If my heart have been enticed unto a woman, so that I laid wait at my neighbour's door,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Let my wife grind for another, and let others bow down upon her.
In this chapter Job speaks under oath, listing sins he has not committed and the punishment he would accept if he lied. Verse 10 is the penalty clause: if another man's wife enticed him, let him lose his own wife.
Chapter 31 is Job's closing defence. Its force lies in its form. Job does not just deny the charges; he denies them under oath.
F. B. HoleAfter these sorrowful complaints, Job closed his long speech, as we see in Job 31. He ended with a series of strong declarations that almost amount to oaths. His friends had accused him of definite sins and wrongdoing. As to these things his conscience was clear, though, as we have seen, he admitted he was not pure in the sight of God. So he strongly affirmed that he had not committed the kinds of evil they alleged or hinted at.
The sin behind verse 10 is one his friends never charged him with. Job raises it himself.
Samuel RidoutJob opens this sevenfold protest of purity and integrity. He dwells on a side of his character and conduct that even his friends had not openly challenged. They had hinted at general wickedness — turning away from God, violent dealings with the needy and others. But they had never touched the subject of personal purity.
This oath costs Job something. He puts his own household on the line.
Samuel RidoutIn all this he was pure — willing to have his own home violated if this were not so. Here we get a glimpse of his family life, as holy as that of Isaac, Joseph, and the purest of the patriarchs.
Job's self-curses match the sins they answer. What the sin would take from another, he asks to lose himself.
William KellyMen might draw their conclusions from appearances. Job could still ask God to weigh him in a just balance, and to see whether he had used deceit or turned aside from the way. If he had, then let another reap the results of his labour. And let punishment reach even his own wife for such consuming evil on his part.
Another writer notes how settled Job's mind was about this sin:
Leslie M. GrantAgain, he insists. Suppose a woman had enticed his heart. Suppose he had taken the first step in going to his neighbour's house with evil motives. Then let his wife leave him and choose another. "For," he says, "that would be wickedness, deserving of judgment. For that would be a fire that consumes to destruction, and would root out all my increase" (vv. 11-12). He had no doubt about the wickedness of such things, even though many careless people today think otherwise.
Job could swear to verse 10 because of the promise he made in verse 1. He stopped this sin at the door, not at the deed.
Samuel RidoutJob had shut his eyes, the way into the heart, by a settled purpose — a "covenant" against even a look at what might stir up passion. In the Sermon on the Mount our Lord showed that real purity must lie in the heart. It is not just a matter of outward restraint (Matt. 5:27-28)… "How can I do this great wickedness and sin against God?" said Joseph when the temptress came at him (Gen. 39:9). In an hour of spiritual sloth, David had let his eyes wander, and had fallen (2 Sam. 11:2).
Job lived long before God gave the law. That makes this inward standard remarkable.
F. B. HoleThis chapter shows that before God gave the law, a high standard of morality was still found among God-fearing men. That standard looked not only at the outward act but also at the inward motive behind the act.
Job's claims may be true, but there is still something wrong with the speech.
Samuel RidoutBut we must take note of the self-righteousness that moved Job to speak of himself like this. He was putting himself on display rather than giving glory to God. No doubt at bottom he was a man of genuine piety, but it is no glory to set out one's own glory.
- Oath — Verse 10 is not a wish but a penalty Job accepts on himself. The chapter is a series of declarations "almost amounting to oaths."
- Offence — The sin in view is adultery with a neighbour's wife. His friends never brought that charge; Job raises it himself.
- Payment — The punishment fits the crime: take another man's wife, and lose your own. Job was willing to see his own home violated if he were guilty.
- Prevention — He could swear to this because he made a covenant with his eyes. He shut the door to the heart, and he did it long before God gave the law.
- Problem — The standard is high and the conscience clear. Yet Job is displaying himself instead of glorifying God, and he admitted he was not pure in God's sight.
For this is an infamy; yea, it is an iniquity [to be judged by] the judges
In his last speech Job swears that he is innocent of adultery. Here he names that sin for what it is — shameful in itself, and a crime for judges — though he lived long before God gave the law.
He is not claiming to be sinless before God. He is refusing his friends' charge that hidden wickedness explains his suffering.
William KellyHere, at the close of his last speech, Job makes his most solemn and complete declaration of innocence. He is not denying what he had already admitted about man's condition, his own included. But he flatly rejects the thought of grievous wickedness hidden under a fair exterior, which God might now be waging war against, as his friends had supposed.
On the charges his friends brought, his conscience was clear.
F. B. HoleHis friends had accused him of definite sins and wrongdoing. As to these things his conscience was clear, though, as we have seen, he admitted he was not pure in the sight of God. So he strongly affirmed that he had not committed the kinds of evil that were alleged or hinted at.
The "heinous crime" here is adultery with a neighbour's wife. Job adds a penalty to his denial. If he is lying, let his own home suffer the same wrong.
Samuel RidoutHe returns to the subject he began with. He dwells on the sin of adultery against a neighbour (verses 9-12). In all this he was pure — willing to have his own home violated if it were not so. We get here a glimpse of his family life, equal in holiness to that of Isaac, Joseph, and the purest of the patriarchs.
Job lived before God gave the law. Yet he can call this act a crime for judges to punish.
F. B. HoleThis chapter shows that before God gave the law, God-fearing men still held a high standard of morality. That standard looked not only at the outward act but at the inward motive behind it. See the examples: he speaks of what he thought, or did not think, in verse 1; of his heart walking after his eyes, in verse 7; and of his heart enticed in secret, in verse 27.
The same writer lists what Job already knew to be wrong without any written commandment.
F. B. HoleAgain, he knew that deceit and false witness was wrong; see verse 5: that adultery was wrong; see verse 9: that idolatry was wrong; see verses 26-28; since the worship of sun and moon was the most primitive form that idolatry took.
Job does not stop at the human court. Judges could sentence him, and God watches every step he takes.
He judges unclean lusts as well as actions. He does this in the fear of Him who had power to cast soul and body into hell — Him who meanwhile took notice of all his steps. Trusting in gold, the covetousness the New Testament calls idolatry, was as hateful to his spirit as giving the highest lights in creation the glory due to God alone. In those early days that sin seems to have been just as clearly punishable before the judge as the sins of those who schemed to destroy another man's home. (Compare verses 9-11 with verses 26-28.)
after_note: DISCUSS
The guard against this sin starts earlier, at the eye and the ear.
Hamilton SmithSet a strong guard around your outward senses. These are Satan's landing places, above all the eye and the ear. Take care what you take in through them; empty talk seldom passes without leaving some stain on the heart. And as for your eye, do not let it wander; impure objects cause impure thoughts. Job knew his eye and his thoughts were likely to go together, and so to secure the one he makes a covenant with the other.
Job's record was true. The fault lay in the telling of it.
Samuel RidoutBut we must take note of the self-righteousness that moved Job to speak of himself like this. He was putting himself on display instead of giving glory to God. No doubt at bottom he was a man of genuine piety, but it is no glory to set out one's own glory.
Another writer weighs the speech as a whole.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHe reviews his life to prove that he is clean in the sight of God and of man. But what are his declarations after all? Nothing but the filthy rags of his own righteousness — the empty boasting of a good, moral man, such as we hear on all sides.
- Covenant — Job's purity started at the eye. He made his agreement in advance, before temptation came.
- Crime — the act he refuses is adultery against a neighbour, and he stakes his own home on the truth of his denial.
- Conscience — Job knew this sin deserved punishment long before God gave the law. He judged the motive as well as the deed.
- Court — two courts sit over the same act: human judges who could sentence him, and God who counts every step he takes.
- Caution — the record was true, but Job put himself on display instead of giving God the glory.
For it is a fire that consumeth to destruction, and would root out all mine increase.
Job is at the end of his long defence. Point by point he swears to his own purity. Here he swears he never let his heart follow another man's wife. Verse 12 gives his reason: such sin is not an incident but a fire, and fire does not stop where it is lit.
This line closes the first block of Job's final speech. One writer maps the chapter out by subject:
Samuel RidoutThe main subjects of the chapter group themselves under seven heads: (1) Declaration of chastity and uprightness (verses 1-12). (2) Kindness at home and abroad (verses 13-23). (3) Refusal of all forms of idolatry (verses 24-28)…
So the "fire" is Job's closing argument on purity, not an aside. Another commentator sets the whole chapter in its setting: after describing his former brightness and then the blight that had fallen on him, Job speaks under something close to oath.
William KellyIn Job 31 he protests his innocence in the most solemn way, his personal purity, his equity and consideration of his servants, his remembrance of the poor, his horror of idolatry, his freedom from vindictiveness, his cultivation of hospitality, his refusal to conceal any wrongdoing, and this without fear before the Almighty.
The ESV keeps the word here as a name: Abaddon. Older translations render it "destruction." Either way, it is not a general word for loss.
Morrish Bible DictionaryRevelation 9:11 shows this name to be the same as Apollyon, "the destroyer," who is called "the angel of the bottomless pit." It is perhaps not so much a name of Satan as his character personified. It occurs six times in the Old Testament. Three of those link it with hell (sheol): Job 26:6; Proverbs 15:11; Proverbs 27:20. One links it with death: "Destruction and Death say," Job 28:22. One links it with the grave: Psalm 88:11. In all these passages, and in Job 31:12, it is translated "destruction."
So Job's fire burns all the way down, to the place tied to death and the grave. It does not stop at the man who lights it. It tears out everything his life has produced.
Job is not describing a passing regret. His verdict on it was settled long before, and it cuts against a common attitude today.
Leslie M. GrantHe was settled in his judgment about the wickedness of such things, though his thinking was contrary to that of large numbers of careless people today.
The fire has a starting point. Job had shut it off earlier in the chapter, and others were tested at the same place.
Samuel RidoutHis eyes, the avenue to the heart, had been closed by full purpose — a "covenant," against even a look at what might stir up passion. In the Sermon on the Mount our Lord showed that real purity must lie in the heart, and not only in outward self-control (Matthew 5:27-28)… "How then can I do this great wickedness and sin against God?" said Joseph when the woman tried to tempt him (Genesis 39:9). In an hour of spiritual sloth, David had allowed his eyes to wander, and had fallen (2 Samuel 11:2).
Job's self-examination went further than his accusers could have borne. He made it before One who sees everything.
William KellyWe can be sure of this: not one of the friends who all but accused him could have afforded to test himself as Job does here. He judges unclean lusts as well as actions; and this in the fear of Him who had power to cast soul and body into hell — Him who meanwhile took note of all his steps.
What Job says about this sin is right. The problem is who he is defending while he says it. His conscience was clear on these charges. The wrong note is in how he presses them.
Samuel RidoutBut we must notice the self-righteousness that moved Job to speak of himself like this. He was putting himself on display rather than giving glory to God. Deep down he was no doubt a man of real godliness, but there is no glory in putting your own glory on show.
Another writer shows why a clear conscience is still not righteousness before God:
F. B. HoleThis "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, had to do with his outward conduct. The searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not this… We too know that he was not, but outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness in the presence of God.
- Spark. The fire starts at the eye. Job had made a covenant there, because purity is a matter of the heart and not only of outward conduct.
- Fire. Job treats this sin as a fire. It is not one act with a boundary. Fire keeps consuming once lit.
- Ashes. Abaddon, the name behind "destruction," is linked elsewhere with death, the grave and the pit. The fire burns all the way down.
- Roots. It does not only burn what stands; it tears up a man's whole increase, everything his life had produced.
- Warning. Job's verdict on the sin is sound; his mistake is using it to display himself. A clear conscience before men is still not righteousness before God.