The word that came to Jeremiah from Jehovah, after that Nebuzar-adan the captain of the body-guard had let him go from Ramah, when he had taken him, being bound in chains, among all the captivity of Jerusalem and Judah, that were carried away captive to Babylon.
Jerusalem has fallen. The prophet who warned of it now stands in a line of chained captives at Ramah, and God's word reaches him there, at the moment his chains come off.
This verse opens a new part of the book. What follows is no longer prophecy about a coming fall. It is the story of the people left behind after it.
In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we have the anarchy and moral disorder that prevailed among the Jews who were left behind in the land or its vicinity when most of their fellow countrymen had been carried captive to Babylon. Jeremiah becomes their helper, ministering to them the word of the LORD, but finds among them the greatest unbelief.
Nebuchadnezzar himself had ordered Jeremiah's protection. Yet the prophet ended up in irons among the captives bound for Babylon.
Nebuchadnezzar had given special orders about Jeremiah: "Keep an eye on him and do him no harm; but do for him whatever he asks of you." The captain of the bodyguard takes him out of the court of the guard. Yet, through some unexplained mistake, he is bound with chains and found among the captives being transported to Babylon.
Nebuzaradan then tells Jeremiah why the city fell. The LORD had warned of this disaster and has now brought it, because the people sinned. One writer warns us not to mistake that speech for faith.
It is easy to admit the truth once a prophecy has come true. Even a man with no part in God's blessing for His people can do it — especially when it raises him above his fallen enemies. Nebuzaradan can talk piously once his master had gained the victory over Jerusalem, just as the LORD had declared. Here is the confession: He had warned, and at last carried out His word, and this because of their sins.
With the chains off, Jeremiah faces a real choice: comfort in Babylon, or hardship at home.
Jeremiah is now reaching the end of his public ministry. He is probably at least sixty years old. Two choices are placed before him. He may go to Babylon. There he can enjoy the king's favours. There he will find his friends Daniel, Ezekiel and other captives taken away earlier. And there he can spend the rest of his life in relative quiet. On the other hand, he may remain with the poor of the land in Palestine and carry on a ministry among them.
He stayed. He went to Gedaliah at Mizpah and lived among the people who were left in the land.
But Jeremiah had no heart for Chaldea, whatever attractions might seem to be there. He preferred to suffer in the land with the lowest of those whom men had left behind... It was love to remain in the scene of their humiliation; it was a pledge of restoration.
One writer applies the same choice to a small, unimpressive gathering a believer might be tempted to leave.
He prefers to stay with the poor of the people of God in their poverty rather than enjoy the favours of the king of Babylon. Perhaps there is not much to attract a person in one's own meeting — not many spiritual gifts, not an abundance of warm fellowship. If, however, the Lord through His presence fulfils His promise to be in the midst of two or three gathered to His name, is that not the place where one should stay, and, leaning on Him, try to add some spiritual blessing there?
The people left in the land were in the right place. The chapters that follow show how they behaved.
Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must somehow have better qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only leave us open to bad behaviour and to hypocrisy, as is illustrated here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully. Calling on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety.
- Chains — the king's orders protected Jeremiah, yet he ended up bound among the captives. At Ramah, God's word reaches him.
- Released — the chains come off, and a new section of the book opens: the story of those left in the land.
- Confession — a foreign officer names the true reason for the ruin. But admitting a prophecy after it comes true costs nothing.
- Choice — comfort in Babylon or poverty at home. Near the end of his life, the prophet chose the poor of the land.
- Love — staying in the scene of their humiliation was love, and a pledge of restoration. Yet the right place is no substitute for the right heart.
And the captain of the body-guard took Jeremiah, and said unto him, Jehovah thy God pronounced this evil upon this place,
A foreign officer stands in the ruins of a city his own army has just destroyed. He turns to a prisoner and tells him why it fell. His answer is the same message Jeremiah had preached, and the same message Jerusalem refused. The words are true. But the mouth they come from raises a question the commentators press: does admitting that God has spoken make a man God's own?
The speaker is Nebuchadnezzar's top commander. The hand that broke Jerusalem is the hand that unlocks Jeremiah's chains.
He was captain of the guard, the commander in chief of Nebuchadnezzar's army at the capture of Jerusalem, and later at its destruction. He set Jeremiah free from his chains. He told him that God had brought all this destruction on Jerusalem because the people had sinned against Jehovah and had not obeyed His voice. He let Jeremiah go wherever he wanted.
Jeremiah was a protected prisoner by Nebuchadnezzar's own command. Something then went wrong.
Nebuchadnezzar had given special orders about Jeremiah: "Keep an eye on him and do him no harm; treat him just as he asks you to." The captain of the body-guard takes him out of the court of the guard. Yet by a mistake no one can explain, he ends up in chains among the captives on their way to Babylon.
The officer calls the LORD Jeremiah's God, not his own. And the confession costs him nothing: the ruin he describes is his own side's victory.
We see from this how easy it is to own the truth once a prophecy has come true. It is easy even for a man who has no part in God's blessing for His people. It is easier still when it exalts him over the enemy who has fallen. Nebuzaradan can talk piously once his master had gained the victory over Jerusalem according to the declaration of the Lord. He admits that God had warned, that God carried out His word in the end, and that this came because of their sins.
The contrast with Jeremiah's own countrymen is sharp.
But while Jeremiah laboured and testified, he had the bitter lot of finding his worst enemies among those he loved and pitied and rebuked so strongly. Their refusal to believe Jehovah's word came from their rebellion of will against Jehovah Himself, as it always does, whatever men say or boast. Nebuchadnezzar and his servants shone in honouring Jeremiah. They stood in sharp contrast to the priests, the false prophets, and even kings Jehoiakim and Zedekiah.
The officer calls the fall of the city God's doing, not Babylon's. Jeremiah had told them the same thing, and told them what to do about it.
But the question was, What had God said? God told His prophet Jeremiah that the only path of safety and the only path of honouring Him was to submit to the king of Babylon. The king of Babylon might be very wicked. But God's people were wicked too. God gave them into the hands of the king of Babylon as a judgment on their evil.
Accepting that verdict is where faith and unbelief part.
Jehovah meant their exile to be for their eventual good. This is a very important point. In a day of ruin faith always recognises the chastening of God and bows to it. Unbelief always resists, and counts it patriotism or perhaps religion to oppose.
The officer reports it as history. God had said it in advance, down to details no one could have arranged.
The case of Zedekiah is perhaps even more astonishing, because of how exactly the puzzling details came true. God plainly foretold that He would hand Zedekiah over, with the city and the people, to Nebuchadnezzar — and that is what happened. There was nothing obscure in that, though it was solemnly true. There was nothing puzzling either in Jeremiah's words to Zedekiah: the city would be burned with fire, and his eyes would see the eyes of the king of Babylon. No doubt, once the words came true, they would speak with a loud voice to Zedekiah. The reference to his eyes, made so often, must have made him feel afterwards that he had stood in the presence of One who knows everything, when he heard, but did not heed, the words of the suffering prophet.
- Spoken — God announced the disaster long before Babylon marched. The word came first, the army second.
- Verified — the word came true down to the details, so those who ignored it had to face a God who knew everything in advance.
- Confessed — even a foreign commander could say it plainly, because owning a prophecy costs nothing once it has come true.
- Refused — the people who had the word rejected it; their unbelief was rebellion of the will, not a lack of evidence.
- Received — faith bows to God's chastening, which He meant for their eventual good. Unbelief resists and calls its resistance loyalty.
and Jehovah hath brought [it about] and done according as he said; for ye have sinned against Jehovah, and have not hearkened unto his voice, therefore this thing is come upon you.
Jerusalem has fallen. The prophet who warned the city now stands in chains among the prisoners bound for Babylon. The commander who burned the city turns to him and explains the disaster in the prophet's own terms. Why can a foreign soldier say what Judah would never accept?
The speaker is the officer who led Nebuchadnezzar's army at the fall of the city:
Captain of the guard, or commander in chief of Nebuchadnezzar's army at the capture of Jerusalem, and afterwards at its destruction. He released Jeremiah from his chains. He told him that God had brought all this destruction on Jerusalem, because the people had sinned against the LORD and had not obeyed His voice. He gave Jeremiah liberty to go where he pleased.
How Jeremiah ended up in chains at all is a puzzle, since the king had given orders for his safety:
Nebuchadnezzar had given special orders about Jeremiah: "Keep an eye on him and do him no harm; do for him whatever he asks of you." The captain of the bodyguard takes him out of the court of the guard. Yet, by a mistake no one can explain, he is bound with chains. He ends up among the captives on their way to Babylon.
The officer's words are true. But commentators note how easy such words are once the outcome is clear and you stand on the winning side:
We see from this how easy it is to own the truth after a prophecy comes true. Even a man with no part in God's blessing for His people can do it, especially when the truth lifts him above the fallen enemy. Nebuzaradan can talk like a godly man once his master had won the victory over Jerusalem, just as the Lord had declared. It is confessed that He had warned, and finally carried out His word, and this because of their sins.
The officer names two causes: sin, and refusal to listen. Judah's leaders had heard the way out and treated it as treason:
The Lord meant their exile to be for their eventual good. In a day of ruin faith always recognises the chastening of God and bows to it. Unbelief always resists, and counts it patriotism or perhaps religion to oppose. Jeremiah seemed to the men of Judah to be a very false Jew for this reason. He always advised them to submit to the king of Babylon. They thought themselves much better Jews, because they were willing to fight against the king of Babylon.
Even after the city fell, the same offer stood, and the same refusal followed:
If these survivors had accepted Nebuchadnezzar's rule at this last hour, peace would have reigned in the land. These few who remained would have kept it. There is no thought of trusting in the Lord. They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth.
What the officer confesses is that God said it and God did it. That exactness runs through the whole book:
God's word about King Jehoahaz, or rather "Shallum" (Jer. 22:11-12), came true with solemn precision, and so did His word about King Jehoiakim (Jer. 22:17-19). The case of King Zedekiah is perhaps even more astonishing, because puzzling details came true so exactly.
Jeremiah went free. Commentators point to the hand behind the Babylonian king's orders:
We do not doubt that Nebuchadnezzar knew much of this history. He knew what happened in Jerusalem during the siege. Perhaps he even knew the great messages concerning himself. But it was the Lord who made him act as he did. His loving eye was open above His servant, who had served so faithfully.
And there is a bitter irony in who finally treated him well:
King Zedekiah did not listen to the words of the Lord spoken through the prophet Jeremiah. Neither did his servants or the people of the land (Jer. 37:2). Instead, they put him in prison. He only got his freedom when the city fell. The king of Babylon treated him better than the king of his own people, whom he served so faithfully. This is often the case with true servants of the Lord.
- Said. God announced the disaster through His prophet long before the armies came. His words then came true "with solemn precision," detail by detail.
- Refused. Judah heard the way of escape — submit and live — and called it treason. Unbelief resists God's chastening; faith bows to it.
- Done. The officer's verdict is the whole book in one line: God warned, God acted, and He acted because of their sins.
- Confessed. A man with no share in God's blessing can state the truth once the judgment is over and he stands on the winning side. True words are not the same as a changed heart.
- Kept. The nation lost everything. The one man who had believed God went free, because the Lord moved a foreign king to protect him. His eye was open above His servant the whole time.
And now, behold, I loose thee this day from the chains that are upon thy hand. If it seem good in thy sight to come with me to Babylon, come, and I will keep mine eye upon thee; but if it seem ill unto thee to come with me to Babylon, forbear. See, all the land is before thee whither it seemeth good and right in thy sight to go, thither go.
The man who unlocks Jeremiah's chains is not a fellow Israelite. He is the commander of the army that has just taken Jerusalem. His offer is simple: come to Babylon under my protection, or go anywhere you choose in the ruined land.
The order to treat Jeremiah well came from the Babylonian king himself. One writer traces the kindness back further — past the king, to the God whose eye was on His servant.
And if the poor were remembered, the prophet was likewise treated with great kindness. The Babylonian king commanded: "Take him, and look after him well, and do him no harm; but do to him just as he tells you." Nebuzaradan found the great man of God in the prison. The princes had to come and take him out of the prison house of humiliation. What an exaltation! We do not doubt that Nebuchadnezzar knew much of what happened in Jerusalem during the siege. He may even have known the great messages about himself. But it was the Lord who made him act as he did. His loving eye was open above His servant, who had served so faithfully.
The people who imprisoned Jeremiah were his own. The men who now treat him with respect are the invaders.
Jeremiah laboured and testified. But his bitter lot was this: his worst enemies were among the people he loved and pitied and reproved so deeply. Their unbelief in the Lord's word came from a will that rebelled against the Lord Himself. It always does, whatever men say or boast. Nebuchadnezzar and his servants shone in honouring Jeremiah. What a sharp contrast with the priests, the false prophets, and even kings Jehoiakim and Zedekiah!
Jeremiah was an old man by now, and the two roads in front of him could hardly have been more different.
Jeremiah is now reaching the end of his public ministry. He is probably at least sixty years old. Two choices are placed before him. He may go to Babylon. There he can enjoy the king's favours. There he will find his friends Daniel, Ezekiel, and other captives taken away earlier. And there he can spend the rest of his life in relative quiet. On the other hand, he may remain with the poor of the land in Palestine and carry on a ministry among them. People will probably receive it no better than his earlier prophesying. Even so, on God's part it will still be a last encouragement for these desolate remains of Israel.
Jeremiah turned Babylon down. Kelly says the reason was love, not duty — and that his staying pointed to the land's future.
But Jeremiah had no heart for Chaldea, whatever attractions might seem to be there. He preferred to suffer in the land with the lowest people that men had left behind… Staying in the scene of their humiliation was an act of love. It was a pledge of restoration.
The few left behind had nothing impressive about them. But the ground they stood on mattered.
God shows special favour to Jeremiah. He knows how to deliver His faithful servants in the worst of times (Jer. 39:11-14). Jeremiah has complete liberty to go where he pleases (Jer. 40:1-5). But, gracious and faithful man that he was, he chooses to remain with the poor few who were in the right place (Jer. 40:6). Despite all that had happened, this feeble remnant were in their right place in the Lord's land. Many were drawn to them, sought them out and joined them, and received much blessing (Jer. 40:7-12).
André puts the same open road in front of a young person choosing what to do with life.
Nebuzaradan says to Jeremiah: "See, the whole land is before you; go wherever you think it good and right to go." Doesn't a young man face almost the same situation when he is about to choose a career or a profession? At the end of his high school or college years, various options open up to him. Which is the path that the Lord wants for him? His parents may advise him. An experienced believer may give an opinion. Yet the decision is still the young believer's own, made with the Lord's help: how he will spend the main part of his life.
- Chains — the enemy commander unlocked the prophet's chains. It was the Lord who moved him to do it.
- Contrast — the Babylonians honoured Jeremiah. His own priests, prophets and kings had jailed him.
- Choice — Babylon offered quiet, safety and the company of Daniel and Ezekiel. The ruined land offered a hard ministry among people who would not listen.
- Heart — he had no heart for Babylon. He stayed out of love, and his staying was a pledge of restoration.
- Us — the same open road faces a young believer choosing a career. Others may advise; the choice is ours to make with the Lord.
And while he had not yet given answer; [he said,] Yea, go back to Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan, whom the king of Babylon hath appointed over the cities of Judah, and abide with him in the midst of the people; or go wheresoever it seemeth right in thy sight to go. And the captain of the body-guard gave him provisions and a present, and let him go.
Jerusalem lay in ruins, and Jeremiah — who had warned of it for years — stood in chains among the captives bound for Babylon. The captain of the guard set him free and put two roads before him, and this verse tells us how the prophet chose.
One writer weighs the two roads open to a prophet near the end of his work:
Jeremiah is now reaching the end of his public ministry. He is probably at least sixty years old. Two choices lie before him. He may go to Babylon. There he can enjoy the king's favour. There he will find his friends Daniel, Ezekiel, and other captives taken away earlier. And there he can spend the rest of his life in relative peace. On the other hand, he may stay with the poor of the land in Palestine and serve them there. His ministry will likely be received no better than his earlier preaching. Still, on God's part, it will bring one last encouragement to these desolate remains of Israel.
Older translations open the verse with "while he had not yet given answer" (DARBY). One writer reads that silence as the prophet's answer:
Jeremiah stays silent; "he had not yet given an answer." Nebuzaradan surely expects him to welcome the attractive offer to settle in Babylon with thanks. The prophet's silence tells him the offer is refused. So he urges Jeremiah to go to Gedaliah, or to "go wherever you think it right to go" (40:5). He gives him provisions and a gift, and sends him away. Jeremiah goes to Gedaliah and stays "with him among the people" left in the land. He would rather stay with the poor of the people of God in their deep poverty than enjoy the favours of the king of Babylon.
Another writer names the motive behind the choice, and sees a promise in it:
But Jeremiah had no heart for Babylon, whatever attractions it might seem to hold. He chose to suffer in the land with the lowliest of those left behind… It was love that kept him in the place of their humiliation; it was a pledge of restoration.
The verse names Gedaliah as Babylon's appointed governor. His father had already saved Jeremiah once, and that history shaped how Babylon treated the prophet:
Nebuchadnezzar puts Gedaliah the son of Ahikam over the people left in the land to tend the vines and work the fields. This Ahikam had saved Jeremiah in the days of Jehoiakim, when Jeremiah had prophesied against Jerusalem, as Urijah the prophet had done (Jer. 26:24). No doubt what Ahikam did influenced the king of Babylon, who respected and protected Jeremiah. Gedaliah lived at Mizpah, a fortified city that Asa, king of Judah, had built with the stones of Ramah (1 Kings 15:22).
The chapters that follow show what those left in the land were really like:
Chapters 40-41 expose the mistake of thinking that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some higher standing. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person only opens us to bad behaviour and to godless hypocrisy, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted with deceit.
One writer sets this choice beside other choices in Scripture:
The Word of God speaks of several choices. Abraham is content with whatever land Lot does not want, so he invites his nephew to choose first. Instead of leaving the first choice to his uncle, Lot lifts up his eyes and looks at the plain of Sodom. We know the rest of his life. As for Moses, the letter to the Hebrews confirms that by faith he chose "rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin" (Heb. 11:25)… Mary "has chosen the good portion, which will not be taken away from her," the place at the feet of Jesus.
The same writer applies this to a young person choosing work, to the choice of a wife, and to where a believer settles for fellowship — choices "not made in the head, but in the heart."
- Offer — Babylon set two paths before Jeremiah: comfort and favour there, or hardship among the poor left in the land.
- Silence — He gave no answer, and his silence was the answer; the officer understood, supplied him, and let him go.
- Choice — He had no heart for Babylon. He chose to suffer with the lowliest of those left behind.
- Love — Staying in the place of their humiliation was love. One writer calls it a pledge of restoration.
- Caution — The right place is not enough. Those left in the land were not right with the right Person, and they acted with deceit.
And Jeremiah came unto Gedaliah the son of Ahikam to Mizpah, and abode with him among the people that remained in the land.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And all the captains of the forces that were in the fields, they and their men, heard that the king of Babylon had appointed Gedaliah the son of Ahikam over the land, and had committed unto him men, and women, and children, and of the poor of the land, of them that had not been carried away captive to Babylon.
Jerusalem has fallen, the king is gone, and Babylon has installed Gedaliah over the handful of people left in Judah. Here the news reaches the armed men still out in the open country. What happens next turns on how they answer it.
One commentator reads Jeremiah 40 as the start of a new section. What follows is not recovery but breakdown.
This is the first of a series of chapters. They show the disorder and moral confusion that ruled among the Jews left behind in or near the land. Babylon had carried the rest away captive. Judgment by the hand of man has no softening effect on those who slight the word of God. We shall find that those who would not bow to the Lord's chastening are false and treacherous in how they deal with their brothers.
Babylon handed Gedaliah men, women, children, and the poorest of the land, and saw nothing in them worth carrying away. One writer saw far more in them.
Nevertheless the clearing out was not complete. The poor did not fail in the land; some were left in it. The foreigner thought little of it, but they were a pledge that a poor remnant would return. They pledged a nation yet to be poor in spirit, when God brings back the captivity of His people. Then Jacob shall rejoice and Israel shall be glad.
One writer traces where the news took these captains, and why bowing to Babylon was wisdom and not surrender.
When people learned that Gedaliah had been made governor, officers of the armies and their men, who had scattered from Judah, came to Mizpah, where Gedaliah lived. Among them were some prominent men, especially Ishmael and Johanan. Gedaliah planned to stay in the land and to be subject to the king of Babylon. He took an oath to this effect before these men, and required them also to serve Nebuchadnezzar. This was the wise thing to do, for God had brought them down and rebellion would have been rebellion against God. So too in Christendom. Because of the sad failure in testimony, God has allowed confusion — the meaning of the name Babylon — to take open possession of the church. It is only right that we bow to the shame of our confusion. We should not expect to return to the bright early days of the Church at Pentecost.
Another writer states what submission would have secured, and what they chose instead.
If at this last hour this remnant had submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar, peace would have reigned in the land. These few who remained would have held it. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no idea of trusting in the Lord.
Jeremiah was free to go wherever he wanted. Where he chose to settle says a great deal about this small, poor group.
Jeremiah had full liberty to go where he pleased (Jer. 40:1-5). But, gracious and faithful man that he was, he chose to stay with the poor few who were in the right place (Jer. 40:6). Despite all that had happened, this feeble remnant were in their right place in the Lord's land. The remnant drew many; they sought it out, joined it, and got much blessing (Jer. 40:7-12).
The next verse names these captains one by one. They came with their men, and it looked like a reunion. One writer sees the flaw in it.
Everything, however, was out of order. The return of the scattered captains and their forces counted for nothing, because the Lord was not at all in their thoughts. And there is a strange reversal here: the governor swears to them, not they to him.
Within months Ishmael, one of the captains who came to Mizpah, murdered Gedaliah. One writer reads chapters 40 and 41 together and asks what the right place is worth.
Chapters 40-41 expose the mistake of thinking that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to the godless hypocrisy shown here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.
- Left — Babylon spared the poorest. Their presence in the land was a quiet pledge that God would bring His people back.
- Gathered — News of Gedaliah's appointment drew the captains out of the fields. Jews came home from Moab, Ammon, and Edom, and many found real blessing.
- Submitted — Bowing to Babylon was obedience, not defeat, because God Himself had brought them down. Those who bowed would have kept the land in peace.
- Empty — The reunion counted for nothing, because the Lord was not in their thoughts. Even the oath ran backwards: the governor swore to them.
- Exposed — The right place is no safeguard without being right with God. Within months one of these captains murdered the governor.
And they came to Gedaliah to Mizpah; even Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, and Johanan and Jonathan the sons of Kareah, and Seraiah the son of Tanhumeth, and the sons of Ephai the Netophathite, and Jezaniah the son of a Maachathite, they and their men.
Jerusalem has fallen. The king of Babylon has made Gedaliah governor over what is left of the nation. Verse 8 lists the army officers who came in from the countryside to Mizpah. One name on that list belongs to the man who would murder the governor.
The chapters that follow the fall of the city are not a story of recovery. They record what happened to the poor who were left behind.
Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44 show us the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land, or near it. Most of their fellow countrymen had been carried captive to Babylon. Jeremiah becomes their helper and brings them the word of the Lord. But he finds among them the greatest unbelief… Now even the little remnant, the poor left in the land where Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
These captains and their men had been scattered across the fields. Their arrival at the governor's town looks like safety in numbers.
But the people of God can never be a place of ease. Least of all can they give security, except where faith looks straight to the Lord.
The name of the town they gathered at means:
Watch-tower
The list names Ishmael the son of Nethaniah first. Here is what he went on to do.
Son of Nethaniah, of the royal line, though which family is not known. His cunning and ferocity show he was unworthy of a throne. He betrayed Gedaliah and killed him. The king of Babylon had made Gedaliah governor over the cities of Judah. Ishmael killed all the Jews who were with him at Mizpah too. He followed up this crime with the cruel and treacherous murder of eighty men from Shechem, Shiloh and Samaria. They were bringing gifts to the temple, and he spared only ten. He then carried off everyone left in Mizpah and set out to cross over to the Ammonites. But Johanan the son of Kareah, and those with him, rescued the captives. Ishmael escaped and is never heard of again.
A ruined country does not produce humble men.
But sin ruins everything, everywhere. Ambition and scheming, treachery and violence can work in a flattened Judea. They work there as surely as in victorious Babylon — and more painfully. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as the good. Wickedness does not have to wait long for an opportunity, even when it has no excuse to cover its shame. A wicked Jew lends himself to the plans of a pagan neighbour, jealous of any order or easing of sorrow in the land.
The verse records a reunion. It looks like the start of a new community.
Everything, though, was out of order. The return of the scattered captains and their forces counted for nothing, because the Lord was not in their thoughts at all.
One captain in this list appears under a different name in 2 Kings 25:23. The two names belong to the same man.
Son of Hoshaiah, a Maachathite, and a captain among those left in the land by the king of Babylon, 2 Kings 25:23. Called Jezaniah in Jeremiah 40:8 and Jeremiah 42:1.
These men stayed in the land while others went to Babylon. Staying did not make them better.
Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea. A remnant in the land — in the right place — does not therefore have some superior standing. To be in the right place, without being right with the right Person, only exposes us to bad behaviour. It exposes us to the godless hypocrisy shown here. They had God's prophet among them, and they pretended to value his word. Even so, they acted deceitfully. To call on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety. To that end the Holy Spirit of God is here to lift Him high before the eyes of our faith.
- Place. They gathered at Mizpah, the "watch-tower" — the right spot on the map, with no one watching.
- People. Soldiers came in from the fields. A gathering counts for nothing when the Lord is not in their thoughts.
- Poison. Ishmael's name heads the list; ambition and scheming work in a flattened Judea as surely as in victorious Babylon.
- Pretence. The right place counts for nothing without being right with the right Person.
- Point. Among God's people there is no place of ease — security comes only where faith looks straight to the Lord.
And Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan swore unto them and to their men, saying, Fear not to serve the Chaldeans dwell in the land, and serve the king of Babylon, and it shall be well with you.
Jerusalem has fallen. Most of the people have been carried off to Babylon. The conqueror has appointed a governor, Gedaliah, who now gathers the scattered army captains at Mizpah and puts them under oath. His words sound like surrender. Yet commentators treat them as the safe path God had left open. Why could life under a foreign king ever be called "well"?
Notice which way the oath runs. The man in power binds himself to the men who came to him:
A strange inversion is seen in the governor swearing to them, not they to him... Nothing could be more conciliatory than the governor's words nor more sincere than his ways. For he was content to do his duty to the conqueror in the difficult condition of the land, but to serve the people as far as he was able.
The verse names one rule two ways: serve the Chaldeans, serve the king of Babylon. The order not to fear that service only makes sense if the rule came from God. On that reading the offer was real, and refusing it cost the people the land:
If at this last hour this remnant had submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar, peace would have reigned in the land. The few who remained would have kept it. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no idea of trusting in Jehovah.
Behind this lies a simple rule:
As has been said: "In a day of ruin faith always recognises the chastening of God and bows to it. Unbelief always resists."
The oath gave the land a moment of real mercy. It did not last:
So there might have been a state of things, far from bright certainly, but by no means without mercy from the Lord for the poor in the land. But sin ruins everything everywhere. Ambition and intrigue, treachery and violence can work in fallen Judea as surely as in victorious Babylon — and they hurt more there.
One man's jealousy brought the whole arrangement down:
Jealousy, however, will spoil everything. A certain man of royal blood named Ishmael evidently thought that he should have been appointed governor. And so he kills Gedaliah along with all the Jews with him and the Chaldean men of war that had been left there by the king of Babylon.
Gedaliah was told what was coming, and he brushed it aside:
God did not fail to give timely and full warning of the danger hanging over Gedaliah. He was unwise and careless to ignore it. But a good man does not like to hear evil. Feeling nothing but kindness toward others, he is slow to believe the malice of those he had only tried to serve.
Those who took the oath stayed in the land, which was the right place to be. That did not make them right people:
Chapters 40-41 expose for us the false idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — necessarily has some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to hypocrisy such as we see illustrated here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.
One writer carries Gedaliah's choice over to the church today:
Gedaliah decided to stay in the land and to be subject to the king of Babylon. He took an oath to this effect before these men, and required them to serve Nebuchadnezzar too. This was the wise thing to do, for God had brought them down and rebellion would have been rebellion against God. The same is true in Christendom. Because of the sad failure in testimony, God has allowed confusion (the meaning of Babylon) to take hold of the church in public view. It is only right that we bow to the shame of our confusion.
- The yoke — Gedaliah's oath told the captains to accept Babylon's rule. Commentators read that yoke as God's own chastening. Refusing it would have been rebellion against God, not just against Nebuchadnezzar.
- The promise — "it shall be well with you" was a real offer. Had the people submitted, peace would have reigned and the few left would have kept the land.
- The governor — Gedaliah bound himself by oath to the men who came to him. He did his duty to the conqueror and served his own people as far as he could.
- The failure — being in the right place proved nothing. The prophet lived among them, and they still acted deceitfully. Gedaliah ignored the warning, and jealousy spoiled everything.
- The lesson — where testimony has failed and confusion has taken hold, the path is the same. Bow to the shame instead of resisting the hand that brought it.
And as for me, behold, I dwell at Mizpah, to stand before the Chaldeans, who will come unto us; and ye, gather wine, and summer fruits, and oil, and put [them] in your vessels, and dwell in your cities which ye have taken.
Jerusalem has fallen, and the king of Babylon has put Gedaliah in charge of the few people left in Judah. His orders — gather the harvest, store it, stay in your towns — raise a hard question: can a broken people find peace inside the judgment that broke them?
Gedaliah's arrangement splits the work. He will live at Mizpah and face the Chaldeans — the Babylonians now ruling the land — on their behalf. Their part is to gather the harvest, store it, and live in the towns they hold. One writer weighs the governor's character and the pledge he gave.
There is a strange reversal here: the governor swears to them, not they to him. … Nothing could be more reassuring than the governor's words, nor more sincere than his ways. The land was in a distressing condition. He was content to do his duty to the conqueror, but also to serve the people as far as he could.
Jeremiah had urged surrender to Babylon all through his ministry. It cost him his reputation. Verse 10 turns that same counsel into daily routine.
God meant their exile to be for their eventual good. This is a very important point. In a day of ruin faith always recognises the chastening of God and bows to it. Unbelief always resists, and thinks of its resistance as patriotism or perhaps religion. That is why the men of Judah thought Jeremiah was a very false Jew. He always advised them to submit to the king of Babylon. They thought themselves much better Jews, because they were willing to fight against the king of Babylon.
What was at stake shows up later. The people abandoned this settled life and ran to Egypt.
God had placed the Chaldean king over them. If they had stayed quietly in the land under his authority, they would have survived. But they chose human policy, and thought it safer to go down into Egypt, when in fact it proved to be the opposite.
The command was not empty. The verses that follow report that the fruit came in, and in quantity.
For this poor remnant there was a break of several months. They gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance (Jer. 40:12). They even seem to have honoured the worship of the Lord again, at a time when the temple lay completely destroyed and ruined. At least there was a "house of Jehovah" where those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up.
The fruit was not all that came in. People came too.
Despite everything that had happened, this feeble remnant were in their right place in Jehovah's land. Many others were drawn to them. They sought out the remnant, joined them, and received much blessing.
Here the writers differ in emphasis. Where one sees blessing in the remnant's position, another warns that the position on its own guarantees nothing.
Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must therefore have some superior qualification. Suppose we are in the right place but not right with the right Person. That will only expose us to bad behaviour and hypocrisy, as this passage shows. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully. … Ishmael killed Gedaliah and those who were with him, and fled with the rest. He added to his guilt by killing a company of worshippers on their way to the house of the Lord.
Babylon offered the prophet a comfortable life, and he turned it down. He stayed with the people told to pick fruit in a ruined country.
Jeremiah had no heart for Chaldea, whatever attractions might seem to be there. He preferred to suffer in the land with the lowest of those whom man had left behind. … It was love that made him stay in the scene of their humiliation; it was a pledge of restoration.
That choice is read as a pattern for anyone tempted to leave a small and unimpressive gathering for somewhere more rewarding.
He prefers to stay with the poor of the people of God in their destitution rather than enjoy the favours of the king of Babylon. Perhaps there is not much to attract you in your own meeting — not many spiritual gifts, not an abundance of warm fellowship. But the Lord promises to be in the midst of two or three gathered to His name. If He fulfils that promise by His presence, is that not the place where you should stay and, depending on Him, try to contribute some spiritual blessing?
- Bow. Faith recognises God's chastening and bows to it. Unbelief resists, and calls its resistance loyalty.
- Stay. Those who stayed under the authority God had placed over them would have been safe. Those who made their own plan and fled to Egypt were not.
- Gather. Submission was not idleness. Wine, summer fruits and oil came in richly, and worship revived among a people with no temple left.
- Attract. Scattered Jews heard where the remnant was and came back to join them, and received much blessing.
- Beware. The right place is not enough. Without being right with the right Person, this same remnant turned to treachery and murder.
Likewise all the Jews that were in Moab, and among the children of Ammon and in Edom, and that were in all the lands, heard that the king of Babylon had left a remnant in Judah, and that he had appointed over them Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan;
When Jerusalem fell, some Jews escaped over the borders into Moab, Ammon, Edom and other lands. Now they hear that Babylon has left a remnant in Judah, with a governor from their own people over them.
What drew these scattered Jews back was not a royal decree but the character of the man Babylon had put in charge. One writer describes the governor's manner:
Nothing could be more conciliatory than the governor's words, nor more sincere than his ways. He was content to do his duty to the conqueror in the distressing condition of the land, but to serve the people to the utmost of his power. And this had its effect.
The verse names Gedaliah's father and grandfather. That family history mattered:
Nebuchadnezzar establishes Gedaliah the son of Ahikam over the people left in the land to be vinedressers and labourers. This Ahikam had saved Jeremiah in the days of Jehoiakim, when, like Urijah the prophet, he had prophesied against Jerusalem (Jer. 26:24). No doubt this action had influenced the king of Babylon, who respected and protected Jeremiah. Gedaliah lived at Mizpah, a strong city that Asa, king of Judah, had built with the stones of Ramah (1 Kings 15:22). Jeremiah went there. So did all those from the surrounding regions who had escaped, along with the poor people left in the land. They came to seek the protection of Gedaliah, this noble lieutenant of the king of Babylon. He reassured the people. He swore to them that they had nothing to fear in accepting their servitude to the Chaldeans.
They were coming back to a wrecked country under a foreign power. One writer measures the mercy still in that scene, and what ruined it:
So there might have been a state of things, far from bright certainly, but by no means without mercy from the Lord for the poor in the land. But sin ruins everything, everywhere. Ambition and intrigue, treachery and violence can work in a flattened Judea as surely as in victorious Babylon — and more painfully. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as the good. Their own deep debts to a good man can sometimes make their purpose even worse.
The next verse records what the homecoming produced:
For this poor remnant there was a respite of several months. They gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance (Jer. 40:12). People even seem to have honoured the worship of the Lord again. And that was at a time when the temple lay in complete ruins. At least there was a "house of Jehovah" to which those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up.
It is easy to read this gathering as a hopeful revival. The chapters that follow show otherwise:
Jeremiah 40 to 44 shows the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land or near it. By then Babylon had carried most of their brothers away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper, bringing them the word of Jehovah. But he finds among them the greatest unbelief… Even the little remnant — the poor left in the land, among whom Jeremiah remained — were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
These men came back to the right country, with the right governor, and with a prophet of God living among them. That was still not enough:
Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualification. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person only exposes us to bad behaviour and hypocrisy, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, they acted deceitfully — though they pretended to value his word. To call on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety. For that purpose the Holy Spirit of God is here, to exalt Him before the eyes of our faith.
- News gathers them. Word that Babylon had left a remnant, and set Gedaliah over it, travelled as far as Moab, Ammon and Edom. It brought scattered Jews home.
- Kindness gathers them. Gedaliah served the people sincerely and gently. That, not force, "had its effect."
- Mercy meets them. The scene was far from bright, yet it was "by no means without mercy from the Lord for the poor in the land."
- Harvest crowns it — briefly. A few months of wine and summer fruits in abundance, with worship honoured again. Then jealousy and murder ended it.
- The heart undoes it. They were in the right place, with the prophet among them. But "God was not really in their thoughts." The right place is no safety without the right Person.
and all the Jews returned out of all the places whither they had been driven, and came to the land of Judah to Gedaliah, unto Mizpah, and gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance.
After Jerusalem fell, Babylon's king put Gedaliah in charge at Mizpah, and scattered Jews came home to him from Moab, Ammon and Edom. The ruined land then gave them a rich harvest — so why such plenty for a people who would soon throw it away?
The harvest begins with the man in charge. One writer ties the return of the scattered Jews to the way the new governor spoke and acted.
Nothing could have been more friendly than the governor's words, and nothing more sincere than his ways. He was content to do his duty to the conqueror while the land was in such distress, and at the same time to serve the people with all his power. And this had its effect.
The abundance was not a new era. It came inside a short pause, and something else revived in that pause too.
For this poor remnant there was a break of several months. They gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance (Jer. 40:12). It even seems that they held the worship of the Lord in honour again, at a time when the temple lay in complete ruins. At least there was a "house of the Lord" to go up to, for those who grieved over Israel's condition.
Nothing here is glorious. The temple is in ruins and the survivors live under a foreign king. Yet the full baskets still counted for something, and what wrecked it next was not Babylon.
So things in the land could have settled down. That situation would have been far from bright, of course, but in no way without mercy from the Lord for the poor. But sin ruins everything, everywhere. Ambition and scheming, treachery and violence can work in a crushed Judea just as surely as in a victorious Babylon, and they hurt more there. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as what is good, and when they owe a good man much, that can make their aim even worse. Wickedness does not have to wait long for its opportunity.
The verse shows busy hands. The chapters around it show what these same people carried inside.
The poor were left in the land, and Jeremiah stayed among them. Even this little remnant was full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
These returning Jews did what looked best. They came back to Judah rather than stay in Moab or Ammon, and they prospered there. It still did not save them.
Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea. Being a remnant in the land — in the right place — does not by itself make anyone better qualified. It is possible to be in the right place and still not be right with the right Person. That only leaves us open to bad behaviour and shameless hypocrisy, as we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word. Still they acted deceitfully. To call upon the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety.
The plenty of this verse was the life God was offering them. Within months Gedaliah was murdered, and the survivors ran to Egypt instead of staying under the arrangement God had allowed.
Had they remained quietly in the land subject to the authority of the Chaldean king whom God had placed over them, they would have been preserved. But they, choosing human policy, thought it was safer to go down into Egypt, whereas it proved to be the opposite.
- Gift. A people who had just lost everything gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance. Even a wrecked land was not without mercy from the Lord for the poor.
- Gathering. Gedaliah served both his conqueror and his people. His words and ways drew the scattered Jews home from Moab, Ammon and Edom.
- Grace-period. The plenty lasted a few months. In that break, people even honoured the worship of the Lord again, with the temple in ruins.
- Gap. Full hands, empty hearts. The same gatherers were "full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason," and God was "not really in their thoughts."
- Giveaway. The right place is not the same as being right with the right Person. These same people trusted themselves instead of God, and went down to Egypt.
And Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces that were in the fields, came to Gedaliah unto Mizpah,
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
and said unto him, Dost thou indeed know that Baalis the king of the children of Ammon hath sent Ishmael the son of Nethaniah to smite thee to death? But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam believed them not.
Babylon has left Gedaliah as governor over the survivors in Judah. Then a warning comes: Baalis of Ammon has sent a man to kill him, and Gedaliah will not believe it. What do you do with an unwelcome report from a source you do not trust? And what does it cost to get that judgment wrong?
After Jerusalem fell, a small group was left in the land. The picture is not a pretty one.
Jeremiah 40 to 44 shows us the lawlessness and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land, or near it, after most of their people had been carried off to Babylon... Now even the small group of poor people left in the land, where Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
Gedaliah's father had already stood by the prophet Jeremiah. Under Gedaliah, scattered people came home.
This Ahikam had saved Jeremiah in the days of Jehoiakim... Jeremiah went there, and so did all those from the surrounding regions who had escaped, along with the poor people who were left. They came to seek the protection of Gedaliah, this noble deputy of the king of Babylon. He calmed their fears, swearing to them that they had nothing to fear in serving the Chaldeans.
His words to the returning captains were generous, and people came back to the land because of him.
Nothing could be more conciliatory than the governor's words nor more sincere than his ways. For he was content to do his duty to the conqueror in the distressful condition of the land, but to serve the people to the utmost of his power. And this had its effect.
Baalis, a foreign king, resents the new order in Judah. Ishmael, a Jew, is willing to serve his plan.
But sin ruins everything, everywhere. Ambition and scheming, treachery and violence, can work in a crushed Judea just as well as in a victorious Babylon — and they hurt more there. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as the good; and the debt they owe to a good man can make their plan even worse. Wickedness does not wait long for its chance, even when it has no excuse to hide its shame. A wicked Jew gives himself to the plans of a pagan neighbour, who resents any order or easing of sorrow in the land.
God did not leave Gedaliah in the dark. The verse says he would not believe them — the warning came from more than one man. That is what makes his refusal a fault and not just bad luck.
So God did not fail to give Gedaliah warning of the danger hanging over him, and the warning came in time and was enough. It was unwise and careless of him to brush it aside. A good man does not love to hear evil. Feeling nothing but kindness toward others, he is slow to believe there is malice in men he has only tried to serve. Still, in this case it was a fault. He held a public and responsible position. His life mattered greatly, both for the help of the poor and as a safeguard against the suspicion or displeasure of the Chaldeans. Witnesses in plenty, more than two or three, told him of the plot between the king of the Ammonites and Ishmael against his life. Gedaliah should have looked into it further and been on his guard.
Gedaliah faced a real problem. The man who brought the warning was himself unreliable, and he offered to get rid of Ishmael. That did not make the report false.
It is not that Johanan was much better than Ishmael. As later events show, he had no real faith in God's word, and he hardened himself in pride and rebellion of heart. It may be that Gedaliah knew there was little to choose between the two men, and so turned down the good warning as well as Johanan's bad offer to get rid of Ishmael... But in that evil day it was not wise or right to brush aside a report, even one from a suspect source. Had Gedaliah waited on God, he would have been slower to accuse the one of lying or to clear the other.
Those left in the land might think their position made them better than the exiles. These chapters take that idea apart.
Chapters 40-41 show up the mistake of thinking that a group left in the land — in the right place — must have something better about them. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only leave us open to bad behaviour and to the ungodly hypocrisy we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully. Calling on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety.
- Warned. More than two or three witnesses brought Gedaliah the news in time. The danger was never hidden from him.
- Unwilling. A good man hates to hear evil. Kindness made him slow to believe the worst of a man he had only tried to serve. Sincerity is not the same as safety.
- Responsible. His life mattered to the poor and shielded them from the suspicion of the Chaldeans. Carelessness here was a fault, not a private matter.
- Waiting. Had he waited on God, he would have been slower to call one man a liar and slower to clear the other. Neither deserved a quick verdict.
- Rooted. Being in the right place is no substitute for being right with the right Person. Calling on the Lord out of a pure heart is our safety.
And Johanan the son of Kareah spoke to Gedaliah in Mizpah secretly, saying, Let me go, I pray thee, and I will smite Ishmael the son of Nethaniah and no man shall know it why should he take thy life, and all they of Judah who are gathered unto thee be scattered, and the remnant of Judah perish?
Judah lies in ruins, and Babylon has made Gedaliah governor over the poor who are left in the land. Johanan now takes him aside with a secret offer: let me kill Ishmael first, and no one will ever know. Two hard questions meet in this one verse. Should you trust a warning that comes from a doubtful man? And may one murder be done to stop another?
after_note: none
Johanan argues from the good of everyone gathered around Gedaliah: kill Ishmael, or the last of Judah is scattered. But the man making that argument was no better than the man he wanted dead. Kelly suggests Gedaliah saw little to choose between the two, and so threw out the warning along with the offer:
Johanan was not much better than Ishmael. As later events show, he had no real faith in God's word and hardened himself in pride and rebellion of heart. It is possible that Gedaliah knew there was little to choose between them, and so he rejected the good warning as well as the bad offer to get rid of Ishmael... But in that evil day it was not wise or right to despise a report just because it came from a source he had reason to suspect. And Gedaliah, had he waited on God, would have been less quick either to charge the one with lying or to clear the other.
His answer refuses two things at once — the report, and the hand offered to act on it.
Gedaliah, warned by Johanan, one of the captains, of the treachery being planned, refused to believe it and refused to take part in the murder of Ishmael.
The refusal came out of his own goodness. But goodness did not excuse him, because of the position he held.
God gave warning of the danger hanging over Gedaliah in good time, and the warning was enough. He was careless and unwise to despise it. But a good man does not like to hear evil. He has nothing but kindness in his own heart toward others, so he is slow to believe in the malice of people he had only tried to help. Still, in this case it was not without fault. He was in a public and responsible position. His life mattered much, both for the help of the poor and as a protection against the suspicion or anger of the Babylonians. Plenty of witnesses, more than two or three, told him of the plot against his life between the king of the Ammonites and Ishmael. Gedaliah should have looked into it further and stood on his guard. But he did not believe them, and soon paid the price of his rashness.
Gedaliah answered by charging Johanan with lying. The outcome settled which man had told the truth.
Gedaliah seems to have been a sincere, unsuspecting man... The presence of Ishmael, though, meant Gedaliah's overthrow. Johanan warned him of this, but he treated it as a false suspicion. It was true all the same, and Ishmael killed Gedaliah and those who were with him, and fled with the rest.
There was a step Gedaliah never took. Grant, writing on one of David's psalms, points to prayer as the safeguard he passed by.
Believers are sometimes deceived by the smooth words and speeches of a deceiver, as Gedaliah was when Ishmael came to him... If Gedaliah had prayed as David did in this psalm, he might have been kept from an early death. We may excuse ourselves from responsibility on the ground that someone deceived us. But if a believer is deceived, it is his own fault, for communion with the Lord will preserve from all deception.
The lesson cuts both ways. Gedaliah's fault was not thinking well of people. It was refusing to look into a serious charge backed by many witnesses. The opposite error is just as real.
While we are to be watchful, we are not to be suspicious. Gracious, loving care for one another is the very opposite of a restless, prying, meddlesome spirit. We are not to suspect that evil exists without proper ground.
Kelly closes with a prayer that holds both sides together:
May we learn, though in a different way, one that suits the Christian calling, to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves!
- Warned. God warned Gedaliah in good time, through more than two or three witnesses. The danger was never hidden from him.
- Refused. He turned down both halves of Johanan's offer. He would not believe the report, and he would not share in killing Ishmael.
- Why. A kind man is slow to believe evil of people he has only tried to help. But kindness did not cancel his duty. His public post made his life matter to many others.
- Cost. What he dismissed as a false suspicion proved true. Ishmael killed him and fled with the rest of the people.
- Safeguard. Had he waited on God, he would have been quicker to inquire and slower to judge either man. Communion with the Lord — not suspicion — is what keeps a believer from being deceived.
But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam said unto Johanan the son of Kareah, Thou shalt not do this thing; for thou speakest falsely of Ishmael.
The ruined nation had one thing left: a quiet corner of the land, a harvest, and a governor who wanted only their good. Then armed men warned Gedaliah of a plot on his life. In one sentence he dismissed both the warning and the man who brought it.
The situation Gedaliah inherited was not hopeless. People who had escaped captivity were gathering wine and summer fruits under a decent governor. What ruined it was not Babylon but the men in the land.
So there might have been a state of things, far from bright certainly, but by no means without mercy from the Lord for the poor in the land. But sin ruins everything everywhere. Ambition and intrigue, treachery and violence can work in fallen Judea as surely as in victorious Babylon. There they hurt even more. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as the good.
Gedaliah's refusal grew out of his own goodness. He had only ever wished these men well, so he could not picture one of them wanting him dead. Kelly does not treat that as innocence, though. The warning was clear and repeated, and he owed something to the people depending on him.
God did not fail to give timely and sufficient warning of the danger hanging over Gedaliah... But a good man does not like to hear evil; and having no feeling but kindness toward others, he is slow to believe the malice of those he had only sought to serve. Still, in this case he was not without fault. He held a public and responsible position. His life mattered much, both to help the poor and to guard against the suspicion or displeasure of the Babylonians. Plenty of witnesses, more than two or three, told him of the plot between the king of the Ammonites and Ishmael against his life. Gedaliah should have asked further questions and been on his guard.
Johanan made two proposals: believe the report, and let him quietly kill Ishmael. Gedaliah turned down both together. One writer notes that he "refused to believe it and to have part in the murder of Ishmael" — and refusing a secret assassination was right. The mistake was bundling the warning in with it.
It is not that Johanan was much better than Ishmael... And it is possible that Gedaliah knew there was little to choose between them. So he rejected the good warning along with the bad offer — Johanan's offer to get rid of Ishmael in secret, so that no one would know. But in that evil day it was neither wise nor good to dismiss a report just because it came from a questionable source. Had Gedaliah waited on God, he would have been slower to accuse the one of lying and to clear the other. May we learn, in a way suited to the Christian calling, to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves!
Calling the report a lie did not make it one. The killing that followed reached far past Gedaliah himself.
Gedaliah seems to have been a sincere, unsuspecting man... Johanan warned him of this, but he treated it as a false suspicion (vv. 13-16). It was true all the same. Ishmael killed Gedaliah and those with him. He added to his guilt by killing a group of worshippers on their way to the house of the Lord, and then fled with the rest.
Kelly points to what was missing: Gedaliah did not wait on God before deciding. Another writer ties the same lesson to a prayer of David, and will not accept being deceived as an excuse.
Sadly, believers are sometimes deceived by the smooth words and speeches of a deceiver, as Gedaliah was when Ishmael came to him... If Gedaliah had prayed as David did in this psalm, he might have been kept from an untimely end. We may excuse ourselves from responsibility on the grounds that someone deceived us. But if a believer is deceived, it is his own fault. Communion with the Lord will preserve from all deception.
This remnant had what the exiles in Babylon did not — the land, the harvest, and the prophet living among them. It saved no one.
Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must somehow have superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to hypocrisy like the kind shown here. The prophet of God was living among them, and they pretended to value his word. Still they acted deceitfully.
- Kindness — Gedaliah could not believe evil of men he had only helped. His goodness became the opening for the plot.
- Kindness untested — plenty of witnesses brought the warning. A man in public office should have asked more questions, not dismissed it.
- Kindness misapplied — he was right to forbid a secret killing. But he threw out the true warning with the wrong remedy.
- Kindness unguarded — had he waited on the Lord, he would have been slower to call one man a liar and clear the other. Communion with God is what keeps us from deception.
- Kindness misplaced — the land, the harvest and the prophet among them guaranteed nothing. Being in the right place is no substitute for being right with the right Person.
And it came to pass in the seventh month, that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah the son of Elishama, of the royal seed, and [one] of the king's chief men, and ten men with him, came to Gedaliah the son of Ahikam unto Mizpah, and there they ate bread together, in Mizpah.
A man of royal blood shares a meal with the governor of Judah, then kills him at his own table. The details matter: the seventh month, the shared bread, the ten men, Ishmael's royal descent. Commentators read them as a picture of a nation collapsing from the inside.
These chapters follow the Jews left in the land after Babylon carried the rest away:
In Jeremiah 40 to 44 we have the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land, or near it. Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper, bringing them the word of the Lord. But he finds among them the greatest unbelief… now even the little remnant, the poor left in the land among whom Jeremiah remained, were full of jealousy and full of their own plans. They were full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
Scripture names Ishmael's royal descent, and that detail carries weight:
The Holy Spirit adds a description to Ishmael's name and family that is not meaningless: "of the royal line." Normally, and rightly, that would have guaranteed help to a governor, and support and shelter for the people. But God was forgotten, His judgments as well as His will ignored, and human corruption runs its course where it was least fitting. The ruin of Israel was complete when the royal line sank to the lowest form of cunning, treachery and murder. And the victims were the best of their own people.
One sin lay behind the murder:
Jealousy, however, will spoil everything. A certain man of royal blood named Ishmael evidently thought that he should have been appointed governor. And so he kills Gedaliah along with all the Jews with him and the Chaldean soldiers that had been left there by the king of Babylon.
The shared bread makes the crime worse, and it did not stop with Gedaliah:
This was not only jealousy of the good man who fell unsuspectingly at his own table, where he had generously welcomed these agents of wickedness… This royal outlaw had tasted blood and would carry on his reckless course, not caring whom he killed or why.
Submitting to Babylon was not weakness:
Gedaliah was determined to remain in the land and to be subject to the king of Babylon. He took an oath to this effect before these men, and required them to serve Nebuchadnezzar too. This was the wise thing to do, for God had brought them down, and rebellion would have been rebellion against God.
The best men died. That looks like pure loss:
Who can doubt that God was pleased to take away Gedaliah, and those who grieved over the desolations of Israel, from the evil that was coming? It was mercy to themselves. It was also a further chastening on the guilty people, high and low: their own countrymen swept away the very men who acted and felt most rightly.
The remnant had the right land and God's prophet living with them. It changed nothing:
Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea. Being a remnant in the land — in the right place — does not by itself give anyone a superior standing. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and false piety, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.
Israel kept mourning this murder long after the event:
The Lord's answer through Zechariah linked a second fast with the one they had asked about, kept in the seventh month. It seems to have been in memory of the murder of Gedaliah and others, and of the flight of the remnant left in the land into Egypt… The people marked these tragedies with fasting and tears through the seventy years of captivity.
- Place. The remnant was in the right land, with God's prophet among them. They were still full of jealousy, treason, deceit and violence. God was not in their thoughts.
- Person. The right place without the right Person leads to bad behaviour and false piety. Standing somewhere good guarantees nothing.
- Pedigree. "Of the royal line" should have meant protection for a governor. Here it sank to cunning and murder. That is how complete the ruin was.
- Position. Gedaliah's oath to serve Babylon was wisdom, because God had brought them down. Striking him down was rebellion against God, not just against a king.
- Providence. The best men fell. For them it was mercy, taken away from the evil that was coming. For a guilty people it was chastening, since their own countrymen did the killing. The nation fasted over that day for seventy years.
And Ishmael the son of Nethaniah arose, and the ten men that were with him, and smote Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan with the sword, and killed him, whom the king of Babylon had appointed over the land.
Jerusalem has fallen, and Babylon has left a governor, Gedaliah, over the poor who remain in the land. This verse records how that last fragile arrangement ended: at a shared meal, by the hand of a guest.
Verse 1 puts Ishmael and his ten men at Gedaliah's table before verse 2 puts a sword in their hands. One commentator keeps that meal in view when he weighs the crime.
This was not only jealousy against the good man who fell unsuspecting at his own table, where he had welcomed these messengers of evil as guests. Nor was it simply rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon, which broke out at Mizpah against the native governor and the foreign soldiers. The royal criminal had tasted blood. He would carry on his desperate course, not caring whom he killed or why.
Jeremiah notes that Ishmael came from the royal line. One writer shows why that phrase matters.
It is not a meaningless description when the Holy Spirit adds to Ishmael's name and ancestry the words "of the royal family." Normally this would rightly have been a guarantee of support to a governor, and a strength and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten, His judgments as well as His will ignored, and human corruption runs its course where it was least fitting. Truly the ruin of Israel was complete when the royal line sank into the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder.
Commentators point to two forces working at once. One names the personal grievance.
Jealousy will spoil everything. A certain man of royal blood named Ishmael evidently thought that he should have been appointed governor. And so he kills Gedaliah along with all the Jews with him and the Chaldean men of war left there by the king of Babylon.
Another points past Ishmael to the foreign king who sent him.
This man, however, came with evil purposes, sent by Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, and driven, no doubt, by his own ambition.
Gedaliah did not die for lack of warning.
God did not fail to give timely and adequate warning of the danger hanging over Gedaliah. And he was certainly careless and unwise to have brushed it aside. But a good man does not like to hear evil. His own heart holds nothing but kindness toward others. So he is slow to believe the malice of those he had only tried to help. Still, in this case it was not without fault. He held a public and responsible position. His life mattered a great deal, both for helping the poor and as a safeguard against the suspicion or anger of the Chaldeans.
The killing did not end with Gedaliah. The survivors ran for Egypt, and one writer names the root of that flight.
Fear is evidence of unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion, even if it is not as obvious. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to run to Egypt. What came of this disobedience, flowing out of distrust, we have yet to learn. What a blessing it is for the believer! He is free to trample on his fears and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety.
The deeper problem was not where they were living.
Chapters 40-41 expose for us the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — automatically has some superior standing. To be in the right place, without being right with the right Person, will only leave us open to bad behaviour and hollow hypocrisy, as this account shows.
The murder also left its mark on Israel's calendar.
The Lord adds a fast in the seventh month, which was another fast in memory of the murder of Gedaliah by Ishmael (Jer. 41:1-2). The Lord raises a serious question. Were these fasts out of concern for His glory, or did Israel have selfish motives?
Yet that mourning is not the last word on the date.
"The fast of the fourth month, and the fast of the fifth, and the fast of the seventh, and the fast of the tenth, shall be to the house of Judah seasons of joy and gladness and cheerful feasts. Therefore love truth and peace." All the feasts named appear to belong to the siege and destruction of Jerusalem, and to what followed.
- Table — the sword came from guests he had just fed. The welcome makes the treachery worse, not lighter.
- Warning — Gedaliah heard the plot named and would not believe it. Kindness that refuses to hear evil is still a fault in a man with public responsibility.
- Bloodline — "of the royal family" is no idle phrase. The line that should have sheltered the people produced their killer.
- Flight — fear scattered the survivors toward Egypt, and that kind of fear is unbelief as truly as open rebellion.
- Feast — the day became a fast in the seventh month, yet God's promise is that such days of mourning turn into joy and gladness.
And Ishmael smote all the Jews that were with him, with Gedaliah, at Mizpah, and the Chaldeans that were found there, the men of war.
The murder of the governor Gedaliah did not end with him. The same sword fell on the men around him at Mizpah, and on the Babylonian soldiers stationed there. How far will treachery run once God is forgotten? And what does it cost a people who strike down the order He had allowed over them?
Babylon did not deport everyone. A small group stayed in the land, and one writer sums up their condition.
In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we see the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land or near it. Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away as captives. Jeremiah becomes their helper, bringing them the word of the Lord. But he finds among them the greatest unbelief... even this little remnant, the poor left in the land where Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy and full of their own plans. They were full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
Scripture tells us Ishmael was "of the royal family." One writer treats that detail as deliberate. It measures how far the collapse had gone.
The Holy Spirit adds to Ishmael's name and family the words "of the royal seed," and that description means something. Normally, and rightly, royal blood would have guaranteed help to a governor. It would have been a support and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten, and His judgments and His will were slighted. Human corruption takes its course where it was least fitting. The ruin of Israel was complete when the royal seed sank into the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder — and this against the best of their own people.
The killing did not stop with Gedaliah. One writer traces it to ambition for Gedaliah's post.
Jealousy, however, will spoil everything. A certain man of royal blood named Ishmael evidently thought that he should have been appointed governor. And so he kills Gedaliah along with all the Jews with him and the Chaldean men of war that had been left there by the king of Babylon.
Yet jealousy does not explain everything that follows. One writer points to a growing taste for killing.
It was not only jealousy of the good man who fell without suspicion at his own table, where he had welcomed these wicked messengers as guests. It was not simple rebellion either, though rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon did break out at Mizpah, against the native governor and the foreign soldiers. This royal criminal had tasted blood, and he would carry on his reckless course, not caring whom he killed or why.
The dead included Babylon's own garrison, the Chaldeans. One writer traces the plot back to a foreign king and to Ishmael's own ambition.
Ishmael came with evil purposes, sent by Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, and pushed, no doubt, by his own ambition... He struck Gedaliah down like a coward, and so rebelled one last time against the king of Babylon's authority. He massacred the governor's followers and the Chaldean warriors who were there.
Ishmael's sword broke a promise the whole group had made.
Gedaliah had decided to stay in the land and to submit to the king of Babylon. He took an oath to this effect before these men, and required them to serve Nebuchadnezzar too. This was the wise thing to do. God had brought them down, so rebelling against Babylon would have meant rebelling against God.
These were the people who kept the land while others went into exile.
Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. Being in the right place without being right with the right Person only exposes us to bad behaviour and to the hypocrisy we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word, yet they acted deceitfully.
After the massacre the people feared what Babylon would do. So they ran toward Egypt, against the prophet's word.
Fear is just as certain a proof of unbelief as bold or treacherous rebellion, even if it is not as obvious. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon and not to flee into Egypt... How blessed for the believer that he may trample on his fears and trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!
- Forgotten — The root of it all is this: "God was not really in their thoughts." Everything else is fruit from that root.
- Jealousy — Ishmael seems to have wanted the governorship himself. That envy killed Gedaliah and everyone standing near him.
- Treachery — Royal descent should have made him the people's shelter; instead corruption ran its course "where it was least fitting."
- Rebellion — Killing Babylon's soldiers threw off the authority God had placed over Judah. To refuse that authority was to refuse Him.
- Fear — The survivors were in the right place but not right with the right Person. They fled to Egypt. Unbelief shows itself in panic as clearly as in violence.
And it came to pass the second day after he had killed Gedaliah, and no man knew it,
One day had passed since Gedaliah was killed at Mizpah, and no one outside the murderer's circle knew it. That secret gave the killer cover for his next crime, and it raises a question: where was God while the last leaders of His people turned to treachery?
What happened at Mizpah was not one man's private crime. It came out of a general collapse of order.
In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we see the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews who stayed in the land, or near it, after Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper and brings them the word of the Lord, but he finds among them the greatest unbelief… Even the little remnant, the poor left in the land, among whom Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans. They were full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
Scripture tells us Ishmael came from the royal line. That one detail shows how far the nation had fallen.
The Holy Spirit does not add "of the royal family" to Ishmael's name and kin for nothing. Normally and rightly this would have been a guarantee of help to a governor, and a support and shelter to the people. But they forgot God, and slighted His judgments and His will. Human corruption takes its course where it is least fitting. The ruin of Israel was complete. Its royal line had sunk into the lowest kind of cunning, treachery, and murder — and against the best of their own people.
The hidden murder gave Ishmael a free hand. No one raised an alarm, so he could keep killing — and by now his motive was more than politics.
It was not only jealousy of the good man who fell at his own table, suspecting nothing, after welcoming these agents of evil as guests. It was not simple rebellion either against the conquering king of Babylon, which then broke out against the native governor and the foreign soldiers at Mizpah. This royal killer had tasted blood. He would carry on his reckless course, not caring whom he killed or why.
The men who arrived on that second day were on their way to worship at the ruined temple site. Their devotion was mixed, but real, and it cost them their lives.
It even seems that people honoured the worship of the Lord again, at a time when the temple lay in complete ruin. At least there was a "house of the Lord" to which those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up… On the second day he killed men who had come to seek the Lord. Perhaps they were ignorant and not free from pagan practices, but their hearts were broken.
The horror had another side. God was taking the godly out of reach of worse evil, and their loss fell on the nation as punishment.
Who can doubt that God chose to take Gedaliah away from the evil to come, along with those who grieved over the ruins of Israel? It was mercy to them. It was also a further chastening on the guilty people, high and low, that the ones who acted and felt best of all should be swept away — and by their own brothers' hands.
For generations Israel kept a fast in the seventh month because of this murder. The reason they kept it is worth asking about.
The fast of the seventh month was kept on the anniversary of the murder of Gedaliah at Mizpah (Jeremiah 41). But why did they keep these fast days?… It was not for the honour and glory of God. Their own selfish interests were at the bottom of it. Indeed God had never asked them to fast.
These survivors were in the right place — the land itself. It did them no good.
Chapters 40-41 show up a mistaken idea. Being a remnant in the land — in the right place — does not by itself give anyone superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person is no help. It only leaves us open to bad behaviour and to ungodly hypocrisy, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.
- Secret — One hidden day was all the cover Ishmael needed. No one knew, so the killing went on.
- Seed — The murderer came from the royal line, the family that should have sheltered the people. Israel's ruin was complete.
- Sincere — The men who walked in were mourners on their way to seek the Lord, and they were the ones cut down.
- Spared — God took the godly away from evil still to come. That was mercy to them, and a further chastening on the nation.
- Situated — Being in the right place saved no one. Only being right with the right Person does.
that there came men from Shechem, from Shiloh, and from Samaria, eighty men, having their beards shaven and their clothes rent, and having cut themselves; with oblations and incense in their hand, to bring them to the house of Jehovah.
Ishmael had just murdered Gedaliah, the governor, and no one knew it yet. The next day eighty mourners came down from the northern towns with offerings for the temple — so why did God let them walk into a killer's hands?
These travellers knew nothing of the murder at Mizpah the day before. One commentator looks for Ishmael's motive and finds none left.
It was not only jealousy of the good man who fell at his own table, with no suspicion. There he had welcomed these wicked messengers as guests. Nor was it simple rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon that broke out at Mizpah against the native governor and the foreign soldiers. This royal outlaw had tasted blood. He would keep on his desperate course, not caring whom he killed or why.
The temple in Jerusalem lay in ruins. Even so, these men carried offerings "to present at the temple of the LORD."
People even seem to have honoured the worship of the Lord again, at a time when the temple lay completely destroyed and ruined. At least there was a "house of Jehovah" where those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up.
Their appearance was not random. Israel guarded the beard with care, so cutting it was a loud sign of grief.
The Israelites always cultivated the beard and prized it. The law forbade them to "mar the edges" of their beards (Leviticus 19:27). A priest was not to shave off the corner of his beard as a sign of mourning (Leviticus 21:5)… Ezra was in great grief at the sin of the people. He pulled out the hair of his head and of his beard (Ezra 9:3; compare Jeremiah 41:5).
The third sign is not like the other two. It came from outside Israel.
The law forbade this practice, and it forbade making any mark in the flesh. The nations around them did it. They cut themselves for the dead and tattooed their bodies in honour of their gods. The Israelites belonged to Jehovah (Leviticus 19:28; Leviticus 21:5).
Yet one commentator refuses to write these men off. He weighs their mistake against their hearts.
On the second day he killed these men. They may have been ignorant and not free from pagan practices, but they had broken hearts, and they had come to seek the Lord.
Ishmael killed them before they ever reached the temple. One commentator reads this not as an accident of history but as God's purpose.
Who can doubt that it pleased God to take away Gedaliah, and those who sorrowed over the ruins of Israel, before worse evil came? It was mercy to themselves. It was also a further chastening on the guilty people, high and low. Those who acted and felt best of all were swept away, and by the hands of their own countrymen.
These mourners were heading for the right place. The rest of the story shows that this on its own guaranteed nothing.
Chapters 40 and 41 expose a mistaken idea. Some think that a remnant in the land—in the right place—must have some superior standing. But being in the right place is not enough. If we are not right with the right Person, it will only expose us to bad behaviour and godless hypocrisy, as we see here.
- Mourning. Eighty men came grieving the ruin of Israel, in the accepted signs of the time: shaved beards and torn clothes.
- Mixture. One of their signs, cutting the flesh, was a pagan custom the law had banned — real sorrow carried in a wrong form.
- Motive. One writer still judges them gently: ignorant, maybe, but broken-hearted men who had come to seek the Lord.
- Mercy. God took the best away before worse evil came. That was mercy to them, and a further chastening on the nation left behind.
- Marker. Being in the right place is no safeguard; only being right with the right Person is.
And Ishmael the son of Nethaniah went forth from Mizpah to meet them, weeping all along as he went; and it came to pass when he met them, he said unto them, Come to Gedaliah the son of Ahikam.
Ishmael had murdered Gedaliah at Mizpah two days before, and no one knew. Then eighty pilgrims came down the road toward the ruined temple. The killer walked out to meet them in tears, and invited them to a governor who was already dead. What do tears prove, and what can they hide?
One writer weighs the motives behind that weeping. They had run past jealousy and politics.
It was not only jealousy of the good man who fell without suspecting anything at his own table, where he had generously welcomed these agents of evil. Nor was it simply rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon, which broke out at Mizpah against the local governor and the foreign soldiers. This royal criminal had tasted blood and would keep on with his reckless course, not caring whom he killed or why.
Ten of the eighty later bought their lives with hidden stores of wheat, barley, oil and honey. He killed the rest. The same writer names the trait behind that.
It adds to the horrors of the picture too, that Ishmael was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.
His tears matched what these travellers already felt. They had shaved their beards, torn their clothes and cut themselves. They carried grain offerings and incense. One writer describes the worship that had revived in the land, and who these mourners were.
The worship of the Lord even seems to have returned to honour, at a time when the temple lay completely destroyed and ruined. At least there was a "house of Jehovah" where those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up… On the second day Ishmael killed the men who had come to seek the Lord. They were perhaps ignorant, and not free from pagan practices, but their hearts were broken.
Scripture notes that Ishmael belonged to the royal family. One writer treats that detail as deliberate.
The Holy Spirit adds the words "of the royal family" to Ishmael's name and family, and that means something. Normally, and rightly, this would have been a guarantee of support to a governor, and a protection and shelter for the people. But God was forgotten, His judgments and His will alike ignored, and human corruption runs its course where it was least fitting. The ruin of Israel was truly complete when the royal line sank to the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder. And its victims were the best of their own people.
Why were the most sincere people in the land the ones cut down? Ishmael threw their bodies into a trench that king Asa had dug long before, when he feared attack. One writer reads two things at once in the loss.
Who can doubt that God was pleased to take Gedaliah, and those who grieved over the desolations of Israel, away from the evil that was coming? It was mercy to themselves. It was also a further chastening on the guilty people, high and low. Those who acted and felt most rightly were swept away — and by the hands of their own countrymen. What a disgrace! A trench dug for self-defence became the common grave of the best of the remnant, shamefully put to death like this.
These chapters describe the people left in the land, in what looked like the right place. One writer draws the lesson from this scene.
Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to godless hypocrisy, as we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word, but they acted deceitfully.
- False tears. Ishmael's weeping was not grief but bait. He had tasted blood, and no longer cared whom he killed or why.
- True tears. The eighty came with offerings and torn clothes. They truly mourned Israel's ruin, even if their practices were mixed — and their sincerity made them easy to trap.
- Royal shame. The murderer came from the royal family, which marks the ruin as complete. The line meant to shelter the people became its cruellest enemy.
- God's mercy in loss. God took the best of the remnant away from worse evil coming. Their deaths were also a further chastening on a guilty people.
- Place versus Person. Staying in the land, with God's prophet among them, gave no protection. Safety lies in being right with God, not in holding the right position.
And it was so, when they came into the midst of the city, that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, he and the men that were with him, slew them, [and cast them] into the midst of the pit.
Jerusalem has fallen, and Babylon has left a small group of Jews in the land under a governor named Gedaliah. Ishmael has already murdered him, and here he turns on eighty men who were on their way to worship.
This chapter sits in a part of Jeremiah that records the collapse of order among the Jews left in the land.
In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44 we see the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land and around it, after Babylon carried most of their brothers away as captives. Jeremiah becomes their helper and brings them the word of Jehovah, but he finds among them the greatest unbelief… Now even the little remnant, the poor people left in the land among whom Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
The killer was no outsider. He belonged to the royal family, and one writer shows what that should have meant.
The Holy Spirit adds to the name and family of Ishmael the words "of the royal family," and that description means something. By rights it should have guaranteed help to a governor, and support and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten, His judgments and His will ignored, and human corruption ran its course where it least belonged. The ruin of Israel was complete. The royal family had sunk to the lowest kind of cunning, treachery and murder, and against the best of their own people.
Ishmael met these men in tears and invited them to a governor he had already killed. We cannot explain this killing away as politics, or even as revenge.
This was not only jealousy of the good man who fell without suspicion at his own table, where he had welcomed these agents of evil as guests. Nor was it simply rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon, which then broke out against the native governor and the foreign soldiers at Mizpah. This royal outlaw had tasted blood and would carry on his reckless course, careless whom he killed or why.
Ishmael was not acting alone. One writer names who sent him, and what kind of people his victims were.
He came with evil purposes, sent by Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, and pushed, no doubt, by his own ambition… On the second day he killed the men who had come to seek the Lord. They were perhaps ignorant, and not free from pagan practices, but their hearts were broken.
The pit was not dug as a grave. Men had cut it for defence, and one writer finds in it both mercy and disgrace.
Who can doubt that God was pleased to take away Gedaliah, and those who sorrowed over the desolations of Israel, from evil to come? It was mercy to them. It was also an added chastening on the guilty people, high and low, that those who acted and felt most rightly should be swept away — and swept away by the hands of their own brothers. What a disgrace! A trench dug for self-defence became the common grave of the best of the remnant, put to death in shame.
Ten of the men bought their lives with hidden stores of food. One writer names the trait in Ishmael that saved them.
It adds to the horror of the picture too, that Ishmael was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.
These men died in the land, with the prophet Jeremiah living among the remnant. That is what makes the chapter a warning.
Chapters 40-41 expose a false idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must therefore have better qualities. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person only exposes us to bad behaviour and godless hypocrisy, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted with deceit. To call on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety.
- Cause — God forgotten. The remnant left in the land was full of jealousy, private plans, treason, deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
- Rank — no safeguard. Ishmael's royal blood should have made him a shelter for the people. Instead the royal line sank to cunning, treachery and murder.
- Tears — no proof. He wept as he went to meet the eighty men, and named a dead governor as their host. He had tasted blood and no longer cared whom he killed or why.
- Victims — the best of them. They came with broken hearts to seek the Lord. God was pleased to take those who grieved over Israel's ruin away from worse evil ahead.
- Result — a trench for a grave. A trench dug for defence became the grave of the best of the remnant, killed by their own brothers. Being in the right place is no safety without being right with the right Person.
But ten men were found among them that said unto Ishmael, Do not kill us, for we have hidden stores in the field, of wheat, and of barley, and of oil, and of honey. So he forbore, and did not kill them among their brethren.
Ishmael son of Nethaniah had murdered Gedaliah at Mizpah. Two days later he killed eighty men who came there hoping to meet Gedaliah, and verse 8 is the one crack in that slaughter: ten of them keep their lives by handing over food they had hidden in the fields.
The verse gives us no names, only a transaction. One summary of the chapter sets the moment in sequence:
The next day Ishmael met eighty men who came from the north; he invited them to come to Gedaliah, who was dead in his house. When they came to the place he killed them, except ten men, who offered to reveal to him hidden stores of food.
So the ten belonged to a group on pilgrimage, and they alone walked out of Mizpah alive.
The ten men lived because they had something Ishmael wanted:
It adds to the horrors of the picture too, that Ishmael was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.
Wheat, barley, oil and honey were enough to stop his sword. The hand that would not spare eighty men for pity spared ten for profit.
One writer traces Ishmael's deceit from the meal table to the road:
Ishmael came with ten men and killed Gedaliah and those who were with him, at Mizpah. This murder took place immediately after Ishmael had deceitfully eaten with Gedaliah. On the second day after this, 80 men came from Shechem, Shiloh and Samaria wanting to meet with Gedaliah. Ishmael met them, weeping, and guided them into the city, where Ishmael and his men killed them except for ten men who bribed Ishmael to let them live.
The weeping came first. The man who cried on the road took payment to spare ten of them.
What makes the greed worse is who is doing the bargaining. Scripture takes care to tell us Ishmael was of the royal line, and that detail is not filler:
The Holy Spirit adds "of the seed royal" to Ishmael's name and family, and that description means something. Ordinarily, and rightly, that royal descent would have been a guarantee of help to a governor, and a support and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten. His judgments and His will alike were slighted. Human corruption takes its course where it was least fitting. The ruin of Israel was complete. The royal line had sunk to the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder — and this against the best of their own people, God's own people in the good land, now a wasteland morally as well as physically.
A prince who should have sheltered the people sold them their own lives back instead. One reference work draws the plain conclusion about him: his "craft and ferocity show that he was unworthy of a throne."
Being alive was not the same as being safe. One writer looks at the whole group left in the land and asks what went wrong:
But how quickly evil developed in this remnant! If they had feared the Lord and thought on His name; if they had submitted to the rule of Nebuchadnezzar, who was the rod in the Lord's hand to punish Judah for her sins; if they had remembered that they were part of the guilty nation, and that all were caught up in the common ruin — all might have been well. ... But false ones got among them. In Jeremiah 41 the flesh runs wild. Conflict and confusion reign everywhere. Many fall. Some fall into bondage to the power of evil. Others, driven by the fear of man, run to Egypt for safety — the very world God had delivered them from by His own favour and mighty power. "In the fear of the Lord is strong confidence, but the fear of man brings a snare."
The survivors were in the land and the prophet Jeremiah was among them. It did them no good:
Chapters 40–41 expose a false idea. Being a remnant in the land — in the right place — does not by itself give anyone a higher standing. We can be in the right place and still not be right with the right Person. That only exposes us to bad behaviour and to godless hypocrisy, such as we see here. The prophet of God was among them. They pretended to value his word, and still they acted deceitfully. To call on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety, and for this the Holy Spirit of God is here: to lift Him high before the eyes of our faith.
- Greed — Ishmael's sword stopped for wheat, barley, oil and honey. Commentators see in verse 8 that he was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.
- Bargain — the ten did not receive mercy; they bribed a murderer. They bought their lives with the food they had hidden in the field.
- Royalty — the killer was of the royal line, the very family meant to shelter the people. When that line sank to cunning and murder, the ruin of Israel was complete.
- Bondage — living through the massacre was not the same as being safe. In this chapter the flesh runs wild, many fall, and some end up in bondage to the power of evil.
- Safety — the right place is not enough. They were in the land, with the prophet among them, and still acted deceitfully. Only calling on the Lord out of a pure heart keeps anyone safe.
And the pit into which Ishmael had cast all the dead bodies of the men whom he had slain by the side of Gedaliah was the one which Asa the king had made for fear of Baasha king of Israel Ishmael the son of Nethaniah filled it with the slain.
Ishmael murdered Gedaliah and threw the bodies into a cistern. Scripture then pauses to say who dug that cistern: King Asa, long before, to defend himself against Baasha. Why does that detail matter?
One writer describes the Jews left in the land after Babylon carried the nation away.
In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we have the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land or nearby. Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper, ministering the word of the Lord to them, but he finds among them the greatest unbelief. Their earlier unbelief had brought the crisis of destruction upon Jerusalem. But now even the little remnant, the poor left in the land, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
Those killed had mourned the ruin of the nation. One commentator reads their removal as mercy to them, and as a further blow to the guilty who survived.
Who can doubt that God was pleased to take Gedaliah away, and those who grieved over the desolation of Israel, from the evil that was coming? It was mercy to themselves. It was an extra chastening on the guilty people, high and low. Those who acted and felt best were swept away — and swept away by the hands of their own countrymen. What a disgrace, that a trench dug for self-defence should become the common burial place of the best of the remnant, killed in this shameful way!
That reading rests on a pattern seen elsewhere in Scripture.
The righteous remnant among God's people may perish, but "no man lays it to heart." Yet if the godly are taken away, it is a solemn sign. Judgment is about to fall, for "the righteous is taken away from the evil to come." It has always been so in the history of the world. As someone has said: "When the Lots are taken out of Sodom, it foreshadows a shower of wrath. Methuselah was taken away a year before the flood. We may conclude that when the Noahs are brought into their arks, it signals a deluge, and that God gathers His harvest before the world's storm, and calls His labourers home before the dark night comes on."
The words are from Isaiah 57:1. The ESV reads: "the righteous man is taken away from calamity."
Asa was a king who gave way to fear of Baasha, king of Israel.
Jeremiah 41:9 refers to a pit (or cistern) made by Asa "for fear of Baasha king of Israel." This is the last historical note about king Asa. In this passing way God would remind us where his decline began — "the fear of man, which brings a snare."
The ESV says Asa made the cistern "for defense against Baasha king of Israel." Older translations read "for fear of Baasha," the wording these writers follow. Another writer suggests what the pit was for.
In Jeremiah 41:9, we read of a pit which he made for fear of Baasha — probably to hide there. How this shows the weakness of man! After all the evidence of the Lord's mercy and power, Asa could forsake Him like this and enter an unholy alliance with a heathen king. He got what he wanted, and Baasha had to abandon his plan. But God had been a witness of it all.
One more trait completes the picture of the man who filled the pit.
It adds to the horror of the picture that Ishmael was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.
These people had stayed in the land. It saved no one.
Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must somehow be better qualified. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person only leaves us open to bad behaviour and ungodly hypocrisy. We see it here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word. Yet they acted deceitfully.
- Fear digs. Asa dug the pit because he was afraid of a rival king instead of trusting God — fear of man was where his decline started.
- Fear outlives. Generations later the pit was still there. Scripture's last word about Asa is this monument to his panic.
- Fear fills. What a king dug to save his own life became the mass grave of the best of the remnant, filled by a greedy and violent man.
- Mercy lifts. Those killed had mourned Israel's ruin. God took them away in mercy to themselves, and their loss chastened the guilty who remained.
- Place is no shelter. The right place protects nobody who is not right with God — not even with a prophet living among them.
And Ishmael carried away captive all the remnant of the people that were in Mizpah, the king's daughters, and all the people that remained in Mizpah, whom Nebuzar-adan the captain of the body-guard had committed to Gedaliah the son of Ahikam Ishmael the son of Nethaniah carried them away captive, and departed to go over to the children of Ammon.
Mizpah was where the survivors left in Judah had gathered around Gedaliah. In one stroke Ishmael empties the place, taking even the king's daughters, and the rest of the chapter answers whether the crime will stand.
Nebuzaradan had placed these people in Gedaliah's care. Ishmael takes them anyway and heads for Ammon. One writer ties the move to a plan already agreed with the Ammonite king, and then marks what God does with it:
Carrying on, it seems, the plans made with the king of the Ammonites, Ishmael next carries away those whom he did not kill… Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty at the moment of their greatest success.
Ishmael was not acting alone, and he was not acting only for himself. One account traces the whole sequence — the warning Gedaliah refused, the murders, the captives driven toward Ammon:
The captains of the forces that remained gathered around Gedaliah, with Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, of the royal family, at their head. But Ishmael came with evil intentions. Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, had sent him, and no doubt his own ambition pushed him on… He led captive all the rest of the people who were at Mizpah, along with the king's daughters, and took them to the Ammonites.
Another writer names the grievance behind it:
Jealousy, however, will spoil everything. A man of royal blood named Ishmael seems to have thought that he should have been appointed governor.
Scripture records Ishmael's royal descent for a reason. The detail measures how far Israel had fallen:
It is not a meaningless description that the Holy Spirit adds to the name and family of Ishmael, "of the royal family." Normally, and rightly, this would have promised help to a governor, and support and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten. His judgments and His will were ignored, and human corruption takes its course where it least belongs. The ruin of Israel was complete when the royal family sank into the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder — and this against the best of their own people…
Ishmael never reaches Ammon. One writer follows the story to its end:
However, Johanan and the captains of the forces with him free the captives from Ishmael, who flees to Baalis the king of the children of Ammon. Johanan and those he has delivered take refuge for a time at the inn of Chimham at Bethlehem, waiting for a chance to slip away into Egypt, because they fear the Chaldeans.
The rescue was real, but the rescuer was no safer a guide than the man he defeated:
The man who freed the captives and drove off their enemy was no true friend of Israel, because he paid little attention to the word of the Lord… Fear is just as much evidence of unbelief as bold or treacherous rebellion, even if it is less blatant. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt.
One writer sets what could have been beside what actually happened:
But how soon evil developed in this remnant! They could have feared the Lord and thought on His name. They could have submitted to the rule of Nebuchadnezzar, who was the rod in the Lord's hand to punish Judah for her sins. Then all might have been well… In Jeremiah 41 the flesh is rampant. Conflict and confusion reign supreme. Many fall. Some end up in bondage to the power of evil. Others, driven by the fear of man, seek refuge in Egypt — that world from which God had delivered them by His sovereign favour and mighty power.
The lesson drawn is that rescue is not the same as recovery:
Where there is much restlessness, though a measure of deliverance is experienced, as in the case of this remnant, yet, unless time is taken to learn and act on the present mind of God, worse trouble will follow than was known before.
- Trust betrayed. Nebuzaradan placed these people in Gedaliah's care. Ishmael seizes them and heads for Ammon.
- Trust exploited. The Ammonite king backed the plot, and Ishmael's own ambition drove it. Jealousy over the governorship played its part.
- Trust disgraced. The royal line should have sheltered the people. Instead it produced cunning, treachery, and murder.
- Trust restored. God disappoints the guilty at the height of their success. Johanan frees the captives, and Ishmael flees to the Ammonite king.
- Trust refused. Freed but fearful, the remnant heads for Egypt against the prophet's word. Fear is unbelief too.
And Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces that were with him, heard of all the evil that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah had done;
Jeremiah 41 has just described a massacre: Ishmael killed the governor Gedaliah and eighty men on their way to the temple, then took the rest of Mizpah captive. Verse 11 is the turn — news of it reaches Johanan and his captains, and the chapter moves from crime to rescue.
The phrase "all the evil" gathers a whole trail of bloodshed and betrayal into one summary. Here is the record Johanan was hearing about:
Son of Nethaniah, of royal descent, though we do not know which family. His craft and ferocity show that he was unworthy of a throne. He treacherously killed Gedaliah, whom the king of Babylon had made governor over the cities of Judah. He also killed all the Jews who were with him in Mizpah. He followed this crime with the cruel and treacherous murder of eighty men from Shechem, Shiloh, and Samaria. They were bringing gifts to the temple. He spared only ten. He then carried off everyone left in Mizpah as captives, and set out to go over to the Ammonites.
The rescue begins just as Ishmael's plan is working. He has the captives, and he is on his way to the Ammonites. The timing is the point:
Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty in the moment of their greatest success.
Ishmael himself got away, which can look like a failure of justice. But there is more than one way to punish a man:
It is true that Ishmael was not killed. Perhaps, for the moment, a more bitter cup for the conspirators was to return empty-handed and cheated of their prey. They had to face the king who had sent him out to destroy his own people and to plunder for the Ammonites.
Johanan carries the rescue in this verse. His record, read to the end, runs both ways:
Son of Kareah and captain among the Jews left in the land after the destruction of Jerusalem. He warned Gedaliah of the plot against his life. When Ishmael killed Gedaliah and carried the people away, Johanan was the means of rescuing them. He would not, however, listen to Jeremiah and stay in the land. Instead he led the remnant into Egypt, where they practised idolatry.
So the man God used here was not himself a man of faith. A few verses later he leads the rescued people toward Egypt. Fear drives him now, not malice:
Sadly, the one who delivered the captives and drove their enemy off was no true friend of Israel. He paid little attention to the word of the Lord… Fear is evidence of unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion, even if it is not as blatant. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt… What a blessing for the believer! He has every right to trample on his fears and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety.
The people were freed. But rescue is not the same as guidance:
This remnant did know a measure of deliverance. But where there is much restlessness, worse calamity will follow than before, unless people take the time to learn the present mind of God and to act on it. These things are recorded for our learning. The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people and it is the same today. How important, then, that we fix our eyes and hearts on the one unfailing Leader — the Lord Himself!
All of this happened to people who were in the land — the right place:
Chapters 40–41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — necessarily has some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to the kind of hypocrisy we see here.
- Evil peaks. Ishmael's crimes climbed from one murder, to eighty, to mass kidnapping. News of "all the evil" is what sets the rescue in motion.
- God interrupts. God lets shame and suffering run their course. Then He disappoints the guilty at the height of their success.
- Escape isn't acquittal. Ishmael slipped away, but going back empty-handed to the king who sent him may have been the more bitter cup.
- Rescuers need rescuing. Johanan freed the captives, yet he paid little attention to God's word. Fear is unbelief as surely as rebellion is.
- Deliverance needs direction. Being in the right place is not enough without being right with the right Person. Keep your eyes on the one unfailing Leader.
and they took all the men, and went to fight with Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, and found him by the great waters that are at Gibeon.
Ishmael son of Nethaniah had killed Gedaliah, the governor Babylon appointed, and marched the survivors of Mizpah off as prisoners. Johanan's men catch him at Gibeon — yet a successful rescue does not prove the rescuer is a godly man.
The chase happens in a land where all order has broken down.
In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we have the anarchy and moral disorder that prevailed among the Jews left behind in the land or nearby. Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper, ministering to them the word of Jehovah, but finds among them the greatest unbelief... now even the little remnant, the poor left in the land among whom Jeremiah remained, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
Older translations call the great pool of this verse the "great waters." The place is real, and it can still be traced.
Gibeon is identified with a village of scattered houses on a hill. On one side of the hill is a plentiful spring, and lower down the remains of a large reservoir, which is thought to be the "pool" of Gibeon and its "great waters." 2 Samuel 2:13; Jeremiah 41:12, 16.
Ishmael already had a record of bloodshed behind him.
Son of Nethaniah, of the royal line, but of what family is not known. His craft and ferocity show that he was unworthy of a throne. He treacherously killed Gedaliah, whom the king of Babylon had made governor over the cities of Judah. He killed all the Jews who were with him in Mizpah too. He followed up this crime by the cruel and treacherous murder of eighty men from Shechem, Shiloh, and Samaria, who were bringing gifts to the temple. Only ten were spared.
Ishmael had won. The governor was dead and the captives were his. That is the moment the pursuit caught up with him.
Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty in the moment of their greatest success.
Ishmael himself got away. No execution closed the account, but losing his prize may have hurt him more.
It is true that Ishmael was not killed. The king had sent him to destroy his own people and to plunder for the Ammonites. To go back to that king empty-handed, cheated of his prize, may have been for the moment a more bitter cup to the conspirators.
Johanan looks like the hero of the chapter. Earlier he had offered to kill Ishmael for Gedaliah, and Gedaliah turned him down.
It is not that Johanan was much better than Ishmael. As later events show, he had no real faith in God's word, and he hardened himself in pride and rebellion of heart. Perhaps Gedaliah knew there was little to choose between them. So he rejected Johanan's good warning just as much as his bad offer to get rid of Ishmael.
The same writer weighs the rescuer rather than the rescue:
Sadly, the man who delivered the captives and put their enemy to flight was no true friend of Israel. The reason was that he paid little attention to the word of Jehovah.
These survivors were still in the land while the rest sat in exile. That did not make them better people.
Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea. It is not true that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to ungodly hypocrisy such as we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word. Even so, they acted deceitfully.
Deliverance came to them, but it did not settle them.
Where there is much restlessness, some deliverance may still come, as it did for this remnant. But unless we take time to learn and act on the present mind of God, worse trouble will follow than before... The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people and it is the same today. How important, then, that our eyes and hearts should look to the one unfailing Leader — to the Lord Himself!
- The people. Those left in the land lived in anarchy and moral disorder: jealousy, treason, deceit, violence, and God absent from their thoughts.
- The place. The great pool of Gibeon is a real spring and reservoir. There Johanan's men caught up with the prisoners.
- The turn. God disappointed Ishmael at the height of his success. He escaped, but going back empty-handed to the king who sent him may have been the bitterer cup.
- The rescuer. Johanan freed the captives, yet he had no real faith in God's word. So he was no true friend to the people he saved.
- The test. Being in the right place counts for nothing without being right with the right Person. Look instead to the one unfailing Leader — the Lord Himself.
And it came to pass when all the people that were with Ishmael saw Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces that were with him, then they were glad.
Ishmael had murdered Gedaliah and was driving the survivors east toward the Ammonites as spoil. Verse 13 is where that march breaks: the captives see Johanan's troops and their hearts lift — but who they follow next will matter as much as who took them.
Johanan caught up with Ishmael at Gibeon. Its "great waters" were a real water source, and traces of them remain:
On one side of the hill is a plentiful spring. Lower down are the remains of a large reservoir. Many think this was the "pool" of Gibeon and its "great waters." 2 Samuel 2:13; Jeremiah 41:12, 16.
Ishmael had won every round so far. He had killed the governor, slaughtered pilgrims, and taken the rest as prisoners — and at that exact point the tables turned.
Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty in the moment of their greatest success.
Ishmael himself got away. But escaping with nothing is its own punishment:
It is true that Ishmael was not killed. But going back empty-handed, robbed of the prey, may have been a more bitter cup for the conspirators at that moment. It meant facing the king who had sent him to destroy his own people and to plunder for the Ammonites.
These people had watched Ishmael kill their governor and their neighbours, and they were prisoners on the road to a foreign people. One writer traces how the rescue came about:
Ishmael's presence meant the overthrow of Gedaliah. Johanan warned him of this, but Gedaliah treated it as a false suspicion. It was true all the same. Ishmael killed Gedaliah and those with him, and fled with the rest, after adding to his guilt by killing a company of worshippers on their way to the house of the Lord. Johanan heard what Ishmael had done, chased him, and recovered the glad and grateful remnant.
There is a sting in this rescue:
Sadly, the man who rescued the captives and drove off their enemy was no true friend of Israel. He paid little attention to the word of the Lord.
A short account of his life shows the pattern — brave first, then disobedient:
He warned Gedaliah about the plot against his life. After Ishmael killed Gedaliah and carried the people away, Johanan was the one who rescued them. But he would not listen to Jeremiah and stay in the land. Instead he led the remnant into Egypt, where they worshipped idols.
So the rescued people set out for Egypt. Kelly names what drove them there:
Fear shows unbelief just as certainly as bold or treacherous rebellion does, even if it is less blatant. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt. … How good it is that the believer has the right to trample on his fears, and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!
A rescue can leave people restless instead of settled. That is the danger Vine warns about here:
Restless people may still know some deliverance, as this remnant did. But unless they take time to learn God's present mind and act on it, worse trouble will follow than they knew before. … The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people, and it is the same today. So how important it is that our eyes and hearts should turn to the one unfailing Leader — to the Lord Himself!
- Cause. Ishmael won every round until his hour of triumph. Then God disappointed the guilty and left him fleeing empty-handed.
- Gift. The gladness at Gibeon was honest. A real rescue reached a glad and grateful remnant.
- Limit. Their rescuer was no true friend. He paid little attention to the word of the Lord. Brave is not the same as obedient.
- Result. Fear, not faith, chose their next step. Timid unbelief ends where bold rebellion ends.
- Remedy. After a rescue, take time to learn God's mind. Fix your eyes on the one unfailing Leader, not on the man who saved you.
And all the people that Ishmael had carried away captive from Mizpah turned about and came back, and went to Johanan the son of Kareah.
Jeremiah 41 has just described a massacre. Ishmael killed Gedaliah, the governor Babylon had appointed, and then marched the survivors of Mizpah off toward the Ammonites. Verse 14 is the moment that march breaks, and it raises a hard question: what is a rescue worth when the rescuer himself is not following God?
Up to this point, Ishmael's scheme has worked. One writer sets the rescue against the plans behind the kidnapping.
It seems that Ishmael is carrying forward the plans made with the king of the Ammonites. He goes on next to carry away those whom he did not kill… Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty at the very moment of their greatest success.
Another writer sums up the rescue, and how the freed people felt about it.
Johanan, hearing what Ishmael had done, pursued him, and recovered the glad and grateful remnant.
Verse 15 records that Ishmael slipped away. The murderer never faces trial. Yet one writer finds a judgement of another kind in that escape.
It is true that Ishmael was not killed. But he had to go back with nothing, cheated of the prey, to the king who had sent him to destroy his own people and to plunder for the Ammonites. For the moment that may have been a more bitter cup to the conspirators.
One reference work notes his family background, and what his behaviour showed about him:
Son of Nethaniah, of the 'royal seed,' though from which family is not known. His cunning and ferocity show that he was unworthy of a throne.
Johanan then led the freed people toward Egypt. That was the one direction the prophet had told them not to go. Escaping Ishmael did not put them in safe hands.
The man who rescued the captives and put their enemy to flight was no true friend of Israel, because he paid little attention to the word of the Lord… Fear is evidence of unbelief just as certainly as bold or treacherous rebellion is, though not as openly. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt… How blessed for the believer that he may trample on his fears, and trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!
The same writer looks at where that fear took them.
If they had stayed quietly in the land, under the authority of the Babylonian king whom God had placed over them, they would have been kept safe. But choosing human policy, they thought it was safer to go down into Egypt, whereas it proved to be the opposite.
Verse 14 brings real relief. Relief on its own changes nothing if no one stops to ask God what to do next.
Where there is much restlessness, some deliverance may still come, as it did for this remnant. Yet unless we take time to learn God's present mind and act on it, worse trouble will follow than before. These things are written for our instruction. The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people, and it is the same today. How important, then, that we turn our eyes and hearts to the one unfailing Leader — to the Lord Himself!
They had stayed in the land itself. One writer warns against reading too much into that.
Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant left in the land — in the right place — necessarily has some superior standing. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to the godless hypocrisy shown here. Even with God's prophet among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.
- Turn — The captives turned back and walked free; God disappoints the guilty at the very moment of their greatest success.
- Escape — Ishmael got away, but returned with nothing, which may have been the bitterer cup for those who sent him.
- Rescuer — Johanan freed them, yet ignored the word of the Lord. He was no true friend to the people he had just saved.
- Fear — Their flight to Egypt came from fear, and fear is evidence of unbelief just as surely as open rebellion is.
- Leader — Some deliverance is not enough. Without stopping to learn God's present mind, worse trouble follows. So keep your eyes on the one unfailing Leader.
But Ishmael the son of Nethaniah escaped from Johanan with eight men, and went to the children of Ammon.
Jeremiah 41 ends in confusion. Ishmael has murdered Gedaliah the governor and carried off the people, and Johanan has just won the captives back at Gibeon. Verse 15 tells us the ringleader himself got away. Why does God let such a man slip free, and what will the rescued people do now?
Ishmael did not run just anywhere. He ran back to the king who had sent him:
The captains of the forces who were left gathered around Gedaliah, with Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, of the royal family, at their head. But this man came with evil purposes. Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, had sent him, and no doubt his own ambition drove him on... Johanan and the captains of the forces followed him. They found him near the waters of Gibeon, defeated him, and took the captives back from him. Ishmael himself escaped with eight men and went to Baalis.
Ammon was no neutral refuge. God's law had long since shut that nation out:
"No Ammonite or Moabite may enter the assembly of the LORD. Even to the tenth generation, none of them may enter the assembly of the LORD forever"... Such is God's ordinance concerning them. Israel ought never to seek their peace nor their prosperity.
Ishmael kept his life. He kept nothing else:
It is true that Ishmael was not killed. But he had to go back with nothing, cheated of his prey, to the king who had sent him as a destroyer of his own people and a plunderer for the Ammonites. For the moment that may have been a more bitter cup for the conspirators.
The same writer sees a rule in it:
God sometimes permits the severest measures of shame and suffering. Yet even then He disappoints the guilty in the moment of their greatest success.
With Ishmael gone, Johanan looks like the hero. But he set out for Egypt, and one writer weighs him by another measure:
The man who rescued the captives and drove their enemy off was no true friend of Israel. He paid little attention to the word of Jehovah... Fear proves unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion does, even if it is not as shocking. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt.
This group had stayed in the land while the rest went to Babylon. Being there did them no good:
Chapters 40-41 show how false it is to think that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to ungodly hypocrisy, as we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word. Even so, they acted deceitfully.
Ishmael runs to Ammon; Johanan sets out for Egypt. Neither side waits on God:
This remnant did know a measure of deliverance. Yet where people are restless, and will not take time to learn God's present mind and act on it, worse disaster follows than before. These things are recorded for our learning. The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people, and it is the same today. So how important it is that we turn our eyes and hearts to the one Leader who never fails — to the Lord Himself!
- Escape plotted. Baalis, king of the Ammonites, sent Ishmael, and his own ambition drove him — a man of royal blood used to destroy his own people.
- Escape emptied. He kept his life but lost his prey; God disappoints the guilty at the very moment of their greatest success.
- Escape granted. Johanan won the captives back at Gibeon. But he had little regard for the word of the Lord, so the rescue settled nothing.
- Escape attempted. Johanan ran for Egypt out of fear — and fear is as real a mark of unbelief as open treachery.
- Escape refused. Being in the right place is not the same as being right with the right Person. Where no one waits to learn God's present mind, worse trouble follows than before.
Then Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces that were with him, took all the remnant of the people whom he had recovered from Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, from Mizpah, after he had slain Gedaliah the son of Ahikam, the mighty men of war, and the women, and the children, and the eunuchs, whom he had brought again from Gibeon;
Jeremiah 41 ends with a rescue. Johanan and his captains have caught up with the murderer Ishmael. The whole column of prisoners he had dragged out of Mizpah is now in his hands: fighting men, women, children, and the eunuchs who served at court. The question the chapter leaves open is what a rescued people will do next.
These chapters record what happened to the Jews who were not deported to Babylon.
In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we have the anarchy and moral disorder that took hold among the Jews who stayed behind in the land or near it. Most of their countrymen had gone as captives to Babylon. Jeremiah becomes their helper, ministering to them the word of the Lord, but finds among them the greatest unbelief. Even the little remnant was full of jealousy. These were the poor left in the land, and Jeremiah stayed among them. They were full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.
The people Johanan brought back from Gibeon had just lived through the murder of their governor and his followers. Ishmael was driving them off to the Ammonites.
Johanan, one of the captains, warned Gedaliah that treachery was being planned. Gedaliah refused to believe it, and refused to take part in killing Ishmael. Ishmael struck him down in a cowardly way, rebelling for the last time against the king of Babylon's authority. He massacred the governor's followers and the Chaldean soldiers who were found there. On the second day he killed men who had come to seek the Lord. They may have been ignorant, and not free from pagan practices, but their hearts were broken. He led captive all the rest of the people who were at Mizpah, along with the king's daughters, to the Ammonites. Johanan and the captains of the forces followed him, found him near the waters of Gibeon, defeated him, and recovered the captives from him. Ishmael escaped with eight men and went to Baalis, the king of the Ammonites.
Ishmael was at the height of his success when Johanan overtook him.
Even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty at the moment of their greatest success.
Verse 16 hands the people to Johanan. He beat Ishmael, but he was not a safe man to follow.
The one who delivered the captives and put their enemy to flight was no true friend of Israel, because he paid little attention to the word of the Lord... Fear proves unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion does, even if less obviously. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt. What came of this disobedience, flowing from distrust, we have yet to learn. How blessed for the believer that he is entitled to trample on fears, and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!
A real deliverance had just happened. What did not happen was any pause to ask God what came next.
God had set up the power and protection of Babylon. They did not settle quietly and confidently under it. Instead they moved toward Egypt, while still staying in the land. Fear filled their hearts, not quiet confidence in God and in His will. The conflicts they had seen only increased this. There was no waiting on God... This remnant did taste some deliverance. But where there is much restlessness, worse trouble follows than before — unless people take time to learn the present mind of God and act on it.
They still had the land, and the prophet still lived among them.
Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — necessarily has some superior standing. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to godless hypocrisy, as it does here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.
The same writer takes the failure of these captains into our own day.
The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people, and it is the same today. How important, then, that our eyes and hearts should be turned to the one unfailing Leader — to the Lord Himself!
- Rescued. At the exact moment of Ishmael's success, God disappointed him — the captives turned around at Gibeon and walked free.
- Rescued by whom. The captains who recovered them paid little attention to the word of the Lord. The people passed from a murderer's hands into unbelieving ones. Only one Leader never fails — the Lord Himself.
- Rescued, then restless. Real deliverance came, but no waiting on God followed it. Fear, not confidence, set the direction of the march.
- Rescued, but not right. They kept the land and kept the prophet. But the right place without being right with God only exposed their deceit.
- Rescued and warned. Jeremiah had told them to stay and submit, not to run to Egypt. Fear is as much unbelief as open rebellion. The believer may trample on fear and trust the word of the Lord.
and they departed, and dwelt at Geruth-Chimham, which is by Bethlehem, to go to enter into Egypt,
Jeremiah 41 ends with a group of survivors on the move. Johanan has just rescued them from a murderer. Now he leads them to a lodging place near Bethlehem, with Egypt in view. The chapter names their reason: they feared the Chaldeans, that is, the Babylonians. That fear is what the commentators weigh.
One writer traces the sequence from Ishmael's murder of Gedaliah — the governor Babylon had appointed — to this halt on the road.
Johanan and the captains of the forces with him free the captives from Ishmael, who escapes to Baalis, the king of the Ammonites. Johanan and the people he has rescued take shelter for a time in the inn of Chimham at Bethlehem. They are waiting for a chance to slip away into Egypt, because they fear the Chaldeans.
They never actually left the land. One writer notes that the move stayed inside the borders, yet aimed outward:
But they did not settle quietly and confidently under the rule and protection of Babylon, which God had set up. Instead they moved toward Egypt, while still staying in the land. Fear filled their hearts, not quiet confidence in God and in His will.
One commentator refuses to treat their fear as a small thing.
Fear is proof of unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion is, even if it is not as shocking. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon and not to flee into Egypt. What came out of this disobedience, which flowed from distrust, we have yet to learn. How blessed the believer is, who may trample on his fears and trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!
The lodging place in this verse belongs to a man named Chimham. He came from Gilead and was likely a son of Barzillai. Barzillai entrusted him to David when David returned to Jerusalem after his son Absalom's revolt (Morrish Bible Dictionary). One writer follows that thread and suggests a striking possibility, while admitting no one can prove it.
We do not know for sure, but could it be that David shared his own family estate at Bethlehem with him? We know that our King shares His kingly home with those who share His rejection. ... Some think this place should be called the "Inn of Chimham". They think that later, perhaps, it was this very inn that had "no room" for the King of Kings. So in its stable, at Bethlehem, the Son greater than David came into our world, rejected — as David had been rejected, in a smaller way, before Him. We cannot know for sure about this.
Only one of the two empires offered a way back. One writer contrasts the group heading for Egypt with the captives already in Babylon.
This group goes down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and there they are destroyed by sword, famine, and disease. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. This group takes Jeremiah with them into Egypt, even though he announces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon... At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. So going back to Egypt was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
Their calculation was that Egypt would be safer. It was not.
If they had stayed quietly in the land, under the authority of the Chaldean king whom God had placed over them, they would have been kept safe. But they chose human strategy instead. They thought it was safer to go down into Egypt, and the opposite proved true. Nebuchadnezzar chased the Egyptians and punished these unbelieving Jews in that land.
What is missing at Chimham is any pause to ask God. That absence, one writer argues, is what turns a rescue into a disaster.
There was no waiting on God. They had no sense of what God's mind for them was at that moment, even though His prophet was right there. Where there is much restlessness, people may still see some deliverance, as this remnant did. But unless they take time to learn God's present mind and act on it, a worse disaster will follow than the one they knew before.
- Rescued. Johanan won the captives back from Ishmael. The rescue was real, but it settled nothing about their next step.
- Afraid. They moved because they feared the Chaldeans. Fear like this is unbelief in a quieter form than Ishmael's open treachery.
- Halted. They stop at Chimham's lodging near Bethlehem, named after Barzillai's son. Some think — though no one can prove it — it was the inn with no room for the Son greater than David.
- Aimed wrong. God promised deliverance from Babylon. Egypt was the one road that could only end in sword, famine, and disease.
- Unasked. God's prophet stood right among them, and no one asked him. That silence, not the Babylonians, carried them into a worse disaster than the one they fled.
because of the Chaldeans; for they feared them, because Ishmael the son of Nethaniah had smitten Gedaliah the son of Ahikam, whom the king of Babylon had appointed over the land.
The chapter ends with Johanan and the survivors camped at Chimham near Bethlehem, with Egypt already in view. They were afraid of the Chaldeans — the Babylonians — because Ishmael had murdered Gedaliah, the governor Babylon had appointed. Their fear was real, but they made their plans without once turning to the Lord.
Johanan had just rescued the captives and driven off a murderer. One writer still puts his fear on the same level as Ishmael's treachery:
The man who rescued the captives and put their enemy to flight was no true friend of Israel, because he paid little attention to the word of the Lord... Fear is evidence of unbelief just as surely, if not as blatantly, as bold or treacherous rebellion. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt. What came of this disobedience, flowing from distrust, we have yet to learn. How blessed the believer is! He has the right to trample on fears, and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!
Chimham's lodging near Bethlehem was still inside the land. But they stopped there with another country in mind:
Johanan and those he has delivered take refuge for a time at the inn of Chimham at Bethlehem. They are waiting for a chance to slip away into Egypt, because they fear the Chaldeans.
Another writer names what was missing in their hearts:
They did not quietly and confidently settle under the power and protection of Babylon, which God had established. Instead they moved toward Egypt, though they were still in the land. Fear filled their hearts, and not quiet confidence in God and in His will.
Babylon's yoke looked like the danger. One writer shows what submitting to it would have secured:
If at this last hour this remnant had submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar, peace would have reigned in the land. These few who were left would have kept the land as their own. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no idea of trusting in the Lord. They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth. They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. But there they fall under the sword that would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there in subjection to the king.
One writer sets the two groups of survivors side by side — those heading for Egypt, and those already in Babylon:
These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and plague will destroy them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the present... God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt, but Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt, therefore, was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
One writer sums up the whole chapter, then sets two kinds of fear side by side:
In Jeremiah 41 the flesh runs wild. Conflict and confusion reign. Many fall. Evil takes some into bondage. Others, driven by the fear of man, seek refuge in Egypt — the very world God had delivered them from by His sovereign favour and mighty power. "In the fear of the LORD one has strong confidence" (Proverbs 14:26), but "the fear of man lays a snare" (Proverbs 29:25).
These survivors were the ones left in the land — and one writer refuses to treat that as an advantage:
Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualification. To be in the right place is not enough. Without being right with the right Person, we are open only to bad behaviour and to ungodly hypocrisy like the kind shown here.
- Fear — Their dread of Babylon after Gedaliah's death was real, but one writer calls fear like this evidence of unbelief.
- Flight — Fear never stands still. It left them camped at Chimham, with Egypt already their secret plan.
- Forfeit — If they had stayed under the yoke God appointed, they would have had peace and kept the land.
- Fatal refuge — Egypt was the house they had been redeemed out of; Babylon had a way home, Egypt did not.
- Faith — Standing in the right place saved no one. Only being right with God could do that.
And all the captains of the forces, and Johanan the son of Kareah, and Jezaniah the son of Hoshaiah, and all the people from the least even to the greatest,
The whole surviving community comes to Jeremiah at once, leaders and people together, and asks him to pray for them. Their request sounds humble, but the chapter raises a hard question: can anyone ask God for direction when their mind is already made up?
The chapters around this one show what these survivors were really like.
In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44 we have the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land or near it. Most of their brothers had been carried captive to Babylon. Jeremiah becomes their helper, ministering the word of the Lord to them, but finds among them the greatest unbelief. This hardness of heart was deeply sorrowful and heartbreaking to the prophet... even the little remnant were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. These were the poor left in the land, among whom Jeremiah remained. God was not really in their thoughts.
At first, their move looks exactly right.
They recognise the ruin of the nation; they own they are but a few. In the middle of the ruin, and in admitted weakness, they meet together to ask the Lord what path He would have them take and how He would have them act. What course could be more fitting than for a little company of God's people, in such circumstances, to turn to the Lord for guidance?
They ask Jeremiah to pray to "the LORD your God." One writer stops at that pronoun.
The people applied to the prophet to ask counsel about going down into Egypt. But they had already made up their minds about their course. They were bent on their own will. Miserable condition! Had they been meek and humble, they would not have needed to ask counsel in the matter. But they said to Jeremiah the prophet, "Let our plea for mercy come before you, and pray to the LORD your God for us" — why not say, the LORD our God?
Commentators agree that the request was not genuine enquiry but a search for endorsement.
Johanan and those with him ask him to pray for them so that "the LORD your God may show us the way we should go, and the thing that we should do." Now these men had already decided in the depths of their hearts to go down to Egypt. Their whole hope was that Jeremiah would confirm their secret purpose.
The same pattern is set alongside Balaam, who also asked God about a road he had already chosen.
They requested the prophet to pray for them so that they might have divine guidance about their path, when they had already made up their minds to go with their whole company to Egypt (Jer. 42). Let us beware of going to God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
Their destination mattered. Compare them with those taken to Babylon.
There is a particular interest in this short history, for the story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to that of the remnant in Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, to be consumed by sword and famine and disease. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty provisionally promised to them. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt though he pronounces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon... God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt, but Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
The reply did not confirm their plan.
The Lord's way is very plain. Does this little remnant want to be built up and established? Do they want to enjoy the Lord's presence with them, and the Lord's mercies? Then there is one condition they must meet. They must "still abide in this land." However great the failure, however complete the ruin, there would still be blessing for a little remnant — a few of many — as long as they remain on God's ground for God's people. Their king and leaders may have fled. The house of the Lord may be burned to the ground and the walls of Jerusalem broken down. Yet there would still be blessing for those who remained in the land.
- Ruin — The chapter opens on wreckage. Most of the nation was in exile, and the few left behind were full of their own plans, with God not really in their thoughts.
- Request — Their move looks right. A small, weak company gathers, admits it is "a few of many," and asks the Lord which way to go.
- Reservation — One pronoun exposes them. They say "your God" to Jeremiah, never "our God," while already bent on their own will.
- Refusal — They wanted confirmation, not counsel. Going to God with your mind already made up is a serious affront to Him.
- Rest — The answer was to stay put. Egypt was fatal — God had once redeemed them out of it. Blessing remained for the few who stayed on God's ground, however great the ruin.
came near and said unto Jeremiah the prophet, Let, we beseech thee, our supplication come before thee, and pray for us unto Jehovah thy God, for all this remnant (for we are left a few of many, as thine eyes do behold us);
Jerusalem has fallen. Babylon has carried off most of the nation. The few left in the land come to Jeremiah with what sounds like the best thing they could ask. The words are almost perfect. So this verse raises a hard question: can a prayer be right in every word and still be dishonest?
One writer counts the losses that left them so few.
Four hundred years had passed since the great division in Israel. Then came the events recorded in this chapter. By this date we find the people of God not only divided but scattered. One hundred and thirty years before, the ten tribes had gone into captivity and became lost among the nations. Repeated captivities had thinned the ranks of Judah, until at last the kingdom, as such, had ceased to exist.
They admit they are only a few, and they ask God which way to walk. Nothing could fit their situation better.
They recognise the ruin of the nation; they own they are only a few. In the middle of the ruin, and in admitted weakness, they meet together. They ask the Lord what path He would have them take and how He would have them act. What course could be more fitting than for a little company of God's people, in such circumstances, to turn to the Lord for guidance?
They send Jeremiah to a God they call his, not theirs. One commentator stops on that word as he quotes them.
But they said to Jeremiah the prophet, "Let our plea for mercy come before you, and pray to the LORD your God" — Why not say, the LORD our God? … "Whether it is good or bad," — How could the will of God be anything but good? — "we will obey the voice of the LORD our God."
(Note: the older translation reads "thy God" and "whether it be good, or whether it be evil".)
But the question was never really open. They wanted a signature, not a direction.
Johanan and those with him ask Jeremiah to pray for them, so that "the LORD your God may show us the way we should go." Now these men had already decided, deep in their hearts, to go down to Egypt. Their whole hope was that Jeremiah would confirm their secret purpose.
Another writer turns the same pattern into a warning.
The Jewish captains in the days of Jeremiah were afraid of the Chaldeans (the Babylonians). They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that they might have divine guidance about their path. But they had already made up their minds to go with their whole company to Egypt (Jer. 42). Let us beware of coming to God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious insult to the Divine Majesty!
Jeremiah does not fill the silence with advice of his own. He goes to God and waits.
However, Jeremiah turns to the Lord, receiving an answer after ten days. During these days he apparently has no communication with the people. He will not venture an opinion of his own about the way in which they should walk and act. He will wait for clear directions from the Lord (v. 7).
The answer came, and they refused it. Staying under the king of Babylon meant safety. Egypt meant the sword they were fleeing.
Still, this remnant could have submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar even at this last hour. Then peace would have reigned in the land, and these few who remained would have kept it. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no idea of trusting in Jehovah. They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth. They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. But the sword falls on them there — the very sword that would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed under the king.
- Right words. Asking God to show the way is the right prayer for a weak, scattered people who admit they are only a few.
- Wrong pronoun. They send the prophet to "the LORD your God," not our God — the relationship they lean on is his, not theirs.
- Settled will. Commentators agree that Egypt was already chosen. They only hoped the prophet would confirm a secret purpose.
- Honest servant. Jeremiah will not give an opinion of his own. He waits ten days for the Lord's answer.
- Refused answer. Staying in the land meant peace. In Egypt the sword they fled from found them. Guidance asked for and then ignored costs more than guidance never sought.
that Jehovah thy God may shew us the way wherein we should walk, and the thing that we should do.
After Jerusalem falls, a small, frightened group of survivors comes to Jeremiah and asks him to pray for direction. The request sounds right — but can anyone ask God for guidance when the decision is already made?
Everything about this looks right. They are broken, they admit how few they are, and they ask two things: which road to take, and what to do.
They see the ruin of the nation; they admit they are only a few. With ruin all around them, and openly weak, they meet together to ask the Lord which path He would have them take and how He would have them act. What could be more fitting than for a little group of God's people, in such a situation, to turn to the Lord for guidance?
In their request they call God Jeremiah's God, not their own. That small word points to a bigger problem.
The people went to the prophet for advice about going down to Egypt. But they had already made up their minds about their course. They were bent on their own will. Miserable condition! Had they been meek and humble, they would not have needed to ask for advice about it. But they said to Jeremiah the prophet, "Let our supplication be accepted before you, and pray for us to the Lord your God" — Why not say, The Lord our God?
When Jeremiah agrees to pray, they promise to obey whatever comes, good or bad. That eagerness is itself the warning sign.
How painful it is to see that the flesh gives itself away just as much by an excessive show of piety as by open godlessness! The experienced eye does not spot the hollowness in a lack of zeal. It spots it in a readiness to obey God's will — whatever that will may be — that is too abundant, or at least too self-confident. The duty may be plain. But what about the heart? What about the power to keep going and to see it through?
Another writer hears the same tone in people today.
Are there not those who speak like this small group of survivors? "Give us Scripture — give us the word of the Lord — and we will bow to it!" We may well fear that self-will lies behind such fair words.
Jeremiah will not fill the gap with his own judgment.
Jeremiah turns to the Lord, and the answer comes after ten days. During those days he apparently has no contact with the people. He will not venture an opinion of his own about the way in which they should walk and act. He will wait for clear directions from the Lord.
That silence becomes a rule for anyone still waiting on an answer.
When we seek guidance from God about any matter, and He delays to give it, let us remain where we are and do nothing, as the Lord Jesus did in John 11:6.
God does answer their question. The direction is simple, and blessing hangs on one condition.
They must "still remain in this land." However great the failure, however complete the ruin, there would still be blessing for the few who were left — a few out of many — as long as they stayed on God's ground for God's people. Their king and leaders may have fled. The house of the Lord may have been burned to the ground, and the walls of Jerusalem broken down. Even so, there would still be blessing for those who remained in the land.
Their minds were already set on Egypt. Refusing God's answer never ends in escape.
So God always carries out His will in the end. Happy are those who are in its current all the way through! If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment, and a short-lived success only makes that grief more bitter. Far from holding back the word of the Lord, they carry it out by the very steps meant to serve their own wishes. And the evils they dread most they bring on themselves for certain.
- Asking. Weak, few, and surrounded by ruin, they do the fitting thing: they gather and ask God for the path.
- Wording. They call Him "your God," not ours — the words expose a heart not truly meek before Him.
- Vowing. Over-eager promises to obey God, whatever He says, expose the flesh just as clearly as open godlessness.
- Waiting. Ten days pass; the prophet offers no opinion of his own, and neither should we move before the answer comes.
- Abiding. The answer was to stay on God's ground; refusing it brings on the very evils they were running from.
And Jeremiah the prophet said unto them, I have heard; behold, I will pray unto Jehovah your God according to your words; and it shall come to pass [that] whatsoever thing Jehovah shall answer you, I will declare it unto you I will keep nothing back from you.
The last Jews left in the land have asked Jeremiah to pray and tell them which way to go. He agrees, and promises to keep back nothing of God's answer — to people who have already decided where they are going.
Jeremiah takes these men at their word, with no sign of suspicion. One writer treats that openness as the mark of faith, not of weakness.
Real faith is unsuspicious, and it can afford to be so. The believer knows in whom he has believed. He can commit himself and others, the present and the future, to God. His grace has looked on us for eternity, and His righteous government notices every word and way and feeling and desire along the road… If strong promises could have assured the prophet, there were enough of them here. But he was not ignorant either of man or of Satan. His trust was in God, whether the Jew was true or false.
Another servant of God could later make the same claim about his own work. Telling people everything takes faith, because fear of them is what trims a message.
Further, he could say that they knew how he kept back nothing that was profitable. This needs faith, and without it faithfulness will fail. The apostle was altogether above the fear of man. He withheld nothing that was for their good. He announced it and taught it publicly and in their houses, testifying to both Jews and Greeks about repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ.
One small word in their request is worth noticing. They asked Jeremiah to pray to "the LORD your God" — not to their own God.
But they said to Jeremiah the prophet, "Please accept our plea, and pray for us to the LORD your God" — why not say, the LORD our God? — "for all this remnant (only a few of us are left out of many, as you can see); that the LORD your God may show us the way we should walk and the thing we should do." … "Whether it be good, or whether it be evil" — how could the will of God be anything but good?
Promising to report God's answer also meant refusing to supply one of his own.
However, Jeremiah turns to the Lord, receiving an answer after ten days. During these days he apparently has no communication with the people. He will not venture an opinion of his own as to the way in which they should walk and act. He will wait for clear directions from the Lord.
The people's reply to Jeremiah sounds like model submission. Their later conduct exposed it, and the very eagerness of the promise was the clue.
One thing, however, spoilt these fair words. As the later history shows, self-will was at work underneath their good words. They had already decided to take their own course. The self-will of the flesh betrays itself in their over-confident declaration that they were ready to obey the voice of the Lord… Are there not people who say, like this remnant, "Give us Scripture — give us the word of the Lord — and we will bow to it!" We may well fear that self-will lies behind such fair words.
The warning reaches past this one episode to the way we pray for guidance.
They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that they might have divine guidance about their path. Yet they had already made up their minds to go to Egypt with their whole company (Jer. 42). Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
- Ask — the remnant asked for the way to walk. Yet they kept saying "your God" to the prophet instead of owning Him as their own. The asking was real; the relationship was not.
- Promise — Jeremiah pledges the whole answer, with nothing held back. He does it without suspicion, because his confidence rests in God, whether the people prove true or false.
- Wait — for ten days he offers no opinion of his own. A messenger with nothing to hide also has nothing to invent.
- Tell — keeping nothing back calls for faith. Fear of man is what makes a servant trim the message.
- Obey — self-will can hide behind the most confident promise to submit to God's word. The test is not what we say before the word comes, but what we do when it cuts across our plans.
And they said to Jeremiah, Jehovah be a true and faithful witness amongst us, if we do not even according to all the word for which Jehovah thy God shall send thee to us.
Frightened survivors of Jerusalem's fall swear an oath before Jeremiah, calling God as their witness that they will obey whatever He says. The rest of the chapter tests that vow: what is a promise worth when the heart has already chosen?
An oath like this is as strong as words get. It makes God the witness against them, and ties their own welfare to obeying Him.
So this remnant makes the most solemn promise. Whatever the Lord's answer may be, they will "obey the voice of the Lord." They are right to see that, if they do, it will be well with them. However dark the day, however great the ruin, it will still be well with those who obey "the voice of the Lord."
The instinct behind it was right.
They recognise the ruin of the nation; they own they are but a few. Amid the ruin, and in admitted weakness, they meet together. They ask the Lord which path He would have them take, and how He would have them act. In such circumstances, what could be more fitting than a little company of God's people turning to the Lord for guidance?
One small word gives them away. They speak of God as Jeremiah's God, not as their own. One commentator breaks off mid-sentence to press the point:
"pray to the LORD your God for us" — Why not say, the LORD our God? — "for all this remnant, because we are left with but a few, as your eyes see us, that the LORD your God may show us the way we should go, and the thing that we should do."
They had fixed their course before anyone spoke.
Now these men had already decided in the depths of their hearts to go down to Egypt. Their whole hope was that Jeremiah would confirm their secret purpose.
This is not a harmless mistake.
They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that God would guide their path. Yet they had already made up their minds to take their whole company to Egypt (Jer. 42). Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
The loudness of the vow is itself the warning sign.
But how painful it is to find that the flesh gives itself away by an excessive show of piety just as much as by godless talk! The experienced eye does not spot its hollowness in a lack of fervour. It spots it in a readiness to obey God's will, whatever that will may be — a readiness that is too lavish, or at least too self-confident. The duty may be plain; but what of the heart? of the power to go on and to go through? Faith assumes we feel our own weakness just as surely as it counts on God and His grace. Human resolve in the things of God has force only where it is left to its own will.
The same pattern repeats today, in words that sound perfect:
Are there not people who talk like this remnant? "Give us Scripture — give us the word of the Lord — and we will bow to it!" We may well fear that self-will lies behind such fair words.
Jeremiah took them at their word and prayed.
Here the truth of the case comes out. Pride and self-will were at work. Their vows and promises were false. "You have gone astray at the cost of your lives," says Jeremiah, "for you sent me to the LORD your God, saying, 'Pray for us to the LORD our God, and whatever the LORD our God says declare to us and we will do it.'" God's answer would have suited them well enough if it had matched their own will. It ran against their will, so they rejected it altogether.
(The wording Mackintosh himself quotes here is "You were deceitful in your hearts" — which is the point he is making about their false vows.)
- Ask — in a day of ruin and weakness, turning to God for direction is the right instinct. The fault here is never in the asking.
- Own — they call Him "the LORD your God," not ours; the distance in the pronoun exposes distance in the heart.
- Decide — they had already chosen Egypt and only wanted it confirmed. Going to God with your mind made up is an affront to Him.
- Protest — the flesh gives itself away by loud promises, not weak ones. Real faith counts on God's grace because it knows its own weakness.
- Refuse — when the answer crossed their will, they rejected it. A vow that holds only when God agrees was never obedience.
Whether it be good or whether it be evil, we will hearken unto the voice of Jehovah our God, to whom we send thee; that it may be well with us when we hearken unto the voice of Jehovah our God.
Jerusalem has fallen, and the survivors left in Judah are frightened of Babylon and drawn toward Egypt. They ask Jeremiah to pray, and promise in advance to obey whatever answer God gives — but can a promise this complete still be a lie?
Their promise leaves nothing out: they accept God's answer before they have heard it.
This leads the remnant to make the most solemn declaration: whatever the Lord's answer may be, they will "obey the voice of the Lord". They rightly recognise that if they do so, it will be well with them. However dark the day, however great the ruin, it will still be well with those who obey "the voice of the Lord."
The pairing of "good or bad" is itself odd, and one writer stops on it. He also notes what stands behind such wording — a decision already taken.
They had already made up their minds as to their course. They were bent on their own will. Miserable condition! … But they said to Jeremiah, "Pray for us to the Lord your God" — why not say, the Lord our God? … "Whether it is good or bad" — how could the will of God be anything but good?
The strength of their language is not the reassurance it looks like.
But how painful it is to prove that the flesh betrays itself quite as much by its excessive show of piety as by open irreverence! The experienced eye does not detect its hollowness by any lack of fervour. It sees it in a readiness to obey the divine will, whatever it may be — a readiness too lavish, or at least too self-confident. The duty may be plain; but what of the heart? What of the power to go on and to go through? Faith supposes a sense of our own weakness as surely as it counts on God and His grace.
They were promising with their mouths. God was reading their motive. One writer turns that into a question for anyone who wants to know God's will.
If we desire to know the will of God, let us first seriously test ourselves as to why. Do we want to find out whether it is acceptable to us or not? Or do we really desire to practise God's will? Of course God knows our motives. The remnant of Israel came to Jeremiah and asked him to enquire of God. They told him they would obey God's Word without fail once He gave it (Jer. 42:5-6). But God knew they were deceiving themselves in their hearts (v. 20), and that they only intended to obey if it suited their thoughts. If we have no honest intention of doing God's will, or at least of being willing to do it, God will never give us firm conviction about the teaching of His Word.
Ten days passed before God replied. What He asked was not harsh — and the promise of verse 6 collapsed anyway.
The prophet undertook to tell them all that God made known. They, on their part, undertook to obey the voice of the Lord, whether it was good or bad (vv. 4-6). After ten days the Lord told them to stay in the land, and He would bless them richly (vv. 7-12). But if they went down into Egypt, the sword, the famine and the plague would overtake them there (vv. 13-18). The Lord knew their deceitful hearts, and the prophet plainly said to them, "You have deceived yourselves in your hearts when you sent me to the Lord" (vv. 19-22).
Refusing God's answer does not cancel it.
So God in the long run always accomplishes His will. Happy are those who are in its current the whole way through! If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment, and passing success only makes it more bitter. Far from hindering the word of the Lord, they carry it out by the very measures meant to give effect to their own wishes. The evils they most dread they bring certainly on themselves.
- Promise. They pledged to obey God's answer before they heard it. It is well with those who obey His voice, however dark the day.
- Wording. They called Him Jeremiah's God rather than their own, and allowed that His will might be "bad". The divided heart shows in both.
- Tell. A too-confident readiness to obey "whatever it may be" is a warning sign. Real faith carries a sense of its own weakness.
- Test. God reads motives, not phrasing. Without an honest intention to do His will, His Word never becomes settled certainty in us.
- Outcome. God carries out His will either way. Resisting it only brings down on us the very thing we were running from.
And it came to pass at the end of ten days, that the word of Jehovah came unto Jeremiah.
For ten days after Jeremiah prayed, nothing happened — no word, no message, no advice. That silence raises two questions. What does a servant of God do while God says nothing? And what were the people doing with their hearts in the meantime?
Jeremiah said nothing to the people for ten days. He had nothing from God to say yet.
Jeremiah turns to the Lord and receives an answer after ten days. During those days he seems to have no contact with the people. He will not venture an opinion of his own about the way they should walk and act. He will wait for clear directions from the Lord.
The people had not come to Jeremiah for advice.
The prophet himself waits till the divine answer comes: it was no question of his wisdom, but of God's word.
The delay also worked on the people. They had asked Jeremiah to pray while their own plans were already fixed.
Ten days pass before the answer comes to Jeremiah (42:7). This allows time to reflect on the hypocrisy of asking for prayer about direction... The advice is clear. But Johanan and his companions had already reached their decision. So they answer at once: "You speak falsely! The Lord our God has not sent you to say, 'Do not go to Egypt to sojourn there'" (43:2).
The silence did end. When the answer came, everything turned on one thing — where they stayed.
The Lord's way is very plain. Does this little remnant want the Lord to build them up and establish them? Do they want to enjoy His presence with them and His mercies? Then there is one condition they must meet. They must remain in this land. However great the failure, however complete the ruin, there would still be blessing for a small remnant — a few out of many. But they had to stay on God's ground for God's people.
Trouble draws out one of two things in us.
Faith accepts the chastening of sin, yet still trusts in God and His grace. Unbelief is full of resources. They are merely the workings of a rebellious heart, and they secure nothing but ruin for anyone they carry away.
Their promise to obey sounded good. That confidence was the warning sign.
One thing spoilt these fine words. As the later history shows, self-will was at work underneath them. They had already decided to take their own course. The self-will of the flesh gives itself away in their over-confident promise to obey the voice of the Lord. How often since that day has the flesh shown itself by the confident word that betrayed the self-will of the heart.
The problem was not their plan. It was going to God with the plan already fixed.
Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
This leaves a rule for anyone praying about a decision and hearing nothing back.
Sometimes we seek guidance from God about a matter, and He delays to give it. Then let us stay where we are and do nothing, as the Lord Jesus did in John 11:6.
Not knowing God's mind can feel like weakness. That feeling makes us restless.
Where we have no clear expression of the mind of God, it is always our place to wait till we have. Sometimes it may show our weakness that we do not know the mind of God, and this is distasteful to us. Restlessness would like to go somewhere, or do something, but this is not faith. Faith proves itself in waiting for God to manifest His will.
- Wait — the servant. Jeremiah offered no opinion for ten days; the question was never his wisdom, but God's word.
- Wait — the test. The ten days exposed hypocrisy. They had asked for prayer about a course already chosen.
- Wait — the answer. When the word came, God tied blessing to one condition: remain in the land, on God's ground.
- Wait — the refusal. Their confident promise to obey masked self-will, and the loudness of the promise was the clue.
- Wait — the rule for us. When God delays guidance, stay where you are and do nothing. Restlessness is not faith. Faith proves itself by waiting.
And he called Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces that were with him, and all the people from the least even unto the greatest,
After Jerusalem fell, the few people left in the land lost their governor to murder and came to Jeremiah for guidance. This verse is where the answer arrives: ten days later, Jeremiah calls the leaders and every last person to hear it.
The word came to Jeremiah after ten days. Only then did he call them together. Until it came, he had nothing to say.
The prophet himself waits till the divine answer comes: it was no question of his wisdom, but of God's word. Earlier He had urged them to submit to the king of Babylon. Now He warns them just as firmly not to flee into Egypt for protection. Faith accepts the chastening of sin, yet still trusts in God and His grace. Unbelief is full of resources. They are only the workings of a rebellious heart, and they secure nothing but ruin for those they carry away. If they believed, low as their condition was, they need not rush; they would surely be established. They would be in the hand of the One who could turn Nebuchadnezzar's heart toward them. Why should their enemies terrify them?
The crowd that came to ask is the crowd Jeremiah calls back to listen. Nobody is too small. And counting them up forced an admission.
"All the people from the least to the greatest, came near." Yet counting the least with the greatest, they have to admit they are only a remnant. They say, "we are left but a few of many."
The difficulty was not that they failed to ask. It was that the asking was for show.
Now these men had already decided in the depths of their hearts to go down to Egypt. Their whole hope was that Jeremiah would confirm their secret purpose.
The same trap waits for anyone who prays about a decision already made.
They asked the prophet to pray that God would guide them on their path. But they had already made up their minds to go to Egypt with their whole company (Jer. 42). Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
The answer Jeremiah gives that assembly is short: stay in the land. Everything turns on that one condition.
If this little remnant want to be built up and established, and to enjoy the Lord's presence and the Lord's mercies, there is one condition they must meet. They must "still abide in this land." However great the failure, however complete the ruin, there would still be blessing for a little remnant — a few of many. But it depended on their staying on God's ground for God's people. Their king and leaders may have fled. The house of the Lord may lie burned to the ground, and the walls of Jerusalem broken down. Even so, blessing remained for those who stayed in the land.
They went to Egypt anyway, and took the prophet with them. The comparison with the group already carried off to Babylon is stark.
This short history holds a particular interest. The story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to that of the remnant in Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and pestilence will consume them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt though he pronounces their doom. God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
- Wait. Jeremiah says nothing for ten days. The issue was never his wisdom but God's word.
- Call. When the word comes, Jeremiah summons everyone who asked — leaders and people, least and greatest. The answer belongs to them all, not to the captains alone.
- Ask honestly. These men had already settled on Egypt. They only wanted the prophet to approve it. Going to God with your mind made up is an affront to Him.
- Stay. Blessing remains for even a tiny remnant, on one condition: they stay on God's ground. The ruin around them changes nothing.
- Choose. They went to Egypt anyway. From Babylon there was deliverance; from Egypt, sword, famine and pestilence.
and said unto them, Thus saith Jehovah the God of Israel, to whom ye sent me to present your supplication before him
The nation has collapsed, and the frightened survivors have begged Jeremiah to pray for direction. Ten days later he calls them together, and his opening words name both who speaks and who asked.
Jeremiah did not answer at once. He chose to wait.
Jeremiah turns to the Lord, receiving an answer after ten days. During these days he appears to have no contact with the people. He will not offer an opinion of his own about the way they should walk and act. He waits for clear directions from the Lord.
These people had chosen their own messenger, and they chose him because they trusted him.
The remnant were the few who were left after the terrible events recorded in the previous chapter. They were now thrown upon the Lord, and they begged the prophet to pray for them: "that the LORD your God may show us the way we should go, and the thing that we should do." They believed in Jeremiah as a man of God. He promises to do so, and when the answer comes he will not hold anything back.
The phrase also throws their own request back at them. They had sent him — and they had sent him knowing what they wanted to hear.
Johanan and those with him ask him to pray for them. Now these men had already decided in the depths of their hearts to go down to Egypt. Their whole hope was that Jeremiah would confirm their secret purpose.
The same danger meets anyone who prays about a decision already settled in his own mind.
But here an all-important moral point comes in, and that is the whole condition of our soul. We may be sure this has much to do with the matter of guidance. It is "He leads the humble in what is right, and teaches the humble his way." If only we are humble and self-distrusting, if we wait on our God with a simple heart, an upright mind, and honest purpose, He will certainly guide us. But it will never do to go and ask counsel of God about a matter where our mind is made up, or our will is at work.
Every promise that followed rested on one condition.
The Lord's way is very plain. Does this little remnant want to be built up and established? Do they want to enjoy the Lord's presence with them and the Lord's mercies? Then there is one condition they must meet. They must "remain in this land." However great the failure, however complete the ruin, there would still be blessing for a little remnant — a few out of many. That blessing held so long as they remained on God's ground for God's people. Their king and leaders may have fled. The house of the Lord may be burned to the ground and the walls of Jerusalem broken down. Yet there would still be blessing for those who remained in the land.
The choice in front of them was not Judah or Egypt. It was trust or self-rescue.
The prophet himself waits until the divine answer comes. It was no question of his wisdom, but of God's word. God now warns them firmly against fleeing to Egypt for protection, just as He had earlier told them to submit to the king of Babylon. Faith accepts the chastening of sin, yet still trusts in God and His grace. Unbelief is full of resources. They are merely the workings of a rebellious heart, and they secure nothing but ruin for those who are carried away by it. If they believed, low as their condition was, they need not rush. They would surely be established, for they would be in the hand of the One who could turn the heart of Nebuchadnezzar toward them.
The lesson reaches past this remnant to believers now.
This is an important lesson for believers who go here and there in their restless efforts to find an easy path. They do not abide in Christ where God has set them. We are not left to choose our own way; we are to remain in the path of God's will and not depart from it. There are difficulties, no doubt. There were difficulties for this remnant. Still, we are to abide in Christ. To do otherwise is to increase the difficulties for ourselves and others.
- Sent — "to whom you sent me" marks Jeremiah as a messenger, not an adviser; the weight of the answer rests on the One who sent it.
- Waited — he gave no opinion for ten days, refusing to substitute his own wisdom for God's word.
- Withheld nothing — he promised to pass on the whole answer and hold nothing back.
- Exposed — they had already decided for Egypt. Asking for counsel with your mind made up is not seeking guidance.
- Abide — the one condition of blessing was staying where God had put them. Restless escape only adds to the trouble it runs from.
If ye will still abide in this land, then will I build you, and not overthrow [you], and I will plant you, and not pluck [you] up; for I repent me of the evil that I have done unto you.
Jerusalem had fallen. The few people left in Judah were afraid of what Babylon would do to them next. So they asked Jeremiah to bring their case to God. The answer, when it came, hung on a single condition — and it promised to reverse everything the nation had just suffered.
Jeremiah gave no advice of his own while he waited for God to speak. One writer notes the waiting and the answer that came.
The prophet himself waits until the divine answer comes: it was not a question of his wisdom, but of God's word. God had urged them before to submit to the king of Babylon. Now He warns them just as firmly not to flee to Egypt for safety. Faith accepts the chastening of sin, yet still trusts God and His grace. Unbelief is full of resources. They are all just the workings of a rebellious heart, and they secure nothing but ruin for anyone they carry away.
Everything promised here rests on the opening "if." God did not ask the survivors to rebuild the city or the temple. He asked them to stay where He had put them.
The Lord's way is very plain. Does this little remnant want to be built up and established? Do they want to enjoy the Lord's presence with them and the Lord's mercies? Then there is one condition they must meet. They must "remain in this land." However great the failure, however complete the ruin, blessing was still there for a little remnant — a few out of many. But only so long as they stayed on God's ground for God's people. Their king and leaders may have fled. The house of the Lord may lie burned to the ground, and the walls of Jerusalem broken down. Even so, blessing remained for those who stayed in the land.
Build, pull down, plant, pluck up — God had used the same four words earlier in Jeremiah, in a promise to those already carried away from Judah. The verse also ends with God relenting of the disaster He Himself had brought. One writer shows how that judgment and God's favour fit together.
The goodness of those carried away from Judah rested on this: they had submitted to God's judgment on their wickedness. This same principle holds true for us, only, thanks be to God, we have suffered our judgment in the person of Christ, condemned in our place on the cross. Once God had carried out the sentence, He could look down with favour on the people who had borne it. "I will set my eyes on them for good... I will build them and not pull them down, and I will plant them and not pluck them up" (Jer. 24:6).
This promise was never taken up. The men who asked for guidance had already made their choice before Jeremiah spoke.
They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that God would guide them about their path. But they had already made up their minds to go to Egypt with their whole company (Jer. 42). Let us beware of ever going to God with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
Their flight to Egypt did not cancel God's word; it fulfilled it against them.
So in the end God always does what He wills. Happy are those who move with that current all the way through! If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment, and short-lived success only makes it more bitter. Far from hindering the word of the Lord, they carry it out by the very steps meant to serve their own wishes. And the evils they dread most, they bring on themselves without fail.
One writer draws the lesson wider than this one remnant.
Is not this the great lesson? However great the ruin, however divided and scattered the people of God, those who still remain on God's ground for all God's people will find blessing. In other words, in spite of all failure, the way of blessing is still to walk in the light of what is true for the whole church of God. Refuse every other ground.
- Condition. The whole promise turns on "if you will remain." One condition, and every blessing hung on it.
- Promise. Build not pull down, plant not pluck up. God offered to undo His own judgment for a remnant with nothing left but the ground He gave them.
- Ground. Ruin did not change the place of blessing. Temple burned, walls broken, king gone — and still the land was where God would build.
- Submission. God looked with favour on those who bowed to His judgment. Faith accepts the chastening of sin and still trusts His grace.
- Refusal. Going to God with your mind already made up insults Him. Resistance never blocks His word. It only brings on the resister the very evil he feared.
Be not afraid of the king of Babylon, of whom ye are afraid be not afraid of him, saith Jehovah; for I will be with you to save you, and to deliver you from his hand.
God speaks this promise to a small group of survivors left in Judah after Jerusalem fell. They were terrified that Babylon's king would take revenge for the murder of the governor he had appointed. God names their fear twice, tells them to drop it, and gives one reason only: His own presence with them.
One writer looks back at where this remnant went wrong, and at how often God had already reassured them:
Nebuchadnezzar was the rod in Jehovah's hand to punish Judah for her sins. If they had submitted to his rule, all might have been well. If they had remembered that they were part of the guilty nation, and that all were caught up in the common ruin, all might have been well. The promise to Jeremiah in Jeremiah 15:11-14 applied to them. God assured them of His protection and blessing again and again (Jer. 39:10; Jer. 42:7-12). But false ones got among them... others, moved by the fear of man, seek refuge in Egypt — the very world God had delivered them from by His sovereign favour and mighty power.
Jeremiah did not answer at once. He had no opinion to offer, only a word from God to wait for.
The prophet himself waits till the divine answer comes: it was no question of his wisdom, but of God's word... Faith accepts the chastening of sin, yet still trusts God and His grace. Unbelief is never short of plans. They are all merely the workings of a rebellious heart, and they bring nothing but ruin on those they carry away. If they believed, they need not hurry, low as their state was. God would certainly establish them. They would be in the hand of the One who could turn Nebuchadnezzar's heart toward them.
The safety on offer was not distance from the king. It was God's hand on the king's heart.
The words "do not fear" come with a place attached. The promise holds in the land, and nowhere else.
The Lord's way is very plain. Does this little remnant want the Lord to build them up and establish them? Are they to enjoy His presence with them and His mercies? Then there is one condition they must meet. They must "still abide in this land." However great the failure, however complete the ruin, there would still be blessing for a little remnant — a few out of many. But they had to remain on God's ground for God's people. Their king and leaders may have fled. The house of the Lord may lie in ashes and the walls of Jerusalem in ruins. Even so, there would still be blessing for those who remained in the land.
"I am with you, to save you and to deliver you from his hand" tells them who wants the job of rescuing them. Egypt was the rival offer.
To go down into Egypt for safety was not natural in those who had always reluctantly bowed to Babylon... But then the prophet gave them the word of Jehovah. That word assured them of safety in the land under Nebuchadnezzar, and of destruction in Egypt. Egypt was still where their impulse — indeed their determination — was to go for shelter. After that word, the step was fatal. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they desert Him for another, woe to them!
They had asked for guidance, but the asking was a formality. One writer holds this up as a pattern to avoid:
Sometimes we seek guidance from God about a matter, and He delays to give it. Then let us stay where we are and do nothing, as the Lord Jesus did in John 11:6. The Jewish captains did the opposite. They asked Jeremiah to seek guidance for them from Jehovah, and they had already made up their minds to go down into Egypt.
Refusing the promise did not cancel it; it only moved them into the very danger they were running from.
So God in the long run always accomplishes His will. Happy are they who are in its current all the way through! If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment, and short-lived success only makes that grief more bitter. Far from hindering the word of Jehovah, they only fulfil it by the very measures meant to serve their own wishes. And the evils they dread most, they bring on themselves without fail.
- Ground. Blessing hung on one condition: stay in the land God had left them in, however ruined it looked.
- Gift. There God pledged Himself, not better circumstances: "I am with you, to save you." He loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name.
- Reach. His hand reached over the feared king himself. He could turn Nebuchadnezzar's heart toward them.
- Refusal. They had decided on Egypt before they ever asked. Asking God with your mind made up is not seeking guidance.
- Result. God does His will either way. Those who resist bring on themselves the very evils they fled from.
And I will grant mercies to you, that he may have mercy upon you, and cause you to return to your own land.
God's answer to the frightened survivors in Judah ends with a promise: He will show them mercy, and the very king they are running from will show them mercy too. Could people who had just watched Jerusalem fall believe that a conqueror's heart was in God's hand?
The last chapters of Jeremiah deal with the leftovers of a nation — the poor who were not deported to Babylon. What they were like explains why such a generous promise was wasted on them.
This is the first of a series of chapters that show the disorder and moral confusion among the Jews left behind in or near the land when the rest were carried away captive to Babylon. Judgment by the hand of man has no softening effect on those who ignore the word of God. We shall find that those who would not bow to the Lord's discipline were false and treacherous in their dealings with their own countrymen.
This mercy came with a condition. It rested on the words that opened the promise a few verses earlier: stay in the land.
The Lord's way is very plain. If this little remnant want to be built up and established; if they are to enjoy the Lord's presence with them and the Lord's mercies, there is one condition they must meet. They must "remain in this land." However great the failure, however complete the ruin, there would still be blessing for a little remnant — a few out of many — as long as they stayed on God's ground for God's people. Their king and leaders may have fled. The house of the Lord may lie burned to the ground and the walls of Jerusalem broken down. Still there would be blessing for those who stayed in the land.
The verse links two mercies. God shows mercy, and so the king shows mercy. Their safety did not rest on the king's mood. It rested on the One who holds his heart.
Faith accepts the discipline that sin brings, yet still trusts in God and His grace. Unbelief is never short of ideas, but they are all just the workings of a rebellious heart. They secure nothing but ruin for those whom unbelief carries away. If they believed, low as their state was, they had no need to hurry. They would surely be established, for they would be in the hand of Him who could turn the heart of Nebuchadnezzar toward them.
God later did this at Babylon's own throne. A king of Babylon brought Judah's imprisoned king Jehoiachin out of jail and gave him a seat above the other captive kings.
God was showing in Jehoiachin's case that He has the hearts of all men under His control. Long years of suffering may be turned, whenever He wills, into a peaceful end of life.
They had already been told twice to submit to Babylon. One thing kept overruling the promise.
All might have been well if they had feared the Lord and thought about His name. All might have been well if they had submitted to Nebuchadnezzar, the rod in the Lord's hand to punish Judah for her sins. All might have been well if they had remembered that they were part of a guilty nation, sharing in its ruin… Instead, the fear of man moved some to look for safety in Egypt — the world God had rescued them from by His sovereign favour and mighty power. "In the fear of the Lord one has strong confidence, but the fear of man lays a snare."
Refusing the offered mercy did not get them out of danger. It delivered them into it.
If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment, and short-lived success only makes it more bitter. Far from stopping the word of the Lord, they carry it out by the measures meant to get their own way. The evils they dread most, they bring on themselves without fail.
Fear was not their only problem. Their request for prayer was not honest.
They asked the prophet to pray that God would guide them about their path. They had already made up their minds to go to Egypt with their whole company. Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
(Some translations end the verse "cause you to return to your own land." The ESV reads "let you remain in your own land.")
- Mercy offered. God promised to build up and establish a ruined, disorderly few. Blessing outlived the collapse of everything else.
- Mercy conditioned. The whole promise rests on one word: stay. Blessing depended on staying on God's ground, not on better circumstances.
- Mercy delivered. God's mercy reached them through Nebuchadnezzar. The conqueror's heart was in the hand of the God who holds all men's hearts.
- Mercy refused. Fear of man, not lack of light, drove them to Egypt — the very world God had once rescued them from.
- Mercy tested. They asked for guidance with their minds made up. That is an affront to God, not a prayer.
But if ye say, We will not dwell in this land; so as not to hearken unto the voice of Jehovah your God,
After Jerusalem fell, a small group remained in the land. They asked Jeremiah to seek God's direction, and God told them to stay. Verse 13 turns to the other answer they might give: no. Refusing to stay was itself disobedience to the voice of the LORD.
God's reply came in two halves. Verses 9–12 promised building, planting and mercy if they stayed. Verse 13 begins the alternative:
Earlier God urged them to submit to the king of Babylon. Now He warns them, just as firmly, against fleeing to Egypt for protection. Faith accepts the chastening of sin, yet still trusts God and His grace. Unbelief is full of resources. But they are all merely the workings of a rebellious heart. They secure nothing but ruin for everyone they carry away. If they believed, low as their condition was, they need not hurry, and they would surely be established. They would be in the hand of the One who could turn Nebuchadnezzar's heart toward them. Why should they be terrified by their enemies?
The "if you say" of this verse was not a real open question. They had made up their minds before Jeremiah prayed:
One thing spoilt these fine words. The later history shows that underneath them self-will was at work. They had already decided to take their own course. The self-will of the flesh shows itself in their over-confident promise that they were ready to obey the voice of the Lord. Are there not those who say, like this remnant, "Give us Scripture — give us the word of the Lord — and we will bow to it"? We may well fear that self-will lies behind such fine words.
Another writer turns it into a warning for us:
Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
Staying in the land was the one condition attached to everything God had promised:
The Lord's way is very plain. Does this little remnant want to be built up and established? Do they want to enjoy the Lord's presence with them and the Lord's mercies? Then there is one condition they must meet. They must "remain in this land." However great the failure, however complete the ruin, there would still be blessing for a little remnant — a few out of many — so long as they stayed on God's ground for God's people. Their king and leaders may have fled. The house of the Lord may be burned to the ground, and the walls of Jerusalem broken down. Yet there would still be blessing for those who remained in the land.
Their disobedience had a motive. It was fear, not open defiance:
But how soon evil developed in this remnant! They could have feared the Lord and thought on His name. They could have submitted to the rule of Nebuchadnezzar, the rod in the Lord's hand to punish Judah for her sins. They could have remembered that they were part of the guilty nation, caught up with everyone else in the common ruin. Then all might have been well… Instead, driven by the fear of man, some sought refuge in Egypt — that world out of which God had brought them by His sovereign favour and mighty power. "In the fear of the LORD one has strong confidence" — but "the fear of man lays a snare."
One writer sets Egypt against Babylon: "To go back to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance" (H. J. Vine).
Their plan achieved the opposite of what they wanted:
So God in the long run always accomplishes His will. Happy are those who are in its current the whole way through! If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment. Temporary success only makes that bitterness worse. Far from hindering the word of the Lord, they fulfil it by the very measures they take to get their own wishes. And they bring the evils they most dread on themselves without fail.
The pull described in this verse is not confined to that generation:
Are we not at times tempted to grow weary of God's path? Are we not tempted to look for an easier path in some man-made system? In such a system we bring in worldly principles and methods, and so escape the constant call for the exercise of faith.
- Stay. One condition carried every promise God made: remain in the land. Blessing for the few depended on nothing else.
- Ask honestly. They asked for guidance after they had already decided. Going to God with your mind made up is an affront to Him.
- Fear drives it. The fear of man, not open rebellion, is what made Egypt look safe to people God had once brought out of Egypt.
- Faith bows. Faith takes God's discipline and still trusts Him. Unbelief invents escapes, and every one of them ends in ruin.
- The escape traps you. What they fled from is what found them. The plan meant to dodge the evil is the plan that brings it.
saying, No; but we will go into the land of Egypt, where we shall see no war, nor hear the sound of the trumpet, nor have hunger for bread; and there will we dwell;
After Jerusalem fell, the few people left in the land asked Jeremiah to seek God's direction. Here they name the place they had already chosen. Their answer opens with a flat No. Egypt, they say, means no war, no trumpet call to arms, no hunger — and they mean to settle there. So where is safety: in the place that looks safest, or in the God whose word they had just sworn to obey?
They had vowed to obey whatever answer came, good or bad. But this verse shows they had already made up their minds.
They ask Jeremiah for guidance, but they refuse to obey the word of the Lord that he speaks. They run to Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar, only to fall by the sword. That sword would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there under the king's rule.
When the answer cut across their will, what was underneath came out.
Here the real state of things comes out clearly. Pride and self-will were at work. Their vows and promises were false. You were not honest in your hearts, says Jeremiah, when you sent me to the Lord your God with the words: Pray for us to the Lord our God, and tell us all that He says, and we will do it. God's answer would have suited them well enough, had it agreed with what they wanted. But it went against them, so they rejected it completely.
Their promise to obey was loud. That was the giveaway.
But how painful it is to find that the flesh gives itself away by an excessive show of piety just as much as by open godlessness! A trained eye does not spot the emptiness in a lack of zeal. It spots it in a readiness to obey God's will — whatever that will may be — that is too lavish, or at least too sure of itself. The duty may be plain. But what about the heart? What about the strength to keep going and to see it through? Faith feels our own weakness just as surely as it counts on God and His grace.
By human reckoning Egypt was the obvious choice. That is exactly what it stands for.
For Israel it was going down into Egypt. For us it is taking advice in any difficulty from natural wisdom instead of from God. Israel looked for that same wisdom of the flesh, and Egypt is its symbol in the ancient world. In the early history of the world no country was so famous for natural wisdom as Egypt... Egypt leaned on good advice, as if there were no living God — on human advice sharpened by long experience.
Another group from Judah was already living in Babylon. The two destinations did not end the same way.
These people go down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and disease will destroy them. Those at Babylon receive a promise, for the time being, of peace, prosperity and plenty... At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt therefore was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
They went to Egypt to escape war, alarm and hunger. Those three would meet them there instead. The pattern runs wider than one chapter.
If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment, and a brief success only makes it more bitter. Far from holding back the word of the Lord, the very steps they take to get their own way carry it out. And they bring the evils they dread most on themselves, without fail.
Staying in a ruined land under a foreign king looked like the bigger risk. It was the safer road.
If they stayed, this would be their salvation. Blessing always goes with accepting God's judgment, when the soul bows to Him and, despite everything, still counts on Him to bless. Going down to Egypt, where they expected to find safety, meant walking on into certain judgment.
They were giving up more than a place.
God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name. If they desert Him for another, woe to them! It can only end in shame, sorrow and ruin. Even when they have rebelled as far as rebellion goes, He still sends them a message, in case any might yet hear it and escape.
- Decided — They asked God for direction with their answer already chosen. A loud vow can still be a false one.
- Down — Egypt stands for human wisdom acting as if there were no living God. It attracts us because it looks sensible.
- Deserted — This was more than a change of address. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name, and to leave Him for another can only end in shame and ruin.
- Delivered to fear — Egypt held the very war, trumpet and hunger they ran from. Resisting God's word brings on us the evils we dread most.
- Different road — Accepting God's discipline would have saved them. From Babylon there was deliverance; from Egypt there was none.
-- and now, therefore, hear the word of Jehovah, ye remnant of Judah thus saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel If ye really set your faces to enter into Egypt, and go to sojourn there,
Jerusalem has fallen, and the few people left in the land fear Babylon's revenge. They ask Jeremiah for God's guidance and promise to obey it. God's answer is a promise for staying and a warning for leaving — and this verse opens the warning half.
Before the "but if," God had told them to stay in the land. He promised to build them, to plant them, and to turn the king of Babylon's heart toward them. One commentator puts the two commands side by side, then weighs faith against unbelief:
God now warns them not to flee to Egypt for protection, with the same force as when He earlier told them to submit to the king of Babylon. Faith accepts the discipline that sin brings, and still trusts God and His grace. Unbelief is full of resources. They are only the workings of a rebellious heart, and they secure nothing but ruin for those they carry away.
The phrase "set your faces" describes a decision already taken, not a question still open. They had asked for direction ten days earlier, but the answer they wanted was already settled in their hearts. One commentator states the principle plainly:
But it will never do to go and ask counsel of God in a matter about which our mind is made up, or our will is at work.
That hidden intention did not escape God, and it shaped the form of His reply:
In their hearts they had a desire to go to Egypt. He who searches hearts knew all about it. They used deceit. The Lord knew they would not obey, so He announced through the prophet that they would die by the sword, the famine and the disease.
They chose Egypt because it looked like the one place the sword could not reach. The warning turns that logic inside out: the sword they were running from was waiting at the destination.
In the end God always accomplishes His will. Happy are those who go with it the whole way! If people resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment. Passing success only makes it more bitter. They do not hinder the word of the Lord. The very steps they take to get their own way carry it out, and the evils they dread most they bring on themselves without fail.
The distance they put between themselves and Babylon proved to be no distance at all:
If they had stayed quietly in the land, under the authority of the Chaldean king whom God had placed over them, they would have been safe. But they chose human policy and thought it safer to go down into Egypt, when in fact it proved the opposite. Nebuchadnezzar pursued the Egyptians and punished these unbelieving Jews in that land.
The same nation went in two directions at the same time, and the outcomes could not have been more different. Egypt was the country God once brought Israel out of; Babylon was where He sent them for discipline.
These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and disease will consume them. Those at Babylon have a promise of peace and prosperity and plenty for the time being. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, even though he pronounces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon, where Daniel prevails in prayer with God for their deliverance and restoration. At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. So to return to Egypt was fatal, while from Babylon there was deliverance.
Underneath the geography lies one question: who would they trust for safety? Their move to Egypt was no passing whim but a settled purpose, and it meant leaving one protector for another.
Going into Egypt was a fatal step. The prophet had given them the word of the Lord. It told them they would be safe in the land under Nebuchadnezzar, and destroyed in Egypt. Yet Egypt was where their impulse — indeed their determination — was set on going for shelter, as a prudent move. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they abandon Him for another, it goes badly for them.
- Set faces — The verse speaks to people who had already decided. Asking God for counsel with a made-up mind will never do.
- Searched hearts — God saw the desire they hid behind their polite question, and answered what they really intended.
- Chosen policy — Human calculation looked safer than staying under the king God had placed over them. It proved to be the opposite.
- Dreaded evil — The steps they took to escape the sword carried them into it. Nebuchadnezzar followed them into Egypt.
- Deserted Saviour — Babylon held a promise of deliverance; Egypt held none. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name.
then it shall come to pass, that the sword which ye fear shall overtake you there in the land of Egypt, and the famine, whereof ye are afraid, shall follow hard after you there in Egypt; and there ye shall die.
Jerusalem had fallen, and the few Jews left in the land dreaded what Babylon would do after their governor's murder. They asked Jeremiah for God's direction, and God told them that the escape they had chosen was the deadliest road open to them.
Jeremiah's words are not a general threat. They answer a plan the people had already made:
Suppose the remnant say, "We will not stay in the land. We fear that staying will mean conflict, constant warnings by the sound of the trumpet, and perhaps even a lack of bread. So we plan to leave the land and find escape from these things in another land." If they speak and act like this, God warns them that the very things they seek to escape will overtake them. Most solemn of all, they will not have the Lord with them in blessing. Instead they will have the hand of the Lord upon them in government.
Egypt was not chosen in calm. The plan grew out of the breakdown described in the previous chapter:
But false ones got in among them. In Jeremiah 41 the flesh runs wild. Conflict and confusion reign. Many fall. The power of evil takes some into bondage. Others, moved by the fear of man, seek refuge in Egypt — the very world God had delivered them from by His sovereign favour and mighty power.
The warning fits a wider pattern. Resistance to God does not cancel His word; it carries it out:
So God in the long run always accomplishes His will. Happy are those who go with its current the whole way! If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment. Temporary success only makes that bitterness sharper. Far from hindering the word of the Lord, they carry it out by the very measures meant to serve their own wishes. The evils they dread most they bring on themselves without fail.
What followed showed which land was truly dangerous:
They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. Yet they only fall under the sword. That sword would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there in submission to the king. In Egypt they give themselves up to idolatry, so that the wrath of God comes upon them to the very end.
Of the two foreign lands, one carried a promise and the other did not:
The story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to that of the remnant in Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and plague consume them. Those in Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being... God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity when they turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt, therefore, was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
Their request for prayer had a flaw in it from the start:
They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that they might have divine guidance about their path. But they had already made up their minds to go with their whole company to Egypt (Jer. 42). Let us beware of coming to God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
The same writer draws out two lessons for anyone tempted to dodge a hard path:
First, taking a false step to escape trouble is the surest way to fall into the trouble we are trying to escape. If we leave God's ground to escape the difficulties of the path of faith, the world will entangle us. The path of self-will will overwhelm us with its own difficulties. Second, God warns the remnant that those who take such a path will fall into reproach and "see this place no more" (v. 18)... When God in His government says "no more," there is an end of the matter.
- Fear chose. The plan came from those moved by the fear of man, not from any direction given by God.
- Fear asked late. They asked for prayer with the decision already made — an affront to God, not a real question.
- Fear caught them. The sword and famine they ran from met them in Egypt, while the land they abandoned would have spared them.
- Fear misread the map. Babylon held out deliverance. Egypt, the land God had once redeemed them from, was fatal.
- Fear's rule. A false step taken to escape trouble is the surest way into the very trouble you fear, and the way back may close for good.
And it shall be that all the men that have set their faces to go into Egypt to sojourn there shall die by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence; and none of them shall remain or escape from the evil that I will bring upon them.
Jerusalem had fallen. A small group stayed in the land under Babylon's rule, and in fear they asked Jeremiah to pray for guidance. The answer: going to Egypt would mean death by sword, famine and pestilence. The verse raises a hard question: why would the place they chose for safety become the place of their ruin?
"Set their faces" points to a decision they had already made. They asked for prayer to cover it, and God saw through them.
In their hearts they had a desire to go to Egypt. He who is the searcher of hearts knew all about it. They used deceit. The Lord knew that they would not obey, and now He announced through the prophet that they should die by the sword, the famine and the pestilence.
One writer notices even the pronoun they chose when they asked Jeremiah to pray.
The people went to the prophet to ask for guidance about going down into Egypt. But they had already made up their minds. They were bent on their own will. Miserable condition! Had they been meek and humble, they would not have needed to ask for guidance at all. But they said to Jeremiah the prophet, "Let our plea be accepted before you, and pray for us to the Lord your God." Why not say, The Lord our God?
The answer came from God, not from Jeremiah's own judgment. It lined up with what He had already told them about Babylon.
The prophet himself waits until the divine answer comes: it was no question of his wisdom, but of God's word. And God now warns against fleeing into Egypt for protection. The warning is as firm as His earlier call to submit to the king of Babylon. Faith accepts the chastening of sin, yet still trusts in God and His grace. Unbelief is full of resources. They are all the workings of a rebellious heart, and they bring nothing but ruin on those who let it carry them away.
Egypt looked like a prudent shelter. The step became fatal once the Lord had spoken.
The path of unbelief is a rapid descent when the heart hardens itself against a direct warning of the Lord. The greater the earlier claim to godliness, the deeper the fall... But it was a fatal step. The prophet gave them the word of Jehovah. That word assured them of safety in the land under Nebuchadnezzar, and of destruction in Egypt. Yet their impulse — indeed their determination — was to go to Egypt for shelter as the prudent move. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they desert Him for another, woe to them!
Sword, famine and pestilence were the very evils they were running from.
So God in the long run always accomplishes His will. Happy are those who are in its current all the way through! If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment, and a short run of success only makes it more bitter. Far from hindering the word of Jehovah, they carry it out by the very measures meant to serve their own wishes. The evils they dread most they bring on themselves without fail.
The verse leaves no survivors. This group stands in contrast to those already carried off to Babylon.
The story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to that of the remnant in Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and pestilence consume them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, though he pronounces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon... At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
Going back to Egypt for help insulted the God who had brought them out of it.
Leaning on Egypt like this offended God in a special way. At the start of their history as a nation, He had delivered them from that very people by His judgments. God has delivered the Christian from the world-system and from the judgment coming on it. Suppose he goes back to it. Suppose he leans on its power or its wisdom instead of finding his resource in God when emergencies arise. That offends God just as much.
- Set — "set their faces" names a decision made before the prayer. The One who searches hearts saw the deceit behind the plea for guidance.
- Answered — the reply was God's word, not the prophet's advice. He warned against Egypt as firmly as He had urged submission to Babylon.
- Deserted — God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name. Once His word had come, the flight to Egypt for shelter was a fatal step.
- Returned — resistance never hinders God's word. The measures they chose to serve their own wishes carried it out, and the evils they dreaded came on them.
- Ended — from Babylon came deliverance; from Egypt, no remnant and no survivor. The same pull back to the world still works today.
For thus saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel As mine anger and my fury have been poured forth upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, so shall my fury be poured forth upon you, when ye shall enter into Egypt; and ye shall be an execration, and an astonishment, and a curse, and a reproach, and ye shall see this place no more.
The remnant left in Judah had asked Jeremiah for God's direction: should they stay in the land, or go to Egypt? This verse is God's answer to the second option — the same wrath that had just levelled Jerusalem, poured out on them there, and a door shut on any return.
They were leaving because they feared war and hunger in a ruined land. The warning is that the flight itself brings on the very things they dread.
Suppose the remnant say, "We will not stay in the land. We fear that if we do, it will mean conflict, and constant warnings by the sound of the trumpet, and perhaps even lack of bread. So we propose to leave the land and escape these things in another land." If they speak and act this way, the Lord warns them that the very things they seek to escape will overtake them. Most solemn of all, instead of having the Lord with them in blessing, they will have the hand of the Lord upon them in government.
Resistance does not block God's will. It ends up serving it.
So God in the long run always accomplishes His will. Happy are those who are in its current all the way through! If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment, which temporary success only makes more bitter. Far from hindering the word of the Lord, they carry it out by the very measures meant to serve their own wishes. And the evils they most dread they bring on themselves without fail.
The last clause is the heaviest. Alongside becoming a byword, they lose the land itself — and one writer reads that closing "no more" as God's settled government, with a sober application to anyone who abandons a path once walked in the light.
The Lord also warns the remnant that those who take such a path will fall into reproach, and "see this place no more" (v. 18). Think how solemn this is. Some have walked for a time in the light of the truth for God's Assembly. They then gave it up for an easier path in some man-made system. Such people have seldom, if ever, been recovered. They "see this place no more." When God in His government says "no more," there is an end of the matter.
Why should Egypt be worse than Babylon, the power that had just destroyed their city? Because each place had entered Israel's story in a different way.
This short history has a special interest, for the story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to that of the remnant at Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and disease will consume them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt, but Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
This threat stands beside a promise. Staying under the king they feared was the path of faith. The alternative was unbelief, busy inventing safer plans.
Faith accepts God's discipline for sin, yet still trusts God and His grace. Unbelief is full of ideas. But they are only the workings of a rebellious heart, and they bring nothing but ruin to those who follow them. If they believed, they need not rush, low as their condition was. God would surely establish them, for they would be in the hand of the One who could turn the heart of Nebuchadnezzar toward them.
The warning changed nothing. What lay behind the refusal?
The self-will that was determined to take a certain course deceived them. Nothing will so warp the understanding, and hinder the grasp of the truth, as self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see. And, as always, behind the self-will there was pride that would not admit they were wrong.
One writer turns this into a rule for prayer.
Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
- Ground — The blessing promised to this small remnant hung on one condition: stay in the land.
- Escape — They left because they feared sword and hunger. Flight delivers the very evils it runs from.
- Wrath — Egypt was no shelter. The anger that fell on Jerusalem would follow them there.
- No return — The judgment was final. They become a reproach and never see the land again, and when God says "no more," the matter is closed.
- Will — They heard the word clearly and refused it. Self-will will not see what it does not want to see. So never bring God a decision already made.
Jehovah hath said concerning you, the remnant of Judah, Go ye not into Egypt. Know certainly that I have admonished you this day.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
For ye deceived yourselves in your own souls, when ye sent me unto Jehovah your God, saying, Pray for us unto Jehovah our God; and according to all that Jehovah our God shall say, so declare unto us, and we will do it.
The captains and the people swore to obey whatever answer God gave them. Jeremiah brought it — stay in the land — and this verse is his verdict on the men who asked.
The charge is not simply that they lied to Jeremiah. One writer notes that the phrase reaches inward, and traces the deception back to a will that had already chosen.
He says, "You deceived yourselves in your hearts," or, by a better translation, "You deceived yourselves in your own souls" (v. 20). Self-will had fixed on a certain course, and that self-will deceived them. Nothing warps the understanding and blocks the grasp of truth like self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see. And, as always, behind the self-will there was pride that would not admit they were wrong.
Jeremiah quotes their own vow back to them. Their fervour, far from proving sincerity, was the very thing that gave them away.
How painful it is to find that the flesh betrays itself just as much by an excessive show of piety as by godlessness! An experienced eye does not spot the flesh's hollowness in a lack of eagerness. It spots it in a readiness to obey God's will — whatever that will may be — that is too lavish, or at least too self-confident.
Their promise sounded right, and people still make it in other words.
One thing spoilt these fair words. The later history shows that underneath their good words self-will was at work. They had already decided to take their own course... Are there not those who say, like this remnant, "Give us Scripture — give us the word of the Lord — and we will bow to it"? We may well fear that self-will lies behind such fair words.
They wanted Jeremiah to pray, but the destination was settled before they opened their mouths. One writer compares this to Balaam and draws a warning from it.
They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that they might have God's guidance about their path. Yet they had already made up their minds to go to Egypt with their whole company (Jer. 42). Let us beware of going before God at any time with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
Guidance depends on the state of heart that asks.
If only we are humble and distrust ourselves, He will surely guide us. That means waiting on our God with a simple heart, an upright mind, and honest purpose. But it will never do to ask God's counsel about a matter we have already decided, or where our own will is at work.
The answer they had sworn to obey was an offer of protection in the very place they feared. Behind their scheming lay a refusal to trust.
Earlier God urged them to submit to the king of Babylon. Now He warns them, just as strongly, against fleeing to Egypt for protection. Faith accepts the chastening of sin, yet still trusts God and His grace. Unbelief is full of plans, and every one of them is only the working of a rebellious heart. They secure nothing but ruin for everyone they carry away.
Egypt was chosen to escape sword and famine. That is exactly what they met there.
If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment. A short-lived success only makes it more bitter. They do not hinder the word of the LORD at all. The very steps they take to get their own way carry it out, and the evils they dread most, they bring on themselves without fail.
The rule fits in one line:
To take a false step to escape trouble is the surest way to fall into the trouble we are trying to escape.
- Will first. This failure starts with a will already decided. Self-will warps the understanding, so it cannot see what it does not want to see.
- Will disguised. A decided will does not look rebellious at first. It sounds devout. Loud promises of obedience were the disguise Jeremiah saw through.
- Will praying. Asking God to guide a matter already settled is an affront, not prayer. God guides the humble, who distrust themselves.
- Will refusing. God's answer pointed them away from Egypt. Faith accepts correction and still trusts Him; unbelief makes its own plans instead.
- Will punished. A false step to escape trouble brings the trouble. The evil they dreaded most, they brought on themselves.
And I have this day declared [it] to you; but ye have not obeyed the voice of Jehovah your God, nor anything for which he hath sent me unto you.
After Jerusalem fell, the survivors asked Jeremiah to pray and find out where God wanted them to go. They promised to obey any answer, so why does the prophet now say they have already refused it?
The word Jeremiah declared to them was not his own advice. He kept his opinion to himself and waited for God to speak.
Jeremiah turns to the Lord, receiving an answer after ten days. During these days he apparently has no communication with the people. He will not venture an opinion of his own about the way in which they should walk and act. He will wait for clear directions from the Lord.
The request looked humble, but they had settled the matter before they asked. Even their wording gave them away: they called God your God when speaking to the prophet.
The people applied to the prophet to ask counsel about going down into Egypt. But they had already made up their minds about their course. They were bent on their own will. What a miserable condition! Had they been meek and humble, they would not have needed to ask counsel in the matter. But they said to Jeremiah the prophet, "Let our plea for mercy come before you, and pray to the LORD your God for us" — why not say, our God?
Their promise to obey could not have sounded stronger. That eagerness, not any coldness, should have raised suspicion.
How painful it is to find that the flesh gives itself away by an excessive show of piety just as much as by godlessness! An experienced eye does not detect that hollowness in a lack of eagerness. It detects it in a readiness to obey God's will, whatever it may be — a readiness that is too generous, or at least too self-confident.
Verse 20 explains verse 21. They had not only misled Jeremiah. They had misled themselves. (The wording below comes from an older translation.)
Jeremiah is not ignorant of the reason. He says, "You dissembled in your hearts." A better translation is, "You deceived yourselves in your own souls." Their self-will was set on a certain course, and it deceived them. Nothing will warp the understanding and block the grasp of truth like self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see.
Another writer brings this into daily life. Once our minds are set, we dress up our own will as a search for God's leading.
In these things we are all too likely to deceive ourselves. To keep our self-respect, we will try to persuade ourselves that our motives are better than they are. Or we will hide our real intentions and desires under a plausible cover: we say we want the Lord's leading!
Their ruined condition felt like a reason to act fast. Faith would have read it the other way.
Faith accepts the chastening of sin, yet still trusts God and His grace. Unbelief is full of resources. They are all merely the workings of a rebellious heart, and they secure nothing but ruin for those they carry away. If they believed, low as their condition was, they need not rush, and would surely be established.
Egypt was not simply one option among several. The group carried off to Babylon had a future; these had chosen the country God had once brought Israel out of.
This group goes down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and disease will destroy them. Those at Babylon have a promise of peace and prosperity and plenty for the time being… At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity later, when they had turned away from the Lord. To go back to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
They fled to avoid sword, famine and disease. Those three things met them where they went.
To take a false step to escape trouble is the surest way to fall into the trouble we are trying to escape.
- Asked. They came for guidance with their minds already made up. That is a miserable condition, not an act of trust.
- Answered. Jeremiah waited ten days and offered no opinion of his own. The word they received was God's, not the prophet's.
- Declared. Jeremiah told them the whole answer. After that they could not plead ignorance.
- Refused. They did not simply change their minds. They deceived themselves, because self-will will not see what it does not want to see. Their loud promise was the first clue.
- Reaped. The sword and famine they fled from met them in Egypt. A false step taken to escape trouble is the surest road into it.
And now know certainly that ye shall die by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence, in the place whither ye desire to go to sojourn.
God's answer came after ten days: stay in the land, do not run to Egypt. This closing verse is not advice but a verdict — they had sworn to obey, yet God says they will die in the very place they are set on going.
Before the answer arrived, these people had pledged to obey whatever God said. Commentators read that pledge as the very thing that gave them away.
How painful it is to find that the flesh gives itself away by an excessive show of piety quite as much as by open godlessness! The experienced eye does not spot this hollowness by a lack of fervour. It spots a readiness to obey the divine will, whatever it may be, that is too eager, or at least too self-confident. The duty may be plain; but what of the heart? What of the power to go on and to go through? Faith assumes a sense of our own weakness just as surely as it counts on God and His grace. Human resolution in divine things has force only when it gets its own way.
They had sent Jeremiah to pray for them, yet their minds were already fixed on Egypt.
It is nothing but solemn mockery to ask for guidance when we have already made up our minds; and yet how often we do it! How often do we settle on a course of action, and then go and ask the Lord about it! All this is wretched; it is honouring God with the lips while the heart is in outright rebellion against Him.
The people may not even have known they were pretending. God's word uncovered a motive they had hidden from themselves.
In these things we are all too likely to deceive ourselves. To keep our self-respect, we try to persuade ourselves that our motives are better than they are. Or we hide our real intentions and desires under the plausible cover of saying we want the Lord's leading! But let us honestly read the Word of God, and it will expose these secret workings and make the purposes of the heart plain… It can be a serious snare to assume that our preferences agree with the Word of God. Then, when the Word comes to us saying the opposite, we object that it must be a wrong translation or a wrong interpretation, and dismiss it without honest inquiry.
Sword, famine and plague were what they feared in Judah. The verse names them again — in Egypt. Commentators see a fixed principle at work here, not just one nation's misfortune.
So God always accomplishes His will in the end. Happy are those who move with its current the whole way through! If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment. Passing success only makes it more bitter. Far from hindering the word of the Lord, they fulfil it by the very measures meant to carry out their own wishes. The evils they dread most they bring on themselves without fail.
Other survivors from Judah had gone as captives to Babylon. Commentators set the two groups side by side.
These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and plague destroy them there. Those at Babylon receive a promise, for the time being, of peace, prosperity and plenty. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, though he pronounces their doom. The others have the prophets Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon, where Daniel prevails in prayer with God for their deliverance and restoration. God had redeemed the people out of Egypt at the beginning. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. To go back to Egypt, then, was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
Their reasoning was simple: leave the ruined land, and the trouble ends. Commentators say the same reasoning still fails today.
If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We grow tired of strife and division and weakness, but going into the world does not mend matters.
- Ask honestly. Asking God for direction when the mind is already made up is not prayer. It is honouring Him with the lips.
- Watch the eager vow. An eager promise to obey can reveal self-confidence, not faith. Real faith counts on God and knows its own weakness.
- Let the Word search you. We hide our real intentions behind the words "I want the Lord's leading." Honest reading of the Word uncovers them.
- Expect the dread to follow. The steps men take to escape what they fear hand them over to it. God's will is done either way.
- Egypt mends nothing. Running into the world does not end the trouble. From Babylon there was deliverance; Egypt was fatal.
And it came to pass, when Jeremiah had ended speaking unto all the people all the words of Jehovah their God, with which Jehovah their God had sent him to them -- all these words,
In chapter 42 the people asked Jeremiah for God's guidance and promised to obey whatever He said. Chapter 43 opens the moment Jeremiah finishes delivering God's answer — and what follows shows that asking God for direction and wanting it are two different things.
Their promise had sounded good. Now the message has ended, and God's answer cuts across the plan they had already chosen.
Unbelief may go on quietly for a while. It may even make pious professions. But a time of testing always comes. It tests whether we are really seeking God's will or our own. Johanan the son of Kareah had only just opposed Ishmael, the crafty assassin and royal plunderer. Yet he is one of the proud men who insult the prophet and reject the message God sent through him.
They had gone to Jeremiah for guidance while their route was already fixed. Fear of the Chaldeans lay behind it.
The Jewish captains in the days of Jeremiah were afraid of the Chaldeans. They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that they might have God's guidance about their path. But they had already made up their minds to go down to Egypt with their whole company (Jer. 42). Let us beware of ever going before God with our minds already made up. It is a serious insult to the Divine Majesty!
They called the prophet a liar. The problem was not the message but the listeners.
The self-will that was determined to take a certain course deceived them. Nothing warps the understanding and blocks the grasp of truth like self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see. And, as always, pride stood behind that self-will — pride that would not admit they were wrong. So, as we read, "all the proud men" came to Jeremiah saying, "You are telling a lie. The LORD our God did not send you to say, 'Do not go to Egypt to live there.'"
Unbelief did not stop at doubting the prophet. It went on to invent a motive for him.
His own evil heart of unbelief not only mistrusted the prophet, but let itself run wild in imagining a plot between Baruch and the prophet to hand the rest of them over to the Chaldean conquerors. The unbeliever's readiness to believe anything is well known, and an evil, self-willed action follows quickly.
Everything about their circumstances should have crushed any sense of self-importance. Yet pride is the very thing the text points out in their leaders.
There is something contemptible about these leaders of the survivors. The Holy Spirit draws attention to the "proud men"! After what had happened, pride is the last thing you would expect. They had been so humiliated, and their situation at that moment was enough to humble them. Even so, some among them still prided themselves on being God's people.
They did not leave Jeremiah behind. They forced him and Baruch to go down to Egypt with them.
Stubborn in their purpose to the end, they revolt against God. They take Jeremiah and faithful Baruch with them, because they do not want to leave behind these witnesses to their disobedience and unbelief. They forget only one thing: they are carrying with them the Word that condemns them. To the end Jeremiah keeps faithfully using the gift of prophecy God had entrusted to him. At Tahpanhes, just as at Jerusalem, he is a witness to the true God.
Force wins the day. They drag Jeremiah to the very country God had told them to stay out of — and no guilt touches him for being there.
Those who believe can afford to be calm and submit. If the hand of power forces them to go here or there, the responsibility is no longer theirs. The guilt belongs to those who despise the word of the Lord. Until Jesus returns in glory, the faithful have to swim against the current — above all those entrusted with the testimony. They must suffer where violence overpowers them.
- Finished. When Jeremiah delivers the last of God's words, the pretence ends. A time of testing always comes, and it shows whether we wanted God's will or our own.
- Fixed. They had already decided on Egypt before they asked. Going to God with the mind made up is an insult to Him, not an act of devotion.
- Blind. Self-will warps the understanding. It refuses to see what it does not want to see — so a true message gets called a lie.
- Proud. Hard circumstances do not create humility. These men had lost everything and still thought they were somebody.
- Carried. They took the prophet along to silence him. Instead they carried with them the very Word that condemned them, while the faithful man stayed calm and kept witnessing in Egypt.
-- then spoke Azariah the son of Hoshaiah, and Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the proud men, saying to Jeremiah, Thou speakest falsely Jehovah our God hath not sent thee to say, Go not into Egypt to sojourn there;
Survivors in Judah had sworn to obey whatever answer God gave, and He sent word through Jeremiah that they should stay in the land (Jeremiah 42). Here they answer Him by calling the prophet a liar — which raises a hard question about what we really want when we ask God for direction.
They had fixed their course before they ever sent for the prophet.
Here, the real state of the case comes clearly out. Pride and self-will were at work. Their vows and promises were false. "You were not honest in your hearts," says Jeremiah, "when you sent me to the Lord your God, saying, Pray for us to the Lord our God; and whatever the Lord our God says, tell us, and we will do it." It would have been fine if God's answer had matched their will. But it ran the other way, so they rejected it altogether.
Kelly notes that such a collapse is not sudden. Trial does not create unbelief. It brings it into the open.
Unbelief may go on quietly for a while, and even put forth pious professions; but a time of trial inevitably comes, and tests whether it is God's will, or our own, that we are really seeking. Johanan, the son of Kareah, is one of the proud men who insult the prophet and reject the message God sent by him. If his spirit had been lowly and broken, he would have trembled and been able to hear the voice of the Lord. But he was not of God, and a will he had never judged blinded his eyes and dulled his ears.
They did not say Jeremiah had misheard. They said he was lying. Rossier sees the same thing wherever God's word crosses what a person has already chosen.
In their pride the leaders do not want to accept humiliation, and they treat the word of God as a lie. Is it not always like this when God brings His word to people who have chosen the world and their own self-will? That word condemns the world and the will of man. In the face of the clearest verdict they say: "You are telling a lie. The LORD our God did not send you to say" this (Jer. 43:2). So they do not listen to the word of the Lord.
Rather than answer the message, they attacked the man behind it, claiming Jeremiah was passing on his secretary's opinions as God's.
Moreover they tell Jeremiah that he is not governed by the word of the Lord; he is simply repeating man's word. In effect they say: We asked you for the word of the Lord, and you have only told us what Baruch says. If we follow you, it will only bring us all into bondage (Jer. 43:1-3).
Kelly asks what could justify such a doubt.
Perhaps Johanan honestly thought what he said. But if so, how did he come to think it? What had Jeremiah ever done to support, or even excuse, a doubt that his message came from the Lord? His own evil heart of unbelief did more than mistrust the prophet: it ran loose, imagining a plot between Baruch and the prophet to hand the rest of them over to the conquering Babylonians. The unbeliever's readiness to believe anything is well known, and an evil, self-willed act soon follows.
The label is striking given what these men had just lived through — the city destroyed, the people scattered, the governor murdered.
Azariah, Johanan, and all the proud men accuse the prophet of speaking falsely, saying that Baruch was setting him on against them. There is something contemptible about these leaders of the remnant. The Holy Spirit calls attention to the "proud men"! After what had happened, you would hardly expect pride. They had been so humiliated, and their position at that moment should have humbled them deeply! Yet some among them still took pride in being the people of God.
Willis adds what such pride costs.
"All the proud men" of Jeremiah 43:2 are examples of those who had no perception at all, for pride and perception cannot exist together. "He leads the humble in what is right, and teaches the humble His way." (Ps. 25:9).
They went to Egypt to escape danger and found it there instead.
First, taking a false step to escape trouble is the surest way to fall into the trouble we are trying to escape... Second, the remnant are warned that those who take such a path will fall into reproach, and "see this place no more" (Jer. 42:18)... When God in His government says "no more," there is an end of the matter.
Jeremiah himself was dragged along by force. Kelly draws out what that means for anyone carried where they did not choose to go.
Those who believe can afford to be calm and submit. If the hand of power forces them to go here or there, it is no longer their responsibility, but the guilt of those who despise the word of the Lord.
- Pride first. They are called "the proud men" at the very moment their losses should have humbled them. Pride and perception cannot exist together.
- Then self-will. Their minds were made up before they asked. The vow to obey was only a hope that God would agree with them.
- Then the accusation. The answer crossed their will, so they called it a lie and blamed Baruch for the words.
- Then the flight. Leaving God's word to escape trouble is the surest way to land in the trouble you fear.
- Then "no more." God told them they would see that place no more. When His government says "no more," the matter is closed.
but Baruch the son of Nerijah is setting thee on against us, to deliver us into the hand of the Chaldeans, that they may put us to death, and carry us away captives into Babylon.
These men asked Jeremiah for the Lord's answer, and now they reject it and pin the message on a man, Baruch. That raises a sharp question: what happens when someone asks God for direction with his mind already made up?
These leaders had consulted the prophet themselves. Their refusal here is not a sudden change of mind. It exposes what was already there.
Unbelief may go on quietly for a while, and can even make pious professions. But a time of testing always comes, and it shows whether it is God's will or our own that we are really seeking... Johanan, one of those who came to Jeremiah, is among the proud men who insult the prophet and reject the message God sent through him. Had there been a lowly and repentant spirit, he would have trembled, and would have been able to hear the voice of the Lord. But he was not of God, and an unjudged will blinded his eyes and dulled his ears. His own evil, unbelieving heart not only mistrusted the prophet, but let itself run on and imagine a plot between Baruch and the prophet to hand the rest of the people over to the Chaldean conquerors. Unbelievers will believe anything, as is well known, and an evil, self-willed action quickly follows.
One commentator traces the link between what these men wanted and what they could see.
The self-will that was determined to take a certain course deceived them. Nothing will so warp the understanding, and so block the grasp of truth, as self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see. And, as always, behind the self-will there was pride that would not admit they were wrong.
Who was this Baruch?
Son of Neriah, and faithful secretary to Jeremiah. Later he was carried into Egypt with Jeremiah.
They did not deny the word of the Lord. They said Jeremiah was not the one carrying it.
They also tell Jeremiah that the word of the Lord does not govern him. He is only repeating a man's word. In effect they say: We asked you for the word of the Lord. You have told us what Baruch says. If we follow you, it will only bring us all into bondage.
Their charge names what they feared: the Chaldeans — the Babylonians — killing them or carrying them off. One thing could have kept them safe, and it was not flight.
Still, if at this last hour the few who were left had bowed to Nebuchadnezzar's rule, peace would have reigned in the land, and they would have kept it... They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth. They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. There they fall under the sword. That sword would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there under the king.
Of the two destinations open to them, only one had a road back.
These people go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord. There sword, famine and disease will destroy them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being... God first redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
They took Jeremiah and Baruch with them into Egypt.
The proud men had no idea what they were doing. They were carrying along with them the very man whose voice would soon speak in Egypt to pronounce their doom. And it would come by the hand of the conqueror they hoped to shut out behind an unbreakable barrier, raised in the power of the king of the south. What a vain hope, to escape the hand of the God they despised!
The warning here is about how we seek guidance.
Suppose we are humble and do not trust ourselves. Suppose we wait on our God with a simple heart, an upright mind, and honest purpose. Then He will most certainly guide us. But it is no use asking God for counsel about a matter when we have already made up our mind, or our will is at work.
- Word asked for. They came to the prophet for God's direction. Everything turns on what they did with His answer.
- Word rejected. The answer crossed their will. Self-will blinded them, and pride would not admit they were wrong.
- Word downgraded. Blaming Baruch turned God's message into one man's opinion. It is the easy way to disobey without admitting rebellion.
- Word outrun. They fled to Egypt to escape the Chaldeans and fell under the very sword that would have spared them in Judah.
- Word vindicated. They carried the prophet into Egypt with them. There his voice pronounced their doom, and the word they denied caught up with them.
So Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces, and all the people, hearkened not unto the voice of Jehovah to abide in the land of Judah;
Jeremiah had just given God's answer to people who promised to obey it: stay in the land. Verse 4 records what they did instead, and "did not obey the voice of the LORD" is the verdict over the whole chapter.
The refusal in this verse did not begin here. The question these men brought to the prophet was never an open one.
They asked the prophet to pray for them, so that they might have divine guidance about their path. Yet they had already made up their minds to go to Egypt with their whole company (Jer. 42). Let us beware of ever going to God with our minds already made up. It is a serious affront to the Divine Majesty!
They had bound themselves with strong words: whatever God said, they would do it. Verse 4 shows what those words were worth.
Here the real state of the case comes clearly out. Pride and self-will were at work. Their vows and promises were false. Jeremiah says, "You have gone astray at the cost of your lives, for you sent me to the LORD your God, saying, 'Pray for us to the LORD our God, and whatever the LORD our God says, declare to us and we will do it.'" It would have been fine if God's answer had fallen in with their will. But it ran against them, so they rejected it altogether.
(These words come from Jeremiah 42:20. Mackintosh quotes an older wording there, "You dissembled in your hearts" — that is, they had not been honest.)
To remain in the land meant living under the king who had just crushed them. That was the sticking point.
Will was at work. The difficulty lay there. They trusted themselves. They did not trust God. Egypt was near, Nebuchadnezzar at a distance. The one who had chastised the apostate pride of Judah was offensive to them. They refused to bow to the word, or to trust the Lord's working in their favour.
Egypt was more than a place on the map. Kelly draws the line straight to us:
For Israel it was going down into Egypt. For us it is taking counsel in any difficulty from natural wisdom instead of from God. Israel sought that same human wisdom, and Egypt is its symbol in the ancient world.
The verse names Johanan first. He heads the list of those who disobey, and Scripture gives the group he stands with a striking label.
There is something contemptible about these leaders of the remnant. The Holy Spirit calls attention to the "proud men"! After what had happened, no one would have expected pride. They had been so humiliated, and their position at that moment was enough to humble them deeply! Yet some among them still seemed to take pride in being God's people.
"All the people" went, but not all of them chose it. Force put some of them on that road.
Those who believe can afford to be calm and submit. Suppose the hand of power forces them to go here or there. Then it is no longer their responsibility. The guilt lies with those who despise the word of the Lord. Until Jesus returns in glory, the faithful have to swim against the current. That is true above all of those entrusted with the testimony. Where violence overpowers them, they have to suffer.
Babylon held another group of Jews at the same time. Their story runs the opposite way.
These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and disease will consume them. God promises those at Babylon peace and prosperity and plenty for the time being. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt though he pronounces their doom... God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
- Asking — They sought guidance with the decision already taken. Going to God with a made-up mind is a serious affront to Him.
- Promising — Their promise to do whatever God said collapsed the moment His answer crossed their will. A promise only shows its worth when it costs.
- Refusing — Egypt was near and Nebuchadnezzar far away. They trusted themselves, not God. The same instinct in us takes counsel from natural wisdom instead of God.
- Leading — Johanan stands among "the proud men." Humbling circumstances did not make humble hearts. Their pride pulled a whole people down.
- Ending — God promised peace and deliverance to those in Babylon. Those who chose Egypt found sword, famine and disease. Going back to the place God once redeemed them from left no way home.
but Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces, took all the remnant of Judah, that were returned from all nations whither they had been driven, to sojourn in the land of Judah;
This verse records the moment leaders marched a rescued people out of the only land God had promised to bless. God had told Johanan and the captains to stay there; instead they took the returned exiles the other way, into Egypt.
Their promise to obey had sounded wholehearted. Commentators trace what went wrong to a will that was never surrendered.
One thing spoilt these fair words. The later history shows that underneath their good words self-will was at work. They had already decided to take their own course. ... Are there not those who say, like this remnant, "Give us Scripture — give us the word of the Lord — and we will bow to it!" We may well fear that self-will lies behind such fair words.
William Kelly points to what they trusted, and to what looked near.
Will was at work. The difficulty lay there. They trusted themselves. They did not trust God. Egypt was near, Nebuchadnezzar at a distance. The one who had punished the proud rebellion of Judah was offensive to them. They refused to bow to the word, or to trust the Lord to work for them.
The verse describes people who had come back from all the nations where they were driven. Their blessing came with one condition.
The Lord's way is very plain. If this little remnant want to be built up and established, and to enjoy the Lord's presence and His mercies, there is one condition they must meet. They must "remain in this land." However great the failure, however complete the ruin, there would still be blessing for a little remnant — a few out of many. But only so long as they remain on God's ground for God's people. Their king and leaders may have fled. The house of the Lord may be burned to the ground and the walls of Jerusalem broken down. Yet there would still be blessing for those who remained in the land.
Notice who acts in this verse. It is not the people deciding; it is Johanan and the captains taking them.
The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people, and it is the same today. How important, then, that we should turn our eyes and hearts to the one unfailing Leader — to the Lord Himself! ... May the Lord be exalted before us more and more. So may we hold fast to Him though leaders and others fail, as they have done ever since the days of the apostles.
The same leader who had rescued them now ruined them, which writers note as the bitter irony of the chapter.
What a picture the Holy Spirit paints in chapters 42 and 43! The very leader who had been used to deliver the thankful remnant from Ishmael now leads them into Egypt, after pretending to want to know and obey the word of the Lord about them!
The following verse names the prophet and his companion Baruch among those taken. Commentators draw from this a rule about where guilt lies when force overrules faith.
Those who believe can afford to be calm and submit. Suppose the hand of power forces them to go here or there. Then it is no longer their responsibility. The guilt falls on those who despise the word of the Lord. Until Jesus returns in glory, the faithful have to swim against the current, above all those entrusted with the testimony. They must suffer where violence overpowers them.
Another part of Judah had gone to Babylon instead. The contrast shows why this move was fatal.
The story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to that of the remnant in Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and plague will consume them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, though he pronounces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them in Babylon... God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt, but Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To go back to Egypt, then, was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
- Ground. Blessing hung on one thing — staying where God had placed them, however ruined the scene looked.
- Will. They left that ground through self-will, not ignorance. They had decided before they ever asked, and loud promises of obedience hid it.
- Sight. Egypt was near and Babylon far. They measured safety by distance, not by the word God had just given them.
- Leaders. Leaders can carry a whole company off God's ground. That is why our eyes belong on the one unfailing Leader, the Lord Himself.
- Direction. From Babylon there was deliverance. Egypt was the road with no way back. The direction they chose, not the hardship they bore, decided the outcome.
men, and women, and children, and the king's daughters, and every person that Nebuzar-adan the captain of the body-guard had left with Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan, and Jeremiah the prophet, and Baruch the son of Nerijah;
Jeremiah had just delivered God's answer: stay in the land and live. Verse 6 names who the leaders took instead: the whole surviving community, down to the children. With them went the two men who had told them not to go.
The leaders had God's answer and did the opposite. One writer follows the group to the place where they settled.
Then the leaders did not obey the voice of the Lord to stay in the land. They took the remnant of Judah — all the people, including Jeremiah and Baruch — and led them down to Egypt. In the end they settled in Tahpanhes, which was in the northeastern part, on the road out of Egypt to Palestine.
Jeremiah and Baruch did not choose this journey. Force decided it for them. So who carries the blame?
Those who believe can afford to be calm and submit. If power forces them to go here or there, the responsibility is no longer theirs. The guilt belongs to those who despise the word of the Lord. Until Jesus returns in glory, the faithful have to swim against the current, and to suffer where violence overpowers them. This is true above all of those God has entrusted with the testimony.
The leaders could have left Jeremiah behind. They chose not to — and the reason turns out to be self-defeating.
Stubborn in their plan to the end, they rebel against God. They take Jeremiah and faithful Baruch with them, because they do not want to leave behind these witnesses of their disobedience and unbelief. They forget only one thing: they are carrying with them the Word that condemns them. To the end, Jeremiah faithfully uses the gift of prophecy that God had entrusted to him. At Tahpanhes, just as at Jerusalem, he is a witness of the true God.
Jeremiah had an alternative. Babylon's officials respected him, and he could have had a comfortable life there.
Nebuchadnezzar and his servants stood out in honouring Jeremiah. They were in sharp contrast with the priests, the false prophets, and even kings Jehoiachim and Zedekiah. Still, Jeremiah truly loved God's people, even at their lowest and in their ugly ingratitude to him. He could have gone to Babylon, where comfort and honour were certain. Instead he chose to suffer with the most despised people in the land. They behaved as badly as ever, and against his inspired warnings they carried him down into Egypt, rather than stay under the rule of Babylon.
At this moment two groups of Jewish survivors were alive: this one heading for Egypt, and the earlier captives in Babylon.
This short history is especially interesting. The story of this remnant is a complete contrast to the story of the remnant at Babylon. These people go down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and disease will destroy them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the present. These people carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, though he announces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon, where Daniel prevails in prayer with God for their deliverance and restoration. God redeemed the people out of Egypt at the beginning, but Babylon became the place of their captivity after they had turned away from the Lord. So going back to Egypt was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
Egypt was no refuge. The place they stopped at held a brick kiln, and stones marked the spot.
Did not the brick kiln remind them of Israel's former slavery in Egypt? They had reached this spot again while trying to escape the rule of the king of Babylon, the Lord's servant! Had they escaped? Had they found the freedom they expected by disobeying the word of the prophet? God would send His servant Nebuchadnezzar to that very spot where the stones lay, and would set his throne on them!
- Counted. The captains took everyone left in Judah: men, women, children, the royal daughters, and the two faithful men, Jeremiah and Baruch.
- Carried. The leaders dragged the prophet along, so they carried with them the very Word that condemned them. Jeremiah kept testifying at Tahpanhes, just as he had at Jerusalem.
- Chosen. Jeremiah could have had honour in Babylon. He chose to suffer with the people who had rejected him.
- Compelled. When force decides where a believer goes, the guilt belongs to those who despised God's word. The believer can stay calm.
- Contrasted. Babylon held a captive remnant with deliverance ahead. Egypt held a self-willed one with none. The road you choose under fear decides where it ends.
and they came into the land of Egypt for they hearkened not unto the voice of Jehovah. And they came as far as Tahpanhes.
Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.
And the word of Jehovah came to Jeremiah in Tahpanhes, saying,
Jeremiah had warned the surviving Jews not to run to Egypt. They went anyway, and dragged him and Baruch along with them. Now God speaks to His prophet again, in a foreign town at the edge of Egypt. What He says will reach them in the very place they picked as their escape.
The leaders made Jeremiah and Baruch come with them. One writer names the one thing they overlooked.
They are stubborn in their purpose to the end. They revolt against God and take Jeremiah and faithful Baruch with them, because they do not want to leave behind these witnesses to their disobedience and their unbelief. They forget only one thing: they are carrying with them the Word that condemns them. To the end, Jeremiah keeps faithfully using the gift of prophecy that God had entrusted to him. At Tahpanhes, just as at Jerusalem, he is a witness of the true God.
Jeremiah was timid by nature. Being dragged along did not stop him speaking.
But this does not silence the prophet, timid and sensitive as he naturally was… The "proud men" never guessed that the man they were carrying along with them would soon speak in Egypt to announce their doom. And it would come by the hand of the very conqueror they hoped to shut out, using Egypt's king as an unbreakable wall against him. A vain hope, to escape the hand of the God they despised!
One writer points to what has been dug up at Tahpanhes, and to what the older phrase "brick kiln" means.
Then the Lord told Jeremiah to take great stones and bury them at the entry of Pharaoh's house in Tahpanhes, so that all the men of Judah could see it. In 1886 Professor Petrie, an expert on ancient Egypt, dug up a brick pavement at Tahpanhes in front of what seems to have been a palace. This was probably the place where Jeremiah hid the stones. The ruin was Kasr el Bint Jehudi, which means "the palace of the daughter of Judah." That was plainly the place given to the daughters of Zedekiah. The word brick-kiln means a pavement of bricks.
God had the stones hidden in full view of the men who had come to Egypt for safety.
At the very spot they had now reached, at Tahpanhes, God tells the prophet to hide some great stones before their eyes, in the brick kiln at the entry of Pharaoh's house. What a powerful sign this was! Did the brick kiln not remind them of Israel's former slavery in Egypt? They had come back to this spot while trying to escape the rule of the king of Babylon — the servant of the Lord! Had they escaped? Had disobeying the prophet's word given them the freedom they expected? To that very spot, where these stones now lay, God would send His servant Nebuchadnezzar and set his throne on them!
God calls Nebuchadnezzar His servant. One writer weighs that title against the one Zedekiah once held.
It was no longer Zedekiah, My servant, but it was Nebuchadnezzar, My servant. The children of Israel and of Judah were about to lose their special place as His nation, too. It was now a question, not of being His servant as a special honour, but merely in providence. Nebuchadnezzar, the idolatrous Gentile, could be His servant in this way as much as any other.
Egypt looked like an exit. It turned out to be the same road, further along.
God's discipline is not always immediate but it is always perfectly designed, proportionate and effective. If we run away from discipline the problem that caused it will catch up with us (and the outcome is likely to be even worse). Had these people remained in Jerusalem and accepted the Babylonian yoke, they could have lived quietly in their own country. But, having fled to Egypt, they were still in Nebuchadnezzar's reach and would die.
One writer traces where that choice always ends.
So it is always. Under God's righteous government our sin soon becomes our own chastening and the world's grief. What our blindness built on as solid rock turns out to be quicksand — the plaything of waves and winds on the day of reckoning, which comes fast.
- The word follows — God speaks again in Tahpanhes. The men who carried Jeremiah off were carrying the word that condemned them.
- The word marks the spot — great stones sunk in the brick pavement at Pharaoh's gate, a sign set where Israel's old slavery began.
- The word names its agent — God calls Nebuchadnezzar, the king they ran from, His servant. That was providence, not honour, and Israel was about to lose its special place.
- The word overtakes — discipline you dodge is only discipline delayed. Egypt lay well inside the reach of the king they feared.
- The word calls home — the way is not ours to choose. Staying where God says is safer than any escape we pick for ourselves.
Take great stones in thy hand, and hide them in the clay in the brick-kiln, which is at the entry of Pharaoh's house in Tahpanhes, in the sight of the Jews,
The people who asked Jeremiah to pray for guidance ignored the answer. Then they dragged him into Egypt with them. At Tahpanhes God speaks to him again — not in a speech, but in an act, with stones, clay and a royal doorway. Why does God ask His prophet to bury stones where no one will see them, and what does the hiding place itself say to the men watching him do it?
God gives this sign to people who already knew the safe path and refused it. One writer traces the whole disaster back to that refusal:
At one point, those who were told to stay in the city decided to escape the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar by fleeing to Egypt. Gedaliah was the governor the Babylonians had set over the few left in Jerusalem, and he had been murdered. At the last minute, it occurred to them that they had not asked the Lord whether this was His way for them. So they quickly asked Jeremiah to consult Him. When the answer came, and was negative, they refused to listen.
They thought distance from Babylon meant safety. The opposite was true:
Had they remained quietly in the land subject to the authority of the Chaldean king whom God had placed over them, they would have been preserved. But they, choosing human policy, thought it was safer to go down into Egypt, whereas it proved to be the contrary.
Commentators describe the spot differently. One takes the "brick-kiln" as a paved area and points to a dig there:
In 1886 the Egyptologist Professor Petrie dug at Tahpanhes. He found a brick pavement in front of what looks like a palace. This was probably the place where Jeremiah hid the stones. The ruin is called Kasr el Bint Jehudi, which means "the palace of the daughter of Judah." The word brick-kiln means a pavement of bricks.
Another hears in the brick-kiln a reminder of Israel's slavery in Egypt, and sees what God would later set on those stones:
How eloquent was this sign! Did not the brick kiln remind them of Israel's former slavery in Egypt? They had reached this spot again in their effort to escape the dominion of the king of Babylon, the servant of the Lord! Had they escaped? Had they found the liberty they expected by disobeying the word of the prophet in this way? To that very spot where these stones were placed, God would send His servant Nebuchadnezzar and set his throne upon them! Egypt and its wealth and its goods would be handed over to him: and so it happened.
God tells Jeremiah to bury the stones "in the sight of the men of Judah." The stones vanish into the clay. The witnesses do not, and neither does the word tied to them:
Is this not a striking message? The stones would have been well fixed in the mortar as a solemn witness of these words. Some time later Jeremiah's prophecy was fulfilled. Nebuchadnezzar came and took Egypt — the same Nebuchadnezzar they had been afraid of in Jerusalem so that they ran away from him.
The proud men carried Jeremiah along with them as baggage. They were carrying their own sentence too:
"All the proud men" never guessed what they were doing. They were carrying with them the one man whose voice would soon speak in Egypt to pronounce their doom. And that doom would come by the hand of the very conqueror they hoped to shut out, using the power of the king of the south as a wall he could not cross. Vain hope to escape the hand of the God they despised!
The principle behind the sign reaches far past Tahpanhes:
So it is always. In righteous government our sin soon becomes our own chastening and the world's sorrow. What our blindness built on as solid rock turns out to be quicksand, tossed by waves and winds in the swift-coming day when God comes to judge.
The stones speak to anyone tempted to run from a hard situation instead of facing it:
God's discipline does not always come at once. But it is always perfectly designed, proportionate and effective. If we run away from discipline the problem that caused it will catch up with us (and the outcome is likely to be even worse).
The positive side is not restlessness but staying put where God has placed us:
This is an important lesson for believers who wander here and there in their restless search for an easy path. They do not abide in Christ where God has set them. We are not left to choose our own way. To do otherwise is to increase the difficulties for ourselves and others. To abide in Him is to assure blessing and increase for ourselves and others also.
- Refusal. They asked for God's answer, disliked it, and went to Egypt anyway. God sends this sign to people already running from a word they knew.
- Place. The stones go into the clay at Pharaoh's doorway. One writer links the spot to an excavated brick pavement by a palace. Another hears in the brick-kiln a reminder of Israel's slavery in Egypt.
- Witness. Hidden in the clay, yet buried "in the sight of the men of Judah," the stones stand as a silent witness to a word that later came true.
- Throne. God would set Nebuchadnezzar's throne on those buried stones. The shelter they ran to became the seat of their judge.
- Lesson. Run from discipline and it follows you; abide where God has set you, and the blessing reaches others as well as yourself.
and say unto them, Thus saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel Behold, I will send and take Nebuchadrezzar the king of Babylon, my servant, and will set his throne upon these stones which I have hidden, and he shall spread his royal pavilion over them.
The people Jeremiah warned have dragged him into Egypt, and at their first stop God gives him one more sign: bury great stones outside Pharaoh's palace. Then he must name the king whose throne will stand on them — and God calls that pagan conqueror His own servant.
Tahpanhes itself carried a message for people who had just run from Babylon to Egypt.
At the very spot they then reached, at Tahpanhes, God tells the prophet to hide some great stones in front of them. They were to go in the brick kiln at the entrance of Pharaoh's house. What a powerful sign this was! Didn't the brick kiln remind them of Israel's former slavery in Egypt? They had reached this spot again in their effort to escape the rule of the king of Babylon, the servant of the Lord! Had they escaped? Had they found the liberty they expected by disobeying the word of the prophet? To that very spot where these stones were placed, God would send His servant Nebuchadnezzar and set his throne on them! He would spread his royal canopy over them! Egypt, with its wealth and its goods, would be given into his hands — and so it happened.
The phrase marks a change in who holds God's commission. God had called Israel's kings His servants; now that honour passes to a foreign conqueror.
That last phrase is a remarkable word. It was no longer Zedekiah, My servant, but Nebuchadnezzar, My servant. The children of Israel and of Judah were about to lose their special place as His nation too. It was now a question, not of being His servant as a special honour, but merely in providence. Nebuchadnezzar was a Gentile who worshipped idols, yet he could be His servant in this way as much as anyone else.
Another writer traces this change to the start of a whole era of world rule by Gentile kings:
God speaks as Creator, and in His sovereignty He appoints Nebuchadnezzar as head over the nations... not for ever, but for a time. God appointed a new form of government, because Jerusalem had failed. The rule of God through the house of David was to pass away. The Lord chooses an imperial head from among the Gentiles. He makes Nebuchadnezzar His servant; with him and his rule begin the times of the Gentiles.
The refugees went to Egypt for safety. The throne on the stones says Nebuchadnezzar would arrive there too.
The prophet announced what would fall on the Jews who tried to escape by going down into Egypt. He showed them that there they would only meet more trouble at the hands of Nebuchadnezzar. They could have stayed quietly in the land, under the authority of the Chaldean king whom God had placed over them. Then they would have been safe. But they chose human policy and thought it was safer to go down into Egypt, and it proved to be the opposite.
Another writer turns this into a general rule about God's discipline:
God's discipline does not always come at once. But it is always perfectly designed, fair in measure and effective. If we run away from discipline, the problem that caused it will catch up with us — and the outcome is likely to be even worse.
A dig may have found the very spot, and history records the invasion that followed.
In 1886 the Egyptologist Professor Petrie dug at Tahpanhes. He found a brick pavement in front of what seems to be a palace. It was probably the place where Jeremiah hid the stones... The words "brick kiln" mean a pavement of bricks. Then, after burying the stones, he announced that Nebuchadnezzar would come and set his throne there too. He would conquer Egypt, strike it and burn the idol temples there. Such an invasion took place about 568 BC, when the Egyptian king Amasis was defeated.
One writer reads the whole episode as a rule, not a one-off case:
So it always is. In righteous government our sin soon becomes our own chastening and the world's sorrow. What our blindness built on as rock turns out to be quicksand. Waves and winds toss it about in the day of reckoning, which comes fast.
- Servant — Judah's kings once wore this title. Now it rests on a pagan conqueror. Nebuchadnezzar serves God in providence, not in piety.
- Throne — Jeremiah buried the stones; the throne set on them opens an age when Gentile rulers govern, not David's house — and only for a time.
- Kiln — The brick kiln recalled Israel's old slavery in Egypt. They ran for freedom to the place where they had once been slaves.
- Reach — Fleeing the rod does not shorten it. At home, under Babylon's yoke, they would have been safe. In Egypt they met more of Nebuchadnezzar.
- Rock — What unbelief treats as solid ground proves to be quicksand. The one safe place is the one God appoints, however hard it looks.
And he shall come and smite the land of Egypt such as are for death to death, and such as are for captivity to captivity; and such as are for the sword to the sword.
In Egypt, Jeremiah buried stones in the ground as a sign. The king of Babylon would set his throne on that spot — and this verse says what his coming would mean for the people who had fled there to be safe.
These people left Judah for one reason: they were afraid of the Babylonians. One writer traces where that fear took them.
They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar, but they only fall under the sword that would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there and submitted to the king. In Egypt they give themselves up to idolatry, so that the wrath of God might come upon them to the end.
The sword was never their real danger. Disobedience was.
The proud men who took Jeremiah with them to Egypt had no idea who they were carrying.
The "proud men" never expected what they were carrying with them. It was the one man whose voice would soon speak in Egypt to announce their doom. And it would come by the hand of the very conqueror they hoped to shut out, using the power of the king of the south as a wall he could not cross. What a vain hope — to escape the hand of the God they despised!
The one who comes and strikes is not acting on his own. God gives him a title that runs through the whole book.
Nebuchadnezzar, whom the Lord calls "My Servant," is spoken of about forty times. He is raised up to carry out His judgment on Israel, and on other nations too. The Lord says, "I have given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar, the King of Babylon, My Servant: … and all nations shall serve him." Dominion is given to him by God; it is taken away from Israel.
The verse sorts people into three groups: pestilence, captivity, and the sword. Older translations read "death" where the ESV reads "pestilence." One writer draws out the principle behind that sorting.
So it is always. Under God's righteous government our sin soon becomes our own chastening and the world's grief. What our blindness built on as rock turns out to be quicksand, tossed by waves and winds in the day of visitation that comes so quickly.
This was not a threat that stayed in the air. One writer points to how it turned out in history.
Then, after burying the stones, he announced that Nebuchadnezzar would come and set his throne there too, that he would conquer Egypt, strike it, and burn the idol temples there. Such an invasion took place about 568 B.C., when the Egyptian king Amasis was defeated.
The verse has a practical edge. It shows what happens when people run from correction instead of taking it.
God's discipline is not always immediate, but it is always perfectly designed, proportionate and effective. If we run away from discipline, the problem that caused it will catch up with us (and the outcome is likely to be even worse). Had these people remained in Jerusalem and accepted the Babylonian yoke, they could have lived quietly in their own country. But having fled to Egypt, they were still within Nebuchadnezzar's reach and would die.
- Flight. They crossed a border to escape Nebuchadnezzar. He came to Egypt anyway, so the border bought them nothing.
- Servant. The Lord calls him "My Servant" and gives him dominion. The invading army is God's instrument, not Egypt's bad luck.
- Sorting. Each group gets its portion: pestilence, captivity, the sword. This is God's righteous government, where sin becomes its own chastening.
- Reversal. Egypt looked like rock. It proved to be quicksand, and the king they sheltered under was defeated.
- Return. Run from discipline and the cause of it follows you. Staying and taking it is the safer road.
And I will kindle a fire in the houses of the gods of Egypt, and he shall burn them, and carry them away captive; and he shall array himself with the land of Egypt, as a shepherd putteth on his garment; and he shall go forth from thence in peace.
The people Jeremiah warned have dragged him into Egypt, to the border town of Tahpanhes, where they thought Babylon could never reach them. There he announces fire on Egypt's temples — so whose hand lights it, and what becomes of a refuge chosen against God's word?
The wording divides the act in two. God says He will kindle the fire; the king does the burning. Jeremiah's book keeps giving this foreign king a startling title.
Nebuchadnezzar, whom the Lord calls "My Servant," appears about forty times. The Lord raised him up to carry out His judgment on Israel, and on other nations too. The Lord says, "Now I have given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, my servant… All the nations shall serve him." God gives him dominion and takes it away from Israel.
The fire falls on temples, and the gods inside go into captivity like prisoners. One writer dates the invasion that carried this out and names the sun temples involved.
Jeremiah announced that Nebuchadnezzar would conquer Egypt, strike it, and burn the idol temples there. Such an invasion took place about 568 B.C., when the Egyptian King Amasis was defeated. The pillars mentioned in verse 13 are obelisks, and Beth-Shemesh means "the house of the Sun" (Heliopolis or On).
The ESV has Nebuchadnezzar cleaning out Egypt like a shepherd cleaning his cloak; older translations have him wearing the land like a garment. Either way the land is his to handle, and he walks away in peace. Jeremiah hid great stones in the brick kiln at the palace gate as a sign.
Did the brick kiln not remind them of Israel's old slavery in Egypt? They had come back to this spot in their effort to escape the rule of the king of Babylon, the Lord's servant! Had they escaped? Had they found the liberty they expected by disobeying the word of the prophet? To that very spot where these stones were placed God would send His servant Nebuchadnezzar and set his throne on them! His royal pavilion would be spread over them! Egypt and its wealth and its goods would be given into his hands: and it was so.
What does Egypt stand for, and why should its wealth fall to this king?
Egypt pictures the world — the place God rescued His people from by His grace, and to seek its help in anything is a serious offence in His sight… The Lord considered that wages were due to Nebuchadnezzar for his service in destroying Tyre. That wealthy trading city did not give its captors rich plunder, because Tyrian ships had carried a great deal of treasure away to the west. The wealth of Egypt was the Lord's payment to the man He used to carry out His righteous judgements. That wealth included the silver and gold Pharaoh Necho had carried there from Jerusalem (Ezek. 29:18).
The men who forced Jeremiah into Egypt expected to find safety there.
Little did "all the proud men" expect what they were carrying along with them. They had brought the one man whose voice would so soon speak out in Egypt to pronounce their doom. And it would come by the hand of the very conqueror they hoped to shut out, using the power of the king of the south as a wall he could not pass. Vain hope to escape the hand of the God they despised!
God corrects His own people on the same principle.
God's discipline does not always come at once. But it is always perfectly designed, rightly measured and effective. If we run away from discipline, the problem that caused it will catch up with us. The outcome is likely to be even worse. Had these people stayed in Jerusalem and accepted the Babylonian yoke, they could have lived quietly in their own country. But having fled to Egypt, they were still within Nebuchadnezzar's reach and would die.
The pull to move somewhere easier did not end with the people in this chapter.
This is an important lesson for believers who go here and there in restless efforts to find an easy path, and who do not remain in Christ where God has set them. We are not left to choose our own way; we are to stay in the path of God's will and not depart from it. There are difficulties, no doubt. There were difficulties with this remnant. We are still to remain in Christ. To do otherwise is to increase the difficulties for ourselves and others.
- God's fire. God Himself lights the blaze in Egypt's temples; the army only carries out what He has decided.
- God's servant. The Lord calls Babylon's king His servant. He raised him up to judge, and gave him the rule Israel had lost.
- God's reach. He handles the land like a shepherd handling his cloak, takes its wealth as wages for destroying Tyre, and walks away untouched.
- No escape. They ran from Nebuchadnezzar and ran straight into his throne. Run from correction and the trouble follows you, worse than before.
- Stay put. At home under the yoke they could have lived in peace. Hold the path God has set; do not hunt for an easier one.
And he shall break the pillars of Beth-shemesh, which is in the land of Egypt; and the houses of the gods of Egypt shall he burn with fire.
The people who begged Jeremiah for God's word then refused it and took him down into Egypt with them. At Tahpanhes he buries stones in the pavement, a sign that Babylon's throne will follow them there. His message ends not with armies or palaces but with smashed stone pillars and burning temples. So what was God's real quarrel with Egypt?
The ESV calls the place Heliopolis; older translations keep the Hebrew name, Beth-shemesh. The name itself says what went on there:
An idolatrous temple in Egypt, Jeremiah 43:13. Because its name means "house of the sun," people take it to be the same as On, or Heliopolis, a place linked with sun-worship.
One writer names the pillars and dates the invasion that fulfilled this word:
Then, after burying the stones, he announced that Nebuchadnezzar would come and set his throne there too. He would conquer Egypt, strike it, and burn the idol temples there. Such an invasion took place about 568 BC, when the Egyptian king Amasis was defeated. The pillars mentioned in verse 13 are obelisks, and Beth-Shemesh means "the house of the Sun" (Heliopolis or On).
Why do the temples get the last word in the sentence? Commenting on a similar prophecy against Egypt, one writer traces this back to the night of the passover:
It is with the gods of Egypt, as at first so now at last, that God's main controversy lies. This was before Him when the destroyer went through the land and struck the firstborn on the night of the passover. It is before Him here when He adds that there shall be no more a prince of the land of Egypt.
God calls the man who does this breaking His own servant. That title had belonged to Zedekiah, Judah's king:
That is a remarkable word. It was no longer Zedekiah, My servant, but Nebuchadnezzar, My servant. The children of Israel and of Judah were about to lose their special place as His nation, too. Being His servant was now a matter of providence, not of special honour. Nebuchadnezzar, a Gentile who worshipped idols, could be His servant in this way as much as anyone else.
The spot chosen for the stones carried a message of its own:
How eloquent this sign was! Did the brick kiln not remind them of Israel's former slavery in Egypt? They had reached this spot again in their effort to escape the rule of the king of Babylon, the servant of the Lord! Had they escaped? Had they found the liberty they expected by disobeying the word of the prophet? God would send His servant Nebuchadnezzar to the very spot where these stones lay, and set his throne on them!
They carried the prophet into Egypt with them, and with him they carried their own sentence:
"All the proud men" never expected that they were carrying along with them the one whose voice would so soon speak in Egypt to pronounce their doom. And that doom would come by the hand of the very conqueror they hoped to shut out, using the power of the king of the south as a barrier no one could pass. What a vain hope, to escape the hand of the God they despised!
One writer applies this to anyone tempted to escape a hard situation by turning to the world:
If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We get tired of strife and divisions and weakness, but going into the world does not improve matters.
- Sun. The Heliopolis of this verse is Beth-shemesh, "house of the sun." Also called On, it was Egypt's centre of sun-worship, and its pillars were obelisks.
- Gods. Breaking those pillars shows where God's controversy really lay. It was with the gods of Egypt, from the night of the passover to the last.
- Servant. The hand that breaks them is Nebuchadnezzar's, and God calls him "My servant." The title is not an honour here but providence, once Judah had lost its place.
- Sign. The stones hidden in the brick pavement at Tahpanhes marked the exact spot where Babylon's throne would stand. The invasion came about 568 BC.
- Escape. Those who ran to Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar carried both the prophet and their sentence with them. No border keeps out the God whose word they despised.
The word that came to Jeremiah concerning all the Jews who dwelt in the land of Egypt, who dwelt at Migdol, and at Tahpanhes, and at Noph, and in the country of Pathros, saying,
At the end of chapter 43 Judah's own leaders took the last survivors down into Egypt, and carried Jeremiah with them. Chapter 44 opens with God's word finding them there, scattered through the towns of Egypt. So why does God still speak to people who had run that far to get away from what He said?
They had a direct warning from the Lord, and they hardened their hearts against it. One writer shows how fast a refusal like that gathers speed, and why God still sends a message.
The path of unbelief is a rapid descent when the heart hardens itself against a direct warning of the Lord. The greater the show of godliness before, the deeper the fall... God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they desert Him for another, woe to them! It cannot but be to their shame, sorrow and ruin. Even when they have revolted to the very end, they are not left without a message, in case anyone might yet hear and escape.
The four names are not decoration. They show how far the runaways had scattered across a foreign country, and God's word reaches every one of those settlements.
The message is about all the Jews who were now living in Egypt. As well as being in Tahpanhes, they were also in Noph (Memphis) and in Pathros, which was in upper Egypt. Ancient papyri in Aramaic came to light not long ago. They show that a Jewish colony lived in that part of Egypt. In his message Jeremiah reminds them how God had dealt with Jerusalem and Judah for their idol worship, though He had sent prophets to warn them. And now they were doing the same thing in Egypt.
The message that follows goes back over what God had already done to Jerusalem. Why repeat a record of failure? One writer puts the question and answers it.
Did God take pleasure in recounting their sins, and His judgments as well as His warnings? No, it was His pity and His desire that those in Egypt might at last listen... Imminent danger hung over them; Egypt would be a useless shelter, but in the meantime it was far too certain a decoy into idolatry.
Two groups of Jews were now outside the land. One was captive in Babylon; the other had chosen Egypt for itself. Their two stories end very differently.
The story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to that of the remnant in Babylon. This group goes down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and disease will consume them. Those in Babylon have the promise of peace and prosperity and plenty for the time being. This group carries Jeremiah into Egypt even though he announces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon, where Daniel prevails in prayer with God for their deliverance and restoration. God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt, but Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To go back to Egypt, then, was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
Egypt was the country God had brought them out of in the first place. Running back to it for safety was not a new mistake, and one writer refuses to treat it as a fault belonging only to them.
Going down to Egypt for help was the constant snare of the people of God. Yet God had delivered them out of that land, and they had seen His judgment on it in their own deliverance. Yet again and again they could turn back to it. Sadly, it is an inconsistency that not one of us who knows himself can be a stranger to! Happy are those who are taught by some means at last to say, as the apostle says for Christians: "For we are the circumcision, who worship by the Spirit of God and glory in Christ Jesus and put no confidence in the flesh."
- Disobedience put them there. They hardened their hearts against a direct warning from the Lord and went to Egypt anyway. The greater the earlier show of godliness, the deeper the fall.
- Distance did not silence God. From Migdol to Pathros in upper Egypt, He names every place they had scattered to.
- Pity explains the message. God goes back over Jerusalem's ruin not for the pleasure of it, but so that those in Egypt might at last listen.
- Direction decided their future. Babylon, the place of their captivity, held deliverance; Egypt, which they chose, was a useless shelter and a decoy into idolatry.
- Danger remains ours. Turning back to what God once delivered us from is a snare no one who knows himself can claim to be a stranger to.
Thus saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel Ye have seen all the evil that I have brought upon Jerusalem, and upon all the cities of Judah; and behold they are, this day, a waste, and no man dwelleth therein,
God speaks these words in Egypt, not in Jerusalem, to survivors of Judah's ruin who had fled there against His word. He opens by pointing them back to the empty cities of Judah — a disaster He says He Himself brought.
These people had already heard where safety lay. They went to Egypt after God's word had reached them:
The path of unbelief drops fast once the heart hardens itself against a direct warning of the Lord. And the louder the claim to godliness before, the deeper the fall. Going down into Egypt for safety was not natural for these people. They had always bowed to Babylon against their will, and they dreaded the anger of the Babylonian king because of the murder of the governor and the others. But it was a fatal step once the prophet gave them the word of the Lord. That word promised them safety in the land under Nebuchadnezzar, and destruction in Egypt. Egypt was where their impulse — indeed their determination — drove them, to shelter there as a sensible precaution. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they desert Him for another, it will be to their shame, sorrow and ruin.
Even after this ruin, the few left in the land could have lived there in peace. They only had to accept the place God had given them:
Even at this last hour, this remnant could have submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar. Then peace would have reigned in the land, and the few who remained would have kept it. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no thought of trusting in the Lord. They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth. They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. But they only fall under the sword that would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there under the king.
These people had settled across Egypt, and they had carried Judah's sin with them:
The message concerns all the Jews who were now living in Egypt. Besides Tahpanhes, they were also in Noph (Memphis) and in Pathros, in upper Egypt. Ancient papyri in Aramaic, found not long ago, show that a Jewish colony lived in that part of Egypt. In his message Jeremiah reminds them how God had dealt with Jerusalem and Judah because of their idol worship. He had even sent prophets to warn them. And now they were doing the same thing in Egypt.
One writer sets what man is beside what God is. He then warns anyone who thinks that going into the world will make life easier:
If all this shows what man is in self-will and rebellion, it also shows what God is in patient grace and goodness (Jer. 44:4; 2 Peter 3:9). Grace follows them even into Egypt and still pleads with them; but nothing humbles them or brings them to repentance (Jer. 44:5-10). But there is a limit to patience, and judgment follows from which there is no escape (Jer. 44:11-14). If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We get tired of strife and divisions and weakness, but going into the world does not mend matters. We see here the sad effect of going into the world; it left them without heart or conscience.
Judah's survivors went two ways: some into Egypt, some into Babylon. The two paths ended very differently:
This short history has a special interest. The story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to the remnant in Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and disease will consume them. Those in Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, even though he announces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them in Babylon. There Daniel prevails in prayer with God for their rescue and restoration. At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity when they turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
- Seen — God starts with what they could not deny. They had watched Jerusalem and the cities of Judah become an empty ruin.
- Warned — God had sent prophets long before the ruin came. Before Egypt, Jeremiah told them peace lay in staying under Nebuchadnezzar.
- Refused — Their hearts hardened against a direct word from God. They dressed a fatal step up as a sensible precaution.
- Followed — Grace went after them into Egypt and kept pleading. It showed what God is, even while they showed what man is.
- Repeated — Nothing humbled them. The same idol worship that emptied Judah reappeared in Egypt, and judgment followed it there.
because of their wickedness which they have committed to provoke me to anger, in that they went to burn incense to serve other gods which they knew not, they, [nor] ye, nor your fathers.
Jerusalem has already fallen. This word comes to the survivors who ran to Egypt — people who watched the judgment happen and then repeated the sin that caused it. God names the evil exactly: offerings and service given to gods that no generation of Israel had ever known.
This message finds the people of Judah in the one place God had told them not to go. One commentator traces how a people gets that far:
The path of unbelief drops away fast once the heart hardens against a direct warning from the Lord. The greater the show of godliness before, the deeper the fall... God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name. If they desert Him for another, woe to them! It can only end in shame, sorrow and ruin. Even when they have revolted as far as they can go, He does not leave them without a message, in case any might still hear and escape.
Two groups of survivors were left, and their stories run in opposite directions:
This short history has a special interest. The story of this group stands out as a complete contrast to the story of the group taken to Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and disease will destroy them. Those at Babylon are promised peace and prosperity and plenty for the time being... At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. So going back to Egypt was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
These gods were strangers to Israel's whole history. One commentator identifies one of them:
She was the female form of Baal, or Bel. She went by the names Beltis, Ashtaroth, Astarte, Alitta, Mylitta, Aphrodite, and others. Her worship involved the grossest immorality.
The verse names three groups: the people who did this, the ones listening now, and their fathers. One commentator explains what that piling up means:
Here we see sin inherited. Under the government of God, the people are held responsible for the sins of their fathers. In moral terms, their sins were the pile-up of all the sins that went before them. God had borne with those sins in His patience. They despised that patience, and used it as their chance to plunge deeper into evil.
God's anger is real, but the ruin fell on the people who chose the idols. Egypt promised safety and delivered the opposite:
"Why do you commit this great evil against yourselves, to cut off from you man and woman, infant and child, from the midst of Judah, leaving you no remnant?"... Danger hung over them. Egypt would be a useless shelter, and at the same time far too sure a trap into idolatry.
Why list all this again? One commentator answers that question directly:
Did God take pleasure in going over their sins, His judgments and His warnings? No. It was His pity, and His desire that those in Egypt might listen at last.
The record was an appeal. Another commentator sums up what they had already seen, and refused:
They had seen with their own eyes the destruction and ruin that God had brought on Judah and Jerusalem because of their wickedness. He had begged them: "Oh, do not do this abominable thing that I hate!" They did not listen. So the judgment that waited long came at last with fury and anger. They are told to let that lesson teach them not to provoke the Lord to wrath any more by their abominable idolatry.
- Warned. God begged them to stop long before the fire fell. The ruin of Jerusalem was not sudden. It was the end of a patience they had despised.
- Inherited. The charge names the hearers and their fathers alike. Sin piled up over the years, and each generation used God's patience to sink further.
- Unknown. The gods they chose were strangers to their whole history. The worship that went with them was full of gross immorality.
- Self-destroying. Turning to other gods was an evil they committed against themselves. God's anger fell, but the loss was theirs.
- Still spoken to. They had revolted as far as they could go. They had fled to the one country that could not save them. Still God sent a message, so that some might hear and escape.
And I sent unto you all my servants the prophets, rising early and sending, saying, Oh, do not this abominable thing which I hate!
This verse looks back over a long history. God recalls how He kept sending prophet after prophet to Judah. Each one carried the same plea, long before the ruin fell. He speaks it to survivors now living in Egypt. Why repeat old warnings to people who ignored them? And why does He hate what they are doing?
One writer sets two things side by side: what these people were in themselves, and what God was toward them.
If all this shows what man is in self-will and rebellion, it also shows what God is in patient grace and goodness (Jeremiah 44:4; 2 Peter 3:9). Grace follows them even into Egypt, and still pleads with them; but nothing humbles them or brings them to repentance. But there is a limit to patience, and judgment follows from which there is no escape.
The same writer adds a warning: "If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake."
Here God goes back over what He once did — the prophets He sent, the plea He made. One writer asks why He would open such painful ground again.
Did God take pleasure in recounting their sins, and His judgments as well as His warnings? No — it was His pity and His desire that those in Egypt might at last listen.
The same writer says why Egypt could not save them: "Egypt would be a useless shelter, but meanwhile it was all too sure a lure into idolatry."
One writer draws out the picture behind God's sending. The people matched His energy, but used it the other way.
As the Lord rose early to send them messages and warnings, they rose early to indulge in their wickedness.
The thing God hates here is idolatry. One writer shows how far God's view of it sits from man's casual one.
In every age, nothing shows the gap between God's word and men's thoughts more clearly than this. People treat idols and strange gods lightly, and God hates that, above all in His own people. There may be no deliberate plan to abandon His worship. It may only be what they count a small thing — going along with idolatry now and then, while still professing His name. But God absolutely rejects any such unholy compromise, quite apart from the danger, for those who allow it, of complete revolt from Him. It strikes at His majesty, at holiness and truth, and is intolerable in His eyes.
One writer traces the whole sequence: what the people had already seen, what God asked of them, and what their refusal brought.
They had seen with their own eyes the destruction and desolation God had brought on Judah and Jerusalem for their wickedness. He had pleaded earnestly with them, saying, "Oh, do not do this abomination that I hate!" But they did not listen. So the judgment that had waited long came at last with fury and anger.
One writer applies this to readers today. God's habit has not changed: He warns before He judges.
Why does the Spirit warn you so often? Why does He so often bring your own case, as it were, before you? Why? Is it not because God always warns before He judges? Is it not that He often gives the unsaved soul the opportunity of escape, though sadly, they pay no attention to it? Yes, He is a God of mercy now, though one day He will be a God of judgment to those who scorn and reject His offered mercy.
- Sent — God did not judge Judah in silence. He sent prophet after prophet, long before the ruin came.
- Early — He rose early to send His warnings. His people rose just as early to spoil their own doings.
- Hated — what He asked them to drop was no small habit. Idolatry strikes at His majesty, and He will not tolerate it.
- Followed — grace pursued them even into Egypt and pleaded again. Going over their sins was pity, not pleasure in accusing.
- Limited — patience has an end. The judgment that waited long fell at last. The same God still warns before He judges.
But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear to turn from their wickedness, to burn no incense unto other gods.
God speaks here to the Jews who had fled to Egypt. He starts with their own history: prophets sent again and again, and a people who would not listen or turn from their evil. This verse explains why Judah lies in ruins, and God sets it in front of survivors doing the very same thing.
Before threatening anything, God reminds the refugees of what they have already watched happen. One writer sets out the flow of the chapter, including the plea God had made through His servants:
In Egypt the word came to Jeremiah about them all (Jer. 44:1-14). They had seen with their own eyes the ruin and desolation that God brought on Judah and Jerusalem because of their wickedness. He had begged them, "Oh, do not do this abomination that I hate." But they did not listen. So the judgment that held off so long came at last with fury and anger.
This verse shows one side of the story. The other side is God sending messenger after messenger, and the reason He gave for it:
All through their history, God's patience rises above their sin. Still, they turned a deaf ear and wanted nothing to do with His correction. The Lord "sent to them by His messengers, rising up early and sending, because He had compassion on His people and on His dwelling place." But they mocked His messengers, despised His words, and abused the prophets. In the end the Lord's anger rose against His people until there was no remedy.
They were not short of light. They were unwilling. One writer traces what that stubbornness leads to:
God's patience waits. More than that, it uses every means to call back to sincerity and to Himself those who hold the truth, or at least its outward form. The most moving appeals, the strongest warnings, the kindness that stoops to reason with people almost as an equal — men make all of it useless by their stubbornness, despising grace and practising evil. In the end, when God has used up every means of calling them to repentance, the judgment His patience had held back arrives.
Refusing a clear word does not leave a person where it found them. It pulls them downward, and the fall is deepest for those who claimed the most:
Unbelief is a steep, fast slide once the heart hardens itself against a direct warning from the Lord. And the greater the show of godliness beforehand, the deeper the fall.
The verse joins two failures: they would not listen, and they would not turn. Refusing a voice you once knew was God's does something to the conscience:
All truth speaks with an authority that honest people recognise. The more precious the truth, the sadder the results when someone refuses to act on it. To play with any truth is dangerous, and a hardened heart is the certain result. How many people carry a conscience paralysed at one point — if we can put it that way — because they refused something in which they once recognised the voice of God.
God asked for more than agreement. He asked them to "turn from their evil":
Where is repentance if the very thing He condemns carries on? To repent is to judge the evil as God does and leave it behind. We are to "cease to do evil" and "learn to do good."
The survivors had run to a place that could not save them:
Danger hung over them. Egypt would prove a useless shelter, and in the meantime it was all too sure a lure into idolatry.
His verdict on them is blunt:
Sadly, they had ears, but they did not hear. The remnant was rotten to the core.
- God spoke first. God sent messenger after messenger because He had compassion on His people. The warning was mercy before it was ever a threat.
- The ear decided. They did not listen or incline their ear. The problem was not missing light. It was stubbornness against grace.
- Turning was the test. Repentance is not regret about evil but departing from it — to cease doing evil and learn to do good.
- Refusal hardens. Playing with truth you once recognised deadens the conscience. The fall is steepest for those who claimed the most.
- Then judgment comes. When patience has used every means, the judgment it held back falls. Egypt, chosen as a shelter, proved only a lure into the same sin.
And my fury and mine anger was poured forth, and was kindled in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem; and they are become a waste, a desolation, as at this day.
God speaks to the Jews who had fled to Egypt, and He points first to the ruin behind them: Judah's towns and Jerusalem's streets lie empty because His anger fell there. So did God strike without warning, why does He retell the disaster, and why were the survivors already repeating the sin that caused it?
This verse looks back on something that had already happened. The people hearing it had watched it happen, and the closing words "as at this day" mean the ruin was still in front of them. One writer sets the fury of this verse against the long pleading that came first:
With their own eyes they had seen the destruction and desolation God brought on Judah and Jerusalem for their wickedness. He had begged them, "Oh, do not do this abominable thing that I hate." But they did not listen. So the judgment that waited long came at last with fury and anger.
Before the fire fell, God took pains to warn. What stands out in that record is the hardness of the people, not the severity of God:
Notice the hardness of the people's heart. They were stubborn in evil, and refused to bow the neck to God's testimony, despite all the pains God took, if we may put it that way, to warn them… The Lord had always set a full and lasting blessing before the people, if they repented; but they would not.
The people had burned incense to another god in those same streets. When Jeremiah confronted them, they defended that worship and blamed their hardship on having stopped it:
So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of what the Lord had done, or of the working of His hands, and it led to their own destruction. They read their troubles as the result of slighting the queen of heaven. Their will was set hard on a so-called religion that made sheer depravity and passion holy.
The same writer identifies the figure they were worshipping in those streets:
This was the female form of Baal or Bel. She was called Beltis, Ashtaroth, Astarte, Alitta, Mylitta, Aphrodite, and other names, and her worship involved the grossest immorality.
reason: "rehearses" is not plain English
Retelling a disaster can be cruelty, or it can be rescue. Here the aim was to reach the survivors before they repeated the sin in Egypt:
Did God take pleasure in recounting their sins, and His judgments as well as His warnings? No — it was His pity, and His desire that those in Egypt might listen at last… Danger was closing in on them. Egypt would be a useless shelter, but meanwhile it was a sure trap that drew them into idolatry.
The direction of their flight mattered. This group stands in sharp contrast to the exiles taken to Babylon:
These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and disease will consume them. Those at Babylon have a promise of peace, prosperity and plenty for a time… God redeemed the people out of Egypt at the beginning. But Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. So to return to Egypt was fatal, while from Babylon there was deliverance.
Everything turns on who is behind the desolation. The people traced their losses to an offended idol; Jeremiah traced them to God:
Why did they not put their troubles down to the chastening hand of God, which was the truth? That is exactly what the prophet presses home, with the simplicity and force of truth.
- Warned — God took pains to warn, and set full blessing before the people if they would repent. The fire in this verse falls only after that pleading has run out.
- Burned — The fury fell where the incense had risen: Judah's towns and Jerusalem's streets. The worship of the goddess they served there involved gross immorality.
- Recalled — In Egypt God names the ruin again. He does it not to shame the survivors but out of pity, so that this group might listen at last.
- Misread — They blamed their hardship on neglecting the queen of heaven, not on the chastening hand of God. So they gloried in the very thing that had destroyed them.
- Chosen — Direction decided the outcome. From Babylon there was deliverance; going back to Egypt against God's word was fatal.
And now thus saith Jehovah the God of hosts, the God of Israel Wherefore commit ye great evil against your souls, to cut off from you man and woman, infant and suckling, out of the midst of Judah, to leave you no remnant;
God is speaking to the survivors of Judah's collapse, who fled to Egypt against His word. There they took up the idolatry that ruined their homeland, and now He asks why they are destroying their own families.
They were not dragged to Egypt. They walked there, after God had told them what would happen.
The path of unbelief is a rapid descent when the heart hardens itself against a direct warning of the Lord. The greater the claim to godliness before, the deeper the fall... it was a fatal step when the prophet gave them the word of the Lord. That word assured them of safety in the land under Nebuchadnezzar, and of destruction in Egypt. Yet their impulse — indeed their determination — was to go there for shelter as a sensible precaution. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they desert Him for another, woe to them!
They picked Egypt as a hiding place. It failed them in two ways.
Danger was closing in on them. Egypt would be a useless shelter, but meanwhile it was all too sure a trap into idolatry.
God opens by asking why. He is not listing their crimes for the record.
Did God take pleasure in going over their sins, His judgments and His warnings? No — it was His pity, and His desire that those in Egypt might listen at last.
The wrong strikes at God, yet the ruin falls on them. They had watched this story play out once in Jerusalem, and were now repeating it.
Jeremiah reminds them in his message how God had dealt with Jerusalem and Judah because of their idolatries. He had even sent prophets to warn them. And now they were doing the same thing in Egypt. "You too are bringing utter ruin on yourselves and all your own."
The verse counts the cost household by household: man, woman, child, infant. Kelly points to the part the wives played in the idolatry.
Notice here that the prophet stresses the wickedness of wives, and the part it played in bringing on the disasters of Israel, both before and now. Women are more ready to hear and feel, for good or ill, than men... It is a great grace from the Lord when they receive the truth and are saved. It is an awful sign that judgment is near when they renounce the truth and are bold and shameless in their determination to serve a false god.
The ruin of Judah was not distant history to these people. They had watched it happen, and God set the lesson before them again.
They had seen with their own eyes how God destroyed Judah and Jerusalem and left them empty, because of their wickedness. He had pleaded with them: "Oh, do not do this abomination that I hate." They did not listen, so the judgment He held back for so long came at last with fury and anger. They must let that lesson teach them. They are not to provoke the Lord to wrath any more by their abominable idolatry, for if they did not listen they would be wiped out.
Later in the chapter they answer this appeal. They read their own disasters backwards, blaming the idol they had stopped serving.
So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of the works of the Lord or of the work of His hands, and it destroyed them. They blamed their troubles on neglecting the queen of heaven, because their will was set on a so-called religion that made depravity and passion sacred.
- Chosen — nobody forced Egypt on them. They picked it as shelter against a warning already given, and unbelief falls fast once a heart hardens against God's direct word.
- Trapped — the shelter protected nothing. It pulled them straight back into the idolatry that had already ruined Jerusalem.
- Self-harm — the sin is against God, but the ruin falls on them and on all they have.
- Whole households — man, woman, child and infant all count in the loss. The prophet names the wives' part in the idolatry as a sign that judgment was near.
- Pity — God's why is not a charge sheet but an appeal. He asks because He still wants them to listen, though they answered by boasting in their shame.
provoking me to anger with the works of your hands, burning incense unto other gods in the land of Egypt, whither ye are come to sojourn, that ye should be cut off, and that ye should be a curse and a reproach among all the nations of the earth?
After Jerusalem fell, Judah's survivors fled to Egypt against God's word and took up the worship of Egypt's gods. Now God asks them why, and His question points to where the harm lands: on themselves.
The people did not arrive at Egyptian idolatry in one leap. One commentator traces the slide to a warning they refused. He also names what God wants to be for His people:
Unbelief goes downhill fast when the heart hardens itself against a direct warning from the Lord. And the greater the show of godliness before, the deeper the fall. Going down into Egypt for safety was a fatal step. The prophet had given them the word of the Lord, assuring them of safety in the land under Nebuchadnezzar and of destruction in Egypt, where they were determined to go for shelter. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they desert Him for another, woe to them! It cannot but be to their shame, sorrow and ruin. Even when they have rebelled as far as they can go, God still sends them a message, in case any might yet hear and escape.
Other Jews were living as captives in Babylon at the same time. The two groups ended very differently:
This short history is especially interesting, because the story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to the story of the remnant in Babylon. These people go down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and disease will destroy them. Those at Babylon are promised peace, prosperity and plenty for the time being... At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt therefore was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
The phrase God uses here is not a general word for sin. It belongs to one thing:
"The works of their hands" is a phrase peculiar to heathen idolatry (Isa. 2:8; Jer. 1:16; 25:6-7, 14; Deut. 4:28; Ps. 115:4-7; 135:15).
Handmade gods are only the visible end of it. One writer traces the root further back. The same thing happens where no carved image is in sight:
The root of all idolatry is self-will, it is making a god of our own. It starts with self and shapes a god of our own — and it need not be made of silver, or made with our hands... There is a tool more cunning and skilful than the hands: the mind of man. Wherever self takes the place of the will of God, you will find the human mind at work, shaping a god to please itself. And it does this in the name of the Lord, in the name of the true God.
God lists their sins and asks them to explain themselves. He has a reason for both, and a warning about the country they had chosen:
Did God take pleasure in listing their sins, and His judgments as well as His warnings? No. It was His pity, and His desire that those in Egypt might listen at last... Danger hung right over them. Egypt would be a useless shelter, and meanwhile it was all too sure a lure into idolatry.
They went on with the idols, and God announced the outcome:
These wretched people start serving other gods again in the land of Egypt where they had fled. These words describe their state: "They have not humbled themselves even to this day, nor have they feared, nor walked in my law and my statutes that I set before you and before your fathers" (Jer. 44:10). So God declares that of all those who had gone down to Egypt, only a very small number would escape (v. 28). None of the rest would escape or survive or return to the land of Judah (Jer. 44:14).
- Descent. Harden your heart against one clear warning and the slide is fast. The louder the earlier show of godliness, the deeper the fall.
- Decoy. Egypt looked like shelter. It gave them no safety, and it lured them into idolatry.
- Self-will. The root of idolatry is not silver or stone. It is a will that shapes a god to suit itself, and the mind is a more cunning tool than the hands — it works even in God's name.
- Self-harm. They provoke God, but the loss is theirs. Their own act cuts them off and makes them a curse among the nations.
- Pity. God lists their sins and asks them why, not for pleasure, but so that they might still hear Him. He loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name.
Have ye forgotten the wickedness of your fathers, and the wickedness of the kings of Judah, and the wickedness of their wives, and your own wickedness, and the wickedness of your wives, which they have committed in the land of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem?
Jeremiah is speaking to Jewish refugees. They had fled to Egypt after Jerusalem fell, and there they took up idol worship. God asks whether the sins that ruined Judah have already slipped out of their memory. Behind the question lies a deeper issue: judgment teaches nothing to a heart that will not bow.
These Jews had settled in several Egyptian towns, and the move had not changed their habits.
The message is concerning all the Jews who were now dwelling in Egypt. Besides being in Tahpanhes, they were also in Noph (Memphis) and in Pathros, which was in upper Egypt... In his message Jeremiah reminds them how God dealt with Jerusalem and Judah because of their idol worship, though He had sent prophets to warn them. And now they were doing the same thing in Egypt.
The choice of Egypt was itself part of the tragedy. Babylon held another group of exiles, and their story ran the opposite way.
This short piece of history is especially interesting. The story of this remnant stands in complete contrast to the story of the remnant in Babylon. These people go down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, where sword, famine and disease will destroy them. Those in Babylon have a promise of peace, prosperity and plenty, for a time... At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt, but Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. So going back to Egypt was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
Such a list could look like a God who enjoys keeping accounts. The reason behind it is the opposite.
Did God take pleasure in recounting their sins, and His judgments as well as His warnings? No, it was His pity and desire that those in Egypt might at last listen... Danger hung right over them. Egypt would be a useless shelter, but meanwhile it was all too sure a trap into idol worship.
The question does not stop at the fathers and the kings. It reaches the kings' wives, the hearers themselves, and their own wives. Wives are named twice, and one writer explains why influence like theirs cuts both ways.
Notice here that the prophet lays stress on the wickedness of wives. It had its part in bringing on the disasters of Israel, both before and now. Women are more ready to hear and feel, for good or ill, than men... It is a great grace from the Lord when they receive the truth and are saved. It is an awful sign of speedy judgment when they renounce the truth and are bold and shameless in their resolve to serve a false god.
Knowing what God did to the last generation raises the standard for this one. The same writer makes the point with a family picture.
Suppose a child has grown up knowing his father's dishonour, and hearing of his disgrace and punishment. If the child had any right feeling, would that sin not be especially hateful in his eyes? The public example of his father's evil ways would always be before him. But suppose the son treated it lightly and used it as encouragement to walk in the same path. Is it not just that a still more severe punishment should fall on that son?
Forgetting here is not a failure of memory. The next verse gives the real diagnosis.
These wretched people begin again to serve other gods in the land of Egypt to which they had fled. These words describe their state: "They have not humbled themselves even to this day, nor have they feared, nor walked in My law and My statutes that I set before you and before your fathers" (Jer. 44:10).
A few verses later they answered Jeremiah. Their reply measured the past by their own comfort, not by God's word.
So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of the works of the Lord or the work of His hands, and it led to their own destruction. They read their troubles as the result of neglecting the queen of heaven, because they clung with all their will to a so-called religion that treated corruption and lust as sacred.
- Remembered — God lists the sins of fathers, kings, wives and hearers out of pity, not to settle scores. He wants them to listen at last.
- Repeated — In Egypt the refugees did what had already emptied Judah. A new country changed nothing, because the idol worship travelled with them.
- Wrong refuge — Babylon held a remnant with a promise of return. Egypt was the land God once redeemed them out of, and going back there was fatal.
- Accountable — Knowing a father's disgrace and then walking the same road makes the sin worse, not lighter. God is just to punish it more severely.
- Unhumbled — Forgetting is not weak memory but an unbroken will. They never humbled themselves, never feared, and blamed their losses on the idol they had dropped.
They are not humbled unto this day, neither have they feared, nor walked in my law, nor in my statutes which I set before you and before your fathers.
God's word reaches the Jews who fled to Egypt after Jerusalem fell. Verse 10 says the ruin they had watched taught them nothing.
They came to Egypt to save their lives. One writer traces what the move actually cost them.
They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. But there they fall under the sword. It would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there in submission to the king. In Egypt they give themselves up to idolatry, so that the wrath of God might come upon them to the end.
Egypt promised safety and delivered idolatry.
Verse 10 ends a long recital of sins — their fathers' and their own. Why go through the whole list?
Did God take pleasure in recounting their sins, and His judgments as well as His warnings? No, it was His pity and His desire that those in Egypt might at last listen… Imminent peril hung over them. Egypt would be a useless shelter. But meanwhile it was too sure a lure into idolatry.
God does not say they were unhappy. He says they had not humbled themselves. Older translations read "they are not humbled," which points to the humbling God does when a person will not do it himself. One writer sorts out the difference.
The invariable way of God is this: "Whoever humbles himself will be exalted." Faith alone gives self-humiliation. There are two forms of it. The happiest of all is to be humble. The next best thing is to be humbled… Humility is the effect of grace. Humbling belongs instead to God's righteous government, where we are not humble… Judgment must come instead of humbling. But in every case anything is better than to have our soul lifted up.
That is the exact position of the people in Egypt. Grace had not made them humble. Disaster had not humbled them. Only judgment was left.
They had watched a whole nation collapse, and the sight left them unchanged. One writer, describing a judgment where darkness falls, gives the reason.
Nor does the darkness produce repentance: "They gnawed their tongues in anguish and cursed the God of heaven for their pain and sores, and did not repent of their deeds." Such is the hardening character of sin. Such also is the powerlessness of judgment by itself to break the heart and subdue the soul to God.
Another writer finds the same thing in Israel's history. A person can study God's past dealings just to learn how to keep sinning with the least damage to himself, "without in the least being softened into true penitence" (Samuel Ridout).
The verse lists three failures: not humbled, not fearing, not walking in His law. A few verses later, those failures come out of their mouths.
The people, however, had become so hardened in their evil ways that they tell the prophet without hesitation, "We will not listen to you"! They inform him that they will continue their idolatry and burn incense to the queen of heaven. Their reason: when we did these things in Judah and Jerusalem we had plenty of bread, we were well, and saw no disaster. Jeremiah points out that this was the very thing which brought God's judgment on Judah and Jerusalem.
They even read their losses backwards. They blamed their troubles on having stopped the idol worship — "so they gloried in their shame, ignoring the works of the Lord and the work of His hands, to their own destruction" (William Kelly).
One writer carries the charge into the present day.
What defiance and wickedness, the fruit of their unbelieving hearts! Still greater is the defiance and wickedness of today, when people deliberately reject the cross and the gospel of Christ.
- Seen — They watched Jerusalem fall for this very sin. The sight taught them nothing. Judgment by itself has no power "to break the heart and subdue the soul to God."
- Pitied — God's long list of their sins was mercy, not spite: His desire was "that those in Egypt might at last listen."
- Unhumbled — The best thing is to be humble. The next best is to be humbled. Where neither happens, "judgment must come instead of humbling."
- Defiant — An unhumbled heart does not stay silent. It tells God's messenger, "We will not listen to you." It even blames its losses on leaving the idol.
- Today — Egypt was a useless shelter and a sure lure into idolatry. The defiance is greater still where people knowingly refuse the cross and the gospel.
Therefore thus saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel Behold, I will set my face against you for evil, and to cut off all Judah.
After Jerusalem fell, the last survivors of Judah ignored God's word and ran to Egypt, taking Jeremiah with them. There they went back to burning incense to other gods, and this verse is God's answer.
God had used these same words of Jerusalem itself:
How forceful is the assurance! Not only would the Lord give the inhabitants of Jerusalem to the fire as fuel, but He would "set His face against them." Think what that means to those who know His name, and know that He must hate evil! The Lord declares His settled opposition. As if that were not definite enough, He adds that they will go out from the fire, and the fire will devour them. There was no escape; for no real repentance followed, and God was not mocked.
They went to Egypt to be safe from the king of Babylon. It could not keep them safe, and it did something worse:
Great danger hung over them. Egypt would be a useless shelter, but in the meantime it was far too sure a lure into idolatry.
The deeper wrong was in whom they had left:
God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they abandon Him for another, it will go badly for them! It cannot help but end in their shame, sorrow and ruin. Even when they have rebelled to the very end, God still sends them a message, in case any might yet hear and escape.
The sentence does not open the chapter. It comes after long pleading:
If all this shows what man is in self-will and rebellion, it also shows what God is in patient grace and goodness (Jer. 44:4; 2 Peter 3:9). Grace follows them even into Egypt, and still pleads with them; but nothing humbles them or brings them to repentance (Jer. 44:5-10). But there is a limit to patience, and judgment follows from which there is no escape (Jer. 44:11-14). If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We get tired of strife and divisions and weakness, but going into the world does not improve matters. We see here the sad effect of going into the world; it left them without heart or conscience.
Another group of Jews had already been carried off to Babylon. Their story runs the opposite way:
This short history has a particular interest. The story of this remnant stands out in complete contrast to the one in Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, to be consumed by sword and famine and pestilence; those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt, but Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
The threat covers all Judah, not just a part. The state of the people explains why:
They had ears, but they did not hear. The remnant was rotten to the core.
Yet the chapter itself names an exception:
So God declares that of all those who had gone down to Egypt, except for "a very small company" that would escape (v. 28), "none of the remnant" should "escape or remain, so as to return into the land of Judah" (Jer. 44:14).
Judgment on a whole group never cancels what individuals do:
When the remnant as a whole fails, that does not release anyone from being faithful himself. Those whom the leaders carried away are not part of the group who settled in the land of Egypt; six or seven times these people are addressed as dwellers in Egypt, and for them there is no escape (Jer. 44:14). But there were faithful ones, and some are named. Ebed-melech helped to rescue the testimony from the mud (Jer. 38:7-12). Baruch helped to preserve the testimony of God (Jer. 36:4, 32). If a cup of cold water given to a disciple in faith and love cannot lose its reward, how could these faithful ones be forgotten? In a dark and evil day they helped the servant of the Lord, and so rescued and preserved the word and testimony of the Lord.
- Grace first. God pleaded with these people even after they reached Egypt. The sentence falls only when nothing humbles them.
- Then the limit. Patience has a boundary, and past it comes judgment from which there is no escape.
- Settled, not passing. "Set My face against" means fixed opposition. His name and His hatred of evil leave no other answer.
- The shelter was the snare. Egypt could not protect them, and it drew them into idolatry. Running to the world does not improve matters.
- Two roads. God promised the exiles in Babylon a way back; those who went to Egypt against His word had none. Even then He did not forget the faithful few, like Ebed-melech and Baruch.
And I will take the remnant of Judah, that have set their faces to enter into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, and they shall all be consumed in the land of Egypt shall they fall; they shall be consumed by the sword [and] by the famine, from the least even unto the greatest; they shall die by the sword and by the famine, and they shall be an execration, an astonishment, and a curse, and a reproach.
God had told them not to go. This verse sentences the people who went anyway, and who took the prophet Jeremiah with them. Why did the place they chose as a refuge become the place of ruin?
They went to Egypt to get out of Babylon's reach. One commentator traces how the plan doubled back on them.
Even at this last hour, this remnant could have submitted to the rule of Nebuchadnezzar. Then peace would have reigned in the land, and these few who remained would have owned it. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no idea of trusting in Jehovah. They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth. They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. But they only fall under the sword. That sword would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there under the king.
Another writer draws out the wider rule. Fighting God's word never cancels it.
If men resist, they gain nothing but grief and disappointment. Passing success only makes that bitterer. Far from stopping the word of Jehovah, they carry it out by the measures meant to get their own way. And the evils they dread most, they bring on themselves without fail.
Egypt did more than fail to protect them. It pulled them into idol worship.
Danger was hanging over them. Egypt would be a useless shelter, and all the while it was too sure a decoy into idolatry.
God did not begin here. This sentence comes last, after He had pleaded with them again and again.
If all this shows what man is in self-will and rebellion, it also shows what God is in patient grace and goodness. Grace follows them even into Egypt, and still pleads with them; but nothing humbles them or brings them to repentance. Yet there is a limit to patience, and judgment follows from which there is no escape. If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We see here the sad effect of going into the world; it left them without heart or conscience.
The verse reaches from the smallest to the greatest, and no one gets to go home. One writer holds that beside the one narrow exception God allows.
So God declares that of all those who had gone down to Egypt, "none of the remnant" should "escape or remain, so as to return into the land of Judah." The one exception is "a very small company" that would escape.
One writer compares this group with their fellow Jews in Babylon. The two roads end very differently.
The story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to that of the remnant at Babylon. These go down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and pestilence will consume them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, though he pronounces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon. There Daniel prevails in prayer with God for their deliverance and restoration. God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
Commentators read Egypt here as a picture of the world — the place God had once brought His people out of. One writer puts it bluntly: "Those who choose the world will be involved in its judgment" (The Bible Treasury).
- Flight — They ran from Nebuchadnezzar's sword and met it in Egypt. Their own plan handed them the very thing they feared.
- Face — They set their faces toward Egypt. They even asked Jeremiah what God said, and then refused to obey it.
- Decoy — Egypt gave them no protection. What it gave them was idols.
- Reach — Grace followed them all the way into Egypt and pleaded there. Then judgment came, from least to greatest, and spared no one.
- Road — From Babylon there was deliverance. From Egypt, almost none. A punishment you accept can end in restoration. A refuge you choose against God's word may not.
And I will punish them that dwell in the land of Egypt as I have punished Jerusalem, by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence;
The Jews who survived Jerusalem's fall ran to Egypt for safety, but God now tells them the same blows will reach them there. Can anyone outrun the results of turning away from God?
The flight to Egypt was not forced on them. God had told them to stay in the land under the Babylonian king. They preferred their own plan.
The prophet announced what would fall upon the Jews who tried to escape by going down into Egypt. He showed them that in Egypt they would only run into more trouble from Nebuchadnezzar. If they had stayed quietly in the land, under the Babylonian king whom God had placed over them, they would have been kept safe. But they, choosing human policy, thought it was safer to go down into Egypt, whereas it proved to be the opposite. Nebuchadnezzar pursued the Egyptians and punished these unbelieving Jews in that land.
Egypt failed them twice over. It gave them no protection. Instead it pulled them deeper into idolatry.
Danger hung over them. Egypt would be a useless shelter, and in the meantime it was all too surely a trap that drew them into idolatry.
Commentators carry the same lesson over to the Christian who leans on the world.
This reliance upon Egypt was especially offensive to God. He had delivered them from that very people by His judgments at the start of their national history. It is just as offensive to God when a Christian goes back to the world-system, after He has delivered him from it and from its coming judgment. Such a Christian relies on the world's power or its wisdom, instead of finding his resource in God as emergencies arise. Egypt had its pleasures and its treasures, which Moses turned away from, and they picture the things that are not for the believer.
These people had watched Judah fall. Nothing in this sentence could surprise them.
They had seen with their own eyes the destruction and desolation which God had brought upon Judah and Jerusalem because of their wickedness. He had pleaded earnestly with them, saying, "Oh, do not do this abominable thing that I hate!" But they did not listen, so the judgment which lingered long came at last with fury and anger. They are told to let that lesson teach them not to provoke the Lord to wrath any more by their abominable idolatry. If they did not heed it, the Lord would consume them completely.
The people blamed their troubles on the wrong cause. Jeremiah pointed them to the real one.
Why did they not attribute their troubles, as was the truth, to the chastening hand of God? This is precisely what the prophet charges home with the simplicity and force of truth.
Another group of Jews had been taken to Babylon. The two groups ended in opposite places.
There is a special interest in this short history. The story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to the story of the remnant at Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, to be consumed by sword and famine and pestilence. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for a time. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, though he pronounces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon, where Daniel prevails in prayer with God for their deliverance and restoration. God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt therefore was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
The chapter does not close with the door shut. A few would still come back out of Egypt. God had not lost sight of those dragged along by the stubborn majority.
In the middle of wrath — righteous wrath — He still remembers mercy. How comforting it is to hear Him say even at such a time, "Yet a small number who escape the sword will return out of the land of Egypt into the land of Judah." The blessed Lord knows the godly, and He knows how to deliver them. Some, doubtless, like the prophet and Baruch, had been carried into Egypt by the proud and wilful. They were few and feeble. They were not there gladly; circumstances had swept them along.
- Escape chosen — God told them to stay in the land under Babylon. They chose human policy and went down to Egypt.
- Escape trapped — Egypt sheltered nobody. It was a useless refuge and at the same time a decoy that pulled them into idol worship.
- Escape overtaken — The same sword, famine and pestilence that struck Jerusalem found them in Egypt. Distance changed nothing.
- Escape contrasted — God promised the exiles in Babylon peace and a way home. Those who ran back to Egypt had no way out.
- Escape granted — Even here God remembers mercy. A small number would return, for the Lord knows the godly and knows how to deliver them.
and none of the remnant of Judah, that have come into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, shall escape or remain, so as to return into the land of Judah, whither they have a desire to return to dwell there; for none shall return but such as shall escape.
Jeremiah is now in Egypt. The survivors of Judah fled there after Jerusalem fell, and they took him with them against his warning. Here God shuts the door behind them. The land they still long for will not take them back, and only a few will ever escape.
God had already told them where safety lay. They went the other way.
The path of unbelief drops fast when the heart hardens itself against a direct warning of the Lord. The more someone claimed to be godly before, the deeper the fall... it was a fatal step when the prophet gave them the word of the Lord. He assured them of safety in the land under Nebuchadnezzar, and of destruction in Egypt. Yet their impulse — indeed their determination — was to go there for shelter. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they desert Him for another, woe to them!
The danger they ran from would never have touched them at home.
If at this last hour this remnant had submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar, peace would have reigned in the land. These few who remained would have held it... They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. But in Egypt they fall under the sword instead. That sword would have spared them in Judea, had they stayed there in subjection to the king.
The verse allows that they still want the land of Judah. Wanting was never their problem. Jeremiah knew why they would not listen.
Jeremiah is not ignorant of the reason. He says, "You dissembled in your hearts." A better translation is, "You deceived yourselves in your own souls" (v. 20). The self-will that was determined to take a certain course deceived them. Nothing will warp the understanding and block the grasp of truth like self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see.
(That wording comes from an older translation of Jeremiah 42:20.)
Judah's survivors ended up in two foreign lands. Each land led to a different end.
The story of this remnant stands out as a complete contrast to that of the remnant in Babylon. These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and pestilence will consume them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being... God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt, therefore, was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
The judgment is sweeping, but not total. God leaves a small opening on purpose.
In the middle of wrath — righteous wrath — He remembers mercy. How comforting to hear Him say even at such a time: "those who escape the sword shall return from the land of Egypt to the land of Judah, few in number" (v. 28). The blessed Lord knows the godly, and knows, too, how to deliver them. Some, no doubt, like the prophet and Baruch, had been carried into Egypt by the proud and wilful. They were few and feeble. They were not there with a happy mind.
The wording of the chapter marks off who is shut out.
Those who were carried away by the leaders do not form part of the group who dwelt in the land of Egypt. Six or seven times these are addressed as dwellers in Egypt; for such there is no escape (v. 14).
The chapter also shows what moving to a new place cannot fix.
If all this shows what man is in self-will and rebellion, it also shows what God is in patient grace and goodness... Grace follows them even into Egypt and still pleads with them. But nothing humbles them or brings them to repentance... If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We get tired of strife and divisions and weakness, but going into the world does not mend matters. We see here the sad effect of going into the world: it left them without heart or conscience.
- Refused — They had a clear word promising safety where they stood. Hardening the heart against a direct warning is what began the descent.
- Fled — They chose Egypt as shelter from Nebuchadnezzar. There they met the very sword that would have spared them in Judah.
- Fatal — Babylon's exiles had a promise of return; Egypt's had none. God once redeemed His people out of Egypt, so going back there was ruin.
- Wanted — They still desired the land. Desire without obedience saves no one; self-will refuses to see what it does not wish to see.
- Few — God remembers mercy inside His wrath. A small number, carried there against their will, would return, because He knows the godly and knows how to deliver them.
Then all the men who knew that their wives burned incense to other gods, and all the women who stood by, a great assemblage, even all the people that dwelt in the land of Egypt, in Pathros, answered Jeremiah, saying,
The scene is Egypt. A group of Judeans had fled there for safety after Jerusalem fell. Jeremiah has just warned them that their worship of other gods will destroy them. In verse 15 the crowd answers him back — husbands, wives, and a whole settlement of exiles, speaking with one voice.
Their presence in Egypt was already an act of defiance. The prophet had told them where safety lay, and they went south anyway.
Unbelief goes downhill fast once the heart hardens itself against a direct warning of the Lord. And the greater the profession of piety before, the deeper the fall. Going down into Egypt for safety was not natural in those who had always been reluctant to bow to Babylon... But it was a fatal step. The prophet gave them the word of the Lord. He assured them of safety in the land under Nebuchadnezzar, and of destruction in Egypt. Egypt was exactly where their impulse — their determination — drove them to go for shelter. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name. If they desert Him for another, woe to them! Even when they have revolted as far as they can go, God still sends them a message, in case any might yet hear and escape.
The verse places this crowd in Pathros. Writers differ over how far that name reaches.
From Isaiah 11:11, Pathros, as distinct from Egypt, would seem to be the upper part of the land... The chief difficulty is that Jeremiah links Pathros (44:1) with cities in Lower Egypt, and speaks of it more generally later on (v. 15). But nothing in that grouping is decisive enough to set aside our referring Pathros to the land farther south.
The verse is careful to say the husbands knew. That one word spreads the blame.
The women seem to have had most to do with this, but they did so with the knowledge and the consent of their husbands.
One writer sees a pattern here that runs wider than this one crowd.
The prophet lays stress on the wickedness of wives, and the place it had in bringing on the disasters of Israel before and now. Women are more ready to hear and feel, for good or ill, than men... It is a great grace from the Lord when they receive the truth and are saved. It is an awful sign of judgment close at hand when they renounce the truth and turn bold and shameless in their resolve to serve a false god.
A whole community refuses God's word with one voice. One writer traces where that kind of corruption starts.
It is painful but profitable to trace the progress of religious corruption. It arises not from outside, but from within. No outward temptation, it seems, could have brought the people of Judah to rebel with so bold a face. Corrupt prophets and a corrupt priesthood did that. They still kept the ordinances God had given, but held them as forms that human wisdom had put in place of His power. That blindness is what made the people answer Jeremiah as they did.
Their refusal had a cause, and one writer names it.
The self-will that was determined to take a certain course deceived them. Nothing will so warp the understanding and hinder the grasp of truth as self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see. And, as always, behind the self-will there was pride that would not admit they were wrong.
They had run to Egypt to get away from trouble. Their answer to Jeremiah shows what the move cost them.
If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We get tired of strife and divisions and weakness, but going into the world does not mend matters. We see here the sad effect of going into the world: it left them without heart or conscience. It would be hard to find a bolder, more shameless and wicked defiance of God and His word.
- Descent. Refusing a direct warning starts a fast slide. The higher the earlier profession of piety, the deeper the fall.
- Escape. They fled to Egypt to avoid trouble, and the flight itself left them without heart or conscience.
- Complicity. The wives made the offerings, but the husbands knew and agreed. The sin belonged to whole households.
- Blindness. Self-will warps the understanding. It will not see what it does not want to see, and pride will not admit it was wrong.
- Inside job. The corruption did not come from Egypt around them. It came from within. That is how a great crowd could refuse God's word together with such a bold face.
[As for] the word that thou hast spoken unto us in the name of Jehovah, we will not hearken unto thee,
The men and women of Judah had fled to Egypt after Jerusalem fell. Now they stand before Jeremiah in a crowd and refuse the message he brings in the name of the Lord. How does a people that has just watched God's judgment fall on its own city come to say such a thing out loud?
This is not quiet drifting. They announce the decision to the prophet's face. One writer shows how hard they had grown before they could say it:
The people, however, had become so hardened in their evil ways that they tell the prophet without hesitation, "We will not listen to you"! They boldly inform him that they will keep up their idolatry and burn incense to the queen of heaven. When we did these things in Judah and Jerusalem, they say, we had plenty of bread and were well, and saw no evil.
They do not argue that Jeremiah misheard God. They prefer their own plan. One writer names what is working underneath the refusal:
The self-will that was determined to take a certain course deceived them. Nothing twists the understanding and blocks the grasp of truth like self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see. And, as always, behind the self-will there was pride that would not admit they were wrong.
This was no harmless local custom. The title they use belonged to a goddess worshipped by the nations around them:
They had provoked Him by making cakes to the queen of heaven. They had fallen in with the worship of a female idol. That worship was common among the idolatrous nations around them: the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. They called the Babylonian Venus, Ishtar, the queen of heaven... The Phoenicians worshipped this "queen of heaven" under the name of Ashtoreth or Astarte. All kinds of immoral ceremonies went with this wicked worship, and the Jews had taken it up. The women made cakes to present to this goddess.
Their defence rests on memory: life was comfortable while the incense burned. They then read the reverse into their recent losses.
So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of the works of the Lord or the work of His hands, and it destroyed them. They read their troubles as the result of neglecting the queen of heaven. They had handed their will over completely to a so-called religion that made mere depravity and passion sacred.
Jeremiah points them to the cause they left out:
Why did they not put their troubles down to the chastening hand of God, which was the truth? This is exactly what the prophet presses home with the simplicity and force of truth.
They had asked Jeremiah for a word from God, then refused it. Egypt looked like the safe choice:
They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth. They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. But there they fall under the sword that would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there in submission to the king. In Egypt they give themselves up to idolatry, so that the wrath of God might come on them to the end.
One writer carries the same refusal into the present:
What defiance and wickedness, the fruit of their unbelieving hearts! The defiance and wickedness of today is even greater, when people deliberately reject the cross and the gospel of Christ.
- The word. God speaks through Jeremiah. The crowd tells him to his face that they will not listen.
- The will. Behind the refusal is self-will backed by pride, which will not see what it does not want to see.
- The idol. The "queen of heaven" was a real cult — Ishtar, Ashtoreth, Astarte — with immoral rites the people had taken up.
- The excuse. They credited the incense for their good years and blamed its loss for the bad ones. They never traced their troubles to God's hand.
- The end. The Egypt they picked for safety became the place of the sword. Refusing the word of the Lord never removes the judgment it announces.
but we will certainly do every word that is gone forth out of our mouth, to burn incense to the queen of the heavens, and to pour out drink-offerings to her, as we have done, we and our fathers, our kings and our princes, in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem; and we had plenty of bread, and were well, and saw no evil.
The survivors of Judah have fled to Egypt against the word of the Lord, and there they answer Jeremiah to his face. Their reply raises two questions: who was this "queen of heaven," and why did they think she paid better than the Lord?
Their words are not a debate but a refusal. One writer weighs what such an answer shows about man, and about God.
If all this shows what man is in self-will and rebellion, it shows also what God is in patient grace and goodness. Grace follows them even into Egypt, and still pleads with them; but nothing humbles them or brings them to repentance. But there is a limit to patience, and judgment follows from which there is no escape... It would be hard to find a bolder, more impudent and wicked defiance of God and His word. They, moreover, impudently claim that it is better and more profitable to serve idols than to serve the Lord!
The title belonged to a female idol. The nations around Judah all knew her.
They had taken up the worship of a female idol. It was common among the idol-worshipping nations around them: the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. They called the Babylonian Venus, Ishtar, the queen of heaven. The Assyrians called her Beltis, the female form of Baal. In the sculpture they placed a star over her head and called her "the mistress of the heavens." The Phoenicians worshipped this "queen of heaven" under the name of Ashtoreth or Astarte. The Jews had taken up this wicked worship, and all kinds of immoral ceremonies went with it.
Their case rests on memory: the years of incense were the years of plenty. They read their comfort as proof that the idol worked.
So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of the works of the Lord or of the working of His hands, and it led to their own destruction. They explained their troubles as the result of slighting the queen of heaven. Their will was fully set on a so-called religion that treated sheer corruption and lust as sacred.
One writer presses the question they never asked.
Why did they not attribute their troubles, as was the truth, to the chastening hand of God? This is exactly what the prophet charges home with the simplicity and force of truth.
Incense and drink offerings were not invented for the idol. They already had a meaning, and the people gave it away.
Incense spoke of the merits of Christ. Drink-offerings spoke of the joy found in the life and death of the Lord Jesus. Yet by the incense they burned to idols and the wine they poured out, the people declared by their action that they had learned the merits belonging to false gods. They declared they had found joy in a rite that was, little as they knew it, really the worship of demons. What an insult it was to God, and to Him whom the sacrifice represented, for Israel to give drink-offerings to idols!
They bind themselves to whatever they have vowed. One writer names what lies under that.
The root of all idolatry is self-will, it is making a god of our own. It is starting with self and fashioning a god, not necessarily out of silver, nor necessarily with our hands... wherever self takes the place of the will of God, you will find the human mind at work, fashioning a god to please itself. And it does this in the name of the Lord, in the name of the true God.
One writer sets this group beside the captives in Babylon. The place they chose decided the outcome.
These people go down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and disease will destroy them. Those at Babylon have peace, prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being... God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt, but Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt therefore was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance... Egypt stands for the place that was ours by nature, under Satan's power.
- Vow. They make their own vow the rule — "everything that we have vowed." That self-will is the root of all idolatry: fashioning a god to please yourself.
- Idol. The "queen of heaven" was a female idol known to Babylon, Assyria, Phoenicia and Egypt. Immoral rites went with her worship.
- Evidence. They argued from full stomachs and quiet years. They credited the idol for what God's hand had given, and blamed their losses on neglecting her.
- Insult. Incense and drink offerings were God's own signs of the worth and joy found in Christ. Given to an idol, they became the worship of demons.
- End. Grace followed them into Egypt and still pleaded, but nothing humbled them. From Babylon there was deliverance; from Egypt there was none.
But since we left off burning incense to the queen of the heavens, and pouring out drink-offerings to her, we have wanted everything, and have been consumed by the sword and by the famine.
The people in Egypt have just refused to listen to Jeremiah. Here is their reason: since they stopped honouring the "queen of heaven," everything has gone wrong.
The worship named in this verse was not a Jewish invention. Israel took it from the nations around them, and the goddess went by many names.
They had taken up the worship of a female idol. This worship was common among the idol-worshipping nations around them: the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. The Babylonians called their Venus, Ishtar, the queen of heaven. The Assyrians called her Beltis, the female form of Baal. In their sculpture they placed a star over her head and called her "the mistress of the heavens." The Phoenicians worshipped this "queen of heaven" under the name of Ashtoreth or Astarte. The Jews had adopted this wicked worship, which involved all kinds of immoral ceremonies. The women made cakes to present to this goddess. Jewish tradition tells us that each cake carried a stamped image of the idol.
Where the ESV says "making offerings," older translations read "burning incense." Neither act was a random gesture; each carried a meaning in Israel's worship.
Incense spoke of the merits of Christ. Drink offerings spoke of the joy found in the life and death of the Lord Jesus. Yet the people burned incense to idols and poured out wine to them. By that action they claimed to have learned the merits belonging to false gods, and to have found joy in a rite which was really the worship of demons, little as they knew it (1 Cor. 10:20).
after_note: keeps every clause of the original What an insult to God it was for Israel to give drink offerings to idols — an insult to Him whom the sacrifice represented!
They had lived through famine and the sword. They knew what had happened, but they drew the opposite conclusion from it.
So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of the works of Jehovah or of the work of His hands, and it led to their own destruction. They read their troubles as the result of slighting the queen of heaven, because their will was fully set on a so-called religion. That religion made plain depravity and passion sacred. Why did they not trace their troubles, as was the truth, to the chastening hand of God? That is exactly what the prophet presses home with the simplicity and force of truth.
Pushed to its end, the argument becomes a public comparison in which God loses:
It would be hard to find a bolder, more shameless or more wicked defiance of God and His word. They even claim that it is better and more profitable to serve idols than to serve the Lord! (Jer. 44:15-19) … If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We get tired of strife and divisions and weakness, but going into the world does not mend matters. We see here the sad effect of going into the world; it left them without heart or conscience.
The wish behind their reasoning is not unique to Egypt.
This is only a common deception which souls in every age practise on themselves. These poor Israelites wanted every one to turn to his own ways and to have the blessing of God at the same time. They wanted to please themselves and yet be surrounded with the signs of God's favour. (Compare Jer. 44.) They had not learned, as so many of us have not, the truth: "For the Lord disciplines the one He loves, and chastises every son whom He receives."
Their claim was about the future as much as the past: idolatry pays. God answers in the verses that follow.
The answer is plain enough, and they heard what their fate would be for their deliberate unbelief and disobedience. These are solemn words. The Lord said, "They shall know whose word shall stand, Mine or theirs." God's Word will always stand. So will those who stand by the Word of God and put their trust in it.
- Borrowed goddess. The "queen of heaven" came from the nations around Israel: Ishtar, Beltis, Ashtoreth. Her worship involved immoral ceremonies, and the women baked cakes for her.
- Stolen signs. Incense and drink offerings belonged to God and spoke of Christ. Offered to an idol, they became the worship of demons and a direct insult to Him.
- Twisted history. They read their famine as punishment for giving up idolatry, and so gloried in their shame. The true cause was the chastening hand of God.
- Old deception. Every age repeats the same self-deception: keep your own ways and God's blessing at once. They never learned that the Lord disciplines the one He loves.
- God's word stands. God answers every claim: "whose word shall stand, Mine or theirs." Those who stand on His word stand with it.
And when we burned incense to the queen of the heavens and poured out drink-offerings to her, did we make for her cakes to portray her, and pour out drink-offerings to her, without our husbands?
The women of Judah, now living in Egypt, answer the prophet by pointing at their husbands: the men knew about the cakes and the drink offerings. Their answer raises two questions — who this "queen of heaven" was, and how far the guilt really spread.
This goddess was not a local invention. The nations around Judah worshipped her under many names.
They had joined in the worship of a female idol. This worship was widespread among the idol-worshipping nations around them — the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. They called the Babylonian Venus, Ishtar, the queen of heaven. The Assyrians called her Beltis, the female form of Baal. In their sculptures they set a star over her head and called her "the mistress of the heavens." The Phoenicians worshipped this "queen of heaven" under the name of Ashtoreth or Astarte. The Jews had taken up this wicked worship, and all kinds of immoral ceremonies went with it. The women made cakes to present to this goddess. Jewish tradition tells us that they stamped the image of the idol on each cake.
Writers do not all point to the same object in the sky:
Jeremiah also says that in Judah and Jerusalem people made cakes to the queen of heaven — a title most take to mean the moon, worshipped as Astarte.
The women's question is not a denial. It is an appeal to a household that acted as one.
The women seem to have been the main ones involved in this, but they did it with the knowledge and the consent of their husbands.
One writer weighs why the prophet puts the wives at the front of this charge.
Notice here that the prophet stresses the wickedness of the wives, and the part it played in bringing on the disasters of Israel, both before and now. Women are quicker to hear and to feel, for good or ill, than men. We see the brighter side in the Acts of the Apostles, and also in the Gospels and Letters of the New Testament. The darker side appears here, as in other places. It is a great grace from the Lord when they receive the truth and are saved. It is an awful sign that judgment is near when they turn from the truth and are bold and shameless in their determination to serve a false god.
They are not embarrassed. They describe the worship openly, as something to be proud of.
So they gloried in their shame. They paid no attention to the works of Jehovah or to the work of His hands, and so they destroyed themselves. They read their disasters as the result of neglecting the queen of heaven, because their will was fully set on a so-called religion that made mere depravity and passion sacred.
There was a true reason for their troubles, and they missed it.
Why did they not put their troubles down to the chastening hand of God, which was the truth? This is exactly what the prophet presses home, with the simplicity and force of truth.
Such bold defiance of a prophet did not come from pressure outside the nation.
It is painful but useful to trace how religious corruption grows. It does not come from outside, but from inside. It seems that no outward temptation could have made the people of Judah rebel so boldly. Corrupt prophets and a corrupt priesthood did. They held on to certain ordinances of God, but not in the power of God — only in the form which human wisdom had put in their place. That blinding power made the people reply, "we will not listen to you."
The refusal was not the end of the conversation. God answered it.
They boldly inform him they will continue their idolatry and burn incense to the queen of heaven, for say they, when we did these things in Judah and Jerusalem we had plenty of bread and were well, and saw no evil (vv. 15-19). Jeremiah points out to them it was the very thing which brought God's judgment upon Judah and Jerusalem (vv. 20-23).
- Inside the nation. The collapse came from within, not from outside pressure. Corrupt prophets and priests kept God's ordinances in form, without His power.
- Inside the home. The wives led, but the husbands knew and agreed. The guilt covered the whole household.
- Inside the will. No one talked them into it. Their will was set on a religion that made depravity and passion sacred.
- Inside-out history. They blamed their losses on neglecting the goddess. The real cause was the chastening hand of God.
- The verdict. Jeremiah named this very worship as the cause. It had already brought God's judgment on Judah and Jerusalem.
And Jeremiah said unto all the people, to the men, and to the women, and to all the people that had given him that answer, saying,
The people had just refused to listen, vowing to keep burning incense to the queen of heaven. Jeremiah answered the whole crowd, men and women, and named the real cause of their ruin.
Verse 20 is a response, so it only makes sense against what the people had just said. They had read their own history backwards. They thought Judah fell because they had neglected their goddess, not because they had served her.
So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of the works of the Lord or the work of His hands, and it led to their own destruction. They blamed their troubles on slighting the queen of heaven, because they had handed their will completely over to a so-called religion. That religion made mere depravity and passion sacred.
Such open defiance did not come from pressure outside the nation. Its source was closer to home.
It is painful but useful to trace how religious corruption grows. It does not come from outside, but from within. It seems no outward temptation could have made the people of Judah rebel so openly. But corrupt prophets and a corrupt priesthood did just that.
The title the people kept using was not a Jewish one. It belonged to a female idol worshipped in the nations around them.
They had taken up the worship of a female idol. This worship was common among the idol-worshipping nations around them: the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. The Babylonians called their Venus, Ishtar, the queen of heaven. The Assyrians called her Beltis, the female form of Baal. In their sculpture they placed a star over her head and called her "the mistress of the heavens." The Phoenicians worshipped this "queen of heaven" under the name Ashtoreth or Astarte. The women made cakes to present to this goddess.
The wrong object of worship was not the only problem.
This was the female form of Baal or Bel. Her names included Beltis, Ashtaroth, Astarte, Alitta, Mylitta and Aphrodite. Her worship involved the grossest immorality.
Jeremiah does not argue about their goddess. He points them to the hand behind their troubles.
Why did they not credit their troubles, as was the truth, to the chastening hand of God?
Another writer sets the same exchange side by side — their claim, then his correction:
They tell him openly that they will continue their idolatry and burn incense to the queen of heaven. Why? Because, they say, when we did these things in Judah and Jerusalem we had plenty of bread, we were well, and we saw no trouble (vv. 15-19). Jeremiah points out that this was the very thing which brought God's judgment on Judah and Jerusalem (vv. 20-23).
Their whole case rested on remembered comfort: things went well while we did this. Commentators warn that outward conditions prove nothing, in either direction.
Outward troubles do not prove that a man is in the wrong place. Outward persecution rather tends to prove that he is in the right place (2 Timothy 3:12). And outward success is not a necessary proof of God's approval. This is a very basic lesson, yet it needs saying again and again. We have such a strong tendency to judge in that crude and childish way. So we are likely to accept the verdict of Job's comforters when we judge other people's lives. Such tests can also mislead us about our own course.
Jeremiah's reply does not stop at correcting their history. It ends with a test.
The answer is plain enough. They heard what their fate would be for their deliberate unbelief and disobedience. These are solemn words. The Lord said, "They shall know whose word will stand, Mine or theirs." God's word will always stand. So will those who stand by the word of God and put their trust in it.
- Answer — Verse 20 is Jeremiah's reply to a crowd that had just refused him. He speaks to men and women together, because the whole company had answered him.
- Inside — That bold refusal did not come from outside pressure. Corrupt prophets and priests bred it inside the nation.
- Idol — The queen of heaven was a borrowed foreign goddess. The women baked cakes for her, and her worship carried gross immorality with it.
- Cause — They claimed the incense brought them good days. Jeremiah answers that this same incense brought God's judgment on Judah and Jerusalem.
- Standing — Comfort is no proof of God's approval. The whole dispute ends on one line: they will learn whose word stands, God's or theirs.
Is it not the incense that ye burned in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem, ye and your fathers, your kings and your princes and the people of the land, that Jehovah remembered, and that came into his mind?
The last survivors of Judah have taken Jeremiah with them into Egypt, and there they refuse to stop burning incense to the queen of heaven. His reply asks one question: did God forget the offerings they and their kings once made in Judah?
The people looked everywhere but one place for the cause of their troubles. Jeremiah's question puts that cause in front of them.
Why did they not attribute their troubles, as was the truth, to the chastening hand of God? This is exactly what the prophet presses home with the simplicity and force of truth.
Their explanation of their suffering left God out. It made the disaster itself an argument for the idol.
So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of the works of the Lord or the working of His hands, to their own destruction. They blamed their disasters on slighting the queen of heaven. Their will was set on a so-called religion which made mere depravity and passion sacred.
Older translations read "the incense that you burned" where the ESV has "the offerings that you offered." Either way, this was one particular worship, borrowed from the nations around Judah.
They had provoked Him by making cakes to the queen of heaven. They had taken up the worship of a female idol. That worship was common among the idol-worshipping nations around them: the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. The Babylonians called their Venus, Ishtar, the queen of heaven... The Phoenicians worshipped this "queen of heaven" under the name of Ashtoreth or Astarte. The Jews had taken up this wicked worship, and all kinds of immoral ceremonies went with it. The women made cakes to present to this goddess.
Commentators differ on which heavenly body the title points to.
Jeremiah also says that in Judah and Jerusalem people made cakes to the QUEEN OF HEAVEN. Many take this to mean the moon, worshipped as Astarte.
Jeremiah's charge names kings, officials, fathers and the people alike. One writer pauses on the wives, and on what their zeal for a false god signals.
Notice that the prophet stresses the wickedness of wives, and the part it played in bringing on the disasters of Israel, both before and now. Women are more ready to hear and feel, for good or ill, than men... It is a great grace from the Lord when they receive the truth and are saved. When they renounce the truth and are bold and shameless in their resolve to serve a false god, it is an awful sign that judgment is near.
These people had fled to Egypt for safety. Another group of survivors had been carried off to Babylon, and the two ended very differently.
These go down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and plague will consume them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for a time. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, though he pronounces their doom... At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt therefore was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
They had made their choice in open defiance. Jeremiah tells them what it will cost.
The answer is plain enough. They heard what their fate would be for their deliberate unbelief and disobedience. These are solemn words. The Lord said, "They shall know whose word will stand, Mine or theirs." God's Word will always stand, and so will everyone who stands by the Word of God and trusts in it.
- Remembered — God never overlooked what they burned in Judah's cities and Jerusalem's streets. Jeremiah's question takes that for granted.
- Misread — They credited the idol for their good years and blamed its neglect for their ruin. The real cause was the chastening hand of God.
- Shared — Kings, officials, fathers, people and wives all stood charged. The guilt ran through every rank, and bold false worship signalled judgment near.
- Chosen — They chose Egypt over the word of the Lord, and Egypt proved fatal. The remnant in Babylon had deliverance promised.
- Settled — The issue closes with whose word will stand; God's Word stands, and so do those who trust it.
And Jehovah could no longer bear, because of the evil of your doings, [and] because of the abominations that ye had committed; and your land is become a waste, and an astonishment, and a curse, without inhabitant, as at this day.
The Jewish refugees in Egypt had just told Jeremiah that their troubles began when they stopped burning incense to the queen of heaven. He turns their history right side up: that incense is the reason their land now lies empty.
The refugees had the same facts as Jeremiah and drew the opposite conclusion. One writer shows where their conclusion came from:
So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of the works of the Lord or the work of His hands, to their own destruction. They blamed their troubles on slighting the queen of heaven. That was because their will was fully set on a so-called religion — one that made mere depravity and passion sacred.
This verse makes the opposite claim. The desolation is God's answer to their conduct. The same writer puts Jeremiah's counter-question in one line:
Why did they not trace their troubles to God's chastening hand, which was the truth? This is exactly what the prophet drives home with the simplicity and force of truth.
The opening words mark the end of long restraint, not a flash of anger. One writer shows what God did the moment that restraint ended:
While God still tolerated the people of Israel and the house of David, He let no other power become supreme among the nations... The time came when God could no longer bear with the evil ways of the chosen nation. Then He Himself raised up Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon. He strengthened him to subdue first Assyria and then Egypt. All the smaller neighbouring kingdoms fell an easy prey to his armies.
"A curse" here means more than a wrecked economy. An empty land puts a question in the mouths of outsiders — and answers it:
With such curses coming on Israel, their children and foreigners too would be shocked. They would see the whole land given over to sulphur, salt and burning, with no seed sown and no grass growing. It was a reminder of the terrible overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah. The nations would ask why the Lord had caused such devastation in the land of Israel. They would be told, "Because they have forsaken the covenant of the Lord God of their fathers, which He made with them when He brought them out of the land of Egypt."
Another writer traces the same cause behind all of Israel's sorrows:
Their cities are now without inhabitants. The land is completely desolate, and the Lord has removed her children far away... one reason and one only can be given for their sorrows in every period.
These people had run from the wreckage instead of facing what caused it. One writer puts the warning plainly for anyone tempted by the same move:
There is a limit to patience, and judgment follows from which there is no escape. If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We get tired of strife and divisions and weakness, but going into the world does not mend matters. We see here the sad effect of going into the world: it left them without heart or conscience.
Even a chapter this dark does not close with everyone consumed. Another writer points to the promise God keeps for His own:
In the midst of wrath — righteous wrath — He remembers mercy. How comforting it is to hear Him say even at such a time, "And those who escape the sword shall return from the land of Egypt to the land of Judah, few in number." The blessed Lord knows the godly, and knows too how to deliver them. Some, no doubt, like the prophet and Baruch, had been carried into Egypt by the proud and wilful. They were few and feeble. They were not there with a happy mind.
- Patience. God bore with the nation for generations. The desolation dates from the moment He could bear it no longer, not from the first offence.
- Cause. The incense they defended was the very thing that emptied their land. They read their history backwards and blamed the idol they had dropped.
- Curse. A stripped land becomes a public answer to a public question. It tells the nations that its people had forsaken the covenant.
- Flight. Running to Egypt changed their address, not their state. Going into the world mended nothing; it left them without heart or conscience.
- Mercy. Even under judgment God still knows the few and feeble that others dragged along. He opens a way back for them.
Because ye have burned incense, and because ye have sinned against Jehovah, and have not hearkened unto the voice of Jehovah, nor walked in his law, nor in his statutes, nor in his testimonies; therefore this evil hath come upon you, as at this day.
The Jews who had fled to Egypt told Jeremiah they would go on burning incense to the queen of heaven. Life had gone well while they did it, they said. This verse is the prophet's reply. He names the real cause of their ruin, and pins it on the very practice they were defending.
The people explained their troubles by their own experience. Jeremiah points them to the hand behind the ruin.
Why did they not trace their troubles to the chastening hand of God, which was the truth of it? That is exactly what the prophet presses home, with the simplicity and force of truth.
The people claimed their idolatry had made them prosper. Another writer names the reversal.
Jeremiah points out to them that it was the very thing that brought God's judgment on Judah and Jerusalem.
"Because you made offerings" sounds mild until you learn who received them.
This was the female form of Baal or Bel. She was called Beltis, Ashtaroth, Astarte, Alitta, Mylitta, Aphrodite, and other names. Her worship went hand in hand with the grossest immorality.
They did more than sin. They read their own disasters backwards.
So they gloried in their shame, taking no notice of the works of the LORD or of the work of His hands, and it destroyed them. They blamed their disasters on slighting the queen of heaven. They did so because they had given their will completely to a so-called religion that made depravity and passion sacred.
The verse does not stop at incense. It adds that they had not obeyed His voice or walked in His law, His statutes and His testimonies. These are the terms of a covenant, and that covenant carried a curse from the days of Moses.
The time has now come to carry out the curse. The curse spoken in the days of Moses fell in the days of Nebuchadnezzar. So a vast change took place in the people's relationship with the LORD. Until then they had been under chastening only. Now they came just as clearly under the curse. It was something new; they had broken the covenant.
The evidence was in front of them. What stopped them was not a lack of proof. One commentator traces the blindness to the will, not the mind.
Self-will had already fixed on a certain course, and it deceived them. Nothing warps the understanding and blocks the grasp of truth like self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see.
The habit Jeremiah is correcting is not unique to Egypt. One commentator turns the lesson on every reader.
This was tracing the evil up to its right source. It was departure from God and His holy commandments that had brought all this trouble on them. People are always inclined to forget the sin that caused the trouble and to think only of the trouble. But true wisdom will always lead us to look past the trouble to the cause that produced it.
- Cause. Jeremiah meets a false explanation with the true one. The ruin came from the chastening hand of God.
- Content. They burned their incense to the female form of Baal, known by many names, and her worship carried gross immorality with it.
- Confusion. They read the same events in reverse, blaming their ruin on neglect of the goddess instead of on God.
- Covenant. Behind the incense lay disobedience to His voice, His law, His statutes and His testimonies. The curse spoken in the days of Moses fell in the days of Nebuchadnezzar.
- Correction. Self-will refuses to see what it does not want to see; wisdom looks past the trouble to the cause that produced it.
And Jeremiah said unto all the people, and to all the women, Hear ye the word of Jehovah, all Judah that are in the land of Egypt.
This verse opens Jeremiah's last recorded message. He speaks it not in Jerusalem but in Egypt, to the survivors of Judah who had fled there against God's word. He calls the whole community to listen, men and women alike, right after they had told him to his face that they would not.
This message closes decades of preaching. One commentator sums up what the prophet now sets before them:
Now the prophet solemnly sets before all Judah in Egypt where their idolatry must end. Earlier chapters did the same for their unbelief and rebellious disobedience.
The call to hear is striking, because these hearers had just announced the opposite. It was nothing new to the prophet:
Throughout his life Jeremiah has seen his prophecies rejected and his warnings despised. Now it has happened again. Still, he follows the people into Egypt and even there warns them by the Word of the Lord (43:8-13). But all is in vain. They reply to him, "As for the word that you have spoken to us in the name of the Lord, we will not listen to you. But we will do everything that we have vowed" (44:16,17).
Egypt was not where God had put them. They asked the prophet for direction, then ignored it:
Still, if even at this last hour this remnant had submitted to Nebuchadnezzar's rule, peace would have reigned in the land, and the few who were left would have kept it. But there is no thought of trusting the Lord. They consult Jeremiah, then refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth. They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar, only to fall under the sword. That sword would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there under the king. In Egypt they give themselves up to idolatry, so that the wrath of God comes on them to the end.
Jeremiah names the women as well as the men. The idol worship he confronts was mainly theirs, but their husbands went along with it:
What hardness of heart, to say to the man of God, "We will not listen." They meant to carry out their vows to worship "the queen of Heaven." All they said was that things went well with them when they worshipped the queen of Heaven back in their own land. It seems the women were mostly the ones involved in this, but they acted with the knowledge and consent of their husbands.
They had their own explanation for the troubles that had come on them. The prophet gives the true one:
Why did they not trace their troubles to their real cause, the chastening hand of God? That is exactly what the prophet drives home, with the simplicity and force of truth.
In Egypt two words now stood against each other, theirs and God's. Only one could hold:
The answer is plain enough, and they heard what their fate would be for their deliberate unbelief and disobedience. These are solemn words, and the Lord said, "They shall know whose word will stand, Mine or theirs." God's Word will always stand, and so will those who stand by the Word of God and put their trust in it.
The message does not end in pure judgment. God still keeps count of a few:
How comforting it is to hear Him say even at such a time, "those who escape the sword shall return from the land of Egypt to the land of Judah, few in number" (v. 28). The blessed Lord knows the godly, and knows, too, how to deliver them. No doubt the proud and wilful had carried some into Egypt, like the prophet and Baruch. They were few and feeble. They were not there with a happy mind. Force of circumstances had carried them away. It is always cheering to remind our hearts of that word, "The Lord knows those who are His" (2 Tim. 2:19).
- Hear — the verse calls a crowd to listen that had just said out loud it would not.
- All — men and women are both named. The women led the idol worship, and their husbands agreed to it.
- Egypt — they asked for God's word, then did the opposite. The shelter they chose became the place of their loss.
- Whose word? — God said they would learn whose word stands, His or theirs. His word always stands.
- Yet — even here God counts a small number who escape. He knows those who are His, even among a people dragged to Egypt by the wilful.
Thus saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel, saying, Ye and your wives have both spoken with your mouths, and fulfilled with your hands, saying, We will certainly perform our vows which we have vowed, to burn incense to the queen of the heavens, and to pour out drink-offerings unto her. Ye will certainly establish your vows, and entirely perform your vows.
These words are not Jeremiah's. They are the people's own oath, quoted back to them by God. The Jews who had fled to Egypt had already told the prophet they would not listen. Their vow raises a hard question: what happens when someone hides a sin behind a religious promise and calls it faithfulness?
These people had gone down to Egypt for safety. The prophet had warned them not to.
The prophet announced what would fall upon the Jews who tried to escape by going down into Egypt. In Egypt, he said, they would only meet still more trouble from Nebuchadnezzar. God had set the Chaldean king over them. If they had stayed in the land under his authority, they would have been safe. But choosing human policy, they thought it safer to go down into Egypt, and it proved to be the opposite.
The verse names the men and the women, their mouths and their hands.
What hardness of heart, to say to the man of God, "We will not listen to you." They intended to perform their vows to worship "the queen of heaven." All they said was that things went well with them when they worshipped the queen of heaven back home. The women seem to have been the most involved in this, but they did it with the knowledge and consent of their husbands.
These refugees did not invent the title. They took it from the nations around them.
They had fallen in with the worship of a female idol. This worship was common among the idolatrous nations around them: the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. They called the Babylonian Venus, Ishtar, the queen of heaven. The Assyrians called her Beltis, the female form of Baal. In the sculpture they placed a star over her head and called her "the mistress of the heavens." The Phoenicians worshipped this "queen of heaven" under the name of Ashtoreth or Astarte. The Jews had adopted this wicked worship, with all its immoral ceremonies.
The vow names two acts: making offerings — older translations read "burning incense" — and pouring out drink offerings. Neither was a pagan invention. Both belonged to God's own worship.
Incense spoke of the merits of Christ. Drink offerings, as we have seen, spoke of the joy found in the life and death of the Lord Jesus. Yet by the incense they burned to idols and the wine they poured out, the people claimed by their action to have learned the merits belonging to false gods. They claimed to have found joy in a rite which, little as they knew it, was really the worship of demons. What an insult it was to God, and to the One whom the sacrifice represented, for Israel to give drink offerings to idols!
They treat the promise as binding, as if breaking a vow would be the real sin. One writer answers that head on.
Many men have vowed to commit a sin, and have used the vow as their excuse for doing it. Yet suppose someone had said to them, "Do you dare tell God that He wanted you to commit this murder?" — or whatever the sin may be. They would answer, "Certainly I cannot. Even nature tells me it is sin." If a man has vowed to be an apostle, or to convert many people, or never to marry, let him confess his sin, and leave himself in God's hands. He has assumed that the power lies in himself, and it is not there.
Why refuse warnings this plain? Jeremiah names the reason.
He says, "You dissembled in your hearts." A better translation is, "You deceived yourselves in your own souls." Their self-will was set on a certain course, and it deceived them. Nothing will warp the understanding and block the grasp of truth like self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see.
The verse ends by telling them to go ahead and keep their vows. God does not argue; events will answer them.
The answer is plain enough, and they heard what their fate would be for their deliberate unbelief and disobedience. These are solemn words, and the Lord said, "They shall know whose word will stand, Mine or theirs." God's word will always stand, and so will those who stand by the word of God and put their trust in it.
- Flight. Human policy looked safer than obedience. Egypt gave them the opposite — more trouble, not less.
- Vow. They used a promise as the excuse for the sin. The way out is to confess the sin, not to keep the vow.
- Insult. Incense and poured-out wine spoke of Christ. Offered to an idol, they insulted God Himself.
- Self-will. Under the vow lay a will already set. Self-will "will not see what it does not want to see."
- Verdict. Two words now stood against each other, theirs and God's. Events would show which one holds.
Therefore hear ye the word of Jehovah, all Judah that dwell in the land of Egypt Behold, I have sworn by my great name, saith Jehovah, that my name shall no more be named in the mouth of any man of Judah in all the land of Egypt, saying, [As] the Lord Jehovah liveth.
The people had just told Jeremiah to his face that they would go on burning incense to the queen of heaven. They even claimed they had been better off when they did. This verse is God's reply — not another plea, but an oath, and the one thing He swears by is His own great name.
God speaks last here. The people had heard the charge and chosen their course anyway.
The people, however, had become so hardened in their evil ways that they tell the prophet without hesitation, "We will not listen to you"! They tell him openly that they will continue their idolatry and burn incense to the queen of heaven. Their reason is this: when we did these things in Judah and Jerusalem we had plenty of bread, we were well, and we saw no disaster (vv. 15-19). Jeremiah points out that this was the very thing which brought God's judgment on Judah and Jerusalem (vv. 20-23). The prophet also told them that, since they were determined to continue their detestable practices, the Lord had said, "Behold, I have sworn by my great name, says the LORD, that my name shall no more be invoked by the mouth of any man of Judah in all the land of Egypt, saying, 'As the Lord GOD lives.'"
Why would God swear at all? One writer answers from what God alone is able to do, and from how quickly we doubt Him.
God could swear an oath, for He was able to carry it out, and He knew every consequence of what He pledged Himself to. It is beautiful to see Him do it when He wants to assure the soul of His creature, who is so ready to doubt the perfect faithfulness even of his God. "Therefore God, desiring to show more convincingly to the heirs of the promise the unchangeable character of His purpose, guaranteed it with an oath, so that by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we who have fled for refuge might have strong encouragement to hold fast to the hope set before us" (Heb. 6:13-18). His word is as certain as His oath, though it does not seem so to man.
What God removes here is a phrase these people still used. They had not stopped saying "the Lord lives"; they had simply set other gods beside Him. One writer, commenting on the same sin in another prophecy, shows why that mixture is worse than plain idolatry:
What made this idolatry so offensive was the joining of the idols of the nations with Jehovah. To be what we might call a plain, out-and-out idolater was far less evil than to show that you know the true God and then put false gods on a level with Him. This outrage against God is specially described here: people who worship and swear to the Lord, and who also swear by the idol Milcom.
The oath does not come early. One writer traces what God was doing in all the time before it.
If all this shows what man is in self-will and rebellion, it shows also what God is in patient grace and goodness (Jer. 44:4; 2 Peter 3:9). Grace follows them even into Egypt, and still pleads with them; but nothing humbles them or brings them to repentance (Jer. 44:5-10). But there is a limit to patience, and judgment follows from which there is no escape (Jer. 44:11-14). If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake.
Another group of Jews was in captivity in Babylon at this same time. Their story ran the opposite way.
These go down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and plague will destroy them. Those at Babylon are promised peace and prosperity and plenty, for a time. These take Jeremiah with them into Egypt, even though he announces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon, where Daniel prevails in prayer with God for their deliverance and restoration. At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity after they had turned away from the Lord. So going back to Egypt was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
- Refusal. The oath follows their flat "we will not listen" — God speaks last, after they have made their choice final.
- Oath. God can swear by His own name. He is able to carry it out, and He knows every consequence of what He promises.
- Mixture. They kept His name on their lips and put other gods beside Him. That insult runs deeper than open idolatry, so God removes His name from their mouths.
- Limit. Grace had followed them all the way into Egypt and pleaded there; patience is long, but it has an end.
- Destination. Babylon held a people who would come back; Egypt held a people who would not. Where you run to when you will not obey decides what you find there.
Behold, I will watch over them for evil, and not for good; and all the men of Judah that are in the land of Egypt shall be consumed by the sword and by the famine, until there be an end of them.
The men of Judah in this verse are survivors who had gone down to Egypt against God's warning. His answer to them raises a hard question: what does it mean for God to watch over His own people for harm instead of help?
One commentator traces what happens to a heart that hears a clear warning from God and refuses it:
Unbelief runs downhill fast once the heart hardens itself against a direct warning from the Lord. And the greater the earlier claim to godliness, the deeper the fall... God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they desert Him for another, woe to them! It cannot but be to their shame, sorrow and ruin.
They had also hoped that a new country would end their troubles:
If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We get tired of strife and divisions and weakness, but going into the world does not mend matters. We see here the sad effect of going into the world; it left them without heart or conscience.
God's watching usually means protection. Here the same close attention turns to judgment. Daniel prayed about this later, and called God righteous in it:
Daniel says, "The LORD has watched over the evil, and brought it upon us." The Lord had said to Jeremiah, "I will watch over them for evil, and not for good." The same prophet also tells us that the Lord had "watched over them, to pluck up, and to break down, and to throw down, and to destroy, and to afflict" (Jer. 44:27; Jer. 31:28). How serious this is! We find it easier to understand the Lord watching over His people to protect them. But here He watches over them for evil, and Daniel says the Lord is right in doing it. "The LORD our God is righteous in all His works which He does, for we did not obey His voice."
(The wording here follows older translations. Where they say "evil," the ESV says "disaster." The harm falls on the people; there is no wrongdoing in God.)
The same watchfulness that once stood ready to bless now stands ready to strike:
"Therefore the Lord has watched upon the evil and brought it upon us" (v. 14), as He watched upon the good to bless. How terrible, when the government of God watches upon the evil to make it come upon His people!
A commentator weighs what these people had become:
Sadly, they had ears, but they did not hear. The remnant was rotten to the core.
Another writer measures how far the judgment reached:
So God declares this of all those who had gone down to Egypt. Apart from "a very small company" that would escape (v. 28), "none of the remnant" would "escape or remain, so as to return into the land of Judah" (Jer. 44:14).
Even so, the next verse leaves a door open:
Yet in the middle of wrath—righteous wrath—He remembers mercy. How comforting to hear Him say even at such a time, "Yet a small number that escape the sword shall return out of the land of Egypt into the land of Judah" (v. 28). The blessed Lord knows the godly, and knows, too, how to deliver them. Some, no doubt, like the prophet and Baruch, were taken into Egypt by the proud and stubborn. They were few and weak. They were not there gladly. Circumstances had swept them along.
In the end the question was simple: whose word would prove true?
These are solemn words. The Lord said, "They shall know whose Word shall stand, Mine or theirs." God's Word will always stand, and so will those who stand by the Word of God and put their trust in it.
- Descent. Refusing a plain warning is not a pause but a slide — the greater the earlier claim to godliness, the deeper the fall.
- Relocation. They chose Egypt to escape trouble. It left them without heart or conscience.
- Watching. God normally watches over His people to protect them. Here He watches for harm — and Daniel calls that righteous.
- Remnant. Judgment falls, yet a small number escapes. The Lord knows those whom others dragged into Egypt.
- Standing. Only one word stands in the end — God's. Those who rest on it stand with Him.
And they that escape the sword shall return out of the land of Egypt into the land of Judah, a very small company; and all the remnant of Judah, that have come into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, shall know whose word shall stand, mine or theirs.
Judah's survivors ran to Egypt to be safe. God's answer is that only a handful of them will ever see Judah again — and those few will settle the question of whose word stands, His or theirs.
They had a real alternative. Fear, not faith, decided what they did:
Even at this last hour, this remnant could have submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar. Then peace would have reigned in the land, and these few who remained would have held it. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no idea of trusting in the Lord. They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth. They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. There they fall under the sword. That same sword would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there under the king.
The direction of their flight matters. Two groups of exiles existed at the same moment, and their histories ran opposite ways:
These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword, famine and plague will destroy them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. These carry Jeremiah with them into Egypt, though he announces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon, and there Daniel prevails in prayer with God for their deliverance and restoration. At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity later, when they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt was therefore fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.
Verse 14 leaves those in Egypt no escape; this verse sends a few home. One writer answers that tension by asking who exactly the threat speaks to:
But here there is a remnant. Here as elsewhere, when the remnant fails, that does not excuse any individual from being faithful. Those whom the leaders carried away do not belong to the class who dwelt in the land of Egypt. Six or seven times the chapter speaks to that class as dwellers in Egypt, and for them there is no escape (Jer. 44:14).
Mercy sits inside the sentence. God can tell the godly apart from the crowd:
While He is angry — rightly angry — He remembers mercy. How comforting to hear Him say even at such a time: "Yet those who escape the sword shall return from the land of Egypt to the land of Judah, few in number" (v. 28). The blessed Lord knows the godly, and knows, too, how to deliver them. No doubt the proud and wilful had carried some of them into Egypt, like the prophet and Baruch. They were few and feeble. They did not go there gladly; circumstances forced them. It is always cheering to remind our hearts of that word, "The Lord knows those who are His" (2 Tim. 2:19). In His own time He opens the way for them to walk where He would have them.
Their unbelief gets a plain answer. It ends by naming the real question:
The answer is plain enough, and they heard what their fate would be for their deliberate unbelief and disobedience. These are solemn words. The Lord said, "They shall know whose word will stand, Mine or theirs." God's word will always stand. So will those who stand by the word of God and put their trust in it.
That contest is not limited to Egypt. Belief does not decide whether a word holds:
Even if the thousand million people on this globe denied the truth of God's word, that word would still stand unmoved. Scripture does not depend for its truth upon man's belief. It is true whether he believes it or not.
Running from trouble into the world is the mistake this chapter exposes:
If people think that by going into the world they will escape trouble, they make a great mistake. We get tired of strife and divisions and weakness, but going into the world does not mend matters. We see here the sad effect of going into the world; it left them without heart or conscience.
- Word refused. They asked the prophet for God's word and then would not obey it; submission would have left them safe at home.
- Word avoided. Egypt looked like shelter from Nebuchadnezzar. It became the place where the sword found them.
- Word remembered. Even in anger God keeps a few — the feeble ones carried along by the wilful, whom He knows and can bring out.
- Word aimed. The doom falls on those who made Egypt their home. Failure all around never cancels your own duty to be faithful.
- Word standing. The survivors exist so that everyone learns whose word holds — and it is never man's, believed or not.
And this shall be the sign unto you, saith Jehovah, that I will punish you in this place, that ye may know that my words shall certainly stand against you for evil
Jeremiah speaks here in Egypt, not Jerusalem, to Jews who fled there against God's word and now burn incense to other gods. God ties a visible sign to His threat, to settle one question: whose word will stand?
God will punish them "in this place" — Egypt, the refuge they chose from the king of Babylon. That choice, not the danger they ran from, destroyed them:
The prophet announced what would fall upon the Jews who tried to escape by going down into Egypt. He showed them that there they would only meet with worse trouble from Nebuchadnezzar. If they had stayed in the land, under the Chaldean king whom God had placed over them, they would have been safe. But they chose human policy, thinking it was safer to go down into Egypt, and it proved to be the opposite. Nebuchadnezzar pursued the Egyptians and punished these unbelieving Jews in that land.
God gives the sign so that they "may know." Yet these people had just told His prophet to his face that they would not obey:
The people had become so hardened in their evil ways that they tell the prophet without hesitation, "We will not listen to you"! They openly tell him they will continue their idolatry and burn incense to the queen of heaven. Their reason, they say, is this: when we did these things in Judah and Jerusalem, we had plenty of bread, we were well, and we saw no evil. Jeremiah points out that this was the very thing which brought God's judgment on Judah and Jerusalem.
They read their past prosperity as proof that idolatry paid. Another writer asks the question they never asked:
Why did they not attribute their troubles, as was the truth, to the chastening hand of God?
The people had spoken, and God had spoken. Only one of the two words could hold:
The answer is plain enough. They heard what their fate would be for their deliberate unbelief and disobedience. These are solemn words. The Lord said, "They shall know whose Word shall stand, Mine or theirs." God's Word will always stand. So will those who stand by the Word of God and put their trust in it.
The next verse names the sign: the fall of Egypt's king. He was the protection they had run to, and he would fall as Judah's own king had:
Still, God would spare even a little remnant of these. But He would give up Pharaoh Hophra, the king they trusted, into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar, as He had given up Zedekiah.
Hophra's own boasting made his end all the more pointed:
Hophra was full of pride. Records say he claimed that not even a god could overthrow him. Such arrogance could not go unpunished... Jeremiah 44:30 mentions Hophra. God delivered him into the hands of those "that sought his life," which were some of his own people.
God's words stand "against you for harm" — yet that is not the chapter's last word. One writer notices the small door left open:
Yet in the middle of wrath — righteous wrath — He remembers mercy. How comforting to hear Him say even at such a time, "Yet a small number that escape the sword shall return out of the land of Egypt into the land of Judah." The blessed Lord knows the godly. He knows, too, how to deliver them. Some, doubtless, like the prophet and Baruch, had been carried into Egypt by the proud and wilful. They were few and feeble. They had not gone there by choice; circumstances forced them.
That refusal did not die with them. One commentator draws the line to our own day:
What defiance and wickedness, the fruit of their unbelieving hearts! Greater still is the defiance and wickedness of today, when people deliberately reject the cross and the gospel of Christ.
- The claim. God and the people had each spoken. This verse settles which word holds: "God's Word will always stand."
- The defiance. They had told the prophet outright that they would not listen. They read their old prosperity as proof that idolatry paid.
- The sign. The proof God chose was the fall of Pharaoh Hophra. He was the king they had run to for safety, and he had boasted that no god could overthrow him.
- The fulfilment. Egypt was no refuge. The sword they fled in Judah found them there. Hophra fell into the hands of those who sought his life.
- The mercy. Even here a small number would escape and return. "The blessed Lord knows the godly, and knows, too, how to deliver them."
thus saith Jehovah Behold, I will give Pharaoh-Hophra king of Egypt into the hand of his enemies, and into the hand of them that seek his life; as I gave Zedekiah king of Judah into the hand of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, his enemy, and that sought his life.
Jeremiah's last recorded message to the Jews in Egypt ends with a name. Pharaoh Hophra was the king they had settled under for safety. God promises to hand him over to the men hunting him, just as He had handed over Zedekiah, king of Judah. That fall would prove whose word stands: God's or theirs.
Judah's own king had once counted on this pharaoh to drive off the Babylonians.
The king of Egypt addressed in this prophecy was Pharaoh-Hophra, called in Greek, Apries. He was the grandson of Pharaoh-Necho, who defeated King Josiah at Megiddo. King Zedekiah of Judah expected help and relief from Pharaoh-Hophra while Jerusalem was under siege. Hophra's army marched up through Phoenicia. It forced the Chaldeans to lift the siege of Jerusalem. But the relief was only temporary, for the Egyptian army had to retire.
God attaches a sign to the warning just before this verse. One event would show the rest was true.
He gives them a sign that this will happen. Hophra is to be given into the hands of his enemies. This took place a few years before Nebuchadrezzar defeated Amasis, who had succeeded Hophra.
The sign also took a shape they already knew.
They were determined to continue their evil practices. So the Lord had said, "I have sworn by My great Name, says the Lord, that My Name shall no more be named in the mouth of any man of Judah in all the land of Egypt." Instead they would be consumed. The king of Jerusalem had been given into the hand of the king of Babylon, and the king of Egypt would be given up in the same way.
The refugees had gone to Egypt to get out of Nebuchadnezzar's reach. God's answer names the man they were hiding behind.
They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. But there they fall under the sword. That sword would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there in subjection to the king. In Egypt they give themselves up to idolatry, so that the wrath of God might come upon them to the end. Still, God would spare even a little remnant of these. But Pharaoh-Hophra, whom they trusted, would be given up into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar, as Zedekiah had been.
God still promised to spare a small remnant. Commentators differ on who brought Hophra down. Some point to Nebuchadnezzar. Others point to his own people.
The verse says enemies would seek his life. It does not say where they would come from.
Hophra was filled with pride, and it is recorded that he said not even a god could overthrow him. Such arrogance could not go unpunished… God delivered him into the hands of "those who seek his life." They were some of his own people.
The way he defended his throne helps explain it.
He was as proud as he was prosperous, and he relied mainly on hired foreign troops… We know that his own subjects revolted. They fought and defeated his foreign troops, and in the end they put him to death.
Under the politics lies something worse. Going to Egypt was more than a bad plan.
Going down into Egypt for safety was not natural for people who had always bowed to Babylon unwillingly… But it became a fatal step once the prophet gave them the word of the Lord. That word assured them of safety in the land under Nebuchadnezzar, and of destruction in Egypt. Egypt was where their impulse, indeed their determination, drove them to go for shelter. God loves to be the Saviour of those who bear His name; if they desert Him for another, woe to them!
Egypt had failed people this way before.
The help of man is useless against the word of God. This was not the first time Egypt had proved a broken reed, piercing the hand of those who leaned on it.
- Trusted. Hophra was Necho's grandson. He had once lifted the siege of Jerusalem, so the refugees could name no stronger protector.
- Named. God singles out the man they trusted, because the shelter people choose instead of Him is the first thing to go.
- Signed. God gave his fall as a sign, so they would know whose words stand: God's or their own.
- Emptied. His own subjects were among the enemies who took his life. They beat the hired troops he had leaned on.
- Repeated. Egypt had already pierced the hand that leaned on it. Leaving the Saviour for another ends the same way every time.
The word that Jeremiah the prophet spoke to Baruch the son of Nerijah, when he wrote these words in a book at the mouth of Jeremiah, in the fourth year of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah, the king of Judah, saying,
Jeremiah 45 opens with a message aimed not at a nation or a king, but at the man who had just laid down his pen after writing out the prophet's words. Two questions follow: why does God speak to a secretary by name, and why does this old word sit so late in the book?
The verse names the scribe and his father. One reference work fills in the rest: Baruch was the "son of Neriah, and faithful secretary to Jeremiah," later "carried with Jeremiah into Egypt" (Morrish Bible Dictionary). Writing "these words in a book at the dictation of Jeremiah" was slow work:
The work clearly took a long time: the book was not read out to the people until the ninth month of the fifth year of Jehoiakim. You can picture the two men in the house where Jeremiah lived. The Spirit of God guides the prophet as he carefully dictates the words of the Lord, and Baruch bends to the task of writing on the scroll. All the while both men know they are passing on the very words of God to everyone who would read the message.
The date is "the fourth year of Jehoiakim" — years before the scenes in Egypt that come just before it in the book. One writer sees a lesson in that order:
Why does it stand here, when it was spoken as far back as the fourth year of Jehoiakim — which the Spirit pointedly tells us in verse 1? Surely to teach us this lesson: our true wisdom is to act on the Word of God without question. By the time this word was written down, Baruch had no chance left to win any greatness for himself. Things were very different when the word first came to him. Princes and nobles were then in Jerusalem. Now the city lay in ruins, and he was with the miserable remnant in Egypt.
The gap is wide: chapter 45 gives "the latest notice of his friend and scribe Baruch, though in fact the message placed here was given some twenty years earlier" (William Kelly).
Baruch was no detached clerk.
Most of the people were indifferent to everything Jeremiah said, if not hostile to it — but not Baruch. He not only wrote down the prophecies of judgment, he felt their weight and sorrow... The woe was pronounced on the people, but he felt it for himself, saying, "Woe is me!" ... He at least believed what he had written, and he knew the final crash was still coming, and coming soon.
The Lord did not overlook the man with the pen, and He knew what was in his heart.
When Baruch laid down his pen, the work finished, the Lord sent him a special message, showing that He had not forgotten the faithful scribe. But there must have been some disappointment in Baruch's heart. Had he expected some special recognition? Was he seeking something for himself, expecting great things? ... It is the very heart of the old nature to seek great things, to be ambitious for earthly possessions and honours, to please oneself. God's people need to watch against this more than against anything else.
William Kelly draws out how a servant should feel when everything is collapsing:
The great lesson for Baruch was this: in a day of judgment, the right feeling for a saint and servant of God is to stop seeking anything for himself... A lowly mind always suits a saint, but in an evil day it is the only safety. Humility is always right, but it is also the one thing that keeps a man from judgment. I am speaking now not of God's final judgment, but of the judgment carried out in this world.
God refused him greatness, not safety. His name carries the irony: "Baruch — the man worn out with sighing — means 'blessed,' and in spite of his sorrow that is what he was" (J. Wilson Smith).
He was to know himself small; he would be marked by sorrow and sighing; he would be little in his own eyes. The one thing he could always count on was his life; that was secured. It would be handed to him as a prize — always safe. His own interests stayed safe, whatever else broke down.
The chapter leaves every reader one question: "Am I after great things here, or am I after the Lord? ... Let us learn to trust the blessed Lord, and so be free to grow in grace and in the most excellent knowledge of Himself" (H. J. Vine).
- Small and named. God gives a whole chapter to the man who only held the pen. Writing another man's words did not hide Baruch from Him.
- Small and grieving. Baruch believed what he copied, and he grieved over it. God answered that sorrow with a message for him alone.
- Small and searched. Under the grief lay a wish to be noticed. God dealt with the hidden motive, not the visible tears.
- Small and safe. When everything is collapsing, humility is not only right. Commentators call it the one thing that keeps a servant safe.
- Small and blessed. God refused him advancement and promised him his life. The man whose name means "blessed" kept the blessing by staying small.
Thus saith Jehovah, the God of Israel, concerning thee, Baruch
Jeremiah 45 is the shortest chapter in the book. It speaks to one man, not to a nation or a king. That man is Baruch, the scribe who wrote Jeremiah's words down. Verse 2 opens that message. Three things carry its weight: who speaks, that He speaks to one person, and that He speaks that person's name.
Who was he? One short summary of his life answers in a line, and lists where his name appears:
Son of Neriah, and faithful secretary to Jeremiah. He was eventually carried with Jeremiah into Egypt. Jer. 32:12-16; Jer. 36:4-32; Jer. 43:3, 6; Jer. 45:1-2.
His work put him beside the prophet while the nation slid toward ruin:
In the days of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah, things in Judah and Jerusalem were growing worse fast. Jeremiah was the prophet. God raised him up and sent him to proclaim the word of the Lord, and to expose with courage the state of things that was leading to the final disaster. Baruch was the scribe. His work was to write in a book the solemn words Jeremiah had to speak.
Baruch's task was to write down words about everyone else. This message came when that task was finished, and it was about him:
Note that this did not take place in Egypt, where the prophet and his friend were now staying. It happened in the fourth year of Jehoiakim. Baruch had just finished writing the words Jeremiah dictated. It was no doubt a hard task. When Baruch laid down his pen, the work finished, the Lord sent him a special message. It showed that He had not forgotten the faithful scribe.
The title used here belongs to the God whose own nation was about to be pulled down. Jeremiah's own habit of speech shows how freely God allows His servants to name Him and be named by Him:
Like every real servant of the Lord, Jeremiah laboured in the awareness that there was one true God. The truth of Deuteronomy 6:4 was laid deep within him. "Jehovah our Elohim is one Jehovah." He knew Him. He used many names and titles to speak of Him, singular and plural too… The name "Jehovah" is used over six hundred times, as if he would hold the people by that name of relationship and covenant. And despite their turning away, he speaks of "Jehovah Elohim" over fifty times, clinging to the fact that Jehovah was their one true God.
Jehovah and Elohim are Hebrew names for God; the ESV prints them as "the LORD" and "God."
Commentators also trace a pattern. Once a nation's turning away is complete, God addresses one faithful servant:
The children of Israel had betrayed the Lord beyond hope. Their departure was complete before His eyes. It was not only the first part torn away, the ten tribes of Israel, but the remaining two as well… Not only Judah failed, but even the house of David, the anointed king, the last regular link between God and His people. Then we find that God addressed not His people, but one chosen faithful servant as His witness.
The message came years before the point in the story where it appears. That placement teaches something:
Why should it be put here, when it was spoken as far back as the fourth year of Jehoiakim, as the Spirit is careful to tell us in verse 1? It is surely to teach us this lesson: our true wisdom is to act on the Word of God without question. By the time this was recorded, Baruch had no chance to gain any greatness for himself. Things were very different when the word first came to him. Princes and nobles were then in Jerusalem. Now the city lay in ruins, and he was with the wretched remnant in Egypt.
Baruch's case still holds for us, but with a limit:
We can count on the Lord's personal interest and care, as Baruch could. But it would have been pride on his part to try to rebuild the city and the nation… Do not let proud thoughts about the church turn the heart from the Lord Himself. What governs us? Great things, or the Lord?
And his name carried a verdict his feelings did not match:
Baruch — the man who fainted in sighing — means "blessed," and such, in spite of his sorrow, he was.
- Named. God speaks here to one man, Baruch, whose name means "blessed" — and the name held true while everything around him fell apart.
- Noticed. The message reached him the moment he laid down his pen. The Lord had not forgotten His faithful scribe.
- Spoken. The God of Israel speaks — the God who held His people by His covenant name even while they turned away.
- Timed. The word came long before the book records it. Our wisdom is to act on God's word without question, before events force the lesson.
- Ours. We can still count on that same personal interest and care, as long as the Lord governs the heart and not the pull of great things.
Thou didst say, Woe unto me! for Jehovah hath added grief to my sorrow; I am weary with my sighing, and I find no rest.
Baruch wrote down Jeremiah's prophecies of ruin. In this short chapter God turns from a doomed nation to give one personal message to His secretary. Verse 3 is God repeating Baruch's own complaint back to him. Was that sorrow right? And why did the Lord answer it as He did?
Baruch had copied out every sentence of judgment. One writer notes that he looked past the invading king and took his trouble from God Himself:
The masses of the people were indifferent, if not hostile, to all that Jeremiah had to say: but not so Baruch. He not only wrote down the prophecies of judgment, but he felt the weight and sorrow of them, as we see in verse 3 of that short chapter. God had pronounced woe on the people, but he felt it for himself, saying, "Woe is me!" And he accepted it from God. He might well have spoken of Nebuchadnezzar, the great Babylonian king, as bringing the misery upon them. But no. What he cried was, "The LORD has added sorrow to my pain." He at least believed the things he had written, and he knew that the final crash was still to come, and near at hand.
Judah had run out of remedies:
The people, stiff-necked as ever, had turned a deaf ear to the calls of God through His servants. Remedy there was none. All that could have been done for the vineyard had been done; and now the curtain of long-suffering must fall, and the cup must be drained.
Baruch felt boxed in, with no way out and no end in sight. One writer says this weariness of soul should never be a believer's portion:
Baruch was clearly troubled on every side, and hemmed in as well. His way was blocked, as he thought. He felt left to distress without measure or end, with destruction staring him in the face. He was disheartened and weary; he could find no rest for his soul. This should never be for the believer... For, as Isaiah declares, the everlasting God, Jehovah, never faints or grows weary. More than that, He gives power to the faint and increases strength to those who have no might. So nature's own strength fails completely in the hour of trial. But those who wait on Jehovah only exchange their strength. They mount up as eagles, run without growing weary, and walk without fainting.
Commentators differ on how to read Baruch's words. Some treat them simply as godly grief. One writer asks whether Baruch had truly accepted God's dealings with Israel:
Did Baruch simply and thoroughly vindicate Jehovah's ways with Israel? Did he in his heart sanctify the Lord God who had broken to pieces the people that He loved? I seriously doubt it. Otherwise he would not have been so overwhelmed. He would have looked to Him and found an answer of rest in his spirit for the tears which He puts in His bottle. But as with us, so with His afflicted servant of old: God knew every thought and intent of the heart; and this in pity, yet in faithfulness too.
The same writer names what always lies underneath in such cases:
In such cases there is always an inner forgetfulness of the Lord. There is a lack of communion with His mind and ways. And there is an allowance of desires which spring from self, whatever plausible cover they may wear in our own eyes or before others.
In the middle of a national disaster, Baruch received a promise of his own — and a command with it:
Baruch took deeply to heart what he was writing. Oppressed by fear, he could not sleep and grew weary with his sorrow and grief (Jer. 45:3)... So Baruch received the assurance that his life would be spared. On the basis of this promise, he could take to heart the exhortation given him, "And do you seek great things for yourself? Do not seek them."
Baruch's weeping did not stop Babylon. But that is not the measure of it:
Tears may not make the enemy tremble. But when truly shed in the sympathies of Christ, they receive the "mark" of God, and His preservation (see Ezek. 9). They gain God's blessing.
- Felt. Baruch believed what he wrote. The weight of it broke him, while the crowd around him stayed indifferent.
- Traced. He did not blame the invading king; He said the LORD had added sorrow to his pain, and he took it from God's hand.
- Exposed. Finding no rest points to something underneath — forgetting the Lord, and desires that spring from self, however respectable they look.
- Answered. God knew every thought of his heart. He answered in pity and in faithfulness: do not seek great things, and your life is safe.
- Kept. Tears shed in sympathy with Christ receive God's mark and His preservation. Baruch lost the nation, but he kept his life.
Thus shalt thou say unto him, Thus saith Jehovah Behold, what I have built do I overthrow, and what I have planted I pluck up, even this whole land.
Baruch was the scribe who wrote down Jeremiah's prophecies, and the weight of them had crushed him. God's reply names who is pulling Judah down: not Babylon, but God Himself, undoing His own work.
Baruch stood apart from the crowd, and he traced his grief to the right source.
Most of the people were indifferent to everything Jeremiah said, if not hostile to it. Baruch was not. He not only wrote down the prophecies of judgment, but he felt the weight and sorrow of them... He could well have blamed Nebuchadnezzar, the great king of Babylon, for bringing the misery on them. But no. What he cried was, "The LORD has added sorrow to my pain." He at least believed what he had written, and he knew the final crash was still to come, and near at hand.
Building and planting were God's own work for Israel. Now He pulls both down, and that settles what His servant must not try to rebuild.
The Lord who had built and planted would break down and pluck up both the city and the people!... We can count upon the Lord's personal interest and care like Baruch, but it would have been pride on his part to try to rebuild the city and the nation. Anyone who knows something of the importance of the truth of Christ and the church should beware of this trap of rebuilding today. Do not let proud thoughts about church position turn the heart away from the Lord Himself. What governs us? Great things, or the Lord?
Why say this to a man already grieving? One writer reads Baruch's collapse as a sign that he had not yet agreed with God about what God was doing.
Did Baruch fully and honestly justify the Lord's ways with Israel? Did he in his heart treat as holy the Lord God who had broken to pieces the people He loved? I strongly doubt it. If he had, he would not have been so overwhelmed. He would have looked to Him and found rest of spirit for the tears that He keeps in His bottle. But it is the same with us as with His suffering servant long ago: God knew every thought and intention of the heart. He knew it with pity, and with faithfulness too.
This verse sets up the question in verse 5. If God Himself is bringing the whole land down, seeking greatness in it makes no sense.
The great lesson for Baruch was this: in a day of judgment, the right attitude for a believer and servant of God is to seek nothing for himself... A humble mind always suits the believer, but in an evil day it is the only safety. Humility is always right, but it is also the only thing that keeps a person from judgment. I am speaking now not of God's final judgment, but of the judgment He carries out in this world.
God did not leave Baruch with nothing. The promise was small, and it was enough to let him obey.
One day while he is writing, Jeremiah stops dictating and tells his friend that the Lord, the God of Israel, has a special message for him. Everything in the whole land will be overthrown. Disaster will come on all people. "But I will give you your life as a prize of war in all places to which you may go" (v.5). So Baruch received the assurance that God would spare his life. With that promise, he could take to heart the command given to him.
The lesson reaches past Baruch. It rules out ambition even when the ambition is for the church.
This instruction is of great value to us who share in a heavenly calling in the present ruined state of Christendom. Not that the Christian was ever allowed to seek great things for himself, or even for the church. True discipleship cannot be separated from the cross, because the share we hope for in the glory of God depends on the crucified One... Baruch had only his life guaranteed to him, whatever happened and wherever he went.
- God's hand — God breaks down what He built and pulls up what He planted. This is His own act, not just a foreign army's work.
- God's reach — the judgment covers the whole land. It leaves no corner standing where a servant could build a career.
- God's reading — Baruch's despair showed a heart not yet at peace with God's ways. God answered his unspoken thoughts, not just his words.
- God's ruling — God Himself was tearing the city down. To rebuild it would have been pride, not humility. The same warning holds for anyone trying to rebuild today.
- God's gift — God promised Baruch one thing: his life, kept wherever he went. That single promise made "do not seek them" possible to obey.
And seekest thou great things for thyself? seek [them] not; for behold, I will bring evil upon all flesh, saith Jehovah; but thy life will I give unto thee for a prey in all places whither thou shalt go.
Baruch was Jeremiah's secretary, and this message is God's personal word to him. It does not open with comfort. It brings a searching question about ambition, and then one bare promise about his life.
The question is not asking for information. It exposes what God had already seen in a faithful man.
Had he expected some special recognition? Was he seeking something for himself, expecting great things? Had he planned, and was he lifted up with some high ambition? It would seem that this was the case, for He who knows the thoughts of His creatures from far away said to him: "Do you seek great things for yourself? Seek them not." It is the very heart of the old nature to seek great things, to be ambitious for earthly possessions and honours, to please oneself. God's people need to watch against this more than against anything else.
Something else always lies under that kind of ambition.
In such cases there is always an inner forgetfulness of the Lord. There is a lack of communion with His mind and ways. There is an allowance of desires that spring from self, whatever plausible cover they may wear in our own eyes or before others.
God ties the command to a coming disaster on all flesh. That link turns lowliness into a shelter.
The great lesson for Baruch was this. In a day of judgment, the proper feeling for a saint and servant of God is an absence of self-seeking… Lowliness of mind always suits the saint. But in an evil day it is the only safety. Humility is always morally right, but it is also the only thing that preserves from judgment. I am speaking now not of God's final judgment, but of the judgment carried out in this world.
Chasing greatness ruins good days as well as bad ones.
From the moment Solomon began to seek great things for himself and pile up riches, decline set in for the nation and its kings. Self-seeking in a day of prosperity is ruinous, and even more so in a day of decline and disaster.
God's one promise to Baruch is about his life. Where the ESV says "prize of war," older translations say "prey" or "spoil."
Self-advancement was definitely ruled out. He was simply told that his life would be given to him as a "prey" or "spoil" wherever he might be carried. God would preserve his life, and that was the only profit he was to expect.
That promise came with a low place to take.
He was to be consciously small. He would be marked by sorrow and sighing. He would be little in his own eyes. The one thing he could always count on was his life; that was secured. His own interests were safe, whatever else might break down.
This word came to Baruch years before the events in the chapters around it. Why record it here?
It is surely to teach us that our true wisdom is to act on the Word of God without question. When this was recorded there was no opportunity for Baruch to gain any greatness for himself. When the word was first given to him, things were very different. Princes and nobles were in Jerusalem. Now the city was devastated, and he was with the wretched remnant in Egypt… Ruin had been foretold, complete and beyond repair. When that is the case, the faithful servant is to cling to the Lord alone. He is to act on the word, and not look for great things here.
This word reaches believers now, and it goes further than personal ambition.
This instruction is of great value to us who share a heavenly calling in the present ruined state of Christendom. Not that the Christian was ever allowed to seek great things for self, or even for the church… Baruch had only his life guaranteed to him, come what might, and wherever he might go. Our place as Christians is association with Christ — the cross, and the glory.
The instruction is not only negative. God puts something in place of the ambition He takes away.
So the word to us is, "Seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God" (Col. 3:1)… Obeying this instruction, we will be set free from seeking great things for ourselves. And, what is more, we will be seeking the great things of God… So let us remind ourselves of this. As with Baruch, so with us — only in a far deeper and more wonderful way — our life has been given to us as our "spoil."
- Great grief. Baruch was a true servant who shared the sorrow of the coming ruin — and God still had a question to ask him.
- Great things for self. The desire to rise is the instinct of the old nature. Watch against it more than anything else.
- Great danger. Judgment was falling on all flesh. So self-seeking was not just wrong; it was unsafe. Humility was the only shelter.
- Great gift. Instead of advancement, Baruch got one thing: his life as spoil, safe wherever he went.
- Great things of God. God does not leave the space empty. Seek the things above, where Christ is.