no seam

The "outer garment" is the creature's hide, and no one can peel it off. One writer reads that seamless armour as a picture of something in the heart:

The scales on his head and body are an armour nothing can get through, and so is pride — each scale linked to the next, with no gap in the armour where an arrow could pierce.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The will that no one has ever bridled

A bridle goes on an animal someone has already tamed, and older translations read this second question as coming within the creature's double jaws. Either way, no one gets that close. The same writer takes the question past the riverbank, first to a nation and then to a single person:

The principle (independence from God), trying to make a name for itself, has been on show since the days of Cain, who built a city, and of Nimrod, who founded the first great world empire (Gen. 10:8-10). It is not limited to nations that want to be first. The same spirit of strong self-will, which allows no contradiction, shows up in the individual as well — a refusal to bow to authority that no one can tame. Who has ever tied down and held the proud will of man?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Commentators differ on what the creature stands for. Some read him as a picture of world power. Another sees in him the strength of the enemy:

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him… Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

The purpose behind the description

The danger is to stop at the animal and admire it. God's aim runs in the opposite direction:

People talk as if God's aim was just to keep us busy with His works. God does the opposite. He brings His works forward to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us before Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He who made them? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Kindness in the humbling

God's questions press hard on a broken man. One writer calls that pressure mercy:

Is it cruel of the Lord to treat a poor, broken-hearted man like this? Ask instead: would it have been kind to leave him wrapped in his pride like a garment, shouting against the Almighty? Pride can only be brought low one way — by standing face to face with its own nothingness before the majesty and boundless goodness of God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Garment — the "outer garment" is the crocodile's hide. No one can strip it off. The picture starts with a real animal, not a symbol.

- Bridle — you bridle an animal you have already tamed, and no one has tamed this one. Its scales are its pride, sealed so tight no arrow finds a gap.

- Will — the same untamed will runs through empires since Nimrod and through one stubborn heart. That is why the picture lands on Job.

- Purpose — God shows His works to turn us from our own thoughts and bow us before Himself. He is not making us students of wildlife.

- Kindness — leaving Job wrapped in his pride would not have been mercy. Pride only bows when it stands face to face with God.

Job 41:14 · Darby

Who can open the doors of his face? Round about his teeth is terror.

God's final questions to Job move from the whole creature to its head — and stop at the one place no one would ever put a hand. Why does God spend so many verses on a mouth, and what is a broken man meant to learn from it?

The words themselves

One writer works through the description and explains the phrase in the verse:

A more detailed description of the leviathan follows. His body is strong. His outer covering cannot be pierced — who can strip it off? His teeth are terrible. Who can open the doors of his face (his mouth)? His scales, his armour, are his pride.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another renders the Hebrew line by line, and the word order itself carries the menace — the jaws come first, and terror is what surrounds the teeth:

Who has uncovered the face of his garment? Into his double jaws who enters in? The doors of his face, who has opened? Round about his teeth is terror.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A question no one volunteers to answer

God does not ask whether anyone can catch the creature. He asks who would go near its face. Commentators identify leviathan with the crocodile:

Men have captured crocodiles and put them in large pools of water. But who would dare to get into the same pool, as some do with dolphins?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God describes His creatures at all

These chapters are often read as nature writing. One writer insists that misses the whole point of them:

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God? ... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Something more than a large animal

Commentators see more than an animal here. One gives the reason:

It is not only a mighty power that is described, but a power for evil. So Satan is spoken of as the dragon (Revelation 20:2). And as ruler of the earth, through his instrument the ruler of Egypt, it is said of him, "In that day the LORD with his hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea" (Isaiah 27:1).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The title at the close of the chapter then turns on Job himself:

Both the behemoth and the leviathan typify Satan, his character and his rule. He is king over all the sons of pride... And now the deduction which Job could easily make. If he is proud then he belongs to leviathan the king who rules over the sons of pride. The LORD has touched the secret in Job's heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The armour we wear ourselves

The armoured jaw that will not be opened has a counterpart nearer home. One writer turns the untameable creature into a mirror:

Applied to each person, this "crooked serpent" is a picture of the perverted will of man. All sin has its roots in disobedience. Men may smile at it, but what more terrible thing is there than this self-will — the carnal mind... What use is the effort to reform the world, to tame the crocodile? Men may dream and plan, and try to drive misery off the earth. But even while it groans, creation mocks at human efforts to subdue its own perverted will.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where the questions are driving

Why describe an enemy Job could never beat? One writer gives the purpose:

God now shows to Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him... But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary in this way? Surely it was to lead Job into entire dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that you can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

One sword that reaches

The chapter asks who can open those doors. One writer sets that question beside victories no human sword could win:

Could Joshua's or David's sword have won such victories as these? Would the principalities of darkness have yielded to them? Would death and hell have submitted themselves? "Can you draw out Leviathan with a fishhook?" But "He who made him can bring near His sword."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Terror. The doors of the face are the beast's mouth, ringed with teeth. No one would dare open it.

- Turn. The works are not the destination; God displays them to draw a man off his own reasoning and bow him before the Maker.

- Pride. Behind the crocodile stands a power for evil. The chapter calls him king over all the sons of pride — so every proud heart sits under his rule.

- Powerless. The untameable jaw pictures the self-will in man that no reform or effort can subdue.

- Dependence. Shown an enemy too strong for him, Job is left with only one refuge: the One who made leviathan can bring His sword near.

Job 41:15 · Darby

The rows of his shields are a pride, shut up together [as with] a close seal.

God is still speaking out of the storm, describing leviathan — a creature no man can catch or tame. Here He points to its back, and the question is why such armour should matter to a suffering man.

The armour described

One writer reads the verse first of all as a description of a real animal:

His frame is strong. His outer garment cannot be pierced — who can strip it off? His scales, his armour, are his pride. Here is a good description of the crocodile's hide. The scales are so close to each other that no air can come between them. They are joined one to another and stick together, so that they cannot be pulled apart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Older translations read the first line as "his scales are his pride." One writer points to what lies behind that pride:

"His scales are his pride." It is not only his enormous strength, and the fact that no ordinary weapon can pierce him. He is also so confident in that armour himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Shut up as with a seal

The Bible uses a seal in more than one sense. One of them shapes the picture in this verse:

A second idea connected with it is the closing up for safety of something important and vital... Job 41:15-17 gives a remarkable illustration: the scales of "leviathan" are like a close seal, and not even air can get through them.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

Pride as a coat of armour

The scales do more than describe a body. One writer sees in them the way pride guards a person:

The scales on his head and body are, like pride, an armour nothing can get through — each scale linked to the next, with no gap in the armour where an arrow could pierce.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

If the creature cannot be tamed, neither can the thing it pictures in man:

Coming to how this applies to each person, we see in this "crooked serpent" a picture of the twisted will of man. All sin has its roots in disobedience. Men may smile at it, but what is more terrible than this self-will — the mind of the flesh... What use is the effort to reform the world, to tame the crocodile? Men may dream and plan, and try to drive misery off the earth. But even while it groans, creation mocks at human efforts to subdue its own twisted will.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Whom leviathan pictures

Commentators differ on what the creature stands for. Some see Satan behind leviathan and behemoth, the other great creature God has just described. They read the scales as a mirror held up to Job's own heart:

Both the behemoth and the leviathan picture Satan, his character and his rule. He is king over all the sons of pride... And now comes the conclusion Job could easily draw. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. God has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out its depths. Job has cherished pride, the Devil's own sin.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Others take it as a portrait of a coming world ruler who guards himself the same way:

These rows of scales are shut up tightly as with a seal, so that he is protected as by a coat of armour. The Roman Beast too will use every means of protecting himself against the attacks of any enemy.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God shows Job this

The chapter is not a nature lesson. Its aim is to move Job off his own ground:

Men talk as if God's aim was only to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think that after this Job was taken up with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God. That was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sealed — the rows of shields fit so tightly that not even air passes between them. A seal here means a closing up that nothing can enter.

- Proud — the same armour that keeps the creature safe makes it sure of itself. Strength it can trust in becomes pride.

- Impervious — pride works the same way in a person: linked scale to scale, with no gap where an arrow could reach.

- Untameable — writers differ on what leviathan pictures: Satan, or a coming world ruler. Either way, no human effort can tame it.

- Bowed — God does not show the creature for us to study. He shows it so Job stops judging Him and trusts Him instead.

Job 41:16 · Darby

One is so near to another that no air can come between them;

God answers Job with a whole chapter about one creature, and here He lingers on its skin: scale locked to scale, with no gap anywhere. Why would God settle a suffering man's questions by describing an animal's armour?

Armour Without a Gap

One writer sums up the chapter, moving from the sealed shields to the weapons that fail against them.

Then what majesty (or pride) in those curved shields! They close like a seal, so that breath cannot enter, and every part holds to the next so that nothing can pull them apart. ... No wonder the mightiest tremble when he rises. They miss their mark through fear. If one of them does reach him, the sword does not hold, nor spear, mace, nor lance, for he counts iron as straw and copper as rotten wood.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Scales as Pride

The tight fit is not only a fact about the animal. One writer reads that gap-free covering as a picture of pride.

The scales on his head and body are, like pride, an armour nothing can get through — each scale linked to the next, and no joint in the armour where an arrow could pierce.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What Lies Behind the Creature

Commentators agree the language fits a real animal, and they differ on what it stands for. One reads the verse as an exact account of a crocodile's hide, and reasons from the creature back to its Maker:

If a creature is so mighty and strong, what must the One be who called this creature into existence? ... Here is a good description of the crocodile's hide. The scales are so near each other that no air can come between them; they are joined one to another, they stick together, so that they cannot be pulled apart. ... The final statement about leviathan is that he is king over all the sons of pride.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another sees in the sealed plating a picture of the last world ruler, who will make himself untouchable:

So he is protected as if by a coat of armour. The Roman Beast too will use every means to protect himself against the attacks of any enemy.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God Described It

The chapter is not there to turn us into students of the animal.

Men talk as if God's object was only to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our thoughts and bow us to Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God? ... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer reaches the same point from Job's side. A power too great for Job drove him to lean on God.

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. ... But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

The Seal Turned the Other Way

The same picture works the other way round. One writer lists what sealing means in Scripture, and this verse gives him his sharpest example:

A second idea connected with sealing is the closing up for safety of something important and vital... Job 41:15-17 gives a remarkable illustration: there the scales of "leviathan" are like a close seal, so tight that not even air can pass through.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

One writer starts from the two marks of a fish that Israel was allowed to eat:

Long ago there were creatures the people of Israel were not allowed to eat, because they were unclean; others were clean. A clean fish was known by two marks: it had to have both fins and scales. The fins let it swim against the stream... There are times when a fish must swim through filthy water, and to protect it God has given it scales... Fitted with this armour, the fish can pass safely through the filth. So God has provided a way for His own to pass unharmed through all the filth around us, as well as the power to go against the stream.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Sealed shut. Scale locks to scale like a seal. Not even breath gets in — no seam, no gap, no place for a weapon.

- Sealed by pride. One writer reads that gap-free armour as a picture of pride: no joint anywhere for an arrow to pierce.

- Sealed enemy. Writers differ on what the creature pictures. Some see the power of Satan; another sees the last world ruler. Both read the armour as self-protection.

- Sealed lips. God's aim is not to make Job study the animal but to leave him with nothing to say against God. He brings forward His works to turn us from our own thoughts to Himself.

- Sealed safe. The same picture turns kind. A seal can also mean closing something precious up for safety. God gives His own an armour for the filth around them and power to swim against the stream.

Job 41:17 · Darby

They are joined each to its fellow; they stick together, and cannot be sundered.

Armour That Cannot Be Parted

The verse sits inside God's long description of leviathan, the creature Job could never catch or tame. One writer identifies the animal and explains why the detail about the scales matters so much:

Commentators have generally identified the leviathan with the crocodile. Like the behemoth, the leviathan is a strong and untameable beast... And if a creature is so mighty and strong, what must the One be who called this creature into existence? Verses 10 and 11 should read: "Who then is able to stand before Me (the Creator)? Who gave to Me first, that I should repay him? Since all beneath the heavens is Mine."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Seal Closed Tight

Verse 15 compares the rows of scales to a seal. One writer picks up that image to show what sealing means in Scripture:

One of the meanings of sealing in Scripture is the closing up for safety of something important and vital. Job 41:15-17 gives a remarkable illustration: it compares the scales of "leviathan" to a close seal and describes them as so tight that not even air can get through.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

Pride as the Covering

The chapter itself names what the scales stand for. In the older translation this writer uses, verse 15 reads, "His scales are his pride."

"His scales are his pride." It is not only his enormous strength, and the fact that no ordinary weapon can pierce him. He is also completely confident in that strength himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer goes over the creature piece by piece. He finds the same sealed hardness in every part:

The scales on his head and body are, like pride, an armour nothing can get through — each scale linked to the next, with no gap in the armour where an arrow could pierce... In most animals the flanks are a weak spot, since the ribs do not cover them; his flanks are solid and cannot be pierced. Within is a heart like stone, indifferent to all fear.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What the Creature Pictures

Commentators differ on how far the picture reaches. Some read the chapter as the portrait of a real animal. Others see a figure behind it, and point to the chapter's closing line, that leviathan is king over all the sons of pride:

In Isaiah 27:1 we read: "In that day the LORD ... will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and He will slay the dragon that is in the sea." Here leviathan stands for the power of darkness... And now the deduction which Job could easily make. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Others carry the picture forward to a coming world ruler, and read the sealed scales as his defences:

So he is protected as if by a coat of armour. The Roman Beast too will use every means to protect himself against the attacks of any enemy.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God Described It

The point of the whole speech was never the creatures themselves.

So God's purpose in describing them in such grand language is not at all to make us stop there, turning them into a study that fills our minds and holds our souls. His purpose is the opposite. He would turn us away from ourselves to trust in Himself. Do you think Job spent his time on behemoth or leviathan after this? Not at all — his thoughts were on God, and that was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer draws the same conclusion, and names the enemy he sees behind the picture:

God now shows to Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him... But what could be God's object in thus describing the power of the adversary? Surely it was to lead Job into entire dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sealed. The scales lock so tightly that not even air passes between them — a seal closed for safety, with no gap an arrow could find.

- Pride. The chapter calls that seamless armour the creature's pride: strength, safety from every weapon, and self-confidence in one covering.

- Stone. The same hardness runs inward — compact flanks, a heart like stone, indifferent to all fear. Pride armours the outside and deadens the inside.

- King. Commentators differ on the figure. Those who look past the crocodile see the power of darkness, or a coming world ruler, who shields himself the same way. The chapter calls him king over all the sons of pride, and Isaiah says the LORD's sword will slay him.

- Dependence. God showed Job an enemy he could not scratch. The aim was not to fascinate him with nature but to turn him from himself. Job ended by saying that God can do all things.

Job 41:18 · Darby

His sneezings flash light, and his eyes are like the eyelids of the morning.

God speaks last in the book of Job, and He answers a suffering man by describing His own creation. That answer ends with leviathan, and verse 18 puts one question to Job: if you cannot face this creature, how will you argue with the One who made it?

Where the verse stands

God does not take Job through all of nature. He shows him just enough.

In the last two chapters of Jehovah's answer (Job 40, Job 41), which I must cover very briefly, God surveys not the whole realm of nature, but quite enough — more than enough — to prove Job ignorant and unable to speak before God. Job needed to learn this, so that he would distrust himself and trust God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The description of leviathan falls into three parts. Verse 18 belongs to the middle one.

Most interpreters agree that the "leviathan" here is the crocodile of Egypt, and it is described in great detail… There seem to be three parts: (1) His fierceness that nothing can tame (verses 1-11). (2) An analysis of his various parts (verses 12-24). (3) His outstanding strength (verses 25-34).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The words of the verse

Older English Bibles print "neesings" here, which the reference works simply translate:

"Sneezings." Job 41:18.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The second half of the verse draws on something ancient readers would have recognised at once.

His scales, his armour, are his pride. This is a good description of the crocodile's hide. The scales sit so close together that no air can get between them. They are joined to one another and stick together, so that they cannot be pulled apart. His sneezings flash forth light, and his eyes are like the eyelids of the dawn. You can see a crocodile's eyes from quite a distance under water. So the Egyptians used the crocodile's eyes in their picture-writing as the sign for daybreak.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Every part carries the same message

The sneeze and the eyes are not stray details. They belong to a survey of the creature part by part.

Coming to the details, Jehovah shows that the beast is not only irresistible when you look at him as a whole. Each of his parts declares the same all-conquering power… The very sneezing of such a creature is like a flash of burning sulphur from hidden fires inside him (verses 18-21); his eyes flash out like rays of the rising sun.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The beast's own attitude belongs to the picture too.

"His scales are his pride." He has enormous strength, and no ordinary weapon can pierce him. More than that, he is sure of it himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A shadow of something worse

Commentators differ on how far the picture reaches. Some read leviathan simply as one of God's creatures. Others hear a warning in the flash of light about a ruler still to come.

Of course this is figurative language. It speaks of the vicious words that come out of the mouth of the Beast, as Revelation 13:5-6 tells us about him… But the appearance of light, as though the beast brought light and wisdom with him, is a false show. Leviathan pictures this man's boastful pride and his frightening threats.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

What Job was meant to conclude

The picture of the creature is an argument about the Creator.

Nothing could be more vivid than the account of each creature, and nothing could press the conclusion home more forcefully for Job, or for anyone else. If mere animals have such might, and they are only the result of God's creative will, how foolish it is to resist God's ways, to find fault with them, or even to judge them!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

And all of this was still about things we can see.

And, after all, what was God speaking about? Earthly things. Every one of these things belongs to the natural world, and has to do with what we can see, with what is visible and temporary… still, if that is true of earthly things, what about the heavenly things? What about the eternal things? There we depend on God completely.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Creature. Most interpreters take leviathan to be the crocodile of Egypt. In Egypt, crocodile eyes stood for the dawn.

- Detail. God goes over the beast part by part in verses 12-24. Scales, sneeze, eyes — each one declares the same unbeatable power.

- Pride. His armour is also his pride. No ordinary weapon can pierce him, and he is sure of it himself.

- Shadow. Some readers see in the flashing light a picture of a coming ruler, whose light and wisdom are only a false show.

- Surrender. If one animal leaves Job speechless, it is folly to judge the ways of the God who made it. In eternal things we depend on God completely.

Job 41:19 · Darby

Out of his mouth go forth flames; sparks of fire leap out

God's speech from the storm ends with a long portrait of leviathan, and verse 19 sits at its heart — a mouth that seems to throw out fire. The chapter is not really asking about an animal: if a creature is like this, what is the Creator like, and who is man to judge His ways?

Where the verse falls in the description

Verse 19 sits inside a run of images (verses 18-21) where God takes the creature apart limb by limb. One writer shows how each part says the same thing about its power.

Coming to details, Jehovah shows that the beast is not only irresistible as a whole; each of its parts declares the same all-conquering power. The Lord starts with its dreadful mouth, ringed with sharp, cruel teeth, and points out that everything about the beast has the same character. The very sneezing of such a creature is like sulphurous light from hidden fires within (verses 18-21); his eyes flash out like rays of the rising sun.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The creature itself

Most writers here identify leviathan with the crocodile. One draws out the lesson the whole description is meant to teach.

Again, the leviathan described here (Job 41) seems to be beyond doubt, not the dolphin or the whale, as some learned men have argued, but the crocodile. Nothing could be more vivid than these descriptions, and nothing more forceful than the lesson they press on Job or on anyone else. If mere animals have such might, and they exist only because God willed to create them, what folly it is to resist, criticise, or even judge His ways!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer asks it as a plain question: "if a creature is so mighty and strong, what must the One be who called this creature into existence?" (Arno Clemens Gaebelein).

Fire from the mouth

One writer takes the flaming torches of verse 19 as a picture of words — the words of the Beast, a man described in Revelation — and says the light he seems to bring is not real.

Of course this is figurative language, and speaks of the vicious words that come out of the mouth of the Beast, as Revelation 13:5-6 tells us about him. But the appearance of light, as though the beast brought light and wisdom with him, is a false show. Leviathan's character gives a vivid picture of this man's boastful pride and his frightening threats.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A power for evil

Commentators differ on how far the picture reaches. Some keep to the animals themselves. Leviathan and behemoth "had brute strength but no human intelligence", and "it would be easier to subdue them than to bring down proud man" (F. B. Hole). Others see something darker behind the description, and point to another place where the same name appears.

This is not only a mighty power; it is a power for evil. So Satan is called the dragon (Revelation 20:2). And as ruler of the earth, working through his instrument the ruler of Egypt, he is the one described here: "In that day the LORD with his hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and he will slay the dragon that is in the sea" (Isaiah 27:1). How remarkable that the world-ruler should be spoken of in this way.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Read that way, each creature stands for a different enemy: "Behemoth is the enemy within us; leviathan is the enemy outside us" (Samuel Ridout).

God's purpose in the picture

God had a reason for showing Job a power he could never handle.

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one he is, this king over all the children of pride! This world has rejected the King of Righteousness and chosen the horrible slavery of Satan instead. But why would God describe the enemy's power like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that you can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

One writer sees design in the choice of these two creatures.

There was clearly divine design in the detailed description of the hippopotamus on one side, and in the still more detailed picture of the crocodile on the other. To an upright mind like Job's, they were fitted to overwhelm him with one thought. He who could do everything stooped to make man the object of His ways on earth. He ordered all things to bring man's heart into submission to Himself... So Job should be ashamed of his self-sufficiency.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Creature — Most writers take leviathan as the crocodile. The flaming mouth is one detail in a limb-by-limb portrait of a beast no weapon can open.

- Creator — The argument runs upward. If the creature is this mighty, what must its Maker be? To judge His ways is folly.

- Counterfeit — The fire looks like light, but it is a false show. The mouth stands for vicious, boastful, threatening words.

- Contest — Commentators differ. Some stay with the animal. Others see a power for evil behind it: the dragon of Isaiah 27:1 and Revelation 20:2, an enemy outside Job that he cannot fight.

- Conclusion — God shows Job a power too great for him. The aim is to shame his self-sufficiency and lead him into full dependence on the God who can do all things.

Job 41:20 · Darby

Out of his nostrils goeth smoke, as out of a boiling pot and cauldron.

Job 41 closes God's answer to Job, and the whole chapter describes one creature: leviathan. The smoke from its nostrils is a small part of a portrait built to raise one question — what did God want Job to learn?

The picture in the words

The verse sits in a run of lines about the creature's head — its sneezing, eyes, mouth and nostrils. Where the ESV reads "a boiling pot and burning rushes," the older translation these writers used has "a cauldron":

What light in his sneezing! Eyes and mouth give off brightness, or sparks of fire, and smoke out of his nostrils as from a cauldron.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Naming the creature

Most commentators settle on the crocodile, though not all with the same confidence. One writer names it and then draws out what it means for Job:

The leviathan described here seems beyond doubt to be the crocodile, not the dolphin or the whale, as some learned men have argued… Nothing could be more graphic than these descriptions. Nothing could be more forceful than the conclusion for Job, or for anyone else. Mere animals have such might, and they are the effect of God's creative will. What folly, then, to resist, criticise, or even judge His ways!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another leaves room for doubt, calling leviathan "the most fearsome of all water beasts, unless it was another similar animal, now extinct."

Leslie M. Grant

Why God describes it at all

The chapter is not a nature lesson. God aimed the description at the man listening. A reader can admire the writing and still miss the point:

Men talk as if God's object was simply to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them? And what is man if he dares to judge such a God?… Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God. This was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Smoke and fire as a figure

Several writers see more than an animal here. They read the fire and smoke as a picture of a coming world ruler. One traces that fire through each part of the creature's head:

The very sneezing of such a creature is like sulphurous light from hidden fires within (vv. 18-21). His eyes flash out like rays of the rising sun. Like the horses of the sixth trumpet, his mouth belches out "fire and smoke and sulfur" (Revelation 9:17). His neck is strength itself. It makes despair, not joy, dance before him — he is the herald of misery.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another reads the same lines as speech, not breath:

Of course this is figurative language. It speaks of the vicious words that come out of the mouth of the Beast, as we are told of him in Revelation 13:5-6… But the appearance of light, as though the beast brought light and wisdom with him, is a false show. Leviathan's character is a striking picture of this man's boastful pride and his ominous threats.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Some point to Satan himself, others to a human ruler.

King over the sons of pride

The chapter ends by calling leviathan king over all the sons of pride. That title turns the whole description back on Job:

Both the behemoth and the leviathan represent Satan, his character and his rule. He is king over all the sons of pride… And now the conclusion which Job could easily draw. If he is proud then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out its depths. Pride, the Devil's sin, has been cherished by him.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer asks why God would show Job such power at all:

What could God's purpose be in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that you can do all things."… Looked at in himself, the believer has no power to overcome Satan. Independence of God opened the door to Satan at first. Simple dependence on God alone can shut it.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Smoke. Fire, light and smoke pour from leviathan's eyes, mouth and nostrils, as from a boiling pot — a head no one dares face.

- Creature. Most writers identify leviathan as the crocodile. One allows it may be a similar animal, now extinct.

- Figure. Writers read the flame and smoke as the blasphemous words and threats of a coming ruler. His show of light is counterfeit.

- Pride. Leviathan is king over the sons of pride — the title that exposed the pride hidden in Job's own heart.

- Purpose. God shows a power Job cannot touch. Job stops studying the creature and starts depending on the Creator.

Job 41:21 · Darby

His breath kindleth coals, and a flame goeth out of his mouth.

God is speaking to Job, and He ends with a long description of a creature no man can catch. The picture peaks here: breath that sets coals alight, and flame shooting out of an open mouth. The point is not the animal. If a creature is this far beyond Job, what is the God who made it?

The Picture Itself

This verse sits inside a run of images that moves from sneezing to smoke to fire. One writer walks through the creature from head to heart:

What light flashes when he sneezes! His eyes and mouth give off brightness, or sparks of fire, and smoke pours from his nostrils as from a boiling pot. Strength lives in his neck, and dread marks everything in front of him. The rest of him is firm and cannot be moved, his heart as solid as stone, as hard as the lower millstone. No wonder the strongest men tremble when he rises up. If one of them does reach him, the sword does not hold, nor spear, club, or lance; for he counts iron as straw and copper as rotten wood.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer names the animal behind the description:

Now, in Job 41, comes a still longer description of "leviathan," and I understand that to be the crocodile. The crocodile is a very dangerous beast. It is not shy of people; on the contrary, it preys on men, women, and children, if it can get hold of them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fire as Speech

Another writer reads the flame as picture language, and links the open mouth with the words that come out of it:

Of course this is figurative language. It speaks of the vicious words that come out of the mouth of the Beast. Revelation 13:5-6 tells us of him: "The beast was given a mouth uttering haughty and blasphemous words… It opened its mouth to utter blasphemies against God, blaspheming His name and His dwelling, that is, those who dwell in heaven." But the appearance of light, as though the beast brought light and wisdom with him, is a false show.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A Figure of the Enemy

One writer compares leviathan with behemoth, the beast described just before him, and sees both as pictures of something bigger:

Some have thought this creature must picture Satan, as the chief of God's creatures (Ezek. 28), standing out in strength and pride. The same would be true of leviathan, in the next chapter. Both beasts picture power and pride. So it does not seem far-fetched to say with Wordsworth, "It seems probable that behemoth stands for the Evil One at work in the animal and fleshly parts of man's own make-up, and that leviathan pictures the Evil One at work as man's enemy from outside. Behemoth is the enemy within us; leviathan is the enemy outside us." But we may think of these creatures as pictures of evil men driven and controlled by Satan, rather than Satan himself.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Sting for Job

The chapter calls this creature king over all the sons of pride, and that title lands on Job:

If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret Job kept hidden inside. He has searched out the depths of his heart. Job has cherished pride, the Devil's own crime.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same root runs through every reader, not only Job:

Turning to what this means for each of us, we see in this "crooked serpent" a picture of the twisted will of man. All sin has its roots in disobedience. People may smile at it, but what is more terrible than this self-will — the mind set on the flesh? The mind of the flesh "is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot" (Rom. 8:7). What use is the effort to reform the world, to tame the crocodile?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Describes It

Some read these chapters as nature writing and stop there. That misses the point:

Men talk as if God's aim was only to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them, and what is man if he dares to judge such a God?… Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Fire — breath that lights coals tops a picture of eyes, mouth and nostrils pouring out light, smoke and sparks. Under it all sits a heart as hard as a millstone.

- False light — one writer reads the flame as speech: boastful, blasphemous words dressed up to look like wisdom. The brightness is only a show.

- Two enemies — these beasts picture power and pride twice over: the evil one at work inside man's own nature, and the evil one attacking him from outside.

- One king — leviathan rules as king over the sons of pride. Pride puts a man under that king, and Job had to face it.

- One aim — the whole description pulls Job off himself. He ends up occupied not with the monster, but with God.

Job 41:22 · Darby

In his neck lodgeth strength, and terror danceth before him.

Job 41 is God's long description of one creature, spoken to a man who had been questioning His ways. Verse 22 fixes on the neck, where the creature's strength sits, and on what runs ahead of it wherever it goes.

The creature in view

Commentators name the animal behind the picture, then draw a lesson from its sheer power.

The Leviathan described here seems beyond doubt to be the crocodile, not the dolphin or the whale, as some learned men have argued... Nothing could be more vivid than these accounts, and nothing more forcible than the conclusion for Job or anyone else. If such is the might of mere animals, the effect of God's creative will, what folly it is to resist, criticise, or even judge His ways!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Strength lodged in the neck

One writer pairs the strength with the dread, and adds what the rest of the body is like:

Strength lodges in his neck, and terror marks everything in front of him. The rest of him is firm and immovable, his heart solid as stone, hard as the lower millstone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer hears rebellion in that stiff neck. He works from an older translation that reads "sorrow dances before him" where the ESV has "terror":

"Strength dwells in his neck" (v.22), for his neck is stiffened in rebellion against God. "And sorrow dances before him" — as though sorrow was trying to dress itself in false joy, but it only brings misery and wretchedness.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Dismay that dances

The second half of the verse takes the language of dancing and fills it with the opposite of joy.

His neck is the embodiment of strength, causing despair, not joy, to dance before him — he is the herald of misery. Within is a heart like stone, indifferent to all fear.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The chapter's own verdict: pride

The chapter's closing line calls leviathan king over all the sons of pride. One writer traces that title past the animal itself:

In Isaiah 27:1 we read: "In that day the LORD with His hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent... and He will slay the dragon that is in the sea." Here leviathan typifies the power of darkness... And now the deduction which Job could easily make. If he is proud then he belongs to leviathan the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out the depths of it. Pride, the Devil's crime, had been cherished by him.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A portrait of a coming ruler

Commentators differ on how far to press the picture. Some read the stiff neck and the dancing misery as a ruler yet to come:

What an unbroken stiffness of neck! It makes everyone bend before it, and it fills the earth with ruin and men's hearts with grief. A riot of misery, a carnival of despair dances before him with glee — sword and plague and death, the unavoidable companions of absolute, Satanic power. The Beast will have no weak side, and he will know no pity. From his unyielding heart come hatred, scorn, death.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God describes it to Job

The description is not offered as nature study. One writer states what God is aiming at:

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them? And what is man if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer reads the same chapter as God showing Job an enemy he cannot handle:

God now shows to Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him... But what could be God's object in thus describing the power of the adversary? Surely it was to lead Job into entire dependence on Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Strength located. The verse puts the creature's force in its neck, and terror runs ahead of it.

- Strength stiffened. A neck that will not bend is rebellion made visible.

- Strength parodied. What dances ahead of him looks like joy and brings misery.

- Strength crowned. The chapter names him king over the sons of pride. Writers hear behind that the power of darkness, and a ruler yet to come.

- Strength answered. God shows Job a power he cannot master, so he will stop judging God's ways and depend entirely on the One who made it.

Job 41:23 · Darby

The flakes of his flesh are joined together they are fused upon him, they cannot be moved.

God is answering Job, and instead of arguing He describes a creature — leviathan, whose body has none of the soft places other animals have. Why answer a suffering man's complaint with a close look at a monster's hide?

Purpose of the Detail

Commentators note that the long, close description is deliberate. He is aiming at something in Job.

No one can doubt that there was divine design in the detailed description of the river-horse (or ox), and in the even finer details of the crocodile. To an upright mind like Job's, these details struck straight home. They were suited to overwhelm him with one thought. He who could do everything chose to make man the object of His ways on earth. He ordered all things to shape man's heart into submission to Himself. … Job therefore should be deeply ashamed of his self-sufficiency.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Meaning of the Words

The "folds of his flesh" are his flanks. Kelly names the creature as the crocodile, and Ridout walks through its body part by part.

Jehovah now comes to the details. The beast is irresistible as a whole, and each of its parts declares the same all-conquering power. … The scales on his head and body are an armour nothing can pierce, like pride — each scale linked to the next, with no gap where an arrow could get through. … His flanks are usually a weak spot in animals, since the ribs do not cover them. Here they are compact and impossible to pierce. Within is a heart like stone that knows no fear.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

So the verse is not about size. It says there is no place on him to strike.

A Power for Evil

Commentators differ on how far to press leviathan. Some keep to the creature itself. Others see a picture of an evil power behind it, and read verse 23 that way.

"The folds of his flesh" are so joined as to make him invulnerable to attack (v.23), and underneath his heart is as hard as a stone. What a picture of the great champion of unbelief! He will arise because the world has rejected the faithful, gracious Lord of glory, and he will think of himself as the saviour of the world.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Some who take this reading also draw a distinction between behemoth and leviathan:

It seems probable that behemoth represents the Evil One at work in the animal and fleshly parts of man's own nature. Leviathan then pictures the Evil One at work as man's enemy from outside. Behemoth is the enemy within us; leviathan is the enemy without us.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Pride Named

One title given to leviathan gathers up the whole portrait, including the unbreakable body of this verse.

He is king over all the sons of pride. … And now the deduction which Job could easily make. If he is proud then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out the depths of that heart. Job has cherished pride, the Devil's crime.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Same Hardness in Us

A body with no weak place and a heart like stone also describes a man who cannot be reached.

And will Job harbour in his heart even the seed of all this horror? Shall independence, self-will and pride find a home in him, and hatch out such offspring of hell? Such is self-will in its essence, and such is its full development. … Beneath the fair exterior of man such possibilities lie hidden. Even in a child of God there lurks a nature with these features.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where the Description Points

Some read the chapter as a nature study. Writers warn that this misses God's purpose in it.

God brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them? And what is man if he dares to judge such a God? … Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Design — The close detail is not decoration. It was suited to overwhelm Job with a God who can do everything, and to shame his self-sufficiency.

- Armour — The flanks are the soft spot on most animals. On leviathan they are compact and impossible to pierce, and inside is a heart like stone.

- Evil — Read as a picture, that unbroken armour shows a coming champion of unbelief whom no attack can touch. Commentators differ on how far to press it.

- Pride — Leviathan is king over the sons of pride. Job must draw the conclusion himself: if he is proud, this is his king.

- Heart — The point lands inside. The same self-will hides under a fair exterior, even in a believer. The cure is not to study the creature but to turn from ourselves to God.

Job 41:24 · Darby

His heart is firm as a stone, yea, firm as the nether [millstone].

God's last speech to Job describes leviathan piece by piece — teeth, scales, neck, folds of flesh. It ends inside the beast, at a heart harder than all that armour — and leaves Job to ask what he is meant to see there.

Armour all the way through

One writer walks through the armour piece by piece. The last piece is the heart.

The scales on his head and body are, like pride, an armour nothing can get through. Each scale is linked to the next, and there is no "joint of the harness" where an arrow could pierce... In most animals the flanks are a weak point, since the ribs do not cover them. His flanks are compact and impenetrable. Within is a heart like stone, indifferent to all fear.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

What creature is this?

Commentators differ on how far the picture reaches. Some read it as a real animal Job could have seen.

Now in Job 41 comes a still longer description of "leviathan," and I understand that to be the crocodile. The crocodile is a very formidable beast. It is not so shy of humans; on the contrary, it preys on men, women and children, if it can get hold of them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Others read the same details as a picture of a coming world ruler.

"The folds of his flesh" are so joined as to make him invulnerable to attack (v.23), and underneath his heart is as hard as a stone. What a picture of the great champion of unbelief! He will arise because the world has rejected the faithful, gracious Lord of glory — and this beast will think of himself as the saviour of the world!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

A heart that cannot pity

A heart of stone feels no fear. It also feels nothing for anyone else.

"The Beast" will have no weak "flanks" to be turned, as an army's flanks are turned. He will not know pity. From his stone-hard heart come hatred, scorn, death. Some have refused the tender pleading of the Heart of Love — of Him who said, "Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest." They will be crushed by the hard heart of the world-conqueror, who knows neither love nor pity.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The lower millstone and the conscience

The lower millstone is the fixed, unmoving stone at the base of a mill. One writer uses it for the conscience of Cain, who brought God his crops as an offering.

What would you think of a man hoping to get into heaven by offering his corn and his wine to God? He supposes, like Simon Magus in Acts 8, that the gift of God can be bought. It would show that his conscience was as hard as the lower millstone. He would be completely insensible to the condition he was in, and to the character of God. The very worship of Cain proved the desperate, utter insensibility of his heart to the judgment of God against sin...

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The same stone in Job

Job is not just a spectator here. The writer turns the picture on him.

And will Job keep in his own heart even the seed of all this horror? Shall independence, self-will and pride find a resting place in him, to hatch out such offspring of hell?... Beneath the fair exterior of man such possibilities lie hidden. Even in the child of God a nature lurks which has these features.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God shows Job a power he cannot beat

God has a purpose in showing him this. Job's own answer shows what it was.

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him... But what could be God's purpose in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that you can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

The one thing that softens stone

No argument can soften a heart of stone. It has to be replaced, and God does the replacing.

For this, the heart of stone must be taken out of the flesh, so that they may have a heart of flesh — a truly feeling and tender heart. To this is added the blessed assurance: "I will put my Spirit within you."

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Stone outside. Every part of leviathan resists attack; the scales are an armour with no gap where a weapon could enter.

- Stone inside. The heart is the last place searched and the hardest of all — a heart indifferent to fear.

- Stone enthroned. Some read the beast as a picture of the coming world ruler. From his stone heart come hatred, scorn and death.

- Stone in you. The seeds of the same self-will and pride lie hidden under a respectable exterior, even in a believer.

- Stone removed. Job's lesson is complete dependence on God. Only God takes out the heart of stone and gives a tender heart in its place.

Job 41:25 · Darby

When he raiseth himself up, the mighty are afraid they are beside themselves with consternation.

God's answer to Job out of the whirlwind ends with one creature: leviathan, described piece by piece until no one could picture facing it. The point is personal: if Job cannot stand before a thing God made, why was he arguing with God?

What the verse describes

The line sits inside a run of verses about weapons that fail. One writer renders it literally and shows how the fear works. It does not just frighten men; it spoils their aim:

Going back in part to the style of the first section, Jehovah dwells on how this beast cannot be wounded. Strong men are afraid of him. Terror and wounds make their hand tremble, so it misses its aim (verse 25, literally). Even if a sword should touch him, it fails to wound. No weapon can reach a vital spot, thrown from a distance or used close at hand. Iron is trampled down as straw, brass as rotten wood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The ESV puts the second half of the verse differently: at the crashing they are beside themselves. Either way, the bravest men lose control.

The argument from creature to Creator

The size of the creature is only a measuring stick:

Like the behemoth, the leviathan is a strong and untamable beast... Then He declares that he is fierce, and even at the sight of him one is cast down. And if a creature is so mighty and strong, what must the One be who called this creature into existence? Verses 10 and 11 should be read: "Who then is he who can stand before Me (the Creator)? Who has first given to Me, that I should repay him? Whatever is under the whole heaven is Mine."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why God spends two chapters on animals

It would be easy to read these chapters as a celebration of nature. One writer says that misses the point. The works are a doorway, not a destination:

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

More than an animal

Commentators differ on what leviathan pictures. Some read him as a picture of Satan, and find there the reason for the whole speech:

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one this king over all the sons of pride is... But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Others see a human ruler still to come. They read this verse as the moment he asserts himself:

The mighty men of earth will be afraid when this man asserts himself (v.25). Neither the sword, spear, dart nor javelin can penetrate Leviathan's armour (v.26), and all men's efforts to defeat the Beast will be to no avail.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Yet the same writer adds that this apparent invincibility has a limit: "While no man can stand before them, however, the Lord will bring them down to a defeat of abject humiliation."

The sting for Job — and for us

The chapter ends by calling leviathan king over the sons of pride. That title is the hook — the creature was never the real subject:

Now for the conclusion Job could easily draw: if he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out the depths of it. He had cherished pride, the Devil's crime.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Ridout presses the same question at the reader: "Beneath the fair exterior of man such possibilities lie hidden. Even in the child of God a nature lurks which has these features."

Summary

- Terror — When leviathan rears up, the bravest men shake and their aim fails. No sword, spear or arrow finds a vital spot.

- Creator — The terror is an argument, not a nature study: if the creature is this great, what must the One who made him be?

- Purpose — God is not calling Job to admire an animal. He is calling him to stop judging God and start depending on Him.

- Enemy — Commentators differ. Some see Satan's power, too great for Job. Others see a coming world ruler whom no weapon can defeat — until God brings him down.

- Pride — The last title, king over all the sons of pride, turns the light inward. The same self-will lies in every heart, including Job's.

Job 41:26 · Darby

If any reach him with a sword, it cannot hold; neither spear, nor dart, nor harpoon.

God's final speech to Job ends with a long portrait of leviathan. Here He names the weapons a man would bring against it, and dismisses them all at once. Two questions follow. Why does God spend so long on a creature's armour, and what should Job do with the answer?

The Purpose of the Description

The temptation is to read these chapters as a study in wildlife. Commentators warn that this misses what God is doing:

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our thoughts and bow us to Himself; for if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made the work, and what is man if he dares to judge such a God? ... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Weapons Named

The list is not vague. Each term is a real piece of ancient equipment. One word used here is close to the word for a coat of mail:

Saul put a coat of mail, shiryon, on David (1 Samuel 17:5, 38). This word is translated "habergeon" in 2 Chronicles 26:14 and Nehemiah 4:16, which also means "coat of mail," and there is a similar word in Job 41:26. It was made of brass scales fastened together.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Weapons That Land and Fail

The point of the verse is not that the weapons miss, but that they land and still achieve nothing. One writer works through the lines around it:

Strong men are afraid of him; through terror and wounds their trembling hand misses its aim. Even if a sword should touch him, it fails to wound. No weapon, from far off or close at hand, can reach a vital spot. Iron is trampled down like straw, brass like rotten wood. The arrow cannot make him flee. The flying sling-stone is like harmless chaff, and he mocks darts and spears.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

From the Creature to the Creator

The harder question is not about leviathan but about the One who made him:

If this is so with a mere creature, who can stand before the Creator? (Verse 10 should be rendered that way, leading up to verse 11: "Who will stand before Me?") Who has first given to Jehovah, that he can demand it back again?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A Picture of Something Larger

Many writers find more here than an animal. Some read leviathan as a figure of the coming Gentile world power of Revelation:

...this reminds us of the first beast of Revelation 13, the beast who rises out of the sea. Leviathan lives in water, so he clearly stands for the Gentile power that will rise during the Tribulation... Of him people will say, "Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?" ... While no man can stand before them, however, the Lord will bring them down to a defeat of abject humiliation.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ on the exact figure. Others read the two beasts of chapters 40 and 41 as two forms of one enemy:

So we have to admit that it does not seem far-fetched to agree with Wordsworth: "It seems likely that behemoth stands for the Evil One at work in the animal and fleshly side of man's own make-up. Leviathan stands for the Evil One working as his enemy from outside. Behemoth is the enemy within us; leviathan is the enemy without us."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

One Sword That Does Prevail

No human blade can hold. But one sword does reach him, and the point comes home to Job:

The final statement about leviathan is "he is king over all the sons of pride." That last word is significant, and it has a deeper meaning. In Isaiah 27:1 we read: "In that day the LORD with His hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and He will slay the dragon that is in the sea." Here leviathan represents the power of darkness... And now the conclusion Job could easily draw. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Where It Leaves Job

Job has seen a power he cannot touch. The result is not despair but reliance:

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him... But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sword named — The verse lists real weapons: sword, spear, dart and javelin. One of its words is close to the term for a coat of brass scales.

- Sword fails — The blade touches him and still cannot wound. Iron is straw, brass is rotten wood, arrows and sling-stones are mocked.

- Sword outmatched — No man can stand before this creature. So the real question behind the speech is God's own: "Who will stand before Me?"

- Sword mirrored — Writers see in leviathan the power of darkness and the beast of Revelation. The "king over all the sons of pride" exposes the pride hidden in Job himself.

- Sword surrendered — God's aim is not to make Job study the monster. It is to turn him from himself to complete dependence on the One who made it.

Job 41:27 · Darby

He esteemeth iron as straw, bronze as rotten wood.

God's answer from the whirlwind ends with a long portrait of leviathan, weighed here against the best weapons a man can forge. Why does God spend so many verses on one animal, and what is Job meant to conclude?

Weapons Turned to Rubbish

The verse belongs to a run of lines that dismisses, one by one, every tool an attacker might bring. One commentator gathers the whole sweep of failed weapons. He calls the second metal copper:

No wonder the mightiest tremble when he rises up, and miss their mark through fear. If one does overtake him, the sword does not hold, and neither does spear, mace, or lance. He counts iron as straw and copper as rotten wood, and he pays no heed to arrows, sling-stones, clubs, or javelins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer explains why. There is no soft place on him to aim at:

Even if a sword should touch him, it fails to wound — no weapon, whether from a distance or close at hand, can reach a vital spot. Iron is trampled down as straw, brass as rotten wood.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The Creature Behind the Picture

One writer takes leviathan to be the crocodile. His skin turns away far more than ancient weapons, and he knows it:

Spears or arrows are nothing to him, and even a musket ball has no power to pierce the skin of a crocodile. "His scales are his pride" — not only because of his enormous strength, and because no ordinary weapon can wound him, but because he is so confident in it himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The writer is quoting an older translation of verse 15 there.

Why God Describes It

It would be easy to read these chapters as a call to admire nature. One writer says that misses God's purpose in both leviathan and behemoth, the other great creature God describes here:

God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our thoughts and bow us before Himself. If God's works are so wonderful, who is He who made them? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God? … Do you think that after this Job's mind was on behemoth or leviathan? Not at all — it was on God. This was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Power for Evil

Beyond the natural picture, several writers find a further meaning. One of them points to where else the Bible uses this name:

This describes not only a mighty power, but a power for evil. So Scripture speaks of Satan as the dragon (Revelation 20:2). As ruler of the earth, working through his instrument the ruler of Egypt, Isaiah says of him, "In that day the Lord with His hard and great and strong sword will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent, and He will slay the dragon that is in the sea" (Isaiah 27:1).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That same reading turns the closing title of the chapter into a question aimed straight at Job's heart:

And now comes the conclusion Job could easily draw. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's bosom. He has searched out the depths of his heart. He has cherished pride, the Devil's crime.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same writer carries the picture forward to the world ruler of Revelation: "Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?" (Samuel Ridout).

What the Verse Leaves You

If iron is straw to this creature, then a man attacking him with his own resources has already lost. One writer draws out why God would tell us so:

The believer looked at in himself has no power to overcome Satan. Man failed before him even when he was innocent. Now that man is fallen, he is even less able to stand. Independence from God opened the door to Satan at first. Only simple dependence on God can shut it. … It is very gracious of God to tell us how strong the enemy is. Then we know that our only resource is a firm trust in Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Iron — the verse rates the hardest metal men can forge as straw. Sword, spear, arrow, sling-stone and club are all dismissed. No weapon reaches a vital spot.

- Armour — one writer reads the crocodile's scales as his pride. Nothing can wound him, so he fears nothing.

- Aim — God is not inviting Job to study wildlife. He holds up a creature so that Job stops weighing God and starts bowing to Him.

- Mirror — writers differ on how far to press this. Several see the "king over all the sons of pride" as a picture of the enemy, and as a probe into Job's own pride.

- Answer — if the enemy laughs at iron, self-confidence is useless. God tells us the strength of the foe so that our one resource becomes trust in Him.

Job 41:28 · Darby

The arrow will not make him flee; slingstones are turned with him into stubble.

God ends His answer to Job with a long picture of leviathan, a creature no man can catch, tame, or wound. Verse 28 is where human weapons give up: if Job cannot reach this animal with an arrow, how can he argue his case with the God who made it?

Weapons that fail

The verse sits in a run of lines where one weapon after another fails.

Here Jehovah dwells on how impossible this beast is to wound. Strong men are afraid of him; through terror and wounds their trembling hand misses its aim. Even if a sword should touch him, it fails to wound. No weapon can reach a vital spot, whether thrown from a distance or used close at hand. He tramples iron down like straw, bronze like rotten wood. The arrow cannot make him flee. The hurtling sling-stone is like harmless chaff. He mocks darts and spears.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The sling-stone is worth pausing on. A stone from a sling once brought down a giant; here it lands like chaff. Another writer lists the same failed arsenal and adds that the creature does not even bother to react.

No wonder the mightiest tremble when he rises up — that they miss their mark through fear — that, if one does reach him, the sword does not hold, nor spear, mace, nor lance; for he counts iron as straw, copper as rotten wood, and pays no attention to arrows, sling-stones, clubs, or javelins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God describes it at all

It would be easy to read these chapters as a nature documentary. That misses God's purpose.

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them? And what is man if he dares to judge such a God? ... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Job's measure taken

The argument runs from the smaller thing to the greater. Job had been pressing his case against God's dealings with him; God asks him to handle one animal first.

Job, however, could not tackle leviathan or behemoth, nor could he subdue proud man. How then could he contend with God? This was powerfully driven home into his heart.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The adversary behind the picture

Commentators differ over what leviathan stands for beyond the animal itself. One writer sees in leviathan an enemy Job could never have fought on his own.

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one he is — this king over all the sons of pride. This world has rejected the King of righteousness and preferred the horrible slavery of Satan. But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Him. "I know," says Job, "that you can do all things." ... It was independence of God that opened the door for Satan at first, and it is simple dependence on God alone that can shut it.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Others see the same armour on a coming world ruler.

This is God's own picture of the creature. Can we doubt that He would also draw from it the more dreadful description of "the Beast," and of the self-will that makes him what he is? "Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?" (Rev. 13:4). The deadly wound that has been healed is only a fresh declaration that he cannot be harmed. ... As the crocodile is king over all proud beasts, so this beast is king over all the sons of pride.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where invulnerability ends

An unwoundable enemy is only unwoundable by human weapons. The arrows and stones of verse 28 fail; something else does not.

When the Beast arises, the Antichrist will join him and set up an image to be worshipped in the temple area in Jerusalem, in honour of the Beast (Rev. 13:14-15). This will be the ultimate peak of man's pride, an arrogant challenge against God. Then the Lord Jesus will meet this challenge in awesome power. Both of these enemies of God will be "thrown alive into the lake of fire" (Rev. 19:19-20). Such will be the fearful end of him who "is king over all the sons of pride." What a lesson for us — to learn now to judge our own pride!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The same writer who sees a monster in the water also finds its seed in man.

And will Job keep in his heart even the seed of all this horror? Will independence, self-will and pride find a resting place in him, to hatch out such offspring of hell? ... Beneath the fine outward look of man such possibilities lie hidden. Even in the child of God a nature lurks that has these features.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Arrows — no weapon reaches a vital spot. The sling-stone lands on him like harmless chaff.

- Aim — God is not teaching natural history. He brings His works forward to turn us from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself.

- Argument — if Job cannot tackle one creature, he cannot contend with the God who made it.

- Adversary — writers differ on what leviathan pictures. Some see the power of Satan, too great for Job. Others see the coming Beast, whose deadly wound heals.

- Answer — human weapons fail, but the Lord Jesus meets this pride in power. So judge that pride in yourself now.

Job 41:29 · Darby

Clubs are counted as stubble; he laugheth at the shaking of a javelin.

God's questioning of Job ends with a long portrait of leviathan. Every human weapon bounces off this creature. Verse 29 is where the mockery peaks: clubs and javelins become a joke. Why does God describe a monster at such length to a man who is suffering?

Every Weapon Fails

One writer walks through the list, naming one weapon after another and dismissing each.

Strong men are afraid of him; through terror and wounds their trembling hand misses its aim. Even if a sword touches him, it fails to wound. No weapon can reach a vital spot, whether thrown from far off or used close at hand. He tramples iron down like straw, and brass like rotten wood. The arrow cannot make him flee. The flying sling-stone is like harmless chaff, and he mocks darts and spears.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer adds that the creature knows what it is wearing.

Spears or arrows are nothing to him, and even a musket ball has no power to pierce the skin of a crocodile. "His scales are his pride." That is not only because of his enormous strength, and because no ordinary weapon can really hurt him. He is also so confident in it himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Weapon Named Here

A Bible dictionary lists this verse under one weapon word, and gives the three things that word can mean.

Arrow, short spear, javelin. 2 Samuel 18:14; 2 Chronicles 32:5; Job 41:26, 29; Proverbs 7:23.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why God Paints the Picture

These chapters are often read as nature poetry. One commentator argues that this misses what God is doing with them.

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that made them, and what is man if he dares to judge such a God? … He would turn us away from ourselves to trust in Himself. … Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Enemy Behind the Image

Commentators read leviathan as more than an animal, and they differ over what he stands for. One writer sees Satan's power here, and asks why God would describe it to a suffering man at all.

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one this king over all the children of pride is. … But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into entire dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Others link the same armour to the beast of Revelation.

This is the divine picture of the creature. Can we doubt that He would also draw from it the more dreadful description of "the beast," and of the self-will that makes him what he is? "Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?" (Revelation 13:4). The healed "deadly wound" is just one more announcement that nothing can wound him.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Laughter, and the Sin It Exposes

The creature's laughter leads to the closing title of the chapter: king over the sons of pride. One writer shows how that title reached Job's own heart.

He is king over all the sons of pride. … And now comes the conclusion Job could easily draw. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out its depths. He has cherished pride, the devil's crime.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

One Sword Still Reaches

No club or javelin can touch this creature. One writer points to the one sword that can.

Is such a sword not alone in its glory? Could Joshua's or David's have won conquests like these? Would the principalities of darkness have yielded to them? Would death and hell have submitted themselves? "Can you draw out Leviathan with a fishhook?" But He who made him can bring His sword near to him.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

(That last line follows an older rendering of Job 40:19; the ESV reads, "let him who made him bring near his sword!")

Summary

- Pride armoured. Clubs and javelins are a joke to this creature. Its scales are its pride: strength and self-confidence in one.

- Pride personified. Commentators differ on the figure. Some read leviathan as Satan's power. Others read it as the coming beast, whose healed wound shows that nothing can touch him.

- Pride exposed. The title "king over the sons of pride" pointed at Job himself. If he is proud, he belongs to that king.

- Pride redirected. God does not display His works to make us students of nature. He displays them to turn us from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself.

- Pride broken. No human weapon reaches leviathan. Only the One who made him can bring His sword near. So the picture ends in dependence, not despair.

Job 41:30 · Darby

His under parts are sharp potsherds he spreadeth a threshing-sledge upon the mire.

In His final answer to Job, God describes one creature Job cannot touch. Verse 30 turns to the animal's belly — the place a hunter would look for a weak spot — and finds another layer of armour.

The Creature Described

What kind of creature is leviathan? One writer names the crocodile, but leaves room for an animal we no longer see:

Leviathan was a water creature. He appears to be the crocodile, the most fearsome of all water animals — unless it was another similar animal, now extinct.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Underside

Verse 30 sets two pictures side by side: broken pottery, and a sledge dragged over soft ground. One writer notes how few words the description needs:

No account could be shorter or more expressive than the one of his lower parts. The underside is like the sharpest broken pottery, as he rolls it like a sledge over the rivers.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No Vital Spot

The verses just before name one weapon after another and dismiss each one. Verse 30 finishes the list: there is nowhere left to strike.

Even if a sword should touch him, it fails to wound. No weapon, from a distance or close at hand, can reach a vital spot. He tramples iron down like straw, brass like rotten wood. The arrow cannot make him flee, and the flying sling-stone is like harmless chaff. He mocks darts and spears. His under parts, lying flat on the earth, are not weak, but like strong pieces of broken pottery.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Mire as Protection

One writer sees behind the crocodile a ruler with a kingdom of his own. On that reading the mud is not a weakness either:

This is God's picture of the creature. Can we doubt that He would also draw from it the more dreadful description of "the Beast," and of the self-will that makes him what he is? "Who is like the beast, and who can fight against it?" (Revelation 13:4)... The very "mire" of the people, for the time at least, protects him. The turmoil he creates in the earth, marking it with ruin, shows his pathway. He has no equal upon earth. As the crocodile is king over all proud beasts, so this beast is king over all the children of pride. Shall Job, shall we, do him reverence and help on his kingdom?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Another writer applies the same section of the chapter to human resistance against that power, and reads verse 30 as the last door closed:

Iron and bronze weapons, arrows, darts, slingstones and javelins are useless against him (vv.27-29). Underneath too he is equipped to resist attack (v.30).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Pride Exposed

Commentators differ on how far the picture reaches. Some stay with the animal. Others see Satan behind it, and read the description as a mirror held up to Job:

Here leviathan typifies the power of darkness. Both the behemoth and the leviathan typify Satan, his character and his rule. He is king over all the sons of pride... And here is the conclusion Job could easily draw. If he is proud then he belongs to leviathan the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out its depths. Job has cherished pride, the Devil's crime.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same writer turns the picture inward:

Coming to the individual application, we see in this "crooked serpent" a figure of the perverted will of man. All sin has its roots in disobedience... What good is the effort to reform the world, to tame the crocodile? Men may dream and plan, and try to drive misery off the earth. But creation, groaning as it is, mocks human efforts to subdue its own perverted will.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God Describes Him

Why give Job a whole chapter on an animal? One writer answers:

People talk as if God's aim was only to occupy us with His works. God does the opposite. He brings forward His works to turn us away from our own thoughts and bow us to Himself. If the works of God are so wonderful, who is the One who made them? And what is man, if he dares to judge such a God?... Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Armoured. The belly, where you would expect a soft spot, is like the sharpest broken pottery. The creature has no weak side.

- Unarmed. Sword, arrow, sling-stone and spear have already failed. Verse 30 shuts the last door on human attack.

- Protected. Even the mud he lies in works for him. One writer sees here the Beast, whom no one can fight against.

- Proud. Behind the animal stands pride — the Devil's crime, and the secret God uncovered in Job's own heart.

- Bowed. The point is not the creature but the Creator. Job ends up occupied with God, not with leviathan.

Job 41:31 · Darby

He maketh the deep to boil like a pot; he maketh the sea like a pot of ointment;

Job 41 closes God's long answer out of the storm, and the last picture He paints is a creature no man can handle. Why does God end His case against Job's complaints with a boiling sea?

The creature in view

Commentators read the description as that of a real animal. God pairs it with another beast, and sets both against man.

From verse 15 to the end of Job 41, the Lord makes further reference to the wonders of His creation. He called Job's attention to behemoth and to leviathan — probably the hippopotamus and the crocodile. They had brute strength but no human intelligence. It would be easier to subdue them than to bring down proud man.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The words themselves are vivid. One rendering has him spreading a threshing-roller on the mire, making the deep boil as a pot, and leaving a shining path behind him.

His under parts are the sharpest of shards; He spreads a threshing-roller on the mire, He makes the deep boil as a pot, He makes the sea like a pot of ointment.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Water stirred into turmoil

Several writers take the churned water as a picture of nations thrown into confusion by a coming world ruler.

As Leviathan stirs up the water, so the Roman Beast will stir up the nations (the sea) in tumultuous trouble. The "shining wake" he leaves behind him tells us that there will be marked results from the Beast's activity.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Commentators differ here. Another writer holds that God is displaying His own greatness through the created world, and that this alone answers Job:

I have already said that nothing the Lord says there lies outside the life of men and animals and the creation as we know it. Some see a hidden picture in these creatures, but I do not believe there is the slightest justification for this... He was displaying the immense greatness of God. If one of God's creatures terrifies the man who looks at him, how wrong it was of Job to keep on questioning God.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Power turned to evil

Writers who read the chapter as a picture point to Isaiah, where the same name belongs to a power God Himself will judge.

Isaiah 27:1 says that in that day the LORD will punish leviathan the piercing serpent with His fierce and strong sword. He will punish leviathan the twisting serpent, and He will slay the dragon in the sea. Here leviathan is a picture of the power of darkness. Both behemoth and leviathan picture Satan, his character and his rule. He is king over all the sons of pride. And now the conclusion Job could easily draw: if he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The boiling deep, on this reading, is destruction left in a wake. One writer describes the effect on the earth: "The turmoil he creates in the earth, marking it with ruin, shows his pathway."

Why God shows Job this

God had an aim in showing Job all this.

God now shows to Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him... But why would God describe the enemy's power like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do everything."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

The will that cannot be tamed

The picture also comes close to home. No one can tame the crocodile, and no one can reform the will it pictures.

Applied to each person, we see in this "crooked serpent" a picture of the perverted will of man. All sin has its roots in disobedience... What use is the effort to reform the world, to tame the crocodile? Men may dream and plan, and try to drive misery off the earth. But even while it groans, creation mocks human efforts to subdue its own perverted will.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

There is relief hidden in all this. God tells us how strong the enemy is so that we stop trying to fight him alone.

The believer looked at in himself has no power to overcome Satan... It was independence of God that opened the door to Satan at the start, and simple dependence on God alone can shut it. It is very gracious of God to tell us how strong the enemy is, so that we may know that our only resource is a firm trust in Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Creature — Leviathan is most likely a real animal, probably the crocodile: brute strength with no human intelligence. Proud man is harder to bring down than either.

- Churning — The boiling sea pictures a force that leaves everything behind it in turmoil. Several writers apply this to nations stirred up by a coming world ruler. Others read the chapter as plain nature, not a picture.

- Character — Read as a picture, leviathan stands for the power of darkness. Isaiah says the Lord will punish that serpent with His own sword.

- Confrontation — The point lands on Job. If one creature of God's terrifies a man, how could Job keep questioning God?

- Consequence — God shows us the enemy's strength so we stop trusting ourselves. The picture ends in complete dependence on Him.

Job 41:32 · Darby

He maketh the path to shine after him one would think the deep to be hoary.

God is still describing Leviathan, the creature no man can capture, and verse 32 watches him swim off through churning water. The chapter's question is not what the animal is, but what a man should think of himself after watching it.

The picture in the water

Leviathan is even more at ease in water than on land. The foam he leaves is so thick that the deep looks white-haired. One commentator measures that trail against the plainest example anyone could name:

He is still more at ease in the water, making the deep boil like a pot, and the sea like a mixture of ointment. A ship does not more clearly make its path shine after it with its white, foaming wake.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God describes it at all

God did not pile up this detail so that Job could admire nature. He gave it to move Job off his own ground:

Men talk as if God's object was merely to occupy us with His works. God, on the contrary, brings forward His works to turn us away from our thoughts and bow us to Himself. For if the works of God are so wonderful, who is He that did the work, and what is man if he dares to judge such a God? … Do you think that after this Job was occupied with behemoth or with leviathan? Not at all, but with God; and this was the design of it all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No one would dare provoke this beast. The same writer calls that the smaller danger:

He is no commodity for traders, no game for the hunter, no safe opponent in battle. The very sight of him might knock a man flat. Only a reckless man would provoke him. Yet what is that compared with making a stand before God? And who ever gave to Him, that He should repay, since everything under heaven is His?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A trail that can be read

Commentators differ on how far the chapter reaches. Some take Leviathan as a crocodile and stop there. Others see a coming world ruler in him. For them the churned, shining water is the mark he leaves on history:

"He makes the deep boil like a pot; he makes the sea like a pot of ointment" (v. 31). As Leviathan stirs up the water, so the Roman Beast will stir up the nations (the sea) into violent turmoil. The "shining wake" he leaves behind him tells us that there will be clear results from the Beast's activity.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer traces that same trail of ruin, then puts a question to Job and to us:

The turmoil he creates in the earth, marking it with ruin, shows his pathway. He has no equal upon earth. As the crocodile is king over all proud beasts, so this beast is king over all the children of pride. Shall Job, shall we, do him reverence and help on his kingdom?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The power behind the picture

If Leviathan stands for more than an animal, Job is looking at a power he could never match:

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible king he is over all the children of pride! … But what could be God's object in describing the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Where the chapter lands

The chapter closes by calling Leviathan king over the sons of pride. That title is what catches Job:

Now comes the conclusion that Job could easily draw. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out its depths. Pride, the Devil's crime, has been cherished by him. And now, with the heart laid bare by Jehovah's dealing, we shall hear Job's voice once more.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Follow the wake. Leviathan leaves the sea boiling and shining behind him. No ship marks its path more clearly.

- Follow it to the Creator. The description is not meant to make us study the beast. It is meant to bow us before the God who made it. A man who cannot face this creature cannot judge God's ways.

- Follow it through history. Some read the churned sea as the nations, stirred into turmoil by a coming world power. His work leaves clear marks behind it. Commentators differ on how far the symbolism goes.

- Follow it into your own heart. Leviathan is king over the sons of pride. So ask whether you cherish pride, and whether you will help on his kingdom.

- Follow it to dependence. This power is far greater than Job. That is why it drives him to lean wholly on God. His next words are a confession, not a defence.

Job 41:33 · Darby

Upon earth there is not his like, who is made without fear.

God's answer to Job ends with a long portrait of leviathan — an animal nothing on earth can match or frighten. Why does God close His case against a suffering, arguing man by describing a creature no one can catch?

The creature described

Writers have argued over which creature is meant. One of them names it, then draws the lesson.

The leviathan described here seems beyond doubt to be the crocodile, not the dolphin or the whale, as some learned men have argued… Nothing could be more vivid than these accounts. Nothing could be more forceful than the lesson for Job or anyone else. If such is the might of mere brutes, the product of God's creative will, what folly to resist, criticise, or even judge His ways!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fearless because untouchable

The verse calls him "a creature without fear," or as older translations put it, "made without fear." He has nothing to fear because nothing can reach him.

Strong men are afraid of him; through terror and wounds their trembling hand misses its aim. Even if a sword should touch him, it fails to wound. No weapon can reach a vital spot, whether from a distance or close at hand. Iron is trampled down like straw, brass like rotten wood. The arrow cannot make him flee. The hurtling sling-stone is like harmless chaff. He mocks darts and spears… "Upon the earth there is not his like, who is made without fear. He beholds all high things; he is a king over all the children of pride."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Something harder to subdue than a crocodile

One writer sets the beast beside a proud human being, and finds the beast the easier of the two to handle.

He called Job's attention to behemoth and to leviathan — probably the hippopotamus and the crocodile. They had brute strength but no human intelligence. It would be easier to subdue them than to bring down proud man. In Job's day human inventions had hardly begun. So this was probably not as obvious then as it is now, when people subdue these mighty creatures with ease — but not so, proud man!

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Job's own place in the picture

The picture is also a mirror. The man listening belongs somewhere in the scene.

Here the lesson is His control of creatures whose strength defies man. In that way they picture pride and unstoppable strength. They stand at the highest point of creature power. Can Job subdue or control these? No — does he not find himself morally in their company, since he has lifted himself up against God?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Pride's king, pride's subjects

Commentators differ on what the creature stands for. Some keep it as an animal that shames human pride. One writer sees in it a picture of Satan, and turns the title "king over all the sons of pride" back on Job himself.

Both the behemoth and the leviathan picture Satan, his character and his rule. He is king over all the sons of pride… And now the conclusion which Job could easily draw. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out its depths. He had cherished pride, the Devil's crime.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another writer follows the same title forward to where that pride ends.

Man's pride will reach its ultimate peak in an arrogant challenge against God. Then the Lord Jesus will meet this challenge in awesome power… This will be the fearful end of the one who "is king over all the children of pride." What a lesson for us to learn now to judge our own pride!

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The purpose behind the terror

Why paint an enemy's power so large? One writer answers from God's purpose in it.

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him… But why would God describe the power of the adversary like this? Surely it was to lead Job into entire dependence on Himself. "I know," says Job, "that You can do all things."

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Unmatched. The creature is most likely the crocodile, and no weapon touches him. Iron is straw to him, and he mocks spears.

- Unafraid. He is "a creature without fear" because no weapon on earth can wound him. His calm is not bravery; nothing can reach him.

- Unsubdued. If a beast cannot be tamed, proud man is harder still to bring down.

- Unmasked. Held up beside this creature, Job finds himself in its company; the picture searches out the pride he had cherished.

- Undone. God's aim was never to crush Job. It was to move him off his own strength into entire dependence on God — and to teach us to judge our pride now.

Job 41:34 · Darby

He beholdeth all high things; he is king over all the proud beasts.

God's long answer to Job ends with a title, not a nature lesson. Leviathan is called king over all the sons of pride. This is the last picture God gives him: a creature no one can tame. It leaves Job with one question. Whose kingdom has he been serving?

The creature and the argument

Commentators first name the animal in the picture. Then they draw the lesson it forces on Job.

The leviathan described here seems beyond doubt to be the crocodile, not the dolphin or the whale that some learned men have argued for... Nothing could be more vivid than the accounts of each. Nothing could be more forceful than the conclusion for Job or anyone else. If such is the might of mere animals, the result of God's creative will, what folly it is to resist, criticise, or even judge His ways!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Nothing tames him

The picture reaches past the animal. One writer sets behemoth beside leviathan and follows the pride behind them through history and into the individual heart.

If in behemoth we see the spirit of falling away from revealed truth in religion, in leviathan we see it in civil government... But this is looking ahead to how it comes to a head in the last days. The principle is independence of God, trying to make a name for itself. It has been visible since the days of Cain, who built a city, and of Nimrod, who founded the first great world-empire. This is not limited to whole nations. The same spirit of strong self-will shows itself in the individual too. It tolerates no contradiction. It refuses to be under authority, and nothing can tame it. Who has ever bound and held the proud will of man?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Who is the king?

Commentators differ on whom the title finally points to. Some read leviathan as a portrait of Satan himself.

God now shows Job, under the figure of leviathan, that the power of Satan is too great for him. What a terrible one this king over all the sons of pride is. This world has rejected the King of Righteousness and chosen the horrible slavery of Satan instead. But what could God's purpose be in describing the power of the adversary this way? Surely it was to lead Job into complete dependence on Himself.

Modernised from Charles StanleyOriginal wording

Others trace the same title forward to a coming world ruler, and follow the line all the way to his end.

When this Roman Beast arises, he will be in league with the Antichrist. The Antichrist will set up an idolatrous image in the temple area of Jerusalem in honour of the Beast (Rev. 13:14-15). This will be the ultimate peak of man's pride, an arrogant challenge against God. Then the Lord Jesus will meet this challenge in awesome power. Both of these enemies of God will be "thrown alive into the lake of fire" (Rev. 19:19-20). Such will be the fearful end of him who "is king over all the sons of pride." What a lesson for us! We should learn to judge our own pride now.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The point aimed at Job

The verse is not a zoology footnote. It names a class of people — the sons of pride — and it leaves Job to work out whether he belongs to it.

Both the behemoth and the leviathan represent Satan, his character and his rule. He is king over all the sons of pride... And now comes the conclusion Job could easily draw. If he is proud, then he belongs to leviathan, the king who rules over the sons of pride. Jehovah has touched the secret in Job's heart. He has searched out its depths. He had cherished pride, the Devil's crime. And now, with his heart laid bare by Jehovah's dealing, we shall hear Job's voice once more.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The choice left to Job

The picture ends with a question of loyalty. It falls to the reader as much as to Job.

As the crocodile is king over all proud beasts, so this beast is king over all the sons of pride. Shall Job — shall we — bow to him and help his kingdom along? If not, only one path was open for him, and for us.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

That one path was the collapse of the next chapter, and it came from meeting God, not from studying animals.

"Now my eye sees You." It was nothing external now, no distant rumour... Do you think that investigating the structure or habits of behemoth and leviathan would have led to anything like this? Certainly not. He had to do with God Himself, who used them for that very purpose, and had by them turned Job away from everything to Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- The king — The closing title turns pride into a kingdom, with a ruler over it.

- The subjects — Its people are the sons of pride. Their mark is independence of God. The line runs from Cain and Nimrod down to the self-will that refuses correction today.

- The identity — Commentators differ on the figure. Some see Satan behind it. Others see a coming world ruler. Both read the creature as a picture, not just an animal.

- The verdict — No one has ever bound the proud will of man. God's point was not that Job should fight leviathan. It was that Job should stop resisting God.

- The exit — The way out is to judge your own pride now. God laid Job's heart bare so that Job would depend on Him alone.