Lo, I know your thoughts, and the devices ye wrongfully imagine against me.
Job has just argued that the wicked often live long, prosper, and die in peace — the opposite of what his three friends keep insisting. Now he turns from the argument to the men making it, and names the accusation hidden behind their speeches.
Job's friends never called him a guilty man outright. He heard it in their words anyway:
F. B. HoleHe fully realised the force of their words. They implied that he must have been guilty of terrible unrighteousness and sin. Yet all the time he looked like a deeply godly man.
What Job calls their "schemes" had a purpose, and here he says it out loud for them:
Samuel RidoutHe now declares their purpose, which up to this point they had only hinted at — that Job was proof of how sound their argument was. And look, they say, at what has become of him! He throws their insinuations back with a bold question. Have they not learned from observers everywhere that the wicked man is "spared" in the day of calamity — "to the day of destruction"? (Older translations say "reserved" here.) He is so powerful that nobody dares charge him with his sin, or give him the punishment he deserves. Sadly, all of this is only too common in our own day.
Job says their schemes wrong him. One writer turns that protest into a rule for our own speech:
William KellyHere you see he now comes back to their fault: the narrowness of their view. It is wrong to let people suspect evil without the slightest ground in fact for it. No, we are called to live what we know; we are called to speak when we do know; but where we do not know, we look to God.
The same writer sums up the false principle that produced the suspicion:
William KellyThese friends all treated the present time as adequate proof of what God thought about men. If He thinks we are walking well, we flourish. If we come into trouble, it is because we are bad people. That was their theory, an utterly wrong and corrupt theory.
Job does not deny that the wicked will be dealt with. He denies that the account is settled yet. Their mistake was one of timing:
William KellyThe friends put God's reckoning too early. Sadly, they were blind. They watched the present, like the Christian world, instead of waiting, like Job, for the resurrection and the kingdom. In this world the blow may fall on the man's children, not on the man himself. Job looks on to the judgment, when the evil-doer must suffer. So let no one misjudge God's ways. Let no one draw unfounded conclusions from the way He rules the world now. Look at these two men, each with a full cup, one of happiness, the other of misery; both lying dead together. Appearances prove nothing except the haste and folly of those who judge before the time. Such were their thoughts and plots to the wrong of himself.
One writer names the suspicion that drove every speech they made:
Samuel RidoutUnderlying all that the friends said was a wretched suspicion, growing into a certainty, that Job is a hypocrite. For this they had not the slightest proof, but everything to the contrary. Their theory forced them to it. For the sake of that theory they trample underfoot all natural and gracious affection. Nothing wounds an honest, loving man like suspicions with no ground, and the charges that grow out of them.
One writer applies this to the way we read other people's misfortunes today:
Samuel RidoutBut even now, is not suspicion of others all too common? One person fails in business, has illness in his family, or loses loved ones. People jump to the conclusion that God is chastening him for some imagined faults. How cruel this is! It goes against the plain direction: "Only on the evidence of two witnesses or of three shall a charge be established." Let us be slow to suspect. Let us be slower still to charge unknown evil, and leave that to the Searcher of hearts. If He calls on us to name evil, it is evil He has unmistakably brought to light.
- Thought. Job's friends never accused him openly. He still heard it in every speech: his godliness was a front for serious sin.
- Scheme. The thought became a plan. Job would be the living proof of their theory, and he says so out loud before they can.
- Wrong. What made it wrong was the absence of evidence. We may speak about what we know; where we do not know, we look to God.
- Theory. Their whole system read a man's present circumstances as God's verdict on him. Success meant approval; trouble meant guilt. One writer calls that theory utterly wrong.
- Timing. Job's answer is not that the wicked escape. The reckoning is still ahead, so appearances prove nothing. Be slow to suspect, and slower still to charge evil you cannot prove.
For ye say, Where is the house of the noble? and where the tent of the dwellings of the wicked?
Near the end of his long reply, Job quotes his friends' own question back at them. It sounds like a general remark about evil men, but Job hears an accusation aimed at himself.
The friends never name Job in the question. One commentator reads it as a verdict on the ruined man in front of them.
Leslie M. GrantJob strongly takes the offensive in this section. He sees the schemes by which his friends would wrong him (v.27). For they asked, "Where is the house of the prince?" They meant that a man of noble character would never sink into the misery Job was bearing (v.28). They thought the dwelling place of the wicked matched Job's circumstances.
Another writer notes that until now the friends had only hinted at this, and Job drags the hint into the open:
Samuel RidoutHe now states their purpose, which they have only hinted at so far. Job was an example proving their argument sound. And see, they say, what has become of him!
The question only works if a man's circumstances now show where he stands with God. That is what the friends believed.
J. N. DarbyThey press the doctrine that God's rule on earth is a full measure and display of His righteousness, and of the righteousness of man, which would match it. That doctrine proves total ignorance of what God's righteousness is, and of His ways. It also proves the absence of all real knowledge of what God is, or man as a sinner.
Just before this question, Job tells them he knows their thoughts. One writer turns that into a rule for how we speak about other people.
William KellyHere you see he now comes back to their fault. Their view is narrow, and it is wrong to let people suspect evil without the slightest ground in fact. No, we are called to live what we know; we are called to speak when we do know; but where we do not know we look to God.
The same writer puts their theory plainly:
William KellyThese friends were all looking at the present time as the adequate proof of what God thought about men. If He thinks we are walking well, we are flourishing. If we come into trouble, it is because we are bad people. That was their theory, an utterly wrong and corrupt theory.
Job's reply sends them to check the facts for themselves. How does life actually go for the wicked?
Samuel RidoutHe throws back their hints with a bold question. Have they not learned from observers everywhere that the wicked is "spared" in the day of calamity (not "reserved," as older translations have it), "to the day of destruction"? He is so powerful that no one dares charge his sin to him, or give him the punishment he deserves. All this, sadly, is only too common in our own day.
Where the friends wanted the account settled now, Job looked further ahead:
William KellyThe friends expected the reckoning too soon. They fixed their eyes (blinded, sadly) on the present, like much of the Christian world, instead of waiting, as Job did, for the resurrection and the kingdom... Look at these two men, each with a full cup, one of happiness, the other of misery; both lying dead together. Appearances prove nothing except the haste and folly of those who judge before the time.
Job ends the chapter by refusing their comfort:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinJob shows that his friends have not only failed to convince him, but their answers are insincere and nothing but falsehoods. The victory is on his side. Yet the problem remains as unsolved as before: why do the righteous suffer, and how does their suffering fit with a righteous God?
- The question — "Where is the house of the prince?" is not a riddle about houses; it is a verdict on Job, pressed without proof.
- The theory — they believed God's dealings now are a full display of His righteousness. That belief shows no real knowledge of God or of man.
- The error — if today proves what God thinks, then every trouble marks a guilty man, and every comfort an innocent one.
- The correction — the wicked man is spared now, but spared toward a day of destruction. Delay is not pardon.
- The result — the timing was wrong, so the comfort was empty and the answers false. The question of why the righteous suffer still stands.
Have ye not asked the wayfarers? and do ye not regard their tokens
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
That the wicked is reserved for the day of calamity? They are led forth to the day of wrath.
Job's friends argued that what a man gets now shows what he is. Job points to wicked men who die old and rich, and asks when their reckoning comes.
Job's three friends worked from one rule: God settles every account in this life. One writer states their position plainly, then answers it.
William KellyZophar keeps up this idea. There is a righteous God above, there are unrighteous, wicked people below, and God always deals with these wicked people now. That was not true. God has always allowed a large part of the world to seem to prosper in their evil. The reason is that the time of judgment has not yet come.
Job does not deny that God sometimes strikes the wicked down. He denies that it happens now as a rule.
Samuel RidoutThe psalmist tells us that the ungodly are "like chaff that the wind drives away" (Ps. 1:4). That is true. But Job reminds his hearers that it seldom happens in the present life. God reserves it for the "judgment."
The verse has two halves: God holds the wicked man back from calamity now, and leads him out to wrath later. One writer shows why the key word matters.
Leslie M. GrantThen Job speaks of what his friends had entirely missed, that is, the judgment of the future. "For the wicked are spared for the day of doom" (v. 30). "Spared" is the proper translation here. It shows that God now spares them trouble because of a later "day of doom." He allows them to hide from punishment now, but He will bring them out in the day of His wrath.
Job is not guessing. He points to what any traveller could confirm. The writer below quotes an older translation, which reads "reserved" for "spared" and "brought forth to the day of wrath" for "rescued in the day of wrath."
William Kelly"Have you not asked those who go by the way? and do you not know their signs, that the wicked is reserved to the day of destruction?" That is the reason why they flourish now. He grasped this great moral truth in an admirable way. "They shall be brought forth to the day of wrath." Not a question of now! These friends were all looking at the present time as enough proof of what God thought about men. In their view, if He thinks we are walking well, we are flourishing. And if we come into trouble, it is because we are bad people. That was their theory, an utterly wrong and corrupt theory.
If present ease is a sparing, the man who escapes trouble is not safe. One writer shows how ordinary this looks.
William KellyA man takes God's name in vain and swears to a downright lie — perhaps about a theft, or any other offence. Now and then, such a man drops down dead after it. Well, that is a very unusual thing. Other people swear the same lie and keep their money. They try to keep their good name too. But all the while they are heaping up wrath against the day of wrath.
Job's next question presses the point. On earth, no one is in a position to call such a man to account.
Leslie M. GrantJob then asks, "Who condemns his way to his face? and who repays him for what he has done?" Job's friends were condemning him to his face. But there is only one answer to the two questions he asks. Only God has the right to condemn. Only God will recompense man's sin.
The lesson runs both ways. If prosperity proves nothing, neither does suffering. That is where the friends went wrong about Job.
Samuel RidoutOne man dies in peace, surrounded by great prosperity. As the psalm says of the wicked, "they have no pangs until death." Another man is cut off in misery. Both alike reach the same end in the grave. Since this is so, it does not suit his friends at all to lay down a fixed rule. They said that judgment in this life was always a sign of sin in the person, and that prosperity was always a sign of righteousness.
- Spared. The wicked man's ease is not approval. God holds him back from the day of calamity and keeps him for the day of wrath.
- Delayed. What Psalm 1 says of chaff driven by the wind seldom happens in this life. God keeps it for the judgment.
- Deceptive. The friends read present circumstances as God's verdict. They were wrong twice over: about the prosperous wicked, and about suffering Job.
- Accumulating. The man who lies under oath and keeps his money and good name is not escaping. He is storing up wrath for the day of wrath.
- Deferred to God. Nobody on earth repays such a man to his face — only God has the right to condemn, and only God will recompense. So no one should read God's verdict off a man's circumstances.
Who shall declare his way to his face? and who shall repay him what he hath done?
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.