And Job answered and said,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
Truly ye are the people, and wisdom shall die with you!
Zophar has just spoken to Job with great certainty, as if he held wisdom Job lacked. Job answers with sarcasm so sharp that his words have outlasted the argument. Two questions follow: what made him speak this way, and was he right to?
Job's tone answers Zophar's tone. One writer traces the sarcasm back to Zophar's certainty:
F. B. HoleZophar's speech was full of extreme dogmatism, and that no doubt prompted Job to begin his reply on a very sarcastic note. His words, "No doubt you are the people, and wisdom will die with you," have almost passed into a proverb, used against the dogmatism of self-conceit.
Zophar had not simply disagreed with Job. He had claimed insight that Job did not have. The sarcasm aims straight at that claim:
Leslie M. GrantJob's reply to Zophar was understandably sarcastic, "No doubt you are the people, and wisdom will die with you!" (v.2). Zophar had implied that he had an inborn wisdom that Job lacked. Job rightly reproved him: "But I have understanding as well as you; I am not inferior to you" (v.3). In fact, Zophar had said only what was common knowledge: everyone knew these things.
After the mockery of verse 2 comes a careful claim in verse 3. Job does not answer superiority with superiority:
William KellyJob answers in the next chapters (12-14) and no doubt he repays them too much in their own coin. Well, they deserved that rebuke. "But I have understanding as well as you." Here he was far more considerate than they were, because he did not take the place of being superior. "I have understanding as well as you" — "I am not inferior" — he does not say, "I am superior" — "I am not inferior to you."
The friends' speeches were not false. They were useless. They repeated the obvious to a man in agony:
H. L. RossierIt is astonishing to see how little discernment Job's friends showed at that time. But are we today more intelligent than they were? Do we not often judge before the time? Do God's children not often judge by appearances, despite the solemn warning, "Judge not, that you be not judged"? No wonder Job answers with biting irony, "No doubt you are the people, and wisdom will die with you!" What was the use of reciting truisms in flowery language? Such speeches brought neither comfort nor light to the sufferer.
Kelly says the same. The friends were "only talking platitudes, moral platitudes, that every person of the slightest acquaintance with God already knew." They "did not contribute one atom" to the real question: why a God-fearing man fell under such sorrow.
Commentators differ on how to weigh the words. Kelly holds that the friends deserved the rebuke, though Job paid them back too much. Another writer looks at what the pain had done to Job:
Samuel RidoutStung by the charges and platitudes of the friends, Job meets them with bitter sarcasm, followed quickly by the charge of their mocking him. They are at ease, while cherishing their unjust suspicions of him. He almost compares them to robbers, who hold their booty undisturbed (verses 1-6).
Writers have long turned the verse back on the reader. The danger is self-importance, and it shows in how we speak about other believers:
W. W. FeredayLet us note this principle well, for it is greatly needed in this day. Self-inflation — being taken up with our own faithfulness in testimony — breeds critical feelings in our hearts toward the people of God around us. It also puts us right out of the place of intercession with God for them. Need we be surprised, also, if our improper airs draw out from others the sarcastic remark, "No doubt you are the people, and wisdom will die with you" (Job 12:2)?
The answer is not to claim we know nothing. What light we have is a gift:
James BoydNone of us can boast of being the people with whom wisdom shall die. Still, God in His grace was pleased to give us a little light. We should thank Him for every ray He has been willing to send into our souls. We should seek His grace to make good use of the light we have received. Only then will we be able to ask for more with confidence.
- Cause. Zophar's dogmatism provoked the sarcasm. He implied he held wisdom Job lacked, yet he said only what everyone knew.
- Claim. Job answers superiority with restraint. He says "not inferior," never "superior." The friends deserved the rebuke, though he paid them back too much.
- Emptiness. True platitudes brought the sufferer no comfort and no light. They added nothing to the real question of his suffering.
- Mirror. The words are now a proverb against self-conceit. Self-inflation breeds a critical spirit and stops us praying for the people we judge.
- Cure. No one owns wisdom. Receive every ray of light as grace, use it well, and then ask for more.
I also have understanding as well as you; I am not inferior to you; and who knoweth not such things as these?
Job has just listened to Zophar, who spoke as if wisdom belonged to him alone. Here Job's irony turns into a plain claim: he is not the ignorant man his friends assume, and nothing they said was new.
The verse answers one person in particular. Zophar had just finished speaking:
Leslie M. GrantJob's reply to Zophar was sarcastic, and you can see why: "No doubt you are the people, and wisdom will die with you!" Zophar had implied that he had a natural wisdom Job lacked. Job was right to correct him: "But I have understanding as well as you; I am not inferior to you." In fact, Zophar had said only what was common knowledge: everyone knew these things.
The exact wording matters. Job could have matched their boasting and did not:
William Kelly"But I have understanding as well as you." Here he was far more considerate than they were. He did not put himself in the higher place. "I have understanding as well as you" — "I am not inferior." He does not say, "I am superior." He says, "I am not inferior to you." "Who does not know such things as these?" They were only talking platitudes, moral platitudes, that anyone with the slightest knowledge of God already knew. They gave no light on the very difficult question. How could a devout, God-fearing man fall into such terrible sorrow and suffering? They did not add one atom to that question.
Job's complaint is not that the friends were wrong, but that they were obvious. He had already thought it all through:
H. L. RossierWhat was the use of reciting truisms in flowery language? Such speeches brought neither comfort nor light to the sufferer. "Who does not know the same?" asks Job. He then shows that he had thought their questions over carefully long ago. He can develop them in all their variety — not in a one-sided way, as Zophar did.
The claim of equal understanding does not stand alone. It runs straight on into an accusation about the comfortable position his friends were speaking from:
Samuel RidoutThe charges and platitudes of the friends sting Job. He meets them with bitter sarcasm, and then charges them with mocking him. They are at ease, while holding on to their unjust suspicions of him.
Job can speak about the greatness of God as well as any of them. That ability has a limit:
C StanleyHe too can speak well about the majesty of God in all His ways. But this cannot settle the question: how can a man who is a sinner be just before God? A man may speak well about the stars and the stones. He may have all the learning of this world. Yet he may still be unable to say clearly how God justifies the sinner.
The friends could not explain Job's suffering. Their failure did one thing they never intended:
The Bible TreasuryThey could not understand why such a perfect and upright man as Job should be tried so hard. So, after seven days of silence, their hints and false charges drove that patient man to cry out in bitterness of soul, "Miserable comforters are you all." They might have helped in an ordinary case. But here an outstandingly righteous man had lost every earthly possession in a way never seen before, and their tongues were dumb. They did not understand God's ways with His own at all. So they made Job feel how completely unable they were to help him, and threw him back on God Himself.
- Provocation. Zophar spoke as though wisdom were his alone. Job's sarcasm is the answer to that.
- Parity. Job claims only equality — "I am not inferior," never "I am superior." He refuses the very pride he is rebuking.
- Platitude. The friends offered common knowledge in fine language. It gave no light on why a God-fearing man was suffering.
- Powerlessness. A man may speak well about the majesty of God and still not be able to say how God justifies a sinner.
- Purpose. Their inability to help was not wasted: it threw Job back on God Himself.
I am to be one that is a derision to his friend, I who call upon +God, and whom he will answer a derision is the just upright [man].
Job's friends have charged him with sin and answered his pain with platitudes. Here he names what has happened to him: the sufferer has become the joke, and the prayers God once answered are thrown back at him.
There is an order to Job's reply. It starts with how the friends' words landed on him.
Samuel RidoutStung by the charges and platitudes of the friends, Job meets them with bitter sarcasm, followed quickly by the charge of their mocking him. They are at ease, while holding on to their unjust suspicions of him. He almost compares them to robbers who keep their stolen goods undisturbed.
The middle clause is the sharpest part of the verse. Job once called on God, and God answered him. His friends now repeat that fact back to him as a sneer.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinYou mock me; I am nothing but a laughingstock. You as my neighbours come to me and say, "He calls on God, that He should answer him." Yet I am the just, the perfect man; you make sport of me. You are at ease and treat the one who is down, overwhelmed by misfortune, with contempt.
Commentators differ on how the clause is best read. One translation keeps it as Job's own settled memory rather than the friends' taunt — something God actually did for him in the past:
William KellyA mockery to his neighbours am I, / One calling on God, and He heard him: / The just, upright, one a mockery!
Job keeps his claim to integrity even while they laugh at him. His friends strip that integrity from him and claim to speak for God while they do it.
Leslie M. GrantJob felt the sadness of his friends mocking him and ridiculing him, though he was just and blameless (v.4). He had been a lamp, giving light. Now these friends despised him in their thoughts. They were comfortable and at ease, and ready to put down those whose feet slip. He even suggests that his friends were acting like robbers who were prospering, since they were stealing away his integrity and provoking God while pretending to speak on God's behalf.
Nothing had gone wrong in the lives of the three men sitting opposite Job. That comfort is what let them sit in judgment on him.
William KellyThat phrase exactly described the situation. These three men were all at ease. Nothing was wrong with them. God had not taken them up, as He had Job, and allowed the devil to do all the evil he could... "The man ready to slip with his feet" — that is what Job felt he was — "is like a lamp despised in the thoughts of a man at ease." If he gives way, what good is the lamp? A lamp needs to be held steady, and a slipping man cannot hold it. It waves and waves down into the mud. But they were all at ease, sitting in judgment on him.
Job's complaint goes deeper than the mockery. Their speeches were true in general and useless in particular.
William KellyThey were only talking platitudes — moral platitudes that anyone with the slightest knowledge of God already knew. They gave no light at all on this very difficult question: how could a devout, God-fearing man fall under such crushing sorrow and affliction? They did not contribute one bit to that question.
- Stung, then sarcastic — the friends' charges and platitudes wounded Job first. His sarcasm came out of that wound, and then he named their mockery.
- Prayer turned into a joke — God once answered Job when he called. His friends now throw that same fact back at him with contempt.
- Integrity stolen — they ridicule a just and blameless man, steal his integrity, and provoke God while claiming to speak for Him.
- Ease breeds contempt — nothing was wrong with the three. A slipping man looked to them like a lamp not worth holding, so they judged him from comfortable ground.
- True words, no light — their platitudes were already common knowledge. Not one touched the real question: why did a God-fearing man fall under such sorrow?
He that is ready to stumble with the foot is a lamp despised in the thought of him that is at ease.
Job has been listening to three friends explain his ruin to him, and in chapter 12 he turns on them with sarcasm. Verse 5 is his sharpest look at human nature: comfort breeds contempt for the man whose feet are slipping.
Zophar had just spoken, and his certainty set Job's tone.
F. B. HoleZophar spoke with such extreme certainty that it no doubt prompted Job to begin his reply on a very sarcastic note. His words, "No doubt you are the people, and wisdom will die with you," have almost become a proverb, used against the man whose self-conceit makes him sure he is right. He claimed to have understanding equal to his friends. In verse 5 he reminded them that he stood in this slippery place, shining like a warning lamp, while men in easy and comfortable circumstances — his friends — despised him.
Older translations end the verse with "a lamp despised," and writers differ over what that lamp is. One reads it as Job himself: a light that once shone, now written off by comfortable men.
Leslie M. GrantJob felt the sadness of it. His friends mocked and ridiculed him, though he was just and blameless (v.4). He had been a lamp, giving light. Now these friends, comfortably at ease, despised him in their thoughts. They were ready to put down those whose feet slip.
Another reads it as a lamp made useless: a shaking hand cannot hold a steady light.
William KellyThey were all at ease, these three men. Nothing was the matter with them. They had not, like Job, been taken up by God, who then let the devil do all the evil he could. "He who is ready to slip with his feet" — that is what Job felt he was — "is like a lamp despised in the thought of the man who is at ease." Why? A lamp needs to be held steady. If a man is slipping with his feet, what good is his lamp? It waves about and sinks down into the mud. But they were all at ease, sitting in judgment on him.
The contempt sits in the mind of the man who is not suffering. One writer retells Job's complaint as if he spoke straight to his visitors.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinYou mock me; I am nothing but a laughingstock. You as my neighbours come to me and say, "He calls on God, that He should answer him." Yet I am the just, the perfect man; you make sport of me. You are at ease and treat the one who is down, overwhelmed by misfortune, with contempt.
Their comfort had another side: quiet suspicion of him.
Samuel RidoutThey are at ease, while nursing unjust suspicions of him. He almost compares them to robbers, who keep their loot undisturbed.
Contempt was not their only option. A friend owes a sufferer pity, and there is a reason for it.
Samuel RidoutFriends should show pity to a sufferer. That is a basic principle. Otherwise, under the stress of trial — as some have translated it — "he should forsake the fear of the Almighty." … But the hard principle these friends were applying knew no mercy and felt no sympathy. In his hour of desperate need they proved completely unfit to be friends. They are not the "brother born for adversity." … Yet he had asked nothing unreasonable of them — no money, no rescue from the enemy, only a little sympathy.
The danger in the verse belongs to whoever is safe right now. God notices those who add to the load of a man He is disciplining.
J. G. BellettWe deceive ourselves if we think we must be right when we grieve those whom God is disciplining. This is often very far from being the case. The Lord said in Zechariah, "I am very angry with the nations that are at ease; I was only a little angry, and they made the affliction worse." … We are more often, perhaps, in God's mind, and acting as living vessels of the Spirit, when we comfort such people. And I am sure it was so in Job's case. Had his former friends known God's way, they would have dealt very differently with him.
- Ease — The verse looks at the comfortable man, not the crushed one. Contempt sits in a mind that nothing has touched yet.
- Contempt — His friends were at ease, nursing unjust suspicions. Job almost calls them robbers who enjoy their loot in peace.
- The lamp — Writers read the picture two ways. Job is a light that once shone and is now despised — or a lamp is useless because the hand holding it slips.
- Pity — A sufferer needs sympathy, or the strain may drive him to give up the fear of the Almighty. Job asked for that alone and got none.
- Warning — Grieving someone God is disciplining is not proof you are right. God said He was angry with those at ease who made the affliction worse.
The tents of desolators are in peace, and they that provoke щGod are secure; into whose hand +God bringeth.
Job's friends keep telling him that God rewards the good and ruins the wicked. Here Job points at the world as it is, where violent men often go unpunished and live well. So what does prosperity actually prove? (Older translations read "the tabernacles of robbers prosper... into whose hand God bringeth abundantly." The writers below quote that wording.)
The friends worked from a fixed principle: reward here, ruin there. Job answers with a counter-example.
F. B. HoleIn verse 6 Job challenged the main position that his friends had taken. They said that God always rewards good people with prosperity in this life, and always brings disaster on the wicked. Job said it was not so. There were cases where robbers prospered and where those who provoked God were secure.
The word "secure" has an edge. Job's three visitors are comfortable men, and that comfort feeds their theory.
Samuel RidoutThe charges and empty sayings of the friends sting Job. He answers with bitter sarcasm, and then charges them with mocking him. They are at ease, while they hold on to their unfair suspicions of him. He almost compares them to robbers, who keep their loot undisturbed (verses 1-6).
The line is not an abstract complaint. History already knew such a man.
William KellyThere had been that great robber Nimrod. He first began to hunt beasts, and then to subdue men for his own purposes. God gave him no authority to do it. And yet God allowed it. Nimrod built great cities and became a great man. "The tents of robbers prosper, and those who provoke God are secure; into whose hand God brings abundantly." That is the present state of the earth. Any state of the earth since man fell is no adequate proof of what God thinks of people. It is not bringing out His judgment of men yet. God may deal with a particular case now and then. But that is an exception. His ordinary way is to leave things, to all appearance, to run their own course. And that is just why a judgment must come. Things have not been judged according to God, but they will be.
Job does not stop at human society. The same pattern runs through the animal world.
William KellyJob meets the theory that God repays everyone in this life with a direct denial and disproof. And this was not limited to man. Every form of living nature declares the same fact. The beasts of the earth, the birds of the air and the fish of the sea all show that the violent get the better of the weak. God is sovereign. For that very reason their law of government is a false argument, and to apply it to him is unjust.
Job is not the only one troubled by this. The riddle is not solved by collecting more facts.
A. PridhamFaith finds the answer to the painful riddle of human affairs in the secret of God. That answer does not come from studying facts. It does not come from long experience of God's apparent dealings as the Governor of the world. Power is His alone, and He is the only and the righteous God. Yet weigh events and the actual state of human society by the light of divine truth. Nothing is more constantly obvious than this: everywhere the world appears to reverse the known and eternal principles of divine government. "The tents of robbers prosper, and those who provoke God are secure" (Job 12:6). Evildoers go unpunished now. Truth is continually crushed, and its servants are often persecuted. In every age this has tested the faith and patience of God's saints (Jeremiah 12:1; Habakkuk 1:1-4).
Job knew a fact that Eliphaz's rule had no room for.
An Outline of Sound WordsJob knew that the tents of robbers prosper and that those who provoke God are secure (Job 12:6). But Eliphaz thought that "in prosperity the destroyer shall come upon" the wicked (Job 15:21). What Eliphaz thought was sometimes right, but not always. The writer of Psalm 73 knew that, and we know it from what is all around us. God has allowed Satan to become the god and prince of this world. Satan has authority to dispose in some way of the kingdoms of this world (Luke 4:6). Once we realise this, we will not be perplexed at the prosperity of the wicked.
- Observation. Job states a plain fact: robbers live undisturbed, and men who provoke God feel safe. It answers the friends' rule that God always pays the good and punishes the wicked in this life.
- Challenge. God is sovereign, and for that very reason their rule of government is a false argument. Applying it is unjust.
- Witness. Beasts, birds and fish repeat the message: the violent get the better of the weak.
- Reason. The world since man fell is no measure of what God thinks of anyone. His occasional dealings are the exception, not the rule.
- Verdict. Things have not been judged according to God, so a judgment must come. Until then the riddle tests faith and patience, as Psalm 73, Jeremiah and Habakkuk show.
But ask now the beasts, and they shall teach thee; and the fowl of the heavens, and they shall tell thee;
Zophar has just lectured Job on the greatness of God. Job answers with sarcasm, and points him to the animals, the birds, the earth and the fish. The invitation to "ask the beasts" is no gentle nature meditation. It is an argument, and commentators read what the creatures teach in more than one way.
Job aims his appeal to the animal world straight at the friend who has just lectured him.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinThis is also in answer to Zophar's argument. Zophar had spoken of the greatness of God. The wisdom which Zophar had tried to impress upon him is so elementary that the beasts themselves know something about it.
One reading takes the animals as Job's evidence, and the evidence is grim.
William Kelly"But ask now the beasts" — there is something triumphant here. "Why," he says, "the very beasts know more than you, and prove more than all your speeches!"… That is, the whole creation — God's lower creation on the earth — is a proof that things are not yet according to God. Do they not prey on one another? Do not the great swallow up the small? And is not man the one who deals death to beasts and birds and fish, and everything else, for his own pleasure? I do not mean only for food, but to please himself at all costs.
Commentators differ here. Others hear Job beating Zophar at his own subject. He calls the creatures as witnesses to the Creator's power.
Leslie M. GrantHe proceeds then, in verse 7, to show far more than Zophar did, the greatness and wisdom of God. He appeals to creation, the beasts, the birds, the earth, the fish as witnesses of the great variety of actions of power and greatness on the part of the Creator. "The hand of the Lord has done this" (v.9).
Both readings meet at the same place. The hand behind it all is God's, and Job presses that on the friends themselves.
Leslie M. GrantIn that hand of power, Job says, is the life of every living thing and the breath of all mankind — not only his own breath, but his three friends' breath too. He would not let them think of themselves as detached onlookers, free to judge others while no one judged them.
Some read this verse as a standing invitation to learn from the created world.
Frederick W GrantNature itself, even more fully than the Old Testament, is an object lesson, a divine picture-writing, a teaching by type. It surely is. We may not yet hold the full key to it, but in every age its lessons have been taught and learnt — most simply, perhaps, in the earliest ages. As we grow older we lose the unsuspecting faith of childhood, which in many respects is the truest wisdom.
Asking the animals takes a person only so far.
C. H. MackintoshThe unbeliever may tell us that God is to be known in creation. Did anyone ever find Him out there? No doubt creation does prove the existence of a Creator. The first chapter of the letter to the Romans says: "For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse." Creation gives a testimony the nations were bound to receive. Had they received it, a higher light would certainly have shone on them. But they did not receive it. Instead they worshipped the things that were made, rather than the One who made them. Philosophers talk of rising from nature up to nature's God. But nature is a ruin, and man himself is a ruin inside that ruin. Instead of rising to nature's God, he makes a god of nature, and sinks below the level of a beast.
- Sarcasm. Job's opening move is sharp. What Zophar called deep wisdom about God is so basic that animals could teach it.
- Witnesses. Job calls beasts, birds, earth and fish into court. Commentators differ on the verdict. Some hear them proving that the world is not yet as God means it to be. Others hear them declaring the Creator's power.
- Hand. Both readings end in the same confession. This is God's doing, and He holds the breath of every creature — and every critic — in His hand.
- Book. The created world is God's second book — an object lesson whose lessons have been taught and learnt in every age.
- Limit. The creatures can convict, but they cannot introduce. They leave a person without excuse; they never, on their own, bring anyone to know God.
Or speak to the earth, and it shall teach thee; and the fishes of the sea shall declare unto thee.
Job is answering Zophar. Instead of arguing back point for point, he sends his friends to the animals, the birds, the ground and the sea to learn. That raises two questions. What do the creatures know that his friends do not? And can nature teach us about God on its own?
Job is answering a claim his friends had made about how God runs the world.
F. B. HoleIn verse 6 Job challenged the main position that his friends had taken. They said that God always rewards the godly with prosperity on earth, and brings disaster down on the wicked. He said it was not so. There were cases when robbers prospered, and men who provoked God were safe. As proof he pointed to what anyone can see in the lower creation — beasts, birds and fishes. He was pointing, we suppose, to the disorder that man's sin has brought in even there. The weaker meet disaster and destruction from the stronger, and all of this happens by God's permission.
The lesson the creatures give is not a comforting one.
William KellyThe whole creation — the lower creation of God on the earth — is a proof that things are not yet according to God. Do they not prey on one another? Do not the great swallow up the small? And is not man the great dealer of death to beasts and birds and fishes, and everything else, for his own pleasure? I do not mean merely for food, but to please himself at all costs. In short, it is not merely what the Lord allows, but man makes it serve his lusts, his luxury, everything except God.
Job's confidence that the earth can teach a man is not poetic exaggeration.
Frederick W GrantScripture being witness, however, nature does teach. "For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made." (Rom. 1:20.) "The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork." (Ps. 19:1.) The work must declare the Craftsman. And the Worker, we are assured, is He who is called the "Word of God" because He is the Revealer. (John 1:1-3.) So creation must be part of this revelation.
If the earth teaches, why not learn from it and leave the Bible aside? Because nature teaches in parables, and a parable does not settle doctrine.
Frederick W GrantNow, if this is true, as it surely is, the continuity of Nature and Revelation is assured. It does not mean, as one writer suggests, that the book of nature is the simpler to read, the surer to follow, and therefore the more authoritative. The opposite is true. For if nature teaches by parable, no parable is the first authority on doctrine. Its importance is still hard to exaggerate. But it leaves Scripture as the one place where God speaks to us "face to face."
Commentators differ on how well Job handles his own evidence. One writer sees a real danger in where Job's argument lands.
Samuel RidoutCreation — in earth and air and sea — will confirm him in witnessing that God is everywhere and does everything. His conclusion from this, however, leads him dangerously near charging God with being the author of evil. If he means only that God is all-powerful, everyone would agree at once. But the words that follow show his gloomy mind and distorted view dwelling on the dark side of nature. It is in this that his danger lies.
The disorder Job points to has a cause and an end. Man dragged the creatures down with him.
W. W. FeredayMan's sin has not only brought ruin on himself. It has spoiled his home and dragged down all the creatures that depend on him... God made man, unlike angels, the centre of a system of things. The whole of this lower creation either suffers or rejoices with its head. This is its time of suffering. "For we know that the whole creation has been groaning together in the pains of childbirth until now" (Rom. 8:22)... When Christ comes, bringing with Him the whole glorified family of God, creation will be set free. Its bondage to corruption will give way to the freedom of the glory of the children of God.
- Ask. Job does not offer a better theory. He tells his friends to go and look: the ground and the sea are witnesses they never called.
- Hear. Their witness is that things are not yet as God intends. The strong devour the weak, and man kills for pleasure — all by God's permission.
- Learn. Creation is real revelation, because the Maker is the Revealer. His power and divine nature show in the things He made.
- Check. Nature teaches by parable, so it cannot settle doctrine alone. Scripture is where God speaks to us face to face.
- Wait. Job read the dark side alone and came close to blaming God. That same groaning creation is waiting to be set free with the children of God.
Who knoweth not in all these, that the hand of Jehovah hath wrought this?
Job has just heard Zophar lecture him on the greatness of God. He answers with sarcasm — the beasts already know what his friends call deep wisdom — and with a hard question: if God's hand has done all this, what does the state of the world say about Him?
Job's friends held a simple rule: God rewards the good with comfort and strikes the wicked with disaster. Job disputes the rule, and points to the animal world as his evidence.
F. B. HoleIn verse 6 Job challenged the main position his friends had taken. They said that God always rewards godly people with prosperity here on earth, and brings disaster down on the head of the wicked. Job held that it was not so. There were cases where robbers prospered and men who provoked God were left secure. As proof he pointed to what can be seen in the lower creation — beasts, birds and fishes. He meant, we suppose, the disorder that man's sin has brought in even there, so that the weaker meet disaster and destruction from the stronger — and all of this by God's permission.
Job's reply is aimed straight at Zophar.
Arno C. GaebeleinThis is also in answer to Zophar's argument. Zophar had spoken of the greatness of God. The wisdom which Zophar had tried to impress upon him is so elementary that the beasts themselves know something about it.
Job calls witnesses that cannot even speak.
William KellyThe fish of the sea have practically no voice, and do not know how to talk — yet they too will declare it to you. That is, the whole creation — the lower creation of God upon the earth — is proof that things are not yet according to God. Do they not prey upon one another? Do not the great swallow up the small? And is not man the great dealer of death to beasts and birds and fishes, and everything, for his own pleasure? I do not mean merely for food, but to please himself at any cost. In short, it is not only what the Lord allows: man makes it serve his lusts, his luxury, everything except God. … "Who among all these does not know that the hand of the LORD has done this?" He cannot deny that the Lord has left it in this way.
One detail here is easy to miss: which name of God the verse uses.
William KellyNotice how "the Almighty" (how God had revealed Himself to the fathers) appears freely in the speeches of Job and his friends, as well as "God" as such. The writer uses "Jehovah" only when he is describing God, or introducing Him as speaking. The one exception is in Job 12:9.
The name is not just another word for God. It speaks of relationship, and it is the name used when God Himself speaks in the book.
William KellyYou will notice that this name has not appeared after Job 2 (except in Job 12:9) in the historical part. But now, before the history itself closes, the book brings Him in again. We have Him speaking with His authority and in His relationship — that is exactly what "Jehovah" means. This is not God in the abstract, but God in relation to man on the earth.
Job is right that God's hand is behind everything. The danger is what he does next with that truth.
Samuel RidoutCreation — in earth and air and sea — will back him up as he witnesses that God is everywhere and does everything. The conclusion he draws from it, however, brings him dangerously near to charging God with being the author of evil. He would appeal to age and experience to confirm it. If he means only that God is all-powerful, everyone would agree at once. But the words that follow show that his gloomy mind and distorted view are dwelling on the dark side of nature. That is where his danger lies.
When God Himself answers, He asks Job about the same creation Job had called as his witness.
Samuel RidoutThey are not so much a revelation of truth as a question to Job, asking whether he knows the truths that lie all around him in the vast creation of God. That is what makes these words of Jehovah so wonderful. He speaks, not "in a tongue no man can understand," but in the language of nature — about the earth, the sky, the clouds and rain, and beasts and birds.
- The taunt. Job answers Zophar's grand talk of God's greatness by sending him to the beasts. They already know what his friends called deep wisdom.
- The witness. Creation teaches what his friends refuse to hear. The strong devour the weak, the world is not yet as God means it to be, and so far God has left it that way.
- The name. One word lifts the verse: "the LORD." It is the only place that name appears in the whole debate, and it means God in relation to man on the earth.
- The drift. Job's starting point is sound, but his conclusion slides. Dwelling on the dark side of nature brings him near to blaming God for evil, and that is where his danger lies.
- The answer. God replies in the language of nature Job had appealed to. He asks whether Job understands the creation lying all around him.
In whose hand is the soul of every living thing, and the spirit of all flesh of man.
Job's friends insist that suffering always proves guilt. He answers by pointing to the animals, the earth and the sea. Every creature alive holds its life at God's disposal. Few verses say so plainly that life is not owned but only held. The harder question is whether Job says it in worship or in protest.
Job begins this argument back in verse 6.
F. B. HoleIn verse 6 Job challenged the main position that his friends had taken. They said that God always rewards godly people with prosperity here, and brings disaster on the wicked. He said this was not true. There were cases where robbers prospered, and where people who provoked God were safe. To prove it he pointed to what we can see in the lower creation — beasts, birds and fishes. He was pointing, we suppose, to the disorder that man's sin has brought in even there. The weaker meet disaster and destruction from the stronger, and God permits all of it.
Job tells his friends to ask the animals. What they show is a world not yet running the way God will have it.
William Kelly"Why," he says, "the very beasts know more than you, and prove more than all your speeches!"… The whole creation — the lower creation of God upon the earth — is a proof that things are not yet according to God. Do they not prey on one another? Do not the great swallow up the small? And is not man the great bringer of death to beasts, birds and fishes, and to everything else, for his own pleasure?… "In whose hand is the soul of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind" — and yet He allows them to break forth in this lawless way.
Job uses two different Hebrew words in one line. Older translations show this by reading "soul" where the ESV reads "life."
The Christian's FriendOther passages in the Old Testament show us that soul and spirit were not confused. They were known and kept apart… Job also contrasts soul and spirit. The first belongs to every living thing. The second is found in man alone. He asks, "In whose hand is the soul (nephesh) of every living thing, and the breath (rooagh) of all mankind?"
If God holds animal life and human breath alike, what makes the human case different? Commentators trace it back to how man received life in the first place.
William KellyGod did not only put the rest of the animal kingdom under man here below. Man alone also had his life direct from above. "The LORD God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature." No other animal became a living soul in this way… This is why man alone stands in direct moral responsibility to God. He must give account for the things done in the body to the God who gave him his soul and spirit in this way.
(The older translation Kelly quotes reads "man became a living soul.")
The statement itself is true. But commentators note that Job is pressing it in a direction that begins to accuse the One who holds the breath.
Samuel RidoutCreation — in earth and air and sea — will confirm him in witnessing that God is everywhere and does everything. His conclusion from this, however, leads him dangerously near charging God with being the author of evil… If he means only that God is all-powerful, everyone would agree at once. But the words that follow show his gloomy mind and distorted vision are dwelling on the dark side of nature. It is in this that his danger lies.
Away from the debate, the verse tests an assumption most people live by.
J. T. MawsonMen delight in the thought that they are independent of God, but it is a delusion, they are not, for in Him we live and move and have our being. He is the faithful Creator, giving to all life and breath, and all things. His mercies preserve us. Every breath of our nostrils and every throb of our feeble hearts is by God's power and ordering.
Another writer turns the verse on the reader as a warning: "'And the God in whose hand your breath is'… 'Your breath' too is in His hand. The little string of life only has to break, and you pass from time into eternity." (W. T. P. Wolston)
- One hand. Job's whole case rests on one fact. Every creature's life and every person's breath sit in God's hand, not their own.
- Creation testifies. Ask the animals and the friends' tidy rule falls apart. The strong devour the weak, and God allows it. So suffering today is no proof of guilt.
- Two words. "Soul" covers every living thing. "Breath" belongs to mankind alone. Job marks the difference with two words.
- One responsibility. Man alone received life breathed from God. So man alone must give account to Him for what he does in the body.
- One warning. Job held this truth bitterly and came close to blaming God. Hold it humbly instead. Nobody lives a day free of the hand that holds the string of life.
Doth not the ear try words, as the palate tasteth food?
Job is answering friends who explain his suffering with confident theories. He replies with a proverb about testing: who decides whether words are true, and what happens when the taster himself is unwell?
The line pairs two senses. Later in the book another speaker quotes it back and calls his hearers to test what they hear for themselves:
Samuel RidoutQuoting Job's own words (Job 12:11), which seem to be in the form of a proverb, he reminds his hearers that the ear is the way words are received and tested, just as the mouth is for food. So let them go with him in his search into whether Job's charges are true or false. In the same way our Lord appealed to His hearers, "And why do you not judge for yourselves what is right?" and the apostle says, "I speak as to sensible people; judge for yourselves what I say."
In Job's mouth the saying is a retort. His friends have talked to him as if he could not weigh a word they said:
William Kelly"Does not the ear test words?" — do you think I cannot hear? — "and the mouth taste its food?" — that I cannot discern with my own palate?
Job is not only claiming the ability to test. He also reports the result:
F. B. HoleIn verse 6 Job challenged the main position his friends had taken. They claimed God always rewards the godly with earthly prosperity and brings disaster on the wicked. He insisted it was not so. There were cases where robbers prospered and those who provoked God were secure. To prove this he pointed to what can be seen in the lower creation — beasts, birds and fishes. He meant, we suppose, the disorder that man's sin has brought even there, so that the weaker meet disaster and destruction from the stronger, and all of it by God's permission. Just as the mouth tastes food, so his ear had tested their words, and found them worthless.
The proverb assumes a healthy taster. Take that away and the method fails. One writer answers people who use this very verse to defend their own judgment:
James BoydSomeone may reply that the ear tests words, as the mouth tastes food. I admit that in Job 12:11 the comparison is not only allowable but intended. But suppose the health of the judge is bad, and his taste is therefore spoiled. He may want food that is unwholesome, he may call bitter sweet, and sweet bitter; he may call evil good, and good evil. What then? Where is his ability to judge? He may turn to his neighbour to decide for him. But suppose everyone he knew was suffering from the same illness — then no one could help him in the slightest.
The same writer names the leading symptom of this sickness, then asks the question that settles everything:
James BoydOne symptom of this sickness — and the leading one — is that the sick person is always absolutely sure his taste is excellent, and quite able to decide for himself between truth and error. No one can talk him out of it. But where is the standard of truth, by which we may judge what is put forward in this world of many voices? If we have no standard of truth to bring the opinions of men to, we must fall back on our taste. And if our taste is spoiled, our case is indeed hopeless, as far as our natural resources go.
One writer sees a danger in Job's reasoning here. Job appeals to creation and to the wisdom of age, but his own view of God is clouded:
Samuel RidoutCreation — in earth and air and sea — will back him up in witnessing that God is everywhere and does everything. His conclusion from this, however, brings him dangerously close to charging God with being the author of evil. He would appeal to age and experience to confirm it. If he simply means that God is almighty, everyone would agree at once. But the words that follow show that his gloomy mind and distorted vision are dwelling on the dark side of nature. That is where his danger lies (vv. 7-13).
- Ear. The verse is a proverb: the ear takes in and tests words the way the mouth takes in and tastes food.
- Test. Testing is expected of us. The Lord asked His hearers why they did not judge for themselves what is right, and the apostle told his readers to judge what he said.
- Verdict. Job had already done it. His friends said prosperity proves godliness. His ear tested that claim and found their words worthless.
- Palate. The comparison only holds if the taster is healthy. A spoiled palate calls bitter sweet and evil good, and a whole society can share the same illness.
- Standard. So taste alone cannot be the final court. Without a standard of truth outside ourselves, we fall back on a palate that may already be sick — and the sickest taster is the surest of himself.
With the aged is wisdom, and in length of days understanding.
Job is answering Zophar with an edge, telling his friends that they are the whole people and that wisdom will die with them. Then he grants the very proverb they leaned on — wisdom belongs to the aged — before setting it against something far greater.
One writer traces Job's sarcasm back to Zophar's certainty:
F. B. HoleZophar spoke with extreme dogmatism, and that no doubt prompted Job to begin his reply on a very sarcastic note. His words, "No doubt you are the people, and wisdom will die with you," have almost become a proverb, used against the dogmatism of self-conceit.
Job has just said that the ear tests words as the mouth tastes food. He claims the right to weigh what he hears, and this saying about age is one of the things he weighs:
Leslie M. GrantGod's hand of power holds the life of every living thing, Job says. It holds the breath of all mankind too — not only his own breath, but that of his three friends. He would not let them think of themselves as detached onlookers, free to judge others without being judged themselves. With his ears he tested their words, and he tasted what was fed to him, to discover whether it was palatable or not. So he sets Zophar's claimed wisdom aside by telling him: "Wisdom is with the aged, and understanding in length of days."
Job does not sneer at age. He gives the proverb its due, and one writer sees that as a mark of his fairness:
William Kelly"Does not the ear test words?" — do you think I cannot hear? — "and the mouth taste its food?" — that I cannot use my palate? "Wisdom is with the aged." There again he shows how little he was inclined to condemn where there was wisdom. He allows that with the aged there is wisdom — "and in length of days understanding" — because there is experience that nothing else can give.
The very next verse moves the subject to God. In man, wisdom and strength pull apart; in God they do not:
William Kelly"With Him is wisdom," he says. He turns to God; for, after all, a man profits only a little. "With Him is wisdom and strength" — while the aged man grows weaker as he grows wiser — "He has counsel and understanding."… "He leads counsellors away stripped, and makes the judges fools." No doubt those counsellors and judges were noted for their knowledge, and people took them for wise men too. But there is always a limit in this world, and there is often disappointment where you most rest.
Older translations read "the ancient" here. The word describes a stage of life, not an office:
Truth & TestimonyThe ancients in this verse are men of long experience. We must not think that these ancients are the same as the New Testament elders. An ancient in Israel was simply a wise old man with long experience. An elder in the New Testament is a brother in Christ who has the Holy Spirit living in him. Of course, an older believer today may not be as spiritually wise as a younger one. But the older one certainly has more experience. Wisdom in the sense of spiritual intelligence joined with spirituality is not always tied to age or long experience.
The book itself puts this saying under pressure. Elihu is a young man, and he holds back before men much older than himself:
C. H. MackintoshNo doubt it may often happen, as in the case of Job and his friends, that old men say very foolish things. Grey hairs and wisdom do not always go together. It often happens that aged men rely on the mere fact of their years and take a place for which they have no power at all — moral, intellectual, or spiritual… None of that touches the fine moral feeling in Elihu's opening words: "I am young, and you are very old; that is why I was afraid, and did not dare to show you my opinion." This is always right.
The practical use of the verse is not to arm one generation against the other:
William KellyIt is folly and blindness to set young against old. Better to help the young profit from an experience of great value that they lack. Let the old admire the energy of the young, and let the young acknowledge the beauty of the grey head.
- Weigh it. Job tests words the way the mouth tastes food. This proverb is something he weighs, not a verdict he swallows whole.
- Grant it. He allows the truth in it, because long years bring an experience nothing else can give.
- Limit it. Human wisdom grows as strength fails. In God, wisdom and strength stay together, and He can make the reputed wise look foolish.
- Define it. "The aged" means men of long experience, not office-holders. Years alone do not guarantee spiritual understanding.
- Use it. Grey hairs and wisdom do not always travel together. Even so, the young should honour the grey head, not set themselves against it.
With him is wisdom and might; he hath counsel and understanding.
Job's friends have argued that his suffering proves his guilt. He answers by turning away from their reasoning and pointing to God Himself. He says that wisdom, strength, counsel and understanding all belong to God. Writers agree the words are true. They also say Job showed only one side of them.
His friends had spoken as men sure of their own insight. Job first turns their appeal to age and experience back on them.
Leslie M. GrantWith his ears he tested their words. He tasted what they fed him, to find out whether it was good or not (vv.10-11). So he sets Zophar's claim to wisdom aside by telling him that "wisdom is with aged men, and with length of days, understanding" (v.12).
The verse before grants that long life brings wisdom. This verse moves the subject to God, where wisdom and strength are held together. In a man, they never grow together.
William Kelly"With God are wisdom," he says. He turns to God; for, after all, a man gains only a little. "With God are wisdom and might" — while an old man grows wiser, he grows weaker — "he has counsel and understanding."
The verses that follow show this wisdom and strength in action. What God pulls down stays down. What He shuts stays shut. Job says this without seeing that he is himself the broken man.
Leslie M. Grant"If He breaks a thing down, it cannot be rebuilt" (v.14). In fact Job had been broken down, but he did not realise that the One who broke him down could also rebuild him, though Job could not do it. If God imprisons one, man cannot release him, though God can do so.
Job's next lines describe advisers and judges losing the very thing that makes them useful. These are the people a society leans on.
Leslie M. Grant"He leads counsellors away plundered, and makes fools of the judges." That is, He strips counsellors of the value of their counsel. So man's wisdom comes to nothing, and the judges become foolish. Man's authority becomes as useless as his wisdom. Men that others counted dependable lose their speech and their power to help. Even elders known for their experience find their good sense taken away (vv.17-20).
These reversals break the theory Job's friends were pressing on him: what happens to a man now shows God's verdict on him.
William KellyThere are all kinds of change. So there is nothing here that shows the settled judgment of God. Everything among men keeps flowing and changing. Nothing, then, could be more foolish than the basis of the three friends' attack on Job.
Job's teaching here is sound. His choice of evidence is not. He states the truth about God's wisdom and might, then illustrates it only from the side of ruin.
Arno Clemens GaebeleinIn verses 12-13 Job seems to have Bildad's statement in mind (8:8-9). He now declares that with God are wisdom and might; He has counsel and understanding. But what follows is only one side of God's doings. It is true in itself, yet it is the darkest pessimism, which suited his mind.
Faith holds the same facts and speaks in a different tone.
Samuel RidoutIt is indeed a great but very dark picture of God's power. We can only shudder at the dreadful sight. Job's misery has cast a grim light over all God's greatness. How different is the language of faith: "God is our refuge and strength … therefore we will not fear … Be still, and know that I am God" (Ps. 46).
Admitting that God is wise and mighty does not settle Job's case. It turns him away from the debate and toward the One he cannot explain.
F. B. HoleHe did not claim to be better than his friends, but he was certainly not below them. Yet he admitted that God's ways puzzled him, being far above him and out of his sight. So, as verse 3 shows, what he wanted was to speak to the Almighty and reason with God, instead of spending his time reasoning with his friends.
- Wisdom moves — Job grants that age carries wisdom, then lifts the subject higher. With God, wisdom and strength go together. In man, they pull apart.
- Wisdom acts — God's counsel is not theory. He breaks down and it stays broken; He shuts and no one opens.
- Wisdom empties — counsellors lose the worth of their counsel. Judges become fools. Trusted men lose their speech. Man's wisdom and authority fail together.
- Wisdom overturns the argument — everything among men keeps shifting. So today's circumstances prove nothing about God's verdict. The friends' whole case falls.
- Wisdom needs faith's tone — Job's statement is true, but he paints it only in shadow. Faith sees the same greatness and finds refuge, not dread. It drives Job to reason with God rather than with men.