Jeremiah 2:1–8:17

Jeremiah 2:1 · Darby

And the word of Jehovah came to me, saying,

Jeremiah 1 records the prophet's own calling. Chapter 2 opens with a fresh word — the first message God gives him to carry to the people themselves. What follows is not the anger we might expect, but a memory of love.

Where This Word Falls

The three chapters that open the book each do a different job.

In Jeremiah 1 we have his commission and his character shown. We also have the visions given to encourage him in going on with the work the Lord had entrusted to him. In the same way, Jeremiah 2 shows us the state of Israel, and more particularly of Jerusalem. There the Lord rehearses what He had been to His people, and what their conduct had been, despite His favours. In Jeremiah 3 He says what He is going to do for them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"The Word of the LORD"

God had set ways of reaching His prophets. This verse names one of them.

Prophetic utterances and prophetic signs were generally communicated by "vision" (Isa. 6) or "word of the Lord" (Jer. 2:1).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

God Speaks Into Their Ears

This word came with an order: go and cry in the ears of Jerusalem. God does not wait for interested listeners to come to Him.

God said to Jeremiah, "Go, say in the ears of Jerusalem"; but Israel would not hear. Now this was disastrous; but God remembers His relationship to them... However bad their state was, He recalls the memory of their relationship with all its force and energy — "Go, cry in the ears of Jerusalem." It is not, "He who has an ear, let him hear." God goes and speaks in their ears. Oh that He may speak in our ears!

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Whose Love Is Remembered

The next verse recalls "the love of your espousals" — wording from an older translation. Whose love is God remembering?

Now the Lord remembers the relationship we know ourselves to be in, as in Jeremiah 2: "Go, speak in the ears of Jerusalem, I remember you, the love of your espousals." This is not God's love to Israel, unfailing as this proved to be, but Israel's love to God. It was love shown when they thought God worth following for Himself, when they had nothing else besides.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the Wilderness Is the Proof

God could have recalled the cities, wells and palm trees Israel received in Canaan. He names the desert instead.

They got much of this world's goods in Canaan by following God. They got cities they had not built, wells they had not dug, palm trees they had not planted, and the like. All these things were the consequences of following God; but He does not mention these. Instead He says, "you went after Me in the wilderness, which was a land of deserts and pits, a land of drought and the shadow of death, a land that no one passed through, and where no one lived." You went after Me in the wilderness, where there was nothing to set your affections on but Myself. He overlooks all failure. The condition God notices is that He Himself was everything to them. This is what marks a heart when first converted to God — the Lord is everything to it.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

The Charge That Follows

The rest of the chapter turns to complaint. One loss lies behind every charge.

Jeremiah 2 is the first recorded word to the people. It gives the first thought which filled the heart of the Lord, the main reason for all the sorrow — those who once loved Him had forsaken Him. He could not forget the kindness of their early years when they first went after Him. He remembered the love of their espousals. But now He complains again and again: they have "gone far from Me"; they have "forsaken Me"; they have "turned their back to Me"; they have "forgotten Me" (see vv. 2, 5, 13, 17, 19, 27, 32).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Same Memory Later

One writer sets this memory beside the Lord's complaint against the church at Ephesus in Revelation 2.

The Lord never forgets His joy in the first love of His people... Jehovah never forgets Judah's first love. The Lord remembers and desires the Church's first love just as much... Now the threatened judgment can only be turned aside by a recovery to "first love" and "first works." So the two commands needed to this end are "Remember" and "Repent."

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Summary

- Word. God sent His message to Jeremiah as "the word of the LORD" — one of the set ways He spoke to His prophets.

- Cry. God did not tell him to wait for listeners. He was to speak straight into Jerusalem's ears, because God still held to the relationship they had left.

- Remembered. What He recalls is their love for Him — the days when they judged Him worth following for His own sake.

- Wilderness. He names the desert, not Canaan's wells and cities, because there He alone was the object of their affection.

- Return. The Lord presses the same memory on the church at Ephesus. The way back is the same in both: remember, and repent.

Jeremiah 2:2 · Darby

Go and cry in the ears of Jerusalem, saying, Thus saith Jehovah I remember for thee the kindness of thy youth, the love of thine espousals, when thou wentest after me in the wilderness, in a land not sown.

Jeremiah's second chapter opens with a memory, not a charge. God sends the prophet to remind Jerusalem how they once loved Him, and that opening raises a question: why does God answer a failing people by looking back at love?

Whose love is remembered

The verse is often read as God recalling His own faithfulness. One writer insists the sense runs the other way — this is the record of what His people once felt for Him.

The Lord remembers the kind of relationship in which we know ourselves to be. In Jeremiah 2 He says, "Go, speak in the ears of Jerusalem, I remember you, the love of your betrothal." This is not God's love to Israel, unfailing as that proved to be. It is Israel's love to God — when they thought God worth following for Himself, when they had nothing else beside.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the wilderness, and not Canaan

God could have pointed to the rich land He later gave them. He names the empty place instead.

What a thing it was for God to say to Israel, "I have not forgotten what you were to Me in the days of your youth, when the heart first turned to Me." … They got much of this world's goods in Canaan by following God. They got cities that they had not built, wells that they had not dug, palm trees that they had not planted, and the like. All these things were the consequences of following God; but He does not mention these. But "you went after Me in the wilderness, which was a land of deserts and pits, a land of drought, and the shadow of death, a land that no man passed through, and where no man dwelt." You went after Me in the wilderness, where there was nothing to set your affections on but Myself. I Myself was the whole and sole object of your affections. This is what God remembered.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The best remembered in the worst days

Those forty years were also full of complaint and rebellion, and God missed none of it. Yet this is the period He selects as their finest.

In the worst days He most graciously remembers the best. Here is a striking thing. What the Lord calls here "the love of your betrothal" — the first love — is the love Israel showed during their stay in the wilderness, the "land that was not sown." Did He not hear the murmurs? Did He not see His people's rebellion during those forty years? Surely He did. But He saw this also, and it is what had great value in His eyes: that they, despite everything, went after Him. How? By following the cloud which was the symbol of His presence. When it moved they moved, never going before it or stopping behind.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What "the love of espousals" means

"Espousals" is the language of an engaged bride. A writer connects the phrase to the same love the Lord looks for in the church, and explains that "first" here is a matter of quality rather than date.

"First love" is not first in time, but first in quality. It is the best — Luke 15 uses the same word for the "best robe." Nothing but the best will suit the Lord. Who will dare to offer Him less than the best? … Paul said to another church, "I betrothed you to one husband, to present you as a pure virgin to Christ." First love is the love of betrothal, and this love is most precious to the Lord.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

Outward correctness is not the thing measured

Judah under Josiah had a national reformation, and God still was not satisfied with it — because the reform did not reach the affections.

He looked beneath the surface. He looked for reality, for tenderness of conscience, for subjection of heart to His word; and He found them not. "The kindness of your youth, the love of your betrothal" were missing. God will never be satisfied with anything short of thoroughness.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same question asked of us

One writer turns the verse on the reader.

I love to see the affection of soul, and the energy, and fervency, that mark a young convert. You old, cold, critical Christian, do you think your heart is as fresh as it was in the first two weeks after you were saved? Oh, you say, I know a great deal more now. Is the simple love of Jesus, the delight in Jesus, the practical holiness, and the desire to be anything and everything for Jesus, the same as it was then? You may have forgotten that early thrill of affection, but God has not forgotten.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The wording of the parallel warning in Revelation matters, he adds:

It is not "lost your first love." I do not think that is a scriptural thought. It is, "left your first love." Something has come in that has eclipsed Me, and all your affection for Me and interest in Me has gone, and you can get on without Me now — but there was a time when you could not.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Remembered. God's first word to a failing people is not the charge sheet but the memory of when they loved Him.

- Remembered love. He treasures their love to Him — the days they thought Him worth following for His own sake, with nothing else.

- Remembered place. He names the wilderness, not the settled land. There He alone was the object of their affections. The gifts came later, and He does not mention them.

- Remembered best. He heard every murmur of those forty years. He still calls that time their finest, because they moved when the cloud moved.

- Remembered still. You may have forgotten your first weeks of love. God has not — and the question stands: is your heart as fresh now as it was then?

Jeremiah 2:3 · Darby

Israel was holiness unto Jehovah, the first-fruits of his increase all that devour him are guilty; evil shall come upon them, saith Jehovah.

God's first message through Jeremiah does not open with charges. It opens with memory. Before the long list of Israel's sins, He recalls what she once was to Him: set apart, and the first of His harvest. So how can God call a nation holy when its record was full of failure? And what happens to those who attack a people He has claimed?

(The quotes below use an older translation: "holiness to the Lord" where the ESV has "holy to the LORD.")

The Opening Word: Remembrance

Everything painful in Jeremiah flows from one wound. The first message names it before it names any sin.

Jeremiah 2 is the first recorded word to the people. It gives the first thought which filled the heart of the Lord, the main reason, as we have said, for all the sorrow. — Those who once loved Him had forsaken Him. He could not forget the kindness of their early years when they first went after Him. He remembered their love as a bride. But now He complains again and again: they have "gone far from Me"; they have "forsaken Me"; they have "turned their back to Me"; they have "forgotten Me."

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Holy to the Lord

The phrase was not invented for this verse. Aaron, Israel's first high priest, wore it on a gold plate on his head. How could a people who complained so much carry that title?

A blue cord fastened the "plate of the holy crown" to the turban on Aaron's head, and on it were the words "Holiness to the Lord" (Ex. 39:30-31). From Jeremiah 2 we learn that this was how the Lord viewed His people when He brought them out of Egypt. When we consider all the murmurings of Israel, and their rebellion time after time against God, we might wonder how God could see anything holy about them. Yet He was able to view them in this way, as He showed through Balaam (Num. 23:21). God could see what Israel would be for Him under the new covenant, secured through the precious blood of Jesus. In that day the inscription on the horses will be "Holiness to the Lord" (Zech. 14:20).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Firstfruits: More to Come

A firstfruit is never the whole crop. Calling Israel the first of the harvest points past Israel, and it explains the warning attached to the title.

He had separated Israel to belong to Him, to be a holy nation, the first fruits of His increase, which probably means that God would call other nations to know Him through Israel. He was their protector, and He would hold guilty those who tried to devour them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Title That Still Holds

A New Testament writer quotes this line and turns it into an argument about Israel's future.

By the word "firstfruit" I understand the apostle to mean the nation of Israel in its first calling and honour. As it is written: "Israel was holy to the LORD, the firstfruits of his harvest" (Jer. 2:3)... But the Lord's blessing had gone, and Israel had become an empty and dishonoured vine (Ps. 80). Yet the Shepherd of Israel and the Stone of their help still remained in His purpose... So the apostle argues that the final destiny of the nation will be worthy of its first calling... The nation is itself the creation of God's promise. Grace is the true source of Israel.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Why Devouring Israel Brings Disaster

Anyone who ate of this firstfruit incurred guilt. The reason is not arbitrary. It follows from whom God has joined Himself to.

From the moment God is in Israel He identifies Himself with His people. In consequence of this the nations are treated according as they treated Israel... The moment they touch Israel, they touch the apple of His eye.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Question It Puts to Us

Israel's freshness lasted a season. One writer presses the same test on any long-time believer.

Eight hundred and fifty years had passed since that people, obeying God, turned their back on Egypt and its meat pots and came out to the Lord. They were holiness to the Lord then. They were then a separate people for the Lord, the third verse tells us. I love to see the affection of soul, and the energy, and fervency, that mark a young convert. Why, you old, cold, critical Christian, do you think your heart is as fresh as it was the first two weeks after you were saved? Oh, you say, I know a great deal more now. Is the simple love of Jesus, the delight in Jesus, the practical holiness, and the desire to be anything, and everything, for Jesus, the same as it was then?

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Remembered — God's first word through Jeremiah is not an accusation. It is a memory of early love, and the sorrow of the whole book grows out of it.

- Holy — The high priest wore "Holiness to the Lord" on his crown. God gave the same name to a people full of complaints, because He saw what they would yet be to Him.

- First — Firstfruits means a harvest is still coming. God set Israel apart for Himself so that other nations might come to know Him through her.

- Guarded — God identifies Himself with His people. Those who devour them touch the apple of His eye, and disaster falls on them.

- Fresh? — The same test lands on us. God remembers the love, energy and practical holiness of the first days, and He looks for them still.

Jeremiah 2:4 · Darby

Hear the word of Jehovah, house of Jacob, and all the families of the house of Israel.

God's case against His people opens with a summons, not a charge: He tells Jeremiah to call the whole nation to listen. Who is included in that call, and why does God begin with an appeal instead of a verdict?

A summons to the whole nation

The call goes out to the house of Jacob and to every family in Israel. One writer reads that wide reach as proof that God had not yet set the nation aside, but still owned them as His:

The judgment of "Lo-ammi" was not carried out before the captivity of Judah, for in Jeremiah 2 God still calls them His people. And this was not because the term "Lo-ammi" could apply only to Israel. To show that, I quote verse 4: "Hear the word of the LORD, O house of Jacob, and all the clans of the house of Israel." On the other hand, the New Testament shows us that then also all Israel was in view, and that God considered it as not His people, alluding to Hosea.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

("Lo-ammi" means "not my people.")

God's word put into their ears

God does not call for volunteers. He sends His messenger to speak into ears that had stopped hearing:

God said to Jeremiah, "Go, say in the ears of Jerusalem"; but Israel would not hear. This was disastrous; yet God remembers His relationship to them... Bad as their state was, He recalls that relationship with all its force: "Go, cry in the ears of Jerusalem." He does not say, "He who has an ear, let him hear." God goes and speaks in their ears. Oh that He may speak in our ears!

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

An appeal, not yet a sentence

Verses 5 to 8 review God's own conduct toward them, and end with the failure of their leaders:

Nothing can be more moving than the Lord's appeal. He reminds them of the promise they made and their dedication to the LORD at the beginning of their history (vv. 1-3). Was the fault in the Lord that their fathers walked after vanity? Were they not willingly ignorant? They did not feel His goodness in bringing them out of the furnace of Egypt, through the dreary desert, and into His good land — the land they had defiled and made an abomination. (vv. 4-7.) Nor were the priests, the shepherds, or the prophets any better. They were worse, or at least more obvious in their sin against Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No fault on God's side

God turns the first question back on them: what wrong did their fathers find in Him? Nothing had changed on His side, and they had not noticed what they lost:

When Israel came out of Egypt they had a deep sense of the Lord's care and protection... What a moving plea for the Lord to bring before His people. Had He changed since that day? No, there was no change on His side. They had lost His presence, and they were unaware of the loss. "They did not say, 'Where is the LORD who brought us up from the land of Egypt?'" They had forgotten both the grace of the Lord and the kindness of the Lord.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The first complaint: forsaken love

This summons opens Jeremiah's first message to the people. One writer points to the complaint repeated through it:

Jeremiah 2 is the first recorded word to the people. It gives the first thought that filled the heart of the Lord, the main reason for all the sorrow: those who once loved Him had forsaken Him. He could not forget the kindness of their early years, when they first went after Him. He remembered the love they had when they were first joined to Him. But now He complains again and again: they have "gone far from Me"; they have "forsaken Me"; they have "turned their back to Me"; they have "forgotten Me" (see vv. 2, 5, 13, 17, 19, 27, and 32).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The same root in the church

One writer sees the same breakdown repeated in the church:

As Israel of old broke down in responsibility as the witness for the LORD, so the church has utterly failed as a witness for Christ. In both cases the failure goes back to loss of first love... So too the Lord's own words expose the root of all the failure of the church as a light for Christ in the world: "You have abandoned the love you had at first" (Rev. 2:4).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Hear — God does not wait for willing listeners; He sends His word into ears that had stopped listening.

- Whole — the summons reaches every family of Jacob. God still owned them as His people even while He charged them.

- Appeal — God calls them to hear a plea, not a verdict. He reminds them of the promise made at the start.

- Unchanged — what wrong did their fathers find in Him? Nothing. Nothing on God's side had altered.

- Love — the whole complaint traces back to one root: forsaken first love. The Lord exposes that same root in the church.

Jeremiah 2:5 · Darby

Thus saith Jehovah What injustice have your fathers found in me, that they are gone far from me, and have walked after vanity, and become vain?

God opens His case against Israel with a question, not with a list of their crimes. He asks them to name one fault in Him — and then ties their drifting away from Him to their chasing after empty things.

God asks them to name His fault

The Lord speaks first as the accused, not the accuser. He invites His people to bring evidence against Him.

The appeal starts with a moving question: what wrong had their fathers found in Him, that they went far from Him and went after empty things? Was there anything unrighteous in Him? Had He dealt in a treacherous way? Was the fault in the LORD that they had left Him?

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The question also exposes them. Their forgetting was not innocent.

Was the Lord at fault when their fathers went after empty things? Were they not deliberately blind? They did not feel His goodness when He brought them out of the furnace of Egypt, through the bleak desert, and into His good land — the land they then defiled and made detestable.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

No change on His side

If God has not changed, they walked every step of the distance themselves. One writer applies it to us: His blessings can make people careless.

Have I failed towards you in goodness? What is the matter now? Is the Lord changed? Is He worth less now than when you went after Him in the wilderness? No; but we have gone far from Him, gone after empty things, and become empty ourselves. We have enjoyed His blessing, grown fat, and kicked back at Him. So we have fallen into the weakness and misery of our own hearts.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Following emptiness makes people empty

The verse ends where the walking led: they became what they went after. One commentator puts the rule bluntly.

Those who make idols "are like them." They have no wisdom and no ability to think straight. They have brought themselves down to the level of empty "nothings." And this is true of everyone who trusts in such empty things.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

A loss they never felt

In the next verse, nobody asks, "Where is the LORD?" That silence is the most alarming sign of all.

What a touching plea for the Lord to bring before His people. They had lost His presence, and they were not aware of the loss. "They did not say, 'Where is the LORD who brought us up out of the land of Egypt?'" They had forgotten both the grace of the Lord and the kindness of the Lord.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The same story told twice

The complaint traces back to cooled affection, and writers see the pattern repeating in the Christian era, where the Lord says to a church in Revelation, "you have abandoned the love you had at first."

We know that in its early days the church was promised to Christ as a pure bride. Long ago Israel broke down in its responsibility as the witness for the LORD. Sadly, the church has failed just as completely as a witness for Christ. In both cases the failure goes back to the loss of first love.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The reckoning is heavier now, not lighter, because God has given more.

Their folly and ingratitude were worse than that of the surrounding nations. That was the failure of the nation God had chosen. The failure of the Christian world is even greater. God has shown greater love in the gift of His Son, and has given greater blessing and deliverance.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What keeps a heart close

If fault-finding is the first step away, then satisfaction is the thing that holds a person in place.

Finding fault with the Lord leads to leaving Him. Being satisfied with the Lord keeps us in the safe place... Enjoying the Lord's fellowship, in keeping with the favour He has shown us, is itself a protecting power.

Modernised from Henrik GautesenOriginal wording

Memory is a weapon. Gideon was one of Israel's early leaders. When he recalled what God had been to Israel at the start, God sent him out in that strength.

Gideon remembered what God had been to Israel in the days when they were first joined to Him, and that memory was the secret of his strength. He was near enough to God to ask, "Where is the LORD?" — and then what a burden falls off the heart.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- The question — God does not begin with their sins; He asks them to name a fault in Him. No answer comes.

- The distance — He has not changed. They walked every step of the distance themselves, often while enjoying His blessings.

- The emptiness — Going after nothing makes a person nothing. Whatever you trust, you come to resemble.

- The numbness — The worst part was silence: they had lost His presence and did not notice the loss.

- The return — Fault-finding drives us away. Satisfaction in Him keeps us near, and remembering what He was at the start brings strength back.

Jeremiah 2:6 · Darby

And they said not, Where is Jehovah, that brought us up out of the land of Egypt, that led us in the wilderness, in a land of deserts and of pits, in a land of drought and of the shadow of death, in a land that no one passeth through, and where no man dwelleth?

God's charge in this chapter is not that Israel argued with Him but that they stopped asking after Him. The hardships listed here — desert, pits, drought, deep darkness, empty land — mark the road He led them along. Not one of them looked back to ask where He was.

The question nobody asked

God points to a change in them, not in Himself. One writer hears in the verse the plea of a God who has not changed:

What a touching plea for the Lord to bring before His people. Had He changed since that day? Ah no, there was no change on His side. They had lost His presence, and they were not even aware of the loss. "They did not say, 'Where is the LORD who brought us up from the land of Egypt?'" They had forgotten both the grace of the Lord and the kindness of the Lord.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

"The shadow of death"

The ESV says "deep darkness" where older versions say "the shadow of death." One writer explains what the word carries, in Psalm 23 and here:

The word here translated shadow of death means darkness, or dangers that may threaten death. It does not mean physical death itself. We find it used in the same sense elsewhere in the book of Psalms 44:19; 107:10, 14; so also Isa. 9:2; Jer. 2:6.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Words borrowed from Moses

Jeremiah is not inventing this description. His wording reaches back to the books of Moses. One writer uses this to show the law already existed, and already had its name, before anyone found the book:

Both testify to the existence of the Law. Jeremiah 2:8 says, "Those who handle the law do not know me." Jeremiah 8:8 says, "How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us'?" So before anyone found the book, "The Law" existed and was called "The Law of the Lord." … Here are allusions, in sense or in word or both, to Deuteronomy 8:15; Numbers 14:7-8; Leviticus 18:25-28; Numbers 35:33-34.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The desert was the evidence

The emptiness of the route is itself the argument. No one crosses a land with no water, no road and no people unless God goes with them. Gideon later drew his courage from that memory:

They were in the wilderness, in a land of deserts and pits, and God brought them safely through. That was the very proof that God was with them. They went on badly enough. They went back in heart to Egypt, and Dathan and Abiram despised Him. Still, their being there in the wilderness proved that they cared for the Lord enough to follow Him. And the Lord here complains … that no heart looked back to that time. Now Gideon did plead in this way. His faith was in the Lord who brought them out of Egypt, and this was the secret of his strength. For God said to him, "Go, in this your might."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why God treasures the desert years

God names the barren road on purpose. The reason is what that road left them with:

"You went after Me in the wilderness, where there was nothing to set your affections on but Myself. I Myself was the whole and sole object of your affections." This is what God remembered. He overlooks all failure. The condition God notices is that He Himself was everything to them. This is what marks a heart when it is first converted to God — the Lord is everything to it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where the charge lands today

One writer follows where that forgetting led, and says the same charge now falls harder:

They had not thought about His faithfulness. He had led them out of Egypt, through the desert and the shadows of death. They forgot it, and when Jehovah brought them to the land of promise they defiled the land. Priests, pastors and prophets had turned away. … Their folly and ingratitude were worse than that of the heathen nations. Such was the failure of the favoured nation. The failure of Christendom is even greater. Think of the greater display of God's love in the gift of His Son, and the greater blessing and deliverance.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Where — The whole verse turns on a question never asked. Forgetting is not open rebellion. Israel just stopped asking after the God who led them out.

- Wilderness — The desert, drought and deep darkness did not prove God was absent. They proved He was there, for no one crosses such a land alone.

- Wanted — God remembers the wilderness because there He alone held their affection. That is the mark of a heart just turned to Him.

- Weight — Jeremiah echoes the books of Moses, so the charge uses words Israel already had in their hands.

- Warning — Priests, pastors and prophets turned away with the people. Commentators press the point: a greater deliverance in Christ leaves us more to remember, not less.

Jeremiah 2:7 · Darby

And I brought you into a fruitful land, to eat the fruit thereof and the good thereof; and ye entered and defiled my land, and made my heritage an abomination.

The Charge of Ingratitude

This whole section is God's appeal to a people who no longer felt what He had done for them. One writer asks whether the fault could possibly lie with God.

Nothing is more moving than the Lord's appeal. He reminds them of the promise they made and the devotion they gave to Jehovah at the start of their history. Was it wrong in the Lord that their fathers walked after emptiness? Were they not ignorant by choice? They did not feel His goodness in bringing them out of the furnace of Egypt, through the dreary desert, and into His good land. And that land they had made defiled and an abomination.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Whose Land It Was

God does not call it their land. Israel had won the territory by fighting, but the deeper title was never theirs to hold.

We must keep in mind that Israel had the land of their possession from Jehovah. No doubt they drove out or subdued the Canaanites. As men would say, they held it by right of conquest. But a deeper fact lay underneath the victories of Joshua. God gave them strength to put down the most corrupt race then on the face of the earth. Those people had pushed into a land that He had, from the first, marked out and promised to the fathers.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

We need not be surprised at the language, for when God chooses for His people, He always chooses the best.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

How They Defiled It

The defiling was idol worship, spread over the whole countryside, and it broke a promise they had made at Mount Sinai.

God had rescued them from Egypt, and they had promised, at Sinai, not to transgress. Sadly, they set up the golden calf before the law even reached the camp. The long list of later idolatries showed how they had broken the covenant. "High places" for idol worship dotted the whole land. In the shade of every green tree the people practised the abominations of the pagan nations.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The rot was not only among the people. The next verse names the religious leaders too.

He had brought them out of Egypt, and He had brought them into Canaan. But somehow they had lost all touch with God, and had fallen into gross idolatry... Such was the low state in Israel. Priests, pastors, prophets, and people had alike forgotten the Lord. We have here what you may call downright backsliding in heart. There are many believers in such a state today, sadly!

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Root of the Failure

Why does plenty so often end in ruin? One writer points to the gap between the gift and the Giver.

They felt their own importance, and forgot the Lord; they had the blessing, and did not want the Lord of the blessing. And is this not true of the church of God? We bring in self, which is only a broken cistern, and depart from Him who is the living fountain and power of blessing.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same danger is put plainly as a question every reader can ask of himself:

Are we not likely to forget the Lord our God, to rest in His gifts instead of Himself? Sadly, we cannot deny it. We rest in the stream, instead of getting up to the Fountain.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What God Wanted the Land to Be

The land was a good place for people to live. Whether it became a place for God to live is another question.

God certainly made that land a place where the chosen people could live, for it was a good land, flowing with milk and honey. But they did not make it a place where God could live... But when Israel failed and Canaan became an abomination God was not defeated... God could only secure people for Himself, as He wanted, by bringing them into this wonderful relationship with Himself. Knowing Him as Father, their hearts would be satisfied, and so they would be secured for ever for God's own satisfaction.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Another writer sets Israel's inheritance beside the one Christians hold now:

Every Israelite knew what it was to have an inheritance. As a nation, their inheritance was the land of Canaan. They received it. But sadly it was later corrupted, defiled by idolatry, and lost. Their Christian inheritance is just the opposite: "imperishable, undefiled, and unfading" (1 Peter 1:4).

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — God chose the plentiful land and handed it over. When He chooses for His people, He always chooses the best.

- Owned — He calls it "My land," "My heritage"; conquest gave Israel possession, but never title.

- Defiled — idol worship on every high hill and under every green tree turned the gift into an abomination. Priests, prophets and people alike joined in.

- Diagnosed — they had the blessing and did not want the Lord of the blessing. Self is a broken cistern; He is the living fountain.

- Answered — God was not defeated. He brings people to know Him as Father, and the inheritance He gives is imperishable, undefiled and unfading.

Jeremiah 2:8 · Darby

The priests said not, Where is Jehovah? and they that handled the law knew me not; and the shepherds transgressed against me; and the prophets prophesied by Baal, and walked after [things that] do not profit.

The verse names four groups: priests, teachers of the law, shepherds and prophets. Each one failed God in the same way. Their sin is not loud rebellion. It is a missing question — nobody among Israel's leaders asked where the Lord was. (The ESV says "shepherds" here; older translations say "pastors," and some of the writers below comment on that word.)

They kept the blessing and lost the Giver

Israel's drift starts earlier in the chapter. They kept God's gifts and lost their appetite for God Himself.

They felt their own importance, and forgot the Lord; they had the blessing, and did not want the Lord of the blessing (v. 6-8). And is this not true of the church of God? We bring in self, which is only a broken cistern, and turn away from Him, who is the living fountain and power of blessing.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The question nobody asked

The priests never asked, "Where is the Lord?" One writer points to Gideon, a man who did ask.

Is the Lord changed? Is He worth less now than when you went after Him in the wilderness? No; but we have got far from Him, and have gone after empty things, and have become empty… So it was with Gideon; Judges 6. He remembered what God had been to Israel in the days when He first took them as His bride. He said, "Did not the Lord bring us up from Egypt?" And the Lord looked at him and said, "Go in this your might." Gideon's memory of what God was to Israel in those early days was the secret of his strength. In Gideon was a soul near enough to God to say, "Where is the Lord?"

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Handling the law, not knowing God

The men who handled God's law did not know Him. They boasted in the temple and in the law instead.

Hypocrites may "enter in at these gates to worship the Lord," trusting in lying words: "The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord" (Jer. 7:4). But such sayings did not take the place of inward reality before God. It only made their case worse. "Those who handle the law did not know Me," says the Lord (Jer. 2:8). God had entrusted them with "the oracles of God" (Rom. 3:2), and they said, "We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us" (Jer. 8:8). Yet again we hear an answering echo in Romans: "You who boast in the law dishonor God by breaking the law" (Rom. 2:23).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Leaders and people alike

The failure ran from the leaders down to the people — and it still happens.

He had brought them out of Egypt, and He had brought them into Canaan. But somehow they had lost all touch with God, and had fallen into open idol worship… That was how low Israel had sunk. Priests, pastors, prophets, and people had alike forgotten the Lord. We have here what you may call downright backsliding in heart. There are many believers in such a state today, alas!

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The shepherds who scattered the sheep

The word behind "pastors" is about food, not office.

The word for pastor is "raah," meaning "to feed." Translators render it "pastor" only in Jeremiah; elsewhere they usually render it "shepherd"… It appears to cover all those who care for and feed the flock of God.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Instead of feeding the flock, these men ruined it.

They trampled the vineyard of the Lord, and made His pleasant portion desolate, so that it mourned to Him (Jer. 12:10-11). The Lord says, "My people have been lost sheep, and their shepherds (pastors) have led them astray" (Jer. 50:6). He pronounces woe on these scattering, selfish pastors (Jer. 23:1-2).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Prophets who used God's name for a lie

Not every prophet of that time was false. The ones in this verse spoke by Baal, chased what brings no profit, and still used the Lord's name.

The worst of them, though moving among God's people, "prophesied by Baal and went after things that do not profit" (Jer. 2:8); "The prophets prophesy falsely" (Jer. 5:31), and yet they used the Lord's name, though He "did not send them" (Jer. 14:15).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What God promises instead

The prophet who exposes these leaders also points ahead — to shepherds God will give, and to one Shepherd.

It is refreshing and cheering to find Jeremiah speaking of the time when the Lord will give pastors after His own heart, "who will feed you with knowledge and understanding" (Jer. 3:15)… He also tells of One from David's line, the shepherd king, who will be raised up, and in His days "Israel will dwell securely" (Jer. 23:5-6); the believer knows this Shepherd now, and receives eternal life from Him before He returns to gather Israel.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- The question — "Where is the Lord?" is the test. Gideon asked it, and God sent him out in strength. The priests stopped asking, and the nation collapsed.

- The gift kept, the Giver dropped — Israel had the blessing but no longer wanted the Lord of the blessing.

- Handling is not knowing — men can carry the law, quote the temple, and still not know God; the boast makes the case worse, not better.

- Feeders who starve the flock — "pastor" means to feed; these shepherds scattered the flock instead, and the Lord pronounces woe on them.

- God's answer — He promises shepherds after His own heart who feed with knowledge and understanding, and one Shepherd, of David's line, whom believers know now.

Jeremiah 2:9 · Darby

Therefore will I yet plead with you, saith Jehovah, and with your children's children will I plead.

God has just set out His case against Judah: fathers who wandered, and priests, leaders and prophets who turned away. Verse 9 is His answer to that record — not a sentence passed, but a case He keeps pressing, on into generations not yet born.

after_note: DELETE

The case He states

Older translations read "plead" here. Why does God argue with people who have already left Him? He starts by stating a case, and the charge sheet is the verses just before. One writer follows the order of the argument. God first asks what fault they ever found in Him. Then He recalls His own faithfulness. Only then does He bring the charge:

The appeal starts with a moving question: "What wrong have your fathers found in Me, that they have gone far from Me, and have followed what is worthless, and have become worthless?" Was there anything unrighteous in Him? Had He dealt in a treacherous way? Was the fault in Jehovah that they had left Him? They had not thought of His faithfulness as He had led them out of Egypt, through the desert and the shadows of death. They forgot it, and when Jehovah brought them to the promised land they defiled it. Priests, pastors and prophets had turned away. So Jehovah states His case to plead with them and their children.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Pleading is itself grace

A judge with a watertight case does not normally argue with the accused. The whole chapter is read as evidence of what God is like rather than only of what Judah was like:

Jeremiah 2 contains a most touching appeal to the people at Jerusalem. It needs no explanation, but deserves the heart's serious attention. It testifies in the most striking manner to the kindness and tender love of the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

And with your children's children

God does not stop with the generation standing in front of Him. One writer sets that beside a search of the nations for anything like Israel's unfaithfulness:

Next, how slow is the Lord to abandon His people, pleading with those before Him then, and on to their children's children! They could go where they pleased — north-west or south-east, to Greeks or to Arabians. They would hear of no nation as false to its false gods as Israel was to the true God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What He actually argues

Verse 9 announces the plea; verses 10–13 deliver it. God sends them west to Chittim and east to Kedar to find any nation that ever swapped its gods — and the argument lands on a single practical test:

"Therefore I still contend with you, declares the LORD, and with your children's children I will contend… Has a nation changed their gods, which are yet no gods? but my people have changed their glory for that which does not profit"… This is His plea. Did the nations — the heathen — ever do what My people have done? My people have changed their glory for that which does not profit. You will find all through Scripture that what profits is the great point. If there has been departure from God, has it profited you?

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The root of the whole controversy

Behind the idols lies something simpler and sadder. One writer traces the nation's ruin back to a single starting point:

The Lord's appeal to Israel through the prophet Jeremiah shows us how the nation came to ruin as a people responsible to Him. It all goes back to one source. They lost the love for the LORD with which they began their history as a people called out from the nations.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why it is still addressed to us

These chapters are not treated as a closed file on an ancient nation. The same pleading tone runs through nearly the whole first half of the book:

Jeremiah 1 to 24 is full of the pleadings, the gracious pleadings, of Jehovah with His rebellious, backsliding, guilty, but beloved people… At the time of the prophecy the moral state of Judah was terrible. Every class shared the guilt of having forgotten and forsaken Jehovah. Kings and subjects, high and low, rich and poor, pastors and people, prophets and priests — all alike had fallen and were guilty.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Charge. "Therefore" looks back over the record just given. God recalls His own faithfulness, points to priests, leaders and prophets who had turned away, and then states His case.

- Grace. That He argues at all is the point. The appeal itself shows the kindness and tender love of the Lord.

- Reach. The pleading stretches beyond the guilty generation to their children's children. That is how slow He is to let His people go.

- Proof. He sends them west and east to find one nation that ever traded its gods away; none had. Only His people exchanged their glory for what does not profit.

- Root. Under the idols lies lost love. One question still tests every heart: has leaving God ever profited you?

Jeremiah 2:10 · Darby

For pass over to the isles of Chittim, and see; and send unto Kedar, and consider diligently, and see if there have been such a thing.

In Jeremiah 2 the Lord pleads His case with His own people. He sends them west to Cyprus and east to Kedar to look for one nation that has done what Judah has done — and He already knows they will find none.

When the appeal came

This section of Jeremiah belongs to a moment when religion looked healthy on the surface.

Jeremiah 2 to 6. This section is an appeal to Jerusalem. It warns them about what had already happened to Israel, and calls them to repent. It was given in the days of Josiah. There had been a reformation then, but the people had not turned to God with the whole heart.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why He sends them looking at all

The order to travel is not a threat. It is part of a plea that stretches over generations.

See how slow the Lord is to give up His people! He pleads with those standing in front of Him then, and with their children's children. They could go wherever they liked — north-west or south-east, to the Greeks or to the Arabs. They would hear of no nation as false to its false gods as Israel was to the true God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two places at opposite ends of the map

Chittim is the older word behind the ESV's "coasts of Cyprus":

"Chittim" strictly means the island of Cyprus. But in Scripture the name stands for the West as a whole, seen from the Holy Land as God's centre.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Kedar lies the other way — a people of tents rather than ships:

Son of Ishmael, and founder of an important tribe living in the north-west of Arabia. The name is probably also used for Arabs in general. The mentions of lambs, rams, goats, flocks, camels, tents and tent-curtains show that a wandering people is meant.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Island and desert, west and east: the search covers the whole known world.

What the search turns up

The verse asks for a careful check, not a quick glance. Search as far as you like, and the report comes back the same.

Israel "had forsaken Him days without number"; they had done a terrible thing, such as no other nation had done.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Not worse than the nations — nearer to God

If the nations come out looking better here, it is easy to draw the wrong conclusion.

We would completely miss the lesson meant for us if we concluded that they were worse than other people. They are exceptional only in this: God brought them into a closer visible relationship with Himself than anyone else... Does this prove, as it might seem, that Israel was worse than the nations? No — if all they had were false gods, they would not have changed them either!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The loyalty of Kedar and Cyprus costs them nothing, because there is nothing real to be loyal to. Israel alone had the true God to leave.

The question the survey leaves behind

The comparison does not stay in ancient geography. Its sharp end is one word: profit.

This is His plea. Did the nations ever do what My people have done? My people have changed their glory for that which does not profit. You will find all through Scripture that what profits is the great point. If there has been departure from God, has it profited you?

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Plea. The order to travel is a plea, not a verdict. God pleads with the people in front of Him and with their children's children.

- West. "The coasts of Cyprus" (Chittim) stands for the sea and the far west, seen from the Holy Land as God's centre.

- East. Kedar came from Ishmael. The name stands for Arab tribes who lived in tents with their flocks and camels — the opposite direction, the opposite way of life.

- Verdict. The search comes back empty both ways. No nation ever swapped its gods, worthless as they were. Israel did what no other people had done.

- Reason. Their guilt was not that they were worse by nature. God had brought them nearer to Himself than anyone else. The question He leaves hanging is simple: has leaving Him ever profited anyone?

Jeremiah 2:11 · Darby

Hath a nation changed [its] gods? and they are no gods; -- but my people have changed their glory for that which doth not profit.

God does not argue His case here. He points to the nations and asks a question: has any of them ever traded away its gods? No. That answer measures what Israel has done.

The Plea Behind the Question

The question comes from a God who keeps pleading with a people who have turned away. He tells them to look at the nations and see.

How slow the Lord is to give up on His people! He pleads with those standing before Him, and with their children's children. Go where they pleased — north-west or south-east, to the Greeks or to the Arabians. They would hear of no people so false to their false gods as Israel was to the true God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "Their Glory" Was

What was "their glory"? Not a possession and not an achievement. Writing about the golden calf, one commentator names it:

They cast aside their proper glory and become occupied with what debases them. That Jehovah was their God was their glory; but they would make gods for themselves.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Nearness, Not Wickedness

It would be easy to read this verse as proof that Israel was the worst of nations. One writer gives a different reason for their fall: not deeper corruption, but nearer light.

Do not suppose they were worse than other people. They stand apart only in this: God brought them into a closer, visible relationship with Himself than any other nation… If we do not judge ourselves fully, and give ourselves to Him with the whole heart, then the more we feel His presence, the more unbearable it becomes… Does this prove, as it might seem, that Israel were worse than the nations? No — if they had only had false gods, they would not have changed those either! It is the light, precisely as light, that men must reject when their unchanged hearts want the cover of darkness for their evil deeds.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Idolaters Put Them to Shame

The comparison shames Israel. Idol worshippers stayed loyal to gods that were no gods. Israel walked away from the true God. The same writer points to the Philistines at Ashdod. Their idol Dagon lay broken, yet they still would not step on his threshold.

The path leads downward. Israel left her true God and sinned in a way that the nations with their false gods would have been ashamed to do… The Philistines at Ashdod would not tread on the threshold of their broken Dagon (1 Sam. 5:5). They might well be ashamed of Israel's behaviour.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The Craving Underneath

Why make the exchange at all? One writer looks at what the heart is really after.

So man's heart craves a god; sadly, one cannot say it craves God — that is another matter. Israel knew the true God. He had shown Himself to them in a way you would think would win their hearts to Himself forever. What answer did they in fact give Him? For a long time they simply set up the idols of their defeated enemies — the very nations God had driven out for those same sins!

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The Test of Profit

God's last word on the exchange is not "wrong" but "worthless." That turns the verse into a question anyone can answer.

This is His plea. Did the nations ever do what My people have done?… All through Scripture, what profits is the great point. If there has been departure from God, has it profited you?

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The same writer brings the test home to daily life.

The things of time and sense — the business, the duties, even the cares of life — we have to face. But if they eclipse Christ, is it profitable? Ask your own heart. It will say No, emphatically. There is a striking word: "He gave them their request, but sent leanness into their soul" (Ps. 106:15).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

(The ESV renders Psalm 106:15: "he gave them what they asked, but sent a wasting disease among them.")

The Cost of Wandering

Godliness pays. Leaving God does not. One writer weighs both sides:

If godliness has profit in this life as well as in the life to come, how sure and complete is the loss brought on by a will that wanders from the Source of every good!

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Glory given. Israel's glory was not a thing they owned. It was a Person they belonged to: Jehovah was their God.

- Glory exchanged. They set that glory aside and took up what degrades them. The golden calf showed the same pattern.

- Exchange without parallel. No nation traded its gods. The Philistines still honoured a broken idol. Israel let go of the true God.

- Nearness raises the stakes. They were not worse than their neighbours. They were nearer to the light. Had they held only false gods, they would never have swapped them.

- Profit is the test. The exchange brings no profit. Ask your own heart, and it agrees.

Jeremiah 2:12 · Darby

Be astonished, ye heavens, at this, and shudder; be amazed very much, saith Jehovah.

In Jeremiah 2 the Lord is making His case against a people who had drifted from Him. Here He turns from them to the sky, calling the heavens to look — why summon creation as a witness to what Israel has done?

Why God calls the heavens to look

reason: unsupported claims

They could go wherever they pleased — north-west or south-east, to Greeks or to Arabians: they would hear of no one so false to their false gods as Israel was to the true God. No wonder the heavens are amazed and afraid and utterly desolate at the sight! God's people were guilty of two such evils: they forsook Him, the fountain of living waters, and hewed out cisterns for themselves — broken cisterns that hold no water!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The summons itself is startling. Notice also the name God gives Himself as He speaks.

Is it not an extraordinary thing that God calls on the heavens to gaze on a backsliding people? "They have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters." What a lovely title! What a wonderful thing to be in touch with that fountain. How God brings Himself before us in all the freshness of His grace, and the living energy of His love.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The two evils

The next verse names what the heavens must look at. There is not one wrong here, but two.

The two evils are forsaking the Lord, the fountain of living waters, and hewing out cisterns for themselves, broken cisterns that can hold no water. The Lord was the storehouse of the living waters, put at the disposal of His people without money and without price. But instead of confessing, "All my springs are in Thee," they had left Him, the source of life and comfort, and turned to broken cisterns of their own invention, as well as to the idols, and worshipped them. It is the same among the professing people of God today; the two evils are present with us also.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Grief, not only verdict

The tone of the summons matters. God grieves as He speaks, and He still turns to His people with a question.

With sorrowful eloquence and pitiful pleading He exclaims, "Be appalled, O heavens, at this; be shocked, be utterly desolate, declares the LORD" (Jer. 2:12)! Yet with what condescension and consideration He asks them, "Have I been a wilderness to Israel? a land of darkness" (v. 31)?

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The aim of the shock

Language this strong has a purpose. People who have settled for less do not feel the loss until something breaks in on them.

The self-satisfied condition of the people must be broken in upon; they must be awakened, and made to feel their poverty and the greatness of their loss.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Part of the danger is that the decline is silent to the person living it.

Unknown to himself, the "spiritual dry-rot" has set in, conduct, character and conversation becoming infected and infectious.

Modernised from W G TurnerOriginal wording

What God still remembers

There is more here than shock. The God who calls the heavens also remembers what He once was to this people.

He overlooks all failure, and the condition God notices is that He Himself was everything to them; and this is what marks a heart when it is first converted to God — the Lord is everything to it.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Commentators press the same choice on readers today:

What folly it was for Israel to turn away from Him... What folly it is to turn away from Him today!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Exchange. No nation was so false to its false gods as Israel was to the true God. God calls the heavens to look at the trade.

- Two evils. They left the fountain, then cut their own cisterns. The second evil always follows the first.

- Free. They walked away from living water offered without money and without price. That is what makes the leaving appalling.

- Awaken. The shock has a purpose. It breaks in on a self-satisfied people and makes them feel the size of their loss.

- Remembered. God names their first love, not their failures. The same fountain and the same folly stand before us today.

Jeremiah 2:13 · Darby

For my people have committed two evils they have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters, to hew them out cisterns, broken cisterns that hold no water.

God brings a charge against His own people, and it has two counts. The order matters, and so does the picture: a spring that never stops flowing, set against hand-cut tanks that leak out everything poured in.

Two Evils, in Order

The two sins are not in random order. One writer notes that the second always follows the first.

"I am displaced," He says. "I do not have My place in the heart of Israel. You have put Me out of My place, you have forsaken Me." That is the first thing, dear friends. Do not be deceived about it at all. You never go and hew out broken cisterns first. People never turn to the world first — they give up God first, they give up Christ first.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

What They Left Behind

The title God gives Himself here describes what was on offer, and at what price.

The Lord was the storehouse of the living waters. He put them at His people's disposal without money and without price. They should have confessed, "All my springs are in You." Instead they left Him, the source of life and comfort. They turned to broken cisterns of their own invention, and to the idols, and worshipped them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What Counts As a Broken Cistern

A cistern is a tank cut out of rock to hold rainwater. These are man-made and cracked, so the test is not how impressive the substitute looks.

Broken cisterns! It does not matter whether they are big or small. The point is, if my cistern is not Christ, it is a broken cistern. Sadly, how many believers today are trying to drink at broken cisterns. A broken cistern cannot hold water. Anything short of Christ will fail to satisfy my thirst.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The substitute is not always an idol. It can be other people.

How ready we are on every occasion to look to our fellow-men for sympathy, help and advice instead of looking directly and only to God! This is a serious mistake. In principle it is to forsake the Fountain of living waters, and hew out for ourselves broken cisterns which can hold no water. What can we expect? What must the outcome be? Barrenness and desolation. Our God, in real faithfulness to us, will let our fellow-man fail us, so that we may learn how foolish it is to lean on human strength.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Double Loss

One writer finds two losses here, not one.

First, they forsook the LORD, and so of course lost all joy and happiness. Then, since they had to have something, they hewed out for themselves cisterns that can hold no water. They turned to the world and tried to find in it what they had lost in forsaking the LORD. But they lost more than their own joy and happiness. They also lost their power of bearing fruit, for we read, "from me comes your fruit."

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

The Taste of the Empty Cistern

The emptiness is not theory. One writer describes the state of soul it leaves behind.

We often have to learn, through seas of sorrow, that the cisterns we turn to are truly broken and hold no water. The only thing our drifting leaves us with is an aching emptiness, a torn and dissatisfied heart. It is a state of soul, in fact, that had no parallel in the most miserable hours of our unconverted days. Beneath many a smiling face and many a ringing laugh there is a heart of misery, trying by these means to hide the fact that it has left God.

Modernised from A. T. SchofieldOriginal wording

For Israel as a nation, the loss was not only inward. Gaebelein notes that the invasions later in the chapter came "as the fruit of having forsaken the fountain of living water."

The Fountain Standing Among Them

The Fountain later stood among the same people, and made an offer.

This was Israel's condition exactly when He, with whom was "the fountain of life," was among them. Their self-righteousness and pride kept them from letting Him convince them of their wickedness. So He appealed to their unsatisfied hearts. On "the last day of the feast, the great day," He cried, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink."

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Fountain. God names Himself the fountain of living waters — the storehouse of life, offered to His people free of charge.

- Forsaking. The first evil is that God loses His place in the heart. No one digs a substitute until He has lost that place.

- Hewing. The second evil is hard work with nothing to show for it: anything short of Christ is a broken cistern, however large.

- Emptiness. The cisterns deliver an aching void and a dissatisfied heart. Joy goes first, then the power to bear fruit.

- Return. The Fountain came and stood among the people who had left Him. The invitation still stands: if anyone thirsts, come and drink.

Jeremiah 2:14 · Darby

Is Israel a bondman? Is he a home-born [slave]? Why is he become a spoil?

This question is not a request for information. God sets Israel's ruin beside Israel's standing and asks how both can be true at once: a people He freed from Egypt, now carried off as plunder.

The tone of the question

This question belongs to a long stretch of pleading, and the guilt it addresses reached every level of the nation:

Jeremiah 1 to 24 is full of the Lord's pleadings — gracious pleadings — with His people. They were rebellious, backsliding, and guilty, but still beloved... The moral state and condition of Judah at the time of the prophecy were equally deplorable. All classes shared the guilt of forgetting and forsaking the Lord. Kings and subjects, high and low, rich and poor, pastors and people, prophets and priests — all alike had fallen and were guilty.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Slave, homeborn servant, son

The verse names two kinds of slave: one bought from outside, one born in the household. Israel is neither. God's own earlier word about the nation shows why the plundering makes no sense:

How can this be? "Out of Egypt I called my son," was God's word long before. He had been a slave, and God had set him free. "Why then has he become a prey?" Should someone who is free, and who knows God's love, go back into slavery?

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The shame of the plunderers

The sting is in who the attackers were — not a great power, but Egyptians from Noph and Tahpanhes, the very allies Israel had leaned on:

And why such exposure to enemies? Was Israel a slave from outside, or one born at home? Why then should he suffer the worst wrong and humiliation from the very people they trusted most — the sons of Noph and Tahpanhes — weak as they were? Forsaking the Lord was Israel's punishment and shame. Why should they drink from the river of Egypt, or from the river of Assyria? They must yet learn the bitterness of abandoning the Lord their God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What produced the enslavement

The plundering answers the two charges laid in verse 13. The choice Israel made had a result you could see in the land:

The two evils are forsaking the Lord, the fountain of living waters, and digging out their own cisterns — broken cisterns that can hold no water... The result for Israel was enslavement. The young lions came (the Assyrian invasion) and made the land waste. Noph (Memphis) and Tahpanhes (Daphnae), that is, Egypt, did the same. It came as the fruit of having forsaken the fountain of living water.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Self-inflicted, and not final

The looting was not God failing them. Their own choices came back on them. Older translations use a word here — "backsliding" — that leaves a door open:

Their hearts, away from God, longed for evil company, and received their due reward... "Your own wickedness shall correct you, and your backslidings shall reprove you. Know therefore and see that it is evil and bitter for you to forsake the Lord your God" (Jer. 2:19). Now here is the first time we get the word "backsliding"... But then it supposes recovery, and that the heart will be turned back again to God, because that is what the Lord wants.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A second reading of "home-born slave"

Commentators differ on how far the slave language goes. One writer reads it as Israel's real position under the law. That is why the Deliverer had to be born into the same position:

Israel, as seen in Christ, is the Lord's firstborn. Ephraim is still remembered as a dear son, in mercy that chose him and in a promise God will not take back. Yet while under the covenant given through Moses, he was and is like a home-born slave. So if a deliverer from that slavery was to come from Jesse's line, He had to be born in the same condition as the nation; that is, under the law.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Summary

- Son — Israel is neither a bought slave nor one born in the house; God had called him out of Egypt as His son and set him free.

- Freedom — God set him free, so a return to slavery makes no sense.

- Forsaking — the plundering follows the two evils of verse 13. Leaving the fountain of living waters ended in slavery.

- Shame — the humiliation came through Egypt, the ally Israel had trusted instead of God.

- Return — Israel brought the damage on itself. Yet "backsliding" assumes a way back, and that is what God wants.

Jeremiah 2:15 · Darby

The young lions roared against him, they gave forth their voice, and they made his land desolate his cities are burned, without inhabitant.

Jeremiah 2 is God's appeal to a people who walked away from Him, and verse 15 shows the cost: a land stripped bare and towns emptied of people. Why should a nation God rescued end up as somebody else's plunder?

The Question Behind the Verse

The roaring lions answer a question asked one verse earlier: how did a free people end up looted? One writer sharpens that question against Israel's own rescue from slavery:

This indictment is followed by a touching question. "Is Israel a servant? Is he a slave born in the house? Why has he become plunder?" (Jer. 2:14). How can this be? "Out of Egypt I called My son" was God's word long before (Ex. 4:23; Hosea 11:1). He had been a slave, and God had set him free. "Why has he become plunder?" Is the one who is free, and who knows God's love, to go back into slavery?

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why the Enemy Could Come In

Israel's exposure to attack was not bad luck. It was the shame of a people who had left God — and the insult came from the very nations they had leaned on:

And why such exposure to enemies? Was Israel a slave brought in from outside, or one born at home? Why then should he suffer the worst wrong and insult, even from those they trusted most — the sons of Noph and Tahapanes — weak as they were? Jehovah forsaken was Israel's punishment and shame. What did they have to do with drinking from the Egyptian river or from the Assyrian? They still had to learn how bitter it is to abandon the Lord their God. Long ago they had been set free and had promised obedience, but they turned to every kind of loose living. God had failed in nothing: the fault was their own, and the stain would not wash out. (Verses 14-22.)

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Noph and Tahapanes were cities in Egypt.

The Lions Identified

One writer names the invaders behind the lions, and traces the ruin to two evils named earlier in the chapter:

The two evils are these. The first is forsaking Jehovah, the fountain of living waters. The second is hewing out cisterns for themselves — broken cisterns that can hold no water… The result for Israel was enslavement. The young lions came (the Assyrian invasion) and made the land waste. Noph (Memphis) and Tahpanhes (Daphnae), that is, Egypt, did the same. It came as the fruit of having forsaken the fountain of living water.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Broken Cistern Still Empties

The wasted land is the outward form of an inward choice. What Israel took in place of God could hold nothing, and the same exchange is still on offer:

"They have forsaken Me, the fountain of living waters." What a lovely title — "fountain of living waters"! What a wonderful thing to be in touch with that fountain. How God brings Himself before us in all the freshness of His grace and the living energy of His love. "And hewed out for themselves cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water" (Jer. 2:13). Broken cisterns! It does not matter whether they are big or small. The point is, if my cistern is not Christ, it is a broken cistern.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Enemies Have Only Borrowed Power

The lions roared, but they were not the real force at work. One writer draws the rule from another invasion, and grounds it in this same chapter:

First of all, the unfaithfulness of God's people is what puts power into any enemy's hands… No might of Midian could or would have prevailed if the Lord had not permitted it. And He would not have permitted it if there had been no need in Israel's condition. Those who will not learn in fellowship with God must learn it in the hands of the enemy. "Your own wickedness will correct you, and your backslidings will rebuke you. Know therefore and see that it is an evil and bitter thing that you have forsaken the Lord your God" (Jer. 2:19).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

No Middle Ground

Judah wanted to be an ordinary nation among nations. Scripture leaves no such position open:

They had failed again and again, and so they ended up paying tribute to nations that should have been paying tribute to them. There is no neutral place for the people of God. They must either be above the world, testifying against it for God's glory, or they must be servants to it. If God does not hold Israel above the nations, the nations carry Israel away captive. They can never exist as equals. They must be either masters or slaves. Slavery was their discipline for not keeping the place of masters, and they could only keep it by having the Lord on their side… A Christian out of fellowship is always weaker than the world. The reason is simple: he has lost his strength.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Fountain — The chapter's charge is that they left the fountain of living waters. Everything in verse 15 flows from that one act.

- Cistern — What replaced Him could hold nothing. Anything short of Christ is a broken cistern, whatever its size.

- Lions — The invaders named are Assyria and Egypt, Memphis and Daphnae. The allies they trusted became the ones who plundered them.

- Waste — A free son ended up as plunder, and it was his own choice that did it: your own wickedness will correct you.

- Servitude — There is no neutral place. God's people are either above the world in testimony, or servants to it.

Jeremiah 2:16 · Darby

Even the children of Noph and Tahapanes have fed on the crown of thy head.

Two Egyptian cities are named here as the ones who shamed Judah: the nation Judah leaned on for protection is the one that struck the blow. So who were these places, and how did the people God once freed from Egypt end up wounded by Egyptian hands?

Noph and Tahpanhes

Both names stand for Egypt. One writer identifies them and links the wound directly to what the chapter has already charged the people with:

There are two evils. They left the LORD, the fountain of living waters. And they cut out cisterns for themselves — broken cisterns that can hold no water… The result for Israel was slavery. The young lions came (the Assyrian invasion) and made the land waste. Noph (Memphis) and Tahpanhes (Daphnae), that is, Egypt, did the same. It came as the fruit of having forsaken the fountain of living water.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Noph is the older name for Memphis, "the capital of lower or northern Egypt," and the name used "in Jeremiah and Ezekiel" (Morrish Bible Dictionary).

Struck by the allies they trusted

The shame lay in who struck the blow. One writer reads the verse with the question just before it, which asks whether Israel is a slave:

And why such exposure to enemies? Was Israel a slave bought from outside, or a slave born in the house? Why else should he suffer such gross wrong and shame from the very people he trusted most — the sons of Noph and Tahpanhes — weak as they were? Forsaking the Lord was Israel's punishment and shame.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A wound they brought on themselves

The next verse points to who brought the wound about. One writer reads the passage as a single argument: the wound, its cause, and the useless errand to Egypt's river. The older translation he uses says "broken the crown of your head" where the ESV says "shaved the crown of your head."

Later their moral corruption was hurrying on the sorrows of the Babylonian captivity. At that time the Lord protested to them through His prophet Jeremiah: "The children of Noph and Tahpanhes have broken the crown of your head. Have you not brought this on yourself by forsaking the Lord your God when He led you in the way? And now what have you to do with Egypt, to drink the waters of the Nile? Or what have you to do in the way of Assyria, to drink the waters of the river?" Israel had their own "fountain of living waters," if only they had known how to value it. They should never have been in debt to the streams of Egypt or of the nations around them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer turns the same logic into a rule for every reader:

All that came upon them was the fruit of their own doing. "Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life" (Gal. 6:7-8). We cannot sow a handful of seed without the crop that seed produces coming up.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why Egypt could never help

Egypt was never a neutral partner. It had a fixed character, and that character decided what its help was worth.

The world is a definite sphere. In it the principles of man are supreme and at work, under the influence of Satan, "the god of this world"… "Egypt" had its wisdom, its policy and its power. But Egypt could only be the oppressor or the corrupter of the people of God. Nothing in Israel's history is more moving than their constant longing for Egypt. They longed for it despite all they had suffered there, and despite all God had done to deliver them from it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same writer pictures Egypt as a broken support: "Egypt gave no help to Israel and only wounded them badly. It was like a staff that breaks under the weight of the man leaning on it and pierces his hand. Whenever God's people turn to Egypt (a picture of the world) for help and form sinful alliances, they harm and shame themselves" (Arno Clemens Gaebelein).

Tahpanhes appears again

The warning did not take. The second city named here shows up later in Jeremiah's own life story:

A city in Lower Egypt, where Pharaoh had a house, and where the people of Judah fled in disobedience after the murder of Gedaliah, taking Jeremiah and Baruch with them. Jeremiah prophesied that the king of Babylon would set his throne in that city and strike the land of Egypt. Jer. 2:16; Jer. 43:7-9; Jer. 44:1; Jer. 46:14; Ezek. 30:18.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The wound goes back to one root. Judah left "the fountain of living waters" for cisterns that hold nothing.

- Wound. The blow came from Noph and Tahpanhes — that is, Egypt. These were the very allies Judah leaned on, and they were weak themselves.

- Self-inflicted. The trouble was their own harvest from their own sowing; they could not blame God.

- Character. Egypt could only oppress or corrupt God's people. Leaning on it was always going to pierce the hand.

- Repeat. Tahpanhes shows up again in Jeremiah 43. Judah fled there in disobedience. The city that wounded them became the city they ran to.

Jeremiah 2:17 · Darby

Hast thou not procured this unto thyself, in that thou hast forsaken Jehovah thy God, at the time he was leading thee in the way?

In Jeremiah 2 God reaches for the conscience of His people. This verse presses the question of blame: Israel's wounds came from Israel's own hand — and they walked away while God was still leading them.

The trouble was self-made

One writer reads it alongside the law of sowing and reaping.

Read this second chapter carefully. Follow it out for yourself, and notice how God seeks to reach the conscience as well as the heart. "Have you not brought this upon yourself by forsaking the LORD your God, when He led you in the way?" (v. 17). Everything that came upon them was the fruit of their own doing. "Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life" (Gal. 6:7-8). We cannot sow a handful of seed without the crop that seed produces coming up. If sorrow and trial come, what is it? It is the fruit of some seed we sowed years and years ago, when we were away from the Lord.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The surrounding verses show Israel humbled by Egyptian cities. One writer asks how a free people came to that.

And why such exposure to enemies? Was Israel a slave brought in from outside, or one born at home? Was that why he had to suffer the worst wrong and insult, even from those they trusted most — the sons of Noph and Tahpanhes — weak as they were? Their forsaking of the LORD was Israel's punishment and shame. What had they to do with drinking of the Egyptian river or of the Assyrian? They must yet learn the bitterness of abandoning the LORD their God. (vv. 14-19.) Long before, God had set them free, and they promised obedience — then they turned to every kind of immorality. God had failed in no case: the fault was their own.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Leaving the Guide mid-journey

"When He led you in the way" fixes the timing of the offence. One writer pictures the prophet forcing them to look at it.

But Israel had already forsaken their God at the very time He was leading them in the way (Jer. 2:17). What a bitter experience it is to forsake God! The people were not aware of what they had done. So the prophet, so to speak, leads them up a hill and declares: "See your way in the valley; know what you have done."

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Egypt's waters instead of their own supply

The next verse spells out where they went instead. Their appeals to Egypt and Assyria for help were not only disloyal but unnecessary.

Israel — had they known how to value it — had their own "fountain of living waters," and should never have been indebted to the streams of Egypt or of the nations around them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Broken cisterns

Earlier in the chapter God names the two evils that make up this forsaking, and one writer turns the image straight onto the reader.

"They have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters." What a lovely title, "fountain of living waters." What a wonderful thing to be in touch with the fountain of living waters. How God brings Himself before us in all the freshness of His grace and the living energy of His love. "And hewed out cisterns for themselves, broken cisterns that can hold no water" (Jer. 2:13). Broken cisterns! It does not matter whether they are big or small. The point is, if my cistern is not Christ, it is a broken cistern. Sadly, how many believers today are trying to drink at broken cisterns.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Correction aimed at return

One writer marks a word that Jeremiah uses here for the first time.

God says it plainly: "Your own wickedness will correct you, and your backslidings will rebuke you. Know and see that it is an evil and bitter thing that you have forsaken the LORD your God, and that my fear is not in you" (Jer. 2:19). This is the first place we get the word "backsliding." But the word assumes recovery — that the heart will turn back to God, because that is what the Lord wants. He longs to have us very near Him. And do our hearts not love to be near Him? But if I am away from Him, and His hand is on me, I cannot blame Him. Is the blame His? No — I know Him too well to say that.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

(In Jeremiah 2:19 the ESV renders "backsliding" as "apostasy.")

Summary

- Own doing. Israel's trouble was Israel's own harvest. God's question sends them back to the seed they sowed.

- Own guide. They left God while He was leading them. That is the sharpest edge of the charge.

- Own fountain. They had their own fountain of living waters and never needed Egypt's streams. If your cistern is not Christ, it is a broken one.

- Own correction. Their own wickedness corrected them. When His hand falls on us, He is not to blame.

- Own way back. The word for backsliding assumes a way back. The Lord wants His people near Him.

Jeremiah 2:18 · Darby

And now, what hast thou to do with the way of Egypt, to drink the waters of Shihor? And what hast thou to do with the way of Assyria, to drink the waters of the River?

God asks two questions here, and both are about a road: the road down to Egypt and the road up to Assyria. Both roads ended at a great river in a foreign empire. The question is why a nation with its own water would travel so far for a drink.

The two rivers named

Older translations name the first river "Sihor". It is the Nile, and to name it is to name the empire that owned it.

This refers to the river Nile. In Joshua 13:3 it is "Sihor which is before Egypt." In Isaiah 23:3 the river carried Egypt's harvest down to the sea, and Syrian merchants collected it there. Jeremiah 2:18 warns Israel against seeking the waters of the Nile — that is, against trusting in Egypt instead of in God.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A journey that was never needed

Israel already had water of their own. That is what makes the journey strange.

Israel had their own "fountain of living waters", if only they had known how to value it. They should never have owed anything to the streams of Egypt, or to the nations around them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Redemption forgotten

Egypt was the country God had brought them out of. So how did these two empires get back into Israel's story?

After God redeemed them, neither Egypt nor Assyria had any part in Israel's life. That changed when Israel got away from God. But their hearts, away from God, longed for evil association, and received their due reward.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The step before the journey

Nobody sets out for Egypt while God still holds first place in the heart. The travelling is the second move, not the first.

"They have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters, and hewed out cisterns for themselves, broken cisterns that can hold no water." Then He says, "I am displaced." "I do not have my place in the heart of Israel. You have put me out of my place, you have forsaken me." That is the first thing, dear friends. Do not be deceived about it in the least. You never go and hew out broken cisterns first. People never turn to the world first — they give up God first, they give up Christ first.

Modernised from W T TurpinOriginal wording

The bill from Assyria

This was not a new question. Judah had asked Assyria for help once, and the bill arrived in the next generation.

The LORD could not forget what Judah had done under Ahaz the king. Ahaz sought the help of the king of Assyria. Then, after a visit to that king, he made an altar for another god (2 Kings 16:7, 10–13). Referring to this, the Lord said to Jerusalem and Judah, "what do you gain by going to Assyria to drink the waters of the Euphrates?" … Ahaz had sent for Assyrian help, and Israel became their servants. Then the Assyrians fell upon Judah in the days of the son of Ahaz. That made Judah ashamed of those they had trusted.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What the drink cost

Israel would not settle this question by argument. They would learn the answer the hard way.

What had they to do with drinking of the Egyptian river or of the Assyrian? They must yet learn the bitterness of abandoning the LORD their God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same roads today

The two empires are gone. The habit is not, and Christians still cut cisterns of their own.

How many have to find cistern after cistern of their own cracked as they cut it, before they turn in full earnest to their own free fountain of living water! How little people understand that Christ and nothing else will more than satisfy. Christ plus a great deal else to supplement Him will only bring a person down to near starvation!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- Fountain. God calls Himself the fountain of living waters. Israel already had for free what the two empires sold at a price.

- Forsaking. The heart gives up God before the feet take the road. Nobody cuts a broken cistern while God still holds first place.

- Road. Sihor is the Nile and stands for Egypt; the Euphrates stands for Assyria. Two roads, two political alliances, one substitute for trust.

- Return. The country God rescued them from became the country they ran to for help. Redemption had cut that tie; drifting from God tied it again.

- Bitterness. Both allies failed them. The drink they travelled for taught them how bitter it is to leave the LORD — and that lesson still stands for anyone who supplements Christ with something else.

Jeremiah 2:19 · Darby

Thine own wickedness chastiseth thee, and thy backslidings reprove thee know then and see that it is an evil thing and bitter that thou hast forsaken Jehovah thy God, and that my fear is not in thee, saith the Lord, Jehovah of hosts.

Jeremiah 2 is one long appeal. God reminds Israel of the love they had at the start and asks how they came to leave Him. Verse 19 tells them where their trouble came from: they made it themselves.

The root of the ruin

The verse names one offence behind all the others: they had abandoned the Lord their God. Commentators trace the whole national collapse to one point of failure.

From the Lord's appeal to Israel through the prophet Jeremiah, we learn that the ruin of the nation in its responsibility goes back to one source — the loss of affection for the LORD with which they began their history as a people called out from the nations. The Lord tenderly reminds them of their early love by telling the prophet to go and proclaim in the hearing of Jerusalem, "Thus says the LORD, I remember the devotion of your youth, your love as a bride, how you followed me in the wilderness." That was the start of their history, but now the Lord has to say that they have forsaken the LORD their God. They were called to repent, and because they did not, judgment overtakes the nation.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Sin carrying its own sentence

The first half of the verse does not threaten an outside penalty. It says the wrongdoing itself will do the correcting.

The plagues, like many of God's judgments, are not only blows that He strikes. They show that giving in to sin pays a person back. Sin brings its own penalty.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Commentators use the same principle to explain how Midian, an enemy nation, ever came to overpower Israel.

Midian had no strength that could have prevailed unless the Lord allowed it. And He would not have allowed it if there had been no need for it in Israel's condition. Those who will not learn in close fellowship with God must learn in the hands of the enemy.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Where the drift begins

One writer takes the last clause — "the fear of me is not in you" — as the opening move of the decline, not its end.

If the heart has drifted from the Lord, then "the fear of me is not in you" (Jer. 2:19) is true of that heart. I think that is the first step away: the sense of the fear of the Lord somehow dies out in the soul, and then decline begins.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The taste of the word "bitter"

"Bitter" has a history. Its Hebrew root runs through some of the sharpest experiences in Scripture.

The root word means "to flow." From it comes the idea of the gum that flows from a tree. That gum is very bitter, so the word also names "bile" and other bitter things — the bitter water of Marah, and the water of jealousy. Naomi called herself Mara, "for the Almighty has dealt very bitterly with me." The "discontented" men who came to David at the cave of Adullam were, word for word, "bitter of soul." And the prophet declares that it is "evil and bitter" to forsake the Lord.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Israel kept running to two great powers, Egypt and Assyria, for help. Commentators tie that habit straight to the bitterness this verse names.

What had they to do with drinking of the Egyptian river or of the Assyrian? They must yet learn the bitterness of abandoning the Lord their God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

How far the principle reaches

Scripture uses this way of correcting on more than Israel alone.

When men depart from Him in any way He gives them up to something else, and unless they repent, their lusts get a stronger hold of them (see Rom. 1:18-32)… The Scripture in Romans refers to man in creature responsibility; this in Jeremiah to Israel in national responsibility; 2 Thessalonians 2:11 refers to Christendom's responsibility.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A word that expects a return

The word "backsliding" appears here for the first time in Jeremiah. One writer finds hope in the word itself.

Now here is the first time we get the word "backsliding"… It is the word that marks the early part of Jeremiah. But the word assumes recovery — that the heart will be turned back again to God, because that is what the Lord wants. He longs to have us very near Him… But if I am away from Him, and His hand is on me, I cannot blame Him. Is the blame His? Ah no, I know Him too well to say that.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Root. One thing caused the collapse. They lost their love for the Lord. It was not a long list of separate crimes.

- Fruit. God does not have to bring in a penalty from outside. The sin itself pays the sinner back. What we refuse to learn close to God, we learn in the hands of the enemy.

- Fear. When the fear of God dies out in the soul, the drift has already started. That is the first step away, not the last.

- Bitter. The same root ties this verse to the bitter water of Marah and to Naomi renaming herself. That is the taste of a life that has left God.

- Return. "Backsliding" is a word that expects a return. The hand may be heavy, but the blame is ours — and the longing to have us near is His.

Jeremiah 2:20 · Darby

For of old thou hast broken thy yoke, [and] burst thy bands; and thou saidst, I will not serve. For upon every high hill, and under every green tree, thou bowest down, playing the harlot.

God rescued His people, and they answered Him with a refusal. The verse holds three things together: a yoke God broke, a will that says no to Him, and a nation worshipping on any hill it liked.

The yoke God Himself broke

The opening words look back to a real deliverance, and to the promise Israel made once they were free. One writer traces both sides of that memory, working from an older translation which reads "you said, I will not transgress" where the ESV has "I will not serve."

"Long ago I broke your yoke and burst your bonds; and you said, I will not transgress; when on every high hill and under every green tree you wandered, playing the harlot" (Jer. 2:20). God had rescued them from Egypt, and they had promised, at Sinai, not to transgress. But the golden calf was set up before the law was even brought into the camp, and the long list of later idolatries told how they had broken the covenant. "High places" for idolatrous worship had dotted the whole land. In the shade of every green tree, Israel practised the abominations of the nations.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

No blame travels back to God. Another writer sums it up:

Long ago God set them free, and they promised obedience. But they turned to every kind of immorality. God had failed them in nothing: the fault was their own, and their stain would not wash out.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"I will not serve"

Refusing God's yoke feels like liberty. It is not:

Man throws off God's yoke and does what he takes to be his own pleasure. He supposes he is a free man. The fact is that the moment he first used his sinful will against God's will, he became the servant and dupe of Satan.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

There is a way back from that refusal, and it costs something:

We too need discipline to learn dependence. Our will is nothing other than independence. If we let it act, the Lord must break us. He does it to bring us back under His blessed yoke, which is so light and easy to bear.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Hilltops and green trees

The hilltop and the leafy grove were not random locations. They worked on the feelings of the worshipper:

Departure from God took its outward form in Israel by making for themselves "high places." It was only a heathen habit. It played on the imagination with a worship that has no heart in it. Men still try to satisfy themselves the same way — with music, architecture, drapery, and that most typical "dim religious light," in which they worship a God who is Light itself, and in whom is no darkness at all. Such things work on nature, and produce a feeling that many take for the reality it lacks. So on the mountain tops a man could imagine himself nearer to God than in the valleys. The depths of groves and forests helped too: the beauty of nature made him think he was nearer to the God of nature than he really was.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The same instinct is alive wherever people design their own approach to God:

God has provided a Centre of gathering for His people. To ignore it, and to turn to human thoughts, and to choose places and ways of worship that the word of God does not provide for — that is to worship in the high places… to go on in independence and self-will only prepares the way for wide departure from God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why God calls it harlotry

The word is strong because the bond was a marriage bond. That is what makes idolatry more than a mistake in religion:

The prophets say much about Israel's conduct as a wife, and about Jehovah's jealousy over it… Her unfaithfulness has been made plain. She has broken her vows. She has turned away from her Husband, the Holy One of Israel, and He has poured out His burning jealousy on the faithless nation. He is a jealous God, and cannot bear the thought that the heart He claims as His own should be given to another.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What He still remembers

This charge comes from a heart that remembers:

Jeremiah 2 is the first recorded word to the people. It gives the first thought which filled the heart of the Lord, the main reason for all the sorrow — those who once loved Him had forsaken Him. He could not forget the kindness of their early years when they first went after Him. He remembered the love of the days when they were promised to Him. But now He complains again and again: they have "gone far from Me"; they have "forsaken Me"; they have "turned their back to Me"; they have "forgotten Me."

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Yoke broken. God broke the bonds Himself and brought Israel out of Egypt. The freedom in this verse is His gift, not their achievement.

- Yoke refused. "I will not serve" is the will claiming independence. Throw off God's yoke and you do not become free; you become Satan's servant.

- Yoke replaced. Refusing His service did not end worship. It scattered worship to hilltops and groves, where scenery and feeling stood in for the heart God wanted.

- Yoke betrayed. The tie was a marriage tie. So unfaithfulness earns the name harlotry, and stirs a Husband's jealousy.

- Yoke restored. He still remembers the love of their early days. And the will that will not bend is broken for one purpose: to bring it back under a yoke that is light and easy to bear.

Jeremiah 2:21 · Darby

And I, -- I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed; how then art thou turned into the degenerate shoots of a strange vine unto me?

God points back to what He Himself put in the ground: a vine of the best stock, from pure seed, planted by His own hand. His question is not about His own care but about theirs. How did something so good turn wild? (The quotes below follow an older translation, which reads "a noble vine, wholly a right seed.")

No fault in the planting

The wording rules out any blame on God's side. Whatever went wrong later, the seed and the stock were right. That shapes how we speak of Israel as a vine:

It would not be right to say that Israel as the vine was false, because God had planted her. One Old Testament scripture quotes God as addressing Israel and saying, "Yet I had planted you a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then have you turned into a degenerate plant of a strange vine to Me?" As we have said, they failed, but there could be no fault in the planting.

Modernised from George BellOriginal wording

The cause of the turning

A few verses earlier God names two evils His people committed. One writer traces the lost fruit back to them:

Israel was that vine: God had brought that nation out of Egypt and planted them in the most favourable circumstances to bring forth fruit for Him. But though He had planted them wholly a right vine, they turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine to Him. The cause of their doing so we have in Jeremiah 2:13: "My people have committed two evils: they have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters, and hewed out cisterns for themselves, broken cisterns that can hold no water." First they forsook the LORD, and so of course lost all joy and happiness. Then, because they had to have something, they turned to the world to find what they had lost in forsaking the LORD. But they lost not only their own joy and happiness, they also lost their power of fruit bearing.

Modernised from J. A. TrenchOriginal wording

What the failure proved

God's question is not cold; His heart is in it. What Israel became settles a question about man at his best:

God foreknew Israel's departure and the evil that would mark the nation. He knew He would have to remove them from the land they would corrupt. Even so, it brought sorrow to His heart. God's care of Israel, and the display of His great goodness to His people, only proved that man under the very best conditions was completely beyond correction and could not bring forth fruit to please God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Set aside for a better Vine

Israel's failure did not end God's search for fruit. He gave the place to Christ, and that changed the test for anyone who claims to belong:

After centuries of cultivation and care the vine only produced "wild grapes." The noble vine planted by the Lord God of hosts had by Jeremiah's day "turned into a degenerate plant of a strange vine." So God set Israel aside, and Christ the true Vine took its place morally. He alone could bear fruit, and He did. The mark of a true disciple is not simply to be a branch in the vine — Judas was that — but to be a fruit-bearing branch.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

A pattern, not an isolated case

The verse states a rule that reaches far past Israel. God sets up each thing perfect, and decline begins once He hands it to people:

God set man up perfect in innocence, and Adam fell. The priesthood of Aaron was perfect in its kind, but there was failure in Nadab and Abihu. Whatever God has planted, He has planted wholly a right seed according to His mind. Whatever comes from God must be perfect, and no other work can improve it… God had "planted you a noble vine; how then have you turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine to Me?" The reason is simple: as soon as anything passes into man's hands, departure begins.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Measuring by the beginning

That is why God points back to the planting and not to the present ruin. His way of judging shows us how to judge:

If the first estate is not kept, there may be long patience, but there is no remedy. And when God comes in to judge, He always goes back to the first departure from the original standing. So Stephen, when speaking of the departure and sin of Israel, goes back to the golden calf, their first departure (Acts 7). We must go back to the original to judge the present state. "I planted wholly a right seed."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Planting. God chose the stock and the seed Himself; the vine failed, but there was no fault in the planting.

- Forsaking. They left the fountain of living water for broken cisterns. With the joy went the power to bear fruit.

- Proof. A people with the best conditions still bore nothing for God. That grieved His heart and showed what man is.

- Replacement. God set the failed vine aside for Christ, the true Vine. The test is not being a branch but bearing fruit.

- Return. God measures the present by the first planting. Recovery starts at the first departure, not by patching the ruin.

Jeremiah 2:22 · Darby

For though thou wash thee with nitre, and take thee much potash, thine iniquity is marked before me, saith the Lord Jehovah.

This verse cuts off a last line of defence: washing yourself clean. Older translations read "nitre" for lye and say the guilt is "marked" before God, which raises three questions — what washing is meant, why it fails, and what God gives instead.

A Reform That Never Reached the Heart

These chapters were given during a time of national reform.

Jeremiah 2 to 6. This section is an appeal to Jerusalem, with calls to repent, and warnings about what had happened to Israel. It was given in the days of Josiah, when there had been a reformation, but they had not turned to God with the whole heart.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Another writer sums up where the blame lay.

Long ago they had been set free, and they promised obedience, but they turned to every kind of immorality. God had failed in nothing: the fault was their own, and their stain would not wash out.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Lye and Soap Were

The "lye" of the verse names a real substance, not a figure of speech.

This is the natron we know today, not what is now called nitre, which is saltpetre… It is a mineral alkali, and mixed with oil it makes soap.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Hebrew verb chosen for "wash" here narrows the picture further. It is not the word for bathing a body.

"Kabas" is the last word for "wash," and its use is just as distinctive as the word we looked at before. It means to "tread," and so to wash by treading. It is used only for washing clothes and other articles, or for describing the spiritual effect of cleansing, as in Psalm 51:2, 7; Jeremiah 2:22; Jeremiah 4:14.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

So the picture is laundry: clothes trodden underfoot with alkali and soap. Even at its hardest, this work only reaches the outside.

The Outside Is the Wrong Target

One writer applies this to anyone who has drifted from God.

But it is of no use for a backslider to try and put things right outwardly. That is the next point. External washing will not do. It is the inside — the heart — that must be put right… How God knows what our hearts are!

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Self-Cleansing Exposes What It Cannot Remove

The washing reaches the clothes, but God is looking at the heart. Trying harder does not remove the stain; it brings it to light in anyone who wakes up to their own condition.

Once they wake up to some sense of their condition, they begin to try to improve themselves. They try to purify their own hearts and to make themselves fit in this way for the favour of God. But they soon discover that the only effect of all their efforts is to bring their own sin and vileness to light. Or they may succeed in weaving a robe of self-righteousness and hide their ugliness for a time. Then the moment they come into the presence of God, the robe itself appears, in the light of His holiness, as nothing but filthy rags.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The problem is not a dirty surface. It is a condition no effort can improve.

Nothing could be more opposed to the basic truth of the gospel than the theory that the sinner's condition improves bit by bit. He is born in a certain condition, and until he is "born again" he cannot be in any other. We may try to improve. He may resolve to be better in future — to "turn over a new leaf," to live a different kind of life. But all the while he has not moved a hair's breadth out of his real condition as a sinner.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The One Cleansing That Works

The verse closes one door and opens another. What lye and soap cannot touch, God has provided for.

The blood is the only means of cleansing from guilt. This is the way God appointed and God gave. It therefore shuts out every other method… It is only the blood of Christ that can make the sinner whiter than snow.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

People still try to add something of their own to it.

It is the blood by itself alone that has this power. There can be no addition to it. It is not the blood and something else. Add to it in any way — by feelings, prayers, or sorrow for sin (all of which have their proper place) — and you spoil its cleansing power.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- The stain. The reform in Josiah's day changed the surface but never reached the heart. God's verdict: the fault was theirs, and the stain would not wash out.

- The scrubbing. The words picture laundry: natron and soap, clothes washed by treading. It is hard work, and all of it on the outside.

- The exposure. Self-improvement cannot remove the stain. It only brings sin to light, and a robe of self-righteousness turns out to be filthy rags before God.

- The impossibility. No one can improve his condition bit by bit. He stays where he was born until he is born again.

- The blood. Only the blood of Christ cleanses what no washing can reach. Add anything to it and you spoil its power.

Jeremiah 2:23 · Darby

How sayest thou, I am not defiled, I have not gone after the Baals? See thy way in the valley, acknowledge what thou hast done -- a swift dromedary traversing her ways!

God accuses Judah of idolatry, and she flatly denies it. He does not argue the charge; He tells her to look down into the valley and read her own tracks.

A denial against the record

The denial comes right after God says the stain of guilt cannot be removed. One writer sets the record and the denial side by side.

They had broken the covenant and acted like an unfaithful wife. The fine vine He had planted had gone bad. Their guilt stood on record before the Lord, and nothing they did could remove the stain (verse 22). Yet they denied that they had gone after idols.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A conscience out of use

One writer traces confidence like that back to a conscience that is never used. He also says what keeps a person low.

Self-confidence and self-exaltation, in every form, always come from a conscience that is never exercised. Just put a man in the Lord's presence: that will keep him humble, and able to discern spiritually. But there is nothing we lose more easily than the sense that God is present.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same writer shows what God is doing when He makes a person face the truth.

When the conscience is awakened and the heart is engaged, we come to rest in the presence of God. Whenever the Lord calls a soul back, He calls it back to His own presence. He will work on the conscience; He will speak plainly to us. So every rebuke comes to us as the expression of the most wonderful tenderness.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The road already travelled

God's reply is not a lecture but a viewpoint. One writer pictures the prophet taking the people up to where they can see the track they have left.

The people did not realise what they had done. So the prophet, in a sense, takes them up to a hilltop and says: "Look at your way in the valley; know what you have done — a restless young camel running here and there" (v.23).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The same writer turns those questions on us.

Should we not also look back at every stage of our lives and consider the path already covered? What kind of footsteps have we left behind us? Have we followed the Lord without turning aside, or have we wandered about, seeking our own interest and not the Lord's?

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

What the Baals were

The name she denies chasing means "Lords." One writer shows that idolatry keeps an element of the truth about God and swaps the rest for something human.

We are told that the people served the Baals. The name means "Lords." God's Lordship and ownership is a truth: God does own mankind. He is God over them. But how many gods and lords men have set over themselves! Each one holds some element of divine truth, but only an element. What is it to leave God and serve the Baals? It is to set aside a single attribute of God and put some human attribute in its place.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The picture of the running camel

The verse ends with a picture of an animal. Older translations call it a swift dromedary. A Bible dictionary explains the word.

The dromedary is really the same animal as the camel. The name is given to those of a lighter and more valuable breed. People use them for the same purposes as the camel.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Saying "I have not sinned" today

The same denial can be heard today. One writer applies it to believers caught up in what is wrong.

When believers are caught up in evil principles and practices, saying either "There is no hope" or "I have not sinned" (Jer. 2) shows in both cases the evil heart of unbelief. The Word of God condemns such words; it does not justify them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Denial. Their guilt stood on record before the Lord, and nothing they did could remove the stain — yet they denied ever going after idols.

- Diagnosis. Confidence like that comes from a conscience out of use. Living in the Lord's presence is what keeps a person humble.

- Evidence. God answers the denial with the road already travelled: look at your way in the valley, and know what you have done.

- Exchange. To serve the Baals — "Lords" — is to set aside one attribute of God and put a human one in its place.

- Application. Look back at the footsteps you have left. Never let "I have not sinned" pass your lips: God's Word condemns those words, it does not justify them.

Jeremiah 2:24 · Darby

-- a wild ass, used to the wilderness, that snuffeth up the wind in her desire! In her ardour, who shall turn her away? All they that seek her will not weary themselves; in her month they shall find her.

Jeremiah 2 is God's long complaint against people who had forgotten and forsaken Him. In verse 24 He reaches for a picture from the desert: a wild donkey that nobody owns, nobody drives, and nobody can call back.

The tone of the chapter

The charge is severe, but it is not a sentence handed down. God is still reasoning with people He has not stopped loving.

Chapters 1 to 24 of Jeremiah are full of the Lord's pleading — His gracious pleading — with His people. They were rebellious, backsliding and guilty, but still beloved. Judah's moral state at the time of the prophecy was deplorable. Every class shared the guilt of forgetting and forsaking the Lord: kings and subjects, high and low, rich and poor, pastors and people, prophets and priests. All alike had fallen, and all were guilty.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why a wild donkey

Anyone who had seen this animal would catch the comparison at once.

The wild donkey is very wild and very swift. It is seldom tamed. It is a fitting picture of man's natural birth. Job 11:12. The Lord demanded of Job, "Who has let the wild donkey go free? Who has loosed the bonds of the swift donkey?" Job 39:5; compare Jeremiah 7:24; Daniel 5:21.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The point is not her speed. No one can handle her, and God says His people have become that. Her craving drives her; she catches the scent on the wind, and nothing turns her back. Yet the same craving leaves her exposed — anyone who wants her can find her without effort when her season comes.

The verdict on these verses

Verse 24 stands inside a short run of verses, 23 to 25. Read together, they describe what these people had become:

They were self-righteous, yet quick to do evil and beyond reclaiming, hopelessly given over to others (verses 23-25). Their guilt was as plain as a thief caught in the act.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Washing the outside

Just before the wild donkey, God had spoken about soap. The two pictures belong together.

But it is no use for a backslider to try to put things right on the outside. That is the next point. External washing will not do. It is the inside — the heart — that must be put right. "Though you wash yourself with lye and use much soap, the stain of your guilt is still before me, declares the Lord GOD" (Jeremiah 2:22). Then He turns to show that they were like the wild donkey (Jeremiah 2:24). Like the thief who is caught (Jeremiah 2:26), they were ashamed, because they had fallen into outright idolatry.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The trail behind us

A wandering animal leaves tracks behind it. So does a life.

Should we not also look back at every stage of our lives and consider the path already covered? What kind of footsteps have we left behind us? Have we followed the Lord without turning aside, or have we wandered about, seeking our own interest and not the Lord's?

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The word that still holds out hope

One word enters Jeremiah for the first time in this chapter, and it carries a promise inside it.

Here is the first time we get the word "backsliding." It is the characteristic word in the early part of Jeremiah. But it assumes recovery — that the heart will turn back again to God, because that is what the Lord wants. He longs to have us very near Him.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Pleading. God draws this harsh picture while still pleading with people He calls beloved. The guilt ran through every class, from kings to priests to ordinary people.

- Picture. The wild donkey is swift and almost never tamed. It pictures human nature as it is born.

- Verdict. The surrounding verses name the state: self-righteous, quick to do evil, beyond reclaiming. Their guilt was as plain as a thief caught in the act.

- Depth. Soap does not touch it. The problem is not the surface but the heart, so outward reform leaves the stain where it was.

- Recovery. The key word here, "backsliding", assumes a way back. God says all this to bring the wanderer near Him again.

Jeremiah 2:25 · Darby

Withhold thy foot from being unshod, and thy throat from thirst. But thou saidst, There is no hope; no, for I love strangers, and after them will I go.

God asks His people to stop before they wear themselves out chasing gods that cannot save them. Their answer is a flat refusal: the case is closed, and they will keep running.

The picture behind "unshod"

One commentator reads the picture of bare feet, then follows the chase to where it ends:

The Lord tells them, "keep your feet from going unshod." He means this: stop running after strange gods so hard that the sandals wear out and the feet go bare. They boldly declared, "It is hopeless, for I have loved foreigners, and after them I will go." They had turned both their backs and their faces away from the Lord. But when the time of trouble comes, they will say, "Arise, save us." But could those false gods they had made respond and save them? Would they? Some day a remnant of that nation will turn to the Lord and cry, "Arise, save us," and He will answer.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"It is hopeless" — the word of a heart without faith

This answer is not indifference. One writer sets it against the cry faith makes when God's people suffer:

Affliction sometimes weighs heavily on the people of God. They are not enjoying all the privileges that faith knows belong to them. In that state faith says, "How long, O Lord!"… So we often meet such expressions in the Psalms and Prophets, like "How long, O Lord!" and "There is none to say, How long!" — there is no one who knows how to count on the faithfulness of God. When under chastening, if there is no faith to use this expression, a worse one takes its place: "I have loved foreigners, and after them I will go." Then the people abandon themselves to wickedness.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The love they traded away

God answers their choice with a memory. He recalls the desert years, and what He was to them there:

"You went after Me in the wilderness, in a land of deserts and pits, in a land of drought and deep darkness, in a land that none passes through, where no man dwells." You went after Me where there was nothing to set your affections on but Myself. I Myself was the whole and sole object of your affections. This is what God remembered. He overlooks all failure, and the condition He notices is that He Himself was everything to them. This is what marks a heart when it is first converted to God — the Lord is everything to it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer sets Israel's words next to what the Lord later said to a church:

The Lord lamented concerning Israel, "I remember the devotion of your youth, your love as a bride, how you followed Me in the wilderness, in a land not sown"… "But you said, 'It is hopeless, for I have loved foreigners, and after them I will go.'" In Revelation 2 we hear the Lord's rebuke to Ephesus: "I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first." Works were there. Sound doctrine and church order were there too. But the decay of love spread its dismal blight over them all.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Where the refusal begins

No one begins by saying the case is hopeless. One writer traces the first step back to an earlier verse in this chapter:

If the heart has departed from the Lord, then "the fear of Me is not in you" (Jer. 2:19) is true of that heart. I think that is the first step away. The sense of the fear of the Lord somehow dies out in the soul, and then the decline begins.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The reply God gives to "hopeless"

The people close the door; God does not. One writer sends anyone who has said such a thing to the chapters that follow:

Perhaps there may be one here who is a backslider… Read Jeremiah 2 – 4 before you go to bed tonight, and you will see what He does. Israel forgot Him, but He never forgot Israel. "Ah," you may say, "it is many a month since I thought much of Him, and many a bitter thing has happened since then." Yes, and He knows all about it. When you come to Jeremiah 4 you will see that the heart is recovered through perfect grace.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Plea — God warns first: stop before the sandals wear out and the throat goes dry. These gods cannot save.

- Refusal — "It is hopeless" is despair turned into a plan. Faith would have cried, "How long, O Lord!" This heart runs after strangers instead.

- Root — the turning away starts long before the words, when the fear of the Lord dies out in the soul.

- Loss — they traded away the wilderness love, when God Himself was their whole affection. A church later heard the same complaint.

- Answer — the people say there is no hope; God says otherwise. Israel forgot Him, but He never forgot Israel. The chapters that follow show grace recovering the heart.

Jeremiah 2:26 · Darby

As a thief is ashamed when he is found, so shall the house of Israel be ashamed -- they, their kings, their princes, and their priests, and their prophets --

The Lord spends this whole chapter pleading with a people who had left Him, and here He compares them to a thief caught in the act. The question is not whether Israel was guilty, but why being caught left them embarrassed and unchanged.

Caught in the act

The picture of a thief is not about how the nation felt. It is about how obvious the crime had become — and it reaches from the crowds up to the throne:

They were self-righteous, yet swift to do evil and beyond recovery. They were given up hopelessly to others, and were as plainly guilty as a thief caught in the act. And this was true not of the masses only, but of their kings, their leaders, their priests, and their prophets. They said to a tree, "You are my father," and to a stone, "You gave me birth."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Every rank in the guilt

The verse names four classes, not one. Nobody could point the finger at anyone else. The failure ran through every level of society at once:

The moral state and condition of Judah at the time of the prophecy were deplorable. Every class shared the guilt of forgetting and forsaking the Lord — kings and subjects, high and low, rich and poor, pastors and people, prophets and priests. All alike had fallen and were guilty.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The pattern from the top

The verse names kings first, and the history behind the chapter explains why:

Amon, his successor, walked in all the ways his father walked in, and served the idols his father served. Priests, prophets, and people followed these kings. We find Jeremiah complaining: "The priests did not say, 'Where is the Lord?' … The shepherds also transgressed against Me, and the prophets prophesied by Baal. The house of Israel shall be shamed: they, their kings, their officials, their prophets, saying to a tree, 'You are my father,' and to a stone, 'You gave me birth'" (Jer. 2:8, 26).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Those who were meant to feed the people are the very ones the Lord holds answerable for scattering them:

The Lord says, "My people have been like lost sheep, and their shepherds have caused them to go astray" (Jer. 50:6). God pronounces woe on these selfish shepherds who scatter the flock (Jer. 23:1-2).

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Shame versus repentance

A thief is not sorry he stole. He is sorry someone caught him. One writer draws the line between that feeling and real repentance:

But do not mistake this for repentance. Shame merely drives them to hide from God and to excuse themselves to Him. And so with us. As long as the shame of sin lasts, we try to hide it and get away from it. But it only drives us farther and farther from God. This is not a conscience taught by God. We are more concerned about the shame before men than about the sinfulness before God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

There is a horror at sin that still is not self-judgment:

Some sins are so shocking that a man who falls into them is shocked at himself. But this is not self-judgment about those sins, either before God or man. It is only disgust and surprise that they have overtaken him.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

No outward fix

The chapter moves on from the caught thief to the idols the people had made, and asks what they are worth in trouble:

It is no use for a backslider to try to put things right outwardly. That is the next point. External washing will not do. It is the inside — the heart — that must be put right… like the "thief found out" (Jer. 2:26) they were "ashamed" because they had fallen into downright idolatry (Jer. 2:27). How well God knows what our hearts are! … The Lord tells us, "In the time of their trouble they will say, 'Arise and save us'" (Jer. 2:27). Well may He reply, "But where are your gods that you made for yourself? Let them arise, if they can save you in your time of trouble" (Jer. 2:28). Let the thing you have been occupied with deliver you. That cannot be.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Caught — God does not argue the nation's guilt. He exposes it, as plain as a thief caught in the act.

- Counted — The shame reaches every rank listed: kings, officials, priests, prophets. High and low, all were alike fallen and guilty.

- Caused — The kings led the way into idol worship, and priests, prophets, and people followed. Shepherds who should have fed the flock made it stray.

- Confused — Shame at getting caught is not repentance. It hides, excuses, and drives a person farther from God, because it minds the shame before people more than the sin before God.

- Cured — Washing the outside reaches nothing. The heart itself must change, and the idols cannot save when God calls on them to try.

Jeremiah 2:27 · Darby

saying to a stock, Thou art my father; and to a stone, Thou hast brought me forth; for they have turned the back unto me, and not the face; and in the time of their trouble they will say, Arise, and save us!

Judah called dead wood its father and a stone its source of life, and turned its back on the God who made the nation. Yet when trouble came, the same people still called on Him to rise and rescue them.

The thing they called father

Older translations read "stock" where the ESV has "tree" — a shaped piece of dead wood. One writer puts the problem plainly:

A lifeless stock that man forms cannot be, or duly represent, the God who made him and all things.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer links a god of one's own making to unchecked desire, and to corrupt religion:

People turn away from God as He shows Himself to us in Christ. They make a god of their own imagination and give free vent to the lusts of their own hearts. That is why there is so much corruption in the name of religion.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Not the crowd only, but the leaders

The false worship went to the top of the nation:

They were as obvious as a thief caught in the act. And this was not the masses only, but their kings, their leaders, their priests, and their prophets, saying to a stock, "You are my father," and to a stone, "You have brought me forth." In their trouble they might turn to God with "Arise and save us"; but God challenges their gods to arise if they can save them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

This did not start with Jeremiah's generation. One writer traces it back to Judah's earlier kings, and to priests who never asked where the Lord was:

King Amon walked in all the ways his father walked in, and served the idols his father served. Priests, prophets, and people followed these kings. Jeremiah complains: "The priests did not say, 'Where is the Lord?' … The shepherds transgressed against me, the prophets prophesied by Baal" (Jer. 2:8).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The back, and not the face

Turning the back is one of several complaints in this chapter. One writer hears the Lord's own hurt love behind them:

Jeremiah 2 is the first recorded word to the people. It gives the first thought that filled the heart of the Lord, the main reason for all the sorrow: those who once loved Him had forsaken Him. He could not forget the kindness of their early years when they first went after Him. He remembered the love of their engagement days. But now He complains again and again: they have "gone far from Me"; they have "forsaken Me"; they have "turned their back to Me"; they have "forgotten Me" (see vv. 2, 5, 13, 17, 19, 27, and 32).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

"Arise and save us" — a prayer from panic

One writer applies the last line to anyone who has drifted from God and hopes an outward fix will settle it:

It is no use for a backslider to try to put things right outwardly. That is the next point. Washing the outside will not do. It is the inside — the heart — that must be put right… How God knows what our hearts are! If we get ever so far away from the Lord, and trouble and sorrow come, what should we do? The Lord tells us, "In the time of their trouble they say, 'Arise and save us!'" He may well reply, "But where are your gods that you made for yourself? Let them arise, if they can save you, in your time of trouble." Let the thing you have been occupied with deliver you. That cannot be.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A cry produced by pain is not the same as repentance, and the difference shows in what happens afterwards:

When Israel sinned, and cried out in their distress, "We have sinned," there was no true self-judgment. They mourned their misery, not their sin. So after every deliverance they sinned again, and worse than before.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same words, one day answered

One writer looks ahead to a day when the same cry gets an answer:

They had turned both their backs and their faces away from the Lord. But when the time of trouble comes, they will say, "Arise, save us." But could or would the false gods they had made respond and save them? Some day a remnant of that nation will turn to the Lord and cry, "Arise, save us," and He will answer.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Substitute — They called a dead piece of wood their father. But what a man shapes cannot be, or stand in for, the God who made him.

- Spread — The guilt was not the crowd's alone. Kings, officials, priests and prophets all spoke this way, following the idol-serving kings before them.

- Back — Turning the back to God is one of this chapter's repeated complaints. The Lord who makes it still remembers the love of their early days.

- Cry — Trouble can produce loud prayer without a changed heart; God's reply is to send them to the gods they made. Mourning your misery is not mourning your sin.

- Face — The words themselves are not the problem. A day comes when a remnant turns the face back to the Lord, cries "Arise, save us," and He answers.

Jeremiah 2:28 · Darby

Where then are thy gods that thou hast made for thyself? let them arise, if they can save thee in the time of thy trouble for as the number of thy cities, are thy gods, O Judah.

Judah had filled its land with gods of its own making. Then disaster came, and the people called on the LORD to get up and rescue them. God's reply is not a lecture but a question: go and ask the gods you made, and see whether they answer.

The challenge God throws back

The verse is a reply. The people had just cried for rescue. God tells them to take that cry to the gods they had been serving. One writer shows why the challenge cuts so deep — God is dealing with the heart, not the surface:

It is no use for someone who has wandered from God to try and put things right on the outside. Outward washing will not do. It is the inside — the heart — that must be put right. How God knows what our hearts are! If we get ever so far away from the Lord, should trouble and sorrow come, what should we do? The Lord tells us, "In the time of their trouble they will say, Arise, and save us" (Jer. 2:27). Well may He reply, "But where are your gods that you made for yourself? Let them arise, if they can save you, in your time of trouble" (Jer. 2:28). Let the thing that you have been occupied with deliver you. That cannot be.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

No shortage of gods

The second half of the verse counts the gods and matches them against the towns. God is not complaining that Judah lacked religious options.

In their trouble they might turn to God with "Arise and save us"; but God challenges their gods to arise if they can save them. It was from no lack of number, sadly! For Judah's gods were as many as their cities.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The scale of the idolatry

That count of gods was not poetic exaggeration. A later king, Josiah, set out to clear the idols away. One writer weighs what that job took:

Read the long list of the detestable things he destroyed and abolished (2 Kings 23:4-20). Notice too that it took him six years to cleanse the land and the house. Anyone who does that cannot fail to form at least some faint idea of the terrible scale of Judah's idolatry during the reigns of that king's two immediate predecessors (Jer. 2:28).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Words borrowed from Moses

Jeremiah's taunt is not new wording. One writer traces it back into the books of Moses:

These chapters also contain references and quotations which identify the law with the five books of Moses as we now have them. In verse 28 the prophet says, "Where are your gods that you made for yourself? Let them arise, if they can save you, in your time of trouble," clearly a quotation of Deut. 32:37-38.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Made gods and the Maker

God's challenge turns on one detail: these gods were made. Writing on a similar passage, one writer sets the made idol beside the God who makes:

In contrast to these helpless idols that have to be carried, the house of Israel is reminded that Jehovah carries the remnant of Israel. He made His people, carries them, and will deliver them from all their enemies. Idols are contrasted with Jehovah here, but cannot for a moment be compared with the true God. Jehovah is the Maker, but an idol has to be made. Once made, instead of carrying others it has to be carried. Set in its place, it cannot move, cannot answer the cry of need, and cannot save from trouble.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The same question, asked of us

The verse is not only an ancient scene. One writer names what an idol looks like now:

And let us remember that the same tendency is at work with us today. That is why the first letter of John ends with the words, "keep yourselves from idols." For us an idol is anything that traps us. It takes over in our hearts the place that belongs to God alone.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Made — the gods in this verse were things Judah itself manufactured. Jehovah is the Maker; an idol has to be made.

- Multiplied — one god per city, and it still added up to nothing. Quantity never made up for the absence of the living God.

- Mute — an idol has to be carried, cannot move, cannot answer a cry, cannot save from trouble. Its silence is the whole point of God's challenge.

- Measured — the clean-up shows the depth: a later king needed six years to cleanse the land and the temple.

- Modern — an idol is anything that traps the heart and takes the place God alone should hold. In real trouble it will answer as Judah's gods did.

Jeremiah 2:29 · Darby

Wherefore would ye contend with me? Ye all have transgressed against me, saith Jehovah.

Through this whole chapter God pleads with Judah, and Judah answers back as if the wrong were His. So He asks why they argue with Him at all, when not one of them has kept faith.

The Setting: A God Who Pleads

One writer catches the tone of the chapters this verse sits in:

Jeremiah 1 to 24 is full of the pleadings, the gracious pleadings, of Jehovah with His people. They were rebellious, backsliding and guilty, but still beloved.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

So this question comes from a God still pleading.

No Wrong Found in God

Before God asks why they argue with Him, He had already given them their chance to state a case. Earlier in the chapter He puts Himself on trial:

The complaint starts with a moving question. "What wrong did your fathers find in Me, that they went far from Me, and went after worthlessness, and became worthless?" Was there anything unrighteous in Him? Had He acted treacherously? Was it Jehovah's fault that they had left Him? They had not thought about His faithfulness. He led them out of Egypt, through the desert and the shadows of death... So Jehovah states His case, to plead with them and with their children.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

They could name no wrong in Him. Yet they still argued.

"You Have All Transgressed" — No Exceptions

The charge reaches every level of the nation:

They were self-righteous, yet quick to do evil and beyond recovery. They were given over to others with no hope, and as clearly guilty as a thief caught in the act. And this was not only the crowds, but their kings, their leaders, their priests and their prophets, saying to a block of wood, "You are my father," and to a stone, "You gave me birth"... Their excuses were useless. They were all guilty. Far from accepting Jehovah's correction, their own sword had devoured their prophets.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

In them, self-righteousness and guilt stood together. Another writer weighs their guilt against the nations around them, and then against us:

Their folly and ingratitude were worse than that of the nations who did not know Him. Such was the failure of the nation God had favoured. The failure of the Christian world is even greater, when we think of the greater showing of God's love in the gift of His Son, and the greater blessing and deliverance.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Argument Every Sinner Still Makes

One writer turns the same argument on every reader. Either we are at fault, or God is:

Who is at fault? How empty it is to think God is! How impossible to find anything but perfection in the Holy One! Think that, and you will silence all the harps of heaven, darken its blessed light, and bring disaster and ruin everywhere. There is no danger: He will be justified in His words, and will win when He is judged. But it is an old argument, and a common one: "Will you even put aside My judgment? Will you condemn Me so that you may be righteous?" We must do that, or else submit to God's judgment on ourselves. For it is written about us, "None is righteous, no, not one," and "whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God."

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Excuses God Does Not Answer

God passes over some pleas without a word. The first excuses people ever made got no reply:

When Eve pleaded the serpent's trickery, and Adam pleaded the woman's gift to him, the Lord God did not stoop to answer their pleas. And who of us today does not declare Him right in passing that sentence without answering those excuses?

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Plea God Accepts

There is one kind of pleading God accepts, and it runs the other way. On a similar invitation in Isaiah, one commentator writes:

Before God can righteously remember their sins no more, He must be put in remembrance. In other words, Israel must confess their sins in full before God can justify them. So Jehovah has to say, "Put Me in remembrance; let us argue together; set forth your case, that you may be proved right." Let Israel go back to their "first father" and confess their sin and rebellion against Jehovah... When Israel confesses their sin like this and justifies God in His dealings with them, God will justify Israel. He will blot out their transgressions and remember their sin no more.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Contend with God and you lose. Agree with Him and He clears you.

Summary

- Pleading, not sentencing. In these chapters God pleads with a rebellious and guilty people He still loves.

- No fault in Him. He asks what wrong they ever found in Him. No charge sticks, so their arguing has no ground.

- All means all. Kings, leaders, priests, prophets and crowds were all guilty. Their excuses were useless.

- Two verdicts only. Either we condemn God to keep ourselves right, or we stop our mouths and own our guilt before Him.

- Change your plea. Confess your sin and say God is right. Then He justifies you, blots out your transgressions and remembers your sin no more.

Jeremiah 2:30 · Darby

In vain have I smitten your children they received no correction. Your own sword hath devoured your prophets, like a destroying lion.

God lists what He has already tried on Judah: blows that changed nothing, and messengers the people killed. This verse raises a hard question — what is left when correction itself stops working?

The Verse in Its Setting

This line closes a long charge against Judah in Jeremiah 2. One writer sums up the end of the chapter, where idolatry, refused correction and dead prophets stand together.

In their trouble they might turn to God with "Arise and save us." But God challenges their gods to arise, if they can save them. Sadly, it was not for lack of numbers — Judah's gods were as many as their cities. They excused themselves in vain. They were all guilty. Far from accepting the Lord's correction, their own sword had devoured their prophets.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Refusing Correction Claims

Refusing correction is not a neutral act. It says something about how you rate yourself. That spirit filled Jerusalem before it fell, and it turned up later in a church that felt rich.

Scriptures such as Jeremiah 2:30, Jeremiah 6:3, Jeremiah 7:28 and Zephaniah 3:2 show a similar spirit among the people in Jerusalem, just before Nebuchadnezzar destroyed it. Those who refuse "correction" thereby claim to be all they should be… The same thing meets us in Revelation 3. Laodicea is so rich that it has need of nothing, and therefore no need of correction.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Why the Blows Changed Nothing

The verse says God struck "in vain." One writer argues that this is the rule, not the exception, and points to Pharaoh as proof.

We go further and say this: at no time do we find that God's dealings in judgment produce reformation. In Egypt God dealt with Pharaoh, increasing the severity of His strokes. Was his heart softened? No, it was hardened.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

What Follows When Strokes Fail

Isaiah and Jeremiah describe the same wasted stroke elsewhere. They also name what it led to: the sword of an invading army.

Isaiah says, "Why will you still be struck down? Why will you continue to rebel?" Of the generation in his day, Jeremiah had to say, "You have struck them down, but they felt no anguish." And again, "I have paid attention and listened, but they have not spoken rightly; no man relents of his evil, saying, 'What have I done?'" Are we then to wonder that the sword of the Chaldean entered the land?

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Why They Killed the Prophets

The verse blames the people's own sword, not a foreign army, and compares it to a lion tearing its prey. The reason lies in the prophet's job.

The prophets dealt with the people's sin, exposing it without fear in the light of truth, righteousness, and God's judgment… They held the light of God against the wicked will of man, and that light condemned it. This is what drew out the hostility of Israel. It made the prophet a man dishonoured and opposed, nowhere so much as in his own country. Jeremiah was not one bit behind the rest in the bitter contempt and open persecution he had to bear from priests, prophets, and princes. He gives plain testimony to God's sending on the one hand, and to Israel's rebellion on the other.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Pattern Carried to Its End

Jeremiah's generation was not the last to do this. God kept sending messengers, and the people kept refusing them. At last He had only His Son to send.

He sent prophets not only to reprove but to win Israel back in an extraordinary way. But they took His servants, beat one, killed another, stoned a third. He sent others, more than the first; but they persisted instead of repenting, and did even worse. He still had one beloved Son, so He sent Him to them last of all, saying, "They will respect my Son." But they said to one another, "This is the heir. Come, let us kill him, and the inheritance will be ours."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Correction Is For

God's discipline has a goal, and it calls for a response. One writer sets out both, and adds what happens if you run from it.

When the hearts of His people turn away from Him God may have to act in discipline. The goal of discipline is to restore, correct and bring about repentance. The correct reaction to God's discipline is to accept it. That does not mean being indifferent. It means learning the lesson God wants to teach. Running away from discipline will only make it worse. Bowing under God's discipline brings blessing… Even in discipline God shows grace.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Correction sent. The blows on Judah's children were discipline, not destruction. God's aim in discipline is to restore, correct and bring about repentance.

- Correction refused. To refuse correction is to claim you are already all you should be. Laodicea said the same thing by feeling rich.

- Correction wasted. Blows alone never reform anyone. Pharaoh's heart hardened under increasing strokes, and Judah felt no anguish under God's.

- Messengers killed. The prophets held God's light against man's will. That is why the people's own sword devoured them.

- The Son last. The same refusal ran on from beaten servants to the murdered Son. That road starts with one ignored correction.

Jeremiah 2:31 · Darby

O generation, mark ye the word of Jehovah. Have I been a wilderness unto Israel, or a land of thick darkness? Wherefore say my people, We have dominion; we will come no more unto thee?

In this chapter God charges His people with leaving Him. Now He turns from charge to question, and asks them to name one barren thing in Himself — or admit that the barrenness lay somewhere else.

God Stoops to Ask

One writer sets God's question beside the flat refusal that met it.

Yet with what condescension and consideration He asks them, "Have I been a wilderness to Israel, or a land of thick darkness?" But it was no use; they were shameless and idolatrous. Pastors, prophets and people went after Baal; the priests did not say, "Where is the Lord?" He had chastised them in vain; they took no correction.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

What "A Wilderness" Means

A wilderness grows nothing. One writer widens the question from God's land to heavenly things.

Nothing could be more touching than God's next question here, "Have I been a wilderness to Israel?" Was I barren? Was there barrenness in My land? Is there barrenness in heavenly things? What a striking expression for God to use to His people! But that is what it is. If the heart loses the sense of grace, it loses its delight in Christ.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Desert Was the Proof

The word "wilderness" carries a history: Israel had crossed a real desert.

When did the Lord bring up His people? It was when the circumstances He led them through, and into, proved that the Lord was the one bringing them there. He brought them into a land of deserts and pits. There they had no need to lean on a broken reed, because they leaned on God Himself. A broken reed pierces the hand of the man who leans on it. "Your clothing did not wear out on you and your foot did not swell these forty years." And why? Because "the LORD alone guided him, no foreign god was with him."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"We Will Come No More To You"

The second half of the verse claims independence; older translations render "We are free" as "We have dominion." One writer traces that claim down to the root of all sin.

The root of all sin is not in the desires where it shows itself so hatefully. It is in having a will of our own. It is the will leaving God — the will to be independent, free to do our own will: "Who is Lord over us?" When we separate from God like this, we must have something. We cannot be enough for ourselves, and we sink into desires in which our will works.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Everyone Was In It

The verse addresses a whole generation. One writer shows how the failure spread from the leaders to everyone, and what followed.

We have seen what is said about the kings, prophets, priests, and pastors. Now we shall see that the people become like their princes. Like master, like man… They had not only forsaken and forgotten the Lord, though they still named His holy name; they had become idolatrous. The Lord pleads with them, but they would not hear… Jerusalem, the princes and the people, would therefore become "a desolation, an astonishment, a hissing, and a curse." And He carried out His word with startling exactness.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Where the Real Desert Is

If God is not the wilderness, something else is. One writer answers God's question for himself.

This is a wilderness, and we need something like it to drive us to Him who has said, "Have I been a wilderness to Israel, or a land of thick darkness?" To me He has not been so, and is not in Himself.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Summary

- The question. God asks His people to name one barren thing in Himself — one thing that would justify leaving Him.

- The history. The desert years already answered it. Their clothes did not wear out, their feet did not swell, and no foreign god was with them.

- The root. Behind "we will come no more to you" is the will to be independent. That will cannot feed itself, so it sinks into other desires.

- The spread. Priests, prophets, pastors and people all stopped asking, "Where is the Lord?" The judgment God had warned of then fell just as He said.

- The turn. The barrenness was never in Him. The world is the wilderness, and its emptiness is meant to drive us back to Him.

Jeremiah 2:32 · Darby

Doth a virgin forget her ornaments, a bride her attire? But my people have forgotten me days without number.

In Jeremiah 2 God appeals to a nation He once called His bride. Here He points to something obvious: a young woman does not forget her jewelry, and a bride does not forget her wedding dress. What does it say about a people, then, when God is the one thing that slips their mind?

A Question That Answers Itself

God asks what He had done to deserve this. The jewels in the picture were His own gift.

Verses 31-37. Israel's conduct was beyond understanding. Once more it is the "Why" of Jehovah. What had He done that they should turn away from Him? Can a virgin forget her ornaments, or a bride her attire? Yet His people had forgotten Him, who had loved and adorned them, days without number. He will plead with them because they said, I have not sinned.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Forgetting Against Nature

The appeal ends with a question: had God ever been a desert to His people? Their forgetting was not one slip, and it went against nature.

The prophet closes this appeal on the Lord's part by asking if He had been a desert or a land of darkness to Israel, that they came no more to Him. They forgot Him unnaturally and continually. They taught the wicked their ways. And with the most obvious blood-guiltiness, they still pretended to innocence.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What He Had Been Doing All Those Days

"Days without number" measures their neglect. It also measures something on God's side over the very same days.

Then He adds, "Can a virgin forget her ornaments, or a bride her attire? Yet my people have forgotten me days without number" (Jer. 2:32). What had He done every day? Watched over and cared for them. Yes, blessed be His name, He had continually thought of them. We have forgotten Him, perhaps, but He has never forgotten us. We are engraved on the very palms of His hands, and the one thing He has in mind is to have the backsliders brought back.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Love May Fail Where Faith Does Not

Peter loved his Master and still denied Him. His failure shows that this can happen to real believers, and Isaiah answers it with a promise.

Peter, in self-confidence, yet with real love to his Master, promised he would face prison and death for his beloved Lord. Then, at the voice of a servant girl, he denied his Master with oaths and cursing! Peter sinned, but his faith did not fail (Luke 22:31-34, 54-62). It is so with each one of us. Even in the darkest season of fiercest temptation, those who have the weakest faith always cling to Christ, the Son of the living God (1 Peter 1:4-7). Yet the lips may cruelly deny that they know Him! "Peter was following at a distance." "My people have forgotten me days without number." Jer. 2:32. "Yet I will not forget you." Isa. 49:15.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The Grief Behind the Words

This is not cold accusation. One writer hears the same grief in the words to the assembly at Ephesus, spoken over a love that had cooled.

The true heart is not indifferent to this departure from the truth. He surely feels it keenly, like the blessed Lord Himself. Touchingly we find Him saying to the assembly at Ephesus: "I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first" (Rev. 2:4). And to Israel also: "I remember the devotion of your youth, your love as a bride" (Jer. 2:2). He continues: "They have forsaken Me, the fountain of living waters" (v. 13); "My people have forgotten Me days without number" (v. 32). How all this shows us what the heart of the Lord feels about the ungrateful behaviour of those who profess His name.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A Test You Can Apply Today

Whether this verse fits us shows up in ordinary talk, not in dramatic sin.

Suppose the Lord crossed our path today and asked, "What are you talking about?" Would He find us talking about Him, His interests, and His things? It is very good for us if He would. But if not, we shall simply have to admit how true was the word of the Lord, "My people have forgotten me days without number" (Jer. 2:32). Blessed be His name, He has never forgotten us.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Adorned. The jewels and the bridal dress were His gift. He "had loved and adorned them" — which is what makes the forgetting so strange.

- Unnatural. No bride forgets her wedding dress. So the charge is forgetting Him "unnaturally and continually" — and then saying, "I have not sinned."

- Watched. Across those same days without number, He watched over them, cared for them, and never stopped thinking of them.

- Remembered. They forgot Him; He did not forget them: "Yet I will not forget you." We are engraved on the palms of His hands.

- Wanted back. This is grieved love speaking, as at Ephesus over an abandoned first love. Its aim is to bring the backsliders back.

Jeremiah 2:33 · Darby

How dost thou trim thy way to seek love! Therefore hast thou also accustomed thy ways to wickedness.

Jeremiah 2 is God's case against a people He once loved as a bride, and here He points to their skill: they have become experts at hunting for new love. So who was Judah courting, and what did the nations learn from her?

The lovers she was courting

The "love" she hunted for was found in other nations. Judah turned to the great powers of the day, first to one and then to the other.

In our chapter we learn that the nation of Israel was seeking the lethal waters of Egypt and Assyria (vv. 28 and 36). The people turned first to one and then to the other. But they ought to be ashamed of both. They would learn that it was an evil and bitter thing to forsake the Lord (v. 19). He cries out in sorrow: "My people have committed two evils: they have forsaken Me, the fountain of living waters, and hewed out cisterns for themselves, broken cisterns that can hold no water" (Jer. 2:13)… But it is of no avail, they were shameless and idolatrous (vv. 20–30).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The skill in the verse is the skill of switching. A new ally looked like a fresh start. It was the same sin with a new name, and the same claim of innocence.

The prophet closes this appeal on the Lord's part with a question. Had He been a desert to Israel, or a land of darkness, that they came to Him no more? They forgot Him against all nature, and forgot Him without end. They taught the wicked their own ways. Their guilt of blood was plain to see, yet they claimed to be innocent. And it was only a change of sin. Before it had been Assyria; now it was Egypt. But shame and sorrow would be all their corrupt affections gained.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Pupil turned teacher

The sharpest edge of the verse is the second half. Judah did not just copy the wicked; she taught them. That reversal reached its worst under one of her kings.

Manasseh "led Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem astray, to do more evil than the nations whom the LORD destroyed before the people of Israel." It was the worst of all corruptions — the corruption of the best. The higher the fall, the deeper the plunge… And what must the surrounding nations have thought of this record of Judah — a people who did "more evil than the nations" around them? Seven hundred years later the apostle wrote by the Spirit, "The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you." That could truly be said of Manasseh and Judah.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

This is not only Judah's story.

Such are the people of God when they follow the inclination of their own hearts, instead of walking in obedience to His word! Note too that when the saints fall into sin, it is often into worse and uglier sins than those committed by the people of the world. It is as if Satan, having gained the advantage over them, mocks them and gloats over them by putting the most horrible forms of the flesh on display.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The love she already had

The chapter opened with a memory. Once this people needed no hunt for love, because God was the only object they had.

But "you went after Me in the wilderness, in a land of deserts and pits, a land of drought and deep darkness, a land that none passes through, where no man dwells." You went after Me in the wilderness, where there was nothing to set your affections on but Myself. I Myself was the whole and sole object of your affections. This is what God remembered. He overlooks all failure. The state God notices is that He Himself was everything to them. That is what marks a heart when first converted to God — the Lord is everything to it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same words to a later people

The same complaint returns later, addressed to a church. Both times the loss is the same: first love.

The true heart is not indifferent to this departure from the Truth. He feels it deeply, as the blessed Lord Himself does. It is touching to hear Him say to the assembly at Ephesus: "But I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first" (Rev. 2:4). And to Israel also: "I remember the devotion of your youth, your love as a bride" (Jer. 2:2)… All this shows us what the heart of the Lord feels about the ungrateful behaviour of those who claim His Name.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Love remembered. God's charge starts with a memory. This people once followed Him through a land of deserts and pits, when He alone was everything to them.

- Love hunted. Later that love went to Egypt and Assyria — first one, then the other. It was a change of partner, not of heart.

- Love's skill misused. The energy that once followed God became skill at courting substitutes — while she still claimed to be innocent.

- Love's poison spread. A people meant to show God to the nations taught them evil instead, so the nations blasphemed His name.

- Love recalled. The same voice that says "you have taught your ways" also says "I remember." The call to Judah is the call to Ephesus: come back to the love you had at first.

Jeremiah 2:34 · Darby

Yea, in thy skirts is found the blood of the souls of the innocent poor, whom thou didst not encounter breaking in, but [it is found] upon all these.

God's case against Judah moves from tender memory to hard evidence, and here the evidence is on her clothing: the blood of the innocent poor, in plain sight. No one had caught these victims breaking into a house, so there was no excuse — and the real question is how a people this stained could still call themselves clean.

Where the charge lands

This verse comes near the end of a long appeal. It breaks off mid-sentence at "Yet in spite of all these things," and the nation's own answer follows: "I am innocent." Commentators name the two things held together here: plain guilt for blood, and a claim of innocence.

They were self-righteous, yet quick to do evil and past correcting, and their sin was as plain as a thief caught in the act… The prophet closes this appeal on the Lord's part by asking whether He had been a desert to Israel, or a land of darkness, that they came to Him no more. They forgot Him against all nature and without stopping. They taught the wicked their own ways. Their blood-guilt was completely plain, yet they pretended to be innocent. And truly it was only a change of sin. It had been Assyria; now it was Egypt. But shame and sorrow would be the outcome of their corrupt desires.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why correction had failed

This charge does not come first. God had already struck and warned, and the verse belongs to people who felt none of it.

Because they had fallen away, God in His government let foreign nations lay their land waste and burn their cities until no one lived in them. Despite God's discipline, Israel would not be corrected (verse 30). They were indifferent, forgetting God days without number, and felt nothing of their guilt, saying, "I am innocent" (verses 32-35).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The victims God counts

The blood on the clothing is the blood of the poor. Commentators trace how such oppression starts: the fear of God goes first, and then selfishness has its way with the people God cares about.

In Israel the sin named here is less tied to the law itself. It comes from that turning away from the fear of God which lets a man give in to the selfishness of his own heart, and oppress the very people God cares about… The charge of despising the poor is repeated again and again in this prophecy.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Guilt God did not have to search for

God needed no investigation here. The stain was on the outside of the robe. Commentators add that hiding sin never works in any case.

Sin lies at the root of the mischief; and even if men sin in secret, it is no use. All stands out clear and distinct in the light of God's face.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Blood and the defiled land

Behind the stained clothing stands the law about blood in the land. Shed blood is not private business between killer and victim. It marks the whole country.

The deliberate shedding of man's blood pollutes and defiles the land, and only the shedding of the murderer's blood cleanses it. Seen in this light, we live on an earth that is deeply defiled — above all by the death of the Son of God.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The one way the stain comes off

The plea of innocence fails. Commentators point instead to a sacrifice that answers this guilt.

Deuteronomy 21 gives another rule for keeping the land from being defiled by blood, and declares that life belongs to God: when His rights are violated, He will not overlook it. We cannot fail to see that the blood of Christ is, above all, the blood Israel is guilty of here. And the blood of Jesus is the only atonement for the sin that shed it. The elders excuse themselves by pleading that they did not know what had been done… Yet nothing but the blood of the heifer that never bore a yoke can wipe away sin. In this way the guilt of innocent blood will be taken away from the people.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Blood charged. God's appeal closes with plain guilt for blood set beside a claim of innocence.

- Blood after warnings. Wasted land and burned cities had already spoken. The people still felt nothing.

- Blood of the poor. Turning from the fear of God lets selfishness crush the people God cares about. That charge is repeated again and again.

- Blood in the open. God needed no search. Secret sin already stands plain in the light of His face, and here the stain was on the outside.

- Blood for blood. Shed blood defiles the land, and only blood cleanses it. The blood of Christ lifts the guilt of innocent blood off a guilty people.

Jeremiah 2:35 · Darby

And thou sayest, Indeed I am innocent; his anger will turn from me. Behold, I will enter into judgment with thee because thou sayest, I have not sinned.

Jeremiah 2 is the Lord's long complaint against the people He rescued from Egypt: idolatry, blood, and a nation that refused all correction. By verse 35 the people still claim to be innocent, and that claim, not just the sins behind it, brings God into court with them.

The denial that closes the chapter

The appeal of the chapter ends with a people who have every mark of guilt on them and still plead a clear record.

The prophet closes this appeal on the Lord's part with a question: had He been a desert to Israel, or a land of darkness, that they came to Him no more? They forgot Him unnaturally and constantly. They taught the wicked their ways. The clearest blood-guilt lay on them, and still they pretended to be innocent.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A conscience that felt nothing

The claim did not come out of nowhere. God had sent correction again and again, and the people had refused it.

Despite God's discipline, Israel would not take correction (verse 30). They were indifferent, and forgot God days without number. They felt nothing of their guilt, and said, "I am innocent" (verses 32–35).

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Guilt that outlasts the denial

The Lord had already said that no amount of scrubbing clears the record, so a protest of innocence changes nothing.

Their iniquity was marked before the Lord, and nothing that they did could remove the stain (verse 22). Yet they denied their guilt of going after idols.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The failure of outward remedies points to where the real problem sits.

But it is of no use for a backslider to try and put things right outwardly. That is the next point. External washing will not do. It is the inside — the heart — that must be put right. "For though you wash yourself with lye and use much soap, the stain of your guilt is still before me, declares the Lord" (Jer. 2:22).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why God enters into judgment

The second half of the verse gives God's reason for taking up the case. The reason is the claim itself.

Israel's conduct made no sense. Once more it is the "Why" of the Lord. What had He done that they should turn away from Him? Can a young woman forget her ornaments, or a bride her attire? Yet His people had forgotten Him, who had loved and adorned them, days without number. He will plead with them because they said, I have not sinned.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Those same words — "I have not sinned" — turn up elsewhere in Scripture, and they carry a heavy charge.

"If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us." If we pretend not to have sinned, we make Him a liar. It is not merely that the truth is not in us; I am making God Himself untrue in His word. To say that I have no sin is to deceive myself. But to say I have not sinned is to deny God's truth openly, because He says all have sinned. I am really denying the whole truth of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Justifying yourself or judging yourself

Self-defence is not a neutral move. Either we are in the wrong, or God is.

It is of the very greatest moral importance to see this: whenever we justify ourselves, we condemn God. And when we condemn ourselves, we justify God… The greatest folly anyone can be guilty of is to justify himself, since God must then charge him with sin. But the truest wisdom is to condemn oneself utterly, for in that case God becomes the Justifier.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The next chapter of Jeremiah shows how little God asks for before mercy flows.

So in Jeremiah 3, after pressing all this upon them, the Lord says: "Only acknowledge your guilt, that you rebelled against the Lord your God… and that you have not obeyed my voice, declares the Lord. Return, O faithless children, declares the Lord; for I am married to you. I will take you, one from a city and two from a family, and I will bring you to Zion."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Forsaken — the charge is not a list of faults. They left the God who brought them out and blessed them, and everything else follows.

- Denied — the people refused correction until they felt no guilt at all. Blood and idolatry stood against them, and still they said they were innocent.

- Marked — the Lord had their guilt on record, and no washing on the outside could lift it. The problem was the heart, not the surface.

- Pleaded — God brings them to judgment because they claim they have not sinned. To deny sin is to deny God's own word about us.

- Acknowledged — God asks for one step — own the wrong. The moment we condemn ourselves, He becomes the Justifier and calls the faithless to return.

Jeremiah 2:36 · Darby

Why dost thou gad about so much, and change thy way? Thou shalt also be brought to shame by Egypt, as thou wast brought to shame by Assyria.

Jeremiah has been describing a nation that traded the living God for supports of its own choosing. Now the Lord names the habit itself: Judah keeps running from one great power to the next, and each new ally will end the same way the last one did — in shame.

A Shift of Sin, Not a Change of Heart

The movement looks like new policy, but the direction never changes. One commentator sees the swap of one ally for another as the same sin in new clothes:

And truly it was only a shift of sin. It had been Assyria; now it was Egypt. But shame and sorrow would be the outcome for their corrupt desires.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Assyria: the Shame Already Proved

The verse points backwards before it points forwards. Judah had tried this road already. King Ahaz asked Assyria for help, and Assyria later turned on his son's kingdom:

The Lord could not forget that Judah, through Ahaz the king, had sought the help of the king of Assyria. After visiting the king of Assyria, Ahaz then made an altar for another god (2 Kings 16:7, 10–13)... Ahaz had sent for the help of the Assyrians, and Israel became their servants. Yet the Assyrians attacked Judah in the days of the son of Ahaz. This surely made Judah ashamed of those they had trusted.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Egypt: the Next Disappointment

Judah's new partner was no safer. Egypt had her own account to settle with God:

Egypt, too, was to reap the results of her ways. Israel kept turning to her for help instead of turning to the Lord (Jer. 2:17-18). Now the Lord says, "You shall be put to shame by Egypt" (Jer. 2:36). Chapter 46 records His word about her.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A power that is itself under judgment cannot shelter anyone.

Why These Roads Were Closed

These alliances were not politics alone. They came from hearts that wanted the wrong company:

"And now what do you gain by going to Egypt to drink the waters of the Nile? Or what do you gain by going to Assyria to drink the waters of the Euphrates?" (Jer. 2:18). After their redemption neither Egypt nor Assyria had anything to do with Israel until they got away from God. But their hearts, away from God, longed for evil association, and received their due reward.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Claim of Innocence

The warning was needed because the nation would not admit anything was wrong. They claimed innocence, so God refused the supports they leaned on:

Israel was still wicked, yet said, "I have not sinned." So the Lord righteously rejected the things they trusted in (vv. 35 and 37). They had become to Him the degenerate plant of a strange vine.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Shame Meant to Bring Them Back

The chapter's rebuke carries hope too. One writer notes the word that enters Scripture here and what it assumes:

Now here is the first time we get the word "backsliding." Then you get the expression again in Jeremiah 3, in verses 6, 8, 11, 12, 14 and 22. It is the characteristic word in the early part of Jeremiah. But it assumes recovery — that the heart will be turned back again to God, because that is what the Lord wants. He longs to have us very near Him. And do not our hearts love to be near Him? But if I am away from Him, and His hand is on me, I cannot blame Him. Is the blame His? No — I know Him too well to say that.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

When His hand falls on a wandering people, the fault is theirs, not His.

Summary

- Way — The charge is against a road, not one decision. The same heart that left God keeps changing partners without ever changing direction.

- Shift — Trading Assyria for Egypt was "only a shift of sin." A new ally is not repentance, and shame follows the desires that chose it.

- Shame — Assyria had already shamed Judah under Ahaz. God points to that proven failure as evidence that Egypt will do the same.

- Sham — Every support is itself under God's judgment, so nothing they lean on can stand. Chapter 46 records Egypt's own sentence.

- Sorrow — Their plea of innocence costs them the supports they trusted. Yet "backsliding" is a word that assumes a way back, because God wants the heart near Him again.

Jeremiah 2:37 · Darby

Thou shalt indeed go forth from her with thy hands upon thy head; for Jehovah hath rejected those thou confidest in, and thou shalt not prosper by them.

Chapter 2 closes God's long case against His people. They kept switching allies — first Assyria, then Egypt — while insisting they had done nothing wrong. The verdict is short: God has already rejected the helpers they trust, so the new alliance will fail them too.

Assyria had already shamed them

The reference to being ashamed of Assyria points back to real history. Judah had once asked Assyria for protection, and the protector turned on them.

Ahaz had sent for the help of the Assyrians, and Israel became their servants. Those same Assyrians then attacked Judah in the days of Ahaz's son. That surely made Judah ashamed of those in whom they had placed their confidence.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

A change of partners, not of heart

Turning from one great power to another looked like a new policy. It was the same sin in a new form, and the excuses for it were worthless.

They excused themselves, but in vain. And truly it was only a shift of sin. It had been Assyria; it was now Egypt. But shame and sorrow would be the lot of their corrupt affections.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God rejected their supports

God did not reject their supports at random. He rejected them because the people still claimed to be innocent, and He rejected both allies at once.

In our chapter we learn that the nation of Israel was seeking the deadly waters of Egypt and Assyria. The people turned first to one and then to the other. God would make them ashamed of both. They would learn that it was an evil and bitter thing to forsake the Lord. … They were still wicked, yet Israel said, "I am innocent." So the Lord rightly rejected the things they trusted in.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The staff that breaks in the hand

Egypt could not deliver what it promised. One writer explains why God Himself must break the prop His people lean on.

Egypt has been a breaking staff to Israel, a staff of reed that offered much but never kept its promises, bringing only ruin to all who trusted it. Going down to Egypt for help was the constant snare of God's people. Yet He had delivered them from that land. In their own deliverance they had seen His judgment on it. Yet again and again they could turn back to it. … God Himself must therefore break this staff that they leaned on.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

No prospering by escape

"You will not prosper by them" came true later in the same book. After Jerusalem fell, some of the people fled to Egypt to escape Babylon's rule.

God's discipline does not always come at once. But it is always perfectly designed, proportionate and effective. If we run away from discipline, the problem that caused it will catch up with us, and the outcome is likely to be even worse. These people could have stayed in Jerusalem and accepted Babylon's rule. Then they could have lived quietly in their own country. But having fled to Egypt, they were still within Nebuchadnezzar's reach, and they would die.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

The same instinct in us

The same instinct is not limited to ancient treaties. We look sideways for help every day, and God's kindness is to let that help fail us.

How prone we are to look to our fellow men for sympathy, help and counsel! We do it on every occasion, instead of looking directly and only to God. This is a serious mistake. In principle it is to forsake the Fountain of living waters. It is to hew out for ourselves broken cisterns that can hold no water. What can we expect? What must the outcome be? Barrenness and desolation. Our God, in real faithfulness to us, will let our fellow man fail us, so that we may learn the folly of leaning on an arm of flesh.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Forsaking. The root problem in this chapter is leaving the Fountain of living waters. Every later failure, including the hunt for allies, grows out of that one departure.

- Shifting. Moving from Assyria to Egypt changed nothing. It was only a shift of sin, and denying guilt was the excuse that kept it going.

- Rejecting. They claimed to be innocent. So God rejected the very helpers they were running to, and not just the outcome they hoped for.

- Breaking. What they leaned on was a staff of reed. God breaks such props on purpose, so His people stop leaning on man.

- Returning. Flight never prospers. Those who ran to Egypt stayed within reach of the very power they feared. The failure of every other help is meant to drive us back to God alone.

Jeremiah 3:1 · Darby

They say, If a man put away his wife, and she go from him, and become another man's, shall he return unto her again? Would not that land be utterly polluted? But thou hast committed fornication with many lovers; yet return to me, saith Jehovah.

Jeremiah opens chapter 3 with a rule from Israel's law: a wife who is sent away and marries another man may never go back to her first husband. God applies that rule to Israel — and then calls her back anyway.

The Law Standing Behind the Question

When a man in Israel put away his wife, the law set out what came next:

In such a case in Israel he was required to give her a certificate of divorce, which left her free to marry another (vv. 1-3). But if she did marry another man and he also divorced her, or if he died, then the former husband must not take her back as a wife (v. 4). This would be most improper, for he had rejected her earlier for what he considered good reason. This is called "an abomination before the Lord." If there had been no marriage to another man, the case would be different. The law is firm and decided about this matter. Yet when the grace of God is known, it can lead to honest self-judgment in those who are guilty. It can wonderfully overcome the evil by a gracious and righteous recovery.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

So the verse opens with a legal barrier. Under that law, the answer to "will he return to her?" is no.

The Charge Against Israel

Kelly reads the charge as a settled habit, not one failure:

God, however, is nowhere more Himself than in His tender mercy to His fallen people. A man could not take back the wife who had deserted him for another. "Israel had committed fornication with many lovers: yet return again to me, says the Lord." He points out their frequent and shameless unfaithfulness, while they call Him the father and guide of their youth. But whatever they said, they kept on doing evil (vv. 1-5).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Notice the two names side by side: the woman with many lovers, and the God she still calls the guide of her youth.

The Bill of Divorce

Divorce is the picture the prophets use for what God did with Israel. Later in this chapter He hands her the certificate:

Divorce is used symbolically to express God's action in putting away Israel, who had been grossly unfaithful, and giving her a bill of divorcement. Isa. 50:1; Jer. 3:8.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The tie had been cut in legal form. Bellett notes what grace does after that:

So Jeremiah shows the Lord acting in the very same grace, taking Jerusalem back even after she had proved herself unfaithful and had been legally and judicially put away. Jer. 3.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Call the Law Could Not Make

Commentators read the closing words as an invitation, not a closed door:

In Jeremiah 3 the Lord takes a different figure, and likens the sin of His people to harlotry. Even though their sin was as deep as that, we read, "Yet return again to me, says the Lord" (Jer. 3:1). So deep was His desire for their restoration.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

A note on wording: the ESV puts this line as a question, "and would you return to me?" The older translation quoted here reads it as an invitation: "yet return again to me."

Where the Pleading Is Heading

The pleading in this chapter also puts Judah in the picture:

In Jeremiah 3 we have the Lord pleading with them. He shows them that, bad as Israel might have been, Judah — which had held out for a time and gave fair promises under Josiah — would turn out no better. The crisis would surely come; but when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The promise reaches far beyond Jeremiah's own day:

Nothing can be more clear than this prediction, and nothing more gracious. Here God's grace steps in for the whole people in the last days. That is after the Assyrian captivity, which had already happened, and after the Babylonian one, which was about to happen. After all that, God would recall His people — not part of them, but all of them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- The law — Israel's own rule forbade a husband to take back a wife who had gone to another man. That barrier stands at the front of the verse.

- The guilt — the charge is not one lapse but many lovers, and God names it, while she still calls Him the guide of her youth.

- The divorce — the separation was legal and judicial, not a mood; God had handed her the certificate.

- The grace — over that legal barrier comes the call to return, showing how deeply He wants her back.

- The end — the pleading leads to a promised recall of the whole people. God is nowhere more Himself than in mercy to those who have fallen furthest.

Jeremiah 3:2 · Darby

Lift up thine eyes unto the heights and see, where hast thou not been lain with? In the ways hast thou sat for them, as an Arab in the wilderness; and thou hast polluted the land with thy fornications and with thy wickedness.

Jeremiah 3 opens with a legal question. A husband cannot take back a wife who has left him for another man. God then tells Israel to lift her eyes to the bare heights and look. He is not inviting her to admire the view. He is asking her to name one place in the land she has not defiled.

The heights and what happened there

Israel copied her neighbours, who worshipped their gods on the hills. One writer explains how these sites spread, and why God rejected them all — even the ones built for His own worship.

It seems the Canaanite nations used to set up places of worship for their false gods on various heights. They chose those heights to suit their own Satan-controlled desires... The Israelites were to destroy all the high places of the heathen, and so express their horror at their wicked ways. But human nature is no better in those who are near to God than in those who are far from Him. The time soon came, sadly, when Israel chose high places for themselves. Some of these were for idolatrous worship, and some for the worship of Jehovah. But all the high places offended Him, whatever the motives of those who set them up. They were the expression of self-will, of hearts that would not obey His commandments.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why God calls it whoring

The verse uses shocking language. One writer shows why that word fits what Israel did, and where it left her with God.

"High places" for idolatrous worship dotted the whole land. In the shade of every green tree the people practised the horrors of heathen religion. Spiritually and literally, these unholy and unclean rites deserved the name of harlotry the prophets so often gave them. What could God do with such a nation but put them away?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Sitting and waiting: guilt that goes looking

The verse pictures her sitting by the road and waiting. She did not just take in idolatry when it came to her; she went looking for it. One writer describes the same appetite in Jerusalem.

The Lord then details the extreme impurity that Jerusalem turned to with unbridled lust. She did not only take in every uncleanness of idolatry that passed by. She went out and courted idolatrous dealings with the strangers on every side, and with the most distant Gentiles. Even her Philistine neighbours, content with their own gods, were ashamed of her.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A defiled land and an outward reform that changed nothing

The verse ends with the land itself polluted. Yet Jeremiah spoke while the nation was going through a reform under king Josiah. One writer notes what God saw underneath it.

Jeremiah 3 has the same character. It carries on the same address. But it gives details of Israel's and Judah's behaviour. It also announces the restoration of Israel by sovereign goodness, and the blessing of the last days when they return to God. Notice this. Before the Lord pleads with Israel over their folly, He first points out that no one sought Him and no one longed for Him. Neither people nor priests said, "Where is the LORD?"... In this chapter we have the solemn revelation that, as far as the people were concerned, the reformation under Josiah was only hypocrisy.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Grace after the charge

Human law had no answer for a marriage like this. One writer shows what God does with it.

God, however, is nowhere more Himself than in His pitiful mercy to His fallen people. A man could not take back the wife who had deserted him for another... He points out their frequent and shameless unfaithfulness, while all the time they called Him the father and guide of their youth. But whatever they said, they kept on doing evil.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The guilt is fully named, yet the appeal keeps coming. One writer describes what runs through this part of Jeremiah:

Here is divine love pleading tenderly with a bold, faithless, shameless people. Here are the assurances of forgiveness and everlasting mercy. They are deeply touching.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Summary

- Look: God tells His people to survey the heights. Self-will built those places. They offended Him whatever the worshipper's motive.

- Name: What happened there earns the word harlotry. Spiritually and literally, it stands condemned.

- Seek: The sin was not passive. She sat by the road and waited. She did not just take idolatry in; she courted it.

- Underneath: Josiah's reform looked good from the outside. The chapter calls it hypocrisy, because nobody was asking, "Where is the LORD?"

- Yet: The charge is total and the land defiled. Still God pleads. His mercy toward a fallen people is where He is most Himself.

Jeremiah 3:3 · Darby

And the showers have been withholden, and there hath been no latter rain; but thou hast a harlot's forehead, thou refusest to be ashamed.

God has been listing Israel's unfaithfulness. Now He points at the sky. The rain stopped, and the nation still would not link the drought with its own conduct. Two things stand together in this verse: blessing held back as a warning, and a face that will not blush.

Where the verse sits

The words fall inside a plea, not a verdict. One commentator sums up the chapter's opening. There God argues like a husband whose wife has left him:

God is nowhere more Himself than in His tender mercy to His fallen people. A man could not take back the wife who had deserted him for another. He points out their frequent and shameless unfaithfulness, while they still called Him the father and guide of their youth. But whatever they said, they kept on doing evil.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The rain is real rain

One writer says the rain in this verse means real rain, and points to passages that show it:

The rain has an entirely literal meaning. Read the following passages carefully for confirmation: Leviticus 26:4; Deuteronomy 11:14-17; 1 Kings 8:33-35 and Jeremiah 3:3.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A dry sky is a message

God had told Israel plainly that rain and obedience went together. So an empty sky was never bad luck:

We know well that God does not want His people to suffer. He is not stingy, and if the rain is withheld, the fault lies with His people and not with Him. He had made this clear to them, so that they understood that when heaven was "shut up" it was in chastening.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The rain had been tied to a promise. Another writer traces that promise and its withdrawal:

God had promised Israel that if they would listen to His commandments, love Him, and serve Him with all their heart and soul, He would give them the rain of their land in its season, the early rain and the latter rain, so that they might gather in their grain, their wine, and their oil. But Israel, by their disobedience and departure from their God, had forfeited this promise, and God in chastisement had withheld both the early and the latter rain… God never withholds from His people except to draw out their sense of need, and to teach them that He alone is the source from which blessing comes.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The forehead tells the truth

The second half of the verse moves from the sky to the face. In the Bible the forehead stands for a person's open character:

Forehead: used as a symbol of manifest character. Israel in apostasy is described as having a harlot's forehead, and refusing to be ashamed (Jeremiah 3:3). Ezekiel's forehead was made as hard as diamond, because of the hardness of Israel's forehead, with whom he had to contend (Ezekiel 3:8-9).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

When correction stops working

A refusal to be ashamed comes at the end of a long road. One writer lists the corrections God sent, one after another, and what came of them:

The Lord had sent different chastisements on them at different times. There had been famines and drought. Rain fell in one place and not another, so that they might recognise the hand of God in it… Five times in this section we find the same statement, "Yet you have not returned to Me." They were an unrepentant nation and hardened their hearts as Pharaoh did.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The offer still stands

Even after the language of prostitution, God still calls Israel back. The writer quotes Jeremiah 3:1 from an older translation, which reads the line as an invitation rather than the ESV's question:

In Jeremiah 3 the Lord takes a different figure, and likens the sin of His people to harlotry. Even though their sin was as deep as that, we read, "Yet return again to Me, says the Lord" (Jeremiah 3:1). So deep was His desire for their restoration.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

One writer looks ahead to the day when Israel's conscience does answer:

Their conscience will be truly reached then, and they will return to the One they had forsaken and forgotten. "Behold we come to You," they say, "for You are the Lord our God" (v. 22).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Rain — literal. The withheld showers and spring rain mean real weather, not a picture of spiritual blessing.

- Drought — deliberate. When heaven is shut up, the fault lies with the people, not with a stingy God. It is chastening, sent to draw out their sense of need.

- Forehead — revealing. The forehead shows a person's real character. Here it shows a settled boldness that no longer cares who is watching.

- Shame — refused. Correction that is ignored again and again ends in hardness, the same road Pharaoh took.

- Return — still open. Even to a people described in these terms the word stands: return to Me. The full answer comes when their conscience answers at last and they say, "You are the Lord our God."

Jeremiah 3:4 · Darby

Wilt thou not from this time cry unto me, My father, thou art the guide of my youth?

Jeremiah 3 opens with God speaking to a people who had left Him the way a wife leaves a husband. Verse 4 catches them turning back with warm, familiar words. They call Him Father. They call Him the guide of their youth. Do such words mean anything when the life behind them has not changed?

God's Mercy Behind the Charge

The reproach in this verse sits inside a plea, not a dismissal. One writer reads verses 1 to 5 together and finds God most like Himself where His people are at their worst:

God, however, is nowhere more Himself than in His pitiful mercy to His fallen people. A man could not take back the wife who had deserted him for another... He points out their frequent and shameless unfaithfulness, while they call Him the father and guide of their youth. But whatever they said, they kept on doing evil.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"The Guide of My Youth"

The title is not one God rejects. (The ESV reads "friend of my youth." Older translations, which the writers here follow, read "guide of my youth.") Translations also differ on the timing. The ESV asks what Israel has just now said. Others read the verse as God's appeal that from this time on they cry to Him. One writer takes it that way, and looks on to a day when the nation will mean it:

Jeremiah 3 goes on to expose their unfaithfulness and what it now costs them. It also pleads with them to cry to the Guide of their youth (vv. 1-5)... The call which follows to return and confess to the One who is married to them looks on to a future day... when in a national sense Israel shall call Him "My Father," and "not turn away from following Him" (vv. 14-19). This has never yet taken place, as we know.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Claiming God as Father

The same self-confidence turns up centuries later. John the Baptist and the Lord both answer it:

In John the Baptist's time Israel shows the same spirit of self-confidence. They said in that spirit, "We have Abraham as our father." Under the Lord's ministry it is still the same: they still boast in the fatherhood of Abraham and of God (John 8). But these boasts were empty, as both John and the Lord tell them.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Another writer puts the same question to us today:

In practice they were not His children, whatever claims they might make. We know today that a true believer is a child of God. But if someone is living in rebellion, would it be right for him to announce to others that he is a child of God? He might well be answered as the Lord answered the Jews who claimed to be Abraham's children: "If you were Abraham's children, you would be doing the works Abraham did" (John 8:39).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The Invitation Inside the Rebuke

Something new enters here, and it echoes through the rest of the book:

Chapter 3:1-5. Here God gives the gracious invitation for the first time: "Return again to Me, says the LORD." And how many times after this the Lord pleads in the riches of His mercy for His people to return to Him and offers them forgiveness.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

(Note: older translations read Jeremiah 3:1 as this invitation — "yet return again to me". The ESV makes it a question: "and would you return to me?")

The chapter then names what verse 4 was missing:

"How can I get back?" Listen. "Only acknowledge your iniquity" (Jer. 3:13). There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession. "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness" (1 John 1:9).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Words Made Your Own

A person can say these words and mean them. One writer presses them on young readers starting out in life:

Will you not pause, dear ones, before you set out on the untried path that may lie ahead? Will you make the words of Scripture your own, and say to that great and holy God, whose goodness has surrounded you with so many mercies, "My Father, you are the guide of my youth" (Jer. 3:4)?

Modernised from C. J. LaddOriginal wording

Summary

- Youth — God accepts the title "guide of my youth". The trouble is not the name but the life that contradicts it.

- Words — Israel said the right thing and kept doing wrong. Fair speech, unchanged life.

- Claim — calling God Father settles nothing on its own. Israel boasted, "We have Abraham as our father," and the Lord pointed them to the works Abraham did.

- Mercy — this passage holds the first of Jeremiah's many invitations to return. God is nowhere more Himself than here, pleading with a people who had deserted Him.

- Return — later in the chapter God names the way back: acknowledge the wrong. Confession turns the words of verse 4 from a cover-up into a homecoming — and one day the nation will say them and mean them.

Jeremiah 3:5 · Darby

Will he keep [his anger] for ever? Will he preserve it perpetually? Behold, thou hast spoken and hast done evil things, and thou art [so] determined.

Jeremiah 3 opens with God pleading with a people who had left Him, as a wife leaves her husband. By verse 5 they are speaking to Him again. They ask how long His anger will last, while their lives stay the same. The verse puts their smooth religious question next to God's verdict on the life behind it.

The setting: mercy where law had closed the door

Under human law, a husband could not take back a wife who had left him for another man. God does not act by that rule.

God, however, is nowhere more Himself than in His compassionate mercy to His fallen people. A man could not take back the wife who had deserted him for another. "Israel had committed fornication with many lovers: yet return again to me, says the Lord." He points out how often and how shamelessly they were unfaithful, while all the time they call Him the father and guide of their youth. But whatever they said, they kept on doing evil. (vv. 1-5)

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Kelly follows an older translation of verse 1, which reads that line as an invitation to return.

Fine words, unchanged lives

The last line of the verse weighs their words against their deeds. Jeremiah spoke during a national religious reform under king Josiah. One writer draws the hard conclusion this chapter presses about that reform.

In this chapter we have the solemn revelation that, as far as the people were concerned, the reformation under Josiah was nothing but hypocrisy.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The names they used for God

They ask about God's anger while using the warmest names for Him. One writer shows what the chapter wants them to do with those names.

Jeremiah 3 continues to lay bare their unfaithfulness and the present consequence of the same; pleading with them also to cry to the Guide of their youth (vv. 1-5).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Meant sincerely, those same words become a real prayer. One writer puts them in the mouth of a young person starting out in life.

Will you not stop, dear friends, before you set out on the untried path ahead of you? Make the words of Scripture your own. Say to that great and holy God, whose goodness has surrounded you with so many mercies, "My Father, You are the guide of my youth" (Jer. 3:4).

Modernised from C. J. LaddOriginal wording

Counting on mercy while choosing evil

The people who ask whether His anger lasts forever have done all the evil they could. They treat mercy as cover for sin. One writer is blunt about where that leads.

Be careful not to abuse the mercy of God. Do not suck poison out of the sweet flower of God's mercy. Do not think that because God is merciful, you may go on in sin; that is to make mercy your enemy. To sin because mercy abounds is the devil's logic. Anyone who sins because of mercy is like a man who wounds his head because he has a bandage. Anyone who sins because of God's mercy will get judgment without mercy. Mercy abused turns to fury.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The invitation still standing

The chapter does not end with the charge. It also carries God's own call to come back.

Here is the first time the gracious invitation is given: "Return again to Me, says the LORD." And how many times afterwards the Lord pleads, in the riches of His mercy, for His people to return to Him, and offers them forgiveness.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same writer traces where all this ends.

He shows them that bad as Israel might have been, Judah that had held out for a time and gave fair promises under Josiah would turn out no better. The crisis would surely come; but when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Mercy offered. God is "nowhere more Himself than in His compassionate mercy to His fallen people." Human law would not let a man take back the wife who deserted him. God calls her back.

- Mercy named. They call Him by the tenderest names, Father and guide of their youth. The chapter pleads with them to cry to that Guide, not just quote Him.

- Mercy contradicted. "Whatever they said, they kept on doing evil." The great reform of the day was, as far as the people went, "nothing but hypocrisy."

- Mercy abused. To ask whether God's anger lasts forever while doing all the evil you can is "the devil's logic." Mercy used as permission "turns to fury."

- Mercy waiting. The same chapter gives the first "Return again to Me" — and "when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace."

Jeremiah 3:6 · Darby

And Jehovah said unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen what backsliding Israel hath done? She hath gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath committed fornication.

God speaks to Jeremiah during the reign of King Josiah. Josiah had swept idolatry out of Judah. Yet God points the prophet north, at the ten tribes already carried away, and asks him what he has seen there. Judah had seen it too, and learned nothing from it.

(The ESV calls Israel "that faithless one." Older translations say "backsliding Israel," and the writers quoted below use that word.)

The timing: reform without a changed heart

The date on this message matters. Josiah was a faithful king, and idolatry was out of the land. The question is how deep that change went.

The book of Jeremiah, who prophesied under Josiah, shows us that the moral state of the people had not changed at all. The king was faithful, so they readily agreed to do away with idolatry, but their hearts stayed as far from God as ever.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Who "Israel" is here

This verse is not about Judah. It sets two sisters side by side, and what matters is what the watching one did with the sight.

There is then, first of all, a contrast between Israel (the ten tribes) and her sister Judah. The Lord judged the house of Israel, the northern kingdom, first. She played the harlot. After she had done so, the Lord said, "Turn to Me." She refused, and her treacherous sister the house of Judah saw it. And when the Lord dealt with the house of Israel in judgment and they went into captivity, Judah did not fear but played the harlot too.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

High hills and green trees

The two places named in the verse are not scenery. They were the real sites of Israel's worship, and the story behind them starts at Sinai.

God had rescued them from Egypt, and at Sinai they had promised not to disobey Him. Yet they set up the golden calf before the law even reached the camp, and the long list of later idolatries told how they had broken the covenant. "High places" for idol worship dotted the whole land, and in the shade of every green tree people carried out the detestable practices of the nations around them. Both spiritually and literally, these unholy and unclean rites deserved the name of harlotry that the prophets so often give them. What could God do with such a nation but put them away?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why hilltops and groves? Because they feel religious, and feeling is easy to mistake for the thing itself.

Israel's departure from God took an outward form: they made themselves "high places." It was only a pagan habit, a worship with no heart in it that plays on the imagination… On the mountain tops a man could imagine he was nearer to God than in the valleys. The depths of groves and forests, with the beauty of nature, helped him think he was nearer to the God of nature than he really was… It is just here that man so often makes the fatal mistake. He puts what is merely natural in the place of what is spiritual, and so deceives himself.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Why the language is so raw

God does not call this bad policy or poor religion. He speaks as a husband whose wife has left him — and then does what no wronged husband would do.

God is nowhere more Himself than in His tender mercy to His fallen people. A man could not take back the wife who had deserted him for another. "Israel had committed fornication with many lovers: yet return again to Me, says the Lord." He points out their repeated and shameless unfaithfulness, while all the time they were calling Him the father and guide of their youth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

(The line quoted here is Jeremiah 3:1 in an older translation. The ESV puts it as a question: "and would you return to me?")

A word that expects a way back

"Backsliding" is the keyword of these chapters, and it carries an assumption inside it.

Here is the first time we get the word "backsliding."… It is the characteristic word in the early part of Jeremiah. But then it supposes recovery, and that the heart will be turned back again to God, because that is what the Lord wants.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

He names one condition for coming back.

How can I get back? Listen. "Only acknowledge your guilt" (Jer. 3:13). There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession… How tender the call is: "Turn, O backsliding children, says the Lord, for I am married to you."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

(Jeremiah 3:14 in the ESV reads "for I am your master"; older translations read "for I am married to you.")

Summary

- Seen — God asks Jeremiah what he has seen in Israel. Judah saw it too: she watched her sister carried off in judgment and was not frightened.

- Reform — Josiah's cleanup was real, and the nation went along with it. It never changed the heart of the people.

- Places — people chose the high hills and green trees because those places made them feel close to God. That feeling is how they deceived themselves.

- Marriage — God charges Israel with unfaithfulness, not bad behaviour. He speaks as a husband — and still says "return."

- Backsliding — the word itself assumes a way home. The one condition He names is to acknowledge the sin.

Jeremiah 3:7 · Darby

And I said, After she hath done all these [things], she will return unto me; but she returned not. And her sister Judah, the treacherous, saw [it].

Jeremiah receives this word while Josiah is king in Judah. It looks back on God's patience with the northern kingdom of Israel: He waited for a return that never came. The verse ends with the southern kingdom, Judah, watching her sister. She saw everything and changed nothing.

The days of Josiah

The word came during a national reform led by a godly king. Commentators ask why that reform did not satisfy God.

The king's power had brought about a great reformation, but it left the hearts of most of the people untouched. It was the last effort of the Spirit of God to restore the people as a nation... But why could God not rest in the improved outward state of the kingdom of Judah in Josiah's day? He looked beneath the surface. He looked for what was real: a tender conscience, and a heart that submitted to His word. He did not find it. "The devotion of your youth, your love as a bride" were missing. God will never be satisfied with anything less than thoroughness.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

"She will return to me"

The words carry God's own expectation — and a mercy no human marriage law would allow.

God, however, is nowhere more Himself than in His compassionate mercy to His fallen people. A man could not take back the wife who had deserted him for another. "Israel had committed fornication with many lovers: yet return again to me, says the Lord."... Israel's uncleanness was notorious, and God had called her back in vain.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God gives Israel a name in this passage. Older translations call her "backsliding"; the ESV says "faithless." The Hebrew word behind both is harder than either sounds:

meshubah, 'a turning away, apostasy.' Jer. 2:19; Jer. 3:6-12, 22...

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

"Her treacherous sister Judah saw it"

Israel's fall was public. God meant those still standing to read it.

God began to deal with the larger part of the nation, which had already rejected their king. They had proved themselves rebels against the royal house God Himself chose for them. They completed that rebellion by turning away from God altogether. He warned them, they ignored Him, and He swept away the ten tribes of Israel first, as a most solemn lesson to those who remained. But Judah was deaf and blind to what God was pointing out through guilty Israel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Judah's advantage counted against her:

Judah was even more treacherous. She despised the warning although she knew better, and sinned even more boldly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Open failure and pretended nearness

The chapter sets two kinds of failure side by side. Israel's was open. Judah hid hers behind a show of nearness. Which of the two, then, did God find harder to bear?

God would rather have what is real, even if our souls are far from Him, than what is unreal — a claimed nearness we are not living in. The ten tribes were openly backsliding and rebellious. But what did Judah do? "Judah did not fear" (Jer. 3:8). "Judah did not return to me with her whole heart, but in pretense, declares the LORD" (Jer. 3:10). We get a great lesson there... The Lord will not have anything but what is real.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Mercy that outlasts the refusal

The refusal is not where the chapter ends. The same God who records it keeps calling her back.

"Return, backsliding children, says the Lord; for I am married to you." "Surely as a wife treacherously leaves her husband, so have you dealt treacherously with Me, O house of Israel, says the Lord. … Return, backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings. See, we come to You, for You are our God" (Jer. 3). This whole part of Jeremiah is deeply beautiful and touching. God's tender pleading with a bold, unfaithful, shameless people, and His promises of forgiveness and everlasting mercy, are moving beyond words.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Ridout is quoting an older translation of this chapter.

Summary

- God waits. He said of Israel, "she will return to me." Mercy held the door open for a wife any husband could have divorced for good.

- She did not return. The call went out and came back empty. The name God gives her means a turning away — apostasy.

- Judah saw. Israel's ruin was a solemn lesson to those still standing. Judah was deaf and blind to it.

- Seeing was not fearing. Judah knew better and still did not fear. God would rather have honest distance than a pretended nearness.

- God still pleads. The refusal does not close the chapter. The same voice keeps saying "Return," and promises to heal the failure it has just exposed.

Jeremiah 3:8 · Darby

And I saw that when for all the causes wherein backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce, yet the treacherous Judah, her sister, feared not, but went and committed fornication also.

In Josiah's reign, God draws a family picture: two sisters, one already sent away with a divorce paper, the other watching. The verse turns on what the watching sister did with what she saw.

The message belongs to Josiah's reign

The date matters. It names the two sisters and shows which one had already been judged.

The message which begins with the sixth verse was given to Jeremiah during the reign of Josiah. There is then, first of all, a contrast between Israel (the ten tribes) and her sister Judah. (Compare with Ezekiel 23.) The house of Israel, the northern kingdom, was judged first by the Lord. She played the harlot; after she had done so, the Lord said, "Turn to Me." She refused, and her treacherous sister the house of Judah saw it. And when the Lord dealt with the house of Israel in judgment and they were carried away, Judah did not fear but played the harlot.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The bill of divorce

The legal document named in this verse is a picture, not a domestic case.

Divorce is used here as a picture. It stands for God's action in putting Israel away, after she had been shamefully unfaithful, and giving her a bill of divorce. Isaiah 50:1; Jeremiah 3:8.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Judah knew better

The verse gives the two sisters different labels: Israel is the faithless one, Judah the treacherous one. Judah had something Israel never had — she had watched what unfaithfulness costs.

Israel's uncleanness was well known, and God had called her back in vain. But Judah was even more treacherous. She knew better, yet she despised the warning and sinned with even greater daring.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Judah did not fear

The next verse adds that Judah did turn back to God, but her heart was not in it. God's complaint here is not distance. It is pretending.

There was open backsliding and rebellion on the part of the ten tribes. But what did Judah do? "Judah feared not." "Judah has not turned to me with her whole heart, but in pretence, says the Lord." We get a great lesson there. The Lord will not have anything but what is real. In King Josiah's day there had been a revival, as we have seen. You would think that they had truly turned to the Lord. But it was only the effect of Josiah's influence. It was pretend. God would rather have what is real, even if our souls are at a distance, than what is unreal — a claimed nearness we are not living in.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The verdict on Josiah's revival

Josiah's reign is remembered as a time of reform. Jeremiah prophesied during those very years, and God gives His own verdict on them.

This chapter carries the solemn revelation that, as far as the people were concerned, the reformation under Josiah was only hypocrisy. These two chapters form a general introduction. They show the ways and judgment of Israel and Judah, and their restoration by grace.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same two sisters in Ezekiel

Ezekiel gives the two sisters names — Aholah the elder, and Aholibah, who is Jerusalem. He asks whether watching her elder sister did the younger any good.

Was Jerusalem admonished? Did the sight of Aholah act for good upon Aholibah? No — she was more corrupt in her lust than her sister was. The younger and more favoured sister followed the elder, and went even further in her idolatry.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Divorced — and still called back

The divorce was real. Yet God's grace reaches past it.

Jeremiah shows the Lord in that same grace. He takes Jerusalem back even after she had proved herself unfaithful and had been put away by a formal, legal judgment.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

God then turns to the sister He had sent away, and names one way back.

Now see how beautifully He works with these backsliding ten tribes to bring them back… He called them, and told them to come back. Now He calls you back. You might ask, How can I get back? You say, I feel God has spoken to my soul through His Word, I am drinking at broken cisterns, how am I to get back? Listen. "Only acknowledge your iniquity." There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen — the message comes from Josiah's reign; Judah watched God carry her sister Israel away in judgment.

- Feared not — the sight taught her nothing; she knew better, despised the warning, and sinned with even greater daring.

- Feigned — her turning was outward only; God prefers honest distance to a nearness we claim but do not live.

- Exposed — Jeremiah gives God's verdict on Josiah's celebrated reformation: as far as the people went, it was hypocrisy.

- Recalled — God calls the divorced sister home again; the one way back is confession — acknowledge your iniquity.

Jeremiah 3:9 · Darby

And it came to pass through the lightness of her fornication that she polluted the land, and committed adultery with stones and with stocks.

A good king sat on Judah's throne when these words came. They expose what his reforms never reached: a people who treated unfaithfulness to God as a small thing and left the land defiled.

The setting: a reformation that never touched the heart

The charge belongs to the reign of Josiah, a king who tore the idols down. One writer asks how deep that reform went.

Jeremiah prophesied under Josiah, and his book shows that the moral state of the people did not change at all. They were quick to agree when the king's faithfulness put an end to idol worship. But their hearts stayed as far from God as ever.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Another writer points to the verdict in the verse that follows:

The tenth verse proves beyond question that the reformation under Josiah was not a true spiritual revival. It reads: "Yet for all this her treacherous sister Judah did not return to Me with her whole heart, but in pretense, declares the LORD."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"Stone and tree" — the idols named

The verse names Judah's partners in adultery: stone and wood. Earlier in the book Jeremiah presses the same charge, and one writer shows who took part and what they said to those idols.

And this was not the masses only. Their kings, their leaders, their priests and their prophets said to a block of wood, "You are my father," and to a stone, "You gave me birth." In their trouble they might turn to God with "Arise and save us." But God challenges their gods to arise, if they can save them. And it was not for lack of numbers — Judah's gods were as many as her cities.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sin taken lightly, land left polluted

Judah's sin did not stay private. It reached the ground she lived on. Later in the same book God says what her idols cost that land, and one writer sets it beside His grace — then shows how deep the sin was cut.

But grace in their case, as in ours, in no way sets aside the governmental dealings of God... "But first I will doubly repay their iniquity and their sin, because they have polluted My land with the carcasses of their detestable idols, and have filled My inheritance with their abominations." ... The present state of Judah was all the more distressing. As the prophet says, "The sin of Judah is written with a pen of iron; with a point of diamond it is engraved on the tablet of their heart, and on the horns of their altars."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why Judah's guilt outran Israel's

God had called Israel back from this sin and been refused. Judah knew all of it and went the same way. One writer weighs the two.

Israel's uncleanness was notorious, and God had called her back in vain. But Judah was more treacherous still. She despised the warning though she knew better, and her sin was bolder still.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer explains what made Judah's guilt heavier, even with her better kings:

But in fact Judah became more offensive than Israel, Jerusalem more guilty than Samaria. Israel had pleading and warning, promise and threat, but never one ray of goodness from the throne. Judah had some good kings, and God's blessing still reached her through them... Judah as a nation stayed true on the surface, since she held to David's royal line and outwardly to the temple and the worship of the LORD. Yet in heart they were as rebellious as the Israelites. The hypocrisy of Judah was more hateful to God than Israel's open desertion of Him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Real distance over pretended nearness

One writer draws the lesson for us, and not only for Judah.

God would rather have reality, even though our souls are at a distance, than unreality and professed nearness when we are not in it... We get a great lesson there. The Lord will not have anything but what is real.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

From exposure to mercy

Naming the sin is not where the chapter stops. Within a few verses God turns from accusation to invitation.

He shows them that bad as Israel might have been, Judah — who had held out for a time and gave fair promises under Josiah — would turn out no better. The crisis would surely come; but when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer turns to anyone who wants to come back:

You say, I feel God has spoken to my soul through His Word, I am drinking at broken cisterns — how am I to get back? Listen. "Only acknowledge your guilt." There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Backdrop — Josiah pulled the idols down, but the people's hearts stayed where they were.

- Idols — Judah called a block of wood father and a stone mother. Kings, priests and prophets all joined in.

- Pollution — Judah held the sin cheap, and it defiled the land God called His own inheritance.

- Pretence — Israel sinned in the open. Judah sinned behind temple worship, and God calls that treachery.

- Return — The exposure is not the end. God appears in grace at the lowest point, and the one way back is to acknowledge the sin.

Jeremiah 3:10 · Darby

And even for all this her treacherous sister Judah hath not returned unto me with her whole heart, but with falsehood, saith Jehovah.

Jeremiah 3:10 is God's verdict on Judah at its best religious moment: King Josiah had torn down the idols and restored the temple worship. God has just sent Judah's older sister Israel away for unfaithfulness, and now He asks the hardest question a religious person can face: what does He do with a return that everyone can see but He knows is not real?

The Setting: Josiah's Reformation

God gave this word while Josiah was king. One writer takes the verse as proof of what that reformation really was:

Jeremiah received the message that begins with verse 6 during the reign of Josiah... The tenth verse proves beyond doubt that the reformation under Josiah was not a true spiritual revival.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The people did go along with him:

The king was faithful, so they readily agreed to get rid of idolatry. But their hearts stayed as far from God as ever.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The Covenant That Only One Man Meant

Josiah stood before the people and promised to obey God's book, and the whole nation stood with him. One writer sets that scene beside our verse:

On the young king's part this was all real, no doubt. But you only have to read the earlier part of Jeremiah's prophecy to see how hypocritical it was with most of the people... They had entered into covenants with the Lord before with great enthusiasm, and the result was always the same — breakdown, and a wider departure from God than ever before.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Why "Treacherous" Is Worse Than "Backsliding"

God gives the two sisters different names. Israel is the backslider; Judah is the treacherous one. The difference is not the amount of sin but how much each one knew:

Israel's uncleanness was well known, and God had called her back in vain. But Judah was even more treacherous. She knew better, yet she despised the warning and sinned even more boldly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel broke away openly. Judah kept the temple and the forms:

Judah as a nation still claimed to be true, because they held on to the house of David, and outwardly to the temple and the worship of Jehovah. Yet in heart they were as rebellious as the Israelites... The hypocrisy of Judah was more hateful to God than Israel's open desertion of Him. God had His faithful few in both kingdoms.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

God Prefers Distance to Pretense

The verse turns on the phrase "not with her whole heart." God wanted honesty, not a better performance:

God would rather have reality, even if our souls are far off, than unreality — a nearness we claim but are not in... The Lord will not accept anything that is not real.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The reform did not last. God would not rest in it, and His reason shows what He looks for:

The reformation was the last effort of the Spirit of God to restore the people as a nation, and it was followed by the dreadful relapse in the time of the sons of Josiah... But why could God not rest in the improved outward state of the kingdom of Judah in Josiah's day? He looked beneath the surface. He looked for reality, for a tender conscience, for a heart that submits to His word — and He did not find them... God will never be satisfied with anything less than thoroughness.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Same Verse, Now

A movement in a good direction always gathers a crowd, and God still reads each heart inside it:

Many claimed to follow the King in his holy zeal. But Jehovah, who knows the secrets of every heart, said, "Judah did not return to me with her whole heart, but in pretense" (Jer. 3:10). In all ages the people love to move with the tide. If the tide flows in the right direction, many will go with it — outwardly. If it flows the wrong way, most will go with it eagerly.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What God Says Next

The verdict is not the end of the chapter. God exposes the false return, then calls for a true one, and the way back is short:

"Only acknowledge your iniquity, that you have transgressed against the LORD your God"... There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession... See how tender the call is: "Return, O faithless children, declares the LORD; for I am your master."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Reform — Josiah tore down the idols and restored the worship. Inside the people, it changed nothing.

- Pretense — Judah did return in public, but "not with her whole heart." The covenant was real in the king and false in the crowd.

- Treachery — Israel sinned in the open, and God calls her backsliding. Judah sinned while keeping the temple and the forms, and God calls her treacherous, because she knew better.

- Reality — God prefers honest distance to a nearness we only claim. He looks beneath the surface for a tender conscience, and will not settle for less.

- Return — the same chapter that exposes the false turning calls for a true one. It asks only that we acknowledge our sin.

Jeremiah 3:11 · Darby

And Jehovah said unto me, Backsliding Israel hath shewn herself more just than treacherous Judah.

Josiah was busy reforming Judah when God handed down a shocking verdict: the northern kingdom, exiled long before for open idolatry, came out better than Judah with her temple and her prophets. Why would God rate open sin above careful religion — and what does He do next with the sister He has just called worse?

The setting of the comparison

The verdict has a date. Judah was in the middle of a national reform.

This section is an appeal to Jerusalem, with exhortations to repentance, and warnings about what had happened to Israel. It was given in the days of Josiah, when there had been a reformation, but they had not turned to God with the whole heart: backsliding Israel had justified herself more than treacherous Judah.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Another writer states what that reform was worth.

It is in this chapter that we have the solemn revelation that, as far as the people were concerned, the reformation under Josiah was only hypocrisy.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

(Older translations read "has justified herself more than treacherous Judah," and the writers below often use that wording. The sense is comparative: God is not calling Israel innocent.)

Why Judah is the worse of the two

Israel's sin was public, and God had already judged it. Judah watched that happen and went the same way. That is why God calls her treacherous.

Israel's uncleanness was notorious, and God had called her back in vain. But Judah was more treacherous still. She despised the warning though she knew better, and sinned even more shamelessly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The two kingdoms sinned in different ways. One walked out in the open. The other kept up the forms with the heart elsewhere.

Israel as a nation rebelled against God. Judah as a nation kept up the profession, since they held to the house of David and outwardly to the temple and worship of Jehovah. Yet in heart they were as rebellious as the Israelites. God said of them, "This people draws near with their lips, but their heart is far from Me." Judah's hypocrisy was more hateful to God than Israel's open rebellion. God had His remnant in both kingdoms.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What God measures

The comparison is not about which sin looks worse. It is about what God accepts.

God would rather have reality, even if our souls are at a distance, than unreality and a professed nearness when we are not in it. There was open backsliding and rebellion on the part of the ten tribes. But what did Judah do? "Judah did not fear." "Judah has not returned to Me with her whole heart, but in pretence, says the Lord." There is a great lesson there. The Lord will not have anything but what is real. In King Josiah's day there had been a revival. You would think that they had really turned to the Lord, but it was simply the effect of Josiah's influence. It was only pretence.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Mercy after the verdict

This verdict does not close the case. It also weighs what Judah's promises under Josiah were worth.

In Jeremiah 3 we have a pleading of the Lord with them. He shows them that, bad as Israel might have been, Judah — who had held out for a time and gave fair promises under Josiah — would turn out no better. The crisis would surely come; but when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one way back

The call that follows the verdict asks for one thing.

"Only acknowledge your iniquity." There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession. "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." The call is tender: "Turn, O backsliding children, says the Lord, for I am married to you."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

God aimed this call at exiles who had been gone for a century, and He is not finished with them.

Here is a message to be proclaimed toward the north, calling on backsliding Israel to return. He promises mercy to them. One hundred years before, the house of Israel had gone northward as captives. The Lord knew where they lived and sent them this message of mercy. He knows today where the house of Israel is, the ten tribes, and at some future time the gracious offer given here will be fulfilled in their return.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Real — God will not accept anything that is not real. Judah's return was only pretence.

- Religion — Judah kept the temple and the worship, and sinned anyway. God found her hypocrisy more hateful than Israel's open rebellion.

- Reform — Josiah's revival was the effect of the king's influence, not a turning of the heart.

- Return — God sends mercy north to exiles He had already judged. His one condition: acknowledge your iniquity.

- Remnant — God had His own in both kingdoms, and the offer of return still waits for a future day.

Jeremiah 3:12 · Darby

Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, Return, thou backsliding Israel, saith Jehovah I will not make my face dark upon you; for I am merciful, saith Jehovah; I will not keep [anger] for ever.

God speaks these words to a people already scattered. The northern kingdom had gone north as captives, and God now sends this call after them. So the verse raises two questions. How can God invite back a people He has already judged? And why does He base that invitation on His own character rather than on anything they have done?

(The ESV says "faithless Israel." Older translations say "backsliding Israel." The writers quoted below use that older wording.)

A Message Sent After the Exiles

God sends the message in one direction. That direction has a history.

Here is a message to proclaim toward the north, calling on backsliding Israel to return. He promises mercy to them. One hundred years before, the house of Israel had gone northward as captives. The Lord knew where they lived, and He sent them this message of mercy. He knows today where the house of Israel is, the ten tribes. At some future time the gracious offer given here will be completed in their return.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the Open Sinner Is Called First

Just before this call, God says that faithless Israel has shown herself more righteous than treacherous Judah. One writer explains that comparison.

Israel's uncleanness was well known, and God had called her back without result. But Judah was even more treacherous. She despised the warning, though she knew better, and sinned even more boldly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel sinned in the open. Judah kept up appearances. God prefers the first.

God would rather have what is real, even if our souls are far from Him, than what is unreal — a nearness we claim but are not actually in. There was open backsliding and rebellion on the part of the ten tribes. But what did Judah do? "Judah did not fear." "Judah did not return to me with her whole heart, but in pretense, declares the LORD." We get a great lesson there. The Lord will not have anything but what is real.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The Word "Backsliding" Itself

The term first appears in chapter 2 and then dominates chapter 3. It is not a word of dismissal.

Now here is the first time we get the word "backsliding." You then find the expression again in verses 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, and 22 of Jeremiah 3. It is the characteristic word in the early part of Jeremiah. But the word assumes recovery. It assumes the heart will turn back to God, because that is what the Lord wants. He longs to have us very near Him.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

"For I Am Merciful"

God gives a reason for holding back His anger, and that reason lies in Himself, not in Israel. The chapter opens by showing how far gone the people were.

God, however, is nowhere more Himself than in His mercy and pity toward His fallen people. A man could not take back the wife who had left him for another. Israel had been unfaithful with many lovers, and still the Lord says: return to me. He points out how often and how shamelessly they had been unfaithful, even while they called Him the father and guide of their youth. But whatever they said, they persevered in evil-doing.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer says when that mercy appears.

He shows them that Judah would turn out no better than Israel, bad as Israel had been. Judah had held out for a time and had made fair promises under King Josiah. The crisis would surely come; but when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The One Thing Asked

The call does not come with a list of conditions. Verse 13 names a single one.

Backslider! He called them then, and told them to come back. Now He calls you back. You might ask, How can I get back? You say: God has spoken to my soul through His Word. I am drinking at broken cisterns. How am I to get back? Listen. "Only acknowledge your guilt." There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Why He Cannot Simply Let Them Go

Verse 14 supplies the reason underneath verse 12 — He is married to them.

The whole history of Israel as a nation proves that the Lord hates sending His people away. If He did not hate it, He would have renounced Israel long ago, and many times over. They broke His covenant again and again, and so lost every claim on His favour and love. But He bore with them with great patience, for His gifts and His calling are never taken back. In the prophets He kept reminding them that He was joined to them, that He was married to them, and that He could not cast them off.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Return — the word. "Backsliding" already points to a way back. The name God gives the wanderer leans toward her coming home.

- Return — the cause. The anger is withheld "for I am merciful." The reason sits in God's character, not in Israel's record.

- Return — the condition. One thing only: acknowledge the wrongdoing. Confession, not repair work, is the road back.

- Return — the reach. God aims the message north, at exiles carried away a century before. He knows where they are.

- Return — the ground. He is married to them. That bond, not their faithfulness, is why the call keeps coming.

Jeremiah 3:13 · Darby

Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against Jehovah thy God, and hast turned thy ways hither and thither to the strangers under every green tree; and ye have not hearkened to my voice, saith Jehovah.

God speaks here to Israel, the ten northern tribes. He had already put them away for their unfaithfulness. Now He names the one condition for their return. It is startling how little He asks: an honest owning of what they have done.

Grace at the Lowest Point

This call comes after a long list of charges against the nation. God exposes both kingdoms before He invites either one home.

I need not dwell on the bitter charges of the prophet. The Jews did a double evil. They forsook the Lord, the only source of living waters. They turned instead to cisterns that could hold no water, rushing into idolatry and all its corrupting influences. But in Jeremiah 3 we have a pleading of the Lord with them. He shows them that bad as Israel might have been, Judah would turn out no better. Judah had held out for a time and gave fair promises under Josiah. The crisis would surely come; but when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God Asks for Honesty

Just before this call, God sets the two kingdoms side by side. Israel sinned in the open. Judah made a show of returning, but her heart was not in it. That contrast explains why God asks first for honesty.

God would rather have reality, even though our souls are at a distance, than unreality and a claimed nearness we are not in. There was open backsliding and rebellion on the part of the ten tribes. But what did Judah do? "Judah did not fear." "Judah did not return to Me with her whole heart, but in pretense, declares the LORD." There is a great lesson there. The Lord will not have anything but what is real.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What They Had to Own

The verse points to what they did "under every green tree." That was not a private failure. It covered the whole land.

High places for idol worship dotted the whole land, and in the shade of every green tree the people carried on the detestable practices of the nations. These unholy and unclean rites deserved the name the prophets so often give them: harlotry. It fits in both senses, the spiritual and the literal. What could God do with such a nation but put them away?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Only

The small word "only" carries the weight of the verse. It marks out a single road home, and one that anyone can take.

Backslider! He called them then, and told them to come back. Now He calls you back. You might ask, How can I get back? You say, I feel God has spoken to my soul through His Word, I am drinking at broken cisterns — how am I to get back? Listen. "Only acknowledge your guilt." There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession. "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." How tender that call is. There was no break of relationship on God's part.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Even After a Revival

This word came in the days of Josiah, when the nation had turned back to God and blessing had returned. Even then, God did not drop the call to confess.

The historical books of the Old Testament show us how the merciful Lord renewed His blessing whenever the people returned to Him. But if we read the prophets, we see how God searches deeply. He judges the evil that must not remain after the blessing has returned. In the time of Josiah we see a good return of the people towards God, and abundant blessing with it. Even so, at the Lord's command, Jeremiah still says to the people, "Acknowledge your guilt."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What Confession Opens Onto

What follows the call is a promise far larger than a return from exile. It looks to a day still ahead.

Nothing can be more distinct than this prediction, and nothing more gracious. Here we clearly have God's grace stepping in for the whole people in the last days. That is after both the Assyrian captivity, which had already happened, and the Babylonian one that was about to happen. After all that, God would recall His people — not part of them, but all of them. He would recall Israel, and He would recall Judah. He would bring them both back into the land. He would bless them there so richly that all the ancient blessing they had known, even what was known under David and Solomon, would fade beside the brighter glory of the whole united people. From that time they would never depart from the Lord again.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Bottom — God lays every charge first. Then, when a person has sunk to the lowest, He appears in His grace.

- Real — God prefers honest distance to pretended nearness. Judah's return was only "in pretense," and He will not have anything but what is real.

- Only — God asks one thing, and anyone can give it: own the sin. Confession is the single road back.

- Deep — Even a real revival does not cancel this word. God still judges the evil that remains after blessing returns.

- Beyond — On the far side of confession is more than pardon. God brings His whole people home, and they never depart from Him again.

Jeremiah 3:14 · Darby

Return, backsliding children, saith Jehovah; for I am a husband unto you, and I will take you, one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion.

The Lord calls a runaway people home, on the ground of a bond He still holds. Two questions press: what is that bond, and who are the "one from a city and two from a family" He promises to bring to Zion?

Grace at the lowest point

The chapter first sets out Israel's failure. What makes the appeal remarkable is its timing.

I need not dwell on the bitter charges of the prophet. The Jews did a double evil. They forsook the Lord, the only source of living waters. They turned instead to cisterns that could hold no water, running to idolatry and all its corrupting influences. But in Jeremiah 3 we have a pleading of the Lord with them. He shows them that Judah would turn out no better than Israel. Judah had held out for a time and gave fair promises under Josiah. The crisis would surely come; but when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer sees the same order: judgment first, then grace.

Once judgment has fallen on Israel, God can let His heart flow out in the testimony of grace. This must give a place to Judah as well, since the two are to be united.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The marriage bond

The ESV gives God's reason as "for I am your master." The writers here quote older translations, which read "I am a husband to you" or "I am married to you." Either way, God holds Israel in a bond her unfaithfulness did not dissolve — and Isaiah uses the same language.

The Jewish body was so married — "for I am married to you, says Jehovah" (Jer. 3:14; Isa. 54:4-6). "For your Maker is your husband; Jehovah has called you as a woman forsaken and grieved in spirit, and a wife of youth when you were refused, says your God."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

One writer uses this verse to mark a difference between what Israel had with the Lord and what the church has now.

The prophet Jeremiah addressed Israel as married to Jehovah (ch. 3:14). But the Church is only promised in marriage; the wedding is still ahead.

Modernised from H H SnellOriginal wording

The one condition

The call is to return, and the verse just before names what returning involves.

Backslider! He called them then, and told them to come back. Now He calls you back. You might ask, How can I get back?... Listen: "Only acknowledge your iniquity" (Jer. 3:13). There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession. "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness" (1 John 1:9). What a tender call it is.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Gathered one by one, to Zion

"One from a city and two from a family" sounds like a thin harvest. God picks them out one by one, yet what He gathers is a whole nation restored.

Nothing can be more distinct than this prediction, nor more gracious. Here God's grace steps in for the whole people in the latter day. That is after the Assyrian captivity, which had already happened, and after the Babylonian one, which was still to come. After all that, God would recall His people — not part of them, but the whole of them. He would recall Israel and He would recall Judah. He would bring them both back into the land. He would bless them there so richly that even the ancient blessing they once had — the ark of the covenant, and all that was known under David and Solomon — would pass away. It would be completely outshone by the brighter glory of the whole united people in the latter day. And from that time they would never leave the Lord again.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Still ahead

One writer places the fulfilment of this promise ahead of us, not behind.

The call which follows is a call to return and confess to the One who is married to them. It looks on to a future day. Then the ark of the covenant of the Lord will be outshone by a greater glory, and the true King will reign... This has never yet taken place, as we know. It supposes the return of our Lord Jesus Christ to Israel as David's greater Son. Their conscience will be truly reached then, and they will return to the One they had forsaken and forgotten.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Bond — the appeal rests on a tie God still owns. He speaks as a husband to a wife who left Him, and her unfaithfulness did not cancel it.

- Bottom — the call comes after the failure is complete: when a person has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

- Confession — there is one way back. Own the sin, and God forgives and cleanses.

- Gathering — He takes them one from a city and two from a family. Yet the whole people come to Zion, never to leave again.

- Fulfilment — none of this has happened yet. Writers point to the return of Christ as David's greater Son, when Israel's conscience answers at last.

Jeremiah 3:15 · Darby

And I will give you shepherds according to my heart, and they shall feed you with knowledge and understanding.

Jeremiah 3 shows God pleading with a people who had left Him for idols. In the middle of that appeal He promises them shepherds of His own giving, which raises two questions: what makes a shepherd "after God's own heart," and when does this promise come true?

The call that comes first

God does not make this promise to people who have cleaned themselves up. He ties it to an invitation to come back, and one writer names the single condition:

Notice how beautifully He works with these backsliding ten tribes to bring them back... "Turn, O backsliding children, says the Lord, for I am married to you... and I will give you pastors according to my heart, which shall feed you with knowledge and understanding." Backslider! He called them then, and told them to come back. Now He calls you back. You might ask, How can I get back?... Listen. "Only acknowledge your iniquity." There is only one way back, and what is it? Confession.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What the word "pastors" means

The word translated "pastors" is not a church title. It is a working word about food, and in Jeremiah it names men who had already failed at the job:

In the Old Testament the word is raah, "to feed," and refers to those who should have helped God's people. They, like all others, had failed; they had destroyed and scattered the sheep... In the New Testament it is poimēn, which is applied to Christ Himself as the good Shepherd. The pastor is one of the gifts in the church, Ephesians 4:11. He is gifted to help the saints one by one. He enters into their trials and difficulties, and brings the word to instruct and comfort them, or to challenge and counsel them if needed.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Jeremiah traces that failure through his whole book. That is why the promise of new shepherds matters:

After speaking of the ignorance of the priests, Jeremiah adds, "The pastors also transgressed against Me, and the prophets prophesied by Baal." He tells us, "The pastors have become brutish and have not sought the Lord." ... The Lord says, "My people have been like lost sheep, and their shepherds have caused them to go astray."

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

"According to My heart"

The measure of these shepherds is God's own heart, not their skill or office. One writer links the phrase to the charge Jesus gave Peter after his failure, and to what Peter later told other leaders:

The pastors promised to Israel for the last days, who "shall feed them with knowledge and understanding" (Jer. 3:15), are described as being after God's "own heart." Compare those words with the parting charge the Great Shepherd of the sheep gave to Peter, the fallen but now "converted" son of Jonas (John 21:15-17; Luke 22:32). Compare them too with what that same Peter, as a mature apostle, later told his fellow elders in the Church (1 Peter 5:1-4).

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Feeding with knowledge and understanding

"Feed" is the test. One writer draws a sharp line between feeding and mere talk:

A pastor is one who feeds the sheep of Christ. He is not one who stands up and talks a great deal of airy stuff about the higher criticism of Scripture, and usually leads his hearers away into a mist of darkness where they cannot follow him... A teacher of that sort is certainly no pastor. The pastor that Christ gives is one who feeds the hearts of His saints with the bread and water of life.

Modernised from William J. HockingOriginal wording

Neglecting that work is no small thing:

The pastor is a gift Christ gave when He went up on high. He is placed in the body of Christ as a joint that supplies it. So he is responsible for using this gift, like a talent entrusted to him; Eph. 4:11. Woe to the pastor who does not feed!

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

When the promise is kept

One writer reads the promise as grace for a day still ahead, later than both captivities:

Nothing could be more distinct than this prediction, nor more gracious. Here we have God's grace stepping in for the whole people in the latter day. That is after the Assyrian captivity, which had already happened, and after the Babylonian one, which was still to come. After all that, God would recall His people — not part of them, but the whole of them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Behind the shepherds God gives stands the Shepherd Himself:

He foretells the day when the Lord Himself will recover His scattered people, and "gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd does his flock." Of the seed of David, the shepherd king, he tells us, One will be raised up, and in His days "Israel shall dwell safely." The believer knows this Shepherd now, and receives eternal life from Him before He returns to gather Israel.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Return — God ties the promise of good shepherds to a call to come back. The one condition is confession: "Only acknowledge your iniquity."

- Failure — Israel's own shepherds — older versions call them "pastors" — sinned, grew brutish, and led God's people astray.

- Gift — God gives what failed men could not: shepherds measured by His own heart. Christ's charge to Peter, and Peter's charge to elders, echo the same standard.

- Food — The test is feeding hearts with the bread and water of life, not talk that leaves hearers in a mist.

- Fulfilment — Writers see grace for the whole nation in a day still to come, resting on the Shepherd of David's line whom believers know already.

Jeremiah 3:16 · Darby

And it shall come to pass, when ye are multiplied in the land and become fruitful, in those days, saith Jehovah, they shall say no more, Ark of the covenant of Jehovah! neither shall it come to mind, nor shall they remember it, nor shall they visit [it]; neither shall it be done any more.

Jeremiah 3 is a plea to a people who had wandered from God. In the middle of it comes a promise about a day when Israel is back in the land and growing. The strange part is what that day will not hold. Israel's most sacred object, the ark of the covenant, will not even come to mind.

The promise belongs to a restoration still ahead

The promise reaches past captivity, and it outruns Israel's best days.

Here we have God's grace stepping in for the whole people in the latter day — after the Assyrian captivity, which had already happened, and the Babylonian one, still to come. After all that, God would recall His people — not part of them, but the whole of them. He would recall Israel. He would recall Judah. He would bring them both back into the land. He would bless them there so richly that even their ancient blessing, the ark of the covenant, would pass away. The ark was the great mark of David's faith. David made a resting-place for it on Zion, and it was lost soon after Solomon... So great would be the blessing of that day that even what David and Solomon knew would be altogether eclipsed by the still brighter glory of the whole united people. From that time they would never depart from the Lord again.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The ark vanishes from the record

The ark stood for God's presence with Israel. Scripture stops mentioning it around Jeremiah's time, and the verse may hint at how people were treating it then.

Josiah tells the Levites to put the ark in its proper place in the temple, and to stop carrying it on their shoulders. That is the last historical mention of the ark in Scripture. From Jer. 3:16 it would almost appear that people had turned it into a showy display, and that the Levites may have carried it in procession through the streets of Jerusalem. It is never heard of again, and probably perished when the Babylonians burned the temple.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Some have said Jeremiah hid the ark away for a future day. One writer finds that unlikely, and points to this verse.

That it disappeared is certain. That he hid it, to come out at a future day, we think most unlikely, with the words of his prophecy (Jer. 3:16) before us... A stone took its place in the rebuilt temple, and Ezekiel's temple of the future never mentions it. Jeremiah has told us that it will not be needed, and we can all understand why. The ark was the symbol of the Divine presence, and God needs no symbol when He Himself is there.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

A symbol retires when the reality arrives

This is no downgrade. The picture gives way to the Person it pictured.

The ark had the greatest significance in Israel when it was made. Yet it was only a symbol of Christ. The symbol must vanish away, while the One it speaks of remains for ever in all the excellence of His beauty and glory.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The temple Ezekiel describes for that age has no ark in it.

In the holiest place there is no sign and no ark needed: Jehovah fills it alone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Jerusalem itself becomes the throne

The next verse names what replaces the ark: Jerusalem becomes the throne of the LORD, and the nations gather to it. Three things arrive together there, and history has not yet seen them together.

Some events have looked like the fulfilment of many of the prophecies about their restoration — for example, the return of the people from Babylon. But God has given His own marks. He has tied circumstances together that have never yet come true, as in this passage: "All the nations shall be gathered unto it."... In a word, we see three things happening together which surely have not yet happened at the same time: Jerusalem the throne of Jehovah; Judah and Israel united; and the nations assembled to the throne of God. When the church began, Israel was scattered. When Israel returned from Babylon, there was neither church nor gathering of nations.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why this matters now

The verse has a present edge. It settles the question of chasing after sacred objects. The writer quotes an older translation here: where the ESV has "or missed," it reads "neither shall they visit it."

He sees the living glory and covenant coming in Christ with surpassing splendour, and so he says, "Neither shall they remember it, neither shall they visit it!" A greater glory outshines it. This helps those who cling to the living Lord today. Many are trapped in superstition and darkness by vague and mysterious teaching about "The Ark," and I have met some of them in great distress of mind. We have the living Christ, and we are to follow Him.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Outshone. The sign that once marked God's presence is not destroyed. The glory it pointed to has come, and it outshines the sign.

- Outgrown. Israel's future blessing goes far beyond the days of David and Solomon. Their finest treasure will not even come to mind.

- Untraceable. The ark's story stops in Jeremiah's day. Guesses about a hidden ark run against the very verse that says it will never be needed again.

- Unnecessary. Ezekiel's temple of the future has no ark: no symbol of God's presence is needed when God Himself is there.

- Unfulfilled. A throne at Jerusalem, Judah and Israel together, and all nations gathered — these three have never yet happened at once. The promise still stands open.

Jeremiah 3:17 · Darby

At that time they shall call Jerusalem the throne of Jehovah; and all the nations shall be gathered unto it, to the name of Jehovah, to Jerusalem; and they shall no more walk after the stubbornness of their evil heart.

Jeremiah looks ahead to a day when Jerusalem carries God's throne. The promise raises two hard questions. What does it mean to call a city the throne of the Lord? And when has anything like this ever happened?

Government, Not the Gospel

The title given to Jerusalem is a title of rule. One writer will not soften it into something spiritual and present. He uses an older translation that prints God's name as "Jehovah"; the ESV has "the LORD".

Here the prophet speaks of a state that goes beyond everything known under their best kings. Is it the gospel, or what we now know under Christianity? There is not the slightest resemblance. "At that time they shall call Jerusalem the throne of Jehovah." Now that is not the gospel. The gospel is not the throne of Jehovah. The throne of Jehovah means governmental power. It is put forth over the whole earth, according to His name, Jehovah. There are to be no idols. There are to be no rivals. The name of Jehovah is to be the one universal name owned and honoured over the whole earth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Three Marks That Have Never Yet Met

Some say this came true when the exiles returned from Babylon. Others say it pictures the church. One commentator answers both.

Certain early signs have looked like the fulfilment of many prophecies about their restoration. The return of the people from Babylon is one. But God has given His own marks. He has linked circumstances together which have never yet come true. In this passage, "all nations shall gather to it." That did not take place at the return from Babylon. But you will reply, It is the church. No. We see three things happening together which have not yet happened at the same time: Jerusalem the throne of Jehovah; Judah and Israel united; and the nations assembled to the throne of God. When the church was founded, Israel was dispersed. When Israel returned from Babylon, there was neither church nor gathering of nations.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

From Ark to City

The ark was the gold-covered chest in Israel's sanctuary. It was God's throne among His people, and it is gone. One writer shows what this verse puts in its place — and what changes in the people themselves.

The literal ark has passed away, as Jeremiah tells us, and it will never return. But instead of that throne of His of old, a far greater grace has declared that Jerusalem itself "shall be called the throne of the LORD, and all nations shall gather to it... and they shall no more stubbornly follow their own evil heart."

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

When the Throne Is Taken

The verse opens with "At that time." Commentators place that time after judgment has cleared the ground.

Besides the warrior-judgment, there is a judgment from the seat of authority. It comes when Christ has destroyed the beast and Antichrist and has taken the throne of Jehovah on the earth at Jerusalem. For Jerusalem is to be called the throne of Jehovah.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

One Centre, Every Nation

The same writer names who has tried to build a worldwide rule. He also shows that Christ's kingdom will not be limited to the earth.

"All nations shall gather to it." The papacy has tried under the gospel to set up a universal spiritual monarchy. That will really be done by the only One entitled to it, the Lord Jesus. He will have this kingdom upon the earth, Jerusalem His centre, and all the nations His sphere. At the same time He will have the heavens, and the new Jerusalem will be the capital.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Mercy Wide Enough for a Guilty City

The promise is startling because of who receives it. God names a guilty city as His throne.

Jerusalem then is to be the throne of Jehovah. Suppose it is worthy of God, suitable to His grace, and due to His Son, that He should show mercy to the vilest of sinners now. Then will it take from His glory, or lessen His grace, if He pours out His mercy over the earth? Will it, if He yet makes that guilty city a holy city, not in word only, but in deed and in truth? The time shall come when He who saw and wept over its growing wickedness will be its unhindered and eternal blessing, so that the nations may be blessed too.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Throne — the phrase means real government. God rules the earth under His own name, with no idols and no rivals.

- Replacement — the ark, God's old throne among Israel, is gone for good. Grace answers that loss and names the whole city His throne.

- Gathering — the reach then runs outward. Jerusalem is His centre, all the nations His sphere, and the new Jerusalem the capital above.

- Timing — three things must meet at once: the throne, Judah and Israel united, and the nations gathered. They never have, so the promise still stands unfulfilled.

- Mercy — the city named as God's throne is the guilty one He wept over. The same grace will make that city holy in deed and truth, and its people will no longer follow their own evil heart.

Jeremiah 3:18 · Darby

In those days the house of Judah shall walk with the house of Israel; and they shall come together out of the land of the north, to the land which I caused your fathers to inherit.

God speaks this promise to a people He is about to judge. It looks past their ruin to a day when the two long-divided halves of the nation come home together. When does this happen? Who comes back? Did the return from Babylon already settle it?

Grace speaking after judgment

The chapter exposes what Israel and Judah have done. Yet it moves toward recovery, not ruin. One writer explains why Judah shares a promise spoken to Israel.

Jeremiah 3 announces that God will restore Israel out of His own sovereign goodness. It promises the blessing of the last days, when they return to Him... Now that judgment has fallen on Israel, God can let His heart flow out in the testimony of grace. This must give a place to Judah as well, since the two are to be united.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Three things that have never yet happened at once

Some think the verse has already come true — in the return from Babylon, or in the church. One writer answers by pointing to the marks God attached to the promise.

Some events have looked like the fulfilment of many prophecies about their restoration — for example, the return of the people from Babylon. But God has given His own marks. He has linked circumstances together that have never yet come true... In a word, we see three things happening together, and they have never yet happened at the same time: Jerusalem the throne of Jehovah; Judah and Israel united; and the nations gathered to the throne of God. When the church began, Israel lay scattered. When Israel returned from Babylon, there was no church and no gathering of nations.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Not a fragment but the whole people

The verse names two houses, and that detail decides its scope. One writer measures both how many come back and how great the blessing will be.

Here we plainly have God's grace stepping in for the whole people in the latter day. It comes after the Assyrian captivity, which had already happened, and after the Babylonian one, which was still to come. After all that, God would recall His people — not part of them, but the whole of them. He would recall Israel and recall Judah. He would bring them both back into the land, and bless them there... So great would be the blessing of the latter day that the brighter glory of the whole united people would eclipse even what they knew under David and Solomon. From that time they would never depart from the Lord again.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why "the land of the north"

The ten tribes went north as captives long before Jeremiah wrote. Where they are now is unknown to us, but not to God.

One hundred years before, the house of Israel had gone northward as captives. The Lord knew where they lived and sent them this message of mercy. He knows today where the house of Israel is — the ten tribes. At some future time He will make good the gracious offer given here, and they will return... Israel will be converted. All the nations will be gathered to the Name of Jehovah; the house of Judah with the house of Israel will be reunited. That will be when the King, our ever blessed Lord, comes back.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The land held as a gift, not a permit

The verse ends by calling the land a heritage God gave to their fathers. That word matters. The group that came back from Babylon held the land on very different terms.

Very few did return. Most of the nation stayed in Babylon and in the other countries where they were scattered. The ten tribes never returned at all. A second temple did go up, but no ark of the covenant stood in its holy of holies. There was no glory to mark the presence of Him who once dwelt between the cherubim. The restored captives held the land again, but not as an unconditional gift from God — only by permission of their Gentile masters.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Is any of it visible now?

Commentators differ on whether present-day events touch this verse. One writer reads the modern return of Jewish people to the land as an early stage of it, while noting the condition in which they arrive.

What does the Word of God prophesy about the last days? It tells us that the Jews will return to their own land in unbelief... This prophecy is being fulfilled before our eyes. The Jewish people were scattered among the nations for nearly two thousand years. Now they are coming back to their own land in large numbers. Only a little under 50,000 came back in the times of Ezra and Nehemiah.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace — judgment is not the last word; once sentence falls, God's heart opens toward the very people He judges.

- Union — the promise reaches Judah as well as Israel, because the two are to be one people again.

- All — the promise covers the whole people, not a returning fragment. God recalls Israel and Judah together.

- North — the ten tribes vanished northward and are lost to us, not to God, who will bring them out at the King's return.

- Heritage — the land is theirs as God's own gift, not on loan from foreign rulers. Nothing since Babylon has matched that.

Jeremiah 3:19 · Darby

And as for me, I said, How shall I put thee among the children, and give thee the pleasant land, the goodly inheritance of the hosts of the nations? And I said, Thou shalt call me, My father; and shalt not turn away from following me.

Jeremiah 3 is full of charges against a faithless people. Then God speaks like a father working out how to keep a wayward child in the family — and He answers His own question with a name.

Grace speaking after judgment

One writer sums up the chapter as a promise of restoration resting on God's goodness alone, and says why grace can speak here at all:

Jeremiah 3 proclaims the restoration of Israel by sovereign goodness, and the blessing of the last days when they return to God. Notice only this. Before the pleading with Israel over their folly, the Lord first points out that there was no seeking of Himself, no longing after Him: neither people nor priests said, "Where is the LORD?" Since judgment falls on Israel, God can let His heart flow out in the testimony of grace.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The chapter opens with a marriage broken by desertion. What God does next has no human parallel:

God is nowhere more Himself than in His tender mercy to His fallen people. A man could not take back a wife who had left him for another. "Israel had committed adultery with many lovers: yet return again to me, says the LORD."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the question had to be asked

The writers quoted here use an older translation, which reads the first half of the verse as a question — "How shall I put you among the children, and give you a pleasant land?" — and the second half as a promise: "You shall call me, my Father, and shall not depart from me." God had given the land once already, and it had gone wrong. That is what makes the question so pointed:

That land was made a fit place to live for the chosen people, for it was a good land, flowing with milk and honey. But they did not make it a fit place for God… When Israel failed and Canaan became an abomination, God was not defeated… Here are these two things again — the sons of men brought into relationship with God, and the habitable part of His earth. But the question is asked: how could God bring these wayward men of Israel, how could He bring any of the wayward sons of men, to answer His thoughts in a place where He could dwell with them?

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

The answer God gives Himself: a name

God had sent prophets and messengers, and nothing held. The second half of the verse names what was still missing:

Israel's sad history of backsliding proved beyond question that if God was to secure men for Himself, something other than the prophetic word, or even the ministry of angels, was needed. God knew this from the beginning, and gleams of light about it broke out here and there in those earlier fruitless days, as in His lament over Israel's continual treachery. This was what God held in reserve until the fullness of the times had come. He would reveal Himself as Father, and by this revelation secure a true and steadfast response.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

A word still waiting for the nation

Commentators read this promise as still future, waiting on a King:

The call that follows — to return and confess to the One who is married to them — looks on to a future day. Then a greater glory will outshine the ark of the covenant of the LORD, and the true King will reign… Then, in a national sense, Israel will call Him "My Father", and "not turn away from following Him". This has never yet taken place, as we know. It supposes the return of our Lord Jesus Christ to Israel as David's greater Son.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Israel's sonship here belongs to a nation, and writers mark the difference:

We must not confuse the adoption of Israel with what we know in Christianity… As a nation Israel could indeed be called God's son, and, in relation to the nations of the earth, His firstborn… Still, this is completely different in character from Christian adoption.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

The name that holds a wanderer

The verse ends with a promise about staying, not only about coming back:

"You shall call Me, My Father, and shall not depart from Me," was God's word to a backsliding people in ancient days. It seems to us that this name, Abba, is what will keep us from wandering and preserve us from worry. In the knowledge of His perfect love and care for us we shall rest.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Summary

- Question. God Himself raises the problem. How can He set a faithless people among His children and give them a good land?

- Difficulty. He gave the land once, and they defiled it. The question is not property but how wayward people can live where God dwells with them.

- Answer. Prophets and messengers were not enough. God gives a name instead: He makes Himself known as Father, and that secures a lasting response.

- Reach. For Israel the words still wait on a coming day. The nation will call Him "My Father" — a place writers keep distinct from Christian adoption.

- Result. Knowing Him as Father is what keeps a wanderer from leaving again.

Jeremiah 3:20 · Darby

Surely [as] a woman treacherously departeth from her companion, so have ye dealt treacherously with me, O house of Israel, saith Jehovah.

The verse names Israel's sin with the sharpest picture available: a marriage betrayed. In the verse before, God speaks of setting His people among His children and hearing them call Him Father. Why does He speak of desertion in the same breath?

The marriage bond behind the charge

The word "treacherous" only bites because a real bond existed. Commentators note that Scripture treats God's tie to Israel as a marriage, and grades her sin by that standard.

The sad truth is that Israel was married to Jehovah, as the prophets remind the people (Isaiah 54; Jeremiah 3). So her unfaithfulness is branded as adultery, not as prostitution like the Babylon of the New Testament (so in Hosea 3 and elsewhere). Yet in time His grace may deal with Israel not as a guilty widow, but as a woman forsaken and a wife of youth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That bond explains the tone of the whole passage. God is not just offended at bad behaviour. Someone else has taken His place as husband.

The prophets say much about Israel's conduct as a wife, and about Jehovah's jealousy on that score. Her unfaithfulness is now plain. She has broken her vows. She has left her Husband, the Holy One of Israel, and He has poured out His burning jealousy on the faithless nation. He is a jealous God, and cannot bear the thought that the heart He claims as His own should be given to another.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

What the departure was

Leaving a husband means going somewhere else. One writer traces every trouble Israel had back to that one move, and then finds the same drift in a church long after.

Again and again Jehovah reminds His people, Israel, of a sad fact. All their trouble came from turning away from Him. He was their ALL, but they looked for comfort elsewhere. "They have forsaken Me, the fountain of living waters," He said. It was the same with God's people of old. Later John had to write of the assembly at Ephesus, where Paul worked so long and so faithfully: "You have abandoned the love you had at first" (Revelation 2:4).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Father's longing in verse 19

Verse 20 answers God's own words in verse 19. There He speaks of setting them among His children and hearing them say "My Father." One writer sees in that a gleam of what God kept in reserve.

God knew what was needed from the beginning. Gleams of light broke out here and there in those former, ineffective days. One came in His lament over Israel's continual treachery: "And I thought you would call me, My Father, and would not turn from following me" (Jeremiah 3:19). This was what God held in reserve until the fullness of the times came. He would reveal Himself as Father, and by that revelation secure a true and steady response in the hearts of men.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

Mercy that goes past what law allows

Human law had no way back for a wife who had left. God's appeal in this chapter breaks that rule. One writer says His character shows most at that very point.

God, however, is nowhere more Himself than in His tender mercy to His fallen people. A man could not take back the wife who had deserted him for another. "Israel had committed fornication with many lovers: yet return again to Me, says the Lord." He points out their frequent and shameless unfaithfulness, while they still call Him the father and guide of their youth. But whatever they said, they kept on doing evil. Israel's uncleanness was well known, and God had called her back in vain. Judah was even more treacherous. She despised the warning, though she knew better, and sinned more boldly still.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The line quoted there from Jeremiah 3:1 follows an older translation, not the ESV.

The day the desertion ends

The nation has not yet made the confession that follows in the chapter. Writers place it in the future, when Israel will say the words of verse 19.

The call that follows — to return and confess to the One who is married to them — looks on to a future day. Then a greater glory will outshine the ark of the covenant of the LORD. The true King will reign, and "they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the LORD." He will be truly exalted, and Israel as a nation will call Him "My Father" and "not turn away from following Him" (vv. 14-19). This has never yet taken place, as we know.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Bond. Israel was married to Jehovah, so Scripture calls her sin adultery, not simple disobedience.

- Betrayal. He was her all; the treachery was looking elsewhere for what only He could give.

- Warning. Ephesus drifted the same way: leaving first love is the same move.

- Mercy. No human husband could take back such a wife; God says "return," and is never more Himself than there.

- Homecoming. One day Israel will say the Father-name of verse 19, and will turn away no more.

Jeremiah 3:21 · Darby

A voice is heard upon the heights, the weeping supplications of the children of Israel; for they have perverted their way, they have forgotten Jehovah their God.

Jeremiah has been pleading with a people who turned away from God. Now a cry comes back from the very hills where they went wrong — and the question is what God does with such tears.

The hills where they sinned

The bare heights are not neutral ground. Earlier in the chapter the prophet describes what Israel did on those same hills. He also records what God thought of a return that was only for show.

The LORD said to me in the days of King Josiah, "Have you seen what she did, that faithless one, Israel, how she went up on every high hill and under every green tree, and there played the whore?" … "Yet for all this her treacherous sister Judah did not return to me with her whole heart, but in pretense, declares the LORD" (Jer. 3:6, 10). God would rather have what is real, even when our souls are far from Him, than something false — a nearness we claim but are not in. … The Lord will not have anything but what is real.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Weeping before healing

The weeping and pleading are not the restoration itself. They are the state God works in people just before He restores them. The call that answers this cry comes next.

Verses sixteen to twenty show how God will recover and restore Israel in time to come. Jeremiah 3:21 shows the moral state that comes before restoration — that is, weeping and prayer. Then comes another loving call: "Return, O faithless sons; I will heal your faithlessness." Who could resist such an appeal? Many a time a poor soul says, How can I get back, what must I go through to get back? Look at this verse … and note the result of the call: "Behold, we come to you, for you are the LORD our God." Behold, we come. It is done.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

"They have perverted their way"

The verse gives a cause for the tears: the people now feel what they have done. A passage in Hosea shows the same order. First the conscience wakes up. Then comes the promise of healing.

Look at the way the conscience is at work there. They feel all that they had sought after instead of God. They see how they had turned to the schemes of this world instead of the LORD. Afterwards, in verse 4, you get God's reply: "I will heal their apostasy; I will love them freely, for my anger has turned from them." But before that comes the sense of where they are. That is the true work of God in the conscience, and it is always so.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

"They have forgotten the LORD their God"

Forgetting God is the root the verse names, and it happens quietly. A heart can be far gone before anything visible changes.

The history of Israel proves that the heart may turn away from God long before He withdraws His blessings. Israel forgot the Lord, and how long it was before God came in judgment to show what their state was!

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A repentance still ahead

The closing part of the chapter looks ahead. The cry it describes is a repentance Israel has not yet made.

Verses 19–25. These verses predict and anticipate what the true repentance of the people will one day be. There will be weeping and pleading. They will acknowledge that true salvation is in the Lord. They will confess their sins and their disobedience.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The sorrow itself is not the people's own work. Grace produces it.

The end of the chapter describes at length, and very movingly, the spirit that grace will produce in Israel when God brings them back. It also describes how the Lord will receive them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Forgetting — the trouble starts here. The heart can drift from God long before He takes anything away, so the ruin stays hidden for a long time.

- Perverting — forgetting shows itself in a twisted path, in what people chase instead of God. When they finally feel where they are, that is God's own work in the conscience.

- Weeping — the cry from the hills is the state that comes just before restoration. God accepts no substitute for it. He wants what is real, not a return "in pretense."

- Returning — the call answers the cry at once. God offers healing before anything is repaired, and the answer comes back: "Behold, we come to you."

- Grace — the tears are not the price of mercy but its fruit. This is the spirit grace produces in a people God is bringing back, and a repentance still ahead of them.

Jeremiah 3:22 · Darby

-- Return, backsliding children; I will heal your backslidings. ... Behold, we come unto thee; for thou art Jehovah our God.

In Jeremiah 3 God pleads with a people who had walked away from Him and given themselves to idols. Here that plea reaches its warmest point: one verse holds an invitation, a promise of healing, and the people's answer. Two questions decide everything. What does it cost to come back, and who does the healing?

Grace at the bottom

The invitation does not wait for the people to improve. It comes at the end of a chapter of charges.

I need not dwell on the bitter charges of the prophet. The Jews did a double evil. They forsook the Lord, the only source of living waters, and turned instead to cisterns that could hold no water, fleeing to idolatry and all its corrupting influences. But in Jeremiah 3 we have the Lord pleading with them. He shows them that Judah would turn out no better than Israel, bad as Israel had been. Judah had held out for a time and gave fair promises under Josiah. The crisis would surely come; but when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The way back is shorter than we think

Many people who have drifted assume there is a long process to endure before God will have them again. The second half of the verse answers that fear, because the return and the arrival are the same moment.

Jeremiah 3:21 shows the moral state that comes before restoration — weeping and prayer. Then comes another loving call. "Return, you backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings." Who could resist such an appeal? Many a time a poor soul says, How can I get back? What must I go through to get back? Look at this verse... and note the result of the call: "Behold, we come to you; for you are the Lord our God." Behold, we come. It is done. The soul that heeds the call to return says, "We come to you; you are the Lord our God."

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

He heals; He is not merely willing to

The promise is "I will heal" — the work belongs to God. Writers press this against any idea that a wanderer engineers his own recovery.

Whether we have backslidden openly or in heart, every backslider will be restored, though it may not be until a deathbed. And all restoration begins with the Lord. The wandering sheep would never return if the Lord in His grace did not go after His sheep. David says, "He restores my soul." Naomi says, "The Lord has brought me home again."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The tie God will not cut

Why does He still call them "children"? Their behaviour has not cut the tie on His side.

Remember that the Lord never gives His people up, whatever their state or condition. When Israel seemed wholly given over to idolatry, Jeremiah cried, "Turn, O backsliding children, says the Lord; for I am married to you"... No! The Lord never forgets His people, however grievously they may have sinned. The history of Peter, on the sad night when he denied his Lord, proclaims this truth like a trumpet. This is certain. So it is very clear that all who share the Lord's heart for His people will keep His own attitude of unquenchable affection.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

A repentance still ahead

Some read the people's answer as prophecy — words Israel has not yet spoken, but will.

Verses 19-25. What the future true repentance of the people will be is here predicted and anticipated. There will be weeping and supplications. They will acknowledge that true salvation is in the Lord. They will confess their sins and their disobedience.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What happens if the call is ignored

Jeremiah himself traces the alternative. Drifting that is not checked hardens into a settled condition.

Unjudged sin leads to graver evil. Move on to the eighth chapter, where the Lord asks, "Why then has this people of Jerusalem turned away in perpetual backsliding? They hold fast to deceit, they refuse to return" (Jer. 8:5). If I do not heed His word and return, I shall get into this awful condition of perpetual backsliding.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The one thing worse than falling

The verse leaves no room for the hesitation that says the door has closed.

If someone who has backslidden or fallen reads these lines, we would earnestly urge him to return to Jesus at once. "Return, you backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings." What is the response to this moving appeal? "Behold, we come to You; for You are the Lord our God."... The love of the heart of Jesus knows no change. We change, but He is "the same yesterday, today, and forever," and He delights to be trusted... It is sad to fall, to err, to backslide. It is sadder still, once we have done so, to distrust the love of Jesus or His gracious readiness to take us to His heart again.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Bottom — The call comes after every charge. When a person has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

- Call — He still calls wanderers children. He never gives His people up, whatever their state.

- Heal — The promise is His own act; the straying sheep would never return if the Lord did not go after it.

- Come — The answer "Behold, we come to You" is the whole journey home. It is done.

- Delay — Refuse the call, and drifting hardens into perpetual backsliding. Sadder than falling is doubting His readiness to receive you back.

Jeremiah 3:23 · Darby

Truly in vain [is salvation looked for] from the hills, [and] the multitude of mountains; truly in Jehovah our God is the salvation of Israel.

In Jeremiah 3, God pleads with a nation that has abandoned Him. Verse 23 is the answer He puts in their mouths. It is a confession with two halves: the hills were worthless, and the LORD alone saves.

Who Is Speaking in This Verse

These words are not God's accusation. They are the people's own admission, and the prophet voices it for them. One writer sets the closing verses in that frame. He also gives a hard verdict on the religious reform under King Josiah, then under way in Jeremiah's day.

The end of the chapter dwells, in a very moving way, on the spirit that grace will produce in Israel when God brings them back. It also dwells on the way the Lord will receive them. In verses 23-25 the prophet confesses the people's condition at the time in which he spoke. This chapter gives us the solemn revelation that, as far as the people were concerned, the reform under Josiah was only hypocrisy.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What "the Hills" Were

The hills here are not scenery. The ESV calls what went on there "the orgies on the mountains". They were the sites of Israel's idol worship, spread across the whole country.

God had rescued them from Egypt, and they had promised, at Sinai, not to transgress. Sadly, they set up the golden calf before the law even reached the camp. The long list of later idolatries told how they had broken the covenant. "High places" for idol worship had dotted the whole land. In the shade of every green tree they practised the detestable rites of the pagan nations. Both spiritually and literally, these unholy and unclean rites deserved the name of prostitution that the prophets so often give them. What could God do with such a nation but put them away?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Such worship rarely announces itself as idolatry. It starts with something that still carries God's name.

At first they claimed the high places were for the worship of God. But this very soon turned into the worship of idols. In the same way, we can crave high recognition from people in our outward worship of God. That desire very easily becomes idolatry in all but name. Satan's counterfeit will displace God and take His place.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Why a Hill Cannot Save

Mountains look unshakeable. Older translations put this verse as salvation hoped for in vain from the hills. Psalm 121 opens with the same need: "From where does my help come?" One writer pictures the man who asks it.

Mountains surround him, and they look strong, imposing, and immovable. In the same way, some people in the world seem firmly established in power, and beyond the reach of an enemy. But can we trust in any fellow creature? … Realising his need of help, and that the help of man is in vain, the godly man turns from the creature to the Creator.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Israel had already tried this. The result was worse than disappointment.

The mountains had once been Israel's trust. In their day of pride they had leaned upon the creature more than the Creator. But that help had only been a pitfall of destruction to them. They had stumbled and fallen, and been trapped and broken. And now they are waking from the long and dishonoured sleep of their night of blindness. They turn to seek Israel's Saviour in the only Maker of heaven and earth.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

A Confession Still Ahead

Commentators read the second half of the verse — salvation in the LORD — as a prophecy. It points to a repentance Israel has not yet made. One writer traces the chapter forward to the day the King returns.

This has never yet taken place, as we know. It supposes the return of our Lord Jesus Christ to Israel as David's greater Son. Their conscience will be truly reached then, and they will return to the One they had forsaken and forgotten. "Behold, we come to you, for you are the LORD our God", they say (v. 22). They confess their sin, owning that the salvation of Israel is in Him alone (v. 23).

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The Grace That Draws the Confession Out

This confession does not come from threats. It comes when God's grace meets people at their lowest.

In Jeremiah 3 we have the Lord pleading with them. He shows them that, bad as Israel might have been, Judah would turn out no better. Judah had held out for a time, and gave fair promises under Josiah. The crisis would surely come; but when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- The hills deceived. They were real places of idol worship, not innocent high ground.

- The hills looked solid. Mountains seem strong, imposing and immovable. To lean on them is to lean on the creature, not the Creator.

- The hills destroyed. What Israel leaned on in their pride became a pitfall. They stumbled, fell, and it broke them.

- The LORD saves. Waking from their blindness, they turn to Israel's Saviour, the only Maker of heaven and earth. Salvation is in Him alone.

- Grace speaks first. God Himself supplies this confession. When a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Jeremiah 3:24 · Darby

But shame hath devoured the labour of our fathers from our youth; their flocks and their herds, their sons and their daughters.

Jeremiah 3 ends in confession, and this verse is its heart: a shameful thing has eaten up all that the fathers worked for. So what was that shameful thing, why does the reckoning reach back to their youth, and who is speaking here?

The prophet speaking for the people

These are not the people's own words at the time. The prophet speaks the confession for them.

The end of the chapter dwells, in a very moving way, on the spirit that grace will produce in Israel when God brings them back. It also dwells on how the Lord will receive them. In verses 23-25 the prophet confesses the people's condition at the time when he spoke.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

"The shameful thing"

The devourer is never named. The verse simply calls it a shame; older translations read, "shame has devoured the labour of our fathers." That word swap has a history in Israel. One writer traces it in names from Saul's family, where "shame" took the place of the idol's name, Baal.

Ishbosheth means "man of shame." People might easily suppose that name came from his history, rather than being his original one. We know from Chronicles that his original name was Esh-baal. We have a similar change in Jonathan's son Meribbaal, changed into Mephibosheth. In Hosea 9:10 Baal himself is called "that shame." There is no real doubt that this sense of the shameful character of idolatry led to these changes.

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

What the idol costs

The idol did not just offend God. It ate what generations had built. One writer comments on a similar complaint in Lamentations: Judah now had to pay for its own water and wood. He counts up what leaving God really costs.

It may seem that there is much to gain by taking your own way and putting the fear of God out of mind. Satan will suggest, too, that it costs too much to live for God. He offers tempting bait to the unhappy heart that has begun to crave other things. But in the end it only proves that disobedience to God is a costly indulgence — an unholy luxury that nobody can really afford... Departure from God is the most foolish and worst investment any child of grace ever made.

Modernised from H. A. IronsideOriginal wording

"From our youth" — and their fathers too

The confession reaches across generations. The fathers worked, and the loss has run on "from our youth." In Lamentations the people say the same thing: their fathers sinned, and they carry it. One writer shows what is wrong with using that as a complaint.

For if fathers and children are alike sinful, the punishment is due either way — for the fathers or for the children. If God judges, it must come. How much better, then, to repent than to complain and murmur! That only makes the evil worse and ensures vengeance on such growing rebellion against God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A confession still ahead of them

Israel has not yet made this confession. One writer places it in a day still ahead.

The call that follows, to return and confess to the One who is married to them, looks on to a future day... Their conscience will be truly reached then, and they will return to the One they had forsaken and forgotten.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The same account, in other currency

An idol need not carry a foreign name to devour what a life has gathered. The warning is carried straight over to readers who would never bow to a carved image.

Such is the result of departure from God, a sorrowful result that is not limited to God's ancient people, Israel. If we get away from the Lord and seek the things of this present world, we expose ourselves to the enemy. Someone might say, surely Christians would not choose new gods? But the apostle John writes to us, "Little children, keep yourselves from idols" (1 John 5:21). Everything that would challenge Christ's right to fill the heart is an idol!

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Shame named. The devourer is idolatry. Scripture gives it the name it deserves: in Hosea, Baal himself is called "that shame." Israel even reworked personal names to avoid honouring him.

- Shame devours. What the idol promised to give, it ate instead — the fathers' labour, and the next generation with it. Disobedience is a luxury nobody can afford.

- Shame inherited. The loss runs from the fathers down through "our youth." Fathers and children are alike guilty, so judgment is due either way. Repenting beats complaining.

- Shame confessed. The prophet speaks the confession before the people ever feel it. The chapter shows the spirit grace will produce in them when God brings them back.

- Shame answered. For Israel, that return is still future. And any heart that lets something else hold Christ's place owes the same account.

Jeremiah 3:25 · Darby

We lie down in our shame, and our confusion covereth us; for we have sinned against Jehovah our God, we and our fathers, from our youth even unto this day, and have not hearkened to the voice of Jehovah our God.

The chapter does not end with God speaking. It ends with the people speaking — a confession of shame that covers their whole history. Is such shame a mark of repentance, or only a guilty conscience? And when are these words spoken?

The prophet's confession for the people

These closing words are not a report of what Israel said in Jeremiah's day. The prophet makes this confession on their behalf, in a chapter about restoration.

Jeremiah 3 gives details of how Israel and Judah behaved. It proclaims the restoration of Israel by God's sovereign goodness, and the blessing of the last days when they return to God. The end of the chapter dwells, in a deeply moving way, on the spirit that grace will produce in Israel when God brings them back, and on the way the Lord will receive them. It is in this chapter that we have the solemn revelation that, as far as the people were concerned, the reformation under Josiah was only hypocrisy. In verses 23-25 the prophet confesses the people's condition at the time in which he spoke.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Grace arrives at the lowest point

This confession comes at the chapter's lowest point. That is where God's kindness appears.

In Jeremiah 3 we have a pleading of the Lord with them. He shows them that Israel may have been bad, but Judah would turn out no better. Judah had held out for a time and made fair promises under king Josiah. The crisis would surely come. But when a man has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A confession still ahead

Earlier in the chapter God calls the people to return. Writers read the answer that follows, including this admission of shame, as still future.

The call which follows tells them to return and confess to the One who is married to them. It looks on to a future day… This has never yet taken place, as we know. It supposes the return of our Lord Jesus Christ to Israel as David's greater Son. Their conscience will be truly reached then, and they will return to the One they had forsaken and forgotten. "Behold we come to You", they say, "for You are the LORD our God" (v. 22). They confess their sin, owning that the salvation of Israel is in Him alone (v. 23).

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

"We and our fathers"

The confession does not stop at personal failure. It reaches back through generations — "we and our fathers." A faithful few make the same admission in the same order in Jeremiah's Lamentations.

Here it is the confession of the remnant. First they confess their own sins. Then they add, "Our fathers sinned, and are no more; and we bear their iniquities" (Lamentations 5:7). Even in the days of Jeremiah there was a godly remnant, and the prophet speaks for them. There will be others like them in the last days. They will cry to God while they suffer, as the nation suffers, before the Lord comes to act for them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Shame alone is not repentance

Lying down in shame sounds like the deepest sorrow. But shame by itself can drive a person away from God rather than back to Him.

This is no proof of conversion. It is only the main proof that man has got into a bad conscience, and cannot get out of it… But do not mistake this for repentance. Shame merely drives them to hide from, and excuse themselves to, God. And so with us: as long as the shame of sin lasts, we try to hide it and get away from it. But it only drives us farther and farther from God. It is not a conscience taught by God, because we care more about the shame before men than about the sinfulness before God… our sense of the guilt of sin should always be deeper than our sense of its shame.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where the shame is meant to lead

The shame here is spoken to God, out loud, with nothing hidden. That changes everything.

Truth may cover our faces with "shame and confusion" as we feel our shortcomings deeply. But grace restores the paths, and restores souls to walk in them. "If we confess our sins, God is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." This is the only true place for a wounded conscience to stand. Here, and here alone, we gain a complete victory over all our sad failures. It happens when we confess all our sins and shortcomings in full, and cast ourselves on the boundless grace of our God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Grace speaks first. The prophet makes this confession for the people, in a chapter that proclaims restoration by God's own goodness.

- Grace waits for the bottom. Outward reform under king Josiah promised much and failed. When a person has sunk to the lowest, God appears in His grace.

- Grace produces the confession. The shame is the spirit grace creates in a people brought back, not the price they pay to be brought back.

- Grace reaches the whole record. The confession owns present sin first, then the fathers' — a whole history admitted, not one incident.

- Grace, not shame, restores. Shame by itself only drives us into hiding. Pour it out to God in confession, and He forgives and cleanses.

Jeremiah 4:1 · Darby

If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith Jehovah, return unto me; and if thou wilt put away thine abominations out of my sight, then shalt thou not be a wanderer;

God is still pleading with a people who had drifted into idolatry. His call comes with a condition: a return that stops short of God Himself is no return at all. Is it enough to drop the sin, or must the heart travel all the way home?

The Destination, Not Just the Direction

The chapter picks up an argument running through the two chapters before it, and settles where the turning must end.

Jeremiah 4 takes up again the subject of chapters 2 and 3. Applying it at that time to the people, it tells them that if they return, it must be to the Lord Himself. Neither forms nor half-measures would be of any use.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same weight falls on one word: "Me." God wants the person behind the religious habits, not the habits.

The pathway of restoration is a return to Himself, not to outward observances. Nothing short of that will do. As for His people — blessed be His Name — our God is satisfied with nothing less than their heart. And this is not about what they can be to Him, but about what He can be for them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The Blesser Before the Blessing

Israel had its own reasons for wanting God back: greatness, rescue, blessing. The repeated call sorts out what they are invited to.

Let them return to Himself, putting away the abominations that had been a snare to them. If they returned in that way, they would be established as a nation, and widespread blessing would reach the nations around them. Let them return to the Lord, not to national greatness, but to the Lord their God, and the other would follow. Let them "Return to Me" — not to national salvation, but to their Saviour God; then all else would come right. Let them "RETURN TO ME" — not to fullness of blessing, but to the Blesser Himself; overflowing blessing would follow.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Abominations Put Away

The word translated "detestable things" or "abominations" is not vague. Across Scripture it points at one thing in particular.

Committing abomination is a frequent expression in the Scriptures for idolatry (see Jer. 4:1; Dan. 9:27; Matt. 24:15).

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

So the return has a hard edge. The idols must go, and putting them away belongs to the return itself.

A return must be a return to Him, the Lord; anything less is not enough. Their abominations must be judged and put away. Every return of backsliders must happen the same way. It is a true return to the Lord, with confession of sin, self-judgment, and turning from evil.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Danger of Stopping Halfway

The verse allows for a journey that begins and never arrives. That partial movement is the real trap, because it feels like progress. The writers quoted here use an older translation of the line: "If you will return, return to Me."

How often there is a measure of recovery to God. It shows in giving up this or that indulgence, or this or that association. Something is given up partially, but it is only cut off above the root. The outward fruit is cut off. But we do not cut loose from the root of the thing itself. Above all, we do not get clearly back to God. "If you will return, return to Me," is what God says, and there is great danger in partial restoration to communion.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the Return Must Reach God

There is a reason God accepts no other destination. Confession on its own can leave a person short of the light.

If we come to ourselves it is, "I will arise and go to my father." If it is restoration, "If you will return, return to Me." Indeed a soul is never really restored until it does. Short of that it is not in the light in a way that purges the flesh, even if the fruits of the flesh have been confessed. Nor is sin seen as it is in God's sight.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Heart Behind the Summons

The demand is searching, but the voice making it is not cold. Commentators read this call as an appeal, not just a condition.

If someone reading these lines has backslidden or fallen, we would urge him with all our heart to return to Jesus at once... The love of the heart of Jesus knows no change. We change, but He is "the same yesterday and today and forever," and He delights to be trusted. No doubt it is sad to fall, to go wrong, to backslide. It is sadder still, after we have fallen, to distrust the love of Jesus, or His gracious readiness to take us back to His heart.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Return — to Him. The whole verse turns on one word: Me. A return to forms, habits or half-measures is not the return God asks for.

- Return — with the idols gone. "Abominations" is Scripture's regular word for idolatry. Putting them away is not a warm-up for the return. It is the return, made with confession and self-judgment.

- Return — past the root. Partial restoration cuts off the visible fruit and leaves the root untouched. It looks like progress, but it stops short of God.

- Return — into the light. A soul is not truly restored until it reaches God, because only there is sin seen as He sees it.

- Return — for the Blesser, not the blessing. Come back for Himself, and everything else He promised follows; come back for the benefits, and you have not come back.

Jeremiah 4:2 · Darby

-- and thou shalt in truth, in justice, and in righteousness swear, [As] Jehovah liveth! and the nations shall bless themselves in him, and in him shall they glory.

Jeremiah has just called the people back to God, and this verse tells them what a real return sounds like. What makes an oath true, and how does one nation's repentance become the world's gain?

Return to the Person, not to the blessing

Verse 2 hangs on the call of verse 1. One writer works through that call step by step. Each step sets aside what Israel wanted, and leaves them with God Himself.

Let them return to the Lord — not to national greatness, but to the Lord their God — and the other would follow. Let them "Return to Me", not to national salvation, but to their Saviour God, and all else would then come right. Let them "RETURN TO ME", not to fullness of blessing, but to the Blesser Himself, and overflowing blessing would result. Let them "RETURN TO ME, says the Lord", not to be the head of all the nations, but to the King of nations, the King of Eternity, the living God. National headship would follow.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Nothing outward can stand in for Him. The chapter presses past ceremony to the heart:

And then comes the call that God could not be satisfied with outward forms. "Circumcise yourselves to the LORD, and remove the foreskin of your hearts, you men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem: lest My fury come forth like fire, and burn so that none can quench it."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

An oath on the living God

The words "As the LORD lives" are not a formula. They are the shout Jeremiah kept trying to wake his people with.

Time after time Jeremiah tried to wake the people of God with the cry, "THE LORD LIVES!" "THE LORD LIVES!!" … This is the way of true revival, and of overflow for others.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Words without truth

The oath must carry truth, justice and righteousness. The same book records those words on lips that meant nothing by them:

The Lord said, through Jeremiah, "Run to and fro through the streets of Jerusalem, and look and take note! Search her squares to see if you can find a man, one who does justice and seeks truth, that I may pardon her. Though they say, 'As the LORD lives,' yet they swear falsely."

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

The one boast God accepts

The verse ends with nations glorying in the Lord. One writer shows what that boast must rest on.

As for His people, blessed be His Name, our God will accept nothing less than their heart. And this is not about what they can be to Him, but about what He can be for them. "Let not the wise man boast in his wisdom, let not the mighty man boast in his might, let not the rich man boast in his riches, but let him who boasts boast in this, that he understands and knows me, that I am the LORD who practices steadfast love, justice, and righteousness in the earth. For in these things I delight, declares the LORD."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The nations and Israel's return

The second half of the verse is not a bonus. It reaches back to the promise God made to Abraham.

The world's blessing awaits Israel's restoration to God and to Canaan. Not to the Church, but to Abraham, Jehovah said: "in your offspring shall all the nations of the earth be blessed" (Gen. 22:18). … Israel and Jerusalem form the pivot upon which everything turns for the nations and for creation. Neither London, Berlin, nor Rome is, nor ever can be, God's centre of administration and blessing.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

A scene still ahead

One writer places this promise in a future age, not in anything already done.

It is a true picture — alive, moving, and told in few words. It shows the happy rule of blessing on earth in the coming age, after the church is taken to her heavenly home, and after the great tribulation that follows. Israel is seen saved and exalted in the Lord. In Him the nations gathered around Israel will bless themselves and glory!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Return — the call is to God Himself, not to better religion or a stronger nation. Everything else follows after that, never instead of it.

- Confess — a true return speaks: "As the LORD lives." That was the cry Jeremiah used again and again to wake his people.

- Truth — in Jeremiah 5 the same words came from lying lips. Truth, justice and righteousness separate a real confession from religious noise.

- Glory — God accepts one boast only: knowing Him. He is the One who practices steadfast love, justice and righteousness in the earth.

- Overflow — a restored Israel carries God's promise to Abraham out to the nations, who then bless themselves in Him. Commentators place this in the coming age, not today.

Jeremiah 4:3 · Darby

For thus saith Jehovah to the men of Judah and Jerusalem Break up for you a fallow ground, and sow not among thorns.

Before God will sow anything, He tells the men of Judah and Jerusalem to take a plough to the ground of their own hearts. The picture is drawn from farming, and it raises the question every reader has to answer personally: what is the state of the soil where God's word falls?

The setting: a return that goes deeper than religion

Jeremiah 4 keeps pressing the people to come back to God, and the terms are not ceremonial. One writer traces the argument of the chapter and notes what God refuses to accept:

Jeremiah 4 continues the moral pleadings with the people. Then comes the call showing that God could not be satisfied with outward forms. "Circumcise yourselves to the LORD; remove the foreskin of your hearts, O men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem; lest My wrath go forth like fire, and burn with none to quench it." The prophet has the Jew in particular in view, and his moral unfitness for the blessing of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fallow ground: land that was never turned

"Fallow ground" is ground left unworked. One writer explains why the farming image fits the human heart:

As it is in nature, so it is spiritually. Man's heart is, to say the least, a fallow field. It must be broken up before the seed of the word of God can be sown there and bear fruit. So the Lord calls "the men of Judah, and Jerusalem" to "break up your fallow ground, and sow not among thorns."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why people resist the plough

Ploughing is not pleasant. The same writer shows a man who felt the blade and pushed it away:

The lazy man would not do the preparatory work this needed. Sinners would rather not have their hearts broken. It is humbling and painful work. They resist the ploughshare in the conscience, and prefer to be left alone in their sins. Long ago, as the apostle Paul "reasoned about righteousness and self-control and the coming judgment, Felix was alarmed and said, 'Go away for the present. When I get an opportunity I will summon you.'" Felix felt the apostle's powerful appeal to his conscience, but he did not answer it. He refused the ploughshare, and his heart stayed unbroken.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The depth of the furrow

Can the ploughing go too deep? One writer answers no, and ties the depth of the furrow to what a person comes to value:

Still, there must be repentance, and the deeper the better. It is good that the plough should do its work, breaking up the fallow ground. It makes deep furrows where the incorruptible seed of the Word can take root. We do not believe anyone ever had cause to complain that the ploughshare entered too deeply into the soul. On the contrary, we are sure of this. The more we are led down into the depths of our own moral ruin, the more fully we will value the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The second half: thorns cut down but not dug out

The command's second half warns against sowing among thorns. One writer links it to the parable of the sower and points to what was left in the ground:

The roots of the thorns were left in the third plot, though it seems their tops had been cut off. They should have been rooted up. It was sowing among thorns, contrary to the word of God through Jeremiah, which we have looked at. Yet it was not the sower's responsibility to root up the thorns. The ground might look cleared, but the roots remained: worldliness, cares, riches, and pleasures.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Who holds the plough

The command tells people to plough. Yet one writer also describes God Himself breaking up that ground:

He will break up the fallow ground in His people's hearts with the ploughshare of His chastisement and judgments, so that they will cry to Him in their sorrow. Then their hearts will be ready for the sowing of His Word within them.

Modernised from J T MawsonOriginal wording

What it asks of those who preach

One writer applies the verse to preaching:

What is needed everywhere is a great revival of clear gospel preaching. It must press home on the consciences of men and women their lost condition, despite church membership, if they have not personally received the Lord Jesus Christ. The Word says, "Break up the fallow ground"; sow not among "thorns." We often hear people say they would like to see more old-time conversions. Well, there must first be the old-time preaching of the exceeding sinfulness of sin, and of the lost condition of all people by nature as well as by practice. This must go on until the old-time conviction takes hold of the souls of Christless men and women. Then the old-time gospel will be welcomed as the only relief.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

Summary

- Ground. The heart is untilled land, and God will not sow good seed into a surface that has never been opened.

- Plough. The blade is the conscience being reached; men like Felix feel it and push it away, and the ground stays unbroken.

- Depth. No one has cause to complain that the furrow went too deep. The deeper the sense of ruin, the more we value God's righteousness.

- Thorns. Tops cut off are not enough; cares, riches and pleasures left at the root will choke whatever is sown among them.

- Harvest. God Himself ploughs His people with chastening, so their hearts are ready to receive His Word and bear fruit.

Jeremiah 4:4 · Darby

Circumcise yourselves for Jehovah, and take away the foreskins of your heart, ye men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem; lest my fury come forth like fire and burn, and there be none to quench it, because of the evil of your doings.

God has just called Judah back to Himself. Here He names the change He is after: not a repair of religious practice, but a cut made in the heart, with fire no one can put out as the alternative.

A Return That Goes All the Way

The call in this verse belongs to a longer plea. God had been urging His people to come back, and the terms of that return are set before any promise of blessing.

Jeremiah 4 takes up again the subject of chapters 2 and 3. Applying it to the people of that time, it tells them that if they return, it must be to the Lord Himself — neither forms nor half-measures would be of any use. After verse 4 the prophet announces the certain judgment of God. It would come from the north and fall on Jerusalem in destruction.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the Command Is Aimed at Judah

The people addressed already carried the outward mark. That is exactly what makes the demand so pointed.

Jeremiah 4 pursues the moral pleadings with the people... And then comes the call, showing that outward forms could not satisfy God... You notice the peculiarity. It is the Jew in particular who comes into the prophet's view, and it is about his moral unfitness for the blessing of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Sign Was Always Meant to Say

The sign itself was the token of a covenant, and what it stood for was never only physical.

Circumcision is said to "be a token of the covenant between Me and you" (Genesis 17:11). That chapter tells us who took part in the rite and when to carry it out. It becomes clear that circumcision means the flesh must be kept in the place of death. The flesh can contribute nothing towards carrying out the will of God.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

One writer puts the cure in plain, practical terms:

I suppose that the exhortation to "circumcise ourselves to the Lord" means to cut off those "lusts of the flesh" which so easily trap us.

Modernised from George C WillisOriginal wording

Done "To the LORD"

The command adds a direction. That small phrase turns the act into a test of motive.

Perhaps this is the most important reference, because it is the goal set before us. The real value of anything we do shows when we do it to the Lord. Someone may have taken the greatest care in carrying out the act of circumcision — but was it done to the Lord? We can ask the same about the many areas of service that occupy us. We need to question our motives. Is it really done to Him?

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Religion Without a Reached Heart

Jeremiah is not tinkering with Judah's ceremonies; he is trying to get through to them. That gives the verse a reach far beyond his own nation.

The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the Lord", the circumcision which touches the heart, preparing it for Him. With pleadings and warnings he labours to reach them. It is the same today. Unless we have been reached in the heart, in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. That is true even though, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Verse Quoted Again in the New Testament

The demand here did not stay in Jeremiah's day. Commentators note that it is taken up and pressed again later in Scripture.

Jeremiah is also the only prophet who refers to the "token of the covenant" — to "circumcision". After the book of Joshua the first mention in the Old Testament is in Jeremiah 4:4. The Holy Spirit quotes it in Romans 2:28-29, to stress the inward reality necessary for the true Jew.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Commanded of Man, Yet Given by God

The verse issues an order. Yet the change it demands is one that only God produces, and commentators read it as pointing forward to that work.

A return must be a return to Him, the Lord; anything less is not enough. Their abominations must be judged and put away. Every return of backsliders must be in the same way — a true return to the Lord with confession of sin, self-judgment, and abandonment of evil. The circumcision of the heart means regeneration.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Return — the movement God asks for is toward Himself; forms and half-measures do not count, and the alternative is fire no one can put out.

- Heart — the knife is turned inward, and the fixed meaning of the sign is that the flesh is kept in the place of death.

- Cut — in practice this means cutting off the lusts of the flesh that so easily trap us.

- To Him — the phrase "to the LORD" makes motive the test; the same question exposes our service today.

- New — the inward reality asked for is regeneration, a new birth; Romans 2:28-29 takes up the same demand.

Jeremiah 4:5 · Darby

Declare ye in Judah, and cause it to be heard in Jerusalem, and say, ... and blow the trumpet in the land, cry aloud and say, Assemble yourselves, and let us enter into the fenced cities.

Jeremiah's message turns from appeal to alarm. He has called the people back to God; now he orders a war signal across the land and sends them running for the walled cities.

Appeal first, then alarm

The order matters. God first asks for a real turning. Only then does the judgment announcement begin, and this verse opens it.

Jeremiah 4 takes up again the subject of chapters 2 and 3. Applying it to the people of that time, it tells them that if they return, it must be to the Lord Himself. Neither forms nor half-measures would be of any use. After verse 4 the prophet announces the certain judgment of God. It would come from the north and fall on Jerusalem in destruction.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What the trumpet meant

The prophets use the trumpet in one main sense. Jeremiah's own words later in the chapter show it.

In the prophets the trumpet nearly always means war. Jeremiah puts it this way: "I hear the sound of the trumpet, the alarm of war."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The enemy from the north

The alarm is not vague. The prophet names the direction and the invader, picking up a vision God had already shown him.

Verses 5-13. This is the first definite announcement of the coming judgment from the north, which Jeremiah had seen in the vision of the boiling pot facing the north (chapter 1). The lion who comes, the destroyer of the nations, who makes the land desolate, is Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

God Himself is behind the invasion. The signals then come one after another.

There was no one to save the sad situation! So God raises up the instrument of His anger. The event the book points to is about to happen. Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle flag goes up! The trumpet sounds! Evil comes, and a great destruction!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Walls that could not hold

The verse sends people into the strongest towns in the land. Yet the chapter shows the walls and the leaders failing together.

Later in the chapter he says, "A lion has gone up from his thicket, a destroyer of nations has set out" — he means Nebuchadnezzar — "he has gone out from his place to make your land a waste; your cities will be ruins without inhabitant." And again: "In that day, declares the LORD, courage shall fail both king and officials. The priests shall be appalled and the prophets astounded." No power would be found anywhere, because God had been forsaken.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A warning that came true

When the alarm sounded, Jerusalem looked safe and rich. That is what makes the prophecy remarkable.

In Josiah's day, things looked very prosperous at Jerusalem. Still, the prophet foretold that "disaster from the north, and great destruction" would come on the city. It happened exactly as he said, but we tend to overlook how miraculous that was.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Warning before the sword

The trumpet is mercy inside the threat. The same pattern runs through Scripture and into today.

It is God's way to sound the trumpet before He draws His sword. You can see this plainly in Ezekiel 33:4-5. Before God destroyed the earth by water, He sounded the warning trumpet through Noah. In our own time, before the last blow falls, His trumpet sounds in the gospel call. Will you not listen to it, and seek salvation while you may? "Is a trumpet blown in a city, and the people are not afraid?"

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Sequence — The trumpet comes after the plea. God asks first for a real return to Himself, not forms or half-measures. Then the alarm sounds.

- Signal — In the prophets the trumpet means war. Jeremiah himself hears it as the alarm of war.

- Source — The threat has a name. Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon is the destroyer from the north, and he matches the boiling pot Jeremiah saw when God called him.

- Shelter — The fortified cities were no shelter. King, officials, priests and prophets all failed together, because God had been forsaken.

- Summons — God sounds the trumpet before He draws the sword. The same call sounds today in the gospel.

Jeremiah 4:6 · Darby

Set up a banner toward Zion; take to flight, stay not! For I am bringing evil from the north, and a great destruction.

In Josiah's day Jerusalem looked secure. Yet God tells Jeremiah to put up a signal toward Zion and warn the people to run for cover. Something is coming out of the north. Two questions follow: who is this enemy, and why does God warn so far ahead?

The Alarm in Chapter Four

Here the chapter turns from pleading to a war cry. God says He Himself brings the disaster, and the invader is only His instrument. One writer gathers the images into one scene of alarm:

There was no man to save the sorrowful situation! Therefore the instrument of God's anger is raised up. The event to which the book points is to take place. Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sound is heard! Evil comes and a great destruction! Set up a sign of fire!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The trumpet gathers the people behind walls.

Jeremiah 4 summons the people to return to the Lord, and this in truth of heart, so that His fury does not break out and burn like fire. Let the trumpet assemble them to the fortified cities, for destruction comes from the north. It is Nebuchadnezzar.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the North

"The north" is not vague dread. It is a named empire — and not the one readers might expect:

Jeremiah from first to last dwells very much upon Babylon. Babylon was this northern power that is in the mind of the Spirit of God throughout. It is not the Assyrian. The Assyrian was northern too, but the Assyrian power was now destroyed, and it is only in the latter day that Assyria will rise again. But meanwhile Babylon was the great power that overshadowed the earth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Summons Behind the Alarm

The chapter opens with a call to return. One writer draws out what the people were called back to — not a benefit, but God Himself:

Let them return to the Lord, not to national greatness, but to the Lord their God, and the other would follow. Let them "Return to Me" — not to national salvation, but to their Saviour God, and all else would then come right. Let them "RETURN TO ME" — not to fullness of blessing, but to the Blesser Himself; overflowing blessing would result.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

That pattern is not confined to Judah. It is how anyone comes back:

A return must be a return to Him, Jehovah; anything less is not enough. Their abominations must be judged and put away. Every return of backsliders must be in the same way — a true return to the Lord with confession of sin, self-judgment, and abandonment of evil.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A Prophecy Nobody Believed

At the time, predicting the fall of a thriving capital sounded absurd:

In Josiah's day, things looked very prosperous at Jerusalem. Still, the prophet foretold over the city "evil from the north, and a great destruction." This came true exactly, but we are apt to overlook how miraculous it was. Suppose someone announced today that St. Petersburg would be captured and destroyed. Most people would smile and dismiss the idea. If it took place, the fulfilment would be all the more striking because of their scepticism. So it is with Jeremiah's prophecy about Jerusalem.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

(Older translations read "evil from the north"; the ESV has "disaster from the north.")

The Long Pause, Then the Blow

The long gap before the blow was not indifference. It was patience:

There was nothing immediate or sudden. Jeremiah spoke the word of the Lord and suffered for it. God in long-suffering mercy waited on the people, patiently looking for their repentance. That did not happen; and meanwhile the prophet was reproached and ill-treated. In the end the hearts of the people, the princes, the priests, the prophets and the pastors grew utterly hard. Then Jeremiah's words came true, and fast.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The delay was never a cancellation:

God was not, and is not, in any hurry to judge, and He never sits in judgment without giving plenty of warning; but doom comes at last, and deservedly.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Signal. The banner and the trumpet call the people to run for cover. They leave the open ground for the fortified cities.

- Source. God says He brings the disaster, and His instrument is Babylon under Nebuchadnezzar — not Assyria, whose power was already broken.

- Summons. The alarm sits inside a bigger call: return to the Lord Himself, with confession of sin, self-judgment, and the giving up of evil.

- Silence. God waited long for repentance while people mistreated His prophet. Only when hearts grew fully hard did the blow fall, and it fell fast.

- Certainty. The warning sounded absurd while Jerusalem prospered. It came true anyway. A delayed warning is still a warning.

Jeremiah 4:7 · Darby

The lion is come up from his thicket, the destroyer of the nations is on his way; he is gone forth from his place, to make thy land desolate; thy cities shall be laid waste, without inhabitant.

Jeremiah has just pleaded with Judah to return to God with a changed heart. Now the tone shifts from appeal to alarm: a predator is already on the road, the verse names no one, and commentators agree both on who he is and on who sent him.

The Lion Named

The picture is not vague. It points to one king, whose coming Jeremiah had already seen in an earlier vision.

This is the first clear announcement of the coming judgment from the north. Jeremiah had already seen it in the vision of the boiling pot facing north (chapter 1). The lion who comes, the destroyer of the nations, who makes the land desolate, is Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon. It is a very vivid description of the approaching judgment.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why a Lion

The image is not Jeremiah's own invention. Other prophets use the same animal, and a later vision joins it to a second one to show what Babylon was.

"The first was like a lion and had eagles' wings." There, beyond question, we have the empire of Babylon. It is nothing new for the Holy Spirit to apply the figure of a lion to Nebuchadnezzar, or of an eagle either. Jeremiah has already used the same figure: "A lion has gone up from his thicket, a destroyer of nations has set out." Ezekiel, like Jeremiah, also pictured him as an eagle. He is in fact called both the lion and the eagle in Jer. 49:19-22. In Daniel's vision the Holy Spirit combines the two figures in one symbol, to give a fitting picture of what the empire of Babylon was in the mind of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Destroyer on God's Errand

A lion leaving its lair looks like raw appetite. But God had His own purpose in this march, and it reached beyond the punishing of one city.

He was the man in whom God set up the Gentiles. The house of David, the throne of Judah, had corrupted itself; the people's sin had reached its full measure, and God's patience had run out in Nebuchadnezzar's day. The Lord uses him as the rod of His anger against Jerusalem, and as the hand that takes from Him the sword of rule and judgment in the earth.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Cities Without an Inhabitant

The verse ends with emptied cities. What follows shows what that emptiness did to the men who ran the nation.

Later in the chapter he speaks of Nebuchadnezzar: "he has gone out from his place to make your land a waste; your cities will be ruins without inhabitant." Then, in that day, says the Lord, the heart of the king will fail, and the heart of the princes; the priests will be astonished, and the prophets will wonder. No power will be found anywhere, because they had forsaken God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Door That Was Still Open

The warning does not stand alone. It follows an offer, and that offer has terms.

Jeremiah 4 takes up again the subject of chapters 2 and 3. Applied to the people of that day, it tells them that if they return, it must be to the Lord Himself — neither forms nor half-measures would be of any use. After verse 4 the prophet announces the certain judgment of God, which would come from the north and fall on Jerusalem in destruction.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God asked one thing of Judah, and He asks the same of anyone who has drifted:

Every return of backsliders must be in the same way — a true return to the Lord with confession of sin, self-judgment, and abandonment of evil.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Spoken Before It Happened

When these words were first spoken, nothing about Jerusalem looked doomed. That is what makes the fulfilment worth weighing.

In Josiah's day, things looked very prosperous at Jerusalem. Yet the prophet foretold for the city "disaster from the north, and great destruction." It came true exactly, but we easily overlook how miraculous it was. If someone announced today that an enemy would capture and destroy a great capital city, most people would smile and dismiss the idea. If it took place, the fulfilment would be the more striking because of their scepticism. So it is with Jeremiah's prophecy about Jerusalem.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Named. The lion coming up from his thicket is Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. Jeremiah had already seen this judgment from the north in the vision of the boiling pot.

- Pictured. Lion and eagle are settled symbols for Babylon in the prophets. Daniel's vision joins the two to show what that empire was in the mind of God.

- Sent. God uses the destroyer as the rod of His anger against Jerusalem. The same hand takes the sword of rule in the earth, as the house of David is set aside.

- Emptied. When the lion has passed, king, princes, priests and prophets all fail together. They had forsaken God, so no power is left anywhere.

- Avoidable. The threat follows an offer: return, and return to the Lord Himself — with confession, self-judgment, and leaving the evil behind. Forms and half-measures were of no use then, and are of no use now.

Jeremiah 4:8 · Darby

For this, gird you with sackcloth, lament and howl! for the fierce anger of Jehovah is not turned away from us.

Jeremiah 4 has just announced an invader — a lion out of his thicket, a destroyer already on the road — and now God tells the people to dress for mourning. Why does He ask for grief instead of defence, and what sort of grief does He want?

The alarm behind the call

The command to mourn sits inside a war bulletin. One writer traces the chapter from its plea for real repentance to the naming of the invader from the north.

Jeremiah 4 summons the people to return to the Lord, and this in truth of heart, in case His fury breaks out and burns like fire. Let the trumpet gather them to the fortified cities, for destruction comes from the north. It is Nebuchadnezzar. "The lion has come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the nations is on his way. … For this put on sackcloth, lament and wail, for the fierce anger of the Lord has not turned back from us."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sackcloth: the badge of mourning

The cloth named here carried a fixed meaning across Scripture. Prophets wore it themselves.

From these passages we see that sackcloth was the badge of mourning. People wore it at times of bereavement, calamity, or personal and national repentance. It was worn by the prophets, no doubt in keeping with their own mourning and with their call to the people to repent.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The grief God is asking for

The point of the sackcloth was never the cloth. It was to make a nation feel what it had done.

The Lord was not indifferent to Israel's plight, for He called "for weeping and mourning, for baldness and wearing sackcloth." The Lord wanted His people to feel how serious their departure from Him was. He wanted them to return to Him in true sorrow and repentance.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Mourning can also be a counterfeit. One writer asks what a nation's fasting and mourning were for.

Had they mourned because the trouble had come on themselves? Or because the trouble came from the dishonour and shame they had brought on God? … They had fasted for themselves and cried over their own disaster, but had failed to repent. They had grieved over their own fate rather than asking what caused God's judgments and mourning over their condition. To be sad about ruin is not the same as humbling yourself before the Lord.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Why the anger had not turned back

The chapter opened with the way back, and it was not a change of clothes. God asked for something done to the heart, and He named what would follow if they refused.

Jeremiah 4 continues the moral pleading with the people. "If you will return, O Israel, says the Lord, return to Me." Then comes the call showing that God could not be satisfied with outward forms. "Circumcise yourselves to the Lord, and remove the foreskins of your heart, you men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem. Otherwise My fury will come out like fire and burn, and no one will be able to quench it."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Even so, God announced the blow long before it landed.

God was not, and is not, in any hurry to judge. He never sits in judgment without giving plenty of warning. But the sentence comes at last, and it is deserved.

Modernised from J Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Anger that reaches past Nebuchadnezzar

The anger named in this verse has a longer reach than one army. One writer points to the vision that comes a few verses later.

"I looked on the earth, and behold, it was without form and void; and to the heavens, and they had no light. I looked on the mountains, and behold, they were quaking… I looked, and behold, there was no man, and all the birds of the air had fled. … The fruitful land was a desert, and all its cities were laid in ruins before the Lord, and before His fierce anger." All this was a vision of the trouble hanging over the Jews, and in fact over the nations as a whole. This prophecy goes far beyond what Nebuchadnezzar inflicted, and includes judgments still future.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. God calls for the clothes of grief while the invader is still on the road. He announces the blow before He strikes, and the sentence, when it falls, is deserved.

- Worn. Sackcloth was the badge of mourning: for the dead, for disaster, for national repentance. Prophets wore it themselves while calling others to repent.

- Wanted. The point of the sign was feeling. God wanted His people to grasp how serious their leaving Him was, and to come back in real sorrow.

- Weighed. Grief over wreckage is not the same as bowing before God. People can cry over their own losses and never once ask what caused the judgment.

- Wider. The anger that had not turned back from Jerusalem reaches past Nebuchadnezzar's armies to judgments still ahead. That is why the call to return is not old news.

Jeremiah 4:9 · Darby

And it shall come to pass in that day, saith Jehovah, that the heart of the king shall perish, and the heart of the princes; and the priests shall be astonished, and the prophets shall be amazed.

Jeremiah 4 calls a whole nation back to God, with an army from the north already on the way. Now the prophet names the day that call runs out — the day every leader in the land loses his nerve.

The enemy already on the road

The threat is not vague. The prophet names the invader, and shows a country sliding back into disorder.

From Jeremiah 4:3 to the end of Jeremiah 6 the prophet deals with the state of Israel. Like the chaos that overtook the distant creation of Genesis 1:1, ignorance of God and injustice were bringing the same thing on the nation. There was no man to save the sorrowful situation! So the instrument of God's anger is raised up. The event the book points to is about to happen. Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sound is heard!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Courage drains away when God has been abandoned

The heart failing is not a medical detail. It is the nerve of the nation giving out, and one commentator traces it to a single cause.

"The lion has come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the nations is on his way" — referring to Nebuchadnezzar. … No power will be found anywhere because God was forsaken. … This prophecy goes far beyond the damage Nebuchadnezzar did. It takes in judgments that are still to come.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The religious leaders are stunned because they were wrong

The priests and prophets are astonished — and their shock is itself the verdict on them. This verse opens a chain of statements running through the book, each one exposing the men who claimed to speak for God.

In Jeremiah, the first of three features is God's testimony against the prophets. "The priests shall be appalled and the prophets astounded" (Jer. 4:9). "An appalling and horrible thing has happened in the land: the prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction; my people love to have it so" (Jer. 5:30-31). "From prophet to priest, everyone deals falsely" (Jer. 6:13).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Notice the last line quoted from Jeremiah 5: the people were not victims of the false prophets. They liked what they were hearing.

How to tell a false message from a true one

The prophets have nothing to say when trouble lands, because of what they said before it landed. There is a test that sorts the two kinds of preaching.

It is always a mark of false prophecies that in a day of evil they promised prosperity. When the people of God have departed from Him, false prophets prophesy smooth things. They have their glowing dreams of progress and of the extension of the work and blessing of the Lord. The coming of great things and pleasant things is their invariable testimony. A true prophet, on the contrary, in the day of evil warns of the coming of the Lord to judge the ungodly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Religious structure is no shelter

Judah still had a monarchy, a priesthood and a prophetic order — the very four groups this verse names — and every one of them failed. The chapter had already said what God actually wanted, and it was not machinery.

The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the Lord", the circumcision that touches the heart, preparing it for Him. With pleadings and warnings he labours to reach them. It is the same today. Unless we have been reached in the heart, in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are strangers to the living God. That is true even if, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The way back was never closed

Even with the invader on the road, the chapter's opening word still stood, and it pointed to a Person rather than a programme.

The path of restoration is a return — not to outward observances, but to Himself, and nothing less than that. "If you return, O Israel, declares the LORD, to me you should return" (Jer. 4). As for His people — blessed be His Name — our God is satisfied with nothing less than their heart. And this is not about what they can be to Him. It is about what He can be for them.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

This day of collapse was not the end of the story for the nation.

But, as always, God keeps a remnant. They truly turn to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him. So He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Forsaken. King, officials, priests and prophets all collapse for one reason: "No power will be found anywhere because God was forsaken."

- Flattered. The message failed before the courage did. Prophets promised good times in a day of evil, and the people "love to have it so."

- Exposed. Astonishment is the evidence. Judgment only stuns people who have told themselves it would never come.

- Hollow. Judah kept its priests, its forms and its claim to be God's people. But the heart was untouched, so the structure gave way with everything else.

- Return. The one road out was never a repair of the system. It was a return to the Lord Himself, who asks for the heart — and who keeps a remnant for Himself.

Jeremiah 4:10 · Darby

And I said, Alas, Lord Jehovah! surely thou hast greatly deceived this people and Jerusalem, saying, Ye shall have peace; whereas the sword reacheth unto the soul.

Jeremiah sees an invasion coming from the north. Yet the people are still hearing that all will be well, so he takes his protest straight to God. Did God mislead His own people? Or is something else behind that promise of peace?

The Sword Already at the Door

In this chapter the judgment is no longer a distant threat. One writer names the invader and shows what happens to the leaders when he arrives.

So he says later on in the chapter, "The lion has come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the nations is on his way." He means Nebuchadnezzar. "He has gone out from his place to make your land desolate; and your cities shall be laid waste, without an inhabitant." "And in that day, says Jehovah, the heart of the king will fail, and the heart of the princes. The priests will be astonished, and the prophets will wonder." No power will be found anywhere because God was forsaken.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Promised Peace

Read plainly, the verse sounds like a charge that God lied. One writer rejects that reading and points to the men who actually made the promise of peace.

Verse 10 does not mean that Jeremiah is blaming the Lord for deceiving the people. Jeremiah did not preach peace, but the false prophets did. They came and spoke in the name of Jehovah, saying there would be peace. Jehovah allowed both these prophets and their message as a judgment. So the people were deceived.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Word Behind "Deceived"

The same Hebrew word turns up later in the book, where Jeremiah speaks about himself. One writer argues the older English rendering is simply wrong there, and points back to this verse for the correct sense.

It is a wrong translation in verse 7 which makes Jeremiah accuse the Lord of deceiving him. It should read, "Lord, You have enticed me," being the same word as in verse 10.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Prophets Who Promised Exemption

Jeremiah makes this same complaint again in chapter 14, and there God answers it directly. The answer shows what happens to the men who guaranteed safety — and to the crowd that preferred their message.

The false prophets must be the first to fall by the very disaster they promised the people would escape. And the people must learn through their own just ruin how foolish it is to heed man's promises.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why a Comfortable Lie Finds a Market

False prophecy is not a random accident. Commentators describe it as a predictable response whenever God's people drift, and they name what it is designed to prevent.

When the people of God go wrong, the spirit of false prophecy is always there. It would have them believe that all goes well. Men in authority love to hear that they need not be discouraged. Look at the opposition Jeremiah met in Jerusalem. The false prophet helps this along. He keeps the conscience from turning back to God, who would use chastening to bring the conscience into direct contact with Him.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer asks who sends the blindness that follows a refusal of light.

Does God cause darkness? Yes, truly, and blindness too, if people refuse His light. No darkness is deeper, and no blindness more complete, than the darkness God sends as a judgment on those who treat His Word lightly.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Same Voices Today

The soothing message did not die with Jeremiah's generation.

There is no shortage of people who prophesy smooth things. In Jeremiah's day some said, "Peace, peace," while the Lord's sword hung over the land. We have similar false prophets among us today... All who speak this way are deceivers of men's souls.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Sword. Nebuchadnezzar was already on the road. When he came, king, princes, priests and prophets all collapsed. No power was left anywhere, because the people had forsaken God.

- Source. Jeremiah is not charging God with lying. He never preached peace. The false prophets did, speaking in God's name. God allowed both those men and their message as a judgment.

- Summons. The prophet does not stop at protest. He calls Jerusalem to wash her heart from wickedness, so that she may be saved.

- Silence. A comfortable message keeps the conscience from turning back to God. And the deepest darkness of all is the blindness God sends on those who treat His Word lightly.

- Settlement. The prophets who promised safety fell first by the very disaster they ruled out. The people learned the cost of trusting man's promises through their own ruin.

Jeremiah 4:11 · Darby

At that time shall it be said to this people and to Jerusalem, A hot wind [cometh] from the heights in the wilderness, on the way of the daughter of my people, not for fanning, nor for cleansing.

Jeremiah has just sounded the alarm over Judah — an invader on the way, cities emptied, leaders losing heart. Now a word comes to Jerusalem: a scorching desert wind that will not do what a farmer's wind does and separate good grain from chaff.

The image behind the words

The language of fanning comes from the threshing floor. A dictionary of Bible terms explains the tool:

The fan was a small shovel. A worker threw wheat up into the air with it, so the wind might carry away the chaff (Isaiah 30:24; Jeremiah 4:11). Scripture also uses it as a picture of the judgements of God (Isaiah 41:16; Jeremiah 15:7; Jeremiah 51:2), and of the separating power of the testimony of the Lord Jesus (Matthew 3:12; Luke 3:17).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

That is what makes this wind so severe. One writer compares the two farm pictures:

Threshing is the simple picture of judgment. But winnowing carries the double idea of separation both to mercy and to judgment, and this is especially so where the fan is in view.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The wind has a name

The blast is not weather. It belongs to an announcement that runs through this part of the chapter, and one writer names the invader behind it:

Verses 5-13. This is the first definite announcement of the coming judgment from the north. Jeremiah had seen it in the vision of the boiling pot facing north (chapter 1). The lion who comes, the destroyer of the Gentiles, who makes the land desolate, is Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon. It is a very vivid description of the approaching judgment.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Spoken over people who had been promised peace

The verse arrives immediately after Jeremiah's protest that this people had been told they would have peace. That promise came from voices claiming God's authority:

Verse 10 does not mean that Jeremiah is blaming the Lord for deceiving the people. Jeremiah did not preach peace, but the false prophets did. They came and spoke in the name of the LORD, saying that there would be peace. The LORD allowed these prophets and their message as a judgment. And so the people were deceived.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

When it fell, no leader was left standing. One commentator traces the collapse in the same chapter to a single cause: "No power will be found anywhere because God was forsaken."

William Kelly

Where the ruin started

One writer traces Jeremiah's early chapters, this verse among them, back to a single starting point:

In the Lord's appeal to Israel, through the prophet Jeremiah, we learn what ruined the nation in its responsibility. It had one source: they lost the affection for the LORD with which they began their history as a people called out from the nations. (Jeremiah 2:2, 13, 19; 3:12, 14, 22; 4:11, 17.)

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

The only way back

The chapter opens with an offer, and it is not an offer of religious repairs:

Jeremiah 4 takes up the subject of chapters 2 and 3 again. Applied to the people of that day, it tells them that if they return, it must be to the Lord Himself. Neither forms nor half-measures would be of any use. After verse 4 the prophet announces the certain judgment of God. It would come from the north and fall on Jerusalem in destruction.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A day still ahead

Commentators differ on how far the passage reaches. One reads verses 10-11 as looking past Babylon altogether, to a final assault on the nation:

The day of the Babylonian leads the prophet on to the day of Israel's allied enemies at the end (Jeremiah 4:10-11). This closing judgment will be severe. Scripture presents the rejection of Christ as the occasion and the warrant for it. Judah insulted Messiah when He came to them. They struck the Judge of Israel on the cheek (Matthew 27:30). But the One whom they refused and insulted shall be their only hope. This is Joseph again, and Moses again. Those whom the nation once refused are their only strength and hope in the day of disaster.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Wind. The fan threw wheat into the air so the breeze could carry off the chaff. This blast does no such sorting.

- Warning. Threshing pictures plain judgment. Winnowing carries a double idea: separation to mercy as well as to judgment. This wind brings no such sifting.

- Name. The blast is Nebuchadnezzar, the destroyer from the north whom Jeremiah had already seen in the vision of the boiling pot.

- Root. The nation's ruin traces back to one thing. It lost its first affection for the Lord, and in the end it forsook Him.

- Return. The way out was never forms or half-measures. It was a return to the Lord Himself. And the One the nation once refused is still its only hope in the day of trouble.

Jeremiah 4:12 · Darby

A wind more vehement than that shall come from me now will I also pronounce judgments against them.

The chapter opens with God pleading for a real return. Then it says what comes if Judah refuses: a wind off the bare heights, sweeping toward Jerusalem. Two questions follow. Why send a wind too strong to winnow with? And who speaks the sentence at the end of the verse?

The image behind the words

The wind here belongs to the threshing floor. A farming tool lies behind the picture.

The fan was a small shovel, used to throw a portion of wheat up into the air so that the wind might carry away the chaff. Isaiah 30:24; Jeremiah 4:11. It is also used as a symbol of the judgments of God, Isaiah 41:16; Jeremiah 15:7; Jeremiah 51:2; and of the discriminating power of the testimony of the Lord Jesus. Matthew 3:12; Luke 3:17.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Winnowing separates and saves the grain. This wind is too strong for that careful work. And it is no random force.

God uses the wind, as He uses everything else, to work out His purposes with man. Exodus 10:13; Psalm 135:7; Ezekiel 13:13.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A name for the wind

The storm blowing toward Judah is not weather. Commentators give it a name.

Verses 5-13. This is the first definite announcement of the coming judgment from the north. Jeremiah had already seen it in the vision of the boiling pot facing north (chapter 1). The lion who comes, the destroyer of the nations, who makes the land desolate, is Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon. It is a very vivid description of the approaching judgment.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

One cause lies under the whole collapse.

"A lion has gone up from his thicket, a destroyer of nations has set out." That refers to Nebuchadnezzar. "He has gone out from his place to make your land a waste; your cities will be ruins without inhabitant." … No power will be found anywhere because God was forsaken.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who is really coming

The verse does not end with an army. It ends with God Himself pronouncing sentence. Wind, cloud and fire in the prophets mark more than a military threat.

The vision comes from the north, for a storm cloud of divine indignation from the north (Babylon) was to burst over the house of Judah. The whirlwind, the cloud, and the fire that the prophet Ezekiel saw are symbols of glory, the divine presence and judgment. (See Psalm 18:8-13; Habakkuk 3; Jeremiah 4:12-13.)

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Judgment after a refused appeal

The judgment announced here is not sudden temper. It comes at the end of a long appeal.

Jeremiah 4 takes up again the subject of chapters 2 and 3. Applying it to the people of that day, it tells them that if they return, it must be to the Lord Himself. Neither forms nor half-measures would be of any use. After verse 4 the prophet announces the certain judgment of God. It would come from the north and fall upon Jerusalem in destruction.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another road stood open the whole time. It was personal, not ceremonial.

The pathway of restoration is a return to Himself, not to outward observances, and nothing short of that. "If you return, O Israel, declares the LORD, to me you should return" (Jeremiah 4). As for His people — blessed be His name — nothing less than their heart satisfies our God.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What it asks of a reader now

Jeremiah aimed at the heart of a people sure of their religious standing. The same test stands now.

With pleadings and warnings he works to reach them. It is the same today. God must reach us in the heart and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being. Without that we are strangers to the living God, even though, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion. … But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. These truly turn to the Lord Himself and are true in heart to Him (Jeremiah 4:27 and 5:18). So He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Wind after refusal. God asked for a return to Himself, not forms or half-measures. This wind is what follows when a people refuse that call.

- Wind too strong. A fan lifts grain so the breeze can carry off the husks. This blast is past sifting. Scripture uses the fan as a figure of God's judgments.

- Wind named. The storm from the north is Nebuchadnezzar, the destroyer already seen in Jeremiah's vision of the boiling pot.

- Wind divine. Whirlwind, cloud and fire are not just weather or war — they mark God's own presence and indignation against His people.

- Wind limited. No defence stands where God is forsaken, yet He keeps a remnant true in heart and will not make a full end.

Jeremiah 4:13 · Darby

Behold, he cometh up as clouds, and his chariots are as a whirlwind; his horses are swifter than eagles. Woe unto us! for we are destroyed.

Jeremiah 4 has been calling Judah back to God, and now the warning gets specific. An army is coming with the speed of a storm — but who sends it, and could anything have stopped it?

The invader in the picture

The chapter does not leave the threat vague. It calls the people home, sounds the alarm, and names the invader.

Jeremiah 4 summons the people to return to the Lord, and this in truth of heart, in case His fury breaks out and burns like fire. Let the trumpet gather them to the fortified cities, for destruction comes from the north. It is Nebuchadnezzar… The prophet next tells Jerusalem plainly that these bitter things fall on her because of her sins.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The warning was not new. Jeremiah had already seen it in a picture at the start of the book.

Verses 5-13. This is the first definite announcement of the coming judgment from the north. Jeremiah had seen it in the vision of the boiling pot facing north (chapter 1). The lion who comes, the destroyer of the Gentiles, who makes the land desolate, is Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why speed is the point

Clouds, whirlwind and eagles all say one thing: speed. Habakkuk describes the Chaldean army in almost the same words, and one writer sets the two side by side.

Then follows the vivid and terrible description of the Chaldean power: "Their horses are swifter than leopards, more fierce than the evening wolves; their horsemen press proudly on. Their horsemen come from afar; they fly like an eagle swift to devour" (Hab. 1:8). More than once Jeremiah uses the same expressions (Jer. 4:13; 5:6; etc.)… The swiftness and agility of the Chaldeans were like a pack of hungry wolves rushing on silently. With gleaming eyes glowing in the dark, they were sure to reach their prey. Just at the right moment the horsemen came storming on, swift as eagles.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Horses stand for the same handful of qualities all through the Bible, and this verse is one of the examples.

So they represent strength (Job 39:19; Ps. 147:10), swiftness (Jer. 4:13; Hab. 1:8), fearlessness (Job 39:18; Jer. 8:6), majesty (Esther 6:8), and strength in the battle.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

A rod in God's hand

The chariots race, but they are not the real power in the scene. One writer places Nebuchadnezzar in a line of rulers God used to discipline others, and then judged in turn.

God might use Jeroboam to discipline Solomon and his house. He might use the kings of Assyria to discipline Jeroboam's subjects. He might use Nebuchadnezzar to discipline Judah and its kings. But all these in their turn God has had to judge. These rods of His anger (Isa. 10:5) were no more faithful to God than the people He used them against.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why the cry came too late

The cry "Woe to us!" has a history behind it. Verse 10 raises a hard question: had God Himself misled the people with a promise of peace?

Verse 10 does not mean that Jeremiah is blaming the Lord for deceiving the people. Jeremiah did not preach peace, but the false prophets did. They came and spoke in the name of Jehovah, saying that there would be peace. And Jehovah permitted these prophets, and their message, as a judgment. And so they were deceived.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Scripture treats that pattern as permanent, not local to Judah.

"While people are saying, 'There is peace and security,' then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman, and they will not escape"… Sudden destruction indeed hangs over those who trust themselves and their own thoughts, rejecting the testimony of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one road that was open

The chapter had already named the way out, and it set the pattern for every later return.

A return must be a return to Him, Jehovah; anything less is not enough. Their abominations must be judged and put away. Everyone who has drifted away must return in the same way — a true return to the Lord with confession of sin, self-judgment, and turning from evil.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Named. The one coming up like clouds is Nebuchadnezzar, the destroyer from the north. Jeremiah had already seen him in the vision of the boiling pot.

- Swift. Chariots like a whirlwind and horses faster than eagles stand for speed. Like wolves after prey, this army was sure to reach its target.

- Sent. He is only a rod in God's hand to discipline Judah. God judged such rods in turn, since they were no more faithful than the people they struck.

- Deceived. The cry of ruin is bitter because false prophets had promised peace in God's name. God let that message run on as part of the judgment.

- Return. The one road out was a real return to the Lord: confession of sin, self-judgment, and evil put away.

Jeremiah 4:14 · Darby

Wash thy heart, Jerusalem, from wickedness, that thou mayest be saved. How long shall thy vain thoughts lodge within thee?

An army is marching on Jerusalem from the north, and God turns from her walls to her heart. The command sounds strange: no city can scrub its own inner life, yet salvation hangs on it.

The setting of the plea

This chapter is a summons, not a cold announcement of doom, and an invader is already on the way.

Jeremiah 4 summons the people to return to the Lord, and to return in truth of heart. If they do not, His fury will break out and burn like fire. Let the trumpet gather them to the fortified cities, for destruction is coming from the north. It is Nebuchadnezzar... The prophet then tells Jerusalem plainly that these bitter things fall on her because of her sins. Then he pours out the grief of his own anguished heart over the horrors hanging over the guilty but beloved city and land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What God will not accept

God had already told these people that soap could not touch their stain.

But it is no use for a backslider to try to put things right outwardly. That is the next point. External washing will not do. It is the inside — the heart — that must be put right. "Though you wash yourself with lye and use much soap, the stain of your guilt is still before me, declares the Lord God" (Jer. 2:22).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The word behind "wash"

Hebrew has several words for washing, and the one chosen here is not the word for rinsing a hand or bathing a body.

"Kabas" is the last word for "wash," and its use is just as distinctive as the one we have just examined. The word means to "tread," and so to wash by treading. Scripture uses it only for washing clothes and other things, or for describing the spiritual effect of cleansing, as in Psalm 51:2, 7; Jer. 2:22; Jer. 4:14. One passage uses three words, each in its own way: rinsing the hands, washing the clothes, and bathing the person (Lev. 15:11).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Thoughts that take up residence

The second half of the verse asks how long the wicked thinking will stay. The delay is not about ability. Sinners keep that question open by choice, and Felix is the example.

Sinners would rather not have their hearts broken. It is humbling and painful work. They resist the ploughshare in the conscience, and prefer to be left alone in their sins. It was the same long ago. Paul "reasoned about righteousness and self-control and the coming judgment," and "Felix was alarmed and said, 'Go away for the present. When I get an opportunity I will summon you'" (Acts 24:25). The powerful appeal of the apostle to the conscience of Felix was felt, but not answered. He refused the ploughshare, and his heart stayed unbroken.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Religion without a reached heart

God's appeal runs through the whole chapter, and it presses on one people in particular.

Jeremiah 4 continues the moral pleadings with the people. "If you will return, O Israel, declares the Lord, return to Me." And then comes the call showing that God could not be satisfied with outward forms... Notice the peculiarity. It is the Jew in particular who comes into the prophet's view, and it is his moral unfitness for the blessing of God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same test falls on readers today. A name and a religious system can sit on top of a heart God has never reached.

We must be reached in the heart, in the spirit, in the very centre of our being. Without that we are alienated from the living God. Like these Jews, we may call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Who does the washing

God still makes this appeal, and He also promises to do the washing Himself.

And the appeal of God still goes out... "Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean; remove the evil of your deeds from before my eyes" (Isa. 1:16). "Cleanse your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded" (James 4:8). But there can be no real national response until they look on Him whom they pierced... Then the Lord Himself will undertake their purification. He promised long ago: "I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean from all your uncleannesses, and from all your idols I will cleanse you" (Ezek. 36:25).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same order shapes Israel's future: heart first, then rescue.

The purpose of God is to save the nation — all Israel. But the heart of Jerusalem must be washed (Jer. 4:14) before salvation can be placed in Zion for Israel His glory (Isa. 46:13).

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Summary

- Heart — God aims at the inside; outward washing, however thorough, leaves the stain.

- Word — the verb means to tread clothes clean; Scripture uses it for spiritual cleansing too.

- Lodging — wicked thoughts settle in and stay. The question "how long" presses an unwilling conscience, as it did Felix.

- Form — a name, a priesthood and a religious system prove nothing if the centre of a person has never been reached.

- Cleansing — the command stands, but God finishes it Himself. He will sprinkle clean water, and Jerusalem's heart must be washed before her salvation comes.

Jeremiah 4:15 · Darby

For a voice declareth from Dan, and publisheth affliction from mount Ephraim.

A warning cry runs down the length of the land, from the northern border to the hills of Ephraim. It reports an invading army, and it raises one question: will a warning heard become a warning heeded?

Dan: the warning starts at the northern gate

The place named first is not a random village. It marks the outer edge of the land, and it carries a history of its own:

The portion of land that fell to Dan was found to be too small, so a party of them went far north to Leshem or Laish, which they took and destroyed. They built a city there and called it after their father Dan (Joshua 19:47). This is often named as the north border of Palestine; "from Dan to Beersheba" means the whole land. It was here that open idolatry was set up early.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The alarm enters the land by the same gate idolatry did.

Mount Ephraim: the hill country of the ten tribes

The second name is not a single peak but a whole region:

This does not refer to any particular mountain, but to the range of hill-country in Ephraim.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Ephraim also stands for more than one tribe. The prophets use it for the ten tribes as a group, set over against Judah:

Ephraim is not only the name of one tribe. It is also the general name for the ten tribes who gathered under that leading tribe. Judah and Ephraim are the two main titles the prophets use, again and again, to contrast the two houses of Israel.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The affliction announced has a name

The "trouble" relayed down the road was not vague dread. Commentators identify the force behind it:

Ignorance of God and injustice were bringing on the nation the same chaos that overtook the creation of Genesis 1:1. There was no man to save the sorrowful situation. Therefore the instrument of God's anger is raised up! The event to which the book points is to take place! Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sound is heard! Evil comes and a great destruction!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Jeremiah had already been shown this from the start of his ministry:

This is the first definite announcement of the coming judgment from the north, which Jeremiah had seen in the vision of the boiling pot toward the north (chapter 1). The lion who comes, the destroyer of the Gentiles, who makes the land desolate, is Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the news is bad news

The reported disaster is not an accident of politics. Reading the section this verse belongs to, one writer traces the cause back to the people themselves:

The doom of Jerusalem and Judah is sealed; there can be no escape. Their ways and their doings brought all upon them. And when Jeremiah hears it from the lips of the Lord, he breaks out in a lament: "My anguish, my anguish! I writhe in pain! Oh the walls of my heart! My heart is beating wildly; I cannot keep silent, for I hear the sound of the trumpet, the alarm of war."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Yet the prophecy reaches further than one invasion:

All this was a vision of the trouble hanging over the Jews, and in fact over the nations as a whole. This prophecy goes far beyond the harm Nebuchadnezzar did. It also takes in judgments of repayment that are still to come.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A voice sent ahead of the sword

The voice speaks before the army arrives. God announces before He acts:

It is God's way, before drawing His sword, to sound the trumpet. Turn to Ezekiel 33:4-5 and you will see this clearly: "But if anyone hears the sound of the trumpet and does not take warning, and the sword comes and takes him away, his blood shall be upon his own head." So before God destroyed the earth by water, He sounded the warning trumpet through Noah. And in our own time, before the last stroke falls, His trumpet sounds out in the gospel call. Will you not heed it, and seek salvation while you may? "Is a trumpet blown in a city, and the people are not afraid?" (Amos 3:6).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Another writer states the purpose:

Why announce so widely and publicly that He is going to carry out judgment? Only so that people will take the sentence home to themselves, and so remove the need to carry it out at all. He speaks it aloud; He says it in people's ears, so that they may turn to Him. No soul ever turned to Him with a sense of coming judgment and failed to find mercy from Him — the freest and fullest mercy possible.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Voice — The alarm starts at Dan, the land's northern border, where open idolatry began. It travels down through the hill country of Ephraim.

- Verdict — The trouble has a name. Nebuchadnezzar, the destroyer from the north, is coming — the judgment Jeremiah first saw in the vision of the boiling pot.

- Cause — The disaster came from inside, not outside. The people's own ways and doings brought it on them, and the doom was sealed.

- Warning — The voice comes before the sword, and that is mercy. God sounds the trumpet first, so judgment announced can prevent judgment carried out.

- Reach — The vision runs past Babylon to judgments still to come, and past Judah to the nations. That is why the same call still sounds in the gospel today.

Jeremiah 4:16 · Darby

Inform the nations; behold, make Jerusalem to hear Besiegers come from a far country, and raise their voice against the cities of Judah.

God tells Jeremiah to spread the news, not to hide it: the nations and Jerusalem must hear that an army from a far country is marching on the towns of Judah. Why does God announce a disaster before He sends it, and whose hand moves this army?

The alarm from the north

The news concerns one invader, already on the move. God Himself raises him up against a nation sliding into ruin.

From Jeremiah 4:3 to the end of Jeremiah 6 the prophet Jeremiah deals with the state of Israel... ignorance of God and injustice were bringing the same chaos upon the nation. There was no man to save the sorrowful situation! So God raises up the instrument of His anger! The event the whole book points to is about to happen! Nebuchadnezzar—the lion of Babylon—the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard goes up! The trumpet sounds! Evil comes, and a great destruction!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A far country, but not a free hand

The besiegers come from far away, yet they arrive on God's timetable. Their day is the day God's patience with Judah ran out.

He was the man in whom God set up the Gentiles. The house of David, the throne of Judah, had corrupted itself. The measure of the people's iniquity was full. God's patience had run out in Nebuchadnezzar's day. So the Lord used him as the rod of His anger against Jerusalem, and as the hand that took from Him the sword of rule and judgment in the earth.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

God had named this king long before, and had named what would bring him.

Here the Lord brings in Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, the great oppressor of the Jews of whom He had warned. He had told His people what was coming if they did not repent, and they had not repented. Now He announces that He will send and take all the families of the north, and Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, His servant.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the announcement comes first

God announces the army before the army arrives. This is His way, not a one-off.

It is God's way before drawing His sword to sound the trumpet. Turn, please, to Ezekiel 33:4-5, and you will see this plainly. "Then if anyone who hears the sound of the trumpet does not take warning, and the sword comes and takes him away, his blood shall be upon his own head. He heard the sound of the trumpet and did not take warning." So before God destroyed the earth by water, He sounded the warning trumpet through Noah. In our own time, before the last blow falls, His trumpet sounds in the gospel call. Will you not listen to it, and seek salvation while you may?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What put the besiegers on the road

The reason for the siege lies in Judah itself, and the outcome is already fixed.

The doom of Jerusalem and Judah is sealed; there can be no escape. Their ways and their doings brought all upon them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A message aimed at the conscience

This message aims at the conscience, and the man carrying it feels every word.

The book of Jeremiah is mostly testimony spoken straight to the conscience of the people. It deals with their moral condition at the time the prophet speaks, and it looks ahead to the judgment hanging over them... The prophet's heart was overwhelmed with grief, because he loved the people. At the same time, he was filled with a deep sense of their relationship with the Lord.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

How such warnings should be carried

Anyone who passes such a warning on must watch how they do it.

As faithful witnesses for God, it is our duty to warn an evil world of the judgment appointed. Woe to us if we fail to sound the warning! But how do we do it? Is it in a stern spirit of denunciation, or is it with trembling lips and compassionate hearts? Have we forgotten that, but for the infinite grace of God and the costly sacrifice of the Lord Jesus, we would be in the lake of fire ourselves?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The siege begins in Judah's own conduct, not in Babylon's ambition — "their ways and their doings brought all upon them."

- Instrument. The army from a far country is real, but it moves as a rod in God's hand, sent when the measure of iniquity was full.

- Warning. God sounds the trumpet before He draws the sword. The warning to Jerusalem is mercy arriving ahead of the marching feet.

- Target. The word aims at the conscience. It should change the hearer while there is still time.

- Carrier. God gave the warning to a man with a broken heart. Carry it the same way: with trembling lips, never with cold scorn.

Jeremiah 4:17 · Darby

As keepers of a field are they against her round about; for she hath been rebellious against me, saith Jehovah.

Watchers ring Jerusalem on every side, like men set to guard a field. The verse gives the reason: the city has rebelled against the LORD. Two questions follow — who brings this army, and what in the people put it there.

The army from the north

The force around the city has a name, and a stated cause.

Jeremiah 4 summons the people to return to the Lord, and to return in truth of heart. Otherwise His fury will break out and burn like fire. Let the trumpet gather the people to the fortified cities, for destruction comes from the north. It is Nebuchadnezzar… The prophet next tells Jerusalem plainly that these bitter things come on her for her sins. Then he pours out the grief of his own anguished heart at the horrors hanging over the guilty but beloved city and land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"Rebellious" as a settled description

"Rebellious" is one word in a longer list the book uses for this nation. Every term in it sat beside a busy religious life.

Every kind of shameful moral impurity marked the people, priests, prophets and elders. Men were offering to false gods and their women baking cakes to the Queen of heaven. They are foolish (Jer. 5:21), deceitful (Jer. 5:27), stupid (Jer. 4:22), hopeless (Jer. 3:25), rebellious (Jer. 4:17), treacherous (Jer. 3:7), and brazen (Ezek. 2:4)… Remember too, that they had their religion. How like the Christian world today. They boasted of the ark of the covenant… The temple too was their lying boast but they had made it a den of thieves.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

Where the rebellion began

One writer traces the whole collapse back to a single starting point, and lists this verse among the steps of the decline.

The Lord appeals to Israel through the prophet Jeremiah. From that appeal we learn that the ruin of the nation, in its responsibility, comes from one source. They lost the love for the LORD with which they began their history as a people called out from the nations. The Lord tenderly reminds them of their early love… That was how their history began. But now the Lord has to say, "You have forsaken the LORD your God." He called them to repent. They failed to do so, and judgment overtakes the nation. (Jer. 2:2, 13, 19; 3:12, 14, 22; 4:11, 17).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why the watchers had any power

The verse puts the cause with the city, not with her attackers. An earlier moment in Israel's history shows the same rule at work.

First of all, we are reminded that the power of any enemy is put in his hands by the unfaithfulness of God's people. "The children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord; and the Lord delivered them into the hand of Midian seven years." No might of Midian could or would have won if the Lord had not permitted it. And He would not have permitted it if Israel's condition had not made it necessary. Those who will not learn in communion with God, must learn in the hands of the enemy.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The only way the ring is broken

If rebellion against the LORD is the cause, the cure has to reach that far. One writer states the terms, and states them for every age.

A return must be a return to Him, the LORD; anything less is not enough. Their abominations must be judged and put away. Every return of people who have drifted away must be the same. It is a true return to the Lord, with confession of sin, self-judgment, and evil given up. The circumcision of the heart means regeneration.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Judgment with a limit

The judgment falls, but the chapter still holds something back from it.

Israel made high claims, but they did not know the Lord! They were "stupid children" with "no understanding". They were "wise to do evil", but they had no knowledge of how to do good (Jer. 4:22). Woe and anguish must therefore come on them (v. 31). But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. Such turn in reality to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him (Jer. 4:27 and 5:18); therefore, He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Heart first. The ruin goes back to one source: they lost the love for the LORD they began with.

- Heart hardens. Cooled love hardened into a settled description: rebellious, treacherous, deceitful. And all the while they boasted in the temple and the ark.

- Heart exposed. The watchers had only the power that unfaithfulness put in their hands. Those who will not learn in communion with God learn in the hands of the enemy.

- Heart named. Nebuchadnezzar came from the north. But Jeremiah told Jerusalem why: these bitter things came on her for her sins.

- Heart restored. Only a return to Him counts: confession, self-judgment, evil given up. For the remnant true in heart, God will not make a full end.

Jeremiah 4:18 · Darby

Thy way and thy doings have procured these [things] unto thee; this is thy wickedness, yea, it is bitter, yea, it reacheth unto thy heart.

An army is closing in on Jerusalem, and God names the cause: not the invader, but Judah herself. Her own ways brought this on her, and the bitterness has gone as deep as the heart.

The verdict spoken plainly

At verse 18 the prophet stops describing the disaster and starts explaining it. One commentator sums up the turn:

The prophet next tells Jerusalem plainly that these bitter things happen to her because of her sins. Then he pours out the lament of his own anguished heart over the horrors hanging over the guilty but beloved city and land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer states the sentence and its cause:

The doom of Jerusalem and Judah is sealed; there can be no escape. Their ways and their doings brought all of it upon them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Not an arbitrary sentence

If a people's own ways and doings bring the result, judgment is not a random blow. It follows a law:

This is no arbitrary thing. The law is the same physically and morally — "Whatever one sows, that will he also reap." In the true sense here, man is the maker of his own destiny.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

The same rule touches believers. One writer draws a careful distinction:

No doubt, in such a case, the Father may use the necessary consequences of past sin as a present discipline for the soul of His child. But we tend to see this and similar cases as examples of that great and solemn governmental rule: "Whatever one sows, that will he also reap." You may see men suffering all their lifetime the natural consequences of past folly and excess. We must learn to tell the difference between the way grace acts and the way God's government acts. Grace pardons and restores; but government takes its course. If you sow weeds, you cannot reap wheat. Grace can pardon your folly in sowing the weeds, but it will not change the crop.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Wickedness that corrects the sinner

Earlier in the book God had already told Israel that her own evil would be her teacher and her backsliding her rebuke. Commenting on that verse, one writer applies it to the reader without softening it:

After their redemption, neither Egypt nor Assyria had anything to do with Israel until they got away from God. But their hearts, away from God, longed for evil company, and received their due reward… But if I am away from Him, and His hand is on me, I cannot blame Him. Is the blame His? Ah no, I know Him too well to say that.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Bitterness that reaches the heart

The verse does not stop at calling the doom bitter. It says the bitterness has reached the heart. And the Lord who sends it is not detached from it:

They have "forsaken Me!" they have "forgotten Me!" they have "turned their backs to Me!" He says again and again. This shows how He felt their treatment and the bitter suffering they were bringing upon themselves… It is indeed very touching to think of this rejected love, this love divine.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why the heart, and not just the city

Bitterness that reaches the heart has a purpose. Jeremiah's own work aimed at the same place:

While foretelling the doom coming on Jerusalem by the hand of Nebuchadnezzar, Jeremiah works to reach the heart of the people… The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the Lord", the circumcision which touches the heart, preparing it for Him. With pleadings and warnings he works to reach them. It is the same today. Unless we have been reached in the heart, and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. That is true even though, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What God keeps

The judgment is not the last word. The same writer points to those God keeps:

But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. They truly turn to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him; so He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Your way. The invading army was real, but the cause was closer to home: their ways and their doings brought all of it upon them.

- Your harvest. The rule is not arbitrary. What a man sows, he reaps — so in this sense man is the maker of his own destiny.

- Your blame. When God's hand falls on us after we have walked away from Him, we cannot blame Him. Grace pardons the folly; it does not change the crop.

- Your heart. The bitterness does not stop at the surface. It reaches the heart — and a heart left unreached leaves a person alienated from God, even with the name and the forms of religion.

- His love. Behind the whole charge stands a God who says over and over that they have forsaken Him and forgotten Him. He feels their treatment of Him and the bitter suffering they bring on themselves — and He still keeps a remnant for Himself.

Jeremiah 4:19 · Darby

My bowels! my bowels! I am in travail! [Oh,] the walls of my heart! My heart maketh a noise in me; I cannot hold my peace for thou hearest, my soul, the sound of the trumpet, the clamour of war.

The chapter has just announced a destroyer coming from the north, and now the man carrying that warning feels it in his own body. Why does the messenger hurt like this, and whose voice is really crying here?

Where the cry falls in the chapter

The lament is not a random outburst. It comes after the prophet has named the invader and told the city why he is coming.

Jeremiah 4 summons the people to return to the Lord, and this in truth of heart, in case His fury breaks out and burns like fire. Let the trumpet gather them to the fortified cities, for destruction comes from the north. It is Nebuchadnezzar… The prophet next tells Jerusalem plainly that these bitter things come on her for her sins. Then he pours out the lament of his own anguished heart over the horrors hanging over the guilty but beloved city and land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What set his heart shaking

What shakes him is bigger than an army at the gates. In the verses that follow he sees an emptied, ruined earth, and one writer reads that vision as larger than the Babylonian invasion.

The coming disasters are so vast that the vision before him reminds us of the chaotic state of the world described at the very beginning of Genesis. … All this was a vision of the trouble hanging over the Jews, and in fact over the nations as a whole. This prophecy goes far beyond what Nebuchadnezzar inflicted. It also includes punishing judgments still to come.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Whose anguish?

Commentators differ over who is speaking. One takes the cry as Jeremiah's own reaction to what he has heard from the Lord:

The doom of Jerusalem and Judah is sealed; there can be no escape. Their ways and their doings brought it all on them. And when Jeremiah hears it from the lips of the Lord, he breaks out in a lament.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Another reads the same words as God's own grief in vivid figures. He hears that same Person weeping again over the same people.

Listen to the lament of Jehovah in the book of Jeremiah, in highly figurative language, when He says, "My anguish, my anguish! I writhe in pain!" (Jeremiah 4:19-22). Then compare the words of the same blessed Person when He lived here on earth and wept over the deluded people, saying, "If you had only known…" (Luke 19:41-44).

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

He felt their ruin as his own

Either way, the prophet does not stand at a safe distance from the people he warns. He loves them, and their ruin has become his own.

Like our Lord Jesus Christ, the prophet loved Israel and Jerusalem. He felt how real their sorrowful state was. Jeremiah entered into it so deeply that we find him crying out, "My anguish, my anguish! I writhe in pain!" (Jer. 4:19). And as though their desolation were his own, he cries, "My joy is gone; grief is upon me; my heart is sick within me" (Jer. 8:18).

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

How to warn others

His tears set a pattern for anyone who has to warn others that judgment is coming.

Jeremiah, the weeping prophet, takes up the same sorrowful song… His tears remind us how a poor sinner saved by grace should warn other sinners of coming judgments. The spirit should be one of weeping appeal, not stern, harsh condemnation and rebuke.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Why the heart

The pain lands in the heart. Earlier in the chapter the prophet points to the cure in the same place, and one writer turns it straight on the reader.

The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the Lord," the circumcision that touches the heart and prepares it for Him. With pleadings and warnings he works to reach them. It is the same today. Unless we are reached in the heart and in the spirit, at the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. That holds even when, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion… But, as always, God keeps a remnant.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Heard. The cry follows the news of the destroyer from the north. The doom is settled, and the prophet has just heard it from the Lord.

- Felt. What he heard did not stay information — he felt their coming desolation as if it were his own.

- Shared. Commentators differ. The anguish is Jeremiah's, or it is God's own grief in figurative language. On the second reading, the same Person later weeps over the people.

- Spoken. Real pain shaped the warning: weeping appeal, not harsh rebuke. That is the model for anyone who warns others.

- Aimed. The pain reaches the walls of the heart, and so does the cure: a circumcision of the heart. Without it, religion is only a form — yet God keeps a remnant.

Jeremiah 4:20 · Darby

Destruction upon destruction is proclaimed; for the whole land is wasted suddenly are my tents laid waste, my curtains, in a moment.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jeremiah 4:21 · Darby

How long shall I see the standard, [and] hear the sound of the trumpet?

The chapter fills with the noise of an invading army. Here the prophet asks how long he must watch the war-banner and hear the war-trumpet. He is not asking about dates. His own heart is breaking over what he sees.

What Jeremiah Sees and Hears

The standard and the trumpet belong to one advancing army. Commentators name it.

From Jeremiah 4:3 to the end of Jeremiah 6 the prophet deals with the state of Israel. Like the chaos that overtook the distant creation of Genesis 1:1, ignorance of God and injustice were bringing the same upon the nation. There was no man to save the sorrowful situation! So the instrument of God's anger is raised up! The event the book points to is about to take place! Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sound is heard! Evil comes, and a great destruction!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why the Alarm Does Not Stop

The verses around this cry trace the disaster back to its source.

Verses 14-22. The doom of Jerusalem and Judah is sealed; there can be no escape. Their ways and their doings brought all upon them. And when Jeremiah hears it from the lips of the Lord, he breaks out in a lament.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The Heart Behind the Ruin

Circumcision was the outward mark of belonging to God's people. Jeremiah asks for the inward reality instead.

The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the Lord", the circumcision which touches the heart, preparing it for Him. With pleadings and warnings he labours to reach them. It is the same today. Unless we are reached in the heart and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. We may still, like these Jews, call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion. What good is their claim to be a religious nation, if the Lord is not exalted? … Israel made high claims, but they did not know the Lord! They were "stupid children", they had "no understanding", they were "wise — in doing evil", but how to do good they did not know.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A Prophet Who Feels What He Foretells

The cry of this verse comes from a man who has taken his nation's ruin into himself.

Like our Lord Jesus Christ, the prophet loved Israel and Jerusalem. He truly felt their sorrowful state. He entered into it so deeply that we find him crying out, "My anguish, my anguish! I writhe in pain!" And just as if their desolation were his own, he cries, "My joy is gone; grief is upon me; my heart is sick within me."

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Commentators read that combination — faithful warning and real tears — as a picture of Christ.

Jeremiah was the faithful Jew in his day; he witnessed the sin and foretold, even weeping, the sorrows of his people. And so the Lord in His day stood in the middle of the evil, alone faithful. As a second weeping Prophet, He told of the coming judgments on the daughter of His people. In Jeremiah we have the Christ, not as the Lamb of God, but as the Kinsman, the faithful weeping Prophet of Israel. And it is in this character that we must hear Him saying, "Is it nothing to you, all you who pass by?"

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Trumpet That Gathers

The trumpet here is a war signal. But it is not the only trumpet Scripture knows.

Among the prophets the trumpet is generally linked with war and nothing more. Jeremiah puts it this way: "I hear the sound of the trumpet, the alarm of war." Yet a few passages leave a very strong impression on the mind. Isaiah 27:13 is one: "And in that day a great trumpet will be blown, and those who were lost in the land of Assyria and those who were driven out to the land of Egypt will come and worship the LORD on the holy mountain at Jerusalem."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Jeremiah's own chapter also sets a limit to the ruin.

The prophet then sees what will happen to the land of Israel after the threatened judgment has passed over it. Only Israel's land is in view. We must not overlook that the Lord said: "The whole land shall be a desolation; yet I will not make a full end." This is Israel's hope.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Heart — The banner and trumpet expose more than a military problem. They expose a heart untouched by God. Priests and a form of religion could not take its place.

- Harvest — "Their ways and their doings brought all upon them." The army from the north is the crop of what Judah sowed.

- Hearing — The trumpet announces a doom already sealed. There is no escape from it.

- Hurt — The man who announces the ruin is the man broken by it, and in that he pictures the Lord, the second weeping Prophet.

- Hope — A greater trumpet is still to sound, and it gathers the scattered home. The land lies desolate, but God will not make a full end.

Jeremiah 4:22 · Darby

For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have no intelligence; they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge.

Judgment is closing in on Judah, and God gives His own diagnosis of the people He still calls "my people." Their problem is not a lack of ability. They are experts — but only in one direction. Behind that skill lies what the verse names first: they do not know Him.

The root of the ruin

Commentators trace the nation's collapse back to one cause. One writer sums it up in a sentence:

No power will be found anywhere because God was forsaken.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same charge runs on through chapters 4 to 6:

In these chapters (4 to 6), the Lord again declares the cause of all their distress. He says, "They have forsaken Me, they have not known Me, they do not fear Me" (Jer. 4:22; 5:7, 19, 22).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What "foolish" and "sottish" mean

The verse calls them "stupid children." Older translations use the word "sottish." A Bible dictionary traces it:

Foolish. Jer. 4:22. Anglo-Saxon, sot, stupid.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Jeremiah's other words for this people fill out the picture:

They are foolish (Jer. 5:21), deceitful (Jer. 5:27), sottish (Jer. 4:22), hopeless (Jer. 3:25), rebellious (Jer. 4:17), treacherous (Jer. 3:7)… This was the state of things that Jeremiah and the remnant had to meet. Remember too, that they had their religion.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

Religion without knowing God

Knowing God is not the same as belonging to a religious people. One writer turns that on the reader:

Unless God has reached us in the heart and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are strangers to the living God. That is true even though, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion. What good is their claim to be a religious nation if the Lord is not exalted!… Israel made high claims, but they did not know the Lord!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Ignorance that is guilt

Is this a failure of ability? One writer says no:

It is true that the mind of man is a marvellous creation… but he has lost the knowledge of God by sin, and all desire for that knowledge. "No one understands; no one seeks for God." The guilt is not in the capacity, but in the will. "People loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil."… The prophets declare of Israel… "For my people are foolish; they know me not."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The word itself carries the point. Israel was not short of teaching:

Remember that the word "ignorance" comes from the word "ignore." Israel had ignored the clear teaching they were given, so they were ignorant… "If anyone's will is to do God's will, he will know whether the teaching is from God" (John 7:17). An obedient heart will always have understanding.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

The exact reverse of God's desire

Their cleverness ran one way only: quick in evil, blank in good. God wants that order reversed, and one writer sets the two verses side by side:

"I want you to be wise as to what is good and innocent as to what is evil" (Rom. 16:19; compare Jer. 4:22). Dwelling on evil does not by itself improve the state of our soul. If the Lord shows it to us, it is not so that we should be taken up with it. No, He would have us in the enjoyment of Himself, despite the mischief which Satan has worked.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

But how do you avoid an evil you have never studied?

The wisdom of the world must know its tricks to avoid them. But God has a path of His own in the world, one that wisdom has marked out… Once I learn this, I need not know all the evil, or any of it. I will walk in the wise and holy path I know, and I need not know the rest… If I know the one right path across the wasteland, I need not learn all the paths that lost themselves in it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

No man — until the Man

So was there no hope left? One writer looks past the ruin:

There was no man to stand in the gap. No one carried out justice. No one even looked for the truth… Both the land and the nation must wait for the return of "The Man Christ Jesus," raised from among the dead, of the seed of David, now hidden in the heavens. They will not wait in vain!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Not knowing — the verse names the root. A people who forsake God, do not know Him and do not fear Him lose every power they thought they had.

- Not unable — the fault is in the will, not the capacity. "Ignorance" comes from "ignore," and an obedient heart always gains understanding.

- Not enough — priests and the name "people of God" leave a person a stranger to God unless He has reached the heart itself.

- Not reversed — they were expert in evil and blank in good. God wants the opposite: wise in good, innocent about evil, walking one known path instead of studying every wrong one.

- Not abandoned — no man was found to stand in the gap then. But the waiting is not wasted: it points to the Man Christ Jesus, and those who wait will not wait in vain.

Jeremiah 4:23 · Darby

I beheld the earth, and lo, it was waste and empty; and the heavens, and they had no light.

Jeremiah looks out over a ruined land and describes it with the words Genesis uses for the earth when it was without form and dark. That raises two questions: is he looking back to creation's beginning or forward to a coming ruin, and how far does that ruin reach?

Words Pointing Forward, Not Backward

So the first question is what those borrowed words are doing here. One writer answers it directly:

Jeremiah 4:23 uses these same terms, and clearly points back to Genesis. There the prophet writes with the land of Israel in view, and the judgments hanging over it... So it is not a vision looking back to an original condition at all. It looks forward to the total desolation God would bring on one particular land. The terms are taken on purpose from the second verse of Genesis 1.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Older translations put the phrase as "waste and empty." The same writer checks where else it appears, and what the darkened heavens add to it:

There are only two other occasions: Isaiah 34:11, "the line of confusion [or waste] and the stones of emptiness," and Jeremiah 4:23, "I looked on the earth, and there it was, waste and emptiness." In both it is a desolation inflicted, not the original condition. So it is in Genesis 1:2. This is all the more worth noting because Jeremiah says of the heavens at this time that "they had no light."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Vision That Outruns Its Own Century

What Jeremiah sees is a vision, and it is too large to fit inside the invasion under Nebuchadnezzar:

All this was a vision of the trouble that was hanging over the Jews, and, in fact, over the nations generally. This prophecy goes far beyond what Nebuchadnezzar inflicted, and includes retributive judgments still future.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Commentators differ over how far ahead the vision reaches. One writer sets it beside another prophecy of the end and argues the two cannot describe the same moment:

In what is quoted from Jeremiah 4:23-27, if it is parallel, the Lord declares He will not make a full end... Jeremiah and Haggai cannot both apply, because Haggai 2:21, the apostle tells us, means the end; and in Jeremiah, the Lord tells us, He does not.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Moral State Behind the Ruin

One writer reads the vision alongside the times Jeremiah lived in:

What vivid language! In the prophet's vision the whole scene seems reduced to the chaos and darkness of the very beginning... These were times marked by deep-seated and widespread corruption of every kind. High and low, rich and poor, educated and uneducated, prophets, priests, and people — all of them showed a shocking picture of hollowness, deceit, and heartless wickedness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Warning Through Tears

The vision does not leave Jeremiah cold. His grief sets the tone for anyone who has to warn others of judgment:

Jeremiah, the weeping prophet, takes up the sorrowful song, and adds his testimony to everything that has now been told. How his tears remind us of the spirit in which a poor sinner saved by grace should warn other sinners of coming judgments! It is the spirit of weeping appeal, not of stern, harsh condemnation and rebuke.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

The Boundary of Mercy

The ruin is real, yet God will not make a full end. One writer shows what Jeremiah was pressing for, and who the mercy is kept for:

The prophet looks for true circumcision "to the Lord" — the circumcision that touches the heart and prepares it for Him... Israel made great claims, but they did not know the Lord!... So trouble and anguish had to come on them. But, as always, God keeps a remnant. These people really do turn to the Lord Himself, and their hearts are true to Him. That is why He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Undone. The words come from Genesis 1:2 on purpose. This is creation running backwards — a state God reduces a land to, not the state He made it in.

- Deserved. The emptiness outside matched the emptiness inside. A whole society — prophets, priests and people — was hollow and deceitful.

- Wider. The vision outgrows Nebuchadnezzar's invasion. It takes in trouble hanging over the nations and judgments still to come.

- Wept over. Jeremiah weeps at what he sees, and that is the pattern for anyone who warns others — appeal through tears, not harsh condemnation.

- Limited. God stops short of a full end. He keeps a remnant who turn to Him in heart, and mercy draws the line judgment cannot cross.

Jeremiah 4:24 · Darby

I beheld the mountains, and lo, they trembled, and all the hills shook violently.

Jeremiah sees his land as it will look after God's anger has passed over it. Even the mountains — the steadiest things a person can see — are shaking. Two questions follow: where does this language come from, and how far does the ruin reach?

A vision, not a report

What Jeremiah describes had not happened yet. William Kelly reads it as a preview of disaster, pictured in words drawn from the opening of the Bible:

The coming disasters are so mighty that the vision before him reminds us of the chaotic state of the world at the very beginning of Genesis. … All this was a vision of the trouble hanging over the Jews, and, in fact, over the nations as a whole. This prophecy goes far beyond what Nebuchadnezzar did. It takes in judgments that repay wrongdoing and are still future.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Genesis words used in reverse

The phrase "without form and void" in the previous verse is the same wording used of the earth in Genesis 1:2. Kelly argues the direction of the picture is forward, not backward — Jeremiah is not describing how the world began:

Jeremiah 4:23 uses these same terms, and plainly points back to Genesis. There the prophet writes with the land of Israel in view, and the judgments hanging over it. … This is not at all a vision looking back to the world's first condition. It looks forward to the utter desolation God would bring on one particular land. The wording comes deliberately from the second verse of Genesis 1.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Mountains and hills

Psalm 72 pairs the same two words in a scene of blessing rather than ruin. There a commentator explains what each one stands for:

"The mountains," pictures of firmly established power, "shall bring peace to the people; and the hills" (the lesser governing authorities), "by righteousness." The perfect fairness of the Head shows itself in all who are His representatives.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

(The comment quotes Psalm 72:3 in an older translation.)

Read that way, Jeremiah's trembling mountains and shifting hills are more than geology. The structures a nation counted on as immovable are loose and moving.

How far the ruin reaches

Commentators differ on the scope. Kelly extends it to the nations and to judgments still future. Arno Gaebelein restricts it, and warns against stretching it over the entire globe:

Then the prophet has a vision of what will happen to the land of Israel, once the judgment threatened above has passed over it. … Only Israel's land is in view. Do not overlook what the Lord said: "The whole land shall be a desolation; yet I will not make a full end." This is Israel's hope.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

That last clause carries the hope. The ruin sweeps the whole land, yet God sets His own limit on His own anger.

Why the land was shaken

The vision is not arbitrary. C. H. Mackintosh, surveying the opening chapters of Jeremiah for the state of the nation in those days, ties the scene of chaos directly to the moral condition that produced it:

What vivid language! In the prophet's vision the whole scene seems reduced to the chaos and darkness of the beginning. … These were plainly times marked by deep-seated and widespread corruption, in every shape and form. High and low, rich and poor, learned and ignorant, prophets, priests, and people — all presented a shocking picture of hollowness, deceit, and heartless wickedness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The tone of the one who saw it

Jeremiah does not report this coldly. W. Trotter draws a lesson from how the prophet delivers his message, and applies it to anyone who warns others of judgment today:

His tears remind us of this. When a poor sinner saved by grace warns fellow sinners of coming judgments, the spirit should be one of tearful pleading, not of stern, harsh denouncing and rebuke.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Summary

- Condition. The vision belongs to a time of deep, widespread corruption, from prophets and priests down to the people.

- Picture. Jeremiah borrows the words of Genesis 1:2, but aims them forward. The chaos of the beginning becomes the image of a coming desolation.

- Reach. Mountains and hills stand for established power, great and small. When they move, nothing a nation leaned on stays standing.

- Limit. The whole land becomes a desolation, yet God says He will not make a full end. The boundary on His anger is Israel's hope.

- Manner. Jeremiah wept as he warned. In the darkest times true devotion shines brightest, and warning others belongs to tears, not harshness.

Jeremiah 4:25 · Darby

I beheld, and lo, man was not, and all the fowl of the heavens were fled.

Jeremiah's vision in this chapter runs backwards through creation. The light is gone, the mountains shake, and now the land is empty of people and even of birds. Two questions follow. How far does this ruin reach? And why does God describe it in the words of Genesis?

Creation Language in Reverse

The word choice is deliberate. One writer traces it back to the second verse of the Bible, and says the vision looks forward, not back:

Jeremiah 4:23 refers to these same terms, and clearly in allusion to Genesis. There the prophet writes in view of the land of Israel and the judgments approaching... That is, this is not at all a vision looking back to an original condition. It looks onward to the complete desolation God would bring on one particular land. The words are chosen on purpose from the second verse of Genesis 1... Genesis 1:2 describes the state, not in which God made the earth, but to which He later reduced it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

How Far the Ruin Reaches

Commentators differ on the scope. One reads the scene as stretching well past the Babylonian invasion of Jeremiah's own day:

The coming disasters are so great that the vision before him reminds us of the chaotic state of the world described at the very beginning of Genesis... All this was a vision of the trouble that was hanging over the Jews, and, in fact, over the nations generally. This prophecy goes far beyond what Nebuchadnezzar did. It also takes in judgments of retribution that are still future.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another keeps the scene inside one country, and finds hope in it:

Then the prophet has a vision of what will happen to the land of Israel, when the judgment threatened above has passed over it... only Israel's land is in view. We must not overlook what the Lord said: "The whole land shall be a desolation; yet I will not make a full end." This is Israel's hope.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"There Was No Man"

The missing man is the heart of the verse. Read one way it means an emptied land. Read another way, it means a nation with no one left who could hold it together:

In these chapters (4 to 6), the Lord again declares the cause of all their distress. He says, "They have forsaken Me, they have not known Me, they do not fear Me"... There was no man to stand in the breach. No one carried out justice. No one even sought the truth. What else could come! The desolation of such a nation, which had turned its back to the Lord, was inevitable.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The search ran from the top of society down, and failed everywhere:

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord... "I will go to the great men", said the prophet, but they were just as evil. The eyes of the Lord are upon truth, yet not one man could be found in agreement with it.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The Prophet Who Wept Over It

A man in pain reports this vision, and his tone is itself a lesson:

Jeremiah, the weeping prophet, takes up the sad song, and adds his testimony to all that has now been told. How his tears remind us of the spirit in which a poor sinner saved by grace should warn other sinners of coming judgments! It is the spirit of weeping appeal, not of stern, harsh condemnation and rebuke.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Judgment Stopped Short of the End

The chapter that empties the land refuses to close the book on Israel. God keeps a people for Himself inside the ruin:

Israel made high claims, but they did not know the Lord!... Woe and anguish must therefore come upon them. But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. These truly turn to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him. So He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The Man Who Was Wanted

Where the vision found no man, God's answer came in one Man:

Thanks be to God, we have no need now to cry out "A man wanted"! The king of Israel might fail as the head of the nation, or, even if he was faithful, he still died. The man Christ Jesus, however, who is the Head of the assembly today, never fails and never dies... No man, no mediator ever lived who could bring God and man together for lasting blessing. But now there is "one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus". With Him there is no failure.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — the desolation traces to one root: they had forsaken God, did not know Him, and did not fear Him.

- Picture — the words come from Genesis 1:2, so the scene reads like creation running in reverse. It looks forward to ruin, not back to it.

- Absence — from the king to the ordinary person, no one sought the truth. With no man to stand in the breach, collapse was certain.

- Limit — God keeps a remnant true to Himself, so He will not make a full end. Commentators differ on whether the vision covers Israel's land alone or reaches the nations.

- Answer — the man the land lacked has since come: the Mediator between God and men, who never fails and never dies.

Jeremiah 4:26 · Darby

I beheld, and lo, the fruitful land was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down, before Jehovah, before his fierce anger.

Jeremiah is describing a vision: a land stripped bare, its towns flattened, and the Lord's fierce anger behind it. Two questions follow — is this ruin past or still to come, and why would God send it on His own land?

A Vision Looking Forward, in the Words of Genesis

The words here echo the opening page of the Bible, where the earth is formless and empty. One commentator says Jeremiah is not looking back to that first state. He is looking ahead to ruin:

Jeremiah 4:23 uses these same terms, and clearly points back to Genesis. There the prophet writes with the land of Israel and the coming judgments in view... So this is not at all a vision looking back to the world's first condition. It is a vision looking forward to the complete desolation God would bring on one particular land. The words are taken on purpose from the second verse of Genesis 1.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Judgment Larger Than Babylon

The invasion from the north was the immediate fulfilment. The same commentator sees the vision reaching much further than that:

The coming disasters are so great that the vision before him reminds us of the chaotic state of the world described at the very beginning of Genesis... All this was a vision of the trouble hanging over the Jews, and, in fact, over the nations generally. This prophecy goes far beyond the damage Nebuchadnezzar did. It also takes in judgments of repayment that are still to come.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer notes that Jeremiah does not always speak only of his own nation:

It is true that Jeremiah's prophecies usually deal mainly, or even only, with his beloved nation and with Jerusalem, the city of his heart. In his day that city was beginning to fall prey to the destroyer of the nations. But this is not always the case.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

The Human Invader, the Divine Anger

The chapter names the invader. It also names the fury behind him, and the reason for it:

Jeremiah 4 calls the people to return to the Lord, and to do it with a true heart, in case His fury breaks out and burns like fire. Let the trumpet gather them into the fortified cities, for destruction comes from the north. It is Nebuchadnezzar... The prophet then tells Jerusalem plainly that these bitter things come on her because of her sins. He pours out the grief of his own aching heart at the horrors hanging over the guilty but beloved city and land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

He traces the collapse to its root:

No power will be found anywhere because God was forsaken.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ruin Outside, Corruption Inside

Another commentator sets the darkness of the vision beside the state of the people at that time:

What vivid language! In the prophet's vision the whole scene is reduced to the chaos and darkness of the world's beginning. In short, nothing could be more gloomy than the picture given here... These were plainly times marked by deep-seated and widespread corruption, in every shape and form. High and low, rich and poor, learned and unlearned, prophets, priests, and people all showed an appalling picture of hollowness, deceit, and heartless wickedness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Warning Others with Tears

What Jeremiah saw broke his heart. One writer holds that up as the pattern for anyone who passes on such a warning:

Jeremiah, the weeping prophet, takes up the sad song... His tears remind us how a poor sinner saved by grace should warn other sinners about coming judgments. The spirit should be one of weeping appeal, not of stern, harsh condemnation and rebuke.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause: The ruin came from the Lord's fierce anger against the nation's sins, not from Babylon's strength. Nebuchadnezzar was only the instrument.

- Collapse: The nation forsook God, so no power was left anywhere.

- Mirror: The empty land matched empty hearts. Deceit ran from the highest to the lowest.

- Reach: The vision uses the language of Genesis 1:2, yet it points forward — past Nebuchadnezzar, to judgments still to come.

- Manner: The prophet who saw all this wept. Warn others of judgment the same way — with tears, not harsh words.

Jeremiah 4:27 · Darby

For thus saith Jehovah The whole land shall be a desolation; but I will not make a full end.

The chapter has just laid out a scene of ruin. Then God Himself speaks and sets a limit on what He is doing. Two things stand side by side here: He will lay the land waste, and He will still stop short of wiping it out.

What Is Being Ruined

The vision is not a preview of the planet's destruction. One writer keeps it inside the borders of one country:

Then the prophet sees what will happen to the land of Israel, after the judgment threatened above has passed over it… only Israel's land is in view. We must not overlook what the Lord said: "The whole land shall be a desolation; yet I will not make a full end." This is Israel's hope.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The ruin did not stop with the Babylonian invasion of Jeremiah's own day. What Jeremiah saw is wider than Judah, and reaches further forward:

All this was a vision of the trouble that was hanging over the Jews, and, in fact, over the nations generally. This prophecy goes far beyond what Nebuchadnezzar did. It also takes in punishing judgments still in the future.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Force of "Full End"

The phrase is not vague. The same word turns up elsewhere for God's judgment carried out to the very end:

The word translated consumption, or consummation, is used elsewhere for God's judgments carried out in full… In Jeremiah translators render the same word "full end" in several passages (Jer. 4:27; Jer. 5:10, 18; Jer. 30:11; Jer. 46:28).

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

So the verse sets one thing against another. The ruin will be real. Even so, God refuses the last stroke, the one that would leave nothing to recover.

A Rule for Reading Prophecy

The verses just before this one are full of symbols. Some readers have taken them as a picture of the end of the world. One commentator replies that God's own words here rule that out. He sets Jeremiah beside a passage in Haggai that does speak of the end:

In what is quoted from Jeremiah 4:23-27, if it is parallel, the Lord declares that He will not make a full end. So the symbols plainly do not mean what people claim they mean… Jeremiah and Haggai cannot both apply. The apostle tells us that Haggai 2:21 means the end; and in Jeremiah, the Lord tells us that He does not.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

When a picture and a plain statement clash, the plain statement decides.

Why God Stops Short

The reason is not that the guilt was small. It lies in a small number inside the nation who are His:

But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. They turn in reality to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him (Jer. 4:27 and 5:18); therefore, He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The same writer turns the point on the reader:

It is the same today. Unless we have been reached in the heart, and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God, though like these Jews we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Promise Held Open

This limit is not a one-off. The same words come back in later chapters of Jeremiah. One writer sets Israel beside the nations, and points to the mercy that followed:

But in due time the Lord returned in mercy to Israel. His constant word to them is that "He will not contend with them for ever." Though He makes a full end of the nations, He will not make a full end of them. He visited and redeemed His people by giving them bread again.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Commentators differ on how wide the trouble spreads and how much of it still lies ahead. They do not differ on the promise. It means what it says.

Summary

- Desolation. God confirms the ruin before He limits it. He hands the land over to waste, and the verse never softens that.

- Limit. "Full end" is the language of judgment carried out to the last, and it is the one thing God says He will not do.

- Reason. He stops short because He keeps a remnant — those reached in the heart, true to Him while the nation collapses.

- Reach. The picture reaches past the Babylonian invasion to judgments still to come. The promise reaches that far too.

- Result. God makes a full end of nations; of Israel He never will. He will not contend forever, and He returns in mercy.

Jeremiah 4:28 · Darby

For this shall the earth mourn, and the heavens above be black; because I have spoken it, I have purposed it, and will not repent, neither will I turn back therefrom.

Jeremiah's vision in this chapter shows a land stripped back to emptiness. Verse 28 says why nothing will reverse it: God has spoken and purposed it. Two questions press on the reader. How far does this darkness reach? And can a God who speaks like this still show mercy?

The picture behind the words

The mourning earth and darkened heavens belong to a vision that starts a few verses earlier. One writer traces its wording straight back to the opening of Genesis:

Jeremiah 4:23 uses these same terms, and points straight back to Genesis. There the prophet writes with the land of Israel in view and the judgments hanging over it, and what he saw was a prophetic vision. It is not a vision looking back to the earth's first condition. It looks forward to the utter desolation God would bring on one particular land, and he chose his words from the second verse of Genesis 1.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Black as the colour of grief

Why do the heavens go dark? Some translations read "black" here, and writers treat that colour as a settled sign in Scripture, tied to famine and grief. It is the colour of the third horse in Revelation:

The black horse points to power that brings a time of grief and mourning. Here, as in Zechariah 6:2, the black horse follows the red. "Our skin was black," says the weeping prophet, "like an oven because of the terrible famine" (see Lamentations 5:10; Jeremiah 4:28; Jude 13, and so on, for the symbolic force of this colour).

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The writer quotes an older translation of Lamentations here; his point rests on the colour black.

How wide the darkness spreads

The language sounds global. One writer keeps it to a single land, and anchors that in what God adds in the verse before:

Verses 23-31. Then the prophet has a vision of what will happen to the land of Israel once the judgment threatened above has passed over it. Some apply this passage to the whole earth and teach that when the Lord comes the whole earth will be laid waste. That teaching has no support in Scripture. As in Isaiah 24, only Israel's land is in view. We must not overlook what the Lord said: the whole land will be a desolation, yet He will not make a full end. This is Israel's hope.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Not exhausted by Babylon

Commentators differ on how far the scene reaches. Another writer sees the trouble spreading beyond the Jews to the nations, and running past Nebuchadnezzar's invasion into the future:

All this was a vision of the trouble hanging over the Jews, and in fact over the nations generally. This prophecy goes far beyond what Nebuchadnezzar inflicted, and includes judgments of repayment still to come.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why God does not change His mind

The heart of the verse is the refusal to relent. That refusal is not a mood. It belongs to what God is. One writer hears the same note in an older rendering of 1 Samuel 15:29, spoken to Saul as God took the kingdom from him:

In 1 Samuel 15:29 the prophet rebuked Saul for disobeying the command of Jehovah. He told him that the kingdom would now be torn from him, and then added: "the Strength of Israel will not repent, for He is not a man that He should repent." From this passage we learn that God is as faithful and sure in His judgments as in His grace. That is a solemn thought for anyone tempted to quibble at His severity.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The limit God sets on His own severity

Read alone, the verse sounds like the end of everything. But God has fixed a boundary, and He keeps a people inside it:

They were "foolish children," they had "no understanding," they were "wise to do evil," but to do good they had no knowledge (Jeremiah 4:22). Woe and anguish must therefore come upon them (v. 31). But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. Such people really do turn to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him (Jeremiah 4:27 and 5:18); therefore He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

How to carry a message like this

The prophet who delivers the sentence is the one whose heart breaks over it. That sets the tone for anyone who repeats such warnings:

Jeremiah, the weeping prophet, takes up the sorrowful song… His tears remind us how a poor sinner saved by grace should warn fellow sinners of coming judgments. The spirit should be one of weeping appeal, not stern, harsh condemnation and rebuke.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The vision takes its wording from Genesis 1:2 on purpose: God's judgment brings one land back to emptiness.

- Colour. Black is the settled sign of famine and grief in Scripture, so darkened heavens picture a land in mourning.

- Decree. God will not turn back, because He is not a man who changes His mind — He is as sure in His judgments as He is in His grace.

- Reach. Commentators differ: one keeps the desolation to Israel's land, another sees the trouble touching the nations and running past Nebuchadnezzar into judgments still to come.

- Limit. God's own promise not to make a full end is the hope inside the sentence: He always reserves a remnant true in heart to Him.

Jeremiah 4:29 · Darby

At the noise of the horsemen and bowmen, every city fleeth; they go into the thickets, and climb up upon the rocks every city is forsaken and no man dwelleth therein.

The noise of horsemen and archers alone is enough to empty a town, sending people into the bushes and up among the rocks. Who is behind this invasion, why has it come, and does the emptied land have any future at all?

The destroyer from the north

Earlier in the same chapter the prophet names the invader. He also says why no strength is left to resist him.

So he says later in the chapter, "A lion has gone up from his thicket, a destroyer of nations has set out." The lion is Nebuchadnezzar. "He has gone out from his place to make your land a waste; your cities will be ruins without inhabitant." "In that day, says the Lord, courage shall fail both king and princes. The priests shall be appalled and the prophets astounded." There would be no power anywhere, because the people had forsaken God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the towns stand empty

Looking at chapters 4 to 6 together, one writer finds the cause that God Himself names.

In these chapters (4 to 6) the Lord again declares the cause of all their distress. He says, "They have forsaken Me, they have not known Me, they do not fear Me." … There was no man to stand in the breach. There was no one who carried out justice. There was no one who even sought the truth. What else could come! The desolation of such a nation, which had turned its back on the Lord, was inevitable.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A scene that echoes the first chaos

The verses just before this one describe a land without form, without light and without a single person. One writer says that picture takes us back to the opening of Genesis.

The coming disasters are so great that the vision before him reminds us of the chaos the world was in at the very beginning of Genesis. … All this was a vision of the trouble hanging over the Jews, and in fact over the nations too. This prophecy goes far beyond the damage Nebuchadnezzar did. It also takes in judgments still to come, when God repays evil.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

How far the desolation reaches

How much land does this vision cover? One writer answers that, and points to the promise that keeps the ruin from being final.

Then the prophet has a vision. He sees what will happen to the land of Israel after the judgment threatened above has passed over it. … Only Israel's land is in view. Do not overlook what the Lord said: "The whole land shall be a desolation; yet I will not make a full end." This is Israel's hope.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The remnant God keeps

Why does God stop short of a full end? The same writer points to the people whose hearts really turn to Him.

But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. Such turn in reality to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him (Jer. 4:27 and 5:18); therefore He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Man who never fails

These chapters cry out for a man to meet the crisis, and no one comes. The answer, one writer says, is the Man God has now provided.

Thanks be to God, we have no need now to cry out "A man wanted"! The king of Israel might fail as the head of the nation, or, even if faithful, he still died. The Man Christ Jesus, however, who is the Head of the church today, never fails and never dies. The high priests of Israel were sometimes good and sometimes corrupt. But Jesus, the only High Priest provided for us now, is altogether perfect, and He continues forever. No mediator ever lived who could bring God and man together for lasting blessing. Now there is one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus. With Him there is no failure. … God has raised up a perfect Man, and everything is in safe keeping in His hands, for God's glory and for our blessing.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Flight — Nebuchadnezzar is the destroyer in view, and his advance leaves city after city empty.

- Cause — The people had forsaken God, they did not know Him and did not fear Him; so no strength was left in king, princes or priests.

- Reach — The vision recalls the chaos at the start of Genesis, and it reaches past Babylon to judgments still to come.

- Limit — Israel's land, not the whole earth, is in view, and the desolation stops short of a full end.

- Man — The crisis lacked a man to stand in the breach. Faith now has the Man Christ Jesus, who never fails and never dies.

Jeremiah 4:30 · Darby

-- And thou, wasted one, what wilt thou do? Though thou clothest thyself with crimson, though thou deckest thee with ornaments of gold, though thou rendest thine eyes with paint, in vain dost thou make thyself fair [thy] lovers despise thee, they seek thy life.

Jerusalem dresses for admiration at the very moment an army closes in from the north, and God asks her what she thinks she is doing. The chapter presses one question: can looking good save a people whose ruin God has already announced?

The invader at the gates

The chapter names the disaster on its way, and shows the prophet breaking down over it.

Destruction comes from the north. It is Nebuchadnezzar. The lion has come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the nations is on his way. He has gone out from his place to make your land desolate, and your cities will be laid waste, with no one living in them... The prophet next tells Jerusalem plainly that these bitter things fall on her because of her sins. Then he pours out the grief of his own anguished heart over the horrors hanging above the guilty but beloved city and land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the words describe

Enlarging the eyes with paint was a real cosmetic practice. Older translations put the phrase as "you tear your face with painting", and the Old Testament names other women who did the same thing.

Jezebel "painted her eyes," as 2 Kings 9:30 should read. Israel is compared to a lewd woman who painted her eyes. Ezekiel 23:40. "You tear your face with painting" in Jeremiah 4:30 means 'enlarging the eyes.' The eyelids and eyebrows were painted with antimony or some other pigment, which made the eyes look larger. Small bottles and the short sticks used to apply the moistened powder have been found in the tombs of Egypt.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Beauty that was a gift, spent elsewhere

The gold and fine clothing were gifts, not achievements. Kelly traces the same picture in Ezekiel.

"But you trusted in your beauty and played the whore because of your renown." It is a sorrowful picture, and just as true as it is sad... And this was the mark of it: her Maker was her divine husband, and all His countless favours she squandered on the filthy idols of the nations.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Lovers who turn into executioners

The ones she dressed for are the very ones who come for her.

When her day of lawless self-will is past, the day of the Lord finds all her former lovers gathered against her.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Ironside looks at the fallen city in Lamentations, and names the one love that held.

The false gods she trusted in when she broke faith with the covenant of the Lord are unable to ease her present sorrows in any way. The powers she tried to lean on when she forsook the Word of her God are all indifferent to her plight. He, the "eternal Lover" whom she has despised, is the only One who still loves her.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

Paint instead of a heart

"In vain you beautify yourself" is the verdict on every effort to fix the surface. Vine names what Jeremiah was after instead.

The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the Lord", the circumcision which touches the heart and prepares it for Him... It is the same today. Unless we have been reached in the heart and in the spirit, at the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. That stays true even though, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Mackintosh saw the same dressing-up in organised religion.

Religion, so called, is at this moment decking herself with her most powerful charms. She has cast off the coarseness of the middle ages. Now she calls in every resource of refined taste and of a cultivated, enlightened age.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The one way back

The chapter opens with the alternative to cosmetics, and it is a Person, not a programme.

The path of restoration is a return — not to outward observances, but to Himself, and nothing less. "If you will return, O Israel, declares the LORD, return to ME" (Jeremiah 4). As for His people — blessed be His Name — our God is satisfied with nothing less than their heart.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Paint. The picture is exact: enlarging the eyes with pigment, the practice of Jezebel and of the lewd woman of Ezekiel 23.

- Borrowed. The beauty on display was her Maker's gift, squandered on idols while she trusted in it as her own.

- Vain. No amount of decoration reaches the heart. A form of religion still leaves a person alienated from the living God.

- Betrayed. The lovers courted in the day of self-will gather against her in the day of the Lord, and none of them can comfort her.

- Return. The way back is not outward observance. It is the despised eternal Lover Himself, and He wants nothing less than the heart.

Jeremiah 4:31 · Darby

For I hear a voice, as of a woman in travail, anguish as of her that bringeth forth her first child, the voice of the daughter of Zion she moaneth, she spreadeth forth her hands, [saying], Woe unto me! for my soul faileth because of murderers.

Jeremiah 4 ends with the shock of invasion. The prophet hears Jerusalem cry like a woman in labour, but no child comes — only the words "I am fainting before murderers." Who are these murderers? And is a cry forced out by pain the same as turning back to God?

The prophet's own grief

The closing verses of the chapter are not a cool report of coming disaster. They are the prophet's heart breaking over people he loves and cannot save.

The prophet then tells Jerusalem plainly that these bitter things come on her because of her sins. Then he pours out the grief of his own aching heart. Horrors are hanging over the guilty but beloved city and land (verses 19–31).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who "the daughter of Zion" is

The figure is not a single woman, and not a picture of the church.

"Daughter of Zion" is a poetic expression for the inhabitants of the Jewish capital, and so for the people in general. "Daughters of Zion" would mean its female inhabitants instead. But we may add that it is nothing but ignorance to assume that Zion anywhere means the church of God, even as a metaphor.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the anguish had to come

The anguish has a reason behind it, and a limit set to it.

Israel made high claims, but they did not know the Lord! They were "stupid children," they had "no understanding," they were "wise to do evil." But they had no knowledge of how to do good (Jer. 4:22). Woe and anguish must therefore come upon them (v. 31). But, as always, God keeps a remnant. Such people really do turn to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him. So He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The murderers with a name

The killers closing in on Jerusalem come from the north. The whole chapter has been announcing them.

Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sounds! Evil comes, and a great destruction!

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

But the vision reaches wider than one invasion.

The coming disasters are so great that the vision reminds us of the chaos at the very beginning of Genesis. All this was a vision of the trouble hanging over the Jews, and in fact over the nations generally. This prophecy goes far beyond the damage Nebuchadnezzar did. It takes in judgments of punishment that are still to come.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same labour pains in Revelation

Another writer sets this cry beside the woman in labour in Revelation.

Revelation 12:2 says she "was crying out in birth pains and the agony of giving birth." The woman has been before us as a queen; now we see her as a mother. Her glory and majesty belong to the first relation, her suffering and pain to the second (Jer. 4:31). Who is the woman, and who is the child? The woman is ISRAEL. The child is CHRIST. The labour and the pain point to Israel's coming hour of trial, the great tribulation. The Messiah, the male child, was born long before it.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

Travail that ends in a birth

Labour pain is chosen deliberately, because labour has an end. Later in Jeremiah the same figure appears again, and there the outcome is stated.

We are reminded of a moment of great anguish which must come just before this is fully accomplished. It will be like the labour of a woman before the joy of a son's birth. "Alas!" cries the prophet, "for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even THE TIME OF JACOB'S TROUBLE; but he shall be saved out of it."

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The ESV renders that phrase "a time of distress for Jacob."

A scream is not repentance

Zion cries here, but the chapter never says she turns. Writing on the same pattern in Hosea, Kelly separates the two kinds of crying.

"They have not cried to Me from their heart," He says. They cried out when they were punished. But when they howled on their beds, they never cried to God from the heart. Judgment had no more moral effect on them than mercy had.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Vine puts the same test to the reader.

Unless we have been reached in the heart, and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are strangers to the living God — even if, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- The cry's cause. Jerusalem was clever at evil and knew nothing of doing good. This woe is the harvest of that verdict.

- The cry's owner. "Daughter of Zion" stands for the people of the city as a whole, not for one woman and not for the church.

- The cry's enemy. The murderers are Nebuchadnezzar's army from the north. Yet the vision reaches past him to judgments still to come.

- The cry's echo. Revelation shows the same woman in labour. Israel is the mother and Christ is the child.

- The cry's end. Labour pain ends in a birth. Jeremiah calls that worst hour Jacob's trouble, and says Jacob will be saved out of it. But a cry forced out by pain is not yet a cry from the heart.

Jeremiah 5:1 · Darby

Run ye to and fro through the streets of Jerusalem, and see now, and know, and seek in the broadways thereof, if ye can find a man, if there be [any] that doeth justice, that seeketh fidelity; and I will pardon it.

God tells Jeremiah to run through Jerusalem and look for one man who does justice and seeks truth. Find that one man, and God will pardon the whole city — but the search comes back empty.

The Search

The order was not a quick glance. It was a hunt through every layer of the city, and Jeremiah started at the bottom.

He said, "I will pardon the city for that one man." Jeremiah began with the poor of the city, with people who knew very little. He had to say of them, "Surely these are poor; they are foolish, for they do not know the way of the Lord, nor the judgment of their God" (verse 4). He went to the ordinary people first. Then he says, "I will go to the great men and speak to them, for they have known the way of the Lord and the judgment of their God; but these have completely broken the yoke and burst the bonds." He went to the poor, ordinary people who were sinning because they did not know better. Then he went to the great ones who were sinning and who did know better. So from the least to the highest he searched that city, and he could not find one righteous man.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

(Davison quotes verses 4 and 5 from an older translation.)

What God Was Looking For

The two marks God names — doing justice and seeking truth — had vanished from every level of the nation.

From the king down to the man in the street, no one was equal to the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord (Jer. 5:3-4)... The eyes of the Lord are on the truth, yet not one man agreed with it. The nation was in a pitiful state... God claimed recognition and honour in every circle, but in politics they were corrupt, in society they were degraded (Jer. 5:7-9), and in religion they had given themselves over to idolatry.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why Not Even One

Jerusalem's emptiness had a cause. Ironside traces it to the men who led the city's religion.

You might wonder why Jerusalem could not show a few righteous people, as Sodom did in an earlier day. Sadly, the ungodly priests and false prophets had killed them all or driven them away.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

Real Mercy in the Offer

The search had a purpose. Davison names the problem God wanted one man to solve:

God was seeking a man, one man, to solve the problem in that city. It was the problem that sin had brought in. Sin marked the people of God and had left them, at that moment, unfruitful in their service for God.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Yet pardon could not ignore what Jerusalem had become. Kelly presses the question:

How could the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He approve the worst corruption? Still, the judgment would have limits, even though they had denied the Lord and His discipline.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Man Who Was Found

The search failed. Other writers read God's call for a man as a question that stayed open until a Person answered it.

God could say to Jeremiah of the doomed city of Jerusalem, "Search her squares to see if you can find a man, one who does justice and seeks truth, that I may pardon her." We know that Man has been found: Christ is the "One mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus who gave Himself a ransom for all." Through this Man we are told to intercede for all men (1 Tim. 2:1-6).

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Davison finds that Man in John's Gospel:

If we turn to the fifth chapter of John's Gospel we see that righteous Man. A man had lain helpless by the pool of Bethesda for thirty-eight years, and his cry of distress was that he had no one to help him. We may say God was needing a man, and man was needing a man, to solve this question. Here in the streets of Jerusalem that one righteous Man had appeared, the Man who was going to solve the whole question. He was here on behalf of God, and He was here on behalf of powerless men.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Search — Jeremiah went through Jerusalem from the poorest to the greatest. At every level the verdict was the same: not one man doing justice, not one seeking truth.

- Offer — the terms were generous. One righteous man would have won pardon for a whole guilty city.

- Cause — false prophets and priests had killed the righteous or driven them out. A city can create the emptiness that condemns it.

- Answer — Christ answers the question left hanging over Jerusalem. He is the one Man in whom God's search ended.

- Result — no man was found then, and judgment followed. The Man has been found now, and through Him we are told to intercede for others.

Jeremiah 5:2 · Darby

And if they say, [As] Jehovah liveth! surely they swear falsely.

In verse 1 God sends Jeremiah through Jerusalem to find one honest man, promising to pardon the whole city for his sake. Verse 2 gives the answer: the city still spoke God's name, and every word of it was a lie.

The search that found no one

Jeremiah did the searching himself. One writer traces how he went about it.

He went first to the poor, simple people. They were sinning because they did not know better. Then he went to the great men, who were sinning and did know better. So he searched that city from the least to the highest, and he could not find one righteous man. But God's word stands: if one righteous man could be found in Jerusalem, God would pardon the whole city because of him. God was seeking a man, one man, to solve the problem in that city — the problem that sin had brought in. That sin marked the people of God and had left them unfruitful in their service for Him.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

What the search turned up instead

So what filled the city instead? One writer sums up the scene and the judgment God pronounces on it.

Yet the judgment was completely just. No one could find righteousness in the streets or the open squares. Profanity was everywhere. And what would the result be under the righteous government of God? "Therefore a lion from the forest shall strike them down; a wolf from the desert shall devastate them... because their transgressions are many, their apostasies are great."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

(The verse quoted is Jeremiah 5:6, ESV.)

Why a false oath is an offence against God Himself

Verse 2 names the sin: swearing falsely by God's name. Another passage pairs that sin with stealing. One writer weighs what each one shows.

Stealing is the evidence of complete disregard for a neighbour's rights in his goods. Swearing is the sign of an equal disregard for the majesty and truth of God. In short, both man and God were thoroughly despised and rebelled against.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same words, said truly

These are the right words. One chapter earlier God had set the same oath before the nation as the mark of a real return.

Again and again Jeremiah tried to rouse the people of God with the cry, "THE LORD LIVES!" "THE LORD LIVES!!" God had told Israel that if they returned to Him, they would swear "As the LORD lives" in truth, in judgment, and in righteousness. Then the nations would bless themselves in Him and glory in Him (Jer. 4:1-2). This is the way of true revival, and of overflow to others.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Jerusalem kept the words and lost the three things that made them real: truth, judgment, righteousness.

Saying what is true without being true

The same danger did not end with ancient Jerusalem. One writer draws the point from a girl who kept repeating the way of salvation while she herself stayed unsaved.

What she said was true enough, but she was not true in saying it. This was the serious point in her case. It is one thing to say, or agree with, what is true, and another thing to be true in saying it. What use was it for her to repeat, day after day, the words about the way of salvation, while she herself stayed unsaved and unblessed? None at all. And we know of nothing more terrible — not in the deepest depths of moral evil, not in the darkest forms of heathenism — than the state of careless, hardened, self-satisfied professing Christians. Every Sunday they say words, in their prayers or their singing, that are wholly false as far as they themselves are concerned.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Searched — God searched Jerusalem from the poorest to the greatest for one righteous man. He would have pardoned the whole city for that man's sake. He found no one.

- Spoken — The city was not silent about God. His name was on its lips every day. That only made the emptiness worse. No one could find righteousness in the streets, and profanity was everywhere.

- Sworn falsely — Using God's name while lying is not careless speech. It is contempt for His majesty and truth. Verse 6 announces the judgment that answers it.

- Said truly — The same oath, sworn in truth, in judgment and in righteousness, was God's own mark of a real return. The blessing would have reached the nations.

- Being true — The test is not whether your words are correct. It is whether you are true in saying them. Words that mean nothing to the speaker are false before God.

Jeremiah 5:3 · Darby

Jehovah, are not thine eyes upon fidelity? Thou hast smitten them, but they are not sore; thou hast consumed them, they have refused to receive correction they have made their faces harder than a rock; they have refused to return.

Jeremiah had searched Jerusalem for one honest person and found none. Now he asks what God's eyes look for, and answers it himself: earlier blows had changed nothing.

What God's eyes are looking for

The question is not doubt about God. It is a verdict on the city. One writer follows the search through every rank of society, and recalls what God had promised if even one honest person turned up:

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord (Jer. 5:3-4). "I will go to the great men," said the prophet, but they were just as evil. The eyes of the Lord are upon the truth, yet not one man could be found in accord with it. … It was God Himself who said at that time to His servant, "If you can find a man, if there is anyone who does justice and seeks the truth, I will pardon" (Jer. 5:1).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The truth God looks for is inward. A person can look religious and still lack it. Another writer presses the point from an older translation's phrase, "truth in the inward parts":

"You desire truth in the inward parts" — truth, not the appearance of it, not the profession of it, but the thing itself, the reality of it. If you are not converted, let me tell you: you do not know what that means. You may make a fair outward show, you may make a profession; but until you deal directly with God, you do not know what "truth in the inward parts" is.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Struck, but not grieved

God's blows had already landed. What alarmed the prophets was that nobody felt them. A commentator, quoting an older translation, names the price of that indifference:

Isaiah says, "Why should you be struck any more? You will revolt more and more." And Jeremiah had to say of the generation in his day, "You have struck them, but they have not grieved." He said again, "I listened and heard, but they did not speak what was right: no man repented of his wickedness, saying, What have I done?" Are we then to wonder that the sword of the Chaldean entered the land?

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The hardening power of sin

God's hand had already consumed them, and still they refused correction. Another commentator, describing a judgment of darkness where people only cursed God, shows why pain alone never changes a heart:

The darkness does not produce repentance either: "They gnawed their tongues for pain, and blasphemed the God of heaven, because of their pains and sores, and did not repent of their deeds." Such is the hardening character of sin. And judgment by itself has no power to break the heart and bring the soul into submission to God.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Correction and its profit

Discipline aims at a result. Whether it reaches that result depends on how you take it:

Afterward chastening yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it. God works the profit in those who have submitted to the trial. We lose it so far as we slight the trial or doubt His love in sending it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Time to turn

Refusing to return is what makes a hardened face so serious. Yet God changes His course when people change theirs:

The message was clear: there was still time for Judah to repent. If so, God would "repent." Otherwise, He would need to chasten and discipline them. God "is not a man … that he should repent" (Num. 23:19) but He does repent when man changes, especially when man repents. Things had gone wrong with Israel. Idolatry had become widespread. The vessel had been marred. But the clay was still soft. There was still time to turn to God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Judgment kept within limits

God would not excuse what Jerusalem had done:

How should the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He approve the worst corruption? Still, He would keep the judgment measured, even though they treated the Lord and His discipline as a lie.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Looks — God's eyes search for truth. He promised pardon if even one true person turned up, and the truth He looks for is inward, not an outward show.

- Strikes — God had already struck this people. The alarming thing was not the blow but that no one grieved under it, and the Chaldean sword followed.

- Hardens — Pain by itself cannot break a heart. Sin hardens, and judgment alone has no power to bring a soul to God.

- Softens — Chastening yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those trained by it. Slight the trial, or doubt the love behind it, and you lose the profit.

- Spares — While the clay is still soft there is time to turn. Even with a people who treated His discipline as a lie, God kept His judgment measured.

Jeremiah 5:4 · Darby

And I said, Surely these are the wretched ones, they are foolish; for they know not the way of Jehovah, the judgment of their God.

God sends Jeremiah through Jerusalem to look for one man who does justice, and promises to pardon the whole city for his sake. This verse gives the prophet's first stop — the poor — and his verdict on them.

The Search That Starts at the Bottom

One commentator follows the search from the bottom of the city to the top.

God made a very remarkable statement to the prophet: "Run to and fro through the streets of Jerusalem, look and take note! Search her squares to see if you can find a man, one who does justice and seeks truth, that I may pardon her." Jeremiah began with the poor of the city, with people who knew very little, and he had to say of them, "These are only the poor; they have no sense; for they do not know the way of the LORD, the justice of their God." He went to the simple folk first. Then he says, "I will go to the great and will speak to them, for they know the way of the LORD... But they all alike had broken the yoke; they had burst the bonds." He went first to the poor, simple folk, who sinned because they did not know better. Then he went to the great ones, who sinned and did know better. So from the least to the highest he searched that city and not one righteous man could be found.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Every Class Alike

The same verdict came back at every rank in the nation.

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord (Jer. 5:3-4). "I will go to the great men", said the prophet, but they were just as evil. The eyes of the Lord are on the truth, yet not one man matched it. The nation was in a pitiful state. It was the same cry then that we sometimes hear now — "Wanted a man"!

after_note: DELETE not used

H. J. Vine

Yet judgment was not the whole story.

Jeremiah 5 shows the sin and iniquity to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Still, He will not destroy them completely.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Not Knowing the Lord

The people were not short of religion. What they lacked was the thing this verse names: any real knowledge of God's way.

Unless we have been reached in the heart and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. That is so even if, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion. What does it matter that they claim to be a religious nation, if the Lord is not exalted! What does it matter that religious people claim to be the church, if the true Head is displaced! Israel made high claims, but they did not know the Lord! They were "stupid children", they had "no understanding", they were "wise" in doing evil, but how to do good they did not know (Jer. 4:22).

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The Verdict on the City

The chapter then announces what God will do with the city.

The judgment was completely just. Righteousness was looked for in vain through the streets and open places; ungodliness was everywhere. And what would the result be under the righteous government of God? "Therefore a lion from the forest shall strike them down; a wolf from the desert shall devastate them. A leopard is watching against their cities; everyone who goes out of them shall be torn in pieces, because their transgressions are many, their apostasies are great."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Man Who Was Found

God's offer stood: one righteous man, and the city would be pardoned. One commentator finds that Man at a pool in Jerusalem, beside a man who had no one at all.

The helpless man lying at the pool of Bethesda for thirty-eight years... represents Israel under the law, and their inability to produce fruit for God. This poor man, unable to make a single movement, cries out in distress, "Sir, I have no one to put me into the pool" (older versions read, "I have no man"). We may say God needed a man, and man needed a man, to settle this question. Here in the streets of Jerusalem that one righteous Man had appeared, the Man who was going to solve the whole question. He was here on behalf of God, and He was here on behalf of helpless men.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Summary

- Searched — God sent Jeremiah through Jerusalem to find one just man. For his sake He would pardon the whole city.

- Poor first — Jeremiah began with the simple people, who sinned without knowing better. Then he went to the great, who knew the Lord's way and broke the yoke anyway.

- All alike — from the king to the man in the street, all were guilty. Ignorance below and knowledge above ended in the same failure.

- Judged — no righteousness was left in the streets, so the lion, the wolf and the leopard of God's government were the just answer.

- Found — the one righteous Man God looked for stood at last in those same streets. He met God's claim and man's helplessness together.

Jeremiah 5:5 · Darby

I will go unto the great men, and will speak unto them; for they know the way of Jehovah, the judgment of their God; but these have altogether broken the yoke, have burst the bonds.

God sends Jeremiah through Jerusalem with an offer of mercy: find one righteous man, and He will pardon the whole city. The poor have already failed the test, so the prophet turns to the leading men, who ought to have known better.

From the poor to the great

This verse is the second half of a two-stage search:

Jeremiah began with the poor of the city, with people who knew very little. Of them he had to say, "These are only the poor; they have no sense; for they do not know the way of the LORD, the justice of their God" (verse 4). He went to the poor, simple folk that were sinning because they did not know better; then he went to the great ones that were sinning and who did know better. So from the least to the highest he searched that city and not one righteous man could be found.

Modernised from George DavisonOriginal wording

Rank without righteousness

The search ran from the top of society to the bottom:

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the LORD (Jer. 5:3-4). "I will go to the great," said the prophet, but they were just as evil. The eyes of the LORD are on truth, yet not one man could be found in agreement with it. The nation was in a pitiable state. It was the same cry then which we sometimes hear now — "Wanted: a man"!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Greater light, greater guilt

The clause "they know the way of the LORD" is not a compliment here; it is the reason their sin weighs more:

God in His goodness gives people a measure of light. They are to be faithful to that light. The measure of that light is the measure of their responsibility on the day they must give account to God. For, "that servant who knew his master's will but did not get ready or act according to his will, will receive a severe beating. But the one who did not know, and did what deserved a beating, will receive a light beating. Everyone to whom much was given, of him much will be required" (Luke 12:47-48).

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

The same principle turns straight on anyone who has heard much truth today:

No one brings such shame on the truth, and no one so loses all conscience, as those who are familiar with truth without obedience. The people who dishonour the Lord most are those who know the truth, but are not subject to it.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The broken yoke

The verse ends with a broken yoke and snapped cords. One writer names that condition and sees it coming back:

It was a general apostasy. A similar apostasy is predicted for the end of our age. "When the Son of Man comes, will He find faith on earth?" They were foolish, says the Lord; they broke the yoke and burst the bonds; they have refused to return.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Every class exposed

No group in the city could point at another. One writer places this beside the ministry of Christ, where the light exposed everyone alike:

The rich and the poor, the rulers and the crowds, were all alike exposed by it. So Jeremiah, in his day, visited "the poor," and found that they did not know the way of the Lord. He then visited "the great ones," and found that they had completely broken the bonds. Jer. 5:1-5. And so it was here with Jeremiah's Lord.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Man the search could not find

The search ended with no man found. God's answer came later:

Thanks be to God, we have no need now to cry out "A man wanted"! The king of Israel might fail as the head of the nation, or, even if faithful, he still died. The man Christ Jesus, however, who is the Head of the assembly today, never fails and never dies... God has provided a perfect Man, a Man who has settled the sin question, who has overthrown Satan, and redeemed us to God by His blood.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Search. God offered to pardon a whole city for the sake of one righteous man, and sent the prophet to look for him.

- Poor. The first stage failed on ignorance: the humble folk sinned without knowing the way of the Lord.

- Great. The second stage failed on rebellion: these knew the way, and still snapped the yoke and the cords.

- Verdict. Knowledge measures responsibility. Those who knew sinned worse than those who did not, and no class could plead innocence.

- Man. The search ended empty in Jerusalem. It ends in Christ, the one Man who never fails and who settled the sin question.

Jeremiah 5:6 · Darby

Therefore a lion out of the forest shall slay them, a wolf of the evenings shall waste them; the leopard lurketh against their cities, every one that goeth out thence is torn in pieces for their transgressions are multiplied, their backslidings are increased.

God sent Jeremiah up and down the streets of Jerusalem to look for one honest man, and there was none. This verse is the verdict after that search: three hunting animals, and the reason for them at the end.

The search that came up empty

The chapter tests every level of society before this verse falls. One writer shows how thorough that test was.

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord. "I will go to the great men," said the prophet, but they were just as evil. The eyes of the Lord are upon the truth, yet not one man could be found in accord with it. It was God Himself who said to His servant, "If you can find a man, one who does justice and seeks truth, that I may pardon her." God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But their politics were corrupt, their social life was debased, and their religion had given itself over to idols.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why the verse begins with "Therefore"

That first word ties the beasts to everything before them. One writer reads what follows not as random disaster but as God's government.

Yet the judgment was completely just. No one could find righteousness in the streets or the open squares. There was no reverence for God anywhere. And what would the result be under the righteous government of the Lord?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Lion, wolf and leopard: an army, not a zoo

The verse leaves no exit: the leopard watches the cities, and whoever goes out is torn in pieces. Two of these animals appear again in another prophet's picture of the Chaldean army — the Babylonians. One writer links Jeremiah's words to that army's speed and hunger.

"Their horses are swifter than leopards, and are more agile than the evening wolves; and their horsemen prance proudly... they fly as an eagle that hurries to devour." More than once Jeremiah uses the same expressions (Jer. 4:13; 5:6). The swiftness and agility of the Chaldeans were like those of a pack of hungry wolves rushing on silently. With gleaming eyes glowing in the dark, they were sure to reach their prey.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Older translations read "a wolf of the evenings" here. One reference work explains why this animal makes such a fitting picture of evil.

This well-known animal is described in Scripture as ravenous, hunting its prey in the evening. They are very destructive among the sheep, attacking and killing more than they can eat. This makes the wolf a fitting picture of the wicked, who trouble the sheep and lambs of God's flock, and even creep in among them.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Struck, but they felt nothing

The reason at the end of the verse is not just that sins were many. God had already tried correction, and it had failed.

Isaiah says, "Why should you be struck any more? You will rebel more and more." Jeremiah had to say of the generation in his day, "You have struck them down, but they felt no anguish." And again: "I have listened and heard, but they did not speak rightly; no man relents of his evil, saying, What have I done?" Are we then to wonder that the sword of the Chaldean entered the land?

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Where unchecked drifting ends

One writer reads this verse as the end of a road that starts with an ignored call.

If that blessed response to the call does not take place, do you know what will follow? Things will get worse. If we do not listen to the call to come back, we reach the sixth verse of Jeremiah 5. I think God gives us a vivid picture in this book of what is bound to follow if backsliding is not checked. "Their transgressions are many, their apostasies are great" (Jer. 5:6). How solemn!

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The call that was still open

Earlier in the same book, God had already called these people back and promised to heal them.

"Return, you faithless children, and I will heal your faithlessness." Who could resist such an appeal? Many a poor soul says: How can I get back? What must I go through to get back? Look at that verse again, and notice the result of the call: "Behold, we come to you; for you are the Lord our God" (Jer. 3:22). It is done.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

(Where the ESV reads "faithless" in Jeremiah 3:22 and "apostasies" in Jeremiah 5:6, older translations read "backsliding" and "backslidings" — the same idea of turning away from God.)

Summary

- Searched — God looked through every rank of Jerusalem for one honest man and found none. The beasts come after that search fails.

- Just — the lion, wolf and leopard are not accidents. They are God's righteous government over a people who had left Him.

- Real — the imagery describes the Chaldean army: swift, silent, hungry, certain to reach its prey.

- Refused — the cause is not one sin but correction ignored. God had struck them, and they felt no anguish.

- Return — the road to the lion began with a call nobody heeded. That call still stood: come back, and He heals your faithlessness.

Jeremiah 5:7 · Darby

Wherefore should I pardon thee? Thy children have forsaken me, and swear by them that are not God. I have satiated them, and they have committed adultery, and they troop to the harlots' house.

In Jeremiah 5 God asks a question instead of passing sentence: on what ground could He forgive a people like this? The charge that follows names three faults. His children have left Him. They swear by gods who do not exist. He fed them well, and they answered with adultery.

The search that came first

The chapter opens with God sending His prophet through the streets to look for one honest man. Find him, and God would pardon the whole city. The search failed at every level of national life.

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord. "I will go to the great men", said the prophet, but they were just as evil... It was God Himself who said that if they could find one man who did justice and sought the truth, He would pardon. God claimed recognition and honour in every circle, but their rulers were corrupt, their society was debased, and their religion was given over to idolatry, while prophets, priests and people joined together in lies.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Forsaking is the root

"Your children have forsaken me" is not one item in a list. The same writer shows the charge repeated through these chapters, and shows where it ends.

In these chapters (4 to 6), the Lord again declares the cause of all their distress. He says, "They have forsaken Me, they have not known Me, they do not fear Me" (Jer. 4:22; 5:7, 19, 22)... The desolation of such a nation, which had turned its back to the Lord, was inevitable. Corrupt princes and a corrupt people called for this.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Oaths sworn by nothing

Judah swore by gods who do not exist. They had no shortage of them, and no help from them either.

In their trouble they might turn to God with "Arise and save us"; but God challenges their gods to arise if they can save them. Sadly it was not for lack of numbers, for Judah had as many gods as cities.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fed to the full — and then

The verse ties the sin to the fullness: God fed them, and adultery followed. One writer sees a pattern here that repeats, not a strange accident.

But then as now, and now as then, the very fullness of the blessing they enjoyed could make them forget the gracious hand that gave it. "Fullness of bread" had of old been the destruction of Sodom. Trouble and need wake a man up to his need of God. When he lacks nothing, he easily loses the sense that he still depends on Him... In this state the gods that man's own heart has invented attract him more than the glorious God, who is our Creator and not our creature.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The warning was given long before Jeremiah, and one commentator applies it straight to the reader:

In the latter part of this chapter they are warned of the dangers that lie hidden in prosperity. Then would come the temptation to rest in the luxury, forget God's goodness to them, and be seduced to seek after false gods. So it came to pass in their history, as we know. Again we as Christians have to remind ourselves that for us also, days of outward and earthly prosperity are times of spiritual danger and defeat.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Adultery in two senses

The verse moves from false gods to the houses of whores without a break. One charge covers both: unfaithfulness.

"High places" for idol worship had dotted the whole land, and in the shade of every green tree the people practised the abominations of the pagan nations. These unholy and unclean rites deserved the name of harlotry that the prophets so often give them, and they deserved it both spiritually and literally. What could God do with such a nation but put them away?

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Why the question has no easy answer

The word for pardon here is salach. It means "to pass over," to forgive. The Old Testament uses it only of God's forgiving.

Morrish Bible Dictionary

Only God can grant it, and He will not grant it at the cost of His own character. That is the weight of His question.

How should the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He sanction the grossest depravity? Still, the judgment would be measured, even though they denied the Lord and the correction He sent.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God answers His own question in the end, not by lowering the standard but by meeting it.

A sinner needs mercy and forgiveness because of his sins. But if the pardon he receives on believing in the Lord Jesus Christ is to be secure and lasting, it must rest on righteousness. This is only another way of saying that God can never act out of keeping with His own nature, in any age.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- Searched — God looked through Jerusalem for one righteous man, and promised to pardon the whole city for his sake. King, great men, prophets and priests all failed the test.

- Forsaken — "They have forsaken Me, they have not known Me, they do not fear Me." That is the cause of the nation's ruin, not just one charge among many.

- Fed — the fullness God gave became the reason they forgot Him. Need makes us feel our dependence. Plenty makes us lose it, then as now.

- Faithless — idol worship and immoral rites filled the land, and the prophets call both by one name: harlotry, spiritual and literal.

- Forgiven — God will not pardon in a way that rewards His own dishonour. Lasting pardon rests on righteousness, so that forgiving agrees with what God is.

Jeremiah 5:8 · Darby

[As] well fed horses, they roam about, every one neigheth after his neighbour's wife.

Jeremiah 5 is God's search of Jerusalem for one honest man. Verse 8 is part of His answer: a city so well fed that its people turned their strength into appetite, and God's own kindness ended up feeding their sin.

The picture behind the words

The verse compares men to animals. One writer uses the same picture of men who grew fat on the offerings of God's people:

They lived in luxury among a people of simple habits. They kept servants, and "made themselves fat with the best of all the offerings of God's people." They became "as fed horses." The crime of unbridled lust laid at their door is just the natural result of such sensual living.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Fed by God, and worse for it

Verse 8 follows God's complaint that He had fed them to the full. Comfort itself can loosen a person's grip on God:

But then as now, the very fullness of the blessing enjoyed might make people forget the gracious hand that gave it. "Fullness of bread" had long before been the destruction of Sodom. Trial and need wake a man up to his need of God. Without want, he can easily lose the sense that he still depends on Him.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

So pardon was not a simple matter. One writer puts God's problem as three questions:

How should the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He sanction the grossest depravity? Still, the judgment would be kept within measure, even though they denied the Lord and His discipline.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Adultery under the law

Adultery was named in the ten commandments, and the penalty was severe. A survey of the subject sets Jeremiah's charge among the darkest examples in Israel's history:

The ten commandments forbade this, but neither there nor anywhere else is the sin defined… If a man committed adultery with a married woman, or with one who was engaged, both were to be put to death (Deuteronomy 22:22-24)… Jeremiah charges Israel with being like fed horses, each man neighing after his neighbour's wife. Such a charge cried out for judgement.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

More than a bodily sin

The same writer takes the charge two steps further — into the heart, and into Israel's bond with God:

The Lord declared that a man commits adultery in his heart if he lusts after a woman… Adultery also had a symbolic meaning. Israel had been engaged to Jehovah, but instead of being a faithful wife she had looked for other lovers. She committed adultery with her idols (Ezekiel 23:37).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

No corner of the nation was clean

One writer sums up how far the rot went, and how far God's answer would not go:

In Jeremiah 5 the sin and iniquity are shown to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And, "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Still, He will not destroy entirely.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer traces the collapse through every part of national life:

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"!… God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But in politics they were corrupt, in society they were debased (Jeremiah 5:7-9), and in religion they were given over to idolatry.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The same conditions, read forward

One writer reads Jerusalem's state as a pattern, not just past history:

The people of Jerusalem had sunk so low that the Lord made this promise. If one man could be found in the city who did justice and sought the truth, He would pardon Jerusalem. It was a general apostasy. A similar apostasy is predicted for the end of our age. "Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will He find faith on earth?"

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Privilege raises the stakes; it does not lower them:

The heaviest woes still in store for this world are not for the darkness of nations who never knew God. They are for a corrupt Christian world, just as they were for a rebellious Judaism: places where most truth is known and the highest privileges are given, but where their power is despised and denied.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Fed — God fed them to the full. But the fullness of a blessing can make people forget the hand that gave it, just as "fullness of bread" destroyed Sodom.

- Fattened — men who live in luxury become "as fed horses." Unbridled lust is the natural result, and the Lord counts lust in the heart as adultery already.

- Spread — the sin ran through rich and poor alike: corrupt in politics, debased in society, idolatrous in religion. Not one man could be found to meet the case.

- Visited — a charge like this cried out for judgement. God would not reward His own dishonour or approve such depravity. Yet the judgment was measured, and He would not destroy entirely.

- Warned — the same widespread falling away is expected at the end of the age. The heaviest woes fall where most truth is known.

Jeremiah 5:9 · Darby

Shall I not visit for these things? saith Jehovah, and shall not my soul be avenged on such a nation as this?

God does not announce the sentence here. He asks a question. He puts it to a people He had just called well-fed adulterers. The question has two halves: punishment "for these things," and vengeance on "a nation such as this."

The charge that produces the question

The question does not stand alone. It closes a list of specific wrongs, and one writer sets it directly against the mercy the people had already received.

Jeremiah 5 continues this subject of judgment. The prophet still shows the terrible moral condition of Jerusalem. He warns them of the penalties about to come: "How shall I pardon you for this? Your children have forsaken Me, and sworn by those who are no gods. When I had fed them to the full, they committed adultery, and crowded into the houses of prostitutes. They were like well-fed horses in the morning, each one neighing after his neighbour's wife. Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD" (verses 7-9).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why pardon could not simply be given

If God had let this pass, something about God Himself would have been said by it. The same writer presses the point as two further questions.

How could the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He approve the vilest corruption? Still, the judgment was to be measured, even though they denied the Lord and His discipline. (Verses 7-18.)

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"A nation such as this"

The phrase covers the whole people, not just a criminal few. Earlier in the chapter, God offered to pardon the city for the sake of one honest man. The search failed at every level of society.

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord (Jer. 5:3-4). "I will go to the great men," said the prophet, but they were just as evil. It was God Himself who said, "If you can find a man, one who does justice and seeks truth, that I may pardon her" (Jer. 5:1). God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But their politics were corrupt, their social life was debased (Jer. 5:7-9), and their religion had given itself over to idols.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Asked once, then asked again

The identical words return at the end of the chapter, in verse 29. One writer weighs the two askings together, and names those who shared in the lies.

"Shall I not punish them for these things? [listing their sins] declares the LORD; and shall I not avenge myself on a nation such as this?" is the twofold witness of the prophet. (Verses 9 and 29.) People, prophets and priests all loved falsehood together.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Total guilt, but not total destruction

The question sweeps in every class, yet judgment stops short of wiping the nation out. One writer sets the two side by side, and points to who kept the evil alive.

Jeremiah 5 shows the sin and iniquity to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Still, He will not destroy the nation completely. The chapter points out the source of the evil, or at least what keeps it going. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule with their help.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A pattern that returns

One writer reads Jerusalem's condition as a picture of something the world will see again.

The people of Jerusalem had become so corrupt that the Lord made a promise: if one man could be found in the city who did justice and sought the truth, He would pardon Jerusalem. It was a general falling away from God. A similar falling away is expected at the end of our age. "Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will He find faith on earth?"

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Judgment came late here, and it did not come coldly.

Long-suffering — even God's — has its limits. A greater and more tender servant of God than Jeremiah wept over that people. He wept before He passed the terrible sentence — a sentence passed in sorrow, and passed only after long delay.

Modernised from J. Wilson SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. God punishes "for these things" — the sins named just before, committed by people He had fed to the full.

- Character. Pardon without judgment would mean God rewarding His own dishonour and approving the worst corruption.

- Reach. The guilt covered everyone — king, great men, ordinary people, prophets and priests. God found no honest man to spare the city for.

- Repetition. The same question returns in verse 29 — a twofold witness that God's mind had not changed.

- Restraint. The judgment was measured, not final. God would punish, yet not destroy the nation completely. The sentence came late, and it came in sorrow.

Jeremiah 5:10 · Darby

Go up upon her walls, and destroy; but make not a full end; take away her battlements, for they are not Jehovah's.

Jeremiah has just searched Jerusalem for one honest man and found none. Now the sentence falls. The same command that sends the destroyers also fixes a line they may not cross.

The search that found no one

The order to strip and destroy rests on a verdict already reached. God had offered to pardon the whole city for the sake of one just man.

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they knew not the way of the Lord. "I will get me to the great men," said the prophet, but they were all alike evil. The eyes of the Lord are upon the truth, yet not one man could be found in agreement with it. The nation was in a pitiable state. It was God Himself who said at that time to His servant, "If you can find a man, if there is anyone who does justice and seeks truth, I will pardon." God claimed recognition and honour in every circle, but politically they were corrupt, socially they were debased, and religiously they were given over to idolatry, while prophets, priests and people joined together in falsehood.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why God must act

The sentence is not aimed at one class while sparing another. Yet even with guilt that wide, God stops short of total ruin.

In Jeremiah 5 the sin and iniquity are everywhere: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not visit for these things? says Jehovah." Still, He will not destroy entirely.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Who goes up to destroy

The verse does not name who goes up. Behind the invasion stands the God who raised the invader up.

There was no man to save the sorrowful situation! Therefore God raises up the instrument of His anger! The event the book points to is going to happen! Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sound is heard! Evil comes and a great destruction!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The limit written into the order

"Make not a full end" restrains the invaders in the same breath that sends them. God fixes how far they may go.

How should the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He sanction the grossest depravity? Still, the judgment was to be measured, even though they contradicted the Lord and His corrections.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why a full end is never made

The destruction stops short, and not because the guilt was small. God keeps a people for Himself in the middle of the wreckage.

A real turning to God marks that remnant out.

But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. These turn in reality to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him (Jer. 4:27 and 5:18); therefore He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Branches or battlements

What is removed here depends on the translation. The ESV reads "strip away her branches." Older translations read "take away her battlements." A Bible dictionary explains the Hebrew word behind it:

netishoth: this signifies "expansion," and may well refer to extended battlements. A parapet on the walls, with holes through which arrows could be shot, may be seen on some of the Assyrian monuments. Jer. 5:10.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Either way, God takes away what the city leaned on for defence. The reason He gives is short: it is not His.

From threat to promise

The same wording returns later in the book, now inside a promise. It has a name there: discipline.

Jeremiah also speaks of God "correcting," "chastising" or "instructing" His people — that is, disciplining them. The same Hebrew word for this occurs seven times in the book. Chapter 30:11 states: "For I am with you, says Jehovah, to save you. For I will make a full end of all the nations where I have scattered you. Yet of you I will not make a full end, but I will correct you with judgment, and will not hold you altogether guiltless."

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. God offered to pardon the city for one just man, and the search failed from the king down to the ordinary citizen.

- Command. God raises up the destroyer from the north as the instrument of His anger. This invasion is no accident of politics.

- Limit. "Make not a full end" measures the judgment. God will not sanction the evil, and He will not destroy entirely.

- Remnant. The destruction stops short because God keeps a remnant among His people — those true to Him in heart.

- Result. The same words come back later as a promise: a full end for the nations, correction for His own.

Jeremiah 5:11 · Darby

For the house of Israel and the house of Judah have dealt very treacherously against me, saith Jehovah.

In one sentence God sums up His case against His people. Both kingdoms — Israel in the north, Judah in the south — have broken faith with Him. The charge is betrayal, not just disobedience. So what relationship did they break, who was guilty, and what does God do with a people who proved unfaithful?

The Language of a Broken Marriage

God speaks here the way a husband speaks of a wife who has walked out. One writer follows that thread through Jeremiah and on into the New Testament.

Often we find the Lord reminding His people, Israel, of the sad fact that all their trouble came from turning away from Him. "Surely, as a treacherous wife leaves her husband, so have you been treacherous to me, O house of Israel, declares the LORD" (Jer. 3:20). He was their ALL, but they looked for comfort elsewhere. "They have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters," He said. It was so with God's people of old. Later John had to record about the assembly at Ephesus — where Paul worked so long and so faithfully — "you have abandoned the love you had at first" (Rev. 2:4).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Two Houses, Two Kinds of Failure

God names the two kingdoms together, though their stories differ. One turned to other gods. The other kept the temple and the forms while the heart had already gone.

Israel as a nation rebelled against God. Judah as a nation stayed loyal in profession. They held to the house of David, and outwardly to the temple and worship of the Lord. Yet in heart they were as rebellious as the Israelites. God said of them, "This people draws near with their lips, but their heart is far from Me." The hypocrisy of Judah was more hateful to God than the open apostasy of Israel. God had His remnant in both kingdoms.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

No Class of People Left Out

The guilt reached every level of society. One writer sums up the chapter's verdict and names what kept the evil going.

Jeremiah 5 shows the sin and iniquity to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Still, He will not destroy them entirely. The source of the evil, or at least what keeps it going, is pointed out. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule by their means.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

No Pardon — but Measured Judgment

Why not simply forgive and move on? One writer answers with three questions, then marks the limit God kept on the punishment.

How should the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He sanction the grossest depravity? Still, the judgment was to be measured, even though they treated the Lord and His chastenings as lies.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Punishment Mirrors the Sin

What they had done to God shaped what God let happen to them. The same writer shows how the sentence answered the crime.

It would not be only desolation and death in the land. The people would serve strangers in a foreign land, just as they had forsaken the Lord and served strange gods in their own land. They had already revolted and gone away in heart. People, prophets, priests all loved falsehood together.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Two Houses Named Again — in Promise

Later in the same book God promises a new covenant to these same two houses. One writer sets the old and the new side by side.

Behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah… my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the LORD… I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more (Jer. 31). The old covenant was made with Israel, and the new covenant will be made with the same people. There were two sides to the old covenant — God's and the people's. The people broke their side, and this forced God to break His, or rather to find fault with it, as a basis of relationship with Himself that could do nothing for the people. There will be only one side to the new. In the old God said, "I will, if you will"; but in the new it is all "I WILL" on God's part. He will put His law, not on two stone tablets, but on the hearts and minds of the people.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Summary

- Betrayal, not just disobedience. The word points to a wife leaving her husband — God had been their all, and they sought comfort elsewhere.

- Both houses. Israel rebelled openly. Judah kept the temple and the profession while the heart was far away. God found that hypocrisy more hateful than open revolt.

- Nobody exempt. Rich and poor alike, with false prophets and priests keeping the evil in place.

- Judgment measured. God would not reward His own dishonour. Yet He would not destroy them entirely. They served strangers abroad as they had served strange gods at home.

- The same names, a new covenant. The two houses that broke the old covenant are the two God promises a new one. The old said, "I will, if you will"; the new is all God's "I WILL" — His law written on hearts, their sin remembered no more.

Jeremiah 5:12 · Darby

They have denied Jehovah, and say, He is not; and evil shall not come upon us, nor shall we see sword nor famine;

Jerusalem had stopped believing that God would act. Jeremiah records the people's own verdict on Him — He will do nothing — and behind it stand prophets who promised them the same escape.

The condition that produced the denial

God looked through Jerusalem for one honest man. The search failed at every level of society.

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord. "I will go to the great men," said the prophet, but they were alike evil. The eyes of the Lord are upon the truth, yet not one man could be found in accord with it. The nation was in a pitiful state. God Himself had said, "if you can find a man, one who does justice and seeks truth, that I may pardon her."… God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But they were corrupt in politics, debased in society, and given over to idolatry in religion. Prophets, priests and people joined together in lying.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

What "It is not He" takes away from God

The short Hebrew phrase behind the people's words is one God uses of Himself elsewhere. To say "He is not" is to strike at the name by which He declares Himself the one unchanging God.

There is another word which, though it may be used as a description, is hard to exclude from the names of God: Hu, Atta Hu, "you are the same," the unchangeable One. "I am He, the same, and besides me no god." I am He, Hu, Atta Hu… Jeremiah 5:12. It has the sense of the unchanging, existing One, and this is true of God only.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Speaking falsely of the Lord

The lie was not only about the future. It touched God's honour, and it dismissed the blows He was already sending.

How should the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He sanction the grossest depravity? Still, God would measure the judgment, even though they lied about the Lord and His chastenings.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Disbelief settles nothing

Their confidence rests on nothing but their own opinion — and opinion has no power over what God has said He will do.

No one can get rid of the judgments God has appointed in His word. Disbelief alters the truth of not one thing. What is, is; and what shall be, shall be. Man does not make anything untrue by his disbelief. My being deceived cannot make a false thing true, even if it ruins me. My convictions make nothing true, and they do not bind God in His judgments. Men deceived by themselves are easily deceived by others who prophesy according to the blindness of the people.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Who taught the people to talk this way

The next verses trace the sentiment back to the prophets. Comfortable predictions are the signature of a false messenger.

It is always a mark of false prophecies that in a day of evil they promised prosperity. When the people of God have departed from Him, false prophets prophesy smooth things. They have their glowing dreams of progress and of the spread of the Lord's work and blessing. A true prophet, on the contrary, in the day of evil warns of the coming of the Lord to judge the ungodly.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God's answer struck the promise-makers first, and then the crowd who believed them:

The false prophets must be the first to fall by the very evil they promised the people would escape. And the people must learn, by their own just ruin, how foolish it was to listen to man's promises.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same words spoken now

What Judah did with God's word decided what it reaped. The same rule holds now.

Their sowing was bringing a harvest. They asked, "Why has the LORD our God done all these things to us?" He answers that they had sown their evil seed by forsaking the Lord and serving strange gods. The harvest would be serving strangers in a strange land… What was true of that generation is true of this present age also. The seed being sown now is Bible rejection. Rejecting the gospel of Christ is the seed of apostasy, and it will bring a harvest of judgment, as it did with Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Search. God offered to pardon the city for one honest man. From the king down to the man in the street, He found none.

- Name. Their "It is not He" denies God's own words, "I am He" — the unchanging One who alone exists.

- Source. The comfortable message came from the prophets. Promising good days in an evil day marks a false messenger.

- Fact. Disbelief changes nothing. No one escapes the judgments God has appointed in His word.

- Harvest. The prophets who promised escape fell first. Rejecting God's word still sows the same crop.

Jeremiah 5:13 · Darby

and the prophets shall become wind, and the word is not in them thus shall it be done unto them.

Jeremiah is warning a city that has stopped taking warnings seriously. Here he quotes the crowd's own sneer back at them: the men who speak for God are just moving air. Two questions run through the chapter. Who really had God's word? And what happens to a people who treat a warning as empty noise?

A message nobody believed

The taunt sits in a passage where Jeremiah announces the coming invasion and the people wave it away.

Verses 10-18. The people had not believed the messages of judgment (verse 12). What the invader from the north will do to Israel is described in verses 15-18. Again the promise is given, "I will not make a full end with you." The Lord keeps a remnant in the midst of His people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Who taught them to talk that way

Where did such confidence come from? One writer looks past the people to the men leading them.

In Jeremiah 5 the sin and iniquity are shown to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Yet He will not destroy completely. The source of the evil, or at least what keeps it going, is pointed out. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule through them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The word really was missing — but not from Jeremiah

The charge "the word is not in them" was true of somebody. Later in the book Jeremiah turns it on the prophets themselves.

Jeremiah next reproached the prophets (23:9, 16). Instead of passing on to their hearers the Word of the Lord, "They speak a vision of their own heart." Instead of standing in the council of God and making His people hear His Word (v. 22), they go out according to their own thoughts. How dangerous this unfaithfulness is! It twists or even falsifies the message of God's Word by bringing in one's own opinions. "I did not send these prophets, yet they ran; I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied" (v. 21).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Nobody was left to say otherwise

The failure went wider than the prophets. Reading the whole chapter, one writer finds every layer of the nation gone the same way — and men like them still at work today.

God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But their politics were corrupt and their social life was debased (Jer. 5:7-9). In religion they had given themselves over to idolatry (v. 19). Prophets, priests and people joined together in falsehood (vv. 30-31). Verses 25 to 29 single out some especially wicked men. They have no thought for the needy, yet they prosper themselves. They are cunning, they craftily lie in wait to catch men. From these verses the Holy Spirit seems to draw, in the letter to the Ephesians, a picture of the sort of men who trap weak Christians today — especially "the babes" in Christ; as we read, "by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes" (Eph. 4:14).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

How to tell wind from wheat

If God's word counts for no more than air, what settles the matter? The answer lies in the quality of the thing itself.

In the latter part of this chapter (Jer. 23) the value of the word of the LORD is again pressed very strongly, and in an interesting way. The false prophets, the profane priests, and all the other dreamers brought forward their words to deceive. But the Lord stands by His own utterances. How? Why should they pay attention to it? On what ground? On its own intrinsic power. "What is the chaff to the wheat?" (verse 28). Nutritional value decides.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Judgment came, but with a limit

Jerusalem's sin raised a question about God Himself, not only about the city. Even so, He kept the judgment within bounds.

How could the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He approve the grossest depravity? Yet the judgment was to be measured, even though they lied about the Lord and His chastenings. (Ver. 7-18.)

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Wind, they said — the people had stopped believing the messages of judgment, and said so out loud (verse 12).

- Wind, they were fed — prophets prophesying falsely, with priests ruling through them, kept the evil alive.

- Wind, in truth — the men who lacked God's word were the ones speaking a vision of their own heart.

- Wheat, not chaff — God's word proves itself by its own power. Nutritional value decides which voice was real.

- Wind, but not the end — judgment fell, yet God measured it: "I will not make a full end with you," and He kept a remnant.

Jeremiah 5:14 · Darby

Therefore thus saith Jehovah, the God of hosts Because ye speak this word, behold, I will make my words in thy mouth fire, and this people wood, and it shall devour them.

The people had just said that the LORD would do nothing and that His prophets were only wind. God's reply turns that mockery into their sentence, and it raises a question: how can a spoken word burn a nation, and how far does the burning go?

The denial that provoked the answer

The chapter has been building a case. God found no honest man in the city, and the people answered His discipline by contradicting Him. One writer covers this whole section and notes that God still set a limit to the judgment.

How should the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He approve the worst corruption? Yet God still measured the judgment, even though they contradicted the Lord and His discipline. (Verses 7-18.)

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What kept the lie in circulation was the religious leadership itself.

Jeremiah 5 shows that the sin and iniquity reach everyone: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Still, He will not destroy them completely. The chapter points out the source of the evil, or at least what keeps it going. The prophets prophesy lies, and the priests rule through them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the prophet's word is fire

God gave Jeremiah a commission when He called him. It explains the strange language here, where the prophet does what only God can do.

This commission means that God chose Jeremiah to announce the troubles and judgment coming on all nations. God was sure to carry out every threat Jeremiah spoke against them. So He speaks of the prophet as if Jeremiah himself were pulling down and planting and building and destroying, according to the prophecies God gave him to speak.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Fire and hammer

The same picture returns later in the book. There God puts His word next to the dreams of men who kept promising peace.

They prophesied lies in the name of Jehovah; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of Jehovah. Teachers who have abandoned the faith still do the same work today. They speak out of the deceit of their hearts. They prophesy lies, and they aim at the Name which is above every name. How different is the word of the Lord from the idle dreams of these false prophets. "Is not my word like fire, declares the LORD, and like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces?"

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Dry wood ready to burn

Fire needs dry wood. This chapter has already shown what kind of wood Judah had become.

From the king down to the man in the street, no one could meet the situation. Scripture tells us, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord... God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. Instead their politics was corrupt, their common life was debased, and their religion was given over to idolatry. Prophets, priests and people all joined in the lie.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Devoured, yet not finished

The fire is not just a picture. The verses that follow name the invader who carries it out, and God sets its limit in the same breath.

The people had not believed the judgment messages (verse 12). Verses 15-18 describe what the invader from the north will do to Israel. Again God gives the promise, "I will not make a full end of you." The Lord keeps a remnant among His people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Denied. The people contradicted God and His discipline. The sin ran through rich and poor alike. Prophets who lied kept it alive, and priests ruled through them.

- Commissioned. God put His words in Jeremiah's mouth. He would carry out every threat the prophet spoke, so He speaks of Jeremiah as doing the pulling down himself.

- Fire. God's word answers the invented dreams of the false prophets: it is fire, and a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces.

- Fuel. The city held no honest man. It was corrupt in politics, debased in society, and given over to idolatry. That is dry wood waiting for such a word.

- Remnant. The judgment was real but measured. The invader from the north came, yet God would not make a full end. He kept a remnant among His people.

Jeremiah 5:15 · Darby

Behold, I bring a nation upon you from afar, house of Israel, saith Jehovah it is a mighty nation, it is an ancient nation, a nation whose language thou knowest not, neither understandest thou what they say.

Jeremiah 5 has just searched Jerusalem's streets for one righteous person and found none. Now God names the sentence: an army marching in from far away. Who is this nation? Why would God use it against His own people? And why does He point out that Judah cannot even understand their speech?

Why the sentence falls

One writer follows that failed search through every layer of the nation.

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord (Jer. 5:3-4)… God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But in government they were corrupt, in society they had sunk low (Jer. 5:7-9), and in religion they had given themselves up to idolatry.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The nation from far away

One writer names the new power, traces its ancient line, and explains what God meant it to do.

A new power would arise, the Chaldeans. They would invade and take over homes that were not theirs. That is, they would set out on a wide conquest and take away Judah's home. They were to be the instrument in God's hand to deal out judgment to the Jews and humble them, along with other nations. The Chaldeans, called Hakhadsim in Hebrew, were of Semitic origin, coming from Kesed, the son of Nahor and brother of Abraham (Gen. 22:22).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Can God use an evil nation as His tool? One writer answers plainly.

Later God used the Chaldeans in this way, and this is what troubled the prophet Habakkuk. He protested that, bad as Israel might be, the Chaldeans God was going to use to discipline them were worse. We see here what we also see in Habakkuk: God may use an evil nation to discipline His unfaithful people, but only under His strict supervision and control.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The punishment matches the crime

One writer shows how the punishment fits the sin.

It would not only be ruin and death in the land. The people would also serve strangers in a foreign land, just as they had forsaken the Lord and served foreign gods in their own land. Their hearts had already turned away and left Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A language you cannot understand

Why does God mention the language at all? One commentator finds the purpose behind it.

Verse 21 quotes Isaiah 28:11-12. It points to Israel being humbled as foreign nations ruled over them, because of their proud rebellion against God. God would use foreign languages to humble them, not to lift them up. By this means He sought to wake them from their unbelief, yet they would not hear.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

An old warning coming due

The wording is not new. One writer lines up Jeremiah's words with Moses' earlier warnings.

Jeremiah's quotations and citations from the Book of the Covenant are too many to mention… Compare Jer. 2:6 and Deut. 32:10; Jer. 5:15 and Deut. 28:49.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

One commentator spells out what Moses' warning meant and when it came true.

The Lord would send a foreign nation against them that would show no respect for old age and no compassion toward children (vs. 49-50). This likely refers to the attack of the Assyrians (2 Kings 17:5-6), which destroyed the ten northern tribes. It then refers to the later attack of the Babylonians, when Babylon brought Judah into bondage (2 Kings 24:1-3).

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Severe, but not the end

The people had not believed the warnings. Even so, God set a limit on the blow.

The people had not believed the judgment messages (verse 12). Verses 15-18 describe what the invader from the north will do to Israel. Again the promise comes, "I will not make a full end with you." The Lord keeps a remnant among His people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — God searched for one person doing right, from the king down to the man in the street, and found none.

- Instrument — the far-off nation is the Chaldeans. God uses them as a tool, but only under His strict supervision and control.

- Fit — they served foreign gods at home, so they would serve foreign masters abroad. The punishment matches the sin.

- Voice — a language they cannot understand is God humbling a proud people. He was trying to wake them from unbelief, and still they would not hear.

- Limit — the same God who sends the invader refuses to make a full end, keeping a remnant in the middle of His people.

Jeremiah 5:16 · Darby

Their quiver is as an open sepulchre; they are all mighty men.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jeremiah 5:17 · Darby

And they shall eat up thy harvest and thy bread, they shall eat up thy sons and thy daughters, they shall eat up thy flocks and thy herds, they shall eat up thy vines and thy fig-trees; they shall destroy with the sword thy strong cities, wherein thou trustedst.

A far-off, ancient nation is marching on Judah, and this verse lists what that army will swallow — down to the walled cities the people trusted for safety. Two questions follow: why would God hand His own people over, and is anything left when the sword has finished?

The invader is God's chosen instrument

The army described here is not a random disaster of history. Commentators name the rising power and place it in God's hand.

A new power would arise, the Chaldeans. They would invade, and take over homes that were not their own — that is, they would set out to conquer far and wide, and take away Judah's home. They were to be the instrument in the hand of God to bring judgment on the Jews and humble them, as well as other nations.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The threat comes from the law they broke

The wording of this verse was not new to Judah. One writer traces the prophet's words back to the covenant and the law given long before.

In the days of Jeremiah, before the book of the law was found, the whole history of the covenant is already taken for granted. Without the first five books of the Bible it would make no sense… Jeremiah 5:15, "Look, I will bring a nation upon you from far, O house of Israel, says the Lord God… a nation whose language you do not know, nor understand what they say," is a quotation from Deuteronomy 28:49. And Jeremiah 5:17, "they shall eat up your harvest," and so on, comes from Leviticus 26:16 and Deuteronomy 28:31.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer spells out that earlier warning in Leviticus:

They would sow their seed, but their enemies would eat the crop. Their enemies would defeat them in battle and rule over them with hateful oppression.

Modernised from L. M. GrantOriginal wording

Every part of the nation had failed

The loss in this verse reaches every part of life. Commentators point to a failure in Judah that was just as complete.

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord (Jer. 5:3-4)… God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But in politics they were corrupt, in society they were degraded (Jer. 5:7-9), and in religion they had given themselves up to idolatry (v. 19), while prophets, priests and people joined together in lies (vv. 30-31).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A harvest they had planted themselves

The loss of the harvest is itself a harvest. One writer traces the harvest back to the seed, and carries the principle into our own day.

Their sowing was bringing a harvest. They asked, "Why does the LORD our God do all these things to us?" He answers that they had sown their evil seed by forsaking the Lord and serving strange gods. The harvest would be serving strangers in a strange land… The seed now being sown is Bible rejection. Rejecting the gospel of Christ is the seed of falling away, and it will bring a harvest of judgment, as it did with Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The strongholds they trusted

The verse ends by naming what the cities were for: trust. One commentator finds the same misplaced trust in the temple — and then in Christendom.

Man boasts loudest of his own security when he pays least attention to God's sovereign grace and to his own duty to bear true witness to Him. The Jew flattered himself that the temple must stand by God's power, whatever the people might be. So Christendom, fallen and still falling, set up claims that it can never fail and can never be wrong — claims that match its decline, and that belong to God alone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Judgment with a limit

The list of losses stops short of total ruin. The very next verse sets a limit.

Verses 15-18 describe what the invader from the north will do to Israel. Again God gives the promise, "I will not make a full end with you." The Lord keeps a remnant in the middle of His people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown. They planted evil seed by forsaking the Lord for other gods. The invader eating their crops is the harvest of what they sowed.

- Spoken. Nothing here is a surprise sentence. The words come from Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28 — warnings God attached to His covenant long before Judah broke it.

- Sent. The Chaldeans are not an accident of politics. They are the instrument in God's hand to humble His people.

- Stripped. Harvest, children, herds, vines, and last of all the walled cities. That last item is the point: self-security speaks loudest where people heed God least.

- Spared. The sword stops short of a full end. God still keeps a remnant among His people.

Jeremiah 5:18 · Darby

Nevertheless in those days, saith Jehovah, I will not make a full end with you.

Jeremiah has just described a far-away invader who will eat up harvest, flocks, sons and daughters — and then God sets a limit to His own judgment. So what is God holding back, and why stop short when the city's sin has just been exposed as total?

The charge behind the reprieve

The promise does not soften the verdict. It comes while the sentence is still being read out, after a survey in which no part of the nation came out clean.

Jeremiah 5 shows the sin and iniquity to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Yet He will not destroy them completely.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What "a full end" means

Everything turns on the phrase "a full end." It stands for a single word, and its uses elsewhere set its weight.

The word translated consumption, or consummation, elsewhere describes God's judgments carried out to the full… In Jeremiah the same word appears as "full end" in several passages (Jer. 4:27; Jer. 5:10, 18; Jer. 30:11; Jer. 46:28).

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

Not a full end — but a measure

Jeremiah repeats this promise later in his book. There he spells out the gap between what God does to Israel and what He does to the nations that carry her away.

The chapter ends with comfort for the chosen people. After such folly and self-will they might well have feared complete extinction. "I will make a full end of all the nations to which I have driven you, but of you I will not make a full end. I will discipline you in just measure, and I will by no means leave you unpunished." The Lord is full of pity and tender mercy.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the nation survives

Judah had not earned the limit. God keeps something of His own inside the disaster.

The people had not believed the judgment messages (verse 12). Verses 15-18 describe what the invader from the north will do to Israel. Again comes the promise, "I will not make a full end of you." The Lord keeps a remnant in the midst of His people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What God was reaching for

Through these chapters Jeremiah is not only announcing what will happen; he is working on his hearers. One writer ties the sparing of the nation directly to the few whose hearts genuinely turned.

Unless we have been reached in the heart, and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. We may call ourselves "the people of God," as these Jews did, and have priests and a form of religion… But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. Such turn in reality to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him (Jer. 4:27 and 5:18); therefore, He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Spared, and still punished

Being spared is not being let off. The punishment is shaped to fit the sin.

There would not only be desolation and death in the land. The people would serve foreigners in a foreign land, just as they had forsaken the LORD and served foreign gods in their own land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two different things God is doing at once

It helps to see that God is running two lines with the same people, and they must not be confused.

At a point like this we must note the difference between God's ways in government with His people, and His ways in grace. Under the righteous government of God the Jews have been, and still are, under His chastening hand because of their sins and refusal to repent. But the grace and love of His heart towards them never change.

Modernised from Andrew MillerOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. The sin ran through rich and poor alike. The invasion was just, and the reprieve changes none of that.

- Limit. "Full end" is the word for judgment carried through to its finish. God fixes the limit of His own blow before He strikes.

- Measure. Later Jeremiah fills the gap: a full end of the nations, but measured discipline for Israel — spared, yet not let off.

- Remnant. The nation survives because of the few God keeps inside it, true to Him in heart while everything around them falls.

- Two lines. God's government chastened them; His grace never changed toward them. Keep those apart and the verse stops sounding like a contradiction.

Jeremiah 5:19 · Darby

And it shall come to pass, when ye shall say, Wherefore hath Jehovah our God done all these things unto us? then shalt thou say to them, As ye have forsaken me, and served strange gods in your land, so shall ye serve strangers in a land that is not yours.

In chapter 5 God searched Jerusalem for one honest man and found none. Now He tells Jeremiah what the people will ask when the blow falls, and He hands the prophet the answer in advance.

The charge behind the sentence

The corruption God names here was not only religious. One writer names layer after layer of it, ending with the idolatry of verse 19:

God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But in politics they were corrupt, in society they were degraded, and in religion they were given over to idolatry.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Sentence shaped to fit the crime

The punishment mirrors the sin word for word: foreign gods at home, foreign masters abroad. One writer sets the two halves side by side:

There would not only be desolation and death in the land. The people would also serve foreigners in a foreign land, just as they had forsaken the Lord and served foreign gods in their own land.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Given over to what they chose

Israel had lived through this before, in the days of the judges. The rule still holds: God gives us over to whatever we choose to serve.

If the children of Israel would abandon the Lord to serve idols, then the Lord gives them up to serve idolaters. It is so with us. If we sin, this measures and defines our chastisement. And so grace works repentance when we turn and cry to the Lord in our distress.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer draws out what this shows about God's own heart in the act:

It shows us — and it is very touching to see — that our blessed God does not delight in judgment. He does not delight in chastening. He simply allows His people to reap the result of their own folly. It is as though He said: "You see, I am not inflicting this chastisement. I am not bringing evil on you. I am simply showing you the result of your own evil."

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

No one left to blame

The question the people ask assumes someone else is responsible. Jeremiah had already shown that foreign powers only ever gained a hold on Israel after Israel let go of God:

After their redemption neither Egypt nor Assyria had anything to do with Israel until they got away from God. But their hearts, away from God, longed for evil company, and received what they deserved. … If I am away from Him, and His hand is on me, I cannot blame Him. Is the blame His? No, I know Him too well to say that.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

What captivity proves in the end

The answer is not only for Jeremiah's generation. One day the reason for Israel's captivity will be beyond dispute:

In that day it will be plain and undeniable that Israel went into captivity for nothing but their iniquity. This alone was why the Lord withdrew His favour from them and gave them up to the sword of their enemies. It is His retribution that explains their past history with all its sorrows.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The right response to the answer

Once they know the reason, arguing with the sentence is pointless. Writing about the exiles in Babylon, the same writer describes what faith does instead:

The part of faith, when God sends a chastening, is to bow to it, not to fight against it. Suppose the Lord does something because of a wrong on our part. Faith in Him does not make light of the wrong, and it does not make light of the chastening. Faith accepts the chastening with meekness and confesses the wrong.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Served, then serve. Idols at home earned them foreign masters abroad. The punishment repeats the sin back to them.

- Sin measures it. Chastisement is not random. Whatever we abandon God for becomes our master.

- God permits, we reap. He does not delight in judgment; He lets His people see the result of their own choice.

- Blame ends at home. Enemies gained power over Israel only after Israel let go of God. Their own question leaves no one else to accuse.

- Bow, don't fight. Faith accepts the chastening and confesses the wrong. That turning is where grace works repentance.

Jeremiah 5:20 · Darby

Declare this in the house of Jacob, and publish it in Judah, saying,

God tells Jeremiah to take this message public — to the house of Jacob and to Judah. Yet the next verse calls the hearers a people with eyes that do not see and ears that do not hear, so why speak to them at all?

A message made public

The order is not to advise one person. It is an announcement to whole communities.

This involved more than private conversations or talks addressed to a few. Everyone in Jerusalem and in the cities of Judah was to hear the divine warnings by means of a public and general proclamation.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Aimed at the conscience

This message was not about politics. It aimed at the conscience, and that marks Jeremiah's book as a whole.

It is mainly made up of testimony spoken straight to the conscience of the people. It deals with their moral condition at the time the prophet speaks, and it looks ahead to the judgment they were threatened with. Judah had forsaken the Lord, for their repentance under Josiah was only for show, and under the kings who followed him they sank completely.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Foolish, and still religious

One writer gathers up the charges Jeremiah brings against his hearers. The sting is that these same people kept their religion going.

They are foolish (Jer. 5:21), deceitful (Jer. 5:27), dull (Jer. 4:22), hopeless (Jer. 3:25), rebellious (Jer. 4:17), treacherous (Jer. 3:7), and shameless (Ezek. 2:4). This was the state of things that Jeremiah and the remnant had to meet, and these were some of the words he had to say to them. Remember too, that they had their religion. How like the Christian world today.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

They boasted in what they had, even while their lives contradicted it:

They boasted of the ark of the covenant… The temple too was their lying boast, but they had made it a den of thieves. In spite of their wicked and immoral ways they boasted in the law, saying: "We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us."

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

When "will not hear" becomes "cannot hear"

Eyes that do not see and ears that do not hear are more than a sad description. Darby reads it as judgment shaped by the sin itself.

We may add that the judgment of God is according to the iniquity of the people; He brings upon them their iniquity. (Compare Jer. 5:21 and Isa. 6:9, and other passages, as 2 Thess. 2:10-11.)

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Refusing to listen does something to the one who refuses.

The rest were blind and deaf, and the way of conversion and forgiveness was being closed to them. If people will not hear, a time comes when they cannot.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Sowing and reaping

The people had just asked why God was treating them like this. The answer comes back as a harvest.

Their sowing was bringing a harvest. They asked, "Why has the LORD our God done all these things to us?" He answers that they had sown their evil seed by forsaking the Lord and serving strange gods. The harvest would be serving strangers in a strange land… And what was true of that generation is true of this present age also. The seed being sown now is the rejection of the Bible. Rejecting the gospel of Christ is the seed of falling away, and it will bring a harvest of judgment, as it did with Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The prophet who carried it

Jeremiah was not a hard man delivering hard news. He loved the people he had to accuse.

Grief overwhelmed the prophet's heart, because he loved the people. At the same time he had a deep sense of their relationship with the Lord… He had pleaded for the people. He had stood in the gap for them before the Lord. But he saw that it was all in vain: the people rejected God and the testimony that He sent them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Declared. The word was not whispered to a few — everyone in Jerusalem and the cities of Judah was meant to hear it.

- Conscience. The message went straight at how the people were living, with coming judgment in full view.

- Foolish. They kept their religion and their boasting, yet Jeremiah called them deceitful, rebellious and treacherous.

- Deafened. God's judgment matches the sin. Refuse to see, and blindness follows; refuse to hear, and a time comes when you cannot hear.

- Harvest. They sowed the forsaking of God and reaped serving strangers in a strange land. The same seed still brings the same crop.

Jeremiah 5:21 · Darby

Hear now this, O foolish and heartless people, who have eyes and see not; who have ears, and hear not.

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jeremiah 5:22 · Darby

Will ye not fear me? saith Jehovah. Will ye not tremble at my presence, who have set the sand a bound for the sea by a perpetual decree, and it shall not pass it? and its waves toss themselves, but they do not prevail; and they roar, yet can they not pass over it?

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jeremiah 5:23 · Darby

But this people hath a stubborn and a rebellious heart; they have turned aside and are gone.

Jeremiah 5 records God's search through Jerusalem for one honest person, and this verse is His verdict. Just before it, God points to the sea, which keeps the limit He set — while the heart of His people will not.

The Verdict on a Whole Nation

The charge is not aimed at a criminal class. It falls on everyone in the city, though God still sets a limit to the judgment.

In Jeremiah 5 the sin and iniquity are shown to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Still, He will not destroy entirely.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The failure ran through every level of the nation, from the top down.

From the king down to the man in the street not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told, "There was no man"! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the LORD. "I will go to the great men," said the prophet, but they were just as evil. The eyes of the LORD look for truth, yet not one man could be found in step with it. God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But in politics they were corrupt, in society they were debased, and in religion they were given over to idolatry.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The One Rebel in Creation

Everything else God made serves the purpose He gave it. Only one creature refuses.

The lifeless creation answers the end of its existence: the display of its Creator's wisdom, power, and glory. The planets circle their centres. The seasons follow each other in due course. The rain and dew make the soil fruitful, and the earth yields its rich variety of fruits. All these, even the lower ranks of living creatures obeying the instincts they have, serve the well-being of man and display the glory of his and their Creator. But man himself is a rebel — the only being among them all gifted with the capacity of intelligent obedience!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The sea is not only a lesson in obedience. Its restless waters carry a further meaning.

The waters stand for the evil within us, and the restless sea is the type of it. "The wicked are like the tossing sea; for it cannot be quiet, and its waters toss up mire and dirt." This last is the action of the surf upon the shore. Such beating against its limits is a picture of us: "The mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot."

Modernised from F. W. GrantOriginal wording

A Revolt Inside the Heart

The verse puts the turning in the past tense. One writer notes where it had already happened.

They were in revolt and gone in heart already. People, prophets, priests loved falsehood together.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Later in the book Jeremiah comes back to the heart itself.

The heart of man is incurable, however, and so deceitful that no one of Adam's sinful stock can fathom its depravity. It is set to do evil and to depart from God, however greatly privileged it may be.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What the Heart Reaps

Later in the chapter the people ask God why all this is happening to them.

Their sowing was bringing a harvest. They asked, "Why has the LORD our God done all these things to us?" He answers them that they had sown their evil seed by forsaking the LORD and serving strange gods; the harvest would be serving strangers in a strange land. Their sins and iniquities had turned away the good things promised.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Where the Cure Must Reach

If the fault is in the heart, that is where the remedy has to land.

The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the LORD," the circumcision which touches the heart, preparing it for Him. With pleading and warning he works to reach them this way. It is the same today. Unless we have been reached in the heart, and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. That is true even when, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Boundary. The sea keeps the limit God set for it; the human heart is the one part of creation that refuses its Maker's order.

- Heart. The revolt was inward before it was visible — the people were "in revolt and gone in heart already."

- Depth. This is not a local Jewish failure but a heart "set to do evil and to depart from God," which no privilege corrects.

- Harvest. Forsaking the Lord sowed a seed; serving strangers in a strange land was the crop it produced.

- Cure. Only a work that reaches the very centre of a person counts. Religious forms and titles leave someone still far from the living God.

Jeremiah 5:24 · Darby

And they say not in their heart, Let us now fear Jehovah our God, that giveth rain, both the early and the latter, in its season; who preserveth unto us the appointed weeks of harvest.

God names here the one thing Judah never said to itself: that they should fear the God who sends their rain and guards their harvest. Why did the plainest evidence of His goodness — weather, crop, food on the table — stir no fear of Him at all?

The land that lived by rain

Israel's life hung on rain falling when it should. That set the land apart from Egypt. Older translations call the autumn and spring rains the early and the latter rain.

Palestine was different from Egypt. Its plant life depended on rain from heaven, not on water from the river. Rain fell regularly except when God withheld it as chastening. Deuteronomy 11:11-17. We read of the "early rain" and the "latter rain." The early rain was connected with the sowing of seed... and the latter rain in spring.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

God Himself farmed that land. Where His people stayed loyal, the whole farming year showed His skill.

The LORD was the farmer of the land of Israel (Deuteronomy 11). If Israel had stayed in simple loyalty to Him, everything would have shown the care and skill of the divine farmer, and the blessing of a people who had the LORD for their God. There would have been nothing out of season: the early and the latter rain would have fallen only in their appointed months.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Weeks that were counted

The verse says God keeps "the weeks appointed for the harvest." The Hebrew word behind "weeks" means "sevens."

When referring to time-periods in the Old Testament, this word "sevens" is usually the same as weeks of seven days each. Indeed, this is its general usage, as in Exodus 34:22, Leviticus 12:5, Numbers 28:26 and Jeremiah 5:24.

Modernised from William J HockingOriginal wording

God was not only sending rain; He was keeping a calendar, holding weeks in reserve for them.

A witness nobody reads

The prophet's comparison is deliberately humbling, and it reaches far past ancient Judah.

The donkey knows who feeds it, "but My people does not consider." The beast knows whose hand its provisions come from, but not man! Yet, as Paul told the men of Lystra in Acts 14:17, God has never left Himself without witness, in that He has done men good, giving rain from heaven and fruitful seasons, filling men's hearts with food and gladness. But do men acknowledge His hand?... If men fail to own God in His lesser gifts, what is their bearing towards the stupendous gift of His Son?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Resting in the stream instead of the Fountain

The verse puts the fault inside them: they did not say it "in their hearts." That danger is not ancient history.

Are we not prone to forget the LORD our God, to rest in His gifts instead of Himself? Alas! alas! we cannot deny it. We rest in the stream, instead of getting up to the Fountain. Mercies, blessings and benefits lie thick along our path. We turn them into an occasion for self-satisfaction and self-congratulation, instead of finding in them the ground of continual praise and thanksgiving.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

When the rain stops

They asked why God was doing all this to them. The answer was their own sowing.

Their sowing was bringing a harvest... He answers them that they had sown their evil seed in forsaking the LORD and serving strange gods; the harvest would be serving strangers in a strange land. Their sins and wrongdoing had turned away the good things He promised... What was true of that generation is true of this present age too. The seed being sown now is the rejection of the Bible and of the gospel of Christ; that seed of falling away from God will bring a harvest of judgment, as it did with Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

But God's aim in holding back the rain was not only to punish.

Israel disobeyed and turned away from their God, and so lost this promise. God then withheld both the early and the latter rain to correct them. But He meant to do good to Jerusalem and to His people. So He encourages them to seek His face and have their old blessing back... God never withholds from His people except to draw out their sense of need, and to teach them that He alone is the source.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Given — the early and latter rains were God's own farming of a land that lived by rain from heaven. He kept the harvest weeks in reserve.

- Ignored — the donkey knows who feeds it. Man takes the rain and the harvest and never owns the hand behind them.

- Inward — the fault sits in the heart. We rest in the stream instead of climbing to the Fountain.

- Withdrawn — sin turns the good things away. Evil seed sown brings a harvest of loss, then and now.

- Restored — God withholds only to draw out a sense of need, and He invites His people to ask Him again for the rain.

Jeremiah 5:25 · Darby

Your iniquities have turned away these things, and your sins have withholden from you what is good.

Judah's harvests were failing, and the people were asking why the Lord had done this to them. This verse turns the question back on them: the fault was their own sin.

The Harvest They Sowed

One commentator connects the verse to the question the people had been asking:

Their sowing was bringing a harvest. They asked, "Why has the LORD our God done all these things to us?" He answers that they had sown their evil seed by forsaking the Lord and serving strange gods. The harvest would be serving strangers in a strange land. The good things promised had been turned away by their sins and iniquities. And what was true of that generation is true of this present age also. The seed being sown now is the rejection of the Bible. The rejection of the gospel of Christ is the seed of apostasy, and it will bring a harvest of judgment, as it did with Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What the Good Things Were

The good kept back had a name. God had promised it long before, with a condition attached:

The Lord's original promise to Israel was this: if they would "indeed obey my commandments … to love the LORD your God, and to serve Him with all your heart and with all your soul," then "He will give the rain for your land in its season, the early rain and the later rain, that you may gather in your grain and your wine and your oil" (Deut. 11:13-14). But Israel disobeyed and turned away from their God. They forfeited this promise, and God in chastisement withheld both the early and the later rain.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Where the Fault Lies

God is not stingy, and He has not grown tired of giving. The fault lies on the other side:

If for any reason divine blessing is withheld, the house of bread becomes a place of famine. We know well that it is not the desire of God that His people should suffer. He is no miser, and if the rain is withheld, the fault is with His people and not with Him. He had emphasised this for them, so that they well understood that when heaven was "shut up" it was in chastening.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

Loss With a Purpose

A season of loss is a message, not just a misfortune. It has a purpose, and ignoring that purpose costs something:

A second lesson is this: God's ways of government with His people aim to make them lay their condition to heart. That is why He uses His rod... And nothing shows how unfeeling our hearts are more plainly than this. We pass through trials, whether on our own or together with the church. Then we pay little or no attention to what God had in view, and we flatter ourselves that all is well. Every stroke of God's rod should produce deep searching of heart. Where it does not, harder chastening from His hand is sure to follow.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Asking God for What Sin Is Blocking

One temptation is to keep the sin and simply pray harder for the good. That route is closed:

It is useless to pray while persisting in sin. The man who does not seek to walk with God has no right to expect anything from Him... Obedience gives confidence. You cannot ask in faith while clinging to something that grieves the Holy Spirit and dishonours the Lord Jesus Christ. If prayer is not answered, if the heavens seem like brass, it is a solemn sign that the soul is in a wrong state. It should lead to self-judgment and to forsaking every evil way.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

The Root Is the Heart, Not the Religion

Judah had priests and a religion, yet the good was still held back. Jeremiah aimed at something deeper:

The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the Lord" — the circumcision that touches the heart and prepares it for Him. With pleadings and warnings he works to reach them. It is the same today. Unless we are reached in the heart, and in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. That is true even if, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Sowing. Judah's losses were the harvest of their own seed. They forsook the Lord and served other gods, and the crop was serving strangers in a foreign land.

- Forfeited. The good withheld was the promised early and later rain, with its grain, wine and oil. God tied that promise to obedience, and disobedience forfeited it.

- Not God. God is no miser and does not want His people to suffer; when heaven is shut, the fault lies with them, not with Him.

- Search. Every stroke of God's rod is meant to make His people lay their condition to heart. Ignoring it invites a heavier hand.

- Heart. Priesthood, prayer and religious form cannot remove the barrier. Only a heart truly reached, with evil forsaken, opens the way back to blessing.

Jeremiah 5:26 · Darby

For among my people are found wicked [men] they lay wait, as fowlers stoop down; they set a trap, they catch men.

Jeremiah is describing God's own nation, and this verse points to men inside it who hunt other people the way a bird-catcher hunts birds. The sting lies in the first phrase: they were found among His people, not outside them.

Wickedness inside the covenant people

The chapter's charge is not aimed at one class. It sweeps through every level of the nation, and one commentator reads the whole chapter as a demonstration of exactly that.

Jeremiah 5 shows the sin and iniquity to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. The chapter points out the source of the evil, or at least what keeps it going. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule through them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The chapter opens with a search for one honest man, and it comes up empty.

From the king down to the man in the street, not one could be found to meet the situation. We are told there was no man! There were plenty of strong men and hard men, but they did not know the way of the Lord (Jer. 5:3-4). God Himself said to His servant, "if you can find a man, one who does justice and seeks truth, that I may pardon her" (Jer. 5:1).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The trap, the snare, and the catch

The picture is bird-catching: a crouching hunter, a hidden snare, a cage to fill. But the catch here is people, and the catchers grow rich on it. One writer follows these men from verses 25 to 29 into the New Testament.

Verses 25 to 29 single out some especially wicked men. They have no thought for the needy, yet they prosper themselves. They are cunning, and they craftily lie in wait to catch men. From these verses the Holy Spirit seems to draw the language for the letter to the Ephesians. It pictures the kind of men who trap weak Christians today — especially "the babes" in Christ, as we read in Ephesians 4:14: "by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes". As in Israel's day, these deceivers were prominent and great among God's people, and it is the same today among those who profess Christ.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

(Older translations of Ephesians 4:14 read "cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive" — the same "lie in wait" that Jeremiah uses here. That is the echo the writer hears.)

Two ways to catch men

The words "catch men" turn up again on the lips of Jesus. One commentator sets the two callings side by side.

Jesus said to the trembling fisherman, "Do not be afraid; from now on you will be catching men." In Jeremiah 5:26 we read of leaders in wickedness who "catch men"; here we have Simon commissioned to catch men for Christ and for heaven. For this great work God acknowledges no other means than the Gospel. No new story and no side attractions can ever be expected to receive His approval. In Acts 2 we have an example of fishing with a net, when three thousand souls were blessed; in Acts 8 we see a man fishing with a hook — Philip landing the individual eunuch for Christ. Both public and individual work remain open to us today.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The same skill, the same patience, the same waiting — turned either to destruction or to rescue.

God does not overlook it

The men in this verse trap others in the dark and count on nobody noticing. The chapter answers that assumption directly, and its answer is repeated twice for weight.

They were already in revolt and gone in heart. "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD, and shall I not avenge myself on a nation such as this?" is the twofold witness of the prophet. People, prophets, priests loved falsehood together.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What God preserves

Judgment is not the last word in these chapters. God keeps a people for Himself even while the nation stands condemned.

Israel made high claims, but they did not know the Lord! They were "foolish children" with "no understanding". They were "wise to do evil", but they had no knowledge of how to do good (Jer. 4:22). Woe and anguish must therefore come upon them. But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. Such turn in reality to the Lord Himself, and they are true in heart to Him (Jer. 4:27 and 5:18); therefore, He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Inside. These men sit among God's people, not outside them. The rot runs through rich and poor, prophets and priests alike.

- Cunning. Their method is the bird-catcher's: crouch, hide the snare, wait. Ephesians 4:14 uses the same picture for men who prey on young or unsettled believers.

- Catching. The same two words fit two opposite callings. One man traps people to fill his own cage. The fisherman Jesus called catches men for Christ by the gospel.

- Judged. Twice the prophet asks whether God will let this pass. The hidden snare stands in full view of the God who judges.

- Remnant. Judgment falls, but God keeps for Himself those who are true in heart to Him — He does not make a full end.

Jeremiah 5:27 · Darby

As a cage full of birds, so are their houses full of deceit therefore they are become great, and have enriched themselves.

Jeremiah 5 describes men who lie in wait to catch their neighbours. Verse 27 gives the picture that sums them up: God looks at their houses and sees a birdcatcher's cage, crammed with captives.

The Picture in the Verse

The image comes from the bird trade. A trapper's basket holds living creatures he has caught by stealth. That crammed fullness is the point of comparison.

It is said symbolically that as a cage or trap is full of birds, so the houses of the Jews were full of deceit. Jer. 5:27.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Men Behind the Trap

Verse 27 does not stand alone. It sits inside a short portrait of one class of men. A commentator names what they do and who they forget.

Some specially wicked men are singled out in verses 25 to 29. They have no thought for the needy, yet they prosper themselves. They are cunning, they craftily lie in wait to catch men. The Holy Spirit seems to draw on these verses in the letter to the Ephesians, to show the kind of men who trap weak Christians today — especially "the babes" in Christ. As we read, "By the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive" (Eph. 4:14).

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Catching Men — Two Ways

The phrase "catch men" appears again in the Gospels, on the lips of Jesus, and the contrast between the two uses is deliberate. One writer sets them side by side.

In Jer. 5:26 we read of leaders in wickedness who "catch men." Here we have Simon commissioned to catch men for Christ and for heaven.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The same phrase covers both: one man catches people to ruin them, the other catches them for Christ.

Greatness and Riches That Convict

The verse ties the fraud to the fortune: deceit is what made these men great and rich. Their wealth is not a sign of God's approval. It is the evidence against them. And the rot was not limited to a few.

Jeremiah 5 shows the sin and iniquity to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? says the Lord." Still, He will not destroy entirely.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer traces where that corruption left the nation.

So every source of moral uprightness was corrupted, and it was plain that nothing but judgment could come to them from the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where the Cage Appears Again

The cage of birds does not stay in Jeremiah. The same writer follows the picture into the Bible's description of fallen Babylon.

"A cage of every unclean and hateful bird" is a description of symbolic Babylon. Revelation 18:2. The word used there is often translated "prison."

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Another writer explains what those birds stand for.

"A hold of every unclean and hated bird." We gather that demons and unclean spirits referred to in our text are personal beings. The unclean birds, birds of prey and of darkness, signify the many and varied agents of Satan (Matt. 13:4, 32; Jer. 5:27; especially Isa. 34:11-15), and they are, of course, deeply harmful and destructive. So Babylon is a cesspool of corruption, an abomination in the sight of God.

Modernised from Walter ScottOriginal wording

The roles shift between the two passages. In Jeremiah the wicked men hold the cage; in Revelation Babylon is itself the cage that houses evil. Either way, the picture is a place packed with what God hates.

Summary

- The cage. A trapper's basket crammed with birds is the measure: that is how full of deceit these houses are.

- The trappers. They lie in wait to catch men, and the same people who have no thought for the needy see their own affairs prosper.

- The gain. Greatness and riches follow the deceit. In this chapter wealth is not evidence of God's favour but of fraud.

- The reach. The corruption ran through rich and poor alike. Every source of moral uprightness was corrupted, so nothing but judgment could come.

- The reckoning. God's answer to the packed cage is a question, not a shrug: will He not punish a nation for these things? Yet He will not destroy it entirely.

Jeremiah 5:28 · Darby

They are become fat, they shine, yea, they surpass in deeds of wickedness; they judge not the cause, the cause of the fatherless, and they prosper; and the right of the needy do they not adjudge.

This verse sits inside God's case against Jerusalem. It describes the men who did best out of that society: well fed, successful, and deaf to the fatherless and the needy.

What "fat" pictures

In the Bible, being fat pictures a thriving life. But a thriving body can house a starving soul.

Fat is always in Scripture the symbol of a prosperous condition, although, it may be, of such temporal prosperity as might result in an opposite state of soul. "But Jeshurun grew fat, and kicked," says the lawgiver in his last prophetic "song"; "you grew fat, stout, and sleek; then he forsook God who made him and scoffed at the Rock of his salvation."

Frederick W Grant (Deuteronomy 32:15, given here in the ESV)

Who these men are

The verse says these men "know no bounds in deeds of evil." They are not the poor and desperate. They are the successful, and they prey on the people around them.

Some specially wicked men are singled out in verses 25 to 29. They have no thought for the needy, yet they prosper themselves. They are cunning, they craftily lie in wait to catch men. From these verses the Holy Spirit seems to take for the letter to the Ephesians to illustrate the sort of men who ensnare feeble Christians today — especially "the babes" in Christ; as we read, "by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes."

H J Vine (Ephesians 4:14, given here in the ESV)

Not one class, but all

It would be comforting to think this describes only a corrupt elite. The chapter closes that escape route.

Jeremiah 5 shows the sin and iniquity to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Still, He will not destroy them entirely. The chapter points out the source of the evil, or at least what keeps it going. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule through them.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Religion tidied up, hearts untouched

Jeremiah preached under King Josiah, who cleaned up the nation's public worship. The reform was real, but it stopped at the surface.

The book of Jeremiah, who prophesied under Josiah, shows us that the moral state of the people was in no way changed. They agreed easily to the removal of idolatry, which came through the faithfulness of the king. But their hearts remained as far removed from God as ever.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The harvest of what was sown

Nothing here is arbitrary. The people had a complaint of their own, and God answered it with a picture of harvest.

Their sowing was bringing a harvest. They asked, "Why has the LORD our God done all these things to us?" He answers that they had sown their evil seed by forsaking the Lord and serving strange gods. The harvest would be serving strangers in a strange land. Their sins and iniquities had turned away the good things God promised. The question of verse 9 comes back again in verse 29.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The opposite of this verse

These men will not judge the cause of the fatherless. Jeremiah later points to a king who did the opposite, and that king's record becomes God's own definition of knowing Him.

In his early days Josiah was a beautiful picture of the coming King, who would judge the poor and deliver the needy. Jeremiah refers to it with feeling: "He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well." Then the prophet adds a word of great practical weight for anyone who sees how vital it is to truly know God: "Is not this to know Me? declares the LORD."

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Fat — In Scripture, fatness stands for prosperity. That prosperity can leave the soul in the opposite state.

- Full, then forgetful — Jeshurun grew fat and kicked. He forsook the God who made him, and comfort became the doorway to contempt.

- Cunning — These men prospered and gave the needy no thought. They lay in wait to catch others, the same trap set for young believers today.

- Universal — Rich and poor alike were in it. False prophets spoke lies, and priests ruled through them.

- Visited — The harvest matched the sowing, and twice God asks, "Shall I not punish them for these things?" The man He looks for judges the cause of the poor. That is what it means to know Him.

Jeremiah 5:29 · Darby

Shall I not visit for these things? saith Jehovah; shall not my soul be avenged on such a nation as this?

Near the end of Jeremiah 5, God asks whether He can let such a people go unpunished. He had used the same words twenty verses earlier. The chapter has already listed Judah's crimes. The question now is what God will do about them.

A Question Asked Twice

The wording of verse 29 is not new. It repeats verse 9 exactly, and one writer treats the two as a single sustained charge running through the middle of the chapter — a judgment announced, then sealed:

Nor would it be only desolation and death in the land, but the people would serve strangers in a foreign land, just as they had forsaken Jehovah and served strange gods in their own land. They were already in revolt and gone in heart. "Shall I not visit for these things? [recounting their iniquities] says the Lord: shall not my soul be avenged on such a nation as this?" is the twofold witness of the prophet. (Verses 9-29.) People, prophets, priests loved falsehood together.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "These Things" Were

"These things" points back to the men named just before, not to the nation in general. One writer traces the same description forward into the New Testament letter to the Ephesians:

Verses 25 to 29 single out some especially wicked men. They have no thought for the needy, yet they prosper themselves. They are cunning, and they lie in wait to catch men. From these verses the Holy Spirit seems to take language for the letter to the Ephesians. It pictures the kind of men who trap weak Christians today — especially "the babes" in Christ. As we read, "By the trickery of men, by cunning craftiness, they lie in wait to deceive" (Eph. 4:14).

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Verse 27 sums those men up in a single picture:

The picture is symbolic: as a cage or trap is full of birds, so the houses of the Jews were full of deceit. Jer. 5:27.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why God Could Not Simply Pardon

Why not forgive instead? One writer answers that pardon here would have meant approving the very thing that dishonoured God:

How should the Lord pardon Jerusalem for this? Could He reward His own dishonour? Could He approve the worst depravity? Still, the judgment would be measured, even though they lied about the Lord and His discipline.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Nearness to God Raises the Standard

"A nation such as this" is not just any nation. It is the one people God says He has known, and that nearness makes the judgment heavier, not lighter:

He is gracious beyond measure. But we know Him who said, To Me belongs vengeance: I will repay, says the Lord; and again, The Lord will judge His people. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God (Heb. 10:30-31). If He punished the vile abominations of the doomed nations who had intruded into His land, He disciplines His own people far more strictly. "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities" (Amos 3:2).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Judgment That Stops Short of the End

The threat is real, but it is not total. Darby sets the sweep of the guilt against the limit God sets for Himself, and names the conqueror who would carry the judgment out:

Jeremiah 5 shows the sin and iniquity to be universal: rich and poor, all alike. And "Shall not I visit for these things? says Jehovah." Still, He will not destroy entirely. … Both these chapters clearly declare the coming of Nebuchadnezzar in judgment.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Harvest Principle

Verse 29 answers a question the people themselves had asked: why is God doing all this to us? One commentator states the answer as a law of harvest, and carries it into the present:

Their sowing was bringing a harvest. They asked, "Why has the LORD our God done all these things to us?" He answers that they had sown their evil seed by forsaking the Lord and serving strange gods. The harvest would be serving strangers in a strange land. Their sins and iniquities had turned away the good things promised. And what was true of that generation is true of this present age also.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Sown. The people asked why disaster came. They had planted it themselves, and the harvest matched the seed.

- Seen. The crop was cruelty dressed as success. These men prospered, ignored the needy, and trapped others like birds in a cage.

- Sealed. The same question stands in verse 9 and in verse 29 — the prophet's twofold witness.

- Severe. Pardon would have meant God rewarding His own dishonour. He chastens those nearest to Him most strictly, not least.

- Spared. The judgment was measured. God struck the nation, but He would not destroy it entirely.

Jeremiah 5:30 · Darby

An appalling and horrible thing is committed in the land

Jeremiah 5 builds its case against all Judah, rich and poor alike, and at verse 30 the charge becomes a cry of shock. God calls what is happening in His own land appalling, and the next verse names the prophets, the priests, and a people happy with both.

Corruption at the source

The chapter first spreads the guilt across every class, then names what feeds it.

In Jeremiah 5 the sin and evil are shown to reach everyone: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Still, He will not destroy completely. The source of evil, or at least what keeps it going, is pointed out. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The corruption reached the springs, not just the surface.

So all the springs of moral uprightness were corrupted. It was therefore plain that nothing but judgment could come to them from the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why "in the land" matters

The word "land" matters. God had already acted against horrors on this same ground, against the nations who lived there before Israel.

The seven nations of Canaan had lived in the land before Israel, and they did horrible things in it. It was so bad that God sent Israel against them under Joshua with orders to wipe them out. But now the Lord has to say through Jeremiah that an appalling and horrible thing has happened in the land. The prophets prophesy falsely, the priests rule at their direction, and "my people love to have it so." And the question follows: "what will you do when the end comes?" What God did through the Babylonian king "when the end came," Jeremiah had to watch and live through, to his deep sorrow. We can get some idea of how deep his grief was if we read the book of Lamentations, which follows his main prophecy.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Not innocent bystanders

Verse 30 reads like a charge against bad leaders. But false teachers cannot hold a place the people have not given them.

Here we see the false prophets, claiming to reveal God's mind, and the priests ruling by this. But such a state of things would be impossible if the people were not willing. People who are linked to God in outward form only are glad to have a worldly priesthood. So in the history of the professing church we see the dreadful wickedness of the priests. But we must remember that it only mirrored the state of a worldly people — the people of God in name only.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The people had their own reason to like the arrangement.

In the middle of Israel there was a great deal of false teaching. Through it the priests gained a dominating place. But, said the Lord, "my people love to have it so." The people wanted their sinful pleasures and were quite content to let the priests do their religious duties for them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

When leadership is godly

The tie between leaders and people can also run the right way, and that is worth thanks.

Very often the leaders of God's people, in Judaism and in Christianity, have led them against His will. And the people have been quite willing to take a wrong course. This is shown in Jeremiah 5:30-31… How good it is when the saints of God are under godly leadership: it is indeed something for which to "Bless the LORD."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The same pattern, read today

The pattern did not stay in Judah's day.

False prophets, false priests, and the people were satisfied with it. How is it going to be in the end? Both prophets and priests were in league against the prophet of God. They misled the people; they were a curse instead of a blessing. It is not unlike the religious conditions in Christendom today.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Appalling. God Himself calls the situation appalling. What He names is the rot in His own prophets and priests.

- Source. The evil reached rich and poor alike. What kept it running was false prophets, with priests ruling through them.

- Willing. The system needed a willing audience. The people wanted their pleasures and let the priests handle religion for them.

- End. Babylon answered the question "what will you do when the end comes?" Jeremiah lived through that answer, and Lamentations records his grief.

- Mercy. Even in that judgment God would not destroy completely. And when God's people have godly leadership, that is something to "Bless the LORD" for.

Jeremiah 5:31 · Darby

the prophets prophesy falsehood, and the priests rule by their means; and my people love [to have it] so. But what will ye do in the end thereof?

Three parties share the blame in this verse: prophets who lie, priests who rule through those lies, and a people glad to have it so. The chapter has already exposed sin at every level of Judah, and now the Lord asks where such an arrangement can end.

The source that keeps the evil alive

Judgment is certain, yet God will not wipe the nation out. The chapter also names what keeps the evil alive.

Jeremiah 5 shows sin and iniquity everywhere: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Yet He will not destroy entirely. It also points out the source of evil, or at least what keeps it going. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Lying in God's name

These prophets were not outsiders. They moved among God's people and used God's name, and Jeremiah faced one of them head-on.

These false prophets, though moving among God's people, "prophesied by Baal and went after things that do not profit" (Jer. 2:8), and yet they used the Lord's name, though He "did not send them" (Jer. 14:15)… In Jeremiah 28 we read of Hananiah, who prophesied falsely in the Name of the Lord. Opposing Jeremiah, he made the people trust in a lie. "Therefore thus says the LORD: 'Behold, I will remove you from the face of the earth. This year you shall die, because you have uttered rebellion against the LORD.' In that same year, in the seventh month, the prophet Hananiah died."

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Why the lie sold so well

Why did this preaching win such a hearing?

It was more popular to prophesy smooth things and deceits, and nothing is so dear to the human heart as having God's approval on its own sinful desires. So prophets grew popular by saying, "Thus says the LORD," when the Lord had not spoken. We should not suppose that these prophets were always inventing lies; they corrupted the word of God and made it suit man's taste.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Priests ruling, people relieved

The second clause says the priests ruled through the false prophets. That gain of position was matched by a convenience on the other side.

In the midst of Israel there was much false teaching, and by it the priests gained a dominating place. But, said the Lord, "My people love to have it so." The people wanted their sinful pleasures and were quite content to let the priests do their religious duties for them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The people are not bystanders

"My people love to have it so" is the sting of the verse. It moves the guilt from the pulpit to the pew, and the traffic runs both ways.

Here we see the false prophets claiming to reveal God's mind, and the priests ruling by this. But such a state would be impossible if the people were not willing. People who are connected with God only on the outside are glad to have an unspiritual priesthood… A godly priest would do much to hold back the evil among the people. A godless one would speed up their decline. So the responsibility of those in such a place is solemn. But remember the main point: a people away from God make a wicked priesthood possible, and a wicked priesthood drives them further from God.

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

The same trade repeated

The verse describes a pattern, not just one moment in Judah's past.

The split between clergy and laity is a miserable thing, and Scripture knows nothing of it. It spread so fast and so widely only because it suited the tastes of the very people it pushed aside and degraded. This came true not only in Israel but in the Christian world: "the prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction; my people love to have it so!" Alas, they did, and they do. As spiritual decline sets in, a heart turning to the world trades away its spiritual birthright without hesitation — as Esau traded his for a bowl of stew. It is glad to hand its care for spiritual things to those who will take the responsibility instead. Worldliness is well covered with a layman's cloak.

Modernised from Frederick W. GrantOriginal wording

The end came

The closing question was not rhetorical. Jeremiah lived long enough to watch it answered.

What God did through the Babylonian king "in the end," Jeremiah had to see and experience to his deep sorrow. We may get some idea of the depth of his grief if we read the book of Lamentations, which follows his main prophecy.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Lie. False prophets kept saying "Thus says the LORD" when God had not spoken. They did not invent it all; they bent His word to human taste.

- Rule. The lies gave the priests their power, and religion turned into something other people did on your behalf.

- Love. The system could not stand without willing hearers. "My people love to have it so" puts the guilt on the pew as well as the pulpit.

- Repeat. The same bargain returns whenever people trade their spiritual birthright for an easier, more worldly life.

- End. Babylon answered Jeremiah's question, and his grief fills the book of Lamentations.

Jeremiah 6:1 · Darby

Flee for safety, ye children of Benjamin, out of the midst of Jerusalem, and blow the trumpet in Tekoa, and set up a signal in Beth-haccerem; for evil appeareth out of the north, and a great destruction.

The chapter opens with an evacuation order, not a sermon: a trumpet, a signal fire, and a road out of the city. Two questions follow. Who is the enemy coming from the north, and what happened to the people who obeyed?

An alarm at the close of a long charge

The order comes at the end of a long charge against Judah. One writer shows how chapter 6 raises the pressure.

This closing part of the charge adds to the terrors of the scene, first by the call to the Benjamites to leave the doomed city. Zion was only a lovely and delicate woman, unable to defend her neighbours. Next, the prophet orders the besieging armies to come against Jerusalem, and this because greed and deceit were everywhere.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Behind the alarm lay the state of the people themselves.

So corruption had spoiled every spring of moral uprightness. It was therefore clear that nothing but judgment could come to them from the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The disaster looking out of the north

The threat has a name. One writer identifies the empire behind it.

Jeremiah from first to last dwells a great deal on Babylon. Babylon was this northern power that is in the mind of the Spirit of God throughout. It is not the Assyrian. The Assyrian was northern too, but the Assyrian power was now destroyed, and only in the last days will Assyria rise again.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Another writer names the king and lists the sights and sounds of his approach.

From Jeremiah 4:3 to the end of chapter 6 the prophet deals with the state of Israel. There was no man to save the sorrowful situation! So God raises up the instrument of His anger. The event the book points to is about to happen. Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sound is heard! Evil comes and a great destruction! Set up a sign of fire!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Two hilltops chosen for the job

The two places named are not decoration. Height explains both of them.

Tekoa was a city of Judah. Rehoboam built or fortified it "for defence" (2 Chronicles 11:6). Because it stood on a hill, it was a good place for blowing the trumpet in time of danger, as in Jeremiah 6:1.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The verse pairs Tekoa with a second site.

A place near Tekoa in Judah, used as a beacon hill.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why Jeremiah calls to Benjamin

Jeremiah names one tribe. It was his own.

Jeremiah was the son of Hilkiah, one of the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The call was not wasted breath.

The children of Benjamin are urged to flee for safety because of the evil from the north. There were probably God-fearing men among the Benjamites. Those who paid attention to the call fled and escaped.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The trumpet before the sword

In this verse the alarm comes first and the invasion after. One writer finds a settled pattern in that order.

It is God's way to sound the trumpet before He draws His sword. Turn to Ezekiel 33:4-5 and you will see this plainly. "Then if anyone who hears the sound of the trumpet does not take warning, and the sword comes and takes him away, his blood shall be upon his own head... He heard the sound of the trumpet and did not take warning." So before God destroyed the earth by water, He sounded the warning trumpet through Noah. In our own time, before the last stroke falls, His trumpet sounds in the gospel call. Will you not listen to it, and seek salvation while you may? "Is a trumpet blown in a city, and the people are not afraid?"

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Sound. A trumpet at Tekoa and a beacon fire at Beth-haccherem. Both sit on hilltops, so the warning could travel fast and far.

- Source. The disaster from the north is Babylon under Nebuchadnezzar. It is not Assyria, whose power was already broken.

- Cause. Corruption had spoiled every spring of moral uprightness in the nation, so nothing but judgment could come.

- Escape. Jeremiah warned his own tribe, Benjamin. Those who listened got out alive.

- Pattern. God sounds the trumpet before He draws the sword. The same order runs from Noah to the gospel call today. The only question left is whether anyone moves.

Jeremiah 6:2 · Darby

The comely and delicate one do I cut off, the daughter of Zion.

Jeremiah has just told the people of Benjamin to flee Jerusalem and sound the alarm. Now he names the one marked for destruction: Zion herself, a lovely and pampered woman — but is that God's last word about her?

The picture behind the words

Older translations read the verse as a comparison: God has likened the daughter of Zion to a beautiful and delicate woman. Either way, the picture shows Zion's helplessness. She looks lovely, but she cannot fight:

This closing part of the charge adds to the terrors of the scene. First comes the call to the Benjamites to leave the doomed city. Zion was only a lovely and delicate woman, unable to defend her neighbours. Next, the prophet commissions the besiegers to come against Jerusalem, and this because of universal covetousness and deceit.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Zion cannot even shelter the towns around her, so her own people are told to get out.

Who "the daughter of Zion" is

The phrase is not a title for a building or a hill. It is poetry for a people. One writer explains where the name comes from and how the prophets use it:

In the plain sense, Zion was the south-eastern hill called David's city. Moriah was the north-eastern hill, where the LORD's house was built. But Zion (Isaiah 1:27) is often used figuratively by the prophets, and as a synonym for Jerusalem as a whole. "Daughter of Zion" (as in Isaiah 1:9) is a poetic way of naming the people who lived in the Jewish capital, and so the nation in general. … But we may add that it is nothing but ignorance to assume that Zion anywhere means the church of God, even as a picture.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

So the woman under sentence is a real nation of people. The warning lands on them, not on the church.

The destroyer already on the way

The threat was already on the march. One writer names the army's commander and the direction it came from:

From Jeremiah 4:3 to the end of Jeremiah 6 the prophet deals with the state of Israel. Chaos once overtook the distant creation of Genesis 1:1. Ignorance of God and injustice were bringing the same chaos on the nation. There was no man to save the sorrowful situation. So God raises up the instrument of His anger! The event this book points to is about to happen! Nebuchadnezzar—the lion of Babylon—the destroyer from the north is coming!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why the sentence fell

Beauty did not shield Zion. The charge in these chapters spares no one:

Jeremiah 5 shows that sin and iniquity are everywhere: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Still, He will not destroy them entirely. The chapter points out the source of the evil, or at least what keeps it going. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule by their means. Jeremiah 6 continues the testimony, but also gives Jeremiah's position in the middle of all this evil.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A remnant God keeps

God's refusal to destroy them entirely is not a loophole. It is how He has always worked:

Israel made high claims, but they did not know the Lord! They were "stupid children" with "no understanding". They were "wise" in doing evil, but they did not know how to do good (Jer. 4:22). Woe and anguish must therefore come upon them. But, as at all times, God reserves a remnant. These people really do turn to the Lord Himself, and their hearts are true to Him. So He will not make a full end of the nation.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Cast down, but not cast off

Zion did fall. Yet how far she fell settles whether God was finished with her:

Notice that the beauty of Israel is "cast down from heaven to earth," not down to hell, the place of the dead. That was the sentence on Capernaum (Matthew 11:23). There the Lord Jesus had done many mighty works, and there He and His words were utterly rejected. So Capernaum, lifted to heaven, would be brought down to hell. Its day was over forever. Jerusalem's was not. Cast down to earth, it is treated like a city of the nations and trampled by the Gentiles. Yet it is still destined to hold a place of glory such as it never knew in the past. It must be disciplined by hardship, but God has not forsaken it forever.

Modernised from Henry Allan IronsideOriginal wording

Summary

- Lovely — Zion looks like a beautiful, delicate woman. She cannot defend her neighbours, let alone herself.

- Named — "Daughter of Zion" is poetry for the people of Jerusalem, not a coded word for the church.

- Doomed — God raises up Nebuchadnezzar, the destroyer from the north, against a nation where rich and poor sin alike.

- Spared — He will not destroy them entirely. God keeps a remnant whose hearts are true to Him.

- Restored — the beauty of Israel fell to earth, not to hell. Hardship disciplines her, but a glory she has never known still waits for her.

Jeremiah 6:3 · Darby

Shepherds with their flocks shall come unto her; they shall pitch [their] tents against her round about; they shall feed every one in his place.

Jeremiah 6 opens with an alarm. The invaders come as shepherds: they camp around the city with their flocks and graze it bare, each taking his own share. The language sounds peaceful, but it describes a siege — so why would God call such visitors to His own city?

Besiegers Under Orders

Notice who issues the invitation to this siege.

The prophet orders the besiegers to come against Jerusalem, and the reason is covetousness and deceit everywhere. Those who destroy her would be so eager that neither the heat of noon nor the darkness of night would hold them back. Those trapped inside would be left deeply discouraged.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Word "Shepherd"

The word translated "shepherds" is the ordinary word for feeding a flock. Jeremiah also uses it for Israel's own leaders, and his verdict on them is blunt.

The pastors, like the prophets and the priests, were sunk in sin. The word for pastor is "raab," meaning "to feed." This word is only translated "pastor" in Jeremiah; it is usually translated "shepherd." It is a very general term. It seems to cover all those who care for and feed the flock of God.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The Destroyer from the North

The identity of these shepherds is not left open. Commentators point to one historic invasion.

There was no man to save the sorrowful situation. Therefore the instrument of God's anger is raised up! The event to which the book points is about to take place! Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sounds! Evil comes, and a great destruction!

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

A Rod That Does Not Know Whose Hand Holds It

If God calls the invaders, does that make them innocent?

God put power into the hand of the Gentile. He granted success to his armies, even against the nation of His choice, and to the overthrow of Zion that He loved. Even so, He does not overlook the pride of heart, the lust of power, the self-will and violence of the rod that He uses to correct His erring people. The nations that invaded His land again and again, and destroyed life and property without restraint, were His instruments for correcting His obstinate and stubborn people. But doing the will of God was far from the thought of any one of them. God takes into account not only what men do, but their reason for doing it.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Correction Refused

Kelly traces the siege to covetousness and deceit. Other writers group this verse with passages that expose a deeper problem: a people who would not be corrected.

Look at scriptures such as Jeremiah 2:30; 6:3; 7:28; and Zephaniah 3:2. They show that a similar spirit prevailed among the people in Jerusalem just before Nebuchadnezzar destroyed it. Those who refuse "correction" are claiming by that refusal to be all they should be. In Malachi's day the people were refusing all correction. The same thing meets us in Revelation 3, where the church at Laodicea is so rich that it has need of nothing, and therefore no need of correction. So again we have to remind ourselves of our danger in this direction.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

A Way of Escape

The chapter that announces the siege also tells people how to get out.

The children of Benjamin are urged to flee for safety because of the evil coming from the north. There were probably God-fearing men among the Benjamites. Those who heeded the call fled and escaped. A warning message follows: "Be warned, O Jerusalem, lest I turn from you in disgust, lest I make you a desolation, an uninhabited land." But they paid no attention to it.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Called — the besiegers do not just arrive. The prophet summons them, and the cause is covetousness and deceit running through the whole population.

- Named — the shepherds pitching their tents are the army of Nebuchadnezzar. He is the destroyer from the north, raised up as God's instrument of anger.

- Used — God can hand power to an invader and still judge his pride. Doing God's will was never that invader's aim.

- Refused — Jerusalem would not accept correction. To refuse correction is to claim there is nothing to correct.

- Escaped — the warning came before the tents went up. Those who acted on it got out alive. The city that ignored it did not.

Jeremiah 6:4 · Darby

Prepare war against her. Arise, and let us go up at noon. Woe unto us! for the day hath declined, for the shadows of the evening are lengthening.

In this verse an army shouts orders to itself: attack Jerusalem at noon, and press on as the light fades. The hard question is who put those orders into their mouths, and why the city had no defence.

The army from the north

One invader stands behind the whole section from chapter 4 onward. This is not random violence:

From Jeremiah 4:3 to the end of Jeremiah 6 the prophet Jeremiah deals with the state of Israel. Chaos once overtook the far-off creation of Genesis 1:1. In the same way, ignorance of God and injustice were bringing chaos upon the nation. There was no man to save the sorrowful situation. Therefore God raises up the instrument of His anger! The event the book points to is about to happen! Nebuchadnezzar—the lion of Babylon—the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle flag is raised! The trumpet sounds!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The same reading runs through the chapter as a whole, where the threat is named openly rather than hinted at:

Jeremiah 6 continues the testimony, but gives also the position of Jeremiah in the middle of all this evil. In verses 11-26 the judgment is plainly announced. The conduct of the false prophets is again marked. In both these chapters the coming of Nebuchadnezzar in judgment is clearly declared.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The prophet gives the order to attack

The startling thing about this verse is who is speaking. God's prophet is the one who calls the attackers forward:

First, the call to the Benjamites to leave the doomed city. Zion was only a lovely and delicate woman, unable to defend her neighbours. Next, the prophet commissions the besieging army to come against Jerusalem. The reason is greed and deceit everywhere. Her destroyers would be so eager that neither the heat of noon nor the darkness of night would delay them. Those under siege were deeply discouraged.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the city could not be saved

The cause is moral, not military. The people would not listen, and their teachers promised peace:

They did not hear because they had uncircumcised ears, and they took no delight in the Word of the Lord. How true this is today of the great mass of professing Christians! The Lord will now no longer hold back His fury; He will pour it out upon them. Covetousness, the love of money, as it is in our day, was the controlling passion. Prophet and priest dealt falsely; their one message, like the one message of prophet and priest today, was peace, peace, when there was no peace.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

God still set a good way before them. They refused to walk in it:

The prophet works hard to wake them up to the old paths, the good way, where they would find rest for their souls. But they said, "We will not walk in it." When the blessed Lord was here on earth, He kindly invited them to come to Him, and they would find rest for their souls. But man will not take that way. He chooses other ways, so he finds no real rest.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

An open door before the blow falls

Before this attack order came a shout in the other direction: get out while there is time. Some people acted on it:

The children of Benjamin are urged to flee for safety because of the evil from the north. There were probably God-fearing men among the Benjamites. Those who heeded the call fled and escaped. A warning message follows … But they did not heed it.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Lengthening shadows

The invaders' complaint about fading daylight speaks to believers today:

There is a very definite feeling among the people of God that the day of grace is about to close. In the words of the prophet we may say, "the day declines, the shadows of evening lengthen." For the Christian, we may add, in the words of the Apostle, "The night is far gone; the day is at hand."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Alarm — the trumpet sounds before the sword falls. The call to flee came first, and those who acted on it escaped.

- Commission — the attackers do not just arrive. The prophet orders them forward, and God raises the invader as the instrument of His anger.

- Cause — greed and deceit had spread through everyone, and prophet and priest cried peace where there was none.

- Eagerness — neither noon heat nor night darkness slows the destroyers, and the defenders lose heart as they watch.

- Urgency — the enemy's words about fading daylight fit a day of grace now closing. The good way still stands open; the question is whether we walk in it.

Jeremiah 6:5 · Darby

Arise, and let us go up by night, and let us destroy her palaces.

In Jeremiah 6 we overhear an army camped outside Jerusalem. Here its soldiers agree that darkness will not stop them — and God is the one reporting their plan, as the answer to His own people's refusal to listen.

The enemy's war council

One writer traces the chapter's sequence, and explains why the attackers will not wait for morning:

This closing part of the charge adds to the terror of the scene. First, there is the call to the Benjamites to leave the doomed city. Zion was only a lovely and delicate woman, unable to defend her neighbours. Next, the prophet orders the besiegers to come against Jerusalem, because of widespread greed and deceit. Those who ruined her would be so eager that neither the heat of noon nor the darkness of night would hold them back. This deeply discouraged those under siege.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Zion, in his picture, is only a delicate woman with no strength to hold such attackers off.

The hand behind the army

The soldiers say "let us attack," but they are not the first cause. One writer names the power that raised them up:

From Jeremiah 4:3 to the end of Jeremiah 6 the prophet deals with the state of Israel. Like the chaos that overtook the distant creation of Genesis 1:1, ignorance of God and injustice were bringing the same thing on the nation. There was no man to save the sorrowful situation! So the instrument of God's anger is raised up! The event the book points to is going to happen. Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon, the destroyer from the north — is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sound is heard! Evil comes, and a great destruction!

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Why the city had nothing left to defend

Judah still had its religious machinery running while the army massed outside. That was precisely the problem:

Jeremiah calls on the nations to hear his message: "Hear, O earth: behold, I am bringing disaster upon this people, the fruit of their devices, because they have not paid attention to my words; and as for my law, they have rejected it." Their ceremonies were empty hopes for holding back the judgment.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A warning designed to let people escape

A siege announced in advance is a siege you can walk away from. The opening call of the chapter was mercy dressed as an alarm, and some acted on it:

The children of Benjamin are urged to flee for safety because of the evil coming from the north. There were probably God-fearing men among the Benjamites. Those who paid attention to the call fled and escaped.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The comfortable answer that ruined them

The nation ignored the alarm. It preferred to be told that nothing was coming. One writer traces the same habit down to today:

In Jeremiah 6 we find the same state: "Everyone is greedy for unjust gain" (v. 13). As in 1 Thessalonians 5:3, just before Christ comes, so here they say, "Peace, peace" (Jer. 6:14). The prophet earnestly seeks to wake them up about the ancient paths, the good way, where they would "find rest for your souls; but they said, 'We will not walk in it'" (v. 16). When the blessed Lord was here on earth, He graciously invited them to come to Him and find rest for their souls; but man will not take that way. He chooses other ways, and so he finds no real rest.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The night attack of verse 5 is not random cruelty. It is what comes when a city hears the warning and decides not to act on it.

Summary

- Cause. The siege came because the people "have not paid attention to my words." Their ceremonies were empty hopes for holding back the judgment.

- Warning. Before the attackers spoke, God spoke. He called the people to flee, and those who heeded the call escaped.

- Instrument. The army chanting "let us attack" was the instrument of God's anger — Nebuchadnezzar, the destroyer from the north.

- Assault. They were so eager that neither noon's heat nor night's darkness would delay them. Zion had no strength of her own to hold them off.

- Refusal. Offered the ancient paths and rest for their souls, they answered, "We will not walk in it." Man still chooses other ways, and so finds no real rest.

Jeremiah 6:6 · Darby

For thus hath Jehovah of hosts said Hew ye down trees, and cast a mound against Jerusalem. She is the city to be visited; she is wholly oppression in the midst of her.

Here God Himself gives the order to besiege Jerusalem, and He names the reason: what is inside her walls. So why does the Lord call an army against His own city, and what charge makes that punishment certain?

The Command Comes From God

One commentator traces the order of events in this chapter and the reason given for the siege:

This closing part of the charge adds to the terrors of the scene. First comes the call to the Benjamites to leave the doomed city. Zion was only a lovely and delicate woman, unable to defend her neighbours. Next, the prophet orders the besiegers to come against Jerusalem. The reason is the covetousness and deceit found everywhere. Her destroyers would be so eager that neither the heat of noon nor the darkness of night would slow them down. This left those shut inside in deep discouragement.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who the Besieger Is

Jeremiah does not leave the attacking army vague. He has been pointing to one power since chapter 4:

From Jeremiah 4:3 to the end of Jeremiah 6 the prophet deals with the state of Israel. Long ago, chaos overtook the creation of Genesis 1:1. Now ignorance of God and injustice were bringing the same chaos on the nation. There was no man to save the sad situation! Therefore the instrument of God's anger is raised up! The event the book points to is about to happen! Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

An Instrument That Does Not Know It

So how much does God own of what such an army does? One writer holds both sides together: God uses the nations, and they still answer for their own pride:

God put power into the hand of the Gentile. He gave success to his armies, even against the nation of His choice, and to the overthrow of the Zion He loved. Even so, He does not overlook the pride of heart, the lust of power, the self-will and violence of the rod He uses to correct His erring people. The nations invaded His land again and again, and destroyed life and property without cause. They were His instruments for correcting His obstinate and stubborn people. But doing the will of God was far from the thought of any one of them.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

Oppression Inside Makes Judgment Certain

God names Jerusalem the city that must be punished, because oppression fills her. Scripture brings the same charge against her elsewhere. One writer explains why God's own city gets the sharper word:

"Woe to her who is rebellious and defiled, the oppressing city!" This is not Nineveh, but Jerusalem. The most solemn word of God is always kept for His own people, city, and sanctuary. Judgment must begin at His house: the sentence may end with His house, but judgment begins there… Once people give in to shameless evil, it always marks the fall of those who once had better light and gave it up.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Door Still Left Open

The order to besiege is not the last word of the paragraph. Verse 1 told Benjamin to run, and verse 8 pleads with the city itself. Some did listen:

The children of Benjamin are urged to flee for safety because of the evil from the north. There were probably God-fearing men among the Benjamites. Those who heeded the call fled and escaped. Then comes a warning message: "Be warned, O Jerusalem, lest I turn from you in disgust, lest I make you a desolation, an uninhabited land." But they paid no attention.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. God orders the siege because of what is inside the walls: covetousness, deceit, and oppression. The enemy's strength is not the reason.

- Command. The armies do not decide to come; the prophet commissions them. The order to build the ramp and cut the timber is God's own.

- Instrument. God raises up Nebuchadnezzar, the destroyer from the north, as the tool of His anger. The destroyer still answers for his own pride and violence.

- Severity. God keeps His most solemn word for His own city. Privilege did not soften the sentence; it sharpened it.

- Escape. The same message that summons the besiegers tells the people to flee and be warned. Those who listened got out; the city did not listen.

Jeremiah 6:7 · Darby

As a well poureth forth her waters, so she poureth forth her wickedness violence and destruction are heard in her; before me continually are grief and wounds.

Jerusalem is under a siege order in this chapter, and verse 7 gives the reason. Her evil is not an occasional lapse. It keeps flowing, like water in a well that never runs dry. That picture raises two questions. Where does such a steady supply of evil come from? And what does God mean when He says the sickness and wounds are always in His sight?

The siege already commissioned

The verse sits inside a scene of gathering armies. One writer sets out that scene and names what brought the attackers.

This closing part of the charge adds to the terrors of the scene. First comes the call to the Benjamites to leave the doomed city. Zion was only a lovely and delicate woman, unable to defend her neighbours. Next, the prophet sends the besiegers against Jerusalem, and this because covetousness and deceit were everywhere. Her destroyers would be so eager that neither the heat of noon nor the dark of night would hold them back.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The word behind "fountain"

The Hebrew word here is not the usual term for a spring. It means a dug pit or well. The ESV says "well"; older versions render it "fountain" in this verse alone.

bor, "pit, well": translated "fountain" only in Jeremiah 6:7.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the picture is a dug well that keeps its water fresh. Jerusalem kept her wickedness the same way — stored up and always ready.

Corrupted springs mean certain judgment

The verse points to a source, not just to separate acts. One writer draws out what that meant for Judah.

So every spring of moral uprightness was corrupted. As a result it was plain that nothing but judgment could come to them from the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Jerusalem's problem was not a list of bad deeds. The source itself was poisoned, so nothing clean could come out of it.

Violence and destruction heard in her

The second half of the verse moves from the source to the noise in the streets. One writer explains what a large city does with the evil in the people who fill it.

Huge crowds of people, such as a city gathers, are bound to be sinks of evil, since man is a creature in revolt. The good and noble things men's cities hold are completely overshadowed by the appalling evil that gives the whole place its character. All the streams of human evil meet in one foul pool in the city man designs, and the larger the city, the fouler the pool.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Always before Me

God does not say that reports of the violence reach Him. He says it is never out of His sight. And what grieves Him most is not simply that evil exists. It is where this evil is happening.

The saddest thing for the heart of God is not that the world is wicked, but that the city which bears His name, on which His eyes rest continually, should be so evil.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Jerusalem had an answer of her own for those wounds. It never touched the real damage.

Jerusalem would not be instructed. To them the word of the Lord is a reproach. Wounds were healed only on the surface, with a "Peace, peace," where there was no peace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why reform could not reach it

If the trouble is the well itself, cleaning the water drawn from it is wasted work. One writer applies this to every heart, not only to Jerusalem's.

What is needed is a new fountain of life within — what the Lord offered to the sinner at the well of Sychar. The old fountain is corrupt, its waters polluted and foul. Filtering is worthless, for there is nothing there but what is poisonous and deadly.

Modernised from James BoydOriginal wording

The same condition, the same remedy

Covetousness and violence are not unique to Jeremiah's Jerusalem. One writer names where they lead and the only way out.

Covetousness — loving self, money and pleasure — along with violence and hatred, mark the close of this period. The Lord will bring judgment upon it all. The way of deliverance, however, is always the same; it is found in Christ alone.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Source. The word behind "well" here means a dug pit. Jerusalem kept her wickedness fresh the way a well keeps its water.

- Supply. Every spring of moral uprightness was corrupted, so only judgment could follow. A poisoned source gives no clean water.

- Overflow. What the well holds, the streets hear. All the streams of human evil meet in one pool, and the larger the city, the fouler the pool.

- Sight. God's deepest grief is not that the world is wicked. It is that the city bearing His name, always under His eye, is so evil — while her wounds are patched over with talk of peace.

- Cure. Filtering a corrupt well is worthless. The heart needs a new fountain of life within, and Christ alone gives it.

Jeremiah 6:8 · Darby

Be thou instructed, Jerusalem, lest my soul be alienated from thee; lest I make thee a desolation, a land not inhabited.

Jeremiah 6 opens with an alarm: the enemy is at the gates, and Benjamin's people must flee. Then God turns and speaks to the city itself — one last warning before the ruin He describes arrives.

An alarm before the army

The chapter opens with an escape order. Some inside the doomed area got out alive.

The children of Benjamin are urged to flee to safety because of the evil coming from the north. There were probably God-fearing men among the Benjamites. Those who heeded the call fled and escaped.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Warning is itself mercy

The word "lest" comes twice: the ruin was not yet fixed. One writer finds the same order all through Scripture.

Every reader of the Scriptures must have noticed that there is always, so to speak, a period of grace before judgment falls. It is so here. God first exposes the sorrowful moral state of His people. He warns them that He cannot go on tolerating their arrogant sin. And He gives them space for repentance.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Instruction that reaches the heart

ESV reads "Be warned," while older translations have "Be instructed." Either way, God is not asking for more religion. He is after something under the surface of a religious life.

The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the Lord", the circumcision which touches the heart, preparing it for Him. With pleadings and warnings he works to reach them. It is the same today. Unless the message has reached the heart, the spirit, the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. That is so even when, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The answer Jerusalem gave

Jerusalem's answer was no. Two things stood in the way: soothing voices promising peace, and an old path the people would not walk.

No: Jerusalem would not be instructed. The word of Jehovah is to them a reproach. Their wounds got a shallow cure: "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They would not go the good old way, and they would not listen to the warning of new troubles. The Lord makes Jeremiah a fortress, but the people are no better than worthless silver, rejected by Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One dictionary explains the picture: God's people, in their moral decay, are compared to rejected silver — silver turned to dross (Morrish Bible Dictionary).

When God withdraws

The heaviest threat here is not the army. It is God turning away from the city Himself — older translations speak of His soul being alienated from Jerusalem. One writer describes how slowly that departure begins.

The glory is departing, its first step to go is made. It is on the threshold, an "Ichabod" in the making. God cannot dwell where His character is compromised and His glory is given to another. His honour will not dwell where He is dishonoured. Yet it is as if God is reluctant to leave, even if there is so much that dishonours Him there. How He longs for His people to be in right relation with Himself and to enjoy fellowship. "How can I give you up? … my compassion grows warm and tender."

Modernised from Edwin N. CrossOriginal wording

"Ichabod" is a name that means "the glory has gone."

Summary

- Warning. God sounded the alarm before He struck, and told people where to run. Commentators see a fixed pattern: a period of grace always comes before judgment.

- Space. The double "lest" means the ruin was not yet fixed. God exposes the condition, then gives room to repent.

- Heart. God's warning calls for a change at the centre — the circumcision that touches the heart. Priests, a name and a form of religion were never enough.

- Refusal. Jerusalem refused. God's word sounded like an insult, a shallow "Peace, peace" covered the wound, and the people would not take the good old way.

- Departure. The real threat was God's own withdrawal — the glory on the threshold, an "Ichabod" in the making. Even then He is slow to go, still asking, "How can I give you up?"

Jeremiah 6:9 · Darby

Thus saith Jehovah of hosts They shall thoroughly glean like a vine the remnant of Israel turn back thy hand, as a grape-gatherer unto the baskets.

Jeremiah 6 closes a long charge against Jerusalem. Here the Lord of hosts does not speak to His people. He gives orders over their heads to the men who will strip them like a vine. Two questions follow. Who does the gleaning, and what is left after the hand goes over the branches a second time?

A command spoken to the besiegers

In this chapter the Lord does not only predict an attack. He orders one, and He gives the reason for it.

This closing part of the charge adds to the terror of the scene. First comes the call to the people of Benjamin to leave the doomed city… Next, the prophet commissions the besiegers to come against Jerusalem. The reason is greed and deceit everywhere. Those who ruin her would be so eager that neither the heat of noon nor the darkness of night would slow them… Jerusalem would not be taught. The word of the Lord is an insult to them. Their wounds were healed only on the surface with "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They would neither take the good old way, nor listen to the warning of new troubles… But if the Lord makes Jeremiah a fortress, the people are no better than rejected silver, refused by Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The gleaner is God's instrument

So who carries out the stripping? The book names the man God raises up, and the event the whole book has been moving toward.

There was no man to save the sorrowful situation. So God raises up the instrument of His anger! The event the book points to is about to happen. Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle flag goes up! The trumpet sounds! Evil comes, and a great destruction!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Why a vine is the picture

Why speak of gleaning a vine? Because God had come looking for fruit from Israel, year after year.

Through years of long-suffering patience, God had tested Israel in various ways, seeking fruit, but found only wild grapes. The last and greatest test was the presence of the beloved Son. Their deliberate rejection of the Son was the final proof that Israel really was a degenerate plant and an empty vine.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Outward reform, unchanged hearts

Jeremiah prophesied while King Josiah was pulling down the idols. The nation looked better. One writer says the change never reached the heart.

In these end-time revivals a powerful effect falls on everyone. But the reality is found only in the hearts of the remnant. The book of Jeremiah, who prophesied under Josiah, shows us that the moral state of the people did not change at all. They agreed easily to the ending of idol worship, because the king was faithful. But their hearts stayed as far from God as ever.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

What survives the stripping

The gleaning falls on "the remnant of Israel." Judgment in these chapters comes with a limit set on it.

The people had not believed the messages of judgment. The prophet describes what the invader from the north will do to Israel… Again the promise comes: "I will not make a full end of you." The Lord keeps a remnant among His people.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Gleanings as God's provision

Gleaning has a second sense in Scripture. What the pickers leave behind is not waste. It is kept for someone.

There will be a special testimony of God at the end of the age… A remnant will be left in the field who really belong to Him. The gleanings are left, as it says here, for the poor and the stranger. The Lord will maintain His testimony even in the darkest times, and in the most unusual way.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Vine. God looked for fruit from Israel through long years of patience. He found wild grapes.

- Search. The stripping is thorough. The gatherer's hand goes back over the branches a second time, and the nation is found empty.

- Command. The gleaners are not free agents. God tells the prophet to summon the besiegers. The destroyer from the north is the instrument of His anger.

- Cause. Josiah's reform pulled down idols but left hearts unchanged. A nation that looked mended was still ripe for judgment.

- Remnant. Even at full stretch, judgment stops short of a full end. God keeps a remnant. The gleanings left behind are what He saves for the poor and the stranger.

Jeremiah 6:10 · Darby

To whom shall I speak and testify, that they may hear? Behold, their ear is uncircumcised, and they cannot hearken behold, the word of Jehovah is unto them a reproach; they have no delight in it.

Jerusalem is already under sentence, and God asks who is left to hear a warning. The answer turns on a strange phrase — an ear that has never been circumcised — and on a people who heard God's word as an insult.

A city that would not be taught

Jerusalem had a settled answer to bad news, and it was not repentance.

No: Jerusalem would not be taught. The word of the LORD is to them an object of scorn. They healed wounds on the surface with a "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They would not walk in the good old way, and they would not listen to the warning of fresh trouble.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What an uncircumcised ear means

Circumcision was an outward cutting of the flesh. Jeremiah applies that sign to the ear, and its real meaning was never on the surface.

Circumcision was only an outward cutting away of the flesh, only an outward ceremony... The spiritual meaning of circumcision was "a heart affair." In Jeremiah 6:10 the Lord complains of Israel that "their ears are uncircumcised, they cannot listen." In Jeremiah 9:26 He adds: "All the house of Israel are uncircumcised in heart."

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

The point is not that they refused a ceremony. They had kept it.

This time it is the ear — a matter of obedience to the Word of the Lord. How solemn these words are: "…they have no delight in it". It is of little value to submit to outward ordinances and yet have the ear closed to His Word. This was the case with Israel.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

When God's word becomes an offence

The problem was not a shortage of preaching. The ear itself was closed, and one writer says the same is true now.

They did not hear because they had uncircumcised ears, and they had no delight in the Word of the Lord. How true this is today of the great mass of professing Christians!... Prophet and priest were dishonest. Their one message was peace, peace, when there was no peace — and it is the one message of prophet and priest today.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Religion that never reached the heart

The prophet keeps pressing for a circumcision that reaches the heart. Israel's problem was not a lack of religion.

The prophet seeks true circumcision "to the Lord", the circumcision which touches the heart, preparing it for Him. With pleading and warning he works to reach them. It is the same today. Unless we have been reached in the heart, in the spirit, in the very centre of our being, we are alienated from the living God. That is true even though, like these Jews, we call ourselves "the people of God" and have priests and a form of religion.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The remedy Jeremiah himself supplies

If the diagnosis is a closed ear, the prophet has already prescribed the cure earlier in his own book.

And what is the remedy if we feel that such is our condition? I suppose we find the remedy in Jeremiah 4:4. "Circumcise yourselves to the LORD; remove the foreskin of your hearts." I take the call to "circumcise ourselves to the Lord" to mean cutting off the "lusts of the flesh" that so easily trap us... We dare not let our ears grow heavy, so that we fail to hear these most solemn warnings.

Modernised from G. C. WillisOriginal wording

The opposite of Jeremiah's complaint

Turn the verse around, and it shows what an open ear looks like. One writer finds that picture in Colossians.

"Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly" (Col. 3:16). The ear must be open to the Word, and obedience springs from that. When the Word dwells in the believer it is no burden to obey it. Similar words appear about the young men in 1 John 2:14... We overcome in conflict by the Word, and by listening to it... Quoting again from Jeremiah 6:10, "their ears are uncircumcised, they cannot listen". In our passage in Colossians we see the circumcised ear and the obedience that follows.

Modernised from Truth & TestimonyOriginal wording

Summary

- Ear. God's complaint is not a missing ceremony. Israel kept the outward rite, but the inner ear stayed shut.

- Heart. Circumcision was "a heart affair". Jeremiah 9:26 says the same nation was uncircumcised in heart, so the deaf ear points to a deeper problem.

- Reproach. Once the ear closes, God's word sounds like an insult instead of help, and all delight in it goes.

- Danger. A people can have priests, a form of religion, and the name "people of God", and still be alienated from the living God if He has never reached the centre of their being.

- Remedy. Jeremiah 4:4 answers Jeremiah 6:10. Cut away the desires that dull the ear. Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, and obedience is no burden.

Jeremiah 6:11 · Darby

And I am full of the fury of Jehovah, I am weary with holding in. Pour it out upon the children in the street, and upon the assembly of young men together for even the husband with the wife shall be taken; the aged with him [that is] full of days.

Jeremiah is full of God's anger and can no longer hold it in. He is told to pour it out on the whole city. Two questions follow. Why had God's patience run out? And why does the sentence fall on children, young men, married couples and the very old alike?

Where the verse stands in the chapter

This verse sits at a turning point. One writer traces the chapters around it, down to the invader God would use:

Jeremiah 5 shows the sin and iniquity to be universal: rich and poor, all are alike. And "Shall I not punish them for these things? declares the LORD." Yet He will not destroy entirely. It also points out the source of evil, or at least what keeps it going. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule by their means. Jeremiah 6 continues the testimony, but it also gives Jeremiah's position in the middle of all this evil. Verses 11-26 announce the judgment plainly. The false prophets' conduct is marked once more. Both chapters clearly declare the coming of Nebuchadnezzar in judgment.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Restraint comes to an end

Why now? One writer names what had made the people deaf:

They did not hear because they had uncircumcised ears, and they had no delight in the Word of the Lord. How true this is today of the great mass of professing Christians! The Lord will now no longer restrain His fury; He will pour it out upon them. Covetousness, the love of money, as it is in our day, was the controlling passion. Prophet and priest dealt falsely; their one message, like the one message of the prophet and priest today, was peace, peace, when there was no peace.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Guilt in every class

The verse names every age group. One writer shows how far the guilt reached:

All classes were involved in the guilt of having forgotten and forsaken Jehovah — kings and subjects, high and low, rich and poor, pastors and people, prophets and priests — all were alike fallen and guilty.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

One writer traces where that left them:

So all the springs of moral uprightness were corrupted; and so it was plain that nothing but judgment could come to them from the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the judgment left behind

One writer describes the state the people were left in when the blow fell:

Here is the dismal state, described so movingly by a heart crushed with grief. That heart could not exaggerate how low God's ancient people had sunk. Sex, age, condition, place — nothing spared, and nothing sacred. Every word carries weight; every detail is an unbearable burden. How overwhelming for the heart which rightly feels everything!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Full of fury, full of tears

The same prophet who carries God's anger grieves for the people it will strike. Later in the chapter he calls them to mourn:

At the same time, the prophet's heart is full of sorrow for the nation. "O daughter of my people, put on sackcloth, and roll in ashes; make mourning as for an only son, most bitter lamentation, for suddenly the destroyer will come upon us" (verse 26).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Anger and affection together are not a contradiction. One writer sees them as a mark of the Spirit of Christ:

There is zeal for Jehovah's glory against the evil and against the people who dishonoured Him. With it goes tender affection for them as Jehovah's people. Everywhere this is a striking mark of the working of the Spirit of Christ. Compare Moses (Ex. 32:27-31 and what follows); so Paul (Rom. 9; 1 Thess. 2:15-16): only here, under grace, there is no call for judgment; so even Christ Himself (compare Matt. 23:31-37).

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A note on the wording

Writers on the Hebrew text point to this verse as a known example of a copying question:

Sometimes copyists misunderstood an abbreviation. One such mark could mean either "Jehovah" or "my." Most handbooks of textual criticism point to Jeremiah 6:11 as an illustration of this: compare the Hebrew and the Greek Old Testament.

Modernised from Outlines of Old Testament StudyOriginal wording

Summary

- Restraint — God had held His anger back; here He no longer restrains it. Even so, one writer notes, He will not destroy the nation entirely.

- Reason — every rank had failed alike: kings and subjects, prophets and priests, rich and poor. Corruption reached the springs of moral uprightness, so only judgment could follow.

- Reach — guilt in every class, judgment on every age: children in the street, young men, married couples, the aged. Nothing spared, nothing sacred.

- Result — the announcement became fact. A heart crushed with grief later described a people brought so low that every detail was an unbearable burden.

- Right spirit — the man carrying the fury also calls for sackcloth and mourning. Zeal for God's honour joined to tenderness for the guilty is the mark writers point to as the Spirit of Christ.

Jeremiah 6:12 · Darby

And their houses shall be turned unto others, [their] fields and wives together; for I will stretch out my hand upon the inhabitants of the land, saith Jehovah.

Jeremiah 6 closes a long charge against Jerusalem, and here the loss is named in plain household terms. Two questions press: why the sentence falls on homes and families, and whose hand is behind the invasion.

A sentence already decided

This part of the chapter has stopped warning. It states what will happen, and names the power God will use.

Jeremiah 6 continues the testimony, but also gives Jeremiah's own position in the middle of all this evil. In verses 11-26 the judgment is plainly announced. The conduct of the false prophets is again marked. In both these chapters the coming of Nebuchadnezzar in judgment is clearly declared.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why houses and fields

The loss matches the sin. Greed is why the besiegers come, and the prophet is the one who summons them.

This closing part of the charge adds to the terrors of the scene… The prophet commissions the besiegers to come against Jerusalem, and he does so because of universal covetousness and deceit. Her destroyers would be so eager that neither the heat of noon nor the darkness of night would delay them. That deeply discouraged those under siege.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same greed gripped the men whose job was to warn. That failure has a modern echo.

They did not hear because they had uncircumcised ears, and they took no delight in the Word of the Lord. How true this is today of the great mass of professing Christians! The Lord will now no longer restrain His fury; He will pour it out on them. Covetousness, the love of money, as it is in our day, was the controlling passion. Prophet and priest dealt falsely; their one message, like the one message of prophet and priest today, was peace, peace, when there was no peace.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What "turned over to others" meant

Jeremiah lived to see this sentence carried out. In Lamentations he prays it back to God as a finished fact. The loss ran deeper than property. The land had never been theirs by conquest alone.

So the prophet says, "Remember, O LORD, what has befallen us; look, and see our disgrace! Our inheritance has been turned over to strangers, our homes to foreigners." This was not merely a human or natural feeling about their loss and disgrace. We must keep in mind that Israel held the land of their possession from Jehovah. No doubt they drove out or subdued the Canaanites. As men reckon it, they held it by right of conquest. But a deeper fact lay underneath the victories of Joshua. God gave them strength to put down the most corrupt race then on earth, who had pushed into a land that He had from the first intended and given by promise to the fathers… Sadly, they did not take the blessing as promises received by faith on the ground of God's grace. They took it on the condition of their own faithfulness to the law — a condition that must be fatal to a sinner. So came the disasters, and finally the ruin, which Jeremiah here groans out to God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Whose hand it really was

The hand stretched out is God's, not Babylon's. That one fact keeps the disaster from being meaningless. It also shows the sentence was no sudden decision.

But the prophet insists that Jehovah Himself had done the work of destruction, and He did it because of His people's sin. The nations might boast of their power over Jerusalem, but the deed was His… It is sorrowful, most sorrowful, that His hand had done it all. Yet it is a comfort to faith, for it is the hand that can and will build up again for His name's sake. Nor was this a hasty chastening. From the earliest days Jehovah had threatened and foretold through Moses what Jeremiah sets out in detail in his Lamentations. Compare Leviticus 26; Deuteronomy 28, 31, 32.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The offer they refused

Alongside the sentence stood an open road back. The people were called to it, and they said no.

The prophet works hard to wake them up about the old paths, the good way, where they would "find rest for their souls; but they said, We will not walk in it" (v. 16). When the blessed Lord was here on earth, He invited them to come to Him and find rest for their souls. But man will not take that way. He chooses other ways, and so he finds no real rest.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Covetousness and deceit brought the besiegers to Jerusalem's walls. The love of money was the controlling passion of prophet, priest and people alike.

- Cover-up. Prophet and priest kept saying "peace, peace" when there was no peace. That message let the greed run on unchecked.

- Consequence. What they coveted, they lost. Homes, fields and families passed to strangers, just as Lamentations later records.

- Control. The invader was only the instrument. The hand stretched out was Jehovah's own, and Moses had announced it long before Jeremiah.

- Comfort. That same hand can build up again for His name's sake. The good way was still open; they refused to walk in it.

Jeremiah 6:13 · Darby

For from the least of them even unto the greatest of them, every one is given to covetousness; and from the prophet even unto the priest, every one dealeth falsely.

An army from the north is closing in on Jerusalem, and this verse gives God's reason for it. Greed had spread through every level of society, and the prophets and priests were lying along with everyone else.

Why the besiegers come

This is not a general complaint about a bad age. Greed and deceit are the stated reason the besieging army is ordered in.

The prophet orders the besieging army to come against Jerusalem, and the reason is greed and deceit in everyone. Those who came to lay her waste would be so eager that neither the heat of noon nor the darkness of night would hold them back. Those under siege were left deeply discouraged.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From the least to the greatest

God had pleaded with this people for chapters before this warning. Now the verse runs from the bottom of society to the top, and no class can point at another as the guilty one.

Jeremiah 1 to 24 is full of the gracious pleadings of Jehovah with His rebellious, backsliding, guilty, but beloved people. Judah's moral state at the time of this prophecy was dreadful. Every class shared the guilt of having forgotten and forsaken Jehovah: kings and subjects, high and low, rich and poor, pastors and people, prophets and priests. All alike had fallen, and all alike were guilty.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

What the greed was reaching for

One writer compares Israel's greed with the greed of Christians today, and finds the modern version worse.

Remember that this greed in Israel was not nearly as bad in character as it is among us. What they wanted was only more than their fair share of what God had given to them all. Their blessings were earthly, and no one could blame them for valuing money and property highly. The Christian's possessions are spiritual, yet you rarely see Christians fighting for more than their share of those. What Christians want is too often the world and the things in it. They should not set their heart or affections on such things at all, still less envy those who have more. What a tale of spiritual deadness it tells when a child of God, an heir of glory, covets the poor riches of earth!

Modernised from A. T. SchofieldOriginal wording

Prophet and priest dealing falsely

The second half of the verse names the people who should have been the exception.

Greed, the love of money, was the controlling passion, just as it is in our day. Prophet and priest dealt falsely. Their one message was the same one that prophet and priest give today: peace, peace, when there was no peace.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The same failure runs on long after Judah, and gain is still the motive.

It is in Jeremiah's writings that we see most fully the prophets prophesying falsely and the priests going along with the evil so as to rule. The true prophet cries out in his anguish that God's people love to have it so — and what will they do in the end? God's vengeance on the false teachers is more terrible still. Their greed and their smooth words have drawn the crowd away from the truth all along. They cheer man's progress in his own way without Christ. How little they believe that God's eye is on their selfish trade!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The one way out

This is not only an ancient problem, and the answer to it has never changed.

Greed — loving self, money and pleasure — marks the close of this period, along with violence and hatred. The Lord will bring judgment on it all. But the way of deliverance is always the same: it is found in Christ alone. We find the same state in Jeremiah 6.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Greed spreads. From the least to the greatest, every class was fallen and guilty — kings and subjects, rich and poor, people and priests.

- Greed lies. Where money is the controlling passion, prophet and priest deal falsely. Their message becomes peace, peace, where there is no peace.

- Greed invites the army. Kelly names greed and deceit as the ground for sending the besieging army against the city.

- Greed is worse now. Judah wanted more of the earthly things God had given them. When a Christian craves the poor riches of earth, it shows spiritual deadness.

- Greed has one cure. The same greed marks the close of this age. Deliverance never changes: Christ alone.

Jeremiah 6:14 · Darby

And they have healed the breach of the daughter of my people lightly, saying, Peace, peace! when there is no peace.

Jeremiah is warning a city under judgment. The men in charge of its spiritual care are treating a deadly wound as if it were a scratch. The verse raises a question that outlives Jerusalem. What happens when the voices we trust tell us we are safe, and they have never looked at our real condition?

The Setting of the Cry

The words fall inside a chapter of siege warnings. One survey of the chapter places the false comfort exactly where it belongs — between the alarm and the refusal to listen:

Jerusalem would not be instructed. The word of the Lord is to them a reproach. Wounds were slightly healed with a "Peace, peace," where there was none. They would neither go the good old way, nor attend to the warning of new woes.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Who Was Saying It

Who was saying it? The prophets and priests — the very men who should have warned the people. The same failure appears earlier in the book, and the people were not its victims. They wanted it:

The worst part of the national evil was this: not just some of the people were guilty. "An appalling and horrible thing has happened in the land," he says. "The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction; My people love to have it so, but what will you do when the end comes?"

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Healing a Wound Lightly

To heal a wound lightly is to cover a deep injury instead of treating it. One writer, commenting on the same words in chapter 8, explains the method and why God will not work that way:

The prophet brings this great fact home to them. There is a wound there. And in that day there were religious quacks with their cures who tried to heal that wound lightly. How? By giving a message that did not match the real state. If God comes and deals with us, He must have reality... The cry of "Peace, peace" was propping up a rotten state of things. God is too faithful, too holy and too gracious to do anything less than meet the condition of things exactly as it really is before Him.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Why There Was No Peace to Announce

Notice that purity comes first on the list, before peace. If we think about it, we will see at once that it must be so, since all is of God. He never compromises with evil, so there can be no peace except in purity. Again and again this was the burden of the prophets.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Two Voices Still Preaching Peace

Commentators apply the verse well beyond Judah. The same message is still on offer, and one writer names its two sources:

Two preachers of peace are seeking to gain the attention of the children of men... These preachers are Satan and Christ... The one group proclaims a false peace. It rests on rotten foundations, and sooner or later there must come an awful awakening from it. The other group proclaims a true peace, founded on the unchangeable basis of the Saviour's atoning blood.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The counterfeit is convincing because it feels like calm. One writer traces that feeling to its real cause:

This is the devil's peace; he rocks men in the cradle of security; he cries Peace, peace, when men are on the edge of hell. The peace a sinner seems to have does not come from knowing that he is happy; it comes from not knowing his danger... True peace is after trouble. God convinces and humbles the soul; then He speaks peace.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

When a False Peace Is Broken

Losing a comfortable lie hurts. One writer calls the loss a mercy:

It is a mercy from God when a false peace is smashed up. The "great bitterness" that follows is not pleasant, but it is still the way to God. See Saul of Tarsus in Acts 9:9, three whole days unable to eat or drink... Saul had made a terrible discovery. For all his blameless life and religious zeal, at heart he was an enemy of God and His Son.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Peace That Is Not a Slogan

The remedy is not a better announcement but a finished work:

So it is absurd to tell a man to make his peace with God. It cannot be done. No one can get rid of a single sin by himself. But in truth there is no peace to make. Christ has "made peace by the blood of His cross" (Colossians 1:20). He now proclaims that peace to everyone in the gospel, by the Holy Spirit sent down from heaven.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Same Cry Before the End

One writer links this cry to the last days, and to the call that comes two verses later:

As in 1 Thessalonians 5:3, just before Christ comes, so here, they say, "Peace, peace" (Jeremiah 6:14). The prophet works hard to wake them to the old paths, the good way, where they would find rest for their souls. "But they said, 'We will not walk in it'" (v. 16).

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Wound. The hurt was real and deep. They did not misread the wound; they covered it over instead of healing it.

- Whitewash. The false peace came from the very prophets and priests who should have warned, and the people loved to have it so.

- Why. No announcement could make it true. God never compromises with evil, so there is no peace without purity.

- Waking. A broken false peace is a mercy, not a cruelty; true peace comes after trouble, not instead of it.

- Work. There is no peace to make — Christ made it by the blood of His cross, and that is the only peace anyone can truly announce.

Jeremiah 6:15 · Darby

Are they ashamed that they have committed abomination? Nay, they are not at all ashamed, neither know they what it is to blush. Therefore they shall fall among them that fall; at the time that I visit them they shall stumble, saith Jehovah.

They could still hear God's question, but they could no longer feel it. Judah had sinned until sin no longer registered. Jeremiah points to that lost blush as the reason judgment had to fall.

The false comfort behind the hardened face

Judah's religious leaders helped make her shameless. They treated deep wounds as if they were scratches.

Jerusalem would not take instruction. The word of the Lord is an insult to them. They healed wounds only on the surface, crying, "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They would not walk in the good old way, and they would not listen to the warning of new troubles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

One writer finds the same false message among religious leaders in his own day.

Covetousness, the love of money, as it is in our day, was the controlling passion. Prophet and priest dealt falsely; their one message, like the one message of the prophet and priest today, was peace, peace, when there was no peace.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What it means that they could not blush

The inability to blush is not a small failing of manners. Scripture uses the forehead to show what a person has become inside. Here the contrast is a bride who can still blush.

Scripture uses the forehead to express either modesty or boldness. The prophet had to say of Israel, "You are obstinate … and your forehead brass" (Isaiah 48:4). The Lord asks, "Were they ashamed when they committed abomination?" The answer comes: "No, they were not at all ashamed; they did not know how to blush" (Jeremiah 6:15; Jeremiah 8:12). In contrast, the bride shows modesty. She can blush.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Numbness after sin is worse than the sin

The verse does not ask whether they had sinned. It asks whether they were ashamed. What God exposes is the state that comes after the act.

Man has sinned against God, abused His goodness, and refused His Son. Still he turns to please himself as if nothing had happened. To a spiritual eye it is more terrible to see a man feel nothing after he has sinned. That is a far deeper shade of sin than the crime itself. A soul returns to God exactly by being awakened to how awful this state is.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Shame is not dead — only buried

A lost blush does not mean shame has died out of human nature.

Shame is sin's firstborn. Later sins often push it aside (Jeremiah 6:15), and it stays buried while our nature runs on in its darkness. But it returns to its first place whenever light breaks in on the soul. So the first effect of truth, when it gives new life, is to fill the awakened sinner with a deep sense of his own unfitness for the presence of his Maker.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

Why judgment had to come

"They shall fall among those who fall" is the sentence on a people who took every warning without flinching. God had already struck them, and it changed nothing.

Isaiah says, "Why will you still be struck down? Why will you continue to rebel?" Jeremiah had to say of the generation in his day, "You have struck them down, but they felt no anguish." He said again, "I have paid attention and listened, but they have not spoken rightly; no man relents of his evil, saying, 'What have I done?'" Are we then to wonder that the sword of the Chaldean entered the land?

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Greed, lies, and false prophets ran right through the chapter.

Corruption had reached every spring of moral uprightness. So it was plain that nothing but judgment could come to them from the Lord.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — false peace. Leaders healed wounds only on the surface, crying peace where there was none. Comfort without truth hardens a people.

- Symptom — the lost blush. The forehead shows modesty or boldness. A face that cannot redden has stopped registering what God calls abomination.

- Depth — numbness beats the act. Carrying on as if nothing had happened is a darker shade of sin than the sin itself.

- Hope — shame is only buried. Shame is sin's firstborn. Later sins crowd it out, but it returns the moment God's light breaks into the soul.

- End — the reckoning. God had struck them and no one asked, "What have I done?" — so the fall came at the time He appointed.

Jeremiah 6:16 · Darby

Thus saith Jehovah Stand in the ways and see, and ask for the ancient paths, which is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk [therein].

God speaks to a nation close to ruin. His remedy is not a new plan. He tells them to stop at the crossroads: look, ask, and take the road that was always good. The sting is in the last line. They refused, and they refused on purpose.

The Crossroads and the Siege

The invitation comes to a city already told what is coming. Its teachers had covered the wound with the word "peace." The same hardness that ignored the warning also refused the road back.

Jerusalem would not be instructed. The word of the Lord is a reproach to them. Wounds were slightly healed with a "Peace, peace," where there was none. They would neither go the good old way, nor pay attention to the warning of new troubles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the Ancient Paths Are

Older translations call these the "old paths." Many read the phrase as outward arrangements. One writer traces it back to the start of the book, where God recalls the love of Israel's early days with Him.

What then are the ancient paths? Holiness to the Lord (Jer. 2:3). "I remember the devotion of your youth, your love as a bride, how you followed Me in the wilderness, in a land not sown. Israel was holy to the LORD, the firstfruits of His harvest." Do we not hear an echo of this for believers today? Revelation 2:4 says, "I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first."

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

So the words can become a slogan. The same writer draws the line between claiming the truth and living it.

The old paths and the good way mean much more than talking about divine principles or claiming to stand for the truth. The men standing for the truth in the book of Jeremiah were living it.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

God's Own Plea

The call is not cold. One writer describes the feeling behind it.

God lays His heart bare in these pleadings as nowhere else in Scripture. Like a husband deserted by an unfaithful wife, He pleads with them to return. Like a father heartbroken at the lawlessness of his children, He calls on them to obey.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

Why "Old" Means "Right"

The call assumes there is something worth going back to. One commentator turns that into a rule for every age of God's dealings.

At the start of each age God makes known the 'paths' that fit what He has set up. They do not change while that age lasts. Returning to them after a time of drifting away is always right. Let us see that we do so today.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The same writer sets out what doing right looks like once things have gone wrong.

First, confess the failure humbly and with a broken heart. Do not pretend that things are all right when all is wrong. Second, recognise that God always starts with what is right. Unlike man, He never experiments with something imperfect at the start and then works up to a better product.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Rest for Your Souls

The good way came with a promise of rest. Jesus later used the same words. One writer traces what happened to that promise.

"Rest for your souls" was proposed as the result of a faithful walk in the "old paths" of the law (see Jer. 6:16), but that rest was never attained by men. The only way to reach it was that made known by the Son, who had come to reveal the Father.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Refusing has a cost, and the cost is restlessness. Here is what people lose when they choose their own road.

When the blessed Lord was here on earth, He graciously invited them to come to Him and find rest for their souls. But man will not take that way. He chooses other ways, so he finds no real rest. He is like the troubled sea, stirred up and tossing. He knows no settled quietness of heart, no peace of mind, no divine calm.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

"We Will Not Walk in It"

The verse ends with the people passing sentence on themselves. History records what followed.

Many prophets were sent to call them back to the things that God had established at the beginning... But Israel refused, and so they went into captivity in Babylon.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Standing and Asking Today

The verse gives a personal task before a public one. One commentator states what that means now.

Our present duty has two parts. First, get our own souls right by testing all our ways and associations by the written Word. Second, use our influence to help others return to the "old paths" (Jeremiah 6:16).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Stand — the call comes to people soothed with "peace, peace" while judgment nears. The first step is to stop and listen.

- Ask — the ancient paths are not old customs. They are God's beginning: holiness to the Lord and the love of early days, echoed in the warning about abandoning the love you had at first.

- Walk — returning starts with a broken confession of failure, not a better system. What God set up at the start stays right, so going back is going forward.

- Rest — no one reached that rest under the law. The Son who reveals the Father is the only way into it. Every other road leaves the heart tossing like the sea.

- Refuse — "We will not walk in it" was their answer, and captivity followed. The same verse now asks each person to test their ways by Scripture and to help others back.

Jeremiah 6:17 · Darby

Also I have set watchmen over you -- Hearken ye to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken.

God had posted watchmen and had the trumpet blown, so the danger was announced long before it arrived. The people answered with a flat refusal — which raises two questions: who were these watchmen, and what does such a refusal cost?

The watchman and the trumpet

The verse pictures a watchman on the wall. Scripture uses the same picture for the prophet Ezekiel, and it puts two parties at risk, not one.

Ezekiel is set as a watchman to warn the house of Israel. If any ignored the sound of the trumpet, their blood would be on their own head. If the watchman did not blow the trumpet, his blood would pay the penalty.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Watchmen God appoints

Notice who posts the watchmen in this verse. That one detail decides how serious the refusal is.

Men might naturally, and usually would, appoint a watchman for themselves. But the prophet is not appointed by the people. God appoints him on their behalf. Even if there were no word from Him, the people would still be accountable. Yet God had provided a watchman for those too careless and indifferent to care for their own interests, even the most weighty ones. How this, even so, would increase the guilt of those who still refused the Voice that spoke to them!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Two invitations, two refusals

The verse just before this one offered the good old way. This verse adds the alarm. Jerusalem had a softer message on offer, and preferred it.

Jerusalem would not be instructed. The word of the Lord is to them a reproach. Wounds were healed only on the surface with a "Peace, peace," where there was none. They would neither take the good old way, nor pay attention to the warning of new troubles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why they would not listen

Their answer was not confusion. They heard the trumpet, and they still said no. Why does a warning meet that response?

We do not like having our conscience disturbed by hearing of our failures. Admitting that we are wrong, or have done wrong, is too humbling for religious flesh — unless we say it in the vaguest and most general terms. So the prophet who tries to exercise the conscience — who reminds God's people of their sins — is never popular. People welcome the mere "teacher" with enthusiasm, because gaining knowledge at a teacher's feet rather flatters the flesh.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

What follows the refusal

The chapter does not stop with the refusal. Jeremiah had done his part; now God stops pleading with Judah and calls the whole earth to hear.

Although he reminded them that watchmen had been set over them to warn them, they refused to listen. So He spoke further, "Hear, O earth! Behold I will certainly bring calamity on this people, even the fruit of their thoughts… Behold a people comes from the north country" (v. 19-25).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The trumpet still sounds

The pattern did not end with Jeremiah. God still warns before He strikes, and the reader stands inside that pattern now.

It is God's way, before drawing His sword, to sound the trumpet… Before God destroyed the earth by water, He sounded the warning trumpet through Noah. In our own time, before the last blow falls, His trumpet resounds in the gospel call. Will you not take notice of it, and seek salvation while you may?

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- Warning first. Before God draws the sword He sounds the trumpet — through Noah, through the prophets, and now through the gospel call.

- Warning given. God posts the watchman; the city does not hire him. He is God's provision for people too careless to look out for themselves.

- Warning refused. Judah turned down both offers of the chapter: the good old way, and the alarm about new trouble ahead.

- Warning resented. A messenger who exposes failure is never popular. People welcome a teacher who adds knowledge. They resist a prophet who stirs the conscience.

- Warning answered for. Whoever ignores the trumpet carries his own blood on his own head. Being given a watchman only deepens the guilt of refusing him.

Jeremiah 6:18 · Darby

Therefore hear, ye nations, and know, O assembly, what is among them.

Judah would not be instructed, would not walk the old paths, and would not hear the watchmen. So God turns from pleading with them to a wider audience: He calls the nations, and the earth itself, to hear what He is about to do to His own people — and why.

The "Therefore" That Opens the Verse

Verse 18 is a verdict, and it rests on everything said in the first half of the chapter. One survey of the chapter traces the refusals that lead up to it:

No: Jerusalem would not be instructed. To them, the word of Jehovah is an insult. Wounds were healed only on the surface with a "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They would neither go the good old way, nor attend to the warning of new woes. (Verses 1-17.)

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the Nations Are Summoned

Why call outsiders in to a family matter? One commentator answers this where another prophet makes the same call to the nations:

Why does He not leave the nations still to walk in their own ways, far from Him, in patience with their folly? It is because His own people are sinning against Him. They are the witness for His name on the earth, yet they have given themselves up to serving other gods, or to wickedness. There is no testimony of God left on the earth, except a false one. So God must give that testimony Himself.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

That is why the audience for this verdict is the whole earth.

What the Nations Must Know

The ESV says the nations are to know "what will happen to them"; older translations read "what is among them." Both are here: the state Judah is in, and the disaster it brings. One writer sets the refusals beside the invader God sends:

Although he urged the people to return to "the old paths" (Jer. 6:16) they decided not to. Although he reminded them that watchmen had been set over them to warn them, they refused to listen. So He spoke further: "Hear, O earth! Behold I will certainly bring calamity on this people, even the fruit of their thoughts…" And again: "Behold a people comes from the north country, and a great nation will be raised from the farthest parts of the earth" (vv. 19-25).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

"The Fruit of Their Thoughts"

The coming disaster is not something foreign bolted onto them. It is the harvest of their own thinking. One writer states the same rule, and says when the harvest comes:

The Lord is not mocked without consequence. "Therefore they shall eat the fruit of their way, and have their fill of their own devices." Sowing to the flesh must mean reaping destruction. He does not carry out judgment yet, but it will come — certain and soon.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A Law They Knew and Rejected

The next verse gives the reason: they paid no attention to God's words, and they rejected His law. This was not ignorance. Jeremiah's own book shows how well he and his hearers knew that law:

That Jeremiah knew such a law is certain. He mentions it directly, and often quotes it. In Jer. 9:13 the Lord says they "have forsaken my law that I set before them"; in Jer. 16:11, they "have not kept my law"; and in Jer. 6:19, "they have not paid attention to my words; and as for my law, they have rejected it."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

That makes the verse a warning far beyond Jerusalem. One writer draws the line forward to the present:

The people are plainly told that judgment and death lay before them. They were rejecting the law of God. We are living in an age when men reject the grace of God. Rejecting grace is more serious than rejecting law, as Hebrews tells us. When the gospel is preached, let this be made very plain.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Refused. "Therefore" points back. Jerusalem refused instruction, cried "Peace, peace" where there was no peace, and would not walk the good old way.

- Announced. God stops arguing with the guilty and calls the nations and the earth to hear the sentence He is about to carry out.

- Exposed. God shows the world the punishment and the reason for it: the people meant to be His witness had left Him without one.

- Reaped. The disaster coming on them is the fruit of their own thoughts. Sowing to the flesh means reaping destruction.

- Warned. They rejected a law they knew well. Rejecting the grace preached today is more serious still.

Jeremiah 6:19 · Darby

Hear, O earth behold, I will bring evil upon this people, the fruit of their thoughts; for they have not hearkened unto my words, and as to my law, they have rejected it.

Jeremiah has pleaded with Judah for chapters. Now the pleading stops: God announces the disaster, names its cause — they would not listen to His words — and summons the earth itself to hear.

Where the sentence falls in the chapter

The sentence lands at the end of a long list of charges. What ties them together is a city that would not be taught.

No: Jerusalem would not be taught. To them the word of Jehovah is an object of scorn. Wounds were healed only on the surface with a "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They would neither take the good old way, nor pay attention to the warning of new troubles.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The old paths they refused

The judgment follows a rejected invitation. God offered them a good road and posted watchmen to warn them. They turned down both.

He urged the people to return to "the old paths" (Jer. 6:16), but they decided against it. He reminded them that watchmen had been set over them to warn them, but they refused to listen. So He spoke further: "Hear, O earth; behold, I am bringing disaster upon this people, the fruit of their devices… Behold, a people is coming from the north country" (v. 19-22).

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Why the earth is called to listen

God does not judge His own people out of sight. Long ago Moses opened with a call to heaven and earth to listen, and that summons was there to clear God's name.

Moses says, "Give ear, O heavens, and I will speak, and let the earth hear the words of my mouth." Because he would proclaim the name of Jehovah, they were to ascribe greatness to their God… "His work is perfect, for all His ways are justice. A God of faithfulness and without iniquity, just and upright is He." As for the people, it was plain what they were. The corruption was theirs, not His; it belongs to His children, the blemish is theirs — a perverse and crooked generation.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Disaster grown from their own choices

The verse calls the disaster the fruit of their devices. It is not something foreign dropped on them. It is the crop their own sowing had to produce.

So man's sin points ahead to the judgment that must come on him. This is no arbitrary thing. The law is the same physically and morally, — "Whatever one sows, that will he also reap." In the true sense here, man is the maker of his own destiny.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Ears that would not hear

The verse says they had not paid attention to God's words. One writer puts the failure deeper than the ears: they took no delight in what God said, and God's patience with them had run out.

They did not hear because they had uncircumcised ears, and they took no delight in the Word of the Lord. The Lord will no longer hold back His fury; He will pour it out on them.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The law they threw away

"My law" is not vague. Jeremiah names it and quotes it again and again. The law was set before the people, so they knew what they were throwing away.

He mentions it directly, and often quotes it. So in Jer. 9:13 the Lord says, "They have forsaken my law that I set before them"; and in Jer. 16:11, "They have not kept my law"; and in Jer. 6:19, "They have not paid attention to my words, and as for my law, they have rejected it."

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same seed, the same harvest

Judah's harvest is not only Judah's. One writer sees the same seed going into the ground now.

And what was true of that generation, is true of this present age also. The seed which is being sown is Bible rejection; the rejection of the gospel of Christ, the seed of apostasy, will bring a harvest of judgment as it did with Israel.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned — God showed Jerusalem the good old way and set watchmen over her. The sentence in this verse follows warnings she refused, not warnings she never had.

- Deaf — the fault named is not listening. They took no delight in the Lord's word, and they threw away a law they knew and quoted.

- Harvest — the coming disaster is "the fruit of their devices." Sowing and reaping is no arbitrary rule; in this sense a person makes his own destiny.

- Witnessed — God calls the earth itself to listen. When He judges His own people, all can see that the corruption was theirs and His ways are just.

- Repeated — people sow the same seed today by rejecting God's word and the gospel, and commentators expect the same harvest.

Jeremiah 6:20 · Darby

To what purpose should there come to me incense from Sheba, and the sweet cane from a far country? Your burnt-offerings are not acceptable, nor are your sacrifices pleasing unto me.

Jeremiah 6 closes a long charge against Judah. At its end God turns from the coming invasion to the altar and asks what He wants with costly imported incense.

Ceremony Offered as Insurance

The verse sits inside a courtroom scene. God calls the nations and the earth to hear why judgment is falling. The offerings are the people's last defence.

Jeremiah calls upon the nations to hear his message: "Hear, O earth; behold, I am bringing disaster upon this people, the fruit of their devices, because they have not paid attention to My words; and as for My law, they have rejected it. What use to Me is frankincense that comes from Sheba, or sweet cane from a distant land?" Their ceremonies were vain hopes to hold back the judgment.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The offerings were not the cause of the trouble. Rejecting God's word was.

What They Were Bringing

The "sweet cane" was not a random luxury. It came from the recipe for Israel's holy anointing oil.

One of the ingredients of the holy anointing oil. The Hebrew word is qaneh, and it is three times translated 'calamus.' God lamented that Israel did not buy any sweet cane for Him (Isaiah 43:24). When they did bring it from far away, it was no longer sweet to Him because of their waywardness and sin.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the fault was never in the spice. Israel first refused to buy it. Later they paid to import it. Neither pleased God.

A Symbol Emptied of Its Reality

Incense stands for something beyond itself. One commentator finds that meaning in the Song of Solomon, where fragrance pictures the excellence of Christ.

Here, in the "Song of loves," this symbol of fragrant incense sets forth the excellence of Christ. God's rebuke through the prophet shows it was only a symbol. When incense became a mere form, He asked, "What use to Me is frankincense?" (Jeremiah 6:20).

Modernised from Samuel RidoutOriginal wording

A symbol has value only while it points to the reality behind it. Cut off from that, it is smoke and nothing more.

When God's Own Ordinances Offend Him

This is the sharpest edge of the verse. These were not pagan rites. God Himself had prescribed burnt offerings and incense — yet He refuses them. Writing on a similar passage in Isaiah, one commentator traces the reason back to the worshippers.

There was much piety according to the world. They kept up a round of religious forms to worship God. They never saw the lack of life, faithfulness and purity that marked them. They had a show of godliness, but they had denied its power… Their many sacrifices did not make their ways true before God. So the very things God had set up or commanded became, in their hands, things He hated. This was because the conscience of His people was not in line with His mind.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Correct form is no protection. A right ritual in a wrong conscience is what God says He hates.

What God Asked Instead

The next chapter names what God wanted instead.

He brands their sacrifices as worthless. He gave no command about burnt offerings and sacrifices on the day He brought them out of Egypt… When the Lord first led them out of Egypt, He gave them no laws about sacrifices. He asked for obedience. They did not listen; nor did they in Jeremiah's day. It is a nation that does not obey the voice of the Lord, nor receive correction.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Earlier in the same chapter God had already shown them the road back.

The prophet works hard to wake them up to the old paths, the good way, where they would find rest for their souls. But they said, "We will not walk in it" (v. 16). When the blessed Lord was here on earth, He kindly invited them to come to Him, and they would find rest for their souls. But man will not take that way. He chooses other ways; so he finds no real rest.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Rejected word. Judgment came because they ignored God's words and rejected His law. The offerings were a vain hope, not a cure.

- Costly, useless. Incense from Sheba and cane from a far country cost a great deal. Distance and price bought nothing. The offerings could not hold back the judgment their conduct had earned.

- Sweet no longer. Sweet cane belonged to the holy anointing oil. God once said Israel bought Him none. When they did bring it, their sin had made it no longer sweet to Him.

- Form without reality. Incense pictures the excellence of Christ. Once it became a mere form, God asked what use it was. Things He Himself commanded became hateful in hands with a wrong conscience.

- Obedience, not smoke. When He brought Israel out of Egypt, God asked for obedience. In this chapter He offered the old paths, the good way where the soul finds rest. People refused it then, and refuse it still when they choose their own way.

Jeremiah 6:21 · Darby

Therefore thus saith Jehovah Behold, I will lay stumbling-blocks before this people, and the fathers and the sons together shall fall over them; the neighbour and his friend shall perish.

Judah's altars were still busy when God announced that He Himself would lay stumbling blocks in His people's road. The hard question is why God would trip a nation He had chosen, and the answer lies in the verses just before.

Why the Sentence Fell

This judgment was not sudden temper. God gives His reason for it, and dismisses the offerings they hoped would hold it back:

"Hear, O earth; behold, I am bringing disaster upon this people, the fruit of their devices, because they have not paid attention to My words; and as for My law, they have rejected it. What use to Me is frankincense that comes from Sheba, or sweet cane from a distant land?" Their ceremonies were vain hopes to hold back the judgment. "Your burnt offerings are not acceptable, nor your sacrifices pleasing to Me."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Sweet cane was one of the spices used in Israel's holy anointing oil. A writer notes what had happened to it by Jeremiah's day:

God lamented that Israel did not buy any sweet cane for Him (Isaiah 43:24); and when they did bring it from afar, it was no longer sweet to Him because of their waywardness and sin.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Stumbling Blocks God Himself Lays

The verse does not say the people tripped by accident. God says He will lay the stumbling blocks. One writer explains why God hardens a person, using Pharaoh as the example:

God sent a testimony to Pharaoh, as He does to everyone in some form or another. But man left to himself always refuses the testimony of God... So man gives himself up to unbelief. Then God may, at that time or later, and according to His own wisdom, seal a person up in a judicial hardness. That is a distinct, positive act on God's part... God hardens because man refuses His word. So the hardening is a judicial act on God's part, which comes in after man has proved himself an unbeliever, and has persisted in it... It is never God who makes man an unbeliever. Hardening is a judgment which comes when man persists in unbelief in the face of clear and repeated testimony from God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

In this chapter the blow comes from the north. One commentator points the warning at readers today:

They did not hear because they had uncircumcised ears, nor did they delight in the Word of the Lord. How true this is today of the great mass of professing Christians! The Lord will now no longer restrain His fury; He will pour it out upon them... Then once more the judgment from the north is announced.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Nothing Shields Anyone

Fathers and sons, neighbour and friend — the verse names the closest human ties and lets them fall together. One writer sums up the record of that ruin, written by a heart crushed with grief:

This is the miserable state, described with such deep feeling by a heart crushed under grief — a heart that could not overstate how low God's ancient people had been brought. Sex, age, rank, place — nothing spared, and nothing sacred.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A good father could not cover a bad son either. One commentator shows how the people leaned on being descended from Abraham, the father of the nation:

Suppose this righteous man "fathers a son who is violent, a shedder of blood… shall he live because of his father's righteousness?" This was an important question for the Jewish people, and especially for those in exile. Cut off from their land and temple, they learned more and more to fall back on the merits of Abraham... God was dealing with them for their own sins. All the privileges they had through Abraham were forfeited if in their own character they were not Abraham's true children.

after_note: DISCUSS

Numerical Bible Notes

The Man Who Carried the Message

The message was severe. The man who carried it had to announce the ruin of the people he loved, and it broke him:

Grief overwhelmed the prophet's heart, because he loved the people. At the same time, he felt deeply what their relationship with the Lord meant... He had pleaded for the people. He had stood in the breach for them before the Lord. But he saw that it was all in vain: the people rejected God and the testimony He sent them... He could always say that if the people repented they would be received in grace. But he knew well that they had no thought of repenting.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — God calls the disaster the fruit of their own devices. They had heard His words and rejected them.

- Cover — Imported incense and burnt offerings were "vain hopes to hold back the judgment," not a substitute for listening.

- Act — The stumbling blocks are God's own doing — a judicial act that "comes in after man has proved himself an unbeliever, and has persisted in it."

- Reach — Fathers, sons, neighbour and friend fall together — "nothing spared, and nothing sacred." No father's good record saves his son.

- Heart — The warning came through a man overwhelmed with grief. He had pleaded for the very people he had to sentence.

Jeremiah 6:22 · Darby

Thus saith Jehovah Behold, a people cometh from the north country, and a great nation is stirred up from the uttermost parts of the earth.

For three chapters Jeremiah has described a nation that will not listen. Now the sentence falls: an army is on the move from the north, and two questions follow — who are these people, and who set them marching?

The Nation from the North

Commentators identify the northern invader with Babylon and its king.

From Jeremiah 4:3 to the end of Jeremiah 6 the prophet Jeremiah deals with the state of Israel. Chaos once overtook the far-off creation of Genesis 1:1. In the same way, ignorance of God and injustice were bringing chaos on the nation. No one could save that sad situation. So God raises up the instrument of His anger! The event to which the book points is to take place! Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle flag is raised! The trumpet sounds!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

When Jeremiah said this, nothing looked less likely.

In Josiah's day, Jerusalem looked very prosperous. Even so, the prophet announced over the city "disaster from the north, and great destruction" (Jer. 4:6). It came true exactly, but we easily overlook how miraculous it was. If someone announced today that a great capital city would be captured and destroyed, most people would smile and dismiss the idea. If it did happen, the fulfilment would be all the more striking because people had doubted it. That is how it is with Jeremiah's prophecy about Jerusalem.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Sent by God

The verse opens with "Thus says the LORD." The verses just before it say what this army is answering.

They treat the word of the LORD as an insult. They healed the wound only on the surface with a "Peace, peace," where there was no peace... "Therefore hear, O nations, and know, O congregation, what will happen to them. Hear, O earth; behold, I am bringing disaster upon this people, the fruit of their devices, because they have not paid attention to My words; and as for My law, they have rejected it." Their offerings were not acceptable. The northern foe is coming.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

God calls the invasion "the fruit of their devices." What came from outside had already grown inside.

The Invader Called "My Servant"

Later in the book the Lord names this northern power and gives it a title that would have shocked Jeremiah's hearers.

Here the Lord brings in Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, the great oppressor of the Jews He had warned about. He had told His people what was coming if they did not repent, and they had not repented. Now He announces, "Behold, I will send for all the tribes of the north, declares the LORD, and for Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, My servant."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Calling him a servant is not approval of him. Kelly says the same about another land God handed over to be destroyed.

Here God names the instrument of His vengeance plainly. That does not mean He had the smallest sympathy with the most fearsome of the nations and their drawn swords, or with the wicked men into whose hand the country was sold, or with the strangers who laid it waste. But the hour had come to judge that land's proud wickedness, and the worst nation was the fitting executioner for the dreadful work.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Rod Does Not Escape

Being used by God gave Babylon no protection from God.

God might use Jeroboam to discipline Solomon and his house. He might use the kings of Assyria to discipline Jeroboam's subjects. He might use Nebuchadnezzar to discipline Judah and its kings. But God has had to judge every one of them in turn. These rods of His anger (Isaiah 10:5) were no more faithful to God than the people He used them against.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Road Not Taken

Earlier in the chapter God offered the people another road, and they refused to walk in it.

In Jeremiah 6 we find the same state then: "Everyone is greedy for unjust gain" (v. 13). As in 1 Thessalonians 5:3, just before Christ comes, so here, they say, "Peace, peace" (Jer. 6:14). The prophet tries hard to wake them up to the old paths, the good way. There they would "find rest for your souls; but they said, We will not walk in it" (v. 16). When the blessed Lord was here on earth, He graciously invited them to come to Him and find rest for their souls. But man will not take that way. He chooses other ways; so he finds no real rest.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Refused. They would not walk in the old paths. They said "Peace, peace" instead, and this army is God's answer to that refusal.

- Sent. The army does not simply appear; God says He brings it, and calls it the fruit of their own devices.

- Named. The people from the north are Babylon under Nebuchadnezzar, whom God calls "My servant."

- Limited. Being God's rod was no shelter for Babylon. God judged every such rod in turn, since none was more faithful than the people it struck.

- Fulfilled. Jerusalem looked prosperous, yet the word came true exactly. The same voice still offers rest, and it still deserves a hearing.

Jeremiah 6:23 · Darby

They lay hold on bow and spear; they are cruel, and have no mercy; their voice roareth like the sea; and they ride upon horses, set in array as a man for the battle, against thee, daughter of Zion.

Chapter 6 closes Jeremiah's long charge against Judah. Here the prophet describes the invader itself: armed, merciless, and loud as the sea. Who is this people from the north, and why would God point such an army at His own city?

The enemy from the north

The army comes from the north. One commentator names it, and rules out the empire that had troubled Israel earlier:

Jeremiah dwells very much on Babylon from first to last. Babylon was this northern power that the Spirit of God has in mind throughout. It is not the Assyrian. The Assyrian was northern too, but that power was now destroyed. Assyria will rise again only in the last days. Meanwhile Babylon was the great power that overshadowed the earth. So Jeremiah draws attention to this new kingdom. "Then the LORD said to me, Out of the north disaster shall be let loose upon all the inhabitants of the land."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the army comes

So why send such an army? One writer points to the cause the Lord gives in these chapters:

In these chapters (4 to 6), the Lord again declares the cause of all their distress. He says, "They have forsaken Me, they have not known Me, they do not fear Me." … There was no man to stand in the breach, there was none who executed judgment, there was none who even sought the truth. What else could come! The desolation of such a nation, which had turned its back on the Lord, was inevitable.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summoned against the daughter of Zion

Notice who gives the marching orders. The prophet himself calls the besiegers forward, and Zion has no strength to meet them:

Zion was only a lovely and delicate woman, unable to defend her neighbours. The prophet then commissions the besiegers to come against Jerusalem, because greed and deceit were everywhere. Her destroyers would be so eager that neither the noon heat nor the dark of night would hold them back. Those under siege would lose all heart. … The northern foe is coming. Let Jerusalem clothe herself in sackcloth.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Cruel — and still on a leash

The verse calls this army cruel and merciless. God has used a wicked nation this way before, and never without limits:

God had taken Assyria up as the rod of His anger to chastise many a nation that was far from Him — and Israel among them. Later God used the Chaldeans in the same way. That is what disturbed Habakkuk. He protested that, bad as Israel might be, the Chaldeans were worse — and God was going to use them to discipline Israel. We see here what we see in Habakkuk too: that God may use an evil nation to chastise His faithless people, but only under His strict supervision and control.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

God's use of a nation does not excuse it. Here is what happens to the instrument afterwards:

God uses the pride and wickedness of the wicked to chastise His people, and afterwards He destroys the instrument.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Measured, not final

Later in the book that cruelty comes back, but now God calls the wound His own — and sets a limit on it:

"Though I make a full end of all nations where I have scattered you, I will not make a full end of you. I will correct you in measure, and I will not leave you entirely unpunished. … I have wounded you with the wound of an enemy, with the chastisement of a cruel one, because your guilt is great." … "For I will restore health to you, and I will heal you of your wounds, says the LORD; because they called you an Outcast, saying, This is Zion whom no man seeks after."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The rest that was refused

Earlier in the chapter the prophet offered an older, better road, and they refused it. The invader roars like the sea — and so, one commentator says, does the heart that refuses rest:

The prophet works hard to wake them up about the old paths, the good way. There they should "find rest for their souls; but they said, We will not walk in it." When the blessed Lord was here on earth, in grace He invited them to come to Him and find rest for their souls. But man will not take that way. He chooses other ways, so he finds no real rest. He is like the troubled sea, restless and tossing. He knows no settled quiet of heart, no peace of mind.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — They had forsaken God, did not know Him, did not fear Him. No man stood in the breach, so the army comes.

- Commission — The besiegers do not just arrive. The prophet calls them, and Zion must put on sackcloth instead of trusting her own strength.

- Control — God may use an evil nation as the rod of His anger. He keeps it under strict control, and destroys the instrument afterwards.

- Measure — God calls the wound His own, yet He corrects in measure and will not make a full end of His people.

- Cure — The hand that wounds promises to heal. The rest Judah refused, Christ Himself later offered.

Jeremiah 6:24 · Darby

We have heard the report thereof our hands are grown feeble; anguish hath taken hold of us, pain as of a woman that travaileth.

The people of Jerusalem speak here, and their words are a confession. The report of the coming army has emptied them of strength before a single blow has landed.

The Enemy Announced

Jeremiah 6 closes a long charge against Judah. One commentator walks through the chapter. Zion is too weak to defend herself, the prophet calls the besiegers against her, and the comfort she trusts is not true:

Zion was only a lovely and delicate woman, unable to defend her neighbours. The prophet then commissions the besiegers to come against Jerusalem, and this because of widespread covetousness and deceit. Her plunderers were so eager that neither the midday heat nor the dark of night would slow them down. This left those under siege deeply discouraged. No: Jerusalem would not be instructed. The word of Jehovah is an insult to them. A "Peace, peace," healed their wounds only on the surface, when there was no peace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the News Paralysed Them

Hands go limp because nothing had prepared them. They were telling each other "Peace, peace," and they had turned down the one invitation that offered rest:

As in 1 Thessalonians 5:3, just before Christ comes, so here, they say, "Peace, peace" (Jer. 6:14). The prophet works hard to wake them up to the old paths, the good way, where they would "find rest for their souls; but they said, We will not walk in it" (v. 16). When the blessed Lord was here on earth, He invited them in grace to come to Him and find rest for their souls. But man will not take that way. He chooses other ways, so he finds no real rest. He is like the sea, restless and tossing. He knows no settled quiet of heart, no peace of mind, no divine calm.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The Figure of Labour Pains

The same picture of labour pains returns in 1 Thessalonians 5:3. One writer points out who is in view there:

Many fall into complete confusion right there. They do not see the difference between the hope of the Christian and "the day" for the world… Speaking of the day of the Lord, he says, "When they say, Peace and safety, then sudden destruction comes upon them, like labour pains on a pregnant woman." He does not say "you," but "they." Why this difference? When he is speaking about the presence of the Lord, he says "you," "we"; but when treating of the day of Jehovah, he says "they."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where Faith Stands When the Blow Falls

Feeble hands are not the end of the story. The same anguish comes back later in the book, and one writer says what faith does with a blow like this:

The prophet feels most keenly the anguish of such desolation from Jehovah's hand — not merely famine in the land, but a sweeping captivity out of it. In such circumstances faith always shows the same spirit. It accepts the blows as measured out in righteousness from His hand. It does not treat them as a mistake on the people's part, or as the skill and strength of their enemies. God ruled in it all, and this in view of His people's shameless departure from Himself.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Beyond Babylon

Later in Jeremiah the same labour pains describe a trouble far greater than the return from Babylon:

One striking feature of that day is this: it is the day of their greatest trouble, yet at once it brings their complete and, as we shall see, final deliverance. The return from Babylon does not match that description at all… So the hour of trouble like no other, coming just before their great deliverance, is still future, and it will certainly happen… "Alas! That day is great, and there is none like it. It is the time of Jacob's trouble, but he shall be saved out of it."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Report. The news alone unnerved Jerusalem. The attackers stopped for neither noon heat nor night, and the besieged lost heart.

- Refusal. The prophet pointed them to the old paths and rest for their souls. They said they would not walk in it, so they found no real rest.

- Reassurance. "Peace, peace" healed the wound on the surface only; there was no peace.

- Reach. The same labour pains appear again. Sudden destruction falls on people saying "peace and safety" — and the word is "they," not "you."

- Rest. Faith takes the blow as measured out in righteousness from God's hand. And the greatest trouble of all still ends with Jacob saved out of it.

Jeremiah 6:25 · Darby

Go not forth into the field, nor walk by the way; for [there is] the sword of the enemy, terror is on every side.

The warning here is to keep out of the fields and off the roads. An invading army has made every direction unsafe — and this falls on a city that had just been promised that all was well.

The Siege Behind the Warning

The rest of the chapter explains the danger. One writer follows its closing section, where the prophet calls the attacking army in:

This closing part of the charge adds to the terrors of the scene. It starts with the call to the people of Benjamin to leave the doomed city... Next, the prophet orders the besiegers to come against Jerusalem, and this because of greed and lying everywhere. Her destroyers would be so eager that neither the heat of noon nor the darkness of night would delay them. Those under siege were left in deep discouragement.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Attackers who stop for neither noon nor night leave no safe hour. This verse adds that there is no safe place.

The Fruit of Their Own Thoughts

The enemy's sword is not bad luck. God says what He is bringing, and traces it back to the people's own thinking:

Hear, O earth: behold, I will bring evil upon this people. It is the fruit of their thoughts, because they have not listened to My words, nor to My law, but rejected it... Their ceremonies were empty hopes for holding off the judgment.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

False Peace and Refused Rest

A few verses earlier the cry was "Peace, peace." One writer ties that false calm to an offer of rest the people turned down:

As in 1 Thessalonians 5:3, just before Christ comes, so here they say, "Peace, peace" (Jer. 6:14). The prophet works hard to wake them up about the old paths, the good way. There they would "find rest for their souls; but they said, We will not walk in it" (v. 16). When the blessed Lord was here on earth, He graciously invited them to come to Him and find rest for their souls. But man will not take that way. He chooses other ways, so he finds no real rest. Like the troubled sea in its tossing, he knows no settled quietness of heart, no peace of mind.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A Phrase That Became a Name

The phrase does not stay a description. Later in Jeremiah it becomes a man's name:

The great Pashhur, the chief officer in the house of the LORD, had heard of the message. He strikes Jeremiah and puts him in the stocks... In this position Jeremiah stayed all night before the high gate of Benjamin. In the morning he was released. He then speaks as only an inspired prophet can speak. His name Pashhur, which means "most noble," should now be "Magor-missabib," which means "terror on every side."

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The city lived with terror on every side. The man who attacked God's prophet had to carry those words as his name.

Fear Outside, Shelter Inside

Here the people are surrounded and afraid. A psalm records a man just as surrounded, who was not afraid:

Had the enemies, then, all been driven away? No; but his fears had. "I will not be afraid of many thousands of people who have set themselves against me all around" (v. 6). "But you, O LORD, are a shield about me" (v. 3). Inside he was guarded like a fortress, though he still looked just as exposed on the outside.

Modernised from George CuttingOriginal wording

Another writer sets out both sides — what fear does, and what trust does:

Unbelief constantly brings on us the very thing we dread... Where there is simple confidence in the Lord, it is astonishing how the tables are turned. Then the enemies stand in dread of the feeblest people who have faith in the living God.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. God calls the sword outside the walls "the fruit of their thoughts" — the harvest of a people who heard His words and rejected them.

- Comfort. The cry had been "Peace, peace." The result is a city whose people cannot even walk their own roads.

- Refusal. The people would not walk in the old paths, so they never found the rest promised there. The Lord later offered the same rest, and men still turn it down.

- Name. "Terror on every side" later becomes a man's name — Magor-missabib — given to the officer who struck the prophet.

- Contrast. The enemies can stay while the fear goes. Anyone who trusts God has a guard inside, however exposed he looks outside.

Jeremiah 6:26 · Darby

Daughter of my people, gird thee with sackcloth, and roll thyself in ashes make mourning, [as] for an only son -- bitter lamentation; for the spoiler cometh suddenly upon us.

Jeremiah 6 ends a long charge against Judah. The prophet now tells his people how to mourn, and the question is why he says it before the blow has even landed.

The setting: warnings refused, offerings useless

By this point in the chapter, God has closed the case. Religious ceremony could not hold back what was coming, and the prophet who announced it grieved over it.

Their ceremonies were vain hopes to hold back the judgment. "Your burnt offerings are not acceptable, and your sacrifices do not please Me." So the LORD would put stumbling blocks before this people. Fathers and sons together would fall over them, and neighbour and friend would perish. At the same time, the prophet's heart is full of sorrow for the nation.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

That sorrow shows in the wording of the verse. Jeremiah does not say the destroyer is coming upon you. He says upon us.

Sackcloth and ashes: grief made visible

Ashes were not a private feeling. People wore them, lay in them, and let others see them.

Ashes, mostly from burnt wood, were a sign of sorrow or mourning. People put them on the head (2 Sam. 13:19), or on the body with sackcloth (Esther 4:1; Jer. 6:26; Lam. 3:16), or spread them on a couch to lie on (Esther 4:3; Isa. 58:5; Jonah 3:6). Eating ashes expresses great sorrow (Ps. 102:9), and being reduced to ashes is a picture of complete destruction.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The sign is worthless without the reality

A person can wear sackcloth with no repentance at all. One writer points to a king who kept his sackcloth hidden under his robes.

The king had the sackcloth on inside, covered up by his robes. But that kind of repentance will not do. A man should be genuine, honest, and open when he admits his sin. It is not that I want a display. No, no: but you must be real, whatever you are. God searches the heart and tests the inmost thoughts. He knows what is in a man, and He will have you and me confess honestly what we are — lost sinners in our sins.

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

"Suddenly the destroyer will come upon us"

The word suddenly stands against what the same chapter records people saying: "Peace, peace." One writer sets that beside a warning about the days just before Christ returns.

In Jeremiah 6 we find the same state then: "Everyone is greedy for unjust gain" (v. 13). As in 1 Thessalonians 5:3, just before Christ comes, so here, they say, "Peace, peace" (Jer. 6:14). The prophet works hard to wake them up to the old paths, the good way, where they would find rest for their souls. But they said, "We will not walk in it" (v. 16). When the blessed Lord was here on earth, He invited them to come to Him and find rest for their souls. But man will not take that way. He chooses other ways; so he finds no real rest.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

"As for an only son": the word behind the figure

The Hebrew word behind "only son" is yachid. The other ways it gets translated show what kind of loss the prophet means.

The expression also suggests the thought of the deepest affection, as with the Old Testament word yachid. Translators render it in different ways: "only one" (Gen. 22:2, 12), "only son" (Jer. 6:26; Amos 8:10; Zech. 12:10), "only beloved" (Prov. 4:3), and "darling" (Ps. 22:20; 35:17).

Modernised from W. E. VineOriginal wording

The same grief, one day, over Christ

The same figure returns in Zechariah 12:10, where the mourning is over a Person and not over a city.

The sorrow of those who will find a Saviour in "Him whom they have pierced" will not be despair... These words show us the character of their bitter sorrow. The One they had rejected, whose death they had caused, was worthy of all the love of the nation. Their sorrow and their love will melt together in one shared act of humbling.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — ceremony could not stop what was coming; burnt offerings and sacrifices were "vain hopes to hold back the judgment."

- Call — sackcloth and ashes were the known outward sign of sorrow; people wore them on head and body, and lay in them.

- Reality — sackcloth hidden under a robe is not repentance. God searches the heart and wants honest confession, not display.

- Suddenness — people were saying "Peace, peace" while the destroyer was already coming. God offered the good way and they refused it.

- Only son — the word yachid carries the deepest affection. The same grief returns in Zechariah 12, when Israel mourns over the One they pierced.

Jeremiah 6:27 · Darby

I have set thee among my people as an assayer, a fortress, that thou mayest know and try their way.

God puts Jeremiah in the middle of a nation already under sentence. He gives him two roles at once. Jeremiah is to stand firm like a fortress, and to test the people the way a metalworker tests silver. The next verses give the result. So what is God doing when He sets a faithful servant among an unfaithful people?

The prophet's own position

Chapter 6 does more than repeat earlier charges. One writer notes that it announces judgment and, at the same time, shows where the messenger stands:

Jeremiah 6 continues the testimony, but also gives the position of Jeremiah in the middle of all this evil. In verses 11-26 the judgment is plainly announced.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Set apart before he was set up

The strength here was not Jeremiah's own character. God gave it to him, and gave it long before: He set him apart for this before his birth. Older translations render the opening words "a tower and a fortress" where the ESV has "a tester of metals":

"I have set you," says God, "for a tower and a fortress among My people, that you may know and try their way." (Jer. 6:27.) God had sanctified him for this (chap. 1:5), and the nation would fight against him. (ver. 19.) He did not suffer as one joined to them, but as one set apart from them, while God still gave him a deep interest in them. That is, he suffered as a prophet. … He suffered because he shared in the word of God. … His heart and spirit were joined with them, in keeping with God's love for them, and he felt their sorrow and their sins.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A promise that held under fire

The fortress promise held when the pressure came. One writer traces it through Jeremiah's life under a king who would not listen, quoting Jeremiah 1:18-19 in an older wording:

Jeremiah (Jer. 22:13-19) and other prophets pour out the Lord's warnings on King Jehoiakim, but he does not listen. … Jeremiah faces the same dangers, but this man of God trusts in the word of the Lord: "And behold, I appoint you this day as a fortified city, an iron pillar, and bronze walls, against the whole land… They will fight against you, but they shall not prevail against you, for I am with you, says Jehovah, to deliver you" (Jer. 1:18-19; see also Jer. 6:27; Jer. 15:20-21). The Lord watches over him according to this word.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The test and its verdict

God set the prophet there to know and test the people's way. The chapter then gives what the test found. God makes one man unbreakable. The nation he tests turns out to be worthless metal:

They would neither go the good old way, nor listen to the warning of new troubles. … But if the Lord makes Jeremiah a fortress, the people are no better than reprobate silver, rejected by Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The words come from a real refining process. That is why the verdict is so hard. The fire did its work, but no pure silver came out:

Instead of "the bellows are burned," some prefer to translate "the bellows puff, or blow, and the lead is consumed in the fire." People once used lead to purify silver. Jer. 6:29. The point is that judgment had not refined Israel: "reprobate silver shall men call them." Jer. 6:30.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What every test proves

The failure is not one nation's bad season. One writer draws from it a conclusion that reaches past Jeremiah's day:

All testing ends in failure, and God must act for us and not with us. … Every effort to make something of him, or to do something with him, only exposes him again. In the end he stands naked in his shame. No tested creature enters the kingdom, even though grace tests him. Judgment as of "reprobate silver" is the result of the process. "The bellows are burnt, the lead is consumed by the fire, the metalworker melts in vain."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Summary

- Placed. God stationed Jeremiah inside the evil, not outside it. The same chapter announces judgment and shows where the messenger stands.

- Prepared. God gave the firmness. He set Jeremiah apart for it before birth, knowing the nation would fight him.

- Protected. God kept the fortress promise of Jeremiah 1:18-19. He watched over Jeremiah according to His word.

- Proved. The test gave a verdict: the fire burned, the lead was spent, and no pure silver came out. The people were rejected silver.

- Past testing. Since every trial ends in failure, no one enters the kingdom as a tested creature; God must act for us, not with us.

Jeremiah 6:28 · Darby

They are all the most rebellious of rebels, going about with slander they are bronze and iron; they are all corrupters.

At the end of Jeremiah 6, God posts Jeremiah among his own people to test them, the way a refiner tests metal. Verse 28 is the report he hands in, and it forces a hard question: what happens when the test finds nothing worth keeping?

The Prophet Posted as Tester

Jeremiah did not drift into this role. God appointed him to it, and the appointment cost him. (Translations differ at verse 27: some read "a tower and a fortress", others "a tester of metals".)

"I have set you," says God, "for a tower and a fortress among My people, that you may know and try their way." (Jer. 6:27.) God had sanctified him for this (chap. 1:5), and the nation would fight against him (chap. 1:19). He suffers not as one joined with them, but as one set apart from them, though God gave him a real concern for them — that is, he suffers as a prophet.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same posting is an honour, and it is not only for Jeremiah.

In the final paragraph of this chapter the Lord speaks personally to the prophet. He encourages and strengthens him. He sets him as a tower and as a fortress. What a position of honour! May we consider it, since a flood of falling away from God surrounds us, His believing people. We too are called to be a tower and fortress.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"They Are All"

The verse names no one in particular. The charge covers the whole city, and under the greed and the lies sits a refusal to be taught.

Next, the prophet calls the attacking armies to come against Jerusalem, and this is for her universal covetousness and deceit… No: Jerusalem would not be taught. The word of the Lord is a reproach to them. Wounds were healed only on the surface with a "Peace, peace," where there was no peace… But if the Lord makes Jeremiah a fortress, the people are no better than reprobate silver, rejected of Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Going About with Slanders

Jeremiah did not invent this charge. The wording comes from the law, and it is rare in the rest of the Bible.

Again, the words, "Whoever goes about slandering reveals secrets" (Prov. 11:13; Prov. 20:19), come from Lev. 19:16, "You shall not go around as a slanderer among your people," and do not occur anywhere else, except Jer. 6:28 and Jer. 9:3.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

So the sin here breaks a command they already had in writing. And it does more harm than it looks.

Even if a slanderer's words were strictly true, which is rarely the case, they are harmful in every way, and they come under the condemnation of evil speaking. They completely lack a moral purpose or a loving manner. It is at best gossip, and mostly just the pleasure of talking about things that right feeling would rather keep hidden. The result is wounds that pierce very deep, where they are least curable.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Bronze and Iron

Verse 28 calls them base metal, and the next two verses explain the image with a refiner's workshop. Where older translations read "reprobate silver", newer ones read "rejected silver".

Instead of "the bellows are burned," some prefer to translate "the bellows puff, or blow, and the lead is consumed in the fire." Lead was once used to purify silver. Jer. 6:29. The point is that Israel had not been refined by judgment: "men will call them reprobate silver." Jer. 6:30.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Other translations of the same word make the verdict plainer.

God's ancient people in their condition of moral debasement are compared to "reprobate silver," or "refuse silver" as in the margin, Jer. 6:30; or, as is read in Isa. 1:22, "your silver has become dross," rejected.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Why Testing Was Never the Cure

Every test ends the same way, and the problem is bigger than one generation in Judah.

All testing ends in failure, and God must act for us and not with us… Every effort to make something of him, or to do something with him, leads him only to another exposure of himself, until he is left naked to his shame… He must be saved by grace, and not just tested by it.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The Man Who Was Not There

Jeremiah tested the nation, but the nation needed something else: a man to stand for it.

Therefore "Men will call them reprobate silver, because the Lord has rejected them" (Jer. 6:30). There was no man to stand in the breach. There was no one who did what was just. There was no one who even sought the truth. What else could come!… The man was not there. Both the land and the nation must wait for the return of "The Man Christ Jesus". He was raised from among the dead, He is of the seed of David, and He is now hidden in the heavens. They shall not wait in vain!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Posted. God set Jeremiah among his people as a tower and fortress, to test their way. It was an honour, and it meant the nation would fight him.

- Tested. The charge covers everyone alike: covetousness, deceit, and slander — and a "Peace, peace" where there was no peace.

- Slander. Going about with slanders breaks the command of Leviticus 19:16. Such words are wounds that go deep and heal hardest.

- Rejected. The refining failed. The bellows blow, the lead is spent, and what is left is called refuse silver.

- Grace. Testing only exposes. The cure is not a better result from man but salvation by grace — and the Man who was missing then will come.

Jeremiah 6:29 · Darby

The bellows are burned, the lead is consumed by the fire; they have melted, and melted in vain; and the bad are not plucked away.

Jeremiah 6 ends inside a metal-worker's shop. The furnace roars, the refiner works, and nothing good comes out. The verse asks a hard question: what happens when a nation meets God's dealings with no change at all?

The Picture Behind the Words

The picture comes from the ancient craft of purifying silver. The refiner threw lead into the crucible to soak up the impurities and carry them off. The bellows drove the fire hot enough for the work to happen. One source explains both the trade detail and the wording:

Instead of "the bellows are burned," some prefer to translate "the bellows puff, or blow, and the lead is consumed in the fire," since refiners once used lead to purify silver. Jer. 6:29. The point is that judgment had not refined Israel: people will call them rejected silver. Jer. 6:30. Egyptian monuments show bellows with two bags, on which a man stands. He lifts each foot in turn and pulls a string. Each bag fills with air, and as his foot comes down it drives the blast into the fire.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The ESV takes that preferred reading: the bellows blow, and the fire consumes the lead. So the fire did its work. The labour was real, and the metal came out unchanged.

The Assayer and His Verdict

Earlier in the chapter God had set Jeremiah in place as a tester of the people's ways, and the prophet himself becomes the contrast to the material he is examining. One writer traces the whole chapter to this ending — refused instruction, false promises of peace, rejected offerings — and lands on the outcome:

No: Jerusalem would not be instructed. The word of Jehovah is to them a reproach. The wounds got only a surface cure — a "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They would not walk in the good old way, and they would not listen to the warning of new troubles... But if the Lord makes Jeremiah a fortress, the people are no better than rejected silver, rejected by Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Lord made one man a fortress. The nation He left as waste metal.

Why the Heat Achieved Nothing

The furnace does not fail because of some defect in God's method. It fails because of what was in the crucible. Chapters 4 to 6 name the cause plainly, and one writer gathers it up:

In these chapters (4 to 6), the Lord again declares the cause of all their distress. He says, "They have forsaken Me, they have not known Me, they do not fear Me"... Therefore "People will call them rejected silver, because the Lord has rejected them" (Jer. 6:30). No man stood in the gap, no one did justice, no one even looked for the truth. What else could come!... Both the land and the nation must wait for the coming again of "The Man Christ Jesus", raised from among the dead, from the line of David, now hidden in the heavens.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Note the order: people call them rejected silver because God rejected them first. The name follows His verdict; it does not cause it.

The Furnace Wider Than One Nation

One writer widens the verse past one nation and one century. He reads it as a sample of everything God has ever tried with man:

All testing ends in failure, and God must act for us and not with us. This fresh trial, through the ministry of the Messiah, only proves by a second witness that man cannot be corrected or cured. Every effort to make something of him, or to do something with him, only exposes him again, until he stands naked in his shame. No tested creature enters the kingdom, even when grace is the one testing him. The process ends in the judgment passed on "rejected silver".

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

On this reading, the verdict here is not an old curiosity. It is where every effort to improve what is already spoiled ends up.

Where the Refining Does Succeed

The prophets also describe a refining that works — a third part brought through the fire and purified. Commenting on that later scene, one writer draws the distinction that makes sense of Jeremiah's failed crucible:

This expresses only the full confidence reached as the result of purification; but it is because they are "silver" He refines them. No one ever refined into silver what was not silver; and that is not what is done here.

Modernised from Frederick W GrantOriginal wording

Fire purifies silver. It cannot make silver. That is why Jeremiah's generation came out of the furnace as waste. The nation's hope lies elsewhere — in the Man it must still wait for. As one writer ends: "they shall not wait in vain!"

Summary

- Fire — Bellows, lead and heat are a silver-refiner's tools. God put His people under real heat.

- Failure — The fire ran its full course, and the metal came out unchanged. Judgment had not refined them.

- Verdict — People call them rejected silver only because God rejected them first. The name follows His sentence.

- Reach — One writer widens the failed crucible to man himself. Every trial, even under grace, exposes him again instead of curing him.

- Remnant — Fire can purify silver, but it can never create silver. Hope rests on the Man still to come, not on a hotter furnace.

Jeremiah 6:30 · Darby

Reprobate silver shall they call them, for Jehovah hath rejected them.

Jeremiah 6 closes with the language of a metal refinery. The fire has burned, the smelting is over, and the result is a lump of metal nobody will take. Where the ESV reads "rejected silver," older translations read "reprobate silver," and most writers quoted here use that older wording. Two questions follow: what failed in the furnace, and who passed the verdict?

The refiner's picture

The verse just before this one describes a smelting that produced nothing. One reference work explains the process behind those words, and what it pictured.

Instead of "the bellows are burned," some prefer to translate "the bellows puff, or blow, and the lead is consumed in the fire" (Jer. 6:29). Lead was once used to purify silver. The point is that judgment had not refined Israel: "reprobate silver shall men call them" (Jer. 6:30).

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The word behind "rejected" has a fixed sense. One writer defines it from the metal trade itself.

A reprobate is one cast out as good for nothing; a figure from reprobate silver.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why the fire failed to purify

The verdict has a stated cause. Chapters 4 to 6 name it again and again, and one commentator gathers those charges before he reaches this verse.

In these chapters (4 to 6), the Lord again declares the cause of all their distress. He says, "They have forsaken Me, they have not known Me, they do not fear Me" (Jer. 4:22; 5:7, 19, 22)… Therefore "Reprobate silver shall men call them, because the Lord has rejected them" (Jer. 6:30). There was no man to stand in the breach, there was none who executed judgment, there was none who even sought the truth. What else could come!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

One man kept, a nation refused

The chapter that ends in rejection also makes Jeremiah a fortress. One commentator sets the two side by side.

No: Jerusalem would not take instruction. The word of the Lord is an insult to them. Wounds were healed only on the surface with a "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They would not walk in the good old way, and they would not listen to the warning of new troubles… But if the Lord makes Jeremiah a fortress, the people are no better than reprobate silver, rejected of Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Note where the verse lands: what people call them only echoes what the Lord has already decided.

The wider trial

One writer reads the failed refining as a picture of something larger than one nation's collapse. Every test God applies to fallen man ends the same way.

All testing ends in failure, and God must act for us and not with us… Every effort to make something of him, or to do something with him, only exposes him again. In the end he is left naked to his shame. A tested creature does not enter the kingdom, even though grace tests him. The process ends in judgment, like that passed on "reprobate silver." "The bellows are burnt, the lead is consumed by the fire, the founder melts in vain."

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Mercy after the verdict

The verdict of worthlessness is not the last word. Writing about an earlier collapse in Israel's history, one commentator sets that test result beside what God chose to do next.

This was the righteous forfeiture of all their blessing. So the time had now come when the Lord must decide: to lay hold on judgment, or to bring mercy. He might now have sworn in His wrath that Israel should never enter His rest. They had been tested, and were found "reprobate silver." "O Israel, you have destroyed yourself," might now be the lament over them. But the Lord was about to reply, "but in Me is your help," for the Lord is God and not man… He prepares mercies for them, and lets mercy rejoice against judgment.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

Vine ends at the same place. The nation that failed the test is left waiting for one Man.

The man was not there. Both the land and the nation must wait for the coming again of "The Man Christ Jesus," raised from among the dead, of the seed of David, now hidden in the heavens. They shall not wait in vain!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Tested. The image is a smelting works: bellows blowing, lead consumed, fire hot — and no pure metal at the end.

- Caused. These chapters name the reason: they had forsaken Him, had not known Him, did not fear Him, and no man stood in the gap.

- Rejected. "Reprobate" means cast out as good for nothing. The label people use only repeats the verdict the Lord has already passed.

- Universal. Every trial of fallen man ends the same way. God must act for us, not with us — the furnace exposes; it does not improve.

- Answered. A people found worthless still had a future. God is God and not man, and mercy wins where the refining failed.

Jeremiah 7:1 · Darby

The word that came to Jeremiah from Jehovah, saying,

The verse is only a heading — a word arrives from the Lord for Jeremiah. What follows depends on where God told him to carry it. He had to take God's message to the one place the nation felt safest: the door of God's own house.

Where the section starts

Chapter 7 opens a new block of prophecy. Kelly shows what holds these chapters together:

Jeremiah 7-10 begin with the house of God as the witness of the people's sin and the starting-point of His judgment.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A dictionary entry on the book puts the same thing in a sentence, and names what was wrong underneath the outward religion:

Jeremiah 7 to 10. This section is about the temple. The people boasted of possessing the temple, but there was insincerity and idolatry. Moving appeals are made, and judgements declared.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A harder assignment

God had already sent Jeremiah to cry out in the hearing of Jerusalem. This time the task got harder, because of where he had to stand:

In chapter 2:1-2 he must "Go and cry in the hearing of Jerusalem, saying, 'Thus says the Lord'."

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

The congregation he had to face

The people he faced were on their way in to worship. Gaebelein pictures the scene at the gate:

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

That hollowness is the thread running through the whole address, and it is set against something better at the end of it:

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What God asked for instead

Kelly explains why no privilege can cover ongoing sin:

God must have reality in His people.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the building could not save them

Later in the same address God points them to Shiloh. Kelly draws the lesson:

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same danger now

Vine ties this warning to a rule Peter states in the New Testament:

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Word — the chapter starts with a message from the Lord, not from Jeremiah; the prophet's job was to carry it.

- Gate — the place makes the point: God sent the word to meet worshippers at the very door of His house.

- Reality — God wants truth in His people, not a form. Being near Him calls for more watchfulness, never less.

- Shiloh — God once profaned the place where the tabernacle first stood; He will not prop up an empty form.

- Us — when people twist the truth while still using His name, judgment begins at the house of God.

Jeremiah 7:2 · Darby

Stand in the gate of Jehovah's house, and proclaim there this word, and say, Hear ye the word of Jehovah, all Judah, that enter in at these gates to worship Jehovah.

God gives Jeremiah a message and a place to deliver it. He must stand at the temple gate and speak to the crowd walking in to worship. Does the right building and the right routine count for anything when the lives behind them tell another story?

The pulpit God chose

God chose the spot. One man stood at the door of God's own house, facing every worshipper who came through.

We call this next address of the prophet "the temple address," because God told him to stand in the gate of the LORD's house. There he stood, a lone figure, and said: "Hear the word of the LORD, all you men of Judah who enter these gates to worship the LORD." Their worship was only outward. They trusted in the temple of the Lord, as if the house itself carried a blessing and would shield them from disaster.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A commission that grew harder

This was not Jeremiah's first assignment, and the demands on him kept rising with each one.

In chapter 2:1-2 he must "Go and cry in the hearing of Jerusalem." In chapter 7:1-2 the test becomes more severe, since he must stand in the gate of the Lord's house and speak to all who come in to worship. Later, after nineteen years of ministry, he must "Stand in the court of the Lord's house, and speak to all the cities of Judah... all the words that I command you to speak to them." He must not leave out a word.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Worshippers with nothing inside

These people did the right thing in the right place. It did not help them.

Hypocrites may "enter these gates to worship the LORD," trusting in deceptive words and saying, "This is the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD" (Jer. 7:4). But such sayings never took the place of inward reality before God. They only made their case worse.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Gaebelein names what those same worshippers were like.

They trusted in lying words. They were thieves, murderers, adulterers, liars under oath and idol worshippers, and they thought that if they went to the house of the LORD they would be delivered from these evils.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Confidence in a building

Why were they so calm? They treated God's power as a guarantee for the building.

Man is loudest about his own security when he pays least attention to God's sovereign grace and to his own responsibility to bear true witness to Him. The Jew flattered himself that the temple must stand by God's power, whatever the people might be.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same mistake has a modern form.

Huge numbers claim to be Christians, and most of them trust the symbols and ceremonies of Christianity instead of Christ the Son of God. Many trust in their baptism, in taking the Lord's supper, in their church going. All the while they neglect the salvation that is in Christ Jesus, and they have no living faith in Him.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

What God asks for

God is not asking for more religion. He is asking for something real, and grace does not lower that standard.

God must have reality in His people. Grace was never meant to weaken the moral ways of God, and it never can be allowed to. In fact, grace is the only spring of power that makes those ways precious in our eyes and gives us firmness in walking by them… There is no more destructive trap than the idea that people who sin, and go on sinning, can plead privilege. God's righteous government of His people is as certain as the mercy which chose and blessed them. Let them forget neither!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Judgment starts at the house that bears His Name

The warning comes at God's house, and God's house is where judgment starts. It had happened once before, at Shiloh, the first place where God put His name.

And what a solemn fact it is — judgment fell upon the house "which was in Shiloh", where the Lord set His "Name at the first" (Jer. 7:12). Then it came upon the house at Jerusalem too. God said, "Therefore I will do to the house that is called by My Name, and in which you trust, and to the place that I gave to you and to your fathers, as I did to Shiloh" (v. 14). And so it happened. Likewise the apostle Peter tells us, "It is time for judgment to begin at the household of God" (1 Peter 4:17).

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Place — God sends His word to the temple gate, so the people most sure of their standing hear it first.

- People — the hearers are worshippers walking in, not outsiders. God aims the word at religious people.

- Pretence — walking through the gates while living another way covers nothing. It makes the case worse.

- Plea — God wants reality. Grace never weakens His moral demands, and privilege is no defence for going on in sin.

- Penalty — Shiloh had already fallen, and judgment begins at the house that carries His Name.

Jeremiah 7:3 · Darby

Thus saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel Amend your ways and your doings, and I will cause you to dwell in this place.

God placed Jeremiah at the temple gate to speak to the crowds coming in to worship. His message was not about the building but about their conduct, and staying in the land depended on it.

Where the Message Was Delivered

The place of this message was itself part of it. God sent His prophet to the one spot where the nation felt most secure.

In chapter 2:1-2 he must go and cry out in the hearing of Jerusalem. In chapter 7:1-2 the test becomes harder. Now he must stand in the gate of the Lord's house and call every man of Judah who enters those gates to worship to hear the word of the Lord.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

What "Amend" Asks For

The word for "amend" means to put things back in working order. It is not about tidying the surface.

The Greek word comes from a verb meaning 'to amend, make right.' So we get the 'time of reformation,' or 'setting things right.' The prophets raised this thought, and the kingdom will fulfil it. It means putting things on earth in order according to the mind of God. Christianity looks forward to this. Heb. 9:10. The same Greek verb appears in the Greek Old Testament at Isa. 16:5; Isa. 62:7; Jer. 7:3, 5.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Confidence Being Attacked

The people had a defence ready. They had the building, and they repeated the fact three times over as though repetition made it a shield.

In Jeremiah 7 he begins a new theme. He takes up the temple itself, and shows that the flood of evil in Judah had polluted the very sanctuary of Jehovah. What is more, while they stood in danger, they were trusting not in God nor in His word. They trusted lying words of their own: that the outward forms would be enough to hold back the Gentile power that was destroying them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel had leaned on a sacred object once before, and it did not save them.

It is very sad when God's people trust the symbols of God's presence instead of God Himself… They trusted in the temple, not in God. If they had trusted Him, their ways would have matched that faith… The presence of the ark did not save Israel, and neither did the presence of the temple. Their ways did not please the God they claimed to serve.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Mercy Never Cancels God's Moral Ways

Some treat a call to amend as a threat to grace. This writer says the opposite. Grace is the power that makes God's ways precious to us.

God must have reality in His people. Grace was never meant to weaken the moral ways of God, and it never can be allowed to. In fact, grace is the only source of power that makes those ways precious to us and gives us firmness in walking by them… There is no more destructive trap than pleading that privilege while you sin and keep on sinning. God's righteous government of His people is as certain as the mercy that chose and blessed them. Let them forget neither!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two Ways to Approach God — and One That Is Fatal

There is a real difference between coming to God broken over sin and coming to Him with a clear conscience. Both are welcome. A third posture is not.

There are two different conditions in which we may call on God. We may call on Him in deep sorrow over our sin, and He hears us. Or we may call on Him with a good conscience and a heart that does not condemn us, and He hears us… Both stand in sharp contrast to the indifference and hardness of heart that would dare to count on God while living in open disobedience and in unrighteousness day by day… To imagine that we can trust God while our feet walk the path of sin is nothing less than shocking contempt for God.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

An Offer, Not Yet a Sentence

The "and I will" of this verse makes the whole message an open door. Judgment was announced, but it had not closed.

Jeremiah's prophecies are more conditional than any other, except Jonah's. In fact they state their condition even more plainly than Jonah's did. Jonah did not put the condition into words: "If you repent, God will spare Nineveh." But Jeremiah does state it: "If you repent, Jehovah will turn back from what He means to do."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Same Delusion Since

The error did not die with Judah. The same reasoning appears wherever a religious body claims it cannot fail.

People claim they are safe most loudly when they pay least attention to God's sovereign grace and to their own duty to bear true witness to Him. The Jew told himself that the temple must stand by God's power, whatever the people were like. So Christendom, fallen and still falling, made claims that matched how far it had sunk: that it can never fail and never err, though that belongs to God alone.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Place. God sent the message to the temple gate, to people walking in to worship at the height of their confidence.

- Word. "Amend" means setting things right according to the mind of God. It is not repair work on appearances.

- Trust. They trusted a symbol of God's presence instead of God Himself, and their ways proved it.

- Reality. God must have reality in His people; His righteous government is as certain as the mercy that chose them.

- Offer. God states the condition openly. Turn, and He will turn from the judgment He has declared. The same false confidence returns wherever people claim their group cannot fail.

Jeremiah 7:4 · Darby

Confide ye not in words of falsehood, saying, Jehovah's temple, Jehovah's temple, Jehovah's temple is this.

Crowds stream through the temple gates to worship, and what Jeremiah confronts there is not open unbelief but a slogan — a phrase repeated three times, as if the building itself guaranteed safety. The question is whether a people can claim God's presence while their conduct denies Him.

The words they trusted

Judah was in real danger. Jeremiah names where their confidence had settled: not in God or His word, but in a formula of their own making.

In Jeremiah 7 the prophet begins on a new theme. He takes up the temple itself. He shows that the tide of evil in Judah had completely polluted the very sanctuary of the LORD. In the middle of their danger, they were not trusting God or His word. They were trusting lying words of their own: that the outward forms would be defence enough against the destroying Gentile power.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the slogan was meant to do

They used the repeated phrase like a charm. They treated the building as a shield: whatever happened outside its walls, disaster could not reach them.

Their worship was only external. They trusted in the temple of the Lord, as if the house itself carried some kind of blessing and would shield them from disaster. Micah describes the same delusion in the apostate people: "Yet they lean on the LORD and say, 'Is not the LORD in the midst of us? No disaster shall come upon us'" (Micah 3:11). They trusted in lying words. They were thieves, murderers, adulterers, perjurers and idolaters. They thought that going to the house of the LORD would deliver them from these abominations.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Words in place of reality

The temple was God's house, so the words themselves were true. The problem was what the worshippers made of them.

A hypocritical group may "enter these gates to worship the LORD," trusting in deceptive words — "This is the temple of the LORD" (Jer. 7:4). But such sayings did not take the place of inward reality before God. It only made their case worse.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What God asked for instead

God's answer is not a better slogan but a set of terms. Privilege never covers sin, and mercy never suspends the way God governs His people.

God must have reality in His people. Grace was never meant to weaken the moral ways of God, and it never can. In fact, grace is the only spring of power that makes those ways precious to us and gives us firmness in walking in them. No snare is more destructive than the idea that people who sin, and go on sinning, can plead their privilege. God's righteous government of His people is as certain as the mercy which chose and blessed them: let them forget neither! "For if you truly amend your ways and your deeds, if you truly execute justice one with another, if you do not oppress the sojourner, the fatherless, or the widow ... then I will let you dwell in this place."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Shiloh: the argument already answered

God does not just contradict the boast. He points to a ruin. Shiloh was where God's tent among Israel first stood, and its rubble answered anyone who thought a holy place was safe forever.

How empty and foolish the idea, that God would keep His seat where His people insulted Him to His face! "Go now to my place that was in Shiloh, where I made my name dwell at first, and see what I did to it because of the evil of my people Israel."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same confidence, repeated

The same mistake did not end with Judah. What ruined them was not the truth they quoted but the use they made of it.

That would be exactly what they did in Jeremiah's time, when judgment was coming, and it is what Christendom is doing now. They said, "This is the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD," and, "the law shall not perish from the priest, nor counsel from the wise" — while they were all on their way to Babylon. The faithfulness of God was unchanging. But the moment they used it to prop themselves up in a place of evil, it became the very ground of their ruin.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Trust misplaced. The danger was not that they trusted, but what they trusted — a phrase about God's house instead of God and His word.

- Trust unmasked. God calls them lying words. The building never gave the protection they claimed, and saying it three times added nothing.

- Trust tested. God gives terms instead: change your ways, do justice, and stop oppressing the foreigner, the fatherless and the widow.

- Trust judged. Shiloh already stood in ruins as proof that God does not stay where His people insult Him to His face.

- Trust today. Use a true thing about God to shelter your evil, and it stops being your security. It becomes the ground of your ruin.

Jeremiah 7:5 · Darby

But if ye thoroughly amend your ways and your doings, if ye really do justice between a man and his neighbour,

Judah trusted the temple to keep them safe. This verse is God's answer — an "if" that ties their future in the land to how they live and how they treat each other.

The Word "Amend"

One reference work traces the word behind "amend" from this verse into the New Testament.

The word is diorthosis, from 'to amend, make right.' So we get the 'time of reformation,' or 'setting things right.' The prophets take up this thought, and the kingdom will fulfil it. It points to the setting in order of things on earth according to the mind of God. Christianity looks on to this and awaits it. Hebrews 9:10. The Greek verb occurs in the Greek Old Testament in Isaiah 16:5; Isaiah 62:7; Jeremiah 7:3, 5.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

What the "If" Is Answering

One writer describes what had gone wrong when Jeremiah spoke these words.

In Jeremiah 7 he starts a new theme. He takes up the temple itself. He shows that the flood of evil in Judah had completely polluted the very sanctuary of the Lord. What is more, they were in danger, yet they were not trusting in God or in His word. They trusted lying words of their own — that the outward forms would hold off the foreign power that was destroying them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Grace and Government Together

The same writer draws out why God attaches an "if" at all.

God must have reality in His people. Grace was never meant to weaken the moral ways of God, and it never can be allowed to. In fact, grace is the one spring of power that makes those ways precious to us and gives us firmness in walking in them. God shows grace to a soul. Even when that soul values it only a little, that grace bears the fruit of righteousness in everyday life between people, as surely as it sets everything right toward God. No trap is more destructive than pleading privilege while sinning and going on in it. God's righteous government of His people is as certain as the mercy that chose and blessed them: let them forget neither! Nearness to God, even outwardly, is a reason for more watchful holiness, never for indifference.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Justice Between Neighbours

What does justice between neighbours actually require? One writer lists the specifics.

Notice what the Lord called His people back to in the days of their prosperity. It was the second table of the law — love to their neighbours. It is love to their neighbour, measured by the love they have for themselves. So He called them to do true judgment and to show no favouritism. He called them to have a tender and compassionate heart. He called them to keep from oppressing the helpless, the widow, the fatherless, the stranger, and the poor. All this shows the value God attaches to our practical conduct, and to a way of life with others shaped and ordered by His word.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Right Position, Loose Practice

The conditions are practical, so being on correct ground proves nothing by itself.

See how strongly this shows that a testimony which looks right on the outside is no security for us. It may even become a great trap to us in our practical life. The satisfaction of holding a position separate from the world may feed our spiritual pride. It can make us pass lightly over our moral looseness in our relationships with our brothers.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

Confession and Righteousness Are Not the Same

A failure honestly owned and a life honestly lived are two different things, and neither one may be swapped for the other.

We must not confuse the confession of sin, and the pardon of it, with practical righteousness. There are two distinct conditions in which we may call on God. We may call on Him in deep sorrow of heart, and He hears us. Or we may call on Him with a good conscience and an unaccusing heart, and He hears us. But the two things are very distinct. And they both stand in sharp contrast with something else: the indifference and hardness of heart that would dare to count on God while openly disobeying Him and living in practical unrighteousness.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Command — "Amend" means to make right. It is the word for setting things in order according to the mind of God — the same setting right that the kingdom will bring.

- Condition — Staying in the land hangs on an "if." God governs His people as surely as He shows them mercy.

- Conduct — The test God names is the second table of the law: true judgment, no favouritism, no oppression of the helpless. Grace bears fruit between people, not only toward God.

- Counterfeit — A correct outward position gives no security. It can even feed pride and make moral looseness easy to overlook.

- Contrast — Pardon for confessed sin and a righteous daily walk are two different things. Neither replaces the other. To claim God's favour while walking in wrong is neither one.

Jeremiah 7:6 · Darby

[if] ye oppress not the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, and shed no innocent blood in this place, neither walk after other gods to your hurt;

Commentary for this verse has not been generated yet.

Jeremiah 7:7 · Darby

then will I cause you to dwell in this place, in the land that I gave to your fathers from of old even for ever.

God sends Jeremiah to the temple gate to speak to the crowds coming in to worship. There He offers them a place to stay — but the offer hangs on conditions, and that raises a simple question: what keeps a people safe in their land, their building or their behaviour?

The false confidence the promise is aimed at

The people trusted their own words. They treated the temple building as a shield against an invading army.

In Jeremiah 7 he begins a new message. He takes up the temple itself, and shows that the tide of evil in Judah had completely polluted the very sanctuary of the LORD. And while they were in danger, they were trusting not in God nor in His word, but in lying words of their own. They thought the outward forms would be enough to hold back the destroying foreign power.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Israel had made the same mistake before, with the ark.

It is very sad when God's people put their trust in the symbols of God's presence rather than in God Himself. It happened in the days of the ark, and again just before the king of Babylon took Judah captive. Back then, the people thought they were perfectly safe because the ark was in the camp. Later they thought the enemy could not overthrow them because they had the temple in Jerusalem. They trusted in the temple, not in God — otherwise their ways would have matched their faith in Him.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Conditions about the neighbour

God lists His conditions first: fair judgment, no oppression of the stranger, the fatherless or the widow, no innocent blood. These are duties toward people, not rituals.

It is the second table of the law — love to their neighbours — to which the Lord had recalled the attention of His people. He had called them to carry out true judgment and to show no favouritism. They were to have a tender and compassionate heart. They were to keep from oppressing the helpless, the widow, the fatherless, the stranger, and the poor. All this shows the value God attaches to our practical conduct, to a walk in relation to others as formed and ordered by His word.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Why the promise carries an "if"

"Then I will let you dwell" is God's government at work. Mercy chose this people; that does not cancel the moral conditions of staying.

God must have reality in His people. Grace was never meant to weaken the moral ways of God, and we must never let it. Grace is the one power that makes those ways precious in our eyes and gives us firmness in walking in them. No snare destroys more than this: people who sin and keep on sinning pleading their privilege. God's righteous government of His people is as certain as the mercy which chose and blessed them: let them forget neither!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The "if" governed life in the land. One writer marks off how this differs for Christians.

If the people honoured the Lord by submitting to His word, He would bless them in the land with temporal blessings, in keeping with the covenant they lived under. It is different with Christians. They are saved by pure unconditional grace. But once saved, their blessing and their enjoyment of spiritual blessing depend on their walk, on obedience to the Word. They do not obey to be saved.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Two honest ways to come to God — and one dishonest one

Judah wanted a third option: keep the sin and keep the confidence. Scripture leaves only two doors open.

There are two distinct conditions in which we may call upon God. We may call on Him in deep sorrow over sin, and He hears us. Or we may call on Him with a good conscience and a heart that does not accuse us, and He hears us. The two are very different. Both stand in sharp contrast with the indifference and hard heart that counts on God while openly disobeying Him and living in unrighteousness. Practical righteousness He owns and approves. Confessed sin He can freely and fully pardon. But to think we can trust God while our feet walk the path of wickedness is nothing short of shocking irreverence.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same trust today

The same misplaced trust did not stop with Judah.

False trust in ordinances and outward worship is only too evident in the Christian world as well. Crowds of unsaved people keep up their religious observances and think this protects them and secures the Lord's help and blessing. The Lord calls on them to amend their ways and their doings, to work a better righteousness.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Words. Judah trusted lying words: outward forms treated as armour against an advancing army.

- Ways. The offer to remain turns on amended ways and doings, not on attendance at the house that bore God's name.

- Neighbour. The tests are neighbour-love: honest judgment, and no oppression of the stranger, the fatherless, or the widow.

- Dwelling. Mercy chose the nation; God's government decided whether it stayed in the land. Grace never loosens His moral ways.

- Warning. Trusting a building while living in sin is the one road to God that Scripture closes. Religious people still repeat the mistake.

Jeremiah 7:8 · Darby

Behold, ye confide in words of falsehood that cannot profit.

God had told Judah to mend their ways and stop repeating a slogan about His temple. Now He names their confidence for what it is: deceptive words that cannot help them. Older translations read "lying words." Can religious privilege shelter a person whose life contradicts it?

What the Deceptive Words Were

The lie was not a denial of God. It was a claim about His house — that the building itself guaranteed safety.

Their worship was only external. They trusted in the temple of the Lord, as if the house itself carried a blessing and would shield them from disaster. Micah describes the same delusion in people who had turned away from God: "Yet they lean on the LORD and say, 'Is not the LORD in the midst of us? No disaster shall come upon us'" (Micah 3:11). Such a false trust in religious ceremonies and outward worship is only too clear in Christendom too.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

That confidence had teachers behind it.

Although the moral condition of the people was so low, God still waited in mercy, pleading with them to mend their ways and not to trust in lying words. The false prophets were telling them that things would be all right — as long as they had the temple of the Lord, judgment could not overtake them.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Life Behind the Slogan

The verses right after this one list what these worshippers were doing.

One verse convicts the people of breaking six of the ten commandments. They worshipped Baal and other idols, and at the same time they kept an outward form of relationship with the true God by standing before Him in His house. They were only a small remnant, whom God in His mercy had delivered from the enemy, and they seem to have thought He spared them so they could do their own will. They imagined that God did not notice their wicked ways, and that their formal recognition of His temple would satisfy Him.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Words that sound devout can make a bad situation worse rather than better.

A hypocritical crowd may "enter these gates to worship the LORD," trusting in deceptive words: "This is the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD…" (Jer. 7:4). But such sayings did not take the place of inward reality before God. It only made their case worse.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Why Privilege Cannot Profit

The words could not profit, because privilege gives no cover for ongoing sin. God chose His people, and God governs them.

God must have reality in His people. Grace was never meant to weaken God's moral ways, and it never can. In fact, grace is the only source of power that makes those ways precious to us and gives us firmness to walk in them… There is no more destructive snare than privilege pleaded by people who sin and go on sinning. God governs His people in righteousness, and that is as certain as the mercy that chose and blessed them. Let them forget neither!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Judah's mistake was not trusting God. It was trusting Him while walking the other way.

There are two distinct conditions in which we may call on God. We may call on Him in deep sorrow over sin, and He hears us. Or we may call on Him with a good conscience and an unaccusing heart, and He hears us. But the two are very different. And both stand in sharp contrast with the indifference and hardness of heart that would presume to count on God in the face of open disobedience and practical unrighteousness. This is dreadful in the sight of the Lord, and it must bring down His heavy judgment. Practical righteousness He owns and approves. Confessed sin He can freely and fully pardon. But to imagine that we can trust God while our feet walk the path of sin is nothing short of the most shocking irreverence toward Him.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The Same Trust, A Different Age

The same false confidence did not die with Judah.

He shows them that their boast in an unbroken succession of national privilege was an empty trust. The Jews held this false confidence just as strongly as others in Christendom ever have. The delusion was as destructive to them as it will be to Christendom. Nothing is more certain to bring destruction on Christendom than the idea of a security that cannot fail. I do not mean security for the soul, for the believer; that assurance is quite right.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What makes the mixture so dangerous is that it soothes rather than alarms.

The form suits the worldly heart, because it keeps the conscience at ease while the heart enjoys the world in all its attractiveness. What a delusion!… Satan's masterpiece is the blending of things that look Christian with things that are plainly unholy. He deceives more effectively with this scheme than with any other, so we need more spiritual perception to see it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- The lie — They trusted a slogan about God's house, as though the building itself would shield them from disaster.

- The shelter — They kept an outward link with God while breaking His commandments. They assumed a nod to His temple would satisfy Him.

- The cost — Pious sayings did not replace inward reality; they made the case worse, not better.

- The verdict — Privilege pleaded by those who go on sinning is the most destructive snare there is. God's government is as sure as His mercy.

- The repeat — Nothing is more certain to ruin Christendom than the idea of a security that cannot fail. Satan's masterpiece is Christian appearance blended with unholy living.

Jeremiah 7:9 · Darby

What? steal, murder, and commit adultery, and swear falsely, and burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other gods whom ye know not ...

God speaks these words to people on their way in to worship Him. It is a question, not a statement. He reads a list of crimes back to the worshippers, who still expected to be safe.

A charge sheet drawn from the Ten Commandments

The items are not random. They line up with the ten commandments, and the count is damning.

In one verse the people are found guilty of breaking six of the ten commandments. While they worshipped Baal and other idols, they kept up an outward relationship with the true God by standing before Him in His house. They were only what was left of the nation. God in His mercy had rescued these few from the enemy, and they clearly thought He had spared them so they could do as they pleased. They imagined, foolishly, that God did not notice their wicked ways, and that He would be satisfied with their formal respect for His temple.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Who the worshippers were

One writer describes these worshippers bluntly, and sees the same pattern wherever people treat religion as insurance.

Their worship was only outward. They trusted in the temple of the Lord, as if the building itself carried a blessing and would shield them from disaster… The same false trust in religious ceremony and outward worship is all too plain in the Christian world as well. Crowds of unsaved people think their religious routine protects them and secures the Lord's help and blessing. They trusted in lying words. They were thieves, murderers, adulterers, liars under oath and idol worshippers, and they thought that going to the house of the LORD would deliver them from these detestable deeds.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Incense to Baal — worship offered elsewhere

The list ends with incense burned to Baal and with following other gods. That is still worship, and one writer names who receives it.

The Bible also speaks often of burning incense to Baal and other false gods (Jer. 1:16; Jer. 7:9). Satan has his own incense and perfume, and he makes it a delight to those who willingly serve him.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Privilege raises the standard

The people's logic was that belonging to God covered them. One writer names that reasoning as the most dangerous trap of all, and turns it around.

God must have what is real in His people. Grace was never meant to weaken God's moral ways, and it never can be allowed to… There is no more destructive trap than this: that people who sin, and go on sinning, can plead their privilege. God rules His people in righteousness as surely as He chose and blessed them in mercy. Let them forget neither!… Being near to God, even outwardly, is a reason for more watchful holiness, never for indifference.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The warning of Shiloh

Their confidence rested on the temple building. The same writer answers that with the history of an earlier holy place.

Shiloh was the place where the tabernacle — the tent of worship — was first set up in the land. What was Shiloh now? God Himself had stripped it of its holiness, and He would do the very same thing where the ark now stood, in the sanctuary at Jerusalem. God cannot tie Himself to keeping up an empty form. He would no longer support what had been a beautiful picture of His truth, once the state of the people and the priests was, in His eyes, the most offensive evil under the sun. The greater the truth, the blessing, or at least the privileges God had given to the Jewish people and their priests, the greater the wickedness of their insults to His holiness in His own temple.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same mixture today

An outward form of religion still suits people who want to keep the world. One writer explains why that mixture is so hard to spot.

The outward form suits the worldly heart, because it keeps the conscience at ease while the heart enjoys the world in all its attraction. What a delusion!… Satan's masterpiece is the blending of things that look Christian with things that are plainly unholy. He deceives more successfully by this scheme than by any other, and so we need more spiritual insight to detect it.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

Summary

- Six — one verse charges the worshippers with breaking six of the ten commandments. They still stood in God's house as if all was well.

- Baal — the list ends with incense burned to a false god. They were still worshipping — they had only changed who received it.

- Form — their religion was outward. They trusted the building to shield them, and people still trust religious routine the same way.

- Privilege — nearness to God calls for more watchful holiness, never for indifference. Pleading privilege while going on in sin is the most destructive trap of all.

- Shiloh — God will not tie Himself to an empty form. The greater the privilege He gives, the greater the insult when people defy His holiness in His own house.

Jeremiah 7:10 · Darby

then ye come and stand before me, in this house which is called by my name, and say, We are delivered, -- in order to do all these abominations!

In Jeremiah's message the people step out of a list of crimes, walk into the temple, and tell God they are safe. The verse raises two questions: what makes a place "called by my name," and can nearness to God protect someone who means to keep sinning?

The false promise and the charge

One writer sets the scene: what the false prophets promised, and what the list of crimes in the previous verse adds up to.

God still waited in mercy, pleading with them to change their ways and not to trust in lying words. The false prophets were telling them that everything would be fine: as long as they had the temple of the Lord, judgment could not reach them… In one verse the people stand convicted of breaking six of the ten commandments. They worshipped Baal and other idols, and at the same time they kept an outward form of relationship with the true God by standing before Him in His house. They were only a remnant of the nation, a few whom God in His mercy had delivered from the hand of the enemy. It seems they thought God had spared them so they could do their own will. They wrongly imagined that God took no notice of their wicked ways, and that their formal recognition of His temple would satisfy Him.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

"Called by my name"

That title is narrower than it sounds. Very few buildings have ever carried it.

The house of God is the one that bears His holy Name, as He says, "which is called by My Name" (Jer. 7:10-11, 12, 14, 30). In Old Testament times you could say this of the tabernacle or the temple, but of no other such structure then or since.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Nearness raises the standard

The people treated their access to God as cover. One writer turns that reasoning around.

God must have reality in His people. God never meant grace to weaken His moral ways, and He will never allow it to… There is no more destructive snare than for people who sin and go on sinning to plead their privilege. God's righteous government of His people is as certain as the mercy that chose and blessed them. Let them forget neither! … Nearness to God, even outward nearness, is the ground for a more watchful holiness, never for indifference.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The plea "we are delivered"

There are honest ways to call on God, and there is presumption. These people claim God's protection while their feet stay on the road of sin.

There are two different conditions in which we may call on God. We may call on Him in deep sorrow for sin, and be heard. Or we may call on Him with a good conscience and a heart that does not condemn us, and be heard… Both stand in sharp contrast with the hardness of heart that would presume to count on God in the face of open disobedience and unrighteous living… Practical righteousness He owns and approves. Confessed sin He can freely and fully pardon. But to imagine that we can trust God while our feet walk the path of sin is nothing short of the most shocking irreverence.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The same excuse reappears wherever people admit the evil around them and then decide it cannot be helped.

It was a day too when they could boast, "The temple of the Lord are these" (Jer. 7:1-11), and yet add, "We are delivered to do all these abominations." How like the cry of some: we cannot help the evil, it is the best thing we can find, and so on.

Modernised from F G PattersonOriginal wording

Why the mixture is so dangerous

Standing in God's house while serving Baal is a blend, not open rebellion. That is what makes it hard to spot.

The form suits the worldly heart, because it keeps the conscience at ease while the heart enjoys the world in all its attractiveness. What a delusion!… Satan's masterpiece is the mixing of things that look Christian with things that are plainly unholy. He deceives more effectively by this scheme than by any other, and we need more spiritual discernment to detect it as a result.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

No immunity for God's house

God had already dealt with one site that carried His name. One writer follows that warning well past Jeremiah's day.

And what a solemn fact it is — judgment fell on the house that was in Shiloh, where the Lord set His Name at the first (Jer. 7:12); and it came again on the house at Jerusalem, as He said, "therefore I will do to the house that is called by my name, and in which you trust… as I did to Shiloh" (v. 14). And so it happened… "it is time for judgment to begin at the household of God" (1 Peter 4:17)… When the truth is falsified and true piety is gone, what can come but judgment from God? — and all the more so if this false thing bears His holy Name.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Privilege. God's name rested on one house on earth: the tabernacle, and then the temple. Nothing else could claim that title.

- Presumption. False prophets told them the temple kept them safe. So they broke six of the ten commandments, then stood before God in that house, sure He took no notice.

- Pretence. Trusting God while walking in sin is shocking irreverence. Mixing things that look Christian with things that are plainly unholy is Satan's masterpiece: it keeps the conscience comfortable.

- Precedent. God judged Shiloh first. A house that carries His name is more exposed to judgment, not less, once the truth in it is falsified.

- Practice. God must have reality in His people. Nearness to Him, even outward nearness, calls for more watchful holiness, never for indifference.

Jeremiah 7:11 · Darby

Is this house, which is called by my name, a den of robbers in your eyes? Even I, behold, I have seen it, saith Jehovah.

The prophet turns to a crowd that leans on the temple building and asks what it has become in their eyes. The warning is plain: people can hide sin behind a place that carries God's name, and God says He has seen it.

The house that carries God's name

The verse turns on the phrase "which is called by my name."

The house of God is what bears His holy name, as He says, "which is called by My name" (Jer. 7:10-11, 12, 14, 30). In Old Testament times you could say this of the tabernacle or the temple, but of no other building then or since.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Two lives at once

The question targets people whose religion and behaviour point in opposite directions.

In chapter 7 the prophet exposes the double life of the people. On one hand they spoke of "the temple of the Lord" as their possession. They never failed to stand before the Lord in "this house which is called by My name." They even thought God had delivered them so that they could carry on in their abominations (v. 10). They had every appearance of godliness. They even gathered in the place God had chosen. But what about their actual behaviour? How much injustice, oppression and idolatry? Their actions contradicted what they claimed, so judgment would come on them and on their temple.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

A den: where wrongdoers feel safe

A den is a hideout. That is what the temple had become in their thinking.

Their worship was only external. They trusted in the temple of the Lord, as if the house itself carried a blessing and would shield them from disaster. Such false trust in ceremonies and outward worship is only too clear in the Christian world as well. Masses of unsaved people with their religious routines think this protects them and secures the Lord's help and blessing. They trusted in lying words. They were thieves, murderers, adulterers, liars under oath and idolaters. They thought that going to the house of the LORD would save them from these abominations. The Lord calls on them to amend their ways and their doings… They had made His house a den of robbers.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"I myself have seen it"

God ends the verse by saying He has seen it Himself. Privilege raises the standard; it never lowers it.

God must have reality in His people. Grace was never meant to weaken the moral ways of God, and it never can… There is no more destructive trap than for people who sin, and go on sinning, to plead their privilege. God rules His people in righteousness as surely as His mercy chose and blessed them. Let them forget neither! … Being near to God, even in outward form, is a reason for more watchful holiness, never for indifference.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Shiloh had already answered the question

The people assumed God had to defend His own house. Shiloh, where the tabernacle first stood in the land, says otherwise.

What was Shiloh now? God had profaned it, and God would do the very same thing where the ark was now placed, where the sanctuary was in Jerusalem. It is impossible for God to bind Himself to maintain an empty form. He would no longer sustain what was a beautiful picture of His truth. In His eyes, the state of the people and of the priests was the most offensive evil under the sun. God had granted the Jewish people and their priests greater truth and blessing, or at least greater privileges. That made their insults to His holiness in His own temple all the more wicked.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

From den of robbers to place of healing

Later, the Lord Himself came into that temple and dealt with what He found.

They had refused to change their ways and their deeds. They had refused to judge justly between a man and his neighbour. They had gone on oppressing the stranger, the fatherless and the widow. They had trusted in lying words while keeping up every outward form of religion. They came into the house of God as if it belonged to them, with hearts full of greed… Then, at this extreme of evil, the Lord comes in. He casts out all who sold and bought. He makes what had been a den of robbers a place of healing and blessing. But this only brings out a more determined rejection of Him and the salvation He brought.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Summary

- Named — The house is "called by my name." That name is what makes its misuse serious, not the stonework.

- Misused — In their eyes it was a hideout. They ran to it and kept on stealing, murdering and serving other gods.

- Seen — God's closing "I myself have seen it" removes the cover. Nearness to God calls for more watchfulness, never less.

- Warned — Shiloh already proved God will not prop up an empty form. Greater privilege only makes the insult worse.

- Answered — The Lord came into that temple, drove out the traders, and made the den of robbers a place of healing. They rejected Him for it.

Jeremiah 7:12 · Darby

For go now unto my place which was in Shiloh, where I caused my name to dwell at the first, and see what I did to it, for the wickedness of my people Israel.

God sends Jeremiah to people who felt safe because His temple stood in their city. His answer to them is a journey: go to Shiloh, look at the ruins of the first place He put His name, and ask why they are ruins.

The place where the name was first set

Shiloh was where the tabernacle — God's tent among Israel — stood after they entered the land. One writer draws out what that nearness demanded, and what the ruins now say.

His Name demanded holiness in them and obedience from them. It demanded practical godliness, and a national life He could smile upon. How Israel's history comments on Israel's disobedience! The ruins of Shiloh show Jehovah's unchanging holiness. Their desolation is a powerful witness to God's displeasure when people depart from Him. Yet the ark stayed there for more than three hundred and fifty years. Every one of those years declares the Lord's great patience with His rebellious people!

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

Corruption among the priests

The wickedness the verse names was not only among the people. It reached the priests who served at that very spot.

Shiloh was the place where God had put His name; but what was the end of it? A witness of judgment to all generations… Under the priesthood there was complete corruption, even in the priests. We see it in 1 Samuel 2, and in the moving scene of chapter 3, which marked Ichabod on the people of God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

("Ichabod" means "the glory has departed" — the name given when enemies captured the ark.)

No guarantee for an empty form

Judah assumed the temple tied God's hands: He had chosen it, so He must defend it. Shiloh answers that.

Shiloh was the place where the tabernacle first stood in the land. What was Shiloh now? God had profaned it: and God would do the very same thing where the ark was now placed, where the sanctuary was in Jerusalem. It is impossible that God should bind Himself to maintain an empty form. He would no longer sustain what was a beautiful picture of His truth. In His eyes, the state of the people and of the priests was the most offensive evil under the sun. The greater the truth, the blessing, or at least the privileges, He had granted to the Jewish people and their priests, the greater the wickedness of their insults to His holiness in His own temple.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same writer notes the reversal this produced: the building they leaned on became the target the invader wanted most.

The temple was not their strong fortress against the judgments of the king of Babylon. Far from it: the temple would be the main point on which all these judgments would converge. And if the king of Babylon destroyed the city of Jerusalem as a whole, the sanctuary would suffer most of all.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why people cling harder to old things

There is a pattern here. It explains why the chant "the temple of the Lord" rose loudest when behaviour was worst.

The most ancient relations with God serve no good purpose when man puts his trust in them. When he is far from God, he attaches himself to the old things that God set up, so as to reject what God may be giving now… God had established the altar, temple, sacrifices, feasts, and priests. But when wickedness is there, judgment must begin with His house… Those who say, "The temple of Jehovah, the temple of Jehovah are these," are not the ones occupied with the Lord of the temple. The more evil the conscience is, the more it attaches itself to forms.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same warning today

What fell at Shiloh fell again at Jerusalem. One writer traces the same rule into our own day.

Peter tells us, "Judgment must begin at the house of God." We see it in the symbolic history of the churches in Revelation 2 and 3. God will judge corrupt Christendom no less than He judged corrupt Judaism… When the truth is falsified and true piety is gone, what can come but judgment from God? — and all the more so if this false thing bears His holy Name.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

From ruin to the second Man

Shiloh stood in the territory of Ephraim. But losing the sanctuary was not the end of the story.

The failure of the tribe moved the place of God's sanctuary out of the territory of Ephraim, where it had been, and it settled at last in the inheritance of Judah, at Jerusalem… Here we see the truth found everywhere in Scripture. When the first man fails, and everything entrusted to him falls into ruin, God comes in and brings in Christ, "the second Man." Under His headship, and in His hands, everything is secured beyond change.

Modernised from C KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Name — Shiloh was where God first made His name dwell in the land. That nearness demanded holiness, obedience and real godliness.

- Ruin — The corruption reached even the priests. The place God had chosen became a witness of judgment to every generation after.

- Reality — God will not bind Himself to maintain an empty form. The greater the privilege, the greater the offence of insulting His holiness in His own house.

- Forms — The further a conscience drifts, the tighter it grips old forms. Those who chant "the temple of the Lord" are not the ones occupied with the Lord of the temple.

- Christ — Judgment begins at God's house, then and now. But the first man fails, and all he was trusted with falls into ruin. Then God brings in the second Man, and in His hands everything is secure.

Jeremiah 7:13 · Darby

And now, because ye have done all these works, saith Jehovah, and I spoke unto you, rising up early and speaking, and ye heard not, and I called you, and ye answered not;

God says this to people who felt safe because they had His temple. He answers that false security with a fact they could not deny. He had spoken to them again and again, and they never listened or answered.

The Form Was No Shelter

The chapter builds its case on the ruin of Shiloh, where God's tent, the tabernacle, once stood. One commentator asks what its fate says about any sacred building:

Shiloh was the place where Israel first set up the tabernacle in the land (verse 12). What was Shiloh now? God had profaned it. He would do the very same thing in Jerusalem, where the ark and the sanctuary now stood. It is impossible that God should bind Himself to maintain an empty form. He would no longer sustain what was a beautiful picture of His truth. In His eyes, the state of the people and of the priests was the most offensive evil under the sun.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Rising Up Early

Where the ESV says God spoke "persistently," older translations read "rising up early." That phrase runs through the whole book. One writer counted the repetitions and read them as a window into what God felt:

One feature of this book shows the intensity of feeling that filled the Lord's heart for His people and city. Strong expressions come over and over again. In His concern for their good He speaks of "rising up early" to speak to them, time after time — eleven times at least! How this speaks of the Lord's intense love for them! No wonder He wept over Jerusalem! "They have forsaken Me!" "They have forgotten Me!" "They have turned their backs on Me!" He says again and again. This shows how He felt their treatment, and the bitter suffering they were bringing on themselves.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Two Kinds Of Early Rising

Zephaniah uses the same phrase, but of the people instead of God:

"I said, Surely you will fear Me, you will accept instruction; so that your dwelling would not be cut off, however I punished them. But they rose early and corrupted all their deeds." The LORD rose early to send them messages and warnings. They rose early to indulge in their wickedness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Speaking Until There Was No Remedy

God kept calling long after Jeremiah. One writer traces that line of renewed testimony to its end:

In His goodness, God has renewed His testimony again and again. In His patience He has sent His prophets, rising up early, as it is said, to send them until there was no remedy (see Jer. 7). Last of all, He sent His own Son. The result, as we have already said, is that all the righteous blood, from Abel to Zechariah, came upon one generation. By rejecting God's last witness, they filled up the measure of their fathers' guilt.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What God Held Back For Later

So much speaking, and no answer. One writer explains why the prophetic word alone could never secure a heart:

"I spoke to you," He said to His people, "rising up early and speaking, but you did not hear; and I called you, but you did not answer" (Jer. 7:13)… God never left Himself without a witness on earth. But Israel's sad history of backsliding proved one thing beyond question. To secure men for Himself, God needed something other than the prophetic word, or even the ministry of angels. God knew what was needed from the beginning… He would reveal Himself as Father. That revelation would secure a true and steadfast response in the hearts of men.

Modernised from J. T. MawsonOriginal wording

A House Called By His Name

The threat falls on the building because it carries His name. The same principle reaches past Jerusalem:

Likewise the apostle Peter tells us, "Judgment must begin at the household of God" (1 Peter 4:17)… God will judge corrupt Christendom no less than He judged corrupt Judaism… When people falsify the truth and true godliness is gone, what can come but judgment from God? This is all the more true if this false thing bears His holy name.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Summary

- He spoke. God's complaint is not silence but disregard. He rose up early to speak, and the repeated phrase shows how much He cared.

- They rose too. He rose early with warnings. They rose early to corrupt their deeds — the same energy, in the opposite direction.

- No shelter. Shiloh proved God will not prop up an empty form. A building with His name on it protects no one whose life insults Him.

- No remedy. The prophets kept coming until only His Son was left to send. Patience has an end, and rejecting the last witness fills up the account.

- Still speaking. The prophetic word never won the heart. So God kept something in reserve — to reveal Himself as Father, and win the answer no warning could.

Jeremiah 7:14 · Darby

I will even do unto the house which is called by my name, wherein ye trust, and unto the place which I gave to you and to your fathers, as I have done to Shiloh;

Judah kept coming to the temple to worship while their lives were full of wickedness. God answers their confidence in the building by pointing to a ruin they could go and see.

The house that bears His name

The verse calls the temple "the house that is called by my name." That phrase runs through the whole chapter.

The house of God is what bears His holy Name, as He says, "which is called by My Name" (Jer. 7:10-11, 12, 14, 30). In Old Testament times this could be said of either the Tabernacle or the Temple, but of no other such structure then or since. Both are mentioned here (vv. 1-11, 12-14).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The trust that God condemns

"In which you trust" is God's own description of what they were doing. The habit was old, passed from parents to children.

Just as their fathers had put their confidence in the ark rather than in Jehovah, so their children trusted in the temple rather than in Him whose Name the temple bore. Because of the wickedness of His people, for the honour of His holy Name, God must bring His judgment on them and on His house.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Their reasoning assumed that God would stay put no matter how they behaved in front of Him.

God stoops to reason with His people, in spite of how coarse they are. He points them to Shiloh, where the tent of meeting was first set up. How empty and foolish the notion, that God would keep His seat where His people insulted Him to His face!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Shiloh: the precedent already on record

God does not argue from theory. Shiloh was the first place He chose for His name, and the ruins were still there to see.

Jehovah's changeless holiness is written on the ruins of Shiloh. Its desolation is a powerful witness to God's displeasure against turning away from Himself... Yet each of the three hundred and fifty years and more that the ark remained there declares the Lord's great patience with His rebellious people! God will always keep His truth, but He has made His saints the caretakers of it; if, then, His people dishonour Him, He will scatter them, and they will lose their place of trust.

Modernised from H Forbes WitherbyOriginal wording

What happened there was not a local accident but a lasting lesson.

Shiloh was the place where God had put His name; but what was the end of it? A witness of judgment to all generations. Under the priesthood there was complete corruption, even among the priests.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Gift, not guarantee

God gave them the house, and He gave them the land. They took that long run of favour as proof that nothing could go wrong.

Their boast in an unbroken succession of national privilege was a false trust... There is nothing more certain to bring destruction on Christendom than the idea of a security that cannot fail. I do not mean security for the soul, for the believer. That assurance is quite right. We cannot hold too strongly to the eternal life of the believer. But some apply to the state of Christendom the idea that it will go on for ever, when God has warned us in His word that Christendom will fall just like the Jewish state before it. To think that way is to be caught by the tricks of the wicked one.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same delusion today

The same mistake did not end with Judah.

They trusted in the temple of the Lord, as if some kind of blessing were attached to the house itself and the house would shield them from disaster... Such a false trust in ordinances and outward worship is only too obvious in Christendom also. The masses of unsaved people with their religious observances think it is a protection and secures the Lord's help and blessing.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The line of judgment does not stop at Jerusalem.

Judgment fell on the house "that was in Shiloh," where the Lord made His name dwell at first (Jer. 7:12); then it came on the house at Jerusalem... And so it happened. In the same way the apostle Peter tells us, "It is time for judgment to begin at the household of God" (1 Peter 4:17)... Corrupt Christendom will be judged no less than corrupt Judaism was... When the truth is falsified and true godliness is gone, what can come but judgment from God? — and all the more so, if this false thing bears His holy Name.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Name. The temple was holy only because God's name was on it. That name marked out two buildings in Israel's history and no others.

- Trust. The name became their excuse. One generation leaned on the ark, the next on the building. Neither leaned on God.

- Shiloh. God points to a place they could walk to. Shiloh saw over three centuries of His patience, then ruin. The rubble still shows His holiness.

- Gift. God gave them the house and the land, and He could take both back. A long run of privilege is no promise that it will last.

- Warning. The name they hid behind is the reason judgment reaches them first. God judges His own house first, not last.

Jeremiah 7:15 · Darby

and I will cast you out of my sight, as I have cast out all your brethren, all the seed of Ephraim.

Jeremiah's temple sermon ends with the sentence itself: God will drive the crowd in His house out of His presence, as He drove out their northern relatives, "the offspring of Ephraim." So can a holy building and a long record of privilege protect people whose lives deny them?

The Lesson of Shiloh

Before naming Ephraim, God pointed back to Shiloh. It was the first place in the land where the tabernacle stood, and God had abandoned it.

This is exactly the moral of Jeremiah 7. The prophet takes as his text, so to speak, that Shiloh had lost its prestige. Shiloh was the place where the tabernacle was originally set up in the land (verse 12). What was Shiloh now? God had profaned it, and God would do the very same thing where the ark was now placed, where the sanctuary was in Jerusalem. It is impossible that God should bind Himself to maintain an empty form. He would no longer sustain what was a beautiful picture of His truth. In His eyes the state of the people and of the priests was the most offensive evil under the sun. God had given the Jewish people and their priests great truth and blessing, or at least great privileges. That made their insults to His holiness in His own temple all the more wicked.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Ephraim, the Sentence Already Carried Out

"Your kinsmen" were not distant strangers. Assyria had already carried the ten northern tribes away, and Scripture records that removal in the same words Jeremiah now uses of Judah.

In 2 Kings 17 God sums up the whole situation of Israel. For 260 years the ten tribes lived as a separate nation under nineteen kings, all evil. Then the LORD gave them up to the Assyrian oppressor. "Therefore the LORD was very angry with Israel and removed them out of his sight. None was left but the tribe of Judah only" (verse 18). Judah learned no lesson from the ruin of their brothers. The LORD bore with their evil ways for 130 years more. In the end He gave them into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar. "Judah also did not keep the commandments of the LORD their God… And the LORD rejected all the descendants of Israel… until he had cast them out of his sight" (verses 19-20).

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Why People Cling to the Building

The threat landed on people who were sure it never could, because they had the temple. That confidence has a cause.

But we see here that the most ancient relations with God serve no good purpose when a man puts his trust in them. When he is far from God, he attaches himself to the old things that God set up, so as to reject what God may actually be giving. But no one can deceive God about right and wrong… God had established the altar, temple, sacrifices, feasts and priests. But when wickedness is there, judgment must begin with His house. That judgment is only the more terrible if the effects of the Holy Spirit are not there. The only result of being outwardly near to God is a more unsparing judgment. Again, the more Christendom departs from truth and righteousness, the more it rests on institutions as being of God. … The more evil the conscience is, the more it attaches itself to forms.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Same Principle, Twice Proved

Shiloh fell, then Jerusalem fell. Commentators carry that pattern forward to our own day.

And what a solemn fact it is — judgment fell on the house "which was in Shiloh," where the Lord set His "name at the first" (Jer. 7:12); then it came on the house at Jerusalem, just as He said it would (v. 14). And so it happened. In the same way the apostle Peter tells us, "judgment must begin at the household of God" (1 Peter 4:17). We see it in the symbolic history of the churches in Revelation 2 and 3. Corrupt Christendom will be judged no less than corrupt Judaism was.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The Sanctuary Moves to Judah

Ephraim's fall was not the end of the story. What Ephraim lost passed to another tribe and another place.

Jacob gave Ephraim the place of firstborn over his brother Manasseh — the place of privilege. But the tribe failed, and so the place of God's sanctuary left the territory of Ephraim where it had been. It settled at last in the inheritance of Judah, at Jerusalem. "Our Lord was descended from Judah." Here we see a truth found everywhere in Scripture. When the first man fails, and everything entrusted to him falls into ruin, God comes in and brings in Christ, "the second Man." Under His headship and in His hands everything is held secure, beyond all change.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

Summary

- Privilege. Nearness to God raises the standard. The greater the blessing, the greater the guilt of insulting Him inside His own house.

- Precedent. Shiloh proves God will not maintain an empty form. He once set His name there and then abandoned it.

- Pattern. God cast Ephraim out of His sight. Judah refused to read the warning, and the same sentence fell on them.

- Presumption. A drifting conscience clings hardest to forms. Being near God on the outside, with the heart far away, makes the judgment harsher, not lighter.

- Purpose. When the first man ruins everything trusted to him, God brings in Christ, the second Man. His hands hold everything secure.

Jeremiah 7:16 · Darby

And thou, pray not for this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, and make not intercession to me; for I will not hear thee.

God stops Jeremiah in the middle of his work as a prophet — not from preaching, but from praying. The command raises a hard question. What has a people done when God tells His own servant He will not listen for them?

The false shelter of the temple

God told Jeremiah to give this message in the gate of the temple. The people there had built their confidence on the building itself.

Their worship was only external. They trusted in the temple of the Lord, as if the house itself carried a blessing and would shield them from disaster... The same false trust in religious forms and outward worship is only too clear in the Christian world too. Crowds of unsaved people keep up their religious observances. They think this protects them and guarantees the Lord's help and blessing.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What they were doing while they worshipped

Their offerings continued. So did something else, and it ran through the whole household.

God still waited in patience. But the dreadful state of Israel made His sentence of judgment unchangeable. Earlier in the chapter God had called on them to amend their ways. He promised that they would still live in the land if they obeyed His voice. Now He says, "do not pray for this people... for I will not hear you." Children, fathers and women were all united in a common effort "to pour out drink offerings to the queen of heaven," engaged in gross idolatry, though still offering sacrifices in the temple. But God desired obedience, not sacrifice, even as He had told king Saul so long before.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

"I will not hear you"

The refusal is startling because of who speaks it, and because of what He had said to the same nation before.

The Lord told the prophet that He would answer no prayer of intercession. "I will not hear you." What a word this is, coming from Him who had told Israel to cry to Him and He would answer. They had provoked Him by making cakes to the queen of heaven.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Intercession has a closing time

Jeremiah had stood in the gap for this people, and their reproaches fell on him while he did it. The command marks a limit, not a change in God's patience.

Let us remember that the Lord is "slow to anger." Outrageous provocations were going on, and poor Jeremiah was himself the target of much of them, since the reproaches meant for the Lord fell on him. Still he could appeal to God, telling how he had stood in the gap to turn away the anger from them. Then the Lord said to him, "do not pray for this people," and the anger took its course. For the one who has the mind of God, intercession is always the place to make a way for God's love — until that place is closed.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

God gives the same command again later in the book. One writer asks what it cost the man who loved this people — and what it cost God.

This, to one who loved the people of God, was in every way a trial: what was it to Him who loves as only God can love? Yet it remains true. There are times when the principle applies, and faith must find it out and act on it, whatever the accusation of being unloving.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Government alongside grace

Two truths about God stand together here.

The government of God is as real as the grace of God. In the exercise of government "He can by no means clear the guilty," nor recognise or accept what has failed. But grace may find a way of escape and bring in salvation — praise His name!

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same principle carried forward

This refusal is not limited to Jeremiah's day. One writer links the verse to the New Testament.

Prayer that halts God's governmental anger is not new; see 1 John 5:16. It is refused in Jeremiah 7:16 and chapter 15:1.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Another writer explains from that passage when prayer is out of place.

It is a most serious thing so to outrage the government of God that it must vindicate itself... Christian feeling rests on what is due to the glory of God. In such a case it would sense that pleading for any easing of the penalty is fighting the rights of divine government. So the apostle says, "I do not say that he shall pray for it."

Modernised from C CrainOriginal wording

Summary

- Trust misplaced. They leaned on the temple building for safety, while their worship stayed outward only. The same false confidence appears wherever people treat religious observance as protection.

- Hearing refused. God had invited Israel to cry to Him. Now He says He will not listen, because they kept offerings in His house while whole households served idols.

- Obedience wanted. God asked for amended ways, not sacrifices — the same lesson He had already given King Saul.

- Intercession bounded. Intercession is the place for anyone with God's mind to make a way for His love. But that place can close, and faith must see when it has.

- Government real. God's government is as real as His grace. Grace can still open a way of escape, but the New Testament repeats the same limit on prayer.

Jeremiah 7:17 · Darby

Seest thou not what they do in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem?

God has just told Jeremiah to stop praying for Judah, and then asks him a question instead: does he see what is going on in the towns and the streets? The question is not for information — it is His own reason for not hearing the prophet's prayer.

The house they trusted

The people assumed God would stay in His house whatever they did. So He points them back to Shiloh. The tabernacle first stood there — the tent that housed God's presence before the temple was built.

He points to Shiloh, where first the tabernacle of the congregation had been set up. How empty and foolish the notion, that God would keep His seat where His people insulted Him to His face!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

A prayer God will not receive

The command in the previous verse is not unique in Scripture.

Prayer that stops the course of God's governmental anger is not new; see 1 John 5:16. It is refused in Jeremiah 7:16 and chapter 15:1. Here the question is only asked.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Kelly notes how far that refusal reached.

Suppose the best men who ever lived appeared in the land, the men best known for their prayers of intercession. Even they could not change His fixed determination to judge the land. "Though," He says, "Moses and Samuel stood before Me, yet My heart would not turn toward this people."

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What the streets showed

The next verse answers God's question. It shows one household at work.

Earlier in the chapter God had called on them to change their ways. He promised they would still live in the land if they obeyed His voice. But now He says, "Do not pray for this people, or lift up a cry or prayer for them, and do not intercede with Me, for I will not hear you." Children, fathers and women were all united in a common effort "to pour out drink offerings to the queen of heaven." They were busy with gross idolatry, though they still offered sacrifices in the temple. But God wanted obedience, not sacrifice, just as He had told king Saul long before.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The goddess behind the cakes

The "queen of heaven" was no local invention of Judah's.

They had fallen in with the worship of a female idol. That worship was common among the idolatrous nations around them: the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. The Babylonians called their Venus, Ishtar, the queen of heaven. The Assyrians called her Beltis, the female form of Baal. In the sculpture they placed a star over her head and called her "the mistress of the heavens." The Phoenicians worshipped this "queen of heaven" under the name of Ashtoreth or Astarte. The Jews had adopted this wicked worship, with all kinds of immoral ceremonies attached to it. The women made cakes to present to this goddess. Jewish tradition tells us that they stamped the image of the idol on each cake.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Worship robbed of its object

Alongside the cakes went drink offerings — wine poured out. Both the incense and the wine stood for something else.

Incense spoke of the merits of Christ. Drink offerings spoke of the joy found in the life and death of the Lord Jesus. Yet by the incense they burned to idols, and the wine they poured out, the people claimed by their action to have found merit in false gods. And they claimed joy in a rite which was in fact the worship of demons, little as they knew it.

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Seen. God's question is not asking for news. He is showing His prophet what He Himself already sees in every town and street of Judah.

- Refused. What God sees is why He stops the prayer. Once He has settled the judgment, He turns intercession back — even Moses and Samuel would not have moved Him.

- Shared. The sight is a family at work together: children, fathers and women, each with a job, in one idolatry.

- Stolen. The incense and poured-out wine belonged to God and pointed to Christ. Handed to an idol, they became the worship of demons.

- Shell. All this went on while the sacrifices continued in the temple. People can go this far and still keep the outward form of religion.

Jeremiah 7:18 · Darby

The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink-offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.

Jeremiah 7:18 shows a whole family at work on one task: baking cakes for a foreign goddess. God says they do it "to provoke me to anger" — and these same people still went to the temple and called it their safety.

Every Hand in the House

Three groups, three jobs. This was not one person's secret sin.

Children, fathers and women were all united in one common effort to pour out drink offerings to the queen of heaven. They were deep in idolatry, and yet they still offered sacrifices in the temple. But God wanted obedience, not sacrifice, just as He had told king Saul long before.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Who the "Queen of Heaven" Was

Judah did not invent this goddess. She came from the nations around them.

They had joined in the worship of a female idol. This worship was very common among the idol-worshipping nations around them: the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. The Babylonians called their goddess Ishtar the queen of heaven. The Assyrians called her Beltis, the female form of Baal. In their carvings they put a star over her head and called her "the mistress of the heavens." The Phoenicians worshipped this "queen of heaven" under the name of Ashtoreth or Astarte. The Jews took up this wicked worship, and all kinds of immoral ceremonies went with it. The women made cakes to present to this goddess. Jewish tradition tells us that they stamped the image of the idol on each cake.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Not every writer names her the same way.

Jeremiah also says that in Judah and Jerusalem the people made cakes to the QUEEN OF HEAVEN. Most take this to mean the moon, worshipped as Astarte.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Sacred Actions Given to a False God

The verse also names poured-out drink offerings. God Himself had given that act its meaning.

Incense spoke of the merits of Christ. Drink offerings spoke of the joy found in the life and death of the Lord Jesus. Yet the people burned that incense to idols and poured out that wine to them. By this act they claimed that the merits belonged to false gods. They claimed to have found joy in a rite that was in fact the worship of demons, little as they knew it. What an insult to God, and to Him whom the sacrifice pictured, when Israel gave drink offerings to idols!

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Two Religions at Once

All this went on while the same people filled the temple and called it God's house.

In chapter 7 the prophet exposes the double life of the people. On one side they spoke of "the temple of the LORD" as their own possession. They made sure to stand before the Lord in "this house, which is called by My name." They even thought God had rescued them so that they could carry on with their detestable practices (v.10). They had every appearance of godliness. They even gathered in the place God had chosen. But what about their actual behavior?

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Writers call that mixture worse than open idolatry.

What made this idolatry so offensive was that they joined the idols of the nations to the Lord. To be a plain, out-and-out idolater was not nearly as evil as to know the true God and still put false gods on the same level as Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Where This Habit Ended

This was no passing phase. In the end the people defended the habit instead of dropping it.

So they gloried in their shame. They took no notice of the works of the Lord or of the work of His hands, and it destroyed them. They read their troubles as the price of neglecting the queen of heaven. Their will was fully set on a so-called religion that treated plain depravity and passion as sacred.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Warning Carried Forward

Writers do not leave this sin in the past. They ask whether the same swap of mediators has come back.

And if we come closer to home, is there not as clear a setting up of false mediators in the Church of Rome as there ever was of false gods in Israel? Israel had their "queen of heaven." Does Rome not have hers? People give her even more passionate devotion, and they do it after turning from far clearer light.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Household — Children gathered, fathers kindled, women kneaded. Idolatry here was a shared family job.

- Temple — The same people kept every appearance of godliness in God's house, and still baked for the goddess at home.

- Substitute — The "queen of heaven" was a goddess borrowed from the nations around, served with stamped cakes and immoral rites. Some take the title to mean the moon.

- Insult — Drink offerings were God's own language of joy in Christ, handed over to false gods. That is worse than open idolatry, because these people knew the true God.

- Result — Their will hardened. They blamed their ruin on stopping the idol worship, and that same false trust in outward religion is the warning for today.

Jeremiah 7:19 · Darby

Is it I whom they provoke to anger? saith Jehovah; is it not themselves, to the shame of their own face?

God speaks through Jeremiah to people who crowded His temple while their homes served other gods. Here He turns their own logic back on them with a question: if they set out to provoke Him, who ends up harmed?

Reasoning before judgment

Even at this depth of corruption, the Lord does not strike at once. He argues His case. He points to Shiloh, where the tent of worship first stood in the land.

But God stoops to reason with His people, despite how coarse they had become. He points to Shiloh, where the tent of meeting was first set up. What an empty and foolish idea, that God would keep His seat where His people insulted Him to His face!

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The question in this verse belongs to that reasoning. A holy place gives no cover to people who insult God inside it. So the Judge shows the accused what they have done to themselves.

Where the harm lands

The verse answers itself: the provocation boomerangs. One writer draws the same principle out of the very first sin, when Adam hid himself.

Adam hides himself from God. Is there no harm in having broken with God so badly that you want to get out of His presence? And it is not God you have harmed so much as yourselves. The God of love brings home to a person's conscience the knowledge of the harm he has done to his own soul. One weighty reason why God has given His blessed word is to show a person what he has done to himself before God. He has given it in love; for if He were dealing with people in judgment He would have left them under it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Telling people what their sin has cost them is an act of love, not cruelty.

Sin as an outrage against God

People can push that truth too far, as if sin never touched God at all. Commentators hold both sides: the ruin falls on us, and the offence is against Him.

First, let us recall that all sin is against God. It affects Him and not only us who are sinners. True, it ruins us and brings us under the power of death and judgment. But it is also an outrage against His holy nature. It defies His authority and tries to dishonour Him in front of His creatures.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

So the Lord is not denying that they provoke Him. He is asking who ends up wrecked by it.

The shame idols pay out

The verse ends with their own shame. That shame comes from the idols, which prove worthless to the very people who made them.

If Israel witnesses to God, the idolaters become their own witness to the emptiness of their idols. Those who make the idols are "nothing," and their images "do not profit." They "neither see nor know," and their helplessness brings shame to their makers.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

A god that cannot see, know, or act leaves its worshipper exposed. The shame is not an extra punishment added on. It is what the idol was always going to pay out.

When people boast in their shame

Later, in Egypt, these same people told Jeremiah that their troubles began when they stopped burning incense to the queen of heaven, an idol they had long served. They read their ruin backwards.

So they gloried in their shame, paying no attention to the works of the Lord or the working of His hands, to their own destruction. They blamed their disasters on neglecting the queen of heaven. That is because their will was fully set on a so-called religion, one that made corruption and lust sacred.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

This is the last stage of what this verse describes. People first ignore the shame, then defend it, then call it blessing.

Summary

- Aim. They aimed their worship at other gods. God's question strips away the illusion that He is the one damaged.

- Recoil. The blow comes back on the one who threw it. As one writer puts it, "it is not God you have harmed so much as yourselves." God gave His word in love, to show people the harm they have done to themselves.

- Reality. Sin is not harmless to God either. It ruins us, and at the same time it outrages His holy nature and defies His authority.

- Shame. Their own shame is the idol's payout: helpless images make their makers look foolish.

- Warning. Unchecked, that shame gets renamed blessing. In Egypt the survivors credited the queen of heaven with their good years, and that boast ran straight to their own destruction.

Jeremiah 7:20 · Darby

Therefore thus saith the Lord Jehovah Behold, mine anger and my fury shall be poured out upon this place; upon man, and upon beast, and upon the trees of the field, and upon the fruit of the ground; and it shall burn, and shall not be quenched.

God's temple sermon in Jeremiah 7 ends here. The sentence falls on the people, and on the place, the animals, the trees and the crops. One question presses hard: why does a house that carries God's own name give its people no shelter?

Why the Verse Begins With "Therefore"

Everything in the verse hangs on the word "therefore." One commentator lists the charges that lead up to it:

Jeremiah warns them against deceptive words in verses 4 and 8: "Do not trust in these deceptive words: 'This is the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD.'" This might sound very pious and religious. But they themselves practised oppression and idolatry, and they carried on dishonest trading in His house. Therefore His anger and His fury should be poured out upon this place (v. 20).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The Place God Refuses to Defend

"This place" is the temple in Jerusalem. Earlier in the chapter God points them to Shiloh. That was the site where the tabernacle first stood in the land, and God later abandoned it. The lesson is blunt:

What was Shiloh now? God had profaned it. And God would do the very same thing to the place where the ark now stood — the sanctuary in Jerusalem. It is impossible that God should bind Himself to maintain an empty form. He would no longer sustain what was a beautiful picture of His truth. In His eyes the state of the people and of the priests was the most offensive evil under the sun.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Kindled the Fury

The verses just before name the offence. Whole families joined in idolatry while the temple services carried on. They had copied the worship of the nations around them:

They had provoked Him by making cakes to the queen of heaven. They had fallen in with the worship of a female idol. Such worship was common among the idolatrous nations around them — the Phoenicians, the Assyrians, the Egyptians and the Babylonians. They called the Babylonian Venus, Ishtar, the queen of heaven... The women made cakes to present to this goddess.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Past the Point of Prayer

God announces the fury only after He shuts the door of prayer. One writer sets the two halves of the chapter side by side — God's offer, and His sentence after they refused it:

God still waited in long-suffering. But the dreadful state of Israel made His sentence of judgment unchangeable. Earlier in the chapter God had called upon them to amend their ways. He promised that they would still dwell in the land if they obeyed His voice. But now He says, "Do not pray for this people, or lift up a cry or prayer for them, and do not intercede with me, for I will not hear you." Children, fathers and women all worked together to pour out drink offerings to the queen of heaven. They were engaged in gross idolatry, though they still offered sacrifices in the temple. But God desired obedience, not sacrifice, even as He had told king Saul so long before.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The Mirror Held Up to Us

Commentators apply the verse to today. It speaks first to anyone resting on religious routine:

Such a false trust in ordinances and outward worship is only too evident in Christendom also. Crowds of unsaved people keep up their religious observances. They think this protects them and secures the Lord's help and blessing.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

It speaks next to the whole professing church. God begins His judgment where people wear His name:

Judgment fell on the house at Shiloh, where the Lord first set His name. It came again on the house at Jerusalem... The apostle Peter tells us, "For it is time for judgment to begin at the household of God" (1 Peter 4:17)... Corrupt Christendom will be judged no less than corrupt Judaism was. When people falsify the truth and true piety is gone, what can come but judgment from God? That is all the more certain if this false thing bears His holy name.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause — The fury is a "therefore." Oppression, idolatry and dishonest trading inside God's own house brought it on.

- Slogan — They trusted deceptive words. The chant about the temple sounded pious while their lives said the opposite.

- Shiloh — God had already emptied one sanctuary of His presence. He will not bind Himself to maintain an empty form.

- Sentence — God offered mercy first: amend your ways and stay in the land. Only after refusal does He forbid prayer and call the judgment unchangeable.

- Mirror — Judgment begins at the household of God. Religious routine is no shelter. The warning lands hardest where people wear His name without the reality.

Jeremiah 7:21 · Darby

Thus saith Jehovah of hosts, the God of Israel Add your burnt-offerings to your sacrifices, and eat the flesh.

Jeremiah stands at the temple gate, and God tells the worshippers to eat the meat of their own burnt offerings. The burnt offering belonged wholly to God, so why does He hand it back as if it were ordinary food?

How the people used their offerings

The people were not neglecting worship. They were using it as cover:

The rest of Jeremiah 7 (verse 21 onward) reminds the people that Jehovah's claim was obedience. It was not burnt offerings to hide their transgressions and stubborn wickedness. That wickedness grew worse and worse as the prophets followed the law.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The delusion behind the ritual

Earlier in the chapter Jeremiah exposed what the crowd believed about the building they stood in:

Their worship was only external. They trusted in the temple of the Lord. They acted as if a blessing belonged to the house itself, and as if the house would shield them from disaster... Such false trust in outward worship and religious rules is only too obvious in Christendom also. Crowds of unsaved people keep up their religious routine and think it protects them and secures the Lord's help and blessing. They trusted in lying words. They were thieves, murderers, adulterers, perjurers and idolaters. Yet they thought that going to the house of the Lord would rescue them from these abominations.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the meat was worthless to God

The burnt offering was the one sacrifice given wholly to God. Cut worship loose from that, and what is left is not neutral:

True worship stays tied to the offering of Christ to God — to its power, and to the awareness of how infinitely acceptable that offering is. The point here is not the putting away of sins, though without that we could not approach at all. The point is its own excellence as a burnt offering, all burnt to God as a sweet savour. The moment our worship separates itself from this, it becomes fleshly: either a form, or the delight of the flesh. If the peace offering was eaten apart from this offering of the fat, it was a mere fleshly feast. It was a form of worship with no real communion with the delight and good pleasure of God. It was worse than unacceptable — it was really iniquity.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What God asked for first

At the exodus, God's first demand of Israel was obedience:

He brands their sacrifices as worthless. He gave no command concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices in the day He brought them out of Egypt. Destructive critics have built a childish argument on this verse. They claim that Moses did not give the law of sacrifices, and that it was introduced many centuries later. When the Lord first led them out of Egypt, He gave them no laws about sacrifices, but asked obedience. They did not listen; nor did they in Jeremiah's day.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

God will not prop up an empty form

So the temple became the target of judgment, not a shelter from it. There was already a precedent:

Shiloh was the place where the tabernacle first stood in the land (verse 12). What was Shiloh now? God had profaned it. And God would do the very same thing where the ark now stood, in the sanctuary at Jerusalem. It is impossible that God should bind Himself to maintain an empty form. The temple was a beautiful picture of His truth. But He would no longer keep it standing while the state of the people and the priests was the most offensive evil under the sun in His eye.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The One who came to obey

This verdict on sacrifice is not new with Jeremiah. It runs through the Old Testament and points to Someone else:

The Old Testament itself bore the clearest witness that animal sacrifices had no real value in the eyes of God. This Psalm is like light breaking through the mist. It declares that at least Someone would take the place of all such offerings. The Psalm says, "ears You have dug for Me." The Spirit of God interprets His own words this way: "A body You have prepared Me." Does this not imply that He would take the lowly place of the Servant, fully obedient to the Father's will, ears opened to hear His Word?

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Obedience claimed. God's first demand of Israel was obedience, not offerings. Sacrifice was never a way to cover ongoing wickedness.

- Obedience replaced. They swapped the building and the ritual for the obedience God asked. They trusted the temple to shield them while they lived as thieves, adulterers and idolaters.

- Obedience missing. Worship cut off from the offering given wholly to God is not just empty. It becomes fleshly, a form, and in God's sight iniquity. So He tells them to eat the meat themselves.

- Obedience judged. Shiloh proved God will not keep a hollow form alive for the sake of its history. The same warning stands over religion today.

- Obedience supplied. What no burnt offering could give, Christ brought — ears opened, a body prepared, coming to do God's will.

Jeremiah 7:22 · Darby

For I spoke not unto your fathers, nor commanded them concerning burnt-offerings and sacrifices, in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt;

Jeremiah's message strikes at the temple itself: the building the people trusted would not save them. Then comes a line that has puzzled readers ever since — at the exodus, burnt offerings were not what God spoke about, so what does this verse deny?

A message against the temple

One writer traces the argument of the whole chapter. Watch what the temple has turned into.

Jeremiah 7 begins a new prophecy, focused especially on the temple. The people had no conscience about it, and wanted the temple to be their protection. Instead, it had become a further demonstration of their sin. They were to remember Shiloh, because the house of God would likewise be overthrown... He required obedience and not sacrifice, and if the people came into His house while they were practising idolatry, they only defiled it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

What God asked first

The point turns on timing. At the exodus itself, God asked for something other than offerings — and one writer answers a claim critics build on this verse.

He brands their sacrifices as worthless. He gave no command concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices in the day He brought them out of Egypt. Destructive critics have built a childish argument on this verse. They use it to prove that Moses did not give the law of sacrifices, and that it came in many centuries later. When the Lord first led them out of Egypt, He gave them no laws about sacrifices, but asked obedience. They did not listen; nor did they in Jeremiah's day.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What God said at the exodus

One writer sets down the words God did speak at that moment, and what they asked for.

In Exodus the word of the Lord to Moses is, "This is what you shall say: You have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles' wings and brought you to Myself." Then: "Now therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice," and so on. And all the people answered together, "All that the Lord has spoken we will do." I am not speaking here of their ability to keep their promise. I am speaking of the principle of obedience — the only principle on which God could deal with man, or man walk with God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Why God gave the offerings

The verse does not cancel Leviticus. One commentator explains what the offerings were for, and what they were never for.

God did command such sacrifices in Exodus and Leviticus. But He did not command them because He desired such things. He commanded them simply to illustrate that these were all symbols of the one future sacrifice of Christ. Israel should at least have realised that they were only symbols. What they were symbols of, Israel no doubt did not know.

Modernised from L M GrantOriginal wording

The wilderness record

There is a historical side too. What did Israel actually bring to God in the wilderness?

As to history, we have no proof that anyone brought a single offering during the whole time they were in the wilderness. Burnt offerings were always voluntary. Given the state of Israel, it is just as likely they never gave it a thought. They sinned without any regret, and they certainly had never circumcised their children, so they really had no right to offer any sacrifice... Indeed Amos 5:25 complains that they did not offer sacrifice to Jehovah, but took Moloch and Chiun for their gods.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same trap today

These worshippers kept the outward forms. One writer asks what that means for us now.

The Lord had said that He hated their appointed feasts. Why was this? Was it not because of the formal, empty way the people kept the feasts, while they themselves were defiled with sin and going on with evil? Do you not think you and I can learn a very valuable lesson from this for ourselves today? Suppose the heart is away from God, the hands are defiled with sin, and the feet are not walking in the truth. Do you think the Lord likes a correct form and fine outward worship any better?

Modernised from G C WillisOriginal wording

Summary

- Temple — the building was no shelter. Like Shiloh, it would be overthrown, and worship there alongside idolatry only defiled it.

- First — at the exodus God asked for obedience, not offerings. The verse denies that sacrifices came first, not that God ever gave them.

- Symbol — God never wanted the offerings for their own sake. They pictured the one sacrifice of Christ still to come.

- Unused — Israel's wilderness years bear this out. There is no proof of offerings then, and they carried other gods instead.

- Now — the same swap is alive wherever a correct outward form covers a heart away from God and feet not walking in the truth.

Jeremiah 7:23 · Darby

but I commanded them this thing, saying, Hearken unto my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people; and walk in all the way that I command you, that it may be well with you.

Jeremiah preached these words at the temple gate, to people who thought the building itself would save them. God points them back to what He asked for when He first brought Israel out of Egypt: not offerings, but a listening ear.

The Claim God Made at the Exodus

The verse looks back to the day Israel left Egypt and states what God commanded then. One writer points out what God asked for first, and answers a wrong conclusion critics have drawn from it:

He brands their sacrifices as worthless. He gave no command concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices in the day He brought them out of Egypt. Destructive critics have built a shallow argument on this verse. They use it to prove that Moses did not give the law of sacrifices, and that it came in many centuries later. When the Lord first led them out of Egypt, He gave them no laws about sacrifices, but asked obedience. They did not listen; nor did they in Jeremiah's day.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Offerings Used as Cover

The people in Jeremiah's day were still bringing sacrifices. The problem was what they were bringing them for:

The rest of Jeremiah 7 reminds the people that obedience was what the Lord claimed, not burnt offerings to hide their sins and stubborn wickedness.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same misplaced confidence, one writer observes, did not die with Judah:

Their worship was only external. They trusted in the temple of the Lord, as if the house itself carried some blessing and would shield them from disaster… The same false trust in outward forms and ceremonies is only too clear in the Christian world as well. Crowds of unsaved people go through their religious routines and think this protects them and guarantees the Lord's help and blessing.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

"Obey My Voice" — the Only Ground

One writer goes back to what God said to Moses after the Exodus, and to how the people answered:

In Exodus the word of the Lord to Moses is: "Thus you shall say, You have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles' wings and brought you to myself. Now therefore, if you will indeed obey my voice," and so on. And all the people answered together, "All that the Lord has spoken we will do." I am not speaking here of their ability to keep what they promised. I am speaking of the principle of obedience — the only principle on which God could deal with man, or man walk with God.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The same principle reappears in judgment on a king, in the life of Christ, and in the calling of the believer:

When Saul turned away from God in 1 Samuel 15, judgment rested on the same ground — "Why then did you not obey the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice." We see the same principle, in perfection, in our Lord's constant walk. It is also the character of the believer's sanctification — sanctified to obedience and the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ (1 Peter 1:2). This is the purpose, the object, of his sanctification.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Relationship Promised

"I will be your God, and you shall be my people" is the heart of the offer. One writer weighs what this promise means for Israel and what it means for Christians now:

Next, "I will be their God, and they shall be my people." As this will be Israel's portion in that day, so it is ours now. More than this is ours, because we can say by the Spirit "Abba, Father," Christ's Father and our Father, Christ's God and our God. As before, it will no longer be an imposed ordinance or a possibly empty title of relationship. All is now made real, intrinsic and lasting by His grace.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

"That It May Be Well With You"

The closing clause ties wellbeing to walking in the whole way God commands. One writer separates how a person is saved from how much blessing that person enjoys:

If the people honoured the Lord by submitting to His word, He would bless them in the way described — in the land, and with earthly blessings that matched the covenant they lived under. It is different with Christians. Pure unconditional grace saves them. But once saved, their blessing and their enjoyment of spiritual blessing depend on their walk, on obedience to the Word. We must always insist on this. They do not obey to be saved… but God has brought them to Himself through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, and their blessing during their stay in this world depends on their subjection to the mind and will of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Summary

- Voice first. At the Exodus God asked for a listening ear, not for offerings. Sacrifices were never meant to cover disobedience.

- Voice as the only ground. Obedience is the one principle on which God could deal with man, or man walk with God — broken in Saul, perfect in Christ, and the aim of the believer's sanctification.

- Voice refused, form kept. Judah's worship was external; they treated the temple as a shield. Writers apply the same warning to religious observance today.

- Voice answered by relationship. The promise attached is God Himself: not an imposed ordinance or an empty title, but a bond made real and lasting by grace.

- Voice obeyed, wellbeing enjoyed. Christians are not saved by obeying. But their subjection to God's word decides how much of their blessing they enjoy.

Jeremiah 7:24 · Darby

But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in the counsels, in the stubbornness of their evil heart, and went backward and not forward.

Jeremiah 7 speaks to people who kept up worship at the Lord's house while ignoring His voice. Verse 24 is God's own account of the result: they would not listen, they followed their own hearts, and the whole nation moved backward.

What God Actually Asked For

The chapter has been dismantling the people's confidence in sacrifice and ceremony. Verses 22-24 push that further: what God required at the very start was a listening ear, and that is exactly what was refused.

He brands their sacrifices as worthless. He gave no command concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices in the day He brought them out of Egypt. Critics who attack the Bible have built a childish argument on verse 22, to prove that the law of sacrifices did not come from Moses but was brought in many centuries later. When the Lord first led them out of Egypt, He gave them no laws about sacrifices, but asked obedience. They did not listen; nor did they in Jeremiah's day. It is a nation that does not obey the voice of the Lord, and does not receive correction.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Offerings were being used as a cover rather than an answer, and the problem hardened as time went on.

The rest of Jeremiah 7 reminds the people that obedience was the Lord's claim, not burnt offerings to hide their transgressions and stubborn wickedness, which grew worse and worse as the prophets followed the law.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Backward, Not Forward

The verse describes movement, and the movement is in reverse. One writer shows what that cost them, starting with the "lying words" Jeremiah warned about.

Jeremiah warns them against "lying words" in verses 4 and 8... This might sound very pious and religious. But they themselves gave in to oppression and idolatry, and they carried on wicked trade in His house. So He would pour out His anger and His fury on this place. They went backward and not forward. Truth had perished from their mouth. They had become the generation of His wrath. Their evil practices silenced the voice of gladness. Judgment from the Lord, who had called to them so often, must fall on them.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

A Will That Will Not Be Tamed

Why does a people that hears God's word still walk by its own plans? Later in Jeremiah, another group asks the prophet for guidance while having already made up their minds — and the same mechanism is at work.

Self-will had decided on its own course, and it deceived them. Nothing will so warp the understanding, and hinder the grasp of the truth, as self-will. It will not see what it does not want to see.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Scripture has an animal picture for this untamed condition, and this verse is one of the places it is drawn from.

The wild donkey is very wild and very swift. It is seldom tamed. It is a fitting emblem of man's natural birth.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The Patience Behind the Complaint

The verse is not a sudden verdict. It sits inside a long record of God speaking first, and speaking again — a patience that runs from the prophets to His Son.

God, in His goodness, has kept renewing His testimony. In His patience He has sent His prophets, rising up early, as it is said, to send them until there was no remedy (see Jer. 7). Last of all He sent His own Son.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The Phrase Reversed

Jeremiah also looks ahead to a day when this ends. The change does not come from the people. God Himself gathers the nations to Jerusalem.

At that time they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the Lord. All the nations shall be gathered to it, to the name of the Lord, to Jerusalem. They shall no longer walk after the imagination of their evil heart. In those days the house of Judah shall walk with the house of Israel. They shall come together out of the land of the north to the land that I have given for an inheritance to your fathers.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The ESV puts that line of Jeremiah 3:17 as "stubbornly follow their own evil heart." Verse 24 says that is just what they did.

Summary

- Asked — God asked for obedience from the start, not offerings. Sacrifices used to cover stubborn wickedness were worthless.

- Refused — Self-will picks its course first, then bends the understanding to fit. It will not see what it does not want to see.

- Backward — Refusing God's voice never holds ground. The wickedness grew worse and worse, truth perished from their mouth, and gladness fell silent.

- Pursued — Against that backward drift, God kept renewing His testimony. He rose early to send prophets until there was no remedy, and last of all He sent His own Son.

- Reversed — The hope is not a stronger will. God promises a day when they no longer walk after their own evil heart, and Jerusalem becomes the Lord's throne.

Jeremiah 7:25 · Darby

Since the day that your fathers came forth out of the land of Egypt, unto this day, have I sent unto you all my servants the prophets, daily rising up early and sending them;

Jeremiah 7 is a message about worship God would not accept. The people kept up their sacrifices, but they would not obey His voice. Verse 25 looks back over centuries of that. God kept sending messengers, one after another. So what does such persistence say about God — and about the people who ignored it?

The Force of "Rising Up Early"

Where the ESV says God "persistently sent" the prophets, older translations read "rising up early and sending them." God does not use that picture once. One writer counted the repeats and heard in them the Lord's love:

The book repeats strong expressions over and over again. In His zeal for their good He speaks of "rising up early" to speak to them, time after time — eleven times at least! How this speaks of the Lord's intense love for them! No wonder He wept over Jerusalem! They have "forsaken Me!" they have "forgotten Me!" they have "turned their backs unto Me!" He says again and again. This shows how deeply He felt the way they treated Him. He felt too the bitter suffering they were bringing on themselves.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What the Messengers Were Sent to Ask

The verses just before this one set the terms. When God brought Israel out of Egypt, His first demand was not ceremony:

He brands their sacrifices as worthless. He gave no command concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices in the day He brought them out of Egypt... When the Lord first led them out of Egypt, He gave them no laws as to sacrifices, but asked obedience. They did not listen; nor did they in Jeremiah's day. It is a nation that does not obey the voice of the Lord, nor receive correction.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Patience That Ran Until There Was No Remedy

A book so full of rebuke can look grim. One writer praises God for that very record:

Inspired history is true history, and gives the evil as well as the good. A mere flattering history would prove itself not inspired... As to prophecy, it is, I may say, constant attack on evil. Unbelief throws God's patience back in His face — the patience that went on rising up early and sending prophets, till there was no remedy. I adore Him for it, as for all His goodness.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

That patience was never a promise of safety. One writer shows both sides of it:

How untiring too is the patience of the Lord! He promises to turn back from the evil He had to threaten, if only they would listen and turn from their evil deeds. But if they kept on rejecting the prophets He had sent — He speaks of "rising up early and sending them" — let them prepare for the worst... It is an awful blindness when men presume on God's favour to His people, while staying indifferent to His will and glory.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

After the Servants, the Son

The line of messengers did not end with the prophets. One writer follows it to its last name:

God sent the prophets to deal with their consciences, "rising up early, and sending them." After all this, God says, "I have still one Son, they will respect Him." But they cast Him out.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Why Messengers Like These Get Refused

Why were these messengers refused? One writer points to something that has not changed:

Nothing is more striking than the way God's people, then and now, have persecuted the prophets again and again. We do not like to have our conscience disturbed by hearing of our failures. To admit that we are wrong, or have done wrong, is too humbling to religious flesh. We will only own it in vague, general terms. So the prophet who stirs the conscience — who reminds God's people of their sins — is never popular. People welcome the mere "teacher" with applause... but who wants a prophet to arouse the conscience by telling us of our failures and sins?

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent early. Jeremiah repeats "rising up early" again and again. It pictures God's eagerness for His people's good — and a heart that felt it when they forsook and forgot Him.

- Sent to ask obedience. At the exodus God asked for obedience, not sacrifices. They did not listen then, and they did not listen in Jeremiah's day.

- Sent on. A book full of rebuke is no stain on the record. It is proof of God's patience, and one writer adores Him for it.

- Sent last. After the line of servants came the Son — and they cast Him out too.

- Sent to consciences. Nobody welcomes a messenger who disturbs the conscience. Yet the real blindness is to count on God's favour while ignoring His will.

Jeremiah 7:26 · Darby

but they have not hearkened unto me, nor inclined their ear; and they have hardened their neck they have done worse than their fathers.

Jeremiah is speaking to people who kept bringing offerings while refusing to obey. Here God gives His verdict on the long line of prophets He sent: each generation grew worse, not better.

The patience behind the complaint

The charge lands hard because of what came before it. God did not speak once and give up. He kept rising up early, and one writer counts how often Jeremiah repeats that phrase.

We must mention a feature of this book. It conveys the intensity of feeling that filled the Lord's heart for His people and city. The same strong expressions come again and again. In His zeal for their good He speaks of "rising up early" to speak to them, time after time — eleven times at least! How this shows the Lord's intense love for them! No wonder He wept over Jerusalem! They have "forsaken Me!" they have "forgotten Me!" they have "turned their backs to Me!" He says again and again. This shows how He felt their treatment and the bitter suffering they were bringing upon themselves.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Not deafness but decision

"They did not listen" does not describe people who missed the message. A parallel passage in Zechariah shows what refusing looked like, right down to the stiffened neck of our verse.

Can anything be more solemn than the description of how they treated these divine messages? "They refused to listen, and pulled away the shoulder, and stopped their ears, so that they should not hear. Yes, they made their hearts as hard as flint, so that they should not hear the law and the words that the Lord of hosts had sent in His Spirit by the former prophets." There was therefore not only indifference, but real hostility to the word of God, even open rebellion against Him and His claims. Nehemiah confessed the sins of his people in almost the same words: "They dealt proudly, and did not listen to your commandments … and withdrew the shoulder, and hardened their necks, and would not hear." … So it was the will of Israel not to hear.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

What God had asked for

The rest of this chapter names what God wanted, and it was not a fuller altar.

The rest of Jeremiah 7 (verse 21 onwards) reminds the people that obedience was the Lord's claim, not burnt offerings to cover up their transgressions and stubborn wickedness. That wickedness grew worse and worse as the prophets followed the law.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why each generation got worse

The strangest part of the verse is that more warning produced more evil. One writer explains why: evil does not stay level, it builds up.

The very solemn point brought out here is that iniquity accumulates. The patience of God waits. More than that, it uses every means to call back to sincerity and to Himself those who have the truth and at least its outward form. The most touching appeals, the most forceful warnings, the condescension that reasons almost as between equals — stubborn men make all of it useless by despising grace and practising iniquity. At last God exhausts all His means of calling to repentance. Then comes the judgment that this divine patience had held back. Sin piled up from age to age brings it in, along with the hardness of heart that grew as men despised divine warnings and grace.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Doing worse than the fathers is also what makes the judgment fair. A son who has seen where his father's path led has no excuse for taking it.

Suppose a child has grown up knowing his father's dishonour, hearing of his disgrace and punishment. Would not that sin be hateful above all in his eyes, if he had any right feeling? … But suppose the son made light of it, and used it as encouragement to walk in the same path. Is it not just that a still more severe punishment should fall on that son?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The false safety that kept them deaf

So what let them ignore prophet after prophet? They assumed their standing with God could never be lost. One writer says that same false confidence lives on.

He shows them that their boast in an unbroken line of national privilege was an empty trust. The Jews held this false confidence as strongly as anyone else in Christendom ever has. The delusion was as destructive to them as it will be to Christendom. Nothing is more certain to bring destruction on Christendom than the idea of a security that cannot fail.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Early — God rose up early and sent prophet after prophet. The phrase He repeats measures His love.

- Refused — Not hearing was a choice. They pulled away the shoulder, stopped the ear, hardened the neck.

- Obedience — He asked for obedience, not offerings to cover stubborn wickedness.

- Accumulated — Despised grace leaves no one neutral. Sin piles up from age to age, so sons outdo their fathers.

- Exhausted — When God has used every means of calling to repentance, the judgment His patience held back falls.

Jeremiah 7:27 · Darby

And thou shalt speak all these words unto them, but they will not hearken unto thee; and thou shalt call unto them, but they will not answer thee.

God tells Jeremiah in advance how the people will treat his preaching. He must say every word, and no one will listen or answer. That raises a hard question. Why keep speaking to people who have already decided not to hear?

The audience the prophet was sent to

These words close a message Jeremiah gave at the temple gate. The chapter has already shown what kind of hearers stood there. One writer sums up the gap between what they said and what they did.

In chapter 7 the prophet exposes the double life of the people. On one hand they spoke of "The temple of the Lord" as their possession. They never missed standing before the Lord in "This house which is called by My name." They even thought God had rescued them so they could go on in their detestable practices (v.10). They had every appearance of godliness. They even met together in the place of God's choice. But what about their actual behavior? How much injustice, oppression and idolatry? Their actions contradicted what they claimed to be. So judgment would come upon them and upon their temple.

Modernised from Georges AndréOriginal wording

Why no answer would come back

The chapter itself shows why no reply would come. One writer gathers up what the people had become.

They went backward and not forward. Truth had vanished from their mouth. They had become the generation of His wrath. Their evil practices silenced the voice of gladness. Judgment must fall on them from the Lord, who had called to them so often.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Patience is what stands behind the warning

A message sent to deaf ears is not God losing patience. One writer places this chapter in a long line of renewed appeals that ended with the sending of the Son.

In His goodness, God has kept renewing His testimony. In His patience, He has sent His prophets. He rose up early, as it is said, to send them until there was no remedy (see Jer. 7). Last of all, He sent His own Son.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Judgment announced, yet repentance still urged

A message that will be refused is still not a death notice. The same writer shows Jeremiah doing two things at once, and states the principle about repentance and a sentence already announced.

And Jeremiah (chapters 7-14, and in other places) does exactly what Peter does. By his prophetical knowledge he says plainly that the people and the vessels of the temple would go into Babylon. At the same time he urges the people to repent, and says that by doing so they would be spared. And here is the principle. When Jehovah had pronounced the condemnation of a people or of a city, if that people or that city repented of its wickedness, He would turn away from the judgment He had pronounced (Jer. 18:7-11).

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The servant's measure is his Master's word

God warns Jeremiah in advance that no one will respond. That removes the one thing servants lean on. One writer, describing the same discouragement in a servant, separates judging work by its results from judging it by the Master's word.

This was a moment for that particular discipline in a servant's life. When it works, it lets him carry on his service whatever the results. Most people judge service by its results: good results mean it worked, poor results mean it did not. But the real servant must keep his eye only on his Master's word and leave the result to Him.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The same test outside Judah

Trusting a sacred building while ignoring the One named over it is not the fault of one nation only. One writer draws the same line to those who now bear God's name.

Corrupt Christendom will be judged no less than corrupt Judaism was. In God's own thought, His house is "the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth" (1 Tim. 3:15). It is marked by the mystery of godliness, seen perfectly expressed in our Lord Jesus Christ Himself — God manifested in the flesh. When the truth is falsified and true godliness is gone, what can come but judgment from God? And all the more so if this false thing bears His holy Name.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Patience first. God sent prophet after prophet until there was no remedy. This verse stands at the end of that long patience, not at the start of His anger.

- Profession exposed. The hearers claimed the temple as theirs while living in injustice and idolatry. That double life brought judgment on both the people and the building.

- Ears already closed. They went backward, not forward, and truth had vanished from their mouth. The silence shows what the hearers are, not what the message lacks.

- Speak anyway. The Master's word measures the servant, not the results. That is what keeps him going when no success is promised.

- Mercy still open. Even while announcing Babylon, Jeremiah calls for repentance. When God has pronounced a sentence, repentance turns it away.

Jeremiah 7:28 · Darby

And thou shalt say unto them, This is the nation which hath not hearkened unto the voice of Jehovah their God, nor received correction; fidelity is perished, and is cut off from their mouth.

God tells Jeremiah what to say once the preaching has run its course, and it is a verdict rather than an appeal. The hardest words come last: truth itself has died out, and the question is how a nation reaches the point where honesty has no home even in its speech.

Refusing correction

One writer finds the same spirit in Jerusalem just before it fell, and in a church that thinks it needs nothing.

A similar spirit prevailed among the people in Jerusalem just before its destruction by Nebuchadnezzar. Those who refuse "correction" are claiming by that refusal to be all they should be... The same thing meets us in Revelation 3, since Laodicea is so rich as to have need of nothing, and therefore no need of correction. So again we have to remind ourselves of our own danger here. It grows sharper as we draw near to the end of the church's history.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Obedience before sacrifice

The verse closes a passage about sacrifices. God's first claim on this people was never their offerings.

He brands their sacrifices as worthless. He gave no command concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices in the day He brought them out of Egypt... When the Lord first led them out of Egypt, He gave them no laws about sacrifices, but asked obedience. They did not listen; nor did they in Jeremiah's day. It is a nation that does not obey the voice of the Lord, and does not receive correction.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Truth perishing inside a working religion

Truth did not perish because the religion had stopped. It died while the temple still stood and the ceremonies still ran, and while every layer of society shared the guilt.

All this shows how far it is possible for men to go with an outward profession of piety. Every section of the community indulged in evil of almost every kind. Kings, princes, priests, prophets and people were all guilty before God, yet they trusted in "the temple of Jehovah." They imagined, with no ground for it, that nothing could harm them as long as the temple was in Jerusalem. Jehovah's word was nothing to them; they did not care for the honour of His Name, truth had perished, and only an empty form remained.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Another writer traces the same backward movement, and where it ends:

They went backward and not forward. Truth had perished from their mouth. They had become the generation of His wrath. Their evil practices silenced the voice of gladness. Judgment must fall on them from the Lord, who had called to them so often.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The same drift today

Keeping a form after the reality has gone is not only an ancient failure. One writer treats it as a standing human tendency, and a trap the devil is happy to use.

There has always been a strong tendency in the human mind to keep forms going when the power is gone. Power may clothe itself in a certain form, and as long as the form is the expression of the power, it is all right and good. But the danger lies in going on with the mere outward form without a single particle of inward power. So it was with Israel of old, and so it is with the professing Church now. We all have to watch against this trap of the devil. He will use a positive ordinance of God as a means of deceiving the soul and shutting out God altogether.

Modernised from C. H. MackintoshOriginal wording

The ones God noticed

A verdict on the nation was not a verdict on every person in it. In the same dark years, God kept His eye on the few who listened.

In the last days of the kings of Judah, when the nation had turned away from Jehovah, there were still those He took notice of... The divine record has kept the names of the princes. They were afraid when they heard the word of the Lord, and they pleaded with the king not to burn the scroll. The record also commends the sons of Jonadab, the son of Rechab, in that evil day, because they obeyed their father's commandment. It was a day marked by gross disobedience, and simple obedience has its reward from God.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Summary

- Refusal. To refuse correction is to claim you are already all you should be. That was the spirit of Jerusalem before it fell, and of Laodicea.

- Obedience. When God brought them out of Egypt, He asked for obedience, not sacrifices. Without it, their offerings were worthless.

- Decay. Kings, princes, priests, prophets and people were all guilty. They still trusted the temple, and they moved backward, not forward.

- Emptiness. Truth perished and only a form was left. Keeping the form after the power has gone traps the professing Church too, not just Israel.

- Exception. In that same evil day God recorded the names of those who trembled at His word. Simple obedience has its reward from Him.

Jeremiah 7:29 · Darby

Cut off thy hair, and cast it away, and take up a lamentation on the heights; for Jehovah hath rejected and forsaken the generation of his wrath.

Jeremiah 7 ends with a funeral order: shave the head, throw the hair away, and wail out on the bare hills. Three questions follow — why the hair, why those hills, and why has God turned away from this generation?

The chapter this lament closes

This order to mourn closes a message about the temple. The people were sheltering in a building instead of in God.

Jeremiah 7 begins a new prophecy, and it is aimed above all at the temple. The people had no conscience, and they wanted the temple to protect them. Instead it had become a further proof of their iniquity. They were to remember Shiloh, for God would overthrow His house in the same way. He would cast off Judah, as He had cast off Ephraim, and He would hear no intercession for His people. He required obedience, not sacrifice. If they came into His house while practising idolatry, they only defiled it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Hair cut off as public grief

Cutting off the hair was the normal sign of grief. The place chosen for the wailing is where the worst evil had happened.

The hair was cut off as a sign of mourning (Job 1:20). Jerusalem is to lament in the high places. They have defiled His house. On the heights of Tophet, in the valley of the son of Hinnom, they had burned their children as a sacrifice to Molech (2 Kings 23:10). The days were now to come when the same place should become the place of slaughter. The bodies of the people would then be food for the wild animals, and they would lie there unburied. Such was to be Jerusalem's rejection and judgment.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

A crown thrown away

The word for hair also carries the sense of a crown. What Jerusalem cuts away is a mark of dignity.

This wide range of meanings is surprising at first sight. Separation is, after all, something quite different from a crown. Yet it is very instructive. The high priest's diadem, the king's crown and the hair of the Nazirite all speak of a special form of consecration and the dignity that goes with it. Jeremiah's lament was that Israel had forfeited this adornment of long hair, the sign of consecration and separation for God.

Modernised from Michael HardtOriginal wording

What "generation" means here

"Generation" here is not limited to the people alive at the time. The same word is rendered "family" in the next chapter, and the Lord used it in a wide sense too.

"The LORD has rejected and forsaken the generation of his wrath. For the children of Judah have done evil in my sight, declares the LORD" (Jer. 7:29-30). "Death shall be chosen rather than life by all the remnant that remains of this evil family" (Jer. 8:3). Here the word is properly rendered "family," without any limit of time. In the discourse the Lord closed in Matthew 23, He uses the word "generation" in a wider sense. He speaks to them as a nation, and then adds that all these things will come upon this generation.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Another writer adds the moral side of the word.

"Generation" is also used for people of like quality and disposition, though not of one place or age. "God is in the generation of the righteous" (Psalm 14:5). We also have "the generation of the upright," "the generation of those who seek him," "the generation of his wrath," and so on.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

The condition that earned the title

Why did God call them the generation of His wrath? The chapter lists the reasons.

Their talk about the temple might sound very pious and religious, but they themselves practised oppression and idolatry (Jer. 7:6, 9, 18), and they carried on wicked trading in His house. So He would pour out His anger and His fury on this place (v. 20). They went backward and not forward. Truth had perished from their mouth. They had become the generation of His wrath. Their evil practices silenced the voice of gladness. The LORD had called to them so often, and now His judgment must fall on them.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

Long patience before rejection

God's turning away is the end of a long process, not a sudden mood.

God, in His goodness, has renewed His testimony again and again. In His patience He has sent His prophets, rising up early, as it is said, to send them until there was no remedy (see Jer. 7). And last of all, He sent His own Son.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Summary

- Shelter — Judah hid behind the temple while practising idolatry inside it. The house became evidence against them, not protection.

- Crown — the hair Jerusalem must cut off carries the sense of a diadem. She throws away the sign that she was consecrated and set apart for God.

- Mourning — cutting the hair was the ordinary sign of grief. Jerusalem must wail on the heights of Tophet, where she burned her children and where slaughter would come.

- Family — "generation" reaches past one age group to the whole nation. It reaches further still, to people of one moral character.

- Patience — God kept sending prophets, rising up early, until there was no remedy. Only then did the rejection come.

Jeremiah 7:30 · Darby

For the children of Judah have done evil in my sight, saith Jehovah; they have set their abominations in the house which is called by my name, to defile it.

Judah's sin was not only that they did evil, but where they did it: idols went into the one building that carried God's Name. Can a holy place protect the people who corrupt it?

The House That Bears His Name

The phrase "called by my name" is not decoration. It is what made the building the house of God at all.

The house of God is that which bears His holy Name, as He says, "which is called by My Name" (Jer. 7:10-11, 12, 14, 30). In Old Testament times this was true of the Tabernacle and of the Temple, but of no other structure then or since. This chapter mentions both (vv. 1-11, 12-14).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Evil Done in His Sight

God's charge here reaches back further than one generation.

God, in His goodness, has renewed His testimony again and again. In His patience He sent His prophets, rising up early, as it is said, to send them until there was no remedy (see Jer. 7). And last of all He sent His own Son… We see here sin inherited. Under the government of God, the people are held responsible for the sins of their fathers. Their sins were, in moral terms, the accumulation of all the sins that went before. God had borne with those sins in patience. The people despised that patience, and used it to plunge deeper into evil.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Privilege Turned Into Guilt

This was not the first house God had given up. Judah only had to look at Shiloh.

Shiloh was the place where the tabernacle first stood in the land (verse 12). What was Shiloh now? God had profaned it. And God would do the very same thing where the ark now stood, in the sanctuary at Jerusalem. God could not bind Himself to keep up an empty form… The Jewish people and their priests had received great truth and blessing, or at least great privileges. So their insults to His holiness in His own temple were all the more wicked.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

They felt safe, and that feeling was the danger.

He shows them that their boast was an empty trust. They claimed an unbroken line of national privilege… Nothing is more certain to bring destruction on Christendom than the idea of a security that cannot fail. I do not mean security for the soul, for the believer. That assurance is quite right. We cannot hold too strongly to the eternal life of the believer.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Defilement Inside the Walls

The "detestable things" were idols, and they came indoors. Meanwhile the temple service carried on, and Judah had a slogan to lean on.

Just before the captivity of Judah, the people kept up an outward pretence of worshipping Jehovah. But idolatry had come even into the place that bore Jehovah's Name. They were still saying, "This is the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD" (Jer. 7:4). It was an empty hope. They thought their formal, though corrupt, worship would save them from God's judgment, because the building called by God's Name still stood.

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Where Judgment Starts

The Name on the house did not shield it. It put the house first in line — and the same rule still holds.

And what a solemn fact it is. Judgment fell upon the house "which was in Shiloh", where the Lord set His "Name at the first" (Jer. 7:12). Then it came upon the house at Jerusalem… Peter tells us the same: "it is time for judgment to begin at the household of God" (1 Peter 4:17). We see it in the symbolic history of the churches in Revelation 2 and 3. God will judge corrupt Christendom no less than He judged corrupt Judaism… When people falsify the truth and true godliness is gone, what can come but judgment from God? And all the more so if this false thing bears His holy Name.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

What Carries the Name Today

So what carries God's Name today? Not a building.

The house of God today is a building not made with hands. God has no pleasure now in buildings made by hands, and He does not dwell in them, as He chose to do for a time in the two structures named (Acts 17:24; Heb. 9:1; 10:9). Believers on our rejected Lord are the "living" material of the present house of God, as 1 Peter 2:4-5 explains… It is wrong to claim any other structure as "The house of God". To give that name to a building of brick or stone denies the true nature and character of this house, which is the assembly of the living God.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- The Name makes it His. A place is God's house only because His Name is on it — that was true of the tabernacle and the temple, and of nothing else.

- The Name raises the guilt. The greater the privilege, the greater the insult when idols come into His own temple.

- The Name is not insurance. Boasting in an unbroken line of privilege was a false trust; God will not maintain an empty form.

- The Name draws judgment first. Shiloh fell, Jerusalem followed, and judgment begins at the house of God.

- The Name rests on people now. God's house today is living believers, not brick and stone. The warning now falls on any group that wears His Name but falsifies the truth.

Jeremiah 7:31 · Darby

And they have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; which I commanded not, neither did it come up into my mind.

Jeremiah's charge against Judah reaches its lowest point here. Just outside the city, in a valley, parents were burning their own children as worship. God's answer is the sharpest line in the verse: He never asked for it, and it never entered His mind.

No shelter in the temple

The people leaned on the temple for safety while this went on in the valley below.

Jeremiah 7 begins a new prophecy, focused above all on the temple. The people had no conscience about their sin, and they treated the temple as their protection. Instead it had become one more proof of their wickedness. They were to remember Shiloh, for God's house would be overthrown in the same way... He required obedience, not sacrifice. When the people came into His house while they were practising idolatry, they only defiled it.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Where Topheth was

The Valley of the Son of Hinnom was a real place. A later king acted against what Jeremiah describes.

The valley running from east to west, on the south of Jerusalem, is called 'the valley of the son of Hinnom.' In some part of this valley, thought to be the east end, parents passed their children through the fire to false gods. To prevent this, Josiah defiled Topheth in this valley.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Who really demanded their sons

Some have tried to soften what "passing through the fire" means. One writer rejects that, and says who was really receiving these children.

Some have argued about "passing through the fire," here and elsewhere, so as to deny that they burned their children. But this seems a kindly effort to soften the reality of the wickedness. It was the fullest, though not the only, profaning of the name of Israel's God. The Lord accepted a sheep or an ox, or even a much smaller sacrifice; Satan under these names demanded their sons.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The real motive

The word "sacrifice" sounds like self-giving. One writer looks behind the word at the parents' real motive.

People called this a sacrifice. But it did not come from unselfish love for Molech. It came from the selfish evil of wanting to get rid of a child. How evil it is today that many want to get rid of a child before it is born! Molech was an image with its arms stretched out. Parents placed their children in its arms while a fire burned beneath. Then drums and noisy music drowned out the child's cries as the fire burned it to death. So this religious wickedness treated the torture and murder of an unwanted child as holy.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

"Which I did not command"

God does not only condemn the cruelty. He condemns where it came from: people invented it. That test still cuts.

How many practices and customs in the Christian world come from what men have "devised" in their own hearts, with no foundation in Scripture! Many seem to think that in spiritual things everyone may do what is right in his own eyes, instead of "Thus says the Lord." God condemned Israel for doing what He never asked for. He says, "I commanded them not, neither came it into My heart" (Jer. 7:31; also 19:5; 32:35). It is the thoughts of God's heart, not mine, that I am to heed and put into practice. These He has revealed in His Word, and it is our happiness and wisdom to heed that.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

(The ESV reads "nor did it come into my mind.")

The valley of slaughter

The judgment falls on the very ground where the sin happened.

On the heights of Topheth, in the valley of the son of Hinnom, they had burned their children as a sacrifice to Molech. The days were now coming when that same place would become the place of slaughter. The dead bodies of the people would then be food for the beasts of the earth; they would lie there unburied. Such was to be Jerusalem's rejection and judgment.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

From Topheth to hell-fire

The valley's name outlived the valley. It became the word our Lord used for hell.

When our Lord speaks of Gehenna, or hell-fire, does He not point back to the valley of Hinnom? That is where the people burned their children alive. It is also called the valley of Topheth, from the fire-stove in which the children were burned... After Josiah's time, many believe the valley of Hinnom stayed a place of filth and pollution. People burned rubbish and dead animals there, and worms fed on the pieces the fire left. Does our Lord not draw a contrast here? Those fires went out and those worms died. But the eternal condition is one "where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched."

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

Summary

- Place. Topheth lay in the valley south of Jerusalem. There parents passed their children through the fire to false gods, until Josiah defiled the place to stop it.

- Power. God accepted a sheep or an ox; Satan, under these borrowed names, demanded their sons.

- Pretence. The word "sacrifice" dressed it up, but the drums that drowned the child's cries show what it really was.

- Principle. God's objection is not only the horror but the origin: it never came from Him. It is the thoughts of God's heart, not ours, that we are to act on.

- Payment. The valley where they burned their children became the valley of slaughter. Its name, Gehenna, became the Lord's own word for a fire that is not quenched.

Jeremiah 7:32 · Darby

Therefore, behold, days are coming, saith Jehovah, when it shall no more be said, Topheth, and Valley of the son of Hinnom, but the valley of slaughter; for they shall bury in Topheth, till there be no place.

Jeremiah has just described a people who burned their own children in a ravine outside Jerusalem. Now God renames that ravine, and the place of their sin becomes the place of their burial.

The Valley Gets a New Name

The new name is the judgment. What the people used as a shrine, God turns into a graveyard:

The Lord had rejected the generation of His wrath. So the valley of slaughter would take the place of the high places of Tophet in the valley of Hinnom's son. This would go on until Tophet had no more space for burial, and the bodies of Judah became food for birds and beasts. All joy would cease, and the land would be desolate.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What Had Been Done in That Valley

The old names in the verse carry a history. This was a real place on the south side of Jerusalem, and something specific had happened there:

This is often called "the valley of the son of Hinnom," but who Hinnom and his son were is unknown. The valley running from east to west, on the south of Jerusalem, now bears that name. In some part of this, thought to be the east end, children were passed through the fire to false gods. To prevent this, Josiah defiled Tophet in this valley.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Worship God Never Asked For

Verse 31 says God never commanded these burnings. They never even entered His mind:

God condemned Israel for doing something He never commanded. He says of it, "I did not command them, nor did it come into My mind." It is the thoughts of God's heart, not mine, that I am to heed and put into practice. These He has revealed in His Word, and it is our happiness and wisdom to heed that.

Modernised from C. KnappOriginal wording

The Ground Where the Children Died

The children had been burned there for a false god named Molech. Now God turns that same ground into a killing field:

On the heights of Tophet, in the valley of the son of Hinnom, they had burned their children as a sacrifice to Molech. The days were now to come when the same place should become the place of slaughter. Their bodies should lie there unburied. Such was to be Jerusalem's rejection and judgment.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

How Far the Judgment Reaches

Commentators differ on how far this threat reaches. Some read it as fulfilled when enemy armies besieged Jerusalem:

In Tophet, the valley of Hinnom, they had worked their abominations and burned their sons with fire. Now it should become the valley of slaughter, and the birds and wild beasts should eat their bodies. He would cause them to eat the flesh of their loved ones. It was fulfilled during the siege of Jerusalem (Lam. 4:10).

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

Others see the valley pointing past any human army to a judgment the Lord carries out Himself:

Now the valley of the son of Hinnom comes forward, and it always signifies judgment... Tophet points to the great judgment which the Lord will carry out when He Himself comes. It is not just the place where men carry out a sentence. Clearly, the judgment of Jerusalem is the topic.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Valley That Gave Hell Its Name

This ravine did not stay a piece of local geography. One dictionary traces the link back to the prophet Isaiah:

Isaiah gives the key to why this valley is linked in the New Testament, under the name Gehenna, with eternal punishment.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The same name was on the Lord's lips when He spoke of final judgment:

The Valley of Hinnom was the rubbish dump outside Jerusalem, where the fires always burned and the maggots never stopped their work. People knew it as Gehenna. On the Lord's lips this word became a terribly fitting picture of the home of the lost. Hell will indeed be the great rubbish heap of eternity. There God will separate all that is incurably evil from the good, and it will lie for ever under His judgment. This terrible fact reaches us from the lips of Him who loved sinful men and wept over them.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

Summary

- Renamed. God's judgment starts with a new name. The valley where Judah burned its children becomes the valley where Judah buries its dead.

- Unasked. The sin behind it was worship God never asked for. He looks for His own word, not our ideas.

- Overflowing. Judah buries its dead in Tophet until no space is left, and birds and beasts take the rest.

- Disputed. Some writers see this fulfilled in the siege of Jerusalem. Others read Tophet as a judgment the Lord carries out Himself.

- Remembered. That same valley gave its name to Gehenna. A ravine outside Jerusalem became the Bible's picture of hell, and the One who wept over sinners is the One who warned of it.

Jeremiah 7:33 · Darby

And the carcases of this people shall be food for the fowl of the heavens, and for the beasts of the earth; and none shall scare [them] away.

Jeremiah 7 ends a sermon preached at the temple gate, and it closes in horror: bodies in the open, with nobody left to drive the birds off. Why would God speak this way to His own people, and was the threat new?

The temple could not protect them

The people trusted the temple to keep them safe. One writer points to Jeremiah's answer — an older sanctuary God had already given up:

Shiloh was the place where the tabernacle was originally set up in the land. What was Shiloh now? God had profaned it, and God would do the very same thing where the ark was now placed, where the sanctuary was in Jerusalem. It is impossible that God should bind Himself to maintain an empty form. He would no longer keep up what was a beautiful picture of His truth while the state of the people and the priests was the most offensive evil under the sun in His eyes. The greater the truth and the privileges given to this people and their priests, the greater the wickedness of their insults to His holiness in His own temple.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The place of their sin becomes the place of their death

Tophet, in the valley of the son of Hinnom, stands just before this verse. Parents had burned their own children there, and the punishment lands on the same ground:

On the heights of Tophet, in the valley of the son of Hinnom, they had burned their children as a sacrifice to Molech. The days were now to come when the same place should become the place of slaughter. The carcasses of the people should then be food for the beasts of the earth; they should lie there unburied. Such was to be Jerusalem's rejection and judgment.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

An old warning, not a new one

The wording is not new. One writer lists this verse among Jeremiah's borrowings from an older book:

Jeremiah's quotations and citations from the Book of the Covenant are too many to mention. Notice a few from Deuteronomy to illustrate. Compare Jeremiah 2:6 and Deuteronomy 32:10; Jeremiah 5:15 and Deuteronomy 28:49; Jeremiah 7:33 and Deuteronomy 28:26; Jeremiah 11:3 and Deuteronomy 27:26.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

No room to bury, no joy left

The judgment does not stop with the bodies. It reaches the burial ground, and then every trace of gladness in the land:

The Lord had rejected the generation of His wrath. In the same way, the high places of Tophet in the valley of Hinnom's son should be replaced by the valley of slaughter, until Tophet had no more space for burial. The dead bodies of Judah should be food for birds and beasts. All joy should cease and the land be desolate.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the birds make the picture so terrible

The birds themselves carry a message. One writer reads their appetite as the opposite of God's character, and draws a lesson from it:

Many birds of the heaven are marked by qualities hateful to God for those He takes into relationship with Himself; others are unsuited to be the food of mankind. What can be more opposed to His character than fierce greed toward the living, and a hunger for the dead that is never satisfied? If the Israelite was forbidden to make such birds his food, the Christian is to have no fellowship with ways that are morally like them, but is to avoid them and speak against them. Christ is to be our food.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same summons sounds again at the end

Here nobody drives the birds away. In a scene still to come they are not merely left alone but summoned, and one writer sets that feast against another:

The birds seem summoned and ready to feed on the dead bodies as soon as the people are killed. An angel stands in the sun, the most central place for calling the guests of this great supper. It is very appalling… What a supper! How wide the contrast with the marriage supper of the Lamb!

Modernised from H. H. SnellOriginal wording

Summary

- Warned. Jeremiah did not invent this horror. He quoted an older warning: the same threat stands in Deuteronomy 28:26.

- Ignored. Judah trusted the temple building instead. But God had already given up Shiloh, and He could do the same in Jerusalem.

- Matched. They burned their children in the valley of Hinnom. Their own bodies would fall in that same valley.

- Stripped. When Tophet has no room left to bury the dead, the joy of the land is gone too.

- Repeated. The same birds are summoned again to a far greater battlefield still ahead. The contrast with the marriage supper of the Lamb could not be wider.

Jeremiah 7:34 · Darby

And I will cause to cease from the cities of Judah, and from the streets of Jerusalem, the voice of mirth and the voice of joy, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride; for the land shall become a waste.

Jeremiah's temple sermon ends with a threat of silence, not of armies or famine. The wedding songs in Judah's towns will stop. Commentators ask why God takes away the happiest sound of all, and where these same words turn up again.

The temple gave no cover

The sermon that ends here began by attacking the people's trust in the temple building. One writer points back to Shiloh, the first place the tabernacle stood in the land.

God had profaned it — He treated it as no longer holy. And He would do the very same thing where the ark now stood, in the sanctuary at Jerusalem. God could not tie Himself to keeping up an empty form. He would no longer keep up what was a beautiful picture of His truth. In His eyes, the state of the people and of the priests was the most offensive evil under the sun. The greater the truth and blessing, or at least the privileges, given to the people and their priests, the greater the wickedness of their insults to His holiness in His own temple.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Their own conduct silenced the singing

The joy does not fade on its own. God takes it, and the reason is the way the people lived behind their religious talk.

Their words might sound very pious and religious. But they themselves were given to oppression and idolatry, and wicked trading went on in His house. So He would pour out His anger and His fury upon this place. They went backward and not forward. Truth had perished from their mouth. They had become the generation of His wrath. Their evil practices caused the voice of gladness to cease.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

What "the voice of the bridegroom and the bride" stands for

Of all the sounds God could have named, He chooses a wedding. That choice is deliberate.

A marriage is an occasion for joyful celebration. The voice of the bridegroom and the bride speaks of the highest and purest human happiness. Those called to the marriage are invited to share the joy of that solemn yet happy event. When the judgment of the false church is given in Revelation 18, it is recorded, "and the voice of bridegroom and bride will be heard in you no more."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

Jeremiah made to live the sentence

Later God forbids the prophet to mourn with the grieving or to feast with the celebrating. One writer notes whose land is losing its joy.

Every sign of loving sympathy was now forbidden to the prophet, and so was every form of congratulation. "You shall not go into the house of feasting to sit with them, to eat and drink… Behold, I will silence in this place, before your eyes and in your days, the voice of mirth and the voice of gladness…" God would cause all festive occasions to vanish from the land of His delight, the land His eyes rest on continually.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same silence falls on the false church

The sentence is not reserved for Judah. One writer hears it again over Christendom — the world that carries Christ's name.

If there is any true and pure joy in this world, it is where the voice of the bridegroom and the bride is heard. But Christendom has found its joys without Christ, and because of this the voice of joy "will be heard in you no more." How great is the contrast between the false church and the true. Here, the false church loses forever all that it called joy. But in the next chapter we read, "Let us rejoice and exult and give Him the glory, for the marriage of the Lamb has come, and His Bride has made herself ready."

Modernised from An Outline of Sound WordsOriginal wording

The wedding songs come back

The verse ends with the land left a waste. Later in the same book, God speaks these words again — this time as a promise.

"Thus says the Lord: In this place of which you say, 'It is a waste without man or beast,' in the cities of Judah and the streets of Jerusalem that are desolate, there shall be heard again the voice of mirth and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride, the voices of those who sing… For I will restore the fortunes of the land as at first, says the Lord." He had threatened to take from them the voice of mirth and of gladness, of the bridegroom and of the bride, and He was now carrying that threat out. Just as surely, He assures them that the sounds of joy will be renewed in their land. He gives that promise against all appearances, and against the fears of desolation that their guilt made only too fitting. And not the sounds of nature only: there will be the voice of those who speak His praise and bring the right offering into His house.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Cause. Oppression and idolatry behind a religious front stopped the singing. The people's own practices made the gladness cease.

- Shelter. The temple gave no protection. God had already left Shiloh, and He will not keep up an empty form.

- Loss. He takes the purest human happiness there is, the sound of a wedding, from the land His eyes rest on.

- Reach. The same sentence falls on the false church. What sought its joy without Christ loses that joy forever.

- Return. God speaks the same words again, this time as a promise. The streets called a waste will carry the bridegroom's voice and the voice of praise.

Jeremiah 8:1 · Darby

At that time, saith Jehovah, they shall bring forth the bones of the kings of Judah, and the bones of his princes, and the bones of the priests, and the bones of the prophets, and the bones of the inhabitants of Jerusalem, out of their graves;

Jeremiah 8 opens at the graves of Judah, torn open long after the burials. Judah had worshipped the sun and moon, and now their bones would lie under those same lights — so why does God's judgment reach past death itself?

The chapter break hides the connection

These opening verses are not a new subject. They finish what God had begun to say in the chapter before.

These verses must not be detached from the preceding chapter. The division of chapters is often unfortunate in this book. The invaders from the north would even have dug out the bones of the dead. Kings, priests, prophets and people had worshipped the sun, the moon and the stars. Now they would lie exposed and spread out before the sun and moon. They would stay unburied and become dung. We have no doubt that all this really happened during the Chaldean invasion.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The chapter before had already spelled out the sentence.

The Lord had rejected the generation of His wrath. So the valley of slaughter would take the place of the high places of Tophet, in the valley of Hinnom's son. Tophet would have no more space for burial. The dead bodies of Judah would be food for birds and beasts, all joy would cease, and the land would be left desolate.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The sin behind the sentence

The bones are exposed to the sun, moon and stars because those were the objects Judah had served. Commentators point to what made that idolatry so serious.

What made this idolatry so offensive was the joining of the idols of the nations with Jehovah. Think of a plain, outright idolater. He was not nearly so evil as someone who shows that he knows the true God and still puts false gods on a level with Him.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Nobody's rank protected them

The list in the verse runs from the throne down to the street.

The worst part of the national evil was that not just some of the people were guilty. The prophet says: "An appalling and horrible thing has happened in the land: the prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction; my people love to have it so, but what will you do when the end comes?"

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

An ordinary word for an ordinary grave

The Hebrew word behind "their tombs" is qeber. It is the plain word for a burial plot — one a person owns and names.

Qeber appears as "grave of Abner" (2 Sam. 3:32); "his own grave" (1 Kings 13:30); "your grave" (2 Chron. 34:28); "their graves" (Jer. 8:1), and so on.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

That is why the threat cuts so deep. In Judah, losing your burial meant losing your honour, and even a king could be denied it.

The prophet Jeremiah spoke about Jehoiakim, King of Judah: "With the burial of a donkey he shall be buried, dragged and dumped beyond the gates of Jerusalem" (Jer. 22:19). Why was the king to be buried without any ceremony, just like a dead donkey? … No one thinks of mourning over a dead donkey. Why, then, was this king not to be mourned, and given a royal burial? Because he was so wicked.

Modernised from A. J. PollockOriginal wording

Idols and graves had met before

Judah had seen idols and graves brought together before, when Josiah moved against idol worship.

Josiah burned the image at the brook Kidron and threw the ashes on graves. This showed that the idolatry was worthy only of the corruption of death.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Summary

- Loved. The sun, moon and stars in this passage are not scenery. They are what Judah had served and worshipped alongside the true God.

- Mixed. Judah kept the true God's name and set false gods beside Him. Commentators call that worse than plain, open idolatry.

- Shared. The verse names kings, officials, priests, prophets and citizens. The guilt ran through every class, and the people liked it that way.

- Exposed. The judgment matches the sin. The bones of sun-worshippers lie exposed before the sun and moon, with no burial — and in Judah, burial marked an honoured person.

- Literal. Writers take this as real history, not a picture. The invaders from the north did it. Josiah had already shown what idolatry earns: only the corruption of death.

Jeremiah 8:2 · Darby

and they shall spread them out to the sun and to the moon and to all the host of the heavens, which they have loved, and which they have served, and after which they have walked, and which they have sought, and which they have worshipped they shall not be gathered, nor be buried; they shall be for dung upon the face of the ground.

Jeremiah 7 ends with judgment falling on a city full of idols, and chapter 8 follows that judgment into the graveyard. Enemies drag out the bones of kings, priests and prophets, and lay them under the sun, moon and stars these people had served.

One prophecy, not two

The chapter number in our Bibles marks a break the prophet never made. One writer reads these verses as the end of the sermon before them, and takes the scene as real history.

Verses 1–3. These verses must not be detached from the preceding chapter. The division of chapters in this book is often unfortunate. The invaders from the north would even have dug out the bones of the dead. Kings, priests, prophets and people had worshipped the sun, the moon and the stars. Now they would be exposed and spread out before the sun and moon, left unburied, and become dung. We have no doubt that all this was literally done during the Chaldean invasion.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

What "the host of heaven" was

Judah did not invent this. One writer traces the worship of sun and moon back to the earliest idolatry on record, and shows that Israel had already joined it to the idol Baal.

God's charge against the Northern Kingdom, when Assyria carried the people away captive, says that they "worshiped all the host of heaven and served Baal" (2 Kings 17:16). Note how "all the host of heaven" is here linked with Baal. In Jeremiah 7:18 Ashtoreth is called "the queen of heaven." From Job 31:26–27 we gather that homage to the sun and moon was the earliest form of idolatry.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Mixing the true God with idols

The verse piles up five verbs: loved, served, gone after, sought, worshipped. Writing on the same sin in Zephaniah, one commentator explains why God finds this kind of idolatry so offensive.

What made this idolatry so offensive was that they joined the idols of the nations to Jehovah. Being a plain, outright idolater was not nearly so evil. It is far worse to show that you know the true God and yet put false gods on a level with Him. This is the very outrage against God described here.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Bones, graves and the smell of death

King Josiah had already acted out this judgment on a smaller scale. One writer describes his clean-up of the same star worship, and where he put the ashes.

Josiah removed the idolatrous priests from the high places in the cities of Judah. He also removed all who burned incense to Baal, to the sun, to the moon and to the constellations of stars in the whole heaven (v. 5). Judah had multiplied her gods beyond measure. They had even put a wooden image in the house of the Lord, just as many churches bring in images that look nice but insult the Lord Jesus. Josiah burned the image at the brook Kidron and threw the ashes on graves (v. 6). This showed that the idolatry was worthy only of the corruption of death.

Modernised from Leslie M. GrantOriginal wording

Exposed, yet still unmoved

Judgment on this scale still left the people unmoved. One writer follows the scene to its end, where the prophet looks for a cure and finds none.

"This evil family" would spread out the bones of the departed before the host of heaven, and even desire death themselves. Yet they knew no shame, "neither could they blush"; and no one repented of his wickedness. The prophet, feeling all this, cries, "Astonishment has taken hold of me! Is there no balm in Gilead, is there no physician there?" (Jeremiah 8:21–22). None could be found. There was no man. The coming of Christ is the only hope.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

The same cult, a modern name

This cult did not stay in the ancient world. Another writer cites Jeremiah 8:2 and gives the practice its modern name.

They worshipped the hosts of the heavens from housetops. They worshipped the stars, and studied their movements as if they could give them help and a revelation. Astrology, so widely practised among civilised nations today, is an old cult (2 Kings 21:3, 5; Jeremiah 8:2; 19:13).

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Summary

- Continuity. Verse 2 belongs with chapter 7. The chapter break splits one sermon, and the invaders carried out this desecration literally.

- Creation. "The host of heaven" means the sun, moon and stars. Worshipping them is the oldest idolatry, and in Israel it arrived alongside Baal.

- Confusion. The offence was not plain paganism but mixture. People who knew the true God set false gods beside Him.

- Corruption. Josiah had already thrown idol ashes on graves. That marked star worship as fit only for death, and the same verdict now falls on these bones.

- Callous. The bones lay exposed, and still no one blushed or repented. Judah had no balm and no physician, so the only hope left was the coming of Christ.

Jeremiah 8:3 · Darby

And death shall be chosen rather than life by all the residue that remain of this evil family, in all the places whither I have driven those that remain, saith Jehovah of hosts.

Jeremiah 8 opens with the graves of Judah torn open, and verse 3 gives the verdict on the survivors: death will look better than life. Two questions follow — what judgment makes life unbearable, and who is "this evil family"?

Judgment that follows the dead into the grave

This verse ends a long sentence of judgment that began in the chapter before. Just before it come Tophet and the valley of slaughter, where the dead of Judah lay unburied.

Obedience was what the Lord claimed, not burnt offerings to cover up their wrongdoing and stubborn wickedness... The Lord had rejected the generation of His wrath, and so the high places of Tophet in the valley of Hinnom's son would be replaced by the valley of slaughter. Tophet would have no more room for burial. The bodies of Judah would be food for birds and beasts. All joy would cease, and the land would be left desolate.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The horror of verses 1–3 was not poetry. One writer takes it as history waiting to happen:

Do not separate these verses from the previous chapter. The division of chapters is often unfortunate in this book. The invaders from the north would even dig out the bones of the dead. Kings, priests, prophets and people had worshipped the sun, the moon and the stars. The invaders would expose their bones and spread them out before the sun and moon, left unburied and turned into dung. We have no doubt that all this really happened during the Babylonian invasion.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The gods they had loved

The bones would lie before the very objects Judah had served. One writer traces that worship, and the astrology that still lives on from it:

They worshipped the host of heaven from their rooftops. They worshipped the stars. They studied their movements as if the stars could give them help and a revelation. Astrology, so widely practised among civilised nations today, is an old cult (2 Kings 21:3, 5; Jer. 8:2; 19:13). Others used the holy name of the LORD, and at the same time they used the name of the idol Malcham. All of it was a turning back from the LORD and a dishonouring of His name.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the living envied the dead

The sentence falls on survivors, not on the fallen. Nothing in them has changed. The prophet, not the people, feels the horror of it:

"This evil family" would spread out the bones of the dead before the host of heaven. They would even long for death themselves. Yet they knew no shame, "nor did they know how to blush," and no one repented of his wickedness. Feeling all this, the prophet cries out. "Dismay has taken hold on me! Is there no balm in Gilead? Is there no physician there?" (Jer. 8:21-22). None could be found. There was no man. The coming of Christ is the only hope.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

"This evil family" — a race, not a date

The wording matters. One writer sets this verse beside the Lord's earlier words about "the generation of His wrath":

Again, "the LORD has rejected and forsaken the generation of His wrath. For the sons of Judah have done evil in my sight, declares the LORD" (Jer. 7:29-30). "Death shall be preferred to life by all the remnant that remains of this evil family" (Jer. 8:3). Here the word is properly translated "family," with no limit of time.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

That reading has a long reach. When Jesus said "this generation will not pass away," some take Him to mean the same thing Jeremiah meant:

So from all this it is clear that the term "this generation" was not meant to mean only the people alive in the Lord's day. It was meant, we believe, to refer to the Jewish race. That race shall not pass away till all is fulfilled. The word "generation" is used in that sense in the Septuagint, the old Greek translation of the Old Testament (Deut. 32:5, 20; Jer. 7:28; 8:3)... Israel remains still distinct, not counted among the nations, as Balaam predicted (Num. 23:9).

Modernised from C E StuartOriginal wording

Summary

- Sin. Judah worshipped the sun, moon and stars, studying them for help and revelation. They mixed the holy name of the Lord in with the name of an idol. All of it was a turning away from Him.

- Sentence. The judgment reached past death itself. Invaders would drag the bones from the tombs and spread them, unburied, before the very lights Judah had honoured. One writer holds that this really happened when Babylon came.

- Survivors. The worst portion falls on those left alive. They long for death, yet feel no shame. No one repents. Misery without repentance is the deepest part of the sentence.

- Scope. "This evil family" is not one span of years but a race, marked out by its character. The same word lies behind "this generation" in the Gospels.

- Hope. Jeremiah looked for a balm and a physician in Judah and found none. "There was no man." Only the coming of Christ answers a family like this.

Jeremiah 8:4 · Darby

And thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith Jehovah Do [men] fall, and not rise up? Doth one turn away, and not return?

God argues here from ordinary life. Judah had fallen and stayed down, wandered off and stayed away, and these two questions expose how unnatural that is.

Where the questions belong

These questions open a complaint that runs on through the chapter, from the people's refusal to repent to the birds of verse 7.

The prophet was also to reason with the people of Jerusalem about their constant backsliding, which they refused to repent of (vv. 4-6). They paid less attention than the common birds, big or small, which keep to their proper seasons — and all the while the people claimed to be wise (vv. 7, 8). But what wisdom is in those who reject the word of the Lord?

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The answer God gives

The next verse gives God's own answer: they refuse to return. One writer takes it as a warning about where unjudged sin ends up.

Nor indeed is this all, for unjudged sin leads to graver evil. Turn to chapter 8, where the Lord asks, "Why then has this people turned away in perpetual backsliding? They hold fast to deceit; they refuse to return" (Jer. 8:5). If I do not heed His word and return, I shall get into this awful condition of perpetual backsliding. We do well to heed the word: "Take care, brothers, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God … that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin" (Heb. 3:12-13).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Less alert than migrating birds

A few verses later God compares His people to birds that keep the seasons. One writer sets what the birds notice beside what Judah missed.

So in Isaiah 1:3 God complains that man cannot feel His grace. In Jeremiah 8:7 He complains that man cannot feel His judgement. The stork, the swallow, and the rest know their times, "but my people know not the rules of the LORD." (Older translations read "the judgment of the LORD.") The birds named in this passage are all migratory. They take notice of the seasons. They sense when the sunny season is over and the storms of winter are coming. Instinct tells them when to move on. But sadly, not man! … Judgement was near, but the people did not understand. And so there was no repentance.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The missing question

Verse 4 asks the people two questions. Verse 6 records the question they never asked themselves. One commentator shows what that silence cost.

Isaiah says, "Why will you still be struck down? Why will you continue to rebel?" Jeremiah had to say of the generation in his day, "You have struck them down, but they felt no anguish." And again: "I have paid attention and listened, but they have not spoken rightly; no man relents of his evil, saying, 'What have I done?'" Are we then to wonder that the sword of the Chaldean entered the land?

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The door that stays open

God's second question assumes that a person who turns away comes back. One writer shows that God never lets His people go, however far they fall. His proof is Peter, the disciple who denied he ever knew Jesus.

Remember that the Lord never gives His people up, whatever their state or condition. … speaking through Hosea, the Lord says, "My people are bent on turning away from me… How can I give you up, O Ephraim? How can I hand you over, O Israel? … My heart recoils within me; my compassion grows warm and tender." No! The Lord never forgets His people, however badly they may have sinned. The story of Peter on the sad night he denied his Lord proclaims this truth like a trumpet.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Summary

- The question. God argues from daily life: people who fall get up, and people who take a wrong turn go back. Not returning is the strange thing, not returning to Him.

- The answer. Judah's backsliding had become perpetual because they held on to deceit. Sin left unjudged does not stay still; it deepens.

- The deafness. They were less alert than migrating birds. Judgement was already on its way, and they never felt it coming. So no one repented.

- The silence. No one asked, "What have I done?" That unasked question is why the sword of Babylon reached the land.

- The way back. God never gives His people up. He asks "does he not return?" because He is still ready to receive anyone who does.

Jeremiah 8:5 · Darby

Why hath this people of Jerusalem slidden back with a perpetual backsliding? They hold fast deceit, they refuse to return.

God's question here is a complaint, not a search for information. The road home stayed open, yet this people held on to what deceived them and would not walk it.

The setting of the appeal

One commentator walks through the chapter. He places these verses as God's argument with a people who will not turn.

The prophet was to argue with the people of Jerusalem about their perpetual and unrepentant backsliding (vv. 4-6). They paid less attention than the common birds, great or small, which keep to their proper seasons. And all this while they claimed to be wise (vv. 7, 8).

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

What "backsliding" means

The word behind "backsliding" is a strong one. It points to more than a stumble.

meshubah, "a turning away, apostasy." Jer. 2:19; Jer. 3:6-12, 22; Jer. 5:6; Jer. 8:5; Jer. 14:7; Hosea 11:7; Hosea 14:4.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

How it became perpetual

This condition did not arrive in a day. One writer follows Jeremiah's chapters in order. He shows unjudged sin hardening into a settled state, and he turns the warning on himself.

Nor is this all, for unjudged sin leads to worse evil. Move on to the eighth chapter. There the Lord asks, "Why then has this people turned away in perpetual backsliding? They hold fast to deceit; they refuse to return" (Jer. 8:5). If I do not pay attention to His word and return, I will get into this terrible condition of perpetual backsliding. We do well to listen to the word: "Take care, brothers, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God … that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin" (Heb. 3:12-13).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The grip of deceit

They hold fast to deceit, and deceit is what hardens them. The hardening starts with what looks small.

A little evil allowed is the beginning of very great evil. Our hearts harden when we look away from Jesus, and pleasing ourselves takes the place of doing God's will. Only the intervention of mercy stops the end from matching the road we are on. Sin really is deceitful.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Refusal, not a closed door

God had not barred the way home. He had laid down a rule about repentance.

God lays this down as a principle. When He had announced condemnation on a people or a city, and that people or city repented of its wickedness, He would turn away from the judgment He had announced (Jer. 18:7-11).

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

The refusal described here is still recognisable. One writer sorts backsliders into two kinds: those who want to be left alone, and those who grieve over their state yet stay in it.

Two kinds of backsliders can be told apart. First, there are those whose backs are turned on Christ; they face the world and want to be left alone. Then there are many who wake up to how miserable their condition is. They groan over it, and they turn back to the Lord and to His people. But here is the unhappy thing in their case. They openly own their failure and the dishonour they have brought on the name of their Lord. Yet they stay as they are year after year, and seem to make no progress on the path of restoration. The way is open for their return, and yet they do not take it.

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Blind to the season

Verse 7 sets these people beside migrating birds. They could not read the times they were living in.

The birds named in this passage all migrate. They take notice of the seasons. They see when the sunshine is over and the clouds and storms of winter are coming. They have the instinct to know when they should move off. But it is otherwise with man! What was the character of the times in which Jeremiah prophesied? It was the last days of the kingdom of Judah. The northern kingdom of the ten tribes had already been overthrown, and "the destroyer of the nations" (Nebuchadnezzar) was on his way to overthrow Judah as well. Judgment was close at hand, but the people did not understand it. And so there was no repentance.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The way back

Earlier in the same book God had already shown these people the way back, and He asked one thing of them.

Backslider! He called them then, and told them to come back. Now He calls you back. You might ask, How can I get back?… Listen. "Only acknowledge your guilt" (Jer. 3:13). There is only one way back. What is it? Confession. "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness" (1 John 1:9).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Turning away. "Backsliding" here means a turning away, an apostasy — a direction, not a slip.

- Turning deepens. Sin left unjudged does not stay still. Drifting hardens into a fixed, perpetual condition.

- Turning hardens. Deceit is what they hold, and holding it hardens them — a little evil allowed is the start of very great evil.

- Turning blinds. Judgment was near, and they could not read the season. Migrating birds knew their times; this people did not, so no repentance came.

- Turning back. The door was never shut. God's rule was that repentance turns away the judgment He announced, and the one road home is confession.

Jeremiah 8:6 · Darby

I hearkened and heard they speak not what is right; there is no man who repenteth him of his wickedness, saying, What have I done? Every one turneth to his course, like a horse rushing into the battle.

God listened over a whole nation for one honest sentence about its sin, and no one said it. Instead every person rushed on in his own way, like a war-horse charging into battle.

God listening for a word that never came

One writer sets Jeremiah's words beside Isaiah's and names what followed for the nation.

Isaiah says, "Why should you be struck down any more? You will revolt more and more." Jeremiah had to say of the generation in his day, "You have struck them, but they were not grieved." And again he said, "I listened and heard, but they did not speak rightly: no one repented of his wickedness, saying, What have I done?" Are we then to wonder that the sword of the Chaldean entered the land?

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

(This is an older translation. The ESV reads: "I have paid attention and listened, but they have not spoken rightly.")

The same writer draws out what this refusal means for God's judgment.

Man cannot be corrected by any appeal. That is what makes God's judgment necessary, and that is what shows it to be righteous.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

The question no one asked

"What have I done?" is a small sentence, and God finds nobody willing to say it. One writer separates that question from the shock a person feels at his own failure.

Some sins are so shocking that a man who falls into them is appalled that he has fallen into such disgraceful sins. But that is not self-judgment about those sins themselves, either before God or man. It is disgust and surprise that they have overtaken him.

Modernised from G. V. WigramOriginal wording

Deceit held fast, return refused

The verse before this one had already named the condition: a people who cling to deceit and refuse to come back. One writer treats this as a warning about where unjudged sin ends up.

Nor indeed is this all, for unjudged sin leads to graver evil. Pass on to the eighth chapter, where the Lord asks, "Why then is this people of Jerusalem turned back by a perpetual backsliding? They hold fast deceit, they refuse to return" (Jer. 8:5). If I do not heed His word and return, I shall get into this awful condition of perpetual backsliding. We may well heed the word, "Take care, brothers, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God … lest any of you be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin" (Heb. 3:12-13).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

The horse and the heedless heart

The verse ends with a picture from the war-horse. Scripture uses that animal for several qualities, and it cites this verse for one of them.

They represent strength (Job 39:19; Ps. 147:10), swiftness (Jer. 4:13; Hab. 1:8), fearlessness (Job 39:18; Jer. 8:6), majesty (Esther 6:8), and strength in the battle.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The chapter goes on to compare the people with migrating birds. One writer explains what the people failed to read.

So in Isaiah 1:3 God complains that man is unmoved by grace. In Jeremiah 8:7 He complains that man is unmoved by judgement… The birds named in this passage are all migratory. They take notice of the seasons. They see when the sunny season is over and the clouds and storms of winter are coming. They have the instinct to know when they should move off. But alas, for man! What was the character of the times in which Jeremiah prophesied? It was the last days of the Kingdom of Judah. The northern ten-tribe kingdom had already been overthrown, and "the destroyer of the nations" (Nebuchadnezzar) was now on his way to overthrow Judah as well. So judgement was near, but the people did not understand it. And so there was no repentance.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The one way back

This verse names what was missing. Later in the same book, Jeremiah gives the words that would have filled the gap.

There is only one way of deliverance from this terrible downward path of the backslider. It is by honest acknowledgement of the state, and by simply looking to God for deliverance. It is put like this: "O Lord, though our iniquities testify against us, act for your name's sake; for our backslidings are many; we have sinned against you" (Jer. 14:7).

Modernised from W. T. P. WolstonOriginal wording

Summary

- Listening — God pays attention over a whole nation and hears no one speak rightly. Man refuses correction, and that shows His judgment to be right.

- Question — "What have I done?" is self-judgment. Feeling shock that a sin overtook you is not the same thing.

- Deceit — Sin left unjudged hardens into perpetual backsliding. There people hold fast to deceit and refuse to return.

- Speed — The horse pictures fearlessness. The people charged ahead while judgement was near, and so there was no repentance.

- Return — The missing sentence is still open to anyone: honest acknowledgement of the state, and looking to God to act for His own name's sake.

Jeremiah 8:7 · Darby

Even a stork in the heavens knoweth her appointed times, and the turtle-dove and the swallow and the crane observe the time of their coming; but my people know not the judgment of Jehovah.

Jeremiah names four birds that know when to move without ever being taught. He sets them beside a people who could not read the season they were living in. Why did creatures with instinct see what was coming, while the nation that held God's law did not?

The Birds Named

Translations differ over which Hebrew word means which bird. A Bible dictionary entry on the crane explains why.

Scripture says two things about this bird: it chatters or makes a complaining noise, Isaiah 38:14; and it knows its time of migration, Jeremiah 8:7. The common crane answers to both of these characteristics. In these passages the swallow comes after the crane. The Hebrew words are sis and agur. Many hold that the translators swapped the words, so that sis means the swallow and agur the crane.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A Comparison That Shames Man

The sting lies in who God sets beside whom.

Of all the creatures we know, man is by far the most gifted and the most privileged. What is more, God has established him as lord and head over the whole system in which he moves. So it is painful that God Himself should compare man with beasts and birds. The comparison goes completely against man.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

What They Failed to Read

Why these birds? The answer is in what they do when the weather turns. (Where the ESV reads "the rules of the LORD," older translations render it "the judgment of the LORD.")

In Isaiah 1:3 God complains that man is unmoved by His grace. In Jeremiah 8:7 He complains that man is unmoved by His judgment. The birds named in this passage are all migratory. They take notice of the seasons. They notice when the sunny season is over and the clouds and storms of winter are coming. Their instinct tells them when to move on. But alas for man! What was the character of the times in which Jeremiah prophesied? It was the last days of the kingdom of Judah. The northern kingdom of ten tribes had already been overthrown. "The destroyer of the nations" (Nebuchadnezzar) was now on his way to overthrow Judah as well. So judgment was close at hand, but the people did not understand it. And so there was no repentance.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Self-Security Instead of Alarm

Not knowing was not neutral. It produced a settled calm that the prophet could not break.

The people did not know the time: they did not know His judgment; they were going on in self-security. They thought that perhaps things were not quite as right as they appeared to be, but were not so bad as this troublesome man, Jeremiah, said. And so they were crying "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They were not even ashamed when they had committed abominations.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Noah and Nineveh

Scripture also gives us the opposite. Two examples acted on a warning about the future.

The men of Jeremiah's time and our Lord's day find their contrast in Noah. "By faith Noah, being warned by God concerning events as yet unseen, in reverent fear constructed an ark for the saving of his household" (Hebrews 11:7). Like the crane and the swallow, he saw the dark clouds approaching, and judged it wisdom to seek a place of safety. The men of Nineveh teach us an even more striking lesson. Jonah's preaching shook the whole city. The king came down from his throne and humbled himself before God, along with all his people. They recognised a warning from heaven in the words of the strange man who walked through their streets.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Appointed Time Still Holds

If God keeps time with the birds, what does that say about His timing with His own people?

God never fails to take the stork, the crane and the swallow by instinct at the appointed time. Can He then fail at the appointed time to take the saints to meet their Lord? It is sad and humbling that the Lord has to complain. The swallows know their appointed time, yet He says, "My people know not the judgment of the Lord." Is this not as true of the Christian world now as it was of Israel then? Men go on dreaming of continual summer — yes, of increasing sunshine, peace, temperance, prosperity — just at the very time when the saints are about to be gone like the swallows of autumn, and the storms of this world's wintry blasts are about to take them all by surprise.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- Instinct. The stork, turtledove, crane and swallow all migrate. They read the change of season and move before winter.

- Indictment. Man is the most gifted and privileged creature God made. Yet in this comparison with beasts and birds, he comes off worse.

- Ignorance. Isaiah 1:3 shows man unmoved by grace. This verse shows him unmoved by judgment. Nebuchadnezzar was already on his way, and still no one repented.

- Illusion. Not knowing the time made them feel safe. They cried "Peace, peace" where there was no peace, and felt no shame for the evil they had done.

- Appointment. God never misses the birds' appointed time, and He will not miss His own. The warning calls for readiness.

Jeremiah 8:8 · Darby

How do ye say, We are wise, and the law of Jehovah is with us? Behold, certainly the lying pen of the scribes hath made it falsehood.

Judah's leaders had a reply ready for every warning from Jeremiah. They held the law of the LORD, so they must be the wise ones. God turns that claim into a question. Then He points at the pen that copied the law, and asks whether owning His word is the same as being taught by it.

The Boast Answered by Their Own Conduct

Their words about the law sound like faith. Their lives told a different story. Writers trace the same charge from Jeremiah into the New Testament.

"Those who handle the law did not know Me," says the Lord (Jer. 2:8); and though He had entrusted "the oracles of God" to them (Rom. 3:2), and they said, "We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us" (Jer. 8:8), yet again we hear an answering echo in Romans, "You who boast in the law dishonour God by breaking the law" (Rom. 2:23). Indeed the whole context breathes the one Spirit.

Modernised from H. J. VineOriginal wording

One Boast Among Several

This was not their only slogan. They leaned on a whole list of holy things, and their daily conduct contradicted every one.

Remember too, that they had their religion. How like the Christian world today. They boasted of the ark of the covenant. They had done so in Samuel's day and lost it to the Philistines, Jeremiah reminds them of that in Jer. 7. Now they were to lose it forever (see Jer. 3:16). The temple too was their lying boast but they had made it a den of thieves. Despite their wicked and immoral ways they boasted in the law, saying: "We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us" (Jer. 8:8).

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

Written, but Not Believed

The verse says the scribes' pen has turned the law into a lie. One writer applies this to a Bible that men own, read, and still refuse to believe.

There was never a day of more boasting: "we are wise." It is quite true the Word of God is in men's hands; but who believes it? … Has He made it clear? Yes, but, "Look, He has certainly made it in vain; the pen of the scribes is in vain." Yes, God has spoken in His Word in vain; men will not believe Him. "Making void the word of God by your tradition." Mark 7:13.

Modernised from C. StanleyOriginal wording

(Where this older wording says "in vain," the ESV reads "the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie.")

The Pen That Lies

Commentators differ on the second half of the verse. Some read it as God's word made useless. Others follow the alternative reading printed in the margin of some Bibles: the scribes' pen turns the word into a falsehood. Writers see the same thing wherever unbelieving men handle Scripture.

Do we not see defiance in the godless cults of our day, in their blasphemous opposition to God? Do we not see the lying pen of the scribe (Jer. 8:8, margin) in the modernist, and the terrible slide into preachers who say one thing in the pulpit while privately meaning another? The people trample on holy things without fear, and the very name of Jeremiah has become a byword for gloom.

Modernised from James McBroomOriginal wording

Wisdom Put to the Test

The people claimed wisdom while refusing what God said. One writer sets that claim beside the birds and then puts it to a single test.

The prophet was also to reason with the people of Jerusalem about their constant backsliding, which they never repented of (vv. 4-6). They were more careless than the birds they knew well, large or small, which keep to their proper seasons — and all the while they claimed to be wise (vv. 7, 8). But what wisdom is there in those who reject the word of the Lord? Their greed, and their treacherous neglect of what was truly good for Israel, must meet the punishment they deserve from His hand.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Possession. God entrusted His own words to them. The law really was theirs to hold.

- Boast. Holding it became a slogan, like the ark and the temple, while their lives stayed corrupt.

- Falsification. The pen that should have guarded the word worked falsehood instead. Writers see the same hand wherever unbelief handles Scripture.

- Disbelief. God has spoken and the book is in men's hands, yet tradition still empties it of force.

- Exposure. One test measures wisdom: what is left in those who reject the word of the LORD?

Jeremiah 8:9 · Darby

The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken behold, they have rejected Jehovah's word; and what wisdom is in them?

The wise men of Judah still held the law in their hands. They still called themselves wise. God's answer takes the title away from them. If a man sets aside what God has said, what wisdom is left in him?

The Boast That Collapses

Judah had God's words and still dishonoured them. One writer links their boast in verse 8 to the charge Paul later brings against a people proud of the law:

"Those who handle the law did not know Me," says the Lord (Jer. 2:8). God had entrusted His own words to them — "the oracles of God" (Rom. 3:2) — and they said, "We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us" (Jer. 8:8). Yet Romans gives the answering echo: "You who boast in the law dishonor God by breaking the law" (Rom. 2:23).

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

A Word Given In Vain

In an older translation, verse 8 says the pen of the scribes wrote in vain. The writer below follows that older wording. His point is that the failure lies with the readers, not with the writing:

There was never a day with more boasting, "we are wise." It is quite true that the Word of God is in men's hands. But who believes it? ... God has said it. He has made it clear... Has He made it clear? Yes, but, "Look, He made it in vain; the pen of the scribes is in vain." Yes, God has spoken in His Word in vain; men will not believe Him. "Making the word of God of no effect by your tradition." Mark 7:13.

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Nothing Left Outside The Word

Take away what God has said, and the mind has only its own guesses left:

Imagination cannot grasp or describe the things of God. When it tries to see into what they really are, it only shows how bare and poor it is. No, we know nothing outside of the word of God.

Modernised from Edward DennettOriginal wording

Guesswork In Place Of Certainty

Writers also apply the verse to scholars who rewrite the Bible and call it an improvement. One points out how their own words give them away:

In the extracts we have given, who can miss how often the words "probably," "seem," and "conjecturally" come back? ... this scholar would have us take his guesses in place of the sure Word of God. Jeremiah has described this whole class of thinkers in words that should never be forgotten: "they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?"

Modernised from The Christian's FriendOriginal wording

Unbelief In Religious Dress

Rejecting God's word does not always look like open unbelief. Often it wears religious dress, and that is the form people choose most readily:

A Christianity built on tradition is real unbelief, because it denies the Scriptures. The Scriptures claim to be enough on their own, and they set themselves up as the standard... One is open unbelief, the other is religious unbelief, and man far prefers the second. It lets him keep God at a distance, which is what man, or the flesh, wants, and at the same time keep a conscience at peace with religion.

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

Ashamed, Dismayed, And Taken

Ashamed, dismayed, taken — God Himself brings this collapse. One writer follows the chapter from the question about wisdom into the judgment that answers it:

But what wisdom is in those who reject the word of the Lord? Their greed, and their treacherous neglect of what was truly good for Israel, must meet the punishment they deserve from His hand. He will certainly consume them. He will overturn their careful plans, disappoint their hopes, and make the whole land tremble before its enemies.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The Opposite Of Rejecting

If rejecting God's word empties a man of wisdom, then keeping it marks out the person God owns:

Every teaching of human improvement denies that sin has utterly ruined man... It is a solemn truth about the great men and the wise of this world: "They have rejected the word of the LORD." The mark of a Christian is, "You have kept My word and have not denied My name." Rev. 3:8. Which is true of you, dear reader?

Modernised from C StanleyOriginal wording

Summary

- The boast — Judah called itself wise because it had the law. Holding God's words while dishonouring them is what this verse exposes.

- The word in vain — God spoke clearly and the scribes wrote it down. Men still would not believe, so the writing did nothing in them.

- The emptiness — outside the word of God we know nothing. Imagination cannot describe the things of God; it only shows its own poverty.

- The disguise — unbelief often wears religion instead of open denial. That form lets a man keep God at a distance and his conscience comfortable.

- The end — those who set aside His word end up ashamed and taken, their plans overturned. Those who keep it carry the mark Christ commends.

Jeremiah 8:10 · Darby

Therefore will I give their wives unto others, their fields to those that shall possess [them]; for every one, from the least even unto the greatest, is given to covetousness; from the prophet even unto the priest, every one dealeth falsely.

Judah stood under sentence, and God names the cause: money. Greed reached from the poorest to the most powerful, even to prophet and priest, so the wives and fields they schemed to secure would pass to other men.

Greed from the bottom of society to the top

The same charge appears earlier in the book. One writer sets Israel's greed beside the greed of Christians, and finds Israel's the smaller sin:

Covetousness was one of the sins Israel kept falling into. We can see this from Jeremiah 6:13: "For from the least to the greatest of them, everyone is greedy for unjust gain." But let us remember that this covetousness in Israel was not nearly as bad in character as it is among us. After all, what they coveted was only an undue share of what God had given to them all. Their blessings were earthly, and no one could blame them for setting a high value on money and property. The Christian's possessions are spiritual... Christians too often covet the world and the things in it — things on which they should not set their heart or affections at all. What a tale it tells of spiritual deadness, when a child of God, an heir of glory, is seen coveting the poor riches of earth!

Modernised from A. T. SchofieldOriginal wording

Older translations call this greed "covetousness."

When the pulpit itself is for sale

The verse does not stop at the crowd. It climbs to prophet and priest and finds the same falseness there. One commentator names the passion behind it, and hears the same message from pulpits today:

Covetousness, the love of money, as it is in our day, was the controlling passion. Prophet and priest dealt falsely. Their one message was "Peace, peace," when there was no peace — and it is the one message of the prophet and priest today.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

The people were not innocent bystanders. The rot ran through every layer of national life:

God claimed recognition and honour in every circle. But their politics were corrupt, their society was degraded, and their religion had given itself over to idolatry. Prophets, priests and people were all joined together in falsehood.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The sentence: losing what they grasped

Just before this verse the nation claimed to be wise, while rejecting what the Lord had said. The "therefore" of verse 10 answers that claim and takes away the security their scheming was meant to build:

But what wisdom is there in those who reject the word of the Lord? Their greed, and their treacherous neglect of what was truly good for Israel, must meet the right punishment from His hand. He will consume them without fail. He will overturn their careful plans, disappoint their hopes, and make the whole land tremble before its enemies, who will bite like snakes that no charmer can tame.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Their greed was not only a sin against God. It was a betrayal of their own people. The men who should have guarded Israel's welfare were busy enriching themselves, and the invaders would take everything they had gathered.

Why the warning is not only ancient history

Commentators read this passage as a mirror, not a museum piece. Teachers who profit by telling people what they want to hear are not confined to Judah:

Jeremiah's writings show us most fully the prophets prophesying falsely, and the priests going along with the evil so that they could rule. "And my people love to have it so, but what will you do when the end comes?" says the true prophet in his anguish... How little they believe that God's eye is on their selfish trade. How little they believe that their destruction is not asleep.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Two things stand out. First, the people wanted the comfortable message, so the false teachers were meeting a demand. Second, God already sees the trade, and the destruction waiting for it is not asleep.

Summary

- Greed — The charge starts with money. Nobody was left out, from the poorest to the most powerful. The sin is not poverty or wealth but wanting an undue share.

- Falsehood — Greed does not stay in the wallet. It buys the message. Prophet and priest dealt falsely, and their one word was "peace, peace" when there was no peace.

- Reach — No class escaped. Politics, society and religion were all corrupt, and prophets, priests and people joined in the same lie.

- Sentence — So God takes back the security they were grasping for. Wives and fields pass to others. God overturns their careful plans and disappoints their hopes.

- Warning — The same trade runs on today, and God's eye is on the selfish merchandise. Israel's blessings were earthly. A Christian's possessions are spiritual, so coveting the world is a worse thing now than it was then.

Jeremiah 8:11 · Darby

And they have healed the breach of the daughter of my people lightly, saying, Peace, peace! when there is no peace.

Judah is in real danger, and her own religious leaders keep telling her that all is well. The verse asks two hard questions: how can healers treat a deep wound as a scratch, and how can the word "peace" become a lie?

A deep wound treated as a scratch

The complaint is not that no one treated the people. It is that the healers worked on the surface. One writer hears in the verse the prophet's grief over a remedy that did not fit the injury.

It is the lament of the prophet over the condition God's people were in during his ministry. The prophet brings this great fact home to them. There is a wound there. And there were religious quacks with their remedies in that day who tried to heal that wound lightly. And how? By giving a message that did not match the state they were in. If God comes and deals with us, He must have reality. He could not add to a festering sore or wound if it is there in our moral being. "Peace, peace" was propping up a rotten order of things. God is too faithful, too holy and too gracious not to meet the condition of things exactly as it really is before Him.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

Why the lie was welcome

A false message needs willing hearers. The comfortable verdict fitted what the people already thought about themselves. The prophet who said otherwise was the nuisance.

The people did not know the time; they did not know His judgment; they were going on in self-security. They thought that perhaps things were not quite as right as they appeared to be, but were not as bad as this troublesome man, Jeremiah, said. And so they were crying "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They were not even ashamed when they had committed abominations. The prophet could only give himself up to sorrow over them. "Is there no balm in Gilead? Is there no physician there? Why then has the health of the daughter of my people not been restored?"

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The target: the conscience

Smooth preaching is not just inaccurate. It has a target, it blocks what God is doing, and it costs the hearers dear.

When the people of God go wrong, there is always the spirit of false prophecy which would make them believe that all goes well. Men in authority do not want to be discouraged: see the opposition to Jeremiah in Jerusalem. The false prophet helps in this, to stop the conscience from turning back to God. God would use chastening to bring the conscience into direct contact with Him. The spirit of falsehood would persuade them that they are very happy. Those who call them blessed are the misleaders. Those who are so called, and believe them, are swallowed up.

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

A calm that comes from not knowing the danger

The same calm settles on anyone who has never faced God. One writer names its source, and the order in which real peace comes.

This is the devil's peace; he rocks men in the cradle of security; he cries "Peace, peace," when men are on the edge of hell. The seeming peace a sinner has does not come from knowing he is happy, but from being ignorant of his danger. … True peace comes after trouble. God convinces and humbles the soul; then He speaks peace. Many say they have peace, but is this peace before a storm, or after it? True peace is after trouble. … God pours the golden oil of peace into broken hearts.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Why God will not say it

God's refusal to say the word is not harshness. It comes from what He is.

Purity comes first, before peace even. If we think about it, we will see at once that this must be so, since all is of God. He never compromises with evil, and so there can be no peace except in purity. Again and again this was the burden of the prophets. See for instance, Isaiah 48:22; Isaiah 57:21; Jeremiah 6:14; Jeremiah 8:11; Ezekiel 13:10, 16.

Modernised from F. B. HoleOriginal wording

The peace Christ proclaims

In Jeremiah the word "peace" had nothing behind it. Christ proclaims a peace that has everything behind it.

The peace He proclaims is not a mere sedative for the conscience. It is the blessed knowledge that His atoning blood has settled every question fairly. As a result, every storm cloud has been cleared away for ever. "He is our peace," says the apostle. He is now accepted in heaven. That very fact is the public proof that the horizon toward God has been cleared once and for all for those who believe in His name.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

Summary

- The wound — The injury in the people is real. God deals with things exactly as they are before Him.

- The patch — Healers treated the wound lightly. Their message did not fit the state of the people, and it propped up a rotten order of things.

- The appeal — Such preaching stops the conscience from turning back to God. Men in authority welcome it, because they do not want to be discouraged.

- The test — Peace before the storm is only ignorance of danger. Peace after God has humbled the soul is the real thing.

- The cure — There is no peace except in purity. The peace Christ proclaims rests on His atoning blood, which has settled every question.

Jeremiah 8:12 · Darby

Are they ashamed that they have committed abomination? Nay, they are not at all ashamed, and they know not how to blush. Therefore shall they fall among them that fall in the time of their visitation they shall stumble, saith Jehovah.

God asks His people in Judah a plain question: did they blush at all over what they had done? The answer is no. The verse turns the loss of shame into the reason for the fall.

Shame Is Sin's Firstborn

Where does a blush come from? One writer traces it back to the first moment of sin.

Shame is sin's firstborn. It is often pushed aside by sin's later offspring (Jer. 6:15), while nature runs on in its dark course; but it returns to its first place whenever light breaks in on the soul.

Modernised from A. PridhamOriginal wording

So a lost blush does not prove the conscience was never there. It proves that later sins have buried it.

A Forehead That Cannot Redden

Scripture reads a person's face as a sign of the heart. Two faces stand opposite each other here: Israel's, and the bride's.

The forehead is used in Scripture to express either modesty or boldness. The prophet had to say of Israel, "You are obstinate … your forehead brass" (Isa. 48:4). The Lord asks, "Were they ashamed when they committed abomination?" The answer comes back: "No, they were not at all ashamed; they did not know how to blush" (Jer. 6:15; Jer. 8:12). In contrast, the bride is marked by modesty. She can blush… Under the outward symbol of subjection there was genuine modesty. Not outward subjection, and inward rebellion.

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Judah kept the outward forms while rebellion ran on inside. A face that can still redden shows something real underneath.

How The Blush Was Lost

How does a whole nation reach that state? It starts with a comfortable lie.

The people did not know the time; they did not know His judgment; they were going on in self-security. They thought that things were perhaps not quite as right as they seemed, but not as bad as this troublesome man, Jeremiah, said. And so they were crying "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They were not even ashamed when they had committed abominations.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Comfort given where there is no ground for it does not calm a conscience. It kills it.

Hardened Hearts, Then Retribution

The verse hinges on one word: therefore. The judgment at the end grows out of what came before it.

They did not repent of their wickedness. Theirs was a perpetual backsliding. The stork knows his appointed time. The turtle dove, the crane and the swallow keep the time of their coming. But they had hardened their hearts so far that they did not know the judgment of the Lord. So the retribution follows.

Modernised from Arno C. GaebeleinOriginal wording

They fall among the fallen — swept off with the crowd. Older translations call that moment the time of their visitation: a visit from God.

Scripture contemplates a day or time of visitation. (Jer. 8:12; Luke 19:44; 1 Peter 2:12)

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

This visit is either in mercy (Luke 19; 1 Peter 2), or in judgment (Jer. 8).

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

God draws near either way. The first half of the verse decides which kind Judah receives.

The Same Shamelessness, Later

Judah is not the last case. Commentators find the same lost shame in what Scripture says about the last days.

The unbridled lust, lawlessness, boldness, self-will and corruption of the last days will be more terrible than any outbreak of evil in the past. This is because it is found among people who claim the Christian name, and it exists in the full light of the truth. Men usually, out of sheer shame, wait for the darkness of night for their evil deeds. These men, without shame, "riot in the daytime". As one has said, "They have learnt to face the light and defy it."

Modernised from Hamilton SmithOriginal wording

Summary

- Blush lost. Shame is the first thing sin produces. When later sins crowd it out, a person can commit an abomination and feel nothing.

- Blush faked. The face shows either modesty or boldness. Outward religion with inward rebellion hardens the forehead like brass.

- Blush killed. The numbness came from "Peace, peace" where there was no peace. False comfort leaves people sure of a safety they do not have.

- Blush judged. Birds keep their seasons. Judah could not read hers. Hearts hardened against the Lord's judgment bring retribution on themselves.

- Blush recovered. God's visit comes in mercy or in judgment. Shame returns the moment light breaks in on the soul. Feeling it again is a mercy, not a burden.

Jeremiah 8:13 · Darby

I will utterly take them away, saith Jehovah there are no grapes on the vine, nor figs on the fig-tree; and the leaf is faded and I will give them up to those that shall pass over them.

God walks through His own vineyard in Jeremiah's day like an owner at harvest time. He finds the branches empty. Two questions follow. What can God expect from a people He planted? And what happens to His gifts when nothing comes back to Him?

The owner's claim

The vine and the fig tree were not wild growth. They stand for a nation God Himself planted, tended, and fenced. So the empty branch is guilt, not misfortune. One commentator sets the two sides side by side:

There was no more doubt of the goodness shown to Israel than of their obligation to bear fruit for God. But obligation produces no fruit fit for Him. What was the consequence on such ground as this? Nothing but woe after woe. Their doom would match their guilt.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Why the branches were bare

The barrenness had a history. Jeremiah preached during a national reform under King Josiah. Idols came down and the outward scene improved. One writer sets that reform beside the revivals of the last days:

These end-time revivals have a powerful effect on everyone, but only the remnant is real at heart. The book of Jeremiah, who prophesied under Josiah, shows that the moral state of the people did not change at all. They agreed easily to the removal of idols under the faithful king, but their hearts stayed as far from God as ever.

Modernised from H. L. RossierOriginal wording

The leaf that fades

Note the order in the verse: no grapes, no figs, and only then the fading leaf. On a fig tree the fruit comes before the leaf. So a leafy tree promises a harvest it does not have. When the promise proves empty, the display dies with it:

It is impossible to forget, as we think of this, that tree on which the Lord once sought fruit. He found none. He said, "May no fruit ever come from you again," and at once the fig tree withered away. The leaf withered because the fruit was not to be found, for in the case of the fig tree the leaves come out after the fruit... on this tree there was already the leaf of profession, and so the meaning of the judgment is plain.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

What He gave, He takes back

The last line is the heaviest: what God gave them passes away from them. One writer ties that loss to their treatment of God's word:

But what wisdom is there in those who reject the word of the Lord? Their greed and treacherous neglect of Israel's true interests must meet their due repayment at His hands. He will surely consume them. He will overturn their careful plans, disappoint their hopes, and make the whole land tremble before their enemies.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The same test turned on us

The principle is not locked in the past. One writer applies the same test to the church:

God has a right to look for fruit in proportion to the pains He took, and if there were none, judgment must follow. God never stops at what is spoiled to patch up the gaps. He looks at what He did at the beginning, and compares it with the present state. So the Lord says to the church in Ephesus, "You have abandoned the love you had at first."

Modernised from J. N. DarbyOriginal wording

Beyond the withered tree

A withered tree is not the end of the story. God's answer to a fruitless people is not repair but new birth:

How is the curse on that fruitless tree to be reconciled with Israel being to the praise of the Lord in days to come? Israel must be born again. "This generation" will never produce fruit for the Lord. It is to be destroyed under the judgment of God; and a new race will be born. The pattern of the past makes room for a striking picture of the future.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Planted — God fenced and tended this vine Himself. His claim to fruit is as sure as His goodness. The empty branch is guilt, not bad weather.

- Hollow — Reform under a good king changed the nation's public face, not its heart. Reform without heart grows leaves without figs.

- Exposed — On a fig tree the fruit comes first. The fading leaf is an outward show with nothing behind it.

- Removed — Rejecting God's word costs more than reputation. God overturns their plans, disappoints their hopes, and takes back what He gave.

- Reborn — God measures us by what He did at the beginning. His answer to a withered tree is not repair but new birth and a future harvest.

Jeremiah 8:14 · Darby

Why do we sit still? Assemble yourselves, and let us enter into the fenced cities, and let us be silent there for Jehovah our God hath put us to silence, and given us water of gall to drink, because we have sinned against Jehovah.

The verse sounds like a plan of retreat: gather, run to the walled cities, and die there. It ends with an admission of sin. So why does that admission change nothing? And what is the poisoned drink God is said to hand them?

Who Is Speaking

Commentators differ over whose voice this is. One says the words belong to the prophet, not to the people who refused to repent:

Verses 13-17. Verse 13 shows the desolation that will fall on the land when the Lord arises. The prophet spoke the words of verses 14-16 — not the unrepentant people, as some take it. The 16th verse is extremely vivid.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Water of Gall

The poisoned water takes its name from a plant. A dictionary entry traces the word to bitterness, and to idolatry:

Gall (Hebrew rosh) is some very bitter or poisonous plant, not identified for certain. The word is a symbol of "bitterness." To turn to idolatry was like "a root that bears gall and wormwood." Deut. 29:18. God gave them His judgments as water of gall to drink. Jer. 8:14; Jer. 9:15; Jer. 23:15... The Roman soldiers drank sour wine, or vinegar. Mixed with gall, they gave it to men about to be crucified — to dull the pain of the torture, as people now suppose. They offered it to the Lord, but He refused it. Ps. 69:21; Matt. 27:34.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The cup Judah had earned was later held out to Christ, and He would not take it. (Deuteronomy 29:18 reads in the ESV: "a root bearing poisonous and bitter fruit.")

The Walled Cities Will Not Hold

Running to the fortified cities looks like sensible strategy. But one commentator reads this whole section as God overturning such plans:

But what wisdom is in those who reject the word of the Lord? Their greed and treacherous neglect of Israel's true interests must meet the punishment they deserve from Him. He will indeed consume them. He will overturn their careful plans and disappoint their hopes. He will make the whole land tremble before its enemies, who will bite like snakes that no charmer can tame. (Ver. 9-17.)

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Their own words concede the outcome. They go into the cities not to survive but to die there.

Warned, and Still Not Turning

The threat was not vague. Judah's place in history made it plain:

What kind of times did Jeremiah prophesy in? They were the last days of the kingdom of Judah. The northern kingdom of ten tribes had already fallen. Now "the destroyer of the nations" — Nebuchadnezzar — was on his way to overthrow Judah too. So judgment was close, but the people did not understand it. And so there was no repentance.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

So the closing line of the verse — that they have sinned — is not the same thing as turning back. They state the cause of their ruin and walk into it.

No Remedy in the Nation Itself

The prophet's reaction follows in the same chapter, and he searches for a cure that is not there. His question about the balm of Gilead and the physician gets no answer from within Judah:

"This evil family" would spread the bones of the dead before the host of heaven, and would even want to die themselves. Yet they felt no shame; they "did not know how to blush." No one turned from his wickedness. Feeling all this, the prophet cries, "Dismay has taken hold on me! Is there no balm in Gilead? Is there no physician there?" (Jer. 8:21-22). None could be found. There was no man. The coming of Christ is the only hope.

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

Summary

- Sin. The verse names its own cause. The bitter drink comes because they sinned against the Lord. Their greed and neglect of Israel's true good had to be punished.

- Sentence. Gall means bitterness. The water of gall is God's judgment handed to them as a drink — the same drink later offered to Christ, who refused it.

- Shelter. Crowding into walled cities looks wise. But God overturns such plans and disappoints such hopes.

- Stupor. Nebuchadnezzar was already on the way. Judgment was plain, yet the people did not understand it. So there was no repentance.

- Saviour. Admitting sin without turning leaves no cure: no balm, no physician, no man. The coming of Christ is the only hope.

Jeremiah 8:15 · Darby

Peace is looked for, and there is no good; a time of healing, and behold, terror.

Judah expected relief; what came instead was dread. Why did a people so sure of peace get the opposite, and did God's word fail, or only the hopes they had built beside it?

God Reverses Their Hopes

The words fall inside a long stretch of chapter 8 where God answers a nation that will not turn back. One writer sums up this whole run of verses. He traces the disappointment straight to God's own hand.

But what wisdom is in those who reject the word of the Lord? They are greedy, and they have treacherously neglected the true interests of Israel. At His hands this must meet the punishment it deserves. He will surely consume. He will overturn their wise plans, disappoint their hopes, and make the whole land tremble before its enemies, who will bite like serpents that cannot be charmed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Whose Voice Speaks

Who speaks these words — the people, or the prophet? Commentators differ, and one gives his reading while noting the other view.

Verse 13 shows the desolation that will fall on the land when the Lord arises. The words of verses 14-16 were spoken by the prophet, and not by the unrepentant people, as some take it.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why No Healing Came

Why did no healing come? One writer points to a wound treated lightly by those who cried "Peace, peace."

The prophet brings home this great fact to them: there is a wound there. In that day there were religious remedies and quacks who tried to heal that wound lightly. And how? By offering a message that did not match the real state of things. If God comes and deals with us, dear friends, He must have reality. He could not add to a festering sore or wound, if it is there in our moral being. "Peace, peace" was propping up a rotten order of things. God is too faithful, too holy, and too gracious not to deal with things exactly as they really are before Him.

Modernised from W. T. TurpinOriginal wording

A People Who Could Not Read the Moment

What made the false hope possible? One writer describes a people who could not read their own time.

The people did not know the time; they did not know His judgment; they were going on in self-security. They thought that perhaps things were not quite as right as they appeared. But they did not think things were as bad as this troublesome man Jeremiah said. And so they were crying "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They were not even ashamed when they had committed terrible things. The prophet could only give himself up to sorrow over them.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

When a Hope for Peace Is Shattered

The terror that came instead of healing looks like pure loss. One writer sees it differently.

It is a mercy from God when a false peace is smashed up. The great bitterness that results is not pleasant, but it is still the way to God.

Modernised from W. W. FeredayOriginal wording

The Purpose Behind the Blow

One writer comments on another prophecy where a nation's confidence was struck down blow after blow. He finds God's purpose behind the repeated disappointment.

It is striking how these prophecies follow one another. That shows how urgent it was to God that His people should encourage themselves in no false hope. We can see how every blow on such hopes was meant to fasten their hope on God Himself. But how little will man listen to anything short of experience itself! And experience, as everyone admits, is a hard teacher. How we have again and again to hear the word "Cease from man" stated, and then underlined by the event itself.

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

The same source traces where those hopes came from, and names what really failed.

This is another solemn testimony against vain hopes. The people expected the message of peace the false prophets had given them. They based that hope on all the promises made to their fathers. They were already seeing their vision fail, and it was no true vision. How often people imagine that God's word has failed, when the failure is only that of hopes falsely built on His word!

Modernised from Numerical Bible NotesOriginal wording

Summary

- False cure. The wound was real. Men treated it lightly with a message that did not match the people's true state, and God will not build on a rotten order of things.

- False calm. They did not know the time or the judgment, so they lived in self-security, saying "Peace, peace," and felt no shame.

- Broken hope. God Himself reversed their plans and disappointed their hopes, so terror came where they expected healing.

- Real cause. Commentators differ on who speaks here. They agree on this: God's word did not fail. The hopes falsely built beside it did.

- Real mercy. The smashing of a false peace is a kindness, because every blow on such hopes was meant to fasten hope on God Himself.

Jeremiah 8:16 · Darby

The snorting of his horses is heard from Dan the whole land trembleth at the sound of the neighing of his steeds, and they come, and devour the land, and all it contains, the city and those that dwell therein.

Judah expected peace, but instead a sound reaches Jerusalem from the far north: warhorses on the move, and a land shaking at the noise. Who is coming, why does the sound start at Dan, and why does it fall on people who thought they were safe?

The invader behind the noise

One writer names the invader and the anger behind him:

There was no man to save the sorrowful situation. So the instrument of God's anger is raised up! The event the book points to is about to happen! Nebuchadnezzar — the lion of Babylon — the destroyer from the north is coming! The battle standard is unfurled! The trumpet sound is heard! Evil comes, and a great destruction!

Modernised from H J VineOriginal wording

The speaker of these words

Some readers take verses 14 to 16 as the cry of the people. One writer gives them to Jeremiah instead:

Verse 13 shows the desolation that will fall on the land when the Lord arises. The words of verses 14-16 were spoken by the prophet, and not by the unrepentant people, as some take them. Verse 16 is extremely vivid.

Modernised from Arno Clemens GaebeleinOriginal wording

Why the sound comes from Dan

Dan stood in the far north, and it was known for two things:

This is often named as the northern border of Palestine; "from Dan to Beersheba" means the whole land. It was here that open idolatry was set up early on.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So the noise starts where the nation first turned from God. It is also the first place an invader from the north would cross the border.

The horses themselves

Horses are not a neutral detail in Scripture. One survey traces where Israel's horses came from and what they stand for:

Horses were forbidden to Israel (Deuteronomy 17:16), and they were brought from Egypt (1 Kings 10:28)... The Assyrian armies were famous for horses. So they represent strength, swiftness, fearlessness, majesty, and strength in battle (Proverbs 21:31; Jeremiah 6:23; Jeremiah 8:16).

Modernised from The Bible TreasuryOriginal wording

The animal Israel was forbidden to keep is now thundering toward her.

Nothing left uneaten

The threat covers land, city and people together. One writer traces the trembling back to its cause — a people who rejected the Lord's word:

But what wisdom is there in those who reject the word of the Lord? Their greed and treacherous neglect of Israel's true interests must meet with the punishment they deserve at His hands. He will surely consume them. He will overturn their careful plans, disappoint their hopes, and make the whole land tremble before their enemies, who will bite like snakes that cannot be charmed.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The peace that was never there

Why was the shock so complete? One writer points to what the people believed about themselves:

The people did not know the time; they did not know His judgment; they were carrying on in false security. They thought perhaps things were not quite as right as they appeared, but not as bad as this troublesome man Jeremiah said. And so they were crying "Peace, peace," where there was no peace. They were not even ashamed when they had committed abominations.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

Summary

- Sound. Jerusalem hears the army before it sees it — horses snorting and neighing at the border. The words are Jeremiah's, not the frightened crowd's.

- Source. The horses belong to Nebuchadnezzar, "the destroyer from the north." God raised him up as the instrument of His anger against a nation that had no one left to save it.

- Start. Dan marks the northern edge of the land. It is also where open idolatry first took hold. Judgment enters where the drift away from God began.

- Sweep. Horses in Scripture stand for strength, swiftness, fearlessness and power in battle. This army devours land, city and people alike. The whole land trembles before enemies who bite like snakes that cannot be charmed.

- Security. The shock lands on people crying "Peace, peace" where there was no peace. They were not ashamed of their sin, and they felt safe. The sound from Dan answers that.

Jeremiah 8:17 · Darby

For behold, I send among you serpents, vipers against which there is no charm, and they shall bite you, saith Jehovah.

In Jeremiah 8 the Lord answers people who had rejected His word. His answer is something He sends: snakes that no charmer can quiet. Two questions follow. Who are these serpents, and why does the usual remedy fail?

The enemy God sends

Commentators read the serpents as the enemy God brings against people who rejected His word — the repayment their greed had earned.

But what wisdom is there in those who reject the word of the Lord? They are greedy, and they betray Israel's true interests by neglecting them. His hand must repay them as they deserve. He will surely consume. He will overturn their careful plans and disappoint their hopes. He will make the whole land tremble before their enemies, who will bite like serpents that no one can charm.

Modernised from William KellyOriginal wording

The creature named

Older translations turned the Hebrew word behind the ESV's "adders" into "cockatrices." The exact reptile is uncertain. The trait Jeremiah names is not.

tsiphoni. Older translators rendered this word 'adder' in the text only once, in Proverbs 23:32. They rendered it 'cockatrice' four times: in Isaiah 11:8; Isaiah 14:29; Isaiah 59:5, which refer to its poison, and in Jeremiah 8:17, which says it will not be charmed, but will bite. People take it to be the 'yellow viper' of Palestine, which hides in dens and has deadly poison. Reports say it resists the skill of the snake charmers. The cockatrice was an imaginary creature, and the translators may have picked its name for some unknown deadly snake.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

The charmer's art

Charming was a real trade, and Scripture uses the word in more than one setting.

In Psalm 58:5 and Jeremiah 8:17 the reference is to those who can charm serpents, probably by soft and gentle sounds. In Deuteronomy 18:11 and Isaiah 19:3 it is linked with idolatry and sorcerers: these also carry on their incantations with low mutterings.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

So Jeremiah names a skill that works on other snakes. On these it fails.

Poison as a picture

In Scripture snake venom points two ways at once.

Scripture uses the poison of serpents and of asps as a symbol of God's judgement and of the malice that belongs to the wicked. Deuteronomy 32:24, 33; Psalm 58:4; Psalm 140:3; Romans 3:13. The tongue is "a restless evil, full of deadly poison." James 3:8.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

A sentence that no plea could lift

Jeremiah's commission explains why no remedy was left. The time for reversal had run out.

Jeremiah prophesied just before the Babylonian captivity. He lived to see it and to record it. Manasseh had filled Jerusalem with innocent blood. His sins made it impossible to cancel the sentence long before passed on the guilty nation, or even to put it off much longer. So Jeremiah is commissioned to declare that their doom cannot be reversed. God had given them space to repent. Again and again, when the people showed some signs of sorrow, the Lord had delayed carrying the sentence out. But now He declares Himself "weary of relenting" (older versions: "weary with repenting")… The judgment was unavoidable. No pleading, not even Moses' or Samuel's, could turn it aside.

Modernised from W. TrotterOriginal wording

Serpents sent once before

This was not the first time God sent snakes among His own people. What happened then shows how He deals with a judgment already spoken.

Israel had sinned, as we have seen, and God sent fiery serpents among them. They prayed that the serpents might be taken away, but no such prayer could succeed. The snakes that carried out God's righteous sentence had to stay in the camp. Death must follow sin, for God had said at the beginning, "In the day that you eat of it you shall surely die." But the Lord commands Moses to make a serpent of bronze and set it on a pole. Then Moses is to announce, so the whole camp can hear, that every bitten Israelite who looked to that lifted-up serpent would be healed and live.

Modernised from J. G. BellettOriginal wording

When the sting is gone

The same creature has a future in which it can no longer harm.

Its deadly sting will be changed in the millennium, when a little child shall put its hand on its den.

Modernised from Morrish Bible DictionaryOriginal wording

Summary

- Sent. The serpents are not an accident of nature. They come from God's own hand. They repay people who rejected His word, and they stand for the enemies who make the whole land tremble.

- Unstoppable. The word behind "adders" (older versions: "cockatrices") names a snake that resists the charmer's skill. It will not be charmed, but it will bite.

- Useless. Charmers worked by soft, gentle sounds, and the same word group is tied to sorcery. Against these snakes that skill fails.

- Irreversible. The Lord had delayed the sentence again and again while there was space to repent. By Jeremiah's day not even Moses' or Samuel's pleading could turn it aside.

- Remedy. When God sent serpents before, He did not take them away. He gave a bronze serpent lifted up on a pole, and whoever looked at it lived. One day the deadly sting itself will be changed.