And Job continued his parable and said,
Job 26 ended his reply to Bildad. No one answered back, so he starts speaking again with no opponent left — and the chapter turns on one question: what does a man say when he has won the argument and still has no relief?
The three friends have been speaking in turn. At Job 27 the turn-taking stops:
In the next chapter (Job 27) it would have been Zophar's turn; but although Bildad had very little to say, Zophar had nothing. He is out of the debate for good, and we shall find that Eliphaz does not return. Job now has it all to himself. So he gives here what might have been an answer to Zophar — but there was no Zophar left to answer, because Job had silenced him. They felt they had no case left. They began with great energy, full of confidence that their judgment was sound. But Job had answered all their foolish talk completely, and there they sat in silence. It is not that they were yet convinced they were wrong. They do what many people do — they shut up, have not a word to say, and still hold the same opinion.
This verse does not open the way Job's earlier speeches open. The change of wording itself carries information:
The opening language differs from everything that has introduced Job's words up to now. It seems to imply that he paused after his reply to Bildad. The pause lasted long enough to show that Zophar and the rest had nothing more to say, though no doubt they were still unconvinced. He begins again with unusual solemnity.
The ESV says Job "took up his discourse." Older translations read "continued his parable." A reference work explains what "parable" means here:
The Old Testament uses the word "parable" many times for figurative language where no distinct parable is told. Balaam "took up his parable" (Numbers 23:7, 18), and Job "continued his parable" (Job 27:1; Job 29:1).
Job swears what comes next as an oath: "As God lives." That changes the weight of all that follows:
So Job resumed his discourse, striking a very solemn note, as one taking an oath before God. While affirming his own integrity and truth, he charged his friends with being the ones who spoke falsehood and deceit. He held fast his righteousness with all the resolve he had.
Job 27 opens a block that runs to the end of Job 31. Its subject is Job himself:
This closing speech shows us Job's heart. He defends himself. He refuses to accept the charges of his friends, and he implies that he is the one who has the true wisdom — the fear of the Lord. He then looks back on his past happiness and sets it against how low he has now fallen. He closes with fresh and complete declarations of his own righteousness.
Job is right against his friends and still not at rest. The chapters that begin here do not solve his problem:
Job has already won the debate, though he fully admits he has not found the relief he is seeking. Now he spends five chapters on his self-defence. It will get him nowhere as far as the answer to his distressing condition goes. His relatively righteous life had nothing to do with the answer to his questions.
Commentators differ on how harshly to read Job's insistence on his own righteousness. Some hear self-righteousness in it. Others hear a man who will not confess a crime he never committed. Even the reading that finds fault sees real worth mixed in:
There are certain elements of confusion in this long speech... The closing part is a sad conclusion — self-occupation, self-vindication, self-righteousness. But embedded between these two parts we have, in grand poetic beauty, a statement of what wisdom is, the true riches, unknown to the natural man. We cannot but feel that, with all he still has to unlearn, Job has the elements of this wisdom. The root of the matter is in him, the pure gold is there, and the dross will soon be removed.
- Silence. Zophar has nothing left to say, and Eliphaz never returns. The friends go quiet without changing their minds, and Job speaks on alone.
- Solemnity. The opening words differ from every earlier introduction to Job's speeches. They mark a pause and a fresh start of unusual weight.
- Speech. "Parable" here means raised, figurative language. It is the same word used when Balaam took up his parable — not a story with a hidden meaning.
- Sworn. Job speaks as a man under oath before God. He affirms his own truthfulness and charges his friends with the deceit they laid on him.
- Shortfall. He wins the debate and still finds no relief. Five chapters of self-defence cannot answer his question. Yet the gold in him is real, and the dross is about to go.
[As] God liveth, who hath taken away my right, and the Almighty, who hath embittered my soul,
Job answers his friends again, and he begins with a solemn oath. The God he swears by is the same God he accuses of denying him justice.
One writer notes the weight of Job's opening, and the contradiction inside it.
He begins again with unusual solemnity. He appeals to the living God, though he admits that it was God who turned aside His judgment and made his soul bitter for the present. He swears that as long as he breathed, his lips would not speak wickedness, and his tongue would not murmur deceit. It would only dishonour God for him to allow them to be in the right. So to his dying breath he would stand by his integrity, and hold fast his righteousness, never letting it go.
Job says God has taken away his right. One writer explains how strong that charge is.
Job declares that he will never surrender to the unrighteous charges of the friends. He declares outright that God has taken away his right — not his judgment, as older translations put it. God has acted unjustly toward him. He has brought bitterness into the soul of one who did not deserve it!
Job's two names for God make the charge stranger still — he grants everything about God except fairness toward himself.
He knows that God lives, but claims that God had taken away the justice Job felt he deserved. He knew that God is Almighty, but he accused God of making his soul bitter.
Job was right about the accusation. He was not a hypocrite, and he would not pretend to be one. But this verse gives away something his defence could not cover.
He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not this, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not. But outward correctness does not by itself count as righteousness in the presence of God. Job's own words here prove it, for the way he complains of God in verse 2 shows that his heart was not right in His sight.
Another writer weighs the same words and hears two things in them at once.
We must take this as the sober statement of one who had "lived in all good conscience." But there is a sound of self-righteousness in it. That does not fit with knowing yourself in the presence of God. Job is not there yet. It is the cry of an honest soul that does not fully see the light.
Elihu, who speaks later in the book, takes up this exact claim.
Elihu deals fairly with Job's statements. He either quotes Job's words, sums them up, or draws obvious conclusions from them. Job had time and again declared he was righteous, or guiltless. This is the whole burden of his complaint against God. He had declared that God had taken away his judgment, and that, being innocent, if he confessed sin he would be a liar.
Later, God Himself puts the matter to Job as a question.
Jehovah asks him the serious question, "Will you even put Me in the wrong? Will you condemn Me that you may be in the right? Have you an arm like God, and can you thunder with a voice like His?"
Job did not know what lay behind his suffering. That hidden purpose is the great point of the book.
There was something unusual about Job's case, which he did not know at first. God was allowing Satan to bring all these things. Satan's pleasure and hope was to trip Job up and cast him down, and to make him curse God. God allowed him to have his way, but not to kill Job. That would have suited Job. But it would not have brought out the great moral of the story: blessing brought into his soul by the very things that seemed to be against him. When he began to find fault, he had to learn what that very God is like. He could never swerve from what is excellent. And in all this He had a purpose of blessing for Job — not just outward blessing, but blessing for his soul.
- The charge. Job swears by the living God, and accuses that same God of taking away his right. God has dealt with him unjustly, he says, and embittered a soul that did not deserve it.
- The conscience. He is not lying. His integrity against his friends' accusation is real, and he will hold it to his last breath.
- The exposure. Yet a clean outward record is not righteousness before God. The way Job speaks of God here shows a heart his friends' accusations never reached.
- The answer. Elihu weighs Job's claim, and then God asks it straight: will you condemn Me to make yourself right?
- The purpose. What Job called injustice was God's purpose of blessing. It worked through the very things that seemed to be against him.
All the while my breath is in me, and the spirit of +God is in my nostrils,
Job's three friends have charged him with being a deceiver, and in chapter 27 he answers them with an oath sworn on the breath still in him. What is that breath, and is a clear conscience enough before God?
Job swears into silence. His friends have run out of replies, and one commentator names who is missing.
In the next chapter (Job 27) it would have been Zophar's turn; but although Bildad had very little to say, Zophar had nothing. He is out of the debate... Job had answered all their foolish talk, and there they were silent. It is not that they were yet convinced they were wrong; but they do what many people do — they shut up, and have not a word to say, and still hold the same opinion.
The words about breath belong to an oath. Job stops arguing and starts swearing. He calls God to witness, then turns the charge of falsehood back on his friends.
He still holds that all their imagining was false. He said now more solemnly than ever — it was a kind of swearing to it — As God lives, this is true... Now he turns on them; he says, "You are the culprits, not I."
Some have used this wording to argue that God's Spirit is only the principle of life in every living thing. One writer answers from the Hebrew word itself.
Some argue that the Spirit of God is in the nostrils, and so is only the principle of life in every living thing, because Job 27:3 in the older common translation speaks that way. I can only say the argument is worthy of men who quote Greek and Hebrew freely when they choose. Here they are pleased to ignore that one of the commonest renderings of ruach is "breath." They also ignore that the expression refers to Genesis 2:7, where the word for "breath of life" is a word never applied to the Spirit of God at all.
Breath in the nostrils is also a picture of frailty. The same writer says frailty is only half the story.
It is quite true that man's breath in his nostrils marks how soon he passes away. Isaiah appeals to it in this way (Isaiah 2:22). But that does not touch the meaning of the words "God breathed" — that, as Elihu says, the "inspiration of the Almighty gave him life" (Job 33:4) [ESV: "the breath of the Almighty gives me life"]. The language may be figurative, and full of a mystery that has not yet shown itself. Still, it should be plain that God gives man something that puts him in kinship with God as the beast never is.
Commentators differ on how the sentence runs.
Verse 3 has been translated in different ways. The older English version has Job saying that as long as his breath is in him, he will keep insisting on his righteousness. But many take the verse as an explanation in parentheses: "for still all my breath is in me," and so on. He is fully aware of what he is saying, and speaks the truth deliberately, as he believes it. Such a rendering and explanation seems to agree with the original.
Job's denial of deceit was accurate. The trouble is what he was defending, and the complaint he had just made in the previous verse.
This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, had to do with his outward conduct, for the searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not — but outward correctness does not by itself count as righteousness in the presence of God. Job's own words here prove it, for the way he complains of God in verse 2 shows that his heart was not right in His sight.
The tone of the vow raises another problem.
There is a sound of self-righteousness here that does not fit with knowing yourself in the presence of God. Job is not there yet. It is the cry of an honest soul that does not yet fully see the light.
- Borrowed breath. The breath Job swears by points back to Genesis 2:7, where God breathed life into man.
- Frail breath. Breath in the nostrils shows how soon a life can end, and Isaiah appeals to that same fact.
- Dignified breath. The same inbreathing gives man a kinship with God that no animal has.
- Honest breath. Job knew what he was saying and meant it. He was not the hypocrite his friends made him out to be.
- Not enough. A clear conscience toward men is not righteousness before God. Job's complaint in verse 2 shows a heart not yet right with Him.
My lips shall not speak unrighteousness, nor my tongue utter deceit!
Three rounds of speeches have accused Job of hiding secret sin behind a religious front. Now Zophar, the third of his accusers, has fallen silent, and Job takes the floor. He swears an oath that his mouth will not betray the truth. Two questions follow. What does such a promise about clean lips mean? And can a man be right about his own honesty and still be wrong before God?
Job speaks last because no one is left to answer him:
Job has answered Bildad as well as Eliphaz; and now Zophar, the third and last of his critics, is silent. Not so Job; he has more to say, to which he gives a weighty form. He swears by the living God that he would never, while he lived, admit that the suspicions against him were right. He would not give up the assertion of his integrity. God had not vindicated him yet; on the contrary, He had called him to a most bitter trial. And they indeed were the guilty people who falsely accused him.
The pledge about his lips is not a casual remark. It is sworn speech:
He still stands by it that all their imagination was false. He said now more solemnly than ever — it was a kind of swearing to it — as God lives, this is true.
The oath cuts both ways. Job claims truthfulness for himself and hands the charge straight back:
So Job resumed his discourse, striking a very solemn note, as taking an oath before God. He affirmed his own integrity and truth. In doing so he charged his friends with being the ones who spoke falsehood and deceit, while he held fast his righteousness with the utmost resolution. This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, had to do with his outward conduct, for the searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. They had charged him with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know he was not. But outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness in the presence of God.
Commentators read the line just before, verse 3, in two ways:
The next verse, 3, has been rendered in various ways. The Authorised Version makes Job say that so long as his breath is in him, he will keep maintaining his righteousness. But many regard the verse as a parenthesis that explains: "for still all my breath is in me," and so on. He is fully conscious, and speaks the truth deliberately, as he believes.
No pressure from his friends will move him:
But as long as he lives (v. 3) he is determined that he will not yield to sin. Whatever the three friends allege, he will not admit a false charge (v. 5). Despite their harsh judgment, he is determined to hold to the integrity of all his former life until the day he dies.
Job is telling the truth, and that is still not the whole story. He measures himself against his accusers, not against God:
He will not allow himself to bear false witness; till he dies he will hold fast his integrity. His heart does not condemn him… But there is a sound of self-righteousness here. It does not match the self-knowledge a man has in the presence of God. Job is not there yet. It is the cry of an honest soul that does not fully see the light… We see, then, that Job was speaking as between man and man.
The uprightness itself was real. What went wrong was the use Job made of it:
Job was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That plainly proves he had never really been in the presence of God.
The same lips raise a daily question for us:
Perhaps it is good to ask ourselves: "What do I use my lips for?" Surely not for tale-bearing? How we need to pray daily: "…keep the door of my lips" (Psalm 141:3; Job 27:4).
- Sworn, not said. Job's pledge about his lips is an oath by the living God. It is his most solemn speech yet, aimed at friends who called him a deceiver.
- Breath-long. The vow runs as long as he can breathe. Commentators differ over verse 3: does it set that span, or does it note that Job knows exactly what he is saying?
- Costly honesty. He could have ended the argument by confessing a sin he never committed. He refuses. He will not admit a false charge, even to buy relief.
- Right toward men. His conscience clears him. But he is arguing between man and man, and outward correctness is not righteousness before God.
- The hidden turn. Real uprightness becomes a trap the moment a man makes it his righteousness. The honest answer to Job's vow is to pray that God would keep the door of our lips.
Be it far from me that I should justify you; till I die I will not remove my blamelessness from me.
Job's friends have been charging him with serious wrong, and he answers with something close to an oath: he will keep his integrity until he dies. Is this the courage of an honest man, or the self-defence of a man who has not yet seen himself as God sees him?
Job turns the charge back on the men who made it, and he says it with the force of an oath.
He still holds to it that all their imagination was false. He said now more solemnly than ever — it was like taking an oath — as God lives, this is true. "God forbid that I should justify you." Now he turns on them; he says, "You are the culprits, not I." "Till I die I will not remove my integrity from me. My righteousness I hold fast, and will not let it go; my heart shall not reproach me so long as I live." They were, on the contrary, charging him with what was very bad in most of their speeches.
The ESV reads, "Far be it from me to say that you are right." Older translations read "justify you," and the commentators work from that older word. One writer sets Job's use of it beside God's own use.
The word translated "justify" occurs in that precise form of the verb only in Exodus 23:7: "I will not acquit the wicked"; that is, God will not make or declare a wicked man a just man. Again, "God forbid that I should justify you" (Job 27:5); that is, acknowledge you to be just in what you have spoken.
Older translations read "I will not justify the wicked" in Exodus 23:7 — the same word again. So Job is not claiming sinlessness here. He is refusing to sign off on his friends' reading of his life.
Job will not confess to a wrong he did not do. One writer sets his stand beside Paul, who also kept a good conscience.
Whatever the three friends allege, he will not admit a false charge (v. 5). Despite their harsh judgment, he is determined to pursue the integrity of all his former life to the day of his death. In this setting he says, "My righteousness I hold fast, and will not let it go." That is, nothing could turn him to turn from what he knew to be right. He therefore adds, "My heart shall not reproach me so long as I live." He was for keeping a good conscience all his days, like Paul later.
God Himself calls Job blameless and says he holds fast his integrity — the very thing Job clings to here. He also defends His servant against every accuser.
He points out their failures faithfully. He records the details that men would have hidden. But He will not allow others to speak against them. If a Balaam would curse them, he must bless instead. If Satan would harm Job, God would speak of him as "my servant Job — none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil; and he still holds fast his integrity."
Commentators differ on Job's tone. One writer grants Job's honesty but still hears self-righteousness in these words.
He will not allow himself to bear false witness; till he dies he will hold fast his integrity. His heart does not condemn him. Looking back over his past life, there is not a day whose record gives ground for reproach... But there is a sound of self-righteousness that does not fit with knowing yourself in the presence of God. Job is not there yet. It is the cry of an honest soul that does not yet fully see the light. Is there any unrighteousness? — it is in his enemy, not in himself. We see, then, that Job was speaking as between man and man.
One writer looks ahead to what Job's righteousness had to become.
He would by no means surrender his integrity, he would by no means let go his righteousness. But, as Elihu puts it, his "righteousness," or his "uprightness," would now be to bow under God's hand, to trust the searching of His discipline, and to learn the lesson God would teach. In short, it would be to look away from himself to God, and to live on that new principle before Him, centred in the Lord and no longer in self.
- Integrity given. God named Job's integrity before Job ever defended it, and would not let others speak against His servant.
- Integrity defended. To "justify" his friends would mean calling them right. Job refuses that. He is not claiming to be sinless.
- Integrity as conscience. He will not confess a crime he did not commit; he means to keep a clear conscience to his dying day.
- Integrity misplaced. The same words carry a note of self-righteousness: he is arguing man to man, not yet standing in the light of God.
- Integrity relocated. He never has to let his integrity go. He must hold it in a new way — bowing under God's hand, centred in God and not in himself.
My righteousness I hold fast, and will not let it go my heart reproacheth [me] not one of my days.
Job's friends have accused him of hidden sin, and in chapter 27 he answers with something close to an oath: he will not confess to sins he never did. Is this the steady voice of a clear conscience, or the first sound of a self-righteousness God will later strip away?
Job's reply is a refusal to agree with his accusers.
He still stands by it that all their imagining was false. He said now more solemnly than ever — it was a kind of swearing to it — as God lives, this is true. "God forbid that I should justify you." Now he turns on them; he says, "You are the culprits, not I."
Some read the verse as though Job were claiming to earn God's acceptance. One writer says that reading does not fit the book.
That reading is unlikely on the face of it. The righteousness of God in the gospel sense was not revealed until the gospel came. Satan was allowed to test Job, but not to discover whether he had soul-salvation and a righteous footing before God. The test was whether Job feared God because of his prosperity and material advantages, which Satan claimed were quite enough to produce piety in a man.
Read in its own chapter, the grip Job describes is on conduct, not on standing.
In this setting he says, "I hold fast my righteousness and will not let it go." Nothing could make him turn from what he knew to be right. So he adds, "my heart does not reproach me for any of my days." He was for keeping a good conscience all his days, like Paul later.
The second half of the verse is true as far as it goes. One commentator hears in it both integrity and a warning.
He will not let himself bear false witness; until he dies he will hold fast his integrity. His heart does not condemn him. Looking back over his past life, there is not a day whose record gives ground for reproach… We must take this as the sober statement of a man who had "lived in all good conscience." But there is a sound of self-righteousness that does not match knowing yourself in the presence of God. Job is not there yet. It is the cry of an honest soul that does not fully see the light.
Job's uprightness was real. The danger was in what he made of it.
Job had these spiritual affections, but they did not stop him. He turned this consciousness of integrity into a robe of self-righteousness. It hid God from him, and even hid him from himself. He declares himself to be more righteous than God.
His record was clean. But it could not do the work he asked of it.
This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, had to do with his outward conduct, for as yet the searching light of God had not entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not, but outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness in the presence of God.
A good conscience is not worthless. It simply belongs in a different place.
Now we do need practical righteousness and a good conscience as well as faith to resist the enemy, as we see in Ephesians 6. But we want something far brighter than this armour as a robe before God; we want divine righteousness here; and this Job had to learn. He had confused the two things, as many a believer does today, to his own loss and to God's dishonour.
Job never had to become careless. His grip needed a new object.
He would by no means surrender his integrity, he would by no means let go his righteousness. But, as Elihu puts it, his "righteousness," or his "uprightness," would now be to bow under God's hand. It would be to trust the searchings of His discipline, and to learn the lesson God would teach. In short, it would be to look away from himself to God, and to live on that new principle before Him, centred in the Lord and no longer in self.
- Hold fast — rightly. Job's grip is on his conduct and on his refusal to confess sins he never did. He is not claiming his own merit makes him right with God.
- Hold fast — honestly. Job's clear conscience is real, not a pose. Commentators call it the sober word of an honest man.
- Hold fast — too tightly. The same integrity became a robe of self-righteousness that hid God from him and hid him from himself.
- Hold the right thing before God. You need a good conscience for daily life. But it was never the robe to wear in God's presence.
- Hold fast to Him. Job's uprightness was not cancelled. It was redirected — bowing under God's hand, trusting His discipline, centred on God and not on self.
Let mine enemy be as the wicked, and he that riseth up against me as the unrighteous.
Job has reached the end of a long argument with his three friends, and he begins again under oath. In verse 7 he turns their charge back on them — and readers ask whether this is a curse, a wish for revenge, or something else.
His friends had spent chapter after chapter describing the wicked man and fitting Job into the picture. Here he refuses the label and hands it back:
He still stands by it that everything they imagined was false. He said it now more solemnly than ever — it was a kind of swearing to it — as God lives, this is true. "Far be it from me to say that you are right." Now he turns on them; he says, "You are the culprits, not I." … "Let my enemy be as the wicked, and let him who rises up against me be as the unrighteous." That is what he says. "It is you who are acting the part of wicked men without knowing it. It is you who are the unrighteous, not I."
The wish can sound vindictive. But it follows from what Job has just sworn about himself: if his conscience does not accuse him, someone else in this dispute must be in the wrong:
His conscience really was good; his heart did not reproach him for anything he had done. He knew of nothing that could account for his trials; yet in saying that, he had already admitted he was not justified. But what could he think of those who used the trials that were crushing him? He could reach only one conclusion: if he was innocent, then those who took the place of his enemy must count as the wicked party, and those who attacked him as the unrighteous.
The "enemy" is defined by the dispute itself, and the definition lands on the friends:
Job ends this section by expressing a desire. He wants his enemy — the one who opposed his claim of righteousness — to be like the wicked, not worth considering. He wants the one who rose against him in his claim to be like the unrighteous, a contrast to Job himself (v.7). If this applied to his friends, let them consider it!
Notice where Job puts the wrong: outside himself. His conscience is clear, yet something is missing:
He will not allow himself to bear false witness; until he dies he will hold fast his integrity. His heart does not condemn him… But there is a sound of self-righteousness in it that does not fit with knowing yourself in the presence of God. Job is not there yet. It is the cry of an honest soul that does not yet fully see the light. Is there any unrighteousness? — it is in his enemy, not in himself. We see, then, that Job was speaking as between man and man.
Job was right about the facts. But his own words earlier in this chapter give him away:
He held fast to his righteousness with complete determination. This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, was about his outward conduct, because the searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not this, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not, but outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness in the presence of God. Job's own words here prove it, for the way he complains of God in verse 2 shows that his heart was not right in His sight.
Job here wants his accuser judged as wicked. By the end of the book he judges himself instead — and not because anyone won the debate:
His friends had no proof at all against what Job said, for his actions had been good. But at the end of this book Job's attitude is wonderfully changed. The one who had such confidence in his own righteousness, when face to face with God, said, "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes" (ch. 42:5-6). The question of his good conduct was set aside entirely when he saw, not merely his past life, but himself in the light of God's presence. He abhorred himself, rather than defending himself.
- Accusation — his friends had fitted Job into their picture of the wicked man. Verse 7 sends the label back: it is you who are the unrighteous, not I.
- Logic — the wish is a conclusion, not spite. If Job is innocent, then those attacking him must be the wrong party.
- Enemy — the "enemy" is whoever opposes his claim of righteousness. That points straight at his three friends.
- Level — he finds all the unrighteousness outside himself. That shows he is still pleading his case between man and man, not before God.
- Outcome — his conduct was blameless, but outward correctness is not righteousness before God. The argument ends only when Job sees God, stops defending himself, and repents.
For what is the hope of the ungodly, when [God] cutteth him off, when +God taketh away his soul?
Job's friends have accused him of hypocrisy, and he denies it flatly. He turns their own word back on them and asks what a pretender is left with when God takes his life.
Job holds on to his integrity to his dying day, and he names who he thinks the guilty party really is.
Now he turns on them; he says, "You are the guilty ones, not I." "Till I die I will not remove my integrity from me. My righteousness I hold fast, and will not let it go." ... "It is you who are acting the part of wicked men without knowing it." ... "For what is the hope of the hypocrite, though he has gained, when God takes away his soul?" It shows that he had a great hatred of it — as much as they had, or more.
Where the ESV says "godless," older translations read "hypocrite." The word covers more than play-acting: it marks a man as profane. And for God to take away his life is for God to summon his soul.
He was at least as sure as they were that the hope of the hypocrite or profane man must perish when God summons his soul.
Job allows that pretending can pay well in this world. His question is what that profit is worth on the day God takes the man's life.
Job's friends had accused him of hypocrisy, but he asks them about the hypocrite's end. Though he gained much in this world, what can he do when God takes away his life? "Will God hear his cry when distress comes upon him?" (v.9). In fact, would a hypocrite delight himself in God so much as to call upon God Himself? (v.10). It is not the character of such an evil man to really call on God, yet it was clear to Job's friends that Job was crying out to God in his affliction.
The warning turns on timing. Some prayers come too late.
Job now turns to the end of the wicked. What hope has he when God cuts him off and takes away his soul? What shall be the end of the man to whom God says, "Fool! This night your soul is required of you"? Will God hear his cry when it is too late? Or has He not given the solemn warning, "I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when terror strikes you" (Prov. 1:26)? Is it too late to call upon God when the present opportunities have been put off for a "more convenient season" — which never comes?
The verse warns the pretender, but it can also frighten a sincere believer. Stanley sets two hopes side by side: the shallow hearer's and the believer's.
This is all true of the hearers on stony ground; but it is not true of Job — and not true of the soul that sincerely trusts in Christ. The water that is in him is a well of water, springing up to everlasting life. "The hypocrite's hope shall perish," but the feeblest sheep of Christ shall never perish.
Job was right that he was no pretender. That is not the same as being right with God, and the chapter's opening complaint shows it.
He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not this, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not, but outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness in the presence of God. Job's own words here prove it, for the way he complains of God in verse 2 shows that his heart was not right in His sight.
- Gain — pretending can pay well in this world. Job grants it. The question is what that gain is worth when God takes the soul away.
- Hope — the hypocrite's hope rests on what he gained, so it dies when he dies. The one who trusts Christ has a hope death cannot touch.
- Cry — a man who never delighted in God or called on Him has no voice God answers when the trouble lands.
- Too late — chances to call on God get put off for a better moment that never comes. Then the cry itself comes too late.
- Integrity — Job was no pretender, and he was right to say so. But clean conduct is not righteousness before God, and his own complaint in this chapter shows his heart needed more.
Will God hear his cry when distress cometh upon him?
Job's friends have hinted for chapter after chapter that his suffering proves he is a fraud. He answers with their own subject — the end of the godless man — and one blunt question: does God listen when disaster catches a pretender?
A man under attack asks this question, and he aims it back at his accusers. One commentator reads the whole passage as Job's answer to a silenced opponent:
He still stands by it that all their imagining was false. He now spoke more solemnly than ever — it was a kind of oath — as God lives, this is true... Now he turns on them; he says, "You are the culprits, not I." ... "For what is the hope of the hypocrite, though he has gained, when God takes away his soul?" It shows that he hated it deeply — just as much as they did, or more.
The cry Job describes is not the prayer of a lifetime. It is the noise a man makes when the account closes and he has nothing left to bargain with:
Job now turns to the end of the wicked. What hope has he when God cuts him off and takes away his soul? What shall be the end of the man to whom God says, "Fool! This night your soul is required of you"? Will God hear his cry when it is too late? Or has He not given the solemn warning, "I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when terror strikes you" (Proverbs 1:26)? Is it too late to call on God when a man has put off today's opportunities for a "more convenient season" — which never comes?
Scripture records a man who did this. Saul asked God for help when everything was lost, and another book of the Bible says he did not ask at all:
Look for a moment at 1 Samuel 28:6: "And when Saul inquired of the Lord." Now compare 1 Chronicles 10:14: "And did not inquire of the Lord." Samuel records the outward act. The Holy Spirit in Chronicles pronounces God's judgment on the inward condition of his soul. The pressure of despair wrung a useless cry out of his heart, but there was no real turning to Him. He never shuts out the most desperate cry from a soul that is truly broken. All help was gone, and in his fear he inquires of the Lord whom he had habitually disobeyed and neglected.
(Older translations use "inquire" in both verses; the ESV has "did not seek guidance from the LORD" in 1 Chronicles 10:14.)
God's silence is not a random refusal. It matches the life behind the cry:
He was at least as sure as they were that the hope of the hypocrite or profane man must perish when God summons his soul. He was equally sure that God does not hear his cry when the long-delayed trouble falls on him. Such a man neither delights in God at any time nor calls on Him at all times.
Job's friends could see the answer with their own eyes. All through his ruin he kept crying to God:
Job's friends had accused him of hypocrisy, but he asks them about the hypocrite's end. Though he gained much in this world, what can he do when God takes away his life?... It is not in the character of such an evil man to truly call on God. Yet it was obvious to Job's friends that Job was crying out to God in his affliction.
But a clear conscience is not the same as seeing yourself in God's presence:
His heart does not condemn him. Looking back over his past life, there is not a day whose record gives ground for reproach... But there is a sound of self-righteousness that does not fit with knowing oneself in the presence of God. Job is not there yet. It is the cry of an honest soul that does not fully see the light.
- Cry — The cry in this verse arrives only when trouble does. The man had no use for God until disaster forced the words out.
- Gain — Whatever the hypocrite has gained is worth nothing the moment God takes away his soul. Calling on God then can be too late.
- Character — God's silence answers a whole life, not one moment. This man never delighted in God and never called on Him.
- Contrast — Saul's cry was despair, not repentance. God never turns away a truly broken soul.
- Job — His friends could see him crying to God in his misery, and that is the one thing a pretender does not do. Yet his defence still has a self-righteous ring: he has not yet seen himself in God's light.
Doth he delight himself in the Almighty? will he at all times call upon +God?
Job's friends have called him a hypocrite, and here he answers by describing what a hypocrite really looks like. His question is a test anyone can apply: does this person take pleasure in God, and does he keep praying when the answer is slow?
Job's friends had insisted his suffering proved he was a fraud. He answers by asking what a fraud looks like when life collapses.
Job's friends had accused him of hypocrisy, but he asks them about the hypocrite's end. Though he gained much in this world, what can he do when God takes away his life? "Will God hear his cry when distress comes upon him?" (v.9). In fact, would a hypocrite delight himself in God to such an extent as to call upon God Himself? (v.10). It is not the character of such an evil man to really call on God, yet it was evident to Job's friends that Job was crying out to God in his affliction.
The question is not theoretical. Job is pointing at himself: both marks were true of him in his worst distress.
"Will he delight himself in the Almighty?" That is what Job did. "Will he always call upon God?" He called upon God even in that terrible distress… "You know very well that I have been clinging to God; you have heard my confession, and why do you charge me with something like hypocrisy?"
Affliction shows the difference between a sincere believer and a pretender. It shows it in two ways.
Sincerity lets the Christian do two things in affliction that the hypocrite cannot — speak good of God, and expect good from God.
Anyone can pray now and then. Job asks about calling on God "at all times" — older translations say "always." That is where pretence breaks down, especially when the answer is slow.
"Will he always call upon God?" (Job 27:10). The hypocrite is often exposed here. An unsound heart will dabble with prayer now and then, but grows weary of the work at last, especially if he is made to wait a long time for an answer. Saul prays to God, and because he hears nothing from Him, he finally goes to seek the devil.
The other side of the test is why a real believer cannot stop.
Faith enables the soul to persevere in prayer. "Will the hypocrite always call upon God?" (Job 27:10). No, he prays himself weary of praying; sooner or later something will make him quarrel with what he never really liked. But the sincere believer has something in him that makes it impossible for him to give up praying altogether, unless he also gives up believing. Prayer is the very breath of faith; stop a man's breath, and where is he then?
Job's earlier question in verse 9 sets up verse 10. The person who never called on God while he could will call on Him when it no longer helps.
Job now turns to the end of the wicked. What hope has he when God cuts him off and takes away his soul? What shall be the end of the man to whom God says, "Fool! This night your soul is required of you"? Will God hear his cry when it is too late? Or has He not given the solemn warning, "I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when terror strikes you" (Prov. 1:26)? Is it too late to call upon God when the present opportunities have been put off for a "more convenient season" — which never comes?
Satan still turns this question against sincere people. A believer in a dark season, whose prayers feel dry, can read it as a verdict against himself.
This is still a painful temptation from Satan. When the soul is going through darkness, it often seems as if it could not pray — so different from what it once was. "There now," says Satan, "isn't that proof that you are nothing but a wicked person? Surely you must be a hypocrite." "For the company of the godless is barren, and fire consumes the tents of bribery." "The wicked man writhes in pain all his days." "Oh dear," says the believer, "that is exactly how it is with me. I do not enjoy prayer as I once did. I am filled with pain."
- Delight — The first mark of a real relationship with God is pleasure in Him. Job says a pretender has no such taste, and points to his own clinging to God as proof.
- Prayer — The second mark is calling on God. It is not in a hypocrite's character to call on God, yet Job's friends could see him crying out in his affliction.
- At All Times — The test is not whether a person prays, but whether he keeps praying when the answer is slow. Pretence gets weary of the work; faith cannot stop, because prayer is its breathing.
- Too Late — The one who postpones God until a more convenient season will cry out at the end, when the opportunity is gone.
- Assurance — Dryness in prayer is not the same as hypocrisy. Satan turns this question into an accusation, but a believer in the dark need not accept his verdict.
I will teach you concerning the hand of God; what is with the Almighty will I not conceal.
The friends have argued themselves into silence. Job now takes the floor and does to them what they had been doing to him — he gives a lesson about God. The question is whether Job, of all people, is fit to teach anyone about the hand of God.
No one is left to answer Job, so he keeps talking. One commentator describes how the three friends collapsed, and what their silence really meant:
In the next chapter (Job 27) it would have been Zophar's turn; but although Bildad had very little to say, Zophar had nothing. He is out of the debate, and we shall find that Eliphaz does not return. Job now has it all to himself... They began with great vigour, confident that their judgment was sound. But Job had completely answered all their foolish talk, and there they sat silent. They were not yet convinced that they were wrong. They do what many people do — they shut up, say nothing, and still hold the same opinion. But God would not allow it to rest there. He brought them out of their hiding place and passed judgment on them. Later in the book it is through Job that they are saved from a terrible judgment, or even from death.
Job names his subject: the hand of God. One commentator points out the irony in that offer:
Job therefore realised that his friends needed teaching about the hand of God, so he would teach them (v.11). It was true that they needed such teaching. But Job himself needed teaching of a different kind than he thought his friends needed, for "the hand of God" is a tremendous subject. What Job knew about God's hand he would not conceal. But there was much indeed that he did not know, as we all must admit in our ignorance.
The second half of the verse points to what is with the Almighty. That title is the book's own word for God, and it carries a particular force:
Some interpret the name as "Almighty in sustaining resources" (like a mother's breasts for her baby). It occurs 48 times in the Old Testament, and the book of Job accounts for no fewer than 31 of them. In that book the thought stands out above all others that the Lord is Almighty. That seems to fit the book well. In it we have the story of God's controversy with Job. He got no relief or blessing until he came to a right estimate of himself in the presence of God.
In the verses that follow, Job describes the ruin of the wicked man. It sounds almost exactly like the friends' own speeches. That is deliberate:
Here we reach the explanation of the apparent change in Job's attitude. Until now he had resisted the friends' arguments about the wicked. He did so because they kept linking him with their descriptions. He will now take up the same language himself. That shows how impossible it was to confuse a man like himself with the wicked they identified him with. It becomes in this way a most powerful reply to their charges.
Job's point is that they already have the evidence in front of them. He presses the thing they had all watched him do:
"Will he take delight in the Almighty?" That is what Job did. "Will he call upon God at all times?" He called upon God even in that terrible distress... "You know very well that I have been clinging to God; you have heard my confession, so why do you charge me with hypocrisy?"
Job offers to hide nothing. Yet what he lacked was not facts about God but sight of himself. One commentator names what Job still had to learn:
Job must know himself, as he never could have imagined otherwise. To know oneself is a very different thing from being converted to God, and it is necessary if we are to be fully blessed. Further, the friends had to learn as well as Job, being objects of a similar grace, though far below Job. They were godly men; but a man may be godly and yet never have really stood in the presence of God for himself.
- Silence. Job speaks because the three friends have run out of arguments. Their silence was not agreement, and God did not leave the matter there.
- Subject. He picks a tremendous subject: the hand of God. He promises to hold nothing back.
- Source. He appeals to the Almighty — the title that fills this book. Some read the name as God's endless resources to sustain.
- Sting. His "lesson" is a reply. By describing the wicked man's end in the friends' own language, he shows how absurd it is to put him in that category.
- Student. The man offering to teach still had the deepest lesson ahead of him — and so did his hearers. Knowing about God is not yet knowing yourself in His presence.
Behold, ye yourselves have all seen [it]; and why are ye thus altogether vain?
Job's three friends have run out of answers, and he holds the floor for the rest of the debate. In verse 12 he turns on them: they had watched God at work with their own eyes, so why was everything they said so empty?
First, see who is left in the debate. The friends have gone quiet, and Job speaks without interruption.
Although Bildad had very little to say, Zophar had nothing. He is completely out of the debate... Job has it now all to himself. They began with great energy, full of confidence that their judgment was a sound one. But Job had answered all their foolish talk completely, and there they were silent. They were not yet convinced that they were wrong. They simply did what many people do: they stopped talking, with not a word left to say, and still held the same opinion.
Just before this verse Job offers to teach his friends about the hand of God and hide nothing. That offer has an irony inside it.
Job realised that his friends needed teaching about the hand of God, so he would teach them (v.11). They did need such teaching. But Job himself needed a different kind of teaching from the kind he thought his friends needed, because "the hand of God" is a huge subject. What Job knew about God's hand he would not hide. Yet there was much he did not know, as we all must realise in our ignorance.
Job does not say his friends lacked evidence. The problem was what they did with it.
Still, he tells his friends that they had seen God's hand at work. Instead of thinking soberly about what these actions of God involved, they were behaving with complete nonsense! (v.12).
Job's complaint is also personal. His friends had evidence about him too, not only about God. One commentator puts Job's point in his own voice:
'You know very well that I have been holding on to God; you have heard my confession, and why do you charge me with a thing like hypocrisy?'
Their words were empty for a reason. The problem was the rule they started from.
Their error was by no means unusual. You find it especially among the righteous, who know God but have never been thoroughly broken down about themselves... Here is where they went astray: they assumed that the present state of the world is an adequate expression of God's judgment of men's ways. This assumption runs through the speeches of the three friends. At first they expressed it calmly enough, but at last it hardened into severity.
Measured against that, Job's question answers itself. They were arguing against what they had already seen with their own eyes.
Is not all this self-evident? Job asks them. Do they not know the Lord's ways? Why then do they indulge in such foolish and wrong thoughts as they had expressed, and charge him — a man whose uprightness they knew, and who was conscious of his own integrity — with having a character like the one he describes?
Job wins the argument with his friends. Winning it does not settle how he stands before God.
As he affirmed his own integrity and truth, he charged his friends with being the ones who spoke falsehood and deceit. He held fast to his righteousness with the utmost resolution. This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, was about his outward conduct. The searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not this, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not. But outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness in the presence of God.
From verse 13 onward Job himself describes what happens to the wicked. That looks like a sudden switch, and there is a reason for it.
Up to now he had resisted the friends in their arguments about the wicked. They always linked him with their descriptions. He will now take up the same language himself. It shows how impossible it was to confuse a man like himself with the wicked they identified him with, and so it becomes a most powerful reply to their charges.
- Seen. The friends had watched God's hand at work and had watched Job's life. His question rests on what they already knew.
- Said. What they saw and what they said did not match. They had the evidence and still talked nonsense.
- Empty. Their talk was empty because their rule was false. They assumed the world as it looks now shows God's full verdict on a man.
- Silent. Running out of arguments is not the same as changing your mind. They went quiet and kept the same opinion.
- Unfinished. Job was right against his friends and still unfinished with God. He offered to teach them about God's hand while needing another kind of teaching himself. His clean record was outward conduct, not righteousness before God.
This is the portion of the wicked man with God, and the heritage of the violent, which they receive from the Almighty --
Job's friends kept describing the ruin that falls on a wicked man, and kept aiming that description at Job. Here he takes up their theme himself: what God hands out to the wicked, and to the violent men who crush others.
Job stops defending himself and starts teaching. One writer traces what pushed him into it.
They had proved themselves incapable of applying it fairly. So he would let them know the sure end of ungodliness: disasters, outside and inside, for the wicked man's children as for himself. They go on until every trace of ill-gotten gain vanishes. Then death opens the doom he cannot avoid — the doom of the man whom men, if not the wind itself, hiss out of his place, delighting in his destruction.
Job had argued with his friends for chapters. Now he suddenly sounds like them. One writer reads the change as a deliberate move.
Here we reach the explanation of the apparent change in Job's attitude. Up to now he had resisted the friends in their argument about the wicked. They always linked him with their descriptions. He will now take up the same language himself. It shows how impossible it was to confuse a man like himself with the wicked they identified him with. It becomes in this way a most powerful reply to their charges.
The verse names two kinds of men — the wicked, and the violent who crush others — and gives them one end. It names a share and an inheritance, and both come from God's hand, not man's. Whatever the wicked man collected from people, this is what waits for him from the One he despised.
"This is the portion of a wicked man with God." He has received wealth and pleasure and honour at the hands of man. But how different an inheritance they will get from the Almighty whom they have despised! Have his children multiplied? They are left to the devouring sword. Did they once live in luxury? They will come to lack bread.
Almost this exact sentence had already closed one of Zophar's earlier speeches. One writer weighs the words and the aim separately.
So Zophar ends his speech, "This is the portion from God for a wicked man, the heritage appointed to him by God." There was a good deal of truth in what he said, but his inference that Job belonged to such a class of evildoers was not only unfair; it was inexcusably false.
A true description of judgment turns cruel the moment someone pins it on the wrong man.
Job's losses looked much like the ruin he is reciting. One writer presses the difference.
Job dwells on a sorrow that in some ways looks like his own, and yet how different it is. He too had lost his children — but was that under the punishing wrath of God? And did Job act like these wicked men he describes here? They may gather silver and wealth like dust, only to have the righteous enjoy it — "The wealth of the sinner is laid up for the just." Was Job's case like that? ... Job can speak this way about the perishing things of this world's greatness. That shows he was conscious of a far different inheritance for himself. Let moth and rust destroy — he seems to say that he knows he has a better and lasting possession.
Just before this verse, Job offers to teach his friends about the hand of God. One writer notes that the offer cuts both ways.
Job therefore realised that his friends needed teaching about the hand of God, so he would teach them. It was true that they needed such teaching. Yet Job himself needed a different kind of teaching than he thought his friends needed. "The hand of God" is an enormous subject. What Job knew about God's hand he would not hide, but there was much indeed he did not know, as we all must recognise in our ignorance.
- Portion given. Both halves of the verse hand something over: a share and an inheritance. The Giver is God Himself.
- Portion misapplied. Zophar had already used these words as a weapon. The teaching was mostly true; the charge against Job was false.
- Portion reclaimed. Job repeats his friends' description of the wicked. No honest listener could place him in that group.
- Portion contrasted. He watches the wealth and houses of the wicked crumble without alarm. He counts on a lasting possession of his own.
- Portion still unfinished. Job offers to teach others about God's hand, and still needs teaching himself. The subject is larger than anyone who handles it.
If his children be multiplied, it is for the sword, and his offspring shall not be satisfied with bread;
In his last long speech, Job takes up his friends' favourite subject — the fate of the wicked — and presses it further than they ever did. Verse 14 starts that picture: the godless man's family may grow, but the growth ends in the sword and in hunger.
The friends have run out of arguments, and Job now speaks without interruption.
In Job 27 he takes up another subject. It is not the glory of God, but the misery of the hypocrite and his terrible doom. He paints it in stronger colours than they had. Yet he still holds firmly to his own integrity, even though God had not yet cleared him, and they had been unjust.
Job must spell the case out, because the friends had failed to do it.
In the later part of the chapter Job sets out a case with great force. They had it before their eyes just as much as he did, yet he must spell it out for them, since they had failed to lay it before him. It is the end of the godless — a subject he would have avoided if his conscience were not clear. They had toyed with the matter to no purpose. He would teach them about God's hand, and keep back nothing of what is with the Almighty. However many children the godless man has, the sword and hunger come for them. They fall unburied, and even those nearest to them do not mourn.
Verse 13 names the portion a wicked man receives "with God." Verse 14 begins to spell out what that portion holds.
"This is the portion of a wicked man with God." He has received wealth and pleasure and honour from people. But what a different inheritance they will get from the Almighty, whom they have despised. Have his children multiplied? They are left to the devouring sword. Did they once live in luxury? They will come to lack bread. Death swallows up those who outlive them, and no friend mourns for them — "Their priests fell by the sword, and their widows made no lamentation" (Ps. 78:64).
Job does not deny that the wicked man's family may grow. He aims the point straight back at the friends whose reasoning it overturns.
And even if they go on and have their children multiplied, it will only be deeper sorrow in the end. "If his children are multiplied, it is for the sword, and his descendants have not enough bread," no matter what he may be taking for himself (and so on to the end of verse 19). All this is completely opposed to their reasoning, and in this way Job triumphs over them.
Job had lost all his children in one disaster. So when he describes the wicked man's children cut down, he sounds like he is describing himself.
Job now declares the eventual doom of the wicked in language like that of his friends. But unlike them, he sets it against his own eventual end. They had spoken this way to mark Job out as wicked. His account of the wicked and their end actually shows that he cannot be one of them. Job's experience does look like the wicked man's, as in verse 14... Job's children had all died in a sudden disaster (ch. 1:18-19), but Job is looking beyond the present, to the eventual end of the wicked. His thoughts are surely inconsistent, since he had dwelt so much on his own present circumstances that he could hardly see further.
Commentators differ here. Ridout reads the same lines as a sign of quiet confidence.
So Job dwells on a sorrow in some ways like his own, and yet how different. He too had lost his children, but was it under the punishing wrath of God?... Job can speak like this about the perishing things of this world's greatness. That shows he knew a far different heritage was his. Let moth and rust destroy what they will — he seems to say that he knows he has a better and more lasting wealth.
- Portion. What the wicked man gathers comes from human hands; what he finally receives comes from the Almighty he has despised.
- Multiplied. A growing family looks like safety, yet the verse hands that growth over to the sword and to hunger.
- Emptied. The survivors lack bread, fall unburied, and no one mourns for them.
- Conscience. He could only raise this subject because his own conscience was clear; a guilty man avoids the topic.
- Heritage. Job lost his children too, yet he calls this world's greatness perishable because he counts on something better and lasting.
Those that remain of him shall be buried by death, and his widows shall not weep.
Job's friends had kept describing the end of a wicked man, and kept aiming that description at him. Here Job takes up the same description himself, and it ends at a funeral where no one weeps.
One writer explains this change of tone:
Here we reach the explanation of the apparent change in Job's attitude. Until now he had withstood the friends in their argument about the wicked, because they always linked him with their descriptions. He will now take up the same language to show how impossible it was to confuse a man like himself with the wicked they identified him with. It becomes in this way a most powerful reply to their charges.
Job calls all of this the portion of a wicked man with God. One writer traces how that portion works through the whole family:
"This is the portion of the wicked man with God." He has received wealth and pleasure and honour from people. But how different is the heritage they will get from the Almighty whom they have despised! Have his children multiplied? They are left to the devouring sword. Did they once live in luxury? They will come to lack bread. Those who survive them will be swallowed up by death, with no friendly mourning — "Their priests fell by the sword, and their widows made no lamentation" (Ps. 78:64).
The verse looks past the children already cut down to those left over. Their advantage is only a delay.
"Those who survive him shall be buried in death, and their widows shall not weep." Some may have a little longer, but the grave will soon claim them. Their widows would not even weep, because they would feel no loss in the death of an evil husband.
Commentators differ on the picture here. Grant sees the grave closing in fast. Another writer describes these deaths the other way — no burial at all, and no mourning even from the nearest relatives:
He would teach them about God's hand, and not hold back what is with the Almighty. However many children he has, the sword and hunger come for them. They fall, unburied and unwept even by those nearest to them.
Grant quotes the older wording, "buried in death." The ESV translates the same line with the pestilence doing the burying.
This is the part that hurts to read, because Job himself had lost all his children. One writer notes that the chapter he is speaking, if it fitted him, would have been the last subject he'd choose:
It is the end of the godless, a theme he would have avoided if his conscience were not good.
Job's loss looked like the loss he is describing. The difference is not in the size of the grief but in what stands behind it — and in what Job knows he still has.
Job dwells here on a sorrow in some respects like his own, and yet how different. He too had been stripped of his children, but was it under the punishing wrath of God? And did Job act like these wicked men he describes here? They may gather silver and wealth like dust, only to have the righteous enjoy it — "The wealth of the sinner is laid up for the just." Was Job's case like that? ... Job can speak this way about the perishing things of this world's greatness. That shows he was conscious of a far different heritage for himself.
- Portion. It all hangs on one word. This is the portion a wicked man gets from God, not from men. Wealth and honour came from people; this heritage comes from the Almighty he despised.
- Children. The heritage reaches his sons first: however many they are, the sword and hunger take them.
- Survivors. Then it reaches the survivors. Their extra time is only a delay before the grave claims them.
- Tears. The heritage reaches the funeral itself. One writer says the widows do not weep because they feel no loss in such a husband's death. Another reads the line as death unburied and unmourned even by the nearest relatives, like the widows of Psalm 78 who made no lamentation.
- Contrast. Job can describe all this because his own loss was not this heritage. He knows a far different one is his.
Though he heap up silver as the dust, and prepare clothing as the clay;
Job is still answering his friends, and here he describes what becomes of a wicked man's hoard of silver and clothing. So who ends up owning what a man spends his life collecting?
Job chose to talk about the end of the godless man. He could only touch that theme because his conscience was clear.
In the latter part of the chapter Job speaks with great force about a case they had in front of their eyes just as much as he did. But he has to explain it for them, since they had completely failed to set it before him. It is the end of the godless, a theme he would have avoided if his conscience were not good. They had trifled with the matter. He would teach them about God's hand, and not hold back what is with the Almighty... His treasures go to strangers who are worthy.
Silver can be stacked as high as a dust heap. It still cannot steady a man when the storm comes.
What cannot quiet the heart in a storm cannot entitle a man to blessedness. Piles of earthly goods cannot calm a troubled heart, so they cannot make anyone blessed. When Saul was in deep distress, could all the jewels of his crown comfort him? "They cast their silver into the streets… their silver and gold are not able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the LORD" (Ezek. 7:19).
One writer ties this heap to the rich man in Jesus' parable. He laid up goods for many years and got one night.
He may heap up an abundance of riches, like the rich man of Luke 12:16-21. That man said to himself, "Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry." But God said to him, "Fool! This night your soul is required of you, and the things you have prepared, whose will they be?" So one may pile up riches, but others, less foolish than he, will reap the benefit. The absolute folly of mankind is certainly clear in all this… What is 100 years compared to eternity?
There is another side to this. What the wicked man stores up does not vanish — God keeps it for the just.
A good man resembles Him who found him evil and by grace made him a partaker of a divine nature, escaping the corruption that is in the world through lust. Blessed of God, he leaves an inheritance — if not of gold and silver, then something better still, lasting to his children's children. The wealth of the sinner, great as it may seem, is laid up for the just. Ungodliness may prepare, plan, and pass it on; but God cares for those who serve Him. So the just shall put on the clothing meant for others, and the innocent shall divide the silver if He sees fit.
Job had lost his children and his goods too. So how was his case different from the one he describes?
Job dwells here on a sorrow in some ways like his own, and yet how different. He too had lost his children, but was it under the punishing wrath of God? And did Job act like these wicked men he describes here? They may gather silver and wealth like dust, only to have the righteous enjoy it — "the sinner's wealth is laid up for the righteous."… Job can speak this way about the perishing things of this world's greatness. That shows he was conscious of a far different heritage for himself. Let moth and rust destroy — he seems to say that he knows he has a better and lasting possession.
So which riches does a man keep? One writer says they are the ones he gives away.
Riches before God cannot exist without what men short-sightedly call impoverishing yourself. It means using what we have not for ourselves, but for others. Only such people are rich toward God, whether their means are great or small. If their means are small, they are still large enough to let them think of others in love and provide for needs greater than their own. If their means are great, their responsibilities are that much greater.
- Heaped. Job's subject is the end of the godless man, and he handles it openly because his own conscience is clear.
- Worthless. Silver gathered like dust cannot quiet a troubled heart or deliver anyone in the day of wrath.
- Handed on. He prepares the clothing and the silver. One night ends his plan, and others reap the benefit.
- Inherited. The heir is not random. God cares for those who serve Him, so the sinner's wealth is laid up for the righteous.
- Enduring. Job could watch all this because his heritage lay elsewhere. The wealth that lasts is what a man spends on others, which alone makes him rich toward God.
He may prepare it, but the just shall put it on; and the innocent shall divide the silver.
Job is still answering the friends who accused him, and near the end of his speech he turns to the fate of the wicked man. It raises the question the friends never settled: if God repays the wicked, why did Job lose everything?
The friends had described the ruin of the wicked to place Job among them. One writer notes that Job describes it too, and that the picture itself clears him.
Job now goes on to declare the eventual doom of the wicked, in language like that of his friends. But unlike his friends, he showed this in contrast to his own eventual end. They had spoken this way to identify Job as being wicked. But his summary of the wicked and their end shows that Job cannot be one of them.
Job can take up this theme because nothing inside accused him. He says he will hold back nothing of what he knows about God's hand.
It is the end of the godless, a theme he would have avoided if his conscience were not good. They had treated the matter lightly and got nowhere. He would teach them about God's hand, and keep back nothing of what is with the Almighty… His treasures go to strangers who are worthy.
One writer sets this reversal beside the inheritance a good man leaves behind. What looks like a chance change of owner, he calls God's care for His own.
God blesses the good man, and he leaves an inheritance to his children's children — if not of gold and silver, then something better and lasting. The wealth of the sinner, great as it may seem, is laid up for the just. Ungodliness may prepare, plan, and lock up an inheritance for its heirs; but God cares for those who serve Him. So the just will put on the clothing meant for others, and the innocent will divide the silver if He sees fit.
Note the closing words — "if He sees fit." Kelly leaves the outcome in God's hands rather than turning it into a rule.
The man is busy preparing, and never asks who will enjoy it. One writer ties him to the rich man in Luke 12, who planned for many years and got one night.
He may heap up great riches. He is like the rich man of Luke 12:16-21, who said to himself, "Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry." But God said to him, "Fool! This night your soul is required of you, and the things you have prepared, whose will they be?" So one may pile up riches, but others, less foolish than he, will reap its benefit. The folly of mankind is plain in all this. We all know that our lives are very short at best. What is a hundred years compared to eternity?
Job had lost everything, so this description comes close to his own life. Yet the differences prove his point, and the way he speaks of wealth shows where his confidence lay.
They may gather silver and wealth as the dust, only to have the righteous enjoy it — "the sinner's wealth is laid up for the righteous." Was Job's case like this? Had the righteous obtained the wealth that once was his?… Job can speak like this about the perishing things of this world's greatness. That shows he was conscious of a far different heritage for himself. Let moth and rust destroy — he seems to say that he knows he has a better and more lasting possession.
Dishonest gain runs the same course. One writer names who ends up with it.
Man may use his wits to take dishonest advantage of another, legal as it may be. He may lend money at high interest, or use other means that are not fully honest. But in the end he will lose it, whether before or at death. Then another may use it in compassion toward the poor. At least God will pity the poor, and greed will have its just recompense.
- Prepares. All the wicked man does in this verse is prepare. He piles up silver and clothing. The effort is real; the ownership is temporary.
- Loses. He loses it "whether before or at death." The rich man with full barns got one night: goods prepared, and the question left hanging — whose will they be?
- Passes. Others wear what he prepared and divide his silver. Kelly reads this as God's care for those who serve Him, not blind chance — with the guard "if He sees fit."
- Contrasts. Job's loss was not this. He can speak of perishing wealth without fear, because he counted on a better and more lasting possession.
- Redirects. Money squeezed out of others ends up in hands that pity the poor. Greed does not just fail; it funds the opposite of itself.
He buildeth his house as the moth, and as a booth that a keeper maketh.
Job turns his friends' argument back on them and describes the end of the godless man. Verse 18 asks what such a man builds, and the answer is a moth's shell and a hut a watchman leaves behind.
This is not Job's own life under review. One commentator reads the close of the chapter as a lesson Job gives his friends. He could raise the subject only because his conscience was clear. He traces the godless man's losses down to the house he built.
In the latter part of the chapter Job speaks with great force about a case they had before their eyes just as much as he did. He has to explain it for them, since they had completely failed to set it before him. It is the end of the godless — a theme he would have avoided if his conscience were not good. … His children, however many, meet the sword and hunger. His treasures go to strangers who deserve them. The house he built turns out as frail as a moth, like a shed the watchman puts up by the roadside.
The image pairs two flimsy shelters. One is the frail dwelling of a moth. The other is a hut the watchman puts up for a season and then leaves. Nobody expects either to last.
The grand houses of the ungodly are like the frail dwelling of the moth. They will crumble into nothing. Or they will be like the watchman's passing booth, "like a lodge in a cucumber field."
A Bible dictionary defines that kind of booth:
A temporary booth or lodge, without stability.
The picture does not stop at the house. The next verses follow the man to bed.
He follows in his solemn description the course of the wicked to the end. The rich man lies down without realising it is for the last time. He lies down in his usual comfort. He opens his eyes on a new day, but not to take up the old work and pleasures again. He opens his eyes only to pass away. For so long his eyes had shut out everything God has testified. At last they open on another world — "and in Hades, being in torment, he lifted up his eyes."
Another writer notes that Job stops short of the detail the Lord Jesus later gave:
So the rich unbeliever lies down. Then he opens his eyes to find himself in torment. Terrors overtake him like a flood, and the tempest of God's judgment carries him away (vv.19-20). This is graphic language. But Job is not as specific as the Lord Jesus was in Luke 16:23, about the rich man who died.
His friends had been hinting that this description fit Job himself. He answers with an oath, and sends the charge straight back.
He still holds that all their imagining was false. He now says more solemnly than ever — it was a kind of oath — as God lives, this is true. "Far be it from me to say that you are right." Now he turns on them; he says, 'You are the guilty ones, not I.'
Job had lost his own children and his own wealth. So why can he describe crumbling houses without fear?
Job dwells here on a sorrow in some ways like his own, and yet how different. He too had lost his children — but was that under the punishing wrath of God? … Job can speak this way about the perishing things of this world's greatness. That shows he was conscious of a very different heritage for himself. Let moth and rust destroy — he seems to say that he knows he has a better and more enduring substance.
- Builds. The godless man does build — but only a moth's shell and a watchman's hut, shelters with no stability.
- Sleeps. He lies down in his usual comfort, not realising it is the last time.
- Wakes. He opens his eyes, not to the old pleasures, but on another world — the language points toward the rich man in Luke 16:23.
- Speaks. Job can raise the subject only because his conscience is clear. He turns the charge back: his accusers are the guilty ones.
- Holds. Job can watch the grandest houses crumble without fear. He knows he has a better and more enduring substance.
He lieth down rich, but will do so no more; he openeth his eyes, and he is not.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Terrors overtake him like waters; a whirlwind stealeth him away in the night.
Job is describing the death of the godless man — the one who seems untouchable until the moment God moves. Two questions follow. Why is Job, of all people, painting this scene? And whose end is it?
Job's friends had already tried to describe the fate of the wicked and had used it against him. Job now takes up the same subject himself. One writer notes that a guilty man would have avoided it:
Later in the chapter Job speaks with great force about a case they could see just as well as he could. But he had to explain it for them, because they had completely failed to set it out for him. It is the end of the godless, a theme he would have avoided if his conscience were not good. They had dealt with the matter lightly and to no purpose. He would teach them about God's hand, and not hold back what is with the Almighty.
So his description of the wicked becomes his own defence:
He keeps defending himself as he pictures the godless and contrasts them with himself. He shows that no one can count him among them. How could anyone ever apply this description of the godless to him? True, he had suffered as the wicked suffer, but will his end be like theirs? So he tries to show them that they had done him an injustice. He was an upright man who held on to God despite his misery.
The terrors do not arrive without warning. They arrive after a lifetime of warnings ignored:
Terror, so long kept at a distance as the warning voice of conscience spoke, now sweeps down upon him; as by a tempest in the night he is carried away. God brings him down, and men rejoice at the removal of their oppressor.
The force of the verse lies in its speed. There is no gap in which to prepare:
He lies down rich, and wakes up to his ruin before God. His destruction is as sudden as it is overwhelming. Terrors overtake him like waters. A whirlwind by night snatches him up and whirls him away, despite his pitiful efforts to escape, as if it mocked his misery and the place that once knew him.
The previous verse has the same man lying down rich. He closes his eyes on the world he knew and opens them somewhere else:
The rich man lies down not realising it is for the last time. He lies down in his usual comfort. He opens his eyes on a new day, but not to take up his old work and pleasures. He opens his eyes only to pass away. Those eyes, so long closed to all that God has witnessed, at last open to another world.
One writer names the storm as God's judgment, and notes that the Lord Jesus later spoke more plainly about the same end:
So the rich unbeliever lies down. Then he opens his eyes to find himself in torment. Terrors overtake him as a flood, and the tempest of God's judgment takes him away (vv.19-20). This is vivid language. But Job is not as exact as the Lord Jesus was in Luke 16:23, about the rich man who died: "and being in Hades, lifted up his eyes." So after death there is torment for the wicked.
Job can look calmly at this scene because he is sure it is not his own. The very fact that he can call worldly greatness frail shows where his hope was fixed:
The grand dwellings of the ungodly, like the frail house of the moth, will crumble into nothing, or be like the watchman's temporary shelter, "as a lodge in a garden of cucumbers." The fact that Job can speak in this way of the perishing things of this world's greatness shows that he was conscious of a far different heritage for himself. Let moth and rust corrupt — he seems to say that he knows he has a better and more lasting substance.
One writer asks what made the difference between Job and the man in the storm:
So Job calmly describes an end which he knows is not his. What has made the difference? Is it not the faith which in the middle of all his distress has held fast to God? — a God whom he so little knew, and at whose afflictions he had complained.
- Warned — conscience spoke for years and held the terror off. The flood is not the first notice a man gets.
- Sudden — he lies down rich and wakes to ruin before God. Rising water and a night storm leave no room to escape.
- Judgment — the storm is not bad luck. One writer calls the night tempest God's own judgment.
- Beyond — he opens his eyes on another world. The Lord Jesus later described it more plainly than Job does here.
- Contrast — Job can describe this end because he knows it is not his own. The difference is a faith that held fast to God.
The east wind carrieth him away and he is gone; and as a storm it hurleth him out of his place.
Job is nearing the end of his long defence. He turns the tables on his three friends and describes the doom of the godless man himself. It comes as a storm that lifts a man off his feet and carries him away. The picture raises two questions: what does the east wind stand for, and why does Job of all people dwell on a fate like this?
His friends had charged him unjustly. Job answers by painting the hypocrite's end more strongly than they ever managed, and he still refuses to admit their charge.
In Job 27 he takes up another subject. It is not the glory of God, but the misery of the hypocrite and his terrible doom. He paints it in stronger colours than his friends had used. Yet he still holds firmly to his integrity, though God had not yet cleared his name, and they had been unjust.
Notice who is teaching whom here, and what that says about Job's conscience.
Later in the chapter Job dwells with great force on a case his friends had in front of their eyes as much as he did. He has to explain it for them, because they had completely failed to set it before him. It is the end of the godless — a theme he would have avoided if his conscience were not good.
The east wind was not simply bad weather to people in that part of the world. It ruined crops and wrecked ships. Scripture uses it again and again as a picture of God's judgment.
The east wind was harsh and destructive to plants (Genesis 41:6, 23, 27). It was dangerous to ships at sea (Psalm 48:7; Ezekiel 27:26). It is a symbol of the withering power of God's judgements (Hosea 13:15).
One writer, quoting an older translation, traces this storm past death itself and finds no escape from it.
"The east wind carries him away" (v.21). The east wind is often spoken of in Scripture as signifying God's judgment (Ex. 14:21). That judgment is slow to arise, but when it comes, it "does not spare" (v.22). Men may try to flee desperately from its power, as they do from hurricanes, but to no avail. So after death there is torment for the wicked.
The verse says the wind sweeps the man out of his place. He had built his life on his house, his standing, and the spot where people knew him. All of it is gone, and gone fast.
He lies down rich, and wakes to his ruin before God. His destruction is as sudden as it is overwhelming. Terrors overtake him like waters. A whirlwind in the night snatches him up and whirls him away, despite his pitiful efforts to escape, as if it really mocked his misery and the place that once knew him.
The terror here is not news to the man. Conscience had been warning him, and he had held its voice off for a long time.
Terror had long been kept at a distance while the warning voice of conscience spoke. Now it sweeps down on him. A storm in the night carries him away. God brings him down, and men are glad their oppressor is gone.
Job has been stripped of everything. Yet he speaks of this ruin as something that belongs to somebody else.
So Job calmly describes an end which he knows is not his. What has made the difference? Is it not the faith which, in the middle of all his distress, has held fast to God? — a God whom he so little knew, and at whose afflictions he had complained.
One writer presses what the friends owed Job once they saw this.
Clearly Job had no fear at all of sharing a judgment like this. His friends should have seen that these things were not true of him. It would have been wise for them to apologise openly to Job for their cruel charges against him.
- Wind. The east wind withered crops and sank ships. Scripture makes it the picture of God's judgment. So this is God acting, not bad luck.
- Delay. That judgment is slow to arise, and meanwhile the man keeps the warning voice of conscience at a distance.
- Suddenness. When it comes, he lies down rich and wakes to ruin. The storm snatches him up and sweeps him from the place that once knew him.
- No escape. Men try desperately to flee its power, as they do a hurricane, and it does not spare.
- Contrast. Job describes this end calmly because he knows it is not his. The difference is a faith that held fast to God while he lost everything else.
And [God] shall cast upon him and not spare he would fain flee out of his hand.
Job is finishing a long speech, and no one is left to answer him. In verse 22 he pictures the end of a godless man: something strikes without pity, and the man runs for his life.
Job's friends had accused him of wickedness. Now he takes up the end of the wicked himself.
They had proved themselves unable to apply the case justly. So he would let them know the sure end of ungodliness. Troubles come, outside and inside, for his children as for himself, until every trace of dishonest gain is gone. Then death opens the unavoidable doom of this man. Men, if not the wind itself, hissed him out of his place, delighting in his destruction.
The "it" that hurls at the man is the east wind of verse 21. That wind carries a settled meaning in Scripture.
"The east wind carries him away" (v.21). The east wind is often spoken of in Scripture as a picture of God's judgment (Ex. 14:21). That judgment is slow to arise, but when it comes, it "does not spare" (v.22). Men may try desperately to flee from its power, as they do from hurricanes, but with no success.
Grant also traces where the tempest takes the man.
The rich unbeliever lies down, then opens his eyes to find himself in torment. Terrors overtake him like a flood, and the tempest of God's judgment takes him away (vv.19-20). So after death there is torment for the wicked.
Kelly's own translation gives both halves of the verse: the blow that spares nothing, and the man's wish to get out of its hand.
Terrors overtake him like waters. By night a tempest steals him away. An east wind takes him up, and he is gone. It sweeps him out of his place. It hurls at him and does not spare. He would gladly flee from its hand. It claps its hands at him, and hisses him out of his place.
Kelly adds how sudden the ruin is, and how the storm treats the man's efforts to escape.
His destruction is as sudden as it is overwhelming. A whirlwind by night snatches him up and whirls him away, despite pitiful efforts to escape, as if it mocked his misery and the place that once knew him.
The blow is sudden, but the man was not unwarned.
Terror stayed at a distance for a long time while the warning voice of conscience spoke. Now it sweeps down on him. A tempest in the night carries him away. God brings him down, and men rejoice that their oppressor is gone.
Kelly sets the man's unheard cry beside the way he lived.
He was at least as sure as they were that the hope of the hypocrite or the profane man must perish when God summons his soul. God does not hear his cry when the long-deferred trouble falls on him. In the same way, he neither delights in God at any time, nor calls on Him at all times.
The verse does not name who hurls at the man. Kelly's translation makes it the wind, while some versions supply God as the one who casts. Writing on a later chapter, Ridout holds both together.
The east looks like the source of the light. From the east comes also the sweeping east wind, spread over the land in the storm. It is a picture of wrath — the wrath of the same God who in the light had spoken so quietly. But He holds even the east wind in His fists, and controls it by His will.
Job expects no such end for himself. One thing makes the difference.
So Job calmly describes an end which he knows is not his. What has made the difference? Is it not the faith which, in all his distress, has held fast to God? — a God whom he knew so little, and at whose afflictions he had complained.
Grant draws the practical conclusion for the friends who were listening.
Clearly Job had no fear at all of sharing a judgment like this. His friends ought to have easily recognised that these things would not be true of him. It would have been wise for them to apologise frankly to Job for their cruel charges against him.
- Wind — the force that hurls at the man is the east wind of verse 21. Scripture uses it as a picture of God's judgment, and God holds it in His hand.
- Delay — that judgment is slow to arise. Conscience warns for years, then the tempest comes in a single night.
- Pitiless — when it comes it spares nothing. He lies down and opens his eyes in torment, and his flight from its hand shows how little his strength is worth.
- Mockery — the storm claps its hands and hisses him out of the place that once knew him. It treats his struggle with contempt.
- Difference — Job describes this end calmly because he knows it is not his. Faith that held fast to God in the dark is what separates him.
[Men] shall clap their hands at him, and shall hiss him out of his place.
Job's long speech about the doom of the wicked ends here. A man is swept away by God's judgment, and no one mourns him — there is only applause and jeering. Two questions follow: who claps and hisses, and why Job of all people was painting a ruin so much like his own.
The verse is not about the death itself but about what follows it, in public. One writer, quoting an older translation in which people do the clapping, reads the gesture as the neighbours' verdict on a life:
"Men shall clap their hands at him, and shall hiss him out of his place" (v.23). Rather than sorrowing at his disgraceful death, those who have known him will be glad he is gone.
The Hebrew leaves the subject open, and commentators differ. The ESV keeps the storm as the actor — "It claps its hands at him and hisses at him from its place" — and one careful translation of the chapter follows the same line, making the wind itself the mocker that drives the man out:
An east wind takes him up, and he is gone, and it sweeps him out of his place; and it casts at him, and spares not; from its hand he would gladly flee. It claps its hands at him, and hisses him out of his place.
The same writer allows both readings when he summarises Job's argument, and the force is the same either way — creation and neighbours agree in scorning the man God has removed:
death opened the doom he could not escape — the man whom men, if not the wind itself, hissed out of his place, celebrating his destruction.
The clapping belongs to a storm, and the storm is not really weather:
"The east wind carries him away" (v.21). Scripture often uses the east wind as a sign of God's judgment (Ex. 14:21). That judgment is slow to arise, but when it comes, it "does not spare" (v.22). Men may try in desperation to flee its power, as they do from hurricanes, but it is no use.
So the jeering does not bring the man down. God's judgment does that, and the scorn only follows him out.
Job had known deep distress himself. Yet he describes this ruin from the outside, as a watcher and not a candidate:
So Job calmly describes an end he knows is not his own. What has made the difference? Is it not the faith that has held fast to God through all his distress? — a God he knew so little, and whose afflictions he had complained about.
His friends should have drawn the same conclusion from the speech they had just heard:
Clearly Job had no fear at all of sharing a judgment like this. His friends should have seen at once that these things would not be true of Job. It would have been wise for them to offer Job an open apology for their cruel charges against him.
Job's friends had charged him with being a hypocrite. He now paints the hypocrite's ruin in darker colours than they had, and turns their own weapon around:
In the rest of the chapter we find Job enlarging upon the way God deals in judgment with the hypocrite. He had just about charged his friends with being hypocrites in their accusations against him. So his words appear to be a warning to them that this might be their own fate, something like what had happened to him.
Job is right that the end he describes is not his own. But holding fast his righteousness is not the same as being cleared by God:
This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, had to do with his outward conduct. God's searching light had not yet entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We know he was not either. But outward correctness does not in itself count as righteousness before God.
- Wind. The clapping and hissing close a storm. The east wind that carries the man off pictures God's judgment: slow to come, sparing nothing when it does.
- Scorn. The last thing the wicked man receives is not mourning but applause at his removal; the world is glad he is gone.
- Speaker. Commentators differ over who does the hissing — men, or the wind itself. Either way the man is driven out of his place with contempt.
- Contrast. Job paints this end knowing it is not his own. His friends should have seen that his sufferings did not fit the picture.
- Limit. Job's clean record answered his accusers. Yet outward correctness is not righteousness before God, and that reckoning was still ahead of him.
Surely there is a vein for the silver, and a place for gold which they refine;
Job breaks off his argument with his friends and pictures men sinking shafts deep into the earth for silver and gold. The scene admires human skill, yet it opens a chapter with a question that skill cannot answer: where is wisdom found?
Commentators note how abruptly this chapter arrives, and where Job's eye now rests.
Now in the next chapter (Job 28) we have a very remarkable addition — one of the most striking in the book of Job. It seems very abrupt. He now turns away from man altogether in his bad ways, and from defending those who really looked to God. He looks at the general state of mankind. Not any particularly evil class or righteous class.
The link with the chapter before is the subject of riches.
Job speaks on. He now contrasts the doom of the ungodly rich, described in the chapter before, with the true riches, which can never be lost... The opening part of the chapter describes the toil and care with which men search for the "delved gold"... This chapter would prove that Job could not be the hypocrite his friends would make him out to be.
The two halves of the line do not say the same thing twice. (Kelly quotes an older translation, which reads "vein for the silver," and "brass" where newer ones read "copper.")
"Surely there is a vein for the silver and a place for gold where they find it." Men do not find gold in veins as they find silver. Gold comes in quite a different way — often as dust, and sometimes as nuggets. But silver runs in large and rich veins. "Iron is taken out of the earth, and brass is molten out of the stone." That is exactly where men find copper. Where we read "brass" it is very often "copper" — chiefly so in the Bible.
What follows in the chapter reads like a report from inside a working mine, and the speaker clearly knows the trade.
He speaks first of the treasures of the earth, the riches which man seeks after, but which do not last, and are so often man's undoing. Job shows that he had a good knowledge of mining operations. He knows of veins of silver and how gold is refined... Then he describes how the miner with his mining lamp makes an end to the darkness when he digs into the mountains and then he sinks a shaft... All this man does, risking life and comfort, to get gold and the treasures of the earth.
What men will spend on this search says something about the heart.
It is wealth, gold, jewels, glory, that man seeks after, and for which he is ready to barter his very life and soul... Of course, this does not mean that these precious things are sinful in themselves. Nor does it deny that we need their proper use. But the restless craving for them shows the poverty of man's heart, seeking what can never satisfy.
There is a mine for silver, the "current money with the merchant." How much labour goes into that shining white metal! In the East people use it widely as money. Sadly, of what it pictures — the redemption-price for the soul of man (Ex. 30:11-16; Ex. 38:25-28) — men know little and care less... Men also refine gold in the fire and make it into beautiful ornaments and the king's crown. They will travel to the ends of the earth for it. Most treat the true gold — the righteousness of God in Christ — as worthless.
The verse begins a list of what man can do. What does all that skill gain him?
"He binds the floods from overflowing; and the thing that is hidden he brings forth to light. But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich. There is what will bring money and perhaps standing. But where shall wisdom be found?
Time has only widened the gap between what people can find and what they still lack.
Men may discover much. Since Job's day they have discovered vastly more. But wisdom still escapes them. Suppose Job could have seen what men do and discover in our atomic age. He would say the same, only a hundred times more strongly.
- Turn — Job stops arguing about particular men and looks at mankind as a whole. He sets the lost wealth of the ungodly against riches that cannot be lost.
- Detail — The verse is exact. Silver runs in rich veins; gold comes as dust and nuggets. The "brass" of the next line is often copper.
- Cost — Men will trade life itself for these treasures. The craving, not the metal, exposes a heart chasing what can never satisfy.
- Picture — Silver pictures the redemption-price for the soul. Gold pictures the righteousness of God in Christ. Men value both least.
- Failure — Every shaft sunk still leaves the chapter's question open. Modern discovery has only widened the gap.
Iron is taken out of the dust, and copper is molten out of the stone.
Job pauses his long speech to describe men digging metal out of the ground. He builds a picture of human skill, then asks the one question skill cannot answer: where is wisdom found?
The ESV says copper; older translations say "brass." One commentator explains the difference, and says the verse names exactly where copper is found:
"Iron is taken out of the earth, and brass is molten out of the stone." That is just exactly where copper is found. Where we read "brass" it is very often "copper" — and that is mostly the case in the Bible. He now gives us a remarkable sketch of mining in very early times.
Job writes like a man who has watched the work done, and who knows what it costs:
He speaks first of the treasures of the earth — the riches man goes after. They do not last, and they are so often man's undoing. Job shows that he had a good knowledge of mining operations. He knows of veins of silver and how gold is refined. Iron is taken out of the earth and copper molten out of stone. Then he describes the miner with his lamp. He puts an end to the darkness as he digs into the mountains and sinks a shaft. He also mentions the dangers of mining — "they hang (suspended by ropes) far from men, they swing to and fro." All this man does, risking life and comfort, to get gold and the treasures of the earth.
Some writers read these metals as pictures, and they differ in what they draw out. One sees God's own hand in placing them where men can find them:
God has seen fit to put these metals in places where men can find them without difficulty, and men certainly make much use of them. Yet they know little of the spiritual truths these metals stand for. Gold speaks of the glory of God. Silver speaks of the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. Iron speaks of the strength of the kingdom of God. Copper speaks of the holiness of God.
Another writer sets what men will work for against what they ignore:
Iron, needed in every kind of work, takes hard labour to draw out of the dust of the earth. Man labours for these earthly necessities, but forgets Him in whom alone is strength. Brass, or copper, with its unyielding strength, was and still is melted out of the stone that holds it. But men place little value on the unchanging judgments of God.
Human skill is real and wide-ranging. It still falls short of what Job is looking for:
This is a very remarkable chapter. It follows man's skill as he does all sorts of things — metalwork, engineering, holding back the floods, and bringing hidden things out of the earth. His skill is unlimited, in a way, over what is under his control — but this is not wisdom... God arranged all these things. So far as creation goes — that is, where man lives — He had wisdom about the things that occupy man. But He put man in relationship with Himself, that is more. Truly recognising this, and the exercise of conscience that follows — that is wisdom for man.
Time has only widened the gap:
Men may discover much, and since Job's day they have discovered far more, but wisdom still eludes them. If Job could see what men do and discover in our atomic age, he would say the same, only a hundred times more strongly.
One writer names what drives all this daring:
Man's daring resources, with covetousness behind, conquer all difficulties. The hard flint gives way to his hand. He overturns mountains by the root if they stand in his way, and cuts rivers through the rocks, to reach the precious things his eye sees.
- Dug. Job describes real mining — iron from the ground, copper melted out of stone — like a man who knew the shafts, the lamps and the ropes.
- Driven. The skill is genuine, but a covetous heart lies behind it; men overturn mountains to reach what their eye values.
- Deeper. The metals men handle every day carry meanings they miss. Writers see glory, redemption, strength and holiness in ore that men value only by weight.
- Deficient. Skill over everything under man's hand is still not wisdom. Every advance since Job's day only sharpens the point.
- Dependent. God put man in relationship with Himself. Recognising that, and letting conscience act on it, is wisdom no mine can yield.
[Man] putteth an end to the darkness, and exploreth to the utmost limit, the stones of darkness and of the shadow of death.
Job pauses his argument to describe something men do well. They go down into the dark places of the earth and drag out its treasure. The picture admires their skill. But it sets up the question of the chapter: if men can conquer the darkness underground, why can they not find wisdom?
The verse sits inside a description of early mining. One commentator walks through what the miners were after and how they reached it.
Gold is not found in veins like silver. It is found in quite a different way — very often in the form of dust, and sometimes of nuggets. But silver lies in large and rich veins... "He sets an end to darkness." He now gives us a remarkable sketch of mining in very early times. "He sets an end to darkness, and searches out all perfection" — searching for these precious metals, gold, silver or the like — "the stones of darkness, and the shadow of death." That is, he goes down to the depths of the earth after them.
These writers quote an older English translation, which has "searches out all perfection" where the ESV has "searches out to the farthest limit." One of them explains the phrase. He also names what the search costs the man who makes it.
In his search after these treasures, man digs into the dark hollows of the earth with his lamp. He makes an end to the darkness as he goes into the farthest extremities (rather than "perfection") of the mines. He is searching for those ore-laden "stones of darkness" — stones hidden in the darkness. The depths of the earth are like the shadow of death, and often bury the tough miner in them, but nothing holds him back. Men will give their lives for gold.
Something has to be strong enough to send a man into a pit that could become his grave. One commentator names what lies behind the daring.
He knows how to make his way despite the darkness, overcoming it with artificial light, no matter what the danger — a danger learnt every now and then at the cost of a life... Man's daring resources, with covetousness behind, conquer all difficulties. The hard flint gives way to his hand, and he overturns mountains by the root if they stand in his way.
Job's point is not that mining is wrong. It is that all this digging never turns up the one thing worth having. Later discovery has not changed that.
They dig down. They divert the underground stream. They make paths where the strongest beasts and the sharpest-eyed birds have never been. But in all this searching they never find wisdom... Men may discover much. Since Job's day they have discovered an immense deal more. But wisdom eludes them.
The same commentator asks what all this effort actually produces.
"He holds back the floods from overflowing, and brings what is hidden out into the light. But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich. There is what will bring money and perhaps standing. But where shall wisdom be found?
If wisdom is not in the deepest shaft, it must have another source.
What a very solemn thing that is! True wisdom and true understanding not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ — and Christ had not yet come. This came out even more clearly in Christ's rejection and death.
The chapter ends with God's own answer to the question.
"To man He said, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to depart from evil is understanding" (v.28). The only reason that wisdom eludes people is this: "there is no fear of God before their eyes." So they have no heart to depart from evil. The fear of the Lord is not terror, but a wholesome reverence that gives Him the place of supreme honour.
- Lamp — "An end to darkness" is a miner carrying light into the deepest shaft. He hunts "stones of darkness" hidden in the gloom.
- Cost — The depths are like the shadow of death, and they often bury the miner. Nothing holds him back. Men will give their lives for gold.
- Motive — Behind the daring is covetousness. There is self in all of it — what makes a man rich, what brings money and standing.
- Limit — Every barrier gives way except one. Men discover an immense deal, and wisdom still eludes them.
- Answer — Wisdom is not in the earth at all. It comes down from heaven, and God names it: the fear of the Lord, and turning from evil.
He openeth a shaft far from the inhabitants [of the earth] forgotten of the foot, they hang suspended; away below men they hover.
Job 28:4 sits inside a picture of mining. Miners cut shafts in lonely places and go down into the dark, all for metal and gems buried underground. The skill is real. The question Job is heading toward is one that skill cannot answer.
Job writes here like a man who knows the mining trade.
Job shows that he had a good knowledge of mining operations. He knows of veins of silver and how men refine gold. Men take iron out of the earth and melt copper out of stone. Then he describes the miner with his lamp. The miner makes an end to the darkness as he digs into the mountains, and then he sinks a shaft. They are so far down that the foot passing above knows nothing of where they are. He mentions the dangers of mining too: "they hang (suspended by ropes) far from men, they swing to and fro." Man does all this, risking life and comfort, to get gold and the treasures of the earth.
Another writer reads the same details the same way: the shaft is opened where nobody lives, and rope is the only way in.
He sinks a shaft into the earth in places away from civilisation (v.4), let themselves down by ropes, and swing to and fro with the object of finding the metal they desire.
Commentators differ over what the verse describes. Working from an older English translation, one writer reads it as underground water, not as men hanging on ropes. He explains why water matters so much in a mine.
"The flood breaks out from the inhabitant" — water there is very dangerous. So the great point is to get rid of it safely. They drain it or turn it aside so that they may work their mine. "Even the waters forgotten of the foot." That is, waters that people do not walk beside — not rivers and streams, but water deep in the earth. "They are dried up; they are gone away from men." That is the drainage, done to carry the work on.
One writer names the motive behind all the skill.
He knows how to pursue his way despite the darkness, which he overcomes with artificial light. He goes on no matter what the danger — a danger learnt every now and then at the cost of life. We see the shaft formed far away from human dwelling. We see the means used to carry men where none could walk, suspended by ropes, it would seem, and swinging to and fro… Man's daring resources, with covetousness behind, conquer all difficulties.
Another writer sets this against what the surface of the earth already gives.
Men will give their lives for gold. They are not content with the fertile earth that yields food for man's need… What man seeks after is wealth, gold, jewels, glory. For these he is ready to trade his very life and soul… The typical and spiritual teaching here is very clear: "But if we have food and clothing, with these we will be content." Of course this does not mean that these precious things are sinful in themselves, or that their proper use is unnecessary. But the restless craving for them shows the poor heart of man, seeking what can never satisfy.
(The words quoted inside are 1 Timothy 6:8, given here in the ESV.)
All this reach ends at a wall.
They dig down, they divert the underground stream, they make paths untrodden by the strongest of beasts or the most keen-sighted of birds. But in all this searching they never find wisdom… Men may discover much. Since Job's day they have discovered a great deal more. But wisdom eludes them.
One writer turns the miner's persistence into a question.
Again we ask: why will men not work like this for the "hidden wisdom"? Why will they not sift it out as it lies so close by, or, if need be, remove in faith the very mountains of difficulty… "The one who seeks finds" is still true. But the seeking and the finding are different from what the toil for gold would suggest. The wisdom is hidden, the way to it is not known, because God is not known, and men will not listen to Him.
Where, then, does the chapter land? The answer does not come from the mine.
Man knows nothing of wisdom; but it is not here… It is not in this world. It is not in man as he is. Eagerness after present objects only shuts it out… The answer comes at last from God Himself: "The fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding."
- Dig — The verse pictures a shaft cut far from any settlement. Men hang on ropes in the dark, far below any foot that passes above.
- Danger — Men pay for this with their lives. The skill is real, and so is the covetousness behind it.
- Depth — Man reaches where no bird flies and no lion treads, and still comes up empty of wisdom.
- Disagreement — Commentators differ on the wording. Some read men hanging by ropes. Others read underground water, drained off so the mine can be worked.
- Direction — Turn that same tireless search toward God, and it finds what the mine never held. The fear of the Lord is wisdom, and turning from evil is understanding.
As for the earth, out of it cometh bread, and underneath it is turned up as by fire;
Job pauses his argument with his friends to describe something everyone can see: people dig. Verse 5 sets ground that gives us food beside the same ground ripped open far below — and the chapter will ask what all that digging never finds.
The verse contrasts the surface of the ground with what lies far below it. One commentator reads "underneath it" as pointing deep down into the earth. He takes the passage as a picture of mining, and notes that even sharp-eyed birds never go where the miner goes:
"As for the earth, out of it comes bread, but underneath it" — that is deep down in it — "is turned up as by fire. The stones of it are the place of sapphires" — precious stones as well as these metals — "and it has dust of gold." The birds do not enter into these depths. They go up into the heights, and they cross the whole surface of the earth. But they do not venture into the mines where man goes down. Not even the vulture.
Commentators differ on what the fire pictures. A second reading ties it to how the treasure below ground came to be:
The earth itself produces bread, that is, grain, though deeper down the earth is turned up as by fire (v.5). "Its stones are the source of sapphires" (v.6). Stones by intense heat produce precious stones, and gold dust is found where heat has been. Job suggests that man knows these things and takes advantage of them.
The two halves of the verse are also a moral contrast. God gives food on the surface; man rips open what is underneath. One writer takes the fire as the violence of the search itself:
Men will give their lives for gold. They are not content with the fertile earth yielding food for man's need; they tear it and search its depths as a fire burning and destroying. Such seems to be the clear meaning of verse 5. It is wealth, gold, jewels, glory, that man seeks after, and for which he is ready to barter his very life and soul. Look at the history of the mining camps of modern times, and it confirms all that Job says. What greed, lust and violence rule in these places… What a contrast to the peaceful work of gathering the rich harvests God has provided on the very surface of the earth. The lesson pictured here is very clear: "Having food and clothing, with these we will be content." Of course this does not mean that these precious things are sinful in themselves, or that their proper use is unnecessary. But the restless craving for them is a sign of the poor heart of man, looking for what can never satisfy.
Note the balance there: the metals and jewels are not condemned. It is the craving that is being weighed.
Verse 5 is not a stray observation. It belongs to the chapter's opening block, and the whole chapter moves from what man can dig up to what only God can reveal:
The chapter may be divided into seven portions. (1) The treasures of earth (vv. 1-6). (2) The hidden treasure (vv. 7-11). (3) Not revealed by nature (vv. 12-14). (4) Its priceless value tested (vv. 15-19). (5) Its report (vv. 20-22). (6) The Revealer (vv. 23-27). (7) The Revelation (v. 28).
One writer links the bread that comes out of the earth to the day Jesus fed a crowd. Jesus did not call down bread from heaven. He began with what the ground had already grown:
The Lord then called on the disciples to gather their resources. He said to them, "How many loaves do you have?" He was about to show before their eyes His own saying, "To the one who has, more will be given." They answer, Seven. And these loaves the Lord took as the beginning of the food-supply for the people. He did not as of old call down bread out of heaven, but He made use of what came out of the earth (Job 28:5). To this fruit of human toil, already multiplied from the bare grain, He gave a further increase.
All this skill and daring proves the point Job is driving at. Man reaches places no animal reaches — and still comes up empty on the one thing that matters:
They dig down, they divert the underground stream, they make paths untrodden by the strongest of beasts or the most keen-sighted of birds. But in all this searching they never find wisdom. He raised this question in verse 12, and he was right that these human activities could not find it. Men may discover much, and since Job's day they have discovered a great deal more, but wisdom eludes them.
- Above. The surface of the earth gives bread — food God provides without a shaft or a rope.
- Below. Deeper down, the ground is turned up as by fire. Commentators differ on what that fire pictures: the heat that formed the gems, or the tearing violence of the search.
- Beyond. Man cuts paths that the strongest beasts and the sharpest-eyed birds never take — not even the vulture.
- Bread, not gold. The restless craving, not the metal itself, is what exposes a heart looking for what cannot satisfy — "having food and clothing, with these we will be content."
- But not wisdom. Every new shaft answers the chapter's question the same way. With all man uncovers, wisdom is never among the finds.
The stones of it are the place of sapphires, and it hath dust of gold.
Job breaks off his long argument with his friends. He turns to the wealth buried in the earth: stones that hold sapphires, and dust of gold. The picture is exact, and it is going somewhere. By verse 12 he asks where to find wisdom, and whether any mine can yield it.
Verse 6 says the earth holds dust of gold. That wording is precise: gold turns up in a different form from silver.
Men do not find gold in veins like silver. They find it in quite a different way — very often in the form of dust, and sometimes of nuggets. But silver they find in large and rich veins.
Verse 6 adds precious stones to the metals. The same writer moves from that straight to the question the search cannot answer.
"Its stones are the place of sapphires" — precious stones as well as these metals — "and it has dust of gold." … "But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. Here is what will make a man rich. Here is what will bring money and perhaps distinction. But where shall wisdom be found?
Readers have puzzled over how this chapter connects to the one before it. One commentator answers that what looks like an extreme case is the common story of the human race.
This might look like an extreme case. But in truth it is the all too common experience of the human race. Men chase an empty show. They are eager for every other object under the sun — yes, deep inside the earth and in the depths of the sea. And they overlook the wisdom that consists in the fear of the Lord and can never be separated from it, and the understanding that turns away from evil.
Others see the connection as a straight contrast between two kinds of wealth, and read verses 1-6 as the first of seven movements in the chapter.
Job next contrasts the doom of the ungodly rich, as described in the previous chapter, with the true riches, which can never be lost. … The opening part of the chapter describes the toil and care with which men search for the "delved gold," which so often brings but the "strife and curse which fall over it." He then passes on to the true riches — wisdom; where shall it be found?
The search has a price. One commentator counts what men pay for it.
Men will give their lives for gold. The fertile earth yields food for man's need, but that does not content them. They tear it open and search its depths like a fire burning and destroying. … Man seeks after wealth, gold, jewels and glory, and he is ready to barter his very life and soul for them. … The lesson pictured here is very clear: "If we have food and clothing, with these we will be content." Of course this does not mean that these precious things are sinful in themselves, or that their proper use is unnecessary. But the restless craving for them points to the poor heart of man, seeking what can never satisfy. If only he had used the same earnestness in seeking the true riches, how different the result would be.
One writer sums up the whole mining passage, and adds what the years since have shown.
They dig down. They divert the underground stream. They cut paths that the strongest beasts and the sharpest-eyed birds have never walked. But in all this searching they never find wisdom. This is the question he raised in verse 12, and he was quite right that no one finds it in these human activities. Men may discover much. Since Job's day they have discovered far more. But wisdom still eludes them. If Job could see man's activities and discoveries in our atomic age, he would say the same, only a hundred times more strongly.
Miners learn to judge what is worth having. One commentator adds that they still get it wrong.
They gain a keen sense of what is worth something — though by no means are they always right. Sometimes the miners in our country have thrown away as rubbish what was just as valuable as all that their mind was set upon. But as a general rule they learn what is valuable.
Read as a picture, the gold of verse 6 points past itself.
Men will travel to the ends of the earth for gold — gold refined in the fire and made into beautiful ornaments and the king's crown. But most people treat the true gold, the righteousness of God in Christ, as worthless.
- Dig. Verse 6 names the earth's hidden wealth: stones that hold sapphires, and dust of gold. Gold comes as dust and nuggets, not in veins like silver.
- Find. Man's skill works. He digs down, turns the underground water aside, and cuts paths where no bird or beast has gone.
- Pay. The price shows the heart. Men barter life and soul for what can never satisfy, while the surface of the earth yields bread.
- Fail. Every discovery leaves the question of verse 12 unanswered. There is self in all of it, but no wisdom.
- Miss. The one gold worth having is the righteousness of God in Christ, and most people pass it by as worthless.
It is a path no bird of prey knoweth, and the vulture's eye hath not seen it;
Job has been describing miners who tunnel into the earth for silver, gold and precious stones. Then he points to a path that no digging, no flight and no strength has ever found. The question the chapter is driving toward is not where treasure is, but where wisdom is.
Job names two creatures for what they can do. One sees everything below from the sky. The other relies on sheer strength.
In this section Job speaks of things that are usually hidden from people, but which God brings to light (v.11). There is a path that no bird knows, though it can fly high above earth to observe what is below. No falcon's eye (which is amazingly keen) discerns it (v.7). The proud or fierce lion cannot force his way into it by his superior strength (v.8).
Man goes the other direction — down. His digging can make him rich, and it still leaves the chapter's question open.
The birds go up into the heights and cross the whole surface of the earth, but they do not venture into the mines where man goes down... There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and perhaps distinction; but where shall wisdom be found? and where is the place of understanding? Well, it is not on the earth.
Older translations call the bird a fowl and the falcon a vulture, which is why several writers use those words. The bird and the lion stand for two things people trust in themselves: sight and strength. Neither reaches this road.
No eye so keen in nature as the vulture's; no animal so bold as the lion. But the boldness and long-sightedness of nature are not equal for the path of faith. Only an eye fixed on Christ as its one Object will give spiritual understanding.
If wisdom is not in the mine, the sea or the sky, it must come from somewhere higher.
True wisdom and true understanding not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ... "The sea says, It is not with me... It is hidden from the eyes of all living, and kept close from the birds of the air."
Commentators read this hidden path as the Lord's own path through this world.
A path that the sharpest natural sight, pictured here by the vulture's eye, has never seen must be a remarkable path. Such was the Lord's path here... That one path was a lonely one for the Lord while He was on earth. Foxes had holes, and birds had nests, but He had no pillow.
Where that path ended is as far beyond nature's reach as the path itself.
"I am he that lives and was dead, and behold I am alive for evermore," are His new titles and dignities. By them He has passed into a sphere beyond the vulture's eye, a sphere no bird knows, which the lion's whelps have not trodden, and where the fierce lion has never passed by.
The natural eye cannot see this way, so the believer needs another kind of sight.
The path of separation is too narrow for the natural eye to discern. The word of God lays down no broad lines to mark the Christian's way through this world. Only the spiritual eye can see the way out of it.
So where does this path lead?
Like the path of death, it passes through a world of sorrow — yes, through the valley of the shadow of death. But unlike the path of death, it leads into the presence of the LORD, where there is fulness of joy and pleasures for evermore.
Job 28 does not leave the question hanging. The chapter gives its own answer at the end.
It cannot be that we must live in error, in darkness, or uncertainty. "There is a path," blessed be God, though "no bird knows it, and the vulture's eye has not seen it. The lion's whelps have not trodden it, nor the fierce lion passed by it." Where is this safe and blessed path? Hear the divine reply: "Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom: and to depart from evil is understanding." (Job 28)
- Hidden — The bird's eye and the lion's strength are nature's best. Sight and force at their peak still miss this path.
- Higher — Man digs down and finds silver and gold, but not wisdom. Wisdom is not in the earth at all. It comes down from heaven.
- Him — Commentators read this path as the Lord's own lonely road through this world. It ends in a sphere beyond the vulture's eye.
- Ours — This same path passes through sorrow, yet it leads into the presence of the LORD, where there is fulness of joy.
- How — No broad lines mark it out, so only the spiritual eye sees it. The chapter's answer is the fear of the Lord and turning from evil.
The proud beasts have not trodden it, nor the fierce lion passed over it.
Job is describing a miner. He sinks a shaft, breaks into the rock and brings up gold and gems from places no animal has reached. Verse 8 measures that feat by what it leaves behind: the boldest beasts on earth have never walked there.
Verse 8 belongs to a short section about what lies hidden under the ground.
In this section Job speaks of things more hidden from people normally, but which God brings to light (v.11). There is a path that no bird knows, though it can fly high above earth to observe what is below. No falcon's eye (which is amazingly keen) discerns it (v.7). The proud or fierce lion cannot force his way into it by his superior strength (v.8).
Commentators differ over whether verses 7-11 still describe mining or already reach past it. Ridout points to Job's repeated wording in verse 21.
Delitzsch connects this portion (verses 7-11) closely with what goes before, as describing the search after earth's precious stores. Part of it does go into further details. But the similarity of verse 21 to verses 7 and 8 suggests that even this early in the chapter Job is hinting at his main theme — the true riches. Verse 12 confirms this thought.
Man goes where no lion can follow, and still comes up empty.
Job 28 holds remarkable words about man's search after wisdom. In Job's day people mined for iron or copper, for gold or silver or gems, and it may have been a new pursuit then. They dig down, they divert the underground stream, they make paths untrodden by the strongest of beasts or the most keen-sighted of birds. But in all this searching they never find wisdom.
Kelly weighs what all that effort actually gains.
"But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and perhaps distinction; but where shall wisdom be found? and where is the place of understanding?
Verse 7 names a bird, verse 8 a lion. Each is nature at its peak. (Where the ESV has "falcon," older translations read "vulture.")
In the path of God's will mere human wisdom and understanding will not help. It is a path no bird knows and no lion has trodden (Job 28:7-8). No eye in nature is as keen as the vulture's; no animal is as bold as the lion. But the boldness and long sight of nature are not equal to the path of faith. Only singleness of eye, with Christ as its one Object, will give spiritual understanding.
Ridout reads the lion's desert as land that gives the soul nothing:
The wide deserts, where the proud lion roams with no fear of man, hold no treasure that the heart craves. The hermits, the "desert dwellers," have failed to get peace for their souls by their fasting and punishing of the body.
If the search downward fails, the chapter looks up. The One who knows the way is not only the Maker of the world but the One who shows Himself in His Son.
We turn now from nature to its Author, from creation to God. He knows the way, and He alone can reveal it to man. And it is not merely God as Creator, but as Revealer in the person of His Son — "I am the way, and the truth, and the life." … He has seen wisdom; no, He is that Wisdom.
The path is not locked shut. The chapter's closing answer brings it within reach.
It cannot be that we are forced to live in error, in darkness, or in uncertainty. "There is a path," blessed be God, though "no bird of prey knows it … the proud beasts have not trodden it." Where is this safe and blessed path? Hear the divine reply: "Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding." (Job 28)
- Hidden — The verse names a path no sharp-eyed bird has seen and no strong beast has walked.
- Hinted — The same wording returns later in the chapter. Job is pointing past buried ore to the true riches.
- Hollow — Men dig where no animal can follow and bring up gold; wisdom is the one thing the digging never turns up.
- Helpless — Keen sight and bold strength, the best nature offers, are not equal to the path of faith.
- Held out — God alone knows the way, and shows it in His Son; He holds the path out to anyone who fears the Lord and turns from evil.
[Man] putteth forth his hand upon the flinty rock, he overturneth the mountains by the root.
Job pictures human achievement: men digging deep into the earth for treasure. Verse 9 shows that effort at its peak, and it sets up the question the whole chapter asks — where is wisdom found?
One commentator pictures the miner at work in the rocks:
Job returns to the search for treasure. He describes a fruitless quest, in which man takes hold of the rocks (possibly pebbles) and overturns the mountains. We see him washing and sifting the pebbles and sand, or blasting into the solid mountains. He cuts his way deep down, following the vein like a river in its course. He looks with greedy eyes at the rich shining treasures locked up in it.
The chapter does not belittle human skill. It measures it, and finds that skill and wisdom are not the same thing:
This is a very remarkable chapter. It follows man's skill doing all sorts of things — metallurgy, engineering, damming the floods, and bringing hidden things out of the earth. Skill that is unlimited in a certain sense, in what is subject to him — but this is not wisdom.
A man who can overturn a mountain learns to tell treasure from rubbish. But what is he after?
They gain a keen understanding of what things are worth — though by no means are they always right... but as a rule they learn what is valuable. "But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and perhaps distinction. But where shall wisdom be found?
Men will move mountains when they want something enough. The same is not true of their search for wisdom:
Again we ask, why will men not labour like this for the "hidden wisdom"? Why will they not seek to sift it out as it lies so close by, or, if need be, in faith remove the very mountains of difficulty? The course of this world sweeps along like a river. If it would swallow up the true riches, why do men not stop it, or turn it away from them, so that they may take hold of this thing whose value is above all wealth?
Centuries of digging and discovery since Job have not changed the outcome:
They dig down. They divert the underground stream. They make paths untrodden by the strongest beasts or the sharpest-eyed birds. But in all this searching they never find wisdom... Men may discover much. Since Job's day they have discovered an immense amount more. But wisdom eludes them. If Job could see man's activities and discoveries in our atomic age, he would say the same, only with emphasis a hundredfold greater.
If wisdom is not in the ore or the overturned mountain, it must come from somewhere else:
What a very solemn thing that is! True wisdom and true understanding are not found in the earth at all. It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ.
The chapter ends with an answer that changes how a person sees everything:
The depths of the earth will not reveal it, and its value far exceeds that of gold and rubies. God alone can declare its true nature and value: "And He said to man, 'Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding.'" ... So until God has His rightful place in a man's mind and heart, he cannot view anything wisely. His thoughts are off centre. His beginning is all wrong.
- Skill — Human power at full stretch: a hand on flint, mountains uprooted, veins traced deep underground. The chapter does not deny the achievement.
- Limit — That skill is "unlimited in a certain sense, in what is subject to him" — and still it is not wisdom. Capability and wisdom are different currencies.
- Motive — Behind the moved mountain is self: what will make a man rich, what will bring money and distinction. The trained eye learns what is valuable and misses the one thing worth most.
- Misdirection — Men will remove mountains for gold but not for wisdom, though wisdom "lies so close by." The problem is not lack of energy but aim.
- Source — Wisdom is not in the earth at all; it comes down from heaven and is found in Christ. It starts where the mining stops: the fear of the Lord, and turning from evil.
He cutteth out channels in the rocks, and his eye seeth every precious thing.
Job has been describing the mines of his day: deep shafts, ropes swinging in the dark, ore torn out of the rock. Verse 10 is the peak of that skill, and it leads straight to a question no miner can answer.
Nothing in the rock is hard enough to stop the search. One commentator also names what drives it.
Man's daring resources, with greed behind them, conquer every difficulty. The hard flint gives way to his hand. He overturns mountains by the root if they stand in his way, and he cuts rivers through the rocks, to reach the precious things his eye picks out.
The verse describes a method, not just brute strength.
He cuts his way deep down, following the vein the way a river follows its course, and looking with greedy eyes at the rich shining treasures locked up inside. If water flows in, he finds a way to divert it, so that he can go after the hidden wealth he has uncovered.
The verse credits the miner with an eye that "sees every precious thing" — a real skill. But even here the expert gets it wrong.
They develop a very sensitive sense of what a thing is worth — though they are by no means always right. Sometimes miners in our country have thrown away as rubbish something just as valuable as the thing they were after. But as a rule they do learn what is valuable.
Commentators differ over who does the cutting. Most take it to be man. One reads verses 9 to 11 as God at work, and makes the timing of every discovery His.
God's hand does what creatures cannot. He overturns mountains at the roots, to expose what lies hidden beneath (v.9). Through the hard rocks He cuts out channels, using water to wear the rock away. And in those rocks "He sees every precious thing" — which man would not discover until God saw fit to uncover it (v.10).
Right after this display of skill, Job asks where wisdom is. No amount of digging turns it up, and the centuries since have not changed that.
They dig down, they divert the underground stream, they make paths where the strongest beast and the sharpest-eyed bird have never walked. But in all this searching they never find wisdom. This is the question he raised in verse 12, and he was right to say that these human activities could not find it. Men may discover much, and since Job's day they have discovered a great deal more, but wisdom still escapes them.
One commentator names what the digging does produce, and what it never touches.
No, there is no wisdom in any of that. There is self in all of it. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and maybe status; but "Where shall wisdom be found? And where is the place of understanding?"
Put the effort men spend on ore beside the effort they spend on God, and the verse turns into a rebuke.
Again we ask: why will men not work this hard for the "hidden wisdom"? Why will they not sift it out, when it lies so close at hand — or, if they must, remove by faith the very mountains of difficulty? If the sweeping rush of "the course of this world" would swallow the true riches like a river, why do men not stop it, or turn it aside, so that they may have for themselves what is worth more than all wealth? "The one who seeks finds" is still true, though this seeking and this finding are nothing like the hard work of digging for gold. The wisdom stays hidden and the way to it stays unknown, because men do not know God and will not listen to Him.
- Skill — Human power at its peak: flint gives way, mountains come up by the roots, water turns aside, and a trained eye picks out the treasure.
- Motive — Behind that skill lies greed. The energy is real, but so is the self in it.
- Limit — The same eye that spots every precious stone has thrown away as rubbish what was worth as much as the prize.
- Question — Right after this triumph the chapter asks, "Where shall wisdom be found?" Centuries of discovery since have brought no answer.
- Redirection — Aim that same energy at God: remove the mountains of difficulty, turn back the rush of the world's course, and seek what is worth more than all wealth.
He bindeth the streams that they drip not, and what is hidden he bringeth forth to light.
The mining picture in Job 28 ends here. Water floods the shaft, so the miner shuts it off and lifts out what the earth had buried. Then comes the question that gives this line its weight: a man who can do all this still has to ask where wisdom is.
Before this verse, the miner has sunk his shaft and followed the vein. When underground water threatens the work, he moves it out of his way.
Coming back to the search for treasure, Job describes this fruitless hunt, in which man lays hold of the rocks and overturns the mountains… He cuts his way deep down, following the vein like a river in its course, and looking with greedy eyes at the rich shining treasures locked up inside. If water flows in, he finds a way to divert it, so that he can go after the hidden wealth he has now uncovered.
Commentators differ on who is acting in verses 9–11. Most take it as the miner. One reads the subject as God, whose dams block the digger instead of helping him.
But God's hand does what creatures cannot. It even overturns mountains at the roots, to uncover what lies hidden beneath (v.9). In the rocks "He sees every precious thing," which man would not discover until God saw fit to expose it (v.10). On streams where man may expect to find treasure, He places dams that thwart men's intentions. But in the end, even what is hidden God brings forth (v.11).
Whoever drains the water, the success is real. That is what makes the next question so sharp.
"He dams up the streams so that they do not trickle, and the thing that is hidden he brings out to light. But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and perhaps distinction; but where shall wisdom be found? and where is the place of understanding? Well, it is not on the earth.
The verse describes enormous trouble taken for metal. Ridout turns that energy into a question about the better treasure.
Again we ask: why will men not work this hard for the "hidden wisdom"? Why will they not sift it out where it lies so close by, or, if need be, remove by faith the very mountains of difficulty? If "the course of this world" would sweep over the true riches like a river, why do men not stop it, or turn it away from them, so that they can have what is worth more than all wealth? "The one who seeks finds" is still true. But the seeking and the finding are not what the toil for gold would suggest.
The mind that drains a flooded mine is a remarkable thing. Its failure to find God is therefore not a failure of ability.
"He can cut out channels among the rocks, and his eyes see every precious thing. He can dam up the streams, and bring what is hidden out to light" (Job 28). But he has lost the knowledge of God through sin, and lost all desire for that knowledge. "No one understands; no one seeks for God." The guilt is not in the capacity, but in the will. "People loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil."
If wisdom is not under the ground, it has to come from somewhere else.
True wisdom and true understanding are not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ… There was a report of that One who is Himself wisdom, and who is the Giver of wisdom to the meek. It was by death that it came to us.
- Dig: the miner shuts off the underground water and lifts buried wealth into daylight. It is the peak of human skill in the chapter.
- Differ: commentators split on who acts. Most see the miner. One sees God, uncovering what no creature could reach.
- Fall short: the digging succeeds and still misses the prize — "there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that."
- Will, not skill: the same mind that masters rock and flood has lost the desire for God; "the guilt is not in the capacity, but in the will."
- Descend: wisdom is never dug up; it comes down from heaven, and is found in Christ.
But wisdom, where shall it be found? and where is the place of understanding?
Job has just described men tunnelling into the earth for silver, gold and sapphires. Then he stops and asks the one question all that digging cannot answer: can human skill, wealth or exploration ever reach the place where wisdom lives?
Job watched men do remarkable things with rock and water, and saw that none of it produced what he was after.
In Job's day people practised mining. It may have been a new pursuit then, whether for iron or copper, for gold or silver or gems. They dig down, they divert the underground stream, they cut paths that the strongest beasts and the sharpest-eyed birds have never walked. But in all this searching they never find wisdom. This is the question he raised in verse 12, and he was right to say that these human activities could not find it. Men may discover much. Since Job's day they have discovered far more. But wisdom still escapes them.
The failure is not only in the method. The motive matters too.
"But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and perhaps distinction; but where shall wisdom be found? and where is the place of understanding? Well, it is not on the earth, and it is not down in the dark mines where men rush after what they value.
The following verses answer by elimination — not in the deep, not in the sea, not for gold. If wisdom had a price tag, wealth would settle the matter.
Man, frail mortal, does not know the price and does not have it to pay, for it is not found in the land of the living. If it were within reach, some would be able to reach it; some rich man would have the price to pay for it. But it is beyond man. "It is high, I cannot attain it." In the bottomless depths of the deep — "the waters under the earth" — the call for wisdom wakes only one reply: "It is not in me." The wide sea, for all its vastness, does not hold this priceless treasure. Nature, by itself, cannot give a single clue to this heavenly, wondrous good.
A strange witness answers. Destruction and death say they have heard of wisdom, and their report tells us something real, yet it stops short.
Where shall wisdom be found, and where is the path of understanding? It is not found in the land of the living. Destruction and death say we have heard a report of it with our ears. So they have. They tell us the emptiness of all the scene we are in, and, above all, of man at the head of it, the sorest place of all. But it is only negative.
Another writer weighs what a mere report is worth.
"Destruction and death say, We have heard a report about it with our ears" (v. 22), but only a report, for wisdom itself is known only by a direct revelation from God.
The chapter does not leave the question open. God Himself names where wisdom starts.
God alone can declare its true nature and value. To man He said, "Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding." Solomon added to this later: "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and the knowledge of the Holy One is insight" (Prov. 9:10). So until God gets His rightful place in a man's mind and heart, he cannot see anything wisely. His thoughts are off-centre. His beginning is all wrong.
Some commentators read Job's question as reaching past his own day. The answer, they say, is a Person.
True wisdom and true understanding not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ, and Christ had not yet come. This came out even more in Christ's rejection and Christ's death… "Destruction and death say, We have heard a report of it with our ears." Yes, it was just that very thing. There was a report of that One who is Himself wisdom, and who is the Giver of wisdom to the meek. It was by death that it came to us, but they did not know it.
- Searched — Human skill goes where no bird or beast can follow, yet comes back without wisdom. Discovery has multiplied since Job; the result is unchanged.
- Self — Gain and distinction drive the digging, so the motive spoils the search before it starts.
- Priceless — No sum buys it and no depth holds it; if money could buy it, the rich would already have it.
- Revealed — Death has heard only a rumour of wisdom; it must come down as revelation from God, not up out of the ground.
- Found — God answers His own question. To fear Him and turn from evil is where wisdom starts, and commentators point on to Christ, who is Himself wisdom.
Man knoweth not the value thereof; and it is not found in the land of the living.
Job 28 turns from the arguments of Job's friends to a poem about mining. Men tunnel through rock for silver, gold and sapphires — so where is wisdom dug up? Verse 13 answers, and the answer is negative. No one knows what wisdom costs, and no one in the land of the living has it.
All that mining skill, one writer notes, produces wealth but not wisdom.
"He dams up the streams so that they do not trickle, and the thing that is hidden he brings out to light. But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and perhaps distinction; but where shall wisdom be found? and where is the place of understanding?
"Man does not know its worth" means more than ignorance of value. Man also has no price to pay. Here the search moves outward from man to the deep and the sea, and every answer comes back empty.
Man, frail and mortal, does not know the price and does not have it to pay, for wisdom is not found in the land of the living. If it were within reach, then someone would be able to reach it; some rich man would have the price to pay for it. But it is beyond man: "it is high; I cannot attain it." Down in the bottomless depths — "the waters under the earth" — the call for wisdom goes out, and the answer comes back, "It is not in me." The wide sea, for all its vast expanse, does not hold this priceless treasure. Nature, by itself, cannot give even a simple clue to this heavenly, this wonderful good.
The phrase "the land of the living" means this present world of people going about their lives. One writer explains why this world holds no right road, and why death can only report what it has heard.
Where all is morally wrong and departed from God, there can be no right path. Adam did not need a path. He had only to stay where he was. When we have gone wrong, and are driven out by God, and so need a path, none can be found. There is none... Destruction and death say we have heard the fame of it with our ears. So they have. They tell us how empty this whole scene is, and above all how empty man is at the head of it, which is the most painful point of all. But it is only negative. This is an immense truth, that there is no way for living man fallen from God.
The chapter does not leave the search there. What man cannot price, God can locate.
Does it not seem like a hopeless case for any poor ignorant mortal to search for this wondrous pathway? No, blessed be God, it is by no means a hopeless case, for "He understands the way to it, and He knows its place."
Several writers read the chapter forward to Christ. Wisdom is not dug up; it arrives.
True wisdom and true understanding not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ, and Christ had not yet come. This came out even more clearly in Christ's rejection and death... There was a report of that One who is Himself wisdom, and who is the Giver of wisdom to the meek. It was by death that it came to us, but they did not know it.
Another writer ties the same chapter to the Cross.
Yes, God knew the wisdom that was needed. When that "hidden wisdom" came out in Christ, and the world crucified the Lord of glory, then death and destruction heard its fame! It was at that wonderful Cross that God brought His attributes and His nature into harmony, so that sinful man could be blessed.
The chapter ends with God's own word to man.
"And He said to man, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding." ... So until God has His rightful place in a man's mind and heart, he cannot see anything wisely. His thoughts are out of centre. His beginning is all wrong.
- Mined — Man can tunnel down to sapphires and gold, but no shaft reaches wisdom. The digging serves self.
- Priceless — Not knowing its worth means not owning the price. If wisdom could be bought, the rich would already have it.
- Roadless — There is no right path in a world that has left God, so "the land of the living" has none to show.
- Revealed — What man cannot price, God knows the place of; wisdom comes down from heaven and is found in Christ.
- Received — God's answer is not a place but the fear of the Lord. Until He has His rightful place in us, no thinking is wise.
The deep saith, It is not in me; and the sea saith, It is not with me.
Job has just described how far mining reaches — men sink shafts where no bird flies and turn mountains over. Then he asks creation itself for wisdom, and both the deep and the sea answer that they do not have it.
The verse follows a picture of human skill and industry. One writer notes how far that skill had already gone in Job's day, and how little it found:
In his days men were mining: it may have been a new pursuit then, whether for iron or copper, for gold or silver or gems. They dig down, they divert the underground stream, they make paths that no strong beast or sharp-eyed bird has ever travelled. But in all this searching they never find wisdom... Men may discover much, and since Job's day they have discovered far more, but wisdom eludes them.
The deep and the sea speak here, and both deny holding what man wants. One writer sets their answer next to man's own failure to find wisdom or pay for it:
But while man is told to seek, this wisdom is not found in nature, nor by human effort... Man, frail mortal, does not know and does not have the price to obtain it, for it is not found in the land of the living... In the deepest depths of the abyss — "the waters under the earth" — the call for wisdom awakens only the reply, "It is not in me." The wide sea, in all its vast expanse, does not hold this priceless treasure. Nature, on its own, cannot give even a simple clue to this heavenly, wonderful good.
The deep is not empty, yet what fills it is not wisdom. One writer points to where wisdom does come from:
True wisdom and true understanding are not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ; and Christ had not yet come... "Therefore the deep says, 'It is not in me.'" There are silver and gold in the deep, and other things like them, and precious stones.
Mining brings up riches. Kelly names what drives that search:
No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and perhaps distinction; but where shall wisdom be found?
Why has the sea no answer? One writer points to the gap between material things and moral ones:
Moral things are greater than material things. Man is after all greater than the whole of the material universe. Inanimate creation cannot commune with God. Man can. Here stands his greatness, as given by God, and his responsibility.
Job does not leave the question open. The chapter closes with God's own answer:
The depths of the earth will not reveal it, and its value far exceeds that of gold and rubies. God alone can declare its true nature and value, "and to man He said, 'Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding.'"... Therefore until God gets His rightful place in a man's mind and heart he is incapable of viewing anything wisely. His thoughts are out of centre. His beginning is all wrong.
Ridout adds one more turn. Knowing God changes what a person hears in the same creation:
And yet, when once God is known, we find all nature eloquent of Him. Those depths below and above declare His glory and power. The "great and wide sea" tells of the depth of His wisdom, care and goodness... How sad it is to see men of vast knowledge, of profound reasoning powers, gazing into the glorious heavens and failing to find God or wisdom there... How blessed it is then to have the true wisdom — "Christ the wisdom of God, and the power of God."
- Where man digs — human skill reaches where no beast or bird has walked, and brings up gold, silver and gems. It has never brought up wisdom.
- Where creation answers — the deep and the sea both say wisdom is not with them. Nature cannot give even a clue.
- Where the mistake lies — men search the material world for a moral treasure. Man alone can commune with God, and that is his greatness.
- Where God speaks — God's own answer is the fear of the Lord and turning away from evil. Until God holds His rightful place in a man's heart, his thoughts stay out of centre.
- Where wisdom lives — writers point to Christ, the wisdom of God. Once a person knows Him, the same silent depths and seas speak of His glory.
Choice gold cannot be given for it, nor silver be weighed for its price.
Job has just described men digging for treasure — cutting tunnels, overturning rock, hauling silver and gold into the light. Then he stops and asks where wisdom is kept, and this verse is his first answer: gold cannot buy it.
Job is answering his three friends. They had claimed to understand God's ways.
Job's friends thought they had "the secrets of wisdom" (ch. 11:6), but Job could see that their arguments were not wise at all. So he confronts them: wisdom is not so easy to get. In fact, wisdom cannot be bought with gold or silver (v.15).
Job now measures wisdom against the best that people own.
Something of such priceless value is now tested against everything man counts as treasure. Pure gold and silver, weighed out without limit, cannot buy it. The fine gold of Ophir, the precious onyx and the sapphire — "a king's ransom" — have no place here… We search all of nature in vain for anything to compare with it, for its price is above every treasure on earth. If only men saw this, so that they might find the one jewel of eternal value. Everything else is nothing without it.
The problem is not that the price is too high. Wisdom is of a different kind altogether.
In other words, nothing in nature can come near the value of true wisdom. True wisdom is spiritual, not natural… A person receives this wisdom only through faith in the Lord Jesus, as the Spirit of God reveals it. How wonderful this is, far above all natural understanding!
Men work hard for gold. They dig shafts and turn rivers aside to get it. So why will they not work that hard for wisdom?
Again we ask, why will men not work like this for the "hidden wisdom"? Why will they not sift for it, when it lies so close by? Or, if they must, why not remove the very mountains of difficulty by faith? "The course of this world" rushes past like a river, and it would swallow the true riches. So why do men not dam it, or turn it away, so that they may have the one thing worth more than all wealth? "The one who seeks finds" is still true. But this seeking and finding are not like the hard work of digging for gold. Wisdom is hidden, and the way to it is unknown, because God is unknown, and men will not listen to Him.
So wisdom is not in the mine, the sea, or the market. That leaves only one direction: above.
What a very solemn thing that is! True wisdom and true understanding not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ; and Christ had not yet come; and further, this is what came out still more by Christ's rejection and Christ's death.
The chapter does not leave the question open. God Himself says what wisdom is.
God alone can declare what wisdom really is and what it is worth. He "said to man, 'Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding.'" Solomon said the same thing later: "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and the knowledge of the Holy One is insight" (Prov. 9:10). So until God has His rightful place in a man's mind and heart, that man cannot see anything wisely. His thoughts are off centre. His starting point is all wrong.
- Priced. Job prices wisdom against gold and weighed-out silver. Nothing man counts as treasure can meet the price.
- Refused. Wisdom is not simply expensive. It is of another order — spiritual, not natural — so no amount of wealth ever turns into it.
- Misplaced. Men tunnel through mountains and turn rivers aside for metal. The same effort spent on the hidden wisdom would find it, for "the one who seeks finds."
- Given. Wisdom is not in the earth or the sea. It comes down from heaven, and Christ is where it is found.
- Feared. The chapter's own answer is the fear of the Lord and turning from evil. Leave God out and your thinking is off centre from the start.
It is not set in the balance with gold of Ophir, with the precious onyx, and the sapphire.
Job has just described men tunnelling deep into rock for silver, gold and sapphires. Now he takes the best those mines produce and asks what price could buy wisdom.
One writer traces how far man's mining skill reaches, and where it stops:
"He dams up the streams so that they do not trickle, and the thing that is hidden he brings out to light. But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and perhaps distinction; but where shall wisdom be found? and where is the place of understanding? Well, it is not on the earth, and it is not down in these dark mines where man is so quick to go after what he values.
Job takes everything man counts as treasure and puts it on the scale against wisdom:
Something of such priceless value is now tested by all that man counts treasure. Pure gold and silver, weighed out without limit, cannot buy it. The fine gold of Ophir, the precious onyx and the sapphire — "a king's ransom" — have no place here… Men ransack nature in vain to find anything to compare with wisdom, whose price is above all the treasures of earth. Would that men realised this, so that they might find the one jewel of eternal value. All else is nothing without it.
The onyx has a history in the Bible that makes its appearance here more pointed than a simple mention of a gemstone:
The two stones called "precious" have very significant places. The precious onyx is the first stone named in the Bible (Genesis 2:12). The same verse also mentions gold and bdellium, the substance manna looked like in colour (Numbers 11:7). We find the onyx on the shoulders and breastplate of the high priest in Exodus 28. It appears again in Job 28, in relation to wisdom. Later, in Ezekiel 28:13, it adorns with other gems the king full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
The problem is not a shortage of money. Wisdom and gold belong to two different orders:
Absolutely nothing in nature can approach the value of true wisdom, for this is spiritual, not natural… "But we impart a secret and hidden wisdom of God, which God decreed before the ages for our glory" (1 Corinthians 2:7). This wisdom is received only through faith in the Lord Jesus, by the revelation of the Spirit of God (v. 10).
So what is this wisdom that outweighs sapphire?
What then is this wisdom, of such infinite value, and yet so unattainable? We shall be told in a little while by the Author of it. It must be enough for us here to say that it is the knowledge of the truth, the nature of all things, taken from God Himself. It is a knowledge which does not puff up, nor separate from God. It gives the soul a living principle of peace and joy in communion with Him.
No gem matches the price. So the chapter turns from the market to God Himself:
It is useless to hope for a fair exchange. Men weigh out gold or silver in vain. No gem of Ophir will do, nor onyx, nor sapphire, nor golden glass, nor work of art in gold, nor coral or pearl, nor topaz, nor jewel of the clearest lustre… God understands its way and He knows its place… Yet He also laid down the foundation of all righteousness, and this for favoured man on earth to hear. It is to give God His rights. "Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding."
- Dug. Man can tunnel into rock and bring hidden things to light. He still comes up without wisdom. The mine holds self, not understanding.
- Weighed. Ophir's gold, the onyx, the sapphire — man weighs out his best treasure and still finds no match.
- Priced. No sum works. Wisdom is spiritual, not natural. Faith in the Lord Jesus receives it; money never buys it.
- Defined. Wisdom is the knowledge of the truth, taken from God Himself. It does not puff up. It gives peace and joy in communion with Him.
- Given. What no treasure could buy, God tells plainly: fear Him and turn from evil. The costliest thing in the chapter goes to the one who gives God His rights.
Gold and glass cannot be compared to it, nor vessels of fine gold be its exchange.
Job has just described how far men will dig for silver and gold. Now he weighs the finest of that treasure against wisdom, and it is refused as payment — so how does anyone ever get wisdom?
Job is answering friends who spoke as though wisdom were already in their pocket. One writer sets the chapter against their confidence:
Job's friends thought they had "the secrets of wisdom" (ch.11:6), but Job could see that their arguments were not wise at all. So he confronts them with this: wisdom is not so easily obtained. In fact, wisdom cannot be bought with gold or silver (v.15).
Where the chapter sits matters too. It follows Job's account of the doom of the rich, and turns to riches of another kind:
Job next contrasts the doom of the ungodly rich, described in the previous chapter, with the true riches, which can never be lost. The opening part of the chapter describes the toil and care with which men search for the dug-out gold, which so often brings only the "strife and curse" that fall on it. He then passes on to the true riches — wisdom. Where can it be found?
The word behind "glass" in this verse points to decorated glass, valuable enough to be listed next to gold:
zekukith, Job 28:17: probably richly decorated glass, of the kind made in Egypt. Here it is listed with gold; but wisdom, the gift of God, is worth far more than such things.
Job is running a test, and one commentator traces it item by item:
A thing of such priceless value is now tested against everything man counts as treasure. Pure gold and silver, weighed out without limit, cannot buy it. The fine gold of Ophir, the precious onyx and the sapphire — "a king's ransom" — have no place here. Gold is named again, along with transparent crystal — "pure gold, like transparent glass" — jewels as beautiful as they are rare; corals, pearls, rubies — wisdom's price is higher than all of them. The topaz of far-off Ethiopia looks dull beside this bright jewel of God's glory. Men search all of nature in vain for anything to compare with what is worth more than every earthly treasure.
No exchange rate exists, because the two are not the same kind of thing:
Job continues his subject of wisdom, saying that the finest gold (from Ophir) or onyx or sapphire stones, or crystal, or jewellery of fine gold have no value at all compared with wisdom (vv.16-17)... In other words, nothing in nature can come near the value of true wisdom, for wisdom is spiritual, not natural.
Men dig for gold and crystal and bring them up out of the ground. Wisdom travels in the opposite direction:
What a very solemn thing that is! True wisdom and true understanding are not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ... "Therefore the deep says, 'It is not in me.'" There are silver and gold in the deep, and other such goods, and precious stones. "The sea says, 'It is not with me.'"
Every offer has been refused, which leaves one question:
If man does not know its price, and if it is not to be found in the land of the living... then where am I to turn? If it cannot be bought with gold or precious stones — if the wealth of the universe cannot equal it, and no cleverness of man can discover it — where shall I find it?
Scripture does invite people to "buy" — and then names the currency, which is none:
Scripture urges people elsewhere to "buy," though "without money and without price" (Isa. 55:1)... In fact, the very terms of the gospel are that "the gift of God" cannot be obtained with money, or with anything that might count as its religious equivalent. Pride that will not take a free gift as a gift must be sent away empty.
- Contrast — The chapter sets the doom of the ungodly rich beside true riches, which can never be lost.
- Priceless — Gold, decorated glass and worked jewellery are the best riches the earth yields, and Job shows they cannot buy wisdom.
- Kind — No price works because nothing in nature can come near true wisdom: it is spiritual, not natural.
- Direction — Riches come up out of the mine; wisdom comes down from heaven, and commentators point to Christ as the place it is found.
- Gift — The riches no money can buy, God gives freely; pride that refuses a free gift is sent away empty.
Corals and crystal are no more remembered; yea, the acquisition of wisdom is above rubies.
Job has just described the mines: deep shafts, rock turned over, rivers dammed, all to bring hidden treasure into the light. Now he weighs the best of that treasure against wisdom, and nothing comes close.
The verse belongs to a list that runs from silver and gold through onyx, sapphire, crystal, coral, topaz. One writer treats the list as a test that every earthly treasure fails.
A thing of such priceless value is now tested by everything man counts as treasure. Pure gold and silver, weighed out without limit, cannot buy it... corals, pearls, rubies — wisdom's price is greater than them all. The topaz of far-off Ethiopia looks dull beside this bright jewel of God's glory. Men search all of nature in vain for anything to compare with what is worth more than every earthly treasure.
Commentators differ over the exact stones. Older translations read "rubies" where the ESV reads "pearls," and no one is sure which stone the word names. Its use in Scripture is clearer than its identity.
No one knows for certain which precious stone this word means. Scripture uses it as a symbol of great worth: "the price of wisdom is above rubies"; the value of a virtuous woman is far above rubies. Job 28:18; Prov. 3:15; Prov. 8:11; Prov. 20:15; Prov. 31:10.
Older versions also put "pearls" in the middle of the verse, where the ESV reads "crystal." One writer traces that difference to the Hebrew word itself.
Job 28:18 is no exception, for gabiysh means crystal, not pearl.
Notice that Job does not say wisdom is expensive. He says nobody knows what it costs, and it is not on sale anywhere in the land of the living.
No one on earth knows its price, and in fact it is not found in the land of the living. The deep says wisdom is not in it, and the sea says so even more strongly. There is no hope of trading anything of equal value for it. Weighing out gold or silver is useless. So is the gem of Ophir, or onyx, or sapphire, or golden glass, or fine work in gold, or coral or pearl, or topaz, or the jewel of clearest shine.
The mining picture is not decoration. It sets up an accusation: men will move a mountain for gold and will not lift a finger for something worth more.
Why will men not work like this for the "hidden wisdom"? Why will they not sift it out when it lies so close by, or, if they must, remove the very mountains of difficulty by faith?... "The one who seeks finds" is still true, though the seeking and the finding are not what the toil for gold would suggest. The wisdom is hidden and the way to it unknown, because men do not know God and will not listen to Him.
No jewel comes close because the difference is one of kind, not of amount. Wisdom belongs to another order of things, and it reaches a person another way.
Coral and quartz are not worth mentioning when we weigh the value of wisdom, and neither are rubies... In other words, nothing in nature can come near the value of true wisdom, for this is spiritual, not natural... 1 Corinthians 2:7 tells us, "But we impart a secret and hidden wisdom of God, which God decreed before the ages for our glory." We receive this wisdom only through faith in the Lord Jesus, as the Spirit of God reveals it.
The end of the chapter answers Job's question. The answer is not something a man can mine or buy.
The depths of the earth will not reveal it, and its value is far above gold and rubies. God alone can declare its true nature and value: "And He said to man, 'Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding.'"... So until God has His rightful place in a man's mind and heart, he cannot view anything wisely. His thoughts are off centre. His beginning is all wrong.
- Unpriced — Job does not set a high price on wisdom. He says no one knows its price, and it is not for sale in the land of the living.
- Unmatched — Scripture names coral, crystal and rubies as the top of the scale. Wisdom stands above the whole scale.
- Uncertain — the stones are hard to identify, and commentators differ over whether the verse names pearl or crystal. The point of the list never rested on which stone is which.
- Unbought — nothing in nature comes near wisdom's value, because wisdom is spiritual, not natural. It comes through faith in Christ, by the Spirit.
- Unsought — men will overturn mountains for gold and will not work for wisdom. They do not know God, and wisdom starts with the fear of the Lord.
The topaz of Ethiopia shall not be compared to it, neither shall it be set in the balance with pure gold.
Job 28:19 closes a long auction: Job offers every treasure the ancient world knew, and none of it buys wisdom. He has just watched miners tunnel into the earth for gold and gems, and now he asks what all of it is worth next to wisdom.
Commentators read verses 15 to 19 as one list. Job weighs everything people call wealth against wisdom, and topaz is the last item he tries.
Something of such priceless value is now tested by all that man counts as treasure. Pure gold and silver, weighed out without limit, cannot buy it. The fine gold of Ophir, the precious onyx and the sapphire — a king's ransom — have no place here. Gold comes up again, along with transparent crystal — "pure gold, like transparent glass." These jewels are as beautiful as they are rare. Corals, pearls, rubies — wisdom's price is beyond them all. The topaz of far-off Ethiopia finds its shine dim beside this bright jewel of God's glory. Men search all of nature in vain for anything to compare with it. Its price is above every treasure on earth.
Job names one particular stone. One dictionary traces where its name came from and where else the stone appears in Scripture.
The Hebrew word is pitdah, and has been thought to come from an island in the Red Sea called Topazos. That would explain why the ancient versions call it 'topaz,' but the gem is thought to match our chrysolite. Job 28:19 speaks of 'the topaz of Ethiopia.' It was one of the jewels in the breastplate, Ex. 28:17; Ex. 39:10.
The first half of the chapter praises human skill. Men go where no bird can, and still come back without wisdom.
Man is in eager pursuit of what is rare in this world — a restless search after gold, silver and precious stones of every kind. But where is wisdom to be found? Man can steer his course across the waters. Man can cut a road through the rocks. He can level mountains and fill valleys to get what he wants. He can even go where the vulture does not fly and does not see... But where is wisdom to be found? The finest gold cannot buy it. The most precious gems and the finest works of art are no fair exchange. The treasures of the deep, even pearls, fail in comparison.
The list is not saying wisdom is expensive. It is saying wisdom is a different kind of thing, so no pile of treasure adds up to it.
Coral and quartz are not worth mentioning, nor rubies either, in estimating the value of wisdom, nor the topaz of Ethiopia, nor any pure gold (vv.18-19). In other words, absolutely nothing in nature can approach the value of true wisdom, for this is spiritual, not natural... 1 Corinthians 2:7 tells us, "But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the ages for our glory." We receive this wisdom only through faith in the Lord Jesus, when the Spirit of God reveals it.
Job's search ends with a strange line: destruction and death have heard a rumour of wisdom. One writer hears in that an advance whisper of the cross.
If wisdom is not in creation, where does it come from? Where is the place of understanding, since it is hidden from the eyes of all living? The answer comes back: "God understands its way." And "destruction and death" had heard the fame of it. This is surely a hint of the Cross of Christ. Yes, God knew the wisdom that was needed. When that "hidden wisdom" came out in Christ, and the world crucified the Lord of glory, then death and destruction heard its fame!
The chapter ends with God Himself speaking to man. One commentator ties this answer to what a person feels at conversion.
There is a wisdom above man. "And to man He said: 'Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding.'" And that is exactly what a soul feels at conversion. He may know nothing more than that; he sees how he has been in almost all evil, and he departs from it.
- Tested. Job weighs wisdom against gold, onyx, sapphire, crystal, coral, pearls, rubies and topaz. Every one of them comes up short.
- Dim. The topaz of Ethiopia, a gem set in the priest's breastplate, loses its shine next to wisdom.
- Mismatched. No price works. Wisdom is spiritual, not natural, so no amount of treasure ever turns into it.
- Whispered. Death and destruction had only heard the rumour of wisdom. One writer takes this as a hint of the cross, where the hidden wisdom of God came out in Christ.
- Given. What no mine yields and no gold buys, God tells man outright: fear the Lord, turn from evil. Commentators differ on how far this chapter points ahead to Christ. They agree the answer comes from God's side, not man's.
Whence then cometh wisdom? and where is the place of understanding?
Job has just described miners tunnelling into rock for silver, gold and sapphires, and now he asks his question again. The verses around it press two things at once: no created place holds wisdom, and someone does know where it is.
Job asked the same question in verse 12. Why ask it again?
But why speak of what all searching cannot find, or wealth cannot buy? The question of verse 12 is repeated, not hopelessly, but to show man how useless a merely natural search is. "From where, then, does wisdom come? And where is the place of understanding?" Nature does speak of wisdom, but it does not give it.
The verses before this describe real skill and real success. Yet what men bring up is ore.
"He binds the streams so they do not overflow, and the thing that is hidden he brings out to light. But where shall wisdom be found?" No, there is no wisdom in any of that. There is self in all of that. There is what will make a man rich. There is what will bring money and perhaps distinction. But where shall wisdom be found? And where is the place of understanding?
Job's list of human achievements was short by our standards.
They dig down, they divert the underground stream, they make paths that the strongest beasts and the sharpest-eyed birds have never walked. But in all this searching they never find wisdom... Men may discover much. Since Job's day they have discovered an immense amount more, but wisdom escapes them.
The verses just after this one say where wisdom is not.
Job knew there is such a thing as wisdom, and people generally realise that wisdom exists. But where? All man's searching does not find it: "it is hidden from the eyes of all living" and even "concealed from the birds of the air" (vv. 20-21)... "Destruction and death say, We have heard a report about it with our ears" (v. 22), but only a report. Wisdom itself comes only by God's direct revelation.
Why would death and destruction have heard of wisdom at all? One writer sees a pointer to the Cross here.
If creation does not hold it, where then does wisdom come from? Where is the place of understanding, seeing it is hidden from the eyes of all living? In answer, we are told, "God understands the way of it"; also that "destruction and death" had heard the fame of it. This is surely a hint of the Cross of Christ. Yes, God knew the wisdom that was needed. When that "hidden wisdom" came out in Christ, and the world crucified the Lord of glory, then death and destruction heard its fame!
There is a lesson here for the living.
How true it is that those who think about their own end are near to wisdom, ready to receive the revelation which God gives. This is the wisdom that comes down from above, and is given to the meek.
The chapter now turns from creation to God Himself.
We turn now from nature to its Author, from creation to God. He knows the way, and He alone can reveal it to man. And it is not merely God as Creator, but as Revealer in the person of His Son — "I am the way, and the truth, and the life."... He has seen wisdom; no, He is that Wisdom.
The search that began in a mineshaft ends with words God spoke to man.
God alone can declare its true nature and value. "And to man He said, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding."... So until God gets His rightful place in a person's mind and heart, he is unable to view anything wisely. His thoughts are off centre. His beginning is all wrong.
- Asked twice — The repeated question is not despair. It shows how useless a purely natural search is: nature speaks of wisdom but never gives it.
- Not in the mine — Human skill reaches where no bird or lion goes. It brings hidden things to light, but it turns up wealth and self, never wisdom.
- Not in any creature — Wisdom is hidden from the eyes of all living, and from the birds too. Death and destruction have only heard a report of it.
- Known to God — The chapter turns from creation to its Author. He knows the way, He alone reveals it, and He reveals it in His Son.
- Given to man — God speaks the answer Himself: fear the Lord and turn from evil. Until God has His rightful place, every other thought starts off centre.
For it is hidden from the eyes of all living, and concealed from the fowl of the heavens.
Job has just described how far human skill can reach: into mines, under mountains, through rock. Then he asks where wisdom itself lives. Verse 21 rules out two whole regions at once: every living eye on earth, and everything that flies above it.
The verse does not say wisdom is hard to find. It says it is hidden. One writer explains why even the richest searcher cannot buy it.
But while man is told to seek, this wisdom is not found in nature, nor by human effort. Where is wisdom found? Where does understanding live? Man, frail and mortal, does not know, and he does not have the price to pay for it, for it is not found in the land of the living. If it were within reach, some would be able to reach it; some rich man would have the price to pay for it. But it is beyond man... Nature, by itself, cannot give even one simple clue to this heavenly, this wonderful good.
Human skill gets into places no creature will go, and still comes back empty-handed.
Man can, no doubt, set his course across the waters. Man can cut a road through the rocks. In his eagerness for his own aims, man can level mountains and fill valleys. He can even go where the vulture never flies and never sees. He can break into places no wild beast ever enters... But where is wisdom to be found? The finest gold cannot buy it. The most precious gems and the finest works of art are no fair exchange for it.
The second half of the verse lifts the search above ground level and finds the same answer. Height is no advantage.
Job knew there is such a thing as wisdom, and most people realise that wisdom does exist. But where? All man's searching does not find it: "it is hidden from the eyes of all living" and even "concealed from the birds of the air" (vv. 20-21). The birds fly high above man, yet they have no understanding of it. Remember too that the birds of the air picture spirits, and the unclean birds stand for unclean spirits. God's wisdom is beyond what these can grasp. "Destruction and death say, We have heard a report about it with our ears" (v. 22), but only a report, for wisdom itself is known only when God reveals it.
If wisdom is missing from earth, sea and sky, that does not mean it does not exist. Its home is elsewhere.
What a very solemn thing that is! True wisdom and true understanding not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ; and Christ had not yet come; and further, this is what came out still more by Christ's rejection and Christ's death... "It is hidden from the eyes of all living and concealed from the birds of the air." It is not in the skies, as far as the eye can see them. "Destruction and death say, We have heard a report of it with our ears." Yes, that is just what happened. There was a report of that One who is Himself wisdom, and who is the Giver of wisdom to the meek. It was by death that it came to us, but they did not know it.
Another writer reads the faint rumour heard by death and destruction as pointing forward to the cross.
If it is not to be found in creation, where then does wisdom come from? and where is the place of understanding? seeing it is hidden from the eyes of all living. In answer, we are told, "God understands the way thereof"; also that "destruction and death" had heard the fame of it. This is surely an intimation of the cross of Christ. Yes, the necessary wisdom was known to God, and when that "hidden wisdom" came forth in Christ, and the world crucified the Lord of glory, then death and destruction heard its fame!
Verse 21 is not the end of the chapter. What no eye could find, God says plainly to man. His answer is short enough for anyone to remember.
"And he said to man" — there is a wisdom above man — "Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding." That is exactly what a soul feels when it is converted. He may know nothing more than that; he sees how he has been in almost all evil, and he departs from it. A real sight of Christ is enough to do that by the Spirit of God, and the fear of the Lord.
One writer gathers up every place the chapter has ruled out, and turns the search into a personal question.
The vulture's eye is keen, powerful and far-seeing, yet it has not seen it. The young lion is strong in movement and majestic in bearing, yet it has not walked there... The depth says, It is not in me, and the sea says, It is not with me. Gold and precious stones cannot buy it. All the wealth of the universe cannot equal it, and no cleverness of man can discover it. So where am I to turn? Where shall I find it?
- Search. Human skill reaches places no bird or beast will go, and still cannot find wisdom. Nature gives no clue.
- Sealed. The verse closes both directions at once. It is hidden from every living eye below and concealed from what flies above. Even creatures far above man have no grasp of it.
- Rumour. Death and destruction heard only a report. Wisdom itself is known only when God reveals it.
- Revealed. Wisdom is not on earth because it comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ, and it reached us by His death.
- Received. God does not keep the answer to Himself: the fear of the Lord is wisdom, and turning away from evil is understanding. Kelly says this is exactly what happens when a soul is converted.
Destruction and death say, We have heard its report with our ears.
Job's long speech turns from digging and buried gold to a harder search: where do you find wisdom? In verse 22 two voices from the world of the dead answer, and even they have only heard a rumour.
The chapter opens with men hard at work for gold, then sets that work beside something digging cannot reach.
The opening part of the chapter describes the hard work and care with which men dig for gold, which so often brings only the strife and curse that fall on it. He then moves on to the true riches — wisdom. Where can it be found? Searching earth or sea for it is useless, and all the wealth of the world cannot match it. Even the dark shadows of death can only witness that it exists. They do not tell how or where to get it.
Time has not changed the result.
Men may discover much, and since Job's day they have discovered far more, but wisdom escapes them. Suppose Job could see all that people do and discover in our atomic age. He would say the same thing, only a hundred times more strongly.
Older translations turn the name "Abaddon" into "Destruction." It appears in a small group of passages.
Revelation 9:11 shows this name to be the same as Apollyon, "the destroyer," whom it calls "the angel of the bottomless pit." It is perhaps not so much one of the names of Satan, as his character in person. It occurs six times in the Old Testament. Three times it goes with hell (sheol): Job 26:6; Proverbs 15:11; Proverbs 27:20. Once it goes with death: "Destruction and Death say," Job 28:22. Once it goes with the grave, Psalm 88:11. In all these passages, and in Job 31:12, it is translated "destruction."
Hearing about something is not the same as having it.
"Destruction and death say, We have heard a report about it with our ears" (v.22), but only a report, for God alone makes wisdom itself known, by direct revelation.
(Where the ESV reads "a rumor of it," older translations say "a report" or "the fame of it.")
What death takes away is itself a lesson.
Death and destruction cannot give positive wisdom. What they can show, from the other side, is that only what does not belong to mortal man has any value. A man sets up his family and keeps his name alive, but he himself is gone. Nothing stops the hand of death.
Ridout finds one more hint in the same silence.
Nature does speak of wisdom, but it does not pass wisdom on... And yet, if the poet had had ears to hear, those graves would at least whisper back a hint. The present life was not all, and wisdom lies beyond time. "Destruction and death say, We have heard the fame of it with our ears." How true it is that those who think about the end of their life are near to wisdom, ready to receive the revelation which God gives.
Two writers hear in that rumour the report of a Person.
True wisdom and true understanding are not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ; and Christ had not yet come... "Destruction and death say, We have heard the fame of it with our ears." Yes, it was just that very thing. There was a report of that One who is Himself wisdom, and who is the Giver of wisdom to the meek. It was by death that it came to us, but they did not know it.
Darby ties the same words to the death of Christ.
This is how death and destruction heard the fame of His wisdom: only God knows it (Job 28:22-23).
Only one voice can end the search.
God alone can declare its true nature and value, "and to man He said, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding."... So until God has His rightful place in a man's mind and heart, he cannot look at anything wisely. His thoughts are out of centre. His beginning is all wrong.
- Search. Men dig for gold and discover more in every age. Wisdom still stays out of reach.
- Rumour. Destruction and Death — Abaddon, "the destroyer" — have only heard a report. Wisdom itself comes by direct revelation from God.
- Warning. Death teaches nothing positive. It does show that only what does not belong to mortal man has value. Those who think about their own end stand nearest to wisdom.
- Report. Writers hear in that rumour a report of Christ, who is wisdom Himself. Wisdom came to us by way of death, and those who heard the report did not know it.
- Answer. God alone knows wisdom's place, and what He tells man is short: fear the Lord, turn from evil. Until He has His rightful place in a heart, every thought is off centre.
God understandeth the way thereof, and he knoweth its place
Job has just searched mine shafts and sea depths, and every place gives the same answer: wisdom is not here. Verse 23 is the turn: the search moves from creation to the Creator, from where man can go to what God alone knows.
One writer sums up why every search for wisdom comes up empty.
While man is told to seek, this wisdom is not found in nature, nor by human effort. The question is asked: Where is wisdom found? Where does understanding live? Man, frail mortal, does not know it and cannot pay its price, for it is not found in the land of the living. If it were within reach, then some would be able to attain it; some rich man would have the price to pay for it. But it is beyond man. In the bottomless deep, the call for wisdom wakes only one reply: "It is not in me." The wide sea, for all its size, does not hold this priceless treasure. Nature, in itself, is powerless to give even a simple clue to this heavenly, this wonderful good.
Read the preceding verses as a personal question and you feel the weight of this one. One writer puts himself in the place of the seeker:
If wisdom cannot be bought with gold or precious stones — if the wealth of the universe cannot equal it, and no cleverness of man can discover it — then where am I to turn? where shall I find it?
The verse says God knows both the "way" and the "place" of wisdom. One writer sets that knowledge beside the whole universe God governs.
If destruction and death can only say that they have heard its report, God understands its way and He knows its place. The universe in no degree distracts Him: He looks to the ends of the earth, He sees not only in but under the whole heaven. Nothing is too delicate or too vast for His knowledge and His rule. He gives the winds their weight and measures out the waters. He controls the rain and the lightning. Yet He also laid down the foundation of all righteousness, and this for man on earth to hear. It is to give God His rights.
after_note: DELETE
One writer follows the search from creation to its Author, and from the Author to a Person.
We turn now from nature to its Author, from creation to God. He knows the way, and He alone can reveal it to man. And it is not merely God as Creator, but as Revealer in the person of His Son — "I am the way, and the truth, and the life." … He has seen wisdom; no, He is that Wisdom.
Another writer reads the answer of verse 23 as reaching past creation into salvation itself.
Yes, in all His creation He knows the way. Much more so in redemption: He is, in the person of His blessed Son, the way to Himself, and in Him all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are hidden.
One writer turns to the person who leaves God out.
Until God gets His rightful place in a man's mind and heart, he is incapable of viewing anything wisely. His thoughts are out of centre. His beginning is all wrong.
One writer names the secret of wisdom, and what works against it.
Here, then, is the divine secret of wisdom: "the fear of the Lord." This sets the conscience directly in the presence of God, which is its only true place. Satan's aim is to keep the conscience out of this place. He works to bring it under the power and authority of man … He pushes something in between the conscience and the authority of Christ the Lord. It does not matter what it is. It may be a creed or a confession containing a quantity of truth — it may be the opinion of a man or a set of men — the judgment of some favourite teacher — anything, in short, that comes in and takes over, in the heart, the place that belongs to God's Word alone.
- Searched — Man digs and prices the whole earth. Nature cannot give even a simple clue to wisdom.
- Beyond reach — If wisdom could be bought, some rich man would already own it. It lies outside human effort.
- Known — God understands its way and knows its place. The universe never distracts Him, and nothing is too delicate or too vast for His rule.
- Revealed — He alone can give it. He does so not only as Creator but as Revealer in His Son, who holds all the treasures of wisdom.
- Feared — Wisdom starts when God has His rightful place. The conscience then stands before Him, ruled by His Word and nothing else.
For he looketh to the ends of the earth, he seeth under the whole heaven.
Job has just described men tunnelling into the earth for silver, gold and sapphires, then asked where wisdom is found. This verse says why God, not the miner, knows the answer: His gaze runs to the ends of the earth and takes in everything under the sky.
The verse opens with "For" — it explains the statement just before it, that God understands the way to wisdom. His knowledge rests on a range of vision no one else has.
"God understands its way and He knows its place" (v.23). So Job rises high above the speculations of men, who by nature have no idea of wisdom. God alone is the Source of wisdom. He understands it in absolute perfection. He is the One who has established "the ends of the earth" and takes in all that is "under the whole heaven," as no creature can (v.24).
The mining picture earlier in the chapter shows real skill and effort. Yet the hardest search in the wrong place still misses what matters most.
In his days people mined: it may have been a new pursuit then, whether for iron or copper, for gold or silver or gems. They dig down. They turn the underground stream aside. They open paths that the strongest beasts and the sharpest-eyed birds have never travelled. But in all this searching they never find wisdom… Men may discover much, and since Job's day they have discovered far more. But wisdom escapes them.
God's survey of the whole earth is not idle watching. The lines that follow show Him weighing wind and measuring water — a settled order in nature that people took centuries to notice.
"For he looks to the ends of the earth and sees everything under the heavens. When he gave to the wind its weight." Man discovered that the air has weight many hundreds — yes, some thousands — of years after that. The philosophers of that day never thought of it; they knew nothing about it… God "apportioned the waters by measure," so the sea is never too full, whatever comes.
The verse turns the reader away from the created world and towards its Author. He is more than the maker. He makes wisdom known — and He is Himself that wisdom.
We turn now from nature to its Author, from creation to God. He knows the way, and He alone can reveal it to man. He is not only God the Creator. He is God the Revealer in the person of His Son — "I am the way, and the truth, and the life."… His all-seeing eye sweeps the heavens. He has given its weight to the unseen air and its set proportions to the water. He sends the gentle rain, and with it He gives the lightning its path. He has seen wisdom; no — He is that Wisdom.
The passage does not leave wisdom out of reach. It ends with a word God speaks to man. That word decides whether a person can think straight about anything.
God alone can declare its true nature and value. He "said to man, 'Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding.'"… So until God gets His rightful place in a man's mind and heart, he cannot view anything wisely. His thoughts are off centre. His beginning is all wrong.
One writer traces how this first shows itself in a person's own life.
"And he said to man" — there is a wisdom above man — "Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding." That is exactly what a soul feels when it is converted. He may know nothing more than that. He sees how he has been in almost all evil, and he turns from it.
- Digging — men sink shafts and uncover buried treasure, yet wisdom is never among the finds. The effort is real; the direction is wrong.
- Looking — man digs downward; God looks outward, to the ends of the earth, and takes in everything under heaven. That limitless view is why He alone knows where wisdom lives.
- Weighing — the same look that sweeps the earth sets the weight of the wind and the measure of the waters. People only began to grasp that order thousands of years later.
- Revealing — God is not only the Creator behind that order. He reveals wisdom in His Son, who said, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life."
- Fearing — the search ends in a word spoken to man: fear the Lord and turn from evil. Until God has His place in a person's heart, every other thought is off centre.
In making a weight for the wind, and meting out the waters by measure,
Job 28 has been hunting for wisdom — in mines, in ocean depths, in gold and jewels — and no creature can name its price or its place. Verse 25 turns from the search to the Searcher: God weighs the wind and measures the seas.
Job speaks of the wind as something with weight. That claim sat in the text for centuries before anyone could test it.
"He looks to the ends of the earth, and sees under the whole heaven; to make the weight for the winds." It was many hundreds — yes, some thousands — of years later that man discovered the atmosphere has weight. It did not enter into the philosophy of the philosophers then; they knew nothing about it.
Air feels like nothing in the hand. The same air in motion can shatter rock.
It is wisdom far higher than man's conception that "established a weight for the wind" (v.25). Air weighs nothing. Yet the wind has such tremendous weight that it can break rocks in pieces (1 Kings 19:11). God also "apportions the water by measure." Who could even think of measuring the water of the oceans? Yet our great Creator holds all these things under perfect control. Such mighty works show wisdom, no less than power.
God does not only make the waters vast. He sets a limit and keeps it:
"He weighs the waters by measure," so that no matter what comes, the sea is never too full. The circle of waters is always going on. Waters rise up as vapour, and in vast quantities. The power of the sun acts on the waters, and many tons go up every day. There was a measure for it all, in God's mind.
That measuring reaches to the proportion of sea and dry ground, and life depends on the ratio being right.
The average height of land above water is 2,300 feet. The average depth of water is 13,000 feet. God in His wisdom planned the right proportion of land and water. This keeps the true balance of nature. With more land and less water, long drought would have followed. Farmers could not have grown good crops, cattle would have died for want of pasture and water, and the earth would have been scorched. With more water and less land, constant flooding would have been the result.
Weighing wind and measuring water assume a viewpoint that takes in everything at once — which is exactly what the previous verse claims for God, and for no one else.
"God understands its way and He knows its place" (v.23). So Job rises high above the speculations of men, who by nature have no idea of wisdom. God alone is the Source of wisdom. He understands it in absolute perfection — He who has established "the ends of the earth" and contemplates all that is "under the whole heaven," as no creature possibly can (v.24).
A person can study these weights and measures and still miss the One behind them.
How sad it is to see men of vast knowledge and deep reasoning powers. They gaze into the glorious heavens and fail to find God or wisdom there. They analyse the dust of the earth, yet do not perceive Him who "worked by weight and measure." The words of the apostle state the solemn fact: "the world did not know God through wisdom" (1 Corinthians 1:21). How blessed it is then to have the true wisdom — "Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God." We come to know Him through that cross, which sets aside all of man's pride, his wisdom and his righteousness.
The chapter does not stop at wind and water. The same God who fixed these quantities fixed something for people to live by.
He appointed the wind its weight — a remarkable thought and word for these days. He measured out the waters. He controls the rain and the lightning. Yet He also laid down the foundation of all righteousness, and this for favoured man on earth to hear. It is to give God His rights. "The fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding." It is to be subject morally to God as Master.
Ridout takes the further step of identifying that wisdom with a Person:
His all-seeing eye sweeps the heavens. He has given its weight to the invisible air, and its appointed proportions to the water. He sends the gentle rain, and with it gives a course to the lightning's flash. He has seen wisdom; no — He is that Wisdom.
- Weight. God gave weight to what feels weightless. The wind that breaks rocks was on His scales long before man could measure the air.
- Measure. God portions out the waters, so the sea is never too full. The ratio of land to ocean keeps the world from both drought and flood.
- Vantage. Such weighing needs an eye that sweeps the heavens and looks to the ends of the earth, under the whole heaven.
- Limit. Creation displays this wisdom but cannot hand it over. Men have analysed the dust and still missed the One who works by weight and measure.
- Landing. The God who fixed these quantities also laid the foundation of righteousness. Fear Him, turn from evil — and find that the Wisdom sought is Christ Himself.
Some quotations follow older English translations; the featured verse above is ESV.
In appointing a statute for the rain, and a way for the thunder's flash
This line sits inside a chapter asking one question: where can wisdom be found? Job answers by pointing to the God who fixes a rule for the rain and a path for the lightning.
The verse describes weather as legislation. Rain falls by rule — where, when, and how much — and lightning travels a set path. (The writer quotes a translation that reads "law" for the decree and "thunderbolt" for the lightning.)
"He made a law for the rain" (v.26) — a law fixing how and when God releases it, and exactly where. Man has no power at all to change that law. Nor does man understand why God holds back the rain at certain times and places. Nor does he understand why God sends too much rain at times and places of His own choosing. All of it follows the laws of nature that God has set up. "A path for the thunderbolt" shows that thunder is not random, but always under wise supervision. All of this declares God's wisdom (v.27). He prepared wisdom, He searched it out, and left no part of how it works without His fullest consideration.
The rain and the lightning follow two earlier measurements in the chapter: the weight of the wind and the measure of the waters. One of them took man thousands of years to catch up with.
It was many hundreds, yes, some thousands of years after Job's day when man discovered that the atmosphere had weight. It never entered the thinking of the philosophers of that time; they knew nothing about it. "He weighs the waters by measure," so that no matter what comes, the sea is never too full.
Rain and lightning stand together in this one line. That pairing matches how rain actually forms.
How accurate these ancient Scriptures are about science. They speak of vapours gathered from the ends of the earth — a worldwide area. They speak of the tendency of those vapours to rise. They speak of electrical discharge, which turns the vapour into many waters in the heavens. It is indeed most striking! People have often said that the Scriptures were not given to teach science; but when they do touch on science, they make no mistakes.
The list of weather is not there to teach meteorology. Size does not stretch God's attention thin, and detail does not scatter it. The hand that set these rules also laid down a moral rule, and told man about it.
The universe does not distract Him in the least. He looks to the ends of the earth. He sees not only in but under the whole heaven. Nothing is too fine or too vast for His view and rule. He gave the winds their weight — a remarkable thought and word for these days. He measured out the waters. He controlled the rain and the lightning. And He still laid down the foundation of all righteousness, and He did this for man on earth, whom He favoured, to hear.
The chapter opens with mining. Men dig to places no animal or bird has ever reached, and still come up empty on the one thing worth having.
They dig down, they divert the underground stream, they cut paths where the strongest beasts and the sharpest-eyed birds have never walked. But in all this searching they never find wisdom... Men may discover much, and since Job's day they have discovered a great deal more, but wisdom eludes them.
Two verses later the search ends with one short answer. It is not a fact about weather but a state of heart.
The only reason that wisdom eludes people is that "there is no fear of God before their eyes," so that they have no heart to depart from evil. The fear of the Lord is not terror, but a wholesome reverence that gives Him the place of supreme honour.
The same two marks appear at the very start of a changed life.
And that is exactly what a person feels when he is converted. He sees how he has been in almost all evil, and he departs from it. The fear of the Lord and departing from evil are what stay, even when souls are not taken up with their evil and talking about it.
- Law, not luck. God releases rain by decree, and thunder runs a supervised path; no part of the storm is loose or accidental.
- Law you cannot edit. Man has no power to change that decree, and no explanation for why drought falls here and flood there.
- Law observed late. Scripture named the weight of the wind. It linked electrical discharge to rainfall. Man measured neither until thousands of years later.
- Law that is moral too. The God who weighs the wind and measures the waters also laid down the foundation of all righteousness. He said it out loud for man to hear.
- Law that ends in reverence. Mining shafts reach what no bird has seen and still miss wisdom. It comes only to the person who gives God the place of supreme honour and turns from evil.
Then did he see it, and declare it; he established it, yea, and searched it out;
Job 28 watches men dig into the earth for silver, gold and gems, then asks what no mine can answer: where is wisdom found? Verse 27 answers from God's side, with four verbs for what He did with wisdom before any man looked for it.
The chapter has just searched every place men can reach and found nothing. One commentator shows how easily God knows what men cannot find:
Suppose it is hidden from the eyes of all living, and concealed from the birds of the heavens. Suppose destruction and death can only say that they have heard a report of it. God still understands its way, and He knows its place. The universe does not distract Him in the least. He looks to the ends of the earth. He sees not only in but under the whole heaven. Nothing is too delicate or too vast for His sight and His rule.
The verse opens with "then" — after God set the weight of the wind and measured out the waters. Each verb says something different. The strangest is the last: God searched out what He already had. Where the ESV has "established it," older translations read "prepared it," and the comment below follows that wording:
In all this God declares His wisdom (v.27). He prepared wisdom, He searched it out, leaving not one part of its working without the fullest consideration. Does this not fill our souls with wondering admiration?
What God saw and declared was not just an idea. He built it into the running of the sky. Job named things no one around him could measure:
"He weighs the waters by measure," so that no matter what comes, the sea is never too full. The circle of waters is always going on. Water rises as vapour in vast quantities, because the power of the sun acts on the waters. Many tons go up every day. There was a measure for it all, in God's mind.
The same writer points out how long it took man to catch up:
Man discovered that the atmosphere had weight many hundreds, yes, some thousands of years later. But it did not enter into the philosophy of the philosophers then; they knew nothing about it.
"Declared" means wisdom did not stay locked inside God's own thoughts. One commentator sees more here than knowledge — in redemption God Himself is the way:
"God understands the way to it." Yes, in all His creation He knows the way. Much more so in redemption: in the person of His blessed Son, He is the way to Himself. In Him all the treasures of wisdom and of knowledge are hidden.
Another commentator points to where wisdom does come from:
This is a very solemn thing! True wisdom and true understanding are not found in the earth at all! It comes down from heaven. It is found only in Christ.
God has done the searching. That leaves something practical for anyone who wants to walk with Him:
What an unspeakable mercy for someone who really wants to walk with God, to know that there is a way for him to walk in! God has prepared a pathway for His redeemed. In it they may walk with all possible certainty, calmness and steadiness.
The chapter ends with God's own word to man. One commentator links it to the moment a person turns to God:
"And He said to man" — there is a wisdom above man — "Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to turn away from evil is understanding." That is exactly what a soul feels at conversion. He may know nothing more than that. He sees how he has been in almost all evil, and he departs from it. A real sight of Christ is enough to do that, by the Spirit of God and the fear of the Lord.
- Saw — God saw wisdom first. The deep, the sea, the birds and death all come up empty, but nothing is too small or too vast for His sight.
- Declared — what God saw, He spoke out. One commentator finds the fullest declaring in His Son, in whom all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are hidden.
- Established — He built that wisdom into the weight of the wind and the measure of the waters. The sea is never too full.
- Searched — He also searched wisdom out, leaving no part of its working without the fullest consideration.
- Walked — the searching is finished. A path stands ready, and a person enters it by the fear of the Lord and turning from evil.
And unto man he said, Lo, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding.
Job has just described how far men will dig for treasure, only to ask where wisdom itself can be bought. The chapter ends with God Himself giving the answer, and it is not a thing men find but a way men live.
The chapter contrasts what human skill can reach with what it cannot. One writer notes that mining may have been a new skill in Job's day. Centuries of digging have not changed the result.
They dig down, they turn aside the underground stream, they cut paths that the strongest beasts have never walked and the sharpest-eyed birds have never seen. But in all this searching they never find wisdom... Men may discover much, and since Job's day they have discovered far more, but wisdom still escapes them. If Job could see all that people do and discover in our atomic age, he would say the same, only a hundred times more strongly.
Another writer names what drives the search:
There is no wisdom in all that. There is self in all that. There is what will make a man rich; there is what will bring money and perhaps distinction; but where shall wisdom be found?
Verse 28 opens with God speaking. Just before it He weighs the wind, measures the waters, and sets a law for the rain. The God who fixed those measures fixed this one too:
The universe does not distract Him at all. He looks to the ends of the earth, and He sees not only in but under the whole heaven. Nothing is too delicate or too vast for His sight and rule. He gives the wind its weight (surely a remarkable thought and word for these days). He measures out the waters. He controls the rain and the lightning. Yet just as truly He laid down the foundation of all righteousness, and this for man on earth to hear. It is to give God His rights... It is to be morally subject to God as Master, fearing Him and turning from evil — the true wisdom and understanding of man.
The phrase sounds at first like dread. The word behind "the Lord" here is Adonai, which means Sovereign Master. One writer sets out what this fear is not, and what it opens into:
The fear of the Lord (Adonai, the supreme Ruler and Master) is wisdom. It is bowing low in humility before Him, in whose presence seraphim cover their faces... This fear is not mere dread, but reverence, submission, worship. It includes repentance... To know God in this way prepares for, and includes, knowing His mercy and grace toward us — the full knowledge of the gospel. It is not knowledge of God, but being brought to Him, and learning His grace and love. This is more than mere knowledge; it is the key to it; it is eternal life.
Another writer explains why wisdom stays out of reach for most people:
Wisdom escapes people for one reason only: "there is no fear of God before their eyes." So they have no heart to turn from evil. The fear of the Lord is not terror, but a wholesome reverence that gives Him the place of supreme honour.
One writer sees the verse's second half at work from the very start of the Christian life:
That is exactly what a soul feels at conversion. He may know nothing more than that. He sees that he has been in almost every evil, and he turns away from it. A real sight of Christ is enough to do that by the Spirit of God, and the fear of the Lord. That is what lasts, even when souls are no longer taken up with their evil and talking about it — the fear of the Lord and turning from evil.
Job said this before he lived it. Another writer notes that the book itself will supply the demonstration: "In reverence and fear he then turns to Him, bowing in the dust; from evil, yes, from himself he turns."
One writer shows what this fear settles: who has the right to rule your conscience.
This sets the conscience directly in the presence of God, which is its only true place. Satan's aim is to keep the conscience out of this place — to bring it under the power and authority of man, to push something in between the conscience and the authority of Christ the Lord. It does not matter what it is. It may be a creed or a statement of faith with a great deal of truth in it. It may be the opinion of one man or of a group of men... God's Word must rule me — God's pure and simple Word, not man's explanation of it.
- Searched — Men tunnel where no bird flies to find gold, and still come up empty. Wisdom is not in the earth, and no money can buy it.
- Spoken — What man cannot mine, God announces. The God who weighs the wind also laid down the foundation of all righteousness for man to hear.
- Fear — Not terror, but reverence and submission before the supreme Master. It includes repentance, and it opens the way to His grace.
- Depart — Reverence shows itself by turning from evil. A soul feels this at conversion, and it lasts long after.
- Free — Fearing God puts the conscience straight before Him. No man, creed, or teacher may stand in between.
And Job continued his parable and said,
This verse opens the last speech Job makes, and it runs through chapters 29–31. Before he laments his ruin or protests his innocence, he looks back at better days.
Some translations say Job "continued his parable." That word does not always point to a story with a hidden meaning.
The Old Testament uses the word 'parable' many times for figurative language where no distinct parable is told. So Balaam 'took up his parable', Numbers 23:7, 18, and Job 'continued his parable', Job 27:1; Job 29:1.
This verse marks a fresh start, and what follows falls into three clear movements.
A fresh discourse of Job begins here, and it is his final one. It divides into the three chapters that follow. Each presents a distinct portion, and the whole is a very complete summary of the case as it now appeared to the sufferer's spirit. He looks back over his past life, when divine favour lavished on him every enjoyment an upright soul could desire on earth. That favour showed in the relief of the needy and distressed quite as much as in the honour he had from everyone who knew him. Then in Job 30 he contrasts his present degradation. He is an object of scorn even to the young, and has no comfort within. The bitterest part of his cup is that he cries to God and gets no answer, while God's strong hand puts him down. Yet in Job 31 he denies, with the utmost detail and solemnity, any awareness of secret sin.
Job is not speaking into empty air. His friend Eliphaz had accused him, and this chapter is the answer.
Eliphaz did not deal in vague hints. He stated Job's wrongdoing toward the needy, the naked, the weary, the hungry, the widow and the fatherless. In Job 29, Job answers these charges, and he is just as clear in declaring how well he had acted toward these very people.
Commentators see a warning in the direction Job is facing.
If we have to look back to the past for marks of God's favour, that is nearly always a sign of present weakness. It tends to go with pride in that past and discouragement in the present… The manna of yesterday will not do for today. The bright light of yesterday's candle is the burnt wick of today. A present Christ in all His fulness, and a present Spirit bringing the Word to our need — these are the believer's proper subject and business. So from the very start Job is looking in the wrong direction.
Looking back is not wrong in itself. The test is who gets the credit.
The words Job had spoken were wholesome words, but now he goes back to the old complaint of self-occupation, self-pity and self-vindication. Some twenty times he says 'I' in this chapter. Looking back is good if we do it with praise and humility. Not once does Job utter a word of praise. It is all spoken to remind his friends, as well as himself, what a great man he was. How often it happens with the Lord's servants that they live in the past and then nourish a most subtle pride.
Commentators point to this chapter to explain why Job lost everything.
Turn for a moment to Job 29. You will see plainly what a strong and deep root of self-satisfaction there was in the heart of this dear and valued servant of God. The very tokens of divine favour that surrounded him fed that root. This chapter is a moving lament over the faded light of other days. Its very tone and character prove how necessary it was that Job should lose everything, so that he might learn himself in the searching light of God's presence.
Job's account of himself is true. That is what makes the chapter so striking.
Job now gives his last speech — his greatest effort to justify himself. Read chapters 29–31, and you will say that if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man. There is not a man in your whole town who can say as much as Job said, and say it truly. As to his kindness to the poor, he was the very opposite of the lying charges brought against him. So he lets memory recount every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I — I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
- Resumed. The verse opens Job's final speech. Chapters 29–31 move from past greatness, to present shame, to a solemn protest of innocence.
- Provoked. He praises himself because Eliphaz had charged him with failing the needy, the hungry, the widow and the fatherless.
- Backward. Looking back for marks of God's favour signals present weakness. Yesterday's manna will not feed today.
- Unpraised. Memory is not the fault. Memory without praise is: Job recalls the gifts and never once praises the Giver.
- Restless. A true record of good works, recited as "I, I, I," still gives the troubled spirit no rest. That is why God stripped him bare.
Oh that I were as in months past, as in the days when +God preserved me;
Job has lost his children, his wealth, and his health. In his last long speech he turns from his friends back to the past. He wishes himself into the months when he knew God was watching over him — as if God were not watching now.
Job does not ask God to restore his circumstances. He asks to be what he once was. One writer points to the form of the wish:
Job now gives his last speech — his greatest effort to justify himself. Yes, this was the reason all his trial and sorrow were needed. His words are very touching. "Oh, that I were as in the months of old … as I was in my prime." It is not, Oh that it were with me, but, Oh that I was. How like the mistaken longings of a soul being driven from self to Christ. There is a peculiar, deceptive pleasure in being satisfied with oneself.
One commentator traces what those months held:
Job then sets before us a beautiful account of his earlier life. God shone on the days and months as they glided by. His lamp was above his head, and His light let him walk through darkness. He especially recalls the days of his harvest — the days of maturity, not youth. Then he enjoyed the familiar presence and counsel of God over his tent life.
Counting the pronouns in the chapter tells its own story:
This is truly a remarkable speech. We look in vain for any breathing of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. In this single chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while the references to God are only five.
Another writer ranks this chapter among the Bible's other "I" chapters:
Job 29 has become one of the great "I" chapters of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter. That pronoun occurs 16 times in the first 9 verses. It is the true chapter of the self-gratified "I". Job 29 is the chapter of the self-satisfied "I". Romans 7 is of course the chapter of the self-condemned "I". And to be self-condemned is far better than to be self-gratified or self-satisfied. Best of all is to be self-eclipsed, as we find Paul to be in Philippians 3.
No one in Job's day matched him for godliness. The trouble ran deeper than conduct:
Job was a godly man. There was no one like him in his generation. But in his soul a rapid current was flowing. Not that he was self-righteous or worldly in the usual sense. He was truly a believer, and a generous friend and benefactor. But he valued his circumstances in life, and his standing among men. In the hidden workings of his heart, he used to survey his fine condition with satisfaction. His neighbours had not traced the course of that stream, but his heavenly Father had. He loved him, and He wanted him to share His holiness. All this was inconsistent with that holiness, so He put him into His own school to exercise him.
Job speaks of God watching over him as something finished. That assumption is the flaw:
And so he looks back: "Oh, that I were as in the months of old." God was going to do far better. Job went through very severe sifting, but that was all for his good. … "When the Almighty was yet with me, when my children were about me." Was He not with him then? That is exactly what he did not see or know. "Whom He loves He chastens" — and that is one of the great lessons of the Book of Job. I admit it was terrible chastening. And that is where the friends were all wrong; it was so severe that they thought it was punishment.
Believers still speak this way about seasons of power they think have gone. One writer weighs that habit against the pattern Scripture sets:
It is disappointing that some Christians seem so satisfied when they speak of a power they knew in early years long past. They gravely tell us that it has now passed away. They are ready to cry out with Job, "Oh, that I were as in the months of old." All this is sad, since it helps neither themselves nor anyone who hears them. Job's experience was very different from that of the wise man who lived even earlier than Paul. That man declares that "the path of the righteous is like the light of dawn, which shines brighter and brighter until full day." As you come nearer to what you long for, the way grows brighter and brighter.
- Longing. Job's cry is not for his goods back but for himself back — the man he used to be.
- Lamp. What he misses is real: God's light over his head through years of maturity and abundance.
- Limelight. Over forty mentions of himself against five of God expose a heart satisfied with its own record.
- Love. God stripped him to chasten, not to punish. A Father who loved him would not leave him admiring himself.
- Light ahead. God was with him in the dark as much as in the bright days, and had far better ahead. The path of the righteous only grows brighter, so look forward, not back.
When his lamp shone over my head, [and] by his light I walked through darkness;
Job's friends have accused him of secret sin, so in chapter 29 he remembers what his life used to be — sheltered, guided, and lit by God Himself. The verse recalls God's nearness, yet a man sitting in the dark is describing light he no longer feels.
The image is of a lamp carried above a traveller, throwing light on the road ahead. One writer sums up the life that once lay under that light:
Job gives us a beautiful account of his earlier life. God shone on the days and months as they slipped by. His lamp stood above his head, and His light let him walk through darkness. He especially recalls the days of his harvest — his maturity, not his youth — when he enjoyed the familiar presence and counsel of God over his tent life.
Older translations call this lamp a "candle." The same word runs through the Old Testament, for real light and for light as a picture:
Used in the Old Testament for any light, either real or symbolic. Job said of God, "when his candle shined upon my head" (Job 29:3). Of the wicked it says, "the candle of the wicked shall be put out" (Proverbs 24:20). But of the wise woman it says, "her candle goes not out by night" (Proverbs 31:18).
(The ESV reads "lamp" where the older wording has "candle.") So Job is not just recalling comfort. He is describing the lamp that the wicked lose and the wise keep.
Job's darkness is real, but his eyes are behind him. One commentator treats that as a symptom, not just a mood:
It is nearly always a sign of present decline if we have to look back to the past for marks of God's favour. It usually goes with pride in that past and with discouragement in the present. In the things of God, we enjoy His personal favour. His lamp shines about us now. His blessing rests on our trouble, and the future opens sweetly before us — "we rejoice in hope of the glory of God." … The manna of yesterday will not do for today. The bright light of yesterday's candle is the burnt wick of today.
Another writer asks what all this looking back does to growth:
Now it is always a bad sign when people look back to dwell on the past. Are people not to grow? … No doubt it is very true that one is plucked out of the teeth of Satan; but what is that compared with the positive knowledge of God? … It is a sad thing when a person looks back on that rescue as the brightest of all things. Why, that means he has made no progress at all.
Job dates God's presence to a season that has ended. The same writer answers him:
"When the Almighty was yet with me, when my children were all around me." Was He not with him then? That is just what he did not see or know. "The Lord disciplines the one He loves" — and that is one of the great lessons of the Book of Job.
The proportions of Job's speech give him away:
This is truly a most remarkable thing to say. We look in vain for any sign of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no evidences of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find so much as a single expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In the course of this single chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while the references to God are only five.
Some believers speak of a power they once knew and now call gone. One writer sets the opposite hope against that:
Job's experience was very different from that of the wise man, who lived long before Paul. He declares that "the path of the righteous is like the light of dawn, which shines brighter and brighter until full day." And this is how it should be. As we come nearer to what we long for, the way grows brighter and brighter. However bright His presence made the past, I am nearer to Him now. So why should I long for the return of those days of shadow and darkness, days He once led me through?
- The lamp. God's light over Job's head guided him through dark roads. Scripture uses that lamp as a picture: it is put out for the wicked, but the wise woman's never goes out at night.
- The look backward. Looking to past favour for proof that God cares is a sign of present decline. It mixes pride in the past with discouragement in the present.
- The lamp is still lit. Job thought God's presence had ended. In fact God was with him in the chastening, for the Lord disciplines the one He loves.
- The lamp turned inward. Once Job dwells on old light, the chapter fills with himself — over forty mentions of "I" against five of God.
- The lamp ahead. The road ahead brightens, it does not dim. The path of the righteous shines brighter until full day, and we are nearer to Him now than at the start.
As I was in the days of my youth, when the secret counsel of +God was over my tent,
Near the end of a long argument with his friends, Job stops defending himself and remembers a better time. Why can a man who once walked with God now speak of that closeness only in the past tense?
The older wording "days of my youth" is not about being young. The ESV has "in my prime." One writer explains what the word points to:
Verse 4 says, word for word, "in the days of autumn." It does not point to the start of the civil year. It points to the rich time of harvest, of ripe maturity, when everything around him was prosperous. His children, as described in the first chapter, were around him, and he enjoyed his resources in full abundance.
Older versions read "the secret of God was upon my tabernacle." One writer borrows Job's words for Abraham, a man who lived in tents while God told him His ways:
He lived here with his children in tents, and died in faith, longing for a heavenly country... But God was clearly with him. His lamp, as Job puts it, shone on his head, and it is wonderful and blessed indeed that the secret of God was on his tent. This was all the glory he had now, but it was holy glory. The Lord told him of His ways, and promised him everything.
The speech did not come out of nowhere. Job's friend Eliphaz had accused him of specific cruelties, and Job answers by listing the opposite:
After these wise words, Eliphaz plunged into a series of accusations against Job. God Himself had spoken well of Job at the start of the story, so the charges must have been completely false... Eliphaz did not deal in vague hints. He stated Job's wrongdoing toward the needy, the naked, the weary, the hungry, the widow and the fatherless. In Job 29, Job answers these things, and he is just as plain in declaring how well he had acted toward these very people.
One writer turns Job's backward glance into a rule for any believer:
It is nearly always a sign of present weakness when we have to look back to the past for marks of God's favour. It usually goes with pride in that past, and with discouragement in the present... The manna of yesterday will not do for today. The bright light of yesterday's candle is the burnt wick of today. A present Christ in all His fulness, and a present Spirit ministering the Word to our need — these are the believer's proper theme and occupation. So Job, right at the start, is looking in the wrong direction.
Another writer traces how a soul gets there:
Sometimes under pressure I see more of the wisdom of God and His way. The more I see, the more depressed I become, if I cannot connect myself acceptably with God. So I turn back to my own history, and become taken up with myself. That is why Job in Job 29 dwells on the past. This is always evidence that the soul is not right with God. If it were going on with Him, it would have greater things than the past to tell.
Job mentions God in this verse, yet the balance of the whole speech tells its own story:
This is truly a most remarkable statement. We look in vain here for any sign of a broken and contrite spirit. There is no self-loathing, not even self-distrust, and not one word of conscious weakness and nothingness. In the course of this single chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while the references to God are only five.
Another writer ranks this kind of self-talk against others in Scripture, and points to something better than either:
Job 29 has become one of the great "I" chapters of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter... the chapter of the self-gratified "I." Job 29 is the chapter of the self-satisfied "I." Romans 7 is of course the chapter of the self-condemned "I." And to be self-condemned is far better than to be self-gratified or self-satisfied. Best of all is to be self-eclipsed, as we find Paul to be in Philippians 3.
One writer hears the same sigh in believers of his own day, and answers it:
Some Christians seem satisfied as they speak of a power they knew in years long past, and which, they gravely tell us, has now passed away. All this is sad, since it helps neither themselves nor anyone who hears them... "the path of the righteous is like the light of dawn, which shines brighter and brighter until full day." And surely this is as it should be. As we come nearer to the object of desire, the way becomes brighter and brighter. However bright the past was through His presence, I am nearer to Him now. So why should I miss those days of shadow and darkness, or long for them to come back — days He once led me through?
- Prime, not youth. The verse looks back to Job's best season — children around him, resources overflowing.
- Friendship. God's "secret" over a tent means God confiding His ways to a man, as He did with Abraham.
- Provocation. Eliphaz's false charges pushed Job into answering with a record of his own good deeds.
- Symptom. Needing the past to prove God's favour shows present weakness. A soul going on with God has newer things to tell.
- Direction. Job's "I" looks backward; the better path looks forward, growing brighter the nearer it gets.
When the Almighty was yet with me, my young men round about me;
Job is looking back at better days. He remembers God close by and his children around him — and that memory raises the question the whole book is built on: was God with him only while the children were alive?
Verse 4 fixes the time of this memory. One writer takes the word behind it literally.
Verse 4 literally says, "in the days of autumn." It does not mean the start of the civil year. It means the rich time of harvest, of ripe maturity, when everything around him was prosperous. His children, as the first chapter describes, were around him, and he took full delight in his abundant resources.
Another translation of the lines around verse 5 shows how near God felt to Job:
When His lamp shone over my head — / by His light I walked through darkness; / as I was in the days of the harvest, / when God's close friendship was over my tent; / while the Almighty was still with me, / my young ones around me.
Job names God's presence and his children in one breath. One writer shows what Job read into that.
His circumstances were so pleasant that he took them as evidence of God's presence with him. But now his children were gone. His home life was in ruins. Even his wife had been no help to him in his trouble (ch.19), though he does not even mention her.
If comfort proves God is near, then loss must prove He has left. One writer answers that directly.
"When the Almighty was yet with me, when my children were all around me." Was He not with him then? That is just what Job did not see or know. "Whom He loves He disciplines"; and that is one of the great lessons of the Book of Job. I admit it was terrible discipline. And that is where the friends were all wrong. It was so terrible that they thought it was punishment for sin. They thought no one could suffer that much unless he had been extremely wicked.
Verse 5 names God and Job's household together. One writer counted how often each appears in the chapter:
In this single chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while God is mentioned only five times. All the "I" reminds us of Romans 7. But there is an immense difference. In Romans 7, "I" is a poor, weak, good-for-nothing, wretched creature standing before the holy law of God. In Job 29, "I" is a most important and influential man, admired and almost worshipped by those around him.
The same writer looks at what was feeding that self-focus.
In Job 29 you can see clearly what a strong, deep root of self-satisfaction there was in the heart of this dear and valued servant of God. You can see how the very signs of God's favour all around Job fed that root.
Job's longing points backward. One writer treats that as a symptom, not just a sad mood.
If we have to look back to the past for marks of God's favour, it is almost always a sign that we are weak right now. It usually goes with pride in that past and with discouragement in the present. In the things of God, we enjoy His personal favour now. His lamp shines on us now. His blessing rests on our present trouble... Yesterday's manna will not do for today. The bright light of yesterday's candle is today's burnt wick.
Job had expected the good season to keep running.
Because Job's conduct had been a model to others, and he could be relied on, he felt quite sure that his prosperity would go on without a break... How differently things turned out! Do we also think we can lean on past experience to carry us into the future? If so, we forget that we depend on the grace of God at every moment.
- The season — Job mourns his autumn, his ripe maturity: a full house, a full harvest, God's friendship over his tent.
- Gift mistaken for Giver — Job read his easy circumstances as the proof that the Almighty was with him.
- Loss misread — when the children were gone, Job decided God had gone too. God was with him then, in the discipline he could not see.
- Gifts feeding self — the very signs of God's favour had been feeding a deep root of self-satisfaction in Job's heart.
- Facing the wrong way — yesterday's candle is today's burnt wick. God's lamp shines now, and we live on His present grace, not on past experience.
When my steps were bathed in milk, and the rock poured out beside me rivers of oil! ...
Job is remembering better days. He reaches for two pictures of plenty: milk so rich he could wash his feet in it, and oil pouring from hard rock. Commentators ask a sharper question than whether the picture is lovely. Why does a suffering man dwell on his own past like this, and what is he missing while he does?
The "butter" here is not what sits in a modern fridge. One reference work explains what the word meant on an ancient table:
This was curdled milk. Genesis 18:8; Deuteronomy 32:14. Jael brought Sisera "butter" to drink, Judges 5:25; and Job in Job 29:6 speaks of his steps being washed with butter when the Almighty was with him in prosperity. The promised land was to flow with milk and honey: compare Job 20:17. Curdled milk is a common drink in the East, and when mixed with honey is very pleasant.
The language is extravagant on purpose. Commentators agree the scene is a figure, not a literal description of Job's household.
Job treated his comfort as the proof that God was near. Notice what he counts, and who he leaves out:
His circumstances were so pleasant that he considered this as evidence of God's presence with him. But now his children were gone. His home life was all but destroyed, and even his wife had been no help to him in his trouble (ch. 19) — though he does not even mention her. But in contrast to his present circumstances, his steps were bathed with cream and he was figuratively blessed with "rivers of oil."
A man who can only find God's smile behind him has a problem in front of him:
It is nearly always a sign of present weakness if we are forced to look backward to the past for marks of God's favour. It tends to be joined with pride in that past, as well as with discouragement in the present. In the things of God, we enjoy His personal favour. His lamp shines about us now. His blessing rests on our trouble, and the future opens out before us — "we rejoice in hope of the glory of God." … The manna of yesterday will not do for today. The bright light of yesterday's candle is the burnt wick of today. … Job at the outset is looking in the wrong direction.
Read the whole chapter and a pattern shows up:
This is truly a most remarkable utterance. We look in vain for any breathings of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no evidences of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find so much as a single expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In the course of this single chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while the references to God are only five. It reminds us of Romans 7, where "I" also dominates. But there is a huge difference. In Romans 7, "I" is a poor, weak, good-for-nothing, wretched creature standing before God's holy law. In Job 29, "I" is a most important, influential person, admired and almost worshipped by those around him.
The complaint is not that Job's account was false. It is that a good man was savouring his own goodness:
He took pleasure in his good character. … Job did have great grace, and he did sustain a very admirable character; but why should he talk about it? why should he think upon it? why should he not think of the source of all the blessing? Why should he not be boasting in the Lord — instead of an implied boasting in himself? That was the very thing God had a controversy with.
So God's controversy was not with Job's record. It was with the quiet boast that the record fed.
What was pleasant to Job still looks pleasant to us. That is where the danger sits:
"When I washed my steps with butter" — of course it is not literal — "and the rock poured me out rivers of oil." … All that was exceedingly pleasant to Job. And we are apt to think so too. Nothing succeeds like success, men say. There is no more wicked saying, and none more completely opposed to God. Nothing denies more fully that our place now is one of suffering, of being despised and rejected for Christ's sake.
- Gift. Cream underfoot and oil from the rock picture overflowing plenty. It is the abundance of the promised land, not a literal scene.
- Confusion. Job read that abundance as proof that the Almighty was with him. When it went, his evidence went with it.
- Complacency. The gifts fed a root of self-satisfaction: more than forty mentions of himself in this chapter, five of God.
- Correction. God's controversy was not with Job's record but with the boast the record fed.
- Cure. Do not measure God's favour by yesterday's comfort or today's success. Yesterday's manna is stale. Look for His light now.
When I went out to the gate by the city, when I prepared my seat on the broadway,
Job is looking back over his old life. Here he leaves home in memory and walks into public life: out to the town gate, and down to his seat in the open square. The picture is a fine one. Yet commentators ask a hard question about it. Can a great man describe his own greatness and come away unharmed?
The town gate was where public business was handled. Job took his seat there as the chief man, and Grant weighs what such honour should do to the man who has it.
Now Job speaks of going out to the gate of the city, the place of public administration (v.7), and taking his seat there. His dignity was such that young men instinctively drew back, and old men stood up to honour him (v.8). The leading men would not speak first, for everyone waited for Job (vv.9-10)... Though these things might be perfectly true, he ought not to have dared to glory in such honour. In fact, the honour men give to us should only humble us to the dust.
No office gave Job this standing. Nobody appointed him, and Kelly says that is what made his influence weigh even more.
Honour did not fail him outside his own lands either. When he went from the gate up into the city and took his seat in the open square or market, young men hid themselves in awe. Old men rose and stayed standing until he sat down. Leading men and rulers said nothing and kept a respectful silence. The nobles and men of note, whose voices were usually heard, fell silent, unable to speak a word. Such was the reverence that met Job when he came among them — and his influence counted all the more because he held no office.
The problem in this chapter can be counted. Mackintosh looks for a humbled heart here and finds none.
This is truly a most remarkable statement. We look in vain for any breathing of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find so much as a single expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In the course of this one chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while the references to God are only five.
Ridout asks whether this pleasure in his own greatness is what God had to deal with in Job.
It is pitiful to hear a truly great man describing his supremacy over others. The young men hid themselves, the elders rose up and remained standing until he took his seat. Ah, had not this sense of his greatness fostered a pride in Job which made his downfall a necessary dealing of God? He was a prince of princes; nobles were struck dumb in his presence!
The scene is easy to admire. Kelly names the maxim hidden in that admiration.
All that was very pleasant to Job. And we are apt to think so too. There is nothing, men say, that succeeds like success. No maxim is more wicked, or more completely against God. Nothing denies more thoroughly that our place now is one of suffering, of being despised and rejected for Christ's sake.
Job's nobility was real. So Kelly puts the fault not in the honour itself but somewhere finer.
Now one of the beautiful features about Job was that he did not pretend to be noble, and he did not seek to be a prince... he was truly noble in his ways; and all that would have been admirable if he had not said or thought it; for that is the important point. "Do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing." It does not mean that other people do not know about it. The wrong is that our own left hand should know what our right hand does. That is, we ought not to think about it.
The next chapter answers this one. Mackintosh points to the two words that turn it.
Now Job had to lose all this. Compare Job 29 with Job 30, and we can form some idea of how painful that stripping must have been. There is a particular force in the words, "But now." Job draws a striking contrast between his past and his present... The very men who flattered him in the day of his prosperity treat him with contempt in the day of his trouble.
- Gate — The gate was the place of public business. Job's seat in the square marked him as the chief voice there.
- Honour — No office gave Job that standing, so his influence weighed even more. Young men hid themselves; old men stood until he sat.
- Counting — In this one chapter Job speaks of himself over forty times and of God five times. There is no note of a broken and contrite spirit.
- Thinking — The fault was not in doing good in public but in dwelling on it. The left hand should not know what the right hand does.
- Stripping — "But now" opens the next chapter. The men who flattered Job turn to contempt. Honour from men should only humble us to the dust.
The young men saw me, and hid themselves; and the aged arose [and] stood up;
Job is looking back. Stripped of everything, he recalls the day he walked out to the city gate, where young and old alike showed him respect. The question the chapter forces on us is not whether the memory is true, but why Job is the one telling it.
Job's memory moves out of his own household to the gate and the market square — a public scene, among the town's leading men. One writer describes what met him there, and what gave his presence such weight:
Nor did honour fail outside his own lands. If he went from the gate up to the city and took his seat in the market square, young men hid themselves in awe. The grey-headed rose and stood until he was seated. Leading men and rulers stopped speaking and kept a respectful silence. Those men of rank whose voices were usually heard fell quiet, their tongues sticking to the roof of their mouths. So great was the reverence that met Job's presence among them. It carried all the more weight because it was unofficial.
Nothing in the verse is false. The difficulty lies in whose mouth it comes from:
Job has looked back over his former prosperity at home. Now, in memory, he walks out of his gates to take his leading place among his fellows. It is pitiful to hear a truly great man describing his supremacy over others. He is describing his place among the councillors of the city; he was their president and chief.
The honour was real. What matters is what it does to the man who receives it:
If someone other than Job had said this, it would be impressive. But when Job speaks this way, he exposes the pride of his self-importance. That shows why it was necessary for God to bring him down. These things might be perfectly true, yet he should not have dared to glory in such honour. In fact, the honour men give us ought only to humble us to the dust. How good it is for every believer to take to heart the words of the Lord Jesus, "I do not receive honour from men" (John 5:41).
Note: John 5:41 is quoted here from an older translation.
One writer counted how often Job speaks of himself in this chapter:
This is a most remarkable speech. We look in vain for any breath of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. In this one chapter Job refers to himself more than forty times, while the references to God are only five.
His neighbours saw a generous man and honoured him for it. Something else was moving below that, and it explains why God dealt with him as He did:
Job was a godly man. There were none like him in his generation. But a fast current was flowing in his soul. He valued his character and his circumstances. Not that he was self-righteous or worldly in the usual way. He was truly a believer, and a generous friend and benefactor. But he valued his circumstances in life, and the esteem he had among men. In secret, in his own heart, he was in the habit of surveying his fine condition with satisfaction (Job 29). That was a strong undercurrent. His neighbours had not traced the course of that stream; but his heavenly Father had. He loved him, and He wanted him to share His holiness. All of this was inconsistent with that holiness. So He put him into His own school to train him.
The very next chapter opens with a hinge word, and the men in it treat Job in the exact reverse of this verse:
Now Job had to be stripped of all this; and when we compare Job 29 with Job 30 we can get some idea of how painful the stripping must have been. There is particular force in the words, "But now." Job draws a striking contrast between his past and his present. In Job 30 he is still occupied with himself. It is still "I" — but how changed! The very men who flattered him in the day of his prosperity treat him with contempt in the day of his trouble. So it always is in this false, deceitful world, and it is good to be made to prove it.
- Honour given. At the city gate young men stepped aside and the elders rose to their feet. The reverence was real, and it carried weight because Job held no official post.
- Honour hoarded. Job valued the esteem he had among men, and in secret he enjoyed surveying his fine condition. His neighbours never traced that undercurrent. His heavenly Father did.
- Honour exposed. More than forty references to himself, and five to God, in one chapter. The facts were true; the telling of them betrayed the man.
- Honour stripped. "But now" — the same world that stood up for him held him in contempt. It is good to be made to prove how false the world is.
- Honour refused. Honour from others should humble us to the dust, not lift us up. The Lord Jesus Himself said He does not receive honour from men.
Princes refrained from talking, and laid the hand on their mouth;
Job is looking back. He remembers the days when he walked into the city and the most powerful men there stopped mid-sentence. Commentators ask not whether the memory was true, but whether Job should have been reciting it.
The hush Job describes happened in public, at the city gate. One writer traces the scene and notes how far the reverence went beyond any office Job held:
If he went from the gate up to the city, and took his seat in the open square or market, youths hid themselves in awe, and the grey-headed rose and stood until he was seated. Leading men or rulers held back from speech and imposed a respectful silence on themselves. Those nobles or men of mark whose voices were usually heard fell quiet, their tongues sticking to the palate. So great was the reverence that greeted Job among them. His influence was all the stronger because it was unofficial.
None of this was invented. Job's three friends had known him in those years. That is what makes the speech uncomfortable:
What a prominent place he used to occupy, and the good works he did! The words need no further comment; what he means is on the surface. He glories in his good character and in his good works. Self is triumphant. His friends well knew that every word he spoke of his past greatness was true and not a lie.
So the problem lies not in the facts but in the reciting of them. One writer ties Job's fall directly to this speech:
Now Job speaks of going out to the gate of the city, the place of public business, and taking his seat there. Authorities would not take the lead in speaking, for everyone would wait upon Job. If someone other than Job had said this, it would be impressive, but when Job speaks this way, he exposes the pride of his self-importance in such a way as to reveal why it was necessary for God to bring him down. Though these things might be perfectly true, he still ought not to have dared to glory in such honour. Actually, the honour men give to us should only humble us to the dust.
One writer draws the line between Job's real worth and his mistake:
One of the beautiful features about Job was that he did not pretend to be noble, and he did not seek to be a prince. He was like a king in the nobility of his character — what a king ought to be. He was truly noble in his ways. All that would have been admirable if he had not said it or thought it. That is the important point.
There is a simple test for where Job's attention had settled:
This truly is a most remarkable statement. We look in vain for any breathings of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find so much as a single expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In this one chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while he mentions God only five times.
The men who once went quiet out of respect did not stay loyal. The next chapter turns the picture inside out:
Now Job had to be stripped of all this. Compare Job 29 with Job 30, and we can form some idea of how painful the stripping must have been. There is peculiar emphasis in the words, "But now." Job draws a most striking contrast between his past and his present. The very men who flattered him in the day of his prosperity treat him with contempt in the day of his adversity.
The gesture Job remembers in others he later makes himself. When God speaks, the silence is Job's:
Job had wished to come near His seat and plead his own cause. Here He was now, if Job could answer, in keeping with the boldness of his reproofs. The only answer he makes is to admit he is vile. He had no reply to the divine challenge beyond the confession implied in laying his hand on his mouth. Once he had spoken, but he would not reply; twice, but he would add no more. Now he sees the folly of refusing to submit. He had spoken too much, so silence suited him. It was for the LORD to speak.
- Hand on mouth (theirs). At the city gate, rulers held back their words and nobles fell silent. They honoured a man whose weight came from his character, not from any office.
- True, and still wrong. Every claim Job makes was accurate, and his friends knew it; the fault lay in saying it and dwelling on it, not in the facts.
- Forty to five. In one chapter Job speaks of himself over forty times and of God five times. The honour of men had replaced God as his subject.
- Praise that emptied. The men who flattered him when he prospered mocked him when he was ruined. Such honour is not worth holding.
- Hand on mouth (his). Princes once fell silent before Job. In the end Job falls silent before God, with nothing left to say for himself.
The voice of the nobles was hushed, and their tongue cleaved to their palate.
Job remembers walking into the city gate. The leading men stopped talking — not because he held any office, but out of respect for the man himself. It is a memory of honour at its height, and the commentators ask the harder question behind it: why did God take all this away?
The nobles are the men of rank who normally did the talking. One writer sets their silence inside the wider scene at the gate:
When he went from the gate up into the city and took his seat in the open square, young men hid themselves in awe. Grey-headed men rose and stood until he sat down. Leading men and rulers held back from speaking and kept a respectful silence. The nobles and men of note, who usually did the talking, went quiet, their tongue sticking to the roof of their mouth. Such was the reverence that met Job among them — and his influence was all the greater because he held no office.
Every detail of it was true. The problem is not the facts but the mouth they come out of:
Job now, in memory, passes out of his gates to take his leading place among his fellows. It is pitiful to hear a truly great man describing his supremacy over others. The young men hid themselves, the elders rose up and remained standing until he took his seat. Had not this sense of his greatness fostered a pride in Job which made his downfall a necessary dealing of God? He was a prince of princes; nobles were struck dumb in his presence! He is describing his place among the councillors of the city; he was their president and chief.
Another writer says what honour from others should do to the person who receives it:
Authorities would not take the lead in speaking, for everyone would wait on Job. Though these things might be true, he ought not to have dared to boast in such honour. The honour men give to us should only humble us to the dust.
One writer counted how often Job speaks of himself here, then looked at what became of the crowd that admired him:
We look in vain for any breathings of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. In this one chapter Job refers to himself more than forty times. He mentions God only five times. It reminds us of Romans 7, where "I" dominates in the same way. But there is this immense difference. In Romans 7 "I" is a poor, weak, good-for-nothing, wretched creature standing before the holy law of God. In Job 29 "I" is a most important and influential figure, admired and almost worshipped by his fellow men. Now Job had to be stripped of all this. The very men who flattered him in the day of his prosperity treated him with contempt in the day of his adversity.
Job never chased the honour that came to him. The fault lay further in, in what he did with the memory of it:
One of the beautiful features about Job was that he did not pretend to be noble, and he did not seek to be a prince. He was like a king in the nobility of his character — what a king ought to be. He was noble in his ways. All of it would have been admirable if he had not said it or thought it. That is the important point. "Do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing." That does not mean other people do not know about it. The wrong is that our left hand should know what our right hand does — that is, we ought not to think about it.
Later the picture turns around. The man before whom nobles could not speak finds he has nothing to say:
How was Job's mouth stopped? Through long chapters in his book he argues out his own righteousness. He boasted that he was eyes to the blind, feet to the lame, and a father to the poor. He boasted that he made the widow's heart sing, and that he put on righteousness as a garment and justice as a crown. And it was no idle boast. At last he comes into God's presence and says, "Behold, I am of small account; what shall I answer you? I lay my hand on my mouth." In God's presence his mouth is stopped.
- Silence given. At the city gate the nobles went quiet and their tongues stuck fast. The respect was for the man, not for any office.
- Silence deserved. The record was true: Job really had been eyes to the blind, feet to the lame, a father to the poor.
- Silence savoured. The trouble was that he replayed it; forty mentions of himself in one chapter against five of God.
- Silence unlearned. The lesson he needed was the hidden right hand — good done and then not thought about again.
- Silence returned. The man before whom nobles could not speak ends with his own hand over his own mouth, in God's presence.
When the ear heard [me], then it blessed me, and when the eye saw [me], it gave witness to me;
Job is deep in suffering. He looks back to the days when the world thought much of him. His own report of that reputation raises two questions. Was it true? And was it right for him to make it?
One writer says the ear and the eye belong to the people Job had rescued. He hears in Job's words a man who enjoyed being thought so much of.
Job was highly pleased, and took great pleasure in the world thinking so much of him. "When the ear heard, it called me blessed" — now he is looking at what you may call the objects of his kindness and love. For there was both kindness and love in Job. "And when the eye saw, it approved." He was referring to the people who had been helped out of their many troubles... God delighted in Job; that was all right; and he found at last that God did delight in him, but he did not find that until after the trial. The homage people paid him, and the sense of his own great kindness, lifted him above the ordinary occupations of men. All that lifted him up. Well, that is a very natural thing; but it is not spiritual; and it is the very thing that God was putting down severely in him.
Older translations end the verse "it gave witness to me."
The praise had a cause. The people Job lifted out of trouble did not forget him.
The people he helped were moved whenever they saw or heard the man who had rescued them, even though his left hand did not know what his right had done. God does not let the memory of unselfish goodness die. The poor can give as true a witness to loving-kindness as the rich can to a greatness beyond their own. And was not Job the deliverer of the poor, the orphan, the perishing, and the widow?
Job did not begin this speech unprovoked. His friend Eliphaz had accused him of exactly the cruelties this chapter denies.
Eliphaz had just spoken wise words. Then he plunged into a series of accusations against Job. God had given His own testimony about Job at the start of the story, so these charges must have been completely unfounded. Reading them, we can see what provoked Job to sing his own praises, as he does in Job 29. Eliphaz did not deal in vague hints but stated Job's wrongdoing towards the needy, the naked, the weary, the hungry, the widow and the fatherless. In Job 29 Job answers these charges and is just as explicit in declaring how well he had acted towards these very people.
Everything Job claims here is true. What spoils it is that he says it himself. One writer takes the rule about the left hand further than keeping a deed secret from others.
One beautiful thing about Job was that he did not pretend to be noble, and he did not seek to be a prince. He was like a king in the nobility of his character — what a king ought to be. He was truly noble in his ways. All that would have been admirable if he had not said it or thought it. That is the important point. "Do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing." It does not mean that other people do not know about it. The wrong is that our left hand should know what our right hand does. We ought not to think about it. It is done to God.
Another writer names who should have done the praising.
It is indeed a beautiful picture, but spoiled by the pride of personal recital. "Let another praise you, and not your own mouth."
Read the whole speech and one word dominates.
Job 29 has become one of the great "I" chapters of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter. That pronoun occurs 16 times in the first 9 verses. It is the true chapter of the self-gratified "I." Job 29 is the chapter of the self-satisfied "I." Romans 7 is of course the chapter of the self-condemned "I." And to be self-condemned is far better than to be self-gratified or self-satisfied. Best of all is to be self-eclipsed, as we find Paul to be in Philippians 3, where he mentions "I" a good many times.
The book does not leave Job here. Job's eye ends up on God instead of on himself.
That will not do, says God. That is all I, I, I. So He lets the devil loose on him, until Job curses the day he was born. But at last he says, "now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself." That will do, says God; now I can bless you. And He did bless him.
- True eye — the ear and the eye belong to the poor Job had rescued. They praised a real kindness, and God does not let the memory of unselfish goodness die.
- Provoked eye — Eliphaz's false charges about the widow and the fatherless pushed Job into listing his own good deeds.
- Watching eye — the fault is not the kindness but the telling of it. "Let another praise you, and not your own mouth." Better still, do not think about it yourself.
- Self-filled eye — Job 29 is the chapter of the self-satisfied "I." The self-condemned "I" of Romans 7 is far better. Best of all is the self-eclipsed Paul of Philippians 3.
- Opened eye — the trial ends when Job's eye moves off himself onto God. "Now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself." Only then can God bless him.
For I delivered the afflicted that cried, and the fatherless who had no helper.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
The blessing of him that was perishing came upon me, and I caused the widow's heart to sing for joy.
Job is looking back at his best years, and what he remembers is not his wealth but the people he rescued. The good he did was real — so why did God still have to deal with him?
One writer sums up who Job helped, and who could speak for him.
What distress ever sought his help in vain? What story of grief did he brush aside? What sight of misery did he forget? The people he helped were moved when they saw him or heard him, even if his left hand did not know what his right had done. God does not let the memory of unselfish goodness die. The poor can bear as true a witness to loving-kindness as the rich can to a greatness beyond their own. And was not Job the deliverer of the poor, the orphan, the perishing, and the widow?
Job told the truth about himself. One writer asks where that goodness came from, and what Job then did with it.
I suppose that everything Job said about himself was true. It was the effect of the grace of God in him; it did not belong to him naturally. And God, in the middle of His dealings with him and by those dealings, was letting him feel this. He recounted his good deeds, dwelt on them, and called them to mind. He recited them to his friends, who did not want to hear them… He seeks to adorn himself with his good deeds.
The deeds were right. One writer asks what went on in Job's heart as he listed them.
Job had acted well, for grace had acted in him; but he did not know himself before God. So he speaks: "When the ear heard, it called me blessed… I caused the widow's heart to sing for joy…" All very right and gracious. But was that all that was in Job's heart? What did thinking about it produce there? What did it show?
There is a simple test of this speech: count how often Job names himself, and how often he names God.
This is a most remarkable statement. We look in vain for any breathing of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find even one expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In this one chapter Job refers to himself more than forty times. He mentions God only five times.
The saying about the left hand and the right hand is usually read as a rule about keeping giving quiet. One writer reads it as a rule about memory instead.
"Do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing." It does not mean that other people should not know about it. The wrong is that our left hand should know what our right hand does — that is, we ought not to think about it. We do it to God. We are only paying back a very little interest on the wonderful capital — the spiritual capital — that the Lord has put in our hands.
Job's position in life never made him proud or careless about others. One writer finds the problem somewhere else.
His condition in life did not make him proud, or self-indulgent, or indifferent to others. But he valued his condition… He loved his condition and circumstances in life — his place, his character, the respect people gave him, his honours and the praise of men. He was godly, truly and admirably so. There was none like him on the earth. But his place on the earth mattered to him. He was very ready to share and to serve, but he shared and served as a patron or a benefactor.
One writer sets this chapter beside Romans 7 and Philippians 3, and ranks the ways "I" can fill a life.
Job 29 has become one of the great "I" chapters of the Bible… Job 29 is the chapter of the self-satisfied "I." Romans 7 is the chapter of the self-condemned "I." To be self-condemned is far better than to be self-gratified or self-satisfied. Best of all is to be self-eclipsed, as we find Paul to be in Philippians 3, where he mentions "I" a good many times.
- Real. The dying blessed him and the widow sang. Job really was the deliverer of the poor, the orphan and the widow.
- Given. The good in him was the grace of God at work. It did not belong to him naturally.
- Recited. The fault was not the doing but the dwelling — the left hand knowing what the right hand had done.
- Counted. He names himself more than forty times in this chapter, and God only five. The count shows what the speech is about.
- Eclipsed. To be self-condemned is far better than to be self-satisfied. Best of all is to be self-eclipsed, as Paul was.
I put on righteousness, and it clothed me; my justice was as a mantle and a turban.
Job looks back on his best years and pictures his own goodness as clothing he put on. Every word of it was true, so why does the same speech end with him saying, "I abhor myself"?
Job was not exaggerating. His record of kindness was real. But see where the long defence of it ends.
How was Job's mouth stopped? Through long chapters in his book he argues out his own righteousness. He boasted that he was eyes to the blind, feet to the lame, and a father to the poor. He made the widow's heart sing, he said, and put on righteousness as a garment and judgment as a crown. And it was no idle boast. At last he comes into God's presence and says, "Behold, I am vile; what shall I answer You? I will lay my hand on my mouth." In God's presence his mouth is stopped.
A dictionary of Bible words explains the head-dress named in this verse.
Imperial crown or crown of honour.
So Job is not only saying that he acted justly. He is describing how he looked to himself. One writer finds it hard to hear a man praise himself like this.
It is indeed a beautiful picture, but marred by the pride of personal recital... Job had won the respect and affection of all. He had been a helper of the helpless, a friend of the orphan and the widow. He clothes himself with righteousness as with a garment, and binds it as a crown on his brow. These are strong words, with little of the humility that suits us.
Job's uprightness was real. The fault lay in what he did with it.
Job was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That clearly proves he had never really been in God's presence. The result was this. He reasoned more correctly than his friends. His heart felt far more than theirs did what God was. Yet he charged God with injustice, and with wanting to trouble him without cause... God was bringing him to say, "Now my eye sees You, and I abhor myself."
Job's friends had accused him of hypocrisy. He was right to deny it — but being right about that settles less than he assumed.
This "righteousness," as Job 29 shows us, had to do with his outward conduct. The searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not. But outward correctness does not by itself count for righteousness in God's presence.
The trouble is not only in what Job says but in where his eyes are fixed while he says it.
Everything he said may have been true, and we have no reason to doubt that he meant it. Even so, it does not suit a man to dwell on his own state. Before the fall, man's happiness was to continue in God's goodness. When he turned from that, he fell into disobedience. For a sinner to dwell on his own goodness — and he has none — is repulsive. When a child of God does the same, it shows clearly that he has not yet learned his lesson.
Scripture has its own version of this image, and the difference is who does the dressing.
Here let us notice an important distinction. In Zechariah 3:4 iniquities are called "filthy garments." In Isaiah 61:10 righteousnesses are described as "filthy rags." Garments cover us. Rags are things men try to cover themselves with, but in vain. Our iniquities do cover us... But when we foolishly try to cover our nakedness with works of our own, we put on nothing but tatters. In reality they do not cover us at all. But God puts on the returning son "the best robe," and that is Christ. As He is, so are we in God's sight from now on and for ever.
(The "filthy rags" wording is from an older translation. The ESV reads "a polluted garment" at Isaiah 64:6.)
- True — Job's account of his justice and mercy was accurate. It was no idle boast.
- Worn — He speaks of his goodness as clothing and as a crown of honour. He had been looking at himself, and he liked what he saw.
- Claimed — He moved from being upright to making his uprightness his righteousness. That move showed he had not yet stood in God's presence.
- Not enough — Outward correctness is real, but it does not count as righteousness before God.
- Given — The robe that covers is the one God puts on us. It is the best robe, and it is Christ.
I was eyes to the blind, and feet was I to the lame;
Job is looking back at his best days and listing the good he once did. Verse 15 names two of those good things, and the whole book presses one question: why did such a record leave him with no peace?
The picture is of a man who made the weakness of others his own responsibility. One commentator gathers the whole scene in a single sweep:
What distress had ever sought his help in vain? What tale of sorrow had he ever ignored? What sight of misery had he forgotten? Those he helped were moved whenever they saw or heard their benefactor, even if his left hand did not know what his right had done. God does not let the memory of unselfish goodness die. The poor can give as true a witness to loving-kindness as the rich can to a greatness beyond their own. Was not Job the deliverer of the poor, the orphan, the perishing, and the widow? … He was eyes to the man who had none, feet to the lame, and a father to the needy. He spared no effort to look into a case he knew nothing about.
Nobody in the book contradicts Job's account of himself. Commentators are agreed that his record was accurate, and one states it bluntly before going on to show where it failed him:
He boasted that he was eyes to the blind, feet to the lame, a father to the poor, that he caused the widow's heart to sing, and put on righteousness as a garment, judgment as a crown. And it was no idle boast.
Where did a life like that come from? One writer traces it back past Job himself, and then names what Job still lacked:
Job had acted well, for grace had acted in him; but he did not know himself before God. … All very right and gracious; but was it all that was in Job's heart? What did the thinking of it produce there? What did it show?
The trouble is not the kindness. It is the pleasure Job takes in remembering it. One commentator names the thing God had against him:
He took pleasure in his good character. He was therefore in spirit too much of a Pharisee. "I thank you that I am not like other men." There really was great grace in Job, and he really did keep up an admirable character. But why should he talk about it? Why should he think about it? Why should he not think of the source of all the blessing? Why should he not be boasting in the Lord — instead of an implied boasting in himself? That was the very thing God had a controversy with.
So the verse carries a warning for anyone who serves the helpless well. One writer draws the lesson straight from Job's example:
The Lord Jesus said, "do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing" (Matt. 6:3). Job badly needed to learn that lesson. There is never a reason that we should advertise the good things that we do. If we do it "unto the Lord" — and that should always be the case — then He knows it. He weighs its value far more accurately than we could.
Serving people who cannot see or walk is more than kindness. It matches God's own heart. One writer shows which people God singles out:
It is always so in the Scriptures: those who are lonely, sorrowful, or oppressed are the special objects of His tender mercy… We can learn from such a scripture. It teaches us how to have practical fellowship with the heart of God. If we would walk with Him, His interests and His aims must be ours too. So a field of service opens to God's people — a field that has no limit and surrounds us on every side.
Job's defence runs on for three chapters and settles nothing. What finally quiets him is not a better argument but a meeting:
Through long chapters in his book he argues out his own righteousness… At last he comes into God's presence and says, "Behold, I am of small account; what shall I answer you? I lay my hand on my mouth." In God's presence his mouth is stopped.
(Older translations read "Behold, I am vile.")
- Real — Job really did serve as sight and strength for people who had neither. No one in the book denies it.
- Given — the kindness came from grace working in him, not from resources of his own.
- Wide — the blind, the lame, the orphan and the widow are God's special care. Serving them is fellowship with His heart.
- Spoiled — telling the story spoiled the good; the left hand was never meant to know.
- Silenced — a flawless record of good deeds gave him no rest; only God's presence ended the argument.
I was a father to the needy, and the cause which I knew not I searched out;
Job has lost everything, and his friends accuse him of crushing the weak. Here he remembers the days when the helpless ran to him — a record of goodness that still gave him no peace.
This verse is one line in a long list of kindnesses Job recites. One writer asks what became of the people who brought Job their trouble:
What distress had ever sought his help in vain? What tale of sorrow was ever brushed aside? What sight of misery was ever forgotten? Those he helped could not see or hear him without being moved, even if his left hand did not know what his right hand had done. God does not let the memory of unselfish goodness die. The poor can bear as true a witness to loving-kindness as the rich can to a greatness beyond their own.
The chapter opens with the respect people paid Job. One writer traces that respect back to something other than his rank:
People did not honour Job only for his high position. It was his consistent kindness toward others... He was zealous for the cause of righteousness and justice (v.14), and was in effect "eyes to the blind and feet to the lame" (v.15). He was in practice "a father to the needy," searching out the truth of a case that might not be easily apparent (v.16). He opposed the wicked. He broke their fangs — their power to gain by oppression — and rescued the victims from their clutches (v.17).
Nothing in the verse is false. Job really did these things. But one writer, quoting this very passage, finds the trouble somewhere else:
Now Job needed, and God saw that he needed, this. He was gracious and pious, but he did not know himself. He had never seen God in a way that brought him to a real knowledge of himself in His presence... All very right and gracious; but was it all that was in Job's heart? What did the thinking of it produce there? What did it show?
The problem is not the kindness but the pleasure Job took in telling it. One writer presses the question:
There was great grace in Job, and he did keep up a very admirable character. But why should he talk about it? Why should he dwell on it? Why should he not think of the source of all the blessing? Why should he not be boasting in the Lord — instead of an implied boasting in himself? That was the very thing that God had a controversy with.
Job's defence is the strongest case for a life of good works that any person could make — and it still fails to settle him:
Now, just read chapters 29-31, and you will say, if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man. There is not a man in all your town that can say as much as Job said, and say it truly. As to his kindness to the poor, he was the very opposite of the lying charges brought against him. So he lets memory recount every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I, I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
The deeds were right. The question is what we do with them afterwards:
We are never called to show our good works, or even to be conscious of them. The Lord's lesson about giving to the poor is the perfect example of the rule for all such things: "do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing." We may be sure He is not teaching a contradictory principle here. He takes it for granted that there will be good works: true faith in Him is sure to bear fruit. But faith is the very opposite of being taken up with self, and certainly the opposite of self-satisfaction.
- Search. Being a father to the needy meant more than money. Job searched out the truth of a case that was not obvious.
- Reach. He was eyes to the blind and feet to the lame. He also broke the power of those who preyed on the weak.
- Honour. People respected him for steady kindness, not for his position. God does not let the memory of unselfish goodness die.
- Blind spot. The deeds were real, and grace produced them. What Job lacked was knowledge of himself before God. His pleasure in telling it was the very thing God had a controversy with.
- Rest. The best record of good works anyone could recite gave his troubled spirit no rest. Real faith bears fruit without keeping count.
And I broke the jaws of the unrighteous, and plucked the spoil out of his teeth.
Job is looking back. He lists the good he did in his best days. The last item on that list is not gentleness but force. He broke an oppressor's teeth and made him give up what he had seized.
The words picture the wicked man as an animal with prey already in its teeth. One writer sums up what Job did about such men.
He opposed the wicked. He broke their fangs — their power to profit by oppression — and rescued their victims from their grip.
Job is not speaking into empty air. His friend Eliphaz had accused him of the opposite — of mistreating the helpless. The list in this chapter is Job's reply, point by point.
After these wise words, Eliphaz launched into a series of accusations against Job. God's own testimony about Job at the start of the story shows they must have been completely false. Reading them, we can see what pushed Job to sing his own praises, as he does in Job 29. Eliphaz did not deal in vague hints. He stated plainly that Job had wronged the needy, the naked, the weary, the hungry, the widow and the fatherless. In Job 29, Job answers these charges, and he is just as plain in declaring how well he had treated these very people.
The rescues were real, and God did delight in Job. The harm lay in what the praise did to him.
He was pointing to the people he had helped out of their many troubles. And that was really true. God delighted in Job; that was all right. He found at last that God did delight in him, but he did not find that out until after the trial. The honour people paid him, and his sense of his own great kindness, raised him above the ordinary business of other men. All that lifted him up. Well, that is a very natural thing. But it is not spiritual, and it is the very thing that God was firmly putting down in him.
Rescuing the prey from the oppressor was right. Filing it away as a credit was not. One writer applies the words of Jesus about the left hand and the right hand to precisely this.
One of the beautiful things about Job was that he did not pretend to be noble, and he did not try to be a prince. He was like a king in the nobility of his character — what a king ought to be. He was truly noble in his ways. All that would have been admirable if he had not said it or thought it. That is the important point. "Do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing." It does not mean that other people must not know. The wrong is that our own left hand should know what our right hand does — that is, we ought not to think about it. The deed is done to God. It is only a little interest paid back on the wonderful spiritual capital that the Lord has put in our hands.
Job's defence is true as far as it goes. But it stays on the level of outward behaviour, and one writer shows why that is not far enough.
This "righteousness," as Job 29 shows us, was about his outward conduct. The searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. He had been accused of being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We know he was not either. But outward correctness does not in itself count as righteousness in the presence of God.
Read the whole chapter and one word dominates it. Count how often Job says it.
This is a truly remarkable speech. We look in vain here for any breath of a broken and repentant spirit. There is no sign of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find even one word of felt weakness and nothingness. In this one chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while he refers to God only five times.
One writer sets Job 29 beside three other chapters full of "I":
So Job 29 has become one of the great "I" chapters of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter — the true chapter of the self-gratified "I." Job 29 is the chapter of the self-satisfied "I." Romans 7 is the chapter of the self-condemned "I." To be self-condemned is far better than to be self-gratified or self-satisfied. Best of all is to be self-eclipsed, as we find Paul to be in Philippians 3.
- True. Job really did break the oppressor's fangs and pull the victim free. God's own testimony at the start of the book stands behind the claim.
- Provoked. He lists it because Eliphaz had accused him of failing the needy, the widow and the fatherless. Job 29 is his answer.
- Counted. The deed was right; keeping score of it was the flaw. The left hand was never meant to know what the right hand did.
- Not enough. Outward correctness is not righteousness in the presence of God. The searching light of God had not yet reached Job's soul.
- Eclipsed. Self-satisfied is a poor place to stand, self-condemned is far better, and self-eclipsed — as Paul was in Philippians 3 — is best of all.
And I said, I shall die in my nest, and multiply my days as the sand;
Job looks back on his good years and remembers how safe he felt. He expected to die at home, with days beyond counting. What was he picturing? And why did God refuse to leave that picture standing?
One writer works through the images in this verse, including the disputed meaning of "sand."
All this honour, together with his own generosity, made life very attractive to Job. He pushed the end far off into the distance. When it came, it would find him comfortable in his "nest." He would stretch out the days of his life like countless grains of sand. Some read the word instead as the phoenix, the immortal bird of legend. The reading in our version gives a simpler and worthier sense. It also matches the way Scripture uses this picture elsewhere (1 Kings 4:29; Gen. 22:17). Another suggestion is that Job refers to the palm tree — "The righteous flourish like the palm tree." Either way the meaning is clear. He would live on without interruption, like a well-watered tree.
One writer sets this line beside a later verdict on Job and finds two dangers in it.
He said himself, "I shall die in my nest," Job 29:18; and it is recorded again that "he was righteous in his own eyes," Job 32:1. In the first statement Job was in danger of putting his confidence in the wealth God had blessed him with. In the second he was sure he deserved it. But it was God, and not the nest, who kept him safe. And it was God's estimate of his righteousness that counted, not his own. Job needed to learn these two things, and for his own safety and blessing God was about to teach him… Satan set about to destroy everything Job had put his confidence in — his family, his wealth, his health. But the one thing he could not destroy was his faith.
Job 29 is a long recital of his own good deeds, and that shapes how commentators read the whole speech.
Job 29 has become one of the great "I" chapters of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter: that personal pronoun appears 16 times in the first 9 verses — the chapter of the self-gratified "I." Job 29 is the chapter of the self-satisfied "I." Romans 7 is of course the chapter of the self-condemned "I." And to be self-condemned is far better than to be self-gratified or self-satisfied.
Job's trouble had already turned both of these hopes upside down.
"Then I thought, I shall die in my nest." No, no; God was going to disturb that nice nest of his that was so warm and comfortable. "And I shall multiply my days as the sand." Why, he had been very eager for God to cut his days short. That was the only way he could see out of all the trouble he was going through.
The loss was a lesson in where to rest his trust.
And it was a hard lesson for him, difficult to learn and take in. He did not like — and which of us does? — to accept the sentence of death in himself. Yet that was the point: he was not to trust in himself, or in his circumstances in life, or in his natural condition, but in God who raises the dead. "I shall die in my nest" was his thought and his hope. But he was to see his nest stripped bare. Nature had filled it and circumstances had decorated it, and all of it was taken away.
The same writer then draws a line between two kinds of good men.
There is a difference — I would even say a distance — between a righteous man and a devoted man… At the beginning of this history, Job was a righteous man. He was spoken well of again and again, right in front of his accuser. But he was not a devoted man. The whisper of his heart, as I noticed before, was this: "I shall die in my nest."
Read this way, the ruin of Job's comfort belongs to God's care rather than His anger.
But should we not be using our wings now? Yet how ready we are to make our nest here! Job thought he would die in his nest (Job 29:18), but what a shaking poor Job got! Yet was it not in love, for his ultimate good? So it always is when the Lord stirs up our nest and shakes everything here. Is it not so that we may learn to fly?
The warning lands on any settled life, not only on Job's.
Job had been an example in his conduct and his reliability. So he felt quite sure this prosperity would continue undisturbed… How differently things turned out from what he thought! Do we also think we can depend on past experience to sustain us for the future? If so, we forget that we are always totally dependent on the grace of God.
- Nest. Job pictured a quiet death at home, and days as countless as grains of sand. It was an unbroken life, like a well-watered tree.
- Confidence. The danger was not the comfort but the leaning. It was God, not the nest, who kept him safe — and when all he leaned on went, his faith did not.
- Shaking. God disturbed the warm nest on purpose. The man who expected a long life had already begged Him to cut his days short.
- Wings. The stripping was love, teaching Job to trust not in himself or his circumstances but in God who raises the dead.
- Grace. A righteous man is not yet a devoted man. Past blessing guarantees nothing. We depend on God's grace every day.
My root shall be spread out to the waters, and the dew will lie all night on my branch;
Job is looking back at the good years, picturing himself as a tree with roots down in water and branches wet with dew all night. The picture is beautiful, but it raises two questions: where did that freshness come from, and why did God let it go?
The verse belongs to a short run of images — a nest, a tree, a bow — all saying the same thing about the life Job expected to keep.
All this honour, along with his kindness to others, made life very attractive to Job. The end that must come was pushed far into the distance. It would find him comfortable in his "nest." He would stretch out the days of his life like countless grains of sand... In any case the meaning is obvious: he would live on without interruption, like a well-watered tree. So the freshness of the dew would be his, and his bow would stay strong.
Job speaks of the past here, but what he describes is what he assumed would go on without end. Older translations bring that out: "My root shall be spread out to the waters."
Dew is not something a tree makes. It falls on the branch from above, through the night.
It is a blessing, a refreshment sent by God, and withheld as punishment or in discipline... It pictures how God refreshes and strengthens His people through the night, while their Lord is away. It will not be needed when the day breaks and the Sun of righteousness rises with healing in His wings.
That single detail turns the verse around. Job treats this freshness as his own security. But God had to send it fresh each night, and God could hold it back.
Job's confidence was not absurd. Given his life, anyone would have expected the same of him — the man from the land of Uz.
Certainly, if any mortal was entitled to look for a peaceful future from God and before men, it was the man of Uz.
But a reasonable expectation can still rest on sand. Job leaned on his position, his health, his standing — the watered ground itself.
He did not like — and which of us does? — to accept the sentence of death in himself. That way he would not trust in himself, or in his circumstances in life, or in his natural condition, but in God who raises the dead. "I shall die in my nest" was his thought and his hope. But he was to see his nest stripped of everything nature had filled it with and circumstances had decorated it with.
Notice the possessives: my roots, my branches. That habit runs through the whole chapter, and one writer counted it.
This is a truly remarkable statement. We look in vain here for any breathing of a broken and repentant spirit. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find a single expression of any sense of weakness and nothingness. In this one chapter Job refers to himself more than forty times, while the references to God are only five.
The danger in the verse is not pride in wrongdoing. It is assuming that a good past guarantees a good future.
Job had been exemplary in his conduct and his reliability. So he felt quite confident that this prosperity would continue without a break... How differently things turned out from what he thought! Do we also think we can depend on past experience to carry us into the future? If so, we forget that we are totally dependent on the grace of God always.
The book does not end with a dried-up tree. What Job once described as his own natural advantage, he later receives as a gift from the Lord Himself.
The comfort of this! What a story it tells of grace — tireless, patient grace! And so Job flourishes again. The Lord is as the dew to him. He grows like the lily, his branches spread, his beauty is like the olive tree, his fragrance like Lebanon... and others even live under his shade, reviving like grain and growing like the vine.
- Root — Job pictures himself as a tree that never runs dry: unbroken life, fresh growth, strength renewed.
- Dew — God sends the dew and God can hold it back; the freshness Job calls his own came as a gift each night, never as a possession.
- Nest — he expected to end his days undisturbed. That hope rested on his circumstances, not on God who raises the dead.
- "I" — in a single chapter Job speaks of himself over forty times and of God five; he shows no weakness and no self-distrust.
- Grace — a good past secures nothing; we depend on the grace of God always. In the end the Lord Himself becomes the dew to Job, and he flourishes again.
My glory shall be fresh in me, and my bow be renewed in my hand.
Job looks back at the days when everything went well for him. This verse is the high point of that memory: honour that never faded, and strength that never ran out. The picture is true — Job really was that man. But why is he the one telling us?
The verse closes a run of images about permanence — a nest, a long life, a tree whose roots reach water.
Job had been exemplary in his conduct and his reliability, so he felt quite sure this prosperity would go on unbroken. His days would be greatly multiplied, and his death would be one of comfort in his nest (v.18). His root and his branch would be well watered, even at night (v.19). The freshness of vibrant life would continue as before, and his ability for conflict — his bow — would be renewed again and again (v.20). How different things turned out from what he expected! Do we also think we can depend on past experience to carry us through the future? If so, we forget that we always depend entirely on the grace of God.
Scripture gives the bow a settled meaning of its own, different from the sword's.
Throughout Scripture the bow is the symbol of strength to conquer the enemy. The sword is used in hand-to-hand combat; the bow attacks from a distance, opposing the enemy's approach... The bow takes more skill than the sword. But above all it is the symbol of strength, because it takes powerful arms and hands to draw a bow and use it properly.
Count the pronouns in this chapter. The tally shows what the beautiful language rests on.
We look in vain here for any breath of a broken and contrite spirit. There is no sign of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find a single expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In this one chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while he refers to God only five times.
Nothing Job claims is false. The problem is the pleasure he takes in saying it.
He took pleasure in his good character... It is not that there was no great grace in Job, or that he did not keep up a very admirable character. But why should he talk about it? Why should he dwell on it? Why should he not think of the source of all the blessing? Why should he not boast in the Lord, instead of an unspoken boast in himself? That was the very thing God was taking issue with.
The glory Job remembers was his standing among people. Underneath it ran something his neighbours never saw.
Job was a godly man. There were none like him in his generation. But a rapid current was flowing in his soul. He valued his character and his circumstances. He valued his position in life, and his standing among people. In the hidden workings of his heart, he used to look over his fine condition with satisfaction (Job 29). That was a strong undercurrent. His neighbours had never traced where that stream ran, but his heavenly Father had. He loved Job, and He wanted him to share in His holiness. All of this got in the way of that, so He put him into His own school to train him.
Job silences his friends. Winning that argument is not the same as coming out of it well.
We cannot question the truth or the sincerity of all that he says. But we may well ask: is his conclusion a happy one even for himself? He shuts the mouths of his friends and seems fully satisfied with himself. Suppose God let it rest there. Is a completely self-vindicated man a pleasant sight? Divine truth, as well as divine love, will not let him wrap himself in these weeds of self-righteousness. They are, for the most part, borrowed garments belonging to God, to whom Job gives not one bit of glory.
Job speaks of a bow renewed in his own hand. Another kind of renewal works on different terms.
I do not go on in my own strength. I may be weary or weak, but it is God. I may be faint in my mind; but "when I am weak, then I am strong." "Our inner self is being renewed day by day." Dependence is renewal. You never get in the grace of today strength for tomorrow... If the manna was kept a day it went bad — it became self-righteousness. You must be dependent every instant.
- Fresh. Job pictured honour that never faded. His bow — the standard image of strength against an enemy — stayed ready in his own hand.
- Fixed. He treated his past as a guarantee of his future, forgetting that we depend on the grace of God always.
- Forty. In one chapter he mentions himself over forty times and God five times. The language is beautiful. There is no note of weakness in it.
- Hidden. The fault was not open pride his neighbours could spot. It was a current under the surface. His Father traced it, and loved him too much to leave it.
- Renewed. You cannot store strength. The inner self is renewed day by day, and dependence is what renewal looks like.
Unto me they listened, and waited, and kept silence for my counsel
Job is looking back. In this chapter he replays the days when men stopped talking to hear his advice. The commentators ask a harder question. Why did this honest record of his own goodness bring him no comfort?
Verses 21 to 25 describe a man whose counsel needed no defending. One writer gathers what Job could not forget:
How could he forget the weight his words carried? Men waited in silence for them. No one answered back. They welcomed his words the way thirsty land waits for rain, with mouths open wide for the late rains. In short, Job was their treasured counsellor in difficulty. He sat as chief, lived like a king among his troops, and really was one who comforted the mourners. Such, without a break, had been his life in former days.
The silence was not fear of a domineering man. One writer traces it to the kind of counsel Job gave:
Here Job speaks again as he did in verses 11 to 17. He dwells on the effect he had on his hearers in days past, when men listened closely to him and did not interrupt. This was not because of a forceful character that demanded men's attention. It was because his counsel seemed so gentle and wise (v. 21). When he spoke, they had no reply (v. 22). His words were like dew, with a calming effect, not like an unstoppable storm. His words clearly carried such weight that men would wait for his counsel. When they opened their mouth wide, it was not to speak. It was to drink in the counsel Job gave (v. 23).
Another writer describes how those decisions landed:
His decision was for them the final word, and it called for no response. Yet his words were not like the withering sentence of an unyielding judge. They were like the gentle dew or the rain. His smile was like a ray of light to them.
Everything Job says here is true. The difficulty is who stands at the centre of it. One writer counted:
This is truly a remarkable statement. We look in vain for any breathing of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find so much as a single expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In this one chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times. He mentions God only five times.
The same writer admires the picture and still names what ruins it:
It is indeed a beautiful picture, but spoiled by the pride of telling it about himself. "Let another praise you, and not your own mouth."
Job really was godly. So what needed changing? One writer points to something hidden under an admirable life:
Job was a godly man. There were none like him in his generation. But in his soul a rapid current was flowing. He valued his character and his circumstances. Not that he was self-righteous or worldly in the ordinary way. He was truly a believer, and a generous friend and benefactor. But he valued his circumstances in life and his standing among men. In the hidden workings of his heart he was in the habit of surveying his fine condition with satisfaction (see Job 29). That was a strong undercurrent. His neighbours had not traced the course of that stream, but his heavenly Father had. He loved him, and He wanted him to share His holiness. None of this fitted with that holiness. So He put him into His own school to train him.
Looking back brings Job no relief:
The ashes of his past joys can give no warmth to his poor comfortless heart today. They can only feed the flame of that pride which burns all the more brightly among the ruins of its past.
- Listened — Men fell silent for Job's counsel, not because he overpowered them. His words fell like dew and rain, and they opened their mouths to drink them in.
- Loved — He was their treasured adviser in trouble. He sat as chief, lived like a king among his troops, and comforted the mourners. The record is true.
- Lost — All of it was gone, and telling it over again could not warm him. Remembered honour only fed the pride still burning in the ruins.
- Laid bare — In one chapter Job speaks of himself more than forty times and of God five. The words are accurate; the centre is wrong, and there is no trace of a broken spirit.
- Loved enough to be trained — A hidden stream ran under a godly life: Job valued his standing among men. His neighbours never saw it. His Father did, and because He loved him, He took him into His own school.
After my words they spoke not again, and my speech dropped upon them;
Job is remembering the days when his word settled every matter and nobody answered back. Chapter 29 is a beautiful picture of a good man's influence — and the commentators ask what God saw beneath it.
One writer explains what made men listen to Job without interrupting.
Here Job dwells on the effects produced in his hearers in days past, when men listened carefully to him and did not interrupt. This was not because of a forceful character that demanded men's attention. It was because of the evident gentle wisdom of his counsel (v.21). When he spoke, they had no answer to give back (v.22). His words were like dew, with a calming effect, not like an unstoppable storm. His words clearly carried such weight that men would wait for his counsel. When they opened their mouth wide it was not to speak, but to drink in the counsel Job gave (v.23).
The word behind "dropped" belongs to the language of weather.
The word is used for "rain," as in Judges 5:4: "the clouds dropped water." Related to this is the thought of any outflow: "The mountains shall drip sweet wine" (Amos 9:13). Growing out of this, we have it used to describe speech as flowing out, or distilling: "my word dropped upon them" (Job 29:22); "your lips drip nectar" (Song 4:11). The plain language of the New Testament may well explain that last one: "all spoke well of him and marveled at the gracious words that were coming from his mouth" (Luke 4:22).
One writer gathers the whole scene: how men waited on Job's words, and what he was to them.
How could he ignore the weight attached to his words? Men waited, and kept silence for them. Nobody answered back. They welcomed his words gladly, like thirsty land waiting for rain, with mouths opened wide as for the latter rain. His laugh could drive away distrust, instead of their low spirits darkening the light of his face. In short, Job was their treasured counsellor in difficulty. He sat as chief, lived like a king among his troops, and really was one who comforted those who mourned. Such, without a break, had been his life in former days.
Something is missing from this lovely memory, and one writer names it.
This is truly a most remarkable statement. We look in vain for any breathing of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find so much as a single expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In the course of this one chapter Job refers to himself more than forty times, while the references to God are only five.
Job's greatness was real. What God was dealing with lay deeper than his neighbours could see.
Job was a godly man. There were none like him in his generation. But in his soul a swift current was running. He valued his character and his circumstances. Not that he was self-righteous or worldly in the usual way. He was truly a believer, and a generous friend and benefactor. But he valued his circumstances in life, and his standing among men. In the hidden workings of his heart, he used to survey his fine condition with quiet satisfaction. Job 29. That was a strong undercurrent. His neighbours had not traced the course of that stream; but his heavenly Father had. He loved Job, and would have him share His holiness, and all this was inconsistent with it. So He put him into His own school to train him.
The story does not end with Job speaking. It ends with Job silent.
He had no answer to the divine challenge beyond the confession implied in laying his hand on his mouth. Once he had spoken, but he would not reply; twice, but he would add no more. The folly of not submitting is now before his soul. He had spoken too much: silence suited him. It was for the LORD to speak.
- Mouths closed — Job's counsel silenced men not by force but by gentle wisdom; nobody had an answer to give back.
- Mouths open — They drank his words in like dry ground waiting for rain. The same word describes clouds dropping water.
- Mouth full of self — In one chapter Job speaks of himself over forty times and of God five. The memory is real; the proportion is wrong.
- A hidden current — He was godly and generous, yet he prized his standing among men. His Father saw the stream his neighbours never traced.
- Mouth stopped — The man whose word once ended every discussion lays his hand over his own mouth. He had spoken too much. It was God's turn to speak.
And they waited for me as for the rain, and they opened their mouth wide as for the latter rain.
Job looks back from his misery to the days when his word carried a whole community. He describes it with the picture a desert people knew best — thirsty ground waiting for rain — and commentators ask a harder question about the man drawing it.
The image is not of people waiting to answer him, but of people waiting to drink. One writer traces how Job's counsel landed on his hearers:
Job returns here to speak in much the same way as he did in verses 11 to 17. He dwells on the effect he had on his hearers in days past, when men listened to him and did not interrupt. This was not because of a forceful character that demanded men's attention. It came from the seemingly gentle wisdom of his counsel. When he spoke, they had no reply. His words were like dew, with a calming effect, not like an irresistible storm. They carried such weight that men would wait for his counsel. When they opened their mouth wide, it was not to speak, but to drink in the counsel Job gave.
Another writer points out who is in view — not fellow advisers, but the people Job's decisions helped:
His decisions show their effect on the people he helped rather than on his fellow councillors. His decision was the final word for them, calling for no response. And yet his words were not like the crushing sentence of an unbending judge. They were like the gentle dew or the rain.
One writer gathers the whole scene — the silence, the lack of any reply, the thirst:
How could he overlook the weight his words carried? Or the waiting and the silence for them? No one contradicted him. His words were welcomed like thirsty land waiting for rain, with open mouth as for the spring rain. … In short, Job was their treasured counsellor in difficulty. He sat as chief, lived like a king among his troop, and really was one who comforted the mourners. Such, without a break, had been his life in former days.
One commentator weighs the tone of the whole chapter and counts its pronouns:
This is truly a most remarkable statement. We look in vain here for any breathing of a broken and contrite spirit. There is no sign of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find a single expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In the course of this one chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times. The references to God are only five. It reminds us of Romans 7, where "I" also dominates. But there is this immense difference. In Romans 7, "I" is a poor, weak, good-for-nothing, wretched creature in the presence of the holy law of God. In Job 29, "I" is a most important, influential person, admired and almost worshipped by those around him.
Job's failure was not open wickedness. It ran underneath, where only God could see it:
Job was a godly man. There was no one like him in his generation. But in his soul a fast current was flowing. He valued his character and his circumstances. Not that he was self-righteous or worldly in the ordinary way. He was truly a believer, and a generous friend and benefactor. But he valued his circumstances in life, and his standing among men. In the hidden movements of his heart, he used to survey his fine condition with satisfaction. That was a strong undercurrent. His neighbours had not traced the course of that stream, but his heavenly Father had. He loved Job, and He wanted him to share His holiness. All this did not fit with that holiness. So He put him into His own school to exercise him.
One writer reads the longing that opens this chapter as a warning sign, not a virtue:
There is where Job failed. Job admired himself. And so he looks back. "Oh, that I were as in the months of old." God was going to do far better. It is true that Job went through very severe sifting. But it was all for his good. More than that, it was for your good and my good, and for the good of every believer who has ever profited by this book since God had it written.
- Rain. Job's counsel fell like dew and rain — weighty, welcome, calming, never crushing.
- Thirst. The open mouth belongs to a drinker, not a debater: people came to him for counsel, and he recalled every detail of it.
- Undercurrent. Under a genuinely godly life ran a strong current of self-satisfaction that only God had traced.
- Source. Forty mentions of himself and only five of God show who filled Job's view.
- Better rain. God's severe sifting did not end Job's blessing. It led to something better — for him and for every reader since.
[If] I laughed on them, they believed [it] not; and they troubled not the serenity of my countenance.
Job looks back on the days when his word settled every matter, and adds one last detail: what his face did to people. The verse raises two questions — what the picture means, and whether a good man should be telling it.
Job is describing men who came to him in trouble and went away steadied. One writer describes both the weight of his words and the light of his smile.
His decisions were for them the final word, and called for no response. Yet his words were not like the withering sentence of an unbending judge. They were like the gentle dew or the rain. His smile was as a ray of light to them. The thought here is a little unclear. Does Job mean that his smile was a blessing to them, or that it was a token of his lasting self-satisfaction? The usual thought, though, is plain. If they were in doubt and trouble, his smile reassured them. No grief of theirs could alter his steady cheerfulness. He was as a king among them, regarded with a reverence close to worship.
Commentators differ over the second line. One writer lists the readings that others have offered.
Most take it this way. If Job laid aside his dignified gravity and smiled on them, they could hardly believe he would pay them such notice... Others have suggested a different sense. They would not believe that Job would laugh at them, or that he would let the light of his face — his dignified cheerfulness — fall. Mr. Carey takes the word to mean "they presume." The sense is that, despite his graciousness, they do not lightly provoke him or take advantage.
He prefers a reading where Job dispels gloom instead of catching it:
His laugh was suited to drive away distrust; their low spirits did not darken the light of his face.
The trouble is not that the memory is false. It is that Job is the one telling it, at length, about himself.
Job 29 has become one of the great "I" chapters of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter: that personal pronoun occurs sixteen times in the first nine verses. It is a true chapter of the self-gratified "I." Job 29 is the chapter of the self-satisfied "I." Romans 7 is of course the chapter of the self-condemned "I." And to be self-condemned is far better than to be self-gratified or self-satisfied. Best of all is to be self-eclipsed, as we find Paul to be in Philippians 3, where he mentions "I" a good many times.
Job's kindness was real. The flaw lies elsewhere — in his awareness of it.
In truth, Job was a man full of grace; but, sadly, he perceived it, and his heart needed to be better taught about what he was before God.
One writer treats the backward look itself as a symptom. Under pressure, Job turned back to his own history.
Under pressure a person sometimes sees more of the wisdom of God and His way. The more I see of it, the more depressed I will become, if I cannot rightly connect myself with God. So I turn back on my own history and become occupied with myself. In Job 29, then, Job dwells on the past. This is always evidence that the soul is not right with God. A soul going on with Him would have greater things than the past to recount.
The chapter is not the end of the story. God was at work to change how Job saw himself.
In Job 29 we find that his heart had dwelt on his upright and kind walk with satisfaction. He commended himself and fed his self-love with it... God was bringing him to say, "Now my eye sees You and I abhor myself." Job ends his discourse with these chapters — 29, 30, 31 — which express his good opinion of himself. He had told his whole heart out. He was self-satisfied. The grace of God had worked in him, and in a lovely way. But the human heart is treacherous, and he was not in God's presence, which detects this. So the present effect was to make him lovely in his own eyes.
- Grace given. The kindness Job describes was real. Commentators call him a man full of grace, and his smile steadied people in trouble.
- Grace noticed. The damage began when he perceived it — his own goodness became lovely in his own eyes.
- Grace recited. Job 29 turns that into speech, the chapter of the self-satisfied "I," where he tells his whole heart out.
- Grace disputed. Even the wording is uncertain: did they doubt he would notice them, or was nothing able to darken his face? Commentators offer more than one reading.
- Grace corrected. Dwelling on the past shows a soul not going on with God — and God was leading Job to say, "now my eye sees You, and I abhor myself."
I chose their way, and sat as chief, and dwelt as a king in the army, as one that comforteth mourners.
Job ends his memories of better days at the very top: he led, he ruled, he comforted. Commentators see two things at once: a true record of a great and kind man, and a speech in which that man cannot stop talking about himself.
One writer pictures Job stepping in when people did not know what to do.
When people were in confusion, Job was there to choose their way for them (v.25). He even felt himself as a king in the army, able to arrange things for the people in a way they knew was good for them. How unusual a man he was!
His place was not an office anyone had given him. Kelly notes how much weight this carried: "so great was the reverence that greeted Job's presence among them, with an influence all the more because it was unofficial" (William Kelly).
One writer draws out the last phrase from an older wording of the verse.
Job says, "I sat chief, and lived as a king among warriors, as one comforting fellow-mourners." He was as one with them.
Kelly adds that this was no passing phase.
In short, Job was their treasured adviser in trouble... and he really was one who comforted the mourners. That had been his life all along, without a break.
Every word of it was true. That is the difficulty — one writer counted the pronouns.
This is truly a most remarkable statement. We look in vain for any sign of a broken and contrite spirit here. There are no signs of self-loathing, or even of self-distrust. We cannot find so much as a single expression of conscious weakness and nothingness. In this one chapter, Job refers to himself more than forty times, while the references to God are only five.
That makes the chapter one of a set, and the set has an order to it.
Job 29 has become one of the great "I" chapters of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 2 is Solomon's "I" chapter. That pronoun occurs 16 times in the first 9 verses, and it is the true chapter of the self-gratified "I". Job 29 is the chapter of the self-satisfied "I". Romans 7 is of course the chapter of the self-condemned "I". And to be self-condemned is far better than to be self-gratified or self-satisfied. Best of all is to be self-eclipsed, as we find Paul to be in Philippians 3, where he mentions "I" a good many times.
The problem was not that Job's good deeds were false, but that he had begun to rest on them.
Job was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That clearly proves he had never really been in the presence of God... We find also in Job 29 that his heart had dwelt on his upright and kind life with self-satisfaction, praising himself and feeding his self-love with it. "When the eye saw me it gave witness to me." God was bringing him to say, "Now my eye sees You, and I abhor myself."
(The two lines Job quotes are Job 29:11 and Job 42:5–6 in an older translation. The ESV of the second reads, "but now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself.")
God dealt with him out of love, not anger. Job "valued his character and his circumstances," and God, "because He loved him... put him into His own school to train him" (J. G. Bellett). Kelly presses it with questions: there was real grace in Job, "but why should he talk about it? Why should he think about it? Why should he not think of the source of all the blessing?" (William Kelly).
There is another way to comfort mourners, and the difference is where the comfort comes from. One writer sets Paul's opening words in 2 Corinthians against this verse.
He offers himself to our confidence, not as a self-cured physician, and not in the spirit of Job, who in his own sufficiency sat as one that comforts the mourners (Job 29:25). He offers himself as one whom God had first emptied and then filled with the fullness of His own effectual grace.
- Real. Job did choose people's way, sit as chief, and comfort mourners. The writers do not doubt a word of it.
- Rehearsed. The same record turns into a trap when a man counts it over to himself. In one chapter he names himself more than forty times, and God five.
- Rooted. He had started to treat his upright walk as his righteousness, which shows he had not yet stood in God's presence.
- Removed. God took the seat of honour away in love, not anger, to bring Job to say, "now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself."
- Refilled. Real comfort for mourners never comes from self-sufficiency. It comes from a person God has first emptied and then filled.
But now they that are younger than I have me in derision, whose fathers I would have disdained to set with the dogs of my flock.
Job has just finished describing his golden days, when his grand deeds won him everyone's high opinion. Chapter 30 turns on two words — "But now" — and the lowest men now laugh at the man the great once praised.
Two small words carry the weight of the whole chapter.
There is special emphasis in the words, "But now." Job draws a striking contrast between his past and his present. In Job 30 he is still occupied with himself. It is still "I;" but how changed. The very men who flattered him in the day of his prosperity treat him with contempt in the day of his adversity. That is always how it goes in this poor, false, deceitful world, and it is good for us to be made to prove it. Sooner or later everyone must find out how hollow the world is. The same people who cry "Hosanna" today will cry "Crucify Him" tomorrow.
Mockery from young men cut deep, because Job had lived on people's good opinion. His reply about their fathers is not gentle.
You can imagine how painful that was. He was a man who had been living a good deal on the witness of these grand deeds and on people's high opinion of him... "Whose fathers I would have disdained to set with the dogs of my flock." Ah, Job, you can be cutting; you can strike deep when you want to. He would not have set their fathers with the dogs of his flock! Just think of it.
Job looks at the men behind the laughter — starving scavengers of the desert.
These younger men spared no unfeeling jibe that could wound him to the quick. Even for physical strength they were worthless, their prime ruined by want and hunger. What else could you expect from men who until now had been gnawing whatever they could find in the desert?... plucking saltwort in the thickets, and finding food, wretched as it was, in roots of broom.
Job had spoken earlier of rescuing the poor. His words here turn back on him.
This reveals another side of Job's character. He spoke before of delivering the poor and the fatherless and those who had no helper (ch. 29:12). Was it love for them that really moved him? If so, where was his love for this class of people, whom he had apparently looked at with contempt? Now they are treating him with contempt, and he feels deeply insulted. Again this shows the pride that Job needed to have broken down, and which was indeed broken down later.
Loss teaches a man what people are worth. That lesson alone does not heal him.
But remember well that much more is needed than the stripping of self and the discovery of how hollow and deceitful the world is. A person may go through all of this and the result be nothing but frustration and disappointment. Indeed it can be nothing more if God is not reached... Was this the spirit of Christ? Would Job have spoken this way at the close of the book? He would not. When Job once got into God's presence, there was an end to the self-absorption of Job 29 and the bitterness of Job 30.
Job answered his mockers with anger. Another Sufferer met the same scorn and did not.
We can only compare his anger at their taunts with the meekness of Him "who when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten."... But He, like one who did not hear, gave His back to those who strike and His cheeks to those who pull out the beard. "I hid not My face from disgrace and spitting" (Isa. 50:6). Who is it that said this? Not a man lamenting his former grandeur, but One who had voluntarily given up His glory in love for His enemies.
- But now — two words split Job's life in two: honour yesterday, mockery from outcasts today.
- The world turns — the men who flattered him in his good days now despise him. It is good to find out how hollow the world is.
- The mirror — the insult shows what praise had hidden. Job once spoke of rescuing the poor; now he cannot bear their contempt.
- Loss is not enough — being stripped bare leaves only bitterness. Reaching God ended Job's self-absorption and his bitterness.
- The contrast — Christ met the same scorn and spitting without answering back. He had given up His glory in love for His enemies.
Yea, whereto [should] the strength of their hands [profit] me, [men] in whom vigour hath perished?
Job has been remembering his days of honour. Now younger men mock him — men whose fathers he would not have put with the dogs of his flock. Verse 2 gives his reason for that scorn: their hands were of no use to him. The reason tells us as much about Job as about them.
The verse is an argument, not just an insult. Job rated these men low because their hands could do nothing for him.
He would not have set their fathers with the dogs of his flock! Just think of it. And he gives his reason. He says, "What could I gain from the strength of their hands?" Job was a wise man. If he had servants, he had servants who could do their duty. But as often happens with the most miserable of the world, they are weak. They cannot do a good day's work, or even a good hour's work.
The phrase does not mean old age. It points to men worn out before their time, and the same writer fills in what had drained them and how they had been living.
Even in physical strength they were worthless. Want and hunger had destroyed their prime. What else could you expect from men who until now had been gnawing whatever they could find in the desert? And not in green places either, but in total waste and wilderness. They pulled up saltwort in the thickets, and found food, wretched as it was, in the roots of broom or juniper. How sad to think of such degradation for members of the human race even in those early days!
Job treats their ruined strength as proof that they are worth nothing. Another writer presses the obvious question back on him.
He goes on to describe the sorry condition of these mockers. "Their vigour has perished. They are gaunt from want and famine" (vv. 2-3). Job does not consider that some such people may not be to blame for their condition, but he seems to think they were not worth considering. After all, they had to scrounge their food from unhealthy sources (v. 4). Men drove them out to live in caves or clefts in the valleys (vv. 5-6). For he says, "they were sons of fools, yes, sons of vile men." Can God not save sons of vile men? Indeed He can, and often does. Should not Job have cared for others brought so low, when he himself had fallen from his former state?
Job once pitied outcasts like these and helped them. Now he stands where they stood, and his tone toward them has changed.
Job's words about his former greatness described his generous pity for the wretched outcasts he comforted and cheered. Turning to the present, he seems to have changed places with these men, or with people like them. Now he speaks of them with no language of sympathy, but with the deepest contempt. Pride speaks of those "whose fathers I would have disdained to set with the dogs of my flock." Their elders were beneath his contempt, and now the younger men laugh at him... The wound to his pride, in having such a rabble mock him, is clearly the deepest of his mental sufferings.
Job answers mockery with scorn. The same writer sets him beside One who met mockery in silence.
We can only compare his anger at their taunts with the meekness of Him "who, when He was insulted, did not insult in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten."... But He acted as One who did not hear: He "gave His back to those who struck Him, and His cheeks to those who pulled out His hair; I did not hide my face from shame and spitting" (Isaiah 50:6). Who is it that said this? Not a man mourning over lost greatness. This was One who had given up His glory by His own choice, in love for His enemies. He could have freed Himself from His troubles at any moment, by asking His Father or by using His own power.
Job reads his ruin as God being hard on him. One writer explains why the trial was not yet over.
He mourns his terrible state. Up to now he could not hold back the thought that God dealt harshly with him, and was arbitrary. He could not understand His ways at all. He also missed the motive God had — the gracious purpose. In short, he had not reached the end of the Lord, because he had not done with himself. That is the real secret of it.
- Measure. Job values these men by what their hands could produce. Hunger had drained their strength, so he counts them worthless.
- Blind spot. He never asks whether their condition was their fault — and God saves the sons of vile men.
- Reversal. The man who once pitied outcasts now stands among them, and the pity turns to contempt.
- Wound. Mockery from such men cut deeper than anything else he suffered in mind. The injury was to his pride.
- Purpose. The humbling went on because Job had not yet done with himself. Christ, mocked and silent, shows the other answer.
Withered up through want and hunger, they flee into waste places long since desolate and desert
Job has just finished remembering his former greatness. Now he turns to the people who laugh at him. He describes their hunger before he describes their mockery.
This is not poverty in the abstract. Starvation has wrecked their bodies, and the ground they scrape gives nothing fit to eat.
Even in physical strength they were worthless, for want and hunger had destroyed their prime. What else could you expect from people who had been gnawing at whatever they could find in the desert? This was not in places where green, pleasant spots grew, but in unbroken waste and wild land. There they plucked saltwort in the thickets when they could find it, and found food, wretched as it was, in the roots of broom or juniper. How sad to think of such degradation for members of the human race even in those early days!
Another writer traces their hunger to the land itself.
Withered up from hunger, they gnaw the roots of weeds growing in the waste. That land stopped yielding true food for man long ago.
Job had just claimed, in the chapter before, that he rescued the poor and the fatherless. Now he speaks of that same class with contempt, and one commentator presses the contradiction.
Job's disdain for such men reveals another side of his character. He spoke before of delivering the poor and the fatherless and those who had no helper. Was it love for them that really moved him? If so, where was his love for this class of people, whom apparently he had looked at with contempt?
Job and these outcasts have changed places. He once pitied them; now they mock him.
Job's words about his former greatness described his generous pity for the wretched outcasts he comforted and cheered. Moving to the present, he seems to have changed places with these people, or with others like them. He in turn speaks of them not with the language of sympathy but of deepest contempt… But in Job there is no turning to God under such unjust treatment. Clearly the wound to his pride, in having such a rabble mock him, is the deepest of his mental sufferings.
Job writes these people off by their background, as if their condition settled their worth.
Job does not consider that some such people may not be to blame for their condition. He seems to think they were not worth considering, because they have to scrounge their food from unhealthy sources and are driven from other people to live in caves or clefts in the valleys. For he calls them sons of fools and sons of vile men. Can God not save sons of vile men? Indeed He can, and often does.
Job has lost everything, and the loss by itself has not helped him. One writer explains why.
But let it be well remembered that much more is needed than the stripping of self and the discovery that the world is hollow and deceitful. A person may go through all of this and the result be nothing but frustration and disappointment. In fact it can be nothing more if God is not reached. If the heart is not brought to find its all-satisfying portion in God, a reversal of fortune leaves it desolate. The discovery that people are fickle and hollow fills it with bitterness… Once Job got into God's presence, there was an end to the self-centredness of chapter 29 and the bitterness of chapter 30.
Job answered his mockers with anger. Another Man faced worse and answered differently.
We can only compare his anger at their taunts with the meekness of Him "who when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten." All through His life our Lord had the shadow of man's rejection falling on Him. But in His darkest hour — "your hour, and the power of darkness" — they poured out their curses and their taunts. But He, like one who did not hear, said: "I gave my back to those who strike, and my cheeks to those who pull out the beard; I hid not my face from disgrace and spitting." Who is it that said this? Not a man lamenting his former grandeur, but One who had voluntarily given up His glory in love for His enemies.
- Want. The verse pictures real starvation — strength gone, food scraped from desert roots.
- Contempt. Job names these people only to measure how far he has fallen. Commentators hear pride here, not compassion.
- Mirror. The man who once claimed to rescue the poor now despises the poor, and does not see that he has become one of them.
- Grace. Job writes these mockers off as beyond saving. God does not — He can and does save such people.
- God. Loss on its own leaves only bitterness. Job's pride and bitterness ended when he came into God's presence.
They gather the salt-wort among the bushes, and the roots of the broom for their food.
Job has turned from his honoured past to the men who now laugh at him. Here he describes what they live on, and the picture raises a question: why does a suffering man speak of other sufferers with such scorn?
Two plants are named here, and both belonged to people with nothing else to eat. The first is a wild herb:
A common herb that the poor would eat to satisfy their hunger. Job 30:4. Several have judged the herb to be the Atriplex halimus. It has a sour taste, but not so sour that people could not eat it.
The second plant is not the juniper we know today:
This word is thought to mean, not the juniper, but the Arabic ratam, the Retama raetam. It is a "broom" that grows twelve feet high, and a person could sit under it for shelter. 1 Kings 19:4-5. Job 30:4 mentions its roots, which the poor used for food.
Kelly looks at the lives behind such a diet:
What else could you expect from people who until now had been gnawing whatever they could find in the desert? And this was not in pleasant country, but in waste and wild land with no relief. They plucked saltwort in the thickets when they could find it, and they found food, wretched as it was, in roots of broom or juniper. How sad to think of such degradation for members of the human race even in those early days! We usually link outcasts like these with the crowded dens of shame and crime in some great city. They were there in those days too, behind the scenes of desert life.
Job lists their food as proof that these men are beneath notice. Grant answers that judgment:
Job does not consider that some of these people may not be to blame for their condition. They have to scrounge their food from unhealthy sources (v.4). Other men drive them out to live in caves or clefts in the valleys (vv.5-6). Job seems to think this makes them not worth considering, for he calls them sons of fools, sons of vile men. Can God not save sons of vile men? Indeed He can, and often does. Should Job not have cared about others brought so low, especially when he himself had fallen from his former state?
Ridout sets Job's earlier words about his own greatness against his words here:
Job's words about his former greatness described his generous pity for the wretched outcasts. He brought them comfort and cheer. Now, in the present, he seems to have changed places with these people, or with people like them. This time he speaks of them not with the language of sympathy, but with deepest contempt. It is a sad picture of pride, which grows bitter as it dwells on its wrongs.
Grant asks what Job's reaction shows about the man himself:
He spoke before of delivering the poor and the fatherless and those who had no helpers (ch. 29:12). Was it love for them that really moved him? If so, where was his love for this class of people, whom he had apparently looked at with contempt? Now they are treating him with contempt, and he feels deeply insulted. Again this shows the pride that Job needed to have broken down, and which was indeed broken down later.
Ridout compares Job's anger with the meekness of Christ under mockery:
We can only compare his anger at their taunts with the meekness of Him "who when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten."... Who is it that said this? Not a man mourning his lost greatness, but One who had given up His glory by His own choice, in love for His enemies. He could have freed Himself from His troubles at any moment, by an appeal to His Father or by putting forth His own power.
- Diet — the saltwort Job names was a sour wild herb. Only people with no other food ate it. The "juniper" was a desert broom shrub, and they chewed its roots.
- Scorn — Job names this diet as proof that his mockers are worthless. He assumes that men who scavenge for food are men not worth considering.
- Contradiction — one chapter earlier he had spoken of rescuing the poor. Commentators ask where that love went, now that the poor are the ones laughing at him.
- Pride — the insult stings because it lands on his pride. That pride was the thing Job needed broken, and it was broken later.
- Contrast — Christ was reviled and did not revile in return. Beside Him, Job's wounded dignity shows a heart still guarding its own honour.
They are driven forth from among [men] -- they cry after them as after a thief --
Job looked back over his former greatness in chapter 29. Chapter 30 turns to the present, where the men who now laugh at him are the outcasts of desert life.
These mockers were not Job's friends. They were people living rough on the edge of the wilderness. One writer takes the verse phrase by phrase: how they were driven out, how people shouted after them, and where they had to live.
We usually connect such social outcasts with the crowded dens of shame and crime in some great city. But they existed then too, behind the scenes of desert life. Men drove them out from the middle of society, Job says, and hooted at them as at a thief. They had to find a home in horrible glens, in holes in the earth, and in hollow rocks.
Set the two chapters side by side. Job and these outcasts have traded places: he once pitied them, and now they look down on him.
Job's words about his former greatness described his kind pity for the wretched outcasts he comforted and cheered. Now he passes into the present. He seems to have changed places with these people, or with people like them. This time he speaks of them not with the language of sympathy but of deepest contempt... They were driven away from other people like thieves. Their home was in valleys and dark holes, and they croaked or brayed like animals. And these outcasts pour their contempt upon him! ... Clearly the wound to his pride, in having such a rabble mock him, is the deepest of his mental sufferings.
Even the language Job chooses is sharp. He had said he would not have ranked their fathers with the dogs that guarded his sheep, and one writer notes how well Job could wound when he wanted to:
Ah! Job, you can be cutting; you can strike deep if you are so disposed. He would not have set their fathers with the dogs of his flock! Just think of it.
Job treats the condition of these people as proof that their opinion counted for nothing. But their poverty may say more about how others treated them than about what they deserved. And it says nothing about what God can do with them.
Job does not consider that some such people may not be to blame for their condition. He seems to think they were not worth considering, because they had to scrounge their food from unhealthy sources, and because they were driven away from other people to live in caves or clefts in the valleys... Can God not save sons of vile men? Indeed He can, and often does. Should Job not have cared about others brought so low, especially when he himself had come down from his former state?
Job's anger invites a comparison. Another Sufferer faced the same mockery from the lowest of society, and He answered in a completely different spirit.
Scorn them as he may, Job has to admit that they mock him, and that he is their song and their byword. We can only compare his anger at their taunts with the meekness of Him "who when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten." ... He was not a man mourning over his lost greatness. He was One who had given up His glory by choice, in love for His enemies. He could have freed Himself from His troubles at any moment, by an appeal to His Father or by putting forth His own power.
Job has lost everything, and he has found out how fast people turn. That discovery did not soften him. It made him bitter.
But remember well, much more is needed than the stripping of self and the discovery of how hollow and deceitful the world is. A person may go through all of this and the result be nothing but frustration and disappointment. Indeed it can be nothing more if God is not reached... Ah no, reader; once Job got into God's presence, there was an end to the egotism of Job 29 and the bitterness of Job 30.
- Outcast described. Settled society drove these mockers out. People shouted after them as after a thief, and they lived in ravines, holes and rocks.
- Outcast despised. Job once comforted people like these. Now he scorns them, and his deepest wound is that such a crowd dares to laugh at him.
- Outcast overlooked. Job never asks whether they were to blame for their misery. He never asks whether God could save even men like these. God can, and often does.
- Outcast honoured. Another Sufferer met the same mockery and did not answer back. He had laid aside His glory by choice, in love for His enemies.
- Outcast healed. Losing everything only made Job bitter. Reaching God ended the egotism of chapter 29 and the bitterness of chapter 30.
To dwell in gloomy gorges, in caves of the earth and the rocks
Job is remembering how far he has fallen. The men who now jeer at him are men he once would not have hired — outcasts driven out of society, scraping food from the desert and sheltering in caves.
One rendering brings out how brutal the picture is. These outcasts are not merely poor. Others chase them away like criminals:
At them, driven out from among people, they hooted as at a thief, so that they had to live in the horror of the glens, in dens of the earth and rocks. Among the bushes they brayed, under the nettles they huddled — sons of folly, sons of no-name, who were whipped out of the land.
The same writer stops to feel the weight of it. These were real human beings, and their misery is the kind we usually associate with the worst slums of a modern city:
How sad to think of such degradation for members of the human race even in those early days! Such social outcasts, whom we normally connect with the overcrowded dens of shame and crime in some great city, were not missing even then, behind the scenes of desert life.
Job treats their living conditions as proof that they count for nothing. One commentator raises the obvious objection. Job never asks whether their state is really their fault, or whether God cares about them:
Job does not consider that some of these people may not be to blame for their condition. They have sunk to scrounging food from unhealthy sources, and others have driven them away to live in caves or clefts in the valleys. He seems to think this made them not worth considering. For he says, "they were sons of fools, yes, sons of vile men." Can God not save sons of vile men? Indeed He can, and often does. Should Job not have cared about others brought so low, when he himself had fallen from his former place?
Job has just described his own kindness to the helpless. Now the same people appear again, and his tone has changed:
Job's words about his former greatness described his generous pity for the wretched outcasts he comforted and cheered. Coming to the present, he seems to have changed places with these people, or people like them. Now he speaks of them not with sympathy but with the deepest contempt… But in Job there is no turning to God under such unjust treatment. Clearly his deepest mental suffering is the wound to his pride, when such a rabble mocks him.
The mockery is only the surface. Underneath it Job traces everything back to God, and that is what he cannot bear:
None was so low that he could not look at Job with derision and scorn… But a deeper and more constant sorrow weighed on him. He could not shut out the harrowing conviction that his endless suffering in the body came from the hand of God — the very One from whom he might have expected compassion. Now he had to give up all hope of relief or rescue from above. He gave up hope, too, of even the most ordinary sympathy from people who are quick to feel for the misery of others.
One commentator sets Job's anger beside the meekness of Christ under similar treatment:
Scorn them as he may, Job has to admit that he is mocked by them, that he is their song and their byword. We can only compare his anger at their taunts with the meekness of Him "who when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten"… He answered like one who did not hear: "I gave my back to those who strike, and my cheeks to those who pull out the beard; I hid not my face from disgrace and spitting" (Isa. 50:6). Who said this? Not a man lamenting his lost grandeur. This was One who had given up His glory by His own choice, out of love for His enemies. He could have freed Himself from His troubles at any moment.
Job has lost his standing and discovered how shallow people's respect was. That discovery, by itself, does not heal anything:
Much more is needed than the stripping away of self and the discovery that the world is hollow and deceitful. A person may go through all of this, and the result be nothing but frustration and disappointment. Indeed it can be nothing more if God is not reached. If the heart does not find all its satisfaction in God, a reversal of fortune leaves it desolate… Once Job got into God's presence, the self-absorption of chapter 29 and the bitterness of chapter 30 came to an end.
- Driven out. The mockers are men hooted at like thieves, living in gullies, holes and rocks — the lowest of the low in Job's world.
- Driven down. Job has changed places with them. The sting is not the pain but the shame — wounded pride is his deepest suffering.
- Driven aside. Job writes them off as sons of vile men, never asking whether God can save such people — and He can, and often does.
- Driven to despair. Behind the jeering Job sees God's hand, and gives up hope of any help from above.
- Driven to God. Loss alone only makes a person bitter. Only God Himself satisfies the heart — and in His presence Job's self-praise and bitterness end.
They bray among the bushes; under the brambles they are gathered together
Job has turned from the honour he once had to the men who now laugh at him. He gives them animal noises instead of speech — which raises two questions: who were they, and what does that show about Job?
Verse 7 sits in the opening section of chapter 30, where Job describes the men who mock him:
Job may dwell on the past as long as he likes. In the end he has to turn to the present, with its wretched contrast. We may divide this portion into seven parts, giving the thought of complete misery, which so exceeds his former greatness. The first is his wretched mockers (verses 1-8)…
One commentator weighs the verb Job picked for their voices:
"Among the bushes they bray." He will not allow that they talked — they brayed. "Under the nettles they huddle together."
They were real people, pushed out of settled life and living on what the desert gave:
What else could you expect from people who had been gnawing at whatever they could find in the desert? And not in pleasant places either, but in endless wild waste. They pulled up saltwort in the thickets when they could find it. They found food, poor as it was, in the roots of broom or juniper. How sad to think of such degradation for members of the human race even in those early days! We usually connect such outcasts with the crowded slums of vice and crime in some great city. But they were there then too, out of sight, in the life of the desert. … Under the nettles, he adds, they herded together like animals — sons of folly, too obscure for a name, known only for vice and the punishment that came with it.
In the chapter before, Job spoke of helping the poor and the fatherless. Here he speaks of such people with contempt. One commentator asks what that change reveals:
He spoke before of his delivering the poor and the fatherless and those who had no helpers (chapter 29:12). Was it love for them that really moved him? If so, where was his love for this class of people whom apparently he had looked at with contempt? Now they are treating him with contempt, and he feels deeply insulted. Again this shows the pride that Job needed to have broken down, and which was indeed broken down later.
The same writer turns Job's dismissal of their ancestry into a question. He uses an older translation of verse 8, which reads "sons of vile men":
Job does not consider that some such people may not be to blame for their condition, He seems to think they were not worth considering, because they had to scrounge their food from unhealthy sources (verse 4), and were driven from men to live in caves or clefts in the valleys (verses 5-6). For he says, "they were sons of fools, yes, sons of vile men." Can God not save sons of vile men? Indeed He can, and often does.
One commentator sets Job beside a greater Sufferer who was also mocked. He quotes Psalm 69:12 in an older translation:
It is a hideous picture, reminding us of One who in a far different spirit said, "I was the song of the drunkards" (Psalm 69:12). But in Job there is no turning to God in such unjust treatment. Clearly the wound to his pride, in having such a rabble mock him, is the deepest of his mental sufferings.
Loss by itself did not cure this bitterness. Reaching God did:
But remember: much more is needed than being stripped of self and discovering how hollow and deceitful the world is. A person may go through all of that, and the result be nothing but frustration and disappointment. Indeed it can be nothing more if God is not reached… when once Job got into God's presence, there was an end to the egotism of Job 29 and the bitterness of Job 30.
- Scorn — Job is picturing the men who mock him. He gives their voices the word for a donkey's cry, not for human speech.
- Scorned — These mockers were real outcasts. Men had driven them out of settled life, and they lived on desert roots and saltwort.
- Self — Job had spoken of rescuing the helpless. His contempt here exposes pride that still needed breaking — and it was broken later.
- Silence — Another Sufferer, mocked in the same way, met it in a far different spirit. Job never turns to God under the injustice.
- Surrender — Losing everything only leaves bitterness. God's presence ended Job's pride in chapter 29 and his bitterness in chapter 30.
Sons of fools, and sons of nameless sires, they are driven out of the land.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And now I am their song, yea, I am their byword.
Job has been looking back at his former greatness. Now the picture is reversed: the people mocking him come from the lowest ranks of society, and Job has to ask why God is letting it happen.
To be someone's song is to be set to music for other people's amusement. One writer traces what these mockers actually did with Job's name.
And now Job had become their song and their byword. Even people like these — wretched cave-dwellers, if not worse in their origin — dared to make him their entertainment and the object of spiteful abuse. They loathed him so much that they kept far away; and if they did come near, it was to heap on him the lowest mark of shameful contempt.
Job is not being insulted by equals. The pain is sharpened by the standing of the people doing it.
Now Job describes the misery and disgrace he has suddenly been brought down to. First, he dwells on the contempt he had to take — not from the proud and powerful, but from the most wretched and despicable of men. No one was so low that he could not look at Job with mockery and scorn.
Job answers their scorn with scorn of his own. One writer asks what that reveals about him.
Now he turns to the present. He seems to have changed places with these people, or with people like them, and now he in turn speaks of them not with sympathy but with the deepest contempt. Pride speaks of them as those "whose fathers I would have disdained to set with the dogs of my flock." Their elders were beneath his contempt, and now the younger ones laugh at him... It is clear that the wound to his pride, in having such a mob mock him, is the deepest of his mental sufferings.
Another writer looks back at Job's record of kindness to the poor and asks an uncomfortable question about it.
He spoke before of his delivering the poor and the fatherless and those who had no helpers (ch. 29:12). Was it love for them that really moved him? If so, where was his love for this class of people whom apparently he had looked at with contempt? Now they are treating him with contempt, and he feels deeply insulted. Again this shows the pride in Job that needed to be broken — and later it was broken.
The mockery is not the deepest wound. Reading on into the next verses, Job says the reason the crowd has slipped its bridle is that his own cord has been loosed — and he knows whose hand did it.
They could not bear to look at him — at the agony, and the terrible effect of all these sores on his body. They could not go near him... "Because He has loosed my cord." There was, after all, what grieved the heart of poor Job more than anything. It was God. He does not mean the devil; it was not the devil.
Another sufferer met the same treatment and answered it differently. One writer sets the two side by side, and the comparison is not flattering to Job.
However much he scorns them, Job has to admit that they mock him, that he is their song and their byword. We can only compare his anger at their taunts with the meekness of Him "who, when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten."... But He acted as One who did not hear: "I gave my back to those who strike, and my cheeks to those who pull out the beard; I hid not my face from disgrace and spitting" (Isaiah 50:6). Who is it that said this? Not a man mourning over his lost greatness, but One who had given up His glory by His own choice, in love for His enemies.
Job's bitterness gains him nothing. One writer contrasts it with the way Christ met the world's rebuffs.
Mourning over greatness that is gone, and bitter attacks on other people, will not do the heart much good... He could turn from the rebuffs of men to His resources in God, and then come back with those healing words, "Come to me … and I will give you rest."
- Song — Job's name became entertainment. The lowest outcasts made a joke of a suffering man.
- Sting — The hurt is not that they mock him, but who they are. Their fathers were men he would not have set with his sheepdogs.
- Self — The mockery uncovers pride. The man who once rescued the poor now speaks of the poor with contempt, and later that pride was broken.
- Source — Behind the jeering crowd, Job sees God's own hand. That, not the taunting, is his deepest grief.
- Saviour — Christ met the same shame and spitting. He did not threaten back. He turned from men's rebuffs to God, and then offered rest.
They abhor me, they stand aloof from me, yea, they spare not to spit in my face.
Job has just finished remembering his days of honour, when princes stood up for him and the poor blessed him. Now the lowest men in the land avoid him and spit at him, and he has neither his name nor his health left to fall back on.
Kelly traces how far Job has fallen, and who is laughing at him now.
Now Job sets out the misery and degradation he had been suddenly reduced to. First, he dwells on the scorn that fell to him — not from the high and proud, but from the most wretched and despicable of men. No one was so low that he could not look at Job with derision and scorn. It would be hard to find such a picture of utter baseness in the habits of men. Yet he had to endure every expression of malicious contempt from these loathsome people. They set on him not only with their vulgar mockery, but with the coarsest practical jokes and rude behaviour, and it unnerved him completely. But a deeper and more constant sorrow weighed on him. He could not shut out the painful conviction that his endless bodily sufferings came from the hand of God — the very One from whom he might have looked for compassion.
Job had been the helper of such outcasts. Now they have the upper hand, and his tone toward them changes. Commentators differ over which wound cut deepest.
Job's words about his former greatness described his kind pity for wretched outcasts. He comforted and cheered them. Moving to the present, he seems to have changed places with these people, or people like them. Now he speaks of them not with sympathy but with the deepest contempt… These are the contemptible wretches who now mock the man who was once so great… It is a hideous picture, reminding us of One who in a very different spirit said, "The drunkards make songs about me" (Ps. 69:12). But in Job there is no turning to God under such unjust treatment. Clearly the wound to his pride, in having such a rabble mock him, is the deepest of his mental sufferings.
The recoil described in the first half of the verse had a plain physical cause.
"They abhor me." Think of that — these words were all true. "They keep aloof from me." They could not bear to look at him — at the agony, and the terrible effect of all these sores on his body. They could not go near him.
Some translations read "spit in my face" where ESV has "spit at the sight of me." Commentators look past Job to One who met that same treatment.
"They do not hesitate to spit in my face" (v.10). This was true of men's treatment of the Lord Jesus too, but it did not shake His confidence in the living God… In fact, this was similar to the Lord Jesus, whose words in Psalm 69:26 surely speak to us: "They persecute Him whom You have struck." But His case was very different from Job's, because God struck the Lord Jesus for our sins. Men, ignorant of such grace, only used the occasion to heap further abuse on the Son of God. If Job had had the example of the Lord Jesus to consider at that time, he might have thought differently. But Job let men's treatment of him affect him so much that he became virtually unable to look up.
Commentators do not spare Job here. They set his answer beside the way Christ met the same rejection.
Now all this, we may truly say, falls far short of the mark. Laments over lost greatness and bitter attacks on our fellow men will not do the heart much good. They show nothing of the spirit and mind of Christ, and they bring no glory to His holy name. When we turn our eyes toward the blessed Lord Jesus we see something completely different. That meek and lowly One met it all with an "Even so, Father" — all the rebuffs of this world, all the disappointments among His people Israel, all the unbelief and folly of His disciples. He could withdraw from the rebuffs of men into His resources in God. Then He came out with those soothing words: "Come to me… and I will give you rest."
Yet the shame recorded here is not the last word on Job's standing among men.
He was restored to the confidence and esteem of all who had known him before. That is a great point, when we remember his sad complaint in Job 30 about the treatment he had received.
- Scorn — the contempt comes from the bottom of society; no one was too low to look down on Job.
- Sting — the mockery cut his pride, and beneath it lay his belief that God's own hand had done this to him.
- Spittle — they either back away from his diseased body or come close only to degrade him.
- Shadow — the same scorn fell on Christ. He met it without bitterness, and His confidence in God held.
- Sequel — the shame is not the end. Job was restored to the esteem of everyone who had known him.
For he hath loosed my cord and afflicted me; so they cast off the bridle before me.
Job has been listing how low he has fallen. The lowest people in the land now mock him and spit at him. Then he stops blaming them. He names God as the real cause, and the crowd treats that as permission.
One writer notes that the text itself leaves open whose cord is loosed. He reads the whole picture as a siege.
One reading of the text gives "my," that is, Job's, cord. The other gives "His," that is, God's. Ewald takes this as a bowstring, Conant as a rein. The sense seems to be the letting loose of trouble and persecutions. They took their stand on his right, as witnesses against the sufferer. So he lost all firm ground to stand on. He could only compare himself to a place open to every method of siege and assault. The course of his life was broken up by force, and those who helped push on his ruin needed no help themselves. For they poured in as through a wide breach, rolling onward under the crash of ruin.
Job lists the insults, down to being spat at. But the word "because" turns his complaint in a new direction.
"They do not hesitate to spit at the sight of me. Because God has loosed my cord." There, after all, was what grieved the heart of poor Job more than anything. It was God. He does not mean the devil; it was not the devil.
Job reads the crowd's logic: God has struck this man, so he is fair game. One commentator draws out what that same logic did to Christ.
Job thought God had afflicted him, and that this was why "the rabble" had cast off restraint (v.11). They saw in Job a chance to vent their evil tempers against him. In fact, this was similar to the Lord Jesus, whose words in Psalm 69:26 surely speak to us: "They persecute Him whom you have struck down." But His case was very different from Job's. God struck the Lord Jesus because of our sins. Men, ignorant of such grace, only used the occasion to heap further abuse on the Son of God.
The same insult fell on Job and on Christ. The difference lies in how each answered it.
We can only compare his anger at their taunts with the meekness of Him "who when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten." All through life, the shadows of man's rejection fell on our Lord. But in His darkest hour — "your hour, and the power of darkness" — they poured out their curses and their taunts. But He acted like One who did not hear: "I gave my back to those who strike, and my cheeks to those who pull out the beard; I hid not my face from disgrace and spitting" (Isa. 50:6). Who is it that said this? Not a man mourning his lost greatness. This was One who gave up His glory by His own choice, out of love for His enemies. He could have delivered Himself from His troubles at any moment.
This verse sits inside a chapter of stripping. One writer warns that being stripped is not enough on its own.
But remember: much more is needed than the stripping of self and the discovery of how hollow and deceitful the world is. A person may go through all of these, and the result be merely disappointment and a sour spirit. Indeed it can be nothing more if God is not reached. If the heart does not find its all-satisfying portion in God, a reverse of fortune leaves it desolate. The discovery of how fickle and hollow people are fills it with bitterness. This accounts for Job's language in Job 30... when once Job got into God's presence, there was an end to the self-absorption of Job 29 and the bitterness of Job 30.
- Loosed — the cord is an image of restraint taken away. Commentators differ on whether it is Job's cord or God's, but the sense is trouble and persecution let loose.
- Traced — Job looks past the mockers to God. What grieved him most was not the spitting but the hand behind it.
- Licensed — Job thought the crowd threw off restraint because God had afflicted him. They saw his suffering as their chance to vent their evil tempers.
- Contrasted — the same treatment met Christ. God struck Him because of our sins, and men used the occasion to heap more abuse on Him.
- Unfinished — stripping alone yields only bitterness. Job's bitterness ended when he reached God's presence.
At [my] right hand rise the young brood; they push away my feet, and raise up against me their pernicious ways;
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
They mar my path, they set forward my calamity, without any to help them;
In Job's last long speech, mockery hardens into open attack. Weak and helpless men now pile onto a broken man. The verse raises two hard questions: why do his attackers "need no one to help them," and why does Job speak of this cruelty as though God stood behind it?
Job pictures his attackers tearing up his ordinary way of life and speeding his ruin along. One commentator points out who does what here:
"They break up my path, they promote my calamity." He is clearly thinking of these mockers as set on throwing his normal path into confusion. They promote — that is, increase — the calamity the Lord had brought on him. The crushing weight of it felt to him like sea waves rolling over him in a violent storm (vv.13-14).
The last clause is the puzzling one. Read as a comment on the attackers, it means their work needs no outside help. One writer sets it inside a picture of a place under siege:
So he was left with no firm ground to stand on. He could only compare himself to a place open to every method of siege and assault. The steady course of his life was violently broken up, and those who helped to hurry on his ruin needed no help themselves. They poured in as through a wide breach, rolling forward under the crash of ruin. A crowd of terrors turned on him. Each one chased his dignity away like a hurricane, and his prosperity vanished like mist.
The attack lands where Job is weakest. One writer reads the torn-up path as an assault on a man whose footing had already slipped:
These weak, helpless men now turn on him with violence. They tear down his path — they destroy the way of a man whose footsteps had "almost slipped." They would add to his downfall. They burst on him like a flood breaking through the banks that held it back; they roll over him with the deafening noise of their tramping… This is beautiful poetry, full of bold images. But Job does not show himself at his best. His weak spirit shows in the lack of dignity with which he bears his misfortunes. Clearly his faith is in eclipse.
Job does not treat the rabble as the real source of his pain. Just above this verse he traces his humiliation to a hand that loosened his cord:
"They do not hold back from spitting in my face. Because He has loosed my cord." That, after all, was what grieved the heart of poor Job more than anything. It was God. He does not mean the devil; it was not the devil.
One writer weighs Job's outpouring, then sets a very different response beside it:
Mourning over greatness that is gone, and bitter attacks on our fellow men, will not do the heart much good. They show nothing of the spirit and mind of Christ, and they bring no glory to His holy name… That gentle and humble One met every rebuff of this world, every disappointment among His people Israel, and all the unbelief and folly of His disciples with one answer: "Even so, Father." He could withdraw from the insults of men into His resources in God, and then come out again with those soothing words, "Come to me … and I will give you rest."
Job was sure God's hand lay behind it all, yet he could not read that hand. One commentator puts the reason in Job himself, not in God:
He mourns his terrible state. Up to this point he cannot hold back the words: he thinks God is dealing harshly with him, and acting without reason. He cannot understand God's ways at all. He does not take in God's motive — the gracious purpose behind it. In short, he had not reached the end of the Lord, because he had not done with himself. That is the real secret of it.
- Breach. Job's life is a walled city with a hole in it. They tear up his path, hurry his ruin along, and need no help to finish the job.
- Blow. The blow lands on a man whose footing had already slipped. He answers with contempt rather than trust. His faith, in one writer's phrase, is in eclipse.
- Behind. The spitting rabble did not crush Job. What crushed him was his conviction that God had loosened his cord.
- Better. Christ met the same insults by withdrawing into His resources in God, then came back offering rest. Job's lament falls far short.
- Beyond. The siege was not arbitrary. Job had not reached the end of the Lord because he had not yet finished with himself.
They come in as through a wide breach amid the confusion they roll themselves onward.
Job's last long speech turns from the honour he once had to the ruin he lives in now, where mockery from the lowest men in the land becomes something closer to a military assault. Who are these attackers, and why does Job feel that God has torn open the wall around his life?
The verse borrows its language from siege warfare.
Job could see that God's hand was behind all the humiliation he suffered… He had no firm ground left to stand on. So he could only compare himself to a place exposed to every method of siege and assault. The ordinary course of his life was broken up by force, and those who helped to hurry on his ruin needed no help themselves. For they poured in as through a wide breach, rolling onward under the crash of ruin. Meanwhile a crowd of terrors turned on him. Each one chased his dignity away like a hurricane, and his prosperity vanished like vapour.
The men overrunning Job are weak and helpless. One writer traces how their scorn grows into a flood.
The scorn and mockery, which we have seen growing more violent, now bursts out in a storm of persecution. These puny, helpless men turn on him in violence. They tear down his path — they destroy the road of one whose footsteps had almost slipped already. They would add to his overthrow. They burst upon him like a flood breaking through the banks that held it back. They roll over him with the deafening noise of their tramping. Like a pack of cowardly wolves they pounce on the fallen man, whose nobility is swept aside as by a fierce hurricane.
What wounds Job most is not the crowd. He traces their boldness back to God's own hand on him.
Job considered that, because God had afflicted him, therefore "the rabble" had cast off restraint (v.11), seeing in Job an opportunity to vent their evil tempers against him. In fact, this was similar to the Lord Jesus. His words in Psalm 69:26 speak to us: "For they persecute him whom you have struck down." But His case was very different from Job's. God struck the Lord Jesus because of our sins. Men, ignorant of such grace, only used the occasion to heap further abuse on the Son of God.
Job answers the attack with lament and with attacks of his own. One writer measures that response against Christ's.
Now all this, we may truly say, falls very far short of the mark. Mourning over departed greatness and bitter attacks on our fellow-men will not do the heart much good. Nor do they show anything of the spirit and mind of Christ, or bring glory to His holy name. When we turn our eyes toward the blessed Lord Jesus we see something completely different. That meek and lowly One met all the insults of this world, all the disappointments among His people Israel, all the unbelief and folly of His disciples, with an "Even so, Father." He was able to withdraw from the insults of men into His resources in God. Then He came forth with those soothing words, "Come to me… and I will give you rest."
Job is right that God's hand is in this, and wrong about what that hand is doing. One writer finds the reason inside Job himself.
He mourns his terrible state. Up to this point he could not hold back from saying it: he thought God dealt harshly with him and was arbitrary. He could not understand His ways at all. He did not take in the motive God had — the gracious purpose. In short, he had not reached the end the Lord had in view, because he had not finished with himself. That is the real secret of it.
- The breach — Job pictures his life as a walled city with its defences broken open. His attackers pour through the gap and roll onward.
- The flood — Those pouring in are the weakest men in the land. They burst on him like water through collapsed banks, and trample a man whose footing had already almost gone.
- The hand — What hurts most is not the crowd but Job's conviction behind it. He believes God lifted the restraint, and the mob read that as permission.
- The contrast — Christ met the insults of this world with "Even so, Father." Job answers with lament and counter-attack, and gains nothing by it.
- The purpose — Job calls God arbitrary because he has not yet finished with himself. Until he is, he cannot see the gracious purpose behind the breach.
Terrors are turned against me; they pursue mine honour as the wind; and my welfare is passed away like a cloud.
Job has moved from remembering his former greatness to describing the mob that now mocks him. Here the description turns inward. Why should a godly man lose his honour like this — and whose hand did Job see behind it?
The verse ends a run of siege pictures. One writer carries them through to the terrors:
They poured in as through a wide breach, rolling onward under the crash of ruin. Meanwhile a crowd of terrors turned on him. Each one chased his dignity away like a hurricane, and his prosperity vanished like vapour.
Older translations read this word as "soul." One commentator prefers "nobility," then weighs how Job bore the blow:
Like a pack of cowardly wolves they pounce on the fallen man. His soul — or rather his "nobility" — is swept aside as if by a fierce hurricane: "my prosperity has passed away like a cloud." This is beautiful poetry, full of bold images. But Job does not show himself at his best. His weak spirit shows in how little dignity he keeps while he suffers. His faith is in eclipse.
So he loses twice: the standing others gave him, and the dignity he might have shown in losing it.
Job does not spend the verse cursing the rabble. The storm he feels comes from higher up, and he had said so repeatedly:
In all his sufferings Job felt the hand of God upon him, as he had often said. He links this with the scorn of these low men, who used God's dealings with him as their excuse to pour out their hatred: "God has forsaken him; pursue and seize him."
The same writer sets Job's anger beside Another who was mocked:
We can only compare his anger at their taunts with the meekness of Him "who, when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten." … But He acted as One who did not hear. He "gave His back to those who strike, and His cheeks to those who pull out the beard; I hid not My face from disgrace and spitting" (Isa. 50:6). Who said this? Not a man mourning his lost greatness. This was One who had willingly given up His glory out of love for His enemies. At any moment He could have freed Himself from His troubles, by asking His Father or by using His own power.
Chapter 29 shows what Job's honour rested on: what he had been to other people. That is the ground God removed.
In chapter 29 we clearly see that he had been walking in the sense of blessings from God, and in part in the sense of the fruits of grace in his heart. He was resting in what he was to others, and not in the favour of God Himself. … So God goes on dealing with Job, till He brings him to nothing in the very thing he was most famous for. … Because we must be broken down — we must come to a sense of what we are, as well as of what we have done. Then God can deal with us out of His own heart.
So what looks cruel is not. Another writer answers the charge with a question:
Is it cruel of the Lord to deal this way with a poor broken-hearted creature? Let us rather ask: would it have been kind to leave him wearing his pride like a coat, and shouting against the Almighty? Only one thing humbles pride — coming face to face with its own nothingness before the majesty and boundless goodness of God.
The image of a passing cloud is not only about loss. Job's case ends elsewhere:
This godly man needed to be brought low so that he could be lifted up. He had to learn the sentence of death on everything here, so that he might fully trust the God who raises the dead.
- Terrors. A crowd of terrors turns on Job. They chase his dignity away like a hurricane, and his prosperity vanishes like vapour.
- Honour. The word can also mean "nobility." The wind takes his standing among men — and, one writer notes, the dignity he might have shown in losing it.
- Hand. Job traces the storm to God, not to the mockers. The mockers only used God's dealings as an excuse for their hatred.
- Contrast. Another Sufferer met spitting and taunts without answering back — and He had laid His glory down by choice.
- Purpose. Job rested in what he was to others. So God brought him to nothing in the very thing he was famous for — brought low so that he could be lifted up.
And now my soul is poured out in me; days of affliction have taken hold upon me.
Job has spoken of his past greatness. Now he turns to his present misery, and describes how the suffering feels from the inside. The verse raises a question: what does a man do with his own soul when it drains away?
One writer walks through the scene Job paints, and then points out what Job never says:
His soul is poured out, and days of suffering are his portion. The nights are no better, for the gnawing disease does not sleep as it bares his bones out of his very flesh. His clothing is no longer a decoration. It hangs on his wasted body, and his collar shows the poor bony neck. The whole scene is as vivid as a picture, and just as sickening. Job lays all this at God's door. It is His great power that has worn him away like this and laid his honour in the dust... Do we hear him taking counsel with his soul in this time of suffering? — "Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you in turmoil within me? Hope in God; for I shall again praise Him, my salvation and my God" (Ps. 42:11). No; instead of encouraging himself in this way, he accuses his Maker.
The second half of the verse uses the language of capture. One rendering of the Hebrew brings out that the days of pain have Job in their grip and will not let him go:
And now my soul pours itself out upon me; days of suffering hold me fast.
The pain in Job's body is not his only wound. One writer hears something else running through the whole chapter:
He had spoken of his past greatness and now he describes his present misery. Ah, the bitterness of it — those younger than I laugh at me! Sadly, through it all we hear nothing but pride. He scorns those who were so much beneath him. Then he describes his affliction: days of affliction have taken hold of him, and the pains that gnaw him take no rest.
Job traces his suffering to God. One writer calls that instinct half right and half wrong:
It is good that he recognises this: whatever suffering he has, and whatever its source, God is the One who has allowed it. But Job ought to have realised that God would not allow it if it was not going to be of pure blessing to Job in the end. Later he did realise the truth of Romans 8:28: "And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to His purpose." But at that moment his disaster so overwhelmed him that he would not give God credit for being who He is.
Job's sorrow was not over yet. One writer puts the reason in Job himself:
He mourns over his terrible state. Up to now he could not stop saying that, in his view, God was treating him harshly and acting without reason. He could not understand His ways at all. He did not take in the motive God had — the gracious purpose. In short, he had not reached the end of the Lord, because he had not done with himself. That is the real secret of it.
One writer describes the tenderness at work behind Job's sorrow, which Job could not yet see:
Poor Job. He little knew the tenderness of the heart that was leading him to sound the depths of his own mind.
- Poured out. Job's soul drains away and days of suffering are his portion; here he turns from past greatness to present misery.
- Poured where? Instead of taking counsel with his soul as the psalm does — "Hope in God" — he accuses his Maker.
- Pride under the pain. His bitterness is not only in the body. Younger men now laugh at him, and pride runs through all he says.
- The right instinct. Job is right to trace everything back to God's hand. But he will not credit God with the goodness behind it.
- The delay explained. He had not reached the end of the Lord because he had not yet done with himself. The tenderness leading him there was the one thing he could not see.
The night pierceth through my bones [and detacheth them] from me, and my gnawing pains take no rest
Job's last long speech moves from his past glory to his present misery, and verse 17 is its darkest point. Night comes, the pain digs deeper instead of easing, and the question pressed on us is who Job believed was behind it.
Night usually gives even a wretched man a pause. For Job it did the reverse, and one writer traces how — down to the gnawing the verse names.
He was completely unnerved, and his soul dissolved, as it were, in sorrow, while days of suffering held him fast. The night usually gives a break to the most miserable, but it made his misery worse. It pierced his bones, as if they were being picked out of him. And the gnawers of his flesh not only began their work before the time, but did it without sleeping.
The disease wrecked more than his sleep. Another writer sets the night pain beside the next verse: Job's own clothes no longer fitted him.
In these verses Job describes the agony of his suffering (vv.16-17). His soul is poured out, his very bones seem to pierce him in the night, and the pain never lets up. His clothing was no longer a fitting adornment. It had lost its shape because his body had wasted away, so the collar of his coat no longer fitted.
Job no longer blames the men who mocked him. He lays his suffering at God's door, and one writer says he was right to — but that he stopped half a step short.
But he no longer talks now of the persecution of callous men: rather, he attributes his sufferings to God, saying, "He has cast me into the mire, and I have become like dust and ashes" (v.19). It is good that he recognises that whatever suffering he may have and from whatever source, God is the One who has allowed it. But Job ought to have realised that God would not allow it if it was not going to be of pure blessing to Job in the end. Later he did realise the truth of Romans 8:28: "And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to His purpose." But at that moment he was so overwhelmed by his calamity that he would not give God credit for being who He is.
From this bed of pain Job cries out and hears nothing back. What he then concludes about God's character is where one writer marks his failure, and points to the love Job could not yet see.
He cries to Him for help, but no answer comes from above. He stands in all his wretchedness before God, who looks on him but does not pity. God does look at him, yet He remains unmoved by his sufferings. "You change Yourself to a cruel being toward me." Oh, if Job had only known the tender love which would have spared him all this suffering, except that it was for his own good! ... Job sees nothing ahead of him but death, the house appointed for all living. His faith seems to have suffered a great eclipse.
The same writer names the cause behind that eclipse, and applies it beyond Job to any believer.
Job is occupied with the wrong person. Even if everything he said were true — and we have no reason to doubt it was sincerely spoken — it does not suit a man to dwell on his own condition... for a child of God to follow the same course shows clearly that he has not yet learned his lesson.
Later in the book, Elihu describes how God deals with a man who will not hear His word. One writer shows that the description fits Job's sleepless bones.
But God has another way of speaking to men. If they do not listen to His word, He may send them His rod. In enlarging on this, Elihu practically describes the case of Job. Severe chastening pains come on him, and his bones seem to wither in mortal struggle. "My bones are pierced in me, and my sinews take no rest" (Job 30:17).
(The writers quote an older translation. The ESV reads, "The night racks my bones, and the pain that gnaws me takes no rest.")
He then puts a question to Job, and to us:
Can he not at least see that God is speaking in the affliction and that He has something to say?
- Night — the hours that usually bring a break made Job's misery worse. The gnawing pain never slept, and his bones felt as if they were picked out of him.
- Hand — Job traced the suffering to God, not to the men who mocked him. That much was good.
- Mistake — he stopped there and decided God had turned cruel. He should have trusted that God allowed it only because pure blessing would come of it — a truth he saw later.
- Cause — his faith went into eclipse while he was occupied with the wrong person. Dwelling on his own state shows a man has not yet learned his lesson.
- Voice — when a man will not listen to God's word, God may send the rod. The question for Job, and for us, is whether we can hear that God is speaking and has something to say.
By their great force they have become my raiment; they bind me about as the collar of my coat.
Job's lament now turns to his own body. Disease has wasted him so far that even his clothes no longer sit right on him. Behind the picture lies a harder question. Job traces the ruin to God's own hand, and the way he says it lays his soul bare.
Clothing tells the story of the body inside it. One reading takes the garment as hanging shapeless on a wasted frame:
His garment was no longer a fine covering. It had become disfigured because his body was so wasted away, and the collar of his coat no longer fitted him.
Commentators differ on the detail. Another reading takes the "great force" as the violence needed to get the clothing off at all, the cloth clinging to his sores:
His body was in such a state that only the greatest force could get his clothing changed. It clung round him as tightly as the collar of a close-fitting garment.
The text never names the illness, and attempts to identify it remain guesses:
We do not need to know the exact nature of the disease that fell on Job. Some have thought it was leprosy, the most hopeless, disgusting and deadly of all human illnesses. Others have named it elephantiasis, a repulsive and frightening disease in which every part of the body suffers. It twists and swells the limbs, which is where its name comes from, and it spreads a rotting inflammation through the whole body.
Notice the pronoun. Job does not blame the disease. He blames God:
It is all as vivid as a picture, and as repulsive. Job lays all of it at God's door. It is His great force that has wasted him away and laid his honour in the dust. He has brought him into the mire and made him as worthless as the dust and ashes he sits in. Do we hear him talking with his own soul in this time of suffering? — "Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you in turmoil within me? Hope in God; for I shall again praise Him, my salvation and my God" (Ps. 42:11). No. Instead of encouraging himself like that, he accuses his Maker.
Job was right to trace it to God. He would not take the next step:
It is good that he recognises this. Whatever suffering he has, and from whatever source, God is the One who has allowed it. But Job ought to have realised that God would not allow it if it was not going to be of pure blessing to Job in the end. Later he did realise the truth of Romans 8:28, "And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to His purpose."
Just after this Job says he cries out and gets no answer. That silence was not God's absence:
He cries to God but is not heard. Of course God heard him, but God answers only at the right time and in the right way. Had God become cruel to him? He thought so, but it was the love of God that delayed an answer. What he considered God's hand strong against him was really the strength of God's love for him.
Someone real stands behind the ruined body, and God fixed his limit:
God had given Satan permission to do his worst, short of taking his life. With evil skill Satan reduced his body to a state of disgusting disease that, we suppose, no man has suffered before or since. In any other case the victim would have died before so much bodily trouble could build up. Let us not judge Job harshly. In such a dreadful plight as his we would likely have said far worse things than he did.
The suffering does what comfort never could. It brings what is hidden in Job to the surface:
God sends the discipline to set self aside, and to bring the heart into its true relationship with Him, apart from self. So the effect of the discipline is to expose the secret workings and feelings of self. Otherwise they would never be spotted or known, and what is not known is never given up. ... Job little knew the place he held before God, or how God was preparing him, through terrible sufferings, to prove to Satan that His own estimate of him was right.
- The garment. Job's clothes no longer fit his wasted body. Commentators differ: some say the garment hangs shapeless, others say it clings so tight that only great force can pull it off.
- The hand. Job rightly traces the affliction to God, but then accuses his Maker instead of hoping in Him.
- The limit. God let Satan go to the very edge of Job's life and no further.
- The silence. God did hear; the delayed answer was love, not cruelty.
- The purpose. The pressure exposes what self hides, so Job can let it go — and God can prove Satan wrong about him.
He hath cast me into the mire, and I have become like dust and ashes.
Job's lament reaches its lowest point here. The man who once sat as a prince among his people now says he has been flung into the mud. Two questions press. What has happened to him, and why does he say God did it?
The words Job uses have a settled meaning in the Bible. Ashes stand for grief, and also for being reduced to nothing.
Ashes, usually from burnt wood, served as a sign of sorrow or mourning. People put them on the head, or on the body with sackcloth, or spread them on a couch to lie on. To eat ashes expresses great sorrow, and to be reduced to ashes is a picture of complete destruction. "Dust and ashes" was the figure Abraham used of himself before the LORD, and Job said he had become like them by the hand of God.
This is not only poetry. Disease has stripped Job of everything that made him look like a man of standing.
His soul is poured out, and days of suffering are his lot. The nights are no better, for the gnawing disease does not sleep as it bares his bones out of his very flesh. His clothing no longer adorns him. It clings to his wasted body, and his collar shows the poor bony neck. It is all vivid as a picture, and as repulsive. All this Job ascribes to God. It is His great force that has wasted him away and laid his honour in the dust. He has brought him into the mire and made him as worthless as the dust and ashes in which he sits.
Job stops speaking of cruel men and names God as the cause. That move is half right and half wrong.
He no longer talks of the persecution of callous men. Instead he traces his sufferings to God, saying, "God has cast me into the mire, and I have become like dust and ashes." It is good that he recognises one thing. Whatever his suffering, and whatever its source, God is the One who has allowed it. But Job ought to have realised that God would not allow it if it was not going to be of pure blessing to Job in the end. Later he did realise the truth of Romans 8:28: "And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose." But at that moment his disaster overwhelmed him. He would not give God credit for being who He is.
Satan had a hand in Job's ruin. Yet Job's words point past him, and that is where the comfort lies.
God loves His saints too well to leave in them anything that dishonours Him and that they cannot see in themselves. Such a thing would block the fullest blessing. So in grace He uses trial to bring that blessing about. He gives us a comfort beyond words. Satan is not the one who plans and carries things out. God Himself does, and He does it in perfect wisdom and righteousness, and as the God of grace too. That holds despite these huge calamities, which sin has brought in, and which He allows Satan to wield against His servants.
The bitterness of this chapter has a root in the one before it.
Then the will comes in (Job 29), tied to self, and it makes self the centre — sadly — even while God is owned. Compare that chapter of conscience before God with his self-satisfaction: satisfaction with himself, in his own eyes and before men. And then see how (Job 30) pride, contempt of others, being taken up with evil, and love of self all break out.
Job says here that he has become dust and ashes. Later he takes that same place by choice.
The LORD's voice out of the whirlwind ceased, and Job humbled himself in full measure. He confessed the wrongness of his former words. He had to despise himself and repent in the place of death — dust and ashes. These moments in the presence of God had produced a result which all the talk of the three friends, and even of Elihu, had not achieved. This man stood out among men, and God Himself had spoken well of him. Yet he had now discovered his own utter sinfulness, down in the deepest springs of his being. A discovery we all in our turn have to make.
That end was never in doubt, even while Job was in the mire.
If, in the presence of suffering and wrongs, we patiently endure, we shall find that in the end, "the Lord is compassionate and merciful." Job's case is specially instructive, as in his troubles we learn that, whatever trials we are permitted to pass through, God uses them for our discipline.
Hamilton Smith (older translations read "very pitiful, and of tender mercy")
- Mire — the words describe a real, ruined body: disease has stripped Job's flesh and laid his honour in the dust.
- Ashes — the picture carries two senses: deep mourning, and being reduced to nothing. Abraham used the same words of himself before God.
- Hand — Job is right to trace the blow past men and past Satan to God, and wrong to conclude God is therefore against him.
- Self — the bitterness here grows out of the self-focus of the chapter before. Pride and contempt break out together.
- End — what Job says he has become here, he will later choose: to repent in dust and ashes, once he has met God.
I cry unto thee, and thou answerest me not; I stand up, and thou lookest at me.
Job is no longer arguing with his friends. He turns to God, and meets silence — then something worse. God looks on, and does not seem moved. His complaint raises the hardest question a sufferer can ask: has God changed toward me?
Job says God gives him no answer. William Kelly quotes an older translation, which reads "you do not hear me." He separates hearing from answering:
There is no reference to his three friends now. He is looking at this tremendous trial that afflicted his body, and that exposed him to all this disrespect and contempt from the very lowest people on earth. "I cry to you and you do not hear me." But God did hear him. There was a reason why He did not answer; but God did hear. "I stand up, and you do not regard me. You have become cruel to me." There he was quite wrong.
Some translations read the second half as "you do not regard me." The ESV has "you only look at me." One writer argues that the second is right, and that this is what makes the complaint so bitter:
He cries to Him for help, but no answer comes from above. He stands in all his wretchedness before God, who looks upon him but does not pity. This is the force of verse 20. It is not merely "You do not regard me." The negative is not in the original. God does regard him: He looks upon him and remains unmoved by his sufferings. "You change Yourself into a cruel being toward me."
Men had already turned cruel to Job. In verse 20 he says the same of God. One commentator asks us to be slow in blaming him:
In verse 20 however he turned to God and made bitter complaint to Him, and even against Him. He felt that He had opposed him and cast him down and disregarded his prayers and pleas, and so had "become cruel" to him. Poor Job! Without any question men had become cruel to him. He now felt that God had become cruel too… Let us not judge Job harshly. In such a fearful plight as his we should probably have said far worse things than he.
There was another way to speak in the dark. Ridout sets Job's words beside a psalmist who questioned his own soul instead of God:
Do we hear him taking counsel with his soul in this time of suffering? — "Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you in turmoil within me? Hope in God" (Psalm 42:11). No; instead of encouraging himself in this way, he accuses his Maker.
Job read the silence as proof that God had turned against him. Another commentator reads it the other way. What Job counted as cruelty was care:
What seems the most devastating misery for Job is that he considers God is against him. He cries to God but is not heard (v.20). Of course God heard him, but God answers only at the right time and in the right way. Had God become cruel to him? He thought so, but it was the love of God that delayed an answer. What he considered God's hand strong against him was really the strength of God's love for him.
Job could not see the end of his own story while he sat in the ashes. That end changes how his suffering reads:
Job did not feel happy when he was tested almost beyond what he could bear. He was happy in this: he was in the Lord's care, and the Lord was leading him to a sure and certain goal of blessing. For the present his affliction was not joyful but painful. Yet it was about to yield him the peaceful fruit of righteousness, because it was training him. We see the Lord's purpose in the last chapters of Job's history. There he is restored to blessing and to the Lord's favour: the discipline had done its work, and God blessed the close of his life more than its beginning.
Commentators differ here. Ridout calls Job's outlook unbelief, and traces it to how taken up with himself Job is in these chapters. Hole asks us not to judge him at all.
- Cry — God heard Job, but did not answer him. Hearing and answering are not the same, and Job could not see God's reason for the delay.
- Gaze — the deeper wound is not that God ignored him. God looked on and seemed unmoved, and Job says God has changed into a cruel being toward him.
- Transfer — men had turned cruel to him first. In verse 20 he says the same of God. When people turn cruel, the heart is quick to accuse God too.
- Reversal — the hand Job read as strong against him was the strength of God's love. The delay was love choosing the right time and the right way.
- End — Job judged God by the middle of his story. The last chapters show him restored and blessed, with the discipline over and its purpose reached.
Thou art changed to a cruel one to me; with the strength of thy hand thou pursuest me.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Thou liftest me up to the wind; thou causest me to be borne away, and dissolvest my substance.
Job has fallen from honour into contempt. Here he turns from the men who mock him to God Himself, and pictures himself snatched up by a gale and blown apart. Was his reading of God true?
The storm is not weather; it is Job's circumstances, and he feels God has put him out in them on purpose.
"You lift me up on the wind" (v.22) — that is, God was exposing Job to the cruel winds of circumstances. So He had blocked any possibility of success for the poor sufferer. All he could look for now was the pain of death (v.23), which he speaks of as "the house appointed for all living."
William Kelly fills out the picture. Job's dread is not only pain, but being undone altogether.
He dared to say that the God who had once blessed him was now turning Himself into a cruel being toward him. He was making war on him with all His might. He was lifting him up into a storm-chariot and sweeping him away, only to dissolve his very being all the more completely. So that he knew it was God bringing him to death, and to the house where living men gather at last.
Two verses earlier Job says he cries and gets no answer. One writer points out that the Hebrew of that line does not say God ignores him — it says God looks on.
He stands in all his wretchedness before God, who looks upon him but does not pity. This is the force of verse 20. It is not merely "You do not regard me"; the negative is not in the original. God does regard him, in the sense of looking upon him and remaining unmoved by his sufferings. "You change Yourself into a cruel being toward me." Oh, if Job had only known that tender love! It would have spared him all this suffering, except that the suffering was for his own good.
Kelly does not soften the charge Job makes here. He marks it as false, and Job's forecast of his own death as false too.
"I cry to you and you do not hear me." But God did hear him. There was a reason why He did not answer; but God did hear... "You have become cruel to me." There he was quite wrong... "For I know that you will bring me to death" — there he was wrong again. God had good things in store for Job.
The same misreading is put even more sharply by another writer, who names what Job did not know rather than what he felt.
He brings in God again. "You do not answer me!" Heaven had been silent to all his pleas. What a dreadful charge: "You are turned to be cruel to me; with the might of Your hand You persecute me!" He thinks himself completely forsaken, not knowing that God's thoughts towards him were thoughts of love and peace.
Job took the pressure as hostility. It was the opposite.
He cries to God but is not heard (v.20). Of course God heard him, but God answers only at the right time and in the right way. Had God become cruel to him? He thought so, but it was the love of God that delayed an answer. What he considered God's hand strong against him was really the strength of God's love for him.
The chapter is magnificent poetry. Samuel Ridout still judges the state of soul behind it, and names a cause.
This is the stormy wind that lifts the frail sufferer up like chaff and drives him along to vanish in the warring storm. Beautiful poetry indeed, but this is wretched unbelief. Job sees nothing before him but death, the house appointed for all living. His faith seems to have suffered a great eclipse. May we not see the reason for this in the self-occupation that marks these two chapters and the next?
Job expected the storm to finish him. The end of his story was something else.
Job did not feel happy when he was tempted almost beyond what he could bear. But he was happy in this: he was in the Lord's care, and the Lord was leading him to a sure and certain goal of blessing... "The end of the Lord" comes in the last chapters of Job's history. There we are allowed to see him restored to blessing and to the favour of the Lord.
- Storm — Job pictures God lifting him into a chariot of wind to sweep him away and dissolve his very being. The wind is his own circumstances, and God has exposed him to them.
- Silence — God was looking on and hearing all along; the delay was in the answering, not in the listening.
- Charge — "You have become cruel to me" is recorded, not approved. One writer calls it wrong, and calls Job's certainty of death wrong too.
- Cause — Job's faith went dark. One writer traces that to how taken up he is with himself in these chapters.
- End — the strong hand he felt against him was the strength of God's love. The close of the book shows the blessing it was driving him toward.
For I know that thou wilt bring me to death, and into the house of assemblage for all living.
Job has finished recalling his better days, and now he turns his lament on God. He has worked out where God is taking him, and it is the grave.
The closing words name a destination nobody escapes. One commentator says the thought should have calmed Job, not crushed him.
"You lift me up to the wind" (v. 22) — that is, God was exposing Job to the cruel winds of circumstance. So He had blocked any possibility of success for the poor sufferer. All he could look for now was the pain of death (v. 23), which he speaks of as "the house appointed for all living." This fact itself should have calmed him. It should have made him realise that his case was not unique: others were appointed to the same end.
One translator renders the closing words as "the house of assembly for all living" — the grave pictured as the place where the whole human family gathers.
Job's words sound like settled knowledge. One commentator goes through the chapter line by line and marks where he was wrong.
"I cry to you and you do not hear me." But God did hear him. There was a reason why He did not answer; but God did hear. "I stand up, and you do not regard me. You have become cruel to me." There he was quite wrong... "For I know that you will bring me to death" — there he was wrong again. God had good things in store for Job.
Job's worst pain was not his body. It was his reading of God's intentions, and that reading was the exact opposite of the truth.
What seems the most devastating misery for Job is that he considers God is against him... God answers only at the right time and in the right way. Had God become cruel to him? He thought so, but it was the love of God that delayed an answer. What he considered God's hand strong against him was in fact the strength of God's love for him.
Before we judge him, one writer asks us to picture the condition he was speaking from.
In verse 20 he turned to God and made bitter complaint to Him, and even against Him... Poor Job! Without any question men had become cruel to him, and he now felt that God had become cruel also... Let us not judge Job harshly. In such a fearful plight as his we should probably have said far worse things than he.
Job read his decline as a death sentence. One writer points to Elihu, a later speaker in the book, who treats the same suffering as God speaking.
But God has another way of speaking to men. If they do not listen to His word, He may send them His rod. In enlarging on this, Elihu is in effect describing the case of Job... He is at the end of life, drawing near to the grave, or to the more dreadful "pit of destruction." "I know that You will bring me to death, and to the house appointed for all living" (Job 30:23).
The chapter ends with no light. One commentator traces that to what fills the speech.
His words are an expression of the deepest gloom. The cause is the bright past he had enjoyed by God's favour, which had taken too much of the place of God Himself in his soul... No solution of the riddle appears yet. Instead the difficulty grows, and God is hidden even more, the longer he dwells on the circumstances of past and present with a conscience on which no evil lay. For all this is but self, not God; and we must humble ourselves under His mighty hand if we want Him to lift us up at the right time.
Job's sentence is the inheritance every child of Adam receives. One writer sets it beside what comes through Christ.
From Adam what have we received?... for an inheritance, a life of sorrow and frustration; for a prospect, death and "the house appointed for all living" (Job 30:23)... Blessed be God, this condition is not beyond remedy. Another Man has been found who was obedient to death. Through Him we receive something very unlike what our first parents passed down to us: a nature which cannot sin, an inheritance which cannot fade away, and a prospect of life beyond death. More than that, we receive the assurance of everlasting life. The grave cannot cheat us of it, and the great enemy cannot take it from us.
- Appointed. The grave is the house kept for everyone, and Job's own words should have told him his case was not unique.
- Wrong. He said "I know," but he did not know — God had good things in store for him.
- Love. The hand he read as cruelty was in fact the strength of God's love. God did hear him, and answered at the right time.
- Self. The gloom deepened because the speech was full of Job, not God. God lifts up those who humble themselves under His hand.
- Christ. Adam passed down death. Through the Man who was obedient to death comes an inheritance the grave cannot touch.
Indeed, no prayer [availeth] when he stretcheth out [his] hand though they cry when he destroyeth.
Job's lament reaches its lowest point here. The wording is among the hardest in the book. Does Job mean that prayer is useless once God's hand falls? Or that a man buried in ruin reaches out for help? Either way, one question sits behind it: does the sufferer's cry reach God at all?
One writer sets out both readings side by side. One is despair. The other is an appeal:
The meaning of verse 24 is obscure in the older version. One translation reads: "No prayer avails when He stretches out His hand; though they cry when He destroys." That is, it is useless to cry to Him for pity. He will not regard the prayer of those He is set on destroying. It is a most hopeless view of God, of which Job has shown he is quite capable. Delitzsch, however, renders it as though Job is explaining his cries. Is it not natural for one to reach out his hand for help? So he translates: "Does not one, however, stretch out the hand in falling; does he not raise a cry for help on that account, in his ruin?" This suits what follows. He is only asking what he had shown to others in their time of stress. He has wept for those in trouble and grieved for the needy.
On the second reading, the heap of ruins is Job himself. He asks whether God would keep striking something already flattened:
Would God deal harshly with a heap of ruins? Job hardly thought this would be the case, yet he felt himself to be only that (v.24). Why should he continue to be troubled? Did he deserve such treatment as this? Why, he had wept for the man "whose day was hard," and his soul was "grieved for the needy" (v.25). It is sad that Job was virtually claiming to have been more considerate than God was! Why did he allow such words to fall from his lips?
Job no longer aims his complaint at his friends. He traces every blow back to God, and there he stops. He could have spoken to his own soul as the psalmist did:
All this Job ascribes to God. Do we hear him taking counsel with his soul in this time of suffering? — "Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you in turmoil within me? Hope in God; for I shall again praise Him, my salvation and my God" (Ps. 42:11). No; instead of encouraging himself this way, he accuses his Maker.
Job's assumption is that no answer means no hearing. Commentators press against that assumption:
He cries to God but is not heard (v.20). Of course God heard him, but God answers only at the right time and in the right way. Had God become cruel to him? He thought so, but it was the love of God that delayed an answer. What he considered God's hand strong against him was really the strength of God's love for him.
An answer at that moment would have left the deeper problem untouched. Job's problem was not a lack of information. It was something in himself:
He bemoans his terrible state. Up to now he could not hold back the words: he thought God dealt harshly with him, and was arbitrary. He could not understand His ways at all. He did not take in the motive God had — the gracious purpose. In short, he had not reached the end of the Lord, because he had not done with himself. That is the real secret of it.
Behind the ruin was a tenderness Job could not yet see:
He little knew the tenderness of the heart that was leading him to sound the depths of his own mind. He was to learn himself — how small he was, how narrow his outlook, how poor his ideas of God... In short, deep sorrow was to teach him that without realising it he had been making JOB the centre for himself. It was to teach him that the worst immorality is to judge God by what Job thought He ought to be and do.
- Obscure — commentators differ. Either no prayer avails once God's hand falls, or a falling man reaches out and cries for help. The second fits the next verse, where Job recalls his own pity for others.
- Ruins — Job feels he is rubble already, and asks why the blows keep coming. Behind the question lies a sad claim: that he was kinder to sufferers than God was to him.
- Accusation — he traces every blow to God and stops there. He could have taken counsel with his soul and hoped in God instead.
- Delay — God did hear the cry. The silence was not coldness. The hand that felt strong against him was the strength of His love, waiting for the right time.
- Purpose — Job had not reached the end of the Lord because he had not finished with himself. The sorrow that looked arbitrary was tenderness teaching him not to measure God by his own ideas.
Did not I weep for him whose days were hard? was not my soul grieved for the needy?
Job is in ruin, and men have brought lying charges against him. He reaches back for the one thing they cannot take away: a life spent weeping over other people's troubles. But does that record prove anything? And what does a man do when his kindness buys him nothing?
The verse is a question, and it comes at the end of a passage that translators read in different ways. One writer sets out the reading he thinks fits:
Delitzsch renders it as though Job is explaining his cries. Is it not natural for one to reach out his hand for help? So he translates it: does a man not stretch out his hand as he falls, and cry for help in his ruin? This suits what follows: he is only asking what he had shown to others in their time of stress — he has wept for those in trouble and grieved for the needy.
Job is not just remembering. He puts two things side by side. First, his pity for the small griefs of others. Second, the silence from heaven over his own huge grief.
Last of all, Job contrasts his own misery with his tenderness towards the far smaller troubles of the people around him. His own misery gets no hearing and no relief from above. When he cried now, worse followed.
Follow that comparison to its end, and something ugly shows up. It is not in Job's deeds. It is in what his words imply.
Why should his trouble go on? Did he deserve such treatment as this? Why, he had wept for him "whose day was hard", and his soul had been "grieved for the needy" (v.25). It is sad that Job was in effect claiming to have been more considerate than God was! Why did he allow such words to fall from his lips?
Everything Job says here is true. He was the man he describes. And it does him no good at all.
Now, just read chapters 29-31, and you will say, if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man. There is not a man in all your town who can say as much as Job said, and say it truly. As to his kindness to the poor, he was the very opposite of the lying charges brought against him. So he lets memory recount every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I, I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use... Now, if Job could not be just before God, how can you?
There is a question Job never asks: where did his pity come from? One writer answers it, and shows why God dealt with him as He did.
Now Job needed this, and God saw that he needed it. He was gracious and devout, but he did not know himself. He had never seen God in a way that brought him to a real knowledge of himself in His presence. So God deals with him in a way that brings all his sinfulness out, and then places him in His own presence with that sinfulness plain to his conscience... Job had acted well, for grace had acted in him; but he did not know himself before God.
Job had wept for others. What he lacked was something no one in his day could give him.
Jacob, Joshua and Jeremiah never knew the revelation of divine sympathy made in Capernaum and Nain and Bethany. Job was devoted and patient, but he had no one to share his great sorrow. His eye poured out tears to God and his face was red with weeping.
Those names are places where Jesus met human grief. One writer stops at what happened in Bethany:
"Jesus wept"! Wonderful, meaningful fact! He wept not for Himself, but for others. He wept with them... But that Jesus should weep reveals a mystery we cannot fathom. It was divine compassion weeping through human eyes over the ruin that sin had caused in this poor world. It was compassion weeping in sympathy with those whose hearts the relentless hand of death had crushed.
- Tears given. Job's claim is honest. He had wept over hard days and grieved over the needy, and no accusation could touch that record.
- Tears counted. He then turns that record into an argument. He weighs his pity for small sorrows against heaven's silence over his own.
- Tears overreached. Job's argument implies he was kinder than God. That is where a true record turns into a wrong claim.
- Tears sourced. His kindness was real, but grace in him produced it. The trial exposed a man who knew his own goodness better than he knew himself before God.
- Tears answered. Job wept for others and found no one to weep with him. At Bethany that missing sympathy appeared — divine compassion weeping through human eyes.
For I expected good, and there came evil; and I waited for light, but there came darkness.
Job's last long speech looks back at the honour he once had, then at the ruin he now sits in. Verse 26 is the sting in that contrast, and it raises two questions: why did a life of kindness end like this, and has Job read God rightly?
This is not a stray complaint. It is Job's summing up of everything he has just described.
He sums up his misery in verses 26 and 27. In his prosperity he had looked forward to good all his days. Instead, misery had overtaken him, and darkness came where he had hoped for light. Instead of a heart at rest, his inner man was a seething cauldron of anguish — "Days of affliction come to meet me."
Job feels wronged, and he says why. He had wept for others in trouble, so he expected the same care in return.
Why should his trouble go on? Did he deserve such treatment as this? Why, he had wept for the one whose day was hard, and his soul had been grieved for the needy. It is sad that Job was in effect claiming to have been more considerate than God! Why did he allow such words to fall from his lips?
Job expected good because he thought he had been good. That is the one ground on which light never comes.
He looked for good as a result of his apparent goodness, but evil came to him, and darkness came rather than light. But we can never enjoy the light of God's presence when we maintain our own self-righteousness. No wonder then his heart was in turmoil, unable to rest.
There is a deeper reason for the gloom. What Job misses most is not God, but the good days God once gave him.
It is an expression of the deepest gloom. The cause is the bright past he had enjoyed by God's favour, which had too much taken the place of God Himself before his soul… All this is only self, not God. We must humble ourselves under His mighty hand if we want to be lifted up in due time. Self-defence never wins the blessing, however true it may be. Neither does complaining or wounded feeling. The blessing comes by justifying God and learning his own vileness in His presence.
Job draws two conclusions in the dark. God is not listening, he says, and death is all that remains. He is wrong on both counts.
"I cry to you for help and you do not answer me." But God did hear him. There was a reason why He did not answer; but God did hear… "For I know that you will bring me to death" — there he was wrong again. God had good things in store for Job.
The good Job waited for was not cancelled. It came late, and the suffering in between was doing its own work.
Job did not feel happy when the testing pushed him almost beyond what he could endure. He was happy in another sense. He was in the Lord's care, and the Lord was leading him to a sure and certain goal of blessing. For now his affliction was not joyful but painful. Yet it was about to yield him the peaceable fruit of righteousness, because it was training him… We find "the end of the Lord" in the last chapters of Job's history, where we get to see him restored to blessing and to the favour of the Lord.
- Expectation. Job looked forward to good all his days. He got misery instead, and his inner man became a cauldron of anguish.
- Ground. He expected good because he thought he had been good. He had wept for others in trouble, so he was in effect claiming to be kinder than God.
- Blockage. No one enjoys the light of God's presence while holding on to his own righteousness. Self-defence never wins the blessing, however true it is.
- Misreading. God did hear the cry He did not answer, and Job was wrong to think death was the end — God had good things in store for him.
- Outcome. The last chapters show the end of the Lord. Job is restored to blessing and favour. The good was not cancelled, only delayed while the affliction bore its peaceable fruit.
My bowels well up, and rest not; days of affliction have confronted me.
Job has been describing what his life has become. Now he turns inward — to a grief that will not settle, and to the question of why his days bring nothing but affliction.
The picture is of an inward life that has come apart. One writer traces the turmoil through the daylight hours and into the night, where most sufferers get at least a pause:
So he was completely unnerved, and his soul seemed to dissolve in sorrow, as days of suffering held him fast. Night usually brings even the most wretched some relief, but for Job it made the misery worse. It pierced his bones, as if they were being picked out of him. And the disease gnawing his flesh began its work early, and it never slept.
The turmoil follows a disappointment. One writer links Job's darkness to the self-righteousness he was holding on to:
He looked for good as a result of his apparent goodness, but evil came to him (v.26), and darkness came instead of light. But we can never enjoy the light of God's presence when we maintain our own self-righteousness. No wonder then his heart was in turmoil, unable to rest (v.27), and he had no expectation of anything but "days of affliction."
There is a way to speak to your own soul in such a state, and Job does not take it. He describes his condition accurately and then lays it at God's door:
His soul is poured out, and days of suffering are his portion. The nights are no better. The gnawing disease does not sleep, and it lays his bones bare out of his very flesh… All this Job ascribes to God… Do we hear him taking counsel with his soul in this time of suffering? — "Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you in turmoil within me? Hope in God; for I shall again praise him, my salvation and my God" (Ps. 42:11). No; instead of encouraging himself like this, he accuses his Maker.
One writer traces the depth of the gloom back to the brightness of what came before:
It is an expression of the deepest gloom. The cause is the bright past he had enjoyed by God's favour, which had taken too much of the place of God Himself before his soul… For all this is self, not God. We must humble ourselves under His mighty hand if we want to be lifted up in due time. Self-defence never wins the blessing, however true it is, and neither does complaining or wounded feeling. What wins it is justifying God and learning his own vileness in His presence.
This danger did not end with Job. Another writer names who is behind it:
Satan is always trying to occupy me with myself. That never leads to a true judgment of myself. Moaning over my inconsistencies may look to some like piety and humility… But Satan can get a good man occupied with himself. Job is an example of this, and he expresses it through twenty chapters; but God had to empty him of all that.
Nothing here tells Job why this is happening. The reason had to do with Job himself:
Poor Job. He little knew the tenderness of the heart that was leading him to sound the depths of his own mind. He was to learn himself in his own insignificance, in the smallness of his outlook, in the poverty of his ideas of God.
Job would see that love, but only later:
Oh, if Job had only known the tender love that would have spared him all this suffering, except that it was for his own good! He does not know that "the Lord is compassionate and merciful." That will come when he sees "the end of the Lord" — the purpose that is in view (James 5:11).
- Turmoil — Job's soul "seemed to dissolve in sorrow." The day brings no break, and the night brings none either.
- Cause — Job expected his good life to earn him good days. Holding on to that self-righteousness shuts out the light of God's presence.
- Self — the gloom runs deep because the bright past had crowded out God Himself. All of it is "self, not God," and self-defence never wins the blessing.
- Warning — being taken up with yourself can pass for humility. It never gives a true judgment of yourself, and God had to empty Job of it.
- End — behind the affliction was a tenderness Job could not see, teaching him about himself. That love shows at "the end of the Lord," not in the middle of the pain.
I go about blackened, but not by the sun; I stand up, I cry in the congregation.
Job is at the end of his long defence. He has described a body wrecked by disease and a life stripped of every comfort. Here he puts that ruin into two pictures: a man walking about blackened, and a man on his feet in public, crying out. Both raise the questions the whole book turns on: what had darkened him, and who was he crying to?
One commentator's own translation of the lines around the verse sets Job's blackened walk beside the rest of his loss:
When I looked for good, evil came, and when I waited for light, darkness came. My insides boil and are not silent; days of affliction have overtaken me. I am going about blackened without the sun; I stand up in the assembly, I cry out. I have become a brother of jackals, and a companion of ostriches.
So "not by the sun" rules out the ordinary causes. Nothing outside him had done this:
What could go beyond what he felt inside, or beyond what it did to his body? And this came from no natural or outside cause. It came from blows never heard of before, from wasting disease, and from struggles of soul worse than all of it.
The second half of the verse puts Job on his feet in public. Grief borne alone and grief poured out in front of people are not the same thing:
Two things upset Job's mind, or perhaps the two together. One was the sympathy of his friends. Alone, and from God in His presence, we can bear what we cannot bear once we have the chance to make our complaint before man. The other was pride. Pride is not stirred while we are alone, but it is wounded when others watch our misery.
So his cry was not aimed at God alone. He was calling out to the people around him, and the sound he made was no longer a human one:
He had even cried out among men, and not to God only, and this so mournfully as to set him with the animals and birds known for their yells and screeches.
Job expected his record to buy him a different outcome. One writer traces his darkness back to that expectation:
He looked for good as a result of his apparent goodness, but evil came to him (v.26), and darkness came rather than light. But we can never enjoy the light of God's presence when we maintain our own self-righteousness. No wonder then his heart was in turmoil, unable to rest (v.27), and he had no expectation of anything but "days of affliction."
Job read God's silence as hostility. He had it backwards:
He brings in God again. You do not answer me! Heaven had been silent to all his pleas. What a dreadful charge: "You have turned cruel to me; with the might of Your hand You persecute me"! He thinks himself completely forsaken, not knowing that God's thoughts toward him were thoughts of love and peace.
Job's speech ends in sorrow with no faith in it. Another voice spoke out of a deeper darkness:
So the wail ends in a song of sadness, without a note of faith. Let us thank our God that Another has lifted His voice out of deeper darkness than all that pressed upon Job. His words were words of sweet assurance: "Shall I not drink the cup that the Father has given me?" "Father, into your hands I commit my spirit!" (John 18:11; Luke 23:46). To Him — our Saviour, our Lord, our all — we turn, and learn in our grief to say, "Your will be done."
The riddle is not solved by anything Job says in this chapter, and the reason is that the chapter is still about Job:
No solution of the riddle appears yet. On the contrary, the difficulty grows. God is hidden even more, the longer Job dwells on the circumstances of the past and the present, with a conscience on which no evil lay. For all this is but self, not God; and we must humble ourselves under His mighty hand if we want to be lifted up at the right time. Self-defence does not win the blessing, however true it is. Neither does complaining or wounded feeling. The blessing comes by justifying God and learning one's own vileness in His presence.
- Blackened — his darkness came from no sun. It came from crushing blows, wasting disease, and inward pain worse than both.
- Self — he looked for good because he had done good. No one enjoys the light of God's presence while holding on to self-righteousness.
- Audience — he stood up and cried out in public. What we can bear alone with God we often cannot bear once people are watching.
- Silence — he called God's silence cruelty. God's thoughts toward him were thoughts of love and peace.
- Contrast — Job's lament ends with no note of faith. So we listen to the One who, in deeper darkness, said, "Your will be done."
I am become a brother to jackals, and a companion of ostriches.
Job has just finished remembering his days of honour, and now he places himself among the animals of the wasteland — no longer among men. The picture raises two questions. What do these creatures stand for? And was Job right about his own case?
"Brother" here is not about family. Scripture stretches the word well past blood relation, and Job's line is listed among the examples:
Besides the ordinary use of the word in its literal sense, it is applied to cousins and nephews, Genesis 14:14; Leviticus 10:4; and to kinsmen generally, Exodus 2:11; 2 Kings 10:13; 2 Chronicles 22:8. It is also used where there is a moral likeness. Job 30:29; Proverbs 18:9.
The second creature is harder to pin down. Older translations put "owl" where newer ones have "ostrich". The Hebrew name behind it is built on a word for howling:
A related Hebrew word takes bath in front of it, which marks the female. That gives bath yaanah, "daughter of howling." Translations render it "owl" eight times, in places such as Leviticus 11:16; Job 30:29; Isaiah 34:13; Micah 1:8. It counts as one of the unclean birds. It lives in waste places and has a wailing cry, and both fit the habits of the ostrich well.
Job shares their ground and their cry. His complaint is not only about pain; it is about company. He is left with creatures that keep away from people, and he has cause to hide even from them:
At last we reach the end of the wail — the last of those laments that pierce the heart. He pictures himself as a lonely wanderer in the dark, a companion of beasts and birds that avoid the face of man. He might well hide from them, for his skin drops off his rotting flesh; his very bones are parched and dry.
The same lament runs on past this line. His music went the way of his company:
I have become a brother to jackals, and a companion of ostriches. … My harp is turned to wailing, and my pipe to the voice of weepers.
Job's description of his body was accurate. His conclusion about God was not:
He brings in God again. You do not answer me! Heaven had been silent to all his pleas. What a dreadful charge: "You have turned cruel to me; with the might of Your hand You persecute me"! He thinks himself completely forsaken. He does not know that God's thoughts towards him were thoughts of love and peace. His skin is black, he says, his bones are burned with heat. No joy for him, nothing but weeping.
Job's charge was false, but blame is not what the writers call for. One sets his condition beside the limit God had fixed for it:
God had given Satan permission to do his worst, short of taking his life. With cruel skill Satan reduced his body to such a state of loathsome disease as, we suppose, no man has suffered before or since. In any other case the victim would have died before so much bodily trouble could develop. Let us not judge Job harshly. In such a fearful plight as his we should probably have said far worse things than he.
Job has no answer for his own darkness. Writers point instead to Another who spoke out of a deeper one:
So the wail ends in a song of sadness, without a note of faith. Oh, let us thank our God that Another has lifted His voice out of deeper darkness than all that pressed upon Job. His words were words of sweet assurance: "Shall I not drink the cup that the Father has given me?" "Father, into your hands I commit my spirit!" (John 18:11; Luke 23:46). To Him — our Saviour, our Lord, our all — we turn, and learn in our grief to say, "Your will be done."
Job's isolation was not the end of his story. What he lost came back to him, people included:
Then "the Lord gave Job twice as much as he had before." … God gave a mighty increase to the animals he had, but there was also what came to him by the gifts of his brothers and acquaintances. He won back the confidence and esteem of everyone who had known him before. That is a great point, when we remember his sad complaint in Job 30 about the way people treated him.
- Kinship — "Brother" here means likeness, not bloodline. Job names the howling creatures of the waste as his own kind.
- Company — His new companions keep away from people. He lost more than his health; he lost every human tie.
- Verdict — His account of his body was true. His account of God was false. He thought himself forsaken, while God's thoughts towards him were love and peace.
- Restraint — God let Satan do his worst, but stopped him short of death. In the same plight we would likely have said worse.
- Reversal — Job's lament ends without faith. Christ spoke assurance out of deeper darkness, and Job's own end brought double blessing and restored esteem.
My skin is become black [and falleth] off me, and my bones are parched with heat.
Job's last long speech closes on his body. He has described the mockery of men and the silence of heaven. Now he points to his own skin and bones as the proof.
One commentator treats these closing lines as the last of Job's laments.
At last we reach the end of the wail — the last of those laments which pierce the heart. ... His skin drops off his rotting flesh; his very bones are parched and dry. Surely misery like this would move even the hardest heart. Must these friends not listen to such grief, and have pity?
The disease was not the whole of it. One writer weighs what Job felt inside against what showed on his body.
Yet what could exceed his inward feeling? What could exceed its effect on his body? And this came from no natural or outward cause. It came from unheard-of blows, from a consuming disease, and from struggles of soul worse than all.
Scripture uses "black" for more than skin. One writer follows the word from Job into the Song of Solomon.
The term "black" is generally used in scripture to express affliction, sorrow, and persecution. "My skin," as Job says, "turns black and falls from me, and my bones burn with heat." (Job 30:30) It is especially so with disobedient Israel. But here, the confession is sweetly joined with faith in Christ, and so becomes, morally, the truthful expression of all believers. "I am very dark, but lovely." Black as sin in myself — whiter than snow in Christ.
Job had concluded that God had turned cruel to him. One commentator answers that charge.
What seems the most devastating misery for Job is that he considers God is against him. He cries to God but is not heard (v.20). Of course God heard him, but God answers only at the right time and in the right way. Had God become cruel to him? He thought so, but it was the love of God that delayed an answer. What he considered God's hand strong against him was really the strength of God's love for him.
Job was right about one thing: the hand behind it all was God's.
It is good that he recognises one thing. Whatever his suffering, and whatever its source, God is the One who has allowed it. But Job ought to have realised that God would not allow it if it was not going to be of pure blessing to Job in the end.
One commentator explains why the darkness holds to the last line.
This is an expression of the deepest gloom. The cause is the bright past he had enjoyed by God's favour, which had taken too much of the place of God Himself before his soul... No solution of the riddle appears yet. Instead the difficulty thickens. God is hidden still more, the more Job dwells on the circumstances of past and present, with a conscience on which no evil lay. For all this is but self, not God; and we must humble ourselves under His mighty hand, if we would be exalted in due time.
Before we criticise the lament, one writer asks us to picture the condition that produced it.
In the closing verses of this chapter he described how far his body had fallen into weakness, misery and decay. God had given Satan permission to do his worst, short of taking his life. With cruel skill Satan reduced his body to such loathsome disease as, we suppose, no man has suffered before or since. Let us not judge Job harshly. In such a fearful plight as his we should probably have said far worse things than he.
One commentator sets beside Job's ending a voice out of deeper darkness.
So the wail ends in a song of sadness, without a note of faith. Oh, let us thank our God that Another has lifted His voice out of darkness deeper than all that pressed upon Job. His words carry sweet assurance: "Shall I not drink the cup that the Father has given Me?" "Father, into Your hands I commit My spirit" (John 18:11; Luke 23:46). To Him — our Saviour, our Lord, our all — we turn, and learn in our grief to say, "Your will be done."
- Blackened. The verse reads like Job's own medical report: skin falling from rotting flesh, bones parched and dry. His soul was in worse shape than his body.
- Misread. He took the strong hand on him as cruelty; it was the strength of God's love, delaying its answer until the right time.
- Permitted. God let Satan do his worst, short of taking Job's life. The blow was fierce, but it had a limit.
- Self. The gloom never lifts here because Job is still occupied with Job — his bright past, his ruined present. That is self, not God.
- Sung. His harp ends in mourning with no note of faith; the answer is not in Job's song but in Another's, who drank a deeper cup and still said, "Father, into Your hands I commit My spirit."
My harp also is [turned] to mourning, and my pipe into the voice of weepers.
Job's final speech ends with this line. The instruments that once led celebration now carry only grief, and there the lament stops.
One commentator traces the whole lament down to this last note.
At last we reach the end of the wail — the last of those laments that pierce the heart. He pictures himself as a lonely wanderer in the dark, a companion of beasts and birds that avoid the face of man. … Job has sounded all the depths of his suffering and grief. His harp has no notes but the sad wail of mourning. His pipe leads no dance; it is turned only to notes of sorrow.
The "pipe" in this verse names a real instrument. A Bible dictionary describes its shape and where else it turns up in the Bible.
uggab, ugab. A wind musical instrument, of either one or several pipes. The Egyptian monuments show a double pipe, with holes like a flute. Several pipes of different lengths were also joined together. Gen. 4:21; Job 21:12; Job 30:31; Ps. 150:4. The syrinx, or Pan's pipe, is still used in Syria, and sometimes has as many as twenty-three pipes.
Job's own music turns to mourning, but other people are still singing about him. One commentator describes the crowd doing it.
And now Job had become their song and their byword. These were wretched cave-dwellers, if not worse by birth. Even they dared to turn him into a joke and spiteful abuse. In their disgust they would keep far away. If they did come near, it was to pour on him the lowest mark of shameful contempt. But Job could see God's hand behind all the humiliation he suffered.
Commentators differ on how much blame lies with Job. One finds a reason why the light never came.
He looked for good as a result of his apparent goodness, but evil came to him (v.26), and darkness came rather than light. But we can never enjoy the light of God's presence when we maintain our own self-righteousness. No wonder then his heart was in turmoil, unable to rest (v.27). … He felt he had sunk as low as the animals, jackals and ostriches (v.29), but he was still speaking as a man! What music he had enjoyed was now turned into mourning and weeping.
Another writer looks at the state Job's body was in and draws a gentler lesson.
In the closing verses of this chapter he described the extreme weakness, misery and decay his body had come to. … Let us not judge Job harshly. In such a fearful plight as his we should probably have said far worse things than he.
A few verses earlier Job said God did not hear him and had turned cruel. One commentator answers those words line by line, quoting an older translation of them.
"I cry to You and You do not hear me." But God did hear him. There was a reason why He did not answer; but God did hear. "I stand up, and You do not regard me. You have become cruel to me." There he was quite wrong… "For I know that You will bring me to death" — there he was wrong again. God had good things in store for Job.
The chapter ends with no upward look. One writer turns from Job's darkness to Another who suffered more.
So the wail ends in a song of sadness, without a note of faith. Oh, let us thank our God that Another has lifted His voice out of deeper darkness than all that pressed upon Job. He spoke words of sweet assurance: "Shall I not drink the cup that the Father has given Me?" "Father, into Your hands I commit My spirit" (John 18:11; Luke 23:46). To Him — our Saviour, our Lord, our all — we turn, and learn in our grief to say, "Your will be done."
- The note. Job's harp keeps only one sound, and his pipe leads no dance — his music is reduced to the noise of mourners.
- The instrument. The "pipe" is the uggab, a wind instrument of one or several pipes, the same word used in Genesis 4:21 and Psalm 150:4.
- The mockery. The lowest men in the land made him their song, while his own instruments could only weep.
- The cause, disputed. One commentator blames Job's self-righteousness for keeping God's light away. Another asks us not to judge a man in that state.
- The answer. God did hear Job, and He had good things in store. In deeper darkness, Christ could still say, "Father, into Your hands I commit My spirit."
I made a covenant with mine eyes; and how should I fix my regard upon a maid?
Job's last long speech ends with a solemn oath, and he begins it with his eyes. Why would a man defending his whole life start with a look? And was a vow of purity enough to stand before God?
His friends assumed that some hidden sin had brought this ruin on him. This closing speech is his answer.
Here, at the close of his last speech, Job makes the most solemn and complete declaration of his innocence. He is not denying what he had already admitted about man's condition, his own included. But he flatly rejects the thought of grievous wickedness hidden under a fair exterior, which God might now be waging war against, as his friends had supposed.
Purity was the one charge his friends had never raised. Job puts it first.
Job opens this sevenfold declaration of purity and integrity. He dwells on a side of his character and conduct that even his friends had not openly challenged.
A covenant is a binding agreement, and Job makes one with his own eyes. He settled the matter before temptation ever arrived.
He says he had made a covenant with his eyes. That is, he had decided that what his eyes saw would not seduce him. He would clearly look away from anything that might be tempting. For he recognised that God above knew every thought of his heart.
The eye works like a gate into the heart. Guard it, and the fight is over before it starts.
Set a strong guard over your outward senses. These are Satan's landing-places, above all the eye and the ear. Watch what you let in through them. Empty talk seldom passes without leaving some stain on the heart. And as for your eye, do not let it wander; unclean sights cause unclean thoughts. Job knew his eye and his thoughts were likely to go together, and so to secure the one he made a covenant with the other.
Job does not only claim clean conduct. He claims a guarded heart, and he names what kept it that way.
He approaches it with the boldness of conscious innocence. His eyes are the doorway to the heart, and he had closed them by settled purpose — a "covenant" against even a look at what might stir up passion. In the Sermon on the Mount, our Lord had shown that real purity must lie in the heart. It is not just a matter of avoiding outward acts (Matt. 5:27-28). As he declares his purity, Job points out that the fear of God moved him, for God would repay sin upon the wicked.
One king failed exactly where Job held firm.
The flesh is the same today as it ever was; it does not change. We are told "to make no provision for the flesh" (Rom. 13:14). Paraphrased this means: do not feed the flesh by indulging it; flee fleshly, youthful lusts. And now the climax is reached. "I have made a covenant with my eyes; how then could I gaze at a virgin?" — so said Job. David knew no such covenant. He looks where he should not have looked, and sin soon follows.
What about a thought you never invited? Commentators draw a line between the thought that arrives and the thought a person keeps.
No Christian can stop unclean thoughts from rising in his mind. They only become sin when he refuses to turn away and gives himself to them on purpose.
There are also over-sensitive and over-anxious Christians whose consciences are heavily burdened by involuntary looks and thoughts. I would like to remind such people of the well-known words of Martin Luther, which he wrote on this verse: "I cannot prevent a bird flying over my head, but what I can prevent is it building a nest in my hair or biting off my nose."
Job's record here is genuine. Two commentators still point to what it cannot do.
He had a perfectly good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the great principle of complete submission to God and of vindicating Him — that He is right and wise in everything, not only in what He does, but in what He allows.
There is no reason to doubt what Job says of himself. Yet he did not realise that the very act of declaring his own goodness was sinful pride.
- Covenant. Job's purity rested on a decision made before the temptation arrived, not on willpower during it.
- Gate. Eye and thought travel together. Shut the gate, and the heart never has to fight.
- Heart. The standard reaches past the act to the look and the motive — the same ground the Sermon on the Mount covers.
- Contrast. David had no such covenant; he looked, and sin followed. The flesh has not changed since.
- Limit. A clear conscience was not enough. Job's record still needed self-judgment and submission to God, not display.
For what would have been [my] portion of +God from above, and what the heritage of the Almighty from on high?
Job has just made a promise about what his eyes will look at. This verse gives his reason. He asks what God above would hand down to a man who lives by other rules — and the question shows both the strength and the weakness of Job's whole defence.
Job guarded his eyes because of what he believed about God. One writer links the promise of verse 1 to the reason given in verse 2:
He says he had made a covenant with his eyes (v.1). That is, he had decided he would not be seduced by what his eyes observed. He would clearly look away from anything that might be tempting. For he recognised that God above knew every thought of his heart, for the Almighty was high above Job (v.2). So destruction was not meant for Job, but for the workers of iniquity (v.3). Job knew that God watched his ways and the details of every step (v.4).
The verse uses two names for God. A closer rendering keeps the Hebrew words behind "God" and "the Almighty":
And what would be the portion of Eloah from above, and inheritance of Shaddai from on high?
Job asks because the answer is obvious. One writer gives it, then adds what a clean record still lacks:
None at all for a corrupt man who takes advantage of another… He had a perfectly good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the grand principle of full submission to God, and of vindicating Him — He is right and wise in everything, not only in what He does, but in what He allows. It is all for good.
Job shut the door at the eye. One writer connects this with other Scripture, and with two men who faced the same test:
His eyes, the avenue to the heart, had been closed by full purpose — a "covenant," against even a look at what might stir up passion. Our Lord in the "sermon on the mount" had shown that real purity must be in the heart, not only in outward self-control (Matt. 5:27-28). Claiming his purity, Job points out that the fear of God moved him, and that God would repay sin on the wicked. "How then can I do this great wickedness and sin against God?" said Joseph when the woman pressed him to sin (Gen. 39:9). In an hour of spiritual sloth, David had allowed his eyes to wander, and had fallen (2 Sam. 11:2).
Job really was upright. The problem is what he did with that fact:
Job was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That proves he had never really been in the presence of God… In Job 29 we also find that his heart had dwelt on his upright and kind life with satisfaction. He commended himself, and fed his self-love with it. "When the eye saw me it gave witness to me." God was bringing him to say, "Now my eye sees You and I abhor myself."
Another writer names what that mistake costs:
Job's thoughts are mixed: he is not exactly meeting God as a sinner, but as one who is conscious of "the root of the matter" in his heart. His mistake is to confuse this with his own personal worthiness, and so spoil the very thought of grace. Who of all the sons of men could stand before a thrice holy God, and say "I am clean?" "In Your sight shall no man living be justified."
- Above. Job guarded his eyes because God is above him. He knows every thought of the heart, not just behaviour.
- Portion. The verse asks what God hands down from on high. For a corrupt man who takes advantage of another, the answer is nothing at all.
- Entrance. Job shut the door at the eye, "the avenue to the heart." Real purity lies in the heart, not only in outward restraint.
- Conscience. A perfectly good conscience is not enough. Self-judgment is still needed, and full submission to God — even to what He allows.
- Grace. Job's uprightness was real, but he made it his righteousness. He mixed it up with his own worthiness, and that spoils the very thought of grace. God brought him to say, "Now my eye sees You and I abhor myself."
Is not calamity for the unrighteous? and misfortune for the workers of iniquity?
Job's final speech is an oath. This verse gives his reason for keeping his eyes and his steps clean: ruin waits for the wicked. Job expects everyone listening to agree — yet the man asking is the one sitting in ruin.
This line belongs to the closing section of Job's long defence, where he denies the sins his friends suspected in him.
Here, at the close of his last speech, Job makes the most solemn and complete declaration of his innocence. He does not deny what he had already admitted about man's condition, his own included. But he flatly rejects the thought of serious wickedness hidden under a fair exterior, which God could now be at war with, as his friends had supposed. He points to his personal purity, again as a married man. He points to how he treated his servants, how he remembered the poor and the exposed, how he hated idolatry and greed, how he lived in generous and hospitable ways, and how he hated hypocrisy. He prays that, if he is lying, God may put him to utter shame.
Job made a covenant with his own eyes. This verse gives the motive behind it.
By settled purpose he had shut his eyes — the door to the heart — with a "covenant" against even a look at what might stir up passion. In the Sermon on the Mount, our Lord had shown that real purity must lie in the heart, not just in outward restraint (Matthew 5:27-28). As Job asserts his purity, he points out that the fear of God moved him, for God would surely repay sin on the wicked. "How can I do this great wickedness and sin against God?" said Joseph when the temptress came at him (Gen. 39:9). In an hour of spiritual sloth, David had let his eyes wander, and had fallen (2 Sam. 11:2).
The verse before this asks what share a man has from God above. Here comes the answer: the man who takes advantage of another gets nothing from heaven, only ruin. Yet a clear record still leaves something missing.
"I made a covenant with my eyes; why then should I think about a young woman? For what portion of God is there from above, and what inheritance of the Almighty from on high?" None whatever for a corrupt man, who takes advantage of another. "Is not calamity for the unrighteous, and disaster for the workers of iniquity? Does He not see my ways" — he was a truly devout, believing man — "and count all my steps?" … He had a completely clear conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. And there is the great principle of full submission to God, vindicating Him. He is right and wise in everything, not only in what He does, but in what He allows.
Behind Job's question stands a truth many people would rather not hear: God repays evil.
Now, God declares in Deuteronomy 7:10 that "He will not be slack to him that hates Him; He will repay him to his face." This truth is most solemn, and we ought to press it more on everyone it concerns. Men do not like to hear it. Many pretend and profess not to believe it. They would love to persuade themselves and others that God is too good, too kind, too merciful, too warm-hearted to judge His creatures sternly. They forget that God's ways in government are as perfect as His ways in grace.
Job's uprightness was real. But he was turning it into a case for himself.
Job was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That proves he had never really been in the presence of God… We also find in Job 29 that his heart had dwelt on his upright and kind way of life with satisfaction. He commended himself and fed his self-love with it. God was bringing him to say, "Now my eye sees You and I abhor myself." Job ends his speech with these chapters (Job 29, 30, 31), which express his good opinion of himself. He had told out his whole heart.
- Covenant. Job shut his eyes by deliberate purpose, because he knew sin's real seat is the heart, not just the conduct.
- Fear. This verse gives the motive: he believed God repays wickedness, so he settled the matter before temptation came.
- Portion. The corrupt man has no share from God above. Ruin is all that is coming to him. God's ways in government are as perfect as His ways in grace.
- Conscience. Job's conscience was clear. Kelly says that is not enough.
- Presence. What was missing was self-judgment before God. There a man stops admiring himself and says, "Now my eye sees You."
Doth not he see my ways, and number all my steps?
Job has reached the last of his long speeches, and he swears he is innocent — starting with a covenant not to let his eyes wander. Verse 4 gives his reason: God watches him and counts every step, though a clean record before people is not the same as being right with God.
Job appeals to God, who sees what no human witness could. One commentator calls him a devout believer with a clear conscience, then shows why that was still not enough.
"Does not He see my ways" — he was a thoroughly pious believing man — "and number all my steps?… Let me be weighed in an even balance, that God may know my integrity." He had a perfectly good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the grand principle of full submission to God, and of vindicating Him. He is right and wise in all — not only in what He does, but in what He allows.
This verse comes right after Job's covenant with his eyes, and it explains that covenant. Because God saw every step, Job guarded his heart and not just his outward conduct. Jesus taught the same standard in the Sermon on the Mount.
He had closed his eyes, the pathway to the heart, by a firm decision — a "covenant" against even a look at what might stir up passion. The Lord Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount had shown that real purity must lie in the heart, and not only in outward self-control (Matt. 5:27-28). Job insists he is pure, and points out that the fear of God moved him — God would certainly punish the wicked for their sin… Job knew that God watched his every step, and he asks God to test him and weigh him in the balance.
Job was right about the charges. Others had called him a hypocrite, and he was not one. But one writer marks the limit of that defence.
This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, was concerned with his outward conduct, for as yet the searching light of God had not entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not this, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not, but outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness in the presence of God.
Inviting God's inspection is right. Turning your own record into your standing before Him is not. One writer shows how Job's closing chapters expose that.
Job was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That plainly proves he had never really been in the presence of God… In Job 29 we also find that his heart had dwelt on his upright and generous life with satisfaction. He was commending himself and feeding his self-love with it. "When the eye saw me it gave witness to me." God was bringing him to say, "Now my eye sees You and I abhor myself." Job ends his speech with these chapters (Job 29, 30, 31), which express his good opinion of himself. He had told his whole heart out.
Another writer puts the same failure more simply, without denying Job's sincerity:
But we must take note of the self-righteousness which moved Job to speak of himself in this way. He was displaying himself rather than giving glory to God. No doubt at bottom he was a man of genuine piety, but it is no glory to set forth one's own glory.
Job's question states a fact, and that fact holds for every person. What changes is whether you live in the awareness of it.
The fact is that God knows all about me at all times. He knows me whether I am asleep or awake, whether I am aware that His eyes are on me or not. But when I grasp the truth that God knows everything, as the psalmist did, I shall want to walk in that awareness all the time… Then, in all I do and say, I shall have the happy assurance that God Himself is before me and all around me, every step of the way.
- Seen. God sees Job's ways and numbers every step. Job takes that as plain fact and builds his whole defence on it.
- Restrained. Because he knew God was watching, Job made a covenant with his eyes. The fear of God guarded his heart, not just his conduct.
- Not enough. Job's conscience was clear, but a clear conscience is not righteousness before God.
- Exposed. Job turned his own uprightness into his righteousness. That showed he had never really stood in God's presence; he was commending himself and feeding his self-love.
- Changed. Welcome the eye that counts every step. God was bringing Job to say, "Now my eye sees You and I abhor myself."
If I have walked with falsehood, and my foot hath hasted to deceit,
Job's last long speech ends with a sworn defence of his life. Here he denies two things: living by falsehood, and running after deceit. He puts it as a challenge — let God test the claim and see. So one question stands over the verse: can a clean record before men carry a man through God's scales?
By this point Job has stopped reasoning with his friends and started swearing before God. One writer reads the whole chapter as a set of denials, aimed at the charges his friends had laid.
After these sorrowful complaints, Job closed his long speech, as we see in Job 31, with a series of statements that almost amount to oaths. His friends had accused him of definite sins and wrongdoing. As to these things his conscience was clear, though, as we have seen, he admitted he was not pure in the sight of God. So he strongly affirmed that he had not committed the kinds of evil that were alleged or hinted at.
The verse comes straight after Job's vow about his eyes. He puts lying in the same class as unclean desire — and he weighs both by the God who watches him.
He judges unclean desires as well as actions. He does this in the fear of Him who had power to cast soul and body into hell. And all the while, that same God took notice of every step he took. Vanity or falsehood, too, was just as far from Job's spirit and ways as impurity. Men who judged by appearances might think what they liked. Job could still ask God to weigh him in a just balance, to test whether he had used deceit or turned aside from the way.
The verse speaks of walking, and of a foot running. Job has just said that God sees his ways and counts his steps. So he makes his denial to the One who already holds the record.
He says he had made a covenant with his eyes (v.1). That is, he had decided he would not be led astray by what his eyes saw. He recognised that God above knew every thought of his heart, for the Almighty was high above Job (v.2). So destruction was not for Job, but for those who do evil (v.3). Job knew that God watched his ways and counted every detail of his steps (v.4).
Job's denial comes with a demand: put me on honest scales. Anyone who asks for that should know what such a weighing takes in.
If you are standing on that ground before God, take care! He will not let one single sin pass without a just penalty, and you must receive it. If I go before Him to prove my own righteousness, He must weigh me in His scales — He must weigh every thought and imagination of my heart.
Job's conscience really was clear. That still did not settle his case. What he lacked was not innocence but self-judgment.
He had a perfectly good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the grand principle of full submission to God, and of vindicating Him. He is right and wise in everything — not only in what He does, but in what He allows. It is all for good. It may be very bad on the part of others, as it was on the part of Job's friends, but God had a good purpose for Job in it all.
The danger here is subtle. Job's life really was upright. The trouble started when he made that uprightness his standing before God.
Job was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That is plain proof that he had never really been in the presence of God... In Job 29 we also see that his heart had dwelt on his upright and generous life with self-satisfaction. He commended himself, and fed his self-love with it. "When the eye saw me it gave witness to me." God was bringing him to say, "Now my eye sees You and I abhor myself."
Another writer states where each road ends. There is "nothing but wrath for the self-righteous — nothing but grace for the self-judged" (C. H. Mackintosh).
- Sworn. Job's denial of falsehood and deceit belongs to a closing series of statements that almost amount to oaths. It answers the charges his friends made.
- Weighed. He asks God for honest scales. But that weighing takes in every thought and imagination of the heart, not just outward acts.
- Watched. God watches his ways and counts every step. Job hides nothing, because nothing can be hidden.
- Wide. Lying is no lesser fault. Falsehood was as far from Job's spirit as impurity, and God judges desires along with actions.
- Wanting. A good conscience is not enough. Uprightness turned into a claim becomes self-righteousness. The self-righteous meet wrath; the self-judged meet grace — and this man ends up saying, "now my eye sees You and I abhor myself."
(Let me be weighed in an even balance, and +God will take knowledge of my blamelessness;)
Job is still in pain and still accused. Here he answers his friends by putting himself on trial: weigh me, and see. The challenge is bold. It also raises the question the rest of the book will answer: can any man survive God's weighing?
The image comes from the marketplace. Job asks for scales nobody has rigged — older translations call this an "even balance."
A pair of balances or scales: you can see them on the Egyptian monuments, with the weights in one scale and the goods in the other. People also needed them in early days for weighing money... Job asked to be weighed in an even balance, Job 31:6, because men contrived to falsify the balance, as well as the weights, which was an abomination to the Lord.
So Job asks for accuracy, not a favour — no thumb on the scale, no guesswork from his friends.
The verse sits inside a self-examination that runs through the whole chapter. Job does not limit it to what people could see. He includes desires, and his duty toward God.
Job tests himself formally and in detail against a very long list of offences. He does this toward God as well as man, by failure in good as well as by self-gratification or other sins. We may be sure that not one of the friends who in effect put him on trial could have afforded to test himself as Job does here. He judges unclean lusts as well as actions... Men drew their conclusions from appearances. Whatever they thought, he could ask God to weigh him in a just balance.
Job's request is honest, and his conscience is clear. Commentators add that a clear conscience is not enough.
He had a perfectly good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the great principle of complete submission to God, and of vindicating Him — that He is right and wise in all, not only in what He does, but in what He allows.
A man can be sure of himself and still measure by the wrong weights.
It is a very grave error to suppose that, provided a man acts up to the dictates of his conscience, he is all right and safe. Peace resting on such a foundation will be destroyed for ever when the light of the judgement-seat shines in on the conscience. God could never lower His claim to such a level. The balances of the sanctuary work by a very different scale from the one the most sensitive conscience gives.
Job's friends had called him a hypocrite. He was not, and he refused to confess a sin he had not committed. Yet something in him still needed God's light.
In affirming his own integrity and truth, he charged his friends with being the ones who spoke falsehood and deceit. All the while he held fast his righteousness with the utmost resolution. This "righteousness"... was concerned with his outward conduct, for as yet the searching light of God had not entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not this, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not. But outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness before God.
As a description of a life, Job 31 is admirable. The problem was who was delivering it.
There is as fine a description as you could have of an admirable saint, in Job 31. But the trouble is, it was Job talking about himself. It is a fine thing to be eloquent about other people's goodness. But it is not a fine subject for oneself, and that is what betrayed Job.
Job got his hearing. When God answered, it was not Job's record that came to light, but his pride.
He suffered intensely under the hand of the adversary, and through the misunderstanding of men. But his real difficulty was the pride of the flesh — whose actions gave him importance before men. It was something that had never been judged in the presence of God. God's dealings with Job were about this, and how successful those dealings were! The moment came when Job said, "I had heard of you... but now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes"... All pride of self has gone, and God is free to bless him abundantly.
- Weighed fairly. Job asks for honest weights, not mercy. The picture is a balance no trader has rigged, since God hated false scales.
- Weighed thoroughly. He tests himself on desires as well as deeds, toward God as well as men — a test none of his accusers could have survived.
- Weighed by conscience. His conscience was clear, but a clear conscience is not enough. The sanctuary's balances use a different scale from the most sensitive conscience.
- Weighed only outwardly. His record of conduct was true. But outward correctness is not righteousness before God, and the searching light had not yet reached his soul.
- Weighed at last. When God answered, the pride Job had never judged came to light. He despised himself and repented — and then God was free to bless him.
If my step have turned out of the way, and my heart followed mine eyes, and if any blot cleaveth to my hands;
Job ends his long defence with an oath: chapter after chapter of "if I have done this, then let that fall on me." Verse 7 is one link in that oath, and it traces a fall in three stages — the foot, the heart and eyes, then the hands.
Chapter 31 comes at the end of Job's long reply to his friends.
Having spoken these sorrowful complaints, Job closed his lengthy speech, as we see in Job 31. He ended with a series of firm declarations that almost amounted to oaths. His friends had accused him of definite sins and wrongdoing. As to these things his conscience was clear, though, as we have seen, he admitted he was not pure in the sight of God. So he strongly affirmed that he had not committed the kinds of evil his friends alleged or hinted at.
Verse 7 names the eyes and the heart in that order. Job had guarded the first.
Job approaches this part of his life with the boldness of conscious innocence. He had closed his eyes, the way into the heart, by settled purpose — a "covenant," against even a look at what might stir up passion. In the Sermon on the Mount, our Lord had shown that real purity must lie in the heart. It is not just a matter of holding back in outward conduct (Matthew 5:27-28). In an hour of spiritual sloth, David had allowed his eyes to wander, and had fallen (2 Samuel 11:2). Job was conscious that God watched his every step, and appeals to Him to be tested, weighed in the balance (verses 5, 6).
The verse ends at the hands, where a stain marks something taken. One writer traces the same three stages in Achan, a man who took plunder he had been forbidden to touch.
This man had followed his natural inclinations, he had begun where we all begin, where the first man began. "I saw" (v. 21). "When the woman saw" is said in Genesis 3:6. He had eyes which knew how to pick out the fine things among the spoil. His eyes were the way into his heart, but there was no sentry to watch, no challenge to sound out in case of an attack. The forbidden thing takes possession of the heart through the eyes, and stirs it to lust: "I coveted them." "Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin": "I took them."
Job asks God to put him on the scales. He stands on a clean conscience, and one writer says God was after more than that.
"If I have walked with falsehood and my foot has hastened to deceit... let me be weighed in a just balance, and let God know my integrity." He had a perfectly good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the great principle of complete submission to God and vindicating Him. He is right and wise in everything — not only in what He does, but in what He allows.
Verse 7 does not stand alone. Verse 8 supplies the "then."
Job was so confident that he could make this declaration. If he had stepped out of the way, or his heart had followed his eyes, or his hands were soiled — then let another eat what Job sowed. In fact, let his harvest be totally rooted up (vv. 7-8).
Nothing Job claims here is false. The problem lies in what he does with it.
Job was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That plainly proves he had never really been in the presence of God... Job ends his speech with these chapters (Job 29, 30, 31), which express his good opinion of himself. He had told his whole heart out. He was self-satisfied. The grace of God had worked in him, and in a lovely way. But the present effect was to make him lovely in his own eyes — because the human heart is treacherous, and because he was not in God's presence, which exposes it.
A second writer names what drove it.
But we must take note of the self-righteousness which moved Job to speak of himself in this way. He was putting himself on show rather than giving glory to God. No doubt at bottom he was a man of genuine piety, but it is no glory to set out one's own glory.
- Eyes — Job guarded them by deliberate covenant, because a look is where the trouble starts.
- Heart — the eyes are the way in; what the eye admires, the heart soon follows.
- Hands — the chain finishes in action: saw, coveted, took. That is the stain Job denies.
- Harvest — he stakes his crops on it, asking that another eat what he sowed if the charge is true.
- Glory — the record is genuine. Yet Job turns it into his righteousness, and shows off himself instead of God.
Let me sow, and another eat; and let mine offspring be rooted out.
Job has come to the end of his long defence, and he stakes everything on it. If the charges against him are true, let his own fields turn against him. The words are a self-curse, an oath sworn openly before God. They raise the question the whole book is driving at: is a blameless record the same thing as being right with God?
This chapter is Job's closing statement. One writer sets out its sweep and its form: a man inviting God's judgment on himself if he is lying.
Here, at the end of his last speech, Job makes the most solemn and complete declaration of his innocence. He is not denying what he had already admitted about the condition of man, his own included. But he flatly rejects the thought of serious wickedness hidden under a fair appearance, which God could now be at war with, as his friends had supposed. Take his personal purity, and again his conduct as a married man, his behaviour toward his servants, his care for the poor and exposed, his hatred of idolatry and greed, his practice of generous and hospitable ways, and his hatred of hypocrisy. In all these he prays that, if he is lying, he may be put to utter shame. He appeals to the Almighty for an answer, and declares that he is willing to face the closest examination, where no evil can be hidden or tolerated.
The verse is the second half of a sentence. Verse 7 sets the terms; verse 8 names the price if he has broken them.
Job was so confident that he could say this: if he had stepped out of the way, or his heart had followed his eyes, or his hands were dirty, then let someone else eat what Job sowed. In fact, let the whole harvest be torn up by the roots.
Verse 7 traces sin back from the hands to the heart to the eyes. Job had made a covenant about what he would look at.
Job had deliberately shut his eyes — the way into the heart — making a "covenant" against even a look at what might stir up passion. In the Sermon on the Mount, our Lord had shown that real purity must lie in the heart, and not only in outward self-control (Matt. 5:27-28)… In a time of spiritual laziness, David let his eyes wander, and he fell (2 Sam. 11:2). Job knew that God watched his every step, and he asks God to test him and weigh him in the balance.
Job reaches for a penalty Scripture uses elsewhere: a man works, and someone else enjoys the result. One writer applies it to ordinary life.
The contrast is seen in that same chapter of Deuteronomy. God warns Israel that if they turn aside from His statutes and laws, others will eat the fruit of their land and all their labours (Deut. 28:33). And do not forget that in a sense this can still be true of the children of God. If they ignore His word and live for themselves, God will often step in and deal with them through their circumstances. How many have set out to get on in the world! They have worked hard and long to reach their goal, and then, just as it came in sight, all the fruit of their toil vanished.
Job's claim was true. He was not the hypocrite his friends imagined. Yet one writer points past the clear conscience to what Job still lacked.
He had a completely good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the great principle of full submission to God, and of vindicating Him — He is right and wise in everything, not only in what He does, but in what He allows.
Another writer names what Job's "righteousness" covered.
This "righteousness" had to do with his outward conduct, because the searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. His friends had charged him with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not this, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not. But outward correctness does not in itself count as righteousness before God.
- Record. Job's defence audits his whole life — purity, marriage, servants, the poor, idolatry, greed, hospitality, hypocrisy. On every count his conscience is clear.
- Root. The test of verse 7 runs inward: hands, heart, eyes. God tests purity at the source, not at the surface.
- Oath. He backs the record with a curse on himself. If he lied, let another eat his harvest and let his crop be torn up by the roots.
- Limit. A clear conscience is real, but it is not the end. Outward correctness does not count as righteousness in God's presence.
- Rest. Self-judgment and submission to God finish what a clean record cannot. Job is right before his friends; he has still to be right before God.
If my heart have been enticed unto a woman, so that I laid wait at my neighbour's door,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Let my wife grind for another, and let others bow down upon her.
In this chapter Job speaks under oath, listing sins he has not committed and the punishment he would accept if he lied. Verse 10 is the penalty clause: if another man's wife enticed him, let him lose his own wife.
Chapter 31 is Job's closing defence. Its force lies in its form. Job does not just deny the charges; he denies them under oath.
After these sorrowful complaints, Job closed his long speech, as we see in Job 31. He ended with a series of strong declarations that almost amount to oaths. His friends had accused him of definite sins and wrongdoing. As to these things his conscience was clear, though, as we have seen, he admitted he was not pure in the sight of God. So he strongly affirmed that he had not committed the kinds of evil they alleged or hinted at.
The sin behind verse 10 is one his friends never charged him with. Job raises it himself.
Job opens this sevenfold protest of purity and integrity. He dwells on a side of his character and conduct that even his friends had not openly challenged. They had hinted at general wickedness — turning away from God, violent dealings with the needy and others. But they had never touched the subject of personal purity.
This oath costs Job something. He puts his own household on the line.
In all this he was pure — willing to have his own home violated if this were not so. Here we get a glimpse of his family life, as holy as that of Isaac, Joseph, and the purest of the patriarchs.
Job's self-curses match the sins they answer. What the sin would take from another, he asks to lose himself.
Men might draw their conclusions from appearances. Job could still ask God to weigh him in a just balance, and to see whether he had used deceit or turned aside from the way. If he had, then let another reap the results of his labour. And let punishment reach even his own wife for such consuming evil on his part.
Another writer notes how settled Job's mind was about this sin:
Again, he insists. Suppose a woman had enticed his heart. Suppose he had taken the first step in going to his neighbour's house with evil motives. Then let his wife leave him and choose another. "For," he says, "that would be wickedness, deserving of judgment. For that would be a fire that consumes to destruction, and would root out all my increase" (vv. 11-12). He had no doubt about the wickedness of such things, even though many careless people today think otherwise.
Job could swear to verse 10 because of the promise he made in verse 1. He stopped this sin at the door, not at the deed.
Job had shut his eyes, the way into the heart, by a settled purpose — a "covenant" against even a look at what might stir up passion. In the Sermon on the Mount our Lord showed that real purity must lie in the heart. It is not just a matter of outward restraint (Matt. 5:27-28)… "How can I do this great wickedness and sin against God?" said Joseph when the temptress came at him (Gen. 39:9). In an hour of spiritual sloth, David had let his eyes wander, and had fallen (2 Sam. 11:2).
Job lived long before God gave the law. That makes this inward standard remarkable.
This chapter shows that before God gave the law, a high standard of morality was still found among God-fearing men. That standard looked not only at the outward act but also at the inward motive behind the act.
Job's claims may be true, but there is still something wrong with the speech.
But we must take note of the self-righteousness that moved Job to speak of himself like this. He was putting himself on display rather than giving glory to God. No doubt at bottom he was a man of genuine piety, but it is no glory to set out one's own glory.
- Oath — Verse 10 is not a wish but a penalty Job accepts on himself. The chapter is a series of declarations "almost amounting to oaths."
- Offence — The sin in view is adultery with a neighbour's wife. His friends never brought that charge; Job raises it himself.
- Payment — The punishment fits the crime: take another man's wife, and lose your own. Job was willing to see his own home violated if he were guilty.
- Prevention — He could swear to this because he made a covenant with his eyes. He shut the door to the heart, and he did it long before God gave the law.
- Problem — The standard is high and the conscience clear. Yet Job is displaying himself instead of glorifying God, and he admitted he was not pure in God's sight.
For this is an infamy; yea, it is an iniquity [to be judged by] the judges
In his last speech Job swears that he is innocent of adultery. Here he names that sin for what it is — shameful in itself, and a crime for judges — though he lived long before God gave the law.
He is not claiming to be sinless before God. He is refusing his friends' charge that hidden wickedness explains his suffering.
Here, at the close of his last speech, Job makes his most solemn and complete declaration of innocence. He is not denying what he had already admitted about man's condition, his own included. But he flatly rejects the thought of grievous wickedness hidden under a fair exterior, which God might now be waging war against, as his friends had supposed.
On the charges his friends brought, his conscience was clear.
His friends had accused him of definite sins and wrongdoing. As to these things his conscience was clear, though, as we have seen, he admitted he was not pure in the sight of God. So he strongly affirmed that he had not committed the kinds of evil that were alleged or hinted at.
The "heinous crime" here is adultery with a neighbour's wife. Job adds a penalty to his denial. If he is lying, let his own home suffer the same wrong.
He returns to the subject he began with. He dwells on the sin of adultery against a neighbour (verses 9-12). In all this he was pure — willing to have his own home violated if it were not so. We get here a glimpse of his family life, equal in holiness to that of Isaac, Joseph, and the purest of the patriarchs.
Job lived before God gave the law. Yet he can call this act a crime for judges to punish.
This chapter shows that before God gave the law, God-fearing men still held a high standard of morality. That standard looked not only at the outward act but at the inward motive behind it. See the examples: he speaks of what he thought, or did not think, in verse 1; of his heart walking after his eyes, in verse 7; and of his heart enticed in secret, in verse 27.
The same writer lists what Job already knew to be wrong without any written commandment.
Again, he knew that deceit and false witness was wrong; see verse 5: that adultery was wrong; see verse 9: that idolatry was wrong; see verses 26-28; since the worship of sun and moon was the most primitive form that idolatry took.
Job does not stop at the human court. Judges could sentence him, and God watches every step he takes.
He judges unclean lusts as well as actions. He does this in the fear of Him who had power to cast soul and body into hell — Him who meanwhile took notice of all his steps. Trusting in gold, the covetousness the New Testament calls idolatry, was as hateful to his spirit as giving the highest lights in creation the glory due to God alone. In those early days that sin seems to have been just as clearly punishable before the judge as the sins of those who schemed to destroy another man's home. (Compare verses 9-11 with verses 26-28.)
after_note: DISCUSS
The guard against this sin starts earlier, at the eye and the ear.
Set a strong guard around your outward senses. These are Satan's landing places, above all the eye and the ear. Take care what you take in through them; empty talk seldom passes without leaving some stain on the heart. And as for your eye, do not let it wander; impure objects cause impure thoughts. Job knew his eye and his thoughts were likely to go together, and so to secure the one he makes a covenant with the other.
Job's record was true. The fault lay in the telling of it.
But we must take note of the self-righteousness that moved Job to speak of himself like this. He was putting himself on display instead of giving glory to God. No doubt at bottom he was a man of genuine piety, but it is no glory to set out one's own glory.
Another writer weighs the speech as a whole.
He reviews his life to prove that he is clean in the sight of God and of man. But what are his declarations after all? Nothing but the filthy rags of his own righteousness — the empty boasting of a good, moral man, such as we hear on all sides.
- Covenant — Job's purity started at the eye. He made his agreement in advance, before temptation came.
- Crime — the act he refuses is adultery against a neighbour, and he stakes his own home on the truth of his denial.
- Conscience — Job knew this sin deserved punishment long before God gave the law. He judged the motive as well as the deed.
- Court — two courts sit over the same act: human judges who could sentence him, and God who counts every step he takes.
- Caution — the record was true, but Job put himself on display instead of giving God the glory.
For it is a fire that consumeth to destruction, and would root out all mine increase.
Job is at the end of his long defence. Point by point he swears to his own purity. Here he swears he never let his heart follow another man's wife. Verse 12 gives his reason: such sin is not an incident but a fire, and fire does not stop where it is lit.
This line closes the first block of Job's final speech. One writer maps the chapter out by subject:
The main subjects of the chapter group themselves under seven heads: (1) Declaration of chastity and uprightness (verses 1-12). (2) Kindness at home and abroad (verses 13-23). (3) Refusal of all forms of idolatry (verses 24-28)…
So the "fire" is Job's closing argument on purity, not an aside. Another commentator sets the whole chapter in its setting: after describing his former brightness and then the blight that had fallen on him, Job speaks under something close to oath.
In Job 31 he protests his innocence in the most solemn way, his personal purity, his equity and consideration of his servants, his remembrance of the poor, his horror of idolatry, his freedom from vindictiveness, his cultivation of hospitality, his refusal to conceal any wrongdoing, and this without fear before the Almighty.
The ESV keeps the word here as a name: Abaddon. Older translations render it "destruction." Either way, it is not a general word for loss.
Revelation 9:11 shows this name to be the same as Apollyon, "the destroyer," who is called "the angel of the bottomless pit." It is perhaps not so much a name of Satan as his character personified. It occurs six times in the Old Testament. Three of those link it with hell (sheol): Job 26:6; Proverbs 15:11; Proverbs 27:20. One links it with death: "Destruction and Death say," Job 28:22. One links it with the grave: Psalm 88:11. In all these passages, and in Job 31:12, it is translated "destruction."
So Job's fire burns all the way down, to the place tied to death and the grave. It does not stop at the man who lights it. It tears out everything his life has produced.
Job is not describing a passing regret. His verdict on it was settled long before, and it cuts against a common attitude today.
He was settled in his judgment about the wickedness of such things, though his thinking was contrary to that of large numbers of careless people today.
The fire has a starting point. Job had shut it off earlier in the chapter, and others were tested at the same place.
His eyes, the avenue to the heart, had been closed by full purpose — a "covenant," against even a look at what might stir up passion. In the Sermon on the Mount our Lord showed that real purity must lie in the heart, and not only in outward self-control (Matthew 5:27-28)… "How then can I do this great wickedness and sin against God?" said Joseph when the woman tried to tempt him (Genesis 39:9). In an hour of spiritual sloth, David had allowed his eyes to wander, and had fallen (2 Samuel 11:2).
Job's self-examination went further than his accusers could have borne. He made it before One who sees everything.
We can be sure of this: not one of the friends who all but accused him could have afforded to test himself as Job does here. He judges unclean lusts as well as actions; and this in the fear of Him who had power to cast soul and body into hell — Him who meanwhile took note of all his steps.
What Job says about this sin is right. The problem is who he is defending while he says it. His conscience was clear on these charges. The wrong note is in how he presses them.
But we must notice the self-righteousness that moved Job to speak of himself like this. He was putting himself on display rather than giving glory to God. Deep down he was no doubt a man of real godliness, but there is no glory in putting your own glory on show.
Another writer shows why a clear conscience is still not righteousness before God:
This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, had to do with his outward conduct. The searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not this… We too know that he was not, but outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness in the presence of God.
- Spark. The fire starts at the eye. Job had made a covenant there, because purity is a matter of the heart and not only of outward conduct.
- Fire. Job treats this sin as a fire. It is not one act with a boundary. Fire keeps consuming once lit.
- Ashes. Abaddon, the name behind "destruction," is linked elsewhere with death, the grave and the pit. The fire burns all the way down.
- Roots. It does not only burn what stands; it tears up a man's whole increase, everything his life had produced.
- Warning. Job's verdict on the sin is sound; his mistake is using it to display himself. A clear conscience before men is still not righteousness before God.
If I have despised the cause of my bondman or of my bondmaid, when they contended with me,
Near the end of his long defence, Job turns to the way he treated the people who worked for him. He does not measure himself by custom or by what his neighbours thought. He asks what he would say if God stood up to question him.
Job is not only saying he never mistreated a servant. He is saying that when a servant had a complaint and pressed it against him, he heard it out. Older translations read that he did not despise their cause, where the ESV says he did not reject it.
Had Job despised the cause of any of his servants, whether male or female? (v.13). If this were true, he asks, what should he do when God raised the question with him? For God made these servants just as He had made Job. Job had surely weighed this fact long before, so he was not guilty of oppressing the creatures of God (vv.14-15).
Job stood far above his servants in rank. That never changed how he saw them.
He shows, very movingly, that even in his high position his heart never forgot that his servants were of the same race and the same human family as himself. There was no room in him for cold personal pride. And it was not only a strong sense of ties within his own household. His compassion always went out to suffering people — the widow and the fatherless, the needy and the naked.
Job's reason comes a moment later. The same God formed both him and his servant in the womb. That fact cuts both ways, and neither rich nor poor should forget it.
In what really matters, how small the difference is! They come into the world alike, and they stand alike when the world passes away. "The rich and the poor meet together; the LORD is the Maker of them all." The poor man has a right to remember this, and the rich man should not forget it.
Another writer traces Job's fairness back to the man himself:
He starts with his household, whose well-ordered character grew out of the purity of its master. He claims that he was fair in all his dealings with his servants, recognising their common nature and their common standing before God, "who shows no partiality."
Job held back because he knew he would answer for it one day. The same duty rests on anyone with people under them, and it falls on the master:
Servants are especially dependent on their masters. Their position itself is a claim on their masters for what is just and fair, and that covers both treatment and wages. They can safely leave themselves in their masters' hands, confident that their interests will be guarded. Masters are urged to this, knowing that they have a Master in heaven — One who watches all their conduct and holds them responsible for dealing faithfully with their servants. He shows no partiality.
So the duty becomes a question the master keeps putting to himself:
Every Christian master should keep asking himself about his servants, "What is just? What is fair?" And he is to remember that he himself is a servant, with his own Master in heaven.
Job's account of himself is true. Yet this chapter is also the peak of his self-defence, and the book will not leave him there.
Read chapters 29-31, and you will say, if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man. There is not a man in all your town that can say as much as Job said, and say it truly. As to his kindness to the poor, he was the very opposite of the lying charges brought against him. So he lets memory list every good act of his life, but all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I, I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
Commentators differ on how hard to press this. Some stress that Job's claims were true. Others weigh what was wrong in the way he made them:
Divine truth, as well as divine love, will not allow him to wrap himself in these garments of self-righteousness. They are, for the most part, borrowed clothes belonging to God, to whom Job gives not one bit of glory.
- One Maker. The same God formed master and servant in the womb. The difference between them is real, but it is not deep. Both come into the world alike, and both stand alike when it ends.
- One claim. Servants depend on those over them. That dependence is itself a claim on the master for what is just and fair, in treatment and in wages.
- One Master. Whoever holds authority holds it under Someone. He has a Master in heaven who watches his conduct and shows no partiality.
- One question. Job held back by asking in advance what he would answer when God rose up. The daily form of that question is short: "What is just? What is fair?"
- One limit. No record of kindness, however true, gives rest to the soul. Job could say more than most men and say it truly, and it was still all of no use.
What then should I do when God riseth up? and if he visited, what should I answer him?
Job is making his final defence. Here he turns to how he treated the men and women who worked in his house, and he asks not whether they could complain, but what he would say if God stood up and called him to account.
One writer notes how thorough Job's self-examination is. Few of his accusers could have faced the same test.
Job tests himself carefully and in detail against a very full list of possible offences. He does this toward God as well as toward man, for failing to do good as well as for self-indulgence and other sins. We can be sure that not one of the friends who as good as accused him could have afforded to test himself the way Job does here. He judges unclean desires as well as actions. He does it in the fear of Him who had power to throw soul and body into hell — Him who all the while was taking note of every step he took. He shows, very movingly, that even in his high position his heart never forgot that his servants were of the same race and the same human family as himself. That left no room for cold personal pride.
Job's question has one answer: he would have nothing to say. The reason follows at once — the same God made both him and his servants.
Had Job despised the cause of any of his servants, whether male or female? If this were true, he asks, what should he do when God raised the question with him? For God made these servants just as He had made Job. Job had thought about this fact long before, we are sure, so he was not guilty of oppressing God's creatures.
Proverbs says the same about rich and poor.
"The rich and the poor meet together; the LORD is the Maker of them all." The poor man has a right to remember this, and the rich man ought not to forget it. Job had it clearly before him.
Job lived before the law was given at Sinai, and before any part of Scripture was written.
The law had its value — God does nothing in vain. Yet we can see how high the moral standard was for the soul and for the daily walk of godly men outside Israel, before the law was given at Sinai. The patriarchs of Genesis show it. God had spoken words. He had also acted in solemn ways with men, both one by one and as a whole race, in grace and in judgment. All this came long before He inspired men to write His mind by divine power. And faith received His word and thought over His dealings, with rich profit, before there was any Scripture.
Job's question survives into the New Testament instruction to masters, where the same accountability is spelled out.
Masters are then urged, and reminded that their Master is in heaven, and that "there is no partiality with Him." He notices threats and oppression. The cry of the poor and needy reaches His ears, and He will repay it in the coming day. Both master and servant answer to the one Lord, and they will stand together at the same judgment seat.
This shared standing does not cancel a master's authority. It changes how he uses it.
They will govern, and govern firmly, as they should, because God has entrusted their authority to them. But they will remember that those under them answer directly to their Master in heaven. Together with the masters, they are the Lord's servants. So in this respect they are equal, despite the difference in their positions on earth. This of itself would prevent all harshness.
Job's conduct really was good, and one writer says so plainly. But listing it shows what Job was leaning on.
Just read chapters 29-31, and you will say, if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man. There is not a man in all your town that can say as much as Job said, and say it truly. As to his kindness to the poor, he was the very opposite of the lying charges brought against him. So he lets memory recount every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I, I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
- One Maker. The same God formed Job and his servants, so their complaint carried weight he could not dismiss.
- One question. He ran his household by asking ahead of time what he would answer when God rose up to inquire.
- One judgment-seat. The New Testament tells masters that their Master is in heaven and shows no partiality. Employer and employee stand there together.
- One effect. Shared accountability does not weaken authority. It removes harshness from it.
- One limit. Job's record was real and admirable, yet listing it brought him no peace. Remembered good works cannot justify a man before God.
Did not he that made me in the womb make him? and did not One fashion us in the womb?
Job is defending his record, and he comes to the men and women who worked in his house. Behind each servant he sees a Maker — the same One who made him.
Job puts himself under the eye of God. Verses 13 and 14 set up the question this verse answers:
If I despised the right of my bondman or of my bondmaid, in their contending with me, what then shall I do when God arises? And when He visits, what shall I answer Him?
The same reasoning appears in the proverb that the Lord is the maker of rich and poor alike. One writer draws out how far that levelling goes, and who most needs reminding of it:
In the essentials, how little is the difference! Alike they come into the world, and alike they stand when the world passes away. "Rich and poor meet together; the Lord is the maker of them all." The poor man is entitled to remember this, and the rich man ought not to forget it.
God's hand made the servant as well as the master. Job had settled that long before:
Had Job despised the cause of any of his servants, whether male or female? If this were true, he asks, what should he do when God raised the question with him? For God made these servants just as He had made Job. Job had considered this fact long before, we are sure, so that he was not guilty of oppressing the creatures of God.
The verse points to the womb, where God's work on a person begins in secret. One writer follows a word for embroidery into Psalm 139:
The Hebrew word rekem means "embroidery." The verb from it appears in a striking passage in that wonderful psalm, the 139th. That psalm traces God's thought and care of man from his beginnings in the womb: "My substance was not hidden from you, when I was made in secret, and skilfully wrought (that is, embroidered) in the depths of the earth." And indeed, the intricate interweaving of nerves, veins and arteries can be compared to nothing more justly than to a marvellous embroidery. This is true of every person. Can God be lacking in consideration and tenderness for a being on whom He has bestowed such wonderful care?
Job's defence starts at home, with his servants, and then moves outward:
He begins with his household. Its well-ordered character grew out of the inherent purity of its master. He asserts his fairness in all his dealings with his servants, recognising their common nature and standing before God, who "shows no partiality." Then he moves out to the needy poor: the fatherless and the widow had shared his food, and he had warmed them with his clothing. In brief, he was as a father to the orphan and as a son to the widow. Surely we have here an illustration of religion that is "pure and undefiled" (James 1:27).
The same reckoning is set before masters today:
Masters are then urged, and reminded that their Master is in heaven, and that "there is no partiality with Him." He notes threatening and oppression. The cry of the poor and needy comes up in His ears, and He will repay it in the coming day. This verse should read, I believe, "their Master and yours is in the heavens." That adds an important point: both master and servant are responsible to the one Lord, and will stand together at the same judgment seat.
The record is clean. One writer still asks why Job put it into a speech:
To all of this we can only say, True and excellent — but why should he speak of it? Why not let his fear of God keep him from these things, rather than boast of them?
- One Maker. The same God who formed Job in the womb formed his servants there. Rank comes later; the making is shared.
- One womb. God's care begins in secret, before anyone can earn it. No one He shaped with such skill is beneath your consideration.
- One standard. Fairness starts inside your own house, with your servants. From there it reaches the poor, the orphan and the widow.
- One reckoning. Job asks what he will answer when God rises up. Masters today have their own Master in heaven, and both will stand at one judgment seat.
- One caution. The record was true and excellent; the fear of God that produced it should have kept Job from parading it.
If I have withheld the poor from [their] desire, or caused the eyes of the widow to fail;
Job has reached his final defence. He goes through his life item by item, daring God to find the fault his friends keep insisting must be there. Here he touches money and mercy — what he did with what he had when the poor and the widow came to his door.
This chapter is not a general claim of innocence.
Job tests himself formally and in fine detail, with a very full list of charges. He does this toward God as well as man — for failing to do good, as well as for self-indulgence and other sins. We can be sure of this. Not one of the friends who as good as put him on trial could have afforded to test himself as Job does here.
Verse 16 is not about cruelty. It is about what Job would be guilty of if he had kept what was his and done nothing.
In verses 16-21 he speaks of sins of omission also. Suppose he had not helped the poor, or had ignored the plight of the widow. Suppose he had kept all he had for himself, so that the fatherless went hungry. Suppose he had seen someone die for lack of clothing, or a poor man with nothing to cover him. Suppose the heart of the poor had never blessed Job, never warmed by the fleece of his sheep — then he says, "let my arm fall from my shoulder."
Job's care was not charity at a distance. It reached into his own household and out to those who had no one.
Reaching out beyond his household to the needy poor, he let the fatherless and the widow share his food, and he warmed them with his clothing. In brief he was as a father to the orphan, and as a son to the widow. Surely we have here an illustration of religion that is "pure and undefiled" (James 1:27).
Kelly adds another mark of it: Job never used his influence with others to take the smallest advantage.
His compassion always went out to people who were suffering — the widow and the fatherless, the needy and the naked. This was no passing gesture. He cared for them steadily and tirelessly, as a father would, and he watched himself carefully, so that he never took the least advantage of them through his influence with others.
Job lived before God gave the law at Sinai, and before any Scripture existed. That makes his standard here remarkable.
The law had its value, for God does nothing in vain. Yet look how high the moral standard already was — in the soul, and in the daily walk of godly men outside Israel, before the law came from Sinai. And it was not only in matters of right and wrong, which conscience could judge more or less exactly, depending on how much light a man had. We can also see what God's revelation did inside the soul, in its affections and its judgments.
Everything Job says here is accurate. The trouble is what he is doing with it.
Now, just read chapters 29-31, and you will say, if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man. There is not a man in all your town that can say as much as Job said, and say it truly. As to his kindness to the poor, he was the very opposite of the lying charges brought against him. So he lets memory recount every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I — I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
Kelly adds what God meant to do about it.
The friends were completely wrong. They had no excuse and no kindness. What Job says was true, but he does not yet know the whole truth about himself — as no one could, until He came who is the Truth, and proved it in grace to the very end at His cross. But Job was taken up with himself and pleased with himself. God would set him free from that, and bless him more than ever. No human being will boast in God's presence. Job had to learn this — to boast only in Him.
- Test. Job puts himself on trial with a detailed list of charges. It covers not only wrong he did, but good he may have failed to do.
- Omission. Verses 16-21 name a second kind of sin. It is keeping all you have while the poor, the widow and the fatherless go without.
- Reach. His care began in his own household and reached the widow, the orphan, the needy and the naked. It was steady, not occasional.
- Source. This standard was already there before Sinai and before any written Scripture. Conscience, and what God had revealed, shaped the soul.
- Limit. Every word of it was true, and none of it gave him rest. God meant to free him from himself and bless him more than ever.
Or have eaten my morsel alone, so that the fatherless ate not thereof,
Job is near the end of his long defence of his whole life. He is not listing crimes he avoided. He is listing help he never withheld — bread shared with the fatherless. The claim is true, and God Himself had said as much. Yet this same chapter is where Job's goodness betrayed him.
Job is not answering a charge of harm he did. He is answering a quieter charge: the good he left undone. One commentator groups this verse with those around it as a list of good left undone:
In verses 16-21 he speaks of sins of omission also. Suppose he had not helped the poor, or had ignored the plight of the widow, but had kept all he had for himself, so that the fatherless went hungry. Suppose he had seen someone die for lack of clothing, or any poor man with nothing to cover him. Suppose the heart of the poor had never blessed Job, with no warmth from the fleece of his sheep. Suppose he had not taken up the cause of the fatherless in the gate, the place of judgment. Then, he says, "let my shoulder blade fall from my shoulder, and let my arm be broken from its socket."
The punishment Job calls down on himself is the loss of the arm that should have given. He treats holding back from the poor as a crime worth a broken body.
The sharing was not occasional charity. It was a settled relationship — Job took the place of the missing father, and also the place of the missing son:
Moving out to the needy poor, he shared his food with the fatherless and the widow, and he warmed them with his clothing. In short, he was a father to the orphan and a son to the widow. Here we surely have an illustration of religion that is "pure and undefiled" (James 1:27).
Notice what Job is measured by: his own morsel. The fatherless ate what he ate.
Job lived before Israel had any written commandments. Even so, this chapter holds a high standard — one that reaches behind behaviour to what drives it:
This chapter shows that before God gave the law, God-fearing men still held a high standard of morality. It was a standard that weighed not only the outward act but also the inward motive behind the act.
Job does not exaggerate. That is what makes this chapter uncomfortable:
Job's misery was complete, yet in this chapter he returns to the defence of his whole life. That life was more upright than any other man's. God had said so to Satan long before (Job 1:8), so there is no reason to doubt what Job says of himself. But he did not see one thing: declaring his own goodness was itself sinful pride.
The flaw is not in the record but in who reads it aloud. The same facts on another man's lips would have been a tribute:
There is as grand a description as you can have of an admirable saint, in Job 31. But the misfortune is, it was Job talking about himself. Now, it is a fine thing to be eloquent about other people's goodness; but it is not a fine subject for oneself, and there is what betrayed Job.
Job's claim rests on food he handed over, not on sympathy he felt. One writer presses the same difference between saying and doing:
It is one thing to preach grace and another thing to act it. It is well to preach, but it is also well to act. Indeed, the preaching will be worth little if not combined with acting. It is well to instruct the ignorant, but it is also well to feed the hungry. The latter may involve more self-denial than the former. It may cost us nothing to preach, but it may cost us something to feed, and we do not like to have our private store intruded upon.
- Omission — Job's defence is not that he did no harm. It is that he withheld no help. Keeping it all for himself while the fatherless went hungry would have been sin enough to forfeit his arm.
- Adoption — He did more than donate. He became father to the orphan and son to the widow — and that is what pure and undefiled religion looks like.
- Motive — Job lived before God gave the law, yet this chapter reaches past the outward act to the inward motive behind it.
- Cost — Preaching may cost us nothing. Feeding the hungry costs us something, because it intrudes on our private store.
- Pride — Every word Job says is true, and God had said it first; the failure is that Job is the one saying it. Goodness is a fine subject on someone else's lips, not your own.
(For from my youth he grew up with me as with a father, and I have guided the [widow] from my mother's womb;)
Job's last speech is a sworn defence of his whole life, listed sin by sin before God. Verse 18 breaks in with a memory of an orphan and a widow, and it raises two questions: who is the father here, and can a good record settle anything before God?
The verses around it list kindnesses Job never withheld — and the curse he calls down on himself if he is lying:
In verses 16-21 he speaks of sins of omission also. Suppose he had not helped the poor. Suppose he had ignored the plight of the widow, and had kept all he had for himself, so that the fatherless were left hungry. Then, he says, "let my arm fall from my shoulder, let my arm be torn from the socket" (v.22). In contrast to this, notice his words in parenthesis (v.18), "But from my youth I reared him (the fatherless) as a father, and from my mother's womb I guided the widow."
An orphan has no father. A widow has no husband. Job did not just send help. He stepped into the empty place:
Reaching out to the poor in need, he shared his food with the fatherless and the widow, and he warmed them with his clothing. In short, he was as a father to the orphan, and as a son to the widow. Surely we have here an illustration of religion that is "pure and undefiled" (James 1:27).
"From my youth" is the key phrase. It turns single acts of kindness into a settled way of living. And that way of living reached far beyond Job's own household:
It was not only a strong sense of kinship inside his own household. His compassion always went out to suffering people — the widow and the fatherless, the needy and the naked. He did not help them now and then. He cared for them as a father does, with care that was constant and never tired. And he kept watch over himself, so that he never used his influence with others to take the least advantage.
The phrase "from my mother's womb" pushes the claim back to birth, and translations and commentators handle it in two ways. The writers above read Job as the one who raised the orphan. On the other reading, God is the father here, caring for Job from before his birth. That makes the end of the book sharper still:
The book of Job records God's lovingkindness in His dealings with this patient man from his earliest days (Job 31:18, amended). "He brought me up as a father, and guided me from my mother's womb." Yet Job is brought to confess, despite all that God had been to him, "I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes." In the end his sufferings set him free from himself, and even greater blessing marks the close of his story.
So Job's conscience was clear. Why did that not settle his case?
He had a completely good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the grand principle of full submission to God, and of vindicating Him. He is right and wise in all of it — not only in what He does, but in what He allows.
So the chapter ends in exhaustion, not peace:
If any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man... As to his kindness to the poor, he was the very opposite of the lying charges brought against him. So he lets his memory count up every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I, I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
- Parenthesis — The verse breaks into a list of things Job never did. His answer to the charge is a memory: he raised the orphan and guided the widow.
- Substitute — Job did more than give. He took the missing place: a father to the orphan, a son to the widow. That is religion pure and undefiled.
- Lifelong — "From my youth" marks care that was constant and never tired. It reached past his own household, and he never used his influence to take the least advantage.
- Reversed — On the other reading it is God who fathers Job from the womb. Job still ends by saying he despises himself and repents in dust and ashes.
- Not enough — The record is true, but a clear conscience toward people is not enough. "I, I, I did this" gives no rest. Job must still bow to God.
If I have seen any perishing for want of clothing, or any needy without covering;
Job's last speech is a sworn oath, and verse 19 is one of its clauses: if he ever let someone die for lack of clothes, let judgment fall on him. Two questions follow — what goodness is Job describing, and why does it leave him unsettled before God?
Verse 19 sits inside a long self-examination Job makes in God's presence. It weighs what he failed to do as much as what he did.
Job tests himself formally and in fine detail, with a very full list of charges. He does this toward God as well as man, for failure to do good as well as for self-gratification or other sins. We may be sure that not one of the friends who in effect accused him could have afforded to test himself as Job does here... His compassion always went out to suffering humanity — the widow and the fatherless, the needy and the naked. This was not now and then, but constant and tireless care, like a father's.
Job does not only deny cruelty. He denies indifference — and he attaches a penalty to the denial.
In verses 16-21 he speaks of sins of omission also. If he had not helped the poor or had ignored the plight of the widow... if he had seen anyone perish for lack of clothing or any poor man without covering; if the heart of the poor had not blessed Job, not being warmed by the fleece of his sheep... then he says, let my arm fall from my shoulder.
Job's giving reached outward to the poor. It put him into a family relationship with people who had no one.
He enlarges here on what he had already dwelt upon — denied by his friends — his benevolence, kindness and uprightness... Moving outward to the needy poor, the fatherless and the widow had shared his food, and he had warmed them with his clothing. In short, he was as a father to the orphan, and as a son to the widow. Surely we have here an illustration of "pure religion and undefiled" (James 1:27).
Read as a test of a life's fruitfulness, the verse asks the reader the same question it answers for Job.
To close, and to be practical — what is my life, your life? Am I, are you, a fruitful vine? Am I, are you, touching the need of the world for God's glory and as setting forth His character? Job says, "If I have... eaten my morsel myself alone, and the fatherless has not eaten of it... if I have seen any perish for want of clothing, or any poor without covering; if his loins have not blessed me, and if he were not warmed with the fleece of my sheep... then let my arm fall from my shoulder blade" (Job 31:16-22). Clearly Job was not an empty vine.
Commentators differ over this recital. Some see real kindness. Others hear a man pleading his own case too well.
Now just read chapters 29-31, and you will say, if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man. There is not a man in all your town who can say as much as Job said, and say it truly. As to his kindness to the poor, he was the very opposite of the lying charges brought against him. So he lets memory recount every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I, I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
The sharper reading calls the whole list, clothing included, Job's own righteousness.
He gives a review of his life to prove that he is clean in the sight of God and of man... But what are his declarations after all? Nothing else but the filthy rags of his own righteousness, the vain boasting of a good, moral man, such as we hear on all sides... Then he lists his great generosity. He had respect for the widow; he shared his bread with orphans; those who were naked he had clothed.
The same act appears in the Lord's words about the judgment of the nations. There the one who receives it turns out to be Himself.
And indeed what service could be more blessed than to clothe the naked and feed the hungry? The Lord Himself names these things as services rendered to Himself in the person of His "brothers." He will do so in the judgment of the living nations, when He sits on the throne of His glory. He says, "I was hungry and you gave me food... I was naked and you clothed me" (Matt. 25:35-36). This, as He explains, done to one of the least of His brothers, was done to Himself.
- Seen. Job's oath starts with an eye that saw someone perishing without covering. Failing to act on what you see counts as sin, not just a missed chance.
- Covered. Job warmed the needy from his own flock. That made him father to the orphan and son to the widow.
- Tested. Job dares to be weighed on failure in good as well as on open wrongdoing, a test his accusers could not have faced.
- Uncovered. The record is true, yet reciting it gives his conscience no rest. Commentators differ: some admire the list, others call it his own righteousness. Neither reading lets it settle him before God.
- Received. Clothing the naked is not lost effort: the King says such service was done to Himself.
If his loins have not blessed me, and if he were not warmed with the fleece of my lambs;
Job is answering his friends' accusations by walking through his own life. Here he points to a poor man who left his door warm instead of shivering. The wool came off Job's own flock, so the claim is concrete. Yet the way he tells it raises a second question: who was the good in Job, and who deserves the credit?
The verse belongs to a run where Job defends himself not for what he did, but for what he never failed to do.
In verses 16-21 he speaks of sins of omission also. Suppose he had not helped the poor, or had ignored the plight of the widow. Suppose he had kept all he had for himself, so that the fatherless went hungry. Suppose he had seen anyone die for lack of clothing, or any poor man without covering. Suppose the heart of the poor had not blessed Job, because it was not warmed by the fleece of his sheep. Then, he says, "let my shoulder blade fall from my shoulder, and let my arm be broken from its socket" (v.22).
The thanks Job speaks of comes from a part of the body, not from a speech. Where the ESV says "his body," older translations read "his loins."
The loins are the body's chief seat of strength, when they are properly belted for work.
So the blessing is the poor man's own strength giving thanks. Warmth had returned to a body that once lay exposed.
Job's care ran through his household and reached far past it. It also kept watch over itself.
His care was not only a strong sense of family inside his own household. His compassion always went out to suffering people — the widow and the fatherless, the needy and the naked. He did not help now and then, but with the constant, tireless care of a father. And he watched himself, so that he never took the smallest advantage by using his influence with others.
Another writer traces the same care outward, from the servants in Job's house to the poor at his door.
He starts with his household. Its good order grew out of the purity of its master. He claims he was fair in every dealing with his servants, since he saw that they shared his nature and stood before a God "who shows no partiality." Then he moves outward to the needy poor. The fatherless and the widow had shared his food, and he had warmed them with his clothing. In short, he was a father to the orphan and a son to the widow. Here we surely have an example of religion that is "pure and undefiled" (James 1:27).
The verse is not only a defence of one man. It is a measure anyone can hold up to their own life.
To close, and to be practical: what is my life, and what is your life? Am I a fruitful vine? Are you? Am I, are you, touching the world's need, for God's glory and to show His character?... Clearly Job was not an empty vine.
Everything Job says here is true. The trouble is the telling. A man wrapping himself in his own record has taken something that was never his to wear.
We cannot question the truth or the sincerity of all that he says. But we may well ask: is his conclusion a happy one even for himself?... Divine truth, as well as divine love, will not let him wrap himself in these clothes of self-righteousness. Most of them are borrowed garments that belong to God, and Job gives Him not the least bit of glory for them. The rest are only filthy rags, fit for the dust and ashes where Job will soon put himself.
The wool was real, and so was the warmth. The kindness came from God working in Job. Yet something was still missing, and God set out to deal with it.
Now Job needed this, and God saw that he needed it. He was gracious and godly, but he did not know himself. He had never seen God in a way that brought him to a real knowledge of himself in His presence. So God deals with him in a way that brings his sinfulness right out into the open. Then He sets him, with that sinfulness now clear to his conscience, in His own presence... Job had acted well, for grace had acted in him; but he did not know himself before God.
- Seen. Job counts failure to act as guilt. Passing a man with no covering would have been sin, not just a missed chance to do good.
- Given. The covering came off his own flock. Real mercy costs the giver something he owned.
- Warmed. The loins are the body's seat of strength. The poor man's restored strength is the thanks Job receives.
- Blessed. Steady care — from the servants in his house out to the widow and the orphan — is an example of religion that is pure and undefiled.
- Boasted. The deeds were true, but grace had worked them. Worn as self-praise, they become borrowed garments. The man who wears them still does not know himself before God.
If I have lifted up my hand against an orphan, because I saw my help in the gate
Near the end of his long defence, Job swears an oath about the town gate — the public court, where a strong man could ruin a weak one and stay within the law. He says he never used his power there against a fatherless child, and he stakes his own arm on it.
Job's claim is not that he never met an orphan. It is that he never pressed his advantage when the judges leaned his way. One writer draws out both halves of the picture: the influence Job had, and the case he refused to push. (His quotation reads "let my arm drop from my shoulder blade." The ESV renders the same line, "let my shoulder blade fall from my shoulder.")
While dwelling on his kindness, Job shows how he had not taken advantage of any legal technicality that would have cleared him in any harsh dealing with the needy. When he saw his "help in the gate" — the judges inclined to decide in his favour, not because they were bribed, but because they were giving him his just dues — he had not pressed his case against the orphans. If he had lifted his hand against them, he says, "let my arm drop from my shoulder blade."
Job is not speaking into the air. His friend Eliphaz had already made this exact charge. One writer shows how wide of the truth it was.
Eliphaz is only imagining what he thinks Job must have done to explain his troubles. "… You have sent widows away empty, and the arms of the fatherless have been broken. Therefore snares are all around you." You see, all the reasoning is quite mistaken.
So Job answers with the same image. Eliphaz spoke of broken arms. Job offers his own.
This oath sits inside a list of sins of omission. Neglect counts too: not feeding the hungry, not clothing the poor, not defending the fatherless in court.
In verses 16-21 he speaks of sins of omission also. Suppose he had not helped the poor, or had ignored the plight of the widow, but had kept all he had for himself, so that the fatherless went hungry. Suppose he had seen anyone die for lack of clothing. Suppose Job had not championed the cause of the fatherless in the gate, the place of judgment. Then, he says, let his own arm fall from his shoulder, torn from the socket.
Job lived long before God gave the law at Mount Sinai. Yet his moral standard is high. One writer traces that back to how God dealt with people before any Scripture existed.
This closing burst of indignant self-defence on Job's part is deeply interesting and instructive… We can see how high the moral standard was for the soul and for the walk of godly men outside Israel, before the law came from Sinai… God had spoken words. He had also worked in solemn ways with people, one by one and all together, in grace and in judgment. All this was long before He inspired men to write His mind by divine power. And faith received His word, and thought over His dealings, to rich profit, before Scripture existed.
Everything Job claims here is true. That is what makes the chapter so searching: a man can be right about his record and still need to judge himself.
He had a perfectly good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the grand principle of entire submission to God, and of vindicating Him — that He is right and wise in all, not only in what He does, but in what He allows.
The chapter ends without peace. One writer points to the reason: Job counts his own good deeds one by one.
Now, just read chapters 29-31. You will say that if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man… So he lets memory recount every good act of his life. But it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I, I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
- Gate. The scene is the public court, where Job had the judges' ear and could have ruined an orphan within the law.
- Hand. Innocence here is not only what Job did. It is the advantage he refused to press.
- Omission. Job's list counts neglect as guilt: not feeding, not clothing, not defending the fatherless.
- Arm. Job stakes his own arm on the claim: if he lied, let it fall from his shoulder.
- Rest. A clean record still leaves Job restless. A good conscience is not enough; he must submit to God and own that God is right.
[Then] let my shoulder fall from the shoulder-blade, and mine arm be broken from the bone!
Job's last speech closes with a string of solemn oaths. Each one names a sin he denies. Then he calls down a punishment on himself if the denial is false. Verse 22 is one of those punishments. Job offers up the very arm he could have raised against an orphan, broken out of its socket.
The arm comes into it because of a hand Job never lifted. He is thinking of a court case he could have won, and of the orphan he could have crushed by winning it.
While dwelling on his kindness, Job shows how he had not taken advantage of any legal technicality that would have cleared him in any harsh dealing with the needy. When he saw his "help in the gate" — the judges leaning to decide in his favour — he had not pressed his case against the orphans. They were not bribed; they were giving him his just dues. If he had lifted his hand against them, he says, "let my arm drop from my shoulder-blade."
(Ridout quotes verse 22 from an older translation here.)
The oath covers things left undone as much as things done.
In verses 16-21 he speaks of sins of omission also. Suppose he had not helped the poor, or had ignored the plight of the widow, but had kept everything for himself, so that the fatherless went hungry. Suppose he had seen anyone perish for lack of clothing, or any poor man without covering. Suppose the heart of the poor had not blessed Job, because the fleece of his sheep had never warmed him. Suppose Job had not championed the cause of the fatherless in the gate, the place of judgment. Then, he says, let my arm fall from my shoulder.
Job is not just listing good deeds. He is under attack. The self-curse denies that anything rotten hides under his decent surface.
Here, at the close of his last speech, Job makes the most solemn and complete protest of his innocence. He does not deny what he had already admitted about man's condition, his own included. But he flatly refuses the idea of grievous wickedness concealed under a fair exterior, which God could now be waging war against, as his friends had supposed. He lists his personal purity — and this as a married man too — his behaviour toward his servants, his remembrance of the poor and the exposed, his hatred of idolatry and greed, his generous and hospitable ways, his hatred of hypocrisy. If he is false in any of it, he prays to be put to utter shame.
The next verse gives the reason Job never lifted that hand.
He ends this section by showing that the fear of God was a vital matter with him (v.23). It was a terror to him even to think of the reality of God's destructive power against evil. He would not dare to offend One whose magnificence filled him with awe, to the point that he said, "I cannot endure."
That fear reached beneath behaviour to motive, and it did so long before any written law existed.
This chapter shows that before God gave the law, God-fearing men still held to a high standard of morality. That standard looked not only at the outward act but also at the inward motive that prompts it.
Everything Job swears here is true. The commentators still find something wrong with the swearing of it.
To all of this we can only say: true and excellent — but why should he speak of it? Why not let his fear of God keep him from these things, rather than boast of them?
The record itself is not in doubt. The question is what it counts for before God.
This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, concerned his outward conduct, because God's searching light had not yet entered his soul. He had been charged with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We too know that he was not. But outward correctness does not in itself count for righteousness before God.
- Arm. Job offers to have broken the very limb he could have raised against orphans in court. The punishment fits the crime he denies.
- Omission. The oath covers the poor left unfed, the naked left unclothed and the orphan left undefended. The arm falls for what Job withheld as much as for what he struck.
- Fear. Dread of God's power against evil kept that arm down. That fear reached the inward motive, not just the outward act.
- Answer. The friends claimed hidden wickedness lay under Job's fair exterior. The whole self-curse answers them: shame me, if it is true.
- Limit. The record is true, yet outward correctness is not righteousness before God. God's searching light had not yet reached the man who boasts of it.
For calamity from God was a terror to me, and by reason of his excellency I was powerless.
Job is closing his final defence. He has listed every wrong he never did to his servants, the poor, the widow and the fatherless. Now he names the reason he never dared to do them. But the verse raises a question. Is a life ruled by the fear of God also a life that can stand before God?
The verse is Job's explanation, not just another claim. One writer sees it as the close of the section, where Job names what drove him:
He ends this section by showing that the fear of God mattered deeply to him (v.23). Just thinking about God's real power to destroy evil filled him with terror. So he would never dare to offend One whose greatness left him in awe — to the point where he said he could not endure it.
Job was a man of wealth and high position. One commentator shows what the fear of God did to his heart toward the people below him:
He shows, very movingly, that even in his high position his heart never forgot that his servants were of the same race and the same human family as himself. There was no cold personal pride in him. And it was not only a strong sense of ties inside his own household. His compassion always went out to people who suffered — the widow and the fatherless, the needy and the naked. He did not care for them now and then, but with the steady, tireless care of a father. He also watched himself, so that he never gained the smallest advantage over them through his influence with others. The fear of God, and his angry defence of all such people, had worked in him so strongly that hardness was a complete stranger to his heart.
That fear did not only govern Job's public dealings. It reached his private life too. One commentator sets Job beside two other men tested in the same area:
Job insists that he is pure, and points out that the fear of God moved him — God, who would certainly repay the wicked for their sin. "How then can I do this great wickedness and sin against God?" said Joseph when a woman tried to seduce him (Gen. 39:9). In a time of spiritual laziness, David let his eyes wander, and he fell (2 Sam. 11:2). Job knew that God watched his every step, and he asks God to test him and weigh him in the balance.
The verse comes right after Job's oath about the fatherless. Job could have taken the fatherless to court and won, and still stayed within his rights:
As he speaks of his kindness to others, Job shows that he never used a legal loophole to excuse himself for dealing harshly with the needy. He saw his "help in the gate" — the judges ready to rule in his favour, not because they were bribed, but because they were giving him his due — and even then he did not press his case against the orphans.
Commentators differ here. Some read the verse as proof that Job truly feared God. Others ask why a man who fears God needs to talk about it at all:
To all of this we can only say: true and admirable — but why should he talk about it? Why not let his fear of God keep him from these things, instead of boasting about them?
Job's friends had called him a hypocrite. On that charge he was right to defend himself. But his defence answers the wrong court:
This "righteousness," as Job 29 will show us, had to do with his outward conduct, because the searching light of God had not yet entered his soul. His friends had charged him with being a deceiver and a hypocrite. He knew he was not, and he was not going to plead guilty to it for a moment. We know he was not either. But outward correctness does not in itself count as righteousness in the presence of God.
- Fear first. Job's kindness to the weak was not just soft feeling. Behind it stood his terror of God's judgment on evil.
- Fear softens. That same fear kept a rich man from growing hard. It made the widow and the orphan his constant care.
- Fear restrains. It held him back even when the judges in the gate would have ruled in his favour against the fatherless.
- Fear reaches inward. It governed his eyes and desires where no human court could ever have called him to account.
- Fear is not enough. A clear conscience before men answers his friends. But outward correctness is not righteousness before God. Job must still meet God Himself.
If I have made gold my hope, or said to the fine gold, My confidence!
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
If I rejoiced because my wealth was great, and because my hand had gotten much;
Job is near the end of his long self-defence, and here he puts his fortune on oath: he never gloated over what his own hand had piled up. Can a rich man say his heart was never in his money — and if Job could, why did God still have more to say to him?
One writer marks this as the third trap in Job's oath, and notes where the wealth came from.
"If I have made gold my trust" — now he turns to a third kind of snare — "or called fine gold my confidence, if I have rejoiced because my wealth was abundant" — and how many do — "or because my hand had found much." It was not merely inherited. He gained it by his own hard work, and by God's particular blessing on him.
One writer asks what lay behind Job's kindness to the poor, and names the danger that grows as riches grow.
Was Job showing kindness to the poor in order to gain some material benefit for himself? He completely rejects that thought in these verses. His wealth was great, yet he had not made gold his idol (verses 24-25). He did see the danger of setting his heart on riches as they increased, for covetousness is idolatry (Colossians 3:5). If he had any such motives, only God knew them fully, and Job was willing for God to examine him and judge him according to truth.
Another writer explains why gold, of all things, takes the place of God:
That which man considers most precious, which his heart craves and which ministers to his glory, he deifies; that is the root of idolatry. God is displaced and man exalted, in the exaltation of his idol.
Job's denial was not empty talk. His known habits with his money matched it.
His possessions were remarkably great. He had 7,000 sheep, 3,000 camels, 500 pairs of oxen, 500 female donkeys and a very large household, that is, many servants. He enjoyed the reputation of being the greatest of all the people of the east (verse 3). Often, when someone seeks to honour God by walking honourably, he will increase in wealth, even though wealth is not his object. There is no reason to doubt what Job said in chapter 29:11-17 about his genuine care for the poor, the fatherless, those perishing, the widow and the lame. So he was definitely not greedy of gain, but used his wealth in kindness toward those in need.
Everything Job says is accurate. The problem is that he says it:
To all of this we can only say: true and excellent, but why should he speak of it? Why not let his fear of God keep him from these things, rather than boast of them?
So a man can be clear of the love of money and still hold on to something God means to take from him.
The friends were wholly wrong, unjustifiable, and unkind. What Job says was true, but he does not yet know all the truth about himself. No one could learn that truth from God until He came who is the Truth, and proved it in grace to the uttermost in His cross. But Job was occupied and satisfied with himself. From this God would deliver him, and so bless him more than ever. No flesh shall glory in His presence; and this Job must learn — to glory only in Him.
The same danger runs on today, and it reaches past money into spiritual things.
To trust in prosperity, in earthly riches, is a danger for most if not all saints. It was so in the days of old when prosperity in earthly things was a mark of God's favour. How much greater the folly of trusting in them now, when God has shown our true riches to be heavenly and not earthly! To boast of spiritual gifts and attainments as if we had gained them by our own skill offends the Lord even more. He alone gives, as it pleases Him. It is to put God's blessings and favours in the place of God Himself.
- Snare. Gold is the third trap Job swears he escaped. His wealth was not merely inherited; he earned it by his own work, under God's particular blessing.
- Idol. Whatever a man treasures most and takes glory from, he ends up treating as god; That is the root of idolatry: it pushes God aside and lifts man into His place.
- Evidence. Job's claim stands up. He was the greatest man of the east, yet he spent his wealth on the poor, the widow and the fatherless. Riches were not his object.
- Blind spot. His words were all true — and still the question remains why he needed to say them. His fear of God should have kept him quiet.
- Deliverance. Job was satisfied with himself. God took that away to give him something better: not gold, not even a clean record, but glorying in the Lord alone. He offers the same exchange to anyone who trusts his own prosperity or his own attainments today.
If I beheld the sun when it shone, or the moon walking in brightness,
Job is at the end of his long self-defence, going through his life area by area and naming the sins he did not commit. Here he turns to the sky — and to the question of how looking at the sun or the moon could ever be a sin.
The verse names no idol and no shrine. One commentator points out what is missing here, and what Job was careful never to do:
Job means looking at the sun or moon in the way of adoration — bowing down to them, which was the earliest form of idolatry. We do not hear here of Baal or Ashtoreth, or of any of the shameful and wicked gods the nations worshipped. What we do hear of is a work of God of the highest kind. Yet Job leaned toward it in no way at all — not even the slightest act of honouring the creature!
In the next verse Job mentions the mouth kissing the hand. The gesture was a known mark of honour:
Permission to kiss the hand of a superior is a mark of honour. The heathen kissed their gods. When the object of worship was far away, like the sun or the moon, they kissed their own hand instead. That is why the most common New Testament word for worship is proskuneo, which comes from kuneo, meaning to kiss.
Job does not stop at the outward gesture. He also denies the pull of the heart behind it, and that inward test runs right through the chapter:
This chapter shows that before the law came, a high standard of morality was still found among God-fearing men. That standard covered not only the outward act but also the inward motive behind the act. Look at the examples. In verse 1 he speaks of what he thought, or did not think. In verse 7, of his heart following his eyes. In verse 27, of his heart being secretly enticed. In verse 33, of hiding his guilt and covering his sins, like Adam. This may remind us of the Sermon on the Mount.
This verse follows Job's denial that he trusted his wealth. One writer reads the two together as a single movement of thought:
Having spoken of his generosity, Job goes on to speak of wealth. He rejects the love of gold that is so common among people — that "covetousness, which is idolatry" (Col. 3:5). When his riches had increased, he had not set his heart upon them; gold had not allured him. And when he lifted up his eyes to the shining heavens, he had not given the glory to the sun, a creature of God, nor to the moon, "queen of heaven," walking in splendour. He had not even secretly blown them a kiss of worship, for that would have denied God; he would have been a hypocrite, well deserving punishment.
Why would a secret thought deserve judgment? Because of what it would say about God:
In contemplating the sun and the moon, had Job been enticed to worship them, as many others are enticed? Both of these are amazing objects, but Job looked higher than them and had not even secretly given them honour. He recognised that anything taking God's place in the heart is an idol. If he had allowed even a secret thought of that kind, it would have been sin deserving of judgment. It would have meant denying the God who is infinitely high above all.
Everything Job says here is true. But he is saying it in a speech that defends himself:
To all of this we can but say, True and excellent, but why should he speak of it? Why not let his fear of God keep him from these things, rather than boast of them?
- Creature. The oldest idolatry was not a carved image but the sun and moon — real works of God, given the honour owed to their Maker.
- Gesture. People kissed their hand to worship what they could not reach. The New Testament word for worship still carries that root.
- Heart. Job denies the secret pull of the heart as well as the visible act. The standard reaches the motive, not just the deed.
- Denial. Anything that takes God's place is an idol. To give it that place, even in thought, is to deny God Himself.
- Boast. All of it is true. Yet Job boasts of it, when his fear of God could simply have kept him from these things.
And my heart have been secretly enticed, so that my mouth kissed my hand
Job has been listing sins he never committed, and here he turns from gold to the sky — to the sun and the moon, the most magnificent things a man can look at. His test is not public bowing. It is whether his heart was ever drawn away in private, and whether a silent kiss of the hand toward a created light would count against him.
In Job's world, a person who honoured the sun would kiss his own hand and send the kiss toward it. One writer points out that even a secret kiss would have made Job a hypocrite:
When Job lifted up his eyes to the shining heavens, he had not given the glory to the sun, a creature of God, nor to the moon, "queen of heaven," walking in splendour. He had not even secretly sent them a kiss of worship. That would have denied God, and he would have been a hypocrite, well deserving punishment.
Job does not wait for the hand to move before he calls himself guilty. He names the heart first, and he names it as something that can drift quietly. This inward measuring runs right through the chapter:
This chapter shows that even before God gave the law, God-fearing men still held a high standard of morality. That standard looked not only at the outward act but also at the inward motive behind the act. Take these instances. He spoke of what he thought, or did not think, in verse 1. He spoke of his heart walking after his eyes, in verse 7. He spoke of his heart being secretly enticed, in verse 27. And he spoke of hiding his iniquity and covering his sins, like Adam, in verse 33.
No shameful idol is in view here. The sun and moon are God's own work, not some carved pagan figure. Job still treats the faintest lean toward them as a crime:
Now he looks at something quite different — "If I looked at the sun when it shone, or the moon moving in brightness," that is, in the way of any adoration. Bowing down to the sun or moon was the earliest form of idolatry. We do not hear of Baals or Ashtoreths or any of the disreputable and wicked heathen objects of worship. Here was a work of God of the highest kind, and yet no leaning toward it in any way — "and my heart has been secretly enticed, and my mouth has kissed my hand" — even the slightest form of acknowledging the creature! "This also would be an iniquity to be punished by the judge, for I would have denied the God who is above." There we have very sound doctrine.
The idolatry Job refuses tells us something about when he lived. One writer dates the book by it:
The Book of Job was written after the flood; there was no idolatry before the flood. The earliest idolatry was the worship of the sun, moon, and stars, and in the course of this book we shall see that this is the only idolatry Job refers to. It was common at that time, and later people fell into much more degraded forms of it.
Job is telling the truth. The problem is that he is the one advertising it, instead of leaving it to God:
When Job looked at the sun and the moon, had they enticed him to worship them, as they entice many others? (vv. 26-27). Both of these are amazing objects, but Job looked higher than them and had not even secretly given them honour. He recognised that anything that takes God's place in the heart is an idol. If he had been guilty of even secretly allowing this in his thoughts, then this would be iniquity deserving of judgment (v. 28). It would amount to denying the God who is infinitely high above all… Though Job was no doubt speaking truth, yet there was no reason for him to advertise what his character had been. Why did he not stop to consider that God knew his actions, his words and his motives perfectly? He could wait on God to bring to light the truth about His servant.
- Secretly enticed. The pull starts inside, before any hand moves — Job judges the motive, not only the act.
- Secretly kissed. A kiss thrown toward the sun was the smallest possible gesture of honour, and Job counts even that as guilt.
- Secretly denied. To give the least acknowledgement to a created light is to deny the God who is above it.
- Secretly seen. What no human eye could catch is still a crime before the Judge, because God knows the motive perfectly.
- Secretly weak. Job's record was true, yet he advertised it instead of waiting for God to bring the truth about His servant to light.
This also would be an iniquity for the judge, for I should have denied the God who is above.
Job ends his long defence by clearing himself of idolatry, and here he names the penalty he would have deserved if the charge were true. The verse raises two questions: why would a private movement of the heart count as a crime for a judge, and how does honouring anything in creation amount to disowning God?
What Job refuses is not a carved image but the two brightest things in the sky. One commentator traces where idolatry started:
Now he looks at something quite different — "If I beheld the sun when it shone, or the moon walking in brightness." He means any kind of adoration: bowing down to the sun or moon, which was the earliest form of idolatry. We do not hear of Baals or Ashtoreths here, or any of the other shameful and wicked things the nations worshipped. Here was a work of God of the highest order, but Job leaned towards it in no way at all — "and my heart has been secretly enticed, or my mouth has kissed my hand" — not even the slightest form of acknowledging the creature! … There we have very sound doctrine.
Just before this, Job mentions a kiss of the hand. A reference work explains that custom:
Permission to kiss the hand of a superior is a mark of honour. Those who worshipped false gods kissed them. When the object of worship was far away, like the sun and moon, they kissed their own hand instead (Job 31:26-27). So the most common New Testament word for worship, proskuneo, comes from a word meaning "to kiss."
Earlier in the same defence Job speaks of his wealth. One writer notes what money can become:
Though his wealth was great, he had not made gold his idol. He did realise the danger of setting his heart on his riches as they grew, because covetousness is idolatry (Colossians 3:5).
The same writer applies this to Job's thoughts:
He recognised that anything which takes God's place in the heart is an idol. If he had allowed even a hidden form of this in his thoughts, it would be iniquity deserving of judgment. It would amount to denying the God who is infinitely high above all.
Job does not treat this as a small slip. One writer weighs what a single hidden kiss would have cost him:
When he lifted up his eyes to the shining heavens, he had not given the glory to the sun, a creature of God. Nor had he given it to the moon, "queen of heaven," walking in splendour. He had not even sent them a secret kiss of worship. That would have denied God, and he would have been a hypocrite, well deserving punishment.
What Job says here is true. The problem is that he says it at all:
Though Job was no doubt speaking truth, there was no reason that he should advertise what his character had been. Why did he not stop to consider that God knew his actions, his words and his motives perfectly? He could have waited for God to bring to light the truth about His servant.
One writer sends the reader back over Job's three closing chapters:
Read chapters 29-31, and you will say, if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man. There is not a man in all your town that can say as much as Job said, and say it truly. … So he lets memory recount every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I, I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
- Creature — Job's oath covers the oldest idolatry of all. The sun and moon are not shameful idols. They are God's own works, and honouring them is still honouring a creature.
- Secret — The offence starts inside. A heart drawn away, or a kiss of the hand no one sees, is already idolatry. Anything that takes God's place in the heart is an idol.
- Judge — Job calls it a crime for a judge, not a private weakness. Worship given in secret would turn his open honouring of God into hypocrisy that deserves punishment.
- Denial — Giving glory to a creature does not add something to God. It denies the God who is above all. Covetousness counts as idolatry for the same reason.
- Rest — Job's record here is true, and still useless for peace. He could have waited for God to clear him. Instead the repeated "I" leaves him where a case built on good works always leaves a person.
If I rejoiced at the destruction of him that hated me, and exulted when evil befell him;
Job has finished answering his friends and is now speaking under oath about his own past life. In this verse he speaks about how he treated people who wished him harm. He denies that he ever enjoyed their downfall — a strange thing for a man to raise in his own defence.
Job builds the whole chapter as a legal defence. He lists the charges his friends bring and swears he is clear of each one.
Having spoken these sorrowful complaints, Job closed his long speech. As we see in Job 31, he ended it with a series of solemn declarations that almost amounted to oaths. His friends had accused him of definite sins and wrongdoing. As to these things his conscience was clear, though, as we have seen, he admitted he was not pure in the sight of God. So he strongly affirmed that he had not committed the kinds of evil that were alleged or hinted at.
Job rules out two things: private pleasure at an enemy's ruin, and any profit he might take from it. The next verse extends the same denial to what Job said out loud.
It was clearly a concern to him that he should not rejoice when trouble came to one who hated him. He would not use such an occasion to profit from that person's misfortune either (v.29). In fact, he had not even allowed his mouth to sin by asking for a curse on that person's soul (v.30). Actually, this is only normal for one who has faith in the Lord Jesus (Rom. 12:20), so it was no reason for Job to boast.
Job denies that he ever gloated over a fallen enemy. What he rules out is not an act, but a small pleasure taken in another person's trouble.
This is a very common snare for people. They take a little pleasure when their adversaries come to grief, or are troubled.
Job does not leave this as a private claim about his own heart. He points to the people who lived in his house and could contradict him.
Job's strong point is his kindness to his fellow men. Here he declares that even to his enemies he had been just. He had not been glad at their calamity, nor even in secret wished a curse to blight their life. He could call the men of his own household to bear witness.
Job lived long before Israel received the law at Sinai, and before anyone had written a word of Scripture. Yet his conscience reaches past his conduct into the motives of his heart.
This closing burst of indignant self-defence on Job's part is both interesting and instructive. The law had its value, for God does nothing in vain. Yet we can see how high the moral standard already was for the soul and the walk of godly men outside Israel. It was high before the law came from Sinai, as we see in the patriarchs of Genesis. This is not only a matter of right and wrong, which conscience could judge more or less exactly, according to how much light a person had. We also see what divine revelation did in the soul, in its affections and its judgments. God had spoken words. He had also worked in solemn ways with people, one by one and all together, in grace and in judgment. All this was long before He inspired men to write His mind. Faith received His word and thought over His dealings, to rich profit, before there was any Scripture — though Scripture, once given, added much to the blessing of those who had it.
Everything Job says here is accurate. The problem is not what he says, but what saying it does for him.
The friends were wholly wrong, unjustifiable, and unloving. What Job says was true, but he does not yet know all the truth about himself. No one could learn that truth from God until He came who is the Truth, and proved it in grace to the uttermost in His cross. But Job was occupied and satisfied with himself. From this God would deliver him, and bless him more than ever. No flesh shall glory in His presence; and this Job must learn — to glory only in Him.
- Oath. The verse belongs to a sworn defence. Job answers each charge by swearing he never did it.
- Heart. What he denies is not an action but a feeling — gladness at the ruin of a man who hated him, and any gain taken from that ruin.
- Mouth. The denial then reaches his speech. He never let his mouth ask for a curse on that man's life, and his household could testify.
- Early. Job held this standard before Sinai and before a word of Scripture existed. Conscience and God's own revelation had already shaped godly men outside Israel.
- Not enough. Every word of it is true, and still it is not enough. Job is satisfied with himself, and God means to bring him to glory only in Him.
(Neither have I suffered my mouth to sin by asking his life with a curse;)
Job's last speech is his great effort to justify his whole life, and here he reaches the people who hated him. He never celebrated their downfall, and he never even asked out loud for their ruin — but can a record that clean quiet a troubled conscience before God?
The verse belongs with the one before it. Job is describing how he acted when trouble struck someone who wished him harm. Here he moves the claim from his actions to his speech — to the curse that would have asked for that man's life.
Job speaks now of his attitude toward mankind in general. It clearly mattered to him that he should not rejoice when trouble came to someone who hated him. He would not use such a moment to profit from that person's misfortune (v.29). In fact, he had not even allowed his mouth to sin by asking for a curse on that person's soul (v.30). This is only normal for someone who has faith in the Lord Jesus (Rom. 12:20), so it was no reason for Job to boast.
The test Job applies goes deeper than public behaviour. A person can keep a straight face and still hope for an enemy's collapse.
Job's strong point is his kindness to his fellow men. Here he declares that even to his enemies he had been just. He had not been glad at their trouble, nor even secretly wished a curse to blight their life. He could call the men of his own household as witnesses.
Job's claim sounds unremarkable until you measure yourself by it. Is this a rare temptation, or a common one?
"If I have rejoiced at the ruin of him who hated me, or exulted when evil overtook him" — a very common snare for people. They take a little pleasure when their adversaries come to grief, or are in trouble. "I have not let my mouth sin by asking for his life with a curse."
Another summary of this defence puts it sharper still: Job rules out the wish as well as the word.
He most solemnly disowns all joy over an enemy's disaster, though he had not asked for it in even the most indirect way.
Why should a single sentence matter so much? One commentator, writing about the tongue, points to who the other person is.
The great principle is plain beyond all question. No inconsistency could be worse than to use the tongue one moment to bless God, and the next to curse men God made in His own likeness. We are the objects of His loving purposes. God has blessed us out of sheer mercy, so we should be the last to curse anyone. Instead of cursing others, we want them to obey the truth and share the blessing. We want them to join us in blessing Him who is the source and giver of it all.
Nothing in Job's claim is false. The question is what a clean record can actually do for him.
He had a perfectly good conscience, but that is not enough. There is the great principle of self-judgment. There is also the great principle of complete submission to God and of clearing His name. He is right and wise in everything, not only in what He does, but in what He allows. It is all for good.
Another writer names the danger in speaking about yourself like this.
But we must notice the self-righteousness that moved Job to speak of himself like this. He was putting himself on show rather than giving glory to God. No doubt he was at bottom a genuinely godly man, but there is no glory in setting out one's own glory.
Job 31 lists one good act after another, and verse 30 belongs on the list. But where does the list leave Job himself?
So he lets memory recount every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I — I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
- Heart. Job denies the inward pleasure people take when an enemy comes to grief — commentators call it a very common snare.
- Mouth. He would not let his speech do what his heart refused. Cursing a man made in God's likeness contradicts blessing God.
- Witness. He never even wished the curse in private, and he could call his own household to vouch for him.
- Conscience. A clear conscience is real, but not enough on its own. Beyond it lie self-judgment and full submission to God.
- Rest. Every good act recalled still leaves the spirit unsettled — "I did this, I did not do that" cannot give peace.
If the men of my tent said not, Who shall find one that hath not been satisfied with his meat? --
Job has been listing, under oath, the sins he has not committed. Now he dares the men of his own tent to name one person he ever let go hungry.
The claim sits at the end of a short run about how Job treated people who wished him harm. He would not gloat over their troubles. He would not even wish them ruin in secret. Then he calls his own household to the witness stand.
Job's strong point is his kindness to his fellow-men. Here he declares that even to his enemies he had been just. He had not been glad at their calamity, nor even in secret wished a curse to blight their life. He could call the men of his own household to bear witness. Had anyone ever said they knew a hungry man whom he had not satisfied with his own food? No stranger was ever left beside his home in the street. His door was always open to them — as we say today, "the latch string was always outside."
The witnesses are not distant admirers. They shared his living space and saw what came off his table every day.
Job's close neighbours ("men of my tent") could bear witness that Job left no one without food (v.31). No traveller near Job had to stay in the streets: he did not forget to welcome strangers (v.32).
The verse reads oddly in English because it is a challenge, not a statement. Job invites anyone who ate at his table to contradict him.
He could appeal to the people who knew the habits of his life best. Had one single person ever left him unhappy with the food he gave? Had a stranger near him ever been left without shelter?
The older word "meat" in this verse means food in general. The writers read it as the fare from Job's own table.
Everything Job says here is true. The chapter is one of the finest descriptions of a good life anywhere. The trouble is not the content. It is the speaker.
These wonderful questions of the Almighty laid Job in the dust for the first time... That man who was such a fine answerer of others, and particularly eloquent about himself! For there is as grand a description as you can have of an admirable saint, in Job 31. But the misfortune is, it was Job talking about himself. It is a fine thing to speak well of other people's goodness. But it is not a fine subject for yourself, and that is what betrayed Job.
Real giving is meant to be hidden — even from the giver. That is where Job's account of his open table went wrong. He could still recite it.
Here lay Job's failure. Satan's attacks never touched it. Neither did the lack of sympathy, nor even the suspicion of his friends. He was a most gracious man, but he thought about it, instead of thinking only of God who worked in him. To this he had to be brought, and he was: to boast only in God, to judge himself, and to submit with all his heart. Part of the lesson was that his left hand should not know what his right hand did. This, on the contrary, right up to the end of his appeal (Job 31), he knew only too well.
Job's defence closes in complete confidence. God answers it — not by disputing the facts, but by changing the man.
His final word can be summed up in one sentence: "I am clean." The next time he opens his lips, he says, "Behold I am vile." The rest of the book will teach us how he came to this.
(Older translations read "Behold, I am vile"; the ESV has "Behold, I am of small account.")
- Witnesses. Job calls the men of his tent as witnesses. They lived closest to him, so they could expose him if his generosity were a fiction.
- Table. Their evidence is food. No one could name a single person who left his house still hungry.
- Enemies. The same kindness stretched past friends to people who hated him, whom he refused to gloat over or curse.
- Mirror. The record is true and admirable. But Job is the one reciting it. Giving is meant to be hidden even from ourselves — the left hand not knowing what the right hand does.
- Turn. A man who could sum himself up as "I am clean" is later brought to say "I am vile." The rest of the book shows how he got there.
The stranger did not lodge without; I opened my doors to the pathway.
Job's last speech is a long defence of his whole life. One of its final claims is about his front door: no stranger ever slept outside it. That line raises two questions. How high could goodness reach before the law was given? And why did a man this generous still fall?
A traveller with no host had nowhere to sleep but the street. Job says his door stood open to the road instead. One writer puts that open door in everyday terms:
Job's strong point is his kindness to his fellow men. No stranger was ever left beside his home in the street; his door was always open to them — in our modern phrase, "the latch string was always outside."
Job does not expect anyone to take his word alone. He points to the people best placed to contradict him: those who ate at his table and knew his daily habits.
He solemnly denies any joy over an enemy's calamity — and he had never asked for that calamity, not even in the most indirect way. He could appeal to the people who knew his daily habits best. Had a single person ever left him unhappy with the food he gave? Had he ever left a stranger near him without shelter?
Job lived long before God gave the law at Mount Sinai. Yet his standard of right and wrong already stood this high:
This closing burst of angry self-defence by Job is deeply interesting and instructive. The law had its value, for God does nothing in vain. Yet we can see how high the moral standard already was for godly men outside Israel, in the soul and in the daily walk, before the law came from Sinai. The patriarchs of Genesis show the same. And this is not only a matter of right and wrong, which conscience could judge more or less exactly, depending on how much light a man had. We also see what God's revelation did in the soul, in its affections and its judgments.
Scripture presses the same welcome on believers. One writer gathers the passages:
One fruit of faith much commended in Scripture is the one urged on us in passages like these: "Seek to show hospitality" (Romans 12:13). "Show hospitality to one another without grumbling" (1 Peter 4:9). "Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares" (Hebrews 13:2). "I was a stranger and you welcomed me" (Matthew 25:35).
Job's account is not exaggerated. God Himself had said the same about him long before:
Though Job's misery was complete, he returns in this chapter to the defence of his whole life, a life more upright than that of any other man. God had said the same to Satan long before (Job 1:8). So there is no reason to doubt what Job says of himself. But he did not realise that the very act of declaring his own goodness was itself sinful pride.
So the fault lies not in the record but in the speaker. Kelly puts it plainly:
Job 31 gives as grand a description of an admirable saint as you could ever have. But the trouble is, it was Job talking about himself. It is a fine thing to speak warmly about other people's goodness. It is not a fine subject for yourself, and that is what betrayed Job.
- Open door. Job's claim is concrete: no traveller near his home slept in the street, because his door stood open to them.
- Open witness. He rests the claim on the people who knew his daily life. Anyone who ate at his table could have contradicted him.
- Open light. He lived before the law came from Sinai, yet his standard was already high. Conscience and God's revelation had done real work.
- Open home. Scripture asks the same welcome of believers: show hospitality, do not neglect strangers, take in the one with nowhere to go.
- Closed on self. The facts were true, and God had said them first. The fault was that Job said them about himself, and that boast betrayed him.
If I covered my transgressions as Adam, by hiding mine iniquity in my bosom,
In his last defence Job lists what he has not done. Here he reaches the deepest charge of all: not the sin itself, but the hiding of it.
Job claims openness, not sinlessness. Nothing in his life was arranged for the dark. The line can be read two ways: "as others do," or "as Adam."
Job now declares his complete openness. He was not afraid of the great, and did nothing behind closed doors that he would not have said publicly. He had not acted as people so often do, hiding their sins from human eyes. Or, as our translation and many others render the words, he had not acted "as Adam," who hid from the presence of God to conceal the shame of his guilt. Job walked in the light, where everyone could see him.
Job lived long before Israel had the written law. Yet he knew the garden story and what it meant. The quote below uses an older translation, reading "as Adam."
"If I covered my transgressions as Adam, by hiding my iniquity in my bosom" — you notice that he knew the story of Adam's fall well, and found it interesting and profitable. There we have just what anyone today sees, looking back with the light of Christ. There was the great sin of Adam.
Adam sewed fig leaves and hid himself. That is the picture behind Job's words. "Covering" means trying to keep God Himself from seeing.
He was willing to face the test: had he covered his transgression, as Adam did when he used fig leaves, as though this could deceive the Lord? (v.33) Someone might cover his sin because he fears public criticism and the contempt of families. Job was sure he had no reason for such fear. He had no reason to hide at home from the eyes of critics (v.34). His life had been open and aboveboard.
A guilty conscience does not push a person toward God; it pushes him away and then supplies him with excuses. Adam's answer in the garden is the pattern.
You talk of a good conscience. But the best conscience a sinner has only drives him as far as he can get from the presence of God. Do you call it a good conscience here in Adam, getting away from God and then judging for himself about his state? "I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself." The same is true even of a believer who falls into sin. There is darkness in the sin, and fear in the conscience after the sin. Then, when he is sure he must get back into the presence of God, he tries to excuse himself if there is no full confession. You will always find that conscience, where the heart is wrong, tends toward inventing deceit. What did Adam say? I am guilty, pardon me, Lord? No, he practises deceit.
Scripture sets one alternative against the fig leaves, and it is not better concealment but open confession.
"Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy." Every attempt to cover up sin is a failure. People do so much of this today — not just covering individual sins, but denying sin itself... All these inventions, which sweep aside the declarations of the infallible Word of God, are "covering up." There can be no mercy for those who deny sin and sins. Man's fig leaves must be torn away. He still uses them to cover his nakedness. There must be confession, repentance, self-judgment, and then of course trust in Him who died for the ungodly.
Job's claim was honest as far as it went. Yet spreading out his own clean record became a covering of another kind.
In Job you also see a heart that depends on God, even while it rebels against Him. It is a heart that turns toward God and cannot find Him. It is a heart that knows God, and so claims for Him qualities the cold reasonings of his friends cannot attribute to Him. Still, Job is pleased with his own integrity. Out of it he makes a covering for himself in self-righteousness. That covering hides God from him, and hides Job from himself as well.
- Covering denied. Job swears he never buried a sin in his own heart. He lived where people could see him, not behind closed doors.
- Covering explained. Adam's fig leaves are the model. They try to keep guilt out of God's sight, as though anyone could deceive God.
- Covering exposed. A bad conscience never drives a person toward God. It drives him away, then invents excuses — in Adam and in believers alike.
- Covering removed. The one who conceals will not prosper. The one who confesses and forsakes finds mercy. That means confession, repentance, self-judgment, then trust in Him who died for the ungodly.
- Covering unnoticed. Job's clean record became a covering of self-righteousness. It hid God from him, and it hid Job from himself.
Because I feared the great multitude, and the contempt of families terrified me, so that I kept silence, and went not out of the door, ...
Job's last speech is a long defence of his innocence. Verse 34 finishes a sentence he began the line before: if he ever hid his wrongdoing, let him answer for it. The sin in view is not theft or cruelty. It is something quieter — the cover-up, and the fear of people that drives it.
Verses 33 and 34 belong together. Job's claim is that he never had a reason to keep his head down:
He was willing to be tested too as to whether he had covered his transgression, as Adam did when using fig leaves, as though this could deceive the Lord (v.33). One might cover his sin because he fears the criticism of the people and the contempt of families. But Job was confident he had no reason for such fear. He had no reason to hide at home from the eyes of critics (v.34). His life had been open and honest.
The comparison in verse 33 reaches back to the oldest cover-up in the Bible. One commentator points out what Adam did instead of owning his sin:
You notice that Job knew the very interesting and helpful story of Adam's fall. There was the great sin of Adam. Instead of humbling himself before God, and going to meet God to tell Him how he had disgraced himself, Adam hid himself away. And the clothing he put on showed that he was no longer innocent.
Adam's covering achieved nothing, and what drove him into hiding still drives people now:
Adam's apron could not screen him from the eye of God; and he could not stand in His presence naked; therefore he fled to hide himself. This is what conscience will do at all times. It will cause man to hide himself from God.
Job names the exact pressure that makes people hide: the crowd's opinion and the scorn of respected families. Pilate, the governor at Jesus' trial, is the standing example of a man who gave in to it:
Pilate was not the last who has agreed to what was wrong for the sake of short-term gain. Such a course may look successful at the time. But it very often turns out anything but happy for the person in the end. Conscience will speak at some point, and make itself heard. And the people he tried to please at the expense of righteousness may turn round and attack the one who acted to satisfy them… Weak, and afraid of popular opposition or resentment, he yielded against his conscience and better judgment. "The fear of man lays a snare" (Prov. 29:25).
The fear Job names is fear of what the neighbours will see. But a man who shuts his door still has a witness inside the room:
God knows your most secret sin: "You have set our iniquities before You, our secret sins in the light of Your presence" (Ps. 90:8). As He sees when you shut your door to pray, and will reward your sincerity, so when you do it to sin in secret, He will reward your hypocrisy. The word tells you of an informer you have in your own heart — conscience. It goes along with you, and it witnesses all your cleverly laid plots. What it sees, it writes down, for it is a court of record.
Job's answer to all this is that he never went indoors and stayed silent. Translations of the line before differ, and one commentator gives both readings:
Job now declares his complete openness. He was not afraid of the great, and did nothing behind closed doors that he would not have declared publicly. He had not acted as people so often do, hiding their sins from the eyes of others — or, as our translation and many others render the words, "as Adam," who hid from the presence of God to conceal the shame of his guilt. Job walked in the light, where all could see him.
Yet his openness had a flaw underneath it. Not fearing the crowd's contempt is one thing. Needing the crowd's respect is another:
Job was living, for a man of faith, too much in the good opinion of other people as well as in his own good opinion. There is where he was quite wrong. And Christ and Christianity put us in our true place if we are faithful: we have to face a hostile world.
- Cover — verse 34 finishes the "if" of verse 33: the sin in view is hiding wrongdoing, and Adam's fig leaves are the pattern.
- Crowd — Job names what drives the hiding: fear of the crowd's criticism and the scorn of respected families.
- Cost — the fear of man lays a snare. Pilate bought peace with the crowd, and later lost it to his own conscience.
- Conscience — a closed door hides sin from neighbours only. Conscience is a court of record, and secret sins stand in the light of God's presence.
- Caution — Job's openness was real. Yet he still leaned too hard on other people's good opinion, and on his own.
Oh that I had one to hear me! Behold my signature let the Almighty answer me! And let mine opponent write an accusation!
Job has reached the end of his long defence, and now he signs it. His last words are not a confession but a demand: let God answer, and let the accuser put the charge in writing.
Job treats his defence as a legal document and puts his name at the bottom.
He reaches the climax: he is chaste, just, God-fearing, kind, sincere — what has he to fear? He challenges all; he wishes he had someone to hear him. "Here is my signature!" he cries. I sign my name to the list of my virtues. "Let the Almighty answer me!" "Let my adversary put his charges in writing."
Job is not afraid of a written indictment; he wants one. He is so sure the charge is false that he would wear it in public.
"Let the Almighty answer me!" — Job wanted to hear His voice about it — "Oh, that I had the indictment written by my adversary!" Suppose someone who wished him harm laid charges. "I would take it," he says, "on my shoulder, and bind it as a crown to me." He was confident that it was false. "I would declare to him," that is, to the Almighty, "the number of my steps; as a prince I would go near to him."
Job's challenge is not aimed at his friends only. It reaches to God as the accuser.
We cannot believe that anyone but an honest man could challenge his accusers like this. If God is his adversary, let Him write the charges in a book!
Everything Job says about himself is true. The problem is what he does with it: he clears himself and gives God no glory.
He looks over his whole life and character, and concludes that he welcomes both the indictment of man and the judgment of God. We cannot question the truth and the sincerity of all that he says, but we may well ask: is his conclusion a happy one, even for himself? He shuts the mouths of his friends, and he seems thoroughly satisfied with himself. Suppose God were to let it rest there — is the sight of a completely self-vindicated man a pleasant one? Divine truth, as well as divine love, will not let him wrap himself in these clothes of self-righteousness. For the most part they are borrowed garments that belong to God, and Job gives Him not the least bit of glory. All the rest is only "filthy rags." They belong to the dust and ashes where Job will soon put himself.
Job gets what he asked for. God answers — and the man who planned to approach like a prince says something quite different.
"Let the Almighty answer me!" was Job's closing word (Job 31:35). He is now to have his wish granted; but how different the effect! "As a prince I would go near to Him" (v. 37), he had declared. "I am vile" is what he has to say when he hears His voice.
Job asked for a written case from God. One commentator finds that wish answered — though not in the spirit Job expected.
Job bursts into the urgent plea that someone in authority would hear him (v.35), and realises his only hope along this line is in "the Almighty." Why did He not answer Job's desperate cries? If God was taking the place of a prosecutor (which was certainly not so), why had He not written a book dealing with the whole case? Here, in early years, was the expressed desire for a book written by God! Now we know such a Book is written. It comes not from a prosecutor's viewpoint, but from that of God being for us. It shows His understanding of everything about us. Its object is both the glory of God and the greatest good for mankind.
- Signature. Job signs his own defence and asks God to answer it — the verse is a legal challenge, not a prayer of confession.
- Book. He wants the charge in writing because he is sure it is false; he would carry it on his shoulder and wear it like a crown.
- Adversary. Even if God Himself is the accuser, Job still wants the charges in writing. Only an honest man could challenge his accusers like that.
- Rags. His record is true, but the virtues are borrowed from God. A man cleared only by his own word is no pleasant sight.
- Answer. God grants the wish. The man who meant to approach as a prince says instead, "I am vile." The book Job wanted came from a God who is for us, not against us.
Would I not take it upon my shoulder? I would bind it on to me [as] a crown;
Job's long defence of his life ends here: he signs his name to it and dares his accuser to put the charge in writing. He would not hide the charge against him but wear it — and the rest of the book tests whether he was right to be so sure.
Job has just listed his purity, his fairness, and his care for the poor. Now he puts his name to that list and calls for the case against him.
He thus reaches the climax: he is chaste, just, God-fearing, kind, sincere — what has he to fear? He challenges all; he wishes he had someone to hear him. "Here is my signature!" he cries. I sign my name to the catalogue of my virtues. "Let the Almighty answer me!" "Let my adversary produce his charges in writing."
A written charge would shame most men. Job talks about his like a victory medal. He expects it to clear him, not convict him.
Once more he asks the Almighty Himself to answer. This is his sworn statement, as we would say, with his mark or signature. He wants the other side's statement in the case. Far from dreading it, he longs for it. He says he would wind it round his head like a wreath of honour. Far from hiding it, he would tell it all out, drawing near like a prince instead of a coward with a guilty conscience.
The confidence rests on one assumption — that the accusation could not stand up.
"And that my adversary had written a book, surely I would take it" — if anyone who wished him ill laid charges, "I would take it," he says, "upon my shoulder, and bind it as a crown to me" — because he was confident that it was false.
Job asks for something that did not yet exist: a book from God about his case. He got his wish, though not in the form he imagined.
Say God was taking the place of a prosecutor — which He was not. Why then had He not written a book dealing with the whole case? Here in early years was the expressed desire for a book written by God! Now we know such a Book is written. It does not come from a prosecutor, but from God being for us. This Book shows His understanding of everything about us. Its aim is both the glory of God and the greatest good for mankind.
But the Book we now have does not say about Job what he expected.
No doubt he was thinking that a book written by God would praise Job's character and conduct. But that view was far from the truth. Such a book of God does commend faithful conduct. But it just as plainly condemns the pride of man. It does not lift man up at all; it glorifies God. But that same Book declares the greatness of the grace of God. He saves the souls of sinful men who turn to God in true repentance and accept the salvation that is in Christ Jesus. How worthwhile indeed that we should carry the Word of God on our shoulders, and have it as a crown to adorn our heads!
Job was not bluffing. His problem lay elsewhere — in the place he gave his own record.
Job's thoughts are mixed. He is not quite meeting God as a sinner, but as a man aware of "the root of the matter" in his heart. His mistake is to confuse this with his own personal worthiness, and so spoil the very thought of grace. Who of all the sons of men could stand before a thrice holy God and say, "I am clean"?
Verse 37 tells us how Job planned to walk up to God. The meeting, when it came, went differently.
Nor did Job, when he actually met God, approach Him "like a prince." Rather, he took his rightful place in saying to God, "Behold, I am vile" (ch. 40:4). In other words, he approached God "as a sinner"; then God later gave him the place of a prince.
(Newer translations render Job's confession there as "Behold, I am of small account.")
Job's speech closes with a line saying his words are finished. One writer reads that line as a pause, not an ending.
He even challenged God to produce his life's record. He said, "I would take it upon my shoulder and bind it as a crown to me. I would declare the number of my steps, and as a prince would I go near to Him… The words of Job are ended." Oh no, Job, they are not. You could not possibly say more on your own behalf, but you will most surely speak again — and he did. Hear him as he lies prostrate in the dust, a broken and contrite penitent: "I had heard of You by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees You; therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes."
- Challenge. Job signs his own defence and dares his accuser to put the charge against him in writing.
- Confidence. He would not hide that charge. He would wear it like a wreath of honour, sure it could not touch him.
- Case. Job wanted a book from God about his case. We have one, and it comes from a God who is for us, not from a prosecutor.
- Correction. That Book praises faithful conduct, but it also condemns human pride. Job's flaw sat right there: he confused a true heart with being worthy.
- Contrition. Job meant to walk up to God like a prince. He ended in the dust instead, speaking again — this time to repent.
I would declare unto him the number of my steps; as a prince would I come near to him.
Job has just finished listing the evils he never committed. Now he wants a hearing with God — but is a clean record the right thing to bring into His presence?
Job's friends had accused him for chapter after chapter and failed to shake him. One writer reads this verse as the peak of that resistance — a dare aimed past his critics and straight at God:
Calamity had not broken him. Slander and scorn could not subdue his proud spirit. He would hold his head up without fear before the best of his fellow men, and even in the presence of the Almighty he would stand up as a prince. What could a man say after that? That surely was the climax, the limit, and Job felt it so, for he added, "The words of Job are ended." But they were not. The Almighty took up his challenge.
The verse does not say who Job would approach. Two candidates stand in the lines just before it, and one writer picks between them:
"Behold, my desire is that the Almighty would answer me" — Job wanted to hear His voice about it — "and that my adversary had written a book. Surely I would take it upon my shoulder, and bind it as a crown to me." If anyone who wished him ill laid charges, Job was confident they were false. "I would declare to him," that is, to the Almighty; it could possibly mean "the adversary" — "the number of my steps; as a prince I would go near to him." I think it is "to the Lord."
To give God "an account of all my steps" is to hand over a full record of one's life. The trouble is who Job offered it to, and what happened when the meeting came:
But God did not need Job to declare the number of his steps to Him: He knew them far better than Job did. And when Job did meet God, he did not approach Him "like a prince." Instead he took his rightful place and said to God, "Behold, I am vile" (ch. 40:4). In other words, he approached God "as a sinner"; then God later gave him the place of a prince.
(Job 40:4 is quoted there from an older translation. The ESV reads, "Behold, I am of small account.")
Job was not a fraud, and his defence was not invented. The fault lies deeper than honesty. It lies in what he did with his honesty:
Job's thoughts are mixed. He is not quite meeting God as a sinner. He meets Him as one who is conscious of "the root of the matter" in his heart. His mistake is to confuse this with his own personal worthiness, and so spoil the very thought of grace. Who of all the sons of men could stand before a thrice holy God and say "I am clean"?
Chapter 31 mentions God often. But notice the role He is given there, and where that leaves Job at the end:
God is left out except as He relates to Job's righteousness. His greatness, goodness and holiness, as themes of worship and joy, are ignored. At the close of all that he has to say, Job is as far from God as at the beginning; no, further. When we remember that all God's ways with man are to bring him close to Himself, we see the folly and sin of Job's course.
Job got the hearing he asked for. What ended was not the argument but the arguer. The difference lay in whose presence he now stood:
Before, he had been in the presence of man, and could more than hold his own with the best of them. In God's presence no creature can boast, and Job was at last in that glorious, holy Presence. All the "filthy rags" of an imagined personal righteousness dropped from him... "Therefore I abhor" — what? The whole past, every unjust suspicion, every hot accusation, every despairing, restless lament? Yes, and more — the author and source of these — "I abhor myself."
- Prince claimed. Job proposed to walk up to God with his life's record in hand and meet Him on level terms. The posture, not the record, was the problem.
- Prince challenged. God accepted the invitation. The man who said his words were ended was told to stand up and answer.
- Prince exposed. A true record of a good life is still not grace. Treating it as personal worthiness spoils the very thing Job needed.
- Prince silenced. Job could out-argue the best of men. In God's presence no creature can boast, and his self-defence fell away into self-abhorrence.
- Prince crowned. In the end he came to God as a sinner. Then God gave him the place of a prince — the place he had tried to take for himself.
If my land cry out against me, and its furrows weep together;
Job has spent three chapters defending his life, down to his kindness to the poor. Now he turns to his last witness: the ground he farmed. Commentators read these closing lines two ways. They are a clean record — and the high point of a self-defence God must still answer.
Job's chain of "if" statements closes a long answer to his friends' accusations.
After these sorrowful complaints, Job closed his long speech, as we see in Job 31. He ended with a series of solemn declarations that almost amount to oaths. His friends had accused him of definite sins and wrongdoing. As to these things his conscience was clear, though, as we have seen, he admitted he was not pure in the sight of God. So he strongly affirmed that he had not done the kinds of evil they alleged or hinted at.
Job's oath names a definite crime, and one writer links it to Ahab — the king who seized a neighbour's vineyard and had the owner killed.
The conclusion seems almost tame, for after appealing to God and to man, Job comes down to the lifeless earth. He calls on his land to testify whether he gained it unjustly, or used its yield as his own when it belonged to another. If he has taken property from another — as Ahab took the vineyard and the life of Naboth — let the very furrows weep out their charge. Let the fertile soil yield thistles instead of wheat, and weeds instead of barley.
Behind the picture lies a grim idea: ground that soaks up a wrong does not stay quiet.
No violence or fraud lay within. Not a field could cry out against Job, and its furrows could not weep together — as the ground did where Abel fell. Since then, many a piece of ground has testified against kings and queens, down to the lowest of men, all through this world's sad history. But he asks for this. If any wrong had stained his life, even in dealings like these, let thorns and weeds curse his labour. Let them spring up instead of the wheat or barley he had sown.
Writers do not doubt that Job is telling the truth. The problem is what he has become while proving it.
We cannot question the truth and sincerity of all that he says. But we may well ask: is his conclusion a happy one even for himself? He shuts the mouths of his friends. He seems more than satisfied with himself. Suppose God were to let it rest there. Is the sight of a completely self-vindicated man a pleasant one? Divine truth, as well as divine love, will not let him wrap himself in these rags of self-righteousness.
Another writer listens to the word that repeats through Job's whole defence.
Now just read chapters 29–31, and you will say that if any man could have justified himself by good works, Job was the man. As to his kindness to the poor, he was the very opposite of the lying charges brought against him. So he lets memory recount every good act of his life, and it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I — I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
Job stops speaking, but his case is not settled.
The friends were completely wrong, unjustifiable and unkind. What Job says was true, but he does not yet know all the truth about himself. No one could learn that truth from God until Christ came. He is the Truth, and He proved it in grace to the fullest at His cross. But Job was occupied and satisfied with himself. From this God would deliver him, and bless him more than ever. No flesh shall glory in His presence, and Job must learn this — to glory only in Him. We shall see later how he was taught it, humbly and graciously. But Job ended his words before that lesson had even begun.
One writer sets Job's demand beside a coming day when creation will sing for someone else.
He had called on earth and on man, yes, on God, to declare his righteousness. He would have them all unite to sing his praise! How different from that happy time when all nature will speak out the praises of the Lord, the King: "let the field exult, and everything in it! Then shall all the trees of the forest sing for joy before the LORD, for he comes to judge the earth" (Psalm 96:12–13).
- Oath. Job's closing "if" clauses are near-oaths; he invites a curse on his own crops if he ever took land by fraud or force.
- Witness. He calls the soil itself to the stand — furrows that weep, like the ground that cried out where Abel fell.
- True. Commentators do not dispute his claim. On these charges his conscience was clear.
- Yet. A wholly self-vindicated man is not a pleasant sight; "I did this, I did not do that" gives his troubled spirit no rest.
- Unfinished. He wanted all creation to sing his praise. His words end there — before God had even begun teaching him to glory only in Him.
If I have eaten the fruits thereof without money, and have tormented to death the souls of its owners
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Let thistles grow instead of wheat, and tares instead of barley. The words of Job are ended.
Job ends his long self-defence in a strange place. Not with an appeal to people, or even to God, but to the soil he farmed. Then the narrator adds one flat line: his words are ended. Why does he end here, and what does it mean that a man can run out of words while still being sure he is right?
Job has already appealed to God and to people. Now he turns to the last witness left: the ground he worked.
The conclusion seems almost tame. After the appeal to God and man, Job comes down to the lifeless earth. He appeals to his land to bear witness if he has acquired it unjustly, or used its yield as his own when it belonged to another. If he has taken property from another — as Ahab took the vineyard and the life of Naboth — then let the very furrows weep out their charge. Let the fertile soil yield thistles instead of wheat, tares instead of barley.
The idea of soil that speaks is not Job's invention. Land has told on its owners before.
No violence or fraud lay within. Not a field could cry against Job, nor its furrows weep together, as the ground did where Abel fell. Many a plot of land has since testified against kings and queens, down to the lowest of men, throughout this world's sad history.
This is an oath with teeth. Job is not just denying the charge. He is inviting ruin on his own fields if the denial is false. (Older translations say "thistles" and "cockle" where the ESV has "thorns" and "foul weeds.")
Looking back over all these things, Job felt he could call down a curse on himself if he had not kept them. The curse was this: that on his land thistles might "grow instead of wheat, and cockle [tares] instead of barley." With this Job also fell silent.
Which weed did Job mean? The word itself is not certain.
Job asked that if he had done wrong, cockle might grow instead of barley. The margin reads "noisome weeds." Some think darnel is meant, as in Matthew 13:25.
The oath caps a long record of good deeds. Job can list them all and still find no peace.
He lets memory recount every good act of his life, but it all fails to give rest to his troubled spirit. I, I, I, I did this, I did not do that. But it is all of no use.
What made this wrong was not that the facts were false. It was that Job was full of himself, and God meant to free him from that.
The friends were completely wrong, without excuse, and unkind. What Job says was true, but he does not yet know all the truth about himself... But Job was occupied and satisfied with himself. From this God would deliver him, and bless him more than ever. No flesh shall glory in His presence; and this Job must learn — to glory only in Him. We shall see later how he was taught it, humbly and graciously. But Job ended his words before it was even begun.
Job stops talking, but he has not yet met God. Ridout hears his whole closing appeal as a call for applause.
"The words of Job are ended." He had called upon earth and man, yes, upon God, to declare his righteousness. He would have them all unite to sing his praise! How different from that happy time when all nature will speak out the praises of the Lord, the King.
Nor does the line mean the conversation is over. Job stops talking, and God has not yet started.
"So these three men ceased to answer Job, because he was righteous in his own eyes." That was their idea, and there was some truth in it... "Against Job his anger was kindled, because he justified himself rather than God." That was true. He did justify himself. The chapter we have just read is self-justification from beginning to end.
This is a pause, not a full stop.
"The words of Job are ended." Not so, Job — you will speak again, and though your words may be few, they will be full of meaning.
That later silence is of a different kind altogether.
How was Job's mouth stopped? Through long chapters in his book he argues out his own righteousness. He boasted that he was eyes to the blind, feet to the lame, a father to the poor... And it was no idle boast. At last he comes into God's presence and says, "Behold, I am vile; what shall I answer You? I will lay my hand on my mouth." In God's presence his mouth is stopped.
- Witness — Job calls his last and lowest witness: the land itself. Its furrows would weep against a man who stole their fruit, as the ground did where Abel fell.
- Wager — He stakes his harvest on his innocence, asking that weeds replace wheat and barley if he lied. The claim was true; the facts were on his side.
- Wall — True facts became a wall of self: "I did this, I did not do that." Job was satisfied with himself. God set out to remove that satisfaction, not to catch him in a lie.
- Wrong silence — His words end in self-praise. He called on earth, on people, even on God, to declare him right.
- Right silence — The second silence is the real one: hand over mouth in God's presence. Job's words truly end when he stops praising himself and praises the One who deserves it.