Jeremiah 40–41

Jeremiah 40:1 · Darby

The word that came to Jeremiah from Jehovah, after that Nebuzar-adan the captain of the body-guard had let him go from Ramah, when he had taken him, being bound in chains, among all the captivity of Jerusalem and Judah, that were carried away captive to Babylon.

Jerusalem has fallen. The prophet who warned of it now stands in a line of chained captives at Ramah, and God's word reaches him there, at the moment his chains come off.

Where the Chapter Stands

This verse opens a new part of the book. What follows is no longer prophecy about a coming fall. It is the story of the people left behind after it.

In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we have the anarchy and moral disorder that prevailed among the Jews who were left behind in the land or its vicinity when most of their fellow countrymen had been carried captive to Babylon. Jeremiah becomes their helper, ministering to them the word of the LORD, but finds among them the greatest unbelief.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Chains at Ramah

Nebuchadnezzar himself had ordered Jeremiah's protection. Yet the prophet ended up in irons among the captives bound for Babylon.

Nebuchadnezzar had given special orders about Jeremiah: "Keep an eye on him and do him no harm; but do for him whatever he asks of you." The captain of the bodyguard takes him out of the court of the guard. Yet, through some unexplained mistake, he is bound with chains and found among the captives being transported to Babylon.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

A Foreign Officer's Confession

Nebuzaradan then tells Jeremiah why the city fell. The LORD had warned of this disaster and has now brought it, because the people sinned. One writer warns us not to mistake that speech for faith.

It is easy to admit the truth once a prophecy has come true. Even a man with no part in God's blessing for His people can do it — especially when it raises him above his fallen enemies. Nebuzaradan can talk piously once his master had gained the victory over Jerusalem, just as the LORD had declared. Here is the confession: He had warned, and at last carried out His word, and this because of their sins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Roads Open

With the chains off, Jeremiah faces a real choice: comfort in Babylon, or hardship at home.

Jeremiah is now reaching the end of his public ministry. He is probably at least sixty years old. Two choices are placed before him. He may go to Babylon. There he can enjoy the king's favours. There he will find his friends Daniel, Ezekiel and other captives taken away earlier. And there he can spend the rest of his life in relative quiet. On the other hand, he may remain with the poor of the land in Palestine and carry on a ministry among them.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The Choice He Made

He stayed. He went to Gedaliah at Mizpah and lived among the people who were left in the land.

But Jeremiah had no heart for Chaldea, whatever attractions might seem to be there. He preferred to suffer in the land with the lowest of those whom men had left behind... It was love to remain in the scene of their humiliation; it was a pledge of restoration.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer applies the same choice to a small, unimpressive gathering a believer might be tempted to leave.

He prefers to stay with the poor of the people of God in their poverty rather than enjoy the favours of the king of Babylon. Perhaps there is not much to attract a person in one's own meeting — not many spiritual gifts, not an abundance of warm fellowship. If, however, the Lord through His presence fulfils His promise to be in the midst of two or three gathered to His name, is that not the place where one should stay, and, leaning on Him, try to add some spiritual blessing there?

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Right Place, Wrong Heart

The people left in the land were in the right place. The chapters that follow show how they behaved.

Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must somehow have better qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only leave us open to bad behaviour and to hypocrisy, as is illustrated here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully. Calling on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Chains — the king's orders protected Jeremiah, yet he ended up bound among the captives. At Ramah, God's word reaches him.

- Released — the chains come off, and a new section of the book opens: the story of those left in the land.

- Confession — a foreign officer names the true reason for the ruin. But admitting a prophecy after it comes true costs nothing.

- Choice — comfort in Babylon or poverty at home. Near the end of his life, the prophet chose the poor of the land.

- Love — staying in the scene of their humiliation was love, and a pledge of restoration. Yet the right place is no substitute for the right heart.

Jeremiah 40:2 · Darby

And the captain of the body-guard took Jeremiah, and said unto him, Jehovah thy God pronounced this evil upon this place,

A foreign officer stands in the ruins of a city his own army has just destroyed. He turns to a prisoner and tells him why it fell. His answer is the same message Jeremiah had preached, and the same message Jerusalem refused. The words are true. But the mouth they come from raises a question the commentators press: does admitting that God has spoken make a man God's own?

The Man Who Spoke

The speaker is Nebuchadnezzar's top commander. The hand that broke Jerusalem is the hand that unlocks Jeremiah's chains.

He was captain of the guard, the commander in chief of Nebuchadnezzar's army at the capture of Jerusalem, and later at its destruction. He set Jeremiah free from his chains. He told him that God had brought all this destruction on Jerusalem because the people had sinned against Jehovah and had not obeyed His voice. He let Jeremiah go wherever he wanted.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Prophet Found Among the Captives

Jeremiah was a protected prisoner by Nebuchadnezzar's own command. Something then went wrong.

Nebuchadnezzar had given special orders about Jeremiah: "Keep an eye on him and do him no harm; treat him just as he asks you to." The captain of the body-guard takes him out of the court of the guard. Yet by a mistake no one can explain, he ends up in chains among the captives on their way to Babylon.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Truth on a Stranger's Lips

The officer calls the LORD Jeremiah's God, not his own. And the confession costs him nothing: the ruin he describes is his own side's victory.

We see from this how easy it is to own the truth once a prophecy has come true. It is easy even for a man who has no part in God's blessing for His people. It is easier still when it exalts him over the enemy who has fallen. Nebuzaradan can talk piously once his master had gained the victory over Jerusalem according to the declaration of the Lord. He admits that God had warned, that God carried out His word in the end, and that this came because of their sins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The contrast with Jeremiah's own countrymen is sharp.

But while Jeremiah laboured and testified, he had the bitter lot of finding his worst enemies among those he loved and pitied and rebuked so strongly. Their refusal to believe Jehovah's word came from their rebellion of will against Jehovah Himself, as it always does, whatever men say or boast. Nebuchadnezzar and his servants shone in honouring Jeremiah. They stood in sharp contrast to the priests, the false prophets, and even kings Jehoiakim and Zedekiah.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the Disaster Came

The officer calls the fall of the city God's doing, not Babylon's. Jeremiah had told them the same thing, and told them what to do about it.

But the question was, What had God said? God told His prophet Jeremiah that the only path of safety and the only path of honouring Him was to submit to the king of Babylon. The king of Babylon might be very wicked. But God's people were wicked too. God gave them into the hands of the king of Babylon as a judgment on their evil.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Accepting that verdict is where faith and unbelief part.

Jehovah meant their exile to be for their eventual good. This is a very important point. In a day of ruin faith always recognises the chastening of God and bows to it. Unbelief always resists, and counts it patriotism or perhaps religion to oppose.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Word That Was Verified

The officer reports it as history. God had said it in advance, down to details no one could have arranged.

The case of Zedekiah is perhaps even more astonishing, because of how exactly the puzzling details came true. God plainly foretold that He would hand Zedekiah over, with the city and the people, to Nebuchadnezzar — and that is what happened. There was nothing obscure in that, though it was solemnly true. There was nothing puzzling either in Jeremiah's words to Zedekiah: the city would be burned with fire, and his eyes would see the eyes of the king of Babylon. No doubt, once the words came true, they would speak with a loud voice to Zedekiah. The reference to his eyes, made so often, must have made him feel afterwards that he had stood in the presence of One who knows everything, when he heard, but did not heed, the words of the suffering prophet.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Spoken — God announced the disaster long before Babylon marched. The word came first, the army second.

- Verified — the word came true down to the details, so those who ignored it had to face a God who knew everything in advance.

- Confessed — even a foreign commander could say it plainly, because owning a prophecy costs nothing once it has come true.

- Refused — the people who had the word rejected it; their unbelief was rebellion of the will, not a lack of evidence.

- Received — faith bows to God's chastening, which He meant for their eventual good. Unbelief resists and calls its resistance loyalty.

Jeremiah 40:3 · Darby

and Jehovah hath brought [it about] and done according as he said; for ye have sinned against Jehovah, and have not hearkened unto his voice, therefore this thing is come upon you.

Jerusalem has fallen. The prophet who warned the city now stands in chains among the prisoners bound for Babylon. The commander who burned the city turns to him and explains the disaster in the prophet's own terms. Why can a foreign soldier say what Judah would never accept?

The prophet found among the captives

The speaker is the officer who led Nebuchadnezzar's army at the fall of the city:

Captain of the guard, or commander in chief of Nebuchadnezzar's army at the capture of Jerusalem, and afterwards at its destruction. He released Jeremiah from his chains. He told him that God had brought all this destruction on Jerusalem, because the people had sinned against the LORD and had not obeyed His voice. He gave Jeremiah liberty to go where he pleased.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

How Jeremiah ended up in chains at all is a puzzle, since the king had given orders for his safety:

Nebuchadnezzar had given special orders about Jeremiah: "Keep an eye on him and do him no harm; do for him whatever he asks of you." The captain of the bodyguard takes him out of the court of the guard. Yet, by a mistake no one can explain, he is bound with chains. He ends up among the captives on their way to Babylon.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

A soldier's sermon after the fact

The officer's words are true. But commentators note how easy such words are once the outcome is clear and you stand on the winning side:

We see from this how easy it is to own the truth after a prophecy comes true. Even a man with no part in God's blessing for His people can do it, especially when the truth lifts him above the fallen enemy. Nebuzaradan can talk like a godly man once his master had won the victory over Jerusalem, just as the Lord had declared. It is confessed that He had warned, and finally carried out His word, and this because of their sins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the disaster came

The officer names two causes: sin, and refusal to listen. Judah's leaders had heard the way out and treated it as treason:

The Lord meant their exile to be for their eventual good. In a day of ruin faith always recognises the chastening of God and bows to it. Unbelief always resists, and counts it patriotism or perhaps religion to oppose. Jeremiah seemed to the men of Judah to be a very false Jew for this reason. He always advised them to submit to the king of Babylon. They thought themselves much better Jews, because they were willing to fight against the king of Babylon.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Even after the city fell, the same offer stood, and the same refusal followed:

If these survivors had accepted Nebuchadnezzar's rule at this last hour, peace would have reigned in the land. These few who remained would have kept it. There is no thought of trusting in the Lord. They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Fulfilled down to the details

What the officer confesses is that God said it and God did it. That exactness runs through the whole book:

God's word about King Jehoahaz, or rather "Shallum" (Jer. 22:11-12), came true with solemn precision, and so did His word about King Jehoiakim (Jer. 22:17-19). The case of King Zedekiah is perhaps even more astonishing, because puzzling details came true so exactly.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

God's eye on His servant

Jeremiah went free. Commentators point to the hand behind the Babylonian king's orders:

We do not doubt that Nebuchadnezzar knew much of this history. He knew what happened in Jerusalem during the siege. Perhaps he even knew the great messages concerning himself. But it was the Lord who made him act as he did. His loving eye was open above His servant, who had served so faithfully.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

And there is a bitter irony in who finally treated him well:

King Zedekiah did not listen to the words of the Lord spoken through the prophet Jeremiah. Neither did his servants or the people of the land (Jer. 37:2). Instead, they put him in prison. He only got his freedom when the city fell. The king of Babylon treated him better than the king of his own people, whom he served so faithfully. This is often the case with true servants of the Lord.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Said. God announced the disaster through His prophet long before the armies came. His words then came true "with solemn precision," detail by detail.

- Refused. Judah heard the way of escape — submit and live — and called it treason. Unbelief resists God's chastening; faith bows to it.

- Done. The officer's verdict is the whole book in one line: God warned, God acted, and He acted because of their sins.

- Confessed. A man with no share in God's blessing can state the truth once the judgment is over and he stands on the winning side. True words are not the same as a changed heart.

- Kept. The nation lost everything. The one man who had believed God went free, because the Lord moved a foreign king to protect him. His eye was open above His servant the whole time.

Jeremiah 40:4 · Darby

And now, behold, I loose thee this day from the chains that are upon thy hand. If it seem good in thy sight to come with me to Babylon, come, and I will keep mine eye upon thee; but if it seem ill unto thee to come with me to Babylon, forbear. See, all the land is before thee whither it seemeth good and right in thy sight to go, thither go.

The man who unlocks Jeremiah's chains is not a fellow Israelite. He is the commander of the army that has just taken Jerusalem. His offer is simple: come to Babylon under my protection, or go anywhere you choose in the ruined land.

The chains come off

The order to treat Jeremiah well came from the Babylonian king himself. One writer traces the kindness back further — past the king, to the God whose eye was on His servant.

And if the poor were remembered, the prophet was likewise treated with great kindness. The Babylonian king commanded: "Take him, and look after him well, and do him no harm; but do to him just as he tells you." Nebuzaradan found the great man of God in the prison. The princes had to come and take him out of the prison house of humiliation. What an exaltation! We do not doubt that Nebuchadnezzar knew much of what happened in Jerusalem during the siege. He may even have known the great messages about himself. But it was the Lord who made him act as he did. His loving eye was open above His servant, who had served so faithfully.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Honoured by foreigners, hated at home

The people who imprisoned Jeremiah were his own. The men who now treat him with respect are the invaders.

Jeremiah laboured and testified. But his bitter lot was this: his worst enemies were among the people he loved and pitied and reproved so deeply. Their unbelief in the Lord's word came from a will that rebelled against the Lord Himself. It always does, whatever men say or boast. Nebuchadnezzar and his servants shone in honouring Jeremiah. What a sharp contrast with the priests, the false prophets, and even kings Jehoiakim and Zedekiah!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two roads

Jeremiah was an old man by now, and the two roads in front of him could hardly have been more different.

Jeremiah is now reaching the end of his public ministry. He is probably at least sixty years old. Two choices are placed before him. He may go to Babylon. There he can enjoy the king's favours. There he will find his friends Daniel, Ezekiel, and other captives taken away earlier. And there he can spend the rest of his life in relative quiet. On the other hand, he may remain with the poor of the land in Palestine and carry on a ministry among them. People will probably receive it no better than his earlier prophesying. Even so, on God's part it will still be a last encouragement for these desolate remains of Israel.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Why he stayed

Jeremiah turned Babylon down. Kelly says the reason was love, not duty — and that his staying pointed to the land's future.

But Jeremiah had no heart for Chaldea, whatever attractions might seem to be there. He preferred to suffer in the land with the lowest people that men had left behind… Staying in the scene of their humiliation was an act of love. It was a pledge of restoration.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The right place to stand

The few left behind had nothing impressive about them. But the ground they stood on mattered.

God shows special favour to Jeremiah. He knows how to deliver His faithful servants in the worst of times (Jer. 39:11-14). Jeremiah has complete liberty to go where he pleases (Jer. 40:1-5). But, gracious and faithful man that he was, he chooses to remain with the poor few who were in the right place (Jer. 40:6). Despite all that had happened, this feeble remnant were in their right place in the Lord's land. Many were drawn to them, sought them out and joined them, and received much blessing (Jer. 40:7-12).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same offer, made to us

André puts the same open road in front of a young person choosing what to do with life.

Nebuzaradan says to Jeremiah: "See, the whole land is before you; go wherever you think it good and right to go." Doesn't a young man face almost the same situation when he is about to choose a career or a profession? At the end of his high school or college years, various options open up to him. Which is the path that the Lord wants for him? His parents may advise him. An experienced believer may give an opinion. Yet the decision is still the young believer's own, made with the Lord's help: how he will spend the main part of his life.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Summary

- Chains — the enemy commander unlocked the prophet's chains. It was the Lord who moved him to do it.

- Contrast — the Babylonians honoured Jeremiah. His own priests, prophets and kings had jailed him.

- Choice — Babylon offered quiet, safety and the company of Daniel and Ezekiel. The ruined land offered a hard ministry among people who would not listen.

- Heart — he had no heart for Babylon. He stayed out of love, and his staying was a pledge of restoration.

- Us — the same open road faces a young believer choosing a career. Others may advise; the choice is ours to make with the Lord.

Jeremiah 40:5 · Darby

And while he had not yet given answer; [he said,] Yea, go back to Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan, whom the king of Babylon hath appointed over the cities of Judah, and abide with him in the midst of the people; or go wheresoever it seemeth right in thy sight to go. And the captain of the body-guard gave him provisions and a present, and let him go.

Jerusalem lay in ruins, and Jeremiah — who had warned of it for years — stood in chains among the captives bound for Babylon. The captain of the guard set him free and put two roads before him, and this verse tells us how the prophet chose.

Two Roads

One writer weighs the two roads open to a prophet near the end of his work:

Jeremiah is now reaching the end of his public ministry. He is probably at least sixty years old. Two choices lie before him. He may go to Babylon. There he can enjoy the king's favour. There he will find his friends Daniel, Ezekiel, and other captives taken away earlier. And there he can spend the rest of his life in relative peace. On the other hand, he may stay with the poor of the land in Palestine and serve them there. His ministry will likely be received no better than his earlier preaching. Still, on God's part, it will bring one last encouragement to these desolate remains of Israel.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

An Answer Without Words

Older translations open the verse with "while he had not yet given answer" (DARBY). One writer reads that silence as the prophet's answer:

Jeremiah stays silent; "he had not yet given an answer." Nebuzaradan surely expects him to welcome the attractive offer to settle in Babylon with thanks. The prophet's silence tells him the offer is refused. So he urges Jeremiah to go to Gedaliah, or to "go wherever you think it right to go" (40:5). He gives him provisions and a gift, and sends him away. Jeremiah goes to Gedaliah and stays "with him among the people" left in the land. He would rather stay with the poor of the people of God in their deep poverty than enjoy the favours of the king of Babylon.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Why He Stayed

Another writer names the motive behind the choice, and sees a promise in it:

But Jeremiah had no heart for Babylon, whatever attractions it might seem to hold. He chose to suffer in the land with the lowliest of those left behind… It was love that kept him in the place of their humiliation; it was a pledge of restoration.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Gedaliah Was

The verse names Gedaliah as Babylon's appointed governor. His father had already saved Jeremiah once, and that history shaped how Babylon treated the prophet:

Nebuchadnezzar puts Gedaliah the son of Ahikam over the people left in the land to tend the vines and work the fields. This Ahikam had saved Jeremiah in the days of Jehoiakim, when Jeremiah had prophesied against Jerusalem, as Urijah the prophet had done (Jer. 26:24). No doubt what Ahikam did influenced the king of Babylon, who respected and protected Jeremiah. Gedaliah lived at Mizpah, a fortified city that Asa, king of Judah, had built with the stones of Ramah (1 Kings 15:22).

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Right Place, Wrong Hearts

The chapters that follow show what those left in the land were really like:

Chapters 40-41 expose the mistake of thinking that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some higher standing. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person only opens us to bad behaviour and to godless hypocrisy, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted with deceit.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Choices in Scripture

One writer sets this choice beside other choices in Scripture:

The Word of God speaks of several choices. Abraham is content with whatever land Lot does not want, so he invites his nephew to choose first. Instead of leaving the first choice to his uncle, Lot lifts up his eyes and looks at the plain of Sodom. We know the rest of his life. As for Moses, the letter to the Hebrews confirms that by faith he chose "rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin" (Heb. 11:25)… Mary "has chosen the good portion, which will not be taken away from her," the place at the feet of Jesus.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The same writer applies this to a young person choosing work, to the choice of a wife, and to where a believer settles for fellowship — choices "not made in the head, but in the heart."

Summary

- Offer — Babylon set two paths before Jeremiah: comfort and favour there, or hardship among the poor left in the land.

- Silence — He gave no answer, and his silence was the answer; the officer understood, supplied him, and let him go.

- Choice — He had no heart for Babylon. He chose to suffer with the lowliest of those left behind.

- Love — Staying in the place of their humiliation was love. One writer calls it a pledge of restoration.

- Caution — The right place is not enough. Those left in the land were not right with the right Person, and they acted with deceit.

Jeremiah 40:6 · Darby

And Jeremiah came unto Gedaliah the son of Ahikam to Mizpah, and abode with him among the people that remained in the land.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jeremiah 40:7 · Darby

And all the captains of the forces that were in the fields, they and their men, heard that the king of Babylon had appointed Gedaliah the son of Ahikam over the land, and had committed unto him men, and women, and children, and of the poor of the land, of them that had not been carried away captive to Babylon.

Jerusalem has fallen, the king is gone, and Babylon has installed Gedaliah over the handful of people left in Judah. Here the news reaches the armed men still out in the open country. What happens next turns on how they answer it.

The chapter this verse opens

One commentator reads Jeremiah 40 as the start of a new section. What follows is not recovery but breakdown.

This is the first of a series of chapters. They show the disorder and moral confusion that ruled among the Jews left behind in or near the land. Babylon had carried the rest away captive. Judgment by the hand of man has no softening effect on those who slight the word of God. We shall find that those who would not bow to the Lord's chastening are false and treacherous in how they deal with their brothers.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The poor left in the land

Babylon handed Gedaliah men, women, children, and the poorest of the land, and saw nothing in them worth carrying away. One writer saw far more in them.

Nevertheless the clearing out was not complete. The poor did not fail in the land; some were left in it. The foreigner thought little of it, but they were a pledge that a poor remnant would return. They pledged a nation yet to be poor in spirit, when God brings back the captivity of His people. Then Jacob shall rejoice and Israel shall be glad.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The wisdom of bowing to Babylon

One writer traces where the news took these captains, and why bowing to Babylon was wisdom and not surrender.

When people learned that Gedaliah had been made governor, officers of the armies and their men, who had scattered from Judah, came to Mizpah, where Gedaliah lived. Among them were some prominent men, especially Ishmael and Johanan. Gedaliah planned to stay in the land and to be subject to the king of Babylon. He took an oath to this effect before these men, and required them also to serve Nebuchadnezzar. This was the wise thing to do, for God had brought them down and rebellion would have been rebellion against God. So too in Christendom. Because of the sad failure in testimony, God has allowed confusion — the meaning of the name Babylon — to take open possession of the church. It is only right that we bow to the shame of our confusion. We should not expect to return to the bright early days of the Church at Pentecost.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Another writer states what submission would have secured, and what they chose instead.

If at this last hour this remnant had submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar, peace would have reigned in the land. These few who remained would have held it. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no idea of trusting in the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A gathering with real blessing in it

Jeremiah was free to go wherever he wanted. Where he chose to settle says a great deal about this small, poor group.

Jeremiah had full liberty to go where he pleased (Jer. 40:1-5). But, gracious and faithful man that he was, he chose to stay with the poor few who were in the right place (Jer. 40:6). Despite all that had happened, this feeble remnant were in their right place in the Lord's land. The remnant drew many; they sought it out, joined it, and got much blessing (Jer. 40:7-12).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A return without God in it

The next verse names these captains one by one. They came with their men, and it looked like a reunion. One writer sees the flaw in it.

Everything, however, was out of order. The return of the scattered captains and their forces counted for nothing, because the Lord was not at all in their thoughts. And there is a strange reversal here: the governor swears to them, not they to him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Right place, wrong hearts

Within months Ishmael, one of the captains who came to Mizpah, murdered Gedaliah. One writer reads chapters 40 and 41 together and asks what the right place is worth.

Chapters 40-41 expose the mistake of thinking that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to the godless hypocrisy shown here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Left — Babylon spared the poorest. Their presence in the land was a quiet pledge that God would bring His people back.

- Gathered — News of Gedaliah's appointment drew the captains out of the fields. Jews came home from Moab, Ammon, and Edom, and many found real blessing.

- Submitted — Bowing to Babylon was obedience, not defeat, because God Himself had brought them down. Those who bowed would have kept the land in peace.

- Empty — The reunion counted for nothing, because the Lord was not in their thoughts. Even the oath ran backwards: the governor swore to them.

- Exposed — The right place is no safeguard without being right with God. Within months one of these captains murdered the governor.

Jeremiah 40:8 · Darby

And they came to Gedaliah to Mizpah; even Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, and Johanan and Jonathan the sons of Kareah, and Seraiah the son of Tanhumeth, and the sons of Ephai the Netophathite, and Jezaniah the son of a Maachathite, they and their men.

Jerusalem has fallen. The king of Babylon has made Gedaliah governor over what is left of the nation. Verse 8 lists the army officers who came in from the countryside to Mizpah. One name on that list belongs to the man who would murder the governor.

A land without order

The chapters that follow the fall of the city are not a story of recovery. They record what happened to the poor who were left behind.

Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44 show us the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land, or near it. Most of their fellow countrymen had been carried captive to Babylon. Jeremiah becomes their helper and brings them the word of the Lord. But he finds among them the greatest unbelief… Now even the little remnant, the poor left in the land where Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Men out of the fields

These captains and their men had been scattered across the fields. Their arrival at the governor's town looks like safety in numbers.

But the people of God can never be a place of ease. Least of all can they give security, except where faith looks straight to the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The name of the town they gathered at means:

Watch-tower

Modernised from J. B. JacksonOriginal wording

The name at the head of the list

The list names Ishmael the son of Nethaniah first. Here is what he went on to do.

Son of Nethaniah, of the royal line, though which family is not known. His cunning and ferocity show he was unworthy of a throne. He betrayed Gedaliah and killed him. The king of Babylon had made Gedaliah governor over the cities of Judah. Ishmael killed all the Jews who were with him at Mizpah too. He followed up this crime with the cruel and treacherous murder of eighty men from Shechem, Shiloh and Samaria. They were bringing gifts to the temple, and he spared only ten. He then carried off everyone left in Mizpah and set out to cross over to the Ammonites. But Johanan the son of Kareah, and those with him, rescued the captives. Ishmael escaped and is never heard of again.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A ruined country does not produce humble men.

But sin ruins everything, everywhere. Ambition and scheming, treachery and violence can work in a flattened Judea. They work there as surely as in victorious Babylon — and more painfully. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as the good. Wickedness does not have to wait long for an opportunity, even when it has no excuse to cover its shame. A wicked Jew lends himself to the plans of a pagan neighbour, jealous of any order or easing of sorrow in the land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A gathering that counted for nothing

The verse records a reunion. It looks like the start of a new community.

Everything, though, was out of order. The return of the scattered captains and their forces counted for nothing, because the Lord was not in their thoughts at all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One man, two names

One captain in this list appears under a different name in 2 Kings 25:23. The two names belong to the same man.

Son of Hoshaiah, a Maachathite, and a captain among those left in the land by the king of Babylon, 2 Kings 25:23. Called Jezaniah in Jeremiah 40:8 and Jeremiah 42:1.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Right place, wrong heart

These men stayed in the land while others went to Babylon. Staying did not make them better.

Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea. A remnant in the land — in the right place — does not therefore have some superior standing. To be in the right place, without being right with the right Person, only exposes us to bad behaviour. It exposes us to the godless hypocrisy shown here. They had God's prophet among them, and they pretended to value his word. Even so, they acted deceitfully. To call on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety. To that end the Holy Spirit of God is here to lift Him high before the eyes of our faith.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Place. They gathered at Mizpah, the "watch-tower" — the right spot on the map, with no one watching.

- People. Soldiers came in from the fields. A gathering counts for nothing when the Lord is not in their thoughts.

- Poison. Ishmael's name heads the list; ambition and scheming work in a flattened Judea as surely as in victorious Babylon.

- Pretence. The right place counts for nothing without being right with the right Person.

- Point. Among God's people there is no place of ease — security comes only where faith looks straight to the Lord.

Jeremiah 40:9 · Darby

And Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan swore unto them and to their men, saying, Fear not to serve the Chaldeans dwell in the land, and serve the king of Babylon, and it shall be well with you.

Jerusalem has fallen. Most of the people have been carried off to Babylon. The conqueror has appointed a governor, Gedaliah, who now gathers the scattered army captains at Mizpah and puts them under oath. His words sound like surrender. Yet commentators treat them as the safe path God had left open. Why could life under a foreign king ever be called "well"?

The Oath and Who Swore It

Notice which way the oath runs. The man in power binds himself to the men who came to him:

A strange inversion is seen in the governor swearing to them, not they to him... Nothing could be more conciliatory than the governor's words nor more sincere than his ways. For he was content to do his duty to the conqueror in the difficult condition of the land, but to serve the people as far as he was able.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Serving Babylon Was the Right Course

The verse names one rule two ways: serve the Chaldeans, serve the king of Babylon. The order not to fear that service only makes sense if the rule came from God. On that reading the offer was real, and refusing it cost the people the land:

If at this last hour this remnant had submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar, peace would have reigned in the land. The few who remained would have kept it. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no idea of trusting in Jehovah.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Behind this lies a simple rule:

As has been said: "In a day of ruin faith always recognises the chastening of God and bows to it. Unbelief always resists."

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

A Real Mercy, Quickly Spoiled

The oath gave the land a moment of real mercy. It did not last:

So there might have been a state of things, far from bright certainly, but by no means without mercy from the Lord for the poor in the land. But sin ruins everything everywhere. Ambition and intrigue, treachery and violence can work in fallen Judea as surely as in victorious Babylon — and they hurt more there.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One man's jealousy brought the whole arrangement down:

Jealousy, however, will spoil everything. A certain man of royal blood named Ishmael evidently thought that he should have been appointed governor. And so he kills Gedaliah along with all the Jews with him and the Chaldean men of war that had been left there by the king of Babylon.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The Warning He Ignored

Gedaliah was told what was coming, and he brushed it aside:

God did not fail to give timely and full warning of the danger hanging over Gedaliah. He was unwise and careless to ignore it. But a good man does not like to hear evil. Feeling nothing but kindness toward others, he is slow to believe the malice of those he had only tried to serve.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Being in the Right Place Is Not Enough

Those who took the oath stayed in the land, which was the right place to be. That did not make them right people:

Chapters 40-41 expose for us the false idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — necessarily has some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to hypocrisy such as we see illustrated here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Lesson Carried Forward

One writer carries Gedaliah's choice over to the church today:

Gedaliah decided to stay in the land and to be subject to the king of Babylon. He took an oath to this effect before these men, and required them to serve Nebuchadnezzar too. This was the wise thing to do, for God had brought them down and rebellion would have been rebellion against God. The same is true in Christendom. Because of the sad failure in testimony, God has allowed confusion (the meaning of Babylon) to take hold of the church in public view. It is only right that we bow to the shame of our confusion.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- The yoke — Gedaliah's oath told the captains to accept Babylon's rule. Commentators read that yoke as God's own chastening. Refusing it would have been rebellion against God, not just against Nebuchadnezzar.

- The promise — "it shall be well with you" was a real offer. Had the people submitted, peace would have reigned and the few left would have kept the land.

- The governor — Gedaliah bound himself by oath to the men who came to him. He did his duty to the conqueror and served his own people as far as he could.

- The failure — being in the right place proved nothing. The prophet lived among them, and they still acted deceitfully. Gedaliah ignored the warning, and jealousy spoiled everything.

- The lesson — where testimony has failed and confusion has taken hold, the path is the same. Bow to the shame instead of resisting the hand that brought it.

Jeremiah 40:10 · Darby

And as for me, behold, I dwell at Mizpah, to stand before the Chaldeans, who will come unto us; and ye, gather wine, and summer fruits, and oil, and put [them] in your vessels, and dwell in your cities which ye have taken.

Jerusalem has fallen, and the king of Babylon has put Gedaliah in charge of the few people left in Judah. His orders — gather the harvest, store it, stay in your towns — raise a hard question: can a broken people find peace inside the judgment that broke them?

The governor's offer

Gedaliah's arrangement splits the work. He will live at Mizpah and face the Chaldeans — the Babylonians now ruling the land — on their behalf. Their part is to gather the harvest, store it, and live in the towns they hold. One writer weighs the governor's character and the pledge he gave.

There is a strange reversal here: the governor swears to them, not they to him. … Nothing could be more reassuring than the governor's words, nor more sincere than his ways. The land was in a distressing condition. He was content to do his duty to the conqueror, but also to serve the people as far as he could.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Serving Babylon, bowing to God

Jeremiah had urged surrender to Babylon all through his ministry. It cost him his reputation. Verse 10 turns that same counsel into daily routine.

God meant their exile to be for their eventual good. This is a very important point. In a day of ruin faith always recognises the chastening of God and bows to it. Unbelief always resists, and thinks of its resistance as patriotism or perhaps religion. That is why the men of Judah thought Jeremiah was a very false Jew. He always advised them to submit to the king of Babylon. They thought themselves much better Jews, because they were willing to fight against the king of Babylon.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What was at stake shows up later. The people abandoned this settled life and ran to Egypt.

God had placed the Chaldean king over them. If they had stayed quietly in the land under his authority, they would have survived. But they chose human policy, and thought it safer to go down into Egypt, when in fact it proved to be the opposite.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A real harvest, not a token one

The command was not empty. The verses that follow report that the fruit came in, and in quantity.

For this poor remnant there was a break of several months. They gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance (Jer. 40:12). They even seem to have honoured the worship of the Lord again, at a time when the temple lay completely destroyed and ruined. At least there was a "house of Jehovah" where those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The fruit was not all that came in. People came too.

Despite everything that had happened, this feeble remnant were in their right place in Jehovah's land. Many others were drawn to them. They sought out the remnant, joined them, and received much blessing.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Right place, wrong hearts

Here the writers differ in emphasis. Where one sees blessing in the remnant's position, another warns that the position on its own guarantees nothing.

Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must therefore have some superior qualification. Suppose we are in the right place but not right with the right Person. That will only expose us to bad behaviour and hypocrisy, as this passage shows. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully. … Ishmael killed Gedaliah and those who were with him, and fled with the rest. He added to his guilt by killing a company of worshippers on their way to the house of the Lord.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Jeremiah's choice to stay

Babylon offered the prophet a comfortable life, and he turned it down. He stayed with the people told to pick fruit in a ruined country.

Jeremiah had no heart for Chaldea, whatever attractions might seem to be there. He preferred to suffer in the land with the lowest of those whom man had left behind. … It was love that made him stay in the scene of their humiliation; it was a pledge of restoration.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That choice is read as a pattern for anyone tempted to leave a small and unimpressive gathering for somewhere more rewarding.

He prefers to stay with the poor of the people of God in their destitution rather than enjoy the favours of the king of Babylon. Perhaps there is not much to attract you in your own meeting — not many spiritual gifts, not an abundance of warm fellowship. But the Lord promises to be in the midst of two or three gathered to His name. If He fulfils that promise by His presence, is that not the place where you should stay and, depending on Him, try to contribute some spiritual blessing?

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Summary

- Bow. Faith recognises God's chastening and bows to it. Unbelief resists, and calls its resistance loyalty.

- Stay. Those who stayed under the authority God had placed over them would have been safe. Those who made their own plan and fled to Egypt were not.

- Gather. Submission was not idleness. Wine, summer fruits and oil came in richly, and worship revived among a people with no temple left.

- Attract. Scattered Jews heard where the remnant was and came back to join them, and received much blessing.

- Beware. The right place is not enough. Without being right with the right Person, this same remnant turned to treachery and murder.

Jeremiah 40:11 · Darby

Likewise all the Jews that were in Moab, and among the children of Ammon and in Edom, and that were in all the lands, heard that the king of Babylon had left a remnant in Judah, and that he had appointed over them Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan;

When Jerusalem fell, some Jews escaped over the borders into Moab, Ammon, Edom and other lands. Now they hear that Babylon has left a remnant in Judah, with a governor from their own people over them.

The news that travelled

What drew these scattered Jews back was not a royal decree but the character of the man Babylon had put in charge. One writer describes the governor's manner:

Nothing could be more conciliatory than the governor's words, nor more sincere than his ways. He was content to do his duty to the conqueror in the distressing condition of the land, but to serve the people to the utmost of his power. And this had its effect.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Gedaliah was

The verse names Gedaliah's father and grandfather. That family history mattered:

Nebuchadnezzar establishes Gedaliah the son of Ahikam over the people left in the land to be vinedressers and labourers. This Ahikam had saved Jeremiah in the days of Jehoiakim, when, like Urijah the prophet, he had prophesied against Jerusalem (Jer. 26:24). No doubt this action had influenced the king of Babylon, who respected and protected Jeremiah. Gedaliah lived at Mizpah, a strong city that Asa, king of Judah, had built with the stones of Ramah (1 Kings 15:22). Jeremiah went there. So did all those from the surrounding regions who had escaped, along with the poor people left in the land. They came to seek the protection of Gedaliah, this noble lieutenant of the king of Babylon. He reassured the people. He swore to them that they had nothing to fear in accepting their servitude to the Chaldeans.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Mercy in the ruins

They were coming back to a wrecked country under a foreign power. One writer measures the mercy still in that scene, and what ruined it:

So there might have been a state of things, far from bright certainly, but by no means without mercy from the Lord for the poor in the land. But sin ruins everything, everywhere. Ambition and intrigue, treachery and violence can work in a flattened Judea as surely as in victorious Babylon — and more painfully. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as the good. Their own deep debts to a good man can sometimes make their purpose even worse.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A short season of plenty

The next verse records what the homecoming produced:

For this poor remnant there was a respite of several months. They gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance (Jer. 40:12). People even seem to have honoured the worship of the Lord again. And that was at a time when the temple lay in complete ruins. At least there was a "house of Jehovah" to which those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What the returning crowd was really like

It is easy to read this gathering as a hopeful revival. The chapters that follow show otherwise:

Jeremiah 40 to 44 shows the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land or near it. By then Babylon had carried most of their brothers away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper, bringing them the word of Jehovah. But he finds among them the greatest unbelief… Even the little remnant — the poor left in the land, among whom Jeremiah remained — were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The lesson for us

These men came back to the right country, with the right governor, and with a prophet of God living among them. That was still not enough:

Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualification. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person only exposes us to bad behaviour and hypocrisy, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, they acted deceitfully — though they pretended to value his word. To call on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety. For that purpose the Holy Spirit of God is here, to exalt Him before the eyes of our faith.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- News gathers them. Word that Babylon had left a remnant, and set Gedaliah over it, travelled as far as Moab, Ammon and Edom. It brought scattered Jews home.

- Kindness gathers them. Gedaliah served the people sincerely and gently. That, not force, "had its effect."

- Mercy meets them. The scene was far from bright, yet it was "by no means without mercy from the Lord for the poor in the land."

- Harvest crowns it — briefly. A few months of wine and summer fruits in abundance, with worship honoured again. Then jealousy and murder ended it.

- The heart undoes it. They were in the right place, with the prophet among them. But "God was not really in their thoughts." The right place is no safety without the right Person.

Jeremiah 40:12 · Darby

and all the Jews returned out of all the places whither they had been driven, and came to the land of Judah to Gedaliah, unto Mizpah, and gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance.

After Jerusalem fell, Babylon's king put Gedaliah in charge at Mizpah, and scattered Jews came home to him from Moab, Ammon and Edom. The ruined land then gave them a rich harvest — so why such plenty for a people who would soon throw it away?

Why the Scattered Came Home

The harvest begins with the man in charge. One writer ties the return of the scattered Jews to the way the new governor spoke and acted.

Nothing could have been more friendly than the governor's words, and nothing more sincere than his ways. He was content to do his duty to the conqueror while the land was in such distress, and at the same time to serve the people with all his power. And this had its effect.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Breathing Space of Months

The abundance was not a new era. It came inside a short pause, and something else revived in that pause too.

For this poor remnant there was a break of several months. They gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance (Jer. 40:12). It even seems that they held the worship of the Lord in honour again, at a time when the temple lay in complete ruins. At least there was a "house of the Lord" to go up to, for those who grieved over Israel's condition.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Mercy in a Wrecked Country

Nothing here is glorious. The temple is in ruins and the survivors live under a foreign king. Yet the full baskets still counted for something, and what wrecked it next was not Babylon.

So things in the land could have settled down. That situation would have been far from bright, of course, but in no way without mercy from the Lord for the poor. But sin ruins everything, everywhere. Ambition and scheming, treachery and violence can work in a crushed Judea just as surely as in a victorious Babylon, and they hurt more there. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as what is good, and when they owe a good man much, that can make their aim even worse. Wickedness does not have to wait long for its opportunity.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Was Inside the People

The verse shows busy hands. The chapters around it show what these same people carried inside.

The poor were left in the land, and Jeremiah stayed among them. Even this little remnant was full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Right Place Is Not Enough

These returning Jews did what looked best. They came back to Judah rather than stay in Moab or Ammon, and they prospered there. It still did not save them.

Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea. Being a remnant in the land — in the right place — does not by itself make anyone better qualified. It is possible to be in the right place and still not be right with the right Person. That only leaves us open to bad behaviour and shameless hypocrisy, as we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word. Still they acted deceitfully. To call upon the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What They Gave Up

The plenty of this verse was the life God was offering them. Within months Gedaliah was murdered, and the survivors ran to Egypt instead of staying under the arrangement God had allowed.

Had they remained quietly in the land subject to the authority of the Chaldean king whom God had placed over them, they would have been preserved. But they, choosing human policy, thought it was safer to go down into Egypt, whereas it proved to be the opposite.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Gift. A people who had just lost everything gathered wine and summer fruits in great abundance. Even a wrecked land was not without mercy from the Lord for the poor.

- Gathering. Gedaliah served both his conqueror and his people. His words and ways drew the scattered Jews home from Moab, Ammon and Edom.

- Grace-period. The plenty lasted a few months. In that break, people even honoured the worship of the Lord again, with the temple in ruins.

- Gap. Full hands, empty hearts. The same gatherers were "full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason," and God was "not really in their thoughts."

- Giveaway. The right place is not the same as being right with the right Person. These same people trusted themselves instead of God, and went down to Egypt.

Jeremiah 40:13 · Darby

And Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces that were in the fields, came to Gedaliah unto Mizpah,

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jeremiah 40:14 · Darby

and said unto him, Dost thou indeed know that Baalis the king of the children of Ammon hath sent Ishmael the son of Nethaniah to smite thee to death? But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam believed them not.

Babylon has left Gedaliah as governor over the survivors in Judah. Then a warning comes: Baalis of Ammon has sent a man to kill him, and Gedaliah will not believe it. What do you do with an unwelcome report from a source you do not trust? And what does it cost to get that judgment wrong?

The Land After the Fall

After Jerusalem fell, a small group was left in the land. The picture is not a pretty one.

Jeremiah 40 to 44 shows us the lawlessness and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land, or near it, after most of their people had been carried off to Babylon... Now even the small group of poor people left in the land, where Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Governor Worth Keeping

Gedaliah's father had already stood by the prophet Jeremiah. Under Gedaliah, scattered people came home.

This Ahikam had saved Jeremiah in the days of Jehoiakim... Jeremiah went there, and so did all those from the surrounding regions who had escaped, along with the poor people who were left. They came to seek the protection of Gedaliah, this noble deputy of the king of Babylon. He calmed their fears, swearing to them that they had nothing to fear in serving the Chaldeans.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

His words to the returning captains were generous, and people came back to the land because of him.

Nothing could be more conciliatory than the governor's words nor more sincere than his ways. For he was content to do his duty to the conqueror in the distressful condition of the land, but to serve the people to the utmost of his power. And this had its effect.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Ishmael Was Sent

Baalis, a foreign king, resents the new order in Judah. Ishmael, a Jew, is willing to serve his plan.

But sin ruins everything, everywhere. Ambition and scheming, treachery and violence, can work in a crushed Judea just as well as in a victorious Babylon — and they hurt more there. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as the good; and the debt they owe to a good man can make their plan even worse. Wickedness does not wait long for its chance, even when it has no excuse to hide its shame. A wicked Jew gives himself to the plans of a pagan neighbour, who resents any order or easing of sorrow in the land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Warning Enough

God did not leave Gedaliah in the dark. The verse says he would not believe them — the warning came from more than one man. That is what makes his refusal a fault and not just bad luck.

So God did not fail to give Gedaliah warning of the danger hanging over him, and the warning came in time and was enough. It was unwise and careless of him to brush it aside. A good man does not love to hear evil. Feeling nothing but kindness toward others, he is slow to believe there is malice in men he has only tried to serve. Still, in this case it was a fault. He held a public and responsible position. His life mattered greatly, both for the help of the poor and as a safeguard against the suspicion or displeasure of the Chaldeans. Witnesses in plenty, more than two or three, told him of the plot between the king of the Ammonites and Ishmael against his life. Gedaliah should have looked into it further and been on his guard.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Suspect Messenger

Gedaliah faced a real problem. The man who brought the warning was himself unreliable, and he offered to get rid of Ishmael. That did not make the report false.

It is not that Johanan was much better than Ishmael. As later events show, he had no real faith in God's word, and he hardened himself in pride and rebellion of heart. It may be that Gedaliah knew there was little to choose between the two men, and so turned down the good warning as well as Johanan's bad offer to get rid of Ishmael... But in that evil day it was not wise or right to brush aside a report, even one from a suspect source. Had Gedaliah waited on God, he would have been slower to accuse the one of lying or to clear the other.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Right Place, Wrong Person

Those left in the land might think their position made them better than the exiles. These chapters take that idea apart.

Chapters 40-41 show up the mistake of thinking that a group left in the land — in the right place — must have something better about them. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only leave us open to bad behaviour and to the ungodly hypocrisy we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully. Calling on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. More than two or three witnesses brought Gedaliah the news in time. The danger was never hidden from him.

- Unwilling. A good man hates to hear evil. Kindness made him slow to believe the worst of a man he had only tried to serve. Sincerity is not the same as safety.

- Responsible. His life mattered to the poor and shielded them from the suspicion of the Chaldeans. Carelessness here was a fault, not a private matter.

- Waiting. Had he waited on God, he would have been slower to call one man a liar and slower to clear the other. Neither deserved a quick verdict.

- Rooted. Being in the right place is no substitute for being right with the right Person. Calling on the Lord out of a pure heart is our safety.

Jeremiah 40:15 · Darby

And Johanan the son of Kareah spoke to Gedaliah in Mizpah secretly, saying, Let me go, I pray thee, and I will smite Ishmael the son of Nethaniah and no man shall know it why should he take thy life, and all they of Judah who are gathered unto thee be scattered, and the remnant of Judah perish?

Judah lies in ruins, and Babylon has made Gedaliah governor over the poor who are left in the land. Johanan now takes him aside with a secret offer: let me kill Ishmael first, and no one will ever know. Two hard questions meet in this one verse. Should you trust a warning that comes from a doubtful man? And may one murder be done to stop another?

after_note: none

The offer and the refusal

Johanan argues from the good of everyone gathered around Gedaliah: kill Ishmael, or the last of Judah is scattered. But the man making that argument was no better than the man he wanted dead. Kelly suggests Gedaliah saw little to choose between the two, and so threw out the warning along with the offer:

Johanan was not much better than Ishmael. As later events show, he had no real faith in God's word and hardened himself in pride and rebellion of heart. It is possible that Gedaliah knew there was little to choose between them, and so he rejected the good warning as well as the bad offer to get rid of Ishmael... But in that evil day it was not wise or right to despise a report just because it came from a source he had reason to suspect. And Gedaliah, had he waited on God, would have been less quick either to charge the one with lying or to clear the other.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Gedaliah refused

His answer refuses two things at once — the report, and the hand offered to act on it.

Gedaliah, warned by Johanan, one of the captains, of the treachery being planned, refused to believe it and refused to take part in the murder of Ishmael.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why a kind man would not believe it

The refusal came out of his own goodness. But goodness did not excuse him, because of the position he held.

God gave warning of the danger hanging over Gedaliah in good time, and the warning was enough. He was careless and unwise to despise it. But a good man does not like to hear evil. He has nothing but kindness in his own heart toward others, so he is slow to believe in the malice of people he had only tried to help. Still, in this case it was not without fault. He was in a public and responsible position. His life mattered much, both for the help of the poor and as a protection against the suspicion or anger of the Babylonians. Plenty of witnesses, more than two or three, told him of the plot against his life between the king of the Ammonites and Ishmael. Gedaliah should have looked into it further and stood on his guard. But he did not believe them, and soon paid the price of his rashness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The warning was true

Gedaliah answered by charging Johanan with lying. The outcome settled which man had told the truth.

Gedaliah seems to have been a sincere, unsuspecting man... The presence of Ishmael, though, meant Gedaliah's overthrow. Johanan warned him of this, but he treated it as a false suspicion. It was true all the same, and Ishmael killed Gedaliah and those who were with him, and fled with the rest.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Where the safeguard lay

There was a step Gedaliah never took. Grant, writing on one of David's psalms, points to prayer as the safeguard he passed by.

Believers are sometimes deceived by the smooth words and speeches of a deceiver, as Gedaliah was when Ishmael came to him... If Gedaliah had prayed as David did in this psalm, he might have been kept from an early death. We may excuse ourselves from responsibility on the ground that someone deceived us. But if a believer is deceived, it is his own fault, for communion with the Lord will preserve from all deception.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Alert without being suspicious

The lesson cuts both ways. Gedaliah's fault was not thinking well of people. It was refusing to look into a serious charge backed by many witnesses. The opposite error is just as real.

While we are to be watchful, we are not to be suspicious. Gracious, loving care for one another is the very opposite of a restless, prying, meddlesome spirit. We are not to suspect that evil exists without proper ground.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Kelly closes with a prayer that holds both sides together:

May we learn, though in a different way, one that suits the Christian calling, to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. God warned Gedaliah in good time, through more than two or three witnesses. The danger was never hidden from him.

- Refused. He turned down both halves of Johanan's offer. He would not believe the report, and he would not share in killing Ishmael.

- Why. A kind man is slow to believe evil of people he has only tried to help. But kindness did not cancel his duty. His public post made his life matter to many others.

- Cost. What he dismissed as a false suspicion proved true. Ishmael killed him and fled with the rest of the people.

- Safeguard. Had he waited on God, he would have been quicker to inquire and slower to judge either man. Communion with the Lord — not suspicion — is what keeps a believer from being deceived.

Jeremiah 40:16 · Darby

But Gedaliah the son of Ahikam said unto Johanan the son of Kareah, Thou shalt not do this thing; for thou speakest falsely of Ishmael.

The ruined nation had one thing left: a quiet corner of the land, a harvest, and a governor who wanted only their good. Then armed men warned Gedaliah of a plot on his life. In one sentence he dismissed both the warning and the man who brought it.

The moment when mercy was still possible

The situation Gedaliah inherited was not hopeless. People who had escaped captivity were gathering wine and summer fruits under a decent governor. What ruined it was not Babylon but the men in the land.

So there might have been a state of things, far from bright certainly, but by no means without mercy from the Lord for the poor in the land. But sin ruins everything everywhere. Ambition and intrigue, treachery and violence can work in fallen Judea as surely as in victorious Babylon. There they hurt even more. Evil men find nothing so unbearable as the good.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why a good man would not believe it

Gedaliah's refusal grew out of his own goodness. He had only ever wished these men well, so he could not picture one of them wanting him dead. Kelly does not treat that as innocence, though. The warning was clear and repeated, and he owed something to the people depending on him.

God did not fail to give timely and sufficient warning of the danger hanging over Gedaliah... But a good man does not like to hear evil; and having no feeling but kindness toward others, he is slow to believe the malice of those he had only sought to serve. Still, in this case he was not without fault. He held a public and responsible position. His life mattered much, both to help the poor and to guard against the suspicion or displeasure of the Babylonians. Plenty of witnesses, more than two or three, told him of the plot between the king of the Ammonites and Ishmael against his life. Gedaliah should have asked further questions and been on his guard.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two offers, and only one of them refused rightly

Johanan made two proposals: believe the report, and let him quietly kill Ishmael. Gedaliah turned down both together. One writer notes that he "refused to believe it and to have part in the murder of Ishmael" — and refusing a secret assassination was right. The mistake was bundling the warning in with it.

It is not that Johanan was much better than Ishmael... And it is possible that Gedaliah knew there was little to choose between them. So he rejected the good warning along with the bad offer — Johanan's offer to get rid of Ishmael in secret, so that no one would know. But in that evil day it was neither wise nor good to dismiss a report just because it came from a questionable source. Had Gedaliah waited on God, he would have been slower to accuse the one of lying and to clear the other. May we learn, in a way suited to the Christian calling, to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the misjudgement cost

Calling the report a lie did not make it one. The killing that followed reached far past Gedaliah himself.

Gedaliah seems to have been a sincere, unsuspecting man... Johanan warned him of this, but he treated it as a false suspicion (vv. 13-16). It was true all the same. Ishmael killed Gedaliah and those with him. He added to his guilt by killing a group of worshippers on their way to the house of the Lord, and then fled with the rest.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The safeguard he did not use

Kelly points to what was missing: Gedaliah did not wait on God before deciding. Another writer ties the same lesson to a prayer of David, and will not accept being deceived as an excuse.

Sadly, believers are sometimes deceived by the smooth words and speeches of a deceiver, as Gedaliah was when Ishmael came to him... If Gedaliah had prayed as David did in this psalm, he might have been kept from an untimely end. We may excuse ourselves from responsibility on the grounds that someone deceived us. But if a believer is deceived, it is his own fault. Communion with the Lord will preserve from all deception.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

Right place, wrong dependence

This remnant had what the exiles in Babylon did not — the land, the harvest, and the prophet living among them. It saved no one.

Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must somehow have superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to hypocrisy like the kind shown here. The prophet of God was living among them, and they pretended to value his word. Still they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Kindness — Gedaliah could not believe evil of men he had only helped. His goodness became the opening for the plot.

- Kindness untested — plenty of witnesses brought the warning. A man in public office should have asked more questions, not dismissed it.

- Kindness misapplied — he was right to forbid a secret killing. But he threw out the true warning with the wrong remedy.

- Kindness unguarded — had he waited on the Lord, he would have been slower to call one man a liar and clear the other. Communion with God is what keeps us from deception.

- Kindness misplaced — the land, the harvest and the prophet among them guaranteed nothing. Being in the right place is no substitute for being right with the right Person.

Jeremiah 41:1 · Darby

And it came to pass in the seventh month, that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah the son of Elishama, of the royal seed, and [one] of the king's chief men, and ten men with him, came to Gedaliah the son of Ahikam unto Mizpah, and there they ate bread together, in Mizpah.

A man of royal blood shares a meal with the governor of Judah, then kills him at his own table. The details matter: the seventh month, the shared bread, the ten men, Ishmael's royal descent. Commentators read them as a picture of a nation collapsing from the inside.

Where the chapter sits

These chapters follow the Jews left in the land after Babylon carried the rest away:

In Jeremiah 40 to 44 we have the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land, or near it. Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper, bringing them the word of the Lord. But he finds among them the greatest unbelief… now even the little remnant, the poor left in the land among whom Jeremiah remained, were full of jealousy and full of their own plans. They were full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why "of the royal family" is mentioned

Scripture names Ishmael's royal descent, and that detail carries weight:

The Holy Spirit adds a description to Ishmael's name and family that is not meaningless: "of the royal line." Normally, and rightly, that would have guaranteed help to a governor, and support and shelter for the people. But God was forgotten, His judgments as well as His will ignored, and human corruption runs its course where it was least fitting. The ruin of Israel was complete when the royal line sank to the lowest form of cunning, treachery and murder. And the victims were the best of their own people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The motive

One sin lay behind the murder:

Jealousy, however, will spoil everything. A certain man of royal blood named Ishmael evidently thought that he should have been appointed governor. And so he kills Gedaliah along with all the Jews with him and the Chaldean soldiers that had been left there by the king of Babylon.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Killed at his own table

The shared bread makes the crime worse, and it did not stop with Gedaliah:

This was not only jealousy of the good man who fell unsuspectingly at his own table, where he had generously welcomed these agents of wickedness… This royal outlaw had tasted blood and would carry on his reckless course, not caring whom he killed or why.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Striking at an order God had allowed

Submitting to Babylon was not weakness:

Gedaliah was determined to remain in the land and to be subject to the king of Babylon. He took an oath to this effect before these men, and required them to serve Nebuchadnezzar too. This was the wise thing to do, for God had brought them down, and rebellion would have been rebellion against God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why God let the best men fall

The best men died. That looks like pure loss:

Who can doubt that God was pleased to take away Gedaliah, and those who grieved over the desolations of Israel, from the evil that was coming? It was mercy to themselves. It was also a further chastening on the guilty people, high and low: their own countrymen swept away the very men who acted and felt most rightly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Being in the land was not enough

The remnant had the right land and God's prophet living with them. It changed nothing:

Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea. Being a remnant in the land — in the right place — does not by itself give anyone a superior standing. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and false piety, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The day was never forgotten

Israel kept mourning this murder long after the event:

The Lord's answer through Zechariah linked a second fast with the one they had asked about, kept in the seventh month. It seems to have been in memory of the murder of Gedaliah and others, and of the flight of the remnant left in the land into Egypt… The people marked these tragedies with fasting and tears through the seventy years of captivity.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Place. The remnant was in the right land, with God's prophet among them. They were still full of jealousy, treason, deceit and violence. God was not in their thoughts.

- Person. The right place without the right Person leads to bad behaviour and false piety. Standing somewhere good guarantees nothing.

- Pedigree. "Of the royal line" should have meant protection for a governor. Here it sank to cunning and murder. That is how complete the ruin was.

- Position. Gedaliah's oath to serve Babylon was wisdom, because God had brought them down. Striking him down was rebellion against God, not just against a king.

- Providence. The best men fell. For them it was mercy, taken away from the evil that was coming. For a guilty people it was chastening, since their own countrymen did the killing. The nation fasted over that day for seventy years.

Jeremiah 41:2 · Darby

And Ishmael the son of Nethaniah arose, and the ten men that were with him, and smote Gedaliah the son of Ahikam the son of Shaphan with the sword, and killed him, whom the king of Babylon had appointed over the land.

Jerusalem has fallen, and Babylon has left a governor, Gedaliah, over the poor who remain in the land. This verse records how that last fragile arrangement ended: at a shared meal, by the hand of a guest.

The meal before the sword

Verse 1 puts Ishmael and his ten men at Gedaliah's table before verse 2 puts a sword in their hands. One commentator keeps that meal in view when he weighs the crime.

This was not only jealousy against the good man who fell unsuspecting at his own table, where he had welcomed these messengers of evil as guests. Nor was it simply rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon, which broke out at Mizpah against the native governor and the foreign soldiers. The royal criminal had tasted blood. He would carry on his desperate course, not caring whom he killed or why.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Killed by his own royal line

Jeremiah notes that Ishmael came from the royal line. One writer shows why that phrase matters.

It is not a meaningless description when the Holy Spirit adds to Ishmael's name and ancestry the words "of the royal family." Normally this would rightly have been a guarantee of support to a governor, and a strength and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten, His judgments as well as His will ignored, and human corruption runs its course where it was least fitting. Truly the ruin of Israel was complete when the royal line sank into the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The motive behind the blow

Commentators point to two forces working at once. One names the personal grievance.

Jealousy will spoil everything. A certain man of royal blood named Ishmael evidently thought that he should have been appointed governor. And so he kills Gedaliah along with all the Jews with him and the Chaldean men of war left there by the king of Babylon.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Another points past Ishmael to the foreign king who sent him.

This man, however, came with evil purposes, sent by Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, and driven, no doubt, by his own ambition.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The good man who would not listen

Gedaliah did not die for lack of warning.

God did not fail to give timely and adequate warning of the danger hanging over Gedaliah. And he was certainly careless and unwise to have brushed it aside. But a good man does not like to hear evil. His own heart holds nothing but kindness toward others. So he is slow to believe the malice of those he had only tried to help. Still, in this case it was not without fault. He held a public and responsible position. His life mattered a great deal, both for helping the poor and as a safeguard against the suspicion or anger of the Chaldeans.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the murder cost the survivors

The killing did not end with Gedaliah. The survivors ran for Egypt, and one writer names the root of that flight.

Fear is evidence of unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion, even if it is not as obvious. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to run to Egypt. What came of this disobedience, flowing out of distrust, we have yet to learn. What a blessing it is for the believer! He is free to trample on his fears and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The deeper problem was not where they were living.

Chapters 40-41 expose for us the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — automatically has some superior standing. To be in the right place, without being right with the right Person, will only leave us open to bad behaviour and hollow hypocrisy, as this account shows.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The day that became a fast

The murder also left its mark on Israel's calendar.

The Lord adds a fast in the seventh month, which was another fast in memory of the murder of Gedaliah by Ishmael (Jer. 41:1-2). The Lord raises a serious question. Were these fasts out of concern for His glory, or did Israel have selfish motives?

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Yet that mourning is not the last word on the date.

"The fast of the fourth month, and the fast of the fifth, and the fast of the seventh, and the fast of the tenth, shall be to the house of Judah seasons of joy and gladness and cheerful feasts. Therefore love truth and peace." All the feasts named appear to belong to the siege and destruction of Jerusalem, and to what followed.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Table — the sword came from guests he had just fed. The welcome makes the treachery worse, not lighter.

- Warning — Gedaliah heard the plot named and would not believe it. Kindness that refuses to hear evil is still a fault in a man with public responsibility.

- Bloodline — "of the royal family" is no idle phrase. The line that should have sheltered the people produced their killer.

- Flight — fear scattered the survivors toward Egypt, and that kind of fear is unbelief as truly as open rebellion.

- Feast — the day became a fast in the seventh month, yet God's promise is that such days of mourning turn into joy and gladness.

Jeremiah 41:3 · Darby

And Ishmael smote all the Jews that were with him, with Gedaliah, at Mizpah, and the Chaldeans that were found there, the men of war.

The murder of the governor Gedaliah did not end with him. The same sword fell on the men around him at Mizpah, and on the Babylonian soldiers stationed there. How far will treachery run once God is forgotten? And what does it cost a people who strike down the order He had allowed over them?

The land left behind

Babylon did not deport everyone. A small group stayed in the land, and one writer sums up their condition.

In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we see the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land or near it. Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away as captives. Jeremiah becomes their helper, bringing them the word of the Lord. But he finds among them the greatest unbelief... even this little remnant, the poor left in the land where Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy and full of their own plans. They were full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Royal blood turned to murder

Scripture tells us Ishmael was "of the royal family." One writer treats that detail as deliberate. It measures how far the collapse had gone.

The Holy Spirit adds to Ishmael's name and family the words "of the royal seed," and that description means something. Normally, and rightly, royal blood would have guaranteed help to a governor. It would have been a support and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten, and His judgments and His will were slighted. Human corruption takes its course where it was least fitting. The ruin of Israel was complete when the royal seed sank into the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder — and this against the best of their own people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the killing spread

The killing did not stop with Gedaliah. One writer traces it to ambition for Gedaliah's post.

Jealousy, however, will spoil everything. A certain man of royal blood named Ishmael evidently thought that he should have been appointed governor. And so he kills Gedaliah along with all the Jews with him and the Chaldean men of war that had been left there by the king of Babylon.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Yet jealousy does not explain everything that follows. One writer points to a growing taste for killing.

It was not only jealousy of the good man who fell without suspicion at his own table, where he had welcomed these wicked messengers as guests. It was not simple rebellion either, though rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon did break out at Mizpah, against the native governor and the foreign soldiers. This royal criminal had tasted blood, and he would carry on his reckless course, not caring whom he killed or why.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Striking the soldiers Babylon had left

The dead included Babylon's own garrison, the Chaldeans. One writer traces the plot back to a foreign king and to Ishmael's own ambition.

Ishmael came with evil purposes, sent by Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, and pushed, no doubt, by his own ambition... He struck Gedaliah down like a coward, and so rebelled one last time against the king of Babylon's authority. He massacred the governor's followers and the Chaldean warriors who were there.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Ishmael's sword broke a promise the whole group had made.

Gedaliah had decided to stay in the land and to submit to the king of Babylon. He took an oath to this effect before these men, and required them to serve Nebuchadnezzar too. This was the wise thing to do. God had brought them down, so rebelling against Babylon would have meant rebelling against God.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Right place, wrong heart

These were the people who kept the land while others went into exile.

Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. Being in the right place without being right with the right Person only exposes us to bad behaviour and to the hypocrisy we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word, yet they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What the bloodshed produced

After the massacre the people feared what Babylon would do. So they ran toward Egypt, against the prophet's word.

Fear is just as certain a proof of unbelief as bold or treacherous rebellion, even if it is not as obvious. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon and not to flee into Egypt... How blessed for the believer that he may trample on his fears and trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Forgotten — The root of it all is this: "God was not really in their thoughts." Everything else is fruit from that root.

- Jealousy — Ishmael seems to have wanted the governorship himself. That envy killed Gedaliah and everyone standing near him.

- Treachery — Royal descent should have made him the people's shelter; instead corruption ran its course "where it was least fitting."

- Rebellion — Killing Babylon's soldiers threw off the authority God had placed over Judah. To refuse that authority was to refuse Him.

- Fear — The survivors were in the right place but not right with the right Person. They fled to Egypt. Unbelief shows itself in panic as clearly as in violence.

Jeremiah 41:4 · Darby

And it came to pass the second day after he had killed Gedaliah, and no man knew it,

One day had passed since Gedaliah was killed at Mizpah, and no one outside the murderer's circle knew it. That secret gave the killer cover for his next crime, and it raises a question: where was God while the last leaders of His people turned to treachery?

Anarchy Among Those Left Behind

What happened at Mizpah was not one man's private crime. It came out of a general collapse of order.

In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we see the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews who stayed in the land, or near it, after Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper and brings them the word of the Lord, but he finds among them the greatest unbelief… Even the little remnant, the poor left in the land, among whom Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans. They were full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Killer of Royal Blood

Scripture tells us Ishmael came from the royal line. That one detail shows how far the nation had fallen.

The Holy Spirit does not add "of the royal family" to Ishmael's name and kin for nothing. Normally and rightly this would have been a guarantee of help to a governor, and a support and shelter to the people. But they forgot God, and slighted His judgments and His will. Human corruption takes its course where it is least fitting. The ruin of Israel was complete. Its royal line had sunk into the lowest kind of cunning, treachery, and murder — and against the best of their own people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Day Nobody Knew

The hidden murder gave Ishmael a free hand. No one raised an alarm, so he could keep killing — and by now his motive was more than politics.

It was not only jealousy of the good man who fell at his own table, suspecting nothing, after welcoming these agents of evil as guests. It was not simple rebellion either against the conquering king of Babylon, which then broke out against the native governor and the foreign soldiers at Mizpah. This royal killer had tasted blood. He would carry on his reckless course, not caring whom he killed or why.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Worshippers Walking Into a Trap

The men who arrived on that second day were on their way to worship at the ruined temple site. Their devotion was mixed, but real, and it cost them their lives.

It even seems that people honoured the worship of the Lord again, at a time when the temple lay in complete ruin. At least there was a "house of the Lord" to which those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up… On the second day he killed men who had come to seek the Lord. Perhaps they were ignorant and not free from pagan practices, but their hearts were broken.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Mercy Hidden Inside the Horror

The horror had another side. God was taking the godly out of reach of worse evil, and their loss fell on the nation as punishment.

Who can doubt that God chose to take Gedaliah away from the evil to come, along with those who grieved over the ruins of Israel? It was mercy to them. It was also a further chastening on the guilty people, high and low, that the ones who acted and felt best of all should be swept away — and by their own brothers' hands.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Fast That Remembered It

For generations Israel kept a fast in the seventh month because of this murder. The reason they kept it is worth asking about.

The fast of the seventh month was kept on the anniversary of the murder of Gedaliah at Mizpah (Jeremiah 41). But why did they keep these fast days?… It was not for the honour and glory of God. Their own selfish interests were at the bottom of it. Indeed God had never asked them to fast.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Right Place, Wrong Heart

These survivors were in the right place — the land itself. It did them no good.

Chapters 40-41 show up a mistaken idea. Being a remnant in the land — in the right place — does not by itself give anyone superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person is no help. It only leaves us open to bad behaviour and to ungodly hypocrisy, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Secret — One hidden day was all the cover Ishmael needed. No one knew, so the killing went on.

- Seed — The murderer came from the royal line, the family that should have sheltered the people. Israel's ruin was complete.

- Sincere — The men who walked in were mourners on their way to seek the Lord, and they were the ones cut down.

- Spared — God took the godly away from evil still to come. That was mercy to them, and a further chastening on the nation.

- Situated — Being in the right place saved no one. Only being right with the right Person does.

Jeremiah 41:5 · Darby

that there came men from Shechem, from Shiloh, and from Samaria, eighty men, having their beards shaven and their clothes rent, and having cut themselves; with oblations and incense in their hand, to bring them to the house of Jehovah.

Ishmael had just murdered Gedaliah, the governor, and no one knew it yet. The next day eighty mourners came down from the northern towns with offerings for the temple — so why did God let them walk into a killer's hands?

A Murderer Still at Work

These travellers knew nothing of the murder at Mizpah the day before. One commentator looks for Ishmael's motive and finds none left.

It was not only jealousy of the good man who fell at his own table, with no suspicion. There he had welcomed these wicked messengers as guests. Nor was it simple rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon that broke out at Mizpah against the native governor and the foreign soldiers. This royal outlaw had tasted blood. He would keep on his desperate course, not caring whom he killed or why.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Worship at a Burned Temple

The temple in Jerusalem lay in ruins. Even so, these men carried offerings "to present at the temple of the LORD."

People even seem to have honoured the worship of the Lord again, at a time when the temple lay completely destroyed and ruined. At least there was a "house of Jehovah" where those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Shaved Beard and the Torn Clothes

Their appearance was not random. Israel guarded the beard with care, so cutting it was a loud sign of grief.

The Israelites always cultivated the beard and prized it. The law forbade them to "mar the edges" of their beards (Leviticus 19:27). A priest was not to shave off the corner of his beard as a sign of mourning (Leviticus 21:5)… Ezra was in great grief at the sin of the people. He pulled out the hair of his head and of his beard (Ezra 9:3; compare Jeremiah 41:5).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Grief Mixed with Something Forbidden

The third sign is not like the other two. It came from outside Israel.

The law forbade this practice, and it forbade making any mark in the flesh. The nations around them did it. They cut themselves for the dead and tattooed their bodies in honour of their gods. The Israelites belonged to Jehovah (Leviticus 19:28; Leviticus 21:5).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Yet one commentator refuses to write these men off. He weighs their mistake against their hearts.

On the second day he killed these men. They may have been ignorant and not free from pagan practices, but they had broken hearts, and they had come to seek the Lord.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why God Took the Best

Ishmael killed them before they ever reached the temple. One commentator reads this not as an accident of history but as God's purpose.

Who can doubt that it pleased God to take away Gedaliah, and those who sorrowed over the ruins of Israel, before worse evil came? It was mercy to themselves. It was also a further chastening on the guilty people, high and low. Those who acted and felt best of all were swept away, and by the hands of their own countrymen.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Warning in the Whole Chapter

These mourners were heading for the right place. The rest of the story shows that this on its own guaranteed nothing.

Chapters 40 and 41 expose a mistaken idea. Some think that a remnant in the land—in the right place—must have some superior standing. But being in the right place is not enough. If we are not right with the right Person, it will only expose us to bad behaviour and godless hypocrisy, as we see here.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Mourning. Eighty men came grieving the ruin of Israel, in the accepted signs of the time: shaved beards and torn clothes.

- Mixture. One of their signs, cutting the flesh, was a pagan custom the law had banned — real sorrow carried in a wrong form.

- Motive. One writer still judges them gently: ignorant, maybe, but broken-hearted men who had come to seek the Lord.

- Mercy. God took the best away before worse evil came. That was mercy to them, and a further chastening on the nation left behind.

- Marker. Being in the right place is no safeguard; only being right with the right Person is.

Jeremiah 41:6 · Darby

And Ishmael the son of Nethaniah went forth from Mizpah to meet them, weeping all along as he went; and it came to pass when he met them, he said unto them, Come to Gedaliah the son of Ahikam.

Ishmael had murdered Gedaliah at Mizpah two days before, and no one knew. Then eighty pilgrims came down the road toward the ruined temple. The killer walked out to meet them in tears, and invited them to a governor who was already dead. What do tears prove, and what can they hide?

Tears in the Service of Murder

One writer weighs the motives behind that weeping. They had run past jealousy and politics.

It was not only jealousy of the good man who fell without suspecting anything at his own table, where he had generously welcomed these agents of evil. Nor was it simply rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon, which broke out at Mizpah against the local governor and the foreign soldiers. This royal criminal had tasted blood and would keep on with his reckless course, not caring whom he killed or why.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ten of the eighty later bought their lives with hidden stores of wheat, barley, oil and honey. He killed the rest. The same writer names the trait behind that.

It adds to the horrors of the picture too, that Ishmael was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who the Eighty Men Were

His tears matched what these travellers already felt. They had shaved their beards, torn their clothes and cut themselves. They carried grain offerings and incense. One writer describes the worship that had revived in the land, and who these mourners were.

The worship of the Lord even seems to have returned to honour, at a time when the temple lay completely destroyed and ruined. At least there was a "house of Jehovah" where those who mourned over Israel's condition could go up… On the second day Ishmael killed the men who had come to seek the Lord. They were perhaps ignorant, and not free from pagan practices, but their hearts were broken.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Treachery From the Royal Line

Scripture notes that Ishmael belonged to the royal family. One writer treats that detail as deliberate.

The Holy Spirit adds the words "of the royal family" to Ishmael's name and family, and that means something. Normally, and rightly, this would have been a guarantee of support to a governor, and a protection and shelter for the people. But God was forgotten, His judgments and His will alike ignored, and human corruption runs its course where it was least fitting. The ruin of Israel was truly complete when the royal line sank to the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder. And its victims were the best of their own people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's Hand Behind the Loss

Why were the most sincere people in the land the ones cut down? Ishmael threw their bodies into a trench that king Asa had dug long before, when he feared attack. One writer reads two things at once in the loss.

Who can doubt that God was pleased to take Gedaliah, and those who grieved over the desolations of Israel, away from the evil that was coming? It was mercy to themselves. It was also a further chastening on the guilty people, high and low. Those who acted and felt most rightly were swept away — and by the hands of their own countrymen. What a disgrace! A trench dug for self-defence became the common grave of the best of the remnant, shamefully put to death like this.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Right Place Is Not Enough

These chapters describe the people left in the land, in what looked like the right place. One writer draws the lesson from this scene.

Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to godless hypocrisy, as we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word, but they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- False tears. Ishmael's weeping was not grief but bait. He had tasted blood, and no longer cared whom he killed or why.

- True tears. The eighty came with offerings and torn clothes. They truly mourned Israel's ruin, even if their practices were mixed — and their sincerity made them easy to trap.

- Royal shame. The murderer came from the royal family, which marks the ruin as complete. The line meant to shelter the people became its cruellest enemy.

- God's mercy in loss. God took the best of the remnant away from worse evil coming. Their deaths were also a further chastening on a guilty people.

- Place versus Person. Staying in the land, with God's prophet among them, gave no protection. Safety lies in being right with God, not in holding the right position.

Jeremiah 41:7 · Darby

And it was so, when they came into the midst of the city, that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, he and the men that were with him, slew them, [and cast them] into the midst of the pit.

Jerusalem has fallen, and Babylon has left a small group of Jews in the land under a governor named Gedaliah. Ishmael has already murdered him, and here he turns on eighty men who were on their way to worship.

A land where God was forgotten

This chapter sits in a part of Jeremiah that records the collapse of order among the Jews left in the land.

In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44 we see the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land and around it, after Babylon carried most of their brothers away as captives. Jeremiah becomes their helper and brings them the word of Jehovah, but he finds among them the greatest unbelief… Now even the little remnant, the poor people left in the land among whom Jeremiah stayed, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Royal blood, basest crime

The killer was no outsider. He belonged to the royal family, and one writer shows what that should have meant.

The Holy Spirit adds to the name and family of Ishmael the words "of the royal family," and that description means something. By rights it should have guaranteed help to a governor, and support and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten, His judgments and His will ignored, and human corruption ran its course where it least belonged. The ruin of Israel was complete. The royal family had sunk to the lowest kind of cunning, treachery and murder, and against the best of their own people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Tears used as bait

Ishmael met these men in tears and invited them to a governor he had already killed. We cannot explain this killing away as politics, or even as revenge.

This was not only jealousy of the good man who fell without suspicion at his own table, where he had welcomed these agents of evil as guests. Nor was it simply rebellion against the conquering king of Babylon, which then broke out against the native governor and the foreign soldiers at Mizpah. This royal outlaw had tasted blood and would carry on his reckless course, careless whom he killed or why.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The men he killed

Ishmael was not acting alone. One writer names who sent him, and what kind of people his victims were.

He came with evil purposes, sent by Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, and pushed, no doubt, by his own ambition… On the second day he killed the men who had come to seek the Lord. They were perhaps ignorant, and not free from pagan practices, but their hearts were broken.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The pit

The pit was not dug as a grave. Men had cut it for defence, and one writer finds in it both mercy and disgrace.

Who can doubt that God was pleased to take away Gedaliah, and those who sorrowed over the desolations of Israel, from evil to come? It was mercy to them. It was also an added chastening on the guilty people, high and low, that those who acted and felt most rightly should be swept away — and swept away by the hands of their own brothers. What a disgrace! A trench dug for self-defence became the common grave of the best of the remnant, put to death in shame.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ten of the men bought their lives with hidden stores of food. One writer names the trait in Ishmael that saved them.

It adds to the horror of the picture too, that Ishmael was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Right place, wrong heart

These men died in the land, with the prophet Jeremiah living among the remnant. That is what makes the chapter a warning.

Chapters 40-41 expose a false idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must therefore have better qualities. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person only exposes us to bad behaviour and godless hypocrisy, as we see here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted with deceit. To call on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — God forgotten. The remnant left in the land was full of jealousy, private plans, treason, deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

- Rank — no safeguard. Ishmael's royal blood should have made him a shelter for the people. Instead the royal line sank to cunning, treachery and murder.

- Tears — no proof. He wept as he went to meet the eighty men, and named a dead governor as their host. He had tasted blood and no longer cared whom he killed or why.

- Victims — the best of them. They came with broken hearts to seek the Lord. God was pleased to take those who grieved over Israel's ruin away from worse evil ahead.

- Result — a trench for a grave. A trench dug for defence became the grave of the best of the remnant, killed by their own brothers. Being in the right place is no safety without being right with the right Person.

Jeremiah 41:8 · Darby

But ten men were found among them that said unto Ishmael, Do not kill us, for we have hidden stores in the field, of wheat, and of barley, and of oil, and of honey. So he forbore, and did not kill them among their brethren.

Ishmael son of Nethaniah had murdered Gedaliah at Mizpah. Two days later he killed eighty men who came there hoping to meet Gedaliah, and verse 8 is the one crack in that slaughter: ten of them keep their lives by handing over food they had hidden in the fields.

Who the ten men were

The verse gives us no names, only a transaction. One summary of the chapter sets the moment in sequence:

The next day Ishmael met eighty men who came from the north; he invited them to come to Gedaliah, who was dead in his house. When they came to the place he killed them, except ten men, who offered to reveal to him hidden stores of food.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

So the ten belonged to a group on pilgrimage, and they alone walked out of Mizpah alive.

Greed added to the bloodshed

The ten men lived because they had something Ishmael wanted:

It adds to the horrors of the picture too, that Ishmael was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Wheat, barley, oil and honey were enough to stop his sword. The hand that would not spare eighty men for pity spared ten for profit.

A bribe, not mercy

One writer traces Ishmael's deceit from the meal table to the road:

Ishmael came with ten men and killed Gedaliah and those who were with him, at Mizpah. This murder took place immediately after Ishmael had deceitfully eaten with Gedaliah. On the second day after this, 80 men came from Shechem, Shiloh and Samaria wanting to meet with Gedaliah. Ishmael met them, weeping, and guided them into the city, where Ishmael and his men killed them except for ten men who bribed Ishmael to let them live.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The weeping came first. The man who cried on the road took payment to spare ten of them.

Royalty sunk to treachery

What makes the greed worse is who is doing the bargaining. Scripture takes care to tell us Ishmael was of the royal line, and that detail is not filler:

The Holy Spirit adds "of the seed royal" to Ishmael's name and family, and that description means something. Ordinarily, and rightly, that royal descent would have been a guarantee of help to a governor, and a support and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten. His judgments and His will alike were slighted. Human corruption takes its course where it was least fitting. The ruin of Israel was complete. The royal line had sunk to the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder — and this against the best of their own people, God's own people in the good land, now a wasteland morally as well as physically.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A prince who should have sheltered the people sold them their own lives back instead. One reference work draws the plain conclusion about him: his "craft and ferocity show that he was unworthy of a throne."

Morrish Bible Dictionary

Where this leaves the survivors

Being alive was not the same as being safe. One writer looks at the whole group left in the land and asks what went wrong:

But how quickly evil developed in this remnant! If they had feared the Lord and thought on His name; if they had submitted to the rule of Nebuchadnezzar, who was the rod in the Lord's hand to punish Judah for her sins; if they had remembered that they were part of the guilty nation, and that all were caught up in the common ruin — all might have been well. ... But false ones got among them. In Jeremiah 41 the flesh runs wild. Conflict and confusion reign everywhere. Many fall. Some fall into bondage to the power of evil. Others, driven by the fear of man, run to Egypt for safety — the very world God had delivered them from by His own favour and mighty power. "In the fear of the Lord is strong confidence, but the fear of man brings a snare."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The lesson of the chapter

The survivors were in the land and the prophet Jeremiah was among them. It did them no good:

Chapters 40–41 expose a false idea. Being a remnant in the land — in the right place — does not by itself give anyone a higher standing. We can be in the right place and still not be right with the right Person. That only exposes us to bad behaviour and to godless hypocrisy, such as we see here. The prophet of God was among them. They pretended to value his word, and still they acted deceitfully. To call on the Lord Himself out of a pure heart is our safety, and for this the Holy Spirit of God is here: to lift Him high before the eyes of our faith.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Greed — Ishmael's sword stopped for wheat, barley, oil and honey. Commentators see in verse 8 that he was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.

- Bargain — the ten did not receive mercy; they bribed a murderer. They bought their lives with the food they had hidden in the field.

- Royalty — the killer was of the royal line, the very family meant to shelter the people. When that line sank to cunning and murder, the ruin of Israel was complete.

- Bondage — living through the massacre was not the same as being safe. In this chapter the flesh runs wild, many fall, and some end up in bondage to the power of evil.

- Safety — the right place is not enough. They were in the land, with the prophet among them, and still acted deceitfully. Only calling on the Lord out of a pure heart keeps anyone safe.

Jeremiah 41:9 · Darby

And the pit into which Ishmael had cast all the dead bodies of the men whom he had slain by the side of Gedaliah was the one which Asa the king had made for fear of Baasha king of Israel Ishmael the son of Nethaniah filled it with the slain.

Ishmael murdered Gedaliah and threw the bodies into a cistern. Scripture then pauses to say who dug that cistern: King Asa, long before, to defend himself against Baasha. Why does that detail matter?

The Land in Ruins

One writer describes the Jews left in the land after Babylon carried the nation away.

In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we have the anarchy and moral disorder among the Jews left behind in the land or nearby. Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper, ministering the word of the Lord to them, but he finds among them the greatest unbelief. Their earlier unbelief had brought the crisis of destruction upon Jerusalem. But now even the little remnant, the poor left in the land, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Trench Turned into a Grave

Those killed had mourned the ruin of the nation. One commentator reads their removal as mercy to them, and as a further blow to the guilty who survived.

Who can doubt that God was pleased to take Gedaliah away, and those who grieved over the desolation of Israel, from the evil that was coming? It was mercy to themselves. It was an extra chastening on the guilty people, high and low. Those who acted and felt best were swept away — and swept away by the hands of their own countrymen. What a disgrace, that a trench dug for self-defence should become the common burial place of the best of the remnant, killed in this shameful way!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

When the Godly Are Removed

That reading rests on a pattern seen elsewhere in Scripture.

The righteous remnant among God's people may perish, but "no man lays it to heart." Yet if the godly are taken away, it is a solemn sign. Judgment is about to fall, for "the righteous is taken away from the evil to come." It has always been so in the history of the world. As someone has said: "When the Lots are taken out of Sodom, it foreshadows a shower of wrath. Methuselah was taken away a year before the flood. We may conclude that when the Noahs are brought into their arks, it signals a deluge, and that God gathers His harvest before the world's storm, and calls His labourers home before the dark night comes on."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The words are from Isaiah 57:1. The ESV reads: "the righteous man is taken away from calamity."

Asa's Pit and the Fear of Man

Asa was a king who gave way to fear of Baasha, king of Israel.

Jeremiah 41:9 refers to a pit (or cistern) made by Asa "for fear of Baasha king of Israel." This is the last historical note about king Asa. In this passing way God would remind us where his decline began — "the fear of man, which brings a snare."

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

The ESV says Asa made the cistern "for defense against Baasha king of Israel." Older translations read "for fear of Baasha," the wording these writers follow. Another writer suggests what the pit was for.

In Jeremiah 41:9, we read of a pit which he made for fear of Baasha — probably to hide there. How this shows the weakness of man! After all the evidence of the Lord's mercy and power, Asa could forsake Him like this and enter an unholy alliance with a heathen king. He got what he wanted, and Baasha had to abandon his plan. But God had been a witness of it all.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Man Who Filled It

One more trait completes the picture of the man who filled the pit.

It adds to the horror of the picture that Ishmael was as greedy as he was violent and deceitful.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Right Place, Wrong Heart

These people had stayed in the land. It saved no one.

Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must somehow be better qualified. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person only leaves us open to bad behaviour and ungodly hypocrisy. We see it here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word. Yet they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear digs. Asa dug the pit because he was afraid of a rival king instead of trusting God — fear of man was where his decline started.

- Fear outlives. Generations later the pit was still there. Scripture's last word about Asa is this monument to his panic.

- Fear fills. What a king dug to save his own life became the mass grave of the best of the remnant, filled by a greedy and violent man.

- Mercy lifts. Those killed had mourned Israel's ruin. God took them away in mercy to themselves, and their loss chastened the guilty who remained.

- Place is no shelter. The right place protects nobody who is not right with God — not even with a prophet living among them.

Jeremiah 41:10 · Darby

And Ishmael carried away captive all the remnant of the people that were in Mizpah, the king's daughters, and all the people that remained in Mizpah, whom Nebuzar-adan the captain of the body-guard had committed to Gedaliah the son of Ahikam Ishmael the son of Nethaniah carried them away captive, and departed to go over to the children of Ammon.

Mizpah was where the survivors left in Judah had gathered around Gedaliah. In one stroke Ishmael empties the place, taking even the king's daughters, and the rest of the chapter answers whether the crime will stand.

The theft of a trust

Nebuzaradan had placed these people in Gedaliah's care. Ishmael takes them anyway and heads for Ammon. One writer ties the move to a plan already agreed with the Ammonite king, and then marks what God does with it:

Carrying on, it seems, the plans made with the king of the Ammonites, Ishmael next carries away those whom he did not kill… Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty at the moment of their greatest success.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A foreign hand behind a Jewish one

Ishmael was not acting alone, and he was not acting only for himself. One account traces the whole sequence — the warning Gedaliah refused, the murders, the captives driven toward Ammon:

The captains of the forces that remained gathered around Gedaliah, with Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, of the royal family, at their head. But Ishmael came with evil intentions. Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, had sent him, and no doubt his own ambition pushed him on… He led captive all the rest of the people who were at Mizpah, along with the king's daughters, and took them to the Ammonites.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer names the grievance behind it:

Jealousy, however, will spoil everything. A man of royal blood named Ishmael seems to have thought that he should have been appointed governor.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Royal blood as the instrument of ruin

Scripture records Ishmael's royal descent for a reason. The detail measures how far Israel had fallen:

It is not a meaningless description that the Holy Spirit adds to the name and family of Ishmael, "of the royal family." Normally, and rightly, this would have promised help to a governor, and support and shelter to the people. But God was forgotten. His judgments and His will were ignored, and human corruption takes its course where it least belongs. The ruin of Israel was complete when the royal family sank into the lowest form of cunning, treachery, and murder — and this against the best of their own people…

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The captives are freed — and still lost

Ishmael never reaches Ammon. One writer follows the story to its end:

However, Johanan and the captains of the forces with him free the captives from Ishmael, who flees to Baalis the king of the children of Ammon. Johanan and those he has delivered take refuge for a time at the inn of Chimham at Bethlehem, waiting for a chance to slip away into Egypt, because they fear the Chaldeans.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The rescue was real, but the rescuer was no safer a guide than the man he defeated:

The man who freed the captives and drove off their enemy was no true friend of Israel, because he paid little attention to the word of the Lord… Fear is just as much evidence of unbelief as bold or treacherous rebellion, even if it is less blatant. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A remnant that could have been safe

One writer sets what could have been beside what actually happened:

But how soon evil developed in this remnant! They could have feared the Lord and thought on His name. They could have submitted to the rule of Nebuchadnezzar, who was the rod in the Lord's hand to punish Judah for her sins. Then all might have been well… In Jeremiah 41 the flesh is rampant. Conflict and confusion reign supreme. Many fall. Some end up in bondage to the power of evil. Others, driven by the fear of man, seek refuge in Egypt — that world from which God had delivered them by His sovereign favour and mighty power.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The lesson drawn is that rescue is not the same as recovery:

Where there is much restlessness, though a measure of deliverance is experienced, as in the case of this remnant, yet, unless time is taken to learn and act on the present mind of God, worse trouble will follow than was known before.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Trust betrayed. Nebuzaradan placed these people in Gedaliah's care. Ishmael seizes them and heads for Ammon.

- Trust exploited. The Ammonite king backed the plot, and Ishmael's own ambition drove it. Jealousy over the governorship played its part.

- Trust disgraced. The royal line should have sheltered the people. Instead it produced cunning, treachery, and murder.

- Trust restored. God disappoints the guilty at the height of their success. Johanan frees the captives, and Ishmael flees to the Ammonite king.

- Trust refused. Freed but fearful, the remnant heads for Egypt against the prophet's word. Fear is unbelief too.

Jeremiah 41:11 · Darby

And Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces that were with him, heard of all the evil that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah had done;

Jeremiah 41 has just described a massacre: Ishmael killed the governor Gedaliah and eighty men on their way to the temple, then took the rest of Mizpah captive. Verse 11 is the turn — news of it reaches Johanan and his captains, and the chapter moves from crime to rescue.

The Evil Ishmael Had Done

The phrase "all the evil" gathers a whole trail of bloodshed and betrayal into one summary. Here is the record Johanan was hearing about:

Son of Nethaniah, of royal descent, though we do not know which family. His craft and ferocity show that he was unworthy of a throne. He treacherously killed Gedaliah, whom the king of Babylon had made governor over the cities of Judah. He also killed all the Jews who were with him in Mizpah. He followed this crime with the cruel and treacherous murder of eighty men from Shechem, Shiloh, and Samaria. They were bringing gifts to the temple. He spared only ten. He then carried off everyone left in Mizpah as captives, and set out to go over to the Ammonites.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

God Interrupts at the Peak

The rescue begins just as Ishmael's plan is working. He has the captives, and he is on his way to the Ammonites. The timing is the point:

Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty in the moment of their greatest success.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ishmael himself got away, which can look like a failure of justice. But there is more than one way to punish a man:

It is true that Ishmael was not killed. Perhaps, for the moment, a more bitter cup for the conspirators was to return empty-handed and cheated of their prey. They had to face the king who had sent him out to destroy his own people and to plunder for the Ammonites.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Johanan Was

Johanan carries the rescue in this verse. His record, read to the end, runs both ways:

Son of Kareah and captain among the Jews left in the land after the destruction of Jerusalem. He warned Gedaliah of the plot against his life. When Ishmael killed Gedaliah and carried the people away, Johanan was the means of rescuing them. He would not, however, listen to Jeremiah and stay in the land. Instead he led the remnant into Egypt, where they practised idolatry.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Rescuer Who Would Not Listen

So the man God used here was not himself a man of faith. A few verses later he leads the rescued people toward Egypt. Fear drives him now, not malice:

Sadly, the one who delivered the captives and drove their enemy off was no true friend of Israel. He paid little attention to the word of the Lord… Fear is evidence of unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion, even if it is not as blatant. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt… What a blessing for the believer! He has every right to trample on his fears and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rescued, Then Restless

The people were freed. But rescue is not the same as guidance:

This remnant did know a measure of deliverance. But where there is much restlessness, worse calamity will follow than before, unless people take the time to learn the present mind of God and to act on it. These things are recorded for our learning. The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people and it is the same today. How important, then, that we fix our eyes and hearts on the one unfailing Leader — the Lord Himself!

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

All of this happened to people who were in the land — the right place:

Chapters 40–41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — necessarily has some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to the kind of hypocrisy we see here.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Evil peaks. Ishmael's crimes climbed from one murder, to eighty, to mass kidnapping. News of "all the evil" is what sets the rescue in motion.

- God interrupts. God lets shame and suffering run their course. Then He disappoints the guilty at the height of their success.

- Escape isn't acquittal. Ishmael slipped away, but going back empty-handed to the king who sent him may have been the more bitter cup.

- Rescuers need rescuing. Johanan freed the captives, yet he paid little attention to God's word. Fear is unbelief as surely as rebellion is.

- Deliverance needs direction. Being in the right place is not enough without being right with the right Person. Keep your eyes on the one unfailing Leader.

Jeremiah 41:12 · Darby

and they took all the men, and went to fight with Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, and found him by the great waters that are at Gibeon.

Ishmael son of Nethaniah had killed Gedaliah, the governor Babylon appointed, and marched the survivors of Mizpah off as prisoners. Johanan's men catch him at Gibeon — yet a successful rescue does not prove the rescuer is a godly man.

The land after the fall

The chase happens in a land where all order has broken down.

In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we have the anarchy and moral disorder that prevailed among the Jews left behind in the land or nearby. Babylon had carried most of their fellow countrymen away captive. Jeremiah becomes their helper, ministering to them the word of Jehovah, but finds among them the greatest unbelief... now even the little remnant, the poor left in the land among whom Jeremiah remained, were full of jealousy, full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The great waters in Gibeon

Older translations call the great pool of this verse the "great waters." The place is real, and it can still be traced.

Gibeon is identified with a village of scattered houses on a hill. On one side of the hill is a plentiful spring, and lower down the remains of a large reservoir, which is thought to be the "pool" of Gibeon and its "great waters." 2 Samuel 2:13; Jeremiah 41:12, 16.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Ishmael already had a record of bloodshed behind him.

Son of Nethaniah, of the royal line, but of what family is not known. His craft and ferocity show that he was unworthy of a throne. He treacherously killed Gedaliah, whom the king of Babylon had made governor over the cities of Judah. He killed all the Jews who were with him in Mizpah too. He followed up this crime by the cruel and treacherous murder of eighty men from Shechem, Shiloh, and Samaria, who were bringing gifts to the temple. Only ten were spared.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Stopped at the height of his success

Ishmael had won. The governor was dead and the captives were his. That is the moment the pursuit caught up with him.

Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty in the moment of their greatest success.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ishmael himself got away. No execution closed the account, but losing his prize may have hurt him more.

It is true that Ishmael was not killed. The king had sent him to destroy his own people and to plunder for the Ammonites. To go back to that king empty-handed, cheated of his prize, may have been for the moment a more bitter cup to the conspirators.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No better than the man he chased

Johanan looks like the hero of the chapter. Earlier he had offered to kill Ishmael for Gedaliah, and Gedaliah turned him down.

It is not that Johanan was much better than Ishmael. As later events show, he had no real faith in God's word, and he hardened himself in pride and rebellion of heart. Perhaps Gedaliah knew there was little to choose between them. So he rejected Johanan's good warning just as much as his bad offer to get rid of Ishmael.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer weighs the rescuer rather than the rescue:

Sadly, the man who delivered the captives and put their enemy to flight was no true friend of Israel. The reason was that he paid little attention to the word of Jehovah.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The right place, the wrong hearts

These survivors were still in the land while the rest sat in exile. That did not make them better people.

Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea. It is not true that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to ungodly hypocrisy such as we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word. Even so, they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Deliverance came to them, but it did not settle them.

Where there is much restlessness, some deliverance may still come, as it did for this remnant. But unless we take time to learn and act on the present mind of God, worse trouble will follow than before... The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people and it is the same today. How important, then, that our eyes and hearts should look to the one unfailing Leader — to the Lord Himself!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- The people. Those left in the land lived in anarchy and moral disorder: jealousy, treason, deceit, violence, and God absent from their thoughts.

- The place. The great pool of Gibeon is a real spring and reservoir. There Johanan's men caught up with the prisoners.

- The turn. God disappointed Ishmael at the height of his success. He escaped, but going back empty-handed to the king who sent him may have been the bitterer cup.

- The rescuer. Johanan freed the captives, yet he had no real faith in God's word. So he was no true friend to the people he saved.

- The test. Being in the right place counts for nothing without being right with the right Person. Look instead to the one unfailing Leader — the Lord Himself.

Jeremiah 41:13 · Darby

And it came to pass when all the people that were with Ishmael saw Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces that were with him, then they were glad.

Ishmael had murdered Gedaliah and was driving the survivors east toward the Ammonites as spoil. Verse 13 is where that march breaks: the captives see Johanan's troops and their hearts lift — but who they follow next will matter as much as who took them.

Where the rescue happened

Johanan caught up with Ishmael at Gibeon. Its "great waters" were a real water source, and traces of them remain:

On one side of the hill is a plentiful spring. Lower down are the remains of a large reservoir. Many think this was the "pool" of Gibeon and its "great waters." 2 Samuel 2:13; Jeremiah 41:12, 16.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

God spoils the winner's moment

Ishmael had won every round so far. He had killed the governor, slaughtered pilgrims, and taken the rest as prisoners — and at that exact point the tables turned.

Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty in the moment of their greatest success.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ishmael himself got away. But escaping with nothing is its own punishment:

It is true that Ishmael was not killed. But going back empty-handed, robbed of the prey, may have been a more bitter cup for the conspirators at that moment. It meant facing the king who had sent him to destroy his own people and to plunder for the Ammonites.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Gladness that was genuine

These people had watched Ishmael kill their governor and their neighbours, and they were prisoners on the road to a foreign people. One writer traces how the rescue came about:

Ishmael's presence meant the overthrow of Gedaliah. Johanan warned him of this, but Gedaliah treated it as a false suspicion. It was true all the same. Ishmael killed Gedaliah and those with him, and fled with the rest, after adding to his guilt by killing a company of worshippers on their way to the house of the Lord. Johanan heard what Ishmael had done, chased him, and recovered the glad and grateful remnant.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A rescuer who was not a safe leader

There is a sting in this rescue:

Sadly, the man who rescued the captives and drove off their enemy was no true friend of Israel. He paid little attention to the word of the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A short account of his life shows the pattern — brave first, then disobedient:

He warned Gedaliah about the plot against his life. After Ishmael killed Gedaliah and carried the people away, Johanan was the one who rescued them. But he would not listen to Jeremiah and stay in the land. Instead he led the remnant into Egypt, where they worshipped idols.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Fear as the next master

So the rescued people set out for Egypt. Kelly names what drove them there:

Fear shows unbelief just as certainly as bold or treacherous rebellion does, even if it is less blatant. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt. … How good it is that the believer has the right to trample on his fears, and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One Leader who does not fail

A rescue can leave people restless instead of settled. That is the danger Vine warns about here:

Restless people may still know some deliverance, as this remnant did. But unless they take time to learn God's present mind and act on it, worse trouble will follow than they knew before. … The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people, and it is the same today. So how important it is that our eyes and hearts should turn to the one unfailing Leader — to the Lord Himself!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Ishmael won every round until his hour of triumph. Then God disappointed the guilty and left him fleeing empty-handed.

- Gift. The gladness at Gibeon was honest. A real rescue reached a glad and grateful remnant.

- Limit. Their rescuer was no true friend. He paid little attention to the word of the Lord. Brave is not the same as obedient.

- Result. Fear, not faith, chose their next step. Timid unbelief ends where bold rebellion ends.

- Remedy. After a rescue, take time to learn God's mind. Fix your eyes on the one unfailing Leader, not on the man who saved you.

Jeremiah 41:14 · Darby

And all the people that Ishmael had carried away captive from Mizpah turned about and came back, and went to Johanan the son of Kareah.

Jeremiah 41 has just described a massacre. Ishmael killed Gedaliah, the governor Babylon had appointed, and then marched the survivors of Mizpah off toward the Ammonites. Verse 14 is the moment that march breaks, and it raises a hard question: what is a rescue worth when the rescuer himself is not following God?

Cruelty cut short

Up to this point, Ishmael's scheme has worked. One writer sets the rescue against the plans behind the kidnapping.

It seems that Ishmael is carrying forward the plans made with the king of the Ammonites. He goes on next to carry away those whom he did not kill… Yet even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty at the very moment of their greatest success.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer sums up the rescue, and how the freed people felt about it.

Johanan, hearing what Ishmael had done, pursued him, and recovered the glad and grateful remnant.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Ishmael's escape, empty-handed

Verse 15 records that Ishmael slipped away. The murderer never faces trial. Yet one writer finds a judgement of another kind in that escape.

It is true that Ishmael was not killed. But he had to go back with nothing, cheated of the prey, to the king who had sent him to destroy his own people and to plunder for the Ammonites. For the moment that may have been a more bitter cup to the conspirators.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One reference work notes his family background, and what his behaviour showed about him:

Son of Nethaniah, of the 'royal seed,' though from which family is not known. His cunning and ferocity show that he was unworthy of a throne.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A rescuer who ignored God's word

Johanan then led the freed people toward Egypt. That was the one direction the prophet had told them not to go. Escaping Ishmael did not put them in safe hands.

The man who rescued the captives and put their enemy to flight was no true friend of Israel, because he paid little attention to the word of the Lord… Fear is evidence of unbelief just as certainly as bold or treacherous rebellion is, though not as openly. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt… How blessed for the believer that he may trample on his fears, and trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer looks at where that fear took them.

If they had stayed quietly in the land, under the authority of the Babylonian king whom God had placed over them, they would have been kept safe. But choosing human policy, they thought it was safer to go down into Egypt, whereas it proved to be the opposite.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Deliverance without direction

Verse 14 brings real relief. Relief on its own changes nothing if no one stops to ask God what to do next.

Where there is much restlessness, some deliverance may still come, as it did for this remnant. Yet unless we take time to learn God's present mind and act on it, worse trouble will follow than before. These things are written for our instruction. The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people, and it is the same today. How important, then, that we turn our eyes and hearts to the one unfailing Leader — to the Lord Himself!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Right place, wrong hearts

They had stayed in the land itself. One writer warns against reading too much into that.

Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant left in the land — in the right place — necessarily has some superior standing. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to the godless hypocrisy shown here. Even with God's prophet among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Turn — The captives turned back and walked free; God disappoints the guilty at the very moment of their greatest success.

- Escape — Ishmael got away, but returned with nothing, which may have been the bitterer cup for those who sent him.

- Rescuer — Johanan freed them, yet ignored the word of the Lord. He was no true friend to the people he had just saved.

- Fear — Their flight to Egypt came from fear, and fear is evidence of unbelief just as surely as open rebellion is.

- Leader — Some deliverance is not enough. Without stopping to learn God's present mind, worse trouble follows. So keep your eyes on the one unfailing Leader.

Jeremiah 41:15 · Darby

But Ishmael the son of Nethaniah escaped from Johanan with eight men, and went to the children of Ammon.

Jeremiah 41 ends in confusion. Ishmael has murdered Gedaliah the governor and carried off the people, and Johanan has just won the captives back at Gibeon. Verse 15 tells us the ringleader himself got away. Why does God let such a man slip free, and what will the rescued people do now?

Escape to the King Who Sent Him

Ishmael did not run just anywhere. He ran back to the king who had sent him:

The captains of the forces who were left gathered around Gedaliah, with Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, of the royal family, at their head. But this man came with evil purposes. Baalis, the king of the Ammonites, had sent him, and no doubt his own ambition drove him on... Johanan and the captains of the forces followed him. They found him near the waters of Gibeon, defeated him, and took the captives back from him. Ishmael himself escaped with eight men and went to Baalis.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Ammon was no neutral refuge. God's law had long since shut that nation out:

"No Ammonite or Moabite may enter the assembly of the LORD. Even to the tenth generation, none of them may enter the assembly of the LORD forever"... Such is God's ordinance concerning them. Israel ought never to seek their peace nor their prosperity.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

A Survivor With Empty Hands

Ishmael kept his life. He kept nothing else:

It is true that Ishmael was not killed. But he had to go back with nothing, cheated of his prey, to the king who had sent him as a destroyer of his own people and a plunderer for the Ammonites. For the moment that may have been a more bitter cup for the conspirators.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer sees a rule in it:

God sometimes permits the severest measures of shame and suffering. Yet even then He disappoints the guilty in the moment of their greatest success.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Rescuer's Own Fear

With Ishmael gone, Johanan looks like the hero. But he set out for Egypt, and one writer weighs him by another measure:

The man who rescued the captives and drove their enemy off was no true friend of Israel. He paid little attention to the word of Jehovah... Fear proves unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion does, even if it is not as shocking. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Right Place, Wrong Person

This group had stayed in the land while the rest went to Babylon. Being there did them no good:

Chapters 40-41 show how false it is to think that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualifications. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to ungodly hypocrisy, as we see here. The prophet of God was among them, and they pretended to value his word. Even so, they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Movement Without Waiting

Ishmael runs to Ammon; Johanan sets out for Egypt. Neither side waits on God:

This remnant did know a measure of deliverance. Yet where people are restless, and will not take time to learn God's present mind and act on it, worse disaster follows than before. These things are recorded for our learning. The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people, and it is the same today. So how important it is that we turn our eyes and hearts to the one Leader who never fails — to the Lord Himself!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Escape plotted. Baalis, king of the Ammonites, sent Ishmael, and his own ambition drove him — a man of royal blood used to destroy his own people.

- Escape emptied. He kept his life but lost his prey; God disappoints the guilty at the very moment of their greatest success.

- Escape granted. Johanan won the captives back at Gibeon. But he had little regard for the word of the Lord, so the rescue settled nothing.

- Escape attempted. Johanan ran for Egypt out of fear — and fear is as real a mark of unbelief as open treachery.

- Escape refused. Being in the right place is not the same as being right with the right Person. Where no one waits to learn God's present mind, worse trouble follows than before.

Jeremiah 41:16 · Darby

Then Johanan the son of Kareah, and all the captains of the forces that were with him, took all the remnant of the people whom he had recovered from Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, from Mizpah, after he had slain Gedaliah the son of Ahikam, the mighty men of war, and the women, and the children, and the eunuchs, whom he had brought again from Gibeon;

Jeremiah 41 ends with a rescue. Johanan and his captains have caught up with the murderer Ishmael. The whole column of prisoners he had dragged out of Mizpah is now in his hands: fighting men, women, children, and the eunuchs who served at court. The question the chapter leaves open is what a rescued people will do next.

The state of the land

These chapters record what happened to the Jews who were not deported to Babylon.

In Jeremiah 40 to Jeremiah 44, we have the anarchy and moral disorder that took hold among the Jews who stayed behind in the land or near it. Most of their countrymen had gone as captives to Babylon. Jeremiah becomes their helper, ministering to them the word of the Lord, but finds among them the greatest unbelief. Even the little remnant was full of jealousy. These were the poor left in the land, and Jeremiah stayed among them. They were full of their own plans, full of treason, full of deceit and violence. God was not really in their thoughts.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the captives had come through

The people Johanan brought back from Gibeon had just lived through the murder of their governor and his followers. Ishmael was driving them off to the Ammonites.

Johanan, one of the captains, warned Gedaliah that treachery was being planned. Gedaliah refused to believe it, and refused to take part in killing Ishmael. Ishmael struck him down in a cowardly way, rebelling for the last time against the king of Babylon's authority. He massacred the governor's followers and the Chaldean soldiers who were found there. On the second day he killed men who had come to seek the Lord. They may have been ignorant, and not free from pagan practices, but their hearts were broken. He led captive all the rest of the people who were at Mizpah, along with the king's daughters, to the Ammonites. Johanan and the captains of the forces followed him, found him near the waters of Gibeon, defeated him, and recovered the captives from him. Ishmael escaped with eight men and went to Baalis, the king of the Ammonites.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

God cuts the crime short

Ishmael was at the height of his success when Johanan overtook him.

Even when God permits the severest measures of shame and suffering, He disappoints the guilty at the moment of their greatest success.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The rescuer ignored God's word

Verse 16 hands the people to Johanan. He beat Ishmael, but he was not a safe man to follow.

The one who delivered the captives and put their enemy to flight was no true friend of Israel, because he paid little attention to the word of the Lord... Fear proves unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion does, even if less obviously. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt. What came of this disobedience, flowing from distrust, we have yet to learn. How blessed for the believer that he is entitled to trample on fears, and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rescued, but still restless

A real deliverance had just happened. What did not happen was any pause to ask God what came next.

God had set up the power and protection of Babylon. They did not settle quietly and confidently under it. Instead they moved toward Egypt, while still staying in the land. Fear filled their hearts, not quiet confidence in God and in His will. The conflicts they had seen only increased this. There was no waiting on God... This remnant did taste some deliverance. But where there is much restlessness, worse trouble follows than before — unless people take time to learn the present mind of God and act on it.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Being in the right place is not enough

They still had the land, and the prophet still lived among them.

Chapters 40-41 expose the mistaken idea that a remnant in the land — in the right place — necessarily has some superior standing. To be in the right place without being right with the right Person will only expose us to bad behaviour and to godless hypocrisy, as it does here. Even with the prophet of God among them, whose word they pretended to value, they acted deceitfully.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The one Leader who does not fail

The same writer takes the failure of these captains into our own day.

The active leaders caused all the mischief with this remnant of God's people, and it is the same today. How important, then, that our eyes and hearts should be turned to the one unfailing Leader — to the Lord Himself!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Rescued. At the exact moment of Ishmael's success, God disappointed him — the captives turned around at Gibeon and walked free.

- Rescued by whom. The captains who recovered them paid little attention to the word of the Lord. The people passed from a murderer's hands into unbelieving ones. Only one Leader never fails — the Lord Himself.

- Rescued, then restless. Real deliverance came, but no waiting on God followed it. Fear, not confidence, set the direction of the march.

- Rescued, but not right. They kept the land and kept the prophet. But the right place without being right with God only exposed their deceit.

- Rescued and warned. Jeremiah had told them to stay and submit, not to run to Egypt. Fear is as much unbelief as open rebellion. The believer may trample on fear and trust the word of the Lord.

Jeremiah 41:17 · Darby

and they departed, and dwelt at Geruth-Chimham, which is by Bethlehem, to go to enter into Egypt,

Jeremiah 41 ends with a group of survivors on the move. Johanan has just rescued them from a murderer. Now he leads them to a lodging place near Bethlehem, with Egypt in view. The chapter names their reason: they feared the Chaldeans, that is, the Babylonians. That fear is what the commentators weigh.

Rescued, but Already Drifting

One writer traces the sequence from Ishmael's murder of Gedaliah — the governor Babylon had appointed — to this halt on the road.

Johanan and the captains of the forces with him free the captives from Ishmael, who escapes to Baalis, the king of the Ammonites. Johanan and the people he has rescued take shelter for a time in the inn of Chimham at Bethlehem. They are waiting for a chance to slip away into Egypt, because they fear the Chaldeans.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

They never actually left the land. One writer notes that the move stayed inside the borders, yet aimed outward:

But they did not settle quietly and confidently under the rule and protection of Babylon, which God had set up. Instead they moved toward Egypt, while still staying in the land. Fear filled their hearts, not quiet confidence in God and in His will.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Fear as a Form of Unbelief

One commentator refuses to treat their fear as a small thing.

Fear is proof of unbelief just as surely as bold or treacherous rebellion is, even if it is not as shocking. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon and not to flee into Egypt. What came out of this disobedience, which flowed from distrust, we have yet to learn. How blessed the believer is, who may trample on his fears and trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Place They Chose to Wait

The lodging place in this verse belongs to a man named Chimham. He came from Gilead and was likely a son of Barzillai. Barzillai entrusted him to David when David returned to Jerusalem after his son Absalom's revolt (Morrish Bible Dictionary). One writer follows that thread and suggests a striking possibility, while admitting no one can prove it.

We do not know for sure, but could it be that David shared his own family estate at Bethlehem with him? We know that our King shares His kingly home with those who share His rejection. ... Some think this place should be called the "Inn of Chimham". They think that later, perhaps, it was this very inn that had "no room" for the King of Kings. So in its stable, at Bethlehem, the Son greater than David came into our world, rejected — as David had been rejected, in a smaller way, before Him. We cannot know for sure about this.

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

Egypt, the One Closed Road

Only one of the two empires offered a way back. One writer contrasts the group heading for Egypt with the captives already in Babylon.

This group goes down into Egypt against the word of the Lord, and there they are destroyed by sword, famine, and disease. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the time being. This group takes Jeremiah with them into Egypt, even though he announces their doom. The others have Ezekiel and Daniel with them at Babylon... At the beginning God redeemed the people out of Egypt. Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. So going back to Egypt was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Their calculation was that Egypt would be safer. It was not.

If they had stayed quietly in the land, under the authority of the Chaldean king whom God had placed over them, they would have been kept safe. But they chose human strategy instead. They thought it was safer to go down into Egypt, and the opposite proved true. Nebuchadnezzar chased the Egyptians and punished these unbelieving Jews in that land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Restlessness Instead of Waiting

What is missing at Chimham is any pause to ask God. That absence, one writer argues, is what turns a rescue into a disaster.

There was no waiting on God. They had no sense of what God's mind for them was at that moment, even though His prophet was right there. Where there is much restlessness, people may still see some deliverance, as this remnant did. But unless they take time to learn God's present mind and act on it, a worse disaster will follow than the one they knew before.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Rescued. Johanan won the captives back from Ishmael. The rescue was real, but it settled nothing about their next step.

- Afraid. They moved because they feared the Chaldeans. Fear like this is unbelief in a quieter form than Ishmael's open treachery.

- Halted. They stop at Chimham's lodging near Bethlehem, named after Barzillai's son. Some think — though no one can prove it — it was the inn with no room for the Son greater than David.

- Aimed wrong. God promised deliverance from Babylon. Egypt was the one road that could only end in sword, famine, and disease.

- Unasked. God's prophet stood right among them, and no one asked him. That silence, not the Babylonians, carried them into a worse disaster than the one they fled.

Jeremiah 41:18 · Darby

because of the Chaldeans; for they feared them, because Ishmael the son of Nethaniah had smitten Gedaliah the son of Ahikam, whom the king of Babylon had appointed over the land.

The chapter ends with Johanan and the survivors camped at Chimham near Bethlehem, with Egypt already in view. They were afraid of the Chaldeans — the Babylonians — because Ishmael had murdered Gedaliah, the governor Babylon had appointed. Their fear was real, but they made their plans without once turning to the Lord.

What Their Fear Revealed

Johanan had just rescued the captives and driven off a murderer. One writer still puts his fear on the same level as Ishmael's treachery:

The man who rescued the captives and put their enemy to flight was no true friend of Israel, because he paid little attention to the word of the Lord... Fear is evidence of unbelief just as surely, if not as blatantly, as bold or treacherous rebellion. The prophet had warned them to submit to the king of Babylon, not to flee into Egypt. What came of this disobedience, flowing from distrust, we have yet to learn. How blessed the believer is! He has the right to trample on fears, and to trust the word of the Lord without anxiety!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Camped Halfway

Chimham's lodging near Bethlehem was still inside the land. But they stopped there with another country in mind:

Johanan and those he has delivered take refuge for a time at the inn of Chimham at Bethlehem. They are waiting for a chance to slip away into Egypt, because they fear the Chaldeans.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Another writer names what was missing in their hearts:

They did not quietly and confidently settle under the power and protection of Babylon, which God had established. Instead they moved toward Egypt, though they were still in the land. Fear filled their hearts, and not quiet confidence in God and in His will.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Safety They Walked Away From

Babylon's yoke looked like the danger. One writer shows what submitting to it would have secured:

If at this last hour this remnant had submitted to the yoke of Nebuchadnezzar, peace would have reigned in the land. These few who were left would have kept the land as their own. But some revolt, and the others fear the consequences of their folly. There is no idea of trusting in the Lord. They consult Jeremiah, but refuse to obey the word of the Lord from his mouth. They take refuge in Egypt to escape Nebuchadnezzar. But there they fall under the sword that would have spared them in Judea, if they had stayed there in subjection to the king.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Egypt Was Not a Neutral Refuge

One writer sets the two groups of survivors side by side — those heading for Egypt, and those already in Babylon:

These go down into Egypt, against the word of the Lord, and sword and famine and plague will destroy them. Those at Babylon have peace and prosperity and plenty promised to them for the present... God at the beginning redeemed the people out of Egypt, but Babylon became the place of their captivity when they had turned away from the Lord. To return to Egypt, therefore, was fatal, but from Babylon there was deliverance.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Two Fears, One Choice

One writer sums up the whole chapter, then sets two kinds of fear side by side:

In Jeremiah 41 the flesh runs wild. Conflict and confusion reign. Many fall. Evil takes some into bondage. Others, driven by the fear of man, seek refuge in Egypt — the very world God had delivered them from by His sovereign favour and mighty power. "In the fear of the LORD one has strong confidence" (Proverbs 14:26), but "the fear of man lays a snare" (Proverbs 29:25).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Being in the Right Place Is Not Enough

These survivors were the ones left in the land — and one writer refuses to treat that as an advantage:

Chapters 40-41 expose a mistaken idea: that a remnant in the land — in the right place — must have some superior qualification. To be in the right place is not enough. Without being right with the right Person, we are open only to bad behaviour and to ungodly hypocrisy like the kind shown here.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Fear — Their dread of Babylon after Gedaliah's death was real, but one writer calls fear like this evidence of unbelief.

- Flight — Fear never stands still. It left them camped at Chimham, with Egypt already their secret plan.

- Forfeit — If they had stayed under the yoke God appointed, they would have had peace and kept the land.

- Fatal refuge — Egypt was the house they had been redeemed out of; Babylon had a way home, Egypt did not.

- Faith — Standing in the right place saved no one. Only being right with God could do that.