Jeremiah 23:9–40

Jeremiah 23:9 · Darby

Concerning the prophets My heart within me is broken; all my bones shake; I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome; because of Jehovah, and because of the words of his holiness.

Chapter 23 turns to the men who claimed to speak for God. At that point Jeremiah stops prophesying and starts shaking — and the reason he gives reaches past these men to God Himself.

The prophets who broke him

The men Jeremiah grieves over were not outsiders.

The prophets in Jeremiah's time included some of the very best, though there were also some of the worst. These worse ones moved among God's people, yet they "prophesied by Baal and went after things that do not profit" (Jer. 2:8). "The prophets prophesy falsely" (Jer. 5:31), and yet they used the Lord's name, though He "did not send them" (Jer. 14:15). Therefore "by sword and famine those prophets shall be consumed." Jeremiah's heart was broken within him because of these prophets (Jer. 23:9). Adultery, lying, profanity, false dreaming, recklessness, and lewdness marked them. They had sunk so low that they were "like Sodom" (Jer. 23:14).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What made him tremble

The cause he names is not the men. It is the LORD and His holy words. One writer ties that trembling to the judgment God's holiness must bring.

In his service Jeremiah kept meeting false prophets. They contradicted his message and denied that the Lord had sent him. This was his constant difficulty, and he felt it most of all, because of the state of heart it showed in them. So he says, "My heart is broken within me," and this is because of the prophets. He also says, "All my bones shake." And let the reader carefully note that it was because he was thinking of the coming judgment… He mourned over their condition, and he saw no escape for them, because of the LORD and the words of His holiness. In other words, under a ministry of law, he had only one message for these sinners: unrelieved judgment.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where their message came from

Later in the chapter Jeremiah names the root of the problem.

Jeremiah next reproached the prophets (23:9, 16). Instead of passing the Word of the Lord on to their hearers, "they speak visions of their own minds." They should have stood in the council of God and made His people hear His Word (v. 22). Instead, they go out with their own thoughts. How dangerous is the unfaithfulness that twists, or even falsifies, God's message by mixing in one's own opinions. "I did not send the prophets, yet they ran; I did not speak to them, yet they prophesied" (v. 21).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Corruption from the inside

How does a whole nation reach this state?

It is painful but useful to trace how religious corruption grows. It does not come from outside, but from within. Outward temptation, it seems, could never have brought the people of Judah to rebel so boldly. Corrupt prophets and a corrupt priesthood did that. They held on to certain ordinances of God, but not in the power of God. They held them in the form that human wisdom had put in their place, and that is what blinded them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The response the verse teaches

Jeremiah could have denounced these men from a distance. Instead he broke. One writer turns the same test on the Christian world today.

Judgment has already been pronounced. It is ready to fall on Christendom, which hates, despises, and often persecutes Christ's true witnesses. Do we mourn rather than rejoice? Are we distressed rather than condemning? … Tears over the ruin, and grace and pity toward those who have gone astray, reach the hearts of the Lord's sheep caught up in it. The most righteous criticism does not.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

From judgment to persuasion

The same holiness that broke Jeremiah also pressed on Paul, with a different result.

Turning now to the apostle Paul, we see that the holiness of God rests on his soul too. He thinks of people who, through unbelief, do not know what the blood of Christ has done. He remembers, as Jeremiah did, that they could never stand such a test. But instead of announcing judgment, as the prophet did under the order of his own day, he writes as a man in the day of grace: "knowing the fear of the Lord, we persuade others."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Broken by whom — prophets who used the Lord's name while marked by adultery, lying and false dreaming. God's verdict on them: "by sword and famine those prophets shall be consumed."

- Broken by what — the shaking bones and the drunken reeling came from the Lord and His holy words. Jeremiah was thinking of the judgment such holiness must bring.

- Broken because they spoke themselves — they never stood in God's council. They ran unsent, and gave out visions from their own minds.

- Broken from within — the rot did not come from outside pressure. It came from men who held God's ordinances in a human form instead of in His power.

- Broken, not bitter — tears and pity reach the Lord's sheep where criticism never will. Under law the message was judgment; grace turns it into persuasion.

Jeremiah 23:10 · Darby

For the land is full of adulterers; for because of execration the land mourneth. The pastures of the wilderness are dried up; for their course is evil, and their force is not right.

Jeremiah 23 opens with a woe on Israel's failed shepherds and the promise of a righteous King, then turns to the prophets. This verse is the charge sheet: a land full of unfaithfulness, and pastures dried up because of it.

Where the verse stands

The chapter has two halves. After the promise of a coming true Shepherd, Jeremiah turns on the men who claimed to speak for God in his own day.

Jeremiah had a woe for the shepherds, along with the assurance of a true Shepherd who was coming, even Jehovah-Tsidkenu as He shall be called. Meanwhile he had to denounce the prophets and priests (vv. 9-40), when hypocrisy had gone out into all the land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A land full of adulterers

The corruption starts at the top and spreads down.

Verses 9-14. The prophet is overwhelmed because of the wicked prophets, because wickedness was found in the LORD's house. The false prophets of Samaria had led the people into idolatry, and the prophets of Judah were guilty of all kinds of immoralities. Like priests, like people; they all became to the Lord as Sodom, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem like Gomorrah.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Adultery is a marriage word. Israel belonged to the Lord as a wife, so turning to other gods was more than disloyalty.

The sad truth is that Israel was married to Jehovah, as the prophets remind the people (Isa. 54; Jer. 3). So their unfaithfulness is branded, not like the Babylon of the New Testament as prostitution, but as adultery (so in Hosea 3 and elsewhere). Yet His grace may one day deal with Israel, not as a guilty widow, but as a woman forsaken and a wife of youth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the ground itself mourns

The verse ties the sin of the people to the state of the soil. A settled principle stands behind it: the earth carries the weight of what people do.

The earth at large, as we well know, suffers everywhere because of the sin of man. It suffers both by the desolation that sin itself produces and by the judgments that come upon it from God. So the places of highest privilege may necessarily become the places of most marked desolation.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

God had said in advance what His anger would do to the sky and the soil.

"And then" — mark the sure and solemn consequences — "the LORD's wrath is kindled against you, and He shuts up the heaven, so that there is no rain, and the land does not yield its fruit, and you perish quickly from the good land that the LORD gives you." What barrenness and desolation there must be when heaven is shut up! No refreshing showers coming down, no dewdrops falling, no communication between heaven and earth.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A course that is evil

"Their course is evil" describes men in motion — running hard, but not sent. That is exactly the complaint the chapter makes against them.

Jeremiah next reproached the prophets (23:9,16). Instead of passing on the Word of the Lord to their hearers, "They speak a vision of their own heart." They should stand in the council of God and cause His people to hear His Word (v.22), but they go out according to their own thoughts. How dangerous is that unfaithfulness, which twists or even falsifies the message of God's Word by bringing in one's own opinions. "I did not send these prophets, yet they ran; I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied" (v.21).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The prophet who is broken by it

Jeremiah does not list these sins coldly. He shakes as he speaks, and one writer traces the shaking to what he saw coming.

He says, "My heart within me is broken because of the prophets." He also says, "All my bones shake." Note that it was because he thought of the coming judgment. He goes on, "I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine has overcome, because of the LORD, and because of the words of His holiness." He mourned over their condition, and he saw no escape for them, because of Jehovah and the words of His holiness. Under a ministry of law, the message he had to proclaim to these sinners could only be one of unrelieved judgment.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Full — the land is full of adulterers. The prophets were guilty of every kind of immorality, and priests and people followed them.

- Faithless — Israel was married to the Lord. So Scripture brands her turn to other gods adultery, not prostitution.

- Fruitless — the earth suffers because of the sin of man. The most favoured place becomes the most desolate. When heaven is shut up, nothing falls and nothing grows.

- Fast, but unsent — they ran, but God never sent them. They spoke their own thoughts instead of standing in God's council.

- Felt — Jeremiah's bones shake at the judgment he sees coming. He mourned over these men and saw no escape for them.

Jeremiah 23:11 · Darby

For both prophet and priest are profane even in my house have I found their wickedness, saith Jehovah.

In this chapter God charges the two men who were meant to keep the nation close to Him: the prophet who speaks for Him, and the priest who serves in His house. The shock of the verse is not that sin existed in Israel, but where God says He found it. Where the ESV says "ungodly," older translations say "profane." The writers quoted here use that older Bible wording throughout.

Evil Found in His Own House

The sting of the charge lies in its location. One writer looks back at what God had already done to Shiloh, and warns that the same hand would fall on Jerusalem:

Shiloh was the place where the tent of worship was first set up in the land. What was Shiloh now? God had profaned it. And God would do the very same thing where the ark now stood, in the sanctuary at Jerusalem. It is impossible for God to bind Himself to keep up an empty form. He would no longer support a beautiful picture of His truth while the people and the priests were, in His eyes, the most offensive evil under the sun. God had granted the Jewish people and their priests great truth, great blessing, or at the very least great privileges. The greater the gift, the greater the wickedness of their insults to His holiness in His own temple.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Prophet and Priest Alike

Both offices fall under the same word. One writer sets the verse beside the next line about slippery paths, and beside an earlier complaint from chapter 2:

As to the priests, we see a picture which, sadly, is only too common all through the Bible. "Both prophet and priest are profane; yes, in My house I have found their wickedness, says the Lord. Therefore their way shall be to them as slippery ways in the darkness" (Jer. 23:11-12). "The priests did not say, Where is the Lord? and those who handle the law did not know Me" (Jer. 2:8). Pashhur, like Jeremiah, was of the priestly family. His sin brought judgment upon him, as is recorded in Jeremiah 20. He is a striking example.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What the Wickedness Was

The corruption took different shapes in the two kingdoms, and it did not stay at the top:

Verses 9-14. The prophet is overwhelmed because of the wicked prophets, and because there was wickedness in the LORD's house. The false prophets of Samaria had led the people into idolatry. The prophets of Judah were guilty of all kinds of immorality. Like priests, like people. To the Lord they all became like Sodom, and the people of Jerusalem like Gomorrah.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Jeremiah's Broken Heart

The verse sits inside a lament, not a lecture. One writer points to what made Jeremiah grieve:

So he says, "My heart within me is broken because of the prophets." He also says, "All my bones shake." Note that it was because he thought of the coming judgment. He goes on, "I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine has overcome, because of the Lord, and because of the words of His holiness. For the land is full of adulterers … both prophet and priest are profane," and so on. He mourned over their condition, and he saw no escape for them, because of Jehovah and the words of His holiness.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The Same Pattern Since

This failure does more than ruin the men themselves. It stains the truth they claim to teach:

What can stain "the way of the truth" more deeply than the loose living, in whatever form, of these approved teachers? Jeremiah's writings show us most fully the prophets prophesying lies and the priests turning a blind eye to the evil so that they could rule.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer applies the same rule to whatever carries God's name today:

"Judgment must begin at the house of God" (1 Peter 4:17). We see it in the symbolic history of the churches in Revelation 2 and 3. God will judge corrupt Christendom no less than He judged corrupt Judaism… When the truth is twisted and real godliness is gone, what can come but judgment from God? That is even more true if the false thing carries His holy Name.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Place — the charge is not that Israel sinned, but that God found the evil in His own house.

- Privilege — more privilege means more guilt, not less. The insult strikes at His holiness.

- Pair — prophet and priest fall together. The men who handled God's law did not know Him.

- Spread — like priests, like people. The rot started at the top and took the whole city, until Jerusalem was to the Lord like Sodom and Gomorrah.

- Pattern — judgment begins at the house of God. Whatever carries His name without the truth faces the same word.

Jeremiah 23:12 · Darby

Therefore their way shall be unto them as slippery places in the darkness; they shall be driven on, and fall therein for I will bring evil upon them in the year of their visitation, saith Jehovah.

In Jeremiah 23 the Lord turns from the shepherds who scattered the flock to the prophets and priests. Verse 12 is His sentence on them: their own road becomes the thing that ruins them, at a time He has already fixed.

Wickedness found in God's own house

The "therefore" of verse 12 reaches back to the charge in the verse before it. God found their evil in His own house, among the men who served there.

As to the priests, we are shown a picture which, sadly, is only too common all through the Bible. "Both prophet and priest are profane; yes, in My house I have found their wickedness, says the Lord. Therefore their way shall be to them like slippery paths in the darkness" (Jer. 23:11-12). "The priests did not say, Where is the Lord? and those who handle the law did not know Me" (Jer. 2:8). Pashur, like Jeremiah, was of the priestly family. His sin brought judgment upon him, as recorded in Jeremiah 20. He is a striking example.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

From leaders to people

The failure did not stay at the top.

The prophet is overwhelmed because of the wicked prophets, because wickedness was found in the Lord's house. The false prophets of Samaria had led the people into idolatry, and the prophets of Judah were guilty of all kinds of immoralities. Like priests, like people; they all became to the Lord as Sodom, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem like Gomorrah.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The road itself as the punishment

The punishment is not brought in from outside. It is their own way, made slippery. One writer states the rule behind such a sentence, and shows how steep the slide is for those who once claimed to serve God.

So it is always. In righteous government our sin soon becomes our chastening and the world's sorrow. What our blindness built on as rock turns out to be quicksand — the plaything of waves and winds in the swift-coming day of visitation. The path of unbelief is a rapid descent when the heart hardens itself against a direct warning of the Lord. And the greater the profession of godliness before, the deeper the fall.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A road that ends in the dark

The verse calls it "their way." That word covers the whole life a person leads.

The wicked have their "path." This figure of speech is a familiar one: life is like a way. Living our lives is therefore like walking a path. The path of the wicked is the order of life the wicked live. It is to be avoided at all cost. It leads into the darkness of night, where stumbling is certain sooner or later.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Rough ground, not slippery ground

God gives His own people a different road. It is hard going, and He means it to be.

The path through the desert must be rough, and it is well that it is so. Any right-minded person would rather be set in a rough way than in a "slippery" one. The Lord sees that we need to be put through roughness and hardness. It is not only so that we may find the rest at the end sweeter. It is also so that we may be better trained and fitted for the place we are yet to occupy.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

A message of judgment only

Verse 12 offers these men no way out. One writer explains why the prophet's message could not soften, and what changed later.

He mourned over their condition, and he saw no escape for them, because of Jehovah and the words of His holiness. In other words, under a ministry of law, the message he had to preach to these sinners could only be one of judgment without relief. (See vv. 12-40.) Turning now to the apostle Paul, we shall see that he also had the holiness of God working on his soul... But instead of announcing judgment, as the prophet did in keeping with the age he served in, he writes as one in the day of grace.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The sentence starts with a "therefore." God found wickedness in His own house, among prophet and priest alike.

- Spread. Leaders set the tone: like priests, like people, until the Lord counted them as Sodom and Jerusalem's people as Gomorrah.

- Sentence. In God's righteous government, sin itself becomes the chastening. What looked like rock turns out to be quicksand.

- Direction. A way that runs into darkness makes a fall certain sooner or later; that is where this road leads.

- Contrast. A rough path trains and fits us. A slippery one only carries a person down. Under law Jeremiah could announce nothing but judgment; grace speaks later.

Jeremiah 23:13 · Darby

And I have seen folly in the prophets of Samaria they prophesied by Baal, and caused my people Israel to err.

The chapter turns from Judah's failed kings to the men who claimed to speak for God. Here the LORD points back to an older rot. It had already ruined the northern kingdom, through prophets who spoke in the name of Baal. How could men in a sacred office become the very thing that pulled a nation away from God?

The prophets brought into court

After the promise of a coming true Shepherd, Jeremiah is made to expose the men who filled the prophetic office in both kingdoms. One writer sets the two side by side and notes that God was not a distant observer of any of it.

There was absurdity in the prophets of Samaria, who served idols. There was filthiness in the prophets of Jerusalem, when hypocrisy had gone out into all the land. So the LORD of hosts commanded His people not to listen to those prophets. They made the people empty, speaking a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD... The LORD, who fills heaven and earth, was not unheeding but marked those who prophesied lies in His name.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Samaria first, then Jerusalem

Samaria was the capital of the northern kingdom. Judah was no cleaner, and one writer shows how the people came to match their leaders.

Verses 9-14. The prophet is overwhelmed by the wicked prophets, because there was wickedness in the LORD's house. The false prophets of Samaria had led the people into idolatry. The prophets of Judah were guilty of every kind of immorality. Like priests, like people; they all became to the Lord as Sodom, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem like Gomorrah.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Speaking by Baal

Baal was the false god of the surrounding nations. These prophets were not outsiders. One writer sets them beside the best men of the same period.

The prophets in Jeremiah's time included some of the very best, though there were also some of the worst. These last ones, though moving among God's people, "prophesied by Baal, and walked after things that do not profit" (Jer. 2:8); "The prophets prophesied falsely" (Jer. 5:31), and yet used the Lord's name, though He "sent them not" (Jer. 14:15). So "by sword and famine shall those prophets be consumed." These prophets broke Jeremiah's heart.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

How a people is led astray

The verse does not only diagnose the prophets; it names the damage — a whole nation pulled off course. The mechanism is simple: their own thoughts were passed off as God's.

Jeremiah next reproached the prophets (23:9,16). They do not give their hearers the Word of the Lord. "They speak a vision of their own heart." They do not stand in the council of God and make His people hear His Word (v.22). They go out according to their own thoughts. That unfaithfulness is dangerous. It warps, or even falsifies, the message of God's Word by bringing in one's own opinions.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Decay that starts inside

Outside pressure did not break Judah. One writer traces where the decay actually began.

It is painful but profitable to trace the progress of religious corruption; it arises not from outside, but from within. It seems no outside temptation could have made the people of Judah rebel so boldly. Their own corrupt prophets and priests did that.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God deals hardest with leaders

God holds leaders to a higher account. One writer explains why, and carries the same rule into church life.

Responsibility is increased by position and privilege... Instead of guiding the people rightly, they caused many to stumble. Whenever leaders go astray, the results are more serious, because they have more influence, for good and for evil... A private Christian who falls into error or immorality has influence only on his own circle. But if a well-known teacher in the Church leaves the way of truth, he often draws thousands after him into his own evil path.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. These men prophesied by Baal while living among God's people. They used the Lord's name, though He never sent them.

- Start. Corruption began inside. Judah's own prophets and priests did what no outside pressure could do.

- Substitution. They spoke a vision of their own heart instead of God's word. Opinion dressed up as God's message warps it.

- Scale. The damage matches the platform. A private believer's error touches his own circle. A leader's error draws away thousands.

- Scrutiny. The God who fills heaven and earth was not unheeding; He marked every man who prophesied lies in His name.

Jeremiah 23:14 · Darby

And in the prophets of Jerusalem have I seen a horrible thing they commit adultery, and walk in falsehood, and strengthen the hands of evildoers, so that none doth return from his wickedness. They are all become unto me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah.

God's charge here falls on the men who claimed to speak for Him in Jerusalem, not on the nation as a whole. The sins He lists are moral, not doctrinal. The last line is the sharpest: God measures His own city against Sodom and Gomorrah.

Jerusalem's Prophets Compared with Samaria's

Verse 13 names the prophets of Samaria. Verse 14 turns to Jerusalem, and the charge grows worse. One writer names the difference between the two failures, and what marked both as false.

There was absurdity in the idolatrous prophets of Samaria. There was filthiness in the prophets of Jerusalem, when hypocrisy had spread through all the land. So the Lord of hosts commanded His people not to listen to these prophets. They made the people empty. They spoke a vision of their own heart, not a word from the mouth of the Lord… They had no authority at all. If they had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The corruption did not stay at the top. Where the teachers went, the people followed:

Verses 9-14. The prophet is overwhelmed because of the wicked prophets, because wickedness was found in the Lord's house. The false prophets of Samaria had led the people into idolatry, and the prophets of Judah were guilty of all kinds of immoralities. Like priests, like people; they all became to the Lord as Sodom, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem like Gomorrah.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The List of Their Sins

One writer gathers the descriptions of these men from across the book into one line.

Adultery, lying, profanity, false dreaming, lightness, and lewdness marked these men. They had become so debased that they were "as Sodom" (Jer. 23:14). "Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, declares the LORD" (Jer. 23:30).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What made this intolerable was the setting. These men were not outsiders; their evil was found in the very place that bore God's name.

"Both prophet and priest are profane; yes, in My house I have found their wickedness, says the Lord. Therefore their way shall be to them like slippery ways in the darkness" (Jer. 23:11-12).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Hands Strengthened, Consciences Silenced

The middle clause explains the damage: these men strengthened the hands of evildoers. One writer sees the same spirit at work whenever God's people go wrong.

When the people of God go wrong, there is always the spirit of false prophecy which would make them believe that all goes well. Men in authority do not like to be discouraged: see the opposition to Jeremiah in Jerusalem. The false prophet helps this along. He keeps the conscience from turning back to God, who would use discipline to bring the conscience into direct contact with Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Jeremiah had already said the people preferred it that way:

"An appalling and horrible thing has happened in the land: the prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction; My people love to have it so" (Jer. 5:30-31).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Like Sodom, Like Gomorrah

The comparison was not a passing insult. Ezekiel makes the same measurement, and Jerusalem comes out worse.

However grievous the sins of Sodom were, and the sins of the ten tribes, they were nothing next to the excesses of the city of Jerusalem. Grieving over the sins of Jerusalem, the Lord said, "Your sister Sodom and her daughters have not done as you and your daughters have done… Samaria has not committed half your sins. You have committed more abominations than they" (Ezek. 16:48, 51).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Even so, God did not sweep everyone away. The same writer points to the ones God spared in each city:

Yet there was a remnant true to God in the middle of the evil. The Lord called to His servants, whom He had appointed to carry out His judgments on the guilty city: "Pass through the city, through Jerusalem, and put a mark on the foreheads of the men who sigh and groan over all the abominations that are committed in it" (Ezek. 9:4). Lot and his daughters were spared from the doom of Sodom: God had His remnant in Jerusalem, marked by Him to escape His consuming judgment.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why a Teacher's Life Matters

The verse ties conduct and message together. A teacher's private life decides what he can say, and what others can hear.

Preach with a good conscience. Keep a clear conscience. A man who does not live carefully cannot rebuke others boldly. He must speak softly, for fear of waking his own guilty conscience. An unholy life in the preacher will either stop his mouth from rebuking, or stop the people's ears from listening.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Position — God found this wickedness in His own house, among prophet and priest. Nearness to holy things did not soften the charge; it sharpened it.

- Practice — Adultery, lying, profanity and lewdness marked these men. Their failure was moral, not merely a matter of wrong teaching.

- Pressure — A guilty conscience cannot rebuke sin. So the corrupt teacher speaks softly, and his soft message keeps others from turning back to God.

- People — The nation loved to have it so, and became what its teachers were: like priests, like people.

- Portion — Measured against Sodom, Jerusalem came out worse. Yet God brought Lot out, and He marked and spared those in Jerusalem who grieved over the evil.

Jeremiah 23:15 · Darby

Therefore thus saith Jehovah of hosts concerning the prophets Behold, I will feed them with wormwood, and make them drink water of gall; for from the prophets of Jerusalem is profaneness gone forth into all the land.

God here passes sentence on the prophets of Jerusalem — the men who claimed to speak for Him — and the sentence is a meal and a drink. Why food and water, and why does the blame start with the prophets rather than the people?

(Where the ESV says "bitter food" and "poisoned water," older translations say "wormwood" and "gall." The writers quoted below use the older words.)

The charge behind the "therefore"

The word "therefore" points back to a reason, and the verse gives it at the end: what spread through the land began with Jerusalem's own prophets. One writer sets their corruption beside the idolatry of the prophets of Samaria, and adds what God told His people to do.

There was absurdity in the idolatrous prophets of Samaria. There was filthiness in the prophets of Jerusalem, when hypocrisy had gone out into all the land. So the LORD of hosts commanded His people not to listen to these prophets. They made the people empty, speaking a vision of their own heart, and not from the mouth of the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What wormwood and gall stand for

Neither image is about literal poison. Scripture uses both words as pictures, and how it uses them explains the threat.

This occurs in Scripture only in a figurative sense. Scripture compares turning to idolatry to a root that bears gall and wormwood, Deuteronomy 29:18. Because of the wickedness of His people, God said He would feed them with wormwood, and give them water of gall to drink, Jeremiah 9:15; Jeremiah 23:15. Jeremiah, mourning over the condition of Israel, compared it to being drunk with wormwood, Lamentations 3:15, 19. At the sounding of the third trumpet in Revelation, a star named Wormwood fell from heaven. A third of the waters turned to wormwood, and many men died from them. The moral sources of life will become destructive.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The sentence fits the sin

These men had promised peace. God's sentence on them is the opposite of the message they sold.

Verses 15-32. They will be fed with wormwood and will have to drink gall. Because of their false message of peace (verses 17, 18), the whirlwind of divine judgment will fall on them and on the head of the wicked. They prophesied lies in the name of Jehovah; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of Jehovah.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the source makes it worse

The verse blames the land's condition on its religious leaders. Writing on the same collapse in Lamentations, one commentator explains why guilt at that point in the system is so serious.

Their sins were glaring, and committed where sin is most hateful and offensive. So God would have had to deny Himself if He had not brought His people down to the dust and scattered them to the ends of the earth. It was "because of the sins of her prophets, the iniquities of her priests, who have shed the blood of the just in her midst." The greater the privilege in having such servants of Jehovah, the more distressing that they should pollute His name and people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same cup at the cross

The word for "gall" turns up again at the cross.

Some very bitter or poisonous plant, not certainly identified. The word stands for "bitterness." God gave His judgements to them as water of gall to drink, Jeremiah 8:14; Jeremiah 9:15; Jeremiah 23:15. Gall was mixed with the sour wine, or vinegar, that the Roman soldiers drank, and given to men about to be crucified. The purpose, it is now thought, was to make them less sensitive to the torture. It was offered to the Lord, but refused, Psalm 69:21; Matthew 27:34.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The same pattern through history

One writer traces the same arrangement through Israel's history: prophets who lie, priests who go along with it, and people who love it that way.

In Jeremiah's writings we find the fullest picture: prophets prophesying lies, and priests going along with the evil so as to rule. "And my people love to have it so; and what will you do in the end?" says the true prophet in his anguish. But throughout Jewish history we see the same principle, from the beginning to the crisis in our Lord's day. God's vengeance is still more terrible on the false teachers. For their greed and well-turned words, they have all along drawn the mass of people away from the truth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. One spring poisoned the land: what went out from the prophets of Jerusalem reached everywhere.

- Spread. Wormwood pictures the moral sources of life turning destructive: the supply itself becomes the poison.

- Sentence. Men who promised peace must eat bitterness instead. The whirlwind falls on the head of those who prophesied out of their own hearts.

- Standing. The higher the privilege of speaking for God, the more distressing the guilt when such men pollute His name and people.

- Sequel. Lying teachers, leaders who go along, hearers who love to have it so — the same pattern runs on through history.

Jeremiah 23:16 · Darby

Thus saith Jehovah of hosts Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you they lead you to vanity; they speak a vision of their own heart, not out of the mouth of Jehovah.

Jeremiah has just condemned the shepherds of God's people and promised a true Shepherd to come. Now he turns to the prophets, and the command about them is blunt: stop listening.

Counterfeits of the Real Thing

False prophets turn up all through the Bible. Their whole method was to look like the real thing. One reference work names what they were for:

Such are described as speaking "a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord." Jer. 23:16. There were three that opposed Jeremiah to his face — Hananiah, Ahab, and Zedekiah... In the New Testament the Lord, early in His ministry, warned His hearers to beware of false prophets, Matt. 7:15; and in the church, the spirits are to be tested, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. 1 John 4:1. They were and are Satan's counterfeits of the prophets of God, and their purpose is, on the principle of imitation, to neutralise the word of God.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

(Older translations render the phrase "a vision of their own heart"; the ESV has "visions of their own minds".)

Where the Message Came From

The verse does not accuse these men of ignorance or bad delivery. It exposes the source of their message. One writer sets this failure against the standard set later in the chapter:

Instead of passing on the Word of the Lord to their hearers, "They speak a vision of their own heart." They do not stand in the council of God and make His people hear His Word (v.22). They go out with their own thoughts instead. How dangerous is that unfaithfulness! It twists or even falsifies the message of God's Word by mixing in one's own opinions. "I did not send these prophets, yet they ran; I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied" (v.21).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Filled With Empty Hope

What did this preaching do to the hearers? It left them empty. One writer sets their cry of peace against the storm on its way, and names the chance they threw away:

So the LORD of hosts commanded His people not to listen to these prophets, who were making them empty. They spoke a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord. Peace, and no evil, they cried — while a whirlwind of the LORD had gone out in fury, to fall heavily on the head of the wicked. They had no authority at all. If they had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What God Saw

The chapter does not leave these men unnoticed. The same writer shows God's own view of them, and what they should have done with His word:

The LORD, who fills heaven and earth, was not ignoring this. He took note of those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why People Wanted to Hear It

A lie this big needs a willing audience. One writer puts the appeal in the listeners, not in the speakers:

It was more popular to prophesy smooth things and deceits. Nothing is so dear to the human heart as having God's approval on its own desires. And so came the popularity of the prophets who would say, "Thus says the Lord," when the Lord had not spoken. We should not think that these prophets were always inventing lies. What they did was corrupt the word of God and make it suit man's taste (2 Cor. 2:17). They had to copy the wording of the real prophets, and yet in the end they only produced their own empty speculations.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

One writer names the power behind such teaching. It is a spirit that works "to hinder the conscience from turning back to God, who would by chastening bring the conscience into direct contact with Him" (J. N. Darby).

The Same Test Now

One writer applies the chapter beyond Judah. He sees these prophets as a picture of teachers who have left the faith and "speak out of the deceit of their hearts" (Arno Clemens Gaebelein). The practical test is short enough to remember:

If ministry is real, it brings God directly to the conscience through the Word. What is false stands between God and the conscience.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. The charge is not poor preaching. It is wrong origin: a message from the speaker's own heart, not from the mouth of the Lord.

- Counterfeit. These men worked by imitation. They borrowed the language of true prophets, and used it to neutralise God's word.

- Appetite. They were popular because the human heart loves to hear God approve its own desires. Smooth words sold; true ones did not.

- Emptiness. Their message left hearers hopeful and unsafe. Had they spoken God's words, the people would have turned from their evil way.

- Test. Real ministry brings God straight to the conscience through the Word. False ministry stands in between. That test still sorts a message today.

Jeremiah 23:17 · Darby

They say constantly unto them that despise me, Jehovah hath said, Ye shall have peace. And they say unto every one that walketh in the stubbornness of his heart, No evil shall come upon you.

Verse 17 is not Jeremiah speaking; it is the message of rival prophets, promising safety to people who despised the Lord's word. It raises the question the chapter turns on: how do you tell God's message from a man's own invention?

What the prophets were promising

One writer sets their comfortable slogan against what God had already set in motion.

So the Lord of hosts commanded His people not to listen to these prophets. They were making the people empty, speaking a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord. Peace, and no evil, they cried, when a whirlwind from the Lord had gone out in fury, to fall heavily on the head of the wicked. They had no authority at all. If they had caused His people to hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where such a message comes from

One reference work traces these prophets through Israel's history and names what stands behind them.

False prophets appeared in large numbers at various times in Israel's history: Ahab had "about four hundred" of them. Such are described as speaking "a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord." Jer. 23:16. Three of them opposed Jeremiah to his face — Hananiah, Ahab, and Zedekiah. They were, and still are, Satan's counterfeits of the prophets of God, and their aim is, by imitation, to cancel out the word of God.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The test: what they promise in bad times

William Kelly names the mark that gives a false message away.

It is always a mark of false prophecies that in a day of evil they promised prosperity. When the people of God have departed from Him, false prophets prophesy smooth things. They have their glowing dreams of progress and of the spread of the Lord's work and blessing. The coming of great things and pleasant things is their unchanging message. A true prophet, by contrast, in the day of evil warns of the coming of the Lord to judge the ungodly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why people wanted to hear it

One writer explains what this comfort does to the conscience, and what it costs those who believe it.

When the people of God go wrong, there is always the spirit of false prophecy that would make them believe all is well. Men in authority do not want to be discouraged. The false prophet helps with this. He keeps the conscience from turning back to God, who would use chastening to bring the conscience into direct contact with Him. The spirit of falsehood would persuade them that they are very happy. Those who call them blessed are the misleaders. Those who are so called, and believe them, are swallowed up.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Standing in the truth

One commentator points to the question God puts to these men.

He asks, "Who has stood in the counsel of the Lord?" Failure has always been a matter of standing in the truth.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The same voices now

One writer applies the verse straight into the present.

There is no shortage of those who prophesy smooth things. In Jeremiah's day some said "Peace, peace" while the Lord's sword hung over the land. We have similar false prophets among us today. If we believe them, the upheavals going on in every area are the birth pangs of a new and better day. All who speak like this are deceivers of men's souls. More to the point are Isaiah's words: "The wicked are like the tossing sea; for it cannot be quiet, and its waters toss up mire and dirt. There is no peace, says my God, for the wicked."

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Another writer turns this into plain rules for anyone who preaches.

Never cover a cracked wall with whitewash, saying, Peace! peace! when there is no peace. Never hurry a soul into confession. Never treat sin lightly. Preach truth as well as grace. Emphasise repentance.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. The message of verse 17 came from the prophets' own hearts, not from the mouth of the Lord. It was imitation, designed to cancel out God's word.

- Timing. The giveaway is prosperity promised in a day of evil; the true prophet in such a day warns of judgment.

- Effect. False peace stops the conscience from turning back to God, and those who believe it are swallowed up.

- Test. Words that truly come from God turn people from their evil way. That result is the measure.

- Today. The same smooth voices speak now; the answer is to preach truth as well as grace, and never to treat sin lightly.

Jeremiah 23:18 · Darby

For who hath stood in the council of Jehovah, so that he hath perceived and heard his word? who hath hearkened to his word and listened?

Jeremiah has just warned Judah not to listen to prophets who promise peace. Now he asks who among them has ever stood where God speaks and truly listened — the question that separates a message received from God from a message a man made up.

The men who never entered the council

The charge against these prophets is not that they were silent. It is that they were busy with words of their own.

Jeremiah next rebuked the prophets (23:9,16). Instead of bringing their hearers the Word of the Lord, "they speak visions of their own minds." Instead of standing in the council of God and making His people hear His Word (v.22), they go out with their own thoughts. How dangerous is the unfaithfulness that twists God's Word, or even makes it false, by mixing in one's own opinions. "I did not send the prophets, yet they ran; I did not speak to them, yet they prophesied" (v.21).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Peace promised, judgment coming

Verse 18 stands between their promise of safety and the storm already on its way.

So the LORD of hosts commanded His people not to listen to the prophets who filled them with empty hopes, speaking a vision of their own heart and not from the mouth of the Lord. "Peace, and no harm," they cried — while a storm from the LORD had already gone out in fury, to fall hard on the head of the wicked. They had no authority at all. If they had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. The LORD, who fills heaven and earth, was not ignoring it. He took note of those who prophesied lies in His name.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Standing in the truth

Older translations spell the word "counsel" where the ESV has "council." One writer reads it as a place to stand in, and says that failing to stand has always been where God's people go wrong.

From verse 9 we have a solemn charge against the prophets who did not stand in the truth. Fleshly living, unreal activity, frivolity and lying marked them, though they spoke in the name of the Lord. He asks, "Who has stood in the counsel of the Lord?"… Standing in the truth is where failure has always come. Ephesians 6 says, "having done all, to stand firm" — and that in the face of unseen powers of darkness.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Who is let in

The question presses further: on what terms is anyone admitted to hear God's word at its source? It is not a matter of office, title, or study.

His secret is with those who fear the Lord. God does not make His mind and the secret of His ways known to all His children, and He does not bring them all into the closeness of friendship — the world far less. Every child of God has the same standing in grace, and enjoys the same life, relationship and favour. But not all enjoy the same closeness with Him. To know the mind of God, one thing is needed. It is not outward standing, or correct position, or deep learning in Scripture, but a spirit and a life soaked in the fear of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

How a hearer can tell the difference

Every one of these men claimed to speak for God. So God gives the hearer a test that does not depend on the speaker.

The false prophets, the godless priests, and all the other dreamers put forward their words to deceive; but the Lord stands by His own words. How? Why should people pay attention to His word? On what ground? On its own power. "What has straw in common with wheat?" (verse 28). Food value decides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same question for anyone who speaks

The same test falls on anyone who speaks to others in God's name.

It is one thing to say a certain amount of true things. It is quite another to be the living channel between the very heart of God and the souls of God's people. This second thing, and this alone, is true ministry… Nothing is sadder or more shameful than listening to a man who is plainly drawing on his own poor and thin resources, or dealing in second-hand truth and borrowed thoughts. Far better for such a man to be silent — better for his hearers, better for himself.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Stand. These prophets never stood in God's council. They went out with their own thoughts and called it His word.

- Hear. That place is not won by position or learning. God gives His secret to a life soaked in the fear of Him.

- Carry. If they had stood there and made the people hear His words, the people would have turned from their evil ways.

- Or fake it. Their cry of "peace" fell apart against the storm already sent, and God took note of every man prophesying lies in His name.

- Test it. God's word proves itself by its own power. You tell straw from wheat by what feeds you.

Jeremiah 23:19 · Darby

Behold, a tempest of Jehovah, fury is gone forth, yea, a whirling storm it shall whirl down upon the head of the wicked.

The words come in the middle of a message against prophets who were telling Judah that all would be well. God answers with a storm already on its way. Who will it hit, and when?

A Storm Set Against a Promise of Peace

Preachers in Jerusalem were promising that nothing bad would happen. This verse is God's reply:

They cried, "Peace, and no evil!" But look: a whirlwind of Jehovah has gone out in fury, to fall heavily on the head of the wicked. They had no authority from Him. If they had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Storm language carries a set meaning across the Old Testament:

The whirlwind is often referred to in the Old Testament as one of the means used by God in His judgements on the earth.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why the Prophets Never Saw It Coming

The men who promised calm had never stood where God makes His plans known. That is the charge running through this part of the chapter:

From verse 9 we have a serious charge against the prophets who did not stand in the truth. They were marked by fleshly living, empty activity, carelessness and lying, though they spoke in the name of the Lord. He asks, "Who has stood in the counsel of the Lord?"

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Their failure cost others. Had they passed on God's words, the people would have turned from their evil way. And God was not indifferent to what they were saying:

Jehovah, who filled heaven and earth, was not ignoring them. He took note of those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who the Wicked Are — Then and Now

The tempest falls first on the men whose message made it necessary. One writer carries that line into our own time:

Because of their false message of peace, the whirlwind of divine judgment will fall upon them and upon the head of the wicked. They prophesied lies in the name of Jehovah; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of Jehovah. This is still the work of apostate teachers today. They speak out of the deceit of their hearts, they prophesy lies, and they aim at the Name which is above every Name.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

False prophecy follows a pattern. It promises good times in the worst days:

It is always a mark of false prophecies that in a day of evil they promised prosperity. When the people of God have departed from Him, false prophets prophesy smooth things. They have their glowing dreams of progress, and of the spread of the Lord's work and blessing... A true prophet, on the contrary, in the day of evil warns of the coming of the Lord to judge the ungodly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Reach of the Tempest

How far does this storm reach? Commentators say it goes beyond the prophet's own day:

Many places in the Old Testament speak of the same thing (see Jeremiah 23:16-21). The expression "the latter days" takes us right on to the end. No doubt such things existed in the prophet's days, but the passage looks forward to a yet future day.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Anger That Finishes Its Work

The storm is not a loss of temper. It runs until God's purpose is done, and even its severity aims at a good end:

The history of God's earthly people shows His ways of discipline, with nations and with people alike. God always has our profit in view. We see this again in the prophecy of Jeremiah: "The anger of the LORD will not turn back until He has executed and accomplished the intents of His heart. In the latter days you will understand it clearly."

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Summary

- Storm. God answers a false promise of peace with a whirlwind. The Old Testament often uses it as a picture of His judgment on the earth.

- Source. The prophets never stood in God's counsel, so they never saw the storm coming. Had they passed on His words, the people would have turned.

- Target. It bursts on "the head of the wicked" — first on teachers who prophesy out of their own hearts. Writers say that pattern continues wherever preachers promise smooth things in a day of evil.

- Reach. Such things happened in the prophet's own day, but the phrase "the latter days" carries the passage forward to a day still ahead.

- Result. The anger does not turn back until it has done what God intended. Even His severest dealings have His people's profit in view.

Jeremiah 23:20 · Darby

The anger of Jehovah shall not return, until he have executed, and until he have performed the purposes of his heart at the end of the days ye shall understand it clearly.

These words close a warning against prophets who told Judah that no disaster was coming. God's anger will not turn back until He has finished what He intends. Two questions press: why does judgment run its full course, and why can it only be understood "in the latter days"?

The storm and the men who denied it

These prophets promised safety. The storm was already on its way.

Jehovah of hosts commanded His people not to listen to these prophets, who made them empty. They spoke a vision from their own heart, not from the mouth of the Lord. Peace, and no evil, they cried — while a whirlwind from Jehovah has gone out in fury, to fall hard on the head of the wicked. They had no authority at all. Had they made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same work goes on today.

They gave a false message of peace (verses 17, 18). So the whirlwind of divine judgment will fall on them and on the head of the wicked. They prophesied lies in the name of Jehovah; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of Jehovah. This is still the work of apostate teachers today. They speak out of the deceit of their hearts. They prophesy lies. They take aim at the Name which is above every name.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A heart behind the hand

"The intents of his heart" is the surprising phrase. Anger and heart stand side by side in one sentence.

It may be surprising to read of the heart when the Lord carries out His anger. But have we not often heard that there is a heart behind the hand? The verse above teaches this. It also tells us more. In the latter days Israel will look back and understand God's ways with them, above all His love for them.

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

Judgment runs its full course

So when does the anger stop? One writer marks the point: judgment complete, then blessing.

It is at the completion of the predicted judgments on the wicked, both in Israel and among the nations, which prophecy treats so fully. … "At the same time, says the Lord, I will be the God of all the families of Israel, and they shall be my people." Can anything be more explicit and decisive than this?

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

"In the latter days"

The phrase is not a vague way of saying "later on." It is a fixed expression, and its use elsewhere sets its meaning here.

"The last," or "latter days," is an expression with a very distinct prophetic connection. It occurs just 14 times (Genesis 49:1; Numbers 24:14; Deuteronomy 4:30; Isaiah 2:2; Jeremiah 23:20; Jeremiah 30:24; Daniel 2:28; Hosea 3:5; Micah 4:1, and others). In all of them the reference is to the closing scenes of Jacob's time of trouble and the setting up of the Millennial kingdom. A study of the context of these passages will show it.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Jacob is another name for Israel, so those closing scenes are the nation's last great crisis. Yet the verse still spoke to Jeremiah's own hearers.

Many places in the Old Testament speak of the same thing (see Jeremiah 23:16-21). The expression "the latter days" takes us right on to the end. No doubt such things existed in the prophet's days, but the passage looks forward to a day still future.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Understanding that comes afterward

The verse says they "will understand it clearly." Older translations read "consider it perfectly." The understanding comes after the suffering, not during it.

This verse reminds us of the 12th chapter of Hebrews. There we Christians stand under the Father's disciplining hand. How often the apostle's words have been an encouragement: "For the Lord disciplines the one he loves" (Hebrews 12:6). They seem to line up with the "heart" in the verse quoted above. "For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it" (Hebrews 12:11). In the latter days Israel will consider their years of suffering perfectly. In the same way, may our trials train us, so that we find they have truly been for our good.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Prophets cried peace out of their own hearts; the whirlwind was already out. Had they given God's words, they would have turned people from their evil way.

- Heart. There is a heart behind the hand. The anger carries out "the intents of His heart," not a mood.

- Full course. God's anger runs to its end first. Only then: "I will be the God of all the families of Israel."

- Reach. "The latter days" is a fixed Old Testament phrase. It points past Jeremiah's day to the end of Jacob's trouble and the kingdom to come.

- Result. Israel will look back and understand God's ways, His love included. Hebrews 12 promises the same "afterward" to everyone God trains.

Jeremiah 23:21 · Darby

I did not send the prophets, yet they ran; I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied.

God's charge here is not against men who spoke against Him. It is against men who claimed to speak for Him — busy, but never sent, and carrying a message He never gave.

Activity that was never commanded

They were busy, and they were not sent. Both were true at once of men who claimed to serve God.

The Lord had to say of those who professed to serve Him, "I did not send the prophets, yet they ran." Plenty of activity — yet the Lord had not sent them there. His will should have been enough for them. They claimed to be His servants. Yet they did their own will, dreamed their own dreams, chose their own messages, and in truth "forsook God who made" them. God made them for what? Surely to be the instrument of His will, the vessel of His pleasure, the witness to His Name.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

Where the message came from instead

If God had not spoken to them, they still had to find something to say.

They do not pass on the Word of the Lord to their hearers. "They speak a vision of their own heart." They should stand in the council of God and cause His people to hear His Word (v. 22). Instead, they go out according to their own thoughts. How dangerous is that unfaithfulness! It warps or even falsifies the message of God's Word by bringing in one's own opinions.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Their message soothed the people while judgment was on its way. God's own words would have done the opposite.

They cried peace and no evil, while a whirlwind from the Lord had gone out in fury, to fall heavily on the head of the wicked. They had no authority at all. If they had caused His people to hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. The Lord fills heaven and earth. He was not ignoring them. He marked those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The test: standing in His counsel

Their words were only the symptom. The root lay further back.

From verse 9 we have a solemn charge against the prophets who did not stand in the truth. Carnality, unreal activity, lightness and lying marked them, though they spoke in the name of the Lord. He asks, "Who has stood in the counsel of the Lord?" Failure has always come at this one point: standing in the truth.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

No one appoints himself

No one could make himself a prophet.

God alone could make, and fit, and send a prophet. Sadly, the Lord had to say of some, "I did not send them, yet they ran." They were unholy intruders into the field of prophecy, just as others intruded into the priesthood. All such brought down on themselves the judgment of God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Men can be put into ministry by other men, or they can put themselves there. One writer counts the second as worse.

We must be able, through grace, to prove in our ministry that we are sent. I do not believe in anyone being self-sent. I do not believe in self-appointed servants. That kind of thing is just as bad as people-made ministers, if not worse. One of the most miserable beings in this world is a man-made minister. But it is far worse for a man to hold no commission except from himself. That is the worst of all — it is consecrated self-will.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

The warning turned on ourselves

The warning has a bright side for anyone God really does send.

We need to have our eye on God alone. If He sends us, all is well; then we may gladly go without a fear or a question. But woe to the one who runs unsent. The Lord had to say of other prophets, "I did not send the prophets, yet they ran." Let us beware of such work done in the name of the Lord! We all need to take the warning home to ourselves.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent, not self-starting. God alone makes, fits and sends His messengers. Whoever runs without that sending is an intruder.

- Spoken, not invented. God had not spoken to them. So their message could only come from their own heart and their own thoughts.

- Standing, not stirring. They never stood in His counsel. Unreal activity took its place, and that failure returns in every age.

- Turning, not talking. God's test is the result. His own words would have turned the people from their evil way.

- Warned, not frozen. The warning is against self-will, not against service. If He sends you, go gladly and without fear.

Jeremiah 23:22 · Darby

But if they had stood in my council, and had caused my people to hear my words, then would they have turned them from their evil way and from the wickedness of their doings.

Jeremiah 23 is a long charge against the prophets of Judah, and this verse is God's test of them: not what they claimed, but what their words did to their hearers. So what does it mean to stand in God's council, and how do you tell a message from God from a message from a man?

Standing in God's council

The chapter turns on one word: standing. The prophets did not stand in the truth, and the same standing is asked of every believer.

It is for the believer to know the truth which sanctifies him, and to stand in it. From verse 9 we have a solemn indictment against the prophets who did not stand in the truth. They were worldly, their activity was unreal, they took holy things lightly, and they lied — yet they spoke in the name of the Lord. He asks who among them has stood in the council of the Lord. If they had stood there, and had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. Failure has always come at just this point: standing in the truth.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

No commission behind the voice

These men prophesied in the Lord's name. What they did not have was any commission from Him, and the missing result proved it.

They had no authority at all. If they had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. The Lord, who fills heaven and earth, was not indifferent; He took note of those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Their own thoughts in place of His words

The failure was not silence. They spoke — but the content was theirs.

Instead of standing in the council of God and causing His people to hear His Word (v. 22), they go forth according to their own thoughts. Unfaithfulness like this is dangerous. It twists the message of God's Word, or even falsifies it, by bringing in one's own opinions.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Why God's word turns people

God ties His words to a result in the hearer. That result is the word's own work when it truly enters the soul.

When the word of God really enters our souls, it produces a moral effect, and it does so by its own force, because it is the word of God. It commands, and more than that, it causes repentance. It passes the sentence of death on man in his natural state. It makes the sinner bow to that sentence... So repentance comes, and the sinner turns to God.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

One writer points to a place where that turning actually happened. Nineveh was a pagan city, yet it turned, while God's own people, with far more light, did not.

The king of Nineveh led the way in the humbling he called for, and he added that everyone was to turn from his evil way and from the violence in his hands. Then we read that God saw their works, and that they turned from their evil way. How very sad it is to see God's people Israel, who were just as evil as the Ninevites but with less excuse, since they had more light, reject God's offers of mercy and refuse to turn from their evil ways.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The same test now

A call to preach can come from people rather than from God.

Nowadays we hear people talk about having a call to the ministry, tied to this or that group, and the call is supposed to be from the Lord. But it is more often from a congregation of unconverted men, and the man called is anything but a child of God. Yet since they take this place, the Lord holds them responsible for the position.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

If the mark of a true message is that hearers turn from evil, preaching must aim at that.

Never cover a cracked wall with whitewash, saying, Peace, peace, when there is no peace. Never hurry a soul into confession. Never treat sin lightly. Preach truth as well as grace. Emphasize repentance.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Stand — the verse hangs on standing in God's council. That is where servants of God have always failed.

- Sent — these prophets had no commission from God. He still holds people responsible for a place they take on their own.

- Speak — those who do not stand in His council speak their own thoughts. Their own opinions twist God's message, or even falsify it.

- Turn — God's word carries moral force. It makes the sinner bow, causes repentance, and turns him to God.

- Test — Nineveh turned with little light; God's own people refused with much. The honest measure of any ministry is whether hearers leave their evil way.

Jeremiah 23:23 · Darby

Am I a God at hand, saith Jehovah, and not a God afar off?

Jeremiah aims this question at prophets who passed off their own thoughts as the word of the Lord. Behind it lies a simpler question: is God small enough to fool, so that a person can sin unseen?

The Setting: Prophets Who Assumed God Was Not Listening

The chapter runs from a promise of a coming righteous King to a charge against the men who claimed to speak for God. What they offered came from themselves, not from Him:

Instead of passing on the Word of the Lord to their hearers, "They speak visions of their own minds." They should have stood in the council of God and made His people hear His Word (v.22). Instead they go out according to their own thoughts. How dangerous is that unfaithfulness! It twists or even falsifies the message of God's Word by bringing in one's own opinions.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The question is God's own reply to those prophets:

Jehovah filled heaven and earth. He was not indifferent: He took note of those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not a God Who Can Be Placed

The question exposes an idea of God shrunk to a location. He is the One who sets limits on everything else and has none Himself:

God, who bounds everything else, is Himself without bounds. He sets bounds to the sea: "Thus far shall you come, and no farther." He sets bounds to the angels; they, like the cherubim, move and stand at His appointment (Ezek. 10:16). But He is infinite, without bounds. He who can span the heavens and weigh the earth in scales must be infinite (Isa. 40:22). "Do I not fill heaven and earth?" (Jer. 23:24). The humble heart is His throne, as regards His gracious presence (Isa. 57:15); and heaven is His throne, as regards His glorious presence (Isa. 66:1); and yet neither of these thrones will hold Him, for the highest heaven cannot contain Him.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Commentators are careful about how this is understood. One writer puts it this way:

As to omnipresence, God has no more to do with space than with time. He has created all things in a way we can grasp. In this creation nothing escapes Him. He is, morally speaking, omnipresent. He is not of it, or in it, but pervades it. He is "through all"! He upholds everything, as He creates everything.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

No Secret Place

The next verse presses this into the conscience. It reaches the person whose neighbours suspect nothing:

Jeremiah might well say, "Can a man hide himself in secret places so that I cannot see him? declares the LORD." The thief and the perjurer might flatter themselves that their wrongdoing was unknown. They had managed to cover it from every human eye. They might even be mixing with their neighbours without a known stain on their character. They might have gone further and said, "The LORD does not see; the God of Jacob does not perceive."

after_note: DELETE But "He who planted the ear, does He not hear? He who formed the eye, does He not see?" (Psalm 94:7, 9.)

Edward Dennett

Near, and Yet Held at a Distance

Under the old order, God's answer to His own question carried both sides at once. He wanted to live among His people, but the terms of that nearness kept them back:

From the moment God redeemed Israel out of Egypt to be His people, He had made known His desire to dwell among them. Yet under the conditions that then existed He had to veil Himself in fire and cloud and awesome majesty. Man had to keep his distance. This was so with Moses, and with Aaron and his sons. It was so with Solomon too. He finished the Temple, and yet the priests could not enter, for the glory of the Lord filled the House. It was nearness in one sense, but distance in another.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The Answer Given in Jesus

The same writer finds the full answer in a person:

We open the New Testament, and all is changed. At once we meet JESUS, who is EMMANUEL, which means, "God with us." Here we have something entirely new. He who once dwelt in the devouring fire on Sinai was now among men in perfect manhood and in lowly grace. The One who is light, and who dwells in unapproachable light, had now appeared. He softened the piercing rays of His glory so that human eyes could take them in.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What It Changes in Daily Life

How we speak and behave shows how much we really live in God's presence:

All these things give sad proof of how little we live, move and have our being in the presence of God. If we could only keep in mind that God hears us and sees us! He hears our every word. He sees our every thought and every way. How differently we would carry ourselves! What holy watchfulness we would keep over our thoughts, our tempers and our tongues!

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Near — the question answers prophets who passed off their own thoughts as God's word.

- Nearer — He sets the limits of sea and angels, and has none Himself. The highest heaven cannot contain Him.

- Nearest — He fills heaven and earth, so the sin no neighbour suspects is already in full view.

- Near, yet veiled — under the old order God wanted to dwell among His people. He came in fire and cloud, so man kept his distance.

- God with us — in Jesus the distance closes. He softened His glory so that human eyes could take it in.

Jeremiah 23:24 · Darby

Can any hide himself in secret places, that I shall not see him? saith Jehovah. Do not I fill the heavens and the earth? saith Jehovah.

Jeremiah 23 charges men who claimed to speak for God while inventing their own message. God answers them with two questions, not an argument. No dark corner hides anyone from His eye. He fills heaven and earth. So every secret word and hidden act was always spoken and done in front of Him.

The men being addressed

The question is aimed at prophets who ran without being sent. Their failure was not weak delivery but substituted content.

Jeremiah next reproached the prophets (23:9,16). Instead of passing on the Word of the Lord to their hearers, "they speak visions of their own minds." They should have stood in the council of God and made His people hear His Word (v.22). Instead they go out according to their own thoughts. How dangerous is that unfaithfulness! It twists or even falsifies the message of God's Word by bringing in one's own opinions. "I did not send the prophets, yet they ran; I did not speak to them, yet they prophesied" (v.21).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

No secret place

Hidden sin rests on one assumption: what people cannot see stays hidden. One writer applies the verse to the thief and the man who swears falsely.

The thief and the man who swears falsely might flatter themselves that their sin was unknown. They think they have covered it from every human eye. They might even mix with their neighbours without a known stain on their character. They might have gone further and said, "The LORD does not see; the God of Jacob does not perceive." But "He who planted the ear, does he not hear? He who formed the eye, does he not see?" (Psalm 94:7, 9.) Sooner or later this verse warns all such people that their false security will be shaken.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The self-deception is not only in criminals. It sits in the ordinary heart that keeps up appearances before people.

The very thing God is dealing with us ALL about is the thought, "no eye will see me." A man can care about his character before people while not caring what God thinks. A man who would not cheat other people is cheating God all the time. We cannot, in reality; He knows it all.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Filling heaven and earth

The second question rests on what God is in Himself. He sets limits on everything else and has none of His own. And this same limitless God makes a lowly heart His seat.

God, who sets bounds to everything else, is Himself without bounds. He sets bounds to the sea: "Thus far shall you come, and no farther." He sets bounds to the angels; they, like the cherubim, move and stand at His appointment (Ezek. 10:16). But He is infinite, without bounds. He who can span the heavens, and weigh the earth in scales, must be infinite (Isa. 40:22). "Do I not fill heaven and earth?" (Jer. 23:24). The humble heart is His throne, as regards His gracious presence (Isa. 57:15). Heaven is His throne, as regards His glorious presence (Isa. 66:1). Yet neither of these thrones will hold Him, for the heaven of heavens cannot contain Him.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Filling heaven and earth is not a figure of speech about influence. It means there is no location where God has to arrive.

In omnipresence there is the presence of God in every place. If it be heaven, He is there; it is His home. And earth: "Do not I fill heaven and earth? says the Lord" (Jer. 23:24). "Hell is naked before Him" (Job 26:6; Psalm 139:8). God is everywhere: He fills all places at all times. He fills space, earth, sea, and land. He fills our homes; with Him there can be no in and out, nor above and beneath.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

The same truth as comfort

For someone who trusts God, the eye that finds everything is not a threat but a service. What He uncovers, He uncovers to remove.

After all, dear friends, is it not a blessed thing to know that nothing can escape either the hand or eye of God? What a comfort that He discerns every thought of our hearts that would hinder blessing, or dim communion with Himself! Some secret evil may be working in my heart while I stay unaware of it. It may be one of the ten thousand things that, if indulged, would hinder the enjoyment of God. Well, God sends some circumstance that shows me the evil, so that it can be put away.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Strength to stand

The chapter blames prophets who would not stand where God speaks. For the believer who does stand, these two questions give strength.

Failure at all times has been about standing in the truth. Ephesians 6 says, "having done all, TO STAND FIRM," and that is in the face of unseen powers of darkness. Let us remember the word of the prophet, and we shall be strong to stand in the truth: "Can a man hide himself in secret places so that I cannot see him? declares the LORD. Do I not fill heaven and earth? declares the LORD" (v. 24). We are to be strong in Him, not in ourselves; not in self-confidence, but in the Lord.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The verse answers prophets who ran unsent and preached their own thoughts under God's name.

- Reach. God sets bounds to everything else and has none Himself; He fills heaven and earth, and the heaven of heavens cannot hold Him.

- Exposure. Hidden sin only fools people. The man who guards his good name while cheating God fools nobody but himself.

- Comfort. For the believer the searching eye is mercy: He shows up the secret evil so that it can be put away.

- Result. Remember these two questions and you will stand in the truth — strong in the Lord, not in yourself.

Jeremiah 23:25 · Darby

I have heard what the prophets say, who prophesy falsehood in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed.

God has been listening. Men were using His name to sell what came out of their own sleep, and the chapter asks how anyone can tell a dream from a word from God.

Nothing Hidden From God

These men spoke with no commission from God. That did not keep their words out of His hearing.

They had no authority at all. If they had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. The Lord, who fills heaven and earth, was not inattentive, but noted those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the Lie Sold So Well

These men had an eager audience. People wanted comfort, and they wanted God's name on it.

It was more popular to prophesy smooth things and lies. Nothing is so dear to the human heart as having God's approval on its own desires. That is why the prophets who would say, "Thus says the Lord," when the Lord had not spoken, were so popular. These prophets were not always inventing lies. They corrupted the word of God and made it suit man's taste.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Source of the Dream

These dreams had a source, and it was not heaven. What came out of the man's own heart still went out under God's name.

They prophesied lies in the name of the Lord; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of the Lord. This is still the work of teachers who have abandoned the truth. They speak out of the deceit of their hearts, they prophesy lies, and they aim at the Name which is above every Name. How different the word of the Lord is from the idle dreams of these false prophets! Three times the Lord declares that He is against these prophets.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Witnesses and Counterfeits

These dream-claims were not isolated. False prophets grew in number at the very time God was raising up true witnesses.

This testimony of the Lord against the prophets increased as the falling away set in. The nearer the ruin came — and this is how His grace works — the more testimony He raised about it. But as God multiplied His witnesses, the prophets of the people multiplied too.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Chaff or Wheat

Later in the same chapter God gives the sorting question: chaff, or wheat? (Where older translations read "chaff," the ESV has "straw.") You weigh a dream and a word by what they hold, not by the standing of the speaker.

The false prophets, the godless priests, and all the other dreamers put forward their words to deceive. But the Lord stands by His own words. Why should anyone pay attention to His word? On one ground: its own power. "What is the chaff to the wheat?" Food value decides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same test falls on anyone who stands up to speak for God.

Preach the truth. Take care not to give your own dreams and fancies in God's name. All is chaff except the pure word of God. Oh, do not stamp God's image on your own coin!

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Dreams and Claims Today

A dream that comes true is still not proof. The law had already settled this, and the New Testament repeats the warning.

Such dreamers are grouped with false prophets. Possibly it was a hypnotic state that evil spirits could use, with the aim of turning the people from the Lord to idolatry. Even if what they prophesied came true, the people must not listen to them: God allowed it as a test, to prove whether Israel loved the Lord. Deuteronomy 13:1-5. We have the same caution in the New Testament about the gospel and the confession of Jesus Christ come in flesh. Galatians 1:8-9; 1 John 4:1.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. God is not a bystander when men speak in His name. He fills heaven and earth, so every such claim is already on His record.

- Homegrown. The dream did not come down from God; it came out of the speaker's own deceitful heart, and it left God's name forgotten.

- Wanted. Smooth things sell. Nothing is dearer to the human heart than God's approval on what it already wants. So the false prophet finds an easy audience.

- Weighed. The word is not judged by the speaker; the speaker is judged by the word. Chaff or wheat — food value decides.

- Faithfully. The man who has God's word has one job: speak it as it is. Never stamp God's image on your own coin.

Jeremiah 23:26 · Darby

How long shall [this] be in the heart of the prophets who prophesy falsehood, and who are prophets of the deceit of their own heart?

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jeremiah 23:27 · Darby

who think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal.

Judah's prophets kept telling each other their dreams. God says what those dreams are meant to do — make His people forget His name, just as their fathers lost that name for Baal.

Why the dreams found an audience

These prophets never opposed God openly. One writer explains their popularity by what their hearers wanted to hear.

But the weight of that influence was quickly turned against God. It was more popular to prophesy smooth things and lies. Nothing is so dear to the human heart as having God's approval for its own desires. That is why the prophets who would say, "Thus says the Lord," when the Lord had not spoken, were so popular. We should not suppose these prophets were always inventing lies. They corrupted the word of God and made it suit man's taste (2 Cor. 2:17). They had to copy the real prophets in many of their phrases. Yet in the end they produced only their own empty ideas.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The target is the Name

The dreams were not aimed at a doctrine. They were aimed at God's name, and one writer sees the same aim in teachers today.

They prophesied lies in the name of the Lord; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of the Lord. That is still the work today of teachers who have abandoned the faith. They speak out of the deceit of their hearts, they prophesy lies, and they aim at the Name which is above every name. How different the word of the Lord is from the idle dreams of these false prophets.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

God's test for a dreamer

The verse points back to a generation that lost the Name for an idol. One writer notes the test God allowed for such dreamers — a test that ignores whether the dream comes true.

Such dreamers are classed with false prophets. It may have been a hypnotic state that evil spirits could use, with the aim of turning the people from the Lord to idolatry. Even if what they prophesied came true, no one was to listen to them on that account. God allowed the test to prove whether Israel loved the Lord (Deut. 13:1-5). The New Testament gives us the same caution about the gospel and about confessing that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh (Gal. 1:8-9; 1 John 4:1). In Jer. 27:9 the dreamers are grouped with diviners.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So accuracy was never the test.

Where the dreams came from

God calls these men prophets of the deceit of their own heart. One writer shows what they gave people instead of God's Word.

Instead of passing on the Word of the Lord to their hearers, "They speak a vision of their own heart." They should have stood in the council of God and made His people hear His Word (v.22). Instead they go out with their own thoughts. How dangerous is that unfaithfulness! It twists, or even falsifies, the message of God's Word by bringing in a person's own opinions.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Chaff and wheat

Two verses later God asks what straw has in common with wheat. One writer takes that question as the answer to a practical one: why trust God's word over a striking dream?

The false prophets, the ungodly priests, and all the other dreamers put forward their words to deceive. But the Lord stands by His own words. How? Why should they pay attention to it? On what ground? On the power it has in itself. "What is the chaff to the wheat?" (verse 28). Food value decides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer measures what he has read by that test.

I have never read a tradition that was not obviously chaff. I have never read a thought that came from man that was not worthless in the things of God. Give me something of God, and the moment my faith lays hold of the mind of God I have the wheat. In other words, the truth of God is not a matter of historical research. It is something that suits a plain man much better, and right away. What would become of the poor and the simple if they had to make long investigations to find out what the word of God was?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Taste — Smooth words sell. Nothing is dearer to the human heart than God's approval on its own desires. That appetite gave the dream-prophets their platform.

- Source — They spoke a vision of their own heart. Bringing your own opinions into God's message does not add to it; it falsifies it.

- Target — The aim was never a mistaken doctrine but a forgotten Name. Writers see the same aim in teachers today who strike at the Name above every name.

- Test — A dream coming true proves nothing. God allowed such things to prove whether His people loved Him. Judge a message by where it takes you, not by how impressive it looks.

- Table — Feeding value tells straw from wheat, no research needed. God's word carries its own power, so the poor and the simple can hold it as firmly as anyone.

Jeremiah 23:28 · Darby

The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell the dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith Jehovah.

Jeremiah 23 sets two speakers side by side: men who tell their own dreams in God's name, and the man who has God's word. What tells them apart is not confidence but food value: straw, or wheat (older translations say "chaff," the word the writers below use).

Dreams told in God's name

These prophets promised peace while judgment was on its way. They spoke from their own heart, and the result proved it: no one turned from evil.

Jehovah of hosts therefore commanded His people not to listen to the prophets who made them empty. These men spoke a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the Lord. Peace, and no evil, they cried; when a whirlwind of Jehovah has gone out in fury, to fall heavily on the head of the wicked. They had no authority at all. If they had caused His people to hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. Jehovah, who fills heaven and earth, marked those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why food value settles it

God does not argue for His word here. He points to what it does: it feeds.

The false prophets, the profane priests, and all the other dreamers brought forward their words to deceive. But the Lord stands by His own utterances. And how? Why should they take heed to it? On what ground? On its own intrinsic power. "What is the chaff to the wheat?" (verse 28). Nutritive value decides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The test needs no training — only hunger.

There is one excellent way of meeting a man when he is hungry. Give him a piece of bread, and he knows it is bread. He may never have seen that kind of bread before, and may never have tasted it, but he is convinced it is bread. Give him a piece of board, and he knows this is not bread. By human learning a man may be very ignorant. Yet God guards even the simplest of His people with a practical test. "What is chaff to the wheat?" The truth of God always commends itself to the consciences of those who hear it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What counts as chaff

Chaff is not only open lies. It is anything of a man's own that carries God's name.

Preach the truth. Take care not to give your own dreams and fancies in God's name. All is chaff except the pure word of God. Oh, do not stamp God's image on your own coin! We live in high-flown times. Many people are not content with truths that lie plainly in the Scriptures. To please their restless tastes, some have refined their notions so high that they have flown out of sight of the Scripture. Without realising it, they have run themselves and others into dangerous errors. Do not make experiments on the souls of people by delivering what is doubtful. Better to feed people with sound doctrine, even if it is a plain meal. The exotic dish may hit on a wild gourd that brings death into their pot.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Faithfully means definitely

"Faithfully" rules out more than lying. It also rules out vagueness, and language too fine for ordinary people to follow.

When teaching stops being definite, it stops being powerful; for it stops being truth that is taught. All truth is definite, or it stops being truth. Teaching that swerves from this may not stop being exciting or attractive, but it stops building people up. The man who deals out truth that is uncertain and undefined first takes the chaff for the wheat himself. Then he works the same deception on others. Every teacher who is in earnest has a plain duty: to present truth in the plainest, most unadorned dress, and to unfold it in words that ordinary minds can follow.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The fan is never turned on Scripture

The verse separates God's word from man's. It does not invite anyone to sift God's word for human errors inside it.

They talk to us about a human element in inspiration. They speak of the divine truth and of the human instrument that carried it, as though truth and error were mixed together. Then, to use the illustration of a popular preacher, you would have to take your winnowing fan and fan the chaff out of the wheat. No, God's precious word is pure grain; there is no chaff there. It is the fan that separates the precious from the vile in our lives, ways and hearts, but man cannot judge it.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Having the word and staying silent

The command also reaches the quiet man. If God has given you something, keeping it to yourself is not faithful speaking.

Sometimes those who should speak and give out what they have of real profit are silent. To such the word is: "let him who has my word speak my word faithfully" (Jer. 23:28).

Modernised from Raymond K. CampbellOriginal wording

Summary

- Wheat has a source. The false prophets spoke a vision of their own heart, not out of the mouth of the Lord. God's own words would have turned the people from their evil way.

- Wheat feeds. God rests His word's claim on its own power. Food value decides which is chaff and which is grain.

- Wheat is obvious. A hungry man knows bread from a board. The same test guards the simplest believer, and it needs no learning.

- Wheat is not blended. All is chaff except the pure word of God. Do not stamp God's image on your own coin, or experiment on souls with what is doubtful.

- Wheat must be handed out. Speak it plainly and definitely — and if you have it, do not sit silent.

Jeremiah 23:29 · Darby

Is not my word like a fire, saith Jehovah; and like a hammer [that] breaketh the rock in pieces?

Jeremiah stands against a crowd of prophets who told their own dreams and called them a message from God. The Lord does not argue with them. He asks two questions instead, and points to what His word does.

Dreams Against the Word

This verse closes a long charge against men who spoke in God's name when God had not sent them. One writer sets the fire and the hammer against what those prophets were selling, and notes what the Lord says next:

They prophesied lies in the name of Jehovah; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of Jehovah. Teachers who have abandoned the truth still do this work today. They speak out of the deceit of their hearts. They prophesy lies. They attack the Name that is above every name. How different is the word of the Lord from the idle dreams of these false prophets. "Is not my word like fire, declares the LORD, and like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces?" (verse 29). Three times the Lord declares He is against these prophets (verses 30-32).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Chaff and Wheat

God offers no outside proof for His word. The question just before this one — chaff or wheat — makes the word its own evidence:

The false prophets, the godless priests, and all the other dreamers brought forward their words to deceive. But the Lord stands by His own words. And how? Why should they take heed to it? On what ground? On its own intrinsic power. "What is the chaff to the wheat?" (verse 28). Nutritive value decides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The test is within reach of people with no training at all:

There is one very good way of meeting a man when he is hungry. Give him a piece of bread, and he knows perfectly well it is bread. He may never have seen that kind of bread before, and may never have tasted it, but he is convinced it is bread. Give him a piece of board, and he knows this is not bread. So, by the standards of human learning, a man may know almost nothing. Yet God guards even the simplest of His people with a practical test. "What is chaff to the wheat?" The truth of God always commends itself to the consciences of those who hear it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Hammer and the Rock

The rock in the picture is a heart that will not yield. One writer sets two men side by side. One needed the blow. The other did not:

The heart of man is hard towards God by nature... Jeremiah 23:29 likens God's Word to a hammer. The jailer at Philippi needed the hammer when Paul and Silas first dealt with him. King Josiah did not. His heart was already tender.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Another writer describes that blow landing in his own life:

As I read, I said to myself: No one on earth knows me as I know myself. But the Author of this Book knows me far better than I know myself. I felt that God was speaking. I found myself under His all-seeing eye, and I fell at His feet. The hammer of His Word had broken the hard rock to pieces.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

One Word, Two Effects

Wheat, fire and hammer are not rival pictures. They show one word doing different work on different ground:

Jeremiah 23:28-29 compares the word to wheat. Strangely, it also compares it to fire and to a hammer breaking the rock in pieces. God can use His word to feed or to break hard hearts!

Modernised from Scripture QuarterlyOriginal wording

Jeremiah himself had already felt the fire. One writer describes what kept him speaking under constant mockery:

He was the target of constant mockery. They watched for him to stumble, so he would gladly have kept silent. But the word of Jehovah was like fire in his bones... We understand how at such times the word in us is too strong to be shut up in our heart.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Speak It Faithfully

If the power is in the word itself, then the messenger's one duty is to hand it over unaltered:

It would be unfaithfulness and dishonesty, as well as a real breach of love, not to say what the Lord says. To modify or alter it would be dishonest. "Let him who has My word speak My word faithfully," He Himself says.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Chaff — Weigh the dreams of false prophets against God's word and they turn out to be husks. Food value settles it, not credentials.

- Wheat — The word feeds, and it proves itself by feeding. A hungry man knows bread from a plank, so God guards even the simplest believer.

- Fire — The same word burns. It burned in Jeremiah until he had to speak, even when mockery made him want to stay silent.

- Hammer — Where a heart is rock, the word breaks it. Some, like Josiah, are already tender; others need the blow before they fall at God's feet.

- Faithfully — The power is in the word, not in the speaker. So changing it or watering it down is dishonesty. Hand it over as it stands.

Jeremiah 23:30 · Darby

Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith Jehovah, that steal my words every one from his neighbour.

In Jeremiah 23 the Lord turns on the men who claimed to speak for Him, and says He is against them for taking words He never gave them. So what is the difference between passing on God's word and helping yourself to someone else's?

The prophets under judgment

Before the "I am against" comes a description of what these men were doing. They promised peace while God's judgment was already on the way.

So the Lord of hosts commanded His people not to listen to the prophets who made them empty. Those prophets spoke a vision of their own heart, not words from the mouth of the Lord. Peace, and no evil, they cried, when a whirlwind of the Lord has gone out in fury, to fall heavily on the head of the wicked. They had no authority at all. If they had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. The Lord, who filled heaven and earth, was not indifferent; He marked those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What stealing His words means

Theft is a strange word for preaching. These men did not have to invent everything. They picked up the language of the true prophets and reused it for their own ends.

It was more popular to prophesy smooth and deceitful things. Nothing is so dear to the human heart as having God's approval for its own desires. That is why people loved the prophets who said, "Thus says the Lord," when the Lord had not spoken. These prophets were not always inventing lies. They corrupted the word of God and made it suit man's taste (2 Corinthians 2:17). They had to imitate the real prophets in many of their expressions. Yet in the end they only produced their own empty speculations.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three times over

Verse 30 is not the only "I am against" in this chapter. The same charge falls three times, and it still fits people who speak for God today.

They prophesied lies in the name of the Lord; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the name of the Lord. The same is true today of teachers who have abandoned the faith. They speak out of the deceit of their hearts, they prophesy lies, and they take aim at the Name that is above every name. How different is the word of the Lord from the idle dreams of these false prophets. Three times the Lord declares He is against these prophets (verses 30-32).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

How to tell the real thing

If borrowed words can sound identical to God's words, how would anyone tell them apart? God's word needs no one to vouch for it.

And this book, like every work of God, shows itself for what it is. It is its own witness. "Is not my word like fire, declares the LORD, and like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces?" All other words stand in contrast — all words or writings that are not His. Of them the Lord says, "What is the chaff to the wheat?" (Jeremiah 23).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

(Older translations read "chaff"; the ESV renders the same line, "What has straw in common with wheat?")

Running without being sent

Being busy for God is not the same as being sent by Him.

They should have stood in the council of God and made His people hear His word (v. 22). Instead, they go out according to their own thoughts. How dangerous is that unfaithfulness! It twists, or even falsifies, the message of God's word by bringing in one's own opinions. "I did not send the prophets, yet they ran; I did not speak to them, yet they prophesied" (v. 21).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Borrowed words today

The same danger shows up whenever someone speaks for God out of borrowed material.

To talk about Him from what others say is to misrepresent Him, and to damage the soul of the speaker. To trade with what others write is dishonesty. To take the place of an "ambassador" without being long in His company is to be false to the One you claim to represent.

Modernised from C J DavisOriginal wording

Summary

- Stolen, not invented. The sin is not new heresy but recycled language. They copied the true prophets and produced only their own ideas.

- Stolen because popular. Borrowed words fit man's taste, and the human heart loves to hear God approve what it already wants.

- Stolen means unsent. These men ran without being sent; energy and confidence are no proof of a commission.

- Stolen words cannot do God's work. His word is fire and hammer, wheat and not chaff. It is its own witness, and imitation has no such power.

- Stolen goods bring the owner. Three times over, the Lord says He is against them — the theft is personal, and He answers it Himself.

Jeremiah 23:31 · Darby

Behold, I am against the prophets, saith Jehovah, that use their tongues, and say, He hath said.

In Jeremiah 23 God confronts the men who claimed to speak for Him. Here He names those who wag their own tongues and then stamp His name on what they say. The verse raises a practical question: what makes a message God's word and not a man's?

God's Name on Man's Words

The offence is not always making things up. It is dressing your own opinion in God's language, because that language is popular.

It was more popular to prophesy smooth things and lies. Nothing is so dear to the human heart as having God's approval for its own desires. That is why people loved the prophets who would say, "Thus says the Lord," when the Lord had not spoken. We should not think these prophets were always inventing lies. Instead, they corrupted the word of God and made it suit man's taste (2 Cor. 2:17). They had to copy many of the real prophets' expressions. Yet in the end they only produced their own empty speculations.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Running Unsent

A tongue that speaks without being sent is still busy. Activity is not the same as commission, and the same chapter says these men ran when God had not sent them.

God had to say of men who claimed to serve Him, "I did not send the prophets, yet they ran" (Jer. 23:21). Plenty of activity — yet the Lord had not sent them there. His will should have satisfied them. So they claimed to be His servants, but they did their own will. They dreamed their own dreams and chose their own messages. In truth they "forsook God who made" them.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

God Himself Opposed

God Himself takes up the case. He tells His people not to listen to men who speak from their own heart instead of from His mouth.

The Lord of hosts commanded His people not to listen to the prophets who made them empty — men speaking a vision of their own heart, not from the mouth of the Lord. No one authorised these men. If they had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. The Lord, who fills heaven and earth, was not unaware but took note of those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

There is a test hidden in that sentence. A real word from God changes how people live. A message that leaves its hearers where it found them shows where it came from.

Chaff or Wheat

How can an ordinary listener tell the difference? The answer in the same chapter is a comparison: chaff against wheat.

The false prophets, the profane priests, and all the other dreamers brought forward their words to deceive. But the Lord stands by His own words. How? Why should they pay attention to it? On what ground? On its own inherent power. "What is the chaff to the wheat?" (verse 28). Nutritional value decides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That test is within everyone's reach. Kelly says that knowing God's word is not a job for scholars.

I have never read a tradition that was not obviously chaff. I have never read a thought that came from man that was not worthless in the things of God. Give me something of God, and the moment my faith takes hold of the mind of God I have the wheat. In other words, the truth of God is not merely a question of historical investigation. What would become of the poor and the simple if they had to run long investigations to find out what the word of God was?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Same Thing Today

The pattern did not end with Jeremiah's generation. Ezekiel met it too, and the same charge fits any preaching that is the speaker's own mind with God's name attached.

Every man who prophesies out of his own heart is a false prophet, a blind leader of the blind. He speaks his own mind, and his preaching and teaching does not follow the word of God. What the Lord said through Ezekiel is true of all of them: "They have seen false visions and lying divinations. They say, 'Declares the LORD,' when the LORD has not sent them." They are self-called and self-sent.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

And the defence is not suspicion but Scripture itself.

Suppose someone comes with a fresh revelation, some new truth that is not in the Bible. We must judge him and his message by the standard of Scripture and reject them completely. False prophets come with great pretensions, high-sounding words and a pious manner. But they cannot stand the searching power of the word of God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Source — The sin is not always inventing lies. It is dressing man's thoughts in God's language to suit what people want to hear.

- Sending — These men ran hard, but God never sent them. They did their own will, dreamed their own dreams, and chose their own messages.

- Standing — God makes this complaint Himself. He fills heaven and earth, and He takes note of every word spoken in His name.

- Sifting — The test is chaff against wheat. God's word feeds people and turns them from their evil way. Man's word, however polished, feeds nobody.

- Simplicity — The test is open to the poor and the simple. They need no long investigation, only Scripture, which strips false prophets of their high-sounding words.

Jeremiah 23:32 · Darby

Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith Jehovah, and that tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies and by their boasting; and I have not sent them, nor commanded them; and they profit not this people at all, saith Jehovah.

God's charge against these prophets is not that they spoke badly, but that He never sent them. So how did their lies pass for God's word, and what did that cost the people who listened?

No commission behind the message

These prophets spoke in the Lord's name. One writer shows what they lacked, and what God did about it.

They had no authority at all. If they had made His people hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. The Lord, who fills heaven and earth, was not ignoring it; He took note of those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully. … The Lord would forsake them. He would cast prophet, priest, and people out of His presence. He would bring on them a lasting reproach and a shame that would never be forgotten.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Dreams of their own choosing

The verse traces the trouble back to the prophets themselves. Busyness was not the problem.

"I did not send the prophets, yet they ran" had to be said of those who claimed to serve Him. Plenty of activity, yet they were not sent there by the Lord, whose will should have satisfied them. So they claimed to be His servants. Yet they did their own will, dreamed their own dreams, chose their own messages, and in truth forsook the God who made them.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

Why anyone believed them

One writer gives two reasons: the message was pleasant, and it sounded like the real thing.

It was more popular to prophesy smooth things and deceptions. Nothing is so dear to the human heart as having God's approval on its own desires. That is why prophets who would say, "Thus says the Lord," when the Lord had not spoken, were so popular. We should not suppose that these prophets were always inventing lies. They corrupted the word of God and made it fit man's taste. They had to copy the real prophets in many of their expressions, and yet in the end produced only their own empty speculations.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

No profit for the hearers

The verse judges these prophets by what their hearers gained. One writer turns that test on anyone who stands up to speak.

If people gave these things proper attention, we would not have so many running unsent. So many rush into areas of ministry they were never designed for. Let everyone who stands up to preach, teach, encourage, or serve in any way ask a serious question. Is he truly fitted, taught and sent by God? If not, God will not own his work, and it will not be a blessing to people. The sooner he stops, the better — for himself, and for those on whom he has been laying the heavy burden of listening to him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The safeguard, for speaker and hearer

For the speaker, the safeguard starts with care about what he says in God's name.

Preach the truth. Take care about giving your own dreams and fancies in God's name. Everything is chaff except the pure word of God. Do not stamp God's image on your own coin! … Do not make experiments on people's souls by delivering what is doubtful. It is better to feed people with sound doctrine, even if it is a plain meal. That is better than serving some exotic dish and hitting on a wild gourd that brings death into their pot.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The hearer is not left helpless either. But the safeguard is not an official title.

There was no protection from these teachers in turning to another approved and recognised class of teachers. The teachers who mark the falling away would themselves be approved and recognised in the eyes of men. The only way to meet the difficulty and escape the trap would be personal faithfulness. In Israel, only the person who followed the Lord fully had the moral ability to tell the difference. He alone could tell the wheat from the chaff — the prophet of the Lord from the prophet of his own heart.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Not sent. The fault named in the verse is a missing commission. They were busy, but the Lord had not sent them. So they did their own will and chose their own messages.

- Not His word. They did not invent every word. They copied the phrasing of true prophets and reshaped God's word to suit people's taste. They said, "Thus says the Lord," when the Lord had not spoken.

- Not authorised. They had no authority at all. If they had made the people hear God's own words, those words would have turned them from their evil way.

- No profit. God does not own work He never taught and sent. It blesses no one. It only lays on hearers the heavy burden of listening.

- The test. Everything is chaff except the pure word of God. No official standing protects the hearer — personal faithfulness does. The one who follows the Lord fully can tell the Lord's prophet from the prophet of his own heart.

Jeremiah 23:33 · Darby

And when this people, or a prophet, or a priest, ask thee, saying, What is the burden of Jehovah? thou shalt then say unto them, What burden? I will even cast you off, saith Jehovah.

Through this chapter Jeremiah exposes prophets who spoke in God's name without being sent. Now God takes their favourite phrase away from them. When anyone asks Jeremiah for "the burden of the LORD," he must turn the word back on the asker: you are the burden, and God will cast you off.

The word "burden"

"Burden" was a standard word for a prophetic message. Commentators differ on exactly what it means. A Bible dictionary sets out both views and notes what God forbids here:

Besides the common use of this word, it occurs at the start of several prophecies, such as "The burden of Babylon," "the burden of Moab" (Isaiah 13:1; 15:1, and so on). Scholars do not agree on the force of the Hebrew word massa here. Its natural meaning would be "a judgment that lies heavy on the people," but some take it to mean "an oracle or sentence pronounced against them." The word also occurs in Jeremiah 23:33-38, where it is "the burden of the LORD." The false prophets were not to use this expression, as if they had a message from God. If they did, it would bring judgment on them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why that word? One writer points to the effect God intends by it:

The word burden carries the thought of a weight that is hard to bear, for God is bringing His displeasure to bear on mankind, and He intends people to feel it.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

The answer is the judgment

They asked for a burden. In the answer they become the burden, and God casts it off:

Verses 33-40. If they ask the question, "What is the burden of the LORD?" the answer is to be, "I will cast you off." The burden, or word of the Lord, is not to be mentioned again to them. They will be utterly forgotten and forsaken, with everlasting reproach and perpetual shame on them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Prophet, priest and people together

The verse names three groups: the people, a prophet and a priest. God clears none of them:

From verse 33 to the end of the chapter we see that the people, the prophet and the priest are all alike walking in vanity and not in the truth. They use the Name of the Lord in vain. So the Lord says, "I will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you." He would cast them out of His sight and make them a lasting shame (vv. 39-40).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why the phrase lost its meaning

These prophets had real influence with the people, and popularity decided what they said:

The weight of that influence was quickly turned against God. It was more popular to prophesy smooth things and deceits, and nothing is so dear to the human heart as to have God's approval for its own desires. That is why the prophets were popular who would say, "Thus says the LORD," when the LORD had not spoken. We should not suppose that these prophets were always inventing lies, but they corrupted the word of God and made it suit man's taste (2 Corinthians 2:17). They had to imitate many of the expressions of the real prophets, and yet in the end they only produced their own empty speculations.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Every man carries his own words

God takes the phrase away, so no one can hide his own words behind His name:

The fitting burden now was that the LORD would forsake them. No one was to mention the burden of the LORD any more, for every man's word would be his own burden. He would cast out prophet, priest and people from His presence, and bring on them a lasting reproach and a perpetual shame that would not be forgotten.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What a real burden looks like

God banned the phrase because it had gone empty, not because He had stopped speaking. A real burden still shows itself:

To someone with a "burden of the LORD" resting on his soul, no time would be unsuitable. Like Jeremiah, he would find that the Word was in his heart like a burning fire, and he would grow weary with holding back, and would not be able to stop (Jeremiah 23:38; 20:9).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Burden. The word means a message that lies heavy — God's displeasure brought to bear, and meant to be felt.

- Question. The phrase had become a formula. People kept it alive because messages shaped to their taste sold well.

- Answer. God turns the word back on them: they are the burden, and He will cast them off.

- Reach. Prophet, priest and people fall under it together — all three were using His name in vain.

- Result. God withdraws the phrase, and every man's own word becomes his own burden. A true burden burns in a man until he speaks it.

Jeremiah 23:34 · Darby

And as for the prophet, and the priest, and the people, that shall say, The burden of Jehovah, I will even punish that man and his house.

Here God turns against a catchphrase. "The burden of the LORD" was on everyone's lips, and He promises to punish anyone who keeps saying it, together with his household.

The word "burden"

The phrase was not slang. It was the standard heading over a prophetic message, and scholars still argue about what it means:

Apart from its ordinary use, this word stands at the start of several prophecies, such as "The burden of Babylon" and "the burden of Moab" (Isaiah 13:1; Isaiah 15:1, and others). Scholars do not agree on the force of massa in these places. Its natural meaning would be "a judgement that lies heavy on the people." But some take it to mean "an oracle or sentence pronounced against them." The word also occurs in Jeremiah 23:33-38, where it is "the burden of the Lord." The false prophets were not to use this expression, as if they had a message from God. If they did, it would bring judgement on them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Prophet, priest and people

The verse names three groups, and the prophets come first. In the nation's turning away from God, they had drifted as far as the priests had:

So we find God's special witnesses speaking against the prophets in the middle of the apostasy just as much as against the priests. The two go together. But the prophets seem to have taken a bigger part in pushing the apostasy forward, and so the real prophets of the Lord speak to them more often. This testimony of the Lord against the prophets grew as the apostasy set in. The nearer the ruin came (such is the way of His grace), the more testimony He raised about it. But as God multiplied His witnesses, the prophets of the people multiplied too.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The people are not spared either, because the whole nation had gone the same way:

It was very sad that God should have to speak to His people like this. "The prophet, and the priest, and the people" were all marked by departure from Him. So the Lord has to say to them, "For you have perverted the words of the living God, of the Lord of hosts our God" (Jeremiah 23:34-36).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Why a familiar phrase drew punishment

God is not objecting to a word. He is objecting to men borrowing His vocabulary to give their own thoughts authority:

But the weight of the prophets' influence soon turned against God. It was more popular to prophesy smooth things and lies. Nothing is so dear to the human heart as having God's approval on its own desires. So the popular prophets were the ones who would say, "Thus says the Lord," when the Lord had not spoken. We should not suppose that these prophets were always inventing lies. But they corrupted the word of God and made it fit man's taste (2 Corinthians 2:17). They had to copy many of the real prophets' expressions. Yet in the end they only produced their own empty speculations.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The sentence itself

The punishment fits the crime. They wanted a burden from the Lord, and now they get one:

The burden now due to them was this: Jehovah would forsake them. They were not to mention the burden of Jehovah any more, for every man's word should be his burden. He would cast out prophet, priest and people from His presence. He would bring on them an everlasting reproach and a lasting shame that no one would forget.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same danger did not end with Judah:

They prophesied lies in the name of Jehovah; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of Jehovah. This is still the work of teachers today who have turned away from the truth. They speak out of the deceit of their hearts. They prophesy lies, and they take aim at the Name which is above every Name.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Judgment set beside mercy

Judgment is not the last word in this chapter:

So in Jeremiah 23 we have their general and solemn judgment, but not without the vision of sovereign mercy when the Son of David shall arise. How refreshing to read such words in the middle of the moral horrors we have had before us!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- The word. "Burden" (massa) headed real prophecies. Commentators differ over whether it means a heavy judgment or a sentence passed. Either way, it was God's word, not a slogan.

- The theft. Men copied the words of true prophets and filled them with their own speculations. A message shaped to suit people's desires is always more popular.

- The reach. Prophet, priest and people all fall under the same charge. The prophets are named first, and the punishment reaches a man's household.

- The reversal. They asked for the burden of the Lord, and they got one. God forsook them, and every man's own word became his burden.

- The hope. The same chapter that condemns the false shepherds promises the true Son of David. Mercy stands beside the judgment.

Jeremiah 23:35 · Darby

Thus shall ye say every one to his neighbour, and every one to his brother What hath Jehovah answered? and, What hath Jehovah spoken?

The chapter has been exposing prophets who stamped God's name on their own words. Now God tells the people how to speak instead. They must drop the phrase they had been throwing around. They are to ask each other what He has said.

The Phrase God Banned

People, priests and prophets all used one expression — "the burden of the LORD" — as a label for whatever anyone cared to announce. God takes that word out of their mouths and gives them a real burden instead.

The real burden now was that the LORD would forsake them. They were not to speak of "the burden of the LORD" any more, because every man's own word would be his burden. He would cast prophet, priest, and people out of His presence. He would bring on them everlasting disgrace, and a lasting shame that would never be forgotten.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer gives God's answer to the banned question.

If they ask, "What is the burden of the LORD?" the answer is to be, "I will cast you off." The burden, or word of the Lord, will not be mentioned to them again.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Three Groups, One Fault

Verse 35 speaks to neighbours and brothers — ordinary people, not just the prophets. The end of the chapter puts all three groups together.

From verse 33 to the end of the chapter, the people, the prophet and the priest are all walking in vanity and not in the truth. They use the Name of the Lord in vain. So the Lord says, "I will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you."

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What made this so serious was not sloppy speech but the handling of words that belonged to God Himself.

It was very sad that God had to speak to His people this way. "The prophet, and the priest, and the people" were all marked by departure from Him. So the Lord has to say to them, "You have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God" (Jer. 23:34-36). Israel had been the special objects of God's care, and He had done His wonderful works among them. Even so, they turned from the living and true God to serve the idols of the nations.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Asking Instead of Announcing

The new wording turns a speaker into an enquirer. It also drops the label, because God's word needs no label to prove itself. Kelly shows how even an untaught person can tell the real thing.

Give a hungry man a piece of bread, and he knows well that it is bread. He may never have seen that sort of bread before, and may never have tasted it, but he is sure it is bread. Give him a piece of board, and he knows this is not bread. By human learning a man may know very little. Yet God guards even the simplest of His people with a practical test. "What is chaff to the wheat?" The truth of God always commends itself to the consciences of those who hear it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Saying "The LORD Says" Today

The question God allows keeps the focus on whether He has spoken at all. That claim leaves no middle ground.

Take that enormous claim of the Bible, "Thus says the LORD," repeated over and over again. Now, did the Lord say it, or did He not? If He did say it, then to treat anything He said as merely human writing is sheer blasphemy. If He did not say it, then to talk of anyone drawing comfort or inspiration from such deceitful words is to recommend a very silly, sentimental — not to say immoral — religion.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Kelly asks the same restraint of anyone who speaks for God now. He builds it on one line of Scripture.

"If anyone speaks, let him speak as the oracles of God." According to this, no one should ever speak unless he is fully sure that he is giving out God's mind and message, suited to that time and those souls. If people felt this as they should, would it not stop a great many from speaking? And there is no reason to fear that silence in such a case would be a real loss to the church of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — God takes one phrase out of Judah's mouth and hands them another. He corrects the way they speak about Him.

- Burden — the catchphrase they liked became their sentence. Every man's own word turned into his burden.

- Whom — prophet, priest and people are named together. No one could hide behind his role. All had perverted the words of the living God.

- Ask — the question God allows makes a person an enquirer, not an announcer. His word then proves itself, as wheat is known from chaff.

- Speak — stay silent unless you have His message. "Thus says the LORD" is either true or blasphemous, never casual.

Jeremiah 23:36 · Darby

And the burden of Jehovah shall ye mention no more; for every man's own word shall be his burden for ye have perverted the words of the living God, of Jehovah of hosts, our God.

God tells Jeremiah to ban a phrase. "The burden of the LORD" had become a slogan anyone could repeat, so God turns the word back on the speakers: their own words are now the weight they carry.

What "burden" meant

The word behind "burden" is the Hebrew massa. A reference work sets out its range of meaning and the ban given here.

Apart from its ordinary use, this word appears at the start of several prophecies, such as "the burden of Babylon" and "the burden of Moab." Scholars do not agree on the force of massa in such places. Its natural meaning would be "a judgement that lies heavy on the people." Some take it to mean "an oracle or sentence pronounced against them." The word also occurs in Jeremiah 23:33-38, where it is "the burden of the Lord." The false prophets were not to use this expression, as if they had a message from God. If they did, it would bring judgement on them. The same word is translated "prophecy" in Proverbs 30:1 and 31:1.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

How the phrase lost its meaning

Why did the phrase spread? One writer points to what listeners wanted to hear.

It was more popular to prophesy smooth things and deceits. Nothing is so dear to the human heart as having God's approval for its own sinful desires. So prophets who would say, "Thus says the Lord," when the Lord had not spoken, became popular. We should not suppose that these prophets were always inventing lies. But they corrupted the word of God and made it suit man's taste (2 Cor. 2:17). They had to copy many of the real prophets' expressions, yet in the end they only produced their own empty ideas.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Every man's own word

The verse says every man's own word is his burden. Earlier in the chapter God had named the same fault.

Instead of passing the Word of the Lord to their hearers, "They speak a vision of their own heart." They do not stand in the council of God and cause His people to hear His Word (v. 22). They go out according to their own thoughts instead. How dangerous is that unfaithfulness! It brings in one's own opinions, and so warps or even falsifies the message of God's Word. "I did not send these prophets, yet they ran; I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied" (v. 21).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Perverting the words of the living God

The verse ends with the charge: they pervert the words of the living God. One writer names who shared the guilt, and what came of it.

How very sad it was that God should have to speak to His people in this way. "The prophet, and the priest, and the people" were all marked by turning away from Him. So the Lord has to say to them, "You pervert the words of the living God, the LORD of hosts, our God" (Jer. 23:34-36). They had been the special objects of God's care, and He had done His wonderful works among them. Yet Israel had turned from the living and true God to serve the idols of the nations. Is it any wonder that God, in His righteous rule, allowed the nations to take them captive?

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The real weight

God bans the phrase and names the weight that now falls to them instead.

The due burden now was that the LORD would forsake them. They were not to mention the burden of the LORD any more, for every man's word should be his burden. He would cast out prophet, priest, and people from His presence. He would bring on them an everlasting reproach, and a lasting shame that would not be forgotten.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A real burden

The verse bans the phrase, not the thing itself. One writer describes what a real burden does to the man who carries one.

To one who had a "burden of the LORD" resting on his soul, no time would be the wrong time. Like Jeremiah, he would find that the Word was in his heart as a burning fire. He would be weary with holding it in, and he would not be able to stay (Jer. 23:38; 20:9).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Burden defined. The word headed many prophecies. It meant a weight: a judgement pressing on people, or a sentence spoken against them.

- Burden borrowed. They kept the phrase and dropped the message. They bent God's word to fit what listeners wanted.

- Burden self-made. Their own thoughts replaced God's word. So the weight they carried was one they made themselves.

- Burden returned. They twisted the words of the living God. His righteous rule fell on prophet, priest and people alike — captivity, and shame that lasted.

- Burden genuine. A real message from God burns in the heart like fire. The one who carries it cannot stay silent — unlike the man who only repeats a phrase.

Jeremiah 23:37 · Darby

Thus shalt thou say to the prophet What hath Jehovah answered thee? and, What hath Jehovah spoken?

Jeremiah 23 closes with a dispute over words. The people, their priests and their prophets had made a catchword of "the burden of the LORD," so God hands Jeremiah two plain questions to use instead.

The word "burden"

The Hebrew word behind "burden" opens several prophecies. Scholars debate its exact force. A dictionary of Bible terms sets out both senses, and then explains why God took the phrase away from these men:

Besides the common use of this word, it occurs at the start of several prophecies. Examples are "The burden of Babylon" and "the burden of Moab" (Isaiah 13:1; Isaiah 15:1). Scholars do not agree about the force of massa in such places. Its natural meaning would be "a judgment that lies heavy on the people." But some take its meaning to be "an oracle or sentence pronounced against them." The word also occurs in Jeremiah 23:33-38, where it is "the burden of the Lord." The false prophets were not to use this expression, as if they had a message from God. If they did, it should bring judgment upon them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

God took the phrase away because it claimed His authority for a message He had never given. The two questions in its place simply ask what He has said.

The burden that fell on them

They kept demanding "the burden of the LORD." God answers that the real weight now falling on them is His own departure. One commentator traces how their own speech turns back on them:

The burden they now deserved was this: Jehovah would forsake them. They were to speak of "the burden of Jehovah" no more, for every man's word should be his own burden. He would cast out prophet, priest and people from His presence. He would bring on them an everlasting reproach, and a lasting shame that would not be forgotten.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Prophet, priest and people together

The failure was not confined to a few bad teachers. The whole nation had a hand in it. God names the offence plainly: they had twisted the words of the living God.

How very sad it was that God should have to speak like this to His people. "The prophet, and the priest, and the people" were all marked by departure from Him. So the Lord has to say to them, "For you have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God" (Jeremiah 23:34-36). Israel had been the special object of God's care, and He had done His wonderful works among them. Despite that, Israel had turned from the living and true God to serve the idols of the nations.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

How a real word from God proves itself

If the old label is withdrawn, how is anyone to tell a true message from a false one? The chapter has already answered that, a few verses earlier, and the test costs nothing to apply:

The later part of this chapter again presses the value of the word of Jehovah very strongly, and in an interesting way. The false prophets, the profane priests, and all the other dreamers brought forward their words to deceive, but the Lord stands by His own utterances. And how? Why should they take heed to it? On what ground? On its own intrinsic power. "What is the chaff to the wheat?" Nutritive value decides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Running unsent

These men were busy and confident. God's complaint was simple: He had not sent them.

God had to say of men who professed to serve Him, "I have not sent these prophets ... yet they ran" (Jeremiah 23:21). Much activity, yet the Lord had not sent them there, and His will should have satisfied them. So while they claimed to be His servants, they did their own will. They dreamed their own dreams and chose their own messages.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. "Burden" (massa) means a heavy judgment, or a sentence spoken against a people. Either way it was God's, and He took it from men who had no message from Him.

- Swap. In its place He gives two honest questions: what has the Lord answered, and what has the Lord spoken?

- Weight. Every man's word became his own burden. The heaviest burden of all was that the Lord would forsake them.

- Spread. Prophet, priest and people all shared the charge of perverting the words of the living God.

- Test. God's word feeds, and so proves itself, as wheat proves itself against chaff. Men who run unsent can only serve their own dreams.

after_note_none:

Jeremiah 23:38 · Darby

But since ye say, The burden of Jehovah, therefore thus saith Jehovah Because ye say this word, The burden of Jehovah, and I have sent unto you, saying, Ye shall not say, The burden of Jehovah;

God had banned one phrase from His people's lips. Verse 38 quotes them saying it anyway, right back in His face. What happens when people keep using religious language after God tells them to stop?

A phrase God refused

"The burden of the LORD" was a real title for a prophet's message. By Jeremiah's day the people were tossing it back as a question, after God had forbidden them to say it. His reply refuses the word and turns the question on them:

If they ask the question, "What is the burden of the LORD?" the answer is to be, "I will cast you off." The burden, or word of the Lord, is not to be mentioned again to them. They will be utterly forgotten and forsaken, with everlasting reproach and perpetual shame upon them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The punishment fits the crime. They asked for a burden; their own words became one.

That Jehovah would forsake them was the due burden now, and the burden of Jehovah was not to be mentioned any more; for every man's word should be his burden.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Nobody was exempt

This was not a scandal confined to a few bad preachers. The verses around it name the prophet, the priest, and the ordinary person together. All three had twisted what God said:

How very sad it was that God should have to speak this way to His people. "The prophet, and the priest, and the people" were all marked by departure from Him. So the Lord has to say to them, "For you have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God." Israel had been the special object of God's care, and He had done His wonderful works among them. Yet they had turned from the living and true God to serve the idols of the nations.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Running without being sent

Behind the misuse of the phrase lay a deeper fault. Men spoke for God when God had given them nothing to say. One writer weighs the difference between being sent and going anyway:

If He sends us, all is well; then we may gladly go without a fear or a question; but woe to the one who runs unsent. The Lord had to say of other prophets: "I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran; I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied" (Jer. 23:21). Let us beware of such work done in the name of the Lord! We all need to take the warning home to ourselves.

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Activity was not the problem. Running unsent was.

Much activity, yet not sent there by the Lord, whose will should have contented them. So while professing to be His servants, they did their own will, dreamed their own dreams, chose their own messages, and in truth "forsook God who made" them.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

Man's own institution

The slide did not happen overnight. One writer points to the moment when men took charge of supplying God's word:

Man had taken God's ordinance into his own keeping — he had an institution of his own for supplying what God alone could supply effectively. So we find the prophets testified against by God's special witnesses in the middle of the apostasy just as much as the priests were... The Lord's testimony against the prophets grew as the apostasy set in. The nearer the ruin came, the more testimony He raised about it — such is the way of His grace.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The burden worth carrying

The phrase itself was never the problem. A real burden will not let a servant rest. One writer sets Jeremiah beside Timothy, whose work was to go on at all times:

All times were to be alike to Timothy; he must never break off his work; he must always watch for a chance to fulfil his calling. To anyone with a "burden of the LORD" resting on his soul, no time would be unsuitable. Like Jeremiah, he would find the Word in his heart as a burning fire. He would be weary with holding it in, and could not stop (Jer. 23:38; 20:9).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The same words can be a fire in one man and an empty phrase in another.

Summary

- Phrase — "The burden of the LORD" was a real title for God's message. Jeremiah's generation kept flinging it back after God had banned the words.

- Perversion — The charge is not ignorance. Prophet, priest and people alike had perverted the words of the living God.

- Presumption — Underneath it were men who ran unsent. They dreamed their own dreams and chose their own messages in God's name.

- Penalty — The sentence matches the sin. They asked for a burden, so their own word becomes their burden. God casts them out with lasting shame.

- Proof — A real burden is the one Jeremiah knew: a word burning inside that a servant cannot hold in, in season or out.

Jeremiah 23:39 · Darby

therefore behold, I will utterly forget you, and I will cast you off, far from my face, and the city that I gave to you and to your fathers.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jeremiah 23:40 · Darby

And I will bring everlasting reproach upon you, and everlasting shame, that shall not be forgotten.

Jeremiah 23 closes with God's verdict on men who used the phrase "the burden of the LORD" for messages He never gave them. God turns their own word back on them: they will carry not a burden from Him, but a shame that never wears off.

The word "burden"

The word behind "burden" had a settled place in prophecy before these men borrowed it.

Besides the common use of this word, it occurs at the beginning of several prophecies, as "the burden of Babylon," "the burden of Moab" (Isaiah 13:1; 15:1, etc.). Scholars do not agree on the force of massa in such places. Its natural meaning would be "a judgment that lies heavy on the people," but some take it to mean "an oracle or sentence pronounced against them." The word also occurs in Jeremiah 23:33-38, where it is "the burden of the LORD." The false prophets were not to use this expression, as if they had a message from God. If they did, it would bring judgment on them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The sentence handed down

God now names the burden these men will really carry.

The fitting burden now was that the LORD would forsake them. They were not to mention the burden of the LORD any more, for every man's word would be his burden. He would cast out prophet, priest, and people from His presence. He would bring on them an everlasting reproach, and a perpetual shame which would not be forgotten.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three classes, one failure

The sentence is not for the prophets alone. It covers prophet, priest and ordinary people, and it names the one fault they share.

From verse 33 to the end of the chapter we see that the people, the prophet and the priest are all alike walking in vanity and not in the truth. They use the Name of the Lord in vain; therefore the Lord says, "I will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you." They should be cast out of His sight, and be a perpetual shame (vv. 39-40).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Vine quotes verse 39 from an older translation, which reads "I will utterly forget you." God forgets them; the shame He brings is not forgotten.

Running unsent

Behind the sentence lies a simple fault: activity God never asked for.

"I have not sent these prophets," had to be said of those who professed to serve Him, "yet they ran." Much activity, yet not sent there by the Lord, whose will should have contented them. So while professing to be His servants, they did their own will, dreamed their own dreams, chose their own messages, and in truth "forsook God who made" them.

Modernised from W. H. WestcottOriginal wording

The same trade, still running

Their target was the Name of the LORD, and one commentator sees the same work going on today.

They prophesied lies in the name of the LORD; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of the LORD. Such is still today the work of apostate teachers, who speak out of the deceit of their hearts, who prophesy lies and who aim at the Name which is above every name.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The mark of a true message

The chapter also shows what a true message from God would have done to those who heard it.

They had no authority at all. If they had caused His people to hear His words, they would have turned them from their evil way. The LORD, who fills heaven and earth, was watching, and He marked those who prophesied lies in His name. If they had His word, let them speak it faithfully.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Not God's last word for the nation

The chapter ends in judgment, but the book does not stop there.

Jeremiah 24, the last of our section, shows by the sign of the two baskets of figs that a remnant shall be preserved, though the rest as bad figs are utterly rejected... Even in the land of the Chaldeans the eyes of the Lord are on them for good. They should be restored again, too, and established in the land of Israel; but better than the best of the land, they should know the Lord; and better than returning to the place, they should return to Him.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Burden — massa means a heavy judgment, or a sentence pronounced. The false prophets used the word as if they had a message from God.

- Boomerang — every man's own word becomes his burden. The claim they made turns into the charge against them.

- Everyone — prophet, priest and people fall together. All of them use God's Name in vain instead of standing in the truth.

- Unsent — the root fault is running when God has not sent you. You do your own will, dream your own dreams, choose your own message.

- Remnant — the shame stands, yet the next chapter shows God keeping a remnant. They come back to the land, and better still, they come back to Him.