And Job answered and said,
This verse is only a line of narration. It marks the moment Job turns to answer Zophar. Everything hangs on what follows: Job is about to set the prosperity of the wicked against Zophar's arguments.
Job is answering Zophar, one of the three friends who came to comfort him. One writer sets out the shape of that reply:
Samuel RidoutIn this reply to Zophar he shows that his spirit is still unbroken. He gives a decisive answer to what only looked like arguments. Job's reply follows the shape of Zophar's speech, and falls into seven parts: (1) The solemnity of his reply, which has to do with God (Job 21:1-6). (2) The prosperity of the wicked (verses 7-16). (3) Judgment seen only in their children (verses 17-21). (4) Varied experiences of the wicked (verses 22-26). (5) He charges the friends (verses 27-31). (6) The end in death (verses 32, 33). (7) Conclusion (verse 34).
The friends have given Job no sympathy. He speaks anyway, and one commentator notes what speaking did for him:
William KellyJob now answers in chapter twenty-one. It was a great relief to the man under trial to speak out. He had failed completely to win their sympathy, but Job still chose to speak plainly, and he had no trouble answering anything they said.
Job asks for a hearing, and then says that the hearing can stand in place of comfort. Commentators read his tone differently. One hears an edge in it:
F. B. HoleOne translation of verse 2 reads, "Hear attentively my speech, and let this replace your consolations." Calling the speeches of the three friends "consolations" was of course sarcasm. What he really thought of their words is plain at the end of the next verse. There he told them that once he had spoken, they could "mock on!"
Another hears self-control, and reads the restraint as itself an argument:
Leslie M. GrantJob does not reply in the same argumentative spirit his friends had used. He appeals to them calmly to weigh what he is saying. His self-control should have impressed them enough to make them take him seriously. He asked them to bear with him in his speaking to them, and after he has had his say, to continue their mocking (vv.2-3). He had little hope that they would change their minds, no matter how solemnly he speaks.
Job has stopped looking to his friends for a verdict. One writer sees faith in that shift:
Samuel RidoutAs for himself, he says he no longer expects any fair judgment from man — and rightly so, if man were all he had to hope in. This implies he has turned to God, and that in itself shows the faith at the bottom of his heart. But his difficulties have not gone away. They have good reason to be astonished, because he himself trembles to speak of what he is about to set before them.
The friends' failure is traced to what they never did on his behalf:
Leslie M. GrantThey had good reason to keep quiet, because they were not speaking for God — the God who had allowed (or caused) his terror and trembling (v.6). If they had truly cared about Job, could they not have prayed to God about how to help this suffering man? They probably never thought of praying for him, because they were sure they had the right answers for God and needed no prayer.
Job trembles as he speaks. What frightens him is not his own losses but what he sees around him:
William KellyWhat made Job tremble so much when he saw wickedness prosper? He asks here, "Why do the wicked live?" He is saying, 'I can follow it so far. I can well understand God casting down wicked men — that is only what they deserve. But that is not the fact, for most of them appear to flourish in their wickedness for the time being.'... "Their houses are safe from fear." A robber breaks into many a godly man's house. Many a godly man's house burns down over his head. Yet there may be wicked men of the worst kind who never meet these troubles at all!
Zophar had missed something. One writer names it:
William KellyThere is not the slightest sense here of God having chastening dealings with those He loves during this time of pilgrimage. Yet this is exactly what God does.
- Answer. Job answers Zophar in a reply built in seven parts, and his spirit is still unbroken.
- Ask. He asks only for a hearing. Commentators differ on whether his request is sarcasm or calm appeal, but listening is all he still expects from them.
- Aim. He gives up expecting a fair verdict from man and turns to God. That turn shows the faith at the bottom of his heart.
- Absence. The friends had their answers ready and never prayed for Job. Being sure about God took the place of caring for him.
- Astonishment. What makes Job tremble is the pattern he sees: the wicked flourish while godly men are robbed and ruined. Zophar's tidy system had no room for it.
Hear attentively my speech, and let this replace your consolations.
Job's three friends have had their say, and now he takes his turn. He asks for one small thing: not agreement, not sympathy, just a hearing — and he says that hearing can take the place of the comfort they never gave.
Job's friends had come to console him. By the time he reaches this speech, he uses their own word back at them, and one writer reads the whole line as a jab.
F. B. HoleVerse 2 has been translated, "Hear attentively my speech, and let this replace your consolations." To sum up the speeches of the three friends as "consolations" was of course sarcasm. What he really thought of their words is plain at the end of the next verse. There he told them that after he had spoken they could "mock on!"
The request has a logic to it. If they will not give him comfort, they can at least give him their attention — and that silence would be worth more than everything they have said so far.
Samuel RidoutHe begins with a plea that at least they will listen to him. This will at least take the place of the consolation which they refuse to give him. After that they can resume their taunts. For himself, he says he has stopped expecting any right judgment from people — and no wonder, if that were all his hope. This implies that he has turned to God, which is itself a sign of the faith at the bottom of his heart.
Commentators differ on how to hear Job here. Hole finds sarcasm; another writer hears self-control, and thinks that restraint should itself have been an argument to his friends.
Leslie M. GrantJob does not reply in the same argumentative spirit his friends had used. He appeals to them to weigh what he is saying. He controlled himself, and that alone should have impressed them enough to give him some serious consideration.
Another writer marks this speech as a turning point. The sign of it is in how Job now handles the men arguing against him.
William KellyJob answers, "Keep listening to my words." From this point there seems to be a real improvement in Job... What marks the change more than a little is that from now on he grants whatever truth there was in what his friends had pressed on him. Hardly anything shows a man gaining the moral advantage over his opponents as much as this... You never bring a dispute to a good close until you admit whatever is true in the man who opposes you.
Job asks to be heard because he needs to be heard. He has given up on winning their sympathy, but he has not given up on saying what is true.
William KellyIt was a great relief to this tried man to speak out. He had failed completely to win their sympathy. Still, Job preferred to speak plainly, and he had no trouble meeting anything they had to say. "And let this be your comfort. Bear with me, and I will speak; and after I have spoken, mock on." It was harsh, but it was no more than they deserved.
The friends were not villains. They were sincere, and still no help at all.
The Bible TreasuryHis three friends were clearly sincere in their care for the sufferer, and eager to help him in his hour of sorrow. But the cause of his suffering baffled them completely... They might have helped if his had been an ordinary case. But here was a truly righteous man, stripped of every earthly possession in a way no one had ever seen, and they had nothing to say. They did not understand God's ways with His own at all. So their false and unworthy suggestions only made Job feel how useless they were to him, and threw him back on God Himself. In the end he said, "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you."
That failure leaves a warning for anyone who sits with a grieving friend. The same writer points to a better model.
The Bible TreasuryBut we are told to act as He did, Whose mission was to comfort those who mourn: "Jesus wept." We are to "weep with those who weep", and not to pretend we know too much about the mysterious causes of their suffering. It is possible we may be mistaken in our judgments.
- Asked — Job asks for one thing only: attention. He offers his friends a way to comfort him that costs them nothing but silence.
- Answered — What they gave instead was talk. Calling their speeches "consolations" was sarcasm. He expects mockery the moment he stops speaking.
- Attempted — Their failure was sincere, not malicious. Job's case was outside anything their reasoning could explain. So their comfort came out as blame.
- Adjusted — From this point Job improves. He begins to admit whatever was true in his opponents' words. Hardly anything shows a man gaining the moral advantage more.
- Abandoned to God — Job has given up on fair judgment from people. That throws him back on God Himself, and far later he can say, "now my eye sees you."
Suffer me and I will speak; and after I have spoken, mock on!
Job's friends came to comfort him and ended up accusing him. His reply opens with a request rather than an argument: hear me out first, and mock afterwards if you must.
Job asks his friends for very little here. One writer explains why.
Samuel RidoutHe begins by pleading that they will at least listen to him. That will take the place of the comfort they refuse to give him. After that they can go back to their taunts. As for himself, he says he has stopped expecting any fair judgment from man — and no wonder, if man were all his hope. This implies he has turned to God, which is itself a sign of the faith at the bottom of his heart.
Job's tone here is not gentle. So where does the sting lie?
F. B. HoleOne translation of verse 2 reads, "Listen carefully to my speech, and let this replace your consolations." To sum up the speeches of the three friends as "consolations" was of course sarcasm. How he really viewed their words is plain at the end of the next verse, when he told them that after he had spoken they might "mock on!" He felt the full force of what they said. They meant that he must have been guilty of terrible unrighteousness and sin, while all along looking like a man of great godliness.
Was Job wrong to speak like this? One writer says no, and points to what lay under the sharpness.
William KellyIt was severe, but it was no more than they deserved. Through all of this Job has a deep sense of dealing with God, and that is true godliness.
Sarcasm is not the whole of Job's reply. Notice how he handles himself.
Leslie M. GrantJob does not reply in the same argumentative spirit his friends had used. He appeals to them to weigh what he is saying. That self-control should have impressed them enough to give him a serious hearing. Yet he had little hope of changing their minds, however earnestly he spoke.
How could sincere, religious men treat a suffering friend like this? One writer traces it to their religion itself.
William KellyNo one makes stranger mistakes than godly people who are not walking in dependence on God. Their very godliness gives them a stronger hatred of evil. They need the power of God's grace to guard them, and they need to feel that need. Without that, no one will be more severe and no one less just. This is a serious warning.
So the mocking went on. Did any good come out of it?
The Bible TreasuryThey could not understand why such a perfect and upright man as Job should be tried so severely. So they sat silent for seven days. Then their hints and misrepresentations drove that patient man to cry out from the bitterness of his soul, "Miserable comforters are you all." They might have been of help in an ordinary case. But when a deeply righteous man was stripped of every earthly possession in a way no one had ever seen, they had nothing to say. They did not understand God's ways with His own people at all. Their false and unworthy suggestions only made Job feel how useless they were to him, and threw him back on God Himself. In the end he said, "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you."
- Listen. Job asks for a hearing in place of the comfort his friends refused. Attention is the least you can give a sufferer, and they withheld even that.
- Sarcasm. Calling their speeches "consolations" and inviting them to mock afterwards is a deliberate jab. Job knew they were accusing him of hidden sin behind an outward show of godliness.
- Restraint. He does not argue back. He asks them to weigh his words, and that self-control should have won him a serious hearing.
- Warning. Godly people can be the harshest of all. Hatred of evil without dependence on God's grace produces severity, not justice.
- Result. Their empty comfort threw Job back on God Himself, and that road ended in "now my eye sees you."
As for me, is my complaint to a man? or wherefore should not my spirit be impatient?
Job's friends have argued long with him about his suffering, and his answer moves the whole case away from them. His first question asks who he is really complaining to, and his second asks why he should be expected to stay patient.
Job's first question is not a denial that he is complaining. It says who he is complaining to. One commentator quotes the line in older wording. He sees real godliness in that instinct, and names the thing Job still cannot explain:
William Kelly"As for me, is my complaint to man?" In all of this he has the deep sense of having to do with God, and that is true godliness. "And if it were so, why should not my spirit be troubled?" — that is, I do not understand it; that is the thing that makes it so terrible.
Another commentator sees the start of a search here. Job turns away from his friends and looks elsewhere:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHe is not complaining to man, or making his appeal to these human friends. He begins to look for another helper, even to God.
The second half of the verse is often rendered "troubled," but the Hebrew picture is of a spirit running out. One translation of the line reads:
William KellyAs for me, is my complaint to man? And why then should not my spirit be short?
That shortness is impatience, and Job's argument is that it would be the natural response if men were the problem. Since they are not, his trouble runs deeper:
F. B. HoleHis first point is this: his complaint was not to man but to God. If it had been to man, his spirit might well have been troubled, or "impatient." He reminded them that both he and they had to do with God.
Job has stopped expecting a fair verdict from people. One commentator sees more than despair in that:
Samuel RidoutFor himself, he says he has ceased to expect any right judgment from man; and well he might, if that were all his hope. This implies that he has turned to God, which is in itself an indication of the faith at the bottom of his heart. But his difficulties have not vanished.
Commentators differ over how kindly to read Job here. One says the complaint was aimed at God's way of dealing with him. He also points to what the friends never did:
Leslie M. GrantHe asks them, "Is my complaint against man?" In fact, his complaint was against the way God was dealing with him... If it were men who were causing his suffering, he would have had plenty of reason to complain. But it was God who was dealing with him... If they had really cared about Job, could they not have prayed to God about how to help the poor sufferer? Probably they never thought of praying for him. They were sure they had the right answers for God, with no need of prayer.
Job took his trouble to God instead of trading it back and forth with men. One commentator shows how easily believers lose that habit:
Hamilton SmithGod's word allows a groan, but never a grumble... Sadly, we as believers often discuss the failures of God's people among ourselves in a bitter spirit. Then the groaning becomes mere grumbling, or complaining about what God allows in His dealings with His people. Complaining words to one another may betray a hidden spirit of rebellion against God. Or they may be an effort to lift ourselves up by belittling others. It is good for us if we escape these traps. We escape them by pouring out the anguish of our spirits, and the exercises of our souls, before the LORD.
- Address. Job's first move names the right hearer: his complaint is not to man. He has the deep sense of having to do with God, and that is true godliness.
- Impatience. If men were the cause of his pain, impatience would make sense. The hand on him is God's, and that is the thing he cannot explain.
- Turning. He has given up expecting a right verdict from people. That is not collapse: it shows he has turned to God, and it reveals the faith underneath.
- Honesty. Commentators differ in tone. Some hear faith reaching for a helper. Another says the complaint was against God's way of dealing with him — honest, but still a complaint.
- Habit. A groan is poured out before God; a grumble gets traded between people. The friends had answers but no prayer. That is the mark of talking about a sufferer instead of carrying him to God.
Mark me, and be astonished, and lay the hand upon the mouth.
Job has just heard his friends describe the short, doomed life of the wicked, and now he turns the argument around. First he asks his three friends to stop talking and look at him.
The demand for silence rests on what Job says just before it: his case is not with people.
F. B. HoleHis first point is this: his complaint was not to man but to God. If it had been to man, his spirit might well have been troubled, or "impatient." He reminded them that both he and they were dealing with God. Given that fact, and looking at how God was dealing with him, they would do well to lay their hands on their mouths and stop condemning him. As for himself, he was afraid and trembled when he remembered it.
Another writer weighs the same words and finds godliness in them, not rebellion.
William Kelly"As for me, is my complaint to man?" Through all of this he has a deep sense that he is dealing with God, and that is true piety. "And if it were so, why should not my spirit be troubled?" That is, I do not understand it, and that is what makes it so terrible.
A hand over the mouth is what you do when you have nothing to say. Job's friends had plenty to say — and that was the problem.
Leslie M. Grant"Look at me," he says, "and be appalled, and lay your hand over your mouth" (v.5). They might well keep quiet. They were not answering for God — the God who had allowed (or caused) him to be terrified and trembling (v.6). If they had really cared about Job, could they not have prayed to God about how to help the poor sufferer? They probably never thought of praying for him. They were sure they already had the right answers for God, with no need of prayer.
Job is not asking for pity here. He points to himself as a case their rule cannot explain. What he sees frightens him too.
William KellyBut with great solemnity he calls them to hear something he admits made him shudder. It is an undeniable truth, and it flatly contradicts their narrow thoughts, their clever sayings and their unkind certainty: the wicked, instead of being cut down young, live on, grow old and become great in power, with their children settled around them.
Their whole case rested on a rule about how the world works. Job's evidence breaks the rule. Why they held it in the first place is the real warning.
William KellyThey had assumed that, under God's government, no wicked man prospered and no righteous man could fail to prosper. There could not be a falser view of the world as it now is... But how did these pious men come to make such a strange mistake? No one makes stranger mistakes than pious people who are not walking in dependence on God. Their very piety gives them a stronger hatred of evil. And if they lack the power of grace and the sense of their need of grace, with God Himself guarding them, no one will be more severe and no one less just.
Job wins this round. But at the end of the book he makes the same gesture himself.
William KellyJob had wished to come near His seat, and plead his own cause. Now here He was, if Job could answer as boldly as he had rebuked. The only answer Job gives is to admit that he is vile. He had no answer to the divine challenge beyond the confession implied in laying his hand on his mouth... The folly of refusing to submit is now before his soul. He had spoken too much; silence was what suited him. It was for Jehovah to speak.
- Silence asked. Job asks his friends to stop speaking and look at him.
- Silence justified. They were not answering for God, and they never prayed for the man they were diagnosing.
- Silence earned. The evidence is plain: the wicked often grow old, powerful and secure — a fact that made even Job shudder.
- Silence needed. Piety without dependence on God turns harsh and unfair. No one judges worse than religious people who are sure they are right.
- Silence received. In the end Job lays his own hand on his mouth. When God speaks, it is for God alone to speak.
Even when I think [thereon], I am affrighted, and trembling taketh hold of my flesh.
Zophar has just argued that no wicked man prospers. Job turns to his three friends and asks them to look at him and stay quiet. First he warns them that what he is about to say frightens him. Remembering what he has seen makes his body shake.
Job opens by explaining who he is really arguing with. One writer sees Job's plain speaking, and his sense of dealing with God, as true piety:
William KellyIt was a great relief to the tried man to speak out. He had failed completely to win their sympathy. Still Job preferred to speak plainly, and had no trouble meeting anything they had to say... "As for me, is my complaint against man?" While all this was going on he has the deep sense of having to do with God, and that is true piety. "And if it were so, why should not my spirit be troubled?" (ESV: "Why should I not be impatient?") — that is, I do not understand it; that is what makes it so terrible.
His fear comes from the case he is about to make, and from what it does to Zophar's argument:
Samuel RidoutHis difficulties have not vanished. They may well be astonished, for he himself trembles to speak of what he is now going to lay before them. What he will say disproves much of what Zophar had just set out so well.
Job's shudder has a cause, and the next verses name it:
William KellyNow what made Job tremble so when he saw wickedness prosper?... He says, "I can understand it so far. I can fully understand God casting down wicked men — it is only what they deserve. But that is not the fact. Most of them seem to flourish in their wickedness for the time."... A robber breaks into many a godly man's house. Many a godly man's house burns over his head. And here might be wicked men of the worst character, who do not come into these troubles at all!
Job asks them to cover their mouths. One commentator reads this as a rebuke of speech that ran ahead of prayer:
Leslie M. Grant"Look at me," he says, "and be appalled, and lay your hand over your mouth." They might well keep quiet. They were not answering for God — the God who had allowed (or caused) his terror and trembling. If they truly cared for Job, could they not have prayed to God about how to help the poor sufferer? Probably they never thought of praying for him. They felt sure they already had the right answers for God, with no need of prayer.
Their whole case rested on a rule the world does not follow. The mistake carries a warning:
William KellyThey had assumed that, under God's government, no wicked man prospered, and no righteous man could fail to prosper. No view of the world as it now is could be falser... But how did these godly men come to make such a strange mistake? There are none who make stranger mistakes than the godly when they are not walking in dependence on God. Their very godliness gives them a stronger hatred of evil. But if the power of grace is missing, and the sense of their own need of God's grace guarding them, none will be more severe, and none less just.
Job raises the question; he cannot close it. One writer points to a later psalm for the missing piece:
Leslie M. GrantThe wicked know nothing of the painful experiences Job had. They live their whole life without them, then die without suffering. Asaph observed this also, as he records in Psalm 73:3-9. He added in verses 16-17, "But when I thought how to understand this, it seemed to me a wearisome task, until I went into the sanctuary of God; then I discerned their end." He learned that God's accounts are not settled in this life: there is a future to be considered.
- Look. Job asks his friends to stop talking and look at him. One suffering righteous man breaks their rule.
- Tremble. What he remembers frightens him. The wicked really do prosper, and saying so out loud pulls down Zophar's argument.
- Address. His complaint is not with men but with God. That deep sense of dealing with God is true piety.
- Fail. The friends' rule said the wicked always suffer and the upright always prosper. No view of the world is falser. Godly people who stop depending on God make the strangest mistakes of all.
- Wait. Asaph later answered the question Job could not. God does not settle His accounts in this life. Asaph saw the end of the wicked only after going into God's sanctuary.