Yea, then shalt thou delight thyself in the Almighty, and shalt lift up thy face unto +God
Eliphaz has just accused Job of hidden crimes. Now he turns to promise. Repent, he says, and Job will find his joy in God and lift his face to Him without shame. The words are beautiful. But the man speaking them has misread everything.
This verse opens the closing part of Eliphaz's speech. One writer traces its shape, and points out the price attached to the promise.
Samuel RidoutEliphaz now reaches his closing appeal, picturing the joys that await Job if he will only — admit that his false accusers are right! Then he will enjoy fellowship with the Almighty, standing in the sunlight of His face. His prayer will get its answer, and God will accept the vows he made while suffering. He will make plans that nothing will frustrate, and light will fall on all his paths.
Taken on its own, the picture Eliphaz paints is a fine one. Lifting up your face to God, here, means praying with confidence that He hears.
Leslie M. GrantNow Eliphaz paints a lovely picture of what lies ahead for the godly man, as an incentive to make Job repent. It is wonderful to have "delight in the Almighty" and to lift up one's face to God — to pray to Him with real confidence that He will hear.
The word "then" points back to what Eliphaz has just said — that the Almighty Himself would become Job's gold and silver. Delight grows out of having God as your wealth. One writer doubts that Eliphaz had tasted it.
Leslie M. GrantHe adds that "the Almighty will be your gold and your precious silver" (v.25). This reminds us of the words of the Lord to Abram, "Fear not, Abram, I am your shield; your reward shall be very great" (Gen. 15:1). But it does not seem likely that Eliphaz himself was enjoying the blessing of knowing God Himself as his own true wealth. If he had been, he would not have misrepresented God so badly.
Eliphaz ties this promise to a repentance Job did not owe. That one wrong principle drains the worth out of everything else he says.
Samuel RidoutHe has tried to make his case, mixing promises with condemnations. At times he seems to be predicting Job's recovery, but his wrong principle spoils it all, so in itself it is worthless. And yet there are many noble and beautiful sayings here. How important it is, then, to have the true point of view, so that what we open our mouth to say may be right.
Behind the mistake lay a simple reading: Job suffers, so Job must have left God. The lesson another writer draws is blunt.
Leslie M. GrantJob's suffering was proof to Eliphaz that Job had departed from God... Job had not left the Almighty, so telling him to return was insulting. Let us never treat a suffering believer as an unbeliever.
Eliphaz dangles delight in God as a reward. It was already what Job ached for. Eliphaz also promised him gold, while Job expected to come out of the testing as gold himself.
William KellyFrom beginning to end they spoke as judges, and that spirit is always wrong... Job could not enjoy God, because he did not yet hold the key to his distress from His hand. He wanted God, and he was miserable at being far from Him in practice, with all these troubles coming in between and hiding His goodness from his soul. "When he has tried me, I shall come out as gold." He did not know how such testing could serve God's glory or his own blessing. But he was sure of one thing: no one could rightly charge him with hypocrisy.
The end of the book proves Eliphaz's words true and his reasoning wrong. He said more than he knew.
William Kelly"If you return to the Almighty, you will be built up." And so it was. Little did he know that this return was about to become plain for all to see, to the shame of the friends. "Then you will lay up gold as dust, and light will shine on your ways." And so it did, in the most wonderful way.
- The prize — Delight in God and a face lifted to Him: real joy, real confidence, prayer that expects an answer.
- The source — This delight rests on having God Himself as your treasure, not on getting back what you lost.
- The flaw — Eliphaz sells that delight as payment for a repentance Job did not owe. One wrong principle ruins all his fine words.
- The warning — Suffering is not proof that someone has left God. Never treat a suffering believer as an unbeliever.
- The outcome — Job longed for God and could not reach Him. In the end light shone on his ways: the promise came true, but not on Eliphaz's terms.
Thou shalt make thy prayer unto him, and he will hear thee, and thou shalt pay thy vows;
Eliphaz closes his final speech with a picture of the life he says Job could have. Job would be at ease with God, his prayers heard and his promises to God kept. The words are lovely. But Eliphaz attaches a price: Job must first admit his accusers were right.
This line is not a stray promise. It comes at the end of a long speech. One writer maps that speech out:
Samuel RidoutThis may be divided into seven parts, a complete summing up from his point of view of the entire argument: (1) Job's sin in view of God's greatness (Job 22:1-5). (2) The direct charge (vv. 6-11). (3) All is known to God (vv. 12-14). (4) The way of the wicked (vv. 15-18). (5) Their just punishment (vv. 19, 20). (6) Final call to repentance (vv. 21-25). (7) Prophecy of a bright future (vv. 26-30).
Answered prayer is only one link in the chain Eliphaz holds out. The same writer lists the rest, and names the price attached:
Samuel RidoutEliphaz now reaches his high point, picturing the joys that await Job if he will only — acknowledge that his false accusers are right! Then he will enjoy fellowship with the Almighty, basking in the sunlight of His face. Prayer will receive its answer, and the vows he has made in his affliction will be accepted. He shall make plans that will not be frustrated, and the light will fall on all his paths.
Prayer was not Job's problem. That is why the advice misses. The counsel is sound in itself, but it treats a sufferer as a rebel:
William KellyThis seemed to Eliphaz to be needed and wise advice, no doubt, and in many a case it would fit well. But it was completely out of place for Job. To Job, gold or silver were like the dust on a balance, and the favour of God was everything... Hidden sin was not the question, nor therefore repentance of it, but a deep submission to God's will... There was no lack of practical righteousness in Job's ways, nor did his failure lie in neglecting kindness to others, or even prayer to God. But was he nothing in his own eyes?
Another writer puts the warning bluntly:
Leslie M. GrantJob had not left the Almighty, so telling him to return was insulting (vv. 22-23). Let us never treat a suffering believer as an unbeliever.
Accepting Eliphaz's terms would have cost Job the truth. To take the blessing he would first have to sign the lie:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinWhile the exhortations are all proper, they are completely out of place with Job. For if Job acted on this advice and repented as Eliphaz demanded, he would be agreeing with the false and lying accusations of his three friends. He would be admitting he was the wicked man they had made him out to be. What he says about restoration is almost prophetic of what would come to Job in blessing at the close of his trial.
The promise of answered prayer did come true. The man who spoke it ended up on the receiving end of it:
William KellyIt is remarkable, however, that the close of Eliphaz's speech was still to be proved true before the book ends. It came true in the power of Job's prayer for Eliphaz himself.
And the turning point was not a bargain struck, but a heart moved:
William KellyHe did not merely turn their punishment away when Job prayed. He turned Job's own captivity when his heart went out on their behalf... His heart was active in grace. He had seen grace, and now he showed grace — and this for the very people who had wounded him most.
The second half of the verse assumes a man who makes promises to God and keeps them. One writer notes what has changed for believers since:
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz adds also, "You will pay your vows." If Job had made vows, he had likely paid them. Today, though, the Lord Jesus tells believers not to make vows at all (Matt. 5:33-37).
- Placement — This verse sits in Eliphaz's "prophecy of a bright future." It is the reward he dangles after his final call to repentance.
- Price — Eliphaz set one condition: Job must agree his accusers were right. That meant confessing to a wickedness that was never there.
- Misdiagnosis — Job's failure was not neglected prayer or unkindness. The real question was whether he was nothing in his own eyes.
- Warning — Never treat a suffering believer as an unbeliever. Telling a man to return when he never left is an insult, not comfort.
- Fulfilment — The promise came true by grace, not by bargain. Job prayed for the friends who had wounded him most, and God turned his own captivity.
And thou shalt decree a thing, and it shall be established unto thee; and light shall shine upon thy ways.
Job 22:28 is the high point of Eliphaz's final appeal to Job — a picture of a man whose word carries weight and whose road is lit. Commentators weigh it carefully, because of who says it and who hears it.
The line is not God's promise to Job. It is the closing appeal of a friend who has just accused Job of serious sin. Commentators say this difference changes how we read every line in these speeches.
William KellyWe must remember that the Book of Job is inspired, but the speeches inside it are not. It would be a big mistake to think they are. Satan's words were not inspired, yet the book records them too. Part of the value of the book is that it shows us where the speakers went wrong. Every one of the three friends was badly mistaken in what he said, and so was Job.
The record is exact; the theology inside it is not always sound.
Leslie M. GrantThis does not mean that Job's words, or those of his three friends, were a revelation from God. It means God reported exactly what they said, even when they were wrong. At other times their words were right, but they applied the truth wrongly.
Verse 28 does not stand alone. It hangs on an "if." Eliphaz is offering a bargain: repent, and this will follow. Eliphaz read Job's suffering as proof that Job had walked away from God.
Leslie M. GrantHe refused to believe that Job knew God at all. So he was sure Job had to be converted before any good could come to him. At least he did not think Job's case was hopeless. But Job would have to take his advice and "return to the Almighty." … Job had never left the Almighty, so telling him to return was insulting. Let us never treat a suffering believer as an unbeliever.
The promise itself is lovely. The problem is the man it was aimed at. Job's trouble had nothing to do with hidden sin. And he valued God's favour far above the wealth Eliphaz held out to him.
William KellyNo doubt this advice seemed wise and necessary to Eliphaz, and in many a case it would fit. But it was completely out of place for Job. To him gold and silver weighed no more than dust, and God's favour was everything. The trial had no answer yet. Hidden sin was not the issue, so repenting of it was not the issue either. What was needed was deep submission to God's will. God could use the enemy to bring out the patience of the sufferer, and use his friends to expose his impatience.
There is a second trap in the offer.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe appeals themselves are all proper, but they are completely out of place with Job. If Job followed this advice and repented as Eliphaz demanded, he would be agreeing with the false and lying accusations of his three friends. He would be admitting that he was the wicked man they said he was.
Taken on their own, the words describe how a believer speaks and how a believer walks.
Leslie M. GrantWords spoken in faith will have good results, and a believer's ways will be seen to be "in the light."
The strange thing is that the picture came true — by a very different road from the one Eliphaz mapped out. Commentators note that his closing words read almost like a forecast of how the book ends.
William Kelly"If you return to the Almighty, you will be built up." And so it happened. Eliphaz had no idea that this return was about to be made openly, to the shame of him and his friends.
And when the light did shine, it came after a change in Job himself — not after a bargain kept.
F. B. HoleGod blessed Job richly. He restored his fortunes and gave him twice as much as he had before. He did this when Job had prayed for his friends — and not until then. … Yet God did not let that flood of blessing roll back over Job until Job had been deeply changed in spirit and character.
- Speaker — The book is inspired; the speeches inside it are an accurate record of men who were often wrong. Check who is talking before you claim the line.
- Condition — The promise is the payoff of an "if": repent of hidden sin. Eliphaz built it on a false reading of why Job was suffering.
- Misapplied — Good advice for someone far from God, but insulting to a believer under trial. Never treat a suffering believer as an unbeliever.
- Meaning — Words spoken in faith bear fruit. The believer's path is walked in the light.
- Fulfilment — The light did shine on Job's ways. But it came only after God changed Job deeply and Job prayed for the friends who wronged him.
When they are made low, then thou shalt say, Rise up! and he shall save him that is of downcast eyes.
Eliphaz ends his last speech to Job with a promise: God lifts up the one who is brought low. The words are true, but Eliphaz aimed them at the wrong man — and that mistake is what this verse turns on.
The verse comes at the end of a long appeal. Eliphaz paints a bright future for his suffering friend — on one condition.
Samuel RidoutEliphaz now reaches his closing appeal, picturing the joys that await Job if only he will — admit that his false accusers are right! He will make plans that are not frustrated, and light will fall on all his paths. If those paths should seem to take a downward turn (v. 29), Job will only need to say, "Arise," or "a lifting up," and all will be well. For he will be one of the humble whom God exalts.
Translations differ over the first half of this verse. The ESV has Job saying of those brought low, "It is because of pride." Older versions read the words as a call to rise up. The writers quoted here follow that older reading, and one of them puts the sense plainly.
Leslie M. GrantIf someone is cast down, yet stays confident that God will lift him up in the end, then God will save that humble person (v. 29). Eliphaz allows that a believer may be cast down, but he does not apply this to Job unless Job will take his advice to repent.
Everything Eliphaz says would help someone who had drifted from God. Job was not that man.
William KellyTo Eliphaz this seemed necessary and wise advice, and in many a case it would fit well. But it was wholly out of place for Job. To Job, gold or silver were like dust on the scales, and the favour of God was everything. There was no solution to the trial as yet. Hidden sin was not the question, and so repentance of it was not the question either. The real need was a deep submission to God's will. God could use the enemy to bring out the patience of the sufferer, and He could use his friends to lay bare his impatience. Eliphaz did not so much as touch the true question. He misjudged Job, and would have made the illness worse instead of curing it.
The offer also carried a trap.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThe exhortations Eliphaz gives are all proper in themselves, but they are completely out of place with Job. If Job acted on this advice and repented as Eliphaz demanded, he would be agreeing with the false and lying accusations of his three friends. He would be admitting he was the wicked man they had made him out to be.
Eliphaz's closing words did come true. Not for the repentant sinner he imagined, though, but for himself — through the prayers of the man he had accused.
William KellyYet the close of Eliphaz's speech was still to come true before the book ends. It came true in the power of Job's prayer for Eliphaz himself. "When they are dejected, then you will say, Lift up! And He will save the one with downcast eyes. He will deliver him that is not guiltless, and he is rescued by the cleanness of your hands."
The end of the book sorts these men along the line the verse draws.
F. B. HoleThe three friends of Job stood condemned. They had not spoken rightly. They had not humbled themselves as Job had, vindicating God and condemning themselves. They were told to go to Job, offer sacrifices, and ask him to pray for them — without doubt a deeply humbling thing for them. They had come to Job to sympathise and comfort him. But as the arguments went on, they began hurling accusations and reproaches at him, and they grew self-righteous as they did so. So, since they would not humble themselves as Job had done, God humbled them in front of everyone.
Whatever Eliphaz meant, the promise itself runs right through Scripture.
An Outline of Sound WordsThe Lord gives more grace. He resists the proud and gives grace to the humble (James 4:6). "He saves the lowly" (Job 22:29). He hears his desire (Ps. 10:17), revives his spirit (Isa. 57:15), beautifies him with salvation (Ps. 149:4), honours him (Prov. 15:33), guides him in judgment (Ps. 25:9), increases his joy (Isa. 29:19), blesses him, and gives him a sure inheritance (Matt. 5:5). None can praise grace like the humble soul.
Being brought low, then, is not the opposite of blessing but often its doorway.
J. N. DarbyThis is God's way of acting. He never honours us when we are thinking that we are anything. Great blessing has often been preceded by our deep humbling, sometimes even a humbling in the eyes of others. We were brought low, and the Lord lifted us up.
- Low — Eliphaz allows that a believer may be cast down, and promises that God saves and lifts the humble.
- Misapplied — the advice was sound in general, but wholly out of place for Job. Taking it would have meant agreeing with lies.
- Missed — Eliphaz never touched the true question. Job's need was deep submission to God's will, not repentance over hidden sin.
- Lifted — Job humbled himself, and the promise landed on him. His prayers then rescued the men who had wounded him.
- Reversed — God humbled the three who would not humble themselves. The verse works both ways: He saves the lowly and resists the proud.
[Even] him that is not innocent shall he deliver; yea, he shall be delivered by the pureness of thy hands.
Eliphaz ends his appeal to Job with a promise. A restored man will stand so well with God that God rescues others through him. The words came true — but not for the man Eliphaz had in mind. The old English wording, "the island of the innocent," has confused readers for centuries.
The strange phrase in older versions comes from one Hebrew word that can be read two ways. Commentators point to a familiar name to settle it:
William KellyThere is a very old mistake in this verse. That word "island" is all wrong. The same Hebrew word means "island" and also "not." Take the name "Ichabod." There the "I" is used as an adverb meaning "not," for "Ichabod" means "not glory," or "the glory is departed." That is the word here. Translate it as a negative and you get the true sense — "him that is not innocent." "Island" only makes nonsense. No one has ever explained the old Authorised Version reading, and it is astonishing that it remains. Man lost his innocence and has never recovered it. Man gains holiness by the faith of Christ, but no recovery of innocence; that could not be.
The oldest translations never had an island in the verse at all:
William KellyThere is no "island" expressed in either the Septuagint or the Vulgate, which removes one difficulty. But Schultens seems to have been the first to see that the word translated "island" is a negative, as in the name Ichabod.
Read this way, the verse reaches further than a promise for good people in trouble. One writer catches the force of that word "even":
William KellyHe will even deliver — not the humble only, but the faulty.
Eliphaz built his whole appeal on a wrong diagnosis. He assumed hidden sin, and so his warm ending landed on the wrong problem:
William KellyThis seemed wise advice to Eliphaz, and in many a case it would fit well. But it was completely out of place for Job. To him gold and silver weighed no more than dust, and the favour of God was everything. Hidden sin was not the question, nor repentance for it. The question was a deep submission to God's will. God could use the enemy to bring out the patience of the sufferer, and use his friends to lay bare his impatience. Eliphaz did not so much as touch the true question. He misjudged Job, and would have made the illness worse instead of curing it.
Eliphaz also had a role in mind for himself:
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz allows that a believer may be brought low, but he does not apply this to Job unless Job takes his advice to repent. If Job does repent, he tells him, he will be able to help others... In fact, Eliphaz was trying to do this very thing for Job. He thought the purity of his own hands would deliver Job, if only Job would repent.
The book itself supplies the answer to "who is not innocent?" — and it is not Job:
William KellyThey were the people who were "not guiltless"; they were guilty, they were "not innocent."… That came true in Job's three friends, little as Eliphaz expected it. God treated them as guilty towards their dear brother, whom they had so misjudged. They had accused him of all kinds of hidden evil, and made him out to be a hypocrite as well as a bad man. And Eliphaz here unconsciously utters words that came true.
So the clean hands in the second half of the verse are the hands of the man they had been accusing:
William Kelly"He shall deliver him that is not innocent," or "not guiltless" — that is the proper word — "and he shall be delivered by the pureness of your hands." God forced these three men to feel it: Job was more righteous than they were, and his hands were cleaner than theirs. They had dirtied their own hands by attacking Job so shamefully and so violently. They owed it to Job that God spared their lives.
At the end of the book God enforces exactly that:
William KellyThey had to come to Him with a sacrifice, through the very man they had so badly misjudged… And His servant Job, whose prayers they had despised, would pray for them, so that God would not blot them out of the book of the living… Meanwhile favour and blessing crowned Job more than ever, and the Lord restored his fortunes when he prayed for his friends.
- Not "island." The old reading rests on one Hebrew word that is really a negative — the word behind the name Ichabod, "not glory."
- Not innocent. There is no isle of innocent people. Man lost his innocence and never got it back. Faith brings holiness, not a return to innocence.
- Not excluded. Read this way, the promise covers the guilty as well as the humble. God delivers the one who is not guiltless.
- Not Job. The guilty men turned out to be the three friends who accused him. They dirtied their own hands by the way they treated Job.
- Not themselves. Job's clean hands and Job's prayer rescued them — and blessing crowned Job more than ever once he prayed for them.