And Job answered and said,
Eliphaz has just finished speaking, and this verse marks Job's turn to answer. What follows is one of the sharpest verdicts in the Bible on comfort that misses its mark.
Eliphaz had dressed his speech up as kindness from God, and it is that claim Job hands back.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz had claimed to be giving Job "the consolations of God." This moves Job to a bitter reply: "Miserable comforters are you all!" (v.2). Instead of comfort, they had given heartless accusations, which Job terms "words of wind." He says that if they were in his place, he could heap up words against them in the same cruel way. But he would not do that. He would use his words to strengthen and encourage them, and so give them some relief. He longed for this himself, but they had nothing for him.
Underneath their speeches lay one message, repeated in different shapes.
F. B. HoleHis friends had been repeating the same basic idea in different ways: the disasters that had overwhelmed him could have only one explanation. He must have been a hypocrite, with evil hidden under his religious exterior. If this was the comfort they had to offer him, it was of a very miserable kind.
They did not know the God they spoke for, and they did not know what sin is.
J. N. DarbyThey had no true grasp of God's character, and so they could not understand His dealings with a soul. They had no proper sense of sin. So they did not know that if God blesses man, it must be entirely on the ground of grace. They did not know how to meet his case. They had said many true things, yet not one right thing that fit Job, because they did not understand him.
Their pressure fixed Job's eyes on himself. Even then, he still turned to God with his tears.
The Bible TreasuryThey turned him in the wrong direction; they engaged him with himself. He could not deny that he was afflicted. Measuring himself against other men, he could not see that he had done anything to bring such great affliction on himself. And his friends harassed him, holding his mind to this one point: that God's doings match man's acts, and so, since he suffered this much, he must have been wicked in an extraordinary degree. Job resists (Job 16) and calls his friends "miserable comforters" — and so they were... "My friends scorn me," he exclaims, "my eye pours out tears to God."
Their failure did one thing they never intended: it left Job with nowhere to go but God.
The Bible TreasuryAll human efforts to comfort, apart from God and the truth, fall short, because they are more or less ignorant. And the harder the trial, the plainer that failure becomes... They did not understand the ways of God with His own at all. By their false and unworthy suggestions, they made Job feel how completely unable they were to help him, and they threw him back on God Himself. So in the end he said, "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you" (Job 42:5).
Later a man named Elihu speaks, and Job can listen — though Elihu humbles him more than his friends ever did.
James BoydThe words of his friends irritated him; he found neither wisdom nor comfort in them. But he could listen to Elihu. There was healing balm in his words... No one showed him his vileness as Elihu did. Yet the words that laid him low as a naked sinner before God were the only words he had the patience to listen to.
The men Job answered here are the same men he later carries to God in prayer.
C. H. MackintoshSo when Job got right with God and with himself, he soon got right with his friends, for he learned to pray for them. Yes, he could pray for the "miserable comforters," the "physicians of no value" — the very men he had argued with so long, so stubbornly, and so fiercely! "And the LORD restored the fortunes of Job, when he had prayed for his friends."
- Claim. Eliphaz called his speech the consolations of God. Job calls the speakers miserable comforters and their words wind.
- Collapse. Their comfort was miserable because it had only one idea: his disasters must prove hidden sin.
- Cause. They had no true grasp of God's character and no proper sense of sin. So they said many true things and not one right thing for Job.
- Cure. Their emptiness threw him back on God Himself. Later he could listen to Elihu, whose words laid him low and brought healing.
- Close. When Job was right with God and himself, he prayed for these same men — and the Lord restored him as he prayed.
I have heard many such things grievous comforters are ye all.
Job has just listened to Eliphaz speak again, and he heard nothing new. He answers by calling the three friends who came to sit with him miserable comforters. How did sincere men end up making his pain worse?
Eliphaz had presented his speeches as messages from God. Job hands back a very different verdict on them.
Samuel RidoutEliphaz had called their speeches to Job "the consolations of God" — at least the part that promised restoration if he repented. Job calls them "miserable comforters." Is there to be no end of windy words? Had the friends not used up their stock of accusations? What stirs Eliphaz up to speak further, with nothing new to say? Job could easily treat them the same way if he were in their place. Instead, he would have tried to give real comfort.
The Hebrew behind the familiar wording is sharper than "miserable comforters" suggests. One rendering of the opening lines runs:
William KellyI have heard many such things, / And comforters of distress are you all. / Are windy words at an end? / Or what vexes you that you answer?
It would be easy to read these friends as cold or uncaring. The story of how they came says otherwise.
J. G. BellettEliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar were real friends, though they proved to be only "miserable comforters." They came to Job when everyone else had deserted him — children mocking him, young men pushing away his feet, his relatives failing him, his close friends forgetting him, his servants giving him no answer, and his wife refusing him, though he begged her for their children's sake. They were true-hearted friends, who said they would go and comfort their afflicted brother. And they did go; and they sat with him in his place of ashes and broken pottery for seven days.
So the failure was not in their love. It was in what they knew of God — and in true words aimed at the wrong man.
J. N. DarbyAnd what had his friends done for him during the sifting he was passing through? He had good reason to say, "Miserable comforters are you all." They had no true grasp of God's character. So they could not understand His dealings with a soul. They had no proper sense of sin. So they did not know this: if God is going to bless man at all, it must be entirely on the ground of grace. They did not know how to meet his case. They had said many true things. But they had not said one single right thing that applied to Job, because they did not understand him.
The harder the trial, the more clearly poor comfort shows itself. Their words could have carried an ordinary sorrow. This one they could not carry.
The Bible TreasuryAll purely human efforts to comfort, apart from God and the truth, are useless, because they are more or less ignorant. And the more bitter the trial, the more obvious that failure becomes... They might have helped if his had been an ordinary case. But here was a deeply righteous man, stripped of every earthly possession in a way no one had ever seen. Their tongues were dumb. They did not understand God's ways with His own people at all. By their false and unworthy suggestions, they made Job feel how unable they were to help him. So they threw him back on God Himself. So that eventually he said, "I have heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you" (Job 42:5).
Job does not stop at the complaint. He also says what he would have done in their place.
William KellyAnd no doubt Job spoke the simple truth. He would have been a comforter of sorrow. He would not have been a doctor without any medicine. They brought poison into his wounds instead of something to soothe them. He said, "I have been pouring out my sorrow, but I am no better for it."
The quarrel is not the last word. Something changed in Job, and it changed how he treated these men.
C. H. MackintoshSo we find that when Job got right about God and himself, he soon got right about his friends. He learned to pray for them. Yes, he could pray for the "miserable comforters," the "physicians of no value" — the very men he had argued with so long, so strongly, and so fiercely! "And the LORD restored the fortunes of Job, when he had prayed for his friends."
- Nothing new — Eliphaz called his speeches the consolations of God. Job had heard it all before and called them windy words.
- Real love — the failure was not coldness. These men came when everyone else had gone, and sat seven days in the ashes with him.
- Wrong God — they had no true grasp of God's character or of grace. So they said many true things, but not one right thing for Job.
- Empty in a storm — comfort apart from God and the truth fails when the trial is deepest. That emptiness drove Job back on God Himself.
- Prayer at the end — once right with God, Job prayed for the very men he had called miserable comforters, and the LORD restored his fortunes.
Shall words of wind have an end? or what provoketh thee that thou answerest?
Eliphaz has just finished his second speech and called his advice "the consolations of God." Job has now heard the same charge from three men, and he asks whether such words ever come to an end.
Job's complaint is not that his friends said nothing. It is that their words carried no substance and nothing new. One writer sets Job's verdict against the claim Eliphaz had made for himself:
Samuel RidoutEliphaz had called their speeches to Job "the consolations of God" — meaning, no doubt, the part that promised restoration if he repented. Job describes them as "miserable comforters." Is there to be no end of windy words? Had the friends not exhausted their stock of accusations? What stirs up Eliphaz to speak further, with nothing new to say?
The second half of the verse asks about motive, not content. Job wants to know what drives Eliphaz to keep going. One writer hears in the question a plea for a different tone:
William KellyJob proved patient, but he does not spare his stubborn friends. They could not prove their unkind conclusions, and they would not take them back. So he begins his second reply to Eliphaz with a sharp complaint about their worn-out comments. There was no consolation in the words of any of them, only extreme trouble. So he longed for an end of words of no more weight than the wind. It would be better to answer calmly, if they must speak at all, and not with the sharpness of irritation.
Empty words are not neutral. The same writer puts the failure in medical terms:
William KellyAnd no doubt Job was speaking the plain truth. He would have been a comforter of sorrow; he would not have been a physician without any medicine. They brought poison into his wounds instead of something to soothe them.
Job asks whether the words will ever end . They never do, because each answer only starts another round:
C. H. MackintoshSo the three friends failed to convince Job. Their ministry was one-sided. Instead of silencing Job, they only led him out into a discussion that seemed almost endless. He gives them word for word, and far more.
The rebuke is sharp, but these men were not strangers who had wandered in:
J. G. BellettEliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar were true friends, though they turned out to be only "miserable comforters." They came to Job when everyone else had deserted him. They were sincere-hearted friends, who said they would go and comfort their suffering brother. And they did go; and they sat with him in his place of ashes and broken pottery for seven days.
Sincerity was not the missing ingredient; understanding was. One writer explains why their comfort failed, and what good came out of the failure:
The Bible TreasuryAll merely human efforts to comfort, apart from God and the truth, fall short. They are more or less ignorant. And the failure shows more clearly the more bitter the trial is. Job's three friends were sincere in their care for him, and eager to serve him in his hour of sorrow. But the cause of his affliction completely baffled them. They could not understand how such a perfect and upright man could be tried so severely. They might have helped in an ordinary case. But here was a truly righteous man who had lost everything he owned, in a way never seen before. Their tongues fell silent. They did not understand God's ways with His own at all. Their false and unworthy suggestions made Job feel how unable they were to help him, and threw him back on God Himself.
- Windy — Eliphaz called his speeches the consolations of God. Job found nothing new in them, only the same stock of accusations.
- Provoking — Job asks what drives Eliphaz to answer at all. Tone matters as much as content: if they must speak, let them speak calmly, not out of irritation.
- Poisonous — a comforter with no real help is a physician with no medicine. These friends went further and put poison into the wounds they came to dress.
- Endless — one-sided help never silences a sufferer. It only opens a debate that runs on and on.
- Providential — these were real friends who sat with him for seven days. Even their failure had a use: unable to help, they threw Job back on God Himself.
I also could speak as ye if your soul were in my soul's stead, I could join together words against you, and shake my head at you;
Eliphaz has just finished his second speech. Job answers with a challenge: imagine a swap of places, because it is his life, not theirs, that lies in ruins.
Job asks his friends to picture themselves in his place. One writer spells out what that would take.
William KellyJust let them change places, if that had been possible. Let those three friends be in Job's position. Let them lose their possessions and their families too, swept away in a way that looked like the effect of God's displeasure. Let their bodies suffer in a way as plain and as painful as Job's. Then even a careless onlooker would see the clear sign of some terrible dealing with them. Put them in that position, with Job as the friend who comes to speak with them. Could he not have used words and looks just as severe?
"Heap up words" and "shake my head" are two halves of the same picture: speech that piles on, and a gesture that mocks. Job is saying he has the same weapons, and could use them just as well.
William KellyPatient as Job proved to be, he does not spare the stubbornness of his friends, who could not prove their uncharitable conclusions and would not take them back. So he begins his second reply to Eliphaz with a sharp complaint about their worn-out comments. There was no consolation in the words of any of them, only extreme trouble. So he longed for an end of words that weighed no more than the wind. If they must speak, it would be better to answer calmly, and not with the sharpness of irritation. If it were possible for them to stand in his place, he could say words at least as cutting, and shake his head just as painfully.
The force of the verse lies in what Job holds back. He could pile up words against them and shake his head at them — and he will not. His friends made the opposite choice.
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz had claimed to be giving Job "the consolations of God," and this moves Job to reply bitterly, "Miserable comforters are you all!" Instead of comfort, they had given heartless accusations, which Job calls "words of wind." He says that if they were in his place, he could heap up words against them in the same cruel accusation, but he would not do so. He would use his words to strengthen and encourage them, to give them some relief. He longed for this himself, but they had nothing for him.
Behind Job's bitter words lies a real wound. These were not strangers. They had trusted him once, and dropped that trust the moment his circumstances changed.
Samuel RidoutThe friends had certainly opened themselves up to this rebuke. They had violated every God-given safeguard of friendship. They had contradicted all their former confidence in him. They treated Job as a stranger they knew nothing about, and guessed at his whole past from his present condition. It was an outrage against the name of friendship. We can well understand Job's disappointment and anger at such treatment.
Accusation does not close an argument; it opens one. The friends set out to silence Job and produced the opposite effect.
C. H. MackintoshTheir ministry was one-sided. Instead of silencing Job, they only led him out into a discussion that seemed almost endless. He gives them word for word, and far more.
Job's complaint points at something we still do. We are quick to find a weak point and slow to give real help.
W. T. TurpinIf we are walking with God, are we not aware how little we are able to help one another? It is painful to see how good we seem at finding each other's weak points. To tell a man he is at the bottom of a deep ditch is one thing; to be able, through grace, to lift him out of it is quite another. We must know the hand and heart of God, and His sustaining power, for ourselves. Then we can meet others in their varied circumstances. Like a skilled doctor, we will know what each medicine is worth and be ready to use it.
- Swap. Job's whole reply turns on one imagined swap. The friends talk so easily because the loss is not theirs.
- Wind. Their speeches are "words of wind" — plenty of talk, no weight, and nothing in them touches Job's real case.
- Restraint. Job proves he could pile on words and shake his head at them, and then declines to. Ability to wound is not permission to wound.
- Betrayal. They judged Job's whole past by his present condition. Writers call that an outrage against friendship itself.
- Medicine. Pointing out the ditch is easy. To lift someone out, you must first know God's sustaining power yourself.
[But] I would encourage you with my mouth, and the solace of my lips should assuage [your pain].
Job has just heard Eliphaz's second speech, and he answers by describing the comforter he would have been in their place. His claim raises the question the whole book presses: what really helps a person who is suffering?
Job is not reacting to silence but to speech — a great deal of it. One commentator sets the verse beside what Eliphaz claimed to be offering:
Leslie M. GrantEliphaz had claimed to be giving Job "the consolations of God," and this moves Job to reply bitterly, "Miserable comforters are you all!" (v.2). Instead of comfort, they had given heartless accusations, which Job calls "words of wind." He says that if they were in his place, he could pile up words against them in the same cruel way. But he would not do that. He would use his words to strengthen and encourage them, and to give them some relief. He longed for this himself, but they had nothing for him.
The force of Job's argument lies in an imagined exchange of positions. One writer spells out what that exchange would actually involve, and what it proves about Job:
William KellyJust let them change places, if that had been possible. Let those three friends be in Job's position. Let them have not only their possessions but their families swept away… Let their bodies suffer too, in a way as visible and agonising as Job's… Put them in those circumstances, with Job as the friend who comes to speak to them: could he not have used words and looks just as harsh? I cannot help thinking that Job's answer here is a deeply moving appeal, especially when he goes on, "I could strengthen you with my mouth." There he clearly has the advantage in grace over them… Not one word of that kind or purpose had come from them.
The two verbs matter. Job does not say he would agree with them or explain their trouble away; he says his mouth would make them stronger and his lips would take the edge off their pain. Another writer renders the line "the solace of my lips" and draws out the contrast Job is making:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHe meets their wrong accusations with great skill. He brings out his suffering afresh, yet always with that horrible nightmare behind it: God is not for me, but against me! Such things as Eliphaz spoke he had heard before. What are you anyway? Nothing but miserable comforters. If they were in his condition, he would speak too. "I could strengthen you with my mouth, and the solace of my lips would assuage your pain." I would never treat you as you treat me.
Words meant to soothe can do the opposite. One writer takes Job's claim as honest, and measures the friends by it:
William KellyAnd no doubt Job spoke the plain truth. He would have been a comforter of sorrow, not a physician with no medicine. They brought poison into his wounds instead of something to soothe them. He said, 'I have been pouring out my sorrow, but I am no better for it.'
The friends were not liars. Their problem lay deeper, in what they did not know about God:
J. N. DarbyAnd what had his friends done for him during the sifting he was going through? He had good reason to say, "Miserable comforters are you all." They had no true grasp of God's character, so they could not understand His dealings with a soul. They had no proper sense of sin. So they did not know that if God was going to bless man, it had to be entirely on the ground of grace. They did not know how to meet his case. They had said many true things, yet not one single right thing that applied to Job, because they did not understand him.
Their collapse as comforters was not wasted. One writer traces where it drove Job:
The Bible TreasuryAll merely human efforts to comfort, apart from God and the truth, fall short, because they are more or less ignorant. The harder the trial, the more obvious that failure becomes… They might have been of use if his were an ordinary case. But when a deeply righteous man lost every possession he had, in a way no one had ever seen, they had nothing to say. They did not understand God's ways with His own people at all. Their false and unworthy suggestions made Job feel how completely unable they were to help him, and they threw him back on God Himself.
- Wind words. Job calls what he received "words of wind": plenty of speech, no relief. His complaint is not that his friends were silent, but that their talk was empty.
- Weighed words. Job's test is a change of places. He could have matched them accusation for accusation. Instead he named what his mouth would have done: strengthen, and ease their grief.
- Wounding words. Instead of medicine they brought poison to his wounds. A comforter with nothing to give is a physician with no cure.
- Why words fail. They said many true things and not one right thing for Job. They did not grasp God's character, His dealings with a soul, or that blessing must come on the ground of grace.
- Where words end. Human comfort apart from God breaks down fastest when the trial is worst. By leaving Job with nothing, they threw him back on God Himself.