Job 13:1–5

Job 13:1

Lo, mine eye hath seen all [this], mine ear hath heard and understood it.

These words open Job's reply to his three friends. He has already seen and heard everything they are telling him. So if Job knows as much as his comforters do, where can he take his case instead?

Job Answering His Friends on Their Own Ground

Eliphaz had argued from what he had watched happen in the world. Job answers that he has watched the same world:

Eliphaz had based his condemnation of Job on what he himself had observed. Well, Job too had powers of observation. He had seen all these things he had just spoken of, as he says in the opening verses of Job 13. He did not claim to be superior to his friends, but at any rate he was not their inferior. Yet he admitted that God's dealings mystified him. They were far above him and out of his sight.

F. B. Hole

Familiar Truths Turned Into a Weapon

The friends are not simply wrong. They take what everyone already knows and turn it into evidence against Job. One commentator compares them to doctors who fix the diagnosis first:

Next, Job boldly charges his friends with being false witnesses for God. They used well-known truths, familiar to everyone, to back up their charge that Job was wicked. What kind of physicians were they to treat a case like this? They have decided what his disease is, and they misrepresent his symptoms to confirm their diagnosis!

Samuel Ridout

True Things Without the Truth

The friends knew the same facts Job did. That knowledge did not help them reach him:

They did not know how to present God to Job. As a result, they did not know how to lead Job's conscience into the presence of God. Instead of leading him to self-judgment, they only fed a spirit of self-vindication. They did not bring God into the scene. They said some true things; but they did not have the truth. They brought in experience, tradition, legality, but not the truth.

C. H. Mackintosh

That failure does more damage than plain error. A true statement aimed at the wrong person carries God's authority with it:

Abstract truth is of no use at all to the saints of God. Things that are true, but misunderstood and misapplied, may do more harm than many a thing that is false. Misapplied truth gives the apparent authority of God to an error. That error then carries all the more weight, because it comes as the truth. If someone says a foolish thing, or one that is clearly false, people dismiss it; but no believer can brush aside the truth of God.

William Kelly

Knowledge That Could Not Find God

Job has matched his friends point for point. Now he asks for someone else to hear him — God Himself:

But now he says (Job 13), "Behold, my eye has seen all this" — you have been boasting of what the ancients all thought — "my ear has heard and understood it. What you know, I also know; I am not inferior to you. But I would speak to the Almighty, and I desire to argue my case with God." That is just what he was doing. But how? He did not know. There was no New Testament yet. There was no One to stand between God and man, as Christ does. So he did not know how to get to Him. If he could only find Him; if he could only be before Him! He knew very well what he would find there — a faithful God.

William Kelly

From Hearing About God to Seeing Him

Here Job's ear has heard. By the end of the book his eye has seen, and that change is what the suffering gained him:

A greater knowledge of God Himself enriched Job, for he said, "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you." In these words he contrasted two kinds of knowledge. His former knowledge had been by report only. What he had now gained came by direct sight. He had, if we may put it this way, exchanged second-hand knowledge for knowledge of a first-hand kind. Before, he knew about Him; now he knew Him.

F. B. Hole

One writer reads Job's long argument as the thing that held this off. Job's own mind kept working instead of waiting:

Job did look up. But his own mind was at work inside him. Instead of waiting for God to come in and explain everything, Job put himself on show and prolonged the furnace and the trial. But God did come in, and Job learned.

G. V. Wigram

Summary

- Heard — Job had seen and heard it all already. His friends' speeches told him nothing new.

- Familiar — they took truths everyone knew and bent them into proof of Job's guilt. They were doctors fitting the symptoms to a diagnosis already chosen.

- Misapplied — a true statement aimed at the wrong case does more damage than a plain lie. It borrows God's authority for an error.

- Unreached — knowing about God gave Job no way to Him. He wanted to speak to the Almighty, and no one yet stood between God and man.

- Seen — the trial ended when hearing became sight. Second-hand report gave way to knowing God Himself.

Job 13:2

What ye know, I know also I am not inferior to you.

Job has been listening to Zophar, the third of the three friends who came to comfort him and instead accused him. Verse 2 is his answer: they tell him nothing he did not already know, and the question he most wants answered still stands.

An Answer to Zophar

Job's claim comes at the end of a long speech where he described God's power and wisdom himself. He knows the material his friends are lecturing him with.

Job has spoken at length of God's wisdom and power. Now he tells Zophar that his eye has seen all this, and his ear has heard it and understood it. What Zophar knew Job knew also: he was not inferior to his critics (vv.1-2). In fact, what Job has said proves he knows more than they do. So his words in verse 2 are an understatement.

Leslie M. Grant

Where had Job learned it? Not from them. He had the same two teachers they did, and they had taught him well.

He had said in the previous words that he was not an ignorant man. He fully understood everything his wise friends had told him. Both nature and history had taught him the greatness of God that they kept stressing. What you know, I also know; I am not inferior to you. I am just as good as you are. What he desires is not to speak with them but to the Almighty; he wants to reason with God.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

The Measure of the Claim

Job's wording is careful. He does not put himself above them. In the same breath he admits that the thing he most wants explained is still beyond him.

Eliphaz had based his condemnation of Job on what he himself had observed. But Job could observe too. He had seen all these things he had just spoken of, as he states in the opening verses of Job 13. He did not claim to be better than his friends, but he was certainly not beneath them. Still, he admitted that God's dealings puzzled him. They were far above him and out of his sight.

F. B. Hole

Shared Knowledge, Useless Comfort

If both sides know the same things, knowledge was never the issue. The friends had settled on a verdict and bent the evidence to fit it.

Next, Job charges his friends with being false witnesses for God. They used well-known truths, familiar to everyone, to back up their charge that Job was wicked. What kind of physicians were they to treat a case like this? They have decided what his disease is. Then they misrepresent his symptoms to fit their diagnosis! And they bring in their theory that God always punishes sin in this life, to prove that Job is a sinner! Job turns from them in disgust (Job 13:1-5). And poor Job himself is the victim of the same false theory. He is in danger of blasphemously charging God with injustice.

Samuel Ridout

From Arguing with Men to Reasoning with God

Verse 2 clears the ground for verse 3. Job turns from his friends and asks for God — but he had no idea how such a meeting could happen.

But now he says (Job 13), "You have been boasting of what the ancients had all thought" — "Surely I would speak to the Almighty, and I desire to reason with God." That is just what he was doing. But how? He did not know. There was not the New Testament yet. There was not One to stand between God and man, like Christ. So he did not know how to get at Him. If he could only find Him; if he could only be before Him! He knew very well what he would find there — a faithful God. But somehow there were difficulties and riddles between God and his soul that he could not understand.

William Kelly

Hearing About God and Seeing Him

Job rests his case here on what his ear has heard. By the end of the book he sets that against something else, and the difference measures everything he gained.

Job gained a greater knowledge of God Himself, for he said, "I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you." In these words he contrasted his old knowledge, which came by report only, with the knowledge he had now gained by direct sight. He had, if we may so put it, exchanged knowledge acquired at second hand for knowledge of a first-hand sort. Formerly he knew about Him but now he knew Him.

F. B. Hole

Summary

- Heard. Job's ear had already taken in everything his friends were telling him. Nature and history had taught him the greatness of God they kept repeating.

- Equal. He claims no superiority — only that he is not beneath them. Commentators note the claim is an understatement of what he had just proved.

- Useless. Shared knowledge healed nothing. They fixed the diagnosis first and bent his symptoms to fit it, which left them useless as physicians.

- Beyond. Job admits one thing is still out of his sight: God's dealing with him. So he turns from his friends to ask for God, not knowing how a man could reach Him.

- Seen. What finally changed him was not more information but a first-hand sight. He had known about God; at the end he knew Him.

Job 13:3

But I will speak to the Almighty, and will find pleasure in reasoning with щGod;

Job has just told his three friends that he knows all they know. Their arguments have not touched his case. So he turns from the debate and asks for a hearing with God Himself. That wish raises two questions: was Job right to want it, and how could a suffering man reach God at all?

Turning from the friends to God

Job does not claim to know more than his friends. What baffles him is God, not their arguments. So he asks for a different conversation partner.

He did not claim to be better than his friends, but he was certainly not beneath them. Still, he admitted that God's dealings mystified him. They were far above him and out of his sight. So, as verse 3 shows, he wanted to speak to the Almighty and reason with God. He did not want to spend his time reasoning with his friends.

F. B. Hole

The name "the Almighty"

The title Job reaches for has a history. It is the name by which God made Himself known to earlier generations.

Notice how "the Almighty" appears freely in the speeches of Job and his friends, alongside "God" itself. That name is how God revealed Himself to the fathers. As a rule, the writer uses the name Jehovah only when he is describing events himself, or introducing God as the speaker.

William Kelly

A right desire with no road to God

Job wants to argue his case with God. But wanting a hearing and knowing how to get one are two different things.

"But I would speak to the Almighty, and I desire to argue my case with God." That is just what he was doing. But how? He did not know. The New Testament did not exist yet. There was no One to stand between God and man, like Christ. So he did not know how to reach Him. If only he could find Him! If only he could stand before Him! He knew very well what he would find there — a faithful God. But somehow there were difficulties and riddles between God and his soul that he could not understand.

William Kelly

Why the friends were no help

Job asks to speak with God right after he gives up on his friends. Their fault was not bad information, but bad use of it.

Job charges his friends with being false witnesses for God. They took well-known truths that everyone accepted and used them to prove that Job was wicked. What kind of doctors were they, to treat a case like this? They have decided what his disease is, and they twist his symptoms to fit their diagnosis! … Job turns from them in disgust (Job 13:1-5). … Poor Job, he is a victim of the same false theory. He is in danger of blaspheming by charging God with injustice.

Samuel Ridout

Even doubts belong in God's presence

Job's speech is not calm. He argues and accuses. Yet where he takes his complaint is worth copying.

He doubts God's ways and accuses Him. Yet he is sure that if he could only see Him, everything would be cleared up. … It is all a strange contradiction. Still, this longing to come before God is far better than pride. Pride says to Him, "Depart from us! We do not desire the knowledge of your ways." It is always better to bring even our doubts about God to Himself, if we have nothing else to bring.

Samuel Ridout

The gap Job could not close

Later in the chapter Job asks God to lift His hand and His terror, so that he can bear to speak. That plea shows what Job lacked — and what God has since given.

But how dare he speak before the One he would flee from by instinct? Let God at least remove the awful dread that chills Job's heart and relieve his pain. Then he will answer Him or speak to Him. These words are beautiful even in their anguish. They cry out for the blessed Mediator, the One who stands between God and man! Blessed be God! We can "with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need." Job could only grope in the dark.

Samuel Ridout

God answered him

Job got what he asked for. God did speak with him, and the meeting left Job a changed man.

"Now my eye sees you." This was nothing outward now; no distant rumour. … He was dealing with God Himself, who used it all for that very purpose, and so turned Job from everything to Himself.

William Kelly

Summary

- Speak past men. Job's friends could not explain his suffering. So he turned from them and asked to speak with God.

- Speak to the Almighty. The title he uses is the name by which God made Himself known to earlier generations, and it runs through the whole book.

- Speak honestly. Bringing doubts and complaints to God is better than the pride that tells Him to keep His ways to Himself.

- Speak through a Mediator. Job had no one to stand between God and man. That gap is now filled, and we can draw near to God's throne with confidence.

- Speak, and God answers. God did meet Job, and the meeting turned him away from himself and his arguments to God.

Job 13:4

For ye indeed are forgers of lies, ye are all physicians of no value.

Three friends have explained Job's suffering to him. He answers with two blunt names for them: they invent lies, and as healers they are useless. Can men say true things about God and still be wrong? Does God accept a defence of Himself built on a false charge?

Healers Who Made the Wound Worse

Job calls them physicians. They came because they had heard he was ill. A healer is meant to leave the sufferer better than he found him.

He says, "Worthless physicians are you all." You came to heal me. You had heard of my terrible state. You came to heal and cure me in my dreadful sickness and suffering — and what have you done? You have poured poison on my wounds. You have poured no wine, no oil. You have poured no balm on the poor sufferer.

William Kelly

Israel had a Physician who never failed them.

The LORD Himself was the physician of His people Israel, ready at all times to heal and restore them (Jeremiah 8:22). Job, in the bitterness of his soul, found his friends to be physicians of no value. They did not understand his case, and only added to his misery (Job 13:4).

Morrish Bible Dictionary

The False Diagnosis

The friends are not ignorant of true things. Job's charge is forgery: they take real material and shape it into a lie about him.

Next, Job boldly charges his friends with being false witnesses for God. They used well-known truths, familiar to everyone, to confirm their charge that Job was wicked. What kind of physicians were they, to treat a case like this? They have decided what his disease is, and they misrepresent his symptoms to confirm their diagnosis! And they bring in their theory that God always punishes sin in this life, to prove that Job is a sinner!

Samuel Ridout

Their reasoning started in the wrong place.

All their arguments were founded on man and on the world. Everything a believer stands on is what is in God, and what God gives and reveals. And there we find it, in all its perfection, in Christ. But they were resting on man's thoughts and man's experience.

William Kelly

Right Words, Wrong Man

Their failure was not a lack of information. They did not know God's ways, and they did not know the man in front of them.

They did not truly understand God's character, so they could not understand His dealings with a soul. They had no proper sense of sin. So they did not know this: if God is to deal in blessing with man, it must be entirely on the ground of grace. They did not know how to meet his case. They had said many true things, yet not one single right thing that applied to Job, because they did not understand him.

J. N. Darby

Lying on God's Behalf

The friends were not simply mistaken. They claimed to speak on God's behalf.

They were speaking wickedly on God's behalf, using deceit in claiming to speak for God. Job knew that God was fully aware that the charges of his friends were not true. So God was certainly not backing them up. Job knew that God was not deceitful, as his friends were proving to be. When the time came, God would search them out and would surely rebuke them. … Men should deeply fear to misrepresent God, whose glory is so high above the heavens.

Leslie M. Grant

God does care about His own honour. That is exactly why such a defence fails.

God does not accept honour at the expense of truth. It is His glory that all His attributes blend in one harmonious light. Can He then accept a defence of His character and ways that rests on a false charge? Can He let it brand a man as wicked and hypocritical? Of that same man He Himself had said, "There is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil." … What then becomes of His testing of His own, and of the sanctifying effect of chastening?

Samuel Ridout

The Verdict at the End of the Book

Job's charge is not just one man's bitterness. The book ends by settling who was right.

The LORD speaks to Eliphaz, the leader of the three. He declares His wrath against them all, because they had not spoken of Him what is right, as His servant Job had. And yet their whole argument had apparently been for God's righteousness! Had they not held to this from the very start, with many a noble description and many a fierce condemnation of evil? Had they not fastened the charge of wrongdoing on Job, despite a total lack of proof and against well-known facts to the contrary? Zealous for God's honour — that had been their one theme.

Samuel Ridout

Summary

- Diagnosis — The friends decided in advance what Job's disease was. Then they misread his symptoms to fit their theory: suffering always proves wickedness.

- Forgery — They did not invent their material. They took well-known truths and bent them into a false charge against an innocent man.

- Poison — Men who came to heal poured poison into the wound instead of balm, so Job named them healers of no value.

- Misrepresentation — They spoke for God without knowing His character, His grace, or the man they were treating.

- Verdict — Untruth never honours God. In the end He rebuked the zealous defenders and cleared the man they accused.

Job 13:5

Oh that ye would be altogether silent! and it would be your wisdom.

Job has just called his three visitors forgers of lies and worthless physicians. Now he tells them the kindest thing they could do is stop talking. When a friend is suffering and we cannot explain why, does our talking help him or hurt him?

Physicians who made the wound worse

The picture behind Job's words is a sickbed. Men came to treat a case they had already decided, and the treatment made things worse.

"You are all physicians of no value." You came to heal me. You had heard of my terrible state. You came to heal and cure me in my dreadful sickness and suffering. And what have you done? You have poured poison on my wounds. You have poured no wine, no oil. No balm have you poured on the poor sufferer.

William Kelly

Job wanted something else from them, and he kept pressing his request through the chapter.

Still, there his friends were, and by this time they had goaded Job into sharper retorts. What he wanted was truth for his mind and healing for his body. He advised them to keep quiet and listen to what he had to say, and he kept on in this way up to verse 13.

F. B. Hole

A diagnosis that bent the evidence

The charge in verse 4 is not that the friends said false things about God in general. They said true things and used them wrongly.

Job boldly charges his friends with being false witnesses for God. They used truths everyone knew to back up their charge that Job was wicked. What kind of physicians were they, to treat a case like this? They have decided what his disease is. They misrepresent his symptoms to confirm their diagnosis! And they bring in their theory that God always punishes sin in this life, to prove that Job is a sinner! Poor Job — he is the victim of the same false theory, and is in danger of blasphemously charging God with injustice.

Samuel Ridout

Why silence would have been wisdom

Job ties their silence to wisdom. One writer reads this as a rule for anyone, not just a jab at three men.

"Oh that you would keep silent, and it would be your wisdom!" And it often is a man's wisdom when he sits quiet and holds his tongue. But the moment he begins to speak about what he does not understand — well, what then? That is exactly where they were.

William Kelly

Speaking for God without being sent

Job's next move is to warn them. Claiming to defend God is a serious business, and the One being defended is watching.

They were speaking wickedly on God's behalf, using deceit in claiming to speak for God. Job knew that God was fully aware that the charges of his friends were not true. So God was certainly not backing them up. God was not deceitful, as his friends were proving to be. When the time came, God would search them out and would surely rebuke them.

Leslie M. Grant

Talk that only enlarged the quarrel

Their words did not close the case. They opened it wider, and one writer draws a caution from it.

The three friends failed to convince Job. Their ministry was one-sided. Instead of silencing Job, they only led him out into a field of discussion that seemed almost boundless. He gives them word for word, and far more… No doubt the friends were wrong, quite wrong. But their being wrong did not make Job right. If Job's conscience had been in the presence of God, he would have made no reply to his friends, even if they had been a thousand times more mistaken and severe.

C. H. Mackintosh

Where Job takes his case instead

Cut off from human help, Job looks past the three men in front of him.

Job did not claim to be better than his friends, but he was not below them either. Still, he admitted that God's dealings puzzled him. They were far above him and out of his sight. So, as verse 3 shows, what he wanted was to speak to the Almighty and reason with God, instead of spending his time reasoning with his friends.

F. B. Hole

Getting to God was the problem.

But how could he reach God? He did not know. There was no New Testament yet. There was not One to stand between God and man, like Christ. So he did not know how to get at Him. Yet he knew very well what he would find there — a faithful God.

William Kelly

Summary

- Wound. They came as healers to a suffering man, and poured poison on his wounds instead of oil and balm — no comfort, no cure.

- Diagnosis. They had settled what his disease was. Then they bent his symptoms to fit it, using true statements to prove a false charge. Job was caught in the same false theory.

- Presumption. They argued as if they spoke for God, but He had not sent them. Job warns that God would search them out and rebuke them.

- Silence. It is often a man's wisdom to sit quiet and hold his tongue. The danger starts the moment he speaks about what he does not understand.

- Result. Their talk never silenced Job. It drew him into an endless argument and drove him past his friends to lay his case before God. Yet their being wrong did not make Job right.