Wherefore should I take my flesh in my teeth, and put my life in my hand?
Job has stopped arguing with his three friends and turned to face God. In this verse he counts the cost of that move: what does a suffering man risk when he brings his case straight to God?
Job's long reply to Zophar moves in stages, and this verse marks the turn from men to God. One outline sets it out plainly:
Samuel RidoutThe discourse may be divided into three main parts. (1) He answers his friends (Job 12:1 — 13:13). (2) He challenges God (Job 13:14-28). (3) A hope of immortality amid despair (Job 14).
Both pictures point one way: Job is staking his own life. One writer gives the sense in a single sentence:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinVerses 14-28: here his words are addressed to God Himself. He dares to approach Him. He knows the greatness and awesomeness of God. He is perhaps also aware that he has not honoured Him as he should have done. So he says — and this would be the meaning of this difficult verse — "Come what may, I take my life in my hand and risk it."
Job puts this as a question, and he throws it at his friends. He wants them to work out what would make a man take such a risk:
Leslie M. GrantHe asks them, "Why should I take my flesh in my teeth and put my life in my hand?" Did his friends stop to think why he would open himself up to their ridicule and criticism like this? Was there not a reason for it?
Job has just told his friends to be silent, and said he will take whatever comes. One writer puts that readiness into Job's own words:
William KellyNow here I am, ready to bear whatever God sends. I feel the awfulness of it, and the terrors of God are on my soul; but here I am; let Him do as seems good in His sight.
The verses that follow show two forces pulling against each other in Job:
F. B. HoleOn the one hand, there was a remarkable spirit of faith. It led him to take everything that had happened from His hand. He did not concern himself with those who brought the disasters, which had stopped short of his death. He had wanted to die. If God should grant that wish and kill him, he would not lose confidence but would still trust in Him. This indeed was excellent. But at the same time Job revealed his very weak spot in his determination to "maintain," or "defend," his own ways before Him. So we see that in a true saint very real faith in God may exist, while a very determined measure of self-esteem still spoils it. This is what gives such great value to this remarkable book, since the flesh in us who are saints today is just the same as it was in Job some four thousand years ago.
Commentators differ over what comes next, because verse 15 can be read two ways:
Samuel RidoutSo the frail creature takes his life in his hand and stands before his Maker. God can only strike dead a man who has no hope, but Job must speak out and defend his ways as upright before God. This is the thought which seems most in accord with what goes before. On the other hand, many — perhaps most — prefer the wording of the Authorized Version: "Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him." Read that way, it would be a gleam of light in the middle of awful darkness, and it seems to agree with what follows. Aware of his own uprightness, Job seems to think there may be hope. Either way, he must speak.
Job longed to plead his case with God, but he did not know how to reach Him:
William Kelly"Surely I would speak to the Almighty, and I desire to reason with God." That is just what he was doing. But how? He did not know. The New Testament did not exist yet. There was no one to stand between God and man, as Christ does. So he did not know how to get at Him. If he could only find Him; if he could only be before Him! He knew very well what he would find there — a faithful God. But somehow there were difficulties and riddles between God and his soul that he could not understand.
The next writer names what Job lacked, and what we now have:
Samuel RidoutHow these words, beautiful in their very anguish, cry aloud for the blessed Mediator, the one who stands between God and man! Blessed be God, we can "draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need." Job could only grope in darkness.
- Risk. Flesh in the teeth, life in the hand — come what may, Job stakes his life on speaking to God.
- Reason. The verse is a question thrown at the friends — ask yourselves why a man would expose himself like this.
- Readiness. Job's answer is to stand there feeling the terror and still say: let God do as He sees fit.
- Flaw. Real faith in Job ran alongside a fixed determination to defend his own ways. The same flesh is in us, which is why the book still reads like our own portrait.
- Relief. Job had no one to stand between him and God. What he groped for in the dark is now the open way to the throne of grace.
Behold, if he slay me, yet would I trust in him; but I will defend mine own ways before him.
Job has lost everything, and three friends keep insisting his suffering proves hidden sin. His answer to them holds a famous line of trust — and a second half that is rarely quoted with it.
(The commentators below use older translations. Where the ESV has "I will hope in him," they have "yet will I trust in Him." Where it has "I will argue my ways to his face," they have "I will maintain my own ways before Him.")
Job was told to curse God. Refusing showed him the one thing he could not do without.
J T MawsonCurse God! That would have meant giving up his God. Could he do that? Never. He could lose everything, but not his God. Many things may have seemed necessary to him in the past. But he had now reached this point: he could do without everything except God. God alone was necessary to Job. That is why he later cried out, in his agony and earnestness of soul, "Though He slay me yet will I trust in Him."
Job says wild things in these chapters. Yet he never crosses one line.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinNotice this. Though Job gives way to his feelings in this passionate outburst, he did not renounce God, and there is not one word of rebellion against Him. All through his answer to his friends' arguments he does not lose sight of God. Again and again he expresses confidence in the One he cannot see, as in that unmatched saying, "Though He slay me, yet will I trust" (13:15).
Verse 14 speaks of taking his flesh in his teeth and putting his life in his hands. Verse 15 is his answer, and it has two parts: trust in God, and a defence of himself.
Leslie M. GrantHe asks them, "Why do I take my flesh in my teeth, and put my life in my hands?" (v.14). Did his friends ever ask why he would open himself up like this to their ridicule and criticism? Was there not a reason for this? In fact, he states firmly that even if God killed him, he would still trust Him. Did his trust in God show that he was guilty of hidden sin? No! he says, "I will defend my own ways, before Him" (v.15).
Self-justification and real faith grow side by side in this speech, and they do not carry him equally far.
The Bible TreasuryHow little progress a soul makes while it is busy justifying itself! … He is only judging himself the way a man would… He sees no purpose of grace in God's ways with him. Yet his soul is clearly gaining ground, for he cries out, "Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him," and a gleam of hope breaks in on his path.
Commentators read this line in two very different ways. It is either a shout of trust, or the words of a man with no hope left.
Samuel RidoutSo the frail creature takes his life in his hand and stands before his Maker. All God can do is strike dead a man who has no hope. But Job must speak out and defend his ways as upright before God. That reading seems to fit best with what comes before. On the other hand, many — perhaps most — prefer the older King James wording: "Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him." Read that way, the line is a gleam of light in the middle of awful darkness, and it seems to agree with what follows.
At the end of the book God rebukes the three friends and commends Job. God does not hold Job's angry speeches against him. He remembers something else.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinJob has confessed and Jehovah has forgiven. He forgets all Job's sinful utterances; He remembers them no more. But in infinite grace He picks out the few sentences scattered through Job's speeches where he honoured the Lord and expressed trust in Him. With these He is well pleased. It must have been sweet music in Jehovah's ear when Job said, "Though He slay me yet will I trust."
Job said this without seeing any purpose of grace in what God was doing. Believers today can go a step further.
A J PollockEven Job said, "Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him." But we are permitted to go a step further. We know that whatever God brings on the believer is not only the product of divine goodness. It is the deliberate planning of divine love. However severe the trial, however deep the pain, however hard the testing, it only convinces us more of that clear warm love that makes no mistakes.
- Stripped — Job lost everything and found that God alone was the one thing he could not do without.
- Steady — He questioned God's ways, but he never renounced Him or lost sight of Him.
- Split — The same verse holds real trust and a defence of his own record. His soul gains ground; his self-justification makes little progress.
- Disputed — Some read it as a man with no hope facing death. Most read it as a shout of trust, which fits what follows.
- Treasured — God forgot Job's rash words and kept his few sentences of trust. That is what pleased Him at the end.
This also shall be my salvation, that a profane man shall not come before his face.
Job has lost everything, and the friends around him have become his critics. In the middle of his defence he says something startling. The fact that he dares to bring his case before God is itself his hope. A godless man would never come that close.
Job's "salvation" is God Himself: God will not desert him. One writer follows the verse through — the confidence, the reason for it, and the vindication Job expects.
Leslie M. GrantWould God desert him? No! God would be his salvation. He was sure of this. It is true that appearances did not persuade his friends. If a man turned away from God by sinning, he would not have such confidence in God as Job had, "for a hypocrite could not come before Him" (v.16). So Job urges his friends (or critics) to listen closely to what he says. He had not been careless in preparing his case for judgment. He was certain his case deserved careful consideration, for he says, "I know I shall be vindicated" (v.18).
Where the ESV says "the godless," other translations say "hypocrite." One careful rendering brings out a third idea: defilement. The person who is unclean cannot stand there.
William KellyLook, He will slay me, yet will I trust Him; but my ways to His face I will argue. This also will be my salvation, that no polluted one shall come before Him... Look now, I have ordered my case, I know that I shall be justified.
Job is not saying "even if I am lost." He is looking past this life to the life to come. And his claim not to be a pretender is honest.
William KellyThere was a far deeper faith in Job than in all the other three, or in any of them. He did not mean, "though I am lost." Oh no, he had no idea of that. "Though He slay me" — he knew that the best thing was not life on the earth; he is learning that; the best thing is the life to come. There it would be all according to God; but here it is in confusion, and in every kind of moral anomaly. "He also shall be my salvation" — he has no doubt about that — "for a hypocrite shall not come before him." He was very far from that.
Two things run side by side in Job. He trusts God completely, and he still insists on defending himself.
F. B. HoleOn the one hand, there was a remarkable spirit of faith, which led him to take all that had happened from His hand... He had wanted to die. If God should answer that wish and slay him, he would not lose confidence but would still trust in Him. This was excellent. But at the same time Job revealed his very weak spot: he was determined to "maintain," or "defend" his own ways before Him. So we see that in a true saint very real faith in God may exist, and yet a very determined measure of self-esteem may spoil it.
Another writer traces that weak spot to its root. Job's uprightness was real, but he had begun to lean on it.
J. N. DarbyJob was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That clearly proves that he had never really been in the presence of God. The result was this. He reasoned better than his friends, and he showed a heart that felt far more than they did what God is. Yet he charged God with injustice, and with a desire to harass him without cause (see Job 19; 23:3, 13; 13:15-18; 16:12)... God was bringing him to say, "Now my eye sees You, and I abhor myself."
Commentators differ over the line just before verse 16. One reading has Job risking death in order to speak. The other has him trusting God even if God kills him.
Samuel RidoutSo the frail creature takes his life in his hand and stands before his Maker. God can only strike dead a man who has no hope, but Job must speak out and defend his ways as upright before God. This is the thought that seems to fit best with what goes before. On the other hand, many, perhaps most, prefer the reading of our Authorized Version: "Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him." Read that way, it is a gleam of light in the middle of awful darkness, and it seems to agree with what follows. Sure of his own uprightness, Job seems to think there may be hope. At any rate, he must speak.
- Confidence — God will not abandon Job. God Himself is his salvation, whatever the appearances say.
- Proof — Job dares to come to God. A man turned away from God by sin would never have that confidence.
- Depth — Job's faith reached past life on earth to the life to come. It ran deeper than the faith of all three friends.
- Flaw — real faith is mixed here with a stubborn drive to defend his own ways. Genuine trust can still be spoiled by self-esteem.
- Outcome — Job expected to be justified. God was bringing him to something else: to see God with his own eye, and to abhor himself.
Hear attentively my speech and my declaration with your ears.
Job has already told his three visitors to be quiet and let him speak. Now he presses the demand again, like a man opening his case in court — and everything turns on who he is really speaking to, and whether his confidence is well founded.
The call to listen comes at the end of a long dismissal of the men who came to comfort him. One writer sums up what Job wanted from them, and what he found instead:
F. B. HoleWhat he wanted was truth for his mind and healing for his body. They were only men who "whitewash with lies," and "worthless physicians." He advised them to keep quiet and listen to what he had to say, and he went on like this up to verse 13. He felt they had talked as though they were speaking for God, and in doing so had misrepresented Him. In this, no doubt, Job judged rightly.
But the friends were not the hearer he really wanted. They had already decided what was wrong with him:
Samuel RidoutWhat kind of physicians were they to treat a case like this? They have decided what his disease is, and misrepresent his symptoms to confirm their diagnosis! And they bring in their theory that God always punishes sin in this life to prove that Job is a sinner! Job turns from them in disgust... so he turns from man's unfair guesses to God.
What Job wants heard is a case he has prepared, as the next verse shows:
Leslie M. GrantSo Job urges his friends (or critics) to listen carefully to what he says. He had not been careless in preparing his case for judgment. He was certain his case deserved careful consideration... No doubt he would be cleared in the eyes of men in the end. But in the eyes of God it is a different matter, as Job admits in chapter 42:5-6, once God had fully weighed his case.
Job presses to be heard because he expects the hearing to go well for him:
William KellyThe fact that no hypocrite, no one defiled, comes into His presence was a promise of salvation to him, not a cause of alarm. He presses his demand with earnest force. He is sure of his innocence, and he does not refuse to die if he deserves it.
There is a simpler reason too. Speaking eased him:
William KellyIn the agony he was going through, it was a relief to him to speak out. All he wanted was to be put right if he was wrong.
One writer finds two things in Job at once here:
F. B. HoleOn the one hand, there was a remarkable spirit of faith, which led him to take all that had happened from His hand... He had wanted to die, and if God granted that and killed him, he would not lose confidence but would still trust Him. This was excellent. But at the same time Job showed his very weak spot: he was determined to "maintain," or "defend," his own ways before Him. So we see that in a true believer very real faith in God can exist, and yet be spoiled by a very determined measure of self-esteem.
Job wanted an explanation for his pain. He could not yet see what the pain was doing in him:
William KellyHe would hold fast to his integrity before Him, whatever they said, and he knew God would clear him. He asked only for relief from the suffering, and that the dread of Him would not overwhelm him. He wanted to find out all that was wrong in himself. He begged to know why he was blown about like a leaf or dry straw. He did not yet know the grace that was giving him self-judgment.
- Hearing asked. Job tells his friends to stop diagnosing and start listening. They had misrepresented God while claiming to speak for Him.
- Hearing prepared. His plea is an ordered case, not a burst of feeling — he believes it deserves careful consideration.
- Hearing welcomed. No hypocrite comes into God's presence — and that thought reassures Job instead of scaring him. Speaking out relieves him. He only wants to be put right if he is wrong.
- Hearing flawed. Real faith sits next to a firm resolve to defend his own ways. Genuine trust can still be spoiled by self-esteem.
- Hearing granted. God does hear him in the end. Once God weighs his case, Job speaks very differently. The suffering he resented was grace teaching him to judge himself.
Behold now, I have ordered the cause; I know that I shall be justified.
Job's three friends insist that his suffering proves he is hiding some sin. He turns away from them and speaks like a man in court, with his case laid out and his verdict expected. Is that confidence faith, self-esteem, or both at once?
The language is legal. Job has arranged his defence and expects the verdict to go his way. One writer notes the care behind the claim, and its limit:
Leslie M. GrantSo Job urges his friends (or critics) to listen closely to what he says. He had not been careless in preparing his case for judgment. He was certain it deserved careful consideration, for he says, "I know that I shall be in the right" (v.18). It was true that men would one day judge him to be in the right. But in the eyes of God it is a different matter, as Job admits in chapter 42:5-6, once God had fully weighed his case.
His friends had taken truths everyone accepted and bent them into an accusation against him:
Samuel RidoutNext, Job charges his friends outright with being false witnesses for God. They took well-known truths that everyone accepted and used them to back up their charge that Job was wicked. What kind of doctors were these, to treat a case like this? They have already decided what his disease is, and they twist his symptoms to fit their diagnosis!
Job's confidence here is not a simple thing. One writer finds two elements in him at once, and only one of them is healthy:
F. B. HoleIn verses 14-19, Job has God before his mind, not his friends. We can see two conflicting elements. On the one hand, there was a remarkable spirit of faith... This was excellent. But at the same time Job showed his very weak spot: he was determined to "maintain," or "defend," his own ways before Him. So we see that in a true believer very real faith in God may exist, and yet be spoiled by a very determined measure of self-esteem.
Job even asked God to show him what was wrong in himself. What he missed was where that desire came from:
William KellyHe would hold on to his integrity before Him, whatever they said, and he knew he would be justified. He asked only for relief from his suffering, and that the terror of God would not overwhelm him. He wanted to find out everything that was wrong in himself... He did not yet know the grace that was giving him this self-judgment.
Job's uprightness was real. The danger lay in what he did with it:
J. N. DarbyJob was upright, but he began to make this his righteousness. That clearly proves he had never really been in the presence of God. The result was this: although he reasoned more correctly than his friends, and showed a heart that felt far more deeply than theirs what God is, he charged God with injustice and with wanting to harass him for no reason (see Job 19; 23:3, 13; 13:15-18; 16:12).
It helps to remember what was on trial in this book:
W. H. WestcottGod allowed Satan to test Job. The test was not to find out whether Job's soul was saved and whether he stood righteous before God. It was to find out whether Job feared God only because of his prosperity and his material advantages — which Satan claimed were enough on their own to make a man godly.
Job got the verdict he wanted, but not on his terms. It came when he stopped defending himself:
F. B. HoleWhen his friends slandered Job, he felt it very deeply. But for a long time he fought for his own reputation instead of committing his way to the Lord. When he finally did commit it, God soon brought out His righteousness as the light and His judgment as the noonday. As soon as he condemned himself and justified God, his righteousness became clear, and God Himself testified that at last he had spoken what was right.
- Prepared. Job speaks like a man in court. His case is arranged, and he expects the verdict to go his way.
- Provoked. He speaks because his friends acted as false witnesses for God. They fitted true statements to a false diagnosis.
- Mixed. Real faith and a stubborn defence of his own ways stand side by side in him. Self-esteem can spoil genuine trust.
- Misplaced. His uprightness was real. Turning it into his righteousness was the error, and it led him to charge God with injustice.
- Reversed. The verdict Job argued for came when he stopped arguing. He condemned himself and justified God, and God declared that he had spoken what was right.
Who is he that contendeth with me? For if I were silent now, I should expire.
Job has stopped arguing with his friends Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar, and now lays his case before God like a man in court. The question he throws out here — who will bring a charge against me? — is a dare to his accusers, but he speaks it in God's hearing — and that is where innocence is finally tested.
His friends had been pressing charges against him. His question demands that someone step forward and prove one, and he says his own life hangs on the answer.
Leslie M. GrantHe had not been careless in preparing his case for judgment. He was fully certain it deserved careful consideration, for he says, "I know I shall be vindicated" (v.18). No doubt he would be vindicated in the eyes of men in the end. But in the eyes of God it is a different matter, as Job admits in chapter 42:5-6, when God fully considered his case. Meanwhile he asks who could rightly contend with him, for his friends' contentions were empty. He felt it necessary to defend himself — or perish (v.19).
The second half of the verse describes his condition, not a threat. Staying quiet under false accusation would finish him, and speaking was the only relief he had left.
William Kelly"Who is there who will contend with me? For then I would be silent and die." That is, in the agony he was going through, it was a relief to him to speak out. All he wanted was to be put right if he was wrong.
Job does not claim to be untouchable. He wants the charge against him named, and he will take the consequences if it holds.
William KellyHe calls attention to his demand earnestly and forcefully, assured of his innocence, and not refusing to die if he deserved it.
Job had decided his three visitors were useless as advisers and worse as witnesses. He wanted to deal with God instead, and he held on to his integrity — though he did not yet see what God was working in him.
William KellyIt was with God he wished to speak, not with such quacks as they, whose wisdom would be to keep quiet. He reckoned they had spoken wickedly and deceitfully for God, who had given them no such authority, and who would surely reprove them — as in fact He did. He would hold his integrity fast before Him, whatever they said, and he knew he would be justified... He did not yet know the grace that was giving him self-judgment.
Job asked who would contend with him. Much later God puts that same word back to him.
William Kelly"Moreover the LORD answered Job and said, Shall he who contends with the Almighty instruct Him?" He ought to be able to, if he judges God. This is exactly what fills Job with shame... Job had contended with the Almighty. "He who reproves God, let him answer it."... Job was brought completely down in his own opinion of himself, ashamed of having complained against God and His ways without understanding the least of them.
Grant contrasts Job's tone here with his tone once God had spoken.
Leslie M. GrantHow different his words were when God spoke to him directly: "I lay my hand on my mouth" (ch.40:4) — that is, he kept quiet.
- Challenge. Job dares anyone to name a charge against him. His friends' accusations were empty, and he would sooner die than leave them unanswered.
- Silence. Keeping quiet under that pressure would have killed him. Speaking was his only relief, and he asked only for correction if he was wrong.
- Offer. Job claims no immunity. Sure of his innocence, he offers to fall silent and die if anyone can name a real charge.
- Gap. His integrity was genuine before men. But being cleared by men and being cleared by God are two different verdicts. Job had not yet learned that the grace at work in him was producing self-judgment.
- Answer. God later turns Job's own question around on him. The man who silenced three friends lays his hand on his mouth, ashamed of having complained about ways he never understood.
Only do not two things unto me; then will I not hide myself from thee.
Job has told his friends to be quiet. He turns to God with his case, but first he asks for two things — and those two requests expose the deepest problem of the book: how can a man come near God when God's presence is exactly what terrifies him?
One commentator reads the request with the lines that follow, where Job names the two things and promises he will not hide once they are granted:
William KellyAll he wanted was to be put right if he was wrong. He now says, "Only grant me two things, then I will not hide myself from your face. Withdraw your hand far from me" — the outward thing — "and let not dread of you terrify me" — the inward — "then call, and I will answer" — and so he did — "or let me speak, and you reply to me. How many are my iniquities and my sins?"
Job has just finished his long answer to Zophar, one of his three friends. He now turns to the only other party left:
Samuel RidoutIn this answer he turns, in effect, from his friends to God; but sadly, he finds no answer to his awful terror of doubt and darkness.
One writer hears in Job's two requests a cry for someone to stand between him and God:
Samuel RidoutBut how dare he speak before the One from whose presence he would instinctively flee? Let Him at least remove the awful dread that chills Job's heart, and relieve him of his pain, and he will answer Him or address Him. How these words, beautiful in their very anguish, cry aloud for the blessed Daysman, the Mediator! Thanks be to God, we can "with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need." Job could only grope in darkness.
"Daysman" is an old word for an umpire — someone who stands between two sides and settles the matter.
Another writer ties Job's two requests straight to Christ. Job had no one to stand between himself and God:
J. N. DarbyYou see, Job could not answer God, and he is struggling under this. What does he say he wants? "There is no arbiter between us, who might lay his hand on us both." Oh, I have no arbiter! "Let Him take His rod away from me, and let not dread of Him terrify me." What Job says he did not have is exactly what we have now in Christ. Was Christ a terror in this world? The law was exactly that; there were thunderings and lightnings. Even Moses said, "I tremble with fear," and the people said, "Do not let God speak to us." The law struck with terror, but it produced no real change in man, and no confidence in God.
God answered, though not the way Job expected. A new speaker, Elihu, opens by meeting both of Job's conditions. The older translation has Elihu say, "I am according to thy wish in God's stead":
William Kelly"Behold, I am toward God as you are; I too was pinched off from a piece of clay." This is exactly what Job had desired, and now beyond his expectation. When his friends had completely disappointed him, God supplies the help that was needed: patient consideration of the terribly trying circumstances, with jealousy for God's glory at the right moment. And it comes from the last quarter Job would have looked to for it. "Behold, no fear of me need terrify you." He had complained that God acted this way on his soul and body… "my pressure will not be heavy on you." It was God's hand that Job had so strongly pleaded against.
Job's request was honest, but one writer points out what Job still could not see:
William KellyHe asked only for a reprieve from suffering, and that His dread should not overwhelm him. He wanted to find out everything that was wrong in himself, and begged to know why he was driven back and forth like a leaf or dry stubble. He did not yet know the grace that was giving him self-judgment.
- Two conditions. Job asks God to lift the hand that afflicts him and to take away the dread — one outward, one inward.
- One direction. Done with his friends, he turns to God alone — and still hears no reply.
- One gap. He longs to speak with God and dreads Him at once. What he lacks is a mediator to lay a hand on both sides.
- One answer. Elihu arrives saying what Job had asked for — no terror, no heavy hand — help from the quarter Job least expected.
- One gift. What Job lacked, believers have in Christ: God near without terror, and confidence to come to the throne of grace.
Withdraw thy hand far from me; and let not thy terror make me afraid
Job turns from his three friends and speaks straight to God. He asks for a hearing on two conditions, and those conditions show what he cannot bear: the pain, and the terror of facing God while it lasts.
Job names what he needs before he can face God without hiding. One writer takes his request in two halves:
Leslie M. GrantHe asks, "Only two things do not do to me" (v.20). If so, then Job would not try to hide from God. First, "Withdraw your hand far from me." That is, do not keep up this trying affliction, which Job felt he could not stand. Second, "let not the dread of You make me afraid" (v.21). He did not want to be terrified by the contemplation of the glory of God.
The two requests are not one trouble said twice:
William KellyHe says now, "Only do not two things to me; then I will not hide myself from You. Withdraw your hand far from me" — the outward thing — "and let not dread of You" — the inward — "terrify me: then call, and I will answer" — and so he did — "or let me speak, and You answer me. How many are my iniquities and sins?"
Job's physical pain was real. One writer says the inner terror cut deeper — and rested on a mistake:
Samuel RidoutHere we reach the part of his sufferings that was probably more intense than the physical side. One thing gave a sharpness to his grief: the sense that God's wrath was upon him, that the dreadful poison of His anger was consuming him. We know this was a mistake. God was chastening His poor servant in this way, and that was only another proof of His love. But he did not know it, and we should not be harsh with one who felt that the Lord was dealing bitterly with him.
The plea does bring Job to the right question — but he does not stay with it:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinRelieve me from the sufferings, withdraw your hand far from me, which rests upon me; and let not your terror make me afraid. Then call, and I will answer; or let me speak, and answer me (verses 20-22). Then once more the right note, the note he must sound to the full in his wretched misery — "How many are my iniquities and sins? Make me to know my transgression and my sins." But it lasted only a moment. He breaks out in fresh charges against God.
Commentators read Job's state here with sympathy but not approval. One notes that Job asked only for a break from the pain, and did not yet see what the pain was doing in him:
William KellyHe asked only for a reprieve from suffering, and that His dread should not overwhelm him; he wished to find out all that was wrong in himself, and begged to know why he was driven to and fro like a leaf or dry stubble. He did not yet know the grace that was giving him self-judgment.
Earlier Job had wished for a "daysman" — a go-between who could lay a hand on God and on him at once. One writer sets that wish beside Job's plea here:
J. N. DarbyYou see Job could not answer God, and he is struggling under this: what does he say he wants? "Neither is there any daysman between us that might lay his hand upon both." Oh, I have no daysman! "Let him take his rod away from me and let not his fear terrify me." What Job said he did not have is exactly what we have now in Christ. Was Christ a terror in this world?
Later in the book a fourth speaker, Elihu, arrives after the three friends fall silent. He opens by granting Job the very terms he had asked for:
Samuel RidoutHe reminds Job of his own desire for such a person: "Oh that someone would plead for a man with God, as a man pleads for his neighbour" (Job 16:21). To this desire Elihu now replies: "I am here in God's place, just as you wished; I also am formed out of clay. My terror will not make you afraid, and my hand will not be heavy on you" (Job 33:6-7).
But the answer came with a correction Job had not asked for:
William KellyIt was quite true that Job hid no such wickedness as his friends hinted at. But it was completely false to think God had no reason. He had the wisest reasons for withering self in Job's eyes.
- Two things. Job asks God for two things: lift the hand that is crushing him, and take away the dread that terrifies him. One is outward, the other inward.
- The dread is worse. The sense that God's anger was against him hurt worse than the physical pain. That sense was wrong: God was chastening him in love.
- The wish behind the wish. What Job lacks is a go-between who can touch God and touch him at once — a hand that is not heavy.
- Right for a moment. In the same breath he asks God to show him his sins. That is the right note. But he drops it and turns to fresh charges against God.
- Granted, and more. Elihu answers on Job's own terms: no terror, no heavy hand. What Job said he did not have, commentators say, we now have in Christ.
Then call, and I will answer; or I will speak, and answer thou me.
Job's friends keep treating his suffering as proof of hidden guilt, so he turns from them and speaks to God. He asks for a hearing on his own terms — but may a man set conditions before his Maker?
Verse 22 does not stand alone. It is the second half of what Job asks. The first half names two things that must go before any talk can start.
Leslie M. GrantHe asks, "Only do not do two things to me" (v.20). If so, then Job would not try to hide from God. First, "Withdraw your hand far from me." That is, do not go on with this affliction, which Job felt he could not bear. Second, "let not the dread of You make me afraid" (v.21). He did not want the thought of God's glory to terrify him.
The two conditions deal with different troubles. Only when they go does Job make his offer.
William Kelly"Withdraw your hand far from me" — that is the outward thing. "And let not your dread" — the inward — "make me afraid." "Then call, and I will answer" — and so he did — "or let me speak, and answer me."
Job is not only defending himself. He is reaching for contact with God.
Leslie M. GrantWas there not a possibility of some communication with God? Either let God call him and let Job answer, or let Job speak and God respond to him (v.22).
Job does not hold that tone for long.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinRelieve me from the sufferings. Withdraw Your hand, which rests on me, and keep it far away. And let not Your terror make me afraid. Then call, and I will answer (verses 20-22). Or let me speak, he says, and answer me. Then the right note sounds once more. In the end he must sound that note in full in his wretched misery — "How many are my iniquities and sins? Make me to know my transgression and my sins." But it lasted only a moment. He breaks out in fresh charges against God.
The condition attached to the invitation exposes Job's real problem. He wants to speak, and he cannot bear to.
Samuel RidoutBut how dare he speak before that One from whose presence he would instinctively flee? Let Him at least remove the awful dread that chills Job's heart. Let Him relieve his pain, and Job will answer or speak to Him. How these words, beautiful in their very anguish, cry aloud for the blessed Daysman, the Mediator! Blessed be God, we can "with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need."
Earlier Job had named what he lacked.
J. N. DarbyYou see Job could not answer God, and he is struggling under this: what does he say he wants? "There is no arbiter between us, who might lay his hand on us both." Oh, I have no arbiter! "Let Him take His rod away from me, and let not dread of Him terrify me." What Job said he did not have is exactly what we have now in Christ. Was Christ a terror in this world?
Two things are at work in Job at once, and they pull against each other.
F. B. HoleOn the one hand, there was a remarkable spirit of faith... He had wanted to die. If God granted that wish and killed him, he would not lose confidence but would still trust Him. This was excellent. But Job also showed his weak spot. He was determined to "maintain," or "defend" his own ways before Him. So we see that a true saint may have very real faith in God, and yet a determined streak of self-esteem can spoil it.
Job got his hearing. It did not run the way he had drafted it.
F. B. HoleLook back at the beginning of Job 23. There Job had expressed his wish to get into contact with God, in a self-confident way. He felt sure he could set out his case before Him... Now the moment had come for his wish to come true. Jehovah tells him to dress for action like a man, and to be ready to answer the voice of God. The questionings now should come from God.
- Terms — Job will speak only if two things go: the hand pressing on his body, and the dread pressing on his heart.
- Turning — He drops the argument with his friends and asks God for a hearing. He will speak first or second; he only wants a reply.
- Lack — His conditions expose what he does not have: no mediator, and so no way to come near without terror.
- Supply — What Job lacked, we now have in Christ, who was no terror in this world.
- Reversal — The call came, but the questions came from God's side. The hearing Job had planned as his own defence left him with nothing to say.
How many are mine iniquities and sins? Make me to know my transgression and my sin.
Job has stopped arguing with his friends and now speaks straight to God. He asks God Himself to name his sins, and a protest runs under the request: the punishment has outrun the crime.
Job leaves the argument with his friends and takes his case to God. The moment he does, his tone about himself changes.
F. B. HoleVerse 23 shows that as soon as Job felt himself to be before God, he acknowledged iniquity and sins. He wanted to know how many they were. As the following verses reveal, he felt that the punishment he was suffering went beyond what he really deserved. He was like a man with his feet in the stocks, and so an easy target for anyone who wanted to throw things at him.
Job never claims to be sinless. He has settled for a verdict he and his neighbours could reach on their own. That is what he had to unlearn.
William KellyDid he say there was no sin in him? He never said anything of the kind. He never had the presumption to say, "I am clean in Your eyes." No, far from it. Unfortunately he had rested instead in being clean in his own eyes, and in the eyes of other people. But he had to learn that being clean in God's eyes was a very different thing. He begins to learn that more and more deeply.
The request is sincere, but it is not pure. A few lines later, the same voice that asked God to show him his sin starts filing charges against Him.
Samuel RidoutAnd yet at once he renews his charges against God. He is not yet ready to have all his imagined righteousness stripped away. God holds him as an enemy. He drives him like a withered leaf before the storm. He accuses him of those almost forgotten sins of youth — ah, Job, it seems that even you must admit there have been sins. He watches him, and makes his imagined robe of righteousness look like a moth-eaten garment.
Job wants to meet God and speak. But he has no one to bring him there, and that gap is the ache running through his words.
Samuel RidoutHow these words, beautiful in their very anguish, cry aloud for the blessed Daysman, the Mediator! Blessed be God! We can "with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need." Job could only grope in darkness.
Job never gets the list he asks for. What he gets instead is the one thing he needed.
J. N. DarbyJob needed this, and God saw that he needed it. He was gracious and devout, but he did not know himself. He had never seen God in a way that brought him to a real knowledge of himself in His presence. So God deals with him in a way that brings his sinfulness fully out. Then He places him in His own presence, with that sinfulness now plain to his conscience.
Only God can show a person what is wrong inside. The prayer that fits is not a question about one item, but an open door.
Frederick W. GrantWe need continual recourse to Him whom the psalmist called on: "Search me, O God, and know my heart! Try me and know my thoughts! And see if there be any grievous way in me." What incompetent judges we are in our own case! We do not say to Him, "Search out this or that," but, "Search me." And so, if we are perfectly honest in it, we invite the light to pour into all the dark corners and crannies of our lives and hearts. We are with Him without reserve — for self-judgment, but as He shows us to ourselves and so enables us.
- Turning. Once Job stands before God, he admits iniquity and sins instead of defending a clean record.
- Mirror. He never claimed to be sinless. He rested in being clean in his own eyes and other people's. God's eyes are a different measure.
- Mixture. The same breath that asks God to show him his sin also renews charges against Him. Job is not yet willing to lose his imagined righteousness.
- Mediator. Job's plea cries out for a mediator he does not have. He groped in darkness; we draw near with confidence to the throne of grace.
- Method. God answers not with a list but with Himself. He brings Job's sinfulness out, then sets him in His presence with his conscience awake. Pray it as "search me," not "search out this or that."
Wherefore dost thou hide thy face, and countest me for thine enemy?
Job has stopped arguing with his three friends and turned to God Himself. His cry here is the sharpest in the book so far: a hidden face, and a man counted among God's foes. Two questions follow. Is the charge true? And what should a suffering believer do when God seems silent?
Why is Job speaking to God at all, instead of answering his friends?
F. B. HoleHe did not claim to be better than his friends, but he was certainly not below them. Still, he admitted that God's dealings puzzled him, since they were far above him and out of his sight. So, as verse 3 shows, what he wanted was to speak to the Almighty and reason with God, instead of spending his time reasoning with his friends.
The words sound like a plea, but they carry a charge. Job says God treats an innocent man as guilty. Later in the book, Elihu quotes the complaint back to him.
Samuel Ridout"Behold, He finds occasions (or, malicious things) against me, He counts me as His enemy" (Job 33:10)… "Why do You hide Your face and count me as Your enemy?" (Job 13:24; so also Job 19:11). So the insult against divine majesty becomes glaring — Job is pure, but God treats him as impure!
Gaebelein traces the outburst back to how Job saw himself:
Arno Clemens GaebeleinHe breaks out in fresh charges against God. His self-righteousness has blinded him so that he asks, "Why do You hide Your face and count me as Your enemy?" He brings terrible charges against his Maker — charges of injustice.
Did Job ever claim there was no sin in him?
William KellyHe never said anything of the kind; he never had the presumption to say, "I am clean in Your eyes." No, no, far from it. Sadly, he had rested in being clean in his own eyes, and in other people's eyes. But he had to learn that being clean in God's eyes was a very different thing. He begins to learn that more and more deeply.
What comes after the question is a list of what Job thinks God is doing to him.
Samuel RidoutGod holds him as an enemy. He drives him like a withered leaf before the wind. He accuses him of those almost forgotten sins of youth (ah, Job, it seems that even you must admit there have been sins). He watches him, and makes his imagined robe of righteousness look like a moth-eaten garment. So Job charges his Maker, and does not pause to hear what He will reply.
Later in the book, Elihu answers this charge:
Samuel RidoutWill he apologise for the apparent discrepancy in God's ways, and seek to explain it away? No; in one brief sentence he sets aside all human reasoning — "God is greater than man." In other words, God is God. If we are to reason, let it not be from the lesser to the greater, but from the greater to the less. Let us say, How could the Almighty, all-perfect Being commit an unrighteous act? "Shall not the Judge of all the earth do what is just?" (Gen. 18:25).
Job wants to speak to God and dreads Him at the same time.
Samuel RidoutBut how dare he speak before the One he would instinctively flee from? … How these words, beautiful in their very anguish, cry aloud for the blessed Daysman, the Mediator! Blessed be God, we can "with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need." Job could only grope in darkness.
Job's place in history matters too:
James McBroomWe must also remember that the saints of earlier days were not in as good a position as we are today. … The blessed God doubtless met them in their needs, but they did not have, as we do, a sympathising high Priest in heaven. … This man, along with David and Hezekiah, shows us the saint in bodily suffering.
- Turning. Job stops arguing with his friends and takes his case to God. But he brings his self-defence with him.
- Accusing. The question is a charge in disguise: that God treats a pure man as impure. Elihu later quotes it back as proof.
- Blinded. Job never claimed to be sinless. He rested in being clean in his own eyes. He had yet to learn what it means to be clean in God's.
- Answered. The reply is not an explanation of God's ways but a word about God: "God is greater than man." Reason from the greater down, not the lesser up.
- Provided. Job cried out for a Mediator he could not see. Believers now have a sympathising High Priest, and a throne of grace they can draw near to with confidence.
Wilt thou terrify a driven leaf? and wilt thou pursue dry stubble?
Job is deep in suffering and has turned from arguing with his three friends to speaking directly to God. He has just asked why God hides His face, and now he asks why such power would bother with such weakness.
Job never claimed to be free of sin. He had rested in looking clean to himself and to other people, and here he shows a man with no strength of his own.
William KellyDid he say that there was no sin in him? He never said anything of the kind; he was never so bold as to say, "I am clean in Your eyes." No, no, far from it. Sadly, he had rested in being clean in his own eyes and in the eyes of other people. He had to learn that being clean in God's eyes was a very different thing. He begins to learn that more and more deeply. "Why do You hide Your face and count me as Your enemy? Will You frighten a driven leaf?" Was that a person pretending to any strength?
Job's question is not only about weakness but about worth. He cannot see why God would trouble Himself with something so small. (Where the ESV says "dry chaff," older translations read "dry stubble.")
Leslie M. GrantBecause God did not respond, Job thought God considered him an enemy (v.24). He compared himself to a leaf or to dry stubble, not worth any attention. Why would God frighten an object so insignificant?
Job speaks honestly, but his words turn into charges against God. He states his case and does not wait to hear the reply.
Samuel RidoutAnd yet at once he renews his charges against God. He is not yet ready to let go of his imagined righteousness. God holds him as an enemy. God drives him like a withered leaf before the wind. God accuses him of those almost forgotten sins of youth (ah, Job, it seems that even you must admit there have been sins). So Job charges his Maker, and does not pause to hear what He will reply.
Job asked for relief, and for the reason behind his suffering. He could not see what that suffering was doing in him.
William KellyHe asked only for relief from suffering, and that the dread of Him should not overwhelm him. He wanted to find out all that was wrong in himself. He begged to know why he was driven to and fro like a leaf or dry stubble. He did not yet know the grace that was giving him self-judgment. He sees only a record kept of bitter things, and himself made to inherit his youthful iniquities.
The verse is a real prayer, torn out of a man in physical agony. Commentators place Job alongside others in Scripture who prayed like this.
James McBroomThis man, along with David and Hezekiah, shows a believer suffering in his body. "Why do You hide Your face and count me as Your enemy? Will You frighten a driven leaf and pursue dry chaff?" (Job 13:24-25). "O Lord, rebuke me not in Your anger, nor discipline me in Your wrath" (David, Ps. 6:1). For Hezekiah, see Isaiah 38. What good would a prayer book or a written form of prayer have been to men in such circumstances? No one can predict the distresses of the heart.
Job feels God's hand pressing hard on him. There is a worse place to be than that.
J Wilson SmithTo be "let alone" by God is the most awful condition in which man can find himself. It is ten thousand times better to be poured from one jar to another, like Job, than to be left to drift down the stream, like Ephraim. It is better to feel the weight of God's hand in discipline — for it is a Father's hand — than to live with the sense that He has turned His face away.
- Leaf. Job pictures himself as a blown leaf and dry stubble — a man making no claim to strength of his own.
- Enemy. God's silence made Job think that God counted him an enemy and was charging old sins to his account.
- Charge. The honest cry slides into an accusation, because Job is not yet willing to give up his own righteousness.
- Grace. The self-judgment growing in Job was grace at work, though he could not see it at the time.
- Face. God's hand in discipline is a Father's hand. Fear His turned-away face, not His blows.
For thou writest bitter things against me, and makest me to possess the iniquities of my youth;
Job turns from arguing with his three friends to speaking straight to God, and he reads his suffering as a bitter charge written against him. Two questions press: is God dragging up sins from decades back, and what does it mean to inherit them now?
Job has no scroll in front of him. He reads his wounds as though they were words.
Leslie M. GrantBecause God did not respond, it seemed to Job that God counted him as an enemy (v. 24)… He felt that God was writing bitter things against him — not literally, but at least in effect. He also felt that God was bringing up the sins of his youth, since his more recent sins would not be as blatant as those of his youth (v. 26).
One writer takes the line to mean that Job feared his old sins were landing on him at that moment. He sets that beside what Job still had to learn about himself.
William KellySadly he had rested in being clean in his own eyes, and in other people's eyes. But he had to learn that being clean in God's eyes was a very different thing… "For you write bitter things against me and make me inherit the iniquities of my youth" — it may be that they are coming upon me now.
Job means the line as an accusation against God. But he cannot make it without admitting something about himself.
Samuel RidoutAnd yet at once he renews his charges against God. He is not yet ready for God to strip away all his imagined righteousness… God accuses him of those almost forgotten sins of youth (ah, Job, it seems that even you must admit there have been sins). He watches him, and makes his imagined robe of righteousness look like a moth-eaten garment.
Job wanted to know what was wrong in him. One writer points out what Job could not see while it was happening.
William KellyHe wished to find out all that was wrong in himself, and begged to know why he was driven back and forth like a leaf or dry stubble. He did not yet know the grace that was giving him self-judgment. He sees only a record kept of bitter things, and himself made to inherit the iniquities of his youth.
Job wanted to put his case to God, but had no one to stand between. One writer hears that cry in these words.
Samuel RidoutHow these words, beautiful in their very anguish, cry aloud for the blessed go-between, the Mediator! Blessed be God, we can come with confidence to the throne of grace, to receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need. Job could only grope in the dark.
Job complains that God charges his youth against him. A psalm prays about the same sins of youth, and asks God not to remember them.
Leslie M. Grant"Remember, O Lord, Your tender mercies and Your loving kindnesses, for they are from of old" (v. 6)… And He will answer too the prayer that follows, "Do not remember the sins of my youth, nor my transgressions" (v. 7). Where there is faith that depends on Him, He will not remember the sins of our youth against us. Nor will He remember our transgressions against us.
- Written — Job reads his suffering as a charge God is drafting against him. The writing is not literal, but it is real in effect.
- Inherited — he fears the sins of his youth are landing on him now, since his later sins were not as blatant as those early ones.
- Exposed — the complaint hides a confession. Even Job has to admit there were sins, and his imagined robe of righteousness starts to look moth-eaten.
- Misread — the bitter things were grace at work, giving him self-judgment. Job did not yet know it.
- Answered — Job groped in the dark for a mediator. We can come to God with confidence, and where faith depends on Him, He will not remember the sins of our youth against us.
And thou puttest my feet in the stocks, and markest all my paths; thou settest a bound about the soles of my feet; --
Job has stopped arguing with his friends and now speaks straight to God. What comes out is not a prayer but a charge: he feels shamed, watched and fenced in like a prisoner, by the very One he wants an answer from.
Job names a real device, not a vague picture. A Bible dictionary defines the word behind "stocks":
Morrish Bible Dictionarysad: stocks in which the feet were shut up. Job 13:27; Job 33:11; Acts 16:24.
So Job is not just saying God limits him. He is saying God has shamed him in public and left nothing about him unrecorded:
William Kelly"You put my feet also in the stocks" — you make me an object of shame before everybody — "and look closely at all my paths; you set a mark on the heels of my feet." Someone might think the heels were hidden. But no — everything is marked.
(Kelly follows an older reading, "you set a print upon the heels of my feet"; the ESV has "you set a limit for the soles of my feet.")
A man locked in stocks cannot dodge what is thrown at him. Job felt the blows were more than he had earned:
F. B. HoleHe felt that the punishment he was suffering went beyond what he deserved. He was like a man with his feet in the stocks, and so an easy target for those who wanted to throw things at him.
Read on its own the verse sounds like a description of pain. In context, it is one of several charges Job brings against God. What he defends is his own record:
Samuel RidoutAnd yet at once he renews his charges against God. He is not yet ready to let God strip away the righteousness he imagines he has. God holds him as an enemy. He drives him like a withered leaf in the wind. He charges him with those almost forgotten sins of youth — ah, Job, it seems that even you must admit there have been sins. He watches him, and makes the robe of righteousness Job imagines he wears look like a moth-eaten garment. So Job charges his Maker, and does not pause to hear what He will reply.
The watching Job resents is doing something in him. It forces him to examine himself, and he reads that as hostility:
William KellyHe asked only for a break from suffering, and that God's dread would not overwhelm him. He wanted to find out everything that was wrong in himself. He did not yet know the grace that was giving him self-judgment. He sees only a record kept of bitter things: his feet put in the stocks, his ways watched, the very soles of his feet marked.
This line is not left behind. Later in the book Elihu repeats it almost word for word (Job 33:11). Set beside Job's claim of innocence, it exposes a contradiction:
C. H. MackintoshHe was so clean, so innocent, so free from iniquity. And yet he says of God, "He finds occasions against me, He counts me for His enemy. He puts my feet in the stocks and watches all my paths." Here is an obvious contradiction. How could a holy, just, and righteous Being count a pure and innocent man His enemy? Impossible. Either Job was deceiving himself, or God was unrighteous.
The complaint was no slip of the tongue, so it could not be left alone:
Samuel RidoutElihu does not misrepresent Job, and he is not seizing on some chance expression. Such charges must be met, and Job convinced that they are false, or he could never have peace in his own soul, and a dark stain would rest on God's honour.
Job's facts are right: God does watch every path. His reading of God's motive is wrong:
Numerical Bible Notes"He never withdraws His eyes from the righteous." Even a Job might find this a painful trial rather than a gain in his time of distress. He cried out in his anguish, "What is man, that You make so much of him, and that You set Your heart on him, visit him every morning and test him every moment?" But Job, with all his outward perfection, had not yet seen God as he was to see Him... How blessed it is, once we have truly seen Him, to know that every step we take matters to Him!
- Watched — God marks every path, even the heels a man thinks no one sees. On the facts, Job is right.
- Misread — Job reads that attention as a jailer's watch. He says God has shamed him in public, like a prisoner in the stocks.
- Defended — behind the complaint sits a robe of righteousness Job is not yet willing to let go.
- Unrecognised — the very pressure forcing him to examine himself was grace at work, and he could not yet see it.
- Answered — Elihu quotes the line back to Job. The charge had to be met, or Job could never have peace and a stain would rest on God's honour.
One who, as a rotten thing consumeth, as a garment that the moth eateth.
Job has stopped arguing with his friends. He now speaks to God, and asks why God treats him as an enemy. The chapter ends with no answer — only a picture of quiet ruin, something rotting away, something eaten through. Who is this wasting figure?
Job wanted his own wrongs named, and he could not see why God pressed him so hard. One writer traces how the speech reaches this line:
William KellyHe wanted to find out all that was wrong in himself. He begged to know why God drove him back and forth like a leaf or dry stubble. He did not yet know the grace that was giving him self-judgment. He sees only a record kept of bitter things. He sees himself made to inherit the sins of his youth. God puts his feet in the stocks, watches his ways, and marks the very soles of his feet. And all the while he was only wasting away like a rotten thing, or a moth-eaten garment.
The second image turns on a detail of ancient life. Cloth was wealth, and people stored it:
Morrish Bible DictionaryThis is the clothes-moth, whose damage is well known. In the East garments were kept in large quantities, as property and as gifts. Moths do not attack clothing that is worn; they lay their eggs in what is laid up, and there the young find their food. From this comes the lesson to lay up treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust can spoil or destroy.
The moth ruins what people hoard and guard. Job describes a slow, hidden loss that nothing stops.
Older versions read this line as "he wastes away" — Job speaking about himself. The ESV reads "Man," and the words hold true both ways:
Leslie M. GrantVerse 28 is true of all mankind. But Job was thinking of himself as decaying, and complaining about it. Sin belongs to the nature we received from Adam. We cannot escape the decay it brings, and that decay ends in death.
The moth-eaten garment carries a second meaning. It is the robe of righteousness Job believes he is wearing:
Samuel RidoutAnd yet at once he renews his charges against God. He is not yet ready to lose the righteousness he imagines he has. God holds him as an enemy. He drives him like a withered leaf before the wind. He charges him with those almost forgotten sins of youth (ah, Job, it seems that even you must admit there have been sins). He watches him, and makes his imagined robe of righteousness look like a moth-eaten garment. So Job accuses his Maker, and does not pause to hear what He will reply.
Job never claimed to be sinless. His mistake was smaller and far more common:
William KellyDid he say there was no sin in him? He never said anything of the kind; he never had the presumption to say, "I am clean in your eyes." No, far from it. Unfortunately he had rested in being clean in his own eyes, and in the eyes of other people. But he had to learn that being clean in God's eyes was a very different thing. He begins to learn that more and more deeply… "You watch closely all my paths; you set a mark on the soles of my feet." You might think the soles of the feet are hidden. But no — God marks everything. "And he, like a rotten thing, wastes away, like a garment that is moth-eaten."
This is where the first round of the argument ends. One writer names the note it ends on:
Samuel RidoutThis address closes the first round of the debate. Its ending is a most beautiful song of mourning over the frailty and uncertainty of human life. Man comes up like a flower, and is cut down and withers. We are listening to the wail of Psalm 90, but without its faith in God, and not yet followed by the triumph of Psalm 91.
- Decay — Two pictures, one point: something rots, something is eaten through. Both show a loss that works from the inside, where no one can stop it.
- Moths — Moths ruin what is stored, not what is worn. They feed on the treasure we guard most.
- Everyone — Job means himself, but the words fit all of us: a nature inherited from Adam, and a decay that ends in death.
- Robes — The garment the moth eats is also the righteousness Job has defended all chapter. God is letting him see how it looks under His eye.
- Answer — Job ends in a lament with no answer yet — Psalm 90's wail without Psalm 90's faith, and not yet Psalm 91's triumph. The cry is real; the reply is still coming.